Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
|
Sveinung Arnesen
|
NORCE
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Marta Eidheim
|
UiB
|
|
Yvette Peters
|
UiB
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Lund Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
|
Arjan Schakel
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in seven
waves:
In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 1).
In wave 3, 5 623 members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 3).
In wave 8, 4 245 new
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8).
In wave
11, 2 069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave
11).
In wave 14, 2 036 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 14).
In wave 16, 5 163 panel members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 16).
In wave 18, 2 048
panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 18).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry, while in wave 8 the
gross sample amounted to 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, 14, and 18, a
corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. In wave 16, the
gross sample was 34 000.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d)
gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment.
Recruitment of new members to the panel was completed in several steps.
First, an invitation letter was sent to everyone in the sample. The
invitation letter contained the following information: a) description of
the project; b) current privacy and procedural privacy guidelines; c)
timeframe for the project; d) participants right to opt out of the
panel; e) contact information to the project mangers ; f) a unique login
code and URL for the Norwegian Citizens’ Panel’s website; g) estimated
time to complete the survey (15 minutes).
To maximize the recruitment rate, an incentive has been used in the form
of three travel gift cards. The value of the travel gift cards is 8,000
NOK. To participate in the drawing of the gift card, it is required that
the e-mail address is provided. Information about the lottery is
included in all correspondence with the respondents, with the exception
of the final reminder via text message.
The invitation letter was posted on June 3rd, 2020. A reminder was sent
to those respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b) had
not completed the survey. New respondents received only one reminder,
either via a postcard or a text message. The text message was sent to
respondents under the age of 60. The postcard was sent to respondents
over the age of 60 and to those without a registered mobile number.
Respondents were invited to participate in the Norwegian Citizens’ Panel
with reference to the invitation letter. The postcard was posted on June
17th, 2020. The login code was also given in the postcard. The text
message was sent out on June 15th, 2019. The text message contained both
a login code and a direct link to the survey.
Data collection among old panel members was done in parallel with the
recruitment of new respondents. The invitation mail was sent out on June
2nd, 2020. The first, second, and third reminders were sent to the
respondents’ email, on 9th, 12th, 18th of November, 2020, respectively.
Panel members with a registered mobile number received the last reminder
in form of a text message.
Wave 18 ended June 29th, 2020.
Weighting
To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated.
The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population
and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata
in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns
values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will
receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a
weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the
documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information
regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are
based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample
file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information
regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when
answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-105
|
2023-11-22
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 18
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r18Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r18Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r18Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-105
|
2023-10-25
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 18
|
|
v-104
|
2022-02-01
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 18
|
|
NA
|
2021-12-07
|
r18bk21
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2021-12-07
|
r18bk21_kodet
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2021-10-08
|
responseid
|
Corrected
one (1) responseid
|
|
v-103
|
2021-10-08
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 18
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r18bk26_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r18bk26 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r18bk33_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r18bk33 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r18bk21_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r18bk21 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r18bk26_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r18bk33_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r18bk21_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-102
|
2021-02-12
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 18
|
|
NA
|
2021-02-11
|
r18oppvekstfylke
|
New
variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years
of age, based on registered municipality in r18oppvekstkom
|
|
NA
|
2021-02-11
|
r18oppvekstfylke
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-02-03
|
r18P3_2
|
New
variable: Constituency of parliament election 2021
|
|
NA
|
2021-02-03
|
r18P3_2
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2020-12-01
|
r18och5c_check
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-10-12
|
r18kmccsfamiliar
|
Corrected
interviewer instruction
|
|
NA
|
2020-10-12
|
r18kmccsopen
|
Corrected
interviewer instruction
|
|
NA
|
2020-10-12
|
r18kmccsa
|
Corrected
interviewer instruction
|
|
NA
|
2020-10-12
|
r18kmccsb
|
Corrected
interviewer instruction
|
|
v-101
|
2020-10-12
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 18
|
|
NA
|
2020-10-09
|
r18kmccsfamiliar
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-10-09
|
r18kmccsopen
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-10-09
|
r18kmccsa
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-10-09
|
r18kmccsb
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-100
|
2020-08-17
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 18
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 18 - v-105-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
12727
|
|
# Variables
|
470
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r18rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-18]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Round 1 |
1652 |
13.0% |
0.12980278 |
| 3 |
Round 3 |
1801 |
14.2% |
0.14151018 |
| 8 |
Round 8 |
1768 |
13.9% |
0.13891726 |
| 11 |
Round 11 |
1038 |
8.2% |
0.08155889 |
| 14 |
Round 14 |
1129 |
8.9% |
0.08870904 |
| 16 |
Round 16 |
3298 |
25.9% |
0.25913412 |
| 18 |
Round 18 |
2041 |
16.0% |
0.16036772 |
r18interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r18interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12362] [Invalid:365]
[Range:-]
|
r18browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r18browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r18mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
7303 |
57.4% |
0.5738194 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
5424 |
42.6% |
0.4261806 |
r18opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r18enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
7445 |
58.5% |
0.58497682 |
| 2 |
Touch |
5237 |
41.1% |
0.41148739 |
| 3 |
Generic |
45 |
0.4% |
0.00353579 |
r18advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r18getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r18group
|
Variable label:
|
[Subgroup in wave 18. Assigned based on background information and
randomization]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Subgroup in wave 18. Assigned based on background information and
randomization]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 |
1280 |
10.1% |
0.10057358 |
| 2 |
Group 2 |
1255 |
9.9% |
0.09860926 |
| 3 |
Group 3 |
2694 |
21.2% |
0.21167596 |
| 4 |
Group 4 |
1343 |
10.6% |
0.10552369 |
| 5 |
Group 5 |
1294 |
10.2% |
0.10167361 |
| 6 |
Group 6 |
2820 |
22.2% |
0.22157618 |
| 7 |
Group 7 |
2041 |
16.0% |
0.16036772 |
r18kmclimlifeopen
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What do you think it means to live a climate-friendly life? [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are many discussions about how to adapt one’s way of life to
climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think it means to live a climate-friendly life?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All replies are welcome,
preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you would
prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 2]
[Text data will not be distributed due
to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12727]
[Range:-]
|
r18kmmikroplastopen
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What do you think of when you read or hear the word
‘microplastics’? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think of when you read or hear the word ‘microplastics’?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All replies are welcome,
preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you would
prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 6]
[Text data will not be distributed due
to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12727]
[Range:-]
|
r18pk15
|
Variable label:
|
Whether most people in general can be trusted
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
23 |
1.1% |
0.011268986 |
| 1 |
1 |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005389515 |
| 2 |
2 |
25 |
1.2% |
0.012248898 |
| 3 |
3 |
66 |
3.2% |
0.032337090 |
| 4 |
4 |
79 |
3.9% |
0.038706516 |
| 5 |
5 |
202 |
9.9% |
0.098971093 |
| 6 |
6 |
201 |
9.8% |
0.098481137 |
| 7 |
7 |
479 |
23.5% |
0.234688878 |
| 8 |
8 |
487 |
23.9% |
0.238608525 |
| 9 |
9 |
199 |
9.8% |
0.097501225 |
| 10 |
10 - Most people can be trusted |
263 |
12.9% |
0.128858403 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002939735 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10686 |
|
NA |
r18pktilfreds1
|
Variable label:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
670 |
32.8% |
0.328270456 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1064 |
52.1% |
0.521313082 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
232 |
11.4% |
0.113669770 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
59 |
2.9% |
0.028907398 |
| 5 |
Very dissatisfied |
12 |
0.6% |
0.005879471 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001959824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10686 |
|
NA |
r18pk9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The most important political issues for you personally (1) [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
[Text data will not be distributed due
to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12727]
[Range:-]
|
r18pk9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The second most important political issues for you personally (2)
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
[Text data will not be distributed due
to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12727]
[Range:-]
|
r18pk9_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The third most important political issues for you personally (3)
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
[Text data will not be distributed due
to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12727]
[Range:-]
|
r18pk10
|
Variable label:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
404 |
19.8% |
0.197942185 |
| 2 |
Good |
978 |
47.9% |
0.479176874 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
329 |
16.1% |
0.161195492 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
129 |
6.3% |
0.063204312 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
141 |
6.9% |
0.069083782 |
| 6 |
Bad |
43 |
2.1% |
0.021068104 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004899559 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003429691 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10686 |
|
NA |
r18pktilfreds4
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with democracy in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
396 |
19.4% |
0.194022538 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1109 |
54.3% |
0.543361098 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
385 |
18.9% |
0.188633023 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
115 |
5.6% |
0.056344929 |
| 5 |
Very dissatisfied |
28 |
1.4% |
0.013718765 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.4% |
0.003919647 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10686 |
|
NA |
r18pktilfreds3
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the present government in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
156 |
7.6% |
0.076433121 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
695 |
34.1% |
0.340519353 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
682 |
33.4% |
0.334149927 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
380 |
18.6% |
0.186183244 |
| 5 |
Very dissatisfied |
114 |
5.6% |
0.055854973 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.7% |
0.006859383 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10686 |
|
NA |
r18pk204
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1, 3, 4 or 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
219 |
3.3% |
0.033126607 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1565 |
23.7% |
0.236726668 |
| 3 |
The Progressive Party |
481 |
7.3% |
0.072757525 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
193 |
2.9% |
0.029193768 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
612 |
9.3% |
0.092572984 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
892 |
13.5% |
0.134926637 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
417 |
6.3% |
0.063076690 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1262 |
19.1% |
0.190893965 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
358 |
5.4% |
0.054152171 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
106 |
1.6% |
0.016033883 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
167 |
2.5% |
0.025260929 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
145 |
2.2% |
0.021933142 |
| 13 |
Other: |
161 |
2.4% |
0.024353350 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.5% |
0.004991681 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6116 |
|
NA |
r18pk204_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1, 3, 4 or 5]
[Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12727]
[Range:-]
|
r18kmccsfamiliar
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard that CO2 can be captured and stored?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard that CO2 (carbon dioxide) can be captured and stored?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 or 3 and r16group != 3 or 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No, I have not heard about this |
473 |
15.4% |
0.154172099 |
| 2 |
Yes, I have heard a little about this |
1791 |
58.4% |
0.583767927 |
| 3 |
Yes, I have heard a lot about this |
795 |
25.9% |
0.259126467 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.3% |
0.002933507 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9659 |
|
NA |
r18kmccsopen
|
Variable label:
|
Your thoughts about project for CO2 capture and storage facilities [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Increased concentration of CO2 (carbon dioxide) in the atmosphere
contributes to climate change. Technology is available to capture,
transport and store CO2 before it is released.
This technology is now being tested in Norway. CO2 capture will take
place at a waste facility (Fortum) and at a cement factory (Norcem),
both located next to the Oslo Fjord. The gas will be transported by boat
to a reception facility outside Bergen. From there, the gas will be
carried in a pipeline far out in the North Sea before eventually being
stored 3000 metres below the seabed. The facility is scheduled to be
operational from 2024.
The facility has the capacity to receive CO2 from several sources of
emission, some of them located outside of Norway. This is a pilot
project that could lead to the technology being used to build many more
facilities, both in the North Sea and in other parts of the world. On a
large scale, this technology could help limit climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to write down what you think about this project.
|
|
Post-question:
|
All replies are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few
words if you would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 or 3 and r16group != 3 or 7]
[Text data
will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can
be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen
Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12727]
[Range:-]
|
r18kmccsa
|
Variable label:
|
Are you mainly positive or negative about this technology?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you mainly positive or negative about this technology?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 or 3 and r16group != 3 or 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Positive |
2014 |
65.6% |
0.656453716 |
| 2 |
Negative |
327 |
10.7% |
0.106584094 |
| 3 |
No opinion |
715 |
23.3% |
0.233050847 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.4% |
0.003911343 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9659 |
|
NA |
r18kmccsb
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about this technology as measure to limit climate
change
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you mainly positive or negative about this technology as a measure
to limit climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 or 3 and r16group != 3 or 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Positive |
2076 |
67.7% |
0.676662321 |
| 2 |
Negative |
390 |
12.7% |
0.127118644 |
| 3 |
No opinion |
584 |
19.0% |
0.190352021 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.6% |
0.005867014 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9659 |
|
NA |
r18och1
|
Variable label:
|
Voted for which party in the 2017 general election
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party did you vote for in the 2017 general election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
60 |
4.1% |
0.041237113 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
338 |
23.2% |
0.232302405 |
| 3 |
The Progressive Party |
117 |
8.0% |
0.080412371 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
58 |
4.0% |
0.039862543 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
107 |
7.4% |
0.073539519 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
109 |
7.5% |
0.074914089 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
79 |
5.4% |
0.054295533 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
334 |
23.0% |
0.229553265 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
58 |
4.0% |
0.039862543 |
| 10 |
I did not vote |
75 |
5.2% |
0.051546392 |
| 11 |
Not entitled to vote |
77 |
5.3% |
0.052920962 |
| 12 |
Other: |
32 |
2.2% |
0.021993127 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007560137 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11272 |
|
NA |
r18och1_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Voted for which party in the 2017 general election [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 2 or 4]
[Text data will not be distributed
due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12727]
[Range:-]
|
r18och2
|
Variable label:
|
Place yourself on the economic right-wing/left-wing scale
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People often talk about right-wing economics and left-wing economics.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means
left-wing in relation to economic issues and 10 means right-wing in
relation to economic issues?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Left wing |
54 |
2.1% |
0.02078522 |
| 1 |
1 |
92 |
3.5% |
0.03541186 |
| 2 |
2 |
270 |
10.4% |
0.10392610 |
| 3 |
3 |
381 |
14.7% |
0.14665127 |
| 4 |
4 |
275 |
10.6% |
0.10585065 |
| 5 |
5 |
482 |
18.6% |
0.18552733 |
| 6 |
6 |
274 |
10.5% |
0.10546574 |
| 7 |
7 |
329 |
12.7% |
0.12663587 |
| 8 |
8 |
276 |
10.6% |
0.10623557 |
| 9 |
9 |
62 |
2.4% |
0.02386451 |
| 10 |
10 - Right wing |
72 |
2.8% |
0.02771363 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.2% |
0.01193226 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10129 |
|
NA |
r18pad1
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: The police reform will contribute to more visible and
accessible police
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The police reform took effect on 1 January 2016. The aim of the reform
is to ensure the presence of competent and effective local law
enforcement where the population lives, while developing good
professional environments equipped to meet today’s and tomorrow’s crime
challenges. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
proposition/statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The police reform will contribute to more visible and accessible police.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
12 |
1.0% |
0.009561753 |
| 2 |
Agree |
82 |
6.5% |
0.065338645 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
152 |
12.1% |
0.121115538 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
337 |
26.9% |
0.268525896 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
214 |
17.1% |
0.170517928 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
292 |
23.3% |
0.232669323 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
155 |
12.4% |
0.123505976 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.9% |
0.008764940 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11472 |
|
NA |
r18pad2
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Norway should halve today’s meat and dairy production by 2050
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Research suggests that livestock husbandry may be negative for the
environment. Meanwhile, meat and dairy products are an important source
of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should halve today’s meat and dairy production by 2050
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
52 |
4.1% |
0.041434263 |
| 2 |
Agree |
97 |
7.7% |
0.077290837 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
198 |
15.8% |
0.157768924 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
134 |
10.7% |
0.106772908 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
200 |
15.9% |
0.159362550 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
312 |
24.9% |
0.248605578 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
253 |
20.2% |
0.201593625 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007171315 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11472 |
|
NA |
r18pad3
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: The government should work to reduce wealth differences
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government should work to reduce the wealth differences in society
to a greater extent.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
246 |
19.6% |
0.196015936 |
| 2 |
Agree |
329 |
26.2% |
0.262151394 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
312 |
24.9% |
0.248605578 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
115 |
9.2% |
0.091633466 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
124 |
9.9% |
0.098804781 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
87 |
6.9% |
0.069322709 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
32 |
2.5% |
0.025498008 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.8% |
0.007968127 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11472 |
|
NA |
r18pad5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party you most associate with
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following political parties do you most associate with?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
71 |
5.7% |
0.05657371 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
142 |
11.3% |
0.11314741 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party |
289 |
23.0% |
0.23027888 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
169 |
13.5% |
0.13466135 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
77 |
6.1% |
0.06135458 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party |
54 |
4.3% |
0.04302789 |
| 7 |
The Christian Democrats |
46 |
3.7% |
0.03665339 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party |
279 |
22.2% |
0.22231076 |
| 9 |
The Progressive Party |
103 |
8.2% |
0.08207171 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
2.0% |
0.01992032 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11472 |
|
NA |
r18pad5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party you least associate with
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following political parties do you least associate with?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
276 |
22.0% |
0.21992032 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
42 |
3.3% |
0.03346614 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party |
16 |
1.3% |
0.01274900 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
14 |
1.1% |
0.01115538 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
164 |
13.1% |
0.13067729 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party |
23 |
1.8% |
0.01832669 |
| 7 |
The Christian Democrats |
142 |
11.3% |
0.11314741 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party |
28 |
2.2% |
0.02231076 |
| 9 |
The Progressive Party |
530 |
42.2% |
0.42231076 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.6% |
0.01593625 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11472 |
|
NA |
r18pad53apipe0
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly chooses answer in r18pad5_1 or r18pad5_2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects between answers from r18pad5_1 and
r18pad5_2. Randomizes if r18group = 2 & (r18pad5_1 and r18pad5_2 is
answered)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:11507]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[R18PAD5_1] |
612 |
50.2% |
0.5016393 |
| 2 |
[R18PAD5_2] |
608 |
49.8% |
0.4983607 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11507 |
|
NA |
r18pad53apipe1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly choses one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b. Randomizes if r18group = 2 & (r18pad5_1 and r18pad5_2 is
answered)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:11507]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
top candidate |
322 |
26.4% |
0.2639344 |
| 2 |
top candidate |
305 |
25.0% |
0.2500000 |
| 3 |
local party |
290 |
23.8% |
0.2377049 |
| 4 |
three main candidates |
303 |
24.8% |
0.2483607 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11507 |
|
NA |
r18pad53apipe2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly choses one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b. Randomizes if r18group = 2 & (r18pad5_1 and r18pad5_2 is
answered)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:11507]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
He |
322 |
26.4% |
0.2639344 |
| 2 |
She |
305 |
25.0% |
0.2500000 |
| 3 |
The party |
290 |
23.8% |
0.2377049 |
| 4 |
One of them |
303 |
24.8% |
0.2483607 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11507 |
|
NA |
r18pad53apipe3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly choses one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b. Randomizes if r18group = 2 & (r18pad5_1 and r18pad5_2 is
answered)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:11507]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
He |
322 |
26.4% |
0.2639344 |
| 2 |
She |
305 |
25.0% |
0.2500000 |
| 3 |
The party |
290 |
23.8% |
0.2377049 |
| 4 |
Another |
303 |
24.8% |
0.2483607 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11507 |
|
NA |
r18pad53apipe4
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly choses one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b. Randomizes if r18group = 2 & (r18pad5_1 and r18pad5_2 is
answered)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:11507]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
He |
322 |
26.4% |
0.2639344 |
| 2 |
She |
305 |
25.0% |
0.2500000 |
| 3 |
The party |
290 |
23.8% |
0.2377049 |
| 4 |
The third |
303 |
24.8% |
0.2483607 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11507 |
|
NA |
r18pad53apipe5
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly choses one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b. Randomizes if r18group = 2 & (r18pad5_1 and r18pad5_2 is
answered)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:11507]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the candidate |
322 |
26.4% |
0.2639344 |
| 2 |
the candidate |
305 |
25.0% |
0.2500000 |
| 3 |
the party |
290 |
23.8% |
0.2377049 |
| 4 |
the party |
303 |
24.8% |
0.2483607 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11507 |
|
NA |
r18pad5_3a
|
Variable label:
|
Your impression of political candidates based on (positive) information
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that local elections are about to take place in your
municipality. During the election campaign, the local newspaper writes
the following about the [R18PAD5_1/ R18PAD5_2]:
[He/She/The party/One of them] has put forward a good plan to improve
the municipality’s roads and parks. [He/She/The party/Another] shows a
genuine commitment to the municipality’s inhabitants. [He/She/The
party/The third] has, according to the newspaper’s opinion poll, high
voter confidence.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on the information above, what is your impression of [the
candidate/the candidate/the party/the party]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in r18pad53apipe0, r18pad53apipe1, r18pad53apipe2,
r18pad53apipe3, r18pad53apipe4, r18pad53apipe5. Asked if r18group = 2
and r18pad5_1 and r18pad5_2 is answered]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Strongly dislike |
54 |
4.3% |
0.04302789 |
| 1 |
1 |
51 |
4.1% |
0.04063745 |
| 2 |
2 |
61 |
4.9% |
0.04860558 |
| 3 |
3 |
91 |
7.3% |
0.07250996 |
| 4 |
4 |
77 |
6.1% |
0.06135458 |
| 5 |
5 |
206 |
16.4% |
0.16414343 |
| 6 |
6 |
143 |
11.4% |
0.11394422 |
| 7 |
7 |
171 |
13.6% |
0.13625498 |
| 8 |
8 |
182 |
14.5% |
0.14501992 |
| 9 |
9 |
71 |
5.7% |
0.05657371 |
| 10 |
10 Strongly like |
108 |
8.6% |
0.08605578 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
3.2% |
0.03187251 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11472 |
|
NA |
r18pad53bpipe1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly choses one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b. Randomizes if r18group = 2 & (r18pad5_1 and r18pad5_2 is
answered)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:11507]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the candidate |
322 |
26.4% |
0.2639344 |
| 2 |
the candidate |
305 |
25.0% |
0.2500000 |
| 3 |
the party |
290 |
23.8% |
0.2377049 |
| 4 |
one of the candidates |
303 |
24.8% |
0.2483607 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11507 |
|
NA |
r18pad53bpipe2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly choses one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b. Randomizes if r18group = 2 & (r18pad5_1 and r18pad5_2 is
answered)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:11507]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
he |
322 |
26.4% |
0.2639344 |
| 2 |
she |
305 |
25.0% |
0.2500000 |
| 3 |
it |
290 |
23.8% |
0.2377049 |
| 4 |
they |
303 |
24.8% |
0.2483607 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11507 |
|
NA |
r18pad53bpipe3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly choses one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects one of four variants of r18pad5_3a and
r18pad5_3b. Randomizes if r18group = 2 & (r18pad5_1 and r18pad5_2 is
answered)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:11507]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the candidate |
322 |
26.4% |
0.2639344 |
| 2 |
the candidate |
305 |
25.0% |
0.2500000 |
| 3 |
the party |
290 |
23.8% |
0.2377049 |
| 4 |
the party |
303 |
24.8% |
0.2483607 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11507 |
|
NA |
r18pad5_3b
|
Variable label:
|
Your impression of political candidates based on (negative) information
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The week before the election, the local newspaper writes a new story
about [the candidate/the candidate/the party/one of the candidates]. An
internal correspondence leak reveals that [he/she/it/they] is/are not
planning to fulfil the promise of improving the municipality’s roads and
parks.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In light of this new information, what is your impression of [the
candidate/the candidate/the party/the party]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in r18pad53bpipe1, r18pad53bpipe2, r18pad53bpipe3. Asked if
r18group = 2 and r18pad5_1 and r18pad5_2 is answered]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Strongly dislike |
319 |
25.4% |
0.2541832669 |
| 1 |
1 |
153 |
12.2% |
0.1219123506 |
| 2 |
2 |
196 |
15.6% |
0.1561752988 |
| 3 |
3 |
194 |
15.5% |
0.1545816733 |
| 4 |
4 |
94 |
7.5% |
0.0749003984 |
| 5 |
5 |
128 |
10.2% |
0.1019920319 |
| 6 |
6 |
51 |
4.1% |
0.0406374502 |
| 7 |
7 |
47 |
3.7% |
0.0374501992 |
| 8 |
8 |
21 |
1.7% |
0.0167330677 |
| 9 |
9 |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007968127 |
| 10 |
10 Strongly like |
11 |
0.9% |
0.0087649402 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
3.2% |
0.0318725100 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11472 |
|
NA |
r18padprolegran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly chooses between r18padproleg1 and r19padproleg2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects between r18padproleg1 and r19padproleg2.
