Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg, Erla Løvseth, Sveinung Arnesen, Yvette Peters, Erik
Knudsen, Lise Bjånesøy, Susanne Bygnes, Endre Tvinnereim, Gisela Böhm,
Kristine Bærøe, Cornelius Cappelen, and Marta Eidheim
|
Scientific team, University of Bergen and UNI Research Rokkan Centre
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project Team Member
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality Assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in four
waves, wave 1, wave 3, wave 8 and wave 11. In wave 1, 4.870 panel
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4245
new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave 11,
2069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure
of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000
individuals. In wave 11, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people
was drawn.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
14 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the
register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c)
address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment. Please refer to the Documentation Report from Wave 11. The
report is available here:
http://digsscore.uib.no/download-data-and-documentation
In wave 12, emails were sent out on June 5, 2018.
E-mail with reminder was sent out three times, June 11, June 15 and June
20, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the
survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with
registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message.
Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by e-mail.
Wave 12 ended June 25th.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights,
the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender
and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in
the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register.
Information regarding the level of education is provided by the
respondents when answering the questionnaire. 3.3 percent of the net
sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different
weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 12
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r12Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r12Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r12Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r12arbeidolje_2_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-18
|
r12arbeidolje_2_1
|
Retracted
data due to privacy concerns
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 12
|
|
NA
|
2019-03-26
|
r12km1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-03-26
|
r12km2
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-02-18
|
r12polkom1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r12meme9
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-20
|
r12arbeid_kodet
|
New variable based on r12arbeid.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-11
|
r12kreft
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
v-100
|
2018-06-28
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 12
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 12 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
7193
|
|
# Variables
|
331
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12group
|
Variable label:
|
[Subgroup in wave 12. Randomized. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Subgroup in wave 12. Randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
g1 |
1441 |
20.0% |
0.2003337 |
| 2 |
g2 |
1386 |
19.3% |
0.1926873 |
| 3 |
g3 |
1416 |
19.7% |
0.1968581 |
| 4 |
g4 |
1457 |
20.3% |
0.2025580 |
| 5 |
g5 |
1493 |
20.8% |
0.2075629 |
r12interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
1761 |
24.5% |
0.2448214 |
| 2 |
Wave 3 |
1954 |
27.2% |
0.2716530 |
| 3 |
Wave 8 |
2040 |
28.4% |
0.2836091 |
| 4 |
Wave 11 |
1438 |
20.0% |
0.1999166 |
r12browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:296]
[Range:0-68]
|
r12mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
other |
4554 |
63.3% |
0.6331155 |
| 1 |
mobile |
2639 |
36.7% |
0.3668845 |
r12opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
4663 |
64.8% |
0.648269151 |
| 2 |
Touch |
2509 |
34.9% |
0.348811344 |
| 3 |
Generic |
21 |
0.3% |
0.002919505 |
r12advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12polkom1_filter
|
Variable label:
|
[Filter variable for r12polkom1. If r12group = 4 and rekruttert = 4, the
respondents are randomized into two groups. If = 1 they get r12polkom1,
otherwise r12polkom15. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Filter variable for r12polkom1. If r12group = 4 and rekruttert = 4, the
respondents are randomized into two groups. If = 1 they get r12polkom1,
otherwise r12polkom15. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:294] [Invalid:6899]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Gets R12POLKOM15 |
142 |
48.3% |
0.4829932 |
| 1 |
Gets R12POLKOM1 |
152 |
51.7% |
0.5170068 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6899 |
|
NA |
r12polkom1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What does it mean to “trust the media”. [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People often talk about “trusting the media”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your own words, explain what you think it means to trust the media.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All replies would be
welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you
would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and rekruttert = 4 or r12group = 5 and rekruttert
= 4 or r12polkom_filter = 1 ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12polkom15_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomize if r12group = 2 or 4 and r12polkom1_filter is not equal to 1.
Randomly selects r12polkom15a, b, c, d, e or f]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomize if r12group = 2 or 4 and r12polkom1_filter is not equal to 1.
Randomly selects r12polkom15a, b, c, d, e or f]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2692] [Invalid:4501]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
R12POLKOM15A |
453 |
16.8% |
0.1682764 |
| 2 |
R12POLKOM15B |
461 |
17.1% |
0.1712481 |
| 3 |
R12POLKOM15C |
430 |
16.0% |
0.1597325 |
| 4 |
R12POLKOM15D |
452 |
16.8% |
0.1679049 |
| 5 |
R12POLKOM15E |
452 |
16.8% |
0.1679049 |
| 6 |
R12POLKOM15F |
444 |
16.5% |
0.1649331 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4501 |
|
NA |
r12polkom15a
|
Variable label:
|
Think when heard or read “environmental problems” [Large textbox.
Variation 1 of introduction text] [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think of when you hear or read the term “environmental
problems”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses
are welcome.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 2 or 4 and r12polkom1_filter is not equal to 1 and
r12polkom15_ran = 1 ] [Large textbox. Variation 1 of introduction text]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12polkom15b
|
Variable label:
|
Think when heard or read “environmental problems” [Large textbox.
Variation 2 of introduction text] [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think of when you hear or read the term “environmental
problems”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All replies would be
welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you
would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 2 or 4 and r12polkom1_filter is not equal to 1 and
r12polkom15_ran = 2 ] [Large textbox. Variation 2 of introduction text]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12polkom15c
|
Variable label:
|
Think when heard or read “environmental problems” [Large textbox.
Variation 3 of introduction text] [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think of when you hear or read the term “environmental
problems”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We ask you to spend a little while thinking about this question. Then we
would like to ask you to write a few sentences about what you think is
important when it comes to environmental problems. All types of
responses are welcome.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 2 or 4 and r12polkom1_filter is not equal to 1 and
r12polkom15_ran = 3 ] [Large textbox. Variation 3 of introduction text]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12polkom15d
|
Variable label:
|
Think when heard or read “environmental problems” [Small textbox.
