Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen (UiB)
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
Coordinator, UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Sveinung Arnesen
|
NORCE
|
|
Susanne Bygnes
|
UiB
|
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
UiB
|
|
Nina Serdarevic
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
|
Arjan Schakel
|
UiB
|
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
|
Kristine Bærøe
|
UiB
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project Team Member
|
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project Team Member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality Assurance
|
Study description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company Ideas 2 Evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates is
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic Coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of Analysis:
Individual
Universe: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology - Data Collection
Sampling Procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in five
waves, wave 1, wave 3, wave 8, wave 11 and wave 14. In wave 1, 4.870
panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3,
5.623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8,
4245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave
11, 2069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11).
In wave 14, 2036 panel members were recruited (see documentation from
wave 14).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure
of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000
individuals. In wave 11, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people
was drawn. Equally, in wave 14, a gross sample of 14 000 people was
drawn.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
14 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the
register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c)
address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded
people with no current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment. Please refer to the Documentation Report from Wave 14. The
report is available here:
http://digsscore.uib.no/download-data-and-documentation
In wave 15, emails were sent out on May 21st, 2019.
E-mail with reminder was sent out three times, May 29th, June 9th and
June 7th, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the
survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with
registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message.
Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by e-mail.
Wave 15 ended June 10th.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights,
the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender
and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in
the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register.
Information regarding the level of education is provided by the
respondents when answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 15
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r15Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r15Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r15Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-102
|
2023-10-25
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 15
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 15
|
|
NA
|
2019-12-10
|
r15km_a_open
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-12-10
|
r15arbeidolje1
|
Updated conditions and missing values.
|
|
NA
|
2019-12-10
|
r15_arbeidolje2
|
Updated conditions and missing values.
|
|
NA
|
2019-12-10
|
r15arbeidolje_2b
|
Updated conditions and missing values.
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-15
|
r15helse6
|
Flipped answer scale (0 - 100, 100 - 0). Added value labels on end
points.
|
|
v-100
|
2019-06-21
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 15
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 15 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
8105
|
|
# Variables
|
352
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15group
|
Variable label:
|
[Subgroup in wave 15. Randomized ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Subgroup in wave 15. Randomized ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
g1 |
1375 |
17.0% |
0.1696484 |
| 2 |
g2 |
1317 |
16.2% |
0.1624923 |
| 3 |
g3 |
1336 |
16.5% |
0.1648365 |
| 4 |
g4 |
1347 |
16.6% |
0.1661937 |
| 5 |
g5 |
1360 |
16.8% |
0.1677977 |
| 6 |
g6 |
1370 |
16.9% |
0.1690315 |
r15rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-14]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
1743 |
21.5% |
0.2150524 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
1892 |
23.3% |
0.2334362 |
| 8 |
Wave 8 |
1864 |
23.0% |
0.2299815 |
| 11 |
Wave 11 |
1180 |
14.6% |
0.1455891 |
| 14 |
Wave 14 |
1426 |
17.6% |
0.1759408 |
r15browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
4924 |
60.8% |
0.6075262 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
3181 |
39.2% |
0.3924738 |
r15opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
5034 |
62.1% |
0.621098088 |
| 2 |
Touch |
3047 |
37.6% |
0.375940777 |
| 3 |
Generisk |
24 |
0.3% |
0.002961135 |
r15advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15padper14
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The municipality should finance hot lunches in
kindergarten.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian municipalities should finance hot lunch every day to children
in kindergartens.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
178 |
12.9% |
0.129454545 |
| 2 |
Agree |
282 |
20.5% |
0.205090909 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
303 |
22.0% |
0.220363636 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
217 |
15.8% |
0.157818182 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
146 |
10.6% |
0.106181818 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
198 |
14.4% |
0.144000000 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
3.6% |
0.035636364 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001454545 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Prioritize spending on: Higher education.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Political decisions can be costly to implement, and it is often not
possible to prioritize all decisions equally even if they are considered
important.
What do you think the government should do with regard to the following
issues:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Higher education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Spend a lot more money |
52 |
3.8% |
0.037818182 |
| 2 |
Spend more money |
340 |
24.7% |
0.247272727 |
| 3 |
Spend a little more money |
381 |
27.7% |
0.277090909 |
| 4 |
Spend as much money as now |
511 |
37.2% |
0.371636364 |
| 5 |
Spend a little less money |
58 |
4.2% |
0.042181818 |
| 6 |
Spend less money |
14 |
1.0% |
0.010181818 |
| 7 |
Spend a lot less money |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003636364 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.0% |
0.010181818 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Prioritize spending on: Unemployment benefits.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Political decisions can be costly to implement, and it is often not
possible to prioritize all decisions equally even if they are considered
important.
What do you think the government should do with regard to the following
issues:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefits
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Spend a lot more money |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02327273 |
| 2 |
Spend more money |
174 |
12.7% |
0.12654545 |
| 3 |
Spend a little more money |
264 |
19.2% |
0.19200000 |
| 4 |
Spend as much money as now |
623 |
45.3% |
0.45309091 |
| 5 |
Spend a little less money |
193 |
14.0% |
0.14036364 |
| 6 |
Spend less money |
58 |
4.2% |
0.04218182 |
| 7 |
Spend a lot less money |
11 |
0.8% |
0.00800000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.5% |
0.01454545 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Prioritize spending on: Retirement pensions.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Political decisions can be costly to implement, and it is often not
possible to prioritize all decisions equally even if they are considered
important.
What do you think the government should do with regard to the following
issues:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Retirement pensions
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Spend a lot more money |
154 |
11.2% |
0.112000000 |
| 2 |
Spend more money |
372 |
27.1% |
0.270545455 |
| 3 |
Spend a little more money |
422 |
30.7% |
0.306909091 |
| 4 |
Spend as much money as now |
361 |
26.3% |
0.262545455 |
| 5 |
Spend a little less money |
39 |
2.8% |
0.028363636 |
| 6 |
Spend less money |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008000000 |
| 7 |
Spend a lot less money |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003636364 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper2_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important issue for you: Higher education.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are these issues for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Higher education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
303 |
22.0% |
0.22036364 |
| 2 |
Important |
660 |
48.0% |
0.48000000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
278 |
20.2% |
0.20218182 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
84 |
6.1% |
0.06109091 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
31 |
2.3% |
0.02254545 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.4% |
0.01381818 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper2_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important issue for you: Unemployment benefits.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are these issues for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefits
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
110 |
8.0% |
0.08000000 |
| 2 |
Important |
464 |
33.7% |
0.33745455 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
471 |
34.3% |
0.34254545 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
238 |
17.3% |
0.17309091 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
68 |
4.9% |
0.04945455 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.7% |
0.01745455 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper2_3
|
Variable label:
|
How important issue for you: Retirement pensions.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are these issues for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Retirement pensions
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
440 |
32.0% |
0.320000000 |
| 2 |
Important |
651 |
47.3% |
0.473454545 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
237 |
17.2% |
0.172363636 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
33 |
2.4% |
0.024000000 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005090909 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005090909 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper9
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The number of municipalities should be reduced further
through merging.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
From the year 2020, Norway will have 356 municipalities instead of 422
as of today. The number of municipalities should be reduced further by
more mergers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
211 |
15.3% |
0.153454545 |
| 2 |
Agree |
240 |
17.5% |
0.174545455 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
266 |
19.3% |
0.193454545 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
197 |
14.3% |
0.143272727 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
148 |
10.8% |
0.107636364 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
186 |
13.5% |
0.135272727 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
122 |
8.9% |
0.088727273 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003636364 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper10
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Meat- and dairy production should be halved by 2050.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Research suggests that livestock husbandry may be negative for the
environment. Meanwhile, meat and dairy products are an important source
of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should halve today’s meat and dairy production by 2050.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
55 |
4.0% |
0.040000000 |
| 2 |
Agree |
123 |
8.9% |
0.089454545 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
185 |
13.5% |
0.134545455 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
154 |
11.2% |
0.112000000 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
207 |
15.1% |
0.150545455 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
367 |
26.7% |
0.266909091 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
279 |
20.3% |
0.202909091 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003636364 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper11
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The government should work to reduce wealth differences.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government should work to reduce the wealth differences in society
to a greater extent.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
336 |
24.4% |
0.244363636 |
| 2 |
Agree |
352 |
25.6% |
0.256000000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
283 |
20.6% |
0.205818182 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
155 |
11.3% |
0.112727273 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
104 |
7.6% |
0.075636364 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
107 |
7.8% |
0.077818182 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
32 |
2.3% |
0.023272727 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004363636 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper13
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norwegian municipalities should not have property taxes.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian municipalities should not have property taxes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
334 |
24.3% |
0.242909091 |
| 2 |
Agree |
249 |
18.1% |
0.181090909 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
169 |
12.3% |
0.122909091 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
196 |
14.3% |
0.142545455 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
183 |
13.3% |
0.133090909 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
170 |
12.4% |
0.123636364 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
66 |
4.8% |
0.048000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005818182 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper15_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15padper15.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15padper15.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1373] [Invalid:6732]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
a neutral life-stance humanist school. The school should be an ordinary
Norwegian school that follows the national competence goals, and in addition
teaches humanistic values. |
314 |
22.9% |
0.2286963 |
| 2 |
a Muslim school. The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that follows
the national competence goals, and in addition teaches Islam. |
374 |
27.2% |
0.2723962 |
| 3 |
a Christian school. The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that
follows the national competence goals, and in addition teaches Christianity |
352 |
25.6% |
0.2563729 |
| 4 |
a Jewish school. The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that follows
the national competence goals, and in addition teaches Judaism. |
333 |
24.3% |
0.2425346 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6732 |
|
NA |
r15padper15_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15padper15.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15padper15.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1373] [Invalid:6732]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
303 |
22.1% |
0.2206846 |
| 2 |
, but 42% of all residents of the municipality are against the school |
365 |
26.6% |
0.2658412 |
| 3 |
, but 52% of all residents of the municipality are against the school |
349 |
25.4% |
0.2541879 |
| 4 |
, but 62% of all residents of the municipality are against the school |
356 |
25.9% |
0.2592862 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6732 |
|
NA |
r15padper15_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15padper15.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15padper15.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1373] [Invalid:6732]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
343 |
25.0% |
0.2498179 |
| 2 |
Some experts believe that such a school hinders social mobility. |
333 |
24.3% |
0.2425346 |
| 3 |
Some experts believe that the application is authorised by law. |
370 |
26.9% |
0.2694829 |
| 4 |
Some experts believe that faith-based schools are in line with religious
freedom. |
327 |
23.8% |
0.2381646 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6732 |
|
NA |
r15padper15
|
Variable label:
|
Municipality should support or oppose an application for a belief based
school.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that there is an application to the Norwegian Directorate of
Education and Training to start [a neutral life-stance humanist school.
The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that follows the
national competence goals, and in addition teaches humanistic values./a
Muslim school. The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that
follows the national competence goals, and in addition teaches Islam./a
Christian school. The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that
follows the national competence goals, and in addition teaches
Christianity./a Jewish school. The school should be an ordinary
Norwegian school that follows the national competence goals, and in
addition teaches Judaism.]
It seems that there is sufficient demand for this type of school in
the municipality where the school will be built [ /, but 42% of all
residents of the municipality are against the school/, but 52% of all
residents of the municipality are against the school/, but 62% of all
residents of the municipality are against the school]
[/Some experts believe that such a school hinders social mobility/Some
experts believe that the application is authorised by law./Some experts
believe that faith-based schools are in line with religious freedom.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, should the municipal council support or protest against
this application to the Directorate of Education and Training?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. Experiment. The question text depends on the
values in r15padper15_ran1, r15padper15_ran2 and r15padper15_ran3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The municipality should support the proposal |
547 |
39.8% |
0.39781818 |
| 2 |
The municipality should object to the proposal |
807 |
58.7% |
0.58690909 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.5% |
0.01527273 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15km_nato
|
Variable label:
|
Norway should or should not continue to be a member of NATO.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to your point of view:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway should continue to be a member of NATO. |
1234 |
93.7% |
0.936977980 |
| 2 |
Norway should opt out of NATO. |
72 |
5.5% |
0.054669704 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008352316 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km_nato_open
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R15KM_NATO]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have additional comments, please write them here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15dvby3
|
Variable label:
|
How afraid of a new terrorist attack in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
61 |
4.6% |
0.046317388 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
236 |
17.9% |
0.179195140 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
617 |
46.8% |
0.468488990 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
367 |
27.9% |
0.278663629 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
32 |
2.4% |
0.024297646 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003037206 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km66_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15km66.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects
value for r15km66.]
1 = “Production of oil and gas is an important industry for Norway. The
industry provides many jobs and considerable income for society. At the
same time, burning fossil energy is the main cause of climate change and
activities on the Norwegian continental shelf contribute about 1/4 of
Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. Opening new areas is also
controversial because it can affect life in the sea and at the ice edge.
The political parties have different opinions about how the petroleum
industry should be developed over the next 20 to 30 years. There is
disagreement over both how large the industry should be and whether new
areas should be opened.” 2 = “The political parties have different
opinions about how the petroleum industry should be developed over the
next 20 to 30 years. There is disagreement over how large the industry
should be and whether new areas should be opened.”
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1315] [Invalid:6790]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Production of oil and gas is an important industry for Norway.[...] [See
interview instructions in codebook for full text] |
673 |
51.2% |
0.5117871 |
| 2 |
The political parties have different opinions about how the petroleum industry
should be developed over the next 20 to 30 years. [...] [See interviewer
instructions in codebook for full text]] |
642 |
48.8% |
0.4882129 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6790 |
|
NA |
r15km66_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 2. Background variable. Specifies the
direction (order) of the response options to r15km66. The direction is
randomized.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 2. Background variable. Specifies the
direction (order) of the response options to r15km66. The direction is
randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1315] [Invalid:6790]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Normal |
646 |
49.1% |
0.4912548 |
| 2 |
Reversed |
669 |
50.9% |
0.5087452 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6790 |
|
NA |
r15km66
|
Variable label:
|
Discontinue/continue the oil industry. Answer list order randomized.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Production of oil and gas is an important industry for Norway. The
industry provides many jobs and considerable income for society. At the
same time, burning fossil energy is the main cause of climate change and
activities on the Norwegian continental shelf contribute about 1/4 of
Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. Opening new areas is also
controversial because it can affect life in the sea and at the ice edge.
/The political parties have different opinions about how the petroleum
industry should be developed over the next 20 to 30 years. There is
disagreement over both how large the industry should be and whether new
areas should be opened.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to your view?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. The wording of the question depends on the
randomized value in r15km66_ran. The order of the response options is
randomized. See r15km66_ran2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be as developed as possible. We should
open up to new search areas and if possible facilitate further growth. |
82 |
6.2% |
0.062262718 |
| 2 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be as developed as it is today. We should
make environmental considerations like we do today, and open up new search areas
where environmentally justifiable, while encouraging to maintain the industry. |
422 |
32.0% |
0.320425209 |
| 3 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be less developed than today. We should
therefore not open up new areas, and searches should be limited to areas where
activity has already been established. |
374 |
28.4% |
0.283978740 |
| 4 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be considerably less developed than
today. We should therefore not allow searches for new resources, and we should
only permit production in existing fields until they have been depleted. |
312 |
23.7% |
0.236902050 |
| 5 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be discontinued. We should therefore
not allow searches for new fields. The production in existing fields should be
reduced considerably within the next 5 years and closed down within the course
of the time period. |
119 |
9.0% |
0.090356872 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.006074412 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15kmmot
|
Variable label:
|
Have you changed your way of living because of climate change.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In previous surveys, we have seen that many Norwegian citizens are
willing to change their way of life to limit harmful climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you changed your way of life to help limit harmful climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 and r15kmmot = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, a lot |
114 |
8.7% |
0.086560364 |
| 2 |
Yes, a little |
955 |
72.5% |
0.725132878 |
| 3 |
No |
242 |
18.4% |
0.183750949 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.004555809 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15kmmot_open
|
Variable label:
|
Open, motivation for [R15KMMOT] if yes. [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to tell us what has motivated you to change your way
of life.
|
|
Post-question:
|
All replies would be welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just
a few words if you would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 and r15kmmot = 1 or 2. ] [Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15kmmot_open2
|
Variable label:
|
Open, motivation for [R15KMMOT] if no. [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to tell us what has motivated you to change your way
of life.
|
|
Post-question:
|
All replies would be welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just
a few words if you would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 and r15kmmot = 3. ] [Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15km_a
|
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCC’s report on the consequences of global warming.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC is an
international working group of scientists who regularly publish reports
to summarize scientific assessment on climate change. In October 2018,
they published a special report on the impact of global warming
exceeding 1.5 degrees.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard about this report?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
982 |
74.6% |
0.745634017 |
| 2 |
No |
327 |
24.8% |
0.248291572 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.006074412 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km_a_open
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R15KM_a]: What have you learned from or about the report [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What have you learned from or about this report?
|
|
Post-question:
|
All replies would be welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just
a few words if you prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 and r15km_a = 1. ] [Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15km_b
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: Radical action against climate change.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In many parts of the world, groups of citizens have been engaging in
various forms of civil disobedience and protest with the aim of
pressuring their governments and leaders to take more drastic measures
against climate change and carbon emissions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you support or oppose people engaging in non-violent
civil disobedience and protests to pressure government representatives
to act against climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly oppose |
37 |
2.8% |
0.028094153 |
| 2 |
Oppose |
62 |
4.7% |
0.047076689 |
| 3 |
Somewhat oppose |
105 |
8.0% |
0.079726651 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
248 |
18.8% |
0.188306758 |
| 5 |
Somewhat support |
291 |
22.1% |
0.220956720 |
| 6 |
Support |
364 |
27.6% |
0.276385725 |
| 7 |
Strongly support |
202 |
15.3% |
0.153378891 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.006074412 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km_b2
|
Variable label:
|
How likely to participate in radical action against climate change next
12 months.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely would you be, over the next 12 months, to participate in a
protest for increased action by the government against climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not likely at all |
392 |
29.8% |
0.297646166 |
| 2 |
Not likely |
556 |
42.2% |
0.422171602 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
235 |
17.8% |
0.178435839 |
| 4 |
Likely |
91 |
6.9% |
0.069096431 |
| 5 |
Very likely |
37 |
2.8% |
0.028094153 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.004555809 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km_c_1
|
Variable label:
|
For/against climate action: Public money to renewable energy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Various policies might be used to reduce climate change or deal with its
effects. To what extent do you support or oppose the following policies
in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Using public money to extend renewable energy, such as wind and solar
power.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly oppose |
40 |
3.0% |
0.030372058 |
| 2 |
Oppose |
37 |
2.8% |
0.028094153 |
| 3 |
Somewhat oppose |
49 |
3.7% |
0.037205771 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
82 |
6.2% |
0.062262718 |
| 5 |
Somewhat support |
258 |
19.6% |
0.195899772 |
| 6 |
Support |
531 |
40.3% |
0.403189066 |
| 7 |
Strongly support |
308 |
23.4% |
0.233864844 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.009111617 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km_c_2
|
Variable label:
|
For/against climate action: Law demanding money from frequent flyers.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Various policies might be used to reduce climate change or deal with its
effects. To what extent do you support or oppose the following policies
in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
A law requiring additional charges on people who fly more than twice a
year (a ‘frequent flyer levy’).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly oppose |
206 |
15.6% |
0.156416097 |
| 2 |
Oppose |
248 |
18.8% |
0.188306758 |
| 3 |
Somewhat oppose |
129 |
9.8% |
0.097949886 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
182 |
13.8% |
0.138192863 |
| 5 |
Somewhat support |
221 |
16.8% |
0.167805619 |
| 6 |
Support |
194 |
14.7% |
0.147304480 |
| 7 |
Strongly support |
127 |
9.6% |
0.096431283 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.8% |
0.007593014 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km_c_3
|
Variable label:
|
For/against climate action: Carbon tax on high-emission food items.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Various policies might be used to reduce climate change or deal with its
effects. To what extent do you support or oppose the following policies
in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
A carbon tax on food items with high emissions, such as beef and dairy
products.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly oppose |
258 |
19.6% |
0.195899772 |
| 2 |
Oppose |
288 |
21.9% |
0.218678815 |
| 3 |
Somewhat oppose |
169 |
12.8% |
0.128321944 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
170 |
12.9% |
0.129081245 |
| 5 |
Somewhat support |
199 |
15.1% |
0.151100987 |
| 6 |
Support |
147 |
11.2% |
0.111617312 |
| 7 |
Strongly support |
76 |
5.8% |
0.057706910 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.8% |
0.007593014 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15meme1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What do you think is required for a person to be counted as a
Norwegian. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, what should a person have in place before they can be
regarded as Norwegian?
