Codebook

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Round 19

v-102 - 2023-11-06









Produced by ideas2evidence










Citation

Primary investigators

Name Affiliation
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten UiB
Stefan Dahlberg UiB
Erla Løvseth UiB
Hege Høivik Bye UiB
Lise Lund Bjånesøy UiB
Gisela Böhm UiB
Rouven Doran UiB
Dag Elgesem UiB
Thea Gregersen UiB
Anne Lise Fimreite UiB
Arjan Schakel UiB
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø NORCE
Yvette Peters UiB
Bjørn Sætrevik UiB

Scientific committee for KODEM

Name Affiliaton
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten UiB
Anne Lise Fimreite UiB
Rune Karlsen UiO
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø NORCE
Johannes Bergh ISF
Jarle Trondal UiA

Responsible for KODEM-panels

Panel Name
NMP Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
NRP Yvette Peters
NJP Erik Knudsen
NFP Jarle Trondal, Tobias Bach, Jacob Aars

Coordinating team

Name
Erla Løvseth
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
Soran Hajo Dahl

Producers

Name Affiliation Role
Øivind Skjervheim ideas2evidence Coordinator
Olav Bjørnebekk ideas2evidence Project team member
Amund Eikrem ideas2evidence Project team member
Joachim Wettergreen ideas2evidence Project team member
Asle Høgestøl ideas2evidence Quality assurance

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year.

Data collection in wave 19 differs slightly from previous iterations of the survey. Some of the questions are part of coordinated surveys (“KODEM”) which also gathers information about beliefs and convictions of elected representatives (uib.no/NRP), government employees (uib.no/NFP), and from journalists and editors (uib.no/NJP). This mode of data collection enables innovative research of groups that together comprise the political body in Norway.

The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at uib.no/medborger

Scope

Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Universe: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in seven waves:
In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1).
In wave 3, 5 623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3).
In wave 8, 4 245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8).
In wave 11, 2 069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11).
In wave 14, 2 036 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 14).
In wave 16, 5 163 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 16).
In wave 18, 2 048 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 18).

In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry, while in wave 8 the gross sample amounted to 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, 14, and 18, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. In wave 16, the gross sample was 34 000.

This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.

The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.

Mode of Data Collection

The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from previous waves: https://nsd.no/nsddata/serier/norsk_medborgerpanel_eng.html

In wave 19, emails were sent out on 2nd of November, 2020.

An e-mail with reminder was sent out three times, November 10th, November 13th, and November 19th, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message. Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by e-mail.

Wave 19 ended November 27th 2020.

Weighting

To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire.

Two different weights have been calculated:

When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.

We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.

Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.


Change Log

Version Release date / Date changed Variable Changes and notes
v-102 2023-11-06 NA Revised release of round 19
NA 2023-10-25 r19Weight4 New variable: Added r19Weight4
NA 2023-10-25 r19Weight4 Variable documentation inserted
v-103 2023-10-25 NA Revised release of round 19
v-102 2022-02-02 NA Revised release of round 19
NA 2021-05-12 r19pk204_kodet New variable: New version of r19pk204 that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-05-12 r19pk204_kodet Variable documentation inserted
v-101 2021-02-11 NA Revised release of round 19
NA 2021-02-10 r19pktilfreds3 Variable documentation updated
NA 2021-02-03 r19P3_2 New variable: Constituency of parliament election 2021
NA 2021-02-03 r19P3_2 Variable documentation inserted
v-100 2020-12-17 NA Initial release of round 19


Dataset contents

File name Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 19 - v-102-O.sav
Distribution type Public
# Cases 12460
# Variables 403


Variable Documentation

responseid


Variable label: responseid
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19rekruttert


Variable label: [The wave the respondent was recruited]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-18]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Round 1 1763 14.1% 0.14149278
3 Round 3 1921 15.4% 0.15417335
8 Round 8 1832 14.7% 0.14703050
11 Round 11 1074 8.6% 0.08619583
14 Round 14 1161 9.3% 0.09317817
16 Round 16 3273 26.3% 0.26268058
18 Round 18 1436 11.5% 0.11524880


r19group


Variable label: [Partially randomized. If r18group==6 the respondent is assigned to group 4, otherwise randomly assigned to one of the remaining groups]
Technical description: [Partially randomized. If r18group==6 the respondent is assigned to group 4, otherwise randomly assigned to one of the remaining groups]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group 1 1996 16.0% 0.1601926
2 Group 2 1992 16.0% 0.1598716
3 Group 3 2022 16.2% 0.1622793
4 Group 4 2533 20.3% 0.2032905
5 Group 5 1895 15.2% 0.1520867
6 Group 6 2022 16.2% 0.1622793


r19interview_start


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19interview_end


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11665] [Invalid:795] [Range:-]



r19browsertype


Variable label: [Browertype used by respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19browserversion


Variable label: [Browser version used by respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19mobil


Variable label: [Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Mobile 5534 44.4% 0.4441413
0 Other 6926 55.6% 0.5558587


r19opplosning


Variable label: [Screen resolution of the applied device]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19enhetstype


Variable label: [Determines respondents device type]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 PC 7080 56.8% 0.568218299
2 Touch 5342 42.9% 0.428731942
3 Generic 38 0.3% 0.003049759


r19advancedwifeaturesenabled


Variable label: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19getrenderingmode


