Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
|
Sveinung Arnesen
|
NORCE
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Marta Eidheim
|
UiB
|
|
Yvette Peters
|
UiB
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Lund Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
|
Arjan Schakel
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in six
waves:
In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 1).
In wave 3, 5 623 members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 3).
In wave 8, 4 245 new
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8).
In wave
11, 2 069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave
11).
In wave 14, 2 036 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 14).
In wave 16, 5 163 panel members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 16).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry, while in wave 8 the
gross sample amounted to 22 000 individuals. In wave 11 and 14, a
corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. In wave 16, the
gross sample was 34 000.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d)
gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment. Please refer to the Documentation Report from Wave 16. The
report is available here:
http://digsscore.uib.no/download-data-and-documentation
In wave 17, emails were sent out on 15th of january, 2020.
E-mail with reminder was sent out three times, January 21st, January
27th and January 31st, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not
logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel
members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via
text message. Panel members without registered phone number were
reminded by e-mail.
Wave 17 ended February 22nd, 2020.
Weighting
To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated.
The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population
and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata
in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns
values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will
receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a
weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the
documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information
regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are
based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample
file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information
regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when
answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-103
|
2023-11-22
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 17
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r17Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r17Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r17Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-103
|
2023-10-25
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 17
|
|
NA
|
2022-02-10
|
r17pk_vekst
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r17pk204_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r17pk204 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r17bk26_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r17bk26 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r17bk33_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r17bk33 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r17bk21_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r17bk21 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r17pk204_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r17bk26_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r17bk33_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r17bk21_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-102
|
2021-02-12
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 17
|
|
NA
|
2021-02-11
|
r17oppvekstfylke
|
New
variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years
of age, based on registered municipality in r17oppvekstkom
|
|
NA
|
2021-02-11
|
r17oppvekstfylke
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-02-03
|
r17P3_2
|
New
variable: Constituency of parliament election 2021
|
|
NA
|
2021-02-03
|
r17P3_2
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-15
|
r17tittel
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 17
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
r17bk21_7_other
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
r17tittel
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-100
|
2020-04-02
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 17
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 17 - v-103-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
11384
|
|
# Variables
|
126
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r17rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
1677 |
14.7% |
0.14731202 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
1835 |
16.1% |
0.16119115 |
| 8 |
Wave 8 |
1818 |
16.0% |
0.15969782 |
| 11 |
Wave 11 |
1081 |
9.5% |
0.09495784 |
| 14 |
Wave 14 |
1233 |
10.8% |
0.10830991 |
| 16 |
Wave 16 |
3740 |
32.9% |
0.32853127 |
r17interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r17interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11110] [Invalid:274]
[Range:-]
|
r17browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r17browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r17mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
6728 |
59.1% |
0.5910049 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
4656 |
40.9% |
0.4089951 |
r17opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r17enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
6863 |
60.3% |
0.602863668 |
| 2 |
Touch |
4489 |
39.4% |
0.394325369 |
| 3 |
Generic |
32 |
0.3% |
0.002810963 |
r17advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r17getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r17pk15
|
Variable label:
|
Whether people in general can be trusted
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
109 |
1.0% |
0.009574842 |
| 1 |
1 |
62 |
0.5% |
0.005446240 |
| 2 |
2 |
181 |
1.6% |
0.015899508 |
| 3 |
3 |
366 |
3.2% |
0.032150387 |
| 4 |
4 |
418 |
3.7% |
0.036718201 |
| 5 |
5 |
1120 |
9.8% |
0.098383696 |
| 6 |
6 |
1070 |
9.4% |
0.093991567 |
| 7 |
7 |
2569 |
22.6% |
0.225667604 |
| 8 |
8 |
2966 |
26.1% |
0.260541110 |
| 9 |
9 |
1179 |
10.4% |
0.103566409 |
| 10 |
10 - Most people can be trusted |
1320 |
11.6% |
0.115952214 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.2% |
0.002108222 |
r17pktilfreds1
|
Variable label:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
3439 |
30.2% |
0.302090654 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
6273 |
55.1% |
0.551036543 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1333 |
11.7% |
0.117094167 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
264 |
2.3% |
0.023190443 |
| 5 |