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can write as much or as little as you want, preferably a few
sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15meme2
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative to dual citizenship in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion regarding the possibility of dual citizenship in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
146 |
10.9% |
0.109281437 |
| 2 |
Positive |
348 |
26.0% |
0.260479042 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
164 |
12.3% |
0.122754491 |
| 4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
323 |
24.2% |
0.241766467 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
159 |
11.9% |
0.119011976 |
| 6 |
Negative |
114 |
8.5% |
0.085329341 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
77 |
5.8% |
0.057634731 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003742515 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme3
|
Variable label:
|
Dual citizenship applicable to you or your close family.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is dual citizenship applicable to you or someone in your immediate
family?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, for myself and someone in my family |
79 |
5.9% |
0.059131737 |
| 2 |
Yes, for myself |
30 |
2.2% |
0.022455090 |
| 3 |
Yes, for someone in my family |
232 |
17.4% |
0.173652695 |
| 4 |
No |
988 |
74.0% |
0.739520958 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005239521 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme4
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: Change that one parent must be a citizen for a child to
become citizen at birth.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In order for a child to become a Norwegian citizen at birth, one parent
must be a Norwegian citizen. Do you think this arrangement should be
changed so that one automatically becomes a Norwegian citizen at birth,
or should the current arrangement be maintained?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly support to change the arrangement |
89 |
6.7% |
0.06661677 |
| 2 |
Somewhat support to change the arrangement |
284 |
21.3% |
0.21257485 |
| 3 |
Somewhat support to maintain the arrangement |
412 |
30.8% |
0.30838323 |
| 4 |
Strongly support to maintain the arrangement |
535 |
40.0% |
0.40044910 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01197605 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme5
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: Change that non-citizens can vote at local elections.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Presently, one can vote in local and county council elections even if
you are not a Norwegian citizen. Do you think this arrangement should be
changed so that one must be a Norwegian citizen to vote in local
elections, or should the current arrangement be maintained?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly support to change the arrangement |
329 |
24.6% |
0.24625749 |
| 2 |
Somewhat support to change the arrangement |
244 |
18.3% |
0.18263473 |
| 3 |
Somewhat support to maintain the arrangement |
350 |
26.2% |
0.26197605 |
| 4 |
Strongly support to maintain the arrangement |
396 |
29.6% |
0.29640719 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.3% |
0.01272455 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme6a_1
|
Variable label:
|
I consider myself: Norwegian.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public statistics, legislation and social debate provide several
different definitions of what it means to be Norwegian and what it means
to be an immigrant in Norway. Here are some questions about how you see
yourself and how you experience being seen by others regarding this. It
is possible to tick more than one alternative.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I think of myself as:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian |
1263 |
94.5% |
0.945359281 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
71 |
5.3% |
0.053143713 |
r15meme6a_2
|
Variable label:
|
I consider myself: Immigrant to Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public statistics, legislation and social debate provide several
different definitions of what it means to be Norwegian and what it means
to be an immigrant in Norway. Here are some questions about how you see
yourself and how you experience being seen by others regarding this. It
is possible to tick more than one alternative.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I think of myself as:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
An immigrant in Norway |
64 |
4.8% |
0.047904192 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1270 |
95.1% |
0.950598802 |
r15meme6a_3
|
Variable label:
|
I consider myself: Other.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public statistics, legislation and social debate provide several
different definitions of what it means to be Norwegian and what it means
to be an immigrant in Norway. Here are some questions about how you see
yourself and how you experience being seen by others regarding this. It
is possible to tick more than one alternative.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I think of myself as:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other: |
34 |
2.5% |
0.025449102 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1300 |
97.3% |
0.973053892 |
r15meme6a_3_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R15MEME6A_3].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public statistics, legislation and social debate provide several
different definitions of what it means to be Norwegian and what it means
to be an immigrant in Norway. Here are some questions about how you see
yourself and how you experience being seen by others regarding this. It
is possible to tick more than one alternative.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I think of myself as:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15meme6b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Others percieve me as: Norwegian.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other people perceive me as:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian |
1260 |
94.3% |
0.943113772 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
74 |
5.5% |
0.055389222 |
r15meme6b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Others percieve me as: Immigrant to Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other people perceive me as:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
An immigrant in Norway |
68 |
5.1% |
0.050898204 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1266 |
94.8% |
0.947604790 |
r15meme6b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Others percieve me as: Other.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other people perceive me as:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other: |
30 |
2.2% |
0.022455090 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1304 |
97.6% |
0.976047904 |
r15meme6b_3_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R15MEME6B_3].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other people perceive me as:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15meme6c_1
|
Variable label:
|
I prefer to be perceived as: Norwegian.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I prefer to be perceived by other people as:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian |
1235 |
92.4% |
0.924401198 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
99 |
7.4% |
0.074101796 |
r15meme6c_2
|
Variable label:
|
I prefer to be perceived as: Immigrant to Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I prefer to be perceived by other people as:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
An immigrant in Norway |
43 |
3.2% |
0.032185629 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1291 |
96.6% |
0.966317365 |
r15meme6c_3
|
Variable label:
|
I prefer to be perceived as: Other.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I prefer to be perceived by other people as:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other: |
68 |
5.1% |
0.050898204 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1266 |
94.8% |
0.947604790 |
r15meme6c_3_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R15MEME6C_3].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
I prefer to be perceived by other people as:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15meme7_a_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15meme7_a. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15meme7_a. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1334] [Invalid:6771]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
respected |
421 |
31.6% |
0.3155922 |
| 2 |
supported |
466 |
34.9% |
0.3493253 |
| 3 |
preserved |
447 |
33.5% |
0.3350825 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6771 |
|
NA |
r15meme7_a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Muslims in Norway have the right to have culture and
tradition [respected/supported/preserved].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims in Norway have the right to have their cultures and traditions
[respected/supported/preserved].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on the values of r15meme7_a_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
123 |
9.2% |
0.092065868 |
| 2 |
Agree |
297 |
22.2% |
0.222305389 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
351 |
26.3% |
0.262724551 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
113 |
8.5% |
0.084580838 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
191 |
14.3% |
0.142964072 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
138 |
10.3% |
0.103293413 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
115 |
8.6% |
0.086077844 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005988024 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme7_b_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15meme7_b. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15meme7_b. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1334] [Invalid:6771]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
New school textbooks should be added |
268 |
20.1% |
0.2008996 |
| 2 |
school textbooks should be broadened |
264 |
19.8% |
0.1979010 |
| 3 |
school textbooks should be updated |
269 |
20.2% |
0.2016492 |
| 4 |
school textbooks should be changed |
242 |
18.1% |
0.1814093 |
| 5 |
school textbooks should be written |
291 |
21.8% |
0.2181409 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6771 |
|
NA |
r15meme7_b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: School books should be
[added/broadened/updated/changed/written] to reflect religious
diversity.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
[New school textbooks should be added/school textbooks should be
broadened/school textbooks should be updated/school textbooks should be
changed/school textbooks should be written] to reflect the new cultural
and religious diversity in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on the values of r15meme7_b_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
173 |
12.9% |
0.129491018 |
| 2 |
Agree |
388 |
29.0% |
0.290419162 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
303 |
22.7% |
0.226796407 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
117 |
8.8% |
0.087574850 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
126 |
9.4% |
0.094311377 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
127 |
9.5% |
0.095059880 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
94 |
7.0% |
0.070359281 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005988024 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme8_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15meme8. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15meme8. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1334] [Invalid:6771]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
should |
690 |
51.7% |
0.5172414 |
| 2 |
should be allowed to |
644 |
48.3% |
0.4827586 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6771 |
|
NA |
r15meme8_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15meme8. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15meme8. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1334] [Invalid:6771]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Christianity |
458 |
34.3% |
0.3433283 |
| 2 |
Islam |
454 |
34.0% |
0.3403298 |
| 3 |
Christianity, Islam and other religions |
422 |
31.6% |
0.3163418 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6771 |
|
NA |
r15meme8
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Schools [should/should be allowed to] teach
[Christianity/Islam/Christianity, Islam, and other religions].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Schools [should/should be allowed to] teach students about the history
of and some of the ideas within [Christianity/Islam/Christianity, Islam
and other religions].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on the values of r15meme7_b_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
343 |
25.7% |
0.256736527 |
| 2 |
Agree |
523 |
39.1% |
0.391467066 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
229 |
17.1% |
0.171407186 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
85 |
6.4% |
0.063622754 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
66 |
4.9% |
0.049401198 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
49 |
3.7% |
0.036676647 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
34 |
2.5% |
0.025449102 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005239521 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Swedes.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like
or dislike each group:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Swedes
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002245509 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002994012 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006736527 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
586 |
43.9% |
0.438622754 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
150 |
11.2% |
0.112275449 |
| 6 |
Really like |
386 |
28.9% |
0.288922156 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
161 |
12.1% |
0.120508982 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.8% |
0.027694611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Muslims.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like
or dislike each group:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
67 |
5.0% |
0.05014970 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
79 |
5.9% |
0.05913174 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
197 |
14.7% |
0.14745509 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
628 |
47.0% |
0.47005988 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
135 |
10.1% |
0.10104790 |
| 6 |
Really like |
144 |
10.8% |
0.10778443 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
49 |
3.7% |
0.03667665 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.8% |
0.02769461 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Christians.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like
or dislike each group:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Christians
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002994012 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
14 |
1.0% |
0.010479042 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
77 |
5.8% |
0.057634731 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
631 |
47.2% |
0.472305389 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
168 |
12.6% |
0.125748503 |
| 6 |
Really like |
281 |
21.0% |
0.210329341 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
121 |
9.1% |
0.090568862 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
3.0% |
0.029940120 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Immigrants.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like
or dislike each group:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrants
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
15 |
1.1% |
0.01122754 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
24 |
1.8% |
0.01796407 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
112 |
8.4% |
0.08383234 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
689 |
51.6% |
0.51571856 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
180 |
13.5% |
0.13473054 |
| 6 |
Really like |
231 |
17.3% |
0.17290419 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
50 |
3.7% |
0.03742515 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
2.6% |
0.02619760 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Jews.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like
or dislike each group:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Jews
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008233533 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
17 |
1.3% |
0.012724551 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
58 |
4.3% |
0.043413174 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
751 |
56.2% |
0.562125749 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
146 |
10.9% |
0.109281437 |
| 6 |
Really like |
230 |
17.2% |
0.172155689 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
83 |
6.2% |
0.062125749 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
3.0% |
0.029940120 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Syrians.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like
or dislike each group:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Syrians
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
29 |
2.2% |
0.02170659 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
39 |
2.9% |
0.02919162 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
113 |
8.5% |
0.08458084 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
738 |
55.2% |
0.55239521 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
135 |
10.1% |
0.10104790 |
| 6 |
Really like |
188 |
14.1% |
0.14071856 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
54 |
4.0% |
0.04041916 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
3.0% |
0.02994012 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Afghans.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like
or dislike each group:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Afghans
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
40 |
3.0% |
0.02994012 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
40 |
3.0% |
0.02994012 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
117 |
8.8% |
0.08757485 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
758 |
56.7% |
0.56736527 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
124 |
9.3% |
0.09281437 |
| 6 |
Really like |
166 |
12.4% |
0.12425150 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
52 |
3.9% |
0.03892216 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
39 |
2.9% |
0.02919162 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10b
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R15MEME10A]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please write any comments you have about the previous question here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15meme9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Important to be unprejudiced about muslims.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to
muslims
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
223 |
16.7% |
0.16691617 |
| 2 |
Good |
429 |
32.1% |
0.32110778 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
192 |
14.4% |
0.14371257 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
311 |
23.3% |
0.23278443 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
81 |
6.1% |
0.06062874 |
| 6 |
Bad |
42 |
3.1% |
0.03143713 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
21 |
1.6% |
0.01571856 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.8% |
0.02769461 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Feel guilt if I think negatively about muslims.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about muslims
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
72 |
5.4% |
0.05389222 |
| 2 |
Good |
182 |
13.6% |
0.13622754 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
163 |
12.2% |
0.12200599 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
517 |
38.7% |
0.38697605 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
141 |
10.6% |
0.10553892 |
| 6 |
Bad |
131 |
9.8% |
0.09805389 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
83 |
6.2% |
0.06212575 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
47 |
3.5% |
0.03517964 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme9_3
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Try to be unprejudiced about muslims because of
own conviction.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced in regard to muslims due to my own convictions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
160 |
12.0% |
0.11976048 |
| 2 |
Good |
338 |
25.3% |
0.25299401 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
203 |
15.2% |
0.15194611 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
431 |
32.3% |
0.32260479 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
67 |
5.0% |
0.05014970 |
| 6 |
Bad |
61 |
4.6% |
0.04565868 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02544910 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
3.1% |
0.03143713 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme9_4
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Do not want to appear racist, not even to
myself.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
330 |
24.7% |
0.24700599 |
| 2 |
Good |
392 |
29.3% |
0.29341317 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
159 |
11.9% |
0.11901198 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
305 |
22.8% |
0.22829341 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
57 |
4.3% |
0.04266467 |
| 6 |
Bad |
33 |
2.5% |
0.02470060 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
15 |
1.1% |
0.01122754 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
3.4% |
0.03368263 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15polkom1a
|
Variable label:
|
Child rearing values: Independent/Respects adults.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Although there are many different qualities one believes children should
have, there are always some qualities that everyone thinks are more
important than others. You will now be presented with different pairs of
such desirable qualities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please indicate which of the two you think is most important for a child
to have.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1 or 2 or 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Is independent |
1301 |
32.3% |
0.3229891 |
| 2 |
Respects adults |
2046 |
50.8% |
0.5079444 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
681 |
16.9% |
0.1690665 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4077 |
|
NA |
r15polkom1b
|
Variable label:
|
Child rearing values: Curious/Polite.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Although there are many different qualities one believes children should
have, there are always some qualities that everyone thinks are more
important than others. You will now be presented with different pairs of
such desirable qualities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please indicate which of the two you think is most important for a child
to have.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1 or 2 or 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Is curious |
2633 |
65.4% |
0.65367428 |
| 2 |
Is polite |
1032 |
25.6% |
0.25620655 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
363 |
9.0% |
0.09011917 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4077 |
|
NA |
r15polkom1c
|
Variable label:
|
Child rearing values: Obedient/Independent.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Although there are many different qualities one believes children should
have, there are always some qualities that everyone thinks are more
important than others. You will now be presented with different pairs of
such desirable qualities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please indicate which of the two you think is most important for a child
to have.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1 or 2 or 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Is obedient |
410 |
10.2% |
0.1017875 |
| 2 |
Is independent |
3086 |
76.6% |
0.7661370 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
532 |
13.2% |
0.1320755 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4077 |
|
NA |
r15polkom1d
|
Variable label:
|
Child rearing values: Considerate/behaved properly.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Although there are many different qualities one believes children should
have, there are always some qualities that everyone thinks are more
important than others. You will now be presented with different pairs of
such desirable qualities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please indicate which of the two you think is most important for a child
to have.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1 or 2 or 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Is considerate |
2329 |
57.8% |
0.57820258 |
| 2 |
Behaves properly |
1412 |
35.1% |
0.35054618 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
287 |
7.1% |
0.07125124 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4077 |
|
NA |
r15polkom2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1373] [Invalid:6732]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
a |
438 |
31.9% |
0.3190095 |
| 2 |
b |
466 |
33.9% |
0.3394028 |
| 3 |
c (no exposure) |
469 |
34.2% |
0.3415878 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6732 |
|
NA |
r15polkom2a
|
Variable label:
|
Exposure to political conflict between Progress Party and Labour Party:
Listhaug.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the text below carefully. Norway has experienced various
political conflicts in recent times. Being involved in one of these
conflicts, Sylvi Listhaug from the Progress Party wrote that “the Labour
Party believes that the rights of terrorists are more important than the
nation’s security. LIKE AND SHARE!”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Were you previously aware of this comment?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1 and r15polkom2_ran = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
402 |
91.8% |
0.91780822 |
| 2 |
No |
36 |
8.2% |
0.08219178 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7667 |
|
NA |
r15polkom2b
|
Variable label:
|
Exposure to political conflict between Progress Party and Labour Party:
Gahr Støre.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the text below carefully. Norway has experienced various
political conflicts in recent times. Being involved in one of these
conflicts, Jonas Gahr Støre from the Labour Party said that Sylvi
Listhaug from the Progress Party “deliberately, calculatedly, kindles
the hatred that took so many lives on the 22nd of July”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Were you previously aware of this comment?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1 and r15polkom2_ran = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
364 |
78.1% |
0.781115880 |
| 2 |
No |
99 |
21.2% |
0.212446352 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.6% |
0.006437768 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7639 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Labour Party voters.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of
various Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Labour party voters
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
40 |
2.9% |
0.02909091 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
62 |
4.5% |
0.04509091 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
143 |
10.4% |
0.10400000 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
543 |
39.5% |
0.39490909 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
326 |
23.7% |
0.23709091 |
| 6 |
Really like |
192 |
14.0% |
0.13963636 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02472727 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
2.5% |
0.02545455 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Conservative Party voters.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of
various Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Conservative Party voters
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02327273 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
90 |
6.5% |
0.06545455 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
222 |
16.1% |
0.16145455 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
533 |
38.8% |
0.38763636 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
263 |
19.1% |
0.19127273 |
| 6 |
Really like |
160 |
11.6% |
0.11636364 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
42 |
3.1% |
0.03054545 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02400000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Progress Party voters.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of
various Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Progress party voters
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
214 |
15.6% |
0.15563636 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
238 |
17.3% |
0.17309091 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
290 |
21.1% |
0.21090909 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
380 |
27.6% |
0.27636364 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
132 |
9.6% |
0.09600000 |
| 6 |
Really like |
62 |
4.5% |
0.04509091 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
25 |
1.8% |
0.01818182 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02472727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Christian Democratic Party voters.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of
various Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Christian Democratic Party Voters
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
107 |
7.8% |
0.077818182 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
165 |
12.0% |
0.120000000 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
298 |
21.7% |
0.216727273 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
541 |
39.3% |
0.393454545 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
166 |
12.1% |
0.120727273 |
| 6 |
Really like |
55 |
4.0% |
0.040000000 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007272727 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.4% |
0.024000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Liberal Party voters.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of
various Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Liberal Party voters
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
75 |
5.5% |
0.05454545 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
107 |
7.8% |
0.07781818 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
213 |
15.5% |
0.15490909 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
637 |
46.3% |
0.46327273 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
228 |
16.6% |
0.16581818 |
| 6 |
Really like |
61 |
4.4% |
0.04436364 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
14 |
1.0% |
0.01018182 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.9% |
0.02909091 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Socialist Left Party voters.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of
various Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Socialist Left Party voters
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
111 |
8.1% |
0.08072727 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
125 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
179 |
13.0% |
0.13018182 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
513 |
37.3% |
0.37309091 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
222 |
16.1% |
0.16145455 |
| 6 |
Really like |
153 |
11.1% |
0.11127273 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
37 |
2.7% |
0.02690909 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
2.5% |
0.02545455 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Centre Party voters.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of
various Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Centre Party voters
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02327273 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
56 |
4.1% |
0.04072727 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
177 |
12.9% |
0.12872727 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
631 |
45.9% |
0.45890909 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
273 |
19.9% |
0.19854545 |
| 6 |
Really like |
135 |
9.8% |
0.09818182 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
31 |
2.3% |
0.02254545 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.9% |
0.02909091 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Green Party voters.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of
various Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Green Party voters
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
154 |
11.2% |
0.11200000 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
152 |
11.1% |
0.11054545 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
190 |
13.8% |
0.13818182 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
463 |
33.7% |
0.33672727 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
220 |
16.0% |
0.16000000 |
| 6 |
Really like |
126 |
9.2% |
0.09163636 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02327273 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.8% |
0.02763636 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Red Party voters.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of
various Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Red Party voters
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
161 |
11.7% |
0.11709091 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
138 |
10.0% |
0.10036364 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
189 |
13.7% |
0.13745455 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
505 |
36.7% |
0.36727273 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
198 |
14.4% |
0.14400000 |
| 6 |
Really like |
115 |
8.4% |
0.08363636 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02400000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
2.6% |
0.02618182 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3b
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R15POLKOM3].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have anything to add please write it here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15polkom4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike supporters of: Human Rights Service.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the supporters of
various Norwegian political organisations.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Human Rights Service, An organisation that works towards Islamic
influence and Muslim immigration to Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
190 |
13.8% |
0.13818182 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
220 |
16.0% |
0.16000000 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
206 |
15.0% |
0.14981818 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
376 |
27.3% |
0.27345455 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
125 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
| 6 |
Really like |
76 |
5.5% |
0.05527273 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
58 |
4.2% |
0.04218182 |
| 8 |
Unaware of |
90 |
6.5% |
0.06545455 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02472727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike supporters of: The Norwegian Centre Against Racism.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the supporters of
various Norwegian political organisations.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian Centre against Racism, An organisation whose main
objective is to fight racism and the discrimination of minorities in
Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
27 |
2.0% |
0.01963636 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
48 |
3.5% |
0.03490909 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
88 |
6.4% |
0.06400000 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
435 |
31.6% |
0.31636364 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
265 |
19.3% |
0.19272727 |
| 6 |
Really like |
283 |
20.6% |
0.20581818 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
154 |
11.2% |
0.11200000 |
| 8 |
Unaware of |
39 |
2.8% |
0.02836364 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
2.6% |
0.02618182 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom4_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike supporters of: Civita.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the supporters of
various Norwegian political organisations.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Civita, A organisation which, among other things, doesn’t want the
public sector to play a major role in Norway’s economy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
67 |
4.9% |
0.04872727 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
158 |
11.5% |
0.11490909 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
255 |
18.5% |
0.18545455 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
518 |
37.7% |
0.37672727 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
121 |
8.8% |
0.08800000 |
| 6 |
Really like |
69 |
5.0% |
0.05018182 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
19 |
1.4% |
0.01381818 |
| 8 |
Unaware of |
128 |
9.3% |
0.09309091 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.9% |
0.02909091 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom4_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike supporters of: Agenda.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the supporters of
various Norwegian political organisations.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Agenda, An organisation which, among other things, wants the public
sector to play a major role in Norway’s economy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
26 |
1.9% |
0.01890909 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
46 |
3.3% |
0.03345455 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
125 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
540 |
39.3% |
0.39272727 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
241 |
17.5% |
0.17527273 |
| 6 |
Really like |
152 |
11.1% |
0.11054545 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
56 |
4.1% |
0.04072727 |
| 8 |
Unaware of |
152 |
11.1% |
0.11054545 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.7% |
0.02690909 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike people who: Support a multicultural society.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike people who
|
|
Literal question:
|
Support a multicultural society
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
37 |
2.7% |
0.02690909 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
47 |
3.4% |
0.03418182 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
136 |
9.9% |
0.09890909 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
367 |
26.7% |
0.26690909 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
334 |
24.3% |
0.24290909 |
| 6 |
Really like |
324 |
23.6% |
0.23563636 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
97 |
7.1% |
0.07054545 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02400000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike people who: Oppose a multicultural society.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike people who
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are against a multicultural society
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
204 |
14.8% |
0.14836364 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
310 |
22.5% |
0.22545455 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
337 |
24.5% |
0.24509091 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
337 |
24.5% |
0.24509091 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
89 |
6.5% |
0.06472727 |
| 6 |
Really like |
44 |
3.2% |
0.03200000 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
21 |
1.5% |
0.01527273 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02400000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike people who: Think the state should drastically decrease
income- and wealth taxation.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike people who
|
|
Literal question:
|
Believe the state must drastically lower income tax and wealth tax rates
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
84 |
6.1% |
0.06109091 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
190 |
13.8% |
0.13818182 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
276 |
20.1% |
0.20072727 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
488 |
35.5% |
0.35490909 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
193 |
14.0% |
0.14036364 |
| 6 |
Really like |
87 |
6.3% |
0.06327273 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
25 |
1.8% |
0.01818182 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02327273 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom5_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike people who: Think the state should drastically increase
income- and wealth taxation.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike people who
|
|
Literal question:
|
Believe the state must drastically raise income tax and wealth tax rates
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
159 |
11.6% |
0.11563636 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
205 |
14.9% |
0.14909091 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
278 |
20.2% |
0.20218182 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
421 |
30.6% |
0.30618182 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
183 |
13.3% |
0.13309091 |
| 6 |
Really like |
79 |
5.7% |
0.05745455 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01309091 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02327273 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom6_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15polkom6. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15polkom6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1323] [Invalid:6782]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Did you partake in the following last week? Read |
664 |
50.2% |
0.5018896 |
| 2 |
do you usually partake in the following during the week? Reading |
659 |
49.8% |
0.4981104 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6782 |
|
NA |
r15polkom6_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15polkom6. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15polkom6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1323] [Invalid:6782]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
news |
659 |
49.8% |
0.4981104 |
| 2 |
political news |
664 |
50.2% |
0.5018896 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6782 |
|
NA |
r15polkom6
|
Variable label:
|
How often [last week/usually] do you read [news/political news].
