Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
Coordinator, UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Sveinung Arnesen
|
NORCE
|
|
Susanne Bygnes
|
UiB
|
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
NORCE
|
|
Yvette Peters
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project Team Member
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality Assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in four
waves, wave 1, wave 3, wave 8 and wave 11. In wave 1, 4.870 panel
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4245
new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave 11,
2069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure
of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000
individuals. In wave 11, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people
was drawn.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
In wave 11, the list from the Norwegian Tax Administration consisted of
the following data: a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender,
e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current
home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment. Please refer to the Documentation Report from Wave 11. The
report is available here:
http://digsscore.uib.no/download-data-and-documentation
In wave 13, emails were sent out on October 17th, 2018.
E-mail with reminder was sent out three times, October 23rd, October
29th and November 2nd, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not
logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel
members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via
text message. Panel members without registered phone number were
reminded by e-mail.
Wave 13 ended November 5th.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights,
the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender
and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in
the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register.
Information regarding the level of education is provided by the
respondents when answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 13
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-01
|
r13Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r13Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-01
|
r13Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-03-15
|
r13pad5_sak
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 13
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
r13meme10c_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
r13meme10c_2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
r13meme10c_3
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r13polkom14a
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r13polkom15a
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-03-26
|
r13km1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-31
|
r13polkom2
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13pad10b_2_other
|
Added
data
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13pad10d_2_other
|
Added
data
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13km_kopris_open
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13polkom1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13kmmoral_open
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2018-12-06
|
r13pad10d
|
Updated norwegian value label.
|
|
NA
|
2018-12-06
|
r13pad10d_2_other
|
Updated norwegian value label.
|
|
v-100
|
2018-12-03
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 13
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 13 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
7209
|
|
# Variables
|
248
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentn completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave1 |
1808 |
25.1% |
0.2507976 |
| 3 |
Wave3 |
2000 |
27.7% |
0.2774310 |
| 8 |
Wave8 |
2061 |
28.6% |
0.2858926 |
| 11 |
Wave11 |
1340 |
18.6% |
0.1858788 |
r13browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
annet |
4546 |
63.1% |
0.6306006 |
| 1 |
mobil |
2663 |
36.9% |
0.3693994 |
r13opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
4659 |
64.6% |
0.646275489 |
| 2 |
Touch |
2535 |
35.2% |
0.351643779 |
| 3 |
Generisk |
15 |
0.2% |
0.002080732 |
r13advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13group
|
Variable label:
|
[Subgroup in wave 13. Randomized. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Subgroup in wave 12. Randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
g1 |
1454 |
20.2% |
0.2016923 |
| 2 |
g2 |
1482 |
20.6% |
0.2055764 |
| 3 |
g3 |
1496 |
20.8% |
0.2075184 |
| 4 |
g4 |
1407 |
19.5% |
0.1951727 |
| 5 |
g5 |
1370 |
19.0% |
0.1900402 |
r13pk6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Christian Democratic Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
848 |
11.8% |
0.117630739 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1184 |
16.4% |
0.164239146 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1740 |
24.1% |
0.241364960 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1496 |
20.8% |
0.207518380 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1372 |
19.0% |
0.190317658 |
| 6 |
Really like |
388 |
5.4% |
0.053821612 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
114 |
1.6% |
0.015813566 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.9% |
0.009293938 |
r13pk6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Conservative Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
258 |
3.6% |
0.035788598 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
925 |
12.8% |
0.128311832 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1309 |
18.2% |
0.181578582 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
877 |
12.2% |
0.121653489 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1719 |
23.8% |
0.238451935 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1596 |
22.1% |
0.221389929 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
469 |
6.5% |
0.065057567 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
0.8% |
0.007768068 |
r13pk6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Progress Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2136 |
29.6% |
0.296296296 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1440 |
20.0% |
0.199750312 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
967 |
13.4% |
0.134137883 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
592 |
8.2% |
0.082119573 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1122 |
15.6% |
0.155638785 |
| 6 |
Really like |
680 |
9.4% |
0.094326536 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
209 |
2.9% |
0.028991538 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
0.9% |
0.008739076 |
r13pk6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Liberal Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
466 |
6.5% |
0.06464142 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
939 |
13.0% |
0.13025385 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1588 |
22.0% |
0.22028021 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1910 |
26.5% |
0.26494659 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1702 |
23.6% |
0.23609377 |
| 6 |
Really like |
455 |
6.3% |
0.06311555 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
71 |
1.0% |
0.00984880 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
78 |
1.1% |
0.01081981 |
r13pk6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Socialist Left Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
898 |
12.5% |
0.12456651 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1193 |
16.5% |
0.16548758 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1238 |
17.2% |
0.17172978 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1230 |
17.1% |
0.17062006 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1414 |
19.6% |
0.19614371 |
| 6 |
Really like |
898 |
12.5% |
0.12456651 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
264 |
3.7% |
0.03662089 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
1.0% |
0.01026495 |
r13pk6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Centre Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
321 |
4.5% |
0.04452767 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
678 |
9.4% |
