Codebook

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Round 26

v-104 - 2023-09-04









Produced by ideas2evidence










Citation

Researchers responsible

Name Affiliation
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten UiB
Stefan Dahlberg UiB
Sina Storelv UiB
Erla Løvseth UiB
Lise Lund Bjånesøy UiB
Hege Høivik Bye UiB
Gisela Böhm UiB
Anne Lise Fimreite UiB
Thea Gregersen NORCE
Erik Knudsen UiB
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø NORCE
Arjan Schakel UiB
Endre Tvinnereim UiB

Scientific committee for KODEM

Name Affiliaton
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten UiB
Tobias Bach UiO
Anne Lise Fimreite UiB
Henning Finseraas NTNU
Jonas Stein UiT

Coordinating team

Name
Erla Løvseth
Sina Storelv

Producers

Name Affiliation Role
Øivind Skjervheim ideas2evidence Coordinator
Olav Bjørnebekk ideas2evidence Project team member
Joachim Wettergreen ideas2evidence Project team member
Ola Grendal ideas2evidence Prosjektmedarbeider
Asle Høgestøl ideas2evidence Quality assurance

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at uib.no/en/citizen

Some of the questions in wave 26 are part of a system of coordinated surveys (“KODEM Light”), which also collects information about beliefs and convictions of elected representatives (uib.no/representant), and government employees (uib.no/NFP). This mode of data collection enables innovate research of groups that comprise parts of the political body in Norway.

Scope

Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Universe: Norwegian Citizens 18 years or older.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in the following waves:

Round Sample size Recruited
1 25 000 4 870
3 25 000 5 623
8 22 000 4 245
11 14 000 2 069
14 14 000 2 036
16 34 000 5 163
18 14 000 2 048
22 23 000 3 221
25 18 000 2 405

All samples are drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.

The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.

Mode of Data Collection

The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from previous waves: https://nsd.no/nsddata/serier/norsk_medborgerpanel_eng.html

In wave 26, emails were sent out on 16th of February, 2023.

An email with reminder was sent out three times; February 22nd or 28th (dependent on when winter break took place), 6th of March, and March 9th, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message. Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by email.

Wave 26 ended on the 14th of March 2023.

Weighting

To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different strata are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire.

Two different weights have been calculated:

When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weights are calculated using the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized) sub-groups, which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group compared to the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, variable columns are included in the dataset that indicates the proportion size of strata in the population.

Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.


Change Log

Version Release date / Date changed Variable Changes and notes
v-104 2023-09-04 NA Revised release of round 26
NA 2023-08-31 r26_Weight1 Corrected missing values
NA 2023-08-31 r26_Weight2 Corrected missing values
NA 2023-08-31 r26_Weight1stratapop Corrected missing values
NA 2023-08-31 r26_Weight2stratapop Corrected missing values
NA 2023-08-31 r26P5_1 Corrected missing values
NA 2023-08-31 r26P5_2 Corrected missing values
v-104 2023-08-31 NA Revised release of round 26
NA 2023-08-30 r20bk26 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-08-30 r22bk26_kodet Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-08-30 r25_bgedu Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-08-30 r25_pcvot21 Variable documentation updated
v-103 2023-07-04 NA Revised release of round 26
NA 2023-06-27 r26_pcsaf Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-06-27 r26_pcoil Variable documentation updated
v-102 2023-05-31 NA Revised release of round 26
NA 2023-05-30 r26_Weight3 New variable: Added r26_Weight3
NA 2023-05-30 r26_Weight4 New variable: Added r26_Weight4
NA 2023-05-30 r26_Weight5 New variable: Added r26_Weight5
NA 2023-05-30 r26_Weight3 Variable documentation inserted
NA 2023-05-30 r26_Weight4 Variable documentation inserted
NA 2023-05-30 r26_Weight5 Variable documentation inserted
NA 2023-05-26 r26P2 Replace missing values with value
NA 2023-05-15 r26_pcoil Corrected documentation
NA 2023-05-15 r26_pcecr Corrected documentation
NA 2023-05-15 r26_pcsaf Corrected documentation
NA 2023-05-15 r26_pcres Corrected documentation
v-101 2023-05-15 NA Revised release of round 26
v-100 2023-04-04 NA Initial release of round 26
NA 2023-03-28 r25_bgupc New variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years of age, based on registered municipality in r25_bgupm
NA 2023-03-28 r25_bgupc Variable documentation inserted
NA 2022-05-04 r22bk26_kodet New variable: New version of r22bk26 that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2022-05-04 r22bk27_kodet New variable: New version of r22bk27 that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2022-05-04 r23bk33_kodet New variable: New version of r23bk33 that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2022-05-04 r23bk21_kodet New variable: New version of r23bk21 that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2022-05-04 r23bk27_kodet New variable: New version of r23bk27 that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2022-05-04 r22bk26_kodet Variable documentation inserted
NA 2022-05-04 r22bk27_kodet Variable documentation inserted
NA 2022-02-14 r22oppvekstfylke New variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years of age, based on registered municipality in r22oppvekstkom
NA 2022-02-14 r22oppvekstfylke Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-05-12 r20tdr8_a_kodet New variable: New version of r20tdr8_a that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-05-12 r20tdr8_b_kodet New variable: New version of r20tdr8_b that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-05-12 r16k43_1_kodet New variable: New version of r16k43_1 that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-05-12 r16k43_2_kodet New variable: New version of r16k43_2 that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-05-12 r16k43_1_kodet Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-05-12 r16k43_2_kodet Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-02-11 r17oppvekstfylke New variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years of age, based on registered municipality in r17oppvekstkom
NA 2021-02-11 r18oppvekstfylke New variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years of age, based on registered municipality in r18oppvekstkom
NA 2021-02-11 r17oppvekstfylke Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-02-11 r18oppvekstfylke Variable documentation inserted
NA 2019-03-27 r11bk40_recode Added variable based on r11k40.
NA 2019-03-27 r14bk40_recode Added variable based on r14k40.