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many days [Did you parttake in the following last week? Read/Do you
usually parttake in the following during the week?
Reading][news/political news] in the form of newspapers, online
newspapers or on your mobile phone?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on the values of r15polkom6_ran1 and r15polkom6_ran2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
7 days |
868 |
65.0% |
0.64970060 |
| 2 |
6 days |
126 |
9.4% |
0.09431138 |
| 3 |
5 days |
99 |
7.4% |
0.07410180 |
| 4 |
4 days |
55 |
4.1% |
0.04116766 |
| 5 |
3 days |
57 |
4.3% |
0.04266467 |
| 6 |
2 days |
37 |
2.8% |
0.02769461 |
| 7 |
1 days |
43 |
3.2% |
0.03218563 |
| 8 |
0 days |
31 |
2.3% |
0.02320359 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.5% |
0.01497006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15km_bompeng1
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that the government finances infrastructure with road rolls.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you find it acceptable that the authorities use tolls to fund roads,
bridges, tunnels and public transport?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
yes |
824 |
61.2% |
0.611729770 |
| 2 |
No |
421 |
31.3% |
0.312546399 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
71 |
5.3% |
0.052709725 |
| 4 |
No opinion |
15 |
1.1% |
0.011135857 |
| 5 |
No response |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008908686 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002969562 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15km_bompeng1_open
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R15KM_BOMPENG1].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please could you write a little bit about why you chose this alternative
as your answer.. Preferably a few sentences, or just a few words if you
would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4 and r15km_bompeng1 is answered. ] [Text data will
not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen
Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15helse1
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with your life at the moment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The next questions deal with your life and your health. This is part of
a research project that focuses on quality of life and compares with
international research. Therefore, these questions are a bit different
than ones usually found in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, and have
different response scales than the ones normally used. If you don’t want
to answer a question, you can skip the question by clicking “next”.
Click on next to proceed.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life at the
present time?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Not pleased at all |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001484781 |
| 1 |
1 |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005196733 |
| 2 |
2 |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008166295 |
| 3 |
3 |
24 |
1.8% |
0.017817372 |
| 4 |
4 |
48 |
3.6% |
0.035634744 |
| 5 |
5 |
90 |
6.7% |
0.066815145 |
| 6 |
6 |
122 |
9.1% |
0.090571641 |
| 7 |
7 |
268 |
19.9% |
0.198960653 |
| 8 |
8 |
409 |
30.4% |
0.303637713 |
| 9 |
9 |
181 |
13.4% |
0.134372680 |
| 10 |
10 - Very pleased |
180 |
13.4% |
0.133630290 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003711952 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse2
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you experience what you do in life as meaningful.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, to what extent do you experience that what you do
in life is meaningful?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Not meaningful at all |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004454343 |
| 1 |
1 |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003711952 |
| 2 |
2 |
14 |
1.0% |
0.010393467 |
| 3 |
3 |
26 |
1.9% |
0.019302153 |
| 4 |
4 |
45 |
3.3% |
0.033407572 |
| 5 |
5 |
81 |
6.0% |
0.060133630 |
| 6 |
6 |
134 |
9.9% |
0.099480327 |
| 7 |
7 |
275 |
20.4% |
0.204157387 |
| 8 |
8 |
370 |
27.5% |
0.274684484 |
| 9 |
9 |
178 |
13.2% |
0.132145509 |
| 10 |
10 - Very meaningful |
206 |
15.3% |
0.152932442 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005196733 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Happy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent
were you….?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Happy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Not at all |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005939124 |
| 1 |
1 |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005196733 |
| 2 |
2 |
16 |
1.2% |
0.011878248 |
| 3 |
3 |
40 |
3.0% |
0.029695620 |
| 4 |
4 |
50 |
3.7% |
0.037119525 |
| 5 |
5 |
134 |
9.9% |
0.099480327 |
| 6 |
6 |
168 |
12.5% |
0.124721604 |
| 7 |
7 |
242 |
18.0% |
0.179658500 |
| 8 |
8 |
303 |
22.5% |
0.224944321 |
| 9 |
9 |
191 |
14.2% |
0.141796585 |
| 10 |
10 -To a great extent |
151 |
11.2% |
0.112100965 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.7% |
0.027468448 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Worried.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent
were you….?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Worried
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Not at all |
111 |
8.2% |
0.08240535 |
| 1 |
1 |
140 |
10.4% |
0.10393467 |
| 2 |
2 |
206 |
15.3% |
0.15293244 |
| 3 |
3 |
203 |
15.1% |
0.15070527 |
| 4 |
4 |
114 |
8.5% |
0.08463252 |
| 5 |
5 |
155 |
11.5% |
0.11507053 |
| 6 |
6 |
118 |
8.8% |
0.08760208 |
| 7 |
7 |
108 |
8.0% |
0.08017817 |
| 8 |
8 |
68 |
5.0% |
0.05048255 |
| 9 |
9 |
37 |
2.7% |
0.02746845 |
| 10 |
10 -To a great extent |
28 |
2.1% |
0.02078693 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
4.4% |
0.04380104 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Down or sad.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent
were you….?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Down or sad
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Not at all |
324 |
24.1% |
0.24053452 |
| 1 |
1 |
222 |
16.5% |
0.16481069 |
| 2 |
2 |
189 |
14.0% |
0.14031180 |
| 3 |
3 |
146 |
10.8% |
0.10838901 |
| 4 |
4 |
72 |
5.3% |
0.05345212 |
| 5 |
5 |
108 |
8.0% |
0.08017817 |
| 6 |
6 |
81 |
6.0% |
0.06013363 |
| 7 |
7 |
66 |
4.9% |
0.04899777 |
| 8 |
8 |
30 |
2.2% |
0.02227171 |
| 9 |
9 |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01336303 |
| 10 |
10 -To a great extent |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01336303 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
73 |
5.4% |
0.05419451 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_4
|
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Irritated.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent
were you….?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Irritated
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Not at all |
172 |
12.8% |
0.127691166 |
| 1 |
1 |
198 |
14.7% |
0.146993318 |
| 2 |
2 |
232 |
17.2% |
0.172234595 |
| 3 |
3 |
188 |
14.0% |
0.139569414 |
| 4 |
4 |
136 |
10.1% |
0.100965108 |
| 5 |
5 |
110 |
8.2% |
0.081662955 |
| 6 |
6 |
88 |
6.5% |
0.065330364 |
| 7 |
7 |
89 |
6.6% |
0.066072754 |
| 8 |
8 |
36 |
2.7% |
0.026726058 |
| 9 |
9 |
18 |
1.3% |
0.013363029 |
| 10 |
10 -To a great extent |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006681514 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
5.3% |
0.052709725 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_5
|
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Lonely.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent
were you….?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Lonely
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Not at all |
589 |
43.7% |
0.43726800 |
| 1 |
1 |
187 |
13.9% |
0.13882702 |
| 2 |
2 |
133 |
9.9% |
0.09873794 |
| 3 |
3 |
77 |
5.7% |
0.05716407 |
| 4 |
4 |
55 |
4.1% |
0.04083148 |
| 5 |
5 |
68 |
5.0% |
0.05048255 |
| 6 |
6 |
53 |
3.9% |
0.03934670 |
| 7 |
7 |
50 |
3.7% |
0.03711952 |
| 8 |
8 |
26 |
1.9% |
0.01930215 |
| 9 |
9 |
19 |
1.4% |
0.01410542 |
| 10 |
10 -To a great extent |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01187825 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
5.5% |
0.05493690 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_6
|
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Enthusiastic.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent
were you….?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Enthusiastic
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Not at all |
13 |
1.0% |
0.009651076 |
| 1 |
1 |
26 |
1.9% |
0.019302153 |
| 2 |
2 |
32 |
2.4% |
0.023756496 |
| 3 |
3 |
70 |
5.2% |
0.051967335 |
| 4 |
4 |
110 |
8.2% |
0.081662955 |
| 5 |
5 |
184 |
13.7% |
0.136599852 |
| 6 |
6 |
173 |
12.8% |
0.128433556 |
| 7 |
7 |
240 |
17.8% |
0.178173719 |
| 8 |
8 |
223 |
16.6% |
0.165553081 |
| 9 |
9 |
128 |
9.5% |
0.095025984 |
| 10 |
10 -To a great extent |
82 |
6.1% |
0.060876021 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
66 |
4.9% |
0.048997773 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_7
|
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Calm and relaxed.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent
were you….?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Calm and relaxed
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Not at all |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008166295 |
| 1 |
1 |
24 |
1.8% |
0.017817372 |
| 2 |
2 |
50 |
3.7% |
0.037119525 |
| 3 |
3 |
67 |
5.0% |
0.049740163 |
| 4 |
4 |
93 |
6.9% |
0.069042316 |
| 5 |
5 |
204 |
15.1% |
0.151447661 |
| 6 |
6 |
164 |
12.2% |
0.121752042 |
| 7 |
7 |
215 |
16.0% |
0.159613957 |
| 8 |
8 |
228 |
16.9% |
0.169265033 |
| 9 |
9 |
134 |
9.9% |
0.099480327 |
| 10 |
10 -To a great extent |
95 |
7.1% |
0.070527097 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
62 |
4.6% |
0.046028211 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_8
|
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Anxious.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent
were you….?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anxious
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Not at all |
395 |
29.3% |
0.29324425 |
| 1 |
1 |
269 |
20.0% |
0.19970304 |
| 2 |
2 |
158 |
11.7% |
0.11729770 |
| 3 |
3 |
110 |
8.2% |
0.08166295 |
| 4 |
4 |
65 |
4.8% |
0.04825538 |
| 5 |
5 |
98 |
7.3% |
0.07275427 |
| 6 |
6 |
58 |
4.3% |
0.04305865 |
| 7 |
7 |
61 |
4.5% |
0.04528582 |
| 8 |
8 |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02524128 |
| 9 |
9 |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01187825 |
| 10 |
10 -To a great extent |
17 |
1.3% |
0.01262064 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
66 |
4.9% |
0.04899777 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: My social relations are supportive and rewarding.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the assertions below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
My social relationships are supportive and rewarding.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Completely disagree |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006681514 |
| 1 |
1 |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005196733 |
| 2 |
2 |
17 |
1.3% |
0.012620638 |
| 3 |
3 |
36 |
2.7% |
0.026726058 |
| 4 |
4 |
43 |
3.2% |
0.031922791 |
| 5 |
5 |
139 |
10.3% |
0.103192279 |
| 6 |
6 |
140 |
10.4% |
0.103934670 |
| 7 |
7 |
242 |
18.0% |
0.179658500 |
| 8 |
8 |
266 |
19.7% |
0.197475872 |
| 9 |
9 |
175 |
13.0% |
0.129918337 |
| 10 |
10 - Completely agree |
249 |
18.5% |
0.184855234 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.8% |
0.017817372 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I contribute actively to other peoples’ happiness and
life quality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the assertions below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I actively contribute to the happiness and quality of life of others.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Completely disagree |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003711952 |
| 1 |
1 |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005939124 |
| 2 |
2 |
30 |
2.2% |
0.022271715 |
| 3 |
3 |
35 |
2.6% |
0.025983667 |
| 4 |
4 |
43 |
3.2% |
0.031922791 |
| 5 |
5 |
161 |
12.0% |
0.119524870 |
| 6 |
6 |
180 |
13.4% |
0.133630290 |
| 7 |
7 |
247 |
18.3% |
0.183370453 |
| 8 |
8 |
291 |
21.6% |
0.216035635 |
| 9 |
9 |
148 |
11.0% |
0.109873794 |
| 10 |
10 - Completely agree |
173 |
12.8% |
0.128433556 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.9% |
0.019302153 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse5_mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[ Specifies whether the respondent uses a mobile device.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Specifies whether the respondent uses a mobile device.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1344] [Invalid:6761]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not mobile |
845 |
62.9% |
0.6287202 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
499 |
37.1% |
0.3712798 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6761 |
|
NA |
r15helse5_walk
|
Variable label:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY: MOBILITY
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY.
|
|
Literal question:
|
MOBILITY
|
|
Technical description:
|
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol
Research Foundation.
[Asked if r15group = 4. The wording of the question is somewhat
simplified if r15helse5_mobil = 1. Contact Bjarne Robberstad for further
details (Bjarne.Robberstad@uib.no)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I have no problems in walking about |
1062 |
78.8% |
0.788418708 |
| 2 |
I have slight problems in walking about |
181 |
13.4% |
0.134372680 |
| 3 |
I have moderate problems in walking about |
64 |
4.8% |
0.047512992 |
| 4 |
I have severe problems in walking about |
28 |
2.1% |
0.020786934 |
| 5 |
I am unable to walk about |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003711952 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005196733 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse5_care
|
Variable label:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY:
SELF-CARE
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY.
|
|
Literal question:
|
SELF-CARE
|
|
Technical description:
|
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol
Research Foundation.
[Asked if r15group = 4. The wording of the question is somewhat
simplified if r15helse5_mobil = 1. Contact Bjarne Robberstad for further
details (Bjarne.Robberstad@uib.no)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I have no problems washing or dressing myself |
1286 |
95.5% |
0.9547141797 |
| 2 |
I have slight problems washing or dressing myself |
39 |
2.9% |
0.0289532294 |
| 3 |
I have moderate problems washing or dressing myself |
6 |
0.4% |
0.0044543430 |
| 4 |
I have severe problems washing or dressing myself |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007423905 |
| 5 |
I am unable to wash or dress myself |
3 |
0.2% |
0.0022271715 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.0089086860 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse5_activities
|
Variable label:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY: VANLIGE
AKTIVITETER
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY.
|
|
Literal question:
|
USUAL ACTIVITIES
|
|
Technical description:
|
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol
Research Foundation.
[Asked if r15group = 4. The wording of the question is somewhat
simplified if r15helse5_mobil = 1. Contact Bjarne Robberstad for further
details (Bjarne.Robberstad@uib.no)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I have no problems doing my usual activities |
1047 |
77.7% |
0.777282851 |
| 2 |
I have slight problems doing my usual activities |
225 |
16.7% |
0.167037862 |
| 3 |
I have moderate problems doing my usual activities |
46 |
3.4% |
0.034149963 |
| 4 |
I have severe problems doing my usual activities |
17 |
1.3% |
0.012620638 |
| 5 |
I am unable to do my usual activities |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002227171 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006681514 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse5_pain
|
Variable label:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY:
SMERTER/UBEHAG
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY.
|
|
Literal question:
|
PAIN / DISCOMFORT
|
|
Technical description:
|
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol
Research Foundation.
[Asked if r15group = 4. The wording of the question is somewhat
simplified if r15helse5_mobil = 1. Contact Bjarne Robberstad for further
details (Bjarne.Robberstad@uib.no)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I have no pain or discomfort |
507 |
37.6% |
0.376391982 |
| 2 |
I have slight pain or discomfort |
627 |
46.5% |
0.465478842 |
| 3 |
I have moderate pain or discomfort |
156 |
11.6% |
0.115812918 |
| 4 |
I have severe pain or discomfort |
39 |
2.9% |
0.028953229 |
| 5 |
I have extreme pain or discomfort |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005939124 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007423905 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse5_anxiety
|
Variable label:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY:
ANGST/DEPRESJON
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY.
|
|
Literal question:
|
ANXIETY / DEPRESSION
|
|
Technical description:
|
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol
Research Foundation.
[Asked if r15group = 4. The wording of the question is somewhat
simplified if r15helse5_mobil = 1. Contact Bjarne Robberstad for further
details (Bjarne.Robberstad@uib.no)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am not anxious or depressed |
904 |
67.1% |
0.671121010 |
| 2 |
I am slightly anxious or depressed |
304 |
22.6% |
0.225686711 |
| 3 |
I am moderately anxious or depressed |
104 |
7.7% |
0.077208612 |
| 4 |
I am severely anxious or depressed |
23 |
1.7% |
0.017074981 |
| 5 |
I am extremely anxious or depressed |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001484781 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007423905 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse6
|
Variable label:
|
Please click on the scale to indicate how your health is TODAY.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know how good or bad your health is TODAY. This scale
is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health you can imagine. 0
means the worst health you can imagine.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please click on the scale to indicate how your health is TODAY.
|
|
Technical description:
|
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol
Research Foundation.