Variation 1 of introduction text] [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think of when you hear or read the term “environmental
problems”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses
are welcome.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 2 or 4 and r12polkom1_filter is not equal to 1 and
r12polkom15_ran = 4 ] [Small textbox. Variation 1 of introduction text]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12polkom15e
|
Variable label:
|
Think when heard or read “environmental problems” [Small textbox.
Variation 2 of introduction text] [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think of when you hear or read the term “environmental
problems”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All replies would be
welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you
would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 2 or 4 and r12polkom1_filter is not equal to 1 and
r12polkom15_ran = 5 ] [Small textbox. Variation 2 of introduction text]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12polkom15f
|
Variable label:
|
Think when heard or read “environmental problems” [Small textbox.
Variation 3 of introduction text] [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think of when you hear or read the term “environmental
problems”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We ask you to spend a little while thinking about this question. Then we
would like to ask you to write a few sentences about what you think is
important when it comes to environmental problems. All types of
responses are welcome.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 2 or 4 and r12polkom1_filter is not equal to 1 and
r12polkom15_ran = 6 ] [Small textbox. Variation 3 of introduction text]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12helse1
|
Variable label:
|
How is your health now?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How is your health now?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
428 |
29.7% |
0.297015961 |
| 2 |
Good |
740 |
51.4% |
0.513532269 |
| 3 |
Not that good |
247 |
17.1% |
0.171408744 |
| 4 |
Poor |
20 |
1.4% |
0.013879251 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004163775 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
r12helse2
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with life now?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with life now?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
460 |
31.9% |
0.319222762 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
778 |
54.0% |
0.539902845 |
| 3 |
Not entirely satisfied |
173 |
12.0% |
0.120055517 |
| 4 |
Not satisfied |
23 |
1.6% |
0.015961138 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.004857738 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
r12helse3_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r12group = 1. Randomly selects either r12helse3_1 or
r12helse3_2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r12group = 1. Randomly selects either r12helse3_1 or
r12helse3_2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1441] [Invalid:5752]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
r12helse3_1 |
725 |
50.3% |
0.5031228 |
| 2 |
r12helse3_2 |
716 |
49.7% |
0.4968772 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5752 |
|
NA |
r12helse3_1
|
Variable label:
|
All norwegian citizens have equal access to government health services.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Under Norwegian law, the goal of the public health service is for
everyone to have “equal access to good quality services”. To what extent
do you agree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All Norwegian citizens do in fact have equal access to health services
from the government
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12helse3_ran = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
119 |
16.4% |
0.164137931 |
| 2 |
Agree |
297 |
41.0% |
0.409655172 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
137 |
18.9% |
0.188965517 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
26 |
3.6% |
0.035862069 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
93 |
12.8% |
0.128275862 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
38 |
5.2% |
0.052413793 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
11 |
1.5% |
0.015172414 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.6% |
0.005517241 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6468 |
|
NA |
r12helse3_2
|
Variable label:
|
All norwegian citizens have same opportunity to get health care
safeguarded by public health service
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Under Norwegian law, the goal of the public health service is for
everyone to have “equal access to good quality services”. To what extent
do you agree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All Norwegian citizens have the same opportunity to have their health
care needs safeguarded by the public health service
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12helse3_ran = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
135 |
18.9% |
0.188547486 |
| 2 |
Agree |
301 |
42.0% |
0.420391061 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
143 |
20.0% |
0.199720670 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
20 |
2.8% |
0.027932961 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
68 |
9.5% |
0.094972067 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
27 |
3.8% |
0.037709497 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
19 |
2.7% |
0.026536313 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004189944 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6477 |
|
NA |
r12helse3_3
|
Variable label:
|
The government offers good-quality health services.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Under Norwegian law, the goal of the public health service is for
everyone to have “equal access to good quality services”. To what extent
do you agree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government offers good-quality health services
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom r12group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
227 |
15.8% |
0.157529493 |
| 2 |
Agree |
767 |
53.2% |
0.532269257 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
278 |
19.3% |
0.192921582 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
54 |
3.7% |
0.037473976 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
74 |
5.1% |
0.051353227 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
23 |
1.6% |
0.015961138 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005551700 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.006939625 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
r12helse4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Problems paying for health or dental care: Consultation/treatment GP.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you had problems paying for health or dental care during the past
year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, consultation/treatment at GP
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, consultation/treatment at GP |
46 |
3.2% |
0.03192228 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1395 |
96.8% |
0.96807772 |
r12helse4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Problems paying for health or dental care: Consultation/treatment
dentist.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you had problems paying for health or dental care during the past
year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, consultation/treatment at dentist
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, consultation/treatment at dentist |
137 |
9.5% |
0.09507287 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1304 |
90.5% |
0.90492713 |
r12helse4_3
|
Variable label:
|
Problems paying for health or dental care: Medicines
recommended/prescribed by healthcare professional.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you had problems paying for health or dental care during the past
year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, medicines recommended or prescribed by healthcare professional you
have been in contact with
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, medicines recommended or prescribed by healthcare professional you have
been in contact with |
36 |
2.5% |
0.02498265 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1405 |
97.5% |
0.97501735 |
r12helse4_4
|
Variable label:
|
Problems paying for health or dental care: Referred physiotherapist,
choripractor, psychologist, psychiatrist.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you had problems paying for health or dental care during the past
year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, treatment (physiotherapist/physiotherapy, chiropractor,
psychologist, psychiatrist, etc.) you have been referred to
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, treatment (physiotherapist/physiotherapy, chiropractor, psychologist,
psychiatrist, etc.) you have been referred to |
48 |
3.3% |
0.0333102 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1393 |
96.7% |
0.9666898 |
r12helse4_5
|
Variable label:
|
Problems paying for health or dental care: Non-referred physiotherapist,
choripractor, psychologist, psychiatrist.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you had problems paying for health or dental care during the past
year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, treatment (at physiotherapist/physiotherapy, chiropractor,
psychologist, psychiatrist, etc.) you have not been referred to
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, treatment (at physiotherapist/physiotherapy, chiropractor, psychologist,
psychiatrist, etc.) you have not been referred to |
34 |
2.4% |
0.02359473 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1407 |
97.6% |
0.97640527 |
r12helse4_6
|
Variable label:
|
Problems paying for health or dental care: Non-prescription medication
as desired without contact with healthcare professionals.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you had problems paying for health or dental care during the past
year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, non-prescription medications as desired, without having been in
contact with healthcare professionals
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, non-prescription medications as desired, without having been in contact
with healthcare professionals |
14 |
1.0% |
0.009715475 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1427 |
99.0% |
0.990284525 |
r12helse4_7
|
Variable label:
|
Problems paying for health or dental care: Acupuncture, homeopathy,
osteopathy or other alternative therapies.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you had problems paying for health or dental care during the past
year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, acupuncture, homeopathy, osteopathy or other forms of alternative
therapies
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, acupuncture, homeopathy, osteopathy or other forms of alternative therapies |
15 |
1.0% |
0.01040944 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1426 |
99.0% |
0.98959056 |
r12helse4_8
|
Variable label:
|
Problems paying for health or dental care: Other.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you had problems paying for health or dental care during the past
year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, other (fill out)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, other (fill out) |
17 |
1.2% |
0.01179736 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1424 |
98.8% |
0.98820264 |
r12helse4_8_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other[r12helse4_8] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you had problems paying for health or dental care during the past
year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, other (fill out)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12helse4_9
|
Variable label:
|
Problems paying for health or dental care: No.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you had problems paying for health or dental care during the past
year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
1238 |
85.9% |
0.8591256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
203 |
14.1% |
0.1408744 |
r12kreft1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Heard about what types of cancer. [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What types of cancer have you heard of?
