Codebook

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Round 11

v-102 - 2023-11-06









Produced by ideas2evidence










Citation

Primary investigators

Name Affiliation
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten Coordinator, University of Bergen
Stefan Dahlberg, Erla Løvseth, Sveinung Arnesen, Yvette Peters, Erik Knudsen, Lise Bjånesøy, Susanne Bygnes, Endre Tvinnereim, Gisela Böhm, Kristine Bærøe, Cornelius Cappelen, and Marta Eidheim Scientific team, University of Bergen and UNI Research Rokkan Centre

Producers

Name Affiliation Role
Asle Høgestøl ideas2evidence Coordinator
Øivind Skjervheim ideas2evidence Coordinator
Olav Bjørnebekk ideas2evidence Project Team Member
Jostein Ryssevik ideas2evidence Quality Assurance

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no

Scope

Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in four waves, wave 1, wave 3, wave 8 and wave 11. In wave 1, 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave 11, 2069 panel members were recruited.

In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn.

This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.

14 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.

Mode of Data Collection

The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment.

Recruitment of new members to the panel was completed in several steps.

First, an invitation letter was sent to everyone in the sample. The invitation letter contained the following information: a) description of the project; b) current privacy and procedural privacy guidelines; c) timeframe for the project; d) participants right to opt out of the panel; e) contact information to the project mangers ; f) a unique login code and URL for the Norwegian Citizens’ Panel’s website; g) estimated time to complete the survey (15 minutes).

To maximize the recruitment rate, an incentive has been used in the form of a travel gift card. The value of the travel gift card is 25,000 NOK. To participate in the drawing of the gift card, it is required that the e-mail address is provided. Information about the lottery is included in all correspondence with the respondents.

The letter of invitation was mailed in on March 2, 2018.

Respondents were then reminded of the survey by text message or postcard. Respondents with a registered phone number were initially divided into two groups where one group received a reminder via text message and the other group received the reminder by postcard. The purpose here was to investigate which method had the greatest impact on response rate. Respondents without a registered phone number, however, only received the reminder by postcard.

The reminder went to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. The post card was mailed in on March 12, 2018. Reminder via text message was sent on March 15, 2018. Respondents were invited to attend the Norwegian Citizens’ Panel with reference to the letter of invitation. The login code was also given in reminder cards, while in text message a direct link was given to the survey.

Data collection among old panel members was done in parallel with the recruitment of new respondents. Invitation mail was sent on March 7, 2018. First, second and third reminders was sent to the respondents’ e-mail, on 12th, 16th and 21st of March, 2018.

Weighting

To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire. 3.3 percent of the net sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different weights have been calculated:

When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.

We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.

Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.


Change Log

Version Release date / Date changed Variable Changes and notes
v-102 2023-11-06 NA Revised release of round 11
NA 2023-11-02 r11_Weight4 New variable: Added r11_Weight4
NA 2023-11-02 r11_Weight4 Variable documentation inserted
v-101 2020-06-15 NA Revised release of round 11
NA 2019-08-12 r11pktilfreds3 Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
NA 2019-08-12 r11pktilfreds4 Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
NA 2019-08-12 r11pktilfreds1 Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
NA 2019-03-27 r11bk40_recode Added variable based on r11k40.
NA 2019-01-22 r11bk21_kodet New variable based on r11bk21.
NA 2019-01-21 r11bk33_kodet New variable based on r11bk33.
NA 2019-01-20 r11bk27_kodet New variable based on r11bk27.
NA 2019-01-19 r11bk26_kodet New variable based on r11bk26.
v-100 2018-04-17 NA Initial release of round 11


Dataset contents

File name Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 11 - v-102-O.sav
Distribution type Public
# Cases 8382
# Variables 109


Variable Documentation

responseid


Variable label: responseid
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11interview_start


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
Technical description: [Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11interview_end


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
Technical description: [Date and time of when the respondentn completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11u


Variable label: [Thematical sub-group from wave 1-7 ]
Technical description: In wave 11 this background variable is mainly used to decide who gets MEME-questions. If u=4 the respondents gets r11meme20 and r11meme21.?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4065] [Invalid:4317] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 U1 1043 25.7% 0.2565806
2 U2 1013 24.9% 0.2492005
3 U3 993 24.4% 0.2442804
4 U4 1016 25.0% 0.2499385
Sysmiss 4317 NA


r11v


Variable label: [Thematical sub-group from wave 8 ]
Technical description: If v=4 the respondent gets r11meme20 and r11meme21.?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6323] [Invalid:2059] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 v1 1658 26.2% 0.2622173
2 v2 1610 25.5% 0.2546260
3 v3 1506 23.8% 0.2381781
4 v4 1549 24.5% 0.2449786
Sysmiss 2059 NA


r11rekruttert


Variable label: [The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
Technical description: [The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Wave 1 1913 22.8% 0.2282272
2 Wave 3 2152 25.7% 0.2567406
3 Wave 8 2258 26.9% 0.2693868
4 Wave 11 2059 24.6% 0.2456454


r11browsertype


Variable label: [Browser type used by respondent ]
Technical description: [Browertype used by respondent ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11browserversion