Variable label: [Detects the browsers rendering mode]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19pk12


Variable label: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament?
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 18 & r19group = 1,2,3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 132 15.2% 0.151549943
2 To a great extent 506 58.1% 0.580941447
3 To some extent 187 21.5% 0.214695752
4 To a small extent 29 3.3% 0.033295063
5 Not at all 13 1.5% 0.014925373
97 Not answered 4 0.5% 0.004592423
98 Not asked 11589 NA


r19pk15


Variable label: Most people in general can be trusted/ cannot be careful enough when dealing with others
Literal question: Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 18 & r19group = 1,2,3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Cannot be careful enough 7 0.8% 0.008036739
1 1 3 0.3% 0.003444317
2 2 11 1.3% 0.012629162
3 3 20 2.3% 0.022962113
4 4 34 3.9% 0.039035591
5 5 67 7.7% 0.076923077
6 6 101 11.6% 0.115958668
7 7 209 24.0% 0.239954076
8 8 238 27.3% 0.273249139
9 9 104 11.9% 0.119402985
10 10 – Most people can be trusted 74 8.5% 0.084959816
97 Not answered 3 0.3% 0.003444317
98 Not asked 11589 NA


r19pktilfreds3


Variable label: How satisfied with the present government in Norway
Literal question: How satisfied with the present government in Norway
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 18 & r19group = 1,2,3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 60 6.9% 0.068886338
2 Satisfied 319 36.6% 0.366245695
3 Somewhat satisfied 272 31.2% 0.312284730
4 Dissatisfied 164 18.8% 0.188289323
5 Not satisfied at all 51 5.9% 0.058553387
97 Not answered 5 0.6% 0.005740528
98 Not asked 11589 NA


r19pk204


Variable label: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1,2,3,4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 247 2.9% 0.028912560
2 The Conservative Party 1898 22.2% 0.222170198
3 The Progressive Party 609 7.1% 0.071286433
4 The Liberal Party 266 3.1% 0.031136603
5 The Socialist Left Party 757 8.9% 0.088610558
6 The Centre Party 1450 17.0% 0.169729603
7 The Green Party 517 6.1% 0.060517383
8 The Labour Party 1547 18.1% 0.181083928
9 The Red Party 443 5.2% 0.051855320
10 Would not vote 140 1.6% 0.016387686
11 Would cast a blank vote 192 2.2% 0.022474541
12 Not entitled to vote 179 2.1% 0.020952827
13 Other: 258 3.0% 0.030200164
97 Not answered 40 0.5% 0.004682196
98 Not asked 3917 NA


r19pk204_kodet


Variable label: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow [coded]
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description:

[Spurt dersom r19group = 1,2,3,4]

[Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert]

[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]

[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 247 2.9% 0.028912560
2 The Conservative Party 1898 22.2% 0.222170198
3 The Progressive Party 609 7.1% 0.071286433
4 The Liberal Party 267 3.1% 0.031253658
5 The Socialist Left Party 757 8.9% 0.088610558
6 The Centre Party 1450 17.0% 0.169729603
7 The Green Party 517 6.1% 0.060517383
8 The Labour Party 1547 18.1% 0.181083928
9 The Red Party 443 5.2% 0.051855320
10 Would not vote 140 1.6% 0.016387686
11 Would cast a blank vote 192 2.2% 0.022474541
12 Not entitled to vote 179 2.1% 0.020952827
13 Other: 257 3.0% 0.030083109
97 Not answered 40 0.5% 0.004682196
98 Not asked 3917 NA


r19pk204_13_other


Variable label: Open: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
Pre-question text: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Literal question: Other:
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1,2,3,4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19pkdv5


Variable label: How great an advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
Literal question: In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very great advantage 73 3.7% 0.03664659
2 Great advantage 371 18.6% 0.18624498
3 Slightly advantageous 733 36.8% 0.36797189
4 Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage 337 16.9% 0.16917671
5 A slight disadvantage 323 16.2% 0.16214859
6 A great disadvantage 97 4.9% 0.04869478
7 Very great disadvantage 48 2.4% 0.02409639
97 Not answered 10 0.5% 0.00502008
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19tdr8_a


Variable label: Would vote for which party if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow
Literal question: Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 75 3.7% 0.037091988
2 The Conservative Party 455 22.5% 0.225024728
3 The Progressive Party 110 5.4% 0.054401583
4 The Liberal Party 67 3.3% 0.033135509
5 The Socialist Left Party 159 7.9% 0.078635015
6 The Centre Party 281 13.9% 0.138971316
7 The Green Party 146 7.2% 0.072205737
8 The Labour Party 416 20.6% 0.205736894
9 The Red Party 98 4.8% 0.048466864
10 The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) 16 0.8% 0.007912957
11 A joint party list 3 0.1% 0.001483680
12 A local list 37 1.8% 0.018298714
13 I would cast a blank vote 39 1.9% 0.019287834
14 I would not vote 49 2.4% 0.024233432
15 I do not have the right to vote 5 0.2% 0.002472799
16 Other: 54 2.7% 0.026706231
97 Not answered 12 0.6% 0.005934718
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdr8_a_16_other


Variable label: Open: Would vote for which party if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow
Pre-question text: Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Literal question: Other:
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19tdr8_b