[Asked if r15group = 4. The respondent answers by clicking on a vertical
“slider”.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1342] [Invalid:6763]
[Range:0-100]
|
r15polinpad1_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15polinpad1_1, r15polinpad1_2, r15polinpad1_3.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r15polinpad1_1, r15polinpad1_2, r15polinpad1_3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1343] [Invalid:6762]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Blank] |
332 |
24.7% |
0.2472077 |
| 2 |
Therefore, the representative reads local news and is aware of the electorate’s
political opinions in their county |
363 |
27.0% |
0.2702904 |
| 3 |
Therefore, the representative creates a forum on social media instead of
arranging a meeting at the county house. The representatives read and write down
the electorate’s opinions |
329 |
24.5% |
0.2449739 |
| 4 |
Therefore, the representative arranges an open meeting at the county house
instead of creating a forum on social media. The representatives read and write
down the electorate´s opinions |
319 |
23.8% |
0.2375279 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6762 |
|
NA |
r15polinpad1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree on decision legitimacy: Representative should follow
majority even if party disagrees.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Parliamentary representatives from your county are to adopt a new health
reform. The individual representatives are not obligated to consult the
electorate before voting takes place, but vote based on personal
conviction. [(blank)/Despite this, the representative from your county
wishes to consult the electorate. [Therefore, the representative reads
local news and is aware of the electorate’s political opinions in their
county/ Therefore, the representative creates a forum on social media
instead of arranging a meeting at the county house. The representatives
read and write down the electorate’s opinions / Therefore, the
representative arranges an open meeting at the county house instead of
creating a forum on social media. The representatives read and write
down the electorate’s opinions]] To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The representatives should follow the opinion of the majority in their
county, even if this goes against party opinion.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on the values of r15polinpad1_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
196 |
14.6% |
0.14550854 |
| 2 |
Agree |
369 |
27.4% |
0.27394209 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
298 |
22.1% |
0.22123237 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
148 |
11.0% |
0.10987379 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
128 |
9.5% |
0.09502598 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
137 |
10.2% |
0.10170750 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
32 |
2.4% |
0.02375650 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
39 |
2.9% |
0.02895323 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15polinpad1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree on decision legitimacy: Process is legitimate no matter
how the representative votes.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Parliamentary representatives from your county are to adopt a new health
reform. The individual representatives are not obligated to consult the
electorate before voting takes place, but vote based on personal
conviction. [(blank)/Despite this, the representative from your county
wishes to consult the electorate. [Therefore, the representative reads
local news and is aware of the electorate’s political opinions in their
county/ Therefore, the representative creates a forum on social media
instead of arranging a meeting at the county house. The representatives
read and write down the electorate’s opinions / Therefore, the
representative arranges an open meeting at the county house instead of
creating a forum on social media. The representatives read and write
down the electorate’s opinions]] To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Regardless of how the representative votes in Parliament, the
decision-making process is legitimate.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on the values of r15polinpad1_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
85 |
6.3% |
0.06310319 |
| 2 |
Agree |
395 |
29.3% |
0.29324425 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
235 |
17.4% |
0.17446177 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
296 |
22.0% |
0.21974759 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
134 |
9.9% |
0.09948033 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
91 |
6.8% |
0.06755754 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02524128 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
77 |
5.7% |
0.05716407 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15polinpad1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree on decision legitimacy: The representative’s decision is
fair and reflects voter interests.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Parliamentary representatives from your county are to adopt a new health
reform. The individual representatives are not obligated to consult the
electorate before voting takes place, but vote based on personal
conviction. [(blank)/Despite this, the representative from your county
wishes to consult the electorate. [Therefore, the representative reads
local news and is aware of the electorate’s political opinions in their
county/ Therefore, the representative creates a forum on social media
instead of arranging a meeting at the county house. The representatives
read and write down the electorate’s opinions / Therefore, the
representative arranges an open meeting at the county house instead of
creating a forum on social media. The representatives read and write
down the electorate’s opinions]] To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The representative’s decision is justified and reflects the interests of
the electorate.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on the values of r15polinpad1_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
48 |
3.6% |
0.03563474 |
| 2 |
Agree |
234 |
17.4% |
0.17371938 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
272 |
20.2% |
0.20193022 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
336 |
24.9% |
0.24944321 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
220 |
16.3% |
0.16332591 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
124 |
9.2% |
0.09205642 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
3.4% |
0.03414996 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
5.0% |
0.04974016 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1a_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects age
for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects age
for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
21 years old |
314 |
23.4% |
0.2343284 |
| 2 |
30 years old |
337 |
25.1% |
0.2514925 |
| 3 |
41 years old |
340 |
25.4% |
0.2537313 |
| 4 |
55 years old |
349 |
26.0% |
0.2604478 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1a_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
gender til r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
gender til r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
male |
677 |
50.5% |
0.5052239 |
| 2 |
female |
663 |
49.5% |
0.4947761 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1a_ran2b
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Selects gender pronoun
based on the value of r15padproleg1a_ran2 for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Selects gender pronoun
based on the value of r15padproleg1a_ran2 for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
he |
677 |
50.5% |
0.5052239 |
| 2 |
she |
663 |
49.5% |
0.4947761 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1a_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
reasoning for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
reasoning for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
their ethnicity |
179 |
13.4% |
0.1335821 |
| 2 |
their origins |
199 |
14.9% |
0.1485075 |
| 3 |
the colour of their skin |
223 |
16.6% |
0.1664179 |
| 4 |
their nationality |
186 |
13.9% |
0.1388060 |
| 5 |
their religion |
190 |
14.2% |
0.1417910 |
| 6 |
their sexual orientation |
178 |
13.3% |
0.1328358 |
| 7 |
their political opinions |
185 |
13.8% |
0.1380597 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1a_ran4
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
identification documents for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
identification documents for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The asylum seeker had valid ID documents (passport) from their home country |
706 |
52.7% |
0.5268657 |
| 2 |
The asylum seeker did not have valid ID documents (passport) from their home
country |
634 |
47.3% |
0.4731343 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1b_ran5
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
quantity for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
quantity for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The vast majority |
261 |
19.5% |
0.1947761 |
| 2 |
Many |
272 |
20.3% |
0.2029851 |
| 3 |
Some |
267 |
19.9% |
0.1992537 |
| 4 |
Few |
258 |
19.3% |
0.1925373 |
| 5 |
Almost none |
282 |
21.0% |
0.2104478 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1b_ran6
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
adjudication procedure for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
adjudication procedure for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
automatically processed by a computer programme |
709 |
52.9% |
0.5291045 |
| 2 |
manually processed by a bureaucrat |
631 |
47.1% |
0.4708955 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1b_ran7
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
outcome for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
outcome for r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
approved |
642 |
47.9% |
0.4791045 |
| 2 |
not approved |
698 |
52.1% |
0.5208955 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1b_ran8
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
number of wrongful decisions til r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects
number of wrongful decisions til r15padproleg1a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
none |
197 |
14.7% |
0.1470149 |
| 2 |
one out of a hundred |
189 |
14.1% |
0.1410448 |
| 3 |
one out of fifty |
179 |
13.4% |
0.1335821 |
| 4 |
one out of twenty |
191 |
14.3% |
0.1425373 |
| 5 |
one out of ten |
180 |
13.4% |
0.1343284 |
| 6 |
one out of five |
195 |
14.6% |
0.1455224 |
| 7 |
one out of three |
209 |
15.6% |
0.1559701 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1a
|
Variable label:
|
Asylum application should/should not be approved.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Bureaucratic decisions are increasingly being made automatically, that
is, without humans being involved. For example, The Norwegian
Directorate of Immigration uses a robot to make certain decisions about
asylum residency. We are interested in finding out about what
circumstances people think decisions can be left to computers and when
they can be left to people. Please consider the following scenario and
assess whether you think the decision should be made automatically or
manually processed by a bureaucrat. Please note that the scenario does
not refer to an actual event that has taken place at The Norwegian
Directorate of Immigration: A [21 years old/30 years old/41 years old/55
years old] [male/female] has applied for protection (asylum), and is to
have their application assessed by The Norwegian Directorate of
Immigration. The asylum seeker is applying for protection because
[he/she] due to [their ethnicity / their origins / the colour of their
skin / their nationality / their religion / their sexual orientation /
their political opinions] fears persecution in the home country [he/she]
states they come from. [The asylum seeker had valid ID documents
(passport) from their home country / The asylum seeker did not have
valid ID documents (passport) from their home country]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Firstly, could you please state your opinion regarding the asylum
application. Based on this information, do you think that the asylum
seeker should be allowed to stay?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on the values of r15padproleg1a_ran1, r15padproleg1a_ran2,
r15padproleg1a_ran2b, r15padproleg1a_ran3,r15padproleg1a_ran4. The
values are randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
659 |
48.9% |
0.48923534 |
| 2 |
No |
624 |
46.3% |
0.46325167 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
4.8% |
0.04751299 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1b
|
Variable label:
|
Manual or automatic review of asylum application.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Furthermore, imagine that [The vast majority / Many / Some / Few /
Almost none] that come from the asylum seeker’s home country have been
granted asylum in Norway during the last year, after having their
application [automatically processed by a computer programme/manualle
processed by a bureaucrat] that evaluates the real danger of persecution
that the asylum seekers face in their home country in the future. It has
become apparent that among those who [approved/not approved] asylum
during the past year from that country, [none/one out of a hundred/one
out of fifty/one out of twenty/one out of ten/one out of five/one out of
three]decisions were subsequently overturned due to processing errors.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on this information, how do you think the asylum seeker’s
application should be processed?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on the values of r15padproleg1b_ran5, r15padproleg1b_ran6,
r15padproleg1b_ran7, r15padproleg1b_ran8. The values are randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It should be processed manually by a bureaucrat |
1078 |
80.0% |
0.80029696 |
| 2 |
It should be processed automatically by a robot |
235 |
17.4% |
0.17446177 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02524128 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Randomly selects variant of r15polkom8. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Randomly selects variant of r15polkom8. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
T11 |
251 |
18.5% |
0.1845588 |
| 2 |
T12 |
213 |
15.7% |
0.1566176 |
| 3 |
T13 |
231 |
17.0% |
0.1698529 |
| 4 |
T21 |
198 |
14.6% |
0.1455882 |
| 5 |
T22 |
224 |
16.5% |
0.1647059 |
| 6 |
T23 |
243 |
17.9% |
0.1786765 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_t11
|
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How satisfied with democracy in Norway: Very-not at all,
word options.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy
works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom8_ran = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
64 |
25.5% |
0.254980080 |
| 2 |
Quite satisfied |
155 |
61.8% |
0.617529880 |
| 3 |
Not satisfied |
28 |
11.2% |
0.111553785 |
| 4 |
Not satisfied at all |
3 |
1.2% |
0.011952191 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003984064 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7854 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_t12
|
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How satisfied with democracy in Norway: Extremely-not at
all, word options.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy
works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom8_ran = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Extremely satisfied |
6 |
2.8% |
0.028169014 |
| 2 |
Very satisfied |
74 |
34.7% |
0.347417840 |
| 3 |
Satisfied |
80 |
37.6% |
0.375586854 |
| 4 |
Quite satisfied |
25 |
11.7% |
0.117370892 |
| 5 |
Somewhat satisfied |
15 |
7.0% |
0.070422535 |
| 6 |
Not satisfied |
11 |
5.2% |
0.051643192 |
| 7 |
Not satisfied at all |
2 |
0.9% |
0.009389671 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7892 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_t13
|
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How satisfied with democracy in Norway: Extremely-not at
all, number options.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy
works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom8_ran = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 Extremely satisfied |
19 |
8.2% |
0.08225108 |
| 2 |
2 |
90 |
39.0% |
0.38961039 |
| 3 |
3 |
55 |
23.8% |
0.23809524 |
| 4 |
4 |
27 |
11.7% |
0.11688312 |
| 5 |
5 |
28 |
12.1% |
0.12121212 |
| 6 |
6 |
9 |
3.9% |
0.03896104 |
| 7 |
7 Not satisfied at all |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01298701 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7874 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_t21
|
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How pleased with democracy in Norway: Very-not at all,
word options.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how pleased are you with the way democracy works
in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom8_ran = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very pleased |
46 |
23.2% |
0.23232323 |
| 2 |
Quite pleased |
127 |
64.1% |
0.64141414 |
| 3 |
Not pleased |
21 |
10.6% |
0.10606061 |
| 4 |
Not pleased at all |
2 |
1.0% |
0.01010101 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
1.0% |
0.01010101 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7907 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_t22
|
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How pleased with democracy in Norway: Extremely-not at
all, number options.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how pleased are you with the way democracy works
in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom8_ran = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 Extremely pleased |
24 |
10.7% |
0.10714286 |
| 2 |
2 |
81 |
36.2% |
0.36160714 |
| 3 |
3 |
50 |
22.3% |
0.22321429 |
| 4 |
4 |
33 |
14.7% |
0.14732143 |
| 5 |
5 |
21 |
9.4% |
0.09375000 |
| 6 |
6 |
12 |
5.4% |
0.05357143 |
| 7 |
7 Not pleased at all |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01339286 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7881 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_t23
|
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How pleased with democracy in Norway: Extremely-not at
all, word options.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how pleased are you with the way democracy works
in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom8_ran = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Extremely pleased |
7 |
2.9% |
0.02880658 |
| 2 |
Very pleased |
77 |
31.7% |
0.31687243 |
| 3 |
Pleased |
94 |
38.7% |
0.38683128 |
| 4 |
Quite pleased |
24 |
9.9% |
0.09876543 |
| 5 |
Somewhat pleased |
27 |
11.1% |
0.11111111 |
| 6 |
Not pleased |
10 |
4.1% |
0.04115226 |
| 7 |
Not pleased at all |
4 |
1.6% |
0.01646091 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7862 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Randomly selects variant of r15polkom9. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Randomly selects variant of r15polkom9. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
T11 |
251 |
18.5% |
0.1845588 |
| 2 |
T12 |
213 |
15.7% |
0.1566176 |
| 3 |
T13 |
231 |
17.0% |
0.1698529 |
| 4 |
T21 |
198 |
14.6% |
0.1455882 |
| 5 |
T22 |
224 |
16.5% |
0.1647059 |
| 6 |
T23 |
243 |
17.9% |
0.1786765 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_t11
|
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How satisfied with personal economy: Very-not at all,
word options.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with your current personal financial situation?
Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom9_ran = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very pleased |
57 |
22.7% |
0.22709163 |
| 2 |
Quite pleased |
161 |
64.1% |
0.64143426 |
| 3 |
Not pleased |
30 |
12.0% |
0.11952191 |
| 4 |
Not pleased at all |
3 |
1.2% |
0.01195219 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7854 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_t12
|
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How satisfied with personal economy: Extremely-not at
all, word options.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with your current personal financial situation?
Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom9_ran = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Extremely satisfied |
10 |
4.7% |
0.04694836 |
| 2 |
Very satisfied |
60 |
28.2% |
0.28169014 |
| 3 |
Satisfied |
87 |
40.8% |
0.40845070 |
| 4 |
Quite satisfied |
25 |
11.7% |
0.11737089 |
| 5 |
Somewhat satisfied |
15 |
7.0% |
0.07042254 |
| 6 |
Not satisfied |
11 |
5.2% |
0.05164319 |
| 7 |
Not satisfied at all |
5 |
2.3% |
0.02347418 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7892 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_t13
|
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How satisfied with personal economy: Extremely-not at
all, number options.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with your current personal financial situation?
Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom9_ran = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 Extremely satisfied |
30 |
13.0% |
0.12987013 |
| 2 |
2 |
73 |
31.6% |
0.31601732 |
| 3 |
3 |
61 |
26.4% |
0.26406926 |
| 4 |
4 |
29 |
12.6% |
0.12554113 |
| 5 |
5 |
25 |
10.8% |
0.10822511 |
| 6 |
6 |
10 |
4.3% |
0.04329004 |
| 7 |
7 Not satisfied at all |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01298701 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7874 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_t21
|
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How pleased with personal economy: Very-not at all, word
options.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How pleased are you with your current personal financial situation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom9_ran = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very pleased |
55 |
27.8% |
0.277777778 |
| 2 |
Quite pleased |
120 |
60.6% |
0.606060606 |
| 3 |
Not pleased |
18 |
9.1% |
0.090909091 |
| 4 |
Not pleased at all |
4 |
2.0% |
0.020202020 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005050505 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7907 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_t22
|
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How pleased with personal economy: Extremely-not a tall,
number options.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How pleased are you with your current personal financial situation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom9_ran = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 Extremely pleased |
27 |
12.1% |
0.12053571 |
| 2 |
2 |
63 |
28.1% |
0.28125000 |
| 3 |
3 |
64 |
28.6% |
0.28571429 |
| 4 |
4 |
35 |
15.6% |
0.15625000 |
| 5 |
5 |
23 |
10.3% |
0.10267857 |
| 6 |
6 |
6 |
2.7% |
0.02678571 |
| 7 |
7 Not pleased at all |
6 |
2.7% |
0.02678571 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7881 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_t23
|
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How pleased with personal economy: Extremely-not at all,
word options.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How pleased are you with your current personal financial situation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom9_ran = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Extremely pleased |
10 |
4.1% |
0.041152263 |
| 2 |
Very pleased |
70 |
28.8% |
0.288065844 |
| 3 |
Pleased |
81 |
33.3% |
0.333333333 |
| 4 |
Quite pleased |
35 |
14.4% |
0.144032922 |
| 5 |
Somewhat pleased |
26 |
10.7% |
0.106995885 |
| 6 |
Not pleased |
17 |
7.0% |
0.069958848 |
| 7 |
Not pleased at all |
3 |
1.2% |
0.012345679 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004115226 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7862 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Randomly selects variant of r15polkom10. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Randomly selects variant of r15polkom10. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
T11 |
152 |
11.2% |
0.1117647 |
| 2 |
T12 |
143 |
10.5% |
0.1051471 |
| 3 |
T13 |
137 |
10.1% |
0.1007353 |
| 4 |
T21 |
150 |
11.0% |
0.1102941 |
| 5 |
T22 |
139 |
10.2% |
0.1022059 |
| 6 |
T23 |
165 |
12.1% |
0.1213235 |
| 7 |
T31 |
148 |
10.9% |
0.1088235 |
| 8 |
T32 |
166 |
12.2% |
0.1220588 |
| 9 |
T33 |
160 |
11.8% |
0.1176471 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t11
|
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How fortunate are you, 1-5.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how fortunate would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Very unfortunate |
5 |
3.3% |
0.03289474 |
| 2 |
2 |
9 |
5.9% |
0.05921053 |
| 3 |
3 |
31 |
20.4% |
0.20394737 |
| 4 |
4 |
66 |
43.4% |
0.43421053 |
| 5 |
5 - Very fortunate |
41 |
27.0% |
0.26973684 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7953 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t12
|
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How fortunate are you, 1-7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how fortunate would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Very unfortunate |
6 |
4.2% |
0.04195804 |
| 2 |
2 |
4 |
2.8% |
0.02797203 |
| 3 |
3 |
12 |
8.4% |
0.08391608 |
| 4 |
4 |
22 |
15.4% |
0.15384615 |
| 5 |
5 |
37 |
25.9% |
0.25874126 |
| 6 |
6 |
34 |
23.8% |
0.23776224 |
| 7 |
7 - Very fortunate |
28 |
19.6% |
0.19580420 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7962 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t13
|
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How fortunate are you, 1-11.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how fortunate would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Very unfortunate |
1 |
0.7% |
0.00729927 |
| 2 |
2 |
2 |
1.5% |
0.01459854 |
| 3 |
3 |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02189781 |
| 4 |
4 |
5 |
3.6% |
0.03649635 |
| 5 |
5 |
5 |
3.6% |
0.03649635 |
| 6 |
6 |
14 |
10.2% |
0.10218978 |
| 7 |
7 |
16 |
11.7% |
0.11678832 |
| 8 |
8 |
23 |
16.8% |
0.16788321 |
| 9 |
9 |
31 |
22.6% |
0.22627737 |
| 10 |
10 |
24 |
17.5% |
0.17518248 |
| 11 |
11 - Very fortunate |
12 |
8.8% |
0.08759124 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.7% |
0.00729927 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7968 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t21
|
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How happy are you, 1-5.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how happy would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Very unhappy |
6 |
4.0% |
0.0400000 |
| 2 |
2 |
17 |
11.3% |
0.1133333 |
| 3 |
3 |
29 |
19.3% |
0.1933333 |
| 4 |
4 |
75 |
50.0% |
0.5000000 |
| 5 |
5 - Very happy |
23 |
15.3% |
0.1533333 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7955 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t22
|
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How happy are you, 1-7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how happy would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Very unhappy |
4 |
2.9% |
0.02877698 |
| 2 |
2 |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02158273 |
| 3 |
3 |
14 |
10.1% |
0.10071942 |
| 4 |
4 |
22 |
15.8% |
0.15827338 |
| 5 |
5 |
48 |
34.5% |
0.34532374 |
| 6 |
6 |
37 |
26.6% |
0.26618705 |
| 7 |
7 - Very happy |
11 |
7.9% |
0.07913669 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7966 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t23
|
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How happy are you, 1-11.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how happy would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:2-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Very unhappy |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 2 |
2 |
2 |
1.2% |
0.012121212 |
| 3 |
3 |
4 |
2.4% |
0.024242424 |
| 4 |
4 |
1 |
0.6% |
0.006060606 |
| 5 |
5 |
9 |
5.5% |
0.054545455 |
| 6 |
6 |
20 |
12.1% |
0.121212121 |
| 7 |
7 |
22 |
13.3% |
0.133333333 |
| 8 |
8 |
33 |
20.0% |
0.200000000 |
| 9 |
9 |
41 |
24.8% |
0.248484848 |
| 10 |
10 |
27 |
16.4% |
0.163636364 |
| 11 |
11 - Very happy |
5 |
3.0% |
0.030303030 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.6% |
0.006060606 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7940 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t31
|
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How privileged are you, 1-5.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how privileged would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Very unprivileged |
9 |
6.1% |
0.06081081 |
| 2 |
2 |
18 |
12.2% |
0.12162162 |
| 3 |
3 |
33 |
22.3% |
0.22297297 |
| 4 |
4 |
43 |
29.1% |
0.29054054 |
| 5 |
5 - Very privileged |
45 |
30.4% |
0.30405405 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7957 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t32
|
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How privileged are you, 1-7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how privileged would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 8. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Very unprivileged |
3 |
1.8% |
0.01807229 |
| 2 |
2 |
12 |
7.2% |
0.07228916 |
| 3 |
3 |
13 |
7.8% |
0.07831325 |
| 4 |
4 |
21 |
12.7% |
0.12650602 |
| 5 |
5 |
54 |
32.5% |
0.32530120 |
| 6 |
6 |
37 |
22.3% |
0.22289157 |
| 7 |
7 - Very privileged |
26 |
15.7% |
0.15662651 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7939 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t33
|
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How privileged are you, 1-11.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how privileged would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 9. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Very unprivileged |
2 |
1.3% |
0.01250 |
| 2 |
2 |
8 |
5.0% |
0.05000 |
| 3 |
3 |
4 |
2.5% |
0.02500 |
| 4 |
4 |
8 |
5.0% |
0.05000 |
| 5 |
5 |
4 |
2.5% |
0.02500 |
| 6 |
6 |
10 |
6.2% |
0.06250 |
| 7 |
7 |
13 |
8.1% |
0.08125 |
| 8 |
8 |
37 |
23.1% |
0.23125 |
| 9 |
9 |
37 |
23.1% |
0.23125 |
| 10 |
10 |
17 |
10.6% |
0.10625 |
| 11 |
11 - Very privileged |
20 |
12.5% |
0.12500 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7945 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
tactic(1) for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
tactic(1) for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
protest |
289 |
21.2% |
0.2125000 |
| 2 |
sabotage |
271 |
19.9% |
0.1992647 |
| 3 |
hostage taking |
281 |
20.7% |
0.2066176 |
| 4 |
shooting |
248 |
18.2% |
0.1823529 |
| 5 |
bombing |
271 |
19.9% |
0.1992647 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
target for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
target for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
a military facility |
214 |
15.7% |
0.1573529 |
| 2 |
a police station |
235 |
17.3% |
0.1727941 |
| 3 |
a school |
224 |
16.5% |
0.1647059 |
| 4 |
a church |
226 |
16.6% |
0.1661765 |
| 5 |
a mosque |
241 |
17.7% |
0.1772059 |
| 6 |
a synagogue |
220 |
16.2% |
0.1617647 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran4
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
persons for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
persons for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
364 |
26.8% |
0.2676471 |
| 2 |
One person |
333 |
24.5% |
0.2448529 |
| 3 |
Two people |
312 |
22.9% |
0.2294118 |
| 4 |
Ten people |
351 |
25.8% |
0.2580882 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran5
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Collects values from
r15pad_terror1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
tactic(2) for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the protest |
289 |
21.2% |
0.2125000 |
| 2 |
the sabotage |
271 |
19.9% |
0.1992647 |
| 3 |
the hostage taking |
281 |
20.7% |
0.2066176 |
| 4 |
the shooting |
248 |
18.2% |
0.1823529 |
| 5 |
the bombing |
271 |
19.9% |
0.1992647 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran6
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
adjective for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
adjective for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
one |
269 |
19.8% |
0.1977941 |
| 2 |
one Christian |
275 |
20.2% |
0.2022059 |
| 3 |
one Muslim |
273 |
20.1% |
0.2007353 |
| 4 |
one left-wing extremist |
257 |
18.9% |
0.1889706 |
| 5 |
one right-wing extremist |
286 |
21.0% |
0.2102941 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran7
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
subject for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
subject for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
organisation |
354 |
26.0% |
0.2602941 |
| 2 |
group |
350 |
25.7% |
0.2573529 |
| 3 |
individual |
328 |
24.1% |
0.2411765 |
| 4 |
individual of unsound mind |
328 |
24.1% |
0.2411765 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran8
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
motivation for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
motivation for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
there was no clear motivation behind the incident |
457 |
33.6% |
0.3360294 |
| 2 |
the incident was carried out with the aim of changing government policy |
440 |
32.4% |
0.3235294 |
| 3 |
the motivation behind the incident came from a hatred towards the target |
463 |
34.0% |
0.3404412 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_a
|
Variable label:
|
Terrorism experiment: Is the event a terrorist act.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Could you please now imagine that an incident has taken place in the
Nordic region and then consider some questions about the incident below.
The incident involves a [protest / sabotage / hostage taking / shooting
/ bombing] that targeted [a military facility / a police station /a
school / a church / a mosque / a synagogue ] in Norway. [Noone/One
person/Two people/Ten people] were killed in [the protest / the sabotage
/ the hostage taking / the shooting / the bombing], which was performed
by [one / one Christian / one Muslim / one left-wing extremist / one
right-wing extremist] [organisation / group / individual / individual of
unsound mind ]. News coverage suggests [there was no clear motivation
behind the incident / the incident was carried out with the aim of
changing government policy / the motivation behind the incident came
from a hatred towards the target ].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you classify this incident as an act of terrorism?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. Experiment. The respondent is presented with a
fictitious event. The description of the incident depends on randomized
values. See background variables.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, this is terrorism |
918 |
67.5% |
0.675000000 |
| 2 |
No, this is not terrorism |
432 |
31.8% |
0.317647059 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007352941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Detain
indefinately without trial.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have
the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hold people in custody as long as they want without charging them
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
89 |
6.5% |
0.065441176 |
| 2 |
Agree |
156 |
11.5% |
0.114705882 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
209 |
15.4% |
0.153676471 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
90 |
6.6% |
0.066176471 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
174 |
12.8% |
0.127941176 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
364 |
26.8% |
0.267647059 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
265 |
19.5% |
0.194852941 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
1.0% |
0.009558824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Wire tap
phone calls.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have
the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Listen in on people’s telephone conversations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
185 |
13.6% |
0.136029412 |
| 2 |
Agree |
344 |
25.3% |
0.252941176 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
367 |
27.0% |
0.269852941 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
99 |
7.3% |
0.072794118 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
141 |
10.4% |
0.103676471 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
136 |
10.0% |
0.100000000 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
76 |
5.6% |
0.055882353 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008823529 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Stop and
search people on the street.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have
the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Randomly stop and search people on the street
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
84 |
6.2% |
0.06176471 |
| 2 |
Agree |
174 |
12.8% |
0.12794118 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
293 |
21.5% |
0.21544118 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
131 |
9.6% |
0.09632353 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
172 |
12.6% |
0.12647059 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
305 |
22.4% |
0.22426471 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
185 |
13.6% |
0.13602941 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01176471 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Monitor
emails and internet communication.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have
the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Conduct surveillance of people’s Email and Internet communications
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
116 |
8.5% |
0.085294118 |
| 2 |
Agree |
235 |
17.3% |
0.172794118 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
371 |
27.3% |
0.272794118 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
139 |
10.2% |
0.102205882 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
175 |
12.9% |
0.128676471 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
190 |
14.0% |
0.139705882 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
122 |
9.0% |
0.089705882 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008823529 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may:
Monitor/bug rooms.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have
the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Conduct surveillance/wire tapping of rooms
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
111 |
8.2% |
0.08161765 |
| 2 |
Agree |
272 |
20.0% |
0.20000000 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
371 |
27.3% |
0.27279412 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
139 |
10.2% |
0.10220588 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
164 |
12.1% |
0.12058824 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
177 |
13.0% |
0.13014706 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
109 |
8.0% |
0.08014706 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.3% |
0.01250000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Cordon
off parts of the city.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have
the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cordon off parts of the city
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
165 |
12.1% |
0.12132353 |
| 2 |
Agree |
432 |
31.8% |
0.31764706 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
363 |
26.7% |
0.26691176 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
138 |
10.1% |
0.10147059 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
104 |
7.6% |
0.07647059 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
97 |
7.1% |
0.07132353 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
45 |
3.3% |
0.03308824 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01176471 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_7
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Let armed
police or the army patrol the streets.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have
the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let armed police or the army patrol the streets
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
227 |
16.7% |
0.166911765 |
| 2 |
Agree |
383 |
28.2% |
0.281617647 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
332 |
24.4% |
0.244117647 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
104 |
7.6% |
0.076470588 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
129 |
9.5% |
0.094852941 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
108 |
7.9% |
0.079411765 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
66 |
4.9% |
0.048529412 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008088235 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror2_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
victim for r15pad_terror2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
victim for r15pad_terror2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
you personally |
453 |
33.3% |
0.3330882 |
| 2 |
Norway |
451 |
33.2% |
0.3316176 |
| 3 |
Europe |
456 |
33.5% |
0.3352941 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror2_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects time
frame for r15pad_terror2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects time
frame for r15pad_terror2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
today |
680 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| 2 |
in the future |
680 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror2
|
Variable label:
|
How great threat is terrorism for [you/Europe][today/in the future]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Overall, how serious a threat do you perceive terrorism to be for [you
personally /Norway/Europe] [today/in the future]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on the values of r15pad_terror2_ran1 and r15pad_terror2_ran2. The values
are randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
89 |
6.5% |
0.0654411765 |
| 2 |
Serious |
330 |
24.3% |
0.2426470588 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
478 |
35.1% |
0.3514705882 |
| 4 |
Not very serious |
372 |
27.4% |
0.2735294118 |
| 5 |
Not a threat |
90 |
6.6% |
0.0661764706 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007352941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Preserving safety should limit individual freedoms.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree that the safeguarding of society’s security
should be at the expense of individuals’ freedom (such as protection of
privacy and the right to privacy)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
70 |
5.1% |
0.051470588 |
| 2 |
Agree |
245 |
18.0% |
0.180147059 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
504 |
37.1% |
0.370588235 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
109 |
8.0% |
0.080147059 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
183 |
13.5% |
0.134558824 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
166 |
12.2% |
0.122058824 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
78 |
5.7% |
0.057352941 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003676471 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror5
|
Variable label:
|
How important are counter-terrorist measures for you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important are anti-terrorism measures for you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
211 |
15.5% |
0.155147059 |
| 2 |
Importnat |
538 |
39.6% |
0.395588235 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
365 |
26.8% |
0.268382353 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
188 |
13.8% |
0.138235294 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
54 |
4.0% |
0.039705882 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002941176 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror6
|
Variable label:
|
Which party has the best counter-terrorism policies.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party do you think has the best policies aimed at
combating terrorist attacks in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
213 |
15.7% |
0.156617647 |
| 2 |
The Progress Party |
163 |
12.0% |
0.119852941 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party |
259 |
19.0% |
0.190441176 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
47 |
3.5% |
0.034558824 |
| 5 |
The Centre Party |
31 |
2.3% |
0.022794118 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democrats |
15 |
1.1% |
0.011029412 |
| 7 |
The Liberal Party |
14 |
1.0% |
0.010294118 |
| 8 |
The Red Party |
22 |
1.6% |
0.016176471 |
| 9 |
The Green Party |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003676471 |
| 10 |
Other (write here) |
35 |
2.6% |
0.025735294 |
| 11 |
None |
510 |
37.5% |
0.375000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
3.4% |
0.033823529 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror6_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R15PAD_TERROR6]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party do you think has the best policies aimed at
combating terrorist attacks in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15pad_terror8_1
|
Variable label:
|
How capable of handling terrorist attacks: International organizations.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In your opinion, how good or bad are the following actors in Norway
regarding their ability to deal with the risk of terrorist attacks?
|
|
Literal question:
|
International organizations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Extremely good |
14 |
1.0% |
0.01029412 |
| 2 |
Very good |
156 |
11.5% |
0.11470588 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
456 |
33.5% |
0.33529412 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
471 |
34.6% |
0.34632353 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
115 |
8.5% |
0.08455882 |
| 6 |
Very bad |
57 |
4.2% |
0.04191176 |
| 7 |
Extremely bad |
19 |
1.4% |
0.01397059 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
5.3% |
0.05294118 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror8_2
|
Variable label:
|
How capable of handling terrorist attacks: National authorities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In your opinion, how good or bad are the following actors in Norway
regarding their ability to deal with the risk of terrorist attacks?
|
|
Literal question:
|
National authorities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Extremely good |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008088235 |
| 2 |
Very good |
235 |
17.3% |
0.172794118 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
678 |
49.9% |
0.498529412 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
216 |
15.9% |
0.158823529 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
138 |
10.1% |
0.101470588 |
| 6 |
Very bad |
28 |
2.1% |
0.020588235 |
| 7 |
Extremely bad |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006617647 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
3.3% |
0.033088235 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror8_3
|
Variable label:
|
How capable of handling terrorist attacks: Local authorities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In your opinion, how good or bad are the following actors in Norway
regarding their ability to deal with the risk of terrorist attacks?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Local authorities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Extremely good |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003676471 |
| 2 |
Very good |
63 |
4.6% |
0.046323529 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
390 |
28.7% |
0.286764706 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
427 |
31.4% |
0.313970588 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
273 |
20.1% |
0.200735294 |
| 6 |
Very bad |
115 |
8.5% |
0.084558824 |
| 7 |
Extremely bad |
29 |
2.1% |
0.021323529 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
4.3% |
0.042647059 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror8_4
|
Variable label:
|
How capable of handling terrorist attacks: Police.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In your opinion, how good or bad are the following actors in Norway
regarding their ability to deal with the risk of terrorist attacks?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The police
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Extremely good |
24 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
| 2 |
Very good |
280 |
20.6% |
0.20588235 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
641 |
47.1% |
0.47132353 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
198 |
14.6% |
0.14558824 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
118 |
8.7% |
0.08676471 |
| 6 |
Very bad |
41 |
3.0% |
0.03014706 |
| 7 |
Extremely bad |
15 |
1.1% |
0.01102941 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
3.2% |
0.03161765 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror8_5
|
Variable label:
|
How capable of handling terrorist attacks: Voluntary organizations.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In your opinion, how good or bad are the following actors in Norway
regarding their ability to deal with the risk of terrorist attacks?
|
|
Literal question:
|
NGOs
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Extremely good |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005147059 |
| 2 |
Very good |
60 |
4.4% |
0.044117647 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
255 |
18.8% |
0.187500000 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
552 |
40.6% |
0.405882353 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
198 |
14.6% |
0.145588235 |
| 6 |
Very bad |
171 |
12.6% |
0.125735294 |
| 7 |
Extremely bad |
58 |
4.3% |
0.042647059 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
4.3% |
0.043382353 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror8_6
|
Variable label:
|
How capable of handling terrorist attacks: The individual citizen.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In your opinion, how good or bad are the following actors in Norway
regarding their ability to deal with the risk of terrorist attacks?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Individual citizens
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Extremely good |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005882353 |
| 2 |
Very good |
34 |
2.5% |
0.025000000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
197 |
14.5% |
0.144852941 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
489 |
36.0% |
0.359558824 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
256 |
18.8% |
0.188235294 |
| 6 |
Very bad |
225 |
16.5% |
0.165441176 |
| 7 |
Extremely bad |
99 |
7.3% |
0.072794118 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
3.8% |
0.038235294 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror10_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects event
for r15pad_terror10.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects event
for r15pad_terror10.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1351] [Invalid:6754]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
natural disasters |
686 |
50.8% |
0.507772 |
| 2 |
terrorist attacks |
665 |
49.2% |
0.492228 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6754 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror10
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: 100 million NOK per life saved on measures to limit damages
from [natural disasters/terrorist attacks].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Presently, there is great deal of attention focused on [natural
disasters/terrorist attacks]. The state can put various measures in
place to reduce the risk of [natural disasters/terrorist attacks], but
there is controversy over how much money the state should prioritize to
spend on such measures.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the state can expect to save one human life by spending NOK 100
million on measures to reduce the risk of [natural disasters/terrorist
attacks], do you think the state should prioritize these measures? These
measures should be carried out if they have to be funded through
increased taxes among the population?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on the values of r15pad_terror10_ran. The value is randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I support it very strongly |
97 |
7.1% |
0.07132353 |
| 2 |
I support it strongly |
230 |
16.9% |
0.16911765 |
| 3 |
I support it somewhat |
363 |
26.7% |
0.26691176 |
| 4 |
I neither support it nor oppose it |
316 |
23.2% |
0.23235294 |
| 5 |
I oppose it somewhat |
205 |
15.1% |
0.15073529 |
| 6 |
I oppose it strongly |
94 |
6.9% |
0.06911765 |
| 7 |
I oppose it very strongly |
25 |
1.8% |
0.01838235 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
2.2% |
0.02205882 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror11pre
|
Variable label:
|
How has immigration from muslim countries affected the risk of terrorist
attacks in the receiving countries.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Over the past twenty years, there have been high levels of immigration
from Muslim countries in Africa, Asia and the Middle East to Europe.
