Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Mette Andersson, Sveinung Arnesen, Gisela Böhm, Dag Elgesem, Odd Gåsdal,
Kristin Strømsnes, Endre Tvinnereim, and Jacob Aars
|
Scientific Team, University of Bergen and Rokkansenteret
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Researcher
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Based on international literature the panel recruitment process was
expected to have a success rate of approximately 14 percent. In order to
reach our minimum target of 3 500 respondents we therefore had to draw a
gross sample of 25 000 individuals.
The sample was drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry.
This register includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and
current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for
the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private
IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel
after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax
Administration.
25 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the
register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c)
address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Furthermore, all individuals over the age of 95 were excluded from the
sample. This amounted to 58 persons, thus leaving a net sample of 24 942
individuals before the recruitment process started.
In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from
wave 1).
Mode of Data Collection
Panel members were recruited per post in two steps.
First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters
contained the following information; a) a description of the project, b)
the Citizen Panel’s policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the
anonymity of the participators, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the
participants’ rights to opt out of the panel at any time in the future,
e) contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a
unique log-in id and the web address to the panel’s web site and g) the
estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).
In order to maximize the response rate, an incentive in the form of a
travel gift card was included in the project. The value of the gift card
was 25 000 NOK. To enter the lottery respondents were required to join
the panel and provide their e-mail addresses. Respondents were asked to
register on the panel’s web site and log into the survey using the
unique id-code provided in their personal letter. Information on the
lottery was included in all correspondence with respondents.
The letter was posted on the 6th of November 2013.
A reminder post card was sent on the 22nd of November 2013 to those
respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b) had neither
completed the survey nor provided their e-mail address. Respondents were
encouraged to join the panel, with reference to the letter sent two
weeks prior. The unique log-in id provided in the original letter was
also included in the post card.
A reminder e-mail was sent on the 25th of November to those respondents
who had provided their e-mail addresses, but had not yet completed the
survey.
Wave1 was closed on the 05th of January 2014.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix).
When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s
geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These
attributes were included in the sample file we received from the
Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of
education is provided by the respondents when answering the
questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer
this question. Because of this, two different weights have been
calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset. We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in
any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate
compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample. An
illustration of this is provided in table 5 which shows the effect of
weight 2 on the distribution of self-reported level of education in the
net sample:
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 1
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
w01_Weight4
|
New
variable: Added w01_Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
w01_Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 1
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
w01_k23a
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-11
|
w01_comment
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-09
|
w01_k26
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-09
|
w01_dt14
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-09
|
w01_dt15
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
w01_k7
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
w01_k11
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2018-11-07
|
w01_k9_1_sak1_kod
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
|
NA
|
2018-11-07
|
w01_k9_2_sak2_kod
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
|
NA
|
2018-11-07
|
w01_k9_3_sak3_kod
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w01_p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w01_p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
w01p4_1
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
w01p4_2
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
w01_k23
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2014-05-12
|
w01_dv36_recode
|
New
variable w01_dv36 based on w01_dv36_recode
|
|
v-100
|
2014-01-17
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 1
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 1 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
4905
|
|
# Variables
|
332
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w01_u
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes the respondents into two groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes the respondents into two groups. The two groups are asked
questions common to them both, and questions unique to the group.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
u1 |
2471 |
50.4% |
0.5037717 |
| 2 |
u2 |
2434 |
49.6% |
0.4962283 |
w01_k1
|
Variable label:
|
Interest in politics
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
505 |
10.3% |
0.102956167 |
| 2 |
Interested |
2158 |
44.0% |
0.439959225 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
1671 |
34.1% |
0.340672783 |
| 4 |
Not interested |
490 |
10.0% |
0.099898063 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
73 |
1.5% |
0.014882773 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001630989 |
w01_k2
|
Variable label:
|
Voted in the elections
|
|
Literal question:
|
Did you vote at the parliamentary elections this autumn?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
4199 |
85.6% |
0.856065240 |
| 2 |
No |
682 |
13.9% |
0.139041794 |
