Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Sveinung Arnesen, Bjarte Folkestad, Endre Tvinnereim, Åsta Dyrnes Nordø,
Mikael Poul Johannesson, Erik Knudsen, Nina Serdarevic
|
Scientific team, University of Bergen and UNI Research Rokkan Centre
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in two waves,
wave 1 and wave 3. In wave 1 4.870 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 1). In wave 3 5.623 members were recruited.
Prior to wave 7 the Norwegian Citizen Panel had 10,179 members. The
sampling procedure of wave and wave 1 is identical. 25 000 individuals
over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the Norwegian National
Population Registry. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name,
c) address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a online questionnaire. Existing members receives
e-mail invitations asking for their participation in the current wave.
New panel members were recruited in multiple steps.
First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters
contained the following information: a) a description of the project, b)
the Citizen Panel’s policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the
anonymity of the participants, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the
participants’ rights to opt of the panel at any time in the future, e)
contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a
unique log-in id and the web address to the panel’s web site and g) the
estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).
Prosepective respondents in the sample that did not register as a panel
member after a certain time period recieved a reminder sent as a post
card
In the second recruitment round all respondents that had not accessed or
completed the survey after receiving both a letter and a post card were
sent a reminder to their mobile phones (depending on whether or not they
were registered with a phone number in the Population Register). A
randomly drawn subset of the gross sample were also contacted via a
telephone call.
The invitation was emailed on the 01st of November 2016.
Three reminders were sent at the following dates: 03rd of November, 08th
of November, and 11th of November. The reminder was sent to those who a)
had not entered the questionnaire, and b) had not completed the
questionnaire. Panel members with registered phone number received the
last of these reminders as a text message. Panel members without
registered phone number received the reminder as an email.
Wave 7 was closed 01st of December.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix). When
calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s
geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These
attributes were included in the sample file we received from the
Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of
education is provided by the respondents when answering the
questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer
this question. Because of this, two different weights have been
calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-103
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 7
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r7Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r7Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r7Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-102
|
2020-08-25
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 7
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-24
|
r7k33
|
Corrected
interviewer instruction
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-24
|
r7k34_1
- r7k34_21
|
Questions
were inadvertently given to the wrong sample of respondents. Corrected
documentation
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k33
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k33_9_other
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_3
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_4
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_5
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_6
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_7
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_8
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_9
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_10
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_11
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_12
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_13
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_14
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_15
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_16
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_17
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_18
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_19
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_20
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_21
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_21_other
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 7
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r7p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r7p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-19
|
r7p3
|
Updated the value of 1 respondent.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r7p4_1
|
Corrected values of 23 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r7p4_2
|
Corrected values of 23 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r7_weight_2
|
Corrected values of 23 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-11-28
|
r7k13
|
Removed technical documentation
|
|
NA
|
2017-11-28
|
r7k33
|
Removed technical documentation
|
|
NA
|
2017-11-28
|
r7k33_9_other
|
Removed technical documentation
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-01
|
r7pad6
|
Recoded variables from string to numerics.
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-01
|
r7pad7
|
Recoded variables from string to numerics.
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-01
|
r7pad8
|
Recoded variables from string to numerics.
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-01
|
r7pad14
|
Recoded variables from string to numerics.
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-01
|
r7selexp2
|
Recoded variables from string to numerics.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
r7p4_1
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
r7p4_2
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r7km1a
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r7km1b
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r7km1c
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
v-100
|
2016-12-16
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 7
|
|
NA
|
2016-12-15
|
r7municipalsize
|
New variable.
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 7 - v-103-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
4689
|
|
# Variables
|
614
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7u
|
Variable label:
|
Respondent sub-group
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
U1 |
1184 |
25.3% |
0.2525059 |
| 2 |
U2 |
1199 |
25.6% |
0.2557048 |
| 3 |
U3 |
1103 |
23.5% |
0.2352314 |
| 4 |
U4 |
1203 |
25.7% |
0.2565579 |
r7recruited
|
Variable label:
|
Recruitment wave
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
2190 |
46.7% |
0.4670505 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
2499 |
53.3% |
0.5329495 |
r7browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7mobile
|
Variable label:
|
Determines if the respondents uses mobile
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
3396 |
72.4% |
0.7242482 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
1293 |
27.6% |
0.2757518 |
r7deviceResolution
|
Variable label:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7device
|
Variable label:
|
Determines respondents device type.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
3463 |
73.9% |
0.738537001 |
| 2 |
Touch |
1217 |
26.0% |
0.259543613 |
| 3 |
Generic |
9 |
0.2% |
0.001919386 |
r7advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7ktilfreds_1
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Life at the moment
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied
are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Life at the moment?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
1121 |
23.9% |
0.239070164 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2687 |
57.3% |
0.573043293 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
636 |
13.6% |
0.135636596 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
195 |
4.2% |
0.041586692 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
30 |
0.6% |
0.006397953 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
0.4% |
0.004265302 |
r7ktilfreds_2
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Your personal economy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied
are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your personal economy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
820 |
17.5% |
0.17487737 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2616 |
55.8% |
0.55790147 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
787 |
16.8% |
0.16783962 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
317 |
6.8% |
0.06760503 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
83 |
1.8% |
0.01770100 |
| 97 |
No answer |
66 |
1.4% |
0.01407550 |
r7ktilfreds_3
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: The government in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied
are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
183 |
3.9% |
0.03902751 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1362 |
29.0% |
0.29046705 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1557 |
33.2% |
0.33205374 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
1135 |
24.2% |
0.24205588 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
386 |
8.2% |
0.08232032 |
| 97 |
No answer |
66 |
1.4% |
0.01407550 |
r7ktilfreds_4
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: How democracy works in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied
are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
490 |
10.4% |
0.10449989 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2473 |
52.7% |
0.52740456 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1182 |
25.2% |
0.25207933 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
391 |
8.3% |
0.08338665 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
90 |
1.9% |
0.01919386 |
| 97 |
No answer |
63 |
1.3% |
0.01343570 |
r7k10
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of the economic situation in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
569 |
12.1% |
0.121347835 |
| 2 |
Good |
2592 |
55.3% |
0.552783109 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
922 |
19.7% |
0.196630412 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
318 |
6.8% |
0.067818298 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
212 |
4.5% |
0.045212199 |
| 6 |
Bad |
48 |
1.0% |
0.010236724 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
12 |
0.3% |
0.002559181 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
0.3% |
0.003412241 |
r7k204
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party at parliamentary election tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
201 |
4.3% |
0.042866283 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
1097 |
23.4% |
0.233951802 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
418 |
8.9% |
0.089144807 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
232 |
4.9% |
0.049477501 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
263 |
5.6% |
0.056088718 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
261 |
5.6% |
0.055662188 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
177 |
3.8% |
0.037747921 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1519 |
32.4% |
0.323949669 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
126 |
2.7% |
0.026871401 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
152 |
3.2% |
0.032416293 |
| 11 |
Not entitled to vote |
83 |
1.8% |
0.017701002 |
| 12 |
Other: |
124 |
2.6% |
0.026444871 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
0.8% |
0.007677543 |
r7k204_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party at parliamentary election tomorrow, other
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7k6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Christian Democrats
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
492 |
10.5% |
0.104926424 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
769 |
16.4% |
0.164000853 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1156 |
24.7% |
0.246534442 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1059 |
22.6% |
0.225847729 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
857 |
18.3% |
0.182768181 |
| 6 |
Really like |
224 |
4.8% |
0.047771380 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
43 |
0.9% |
0.009170399 |
| 97 |
No answer |
89 |
1.9% |
0.018980593 |
r7k6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
197 |
4.2% |
0.04201322 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
522 |
11.1% |
0.11132438 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
972 |
20.7% |
0.20729367 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
611 |
13.0% |
0.13030497 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1143 |
24.4% |
0.24376200 |
| 6 |
Really like |
940 |
20.0% |
0.20046918 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
209 |
4.5% |
0.04457240 |
| 97 |
No answer |
95 |
2.0% |
0.02026018 |
r7k6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1222 |
26.1% |
0.26060994 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
925 |
19.7% |
0.19727021 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
721 |
15.4% |
0.15376413 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
460 |
9.8% |
0.09810194 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
712 |
15.2% |
0.15184474 |
| 6 |
Really like |
422 |
9.0% |
0.08999787 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
135 |
2.9% |
0.02879079 |
| 97 |
No answer |
92 |
2.0% |
0.01962039 |
r7k6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
439 |
9.4% |
0.09362337 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
643 |
13.7% |
0.13712945 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1011 |
21.6% |
0.21561100 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1087 |
23.2% |
0.23181915 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1034 |
22.1% |
0.22051610 |
| 6 |
Really like |
326 |
7.0% |
0.06952442 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
53 |
1.1% |
0.01130305 |
| 97 |
No answer |
96 |
2.0% |
0.02047345 |
r7k6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
708 |
15.1% |
0.15099168 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
844 |
18.0% |
0.17999573 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
814 |
17.4% |
0.17359778 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
882 |
18.8% |
0.18809981 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
850 |
18.1% |
0.18127533 |
| 6 |
Really like |
408 |
8.7% |
0.08701216 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
87 |
1.9% |
0.01855406 |
| 97 |
No answer |
96 |
2.0% |
0.02047345 |
r7k6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
264 |
5.6% |
0.05630198 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
559 |
11.9% |
0.11921518 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
964 |
20.6% |
0.20558755 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1497 |
31.9% |
0.31925784 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
959 |
20.5% |
0.20452122 |
| 6 |
Really like |
299 |
6.4% |
0.06376626 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
53 |
1.1% |
0.01130305 |
| 97 |
No answer |
94 |
2.0% |
0.02004692 |
r7k6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
995 |
21.2% |
0.21219876 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
729 |
15.5% |
0.15547025 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
814 |
17.4% |
0.17359778 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
805 |
17.2% |
0.17167840 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
874 |
18.6% |
0.18639369 |
| 6 |
Really like |
320 |
6.8% |
0.06824483 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
64 |
1.4% |
0.01364897 |
| 97 |
No answer |
88 |
1.9% |
0.01876733 |
r7k6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
142 |
3.0% |
0.03028364 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
339 |
7.2% |
0.07229687 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
716 |
15.3% |
0.15269780 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
640 |
13.6% |
0.13648966 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1357 |
28.9% |
0.28940073 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1167 |
24.9% |
0.24888036 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
247 |
5.3% |
0.05267648 |
| 97 |
No answer |
81 |
1.7% |
0.01727447 |
r7k6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1097 |
23.4% |
0.23395180 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
839 |
17.9% |
0.17892941 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
714 |
15.2% |
0.15227127 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1027 |
21.9% |
0.21902325 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
617 |
13.2% |
0.13158456 |
| 6 |
Really like |
233 |
5.0% |
0.04969077 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01215611 |
| 97 |
No answer |
105 |
2.2% |
0.02239283 |
r7k9_1
|
Variable label:
|
[1] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most
important issue.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7k9_2
|
Variable label:
|
[2] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most
important issue.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7k9_3
|
Variable label:
|
[3] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most
important issue.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7ocrecsm_mobil
|
Variable label:
|
R7OCRECSM_mobil
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1199] [Invalid:3490]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Does not use smartphone |
885 |
73.8% |
0.7381151 |
| 1 |
Uses smartphone |
314 |
26.2% |
0.2618849 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3490 |
|
NA |
r7ran20
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1199] [Invalid:3490]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
372 |
31.0% |
0.3102585 |
| 2 |
2 |
410 |
34.2% |
0.3419516 |
| 3 |
3 |
417 |
34.8% |
0.3477898 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3490 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm1a1_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran20=1 . ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
104 |
28.0% |
0.27956989 |
| 2 |
2 |
71 |
19.1% |
0.19086022 |
| 3 |
3 |
108 |
29.0% |
0.29032258 |
| 4 |
4 |
64 |
17.2% |
0.17204301 |
| 5 |
Completely |
20 |
5.4% |
0.05376344 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.3% |
0.01344086 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4317 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm1a2_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian background in deciding whether someone
could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran20=1 . ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
225 |
60.5% |
0.60483871 |
| 2 |
2 |
46 |
12.4% |
0.12365591 |
| 3 |
3 |
58 |
15.6% |
0.15591398 |
| 4 |
4 |
29 |
7.8% |
0.07795699 |
| 5 |
Completely |
10 |
2.7% |
0.02688172 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.1% |
0.01075269 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4317 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm1a3_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran20=1 . ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
75 |
20.2% |
0.201612903 |
| 2 |
2 |
77 |
20.7% |
0.206989247 |
| 3 |
3 |
97 |
26.1% |
0.260752688 |
| 4 |
4 |
96 |
25.8% |
0.258064516 |
| 5 |
Completely |
25 |
6.7% |
0.067204301 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005376344 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4317 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm1b1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM1B1_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1b1_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM1B1. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1b2
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian background in deciding whether someone
could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM1B2_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1b2_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian background in deciding whether someone
could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM1B2. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1b3
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM1B3_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1b3_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM1B3. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1c1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM1C1_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1c1_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM1C1. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1c2
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian background in deciding whether someone
could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM1C2_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1c2_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian background in deciding whether someone
could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM1C2. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1c3
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM1C3_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1c3_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM1C3. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2a1_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran20=1 . ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
123 |
33.1% |
0.33064516 |
| 2 |
2 |
76 |
20.4% |
0.20430108 |
| 3 |
3 |
114 |
30.6% |
0.30645161 |
| 4 |
4 |
33 |
8.9% |
0.08870968 |
| 5 |
Completely |
8 |
2.2% |
0.02150538 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
4.8% |
0.04838710 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4317 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm2a2_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran20=1 . ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
91 |
24.5% |
0.24462366 |
| 2 |
2 |
90 |
24.2% |
0.24193548 |
| 3 |
3 |
136 |
36.6% |
0.36559140 |
| 4 |
4 |
27 |
7.3% |
0.07258065 |
| 5 |
Completely |
7 |
1.9% |
0.01881720 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
5.6% |
0.05645161 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4317 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm2a3_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran20=1 . ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
152 |
40.9% |
0.40860215 |
| 2 |
2 |
81 |
21.8% |
0.21774194 |
| 3 |
3 |
85 |
22.8% |
0.22849462 |
| 4 |
4 |
33 |
8.9% |
0.08870968 |
| 5 |
Completely |
7 |
1.9% |
0.01881720 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
3.8% |
0.03763441 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4317 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm2b1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM2B1_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2b1_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM2B1. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2b2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM2B2_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2b2_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM2B2. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2b3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM2B3_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2b3_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM2B3. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2c1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM2C1_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-49]
|
r7ocrecsm2c1_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM2C1. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2c2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM2C2_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2c2_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM2C2. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2c3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM2C3_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2c3_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM2C3. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7mi1
|
Variable label:
|
Personal thoughts when your hear the word “Muslim” [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are your personal thoughts when you hear the word “Muslim”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write, using your own words, the first thing that comes into your
mind. We are interested in both long and short answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u!=2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u!=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3490] [Invalid:1199]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
1183 |
33.9% |
0.3389685 |
| 2 |
2 |
1163 |
33.3% |
0.3332378 |
| 3 |
3 |
1144 |
32.8% |
0.3277937 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1199 |
|
NA |
r7km1a
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the words “oil and gas” [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the words “oil and gas”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u!=2 and ran1=1. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7km1b
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the word “energy” [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the word “energy”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u!=2 and ran1=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7km1c
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the word “reorganisation” [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the word “reorganisation”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u!=2 and ran1=3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7dv30_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The tax burden should be reduced
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to cutbacks in the
welfare state.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
112 |
2.4% |
0.023885690 |
| 2 |
Agree |
296 |
6.3% |
0.063126466 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
606 |
12.9% |
0.129238644 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
497 |
10.6% |
0.105992749 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
877 |
18.7% |
0.187033483 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1266 |
27.0% |
0.269993602 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1007 |
21.5% |
0.214757944 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005971422 |
r7dv30_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Commercial private schools should be allowed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Commercial private schools should be allowed.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
299 |
6.4% |
0.063766261 |
| 2 |
Agree |
849 |
18.1% |
0.181062060 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
962 |
20.5% |
0.205161015 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
591 |
12.6% |
0.126039667 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
696 |
14.8% |
0.148432502 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
656 |
14.0% |
0.139901898 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
595 |
12.7% |
0.126892728 |
| 97 |
No answer |
41 |
0.9% |
0.008743869 |
r7dv30_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2118 |
45.2% |
0.451695457 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1284 |
27.4% |
0.273832374 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
421 |
9.0% |
0.089784602 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
299 |
6.4% |
0.063766261 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
213 |
4.5% |
0.045425464 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
176 |
3.8% |
0.037534656 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
148 |
3.2% |
0.031563233 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
0.6% |
0.006397953 |
r7dv30_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is better for a country if there is a diversity of
different religions and beliefs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different
religions and beliefs.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
581 |
12.4% |
0.123907016 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1082 |
23.1% |
0.230752826 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1001 |
21.3% |
0.213478354 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
666 |
14.2% |
0.142034549 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
569 |
12.1% |
0.121347835 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
444 |
9.5% |
0.094689699 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
317 |
6.8% |
0.067605033 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
0.6% |
0.006184688 |
r7ran40
|
Variable label:
|
[All respondents randomized. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1199] [Invalid:3490]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
287 |
23.9% |
0.2393661 |
| 2 |
2 |
333 |
27.8% |
0.2777314 |
| 3 |
3 |
287 |
23.9% |
0.2393661 |
| 4 |
4 |
292 |
24.4% |
0.2435363 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3490 |
|
NA |
r7dvh_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and
Vesterålen areas
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the area by Lofoten and
Vesterålen.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Respondents in sub-group u=2: asked if ran40!=4. U2 respondent are
asked R7DVH_1 or R7PILOTKM2. All other respondents are asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1056 |
24.1% |
0.241150948 |
| 2 |
Agree |
745 |
17.0% |
0.170130167 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
466 |
10.6% |
0.106416990 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
765 |
17.5% |
0.174697420 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
499 |
11.4% |
0.113952957 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
517 |
11.8% |
0.118063485 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
311 |
7.1% |
0.071020781 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
0.5% |
0.004567253 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
310 |
|
NA |
r7dvh_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as
Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians
have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
300 |
6.4% |
0.063979527 |
| 2 |
Agree |
765 |
16.3% |
0.163147793 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
822 |
17.5% |
0.175303903 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
472 |
10.1% |
0.100661122 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
950 |
20.3% |
0.202601834 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
810 |
17.3% |
0.172744722 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
539 |
11.5% |
0.114949883 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
0.7% |
0.006611218 |
r7dvh_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Many public activities could be done better and cheaper by
the private sector
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Many public activities could have been carried out both with better
results and at lower cost, if they were operated by the private sector.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
282 |
6.0% |
0.060140755 |
| 2 |
Agree |
715 |
15.2% |
0.152484538 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1148 |
24.5% |
0.244828322 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
608 |
13.0% |
0.129665174 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
683 |
14.6% |
0.145660055 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
779 |
16.6% |
0.166133504 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
437 |
9.3% |
0.093196844 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
0.8% |
0.007890808 |
r7dvh_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The state should help reduce income disparities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government should contribute to reducing income differences in
society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
855 |
18.2% |
0.182341651 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1380 |
29.4% |
0.294305822 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1168 |
24.9% |
0.249093623 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
493 |
10.5% |
0.105139689 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
429 |
9.1% |
0.091490723 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
249 |
5.3% |
0.053103007 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
80 |
1.7% |
0.017061207 |
| 97 |
No answer |
35 |
0.7% |
0.007464278 |
r7ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[All respondents randomized. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4681] [Invalid:8] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
2294 |
49.0% |
0.4900662 |
| 2 |
2 |
2387 |
51.0% |
0.5099338 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8 |
|
NA |
r7km13_1
|
Variable label:
|
Should put a greater stake into reducing emission in Norway, abroad or
both
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate researchers are of the opinion that emission of greenhouse gases
must be greatly reduced in order to counteract climate change caused by
human activities.
A debate is taking place to establish whether Norway should put a stake
into such reductions in Norway or abroad. Reducing emissions abroad is
often cheaper than in Norway, but measures abroad have also been
criticised because the desired effect has not been achieved.
What do you think?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should the authorities put a greater stake into reducing emissions in
Norway or abroad, or the same amount for both?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran2=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The authorities should concentrate most on reducing emissions in Norway |
521 |
22.7% |
0.22711421 |
| 2 |
The authorities should concentrate most on reducing emissions abroad |
308 |
13.4% |
0.13426330 |
| 3 |
The authorities should concentrate on reducing emissions equally in Norway and
abroad |
1413 |
61.6% |
0.61595466 |
| 97 |
No answer |
52 |
2.3% |
0.02266783 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2395 |
|
NA |
r7km13_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most of the reductions in emissions Norway has committed to
should be carried out abroad
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree or
disagree with that?
|
|
Literal question:
|
“Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has
committed to should be carried out abroad”
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran2=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
120 |
5.0% |
0.050272308 |
| 2 |
Agree |
167 |
7.0% |
0.069962296 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
336 |
14.1% |
0.140762463 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
558 |
23.4% |
0.233766234 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
375 |
15.7% |
0.157100964 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
557 |
23.3% |
0.233347298 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
254 |
10.6% |
0.106409719 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
0.8% |
0.008378718 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2302 |
|
NA |
r7elite_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: We agree on which actions that needs to be completed, but
little is happening because of the authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
We are in agreement regarding most of the actions that need to be
completed in this country, but very little is happening because the
authorities are standing in the way.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
151 |
3.2% |
0.03220303 |
| 2 |
Agree |
431 |
9.2% |
0.09191725 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1200 |
25.6% |
0.25591811 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1035 |
22.1% |
0.22072937 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
713 |
15.2% |
0.15205801 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
938 |
20.0% |
0.20004265 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
150 |
3.2% |
0.03198976 |
| 97 |
No answer |
71 |
1.5% |
0.01514182 |
r7elite_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politicians maintain close contact with the electorate in the
whole of the country
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Most of the professional politicians in Norway maintain close contact
with the electorate in the whole of the country.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
12 |
0.3% |
0.002559181 |
| 2 |
Agree |
269 |
5.7% |
0.057368309 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
808 |
17.2% |
0.172318192 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1033 |
22.0% |
0.220302836 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1193 |
25.4% |
0.254425251 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
991 |
21.1% |
0.211345703 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
319 |
6.8% |
0.068031563 |
| 97 |
No answer |
64 |
1.4% |
0.013648966 |
r7elite_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Many important decisions made by small group without ordinary
people’s knowledge
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
In this country, many important decisions are made by a small group of
people without the ordinary people being told.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
471 |
10.0% |
0.10044786 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1158 |
24.7% |
0.24696097 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1528 |
32.6% |
0.32586906 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
642 |
13.7% |
0.13691619 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
459 |
9.8% |
0.09788868 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
326 |
7.0% |
0.06952442 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
47 |
1.0% |
0.01002346 |
| 97 |
No answer |
58 |
1.2% |
0.01236938 |
r7elite_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Difference between politicians same as between ordinary
people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The differences amongst politicians are the same as between ordinary
people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
468 |
10.0% |
0.09980806 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1778 |
37.9% |
0.37918533 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1042 |
22.2% |
0.22222222 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
589 |
12.6% |
0.12561314 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
446 |
9.5% |
0.09511623 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
247 |
5.3% |
0.05267648 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01215611 |
| 97 |
No answer |
62 |
1.3% |
0.01322244 |
r7ran5
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1195] [Invalid:3494]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
609 |
51.0% |
0.5096234 |
| 2 |
2 |
586 |
49.0% |
0.4903766 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3494 |
|
NA |
r7mi4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Do leaders care mostly for themselves, or do they try to do what they
feel is right?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some are of the opinion that leaders normally care mostly for
themselves. Others are of the opinion that they try their best to do
what they feel is right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran5=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Leaders care greatly for themselves |
28 |
4.6% |
0.04597701 |
| 2 |
Leaders care mostly for themselves |
111 |
18.2% |
0.18226601 |
| 3 |
Leaders care somewhat for themselves |
118 |
19.4% |
0.19376026 |
| 4 |
Neither of these |
69 |
11.3% |
0.11330049 |
| 5 |
Leaders try somewhat to do what is right |
133 |
21.8% |
0.21839080 |
| 6 |
Leaders try mostly to do what is right |
133 |
21.8% |
0.21839080 |
| 7 |
Leaders try greatly to do what is right |
10 |
1.6% |
0.01642036 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4080 |
|
NA |
r7mi4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Do Muslim leaders care mostly for themselves, or do they try to do what
they feel is right?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some are of the opinion that Muslim leaders normally care mostly for
themselves. Others are of the opinion that they try their best to do
what they feel is right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran5=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Muslim leaders care greatly for themselves |
68 |
11.6% |
0.116040956 |
| 2 |
Muslim leaders care mostly for themselves |
109 |
18.6% |
0.186006826 |
| 3 |
Muslim leaders care somewhat for themselves |
56 |
9.6% |
0.095563140 |
| 4 |
Neither of these |
158 |
27.0% |
0.269624573 |
| 5 |
Muslim leaders try somewhat to do what is right |
110 |
18.8% |
0.187713311 |
| 6 |
Muslim leaders try mostly to do what is right |
46 |
7.8% |
0.078498294 |
| 7 |
Muslim leaders try greatly to do what is right |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006825939 |
| 97 |
No answer |
35 |
6.0% |
0.059726962 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4103 |
|
NA |
r7pad10_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Immigrant children of parents that are illegal residents
should be able to remain if parents deported
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, to what extent do you disagree or agree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant children of parents that are illegal residents in Norway
should have the right to remain in the country if the parents are
deported.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
48 |
4.4% |
0.04351768 |
| 2 |
Agree |
150 |
13.6% |
0.13599275 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
222 |
20.1% |
0.20126927 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
186 |
16.9% |
0.16863101 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
169 |
15.3% |
0.15321850 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
214 |
19.4% |
0.19401632 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
94 |
8.5% |
0.08522212 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.8% |
0.01813237 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7pad10_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: If an employer supplies you with a phone, the employer should
have the right to read text-messages/e-mails on the phone
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, to what extent do you disagree or agree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If an employer supplies you with a mobile phone for use in connection
with your employment, the employer should have the right to read all the
text messages or e-mails you send and receive with this phone.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
35 |
3.2% |
0.03173164 |
| 2 |
Agree |
108 |
9.8% |
0.09791478 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
85 |
7.7% |
0.07706256 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
72 |
6.5% |
0.06527652 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
96 |
8.7% |
0.08703536 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
301 |
27.3% |
0.27289211 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
388 |
35.2% |
0.35176791 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
1.6% |
0.01631913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7pad10_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Not possible to bring neighbour disputes to court before
mediation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, to what extent do you disagree or agree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It should not be possible to bring neighbour disputes (like the height
of trees and fences) to court, without first having tried to resolve the
conflict by mediation.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
422 |
38.3% |
0.38259293 |
| 2 |
Agree |
483 |
43.8% |
0.43789665 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
79 |
7.2% |
0.07162285 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
3.9% |
0.03898459 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
14 |
1.3% |
0.01269266 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
24 |
2.2% |
0.02175884 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
1.5% |
0.01450589 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
2.0% |
0.01994560 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7k15_1
|
Variable label:
|
Can most people be trusted?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Post-question:
|
State your opinion on the scale below. This goes from 0 to 10, where 0
means “Cannot be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be
trusted”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
68 |
1.5% |
0.01450203 |
| 2 |
1 |
50 |
1.1% |
0.01066325 |
| 3 |
2 |
116 |
2.5% |
0.02473875 |
| 4 |
3 |
242 |
5.2% |
0.05161015 |
| 5 |
4 |
239 |
5.1% |
0.05097036 |
| 6 |
5 |
537 |
11.5% |
0.11452335 |
| 7 |
6 |
506 |
10.8% |
0.10791213 |
| 8 |
7 |
1104 |
23.5% |
0.23544466 |
| 9 |
8 |
973 |
20.8% |
0.20750693 |
| 10 |
9 |
415 |
8.9% |
0.08850501 |
| 11 |
10- Most people can be trusted |
382 |
8.1% |
0.08146726 |
| 97 |
No answer |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01215611 |
r7pad14_version
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly selects a version of the conjunction-experiment. Background
variable conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects the number and combination of news and entertainment
articles.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
4 news articles |
1576 |
33.8% |
0.3382700 |
| 2 |
6 news articles |
1556 |
33.4% |
0.3339772 |
| 3 |
4 entertainment articles and 2 news articles |
1527 |
32.8% |
0.3277527 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_selections
|
Variable label:
|
The number of articles the respondent can select. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects, between 1 and 3, how many news articles the
respondent may choose. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 selection |
1565 |
33.6% |
0.3359090 |
| 2 |
2 selections |
1497 |
32.1% |
0.3213136 |
| 3 |
3 selections |
1597 |
34.3% |
0.3427774 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_likes01
|
Variable label:
|
Dichotomy whether the articles should be listed with endorsements, or
not. Background variable conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly decides whether the articles should be listed with
endorsements, or not. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
No |
2374 |
51.0% |
0.5095514 |
| 1 |
Yes |
2285 |
49.0% |
0.4904486 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_sourcesRan_1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 1. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source for article 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
682 |
14.6% |
0.1463833 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
683 |
14.7% |
0.1465980 |
| 3 |
VG |
655 |
14.1% |
0.1405881 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
675 |
14.5% |
0.1448809 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
660 |
14.2% |
0.1416613 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
668 |
14.3% |
0.1433784 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
636 |
13.7% |
0.1365100 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_sourcesRan_2
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 2. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source for article 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
702 |
15.1% |
0.1506761 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
643 |
13.8% |
0.1380124 |
| 3 |
VG |
680 |
14.6% |
0.1459541 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
688 |
14.8% |
0.1476712 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
620 |
13.3% |
0.1330758 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
670 |
14.4% |
0.1438077 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
656 |
14.1% |
0.1408027 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_sourcesRan_3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 3. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source for article 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
653 |
14.0% |
0.1401588 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
663 |
14.2% |
0.1423052 |
| 3 |
VG |
670 |
14.4% |
0.1438077 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
656 |
14.1% |
0.1408027 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
673 |
14.4% |
0.1444516 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
655 |
14.1% |
0.1405881 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
689 |
14.8% |
0.1478858 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_sourcesRan_4
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 4. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source for article 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
666 |
14.3% |
0.1429491 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
647 |
13.9% |
0.1388710 |
| 3 |
VG |
678 |
14.6% |
0.1455248 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
680 |
14.6% |
0.1459541 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
651 |
14.0% |
0.1397296 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
658 |
14.1% |
0.1412320 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
679 |
14.6% |
0.1457394 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_sourcesRan_5
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 5. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source for article 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3083] [Invalid:1606]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
478 |
15.5% |
0.1550438 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
427 |
13.9% |
0.1385015 |
| 3 |
VG |
432 |
14.0% |
0.1401233 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
417 |
13.5% |
0.1352579 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
443 |
14.4% |
0.1436912 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
433 |
14.0% |
0.1404476 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
453 |
14.7% |
0.1469348 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1606 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_sourcesRan_6
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 6. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source for article 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3083] [Invalid:1606]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
444 |
14.4% |
0.1440156 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
424 |
13.8% |
0.1375284 |
| 3 |
VG |
447 |
14.5% |
0.1449886 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
474 |
15.4% |
0.1537464 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
441 |
14.3% |
0.1430425 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
441 |
14.3% |
0.1430425 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
412 |
13.4% |
0.1336361 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1606 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_likesRan_1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen endorsement for article 1. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If endorsements are to be listed: endorsement for article 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2285] [Invalid:2404]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 people recommend |
754 |
33.0% |
0.3299781 |
| 2 |
95 people recommend |
248 |
10.9% |
0.1085339 |
| 3 |
98 people recommend |
239 |
10.5% |
0.1045952 |
| 4 |
106 people recommend |
269 |
11.8% |
0.1177243 |
| 5 |
1054 people recommend |
261 |
11.4% |
0.1142232 |
| 6 |
1133 people recommend |
278 |
12.2% |
0.1216630 |
| 7 |
1211 people recommend |
236 |
10.3% |
0.1032823 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2404 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_likesRan_2
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen endorsement for article 2. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If endorsements are to be listed: endorsement for article 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2285] [Invalid:2404]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 people recommend |
751 |
32.9% |
0.3286652 |
| 2 |
95 people recommend |
244 |
10.7% |
0.1067834 |
| 3 |
98 people recommend |
275 |
12.0% |
0.1203501 |
| 4 |
106 people recommend |
245 |
10.7% |
0.1072210 |
| 5 |
1054 people recommend |
256 |
11.2% |
0.1120350 |
| 6 |
1133 people recommend |
235 |
10.3% |
0.1028446 |
| 7 |
1211 people recommend |
279 |
12.2% |
0.1221007 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2404 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_likesRan_3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen endorsement for article 3. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If endorsements are to be listed: endorsement for article 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2285] [Invalid:2404]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 people recommend |
768 |
33.6% |
0.3361050 |
| 2 |
95 people recommend |
274 |
12.0% |
0.1199125 |
| 3 |
98 people recommend |
234 |
10.2% |
0.1024070 |
| 4 |
106 people recommend |
237 |
10.4% |
0.1037199 |
| 5 |
1054 people recommend |
258 |
11.3% |
0.1129103 |
| 6 |
1133 |
