Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Lund Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Dag Elgesem
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
|
Arjan Hille Schakel
|
UiB
|
|
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø
|
NORCE
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
|
Soran Hajo Dahl
|
UiB
|
|
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
|
UiB
|
Coordinating team
|
Name
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
|
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
|
|
Soran Hajo Dahl
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Universe: Norwegian Citizens above
the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in eight
waves:
In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 1).
In wave 3, 5 623 members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 3).
In wave 8, 4 245 new
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8).
In wave
11, 2 069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave
11).
In wave 14, 2 036 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 14).
In wave 16, 5 163 panel members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 16).
In wave 18, 2 048
panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 18). In wave
22, 3 221 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 22).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry, while in wave 8 the
gross sample amounted to 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, 14, and 18, a
corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. In wave 16, the
gross sample was 34 000. In wave 22 the gross sample was 23 000.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d)
gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment.
Recruitment of new members to the panel was completed in several steps.
First, an invitation letter was sent to everyone in the sample. The
invitation letter contained the following information: a) description of
the project; b) current privacy and procedural privacy guidelines; c)
timeframe for the project; d) participants right to opt out of the
panel; e) contact information to the project mangers; f) a unique login
code and URL for the Norwegian Citizens’ Panel’s website; g) estimated
time to complete the survey (15 minutes).
To maximize the recruitment rate, an incentive has been used in the form
of three travel gift cards. The value of the travel gift cards is 8,000
NOK. To participate in the drawing of the gift card, it is required that
the e-mail address is provided. Information about the lottery is
included in all correspondence with the respondents, with the exception
of the final reminder via text message.
The invitation letter was posted on November 1st, 2021. A reminder was
sent to those respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b)
had not completed the survey. New respondents received only one
reminder, either via a postcard or a text message. The text message was
sent to respondents under the age of 60. The postcard was sent to
respondents over the age of 60 and to those without a registered mobile
number. Respondents were invited to participate in the Norwegian
Citizens’ Panel with reference to the invitation letter. The postcard
was posted on November 15th, 2021. The login code was also given in the
postcard. The text message was sent out on November 17th, 2021. The text
message contained both a login code and a direct link to the survey.
Data collection among old panel members was done in parallel with the
recruitment of new respondents. The invitation email was sent out to a
small portion of panel members on November 2nd, 2021 (soft launch),
followed by the main dispatch November 3rd, 2021. The first, second, and
third reminders were sent to the respondents’ email, on 8th, 12th, 17th
of November, 2021, respectively. Panel members with a registered mobile
number received the last reminder in form of a text message.
Wave 22 ended November 30th, 2021.
Weighting
To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated.
The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population
and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata
in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns
values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will
receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a
weight below 1. The weights of the different strata are listed in the
documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information
regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are
based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample
file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information
regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when
answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weights are calculated
using the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized)
sub-groups, which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group
compared to the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, variable
columns are included in the dataset that indicates the proportion size
of strata in the population.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 22
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-27
|
r22Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r22Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-27
|
r22Weight3
|
New
variable: Added r22Weight3
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-27
|
r22Weight3
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-27
|
r22Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-102
|
2023-09-27
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 22
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-30
|
r22bk26_kodet
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22k3_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r22k3 that also includes coded other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22valg4_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r22valg4 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22bk26_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r22bk26 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22bk33_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r22bk33 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22bk21_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r22bk21 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22bk27_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r22bk27 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22k3_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22valg4_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22bk26_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22bk33_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22bk21_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22bk27_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-101
|
2022-05-04
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 22
|
|
NA
|
2022-02-14
|
r22oppvekstfylke
|
New
variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years
of age, based on registered municipality in r22oppvekstkom
|
|
NA
|
2022-02-14
|
r22oppvekstfylke
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2022-02-10
|
r22pk10
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2022-02-10
|
r22tdr17
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-100
|
2021-12-14
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 22
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 22 - v-102-L.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Privileged
|
|
# Cases
|
13697
|
|
# Variables
|
492
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r22rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-22]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Round 1 |
1570 |
11.5% |
0.11462364 |
| 3 |
Round 3 |
1712 |
12.5% |
0.12499087 |
| 8 |
Round 8 |
1614 |
11.8% |
0.11783602 |
| 11 |
Round 11 |
917 |
6.7% |
0.06694897 |
| 14 |
Round 14 |
962 |
7.0% |
0.07023436 |
| 16 |
Round 16 |
2619 |
19.1% |
0.19120975 |
| 18 |
Round 18 |
1082 |
7.9% |
0.07899540 |
| 22 |
Round 22 |
3221 |
23.5% |
0.23516098 |
r22group
|
Variable label:
|
[Subgroup in wave 22. Assigned based on background information and
randomization]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Respondents where r22rekruttert != 22, r20group != 6, r19group != 3,
r16group = 6|7 & r18group != 5 were devided into four “residual
groups” (“restutvalg”). The groups were drawn with weighted
randomization - 30% likelihood of being assigned to restutvalg1-3, 10%
for restutvalg4. 20% of those initially designated for restutvalg3 were
placed in r22group = 6:
restutvalg1: Assigned r22group = 4.
restutvalg2: Receives r22padkom_demopop1, r22padkom_demopop2.
restutvalg3: Receives r22polkomrep2, r22polkomrep3, r22oc5,
r22oc6.
restutvalg4: Receives r22oc2 - r22oc4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 (randomized) |
2001 |
14.6% |
0.14609038 |
| 2 |
Group 2 (randomized) |
1954 |
14.3% |
0.14265898 |
| 3 |
Group 3 (randomized) |
1965 |
14.3% |
0.14346207 |
| 4 |
Group 4 ("restutvalg1" (residual selection 1)) |
1483 |
10.8% |
0.10827188 |
| 5 |
Group 5 (randomized) |
1923 |
14.0% |
0.14039571 |
| 6 |
Group 6 (r18group = 5 + gross sample of 20% from restutvalg3) |
1150 |
8.4% |
0.08395999 |
| 7 |
Group 7 (newly recruited) |
3221 |
23.5% |
0.23516098 |
r22interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r22interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12800] [Invalid:897]
[Range:-]
|
r22browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r22browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r22mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
7516 |
54.9% |
0.5487333 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
6181 |
45.1% |
0.4512667 |
r22opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r22enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
7516 |
54.9% |
0.548733299 |
| 2 |
Touch |
6113 |
44.6% |
0.446302110 |
| 3 |
Generic |
68 |
0.5% |
0.004964591 |
r22advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r22getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r22k3
|
Variable label:
|
Which party did you vote for in the parliamentary elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for in the parliamentary elections?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
476 |
3.5% |
0.03475214 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2553 |
18.6% |
0.18639118 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
958 |
7.0% |
0.06994232 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
637 |
4.7% |
0.04650653 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1367 |
10.0% |
0.09980288 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1464 |
10.7% |
0.10688472 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
694 |
5.1% |
0.05066803 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
3149 |
23.0% |
0.22990436 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
847 |
6.2% |
0.06183836 |
| 10 |
Other: |
387 |
2.8% |
0.02825436 |
| 11 |
Did not vote |
476 |
3.5% |
0.03475214 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
552 |
4.0% |
0.04030080 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
84 |
0.6% |
0.00613273 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
53 |
0.4% |
0.00386946 |
r22k3_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which party did you vote for in the parliamentary elections? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for in the parliamentary elections?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
476 |
3.5% |
0.034752136 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2553 |
18.6% |
0.186391181 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
958 |
7.0% |
0.069942323 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
637 |
4.7% |
0.046506534 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1367 |
10.0% |
0.099802877 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1464 |
10.7% |
0.106884719 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
694 |
5.1% |
0.050668029 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
3149 |
23.0% |
0.229904359 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
847 |
6.2% |
0.061838359 |
| 10 |
Other: |
370 |
2.7% |
0.027013215 |
| 11 |
Did not vote |
479 |
3.5% |
0.034971162 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
556 |
4.1% |
0.040592831 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
84 |
0.6% |
0.006132730 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
0.5% |
0.004599547 |
r22k3_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which party did you vote for in the parliamentary elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22tdr_stemme_grunn
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What is the reason you voted as you did in the parliamentary
election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the reason you voted as you did in the parliamentary election?
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can write as much or as little as you want, preferably a few
sentences, or just a few words if you prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13 & r19group = 3]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22valg1_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election: Environment and climate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Environment and climate
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
3686 |
29.2% |
0.29216867 |
| 2 |
Important |
4909 |
38.9% |
0.38910907 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
2334 |
18.5% |
0.18500317 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
1028 |
8.1% |
0.08148383 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
387 |
3.1% |
0.03067533 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
272 |
2.2% |
0.02155992 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1081 |
|
NA |
r22valg1_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election: Immigration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
1813 |
14.4% |
0.14370640 |
| 2 |
Important |
4134 |
32.8% |
0.32767914 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
3834 |
30.4% |
0.30389981 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
1754 |
13.9% |
0.13902980 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
669 |
5.3% |
0.05302790 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
412 |
3.3% |
0.03265694 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1081 |
|
NA |
r22valg1_3
|
Variable label:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election: Inequality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Inequality
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
3783 |
30.0% |
0.29985732 |
| 2 |
Important |
4540 |
36.0% |
0.35986049 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
2560 |
20.3% |
0.20291693 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
960 |
7.6% |
0.07609385 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
352 |
2.8% |
0.02790108 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
421 |
3.3% |
0.03337032 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1081 |
|
NA |
r22valg1_4
|
Variable label:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election: Schools and education
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Schools and education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
3372 |
26.7% |
0.26727964 |
| 2 |
Important |
5655 |
44.8% |
0.44824033 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
2194 |
17.4% |
0.17390615 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
758 |
6.0% |
0.06008244 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
269 |
2.1% |
0.02132213 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
368 |
2.9% |
0.02916931 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1081 |
|
NA |
r22valg1_5
|
Variable label:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election: Health
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
4801 |
38.1% |
0.38054851 |
| 2 |
Important |
5617 |
44.5% |
0.44522828 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
1460 |
11.6% |
0.11572606 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
367 |
2.9% |
0.02909004 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
138 |
1.1% |
0.01093849 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
233 |
1.8% |
0.01846861 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1081 |
|
NA |
r22valg1_6
|
Variable label:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election: Taxes and duties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taxes and duties
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
2578 |
20.4% |
0.20434369 |
| 2 |
Important |
5117 |
40.6% |
0.40559607 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
3089 |
24.5% |
0.24484781 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
1170 |
9.3% |
0.09273938 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
344 |
2.7% |
0.02726696 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
318 |
2.5% |
0.02520609 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1081 |
|
NA |
r22valg1_7
|
Variable label:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election: Communications
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Communications
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
2251 |
17.8% |
0.17842422 |
| 2 |
Important |
5514 |
43.7% |
0.43706405 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
3121 |
24.7% |
0.24738427 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
1070 |
8.5% |
0.08481294 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
265 |
2.1% |
0.02100507 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
395 |
3.1% |
0.03130945 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1081 |
|
NA |
r22valg1_8
|
Variable label:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election: Regional policies
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Regional policies
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
2479 |
19.6% |
0.19649651 |
| 2 |
Important |
4011 |
31.8% |
0.31792961 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
3310 |
26.2% |
0.26236525 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
1752 |
13.9% |
0.13887127 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
708 |
5.6% |
0.05611921 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
356 |
2.8% |
0.02821814 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1081 |
|
NA |
r22valg1_9
|
Variable label:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election: Municipal and county mergers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were for your vote in
the parliamentary election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Municipal and county mergers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13 & r22group = 6]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
86 |
8.0% |
0.08037383 |
| 2 |
Important |
173 |
16.2% |
0.16168224 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
250 |
23.4% |
0.23364486 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
252 |
23.6% |
0.23551402 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
274 |
25.6% |
0.25607477 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
3.3% |
0.03271028 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12627 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_stemme_motivasjon_1
|
Variable label:
|
Motivation to vote: I always vote for this party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have stated that you voted in the parliamentary election. There
can be many reasons for how we vote.
How important were the following reasons for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I always vote for this party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22group = 6 & r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
135 |
12.7% |
0.12723845 |
| 2 |
Important |
196 |
18.5% |
0.18473139 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
174 |
16.4% |
0.16399623 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
130 |
12.3% |
0.12252592 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
394 |
37.1% |
0.37134779 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
3.0% |
0.03016023 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_stemme_motivasjon_2
|
Variable label:
|
Motivation to vote: I used my vote to reward or punish the government
for their conduct and decisions over the past four years
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have stated that you voted in the parliamentary election. There
can be many reasons for how we vote.
How important were the following reasons for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I used my vote to reward or punish the government (Conservative Party,
Christian Democratic Party and the Liberal Party) for their conduct and
decisions over the past four years
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22group = 6 & r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
103 |
9.7% |
0.09707823 |
| 2 |
Important |
143 |
13.5% |
0.13477851 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
162 |
15.3% |
0.15268615 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
120 |
11.3% |
0.11310085 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
494 |
46.6% |
0.46559849 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
39 |
3.7% |
0.03675778 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_stemme_motivasjon_3
|
Variable label:
|
Motivation to vote: I used my vote to increase the chance of a new
coalition of parties forming a government
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have stated that you voted in the parliamentary election. There
can be many reasons for how we vote.
How important were the following reasons for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I used my vote to increase the chance of a new coalition of parties
forming a government
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22group = 6 & r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
287 |
27.0% |
0.27049953 |
| 2 |
Important |
278 |
26.2% |
0.26201697 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
127 |
12.0% |
0.11969840 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
96 |
9.0% |
0.09048068 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
240 |
22.6% |
0.22620170 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
3.1% |
0.03110273 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_stemme_motivasjon_4
|
Variable label:
|
Motivation to vote: I used my vote to ensure that the new Storting
(Parliament) and government represent the interests of people like me
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have stated that you voted in the parliamentary election. There
can be many reasons for how we vote.
How important were the following reasons for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I used my vote to ensure that the new Storting (Parliament) and
government represent the interests of people like me
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22group = 6 & r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
389 |
36.7% |
0.36663525 |
| 2 |
Important |
402 |
37.9% |
0.37888784 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
159 |
15.0% |
0.14985862 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
50 |
4.7% |
0.04712535 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
40 |
3.8% |
0.03770028 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
2.0% |
0.01979265 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_stemme_motivasjon_5
|
Variable label:
|
Motivation to vote: I used my vote to ensure that the new Storting
(Parliament) and government will take account of other areas than Oslo
for the next four years
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have stated that you voted in the parliamentary election. There
can be many reasons for how we vote.
How important were the following reasons for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I used my vote to ensure that the new Storting (Parliament) and
government will take account of other areas than Oslo for the next four
years
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22group = 6 & r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
263 |
24.8% |
0.2478794 |
| 2 |
Important |
285 |
26.9% |
0.2686145 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
183 |
17.2% |
0.1724788 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
128 |
12.1% |
0.1206409 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
173 |
16.3% |
0.1630537 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
2.7% |
0.0273327 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_stemme_motivasjon_6
|
Variable label:
|
Motivation to vote: I used my vote to ensure that the new Storting
(Parliament) and government will take account of the needs of rural and
sparsely populated areas for the next four years
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have stated that you voted in the parliamentary election. There
can be many reasons for how we vote.
How important were the following reasons for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I used my vote to ensure that the new Storting (Parliament) and
government will take account of the needs of rural and sparsely
populated areas for the next four years
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22group = 6 & r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
181 |
17.1% |
0.17059378 |
| 2 |
Important |
253 |
23.8% |
0.23845429 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
216 |
20.4% |
0.20358153 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
194 |
18.3% |
0.18284637 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
184 |
17.3% |
0.17342130 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
3.1% |
0.03110273 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r22valg2
|
Variable label:
|
When did you decide to vote for the party you voted for in this
election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
When did you decide to vote for the party you voted for in this
election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Long before the election campaign began |
7587 |
60.5% |
0.605410150 |
| 2 |
During the election campaign |
2883 |
23.0% |
0.230051069 |
| 3 |
Just before election day |
1614 |
12.9% |
0.128790297 |
| 4 |
On election day itself |
433 |
3.5% |
0.034551548 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.1% |
0.001196936 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1165 |
|
NA |
r22valg3
|
Variable label:
|
How easy or difficult did you find it to decide in this election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How easy or difficult did you find it to decide in this election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22k3 = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very easy |
4160 |
33.0% |
0.329740013 |
| 2 |
Fairly easy |
4011 |
31.8% |
0.317929613 |
| 3 |
Neither easy nor difficult |
1444 |
11.4% |
0.114457831 |
| 4 |
Fairly difficult |
2320 |
18.4% |
0.183893469 |
| 5 |
Very difficult |
631 |
5.0% |
0.050015853 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
0.4% |
0.003963221 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1081 |
|
NA |
r22valg4
|
Variable label:
|
Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in
2017?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in
2017?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-14]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
489 |
3.6% |
0.035701248 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
3385 |
24.7% |
0.247134409 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
1122 |
8.2% |
0.081915748 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
712 |
5.2% |
0.051982186 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1174 |
8.6% |
0.085712200 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
981 |
7.2% |
0.071621523 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
590 |
4.3% |
0.043075126 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2968 |
21.7% |
0.216689786 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
498 |
3.6% |
0.036358327 |
| 10 |
Other: |
119 |
0.9% |
0.008688034 |
| 11 |
Did not vote |
458 |
3.3% |
0.033437979 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
746 |
5.4% |
0.054464481 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
68 |
0.5% |
0.004964591 |
| 14 |
Don't remember |
337 |
2.5% |
0.024603928 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
0.4% |
0.003650434 |
r22valg4_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in
2017? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in
2017?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-14]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
489 |
3.6% |
0.035701248 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
3387 |
24.7% |
0.247280426 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
1123 |
8.2% |
0.081988757 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
712 |
5.2% |
0.051982186 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1174 |
8.6% |
0.085712200 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
981 |
7.2% |
0.071621523 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
590 |
4.3% |
0.043075126 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2968 |
21.7% |
0.216689786 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
498 |
3.6% |
0.036358327 |
| 10 |
Other: |
97 |
0.7% |
0.007081843 |
| 11 |
Did not vote |
458 |
3.3% |
0.033437979 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
759 |
5.5% |
0.055413594 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
68 |
0.5% |
0.004964591 |
| 14 |
Don't remember |
337 |
2.5% |
0.024603928 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
0.4% |
0.004088487 |
r22valg4_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary
elections in 2017?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 1 (oil) for party 1 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Keep looking for more oil |
1297 |
33.1% |
0.3306143 |
| 2 |
Stop looking for more oil |
1344 |
34.3% |
0.3425950 |
| 3 |
Draw up a reduction plan to phase out the petroleum sector |
1282 |
32.7% |
0.3267907 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 1 (oil) for party 2 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Keep looking for more oil |
1308 |
33.3% |
0.3334183 |
| 2 |
Stop looking for more oil |
1374 |
35.0% |
0.3502422 |
| 3 |
Draw up a reduction plan to phase out the petroleum sector |
1241 |
31.6% |
0.3163395 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 2 (abortion) for party 1 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Tighten up the right to elective abortion |
1360 |
34.7% |
0.3466735 |
| 2 |
Retain today’s current limit for elective abortion |
1241 |
31.6% |
0.3163395 |
| 3 |
Remove the abortion boards and extend the right to elective abortion |
1322 |
33.7% |
0.3369870 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 2 (abortion) for party 2 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Tighten up the right to elective abortion |
1306 |
33.3% |
0.3329085 |
| 2 |
Retain today’s current limit for elective abortion |
1308 |
33.3% |
0.3334183 |
| 3 |
Remove the abortion boards and extend the right to elective abortion |
1309 |
33.4% |
0.3336732 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 3 (tax) for party 1 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The wealthiest should pay more wealth tax than they do today |
957 |
24.4% |
0.2439460 |
| 2 |
The wealth tax should be roughly the same as it is now |
1031 |
26.3% |
0.2628091 |
| 3 |
Reduce the wealth tax and remove it for company ownership |
995 |
25.4% |
0.2536324 |
| 4 |
Remove the wealth tax |
940 |
24.0% |
0.2396125 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 3 (tax) for party 2 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The wealthiest should pay more wealth tax than they do today |
978 |
24.9% |
0.2492990 |
| 2 |
The wealth tax should be roughly the same as it is now |
967 |
24.6% |
0.2464950 |
| 3 |
Reduce the wealth tax and remove it for company ownership |
965 |
24.6% |
0.2459852 |
| 4 |
Remove the wealth tax |
1013 |
25.8% |
0.2582207 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 4 (health) for party 1 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Prevent the privatisation of health services |
1289 |
32.9% |
0.3285751 |
| 2 |
Public health services can be complemented and supplemented with private
provision |
1289 |
32.9% |
0.3285751 |
| 3 |
Increase the use of private health services commissioned by the public sector |
1345 |
34.3% |
0.3428499 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 4 (health) for party 2 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Prevent the privatisation of health services |
1317 |
33.6% |
0.3357125 |
| 2 |
Public health services can be complemented and supplemented with private
provision |
1302 |
33.2% |
0.3318889 |
| 3 |
Increase the use of private health services commissioned by the public sector |
1304 |
33.2% |
0.3323987 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 5 (immigration) for party 1 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Accept more quota refugees |
953 |
24.3% |
0.2429263 |
| 2 |
Limit the number of asylum seekers and prioritise accepting quota refugees |
1005 |
25.6% |
0.2561815 |
| 3 |
Help refugees in neighbouring areas instead of accepting more of them in Norway |
1001 |
25.5% |
0.2551619 |
| 4 |
Limit the number of quota refugees and discontinue the current asylum system |
964 |
24.6% |
0.2457303 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 5 (immigration) for party 2 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Accept more quota refugees |
988 |
25.2% |
0.2518481 |
| 2 |
Limit the number of asylum seekers and prioritise accepting quota refugees |
969 |
24.7% |
0.2470048 |
| 3 |
Help refugees in neighbouring areas instead of accepting more of them in Norway |
991 |
25.3% |
0.2526128 |
| 4 |
Limit the number of quota refugees and discontinue the current asylum system |
975 |
24.9% |
0.2485343 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 6 (counties) for party 1 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It must be possible to dissolve counties that have been merged, if they so wish |
1328 |
33.9% |
0.3385164 |
| 2 |
Continue the regional reform |
1266 |
32.3% |
0.3227122 |
| 3 |
Discontinue the county authorities |
1329 |
33.9% |
0.3387713 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 6 (counties) for party 2 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It must be possible to dissolve counties that have been merged, if they so wish |
1317 |
33.6% |
0.3357125 |
| 2 |
Continue the regional reform |
1303 |
33.2% |
0.3321438 |
| 3 |
Discontinue the county authorities |
1303 |
33.2% |
0.3321438 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 7 (cars) for party 1 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It should pay to buy an electric car, but more expensive electric cars must
benefit less |
1266 |
32.3% |
0.3227122 |
| 2 |
Have the same conditions for petrol and diesel cars as electric cars |
1319 |
33.6% |
0.3362223 |
| 3 |
It should pay to buy an electric car |
1338 |
34.1% |
0.3410655 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran7_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value 7 (cars) for party 2 in
R22MEME_prefcjointa.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It should pay to buy an electric car, but more expensive electric cars must
benefit less |
1323 |
33.7% |
0.3372419 |
| 2 |
Have the same conditions for petrol and diesel cars as electric cars |
1313 |
33.5% |
0.3346928 |
| 3 |
It should pay to buy an electric car |
1287 |
32.8% |
0.3280653 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9774 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjoint_order
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Specifies the order of the attributes displayed to the
respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Specifies the order of the attributes displayed to the
respondent]
[1 = Oil extraction, 2 = Self-determined abortion, 3 = Taxation, 4 =
Health care, 5 = Immigration, 6 = Regional reform, 7 = Electric cars]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:3923] [Invalid:9774]
[Range:-]
|
r22meme_prefcjointa
|
Variable label:
|
Vote for one of two hypothetical political parties in parliamentary
elections
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Parliamentary elections were recently held in Norway in which the
parties ran various different party programmes. Imagine that two parties
with the positions described below had run in this election. The
positions taken by these fictive parties may vary more than the
positions of the actual parties in the election campaign earlier this
autumn, but we still ask you to imagine that these fictive parties are
real. Please read the description of the two fictive parties carefully,
and consider the questions below.
