Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
Coordinator, UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Sveinung Arnesen
|
NORCE
|
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
NORCE
|
|
Yvette Peters
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project Team Member
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality Assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in five
waves, wave 1, wave 3, wave 8, wave 11 and wave 14. In wave 1, 4.870
panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3,
5.623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8,
4245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave
11, 2069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11).
In wave 14, 2036 panel members were recruited (see documentation from
wave 14).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure
of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000
individuals. In wave 11, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people
was drawn. Equally, in wave 14, a gross sample of 14 000 people was
drawn.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
14 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the
register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c)
address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded
people with no current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment.
Recruitment of new members to the panel was completed in several steps.
First, an invitation letter was sent to everyone in the sample. The
invitation letter contained the following information: a) description of
the project; b) current privacy and procedural privacy guidelines; c)
timeframe for the project; d) participants right to opt out of the
panel; e) contact information to the project mangers ; f) a unique login
code and URL for the Norwegian Citizens’ Panel’s website; g) estimated
time to complete the survey (15 minutes).
To maximize the recruitment rate, an incentive has been used in the form
of a travel gift card. The value of the travel gift card is 25,000 NOK.
To participate in the drawing of the gift card, it is required that the
e-mail address is provided. Information about the lottery is included in
all correspondence with the respondents.
The invitation letter was posted on January 15, 2019. A reminder was
sent to those respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b)
had not completed the survey. New respondents received only one
reminder, either via a postcard or a text message. The text message was
sent to respondents under the age of 60. The postcard was sent to
respondents over the age of 60 and to those without a registered mobile
number. Respondents were invited to participate in the Norwegian
Citizens’ Panel with reference to the invitation letter. The postcard
was posted on January 22, 2019. The login code was also given in the
postcard. The text message was sent out on January 24, 2019. The text
message contained both a login code and a direct link to the survey.
Data collection among old panel members was done in parallel with the
recruitment of new respondents. The invitation mail was sent out on
January 15, 2019. The first, second, and third reminders were sent to
the respondents’ email, on January 23, January 28, and February 1, 2019,
respectively. Panel members with a registered mobile number received the
last reminder in form of a text message.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights,
the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender
and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in
the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register.
Information regarding the level of education is provided by the
respondents when answering the questionnaire. 3.3 percent of the net
sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different
weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 14
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r14Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r14Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r14Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-102
|
2023-10-25
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 14
|
|
NA
|
2022-02-01
|
r14pk8_1
|
Recoded
variable: Recoded to new range 0-10, instead of 1-11. Missing values not
affected.
|
|
NA
|
2022-02-01
|
r14pk8_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 14
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-10
|
r14bk21_kodet
|
Value
changed from 12 (unassigned) to 6 (other)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r14pktilfreds1
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r14pktilfreds3
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r14pktilfreds4
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14bk33_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk33.
|
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14bk21_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk21.
|
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14bk26_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk26.
|
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14bk27_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk27.
|
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14pk43_1_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk43_1.
|
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14pk43_2_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk43_2.
|
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14p_moved
|
Added new variable.
|
|
NA
|
2019-03-27
|
r14bk40_recode
|
Added variable based on r14k40.
|
|
v-100
|
2019-02-27
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 14
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 14 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
8979
|
|
# Variables
|
120
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Literal question:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-14]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
1777 |
19.8% |
0.1979062 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
1930 |
21.5% |
0.2149460 |
| 8 |
Wave 8 |
1987 |
22.1% |
0.2212941 |
| 11 |
Wave 11 |
1249 |
13.9% |
0.1391023 |
| 14 |
Wave 14 |
2036 |
22.7% |
0.2267513 |
r14browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondent use mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
other |
5897 |
65.7% |
0.6567546 |
| 1 |
mobile phone |
3082 |
34.3% |
0.3432454 |
r14opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
6015 |
67.0% |
0.669896425 |
| 2 |
Touch |
2942 |
32.8% |
0.327653414 |
| 3 |
Generic |
22 |
0.2% |
0.002450161 |
r14advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14group
|
Variable label:
|
[Subgroup in wave 14. Partially randomized. Newly recruited respondents
are designated to group 1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 are
designated to group 4. The other respondents are randomized into groups
2, 3 or 4 (with only 12.5% probability of being randomized into group
4). ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Subgroup in wave 14. Partially randomized. Newly recruited respondents
are designated to group 1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 are
designated to group 4. The other respondents are randomized into groups
2, 3 or 4 (with only 12.5% probability of being randomized into group
4). ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
g1 |
2036 |
22.7% |
0.2267513 |
| 2 |
g2 |
2307 |
25.7% |
0.2569328 |
| 3 |
g3 |
2236 |
24.9% |
0.2490255 |
| 4 |
g4 |
2400 |
26.7% |
0.2672903 |
r14pk15_1
|
Variable label:
|
People can in general be trusted/ one cannot be careful enough when
dealing with others.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
42 |
0.5% |
0.004677581 |
| 1 |
1 |
58 |
0.6% |
0.006459517 |
| 2 |
2 |
128 |
1.4% |
0.014255485 |
| 3 |
3 |
301 |
3.4% |
0.033522664 |
| 4 |
4 |
315 |
3.5% |
0.035081858 |
| 5 |
5 |
820 |
9.1% |
0.091324201 |
| 6 |
6 |
994 |
11.1% |
0.110702751 |
| 7 |
7 |
2266 |
25.2% |
0.252366633 |
| 8 |
8 |
2496 |
27.8% |
0.277981958 |
| 9 |
9 |
1012 |
11.3% |
0.112707428 |
| 10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
523 |
5.8% |
0.058247021 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.3% |
0.002672903 |
r14pk53
|
Variable label:
|
How much confidence in Norwegian politicians.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
114 |
1.3% |
0.012696291 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
2593 |
28.9% |
0.288784943 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
4378 |
48.8% |
0.487582136 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
1618 |
18.0% |
0.180198240 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
261 |
2.9% |
0.029067825 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.2% |
0.001670565 |
r14pk54
|
Variable label:
|
How much confidence in Norwegian news media.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
375 |
4.2% |
0.041764116 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
4188 |
46.6% |
0.466421651 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
3512 |
39.1% |
0.391134870 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
709 |
7.9% |
0.078962022 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
128 |
1.4% |
0.014255485 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.7% |
0.007461855 |
r14pk12
|
Variable label:
|
How much confidence in Norwegian parliament (Stortinget).
