Codebook

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Round 14

v-102 - 2023-11-06









Produced by ideas2evidence










Citation

Primary investigators

Name Affiliation
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten Coordinator, University of Bergen
Stefan Dahlberg Coordinator, UiB
Erla Løvseth UiB
Sveinung Arnesen NORCE
Hege Høivik Bye UiB
Endre Tvinnereim NORCE
Yvette Peters UiB
Lise Bjånesøy UiB
Erik Knudsen UiB
Gisela Böhm UiB

Producers

Name Affiliation Role
Asle Høgestøl ideas2evidence Coordinator
Øivind Skjervheim ideas2evidence Coordinator
Olav Bjørnebekk ideas2evidence Project Team Member
Jostein Ryssevik ideas2evidence Quality Assurance

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no

Scope

Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in five waves, wave 1, wave 3, wave 8, wave 11 and wave 14. In wave 1, 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave 11, 2069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11). In wave 14, 2036 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 14).

In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. Equally, in wave 14, a gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn.

This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.

14 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.

Mode of Data Collection

The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment.

Recruitment of new members to the panel was completed in several steps.

First, an invitation letter was sent to everyone in the sample. The invitation letter contained the following information: a) description of the project; b) current privacy and procedural privacy guidelines; c) timeframe for the project; d) participants right to opt out of the panel; e) contact information to the project mangers ; f) a unique login code and URL for the Norwegian Citizens’ Panel’s website; g) estimated time to complete the survey (15 minutes).

To maximize the recruitment rate, an incentive has been used in the form of a travel gift card. The value of the travel gift card is 25,000 NOK. To participate in the drawing of the gift card, it is required that the e-mail address is provided. Information about the lottery is included in all correspondence with the respondents.

The invitation letter was posted on January 15, 2019. A reminder was sent to those respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. New respondents received only one reminder, either via a postcard or a text message. The text message was sent to respondents under the age of 60. The postcard was sent to respondents over the age of 60 and to those without a registered mobile number. Respondents were invited to participate in the Norwegian Citizens’ Panel with reference to the invitation letter. The postcard was posted on January 22, 2019. The login code was also given in the postcard. The text message was sent out on January 24, 2019. The text message contained both a login code and a direct link to the survey.

Data collection among old panel members was done in parallel with the recruitment of new respondents. The invitation mail was sent out on January 15, 2019. The first, second, and third reminders were sent to the respondents’ email, on January 23, January 28, and February 1, 2019, respectively. Panel members with a registered mobile number received the last reminder in form of a text message.

Weighting

To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire. 3.3 percent of the net sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different weights have been calculated:

When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.

We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.

Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.


Change Log

Version Release date / Date changed Variable Changes and notes
v-102 2023-11-06 NA Revised release of round 14
NA 2023-10-25 r14Weight4 New variable: Added r14Weight4
NA 2023-10-25 r14Weight4 Variable documentation inserted
v-102 2023-10-25 NA Revised release of round 14
NA 2022-02-01 r14pk8_1 Recoded variable: Recoded to new range 0-10, instead of 1-11. Missing values not affected.
NA 2022-02-01 r14pk8_1 Variable documentation updated
v-101 2020-06-15 NA Revised release of round 14
NA 2020-06-10 r14bk21_kodet Value changed from 12 (unassigned) to 6 (other)
NA 2019-08-12 r14pktilfreds1 Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
NA 2019-08-12 r14pktilfreds3 Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
NA 2019-08-12 r14pktilfreds4 Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
NA 2019-04-01 r14bk33_kodet Added variable based on r14bk33.
NA 2019-04-01 r14bk21_kodet Added variable based on r14bk21.
NA 2019-04-01 r14bk26_kodet Added variable based on r14bk26.
NA 2019-04-01 r14bk27_kodet Added variable based on r14bk27.
NA 2019-04-01 r14pk43_1_kodet Added variable based on r14bk43_1.
NA 2019-04-01 r14pk43_2_kodet Added variable based on r14bk43_2.
NA 2019-04-01 r14p_moved Added new variable.
NA 2019-03-27 r14bk40_recode Added variable based on r14k40.
v-100 2019-02-27 NA Initial release of round 14


Dataset contents

File name Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 14 - v-102-O.sav
Distribution type Public
# Cases 8979
# Variables 120


Variable Documentation

responseid


Variable label: responseid
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14interview_start


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
Technical description: [Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14interview_end


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
Technical description: [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14rekruttert


Variable label: [The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
Literal question: [The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
Technical description: [The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-14]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Wave 1 1777 19.8% 0.1979062
3 Wave 3 1930 21.5% 0.2149460
8 Wave 8 1987 22.1% 0.2212941
11 Wave 11 1249 13.9% 0.1391023
14 Wave 14 2036 22.7% 0.2267513


r14browsertype


Variable label: [Browertype used by respondent ]
Technical description: [Browertype used by respondent ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14browserversion


Variable label: [Browser version used by respondent ]
Technical description: [Browser version used by respondent ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14mobil


Variable label: [Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
Technical description: [Determines if the respondent use mobile ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 other 5897 65.7% 0.6567546
1 mobile phone 3082 34.3% 0.3432454


r14opplosning


Variable label: [Screen resolution of the applied device ]
Technical description: [Screen resolution of the applied device ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14enhetstype