| 3 |
Don't remember |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001427115 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
0.3% |
0.003465851 |
w01_k3
|
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
213 |
5.1% |
0.05072636 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1158 |
27.6% |
0.27577995 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
534 |
12.7% |
0.12717314 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
291 |
6.9% |
0.06930221 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
263 |
6.3% |
0.06263396 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
175 |
4.2% |
0.04167659 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
171 |
4.1% |
0.04072398 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1188 |
28.3% |
0.28292451 |
| 9 |
Red |
80 |
1.9% |
0.01905216 |
| 10 |
Other: |
67 |
1.6% |
0.01595618 |
| 97 |
No answer |
59 |
1.4% |
0.01405096 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
706 |
|
NA |
w01_k3_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Text: Voted for following party [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w01_k4
|
Variable label:
|
Time of choosing party
|
|
Literal question:
|
When did you decide to vote for the party or list you chose?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Before the election campaign |
2749 |
65.5% |
0.65467969 |
| 2 |
During the election campaign |
1041 |
24.8% |
0.24791617 |
| 3 |
On the day of the election |
335 |
8.0% |
0.07978090 |
| 97 |
No answer |
74 |
1.8% |
0.01762324 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
706 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: too small differences between parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary
elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The differences between the parties are too minor
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
51 |
7.5% |
0.07478006 |
| 2 |
Important |
98 |
14.4% |
0.14369501 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
130 |
19.1% |
0.19061584 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
84 |
12.3% |
0.12316716 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
125 |
18.3% |
0.18328446 |
| 97 |
No answer |
194 |
28.4% |
0.28445748 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4223 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: not committed to important issues
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary
elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am not committed to any important issues
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
33 |
4.8% |
0.0483871 |
| 2 |
Important |
75 |
11.0% |
0.1099707 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
121 |
17.7% |
0.1774194 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
93 |
13.6% |
0.1363636 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
157 |
23.0% |
0.2302053 |
| 97 |
No answer |
203 |
29.8% |
0.2976540 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4223 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: not familiar with issues
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary
elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am not familiar enough with what the parties represent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
89 |
13.0% |
0.13049853 |
| 2 |
Important |
135 |
19.8% |
0.19794721 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
97 |
14.2% |
0.14222874 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
63 |
9.2% |
0.09237537 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
119 |
17.4% |
0.17448680 |
| 97 |
No answer |
179 |
26.2% |
0.26246334 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4223 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_4
|
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: lacking confidence in politicians
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary
elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I lack confidence in politicians
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
118 |
17.3% |
0.17302053 |
| 2 |
Important |
116 |
17.0% |
0.17008798 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
101 |
14.8% |
0.14809384 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
55 |
8.1% |
0.08064516 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
117 |
17.2% |
0.17155425 |
| 97 |
No answer |
175 |
25.7% |
0.25659824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4223 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_5
|
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: lack of time
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary
elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I didn’t have the time or opportunity
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
125 |
18.3% |
0.18328446 |
| 2 |
Important |
75 |
11.0% |
0.10997067 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
72 |
10.6% |
0.10557185 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
64 |
9.4% |
0.09384164 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
184 |
27.0% |
0.26979472 |
| 97 |
No answer |
162 |
23.8% |
0.23753666 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4223 |
|
NA |
w01_k6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
338 |
6.9% |
0.06890928 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
571 |
11.6% |
0.11641182 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dislike |
1084 |
22.1% |
0.22099898 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1197 |
24.4% |
0.24403670 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
1015 |
20.7% |
0.20693170 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
365 |
7.4% |
0.07441386 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
73 |
1.5% |
0.01488277 |
| 97 |
No answer |
262 |
5.3% |
0.05341488 |
w01_k6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
118 |
2.4% |
0.02405708 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
375 |
7.6% |
0.07645260 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dislike |
728 |
14.8% |
0.14841998 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
642 |
13.1% |
0.13088685 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
1224 |
25.0% |
0.24954128 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
1191 |
24.3% |
0.24281346 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
392 |
8.0% |
0.07991845 |
| 97 |
No answer |
235 |
4.8% |
0.04791030 |
w01_k6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
1086 |
22.1% |
0.22140673 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
827 |
16.9% |
0.16860347 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dislike |
677 |
13.8% |
0.13802243 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
484 |
9.9% |
0.09867482 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
838 |
17.1% |
0.17084608 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