Variable label: Would vote for which party if county council elections were to take place tomorrow
Literal question: Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 76 3.8% 0.037586548
2 The Conservative Party 413 20.4% 0.204253215
3 The Progressive Party 111 5.5% 0.054896142
4 The Liberal Party 63 3.1% 0.031157270
5 The Socialist Left Party 156 7.7% 0.077151335
6 The Centre Party 300 14.8% 0.148367953
7 The Green Party 129 6.4% 0.063798220
8 The Labour Party 395 19.5% 0.195351137
9 The Red Party 99 4.9% 0.048961424
10 The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) 15 0.7% 0.007418398
11 A joint party list 3 0.1% 0.001483680
12 A local list 12 0.6% 0.005934718
13 I would cast a blank vote 61 3.0% 0.030168150
14 I would not vote 105 5.2% 0.051928783
15 I do not have the right to vote 14 0.7% 0.006923838
16 Other: 51 2.5% 0.025222552
97 Not answered 19 0.9% 0.009396637
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdr8_b_16_other


Variable label: Open: Would vote for which party if county council elections were to take place tomorrow
Pre-question text: Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Literal question: Other:
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19_psykpr_1


Variable label: How high risk that: you will become infected by the coronavirus
Pre-question text: How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak…
Literal question: … you will become infected by the coronavirus?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very low 339 13.4% 0.133833399
2 Somewhat low 903 35.6% 0.356494276
3 Medium 956 37.7% 0.377418081
4 Somewhat high 269 10.6% 0.106198184
5 Very high 56 2.2% 0.022108172
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.003947888
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19_psykpr_2


Variable label: How high risk that: an average adult in Norway will become infected
Pre-question text: How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak…
Literal question: … an average adult in Norway will become infected?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very low 91 3.6% 0.03592578
2 Somewhat low 633 25.0% 0.24990130
3 Medium 1253 49.5% 0.49467035
4 Somewhat high 444 17.5% 0.17528622
5 Very high 81 3.2% 0.03197789
97 Not answered 31 1.2% 0.01223845
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19_psykpr_3


Variable label: How high risk that: your everyday life will change a lot during the outbreak
Pre-question text: How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak…
Literal question: … your everyday life will change a lot from the way it is today?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very low 246 9.7% 0.09711804
2 Somewhat low 668 26.4% 0.26371891
3 Medium 871 34.4% 0.34386103
4 Somewhat high 580 22.9% 0.22897750
5 Very high 140 5.5% 0.05527043
97 Not answered 28 1.1% 0.01105409
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19_psykpr_4


Variable label: How high risk that: you will become seriously ill
Pre-question text: How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak…
Literal question: … you will become seriously ill?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very low 612 24.2% 0.24161074
2 Somewhat low 939 37.1% 0.37070667
3 Medium 651 25.7% 0.25700750
4 Somewhat high 247 9.8% 0.09751283
5 Very high 57 2.3% 0.02250296
97 Not answered 27 1.1% 0.01065930
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykc1_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I worry that I will get infected by the coronavirus
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: I worry that I will get infected by the coronavirus.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 283 11.2% 0.111725227
2 Disagree 684 27.0% 0.270035531
3 Neither agree nor disagree 674 26.6% 0.266087643
4 Agree 769 30.4% 0.303592578
5 Completely agree 114 4.5% 0.045005922
97 Not answered 9 0.4% 0.003553099
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykc1_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I worry that someone in my family will get infected by the coronavirus
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: I worry that someone in my family will get infected by the coronavirus.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 102 4.0% 0.040268456
2 Disagree 365 14.4% 0.144097908
3 Neither agree nor disagree 475 18.8% 0.187524674
4 Agree 1190 47.0% 0.469798658
5 Completely agree 388 15.3% 0.153178050
97 Not answered 13 0.5% 0.005132254
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykre_1


Variable label: The last two weeks I have: been close to others in connection with work/school
Pre-question text: The last two weeks I have…
Literal question: been close to others in connection with work, school, or studies (for example in public transport to work/school, customer contact, open-plan office, lunch room, classroom, reading room)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 351 13.9% 0.138570865
2 Daily 374 14.8% 0.147651007
3 Less than daily 688 27.2% 0.271614686
4 Almost never 1100 43.4% 0.434267667
97 Not answered 20 0.8% 0.007895776
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykre_2


Variable label: The last two weeks I have: been close to others during leisure time
Pre-question text: The last two weeks I have…
Literal question: been close to others during leisure time (such as buying groceries, other shops, restaurants or pubs, visiting the doctor, dentist, hairdresser or similar)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 31 1.2% 0.012238452
2 Daily 332 13.1% 0.131069878
3 Less than daily 1631 64.4% 0.643900513
4 Almost never 528 20.8% 0.208448480
97 Not answered 11 0.4% 0.004342677
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykre_3