Variable label: [Determines respondents device type. ]
Technical description: [Determines respondents device type. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 PC 6015 67.0% 0.669896425
2 Touch 2942 32.8% 0.327653414
3 Generic 22 0.2% 0.002450161


r14advancedwifeaturesenabled


Variable label: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
Technical description: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14getrenderingmode


Variable label: [Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
Technical description: [Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14group


Variable label: [Subgroup in wave 14. Partially randomized. Newly recruited respondents are designated to group 1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 are designated to group 4. The other respondents are randomized into groups 2, 3 or 4 (with only 12.5% probability of being randomized into group 4). ]
Technical description: [Subgroup in wave 14. Partially randomized. Newly recruited respondents are designated to group 1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 are designated to group 4. The other respondents are randomized into groups 2, 3 or 4 (with only 12.5% probability of being randomized into group 4). ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 g1 2036 22.7% 0.2267513
2 g2 2307 25.7% 0.2569328
3 g3 2236 24.9% 0.2490255
4 g4 2400 26.7% 0.2672903


r14pk15_1


Variable label: People can in general be trusted/ one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others.
Literal question: Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Cannot be careful enough 42 0.5% 0.004677581
1 1 58 0.6% 0.006459517
2 2 128 1.4% 0.014255485
3 3 301 3.4% 0.033522664
4 4 315 3.5% 0.035081858
5 5 820 9.1% 0.091324201
6 6 994 11.1% 0.110702751
7 7 2266 25.2% 0.252366633
8 8 2496 27.8% 0.277981958
9 9 1012 11.3% 0.112707428
10 10 – Most people can be trusted 523 5.8% 0.058247021
97 Not answered 24 0.3% 0.002672903


r14pk53


Variable label: How much confidence in Norwegian politicians.
Literal question: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 114 1.3% 0.012696291
2 To a great extent 2593 28.9% 0.288784943
3 To some extent 4378 48.8% 0.487582136
4 To a small extent 1618 18.0% 0.180198240
5 Not at all 261 2.9% 0.029067825
97 Not answered 15 0.2% 0.001670565


r14pk54


Variable label: How much confidence in Norwegian news media.
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 375 4.2% 0.041764116
2 To a great extent 4188 46.6% 0.466421651
3 To some extent 3512 39.1% 0.391134870
4 To a small extent 709 7.9% 0.078962022
5 Not at all 128 1.4% 0.014255485
97 Not answered 67 0.7% 0.007461855


r14pk12


Variable label: How much confidence in Norwegian parliament (Stortinget).
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 1, 3 or 4. Equivalent to r14pad2 but without “priming”.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 411 6.2% 0.061600719
2 To a great extent 2914 43.7% 0.436750600
3 To some extent 2493 37.4% 0.373651079
4 To a small extent 699 10.5% 0.104766187
5 Not at all 121 1.8% 0.018135492
97 Not answered 34 0.5% 0.005095923
98 Not asked 2307 NA


r14pk9_1


Variable label: Most important political issue for you personally: 1. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14pk9_2


Variable label: Most important political issue for you personally: 2. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14pk9_3


Variable label: Most important political issue for you personally: 3. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14pk43_1


Variable label: Would vote this party if municipal elections tomorrow.
Pre-question text: This coming fall, local elections (municipal and county council elections) will be held.
Literal question: If the municipal elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 292 3.3% 0.032520325
2 The Conservative Party 1992 22.2% 0.221850986
3 The Progress Party 675 7.5% 0.075175409
4 The Liberal Party 343 3.8% 0.038200245
5 The Socialist Left Party 744 8.3% 0.082860007
6 The Centre Party 890 9.9% 0.099120169
7 The Green Party 475 5.3% 0.052901214
8 The Labour Party 2070 23.1% 0.230537922
9 The Red Party 429 4.8% 0.047778149
10 A joint list 17 0.2% 0.001893307
11 A local list 188 2.1% 0.020937744
12 Would cast a blank vote 251 2.8% 0.027954115
13 Would not vote 194 2.2% 0.021605969
14 Not entitled to vote 54 0.6% 0.006014033
15 Other: 317 3.5% 0.035304600
97 Not answered 48 0.5% 0.005345807


r14pk43_1_15_other


Variable label: Other [R14PK43_1]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text: This coming fall, local elections (municipal and county council elections) will be held.
Literal question: If the municipal elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14pk43_1_kodet


Variable label: Would vote this party if municipal elections tomorrow. [coded]
Pre-question text: This coming fall, local elections (municipal and county council elections) will be held.
Literal question: If the municipal elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[This variable contains the values of r14pk43_1 plus coded values of r14pk43_1_15_other]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 292 3.3% 0.032520325
2 The Conservative Party 1993 22.2% 0.221962357
3 The Progress Party 675 7.5% 0.075175409
4 The Liberal Party 343 3.8% 0.038200245
5 The Socialist Left Party 744 8.3% 0.082860007
6 The Centre Party 892 9.9% 0.099342911
7 The Green Party 475 5.3% 0.052901214
8 The Labour Party 2070 23.1% 0.230537922
9 The Red Party 429 4.8% 0.047778149
10 A joint list 17 0.2% 0.001893307
11 A local list 213 2.4% 0.023722018
12 Would cast a blank vote 251 2.8% 0.027954115
13 Would not vote 194 2.2% 0.021605969
14 Not entitled to vote 54 0.6% 0.006014033
15 Other: 289 3.2% 0.032186212
97 Not answered 48 0.5% 0.005345807


r14pk43_2


Variable label: Would vote this party if county council elections tomorrow.
Literal question: And if the county council elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 286 3.2% 0.031852099
2 The Conservative Party 1960 21.8% 0.218287114
3 The Progress Party 675 7.5% 0.075175409
4 The Liberal Party 318 3.5% 0.035415971
5 The Socialist Left Party 743 8.3% 0.082748636
6 The Centre Party 881 9.8% 0.098117830
7 The Green Party 456 5.1% 0.050785165
8 The Labour Party 2069 23.0% 0.230426551
9 The Red Party 412 4.6% 0.045884842
10 A joint list 23 0.3% 0.002561532
11 A local list 88 1.0% 0.009800646
12 Would cast a blank vote 289 3.2% 0.032186212
13 Would not vote 327 3.6% 0.036418309
14 Not entitled to vote 86 1.0% 0.009577904
15 Other: 291 3.2% 0.032408954
97 Not answered 75 0.8% 0.008352823


r14pk43_2_15_other


Variable label: Other [R14PK43_2]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: And if the county council elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14pk43_2_kodet


Variable label: Would vote this party if county council elections tomorrow. [coded]
Literal question: And if the county council elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[This variable contains the values of r14pk43_2 plus coded values of r14pk43_2_15_other]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 286 3.2% 0.031852099
2 The Conservative Party 1960 21.8% 0.218287114
3 The Progress Party 675 7.5% 0.075175409
4 The Liberal Party 318 3.5% 0.035415971
5 The Socialist Left Party 743 8.3% 0.082748636
6 The Centre Party 881 9.8% 0.098117830
7 The Green Party 456 5.1% 0.050785165
8 The Labour Party 2069 23.0% 0.230426551
9 The Red Party 412 4.6% 0.045884842
10 A joint list 23 0.3% 0.002561532
11 A local list 96 1.1% 0.010691614
12 Would cast a blank vote 289 3.2% 0.032186212
13 Would not vote 327 3.6% 0.036418309
14 Not entitled to vote 87 1.0% 0.009689275
15 Other: 282 3.1% 0.031406615
97 Not answered 75 0.8% 0.008352823


r14pk204


Variable label: Would vote this party if parliamentary elections tomorrow.
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 288 3.2% 0.032074841
2 The Conservative Party 1950 21.7% 0.217173405
3 The Progress Party 772 8.6% 0.085978394
4 The Liberal Party 314 3.5% 0.034970487
5 The Socialist Left Party 750 8.4% 0.083528233
6 The Centre Party 890 9.9% 0.099120169
7 The Green Party 424 4.7% 0.047221294
8 The Labour Party 2180 24.3% 0.242788729
9 The Red Party 469 5.2% 0.052232988
10 Would not vote 152 1.7% 0.016928388
11 Would cast a blank vote 251 2.8% 0.027954115
12 Not entitled to vote 222 2.5% 0.024724357
13 Other: 253 2.8% 0.028176857
97 Not answered 64 0.7% 0.007127743


r14pk204_13_other


Variable label: Other [R14PK204]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14pk8_1


Variable label: Placement political left-right scale.
Pre-question text: In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Left 110 1.2% 0.01225081
1 1 370 4.1% 0.04120726
2 2 1024 11.4% 0.11404388
3 3 1378 15.3% 0.15346921
4 4 1071 11.9% 0.11927832
5 5 1398 15.6% 0.15569663
6 6 944 10.5% 0.10513420
7 7 1161 12.9% 0.12930170
8 8 946 10.5% 0.10535694
9 9 293 3.3% 0.03263170
10 10 - Right 194 2.2% 0.02160597
97 Not answered 90 1.0% 0.01002339


r14pk6_1


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Christian Democratic Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
Literal question: The Christian Democratic Party.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1558 17.4% 0.173515982
2 Really dislike 1917 21.3% 0.213498162
3 Dislike somewhat 2241 25.0% 0.249582359
4 Neither dislike nor like 1387 15.4% 0.154471545
5 Like somewhat 1232 13.7% 0.137209043
6 Really like 408 4.5% 0.045439359
7 Intensely like 84 0.9% 0.009355162
97 Not answered 152 1.7% 0.016928388


r14pk6_2


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Conservative Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
Literal question: The Conservative Party.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 488 5.4% 0.05434904
2 Really dislike 1278 14.2% 0.14233211
3 Dislike somewhat 1695 18.9% 0.18877381
4 Neither dislike nor like 1049 11.7% 0.11682815
5 Like somewhat 2041 22.7% 0.22730816
6 Really like 1857 20.7% 0.20681590
7 Intensely like 421 4.7% 0.04688718
97 Not answered 150 1.7% 0.01670565


r14pk6_3


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Progress Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
Literal question: The Progress Party.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 2847 31.7% 0.31707317
2 Really dislike 1713 19.1% 0.19077848
3 Dislike somewhat 1195 13.3% 0.13308832
4 Neither dislike nor like 752 8.4% 0.08375097
5 Like somewhat 1313 14.6% 0.14623009
6 Really like 777 8.7% 0.08653525
7 Intensely like 233 2.6% 0.02594944
97 Not answered 149 1.7% 0.01659428


r14pk6_4


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Liberal Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
Literal question: The Liberal Party.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 898 10.0% 0.10001114
2 Really dislike 1447 16.1% 0.16115380
3 Dislike somewhat 2053 22.9% 0.22864462
4 Neither dislike nor like 2057 22.9% 0.22909010
5 Like somewhat 1779 19.8% 0.19812897
6 Really like 503 5.6% 0.05601960
7 Intensely like 72 0.8% 0.00801871
97 Not answered 170 1.9% 0.01893307


r14pk6_5


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Socialist Left Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
Literal question: The Socialist Left Party.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1154 12.9% 0.12852211
2 Really dislike 1440 16.0% 0.16037421
3 Dislike somewhat 1497 16.7% 0.16672235
4 Neither dislike nor like 1553 17.3% 0.17295913
5 Like somewhat 1681 18.7% 0.18721461
6 Really like 1149 12.8% 0.12796525
7 Intensely like 325 3.6% 0.03619557
97 Not answered 180 2.0% 0.02004678


r14pk6_6


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Centre Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
Literal question: The Centre Party
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 530 5.9% 0.05902662
2 Really dislike 928 10.3% 0.10335227
3 Dislike somewhat 1661 18.5% 0.18498719
4 Neither dislike nor like 2221 24.7% 0.24735494
5 Like somewhat 2204 24.5% 0.24546163
6 Really like 1012 11.3% 0.11270743
7 Intensely like 244 2.7% 0.02717452
97 Not answered 179 2.0% 0.01993540


r14pk6_7


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Green Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
Literal question: The Green Party
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1588 17.7% 0.17685711
2 Really dislike 1316 14.7% 0.14656421
3 Dislike somewhat 1440 16.0% 0.16037421
4 Neither dislike nor like 1441 16.0% 0.16048558
5 Like somewhat 1947 21.7% 0.21683929
6 Really like 881 9.8% 0.09811783
7 Intensely like 203 2.3% 0.02260831
97 Not answered 163 1.8% 0.01815347


r14pk6_8


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Labour Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
Literal question: The Labour Party
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 422 4.7% 0.04699855
2 Really dislike 750 8.4% 0.08352823
3 Dislike somewhat 1513 16.9% 0.16850429
4 Neither dislike nor like 1318 14.7% 0.14678695
5 Like somewhat 2505 27.9% 0.27898430
6 Really like 1925 21.4% 0.21438913
7 Intensely like 407 4.5% 0.04532799
97 Not answered 139 1.5% 0.01548057


r14pk6_9


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Red Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
Literal question: The Red Party
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1858 20.7% 0.20692727
2 Really dislike 1497 16.7% 0.16672235
3 Dislike somewhat 1279 14.2% 0.14244348
4 Neither dislike nor like 1611 17.9% 0.17941864
5 Like somewhat 1479 16.5% 0.16471767
6 Really like 809 9.0% 0.09009912
7 Intensely like 258 2.9% 0.02873371
97 Not answered 188 2.1% 0.02093774


r14bk35


Variable label: Description of the area you live in.
Literal question: Which description best fits the area you live in?
Post-question: We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A city 2060 22.9% 0.229424212
2 A suburb or the outskirts of a city 2026 22.6% 0.225637599
3 A small or medium sized town 2407 26.8% 0.268069941
4 A village 1496 16.7% 0.166610981
5 A sparsely inhabited area 963 10.7% 0.107250251
97 Not answered 27 0.3% 0.003007016


r14pkby2


Variable label: Local environment has gotten safer or more unsafe past couple of years.
Pre-question text: Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
Literal question: How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much safer 157 1.7% 0.017485243
2 Somewhat safer 672 7.5% 0.074841296
3 No change in safety 6177 68.8% 0.687938523
4 Somewhat more unsafe 1744 19.4% 0.194230983
5 Much more unsafe 167 1.9% 0.018598953
97 Not answered 62 0.7% 0.006905001


r14kmb_1


Variable label: Experienced flooding near where you live in the past year.
Literal question: Have you in the past year experienced flooding near where you live?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 4 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 2055 85.6% 0.85625000
2 Yes, I was directly affected – for example in terms of damage to personal property, power outages, lost the Internet connection 43 1.8% 0.01791667
3 Yes, but I was not directly affected 293 12.2% 0.12208333
97 Not answered 9 0.4% 0.00375000
98 Not asked 6579 NA


r14kmb_2_1


Variable label: How likely climate change contributed to flooding near where you live.
Literal question: How likely do you think it is that climate change contributed to the flooding near where you live?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 4 and r14kmb_1 = 2 or 3 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Very unlikely 19 5.7% 0.05654762
2 2 40 11.9% 0.11904762
3 3 24 7.1% 0.07142857
4 4 67 19.9% 0.19940476
5 5 89 26.5% 0.26488095
6 6 56 16.7% 0.16666667
7 7 - Very likely 40 11.9% 0.11904762
97 Not answered 1 0.3% 0.00297619
98 Not asked 8643 NA


r14pktilfreds1


Variable label: How satisfied with your life.
Literal question: All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 2800 31.2% 0.311838735
2 Satisfied 4873 54.3% 0.542710770
3 Somewhat satisfied 1033 11.5% 0.115046219
4 Not very satisfied 204 2.3% 0.022719679
5 Not satisfied at all 38 0.4% 0.004232097
97 Not answered 31 0.3% 0.003452500


r14pk_egeninnsats


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: People should work hard to get ahead without counting on help from others.
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
Literal question: People should work hard to get ahead through their own efforts without counting on help from others.
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 586 8.4% 0.084401556
2 Agree 1889 27.2% 0.272072591
3 Agree somewhat 2358 34.0% 0.339622642
4 Neither agree nor disagree 669 9.6% 0.096356042
5 Disagree somewhat 867 12.5% 0.124873974
6 Disagree 431 6.2% 0.062076912
7 Strongly disagree 117 1.7% 0.016851505
97 Not answered 26 0.4% 0.003744779
98 Not asked 2036 NA


r14pkmeme21


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: Women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention.
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 174 1.9% 0.019378550
2 Agree 426 4.7% 0.047444036
3 Agree somewhat 1480 16.5% 0.164829046
4 Neither agree nor disagree 883 9.8% 0.098340572
5 Disagree somewhat 1141 12.7% 0.127074284
6 Disagree 2632 29.3% 0.293128411
7 Strongly disagree 2197 24.5% 0.244682036
97 Not answered 46 0.5% 0.005123065


r14pk14


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated people like me do not understand it.
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 392 4.4% 0.043657423
2 Agree 1088 12.1% 0.121171623
3 Agree somewhat 2734 30.4% 0.304488250
4 Neither agree nor disagree 909 10.1% 0.101236218
5 Disagree somewhat 1137 12.7% 0.126628801
6 Disagree 2004 22.3% 0.223187437
7 Strongly disagree 668 7.4% 0.074395812
97 Not answered 47 0.5% 0.005234436


r14pk13


Variable label: How much say in what the government does does the political system in Norway allow people like you.
Literal question: How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 79 0.9% 0.008798307
2 To a great extent 958 10.7% 0.106693396
3 To some extent 3929 43.8% 0.437576568
4 To a small extent 3236 36.0% 0.360396481
5 Not at all 711 7.9% 0.079184764
97 Not answered 66 0.7% 0.007350484


r14pk1


Variable label: How interested in politics.
Literal question: In general, how interested are you in politics?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 1137 12.7% 0.126628801
2 Interested 4007 44.6% 0.446263504
3 Somewhat interested 2897 32.3% 0.322641720
4 Not very interested 733 8.2% 0.081634926
5 Not interested at all 147 1.6% 0.016371534
97 Not answered 58 0.6% 0.006459517


r14pktilfreds3


Variable label: How satisfied with the present government in Norway.
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 212 2.4% 0.023610647
2 Satisfied 2118 23.6% 0.235883729
3 Somewhat satisfied 2682 29.9% 0.298696960
4 Not very satisfied 2563 28.5% 0.285443813
5 Not satisfied at all 1318 14.7% 0.146786947
97 Not answered 86 1.0% 0.009577904


r14pktilfreds4


Variable label: How satisfied with the way democracy works in Norway.
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 955 10.6% 0.10635928
2 Satisfied 4300 47.9% 0.47889520
3 Somewhat satisfied 2514 28.0% 0.27998664
4 Not very satisfied 892 9.9% 0.09934291
5 Not satisfied at all 218 2.4% 0.02427887
97 Not answered 100 1.1% 0.01113710


r14pk102


Variable label: How positive or negative to Norwegian EU membership.
Literal question: How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 295 4.2% 0.042488838
2 Positive 975 14.0% 0.140429209
3 Somewhat positive 878 12.6% 0.126458303
4 Neither negative nor positive 918 13.2% 0.132219502
5 Somewhat negative 1134 16.3% 0.163329973
6 Negative 1523 21.9% 0.219357626
7 Very negative 1177 17.0% 0.169523261
97 Not answered 43 0.6% 0.006193288
98 Not asked 2036 NA


r14pk103


Variable label: How great advantage or disadvantage is EEA agreement for Norway.
Literal question: How much of an advantage or disadvantage would you say the EEA Agreement represents for Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A very great advantage 571 8.2% 0.08224111
2 A great advantage 1810 26.1% 0.26069422
3 An advantage to some extent 2239 32.2% 0.32248308
4 Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage 836 12.0% 0.12040905
5 A disadvantage to some extent 921 13.3% 0.13265159
6 A great disadvantage 321 4.6% 0.04623362
7 A very great disadvantage 142 2.0% 0.02045225
97 Not answered 103 1.5% 0.01483509
98 Not asked 2036 NA


r14kmc_ran


Variable label: [Randomizes the order of r14kmc_1 and r14kmc_2 if r14group = 3. Randomizes if r14group = 3]
Technical description: [Randomizes the order of r14kmc_1 and r14kmc_2 if r14group = 3. Randomizes if r14group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2230] [Invalid:6749] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group 1: First gets "How serious a threat is climate change overall?" 1089 48.8% 0.4883408
2 Group 2: First gets "How serious a threat is climate change to you personally?" 1141 51.2% 0.5116592
Sysmiss 6749 NA


r14kmc_1


Variable label: How serious a threat is climate change: Overall.
Literal question: How serious a threat is climate change overall?
Technical description: [The order of r14kmc_1 and r14kmc_2 depends on the value in r14kmc_ran. Asked if r14group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very serious 900 40.3% 0.402504472
2 Serious 777 34.7% 0.347495528
3 Somewhat serious 406 18.2% 0.181574240
4 Not very serious 99 4.4% 0.044275492
5 Not a threat 40 1.8% 0.017889088
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.006261181
98 Not asked 6743 NA


r14kmc_2


Variable label: How serious a threat is climate change: To you personally.
Literal question: How serious a threat is climate change to you personally?
Technical description: [The order of r14kmc_1 and r14kmc_2 depends on the value in r14kmc_ran. Asked if r14group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very serious 214 9.6% 0.095706619
2 Serious 600 26.8% 0.268336315
3 Somewhat serious 729 32.6% 0.326028623
4 Not very serious 511 22.9% 0.228533095
5 Not a threat 164 7.3% 0.073345259
97 Not answered 18 0.8% 0.008050089
98 Not asked 6743 NA


r14kma_1


Variable label: Heard about IPCCs report on impact of global warming exceeding 1.5 degrees.
Pre-question text: The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC is an international working group of scientists who regularly publish reports to summarize scientific assessment on climate change. In October 2018, they published a special report on the impact of global warming exceeding 1.5 degrees.
Literal question: Have you heard about this report?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 3 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 1752 78.4% 0.783542039
2 No 470 21.0% 0.210196780
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.006261181
98 Not asked 6743 NA


r14kma_2_1


Variable label: Heard about IPCCs report where: Social media.
Pre-question text: Where did you hear about the report?
Literal question: In social media, such as Twitter or Facebook
Post-question: You can select multiple options.
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In social media, such as Twitter or Facebook 393 22.4% 0.2243150685
97 Not answered 1 0.1% 0.0005707763
98 Not asked 7227 NA
0 1358 77.5% 0.7751141553


r14kma_2_2


Variable label: Heard about IPCCs report where: Newspapers or TV.
Pre-question text: Where did you hear about the report?
Literal question: In newspapers or on TV
Post-question: You can select multiple options.
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In newspapers or on TV 1656 94.5% 0.9452054795
97 Not answered 1 0.1% 0.0005707763
98 Not asked 7227 NA
0 95 5.4% 0.0542237443


r14kma_2_3


Variable label: Heard about IPCCs report where: Scientific publication.
Pre-question text: Where did you hear about the report?
Literal question: In a scientific publication
Post-question: You can select multiple options.
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In a scientific publication 140 8.0% 0.0799086758
97 Not answered 1 0.1% 0.0005707763
98 Not asked 7227 NA
0 1611 92.0% 0.9195205479


r14kma_2_4


Variable label: Heard about IPCCs report where: Have read official summary for policymakers.
Pre-question text: Where did you hear about the report?
Literal question: I have read the official summary for policymakers
Post-question: You can select multiple options.
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I have read the official summary for policymakers 68 3.9% 0.0388127854
97 Not answered 1 0.1% 0.0005707763
98 Not asked 7227 NA
0 1683 96.1% 0.9606164384


r14kma_2_5


Variable label: Heard about IPCCs report where: Have read parts of the report.
Pre-question text: Where did you hear about the report?
Literal question: I have read parts of the report
Post-question: You can select multiple options.
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I have read parts of the report 114 6.5% 0.0650684932
97 Not answered 1 0.1% 0.0005707763
98 Not asked 7227 NA
0 1637 93.4% 0.9343607306


r14kma_2_6


Variable label: Heard about IPCCs report where: Have read report in full.
Pre-question text: Where did you hear about the report?
Literal question: I have read the report in full
Post-question: You can select multiple options.
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I have read the report in full 4 0.2% 0.0022831050
97 Not answered 1 0.1% 0.0005707763
98 Not asked 7227 NA
0 1747 99.7% 0.9971461187


r14pkkm42


Variable label: All new cars sold from 2025 should/should not be electric.
Pre-question text: The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
Literal question: Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run on hydrogen 3358 37.4% 0.37398374
2 In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars which run on diesel or petrol. 5511 61.4% 0.61376545
97 Not answered 110 1.2% 0.01225081


r14pkkm4


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: Should not allow oil and gas extraction in Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja.
Pre-question text: Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
Literal question: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja areas.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 2870 32.0% 0.319634703
2 Agree 1600 17.8% 0.178193563
3 Agree somewhat 1045 11.6% 0.116382671
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1286 14.3% 0.143223076
5 Disagree somewhat 799 8.9% 0.088985410
6 Disagree 811 9.0% 0.090321862
7 Strongly disagree 501 5.6% 0.055796859
97 Not answered 67 0.7% 0.007461855


r14pkkm2


Variable label: How concerned about climate change.
Literal question: How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all concerned 313 3.5% 0.034859116
2 Not very conceerned 1162 12.9% 0.129413075
3 Slightly concerned 2687 29.9% 0.299253814
4 Very concerned 2984 33.2% 0.332330995
5 Extremely concerned 1780 19.8% 0.198240339
97 Not answered 53 0.6% 0.005902662


r14pk_vekst


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
Literal question: Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 153 2.2% 0.022036584
2 Agree 500 7.2% 0.072014979
3 Agree somewhat 1308 18.8% 0.188391185
4 Neither agree nor disagree 867 12.5% 0.124873974
5 Disagree somewhat 1627 23.4% 0.234336742
6 Disagree 1641 23.6% 0.236353161
7 Strongly disagree 802 11.6% 0.115512027
97 Not answered 45 0.6% 0.006481348
98 Not asked 2036 NA


r14pkmeme9


Variable label: Should be easier/harder for refugees to be granted residence in Norway.
Literal question: What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much easier 215 2.4% 0.023944760
2 Easier 859 9.6% 0.095667669
3 Somewhat easier 1620 18.0% 0.180420982
4 Same as today 3200 35.6% 0.356387126
5 Slightly more difficult 1383 15.4% 0.154026061
6 More difficult 884 9.8% 0.098451943
7 Much more difficult 734 8.2% 0.081746297
97 Not answered 84 0.9% 0.009355162


r14pkdv5


Variable label: How great advantage or disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here.
Literal question: In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very great advantage 204 2.3% 0.022719679
2 Great advantage 1158 12.9% 0.128967591
3 Slightly advantageous 3193 35.6% 0.355607529
4 Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage 1655 18.4% 0.184318966
5 A slight disadvantage 1740 19.4% 0.193785499
6 A great disadvantage 588 6.5% 0.065486134
7 Very great disadvantage 352 3.9% 0.039202584
97 Not answered 89 1.0% 0.009912017


r14pk101


Variable label: How goood or poor are preconditions for integrating refugees in Norwegian society.
Literal question: As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 387 4.3% 0.04310057
2 Good 2341 26.1% 0.26071946
3 Somewhat good 2001 22.3% 0.22285332
4 Neither good nor bad 1061 11.8% 0.11816461
5 Somewhat poor 1733 19.3% 0.19300590
6 Poor 1047 11.7% 0.11660541
7 Very poor 282 3.1% 0.03140662
97 Not answered 127 1.4% 0.01414411


r14pk10


Variable label: Perception of current economic situation in Norway.
Literal question: How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? Do you think it is:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 2115 23.6% 0.235549616
2 Good 4852 54.0% 0.540371979
3 Quite good 1237 13.8% 0.137765898
4 Neither good nor bad 354 3.9% 0.039425326
5 Quite bad 249 2.8% 0.027731373
6 Bad 71 0.8% 0.007907339
7 Very bad 21 0.2% 0.002338791
97 Not answered 80 0.9% 0.008909678


r14pk100


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: The people should be conferred by referendums if municipalities are merged in future.
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
Literal question: When municipalities are to be merged in the future, the public shuld be allowed to have their say on the matter through referendums.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 2369 26.4% 0.26383784
2 Agree 2443 27.2% 0.27207930
3 Agree somewhat 1416 15.8% 0.15770130
4 Neither agree nor disagree 796 8.9% 0.08865130
5 Disagree somewhat 703 7.8% 0.07829380
6 Disagree 876 9.8% 0.09756098
7 Strongly disagree 285 3.2% 0.03174073
97 Not answered 91 1.0% 0.01013476


r14pk_sentral


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: Government show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
Literal question: Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 1471 21.2% 0.211868069
2 Agree 1758 25.3% 0.253204667
3 Agree somewhat 1530 22.0% 0.220365836
4 Neither agree nor disagree 958 13.8% 0.137980700
5 Disagree somewhat 450 6.5% 0.064813481
6 Disagree 562 8.1% 0.080944837
7 Strongly disagree 150 2.2% 0.021604494
97 Not answered 64 0.9% 0.009217917
98 Not asked 2036 NA


r14pk60


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: Government should work more to reduce income differences in society.
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question: The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income differences in society.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 2634 29.3% 0.29335115
2 Agree 2565 28.6% 0.28566656
3 Agree somewhat 1738 19.4% 0.19356276
4 Neither agree nor disagree 883 9.8% 0.09834057
5 Disagree somewhat 559 6.2% 0.06225638
6 Disagree 392 4.4% 0.04365742
7 Strongly disagree 101 1.1% 0.01124847
97 Not answered 107 1.2% 0.01191669


r14pk29


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question: Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 2029 22.6% 0.22597171
2 Agree 1961 21.8% 0.21839849
3 Agree somewhat 1442 16.1% 0.16059695
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1293 14.4% 0.14400267
5 Disagree somewhat 783 8.7% 0.08720347
6 Disagree 971 10.8% 0.10814122
7 Strongly disagree 397 4.4% 0.04421428
97 Not answered 103 1.1% 0.01147121


r14pkdv55


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: Should be able to send children to muslim schools which follow national curriculum and teach Islam.
Pre-question text: Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith.
Literal question: How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 282 3.1% 0.03140662
2 Agree 1022 11.4% 0.11382114
3 Agree somewhat 1100 12.3% 0.12250807
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1380 15.4% 0.15369195
5 Disagree somewhat 1085 12.1% 0.12083751
6 Disagree 1759 19.6% 0.19590155
7 Strongly disagree 2244 25.0% 0.24991647
97 Not answered 107 1.2% 0.01191669


r14pk_guns


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: Norwegian police should be armed.
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norwegian police should be armed?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 1069 11.9% 0.11905557
2 Agree 1769 19.7% 0.19701526
3 Agree somewhat 2129 23.7% 0.23710881
4 Neither agree nor disagree 870 9.7% 0.09689275
5 Disagree somewhat 1040 11.6% 0.11582582
6 Disagree 1195 13.3% 0.13308832
7 Strongly disagree 805 9.0% 0.08965364
97 Not answered 102 1.1% 0.01135984


r14pkby3


Variable label: How afraid of a new terrorist attack in Norway.
Literal question: To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 443 4.9% 0.04933734
2 To a great extent 1393 15.5% 0.15513977
3 Somewhat 3929 43.8% 0.43757657
4 Slightly 2701 30.1% 0.30081301
5 Not at all 412 4.6% 0.04588484
97 Not answered 101 1.1% 0.01124847


r14pk52


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: Authorities should introduce measures to protect from terrorism even at the expense of privacy.
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question: The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 875 9.7% 0.09744960
2 Agree 2109 23.5% 0.23488139
3 Agree somewhat 2506 27.9% 0.27909567
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1062 11.8% 0.11827598
5 Disagree somewhat 986 11.0% 0.10981178
6 Disagree 939 10.5% 0.10457735
7 Strongly disagree 399 4.4% 0.04443702
97 Not answered 103 1.1% 0.01147121


r14pad1_ran


Variable label: [Randomizes if r14group = 2. The respondent is shown a randomly selected vignette.]
Literal question:

Vignette 1 Read the text below, and click or tap “next”. In recent years, there have been several terrorist attacks, including in Norway. Norwegian authorities consider terror to be one of the main threats to Norwegian society.

Vignette 2 Read the text below, and click or tap “next”. In recent years, there have been several terrorist attacks, including in Norway. Norwegian authorities consider terror to be one of the main threats to Norwegian society, and have for several years worked systematically to build capacity for preventing terrorism and terrorist incidents, and the ability to manage in the event of a terrorist incident and its aftermath. Several public reports and sources point to the fact that the government’s capacity and readiness has increased in several areas.

Vignette 3 Read the text below, and click or tap “next”. In recent years, there have been several terrorist attacks, including in Norway. Norwegian authorities consider terror to be one of the main threats to Norwegian society, and have for several years worked systematically to build capacity for preventing terrorism and terrorist incidents, and the ability to manage in the event of a terrorist incident and its aftermath. Several public reports and sources point to the fact that the government’s capacity (and readiness) is still inadequate.
Technical description: [Randomizes if r14group = 2. The respondent is shown a randomly selected vignette.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2287] [Invalid:6692] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Vignette 1 738 32.3% 0.3226935
2 Vignette 2 746 32.6% 0.3261915
3 Vignette 3 803 35.1% 0.3511150
Sysmiss 6692 NA


r14pad2


Variable label: Degree of confidence in Stortinget (Parliament).
Pre-question text: [Randomly chosen vignette. See r14pad1_ran]]
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Storting (Parliament)?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 2. The order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4 is randomized. See r14pad_order. The respondent was shown a randomly selected vignette before r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. See r14pad1_ran.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 70 3.0% 0.03034244
2 High confidence 965 41.8% 0.41829215
3 Some confidence 965 41.8% 0.41829215
4 Low confidence 250 10.8% 0.10836584
5 No confidence 28 1.2% 0.01213697
97 Not answered 29 1.3% 0.01257044
98 Not asked 6672 NA


r14pad3


Variable label: Degree of confidence in the Government.
Pre-question text: [Randomly chosen vignette. See r14pad1_ran]]
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Government?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 2. The order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4 is randomized. See r14pad_order. The respondent was shown a randomly selected vignette before r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. See r14pad1_ran.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 46 2.0% 0.01993932
2 High confidence 699 30.3% 0.30299090
3 Some confidence 1003 43.5% 0.43476376
4 Low confidence 453 19.6% 0.19635891
5 No confidence 78 3.4% 0.03381014
97 Not answered 28 1.2% 0.01213697
98 Not asked 6672 NA


r14pad4


Variable label: Degree of confidence in the police.
Pre-question text: [Randomly chosen vignette. See r14pad1_ran]]
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the police?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 2. The order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4 is randomized. See r14pad_order. The respondent was shown a randomly selected vignette before r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. See r14pad1_ran.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 188 8.1% 0.081491114
2 High confidence 1324 57.4% 0.573905505
3 Some confidence 641 27.8% 0.277850022
4 Low confidence 105 4.6% 0.045513654
5 No confidence 21 0.9% 0.009102731
97 Not answered 28 1.2% 0.012136974
98 Not asked 6672 NA


r14pad_order


Variable label: [Background variable. Specifies the order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. The order is randomized]
Technical description:

[ Background variable. Specifies the order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. The order is randomized.

1 = r14pad2 2 = r14pad3 3 = r14pad4]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r14pad5


Variable label: What capacity do Norwegian authorities have toward preventing and managing terrorist incidents and their aftermath.
Literal question: What capacity do you think the Norwegian authorities have when it comes to preventing terrorism and terrorist incidents, and managing terrorists incidents and their aftermath?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 2 ]
Technical attributes: [Qu