Randomizes if r18group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3318] [Invalid:9409]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
1656 |
49.9% |
0.4990958 |
| 2 |
2 |
1662 |
50.1% |
0.5009042 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9409 |
|
NA |
r18padprolegran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly chooses among variants for text substition in
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects among alternatives for
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2. Randomizes if r18group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3318] [Invalid:9409]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
12 |
1046 |
31.5% |
0.3152502 |
| 2 |
100 |
1124 |
33.9% |
0.3387583 |
| 3 |
300 |
1148 |
34.6% |
0.3459916 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9409 |
|
NA |
r18padprolegran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly chooses among variants for text substition in
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects among alternatives for
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2. Randomizes if r18group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3318] [Invalid:9409]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
weekday |
1654 |
49.8% |
0.4984931 |
| 2 |
weekend day |
1664 |
50.2% |
0.5015069 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9409 |
|
NA |
r18padprolegran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly chooses among variants for text substition in
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects among alternatives for
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2. Randomizes if r18group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3318] [Invalid:9409]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
half a day |
1090 |
32.9% |
0.3285112 |
| 2 |
a day |
1094 |
33.0% |
0.3297167 |
| 3 |
two days |
1134 |
34.2% |
0.3417722 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9409 |
|
NA |
r18padprolegran5
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly chooses among variants for text substition in
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects among alternatives for
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2. Randomizes if r18group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3318] [Invalid:9409]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Registration is open to all of the municipality’s inhabitants until the panel is
full. |
1676 |
50.5% |
0.5051236 |
| 2 |
Participants are randomly chosen from the municipality’s inhabitants. |
1642 |
49.5% |
0.4948764 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9409 |
|
NA |
r18padprolegran4
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly chooses among variants for text substition in
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects among alternatives for
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2. Randomizes if r18group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3318] [Invalid:9409]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
not compensated financially |
767 |
23.1% |
0.2311634 |
| 2 |
receive NOK 200 compensation per hour |
899 |
27.1% |
0.2709464 |
| 3 |
receive NOK 500 compensation per hour |
846 |
25.5% |
0.2549729 |
| 4 |
receive NOK 1000 compensation per hour |
806 |
24.3% |
0.2429174 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9409 |
|
NA |
r18padprolegran6
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly chooses among variants for text substition in
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects among alternatives for
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2. Randomizes if r18group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3318] [Invalid:9409]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
their own assessments and preferences |
1162 |
35.0% |
0.3502110 |
| 2 |
credible information from independent experts |
1086 |
32.7% |
0.3273056 |
| 3 |
exchange of opinions between participants in smaller groups, where the
discussion is led by independent meeting leaders |
1070 |
32.2% |
0.3224834 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9409 |
|
NA |
r18padprolegran7
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly chooses among variants for text substition in
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects among alternatives for
r18padproleg1/r18padproleg2. Randomizes if r18group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3318] [Invalid:9409]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The names of those participating on the citizens’ panel and how they voted will
be made public |
1656 |
49.9% |
0.4990958 |
| 2 |
The names of those participating on the citizens’ panel and how they voted will
not be made public |
1662 |
50.1% |
0.5009042 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9409 |
|
NA |
r18padproleg1
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have participated on a citizens’ panel?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now want to hear your opinion on the use of so-called citizens’
panels in Norwegian municipalities. This is an arrangement where a group
of municipality inhabitants are invited to discuss and develop an
opinion on a political issue. We will now present a way in which the
citizens’ panel may be implemented, and ask you to consider if you would
have participated on the panel if it was implemented as we
describe:
The citizens’ panel consists of [12 / 100 / 300] participants, takes
place in the centre of your municipality on a [weekday / weekend day],
and lasts for [half a day / a day / two days]. Participants are [not
compensated financially/receive NOK 200 compensation per hour/ NOK 500
per hour / NOK 1000 per hour] when participating on the panel.
[Registration is open to all of the municipality’s inhabitants until the
panel is full. / Participants are randomly chosen from the
municipality’s inhabitants]. The issue to be discussed is a major
housing project in the municipality. Participants decide according to
[their own assessments and preferences / credible information from
independent experts / exchange of opinions between participants in
smaller groups, where the discussion is led by independent meeting
leaders]. The participants then vote on the issue, and the result is
conveyed to the municipal politicians. [The names of those participating
on the citizens’ panel and how they voted will be made public / The
names of those participating on the citizens’ panel and how they voted
will not be made public].
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would have participated on such a citizens’
panel?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in r18padprolegran1, r18padprolegran2, r18padprolegran3,
r18padprolegran4, r18padprolegran5, r18padprolegran6, r18padprolegran7.
Asked if r18group = 1 or 7 and r18padprolegran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 I certainly would not have participated |
232 |
14.0% |
0.140350877 |
| 1 |
1 |
77 |
4.7% |
0.046581972 |
| 2 |
2 |
103 |
6.2% |
0.062310950 |
| 3 |
3 |
117 |
7.1% |
0.070780399 |
| 4 |
4 |
73 |
4.4% |
0.044162129 |
| 5 |
5 |
218 |
13.2% |
0.131881428 |
| 6 |
6 |
85 |
5.1% |
0.051421658 |
| 7 |
7 |
155 |
9.4% |
0.093768905 |
| 8 |
8 |
204 |
12.3% |
0.123411978 |
| 9 |
9 |
97 |
5.9% |
0.058681186 |
| 10 |
10 I certainly would have participated |
287 |
17.4% |
0.173623714 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.003024803 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11074 |
|
NA |
r18padproleg2
|
Variable label:
|
How much emphasis on citizens’ panel when politicians make decision
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now want to hear your opinion on the use of so-called citizens’
panels in Norwegian municipalities. This is an arrangement where a group
of municipality inhabitants are invited to discuss and develop an
opinion on a political issue. We will now present a way in which the
citizens’ panel may be implemented, and ask you to consider how much
emphasis the politicians should place on the results if it was
implemented as we describe:
The citizens’ panel consists of [12 / 100 / 300] participants, takes
place in the centre of your municipality on a [weekday / weekend day],
and lasts for [half a day / a day / two days]. Participants are [not
compensated financially/receive NOK 200 compensation per hour/ NOK 500
per hour / NOK 1000 per hour] when participating on the panel.
[Registration is open to all of the municipality’s inhabitants until the
panel is full. / Participants are randomly chosen from the
municipality’s inhabitants.] The issue to be discussed is a major
housing project in the municipality. Participants decide according to
[their own assessments and preferences / credible information from
independent experts / exchange of opinions between participants in
smaller groups, where the discussion is led by independent meeting
leaders]. The participants then vote on the issue, and the result is
conveyed to the municipal politicians. [The names of those participating
on the citizens’ panel and how they voted will be made public / The
names of those participating on the citizens’ panel and how they voted
will not be made public]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much emphasis do you think should be placed on the result produced
by the citizens’ panel when politicians are to make the final decision
on the matter?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in r18padprolegran1, r18padprolegran2, r18padprolegran3,
r18padprolegran4, r18padprolegran5, r18padprolegran6, r18padprolegran7.
Asked if r18group = 1 or 7 and r18padprolegran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 No emphasis should be placed on the result at all |
79 |
4.8% |
0.047791894 |
| 1 |
1 |
39 |
2.4% |
0.023593466 |
| 2 |
2 |
100 |
6.0% |
0.060496068 |
| 3 |
3 |
160 |
9.7% |
0.096793708 |
| 4 |
4 |
124 |
7.5% |
0.075015124 |
| 5 |
5 |
358 |
21.7% |
0.216575923 |
| 6 |
6 |
228 |
13.8% |
0.137931034 |
| 7 |
7 |
275 |
16.6% |
0.166364186 |
| 8 |
8 |
168 |
10.2% |
0.101633394 |
| 9 |
9 |
61 |
3.7% |
0.036902601 |
| 10 |
10 The result must be followed regardless |
56 |
3.4% |
0.033877798 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.003024803 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11074 |
|
NA |
r18polkom_background1
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these political parties do you feel closest to? [Collected from
r16polkom12]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these political parties do you feel closest to?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Collected from r16polkom12]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1265] [Invalid:11462]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
87 |
6.9% |
0.06877470 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
143 |
11.3% |
0.11304348 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party |
260 |
20.6% |
0.20553360 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
187 |
14.8% |
0.14782609 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
75 |
5.9% |
0.05928854 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party |
56 |
4.4% |
0.04426877 |
| 7 |
The Christian Democrats |
49 |
3.9% |
0.03873518 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party |
298 |
23.6% |
0.23557312 |
| 9 |
The Progress Party |
110 |
8.7% |
0.08695652 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11462 |
|
NA |
r18polkom_background2
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these political parties do you feel furthest from? [Collected
from r16polkom13]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these political parties do you feel furthest from?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Collected from r16polkom13]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1263] [Invalid:11464]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
310 |
24.5% |
0.245447348 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
50 |
4.0% |
0.039588282 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party |
12 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
27 |
2.1% |
0.021377672 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
164 |
13.0% |
0.129849565 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party |
19 |
1.5% |
0.015043547 |
| 7 |
The Christian Democrats |
91 |
7.2% |
0.072050673 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party |
27 |
2.1% |
0.021377672 |
| 9 |
The Progress Party |
563 |
44.6% |
0.445764054 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11464 |
|
NA |
r18polkom_background3
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these issues is most important to you? [Collected from
r16polkom14]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these issues is most important to you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Collected from r16polkom14]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1162] [Invalid:11565]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Whether begging should be legal |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006024096 |
| 2 |
Taxation policies |
257 |
22.1% |
0.221170396 |
| 3 |
Immigration policies |
240 |
20.7% |
0.206540448 |
| 4 |
The merger of municipalities |
95 |
8.2% |
0.081755594 |
| 5 |
Climate and environment |
563 |
48.5% |
0.484509466 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11565 |
|
NA |
r18polkom1s1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Whether people who vote for [r18polkom_background2] make you angry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know how different groups make you feel. For each
feeling/emotion, please specify how these groups make you feel.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who vote for [r18polkom_background2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all angry |
474 |
41.5% |
0.41542507 |
| 2 |
Somewhat angry |
396 |
34.7% |
0.34706398 |
| 3 |
Angry |
139 |
12.2% |
0.12182296 |
| 4 |
Very angry |
84 |
7.4% |
0.07361963 |
| 5 |
Extremely angry |
33 |
2.9% |
0.02892200 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
1.3% |
0.01314636 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom1s1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Whether people who disagree with you about [r18polkom_background3] make
you angry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know how different groups make you feel. For each
feeling/emotion, please specify how these groups make you feel.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about [r18polkom_background3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all angry |
456 |
40.0% |
0.39964943 |
| 2 |
Somewhat angry |
440 |
38.6% |
0.38562664 |
| 3 |
Angry |
153 |
13.4% |
0.13409290 |
| 4 |
Very angry |
60 |
5.3% |
0.05258545 |
| 5 |
Extremely angry |
13 |
1.1% |
0.01139351 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.7% |
0.01665206 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom1s2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Whether people who vote for [r18polkom_background2] make you afraid
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know how different groups make you feel. For each
feeling/emotion, please specify how these groups make you feel.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who vote for [r18polkom_background2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all afraid |
638 |
55.9% |
0.55915863 |
| 2 |
Somewhat afraid |
289 |
25.3% |
0.25328659 |
| 3 |
Afraid |
114 |
10.0% |
0.09991236 |
| 4 |
Very afraid |
58 |
5.1% |
0.05083260 |
| 5 |
Extremely afraid |
23 |
2.0% |
0.02015776 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.7% |
0.01665206 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom1s2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Whether people who disagree with you about [r18polkom_background3] make
you afraid
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know how different groups make you feel. For each
feeling/emotion, please specify how these groups make you feel.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about [r18polkom_background3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all afraid |
645 |
56.5% |
0.565293602 |
| 2 |
Somewhat afraid |
291 |
25.5% |
0.255039439 |
| 3 |
Afraid |
120 |
10.5% |
0.105170903 |
| 4 |
Very afraid |
52 |
4.6% |
0.045574058 |
| 5 |
Extremely afraid |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007887818 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
2.1% |
0.021034181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom1s3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Whether people who vote for [r18polkom_background2] make you disgusted
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know how different groups make you feel. For each
feeling/emotion, please specify how these groups make you feel.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who vote for [r18polkom_background2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all disgusted |
567 |
49.7% |
0.49693252 |
| 2 |
Somewhat disgusted |
373 |
32.7% |
0.32690622 |
| 3 |
Disgusted |
105 |
9.2% |
0.09202454 |
| 4 |
Very disgusted |
46 |
4.0% |
0.04031551 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusted |
28 |
2.5% |
0.02453988 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01928133 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom1s3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Whether people who disagree with you about [r18polkom_background3] make
you disgusted
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know how different groups make you feel. For each
feeling/emotion, please specify how these groups make you feel.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about [r18polkom_background3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all disgusted |
646 |
56.6% |
0.566170026 |
| 2 |
Somewhat disgusted |
350 |
30.7% |
0.306748466 |
| 3 |
Disgusted |
77 |
6.7% |
0.067484663 |
| 4 |
Very disgusted |
35 |
3.1% |
0.030674847 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusted |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006134969 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
2.3% |
0.022787029 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Upset if son/daughter marry someone with opposite political
attudies than mine
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I would be upset if I had a son or daughter who wanted to marry someone
who has completely opposite political attitudes than the ones I have.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
12 |
1.1% |
0.010517090 |
| 2 |
Agree |
61 |
5.3% |
0.053461876 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
208 |
18.2% |
0.182296231 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
201 |
17.6% |
0.176161262 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
92 |
8.1% |
0.080631025 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
305 |
26.7% |
0.267309378 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
254 |
22.3% |
0.222611744 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.7% |
0.007011394 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Have started to dislike people because of their political
attitudes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are people that I have started to dislike because of their
political attitudes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
49 |
4.3% |
0.042944785 |
| 2 |
Agree |
177 |
15.5% |
0.155127082 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
393 |
34.4% |
0.344434706 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
148 |
13.0% |
0.129710780 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
61 |
5.3% |
0.053461876 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
189 |
16.6% |
0.165644172 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
114 |
10.0% |
0.099912358 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008764242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: People I disagree with politically are not bad people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
People I disagree with politically are not bad people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
485 |
42.5% |
0.425065732 |
| 2 |
Agree |
470 |
41.2% |
0.411919369 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
51 |
4.5% |
0.044697634 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
84 |
7.4% |
0.073619632 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008764242 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
16 |
1.4% |
0.014022787 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
1.5% |
0.014899211 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.7% |
0.007011394 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Can tell whether a person is good/bad if you know their
political stances
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
You can tell whether a person is good or bad if you know their political
stances.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
1.2% |
0.012269939 |
| 2 |
Agree |
19 |
1.7% |
0.016652060 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
145 |
12.7% |
0.127081507 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
182 |
16.0% |
0.159509202 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
105 |
9.2% |
0.092024540 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
371 |
32.5% |
0.325153374 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
295 |
25.9% |
0.258545136 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008764242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom3a_1
|
Variable label:
|
What you do when you’re with several people and they discuss politics
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What do you usually do when you…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… are with several people (such as friends, family or colleagues) and
they discuss politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Join the conversation |
802 |
70.3% |
0.702892200 |
| 2 |
Pay close attention |