Variable label: The last two weeks I have: generally been exposed to infection
Pre-question text: The last two weeks I have…
Literal question: generally been in situations that expose me to infection
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 114 4.5% 0.045005922
2 Daily 416 16.4% 0.164232136
3 Less than daily 1178 46.5% 0.465061192
4 Almost never 813 32.1% 0.320963285
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.004737465
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykc2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I will deal with the challenges that I will face due to the coronavirus outbreak
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: I am optimistic that I will deal with the challenges that I will face due to the coronavirus outbreak.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 37 1.5% 0.01460719
2 Disagree 57 2.3% 0.02250296
3 Neither agree nor disagree 434 17.1% 0.17133833
4 Agree 1499 59.2% 0.59178839
5 Completely agree 498 19.7% 0.19660482
97 Not answered 8 0.3% 0.00315831
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_trust_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I have confidence in the way national authorities are handling the coronavirus pandemic
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: I have confidence in the way national authorities are handling and are prepared to tackle the coronavirus pandemic.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 54 2.1% 0.021318595
2 Disagree 122 4.8% 0.048164232
3 Neither agree nor disagree 271 10.7% 0.106987762
4 Agree 1424 56.2% 0.562179234
5 Completely agree 658 26.0% 0.259771023
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001579155
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_trust_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I have confidence in the way my municipality and the local health services are handling the coronavirus pandemic
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: I have confidence in the way my municipality and the local health services are handling and are prepared to tackle the coronavirus pandemic.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 48 1.9% 0.018949862
2 Disagree 115 4.5% 0.045400711
3 Neither agree nor disagree 332 13.1% 0.131069878
4 Agree 1482 58.5% 0.585076984
5 Completely agree 549 21.7% 0.216739045
97 Not answered 7 0.3% 0.002763522
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_raad_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19cov_raad]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19cov_raad]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2530] [Invalid:9930] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 there is a serious outbreak of infection in the area where you live among people in the same life situation as you, and that you will be safer if you follow all infection control advice 627 24.8% 0.2478261
2 there is a serious outbreak of infection in the area where you live among people in the same life situation as you, and that it is important that you follow all infection control advice in order to stop the outbreak 601 23.8% 0.2375494
3 only a few people are infected in the area where you live among those in the same life situation as you, and that you will be much safer if you follow all infection control advice 658 26.0% 0.2600791
4 only a few people are infected in the area where you live among people in the same life situation as you, and that it is important that you follow all infection control advice in order to stop the outbreak 644 25.5% 0.2545455
Sysmiss 9930 NA


r19cov_raad


Variable label: Whether you would follow the measures if [r19cov_raad_ran]
Pre-question text: Imagine that the health authorities inform people that [there is a serious outbreak of infection in the area where you live among people in the same life situation as you, and that you will be safer if you follow all infection control advice / there is a serious outbreak of infection in the area where you live among people in the same life situation as you, and that it is important that you follow all infection control advice in order to stop the outbreak / only a few people are infected in the area where you live among those in the same life situation as you, and that you will be much safer if you follow all infection control advice / only a few people are infected in the area where you live among people in the same life situation as you, and that it is important that you follow all infection control advice in order to stop the outbreak].
Literal question: How certain are you that you would follow the measures in such a situation?
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19cov_raad_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I am absolutely certain that I would always follow the measures 1073 42.4% 0.423608370
2 I am quite certain that I would always follow the measures 1060 41.8% 0.418476115
3 I think that I would always follow the measures 315 12.4% 0.124358468
4 I don’t really know whether I would follow the measures 49 1.9% 0.019344651
5 I don’t think I would follow the measures 10 0.4% 0.003947888
6 I am quite certain that I would not follow the measures 10 0.4% 0.003947888
7 I am absolutely certain that I would not follow the measures 8 0.3% 0.003158310
97 Not answered 8 0.3% 0.003158310
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_tiltak_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19cov_tiltak]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19cov_tiltak]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2529] [Invalid:9931] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 recommend that everyone should wear a face mask when using crowded public transport 612 24.2% 0.2419929
2 recommend that everyone should wear a face mask in all public indoor locations, and when using public transport 614 24.3% 0.2427837
3 make it compulsory by law that everyone must wear a face mask when using crowded public transport 651 25.7% 0.2574140
4 make it compulsory by law that everyone must wear a face mask in all public indoor locations 652 25.8% 0.2578094
Sysmiss 9931 NA


r19cov_tiltak


Variable label: Whether you would wear a face mask if [r19cov_tiltak_ran]
Pre-question text: Imagine that the health authorities at a given point in time [recommend that everyone should wear a face mask when using crowded public transport / recommend that everyone should wear a face mask in all public indoor locations, and when using public transport / make it compulsory by law that everyone must wear a face mask when using crowded public transport / make it compulsory by law that everyone must wear a face mask in all public indoor locations].
Literal question: How certain are you that you would wear a face mask in such a situation?
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19cov_tiltak_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I am absolutely certain that I would always wear a face mask in accordance with health authority recommendations 1774 70.0% 0.700355310
2 I am quite certain that I would always wear a face mask in accordance with health authority recommendations 521 20.6% 0.205684959
3 I think that I would always wear a face mask in accordance with health authority recommendations 126 5.0% 0.049743387
4 I don’t really know whether I would wear a face mask or not 45 1.8% 0.017765495
5 I don’t think that I would wear a face mask in accordance with health authority recommendations 20 0.8% 0.007895776
6 I am quite certain that I would not wear a face mask in accordance with health authority recommendations 14 0.6% 0.005527043
7 I am absolutely certain that I would not wear a face mask in accordance with health authority recommendations 20 0.8% 0.007895776
97 Not answered 13 0.5% 0.005132254
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I do my best to follow the health authorities’ advice to limit the risk of infection
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: I do my best to follow the health authorities’ advice to limit the risk of infection (wash my hands frequently, avoid travel and situations involving contact with other people, keep distance and avoid touching things).
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 119 4.7% 0.046979866
2 Disagree 14 0.6% 0.005527043
3 Neither agree nor disagree 59 2.3% 0.023292538
4 Agree 1014 40.0% 0.400315831
5 Completely agree 1319 52.1% 0.520726411
97 Not answered 8 0.3% 0.003158310
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19cov_psykac_1]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19cov_psykac_1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2528] [Invalid:9932] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 from all strangers 1274 50.4% 0.5039557
2 those who are not members of my closest family 1254 49.6% 0.4960443
Sysmiss 9932 NA


