Citation
Researchers responsible
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Jacob Aars
|
UiB
|
|
Tobias Bach
|
UiO
|
|
Jarle Trondal
|
UiA
|
|
Pål Martinussen
|
NTNU
|
|
Tord Lindén
|
NORCE
|
|
Marte Winsvold
|
ISF
|
|
Troy Broderstad
|
UiT
|
|
Zuzana Murdoch
|
UiB
|
|
Benny Geys
|
BI
|
|
Ole Andreas Danielsen
|
Oslomet
|
Coordinating team
|
Name
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
|
Sina Storelv
|
|
Vemund Vestre
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Ola Grendal
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Georg Stokke
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators (NFP) is an internet-based
survey of public administrators. The study deals with matters that are
important to society, public administration and democracy. The panel is
initiated and run by researchers from the leading reseach universities
and institutions in Norway and is a non-profit project that aims to
serve research goals. The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators seeks
to contribute in a dialogue between research, politics and socitey.
The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators is part of the Digital
Social Science Core Facility (DIGSSCORE) at the University of Bergen
(UiB). The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators is also affiliated
with the Norwegian citizen Panel, the Norwegian Journalist Panel, and
the Panel of Elected Representatives. The University of Bergen is the
owner and treatment manager of the The Norwegian Panel of Public
Administrators. Ideas2Evidence executes the practical implementation of
the survey, and are responsible for recruting participants, as well as
sending and receiving surveys to and from respondents. The data is
stored encrypted and secure in UiB’s infrastructure for for safe
processing of sensitive personal data in research, ‘SAFE’. The panel has
been reported to and processed by the Data Protection Official for
Research at Sikt - Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and
Research. More information can be found at
uib.no/en/nfp.
Scope
Geographic coverage: National.
Unit of
analysis: Central government employees.
Universe: All employees of the central government.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
All employees of the central government - ministries, directorates and
supervisory authorities - are invited to participate in the Norwegian
Panel of Public Administrators. Contact information has been collected
through “Depkatalog” or the website of the individual directorate or
supervisory authority, or contact lists delivered by the individual
directorates or supervisory authorities.
As of this fourth wave of NFP, only employees of the central government
have been recruited. The long term goal is to recruit public
administrators from all levels of public administration.
Due to some over-coverage during the recruitment process, there are N =
37 respondents who have been excluded after the field period, as they
did not belong to the defined target population, that is, not working in
public administration in the central government (ministries,
directorates, and supervisory authorities). We therefore recommend
excluding these respondents when conducting analyses. This can be done
using the variable f4_tvcpa. For more information on the exclusion
process and exclusion criteria, please consult the documentation report.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on an online questionnaire where the panel members
are invited by email. Panel members were recuited to the panel in wave
1, 2 3, and 4.
For a more detailed description on recruitment of panel members, please
see the documentation report.
Wave 4 was fielded from 13th of November 2023 to the 5th of December
2023.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-101
|
2024-06-19
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 4
|
|
v-101
|
2024-06-07
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 4
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-05
|
f4_tvcpa
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-16
|
f4_piigix_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-16
|
f4_piigix_2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-16
|
f4_piigix_3
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-16
|
f4_piigix_4
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-16
|
f4_piigix_5
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-16
|
f4_piigix_ir_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-16
|
f4_piigfx_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_palev
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotmcx1_fageks1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotmcx1_fageks2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotmcx2_fageks1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotmcx2_fageks2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_pititx1_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_pititx1_2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_pititx1_3
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_pititx1_4
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_pititx1_5
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_pititx2_6
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_pititx2_7
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_pititx2_8
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_pititx2_9
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_pititx2_10
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_paale2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_paale2_999_other
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotfe_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotfe_2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotfe_3
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotfe_4
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotfe_5
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotfe_6
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_piigix_2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_piigax_ir_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotmcx1_arberf1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotmcx1_arberf2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotmcx2_arberf1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_wotmcx2_arberf2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-02-15
|
f4_mobil
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-100
|
2023-12-19
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 4
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
The Panel of Public Administrators - round 4 - v-101-L.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Privileged
|
|
# Cases
|
2206
|
|
# Variables
|
128
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f4_rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
The wave the respondent was recruited
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
The wave the respondent was recruited
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
955 |
43.3% |
0.4329102 |
| 2 |
Wave 2 |
267 |
12.1% |
0.1210335 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
831 |
37.7% |
0.3766999 |
| 4 |
Wave 4 |
153 |
6.9% |
0.0693563 |
f4_interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f4_interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:1934] [Invalid:272]
[Range:-]
|
f4_browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f4_browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f4_mobil
|
Variable label:
|
Determines if the respondents uses mobile device
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determines if the respondents uses mobile device
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
mobile device |
197 |
8.9% |
0.0893019 |
| 0 |
other |
2009 |
91.1% |
0.9106981 |
f4_opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f4_enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
Determines respondents device type
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determines respondents device type
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
2009 |
91.1% |
0.9106981 |
| 2 |
Touch |
197 |
8.9% |
0.0893019 |
| 3 |
Generic |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f4_advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f4_getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f4_paale
|
Variable label:
|
Where do you work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where do you work?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was not registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:2-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ministry |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 2 |
Directorate/supervisory authority/agency/other |
5 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2201 |
|
NA |
f4_paale1
|
Variable label:
|
Which ministry do you work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which ministry do you work for?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_paale = 1) & the respondent was not registered with
a value in f4_P6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2206]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 101 |
Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 102 |
Ministry of Children and Families |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 117 |
Ministry of Digitalisation and Public Governance |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 103 |
Ministry of Finance |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 104 |
Ministry of Defence |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 105 |
Ministry of Health and Care Services |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 106 |
Ministry of Justice and Public Security |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 107 |
Ministry of Climate and Environment |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 108 |
Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 109 |
Ministry of Culture and Equality |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 110 |
Ministry of Education and Research |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 111 |
Ministry of Agriculture and Food |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 112 |
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 113 |
Ministry of Petroleum and Energy |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 114 |
The Ministry of Transport |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 115 |
Ministry of Foreign Affairs |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 116 |
Office of the Prime Minister |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 999 |
My employer is not on the list |
0 |
|
NaN |
| Sysmiss |
|
2206 |
|
NA |
f4_paale1_999_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which ministry do you work in?: My employer is not on the list:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which ministry do you work for?
|
|
Literal question:
|
My employer is not on the list:
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_paale = 1) & the respondent was not registered with
a value in f4_P6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:2206] [Range:-]
|
f4_paale2
|
Variable label:
|
What business do you work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which organisation do you work for?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_paale = 2) & the respondent was not registered with
a value in f4_P6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2206]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 2 |
The Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 3 |
Maritime Pension Fund (Pension Insurance for Seamen) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 4 |
The Petroleum Safety Authority Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 5 |
The Norwegian Directorate for Children, Youth and Family Affairs |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 6 |
The Ombudsman for Children |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 7 |
The Consumer Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 8 |
The Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 9 |
The Financial Supervisory Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 10 |
The Norwegian Tax Administration |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 11 |
Statistics Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 12 |
Norwegian Customs |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 13 |
The Norwegian Directorate of eHealth |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 14 |
The Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 15 |
The Norwegian Institute of Public Health |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 16 |
The Norwegian Directorate of Health |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 17 |
The Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 18 |
The Norwegian Board of Health Supervision |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 19 |
The Norwegian Medicines Agency |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 20 |
Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection (DSB) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 21 |
The Directorate of Norwegian Correctional Service |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 22 |
The Norwegian National Security Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 23 |
The National Police Directorate |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 24 |
The Norwegian Civil Security Clearance Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 25 |
The Norwegian Civil Affairs Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 26 |
The Norwegian Directorate of Immigration |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 27 |
The Norwegian Environment Agency |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 28 |
The Norwegian Polar Institute |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 29 |
The Directorate for Cultural Heritage |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 30 |
The Norwegian Data Protection Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 31 |
The Norwegian Digitalisation Agency |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 32 |
The Norwegian Building Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 33 |
The Norwegian State Housing Bank |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 34 |
The Norwegian Communications Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 35 |
The Norwegian Mapping Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 36 |
The Norwegian Directorate of Elections |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 37 |
The National Archives Services of Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 38 |
Kulturtanken - Arts for Young Audiences Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 39 |
KORO |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 40 |
The Norwegian Gaming and Foundation Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 41 |
The Norwegian Media Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 42 |
The Norwegian Film Institute |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 43 |
Arts and Culture Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 44 |
The Directorate of Integration and Diversity |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 45 |
Norwegian Directorate for Higher Education and Skills |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 46 |
The Norwegian State Educational Loan Fund |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 47 |
The Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 48 |
The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 49 |
The Norwegian Agriculture Agency |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 50 |
The Norwegian Food Safety Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 51 |
The Brønnøysund Register Centre |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 52 |
The Norwegian Grocery Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 53 |
The Directorate of Mining with the Commissioner of Mines at Svalbard |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 54 |
The Directorate of Fisheries |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 55 |
The Norwegian Metrology Service |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 56 |
The Norwegian Competition Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 57 |
Norwegian Accreditation |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 58 |
Norwegian Nuclear Decommissioning |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 59 |
The Norwegian Industrial Property Office |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 60 |
The Norwegian Maritime Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 61 |
The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 62 |
The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 63 |
The Norwegian Railway Directorate |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 64 |
The Norwegian Coastal Administration |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 65 |
Civil Aviation Authority Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 66 |
The Norwegian Safety Investigation Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 67 |
The Norwegian Railway Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 68 |
Norwegian Public Roads Administration |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 69 |
The Road Supervisory Authority |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 70 |
The Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 999 |
My employer is not on the list |
0 |
|
NaN |
| Sysmiss |
|
2206 |
|
NA |
f4_paale2_999_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What business do you work in?: My employer is not on the list:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which organisation do you work for?