Variable label: [Browser version used by respondent ]
Technical description: [Browser version used by respondent ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11mobil


Variable label: [Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
Technical description: [Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 other 5893 70.3% 0.7030542
1 mobile 2489 29.7% 0.2969458


r11opplosning


Variable label: [Screen resolution of the applied device ]
Technical description: [Screen resolution of the applied device ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11enhetstype


Variable label: [Determines respondents device type. ]
Technical description: [Determines respondents device type. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 PC/Mac/Tablet 6024 71.9% 0.718682892
2 Touch (iPhone/iPod Touch/Android phones) 2332 27.8% 0.278215223
3 Generic 26 0.3% 0.003101885


r11advancedwifeaturesenabled


Variable label: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
Technical description: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11pk1


Variable label: Interest in politics
Literal question: In general, how interested are you in politics?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 1116 13.3% 0.133142448
2 Interested 4015 47.9% 0.479002625
3 Somewhat interested 2533 30.2% 0.302195180
4 Not very interested 615 7.3% 0.073371510
5 Not interested at all 88 1.0% 0.010498688
97 Not answered 15 0.2% 0.001789549


r11km_livsstil_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Chooses r11km_livsstil_1 or r11km_livsstil_2]
Technical description: [Randomizes if rekruttert = 1 or rekruttert = 2. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4065] [Invalid:4317] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Gets r11km_livsstil_1 2019 49.7% 0.496679
2 Gets r11km_livsstil_2 2046 50.3% 0.503321
Sysmiss 4317 NA


r11km_livsstil_1


Variable label: Open text: Individuals must contribute to limiting climate change by changing way of life [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text: To prevent or limit harmful climate change, it is argued from time to time that we as individuals must contribute by changing our way of life.
Literal question: We would like you to give us your opinion on this. All replies would be welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
Technical description:

[Asked if r11km_livsstil_ran = 1. ]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11km_livsstil_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Individuals should help limit climate change by changing way of life
Pre-question text: To prevent or limit harmful climate change, it is argued from time to time that we as individuals must contribute by changing our way of life.
Literal question: Do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description: [Asked if r11km_livsstil_ran = 2. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Agree 1804 88.2% 0.88172043
2 Disagree 221 10.8% 0.10801564
97 Not answered 21 1.0% 0.01026393
98 Not asked 6336 NA


r11km_livsstil_2_txt


Variable label: Open text: [r11km_livsstil_2] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: We would like to ask you to state the reason for the answer you just gave. All replies would be welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
Technical description:

[Asked if r11km_livsstil_ran = 2. ]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11pk10


Variable label: Perception of today’s economic situation in Norway
Literal question: How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? Do you think it is:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 2154 25.7% 0.2569792412
2 Good 4766 56.9% 0.5685993796
3 Quite good 969 11.6% 0.1156048676
4 Neither good nor bad 299 3.6% 0.0356716774
5 Quite bad 133 1.6% 0.0158673348
6 Bad 38 0.5% 0.0045335242
7 Very bad 16 0.2% 0.0019088523
97 Not answered 7 0.1% 0.0008351229


r11pktilfreds3


Variable label: How satisfied with: the Norwegian government
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 595 7.1% 0.070985445
2 Satisfied 2817 33.6% 0.336077309
3 Somewhat satisfied 2574 30.7% 0.307086614
4 Not very satisfied 1736 20.7% 0.207110475
5 Not satisfied at all 639 7.6% 0.076234789
97 Not answered 21 0.3% 0.002505369


r11pktilfreds4


Variable label: How satisfied with: the way democracy works in Norway
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 1262 15.1% 0.150560725
2 Satisfied 4514 53.9% 0.538534956
3 Somewhat satisfied 1886 22.5% 0.225005965
4 Not very satisfied 564 6.7% 0.067287044
5 Not satisfied at all 102 1.2% 0.012168933
97 Not answered 54 0.6% 0.006442377


r11pk9_1


Variable label: Open text: Most important political issue 1 [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11pk9_2


Variable label: Open text: Most important political issue 2 [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11pk9_3


Variable label: Open text: Most important political issue 3 [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11pk8_1


