Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Mette Andersson, Sveinung Arnesen, Gisela Böhm, Dag Elgesem, Odd Gåsdal,
Kristin Strømsnes, Endre Tvinnereim, and Jacob Aars
|
Scientific Team, University of Bergen and Rokkansenteret
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
The gross sample of wave 2 were the 4 863 panel members who registered
their email address in wave 1. In wave 1 the gross sample were 25 000
individuals above the age of 18 randomly drawn from the Norwegian
Population Registry. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for
the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private
IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel
after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax
Administration.
The sample received from Evry contained the following information: a)
surname, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age. The sample
excluded people with no current home address in Norway. Furthermore, all
individuals over the age of 95 were excluded from the sample. This
amounted to 58 persons, thus leaving a net sample of 24 942 individuals
before the recruitment process started.
Mode of Data Collection
Norwegian Citizen Panel is a web-based survey. Wave 2 recruited
respondents per email among the existing panel members.
The recruitment process was done in several steps. First, all panel
members received an invitation by email. The email contained the
following information; a) description of the projeckt, b) the Citizen
Panel’s policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the anonymity of
the participators, c) contact information for the people responsible for
the project, d) a unique we address to the questionnaire, e) the
estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes), f)
information about the lottery of a travel gift card.
In order to maximize the response rate, an incentive in the form of a
travel gift card was included in the project. The value of the gift card
was 25 000 NOK. To enter the lottery respondents were required to
complete the wave 2 questionnaire. Information on the lottery was
included in all correspondence with respondents.
The invitation was emailed on the 10th of March 2014.
Three reminders were sent at the following dates: 13th of March, 17th of
March, and 20th of March. The reminder was sent to those who a) had not
entered the questionnarie, and b) had not completed the questionnaire.
The respondents were encouraged to participate by referring to the
number of participants and the importance of various topics in the
survey. The unique we address to the questionnaire were also included in
the reminders.
Wave 2 was closed 31st of March 2014.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix).
When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s
geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These
attributes were included in the sample file we received from the
Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of
education is provided by the respondents when answering the
questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer
this question. Because of this, two different weights have been
calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset. We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in
any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate
compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample. An
illustration of this is provided in table 5 which shows the effect of
weight 2 on the distribution of self-reported level of education in the
net sample:
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 2
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
w02_weight4
|
New
variable: Added w02_weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
w02_weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-15
|
W02_P4_2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 2
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
w02_km236
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
w02_km219
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-09
|
w02_dt201
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
w02_k201
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
w02_k203
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2018-11-07
|
w02_k206_1_kod
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
|
NA
|
2018-11-07
|
w02_k206_2_kod
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
|
NA
|
2018-11-07
|
w02_k206_3_kod
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w02_p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w02_p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2017-11-28
|
w02_k206_1-3
|
Added anonymized data and associated coded variables.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
w02p4_1
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
w02p4_2
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2015-05-29
|
w02_k206_1_kod
|
New
variable based on w02_k206_1
|
|
NA
|
2015-05-29
|
w02_k206_2_kod
|
New
variable based on w02_k206_2
|
|
NA
|
2015-05-29
|
w02_k206_3_kod
|
New
variable based on w02_k206_3
|
|
v-100
|
2014-04-11
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 2
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 2 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
3372
|
|
# Variables
|
482
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_u
|
Variable label:
|
u
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
1719 |
51.0% |
0.5097865 |
| 2 |
2 |
1653 |
49.0% |
0.4902135 |
w02_k201
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with current government
|
|
Literal question:
|
First we will ask some general questions on your own opinion of politics
and society in Norway today. How satisfied are you with the current
government?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
152 |
4.5% |
0.045077106 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1242 |
36.8% |
0.368327402 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1170 |
34.7% |
0.346975089 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
611 |
18.1% |
0.181198102 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
188 |
5.6% |
0.055753262 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.3% |
0.002669039 |
w02_k202
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway? Do you
believe it is
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
921 |
27.3% |
0.273131673 |
| 2 |
Good |
1821 |
54.0% |
0.540035587 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
383 |
11.4% |
0.113582444 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
146 |
4.3% |
0.043297746 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
68 |
2.0% |
0.020166074 |
| 6 |
Bad |
13 |
0.4% |
0.003855279 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001186240 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
0.5% |
0.004744958 |
w02_k203
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with democracy
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy
works in Norway?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
676 |
20.0% |
0.200474496 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1942 |
57.6% |
0.575919336 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
580 |
17.2% |
0.172004745 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
143 |
4.2% |
0.042408066 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
21 |
0.6% |
0.006227758 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
0.3% |
0.002965599 |
w02_k204
|
Variable label:
|
Party preference if elections tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