The parties will:
[The respondent was shown two randomized party programs based on
r22meme_prefcjoint_ran1_1 to r22meme_prefcjoint_ran7_2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let us say that in the parliamentary elections earlier this autumn, you
had to vote for one of these two parties. Based on the above
information, which party do you think you would vote for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Party 1 |
1889 |
48.1% |
0.48139653 |
| 2 |
Party 2 |
1924 |
49.0% |
0.49031600 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
111 |
2.8% |
0.02828746 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9773 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjointb_1
|
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of voting for party 1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Even if you are perhaps not quite certain, can you indicate how likely
you might be to vote for these parties if they had actually run for
election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Party 1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 I am certain that I could never have voted for this party |
569 |
14.5% |
0.14500510 |
| 2 |
1 |
225 |
5.7% |
0.05733945 |
| 3 |
2 |
400 |
10.2% |
0.10193680 |
| 4 |
3 |
458 |
11.7% |
0.11671764 |
| 5 |
4 |
420 |
10.7% |
0.10703364 |
| 6 |
5 |
597 |
15.2% |
0.15214067 |
| 7 |
6 |
361 |
9.2% |
0.09199796 |
| 8 |
7 |
322 |
8.2% |
0.08205912 |
| 9 |
8 |
198 |
5.0% |
0.05045872 |
| 10 |
9 |
65 |
1.7% |
0.01656473 |
| 11 |
10 I am certain that I could have voted for this party |
112 |
2.9% |
0.02854230 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
197 |
5.0% |
0.05020387 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9773 |
|
NA |
r22meme_prefcjointb_2
|
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of voting for party 2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Even if you are perhaps not quite certain, can you indicate how likely
you might be to vote for these parties if they had actually run for
election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Party 2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 I am certain that I could never have voted for this party |
560 |
14.3% |
0.14271152 |
| 2 |
1 |
258 |
6.6% |
0.06574924 |
| 3 |
2 |
350 |
8.9% |
0.08919470 |
| 4 |
3 |
405 |
10.3% |
0.10321101 |
| 5 |
4 |
373 |
9.5% |
0.09505607 |
| 6 |
5 |
573 |
14.6% |
0.14602446 |
| 7 |
6 |
330 |
8.4% |
0.08409786 |
| 8 |
7 |
344 |
8.8% |
0.08766565 |
| 9 |
8 |
228 |
5.8% |
0.05810398 |
| 10 |
9 |
87 |
2.2% |
0.02217125 |
| 11 |
10 I am certain that I could have voted for this party |
141 |
3.6% |
0.03593272 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
275 |
7.0% |
0.07008155 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9773 |
|
NA |
r22memeklima_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for R22meklima.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1923] [Invalid:11774]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The applicant is 30 years old. He has studied agriculture and wants to come to
Norway to work as an agronomist. In the long term, he would like to settle here.
He is unable to get a job in his home country due to the increasingly difficult
economic situation there. |
494 |
25.7% |
0.2568903 |
| 2 |
The applicant is 30 years old. He has studied agriculture and wants to come to
Norway to work as an agronomist. In the long term, he would like to settle here.
His home country is becoming uninhabitable due to rising sea levels caused by
climate change. |
462 |
24.0% |
0.2402496 |
| 3 |
The applicant is 30 years old. He has worked in agriculture and wants to come to
Norway to work as a farm worker. In the long term, he would like to settle here.
He is unable to get a job in his home country due to the increasingly difficult
economic situation there. |
470 |
24.4% |
0.2444098 |
| 4 |
The applicant is 30 years old. He has worked in agriculture and wants to come to
Norway to work as a farm worker. In the long term, he would like to settle here.
His home country is becoming uninhabitable due to rising sea levels caused by
climate change. |
497 |
25.8% |
0.2584503 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11774 |
|
NA |
r22memeklima_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects image for R22meklima.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1923] [Invalid:11774]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Select portrait of a dark-skinned man. |
936 |
48.7% |
0.4867395 |
| 2 |
Select portrait of a white man. |
987 |
51.3% |
0.5132605 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11774 |
|
NA |
r22memeklima_a
|
Variable label:
|
To which extent do you believe that the application to settle in Norway
should be rejected or granted?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Text displayed prior to the experiment:]
Every year, people from all over the world apply to the Norwegian
immigration authorities for permission to come to Norway. Some of these
applications are granted and some are rejected. On the next page you
will see the profile of a hypothetical person who has applied to settle
in Norway. We ask you to consider whether you would have granted or
rejected the person’s application, if the decision had been up to
you.
We ask you to assess the application on a scale of 0-100 (0 indicates
that the application should definitely be rejected and 100 that the
application should definitely be granted). We also ask you to choose
between granting (being allowed to come to Norway) and rejecting (not
being allowed to come to Norway) the application.
[The respondent is shown a picture of a person and a description based
on r22memeklima_ran1 and r22memeklima_ran2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
On the scale below, indicate the extent to which you believe that the
application should be rejected or granted:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Scroll to the required value
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 5]
[Dis played on the same page as: r22memeklima_b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1621] [Invalid:12076]
[Range:0-100]
|
r22memeklima_b
|
Variable label:
|
Decision to grant or reject the persons application to come to Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your decision:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 5]
[Dis played on the same page as: r22memeklima_a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Granted, this applicant may come to Norway |
1237 |
64.3% |
0.64326573 |
| 2 |
Rejected, this applicant may not come to Norway |
627 |
32.6% |
0.32605304 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
3.1% |
0.03068123 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
r22km_klimnyhet_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
r22KM_klimnyhet.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1915] [Invalid:11782]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To achieve new emission targets, we need to change our habits quickly. This
is what the experts think you can contribute. Ten years ago, eliminating
meat consumption was not considered to be a realistic climate measure, due to
consumers’ preferences. Now the situation has changed, according to researchers. |
474 |
24.8% |
0.2475196 |
| 2 |
To achieve new emission targets, we need to change our habits quickly. The
experts demand a lot from people who want to do their best for the climate.
There is a lot to be done – also by us consumers. The measures require major
lifestyle changes, according to researchers. |
513 |
26.8% |
0.2678851 |
| 3 |
A new report proposes measures to cut emissions equivalent to 40 million
tonnes of CO2 over ten years. Clear cross-party support for the proposals.
Both the government parties and the opposition support the proposals. Many of
the necessary instruments can now be put in place quickly, according to the
Norwegian Minister for Climate and Environment. |
477 |
24.9% |
0.2490862 |
| 4 |
A new report proposes measures to cut emissions equivalent to 40 million tonnes
of CO2 over ten years. But there is little hope of political success for the
proposals. Most of the government parties reject the proposals in the report
commissioned by the government itself. It will be difficult to put the necessary
instruments in place, according to the Norwegian Minister for Climate and
Environment. |
451 |
23.6% |
0.2355091 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11782 |
|
NA |
r22km_klimnyhet
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would you be interested in reading this article?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is the title and introduction to a fictive news article on
proposed measures to reduce emissions, including through changes in
consumption and lifestyle.
[r22KM_klimnyhet_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you be interested in reading this article?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
313 |
16.3% |
0.162766511 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
625 |
32.5% |
0.325013001 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
610 |
31.7% |
0.317212689 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
280 |
14.6% |
0.145605824 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
78 |
4.1% |
0.040561622 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.9% |
0.008840354 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
r22km_saneclim2a
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you go for a walk in the countryside close to where you
live?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you go for a walk in the countryside close to where you
live?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Daily |
481 |
25.0% |
0.25013001 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
978 |
50.9% |
0.50858034 |
| 3 |
Monthly |
309 |
16.1% |
0.16068643 |
| 4 |
A couple of times each year |
93 |
4.8% |
0.04836193 |
| 5 |
Once a year |
13 |
0.7% |
0.00676027 |
| 6 |
Never |
28 |
1.5% |
0.01456058 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.1% |
0.01092044 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
r22km_saneclim2b
|
Variable label:
|
What line of work are you in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you work in:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The oil and gas industry |
80 |
4.2% |
0.04160166 |
| 2 |
The power industry (excluding oil and gas) |
34 |
1.8% |
0.01768071 |
| 3 |
Agriculture |
37 |
1.9% |
0.01924077 |
| 4 |
Fishing |
13 |
0.7% |
0.00676027 |
| 5 |
The travel and tourism industry |
13 |
0.7% |
0.00676027 |
| 6 |
Another sector |
1557 |
81.0% |
0.80967239 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
189 |
9.8% |
0.09828393 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
r22km_saneclim3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: “slowing climate change globally is more important than
preserving nature locally”?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is a threat to humans, animals and plants. However, some
climate measures may harm the local environment. For example, dams or
wind farms that produce renewable energy can also harm nature and
wildlife.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that: “slowing climate change
globally is more important than preserving nature locally”?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
145 |
7.5% |
0.075403016 |
| 2 |
Agree |
386 |
20.1% |
0.200728029 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
491 |
25.5% |
0.255330213 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
317 |
16.5% |
0.164846594 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
242 |
12.6% |
0.125845034 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
187 |
9.7% |
0.097243890 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
137 |
7.1% |
0.071242850 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.9% |
0.009360374 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
r22padkom11_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for r22padkom11.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1910] [Invalid:11787]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Will revoke public support for organisations that help illegal immigrants |
981 |
51.4% |
0.5136126 |
| 2 |
Attitudes towards immigrants are becoming increasingly positive |
929 |
48.6% |
0.4863874 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11787 |
|
NA |
r22padkom11_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for r22padkom11.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1910] [Invalid:11787]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
is based on facts |
501 |
26.2% |
0.2623037 |
| 2 |
is easy to read |
456 |
23.9% |
0.2387435 |
| 3 |
appeals to emotions |
504 |
26.4% |
0.2638743 |
| 4 |
attracts attention |
449 |
23.5% |
0.2350785 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11787 |
|
NA |
r22padkom11
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: This title is based on facts / is easy to read / appeals
to emotions / attracts attention
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is the title of a news article that is based on an actual case
in a Norwegian online newspaper.
[R22PADKOM11_ran1]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
This title [R22PADKOM11_ran2].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
335 |
17.4% |
0.17420697 |
| 2 |
Agree |
413 |
21.5% |
0.21476859 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
396 |
20.6% |
0.20592824 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
339 |
17.6% |
0.17628705 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
205 |
10.7% |
0.10660426 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
144 |
7.5% |
0.07488300 |
| 7 |
Completely disagree |
66 |
3.4% |
0.03432137 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.3% |
0.01300052 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects random variant of R22PADKOMINCL1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3862] [Invalid:9835]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selects R22PADKOMINCL1A. |
1934 |
50.1% |
0.5007768 |
| 2 |
Selects R22PADKOMINCL1B. |
1928 |
49.9% |
0.4992232 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9835 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
More liberal refugee and asylum policy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:687] [Invalid:13010]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
687 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13010 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
More educators per child in kindergartens
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:666] [Invalid:13031]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
666 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13031 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase transfers to higher education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:647] [Invalid:13050]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
647 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13050 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_4
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sharp reduction of oil production
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:641] [Invalid:13056]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
641 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13056 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_5
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
More liberal drug policy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:648] [Invalid:13049]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
648 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13049 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_6
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen introduction programme for refugees
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:674] [Invalid:13023]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
674 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13023 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_7
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen education provision for prison inmates to prevent recidivism
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:649] [Invalid:13048]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
649 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13048 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_8
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen ties with the EU
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:645] [Invalid:13052]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
645 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13052 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_9
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Improve public transport services
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:658] [Invalid:13039]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
658 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13039 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_10
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Improve transgender rights
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:655] [Invalid:13042]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
655 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13042 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_11
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Introduce stronger measures to ensure equal pay between men and women
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:674] [Invalid:13023]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
674 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13023 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_12
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen measures to include people with functional impairments in
working life
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:641] [Invalid:13056]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
641 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13056 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_13
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen the fight against discrimination on the basis of gender,
religion, ethnicity and sexual orientation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:638] [Invalid:13059]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
638 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13059 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_14
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Introduce free hot meals in schools
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:638] [Invalid:13059]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
638 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13059 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_15
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Remove abortion boards
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:619] [Invalid:13078]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
619 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13078 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_16
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase the aid budget
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:594] [Invalid:13103]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
594 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13103 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_17
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Secure a kindergarten place for all children from the month they turn
one
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:631] [Invalid:13066]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
631 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13066 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_ran_18
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Introduce new vocational training programmes to strengthen the
competences of those outside the labour market
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:599] [Invalid:13098]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
599 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13098 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1a_row_order
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Lists the sequential order of the text values as presented
to the respondent in R22PADKOMINCL1A.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1934] [Invalid:11763]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkomincl1b_ran_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
More restrictive refugee and asylum policy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:639] [Invalid:13058]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
639 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13058 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Stronger cooperation with the trade union movement to combat social
dumping
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:625] [Invalid:13072]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
625 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13072 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Remove the life expectancy adjustment to make the old-age pension more
generous
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:655] [Invalid:13042]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
655 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13042 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_4
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Introduce harsher penalties for serious violent crime
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:604] [Invalid:13093]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
604 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13093 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_5
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen the right of self-determination vis-à-vis the EU
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:665] [Invalid:13032]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
665 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13032 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_6
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
More active business policy to support Norwegian industry
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:658] [Invalid:13039]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
658 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13039 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_7
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase unemployment benefits
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:659] [Invalid:13038]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
659 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13038 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_8
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen protection from termination
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:667] [Invalid:13030]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
667 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13030 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_9
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase transfers to the districts
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:652] [Invalid:13045]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
652 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13045 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_10
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reintroduce inheritance tax
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:694] [Invalid:13003]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
694 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13003 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_11
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase taxes on high incomes
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:626] [Invalid:13071]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
626 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13071 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_12
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Stricter requirements for Norwegian language skills for immigrants to be
granted Norwegian citizenship
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:651] [Invalid:13046]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
651 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13046 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_13
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Limit the number of private kindergartens
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:634] [Invalid:13063]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
634 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13063 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_14
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Continue oil extraction from the Norwegian shelf
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:629] [Invalid:13068]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
629 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13068 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_15
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
No to drug liberalisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:627] [Invalid:13070]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
627 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13070 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_16
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen apprenticeship schemes
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:631] [Invalid:13066]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
631 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13066 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_17
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reduce the user payment element for elderly care
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:615] [Invalid:13082]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
615 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13082 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_ran_18
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects 6 values for R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reduce the number of toll stations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:637] [Invalid:13060]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
637 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13060 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b_row_order
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Lists the sequential order of the text values as presented
to the respondent in R22PADKOMINCL1B.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1928] [Invalid:11769]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkomincl1a
|
Variable label:
|
Policy orientation A: How likely would you be to vote for the Labour
Party at the next parliamentary election if this were the party’s new
strategy?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the Labour Party is launching a new strategy or a
stronger focus on the following policy areas for the next parliamentary
election.
[The respondent is shown a list of six randomly selected policy areas
based on r22padkomincl1a_ran_1 to r22padkomincl1a_ran_18]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely would you be to vote for the Labour Party at the next
parliamentary election if this were the party’s new strategy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22padkomincl1_ran = 1 & r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
223 |
11.5% |
0.115305067 |
| 2 |
Likely |
375 |
19.4% |
0.193898656 |
| 3 |
Fairly likely |
520 |
26.9% |
0.268872802 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
529 |
27.4% |
0.273526370 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
283 |
14.6% |
0.146328852 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002068252 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11763 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl1b
|
Variable label:
|
Policy orientation B: How likely would you be to vote for the Labour
Party at the next parliamentary election if this were the party’s new
strategy?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the Labour Party is launching a new strategy or a
stronger focus on the following policy areas for the next parliamentary
election.
[The respondent is shown a list of six randomly selected policy areas
based on r22padkomincl1b_ran_1 to r22padkomincl1b_ran_18]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely would you be to vote for the Labour Party at the next
parliamentary election if this were the party’s new strategy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22padkomincl1_ran = 2 & r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
182 |
9.4% |
0.094398340 |
| 2 |
Likely |
385 |
20.0% |
0.199688797 |
| 3 |
Fairly likely |
521 |
27.0% |
0.270228216 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
555 |
28.8% |
0.287863071 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
278 |
14.4% |
0.144190871 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.4% |
0.003630705 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11769 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_col_order
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Specifies which variant of R22PADKOMINCL1 the respondent
received, and thereby in which column previously randomised values
(R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran or R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran) are to be placed for
R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3859] [Invalid:9838]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The respondent received R22PADKOMINCL1A. Previously selected values are placed
in column 1 (“Version A”) |
1931 |
50.0% |
0.5003887 |
| 2 |
The respondent received R22PADKOMINCL1B. Previously selected values are placed
in column 2 (“Version B”) |
1928 |
50.0% |
0.4996113 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9838 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
More liberal refugee and asylum policy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1321] [Invalid:12376]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1321 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12376 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
More educators per child in kindergartens
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1326] [Invalid:12371]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1326 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12371 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase transfers to higher education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1244] [Invalid:12453]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1244 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12453 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_4
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sharp reduction of oil production
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1316] [Invalid:12381]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1316 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12381 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_5
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
More liberal drug policy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1293] [Invalid:12404]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1293 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12404 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_6
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen introduction programme for refugees
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1348] [Invalid:12349]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1348 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12349 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_7
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen education provision for prison inmates to prevent recidivism
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1289] [Invalid:12408]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1289 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12408 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_8
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen ties with the EU
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1271] [Invalid:12426]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1271 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12426 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_9
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Improve public transport services
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1299] [Invalid:12398]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1299 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12398 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_10
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Improve transgender rights
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1298] [Invalid:12399]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1298 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12399 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_11
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Introduce stronger measures to ensure equal pay between men and women
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1300] [Invalid:12397]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1300 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12397 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_12
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen measures to include people with functional impairments in
working life
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1322] [Invalid:12375]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1322 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12375 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_13
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen the fight against discrimination on the basis of gender,
religion, ethnicity and sexual orientation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1259] [Invalid:12438]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1259 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12438 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_14
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Introduce free hot meals in schools
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1264] [Invalid:12433]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1264 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12433 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_15
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Remove abortion boards
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1267] [Invalid:12430]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1267 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12430 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_16
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase the aid budget
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1235] [Invalid:12462]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1235 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12462 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_17
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Secure a kindergarten place for all children from the month they turn
one
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1278] [Invalid:12419]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1278 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12419 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_a_ran_18
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1A_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Introduce new vocational training programmes to strengthen the
competences of those outside the labour market
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1224] [Invalid:12473]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1224 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12473 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
More restrictive refugee and asylum policy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1276] [Invalid:12421]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1276 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12421 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Stronger cooperation with the trade union movement to combat social
dumping
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1260] [Invalid:12437]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1260 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12437 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Remove the life expectancy adjustment to make the old-age pension more
generous
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1296] [Invalid:12401]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1296 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12401 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_4
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Introduce harsher penalties for serious violent crime
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1264] [Invalid:12433]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1264 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12433 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_5
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen the right of self-determination vis-à-vis the EU
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1307] [Invalid:12390]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1307 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12390 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_6
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
More active business policy to support Norwegian industry
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1294] [Invalid:12403]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1294 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12403 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_7
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase unemployment benefits
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1293] [Invalid:12404]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1293 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12404 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_8
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen protection from termination
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1318] [Invalid:12379]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1318 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12379 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_9
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase transfers to the districts
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1327] [Invalid:12370]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1327 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12370 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_10
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reintroduce inheritance tax
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1359] [Invalid:12338]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1359 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12338 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_11
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase taxes on high incomes
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1299] [Invalid:12398]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1299 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12398 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_12
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Stricter requirements for Norwegian language skills for immigrants to be
granted Norwegian citizenship
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1283] [Invalid:12414]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1283 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12414 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_13
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Limit the number of private kindergartens
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1246] [Invalid:12451]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1246 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12451 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_14
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Continue oil extraction from the Norwegian shelf
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1258] [Invalid:12439]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1258 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12439 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_15
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
No to drug liberalisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1279] [Invalid:12418]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1279 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12418 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_16
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen apprenticeship schemes
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1298] [Invalid:12399]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1298 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12399 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_17
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reduce the user payment element for elderly care
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:12477]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1220 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12477 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2_b_ran_18
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==2, the same 6 values as were drawn in
R22PADKOMINCL1B_ran are specified. If R22PADKOMINCL1_ran==1, 6 values
are randomly selected. For R22PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reduce the number of toll stations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1277] [Invalid:12420]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1277 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12420 |
|
NA |
r22padkomincl2a_row_order
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Specifies the rowwise order of the text values for
PADKOMINCL2_A_ran as they were presented to the respondent in
PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:3859] [Invalid:9838]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkomincl2b_row_order
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Specifies the rowwise order of the text values for
PADKOMINCL2_B_ran as they were presented to the respondent in
PADKOMINCL2.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:3859] [Invalid:9838]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkomincl2
|
Variable label:
|
If you had to choose between these two, which version makes it most
likely that you would vote Labour?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we ask you to compare two fictive versions of the Labour Party,
which is launching a new strategy or stronger initiatives in the
following areas:
[The respondent is shown a table with two columns (“Version A” and
“Version B”) where 2x6 randomly selected policy areas are listed. See
background variables]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to choose between these two, which version makes it most
likely that you would vote Labour?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 2,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Edition A |
1884 |
48.6% |
0.48594274 |
| 2 |
Edition B |
1877 |
48.4% |
0.48413722 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
116 |
3.0% |
0.02992004 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9820 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_ressursfordeling_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22TDR_ressursfordeling.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2000] [Invalid:11697]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
People who live in the districts |
448 |
22.4% |
0.2240 |
| 2 |
People who live in the towns and cities |
402 |
20.1% |
0.2010 |
| 3 |
Working people living in the districts |
370 |
18.5% |
0.1850 |
| 4 |
Working people living in the towns and cities |
389 |
19.4% |
0.1945 |
| 5 |
Working people |
391 |
19.6% |
0.1955 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11697 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_ressursfordeling
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Politician’s statement on the campaign trail
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a politician on the campaign trail made the following
statement:
“It’s time for [R22TDR_ressursfordeling_ran] to get more in return
for their taxes.”