Variable label: Personal placement on political axis left-right
Pre-question text: In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are politically on the far left, and 10 represents those who are politically on the far right.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 Left 30 1.5% 0.01457018
2 1 71 3.4% 0.03448276
3 2 184 8.9% 0.08936377
4 3 292 14.2% 0.14181642
5 4 234 11.4% 0.11364740
6 5 379 18.4% 0.18406994
7 6 211 10.2% 0.10247693
8 7 271 13.2% 0.13161729
9 8 232 11.3% 0.11267606
10 9 80 3.9% 0.03885381
11 10 Right 46 2.2% 0.02234094
97 Not answered 29 1.4% 0.01408451
98 Not asked 6323 NA


r11bk3


Variable label: Voted this party in parliamentary elections of 2017
Literal question: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 64 3.1% 0.03108305
2 The Conservative Party 469 22.8% 0.22778048
3 The Progress Party 193 9.4% 0.09373482
4 The Liberal Party 108 5.2% 0.05245265
5 The Soialist Left Party 120 5.8% 0.05828072
6 The Centre Party 174 8.5% 0.08450704
7 The Green Party 99 4.8% 0.04808159
8 The Labour Party 440 21.4% 0.21369597
9 The Red Party 66 3.2% 0.03205440
10 Did not vote 103 5.0% 0.05002428
11 Not entitled to vote 156 7.6% 0.07576493
12 Other: 48 2.3% 0.02331229
97 Not answered 19 0.9% 0.00922778
98 Not asked 6323 NA


r11bk3_12_other


Variable label: Other: [r11bk3] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
Technical description:

[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11pk204


Variable label: Would vote this party if parliamentary elections held tomorrow
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 313 3.7% 0.037341923
2 The Conservative Party 2134 25.5% 0.254593176
3 The Progress Party 753 9.0% 0.089835361
4 The Liberal Party 390 4.7% 0.046528275
5 The Soialist Left Party 792 9.4% 0.094488189
6 The Centre Party 846 10.1% 0.100930565
7 The Green Party 349 4.2% 0.041636841
8 The Labour Party 1607 19.2% 0.191720353
9 The Red Party 407 4.9% 0.048556430
10 Did not vote 252 3.0% 0.030064424
11 Not entitled to vote 210 2.5% 0.025053686
12 Other: 264 3.1% 0.031496063
97 Not answered 65 0.8% 0.007754712


r11pk204_12_other


Variable label: Other: [r11pk204] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11pk6_1


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Christian Democrats
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 872 10.4% 0.10403245
2 Really dislike 1384 16.5% 0.16511572
3 Dislike somwehat 2044 24.4% 0.24385588
4 Neither dislike nor like 1975 23.6% 0.23562396
5 Like somewhat 1426 17.0% 0.17012646
6 Really like 417 5.0% 0.04974946
7 Intensely like 99 1.2% 0.01181102
97 Not answered 165 2.0% 0.01968504


r11pk6_2


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 341 4.1% 0.04068241
2 Really dislike 1026 12.2% 0.12240515
3 Dislike somwehat 1473 17.6% 0.17573372
4 Neither dislike nor like 963 11.5% 0.11488905
5 Like somewhat 1949 23.3% 0.23252207
6 Really like 1910 22.8% 0.22786924
7 Intensely like 580 6.9% 0.06919590
97 Not answered 140 1.7% 0.01670246


r11pk6_3


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Progress Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 2608 31.1% 0.31114293
2 Really dislike 1448 17.3% 0.17275113
3 Dislike somwehat 1082 12.9% 0.12908614
4 Neither dislike nor like 732 8.7% 0.08732999
5 Like somewhat 1289 15.4% 0.15378191
6 Really like 788 9.4% 0.09401098
7 Intensely like 306 3.7% 0.03650680
97 Not answered 129 1.5% 0.01539012


r11pk6_4


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 748 8.9% 0.08923885
2 Really dislike 1232 14.7% 0.14698163
3 Dislike somwehat 1839 21.9% 0.21939871
4 Neither dislike nor like 2023 24.1% 0.24135051
5 Like somewhat 1729 20.6% 0.20627535
6 Really like 539 6.4% 0.06430446
7 Intensely like 95 1.1% 0.01133381
97 Not answered 177 2.1% 0.02111668


r11pk6_5


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Social Left Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1104 13.2% 0.13171081
2 Really dislike 1343 16.0% 0.16022429
3 Dislike somwehat 1401 16.7% 0.16714388
4 Neither dislike nor like 1456 17.4% 0.17370556
5 Like somewhat 1537 18.3% 0.18336912
6 Really like 1040 12.4% 0.12407540
7 Intensely like 326 3.9% 0.03889287
97 Not answered 175 2.1% 0.02087807


r11pk6_6


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Centre Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 446 5.3% 0.05320926
2 Really dislike 855 10.2% 0.10200429
3 Dislike somwehat 1492 17.8% 0.17800048
4 Neither dislike nor like 2178 26.0% 0.25984252
5 Like somewhat 2059 24.6% 0.24564543
6 Really like 919 11.0% 0.10963970
7 Intensely like 264 3.1% 0.03149606
97 Not answered 169 2.0% 0.02016225