Dataset contents

File name Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 26 - v-104-O.sav
Distribution type Public
# Cases 12021
# Variables 441


Variable Documentation

responseid


Variable label: responseid
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r26_rekruttert


Variable label: [The wave the respondent was recruited]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-25]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Wave 1 1416 11.8% 0.11779386
3 Wave 3 1512 12.6% 0.12577989
8 Wave 8 1390 11.6% 0.11563098
11 Wave 11 754 6.3% 0.06272357
14 Wave 14 790 6.6% 0.06571833
16 Wave 16 2136 17.8% 0.17768904
18 Wave 18 847 7.0% 0.07046003
22 Wave 22 1600 13.3% 0.13310041
25 Wave 25 1576 13.1% 0.13110390


r26_interview_start


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r26_interview_end


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11450] [Invalid:571] [Range:-]



r26_browsertype


Variable label: [Browertype used by respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r26_browserversion


Variable label: [Browser version used by respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r26_mobil


Variable label: [Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Other 6244 51.9% 0.5194243
1 Mobile 5777 48.1% 0.4805757


r26_opplosning


Variable label: [Screen resolution of the applied device]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r26_enhetstype


Variable label: [Determines respondents device type]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 PC 6244 51.9% 0.519424341
2 Touch 5716 47.6% 0.475501206
3 Generic 61 0.5% 0.005074453


r26_advancedwifeaturesenabled


Variable label: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r26_getrenderingmode


Variable label: [Detects the browsers rendering mode]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r26_group


Variable label: Subgroup
Technical description: [Respondents recruited in wave 25 was set to group 2. Conditional randomisation for the remaining respondents: 60% was set to group 1, 20% was set to group 3, and 20% was set to group 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group 1 6239 51.9% 0.5190084
2 Group 2 (respondents recruited in wave 25) 1576 13.1% 0.1311039
3 Group 3 (kodemgroup 1) 2115 17.6% 0.1759421
4 Group 4 (kodemgroup 2) 2091 17.4% 0.1739456


r26_pcpin


Variable label: How interested are you in politics?
Literal question: In general, how interested are you in politics?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 923 14.8% 0.1479403751
2 Interested 3103 49.7% 0.4973553454
3 Somewhat interested 1762 28.2% 0.2824170540
4 Not very interested 395 6.3% 0.0633114281
5 Not interested at all 53 0.8% 0.0084949511
97 Not answered 3 0.0% 0.0004808463
98 Not asked 5782 NA


r26_pcmipo_1


Variable label: Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? (1)
Pre-question text: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Literal question: 1:
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description:

[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021] [Range:-]



r26_pcmipo_2


Variable label: Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? (2)
Pre-question text: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Literal question: 2:
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description:

[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021] [Range:-]



r26_pcmipo_3


Variable label: Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? (3)
Pre-question text: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Literal question: 3:
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description:

[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021] [Range:-]



r26_pcldpk


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Christian Democratic Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1153 14.8% 0.147536788
2 Really dislike 1444 18.5% 0.184772873
3 Dislike somewhat 1870 23.9% 0.239283429
4 Neither dislike nor like 1944 24.9% 0.248752399
5 Like somewhat 994 12.7% 0.127191299
6 Really like 268 3.4% 0.034293026
7 Intensely like 62 0.8% 0.007933461
97 Not answered 80 1.0% 0.010236724
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcldph


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Conservative Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 400 5.1% 0.05118362
2 Really dislike 955 12.2% 0.12220090
3 Dislike somewhat 1350 17.3% 0.17274472
4 Neither dislike nor like 1088 13.9% 0.13921945
5 Like somewhat 1937 24.8% 0.24785669
6 Really like 1530 19.6% 0.19577735
7 Intensely like 476 6.1% 0.06090851
97 Not answered 79 1.0% 0.01010877
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcldpf


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Progress Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Progress Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 2221 28.4% 0.284197057
2 Really dislike 1595 20.4% 0.204094690
3 Dislike somewhat 1174 15.0% 0.150223928
4 Neither dislike nor like 879 11.2% 0.112476008
5 Like somewhat 1128 14.4% 0.144337812
6 Really like 567 7.3% 0.072552783
7 Intensely like 181 2.3% 0.023160589
97 Not answered 70 0.9% 0.008957134
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcldpv


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Liberal Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 584 7.5% 0.07472809
2 Really dislike 965 12.3% 0.12348049
3 Dislike somewhat 1697 21.7% 0.21714651
4 Neither dislike nor like 2179 27.9% 0.27882278
5 Like somewhat 1693 21.7% 0.21663468
6 Really like 506 6.5% 0.06474728
7 Intensely like 95 1.2% 0.01215611
97 Not answered 96 1.2% 0.01228407
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcldpsv


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Socialist Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Socialist Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 842 10.8% 0.10774152
2 Really dislike 1217 15.6% 0.15572617
3 Dislike somewhat 1407 18.0% 0.18003839
4 Neither dislike nor like 1329 17.0% 0.17005758
5 Like somewhat 1577 20.2% 0.20179143
6 Really like 1085 13.9% 0.13883557
7 Intensely like 268 3.4% 0.03429303
97 Not answered 90 1.2% 0.01151631
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcldpsp


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Centre Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Centre Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1033 13.2% 0.132181702
2 Really dislike 1565 20.0% 0.200255918
3 Dislike somewhat 1969 25.2% 0.251951376
4 Neither dislike nor like 1621 20.7% 0.207421625
5 Like somewhat 1174 15.0% 0.150223928
6 Really like 316 4.0% 0.040435061
7 Intensely like 58 0.7% 0.007421625
97 Not answered 79 1.0% 0.010108765
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcldpm


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Green Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Green Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1560 20.0% 0.19961612
2 Really dislike 1205 15.4% 0.15419066
3 Dislike somewhat 1373 17.6% 0.17568778
4 Neither dislike nor like 1233 15.8% 0.15777351
5 Like somewhat 1562 20.0% 0.19987204
6 Really like 649 8.3% 0.08304543
7 Intensely like 152 1.9% 0.01944978
97 Not answered 81 1.0% 0.01036468
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcldpa


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Labour Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Labour Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 682 8.7% 0.087268074
2 Really dislike 933 11.9% 0.119385797
3 Dislike somewhat 1553 19.9% 0.198720409
4 Neither dislike nor like 1148 14.7% 0.146896993
5 Like somewhat 2219 28.4% 0.283941139
6 Really like 1027 13.1% 0.131413948
7 Intensely like 188 2.4% 0.024056302
97 Not answered 65 0.8% 0.008317338
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcldpr


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Red Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Red Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1663 21.3% 0.21279591
2 Really dislike 1296 16.6% 0.16583493
3 Dislike somewhat 1275 16.3% 0.16314779
4 Neither dislike nor like 1192 15.3% 0.15252719
5 Like somewhat 1451 18.6% 0.18566859
6 Really like 650 8.3% 0.08317338
7 Intensely like 209 2.7% 0.02674344
97 Not answered 79 1.0% 0.01010877
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pccoo


Variable label: Most people in general can be trusted
Literal question: Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Cannot be careful enough 26 0.3% 0.003326935
1 1 57 0.7% 0.007293666
2 2 106 1.4% 0.013563660
3 3 263 3.4% 0.033653231
4 4 286 3.7% 0.036596289
5 5 578 7.4% 0.073960333
6 6 796 10.2% 0.101855406
7 7 1836 23.5% 0.234932821
8 8 2621 33.5% 0.335380678
9 9 889 11.4% 0.113755598
10 10 – Most people can be trusted 335 4.3% 0.042866283
97 Not answered 22 0.3% 0.002815099
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcsal


Variable label: How satisfied are you with life
Literal question: All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 2133 27.3% 0.272936660
2 Satisfied 4483 57.4% 0.573640435
3 Somewhat satisfied 940 12.0% 0.120281510
4 Dissatisfied 204 2.6% 0.026103647
5 Not satisfied at all 41 0.5% 0.005246321
97 Not answered 14 0.2% 0.001791427
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcsaf


Variable label: How much safer or more unsafe has your local environment become
Literal question:

Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.

How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much safer 80 1.3% 0.012822568
2 Somewhat safer 420 6.7% 0.067318481
3 No change in safity 4685 75.1% 0.750921622
4 Somewhat more unsafe 958 15.4% 0.153550248
5 Much more unsafe 79 1.3% 0.012662286
97 Not answered 17 0.3% 0.002724796
98 Not asked 5782 NA


r26_pcecz


Variable label: Assessment of: The financial situation in Norway in a year
Literal question: What do you think about the financial situation in Norway in a year?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
5 Much worse than today 42 0.5% 0.005374280
4 Worse than today 1388 17.8% 0.177607166
3 Neither worse nor better than today 3434 43.9% 0.439411388
2 Better than today 2708 34.7% 0.346513116
1 Much better than today 204 2.6% 0.026103647
97 Not answered 39 0.5% 0.004990403
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pccop


Variable label: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Literal question: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A very high degree 151 1.9% 0.019321817
2 A high degree 2192 28.0% 0.280486244
3 Some degree 3323 42.5% 0.425207933
4 A low degree 1618 20.7% 0.207037748
5 Not at all 458 5.9% 0.058605246
97 Not answered 73 0.9% 0.009341011
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pccos