|
|
Literal question:
|
My employer is not on the list:
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_paale = 2) & the respondent was not registered with
a value in f4_P6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:2206] [Range:-]
|
f4_patas
|
Variable label:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Choose the option you spend most of your time on.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Investigation, analysis |
46 |
30.1% |
0.300653595 |
| 2 |
Business management/agency management |
5 |
3.3% |
0.032679739 |
| 3 |
Budgeting |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006535948 |
| 4 |
Advisory to political or administrative management |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006535948 |
| 5 |
Preparation/modification/implementation of laws and regulations etc. |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 6 |
Leadership |
12 |
7.8% |
0.078431373 |
| 7 |
Coordination |
11 |
7.2% |
0.071895425 |
| 8 |
Case management/individual decisions (cases concerning specific persons,
companies, institutions, etc.) |
31 |
20.3% |
0.202614379 |
| 9 |
Control/supervision/follow-up of public measures |
10 |
6.5% |
0.065359477 |
| 10 |
Information and communication work |
5 |
3.3% |
0.032679739 |
| 11 |
User inquiries/client services |
2 |
1.3% |
0.013071895 |
| 12 |
Administrative tasks (e.g. payroll and human resources management, IT/ICT,
operations and maintenance) |
14 |
9.2% |
0.091503268 |
| 13 |
Other: |
15 |
9.8% |
0.098039216 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_patas_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work
fall?:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:2206] [Range:-]
|
f4_palev
|
Variable label:
|
What is your current position level?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current position level?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Consultant/first consultant/senior consultant, or equivalent level |
6 |
3.9% |
0.03921569 |
| 2 |
Adviser/senior adviser or equivalent level |
119 |
77.8% |
0.77777778 |
| 3 |
Director/special adviser or equivalent level |
9 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
| 4 |
Associate director, or equivalent level |
4 |
2.6% |
0.02614379 |
| 5 |
Deputy Director or equivalent level |
7 |
4.6% |
0.04575163 |
| 6 |
Director General or equivalent level and above |
2 |
1.3% |
0.01307190 |
| 7 |
Other: |
6 |
3.9% |
0.03921569 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_palev_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What is your current position level?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your current position level?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:2206] [Range:-]
|
f4_pacon_1
|
Variable label:
|
How much weight do you place on each of the following considerations
when performing your duties?: Signals from political leadership
(government, ministers, state secretaries, political advisors)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much weight do you place on each of the following considerations
when performing your duties?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Signals from political leadership (government, ministers, state
secretaries, political advisors)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very large amount |
732 |
33.2% |
0.331822303 |
| 2 |
A large amount |
853 |
38.7% |
0.386672711 |
| 3 |
Neither a small nor a large amount |
371 |
16.8% |
0.168177697 |
| 4 |
A small amount |
133 |
6.0% |
0.060290118 |
| 5 |
Very little |
100 |
4.5% |
0.045330916 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.8% |
0.007706256 |
f4_pacon_2
|
Variable label:
|
How much weight do you place on each of the following considerations
when performing your duties?: Professional considerations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much weight do you place on each of the following considerations
when performing your duties?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Professional considerations
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very large amount |
1400 |
63.5% |
0.634632820 |
| 2 |
A large amount |
750 |
34.0% |
0.339981868 |
| 3 |
Neither a small nor a large amount |
27 |
1.2% |
0.012239347 |
| 4 |
A small amount |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002266546 |
| 5 |
Very little |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002719855 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.8% |
0.008159565 |
f4_pacon_3
|
Variable label:
|
How much weight do you place on each of the following considerations
when performing your duties?: Signals from user groups, clients, members
of society who are particularly affected
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much weight do you place on each of the following considerations
when performing your duties?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Signals from user groups, clients, members of society who are
particularly affected
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very large amount |
353 |
16.0% |
0.16001813 |
| 2 |
A large amount |
1205 |
54.6% |
0.54623753 |
| 3 |
Neither a small nor a large amount |
490 |
22.2% |
0.22212149 |
| 4 |
A small amount |
105 |
4.8% |
0.04759746 |
| 5 |
Very little |
23 |
1.0% |
0.01042611 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.4% |
0.01359927 |
f4_pacon_4
|
Variable label:
|
How much weight do you place on each of the following considerations
when performing your duties?: Signals from local/regional authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much weight do you place on each of the following considerations
when performing your duties?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Signals from local/regional authorities
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very large amount |
100 |
4.5% |
0.04533092 |
| 2 |
A large amount |
660 |
29.9% |
0.29918404 |
| 3 |
Neither a small nor a large amount |
867 |
39.3% |
0.39301904 |
| 4 |
A small amount |
327 |
14.8% |
0.14823209 |
| 5 |
Very little |
207 |
9.4% |
0.09383500 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
2.0% |
0.02039891 |
f4_pacon_5
|
Variable label:
|
How much weight do you place on each of the following considerations
when performing your duties?: Signals from EU institutions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much weight do you place on each of the following considerations
when performing your duties?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Signals from EU institutions
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very large amount |
163 |
7.4% |
0.07388939 |
| 2 |
A large amount |
589 |
26.7% |
0.26699909 |
| 3 |
Neither a small nor a large amount |
821 |
37.2% |
0.37216682 |
| 4 |
A small amount |
347 |
15.7% |
0.15729828 |
| 5 |
Very little |
251 |
11.4% |
0.11378060 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.6% |
0.01586582 |
f4_pacha_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It feels like there is constant change in my workplace.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It feels like there is constant change at my workplace.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
494 |
22.4% |
0.223934723 |
| 2 |
Agree |
651 |
29.5% |
0.295104261 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
568 |
25.7% |
0.257479601 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
184 |
8.3% |
0.083408885 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
151 |
6.8% |
0.068449683 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
123 |
5.6% |
0.055757026 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
26 |
1.2% |
0.011786038 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.4% |
0.004079782 |
f4_pacha_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It is difficult to know when the changes in my workplace
start or end.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is difficult to know when the changes at my workplace start or end.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
396 |
18.0% |
0.179510426 |
| 2 |
Agree |
513 |
23.3% |
0.232547597 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
439 |
19.9% |
0.199002720 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
318 |
14.4% |
0.144152312 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
209 |
9.5% |
0.094741614 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
254 |
11.5% |
0.115140526 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
64 |
2.9% |
0.029011786 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.6% |
0.005893019 |
f4_pacha_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Changes at my workplace happen so often that it affects
my work.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Changes at my workplace happen so often that they affect my work.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
201 |
9.1% |
0.09111514 |
| 2 |
Agree |
231 |
10.5% |
0.10471442 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
399 |
18.1% |
0.18087035 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
341 |
15.5% |
0.15457842 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
271 |
12.3% |
0.12284678 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
545 |
24.7% |
0.24705349 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
206 |
9.3% |
0.09338169 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.5% |
0.00543971 |
f4_wotfe_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: My immediate administrative manager: wants employees to
work on several tasks at the same time.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in your view of what it is like to work in [your
organisation/your ministry], and what expectations your immediate
administrative manager has of you when you are at work.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
My immediate administrative manager…
|
|
Literal question:
|
wants employees to work on multiple tasks at the same time.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
446 |
20.2% |
0.202175884 |
| 2 |
Agree |
984 |
44.6% |
0.446056210 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
374 |
17.0% |
0.169537625 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
260 |
11.8% |
0.117860381 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
52 |
2.4% |
0.023572076 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
22 |
1.0% |
0.009972801 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002266546 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
2.9% |
0.028558477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_wotfe_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: think it is best if employees complete one task before
starting something new.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in your view of what it is like to work in [your
organisation/your ministry], and what expectations your immediate
administrative manager has of you when you are at work.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
My immediate administrative manager…
|
|
Literal question:
|
thinks it is best if employees complete one task before starting
something new.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
16 |
0.7% |
0.007252947 |
| 2 |
Agree |
98 |
4.4% |
0.044424297 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
164 |
7.4% |
0.074342702 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
591 |
26.8% |
0.267905712 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
441 |
20.0% |
0.199909338 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
664 |
30.1% |
0.300997280 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
168 |
7.6% |
0.076155938 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
2.9% |
0.029011786 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_wotfe_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: prefer employees to give full attention to one task at a
time, rather than dividing their attention between different projects.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in your view of what it is like to work in [your
organisation/your ministry], and what expectations your immediate
administrative manager has of you when you are at work.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
My immediate administrative manager…
|
|
Literal question:
|
prefers that employees give their full attention to one task at a time,
rather than dividing their attention across different projects.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
0.6% |
0.006346328 |
| 2 |
Agree |
54 |
2.4% |
0.024478694 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
172 |
7.8% |
0.077969175 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
497 |
22.5% |
0.225294651 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
533 |
24.2% |
0.241613781 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
687 |
31.1% |
0.311423391 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
187 |
8.5% |
0.084768812 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
62 |
2.8% |
0.028105168 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_wotfe_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: concentrates on what is happening and needs to be done
today.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in your view of what it is like to work in [your
organisation/your ministry], and what expectations your immediate
administrative manager has of you when you are at work.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
My immediate administrative manager…
|
|
Literal question:
|
concentrates on what is happening and needs to be done today.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
166 |
7.5% |
0.07524932 |
| 2 |
Agree |
593 |
26.9% |
0.26881233 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
547 |
24.8% |
0.24796011 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
406 |
18.4% |
0.18404352 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
241 |
10.9% |
0.10924751 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
157 |
7.1% |
0.07116954 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
33 |
1.5% |
0.01495920 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
2.9% |
0.02855848 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_wotfe_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: looking ahead and planning for opportunities and
problems that the future will bring.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in your view of what it is like to work in [your
organisation/your ministry], and what expectations your immediate
administrative manager has of you when you are at work.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
My immediate administrative manager…
|
|
Literal question:
|
looks ahead and plans for opportunities and problems that the future
will bring.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
209 |
9.5% |
0.09474161 |
| 2 |
Agree |
808 |
36.6% |
0.36627380 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
550 |
24.9% |
0.24932004 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
213 |
9.7% |
0.09655485 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
181 |
8.2% |
0.08204896 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
129 |
5.8% |
0.05847688 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
52 |
2.4% |
0.02357208 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
2.9% |
0.02901179 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_wotfe_6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: focus on tasks and problems here and now, rather than
possible future questions and events.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in your view of what it is like to work in [your
organisation/your ministry], and what expectations your immediate
administrative manager has of you when you are at work.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
My immediate administrative manager…
|
|
Literal question:
|
focuses on tasks and problems that are here and now, rather than
possible future questions and events.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
119 |
5.4% |
0.05394379 |
| 2 |
Agree |
375 |
17.0% |
0.16999093 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
480 |
21.8% |
0.21758840 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
439 |
19.9% |
0.19900272 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
437 |
19.8% |
0.19809610 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
260 |
11.8% |
0.11786038 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
33 |
1.5% |
0.01495920 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
2.9% |
0.02855848 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_wotpe
|
Variable label:
|
Which statement do you think fits best with expectations about how you
perform your work tasks? My immediate administrative manager prefers
that
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which statement do you think fits best with expectations about how you
perform your work duties? My immediate administrative manager prefers
that…
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
employees begin a task immediately and finish work well before the deadline. |
313 |
14.2% |
0.14188577 |
| 2 |
employees work steadily on a task in the time available. |
1537 |
69.7% |
0.69673617 |
| 3 |
employees do most of the work on a task in a relatively short period of time
leading up to the deadline. |
254 |
11.5% |
0.11514053 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
102 |
4.6% |
0.04623753 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_wotpes_1
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least important: Internal guidelines or work manual provided by my
organization
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The two previous questions were about your view of the expectations
your immediate administrative manager has of you when you are at
work.