Very dissatisfied |
39 |
0.3% |
0.003425861 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
0.3% |
0.003162333 |
r17pk9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The most important political issues for you personally (1) [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
[Text data will not be distributed due
to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11384]
[Range:-]
|
r17pk9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The most important political issues for you personally (2) [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
[Text data will not be distributed due
to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11384]
[Range:-]
|
r17pk9_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The most important political issues for you personally (3) [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
[Text data will not be distributed due
to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11384]
[Range:-]
|
r17pk10
|
Variable label:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
3133 |
27.5% |
0.275210822 |
| 2 |
Good |
5816 |
51.1% |
0.510892481 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
1424 |
12.5% |
0.125087843 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
512 |
4.5% |
0.044975404 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
303 |
2.7% |
0.026616304 |
| 6 |
Bad |
118 |
1.0% |
0.010365425 |
| 7 |
Very Bad |
45 |
0.4% |
0.003952916 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.3% |
0.002898805 |
r17tdr17
|
Variable label:
|
The economic situation in your region of the country compared to the
rest of Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation [in your region of the country]
with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation [in your region
of the country] as better, worse or the same?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Better |
3331 |
29.3% |
0.2926037 |
| 2 |
Worse |
1605 |
14.1% |
0.1409874 |
| 3 |
The same |
6333 |
55.6% |
0.5563071 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
115 |
1.0% |
0.0101019 |
r17pktilfreds4
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
1164 |
10.2% |
0.10224877 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
5828 |
51.2% |
0.51194659 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2999 |
26.3% |
0.26343992 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
1089 |
9.6% |
0.09566058 |
| 5 |
Very dissatisfied |
246 |
2.2% |
0.02160928 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
0.5% |
0.00509487 |
r17pktilfreds3
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
245 |
2.2% |
0.02152143 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2443 |
21.5% |
0.21459944 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
3633 |
31.9% |
0.31913212 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
3357 |
29.5% |
0.29488756 |
| 5 |
Very dissatisfied |
1583 |
13.9% |
0.13905481 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
123 |
1.1% |
0.01080464 |
r17pk204
|
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
351 |
3.1% |
0.030832748 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2134 |
18.7% |
0.187456079 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
957 |
8.4% |
0.084065355 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
340 |
3.0% |
0.029866479 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1053 |
9.2% |
0.092498243 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1712 |
15.0% |
0.150386507 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
852 |
7.5% |
0.074841883 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2286 |
20.1% |
0.200808152 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
627 |
5.5% |
0.055077301 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
203 |
1.8% |
0.017832045 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
307 |
2.7% |
0.026967674 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
194 |
1.7% |
0.017041462 |
| 13 |
Other: |
287 |
2.5% |
0.025210822 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
0.7% |
0.007115249 |
r17pk204_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondentene spurt.]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
352 |
3.1% |
0.030920590 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2134 |
18.7% |
0.187456079 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
958 |
8.4% |
0.084153197 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
340 |
3.0% |
0.029866479 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1053 |
9.2% |
0.092498243 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1712 |
15.0% |
0.150386507 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
852 |
7.5% |
0.074841883 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2286 |
20.1% |
0.200808152 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
627 |
5.5% |
0.055077301 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
203 |
1.8% |
0.017832045 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
307 |
2.7% |
0.026967674 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
194 |
1.7% |
0.017041462 |
| 13 |
Other: |
285 |
2.5% |
0.025035137 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
0.7% |
0.007115249 |
r17pk204_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary
election tomorrow? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
[Text data will not be distributed due
to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11384]
[Range:-]
|
r17pk6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1947 |
17.1% |
0.17102952 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
2397 |
21.1% |
0.21055868 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2738 |
24.1% |
0.24051300 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2098 |
18.4% |
0.18429375 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1500 |
13.2% |
0.13176388 |
| 6 |
Really like |
422 |
3.7% |
0.03706957 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
115 |
1.0% |
0.01010190 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
167 |
1.5% |
0.01466971 |
r17pk6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
680 |
6.0% |
0.05973296 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1659 |
14.6% |
0.14573085 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2301 |
20.2% |
0.20212579 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1482 |
13.0% |
0.13018271 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2683 |
23.6% |
0.23568166 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1964 |
17.3% |
0.17252284 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
443 |
3.9% |
0.03891427 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
172 |
1.5% |
0.01510892 |
r17pk6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
3800 |
33.4% |
0.33380183 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
2074 |
18.2% |
0.18218552 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1588 |