|
|
Literal question:
|
How far do you agree or disagree with this politician?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
220 |
11.0% |
0.109945027 |
| 2 |
Agree |
297 |
14.8% |
0.148425787 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
383 |
19.1% |
0.191404298 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
504 |
25.2% |
0.251874063 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
213 |
10.6% |
0.106446777 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
243 |
12.1% |
0.121439280 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
133 |
6.6% |
0.066466767 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.4% |
0.003998001 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22kmsassy1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is the climate issue for you personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is the climate issue for you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
529 |
26.4% |
0.264367816 |
| 2 |
Important |
825 |
41.2% |
0.412293853 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
455 |
22.7% |
0.227386307 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
143 |
7.1% |
0.071464268 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
40 |
2.0% |
0.019990005 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.4% |
0.004497751 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22kmsassy2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think climate change will be harmful for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think climate change will be harmful for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a great extent |
196 |
9.8% |
0.097951024 |
| 2 |
To some extent |
919 |
45.9% |
0.459270365 |
| 3 |
To a small extent |
707 |
35.3% |
0.353323338 |
| 4 |
Not at all |
135 |
6.7% |
0.067466267 |
| 5 |
Don’t know |
27 |
1.3% |
0.013493253 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.8% |
0.008495752 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22kmsassy3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think climate change will be harmful for future
generations?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think climate change will be harmful for future
generations?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a great extent |
1240 |
62.0% |
0.619690155 |
| 2 |
To some extent |
547 |
27.3% |
0.273363318 |
| 3 |
To a small extent |
138 |
6.9% |
0.068965517 |
| 4 |
Not at all |
33 |
1.6% |
0.016491754 |
| 5 |
Don’t know |
24 |
1.2% |
0.011994003 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009495252 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22kmsassy4
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very concerned |
370 |
18.5% |
0.184907546 |
| 2 |
Concerned |
746 |
37.3% |
0.372813593 |
| 3 |
Somewhat concerned |
534 |
26.7% |
0.266866567 |
| 4 |
Not particularly concerned |
266 |
13.3% |
0.132933533 |
| 5 |
Not at all concerned |
73 |
3.6% |
0.036481759 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.6% |
0.005997001 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_bekymret_oppfolging1_pipe
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Text piping for r22KM_bekymret_oppfolging1 based on response
given in r22kmsassy4.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1989] [Invalid:11708]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
is very concerned |
370 |
18.6% |
0.18602313 |
| 2 |
is concerned |
746 |
37.5% |
0.37506285 |
| 3 |
is somewhat concerned |
534 |
26.8% |
0.26847662 |
| 4 |
is not particularly concerned |
266 |
13.4% |
0.13373555 |
| 5 |
not at all concerned |
73 |
3.7% |
0.03670186 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11708 |
|
NA |
r22km_bekymret_oppfolging1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What is the reason that you are concerned / not concerned for
climate change?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have answered that you [r22KM_bekymret_oppfolging1_pipe] for climate
change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the reason that you [r22KM_bekymret_oppfolging1_pipe]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses
are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if
you would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22kmsassy4 is answered & r22group = 1]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22km_folelser_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experience the following in regards to climate change: Hope
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hope
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
89 |
4.4% |
0.04447776 |
| 2 |
A little |
307 |
15.3% |
0.15342329 |
| 3 |
To a degree |
1088 |
54.4% |
0.54372814 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
412 |
20.6% |
0.20589705 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
60 |
3.0% |
0.02998501 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
2.2% |
0.02248876 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_folelser_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experience the following in regards to climate change: Sadness
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sadness
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
226 |
11.3% |
0.11294353 |
| 2 |
A little |
449 |
22.4% |
0.22438781 |
| 3 |
To a degree |
823 |
41.1% |
0.41129435 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
384 |
19.2% |
0.19190405 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
69 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
2.5% |
0.02498751 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_folelser_3
|
Variable label:
|
Experience the following in regards to climate change: Fear
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
290 |
14.5% |
0.14492754 |
| 2 |
A little |
587 |
29.3% |
0.29335332 |
| 3 |
To a degree |
808 |
40.4% |
0.40379810 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
227 |
11.3% |
0.11344328 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
31 |
1.5% |
0.01549225 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
2.9% |
0.02898551 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_folelser_4
|
Variable label:
|
Experience the following in regards to climate change: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
393 |
19.6% |
0.19640180 |
| 2 |
A little |
583 |
29.1% |
0.29135432 |
| 3 |
To a degree |
632 |
31.6% |
0.31584208 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
249 |
12.4% |
0.12443778 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
80 |
4.0% |
0.03998001 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
3.2% |
0.03198401 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_folelser_5
|
Variable label:
|
Experience the following in regards to climate change: Guilt
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Guilt
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
377 |
18.8% |
0.188405797 |
| 2 |
A little |
677 |
33.8% |
0.338330835 |
| 3 |
To a degree |
762 |
38.1% |
0.380809595 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
114 |
5.7% |
0.056971514 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006496752 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
2.9% |
0.028985507 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_plikt
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you regard it as a moral duty for individuals to
contribute towards preventing climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what degree do you regard it as a moral duty for individuals to
contribute towards preventing climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
389 |
19.4% |
0.19440280 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
865 |
43.2% |
0.43228386 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
554 |
27.7% |
0.27686157 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
124 |
6.2% |
0.06196902 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
48 |
2.4% |
0.02398801 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.0% |
0.01049475 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_avgift
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Increase carbon tax
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the spring of 2021, the government proposed to gradually increase the
carbon tax. The purpose of the tax is to make it worthwhile for
companies to reduce emissions, and for consumers to choose goods and
services produced with lower emissions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How far do you agree or disagree that the carbon tax should be
increased?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
405 |
20.2% |
0.20239880 |
| 2 |
Agree |
602 |
30.1% |
0.30084958 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
399 |
19.9% |
0.19940030 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
246 |
12.3% |
0.12293853 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
101 |
5.0% |
0.05047476 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
104 |
5.2% |
0.05197401 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
123 |
6.1% |
0.06146927 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.0% |
0.01049475 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_aktivist
|
Variable label:
|
Support or oppose people engaging in non-violent civil disobedience to
prevent climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you support or oppose people engaging in non-violent
civil disobedience and protests to exert pressure on the authorities to
act to prevent climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly in favour |
207 |
10.3% |
0.10344828 |
| 2 |
In favour |
406 |
20.3% |
0.20289855 |
| 3 |
Somewhat in favour |
436 |
21.8% |
0.21789105 |
| 4 |
Neither for nor against |
424 |
21.2% |
0.21189405 |
| 5 |
Somewhat against |
163 |
8.1% |
0.08145927 |
| 6 |
Against |
199 |
9.9% |
0.09945027 |
| 7 |
Strongly against |
140 |
7.0% |
0.06996502 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.3% |
0.01299350 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_aktivist2
|
Variable label:
|
Likelihood to join a protest for increased action by the government to
prevent climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely are you, over the next 12 months, to join a protest for
increased action by the government to prevent climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
33 |
1.6% |
0.01649175 |
| 2 |
Likely |
87 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
| 3 |
Fairly likely |
246 |
12.3% |
0.12293853 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
750 |
37.5% |
0.37481259 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
856 |
42.8% |
0.42778611 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01449275 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_parisavtalen
|
Variable label:
|
Paris Agreement: How likely that Norway achieve this goal in time?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Under the 2015 Paris Agreement, Norway has committed to cutting 40%
of national emissions by 2030, compared with the 1990 emissions
level.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely do you think Norway is to achieve this goal in time?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
25 |
1.2% |
0.01249375 |
| 2 |
Likely |
241 |
12.0% |
0.12043978 |
| 3 |
Fairly likely |
742 |
37.1% |
0.37081459 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
810 |
40.5% |
0.40479760 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
154 |
7.7% |
0.07696152 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01449275 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_livsendringer
|
Variable label:
|
Individual lifestyle changes necessary in order to achieve emission
reductions.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
It is constantly discussed who has the greatest responsibility for
ensuring that we achieve the climate commitments made under the Paris
Agreement. Governments and the business community are often highlighted,
but individuals can also be claimed to share responsibility
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you consider it necessary for the population to make
individual lifestyle changes in order for Norway to achieve the adopted
emission reductions?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
202 |
10.1% |
0.10094953 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
645 |
32.2% |
0.32233883 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
803 |
40.1% |
0.40129935 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
246 |
12.3% |
0.12293853 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
76 |
3.8% |
0.03798101 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01449275 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_aktor_utslipp
|
Variable label:
|
Which parties do you consider most central to reduce emissions in
Norway?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Fulfilling the obligations under the Paris Agreement will probably
require contributions and cooperation from several parties in society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to point out one, which of these parties do you consider
most central to efforts to reduce emissions in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian authorities, through their regulatory policy |
1247 |
62.3% |
0.62318841 |
| 2 |
The private business community, by investing in green energy and industry |
479 |
23.9% |
0.23938031 |
| 3 |
Special interest organisations, which can influence the political agenda |
46 |
2.3% |
0.02298851 |
| 4 |
Individual households, by reducing their own consumption |
114 |
5.7% |
0.05697151 |
| 5 |
Other operators |
66 |
3.3% |
0.03298351 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
49 |
2.4% |
0.02448776 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_tilnarming_livsendring
|
Variable label:
|
Which central government approach do you consider most appropriate to
create lasting change in lifestyle and consumption habits?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the Norwegian population is to change lifestyle and consumption
habits, which central government approach do you consider most
appropriate to create lasting change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Public education to disseminate knowledge of the consequences of climate change
and possible solutions |
310 |
15.5% |
0.15492254 |
| 2 |
Development of a green economy that facilitates environmentally friendly
consumption |
886 |
44.3% |
0.44277861 |
| 3 |
Introduction of national policies to regulate polluting behaviour through e.g.
prohibitions, taxes and subsidy schemes, etc. |
496 |
24.8% |
0.24787606 |
| 4 |
Encouragement of the population to take responsibility for their own
environmental-related actions |
185 |
9.2% |
0.09245377 |
| 5 |
Other approach |
74 |
3.7% |
0.03698151 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
2.5% |
0.02498751 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22kmmeat1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for r22kmmeat1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1978] [Invalid:11719]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Production |
977 |
49.4% |
0.4939333 |
| 2 |
Consumption |
1001 |
50.6% |
0.5060667 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11719 |
|
NA |
r22kmmeat1_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for r22kmmeat1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1978] [Invalid:11719]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway |
641 |
32.4% |
0.3240647 |
| 2 |
Europe |
678 |
34.3% |
0.3427705 |
| 3 |
World |
659 |
33.3% |
0.3331648 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11719 |
|
NA |
r22kmmeat1_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for r22kmmeat1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1978] [Invalid:11719]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
to limit climate change |
953 |
48.2% |
0.4817998 |
| 2 |
[blank] |
1025 |
51.8% |
0.5182002 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11719 |
|
NA |
r22kmmeat1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: meat production/consumption must be reduced.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How far do you agree or disagree that meat [r22kmmeat1_ran1] in
[r22kmmeat1_ran2] must be reduced [r22kmmeat1_ran3]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
245 |
12.2% |
0.12243878 |
| 2 |
Agree |
361 |
18.0% |
0.18040980 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
485 |
24.2% |
0.24237881 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
387 |
19.3% |
0.19340330 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
119 |
5.9% |
0.05947026 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
219 |
10.9% |
0.10944528 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
157 |
7.8% |
0.07846077 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.4% |
0.01399300 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_kjottkonsum
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you usually eat red meat for dinner?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Red meat is meat from pigs, cattle, sheep and goats.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you usually eat red meat for dinner?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006496752 |
| 2 |
4-6 days a week |
260 |
13.0% |
0.129935032 |
| 3 |
2-3 days a week |
919 |
45.9% |
0.459270365 |
| 4 |
1 day a week or less |
672 |
33.6% |
0.335832084 |
| 5 |
I do not eat red meat, but I eat lean meat |
64 |
3.2% |
0.031984008 |
| 6 |
I do not eat meat (vegan, vegetarian, pescetarian or similar) |
44 |
2.2% |
0.021989005 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.4% |
0.014492754 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22km_mindre_kjott
|
Variable label:
|
How willing are you to eat less red meat than you do today?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the spring of 2021, the Norwegian government set a target for the
population to follow the dietary advice from the Norwegian Directorate
of Health, as part of the “Climate Plan for 2021-2030”. The dietary
advice recommends limiting the amount of red meat to 500 grammes per
week per person. If people follow this advice, it will reduce the demand
for meat, thereby reducing emissions from meat production in
agriculture.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to eat less red meat than you do today?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22km_kjottkonsum = 1,2,3,4 & r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not willing at all |
225 |
12.1% |
0.120708155 |
| 2 |
Not very willing |
356 |
19.1% |
0.190987124 |
| 3 |
Fairly willing |
534 |
28.6% |
0.286480687 |
| 4 |
Willing |
519 |
27.8% |
0.278433476 |
| 5 |
Very willing |
228 |
12.2% |
0.122317597 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001072961 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11833 |
|
NA |
r22padkom32_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative in r22PADKOM32. 1-4
must have r22PADKOM32, 5 is not exposed to this question, but go
straight to r22PADKOM33.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1977] [Invalid:11720]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Promoting a message that the gay lobby is damaging Norwegian society |
380 |
19.2% |
0.1922104 |
| 2 |
Promoting a message that multiculturalism is damaging Norwegian society |
388 |
19.6% |
0.1962570 |
| 3 |
Promoting a message that Islam and Muslim immigration pose a threat women's and
gay rights |
395 |
20.0% |
0.1997977 |
| 4 |
Burning the Koran |
404 |
20.4% |
0.2043500 |
| 5 |
[Does not get r22padkom32] |
410 |
20.7% |
0.2073849 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11720 |
|
NA |
r22padkom32
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable/unacceptable: Far right activists prevented from
[r22padkom32_ran]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following scenario. During a public demonstration, a group
of counter-demonstrators physically attack activists from the far right
to prevent them from [r22PADKOM32_ran].
|
|
Literal question:
|
How acceptable or unacceptable do you think it is for the
counter-demonstrators to physically attack activists from the far right
to prevent them from doing this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22padkom32_ran = 1,2,3,4 & r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly acceptable |
41 |
2.6% |
0.026164646 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
33 |
2.1% |
0.021059349 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
62 |
4.0% |
0.039566050 |
| 4 |
Neither acceptable nor unacceptable |
123 |
7.8% |
0.078493937 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unacceptable |
119 |
7.6% |
0.075941289 |
| 6 |
Unacceptable |
568 |
36.2% |
0.362476069 |
| 7 |
Highly unacceptable |
608 |
38.8% |
0.388002553 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.8% |
0.008296107 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12130 |
|
NA |
r22padkom33
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Far right activist groups should be allowed to rent
community centres in my local area.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Activist groups from the far right should be allowed to rent community
centres in my local area to hold meetings for their members and
sympathisers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
96 |
4.8% |
0.04797601 |
| 2 |
Agree |
242 |
12.1% |
0.12093953 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
243 |
12.1% |
0.12143928 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
361 |
18.0% |
0.18040980 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
247 |
12.3% |
0.12343828 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
398 |
19.9% |
0.19890055 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
379 |
18.9% |
0.18940530 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.7% |
0.01749125 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22padkom34
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I tend to exploit others for my own gain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I tend to exploit others for my own gain.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001499250 |
| 2 |
Agree |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002498751 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
31 |
1.5% |
0.015492254 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
83 |
4.1% |
0.041479260 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
100 |
5.0% |
0.049975012 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
681 |
34.0% |
0.340329835 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1066 |
53.3% |
0.532733633 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.6% |
0.015992004 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11696 |
|
NA |
r22kmmeat2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for r22kmmeat2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1952] [Invalid:11745]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Production |
994 |
50.9% |
0.5092213 |
| 2 |
Consumption |
958 |
49.1% |
0.4907787 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11745 |
|
NA |
r22kmmeat2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What do you think when you hear or read about reducing meat
production/consumption?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read about reducing
meat[r22kmmeat2_ran]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses
are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if
you would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 2]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22kmvestforsk1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: My municipality will be adversely affected by climate
change.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
My municipality will be adversely affected by climate change over the
next 10 years.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
211 |
10.8% |
0.107983623 |
| 2 |
Agree |
436 |
22.3% |
0.223132037 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
479 |
24.5% |
0.245138178 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
474 |
24.3% |
0.242579324 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
126 |
6.4% |
0.064483112 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
158 |
8.1% |
0.080859775 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
60 |
3.1% |
0.030706244 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.5% |
0.005117707 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11743 |
|
NA |
r22kmvestforsk2
|
Variable label:
|
Climate change: Which event will have the greatest impact?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is expected to have an impact in various areas.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following events do you think will have the greatest impact
in your municipality over the next 10 years?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Periods of heavy rain |
871 |
44.6% |
0.44575230 |
| 2 |
Periods of heavy drought |
193 |
9.9% |
0.09877175 |
| 3 |
Periods of very high or low temperatures |
185 |
9.5% |
0.09467758 |
| 4 |
Storm/hurricane |
117 |
6.0% |
0.05987718 |
| 5 |
Landslides |
79 |
4.0% |
0.04042989 |
| 6 |
Rising sea level |
79 |
4.0% |
0.04042989 |
| 7 |
Floods |
95 |
4.9% |
0.04861822 |
| 8 |
Other: |
79 |
4.0% |
0.04042989 |
| 9 |
I don't think climate change will have an impact |
242 |
12.4% |
0.12384852 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.7% |
0.00716479 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11743 |
|
NA |
r22kmvestforsk2_8_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which event will have the greatest impact?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is expected to have an impact in various areas.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 2]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22kmvestforsk3
|
Variable label:
|
When will Norway suffer the negative consequences of climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
When do you think Norway will really suffer the negative consequences of
climate change (more rain, drought, storms, landslides, floods and storm
surges)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
We're suffering them now. |
912 |
46.7% |
0.46673490 |
| 2 |
The next decade |
498 |
25.5% |
0.25486182 |
| 3 |
In 20-50 years |
305 |
15.6% |
0.15609007 |
| 4 |
In more than 50 years |
105 |
5.4% |
0.05373593 |
| 5 |
Never |
110 |
5.6% |
0.05629478 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.2% |
0.01228250 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11743 |
|
NA |
r22kmvestforsk4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: New road projects are more important than protecting
existing roads.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is more important to spend money on new road projects than on
protecting existing roads from landslides and avalanches.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
63 |
3.2% |
0.032241556 |
| 2 |
Agree |
127 |
6.5% |
0.064994882 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
197 |
10.1% |
0.100818833 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
399 |
20.4% |
0.204196520 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
416 |
21.3% |
0.212896622 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
466 |
23.8% |
0.238485159 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
271 |
13.9% |
0.138689867 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.8% |
0.007676561 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11743 |
|
NA |
r22kmvestforsk5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I am willing to pay higher tolls for roads I use
regularly.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am willing to pay higher tolls for roads I use regularly to ensure
that these roads are better protected from landslides and avalanches.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
129 |
6.6% |
0.06601842 |
| 2 |
Agree |
424 |
21.7% |
0.21699079 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
451 |
23.1% |
0.23080860 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
319 |
16.3% |
0.16325486 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
199 |
10.2% |
0.10184237 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
233 |
11.9% |
0.11924258 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
171 |
8.8% |
0.08751279 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.4% |
0.01432958 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11743 |
|
NA |
r22kmvestforsk6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Confident that the authorities protect the population
from climate change.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am confident that the authorities will take the necessary measures to
protect the population from the negative consequences of climate change
(more rain, drought, storms, landslides, floods and storm surges).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
51 |
2.6% |
0.026100307 |
| 2 |
Agree |
406 |
20.8% |
0.207778915 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
620 |
31.7% |
0.317297851 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
283 |
14.5% |
0.144831116 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
294 |
15.0% |
0.150460594 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
204 |
10.4% |
0.104401228 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
80 |
4.1% |
0.040941658 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.8% |
0.008188332 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11743 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_fairgov2_kjonn1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22PADKOM_fairgov2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3077] [Invalid:10620]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
women than men |
1581 |
51.4% |
0.5138122 |
| 2 |
men than women |
1496 |
48.6% |
0.4861878 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10620 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_fairgov2_kjonn2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Specifies text piping alternative for r22padkom_fairgov2
based on randomly chosen value in R22PADKOM_fairgov2_kjonn1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigns value to r22padkom_fairgov2. Assigns the same numeric value as
in r22padkom_fairgov2_kjonn1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3077] [Invalid:10620]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
men than women |
1581 |
51.4% |
0.5138122 |
| 2 |
women than men |
1496 |
48.6% |
0.4861878 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10620 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_fairgov2_komite
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22PADKOM_fairgov2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3077] [Invalid:10620]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A committee of experts in machine learning has assessed both models, and
recommends the first model. |
770 |
25.0% |
0.2502437 |
| 2 |
A committee of experts in machine learning has assessed both models, and
recommends the second model. |
808 |
26.3% |
0.2625934 |
| 3 |
A representative committee of experts in machine learning has assessed both
models, and recommends the first model. The committee that has been formed is
expected to reflect all layers of the population in terms of age, education,
gender, place of residence, religious beliefs, ethnic background, work
experience and sexual orientation. |
739 |
24.0% |
0.2401690 |
| 4 |
A representative committee of experts in machine learning has assessed both
models, and recommends the second model. The committee that has been formed is
expected to reflect all layers of the population in terms of age, education,
gender, place of residence, religious beliefs, ethnic background, work
experience and sexual orientation. |
760 |
24.7% |
0.2469938 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10620 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_fairgov2
|
Variable label:
|
Machine learning in NAV: Which algorithm works most fairly?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Machine learning is also often referred to as artificial
intelligence.