What would you vote if there were an election to the Storting tomorrow?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
979 |
29.0% |
0.290332147 |
| 2 |
The Progress Party |
307 |
9.1% |
0.091043891 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party |
850 |
25.2% |
0.252075919 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
157 |
4.7% |
0.046559905 |
| 5 |
The Centre Party |
91 |
2.7% |
0.026986951 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
137 |
4.1% |
0.040628707 |
| 7 |
The Liberal Party |
223 |
6.6% |
0.066132859 |
| 8 |
Red |
65 |
1.9% |
0.019276394 |
| 9 |
The Green Party |
168 |
5.0% |
0.049822064 |
| 10 |
Other |
34 |
1.0% |
0.010083037 |
| 11 |
Would not vote |
51 |
1.5% |
0.015124555 |
| 12 |
Cannot vote |
84 |
2.5% |
0.024911032 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
0.3% |
0.002965599 |
| 99 |
Don't know |
216 |
6.4% |
0.064056940 |
w02_k204_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Party preference if elections tomorrow [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What would you vote if there were an election to the Storting tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_k205ac_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The state should contribute to reducing income inequalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The state should contribute to reducing inequalities in income in
society.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
645 |
19.1% |
0.191281139 |
| 2 |
Agree |
969 |
28.7% |
0.287366548 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
925 |
27.4% |
0.274317912 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
291 |
8.6% |
0.086298932 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
270 |
8.0% |
0.080071174 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
201 |
6.0% |
0.059608541 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
51 |
1.5% |
0.015124555 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
0.6% |
0.005931198 |
w02_k205ac_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Better if there is a diversity of different religions and
views on life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different
religions and views on life.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
353 |
10.5% |
0.104685647 |
| 2 |
Agree |
862 |
25.6% |
0.255634638 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
767 |
22.7% |
0.227461447 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
434 |
12.9% |
0.128706999 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
434 |
12.9% |
0.128706999 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
314 |
9.3% |
0.093119810 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
177 |
5.2% |
0.052491103 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
0.9% |
0.009193357 |
w02_k205ac_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Emission reductions should be made abroad.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Most of the emission reductions Norway is committed to should be made
abroad.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
125 |
3.7% |
0.03706999 |
| 2 |
Agree |
302 |
9.0% |
0.08956109 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
492 |
14.6% |
0.14590747 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
839 |
24.9% |
0.24881376 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
532 |
15.8% |
0.15776987 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
733 |
21.7% |
0.21737841 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
306 |
9.1% |
0.09074733 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
1.3% |
0.01275208 |
w02_k206_1
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - text [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_k206_1_kod
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - coded
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1001-900906]
|
w02_k206_2
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - text [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_k206_2_kod
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - coded
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1001-900906]
|
w02_k206_3
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - text [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_k206_3_kod
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - coded
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1001-900906]
|
w02_k207_1
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics one often speaks of the “left wing” and “right wing.” Below
is a scale where 0 represents those who are at the far left politically,
while 10 represents those who are at the far right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left |
31 |
0.9% |
0.009193357 |
| 1 |
1 |
69 |
2.0% |
0.020462633 |
| 2 |
2 |
224 |
6.6% |
0.066429419 |
| 3 |
3 |
497 |
14.7% |
0.147390273 |
| 4 |
4 |
424 |
12.6% |
0.125741400 |
| 5 |
5 |
551 |
16.3% |
0.163404508 |
| 6 |
6 |
436 |
12.9% |
0.129300119 |
| 7 |
7 |
579 |
17.2% |
0.171708185 |
| 8 |
8 |
338 |
10.0% |
0.100237248 |
| 9 |
9 |
112 |
3.3% |
0.033214709 |
| 10 |
10 Right |
68 |
2.0% |
0.020166074 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
1.3% |
0.012752076 |
w02_k6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
346 |
10.3% |
0.10260973 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
634 |
18.8% |
0.18801898 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
805 |
23.9% |
0.23873072 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
667 |
19.8% |
0.19780546 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
627 |
18.6% |
0.18594306 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
200 |
5.9% |
0.05931198 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
35 |
1.0% |
0.01037960 |
| 97 |
No answer |
58 |
1.7% |
0.01720047 |
w02_k6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
80 |
2.4% |
0.02372479 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
330 |
9.8% |
0.09786477 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
575 |
17.1% |
0.17052195 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
364 |
10.8% |
0.10794781 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
896 |
26.6% |
0.26571767 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
852 |
25.3% |
0.25266904 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
208 |
6.2% |
0.06168446 |
| 97 |
No answer |
67 |
2.0% |
0.01986951 |
w02_k6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
764 |
22.7% |
0.22657177 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
641 |
19.0% |
0.19009490 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
527 |
15.6% |
0.15628707 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
317 |
9.4% |
0.09400949 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
610 |
18.1% |
0.18090154 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
339 |
10.1% |
0.10053381 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
118 |
3.5% |
0.03499407 |
| 97 |
No answer |
56 |
1.7% |
0.01660735 |
w02_k6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
129 |
3.8% |
0.03825623 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
289 |
8.6% |
0.08570581 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
607 |
18.0% |
0.18001186 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
922 |
27.3% |
0.27342823 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
904 |
26.8% |
0.26809015 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
397 |
11.8% |
0.11773428 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
57 |
1.7% |
0.01690391 |
| 97 |
No answer |
67 |
2.0% |
0.01986951 |
w02_k6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