515 |
10.5% |
0.10499490 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
236 |
4.8% |
0.04811417 |
| 97 |
No answer |
242 |
4.9% |
0.04933741 |
w01_k6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
135 |
2.8% |
0.02752294 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
296 |
6.0% |
0.06034659 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dislike |
792 |
16.1% |
0.16146789 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1426 |
29.1% |
0.29072375 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
1320 |
26.9% |
0.26911315 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
533 |
10.9% |
0.10866463 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
125 |
2.5% |
0.02548420 |
| 97 |
No answer |
278 |
5.7% |
0.05667686 |
w01_k6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
681 |
13.9% |
0.13883792 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
768 |
15.7% |
0.15657492 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dislike |
772 |
15.7% |
0.15739042 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
982 |
20.0% |
0.20020387 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
832 |
17.0% |
0.16962283 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
441 |
9.0% |
0.08990826 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
137 |
2.8% |
0.02793068 |
| 97 |
No answer |
292 |
6.0% |
0.05953109 |
w01_k6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
267 |
5.4% |
0.05443425 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
530 |
10.8% |
0.10805301 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dislike |
1049 |
21.4% |
0.21386340 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1559 |
31.8% |
0.31783894 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
917 |
18.7% |
0.18695209 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
235 |
4.8% |
0.04791030 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01162080 |
| 97 |
No answer |
291 |
5.9% |
0.05932722 |
w01_k6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
349 |
7.1% |
0.07115189 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
391 |
8.0% |
0.07971458 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dislike |
630 |
12.8% |
0.12844037 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1588 |
32.4% |
0.32375127 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
1041 |
21.2% |
0.21223242 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
478 |
9.7% |
0.09745158 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
136 |
2.8% |
0.02772681 |
| 97 |
No answer |
292 |
6.0% |
0.05953109 |
w01_k6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
209 |
4.3% |
0.04260958 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
360 |
7.3% |
0.07339450 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dislike |
670 |
13.7% |
0.13659531 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
631 |
12.9% |
0.12864424 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
1236 |
25.2% |
0.25198777 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
1168 |
23.8% |
0.23812436 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
401 |
8.2% |
0.08175331 |
| 97 |
No answer |
230 |
4.7% |
0.04689093 |
w01_k6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Red
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Red
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
1076 |
21.9% |
0.21936799 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
794 |
16.2% |
0.16187564 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dislike |
743 |
15.1% |
0.15147808 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1205 |
24.6% |
0.24566769 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
548 |
11.2% |
0.11172273 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
174 |
3.5% |
0.03547401 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
69 |
1.4% |
0.01406728 |
| 97 |
No answer |
296 |
6.0% |
0.06034659 |
w01_k7
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with new Government
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the new Government of Norway?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
287 |
5.9% |
0.05851172 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1564 |
31.9% |
0.31885831 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1475 |
30.1% |
0.30071356 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
1035 |
21.1% |
0.21100917 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
428 |
8.7% |
0.08725790 |
| 97 |
No answer |
116 |
2.4% |
0.02364934 |
w01_dt19
|
Variable label:
|
Anticipated red-green victory
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you consider the period prior to the parliamentary elections in
September, did you expect the red-green government to continue after the
election?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
428 |
17.6% |
0.1758422 |
| 2 |
No |
1952 |
80.2% |
0.8019721 |
| 97 |
Not asked |
54 |
2.2% |
0.0221857 |
| 98 |
No answer |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt20
|
Variable label:
|
Government coalition considered most likely
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which government did you consider to be most likely?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Conservative Party |
94 |
4.8% |
0.04815574 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party and the Progress Party |
675 |
34.6% |
0.34579918 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party, the Progress Party, the Christian Democratic Party and
the Liberal Party |
616 |
31.6% |
0.31557377 |
| 4 |
The Conservative Party, the Progress Party and the Christian Democratic Party |
148 |
7.6% |
0.07581967 |
| 5 |
The Conservative Party, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party |
171 |
8.8% |
0.08760246 |
| 6 |
The Conservative Party, the Christian Democratic Party and the Liberal Party |
138 |
7.1% |
0.07069672 |
| 7 |
The Labour Party |
51 |
2.6% |
0.02612705 |
| 8 |
Other: |
20 |
1.0% |
0.01024590 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
2.0% |
0.01997951 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2953 |
|
NA |
w01_dt20_8_other
|
Variable label:
|
Text: Government coalition considered most likely [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which government did you consider to be most likely?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w01_dt21
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote differently if premonition of outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Now that you know that a Conservative Party and Progress Party
government was the outcome of the election, would you have changed your
vote if you had known this in advance?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
196 |
8.1% |
0.08052588 |
| 2 |
No |
2142 |
88.0% |
0.88003287 |
| 97 |
No answer |
96 |
3.9% |
0.03944125 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt22
