Codebook - Round 29 - Norwegian Citizen Panel
Codebook
Norwegian Citizen Panel
Round 29
v-102 - 2024-06-27
Produced by ideas2evidence
Citation
Researchers responsible
| Name | Affiliation |
|---|---|
| Elisabeth Ivarsflaten | UiB |
| Stefan Dahlberg | UiB |
| Sina Storelv | UiB |
| Erla Løvseth | UiB |
| Lise Lund Bjånesøy | UiB |
| Troy Saghaug Broderstad | UiT |
| Hege Høivik Bye | UiB |
| Gisela Böhm | UiB |
| Marta Rekdal Eidheim | UiB |
| Thea Gregersen | NORCE |
| Erik Knudsen | UiB |
| Åsta Dyrnes Nordø | NORCE |
| Arjan Schakel | UiB |
| Endre Tvinnereim | UiB |
Coordinating team
| Name |
|---|
| Erla Løvseth |
| Sina Storelv |
Producers
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Øivind Skjervheim | ideas2evidence | Coordinator |
| Olav Bjørnebekk | ideas2evidence | Project team member |
| Joachim Wettergreen | ideas2evidence | Project team member |
| Ola Grendal | ideas2evidence | Project team member |
| Georg Stokke | ideas2evidence | Project team member |
| Asle Høgestøl | ideas2evidence | Quality assurance |
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Sikt - Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research. The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at uib.no/en/citizen
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Universe: Norwegian citizens 18 years
or older.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in the following waves:
| Round | Sample size | Recruited |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 000 | 4 870 |
| 3 | 25 000 | 5 623 |
| 8 | 22 000 | 4 245 |
| 11 | 14 000 | 2 069 |
| 14 | 14 000 | 2 036 |
| 16 | 34 000 | 5 163 |
| 18 | 14 000 | 2 048 |
| 22 | 23 000 | 3 221 |
| 25 | 18 000 | 2 405 |
All samples are drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register.
The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from previous waves: https://surveybanken.sikt.no/en/series/ed271b1c-2595-47e4-8c97-3fcc00f02368. Screenshots of the questions are available on request from DIGSSCORE.
In wave 29, email invitations were sent out on 15th of January 2024 for softlaunch, and on the 15th of January for the main launch.
An email with reminder was sent out three times; 19th of January, 24th of January, and 29th of January to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message. Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by email.
Wave 29 ended on the 5th of February 2024.
Weighting
To compensate for observed bias, a weight has been calculated. The weight equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1.
When calculating the weight, the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).
One weight have been calculated:
- Weight combining gender, age, geography, and two-part education.
When applied, the weight will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weight are calculated using the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized) sub-groups, which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group compared to the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, data is included in the dataset which indicates the proportion size of strata in the population.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
| Version | Release date / Date changed | Variable | Changes and notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| v-102 | 2024-06-27 | Revised release of round 29 | |
| 2024-06-27 | c26_bginc | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | c26_bgchi | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | c27_bgoily_decade | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29_pcmipo_1_coded1 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29_pcmipo_2_coded1 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29_pcmipo_3_coded1 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29P1 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29P2 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29P3 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29P3_2 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29P4_1 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29P4_2 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29P5_1 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29P5_2 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29_Weight4 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29_Weight4_stratapop | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29_generic_stratapop | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29P_moved | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-27 | r29P5_3 | Variable documentation updated | |
| v-101 | 2024-06-21 | Revised release of round 29 | |
| 2024-06-18 | c26_pcipe | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-18 | c26_pcepe | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_pcldpsv | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_rekruttert | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_pcldpk | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_pcldph | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_pcldpf | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_pcldpv | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_pcldpsp | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_pcldpm | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_pcldpa | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_pcldpr | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_pcmipo_1_coded1 | Variable documentation inserted | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_pcmipo_2_coded1 | Variable documentation inserted | |
| 2024-06-18 | r29_pcmipo_3_coded1 | Variable documentation inserted | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_pcmipo_1_coded1 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_pcmipo_2_coded1 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_pcmipo_3_coded1 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgciv | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_pcpar | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgedu | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgday | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgsct | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgscp | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_1 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_2 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_3 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_4 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_5 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_6 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_7 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_8 