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1, 3 or 4. Equivalent to r14pad2 but without
“priming”.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
411 |
6.2% |
0.061600719 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
2914 |
43.7% |
0.436750600 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
2493 |
37.4% |
0.373651079 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
699 |
10.5% |
0.104766187 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
121 |
1.8% |
0.018135492 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.5% |
0.005095923 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2307 |
|
NA |
r14pk9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue for you personally: 1. [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14pk9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue for you personally: 2. [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14pk9_3
|
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue for you personally: 3. [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14pk43_1
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if municipal elections tomorrow.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This coming fall, local elections (municipal and county council
elections) will be held.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the municipal elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
292 |
3.3% |
0.032520325 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1992 |
22.2% |
0.221850986 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
675 |
7.5% |
0.075175409 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
343 |
3.8% |
0.038200245 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
744 |
8.3% |
0.082860007 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
890 |
9.9% |
0.099120169 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
475 |
5.3% |
0.052901214 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2070 |
23.1% |
0.230537922 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
429 |
4.8% |
0.047778149 |
| 10 |
A joint list |
17 |
0.2% |
0.001893307 |
| 11 |
A local list |
188 |
2.1% |
0.020937744 |
| 12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
251 |
2.8% |
0.027954115 |
| 13 |
Would not vote |
194 |
2.2% |
0.021605969 |
| 14 |
Not entitled to vote |
54 |
0.6% |
0.006014033 |
| 15 |
Other: |
317 |
3.5% |
0.035304600 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.5% |
0.005345807 |
r14pk43_1_15_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R14PK43_1]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This coming fall, local elections (municipal and county council
elections) will be held.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the municipal elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14pk43_1_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if municipal elections tomorrow. [coded]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This coming fall, local elections (municipal and county council
elections) will be held.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the municipal elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[This variable contains the values of r14pk43_1 plus coded values of
r14pk43_1_15_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
292 |
3.3% |
0.032520325 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1993 |
22.2% |
0.221962357 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
675 |
7.5% |
0.075175409 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
343 |
3.8% |
0.038200245 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
744 |
8.3% |
0.082860007 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
892 |
9.9% |
0.099342911 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
475 |
5.3% |
0.052901214 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2070 |
23.1% |
0.230537922 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
429 |
4.8% |
0.047778149 |
| 10 |
A joint list |
17 |
0.2% |
0.001893307 |
| 11 |
A local list |
213 |
2.4% |
0.023722018 |
| 12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
251 |
2.8% |
0.027954115 |
| 13 |
Would not vote |
194 |
2.2% |
0.021605969 |
| 14 |
Not entitled to vote |
54 |
0.6% |
0.006014033 |
| 15 |
Other: |
289 |
3.2% |
0.032186212 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.5% |
0.005345807 |
r14pk43_2
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if county council elections tomorrow.
|
|
Literal question:
|
And if the county council elections were tomorrow, what would you vote
for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
286 |
3.2% |
0.031852099 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1960 |
21.8% |
0.218287114 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
675 |
7.5% |
0.075175409 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
318 |
3.5% |
0.035415971 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
743 |
8.3% |
0.082748636 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
881 |
9.8% |
0.098117830 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
456 |
5.1% |
0.050785165 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2069 |
23.0% |
0.230426551 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
412 |
4.6% |
0.045884842 |
| 10 |
A joint list |
23 |
0.3% |
0.002561532 |
| 11 |
A local list |
88 |
1.0% |
0.009800646 |
| 12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
289 |
3.2% |
0.032186212 |
| 13 |
Would not vote |
327 |
3.6% |
0.036418309 |
| 14 |
Not entitled to vote |
86 |
1.0% |
0.009577904 |
| 15 |
Other: |
291 |
3.2% |
0.032408954 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
0.8% |
0.008352823 |
r14pk43_2_15_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R14PK43_2]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
And if the county council elections were tomorrow, what would you vote
for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14pk43_2_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if county council elections tomorrow. [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
And if the county council elections were tomorrow, what would you vote
for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[This variable contains the values of r14pk43_2 plus coded values of
r14pk43_2_15_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
286 |
3.2% |
0.031852099 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1960 |
21.8% |
0.218287114 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
675 |
7.5% |
0.075175409 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
318 |
3.5% |
0.035415971 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
743 |
8.3% |
0.082748636 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
881 |
9.8% |
0.098117830 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
456 |
5.1% |
0.050785165 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2069 |
23.0% |
0.230426551 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
412 |
4.6% |
0.045884842 |
| 10 |
A joint list |
23 |
0.3% |
0.002561532 |
| 11 |
A local list |
96 |
1.1% |
0.010691614 |
| 12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
289 |
3.2% |
0.032186212 |
| 13 |
Would not vote |
327 |
3.6% |
0.036418309 |
| 14 |
Not entitled to vote |
87 |
1.0% |
0.009689275 |
| 15 |
Other: |
282 |
3.1% |
0.031406615 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
0.8% |
0.008352823 |
r14pk204
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if parliamentary elections tomorrow.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
288 |
3.2% |
0.032074841 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1950 |
21.7% |
0.217173405 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
772 |
8.6% |
0.085978394 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
314 |
3.5% |
0.034970487 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
750 |
8.4% |
0.083528233 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
890 |
9.9% |
0.099120169 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
424 |
4.7% |
0.047221294 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2180 |
24.3% |
0.242788729 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
469 |
5.2% |
0.052232988 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
152 |
1.7% |
0.016928388 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
251 |
2.8% |
0.027954115 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
222 |
2.5% |
0.024724357 |
| 13 |
Other: |
253 |
2.8% |
0.028176857 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
0.7% |
0.007127743 |
r14pk204_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R14PK204]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14pk8_1
|
Variable label:
|
Placement political left-right scale.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right
wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left
politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Left |
110 |