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party if knowledge of outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would have voted for if this is the case?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
10 |
5.1% |
0.05102041 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
17 |
8.7% |
0.08673469 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
5 |
2.6% |
0.02551020 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
28 |
14.3% |
0.14285714 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
9 |
4.6% |
0.04591837 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
8 |
4.1% |
0.04081633 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09183673 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
96 |
49.0% |
0.48979592 |
| 9 |
Other: |
2 |
1.0% |
0.01020408 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01530612 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4709 |
|
NA |
w01_dt22_9_other
|
Variable label:
|
Text: Would vote for following party if knowledge of outcome [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would have voted for if this is the case?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w01_k8_1
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on the political spectrum
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics one often speaks of the “left wing” and “right wing.” Below
is a scale where 0 represents those who are at the far left politically,
while 10 represents those who are at the far right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left |
88 |
1.8% |
0.01794088 |
| 1 |
1 |
127 |
2.6% |
0.02589195 |
| 2 |
2 |
351 |
7.2% |
0.07155963 |
| 3 |
3 |
629 |
12.8% |
0.12823649 |
| 4 |
4 |
503 |
10.3% |
0.10254842 |
| 5 |
5 |
683 |
13.9% |
0.13924567 |
| 6 |
6 |
649 |
13.2% |
0.13231397 |
| 7 |
7 |
716 |
14.6% |
0.14597350 |
| 8 |
8 |
485 |
9.9% |
0.09887870 |
| 9 |
9 |
183 |
3.7% |
0.03730887 |
| 10 |
10 Right |
162 |
3.3% |
0.03302752 |
| 97 |
No answer |
138 |
2.8% |
0.02813456 |
| 99 |
No response |
191 |
3.9% |
0.03893986 |
w01_k9_1
|
Variable label:
|
- Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w01_k9_1_sak1_kod
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - recoded
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
[Recode of w01_k9_1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4292] [Invalid:613]
[Range:1001-900906]
|
w01_k9_2
|
Variable label:
|
- Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w01_k9_2_sak2_kod
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - recoded
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
[Recode of w01_k9_2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4279] [Invalid:626]
[Range:1001-8008001]
|
w01_k9_3
|
Variable label:
|
- Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w01_k9_3_sak3_kod
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - recoded
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
[Recode of w01_k9_3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4290] [Invalid:615]
[Range:1001-900906]
|
w01_dt16_1
|
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Christian Democractic Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would
you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest
to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005708461 |
| 1 |
1 |
41 |
0.8% |
0.008358818 |
| 2 |
2 |
83 |
1.7% |
0.016921509 |
| 3 |
3 |
171 |
3.5% |
0.034862385 |
| 4 |
4 |
367 |
7.5% |
0.074821611 |
| 5 |
5 |
1000 |
20.4% |
0.203873598 |
| 6 |
6 |
1048 |
21.4% |
0.213659531 |
| 7 |
7 |
738 |
15.0% |
0.150458716 |
| 8 |
8 |
352 |
7.2% |
0.071763507 |
| 9 |
9 |
119 |
2.4% |
0.024260958 |
| 10 |
10 Right |
63 |
1.3% |
0.012844037 |
| 97 |
No answer |
895 |
18.2% |
0.182466871 |
w01_dt16_2
|
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would
you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest
to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001223242 |
| 1 |
1 |
10 |
0.2% |
0.002038736 |
| 2 |
2 |
14 |
0.3% |
0.002854230 |
| 3 |
3 |
15 |
0.3% |
0.003058104 |
| 4 |
4 |
31 |
0.6% |
0.006320082 |
| 5 |
5 |
81 |
1.7% |
0.016513761 |
| 6 |
6 |
167 |
3.4% |
0.034046891 |
| 7 |
7 |
630 |
12.8% |
0.128440367 |
| 8 |
8 |
1254 |
25.6% |
0.255657492 |
| 9 |
9 |
1157 |
23.6% |
0.235881753 |
| 10 |
10 Right |
730 |
14.9% |
0.148827727 |
| 97 |
No answer |
810 |
16.5% |
0.165137615 |
w01_dt16_3
|
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would
you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest
to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left |
16 |
0.3% |
0.003261978 |
| 1 |
1 |
18 |
0.4% |
0.003669725 |
| 2 |
2 |
15 |
0.3% |
0.003058104 |
| 3 |
3 |
27 |
0.6% |
0.005504587 |
| 4 |
4 |
36 |
0.7% |
0.007339450 |
| 5 |
5 |
89 |
1.8% |
0.018144750 |
| 6 |
6 |
70 |
1.4% |
0.014271152 |
| 7 |
7 |
193 |
3.9% |
0.039347604 |
| 8 |
8 |
499 |
10.2% |
0.101732926 |
| 9 |
9 |
1033 |
21.1% |
0.210601427 |
| 10 |
10 Right |
2075 |
42.3% |
0.423037717 |
| 97 |
No answer |
834 |
17.0% |
0.170030581 |
w01_dt16_4
|
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would
you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest
to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left |
327 |
6.7% |
0.066666667 |
| 1 |
1 |
217 |
4.4% |
0.044240571 |
| 2 |
2 |
247 |
5.0% |
0.050356779 |
| 3 |
3 |
307 |
6.3% |
0.062589195 |
| 4 |
4 |
466 |
9.5% |
0.095005097 |
| 5 |
5 |
839 |
17.1% |
0.171049949 |
| 6 |
6 |
891 |
18.2% |
0.181651376 |
| 7 |
7 |
502 |
10.2% |
0.102344546 |
| 8 |
8 |
178 |
3.6% |
0.036289501 |
| 9 |
9 |
40 |
0.8% |
0.008154944 |
| 10 |
10 Right |
21 |
0.4% |
0.004281346 |
| 97 |
No answer |
870 |
17.7% |
0.177370031 |
w01_dt16_5
|
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would
you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest
to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left |
716 |
14.6% |
0.145973496 |
| 1 |
1 |
1340 |
27.3% |
0.273190622 |
| 2 |
2 |
1139 |
23.2% |
0.232212029 |
| 3 |
3 |
509 |
10.4% |
0.103771662 |
| 4 |
4 |
164 |
3.3% |
0.033435270 |
| 5 |
5 |
89 |
1.8% |
0.018144750 |
| 6 |
6 |
23 |
0.5% |
0.004689093 |
| 7 |
7 |
13 |
0.3% |
0.002650357 |
| 8 |
8 |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001223242 |
| 9 |
9 |
12 |
0.2% |
0.002446483 |
| 10 |
10 Right |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001630989 |
| 97 |
No answer |
886 |
18.1% |
0.180632008 |
w01_dt16_6
|
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would
you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest
to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left |
65 |
1.3% |
0.013251784 |
| 1 |
1 |
113 |
2.3% |
0.023037717 |
| 2 |
2 |
299 |
6.1% |
0.060958206 |
| 3 |
3 |
560 |
11.4% |
0.114169215 |
| 4 |
4 |
1058 |
21.6% |
0.215698267 |
| 5 |
5 |
1176 |
24.0% |
0.239755352 |
| 6 |
6 |
442 |
9.0% |
0.090112130 |
| 7 |
7 |
159 |
3.2% |
0.032415902 |