r19cov_psykac_1


Variable label: The last two weeks I have: washed my hands every time I have been out
Pre-question text: The last two weeks I have…
Literal question: …washed my hands every time I have been out
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Always 1478 58.3% 0.5834978287
2 Almost always 759 30.0% 0.2996446901
3 Often 204 8.1% 0.0805369128
4 Sometimes 68 2.7% 0.0268456376
5 Rarely 14 0.6% 0.0055270430
6 Almost never 2 0.1% 0.0007895776
7 Never 3 0.1% 0.0011843664
97 Not answered 5 0.2% 0.0019739439
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac_2


Variable label: The last two weeks I have: kept a distance of 1 metre [from all strangers/those who are not members of my closest family]
Pre-question text: The last two weeks I have…
Literal question: …kept a distance of 1 metre [from all strangers/those who are not members of my closest family]
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19cov_psykac_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Always 903 35.6% 0.356494276
2 Almost always 1268 50.1% 0.500592183
3 Often 301 11.9% 0.118831425
4 Sometimes 32 1.3% 0.012633241
5 Rarely 10 0.4% 0.003947888
6 Almost never 5 0.2% 0.001973944
7 Never 3 0.1% 0.001184366
97 Not answered 11 0.4% 0.004342677
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac_3


Variable label: The last two weeks I have: avoided all social situations with strangers
Pre-question text: The last two weeks I have…
Literal question: …avoided all social situations with strangers
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19cov_psykac_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Always 943 37.2% 0.372285827
2 Almost always 885 34.9% 0.349388077
3 Often 470 18.6% 0.185550730
4 Sometimes 144 5.7% 0.056849585
5 Rarely 48 1.9% 0.018949862
6 Almost never 16 0.6% 0.006316621
7 Never 14 0.6% 0.005527043
97 Not answered 13 0.5% 0.005132254
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_1


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: unclear to me what the current advice is
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … it has been unclear to me what the current advice is
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 891 35.2% 0.351756810
2 Disagree 1059 41.8% 0.418081326
3 Neither agree nor disagree 283 11.2% 0.111725227
4 Agree 246 9.7% 0.097118042
5 Completely agree 30 1.2% 0.011843664
97 Not answered 24 0.9% 0.009474931
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_2


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: unclear how my actions affect the risk of infection
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … it has been unclear to me how my actions affect the risk of infection
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 1157 45.7% 0.456770628
2 Disagree 994 39.2% 0.392420055
3 Neither agree nor disagree 250 9.9% 0.098697197
4 Agree 102 4.0% 0.040268456
5 Completely agree 12 0.5% 0.004737465
97 Not answered 18 0.7% 0.007106198
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_3


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: have forgotten to follow the advice given/ been inattentive
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … I have forgotten to follow the advice given, been inattentive, or followed old habits
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 711 28.1% 0.280694828
2 Disagree 1024 40.4% 0.404263719
3 Neither agree nor disagree 350 13.8% 0.138176076
4 Agree 400 15.8% 0.157915515
5 Completely agree 32 1.3% 0.012633241
97 Not answered 16 0.6% 0.006316621
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_4


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: don’t think the advice necessarily protects from infection
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … I don’t think the advice necessarily protects people from infection
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 1421 56.1% 0.560994868
2 Disagree 854 33.7% 0.337149625
3 Neither agree nor disagree 137 5.4% 0.054086064
4 Agree 75 3.0% 0.029609159
5 Completely agree 28 1.1% 0.011054086
97 Not answered 18 0.7% 0.007106198
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_5


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: grown tired of following the infection control advice
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … I have grown tired of following the infection control advice
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 1061 41.9% 0.418870904
2 Disagree 976 38.5% 0.385313857
3 Neither agree nor disagree 271 10.7% 0.106987762
4 Agree 173 6.8% 0.068298460
5 Completely agree 34 1.3% 0.013422819
97 Not answered 18 0.7% 0.007106198
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_6


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: I get the impression that others do not follow the advice
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … I get the impression that others do not follow the advice
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 472 18.6% 0.186340308
2 Disagree 715 28.2% 0.282273983
3 Neither agree nor disagree 730 28.8% 0.288195815
4 Agree 509 20.1% 0.200947493
5 Completely agree 94 3.7% 0.037110146
97 Not answered 13 0.5% 0.005132254
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_7


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: have wanted to visit/socialise with friends/family
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … I have wanted to visit or socialise with friends, acquaintances or family/relations
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 422 16.7% 0.166600869
2 Disagree 794 31.3% 0.313462298
3 Neither agree nor disagree 449 17.7% 0.177260166
4 Agree 702 27.7% 0.277141729
5 Completely agree 144 5.7% 0.056849585
97 Not answered 22 0.9% 0.008685353
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_arbeidsgiver