0.09404911 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1341 |
18.6% |
0.18601748 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2011 |
27.9% |
0.27895686 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1827 |
25.3% |
0.25343321 |
| 6 |
Really like |
762 |
10.6% |
0.10570121 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
184 |
2.6% |
0.02552365 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
85 |
1.2% |
0.01179082 |
r13pk6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Green Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1207 |
16.7% |
0.167429602 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1140 |
15.8% |
0.158135664 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1261 |
17.5% |
0.174920239 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1183 |
16.4% |
0.164100430 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1569 |
21.8% |
0.217644611 |
| 6 |
Really like |
617 |
8.6% |
0.085587460 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
160 |
2.2% |
0.022194479 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
1.0% |
0.009987516 |
r13pk6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Labour Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
294 |
4.1% |
0.040782355 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
666 |
9.2% |
0.092384519 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1221 |
16.9% |
0.169371619 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
998 |
13.8% |
0.138438064 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2173 |
30.1% |
0.301428770 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1481 |
20.5% |
0.205437647 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
310 |
4.3% |
0.043001803 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
66 |
0.9% |
0.009155223 |
r13pk6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Red Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1475 |
20.5% |
0.20460535 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1207 |
16.7% |
0.16742960 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1063 |
14.7% |
0.14745457 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1316 |
18.3% |
0.18254959 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1243 |
17.2% |
0.17242336 |
| 6 |
Really like |
582 |
8.1% |
0.08073242 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
236 |
3.3% |
0.03273686 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
1.2% |
0.01206825 |
r13meme1_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme1_1-3 ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme1_1-3 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1370] [Invalid:5839]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway |
685 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| 2 |
your local community |
685 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue: 1. [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are, in your opinion, the main political issues or areas for
[Norway/your local community]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13meme1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue: 2. [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are, in your opinion, the main political issues or areas for
[Norway/your local community]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13meme1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue: 3. [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are, in your opinion, the main political issues or areas for
[Norway/your local community]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13km1
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think when you hear or read “climate change” [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read “climate change”
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r8km1 is answered]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
eips2018c_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Collects values from eips2017c_ran]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Collects values from eips2017c_ran]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1760] [Invalid:5449]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[BLANK] |
355 |
20.2% |
0.2017045 |
| 2 |
for you personally |
357 |
20.3% |
0.2028409 |
| 3 |
for Norway |
358 |
20.3% |
0.2034091 |
| 4 |
for Europe |
338 |
19.2% |
0.1920455 |
| 5 |
for the world |
352 |
20.0% |
0.2000000 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5449 |
|
NA |
eips2018c
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you see climate change as a threat [BLANK/for you
personally/for Norway/for Europe/for the World].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you see climate change as a threat [BLANK / for you
personally / for Norway / for Europe / for the world]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if value on eips2017c_ran]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 No threat at all |
63 |
3.6% |
0.035795455 |
| 2 |
1 |
32 |
1.8% |
0.018181818 |
| 3 |
2 |
81 |
4.6% |
0.046022727 |
| 4 |
3 |
135 |
7.7% |
0.076704545 |
| 5 |
4 |
110 |
6.2% |
0.062500000 |
| 6 |
5 |
244 |
13.9% |
0.138636364 |
| 7 |
6 |
217 |
12.3% |
0.123295455 |
| 8 |
7 |
313 |
17.8% |
0.177840909 |
| 9 |
8 |
296 |
16.8% |
0.168181818 |
| 10 |
9 |
126 |
7.2% |
0.071590909 |
| 11 |
10 Extreme threat |
140 |
8.0% |
0.079545455 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001704545 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5449 |
|
NA |
r13km_moral_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13km_moral if r13group = 4 or 5]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13km_moral if r13group = 4 or 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2777] [Invalid:4432]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
B: The responsibility for emission cuts should be allocated as fairly as
possible between the countries, even though it may lead to significant costs for
Norway |
698 |
25.1% |
0.2513504 |
| 2 |
B: The countries that have up until now emitted the most greenhouse gases should
make the biggest cuts, even though it may lead to significant costs for Norway |
538 |
19.4% |
0.1937342 |
| 3 |
B: The wealthy countries should make the biggest cuts, even though it may lead
to significant costs for Norway |
492 |
17.7% |
0.1771696 |
| 4 |
B: All countries should reduce their emissions by the same percentage, even
though it may lead to significant costs for Norway |
555 |
20.0% |
0.1998560 |
| 5 |
B: All people should be entitled to emit the same amount of Co2 greenhouse
gases, with the size of a country's population determining the amount of
greenhouse gases the country can emit, even though it may lead to significant
costs for Norway |
494 |
17.8% |
0.1778898 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4432 |
|
NA |
r13km_moral
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with which position on allocation of emission cuts: Norwegian
economic interests vs [R13KM_MORAL_RAN].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following describes two opposing positions in the question of how
responsibility for emission cuts should be allocated between countries
in international climate agreements.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these positions do you most agree with?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4 or 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree very much more with A |
123 |
4.4% |
0.04429240 |
| 2 |
Agree much more with A |
165 |
5.9% |
0.05941664 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat more with A |
285 |
10.3% |
0.10262874 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat more with B |
624 |
22.5% |
0.22470292 |
| 5 |
Agree much more with B |
772 |
27.8% |
0.27799784 |
| 6 |
Agree very much more with B |
537 |
19.3% |
0.19337414 |
| 7 |
Agree with neither A nor B |
240 |
8.6% |
0.08642420 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.1% |
0.01116313 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4432 |
|
NA |
r13kmmoral_open
|
Variable label:
|
Elaboration on allocation of climate cuts between countries [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like to ask you to elaborate on your opinion on how the
responsibility for emission cuts should be allocated between countries.