| 8 |
8 |
60 |
1.2% |
0.012232416 |
| 9 |
9 |
20 |
0.4% |
0.004077472 |
| 10 |
10 Right |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001427115 |
| 97 |
No answer |
946 |
19.3% |
0.192864424 |
w01_dt16_7
|
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would
you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest
to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left |
306 |
6.2% |
0.062385321 |
| 1 |
1 |
427 |
8.7% |
0.087054027 |
| 2 |
2 |
662 |
13.5% |
0.134964322 |
| 3 |
3 |
675 |
13.8% |
0.137614679 |
| 4 |
4 |
677 |
13.8% |
0.138022426 |
| 5 |
5 |
694 |
14.1% |
0.141488277 |
| 6 |
6 |
169 |
3.4% |
0.034454638 |
| 7 |
7 |
62 |
1.3% |
0.012640163 |
| 8 |
8 |
20 |
0.4% |
0.004077472 |
| 9 |
9 |
10 |
0.2% |
0.002038736 |
| 10 |
10 Right |
12 |
0.2% |
0.002446483 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1191 |
24.3% |
0.242813456 |
w01_dt16_8
|
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would
you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest
to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left |
138 |
2.8% |
0.028134557 |
| 1 |
1 |
264 |
5.4% |
0.053822630 |
| 2 |
2 |
612 |
12.5% |
0.124770642 |
| 3 |
3 |
996 |
20.3% |
0.203058104 |
| 4 |
4 |
926 |
18.9% |
0.188786952 |
| 5 |
5 |
653 |
13.3% |
0.133129460 |
| 6 |
6 |
268 |
5.5% |
0.054638124 |
| 7 |
7 |
101 |
2.1% |
0.020591233 |
| 8 |
8 |
42 |
0.9% |
0.008562691 |
| 9 |
9 |
25 |
0.5% |
0.005096840 |
| 10 |
10 Right |
24 |
0.5% |
0.004892966 |
| 97 |
No answer |
856 |
17.5% |
0.174515800 |
w01_dt16_9
|
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Red
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would
you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest
to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Red
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left |
2508 |
51.1% |
0.511314985 |
| 1 |
1 |
728 |
14.8% |
0.148419980 |
| 2 |
2 |
256 |
5.2% |
0.052191641 |
| 3 |
3 |
100 |
2.0% |
0.020387360 |
| 4 |
4 |
76 |
1.5% |
0.015494393 |
| 5 |
5 |
89 |
1.8% |
0.018144750 |
| 6 |
6 |
29 |
0.6% |
0.005912334 |
| 7 |
7 |
21 |
0.4% |
0.004281346 |
| 8 |
8 |
17 |
0.3% |
0.003465851 |
| 9 |
9 |
15 |
0.3% |
0.003058104 |
| 10 |
10 Right |
19 |
0.4% |
0.003873598 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1047 |
21.3% |
0.213455657 |
w01_k10
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway? Do you
believe it is:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
1832 |
37.3% |
0.373496432 |
| 2 |
Good |
2178 |
44.4% |
0.444036697 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
453 |
9.2% |
0.092354740 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor poor |
157 |
3.2% |
0.032008155 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poor |
101 |
2.1% |
0.020591233 |
| 6 |
Poor |
34 |
0.7% |
0.006931702 |
| 7 |
Very poor |
10 |
0.2% |
0.002038736 |
| 97 |
No answer |
140 |
2.9% |
0.028542304 |
w01_k11
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with the Norwegian democracy
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy
works in Norway?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
858 |
17.5% |
0.174923547 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2757 |
56.2% |
0.562079511 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
894 |
18.2% |
0.182262997 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
188 |
3.8% |
0.038328236 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
43 |
0.9% |
0.008766565 |
| 97 |
No answer |
165 |
3.4% |
0.033639144 |
w01_k12_1
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Government
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Government
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
136 |
2.8% |
0.02772681 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
1410 |
28.7% |
0.28746177 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1493 |
30.4% |
0.30438328 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
613 |
12.5% |
0.12497452 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
545 |
11.1% |
0.11111111 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
223 |
4.5% |
0.04546381 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
90 |
1.8% |
0.01834862 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
92 |
1.9% |
0.01875637 |
| 97 |
No answer |
303 |
6.2% |
0.06177370 |
w01_k12_2
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Parliament
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Parliament
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
256 |
5.2% |
0.052191641 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
1752 |
35.7% |
0.357186544 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1446 |
29.5% |
0.294801223 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
568 |
11.6% |
0.115800204 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
340 |
6.9% |
0.069317023 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
102 |
2.1% |
0.020795107 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
42 |
0.9% |
0.008562691 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
92 |
1.9% |
0.018756371 |
| 97 |
No answer |
307 |
6.3% |
0.062589195 |
w01_k12_3
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Politicians
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
31 |
0.6% |
0.006320082 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
438 |
8.9% |
0.089296636 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1660 |
33.8% |
0.338430173 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
827 |
16.9% |
0.168603466 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
1027 |
20.9% |
0.209378186 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
353 |
7.2% |
0.071967380 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
170 |
3.5% |
0.034658512 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
85 |
1.7% |
0.017329256 |
| 97 |
No answer |
314 |
6.4% |
0.064016310 |
w01_k12_4
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Parties
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005708461 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
379 |
7.7% |
0.077268094 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1722 |
35.1% |
0.351070336 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
1079 |
22.0% |
0.219979613 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
887 |
18.1% |
0.180835882 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
208 |
4.2% |
0.042405708 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
59 |
1.2% |
0.012028542 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
190 |
3.9% |
0.038735984 |
| 97 |
No answer |
353 |
7.2% |
0.071967380 |
w01_k12_5
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The Sameting
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Sameting
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
44 |
0.9% |
0.008970438 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
