Codebook

The Panel of Public Administrators

KODEM

Round 1

v-102 - 2024-06-19









Produced by ideas2evidence










Citation

Scientific committee for KODEM

Name Affiliaton
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten UiB
Anne Lise Fimreite UiB
Rune Karlsen UiO
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø NORCE
Johannes Bergh ISF
Jarle Trondal UiA

Responsible for KODEM-panels

Panel Name
NMP Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
NRP Yvette Peters
NJP Erik Knudsen
NFP Jarle Trondal, Tobias Bach, Jacob Aars

Coordinating team

Name
Erla Løvseth
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
Soran Hajo Dahl

Producers

Name Affiliation Role
Øivind Skjervheim ideas2evidence Coordinator
Olav Bjørnebekk ideas2evidence Project team member
Amund Eikrem ideas2evidence Project team member
Joachim Wettergreen ideas2evidence Project team member
Asle Høgestøl ideas2evidence Quality assurance

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators (NFP) is an internet-based survey of public administrators. The study deals with matters that are important to society, public administration and democracy. The panel is initiated and run by researchers from the leading reseach universities and institutions in Norway and is a non-profit project that aims to serve research goals. The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators seeks to contribute in a dialogue between research, politics and socitey.

Some of the questions in this survey are part of a coordinated system of surveys (“KODEM”) which also gathers information about beliefs and convictions of citizens (uib.no/medborger), elected representatives (uib.no/representant), and from journalists and editors (uib.no/NJP). This mode of data collection enables innovative research of groups that together comprise the political body in Norway.

The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators is part of the Digital Social Science Core Facility (DIGSSCORE) at the University of Bergen (UiB). The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators is also affiliated with the Norwegian citizen Panel, the Norwegian Journalist Panel, and the Panel of Elected Representatives. The University of Bergen is the owner and treatment manager of the The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators. Ideas2Evidence executes the practical implementation of the survey, and are responsible for recruting participants, as well as sending and receiving surveys to and from respondents. The data is stored encrypted and secure in UiB’s infrastructure for for safe processing of sensitive personal data in research, ‘SAFE’. The panel has been reported to and processed by the Data Protection Official for Research at Sikt - Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research. More information can be found at uib.no/en/nfp.

Scope

Geographic coverage: National.
Unit of analysis: Central government employees.
Universe: All employees of the central government.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

All employees of the central government - ministries, directorates and supervisory authorities - are invited to participate in the Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators. Contact information has been collected through “Depkatalog” or the website of the individual directorate or supervisory authority.

In this establishment round of the panel, only employees of the central government have been recruited. The long term goal is to recruit public administrators from all levels of public administration.

Due to some over-coverage during the recruitment process, there are N = 24 respondents who have been excluded after the field period, as they did not belong to the defined target population, that is, not working in public administration in the central government (ministries, directorates, and supervisory authorities). We therefore recommend excluding these respondents when conducting analyses. This can be done using the variable f1_tvcpa. For more information on the exclusion process and exclusion criteria, please consult the documentation report.

Mode of Data Collection

The survey is based on an online questionnaire where the panel members are invited by email.

For a more detailed description on recruitment of panel members, please see the documentation report.

Wave 1 was fielded from 2nd of November 2020 to the 8th of April 2021.


Change Log

Version Release date / Date changed Variable Changes and notes
v-102 2024-06-19 NA Revised release of round 1
v-102 2024-06-07 NA Revised release of round 1
NA 2024-06-05 f1_tvcpa Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj3_recode Added f1k1kj3_recode in order to separate education levels in each round from P4_1 with accumulated values.
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_1_coded New variable: New version of f1k1kj103_1_coded that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_2_coded New variable: New version of f1k1kj103_2_coded that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_3_coded New variable: New version of f1k1kj103_3_coded that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_4_coded New variable: New version of f1k1kj103_4_coded that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_5_coded New variable: New version of f1k1kj103_5_coded that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj111_coded New variable: New version of f1k1kj111_coded that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj6_coded New variable: New version of f1k1kj6_coded that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj3_recode_coded New variable: New version of f1k1kj3_recode_coded that also includes coded other-statements
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj3_recode Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_1_coded Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_2_coded Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_3_coded Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_4_coded Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_5_coded Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj111_coded Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj6_coded Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj3_recode_coded Variable documentation inserted
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_1_coded Variable documentation updated
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_2_coded Variable documentation updated
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_3_coded Variable documentation updated
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_4_coded Variable documentation updated
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj103_5_coded Variable documentation updated
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj111_coded Variable documentation updated
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj6_coded Variable documentation updated
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj3_recode_coded Variable documentation updated
NA 2021-08-20 f1k1kj3_recode Variable documentation updated
v-101 2021-08-20 NA Revised release of round 1
v-100 2021-06-07 NA Initial release of round 1


Dataset contents

File name The Panel of Public Administrators - round 1k1 - v-102-L.sav
Distribution type Privileged
# Cases 2279
# Variables 175


Variable Documentation

responseid


Variable label: responseid
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



f1interview_start


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



f1interview_end


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2104] [Invalid:175] [Range:-]



f1browsertype


Variable label: [Browertype used by respondent]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Browertype used by respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



f1browserversion


Variable label: [Browser version used by respondent]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Browser version used by respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



f1mobil


Variable label: [Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Determines if the respondents uses mobile]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Mobile 147 6.5% 0.06450197
0 Other 2132 93.5% 0.93549803


f1opplosning


Variable label: [Screen resolution of the applied device]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Screen resolution of the applied device]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



f1enhetstype


Variable label: [Determines respondents device type]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Determines respondents device type]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 PC 2134 93.6% 0.9363756
2 Touch 145 6.4% 0.0636244
3 Generic 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1advancedwifeaturesenabled


Variable label: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



f1getrenderingmode


Variable label: [Detects the browsers rendering mode]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Detects the browsers rendering mode]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



f1group


Variable label: [Randomized for all respondents]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Randomized for all respondents]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group 1 1152 50.5% 0.5054849
2 Group 2 1127 49.5% 0.4945151


f1k1kj102_1


Variable label: Main tasks in your work: Administrative tasks
Pre-question text: Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
Literal question: Administrative tasks (e.g. payroll and human resources management, organisational development, management and performance reporting, ICT, operations and maintenance)
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1662 72.9% 0.7292672
1 Selected 617 27.1% 0.2707328
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj102_2


Variable label: Main tasks in your work: Budgeting
Pre-question text: Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
Literal question: Budgeting
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2065 90.6% 0.90609917
1 Selected 214 9.4% 0.09390083
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.00000000


f1k1kj102_3


Variable label: Main tasks in your work: Preparation/modification/implementation of laws
Pre-question text: Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
Literal question: Preparation/modification/implementation of laws and regulations etc.
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1879 82.4% 0.8244844
1 Selected 400 17.6% 0.1755156
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj102_4


Variable label: Main tasks in your work: Investigation, planning, analysis
Pre-question text: Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
Literal question: Investigation, planning, analysis
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1184 52.0% 0.5195261
1 Selected 1095 48.0% 0.4804739
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj102_5


Variable label: Main tasks in your work: Leadership and/or organisational development
Pre-question text: Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
Literal question: Leadership and/or organisational development
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1787 78.4% 0.7841158
1 Selected 492 21.6% 0.2158842
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj102_6


Variable label: Main tasks in your work: Coordination
Pre-question text: Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
Literal question: Coordination
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1442 63.3% 0.6327337
1 Selected 837 36.7% 0.3672663
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj102_7


Variable label: Main tasks in your work: Case management/individual decisions
Pre-question text: Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
Literal question: Case management/individual decisions (cases concerning specific persons, companies, institutions, etc.)
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1502 65.9% 0.659061
1 Selected 777 34.1% 0.340939
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.000000


f1k1kj102_8


Variable label: Main tasks in your work: Control/supervision/follow-up of public measures
Pre-question text: Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
Literal question: Control/supervision/follow-up of public measures
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1934 84.9% 0.8486178
1 Selected 345 15.1% 0.1513822
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj102_9


Variable label: Main tasks in your work: Information and communication work
Pre-question text: Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
Literal question: Information and communication work
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1774 77.8% 0.7784116
1 Selected 505 22.2% 0.2215884
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj102_10


Variable label: Main tasks in your work: User inquiries/frontline services/client services
Pre-question text: Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
Literal question: User inquiries/frontline services/client services
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1976 86.7% 0.867047
1 Selected 303 13.3% 0.132953
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.000000


f1k1kj103_1


Variable label: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Law
Pre-question text: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
Literal question: Law
Post-question: You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1956 85.8% 0.8582712
1 Selected 323 14.2% 0.1417288
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj103_2


Variable label: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Finance/Management
Pre-question text: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
Literal question: Finance/Management
Post-question: You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1828 80.2% 0.8021062
1 Selected 451 19.8% 0.1978938
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj103_3


Variable label: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Political Science/Public Administration
Pre-question text: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
Literal question: Political Science/Public Administration
Post-question: You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1700 74.6% 0.7459412
1 Selected 579 25.4% 0.2540588
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj103_4


Variable label: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Medicine
Pre-question text: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
Literal question: Medicine
Post-question: You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2255 98.9% 0.98946907
1 Selected 24 1.1% 0.01053093
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.00000000


f1k1kj103_5


Variable label: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Science/Engineering
Pre-question text: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
Literal question: Science/Engineering
Post-question: You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1882 82.6% 0.8258008
1 Selected 397 17.4% 0.1741992
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj103_6


Variable label: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Other
Pre-question text: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
Literal question: Other (please specify)
Post-question: You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1620 71.1% 0.7108381
1 Selected 659 28.9% 0.2891619
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj103_6_other


Variable label: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Other
Pre-question text: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
Literal question: Other (please specify)
Post-question: You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2279] [Range:-]



f1k1kj103_1_coded


Variable label: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Law [coded]
Pre-question text: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
Literal question: Law
Post-question: You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Alle respondenter spurt]

]

[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source variable f1k1kj103_1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1955 85.8% 0.8578324
1 Selected 324 14.2% 0.1421676
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj103_2_coded


Variable label: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Finance/Management [coded]
Pre-question text: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
Literal question: Finance/Management
Post-question: You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Alle respondenter spurt]

[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source variable f1k1kj103_2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1796 78.8% 0.7880649
1 Selected 483 21.2% 0.2119351
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj103_3_coded


Variable label: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Political Science/Public Administration [coded]
Pre-question text: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
Literal question: Political Science/Public Administration
Post-question: You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Alle respondenter spurt]

[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source variable f1k1kj103_3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1689 74.1% 0.7411145
1 Selected 590 25.9% 0.2588855
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj103_4_coded


Variable label: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Medicine [coded]
Pre-question text: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
Literal question: Medicine
Post-question: You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Alle respondenter spurt]