|
|
Post-question:
|
We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or
just a few words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4 or 5]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13kmplast
|
Variable label:
|
Participated in campaigns to collect plastic from nature last 12 months.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This question applies to plastic in the ocean, and organised campaigns
designed to collect plastic from the countryside, e.g. on beaches, along
the coast, in rivers and in lakes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you taken part in any campaigns designed to collect plastic from
the countryside during the last 12 months?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please select the most suitable option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I have participated in one or more organised campaigns designed to collect
the plastic from the countryside |
87 |
6.0% |
0.059834938 |
| 2 |
I have collected plastic on my own (not as part of an organised campaign). |
517 |
35.6% |
0.355570839 |
| 3 |
I have wanted to collect plastic, but so far I have not done so. |
277 |
19.1% |
0.190508941 |
| 4 |
No. |
570 |
39.2% |
0.392022008 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002063274 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13kmplast_text
|
Variable label:
|
Comments to [R13KMPLAST] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments, please write them here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy
considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers
after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13km30
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree moral duty for individuals to contribute to prevent
climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what degree do you regard it as a moral duty for individuals to
contribute towards preventing climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
429 |
29.5% |
0.295048143 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
588 |
40.4% |
0.404401651 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
369 |
25.4% |
0.253782669 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
45 |
3.1% |
0.030949106 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
19 |
1.3% |
0.013067400 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002751032 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km64
|
Variable label:
|
How postitive or negative will climate change be for Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change will affect each country in different ways.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative do you think climate change will be for Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Only positive |
16 |
1.1% |
0.011004127 |
| 2 |
More positive than negative |
151 |
10.4% |
0.103851444 |
| 3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
284 |
19.5% |
0.195323246 |
| 4 |
More negative than positive |
872 |
60.0% |
0.599724897 |
| 5 |
Only negative |
119 |
8.2% |
0.081843191 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.8% |
0.008253095 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Hope.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hope
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
to “very strong”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
80 |
5.5% |
0.05502063 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
302 |
20.8% |
0.20770289 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
760 |
52.3% |
0.52269601 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
243 |
16.7% |
0.16712517 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
35 |
2.4% |
0.02407153 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2.3% |
0.02338377 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Sadness.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sadness
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
to “very strong”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
107 |
7.4% |
0.07359010 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
270 |
18.6% |
0.18569464 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
593 |
40.8% |
0.40784044 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
347 |
23.9% |
0.23865199 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
99 |
6.8% |
0.06808803 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.6% |
0.02613480 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Fear.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
to “very strong”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
152 |
10.5% |
0.10453920 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
375 |
25.8% |
0.25790922 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
613 |
42.2% |
0.42159560 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
223 |
15.3% |
0.15337001 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
55 |
3.8% |
0.03782669 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
2.5% |
0.02475928 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_4
|
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Anger.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
to “very strong”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
207 |
14.2% |
0.14236589 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
398 |
27.4% |
0.27372765 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
537 |
36.9% |
0.36932600 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
212 |
14.6% |
0.14580468 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
62 |
4.3% |
0.04264099 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.6% |
0.02613480 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_5
|
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Guilt.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Guilt
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
to “very strong”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
214 |
14.7% |
0.14718019 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
497 |
34.2% |
0.34181568 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
583 |
40.1% |
0.40096286 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
111 |
7.6% |
0.07634113 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
18 |
1.2% |
0.01237964 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.1% |
0.02132050 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_6
|
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Tired of it.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tired of it
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
to “very strong”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
458 |
31.5% |
0.31499312 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
383 |
26.3% |
0.26341128 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
426 |
29.3% |
0.29298487 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
89 |
6.1% |
0.06121045 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
58 |
4.0% |
0.03988996 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.8% |
0.02751032 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13kmkopris_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmkopris if
r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmkopris if
r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1448] [Invalid:5761]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very negative - Very positive |
708 |
48.9% |
0.4889503 |
| 2 |
Very positive - Very negative |
740 |
51.1% |
0.5110497 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5761 |
|
NA |
r13kmkopris
|
Variable label:
|
Positive or negative about rush hour increases in toll ring cost.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Several Norwegian cities have introduced a toll scheme which would cost
more to cross the toll ring during rush hour and cost less outside of
rush hour.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel positive or negative about such a scheme?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
137 |
9.4% |
0.094222834 |
| 2 |
Positive |
268 |
18.4% |