228 |
4.6% |
0.046483180 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
357 |
7.3% |
0.072782875 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
1488 |
30.3% |
0.303363914 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
267 |
5.4% |
0.054434251 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
192 |
3.9% |
0.039143731 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
179 |
3.6% |
0.036493374 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
1796 |
36.6% |
0.366156983 |
| 97 |
No answer |
354 |
7.2% |
0.072171254 |
w01_k12_6
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The County Council
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The County Council
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
33 |
0.7% |
0.006727829 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
435 |
8.9% |
0.088685015 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1122 |
22.9% |
0.228746177 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
1404 |
28.6% |
0.286238532 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
589 |
12.0% |
0.120081549 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
234 |
4.8% |
0.047706422 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
153 |
3.1% |
0.031192661 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
588 |
12.0% |
0.119877676 |
| 97 |
No answer |
347 |
7.1% |
0.070744139 |
w01_k12_7
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The Municipal Council
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The municipal council
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
46 |
0.9% |
0.009378186 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
739 |
15.1% |
0.150662589 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1676 |
34.2% |
0.341692151 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
854 |
17.4% |
0.174108053 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
745 |
15.2% |
0.151885831 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
243 |
5.0% |
0.049541284 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
110 |
2.2% |
0.022426096 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
183 |
3.7% |
0.037308869 |
| 97 |
No answer |
309 |
6.3% |
0.062996942 |
w01_k12_8
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: EU
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The EU
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
62 |
1.3% |
0.01264016 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
425 |
8.7% |
0.08664628 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1112 |
22.7% |
0.22670744 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
1003 |
20.4% |
0.20448522 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
855 |
17.4% |
0.17431193 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
555 |
11.3% |
0.11314985 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
374 |
7.6% |
0.07624873 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
205 |
4.2% |
0.04179409 |
| 97 |
No answer |
314 |
6.4% |
0.06401631 |
w01_k12_9
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: UN
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The UN
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
324 |
6.6% |
0.06605505 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
1497 |
30.5% |
0.30519878 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1356 |
27.6% |
0.27645260 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
703 |
14.3% |
0.14332314 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
320 |
6.5% |
0.06523955 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
126 |
2.6% |
0.02568807 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
74 |
1.5% |
0.01508665 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
185 |
3.8% |
0.03771662 |
| 97 |
No answer |
320 |
6.5% |
0.06523955 |
w01_dt5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Courts
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Courts/Judiciary
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
644 |
13.1% |
0.13129460 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
2124 |
43.3% |
0.43302752 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
962 |
19.6% |
0.19612640 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
399 |
8.1% |
0.08134557 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
287 |
5.9% |
0.05851172 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
85 |
1.7% |
0.01732926 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
61 |
1.2% |
0.01243629 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
101 |
2.1% |
0.02059123 |
| 97 |
No answer |
242 |
4.9% |
0.04933741 |
w01_dt5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Police
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Police
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
311 |
6.3% |
0.063404689 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
1884 |
38.4% |
0.384097859 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1360 |
27.7% |
0.277268094 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
385 |
7.8% |
0.078491335 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
434 |
8.8% |
0.088481142 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
174 |
3.5% |
0.035474006 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
96 |
2.0% |
0.019571865 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
34 |
0.7% |
0.006931702 |
| 97 |
No answer |
227 |
4.6% |
0.046279307 |
w01_dt5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Media
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
32 |
0.7% |
0.006523955 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
327 |
6.7% |
0.066666667 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1264 |
25.8% |
0.257696228 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
927 |
18.9% |
0.188990826 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
1313 |
26.8% |
0.267686035 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
552 |
11.3% |
0.112538226 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
211 |
4.3% |
0.043017329 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
44 |
0.9% |
0.008970438 |
| 97 |
No answer |
235 |
4.8% |
0.047910296 |
w01_dt5_4
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Scientists
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Scientists
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
351 |
7.2% |
0.071559633 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
1813 |
37.0% |
0.369622834 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1398 |
28.5% |
0.285015291 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
651 |
13.3% |
0.132721713 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
239 |
4.9% |
0.048725790 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
53 |
1.1% |
0.010805301 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
31 |
0.6% |