536 |
15.9% |
0.15895611 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
585 |
17.3% |
0.17348754 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
623 |
18.5% |
0.18475682 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
601 |
17.8% |
0.17823250 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
610 |
18.1% |
0.18090154 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
292 |
8.7% |
0.08659549 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
66 |
2.0% |
0.01957295 |
| 97 |
No answer |
59 |
1.7% |
0.01749703 |
w02_k6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
243 |
7.2% |
0.072064057 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
498 |
14.8% |
0.147686833 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
850 |
25.2% |
0.252075919 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
981 |
29.1% |
0.290925267 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
561 |
16.6% |
0.166370107 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
146 |
4.3% |
0.043297746 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
23 |
0.7% |
0.006820878 |
| 97 |
No answer |
70 |
2.1% |
0.020759193 |
w02_k6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
229 |
6.8% |
0.06791222 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
303 |
9.0% |
0.08985765 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
451 |
13.4% |
0.13374852 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1068 |
31.7% |
0.31672598 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
816 |
24.2% |
0.24199288 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
348 |
10.3% |
0.10320285 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
101 |
3.0% |
0.02995255 |
| 97 |
No answer |
56 |
1.7% |
0.01660735 |
w02_k6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
135 |
4.0% |
0.04003559 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
259 |
7.7% |
0.07680902 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
517 |
15.3% |
0.15332147 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
443 |
13.1% |
0.13137604 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
943 |
28.0% |
0.27965599 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
811 |
24.1% |
0.24051008 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
209 |
6.2% |
0.06198102 |
| 97 |
No answer |
55 |
1.6% |
0.01631079 |
w02_k6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Red
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Red
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
779 |
23.1% |
0.23102017 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
666 |
19.8% |
0.19750890 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
526 |
15.6% |
0.15599051 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
735 |
21.8% |
0.21797153 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
417 |
12.4% |
0.12366548 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
140 |
4.2% |
0.04151839 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
38 |
1.1% |
0.01126928 |
| 97 |
No answer |
71 |
2.1% |
0.02105575 |
w02_k208
|
Variable label:
|
Statements describes view on climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following statements best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Choose one option.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I believe that the climate is not changing. |
29 |
0.9% |
0.008600237 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
224 |
6.6% |
0.066429419 |
| 3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it has little to do with human
action. |
805 |
23.9% |
0.238730724 |
| 4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it to a large extent is due to
human action. |
2293 |
68.0% |
0.680011862 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
0.6% |
0.006227758 |
w02_u1_s
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 into two groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 into two groups (U1-S1 og U1-S2)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1719] [Invalid:1653]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
U1_S1 |
877 |
51.0% |
0.5101803 |
| 2 |
U1_S2 |
842 |
49.0% |
0.4898197 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1653 |
|
NA |
w02_km235
|
Variable label:
|
Proportion of Norway’s population that shares opinion on climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
How great a proportion of Norway’s population do you think shares your
opinion on this matter?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All, or nearly all |
26 |
3.0% |
0.029646522 |
| 2 |
Many (more than half) |
393 |
44.8% |
0.448118586 |
| 3 |
Around half |
299 |
34.1% |
0.340935006 |
| 4 |
Some (fewer than half) |
145 |
16.5% |
0.165336374 |
| 5 |
None, or nearly none |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002280502 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.013683010 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km222
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best climate policy
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like to ask some more questions regarding the climate before
proceeding to other topics. In your opinion, which party has the best
climate policy?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
19 |
2.2% |
0.021664766 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
101 |
11.5% |
0.115165336 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
41 |
4.7% |
0.046750285 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
146 |
16.6% |
0.166476625 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
70 |
8.0% |
0.079817560 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
22 |
2.5% |
0.025085519 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
265 |
30.2% |
0.302166477 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
100 |
11.4% |
0.114025086 |
| 9 |
Red |
7 |
0.8% |
0.007981756 |
| 10 |
Other: |
60 |
6.8% |
0.068415051 |
| 97 |
No answer |
46 |
5.2% |
0.052451539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km222_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Party with the best climate policy [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like to ask some more questions regarding the climate before
proceeding to other topics. In your opinion, which party has the best
climate policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km236
|
Variable label:
|
Concerned are you about climate change [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very concerned |
96 |
10.9% |
0.10946408 |
| 2 |
Concerned |
297 |
33.9% |
0.33865450 |
| 3 |
Somewhat concerned |
316 |
36.0% |
0.36031927 |
| 4 |
Not particularly concerned |
143 |
16.3% |
0.16305587 |
| 5 |
Not at all concerned |
25 |
2.9% |
0.02850627 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 into eight groups and selects one of the following
questions: KM202a - KM202h
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1719] [Invalid:1653]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
218 |
12.7% |
0.1268179 |
| 2 |
2 |
204 |
11.9% |
0.1186736 |
| 3 |
3 |
196 |
11.4% |
0.1140198 |
| 4 |
4 |
242 |
14.1% |
0.1407795 |
| 5 |
5 |
205 |
11.9% |
0.1192554 |
| 6 |
6 |
218 |
12.7% |
0.1268179 |
| 7 |
7 |
200 |
11.6% |
0.1163467 |
| 8 |
8 |
236 |
13.7% |
0.1372891 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1653 |
|
NA |
w02_km202a
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of climate
changes in Norway immediately
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may be expensive,
but they will reduce the risk of experiencing hazardous climate changes
in Norway immediately. To which extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on measures