0.184319120 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
238 |
16.4% |
0.163686382 |
| 4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
147 |
10.1% |
0.101100413 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
203 |
14.0% |
0.139614856 |
| 6 |
Negative |
185 |
12.7% |
0.127235213 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
266 |
18.3% |
0.182943604 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.006877579 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km_kopris_open
|
Variable label:
|
Comment on [R13KMKOPRIS] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
You can write a comment here if you want:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13km_klima_tiltak
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Unsure about what I can do to reduce climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I’m unsure what I can do in my daily life to reduce climate change.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
28 |
1.9% |
0.019257221 |
| 2 |
Agree |
124 |
8.5% |
0.085281981 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
266 |
18.3% |
0.182943604 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
228 |
15.7% |
0.156808803 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
332 |
22.8% |
0.228335626 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
376 |
25.9% |
0.258596974 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
91 |
6.3% |
0.062585970 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.6% |
0.006189821 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km_politisk_tiltak
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I am unsure about what policy measure are good for
reducing climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am unsure what policy measures are good for reducing climate change.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
59 |
4.1% |
0.040577717 |
| 2 |
Agree |
205 |
14.1% |
0.140990371 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
384 |
26.4% |
0.264099037 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
214 |
14.7% |
0.147180193 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
259 |
17.8% |
0.178129298 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
250 |
17.2% |
0.171939477 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
69 |
4.7% |
0.047455296 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.0% |
0.009628611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km_politisk_tiltak_open
|
Variable label:
|
Comment on [R13KM_POLITISK_TILTAK] [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have additional comments regarding policy measures, please write
them here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy
considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers
after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13polkom10
|
Variable label:
|
How confident that fact-checking services present facts.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In Norway, we have various fact-checking services (such as Faktisk.no)
that fact-check Norwegian public debate. The aim of such fact-checking
services is to contribute to a fact-based public debate and prevent the
spread of fictitious messages and news.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have that such services
present the facts?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
67 |
4.8% |
0.04761905 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
485 |
34.5% |
0.34470505 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
637 |
45.3% |
0.45273632 |
| 4 |
Little confidence |
154 |
10.9% |
0.10945274 |
| 5 |
No confidence at all |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02274343 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02274343 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5802 |
|
NA |
r13polkom11_parti
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects political party for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects political party for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1388] [Invalid:5821]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
133 |
9.6% |
0.09582133 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
154 |
11.1% |
0.11095101 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party |
155 |
11.2% |
0.11167147 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
150 |
10.8% |
0.10806916 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
170 |
12.2% |
0.12247839 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party |
137 |
9.9% |
0.09870317 |
| 7 |
The Christian Democrats |
170 |
12.2% |
0.12247839 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party |
155 |
11.2% |
0.11167147 |
| 9 |
The Progress Party |
164 |
11.8% |
0.11815562 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5821 |
|
NA |
r13polkom11_konklusjon
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects conclusion for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects conclusion for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1388] [Invalid:5821]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
completely true. |
314 |
22.6% |
0.2262248 |
| 2 |
completely wrong. |
362 |
26.1% |
0.2608069 |
| 3 |
completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party agree with the
conclusion of the fact-checking service. |
346 |
24.9% |
0.2492795 |
| 4 |
completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party disagree with
the conclusion of the fact-checking service. |
366 |
26.4% |
0.2636888 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5821 |
|
NA |
r13polkom11
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in fact-checking service given that statement from [party]
was deemed [wrong/true.]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you read a fact-check from a Norwegian fact-checking
service that concludes that a statement by a politician from [The Red
Party/The Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The
Green Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative
Party/The Progress Party] is [completely true/completely
wrong/completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party
agree with the conclusion of the fact-checking service/completely wrong.
Afterwards, key politicians from the same party disagree with the
conclusion of the fact-checking service].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on the above information, how much confidence would you have had
in the conclusion of the fact-checking service on this matter?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
83 |
5.9% |
0.05899076 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
464 |
33.0% |
0.32977967 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
574 |
40.8% |
0.40796020 |
| 4 |
Little confidence |
194 |
13.8% |
0.13788202 |
| 5 |
No confidence at all |
42 |
3.0% |
0.02985075 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
3.6% |
0.03553660 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5802 |
|
NA |
r13kmkt_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar,
r13kmktresearch and r13kmktuse]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar,
r13kmktresearch and r13kmktuse]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1495] [Invalid:5714]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
727 |
48.6% |
0.4862876 |
| 2 |
2 |
768 |
51.4% |
0.5137124 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5714 |
|
NA |
r13kmktfamiliar_scale
|
Variable label:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar, based on
r13kmkt_ran]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar, based on
r13kmkt_ran]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1495] [Invalid:5714]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No knowledge -> Good knowledge |
727 |
48.6% |
0.4862876 |
| 2 |
Good knowledge -> No knowledge |
768 |
51.4% |
0.5137124 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5714 |
|
NA |
r13kmktfamiliar
|
Variable label:
|
How much knowledge about climate manipulation (solar geoengineering).
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) traps heat in the atmosphere.