13.9% |
0.13949403 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
995 |
8.7% |
0.08740337 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1584 |
13.9% |
0.13914266 |
| 6 |
Really like |
870 |
7.6% |
0.07642305 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
308 |
2.7% |
0.02705552 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
165 |
1.4% |
0.01449403 |
r17pk6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1425 |
12.5% |
0.125175685 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1845 |
16.2% |
0.162069571 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2460 |
21.6% |
0.216092762 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2704 |
23.8% |
0.237526353 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2082 |
18.3% |
0.182888264 |
| 6 |
Really like |
585 |
5.1% |
0.051387913 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
93 |
0.8% |
0.008169361 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
190 |
1.7% |
0.016690091 |
r17pk6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1450 |
12.7% |
0.12737175 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1760 |
15.5% |
0.15460295 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1714 |
15.1% |
0.15056219 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2021 |
17.8% |
0.17752987 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2197 |
19.3% |
0.19299016 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1548 |
13.6% |
0.13598032 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
504 |
4.4% |
0.04427266 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
190 |
1.7% |
0.01669009 |
r17pk6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
503 |
4.4% |
0.04418482 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
998 |
8.8% |
0.08766690 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1786 |
15.7% |
0.15688686 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2551 |
22.4% |
0.22408644 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
3138 |
27.6% |
0.27565004 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1754 |
15.4% |
0.15407590 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
466 |
4.1% |
0.04093465 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
188 |
1.7% |
0.01651441 |
r17pk6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2064 |
18.1% |
0.18130710 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1579 |
13.9% |
0.13870344 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1696 |
14.9% |
0.14898103 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1580 |
13.9% |
0.13879129 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2457 |
21.6% |
0.21582923 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1412 |
12.4% |
0.12403373 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
439 |
3.9% |
0.03856290 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
157 |
1.4% |
0.01379129 |
r17pk6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
497 |
4.4% |
0.04365777 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
905 |
7.9% |
0.07949754 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1900 |
16.7% |
0.16690091 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1789 |
15.7% |
0.15715039 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
3433 |
30.2% |
0.30156360 |
| 6 |
Really like |
2231 |
19.6% |
0.19597681 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
456 |
4.0% |
0.04005622 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
173 |
1.5% |
0.01519677 |
r17pk6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2349 |
20.6% |
0.20634223 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1708 |
15.0% |
0.15003514 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1576 |
13.8% |
0.13843992 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1971 |
17.3% |
0.17313774 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2123 |
18.6% |
0.18648981 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1054 |
9.3% |
0.09258609 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
404 |
3.5% |
0.03548840 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
199 |
1.7% |
0.01748067 |
r17pkdv5
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very great advantage |
459 |
4.0% |
0.040319747 |
| 2 |
Great advantage |
2057 |
18.1% |
0.180692200 |
| 3 |
Slightly advantageous |
4347 |
38.2% |
0.381851722 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1661 |
14.6% |
0.145906535 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1782 |
15.7% |
0.156535488 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
629 |
5.5% |
0.055252987 |
| 7 |
Very great disadvantage |
403 |
3.5% |
0.035400562 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
0.4% |
0.004040759 |
r17pkmeme9
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion on refugees’ opportunity to be granted residence in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and
their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is
today, do you mean it should be:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much easier |
301 |
2.6% |
0.026440618 |
| 2 |
Easier |
1320 |
11.6% |
0.115952214 |
| 3 |
Somewhat easier |
2499 |
22.0% |
0.219518623 |
| 4 |
Same as today |
3897 |
34.2% |
0.342322558 |
| 5 |
Slightly more difficult |
1589 |
14.0% |
0.139581869 |
| 6 |
More difficult |
870 |
7.6% |
0.076423050 |
| 7 |
Much more difficult |
825 |
7.2% |
0.072470134 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
0.7% |
0.007290935 |
r17pk101
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion on Norway’s preconditions for integrating refugees
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian
society for integrating refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
736 |
6.5% |
0.064652143 |
| 2 |
Good |
3104 |
27.3% |
0.272663387 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
2480 |
21.8% |
0.217849613 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
1343 |
11.8% |
0.117972593 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poor |
2091 |
18.4% |
0.183678848 |
| 6 |
Poor |
1145 |
10.1% |
0.100579761 |
| 7 |
Very poor |
391 |
3.4% |
0.034346451 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
94 |
0.8% |
0.008257203 |
r17pk12
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
575 |
5.1% |
0.050509487 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
4799 |
42.2% |
0.421556571 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
4483 |
39.4% |
0.393798313 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
1226 |
10.8% |
0.107695011 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
254 |
2.2% |
0.022312017 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
47 |
0.4% |
0.004128602 |
r17pk53
|
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
128 |
1.1% |
0.01124385 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
2957 |
26.0% |
0.25975053 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