What are your assessments based on?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Internal guidelines or work manual provided by my organisation
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_wotfe is answered | f4_wotpe is answered) & the
respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - most important |
124 |
5.8% |
0.05772812 |
| 2 |
2 |
239 |
11.1% |
0.11126629 |
| 3 |
3 |
340 |
15.8% |
0.15828678 |
| 4 |
4 |
227 |
10.6% |
0.10567970 |
| 5 |
5 - least important |
602 |
28.0% |
0.28026071 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
616 |
28.7% |
0.28677840 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
58 |
|
NA |
f4_wotpes_2
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least important: Instructions and guidance from my direct
supervisor
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The two previous questions were about your view of the expectations
your immediate administrative manager has of you when you are at
work.
What are your assessments based on?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Instructions and guidance from my direct superior
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_wotfe is answered | f4_wotpe is answered) & the
respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - most important |
392 |
18.2% |
0.18249534 |
| 2 |
2 |
735 |
34.2% |
0.34217877 |
| 3 |
3 |
332 |
15.5% |
0.15456238 |
| 4 |
4 |
145 |
6.8% |
0.06750466 |
| 5 |
5 - least important |
63 |
2.9% |
0.02932961 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
481 |
22.4% |
0.22392924 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
58 |
|
NA |
f4_wotpes_3
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least important: Instructions and guidance from my colleagues
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The two previous questions were about your view of the expectations
your immediate administrative manager has of you when you are at
work.
What are your assessments based on?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Instructions and guidance from my colleagues
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_wotfe is answered | f4_wotpe is answered) & the
respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - most important |
22 |
1.0% |
0.01024209 |
| 2 |
2 |
115 |
5.4% |
0.05353818 |
| 3 |
3 |
341 |
15.9% |
0.15875233 |
| 4 |
4 |
686 |
31.9% |
0.31936685 |
| 5 |
5 - least important |
335 |
15.6% |
0.15595903 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
649 |
30.2% |
0.30214153 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
58 |
|
NA |
f4_wotpes_4
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least important: What I have observed my colleagues do
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The two previous questions were about your view of the expectations
your immediate administrative manager has of you when you are at
work.
What are your assessments based on?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Observations of what my colleagues do
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_wotfe is answered | f4_wotpe is answered) & the
respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - most important |
43 |
2.0% |
0.02001862 |
| 2 |
2 |
346 |
16.1% |
0.16108007 |
| 3 |
3 |
367 |
17.1% |
0.17085661 |
| 4 |
4 |
359 |
16.7% |
0.16713222 |
| 5 |
5 - least important |
455 |
21.2% |
0.21182495 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
578 |
26.9% |
0.26908752 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
58 |
|
NA |
f4_wotpes_5
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least important: My own experience working here
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The two previous questions were about your view of the expectations
your immediate administrative manager has of you when you are at
work.
What are your assessments based on?
|
|
Literal question:
|
My own experience of working here
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_wotfe is answered | f4_wotpe is answered) & the
respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - most important |
1518 |
70.7% |
0.70670391 |
| 2 |
2 |
278 |
12.9% |
0.12942272 |
| 3 |
3 |
169 |
7.9% |
0.07867784 |
| 4 |
4 |
69 |
3.2% |
0.03212291 |
| 5 |
5 - least important |
24 |
1.1% |
0.01117318 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
4.2% |
0.04189944 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
58 |
|
NA |
f4_piigix_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets a random variant of the question in [f4_piigix].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
[If [f4_piigix_ran] = 1, respondents are shown a tooltip after the text
in each answer option. The tooltip contains further information, and
examples of the different interest groups. If [f4_piigix_ran] = 2, no
tooltip is shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2128] [Invalid:78]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The respondent gets an infobox associated with each alternative answer |
1032 |
48.5% |
0.4849624 |
| 2 |
The respondent does not get an infobox |
1096 |
51.5% |
0.5150376 |
| Sysmiss |
|
78 |
|
NA |
f4_piigix_1
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least important: interest organizations for policy-making in your
sector: Trade unions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Interest groups are organisations whose task is to promote the
preferences of their members so that they are taken into account in
policymaking. These organisations represent different types of
interests. We would like you to indicate how important the following
interest groups are to your area of work by ranking them from most
important to least important:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Trade unions
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[If [f4_piigix_ran] = 1 the following text was shown in a tooltip: “For
instance the Union of Education Norway, the Norwegian Association of
Researchers, or the Norwegian Association of Lecturers”. If
[f4_piigix_ran] = 2 no tooltip was shown. Asked on the same page as
[f4_piigix_ir_1]. If respondent selected an option from [f4_piigix_ir_1]
this could not be selected, and vice-versa.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - most important |
250 |
11.3% |
0.11332729 |
| 2 |
2 |
225 |
10.2% |
0.10199456 |
| 3 |
3 |
211 |
9.6% |
0.09564823 |
| 4 |
4 |
238 |
10.8% |
0.10788758 |
| 5 |
5 - least important |
112 |
5.1% |
0.05077063 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1170 |
53.0% |
0.53037171 |
f4_piigix_2
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least important: interest organizations for policy-making in your
sector: Business organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Interest groups are organisations whose task is to promote the
preferences of their members so that they are taken into account in
policymaking. These organisations represent different types of
interests. We would like you to indicate how important the following
interest groups are to your area of work by ranking them from most
important to least important:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Business organisations
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[If [f4_piigix_ran] = 1 the following text was shown in a tooltip: “For
instance the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise or their affiliated
trade associations.”. If [f4_piigix_ran] = 2 no tooltip was shown. Asked
on the same page as [f4_piigix_ir_1]. If respondent selected an option
from [f4_piigix_ir_1] this could not be selected, and vice-versa.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - most important |
318 |
14.4% |
0.14415231 |
| 2 |
2 |
256 |
11.6% |
0.11604714 |
| 3 |
3 |
194 |
8.8% |
0.08794198 |
| 4 |
4 |
200 |
9.1% |
0.09066183 |
| 5 |
5 - least important |
93 |
4.2% |
0.04215775 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1145 |
51.9% |
0.51903898 |
f4_piigix_3
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least important: interest organizations for policy making in your
sector: Private providers of welfare services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Interest groups are organisations whose task is to promote the
preferences of their members so that they are taken into account in
policymaking. These organisations represent different types of
interests. We would like you to indicate how important the following
interest groups are to your area of work by ranking them from most
important to least important:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Private providers of welfare services
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[If [f4_piigix_ran] = 1 the following text was shown in a tooltip: “Both
commercial and non-profit, for instance Virke (Rehab) in the healthcare
sector.”. If [f4_piigix_ran] = 2 no tooltip was shown. Asked on the same
page as [f4_piigix_ir_1]. If respondent selected an option from
[f4_piigix_ir_1] this could not be selected, and vice-versa.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - most important |
30 |
1.4% |
0.01359927 |
| 2 |
2 |
28 |
1.3% |
0.01269266 |
| 3 |
3 |
87 |
3.9% |
0.03943790 |
| 4 |
4 |
168 |
7.6% |
0.07615594 |
| 5 |
5 - least important |
606 |
27.5% |
0.27470535 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1287 |
58.3% |
0.58340888 |
f4_piigix_4
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least important: interest organizations for policy-making in your
sector: User organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Interest groups are organisations whose task is to promote the
preferences of their members so that they are taken into account in
policymaking. These organisations represent different types of
interests. We would like you to indicate how important the following
interest groups are to your area of work by ranking them from most
important to least important:
|
|
Literal question:
|
User organisations
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[If [f4_piigix_ran] = 1 the following text was shown in a tooltip: “For
instance the National Union of Students in Norway in the education
sector, or the Norwegian Cancer Society in the healthcare sector.”. If
[f4_piigix_ran] = 2 no tooltip was shown. Asked on the same page as
[f4_piigix_ir_1]. If respondent selected an option from [f4_piigix_ir_1]
this could not be selected, and vice-versa.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - most important |
351 |
15.9% |
0.159111514 |
| 2 |
2 |
340 |
15.4% |
0.154125113 |
| 3 |
3 |
236 |
10.7% |
0.106980961 |
| 4 |
4 |
106 |
4.8% |
0.048050771 |
| 5 |
5 - least important |
20 |
0.9% |
0.009066183 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1153 |
52.3% |
0.522665458 |
f4_piigix_5
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least important: interest organizations for policy making in your
sector: Municipal sector
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Interest groups are organisations whose task is to promote the
preferences of their members so that they are taken into account in
policymaking. These organisations represent different types of
interests. We would like you to indicate how important the following
interest groups are to your area of work by ranking them from most
important to least important:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The municipal sector
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[If [f4_piigix_ran] = 1 the following text was shown in a tooltip: “For
instance the Norwegian Assoication of Local and Regional Authorities.”.