When there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the climate can
change, which will lead to it becoming warmer, with more droughts and
heat waves, a rise in sea levels and storms becoming more powerful.
One method for reducing the extent of climate change may possibly be
so-called “climate manipulation” (solar geoengineering), for example by
shading the sun.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much knowledge would you say that you have about this method?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Good knowledge |
18 |
1.2% |
0.012032086 |
| 2 |
Some knowledge |
168 |
11.2% |
0.112299465 |
| 3 |
Little knowledge |
489 |
32.7% |
0.326871658 |
| 4 |
No knowledge |
811 |
54.2% |
0.542112299 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.006684492 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5713 |
|
NA |
r13kmktresearch_scale
|
Variable label:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktresearch, based on
r13kmkt_ran]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktresearch, based on
r13kmkt_ran]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1487] [Invalid:5722]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly against such research ->Strongly in favour of such research |
725 |
48.8% |
0.4875588 |
| 2 |
Strongly in favour of such research ->Strongly against such research |
762 |
51.2% |
0.5124412 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5722 |
|
NA |
r13kmktresearch
|
Variable label:
|
Should be research program for climate manipulation with particles in
the atmosphere.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some experts have proposed a new approach to limiting climate change by
shading the sun. This method will involve spreading particles such as
sulphur aerosols in the atmosphere to reflect some of the sunlight back
into space. By reducing the amount of sunlight coming to earth, it is
expected that this method can cool down the planet and reduce several
other climate changes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think there should be an international research program to
explore the benefits and risks associated with shading the sun using
particles in the atmosphere?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please choose the option that comes closest to your view of such
research:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly in favour of such research |
322 |
21.5% |
0.21524064 |
| 2 |
Somewhat in favour of such research |
690 |
46.1% |
0.46122995 |
| 3 |
Somewhat against such research |
272 |
18.2% |
0.18181818 |
| 4 |
Strongly against such research |
183 |
12.2% |
0.12232620 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.9% |
0.01938503 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5713 |
|
NA |
r13kmktuse_scale
|
Variable label:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktuse, based on
r13kmkt_ran]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktuse, based on
r13kmkt_ran]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1484] [Invalid:5725]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree -> Strongly agree |
724 |
48.8% |
0.4878706 |
| 2 |
Strongly agree-> Strongly disagree |
760 |
51.2% |
0.5121294 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5725 |
|
NA |
r13kmktuse
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Climate manipulation with particles in the atmosphere
should be used to limit global warming.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
“Shading the sun by using particles in the atmosphere should be used to
limit global warming”
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
36 |
2.4% |
0.02406417 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
526 |
35.2% |
0.35160428 |
| 3 |
Disagree somewhat |
537 |
35.9% |
0.35895722 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
326 |
21.8% |
0.21791444 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
4.7% |
0.04745989 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5713 |
|
NA |
r13kmktresearchsecond_1
|
Variable label:
|
What percentage of Norwegian population would support research into
climate manipulation with particles in the atmosphere.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What proportion of the Norwegian population do you think will support an
international research programme of the type we have just mentioned?
(I.e. an international research program to explore the benefits and
risks associated with shading the sun using particles in the
atmosphere?)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please enter a number from 0 (none) to 100 (all).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1398] [Invalid:5811]
[Range:0-100]
|
r13kmktusesecond_1
|
Variable label:
|
What proportion of Norwegian population would support using climate
manipulation with particles in the atmosphere.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What proportion of the Norwegian population do you believe will agree
with this assertion:
“Shading the sun by using particles in the atmosphere should be used to
limit global warming”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please enter a number from 0 (none) to 100 (all).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1378] [Invalid:5831]
[Range:0-100]
|
r13kmktresearchopen
|
Variable label:
|
Justification of response : [R13KMTRESEARCH][Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You replied that you were [r13kmktresearch ] an international research
program to explore the benefits and risks associated with shading the
sun using particles in the atmosphere.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you write some words or sentences in the box below to justify your
response?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3 and if response on r13kmktresearch][Text data
will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can
be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen
Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13polkom2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects r13polkom2 or r13polkom5. Randomizes if 13group = 3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects r13polkom2 or r13polkom5. Randomizes if 13group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1470] [Invalid:5739]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent does not get R13POLKOM2 |
774 |
52.7% |
0.5265306 |
| 2 |
Respondent gets R13POLKOM2 |
696 |
47.3% |
0.4734694 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5739 |
|
NA |
r13polkom2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Difference between real and fake news. [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Fake news has been discussed a lot lately.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We are interested in what you think is the difference between real and
fake news?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or
just a few words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3 and r13polkom2_ran = 2] [Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13polkom4_1_stilling
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person
1’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person
1’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Professor |
974 |
34.2% |
0.3423550 |
| 2 |
PhD Research Fellow |
939 |
33.0% |