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_9 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_10 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_11 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_12 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_13 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_14 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_15 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_16 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_17 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_18 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_19 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_20 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_21 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_mobil | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_dvase_4 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_pcmsc | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_pcmsc_txt | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_pcpar_14_other | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgedu_12_other | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgday_12_other | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgsct_6_other | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgscp_6_other | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_bgind_21_other | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29_hewor_1_other | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29P5_1 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29P5_2 | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-06-13 | r29P5_3 | Variable documentation inserted | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgciv | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgciv_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_pcpar | Added variable: Coded version of r29_pcpar_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgedu | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgedu_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgday | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgday_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgsct | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgsct_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgscp | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgscp_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_1 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_1_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_2 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_2_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_3 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_3_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_4 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_4_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_5 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_5_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_6 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_6_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_7 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_7_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_8 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_8_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_9 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_9_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_10 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_10_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_11 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_11_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_12 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_12_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_13 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_13_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_14 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_14_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_15 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_15_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_16 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_16_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_17 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_17_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_18 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_18_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_19 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_19_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_20 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_20_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_bgind_21 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_bgind_21_raw | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_pcmipo_1_coded1 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_pcmipo_1 | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_pcmipo_2_coded1 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_pcmipo_2 | |
| 2024-06-12 | r29_pcmipo_3_coded1 | Added variable: Coded version of r29_pcmipo_3 | |
| v-100 | 2024-03-26 | Initial release of round 29 | |
| 2024-03-12 | r28_pcvot23m | Updated variable: New versions of r28_pcvot23m that includes coded other-statements | |
| 2024-03-12 | r28_pcvot23c | Updated variable: New versions of r28_pcvot23c that includes coded other-statements | |
| 2024-03-12 | r28_pcvot23m | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-03-12 | r28_pcvot23c | Variable documentation updated | |
| 2024-01-23 | r28_pcvot23m | Variable documentation updated |
Dataset contents
| File name | Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 29 - v-102-O.sav |
| Distribution type | Public |
| # Cases | 10099 |
| # Variables | 254 |
Variable Documentation
responseid
| Variable label: | responseid |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:-] |
r29_rekruttert
| Variable label: | The wave the respondent was recruited |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | The wave the respondent was recruited |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-25] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wave 1 | 1279 | 12.7% | 0.12664620 |
| 3 | Wave 3 | 1326 | 13.1% | 0.13130013 |
| 8 | Wave 8 | 1239 | 12.3% | 0.12268541 |
| 11 | Wave 11 | 669 | 6.6% | 0.06624418 |
| 14 | Wave 14 | 698 | 6.9% | 0.06911575 |
| 16 | Wave 16 | 1798 | 17.8% | 0.17803743 |
| 18 | Wave 18 | 712 | 7.1% | 0.07050203 |
| 22 | Wave 22 | 1284 | 12.7% | 0.12714130 |
| 25 | Wave 25 | 1094 | 10.8% | 0.10832756 |
r29_interview_start
| Variable label: | [Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.] |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:-] |