that reduce the risk of climate changes in Norway immediately.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
14.2% |
0.142201835 |
| 2 |
Agree |
67 |
30.7% |
0.307339450 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
57 |
26.1% |
0.261467890 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
30 |
13.8% |
0.137614679 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
19 |
8.7% |
0.087155963 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
7 |
3.2% |
0.032110092 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
6 |
2.8% |
0.027522936 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004587156 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3154 |
|
NA |
w02_km202b
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of climate
changes in the world immediately
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may be expensive,
but they will reduce the risk of experiencing hazardous climate changes
in the world immediately. To which extent do you agree or disagree with
the following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on
measures that reduce the risk of climate changes in the world
immediately?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
15.2% |
0.15196078 |
| 2 |
Agree |
58 |
28.4% |
0.28431373 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
72 |
35.3% |
0.35294118 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
20 |
9.8% |
0.09803922 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
10 |
4.9% |
0.04901961 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
7 |
3.4% |
0.03431373 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
6 |
2.9% |
0.02941176 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3168 |
|
NA |
w02_km202c
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of climate
changes in Norway in the next 50 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may be expensive,
but they will reduce the risk of experiencing hazardous climate changes
in Norway in 50 years. To which extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on measures
that reduce the risk of climate changes in Norway in 50 years.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
52 |
26.5% |
0.26530612 |
| 2 |
Agree |
62 |
31.6% |
0.31632653 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
42 |
21.4% |
0.21428571 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
24 |
12.2% |
0.12244898 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
7 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
6 |
3.1% |
0.03061224 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01530612 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3176 |
|
NA |
w02_km202d
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of climate
changes in the world in the next 50 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may be expensive,
but they will reduce the risk of experiencing hazardous climate changes
in the world in 50 years. To which extent do you agree or disagree with
the following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on
measures that reduce the risk of climate changes in the world in 50
years?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
57 |
23.6% |
0.235537190 |
| 2 |
Agree |
76 |
31.4% |
0.314049587 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
65 |
26.9% |
0.268595041 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
16 |
6.6% |
0.066115702 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
9 |
3.7% |
0.037190083 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
14 |
5.8% |
0.057851240 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
1.7% |
0.016528926 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004132231 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3130 |
|
NA |
w02_km202e
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of local
air pollution in Norway immediately
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce local air pollution may be expensive, but
they will reduce the risk of experiencing dangerously polluted air in
Norway immediately. To which extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on measures
that reduce the risk of local air pollution in Norway immediately.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
39 |
19.0% |
0.190243902 |
| 2 |
Agree |
73 |
35.6% |
0.356097561 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
59 |
28.8% |
0.287804878 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
19 |
9.3% |
0.092682927 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
8 |
3.9% |
0.039024390 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2 |
1.0% |
0.009756098 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
2.0% |
0.019512195 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004878049 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3167 |
|
NA |
w02_km202f
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of local
air pollution in the world immediately
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce local air pollution may be expensive, but
they will reduce the risk of experiencing dangerously polluted air in
the world immediately. To which extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on measures
that reduce the risk of local air pollution in the world immediately?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
26 |
12.0% |
0.11981567 |
| 2 |
Agree |
56 |
25.8% |
0.25806452 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
70 |
32.3% |
0.32258065 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
25 |
11.5% |
0.11520737 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
23 |
10.6% |
0.10599078 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
10 |
4.6% |
0.04608295 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3155 |
|
NA |
w02_km202g
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of local
air pollution in Norway in the next 50 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce local air pollution may be expensive, but
they will reduce the risk of experiencing dangerously polluted air in
Norway in 50 years. To which extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on measures
that reduce the risk of local air pollution in Norway in 50 years.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
51 |
25.6% |
0.25628141 |
| 2 |
Agree |
81 |
40.7% |
0.40703518 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
42 |
21.1% |
0.21105528 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
10 |
5.0% |
0.05025126 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
9 |
4.5% |
0.04522613 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
4 |
2.0% |
0.02010050 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
2 |
1.0% |
0.01005025 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3173 |
|
NA |
w02_km202h
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of local
air pollution in the world in the next 50 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce local air pollution may be expensive, but
they will reduce the risk of experiencing dangerously polluted air in
the world in 50 years. To which extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on measures
that reduce the risk of local air pollution in the world in 50 years?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
53 |
22.5% |
0.22457627 |
| 2 |
Agree |
85 |
36.0% |
0.36016949 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
52 |
22.0% |
0.22033898 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
23 |
9.7% |
0.09745763 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
11 |
4.7% |