[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source variable f1k1kj103_4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2254 98.9% 0.98903028
1 Selected 25 1.1% 0.01096972
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.00000000


f1k1kj103_5_coded


Variable label: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Science/Engineering [coded]
Pre-question text: Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
Literal question: Science/Engineering
Post-question: You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Alle respondenter spurt]

[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source variable f1k1kj103_5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1877 82.4% 0.8236068
1 Selected 402 17.6% 0.1763932
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.0000000


f1k1kj104


Variable label: What is your current position level?
Literal question: What is your current position level?
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Consultant/senior consultant or equivalent level 132 5.8% 0.057920140
2 Adviser/senior adviser or equivalent level 1487 65.2% 0.652479158
3 Director/special adviser or equivalent level 312 13.7% 0.136902150
4 Deputy Director or equivalent level 252 11.1% 0.110574814
5 Director General or equivalent level and above 75 3.3% 0.032909171
97 Not answered 21 0.9% 0.009214568


f1k1kj105_1


Variable label: How many years have you worked in your current position?
Pre-question text: How many years have you worked in…
Literal question: …your current position?
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Less than 1 year 331 14.5% 0.14523914
2 1 - 5 years 955 41.9% 0.41904344
3 6 – 10 years 432 19.0% 0.18955682
4 11 – 20 years 386 16.9% 0.16937253
5 More than 20 years 141 6.2% 0.06186924
97 Not answered 34 1.5% 0.01491882


f1k1kj105_2


Variable label: How many years in total have you worked in central government?
Pre-question text: How many years in total have you worked in…
Literal question: …central government (ministry/directorate/inspection authority)?
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Less than 1 year 87 3.8% 0.03817464
2 1 - 5 years 399 17.5% 0.17507679
3 6 – 10 years 367 16.1% 0.16103554
4 11 – 20 years 610 26.8% 0.26766125
5 More than 20 years 628 27.6% 0.27555946
97 Not answered 188 8.2% 0.08249232


f1k1kj106


Variable label: How often do you look for job opportunities outside your organisation?
Literal question: How often do you look for job opportunities outside your organisation?
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Never 592 26.0% 0.259763054
2 Rarely 905 39.7% 0.397103993
3 Occasionally 585 25.7% 0.256691531
4 Often 138 6.1% 0.060552874
5 Very often 49 2.2% 0.021500658
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.004387889


f1k1kj107


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Would very much like to work in this organisation for the rest of my professional life
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: I would very much like to work in this organisation for the rest of my professional life.
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 396 17.4% 0.173760421
2 Agree 591 25.9% 0.259324265
3 Somewhat agree 407 17.9% 0.178587100
4 Neither agree nor disagree 323 14.2% 0.141728828
5 Somewhat disagree 226 9.9% 0.099166301
6 Disagree 219 9.6% 0.096094778
7 Strongly disagree 105 4.6% 0.046072839
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.005265467


f1k1kj108


Variable label: Are you currently, or have you ever been, a member of any political party?
Literal question: Are you currently, or have you ever been, a member of any political party?
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes, I am a member 338 14.8% 0.148310663
2 Yes, I have been a member 377 16.5% 0.165423431
3 No 1552 68.1% 0.681000439
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.005265467


f1k1kj109


Variable label: Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2279] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 0 NaN
2 I have immigrated to Norway 0 NaN
3 Both of my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 0 NaN
4 My mother has immigrated to Norway, but my father and I have not immigrated 0 NaN
5 My father has immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I have not immigrated 0 NaN
97 Not answered 0 NaN
Sysmiss 2279 NA


f1k1kj109_recode


Variable label: Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Recoded version from f1k1kj109]

[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 2022 88.7% 0.887231242
2 Myself or one or both of my parents, have immigrated to Norway 244 10.7% 0.107064502
97 Not answered 13 0.6% 0.005704256


f1k1kj110


Variable label: Whether most people in general can be trusted
Literal question: Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 – Cannot be careful enough 6 0.3% 0.0026327337
1 1 2 0.1% 0.0008775779
2 2 19 0.8% 0.0083369899
3 3 38 1.7% 0.0166739798
4 4 41 1.8% 0.0179903466
5 5 127 5.6% 0.0557261957
6 6 159 7.0% 0.0697674419
7 7 462 20.3% 0.2027204914
8 8 682 29.9% 0.2992540588
9 9 390 17.1% 0.1711276876
10 10 – Most people can be trusted 342 15.0% 0.1500658183
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.0048266784


f1k1kj111


Variable label: Your civil status
Literal question: Civil status
Post-question: Click on the alternative that is most relevant
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Single 269 11.8% 0.1180342255
2 Non-domestic relationship 134 5.9% 0.0587977183
3 Cohabitant 447 19.6% 0.1961386573
4 Married/legally registered partner 1247 54.7% 0.5471698113
5 Divorced/separated/formerly a legally registered partner 134 5.9% 0.0587977183
6 Widow/widower 20 0.9% 0.0087757789
7 No response 15 0.7% 0.0065818341
8 Other: 2 0.1% 0.0008775779
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.0048266784


f1k1kj111_8_other


Variable label: Open: Your civil status
Pre-question text: Civil status
Literal question: Other:
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2279] [Range:-]



f1k1kj111_coded


Variable label: Your civil status [coded]
Literal question: Civil status
Post-question: Click on the alternative that is most relevant
Question owner: Tobias Bach (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Alle respondenter spurt]

[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source variable f1k1kj111]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Single 269 11.8% 0.118034226
2 Non-domestic relationship 134 5.9% 0.058797718
3 Cohabitant 447 19.6% 0.196138657
4 Married/legally registered partner 1247 54.7% 0.547169811
5 Divorced/separated/formerly a legally registered partner 136 6.0% 0.059675296
6 Widow/widower 20 0.9% 0.008775779
7 No response 15 0.7% 0.006581834
8 Other: 0 0.0% 0.000000000
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.004826678


f1k1media_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media plays an important role in highlighting the fates of individuals 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media plays an important role in highlighting the fates of individuals 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1media_1;p4k1media_1;r19k1media_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 198 17.2% 0.171875000
2 Agree 486 42.2% 0.421875000
3 Somewhat agree 290 25.2% 0.251736111
4 Neither agree nor disagree 89 7.7% 0.077256944
5 Somewhat disagree 48 4.2% 0.041666667
6 Disagree 26 2.3% 0.022569444
7 Strongly disagree 8 0.7% 0.006944444
97 Not answered 7 0.6% 0.006076389
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1media_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media plays an important role in revealing matters worthy of criticism 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media plays an important role in revealing matters worthy of criticism 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1media_2;p4k1media_2;r19k1media_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 683 59.3% 0.5928819444
2 Agree 384 33.3% 0.3333333333
3 Somewhat agree 65 5.6% 0.0564236111
4 Neither agree nor disagree 8 0.7% 0.0069444444
5 Somewhat disagree 4 0.3% 0.0034722222
6 Disagree 1 0.1% 0.0008680556
7 Strongly disagree 1 0.1% 0.0008680556
97 Not answered 6 0.5% 0.0052083333
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1media_3


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media is conflict-oriented 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media is conflict-oriented 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1media_3;p4k1media_3;r19k1media_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 284 24.7% 0.246527778
2 Agree 448 38.9% 0.388888889
3 Somewhat agree 289 25.1% 0.250868056
4 Neither agree nor disagree 88 7.6% 0.076388889
5 Somewhat disagree 27 2.3% 0.023437500
6 Disagree 7 0.6% 0.006076389
7 Strongly disagree 2 0.2% 0.001736111
97 Not answered 7 0.6% 0.006076389
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1media_4


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media sensationalises 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media sensationalises 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1media_4;p4k1media_4;r19k1media_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 389 33.8% 0.337673611
2 Agree 432 37.5% 0.375000000
3 Somewhat agree 272 23.6% 0.236111111
4 Neither agree nor disagree 33 2.9% 0.028645833
5 Somewhat disagree 13 1.1% 0.011284722
6 Disagree 5 0.4% 0.004340278
7 Strongly disagree 2 0.2% 0.001736111
97 Not answered 6 0.5% 0.005208333
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1media_5


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media conveys complicated issues in an understandable way 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media conveys complicated issues in an understandable way 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1media_5;p4k1media_5;r19k1media_5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 25 2.2% 0.021701389
2 Agree 308 26.7% 0.267361111
3 Somewhat agree 447 38.8% 0.388020833
4 Neither agree nor disagree 159 13.8% 0.138020833
5 Somewhat disagree 145 12.6% 0.125868056
6 Disagree 58 5.0% 0.050347222
7 Strongly disagree 4 0.3% 0.003472222
97 Not answered 6 0.5% 0.005208333
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1media_6


Variable label: Agree/disagree: News coverage is angled in a way that runs contrary to my own views
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: News coverage is angled in a way that runs contrary to my own views
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1media_6;p4k1media_6;r19k1media_6
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 14 1.2% 0.012152778
2 Agree 58 5.0% 0.050347222
3 Somewhat agree 170 14.8% 0.147569444
4 Neither agree nor disagree 501 43.5% 0.434895833
5 Somewhat disagree 137 11.9% 0.118923611
6 Disagree 241 20.9% 0.209201389
7 Strongly disagree 25 2.2% 0.021701389
97 Not answered 6 0.5% 0.005208333
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1lobby1_1


Variable label: The past year, how often how you received requests from: Business organisations
Pre-question text: How often have you received written or oral requests from the following types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
Literal question: Business organisations
Post-question: Tick each relevant organisation.
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1lobby1_1;p4k1lobby1_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly 65 5.6% 0.05642361
2 Monthly 204 17.7% 0.17708333
3 Less frequently 427 37.1% 0.37065972
4 Never 425 36.9% 0.36892361
97 Not answered 31 2.7% 0.02690972
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1lobby1_2


Variable label: The past year, how often how you received requests from: Trade unions/professional organisations
Pre-question text: How often have you received written or oral requests from the following types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
Literal question: Trade unions and professional organisations
Post-question: Tick each relevant organisation.
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1lobby1_2;p4k1lobby1_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly 71 6.2% 0.06163194
2 Monthly 298 25.9% 0.25868056
3 Less frequently 458 39.8% 0.39756944
4 Never 297 25.8% 0.25781250
97 Not answered 28 2.4% 0.02430556
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1lobby1_3


Variable label: The past year, how often how you received requests from: Environmental protection organisations
Pre-question text: How often have you received written or oral requests from the following types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
Literal question: Environmental protection organisations
Post-question: Tick each relevant organisation.
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1lobby1_3;p4k1lobby1_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly 21 1.8% 0.01822917
2 Monthly 114 9.9% 0.09895833
3 Less frequently 433 37.6% 0.37586806
4 Never 551 47.8% 0.47829861
97 Not answered 33 2.9% 0.02864583
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1lobby1_4