r29_interview_end
| Variable label: | [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.] |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9345] [Invalid:754] [Range:-] |
r29_browsertype
| Variable label: | Browertype used by respondent |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | Browertype used by respondent |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:-] |
r29_browserversion
| Variable label: | Browser version used by respondent |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | Browser version used by respondent |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:-] |
r29_mobil
| Variable label: | Determines if the respondents uses mobile/tablet |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | Determines if the respondents uses mobile/tablet |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Other | 5311 | 52.6% | 0.5258937 |
| 1 | Mobile | 4788 | 47.4% | 0.4741063 |
r29_opplosning
| Variable label: | Screen resolution of the applied device |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | Screen resolution of the applied device |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:-] |
r29_enhetstype
| Variable label: | Determines respondents device type |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | Determines respondents device type |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PC | 5311 | 52.6% | 0.525893653 |
| 2 | Touch | 4736 | 46.9% | 0.468957323 |
| 3 | Generic | 52 | 0.5% | 0.005149025 |
r29_advancedwifeaturesenabled
| Variable label: | Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:-] |
r29_getrenderingmode
| Variable label: | Detects the browsers rendering mode |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | Detects the browsers rendering mode |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:-] |
r29_pcmipo_1
| Variable label: | Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? (1) |
| Pre-question text: | What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? |
| Literal question: | 1: |
| Post-question: | Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10099] [Range:-] |
r29_pcmipo_2
| Variable label: | Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? (2) |
| Pre-question text: | What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? |
| Literal question: | 2: |
| Post-question: | Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10099] [Range:-] |
r29_pcmipo_3
| Variable label: | Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? (3) |
| Pre-question text: | What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? |
| Literal question: | 3: |
| Post-question: | Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10099] [Range:-] |
r29_pcldpk
| Variable label: | Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic party |
| Pre-question text: | We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. |
| Literal question: | The Christian Democratic Party |
| Post-question: | Click on your desired answer |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intensely dislike | 1213 | 12.0% | 0.12011090 |
| 2 | Really dislike | 1793 | 17.8% | 0.17754233 |
| 3 | Dislike somewhat | 2261 | 22.4% | 0.22388355 |
| 4 | Neither like nor dislike | 2452 | 24.3% | 0.24279632 |
| 5 | Like somewhat | 1721 | 17.0% | 0.17041291 |
| 6 | Really like | 443 | 4.4% | 0.04386573 |
| 7 | Intensely like | 114 | 1.1% | 0.01128825 |
| 97 | Not answered | 102 | 1.0% | 0.01010001 |
r29_pcldph
| Variable label: | Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party |
| Pre-question text: | We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. |
| Literal question: | The Conservative Party |
| Post-question: | Click on your desired answer |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intensely dislike | 558 | 5.5% | 0.055252995 |
| 2 | Really dislike | 1421 | 14.1% | 0.140707001 |
| 3 | Dislike somewhat | 1858 | 18.4% | 0.183978612 |
| 4 | Neither like nor dislike | 1149 | 11.4% | 0.113773641 |
| 5 | Like somewhat | 2380 | 23.6% | 0.235666898 |
| 6 | Really like | 1969 | 19.5% | 0.194969799 |
| 7 | Intensely like | 675 | 6.7% | 0.066838301 |
| 97 | Not answered | 89 | 0.9% | 0.008812754 |
r29_pcldpf
| Variable label: | Like or dislike party: The Progress Party |
| Pre-question text: | We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. |
| Literal question: | The Progress Party |
| Post-question: | Click on your desired answer |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intensely dislike | 2684 | 26.6% | 0.26576889 |
| 2 | Really dislike | 2081 | 20.6% | 0.20606001 |
| 3 | Dislike somewhat | 1416 | 14.0% | 0.14021190 |
| 4 | Neither like nor dislike | 934 | 9.2% | 0.09248440 |
| 5 | Like somewhat | 1650 | 16.3% | 0.16338251 |
| 6 | Really like | 898 | 8.9% | 0.08891970 |
| 7 | Intensely like | 335 | 3.3% | 0.03317160 |
| 97 | Not answered | 101 | 1.0% | 0.01000099 |
r29_pcldpv
| Variable label: | Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party |
| Pre-question text: | We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. |
| Literal question: | The Liberal Party |
| Post-question: | Click on your desired answer |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intensely dislike | 556 | 5.5% | 0.05505496 |
| 2 | Really dislike | 1043 | 10.3% | 0.10327755 |
| 3 | Dislike somewhat | 1919 | 19.0% | 0.19001881 |
| 4 | Neither like nor dislike | 2629 | 26.0% | 0.26032280 |
| 5 | Like somewhat | 2705 | 26.8% | 0.26784830 |
| 6 | Really like | 944 | 9.3% | 0.09347460 |
| 7 | Intensely like | 200 | 2.0% | 0.01980394 |
| 97 | Not answered | 103 | 1.0% | 0.01019903 |
r29_pcldpsv
| Variable label: | Like or dislike party: The Socialist Left Party |
| Pre-question text: | We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. |
| Literal question: | The Socialist Left Party |
| Post-question: | Click on your desired answer |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intensely dislike | 1070 | 10.6% | 0.10595108 |
| 2 | Really dislike | 1420 | 14.1% | 0.14060798 |
| 3 | Dislike somewhat | 1528 | 15.1% | 0.15130211 |
| 4 | Neither like nor dislike | 1498 | 14.8% | 0.14833152 |
| 5 | Like somewhat | 2232 | 22.1% | 0.22101198 |
| 6 | Really like | 1636 | 16.2% | 0.16199624 |
| 7 | Intensely like | 608 | 6.0% | 0.06020398 |
| 97 | Not answered | 107 | 1.1% | 0.01059511 |
r29_pcldpsp
| Variable label: | Like or dislike party: The Centre Party |
| Pre-question text: | We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. |
| Literal question: | The Centre Party |
| Post-question: | Click on your desired answer |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intensely dislike | 1162 | 11.5% | 0.115060897 |