Using machine learning involves getting computers to learn how to
solve tasks based on data. One dilemma that often arises is that
different algorithms present different advantages and drawbacks, making
it necessary to choose which considerations to prioritise.
A realistic example of where machine learning can be used in public
administration is when NAV (the Norwegian Labour and Welfare
Administration) decides which people on sick leave will be offered a
dialogue meeting with NAV. A dialogue meeting is a conversation between
NAV and the person on sick leave to increase their chances of returning
to work. Imagine that NAV has to choose between implementing one of
these two algorithms:
The first algorithm is most accurate. Among those who need a dialogue
meeting, more [R22PADKOM_fairgov2_kjonn1] are offered a dialogue
meeting. The proportion who need a dialogue meeting without being
offered one is thus greater for [R22PADKOM_fairgov2_kjonn2].
The second algorithm ensures that the proportion of persons on sick
leave who are called in for a dialogue meeting is equally large for
women and men. However, it is less accurate in overall terms, so that
fewer people who need a dialogue meeting are called in. This applies to
both women and men.
[R22PADKOM_fairgov2_komite]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If it was only between these two, which one do you think seems most
fair?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2,6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The first algorithm seems most fair |
1532 |
49.4% |
0.49355670 |
| 2 |
The second algorithm seems most fair |
1401 |
45.1% |
0.45135309 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
171 |
5.5% |
0.05509021 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10593 |
|
NA |
r22km_wind_a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More onshore wind power should be developed in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please consider these statements about wind power in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
More onshore wind power should be developed in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
152 |
7.7% |
0.077353690 |
| 2 |
Agree |
336 |
17.1% |
0.170992366 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
375 |
19.1% |
0.190839695 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
223 |
11.3% |
0.113486005 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
249 |
12.7% |
0.126717557 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
301 |
15.3% |
0.153180662 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
323 |
16.4% |
0.164376590 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003053435 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22km_wind_b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More offshore wind power should be developed in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
More offshore wind power should be developed in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
442 |
22.5% |
0.224936387 |
| 2 |
Agree |
665 |
33.8% |
0.338422392 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
387 |
19.7% |
0.196946565 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
179 |
9.1% |
0.091094148 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
96 |
4.9% |
0.048854962 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
96 |
4.9% |
0.048854962 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
86 |
4.4% |
0.043765903 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.7% |
0.007124682 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
r22KM_hydro_fra_vind.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1962] [Invalid:11735]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
981 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| 2 |
Power from the wind farm will be used to produce emission-free hydrogen. |
981 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11735 |
|
NA |
r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
r22KM_hydro_fra_vind.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1962] [Invalid:11735]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
649 |
33.1% |
0.3307849 |
| 2 |
The project’s developer would set up a fund to discount the electricity bills of
neighbouring households. |
642 |
32.7% |
0.3272171 |
| 3 |
Decreases in the valuation of properties near the facility will be compensated
for by the project's developer. |
671 |
34.2% |
0.3419980 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11735 |
|
NA |
r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
r22KM_hydro_fra_vind.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 3]
[Conditional randomization. Randomly selects 1 or 2 if
r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran1 = 1, and 1 or 3 if r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran1 =
2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1962] [Invalid:11735]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
978 |
49.8% |
0.4984709 |
| 2 |
The power produced from the wind farm will contribute to increasing the share of
renewable electricity in the power market. |
513 |
26.1% |
0.2614679 |
| 3 |
The hydrogen produced will be distributed and sold to local operators to replace
fossil energy sources in transport and industry. |
471 |
24.0% |
0.2400612 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11735 |
|
NA |
r22km_hydro_fra_vind_qpipe
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects alternative for text piping for r22km_hydro_fra_vind
depending on the values in r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran1,
r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran2, r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran3
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigns text substitution for r22km_hydro_fra_vind. Assigns 1 if
r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran1, r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran2 or
r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran3 != 1. Assigns 2 if r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran1 =
1 and r22km_hydro_fra_vind_ran3 = 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1962] [Invalid:11735]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Based solely on this information, to what extent |
1494 |
76.1% |
0.7614679 |
| 2 |
To what extent |
468 |
23.9% |
0.2385321 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11735 |
|
NA |
r22km_hydro_fra_vind
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: onshore wind farm in your home municipality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a proposal to build a onshore wind farm in your home
municipality. [r22KM_hydro_fra_vind_ran1]
[r22KM_hydro_fra_vind_ran2]
[r22KM_hydro_fra_vind_ran3]
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r22KM_hydro_fra_vind_qPipe] do you support or oppose this project?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
106 |
5.4% |
0.053944020 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
286 |
14.6% |
0.145547074 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
442 |
22.5% |
0.224936387 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
263 |
13.4% |
0.133842239 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
258 |
13.1% |
0.131297710 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
292 |
14.9% |
0.148600509 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
314 |
16.0% |
0.159796438 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002035623 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22km22_oljefremtid
|
Variable label:
|
Larger/smaller: How the oil and gas industry in Norway should be
developed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Oil and gas production is an important industry for Norway. The
industry provides many jobs and substantial revenues. At the same time,
burning fossil energy is the main cause of climate change. Opening up
new areas is controversial because it can affect marine life and life at
the edge of the ice cap. There is frequent debate about how the oil and
gas industry in Norway should be developed over the next 20 to 30
years.
Which of the following options is closest to your view?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be …
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
[Answer list display order: Random direction]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
As large as possible |
104 |
5.3% |
0.052926209 |
| 2 |
Larger than today |
59 |
3.0% |
0.030025445 |
| 3 |
Just as large as today |
440 |
22.4% |
0.223918575 |
| 4 |
Smaller than today |
743 |
37.8% |
0.378117048 |
| 5 |
As small as possible |
606 |
30.8% |
0.308396947 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.7% |
0.006615776 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_infotillit1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects hypothetical Facebook post related to
health for R22PADKOM_infotillit1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1957] [Invalid:11740]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
helse_uten_l_4_c_3_s_2.png |
212 |
10.8% |
0.1083291 |
| 2 |
helse_uten_l_4_c_316_s_5.png |
233 |
11.9% |
0.1190598 |
| 3 |
helse_uten_l_4_c_38_s_121.png |
208 |
10.6% |
0.1062851 |
| 4 |
helse_uten_l_51_c_3_s_121.png |
231 |
11.8% |
0.1180378 |
| 5 |
helse_uten_l_51_c_316_s_2.png |
228 |
11.7% |
0.1165049 |
| 6 |
helse_uten_l_51_c_38_s_5.png |
200 |
10.2% |
0.1021972 |
| 7 |
helse_uten_l_512_c_3_s_5.png |
218 |
11.1% |
0.1113950 |
| 8 |
helse_uten_l_512_c_316_s_121.png |
214 |
10.9% |
0.1093510 |
| 9 |
helse_uten_l_512_c_38_s_2.png |
213 |
10.9% |
0.1088401 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11740 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_infotillit1_ran1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects sender of hypothetical Facebook post
related to health for R22PADKOM_infotillit1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1957] [Invalid:11740]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Norwegian Institute of Public Health |
388 |
19.8% |
0.1982626 |
| 2 |
Ministry of Health and Care Services |
392 |
20.0% |
0.2003066 |
| 3 |
Minister of Health and Care Services Ingvild Kjerkol |
404 |
20.6% |
0.2064384 |
| 4 |
Minister of Health and Care Services Ingvild Kjerkol from the Labour Party |
398 |
20.3% |
0.2033725 |
| 5 |
The Labour Party |
375 |
19.2% |
0.1916198 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11740 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_infotillit1_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects hypothetical Facebook post related to
culture for R22PADKOM_infotillit1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1957] [Invalid:11740]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
uten_uten_l_4_c_3_s_2.png |
225 |
11.5% |
0.11497190 |
| 2 |
uten_uten_l_4_c_316_s_5.png |
222 |
11.3% |
0.11343894 |
| 3 |
uten_uten_l_4_c_38_s_121.png |
213 |
10.9% |
0.10884006 |
| 4 |
uten_uten_l_51_c_3_s_121.png |
194 |
9.9% |
0.09913132 |
| 5 |
uten_uten_l_51_c_316_s_2.png |
218 |
11.1% |
0.11139499 |
| 6 |
uten_uten_l_51_c_38_s_5.png |
223 |
11.4% |
0.11394992 |
| 7 |
uten_uten_l_512_c_3_s_5.png |
228 |
11.7% |
0.11650485 |
| 8 |
uten_uten_l_512_c_316_s_121.png |
207 |
10.6% |
0.10577414 |
| 9 |
uten_uten_l_512_c_38_s_2.png |
227 |
11.6% |
0.11599387 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11740 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_infotillit1_ran2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects sender of hypothetical Facebook post
related to culture for R22PADKOM_infotillit1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1957] [Invalid:11740]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Arts Council Norway |
370 |
18.9% |
0.1890649 |
| 2 |
The Ministry of Culture |
403 |
20.6% |
0.2059274 |
| 3 |
Minister of Culture Anette Trettebergstuen |
411 |
21.0% |
0.2100153 |
| 4 |
Minister of Culture Anette Trettebergstuen from the Labour Party |
399 |
20.4% |
0.2038835 |
| 5 |
The Labour Party |
374 |
19.1% |
0.1911088 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11740 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_infotillit1_helse
|
Variable label:
|
Facebook post about health: To what extent would you trust the content
of this hypothetical post?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that [R22PADKOM_infotillit1_ran1_1] published the following
post on its Facebook page:
[The respondent is shown a simulated Facebook post. See background
variables]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you trust the content of this hypothetical post?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
249 |
12.7% |
0.126717557 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
543 |
27.6% |
0.276335878 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
434 |
22.1% |
0.220865140 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
414 |
21.1% |
0.210687023 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
309 |
15.7% |
0.157251908 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.8% |
0.008142494 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_infotillit2_helse
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think the content of this hypothetical post is
politically biased?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the content of this hypothetical post is
politically biased?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
81 |
4.1% |
0.04122137 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
174 |
8.9% |
0.08854962 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
382 |
19.4% |
0.19440204 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
768 |
39.1% |
0.39083969 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
528 |
26.9% |
0.26870229 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.6% |
0.01628499 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_infotillit1_kultur
|
Variable label:
|
Facebook post about culture: To what extent would you trust the content
of this hypothetical post?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that [R22PADKOM_infotillit1_ran2_1] published the following
post on their Facebook page:
[The respondent is shown a simulated Facebook post. See background
variables]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you trust the content of this hypothetical post?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
148 |
7.5% |
0.07531807 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
505 |
25.7% |
0.25699746 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
673 |
34.2% |
0.34249364 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
410 |
20.9% |
0.20865140 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
205 |
10.4% |
0.10432570 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.2% |
0.01221374 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_infotillit2_kultur
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think the content of this hypothetical post is
politically biased?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the content of this hypothetical post is
politically biased?
|
|
Post-question:
|
[Text displayed on the next page after the question: Please remember
that this was a hypothetical example and not something that has been
written on Facebook. The text in the posts is therefore not correct
information.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
92 |
4.7% |
0.04681934 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
236 |
12.0% |
0.12010178 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
563 |
28.7% |
0.28651399 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
684 |
34.8% |
0.34809160 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
361 |
18.4% |
0.18371501 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.5% |
0.01475827 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22meme_mosque_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Experiment. Randomly selects variant of R22MEME_mosque.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1483] [Invalid:12214]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gets R22MEME_mosque1 |
751 |
50.6% |
0.5064059 |
| 2 |
Gets R22MEME_mosque2 |
732 |
49.4% |
0.4935941 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_mosque1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22MEME_mosque1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:751] [Invalid:12946]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
rebuild their mosque to make room for a youth club |
371 |
49.4% |
0.494008 |
| 2 |
build a new mosque |
380 |
50.6% |
0.505992 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12946 |
|
NA |
r22meme_mosque1_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22MEME_mosque1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:751] [Invalid:12946]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Building permits are granted through the ordinary planning process. Do you agree
or disagree with this decision? |
383 |
51.0% |
0.5099867 |
| 2 |
The application is being processed by the municipal planning committee. Do you
agree or disagree that building permits should be granted? |
368 |
49.0% |
0.4900133 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12946 |
|
NA |
r22meme_mosque1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: A local muslim group has applied for building/rebuilding
of mosque
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
A local Muslim group has applied to [R22MEME_mosque1_ran1].
|
|
Literal question:
|
[R22MEME_mosque1_ran2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22meme_mosque_ran = 1 & r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
112 |
14.9% |
0.149134487 |
| 2 |
Agree |
422 |
56.2% |
0.561917443 |
| 3 |
Disagree |
141 |
18.8% |
0.187749667 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
73 |
9.7% |
0.097203728 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003994674 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12946 |
|
NA |
r22meme_mosque2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects variant of R22MEME_mosque2_ran.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:732] [Invalid:12965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selects R22MEME_mosque2a |
391 |
53.4% |
0.534153 |
| 2 |
Selects R22MEME_mosque2b |
341 |
46.6% |
0.465847 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12965 |
|
NA |
r22meme_mosque2a
|
Variable label:
|
Desirable/undesirable: Mosque in municipality near you has applied for
permission to rebuild.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
One of the mosques in the centre of a municipality near you has applied
for permission to rebuild the mosque to ensure that it complies with the
normal health, safety and environmental (HSE) requirements. Without the
redevelopment, the mosque will have to be closed.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think it is desirable for the municipality to
permit the redevelopment?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22meme_mosque_ran = 2 & r22meme_mosque2_ran = 1) &
r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly desirable |
189 |
48.3% |
0.48337596 |
| 2 |
Fairly desirable |
143 |
36.6% |
0.36572890 |
| 3 |
Fairly undesirable |
31 |
7.9% |
0.07928389 |
| 4 |
Highly undesirable |
26 |
6.6% |
0.06649616 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.5% |
0.00511509 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13306 |
|
NA |
r22meme_mosque2b
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable/unacceptable: Mosque in municipality near you has applied for
permission to rebuild.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
One of the mosques in the centre of a municipality near you has applied
for permission to rebuild the mosque to ensure that it complies with the
normal health, safety and environmental (HSE) requirements. Without the
redevelopment, the mosque will have to be closed.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think it is acceptable for the municipality to
permit the redevelopment?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22meme_mosque_ran = 2 & r22meme_mosque2_ran = 2) &
r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly acceptable |
203 |
59.5% |
0.59530792 |
| 2 |
Fairly acceptable |
92 |
27.0% |
0.26979472 |
| 3 |
Fairly unacceptable |
19 |
5.6% |
0.05571848 |
| 4 |
Highly unacceptable |
23 |
6.7% |
0.06744868 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
1.2% |
0.01173021 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13356 |
|
NA |
r22meme_mosque3_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22MEME_mosque3.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:732] [Invalid:12965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
larger |
348 |
47.5% |
0.4754098 |
| 2 |
of the same size |
384 |
52.5% |
0.5245902 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12965 |
|
NA |
r22meme_mosque3_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22MEME_mosque3.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:732] [Invalid:12965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
modern Western |
361 |
49.3% |
0.4931694 |
| 2 |
traditional Islamic |
371 |
50.7% |
0.5068306 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12965 |
|
NA |
r22meme_mosque3
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Muslims want to build a new mosque.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Instead of rebuilding the mosque, some Muslims have wanted to build a
new one. The proposal is to build [R22MEME_mosque3_ran1] the mosque in a
[R22MEME_mosque3_ran2] style.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you support or oppose this proposal?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22meme_mosque_ran = 2 & r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Fully support |
204 |
27.9% |
0.2786885 |
| 2 |
Support a little |
249 |
34.0% |
0.3401639 |
| 3 |
Somewhat oppose |
156 |
21.3% |
0.2131148 |
| 4 |
Fully oppose |
113 |
15.4% |
0.1543716 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
1.4% |
0.0136612 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12965 |
|
NA |
r22meme_secularism_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The great works of philosophy and science are the best
sources of truth, wisdom and ethics.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The great works of philosophy and science are the best sources of truth,
wisdom and ethics.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
215 |
14.5% |
0.14497640 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
813 |
54.8% |
0.54821308 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
358 |
24.1% |
0.24140256 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
63 |
4.2% |
0.04248146 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2.3% |
0.02292650 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_secularism_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: To understand the world, we must free our mindset from
ancient tradition and faith.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To understand the world, we must free our mindset from ancient tradition
and faith.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
424 |
28.6% |
0.28590695 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
710 |
47.9% |
0.47875927 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
247 |
16.7% |
0.16655428 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
83 |
5.6% |
0.05596763 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.3% |
0.01281187 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_secularism_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: When I make important decisions in my life, I mostly
rely on reason and available evidence.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
When I make important decisions in my life, I mostly rely on reason and
available evidence.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
811 |
54.7% |
0.546864464 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
588 |
39.6% |
0.396493594 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
58 |
3.9% |
0.039109912 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
1.0% |
0.010114633 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.7% |
0.007417397 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_secularism_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It is difficult to live a good life based solely on
facts.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is difficult to live a good life based solely on facts.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
237 |
16.0% |
0.15981119 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
704 |
47.5% |
0.47471342 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
343 |
23.1% |
0.23128793 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
171 |
11.5% |
0.11530681 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.9% |
0.01888065 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_community_center_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22MEME_community_center.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1483] [Invalid:12214]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
municipality |
368 |
24.8% |
0.2481457 |
| 2 |
a regional Muslim organisation |
375 |
25.3% |
0.2528658 |
| 3 |
a conservative regional Muslim organisation |
362 |
24.4% |
0.2440998 |
| 4 |
a Muslim organisation based in Turkey |
378 |
25.5% |
0.2548887 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_community_center
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Muslims want to establish a local community centre
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslims want to establish a local community centre where they can
meet in their leisure time and, for example, have dinner together. The
centre will be funded and followed up by [R22MEME_community_center_ran].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree that they should be permitted to establish the
community centre?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
303 |
20.4% |
0.20431558 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
569 |
38.4% |
0.38368173 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
359 |
24.2% |
0.24207687 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
234 |
15.8% |
0.15778827 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.2% |
0.01213756 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_populist_att_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Parliamentary politicians soon lose touch with the
people.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Parliamentary politicians soon lose touch with the people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
296 |
20.0% |
0.19959541 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
695 |
46.9% |
0.46864464 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
406 |
27.4% |
0.27376939 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
67 |
4.5% |
0.04517869 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.3% |
0.01281187 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_populist_att_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The differences between the people and the so-called
elite are far greater than the differences between people.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
he differences between the people and the so-called elite are far
greater than the differences between people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
401 |
27.0% |
0.27039784 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
639 |
43.1% |
0.43088334 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
322 |
21.7% |
0.21712744 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
83 |
5.6% |
0.05596763 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.6% |
0.02562374 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_populist_att_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Politicians talk too much and act too little.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians talk too much and act too little.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
473 |
31.9% |
0.31894808 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
759 |
51.2% |
0.51180040 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
201 |
13.6% |
0.13553608 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
27 |
1.8% |
0.01820634 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.6% |
0.01550910 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_populist_att_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The people should decide the most important political
issues directly through referendums.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The people should decide the most important political issues directly
through referendums.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
237 |
16.0% |
0.15981119 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
483 |
32.6% |
0.32569117 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
468 |
31.6% |
0.31557653 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
276 |
18.6% |
0.18610924 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.3% |
0.01281187 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_populist_att_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The people, not the politicians, should make the most
important political decisions.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The people, not the politicians, should make the most important
political decisions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
161 |
10.9% |
0.10856372 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
470 |
31.7% |
0.31692515 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
564 |
38.0% |
0.38031018 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
264 |
17.8% |
0.17801753 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.6% |
0.01618341 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_populist_att_6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People draw society in the same direction.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
People draw society in the same direction.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
41 |
2.8% |
0.02764666 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
542 |
36.5% |
0.36547539 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
664 |
44.8% |
0.44774107 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
195 |
13.1% |
0.13149022 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
2.8% |
0.02764666 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_populist_att_7
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Ordinary people share in common that they are good and
honest
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Ordinary people share in common that they are good and honest
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
216 |
14.6% |
0.14565071 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
841 |
56.7% |
0.56709373 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
321 |
21.6% |
0.21645314 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
84 |
5.7% |
0.05664194 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.4% |
0.01416049 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_populist_att_8
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People tend to have the same values and interests.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
People tend to have the same values and interests.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
34 |
2.3% |
0.02292650 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
410 |
27.6% |
0.27646662 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
652 |
44.0% |
0.43964936 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
357 |
24.1% |
0.24072825 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
2.0% |
0.02022927 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_school_meals_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22MEME_school_meals.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1476] [Invalid:12221]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
requires |
705 |
47.8% |
0.4776423 |
| 2 |
proposes |
771 |
52.2% |
0.5223577 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12221 |
|
NA |
r22meme_school_meals_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22MEME_school_meals.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1476] [Invalid:12221]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
should no longer serve meals with pork for the sake of Muslim religious rules |
739 |
50.1% |
0.5006775 |
| 2 |
should serve dishes without pork in addition to other dishes for the sake of
Muslim religious rules |
737 |
49.9% |
0.4993225 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12221 |
|
NA |
r22meme_school_meals_pipe3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Specifies value 3 for R22MEME_school_meals.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigns text substitution for r22meme_school_meals. Selects the same
value as in r22meme_school_meals_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1476] [Invalid:12221]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
requirement |
705 |
47.8% |
0.4776423 |
| 2 |
proposal |
771 |
52.2% |
0.5223577 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12221 |
|
NA |
r22meme_school_meals
|
Variable label:
|
Favour/opposed requirement/proposal: Public canteens serve meals with
pork.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some [R22MEME_school_meals_ran1] that public canteens
[R22MEME_school_meals_ran2].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you in favour of or opposed to this
[R22MEME_school_meals_pipe3]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely in favour |
204 |
13.8% |
0.13755900 |
| 2 |
Somewhat in favour |
273 |
18.4% |
0.18408631 |
| 3 |
Somewhat opposed |
249 |
16.8% |
0.16790290 |
| 4 |
Completely opposed |
741 |
50.0% |
0.49966285 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.1% |
0.01078894 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_religious_holidays_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22MEME_religious_holidays.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1476] [Invalid:12221]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
a Christian public holiday be replaced by a Muslim public holiday for the sake
of Muslim religious rules (and to keep the same number of public holidays) |
723 |
49.0% |
0.4898374 |
| 2 |
Muslims be allowed to take time off on a Muslim public holiday for the sake of
Muslim religious rules. The extra day off must be compensated with overtime work |
753 |
51.0% |
0.5101626 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12221 |
|
NA |
r22meme_religious_holidays
|
Variable label:
|
Favour/opposed: Muslim public holiday
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
A proposal has been made that [R22MEME_religious_holidays_ran].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you in favour of or opposed to this proposal?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely in favour |
172 |
11.6% |
0.11598112 |
| 2 |
Somewhat in favour |
354 |
23.9% |
0.23870533 |
| 3 |
Somewhat opposed |
301 |
20.3% |
0.20296696 |
| 4 |
Completely opposed |
628 |
42.3% |
0.42346595 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.9% |
0.01888065 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_policy_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion: Dramatically stricter sentences for criminals
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Dramatically stricter sentences for criminals
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
315 |
21.2% |
0.21240728 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
431 |
29.1% |
0.29062711 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
423 |
28.5% |
0.28523264 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
215 |
14.5% |
0.14497640 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
78 |
5.3% |
0.05259609 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.4% |
0.01416049 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_policy_2
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion: Reduce income inequalities in society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reduce income inequalities in society
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
584 |
39.4% |
0.39379636 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
533 |
35.9% |
0.35940661 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
246 |
16.6% |
0.16587997 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
77 |
5.2% |
0.05192178 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
24 |
1.6% |
0.01618341 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.3% |
0.01281187 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_policy_3
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion: Reserve more parental leave days for the father/co-mother
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reserve more parental leave days for the father/co-mother
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
124 |
8.4% |
0.08361430 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
313 |
21.1% |
0.21105866 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
607 |
40.9% |
0.40930546 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
262 |
17.7% |
0.17666891 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
148 |
10.0% |
0.09979771 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
2.0% |
0.01955496 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_policy_4
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion: Work to strengthen private entrepreneurship and the market
economy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Work to strengthen private entrepreneurship and the market economy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
215 |
14.5% |
0.14497640 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
485 |
32.7% |
0.32703978 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
490 |
33.0% |
0.33041133 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
207 |
14.0% |
0.13958193 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
61 |
4.1% |
0.04113284 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.7% |
0.01685772 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_policy_5
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion: Make more space for Christian cultural heritage in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Make more space for Christian cultural heritage in Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
167 |
11.3% |
0.11260958 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
297 |
20.0% |
0.20026972 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
492 |
33.2% |
0.33175995 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
302 |
20.4% |
0.20364127 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
206 |
13.9% |
0.13890762 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.3% |
0.01281187 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_policy_6
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion: Strengthening the State’s control over business and
industry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthening the State’s control over business and industry
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
134 |
9.0% |
0.09035738 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
448 |
30.2% |
0.30209036 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
471 |
31.8% |
0.31759946 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
291 |
19.6% |
0.19622387 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
119 |
8.0% |
0.08024275 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.3% |
0.01348618 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_policy_7
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion: Accept fewer refugees
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Accept fewer refugees
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
197 |
13.3% |
0.13283884 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
203 |
13.7% |
0.13688469 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
468 |
31.6% |
0.31557653 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
400 |
27.0% |
0.26972353 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
193 |
13.0% |
0.13014160 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.5% |
0.01483479 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_policy_8
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion: Increase the carbon tax on petrol and diesel
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase the carbon tax on petrol and diesel
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
202 |
13.6% |
0.13621038 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
375 |
25.3% |
0.25286581 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
301 |
20.3% |
0.20296696 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
308 |
20.8% |
0.20768712 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
276 |
18.6% |
0.18610924 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.4% |
0.01416049 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22memerally_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for r22memerally.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1473] [Invalid:12224]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
explain |
732 |
49.7% |
0.496945 |
| 2 |
preach |
741 |
50.3% |
0.503055 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12224 |
|
NA |
r22memerally_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for r22memerally.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1473] [Invalid:12224]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Islamic values |
693 |
47.0% |
0.4704684 |
| 2 |
conservative notions of women's position in Islam |
780 |
53.0% |
0.5295316 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12224 |
|
NA |
r22memerally
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Muslims have asked for permission to hold a public event
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Norwegian Muslims have asked for permission to hold a public event
to [r22memerally_ran1] [r22memerally_ran2].