0.3300527 |
| 3 |
Independent researcher without a PhD |
932 |
32.8% |
0.3275923 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_stilling
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person
2’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person
2’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Professor |
936 |
32.9% |
0.3289982 |
| 2 |
PhD Research Fellow |
988 |
34.7% |
0.3472759 |
| 3 |
Independent researcher without a PhD |
921 |
32.4% |
0.3237258 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_kom
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
visibility in the media for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
visibility in the media for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
frequently appears as an expert in the media |
932 |
32.8% |
0.3275923 |
| 2 |
rarely appears as an expert in the media |
967 |
34.0% |
0.3398946 |
| 3 |
never appears as an expert in the media |
946 |
33.3% |
0.3325132 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_kom
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
visibility in the media for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
visibility in the media for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
frequently appears as an expert in the media |
972 |
34.2% |
0.3416520 |
| 2 |
rarely appears as an expert in the media |
915 |
32.2% |
0.3216169 |
| 3 |
never appears as an expert in the media |
958 |
33.7% |
0.3367311 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_gender
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender
for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender
for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1416 |
49.8% |
0.4977153 |
| 2 |
Female |
1429 |
50.2% |
0.5022847 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_gender
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender
for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender
for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1439 |
50.6% |
0.5057996 |
| 2 |
Female |
1406 |
49.4% |
0.4942004 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_parti
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political
standpoint for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political
standpoint for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not known |
227 |
8.0% |
0.07978910 |
| 2 |
Politically neutral |
276 |
9.7% |
0.09701230 |
| 3 |
The Red Party |
243 |
8.5% |
0.08541301 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
256 |
9.0% |
0.08998243 |
| 5 |
The Labour Party |
279 |
9.8% |
0.09806678 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
263 |
9.2% |
0.09244288 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
259 |
9.1% |
0.09103691 |
| 8 |
The Liberal Party |
272 |
9.6% |
0.09560633 |
| 9 |
The Christian Democrats |
273 |
9.6% |
0.09595782 |
| 10 |
The Conservative Party |
266 |
9.3% |
0.09349736 |
| 11 |
The Progress Party |
231 |
8.1% |
0.08119508 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_parti
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political
standpoint for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political
standpoint for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not known |
276 |
9.7% |
0.09701230 |
| 2 |
Politically neutral |
265 |
9.3% |
0.09314587 |
| 3 |
The Red Party |
250 |
8.8% |
0.08787346 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
252 |
8.9% |
0.08857645 |
| 5 |
The Labour Party |
239 |
8.4% |
0.08400703 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
273 |
9.6% |
0.09595782 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
267 |
9.4% |
0.09384886 |
| 8 |
The Liberal Party |
232 |
8.2% |
0.08154657 |
| 9 |
The Christian Democrats |
264 |
9.3% |
0.09279438 |
| 10 |
The Conservative Party |
270 |
9.5% |
0.09490334 |
| 11 |
The Progress Party |
257 |
9.0% |
0.09033392 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_publ
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
publication for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
publication for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in an internationally leading scientific journal |
933 |
32.8% |
0.3279438 |
| 2 |
in a scientific Norwegian journal |
945 |
33.2% |
0.3321617 |
| 3 |
as a Norwegian report |
967 |
34.0% |
0.3398946 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_publ
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
publication for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
publication for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in an internationally leading scientific journal |
972 |
34.2% |
0.3416520 |
| 2 |
in a scientific Norwegian journal |
950 |
33.4% |
0.3339192 |
| 3 |
as a Norwegian report |
923 |
32.4% |
0.3244288 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_funn
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings
for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings
for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers |
1484 |
52.2% |
0.5216169 |
| 2 |
the number of municipalities should not be reduced further by more mergers |
1361 |
47.8% |
0.4783831 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_funn
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings
for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings
for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers |
1461 |
51.4% |
0.5135325 |
| 2 |
the number of municipalities should not be reduced further by more mergers |
1384 |
48.6% |
0.4864675 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_metode
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method
for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method
for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
depth interviews |
982 |
34.5% |
0.3451670 |
| 2 |
experiments |
924 |
32.5% |
0.3247803 |
| 3 |
a survey |
939 |
33.0% |
0.3300527 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_metode
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method
for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method
for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
depth interviews |
975 |
34.3% |
0.3427065 |
| 2 |
experiments |
952 |
33.5% |
0.3346221 |
| 3 |
a survey |
918 |
32.3% |
0.3226714 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_order
|
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable for conjoint experiment. Specifies the order of
the various properties shown in the table that is displayed to the
respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Specifies the order of
the various properties shown in the table that is displayed to the
respondent.
1 = Position and employment 2 = Visibility in the media 3 = Gender 4 =
Political standpoint 5 = The person’s latest scientific article has been
published… 6 = The person’s latest scientific article finds that
immigration is… 7 = The person’s latest scientific article uses…]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13polkom4
|
Variable label:
|
Which person gives the most credible infomration about the consequences
of municipality mergers?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we present two hypothetical persons who research the
consequences of municipal mergers in Norway. Please read the
descriptions of both persons carefully and answer the question
below.
[Prints out the values of r13polkom4_1_stilling,
r13polkom4_2_stilling, r13polkom4_1_kom, r13polkom4_2_kom,
r13polkom4_1_gender, r13polkom4_2_gender, r13polkom4_1_parti,
r13polkom4_2_parti, r13polkom4_1_publ, r13polkom4_2_publ,
r13polkom4_1_funn, r13polkom4_2_funn, r13polkom4_1_metode,
r13polkom4_2_metode]
Let’s say you didn’t have any information other than the above.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to make a choice, which of these two do you think would give
you the most credible information about the consequences of municipality
mergers in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to two people with varying
characteristics. Characteristics of the persons are chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 3 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Person 1 |
1346 |
46.4% |
0.46365828 |
| 2 |
Person 2 |
1351 |
46.5% |
0.46538064 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
206 |
7.1% |
0.07096107 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4306 |
|
NA |
r13pad1
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: Ban on begging in your municipality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are two issues that have been debated in local politics in Norway.
We would like to hear your opinion on the issue.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Firstly, what is your opinion on a ban on begging in your municipality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am in favour of a ban on begging in the municipality |
1705 |
59.0% |
0.59016961 |
| 2 |
I am against a ban on begging in the municipality |
1103 |
38.2% |
0.38179301 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
2.8% |
0.02803738 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4320 |
|
NA |
r13pad2
|
Variable label:
|
How important is the issue of begging bans to you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is the issue of begging bans to you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
179 |
6.2% |
0.06195916 |
| 2 |
Important |
530 |
18.3% |
0.18345448 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
914 |
31.6% |
0.31637245 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
1013 |
35.1% |
0.35064036 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
197 |
6.8% |
0.06818969 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
1.9% |
0.01938387 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4320 |
|
NA |
r13pad3
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: Increase in tolls for diesel cars in your municipality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The second issue is about diesel cars.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on an increase in the tolls for diesel cars in your
municipality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am in favour of an increase in the tolls for diesel cars |
705 |
24.4% |
0.24402908 |
| 2 |
I am against an increase in the tolls for diesel cars |
2101 |
72.7% |
0.72724126 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
2.9% |
0.02872966 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4320 |
|
NA |
r13pad4
|
Variable label:
|
How important is the issue of increased tolls for diesel cars to you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is the issue of increased tolls for diesel cars to you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
487 |
16.9% |
0.16857044 |
| 2 |
Important |
776 |
26.9% |
0.26860505 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
754 |
26.1% |
0.26098996 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
610 |
21.1% |
0.21114573 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
201 |
7.0% |
0.06957425 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
61 |
2.1% |
0.02111457 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4320 |
|
NA |
r13pad6_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly chooses r13pad6a, r13pad7a, and r13pad8a, or r13pad6b,
r13pad7b, and r13pad8b. . Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly chooses r13pad6a, r13pad7a og r13pad8a, or r13pad6b, r13pad7b
or r13pad8b. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent gets R13PAD6A, R13PAD7A, and R13PAD8A |
1483 |
52.2% |
0.5216321 |
| 2 |
Respondent gets R13PAD6B, R13PAD7B, and R13PAD8B |
1360 |
47.8% |
0.4783679 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_sak
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects issue of
a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects issue of
a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the
municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in
favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a
ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging |
1431 |
50.3% |
0.5033415 |
| 2 |
in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial
decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the
"Yes-side"), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars. |
1412 |
49.7% |
0.4966585 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_utfall
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
outcome of the issue of a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group
= 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
outcome of the issue of a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if
r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Yes side won the vote |
1421 |
50.0% |
0.4998241 |
| 2 |
The No side won the vote |
1422 |
50.0% |
0.5001759 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_vinnermargin
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
winning margin in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2
or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
winning margin in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2
or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
. |
974 |
34.3% |
0.3425958 |
| 2 |
with a slight majority. |
921 |
32.4% |
0.3239536 |
| 3 |
With a large majority. |
948 |
33.3% |
0.3334506 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_vinner
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
reaction of the winner in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if
r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
reaction of the winner in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if
r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[BLANK] |
1391 |
48.9% |
0.4892719 |
| 2 |
Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good
decision and that common sense prevailed. |
1452 |
51.1% |
0.5107281 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_avsender
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects statement
made by losing side in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group
= 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects statement
made by losing side in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group
= 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[BLANK] |
368 |
12.9% |
0.1294407 |
| 2 |
The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they
are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. |
428 |
15.1% |
0.1505452 |
| 3 |
The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they
are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight
where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views. |
425 |
14.9% |
0.1494900 |
| 4 |
The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they
are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a
democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. |
408 |
14.4% |
0.1435104 |
| 5 |
The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial
that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. |
402 |
14.1% |
0.1413999 |
| 6 |
The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial
that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was
a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their
views. |
397 |
14.0% |
0.1396412 |
| 7 |
The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial
that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what
living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. |
415 |
14.6% |
0.1459726 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad6a
|
Variable label:
|
Text options: How fair was the way the decision was made.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that
follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging
on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is
a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban
(the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the
“no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel
cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some
residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”),
while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The
decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual
procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal
council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their
opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public,
and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue.