5837 |
51.3% |
0.51273717 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
2002 |
17.6% |
0.17586086 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
371 |
3.3% |
0.03258960 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
0.8% |
0.00781799 |
r17pk54
|
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, what degree of confidence do you have in the
Norwegian news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, what degree of confidence do you have in the
Norwegian news media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
429 |
3.8% |
0.037684469 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
4123 |
36.2% |
0.362174982 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
5106 |
44.9% |
0.448524245 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
1281 |
11.3% |
0.112526353 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
353 |
3.1% |
0.031008433 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
92 |
0.8% |
0.008081518 |
r17pk_sentral
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Government authorities show little consideration for
non-urban/rural Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2399 |
21.1% |
0.21073436 |
| 2 |
Agree |
3189 |
28.0% |
0.28013001 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
3023 |
26.6% |
0.26554814 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1338 |
11.8% |
0.11753338 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
681 |
6.0% |
0.05982080 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
567 |
5.0% |
0.04980675 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
133 |
1.2% |
0.01168306 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
0.5% |
0.00474350 |
r17pk55
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: The number of municipalities should be reduced further
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway now has 356 municipalities instead of 422 as before. The number
of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
983 |
8.6% |
0.086349262 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1706 |
15.0% |
0.149859452 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1776 |
15.6% |
0.156008433 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
2164 |
19.0% |
0.190091356 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1301 |
11.4% |
0.114283204 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1959 |
17.2% |
0.172083626 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1418 |
12.5% |
0.124560787 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
77 |
0.7% |
0.006763879 |
r17pkdv55
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: It should be possible for parents to send their children to
Muslim schools
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian
schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the
Christian faith.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents
to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national
curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
213 |
1.9% |
0.018710471 |
| 2 |
Agree |
887 |
7.8% |
0.077916374 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1166 |
10.2% |
0.102424455 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1340 |
11.8% |
0.117709065 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1135 |
10.0% |
0.099701335 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1626 |
14.3% |
0.142832045 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1896 |
16.7% |
0.166549543 |
| 8 |
Neither of these should be possible |
3048 |
26.8% |
0.267744202 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
73 |
0.6% |
0.006412509 |
r17pk60
|
Variable label:
|
Proposition: The Government should work more to significantly reduce
income differences
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income
differences in society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3512 |
30.9% |
0.308503162 |
| 2 |
Agree |
3345 |
29.4% |
0.293833450 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2249 |
19.8% |
0.197557976 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
990 |
8.7% |
0.086964160 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
622 |
5.5% |
0.054638089 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
444 |
3.9% |
0.039002108 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
152 |
1.3% |
0.013352073 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
70 |
0.6% |
0.006148981 |
r17pkmeme21
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual
attention
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own
responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
182 |
1.6% |
0.015987351 |
| 2 |
Agree |
490 |
4.3% |
0.043042867 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1548 |
13.6% |
0.135980323 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1065 |
9.4% |
0.093552354 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1335 |
11.7% |
0.117269852 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
3209 |
28.2% |
0.281886859 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3472 |
30.5% |
0.304989459 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
0.7% |
0.007290935 |
r17pk103
|
Variable label:
|
How much of an advantage or disadvantage would you say the EEA Agreement
represents for Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much of an advantage or disadvantage would you say the EEA Agreement
represents for Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
950 |
8.3% |
0.08345046 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
2713 |
23.8% |
0.23831694 |
| 3 |
An advantage to some extent |
3554 |
31.2% |
0.31219255 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1522 |
13.4% |
0.13369642 |
| 5 |
A disadvantage to some extent |
1426 |
12.5% |
0.12526353 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
670 |
5.9% |
0.05885453 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
373 |
3.3% |
0.03276528 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
176 |
1.5% |
0.01546030 |
r17skepsis_qtext
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly decides question text of r17skepsis]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly decides question text of r17skepsis]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11329] [Invalid:55]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your
view on climate change? |
5708 |
50.4% |
0.5038397 |
| 2 |
You may have heard that the global climate is changing due to the increase
in temperature over the last 100 years. Based on what you know, which of the
following assertions best describes your view on climate change? |
5621 |
49.6% |
0.4961603 |
| Sysmiss |
|
55 |
|
NA |
r17skepsis
|
Variable label:
|
Your view on climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
[Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best
describes your view on climate change?/ You may have heard that the