| 2 | Really dislike | 1952 | 19.3% | 0.193286464 |
| 3 | Dislike somewhat | 2445 | 24.2% | 0.242103179 |
| 4 | Neither like nor dislike | 2020 | 20.0% | 0.200019804 |
| 5 | Like somewhat | 1898 | 18.8% | 0.187939400 |
| 6 | Really like | 448 | 4.4% | 0.044360828 |
| 7 | Intensely like | 77 | 0.8% | 0.007624517 |
| 97 | Not answered | 97 | 1.0% | 0.009604911 |
r29_pcldpm
| Variable label: | Like or dislike party: The Green Party |
| Pre-question text: | We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. |
| Literal question: | The Green Party |
| Post-question: | Click on your desired answer |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intensely dislike | 1829 | 18.1% | 0.181107040 |
| 2 | Really dislike | 1531 | 15.2% | 0.151599168 |
| 3 | Dislike somewhat | 1658 | 16.4% | 0.164174671 |
| 4 | Neither like nor dislike | 1456 | 14.4% | 0.144172690 |
| 5 | Like somewhat | 2212 | 21.9% | 0.219031587 |
| 6 | Really like | 1043 | 10.3% | 0.103277552 |
| 7 | Intensely like | 282 | 2.8% | 0.027923557 |
| 97 | Not answered | 88 | 0.9% | 0.008713734 |
r29_pcldpa
| Variable label: | Like or dislike party: The Labour Party |
| Pre-question text: | We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. |
| Literal question: | The Labour Party |
| Post-question: | Click on your desired answer |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intensely dislike | 712 | 7.1% | 0.070502030 |
| 2 | Really dislike | 1212 | 12.0% | 0.120011882 |
| 3 | Dislike somewhat | 1826 | 18.1% | 0.180809981 |
| 4 | Neither like nor dislike | 1349 | 13.4% | 0.133577582 |
| 5 | Like somewhat | 2980 | 29.5% | 0.295078721 |
| 6 | Really like | 1656 | 16.4% | 0.163976631 |
| 7 | Intensely like | 281 | 2.8% | 0.027824537 |
| 97 | Not answered | 83 | 0.8% | 0.008218636 |
r29_pcldpr
| Variable label: | Like or dislike party: The Red Party |
| Pre-question text: | We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. |
| Literal question: | The Red Party |
| Post-question: | Click on your desired answer |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intensely dislike | 1924 | 19.1% | 0.19051391 |
| 2 | Really dislike | 1609 | 15.9% | 0.15932271 |
| 3 | Dislike somewhat | 1505 | 14.9% | 0.14902466 |
| 4 | Neither like nor dislike | 1425 | 14.1% | 0.14110308 |
| 5 | Like somewhat | 2145 | 21.2% | 0.21239727 |
| 6 | Really like | 1025 | 10.1% | 0.10149520 |
| 7 | Intensely like | 365 | 3.6% | 0.03614219 |
| 97 | Not answered | 101 | 1.0% | 0.01000099 |
r29_pcecz
| Variable label: | Assessment of: The financial situation in Norway in a year |
| Literal question: | What do you think about the financial situation in Norway in a year? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Much better than today | 71 | 0.7% | 0.007030399 |
| 4 | Better than today | 2965 | 29.4% | 0.293593425 |
| 3 | Neither worse nor better than today | 4683 | 46.4% | 0.463709278 |
| 2 | Worse than today | 2112 | 20.9% | 0.209129617 |
| 1 | Much worse than today | 206 | 2.0% | 0.020398059 |
| 97 | Not answered | 62 | 0.6% | 0.006139222 |
r29_dcd_ran
| Variable label: | Experiment: Conditional randomization: 3/5 of the respondents get [r29_dvase], 1/5 gets [r29_ceinjo], and 1/5 gets [r29_dmptrx]. |
| Literal question: | Experiment: Conditional randomization: 3/5 of the respondents get [r29_dvase], 1/5 gets [r29_ceinjo], and 1/5 gets [r29_dmptrx]. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [Randomized for all respondents] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [r29_dvase] | 6214 | 61.5% | 0.6153084 |
| 2 | [r29_ceinjo] | 1923 | 19.0% | 0.1904149 |
| 3 | [r29_dmptrx] | 1962 | 19.4% | 0.1942767 |
r29_dvase_1
| Variable label: | Your experience with asylum seekers: Greeted some of the asylum seekers. |
| Pre-question text: | Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have: |
| Literal question: | Greeted some of the asylum seekers. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[Asked if (r29_dcd_ran = 1)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yes | 2409 | 38.8% | 0.38767300 |
| 2 | No | 2939 | 47.3% | 0.47296427 |
| 3 | Not relevant | 780 | 12.6% | 0.12552301 |
| 97 | Not answered | 86 | 1.4% | 0.01383972 |
| 98 | Not asked | 3885 |
r29_dvase_2
| Variable label: | Your experience with asylum seekers: Had contact via the internet with asylum seekers |
| Pre-question text: | Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have: |
| Literal question: | Had contact via the internet with asylum seekers (for example Facebook or Finn). |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[Asked if (r29_dcd_ran = 1)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yes | 688 | 11.1% | 0.11071773 |
| 2 | No | 4392 | 70.7% | 0.70679112 |
| 3 | Not relevant | 1015 | 16.3% | 0.16334084 |
| 97 | Not answered | 119 | 1.9% | 0.01915031 |
| 98 | Not asked | 3885 |
r29_dvase_3
| Variable label: | Your experience with asylum seekers: Become friends with some of the asylum seekers. |
| Pre-question text: | Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have: |
| Literal question: | Become friends with some of the asylum seekers. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[Asked if (r29_dcd_ran = 1)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yes | 754 | 12.1% | 0.12133891 |
| 2 | No | 4804 | 77.3% | 0.77309302 |
| 3 | Not relevant | 548 | 8.8% | 0.08818796 |
| 97 | Not answered | 108 | 1.7% | 0.01738011 |
| 98 | Not asked | 3885 |
r29_dvase_4
| Variable label: | Your experience with asylum seekers: Become a member of a support group for asylum seekers |
| Pre-question text: | Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have: |
| Literal question: | Become a member of a support group for asylum seekers (for example on the internet). |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[Asked if (r29_dcd_ran = 1)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yes | 187 | 3.0% | 0.03009334 |
| 2 | No | 4745 | 76.4% | 0.76359833 |
| 3 | Not relevant | 1158 | 18.6% | 0.18635340 |
| 97 | Not answered | 124 | 2.0% | 0.01995494 |
| 98 | Not asked | 3885 |
r29_dvase_5
| Variable label: | Your experience with asylum seekers: Expressed scepticism towards asylum seekers to others. |
| Pre-question text: | Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have: |
| Literal question: | Expressed scepticism towards asylum seekers to others. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[Asked if (r29_dcd_ran = 1)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yes | 2316 | 37.3% | 0.37270679 |
| 2 | No | 3175 | 51.1% | 0.51094303 |
| 3 | Not relevant | 623 | 10.0% | 0.10025748 |
| 97 | Not answered | 100 | 1.6% | 0.01609269 |
| 98 | Not asked | 3885 |
r29_dvaso