If [f4_piigix_ran] = 2 no tooltip was shown. Asked on the same page as
[f4_piigix_ir_1]. If respondent selected an option from [f4_piigix_ir_1]
this could not be selected, and vice-versa.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - most important |
237 |
10.7% |
0.10743427 |
| 2 |
2 |
224 |
10.2% |
0.10154125 |
| 3 |
3 |
249 |
11.3% |
0.11287398 |
| 4 |
4 |
213 |
9.7% |
0.09655485 |
| 5 |
5 - least important |
81 |
3.7% |
0.03671804 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1202 |
54.5% |
0.54487761 |
f4_piigix_ir_1
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least important: Interest organizations are not relevant to the
work in my unit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Interest groups are organisations whose task is to promote the
preferences of their members so that they are taken into account in
policymaking. These organisations represent different types of
interests. We would like you to indicate how important the following
interest groups are to your area of work by ranking them from most
important to least important:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Interest groups are of little relevance to the work of my unit
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Asked on the same page as [f4_piigix_1] - [f4_piigix_5]. If respondent
selected an option from [f4_piigix_1] - [f4_piigix_5], this could not be
selected, and vice-versa.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
895 |
40.6% |
0.40571170 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1210 |
54.9% |
0.54850408 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
101 |
4.6% |
0.04578422 |
f4_piigfx_pipe
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets an element for text piping in [f4_piigfx] based on the
answer from [f4_piigix].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Set if (f4_piigix is answered)]
[Element chosen based on top-ranked answer given in [f4_piigix].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1186] [Invalid:1020]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Trade unions |
250 |
21.1% |
0.21079258 |
| 2 |
Trade and industry organisations |
318 |
26.8% |
0.26812816 |
| 3 |
Private providers of welfare services |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02529511 |
| 4 |
User organisations |
351 |
29.6% |
0.29595278 |
| 5 |
Municipal sector |
237 |
20.0% |
0.19983137 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1020 |
|
NA |
f4_piigfx_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following factors are to include
[f4_piigfx_pipe] in policy making: They have significant expertise in
this policy area
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[f4_piigfx_pipe] may be relevant to policymaking in various ways. How
important do you think the following factors are regarding their
inclusion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
They have considerable expertise in this policy area
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_piigix is answered)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
258 |
21.8% |
0.21753794 |
| 2 |
Important |
520 |
43.8% |
0.43844857 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
284 |
23.9% |
0.23946037 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
74 |
6.2% |
0.06239460 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01854975 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
2.4% |
0.02360877 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1020 |
|
NA |
f4_piigfx_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following factors are to include
[f4_piigfx_pipe] in policy making: It reduces the level of conflict in
policy making
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[f4_piigfx_pipe] may be relevant to policymaking in various ways. How
important do you think the following factors are regarding their
inclusion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It reduces the level of conflict in policymaking
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_piigix is answered)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
187 |
15.8% |
0.15767285 |
| 2 |
Important |
452 |
38.1% |
0.38111298 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
324 |
27.3% |
0.27318718 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
150 |
12.6% |
0.12647555 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
44 |
3.7% |
0.03709949 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
2.4% |
0.02445194 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1020 |
|
NA |
f4_piigfx_3
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following factors are to include
[f4_piigfx_pipe] in policy making: Their participation will facilitate
implementation (of policy proposals/decisions)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[f4_piigfx_pipe] may be relevant to policymaking in various ways. How
important do you think the following factors are regarding their
inclusion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Their participation will facilitate implementation (of political
proposals/decisions)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_piigix is answered)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
296 |
25.0% |
0.24957841 |
| 2 |
Important |
543 |
45.8% |
0.45784148 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
247 |
20.8% |
0.20826307 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
56 |
4.7% |
0.04721754 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
17 |
1.4% |
0.01433390 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2.3% |
0.02276560 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1020 |
|
NA |
f4_piigfx_4
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following factors are to include
[f4_piigfx_pipe] in policy making: They represent a group with crucial
interests in this policy area
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[f4_piigfx_pipe] may be relevant to policymaking in various ways. How
important do you think the following factors are regarding their
inclusion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
They represent a group with vital interests in this area of politics
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (f4_piigix is answered)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
372 |
31.4% |
0.313659359 |
| 2 |
Important |
581 |
49.0% |
0.489881956 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
165 |
13.9% |
0.139123103 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
33 |
2.8% |
0.027824621 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007588533 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
2.2% |
0.021922428 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1020 |
|
NA |
f4_piigax_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets a random element for text piping in [f4_piigax].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
[If [f4_piigax_ran] = 1 the first element is selected. If
[f4_piigax_ran] = 2 the second element is selected. If [f4_piigax_ran] =
3 the third element is selected. If [f4_piigax_ran] = 4 the fourth
element is selected.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2092] [Invalid:114]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
a proposal concerning the amendment of the fundamental principles of this policy
area |
526 |
25.1% |
0.2514340 |
| 2 |
a proposal regarding a minor adjustment in this policy area |
502 |
24.0% |
0.2399618 |
| 3 |
a new White Paper |
561 |
26.8% |
0.2681644 |
| 4 |
a new NOU (Official Norwegian Reports) |
503 |
24.0% |
0.2404398 |
| Sysmiss |
|
114 |
|
NA |
f4_piigax
|
Variable label:
|
Legitimacy/quality: Participation of interest groups in policy making
|
|
Literal question:
|
When working with [f4_piigax_ran], do you consider participation from
interest groups to be more important in ensuring the legitimacy or
quality of the work?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Asked on the same page as [f4_piigax_ir]. If respondent selected an
option in [f4_piigax_ir], this could not be selected, and vice-versa.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:988] [Invalid:1218]
[Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - more important for legitimacy |
77 |
7.8% |
0.07793522 |
| 1 |
1 |
168 |
17.0% |
0.17004049 |
| 2 |
2 |
187 |
18.9% |
0.18927126 |
| 3 |
3 |
298 |
30.2% |
0.30161943 |
| 4 |
4 |
121 |
12.2% |
0.12246964 |
| 5 |
5 |
105 |
10.6% |
0.10627530 |
| 6 |
6 - more important for quality |
32 |
3.2% |
0.03238866 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1218 |
|
NA |
f4_piigax_ir
|
Variable label:
|
Legitimacy/quality: Participation of interest groups in policy-making:
no experience with this type of work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When working with [f4_piigax_ran], do you consider participation from
interest groups to be more important in ensuring the legitimacy or
quality of the work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do not have experience regarding this type of work
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Asked on the same page as [f4_piigax]. If respondent selected an option
in [f4_piigax], this could not be selected, and vice-versa.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1064 |
48.2% |
0.48232094 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1016 |
46.1% |
0.46056210 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
126 |
5.7% |
0.05711695 |
f4_pititx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random element for text piping in [f4_pititx].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
[If [f4_pititx_ran1] = 1 the first element is selected. If
[f4_pititx_ran1] = 2 the second element is selected.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2075] [Invalid:131]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[BLANK] |
1033 |
49.8% |
0.4978313 |
| 2 |
It is about nine months before the upcoming general election. |
1042 |
50.2% |
0.5021687 |
| Sysmiss |
|
131 |
|
NA |
f4_pititx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random element for text piping in [f4_pititx].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
[If [f4_pititx_ran2] = 1 the first element is selected. If
[f4_pititx_ran2] = 2 the second element is selected. If [f4_pititx_ran2]
= 3 the third element is selected. If [f4_pititx_ran2] = 4 the fourth
element is selected. If [f4_pititx_ran2] = 5 the fifth element is
selected. If [f4_pititx_ran2] = 6 the sixth element is selected.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2075] [Invalid:131]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[BLANK] |
306 |
14.7% |
0.1474699 |
| 2 |
Experts at your unit largely agree that the proposed measures are not effective
in achieving the set goals. |
335 |
16.1% |
0.1614458 |
| 3 |
Experts at your unit generally agree that the proposed measures are effective in
achieving the set goals. |
299 |
14.4% |
0.1440964 |
| 4 |
Experts at your unit generally agree that the proposed measures are not in
accordance with the framework set by the applicable legislation. |
283 |
13.6% |
0.1363855 |
| 5 |
Experts at your unit generally agree that the proposed measures are in
accordance with the framework set by the applicable legislation. |
278 |
13.4% |
0.1339759 |
| 6 |
Experts at your unit generally agree that the proposed measures will mainly
benefit voters from the governing parties. |
271 |
13.1% |
0.1306024 |
| 7 |
Experts at your unit generally agree that the proposed measures will benefit all
segments of the Norwegian population. |
303 |
14.6% |
0.1460241 |
| Sysmiss |
|
131 |
|
NA |
f4_pititx_ranorder
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets which question comes first of [f4_pititx1] and
[f4_pititx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2075] [Invalid:131]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
f4_pititx1 first |
1016 |
49.0% |
0.4896386 |
| 2 |
f4_pititx2 first |
1059 |
51.0% |
0.5103614 |
| Sysmiss |
|
131 |
|
NA |
f4_pititx1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Probability that the civil service will use the following procedures in
this situation: Propose the longest possible response deadlines for
public consultation and statements from other concerned ministries (eg
more than 3 months).
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 1:
Please consider the following hypothetical situation carefully, and
honestly answer the questions that follow:
[f4_pititx_ran1]The minister responsible for your policy area wants
to introduce an ambitious policy measure which will require significant
changes to existing legislation. [f4_pititx_ran2]
Your unit holds the primary responsibility for the formal
investigation and preparation process in line with official guidelines
(Utredningsinstruksen 2016). In your opinion, how likely is it that the
civil service will adopt the following procedures in this
situation?:]
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 2:
Keep in mind still the formal investigation and preparation process
described previously. In your opinion, how likely is it that the civil
service will adopt the following procedures in this situation?:]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Propose the longest possible response deadlines for public consultation
and statements from other relevant ministries (e.g. more than 3 months).