0.04661017 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
7 |
3.0% |
0.02966102 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
2.1% |
0.02118644 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3136 |
|
NA |
w02_km2017
|
Variable label:
|
Will global warming lead to more harmful extreme weather over the next
100 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
If nothing is done to prevent it, do you believe global warming will
lead to more harmful extreme weather over the next 100 years, or do you
believe global warming will not lead to this?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Global warming will lead to more harmful extreme weather |
772 |
88.0% |
0.88027366 |
| 2 |
Global warming will not lead to more harmful extreme weather |
92 |
10.5% |
0.10490308 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.5% |
0.01482326 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km212
|
Variable label:
|
Decision not to carry out an impact assessment of petroleum activity
outside Lofoten and Vesterålen
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you may know, after the election the Solberg government decided that
it would not carry out an impact assessment of petroleum activity
outside Lofoten and Vesterålen in the next four years. In your opinion,
was this a good or bad decision?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
178 |
20.3% |
0.20296465 |
| 2 |
Good |
208 |
23.7% |
0.23717218 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
103 |
11.7% |
0.11744584 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
142 |
16.2% |
0.16191562 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
100 |
11.4% |
0.11402509 |
| 6 |
Bad |
89 |
10.1% |
0.10148233 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
45 |
5.1% |
0.05131129 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01368301 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_1
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: TV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
155 |
17.7% |
0.17673888 |
| 2 |
Important |
377 |
43.0% |
0.42987457 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
176 |
20.1% |
0.20068415 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
94 |
10.7% |
0.10718358 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
46 |
5.2% |
0.05245154 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
3.3% |
0.03306727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_2
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Radio
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Radio
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
78 |
8.9% |
0.08893957 |
| 2 |
Important |
241 |
27.5% |
0.27480046 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
227 |
25.9% |
0.25883694 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
175 |
20.0% |
0.19954390 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
92 |
10.5% |
0.10490308 |
| 97 |
No answer |
64 |
7.3% |
0.07297605 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_3
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: National newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
National newspapers (online and printed)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
132 |
15.1% |
0.15051311 |
| 2 |
Important |
358 |
40.8% |
0.40820981 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
203 |
23.1% |
0.23147092 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
85 |
9.7% |
0.09692132 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
53 |
6.0% |
0.06043330 |
| 97 |
No answer |
46 |
5.2% |
0.05245154 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_4
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Regional or local newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Regional or local newspapers (online and printed)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
44 |
5.0% |
0.05017104 |
| 2 |
Important |
165 |
18.8% |
0.18814139 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
204 |
23.3% |
0.23261117 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
256 |
29.2% |
0.29190422 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
136 |
15.5% |
0.15507412 |
| 97 |
No answer |
72 |
8.2% |
0.08209806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_5
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
36 |
4.1% |
0.04104903 |
| 2 |
Important |
69 |
7.9% |
0.07867731 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
123 |
14.0% |
0.14025086 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
245 |
27.9% |
0.27936146 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
332 |
37.9% |
0.37856328 |
| 97 |
No answer |
72 |
8.2% |
0.08209806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_6
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Blogs or other websites
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Blogs or other websites
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02052452 |
| 2 |
Important |
59 |
6.7% |
0.06727480 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
102 |
11.6% |
0.11630559 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
244 |
27.8% |
0.27822121 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
379 |
43.2% |
0.43215507 |
| 97 |
No answer |
75 |
8.6% |
0.08551881 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_7
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Publications from environmental
organizations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Publications from environmental organizations
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
45 |
5.1% |
0.05131129 |
| 2 |
Important |
177 |
20.2% |
0.20182440 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
241 |
27.5% |
0.27480046 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
176 |
20.1% |
0.20068415 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
173 |
19.7% |
0.19726340 |
| 97 |
No answer |
65 |
7.4% |
0.07411631 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_8
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Reports from the research
communities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reports from the research communities
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
197 |
22.5% |
0.22462942 |
| 2 |
Important |
300 |
34.2% |
0.34207526 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
179 |
20.4% |
0.20410490 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
86 |
9.8% |
0.09806157 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
65 |
7.4% |
0.07411631 |
| 97 |
No answer |
50 |
5.7% |
0.05701254 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_9
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Reports from the authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reports from the authorities
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
91 |
10.4% |
0.10376283 |
| 2 |
Important |
280 |
31.9% |
0.31927024 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
278 |
31.7% |
0.31698974 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
107 |
12.2% |
0.12200684 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
62 |
7.1% |
0.07069555 |
| 97 |
No answer |
59 |
6.7% |
0.06727480 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_10
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, please specify
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02166477 |
| 2 |
Important |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01368301 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
29 |
3.3% |
0.03306727 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
38 |
4.3% |
0.04332953 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
124 |