| Variable label: | I have other experiences. Please write: |
| Pre-question text: | I have other experiences. |
| Literal question: | Please write: |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[Asked if (r29_dcd_ran = 1)] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10099] [Range:-] |
r29_ceinjo
| Variable label: | Injustice in relation to climate change: What do you think might be unfair? |
| Literal question: | There is sometimes talk of injustice in relation to climate change. What, if anything, do you think might be unjust? |
| Post-question: | Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you prefer. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[Asked if (r29_dcd_ran = 2)] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10099] [Range:-] |
r29_dmptrx_ran1
| Variable label: | Experiment: Decides random element for text piping in [r29_dmptrx]. |
| Literal question: | Experiment: Decides random element for text piping in [r29_dmptrx]. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [Randomized if (r29_dcd_ran = 3)] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1962] [Invalid:8137] [Range:1-2] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | , for example The Labour Party, | 972 | 49.5% | 0.4954128 |
| 2 | , for example The Conservative Party, | 990 | 50.5% | 0.5045872 |
| Sysmiss | 8137 |
r29_dmptrx_ran2
| Variable label: | Experiment: Decides random element for text piping in [r29_dmptrx]. |
| Literal question: | Experiment: Decides random element for text piping in [r29_dmptrx]. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [Randomized if (r29_dcd_ran = 3)] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1962] [Invalid:8137] [Range:1-3] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | male politician | 658 | 33.5% | 0.3353721 |
| 2 | female politician | 635 | 32.4% | 0.3236493 |
| 3 | politician | 669 | 34.1% | 0.3409786 |
| Sysmiss | 8137 |
r29_dmptrx_1
| Variable label: | Able to become a minister after: given fraudulent information about commuter expenses/commuter accommodation |
| Pre-question text: | We want to know what Norwegian citizens think about the political future of politicians who break ethical guidelines. How much do you agree or disagree that a [r29_dmptrx_ran1] allows a [r29_dmptrx_ran2] to become a minister after having … |
| Literal question: | … given fraudulent information about commuter expenses/commuter accommodation |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[Asked if (r29_dcd_ran = 3)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Completely agree | 62 | 3.2% | 0.03160041 |
| 2 | Agree somewhat | 75 | 3.8% | 0.03822630 |
| 3 | Neither agree nor disagree | 140 | 7.1% | 0.07135576 |
| 4 | Slightly disagree | 453 | 23.1% | 0.23088685 |
| 5 | Completely disagree | 1212 | 61.8% | 0.61773700 |
| 97 | Not answered | 20 | 1.0% | 0.01019368 |
| 98 | Not asked | 8137 |
r29_dmptrx_2
| Variable label: | Able to become a minister after: given friends an advantage in awarding public office |
| Pre-question text: | We want to know what Norwegian citizens think about the political future of politicians who break ethical guidelines. How much do you agree or disagree that a [r29_dmptrx_ran1] allows a [r29_dmptrx_ran2] to become a minister after having … |
| Literal question: | … given friends an advantage in awarding public office |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[Asked if (r29_dcd_ran = 3)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Completely agree | 60 | 3.1% | 0.030581040 |
| 2 | Agree somewhat | 52 | 2.7% | 0.026503568 |
| 3 | Neither agree nor disagree | 102 | 5.2% | 0.051987768 |
| 4 | Slightly disagree | 418 | 21.3% | 0.213047910 |
| 5 | Completely disagree | 1311 | 66.8% | 0.668195719 |
| 97 | Not answered | 19 | 1.0% | 0.009683996 |
| 98 | Not asked | 8137 |
r29_dmptrx_3
| Variable label: | Able to become a minister after: failed to assess their own impartiality when buying shares |
| Pre-question text: | We want to know what Norwegian citizens think about the political future of politicians who break ethical guidelines. How much do you agree or disagree that a [r29_dmptrx_ran1] allows a [r29_dmptrx_ran2] to become a minister after having … |
| Literal question: | … failed to assess their own impartiality when buying shares |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[Asked if (r29_dcd_ran = 3)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Completely agree | 70 | 3.6% | 0.035677880 |
| 2 | Agree somewhat | 76 | 3.9% | 0.038735984 |
| 3 | Neither agree nor disagree | 165 | 8.4% | 0.084097859 |
| 4 | Slightly disagree | 521 | 26.6% | 0.265545362 |
| 5 | Completely disagree | 1116 | 56.9% | 0.568807339 |
| 97 | Not answered | 14 | 0.7% | 0.007135576 |
| 98 | Not asked | 8137 |
r29_dmptrx_4
| Variable label: | Able to become a minister after: exposed younger colleagues in politics to unwanted sexual harassment |
| Pre-question text: | We want to know what Norwegian citizens think about the political future of politicians who break ethical guidelines. How much do you agree or disagree that a [r29_dmptrx_ran1] allows a [r29_dmptrx_ran2] to become a minister after having … |
| Literal question: | … exposed younger colleagues in politics to unwanted sexual harassment |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[Asked if (r29_dcd_ran = 3)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Completely agree | 56 | 2.9% | 0.02854230 |
| 2 | Agree somewhat | 54 | 2.8% | 0.02752294 |
| 3 | Neither agree nor disagree | 114 | 5.8% | 0.05810398 |
| 4 | Slightly disagree | 234 | 11.9% | 0.11926606 |
| 5 | Completely disagree | 1484 | 75.6% | 0.75637105 |
| 97 | Not answered | 20 | 1.0% | 0.01019368 |
| 98 | Not asked | 8137 |
r29_dmptrx_5
| Variable label: | Able to become a minister after: spread false rumors about a party colleague in the public |
| Pre-question text: | We want to know what Norwegian citizens think about the political future of politicians who break ethical guidelines. How much do you agree or disagree that a [r29_dmptrx_ran1] allows a [r29_dmptrx_ran2] to become a minister after having … |
| Literal question: | … spread false rumors about a party colleague in the public |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[Asked if (r29_dcd_ran = 3)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Completely agree | 52 | 2.7% | 0.02650357 |
| 2 | Agree somewhat | 49 | 2.5% | 0.02497452 |
| 3 | Neither agree nor disagree | 174 | 8.9% | 0.08868502 |
| 4 | Slightly disagree | 432 | 22.0% | 0.22018349 |
| 5 | Completely disagree | 1234 | 62.9% | 0.62895005 |
| 97 | Not answered | 21 | 1.1% | 0.01070336 |
| 98 | Not asked | 8137 |
r29_pcsad
| Variable label: | How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway? |
| Literal question: | How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Very satisfied | 1041 | 10.3% | 0.103079513 |
| 2 | Satisfied | 4846 | 48.0% | 0.479849490 |
| 3 | Somewhat satisfied | 2736 | 27.1% | 0.270917913 |
| 4 | Dissatisfied | 1106 | 11.0% | 0.109515794 |
| 5 | Not satisfied at all | 351 | 3.5% | 0.034755916 |
| 97 | Not answered | 19 | 0.2% | 0.001881374 |
r29_pcsag
| Variable label: | How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway? |
| Literal question: | How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Very satisfied | 143 | 1.4% | 0.01415982 |
| 2 | Satisfied | 1691 | 16.7% | 0.16744232 |
| 3 | Somewhat satisfied | 3332 | 33.0% | 0.32993366 |
| 4 | Dissatisfied | 3203 | 31.7% | 0.31716011 |
| 5 | Not satisfied at all | 1534 | 15.2% | 0.15189623 |
| 97 | Not answered | 196 | 1.9% | 0.01940786 |
r29_pccoo
| Variable label: | Most people in general can be trusted |
| Literal question: | Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 - Cannot be careful enough | 40 | 0.4% | 0.003960788 |
| 1 | 1 | 81 | 0.8% | 0.008020596 |
| 2 | 2 | 169 | 1.7% | 0.016734330 |
| 3 | 3 | 380 | 3.8% | 0.037627488 |
| 4 | 4 | 405 | 4.0% | 0.040102980 |
| 5 | 5 | 810 | 8.0% | 0.080205961 |
| 6 | 6 | 1055 | 10.4% | 0.104465789 |
| 7 | 7 | 2554 | 25.3% | 0.252896326 |
| 8 | 8 | 3187 | 31.6% | 0.315575800 |
| 9 | 9 | 1067 | 10.6% | 0.105654025 |
| 10 | 10 – Most people can be trusted | 315 | 3.1% | 0.031191207 |
| 97 | Not answered | 36 | 0.4% | 0.003564709 |
r29_pcsaf
| Variable label: | How much safer or more unsafe has your local environment become |
| Literal question: |
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years. How much safer or more unsafe has it become? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Much safer | 80 | 0.8% | 0.007921576 |
| 2 | Somewhat safer | 429 | 4.2% | 0.042479453 |
| 3 | No change in safety | 7319 | 72.5% | 0.724725220 |
| 4 | Somewhat more unsafe | 2036 | 20.2% | 0.201604119 |
| 5 | Much more unsafe | 214 | 2.1% | 0.021190217 |
| 97 | Not answered | 21 | 0.2% | 0.002079414 |
r29_pceco
| Variable label: | Assessment of: Your own financial situation today |
| Literal question: | How would you assess your own financial situation today? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Very good | 1058 | 10.5% | 0.104762848 |
| 2 | Good | 4404 | 43.6% | 0.436082780 |
| 3 | Quite good | 1956 | 19.4% | 0.193682543 |
| 4 | Neither good nor bad | 1453 | 14.4% | 0.143875631 |
| 5 | Quite bad | 803 | 8.0% | 0.079512823 |
| 6 | Bad | 301 | 3.0% | 0.029804931 |
| 7 | Very bad | 83 | 0.8% | 0.008218636 |
| 97 | Not answered | 41 | 0.4% | 0.004059808 |
r29_pcecy
| Variable label: | Assessment of: Your own financial situation in a year |
| Literal question: | How would you assess your own financial situation in a year? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Much worse than today | 75 | 0.7% | 0.007426478 |
| 2 | Worse than today | 1296 | 12.8% | 0.128329538 |
| 3 | Neither worse nor better than today | 6900 | 68.3% | 0.683235964 |
| 4 | Better than today | 1701 | 16.8% | 0.168432518 |
| 5 | Much better than today | 89 | 0.9% | 0.008812754 |
| 97 | Not answered | 38 | 0.4% | 0.003762749 |
r29_pc22j
| Variable label: | How often do you read about, think or talk about something related to 22. july? |
| Literal question: |
It’s now been more than ten years since the attacks of 22 July 2011. When it comes to you personally, how often would you say that you now think about, read or talk about something that is related to 22 July? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daily | 45 | 0.4% | 0.004455887 |
| 2 | Weekly | 377 | 3.7% | 0.037330429 |
| 3 | A couple of times a month | 1904 | 18.9% | 0.188533518 |
| 4 | Less often, but it happens | 6672 | 66.1% | 0.660659471 |
| 5 | Never | 1062 | 10.5% | 0.105158927 |
| 97 | Not answered | 39 | 0.4% | 0.003861768 |
r29_pccop
| Variable label: | Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians? |
| Literal question: | Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A very high degree | 166 | 1.6% | 0.016437271 |
| 2 | A high degree | 2990 | 29.6% | 0.296068918 |
| 3 | Some degree | 4551 | 45.1% | 0.450638677 |
| 4 | A low degree | 1825 | 18.1% | 0.180710961 |
| 5 | Not at all | 517 | 5.1% | 0.051193187 |
| 97 | Not answered | 50 | 0.5% | 0.004950985 |
r29_pccos
| Variable label: | What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)? |
| Literal question: | What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A very high degree | 511 | 5.1% | 0.05059907 |
| 2 | A high degree | 4089 | 40.5% | 0.40489157 |
| 3 | Some degree | 3829 | 37.9% | 0.37914645 |
| 4 | A low degree | 1186 | 11.7% | 0.11743737 |
| 5 | Not at all | 376 | 3.7% | 0.03723141 |
| 97 | Not answered | 108 | 1.1% | 0.01069413 |
r29_pccom
| Variable label: | What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media? |
| Literal question: | What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A very high degree | 444 | 4.4% | 0.043964749 |
| 2 | A high degree | 4063 | 40.2% | 0.402317061 |
| 3 | Some degree | 4047 | 40.1% | 0.400732746 |
| 4 | A low degree | 1140 | 11.3% | 0.112882464 |
| 5 | Not at all | 324 | 3.2% | 0.032082384 |
| 97 | Not answered | 81 | 0.8% | 0.008020596 |
r29_pcecs
| Variable label: | Perception of current economic situation |
| Literal question: |
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? Do you think it is: |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Very good | 786 | 7.8% | 0.07782949 |
| 2 | Good | 3590 | 35.5% | 0.35548074 |
| 3 | Quite good | 2398 | 23.7% | 0.23744925 |
| 4 | Neither good nor bad | 1137 | 11.3% | 0.11258540 |
| 5 | Quite bad | 1575 | 15.6% | 0.15595604 |
| 6 | Bad | 466 | 4.6% | 0.04614318 |
| 7 | Very bad | 112 | 1.1% | 0.01109021 |
| 97 | Not answered | 35 | 0.3% | 0.00346569 |
r29_pcrew
| Variable label: | Agree/Disagree: Large gaps in income are necessary in order to reward talent and effort |
| Literal question: |
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements: Large differences in people’s incomes are necessary in order to reward talent and effort. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strongly agree | 170 | 1.7% | 0.01683335 |
| 2 | Agree | 863 | 8.5% | 0.08545401 |
| 3 | Agree somewhat | 2652 | 26.3% | 0.26260026 |
| 4 | Neither agree nor disagree | 955 | 9.5% | 0.09456382 |
| 5 | Disagree somewhat | 2006 | 19.9% | 0.19863353 |
| 6 | Disagree | 2107 | 20.9% | 0.20863452 |
| 7 | Strongly disagree | 1313 | 13.0% | 0.13001287 |
| 97 | Not answered | 33 | 0.3% | 0.00326765 |
r29_pcgro
| Variable label: | Agree/disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of industry, despite conflict with environmental interests. |
| Literal question: |
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion: Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strongly agree | 409 | 4.0% | 0.040499059 |
| 2 | Agree | 1044 | 10.3% | 0.103376572 |
| 3 | Agree somewhat | 2231 | 22.1% | 0.220912962 |
| 4 | Neither agree nor disagree | 1040 | 10.3% | 0.102980493 |
| 5 | Disagree somewhat | 2258 | 22.4% | 0.223586494 |
| 6 | Disagree | 1928 | 19.1% | 0.190909991 |
| 7 | Strongly disagree | 1125 | 11.1% | 0.111397168 |
| 97 | Not answered | 64 | 0.6% | 0.006337261 |
r29_pccen
| Variable label: | In general, which of the statements to do agree the most with? |
| Literal question: | Generally speaking, which of the following statements do you agree with the most: |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Answer list display order: Randomized] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | There should be larger and fewer public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts. | 3591 | 35.6% | 0.35557976 |
| 2 | There should be smaller and more public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts. | 6264 | 62.0% | 0.62025943 |
| 97 | Not answered | 244 | 2.4% | 0.02416081 |
r29_cered
| Variable label: | Agree/Disagree: Citizens of rich countries should reduce their consumption |
| Literal question: |
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The inhabitants of rich countries such as Norway should reduce their consumption in order to help solve our climate challenges. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strongly agree | 1925 | 19.1% | 0.190612932 |
| 2 | Agree | 2756 | 27.3% | 0.272898307 |
| 3 | Agree somewhat | 2837 | 28.1% | 0.280918903 |
| 4 | Neither agree nor disagree | 1002 | 9.9% | 0.099217744 |
| 5 | Disagree somewhat | 653 | 6.5% | 0.064659867 |
| 6 | Disagree | 522 | 5.2% | 0.051688286 |
| 7 | Strongly disagree | 353 | 3.5% | 0.034953956 |
| 97 | Not answered | 51 | 0.5% | 0.005050005 |
r29_pcpri
| Variable label: | Agree/disagree: The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy. |
| Literal question: |
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition: The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strongly agree | 802 | 7.9% | 0.079413803 |
| 2 | Agree | 2338 | 23.2% | 0.231508070 |
| 3 | Agree somewhat | 3217 | 31.9% | 0.318546391 |
| 4 | Neither agree nor disagree | 1281 | 12.7% | 0.126844242 |
| 5 | Disagree somewhat | 1257 | 12.4% | 0.124467769 |
| 6 | Disagree | 785 | 7.8% | 0.077730468 |
| 7 | Strongly disagree | 337 | 3.3% | 0.033369641 |
| 97 | Not answered | 82 | 0.8% | 0.008119616 |
r29_pcoil
| Variable label: | Development of the oil and gas industry in Norway. In 10 to 15 years, the industry should be… |
| Literal question: |
There is frequent debate about how the oil and gas industry in Norway should be developed over the next 10 to 15 years. Which of the following options is closest to your view? In 10 to 15 years, the industry should be … |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | As large as possible | 558 | 5.5% | 0.055252995 |
| 2 | Larger than today | 598 | 5.9% | 0.059213784 |
| 3 | Just as large as today | 3433 | 34.0% | 0.339934647 |
| 4 | Smaller than today | 3695 | 36.6% | 0.365877810 |
| 5 | As small as possible | 1730 | 17.1% | 0.171304090 |
| 97 | Not answered | 85 | 0.8% | 0.008416675 |
r29_cpres
| Variable label: | Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality. |
| Literal question: | To what extent do you agree or disgree with the following statement: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strongly agree | 1272 | 12.6% | 0.125953065 |
| 2 | Agree | 3262 | 32.3% | 0.323002277 |
| 3 | Agree somewhat | 3318 | 32.9% | 0.328547381 |
| 4 | Neither agree nor disagree | 1104 | 10.9% | 0.109317754 |
| 5 | Disagree somewhat | 669 | 6.6% | 0.066244183 |
| 6 | Disagree | 296 | 2.9% | 0.029309833 |
| 7 | Strongly disagree | 103 | 1.0% | 0.010199030 |
| 97 | Not answered | 75 | 0.7% | 0.007426478 |
r29_pcmsc
| Variable label: | Agree/disagree: It should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools. |
| Literal question: |
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith. How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strongly agree | 227 | 2.2% | 0.022477473 |
| 2 | Agree | 997 | 9.9% | 0.098722646 |
| 3 | Agree somewhat | 1275 | 12.6% | 0.126250124 |
| 4 | Neither agree nor disagree | 1742 | 17.2% | 0.172492326 |
| 5 | Disagree somewhat | 1377 | 13.6% | 0.136350134 |
| 6 | Disagree | 2002 | 19.8% | 0.198237449 |
| 7 | Strongly disagree | 2393 | 23.7% | 0.236954154 |
| 97 | Not answered | 86 | 0.9% | 0.008515695 |
r29_pcmsc_txt
| Variable label: | Open: Comments to [r29_pcmsc]. Showed on the same page as [r29_pcmsc]. |
| Literal question: | If you have comments to the question, you can write them here. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: |
[All respondents asked] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Open] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10099] [Range:-] |
r29_pcwet
| Variable label: | Agree/Disagree: The wealth tax should be abolished |
| Literal question: |
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition: The wealth tax should be abolished. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strongly agree | 1448 | 14.3% | 0.143380533 |
| 2 | Agree | 1442 | 14.3% | 0.142786414 |
| 3 | Agree somewhat | 1698 | 16.8% | 0.168135459 |
| 4 | Neither agree nor disagree | 1424 | 14.1% | 0.141004060 |
| 5 | Disagree somewhat | 1429 | 14.1% | 0.141499158 |
| 6 | Disagree | 1722 | 17.1% | 0.170511932 |
| 7 | Strongly disagree | 842 | 8.3% | 0.083374592 |
| 97 | Not answered | 94 | 0.9% | 0.009307852 |
r29_cewip_1
| Variable label: | Agree/disagree: More onshore wind power should be developed in Norway. |
| Pre-question text: | To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements |
| Literal question: | More onshore wind power should be developed in Norway. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strongly agree | 708 | 7.0% | 0.07010595 |
| 2 | Agree | 1415 | 14.0% | 0.14011288 |
| 3 | Agree somewhat | 2185 | 21.6% | 0.21635806 |
| 4 | Neither agree nor disagree | 1144 | 11.3% | 0.11327854 |
| 5 | Disagree somewhat | 1324 | 13.1% | 0.13110209 |
| 6 | Disagree | 1392 | 13.8% | 0.13783543 |
| 7 | Strongly disagree | 1824 | 18.1% | 0.18061194 |
| 97 | Not answered | 107 | 1.1% | 0.01059511 |
r29_cewip_2
| Variable label: | Agree/disagree: More offshore wind power should be developed in Norway. |
| Pre-question text: | To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements |
| Literal question: | More offshore wind power should be developed in Norway. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strongly agree | 1323 | 13.1% | 0.13100307 |
| 2 | Agree | 2645 | 26.2% | 0.26190712 |
| 3 | Agree somewhat | 2438 | 24.1% | 0.24141004 |
| 4 | Neither agree nor disagree | 1119 | 11.1% | 0.11080305 |
| 5 | Disagree somewhat | 686 | 6.8% | 0.06792752 |
| 6 | Disagree | 695 | 6.9% | 0.06881869 |
| 7 | Strongly disagree | 1076 | 10.7% | 0.10654520 |
| 97 | Not answered | 117 | 1.2% | 0.01158531 |
r29_pcinc
| Variable label: | Agree/disagree: The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society |
| Literal question: |
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following suggestion: The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society to greater extent. |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strongly agree | 2384 | 23.6% | 0.236062977 |
| 2 | Agree | 2818 | 27.9% | 0.279037528 |
| 3 | Agree somewhat | 2417 | 23.9% | 0.239330627 |
| 4 | Neither agree nor disagree | 1040 | 10.3% | 0.102980493 |
| 5 | Disagree somewhat | 772 | 7.6% | 0.076443212 |
| 6 | Disagree | 437 | 4.3% | 0.043271611 |
| 7 | Strongly disagree | 145 | 1.4% | 0.014357857 |
| 97 | Not answered | 86 | 0.9% | 0.008515695 |
r29_pcimm
| Variable label: | Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here |
| Literal question: | In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A very great advantage | 370 | 3.7% | 0.036637291 |
| 2 | A great advantage | 1811 | 17.9% | 0.179324686 |
| 3 | A slight advantage | 4275 | 42.3% | 0.423309239 |
| 4 | Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage | 1313 | 13.0% | 0.130012873 |
| 5 | A slight disadvantage | 1506 | 14.9% | 0.149123676 |
| 6 | A great disadvantage | 490 | 4.9% | 0.048519655 |
| 7 | A very great disadvantage | 250 | 2.5% | 0.024754926 |
| 97 | Not answered | 84 | 0.8% | 0.008317655 |
r29_pcldi
| Variable label: | Like/dislike: immigrants in Norway |
| Literal question: | In general, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in Norway? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intensely dislike | 108 | 1.1% | 0.01069413 |
| 2 | Really dislike | 240 | 2.4% | 0.02376473 |
| 3 | Dislike somewhat | 916 | 9.1% | 0.09070205 |
| 4 | Neither dislike nor like | 3343 | 33.1% | 0.33102287 |
| 5 | Like somewhat | 2798 | 27.7% | 0.27705713 |
| 6 | Really like | 2187 | 21.7% | 0.21655609 |
| 7 | Intensely like | 383 | 3.8% | 0.03792455 |
| 97 | Not answered | 124 | 1.2% | 0.01227844 |
r29_pcref
| Variable label: | Your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum. |
| Literal question: | What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be: |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Much easier | 145 | 1.4% | 0.014357857 |
| 2 | Easier | 698 | 6.9% | 0.069115754 |
| 3 | Somewhat easier | 1439 | 14.2% | 0.142489355 |
| 4 | Same as today | 4151 | 41.1% | 0.411030795 |
| 5 | Slightly more difficult | 1967 | 19.5% | 0.194771760 |
| 6 | More difficult | 917 | 9.1% | 0.090801069 |
| 7 | Much more difficult | 688 | 6.8% | 0.068125557 |
| 97 | Not answered | 94 | 0.9% | 0.009307852 |
r29_pcint
| Variable label: | As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees? |
| Literal question: | As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Very good | 430 | 4.3% | 0.04257847 |
| 2 | Good | 2599 | 25.7% | 0.25735221 |
| 3 | Somewhat good | 2385 | 23.6% | 0.23616200 |
| 4 | Neither good nor bad | 1191 | 11.8% | 0.11793247 |
| 5 | Somewhat poor | 2003 | 19.8% | 0.19833647 |
| 6 | Poor | 1034 | 10.2% | 0.10238637 |
| 7 | Very poor | 343 | 3.4% | 0.03396376 |
| 97 | Not answered | 114 | 1.1% | 0.01128825 |
r29_pceum
| Variable label: | How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership? |
| Literal question: | How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Very positive | 1139 | 11.3% | 0.112783444 |
| 2 | Positive | 1669 | 16.5% | 0.165263888 |
| 3 | Somewhat positive | 1474 | 14.6% | 0.145955045 |
| 4 | Neither positive nor negative | 1138 | 11.3% | 0.112684424 |
| 5 | Somewhat negative | 1447 | 14.3% | 0.143281513 |
| 6 | Negative | 1589 | 15.7% | 0.157342311 |
| 7 | Very negative | 1567 | 15.5% | 0.155163878 |
| 97 | Not answered | 76 | 0.8% | 0.007525498 |
r29_pceea
| Variable label: | How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway? |
| Literal question: | How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A very great advantage | 1300 | 12.9% | 0.12872562 |
| 2 | A great advantage | 2534 | 25.1% | 0.25091593 |
| 3 | A slight advantage | 2977 | 29.5% | 0.29478166 |
| 4 | Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage | 1031 | 10.2% | 0.10208932 |
| 5 | A slight disadvantage | 1215 | 12.0% | 0.12030894 |
| 6 | A great disadvantage | 558 | 5.5% | 0.05525300 |
| 7 | A very great disadvantage | 335 | 3.3% | 0.03317160 |
| 97 | Not answered | 149 | 1.5% | 0.01475394 |
r29_innae
| Variable label: | How do you rate the increased military presence of NATO in Eastern Europe? |
| Literal question: | NATO has recently increased its military forces and military equipment in Eastern Europe considerably. How do you rate the increased military presence in Eastern Europe? |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Very positively | 2898 | 28.7% | 0.286959105 |
| 2 | Somewhat positively | 3471 | 34.4% | 0.343697396 |
| 3 | Neither positively, nor negatively | 1276 | 12.6% | 0.126349143 |
| 4 | Somewhat negatively | 1126 | 11.1% | 0.111496188 |
| 5 | Very negatively | 626 | 6.2% | 0.061986335 |
| 6 | Don't know | 604 | 6.0% | 0.059807902 |
| 97 | Not answered | 98 | 1.0% | 0.009703931 |
r29_pcnat
| Variable label: | Norways membership status in NATO |
| Literal question: | Which of the following alternatives is closest to your point of view: |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norway should continue to be a member of NATO. | 9656 | 95.6% | 0.95613427 |
| 2 | Norway should opt out of NATO. | 332 | 3.3% | 0.03287454 |
| 97 | Not answered | 111 | 1.1% | 0.01099119 |
r29_bginc_v2
| Variable label: | Current gross annual income? |
| Literal question: | What is your current income? Gross annual income is: |
| Field period: | 15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024 |
| Technical description: | [All respondents asked] |
| Technical attributes: | [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10099] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10] |
| Value | Label | Cases | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Less than 300 000 NOK | 828 | 8.2% | 0.08198832 |
| 2 | 300 001 - 400 000 NOK | 1474 | 14.6% | 0.14595505 |
| 3 | 400 001 - 500 000 NOK | 1561 | 15.5% | 0.15456976 |