r11pk6_7


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Green Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1697 20.2% 0.20245765
2 Really dislike 1213 14.5% 0.14471487
3 Dislike somwehat 1365 16.3% 0.16284896
4 Neither dislike nor like 1365 16.3% 0.16284896
5 Like somewhat 1653 19.7% 0.19720830
6 Really like 736 8.8% 0.08780721
7 Intensely like 185 2.2% 0.02207110
97 Not answered 168 2.0% 0.02004295


r11pk6_8


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Labour Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 487 5.8% 0.05810069
2 Really dislike 857 10.2% 0.10224290
3 Dislike somwehat 1477 17.6% 0.17621093
4 Neither dislike nor like 1298 15.5% 0.15485564
5 Like somewhat 2294 27.4% 0.27368170
6 Really like 1481 17.7% 0.17668814
7 Intensely like 352 4.2% 0.04199475
97 Not answered 136 1.6% 0.01622524


r11pk6_9


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Red Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1802 21.5% 0.21498449
2 Really dislike 1355 16.2% 0.16165593
3 Dislike somwehat 1179 14.1% 0.14065855
4 Neither dislike nor like 1617 19.3% 0.19291339
5 Like somewhat 1321 15.8% 0.15759962
6 Really like 650 7.8% 0.07754712
7 Intensely like 249 3.0% 0.02970651
97 Not answered 209 2.5% 0.02493438


r11pktilfreds1


Variable label: How satisfied with: Life in general
Literal question: All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 2860 34.1% 0.341207349
2 Satisfied 4522 53.9% 0.539489382
3 Somewhat satisfied 794 9.5% 0.094726796
4 Not very satisfied 139 1.7% 0.016583154
5 Not satisfied at all 35 0.4% 0.004175614
97 Not answered 32 0.4% 0.003817705


r11pk15_1


Variable label: Other people’s trustworthiness
Literal question: Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Cannot be careful enough 86 1.0% 0.010260081
1 1 67 0.8% 0.007993319
2 2 146 1.7% 0.017418277
3 3 295 3.5% 0.035194464
4 4 348 4.2% 0.041517538
5 5 775 9.2% 0.092460033
6 6 865 10.3% 0.103197328
7 7 1928 23.0% 0.230016702
8 8 2102 25.1% 0.250775471
9 9 973 11.6% 0.116082081
10 10 – Most people can be trusted 772 9.2% 0.092102124
97 Not answered 25 0.3% 0.002982582


r11bktivi_1


Variable label: Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 215 2.6% 0.02565020
2 2 - Does not resemble me 629 7.5% 0.07504176
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1413 16.9% 0.16857552
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 3053 36.4% 0.36423288
5 5 - Resembles me 2134 25.5% 0.25459318
6 6 - Very much resembles me 813 9.7% 0.09699356
97 Not answered 125 1.5% 0.01491291


r11bktivi_2


Variable label: Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 4034 48.1% 0.48126939
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1716 20.5% 0.20472441
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1149 13.7% 0.13707946
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 816 9.7% 0.09735147
5 5 - Resembles me 379 4.5% 0.04521594
6 6 - Very much resembles me 182 2.2% 0.02171319
97 Not answered 106 1.3% 0.01264615


r11bktivi_3


Variable label: Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her]. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 27 0.3% 0.003221188
2 2 - Does not resemble me 102 1.2% 0.012168933
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 509 6.1% 0.060725364
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2996 35.7% 0.357432594
5 5 - Resembles me 3089 36.9% 0.368527798
6 6 - Very much resembles me 1550 18.5% 0.184920067
97 Not answered 109 1.3% 0.013004056


r11bktivi_4


Variable label: Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 69 0.8% 0.008231926
2 2 - Does not resemble me 214 2.6% 0.025530900
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 547 6.5% 0.065258888
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2333 27.8% 0.278334526
5 5 - Resembles me 3042 36.3% 0.362920544
6 6 - Very much resembles me 2067 24.7% 0.246599857
97 Not answered 110 1.3% 0.013123360


r11bktivi_5


Variable label: Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 45 0.5% 0.005368647
2 2 - Does not resemble me 170 2.0% 0.020281556
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 719 8.6% 0.085779050
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2922 34.9% 0.348604152
5 5 - Resembles me 2872 34.3% 0.342638988
6 6 - Very much resembles me 1547 18.5% 0.184562157
97 Not answered 107 1.3% 0.012765450


r11bktivi_6


Variable label: Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 765 9.1% 0.09126700
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1745 20.8% 0.20818420
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 2788 33.3% 0.33261751
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2118 25.3% 0.25268432
5 5 - Resembles me 677 8.1% 0.08076831
6 6 - Very much resembles me 182 2.2% 0.02171319
97 Not answered 107 1.3% 0.01276545