|
|
Literal question:
|
How far do you agree or disagree that they should be permitted to hold
such an event?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
211 |
14.2% |
0.14227916 |
| 2 |
Agree |
291 |
19.6% |
0.19622387 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
183 |
12.3% |
0.12339852 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
230 |
15.5% |
0.15509103 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
124 |
8.4% |
0.08361430 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
167 |
11.3% |
0.11260958 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
258 |
17.4% |
0.17397168 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.3% |
0.01281187 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22memerent_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for r22memerent.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1473] [Invalid:12224]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A group of Norwegian Muslims have requested to be able to rent a room in a
public library for a meeting to discuss the right fasting practice during
Ramadan. |
381 |
25.9% |
0.2586558 |
| 2 |
A group of Norwegian Muslims have requested to be able to rent a room in
a public library for a meeting to preach the right fasting practice during
Ramadan. |
375 |
25.5% |
0.2545825 |
| 3 |
A group of Norwegian Muslims have requested to be able to rent a room in
a public library for a meeting to preach conservative Islamic values that
homosexuality is a sin. |
335 |
22.7% |
0.2274270 |
| 4 |
A group of Norwegian Christians have requested to be able to rent a room in
a public library for a meeting to preach conservative Christian values that
homosexuality is a sin. |
382 |
25.9% |
0.2593347 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12224 |
|
NA |
r22memerent
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norwegian Muslims/Christians have requested to rent a
library
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[R22MEMErent_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How far do you agree or disagree that they should be able to rent the
room in the public library for this purpose?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
187 |
12.6% |
0.12609575 |
| 2 |
Agree |
234 |
15.8% |
0.15778827 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
135 |
9.1% |
0.09103169 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
187 |
12.6% |
0.12609575 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
101 |
6.8% |
0.06810519 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
209 |
14.1% |
0.14093055 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
408 |
27.5% |
0.27511800 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.5% |
0.01483479 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_libertarianism_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree or disagree: The authorities should stop telling people how to
live their lives.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should stop telling people how to live their lives.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
275 |
18.5% |
0.18543493 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
541 |
36.5% |
0.36480108 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
546 |
36.8% |
0.36817262 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
90 |
6.1% |
0.06068780 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.1% |
0.02090357 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_libertarianism_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree or disagree: The authorities should do more to ensure that society
achieves its common goals, even if this restricts the individual’s
freedom of choice
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should do more to ensure that society achieves its
common goals, even if this restricts the individual’s freedom of choice
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
128 |
8.6% |
0.08631153 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
736 |
49.6% |
0.49629130 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
430 |
29.0% |
0.28995280 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
165 |
11.1% |
0.11126096 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.6% |
0.01618341 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_handshaking_community_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22MEME_handshaking_community.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1472] [Invalid:12225]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
shake hands |
720 |
48.9% |
0.4891304 |
| 2 |
shake hands with female politicians |
752 |
51.1% |
0.5108696 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12225 |
|
NA |
r22meme_handshaking_community_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22MEME_handshaking_community.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1472] [Invalid:12225]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
741 |
50.3% |
0.5033967 |
| 2 |
Instead, the imams put their hand on their heart to greet them. |
731 |
49.7% |
0.4966033 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12225 |
|
NA |
r22meme_handshaking_community
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Politicians ask that all participants should shake hands
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Displayed on the page prior to the question: The next question is
about how people greet each other. When you respond, ignore the fact
that we have a pandemic that requires infection control measures.]
Some local politicians were invited by a local Muslim community centre
to the annual spring festival. On their arrival, the local politicians
attempted to shake hands to greet their hosts. However, the imams
refused to [R22MEME_handshaking_community_ran1].
[R22MEME_handshaking_community_ran2] After the meeting, some of the
attendees expressed discomfort about the situation, and asked that all
participants should shake hands at the next event.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you support or oppose local politicians making such a
request?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely support |
387 |
26.1% |
0.26095752 |
| 2 |
Slightly support |
303 |
20.4% |
0.20431558 |
| 3 |
Slightly oppose |
389 |
26.2% |
0.26230614 |
| 4 |
Completely oppose |
373 |
25.2% |
0.25151719 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.1% |
0.02090357 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_free_speech_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
R22MEME_free_speech.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1471] [Invalid:12226]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
about Islam |
319 |
21.7% |
0.2168593 |
| 2 |
about immigrants |
259 |
17.6% |
0.1760707 |
| 3 |
about Covid-19 |
308 |
20.9% |
0.2093814 |
| 4 |
about the Covid-19 restrictions |
289 |
19.6% |
0.1964650 |
| 5 |
[blank] |
296 |
20.1% |
0.2012237 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12226 |
|
NA |
r22meme_free_speech
|
Variable label:
|
Free to say what you really mean.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now, we’ll consider freedom of speech.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel free to say what you really mean[R22MEME_free_speech_ran]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1186 |
80.0% |
0.79973028 |
| 2 |
No |
277 |
18.7% |
0.18678355 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.3% |
0.01348618 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_conspiracy_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Politics is ultimately a battle between good and evil.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Politics is ultimately a battle between good and evil.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
38 |
2.6% |
0.02562374 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
188 |
12.7% |
0.12677006 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
398 |
26.8% |
0.26837492 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
289 |
19.5% |
0.19487525 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
540 |
36.4% |
0.36412677 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
2.0% |
0.02022927 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_conspiracy_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Most of what happens in the world is decided by a small,
secret group of powerful people.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Most of what happens in the world is decided by a small, secret group of
powerful people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
59 |
4.0% |
0.03978422 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
181 |
12.2% |
0.12204990 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
202 |
13.6% |
0.13621038 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
208 |
14.0% |
0.14025624 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
805 |
54.3% |
0.54281861 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.9% |
0.01888065 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_conspiracy_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: In national politics, nothing happens randomly.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In national politics, nothing happens randomly.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
113 |
7.6% |
0.07619690 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
474 |
32.0% |
0.31962239 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
428 |
28.9% |
0.28860418 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
350 |
23.6% |
0.23600809 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
89 |
6.0% |
0.06001349 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
2.0% |
0.01955496 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_conspiracy_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Undiscovered patterns and secret activities can be found
everywhere in politics.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Undiscovered patterns and secret activities can be found everywhere in
politics.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
175 |
11.8% |
0.11800405 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
489 |
33.0% |
0.32973702 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
345 |
23.3% |
0.23263655 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
219 |
14.8% |
0.14767363 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
230 |
15.5% |
0.15509103 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.7% |
0.01685772 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_justviolence_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
r22meme_justviolence.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1467] [Invalid:12230]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
fundamental human rights |
509 |
34.7% |
0.3469666 |
| 2 |
the future of the Earth |
474 |
32.3% |
0.3231084 |
| 3 |
core Norwegian values |
484 |
33.0% |
0.3299250 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12230 |
|
NA |
r22meme_justviolence
|
Variable label:
|
Justified to use violence.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think it is justified to use violence when
[R22MEME_justviolence_ran] is(are) at stake?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
57 |
3.8% |
0.03843560 |
| 2 |
To some extent |
198 |
13.4% |
0.13351315 |
| 3 |
To a moderate extent |
209 |
14.1% |
0.14093055 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
368 |
24.8% |
0.24814565 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
620 |
41.8% |
0.41807148 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.1% |
0.02090357 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_christian_identity_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: When people criticise Christians, it feels like a
personal insult.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
When people criticise Christians, it feels like a personal insult.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
42 |
2.8% |
0.02832097 |
| 2 |
Agree |
71 |
4.8% |
0.04787593 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
152 |
10.2% |
0.10249494 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
293 |
19.8% |
0.19757249 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
92 |
6.2% |
0.06203641 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
317 |
21.4% |
0.21375590 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
492 |
33.2% |
0.33175995 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.6% |
0.01618341 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_christian_identity_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I have a lot in common with other Christians.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have a lot in common with other Christians.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
46 |
3.1% |
0.03101821 |
| 2 |
Agree |
160 |
10.8% |
0.10788941 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
291 |
19.6% |
0.19622387 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
428 |
28.9% |
0.28860418 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
132 |
8.9% |
0.08900877 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
198 |
13.4% |
0.13351315 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
201 |
13.6% |
0.13553608 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.8% |
0.01820634 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_christian_identity_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: When I meet someone who is Christian, I feel very
connected to this person.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
When I meet someone who is Christian, I feel very connected to this
person.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
23 |
1.6% |
0.01550910 |
| 2 |
Agree |
50 |
3.4% |
0.03371544 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
98 |
6.6% |
0.06608227 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
423 |
28.5% |
0.28523264 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
108 |
7.3% |
0.07282535 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
322 |
21.7% |
0.21712744 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
432 |
29.1% |
0.29130142 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.8% |
0.01820634 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_christian_identity_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: When people praise Christians, it makes me feel good.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
When people praise Christians, it makes me feel good.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
16 |
1.1% |
0.01078894 |
| 2 |
Agree |
59 |
4.0% |
0.03978422 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
100 |
6.7% |
0.06743088 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
507 |
34.2% |
0.34187458 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
109 |
7.3% |
0.07349966 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
279 |
18.8% |
0.18813216 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
386 |
26.0% |
0.26028321 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.8% |
0.01820634 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_religiosity1
|
Variable label:
|
How religious would you say you are?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Irrespective of whether you belong to a particular religion, how
religious would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not religious at all |
657 |
44.3% |
0.44302090 |
| 2 |
A little religious |
557 |
37.6% |
0.37559002 |
| 3 |
Fairly religious |
123 |
8.3% |
0.08293999 |
| 4 |
Very religious |
90 |
6.1% |
0.06068780 |
| 5 |
Definitely religious |
29 |
2.0% |
0.01955496 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.8% |
0.01820634 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_religiosity2
|
Variable label:
|
Apart from weddings and funerals, how often do you attend church
services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often do
you currently attend church services?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006743088 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
7 |
0.5% |
0.0047201618 |
| 3 |
Once a week |
28 |
1.9% |
0.0188806473 |
| 4 |
At least once a month |
66 |
4.5% |
0.0445043830 |
| 5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
262 |
17.7% |
0.1766689144 |
| 6 |
Less frequently |
359 |
24.2% |
0.2420768712 |
| 7 |
Never |
736 |
49.6% |
0.4962913014 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.6% |
0.0161834120 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_imcp_1
|
Variable label:
|
Well/poorly: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced
towards immigrants.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced towards immigrants.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
386 |
26.0% |
0.26028321 |
| 2 |
Well |
511 |
34.5% |
0.34457181 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
245 |
16.5% |
0.16520566 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
223 |
15.0% |
0.15037087 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
46 |
3.1% |
0.03101821 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
30 |
2.0% |
0.02022927 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
16 |
1.1% |
0.01078894 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.8% |
0.01753203 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_imcp_2
|
Variable label:
|
Well/poorly: I don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
401 |
27.0% |
0.27039784 |
| 2 |
Well |
507 |
34.2% |
0.34187458 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
190 |
12.8% |
0.12811868 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
245 |
16.5% |
0.16520566 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
56 |
3.8% |
0.03776129 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
29 |
2.0% |
0.01955496 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
26 |
1.8% |
0.01753203 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
2.0% |
0.01955496 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_imcp_3
|
Variable label:
|
Well/poorly: I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
108 |
7.3% |
0.07282535 |
| 2 |
Well |
262 |
17.7% |
0.17666891 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
220 |
14.8% |
0.14834794 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
465 |
31.4% |
0.31355361 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
138 |
9.3% |
0.09305462 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
155 |
10.5% |
0.10451787 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
105 |
7.1% |
0.07080243 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
2.0% |
0.02022927 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22meme_imcp_4
|
Variable label:
|
Well/poorly: I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of my
own convictions.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of my own
convictions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
334 |
22.5% |
0.22521915 |
| 2 |
Well |
514 |
34.7% |
0.34659474 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
240 |
16.2% |
0.16183412 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
282 |
19.0% |
0.19015509 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
35 |
2.4% |
0.02360081 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
29 |
2.0% |
0.01955496 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
20 |
1.3% |
0.01348618 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
2.0% |
0.01955496 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12214 |
|
NA |
r22tdr8a
|
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
41 |
3.6% |
0.035652174 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
220 |
19.1% |
0.191304348 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
68 |
5.9% |
0.059130435 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
48 |
4.2% |
0.041739130 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
115 |
10.0% |
0.100000000 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
121 |
10.5% |
0.105217391 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
70 |
6.1% |
0.060869565 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
274 |
23.8% |
0.238260870 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
75 |
6.5% |
0.065217391 |
| 10 |
The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 11 |
Other: |
47 |
4.1% |
0.040869565 |
| 12 |
A joint party list |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004347826 |
| 13 |
A local list |
16 |
1.4% |
0.013913043 |
| 14 |
I would cast a blank vote |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006956522 |
| 15 |
I would not vote |
20 |
1.7% |
0.017391304 |
| 16 |
Not entitled to vote |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002608696 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007826087 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr8a_11_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22tdr8b
|
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if county council elections were to take
place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
42 |
3.7% |
0.036521739 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
220 |
19.1% |
0.191304348 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
68 |
5.9% |
0.059130435 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
47 |
4.1% |
0.040869565 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
121 |
10.5% |
0.105217391 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
119 |
10.3% |
0.103478261 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
63 |
5.5% |
0.054782609 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
252 |
21.9% |
0.219130435 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
78 |
6.8% |
0.067826087 |
| 10 |
The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006956522 |
| 11 |
Other: |
42 |
3.7% |
0.036521739 |
| 12 |
A joint party list |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001739130 |
| 13 |
A local list |
12 |
1.0% |
0.010434783 |
| 14 |
I would cast a blank vote |
16 |
1.4% |
0.013913043 |
| 15 |
I would not vote |
46 |
4.0% |
0.040000000 |
| 16 |
Not entitled to vote |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003478261 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr8b_11_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which party would you vote for if county council elections were
to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22tdr16
|
Variable label:
|
The current economic situation in Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your view on the current economic situation in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
397 |
34.5% |
0.345217391 |
| 2 |
Good |
578 |
50.3% |
0.502608696 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
97 |
8.4% |
0.084347826 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
38 |
3.3% |
0.033043478 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
23 |
2.0% |
0.020000000 |
| 6 |
Bad |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006956522 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005217391 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002608696 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr17
|
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in [region] compared to [region]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation in [region] with the rest of
Norway, do you consider the situation in [region] as better, worse or
the same?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Better |
287 |
25.0% |
0.249565217 |
| 2 |
The same |
682 |
59.3% |
0.593043478 |
| 3 |
Worse |
171 |
14.9% |
0.148695652 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr1_1
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The municipality you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The municipality you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
437 |
38.0% |
0.380000000 |
| 2 |
Connection |
436 |
37.9% |
0.379130435 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
186 |
16.2% |
0.161739130 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
70 |
6.1% |
0.060869565 |
| 5 |
No connection |
12 |
1.0% |
0.010434783 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007826087 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr1_2
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The county you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The county you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
271 |
23.6% |
0.23565217 |
| 2 |
Connection |
389 |
33.8% |
0.33826087 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
226 |
19.7% |
0.19652174 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
168 |
14.6% |
0.14608696 |
| 5 |
No connection |
72 |
6.3% |
0.06260870 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
2.1% |
0.02086957 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr1_3
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
828 |
72.0% |
0.720000000 |
| 2 |
Connection |
238 |
20.7% |
0.206956522 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
51 |
4.4% |
0.044347826 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
11 |
1.0% |
0.009565217 |
| 5 |
No connection |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002608696 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.7% |
0.016521739 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr19
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Economic resources should be transferred from the rich
parts of the country to parts that are not so rich.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Economic resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the
country to parts that are not so rich to ensure that everyone receives
public services of the same quality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
231 |
20.1% |
0.200869565 |
| 2 |
Agree |
422 |
36.7% |
0.366956522 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
307 |
26.7% |
0.266956522 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
108 |
9.4% |
0.093913043 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
47 |
4.1% |
0.040869565 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
18 |
1.6% |
0.015652174 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
1.0% |
0.010434783 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004347826 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_offentlige_tjenester_infotoggle
|
Variable label:
|
Registers if the respondent clicked the infobox.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In recent years, there has been a lot of discussion about merging
municipalities and counties. Politicians and bureaucrats have discussed,
among other things, whether municipalities and counties should be
responsible for providing more or fewer public services. Therefore, we
are interested in knowing which level of governance you think is most
suitable for providing certain services.