Variable label: My employer/school has facilitated in a way that makes it easy for me to comply with infection control advice
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question: My employer, school or place of study has facilitated in a way that makes it easy for me to comply with infection control advice.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 63 2.5% 0.02487169
2 Disagree 122 4.8% 0.04816423
3 Neither agree nor disagree 245 9.7% 0.09672325
4 Agree 600 23.7% 0.23687327
5 Completely agree 611 24.1% 0.24121595
6 Not applicable in my situation 867 34.2% 0.34228188
97 Not answered 25 1.0% 0.00986972
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac3


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Difficult to follow the infection control advice as well as I would like
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: It can be difficult to follow the advice relating to the control of communicable diseases as well as I would like
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 410 16.2% 0.161863403
2 Disagree 970 38.3% 0.382945124
3 Neither agree nor disagree 365 14.4% 0.144097908
4 Agree 666 26.3% 0.262929333
5 Completely agree 106 4.2% 0.041847612
97 Not answered 16 0.6% 0.006316621
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac4_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I follow the infection control advice so not to become ill myself
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: I follow the advice relating to the control of communicable diseases because I am concerned about not becoming ill myself
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 52 2.1% 0.020529017
2 Disagree 133 5.3% 0.052506909
3 Neither agree nor disagree 194 7.7% 0.076589025
4 Agree 1170 46.2% 0.461902882
5 Completely agree 970 38.3% 0.382945124
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.005527043
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac4_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I follow the infection control advice so not to infect others
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: I follow the advice relating to the control of communicable diseases because I am concerned about not infecting others
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 20 0.8% 0.007895776
2 Disagree 5 0.2% 0.001973944
3 Neither agree nor disagree 62 2.4% 0.024476905
4 Agree 977 38.6% 0.385708646
5 Completely agree 1459 57.6% 0.575996842
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.003947888
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19pad1


Variable label: Which political party do you feel closest to?
Pre-question text: Many people prefer a specific political party over a long period of time, even if they occasionally vote for another party.
Literal question: Which political party do you feel closest to?
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Red Party 93 4.7% 0.04659319
2 The Socialist Left Party 202 10.1% 0.10120240
3 The Norwegian Labour Party 525 26.3% 0.26302605
4 The Green Party 87 4.4% 0.04358717
5 The Liberal Party of Norway 96 4.8% 0.04809619
6 The Centre Party 259 13.0% 0.12975952
7 The Christian Democratic Party 85 4.3% 0.04258517
8 The Conservative Party of Norway 438 21.9% 0.21943888
9 The Progress Party 173 8.7% 0.08667335
97 Not answered 38 1.9% 0.01903808
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad2


Variable label: Is there a political party you feel furthest from?
Literal question: And is there a political party you feel furthest from?
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Red Party 458 22.9% 0.22945892
2 The Socialist Left Party 72 3.6% 0.03607214
3 The Norwegian Labour Party 22 1.1% 0.01102204
4 The Green Party 288 14.4% 0.14428858
5 The Liberal Party of Norway 32 1.6% 0.01603206
6 The Centre Party 33 1.7% 0.01653307
7 The Christian Democratic Party 169 8.5% 0.08466934
8 The Conservative Party of Norway 44 2.2% 0.02204409
9 The Progress Party 850 42.6% 0.42585170
97 Not answered 28 1.4% 0.01402806
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad1_and_2_back


Variable label: [The respondent has navigated backwards after seeing r19pad3]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1 & r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]

[The respondent has navigated backwards after seeing r19pad3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:27] [Invalid:12433] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The respondent has navigated backwarsds to R19PAD1 and/or R19PAD2 27 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 12433 NA


r19pad1_orginalvalue


Variable label: [Stores respondent’s original/first answer on r19pad1, in case they change their response]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[Stores respondent’s original/first answer on r19pad1, in case they change their response]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1958] [Invalid:10502] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Red Party 93 4.7% 0.04749745
2 The Socialist Left Party 202 10.3% 0.10316650
3 The Norwegian Labour Party 525 26.8% 0.26813075
4 The Green Party 87 4.4% 0.04443309
5 The Liberal Party of Norway 96 4.9% 0.04902962
6 The Centre Party 259 13.2% 0.13227783
7 The Christian Democratic Party 85 4.3% 0.04341164
8 The Conservative Party of Norway 438 22.4% 0.22369765
9 The Progress Party 173 8.8% 0.08835546
Sysmiss 10502 NA


r19pad2_orginalvalue


Variable label: [Stores respondent’s original/first answer on r19pad1, in case they change their response]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[Stores respondent’s original/first answer on r19pad1, in case they change their response]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1968] [Invalid:10492] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Red Party 458 23.3% 0.23272358
2 The Socialist Left Party 72 3.7% 0.03658537
3 The Norwegian Labour Party 23 1.2% 0.01168699
4 The Green Party 288 14.6% 0.14634146
5 The Liberal Party of Norway 31 1.6% 0.01575203
6 The Centre Party 33 1.7% 0.01676829
7 The Christian Democratic Party 169 8.6% 0.08587398
8 The Conservative Party of Norway 44 2.2% 0.02235772
9 The Progress Party 850 43.2% 0.43191057
Sysmiss 10492 NA


r19kmsdg


Variable label: Open: What do you think of when you hear/read ‘UN Sustainable Development Goals’?
Literal question: What do you think of when you hear or read the phrase ‘UN Sustainable Development Goals’?
Post-question: Please write down the first thing you think of. All responses are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1,4]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19km_saneclim_2a