14.1% |
0.14139111 |
| 97 |
No answer |
655 |
74.7% |
0.74686431 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Other [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, please specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km201a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: None
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
None
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
850 |
96.9% |
0.969213227 |
| 1 |
1 |
26 |
3.0% |
0.029646522 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001140251 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_v
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1 into two groups (U1-S1-V1 og U1-S1-V2) and
selects the following question in pairs: KM216 - KM219
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:876] [Invalid:2496]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
U1S1V1 |
436 |
49.8% |
0.4977169 |
| 2 |
U1S1V2 |
440 |
50.2% |
0.5022831 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2496 |
|
NA |
w02_km216
|
Variable label:
|
Temperature last winter
|
|
Literal question:
|
Has the winter (2013-14) where you live been warmer than normal, colder
than normal, or normal?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Colder |
5 |
1.1% |
0.011467890 |
| 2 |
Normal |
43 |
9.9% |
0.098623853 |
| 3 |
Warmer |
387 |
88.8% |
0.887614679 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002293578 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2936 |
|
NA |
w02_km217
|
Variable label:
|
Temperature last summer
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was the last summer (2013) where you live warmer than normal, colder
than normal, or normal?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Colder |
83 |
18.9% |
0.188636364 |
| 2 |
Normal |
230 |
52.3% |
0.522727273 |
| 3 |
Warmer |
126 |
28.6% |
0.286363636 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002272727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2932 |
|
NA |
w02_km218
|
Variable label:
|
Amount of precipitation last winter
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was there more precipitation, less precipitation or normal precipitation
last winter (2013-14) where you live?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
More precipitation |
191 |
43.8% |
0.43807339 |
| 2 |
Normal precipitation |
108 |
24.8% |
0.24770642 |
| 3 |
Less precipitation |
129 |
29.6% |
0.29587156 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.8% |
0.01834862 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2936 |
|
NA |
w02_km219
|
Variable label:
|
Amount of precipitation last summer [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
When you consider last summer (2013), was there more precipitation, less
precipitation or normal precipitation where you live?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
More precipitation |
123 |
28.0% |
0.279545455 |
| 2 |
Normal precipitation |
204 |
46.4% |
0.463636364 |
| 3 |
Less precipitation |
109 |
24.8% |
0.247727273 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009090909 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2932 |
|
NA |
w02_km220
|
Variable label:
|
Average temperature the past ten years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that the temperature on average has become warmer, colder
or remained about the same in the past ten years?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Warmer |
471 |
53.7% |
0.53705815 |
| 2 |
About the same |
352 |
40.1% |
0.40136830 |
| 3 |
Colder |
39 |
4.4% |
0.04446978 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.7% |
0.01710376 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km221
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: I have myself noticed the consequences of global warming
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree with the statement: “I have myself noticed
the consequences of global warming”
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
47 |
5.4% |
0.053591790 |
| 2 |
Agree |
148 |
16.9% |
0.168757127 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
295 |
33.6% |
0.336374002 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
188 |
21.4% |
0.214367161 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
54 |
6.2% |
0.061573546 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
92 |
10.5% |
0.104903079 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
5.6% |
0.055872292 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004561003 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1 into four groups and selects one of the
following questions: KM2236 - KM2239
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:875] [Invalid:2497]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
209 |
23.9% |
0.2388571 |
| 2 |
2 |
214 |
24.5% |
0.2445714 |
| 3 |
3 |
217 |
24.8% |
0.2480000 |
| 4 |
4 |
235 |
26.9% |
0.2685714 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2497 |
|
NA |
w02_km2236
|
Variable label:
|
Cause of climate change, conversation with someone who does not believe
it is man-made [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of late there has been quite a lot of discussion on climate change. Some
are of the opinion that climate changes are not man-made. Others believe
that human actions cause the climate to change. We ask you to imagine
that you are speaking with some people who do not believe that humans
are responsible for climate change. Imagine that you asked each one of
them why they do not believe that humans cause climate changes. What do
you think they would tell you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please be brief and focus on how you believe they would answer your
question.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km2237
|
Variable label:
|
Cause of climate change, conversation with someone who does believe it
is man-made [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of late there has been quite a lot of discussion on climate change. Some
are of the opinion that climate changes are not man-made. Others believe
that human actions cause the climate to change. We ask you to imagine
that you are speaking with some people who believe that humans are
responsible for climate change. Imagine that you asked each one of them
why they believe that humans cause climate changes. What do you think
they would tell you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please be brief and focus on how you believe they would answer your
question.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km2238
|
Variable label:
|
Cause of climate change, conversation with someone who does believe the
climate is about to change [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of late there has been quite a lot of discussion on climate change. Some
believe that the climate is changing. Others believe that the climate is
not changing.
We ask you to imagine that you are speaking with some people who believe
that the climate is changing. Imagine that you asked each one of them
why they believe that the climate is changing. What do you think they
would tell you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please be brief and focus on how you believe they would answer your
question.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km2239
|
Variable label:
|
Cause of climate change, conversation with someone who does not believe
the climate is about to change [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of late there has been quite a lot of discussion on climate change. Some
believe that the climate is changing. Others believe that the climate is
not changing.