[Click here for more information]
For each service, we would like you to indicate the level(s) of
governance you believe should hold the primary responsibility for
offering the service. You can choose between municipal level, county
authority level, national level, or a combination thereof.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[Text displayed if the respondent pressed “Click here for more
information”:]
When assessing which level of governance you believe should offer the
individual services, it can be taken into account that the services must
be effective and that they must satisfy residents’ preferences. One
could believe, for example, that land-use planning should be the
responsibility of the municipality because local authorities know where
residents want new swimming baths and cinemas to be built, thereby
fulfilling residents’ preferences. Other services, such as defence,
should be the responsibility of national authorities – maintenance of
the military and military equipment is very costly and the whole
population wants and needs protection. A third option is that several
levels of governance share responsibility for a service, such as climate
and the environment (good air quality). Air pollution can occur across
governance levels. So it can be claimed that municipalities, counties
and the national authorities should be involved in improving air
quality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Registers if the respondent clicked the infobox.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:227] [Invalid:13470]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The respondent clicked on the infobox |
227 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13470 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of public health: Your
municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Public health: Your municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
370 |
32.2% |
0.321739130 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
770 |
67.0% |
0.669565217 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of public health: Your
county authority
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Public health: Your county authority
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
230 |
20.0% |
0.200000000 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
910 |
79.1% |
0.791304348 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of public health: The
national authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Public health: The national authorities
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
919 |
79.9% |
0.799130435 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
221 |
19.2% |
0.192173913 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of vaccination: Your
municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vaccination: Your municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
683 |
59.4% |
0.593913043 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
457 |
39.7% |
0.397391304 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of vaccination: Your
county authority
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vaccination: Your county authority
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
143 |
12.4% |
0.124347826 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
997 |
86.7% |
0.866956522 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of vaccination: The
national authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vaccination: The national authorities
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
615 |
53.5% |
0.534782609 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
525 |
45.7% |
0.456521739 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of patient transport
(e.g. by ambulance or helicopter): Your municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Patient transport (e.g. by ambulance or helicopter): Your municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
360 |
31.3% |
0.313043478 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
780 |
67.8% |
0.678260870 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of patient transport
(e.g. by ambulance or helicopter): Your county authority
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Patient transport (e.g. by ambulance or helicopter)Your county authority
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
491 |
42.7% |
0.426956522 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
649 |
56.4% |
0.564347826 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of patient transport
(e.g. by ambulance or helicopter): The national authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Patient transport (e.g. by ambulance or helicopter): The national
authorities
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
577 |
50.2% |
0.501739130 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
563 |
49.0% |
0.489565217 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of hospitals: Your
municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hospitals: Your municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
170 |
14.8% |
0.147826087 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
970 |
84.3% |
0.843478261 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of hospitals: Your
county authority
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hospitals: Your county authority
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
440 |
38.3% |
0.382608696 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
700 |
60.9% |
0.608695652 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_4_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of hospitals: The
national authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hospitals: The national authorities
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
818 |
71.1% |
0.711304348 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
322 |
28.0% |
0.280000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of home help service
for the elderly and persons with a functional impairment: Your
municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Home help service for the elderly and persons with a functional
impairment: Your municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
890 |
77.4% |
0.773913043 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
250 |
21.7% |
0.217391304 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of home help service
for the elderly and persons with a functional impairment: Your county
authority
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Home help service for the elderly and persons with a functional
impairment: Your county authority
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
227 |
19.7% |
0.197391304 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
913 |
79.4% |
0.793913043 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_helsetjenester_5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of health services within the area of home help service
for the elderly and persons with a functional impairment: The national
authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which governance level(s) do you believe should hold responsibility for
the following health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Home help service for the elderly and persons with a functional
impairment: The national authorities
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
298 |
25.9% |
0.259130435 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
842 |
73.2% |
0.732173913 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_sosiook_tjenester_1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of services within the area of business policy: Your
municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level(s) of governance do you believe should hold responsibility
for the following services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your municipality: Business policy
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
541 |
47.0% |
0.47043478 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
597 |
51.9% |
0.51913043 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01043478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_sosiook_tjenester_1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of services within the area of business policy: Your
county authority
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level(s) of governance do you believe should hold responsibility
for the following services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your county authority: Business policy
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
427 |
37.1% |
0.37130435 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
711 |
61.8% |
0.61826087 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01043478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_sosiook_tjenester_1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of services within the area of business policy: The
national authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level(s) of governance do you believe should hold responsibility
for the following services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The national authorities: Business policy
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
691 |
60.1% |
0.60086957 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
447 |
38.9% |
0.38869565 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01043478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_sosiook_tjenester_2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of services within the area of regional policy: Your
municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level(s) of governance do you believe should hold responsibility
for the following services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your municipality: Regional policy
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
427 |
37.1% |
0.37130435 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
711 |
61.8% |
0.61826087 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01043478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_sosiook_tjenester_2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of services within the area of regional policy: Your
county authority
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level(s) of governance do you believe should hold responsibility
for the following services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your county authority: Regional policy
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
506 |
44.0% |
0.44000000 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
632 |
55.0% |
0.54956522 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01043478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_sosiook_tjenester_2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of services within the area of regional policy: The
national authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level(s) of governance do you believe should hold responsibility
for the following services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The national authorities: Regional policy
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
647 |
56.3% |
0.56260870 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
491 |
42.7% |
0.42695652 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01043478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_sosiook_tjenester_3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of services within the area of museums: Your municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level(s) of governance do you believe should hold responsibility
for the following services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your municipality: Museums
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
353 |
30.7% |
0.30695652 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
785 |
68.3% |
0.68260870 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01043478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_sosiook_tjenester_3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of services within the area of museums: Your county
authority
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level(s) of governance do you believe should hold responsibility
for the following services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your county authority: Museums
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
488 |
42.4% |
0.42434783 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
650 |
56.5% |
0.56521739 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01043478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_sosiook_tjenester_3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of services within the area of museums: The national
authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level(s) of governance do you believe should hold responsibility
for the following services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The national authorities: Museums
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
643 |
55.9% |
0.55913043 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
495 |
43.0% |
0.43043478 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01043478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_sosiook_tjenester_4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of services within the area of housing policy: Your
municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level(s) of governance do you believe should hold responsibility
for the following services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your municipality: Housing policy
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
746 |
64.9% |
0.64869565 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
392 |
34.1% |
0.34086957 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01043478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_sosiook_tjenester_4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of services within the area of housing policy: Your
county authority
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level(s) of governance do you believe should hold responsibility
for the following services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your county authority: Housing policy
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
257 |
22.3% |
0.22347826 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
881 |
76.6% |
0.76608696 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01043478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_sosiook_tjenester_4_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsibility of services within the area of housing policy: The
national authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level(s) of governance do you believe should hold responsibility
for the following services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The national authorities: Housing policy
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each service, tick your municipality, your county, the national
authorities, or a combination of these levels of governance. You may
tick a service multiple times if you believe that more than one level of
governance should hold responsibility.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
520 |
45.2% |
0.45217391 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
618 |
53.7% |
0.53739130 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01043478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_corona
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or anyone in your household been tested positive for Covid-19?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or anyone in your household been tested positive for Covid-19?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
63 |
5.5% |
0.05478261 |
| 2 |
No |
1071 |
93.1% |
0.93130435 |
| 3 |
No response |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01391304 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12547 |
|
NA |
r22_corona_utvalg
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects (weighted randomisation) sub-group
affiliation (“selection”) that determines which corona questions the
respondents should receive.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 6]
[Weighted randomization. 66% probability for the value 1, 33% for the
value 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1944] [Invalid:11753]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selection 1 (approx. 2/3 of selection frame) |
1281 |
65.9% |
0.6589506 |
| 2 |
Selection 2 (approx. 1/3 of selection frame) |
663 |
34.1% |
0.3410494 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11753 |
|
NA |
r22_psykpr1
|
Variable label:
|
Risk that during the outbreak you will become infected by the
coronavirus.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak you will
become infected by the coronavirus?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very low |
211 |
16.5% |
0.1647150664 |
| 2 |
Somewhat low |
467 |
36.5% |
0.3645589383 |
| 3 |
Medium |
459 |
35.8% |
0.3583138173 |
| 4 |
Somewhat high |
117 |
9.1% |
0.0913348946 |
| 5 |
Very high |
26 |
2.0% |
0.0202966432 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007806401 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12416 |
|
NA |
r22cov_psykc2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: optimistic that I will deal with the challenges I will
face due to the coronavirus.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am optimistic that I will deal with the challenges I will face due to
the coronavirus.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
22 |
1.7% |
0.01717408 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
22 |
1.7% |
0.01717408 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
175 |
13.7% |
0.13661202 |
| 4 |
Agree |
737 |
57.5% |
0.57533177 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
325 |
25.4% |
0.25370804 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12416 |
|
NA |
r22_cov_ferie
|
Variable label:
|
After adhering to the measures, I deserve to do the things that were not
permitted.
|
|
Literal question:
|
After adhering strictly to the measures for a while, I feel that I
deserve to be able to do the things that were not permitted under the
measures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
143 |
11.2% |
0.11163154 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
379 |
29.6% |
0.29586261 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
488 |
38.1% |
0.38095238 |
| 4 |
Agree |
222 |
17.3% |
0.17330211 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
47 |
3.7% |
0.03669009 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.2% |
0.00156128 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12416 |
|
NA |
r22cov_trust_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I have confidence in the way national authorities are
handling and are prepared to tackle the coronavirus pandemic.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have confidence in the way national authorities are handling and are
prepared to tackle the coronavirus pandemic.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
32 |
2.5% |
0.02498048 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
63 |
4.9% |
0.04918033 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
103 |
8.0% |
0.08040593 |
| 4 |
Agree |
747 |
58.3% |
0.58313817 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
336 |
26.2% |
0.26229508 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12416 |
|
NA |
r22cov_trust_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I have confidence in the way my municipality and the
local health services are handling and are prepared to tackle the
coronavirus pandemic.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have confidence in the way my municipality and the local health
services are handling and are prepared to tackle the coronavirus
pandemic.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
31 |
2.4% |
0.0241998439 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
47 |
3.7% |
0.0366900859 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
127 |
9.9% |
0.0991412959 |
| 4 |
Agree |
732 |
57.1% |
0.5714285714 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
343 |
26.8% |
0.2677595628 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007806401 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12416 |
|
NA |
r22cov_vaccine
|
Variable label:
|
I will be (or have been) vaccinated against the coronavirus
|
|
Literal question:
|
I will be (or have been) vaccinated against the coronavirus
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I have been vaccinated (fully vaccinated, two doses) and will take a third
dose if I am offered it |
1139 |
88.9% |
0.889149102 |
| 2 |
Yes, I have been vaccinated (fully vaccinated, two doses), but will not take a
third dose if I am offered it |
87 |
6.8% |
0.067915691 |
| 3 |
Yes, I have been vaccinated (part-vaccinated, one dose) and will take a second
dose |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005464481 |
| 4 |
Yes, I have been vaccinated (part-vaccinated, one dose), but will not take a
second dose |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001561280 |
| 5 |
No, I haven’t been vaccinated, but do intend to be |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003903201 |
| 6 |
No, I haven’t been vaccinated and do not intend to be |
28 |
2.2% |
0.021857923 |
| 7 |
No, I haven’t been vaccinated and cannot be vaccinated for various reasons |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007025761 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003122560 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12416 |
|
NA |
r22cov_psykac1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I do my best to limit infection risks
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I do my best to limit infection risks (washing hands frequently,
avoiding travel and situations involving contact with other people,
keeping a distance and avoiding touching things)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
30 |
2.3% |
0.02341920 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
51 |
4.0% |
0.03981265 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
160 |
12.5% |
0.12490242 |
| 4 |
Agree |
590 |
46.1% |
0.46057767 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
450 |
35.1% |
0.35128806 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12416 |
|
NA |
r22cov_behaviour
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: My behavior during the pandemic has affected the risk of
infection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The way I have behaved during the pandemic has affected the risk of
infection for those around me.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
313 |
24.4% |
0.244340359 |
| 2 |
To a small extent |
363 |
28.3% |
0.283372365 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
206 |
16.1% |
0.160811866 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
294 |
23.0% |
0.229508197 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
95 |
7.4% |
0.074160812 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.8% |
0.007806401 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12416 |
|
NA |
r22cov_next_pandemic1
|
Variable label:
|
Likely or unlikely that we will experience new pandemics.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how likely or unlikely it is that during the next 20
years we will experience new pandemics that are just as serious or more
serious than the coronavirus.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all likely |
9 |
1.4% |
0.013574661 |
| 2 |
Not very likely |
35 |
5.3% |
0.052790347 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
152 |
22.9% |
0.229260935 |
| 4 |
Likely |
314 |
47.4% |
0.473604827 |
| 5 |
Highly likely |
152 |
22.9% |
0.229260935 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001508296 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13034 |
|
NA |
r22cov_next_pandemic2
|
Variable label:
|
If there is a pandemic similar to the coronavirus, I will follow the
infection control advice
|
|
Literal question:
|
If, in a few years, there is a pandemic similar to the coronavirus, I
will do my best to follow all the infection control advice
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a far lesser extent than during the 2020-2021 coronavirus pandemic |
6 |
0.9% |
0.009049774 |
| 2 |
To a somewhat lesser extent than during the 2020-2021 coronavirus pandemic |
9 |
1.4% |
0.013574661 |
| 3 |
Around the same as during the 2020-2021 coronavirus pandemic |
581 |
87.6% |
0.876319759 |
| 4 |
To a somewhat greater extent than during the 2020-2021 coronavirus pandemic |
44 |
6.6% |
0.066365008 |
| 5 |
To a much greater extent than during the 2020-2021 coronavirus pandemic |
22 |
3.3% |
0.033182504 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001508296 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13034 |
|
NA |
r22cov_next_pandemic3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Frustrated by the following measures: … working from home
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If, in a few years, there is a pandemic similar to the coronavirus, I
will be frustrated by the following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
… working from home
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
425 |
64.1% |
0.64102564 |
| 2 |
To a small extent |
136 |
20.5% |
0.20512821 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
64 |
9.7% |
0.09653092 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
17 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
8 |
1.2% |
0.01206637 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
2.0% |
0.01960784 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13034 |
|
NA |
r22cov_next_pandemic3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Frustrated by the following measures: … closed schools and kindergartens
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If, in a few years, there is a pandemic similar to the coronavirus, I
will be frustrated by the following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
… closed schools and kindergartens
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
182 |
27.5% |
0.27450980 |
| 2 |
To a small extent |
176 |
26.5% |
0.26546003 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
164 |
24.7% |
0.24736048 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
91 |
13.7% |
0.13725490 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
39 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.7% |
0.01659125 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13034 |
|
NA |
r22cov_next_pandemic3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Frustrated by the following measures: … requirement to wear a face mask
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If, in a few years, there is a pandemic similar to the coronavirus, I
will be frustrated by the following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
… requirement to wear a face mask
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
452 |
68.2% |
0.681749623 |
| 2 |
To a small extent |
117 |
17.6% |
0.176470588 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
52 |
7.8% |
0.078431373 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
25 |
3.8% |
0.037707391 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
12 |
1.8% |
0.018099548 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.8% |
0.007541478 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13034 |
|
NA |
r22cov_next_pandemic3_4
|
Variable label:
|
Frustrated by the following measures: … restrictions on gathering
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If, in a few years, there is a pandemic similar to the coronavirus, I
will be frustrated by the following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
… restrictions on gathering
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
283 |
42.7% |
0.426847662 |
| 2 |
To a small extent |
196 |
29.6% |
0.295625943 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
133 |
20.1% |
0.200603318 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
33 |
5.0% |
0.049773756 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
14 |
2.1% |
0.021116139 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.6% |
0.006033183 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13034 |
|
NA |
r22cov_next_pandemic3_5
|
Variable label:
|
Frustrated by the following measures: … advice regarding washing hands
and keeping a distance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If, in a few years, there is a pandemic similar to the coronavirus, I
will be frustrated by the following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
… advice regarding washing hands and keeping a distance
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
563 |
84.9% |
0.849170437 |
| 2 |
To a small extent |
64 |
9.7% |
0.096530920 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
14 |
2.1% |
0.021116139 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
13 |
2.0% |
0.019607843 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
6 |
0.9% |
0.009049774 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.5% |
0.004524887 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13034 |
|
NA |
r22cov_next_pandemic3_6
|
Variable label:
|
Frustrated by the following measures: … travel restrictions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If, in a few years, there is a pandemic similar to the coronavirus, I
will be frustrated by the following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
… travel restrictions
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
291 |
43.9% |
0.438914027 |
| 2 |
To a small extent |
185 |
27.9% |
0.279034691 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
139 |
21.0% |
0.209653092 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
31 |
4.7% |
0.046757164 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
16 |
2.4% |
0.024132730 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001508296 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13034 |
|
NA |
r22cov_next_pandemic3_7
|
Variable label:
|
Frustrated by the following measures: … restrictions on opening hours
for shops and restaurants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If, in a few years, there is a pandemic similar to the coronavirus, I
will be frustrated by the following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
… restrictions on opening hours for shops and restaurants
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
251 |
37.9% |
0.378582202 |
| 2 |
To a small extent |
218 |
32.9% |
0.328808446 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
141 |
21.3% |
0.212669683 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
30 |
4.5% |
0.045248869 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
21 |
3.2% |
0.031674208 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.3% |
0.003016591 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13034 |
|
NA |
r22cov_next_pandemic3_8
|
Variable label:
|
Frustrated by the following measures: … imposition of quarantine or
isolation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If, in a few years, there is a pandemic similar to the coronavirus, I
will be frustrated by the following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
… imposition of quarantine or isolation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6 & r22_corona_utvalg = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
297 |
44.8% |
0.447963801 |
| 2 |
To a small extent |
168 |
25.3% |
0.253393665 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
127 |
19.2% |
0.191553544 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
49 |
7.4% |
0.073906486 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
20 |
3.0% |
0.030165913 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.3% |
0.003016591 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13034 |
|
NA |
r22polkomrep2
|
Variable label:
|
Property tax: What should the representatives you voted for choose?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the elected representatives in the municipality in which
you live are discussing property taxes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If this question were to be voted on by the municipal council and only
the two options below applied, what do you think the elected
representatives from the party you voted for in the last municipal
election should choose?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p6per21
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if assigned to ‘restutvalg3’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Maximum legal property tax (7 per mille of the property tax base) |
492 |
40.2% |
0.40228945 |
| 2 |
No property tax |
699 |
57.2% |
0.57154538 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
2.6% |
0.02616517 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12474 |
|
NA |
r22polkomrep3_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for r22polkomrep3.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if assigned to ‘restutvalg3’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1191] [Invalid:12506]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
55% |
597 |
50.1% |
0.5012594 |
| 2 |
95% |
594 |
49.9% |
0.4987406 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12506 |
|
NA |
r22polkomrep3_reverse
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Specifies the opposite value as specified in R22POLCOMREP2
to R22POLCOMREP3.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Takes the opposite value of r22polkomrep2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1191] [Invalid:12506]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Maximum legal property tax (7 per mille of the property tax base) |
698 |
58.6% |
0.5860621 |
| 2 |
No property tax |
493 |
41.4% |
0.4139379 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12506 |
|
NA |
r22polkomrep3
|
Variable label:
|
Property tax: Opinion poll conducted. What should the representatives
you voted for choose?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine once again that the elected representatives in your
municipality are discussing property taxes.
But this time, let’s say that several representative opinion polls were
conducted in the municipality by researchers. They show that
[R22POLKOMREP3_ran] of the municipality’s residents, as well as
[R22POLKOMREP3_ran] of those who voted for the same party as you in the
last municipal election, are in favour of [R22POLKOMREP3_reverse].
|
|
Literal question:
|
If this question were to be voted on by the municipal council and only
the two options below applied, what do you think the elected
representatives from the party you voted for in the last municipal
election should choose?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p6per16
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22polkomrep2 is answered & assigned to ‘restutvalg3’ (see
variable description for r22group)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Maximum legal property tax (7 per mille of the property tax base) |
513 |
41.9% |
0.41946034 |
| 2 |
No property tax |
672 |
54.9% |
0.54946852 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
3.1% |
0.03107114 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12474 |
|
NA |
r22oc5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Paying taxes is a duty
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Paying taxes is a duty
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if assigned to ‘restutvalg3’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
757 |
61.9% |
0.618969747 |
| 2 |
Agree |
361 |
29.5% |
0.295175797 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
48 |
3.9% |
0.039247751 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
16 |
1.3% |
0.013082584 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003270646 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002452984 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
10 |
0.8% |
0.008176615 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
2.0% |
0.019623876 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12474 |
|
NA |
r22oc5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Paying less tax LEGALLY is fine (for example, through
various deductions)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Paying less tax LEGALLY is fine (for example, through various
deductions)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if assigned to ‘restutvalg3’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
323 |
26.4% |
0.26410466 |
| 2 |
Agree |
494 |
40.4% |
0.40392478 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
185 |
15.1% |
0.15126738 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
80 |
6.5% |
0.06541292 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
55 |
4.5% |
0.04497138 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
39 |
3.2% |
0.03188880 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
1.3% |
0.01308258 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.5% |
0.02534751 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12474 |
|
NA |
r22oc5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Tax evasion is fine (for example, by underreporting
income or hiding wealth abroad)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tax evasion is fine (for example, by underreporting income or hiding
wealth abroad)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if assigned to ‘restutvalg3’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
1.1% |
0.011447261 |
| 2 |
Agree |
10 |
0.8% |
0.008176615 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006541292 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
15 |
1.2% |
0.012264922 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
20 |
1.6% |
0.016353230 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
221 |
18.1% |
0.180703189 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
905 |
74.0% |
0.739983647 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
2.5% |
0.024529845 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12474 |
|
NA |
r22oc6_1
|
Variable label:
|
How many: … agree that paying taxes is a duty?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you were to guess, out of 100 people in your municipality how many do
you think …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… agree that paying taxes is a duty?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Enter numbers between 0 and 100, without decimals.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if assigned to ‘restutvalg3’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1142]
[Invalid:12555] [Range:0-100]
|
r22oc6_2
|
Variable label:
|
How many: … pay less tax LEGALLY? (for example, through various
deductions)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you were to guess, out of 100 people in your municipality how many do
you think …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… pay less tax LEGALLY? (for example, through various deductions)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Enter numbers between 0 and 100, without decimals.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if assigned to ‘restutvalg3’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1140]
[Invalid:12557] [Range:0-100]
|
r22oc6_3
|
Variable label:
|
How many: … evade tax? (for example, by underreporting income or hiding
wealth abroad)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you were to guess, out of 100 people in your municipality how many do
you think …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… evade tax? (for example, by underreporting income or hiding wealth
abroad)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Enter numbers between 0 and 100, without decimals.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if assigned to ‘restutvalg3’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1134]
[Invalid:12563] [Range:0-100]
|
r22oc2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects value for r22OC2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if assigned to ‘restutvalg4’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1597] [Invalid:12100]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Mohammed, a 28-year-old man from Oslo, joined IS in 2015 and is currently
in the al-Hol refugee camp in Syria. Now he wants to return to Norway. The
Norwegian government has appointed a committee to advise them on the matter. The
committee has sent two independent psychiatrists to Syria to assess Mohammed.