There are differences in how strict certain countries are regarding
their immigration policies. There are also differences regarding which
countries Muslims typically prefer to emigrate to. By gathering large
amounts of data, researchers can use these differences to study the
correlation between Muslim immigration and terrorism. A US research team
recently used data from 174 countries during the period of 1995-2015 to
study how the probability of terrorism changed as a result of increased
immigration from Muslim countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
During the period of 1995-2015, how do you think increased immigration
from Muslim-majority countries influenced recipient countries?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It led to a lot more terrorism |
141 |
10.4% |
0.103676471 |
| 2 |
It led to somewhat more terrorism |
510 |
37.5% |
0.375000000 |
| 3 |
It did not lead to any more or any less terrorism |
649 |
47.7% |
0.477205882 |
| 4 |
It led to less terrorism |
26 |
1.9% |
0.019117647 |
| 5 |
It led to a lot less terrorism |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005147059 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2.0% |
0.019852941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror11_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects if
the respondent is shown a text prior to answering r15pad_terror11posta.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects if
the respondent is shown a text prior to answering r15pad_terror11posta.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1343] [Invalid:6762]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
For your information, the researchers who analysed the correlation between
immigration from Muslim countries and terrorist attacks in recipient countries,
found that increased Muslim immigration had no impact on terrorism in recipient
countries. |
691 |
51.5% |
0.5145197 |
| 2 |
[Control] |
652 |
48.5% |
0.4854803 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6762 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror11_usedback
|
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent has used the
back button.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent has used the
back button.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:56] [Invalid:8049]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Back button used |
56 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8049 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror11posta
|
Variable label:
|
Will the risk of terrorist attacks in Norway increase if we accept more
immigrants from muslim countries.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Blank / For your information, the researchers who analysed the
correlation between immigration from Muslim countries and terrorist
attacks in recipient countries, found that increased Muslim immigration
had no impact on terrorism in recipient countries.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Over the next ten years, do you think the risk of terror in Norway will
increase if we choose to accept more immigrants from Muslim countries in
Africa, Asia and the Middle East? The risk of terror will…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. If r15pad_terror11_ran = 1, the respondent was
shown a text before the question was asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Increase greatly |
86 |
6.3% |
0.063235294 |
| 2 |
Increase |
207 |
15.2% |
0.152205882 |
| 3 |
Increase somewhat |
385 |
28.3% |
0.283088235 |
| 4 |
Neither increase nor decrease |
633 |
46.5% |
0.465441176 |
| 5 |
Decrease somewhat |
14 |
1.0% |
0.010294118 |
| 6 |
Decrease |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007352941 |
| 7 |
Decrease greatly |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001470588 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.7% |
0.016911765 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror11postb
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norway accept more of fewer immigrants than today?
|
|
Literal question:
|
There is an ongoing debate in Norway about how many refugees we should
receive. Do you think Norway should receive more or fewer refugees than
it does today?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. If r15pad_terror11_ran = 1, the respondent was
shown a text before the question was asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Receive many more |
39 |
2.9% |
0.02867647 |
| 2 |
Receive more |
188 |
13.8% |
0.13823529 |
| 3 |
Receive a few more |
282 |
20.7% |
0.20735294 |
| 4 |
Neither receive any more nor any less |
385 |
28.3% |
0.28308824 |
| 5 |
Receive a few less |
173 |
12.7% |
0.12720588 |
| 6 |
Receive fewer |
136 |
10.0% |
0.10000000 |
| 7 |
Receive many fewer |
126 |
9.3% |
0.09264706 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.3% |
0.02279412 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror11postc
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norway should reduce the share of immigrants with muslim
backgrounds.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people believe Norway should reduce the proportion of Muslim
refugees we receive.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should reduce the
proportion of refugees with Muslim backgrounds?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. If r15pad_terror11_ran = 1, the respondent was
shown a text before the question was asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
156 |
11.5% |
0.11470588 |
| 2 |
Agree |
146 |
10.7% |
0.10735294 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
226 |
16.6% |
0.16617647 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
312 |
22.9% |
0.22941176 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
144 |
10.6% |
0.10588235 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
221 |
16.2% |
0.16250000 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
131 |
9.6% |
0.09632353 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15tdr1
|
Variable label:
|
Where did you grow up?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where did you grow up?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-20]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Østfold |
61 |
4.5% |
0.044525547 |
| 2 |
Akershus |
113 |
8.2% |
0.082481752 |
| 3 |
Oslo |
139 |
10.1% |
0.101459854 |
| 4 |
Hedmark |
43 |
3.1% |
0.031386861 |
| 5 |
Oppland |
49 |
3.6% |
0.035766423 |
| 6 |
Buskerud |
52 |
3.8% |
0.037956204 |
| 7 |
Vestfold |
45 |
3.3% |
0.032846715 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
47 |
3.4% |
0.034306569 |
| 9 |
Aust-Agder |
33 |
2.4% |
0.024087591 |
| 10 |
Vest-Agder |
50 |
3.6% |
0.036496350 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
111 |
8.1% |
0.081021898 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
165 |
12.0% |
0.120437956 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
47 |
3.4% |
0.034306569 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
67 |
4.9% |
0.048905109 |
| 15 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
78 |
5.7% |
0.056934307 |
| 16 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
21 |
1.5% |
0.015328467 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
87 |
6.4% |
0.063503650 |
| 18 |
Troms |
63 |
4.6% |
0.045985401 |
| 19 |
Finnmark |
16 |
1.2% |
0.011678832 |
| 20 |
Other |
81 |
5.9% |
0.059124088 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001459854 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr1_20_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R15TDR1].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where did you grow up?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15tdr2
|
Variable label:
|
How many years have you lived in the country you live in now.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many years have you lived in the county you now live in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1366] [Invalid:6739]
[Range:0-90]
|
r15tdr3_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
region for r15tdr3_5.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
region for r15tdr3_5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1370] [Invalid:6735]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Scandinavia |
685 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| 2 |
The Nordic countries |
685 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr3_1
|
Variable label:
|
How strong affinity to: Your municipality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please could you say something about what sort of affinity you have to
each of the following entities:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strong is your affinity to the municipality you live in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong affinity |
553 |
40.4% |
0.403649635 |
| 2 |
Affinity |
522 |
38.1% |
0.381021898 |
| 3 |
Some affinity |
190 |
13.9% |
0.138686131 |
| 4 |
No particular affinity |
82 |
6.0% |
0.059854015 |
| 5 |
No affinity at all |
20 |
1.5% |
0.014598540 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001459854 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr3_2
|
Variable label:
|
How strong affinity to: Your county.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please could you say something about what sort of affinity you have to
each of the following entities:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strong is your affinity to the county you live in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong affinity |
434 |
31.7% |
0.316788321 |
| 2 |
Affinity |
516 |
37.7% |
0.376642336 |
| 3 |
Some affinity |
255 |
18.6% |
0.186131387 |
| 4 |
No particular affinity |
121 |
8.8% |
0.088321168 |
| 5 |
No affinity at all |
32 |
2.3% |
0.023357664 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008759124 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr3_3
|
Variable label:
|
How strong affinity to: Your region of the country.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please could you say something about what sort of affinity you have to
each of the following entities:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strong is your affinity to the region of the country you live in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong affinity |
624 |
45.5% |
0.455474453 |
| 2 |
Affinity |
486 |
35.5% |
0.354744526 |
| 3 |
Some affinity |
169 |
12.3% |
0.123357664 |
| 4 |
No particular affinity |
58 |
4.2% |
0.042335766 |
| 5 |
No affinity at all |
19 |
1.4% |
0.013868613 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr3_4
|
Variable label:
|
How strong affinity to: Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please could you say something about what sort of affinity you have to
each of the following entities:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strong is your affinity to Noway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong affinity |
1009 |
73.6% |
0.736496350 |
| 2 |
Affinity |
286 |
20.9% |
0.208759124 |
| 3 |
Some affinity |
52 |
3.8% |
0.037956204 |
| 4 |
No particular affinity |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005109489 |
| 5 |
No affinity at all |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002189781 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008759124 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr3_5
|
Variable label:
|
How strong affinity to: [Scandinavia/The Nordic countries].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please could you say something about what sort of affinity you have to
each of the following entities:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strong is your affinity to [Scandinavia/The Nordic countries]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. The wording of the question depends on the
randomized value of r15tdr3_ran. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong affinity |
462 |
33.7% |
0.337226277 |
| 2 |
Affinity |
618 |
45.1% |
0.451094891 |
| 3 |
Some affinity |
219 |
16.0% |
0.159854015 |
| 4 |
No particular affinity |
42 |
3.1% |
0.030656934 |
| 5 |
No affinity at all |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007299270 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004379562 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr3_7
|
Variable label:
|
How strong affinity to: Europe.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please could you say something about what sort of affinity you have to
each of the following entities:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strong is your affinity to Europe?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong affinity |
389 |
28.4% |
0.283941606 |
| 2 |
Affinity |
585 |
42.7% |
0.427007299 |
| 3 |
Some affinity |
277 |
20.2% |
0.202189781 |
| 4 |
No particular affinity |
80 |
5.8% |
0.058394161 |
| 5 |
No affinity at all |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr4a
|
Variable label:
|
Do you have one or more geographical identities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We all have different identities. Identity can, among other things, be
related to gender, age, class, religion and profession. Many also have
identities related to a geographical area such as a district, city,
municipality, county or region of the country.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have one or more of these geographical identities?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
890 |
65.0% |
0.649635036 |
| 2 |
No |
473 |
34.5% |
0.345255474 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005109489 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr4b
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R15TDR4A].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please could you say something about which geographic identities you
have? - You can mention more than one if you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6 and r15tdr4a = 1. ] [Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15tdr5
|
Variable label:
|
How interested in local politics.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how interested are you in local politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
137 |
10.0% |
0.100000000 |
| 2 |
Interested |
654 |
47.7% |
0.477372263 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
401 |
29.3% |
0.292700730 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
148 |
10.8% |
0.108029197 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
29 |
2.1% |
0.021167883 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr6
|
Variable label:
|
How interested in county politics.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how interested are you in county politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
56 |
4.1% |
0.040875912 |
| 2 |
Interested |
396 |
28.9% |
0.289051095 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
515 |
37.6% |
0.375912409 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
332 |
24.2% |
0.242335766 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
64 |
4.7% |
0.046715328 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005109489 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr7_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important to vote: Municipal elections.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important is it for you to vote in…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Municipal elections
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important to vote |
827 |
60.4% |
0.603649635 |
| 2 |
Important to vote |
373 |
27.2% |
0.272262774 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important to vote |
93 |
6.8% |
0.067883212 |
| 4 |
Not very important to vote |
56 |
4.1% |
0.040875912 |
| 5 |
Not important to vote at all |
15 |
1.1% |
0.010948905 |
| 6 |
I do not have the right to vote |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002919708 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001459854 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr7_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important to vote: County elections.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important is it for you to vote in…
|
|
Literal question:
|
County council elections
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important to vote |
556 |
40.6% |
0.405839416 |
| 2 |
Important to vote |
415 |
30.3% |
0.302919708 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important to vote |
192 |
14.0% |
0.140145985 |
| 4 |
Not very important to vote |
145 |
10.6% |
0.105839416 |
| 5 |
Not important to vote at all |
41 |
3.0% |
0.029927007 |
| 6 |
I do not have the right to vote |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008029197 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007299270 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr8a
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for this party if municipal elections next week.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Local elections will take place this September (municipal council and
county council elections).
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were municipal elections next
week?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
56 |
4.1% |
0.040875912 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
272 |
19.9% |
0.198540146 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
82 |
6.0% |
0.059854015 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
53 |
3.9% |
0.038686131 |
| 5 |
The Social Left Party |
93 |
6.8% |
0.067883212 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
160 |
11.7% |
0.116788321 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
81 |
5.9% |
0.059124088 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
308 |
22.5% |
0.224817518 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
85 |
6.2% |
0.062043796 |
| 10 |
A joint list |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
| 11 |
A local list |
26 |
1.9% |
0.018978102 |
| 12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
35 |
2.6% |
0.025547445 |
| 13 |
Would not vote |
22 |
1.6% |
0.016058394 |
| 14 |
Not entitled to vote |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004379562 |
| 15 |
Other: |
77 |
5.6% |
0.056204380 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr8a_15_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R15TDR8A]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Local elections will take place this September (municipal council and
county council elections).
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were municipal elections next
week?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15tdr8b
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for this party if county elections next week.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were county council elections
next week?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
53 |
3.9% |
0.038686131 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
267 |
19.5% |
0.194890511 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
77 |
5.6% |
0.056204380 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
43 |
3.1% |
0.031386861 |
| 5 |
The Social Left Party |
89 |
6.5% |
0.064963504 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
150 |
10.9% |
0.109489051 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
78 |
5.7% |
0.056934307 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
316 |
23.1% |
0.230656934 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
79 |
5.8% |
0.057664234 |
| 10 |
A joint list |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
| 11 |
A local list |
18 |
1.3% |
0.013138686 |
| 12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
43 |
3.1% |
0.031386861 |
| 13 |
Would not vote |
53 |
3.9% |
0.038686131 |
| 14 |
Not entitled to vote |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007299270 |
| 15 |
Other: |
75 |
5.5% |
0.054744526 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.3% |
0.013138686 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr8b_15_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R15TDR8B]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were county council elections
next week?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15tdr9_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you: Decisions made by municipal government.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public tasks are resolved at different levels in Norway. Some of the
most important municipal tasks are primary and lower secondary schools,
kindergartens, primary healthcare, care and nursing, public transport
and a variety of technical services: sewage, drains, water and waste
disposal. The county authorities are responsible for upper secondary
education and regional development, while central authorities are
responsible for the police, defence, higher education and a variety of
social security services. Based on this, how important are the decisions
made at the different levels for you personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important are the decisions made by the municipal council for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
529 |
38.6% |
0.386131387 |
| 2 |
Important |
618 |
45.1% |
0.451094891 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
168 |
12.3% |
0.122627737 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
42 |
3.1% |
0.030656934 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005839416 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003649635 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr9_4
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you: Decisions made by county government.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public tasks are resolved at different levels in Norway. Some of the
most important municipal tasks are primary and lower secondary schools,
kindergartens, primary healthcare, care and nursing, public transport
and a variety of technical services: sewage, drains, water and waste
disposal. The county authorities are responsible for upper secondary
education and regional development, while central authorities are
responsible for the police, defence, higher education and a variety of
social security services. Based on this, how important are the decisions
made at the different levels for you personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important are the decisions made by the county council for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
213 |
15.5% |
0.155474453 |
| 2 |
Important |
580 |
42.3% |
0.423357664 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
402 |
29.3% |
0.293430657 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
154 |
11.2% |
0.112408759 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008759124 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006569343 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr9_6
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you: Decisions made by Parliament.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public tasks are resolved at different levels in Norway. Some of the
most important municipal tasks are primary and lower secondary schools,
kindergartens, primary healthcare, care and nursing, public transport
and a variety of technical services: sewage, drains, water and waste
disposal. The county authorities are responsible for upper secondary
education and regional development, while central authorities are
responsible for the police, defence, higher education and a variety of
social security services. Based on this, how important are the decisions
made at the different levels for you personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important are the decisions made by the Norwegian Parliament for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
479 |
35.0% |
0.349635036 |
| 2 |
Important |
635 |
46.4% |
0.463503650 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
199 |
14.5% |
0.145255474 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
38 |
2.8% |
0.027737226 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005839416 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008029197 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr10_2
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with services from: Municipality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the previous question, task allocation between the levels of
governance in Norway was presented, we wish to repeat this before the
next question: Public tasks are resolved at different levels in Norway.
Some of the most important municipal tasks are primary and lower
secondary schools, kindergartens, primary healthcare, care and nursing,
public transport and a variety of technical services: sewage, drains,
water and waste disposal. The county authorities are responsible for
upper secondary education, dental health and regional development, while
central authorities are responsible for the police, defence, higher
education and a variety of social security services. Based on this, how
satisfied are you with the services provided at the different levels?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the services provided by your municipality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
127 |
9.3% |
0.092700730 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
761 |
55.5% |
0.555474453 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
357 |
26.1% |
0.260583942 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
84 |
6.1% |
0.061313869 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
15 |
1.1% |
0.010948905 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
18 |
1.3% |
0.013138686 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005839416 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr10_4
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with services from: County.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the previous question, task allocation between the levels of
governance in Norway was presented, we wish to repeat this before the
next question: Public tasks are resolved at different levels in Norway.
Some of the most important municipal tasks are primary and lower
secondary schools, kindergartens, primary healthcare, care and nursing,
public transport and a variety of technical services: sewage, drains,
water and waste disposal. The county authorities are responsible for
upper secondary education, dental health and regional development, while
central authorities are responsible for the police, defence, higher
education and a variety of social security services. Based on this, how
satisfied are you with the services provided at the different levels?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the services provided by your county
authority?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
36 |
2.6% |
0.026277372 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
575 |
42.0% |
0.419708029 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
484 |
35.3% |
0.353284672 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
108 |
7.9% |
0.078832117 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
25 |
1.8% |
0.018248175 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
131 |
9.6% |
0.095620438 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008029197 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr10_6
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with services from: State.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the previous question, task allocation between the levels of
governance in Norway was presented, we wish to repeat this before the
next question: Public tasks are resolved at different levels in Norway.