r11bktivi_7


Variable label: Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 303 3.6% 0.03614889
2 2 - Does not resemble me 954 11.4% 0.11381532
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 2330 27.8% 0.27797662
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 3190 38.1% 0.38057743
5 5 - Resembles me 1153 13.8% 0.13755667
6 6 - Very much resembles me 339 4.0% 0.04044381
97 Not answered 113 1.3% 0.01348127


r11bktivi_8


Variable label: Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 877 10.5% 0.10462897
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1732 20.7% 0.20663326
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 2629 31.4% 0.31364829
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2100 25.1% 0.25053686
5 5 - Resembles me 715 8.5% 0.08530184
6 6 - Very much resembles me 216 2.6% 0.02576951
97 Not answered 113 1.3% 0.01348127


r11bktivi_9


Variable label: Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 924 11.0% 0.11023622
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1722 20.5% 0.20544023
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 2661 31.7% 0.31746600
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2249 26.8% 0.26831305
5 5 - Resembles me 595 7.1% 0.07098545
6 6 - Very much resembles me 120 1.4% 0.01431639
97 Not answered 111 1.3% 0.01324266


r11bktivi_10


Variable label: Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 127 1.5% 0.01515152
2 2 - Does not resemble me 452 5.4% 0.05392508
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1170 14.0% 0.13958482
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2841 33.9% 0.33894059
5 5 - Resembles me 2401 28.6% 0.28644715
6 6 - Very much resembles me 1289 15.4% 0.15378191
97 Not answered 102 1.2% 0.01216893


r11pk53


Variable label: Confidence in Norwegian politicians
Literal question: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 97 1.2% 0.011572417
2 To a great extent 2228 26.6% 0.265807683
3 To some extent 4532 54.1% 0.540682415
4 To a small extent 1268 15.1% 0.151276545
5 Not at all 189 2.3% 0.022548318
97 Not answered 68 0.8% 0.008112622


r11pk54


Variable label: Confidence in Norwegian news media
Literal question: Generally speaking, what degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 246 2.9% 0.02934860
2 To a great extent 2976 35.5% 0.35504653
3 To some extent 3947 47.1% 0.47089000
4 To a small extent 902 10.8% 0.10761155
5 Not at all 204 2.4% 0.02433787
97 Not answered 107 1.3% 0.01276545


r11pk12


Variable label: Confidence in Norwegian parliament
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 312 3.7% 0.03722262
2 To a great extent 3329 39.7% 0.39716058
3 To some extent 3702 44.2% 0.44166070
4 To a small extent 788 9.4% 0.09401098
5 Not at all 157 1.9% 0.01873061
97 Not answered 94 1.1% 0.01121451


r11pk55


Variable label: The number of municipalities should be reduced further by merging
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question: From the year 2020, Norway will have 356 municipalities instead of 422 as of today. The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 909 10.8% 0.108446671
2 Agree 1421 17.0% 0.169529945
3 Agree somewhat 1519 18.1% 0.181221665
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1546 18.4% 0.184442854
5 Disagree somewhat 1012 12.1% 0.120734908
6 Disagree 1114 13.3% 0.132903842
7 Strongly disagree 779 9.3% 0.092937246
97 Not answered 82 1.0% 0.009782868


r11pk60


Variable label: The government should work towards recuding income differences
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question: The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income differences in society.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 2207 26.3% 0.263302314
2 Agree 2660 31.7% 0.317346695
3 Agree somewhat 1913 22.8% 0.228227153
4 Neither agree nor disagree 692 8.3% 0.082557862
5 Disagree somewhat 489 5.8% 0.058339298
6 Disagree 250 3.0% 0.029825817
7 Strongly disagree 73 0.9% 0.008709139
97 Not answered 98 1.2% 0.011691720


r11pkby3


Variable label: Fears new terrorist attack in Norway
Literal question: To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 554 6.6% 0.066094011
2 Slightly 3245 38.7% 0.387139108
3 Somewhat 3237 38.6% 0.386184681
4 To a great extent 1004 12.0% 0.119780482
5 To a very great extent 260 3.1% 0.031018850
97 Not answered 82 1.0% 0.009782868


r11pk52


Variable label: Government should protect citizens from terrorism even at expense of privacy
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question: The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 710 8.5% 0.084705321
2 Agree 1749 20.9% 0.208661417
3 Agree somewhat 2314 27.6% 0.276067764
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1040 12.4% 0.124075400
5 Disagree somewhat 1085 12.9% 0.129444047
6 Disagree 935 11.2% 0.111548556
7 Strongly disagree 466 5.6% 0.055595323
97 Not answered 83 1.0% 0.009902171


r11pkkm2_ran


Variable label: [Chooses variation of question r11pkkm2]
Technical description: [Randomizes all respondents ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8320] [Invalid:62] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Gets r11pkkm2_1 2100 25.2% 0.2524038
2 Gets r11pkkm2_2 2098 25.2% 0.2521635
3 Gets r11pkkm2_3 2052 24.7% 0.2466346
4 Gets r11pkkm2_4 2070 24.9% 0.2487981
Sysmiss 62 NA