1.2% |
0.01225081 |
| 1 |
1 |
370 |
4.1% |
0.04120726 |
| 2 |
2 |
1024 |
11.4% |
0.11404388 |
| 3 |
3 |
1378 |
15.3% |
0.15346921 |
| 4 |
4 |
1071 |
11.9% |
0.11927832 |
| 5 |
5 |
1398 |
15.6% |
0.15569663 |
| 6 |
6 |
944 |
10.5% |
0.10513420 |
| 7 |
7 |
1161 |
12.9% |
0.12930170 |
| 8 |
8 |
946 |
10.5% |
0.10535694 |
| 9 |
9 |
293 |
3.3% |
0.03263170 |
| 10 |
10 - Right |
194 |
2.2% |
0.02160597 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
1.0% |
0.01002339 |
r14pk6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Christian Democratic Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1558 |
17.4% |
0.173515982 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1917 |
21.3% |
0.213498162 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2241 |
25.0% |
0.249582359 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1387 |
15.4% |
0.154471545 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1232 |
13.7% |
0.137209043 |
| 6 |
Really like |
408 |
4.5% |
0.045439359 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
84 |
0.9% |
0.009355162 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
152 |
1.7% |
0.016928388 |
r14pk6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Conservative Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
488 |
5.4% |
0.05434904 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1278 |
14.2% |
0.14233211 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1695 |
18.9% |
0.18877381 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1049 |
11.7% |
0.11682815 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2041 |
22.7% |
0.22730816 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1857 |
20.7% |
0.20681590 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
421 |
4.7% |
0.04688718 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
150 |
1.7% |
0.01670565 |
r14pk6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Progress Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2847 |
31.7% |
0.31707317 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1713 |
19.1% |
0.19077848 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1195 |
13.3% |
0.13308832 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
752 |
8.4% |
0.08375097 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1313 |
14.6% |
0.14623009 |
| 6 |
Really like |
777 |
8.7% |
0.08653525 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
233 |
2.6% |
0.02594944 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
149 |
1.7% |
0.01659428 |
r14pk6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Liberal Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
898 |
10.0% |
0.10001114 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1447 |
16.1% |
0.16115380 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2053 |
22.9% |
0.22864462 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2057 |
22.9% |
0.22909010 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1779 |
19.8% |
0.19812897 |
| 6 |
Really like |
503 |
5.6% |
0.05601960 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
72 |
0.8% |
0.00801871 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
170 |
1.9% |
0.01893307 |
r14pk6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Socialist Left Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1154 |
12.9% |
0.12852211 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1440 |
16.0% |
0.16037421 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1497 |
16.7% |
0.16672235 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1553 |
17.3% |
0.17295913 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1681 |
18.7% |
0.18721461 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1149 |
12.8% |
0.12796525 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
325 |
3.6% |
0.03619557 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
180 |
2.0% |
0.02004678 |
r14pk6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Centre Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
530 |
5.9% |
0.05902662 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
928 |
10.3% |
0.10335227 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1661 |
18.5% |
0.18498719 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2221 |
24.7% |
0.24735494 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2204 |
24.5% |
0.24546163 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1012 |
11.3% |
0.11270743 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
244 |
2.7% |
0.02717452 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
179 |
2.0% |
0.01993540 |
r14pk6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Green Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1588 |
17.7% |
0.17685711 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1316 |
14.7% |
0.14656421 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1440 |
16.0% |
0.16037421 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1441 |
16.0% |
0.16048558 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1947 |
21.7% |
0.21683929 |
| 6 |
Really like |
881 |
9.8% |
0.09811783 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
203 |
2.3% |
0.02260831 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
163 |
1.8% |
0.01815347 |
r14pk6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Labour Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
422 |
4.7% |
0.04699855 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
750 |
8.4% |
0.08352823 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1513 |
16.9% |
0.16850429 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1318 |
14.7% |
0.14678695 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2505 |
27.9% |
0.27898430 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1925 |
21.4% |
0.21438913 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
407 |
4.5% |
0.04532799 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
139 |
1.5% |
0.01548057 |
r14pk6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Red Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1858 |
20.7% |
0.20692727 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1497 |
16.7% |
0.16672235 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1279 |
14.2% |
0.14244348 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1611 |
17.9% |
0.17941864 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1479 |
16.5% |
0.16471767 |
| 6 |
Really like |
809 |
9.0% |
0.09009912 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
258 |
2.9% |
0.02873371 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
188 |
2.1% |
0.02093774 |
r14bk35
|
Variable label:
|
Description of the area you live in.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
2060 |
22.9% |
0.229424212 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
2026 |
22.6% |
0.225637599 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
2407 |
26.8% |
0.268069941 |
| 4 |
A village |
1496 |
16.7% |
0.166610981 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
963 |
10.7% |
0.107250251 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.3% |
0.003007016 |
r14pkby2
|
Variable label:
|
Local environment has gotten safer or more unsafe past couple of years.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past
couple of years.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much safer |
157 |
1.7% |
0.017485243 |
| 2 |
Somewhat safer |
672 |
7.5% |
0.074841296 |
| 3 |
No change in safety |
6177 |
68.8% |
0.687938523 |
| 4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
1744 |
19.4% |
0.194230983 |
| 5 |
Much more unsafe |
167 |
1.9% |
0.018598953 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
62 |
0.7% |
0.006905001 |
r14kmb_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experienced flooding near where you live in the past year.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you in the past year experienced flooding near where you live?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 4 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
2055 |
85.6% |
0.85625000 |
| 2 |
Yes, I was directly affected – for example in terms of damage to personal
property, power outages, lost the Internet connection |
43 |
1.8% |
0.01791667 |
| 3 |
Yes, but I was not directly affected |
293 |
12.2% |
0.12208333 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.4% |
0.00375000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6579 |
|
NA |
r14kmb_2_1
|
Variable label:
|
How likely climate change contributed to flooding near where you live.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely do you think it is that climate change contributed to the
flooding near where you live?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 4 and r14kmb_1 = 2 or 3 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Very unlikely |
19 |
5.7% |
0.05654762 |
| 2 |
2 |
40 |
11.9% |
0.11904762 |
| 3 |
3 |
24 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
| 4 |
4 |
67 |
19.9% |
0.19940476 |