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
30 |
1.4% |
0.01359927 |
| 2 |
Likely |
148 |
6.7% |
0.06708976 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
307 |
13.9% |
0.13916591 |
| 4 |
Unlikely |
806 |
36.5% |
0.36536718 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
293 |
13.3% |
0.13281958 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
331 |
15.0% |
0.15004533 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
291 |
13.2% |
0.13191296 |
f4_pititx1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Probability that the civil service will use the following procedures in
this situation: Suggest risk and socio-economic analyses, although
strictly speaking it is not required.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 1:
Please consider the following hypothetical situation carefully, and
honestly answer the questions that follow:
[f4_pititx_ran1]The minister responsible for your policy area wants
to introduce an ambitious policy measure which will require significant
changes to existing legislation. [f4_pititx_ran2]
Your unit holds the primary responsibility for the formal
investigation and preparation process in line with official guidelines
(Utredningsinstruksen 2016). In your opinion, how likely is it that the
civil service will adopt the following procedures in this
situation?:]
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 2:
Keep in mind still the formal investigation and preparation process
described previously. In your opinion, how likely is it that the civil
service will adopt the following procedures in this situation?:]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Propose cost-benefit analyses, even if strictly speaking they are not
required.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
51 |
2.3% |
0.02311877 |
| 2 |
Likely |
242 |
11.0% |
0.10970082 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
412 |
18.7% |
0.18676337 |
| 4 |
Unlikely |
673 |
30.5% |
0.30507706 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
231 |
10.5% |
0.10471442 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
305 |
13.8% |
0.13825929 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
292 |
13.2% |
0.13236627 |
f4_pititx1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Probability that the civil service will use the following procedures in
this situation: Taking more time than necessary to identify, investigate
and evaluate the effects of alternative measures.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 1:
Please consider the following hypothetical situation carefully, and
honestly answer the questions that follow:
[f4_pititx_ran1]The minister responsible for your policy area wants
to introduce an ambitious policy measure which will require significant
changes to existing legislation. [f4_pititx_ran2]
Your unit holds the primary responsibility for the formal
investigation and preparation process in line with official guidelines
(Utredningsinstruksen 2016). In your opinion, how likely is it that the
civil service will adopt the following procedures in this
situation?:]
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 2:
Keep in mind still the formal investigation and preparation process
described previously. In your opinion, how likely is it that the civil
service will adopt the following procedures in this situation?:]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Spend more time than necessary identifying, investigating and assessing
the effects of alternative measures.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
50 |
2.3% |
0.02266546 |
| 2 |
Likely |
164 |
7.4% |
0.07434270 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
334 |
15.1% |
0.15140526 |
| 4 |
Unlikely |
785 |
35.6% |
0.35584769 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
300 |
13.6% |
0.13599275 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
284 |
12.9% |
0.12873980 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
289 |
13.1% |
0.13100635 |
f4_pititx1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Probability that the civil service will use the following procedures in
this situation: Examine legal arguments against rapid implementation of
the proposed measures.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 1:
Please consider the following hypothetical situation carefully, and
honestly answer the questions that follow:
[f4_pititx_ran1]The minister responsible for your policy area wants
to introduce an ambitious policy measure which will require significant
changes to existing legislation. [f4_pititx_ran2]
Your unit holds the primary responsibility for the formal
investigation and preparation process in line with official guidelines
(Utredningsinstruksen 2016). In your opinion, how likely is it that the
civil service will adopt the following procedures in this
situation?:]
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 2:
Keep in mind still the formal investigation and preparation process
described previously. In your opinion, how likely is it that the civil
service will adopt the following procedures in this situation?:]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Investigate legal arguments against rapid implementation of the proposed
measures.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
152 |
6.9% |
0.06890299 |
| 2 |
Likely |
463 |
21.0% |
0.20988214 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
474 |
21.5% |
0.21486854 |
| 4 |
Unlikely |
394 |
17.9% |
0.17860381 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
129 |
5.8% |
0.05847688 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
301 |
13.6% |
0.13644606 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
293 |
13.3% |
0.13281958 |
f4_pititx1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Probability that the civil service will use the following procedures in
this situation: Leaking information about the proposed measures before
the case becomes public.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 1:
Please consider the following hypothetical situation carefully, and
honestly answer the questions that follow:
[f4_pititx_ran1]The minister responsible for your policy area wants
to introduce an ambitious policy measure which will require significant
changes to existing legislation. [f4_pititx_ran2]
Your unit holds the primary responsibility for the formal
investigation and preparation process in line with official guidelines
(Utredningsinstruksen 2016). In your opinion, how likely is it that the
civil service will adopt the following procedures in this
situation?:]
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 2:
Keep in mind still the formal investigation and preparation process
described previously. In your opinion, how likely is it that the civil
service will adopt the following procedures in this situation?:]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Leak information about the proposed measures before the matter becomes
public.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
13 |
0.6% |
0.005893019 |
| 2 |
Likely |
58 |
2.6% |
0.026291931 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
128 |
5.8% |
0.058023572 |
| 4 |
Unlikely |
520 |
23.6% |
0.235720762 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
884 |
40.1% |
0.400725295 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
314 |
14.2% |
0.142339075 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
289 |
13.1% |
0.131006346 |
f4_pititx2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Probability that the civil service will use the following procedures in
this situation: Propose shortest possible response deadlines for public
consultation and statements from other concerned ministries (e.g. less
than 6 weeks).
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 2:
Please consider the following hypothetical situation carefully, and
honestly answer the questions that follow:
[f4_pititx_ran1]The minister responsible for your policy area wants
to introduce an ambitious policy measure which will require significant
changes to existing legislation. [f4_pititx_ran2]
Your unit holds the primary responsibility for the formal
investigation and preparation process in line with official guidelines
(Utredningsinstruksen 2016). In your opinion, how likely is it that the
civil service will adopt the following procedures in this
situation?:]
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 1:
Keep in mind still the formal investigation and preparation process
described previously. In your opinion, how likely is it that the civil
service will adopt the following procedures in this situation?:]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Propose the shortest possible response deadlines for public consultation
and statements from other relevant ministries (e.g. less than 6 weeks).
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
56 |
2.5% |
0.02538531 |
| 2 |
Likely |
206 |
9.3% |
0.09338169 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
415 |
18.8% |
0.18812330 |
| 4 |
Unlikely |
699 |
31.7% |
0.31686310 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
221 |
10.0% |
0.10018132 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
322 |
14.6% |
0.14596555 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
287 |
13.0% |
0.13009973 |
f4_pititx2_7
|
Variable label:
|
Probability that the civil service will use the following procedures in
this situation: Argue for omitting risk and socio-economic analyses.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 2:
Please consider the following hypothetical situation carefully, and
honestly answer the questions that follow:
[f4_pititx_ran1]The minister responsible for your policy area wants
to introduce an ambitious policy measure which will require significant
changes to existing legislation. [f4_pititx_ran2]
Your unit holds the primary responsibility for the formal
investigation and preparation process in line with official guidelines
(Utredningsinstruksen 2016). In your opinion, how likely is it that the
civil service will adopt the following procedures in this
situation?:]
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 1:
Keep in mind still the formal investigation and preparation process
described previously. In your opinion, how likely is it that the civil
service will adopt the following procedures in this situation?:]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Argue for omitting cost-benefit analyses.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
28 |
1.3% |
0.01269266 |
| 2 |
Likely |
100 |
4.5% |
0.04533092 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
256 |
11.6% |
0.11604714 |
| 4 |
Unlikely |
796 |
36.1% |
0.36083409 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
419 |
19.0% |
0.18993654 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
320 |
14.5% |
0.14505893 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
287 |
13.0% |
0.13009973 |
f4_pititx2_8
|
Variable label:
|
Probability that the civil service will use the following procedures in
this situation: Do not spend more time than absolutely necessary to
identify, investigate and evaluate the effects of alternative measures.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 2:
Please consider the following hypothetical situation carefully, and
honestly answer the questions that follow:
[f4_pititx_ran1]The minister responsible for your policy area wants
to introduce an ambitious policy measure which will require significant
changes to existing legislation. [f4_pititx_ran2]
Your unit holds the primary responsibility for the formal
investigation and preparation process in line with official guidelines
(Utredningsinstruksen 2016). In your opinion, how likely is it that the
civil service will adopt the following procedures in this
situation?:]
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 1:
Keep in mind still the formal investigation and preparation process
described previously. In your opinion, how likely is it that the civil
service will adopt the following procedures in this situation?:]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do not spend more time than absolutely necessary on identifying,
investigating and assessing the effects of alternative measures.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
122 |
5.5% |
0.05530372 |
| 2 |
Likely |
503 |
22.8% |
0.22801451 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
516 |
23.4% |
0.23390752 |
| 4 |
Unlikely |
389 |
17.6% |
0.17633726 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
100 |
4.5% |
0.04533092 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
289 |
13.1% |
0.13100635 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
287 |
13.0% |
0.13009973 |
f4_pititx2_9
|
Variable label:
|
Probability that the civil service will use the following procedures in
this situation: Examine legal arguments in support of rapid
implementation of the proposed measures.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 2:
Please consider the following hypothetical situation carefully, and
honestly answer the questions that follow:
[f4_pititx_ran1]The minister responsible for your policy area wants
to introduce an ambitious policy measure which will require significant
changes to existing legislation. [f4_pititx_ran2]
Your unit holds the primary responsibility for the formal
investigation and preparation process in line with official guidelines
(Utredningsinstruksen 2016). In your opinion, how likely is it that the
civil service will adopt the following procedures in this
situation?:]
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 1:
Keep in mind still the formal investigation and preparation process
described previously. In your opinion, how likely is it that the civil
service will adopt the following procedures in this situation?:]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Investigate legal arguments in support of rapid implementation of the
proposed measures.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
211 |
9.6% |
0.09564823 |
| 2 |
Likely |
581 |
26.3% |
0.26337262 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
523 |
23.7% |
0.23708069 |
| 4 |
Unlikely |
247 |
11.2% |
0.11196736 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
44 |
2.0% |
0.01994560 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
311 |
14.1% |
0.14097915 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
289 |
13.1% |
0.13100635 |
f4_pititx2_10
|
Variable label:
|
Probability that the civil service will use the following procedures in
this situation: Ensure that the civil service treats the case
confidentially before it is to be made public.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 2:
Please consider the following hypothetical situation carefully, and
honestly answer the questions that follow:
[f4_pititx_ran1]The minister responsible for your policy area wants
to introduce an ambitious policy measure which will require significant
changes to existing legislation. [f4_pititx_ran2]
Your unit holds the primary responsibility for the formal
investigation and preparation process in line with official guidelines
(Utredningsinstruksen 2016). In your opinion, how likely is it that the
civil service will adopt the following procedures in this
situation?:]
[If [f4_pititx_ranorder] = 1:
Keep in mind still the formal investigation and preparation process
described previously. In your opinion, how likely is it that the civil
service will adopt the following procedures in this situation?:]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Ensure that the civil service processes the matter confidentially until
it is made public.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
661 |
30.0% |
0.29963735 |
| 2 |
Likely |
601 |
27.2% |
0.27243880 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
226 |
10.2% |
0.10244787 |
| 4 |
Unlikely |
110 |
5.0% |
0.04986401 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
35 |
1.6% |
0.01586582 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
292 |
13.2% |
0.13236627 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
281 |
12.7% |
0.12737987 |
f4_wotmcx1_perfor1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random personal relationship for Candidate A in
[f4_wotmcx1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has studied together with the state secretary of a senior ministry |
288 |
14.5% |
0.1453811 |
| 2 |
Is married to a senior government executive outside your sector |
320 |
16.2% |
0.1615346 |
| 3 |
Is in the minister’s circle of friends |
298 |
15.0% |
0.1504291 |
| 4 |
Has studied together with the state secretary of a senior ministry |
351 |
17.7% |
0.1771832 |
| 5 |
Is married to a senior government executive outside your sector |
362 |
18.3% |
0.1827360 |
| 6 |
Is in the circle of friends of a minister at a senior ministry |
362 |
18.3% |
0.1827360 |
| Sysmiss |
|
225 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_perfor2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random personal relationship for Candidate B in
[f4_wotmcx1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has studied together with the state secretary of a senior ministry |
327 |
16.5% |
0.1650681 |
| 2 |
Is married to a senior government executive outside your sector |
305 |
15.4% |
0.1539626 |
| 3 |
Is in the minister’s circle of friends |
273 |
13.8% |
0.1378092 |
| 4 |
Has studied together with the state secretary of a senior ministry |
366 |
18.5% |
0.1847552 |
| 5 |
Is married to a senior government executive outside your sector |
362 |
18.3% |
0.1827360 |
| 6 |
Is in the circle of friends of a minister at a senior ministry |
348 |
17.6% |
0.1756689 |
| Sysmiss |
|
225 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_fageks1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random subject expertise for Candidate A in
[f4_wotmcx1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized between 1 and 2 if [f4_P6] = 1. Randomized between 3 and 4
if [f4_P6] = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Specialist with strong professional expertise in the ministry’s area of
responsibility |
455 |
23.0% |
0.2296820 |
| 2 |
Generalist with little professional expertise in the ministry’s area of
responsibility |
451 |
22.8% |
0.2276628 |
| 3 |
Specialist with strong professional expertise in the organisation's area of
responsibility |
539 |
27.2% |
0.2720848 |
| 4 |
Generalist with little professional expertise in the organisation's area of
responsibility |
536 |
27.1% |
0.2705704 |
| Sysmiss |
|
225 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_fageks2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random subject expertise for Candidate B in
[f4_wotmcx1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized between 1 and 2 if [f4_P6] = 1. Randomized between 3 and 4
if [f4_P6] = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Specialist with strong professional expertise in the ministry’s area of
responsibility |
490 |
24.7% |
0.2473498 |
| 2 |
Generalist with little professional expertise in the ministry’s area of
responsibility |
414 |
20.9% |
0.2089854 |
| 3 |
Specialist with strong professional expertise in the organisation's area of
responsibility |
546 |
27.6% |
0.2756184 |
| 4 |
Generalist with little professional expertise in the organisation's area of
responsibility |
531 |
26.8% |
0.2680464 |
| Sysmiss |
|
225 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_arberf1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random work experience for Candidate A in [f4_wotmcx1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has work experience from your ministry |
454 |
22.9% |
0.2291772 |
| 2 |
Has no work experience from your ministry |
452 |
22.8% |
0.2281676 |
| 3 |
Has work experience from your organisation |
530 |
26.8% |
0.2675416 |
| 4 |
Has no work experience from your organisation |
545 |
27.5% |
0.2751136 |
| Sysmiss |
|
225 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_arberf2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random work experience for Candidate B in [f4_wotmcx1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has work experience from your ministry |
452 |
22.8% |
0.2281676 |
| 2 |
Has no work experience from your ministry |
453 |
22.9% |
0.2286724 |
| 3 |
Has work experience from your organisation |
584 |
29.5% |
0.2948006 |
| 4 |
Has no work experience from your organisation |
492 |
24.8% |
0.2483594 |
| Sysmiss |
|
225 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_person1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random personality for Candidate A in [f4_wotmcx1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ambitious reformer |
633 |
32.0% |
0.3195356 |
| 2 |
Pragmatic |
660 |
33.3% |
0.3331651 |
| 3 |
Oriented towards the status quo |
688 |
34.7% |
0.3472993 |
| Sysmiss |
|
225 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_person2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random personality for Candidate B in [f4_wotmcx1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ambitious reformer |
644 |
32.5% |
0.3250883 |
| 2 |
Pragmatic |
667 |
33.7% |
0.3366986 |
| 3 |
Oriented towards the status quo |
670 |
33.8% |
0.3382130 |
| Sysmiss |
|
225 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_polakt1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random political activity for Candidate A in
[f4_wotmcx1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has never been active in a political party |
645 |
32.6% |
0.3255931 |
| 2 |
Has been active in a party that is currently in the government |
678 |
34.2% |
0.3422514 |
| 3 |
Has been active in a party that is not currently in the government |
658 |
33.2% |
0.3321555 |
| Sysmiss |
|
225 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_polakt2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random political activity for Candidate B in
[f4_wotmcx1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has never been active in a political party |
649 |
32.8% |
0.3276123 |
| 2 |
Has been active in a party that is currently in the government |
645 |
32.6% |
0.3255931 |
| 3 |
Has been active in a party that is not currently in the government |
687 |
34.7% |
0.3467945 |
| Sysmiss |
|
225 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_karvei1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random career path for Candidate A in [f4_wotmcx1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has many years of work experience from the public sector |
658 |
33.2% |
0.3321555 |
| 2 |
Has many years of experience from the private sector |
653 |
33.0% |
0.3296315 |
| 3 |
Has many years of experience from the non-profit sector |
670 |
33.8% |
0.3382130 |
| Sysmiss |
|
225 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_karvei2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random career path for Candidate B in [f4_wotmcx1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has many years of work experience from the public sector |
663 |
33.5% |
0.3346795 |
| 2 |
Has many years of experience from the private sector |
692 |
34.9% |
0.3493185 |
| 3 |
Has many years of experience from the non-profit sector |
626 |
31.6% |
0.3160020 |
| Sysmiss |
|
225 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_rerandomize
|
Variable label:
|
Technical details of a possible rerandomization of the
f4_wotmcx1-variables.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Contains information if there was a need to rerandomize the candidates’
attributes.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:-]
|
f4_wotmcx1_roworder
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. The random order the attributes were shown in in the table
for [f4_wotmcx1]. Given sequentially, sorted by row number.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The random order the attributes were shown in in the table for
[f4_wotmcx1]. Shows the topics’ rowwise placement, sorted by topic. If
the first number is 2 it means that topic 1 (personal relationships) was
shown in row number 2, and if the the second number is 4 it means that
topic 2 (subject expertise) was shown in row number 4, etc. See
[f4_wotmcx1_roworder_seq] for the sequential order, sorted by row
number.
1 = Personal relationships. 2 = Subject expertise. 3 = Work experience.
4 = Personality. 5 = Political activity. 6 = Career path.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:-]
|
f4_wotmcx1_roworder_seq
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. The random order the attributes were shown in in the table
for [f4_wotmcx1]. Given as a topic’s rowwise placement, sorted by topic.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The random order the attributes were shown in in the table for
[f4_wotmcx1]. Shows the topics’ placement, sorted by row number. The
first number indicates what topic was shown in the first row, while the
next number shows what topic was shown in the second row, etc.
1 = Personal relationships. 2 = Subject expertise. 3 = Work experience.
4 = Personality. 5 = Political activity. 6 = Career path.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1981] [Invalid:225]
[Range:-]
|
f4_wotmcx1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I would like to work under candidate A’s management.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that there is a vacant position in the senior management of
your organisation.
There are several candidates who stand out in the recommendation.
Carefully read the description of two of these candidates and consider
the questions below.
Candidate A:
f4_wotmcx1_perfor1
f4_wotmcx1_fageks1
f4_wotmcx1_arberf1
f4_wotmcx1_person1
f4_wotmcx1_polakt1
f4_wotmcx1_karvei1
Candidate B:
f4_wotmcx1_perfor2
f4_wotmcx1_fageks2
f4_wotmcx1_arberf2
f4_wotmcx1_person2
f4_wotmcx1_polakt2
f4_wotmcx1_karvei2
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I would have liked to work under candidate A’s leadership.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Respondents were shown the candidates’ attributes in a table. The
variables were shown in a random order which can be found in
[f4_wotmcx1_roworder] and [f4_wotmcx1_roworder_seq]. Asked on the same
page as [f4_wotmcx1p].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
113 |
5.1% |
0.05122393 |
| 2 |
Agree |
467 |
21.2% |
0.21169538 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
373 |
16.9% |
0.16908432 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
514 |
23.3% |
0.23300091 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
257 |
11.7% |
0.11650045 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
147 |
6.7% |
0.06663645 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
55 |
2.5% |
0.02493200 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
280 |
12.7% |
0.12692656 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I would like to work under candidate B’s management.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that there is a vacant position in the senior management of
your organisation.
There are several candidates who stand out in the recommendation.
Carefully read the description of two of these candidates and consider
the questions below.