r11pkkm2_1


Variable label: How concerned about climate change: Variant 1
Literal question: How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description: [Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3, and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran =1. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all concerned 100 4.8% 0.047619048
2 Not particularly concerned 394 18.8% 0.187619048
3 Somewhat concerned 652 31.0% 0.310476190
4 Concerned 663 31.6% 0.315714286
5 Very concerned 286 13.6% 0.136190476
97 Not answered 5 0.2% 0.002380952
98 Not asked 6282 NA


r11pkkm2_2


Variable label: How concerned about climate change: Variant 2
Literal question: How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description: [Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3, and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran = 2. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all concerned 98 4.7% 0.0467111535
2 Not very concerned 444 21.2% 0.2116301239
3 Slightly concerned 860 41.0% 0.4099142040
4 Very concerned 609 29.0% 0.2902764538
5 Extremely concerned 85 4.1% 0.0405147760
97 Not answered 2 0.1% 0.0009532888
98 Not asked 6284 NA


r11pkkm2_3


Variable label: How concerned about climate change: Variant 3
Literal question: How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description: [Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3, and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran = 3. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all concerned 92 4.5% 0.044834308
2 Not particularly concerned 358 17.4% 0.174463938
3 Slightly concerned 897 43.7% 0.437134503
4 Very concerned 631 30.8% 0.307504873
5 Extremely concerned 69 3.4% 0.033625731
97 Not answered 5 0.2% 0.002436647
98 Not asked 6330 NA


r11pkkm2_4


Variable label: How concerned about climate change: Variant 4
Literal question: How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description: [Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3, and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all concerned 95 4.6% 0.045893720
2 Not particularly concerned 321 15.5% 0.155072464
3 Slightly concerned 825 39.9% 0.398550725
4 Rather concerned 585 28.3% 0.282608696
5 Very concerned 241 11.6% 0.116425121
97 Not answered 3 0.1% 0.001449275
98 Not asked 6312 NA


r11pkkm42


Variable label: Should/should not be possible to buy diesel- and petrol cars after 2025
Pre-question text: The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
Literal question: Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
Post-question: Link: Look at “Nasjonal Transportplan 2018-2029”, p. 16, available here (external link)
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In 2025 all new private vehicles sold should either be electric or run on hydrogen 3536 42.2% 0.42185636
2 In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars which run on diesel or petrol 4667 55.7% 0.55678836
97 Not answered 179 2.1% 0.02135529


r11pkkm4


Variable label: Should/should not allow oil and gas extraction in Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja
Pre-question text: Please look at the statement below.
Literal question: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja areas. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 2580 30.8% 0.30780243
2 Agree 1425 17.0% 0.17000716
3 Agree somewhat 1002 12.0% 0.11954188
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1267 15.1% 0.15115724
5 Disagree somewhat 784 9.4% 0.09353376
6 Disagree 744 8.9% 0.08876163
7 Strongly disagree 475 5.7% 0.05666905
97 Not answered 105 1.3% 0.01252684


r11pkmeme9


Variable label: Access to asylum in Norway
Literal question: What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much easier 230 2.7% 0.02743975
2 Easier 856 10.2% 0.10212360
3 Somewhat easier 1624 19.4% 0.19374851
4 Same as today 2807 33.5% 0.33488428
5 Slightly more difficult 1214 14.5% 0.14483417
6 More difficult 827 9.9% 0.09866380
7 Much more difficult 706 8.4% 0.08422811
97 Not answered 118 1.4% 0.01407779


r11pkdv5


Variable label: How good or bad that immigrants come to live in Norway
Literal question: In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very great advantage 221 2.6% 0.02636602
2 Great advantage 1111 13.3% 0.13254593
3 Slightly advantageous 2867 34.2% 0.34204247
4 Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage 1532 18.3% 0.18277261
5 A slight disadvantage 1635 19.5% 0.19506084
6 A great disadvantage 580 6.9% 0.06919590
7 Very great disadvantage 324 3.9% 0.03865426
97 Not answered 112 1.3% 0.01336197


r11pkdv55


Variable label: Muslim religious schools should be possible
Pre-question text: Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith.
Literal question: How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 214 2.6% 0.02553090
2 Agree 751 9.0% 0.08959675
3 Agree somewhat 993 11.8% 0.11846815
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1414 16.9% 0.16869482
5 Disagree somewhat 1100 13.1% 0.13123360
6 Disagree 1696 20.2% 0.20233834
7 Strongly disagree 2099 25.0% 0.25041756
97 Not answered 115 1.4% 0.01371988


r11pkby2


Variable label: Safety in local environment past few years
Pre-question text: Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
Literal question: How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much safer 93 1.1% 0.01109520
2 Somewhat safer 447 5.3% 0.05332856
3 No change in safety 5846 69.7% 0.69744691
4 Somewhat more unsafe 1634 19.5% 0.19494154
5 Much more unsafe 256 3.1% 0.03054164
97 Not answered 106 1.3% 0.01264615


r11guns


Variable label: Norwegian police should be armed
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norwegian police should be armed?
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert =1 eller 2, and if v or u = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 303 13.2% 0.13168188
2 Agree 451 19.6% 0.19600174
3 Agree somewhat 569 24.7% 0.24728379
4 Neither agree nor disagree 177 7.7% 0.07692308
5 Disagree somewhat 240 10.4% 0.10430248
6 Disagree 312 13.6% 0.13559322
7 Strongly disagree 222 9.6% 0.09647979
97 Not answered 27 1.2% 0.01173403
98 Not asked 6081 NA


r11meme20_ran


Variable label: [Text substitution R11MEME20: mother of infant/father of an infant]
Technical description: [Randomizes if u =4 eller v = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2316] [Invalid:6066] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Gets "mother of infant" 1135 49.0% 0.4900691
2 Gets "father of infant" 1181 51.0% 0.5099309
Sysmiss 6066 NA


r11meme20


Variable label: Possible to be [mother/father] of infant and get ahead in working life
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
Literal question: In Norway today it is practically possible to be a good [mother of infant/father of an infant] and at the same time get ahead in working life.
Technical description: [Asked if u =4 eller v = 4. Question wording depends on the randomized value of r11meme20_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 237 10.1% 0.101412067
2 Agree 987 42.2% 0.422336329
3 Agree somewhat 543 23.2% 0.232349166
4 Neither agree nor disagree 221 9.5% 0.094565682
5 Disagree somewhat 210 9.0% 0.089858793
6 Disagree 89 3.8% 0.038083012
7 Strongly disagree 22 0.9% 0.009413778
97 Not answered 28 1.2% 0.011981172
98 Not asked 6045 NA


r11meme21


Variable label: It is women’s responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
Technical description: [Asked if u =4 eller v = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 43 1.8% 0.01839966
2 Agree 90 3.9% 0.03851091
3 Agree somewhat 396 16.9% 0.16944801
4 Neither agree nor disagree 258 11.0% 0.11039795
5 Disagree somewhat 320 13.7% 0.13692769
6 Disagree 657 28.1% 0.28112965
7 Strongly disagree 543 23.2% 0.23234917
97 Not answered 30 1.3% 0.01283697
98 Not asked 6045 NA


r11pkklasse


Variable label: Social class, self-placement
Pre-question text: We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
Literal question: If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Lower class 77 0.9% 0.009186352
2 Working class 1144 13.6% 0.136482940
3 Lower middle class 806 9.6% 0.096158435
4 Middle class 4405 52.6% 0.525530900
5 Upper middle class 1525 18.2% 0.181937485
6 Upper class 47 0.6% 0.005607254
7 Don't know 269 3.2% 0.032092579
97 Not answered 109 1.3% 0.013004056


r11bk33


Variable label: Employment situation
Literal question: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Paid work (or temporarily absent) 4721 56.3% 0.563230733
2 Studying (not paid for by an employer) 466 5.6% 0.055595323
3 Unemployed and actively seeking work 114 1.4% 0.013600573
4 Unemployed, wanting a job, but not actively seeking work 43 0.5% 0.005130041
5 Permanently ill or disabled 320 3.8% 0.038177046
6 Retired 2066 24.6% 0.246480554
7 Military service 12 0.1% 0.001431639
8 At home, looking after children or others 89 1.1% 0.010617991
9 Other: 448 5.3% 0.053447864
97 Not answered 103 1.2% 0.012288237


r11bk33_9_other


Variable label: Other: [r11bk33] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11bk33_kodet


Variable label: Employment situation [coded]
Literal question: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[This variable contains the values of r11bk33 plus coded values of r11bk33_9_other]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Paid work (or temporarily absent) 4849 57.9% 0.578501551
2 Studying (not paid for by an employer) 483 5.8% 0.057623479
3 Unemployed and actively seeking work 116 1.4% 0.013839179
4 Unemployed, wanting a job, but not actively seeking work 45 0.5% 0.005368647
5 Permanently ill or disabled 354 4.2% 0.042233357
6 Retired 2081 24.8% 0.248270103
7 Military service 12 0.1% 0.001431639
8 At home, looking after children or others 92 1.1% 0.010975901
9 Other: 247 2.9% 0.029467907
97 Not answered 103 1.2% 0.012288237


r11bk21


Variable label: Works in what type of business
Literal question: Which type of business do you work in?
Technical description: [Asked if r11bk33 = 1. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 State, county or municipal administration 534 11.3% 0.1131116289
2 Public sector (e.g. school and health services) 1425 30.2% 0.3018428299
3 Publicly owned enterprise 295 6.2% 0.0624867613
4 Private business 2111 44.7% 0.4471510273
5 Self employed 241 5.1% 0.0510485067
6 Other: 112 2.4% 0.0237237873
97 Not answered 3 0.1% 0.0006354586
98 Not asked 3661 NA


r11bk21_6_other


Variable label: Other: [r11bk21] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Which type of business do you work in?
Technical description:

[Asked if r11bk33 = 1. ]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11bk21_kodet


Variable label: Works in what type of business [coded]
Literal question: Which type of business do you work in?
Technical description:

[Asked if r11bk33 = 1. ]

[This variable contains the values of r11bk21 plus coded values of 11bk21_6_other]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 State, county or municipal administration 535 11.3% 0.1133234484
2 Public sector (e.g. school and health services) 1428 30.2% 0.3024782885
3 Publicly owned enterprise 296 6.3% 0.0626985808
4 Private business 2114 44.8% 0.4477864859
5 Self employed 241 5.1% 0.0510485067
6 Other: 104 2.2% 0.0220292311
97 Not answered 3 0.1% 0.0006354586
98 Not asked 3661 NA


r11bk26


Variable label: Highest completed education
Literal question: What is your highest completed education?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No completed education 33 0.4% 0.003937008
2 Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) 587 7.0% 0.070031019
3 Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School) 968 11.5% 0.115485564
4 Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) 1019 12.2% 0.121570031
5 Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical college) 449 5.4% 0.053567168
6 University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ years) 765 9.1% 0.091267001
7 College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) 1709 20.4% 0.203889287
8 University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) 617 7.4% 0.073610117
9 College-5-6 year education (Master, major) 529 6.3% 0.063111429
10 University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education (MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economy) 1188 14.2% 0.141732283
11 Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) 167 2.0% 0.019923646
12 None of the above (please enter): 229 2.7% 0.027320449
97 Not answered 122 1.5% 0.014554999


r11bk26_12_other


Variable label: Other: [r11bk26] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What is your highest completed education?
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11bk26_kodet


Variable label: Highest completed education [coded]
Literal question: What is your highest completed education?
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[This variable contains the values of r11bk26 plus coded values of 11bk26_12_other]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No completed education 34 0.4% 0.004056311
2 Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) 618 7.4% 0.073729420
3 Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School) 1004 12.0% 0.119780482
4 Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) 1064 12.7% 0.126938678
5 Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical college) 481 5.7% 0.057384872
6 University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ years) 769 9.2% 0.091744214
7 College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) 1717 20.5% 0.204843713
8 University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) 625 7.5% 0.074564543
9 College-5-6 year education (Master, major) 532 6.3% 0.063469339
10 University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education (MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economy) 1193 14.2% 0.142328800
11 Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) 167 2.0% 0.019923646
12 None of the above (please enter): 56 0.7% 0.006680983
97 Not answered 122 1.5% 0.014554999


r11bk27


Variable label: Marital status
Literal question: Marital status.
Post-question: Click on the one that is most relevant.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Unmarried/not cohabiting 1280 15.3% 0.152708184
2 Cohabitant 1509 18.0% 0.180028633
3 Married/legally registered partner 4566 54.5% 0.544738726
4 Divorced/separated/formally registered partner 623 7.4% 0.074325937
5 Widow/widower 238 2.8% 0.028394178
6 Other: 68 0.8% 0.008112622
97 Not answered 98 1.2% 0.011691720


r11bk27_6_other


Variable label: Other: [r11bk27] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Marital status.
Post-question: Click on the one that is most relevant.
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r11bk27_kodet


Variable label: Marital status [coded]
Literal question: Marital status.
Post-question: Click on the one that is most relevant.
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[This variable contains the values of r11bk27 plus coded values of r11bk27_6_other]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Unmarried/not cohabiting 1331 15.9% 0.158792651
2 Cohabitant 1509 18.0% 0.180028633
3 Married/legally registered partner 4568 54.5% 0.544977332
4 Divorced/separated/formally registered partner 623 7.4% 0.074325937
5 Widow/widower 238 2.8% 0.028394178
6 Other: 15 0.2% 0.001789549
97 Not answered 98 1.2% 0.011691720


r11bk25


Variable label: Gross annual income
Literal question: What is your current income?
Post-question: Gross annual income is:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 < 150 000 626 7.5% 0.07468385
2 150 001 - 300 000 1086 13.0% 0.12956335
3 300 001 - 400 000 1269 15.1% 0.15139585
4 400 001 - 500 000 1538 18.3% 0.18348843
5 500 001 - 600 000 1392 16.6% 0.16607015
6 600 001 - 700 000 866 10.3% 0.10331663
7 700 001 - 1 000 000