After a thorough investigation, both conclude that he does not pose a threat to
Norwegian society. According to their report, he sincerely regrets joining IS
and wants to help the Norwegian authorities prevent radicalisation. |
123 |
7.7% |
0.07701941 |
| 2 |
Mohammed, a 28-year-old man from Oslo, joined IS in 2015 and is currently in the
al-Hol refugee camp in Syria. Now he wants to return to Norway. The Norwegian
government has appointed a committee to advise them on the matter. The committee
has sent two independent psychiatrists to Syria to assess Mohammed. After a
thorough investigation, both conclude that he sincerely regrets joining IS and
wants to help the Norwegian authorities prevent radicalisation. |
131 |
8.2% |
0.08202880 |
| 3 |
Mohammed, a 28-year-old man from Oslo, joined IS in 2015 and is currently
in the al-Hol refugee camp in Syria. Now he wants to return to Norway. The
Norwegian government has appointed a committee to advise them on the matter. The
committee has sent two independent psychiatrists to Syria to assess Mohammed.
After a thorough investigation, both conclude that he does not pose a threat to
Norwegian society. |
136 |
8.5% |
0.08515967 |
| 4 |
Mohammed, a 28-year-old man from Oslo, joined IS in 2015 and is currently in the
al-Hol refugee camp in Syria. Now he wants to return to Norway. The Norwegian
government has appointed a committee to advise them on the matter. |
112 |
7.0% |
0.07013150 |
| 5 |
Fatima, a 28-year-old woman from Oslo, joined IS in 2015 and is currently
in the al-Hol refugee camp in Syria. Now she wants to return to Norway. The
Norwegian government has appointed a committee to advise them on the matter.
The committee has sent two independent psychiatrists to Syria to assess Fatima.
After a thorough investigation, both conclude that she does not pose a threat to
Norwegian society. According to their report, she sincerely regrets joining IS
and wants to help the Norwegian authorities prevent radicalisation. |
140 |
8.8% |
0.08766437 |
| 6 |
Fatima, a 28-year-old woman from Oslo, joined IS in 2015 and is currently in the
al-Hol refugee camp in Syria. Now she wants to return to Norway. The Norwegian
government has appointed a committee to advise them on the matter. The committee
has sent two independent psychiatrists to Syria to assess Fatima. After a
thorough investigation, both conclude that she sincerely regrets joining IS and
wants to help the Norwegian authorities prevent radicalisation. |
131 |
8.2% |
0.08202880 |
| 7 |
Fatima, a 28-year-old woman from Oslo, joined IS in 2015 and is currently
in the al-Hol refugee camp in Syria. Now she wants to return to Norway. The
Norwegian government has appointed a committee to advise them on the matter.
The committee has sent two independent psychiatrists to Syria to assess Fatima.
After a thorough investigation, both conclude that she does not pose a threat to
Norwegian society. |
149 |
9.3% |
0.09329994 |
| 8 |
Fatima, a 28-year-old woman from Oslo, joined IS in 2015 and is currently in the
al-Hol refugee camp in Syria. Now she wants to return to Norway. The Norwegian
government has appointed a committee to advise them on the matter. |
144 |
9.0% |
0.09016907 |
| 9 |
Malik is a 6-year-old boy who was born in 2015 in Syria under IS. He is now
in the al-Hol refugee camp in Syria with his Norwegian mother. The Norwegian
government has appointed a committee to advise them on whether Malik should be
brought to Norway. The committee has sent two independent psychiatrists to Syria
to assess Malik. After a thorough investigation, both conclude that he does not
pose a threat to Norwegian society. |
127 |
8.0% |
0.07952411 |
| 10 |
Malik is a 6-year-old boy who was born in 2015 in Syria under IS. He is now
in the al-Hol refugee camp in Syria with his Norwegian mother. The Norwegian
government has appointed a committee to advise them on whether Malik should be
brought to Norway. |
140 |
8.8% |
0.08766437 |
| 11 |
Leila is a 6-year-old girl who was born in Syria in 2015 under IS. She is now
in the al-Hol refugee camp in Syria with her Norwegian mother. The Norwegian
government has appointed a committee to advise them on whether Leila should be
brought to Norway. The committee has sent two independent psychiatrists to Syria
to assess Leila. After a thorough investigation, both conclude that she does not
pose a threat to Norwegian society. |
129 |
8.1% |
0.08077646 |
| 12 |
Leila is a 6-year-old girl who was born in Syria in 2015 under IS. She is now
in the al-Hol refugee camp in Syria with her Norwegian mother. The Norwegian
government has appointed a committee to advise them on whether Leila should be
brought to Norway. |
135 |
8.5% |
0.08453350 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12100 |
|
NA |
r22oc2_navn
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Specifies name from vignette for r22OC2 based on r22OC2_ran.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigns name for r22oc2. Selects 1 if r22oc2_ran = 1|2|3|4; 2 if
r22oc2_ran = 5|6|7|8; 3 if r22oc2_ran = 9|10; 4 if r22oc2_ran = 11|12.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1597] [Invalid:12100]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Mohammed |
502 |
31.4% |
0.3143394 |
| 2 |
Fatima |
564 |
35.3% |
0.3531622 |
| 3 |
Malik |
267 |
16.7% |
0.1671885 |
| 4 |
Leila |
264 |
16.5% |
0.1653100 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12100 |
|
NA |
r22oc2_introtekst
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Specifies the introtext displayed before vignette associated
with r22OC2 based on r22OC2_ran.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigns intro text for r22oc2. Selects 1 if r22oc2_ran =
1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8, otherwise 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1597] [Invalid:12100]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In the next question, you will get a description of a fictive person who
travelled from Norway to Syria to join Islamic State (IS). Now this person wants
to come back to Norway and we would like to know what you think about that. We
are aware that this is a difficult question without a right or wrong answer. |
1066 |
66.8% |
0.6675016 |
| 2 |
In the next question you will get a description of a fictive child who was born
to a Norwegian mother in Islamic State (IS) in Syria. Now the question is about
bringing the child to Norway, and we would like to know what you think about
that. We are aware that this is a difficult question without a right or wrong
answer. |
531 |
33.2% |
0.3324984 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12100 |
|
NA |
r22oc2_debrief
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Specifies the debrief displayed after r22OC4 based on
r22OC2_ran.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigns debrief text for r22oc2. Selects 1 if r22oc2_ran =
1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8, otherwise 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1597] [Invalid:12100]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Thank you so much for sharing your views on these issues. We would like to
emphasise again that the description you received was of a fictive person.
Very few Norwegians travelled to Syria, and the group that has returned is very
small. |
1066 |
66.8% |
0.6675016 |
| 2 |
Thank you so much for sharing your views on these issues. We would like to
emphasise again that the description you received was of a fictive child.
Norwegian children who were born in IS are a very small and extremely vulnerable
group that had no influence on the choices made by their parents. |
531 |
33.2% |
0.3324984 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12100 |
|
NA |
r22oc2
|
Variable label:
|
If you were on the committee, would you recommend that [r22OC2_navn] be
allowed to come to Norway?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Displayed on the page before r22OC2_introtekst:
The next questions are about Syrian travelleres (“Syriafarere”). From
the next page onwards you will no longer be able to navigate
backwards.]
[Displayed on the page before the question: r22OC2_introtekst]
[r22OC2_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were on the committee, would you recommend that [r22OC2_navn] be
allowed to come to Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if assigned to ‘restutvalg4’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Definitely not |
290 |
18.0% |
0.180348259 |
| 2 |
Probably not |
335 |
20.8% |
0.208333333 |
| 3 |
Perhaps |
287 |
17.8% |
0.178482587 |
| 4 |
Probably yes |
432 |
26.9% |
0.268656716 |
| 5 |
Definitely yes |
250 |
15.5% |
0.155472637 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.9% |
0.008706468 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12089 |
|
NA |
r22oc2_open
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Can you explain why you selected [answer given in r22OC2] for the
previous question?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different opinions about whether [r22OC2_navn] should be
allowed to return to Norway, and we want to find out more about people’s
views on this question.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you explain why you selected [answer given in r22OC2] for the
previous question?
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can enter up to 650 characters (including spaces).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22oc2 is answered & assigned to ‘restutvalg4’ (see
variable description for r22group)]
[Respondent is limited to 650 characters. Back button disabled.]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22oc3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I would not be opposed to living in the same
municipality as [22OC2_navn].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think of [r22OC2_navn], to what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I would not be opposed to living in the same municipality as
[22OC2_navn].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if assigned to ‘restutvalg4’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
200 |
12.4% |
0.12437811 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
148 |
9.2% |
0.09203980 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
92 |
5.7% |
0.05721393 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
298 |
18.5% |
0.18532338 |
| 5 |
Somewhat agree |
133 |
8.3% |
0.08271144 |
| 6 |
Agree |
350 |
21.8% |
0.21766169 |
| 7 |
Completely agree |
346 |
21.5% |
0.21517413 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
2.5% |
0.02549751 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12089 |
|
NA |
r22oc3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: [22OC2_navn] deserves to be integrated/reintegrated into
Norwegian society.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think of [r22OC2_navn], to what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
[22OC2_navn] deserves to be [integrated/reintegrated] into Norwegian
society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if assigned to ‘restutvalg4’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
239 |
14.9% |
0.14863184 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
218 |
13.6% |
0.13557214 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
114 |
7.1% |
0.07089552 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
233 |
14.5% |
0.14490050 |
| 5 |
Somewhat agree |
185 |
11.5% |
0.11504975 |
| 6 |
Agree |
291 |
18.1% |
0.18097015 |
| 7 |
Completely agree |
286 |
17.8% |
0.17786070 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2.6% |
0.02611940 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12089 |
|
NA |
r22oc3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: [22OC2_navn] may pose a future risk to public safety in
Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think of [r22OC2_navn], to what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I fear that [22OC2_navn] may pose a future risk to public safety in
Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if assigned to ‘restutvalg4’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
166 |
10.3% |
0.10323383 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
292 |
18.2% |
0.18159204 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
140 |
8.7% |
0.08706468 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
258 |
16.0% |
0.16044776 |
| 5 |
Somewhat agree |
301 |
18.7% |
0.18718905 |
| 6 |
Agree |
221 |
13.7% |
0.13743781 |
| 7 |
Completely agree |
201 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.8% |
0.01803483 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12089 |
|
NA |
r22oc4
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Please write the name of the person described to you earlier:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please write the name of the person described to you earlier:
|
|
Post-question:
|
[Displayed on the page after the question: r22oc4_debrieftekst]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if assigned to ‘restutvalg4’ (see variable description for
r22group)]
[Back button disabled.]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22tdr_lokal_vekst
|
Variable label:
|
Compared to ten years ago, has there been growth or decline in your
local area?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Compared to how it was ten years ago, would you say that there has been
growth or decline in your local area?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Major growth |
183 |
12.9% |
0.128782548 |
| 2 |
Growth |
505 |
35.5% |
0.355383533 |
| 3 |
Some growth |
385 |
27.1% |
0.270935961 |
| 4 |
No difference |
200 |
14.1% |
0.140745954 |
| 5 |
Some decline |
80 |
5.6% |
0.056298381 |
| 6 |
Decline |
30 |
2.1% |
0.021111893 |
| 7 |
Major decline |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007037298 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
2.0% |
0.019704433 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12276 |
|
NA |
r22tdr_lokal_vekst_open
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Can you provide the grounds for your answer to the previous
question:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you provide the grounds for your answer to the previous question:
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can write as much or as little as you want, preferably a few
sentences, or just a few words if you prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22tdr_lokal_vekst is answered & r19group = 3]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22tdr_lokal_vaksine
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More vaccines to areas that had high infection rates
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In Norway, it was decided that more vaccines should be given to areas
with high infection rates over time. This meant that municipalities with
low infection rates received fewer vaccines for a period of time.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How far do you agree or disagree with the decision to give more vaccines
to areas that had high infection rates over time?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
391 |
27.5% |
0.275158339 |
| 2 |
Agree |
506 |
35.6% |
0.356087262 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
247 |
17.4% |
0.173821253 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
89 |
6.3% |
0.062631949 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
86 |
6.1% |
0.060520760 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
64 |
4.5% |
0.045038705 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
24 |
1.7% |
0.016889514 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.0% |
0.009852217 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12276 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop1a
|
Variable label:
|
Good or bad proposal that Norway accepts fewer refugees?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it is a good or bad proposal that Norway accepts fewer
refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6|7 or assigned to ‘restutvalg2’ (see variable
description for r22group)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
286 |
11.4% |
0.11412610 |
| 2 |
Good proposal |
452 |
18.0% |
0.18036712 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
699 |
27.9% |
0.27893057 |
| 4 |
Bad proposal |
767 |
30.6% |
0.30606544 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
271 |
10.8% |
0.10814046 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.2% |
0.01237031 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11191 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop1b
|
Variable label:
|
What percentage of people believe that it is a good proposal to accept
fewer refugees?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, what percentage of the Norwegian people believe that it
is a good proposal for Norway to accept fewer refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6|7 or assigned to ‘restutvalg2’ (see variable
description for r22group)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 % |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001596169 |
| 1 |
10 % |
71 |
2.8% |
0.028332003 |
| 2 |
20 % |
200 |
8.0% |
0.079808460 |
| 3 |
30 % |
388 |
15.5% |
0.154828412 |
| 4 |
40 % |
393 |
15.7% |
0.156823623 |
| 5 |
50 % |
454 |
18.1% |
0.181165204 |
| 6 |
60 % |
469 |
18.7% |
0.187150838 |
| 7 |
70 % |
297 |
11.9% |
0.118515563 |
| 8 |
80 % |
135 |
5.4% |
0.053870710 |
| 9 |
90 % |
44 |
1.8% |
0.017557861 |
| 10 |
100 % |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002394254 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
1.8% |
0.017956903 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11191 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop1c
|
Variable label:
|
What percentage of politicians believe that it is a good proposal to
accept fewer refugees?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, what percentage of politicians believe that it is a
good proposal for Norway to accept fewer refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6|7 or assigned to ‘restutvalg2’ (see variable
description for r22group)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 % |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 1 |
10 % |
179 |
7.1% |
0.071428571 |
| 2 |
20 % |
333 |
13.3% |
0.132881085 |
| 3 |
30 % |
450 |
18.0% |
0.179569034 |
| 4 |
40 % |
453 |
18.1% |
0.180766161 |
| 5 |
50 % |
466 |
18.6% |
0.185953711 |
| 6 |
60 % |
315 |
12.6% |
0.125698324 |
| 7 |
70 % |
159 |
6.3% |
0.063447725 |
| 8 |
80 % |
78 |
3.1% |
0.031125299 |
| 9 |
90 % |
22 |
0.9% |
0.008778931 |
| 10 |
100 % |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001197127 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
1.9% |
0.019154030 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11191 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop2_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selected (with weighted randomisation) whether the
respondent should get R22PADKOM_DEMOPOP2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r16group = 6|7 or assigned to ‘restutvalg2’ (see variable
description for r22group)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2480] [Invalid:11217]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gets R22PADKOM_DEMOPOP2 (75% probability) |
1859 |
75.0% |
0.7495968 |
| 2 |
Does not get R22PADKOM_DEMOPOP2 (25% probability) |
621 |
25.0% |
0.2504032 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11217 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop2_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
r22padkom_demopop2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r16group = 6|7 or assigned to ‘restutvalg2’ (see variable
description for r22group)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1859] [Invalid:11838]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In the autumn of 2019, we measured public opinion on the refugee issue in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel. It turned out that 34% of Norwegian people think it is
a good proposal for Norway to accept fewer refugees. |
614 |
33.0% |
0.3302851 |
| 2 |
We have previously measured politicians’ opinion on the refugee issue in the
Norwegian Representative Panel, which examines Norwegian politicians’ attitudes.
It was shown that 22.5% of Norwegian politicians believe that it is a good
proposal for Norway to accept fewer refugees. |
595 |
32.0% |
0.3200646 |
| 3 |
In the Norwegian Citizen Panel and the Norwegian Representative Panel, we
measured public opinion on the refugee issue. It was seen that 34% of Norwegian
people and 22.5% of Norwegian politicians think it is a good proposal for Norway
to accept fewer refugees. |
650 |
35.0% |
0.3496503 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11838 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop2
|
Variable label:
|
Propotion of the public/politicians that think admitting fewer refugees
is a good proposal: Is this more or fewer than you thought?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[R22PADKOM_DEMOPOP2_ran2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is this more or fewer than you thought?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22padkom_demopop2_ran1 = 1 & r16group = 6|7 or assigned
to ‘restutvalg2’ (see variable description for r22group)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Many more |
35 |
1.9% |
0.018827327 |
| 2 |
Several more |
212 |
11.4% |
0.114039806 |
| 3 |
About as many as I thought |
526 |
28.3% |
0.282947821 |
| 4 |
Fewer |
824 |
44.3% |
0.443249059 |
| 5 |
A lot fewer |
245 |
13.2% |
0.131791286 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.9% |
0.009144701 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11838 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop2a
|
Variable label:
|
Norwegian citizens should have the last word in political decisions via
referendums.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In Norway, Norwegian citizens should have the last word in important
political decisions via referendums.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22group = 3 | r22_padkom_group_filter = 1 |
r22_padkom_group_extra = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
820 |
20.9% |
0.20939734 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
1247 |
31.8% |
0.31843718 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
751 |
19.2% |
0.19177732 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
794 |
20.3% |
0.20275792 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
257 |
6.6% |
0.06562819 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
47 |
1.2% |
0.01200204 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9781 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop2b
|
Variable label:
|
A strong political leader is good for Norway, even if the leader bends
the rules to get things done.
|
|
Literal question:
|
A strong political leader is good for Norway, even if the leader bends
the rules to get things done.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22group = 3 | r22_padkom_group_filter = 1 |
r22_padkom_group_extra = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
135 |
3.4% |
0.03447395 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
660 |
16.9% |
0.16853933 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
600 |
15.3% |
0.15321757 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
1266 |
32.3% |
0.32328907 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
1190 |
30.4% |
0.30388151 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
65 |
1.7% |
0.01659857 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9781 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop2c
|
Variable label:
|
In Norway, the will of the majority should always govern.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In Norway, the will of the majority should always govern, even at the
expense of the rights of minorities.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22group = 3 | r22_padkom_group_filter = 1 |
r22_padkom_group_extra = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
199 |
5.1% |
0.05081716 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
788 |
20.1% |
0.20122574 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
844 |
21.6% |
0.21552605 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
1299 |
33.2% |
0.33171604 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
708 |
18.1% |
0.18079673 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
78 |
2.0% |
0.01991828 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9781 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop2e
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with democracy in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy
works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22group = 3 | r22_padkom_group_filter = 1 |
r22_padkom_group_extra = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Extremely dissatisfied |
28 |
0.7% |
0.007150153 |
| 1 |
1 |
27 |
0.7% |
0.006894791 |
| 2 |
2 |
61 |
1.6% |
0.015577120 |
| 3 |
3 |
112 |
2.9% |
0.028600613 |
| 4 |
4 |
114 |
2.9% |
0.029111338 |
| 5 |
5 |
279 |
7.1% |
0.071246170 |
| 6 |
6 |
351 |
9.0% |
0.089632278 |
| 7 |
7 |
955 |
24.4% |
0.243871297 |
| 8 |
8 |
1321 |
33.7% |
0.337334014 |
| 9 |
9 |
501 |
12.8% |
0.127936670 |
| 10 |
10 - Extremely satisfied |
118 |
3.0% |
0.030132789 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
49 |
1.3% |
0.012512768 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9781 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop3_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects question variant from R22PADKOM_DEMOPOP3.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1948] [Invalid:11749]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selects R22PADKOM_DEMOPOP3a. |
630 |
32.3% |
0.3234086 |
| 2 |
Selects R22PADKOM_DEMOPOP3b. |
646 |
33.2% |
0.3316222 |
| 3 |
Selects R22PADKOM_DEMOPOP3c. |
672 |
34.5% |
0.3449692 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11749 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop3a
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think it might be justified to use violence
against political opponents?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think it might be justified to use violence
against political opponents?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Scroll to the required value
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22padkom_demopop3_ran = 1 & r22group = 3]
[Respondent inputs their answer by use of a slider.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:552] [Invalid:13145]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
396 |
71.7% |
0.717391304 |
| 1 |
|
66 |
12.0% |
0.119565217 |
| 2 |
|
25 |
4.5% |
0.045289855 |
| 3 |
|
27 |
4.9% |
0.048913043 |
| 4 |
|
6 |
1.1% |
0.010869565 |
| 5 |
|
15 |
2.7% |
0.027173913 |
| 6 |
|
7 |
1.3% |
0.012681159 |
| 7 |
|
6 |
1.1% |
0.010869565 |
| 8 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.001811594 |
| 10 |
|
3 |
0.5% |
0.005434783 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13145 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop3b
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think it might be justified to use violence
against political opponents if they actively undermine the will of the
people?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think it might be justified to use violence
against political opponents if they actively undermine the will of the
people?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Scroll to the required value
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22padkom_demopop3_ran = 2 & r22group = 3]
[Respondent inputs their answer by use of a slider.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:585] [Invalid:13112]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
318 |
54.4% |
0.543589744 |
| 1 |
|
95 |
16.2% |
0.162393162 |
| 2 |
|
51 |
8.7% |
0.087179487 |
| 3 |
|
32 |
5.5% |
0.054700855 |
| 4 |
|
8 |
1.4% |
0.013675214 |
| 5 |
|
24 |
4.1% |
0.041025641 |
| 6 |
|
16 |
2.7% |
0.027350427 |
| 7 |
|
17 |
2.9% |
0.029059829 |
| 8 |
|
7 |
1.2% |
0.011965812 |
| 9 |
|
4 |
0.7% |
0.006837607 |
| 10 |
|
13 |
2.2% |
0.022222222 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13112 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop3c
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think it might be justified to use violence
against political opponents if they actively undermine the legal
protection of minorities?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think it might be justified to use violence
against political opponents if they actively undermine the legal
protection of minorities?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Scroll to the required value
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22padkom_demopop3_ran = 3 & r22group = 3]
[Respondent inputs their answer by use of a slider.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:580] [Invalid:13117]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
310 |
53.4% |
0.534482759 |
| 1 |
|
100 |
17.2% |
0.172413793 |
| 2 |
|
45 |
7.8% |
0.077586207 |
| 3 |
|
30 |
5.2% |
0.051724138 |
| 4 |
|
14 |
2.4% |
0.024137931 |
| 5 |
|
33 |
5.7% |
0.056896552 |
| 6 |
|
11 |
1.9% |
0.018965517 |
| 7 |
|
14 |
2.4% |
0.024137931 |
| 8 |
|
13 |
2.2% |
0.022413793 |
| 9 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.001724138 |
| 10 |
|
9 |
1.6% |
0.015517241 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13117 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I feel a rush of energy when other countries are hit by
natural disasters.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel a rush of energy when other countries are hit by natural
disasters.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
1432 |
72.9% |
0.728753181 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
218 |
11.1% |
0.110941476 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
27 |
1.4% |
0.013740458 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
133 |
6.8% |
0.067684478 |
| 5 |
Somewhat agree |
38 |
1.9% |
0.019338422 |
| 6 |
Agree |
22 |
1.1% |
0.011195929 |
| 7 |
Completely agree |
13 |
0.7% |
0.006615776 |
| 8 |
Don’t know |
55 |
2.8% |
0.027989822 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.4% |
0.013740458 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I fantasise that a natural disaster wipes out most of
humanity, so a small group can start all over again.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I fantasise that a natural disaster wipes out most of humanity, so a
small group can start all over again.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
1645 |
83.7% |
0.837150127 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
136 |
6.9% |
0.069211196 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
31 |
1.6% |
0.015776081 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
2.2% |
0.021882952 |
| 5 |
Somewhat agree |
46 |
2.3% |
0.023409669 |
| 6 |
Agree |
13 |
0.7% |
0.006615776 |
| 7 |
Completely agree |
11 |
0.6% |
0.005597964 |
| 8 |
Don’t know |
15 |
0.8% |
0.007633588 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.3% |
0.012722646 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I think society should be burned to the ground.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I think society should be burned to the ground.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
1799 |
91.6% |
0.915521628 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
90 |
4.6% |
0.045801527 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
11 |
0.6% |
0.005597964 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
20 |
1.0% |
0.010178117 |
| 5 |
Somewhat agree |
8 |
0.4% |
0.004071247 |
| 6 |
Agree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001526718 |
| 7 |
Completely agree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001526718 |
| 8 |
Don’t know |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003053435 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.3% |
0.012722646 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: When I think of our political and social institutions, I
can’t help thinking: “They should all be burned.”