Candidate A:
f4_wotmcx1_perfor1
f4_wotmcx1_fageks1
f4_wotmcx1_arberf1
f4_wotmcx1_person1
f4_wotmcx1_polakt1
f4_wotmcx1_karvei1
Candidate B:
f4_wotmcx1_perfor2
f4_wotmcx1_fageks2
f4_wotmcx1_arberf2
f4_wotmcx1_person2
f4_wotmcx1_polakt2
f4_wotmcx1_karvei2
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I would have liked to work under candidate B’s leadership.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Respondents were shown the candidates’ attributes in a table. The
variables were shown in a random order which can be found in
[f4_wotmcx1_roworder] and [f4_wotmcx1_roworder_seq]. Asked on the same
page as [f4_wotmcx1p].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
97 |
4.4% |
0.04397099 |
| 2 |
Agree |
488 |
22.1% |
0.22121487 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
427 |
19.4% |
0.19356301 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
498 |
22.6% |
0.22574796 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
250 |
11.3% |
0.11332729 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
117 |
5.3% |
0.05303717 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
45 |
2.0% |
0.02039891 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
284 |
12.9% |
0.12873980 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx1p
|
Variable label:
|
All things considered, under which candidate’s leadership would you
prefer to work?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that there is a vacant position in the senior management of
your organisation.
There are several candidates who stand out in the recommendation.
Carefully read the description of two of these candidates and consider
the questions below.
Candidate A:
f4_wotmcx1_perfor1
f4_wotmcx1_fageks1
f4_wotmcx1_arberf1
f4_wotmcx1_person1
f4_wotmcx1_polakt1
f4_wotmcx1_karvei1
Candidate B:
f4_wotmcx1_perfor2
f4_wotmcx1_fageks2
f4_wotmcx1_arberf2
f4_wotmcx1_person2
f4_wotmcx1_polakt2
f4_wotmcx1_karvei2
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, under which candidate’s leadership would you
prefer to work?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Respondents were shown the candidates’ attributes in a table. The
variables were shown in a random order which can be found in
[f4_wotmcx1_roworder] and [f4_wotmcx1_roworder_seq]. Asked on the same
page as [f4_wotmcx1].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Candidate A |
874 |
39.6% |
0.3961922 |
| 2 |
Candidate B |
983 |
44.6% |
0.4456029 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
349 |
15.8% |
0.1582049 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_perfor1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random personal relationship for Candidate C in
[f4_wotmcx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has studied together with the state secretary of a senior ministry |
290 |
14.7% |
0.1470588 |
| 2 |
Is married to a senior government executive outside your sector |
280 |
14.2% |
0.1419878 |
| 3 |
Is in the minister’s circle of friends |
333 |
16.9% |
0.1688641 |
| 4 |
Has studied together with the state secretary of a senior ministry |
343 |
17.4% |
0.1739351 |
| 5 |
Is married to a senior government executive outside your sector |
361 |
18.3% |
0.1830629 |
| 6 |
Is in the circle of friends of a minister at a senior ministry |
365 |
18.5% |
0.1850913 |
| Sysmiss |
|
234 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_perfor2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random personal relationship for Candidate D in
[f4_wotmcx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has studied together with the state secretary of a senior ministry |
327 |
16.6% |
0.1658215 |
| 2 |
Is married to a senior government executive outside your sector |
301 |
15.3% |
0.1526369 |
| 3 |
Is in the minister’s circle of friends |
275 |
13.9% |
0.1394523 |
| 4 |
Has studied together with the state secretary of a senior ministry |
353 |
17.9% |
0.1790061 |
| 5 |
Is married to a senior government executive outside your sector |
364 |
18.5% |
0.1845842 |
| 6 |
Is in the circle of friends of a minister at a senior ministry |
352 |
17.8% |
0.1784990 |
| Sysmiss |
|
234 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_fageks1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random subject expertise for Candidate C in
[f4_wotmcx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized between 1 and 2 if [f4_P6] = 1. Randomized between 3 and 4
if [f4_P6] = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Specialist with strong professional expertise in the ministry’s area of
responsibility |
444 |
22.5% |
0.2251521 |
| 2 |
Generalist with little professional expertise in the ministry’s area of
responsibility |
459 |
23.3% |
0.2327586 |
| 3 |
Specialist with strong professional expertise in the organisation's area of
responsibility |
504 |
25.6% |
0.2555781 |
| 4 |
Generalist with little professional expertise in the organisation's area of
responsibility |
565 |
28.7% |
0.2865112 |
| Sysmiss |
|
234 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_fageks2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random subject expertise for Candidate D in
[f4_wotmcx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized between 1 and 2 if [f4_P6] = 1. Randomized between 3 and 4
if [f4_P6] = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Specialist with strong professional expertise in the ministry’s area of
responsibility |
457 |
23.2% |
0.2317444 |
| 2 |
Generalist with little professional expertise in the ministry’s area of
responsibility |
446 |
22.6% |
0.2261663 |
| 3 |
Specialist with strong professional expertise in the organisation's area of
responsibility |
539 |
27.3% |
0.2733266 |
| 4 |
Generalist with little professional expertise in the organisation's area of
responsibility |
530 |
26.9% |
0.2687627 |
| Sysmiss |
|
234 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_arberf1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random work experience for Candidate C in [f4_wotmcx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has work experience from your ministry |
455 |
23.1% |
0.2307302 |
| 2 |
Has no work experience from your ministry |
448 |
22.7% |
0.2271805 |
| 3 |
Has work experience from your organisation |
521 |
26.4% |
0.2641988 |
| 4 |
Has no work experience from your organisation |
548 |
27.8% |
0.2778905 |
| Sysmiss |
|
234 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_arberf2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random work experience for Candidate D in [f4_wotmcx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has work experience from your ministry |
464 |
23.5% |
0.2352941 |
| 2 |
Has no work experience from your ministry |
440 |
22.3% |
0.2231237 |
| 3 |
Has work experience from your organisation |
541 |
27.4% |
0.2743408 |
| 4 |
Has no work experience from your organisation |
527 |
26.7% |
0.2672414 |
| Sysmiss |
|
234 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_person1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random personality for Candidate C in [f4_wotmcx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ambitious reformer |
618 |
31.3% |
0.3133874 |
| 2 |
Pragmatic |
647 |
32.8% |
0.3280933 |
| 3 |
Oriented towards the status quo |
707 |
35.9% |
0.3585193 |
| Sysmiss |
|
234 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_person2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random personality for Candidate D in [f4_wotmcx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ambitious reformer |
698 |
35.4% |
0.3539554 |
| 2 |
Pragmatic |
645 |
32.7% |
0.3270791 |
| 3 |
Oriented towards the status quo |
629 |
31.9% |
0.3189655 |
| Sysmiss |
|
234 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_polakt1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random political activity for Candidate C in
[f4_wotmcx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has never been active in a political party |
684 |
34.7% |
0.3468560 |
| 2 |
Has been active in a party that is currently in the government |
641 |
32.5% |
0.3250507 |
| 3 |
Has been active in a party that is not currently in the government |
647 |
32.8% |
0.3280933 |
| Sysmiss |
|
234 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_polakt2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random political activity for Candidate D in
[f4_wotmcx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has never been active in a political party |
674 |
34.2% |
0.3417850 |
| 2 |
Has been active in a party that is currently in the government |
672 |
34.1% |
0.3407708 |
| 3 |
Has been active in a party that is not currently in the government |
626 |
31.7% |
0.3174442 |
| Sysmiss |
|
234 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_karvei1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random career path for Candidate C in [f4_wotmcx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has many years of work experience from the public sector |
682 |
34.6% |
0.3458418 |
| 2 |
Has many years of experience from the private sector |
621 |
31.5% |
0.3149087 |
| 3 |
Has many years of experience from the non-profit sector |
669 |
33.9% |
0.3392495 |
| Sysmiss |
|
234 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_karvei2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sets random career path for Candidate D in [f4_wotmcx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has many years of work experience from the public sector |
672 |
34.1% |
0.3407708 |
| 2 |
Has many years of experience from the private sector |
622 |
31.5% |
0.3154158 |
| 3 |
Has many years of experience from the non-profit sector |
678 |
34.4% |
0.3438134 |
| Sysmiss |
|
234 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_rerandomize
|
Variable label:
|
Technical details of a possible rerandomization of the
f4_wotmcx2-variables.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Contains information if there was a need to rerandomize the candidates’
attributes.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:-]
|
f4_wotmcx2_roworder
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. The random order the attributes were shown in in the table
for [f4_wotmcx2]. Given sequentially, sorted by row number.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The random order the attributes were shown in in the table for
[f4_wotmcx2]. Shows the topics’ rowwise placement, sorted by topic. If
the first number is 2 it means that topic 1 (personal relationships) was
shown in row number 2, and if the the second number is 4 it means that
topic 2 (subject expertise) was shown in row number 4, etc. See
[f4_wotmcx1_roworder_seq] for the sequential order, sorted by row
number.
1 = Personal relationships. 2 = Subject expertise. 3 = Work experience.
4 = Personality. 5 = Political activity. 6 = Career path.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:-]
|
f4_wotmcx2_roworder_seq
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. The random order the attributes were shown in in the table
for [f4_wotmcx2]. Given as a topic’s rowwise placement, sorted by topic.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The random order the attributes were shown in in the table for
[f4_wotmcx2]. Shows the topics’ placement, sorted by row number. The
first number indicates what topic was shown in the first row, while the
next number shows what topic was shown in the second row, etc.
1 = Personal relationships. 2 = Subject expertise. 3 = Work experience.
4 = Personality. 5 = Political activity. 6 = Career path.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1972] [Invalid:234]
[Range:-]
|
f4_wotmcx2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I would like to work under candidate C’s management.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are two other candidates for the senior management job -
candidate C and candidate D - who stand out in the recommendation.
Carefully read the description of these two candidates and consider
the questions below.
Candidate C:
f4_wotmcx2_perfor1
f4_wotmcx2_fageks1
f4_wotmcx2_arberf1
f4_wotmcx2_person1
f4_wotmcx2_polakt1
f4_wotmcx2_karvei1
Candidate D:
f4_wotmcx2_perfor2
f4_wotmcx2_fageks2
f4_wotmcx2_arberf2
f4_wotmcx2_person2
f4_wotmcx2_polakt2
f4_wotmcx2_karvei2
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I would have liked to work under candidate C’s leadership.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Respondents were shown the candidates’ attributes in a table. The
variables were shown in a random order which can be found in
[f4_wotmcx2_roworder] and [f4_wotmcx2_roworder_seq]. Asked on the same
page as [f4_wotmcx2p].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
85 |
3.9% |
0.03853128 |
| 2 |
Agree |
410 |
18.6% |
0.18585675 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
451 |
20.4% |
0.20444243 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
491 |
22.3% |
0.22257480 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
299 |
13.6% |
0.13553944 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
131 |
5.9% |
0.05938350 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
36 |
1.6% |
0.01631913 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
303 |
13.7% |
0.13735267 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I would like to work under candidate D’s management.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are two other candidates for the senior management job -
candidate C and candidate D - who stand out in the recommendation.