0.006320082 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
114 |
2.3% |
0.023241590 |
| 97 |
No answer |
255 |
5.2% |
0.051987768 |
w01_dt5_5
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: NAV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
NAV
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
59 |
1.2% |
0.01202854 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
495 |
10.1% |
0.10091743 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1282 |
26.1% |
0.26136595 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
880 |
17.9% |
0.17940877 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
901 |
18.4% |
0.18369011 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
504 |
10.3% |
0.10275229 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
409 |
8.3% |
0.08338430 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
146 |
3.0% |
0.02976555 |
| 97 |
No answer |
229 |
4.7% |
0.04668705 |
w01_dt5_6
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The banking sector
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The banking sector
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
143 |
2.9% |
0.02915392 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
1286 |
26.2% |
0.26218145 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1357 |
27.7% |
0.27665647 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
787 |
16.0% |
0.16044852 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
685 |
14.0% |
0.13965341 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
227 |
4.6% |
0.04627931 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
100 |
2.0% |
0.02038736 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
80 |
1.6% |
0.01630989 |
| 97 |
No answer |
240 |
4.9% |
0.04892966 |
w01_dt5_7
|
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The health services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and
players?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The health services
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
206 |
4.2% |
0.041997961 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
1730 |
35.3% |
0.352701325 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1529 |
31.2% |
0.311722732 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
358 |
7.3% |
0.072986748 |
| 5 |
Some mistrust |
566 |
11.5% |
0.115392457 |
| 6 |
High mistrust |
189 |
3.9% |
0.038532110 |
| 7 |
Very high mistrust |
76 |
1.5% |
0.015494393 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
26 |
0.5% |
0.005300714 |
| 97 |
No answer |
225 |
4.6% |
0.045871560 |
w01_k31_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The state should reduce income inequality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The state should contribute to reducing inequalities in income in
society
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
867 |
17.7% |
0.17675841 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1152 |
23.5% |
0.23486239 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1205 |
24.6% |
0.24566769 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
459 |
9.4% |
0.09357798 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
497 |
10.1% |
0.10132518 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
375 |
7.6% |
0.07645260 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
151 |
3.1% |
0.03078491 |
| 97 |
No answer |
199 |
4.1% |
0.04057085 |
w01_k31_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Better with diversity of religions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different
religions and views on life.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
462 |
9.4% |
0.09418960 |
| 2 |
Agree |
957 |
19.5% |
0.19510703 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1001 |
20.4% |
0.20407747 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
645 |
13.1% |
0.13149847 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
730 |
14.9% |
0.14882773 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
542 |
11.0% |
0.11049949 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
366 |
7.5% |
0.07461774 |
| 97 |
No answer |
202 |
4.1% |
0.04118247 |
w01_k31_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Emission reductions should be made abroad
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Most of the emission reductions Norway is committed to should be made
abroad.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
175 |
3.6% |
0.03567788 |
| 2 |
Agree |
388 |
7.9% |
0.07910296 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
611 |
12.5% |
0.12456677 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1389 |
28.3% |
0.28318043 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
788 |
16.1% |
0.16065240 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
868 |
17.7% |
0.17696228 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
446 |
9.1% |
0.09092762 |
| 97 |
No answer |
240 |
4.9% |
0.04892966 |
w01_k14_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politics is complicated
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me have no
understanding of what it’s about.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
275 |
5.6% |
0.05606524 |
| 2 |
Agree |
665 |
13.6% |
0.13557594 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1340 |
27.3% |
0.27319062 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
444 |
9.1% |
0.09051988 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
697 |
14.2% |
0.14209990 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
947 |
19.3% |
0.19306830 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
339 |
6.9% |
0.06911315 |
| 97 |
No answer |
198 |
4.0% |
0.04036697 |
w01_k14_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Can vote, not much else to influence
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
People like me can vote, but there is nothing else we can do to
influence politics.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
278 |
5.7% |
0.05667686 |
| 2 |
Agree |
640 |
13.0% |
0.13047910 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
759 |
15.5% |
0.15474006 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
354 |
7.2% |
0.07217125 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
984 |
20.1% |
0.20061162 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1184 |
24.1% |
0.24138634 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
501 |
10.2% |
0.10214067 |
| 97 |
No answer |
205 |
4.2% |
0.04179409 |
w01_k15_99
|
Variable label:
|
Trust people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now to a more general question:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you agree that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
believe that one can’t be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
0 means “Can’t be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be
trusted.”