Variable label: What sector do you work in?
Literal question: Do you work in:
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The oil and gas industry 94 4.7% 0.047094188
2 The power industry (excluding oil and gas) 30 1.5% 0.015030060
3 Agriculture 32 1.6% 0.016032064
4 Fishing 9 0.5% 0.004509018
5 The travel and tourism industry 25 1.3% 0.012525050
6 Another sector 1631 81.7% 0.817134269
97 Not answered 175 8.8% 0.087675351
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19km_saneclim_2b


Variable label: How often you see the open sea
Literal question: How often do you see the open sea (for example, from where you live, where you work, when you are travelling, in your spare time)?
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Daily 686 34.4% 0.343687375
2 Weekly 327 16.4% 0.163827655
3 Monthly 369 18.5% 0.184869739
4 A couple of times each year 429 21.5% 0.214929860
5 Once a year 89 4.5% 0.044589178
6 Never 83 4.2% 0.041583166
97 Not answered 13 0.7% 0.006513026
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19km_saneclim_2c


Variable label: How often you go for a walk in the nature close to where you live
Literal question: How often do you go for a walk in nature close to where you live?
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Daily 535 26.8% 0.268036072
2 Weekly 991 49.6% 0.496492986
3 Monthly 309 15.5% 0.154809619
4 A couple of times each year 104 5.2% 0.052104208
5 Once a year 6 0.3% 0.003006012
6 Never 39 2.0% 0.019539078
97 Not answered 12 0.6% 0.006012024
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad3_ran1


Variable label: [Randomly chooses if respondentis asked about party selected on r19pad1 (party closest to) or 19pad2 (party most distant to).]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]

[Randomly chooses if respondentis asked about party selected on r19pad1 (party closest to) or 19pad2 (party most distant to).]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1944] [Invalid:10516] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [Value of R19PAD1] 968 49.8% 0.4979424
2 [Value of R19PAD2] 976 50.2% 0.5020576
Sysmiss 10516 NA


r19pad3_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19pad3]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19pad3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1944] [Invalid:10516] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 402 20.7% 0.2067901
2 In an interview, the politician said it was necessary to utilise such travel expense invoices to make up for money he had spent in connection with his position as a member of the Storting. 380 19.5% 0.1954733
3 In an interview, the politician said he made an unintentional administrative error when filling out the forms due to the complicated expense management system. 375 19.3% 0.1929012
4 In an interview, the politician said that his work, and what he means to his constituents, is worth much more than the total sum of the travel expenses. 400 20.6% 0.2057613
5 In an interview, the politician said that he was told by his predecessors that this was common practice during their term of office, and he got the impression that this was still the norm. 387 19.9% 0.1990741
Sysmiss 10516 NA


r19pad3


Variable label: Assess politician’s behaviour in situation where false travel bills have been revealed
Pre-question text: Please consider the following hypothetical situation: Last week, various media outlets revealed that a member of the Storting from[r19pad3_ran1] is alleged to have demanded thousands of kroner from the Storting for a number of trips that have never taken place. Apparently, this had been going on for several months. The politician claimed to have made several visits around the country to the party’s local and county committees in connection with his position as a member of the Storting. However, sources dispute the claim that he visited these places during this period. [r19pad3_ran2]
Literal question: What is your assessment of the politician’s behaviour?
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19pad3_ran1 and r19pad3_ran2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very unproblematic 41 2.1% 0.020541082
2 Quite unproblematic 8 0.4% 0.004008016
3 Unproblematic 3 0.2% 0.001503006
4 Neither problematic nor unproblematic 42 2.1% 0.021042084
5 Problematic 165 8.3% 0.082665331
6 Quite problematic 241 12.1% 0.120741483
7 Very problematic 1439 72.1% 0.720941884
97 Not answered 57 2.9% 0.028557114
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad4


Variable label: What is your assessment of politician’s explanation, in situation where false travel have been revealed
Literal question: What is your assessment of the politician’s explanation regarding his behaviour?
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad3_ran2 != 1 & r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very unbelievable 895 58.0% 0.580415045
2 Quite unbelievable 227 14.7% 0.147211414
3 Slightly unbelievable 276 17.9% 0.178988327
4 Neither believable nor unbelievable 89 5.8% 0.057717250
5 Believable 27 1.8% 0.017509728
6 Quite believable 14 0.9% 0.009079118
7 Very believable 3 0.2% 0.001945525
97 Not answered 11 0.7% 0.007133593
98 Not asked 10918 NA


r19pad5_1


Variable label: Should the politician have consequences for false travel bills: No
Pre-question text: Do you think the politician’s actions should have consequences?
Literal question: No, there should not be any consequences for the politician
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 15 0.8% 0.00751503
0 Not selected 1921 96.2% 0.96242485
97 Not answered 60 3.0% 0.03006012
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad5_2


Variable label: Should the politician have consequences for false travel bills: Yes, should pay the money back
Pre-question text: Do you think the politician’s actions should have consequences?
Literal question: Yes, the politician should pay back the money
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1028 51.5% 0.51503006
0 Not selected 908 45.5% 0.45490982
97 Not answered 60 3.0% 0.03006012
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad5_3