Carefully read the description of these two candidates and consider
the questions below.
Candidate C:
f4_wotmcx2_perfor1
f4_wotmcx2_fageks1
f4_wotmcx2_arberf1
f4_wotmcx2_person1
f4_wotmcx2_polakt1
f4_wotmcx2_karvei1
Candidate D:
f4_wotmcx2_perfor2
f4_wotmcx2_fageks2
f4_wotmcx2_arberf2
f4_wotmcx2_person2
f4_wotmcx2_polakt2
f4_wotmcx2_karvei2
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I would have liked to work under candidate D’s leadership.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Respondents were shown the candidates’ attributes in a table. The
variables were shown in a random order which can be found in
[f4_wotmcx2_roworder] and [f4_wotmcx2_roworder_seq]. Asked on the same
page as [f4_wotmcx2p].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
74 |
3.4% |
0.03354488 |
| 2 |
Agree |
368 |
16.7% |
0.16681777 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
522 |
23.7% |
0.23662738 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
500 |
22.7% |
0.22665458 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
286 |
13.0% |
0.12964642 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
113 |
5.1% |
0.05122393 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
29 |
1.3% |
0.01314597 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
314 |
14.2% |
0.14233908 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_wotmcx2p
|
Variable label:
|
All things considered, under which candidate’s leadership would you
prefer to work?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are two other candidates for the senior management job -
candidate C and candidate D - who stand out in the recommendation.
Carefully read the description of these two candidates and consider
the questions below.
Candidate C:
f4_wotmcx2_perfor1
f4_wotmcx2_fageks1
f4_wotmcx2_arberf1
f4_wotmcx2_person1
f4_wotmcx2_polakt1
f4_wotmcx2_karvei1
Candidate D:
f4_wotmcx2_perfor2
f4_wotmcx2_fageks2
f4_wotmcx2_arberf2
f4_wotmcx2_person2
f4_wotmcx2_polakt2
f4_wotmcx2_karvei2
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, under which candidate’s leadership would you
prefer to work?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent was registered with a value in f4_P6]
[Respondents were shown the candidates’ attributes in a table. The
variables were shown in a random order which can be found in
[f4_wotmcx2_roworder] and [f4_wotmcx2_roworder_seq]. Asked on the same
page as [f4_wotmcx2].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Candidate A |
885 |
40.1% |
0.4011786 |
| 2 |
Candidate A |
948 |
43.0% |
0.4297371 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
373 |
16.9% |
0.1690843 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
f4_paedf_1
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?:
Law
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Law
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
4 |
2.6% |
0.02614379 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
128 |
83.7% |
0.83660131 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
13.7% |
0.13725490 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_paedf_2
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?:
Finance/Management
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Finance/Management
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
27 |
17.6% |
0.1764706 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
105 |
68.6% |
0.6862745 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
13.7% |
0.1372549 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_paedf_3
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?:
Political Science
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political Science
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
10 |
6.5% |
0.06535948 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
122 |
79.7% |
0.79738562 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
13.7% |
0.13725490 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_paedf_4
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?:
Other social sciences
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other social sciences
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
19 |
12.4% |
0.1241830 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
113 |
73.9% |
0.7385621 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
13.7% |
0.1372549 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_paedf_5
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?:
Medicine
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Medicine
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
12 |
7.8% |
0.07843137 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
120 |
78.4% |
0.78431373 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
13.7% |
0.13725490 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_paedf_6
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?:
Science/Engineering
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Science/Engineering
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
47 |
30.7% |
0.3071895 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
85 |
55.6% |
0.5555556 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
13.7% |
0.1372549 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_paedf_7
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?:
The humanities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The humanities
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
7 |
4.6% |
0.04575163 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
125 |
81.7% |
0.81699346 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
13.7% |
0.13725490 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_paedf_8
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?:
Journalism/communication
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Journalism/communication
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
2 |
1.3% |
0.0130719 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
130 |
85.0% |
0.8496732 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
13.7% |
0.1372549 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_paedf_9
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?:
Information technology (IT)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Information technology (IT)
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
7 |
4.6% |
0.04575163 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
125 |
81.7% |
0.81699346 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
13.7% |
0.13725490 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_paedf_10
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?:
Other (please specify)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other (please specify)
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
19 |
12.4% |
0.1241830 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
113 |
73.9% |
0.7385621 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
13.7% |
0.1372549 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_paedf_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?:
Other (please specify)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other (please specify)
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:2206] [Range:-]
|
f4_pasnr_1
|
Variable label:
|
How many years have you worked in: your current position?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How many years have you worked in…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…your current position?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than 1 year |
9 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
| 2 |
1 - 5 years |
55 |
35.9% |
0.35947712 |
| 3 |
6 – 10 years |
25 |
16.3% |
0.16339869 |
| 4 |
11 – 20 years |
26 |
17.0% |
0.16993464 |
| 5 |
More than enn 20 years |
16 |
10.5% |
0.10457516 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
14.4% |
0.14379085 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_pasnr_2
|
Variable label:
|
How many years have you worked in: central government
(ministry/directorate/inspection authority etc.)?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How many years have you worked in…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…central government (ministry/directorate/inspection authority etc.)?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (rekruttert = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than 1 year |
6 |
3.9% |
0.03921569 |
| 2 |
1 - 5 years |
41 |
26.8% |
0.26797386 |
| 3 |
6 – 10 years |
20 |
13.1% |
0.13071895 |
| 4 |
11 – 20 years |
37 |
24.2% |
0.24183007 |
| 5 |
More than enn 20 years |
24 |
15.7% |
0.15686275 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
16.3% |
0.16339869 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2053 |
|
NA |
f4_avslutt
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Feedback regarding the survey.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2206]
[Range:-]
|
f4_P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1016 |
46.1% |
0.46056210 |
| 2 |
Female |
1108 |
50.2% |
0.50226655 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
82 |
3.7% |
0.03717135 |
f4_P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
943 |
42.7% |
0.42747053 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
623 |
28.2% |
0.28241160 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
29 |
1.3% |
0.01314597 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
200 |
9.1% |
0.09066183 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
33 |
1.5% |
0.01495920 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
71 |
3.2% |
0.03218495 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
307 |
13.9% |
0.13916591 |
f4_P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:3-54]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
943 |
42.7% |
0.427470535 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
56 |
2.5% |
0.025385313 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
25 |
1.1% |
0.011332729 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
21 |
1.0% |
0.009519492 |
| 30 |
Viken |
505 |
22.9% |
0.228921124 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
42 |
1.9% |
0.019038985 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
76 |
3.4% |
0.034451496 |
| 42 |
Agder |
29 |
1.3% |
0.013145966 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
119 |
5.4% |
0.053943790 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
33 |
1.5% |
0.014959202 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
50 |
2.3% |
0.022665458 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
307 |
13.9% |
0.139165911 |
f4_P3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Election district
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus |
431 |
19.5% |
0.195376247 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
943 |
42.7% |
0.427470535 |
| 3 |
Østfold |
51 |
2.3% |
0.023118767 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
71 |
3.2% |
0.032184950 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
30 |
1.4% |
0.013599275 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005439710 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
23 |
1.0% |
0.010426111 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002266546 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005439710 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
17 |
0.8% |
0.007706256 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
56 |
2.5% |
0.025385313 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
72 |
3.3% |
0.032638259 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
47 |
2.1% |
0.021305530 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
25 |
1.1% |
0.011332729 |
| 15 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002719855 |
| 16 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
27 |
1.2% |
0.012239347 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
21 |
1.0% |
0.009519492 |
| 18 |
Troms og Finnmark |
38 |
1.7% |
0.017225748 |
| 19 |
Finnmark |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005439710 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
307 |
13.9% |
0.139165911 |
f4_P3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Region (trichotomy)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
943 |
42.7% |
0.4274705 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
623 |
28.2% |
0.2824116 |
| 3 |
The rest of the country |
333 |
15.1% |
0.1509519 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
307 |
13.9% |
0.1391659 |
f4_P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education (condensed)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001461276 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
90 |
4.4% |
0.043838285 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
1873 |
91.2% |
0.912323429 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
4.2% |
0.042377009 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
153 |
|
NA |
f4_P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (expanded)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
243 |
11.0% |
0.11015413 |
| 2 |
1960-1969 |
721 |
32.7% |
0.32683590 |
| 3 |
1970-1979 |
609 |
27.6% |
0.27606528 |
| 4 |
1980-1989 |
323 |
14.6% |
0.14641886 |
| 5 |
1990 or later |
154 |
7.0% |
0.06980961 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
156 |
7.1% |
0.07071623 |
f4_P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (condensed)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
243 |
11.0% |
0.11015413 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
1653 |
74.9% |
0.74932004 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
154 |
7.0% |
0.06980961 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
156 |
7.1% |
0.07071623 |
f4_P6
|
Variable label:
|
Administrative level
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2023 - 05.12.2023
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ministry |
986 |
44.7% |
0.4469628 |
| 2 |
Directorate |
1220 |
55.3% |
0.5530372 |
| 3 |
Municipality / County municipality |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 4 |
Other |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f4_tvcpa
|
Variable label:
|
Currently a public administrator in the central government
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain respondents were after the field period and data delivery
discovered as not fitting into the defined target population. That is,
not working in public administration in the central government
(ministries, directorates, and supervisory authorities). We therefore
recommend excluding these respondents when conducting analyses. For more
information on the exclusion process and -criteria, please refer to the
documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2206] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not currently a public administrator in the central government |
37 |
1.7% |
0.01677244 |
| 1 |
Currently a public administrator in the central government |
2169 |
98.3% |
0.98322756 |