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Can't be careful enough |
79 |
1.6% |
0.01610601 |
| 1 |
1 |
60 |
1.2% |
0.01223242 |
| 2 |
2 |
122 |
2.5% |
0.02487258 |
| 3 |
3 |
223 |
4.5% |
0.04546381 |
| 4 |
4 |
266 |
5.4% |
0.05423038 |
| 5 |
5 |
527 |
10.7% |
0.10744139 |
| 6 |
6 |
516 |
10.5% |
0.10519878 |
| 7 |
7 |
1079 |
22.0% |
0.21997961 |
| 8 |
8 |
961 |
19.6% |
0.19592253 |
| 9 |
9 |
435 |
8.9% |
0.08868502 |
| 10 |
10 - Most people can be trusted |
409 |
8.3% |
0.08338430 |
| 97 |
No answer |
228 |
4.6% |
0.04648318 |
w01_k16_1
|
Variable label:
|
Has an opinion on most issues
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do the following statements apply to you as a person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have an opinion on most things
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Apply very well |
525 |
10.7% |
0.107033639 |
| 2 |
Apply well |
1776 |
36.2% |
0.362079511 |
| 3 |
Apply somewhat well |
1610 |
32.8% |
0.328236493 |
| 4 |
Apply neither well nor poorly |
457 |
9.3% |
0.093170234 |
| 5 |
Apply somewhat poorly |
261 |
5.3% |
0.053211009 |
| 6 |
Apply poorly |
85 |
1.7% |
0.017329256 |
| 7 |
Apply very poorly |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001223242 |
| 97 |
No answer |
185 |
3.8% |
0.037716616 |
w01_k16_2
|
Variable label:
|
Strong opinions, also regarding new issues
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do the following statements apply to you as a person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have strong opinions, either positive or negative, including on issues
that are new to me
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Apply very well |
191 |
3.9% |
0.03893986 |
| 2 |
Apply well |
749 |
15.3% |
0.15270133 |
| 3 |
Apply somewhat well |
1335 |
27.2% |
0.27217125 |
| 4 |
Apply neither well nor poorly |
1055 |
21.5% |
0.21508665 |
| 5 |
Apply somewhat poorly |
787 |
16.0% |
0.16044852 |
| 6 |
Apply poorly |
453 |
9.2% |
0.09235474 |
| 7 |
Apply very poorly |
104 |
2.1% |
0.02120285 |
| 97 |
No answer |
231 |
4.7% |
0.04709480 |
w01_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes independently from U
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes into three groups and selects one of the following questions:
KM1, KM2, KM3
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4780] [Invalid:125]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1607 |
33.6% |
0.3361925 |
| 2 |
|
1601 |
33.5% |
0.3349372 |
| 3 |
|
1572 |
32.9% |
0.3288703 |
| Sysmiss |
|
125 |
|
NA |
w01_km1
|
Variable label:
|
Heard the argument: Climate change a threat, but we should continue to
extract oil as usual
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard or read the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Climate change is a very serious threat, and a lot more must be done to
prevent it. Norway should nevertheless continue to produce as much oil
as we currently do, because the world needs energy.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I have heard or read this. |
609 |
76.5% |
0.76507538 |
| 2 |
No, I have not heard or read this |
175 |
22.0% |
0.21984925 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01507538 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4109 |
|
NA |
w01_km2
|
Variable label:
|
Heard the argument: Climate change a threat and we should reduce oil
extraction
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard or read the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Climate change is a very serious threat, and a lot more must be done to
prevent it. This means that Norway should produce less oil than we
currently do, because a large share of the world’s fossil fuel must
remain unused.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I have heard or read this. |
653 |
82.2% |
0.82241814 |
| 2 |
No, I have not heard or read this |
127 |
16.0% |
0.15994962 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.8% |
0.01763224 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4111 |
|
NA |
w01_km3
|
Variable label:
|
Heard the argument: Climate change is not a threat and we should
continue to extract oil as usual
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard or read the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Climate change is a not a serious threat, and too much is being done to
prevent it. This means that Norway should continue to produce as much
oil as we currently do, because the world needs energy.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I have heard or read this. |
490 |
62.3% |
0.62340967 |
| 2 |
No, I have not heard or read this |
280 |
35.6% |
0.35623410 |