global climate is changing due to the increase in temperature over the
last 100 years. Based on what you know, which of the following
assertions best describes your view on climate change?]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. The wording depends on r17skepsis_qtext.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I don’t believe that the climate is changing |
74 |
0.7% |
0.006500351 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not |
529 |
4.6% |
0.046468728 |
| 3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent
due to human action |
2634 |
23.1% |
0.231377372 |
| 4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to
human action |
8027 |
70.5% |
0.705112439 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
120 |
1.1% |
0.010541110 |
r17pkkm2
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all concerned |
539 |
4.7% |
0.047347154 |
| 2 |
Not very concerned |
1554 |
13.7% |
0.136507379 |
| 3 |
Slightly concerned |
3342 |
29.4% |
0.293569923 |
| 4 |
Very concerned |
3666 |
32.2% |
0.322030921 |
| 5 |
Extremely concerned |
2209 |
19.4% |
0.194044273 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
0.7% |
0.006500351 |
r17pkkm42_ask
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r17rekruttert !=16 and chooses randomly if r17pkkm42 is
asked or not. =1 if r17rekruttert = 16. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r17rekruttert !=16 and chooses randomly if r17pkkm42 is
asked or not. =1 if r17rekruttert = 16. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11324] [Invalid:60]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Respondent not asked r17pkKM42 |
3780 |
33.4% |
0.3338043 |
| 1 |
Respondent asked r17pkKM42 |
7544 |
66.6% |
0.6661957 |
| Sysmiss |
|
60 |
|
NA |
r17pkkm42
|
Variable label:
|
Proposal: From 2025, all new private vehicles should be either electric
or run on hydrogen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private
vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from
2025.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17pkKM42_ask = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run
on hydrogen |
2569 |
34.1% |
0.340535525 |
| 2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol. |
4907 |
65.0% |
0.650450689 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
68 |
0.9% |
0.009013786 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3840 |
|
NA |
r17pkkm4_ask
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r17rekruttert !=16 and chooses randomly if r17pkkm4 is
asked or not. =1 if r17rekruttert = 16. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r17rekruttert !=16 and chooses randomly if r17pkkm4 is
asked or not. =1 if r17rekruttert = 16. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11323] [Invalid:61]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Respondent not asked r17pkKM4 |
3776 |
33.3% |
0.3334805 |
| 1 |
Respondent asked r17pkKM4 |
7547 |
66.7% |
0.6665195 |
| Sysmiss |
|
61 |
|
NA |
r17pkkm4
|
Variable label:
|
Whether we should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten,
Vesterålen and Senja areas
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree
with this?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen
and Senja areas.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17pkKM4_ask = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2380 |
31.5% |
0.315357096 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1276 |
16.9% |
0.169073804 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
850 |
11.3% |
0.112627534 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1041 |
13.8% |
0.137935604 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
710 |
9.4% |
0.094077117 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
747 |
9.9% |
0.098979727 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
522 |
6.9% |
0.069166556 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.3% |
0.002782563 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3837 |
|
NA |
r17pk_vekst
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of
industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of
industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
423 |
3.7% |
0.037157414 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1082 |
9.5% |
0.095045678 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2291 |
20.1% |
0.201247365 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1393 |
12.2% |
0.122364722 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
2601 |
22.8% |
0.228478566 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2219 |
19.5% |
0.194922699 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1266 |
11.1% |
0.111208714 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
109 |
1.0% |
0.009574842 |
r17pkby3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
566 |
5.0% |
0.049718904 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
1796 |
15.8% |
0.157765285 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
4977 |
43.7% |
0.437192551 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
3508 |
30.8% |
0.308151792 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
461 |
4.0% |
0.040495432 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
76 |
0.7% |
0.006676037 |
r17pk52
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More measures to protect citizens from terrorist
threats, even at the expense of privacy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from
potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of
privacy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1091 |
9.6% |
0.095836261 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2391 |
21.0% |
0.210031623 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
3212 |
28.2% |
0.282150387 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1358 |
11.9% |
0.119290232 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1335 |
11.7% |
0.117269852 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1300 |
11.4% |
0.114195362 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
613 |
5.4% |
0.053847505 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
84 |
0.7% |
0.007378777 |
r17sdo7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Ideally some groups in society should be on top and others on
the bottom
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
An ideal society requires some groups to be on top and others to be on
the bottom
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
1975 |
30.8% |
0.30806426 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
1219 |
19.0% |
0.19014194 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
847 |
13.2% |
0.13211667 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
866 |
13.5% |
0.13508033 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
793 |
12.4% |
0.12369365 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
528 |
8.2% |
0.08235845 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
116 |
1.8% |
0.01809390 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
1.0% |
0.01045079 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4973 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_2
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
3719 |
58.0% |
0.580096709 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
771 |
12.0% |
0.120262050 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
428 |
6.7% |
0.066760256 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
726 |
11.3% |
0.113242864 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
450 |
7.0% |
0.070191858 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
204 |
3.2% |
0.031820309 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
44 |
0.7% |
0.006863204 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
69 |
1.1% |
0.010762752 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4973 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_3
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: No one group should dominate in society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
No one group should dominate in society.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
486 |
7.6% |
0.07580721 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
358 |
5.6% |
0.05584152 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
405 |
6.3% |
0.06317267 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
658 |
10.3% |
0.10263609 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
610 |
9.5% |
0.09514896 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
1200 |
18.7% |
0.18717829 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
2623 |
40.9% |
0.40914054 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
1.1% |
0.01107472 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4973 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_4
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the
top
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
275 |
4.3% |
0.04289502 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
479 |
7.5% |
0.07471533 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
620 |
9.7% |
0.09670878 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
899 |
14.0% |
0.14022773 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
714 |
11.1% |
0.11137108 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
1310 |
20.4% |
0.20433630 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
2025 |
31.6% |
0.31586336 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
1.4% |
0.01388239 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4973 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_5
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Equality between groups should not be our main goal
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Equality between groups should not be our main goal.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
1370 |
21.4% |
0.21369521 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
1267 |
19.8% |
0.19762908 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
712 |
11.1% |
0.11105912 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
1107 |
17.3% |
0.17267197 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
895 |
14.0% |
0.13960381 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
632 |
9.9% |
0.09858056 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
336 |
5.2% |
0.05240992 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
92 |
1.4% |
0.01435034 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4973 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_6
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: It is unjust to try to make groups equal
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
1468 |
22.9% |
0.22898144 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
1144 |
17.8% |
0.17844330 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
715 |
11.2% |
0.11152706 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
1343 |
20.9% |
0.20948370 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
840 |
13.1% |
0.13102480 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
547 |
8.5% |
0.08532210 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
240 |
3.7% |
0.03743566 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
114 |
1.8% |
0.01778194 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4973 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_7
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: We should equalize conditions for different groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
55 |
0.9% |
0.008579005 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
164 |
2.6% |
0.025581033 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
373 |
5.8% |
0.058181251 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
660 |
10.3% |
0.102948058 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
1192 |
18.6% |
0.185930432 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
1510 |
23.6% |
0.235532678 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
2374 |
37.0% |
0.370301045 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
1.3% |
0.012946498 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4973 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_8
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: We should give all groups an equal chance to succeed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should work to give all groups an equal chance to succeed.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
26 |
0.4% |
0.004055530 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
34 |
0.5% |
0.005303385 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
55 |
0.9% |
0.008579005 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
304 |
4.7% |
0.047418499 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
570 |
8.9% |
0.088909686 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
1235 |
19.3% |
0.192637654 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
4116 |
64.2% |
0.642021526 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
1.1% |
0.011074715 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4973 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_1
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Respect for parents and for older people is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that [he/she] should always show respect for [his/her]
parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be
obedient.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
166 |
3.3% |
0.03338025 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
440 |
8.8% |
0.08847778 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
860 |
17.3% |
0.17293384 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1849 |
37.2% |