Variable label: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A very high degree 352 4.5% 0.045041587
2 A high degree 2945 37.7% 0.376839411
3 Some degree 3007 38.5% 0.384772873
4 A low degree 1113 14.2% 0.142418426
5 Not at all 341 4.4% 0.043634037
97 Not answered 57 0.7% 0.007293666
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pccom


Variable label: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A very high degree 320 4.1% 0.04094690
2 A high degree 3026 38.7% 0.38720409
3 Some degree 3259 41.7% 0.41701855
4 A low degree 918 11.7% 0.11746641
5 Not at all 250 3.2% 0.03198976
97 Not answered 42 0.5% 0.00537428
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcsag


Variable label: How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 114 1.5% 0.014587332
2 Satisfied 1228 15.7% 0.157133717
3 Somewhat satisfied 2511 32.1% 0.321305182
4 Dissatisfied 2551 32.6% 0.326423544
5 Not satisfied at all 1345 17.2% 0.172104926
97 Not answered 66 0.8% 0.008445298
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcecr


Variable label: Economic situation in [r26_P2] compared to the rest of the country
Literal question: If you compare the economic situation [r26_P2] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation [r26_P2] as being better, the same or worse?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Better 1695 21.7% 0.21689060
2 The same 4715 60.3% 0.60332694
3 Worse 1331 17.0% 0.17031350
97 Not answered 74 0.9% 0.00946897
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcter


Variable label: To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Literal question: To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 157 2.0% 0.020089571
2 To a great extent 785 10.0% 0.100447857
3 Somewhat 3434 43.9% 0.439411388
4 Slightly 2972 38.0% 0.380294306
5 Not at all 444 5.7% 0.056813820
97 Not answered 23 0.3% 0.002943058
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcepe


Variable label: How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
Literal question: How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 20 1.3% 0.012690355
2 To a great extent 177 11.2% 0.112309645
3 Somewhat 635 40.3% 0.402918782
4 Slightly 563 35.7% 0.357233503
5 Not at all 168 10.7% 0.106598985
97 Not answered 13 0.8% 0.008248731
98 Not asked 10445 NA


r26_pcipe


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
Literal question:

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 81 5.1% 0.051395939
2 Agree 231 14.7% 0.146573604
3 Agree somewhat 468 29.7% 0.296954315
4 Neither agree nor disagree 178 11.3% 0.112944162
5 Disagree somewhat 207 13.1% 0.131345178
6 Disagree 301 19.1% 0.190989848
7 Strongly disagree 103 6.5% 0.065355330
97 Not answered 7 0.4% 0.004441624
98 Not asked 10445 NA


r26_pcrur_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r26_pcrur].
Technical description: [Randomized if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7793] [Invalid:4228] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 rural Norway 3936 50.5% 0.5050687
2 non-urban/rural Norway 3857 49.5% 0.4949313
Sysmiss 4228 NA


r26_pcrur


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for [r26_pcrur_ran].
Literal question:

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:

Government authorities show little consideration for [r26_pcrur_ran].
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 1181 15.1% 0.151119642
2 Agree 1792 22.9% 0.229302623
3 Agree somewhat 2019 25.8% 0.258349328
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1214 15.5% 0.155342290
5 Disagree somewhat 655 8.4% 0.083813180
6 Disagree 687 8.8% 0.087907869
7 Strongly disagree 228 2.9% 0.029174664
97 Not answered 39 0.5% 0.004990403
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcres


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality.
Literal question:

To what extent do you agree with the following statement:

Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich in order to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 914 11.7% 0.116954575
2 Agree 2535 32.4% 0.324376200
3 Agree somewhat 2519 32.2% 0.322328855
4 Neither agree nor disagree 895 11.5% 0.114523353
5 Disagree somewhat 536 6.9% 0.068586052
6 Disagree 275 3.5% 0.035188740
7 Strongly disagree 85 1.1% 0.010876520
97 Not answered 56 0.7% 0.007165707
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcmun


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers
Literal question:

Norway now has 356 municipalities instead of 422 as before. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:

The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 953 12.2% 0.121944978
2 Agree 1047 13.4% 0.133973129
3 Agree somewhat 1030 13.2% 0.131797825
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1748 22.4% 0.223672425
5 Disagree somewhat 796 10.2% 0.101855406
6 Disagree 1387 17.7% 0.177479207
7 Strongly disagree 810 10.4% 0.103646833
97 Not answered 44 0.6% 0.005630198
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcmsc_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects what version of [r26_pcmsc] is exposed to the respondent.
Technical description: [Randomized if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7784] [Invalid:4237] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [r26_pcmsc] with a open follow-up question on the same pge 2643 34.0% 0.3395427
2 [r26_pcmsc] without a follow-up question 2581 33.2% 0.3315776
3 [r26_pcmsc] with a follow-up question on the next page 2560 32.9% 0.3288798
Sysmiss 4237 NA


r26_pcmsc


Variable label: Agree/disagree: It should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools.
Literal question:

Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith.