Some of the most important municipal tasks are primary and lower
secondary schools, kindergartens, primary healthcare, care and nursing,
public transport and a variety of technical services: sewage, drains,
water and waste disposal. The county authorities are responsible for
upper secondary education, dental health and regional development, while
central authorities are responsible for the police, defence, higher
education and a variety of social security services. Based on this, how
satisfied are you with the services provided at the different levels?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the services provided by the state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
47 |
3.4% |
0.034306569 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
614 |
44.8% |
0.448175182 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
508 |
37.1% |
0.370802920 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
143 |
10.4% |
0.104379562 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
31 |
2.3% |
0.022627737 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
16 |
1.2% |
0.011678832 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008029197 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr11
|
Variable label:
|
Municipalities should have more, fewer, or as many tasks as today.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
From the 1st of January 2020, Norway will receive a new municipal and
county structure. Many municipalities and county authorities will be
merged. The distribution of tasks between the administrative levels will
also change somewhat as a result of these reforms. If one level is
assigned certain new tasks, it usually means that another level loses
responsibility for certain tasks.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following assertions is closest to your point of view:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Municipalities should receive fewer tasks |
246 |
18.0% |
0.179562044 |
| 2 |
The distribution of tasks between state, county authority and municipality
should remain as it is today |
431 |
31.5% |
0.314598540 |
| 3 |
Municipalities should receive more tasks |
389 |
28.4% |
0.283941606 |
| 4 |
Don't know |
292 |
21.3% |
0.213138686 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008759124 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr12
|
Variable label:
|
Counties should have more, fewer, as many tasks as today, or be shut
down.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following assertions is closest to your point of view:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
County authorities should receive fewer tasks |
195 |
14.2% |
0.14233577 |
| 2 |
The distribution of tasks between state, county authority and municipality
should remain as it is today |
347 |
25.3% |
0.25328467 |
| 3 |
County authorities should receive more tasks |
180 |
13.1% |
0.13138686 |
| 4 |
County authorities should be closed down |
333 |
24.3% |
0.24306569 |
| 5 |
Don't know |
296 |
21.6% |
0.21605839 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.4% |
0.01386861 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr13
|
Variable label:
|
Most important reason for party choice in municipal elections.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why people vote for a particular political
party or party list during elections.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Regarding the municipal elections in September, which of the four
considerations mentioned below will be most important to you when you
decide on which political party or party list to vote for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Local issues |
563 |
41.1% |
0.41094891 |
| 2 |
Candidates on the party list |
138 |
10.1% |
0.10072993 |
| 3 |
National issues |
219 |
16.0% |
0.15985401 |
| 4 |
General confidence in the party/party list |
434 |
31.7% |
0.31678832 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01167883 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr14
|
Variable label:
|
How great trust in municipality politicians.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence would you say you have in municipal politicians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
23 |
1.7% |
0.016788321 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
415 |
30.3% |
0.302919708 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
689 |
50.3% |
0.502919708 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
196 |
14.3% |
0.143065693 |
| 5 |
No confidence at all |
34 |
2.5% |
0.024817518 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr15_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Randomly selects either r15tdr15a or r15tdr15b.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Randomly selects either r15tdr15a or r15tdr15b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
What is important in order for you to have confidence in municipal politicians? |
687 |
50.5% |
0.5051471 |
| 2 |
What would you say creates the mistrust of municipal politicians? |
673 |
49.5% |
0.4948529 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15tdr15a
|
Variable label:
|
What is important for you to have trust in municipality politicians
[Open].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is important in order for you to have confidence in municipal
politicians?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. We wish to receive all
kinds of answers, a few sentences or just a few words if you would
prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6 and r15tdr15_ran = 1. ] [Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15tdr15b
|
Variable label:
|
What creates lack of trust in municipality politicians [Open]. [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What would you say creates the mistrust of municipal politicians?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. We wish to receive all
kinds of answers, a few sentences or just a few words if you would
prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6 and r15tdr15_ran = 2. ] [Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15tdr16
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of economic situation in Norway today.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway? Do you
believe it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
491 |
35.8% |
0.358394161 |
| 2 |
Good |
688 |
50.2% |
0.502189781 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
110 |
8.0% |
0.080291971 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
41 |
3.0% |
0.029927007 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
21 |
1.5% |
0.015328467 |
| 6 |
Bad |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002919708 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001459854 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr17
|
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in [region of country] compared with the rest of
Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation [in your region of the country]
with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation [in your region
of the country] as better, worse or the same?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Better |
432 |
31.5% |
0.31532847 |
| 2 |
Worse |
190 |
13.9% |
0.13868613 |
| 3 |
The same |
726 |
53.0% |
0.52992701 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.6% |
0.01605839 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr18
|
Variable label:
|
Central authorities should intervene to even out economic differences
between parts of the country.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Central authorities should intervene with measures to even out economic
inequalities that exist between different parts of the country?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
224 |
16.4% |
0.16350365 |
| 2 |
Agree |
459 |
33.5% |
0.33503650 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
372 |
27.2% |
0.27153285 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
157 |
11.5% |
0.11459854 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
78 |
5.7% |
0.05693431 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
47 |
3.4% |
0.03430657 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01313869 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr19
|
Variable label:
|
Economic resources should be transferred from rich to poor parts of the
country to secure equal quality of public services.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the
country to parts that are not so rich to ensure that everyone receives
public services of the same quality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
242 |
17.7% |
0.17664234 |
| 2 |
Agree |
472 |
34.5% |
0.34452555 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
378 |
27.6% |
0.27591241 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
132 |
9.6% |
0.09635036 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
77 |
5.6% |
0.05620438 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
28 |
2.0% |
0.02043796 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01313869 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.7% |
0.01678832 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr20a
|
Variable label:
|
Has your municipality recently been or is about to be merged with
neighboring municipalities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Has your municipality recently been merged with one or more neighbouring
municipalities? (or will be merged from 2020)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
476 |
34.7% |
0.34744526 |
| 2 |
No |
776 |
56.6% |
0.56642336 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
102 |
7.4% |
0.07445255 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01167883 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr20b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Good that my municipality has been/is being merged with
neighboring municipalities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is good that my municipality has/will be merged with one or more
neighbouring municipalities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6 and r15tdr20a = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
76 |
16.0% |
0.159663866 |
| 2 |
Agree |
111 |
23.3% |
0.233193277 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
73 |
15.3% |
0.153361345 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
80 |
16.8% |
0.168067227 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
52 |
10.9% |
0.109243697 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
40 |
8.4% |
0.084033613 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
42 |
8.8% |
0.088235294 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.4% |
0.004201681 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7629 |
|
NA |
r15tdr20c
|
Variable label:
|
Has your county recently been or is about to be merged with neighboring
counties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Has your county authority recently been merged with one or more
neighbouring county authorities? (or will be merged from 2020)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
773 |
56.4% |
0.56423358 |
| 2 |
No |
392 |
28.6% |
0.28613139 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
184 |
13.4% |
0.13430657 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.5% |
0.01532847 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr20d
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Good that my county has been/is being merged with
neighboring counties.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is good that my county authority will be merged with one or more
county authorities.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6 and r15tdr20c = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
89 |
11.5% |
0.115135834 |
| 2 |
Agree |
137 |
17.7% |
0.177231565 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
96 |
12.4% |
0.124191462 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
129 |
16.7% |
0.166882277 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
70 |
9.1% |
0.090556274 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
103 |
13.3% |
0.133247089 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
142 |
18.4% |
0.183699871 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.9% |
0.009055627 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7332 |
|
NA |
r15tdr21a
|
Variable label:
|
How important to vote in general elections.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is it for you to vote in the general election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important to vote |
902 |
65.8% |
0.658394161 |
| 2 |
Important to vote |
316 |
23.1% |
0.230656934 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important to vote |
49 |
3.6% |
0.035766423 |
| 4 |
Not very important to vote |
29 |
2.1% |
0.021167883 |
| 5 |
Not important to vote at all |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006569343 |
| 6 |
I do not have the right to vote |
48 |
3.5% |
0.035036496 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.2% |
0.012408759 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr21b
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if parliamentary elections next week.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there was a general election next
week?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
48 |
3.5% |
0.03503650 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
268 |
19.6% |
0.19562044 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
96 |
7.0% |
0.07007299 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
44 |
3.2% |
0.03211679 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
100 |
7.3% |
0.07299270 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
181 |
13.2% |
0.13211679 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
68 |
5.0% |
0.04963504 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
306 |
22.3% |
0.22335766 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
94 |
6.9% |
0.06861314 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
15 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02408759 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
31 |
2.3% |
0.02262774 |
| 13 |
Other: |
59 |
4.3% |
0.04306569 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2.0% |
0.01970803 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr21b_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other [R15TDR21B]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there was a general election next
week?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15pk6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Christian democratic party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
914 |
16.9% |
0.16944753 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1160 |
21.5% |
0.21505376 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1283 |
23.8% |
0.23785688 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
905 |
16.8% |
0.16777901 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
750 |
13.9% |
0.13904338 |
| 6 |
Really like |
193 |
3.6% |
0.03578050 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
56 |
1.0% |
0.01038191 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
133 |
2.5% |
0.02465703 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Conservative party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
326 |
6.0% |
0.06043752 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
808 |
15.0% |
0.14979607 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1009 |
18.7% |
0.18705970 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
660 |
12.2% |
0.12235818 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1282 |
23.8% |
0.23767149 |
| 6 |
Really like |
977 |
18.1% |
0.18112718 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
204 |
3.8% |
0.03781980 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
128 |
2.4% |
0.02373007 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Progress party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1759 |
32.6% |
0.32610308 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1022 |
18.9% |
0.18946978 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
775 |
14.4% |
0.14367816 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
469 |
8.7% |
0.08694846 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
769 |
14.3% |
0.14256581 |
| 6 |
Really like |
382 |
7.1% |
0.07081943 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
92 |
1.7% |
0.01705599 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
126 |
2.3% |
0.02335929 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Liberal party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
601 |
11.1% |
0.111420096 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
889 |
16.5% |
0.164812755 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1212 |
22.5% |
0.224694105 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1224 |
22.7% |
0.226918799 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1043 |
19.3% |
0.193362996 |
| 6 |
Really like |
239 |
4.4% |
0.044308491 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
40 |
0.7% |
0.007415647 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
146 |
2.7% |
0.027067112 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Socialist left party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
674 |
12.5% |
0.12495365 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
862 |
16.0% |
0.15980719 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
855 |
15.9% |
0.15850945 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
964 |
17.9% |
0.17871709 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1074 |
19.9% |
0.19911012 |
| 6 |
Really like |
646 |
12.0% |
0.11976270 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
188 |
3.5% |
0.03485354 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
131 |
2.4% |
0.02428624 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Centre party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
285 |
5.3% |
0.05283648 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
569 |
10.5% |
0.10548758 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
919 |
17.0% |
0.17037449 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1200 |
22.2% |
0.22246941 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1426 |
26.4% |
0.26436782 |
| 6 |
Really like |
666 |
12.3% |
0.12347052 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
193 |
3.6% |
0.03578050 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
136 |
2.5% |
0.02521320 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Green party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
914 |
16.9% |
0.16944753 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
723 |
13.4% |
0.13403782 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
848 |
15.7% |
0.15721172 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
844 |
15.6% |
0.15647015 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1235 |
22.9% |
0.22895810 |
| 6 |
Really like |
554 |
10.3% |
0.10270671 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
143 |
2.7% |
0.02651094 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
133 |
2.5% |
0.02465703 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Labour party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
264 |
4.9% |
0.04894327 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
469 |
8.7% |
0.08694846 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
960 |
17.8% |
0.17797553 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
802 |
14.9% |
0.14868372 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1544 |
28.6% |
0.28624397 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1018 |
18.9% |
0.18872822 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
204 |
3.8% |
0.03781980 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
133 |
2.5% |
0.02465703 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Red party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1104 |
20.5% |
0.20467186 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
801 |
14.8% |
0.14849833 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
731 |
13.6% |
0.13552095 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
967 |
17.9% |
0.17927327 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1011 |
18.7% |
0.18743048 |
| 6 |
Really like |
472 |
8.8% |
0.08750463 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
167 |
3.1% |
0.03096033 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
141 |
2.6% |
0.02614016 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_1
|
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Afforestation contributes to reducing
global warming.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate
change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway
to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically
carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees
grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in
their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants,
soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that
still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then
ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change.
We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or
incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based
on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Afforestation helps to reduce global warming.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The
respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible
(r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think this is probably right |
530 |
62.6% |
0.626477541 |
| 2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
39 |
4.6% |
0.046099291 |
| 3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
232 |
27.4% |
0.274231678 |
| 4 |
Don't know |
38 |
4.5% |
0.044917258 |
| 5 |
No response |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001182033 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007092199 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7259 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_2
|
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Afforestation in Norway can bind as much
climate gas as the Norwegian energy industry produces.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate
change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway
to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically
carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees
grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in
their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants,
soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that
still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then
ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change.
We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or
incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based
on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Afforestation in Norway can absorb as much greenhouse gas annually as is
emitted from Norwegian energy production.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The
respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible
(r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think this is probably right |
120 |
14.9% |
0.148883375 |
| 2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
154 |
19.1% |
0.191066998 |
| 3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
418 |
51.9% |
0.518610422 |
| 4 |
Don't know |
96 |
11.9% |
0.119106700 |
| 5 |
No response |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003722084 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
1.9% |
0.018610422 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7299 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_3
|
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Afforestation has no negative
consequences for climate and environment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate
change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway
to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically
carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees
grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in
their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants,
soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that
still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then
ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change.
We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or
incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based
on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Afforestation to help the climate has no negative consequences for
nature and the environment.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The
respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible
(r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think this is probably right |
364 |
45.0% |
0.450495050 |
| 2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
110 |
13.6% |
0.136138614 |
| 3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
267 |
33.0% |
0.330445545 |
| 4 |
Don't know |
53 |
6.6% |
0.065594059 |
| 5 |
No response |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003712871 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.4% |
0.013613861 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7297 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_4
|
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Planted forest binds more climate gas
than other nature types.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate
change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway
to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically
carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees
grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in
their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants,
soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that
still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then
ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change.
We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or
incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based
on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Planted spruce forests have a greater ability to absorb and store
greenhouse gases than other types of nature (e.g. natural forests,
marshland, open cultivated landscapes).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The
respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible
(r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think this is probably right |
170 |
20.7% |
0.207317073 |
| 2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
123 |
15.0% |
0.150000000 |
| 3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
421 |
51.3% |
0.513414634 |
| 4 |
Don't know |
94 |
11.5% |
0.114634146 |
| 5 |
No response |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002439024 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
1.2% |
0.012195122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7285 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_5
|
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Natural forests have equal gas-binding
capabilities as planted forests.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate
change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway
to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically
carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees
grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in
their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants,
soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that
still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then
ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change.
We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or
incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based
on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Today, open areas in Norway are becoming overgrown with mixed forests.
These natural forests have the same capacity to absorb and store
greenhouse gases as planted pine forests.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The
respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible
(r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think this is probably right |
275 |
33.3% |
0.333333333 |
| 2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
72 |
8.7% |
0.087272727 |
| 3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
374 |
45.3% |
0.453333333 |
| 4 |
Don't know |
92 |
11.2% |
0.111515152 |
| 5 |
No response |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003636364 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.1% |
0.010909091 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7280 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_6
|
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: In forests, more gas is bound
underground than in wood over the ground.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate
change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway
to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically
carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees
grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in
their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants,
soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that
still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then
ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change.
We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or
incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based
on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In forests, larger amounts of greenhouse gases are trapped and bound
underground, in roots and soil, than in the wood of trees above the
ground.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The
respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible
(r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think this is probably right |
144 |
18.3% |
0.182509506 |
| 2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
80 |
10.1% |
0.101394170 |
| 3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
430 |
54.5% |
0.544993663 |
| 4 |
Don't know |
119 |
15.1% |
0.150823828 |
| 5 |
No response |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002534854 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.8% |
0.017743980 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7316 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_7
|
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Natural forests have greater
biodiversity than planted forests.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate
change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway
to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically
carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees
grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in
their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants,
soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that
still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then
ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change.
We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or
incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based
on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Natural forests have a greater diversity of plants and animals
(biodiversity) than planted forests.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The
respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible
(r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think this is probably right |
575 |
67.9% |
0.678866588 |
| 2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
44 |
5.2% |
0.051948052 |
| 3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
165 |
19.5% |
0.194805195 |
| 4 |
Don't know |
49 |
5.8% |
0.057851240 |
| 5 |
No response |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002361275 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.4% |
0.014167651 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7258 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_8
|
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Planted spruce forest has equal
biodiversity to open cultural landscapes.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate
change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway
to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically
carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees
grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in
their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants,
soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that
still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then
ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change.
We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or
incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based
on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Planted spruce forests have just as much diversity regarding plants and
animals as open cultivated landscapes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The
respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible
(r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think this is probably right |
115 |
14.2% |
0.141800247 |
| 2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
348 |
42.9% |
0.429099877 |
| 3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
256 |
31.6% |
0.315659679 |
| 4 |
Don't know |
79 |
9.7% |
0.097410604 |
| 5 |
No response |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001233046 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.5% |
0.014796547 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7294 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_9
|
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Afforestation in Norway is an beneficial
to the climate as planting it in tropical regions.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate
change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway
to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically
carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees
grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in
their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants,
soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that
still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then
ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change.
We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or
incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based
on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Planting forests in Norway has the same climate benefits as planting
forests in tropical regions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The
respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible
(r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think this is probably right |
163 |
20.1% |
0.200738916 |
| 2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
172 |
21.2% |
0.211822660 |
| 3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
361 |
44.5% |
0.444581281 |
| 4 |
Don't know |
102 |
12.6% |
0.125615764 |
| 5 |
No response |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003694581 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.4% |
0.013546798 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7293 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_b
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: Afforestation in Norway to reduce climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, do you support or oppose the planting of forests in
Norway to reduce climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly oppose |
23 |
1.2% |
0.01244589 |
| 2 |
Oppose |
77 |
4.2% |
0.04166667 |
| 3 |
Somewhat oppose |
110 |
6.0% |
0.05952381 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
458 |
24.8% |
0.24783550 |
| 5 |
Somewhat support |
347 |
18.8% |
0.18777056 |
| 6 |
Support |
644 |
34.8% |
0.34848485 |
| 7 |
Strongly support |
170 |
9.2% |
0.09199134 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.0% |
0.01028139 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6257 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_open
|
Variable label:
|
Comment [R15KMHC]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
You can comment here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ] [Text data
will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can
be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen
Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15kmhc_c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Have you during the last 12 months: Hunting.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the
activities below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hunting
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hunting |
133 |
7.2% |
0.071969697 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6257 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1701 |
92.0% |
0.920454545 |
r15kmhc_c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Have you during the last 12 months: Fishing.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the
activities below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fishing
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Fishing |
560 |
30.3% |
0.303030303 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6257 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1274 |
68.9% |
0.689393939 |
r15kmhc_c_3
|
Variable label:
|
Have you during the last 12 months: Hiked in the forest.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the
activities below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hiking in the forest
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hiking in the forest |
1626 |
88.0% |
0.879870130 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6257 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
208 |
11.3% |
0.112554113 |
r15kmhc_c_4
|
Variable label:
|
Have you during the last 12 months: Hiked in the mountain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the
activities below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hiking in the mountains
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hiking in the mountains |
1188 |
64.3% |
0.642857143 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6257 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
646 |
35.0% |
0.349567100 |
r15kmhc_c_5
|
Variable label:
|
Have you during the last 12 months: Boat trip (leisure boat).
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the
activities below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Boat trip (leisure boat)
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Boat trip (leisure boat) |
822 |
44.5% |
0.444805195 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6257 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1012 |
54.8% |
0.547619048 |
r15byrakrat_conjoint_ran0a
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects measure in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects measure in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
increased privatisation of the municipality’s care and nursing services |
1445 |
51.4% |
0.5136865 |
| 2 |
increased use of tolls |
1368 |
48.6% |
0.4863135 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint_ran0b
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects subject in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects subject in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
care and nursing services |
1445 |
51.4% |
0.5136865 |
| 2 |
transportation |
1368 |
48.6% |
0.4863135 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint_ran0c
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects question in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects question in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Which of these municipal employees do you think is best suited to lead the
expert group? |
1398 |
49.7% |
0.4969783 |
| 2 |
If the group had been led by one of them, which recommendation would you trust
the most? |
1415 |
50.3% |
0.5030217 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint_ran0c2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Specifies the
response options based on the value in r15byrakrat_conjoint_ran0c for
person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Specifies the
response options based on the value in r15byrakrat_conjoint_ran0c for
person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Municipal employee |
1398 |
49.7% |
0.4969783 |
| 2 |
The recommendation from the group led by municipal employee |
1415 |
50.3% |
0.5030217 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran11
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects education for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects education for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has higher education |
1453 |
51.7% |
0.5165304 |
| 2 |
Does not have higher education |
1360 |
48.3% |
0.4834696 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran12
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects gender for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects gender for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1397 |
49.7% |
0.4966228 |
| 2 |
Female |
1416 |
50.3% |
0.5033772 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran13
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects age for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects age for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
35 years old |
669 |
23.8% |
0.2378244 |
| 2 |
45 years old |
711 |
25.3% |
0.2527551 |
| 3 |
55 years old |
731 |
26.0% |
0.2598649 |
| 4 |
65 years old |
702 |
25.0% |
0.2495556 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran14
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects professional experience for person 1 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects professional experience for person 1 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
has only worked in the public sector |
661 |
23.5% |
0.2349804 |
| 2 |
has mainly worked in the public sector |
731 |
26.0% |
0.2598649 |
| 3 |
has mainly worked in the private sector |
714 |
25.4% |
0.2538215 |
| 4 |
has only worked in the private sector |
707 |
25.1% |
0.2513331 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran15
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects occupational position for person 1 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects occupational position for person 1 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Is a top manager in the municipality |
924 |
32.8% |
0.3284749 |
| 2 |
Is a mid-level manager for the municipality |
900 |
32.0% |
0.3199431 |
| 3 |
Does not have managerial responsibilities |
989 |
35.2% |
0.3515819 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran16
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects political engagement for person 1 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects political involvement for person 1 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
has previously been active in the mayor's political party |
577 |
20.5% |
0.2051191 |
| 2 |
is active in the mayor's political party |
518 |
18.4% |
0.1841450 |
| 3 |
has previously been active in a political party other than the mayor's party |
572 |
20.3% |
0.2033416 |
| 4 |
is active in a political party other than the mayor's party |
576 |
20.5% |
0.2047636 |
| 5 |
has never been active in a political party |
570 |
20.3% |
0.2026306 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran17
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects area of expertise for person 1 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects area of expertise for person 1 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
has mostly worked with [care and nursing services / transport] |
940 |
33.4% |
0.3341628 |
| 2 |
has worked on various tasks in his/her previous career |
900 |
32.0% |
0.3199431 |
| 3 |
has mostly worked on school and education |
973 |
34.6% |
0.3458941 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran21
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects education for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects education for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has higher education |
1332 |
47.4% |
0.4735158 |
| 2 |
Does not have higher education |
1481 |
52.6% |
0.5264842 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran22
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects gender for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects gender for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1392 |
49.5% |
0.4948454 |
| 2 |
Female |
1421 |
50.5% |
0.5051546 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran23
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects age for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects age for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
35 years old |
670 |
23.8% |
0.2381799 |
| 2 |
45 years old |
692 |
24.6% |
0.2460007 |
| 3 |
55 years old |
727 |
25.8% |
0.2584429 |
| 4 |
65 years old |
724 |
25.7% |
0.2573765 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran24
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects professional experience for person 2 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects professional experience for person 2 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
has only worked in the public sector |
701 |
24.9% |
0.2492001 |
| 2 |
has mainly worked in the public sector |
694 |
24.7% |
0.2467117 |
| 3 |
has mainly worked in the private sector |
707 |
25.1% |
0.2513331 |
| 4 |
has only worked in the private sector |
711 |
25.3% |
0.2527551 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran25
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects occupational position for person 2 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects occupational position for person 2 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Is a top manager in the municipality |
966 |
34.3% |
0.3434056 |
| 2 |
Is a mid-level manager for the municipality |
952 |
33.8% |
0.3384287 |
| 3 |
Does not have managerial responsibilities |
895 |
31.8% |
0.3181657 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran26
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects political engagement for person 2 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects political involvementfor person 2 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
has previously been active in the mayor's political party |
570 |
20.3% |
0.2026306 |
| 2 |
is active in the mayor's political party |
592 |
21.0% |
0.2104515 |
| 3 |
has previously been active in a political party other than the mayor's party |
569 |
20.2% |
0.2022752 |
| 4 |
is active in a political party other than the mayor's party |
533 |
18.9% |
0.1894774 |
| 5 |
has never been active in a political party |
549 |
19.5% |
0.1951653 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran27
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects area of expertise for person 2 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly
selects area of expertise for person 2 in
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
has mostly worked with [care and nursing services / transport] |
981 |
34.9% |
0.348738 |
| 2 |
has worked on various tasks in his/her previous career |
918 |
32.6% |
0.326342 |
| 3 |
has mostly worked on school and education |
914 |
32.5% |
0.324920 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons
|
Variable label:
|
Bureaucrat recruitment, conjoint-experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that your municipality is considering [increased
privatisation of the municipality’s care and nursing services /
increased use of tolls]. An expert group shall provide a professionally
based recommendation about what the municipality should do. The local
newspaper reports that the choice of chairperson for the expert group is
between two municipal employees. Please read the description of both of
these municipal employees carefully and consider the question below.
[Table with characteristics of two different persons: Education, gender,
age, professional experience, occupational position, political
involvement, area of expertise]
|
|
Literal question:
|
[Which of these municipal employees do you think is best suited to lead
the expert group? / If the group had been led by one of them, which
recommendation would you trust the most?]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question
about forest is not answered (kmhc). Conjoint-Experiment. Respondents
are exposed to two people with varying characteristics. The
characteristics of the persons and the question asked the respondent are
chosen at random. See background variables.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Municipal employee 1 / The recommendation from the group led by municipal
employee 1] |
1336 |
47.0% |
0.47009148 |
| 2 |
[Municipal employee 2 / The recommendation from the group led by municipal
employee 2] |
1379 |
48.5% |
0.48522167 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
127 |
4.5% |
0.04468684 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5263 |
|
NA |
r15polkom7_overskrift1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for
r15polkom7_1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for
r15polkom7_1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2500] [Invalid:5605]
[Range:7-1440]
|
r15polkom7_overskrift2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for
r15polkom7_2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for
r15polkom7_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2500] [Invalid:5605]
[Range:9-1440]
|
r15polkom7_overskrift3
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for
r15polkom7_3.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for
r15polkom7_3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2500] [Invalid:5605]
[Range:7-1440]
|
r15polkom7_overskrift4
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for
r15polkom7_4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for
r15polkom7_4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2500] [Invalid:5605]
[Range:7-1439]
|
r15polkom7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM7_OVERSKRIFT1].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Our aim is to study people’s routines pertaining to the media. Below are
some headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian online
newspapers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer
to read?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1
or 3). Displays randomly selected headlines as specified by
r15polkom7_overskrift1. In total, the respondent is shown 4 randomly
selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[The value of r15polkom7_overskrift1] |
1169 |
46.3% |
0.46260388 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.2% |
0.01187178 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5578 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1328 |
52.6% |
0.52552434 |
r15polkom7_2
|
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM7_OVERSKRIFT2].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Our aim is to study people’s routines pertaining to the media. Below are
some headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian online
newspapers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer
to read?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1
or 3). Displays randomly selected headlines as specified by
r15polkom7_overskrift2. In total, the respondent is shown 4 randomly
selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[The value of r15polkom7_overskrift2] |
1155 |
45.7% |
0.45706371 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.2% |
0.01187178 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5578 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1342 |
53.1% |
0.53106450 |
r15polkom7_3
|
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM7_OVERSKRIFT3].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Our aim is to study people’s routines pertaining to the media. Below are
some headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian online
newspapers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer
to read?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1
or 3). Displays randomly selected headlines as specified by
r15polkom7_overskrift3. In total, the respondent is shown 4 randomly
selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[The value of r15polkom7_overskrift3] |
1115 |
44.1% |
0.44123467 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.2% |
0.01187178 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5578 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1382 |
54.7% |
0.54689355 |
r15polkom7_4
|
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM2_OVERSKRIFT4].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Our aim is to study people’s routines pertaining to the media. Below are
some headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian online
newspapers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer
to read?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1
or 3). Displays randomly selected headlines as specified by
r15polkom7_overskrift4. In total, the respondent is shown 4 randomly
selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[The value of r15polkom7_overskrift4] |
1140 |
45.1% |
0.45112782 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.2% |
0.01187178 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5578 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1357 |
53.7% |
0.53700040 |
r15polkom7_ignored
|
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to
proceed without giving a response to r15polkom7. If yes, the respondent
received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure
you do not want to choose news items, press ‘next’ if you still do not
want to answer the question.” (translated)]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to
proceed without giving a response to r15polkom7. If yes, the respondent
received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure
you do not want to choose news items, press ‘next’ if you still do not
want to answer the question.” (translated)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:85] [Invalid:8020]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent clicked "Next" without answering, was prompted to respond |
85 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8020 |
|
NA |
r15polkom72_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3) Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent is to
receive r15polkom72. The selection is random, but with 33% probability
of getting r15polkom72.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3) Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent is to
receive r15polkom72. The selection is random, but with 33% probability
of getting r15polkom72.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2497] [Invalid:5608]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent gets r15polkom72 |
803 |
32.2% |
0.3215859 |
| 2 |
Respondenten does not get r15polkom72 |
1694 |
67.8% |
0.6784141 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5608 |
|
NA |
r15polkom72_overskrift1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly
selects headline for r15polkom72_1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly
selects headline for r15polkom72_1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:803] [Invalid:7302]
[Range:11-1437]
|
r15polkom72_overskrift2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly
selects headline for r15polkom72_2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly
selects headline for r15polkom72_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:803] [Invalid:7302]
[Range:9-1438]
|
r15polkom72_overskrift3
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly
selects headline for r15polkom72_3.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly
selects headline for r15polkom72_3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:803] [Invalid:7302]
[Range:9-1437]
|
r15polkom72_overskrift4
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly
selects headline for r15polkom72_4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert
= 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly
selects headline for r15polkom72_4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:803] [Invalid:7302]
[Range:7-1439]
|
r15polkom72_1
|
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM72_OVERSKRIFT1].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are some more headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian
online newspapers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer
to read?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1
or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1. Displays randomly selected headlines
as specified by r15polkom72_overskrift1. In total, the respondent is
shown 4 randomly selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[The value of r15polkom72_overskrift1] |
388 |
48.3% |
0.483188 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7302 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
415 |
51.7% |
0.516812 |
r15polkom72_2
|
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM72_OVERSKRIFT2].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are some more headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian
online newspapers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer
to read?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1
or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1. Displays randomly selected headlines
as specified by r15polkom72_overskrift2. In total, the respondent is
shown 4 randomly selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[The value of r15polkom72_overskrift2] |
350 |
43.6% |
0.4358655 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7302 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
453 |
56.4% |
0.5641345 |
r15polkom72_3
|
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM72_OVERSKRIFT3].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are some more headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian
online newspapers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer
to read?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1
or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1. Displays randomly selected headlines
as specified by r15polkom72_overskrift3. In total, the respondent is
shown 4 randomly selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[The value of r15polkom72_overskrift3] |
380 |
47.3% |
0.4732254 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7302 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
423 |
52.7% |
0.5267746 |
r15polkom72_4
|
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM72_OVERSKRIFT4].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are some more headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian
online newspapers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer
to read?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1
or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1. Displays randomly selected headlines
as specified by r15polkom72_overskrift4. In total, the respondent is
shown 4 randomly selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[The value of r15polkom72_overskrift4] |
367 |
45.7% |
0.4570361 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7302 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
436 |
54.3% |
0.5429639 |
r15polkom72_ignored
|
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to
proceed without giving a response to r15polkom72. If yes, the respondent
received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure
you do not want to choose news items, press ‘next’ if you still do not
want to answer the question.” (translated)]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to
proceed without giving a response to r15polkom72. If yes, the respondent
received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure
you do not want to choose news items, press ‘next’ if you still do not
want to answer the question.” (translated)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:41] [Invalid:8064]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent clicked "Next" without answering, was prompted to respond |
41 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8064 |
|
NA |
r15arbeidolje1
|
Variable label:
|
Work(ed) in or near the oil- and gas industry.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely
associated with it?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15rekruttert = 14 and r14bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9.
Respondents who are not unemployed or retired did not receive an
alternative 3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I [work/worked] in the oil or gas industry |
50 |
4.1% |
0.04132231 |
| 2 |
Yes, my job [is/was] closely associated with the oil or gas industry |
38 |
3.1% |
0.03140496 |
| 3 |
No, but previously I have worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely
associated with it |
48 |
4.0% |
0.03966942 |
| 4 |
No |
1044 |
86.3% |
0.86280992 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02479339 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6895 |
|
NA |
r15_arbeidolje2
|
Variable label:
|
Started first job in or near oil- and gas industry when.
|
|
Literal question:
|
When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry (or your
first job closely associated with the oil and gas industry)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15rekruttert = 14 and (r14bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9)
and (r15arbeidolje1 = 1 | 2 | 3) ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Before 1980 |
14 |
10.3% |
0.102941176 |
| 2 |
1980-89 |
40 |
29.4% |
0.294117647 |
| 3 |
1990-99 |
31 |
22.8% |
0.227941176 |
| 4 |
2000-2009 |
30 |
22.1% |
0.220588235 |
| 5 |
After 2009 |
20 |
14.7% |
0.147058824 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.7% |
0.007352941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7969 |
|
NA |
r15arbeidolje_2b
|
Variable label:
|
Comment [R15_ARBEIDOLJE2]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have additional comments, please write them here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15rekruttert = 14 and (r14bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9)
and (r15arbeidolje1 = 1 | 2 ) ] [Text data will not be distributed due
to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r15bfi10_1
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Reserved.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is reserved
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
1423 |
17.6% |
0.17557064 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1909 |
23.6% |
0.23553362 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1349 |
16.6% |
0.16644047 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
2704 |
33.4% |
0.33362122 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
469 |
5.8% |
0.05786552 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
251 |
3.1% |
0.03096854 |
r15bfi10_2
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Generally trusting.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is generally trusting
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
173 |
2.1% |
0.02134485 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
671 |
8.3% |
0.08278840 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
942 |
11.6% |
0.11622455 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
3786 |
46.7% |
0.46711906 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
2324 |
28.7% |
0.28673658 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
209 |
2.6% |
0.02578655 |
r15bfi10_3
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Tendency to be lazy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… tend to be lazy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
2693 |
33.2% |
0.33226403 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
2188 |
27.0% |
0.26995682 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1316 |
16.2% |
0.16236891 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1455 |
18.0% |
0.17951882 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
233 |
2.9% |
0.02874769 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
220 |
2.7% |
0.02714374 |
r15bfi10_4
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Relaxed, handles stress well.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is relaxed, handles stress well
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
349 |
4.3% |
0.04305984 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1521 |
18.8% |
0.18766194 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1308 |
16.1% |
0.16138186 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
3228 |
39.8% |
0.39827267 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
1487 |
18.3% |
0.18346700 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
212 |
2.6% |
0.02615669 |
r15bfi10_5
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Few artistic interests.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… has few artistic interests
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
2285 |
28.2% |
0.28192474 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
2491 |
30.7% |
0.30734115 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1265 |
15.6% |
0.15607650 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
1415 |
17.5% |
0.17458359 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
429 |
5.3% |
0.05293029 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
220 |
2.7% |
0.02714374 |
r15bfi10_6
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Outgoing, sociable.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is outgoing, sociable
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
332 |
4.1% |
0.04096237 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1210 |
14.9% |
0.14929056 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1260 |
15.5% |
0.15545959 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
3014 |
37.2% |
0.37186922 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
2092 |
25.8% |
0.25811228 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
197 |
2.4% |
0.02430598 |
r15bfi10_7
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Tends to find fault with others.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… tends to find fault with others
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
1310 |
16.2% |
0.16162862 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
2324 |
28.7% |
0.28673658 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
2254 |
27.8% |
0.27809994 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
1807 |
22.3% |
0.22294880 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
203 |
2.5% |
0.02504627 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
207 |
2.6% |
0.02553979 |
r15bfi10_8
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Does a thorough job.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… do a thorough job
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
116 |
1.4% |
0.01431215 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
185 |
2.3% |
0.02282542 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
739 |
9.1% |
0.09117829 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
3305 |
40.8% |
0.40777298 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
3560 |
43.9% |
0.43923504 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
200 |
2.5% |
0.02467613 |
r15bfi10_9
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Easily nervous.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… get nervous easily
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
2312 |
28.5% |
0.28525601 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
2321 |
28.6% |
0.28636644 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1444 |
17.8% |
0.17816163 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
1476 |
18.2% |
0.18210981 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
334 |
4.1% |
0.04120913 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
218 |
2.7% |
0.02689698 |
r15bfi10_10
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Active imagination.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… has an active imagination
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
487 |
6.0% |
0.06008637 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1134 |
14.0% |
0.13991363 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
2037 |
25.1% |
0.25132634 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
2707 |
33.4% |
0.33399136 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
1541 |
19.0% |
0.19012955 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
199 |
2.5% |
0.02455275 |
r15econklimaeksperiment_1a
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, hidden partner.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You and another person in this round of the Norwegian Citizen Panel
will be randomly selected and paired. You will receive two thousand
kroner in a joint account. You and the other person can transfer up to
one thousand kroner each from the joint account to each of your personal
accounts.
For every one hundred kroner that is not transferred, we will add fifty
kroner to the joint account. Half the amount in the joint account, as
well as the money in your personal account, will constitute your final
payout. You and the other person will receive half of the amount in the
joint account regardless of what you both decide to do. We will now ask
you to make two independent decisions. In the first decision, you don’t
know how much the other person transfers to his or her personal account.
In the second decision, you must choose how much you want to transfer to
your private account given the other person’s choice. Which of the two
decisions that will apply regarding the final payout will be randomly
selected.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private
account? (0-1000)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:844] [Invalid:7261]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1a_ignor
|
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to
proceed without giving a response to r15econklimaeksperiment_1a. If yes,
the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer:
“Are you sure you do not want to answer the question? It is useful for
the researchers if the question is answered in full. If you are sure you
may skip ahead.” (translated)]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to
proceed without giving a response to r15econklimaeksperiment_1a. If yes,
the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer:
“Are you sure you do not want to answer the question? It is useful for
the researchers if the question is answered in full. If you are sure you
may skip ahead.” (translated)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:92] [Invalid:8013]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent clicked "Next" without answering, was prompted to respond |
92 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8013 |
|
NA |
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK 0
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private
account given that the other person:
|
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 0 kroner from the joint account
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:612] [Invalid:7493]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK
100
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private
account given that the other person:
|
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 100 kroner from the joint account
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:545] [Invalid:7560]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK
200
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private
account given that the other person:
|
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 200 kroner from the joint account
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:531] [Invalid:7574]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK
300
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private
account given that the other person:
|
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 300 kroner from the joint account
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:527] [Invalid:7578]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_5
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK
400
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private
account given that the other person:
|
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 400 kroner from the joint account
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:527] [Invalid:7578]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_6
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK
500
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private
account given that the other person:
|
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 500 kroner from the joint account
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:619] [Invalid:7486]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_7
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK
600
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private
account given that the other person:
|
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 600 kroner from the joint account
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:521] [Invalid:7584]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_8
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK
700
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private
account given that the other person:
|
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 700 kroner from the joint account
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:517] [Invalid:7588]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_9
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK
800
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private
account given that the other person:
|
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 800 kroner from the joint account
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:516] [Invalid:7589]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_10
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK
900
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private
account given that the other person:
|
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 900 kroner from the joint account
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:514] [Invalid:7591]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_11
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK
1000
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private
account given that the other person:
|
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 1000 kroner from the joint account
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:553] [Invalid:7552]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_ignor
|
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to
proceed without giving a response to r15econklimaeksperiment_1b. If yes,
the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer:
“Are you sure you do not want to answer the question? It is useful for
the researchers if the question is answered in full. If you are sure you
may skip ahead.” (translated)]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to
proceed without giving a response to r15econklimaeksperiment_1b. If yes,
the respondent was shown the following warning: “Are you sure you do not
want to answer the question? It is useful for the researchers if the
question is answered in full. If you are sure you may skip ahead.”
(translated)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:108] [Invalid:7997]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent clicked "Next" without answering, was prompted to respond |
108 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7997 |
|
NA |
r15econklimaeksperiment_2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. Background variable.
Randomly selects text element for r15econklimaeksperiment_2_1 and
r15econklimaeksperiment_2_2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. Background variable.
Randomly selects text element for r15econklimaeksperiment_2_1 and
r15econklimaeksperiment_2_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:905] [Invalid:7200]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Blank] |
464 |
51.3% |
0.5127072 |
| 2 |
In 2015, 100,000 Norwegians collected in money, and Rainforest Foundation
Norway’s funds to preserve the rainforests increased by 183 million kroner. |
441 |
48.7% |
0.4872928 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7200 |
|
NA |
r15econklimaeksperiment_2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much to Rainforest Foundation.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You and another person in this round of the Norwegian Citizen Panel will
be randomly selected and paired. Each of you will receive one thousand
kroner that can be transferred to a joint account. For every one hundred
kroner that is transferred, we will add fifty kroner to the joint
account. Each person’s payout is the amount that the person does not
transfer. We will send the amount left in the joint account to
Rainforest Foundation Norway. The amount affects how much rainforest
will be preserved. [Blank / In 2015, 100,000 Norwegians collected in
money, and Rainforest Foundation Norway’s funds to preserve the
rainforests increased by 183 million kroner.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you like to contribute to Rainforest Foundation Norway?
(0-1000) (1)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. The wording of the question
depends on the randomized value of r15econklimaeksperiment_2_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:841] [Invalid:7264]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Thinks partner transfers how much to
Rainforest Foundation.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You and another person in this round of the Norwegian Citizen Panel will
be randomly selected and paired. Each of you will receive one thousand
kroner that can be transferred to a joint account. For every one hundred
kroner that is transferred, we will add fifty kroner to the joint
account. Each person’s payout is the amount that the person does not
transfer. We will send the amount left in the joint account to
Rainforest Foundation Norway. The amount affects how much rainforest
will be preserved. [Blank / In 2015, 100,000 Norwegians collected in
money, and Rainforest Foundation Norway’s funds to preserve the
rainforests increased by 183 million kroner.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you think the other person has contributed? (0-1000)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. The wording of the question
depends on the randomized value of r15econklimaeksperiment_2_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:828] [Invalid:7277]
[Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_2_ignore
|
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to
proceed without giving a response to 15econklimaeksperiment_2. If yes,
the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer:
“Are you sure you do not want to answer the question? It is useful for
the researchers if the question is answered in full. If you are sure you
may skip ahead.” (translated)]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to
proceed without giving a response to 15econklimaeksperiment_2. If yes,
the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer:
“Are you sure you do not want to answer the question? It is useful for
the researchers if the question is answered in full. If you are sure you
may skip ahead.” (translated)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:80] [Invalid:8025]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent clicked "Next" without answering, was prompted to respond |
80 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8025 |
|
NA |
r15econklimaeksperiment_rekkef
|
Variable label:
|
[ Specifies the order of r15econklimaeksperiment_1 and
r15econklimaeksperiment_2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Specifies the order of r15econklimaeksperiment_1 and
r15econklimaeksperiment_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:908] [Invalid:7197]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
r15econklimaeksperiment_1 was shown first |
494 |
54.4% |
0.5440529 |
| 2 |
r15econklimaeksperiment_2 was shown first |
414 |
45.6% |
0.4559471 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7197 |
|
NA |
r15P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
4025 |
49.7% |
0.496607 |
| 2 |
Female |
4080 |
50.3% |
0.503393 |
r15P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
2316 |
28.6% |
0.28574954 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
1863 |
23.0% |
0.22985811 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
404 |
5.0% |
0.04984577 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
2204 |
27.2% |
0.27193091 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
685 |
8.5% |
0.08451573 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
633 |
7.8% |
0.07809994 |
r15P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-18]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus |
1053 |
13.0% |
0.12991980 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
1263 |
15.6% |
0.15582973 |
| 3 |
Østfold |
407 |
5.0% |
0.05021592 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
366 |
4.5% |
0.04515731 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
226 |
2.8% |
0.02788402 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
237 |
2.9% |
0.02924121 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
397 |
4.9% |
0.04898211 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
230 |
2.8% |
0.02837754 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
255 |
3.1% |
0.03146206 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
149 |
1.8% |
0.01838371 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
744 |
9.2% |
0.09179519 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
985 |
12.2% |
0.12152992 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
140 |
1.7% |
0.01727329 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
335 |
4.1% |
0.04133251 |
| 15 |
Trøndelag |
685 |
8.5% |
0.08451573 |
| 16 |
Nordland |
311 |
3.8% |
0.03837138 |
| 17 |
Troms |
240 |
3.0% |
0.02961135 |
| 18 |
Finmark |
82 |
1.0% |
0.01011721 |
r15P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
544 |
6.7% |
0.06711906 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
2297 |
28.3% |
0.28340531 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
4935 |
60.9% |
0.60888341 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
329 |
4.1% |
0.04059223 |
r15P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
23 |
0.3% |
0.002837754 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
521 |
6.4% |
0.064281308 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
888 |
11.0% |
0.109561999 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
943 |
11.6% |
0.116347933 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
466 |
5.7% |
0.057495373 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
734 |
9.1% |
0.090561382 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
1694 |
20.9% |
0.209006786 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
603 |
7.4% |
0.074398519 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
552 |
6.8% |
0.068106107 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1174 |
14.5% |
0.144848859 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
178 |
2.2% |
0.021961752 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
218 |
2.7% |
0.026896977 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
111 |
1.4% |
0.013695250 |
r15P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
226 |
2.8% |
0.02788402 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
1446 |
17.8% |
0.17840839 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
1971 |
24.3% |
0.24318322 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
1716 |
21.2% |
0.21172116 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
1236 |
15.2% |
0.15249846 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
875 |
10.8% |
0.10795805 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
635 |
7.8% |
0.07834670 |
r15P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
3643 |
44.9% |
0.4494756 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
3827 |
47.2% |
0.4721777 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
635 |
7.8% |
0.0783467 |
r15Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]
|
r15Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-19]
|
r15Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]
|