Variable label: Should the politician have consequences for false travel bills: Yes, should resign his position/office
Pre-question text: Do you think the politician’s actions should have consequences?
Literal question: Yes, the politician should resign his position/office
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 834 41.8% 0.41783567
0 Not selected 1102 55.2% 0.55210421
97 Not answered 60 3.0% 0.03006012
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad5_4


Variable label: Should the politician have consequences for false travel bills: Yes, should be expelled from the party
Pre-question text: Do you think the politician’s actions should have consequences?
Literal question: Yes, the politician should be expelled from the party
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 300 15.0% 0.15030060
0 Not selected 1636 82.0% 0.81963928
97 Not answered 60 3.0% 0.03006012
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad5_5


Variable label: Should the politician have consequences for false travel bills: Yes, should be criminally prosecuted
Pre-question text: Do you think the politician’s actions should have consequences?
Literal question: Yes, the politician should be criminally prosecuted
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1076 53.9% 0.53907816
0 Not selected 860 43.1% 0.43086172
97 Not answered 60 3.0% 0.03006012
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19km_climlife_1


Variable label: How you relate to making climate-friendly choices in everyday life
Pre-question text: There may be different reasons why people choose or do not choose to make climate-friendly choices in their everyday lives.
Literal question: Which of the descriptions below best suits how you relate to such choices?
Post-question: You may only tick one alternative.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1]

[Asked on the same page as r19km_climlife_1_open]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I always choose the most climate-friendly option 142 7.1% 0.071142285
2 I make climate-friendly choices when it is convenient and reasonable 1598 80.1% 0.800601202
3 I don’t think about the climate when I make my choices 121 6.1% 0.060621242
4 I have given up being concerned about what is climate-friendly 64 3.2% 0.032064128
5 Other 53 2.7% 0.026553106
97 Not answered 18 0.9% 0.009018036
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19km_climlife_1_open


Variable label: Open: How you relate to making climate-friendly choices in everyday life
Literal question: If you have any comments regarding this question, we would like you to write them here.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1]

[Asked on the same page as r19km_climlife_1]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19km_climlife_2


Variable label: Do the authorities facilitate enough to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life?
Pre-question text: Some people believe that the authorities must better facilitate a climate-friendly way of life.
Literal question: Do you think the authorities are facilitating enough in order for you to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life?
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 489 24.5% 0.24498998
2 No 986 49.4% 0.49398798
3 Don't know 501 25.1% 0.25100200
97 Not answered 20 1.0% 0.01002004
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19km_climlife_2a


Variable label: Why you think the authorities facilitate enough to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life
Literal question: We would like to know why you think the authorities are facilitating enough in order for you to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life.
Post-question: Tick the alternative that suits you best. You may only tick one alternative.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19km_climlife_2 = 1 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I receive the facilitation I require 162 33.1% 0.331288344
2 I have to take responsibility for my own choices 315 64.4% 0.644171779
3 Other 9 1.8% 0.018404908
97 Not answered 3 0.6% 0.006134969
98 Not asked 11971 NA


r19km_climlife_2a_3_other


Variable label: Open: Why you think the authorities facilitate enough to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life
Pre-question text: We would like to know why you think the authorities are facilitating enough in order for you to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life.
Literal question: Other
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19km_climlife_2 = 1 & r19group = 1]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19km_climlife_2b_1


Variable label: The authorities are not facilitating enough for climate-friendly choices in the area: Food
Pre-question text: We would like to know the areas in which you think the authorities are not facilitating enough in order for you to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life.
Literal question: Food
Post-question: Please rank the five areas in which you think such choices are facilitated the least. Rank them from 1 to 5, where 1 corresponds to the least amount of facilitation. To rank the options, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description: [Ranking. Asked if r19km_climlife_2 = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 307 31.1% 0.31135903
2 2 230 23.3% 0.23326572
3 3 186 18.9% 0.18864097
4 4 111 11.3% 0.11257606
5 5 79 8.0% 0.08012170
97 Not answered 73 7.4% 0.07403651
98 Not asked 11474 NA


r19km_climlife_2b_2


Variable label: The authorities are not facilitating enough for climate-friendly choices in the area: Transport
Literal question: Transport
Post-question: Please rank the five areas in which you think such choices are facilitated the least. Rank them from 1 to 5, where 1 corresponds to the least amount of facilitation. To rank the options, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description: [Ranking. Asked if r19km_climlife_2 = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 465 47.2% 0.47160243
2 2 272 27.6% 0.27586207
3 3 103 10.4% 0.10446247
4 4 55 5.6% 0.05578093
5 5 35 3.5% 0.03549696
97 Not answered 56 5.7% 0.05679513
98 Not asked 11474 NA


r19km_climlife_2b_3


Variable label: The authorities are not facilitating enough for climate-friendly choices in the area: Housing development
Literal question: Housing development
Post-question: Please rank the five areas in which you think such choices are facilitated the least. Rank them from 1 to 5, where 1 corresponds to the least amount of facilitation. To rank the options, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description: [Ranking. Asked if r19km_climlife_2 = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 126 12.8% 0.12778905
2 2 219 22.2% 0.22210953
3 3 265 26.9% 0.26876268
4 4 181 18.4% 0.18356998
5 5 58 5.9%