How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
Technical description:

[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]

[Shown on the same page with [r26_pcmsc_txt] if [r26_pcmsc_ran] == 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 229 2.9% 0.029302623
2 Agree 869 11.1% 0.111196417
3 Agree somewhat 998 12.8% 0.127703135
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1505 19.3% 0.192578375
5 Disagree somewhat 1010 12.9% 0.129238644
6 Disagree 1444 18.5% 0.184772873
7 Strongly disagree 1704 21.8% 0.218042226
97 Not answered 56 0.7% 0.007165707
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcmsc_txt


Variable label: Open: Comments to [r26_pcmsc]. Showed on the same page as [r26_pcmsc].
Literal question: If you have comments to the question you can write them here.
Technical description:

[Asked if (r26_pcmsc_ran = 1) & (r26_group = 1,2)]

[Shown on the same page with [r26_pcmsc] if [r26_pcmsc_ran] == 1]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021] [Range:-]



r26_pcmsco


Variable label: Comments to [r26_pcmsc]. Shown on the page after [r26_pcmsc].
Literal question: We will now move on to the next topic. If you have any comments about the previous question, please write them here.
Technical description:

[Asked if (r26_pcmsc_ran = 3) & (r26_group = 1,2)]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021] [Range:-]



r26_pcinc


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society
Literal question:

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following suggestion:

The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society to greater extent.
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 2015 25.8% 0.25783749
2 Agree 2321 29.7% 0.29699296
3 Agree somewhat 1700 21.8% 0.21753039
4 Neither agree nor disagree 702 9.0% 0.08982726
5 Disagree somewhat 565 7.2% 0.07229687
6 Disagree 331 4.2% 0.04235445
7 Strongly disagree 128 1.6% 0.01637876
97 Not answered 53 0.7% 0.00678183
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcpri


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
Literal question:

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:

The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 651 8.3% 0.083301344
2 Agree 1781 22.8% 0.227895074
3 Agree somewhat 2290 29.3% 0.293026232
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1063 13.6% 0.136020473
5 Disagree somewhat 932 11.9% 0.119257837
6 Disagree 683 8.7% 0.087396033
7 Strongly disagree 343 4.4% 0.043889955
97 Not answered 72 0.9% 0.009213052
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pccar


Variable label: Proposal that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
Literal question:

The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.

Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
Post-question: See National Transport Plan 2018-2029, page 16, available here [external link]: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-33-20162017/id2546287
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run on hydrogen. 2302 29.5% 0.29456174
2 In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars which run on diesel or petrol. 5414 69.3% 0.69277031
97 Not answered 99 1.3% 0.01266795
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcsex


Variable label: Agree/disagree: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
Literal question:

To what extent do you agree with the following assertion:

It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention.
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 105 1.3% 0.013435701
2 Agree 201 2.6% 0.025719770
3 Agree somewhat 790 10.1% 0.101087652
4 Neither agree nor disagree 606 7.8% 0.077543186
5 Disagree somewhat 746 9.5% 0.095457454
6 Disagree 2164 27.7% 0.276903391
7 Strongly disagree 3148 40.3% 0.402815099
97 Not answered 55 0.7% 0.007037748
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_innae


Variable label: How do you rate the increased military presence of NATO in Eastern Europe?
Literal question: NATO has recently increased its military forces and military equipment in Eastern Europe considerably. How do you rate the increased military presence in Eastern Europe?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positively 2413 30.9% 0.308765195
2 Somewhat positively 2554 32.7% 0.326807422
3 Neither positively, nor negatively 954 12.2% 0.122072937
4 Somewhat negatively 809 10.4% 0.103518874
5 Very negatively 482 6.2% 0.061676264
6 Do not know 538 6.9% 0.068841971
97 Not answered 65 0.8% 0.008317338
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcimm


Variable label: Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
Literal question: In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A very great advantage 457 5.8% 0.058477287
2 A great advantage 1771 22.7% 0.226615483
3 A slight advantage 3049 39.0% 0.390147153
4 Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage 1099 14.1% 0.140626999
5 A slight disadvantage 920 11.8% 0.117722329
6 A great disadvantage 292 3.7% 0.037364044
7 A very great disadvantage 165 2.1% 0.021113244
97 Not answered 62 0.8% 0.007933461
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcldi


Variable label: Like/dislike: immigrants in Norway
Literal question: In general, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
7 Intensely like 481 6.2% 0.06154830
6 Really like 2097 26.8% 0.26833013
5 Like somewhat 2034 26.0% 0.26026871
4 Neither dislike nor like 2246 28.7% 0.28739603
3 Dislike somewhat 653 8.4% 0.08355726
2 Really dislike 131 1.7% 0.01676264
1 Intensely dislike 85 1.1% 0.01087652
97 Not answered 88 1.1% 0.01126040
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcref


Variable label: Your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum.
Literal question: What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much easier 284 3.6% 0.03634037
2 Easier 990 12.7% 0.12667946
3 Somewhat easier 1659 21.2% 0.21228407
4 Same as today 3160 40.4% 0.40435061
5 Slightly more difficult 829 10.6% 0.10607806
6 More difficult 464 5.9% 0.05937300
7 Much more difficult 347 4.4% 0.04440179
97 Not answered 82 1.0% 0.01049264
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcint


Variable label: As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
Literal question: As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 484 6.2% 0.06193218
2 Good 2274 29.1% 0.29097889
3 Somewhat good 1719 22.0% 0.21996161
4 Neither good nor bad 954 12.2% 0.12207294
5 Somewhat poor 1394 17.8% 0.17837492
6 Poor 686 8.8% 0.08777991
7 Very poor 221 2.8% 0.02827895
97 Not answered 83 1.1% 0.01062060
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pceco


Variable label: Assessment of: Your own financial situation today
Literal question: How would you assess your own financial situation today?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 1005 12.9% 0.128598848
2 Good 3734 47.8% 0.477799104
3 Quite good 1299 16.6% 0.166218810
4 Neither good nor bad 962 12.3% 0.123096609
5 Quite bad 504 6.4% 0.064491363
6 Bad 180 2.3% 0.023032630
7 Very bad 68 0.9% 0.008701216
97 Not answered 63 0.8% 0.008061420
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_pcecy


Variable label: Assessment of: Your own financial situation in a year
Literal question: How would you assess your own financial situation in a year?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
5 Much worse than today 105 1.3% 0.013435701
4 Worse than today 1160 14.8% 0.148432502
3 Neither worse nor better than today 5172 66.2% 0.661804223
2 Better than today 1249 16.0% 0.159820857
1 Much better than today 50 0.6% 0.006397953
97 Not answered 79 1.0% 0.010108765
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_cepow_1


Variable label: Have you done anything in your home to reduce electricity consumption and/or reduce the cost of electricity consumption?: Yes, I have taken measures to use less electricity
Pre-question text:

Electricity prices have been unusually high in parts of the country over the past year.

Have you done anything in your home to reduce electricity consumption and/or reduce the cost of electricity consumption?
Literal question: Yes, I have taken measures to use less electricity
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Question owner: Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1117 70.9% 0.708756345
0 Not selected 446 28.3% 0.282994924
97 Not answered 13 0.8% 0.008248731
98 Not asked 10445 NA


r26_cepow_2


Variable label: Have you done anything in your home to reduce electricity consumption and/or reduce the cost of electricity consumption?: Yes, I have taken measures to move the use of electricity to other times of the day
Pre-question text:

Electricity prices have been unusually high in parts of the country over the past year.

Have you done anything in your home to reduce electricity consumption and/or reduce the cost of electricity consumption?
Literal question: Yes, I have taken measures to move the use of electricity to other times of the day
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Question owner: Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 580 36.8% 0.368020305
0 Not selected 983 62.4% 0.623730964
97 Not answered 13 0.8% 0.008248731
98 Not asked 10445 NA


r26_cepow_3


Variable label: Have you done anything in your home to reduce electricity consumption and/or reduce the cost of electricity consumption?: No
Pre-question text:

Electricity prices have been unusually high in parts of the country over the past year.

Have you done anything in your home to reduce electricity consumption and/or reduce the cost of electricity consumption?
Literal question: No
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Question owner: Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 244 15.5% 0.154822335
0 Not selected 1319 83.7% 0.836928934
97 Not answered 13 0.8% 0.008248731
98 Not asked 10445 NA


r26_cepow_txt


Variable label: Comments to [r26_cepow]
Literal question: You can here write more about prices for and consumption of electricity:
Question owner: Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021] [Range:-]



r26_bghea


Variable label: In general, how would you say your health is?
Literal question: In general, how would you say your health is?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Excellent 573 9.2% 0.091841641
2 Very good 1898 30.4% 0.304215419
3 Good 2416 38.7% 0.387241545
4 Somewhat good 1023 16.4% 0.163968585
5 Poor 269 4.3% 0.043115884
97 Not answered 60 1.0% 0.009616926
98 Not asked 5782 NA


r26_bghel


Variable label: In general, how would you say your health is?
Literal question: In general, how would you say your health is?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Excellent 275 17.4% 0.17449239
2 Good 827 52.5% 0.52474619
3 Moderately good 329 20.9% 0.20875635
4 Not very good 104 6.6% 0.06598985
5 Poor 22 1.4% 0.01395939
97 Not answered 19 1.2% 0.01205584
98 Not asked 10445 NA


r26_bgtraf


Variable label: To what extent would you say that you have feminine characteristics
Literal question: To what extent would you say that you had feminine characteristics? I have…
Question owner: Ingvild Leren Stensrud (EUI)
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - few feminine characteristics 110 7.0% 0.06979695
1 1 121 7.7% 0.07677665
2 2 228 14.5% 0.14467005
3 3 120 7.6% 0.07614213
4 4 97 6.2% 0.06154822
5 5 142 9.0% 0.09010152
6 6 92 5.8% 0.05837563
7 7 165 10.5% 0.10469543
8 8 234 14.8% 0.14847716
9 9 124 7.9% 0.07868020
10 10 - many feminine characteristics 99 6.3% 0.06281726
97 Not answered 44 2.8% 0.02791878
98 Not asked 10445 NA