If you would like more information about cancer, go to: https://kreftforeningen.no/om-kreft/
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down all the ones you can think of.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12kreft2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Information about cancer from: Newspapers and magazines.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Newspapers and magazines
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Newspapers and magazines |
592 |
41.1% |
0.4108258 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
849 |
58.9% |
0.5891742 |
r12kreft2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Information about cancer from: Books and movies.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Books and movies
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Books and movies |
69 |
4.8% |
0.04788341 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1372 |
95.2% |
0.95211659 |
r12kreft2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Information about cancer from: Friends, family or aquaintances who have
had cancer.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends, family or acquaintances who have had cancer
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Friends, family or acquaintances who have had cancer |
720 |
50.0% |
0.499653 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
721 |
50.0% |
0.500347 |
r12kreft2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Information about cancer from: Health professionals.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health professionals
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health professionals |
312 |
21.7% |
0.2165163 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1129 |
78.3% |
0.7834837 |
r12kreft2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Information about cancer from: Information brochures.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Information brochures
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Information brochures |
206 |
14.3% |
0.1429563 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1235 |
85.7% |
0.8570437 |
r12kreft2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Information about cancer from: Work and education.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Work and education
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Work and education |
246 |
17.1% |
0.1707148 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1195 |
82.9% |
0.8292852 |
r12kreft2_7
|
Variable label:
|
Information about cancer from: TV and radio.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV and radio
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
TV and radio |
588 |
40.8% |
0.40805 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
853 |
59.2% |
0.59195 |
r12kreft2_8
|
Variable label:
|
Information about cancer from: Social media and blogs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social media and blogs
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Sosiale medier og blogg |
167 |
11.6% |
0.1158917 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1274 |
88.4% |
0.8841083 |
r12kreft2_9
|
Variable label:
|
Information about cancer from: Searching the internet.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Searching the internet
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Searching the internet |
419 |
29.1% |
0.2907703 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1022 |
70.9% |
0.7092297 |
r12kreft2_10
|
Variable label:
|
Information about cancer from: Friends, family or aquaintances.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends, family or acquaintances
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Friends, family or acquaintances |
448 |
31.1% |
0.3108952 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
993 |
68.9% |
0.6891048 |
r12kreft2_11
|
Variable label:
|
Information about cancer from: Other.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other (fill out)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other (fill out) |
40 |
2.8% |
0.0277585 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1401 |
97.2% |
0.9722415 |
r12kreft2_11_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other[r12kref2_11] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other (fill out)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12kreft2_12
|
Variable label:
|
Information about cancer from: No knowledge about cancer.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where do you get your information about cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I don’t know anything about cancer
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick your three main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I don’t know anything about cancer |
17 |
1.2% |
0.01179736 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1424 |
98.8% |
0.98820264 |
r12kreft2_click
|
Variable label:
|
[Registers if the respondent clicked the link to the Norwegian Cancer
Society (“Kreftforeningen”) website (only desktop users are registered,
not mobile users), if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you would like more information about cancer, go to: https://kreftforeningen.no/om-kreft/
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Registers if the respondent clicked the link to the Norwegian Cancer
Society (“Kreftforeningen”) website (only desktop users are registered,
not mobile users), if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8] [Invalid:7185] [Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Clicked the link |
8 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7185 |
|
NA |
r12polkom5_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r12group = 1. Randomly selects r12polkom[5/6/7]a, b or
c. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r12group = 1. Randomly selects r12polkom[5/6/7]a, b or
c. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1440] [Invalid:5753]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
R12POLKOM5A |
502 |
34.9% |
0.3486111 |
| 2 |
R12POLKOM5B |
474 |
32.9% |
0.3291667 |
| 3 |
R12POLKOM5C |
464 |
32.2% |
0.3222222 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5753 |
|
NA |
r12polkom5a
|
Variable label:
|
Immigration-positive post: How likely to find in media you normally use.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you can read the introduction to a hypothetical op-ed post in a
Norwegian online newspaper. Please read the post carefully and answer
the questions below. Scroll down the screen to see all three questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigration enriches our society
The recent influx of immigrants to Norway makes our democratic
society more unprejudiced and tolerant.
If we give immigrants the right opportunities and help them integrate
into Norwegian society, they will enrich our culture and our values.
How likely or unlikely would it be for you to come across such a post in
the media you normally use?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom5_ran = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
69 |
13.7% |
0.137450199 |
| 2 |
Likely |
184 |
36.7% |
0.366533865 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
139 |
27.7% |
0.276892430 |
| 4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
55 |
11.0% |
0.109561753 |
| 5 |
Unlikely |
33 |
6.6% |
0.065737052 |
| 6 |
Somewhat unlikely |
9 |
1.8% |
0.017928287 |
| 7 |
Highly unlikely |
8 |
1.6% |
0.015936255 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
1.0% |
0.009960159 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6691 |
|
NA |
r12polkom6a
|
Variable label:
|
Immigration-positive post: How likely to read.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you can read the introduction to a hypothetical op-ed post in a
Norwegian online newspaper. Please read the post carefully and answer
the questions below. Scroll down the screen to see all three questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely or unlikely would it be for you to read such a post if you
had come across it in the media you normally use?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom5_ran = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
91 |
18.1% |
0.181274900 |
| 2 |
Likely |
180 |
35.9% |
0.358565737 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
129 |
25.7% |
0.256972112 |
| 4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
46 |
9.2% |
0.091633466 |
| 5 |
Unlikely |
30 |
6.0% |
0.059760956 |
| 6 |
Somewhat unlikely |
10 |
2.0% |
0.019920319 |
| 7 |
Highly unlikely |
13 |
2.6% |
0.025896414 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.6% |
0.005976096 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6691 |
|
NA |
r12polkom7a
|
Variable label:
|
Immigration-positive post: Thinks immigration to Norway is advantage or
disadvantage.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you can read the introduction to a hypothetical op-ed post in a
Norwegian online newspaper. Please read the post carefully and answer
the questions below. Scroll down the screen to see all three questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what degree would you say that the post claims that it is an
advantage or disadvantage that immigrants come to Norway to settle here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom5_ran = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very great advantage |
80 |
15.9% |
0.159362550 |
| 2 |
Great advantage |
194 |
38.6% |
0.386454183 |
| 3 |
Slightly advantageous |
140 |
27.9% |
0.278884462 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
50 |
10.0% |
0.099601594 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
22 |
4.4% |
0.043824701 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
7 |
1.4% |
0.013944223 |
| 7 |
Very great disadvantage |
5 |
1.0% |
0.009960159 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.8% |
0.007968127 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6691 |
|
NA |
r12polkom5b
|
Variable label:
|
Immigration-negative post: How likely to find in media you normally use.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you can read the introduction to a hypothetical op-ed post in a
Norwegian online newspaper. Please read the post carefully and answer
the questions below. Scroll down the screen to see all three questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigration threatens our values
The recent influx of immigrants to Norway threatens our culture and
values. Our national identity is threatened because foreigners are not
willing to integrate.
We should therefore be able to decide who gets to settle here based
on how closely aligned they are with our national culture.
How likely or unlikely would it be for you to come across such a post in
the media you normally use?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom5_ran = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
80 |
16.9% |
0.168776371 |
| 2 |
Likely |
108 |
22.8% |
0.227848101 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
111 |
23.4% |
0.234177215 |
| 4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
58 |
12.2% |
0.122362869 |
| 5 |
Unlikely |
54 |
11.4% |
0.113924051 |
| 6 |
Somewhat unlikely |
24 |
5.1% |
0.050632911 |
| 7 |
Highly unlikely |
35 |
7.4% |
0.073839662 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.8% |
0.008438819 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6719 |
|
NA |
r12polkom6b
|
Variable label:
|
Immigration-negative post: How likely to read.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you can read the introduction to a hypothetical op-ed post in a
Norwegian online newspaper. Please read the post carefully and answer
the questions below. Scroll down the screen to see all three questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely or unlikely would it be for you to read such a post if you
had come across it in the media you normally use?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom5_ran = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
59 |
12.4% |
0.124472574 |
| 2 |
Likely |
118 |
24.9% |
0.248945148 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
111 |
23.4% |
0.234177215 |
| 4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
56 |
11.8% |
0.118143460 |
| 5 |
Unlikely |
62 |
13.1% |
0.130801688 |
| 6 |
Somewhat unlikely |
32 |
6.8% |
0.067510549 |
| 7 |
Highly unlikely |
32 |
6.8% |
0.067510549 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.8% |
0.008438819 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6719 |
|
NA |
r12polkom7b
|
Variable label:
|
Immigration-negative post: Thinks immigration to Norway is advantage or
disadvantage.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you can read the introduction to a hypothetical op-ed post in a
Norwegian online newspaper. Please read the post carefully and answer
the questions below. Scroll down the screen to see all three questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what degree would you say that the post claims that it is an
advantage or disadvantage that immigrants come to Norway to settle here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom5_ran = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002109705 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
14 |
3.0% |
0.029535865 |
| 3 |
An advantage to some extent |
23 |
4.9% |
0.048523207 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
49 |
10.3% |
0.103375527 |
| 5 |
A disadvantage to some extent |
83 |
17.5% |
0.175105485 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
168 |
35.4% |
0.354430380 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
131 |
27.6% |
0.276371308 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
1.1% |
0.010548523 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6719 |
|
NA |
r12polkom5c
|
Variable label:
|
Immigration-neutral post: How likely to find in media you normally use.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you can read the introduction to a hypothetical op-ed post in a
Norwegian online newspaper. Please read the post carefully and answer
the questions below. Scroll down the screen to see all three questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Does immigration enrich or threaten our society?
The recent influx of immigrants to Norway can threaten our national
identity, our culture and our values.
However, with the right tools we can facilitate the integration of
immigrants into our society and avoid discriminating against people
based on where they come from.
How likely or unlikely would it be for you to come across such a post in
the media you normally use?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom5_ran = 3 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
105 |
22.6% |
0.22629310 |
| 2 |
Likely |
166 |
35.8% |
0.35775862 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
101 |
21.8% |
0.21767241 |
| 4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
45 |
9.7% |
0.09698276 |
| 5 |
Unlikely |
25 |
5.4% |
0.05387931 |
| 6 |
Somewhat unlikely |
6 |
1.3% |
0.01293103 |
| 7 |
Highly unlikely |
9 |
1.9% |
0.01939655 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01508621 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6729 |
|
NA |
r12polkom6c
|
Variable label:
|
Immigration-neutral post: How likely to read.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you can read the introduction to a hypothetical op-ed post in a
Norwegian online newspaper. Please read the post carefully and answer
the questions below. Scroll down the screen to see all three questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely or unlikely would it be for you to read such a post if you
had come across it in the media you normally use?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom5_ran = 3 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
57 |
12.3% |
0.12284483 |
| 2 |
Likely |
161 |
34.7% |
0.34698276 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
126 |
27.2% |
0.27155172 |
| 4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
54 |
11.6% |
0.11637931 |
| 5 |
Unlikely |
33 |
7.1% |
0.07112069 |
| 6 |
Somewhat unlikely |
16 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
| 7 |
Highly unlikely |
10 |
2.2% |
0.02155172 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01508621 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6729 |
|
NA |
r12polkom7c
|
Variable label:
|
Immigration-neutral post: Thinks immigration to Norway is advantage or
disadvantage.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you can read the introduction to a hypothetical op-ed post in a
Norwegian online newspaper. Please read the post carefully and answer
the questions below. Scroll down the screen to see all three questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what degree would you say that the post claims that it is an
advantage or disadvantage that immigrants come to Norway to settle here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom5_ran = 3 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
9 |
1.9% |
0.01939655 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
31 |
6.7% |
0.06681034 |
| 3 |
An advantage to some extent |
105 |
22.6% |
0.22629310 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
104 |
22.4% |
0.22413793 |
| 5 |
A disadvantage to some extent |
136 |
29.3% |
0.29310345 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
54 |
11.6% |
0.11637931 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
15 |
3.2% |
0.03232759 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
2.2% |
0.02155172 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6729 |
|
NA |
r12polkom8
|
Variable label:
|
How likely to vote in advisory referendum on restricting immigration to
Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an advisory referendum on restricting immigration to Norway
will be held next Monday.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would vote in such a referendum?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
642 |
44.6% |
0.44552394 |
| 2 |
Likely |
340 |
23.6% |
0.23594726 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
158 |
11.0% |
0.10964608 |
| 4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
115 |
8.0% |
0.07980569 |
| 5 |
Unlikely |
68 |
4.7% |
0.04718945 |
| 6 |
Somewhat unlikely |
23 |
1.6% |
0.01596114 |
| 7 |
Highly unlikely |
76 |
5.3% |
0.05274115 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.3% |
0.01318529 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
r12polkom9
|
Variable label:
|
How would you vote in referendum on restricting immigration to Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you vote if an advisory referendum on restricting immigration
to Norway is held next Monday?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, restrict immigration to Norway |
746 |
51.8% |
0.5176960 |
| 2 |
No, I don’t support the proposal |
623 |
43.2% |
0.4323387 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
5.0% |
0.0499653 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
r12polkom10
|
Variable label:
|
How likely to vote in parliamentary election.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If there was a parliamentary election next Monday, how likely is it that
you would vote?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
1119 |
77.7% |
0.776544067 |
| 2 |
Likely |
184 |
12.8% |
0.127689105 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
37 |
2.6% |
0.025676613 |
| 4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
23 |
1.6% |
0.015961138 |
| 5 |
Unlikely |
16 |
1.1% |
0.011103400 |
| 6 |
Somewhat unlikely |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004163775 |
| 7 |
Highly unlikely |
33 |
2.3% |
0.022900763 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.6% |
0.015961138 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
r12pad16_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r12group = 1. Randomly selects r12pad16a or r12pad16b ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r12group = 1. Randomly selects r12pad16a or r12pad16b ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1428] [Invalid:5765]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gets R12PAD16A |
716 |
50.1% |
0.5014006 |
| 2 |
Gets R12PAD16B |
712 |
49.9% |
0.4985994 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5765 |
|
NA |
r12pad16a
|
Variable label:
|
Change voting system, easier, harder, or as difficult as today.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Norwegian electoral system encompasses fundamental rules about
both the allocation of the seats in the Storting among the political
parties and the counties. These rules are laid down in the Constitution,
which is difficult to amend.
Constitutional amendments must be submitted to the Storting over the
course of the first three periods after an election before they can be
adopted following a new parliamentary election and then with a 2/3
majority.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be easier, more difficult, or should it be just
as difficult as today to change the parliamentary voting system?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12pad16_ran = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Easier |
144 |
20.1% |
0.20111732 |
| 2 |
Same as today |
543 |
75.8% |
0.75837989 |
| 3 |
More difficult |
20 |
2.8% |
0.02793296 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.3% |
0.01256983 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6477 |
|
NA |
r12pad17_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r12group = 1. Randomly selects r12pad17a or r12pad17b]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r12group = 1. Randomly selects r12pad17a or r12pad17b]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1428] [Invalid:5765]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gets R12PAD17A |
690 |
48.3% |
0.4831933 |
| 2 |
Gets R12PAD17B |
738 |
51.7% |
0.5168067 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5765 |
|
NA |
r12pad17a
|
Variable label:
|
Change voting system according to population: Strong cities, weak
districts.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the Norwegian electoral system, the rural areas are safeguarded
through higher representation in the Storting compared with the populous
areas of the country. The electoral system currently allocates the
Storting representatives by county based on the population of the county
and the county’s geographical size.
Norway is now debating whether to allocate the number of Storting
representatives that will be elected from the different counties solely
according to population. Such a change could lead to the more populous
parts of the country becoming more strongly represented in the Storting
while the rural areas will receive less representation compared with
today’s electoral system.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly for or against are you to such a proposal to allocate the
number of Storting representatives that will be elected from the
different counties solely according to population?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12pad17_ran = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strongly for |
26 |
3.8% |
0.03768116 |
| 2 |
Strongly for |
55 |
8.0% |
0.07971014 |
| 3 |
Somewhat for |
105 |
15.2% |
0.15217391 |
| 4 |
Neither for nor against |
95 |
13.8% |
0.13768116 |
| 5 |
Somewhat against |
146 |
21.2% |
0.21159420 |
| 6 |
Strongly against |
145 |
21.0% |
0.21014493 |
| 7 |
Very strongly against |
109 |
15.8% |
0.15797101 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.3% |
0.01304348 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6503 |
|
NA |
r12pad17b
|
Variable label:
|
Change voting system according to population.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the Norwegian electoral system, the rural areas are safeguarded
through higher representation in the Storting compared with the populous
areas of the country. The electoral system currently allocates the
Storting representatives by county based on the population of the county
and the county’s geographical size.
Norway is now debating whether to allocate the number of Storting
representatives that will be elected from the different counties solely
according to population.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly for or against are you to such a proposal to allocate the
number of Storting representatives that will be elected from the
different counties solely according to population?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12pad17_ran = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strongly for |
31 |
4.2% |
0.04200542 |
| 2 |
Strongly for |
64 |
8.7% |
0.08672087 |
| 3 |
Somewhat for |
124 |
16.8% |
0.16802168 |
| 4 |
Neither for nor against |
162 |
22.0% |
0.21951220 |
| 5 |
Somewhat against |
131 |
17.8% |
0.17750678 |
| 6 |
Strongly against |
126 |
17.1% |
0.17073171 |
| 7 |
Very strongly against |
91 |
12.3% |
0.12330623 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.2% |
0.01219512 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6455 |
|
NA |
r12pad18_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r12group = 1. Randomly selects r12pad18a, b, c or d]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r12group = 1. Randomly selects r12pad18a, b, c or d]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1423] [Invalid:5770]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gets R12PAD18A |
491 |
34.5% |
0.3450457 |
| 2 |
Gets R12PAD18B |
480 |
33.7% |
0.3373155 |
| 3 |
Gets R12PAD18C |
452 |
31.8% |
0.3176388 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5770 |
|
NA |
r12pad18a
|
Variable label:
|
Change voting system proportionality: Smaller parties stronger.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
A basic principle in the Norwegian electoral system is that the
voters’ votes must count equally regardless of which party the voters
voted for in the election.
Some believe that Norway should change its parliamentary voting system
to achieve, compared with the current system, greater correspondence
between a party’s share of Storting representatives and the number of
votes cast for the party in elections. This could mean that the smaller
parties will become more strongly represented in the Storting compared
with today.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly for or opposed are you to such a proposal to change the
parliamentary voting system?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12pad18_ran = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strongly support |
17 |
3.5% |
0.03462322 |
| 2 |
Support |
53 |
10.8% |
0.10794297 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
94 |
19.1% |
0.19144603 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
132 |
26.9% |
0.26883910 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
93 |
18.9% |
0.18940937 |
| 6 |
Strongly oppose |
64 |
13.0% |
0.13034623 |
| 7 |
Very strongly oppose |
33 |
6.7% |
0.06720978 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
1.0% |
0.01018330 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6702 |
|
NA |
r12pad18b
|
Variable label:
|
Change voting system proportionality: Establishing governments capable
of governing harder.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
A basic principle in the Norwegian electoral system is that the
voters’ votes must count equally regardless of which party the voters
voted for in the election.
Some believe that Norway should change its parliamentary voting system
to achieve, compared with the current system, greater correspondence
between a party’s share of Storting representatives and the number of
votes cast for the party in elections. This could mean that the major
parties will receive fewer representatives in the Storting compared with
today, and make it more difficult to establish governments capable of
governing.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly for or opposed are you to such a proposal to change the
parliamentary voting system?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12pad18_ran = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strongly support |
14 |
2.9% |
0.02916667 |
| 2 |
Support |
42 |
8.8% |
0.08750000 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
62 |
12.9% |
0.12916667 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
125 |
26.0% |
0.26041667 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
120 |
25.0% |
0.25000000 |
| 6 |
Strongly oppose |
79 |
16.5% |
0.16458333 |
| 7 |
Very strongly oppose |
31 |
6.5% |
0.06458333 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01458333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6713 |
|
NA |
r12pad18c
|
Variable label:
|
Change voting system proportionality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
A basic principle in the Norwegian electoral system is that the
voters’ votes must count equally regardless of which party the voters
voted for in the election.
Some believe that Norway should change its parliamentary voting system
to achieve, compared with the current system, greater correspondence
between a party’s share of Storting representatives and the number of
votes cast for the party in elections.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly for or opposed are you to such a proposal to change the
parliamentary voting system?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12pad18_ran = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strongly support |
34 |
7.5% |
0.07522124 |
| 2 |
Support |
81 |
17.9% |
0.17920354 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
87 |
19.2% |
0.19247788 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
113 |
25.0% |
0.25000000 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
57 |
12.6% |
0.12610619 |
| 6 |
Strongly oppose |
48 |
10.6% |
0.10619469 |
| 7 |
Very strongly oppose |
20 |
4.4% |
0.04424779 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
2.7% |
0.02654867 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6741 |
|
NA |
r12pad16b
|
Variable label:
|
Change voting system, easier, harder or as difficult as today.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Norwegian electoral system encompasses fundamental rules about
both the allocation of the seats in the Storting among the political
parties and the counties. These rules are laid down in the Constitution,
which is difficult to amend.
Constitutional amendments must be submitted to the Storting over the
course of the first three periods after an election before they can be
adopted following a new parliamentary election and then with a 2/3
majority.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be easier, more difficult, or should it be just
as difficult as today to change the parliamentary voting system?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12pad18_ran = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Easier |
91 |
12.8% |
0.12780899 |
| 2 |
Same as today |
576 |
80.9% |
0.80898876 |
| 3 |
More difficult |
29 |
4.1% |
0.04073034 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
2.2% |
0.02247191 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6481 |
|
NA |
r12pad19_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r12group = 1. Randomly selects r12pad19a, b, c or d]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r12group = 1. Randomly selects r12pad19a, b, c or d]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1422] [Invalid:5771]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gets R12PAD19A |
343 |
24.1% |
0.2412096 |
| 2 |
Gets R12PAD19B |
369 |
25.9% |
0.2594937 |
| 3 |
Gets R12PAD19C |
342 |
24.1% |
0.2405063 |
| 4 |
Gets R12PAD19D |
368 |
25.9% |
0.2587904 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5771 |
|
NA |
r12pad19a
|
Variable label:
|
Introduce preferential voting: Strengthen voters’ influence.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway is now debating whether to give voters greater influence over
which candidates on the parties’ electoral lists are elected to the
Storting. This would mean the introduction of preferential voting in
parliamentary elections. Such a change will strengthen the voters’
influence over who is elected to the Storting.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly for or against are you to such a proposal for preferential
voting?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12pad19_ran = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strongly for |
27 |
7.9% |
0.07871720 |
| 2 |
Strongly for |
62 |
18.1% |
0.18075802 |
| 3 |
Somewhat for |
134 |
39.1% |
0.39067055 |
| 4 |
Neither for nor against |
49 |
14.3% |
0.14285714 |
| 5 |
Somewhat against |
36 |
10.5% |
0.10495627 |
| 6 |
Strongly against |
17 |
5.0% |
0.04956268 |
| 7 |
Very strongly against |
10 |
2.9% |
0.02915452 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
2.3% |
0.02332362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6850 |
|
NA |
r12pad19b
|
Variable label:
|
Introduce preferential voting: Weaken parties’ influence.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway is now debating whether to give voters greater influence over
which candidates on the parties’ electoral lists are elected to the
Storting. This would mean the introduction of preferential voting in
parliamentary elections. Such a change will weaken the parties’
influence over who is elected to the Storting.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly for or against are you to such a proposal for preferential
voting?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12pad19_ran = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strongly for |
20 |
5.4% |
0.05420054 |
| 2 |
Strongly for |
43 |
11.7% |
0.11653117 |
| 3 |
Somewhat for |
102 |
27.6% |
0.27642276 |
| 4 |
Neither for nor against |
86 |
23.3% |
0.23306233 |
| 5 |
Somewhat against |
69 |
18.7% |
0.18699187 |
| 6 |
Strongly against |
37 |
10.0% |
0.10027100 |
| 7 |
Very strongly against |
8 |
2.2% |
0.02168022 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
1.1% |
0.01084011 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6824 |
|
NA |
r12pad19c
|
Variable label:
|
Introduce preferential voting: List changes do not happen now.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway is now debating whether to give voters greater influence over
which candidates on the parties’ electoral lists are elected to the
Storting. This would mean the introduction of preferential voting in
parliamentary elections. Today, voters can change the ballot for
parliamentary elections, but over half of a party’s voters must make the
same change in order to override the parties’ electoral lists, which has
never happened.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly for or against are you to such a proposal for preferential
voting?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12pad19_ran = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strongly for |
22 |
6.4% |
0.064327485 |
| 2 |
Strongly for |
38 |
11.1% |
0.111111111 |
| 3 |
Somewhat for |
111 |
32.5% |
0.324561404 |
| 4 |
Neither for nor against |
99 |
28.9% |
0.289473684 |
| 5 |
Somewhat against |
41 |
12.0% |
0.119883041 |
| 6 |
Strongly against |
23 |
6.7% |
0.067251462 |
| 7 |
Very strongly against |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005847953 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
1.8% |
0.017543860 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6851 |
|
NA |
r12pad19d
|
Variable label:
|
Introduce preferential voting.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway is now debating whether to give voters greater influence over
which candidates on the parties’ electoral lists are elected to the
Storting. This would mean the introduction of preferential voting in
parliamentary elections.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly for or against are you to such a proposal for preferential
voting?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12pad19_ran = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strongly for |
18 |
4.9% |
0.04891304 |
| 2 |
Strongly for |
46 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat for |
116 |
31.5% |
0.31521739 |
| 4 |
Neither for nor against |
92 |
25.0% |
0.25000000 |
| 5 |
Somewhat against |
57 |
15.5% |
0.15489130 |
| 6 |
Strongly against |
26 |
7.1% |
0.07065217 |
| 7 |
Very strongly against |
13 |
3.5% |
0.03532609 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6825 |
|
NA |
r12polkom3
|
Variable label:
|
Regularly read items posted in alternative media.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Websites like Resett, Document.no, Human Rights Service and Breitbart
have attracted considerable attention over the past year.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
106 |
7.4% |
0.07356003 |
| 2 |
No |
1308 |
90.8% |
0.90770298 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.9% |
0.01873699 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5752 |
|
NA |
r12polkom4a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Why read alternative media: Editorial news media doesn’t cover issues I
am interested in.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The editorial news media do not cover the issues I am interested in
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The editorial news media do not cover the issues I am interested in |
44 |
41.5% |
0.4150943 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7087 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
62 |
58.5% |
0.5849057 |
r12polkom4a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Why read alternative media: Worried about immigration.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am worried about the consequences of immigration and would like more
information about this
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am worried about the consequences of immigration and would like more
information about this |
50 |
47.2% |
0.4716981 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7087 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
56 |
52.8% |
0.5283019 |
r12polkom4a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Why read alternative media: Immigration is a threat to security and
Norwegian culture.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I think immigration is a threat to national security and Norwegian
culture and want more information about this
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think immigration is a threat to national security and Norwegian culture and
want more information about this |
39 |
36.8% |
0.3679245 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7087 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
67 |
63.2% |
0.6320755 |
r12polkom4a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Why read alternative media: Trust them more than editorial news media.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have more trust in websites such as Document.no, Resett, Human Rights
Service (HRS) and Breitbart than editorial news media
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I have more trust in websites such as Document.no, Resett, Human Rights Service
(HRS) and Breitbart than editorial news media |
34 |
32.1% |
0.3207547 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7087 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
72 |
67.9% |
0.6792453 |
r12polkom4a_5
|
Variable label:
|
Why read alternative media: Editorial news media do not represent my
views.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The editorial news media do not represent my views
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The editorial news media do not represent my views |
26 |
24.5% |
0.245283 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7087 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
80 |
75.5% |
0.754717 |
r12polkom4a_6
|
Variable label:
|
Why read alternative media: Editorial news media hides truth about
immigration.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The editorial news media try to hide the truth about the consequences of