We ask you to imagine that you are speaking with some people who do not
believe that the climate is changing. Imagine that you asked each one of
them why they do not believe that the climate is changing. What do you
think they would tell you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please be brief and focus on how you believe they would answer your
question.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km251
|
Variable label:
|
If the Progress Party supports measures that increase the costs of
emitting greenhouse gases
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, does the Progress Party support measures that increase
the costs of emitting greenhouse gases in Norway?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
242 |
27.6% |
0.27594071 |
| 2 |
No |
551 |
62.8% |
0.62827822 |
| 97 |
No answer |
84 |
9.6% |
0.09578107 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km252
|
Variable label:
|
Heard of the CO2 compensation scheme for Norwegian industry
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard of the CO2 compensation scheme for Norwegian industry?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
423 |
48.2% |
0.48232611 |
| 2 |
No |
424 |
48.3% |
0.48346636 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
3.4% |
0.03420753 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km253
|
Variable label:
|
Supports the CO2 compensation scheme
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you support the CO2 compensation scheme?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
125 |
29.6% |
0.295508274 |
| 2 |
No |
66 |
15.6% |
0.156028369 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.7% |
0.007092199 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2949 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
229 |
54.1% |
0.541371158 |
w02_u1_kommvalg
|
Variable label:
|
A value of 1 for respondents who are registered in one of the following
municipalities: Oslo, Ski, Nesodden, Oppegård, Enebakk, Bærum, Rælingen,
Lørenskog, Skedsmo, Nittedal, Marker, Rømskog, Trøgstad, Spydeberg,
Askim, Eidsberg, Skiptvet, Hobøl, Vestby, Ås, Frogn, Asker, Røyken,
Hurum, Aurskog-Høland, Sørum, Fet, Gjerdrum, Ullensaker, Nes, Eidsvoll,
Nannestad, Hurdal, Lunner, Moss, Råde, Rygge, Våler, Drammen, Øvre
Eiker, Nedre Eiker, Lier, Holmestrand, Svelvik, Sande, Hof, Sandnes,
Stavanger, Hå, Klepp, Time, Gjesdal, Sola, Randaberg, Forsand, Strand,
Finnøy, Rennesøy, Kvitsøy, Bergen, Fusa, Samnanger, Os, Sund, Fjell,
Askøy, Vaksdal, Osterøy, Meland, Øygarden, Radøy, Lindås, Austrheim
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3370] [Invalid:2] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
2472 |
73.4% |
0.7335312 |
| 1 |
1 |
898 |
26.6% |
0.2664688 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2 |
|
NA |
w02_dt201
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion of funding public facilities with aid of advertising [if
w02_u1_kommvalg]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Several Norwegian municipalities have in recent years entered into
contracts with companies that provide and maintain bus shelters, city
bicycles and public lavatories in return for the companies being allowed
to advertise in connection with these. What is your opinion of this?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am opposed to the municipality funding bus shelters, city bicycles and public
lavatories with the aid of advertising |
227 |
25.3% |
0.25278396 |
| 2 |
I support the municipality in funding bus shelters, city bicycles and public
lavatories with the aid of advertising |
648 |
72.2% |
0.72160356 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
2.6% |
0.02561247 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2474 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and w01_DT14 has a value. Randomized into two groups
and selects one of the following questions: DT203Aa/DT203Ab
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:845] [Invalid:2527]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
423 |
50.1% |
0.5005917 |
| 2 |
2 |
422 |
49.9% |
0.4994083 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2527 |
|
NA |
w02_dt203aa
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that: NOK 5,000 will be drawn as a travel gift card to the
participants in the Citizen Panel
|
|
Literal question:
|
It has now been decided that NOK 5,000 will be drawn as a travel gift
card to the participants in the Citizen Panel. To which degree do you
feel this decision is acceptable?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
40 |
9.5% |
0.094562648 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
78 |
18.4% |
0.184397163 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
122 |
28.8% |
0.288416076 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
113 |
26.7% |
0.267139480 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
68 |
16.1% |
0.160756501 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004728132 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2949 |
|
NA |
w02_dt203ab
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that: NOK 5,000 will be awarded to Doctors without borders
|
|
Literal question:
|
It has now been decided that NOK 5,000 will be awarded to Doctors
without borders. To which degree do you feel this decision is
acceptable?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
282 |
66.8% |
0.668246445 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
104 |
24.6% |
0.246445498 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
19 |
4.5% |
0.045023697 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
8 |
1.9% |
0.018957346 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
8 |
1.9% |
0.018957346 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002369668 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and w01_DT15 has a value. Randomized into two groups
and selects one of the following questions: DT203Ba/DT203Bb
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:825] [Invalid:2547]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
409 |
49.6% |
0.4957576 |
| 2 |
2 |
416 |
50.4% |
0.5042424 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_dt203ba
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that: NOK 5,000 will be drawn as a travel gift card to the
participants in the Citizen Panel
|
|
Literal question:
|
It has now been decided that NOK 5,000 will be drawn as a travel gift
card to the participants in the Citizen Panel. To which degree do you
feel this decision is acceptable?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
26 |
6.4% |
0.063569682 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
67 |
16.4% |
0.163814181 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
116 |
28.4% |
0.283618582 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
109 |
26.7% |
0.266503667 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
87 |
21.3% |
0.212713936 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.0% |
0.009779951 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2963 |
|
NA |
w02_dt203bb
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that: NOK 5,000 will be awarded to Doctors without borders
|
|
Literal question:
|
It has now been decided that NOK 5,000 will be awarded to Doctors
without borders. To which degree do you feel this decision is