r26_bgtram


Variable label: To what extent would you say that you have male characteristics
Literal question: To what extent would you say that you had male characteristics? I have…
Question owner: Ingvild Leren Stensrud (EUI)
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - few masculine characteristics 78 4.9% 0.04949239
1 1 109 6.9% 0.06916244
2 2 170 10.8% 0.10786802
3 3 162 10.3% 0.10279188
4 4 96 6.1% 0.06091371
5 5 157 10.0% 0.09961929
6 6 123 7.8% 0.07804569
7 7 191 12.1% 0.12119289
8 8 264 16.8% 0.16751269
9 9 115 7.3% 0.07296954
10 10 - many masculine characteristics 63 4.0% 0.03997462
97 Not answered 48 3.0% 0.03045685
98 Not asked 10445 NA


r26_bggid


Variable label: How important is it to you that others see you as [masculine/feminine]?
Literal question:

In our database, you are registered as [male/female].

How important is it to you that others see you as [masculine/feminine]?
Question owner: Ingvild Leren Stensrud (EUI)
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 143 9.1% 0.090736041
2 Important 447 28.4% 0.283629442
3 Somewhat important 383 24.3% 0.243020305
4 Not very important 338 21.4% 0.214467005
5 Not important at all 215 13.6% 0.136421320
6 My registered gender is not correct 2 0.1% 0.001269036
7 I do not want to answer this question 23 1.5% 0.014593909
97 Not answered 25 1.6% 0.015862944
98 Not asked 10445 NA


r26_bgciv


Variable label: Marital status
Literal question: What is your marital status? Check what fits the best
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Single 746 12.0% 0.119570444
2 Non-domestic relationship 302 4.8% 0.048405193
3 Cohabitant 952 15.3% 0.152588556
4 Married/legally registered partner 3552 56.9% 0.569322007
5 Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner 347 5.6% 0.055617887
6 Widow/widower 262 4.2% 0.041993909
7 Other: 20 0.3% 0.003205642
97 Not answered 58 0.9% 0.009296362
98 Not asked 5782 NA


r26_bgciv_7_other


Variable label: Other: Marital status
Pre-question text: What is your marital status? Check what fits the best
Literal question: Other:
Technical description:

[Asked if (r26_group = 1) & (r26_group = 1,2)]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021] [Range:-]



r26_bgday


Variable label: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Literal question: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days?
Post-question: Select one alternative
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) 3339 42.7% 0.4272552783
2 In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more 242 3.1% 0.0309660909
3 In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week 250 3.2% 0.0319897633
4 Self-employed 301 3.9% 0.0385156750
5 In education (not paid by an employer) 182 2.3% 0.0232885477
6 Unemployed and actively seeking a job 55 0.7% 0.0070377479
7 Unemployed and not actively seeking a job 28 0.4% 0.0035828535
8 Permanently ill or disabled 456 5.8% 0.0583493282
9 Retired 2635 33.7% 0.3371721049
10 In military service 5 0.1% 0.0006397953
11 Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons 33 0.4% 0.0042226488
12 Other: 217 2.8% 0.0277671145
97 Not answered 72 0.9% 0.0092130518
98 Not asked 4206 NA


r26_bgday_12_other


Variable label: Other: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Pre-question text: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days?
Literal question: Other:
Post-question: Select one alternative
Technical description:

[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021] [Range:-]



r26_bgsct


Variable label: What type of business/enterprise do you work in?
Literal question: What type of business/enterprise do you work in?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1 & r26_bgday = 1,2,3)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 State, county or municipal administration 410 13.7% 0.136666667
2 Other public sector (e.g. school and health services) 896 29.9% 0.298666667
3 Publicly owned enterprise 201 6.7% 0.067000000
4 Private business 1378 45.9% 0.459333333
5 Self-employed 22 0.7% 0.007333333
6 Other: 87 2.9% 0.029000000
97 Not answered 6 0.2% 0.002000000
98 Not asked 9021 NA


r26_bgsct_6_other


Variable label: Other: What type of business/enterprise do you work in?
Pre-question text: What type of business/enterprise do you work in?
Literal question: Other:
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 1 & r26_bgday = 1,2,3)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021] [Range:-]



r26_bgoil


Variable label: [Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely associated with it?
Literal question: [Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely associated with it?
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_bgday = 1,2,3,9) & (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes, I [work/worked] in the oil or gas industry 285 4.4% 0.044076709
2 Yes, my job [is/was] closely associated with the oil or gas industry 250 3.9% 0.038663780
3 No, but previously I have worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely associated with it 177 2.7% 0.027373956
4 No 5726 88.6% 0.885555212
97 Not answered 28 0.4% 0.004330343
98 Not asked 5555 NA


r26_bgoily


Variable label: When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry?
Literal question: When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry (or your first job closely associated with the oil and gas industry)?
Technical description:

[Asked if (r26_bgoil = 1,2) & (r26_group = 1,2)]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021] [Range:-]



r26k2_dmcrix_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects and element for textpiping in [r26k2_dmcrix].
Question owner: Lise Bjånesøy (UiB), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Åsa von Schoultz (UiH)
Equivalent in others panels: f3k2_dmcrix_ran; p9k2_dmcrix_ran
Technical description: [Randomized if (r26_group = 3,4)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4206] [Invalid:7815] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 central administration (ministries, directorates, etc.) doing a good enough job 840 20.0% 0.1997147
2 the Government doing a good enough job 782 18.6% 0.1859249
3 national politicians doing a good enough job 846 20.1% 0.2011412
4 local politicians doing a good enough job 849 20.2% 0.2018545
5 Norwegian democracy working well enough 889 21.1% 0.2113647
Sysmiss 7815 NA


r26k2_dmcrix


Variable label: Level of trust that [r26k2_dmcrix_ran] when faced with the crises that have affected society over the past year
Literal question: How much trust or distrust do you personally have in [r26k2_dmcrix_ran] when faced with the crises that have affected society over the past year?
Question owner: Lise Bjånesøy (UiB), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Åsa von Schoultz (UiH)
Equivalent in others panels: f3k2_dmcrix; p9k2_dmcrix
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 3,4)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A great deal of trust 189 4.5% 0.0449358060
2 A lot of trust 1513 36.0% 0.3597242035
3 Some trust 1325 31.5% 0.3150261531
4 Neither trust nor distrust 262 6.2% 0.0622919639
5 Some distrust 475 11.3% 0.1129339039
6 A lot of distrust 313 7.4% 0.0744174988
7 A great deal of distrust 125 3.0% 0.0297194484
97 Not answered 4 0.1% 0.0009510223
98 Not asked 7815 NA


r26k2_dminfx_ran1


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r26k2_dminfx].
Question owner: Lise Bjånesøy (UiB), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Åsa von Schoultz (UiH)
Equivalent in others panels: f3k2_dminfx_ran1; p9k2_dminfx_ran1
Technical description: [Randomized if (r26_group = 3,4)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4206] [Invalid:7815] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 central administration (ministries, directorates, etc.) 1412 33.6% 0.3357109
2 national politicians 1380 32.8% 0.3281027
3 voters 1414 33.6% 0.3361864
Sysmiss 7815 NA


r26k2_dminfx_ran2


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r26k2_dminfx].
Question owner: Lise Bjånesøy (UiB), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Åsa von Schoultz (UiH)
Equivalent in others panels: f3k2_dminfx_ran2; p9k2_dminfx_ran2
Technical description: [Randomized if (r26_group = 3,4)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4206] [Invalid:7815] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 immigration issues 2132 50.7% 0.5068949
2 health issues 2074 49.3% 0.4931051
Sysmiss 7815 NA


r26k2_dminfx


Variable label: Should [r26k2_dminfx_ran1] have more or less influence over decisions on [r26k2_dminfx_ran2]
Literal question: In your opinion, should [r26k2_dminfx_ran1] have more or less influence than they currently have over decisions on [r26k2_dminfx_ran2]?
Question owner: Lise Bjånesøy (UiB), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Åsa von Schoultz (UiH)
Equivalent in others panels: f3k2_dminfx; p9k2_dminfx
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 3,4)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much more 206 4.9% 0.04897765
2 More 816 19.4% 0.19400856
3 A little more 656 15.6% 0.15596767
4 Neither more nor less 1872 44.5% 0.44507846
5 A little less 353 8.4% 0.08392772
6 Less 185 4.4% 0.04398478
7 Much less 73 1.7% 0.01735616
97 Not answered 45 1.1% 0.01069900
98 Not asked 7815 NA


r26k2_ineci_1


Variable label: How do you respond to the following statements about Norway’s position in European collaboration?: The energy crisis shows that it is important for Norway to collaborate on energy with the European Union (EU).
Pre-question text: How do you respond to the following statements about Norway’s position in European collaboration?
Literal question: The energy crisis shows that it is important for Norway to collaborate on energy with the European Union (EU).
Question owner: Anne Elizabeth Stie (UiA), Jarle Trondal (UiA)
Equivalent in others panels: f3k2_ineci_1; p9k2_ineci_1
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 245 11.6% 0.11583924
2 Agree 501 23.7% 0.23687943
3 Agree somewhat 385 18.2% 0.18203310
4 Neither agree nor disagree 177 8.4% 0.08368794
5 Disagree somewhat 245 11.6% 0.11583924
6 Disagree 263 12.4% 0.12434988
7 Strongly disagree 228 10.8% 0.10780142
8 Do not know 68 3.2% 0.03215130
97 Not answered 3 0.1% 0.00141844
98 Not asked 9906 NA


r26k2_ineci_2


Variable label: How do you respond to the following statements about Norway’s position in European collaboration?: The Covid-19 crisis shows that it is important for Norway to collaborate on vaccines with the EU.
Pre-question text: How do you respond to the following statements about Norway’s position in European collaboration?
Literal question: The Covid-19 crisis shows that it is important for Norway to collaborate on vaccines with the EU.
Question owner: Anne Elizabeth Stie (UiA), Jarle Trondal (UiA)
Equivalent in others panels: f3k2_ineci_2; p9k2_ineci_2
Technical description: [Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases