Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Sveinung Arnesen, Endre Tvinnereim, Kristine Bærøe, Ivar Eimhjellen,
Erla Løvseth, Marta Eidheim.
|
Scientific team, University of Bergen and UNI Research Rokkan Centre
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in three
waves, wave 1, wave 3 and wave 8. In wave 1, 4.870 panel members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623 members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4.245 new members
were recruited (see documentation from wave 8).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure
of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000
individuals.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a online questionnaire with postal recruitment.
For a more detailed description, please see the documentation report
from wave 8. The report is available here:
http://digsscore.uib.no/download-data-and-documentation
The invitation was emailed on the 11th of May 2017.
Three reminders were sent at the following dates: 15th of May, 18th of
May, and 22th of May. The reminder was sent to those who a) had not
entered the questionnaire, and b) had not completed the questionnaire.
Panel members with registered phone number received the last of these
reminders as a text message. Panel members without registered phone
number received the reminder as an email.
Wave 9 was closed 06th of June.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix). When
calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s
geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These
attributes were included in the sample file we received from the
Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of
education is provided by the respondents when answering the
questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer
this question. Because of this, two different weights have been
calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 9
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r9Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r9Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r9Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2020-07-01
|
r9k26
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 9
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-11
|
r9k24_1_1
|
Data
redacted due to privacy concerns (263 non-missing obs).
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r9tilfreds3
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r9tilfreds4
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-19
|
r9k33_9_other_kodet
|
New variable based on r9k33_9_other.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-18
|
r9k21_6_other_kodet
|
New variable based on r9k21_6_other.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-17
|
r9k27_9_other_kodet
|
New variable based on r9k27_9_other.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-08
|
r9helse1a
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-08
|
r9helse1b
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r9p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r9p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-21
|
r9p3
|
Updated the value of 1 respondent.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-15
|
r9_weight_2
|
Corrected values of 2 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-14
|
r9p4_1
|
Corrected values of 2 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-14
|
r9p4_2
|
Corrected values of 2 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-01-17
|
r9helse3_1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2018-01-17
|
r9helse3_2
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2017-10-18
|
r9tvdeb2
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
v-100
|
2017-08-28
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 9
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-24
|
r9medtrust1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-21
|
eips2017i
|
Changed group description. [The Progress party/ The Liberal party/
Christian church / Muslim community / An anti-Islamic group / A neo-Nazi
group /A Muslim fundamentalist group]
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 9 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
6897
|
|
# Variables
|
243
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentn completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
1954 |
28.3% |
0.2833116 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
2237 |
32.4% |
0.3243439 |
| 8 |
Wave 8 |
2706 |
39.2% |
0.3923445 |
browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
4708 |
68.3% |
0.6826156 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
2189 |
31.7% |
0.3173844 |
opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
4817 |
69.8% |
0.698419603 |
| 2 |
Touch |
2061 |
29.9% |
0.298825576 |
| 3 |
Generic |
19 |
0.3% |
0.002754821 |
advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
x_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert!=8.Divides respondents recruited prior to wave
8 into two thematically separate groups. Besides the core questions, the
respondents only answer questions connected to their assigned group. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert!=8.Divides respondents recruited prior to wave
8 into two thematically separate groups. Besides the core questions, the
respondents only answer questions connected to their assigned group. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4191] [Invalid:2706]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Part 2 - Respondents recruited in wave 1/3 |
2099 |
50.1% |
0.5008351 |
| 2 |
Part 3 - Respondents recruited in wave 1/3 |
2092 |
49.9% |
0.4991649 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2706 |
|
NA |
r9k1
|
Variable label:
|
Interest in politics
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
846 |
12.3% |
0.12266203 |
| 2 |
Interested |
3259 |
47.3% |
0.47252429 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
2125 |
30.8% |
0.30810497 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
567 |
8.2% |
0.08220966 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
83 |
1.2% |
0.01203422 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
0.2% |
0.00246484 |
r9k8_1
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on scale, political standing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right
wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are politically on
the far left, and 10 represents those who are politically on the far
right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left |
124 |
1.8% |
0.01797883 |
| 2 |
1 |
301 |
4.4% |
0.04364216 |
| 3 |
2 |
514 |
7.5% |
0.07452516 |
| 4 |
3 |
1033 |
15.0% |
0.14977526 |
| 5 |
4 |
923 |
13.4% |
0.13382630 |
| 6 |
5 |
1105 |
16.0% |
0.16021459 |
| 7 |
6 |
756 |
11.0% |
0.10961288 |
| 8 |
7 |
920 |
13.3% |
0.13339133 |
| 9 |
8 |
679 |
9.8% |
0.09844860 |
| 10 |
9 |
218 |
3.2% |
0.03160795 |
| 11 |
10 Right |
141 |
2.0% |
0.02044367 |
| 97 |
No answer |
183 |
2.7% |
0.02653328 |
r9tilfreds3
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: The government in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
267 |
3.9% |
0.03871248 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2047 |
29.7% |
0.29679571 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2228 |
32.3% |
0.32303900 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
1623 |
23.5% |
0.23531970 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
485 |
7.0% |
0.07032043 |
| 97 |
No answer |
247 |
3.6% |
0.03581267 |
r9tilfreds4
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: How democracy works in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
990 |
14.4% |
0.14354067 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
3442 |
49.9% |
0.49905756 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1326 |
19.2% |
0.19225750 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
424 |
6.1% |
0.06147600 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
85 |
1.2% |
0.01232420 |
| 97 |
No answer |
630 |
9.1% |
0.09134406 |
r9k204
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party at parliamentary election tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
308 |
4.5% |
0.04465710 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1576 |
22.9% |
0.22850515 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
612 |
8.9% |
0.08873423 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
264 |
3.8% |
0.03827751 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
366 |
5.3% |
0.05306655 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
733 |
10.6% |
0.10627809 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
299 |
4.3% |
0.04335218 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1914 |
27.8% |
0.27751196 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
206 |
3.0% |
0.02986806 |
| 10 |
Other: |
177 |
2.6% |
0.02566333 |
| 11 |
Would not vote |
223 |
3.2% |
0.03233290 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
167 |
2.4% |
0.02421343 |
| 97 |
No answer |
52 |
0.8% |
0.00753951 |
r9k204_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party at parliamentary election tomorrow, other
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r9k9_1
|
Variable label:
|
[1] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r9k9_2
|
Variable label:
|
[2] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r9k9_3
|
Variable label:
|
[3] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r9k6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Christian Democrats
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
686 |
9.9% |
0.09946353 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1087 |
15.8% |
0.15760476 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1712 |
24.8% |
0.24822387 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1563 |
22.7% |
0.22662027 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1235 |
17.9% |
0.17906336 |
| 6 |
Really like |
377 |
5.5% |
0.05466145 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
81 |
1.2% |
0.01174424 |
| 97 |
No answer |
156 |
2.3% |
0.02261853 |
r9k6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
244 |
3.5% |
0.03537770 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
839 |
12.2% |
0.12164709 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1340 |
19.4% |
0.19428737 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
874 |
12.7% |
0.12672176 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1613 |
23.4% |
0.23386980 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1502 |
21.8% |
0.21777584 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
333 |
4.8% |
0.04828186 |
| 97 |
No answer |
152 |
2.2% |
0.02203857 |
r9k6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1841 |
26.7% |
0.26692765 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1378 |
20.0% |
0.19979701 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
972 |
14.1% |
0.14093084 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
639 |
9.3% |
0.09264898 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1055 |
15.3% |
0.15296506 |
| 6 |
Really like |
650 |
9.4% |
0.09424387 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
207 |
3.0% |
0.03001305 |
| 97 |
No answer |
155 |
2.2% |
0.02247354 |
r9k6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
766 |
11.1% |
0.111062781 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1044 |
15.1% |
0.151370161 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1492 |
21.6% |
0.216325939 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1597 |
23.2% |
0.231549949 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1379 |
20.0% |
0.199942004 |
| 6 |
Really like |
391 |
5.7% |
0.056691315 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
59 |
0.9% |
0.008554444 |
| 97 |
No answer |
169 |
2.5% |
0.024503407 |
r9k6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1057 |
15.3% |
0.15325504 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1187 |
17.2% |
0.17210381 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1285 |
18.6% |
0.18631289 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1278 |
18.5% |
0.18529796 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1198 |
17.4% |
0.17369871 |
| 6 |
Really like |
592 |
8.6% |
0.08583442 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
135 |
2.0% |
0.01957373 |
| 97 |
No answer |
165 |
2.4% |
0.02392344 |
r9k6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
389 |
5.6% |
0.05640133 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
717 |
10.4% |
0.10395824 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1281 |
18.6% |
0.18573293 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1773 |
25.7% |
0.25706829 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1638 |
23.7% |
0.23749456 |
| 6 |
Really like |
768 |
11.1% |
0.11135276 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
168 |
2.4% |
0.02435842 |
| 97 |
No answer |
163 |
2.4% |
0.02363346 |
r9k6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1414 |
20.5% |
0.20501667 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1111 |
16.1% |
0.16108453 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1136 |
16.5% |
0.16470929 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1177 |
17.1% |
0.17065391 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1247 |
18.1% |
0.18080325 |
| 6 |
Really like |
538 |
7.8% |
0.07800493 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
115 |
1.7% |
0.01667392 |
| 97 |
No answer |
159 |
2.3% |
0.02305350 |
r9k6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
306 |
4.4% |
0.04436712 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
548 |
7.9% |
0.07945484 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1101 |
16.0% |
0.15963462 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
952 |
13.8% |
0.13803103 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1970 |
28.6% |
0.28563143 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1581 |
22.9% |
0.22923010 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
294 |
4.3% |
0.04262723 |
| 97 |
No answer |
145 |
2.1% |
0.02102363 |
r9k6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1592 |
23.1% |
0.23082500 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1228 |
17.8% |
0.17804843 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1067 |
15.5% |
0.15470494 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1456 |
21.1% |
0.21110628 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
887 |
12.9% |
0.12860664 |
| 6 |
Really like |
376 |
5.5% |
0.05451646 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
110 |
1.6% |
0.01594896 |
| 97 |
No answer |
181 |
2.6% |
0.02624329 |
r9k10
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of the economic situation in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
1220 |
17.7% |
0.176888502 |
| 2 |
Good |
3773 |
54.7% |
0.547049442 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
1143 |
16.6% |
0.165724228 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
301 |
4.4% |
0.043642163 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
240 |
3.5% |
0.034797738 |
| 6 |
Bad |
49 |
0.7% |
0.007104538 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
16 |
0.2% |
0.002319849 |
| 97 |
No answer |
155 |
2.2% |
0.022473539 |
r9sentral
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for
rural Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
975 |
14.1% |
0.14136581 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1649 |
23.9% |
0.23908946 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1732 |
25.1% |
0.25112368 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
961 |
13.9% |
0.13933594 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
496 |
7.2% |
0.07191533 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
418 |
6.1% |
0.06060606 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
133 |
1.9% |
0.01928375 |
| 97 |
No answer |
533 |
7.7% |
0.07727998 |
r9k29
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1591 |
23.1% |
0.23068001 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1480 |
21.5% |
0.21458605 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1284 |
18.6% |
0.18616790 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
739 |
10.7% |
0.10714804 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
563 |
8.2% |
0.08162969 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
699 |
10.1% |
0.10134841 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
313 |
4.5% |
0.04538205 |
| 97 |
No answer |
228 |
3.3% |
0.03305785 |
r9komref
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose municipal reform
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As you are perhaps aware, the Government has suggested consolidating a
number of municipalities in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you support or oppose this municipal reform?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if x_ran!=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support a lot |
559 |
11.7% |
0.11743697 |
| 2 |
Support |
932 |
19.6% |
0.19579832 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
1103 |
23.2% |
0.23172269 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
717 |
15.1% |
0.15063025 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
657 |
13.8% |
0.13802521 |
| 6 |
Oppose |
429 |
9.0% |
0.09012605 |
| 7 |
Strongly oppose |
310 |
6.5% |
0.06512605 |
| 97 |
No answer |
53 |
1.1% |
0.01113445 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2137 |
|
NA |
r9intpol
|
Variable label:
|
Interest in news pertaining to politics
|
|
Literal question:
|
How interested are you in news pertaining to politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
1159 |
16.8% |
0.168044077 |
| 2 |
Interested |
3428 |
49.7% |
0.497027693 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
1783 |
25.9% |
0.258518196 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
430 |
6.2% |
0.062345948 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
71 |
1.0% |
0.010294331 |
| 97 |
No answer |
26 |
0.4% |
0.003769755 |
r9intliv
|
Variable label:
|
Interest in news pertaining to sports/lifestyle/entertainment
|
|
Literal question:
|
How interested are you in news pertaining to
sports/lifestyle/entertainment?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
545 |
7.9% |
0.07901986 |
| 2 |
Interested |
2507 |
36.3% |
0.36349137 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
2142 |
31.1% |
0.31056981 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
1123 |
16.3% |
0.16282442 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
243 |
3.5% |
0.03523271 |
| 97 |
No answer |
337 |
4.9% |
0.04886182 |
r9knyhetred
|
Variable label:
|
How important are the established media as source of news
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important are the established media (such as TV, newspapers, radio
and Internet newspapers) for you as sources of news?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
3128 |
45.4% |
0.453530521 |
| 2 |
Important |
2932 |
42.5% |
0.425112368 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
577 |
8.4% |
0.083659562 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
148 |
2.1% |
0.021458605 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
37 |
0.5% |
0.005364651 |
| 97 |
No answer |
75 |
1.1% |
0.010874293 |
r9knyhetliv
|
Variable label:
|
How important are social media as source of news
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important are social media (such as Facebook, Twitter and Snapchat)
for you as sources of news?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
361 |
5.2% |
0.05234160 |
| 2 |
Important |
1035 |
15.0% |
0.15006525 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
1584 |
23.0% |
0.22966507 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
2097 |
30.4% |
0.30404524 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
1606 |
23.3% |
0.23285486 |
| 97 |
No answer |
214 |
3.1% |
0.03102798 |
eips2017a_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert=8. Selects random political unit [Norway / EU]
for question eips2017a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert=8. Selects random political unit [Norway / EU]
for question eips2017a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2706] [Invalid:4191]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway |
1347 |
49.8% |
0.4977827 |
| 2 |
EU |
1359 |
50.2% |
0.5022173 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4191 |
|
NA |
eips2017a
|
Variable label:
|
How democratic do you think [Norway/EU] is overall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How democratic do you think [Norway/EU] is overall?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please choose your answer below where 0 is not at all democratic and 10
is completely democratic.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - Not democratic at all |
71 |
2.6% |
0.02623799 |
| 2 |
1 |
71 |
2.6% |
0.02623799 |
| 3 |
2 |
148 |
5.5% |
0.05469327 |
| 4 |
3 |
211 |
7.8% |
0.07797487 |
| 5 |
4 |
192 |
7.1% |
0.07095344 |
| 6 |
5 |
378 |
14.0% |
0.13968958 |
| 7 |
6 |
265 |
9.8% |
0.09793052 |
| 8 |
7 |
442 |
16.3% |
0.16334072 |
| 9 |
8 |
479 |
17.7% |
0.17701404 |
| 10 |
9 |
298 |
11.0% |
0.11012565 |
| 11 |
10 - Completely democratic |
115 |
4.2% |
0.04249815 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
1.3% |
0.01330377 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4191 |
|
NA |
eips2017b
|
Variable label:
|
Justification to how democratic you think [Norway/EU] is overall [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How democratic do you think [Norway/EU] is overall? Please choose your
alternative below where 0 is not at all democratic and 10 is completely
democratic. Your answer: [print out of eips2017a, 0-10]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Could you justify your answer to the previous question?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Your response will be studied carefully, so please take the time to fill
in your views:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and eips2017a is answered.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
eips2017c_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert=8. Selects random geographic distance [blank /
for you personally / for Norway / for Europe / for the world] for the
question eips2017c_1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert=8. Selects random geographic distance [blank /
for you personally / for Norway / for Europe / for the world] for the
question eips2017a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2688] [Invalid:4209]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
534 |
19.9% |
0.1986607 |
| 2 |
for you personally |
547 |
20.3% |
0.2034970 |
| 3 |
for Norway |
544 |
20.2% |
0.2023810 |
| 4 |
for Europe |
530 |
19.7% |
0.1971726 |
| 5 |
for the world |
533 |
19.8% |
0.1982887 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4209 |
|
NA |
eips2017c_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you see climate change as a threat [blank / for you
personally / for Norway / for Europe / for the world]?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you see climate change as a threat [blank / for you
personally / for Norway / for Europe / for the world]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 No threat at all |
103 |
3.8% |
0.03806356 |
| 2 |
1 |
61 |
2.3% |
0.02254250 |
| 3 |
2 |
139 |
5.1% |
0.05136733 |
| 4 |
3 |
191 |
7.1% |
0.07058389 |
| 5 |
4 |
180 |
6.7% |
0.06651885 |
| 6 |
5 |
343 |
12.7% |
0.12675536 |
| 7 |
6 |
353 |
13.0% |
0.13045085 |
| 8 |
7 |
532 |
19.7% |
0.19660015 |
| 9 |
8 |
412 |
15.2% |
0.15225425 |
| 10 |
9 |
191 |
7.1% |
0.07058389 |
| 11 |
10 Extreme threat |
169 |
6.2% |
0.06245381 |
| 97 |
No answer |
32 |
1.2% |
0.01182557 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4191 |
|
NA |
eips2017d
|
Variable label:
|
Do you oppose/support Norwegian membership in the EU?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Now thinking about the European Union, how much do you oppose or support
Norwegian membership in the EU?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please choose your answer below where 0 is completely oppose and 10 is
completely support.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 I completely oppose Norwegian EU membership |
747 |
27.6% |
0.27605322 |
| 2 |
1 |
189 |
7.0% |
0.06984479 |
| 3 |
2 |
282 |
10.4% |
0.10421286 |
| 4 |
3 |
272 |
10.1% |
0.10051737 |
| 5 |
4 |
168 |
6.2% |
0.06208426 |
| 6 |
5 |
363 |
13.4% |
0.13414634 |
| 7 |
6 |
141 |
5.2% |
0.05210643 |
| 8 |
7 |
146 |
5.4% |
0.05395418 |
| 9 |
8 |
163 |
6.0% |
0.06023651 |
| 10 |
9 |
54 |
2.0% |
0.01995565 |
| 11 |
10 I completely support Norwegian EU membership |
135 |
5.0% |
0.04988914 |
| 97 |
Ikke svart |
46 |
1.7% |
0.01699926 |
| 98 |
Ikke spurt |
4191 |
|
NA |
eips2017e_turnout
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses election turnout. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses election turnout. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2682] [Invalid:4215]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Blank] |
532 |
19.8% |
0.1983594 |
| 2 |
35% of the citizens participated |
532 |
19.8% |
0.1983594 |
| 3 |
47% of the citizens participated |
570 |
21.3% |
0.2125280 |
| 4 |
53% of the citizens participated |
567 |
21.1% |
0.2114094 |
| 5 |
85% of the citizens participated |
481 |
17.9% |
0.1793438 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4215 |
|
NA |
eips2017e_majoritysize
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses majority size. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses majority size. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2682] [Invalid:4215]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Blank] |
658 |
24.5% |
0.2453393 |
| 2 |
The winning side received 51% of the votes |
656 |
24.5% |
0.2445936 |
| 3 |
The winning side received 55% of the votes |
707 |
26.4% |
0.2636092 |
| 4 |
The winning side received 70% of the votes |
661 |
24.6% |
0.2464579 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4215 |
|
NA |
eips2017e_winner
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses winner. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses winner. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2682] [Invalid:4215]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Blank] |
881 |
32.8% |
0.3284862 |
| 2 |
The pro-EU side won the majority |
918 |
34.2% |
0.3422819 |
| 3 |
The anti-EU side won the majority |
883 |
32.9% |
0.3292319 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4215 |
|
NA |
eips2017e_dv
|
Variable label:
|
Should the government follow outcome of referendum even though the
majority of the national parliament disagreed?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in how people see the role of referendums in
political decisions. Imagine a debate surfaced concerning the membership
of Norway in the EU, and that an advisory referendum was held on the
issue.
[Printout of the value of eips2017e_turnout, eips2017e_majoritysize,
eips2017e_winner]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is right in such a situation, should the government follow the
outcome of the referendum even though the majority of the national
parliament disagreed with the referendum outcome?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Conjoint experiment. Respondent is exposed to an
vignette which vary along three dimensions (see background variables). ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
No, the government should not follow the outcome of the referendum |
627 |
23.2% |
0.23170732 |
| 1 |
Yes, the government should follow the outcome of the referendum |
1968 |
72.7% |
0.72727273 |
| 97 |
No answer |
111 |
4.1% |
0.04101996 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4191 |
|
NA |
eips2017f_entity
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Selects random political unit [Norway / EU] for
question eips2017f_dv.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Selects random political unit [Norway / EU] for
question eips2017f_dv.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2676] [Invalid:4221]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway |
1329 |
49.7% |
0.4966368 |
| 2 |
EU |
1347 |
50.3% |
0.5033632 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4221 |
|
NA |
eips2017f_dv
|
Variable label:
|
How much does the political system in [Norway / EU] allow people like
you to have an influence on politics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say that the political system in [Norway / EU] allows
people like you to have an influence on politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Not at all |
450 |
16.6% |
0.166297118 |
| 2 |
1 |
221 |
8.2% |
0.081670362 |
| 3 |
2 |
294 |
10.9% |
0.108647450 |
| 4 |
3 |
373 |
13.8% |
0.137841833 |
| 5 |
4 |
260 |
9.6% |
0.096082779 |
| 6 |
5 |
404 |
14.9% |
0.149297857 |
| 7 |
6 |
239 |
8.8% |
0.088322247 |
| 8 |
7 |
245 |
9.1% |
0.090539542 |
| 9 |
8 |
102 |
3.8% |
0.037694013 |
| 10 |
9 |
28 |
1.0% |
0.010347376 |
| 11 |
10 Completely |
25 |
0.9% |
0.009238729 |
| 97 |
No answer |
65 |
2.4% |
0.024020695 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4191 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert=8. Conjoint Experiment. Randomly selects
either eips2017g_1 or eips2017g_2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert=8. Conjoint Experiment. Randomly selects
either eips2017g_1 or eips2017g_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2671] [Invalid:4226]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Choose eips2017g_1 |
1353 |
50.7% |
0.5065519 |
| 2 |
Choose eips2017g_2 |
1318 |
49.3% |
0.4934481 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4226 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_1_gender
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses gender for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses gender for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2671] [Invalid:4226]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Male |
1316 |
49.3% |
0.4926994 |
| 1 |
Female |
1355 |
50.7% |
0.5073006 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4226 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_2_gender
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses gender for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses gender for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2671] [Invalid:4226]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Male |
1370 |
51.3% |
0.5129165 |
| 1 |
Female |
1301 |
48.7% |
0.4870835 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4226 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_1_age
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses age for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses age for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2671] [Invalid:4226]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
28 |
943 |
35.3% |
0.3530513 |
| 2 |
45 |
826 |
30.9% |
0.3092475 |
| 3 |
71 |
902 |
33.8% |
0.3377012 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4226 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_2_age
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses age for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses age for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2671] [Invalid:4226]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
28 |
883 |
33.1% |
0.3305878 |
| 2 |
45 |
906 |
33.9% |
0.3391988 |
| 3 |
71 |
882 |
33.0% |
0.3302134 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4226 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_1_edu
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses completed level of education for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses completed level of education for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2671] [Invalid:4226]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
High school |
1318 |
49.3% |
0.4934481 |
| 1 |
University level |
1353 |
50.7% |
0.5065519 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4226 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_2_edu
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses completed level of education for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses completed level of education for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2671] [Invalid:4226]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
High school |
1298 |
48.6% |
0.4859603 |
| 1 |
University level |
1373 |
51.4% |
0.5140397 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4226 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_1_religion
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses religious background for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses religious background for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2671] [Invalid:4226]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No religion |
508 |
19.0% |
0.1901909 |
| 2 |
Christian |
531 |
19.9% |
0.1988019 |
| 3 |
Non-practicing Christian |
531 |
19.9% |
0.1988019 |
| 4 |
Muslim |
524 |
19.6% |
0.1961812 |
| 5 |
Non-practicing Muslim |
577 |
21.6% |
0.2160240 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4226 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_2_religion
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses religious background for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses religious background for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2671] [Invalid:4226]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No religion |
525 |
19.7% |
0.1965556 |
| 2 |
Christian |
545 |
20.4% |
0.2040434 |
| 3 |
Non-practicing Christian |
525 |
19.7% |
0.1965556 |
| 4 |
Muslim |
538 |
20.1% |
0.2014227 |
| 5 |
Non-practicing Muslim |
538 |
20.1% |
0.2014227 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4226 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_1_class
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses familiy background for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses familiy background for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2671] [Invalid:4226]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Working class |
890 |
33.3% |
0.3332085 |
| 2 |
Middle class |
907 |
34.0% |
0.3395732 |
| 3 |
Upper class |
874 |
32.7% |
0.3272183 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4226 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_2_class
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses family background for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses family background for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2671] [Invalid:4226]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Working class |
912 |
34.1% |
0.3414452 |
| 2 |
Middle class |
841 |
31.5% |
0.3148633 |
| 3 |
Upper class |
918 |
34.4% |
0.3436915 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4226 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_1
|
Variable label:
|
Political candidate that will agree most with your own political views
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we describe two hypothetical political candidates. Please read
the descriptions of each person carefully.
[Printout of the value of eips2017g_1_gender, eips2017g_2_gender,
eips2017g_1_age, eips2017g_2_age, eips2017g_1_edu, eips2017g_2_edu,
eips2017g_1_religion, eips2017g_2_religion, eips2017g_1_class,
eips2017g_2_class]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on your own judgment, please indicate which political candidate
you think will agree most with your own political views.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and eips2017g_ran=1. Conjoint experiment. The
respondents are exposed to two political candidates. The characteristics
of the candidates is chosen at random. See background variables. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Candidate 1 |
648 |
47.9% |
0.4789357 |
| 2 |
Candidate 2 |
647 |
47.8% |
0.4781966 |
| 97 |
No answer |
58 |
4.3% |
0.0428677 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5544 |
|
NA |
eips2017g_2
|
Variable label:
|
Relying on given information, which candidate would you prefer as
political representative at the national level?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we describe two hypothetical political candidates. Please read
the descriptions of each person carefully.
[Printout of the value of eips2017g_1_gender, eips2017g_2_gender,
eips2017g_1_age, eips2017g_2_age, eips2017g_1_edu, eips2017g_2_edu,
eips2017g_1_religion, eips2017g_2_religion, eips2017g_1_class,
eips2017g_2_class]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Relying solely on this information, which political candidate would you
prefer as your political representative at the national level?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and eips2017g_ran=2. Conjoint experiment. The
respondents are exposed to two political candidates. The characteristics
of the candidates is chosen at random. See background variables. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Candidate 1 |
641 |
48.6% |
0.48634294 |
| 2 |
Candidate 2 |
611 |
46.4% |
0.46358118 |
| 97 |
No answer |
66 |
5.0% |
0.05007587 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5579 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert=8. Randomly selects either eips2017h_1 or
eips2017h_2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert=8. Randomly selects either eips2017h_1 or
eips2017h_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Choose eips2017h_1. |
1300 |
48.7% |
0.4870738 |
| 2 |
Choose eips2017h_2. |
1369 |
51.3% |
0.5129262 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1_gender
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses gender for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses gender for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Male |
1347 |
50.5% |
0.5046834 |
| 1 |
Female |
1322 |
49.5% |
0.4953166 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2_gender
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses gender for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses gender for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Male |
1393 |
52.2% |
0.5219183 |
| 1 |
Female |
1276 |
47.8% |
0.4780817 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1_edu
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses completed level of education for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses completed level of education for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
High school |
1280 |
48.0% |
0.4795804 |
| 2 |
University level |
1389 |
52.0% |
0.5204196 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2_edu
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses completed level of education for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses completed level of education for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
High school |
1378 |
51.6% |
0.5162982 |
| 2 |
University level |
1291 |
48.4% |
0.4837018 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1_age
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses age for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses age for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
30's |
1305 |
48.9% |
0.4889472 |
| 2 |
50's |
1364 |
51.1% |
0.5110528 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2_age
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses age for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses age for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
30's |
1350 |
50.6% |
0.5058074 |
| 2 |
50's |
1319 |
49.4% |
0.4941926 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1_class
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses familiy background for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses familiy background for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Working class |
888 |
33.3% |
0.3327089 |
| 2 |
Middle class |
882 |
33.0% |
0.3304608 |
| 3 |
Upper class |
899 |
33.7% |
0.3368303 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2_class
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses family background for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses family background for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Working class |
900 |
33.7% |
0.3372049 |
| 2 |
Middle class |
918 |
34.4% |
0.3439490 |
| 3 |
Upper class |
851 |
31.9% |
0.3188460 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1_occupation
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses occupation for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses occupation for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Politician |
558 |
20.9% |
0.2090671 |
| 2 |
Business leader |
526 |
19.7% |
0.1970776 |
| 3 |
TV Celebrity |
571 |
21.4% |
0.2139378 |
| 4 |
Industry worker |
506 |
19.0% |
0.1895841 |
| 5 |
Farmer |
508 |
19.0% |
0.1903335 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2_occupation
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses occupation for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses occupation for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Politician |
554 |
20.8% |
0.2075684 |
| 2 |
Business leader |
504 |
18.9% |
0.1888348 |
| 3 |
TV Celebrity |
522 |
19.6% |
0.1955789 |
| 4 |
Industry worker |
530 |
19.9% |
0.1985762 |
| 5 |
Farmer |
559 |
20.9% |
0.2094417 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1_polex
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses the political experience for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses the political experience for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
942 |
35.3% |
0.3529412 |
| 2 |
Limited |
883 |
33.1% |
0.3308355 |
| 3 |
Extensive |
844 |
31.6% |
0.3162233 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2_polex
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses the political experience for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses the political experience for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
875 |
32.8% |
0.3278381 |
| 2 |
Limited |
897 |
33.6% |
0.3360809 |
| 3 |
Extensive |
897 |
33.6% |
0.3360809 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1_workplace
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses workplace for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses workplace for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Brussel |
862 |
32.3% |
0.3229674 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
882 |
33.0% |
0.3304608 |
| 3 |
In your home region |
925 |
34.7% |
0.3465717 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2_workplace
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses workplace for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses workplace for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Brussel |
930 |
34.8% |
0.3484451 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
890 |
33.3% |
0.3334582 |
| 3 |
In your home region |
849 |
31.8% |
0.3180967 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1_media
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses a news story for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses a news story for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Endorsed candidate |
909 |
34.1% |
0.3405770 |
| 2 |
Critized candidate |
878 |
32.9% |
0.3289622 |
| 3 |
Ridiculed candidate |
882 |
33.0% |
0.3304608 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2_media
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses a news story for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses a news story for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Endorsed candidate |
891 |
33.4% |
0.3338329 |
| 2 |
Critized candidate |
903 |
33.8% |
0.3383290 |
| 3 |
Ridiculed candidate |
875 |
32.8% |
0.3278381 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1_ideology
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses the political ideology for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses the political ideology for candidate 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
On the left |
1335 |
50.0% |
0.5001873 |
| 2 |
On the right |
1334 |
50.0% |
0.4998127 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2_ideology
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses the political ideology for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses the political ideology for candidate 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
On the left |
1341 |
50.2% |
0.5024354 |
| 2 |
On the right |
1328 |
49.8% |
0.4975646 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1_immigration
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses candidate 1’s attitude towards immigration.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses candidate 1’s attitude towards immigration.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Bad for the country |
1331 |
49.9% |
0.4986886 |
| 2 |
Good for the country |
1338 |
50.1% |
0.5013114 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2_immigration
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses candidate 2’s attitude towards immigration.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses candidate 2’s attitude towards immigration.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Bad for the country |
1320 |
49.5% |
0.4945673 |
| 2 |
Good for the country |
1349 |
50.5% |
0.5054327 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1_eumembership
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses candidate 1’s attitude towards membership in EU.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses candidate 1’s attitude towards membership in EU.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favor of referendum on EU membership |
1346 |
50.4% |
0.5043087 |
| 2 |
Against referendum on EU membership |
1323 |
49.6% |
0.4956913 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2_eumembership
|
Variable label:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses candidate 2’s attitude towards membership in EU.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Background variable for conjoint experiment.
Randomly chooses candidate 2’s attitude towards membership in EU.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2669] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favor of referendum on EU membership |
1332 |
49.9% |
0.4990633 |
| 2 |
Against referendum on EU membership |
1337 |
50.1% |
0.5009367 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1a
|
Variable label:
|
Description of two candidates: Who would you choose, national elections
tomorrow
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we describe two hypothetical political candidates. Please read
the descriptions of each person carefully.
[Printout of the value of eips2017h_1_gender, eips2017h_2_gender,
eips2017h_1_edu, eips2017h_2_edu, eips2017h_1_age, eips2017h_2_age,
eips2017h_1_class, eips2017h_2_class, eips2017h_1_occupation,
eips2017h_2_occupation, eips2017h_1_polex, eips2017h_2_polex,
eips2017h_1_workplace, eips2017h_2_workplace, eips2017h_1_media,
eips2017h_2_media, eips2017h_1_ideology, eips2017h_2_ideology,
eips2017h_1_immigration, eips2017h_2_immigration,
eips2017h_1_eumembership, eips2017h_2_eumembership]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If there were national elections tomorrow and you had to vote for one of
these two candidates, which candidate would you choose?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and eips2017h_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Candidate 1 |
633 |
48.7% |
0.48692308 |
| 2 |
Candidate 2 |
616 |
47.4% |
0.47384615 |
| 97 |
No answer |
51 |
3.9% |
0.03923077 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5597 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_1b
|
Variable label:
|
Candidate who is most likely to represent the concerns of ordinary
people in your country
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which candidate is in your view most likely to represent the concerns of
ordinary people in your country?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and eips2017h_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Candidate 1 |
617 |
47.5% |
0.47461538 |
| 2 |
Candidate 2 |
611 |
47.0% |
0.47000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
72 |
5.5% |
0.05538462 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5597 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2a
|
Variable label:
|
Description of two candidates: Candidate who is most likely to represent
the concerns of ordinary people in your country
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we describe two hypothetical political candidates. Please read
the descriptions of each person carefully.
[Printout of the value of eips2017h_1_gender, eips2017h_2_gender,
eips2017h_1_edu, eips2017h_2_edu, eips2017h_1_age, eips2017h_2_age,
eips2017h_1_class, eips2017h_2_class, eips2017h_1_occupation,
eips2017h_2_occupation, eips2017h_1_polex, eips2017h_2_polex,
eips2017h_1_workplace, eips2017h_2_workplace, eips2017h_1_media,
eips2017h_2_media, eips2017h_1_ideology, eips2017h_2_ideology,
eips2017h_1_immigration, eips2017h_2_immigration,
eips2017h_1_eumembership, eips2017h_2_eumembership]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which candidate is in your view most likely to represent the concerns of
ordinary people in your country?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and eips2017h_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Candidate 1 |
663 |
48.4% |
0.48429511 |
| 2 |
Candidate 2 |
640 |
46.7% |
0.46749452 |
| 97 |
No answer |
66 |
4.8% |
0.04821037 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5528 |
|
NA |
eips2017h_2b
|
Variable label:
|
Who would you choose, national elections tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
If there were national elections tomorrow and you had to vote for one of
these two candidates, which candidate would you choose?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and eips2017h_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Candidate 1 |
634 |
46.3% |
0.46311176 |
| 2 |
Candidate 2 |
648 |
47.3% |
0.47333820 |
| 97 |
No answer |
87 |
6.4% |
0.06355004 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5528 |
|
NA |
eips2017i_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert=8. Randomly selects [The Progress party/ The
Liberal party/ Christian church / Muslim community / An anti-Islamic
group / A neo-Nazi group /A Muslim fundamentalist group] to question
EIPS2017I.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert=8. Randomly selects [The Progress party/ The
Liberal party/ Christian church / Muslim community / An anti-Islamic
group / A neo-Nazi group /A Muslim fundamentalist group] to question
eips2017i.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2661] [Invalid:4236]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Progress party |
394 |
14.8% |
0.1480646 |
| 2 |
The Liberal party |
380 |
14.3% |
0.1428035 |
| 3 |
Christian church |
407 |
15.3% |
0.1529500 |
| 4 |
Muslim community |
357 |
13.4% |
0.1341601 |
| 5 |
An anti-Islamic group |
363 |
13.6% |
0.1364149 |
| 6 |
A neo-Nazi group |
370 |
13.9% |
0.1390455 |
| 7 |
A Muslim fundamentalist group |
390 |
14.7% |
0.1465614 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4236 |
|
NA |
eips2017i
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: [The Progress party/ The Liberal party/ Christian church
/ Muslim community / An anti-Islamic group / A neo-Nazi group /A Muslim
fundamentalist group] has asked to rent local community house, should
they be allowed?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that [The Progress party/ The Liberal party/ Christian church /
Muslim community / An anti-Islamic group / A neo-Nazi group /A Muslim
fundamentalist group] has asked to rent a local community house in order
to hold a meeting for its members and sympathizers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree that the [The Progress party/ The Liberal
party/ Christian church / Muslim community / An anti-Islamic group / A
neo-Nazi group /A Muslim fundamentalist group] should be allowed to rent
the local community house for this purpose?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Do not agree at all |
503 |
18.6% |
0.18588322 |
| 2 |
1 |
99 |
3.7% |
0.03658537 |
| 3 |
2 |
110 |
4.1% |
0.04065041 |
| 4 |
3 |
98 |
3.6% |
0.03621582 |
| 5 |
4 |
83 |
3.1% |
0.03067258 |
| 6 |
5 |
297 |
11.0% |
0.10975610 |
| 7 |
6 |
84 |
3.1% |
0.03104213 |
| 8 |
7 |
144 |
5.3% |
0.05321508 |
| 9 |
8 |
197 |
7.3% |
0.07280118 |
| 10 |
9 |
114 |
4.2% |
0.04212860 |
| 11 |
10 Completely agree |
899 |
33.2% |
0.33222469 |
| 97 |
No answer |
78 |
2.9% |
0.02882483 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4191 |
|
NA |
r9helse1_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert=8. Randomly selects r9helse1a or r9helse1b.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert=8. Randomly selects r9helse1a or r9helse1b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2657] [Invalid:4240]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Choose r9helse1a. |
1336 |
50.3% |
0.5028227 |
| 2 |
Choose r9helse1ab. |
1321 |
49.7% |
0.4971773 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4240 |
|
NA |
r9helse1a
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the word antibiotics [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the word antibiotics?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and r9helse1_ran=1.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r9helse1b
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the term “antibiotics-resistant bacteria”
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the term “antibiotics-resistant
bacteria”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and r9helse1_ran=2.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r9helse3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Should spend fewer resources on treatment of illnesses
due to smoking/alcohol/narcotics
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many people become ill because of a lifestyle that includes smoking,
high alcohol consumption, abuse of medications or narcotic substances.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree that the authorities should spend fewer
resources on treatment of illnesses that are due to these types of
lifestyle (for example, that the patient should pay a higher co-pay fee
or get a less expensive treatment than other patients get)?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Afterwards, we will ask you to justify your answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
584 |
21.6% |
0.21581670 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
2028 |
74.9% |
0.74944568 |
| 97 |
No answer |
94 |
3.5% |
0.03473762 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4191 |
|
NA |
r9helse3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Explanation why you agree on spending fewer resources [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you explain why you answered that you agree that the authorities
should spend fewer resources to treat these kinds of lifestyle-related
illnesses?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and r9helse3=1.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r9helse3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Explanation why you disagree on spending fewer resources [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you explain why you answered that you disagree that the authorities
should spend fewer resources to treat these kinds of lifestyle-related
illnesses?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and r9helse3=2.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r9helse2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Perception, Norwegian public health system: Confident that you will be
given good treatment if you become acutely and seriously ill
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We want to ask you a few questions related to your perception of how the
Norwegian public health service functions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How confident do you feel that you will be given good treatment in the
public healthcare system if you should become acutely and seriously ill?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very confident |
846 |
31.3% |
0.312638581 |
| 2 |
Confident |
1234 |
45.6% |
0.456023651 |
| 3 |
Somewhat confident |
341 |
12.6% |
0.126016260 |
| 4 |
Neither confident nor unconfident |
59 |
2.2% |
0.021803400 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unconfident |
88 |
3.3% |
0.032520325 |
| 6 |
Unconfident |
45 |
1.7% |
0.016629712 |
| 7 |
Very unconfident |
20 |
0.7% |
0.007390983 |
| 97 |
No answer |
73 |
2.7% |
0.026977088 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4191 |
|
NA |
r9helse2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Perception, Norwegian public health system: Confident that you will be
given good treatment if you become seriously ill, not acutely
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We want to ask you a few questions related to your perception of how the
Norwegian public health service functions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How confident do you feel that you will be given good treatment in the
public healthcare system if you should become seriously sick (but not
acutely)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very confident |
546 |
20.2% |
0.20177384 |
| 2 |
Confident |
1231 |
45.5% |
0.45491500 |
| 3 |
Somewhat confident |
548 |
20.3% |
0.20251293 |
| 4 |
Neither confident nor unconfident |
92 |
3.4% |
0.03399852 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unconfident |
132 |
4.9% |
0.04878049 |
| 6 |
Unconfident |
59 |
2.2% |
0.02180340 |
| 7 |
Very unconfident |
23 |
0.8% |
0.00849963 |
| 97 |
No answer |
75 |
2.8% |
0.02771619 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4191 |
|
NA |
r9helse2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Perception, Norwegian public health system: Confident that you will be
given good treatment if you experience a troublesome condition, neither
acutely or seriously ill
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We want to ask you a few questions related to your perception of how the
Norwegian public health service functions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How confident do you feel that you will be given good treatment in the
public healthcare system if you should experience a troublesome
condition (but not acute or serious illness)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6897] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very confident |
281 |
10.4% |
0.10384331 |
| 2 |
Confident |
871 |
32.2% |
0.32187731< |