immigration
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The editorial news media try to hide the truth about the consequences of
immigration |
49 |
46.2% |
0.4622642 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7087 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
57 |
53.8% |
0.5377358 |
r12polkom4a_7
|
Variable label:
|
Why read alternative media: Other.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other (please specify)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other (please specify) |
30 |
28.3% |
0.2830189 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7087 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
76 |
71.7% |
0.7169811 |
r12polkom4a_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [r12polkom4a_7]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other (please specify)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 1 ] [Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12polkom4b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Why not read alternative media: News needs satisfied through editorial
news media.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why don’t you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I satisfy my need for news through the editorial news media
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I satisfy my need for news through the editorial news media |
640 |
48.9% |
0.489296636 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000764526 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5885 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
667 |
51.0% |
0.509938838 |
r12polkom4b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Why not read alternative media: Generally disagree with the political
views presented.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why don’t you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I generally disagree with the political views presented on websites such
as Document.no, Resett, Human Rights Service (HRS) and Breitbart
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I generally disagree with the political views presented on websites such as
Document.no, Resett, Human Rights Service (HRS) and Breitbart |
279 |
21.3% |
0.213302752 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000764526 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5885 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1028 |
78.6% |
0.785932722 |
r12polkom4b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Why not read alternative media: Don’t trust what is written.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why don’t you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I don’t trust that what is written on websites such as Document.no,
Resett, Human Rights Service (HRS) and Breitbart is true
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I don’t trust that what is written on websites such as Document.no, Resett,
Human Rights Service (HRS) and Breitbart is true |
386 |
29.5% |
0.295107034 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000764526 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5885 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
921 |
70.4% |
0.704128440 |
r12polkom4b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Why not read alternative media: They are xenophobic in coverage of
immigrants.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why don’t you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Websites such as Document.no, Resett, Human Rights Service (HRS) and
Breitbart are xenophobic in their coverage of immigrants
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Websites such as Document.no, Resett, Human Rights Service (HRS) and Breitbart
are xenophobic in their coverage of immigrants |
230 |
17.6% |
0.175840979 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000764526 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5885 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1077 |
82.3% |
0.823394495 |
r12polkom4b_5
|
Variable label:
|
Why not read alternative media: They don’t comply with Code of Ethics of
the Norwegian Press.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why don’t you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Websites such as Document.no, Resett, Human Rights Service (HRS) and
Breitbart do not comply with the press ethics embodied in the Code of
Ethics of the Norwegian Press.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Websites such as Document.no, Resett, Human Rights Service (HRS) and Breitbart
do not comply with the press ethics embodied in the Code of Ethics of the
Norwegian Press |
207 |
15.8% |
0.158256881 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000764526 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5885 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1100 |
84.1% |
0.840978593 |
r12polkom4b_6
|
Variable label:
|
Why not read alternative media: Have not heard of them.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why don’t you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have not heard of Document.no, Resett, Human Rights Service (HRS) and
Breitbart
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I have not heard of Document.no, Resett, Human Rights Service (HRS) and
Breitbart |
446 |
34.1% |
0.340978593 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000764526 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5885 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
861 |
65.8% |
0.658256881 |
r12polkom4b_7
|
Variable label:
|
Why not read alternative media: Other.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why don’t you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other (please specify)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other (please specify) |
40 |
3.1% |
0.030581040 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000764526 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5885 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1267 |
96.9% |
0.968654434 |
r12polkom4b_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [r12polkom4b_7]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why don’t you regularly read items posted on such websites?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other (please specify)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 1 and r12polkom3 = 2 ] [Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r12pad0
|
Variable label:
|
How well are women represented in Norwegian politics.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your view, how well are women represented in Norwegian politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Underrepresented |
48 |
3.5% |
0.034632035 |
| 2 |
Somewhat underrepresented |
371 |
26.8% |
0.267676768 |
| 3 |
Well represented |
867 |
62.6% |
0.625541126 |
| 4 |
Somewhat overrepresented |
79 |
5.7% |
0.056998557 |
| 5 |
Overrepresented |
17 |
1.2% |
0.012265512 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002886003 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5807 |
|
NA |
r12pad1
|
Variable label:
|
The police reform will contribute to more visible and accessible police.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The police reform took effect on 1 January 2016. The aim of the
reform is to ensure the presence of competent and effective local law
enforcement where the population lives, while developing good
professional environments equipped to meet today’s and tomorrow’s crime
challenges. A consequence of the reform is the merger of units, so that
we currently have fewer police districts and sheriff’s offices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
proposition/statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The policy reform will contribute to more visible and accessible police.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
2.2% |
0.022366522 |
| 2 |
Agree |
106 |
7.6% |
0.076479076 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
141 |
10.2% |
0.101731602 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
299 |
21.6% |
0.215728716 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
318 |
22.9% |
0.229437229 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
349 |
25.2% |
0.251803752 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
136 |
9.8% |
0.098124098 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004329004 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5807 |
|
NA |
r12pad2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: All new passenger cars from 2025 should be elctric,
hydrogen-powered or similar.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
proposition/statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
All new passenger cars from 2025 should be electric, hydrogen-powered or
similar.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r12group = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7193] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
164 |
11.8% |
0.118326118 |
| 2 |
Agree |
234 |
16.9% |
0.168831169 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
275 |
19.8% |
0.198412698 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
124 |
8.9% |
0.089466089 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
189 |
13.6% |
0.136363636 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
230 |
16.6% |
0.165945166 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
166 |
12.0% |
0.119769120 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002886003 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5807 |
|
|