127 |
11.1% |
0.111305872 |
| 3 |
Follow along |
185 |
16.2% |
0.162138475 |
| 4 |
Are not interested |
18 |
1.6% |
0.015775635 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007887818 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom3a_2
|
Variable label:
|
What you do when people discuss politics online
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What do you usually do when you…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… see people discussing politics online (for example, on social media,
in comment sections or on discussion forums)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Join the conversation |
32 |
2.8% |
0.02804557 |
| 2 |
Pay close attention |
150 |
13.1% |
0.13146363 |
| 3 |
Follow along |
588 |
51.5% |
0.51533742 |
| 4 |
Are not interested |
358 |
31.4% |
0.31375986 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
1.1% |
0.01139351 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom3b_1
|
Variable label:
|
How often you discuss political topics online
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…do you discuss political topics online?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Daily |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01402279 |
| 2 |
A few times a week |
18 |
1.6% |
0.01577564 |
| 3 |
Weekly |
25 |
2.2% |
0.02191060 |
| 4 |
A few times a month |
71 |
6.2% |
0.06222612 |
| 5 |
A few times a year |
102 |
8.9% |
0.08939527 |
| 6 |
Once a year |
60 |
5.3% |
0.05258545 |
| 7 |
Less than once a year/never |
835 |
73.2% |
0.73181420 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01226994 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom3b_2
|
Variable label:
|
How often you discuss political topics with friends
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…do you discuss political topics with friends?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Daily |
38 |
3.3% |
0.033304119 |
| 2 |
A few times a week |
133 |
11.7% |
0.116564417 |
| 3 |
Weekly |
249 |
21.8% |
0.218229623 |
| 4 |
A few times a month |
405 |
35.5% |
0.354951797 |
| 5 |
A few times a year |
229 |
20.1% |
0.200701139 |
| 6 |
Once a year |
29 |
2.5% |
0.025416301 |
| 7 |
Less than once a year/never |
49 |
4.3% |
0.042944785 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007887818 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom3b_3
|
Variable label:
|
How often you discuss political topics with family
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…do you discuss political topics with members of your family?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Daily |
156 |
13.7% |
0.136722174 |
| 2 |
A few times a week |
189 |
16.6% |
0.165644172 |
| 3 |
Weekly |
296 |
25.9% |
0.259421560 |
| 4 |
A few times a month |
276 |
24.2% |
0.241893076 |
| 5 |
A few times a year |
148 |
13.0% |
0.129710780 |
| 6 |
Once a year |
26 |
2.3% |
0.022787029 |
| 7 |
Less than once a year/never |
39 |
3.4% |
0.034180543 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.0% |
0.009640666 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom3b_4
|
Variable label:
|
How often you search for information about political topics online
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…do you search for information about political topics online?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Daily |
186 |
16.3% |
0.163014899 |
| 2 |
A few times a week |
159 |
13.9% |
0.139351446 |
| 3 |
Weekly |
199 |
17.4% |
0.174408414 |
| 4 |
A few times a month |
217 |
19.0% |
0.190184049 |
| 5 |
A few times a year |
145 |
12.7% |
0.127081507 |
| 6 |
Once a year |
45 |
3.9% |
0.039439089 |
| 7 |
Less than once a year/never |
179 |
15.7% |
0.156879930 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.0% |
0.009640666 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom3c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Tend to agree/disagree when discussing politics online
|
|
Literal question:
|
When you discuss politics with others online, would you say that you
tend to…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 (Always agree) |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001752848 |
| 2 |
2 |
12 |
1.1% |
0.010517090 |
| 3 |
3 |
37 |
3.2% |
0.032427695 |
| 4 |
4 |
178 |
15.6% |
0.156003506 |
| 5 |
5 |
53 |
4.6% |
0.046450482 |
| 6 |
6 |
19 |
1.7% |
0.016652060 |
| 7 |
7 (Never agree) |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002629273 |
| 8 |
Not applicable |
817 |
71.6% |
0.716038563 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.8% |
0.017528484 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom3c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Tend to agree/disagree when discussing politics with friends
|
|
Literal question:
|
When you discuss politics with friends, would you say that you tend to…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 (Always agree) |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008764242 |
| 2 |
2 |
94 |
8.2% |
0.0823838738 |
| 3 |
3 |
299 |
26.2% |
0.2620508326 |
| 4 |
4 |
548 |
48.0% |
0.4802804557 |
| 5 |
5 |
72 |
6.3% |
0.0631025416 |
| 6 |
6 |
9 |
0.8% |
0.0078878177 |
| 7 |
7 (Never agree) |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008764242 |
| 8 |
Not applicable |
107 |
9.4% |
0.0937773883 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.0087642419 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom3c_3
|
Variable label:
|
Tend to agree/disagree when discussing politics with family
|
|
Literal question:
|
When you discuss politics with members of your family, would you say
that you tend to…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 (Always agree) |
16 |
1.4% |
0.014022787 |
| 2 |
2 |
185 |
16.2% |
0.162138475 |
| 3 |
3 |
283 |
24.8% |
0.248028046 |
| 4 |
4 |
442 |
38.7% |
0.387379492 |
| 5 |
5 |
104 |
9.1% |
0.091148116 |
| 6 |
6 |
13 |
1.1% |
0.011393514 |
| 7 |
7 (Never agree) |
4 |
0.4% |
0.003505697 |
| 8 |
Not applicable |
85 |
7.4% |
0.074496056 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007887818 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom3c_4
|
Variable label:
|
Tend to agree/disagree with political information online
|
|
Literal question:
|
When you search for political information online, would you say that you
tend to agree or disagree with the information you find?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 (Always agree) |
2 |
0.2% |
0.0017528484 |
| 2 |
2 |
36 |
3.2% |
0.0315512708 |
| 3 |
3 |
162 |
14.2% |
0.1419807187 |
| 4 |
4 |
515 |
45.1% |
0.4513584575 |
| 5 |
5 |
76 |
6.7% |
0.0666082384 |
| 6 |
6 |
13 |
1.1% |
0.0113935145 |
| 7 |
7 (Never agree) |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008764242 |
| 8 |
Not applicable |
323 |
28.3% |
0.2830850131 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
1.1% |
0.0113935145 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11586 |
|
NA |
r18polkom4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Whether [r18polkom_background2] should be allowed to rent community
centres in my local area to hold meetings
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r18polkom_background2] should be allowed to rent community centres in
my local area to hold meetings for their members and sympathisers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 1 and answered r18polkom_background1-3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12727] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
361 |
31.6% |
0.316389132 |
| 2 |
Agree |
417 |
36.5% |
0.365468887 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
55 |
4.8% |
0.048203330 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
223 |
19.5% |
|