acceptable?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
285 |
68.5% |
0.685096154 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
92 |
22.1% |
0.221153846 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
27 |
6.5% |
0.064903846 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
8 |
1.9% |
0.019230769 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
3 |
0.7% |
0.007211538 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002403846 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2956 |
|
NA |
w02_ocgb9
|
Variable label:
|
Duty or choice to vote
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some vote mainly based on duty. They believe that one should use one’s
vote, even though one doesn’t agree with any of the parties. Others
believe that one can freely choose not to vote if one cannot find a
party one agrees with. What is your opinion about voting, is it
primarily:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A duty |
457 |
52.1% |
0.52109464 |
| 2 |
A choice |
411 |
46.9% |
0.46864310 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.0% |
0.01026226 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_ocgb10
|
Variable label:
|
To which extent is it a duty to vote
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you believe it is a duty?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a great degree |
325 |
71.1% |
0.71115974 |
| 2 |
To some degree |
124 |
27.1% |
0.27133479 |
| 3 |
To a small degree |
8 |
1.8% |
0.01750547 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2915 |
|
NA |
w02_ocgb8_1
|
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of voting at the next election to the Storting
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the likelihood of you voting at the next election to the
Storting? Indicate the likelihood using the scale below.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - I most certainly will not vote |
25 |
2.9% |
0.028506271 |
| 2 |
1 |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004561003 |
| 3 |
2 |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004561003 |
| 4 |
3 |
3 |
0.3% |
0.003420753 |
| 5 |
4 |
7 |
0.8% |
0.007981756 |
| 6 |
5 |
15 |
1.7% |
0.017103763 |
| 7 |
6 |
8 |
0.9% |
0.009122007 |
| 8 |
7 |
12 |
1.4% |
0.013683010 |
| 9 |
8 |
36 |
4.1% |
0.041049031 |
| 10 |
9 |
77 |
8.8% |
0.087799316 |
| 11 |
10 - I most certainly will vote |
676 |
77.1% |
0.770809578 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.1% |
0.011402509 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1 into four groups and selects one of the
following questions: OCACM1 - OCACM4
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:871] [Invalid:2501]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
216 |
24.8% |
0.2479908 |
| 2 |
2 |
223 |
25.6% |
0.2560276 |
| 3 |
3 |
221 |
25.4% |
0.2537313 |
| 4 |
4 |
211 |
24.2% |
0.2422503 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2501 |
|
NA |
w02_ocacm1
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with NAV services
|
|
Literal question:
|
We want to know how you rate the services of Nav (Labour and welfare
administration). All in all, how satisfied are you with the quality of
the services?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very dissatisfied |
17 |
7.9% |
0.07870370 |
| 2 |
Dissatisfied |
22 |
10.2% |
0.10185185 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
40 |
18.5% |
0.18518519 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
37 |
17.1% |
0.17129630 |
| 5 |
Somewhat satisfied |
28 |
13.0% |
0.12962963 |
| 6 |
Satisfied |
28 |
13.0% |
0.12962963 |
| 7 |
Very satisfied |
7 |
3.2% |
0.03240741 |
| 8 |
Not applicable |
34 |
15.7% |
0.15740741 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01388889 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3156 |
|
NA |
w02_ocacm2
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with NAV services, given Aftenposten article
|
|
Literal question:
|
Aftenposten wrote the following: “Last year, users brought 5,114
complaints against Nav. A third complain about the employees’ conduct,
while more than half are dissatisfied with follow-up” (3. September
2013). We want to know how you rate the services of Nav (Labour and
welfare administration). All in all, how satisfied are you with the
quality of the services?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very dissatisfied |
8 |
3.6% |
0.03587444 |
| 2 |
Dissatisfied |
29 |
13.0% |
0.13004484 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
40 |
17.9% |
0.17937220 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
82 |
36.8% |
0.36771300 |
| 5 |
Somewhat satisfied |
15 |
6.7% |
0.06726457 |
| 6 |
Satisfied |
38 |
17.0% |
0.17040359 |
| 7 |
Very satisfied |
4 |
1.8% |
0.01793722 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.1% |
0.03139013 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3149 |
|
NA |
w02_ocacm3
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with NAV services, given Dagbladet article
|
|
Literal question:
|
Dagbladet wrote the following: “Last year, users brought 5,114
complaints against Nav. A third complain about the employees’ conduct,
while more than half are dissatisfied with follow-up” (3. September
2013). We want to know how you rate the services of Nav (Labour and
welfare administration). All in all, how satisfied are you with the
quality of the services?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very dissatisfied |
19 |
8.6% |
0.085972851 |
| 2 |
Dissatisfied |
31 |
14.0% |
0.140271493 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
33 |
14.9% |
0.149321267 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
77 |
34.8% |
0.348416290 |
| 5 |
Somewhat satisfied |
18 |
8.1% |
0.081447964 |
| 6 |
Satisfied |
32 |
14.5% |
0.144796380 |
| 7 |
Very satisfied |
9 |
4.1% |
0.040723982 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.9% |
0.009049774 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3151 |
|
NA |
w02_ocacm4
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with NAV services, given thousands of complaints
|
|
Literal question:
|
Last year, users brought 5,114 complaints against Nav. A third complain
about the employees’ conduct, while more than half are dissatisfied with
follow-up. We want to know how you rate the services of Nav (Labour and
welfare administration). All in all, how satisfied are you with the
quality of the services?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very dissatisfied |
16 |
7.6% |
0.07582938 |
| 2 |
Dissatisfied |
10 |
4.7% |
0.04739336 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
32 |
15.2% |
0.15165877 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
89 |
42.2% |
0.42180095 |
| 5 |
Somewhat satisfied |
21 |
10.0% |
0.09952607 |
| 6 |
Satisfied |
30 |
14.2% |
0.14218009 |
| 7 |
Very satisfied |
5 |
2.4% |
0.02369668 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
3.8% |
0.03791469 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3161 |
|
NA |
w02_ocacm5
|
Variable label:
|
Experience/contact with Nav in the past 12 months
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which experience/contact have you had with Nav in the past 12 months?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No experience/not had contact |
467 |
53.7% |
0.5373993 |
| 2 |
Personal experience with Nav |
201 |