[The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight
majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a
politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that
common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was
against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the
decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against
the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was
wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity
to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that
was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the
decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was
against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed
and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against
the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and
that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both
sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local
newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision -
writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision
was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the way the decision was made?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very fair |
251 |
16.9% |
0.16925152 |
| 2 |
Fair |
864 |
58.3% |
0.58260283 |
| 3 |
Quite fair |
204 |
13.8% |
0.13755900 |
| 4 |
Not very fair |
85 |
5.7% |
0.05731625 |
| 5 |
Not at all fair |
46 |
3.1% |
0.03101821 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.2% |
0.02225219 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5726 |
|
NA |
r13pad6b
|
Variable label:
|
Scale options: How fair was the way the decision was made.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that
follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging
on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is
a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban
(the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the
“no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel
cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some
residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”),
while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The
decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual
procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal
council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their
opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public,
and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue.
[The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight
majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a
politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that
common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was
against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the
decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against
the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was
wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity
to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that
was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the
decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was
against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed
and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against
the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and
that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both
sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local
newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision -
writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision
was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the way the decision was made?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please answer on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is most fair, and 5 is not
fair.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 Most fair |
584 |
42.9% |
0.42941176 |
| 2 |
2 |
413 |
30.4% |
0.30367647 |
| 3 |
3 |
223 |
16.4% |
0.16397059 |
| 4 |
4 |
62 |
4.6% |
0.04558824 |
| 5 |
5 Not fair |
55 |
4.0% |
0.04044118 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.7% |
0.01691176 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5849 |
|
NA |
r13pad7a
|
Variable label:
|
Text options: How reasonable was the decision.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that
follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging
on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is
a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban
(the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the
“no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel
cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some
residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”),
while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The
decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual
procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal
council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their
opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public,
and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won
the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large
majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning
side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed]
[blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision
says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The
leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the
decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was
wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes
you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides
had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local
newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision -
writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision
was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How reasonable do you think the decision was?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very reasonable |
182 |
12.3% |
0.12272421 |
| 2 |
Reasonable |
719 |
48.5% |
0.48482805 |
| 3 |
Somewhat reasonable |
247 |
16.7% |
0.16655428 |
| 4 |
Not very reasonable |
207 |
14.0% |
0.13958193 |
| 5 |
Not reasonable at all |
90 |
6.1% |
0.06068780 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.6% |
0.02562374 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5726 |
|
NA |
r13pad7b
|
Variable label:
|
Scale options: How reasonable was the decision.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that
follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging
on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is
a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban
(the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the
“no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel
cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some
residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”),
while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The
decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual
procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal
council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their
opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public,
and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won
the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large
majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning
side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed]
[blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision
says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The
leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the
decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was
wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes
you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides
had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local
newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision -
writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision
was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How reasonable do you think the decision was?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please answer on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is most reasonable, and 5 is
not reasonable.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 Most reasonable |
430 |
31.6% |
0.31617647 |
| 2 |
2 |
363 |
26.7% |
0.26691176 |
| 3 |
3 |
313 |
23.0% |
0.23014706 |
| 4 |
4 |
123 |
9.0% |
0.09044118 |
| 5 |
5 Not reasonable |
98 |
7.2% |
0.07205882 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02426471 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5849 |
|
NA |
r13pad8a
|
Variable label:
|
Text options: How willing to accept the decision.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that
follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging
on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is
a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban
(the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the
“no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel
cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some
residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”),
while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The
decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual
procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal
council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their
opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public,
and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won
the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large
majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning
side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed]
[blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision
says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The
leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the
decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was
wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes
you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides
had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local
newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision -
writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision
was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
When you think about the actual outcome of the decision, how willing are
you to accept the decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
294 |
19.8% |
0.19824680 |
| 2 |
Willing |
740 |
49.9% |
0.49898854 |
| 3 |
Fairly willing |
232 |
15.6% |
0.15643965 |
| 4 |
Not very willing |
138 |
9.3% |
0.09305462 |
| 5 |
Not at all willing |
47 |
3.2% |
0.03169252 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
2.2% |
0.02157788 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5726 |
|
NA |
r13pad8b
|
Variable label:
|
Scale options: How willing to accept the decision.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that
follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging
on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is
a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban
(the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the
“no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel
cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some
residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”),
while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The
decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual
procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal
council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their
opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public,
and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won
the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large
majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning
side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed]
[blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision
says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The
leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the
decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was
wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes
you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides
had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local
newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision -
writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision
was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
When you think about the actual outcome of the decision, how willing are
you to accept the decision?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please answer on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is most willing, and 5 is
not willing.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 Most willing |
571 |
42.0% |
0.41985294 |
| 2 |
2 |
397 |
29.2% |
0.29191176 |
| 3 |
3 |
216 |
15.9% |
0.15882353 |
| 4 |
4 |
77 |
5.7% |
|