| 5 |
5 |
89 |
26.5% |
0.26488095 |
| 6 |
6 |
56 |
16.7% |
0.16666667 |
| 7 |
7 - Very likely |
40 |
11.9% |
0.11904762 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.3% |
0.00297619 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8643 |
|
NA |
r14pktilfreds1
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with your life.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
2800 |
31.2% |
0.311838735 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
4873 |
54.3% |
0.542710770 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1033 |
11.5% |
0.115046219 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
204 |
2.3% |
0.022719679 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
38 |
0.4% |
0.004232097 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
0.3% |
0.003452500 |
r14pk_egeninnsats
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: People should work hard to get ahead without counting on
help from others.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
People should work hard to get ahead through their own efforts without
counting on help from others.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
586 |
8.4% |
0.084401556 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1889 |
27.2% |
0.272072591 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2358 |
34.0% |
0.339622642 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
669 |
9.6% |
0.096356042 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
867 |
12.5% |
0.124873974 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
431 |
6.2% |
0.062076912 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
117 |
1.7% |
0.016851505 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.4% |
0.003744779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2036 |
|
NA |
r14pkmeme21
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual
attention.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own
responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
174 |
1.9% |
0.019378550 |
| 2 |
Agree |
426 |
4.7% |
0.047444036 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1480 |
16.5% |
0.164829046 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
883 |
9.8% |
0.098340572 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1141 |
12.7% |
0.127074284 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2632 |
29.3% |
0.293128411 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
2197 |
24.5% |
0.244682036 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
0.5% |
0.005123065 |
r14pk14
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated people like me do
not understand it.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not
understand what it’s about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
392 |
4.4% |
0.043657423 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1088 |
12.1% |
0.121171623 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2734 |
30.4% |
0.304488250 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
909 |
10.1% |
0.101236218 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1137 |
12.7% |
0.126628801 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2004 |
22.3% |
0.223187437 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
668 |
7.4% |
0.074395812 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
47 |
0.5% |
0.005234436 |
r14pk13
|
Variable label:
|
How much say in what the government does does the political system in
Norway allow people like you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like
you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
79 |
0.9% |
0.008798307 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
958 |
10.7% |
0.106693396 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
3929 |
43.8% |
0.437576568 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
3236 |
36.0% |
0.360396481 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
711 |
7.9% |
0.079184764 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
66 |
0.7% |
0.007350484 |
r14pk1
|
Variable label:
|
How interested in politics.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
1137 |
12.7% |
0.126628801 |
| 2 |
Interested |
4007 |
44.6% |
0.446263504 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
2897 |
32.3% |
0.322641720 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
733 |
8.2% |
0.081634926 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
147 |
1.6% |
0.016371534 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
0.6% |
0.006459517 |
r14pktilfreds3
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the present government in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
212 |
2.4% |
0.023610647 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2118 |
23.6% |
0.235883729 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2682 |
29.9% |
0.298696960 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
2563 |
28.5% |
0.285443813 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
1318 |
14.7% |
0.146786947 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
86 |
1.0% |
0.009577904 |
r14pktilfreds4
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the way democracy works in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
955 |
10.6% |
0.10635928 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
4300 |
47.9% |
0.47889520 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2514 |
28.0% |
0.27998664 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
892 |
9.9% |
0.09934291 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
218 |
2.4% |
0.02427887 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
100 |
1.1% |
0.01113710 |
r14pk102
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative to Norwegian EU membership.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
295 |
4.2% |
0.042488838 |
| 2 |
Positive |
975 |
14.0% |
0.140429209 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
878 |
12.6% |
0.126458303 |
| 4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
918 |
13.2% |
0.132219502 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
1134 |
16.3% |
0.163329973 |
| 6 |
Negative |
1523 |
21.9% |
0.219357626 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
1177 |
17.0% |
0.169523261 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.6% |
0.006193288 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2036 |
|
NA |
r14pk103
|
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is EEA agreement for Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much of an advantage or disadvantage would you say the EEA Agreement
represents for Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
571 |
8.2% |
0.08224111 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
1810 |
26.1% |
0.26069422 |
| 3 |
An advantage to some extent |
2239 |
32.2% |
0.32248308 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
836 |
12.0% |
0.12040905 |
| 5 |
A disadvantage to some extent |
921 |
13.3% |
0.13265159 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
321 |
4.6% |
0.04623362 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
142 |
2.0% |
0.02045225 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
103 |
1.5% |
0.01483509 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2036 |
|
NA |
r14kmc_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes the order of r14kmc_1 and r14kmc_2 if r14group = 3.
Randomizes if r14group = 3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes the order of r14kmc_1 and r14kmc_2 if r14group = 3.
Randomizes if r14group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2230] [Invalid:6749]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1: First gets "How serious a threat is climate change overall?" |
1089 |
48.8% |
0.4883408 |
| 2 |
Group 2: First gets "How serious a threat is climate change to you personally?" |
1141 |
51.2% |
0.5116592 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6749 |
|
NA |
r14kmc_1
|
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat is climate change: Overall.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change overall?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The order of r14kmc_1 and r14kmc_2 depends on the value in r14kmc_ran.
Asked if r14group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
900 |
40.3% |
0.402504472 |
| 2 |
Serious |
777 |
34.7% |
0.347495528 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
406 |
18.2% |
0.181574240 |
| 4 |
Not very serious |
99 |
4.4% |
0.044275492 |
| 5 |
Not a threat |
40 |
1.8% |
0.017889088 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.006261181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6743 |
|
NA |
r14kmc_2
|
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat is climate change: To you personally.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change to you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The order of r14kmc_1 and r14kmc_2 depends on the value in r14kmc_ran.
Asked if r14group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
214 |
9.6% |
0.095706619 |
| 2 |
Serious |
600 |
26.8% |
0.268336315 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
729 |
32.6% |
0.326028623 |
| 4 |
Not very serious |
511 |
22.9% |
0.228533095 |
| 5 |
Not a threat |
164 |
7.3% |
0.073345259 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.8% |
0.008050089 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6743 |
|
NA |
r14kma_1
|
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report on impact of global warming exceeding 1.5
degrees.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC is an
international working group of scientists who regularly publish reports
to summarize scientific assessment on climate change. In October 2018,
they published a special report on the impact of global warming
exceeding 1.5 degrees.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard about this report?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1752 |
78.4% |
0.783542039 |
| 2 |
No |
470 |
21.0% |
0.210196780 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.006261181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6743 |
|
NA |
r14kma_2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report where: Social media.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where did you hear about the report?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In social media, such as Twitter or Facebook
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can select multiple options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In social media, such as Twitter or Facebook |
393 |
22.4% |
0.2243150685 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005707763 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7227 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1358 |
77.5% |
0.7751141553 |
r14kma_2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report where: Newspapers or TV.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where did you hear about the report?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In newspapers or on TV
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can select multiple options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In newspapers or on TV |
1656 |
94.5% |
0.9452054795 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005707763 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7227 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
95 |
5.4% |
0.0542237443 |
r14kma_2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report where: Scientific publication.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where did you hear about the report?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In a scientific publication
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can select multiple options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In a scientific publication |
140 |
8.0% |
0.0799086758 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005707763 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7227 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1611 |
92.0% |
0.9195205479 |
r14kma_2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report where: Have read official summary for
policymakers.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where did you hear about the report?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have read the official summary for policymakers
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can select multiple options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I have read the official summary for policymakers |
68 |
3.9% |
0.0388127854 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005707763 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7227 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1683 |
96.1% |
0.9606164384 |
r14kma_2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report where: Have read parts of the report.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where did you hear about the report?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have read parts of the report
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can select multiple options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I have read parts of the report |
114 |
6.5% |
0.0650684932 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005707763 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7227 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1637 |
93.4% |
0.9343607306 |
r14kma_2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report where: Have read report in full.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where did you hear about the report?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have read the report in full
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can select multiple options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I have read the report in full |
4 |
0.2% |
0.0022831050 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005707763 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7227 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1747 |
99.7% |
0.9971461187 |
r14pkkm42
|
Variable label:
|
All new cars sold from 2025 should/should not be electric.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private
vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from
2025.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run
on hydrogen |
3358 |
37.4% |
0.37398374 |
| 2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol. |
5511 |
61.4% |
0.61376545 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
110 |
1.2% |
0.01225081 |
r14pkkm4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Should not allow oil and gas extraction in Lofoten,
Vesterålen and Senja.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree
with this?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen
and Senja areas.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2870 |
32.0% |
0.319634703 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1600 |
17.8% |
0.178193563 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1045 |
11.6% |
0.116382671 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1286 |
14.3% |
0.143223076 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
799 |
8.9% |
0.088985410 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
811 |
9.0% |
0.090321862 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
501 |
5.6% |
0.055796859 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.7% |
0.007461855 |
r14pkkm2
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all concerned |
313 |
3.5% |
0.034859116 |
| 2 |
Not very conceerned |
1162 |
12.9% |
0.129413075 |
| 3 |
Slightly concerned |
2687 |
29.9% |
0.299253814 |
| 4 |
Very concerned |
2984 |
33.2% |
0.332330995 |
| 5 |
Extremely concerned |
1780 |
19.8% |
0.198240339 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
53 |
0.6% |
0.005902662 |
r14pk_vekst
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of
industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of
industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
153 |
2.2% |
0.022036584 |
| 2 |
Agree |
500 |
7.2% |
0.072014979 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1308 |
18.8% |
0.188391185 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
867 |
12.5% |
0.124873974 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1627 |
23.4% |
0.234336742 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1641 |
23.6% |
0.236353161 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
802 |
11.6% |
0.115512027 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
0.6% |
0.006481348 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2036 |
|
NA |
r14pkmeme9
|
Variable label:
|
Should be easier/harder for refugees to be granted residence in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and
their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is
today, do you mean it should be:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much easier |
215 |
2.4% |
0.023944760 |
| 2 |
Easier |
859 |
9.6% |
0.095667669 |
| 3 |
Somewhat easier |
1620 |
18.0% |
0.180420982 |
| 4 |
Same as today |
3200 |
35.6% |
0.356387126 |
| 5 |
Slightly more difficult |
1383 |
15.4% |
0.154026061 |
| 6 |
More difficult |
884 |
9.8% |
0.098451943 |
| 7 |
Much more difficult |
734 |
8.2% |
0.081746297 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
84 |
0.9% |
0.009355162 |
r14pkdv5
|
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to
live here.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very great advantage |
204 |
2.3% |
0.022719679 |
| 2 |
Great advantage |
1158 |
12.9% |
0.128967591 |
| 3 |
Slightly advantageous |
3193 |
35.6% |
0.355607529 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1655 |
18.4% |
0.184318966 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1740 |
19.4% |
0.193785499 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
588 |
6.5% |
0.065486134 |
| 7 |
Very great disadvantage |
352 |
3.9% |
0.039202584 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
1.0% |
0.009912017 |
r14pk101
|
Variable label:
|
How goood or poor are preconditions for integrating refugees in
Norwegian society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian
society for integrating refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
387 |
4.3% |
0.04310057 |
| 2 |
Good |
2341 |
26.1% |
0.26071946 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
2001 |
22.3% |
0.22285332 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
1061 |
11.8% |
0.11816461 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poor |
1733 |
19.3% |
0.19300590 |
| 6 |
Poor |
1047 |
11.7% |
0.11660541 |
| 7 |
Very poor |
282 |
3.1% |
0.03140662 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
127 |
1.4% |
0.01414411 |
r14pk10
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? Do
you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
2115 |
23.6% |
0.235549616 |
| 2 |
Good |
4852 |
54.0% |
0.540371979 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
1237 |
13.8% |
0.137765898 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
354 |
3.9% |
0.039425326 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
249 |
2.8% |
0.027731373 |
| 6 |
Bad |
71 |
0.8% |
0.007907339 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
21 |
0.2% |
0.002338791 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
80 |
0.9% |
0.008909678 |
r14pk100
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The people should be conferred by referendums if
municipalities are merged in future.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
When municipalities are to be merged in the future, the public shuld be
allowed to have their say on the matter through referendums.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2369 |
26.4% |
0.26383784 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2443 |
27.2% |
0.27207930 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1416 |
15.8% |
0.15770130 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
796 |
8.9% |
0.08865130 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
703 |
7.8% |
0.07829380 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
876 |
9.8% |
0.09756098 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
285 |
3.2% |
0.03174073 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
91 |
1.0% |
0.01013476 |
r14pk_sentral
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Government show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1471 |
21.2% |
0.211868069 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1758 |
25.3% |
0.253204667 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1530 |
22.0% |
0.220365836 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
958 |
13.8% |
0.137980700 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
450 |
6.5% |
0.064813481 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
562 |
8.1% |
0.080944837 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
150 |
2.2% |
0.021604494 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
0.9% |
0.009217917 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2036 |
|
NA |
r14pk60
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Government should work more to reduce income differences
in society.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income
differences in society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2634 |
29.3% |
0.29335115 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2565 |
28.6% |
0.28566656 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1738 |
19.4% |
0.19356276 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
883 |
9.8% |
0.09834057 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
559 |
6.2% |
0.06225638 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
392 |
4.4% |
0.04365742 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
101 |
1.1% |
0.01124847 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
107 |
1.2% |
0.01191669 |
r14pk29
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2029 |
22.6% |
0.22597171 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1961 |
21.8% |
0.21839849 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1442 |
16.1% |
0.16059695 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1293 |
14.4% |
0.14400267 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
783 |
8.7% |
0.08720347 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
971 |
10.8% |
0.10814122 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
397 |
4.4% |
0.04421428 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
103 |
1.1% |
0.01147121 |
r14pkdv55
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Should be able to send children to muslim schools which
follow national curriculum and teach Islam.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian
schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the
Christian faith.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents
to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national
curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
282 |
3.1% |
0.03140662 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1022 |
11.4% |
0.11382114 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1100 |
12.3% |
0.12250807 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1380 |
15.4% |
0.15369195 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1085 |
12.1% |
0.12083751 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1759 |
19.6% |
0.19590155 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
2244 |
25.0% |
0.24991647 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
107 |
1.2% |
0.01191669 |
r14pk_guns
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Norwegian police should be armed.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norwegian police should be
armed?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1069 |
11.9% |
0.11905557 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1769 |
19.7% |
0.19701526 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2129 |
23.7% |
0.23710881 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
870 |
9.7% |
0.09689275 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1040 |
11.6% |
0.11582582 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1195 |
13.3% |
0.13308832 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
805 |
9.0% |
0.08965364 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
102 |
1.1% |
0.01135984 |
r14pkby3
|
Variable label:
|
How afraid of a new terrorist attack in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
443 |
4.9% |
0.04933734 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
1393 |
15.5% |
0.15513977 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
3929 |
43.8% |
0.43757657 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
2701 |
30.1% |
0.30081301 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
412 |
4.6% |
0.04588484 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
101 |
1.1% |
0.01124847 |
r14pk52
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Authorities should introduce measures to protect from
terrorism even at the expense of privacy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from
potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of
privacy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
875 |
9.7% |
0.09744960 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2109 |
23.5% |
0.23488139 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2506 |
27.9% |
0.27909567 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1062 |
11.8% |
0.11827598 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
986 |
11.0% |
0.10981178 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
939 |
10.5% |
0.10457735 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
399 |
4.4% |
0.04443702 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
103 |
1.1% |
0.01147121 |
r14pad1_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r14group = 2. The respondent is shown a randomly selected
vignette.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vignette 1 Read the text below, and click or tap “next”. In recent
years, there have been several terrorist attacks, including in Norway.
Norwegian authorities consider terror to be one of the main threats to
Norwegian society.
Vignette 2 Read the text below, and click or tap “next”. In recent
years, there have been several terrorist attacks, including in Norway.
Norwegian authorities consider terror to be one of the main threats to
Norwegian society, and have for several years worked systematically to
build capacity for preventing terrorism and terrorist incidents, and the
ability to manage in the event of a terrorist incident and its
aftermath. Several public reports and sources point to the fact that the
government’s capacity and readiness has increased in several areas.
Vignette 3 Read the text below, and click or tap “next”. In recent
years, there have been several terrorist attacks, including in Norway.
Norwegian authorities consider terror to be one of the main threats to
Norwegian society, and have for several years worked systematically to
build capacity for preventing terrorism and terrorist incidents, and the
ability to manage in the event of a terrorist incident and its
aftermath. Several public reports and sources point to the fact that the
government’s capacity (and readiness) is still inadequate.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r14group = 2. The respondent is shown a randomly selected
vignette.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2287] [Invalid:6692]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Vignette 1 |
738 |
32.3% |
0.3226935 |
| 2 |
Vignette 2 |
746 |
32.6% |
0.3261915 |
| 3 |
Vignette 3 |
803 |
35.1% |
0.3511150 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6692 |
|
NA |
r14pad2
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of confidence in Stortinget (Parliament).
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Randomly chosen vignette. See r14pad1_ran]]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Storting (Parliament)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2. The order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4 is
randomized. See r14pad_order. The respondent was shown a randomly
selected vignette before r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. See r14pad1_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
70 |
3.0% |
0.03034244 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
965 |
41.8% |
0.41829215 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
965 |
41.8% |
0.41829215 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
250 |
10.8% |
0.10836584 |
| 5 |
No confidence |
28 |
1.2% |
0.01213697 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.3% |
0.01257044 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6672 |
|
NA |
r14pad3
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of confidence in the Government.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Randomly chosen vignette. See r14pad1_ran]]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Government?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2. The order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4 is
randomized. See r14pad_order. The respondent was shown a randomly
selected vignette before r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. See r14pad1_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
46 |
2.0% |
0.01993932 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
699 |
30.3% |
0.30299090 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
1003 |
43.5% |
0.43476376 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
453 |
19.6% |
0.19635891 |
| 5 |
No confidence |
78 |
3.4% |
0.03381014 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.01213697 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6672 |
|
NA |
r14pad4
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of confidence in the police.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Randomly chosen vignette. See r14pad1_ran]]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the police?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2. The order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4 is
randomized. See r14pad_order. The respondent was shown a randomly
selected vignette before r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. See r14pad1_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
188 |
8.1% |
0.081491114 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
1324 |
57.4% |
0.573905505 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
641 |
27.8% |
0.277850022 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
105 |
4.6% |
0.045513654 |
| 5 |
No confidence |
21 |
0.9% |
0.009102731 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.012136974 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6672 |
|
NA |
r14pad_order
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable. Specifies the order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and
r14pad4. The order is randomized]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies the order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and
r14pad4. The order is randomized.
1 = r14pad2 2 = r14pad3 3 = r14pad4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14pad5
|
Variable label:
|
What capacity do Norwegian authorities have toward preventing and
managing terrorist incidents and their aftermath.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What capacity do you think the Norwegian authorities have when it comes
to preventing terrorism and terrorist incidents, and managing terrorists
incidents and their aftermath?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very large capacity |
20 |
0.9% |
0.008669267 |
| 2 |
A large capacity |
474 |
20.5% |
0.205461638 |
| 3 |
Some capacity |
1292 |
56.0% |
0.560034677 |
| 4 |
Small capacity |
480 |
20.8% |
0.208062419 |
| 5 |
No capacity |
13 |
0.6% |
0.005635024 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.012136974 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6672 |
|
NA |
r14pkklasse
|
Variable label:
|
To which social class do you belong.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups
or classes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it
be?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lower class |
27 |
1.3% |
0.013261297 |
| 2 |
Working class |
322 |
15.8% |
0.158153242 |
| 3 |
Lower middle class |
220 |
10.8% |
0.108055010 |
| 4 |
Middle class |
1041 |
51.1% |
0.511296660 |
| 5 |
Upper middle class |
303 |
14.9% |
0.148821218 |
| 6 |
Upper class |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003438114 |
| 7 |
Don't know |
79 |
3.9% |
0.038801572 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
1.8% |
0.018172888 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bk33
|
Variable label:
|
Main occupation last seven days.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
4195 |
46.7% |
0.4672012474 |
| 2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
383 |
4.3% |
0.0426550841 |
| 3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
319 |
3.6% |
0.0355273416 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
424 |
4.7% |
0.0472212941 |
| 5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
407 |
4.5% |
0.0453279875 |
| 6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
81 |
0.9% |
0.0090210491 |
| 7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
27 |
0.3% |
0.0030070164 |
| 8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
437 |
4.9% |
0.0486691168 |
| 9 |
Retired |
2308 |
25.7% |
0.2570442143 |
| 10 |
In military service |
6 |
0.1% |
0.0006682259 |
| 11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
56 |
0.6% |
0.0062367747 |
| 12 |
Other: |
240 |
2.7% |
0.0267290344 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
96 |
1.1% |
0.0106916138 |
r14bk33_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R14BK33]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14bk33_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Main occupation last seven days. [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
[This variable contains the values of r14bk33 plus coded values of
r14bk33_12_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
4225 |
47.1% |
0.4705423767 |
| 2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
391 |
4.4% |
0.0435460519 |
| 3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
339 |
3.8% |
0.0377547611 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
429 |
4.8% |
0.0477781490 |
| 5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
431 |
4.8% |
0.0480008910 |
| 6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
82 |
0.9% |
0.0091324201 |
| 7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
27 |
0.3% |
0.0030070164 |
| 8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
454 |
5.1% |
0.0505624234 |
| 9 |
Retired |
2342 |
26.1% |
0.2608308275 |
| 10 |
In military service |
7 |
0.1% |
0.0007795968 |
| 11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
58 |
0.6% |
0.0064595166 |
| 12 |
Other: |
99 |
1.1% |
0.0110257267 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
95 |
1.1% |
0.0105802428 |
r14bk21
|
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14bk33 = 1 or 2 or 3 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
566 |
11.6% |
0.115580968 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1570 |
32.1% |
0.320604452 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
332 |
6.8% |
0.067796610 |
| 4 |
Private business |
2262 |
46.2% |
0.461915458 |
| 5 |
Self-employed |
24 |
0.5% |
0.004900960 |
| 6 |
Other: |
136 |
2.8% |
0.027772105 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001429447 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4082 |
|
NA |
r14bk21_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R14BK21]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14bk21_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in. [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14bk33 = 1 or 2 or 3 ]
[This variable contains the values of r14bk21 plus coded values of
r14bk21_6_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
568 |
11.6% |
0.115989381 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1579 |
32.2% |
0.322442312 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
345 |
7.0% |
0.070451297 |
| 4 |
Private business |
2275 |
46.5% |
0.464570145 |
| 5 |
Self-employed |
29 |
0.6% |
0.005921993 |
| 6 |
Other: |
94 |
1.9% |
0.019195426 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001429447 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4082 |
|
NA |
r14bk26
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004911591 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or
lower secondary school) |
123 |
6.0% |
0.060412574 |
| 3 |
Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School, business college) |
254 |
12.5% |
0.124754420 |
| 4 |
Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2,
VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) |
289 |
14.2% |
0.141944990 |
| 5 |
Craft training/shorter education programmes (e.g. vocational school, technical
school/college, maritime vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot
training, secretary school, home industry school/handicrafts school, master
craftsman certificate |
175 |
8.6% |
0.085952849 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university
college graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
156 |
7.7% |
0.076620825 |
| 7 |
College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime
subjects, military subjects etc.) |
376 |
18.5% |
0.184675835 |
| 8 |
University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) |
131 |
6.4% |
0.064341847 |
| 9 |
University college – 5-6 year education (MA, hovedfag or longer vocational
education on a university college level) |
119 |
5.8% |
0.058447937 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered
engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) |
286 |
14.0% |
0.140471513 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
39 |
1.9% |
0.019155206 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
40 |
2.0% |
0.019646365 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
1.9% |
0.018664047 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bk26_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R14BK26]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14bk26_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education. [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
[This variable contains the values of r14bk26 plus coded values of
r14bk26_12_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004911591 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or
lower secondary school) |
125 |
6.1% |
0.061394892 |
| 3 |
Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School, business college) |
259 |
12.7% |
0.127210216 |
| 4 |
Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2,
VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) |
292 |
14.3% |
0.143418468 |
| 5 |
Craft training/shorter education programmes (e.g. vocational school, technical
school/college, maritime vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot
training, secretary school, home industry school/handicrafts school, master
craftsman certificate |
178 |
8.7% |
0.087426326 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university
college graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
158 |
7.8% |
0.077603143 |
| 7 |
College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime
subjects, military subjects etc.) |
379 |
18.6% |
0.186149312 |
| 8 |
University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) |
138 |
6.8% |
0.067779961 |
| 9 |
University college – 5-6 year education (MA, hovedfag or longer vocational
education on a university college level) |
119 |
5.8% |
0.058447937 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered
engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) |
288 |
14.1% |
0.141453831 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
39 |
1.9% |
0.019155206 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006385069 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
1.9% |
0.018664047 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bkhelse
|
Variable label:
|
How is your health.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
1425 |
15.9% |
0.15870364 |
| 2 |
Very good |
3306 |
36.8% |
0.36819245 |
| 3 |
Good |
2912 |
32.4% |
0.32431228 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
948 |
10.6% |
0.10557969 |
| 5 |
Poor |
294 |
3.3% |
0.03274307 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
94 |
1.0% |
0.01046887 |
r14bk25
|
Variable label:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
<150 000 |
584 |
6.5% |
0.06504065 |
| 2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
1149 |
12.8% |
0.12796525 |
| 3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
1376 |
15.3% |
0.15324646 |
| 4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1603 |
17.9% |
0.17852768 |
| 5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
1463 |
16.3% |
0.16293574 |
| 6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
962 |
10.7% |
0.10713888 |
| 7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
1108 |
12.3% |
0.12339904 |
| 8 |
>1 000 000 |
495 |
5.5% |
0.05512863 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
239 |
2.7% |
0.02661766 |
r14bk27
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
1178 |
13.1% |
0.131195011 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
520 |
5.8% |
0.057912908 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
1510 |
16.8% |
0.168170175 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
4911 |
54.7% |
0.546942867 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
465 |
5.2% |
0.051787504 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
268 |
3.0% |
0.029847422 |
| 7 |
Other: |
23 |
0.3% |
0.002561532 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
104 |
1.2% |
0.011582582 |
r14bk27_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R14BK27]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14bk27_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status. [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[This variable contains the values of r14bk27 plus coded values of
r14bk27_7_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
1183 |
13.2% |
0.1317518655 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
522 |
5.8% |
0.0581356498 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
1512 |
16.8% |
0.1683929168 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
4917 |
54.8% |
0.5476110925 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
465 |
5.2% |
0.0517875042 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
268 |
3.0% |
0.0298474218 |
| 7 |
Other: |
8 |
0.1% |
0.0008909678 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
104 |
1.2% |
0.0115825816 |
r14bk40
|
Variable label:
|
Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:8979]
[Range:-]
|
r14bk40_recode
|
Variable label:
|
Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
[Recoded from source variable r14bk40]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
1199 |
58.9% |
0.588899804 |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
41 |
2.0% |
0.020137525 |
| 3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
92 |
4.5% |
0.045186640 |
| 4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008840864 |
| 5 |
Islam |
33 |
1.6% |
0.016208251 |
| 6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
610 |
30.0% |
0.299607073 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
2.1% |
0.021119843 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bk41
|
Variable label:
|
How often attend religious meetings, aside from special occasions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often
would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001964637 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
23 |
1.1% |
0.011296660 |
| 3 |
Once a week |
67 |
3.3% |
0.032907662 |
| 4 |
At least once a month |
105 |
5.2% |
0.051571709 |
| 5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
343 |
16.8% |
0.168467583 |
| 6 |
Less frequently |
452 |
22.2% |
0.222003929 |
| 7 |
Never |
1000 |
49.1% |
0.491159136 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2.1% |
0.020628684 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bk28
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1862 |
91.5% |
0.91453831 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
135 |
6.6% |
0.06630648 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
39 |
1.9% |
0.01915521 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bk28_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R14BK28]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14bk29
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or any of your parents immigrated to Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
1755 |
86.2% |
0.861984283 |
| 2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
133 |
6.5% |
0.065324165 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009332024 |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
53 |
2.6% |
0.026031434 |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
32 |
1.6% |
0.015717092 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.2% |
0.021611002 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bk30
|
Variable label:
|
In which country did you live before you immigrated. [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did you live in before you immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 and r14bk29 = 2][Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14bk30_1_1
|
Variable label:
|
In which country did your parents live before they immigrated: Mother.
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both) live in before
they immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 and r14bk29 = 3][Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14bk30_1_2
|
Variable label:
|
In which country did your parents live before they immigrated: Father.
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both) live in before
they immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 and r14bk29 = 3][Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14bk30_2
|
Variable label:
|
In which country did your mother live before she immigrated. [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your mother live before she immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 and r14bk29 = 4][Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14bk30_3
|
Variable label:
|
In which country did your father live before he immigrated. [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your father live before he immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 and r14bk29 = 5][Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r14P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
4496 |
50.1% |
0.5007239 |
| 2 |
Female |
4483 |
49.9% |
0.4992761 |
r14P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The respondents were given the opportunity to update their residency
information. See Documentation Report for Round 14]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
2566 |
28.6% |
0.28577793 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
2049 |
22.8% |
0.22819913 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
468 |
5.2% |
0.05212162 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
2416 |
26.9% |
0.26907228 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
782 |
8.7% |
0.08709210 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
698 |
7.8% |
0.07773694 |
r14P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The respondents were given the opportunity to update their residency
information. See Documentation Report for Round 14]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-18]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus |
1158 |
12.9% |
0.128967591 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
1408 |
15.7% |
0.156810335 |
| 3 |
Østfold |
441 |
4.9% |
0.049114601 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
413 |
4.6% |
0.045996213 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
261 |
2.9% |
0.029067825 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
265 |
3.0% |
0.029513309 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
421 |
4.7% |
0.046887181 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
248 |
2.8% |
0.027620002 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
302 |
3.4% |
0.033634035 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
166 |
1.8% |
0.018487582 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
798 |
8.9% |
0.088874039 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
1089 |
12.1% |
0.121282994 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
162 |
1.8% |
0.018042098 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
367 |
4.1% |
0.040873148 |
| 15 |
Trøndelag |
782 |
8.7% |
0.087092104 |
| 16 |
Nordland |
341 |
3.8% |
0.037977503 |
| 17 |
Troms |
268 |
3.0% |
0.029847422 |
| 18 |
Finmark |
89 |
1.0% |
0.009912017 |
r14P_moved
|
Variable label:
|
Change of home municipality
|
|
Literal question:
|
Respondents where asked if they still live in the municipality as
upon registration for the panel. If that was not the case, they were
asked to state their home municipality.
Respondents who moved outside of Norway gets the value “1”, but they
also asked a follow-up question asking them to state their home
municipality in Norway, if they have one.
Change of home residence within the same municipality is not registered.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
No, the respondent has not changed home municipality. |
8436 |
94.0% |
0.93952556 |
| 1 |
Yes, the respondent has changed home municipality. |
543 |
6.0% |
0.06047444 |
r14P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
623 |
6.9% |
0.06938412 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
2665 |
29.7% |
0.29680365 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
5358 |
59.7% |
0.59672569 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
333 |
3.7% |
0.03708654 |
r14P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
30 |
0.3% |
0.003341129 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
593 |
6.6% |
0.066042989 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
1044 |
11.6% |
0.116271300 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1109 |
12.4% |
0.123510413 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
512 |
5.7% |
0.057021940 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
804 |
9.0% |
0.089542265 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
1864 |
20.8% |
0.207595501 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
645 |
7.2% |
0.071834280 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
552 |
6.1% |
0.061476779 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1297 |
14.4% |
0.144448157 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
196 |
2.2% |
0.021828711 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
225 |
2.5% |
0.025058470 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
108 |
1.2% |
0.012028065 |
r14P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
249 |
2.8% |
0.02773137 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
1502 |
16.7% |
0.16727921 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
2088 |
23.3% |
0.23254260 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
1875 |
20.9% |
0.20882058 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
1418 |
15.8% |
0.15792404 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
1004 |
11.2% |
0.11181646 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
843 |
9.4% |
0.09388573 |
r14P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
3839 |
42.8% |
0.42755318 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
4297 |
47.9% |
0.47856109 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
843 |
9.4% |
0.09388573 |
r14Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-3]
|
r14Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-24]
|
r14Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]
|