Variable label: The past year, how often how you received requests from: Health/welfare organisations
Pre-question text: How often have you received written or oral requests from the following types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
Literal question: Health/welfare organisations
Post-question: Tick each relevant organisation.
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1lobby1_4;p4k1lobby1_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly 25 2.2% 0.02170139
2 Monthly 127 11.0% 0.11024306
3 Less frequently 442 38.4% 0.38368056
4 Never 524 45.5% 0.45486111
97 Not answered 34 3.0% 0.02951389
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1lobby1_5


Variable label: The past year, how often how you received requests from: Cultural/sports/leisure organisations
Pre-question text: How often have you received written or oral requests from the following types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
Literal question: Cultural/sports/leisure organisations
Post-question: Tick each relevant organisation.
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1lobby1_5;p4k1lobby1_5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly 44 3.8% 0.03819444
2 Monthly 130 11.3% 0.11284722
3 Less frequently 404 35.1% 0.35069444
4 Never 538 46.7% 0.46701389
97 Not answered 36 3.1% 0.03125000
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1lobby1_6


Variable label: The past year, how often how you received requests from: PR agencies/communications agencies
Pre-question text: How often have you received written or oral requests from the following types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
Literal question: PR agencies/communications agencies
Post-question: Tick each relevant organisation.
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1lobby1_6;p4k1lobby1_6
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly 10 0.9% 0.008680556
2 Monthly 60 5.2% 0.052083333
3 Less frequently 342 29.7% 0.296875000
4 Never 708 61.5% 0.614583333
97 Not answered 32 2.8% 0.027777778
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1lobby102_1


Variable label: How often the processing of cases in your ministry/directorate is influenced by: Business organisations
Pre-question text: Generally speaking and in the ministry/directorate where you work, how often would you say that the following actors influence the processing of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest?
Literal question: Business organisations
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very often 68 5.9% 0.05902778
2 Quite often 229 19.9% 0.19878472
3 Sometimes 349 30.3% 0.30295139
4 Rarely 124 10.8% 0.10763889
5 Very rarely 153 13.3% 0.13281250
6 Never 154 13.4% 0.13368056
97 Not answered 75 6.5% 0.06510417
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1lobby102_2


Variable label: How often the processing of cases in your ministry/directorate is influenced by: Trade unions/professional organisations
Pre-question text: Generally speaking and in the ministry/directorate where you work, how often would you say that the following actors influence the processing of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest?
Literal question: Trade unions and professional organisations
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very often 45 3.9% 0.0390625
2 Quite often 206 17.9% 0.1788194
3 Sometimes 345 29.9% 0.2994792
4 Rarely 174 15.1% 0.1510417
5 Very rarely 161 14.0% 0.1397569
6 Never 140 12.2% 0.1215278
97 Not answered 81 7.0% 0.0703125
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1lobby102_3


Variable label: How often the processing of cases in your ministry/directorate is influenced by: Environmental protection organisations
Pre-question text: Generally speaking and in the ministry/directorate where you work, how often would you say that the following actors influence the processing of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest?
Literal question: Environmental protection organisations
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very often 43 3.7% 0.03732639
2 Quite often 123 10.7% 0.10677083
3 Sometimes 279 24.2% 0.24218750
4 Rarely 154 13.4% 0.13368056
5 Very rarely 213 18.5% 0.18489583
6 Never 260 22.6% 0.22569444
97 Not answered 80 6.9% 0.06944444
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1lobby102_4


Variable label: How often the processing of cases in your ministry/directorate is influenced by: Health/welfare organisations
Pre-question text: Generally speaking and in the ministry/directorate where you work, how often would you say that the following actors influence the processing of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest?
Literal question: Health/welfare organisations
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very often 29 2.5% 0.02517361
2 Quite often 99 8.6% 0.08593750
3 Sometimes 252 21.9% 0.21875000
4 Rarely 191 16.6% 0.16579861
5 Very rarely 240 20.8% 0.20833333
6 Never 258 22.4% 0.22395833
97 Not answered 83 7.2% 0.07204861
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1lobby102_5


Variable label: How often the processing of cases in your ministry/directorate is influenced by: Cultural/sports/leisure organisations
Pre-question text: Generally speaking and in the ministry/directorate where you work, how often would you say that the following actors influence the processing of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest?
Literal question: Cultural/sports/leisure organisations
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very often 21 1.8% 0.01822917
2 Quite often 64 5.6% 0.05555556
3 Sometimes 190 16.5% 0.16493056
4 Rarely 188 16.3% 0.16319444
5 Very rarely 267 23.2% 0.23177083
6 Never 333 28.9% 0.28906250
97 Not answered 89 7.7% 0.07725694
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1lobby102_6


Variable label: How often the processing of cases in your ministry/directorate is influenced by: PR agencies/communications agencies
Pre-question text: Generally speaking and in the ministry/directorate where you work, how often would you say that the following actors influence the processing of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest?
Literal question: PR agencies/communications agencies
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very often 20 1.7% 0.01736111
2 Quite often 75 6.5% 0.06510417
3 Sometimes 203 17.6% 0.17621528
4 Rarely 158 13.7% 0.13715278
5 Very rarely 275 23.9% 0.23871528
6 Never 329 28.6% 0.28559028
97 Not answered 92 8.0% 0.07986111
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1selvstyre1_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Respondents are randomly assigned into four groups. Tre experiment groups and one control group.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1_ran1;r19k1selvstyre1_ran1;p4k1selvstyre1_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 1]

[Experiment. Respondents are randomly assigned into four groups. Tre experiment groups and one control group.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1120] [Invalid:1159] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A 277 24.7% 0.2473214
2 B 299 26.7% 0.2669643
3 C 265 23.7% 0.2366071
4 D 279 24.9% 0.2491071
Sysmiss 1159 NA


f1k1selvstyre1a_1


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: Whether schools must close during a pandemic
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1a_1;p4k1selvstyre1a_1;r19k1selvstyre1a_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 14 5.1% 0.05054152
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 101 36.5% 0.36462094
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 82 29.6% 0.29602888
4 Mostly up to the state 57 20.6% 0.20577617
5 Totally up to the state 16 5.8% 0.05776173
97 Not answered 7 2.5% 0.02527076
98 Not asked 2002 NA


f1k1selvstyre1a_2


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: On the development of wind power in municipalities
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1a_2;p4k1selvstyre1a_2;r19k1selvstyre1a_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 18 6.5% 0.06498195
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 77 27.8% 0.27797834
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 81 29.2% 0.29241877
4 Mostly up to the state 73 26.4% 0.26353791
5 Totally up to the state 22 7.9% 0.07942238
97 Not answered 6 2.2% 0.02166065
98 Not asked 2002 NA


f1k1selvstyre1a_3


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the shoreline building can take place
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1a_3;p4k1selvstyre1a_3;r19k1selvstyre1a_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 11 4.0% 0.03971119
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 46 16.6% 0.16606498
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 49 17.7% 0.17689531
4 Mostly up to the state 120 43.3% 0.43321300
5 Totally up to the state 45 16.2% 0.16245487
97 Not answered 6 2.2% 0.02166065
98 Not asked 2002 NA


f1k1selvstyre1a_4


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How large primary school classes should be
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how large primary school classes should be?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1a_4;p4k1selvstyre1a_4;r19k1selvstyre1a_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 15 5.4% 0.05415162
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 75 27.1% 0.27075812
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 60 21.7% 0.21660650
4 Mostly up to the state 101 36.5% 0.36462094
5 Totally up to the state 20 7.2% 0.07220217
97 Not answered 6 2.2% 0.02166065
98 Not asked 2002 NA


f1k1selvstyre1b_primer


Variable label: Should it be up to the municipalities or the state to decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
Pre-question text: Imagine that there is a severe pandemic outbreak in Norway. Infection control experts disagree on whether closing schools will slow the pandemic.
Literal question: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide whether schools must be closed during a pandemic?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1b_primer;p4k1selvstyre1b_primer;r19k1selvstyre1b_primer
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 7 2.3% 0.02341137
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 67 22.4% 0.22408027
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 76 25.4% 0.25418060
4 Mostly up to the state 126 42.1% 0.42140468
5 Totally up to the state 19 6.4% 0.06354515
97 Not answered 4 1.3% 0.01337793
98 Not asked 1980 NA


f1k1selvstyre1b_1


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: On the development of wind power in municipalities
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1b_1;p4k1selvstyre1b_1;r19k1selvstyre1b_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 19 6.4% 0.06354515
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 77 25.8% 0.25752508
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 107 35.8% 0.35785953
4 Mostly up to the state 83 27.8% 0.27759197
5 Totally up to the state 10 3.3% 0.03344482
97 Not answered 3 1.0% 0.01003344
98 Not asked 1980 NA


f1k1selvstyre1b_2


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the shoreline building can take place
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1b_2;p4k1selvstyre1b_2;r19k1selvstyre1b_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 8 2.7% 0.02675585
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 49 16.4% 0.16387960
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 62 20.7% 0.20735786
4 Mostly up to the state 116 38.8% 0.38795987
5 Totally up to the state 60 20.1% 0.20066890
97 Not answered 4 1.3% 0.01337793
98 Not asked 1980 NA


f1k1selvstyre1b_3


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How large primary school classes should be
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how large primary school classes should be?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1b_3;p4k1selvstyre1b_3;r19k1selvstyre1b_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 8 2.7% 0.02675585
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 65 21.7% 0.21739130
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 79 26.4% 0.26421405
4 Mostly up to the state 95 31.8% 0.31772575
5 Totally up to the state 49 16.4% 0.16387960
97 Not answered 3 1.0% 0.01003344
98 Not asked 1980 NA


f1k1selvstyre1c_primer


Variable label: Should it be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide on the size of primary school classes?
Pre-question text: Imagine that the issue regarding the size of primary school classes is to be decided. The pedagogical community does not agree on which class size is best regarding the learning and well-being of pupils.
Literal question: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide on the size of primary school classes?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1c_primer;p4k1selvstyre1c_primer;r19k1selvstyre1c_primer
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 14 5.3% 0.05283019
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 72 27.2% 0.27169811
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 47 17.7% 0.17735849
4 Mostly up to the state 108 40.8% 0.40754717
5 Totally up to the state 21 7.9% 0.07924528
97 Not answered 3 1.1% 0.01132075
98 Not asked 2014 NA


f1k1selvstyre1c_1


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: On the development of wind power in municipalities
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1c_1;p4k1selvstyre1c_1;r19k1selvstyre1c_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 26 9.8% 0.09811321
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 70 26.4% 0.26415094
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 77 29.1% 0.29056604
4 Mostly up to the state 74 27.9% 0.27924528
5 Totally up to the state 15 5.7% 0.05660377
97 Not answered 3 1.1% 0.01132075
98 Not asked 2014 NA


f1k1selvstyre1c_2


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the shoreline building can take place
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1c_2;p4k1selvstyre1c_2;r19k1selvstyre1c_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 12 4.5% 0.04528302
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 44 16.6% 0.16603774
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 50 18.9% 0.18867925
4 Mostly up to the state 105 39.6% 0.39622642
5 Totally up to the state 52 19.6% 0.19622642
97 Not answered 2 0.8% 0.00754717
98 Not asked 2014 NA


f1k1selvstyre1c_3


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the get state to decide: Whether schools must close during a pandemic
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1c_3;p4k1selvstyre1c_3;r19k1selvstyre1c_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 16 6.0% 0.06037736
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 84 31.7% 0.31698113
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 82 30.9% 0.30943396
4 Mostly up to the state 61 23.0% 0.23018868
5 Totally up to the state 20 7.5% 0.07547170
97 Not answered 2 0.8% 0.00754717
98 Not asked 2014 NA


f1k1selvstyre1d_primer


Variable label: Should it be up to the municipalities or to the state to decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Pre-question text: Imagine that a committee proposes significant wind power development in Norway. Environmental management experts disagree on whether the value of climate-friendly energy can justify the damage to nature that will result from the development.
Literal question: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1d_primer;p4k1selvstyre1d_primer;r19k1selvstyre1d_primer
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 18 6.5% 0.06451613
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 72 25.8% 0.25806452
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 82 29.4% 0.29390681
4 Mostly up to the state 93 33.3% 0.33333333
5 Totally up to the state 11 3.9% 0.03942652
97 Not answered 3 1.1% 0.01075269
98 Not asked 2000 NA


f1k1selvstyre1d_1


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: Whether schools must close during a pandemic
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1d_1;p4k1selvstyre1d_1;r19k1selvstyre1d_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 22 7.9% 0.07885305
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 103 36.9% 0.36917563
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 74 26.5% 0.26523297
4 Mostly up to the state 65 23.3% 0.23297491
5 Totally up to the state 12 4.3% 0.04301075
97 Not answered 3 1.1% 0.01075269
98 Not asked 2000 NA


f1k1selvstyre1d_2


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the shoreline building can take place
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1d_2;p4k1selvstyre1d_2;r19k1selvstyre1d_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 16 5.7% 0.05734767
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 40 14.3% 0.14336918
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 54 19.4% 0.19354839
4 Mostly up to the state 119 42.7% 0.42652330
5 Totally up to the state 46 16.5% 0.16487455
97 Not answered 4 1.4% 0.01433692
98 Not asked 2000 NA


f1k1selvstyre1d_3


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How large primary school classes should be
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how large primary school classes should be?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1d_3;p4k1selvstyre1d_3;r19k1selvstyre1d_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 19 6.8% 0.06810036
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 60 21.5% 0.21505376
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 52 18.6% 0.18637993
4 Mostly up to the state 110 39.4% 0.39426523
5 Totally up to the state 34 12.2% 0.12186380
97 Not answered 4 1.4% 0.01433692
98 Not asked 2000 NA


f1k1selvstyre2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Norwegian democracy could have worked just as well without local self-government
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement:
Literal question: Norwegian democracy could have worked just as well without local self-government.
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre2;p4k1selvstyre2;r19k1selvstyre2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 17 1.5% 0.01475694
2 Agree 33 2.9% 0.02864583
3 Somewhat agree 74 6.4% 0.06423611
4 Neither agree nor disagree 78 6.8% 0.06770833
5 Somewhat disagree 150 13.0% 0.13020833
6 Disagree 438 38.0% 0.38020833
7 Strongly disagree 318 27.6% 0.27604167
97 Not answered 44 3.8% 0.03819444
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1dommere1


Variable label: To what extent appointment of Supreme Court justices should take into account social and cultural diversity
Pre-question text: Provided that applicants to the Supreme Court of Norway’s judicial offices have the necessary professional qualifications, applicant assessments may also take into account that the Supreme Court should reflect Norway both socially and culturally.
Literal question: To what extent do you think that the appointment of Supreme Court justices should take into account the social and cultural diversity found in society?
Question owner: Gunnar Grendstad (UiB); Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB); Jon Kåre Skiple (NORCE); Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE); Ingvild Misje (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1dommere1;p4k1dommere1;r19k1dommere1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 145 12.6% 0.12586806
2 To a large extent 344 29.9% 0.29861111
3 To some extent 403 35.0% 0.34982639
4 To a small extent 136 11.8% 0.11805556
5 Not at all 73 6.3% 0.06336806
97 Not answered 51 4.4% 0.04427083
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1dommere2


Variable label: To what extent Supreme Court justices must have ‘insight and involvement in general societal issues’
Pre-question text: The assessment of applicants to the judicial offices must follow the applicable guidelines.
Literal question: To what extent do you agree with the guidelines that say Supreme Court justices must have ‘insight and involvement in general societal issues’?
Question owner: Gunnar Grendstad (UiB); Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB); Jon Kåre Skiple (NORCE); Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE); Ingvild Misje (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1dommere2;p4k1dommere2;r19k1dommere2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 343 29.8% 0.297743056
2 To a large extent 524 45.5% 0.454861111
3 To some extent 194 16.8% 0.168402778
4 To a small extent 31 2.7% 0.026909722
5 Not at all 5 0.4% 0.004340278
97 Not answered 55 4.8% 0.047743056
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1dommere3_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1dommere3.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1dommere3_ran1;p4k1dommere3_ran1;r19k1dommere3_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1dommere3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1107] [Invalid:1172] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 529 47.8% 0.4778681
2 14 out of 20 justices are born in the Oslo area, 18 out of 20 justices have been educated in Oslo, and 17 of the justices have spent at least 80 percent of their working lives in Oslo. 578 52.2% 0.5221319
Sysmiss 1172 NA


f1k1dommere3


Variable label: How important that the Supreme Court of Norway has a composition of justices that reflects Norway geographically
Pre-question text:

The Supreme Court of Norway is the judicial branch and makes an increasing number of decisions that bring the court of law closer to the Storting which is the legislative branch. [k1dommere3_ran1]

Literal question: How important do you think it is that the Supreme Court of Norway has a composition of justices that reflects Norway geographically?
Question owner: Gunnar Grendstad (UiB); Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB); Jon Kåre Skiple (NORCE); Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE); Ingvild Misje (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1dommere3;p4k1dommere3;r19k1dommere3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1dommere3_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 143 12.4% 0.12413194
2 Important 347 30.1% 0.30121528
3 Somewhat important 339 29.4% 0.29427083
4 Not very important 214 18.6% 0.18576389
5 Not important at all 54 4.7% 0.04687500
97 Not answered 55 4.8% 0.04774306
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1udidir1_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1udidir1.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1udidir1_ran1;p4k1udidir1_ran1;r19k1udidir1_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1udidir1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1103] [Invalid:1176] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The new director has several years of experience in the field of immigration. Hansen has extensive political experience and has recently been a state secretary (deputy minister) in the Ministry of Justice and Public Security. 281 25.5% 0.2547597
2 The new director does not have experience in the field of immigration. Hansen has extensive political experience and has recently been a state secretary (deputy minister) in the Ministry of Transport. 265 24.0% 0.2402539
3 The new director has several years of experience in the field of immigration. Hansen arrives after leaving his position as Director General (administrative deputy) in the Ministry of Justice and Public Security. He has also held several other positions in central administration. 294 26.7% 0.2665458
4 The new director does not have experience in the field of immigration. Hansen arrives after leaving his position as Director General (administrative deputy) in the Ministry of Transport. He has also held several other positions in central administration. 263 23.8% 0.2384406
Sysmiss 1176 NA


f1k1udidir1


Variable label: How well qualified is Jan Hansen regarding the position of director at the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration?
Pre-question text: Imagine a case where a person, Jan Hansen, is employed as the new director of the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI). The Norwegian Directorate of Immigration is governed by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security and implements the Government’s refugee and immigration policies. [k1udidir1_ran1]
Literal question: How well qualified do you think Jan Hansen is regarding the position of director at the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration?
Question owner: Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1udidir1;r19k1udidir1;j1k1udidir1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 1]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1udidir1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well qualified 81 7.0% 0.07031250
2 Well qualified 316 27.4% 0.27430556
3 Somewhat qualified 206 17.9% 0.17881944
4 Neither well nor poorly qualified 194 16.8% 0.16840278
5 Somewhat poorly qualified 146 12.7% 0.12673611
6 Poorly qualified 114 9.9% 0.09895833
7 Very poorly qualified 33 2.9% 0.02864583
97 Not answered 62 5.4% 0.05381944
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1udidir2


Variable label: What advice do you think UDI’s Director Hansen will give the minister on how the case should be handled politically?
Pre-question text: Imagine a case emerging where government policy is clearly in violation of a recommendation set out by experts from the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration. The Minister of Justice and Public Security is aware of the professional recommendation, but still asks UDI’s Director Jan Hansen for advice on how the case should be handled politically.
Literal question: What advice do you think Hansen will give the minister?
Question owner: Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1udidir2;p4k1udidir2;r19k1udidir2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To fully follow the professional recommendation 156 13.5% 0.13541667
2 To follow the professional recommendation to a large extent 486 42.2% 0.42187500
3 To follow the professional recommendation to some extent 165 14.3% 0.14322917
4 Follow both in equal measures 68 5.9% 0.05902778
5 To follow the Government’s original policy to some extent 82 7.1% 0.07118056
6 To follow the Government’s original policy to a large extent 95 8.2% 0.08246528
7 To fully follow the Government’s original policy 20 1.7% 0.01736111
97 Not answered 80 6.9% 0.06944444
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1udidir3


Variable label: How do you think UDI’s Director Hansen will resolve this case practically?
Pre-question text: The Minister of Justice and Public Security decides to disregard the professional recommendation. As Director of UDI, Jan Hansen can still influence how the case is practically resolved.  
Literal question: How do you think Hansen will resolve this case?
Post-question: He will…:
Question owner: Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1udidir3;p4k1udidir3;r19k1udidir3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Fully follow the professional recommendation 28 2.4% 0.02430556
2 Follow the professional recommendation to a large extent 125 10.9% 0.10850694
3 Follow the professional recommendation to some extent 119 10.3% 0.10329861
4 Follow the professional recommendation and the political decision in equal measures 158 13.7% 0.13715278
5 Follow government policy to some extent 125 10.9% 0.10850694
6 Follow government policy to a large extent 327 28.4% 0.28385417
7 Fully follow government policy 180 15.6% 0.15625000
97 Not answered 90 7.8% 0.07812500
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1udidir4


Variable label: How UDI’s Director Hansen will manage the new government’s less restrictive refugee and immigration policy
Pre-question text: Imagine that there is a change of government and the new government has a new, less restrictive refugee and immigration policy.  
Literal question: How do you think Hansen as UDI’s Director will manage the new government policy?
Post-question: He will…
Question owner: Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1udidir4;p4k1udidir4;r19k1udidir4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Fully implement the new government policy 307 26.6% 0.266493056
2 Implement the new government policy to a large extent 435 37.8% 0.377604167
3 Implement the new government policy to some extent 129 11.2% 0.111979167
4 Try to find solutions that are halfway between the new government policy and the old, more restrictive policy 137 11.9% 0.118923611
5 Retain the old, restrictive policy to some extent 29 2.5% 0.025173611
6 Retain the old, restrictive policy to a large extent 19 1.6% 0.016493056
7 Fully retain the old, restrictive policy 3 0.3% 0.002604167
97 Not answered 93 8.1% 0.080729167
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1demtech1_1


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Public sector bureaucrats
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Public sector bureaucrats
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1demtech1_1;p4k1demtech1_1;r19k1demtech1_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 296 25.7% 0.256944444
2 To a large extent 632 54.9% 0.548611111
3 To some extent 116 10.1% 0.100694444
4 To a small extent 24 2.1% 0.020833333
5 Not at all 7 0.6% 0.006076389
97 Not answered 77 6.7% 0.066840278
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1demtech1_2


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Teachers
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Teachers
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1demtech1_2;p4k1demtech1_2;r19k1demtech1_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 173 15.0% 0.150173611
2 To a large extent 555 48.2% 0.481770833
3 To some extent 282 24.5% 0.244791667
4 To a small extent 60 5.2% 0.052083333
5 Not at all 7 0.6% 0.006076389
97 Not answered 75 6.5% 0.065104167
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1demtech1_3


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Journalists
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Journalists
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1demtech1_3;p4k1demtech1_3;r19k1demtech1_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 61 5.3% 0.05295139
2 To a large extent 275 23.9% 0.23871528
3 To some extent 454 39.4% 0.39409722
4 To a small extent 232 20.1% 0.20138889
5 Not at all 53 4.6% 0.04600694
97 Not answered 77 6.7% 0.06684028
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1demtech1_4


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Researchers
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Researchers
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1demtech1_4;p4k1demtech1_4;r19k1demtech1_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 239 20.7% 0.207465278
2 To a large extent 550 47.7% 0.477430556
3 To some extent 226 19.6% 0.196180556
4 To a small extent 56 4.9% 0.048611111
5 Not at all 7 0.6% 0.006076389
97 Not answered 74 6.4% 0.064236111
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1demtech1_5


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Judges
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Judges
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1demtech1_5;p4k1demtech1_5;r19k1demtech1_5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 418 36.3% 0.362847222
2 To a large extent 528 45.8% 0.458333333
3 To some extent 107 9.3% 0.092881944
4 To a small extent 22 1.9% 0.019097222
5 Not at all 5 0.4% 0.004340278
97 Not answered 72 6.2% 0.062500000
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1demtech2_1


Variable label: Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Crisis management
Pre-question text: The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence. Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
Literal question: Crisis management
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1demtech2_1;p4k1demtech2_1;r19k1demtech2_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Politicians should have full influence over the issue 15 1.3% 0.01302083
2 Politicians should have much more influence than experts 57 4.9% 0.04947917
3 Politicians should have more influence than experts 236 20.5% 0.20486111
4 Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence 243 21.1% 0.21093750
5 Experts should have more influence than politicians 278 24.1% 0.24131944
6 Experts should have much more influence than politicians 195 16.9% 0.16927083
7 Experts should have full influence over the issue 42 3.6% 0.03645833
97 Not answered 86 7.5% 0.07465278
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1demtech2_2


Variable label: Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Finance
Pre-question text: The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence. Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
Literal question: Finance
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1demtech2_2;p4k1demtech2_2;r19k1demtech2_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Politicians should have full influence over the issue 20 1.7% 0.01736111
2 Politicians should have much more influence than experts 129 11.2% 0.11197917
3 Politicians should have more influence than experts 314 27.3% 0.27256944
4 Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence 267 23.2% 0.23177083
5 Experts should have more influence than politicians 232 20.1% 0.20138889
6 Experts should have much more influence than politicians 90 7.8% 0.07812500
7 Experts should have full influence over the issue 12 1.0% 0.01041667
97 Not answered 88 7.6% 0.07638889
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1demtech2_3


Variable label: Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Immigration
Pre-question text: The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence. Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
Literal question: Immigration
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1demtech2_3;p4k1demtech2_3;r19k1demtech2_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Politicians should have full influence over the issue 35 3.0% 0.03038194
2 Politicians should have much more influence than experts 169 14.7% 0.14670139
3 Politicians should have more influence than experts 333 28.9% 0.28906250
4 Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence 297 25.8% 0.25781250
5 Experts should have more influence than politicians 149 12.9% 0.12934028
6 Experts should have much more influence than politicians 67 5.8% 0.05815972
7 Experts should have full influence over the issue 15 1.3% 0.01302083
97 Not answered 87 7.6% 0.07552083
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1demtech2_4


Variable label: Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Criminal policy
Pre-question text: The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence. Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
Literal question: Criminal policy
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1demtech2_4;p4k1demtech2_4;r19k1demtech2_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Politicians should have full influence over the issue 26 2.3% 0.02256944
2 Politicians should have much more influence than experts 138 12.0% 0.11979167
3 Politicians should have more influence than experts 278 24.1% 0.24131944
4 Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence 237 20.6% 0.20572917
5 Experts should have more influence than politicians 225 19.5% 0.19531250
6 Experts should have much more influence than politicians 140 12.2% 0.12152778
7 Experts should have full influence over the issue 20 1.7% 0.01736111
97 Not answered 88 7.6% 0.07638889
98 Not asked 1127 NA


f1k1kj112


Variable label: Gross annual income
Literal question: What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1kj112;p4k1kj112;r19k1kj112
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Less than 150 000 2 0.2% 0.001774623
2 150 001 – 300 000 7 0.6% 0.006211180
3 300 001 – 400 000 2 0.2% 0.001774623
4 400 001 – 500 000 33 2.9% 0.029281278
5 500 001 – 600 000 204 18.1% 0.181011535
6 600 001 – 700 000 295 26.2% 0.261756877
7 700 001 – 800 000 230 20.4% 0.204081633
8 800 001 – 900 000 145 12.9% 0.128660160
9 900 001 – 1 000 000 85 7.5% 0.075421473
10 1 000 001 – 1 100 000 62 5.5% 0.055013310
11 More than 1 100 000 54 4.8% 0.047914818
97 Not answered 8 0.7% 0.007098492
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1sentral1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Central authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway
Pre-question text:

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

Literal question: Central authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1sentral1;p4k1sentral1;r19k1sentral1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 55 4.9% 0.048802130
2 Agree 113 10.0% 0.100266193
3 Somewhat agree 269 23.9% 0.238686779
4 Neither agree nor disagree 210 18.6% 0.186335404
5 Somewhat disagree 160 14.2% 0.141969831
6 Disagree 253 22.4% 0.224489796
7 Strongly disagree 61 5.4% 0.054125998
97 Not answered 6 0.5% 0.005323869
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1sentral2


Variable label: Where do you think it is best for children to grow up? 
Literal question: Where do you think it is best for children to grow up? 
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1sentral2;p4k1sentral2;r19k1sentral2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A big city 49 4.3% 0.043478261
2 A suburb or the outskirts of a big city 174 15.4% 0.154392192
3 A small or medium-sized city 285 25.3% 0.252883762
4 A village 85 7.5% 0.075421473
5 A sparsely populated area 22 2.0% 0.019520852
6 It does not matter 506 44.9% 0.448979592
97 Not answered 6 0.5% 0.005323869
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1sentral3_ran1


Variable label: [Randomly selects f1k1sentral3a or f1k1sentral3b.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1sentral3_ran1;p4k1sentral3_ran1;r19k1sentral3_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Randomly selects f1k1sentral3a or f1k1sentral3b.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1127] [Invalid:1152] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selects k1sentral3a 566 50.2% 0.5022183
2 Selects k1sentral3b 561 49.8% 0.4977817
Sysmiss 1152 NA


f1k1sentral3a


Variable label: What do you agree with the most: Public institutions should be A) larger/fewer or B) smaller/several
Pre-question text: Generally speaking, which of the following statements do you agree with the most:
Literal question:

A: There should be larger and fewer public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts.

B: There should be smaller and more public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1sentral3a;p4k1sentral3a;r19k1sentral3a
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 2 & f1k1sentral3_ran1 = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree with A 34 6.0% 0.060070671
2 Agree much more with A 53 9.4% 0.093639576
3 Agree somewhat more with A 179 31.6% 0.316254417
4 Equally agree with A and B 92 16.3% 0.162544170
5 Agree somewhat more with B 135 23.9% 0.238515901
6 Agree much more with B 52 9.2% 0.091872792
7 Completely agree with B 18 3.2% 0.031802120
97 Not answered 3 0.5% 0.005300353
98 Not asked 1713 NA


f1k1sentral3b


Variable label: What do you agree with the most: Public institutions should be A) smaller/several or B) larger/fewer
Pre-question text: Generally speaking, which of the following statements do you agree with the most:
Literal question:

A: There should be smaller and more public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts.

B: There should be larger and fewer public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1sentral3b;p4k1sentral3b;r19k1sentral3b
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 2 & f1k1sentral3_ran1 = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree with A 40 7.1% 0.071301248
2 Agree much more with A 48 8.6% 0.085561497
3 Agree somewhat more with A 140 25.0% 0.249554367
4 Equally agree with A and B 97 17.3% 0.172905526
5 Agree somewhat more with B 142 25.3% 0.253119430
6 Agree much more with B 67 11.9% 0.119429590
7 Completely agree with B 25 4.5% 0.044563280
97 Not answered 2 0.4% 0.003565062
98 Not asked 1718 NA


f1k1ulikhet1_1


Variable label: To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Hard work
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
Literal question: Hard work
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ulikhet1_1;p4k1ulikhet1_1;r19k1ulikhet1_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 450 39.9% 0.399290151
2 Agree 456 40.5% 0.404614020
3 Somewhat agree 138 12.2% 0.122448980
4 Neither agree nor disagree 54 4.8% 0.047914818
5 Somewhat disagree 11 1.0% 0.009760426
6 Disagree 8 0.7% 0.007098492
7 Strongly disagree 3 0.3% 0.002661934
97 Not answered 7 0.6% 0.006211180
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ulikhet1_2


Variable label: To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Luck
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
Literal question: Luck
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ulikhet1_2;p4k1ulikhet1_2;r19k1ulikhet1_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 95 8.4% 0.08429459
2 Agree 192 17.0% 0.17036380
3 Somewhat agree 180 16.0% 0.15971606
4 Neither agree nor disagree 353 31.3% 0.31322094
5 Somewhat disagree 98 8.7% 0.08695652
6 Disagree 107 9.5% 0.09494232
7 Strongly disagree 80 7.1% 0.07098492
97 Not answered 22 2.0% 0.01952085
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ulikhet1_3


Variable label: To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Talent
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
Literal question: Talent
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ulikhet1_3;p4k1ulikhet1_3;r19k1ulikhet1_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 256 22.7% 0.227151730
2 Agree 486 43.1% 0.431233363
3 Somewhat agree 225 20.0% 0.199645075
4 Neither agree nor disagree 99 8.8% 0.087843833
5 Somewhat disagree 28 2.5% 0.024844720
6 Disagree 11 1.0% 0.009760426
7 Strongly disagree 7 0.6% 0.006211180
97 Not answered 15 1.3% 0.013309672
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ulikhet1_4


Variable label: To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Family
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
Literal question: Family
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ulikhet1_4;p4k1ulikhet1_4;r19k1ulikhet1_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 100 8.9% 0.08873114
2 Agree 205 18.2% 0.18189885
3 Somewhat agree 197 17.5% 0.17480035
4 Neither agree nor disagree 228 20.2% 0.20230701
5 Somewhat disagree 169 15.0% 0.14995563
6 Disagree 126 11.2% 0.11180124
7 Strongly disagree 83 7.4% 0.07364685
97 Not answered 19 1.7% 0.01685892
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ulikhet2_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1ulikhet2.]
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ulikhet2_ran1;p4k1ulikhet2_ran1;r19k1ulikhet2_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1ulikhet2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1127] [Invalid:1152] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 396 35.1% 0.3513753
2 In Norway, the richest 10 percent of households own half of Norway’s private wealth. 386 34.3% 0.3425022
3 In Norway today, the poorest 50 percent of households own 5 percent of Norway’s private wealth. 345 30.6% 0.3061224
Sysmiss 1152 NA


f1k1ulikhet2_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1ulikhet2.]
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ulikhet2_ran2;p4k1ulikhet2_ran2;r19k1ulikhet2_ran2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1ulikhet2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1127] [Invalid:1152] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 unequal political influence and power 277 24.6% 0.2457853
2 unequal life opportunities 281 24.9% 0.2493345
3 increased crime 292 25.9% 0.2590949
4 greater economic differences between men and women 277 24.6% 0.2457853
Sysmiss 1152 NA


f1k1ulikhet2_ran3


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1ulikhet2.]
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ulikhet2_ran3;p4k1ulikhet2_ran3;r19k1ulikhet2_ran3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1ulikhet2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1127] [Invalid:1152] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Reintroducing inheritance tax 287 25.5% 0.2546584
2 Increasing wealth tax 283 25.1% 0.2511091
3 Raising taxes on very high incomes 286 25.4% 0.2537711
4 State capital transfers of approximately NOK 1 million to all Norwegian citizens when they turn 27 years old 271 24.0% 0.2404614
Sysmiss 1152 NA


f1k1ulikhet2


Variable label: Your opinion on political propsal aimed at reducing wealth inequality
Pre-question text:

We would like to know your opinion on a political proposal aimed at reducing wealth inequality. [k1ulikhet2_ran1] Although wealth inequality may be fair for various reasons, it may lead to [k1ulikhet2_ran2].

[k1ulikhet2_ran3] may reduce wealth inequality.
Literal question: To what extent would you oppose or support such a proposal?
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1ulikhet2;j1k1ulikhet2;r19k1ulikhet2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1ulikhet2_ran1-f1k1ulikhet2_ran3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very strongly oppose 77 6.8% 0.068322981
2 Strongly oppose 127 11.3% 0.112688554
3 Somewhat oppose 165 14.6% 0.146406389
4 Neither oppose nor support 136 12.1% 0.120674357
5 Somewhat support 292 25.9% 0.259094942
6 Support strongly 209 18.5% 0.185448092
7 Very strongly support 110 9.8% 0.097604259
97 Not answered 11 1.0% 0.009760426
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1miljo2


Variable label: Overall, what do you think about the efforts being made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Norway?
Pre-question text: Norway has set itself the objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to prevent harmful climate change. In order to achieve the objective of reducing emissions, a number of measures have been initiated.
Literal question: Overall, what do you think about the efforts being made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Norway?
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1miljo2;p4k1miljo2;r19k1miljo2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Random direction]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The efforts are too small 702 62.3% 0.622892635
2 The efforts are appropriate 364 32.3% 0.322981366
3 The efforts are too great 50 4.4% 0.044365572
97 Not answered 11 1.0% 0.009760426
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1miljo3


Variable label: What do you think about the technology used to limit climate change?
Pre-question text: One of the measures that Norway has worked on to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is the capture and storage of CO2 (carbon dioxide). On a large scale, the technology can play an important role in limiting climate change.
Literal question: What do you think about this technology?
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1miljo3;p4k1miljo3;r19k1miljo3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Random direction]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very negative 26 2.3% 0.02307010
2 Slightly negative 67 5.9% 0.05944987
3 Slightly positive 365 32.4% 0.32386868
4 Very positive 457 40.6% 0.40550133
5 No opinion / do not know 198 17.6% 0.17568767
97 Not answered 14 1.2% 0.01242236
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1poladm_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1poladm.]
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1poladm_ran
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1poladm.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1120] [Invalid:1159] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 One alternative appears to be by far the best in a professional sense, but it is an alternative the political leadership does not want. 570 50.9% 0.5089286
2 Although there is considerable professional disagreement, one alternative appears to be the best in a professional sense, but it is an alternative the political leadership does not want. 550 49.1% 0.4910714
Sysmiss 1159 NA


f1k1poladm


Variable label: What the administration should do when their proposal is unlikely to be adopted
Pre-question text:

Imagine that the political leadership has asked the administration to study and promote a proposed resolution in a difficult case related to the development and financing of roads. The case involves a number of aspects (natural areas, pollution, road tolls) about which there is considerable political conflict. The study is based on expertise from internal administration and from external experts (researchers). [k1poladm_ran]

It is unlikely that the proposal will be adopted.
Literal question: What do you think is the most correct thing for the administration to do in such a situation?
Post-question: You may only tick one of the alternatives.
Question owner: Dag Ingvar Jacobsen (UiA)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1poladm
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1poladm_ran.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Promote the alternative which the professional expertise believes is the best in a professional sense. 493 43.7% 0.43744454
3 Discuss the case with the political leadership to see if it is possible to approve the case if minor changes are made. 603 53.5% 0.53504880
4 Promote the alternative that is most likely to be politically adopted. 7 0.6% 0.00621118
97 Not answered 24 2.1% 0.02129547
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ansvar1_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1ansvar1_1.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ansvar1_ran1;p4k1ansvar1_ran1;r19k1ansvar1_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1ansvar1_1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1114] [Invalid:1165] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 534 47.9% 0.4793537
2 Primary and lower secondary school results are very important for many people, and they have been shown to play a significant role regarding which political party people vote for. 580 52.1% 0.5206463
Sysmiss 1165 NA


f1k1ansvar1_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1ansvar1_1.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ansvar1_ran2;p4k1ansvar1_ran2;r19k1ansvar1_ran2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1ansvar1_1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1114] [Invalid:1165] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 better 548 49.2% 0.491921
2 worse 566 50.8% 0.508079
Sysmiss 1165 NA


f1k1ansvar1_1


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Committed headteachers/school staff
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Committed headteachers and school staff.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1ansvar1_1;r19k1ansvar1_1;j1k1ansvar1_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1ansvar1_ran1 and f1k1ansvar1_ran2. Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar2 and f1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 207 18.4% 0.18367347
1 Selected 884 78.4% 0.78438332
97 Not answered 36 3.2% 0.03194321
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ansvar1_2


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Parents who take responsibility
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Parents who take responsibility for their children’s education.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1ansvar1_2;r19k1ansvar1_2;j1k1ansvar1_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar2 and f1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 466 41.3% 0.41348713
1 Selected 625 55.5% 0.55456965
97 Not answered 36 3.2% 0.03194321
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ansvar1_3


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Commitment among the parties in power/the mayor’s political party
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran]] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Commitment to educational policy among the parties in power / the mayor’s political party.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1ansvar1_3;r19k1ansvar1_3;j1k1ansvar1_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar2 and f1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 699 62.0% 0.62023070
1 Selected 392 34.8% 0.34782609
97 Not answered 36 3.2% 0.03194321
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ansvar1_4


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Commitment among the opposition
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Commitment to educational policy among the opposition / municipal councillors who are not members of the mayor’s political party.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1ansvar1_4;r19k1ansvar1_4;j1k1ansvar1_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar2 and f1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 895 79.4% 0.79414374
1 Selected 196 17.4% 0.17391304
97 Not answered 36 3.2% 0.03194321
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ansvar1_5


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Policies and funding from the County Authority/Government
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Policies and funding from the County Authority/Government.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1ansvar1_5;r19k1ansvar1_5;j1k1ansvar1_5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar2 and f1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 645 57.2% 0.57231588
1 Selected 446 39.6% 0.39574091
97 Not answered 36 3.2% 0.03194321
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ansvar2_1


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: Headteachers and school staff
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Headteachers and school staff
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ansvar2_1;p4k1ansvar2_1;r19k1ansvar2_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 601 53.3% 0.5332742
2 2 267 23.7% 0.2369122
3 3 116 10.3% 0.1029281
97 Not answered 143 12.7% 0.1268855
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ansvar2_2


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: Public sector employees/municipal administration
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Public sector employees / municipal administration
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ansvar2_2;p4k1ansvar2_2;r19k1ansvar2_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 48 4.3% 0.04259095
2 2 138 12.2% 0.12244898
3 3 224 19.9% 0.19875776
97 Not answered 717 63.6% 0.63620231
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ansvar2_3


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: Parents
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Parents
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ansvar2_3;p4k1ansvar2_3;r19k1ansvar2_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 144 12.8% 0.1277728
2 2 344 30.5% 0.3052351
3 3 175 15.5% 0.1552795
97 Not answered 464 41.2% 0.4117125
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ansvar2_4


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: The parties in power/The mayor’s political party
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: The parties in power/ The mayor’s political party
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ansvar2_4;p4k1ansvar2_4;r19k1ansvar2_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 92 8.2% 0.08163265
2 2 162 14.4% 0.14374445
3 3 195 17.3% 0.17302573
97 Not answered 678 60.2% 0.60159716
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ansvar2_5


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: The opposition/Municipal councillors who are not members of the mayor’s political party
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: The opposition / Municipal councillors who are not members of the mayor’s political party
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ansvar2_5;p4k1ansvar2_5;r19k1ansvar2_5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 3 0.3% 0.002661934
2 2 23 2.0% 0.020408163
3 3 40 3.5% 0.035492458
97 Not answered 1061 94.1% 0.941437445
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ansvar2_6


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: The county authority/ National government
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: The county authority/ National government
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ansvar2_6;p4k1ansvar2_6;r19k1ansvar2_6
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 163 14.5% 0.14463177
2 2 97 8.6% 0.08606921
3 3 242 21.5% 0.21472937
97 Not answered 625 55.5% 0.55456965
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ansvar3


Variable label: Whether new results for schools would have affected the voter turnout for the mayor’s political party
Literal question: Do you think these new results for primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality would have affected the voter turnout for the mayor’s political party at the next local election?
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ansvar3;p4k1ansvar3;r19k1ansvar3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly unlikely 44 3.9% 0.03904170
2 Quite unlikely 115 10.2% 0.10204082
3 Unlikely 167 14.8% 0.14818101
4 Neutral 323 28.7% 0.28660160
5 Likely 323 28.7% 0.28660160
6 Quite likely 81 7.2% 0.07187223
7 Highly likely 7 0.6% 0.00621118
97 Not answered 67 5.9% 0.05944987
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1mi1_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi1_1 and f1k1mi1_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi1_ran1;p4k1mi1_ran1;r19k1mi1_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi1_1 and f1k1mi1_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Islamic values 542 49.8% 0.4977043
2 conservative notions about the position of women in Islam 547 50.2% 0.5022957
Sysmiss 1190 NA


f1k1mi1_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi1_1 and f1k1mi1_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi1_ran2;p4k1mi1_ran2;r19k1mi1_ran2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi1_1 and f1k1mi1_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 k1mi1_1 516 47.4% 0.4738292
2 k1mi1_2 573 52.6% 0.5261708
Sysmiss 1190 NA


f1k1mi1_1


Variable label: Should Norwegian Muslims be allowed to hold an event to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in Islam]?
Pre-question text: Some Norwegian Muslims have asked for permission to hold a public event in order to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in Islam].
Literal question: Do you think they should be allowed to hold such an event?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi1_1;p4k1mi1_1;r19k1mi1_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if k1mi1_ran2 = 1 & f1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1mi1_ran1 and f1k1mi1_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 405 78.5% 0.78488372
2 No 104 20.2% 0.20155039
97 Not answered 7 1.4% 0.01356589
98 Not asked 1763 NA


f1k1mi1_2


Variable label: Does a majority/minority in Norway that muslims should be allowed to hold an event to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in Islam]?
Pre-question text: Some Norwegian Muslims have asked for permission to hold a public event in order to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in Islam]. What is your assessment:
Literal question: Is there a majority or a minority in Norway who thinks that they should be allowed to hold such an event?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi1_2;p4k1mi1_2;r19k1mi1_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if k1mi1_ran2 = 2 & f1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1mi1_ran1 and f1k1mi1_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A majortiy 276 48.2% 0.48167539
2 A minority 286 49.9% 0.49912740
97 Not answered 11 1.9% 0.01919721
98 Not asked 1706 NA


f1k1mi2_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi2_1 and f1k1mi2_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi2_ran1;p4k1mi2_ran1;r19k1mi2_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi2_1 and f1k1mi2_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 be publicly recognised 560 51.4% 0.5142332
2 receive support from the state 529 48.6% 0.4857668
Sysmiss 1190 NA


f1k1mi2_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi2_1 and f1k1mi2_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi2_ran2;p4k1mi2_ran2;r19k1mi2_ran2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi2_1 and f1k1mi2_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 k1mi2_1 534 49.0% 0.4903581
2 k1mi2_2 555 51.0% 0.5096419
Sysmiss 1190 NA


f1k1mi2_1


Variable label: Do you think that Muslim traditions should [be publicly recognised/receive support from the state] in this country?
Literal question: Do you think that Muslim traditions and cultures should [be publicly recognised/receive support from the state] in this country?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi2_1;p4k1mi2_1;r19k1mi2_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if k1mi2_ran2 = 1 & f1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1mi2_ran1 og f1k1mi2_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 372 69.7% 0.69662921
2 No 146 27.3% 0.27340824
97 Not answered 16 3.0% 0.02996255
98 Not asked 1745 NA


f1k1mi2_2


Variable label: Does a majority/minority think that Muslim traditions should [be publicly recognised/receive support from the state]in this country?
Pre-question text: What is your assessment:
Literal question: Is there a majority or a minority in Norway who thinks that Muslim traditions and cultures should [be publicly recognised/receive support from the state]in this country?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi2_2;p4k1mi2_2;r19k1mi2_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if k1mi2_ran2 = 2 & f1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1mi2_ran1 og f1k1mi2_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A majortiy 293 52.8% 0.52792793
2 A minority 250 45.0% 0.45045045
97 Not answered 12 2.2% 0.02162162
98 Not asked 1724 NA


f1k1mi3_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi3_1 and f1k1mi3_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi3_ran1;p4k1mi3_ran1;r19k1mi3_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi3_1 and f1k1mi3_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Muslim local politicians 532 48.9% 0.4885216
2 Muslim religious leaders 557 51.1% 0.5114784
Sysmiss 1190 NA


f1k1mi3_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi3_1 and f1k1mi3_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi3_ran2;p4k1mi3_ran2;r19k1mi3_ran2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi3_1 and f1k1mi3_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 k1mi3_1 568 52.2% 0.5215794
2 k1mi3_2 521 47.8% 0.4784206
Sysmiss 1190 NA


f1k1mi3_1


Variable label: Trust/distrust Muslim [local politicians/religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
Literal question: Do you trust or distrust [Muslim local politicians/Muslim religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi3_1;p4k1mi3_1;r19k1mi3_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if k1mi3_ran2 = 1 & f1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1mi3_ran1 and f1k1mi3_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Trust 445 78.3% 0.78345070
2 Distrust 108 19.0% 0.19014085
97 Not answered 15 2.6% 0.02640845
98 Not asked 1711 NA


f1k1mi3_2


Variable label: Does majority/minority trust/distrust [Muslim local politicians/Muslim religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
Pre-question text: What is your assessment:
Literal question: Does the majority in Norway trust or distrust [Muslim local politicians/Muslim religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi3_2;p4k1mi3_2;r19k1mi3_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if k1mi3_ran2 = 2 & f1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1mi3_ran1 and f1k1mi3_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The majority trusts 343 65.8% 0.6583493
2 The majority distrusts 171 32.8% 0.3282150
97 Not answered 7 1.3% 0.0134357
98 Not asked 1758 NA


f1k1mi4_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi4_1 and f1k1mi4_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi4_ran1;p4k1mi4_ran1;r19k1mi4_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi4_1 and f1k1mi4_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 reflect 552 50.7% 0.5068871
2 place less emphasis on 537 49.3% 0.4931129
Sysmiss 1190 NA


f1k1mi4_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi4_1 and f1k1mi4_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi4_ran2;p4k1mi4_ran2;r19k1mi4_ran2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if f1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in f1k1mi4_1 and f1k1mi4_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 k1mi4_1 534 49.0% 0.4903581
2 k1mi4_2 555 51.0% 0.5096419
Sysmiss 1190 NA


f1k1mi4_1


Variable label: Should school textbooks [reflect/place less emphasis on] the religious/cultural diversity in Norway?
Literal question: Do you think primary and lower secondary school textbooks should be written so that they [reflect/place less emphasis on] the religious and cultural diversity in Norway?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi4_1;p4k1mi4_1;r19k1mi4_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if k1mi4_ran2 = 1 & f1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1mi4_ran1 and f1k1mi4_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 289 54.1% 0.54119850
2 No 236 44.2% 0.44194757
97 Not answered 9 1.7% 0.01685393
98 Not asked 1745 NA


f1k1mi4_2


Variable label: Does a majority/minority think that school textbooks should [reflect/place less emphasis on] religious/cultural diversity?
Pre-question text: What is your assessment:
Literal question: Is there a majority or a minority in Norway who thinks that primary and lower secondary school textbooks should be written so that they [reflect/place less emphasis on] the religious and cultural diversity in Norway?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi4_2;p4k1mi4_2;r19k1mi4_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if k1mi4_ran2 = 2 & f1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in f1k1mi4_ran1 and f1k1mi4_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A majortiy 293 52.8% 0.52792793
2 A minority 251 45.2% 0.45225225
97 Not answered 11 2.0% 0.01981982
98 Not asked 1724 NA


f1k1imcp_1


Variable label: Describes you how well: Important for me to be unprejudiced towards immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced towards immigrants.
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1imcp_1;p4k1imcp_1;r19k1imcp_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 411 36.5% 0.364685004
2 Good 438 38.9% 0.388642413
3 Somewhat well 117 10.4% 0.103815439
4 Neither well nor poorly 76 6.7% 0.067435670
5 Somewhat poorly 16 1.4% 0.014196983
6 Poorly 9 0.8% 0.007985803
7 Very poorly 4 0.4% 0.003549246
97 Not answered 56 5.0% 0.049689441
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1imcp_2


Variable label: Describes you how well: Don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself.
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1imcp_2;p4k1imcp_2;r19k1imcp_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 399 35.4% 0.35403727
2 Good 366 32.5% 0.32475599
3 Somewhat well 117 10.4% 0.10381544
4 Neither well nor poorly 120 10.6% 0.10647737
5 Somewhat poorly 28 2.5% 0.02484472
6 Poorly 17 1.5% 0.01508429
7 Very poorly 16 1.4% 0.01419698
97 Not answered 64 5.7% 0.05678793
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1imcp_3


Variable label: Describes you how well: Feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1imcp_3;p4k1imcp_3;r19k1imcp_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 101 9.0% 0.08961846
2 Good 221 19.6% 0.19609583
3 Somewhat well 174 15.4% 0.15439219
4 Neither well nor poorly 284 25.2% 0.25199645
5 Somewhat poorly 97 8.6% 0.08606921
6 Poorly 124 11.0% 0.11002662
7 Very poorly 65 5.8% 0.05767524
97 Not answered 61 5.4% 0.05412600
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1imcp_4


Variable label: Describes you how well: Try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of own convictions
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of my own convictions.
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1imcp_4;p4k1imcp_4;r19k1imcp_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 360 31.9% 0.319432121
2 Good 455 40.4% 0.403726708
3 Somewhat well 117 10.4% 0.103815439
4 Neither well nor poorly 105 9.3% 0.093167702
5 Somewhat poorly 11 1.0% 0.009760426
6 Poorly 12 1.1% 0.010647737
7 Very poorly 8 0.7% 0.007098492
97 Not answered 59 5.2% 0.052351375
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1miljo1_1


Variable label: Statement: People have the right to change the natural environment so that it satisfies their needs
Pre-question text: Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
Literal question: People have the right to change the natural environment so that it satisfies their needs
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1miljo1_1;p4k1miljo1_1;r19k1miljo1_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 17 1.5% 0.01508429
2 Agree 73 6.5% 0.06477374
3 Somewhat agree 255 22.6% 0.22626442
4 Do not agree that much 434 38.5% 0.38509317
5 Do not agree at all 284 25.2% 0.25199645
97 Not answered 64 5.7% 0.05678793
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1miljo1_2


Variable label: Statement: We must take environmental considerations into account, even if it reduces economic growth
Pre-question text: Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
Literal question: We must take environmental considerations into account, even if it reduces economic growth
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1miljo1_2;p4k1miljo1_2;r19k1miljo1_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 484 42.9% 0.429458740
2 Agree 397 35.2% 0.352262644
3 Somewhat agree 151 13.4% 0.133984028
4 Do not agree that much 30 2.7% 0.026619343
5 Do not agree at all 6 0.5% 0.005323869
97 Not answered 59 5.2% 0.052351375
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1miljo1_3


Variable label: Statement: Norwegian environmental policy needs the same kind of urgent response as shown in the coronavirus crisis
Pre-question text: Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
Literal question: Norwegian environmental policy needs to see the same kind of urgent response that was shown in relation to the coronavirus crisis
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1miljo1_3;p4k1miljo1_3;r19k1miljo1_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 331 29.4% 0.29370009
2 Agree 346 30.7% 0.30700976
3 Somewhat agree 246 21.8% 0.21827862
4 Do not agree that much 96 8.5% 0.08518190
5 Do not agree at all 47 4.2% 0.04170364
97 Not answered 61 5.4% 0.05412600
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1miljo1_4


Variable label: Statement: Technological innovations will solve climate problems
Pre-question text: Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
Literal question: Technological innovations will solve climate problems
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1miljo1_4;p4k1miljo1_4;r19k1miljo1_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if f1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 80 7.1% 0.07098492
2 Agree 238 21.1% 0.21118012
3 Somewhat agree 576 51.1% 0.51109139
4 Do not agree that much 136 12.1% 0.12067436
5 Do not agree at all 37 3.3% 0.03283052
97 Not answered 60 5.3% 0.05323869
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1ulikhet3


Variable label: The main reason why some people are poor in Norway
Literal question: The main reason why some people are poor in Norway is…
Post-question: Please select the reason that you think is most important.
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ulikhet3;p4k1ulikhet3;r19k1ulikhet3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 ... that some of them are generally lazy and work-shy 37 3.3% 0.03283052
2 ... that some of them are unfortunate 184 16.3% 0.16326531
3 ... that some of them come from an underprivileged family 541 48.0% 0.48003549
4 ... that some of them are underpaid 214 19.0% 0.18988465
5 ... that some of them lack innate abilities that are important in working life 79 7.0% 0.07009760
97 Not answered 72 6.4% 0.06388642
98 Not asked 1152 NA


f1k1kj3


Variable label: What is your highest completed education?
Literal question: What is your highest completed education?
Post-question: If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1kj3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2279] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No completed education 0 NaN
2 Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) 0 NaN
3 Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School, business college) 0 NaN
4 Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) 0 NaN
5 Craft training/shorter education programmes (e.g. vocational school, technical school/college, maritime vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot training, secretary school, home industry school/handicrafts school, master craftsman certificate training) 0 NaN
6 University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university college graduate 2 and 2½ years) 0 NaN
7 College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime subjects, military subjects etc.) 0 NaN
8 University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) 0 NaN
9 University college – 5-6 year education (MA, majors or longer vocational education on a university college level) 0 NaN
10 University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education (e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) 0 NaN
11 Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) 0 NaN
12 None of the above (please enter): 0 NaN
97 Not answered 0 NaN
Sysmiss 2279 NA


f1k1kj3_12_other


Variable label: Open: What is your highest completed education?
Pre-question text: What is your highest completed education?
Literal question: None of the above (please enter):
Post-question: If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1kj3_12_other
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2279] [Range:-]



f1k1kj3_recode


Variable label: What is your highest completed education? [recoded]
Literal question: What is your highest completed education?
Post-question: If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1kj3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations]

[Recoded from source variable: f1k1kj3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No education/elementary school 6 0.3% 0.002632734
2 Upper secondary education 119 5.2% 0.052215884
3 University/University college 2012 88.3% 0.882843352
97 Not answered 142 6.2% 0.062308030


f1k1kj3_recode_coded


Variable label: What is your highest completed education? [recoded] [coded]
Literal question: What is your highest completed education?
Post-question: If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1kj3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations]

[Recoded from source variable: f1k1kj3]

[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source variable f1k1kj3_recode]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No education/elementary school 6 0.3% 0.002632734
2 Upper secondary education 119 5.2% 0.052215884
3 University/University college 2020 88.6% 0.886353664
97 Not answered 134 5.9% 0.058797718


f1k1kj5


Variable label: Placement political left-right scale
Pre-question text: People often talk about right-wing economics and left-wing economics.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means left-wing in relation to economic issues and 10 means right-wing in relation to economic issues?
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1kj5;p4k1kj5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 Left wing 17 0.7% 0.007459412
1 1 62 2.7% 0.027204914
2 2 244 10.7% 0.107064502
3 3 425 18.6% 0.186485301
4 4 403 17.7% 0.176831944
5 5 372 16.3% 0.163229487
6 6 256 11.2% 0.112329969
7 7 215 9.4% 0.094339623
8 8 83 3.6% 0.036419482
9 9 18 0.8% 0.007898201
10 10 Right wing 11 0.5% 0.004826678
97 Not answered 173 7.6% 0.075910487


f1k1kj6


Variable label: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1kj6
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 23 1.0% 0.01009215
2 The Conservative Party 393 17.2% 0.17244405
3 The Progressive Party 31 1.4% 0.01360246
4 The Liberal Party 156 6.8% 0.06845108
5 The Socialist Left Party 266 11.7% 0.11671786
6 The Centre Party 129 5.7% 0.05660377
7 The Green Party 274 12.0% 0.12022817
8 The Labour Party 573 25.1% 0.25142606
9 The Red Party 68 3.0% 0.02983765
10 Would not vote 42 1.8% 0.01842914
11 Not entitled to vote 34 1.5% 0.01491882
12 Other: 94 4.1% 0.04124616
97 Not answered 196 8.6% 0.08600263


f1k1kj6_12_other


Variable label: Open: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Pre-question text: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Literal question: Other:
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1kj6_12_other
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2279] [Range:-]



f1k1kj6_coded


Variable label: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow? [coded]
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1kj6
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[Alle respondenter spurt]

[Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert]

[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source variable f1k1kj6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 23 1.0% 0.01009215
2 The Conservative Party 394 17.3% 0.17288284
3 The Progressive Party 31 1.4% 0.01360246
4 The Liberal Party 156 6.8% 0.06845108
5 The Socialist Left Party 266 11.7% 0.11671786
6 The Centre Party 130 5.7% 0.05704256
7 The Green Party 274 12.0% 0.12022817
8 The Labour Party 573 25.1% 0.25142606
9 The Red Party 68 3.0% 0.02983765
10 Would not vote 42 1.8% 0.01842914
11 Not entitled to vote 34 1.5% 0.01491882
12 Other: 92 4.0% 0.04036858
97 Not answered 196 8.6% 0.08600263


f1avslutt


Variable label: Open: Feedback about the survey
Literal question: Do you wish to provide feedback about the survey?
Post-question: If so, write below.
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2279] [Range:-]



f1P1


Variable label: Gender
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Male 1063 46.6% 0.46643265
2 Female 1175 51.6% 0.51557701
97 Not answered 41 1.8% 0.01799035


f1P2


Variable label: Region
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Oslo 857 37.6% 0.37604212
2 Østlandet 644 28.3% 0.28258008
3 Sørlandet 44 1.9% 0.01930671
4 Vestlandet 153 6.7% 0.06713471
5 Trøndelag 55 2.4% 0.02413339
6 Nord-Norge 64 2.8% 0.02808249
97 Not answered 462 20.3% 0.20272049


f1P3


Variable label: County
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:3-54]

Value Label Cases Percentage
3 Oslo 857 37.6% 0.376042124
11 Rogaland 54 2.4% 0.023694603
15 Møre og Romsdal 6 0.3% 0.002632734
18 Nordland 19 0.8% 0.008336990
30 Viken 510 22.4% 0.223782361
34 Innlandet 32 1.4% 0.014041246
38 Vestfold og Telemark 102 4.5% 0.044756472
42 Agder 44 1.9% 0.019306713
46 Vestland 93 4.1% 0.040807372
50 Trøndelag 55 2.4% 0.024133392
54 Troms og Finnmark 45 2.0% 0.019745502
97 Not answered 462 20.3% 0.202720491


f1P3_2


Variable label: Election district
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Akershus 420 18.4% 0.184291356
2 Oslo 857 37.6% 0.376042124
3 Østfold 55 2.4% 0.024133392
4 Vestfold 96 4.2% 0.042123738
5 Hedmark 19 0.8% 0.008336990
6 Oppland 13 0.6% 0.005704256
7 Buskerud 35 1.5% 0.015357613
8 Telemark 6 0.3% 0.002632734
9 Vest-Agder 20 0.9% 0.008775779
10 Aust-Agder 24 1.1% 0.010530935
11 Rogaland 54 2.4% 0.023694603
12 Hordaland 33 1.4% 0.014480035
13 Sogn og Fjordane 60 2.6% 0.026327337
14 Møre og Romsdal 6 0.3% 0.002632734
15 Nord-Trøndelag 9 0.4% 0.003949100
16 Sør-Trøndelag 46 2.0% 0.020184291
17 Nordland 19 0.8% 0.008336990
18 Troms 41 1.8% 0.017990347
19 Finnmark 4 0.2% 0.001755156
97 Not answered 462 20.3% 0.202720491


f1P3_3


Variable label: Region (trichotomy)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Oslo 857 37.6% 0.3760421
2 Eastern Norway 644 28.3% 0.2825801
3 The rest of the country 316 13.9% 0.1386573
97 Not answered 462 20.3% 0.2027205


f1P4_1


Variable label: Highest level of completed education (condensed)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical description: [Source variable: f1k1kj3]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No education/elementary school 6 0.3% 0.002632734
2 Upper secondary education 119 5.2% 0.052215884
3 University/University college 2012 88.3% 0.882843352
97 Not answered 142 6.2% 0.062308030


f1P5_1


Variable label: Year of birth (expanded)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1959 or earlier 339 14.9% 0.14874945
2 1960-1969 715 31.4% 0.31373409
3 1970-1979 608 26.7% 0.26678368
4 1980-1989 328 14.4% 0.14392277
5 1990 or later 141 6.2% 0.06186924
97 Not answered 148 6.5% 0.06494076


f1P5_2


Variable label: Year of birth (condensed)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1959 or earlier 339 14.9% 0.14874945
2 1960-1989 1651 72.4% 0.72444054
3 1990 or later 141 6.2% 0.06186924
97 Not answered 148 6.5% 0.06494076


f1P6


Variable label: Administrative level
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Ministry 1032 45.3% 0.452830189
2 Directorate 1237 54.3% 0.542781922
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.004387889


f1_tvcpa


Variable label: Currently a public administrator in the central government
Literal question: Certain respondents were after the field period and data delivery discovered as not fitting into the defined target population. That is, not working in public administration in the central government (ministries, directorates, and supervisory authorities). We therefore recommend excluding these respondents when conducting analyses. For more information on the exclusion process and -criteria, please refer to the documentation report.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not currently a public administrator in the central government 24 1.1% 0.01053093
1 Currently a public administrator in the central government 2255 98.9% 0.98946907