0.37180776 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1083 |
21.8% |
0.21777599 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
479 |
9.6% |
0.09632013 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
96 |
1.9% |
0.01930424 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6411 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_2
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Religious faith is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do
what [his/her] religion requires.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
2657 |
53.4% |
0.53428514 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
916 |
18.4% |
0.18419465 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
596 |
12.0% |
0.11984717 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
453 |
9.1% |
0.09109190 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
164 |
3.3% |
0.03297808 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
97 |
2.0% |
0.01950533 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
1.8% |
0.01809773 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6411 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_3
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To help people around you is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She]
wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001608687 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
50 |
1.0% |
0.010054293 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
253 |
5.1% |
0.050874724 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1726 |
34.7% |
0.347074201 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1863 |
37.5% |
0.374622964 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
985 |
19.8% |
0.198069576 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
88 |
1.8% |
0.017695556 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6411 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_4
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have all people in the world be treated equally is
important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated
equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in
life.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005630404 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
114 |
2.3% |
0.022923788 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
263 |
5.3% |
0.052885582 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1286 |
25.9% |
0.258596421 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1794 |
36.1% |
0.360748039 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1399 |
28.1% |
0.281319123 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
1.8% |
0.017896642 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6411 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_5
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be interested in things and to be curious is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She]
likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
22 |
0.4% |
0.004423889 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
94 |
1.9% |
0.018902071 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
429 |
8.6% |
0.086265836 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1589 |
32.0% |
0.319525437 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1716 |
34.5% |
0.345063342 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1034 |
20.8% |
0.207922783 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
1.8% |
0.017896642 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6411 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_6
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take risks and look for new experiences is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He’s/she’s] always looking for new
experiences.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
497 |
10.0% |
0.09993967 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1061 |
21.3% |
0.21335210 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1674 |
33.7% |
0.33661774 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1168 |
23.5% |
0.23486829 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
374 |
7.5% |
0.07520611 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
109 |
2.2% |
0.02191836 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
1.8% |
0.01809773 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6411 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_7
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To seek out opportunites to have fun is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for
[him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
176 |
3.5% |
0.03539111 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
587 |
11.8% |
0.11803740 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1431 |
28.8% |
0.28775387 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1826 |
36.7% |
0.36718279 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
634 |
12.7% |
0.12748844 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
227 |
4.6% |
0.04564649 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
92 |
1.8% |
0.01849990 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6411 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_8
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be sucessful and to impress other people is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress
other people.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
523 |
10.5% |
0.10516791 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1022 |
20.6% |
0.20550975 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1663 |
33.4% |
0.33440579 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1114 |
22.4% |
0.22400965 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
421 |
8.5% |
0.08465715 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
143 |
2.9% |
0.02875528 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
1.7% |
0.01749447 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6411 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_9
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take the lead and tell others what to do is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to
do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
563 |
11.3% |
0.11321134 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1053 |
21.2% |
0.21174341 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1562 |
31.4% |
0.31409612 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1323 |
26.6% |
0.26603660 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
313 |
6.3% |
0.06293988 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
71 |
1.4% |
0.01427710 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
88 |
1.8% |
0.01769556 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6411 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_10
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have things tidy and clean is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She]
really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
82 |
1.6% |
0.01648904 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
264 |
5.3% |
0.05308667 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
685 |
13.8% |
0.13774382 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1703 |
34.2% |
0.34244923 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1364 |
27.4% |
0.27428112 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
786 |
15.8% |
0.15805349 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
1.8% |
0.01789664 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6411 |
|
NA |
r17bk42
|
Variable label:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in
that case how many?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in
that case how many?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert < 15]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
None |
6039 |
79.0% |
0.7900313972 |
| 1 |
1 |
675 |
8.8% |
0.0883045526 |
| 2 |
2 |
672 |
8.8% |
0.0879120879 |
| 3 |
3 |
162 |
2.1% |
0.0211930926 |
| 4 |
4 |
24 |
0.3% |
0.0031397174 |
| 5 |
5 |
4 |
0.1% |
0.0005232862 |
| 6 |
6 or more |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0001308216 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.9% |
0.0087650445 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3740 |
|
NA |
r17pk14
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Sometimes politics is so complicated that it’s hard to
understand
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not
understand what it’s about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 16]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
245 |
6.6% |
0.06550802 |
| 2 |
Agree |
528 |
14.1% |
0.14117647 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
998 |
26.7% |
0.26684492 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
358 |
9.6% |
0.09572193 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
456 |
12.2% |
0.12192513 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
768 |
20.5% |
0.20534759 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
327 |
8.7% |
0.08743316 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
1.6% |
0.01604278 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7644 |
|
NA |
r17pk13
|
Variable label:
|
Whether the political system in Norway allow you to have a say
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like
you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 16]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
32 |
0.9% |
0.00855615 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
409 |
10.9% |
0.10935829 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
1649 |
44.1% |
0.44090909 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
1256 |
33.6% |
0.33582888 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
323 |
8.6% |
0.08636364 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
1.9% |
0.01898396 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7644 |
|
NA |
r17oppvekstkom
|
Variable label:
|
Municipality of residence at age 15. [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like to ask you for the municipality in which you lived the
year you turned 15. If you lived in several municipalities the year you
turned 15, you can give the municipality where you lived for the largest
part of the year.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. Custom built search function. Desktop and mobile
differed slightly. Device decided upon loading the question.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11384]
[Range:-]
|
r17oppvekstkom_utland
|
Variable label:
|
Municipality of residence: Did not live in Norway [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
I did not live in Norway the year I turned 15.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. Custom built search function. Desktop and mobile
differed slightly. Device decided upon loading the question.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy
considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers
after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11384]
[Range:-]
|
r17oppvekstkom_mangler
|
Variable label:
|
Municipality of residence: Municipality not listed [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
My municipality is not listed.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. Custom built search function. Desktop and mobile
differed slightly. Device decided upon loading the question.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11384]
[Range:-]
|
r17oppvekstkom_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Municipality of residence at age 15. [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
When I turned 15, I lived in the following municipality:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17oppvekstkom_mangler = 1 Custom built search function.
Desktop and mobile differed slightly. Device decided upon loading the
question.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy
considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers
after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11384]
[Range:-]
|
r17oppvekstfylke
|
Variable label:
|
Respondents home county at 15 years of age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r17oppvekstkom]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:9680] [Invalid:1704]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
1028 |
10.6% |
0.10619835 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
836 |
8.6% |
0.08636364 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
569 |
5.9% |
0.05878099 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
551 |
5.7% |
0.05692149 |
| 30 |
Viken |
1949 |
20.1% |
0.20134298 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
642 |
6.6% |
0.06632231 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
757 |
7.8% |
0.07820248 |
| 42 |
Agder |
492 |
5.1% |
0.05082645 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
1478 |
15.3% |
0.15268595 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
897 |
9.3% |
0.09266529 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
481 |
5.0% |
0.04969008 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1704 |
|
NA |
r17pkby2
|
Variable label:
|
Whether your local environment has become safer the last couple of years
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past
couple of years.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11384] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much safer |
193 |
1.7% |
0.01695362 |
| 2 |
Somewhat safer |
927 |
8.1% |
0.08143008 |
| 3 |
No change in safety |
6536 |
57.4% |
0.57413914 |
| 4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
3161 |
27.8% |
0.27767041 |
| 5 |
Much more unsafe |
<