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
When I think of our political and social institutions, I can’t help
thinking: “They should all be burned.”
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
1741 |
88.6% |
0.886005089 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
114 |
5.8% |
0.058015267 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
22 |
1.1% |
0.011195929 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
26 |
1.3% |
0.013231552 |
| 5 |
Somewhat agree |
12 |
0.6% |
0.006106870 |
| 6 |
Agree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001526718 |
| 7 |
Completely agree |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002544529 |
| 8 |
Don’t know |
11 |
0.6% |
0.005597964 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.6% |
0.015776081 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: We cannot fix the problems in our social institutions.
We should tear them down and start over.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We cannot fix the problems in our social institutions. We should tear
them down and start over.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
1473 |
75.0% |
0.749618321 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
260 |
13.2% |
0.132315522 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
73 |
3.7% |
0.037150127 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
54 |
2.7% |
0.027480916 |
| 5 |
Somewhat agree |
40 |
2.0% |
0.020356234 |
| 6 |
Agree |
11 |
0.6% |
0.005597964 |
| 7 |
Completely agree |
9 |
0.5% |
0.004580153 |
| 8 |
Don’t know |
13 |
0.7% |
0.006615776 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.6% |
0.016284987 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I need chaos around me. It’s too boring if nothing
happens.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I need chaos around me. It’s too boring if nothing happens.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
1551 |
78.9% |
0.789312977 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
239 |
12.2% |
0.121628499 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
62 |
3.2% |
0.031552163 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
38 |
1.9% |
0.019338422 |
| 5 |
Somewhat agree |
27 |
1.4% |
0.013740458 |
| 6 |
Agree |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002544529 |
| 7 |
Completely agree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001526718 |
| 8 |
Don’t know |
9 |
0.5% |
0.004580153 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.6% |
0.015776081 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Sometimes I just want to ruin nice things.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes I just want to ruin nice things.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
1716 |
87.3% |
0.873282443 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
130 |
6.6% |
0.066157761 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
30 |
1.5% |
0.015267176 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
21 |
1.1% |
0.010687023 |
| 5 |
Somewhat agree |
19 |
1.0% |
0.009669211 |
| 6 |
Agree |
9 |
0.5% |
0.004580153 |
| 7 |
Completely agree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001526718 |
| 8 |
Don’t know |
7 |
0.4% |
0.003562341 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.5% |
0.015267176 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_demopop6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: There is no right and wrong in the world.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
There is no right and wrong in the world.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
1317 |
67.0% |
0.670229008 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
279 |
14.2% |
0.141984733 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
110 |
5.6% |
0.055979644 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
129 |
6.6% |
0.065648855 |
| 5 |
Somewhat agree |
45 |
2.3% |
0.022900763 |
| 6 |
Agree |
22 |
1.1% |
0.011195929 |
| 7 |
Completely agree |
20 |
1.0% |
0.010178117 |
| 8 |
Don’t know |
13 |
0.7% |
0.006615776 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.5% |
0.015267176 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11732 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_innvandring_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects question variant from
R22PADKOM_innvandring.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 2]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1928] [Invalid:11769]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selects R22PADKOM_innvandring_a |
943 |
48.9% |
0.4891079 |
| 2 |
Selects R22PADKOM_innvandring_b |
985 |
51.1% |
0.5108921 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11769 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_innvandring_a1
|
Variable label:
|
Citizen’s salary/basic income in Norway: Good or bad proposal
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Displayed on the page before the question: Finally, we want to ask you
some questions about basic income. From the next page onwards it will
not be possible to navigate backwards.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think of a proposal to introduce a citizen’s salary/basic
income in Norway, so that the state automatically pays a fixed amount
each month to all adults living in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22padkom_innvandring_ran = 1 & r22group = 2]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
83 |
8.8% |
0.08801697 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
273 |
29.0% |
0.28950159 |
| 3 |
Fairly bad proposal |
361 |
38.3% |
0.38282078 |
| 4 |
Very bad proposal |
214 |
22.7% |
0.22693531 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.3% |
0.01272534 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12754 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_innvandring_a2
|
Variable label:
|
Citizen’s salary/basic income in Norway: How high should the monthly
payments be?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If a citizen’s salary/basic income were to be introduced in Norway,
approximately how high should the monthly payments be?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Enter a number between 0 and 99, with no decimal places. (in thousand
Norwegian kroner)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22padkom_innvandring_ran = 1 & r22group = 2]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:821] [Invalid:12876]
[Range:0-99]
|
r22padkom_innvandring_a3
|
Variable label:
|
Citizen’s salary/basic income in Norway: Would you be in favour of such
a scheme if it was also to include immigrants with a short period of
residence in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you be in favour of such a scheme if it was also to include
immigrants with a short period of residence in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22padkom_innvandring_ran = 1 &
r22padkom_innvandring_a1 = 1,2) & r22group = 2]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
136 |
38.2% |
0.3820225 |
| 2 |
No |
104 |
29.2% |
0.2921348 |
| 3 |
Don’t know |
116 |
32.6% |
0.3258427 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13341 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_innvandring_a4
|
Variable label:
|
Citizen’s salary/basic income in Norway: Would you be against if
immigrants with a short period of residence were kept out of the scheme?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you also be against such a scheme if immigrants with a short
period of residence in Norway were kept out of the scheme?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22padkom_innvandring_ran = 1 &
r22padkom_innvandring_a1 = 3,4) & r22group = 2]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
387 |
67.3% |
0.673043478 |
| 2 |
No |
70 |
12.2% |
0.121739130 |
| 3 |
Don’t know |
116 |
20.2% |
0.201739130 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.3% |
0.003478261 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13122 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_innvandring_b1
|
Variable label:
|
Citizen’s salary/basic income in Norway: Good or bad proposal
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Displayed on the page before the question: Finally, we want to ask you
some questions about basic income. From the next page onwards it will
not be possible to navigate backwards.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think of a proposal to introduce a citizen’s salary/basic
income in Norway, so that the state automatically pays a fixed amount
each month to all adults living in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22padkom_innvandring_ran = 2 & r22group = 2]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
98 |
9.9% |
0.099492386 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
273 |
27.7% |
0.277157360 |
| 3 |
Fairly bad proposal |
380 |
38.6% |
0.385786802 |
| 4 |
Very bad proposal |
228 |
23.1% |
0.231472081 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.6% |
0.006091371 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12712 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_innvandring_b2
|
Variable label:
|
Citizen’s salary/basic income in Norway: Would you be in favour of such
a scheme if it was also to include immigrants with a short period of
residence in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you be in favour of such a scheme if it was also to include
immigrants with a short period of residence in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22padkom_innvandring_ran = 2 &
r22padkom_innvandring_b1 = 1,2) & r22group = 2]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
157 |
42.3% |
0.423180593 |
| 2 |
No |
109 |
29.4% |
0.293800539 |
| 3 |
Don’t know |
104 |
28.0% |
0.280323450 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.3% |
0.002695418 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13326 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_innvandring_b3
|
Variable label:
|
Citizen’s salary/basic income in Norway: Would you be against if
immigrants with a short period of residence were kept out of the scheme?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you also be against such a scheme if immigrants with a short
period of residence in Norway were kept out of the scheme?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22padkom_innvandring_ran = 2 &
r22padkom_innvandring_b1 = 3,4) & r22group = 2]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
442 |
72.7% |
0.726973684 |
| 2 |
No |
66 |
10.9% |
0.108552632 |
| 3 |
Don’t know |
99 |
16.3% |
0.162828947 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001644737 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13089 |
|
NA |
r22padkom_innvandring_b4
|
Variable label:
|
Citizen’s salary/basic income in Norway: How high should the monthly
payments be?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If a citizen’s salary/basic income were to be introduced in Norway,
approximately how high should the monthly payments be?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Enter a number between 0 and 99, with no decimal places. (in thousand
Norwegian kroner)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22padkom_innvandring_ran = 2 & r22group = 2]
[Back button disabled.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:833] [Invalid:12864]
[Range:0-99]
|
r22km_saneclim1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selectstext piping alternative for r22km_saneclim1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1900] [Invalid:11797]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
608 |
32.0% |
0.32 |
| 2 |
According to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, renewable energy
sources (such as wind energy or hydropower) alone will not be able to produce
enough low-carbon energy to meet emission targets. |
627 |
33.0% |
0.33 |
| 3 |
According to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, nuclear power is
a reliable and inexpensive low-emission energy source. |
665 |
35.0% |
0.35 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11797 |
|
NA |
r22km_saneclim1_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selectstext piping alternative for r22km_saneclim1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1900] [Invalid:11797]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
681 |
35.8% |
0.3584211 |
| 2 |
With today's nuclear reactors (generation III+), nuclear power
^f('r22KM_SaneClim1_ran2_pipe1')^is one of the safest energy sources in the
world. |
633 |
33.3% |
0.3331579 |
| 3 |
The amount of radioactive waste generated from nuclear power is
^f('r22KM_SaneClim1_ran2_pipe1')^very small, and methods have been developed for
safe disposal of waste. |
586 |
30.8% |
0.3084211 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11797 |
|
NA |
r22km_saneclim1_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selectstext piping alternative for r22km_saneclim1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1900] [Invalid:11797]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
648 |
34.1% |
0.3410526 |
| 2 |
[r22KM_SaneClim1_ran3_pipe1] increase dramatically when heavy industry is
decarbonised. Nuclear power can produce large amounts of low-carbon electricity. |
630 |
33.2% |
0.3315789 |
| 3 |
[r22KM_SaneClim1_ran3_pipe2] is increasingly seen as an important part of future
energy systems. Nuclear power can be used to produce pure hydrogen and thereby
meet the increasing demand for this fuel. |
622 |
32.7% |
0.3273684 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11797 |
|
NA |
r22km_saneclim1_ran2_pipe1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Text piping for r22KM_SaneClim1_ran2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigns text substitution for r22km_saneclim1. Assigns 2 if
r22km_saneclim1_ran1 != 1, otherwise 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1900] [Invalid:11797]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
608 |
32.0% |
0.32 |
| 2 |
furthermore, |
1292 |
68.0% |
0.68 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11797 |
|
NA |
r22km_saneclim1_ran3_pipe1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Select text piping for first alternative (electrification)
in r22km_saneclim1_ran3, dependant on the values selected in
r22km_saneclim1_ran1 and r22km_saneclim1_ran2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigns text substitution for r22km_saneclim1. Selects 1 if
(r22km_saneclim1_ran1 != 1 & r22km_saneclim1_ran2 = 1) or
(r22km_saneclim1_ran1 = 1 & r22km_saneclim1_ran2 != 1). Selects 2 if
r22km_saneclim1_ran1 != 1 & r22km_saneclim1_ran2 != 1. Selects 3 if
r22km_saneclim1_ran1 = 1 & r22km_saneclim1_ran2 = 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1900] [Invalid:11797]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Moreover, the power requirement will |
847 |
44.6% |
0.4457895 |
| 2 |
In addition, the power requirement |
832 |
43.8% |
0.4378947 |
| 3 |
The power requirement will |
221 |
11.6% |
0.1163158 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11797 |
|
NA |
r22km_saneclim1_ran3_pipe2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Select text piping for second alternative (hydrogen) in
r22km_saneclim1_ran3, dependant on the values selected in
r22km_saneclim1_ran1 and r22km_saneclim1_ran2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigns text substitution for r22km_saneclim1. Selects 1 if
(r22km_saneclim1_ran1 != 1 & r22km_saneclim1_ran2 = 1) or
(r22km_saneclim1_ran1 = 1 & r22km_saneclim1_ran2 != 1). Selects 2 if
r22km_saneclim1_ran1 != 1 & r22km_saneclim1_ran2 != 1. Selects 3 if
r22km_saneclim1_ran1 = 1 & r22km_saneclim1_ran2 = 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1900] [Invalid:11797]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hydrogen is also |
847 |
44.6% |
0.4457895 |
| 2 |
In addition, hydrogen |
832 |
43.8% |
0.4378947 |
| 3 |
Hydrogen is |
221 |
11.6% |
0.1163158 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11797 |
|
NA |
r22km_saneclim1_qpipe
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Assign text piping for r22km_saneclim1, dependant on values
selected in r22km_saneclim1_ran1, r22km_saneclim1_ran2, and
r22km_saneclim1_ran3.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigns text substitution for r22km_saneclim1. Selects 1 if
r22km_saneclim1_ran1 != 1 or r22km_saneclim1_ran2 != 1 or
r22km_saneclim1_ran3 != 1. Selects 2 if r22km_saneclim1_ran1 = 1 and
r22km_saneclim1_ran2 = 1 and r22km_saneclim1_ran3 = 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1900] [Invalid:11797]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Based on this information, where |
1807 |
95.1% |
0.95105263 |
| 2 |
Where |
93 |
4.9% |
0.04894737 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11797 |
|
NA |
r22km_saneclim1
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Nuclear power in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[r22KM_SaneClim1_ran1]
[r22KM_SaneClim1_ran2]
[r22KM_SaneClim1_ran3]
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r22KM_SaneClim1_qPipe] do you strongly support or oppose that Norway
should invest in nuclear power?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
201 |
10.5% |
0.10452418 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
286 |
14.9% |
0.14872595 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
492 |
25.6% |
0.25585023 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
330 |
17.2% |
0.17160686 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
207 |
10.8% |
0.10764431 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
235 |
12.2% |
0.12220489 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
141 |
7.3% |
0.07332293 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.6% |
0.01612064 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
r22pk15
|
Variable label:
|
Can most people be trusted, or one cannot be careful enough?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
65 |
2.0% |
0.020180068 |
| 1 |
1 |
38 |
1.2% |
0.011797578 |
| 2 |
2 |
69 |
2.1% |
0.021421919 |
| 3 |
3 |
122 |
3.8% |
0.037876436 |
| 4 |
4 |
169 |
5.2% |
0.052468178 |
| 5 |
5 |
314 |
9.7% |
0.097485253 |
| 6 |
6 |
306 |
9.5% |
0.095001552 |
| 7 |
7 |
634 |
19.7% |
0.196833282 |
| 8 |
8 |
772 |
24.0% |
0.239677119 |
| 9 |
9 |
344 |
10.7% |
0.106799131 |
| 10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
379 |
11.8% |
0.117665321 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.3% |
0.002794163 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk12
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
280 |
8.7% |
0.086929525 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
1560 |
48.4% |
0.484321639 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
996 |
30.9% |
0.309220739 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
310 |
9.6% |
0.096243403 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
62 |
1.9% |
0.019248681 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.4% |
0.004036014 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk53
|
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
104 |
3.2% |
0.032288109 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
1246 |
38.7% |
0.386836386 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
1315 |
40.8% |
0.408258305 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
453 |
14.1% |
0.140639553 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
82 |
2.5% |
0.025457932 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.7% |
0.006519714 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk54
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
253 |
7.9% |
0.078547035 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
1346 |
41.8% |
0.417882645 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
1182 |
36.7% |
0.366966781 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
323 |
10.0% |
0.100279416 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
97 |
3.0% |
0.030114871 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.6% |
0.006209252 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pktilfreds4
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with democracy in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
794 |
24.7% |
0.246507296 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
1685 |
52.3% |
0.523129463 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
531 |
16.5% |
0.164855635 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
148 |
4.6% |
0.045948463 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
48 |
1.5% |
0.014902204 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.5% |
0.004656939 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pktilfreds3
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
160 |
5.0% |
0.04967401 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
1284 |
39.9% |
0.39863396 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
1175 |
36.5% |
0.36479354 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
458 |
14.2% |
0.14219187 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
110 |
3.4% |
0.03415088 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
1.1% |
0.01055573 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pktilfreds1
|
Variable label:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
1122 |
34.8% |
0.348339025 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
1657 |
51.4% |
0.514436510 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
312 |
9.7% |
0.096864328 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
98 |
3.0% |
0.030425334 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
19 |
0.6% |
0.005898789 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.4% |
0.004036014 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The most important political issues for you personally (1)
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22pk9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The second most important political issues for you personally (2)
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22pk9_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The third most important political issues for you personally (3)
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22pk6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Christian Democrats
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
527 |
16.4% |
0.163613785 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
602 |
18.7% |
0.186898479 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
647 |
20.1% |
0.200869295 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
706 |
21.9% |
0.219186588 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
400 |
12.4% |
0.124185036 |
| 6 |
Really like |
157 |
4.9% |
0.048742627 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
30 |
0.9% |
0.009313878 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
152 |
4.7% |
0.047190314 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
143 |
4.4% |
0.04439615 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
347 |
10.8% |
0.10773052 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
559 |
17.4% |
0.17354859 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
481 |
14.9% |
0.14933251 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
730 |
22.7% |
0.22663769 |
| 6 |
Really like |
607 |
18.8% |
0.18845079 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
199 |
6.2% |
0.06178206 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
155 |
4.8% |
0.04812170 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
904 |
28.1% |
0.28065818 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
566 |
17.6% |
0.17572183 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
457 |
14.2% |
0.14188140 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
345 |
10.7% |
0.10710959 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
463 |
14.4% |
0.14374418 |
| 6 |
Really like |
243 |
7.5% |
0.07544241 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
92 |
2.9% |
0.02856256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
151 |
4.7% |
0.04687985 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
167 |
5.2% |
0.05184725 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
298 |
9.3% |
0.09251785 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
600 |
18.6% |
0.18627755 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
960 |
29.8% |
0.29804409 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
696 |
21.6% |
0.21608196 |
| 6 |
Really like |
274 |
8.5% |
0.08506675 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
70 |
2.2% |
0.02173238 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
156 |
4.8% |
0.04843216 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
304 |
9.4% |
0.09438063 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
405 |
12.6% |
0.12573735 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
469 |
14.6% |
0.14560695 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
652 |
20.2% |
0.20242161 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
600 |
18.6% |
0.18627755 |
| 6 |
Really like |
434 |
13.5% |
0.13474076 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
206 |
6.4% |
0.06395529 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
151 |
4.7% |
0.04687985 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
139 |
4.3% |
0.04315430 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
256 |
7.9% |
0.07947842 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
538 |
16.7% |
0.16702887 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
794 |
24.7% |
0.24650730 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
790 |
24.5% |
0.24526545 |
| 6 |
Really like |
444 |
13.8% |
0.13784539 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
100 |
3.1% |
0.03104626 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
160 |
5.0% |
0.04967401 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
658 |
20.4% |
0.20428438 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
460 |
14.3% |
0.14281279 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
471 |
14.6% |
0.14622788 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
438 |
13.6% |
0.13598261 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
615 |
19.1% |
0.19093449 |
| 6 |
Really like |
312 |
9.7% |
0.09686433 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
120 |
3.7% |
0.03725551 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
147 |
4.6% |
0.04563800 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
67 |
2.1% |
0.02080099 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
136 |
4.2% |
0.04222291 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
427 |
13.3% |
0.13256753 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
505 |
15.7% |
0.15678361 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
977 |
30.3% |
0.30332195 |
| 6 |
Really like |
806 |
25.0% |
0.25023285 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
159 |
4.9% |
0.04936355 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
144 |
4.5% |
0.04470661 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
515 |
16.0% |
0.15988823 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
429 |
13.3% |
0.13318845 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
439 |
13.6% |
0.13629308 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
606 |
18.8% |
0.18814033 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
595 |
18.5% |
0.18472524 |
| 6 |
Really like |
321 |
10.0% |
0.09965849 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
156 |
4.8% |
0.04843216 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
160 |
5.0% |
0.04967401 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk8
|
Variable label:
|
0-10: Place yourself on left/right scale.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right
wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left
politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Left wing |
126 |
3.9% |
0.03911829 |
| 1 |
1 |
153 |
4.8% |
0.04750078 |
| 2 |
2 |
331 |
10.3% |
0.10276312 |
| 3 |
3 |
410 |
12.7% |
0.12728966 |
| 4 |
4 |
352 |
10.9% |
0.10928283 |
| 5 |
5 |
528 |
16.4% |
0.16392425 |
| 6 |
6 |
312 |
9.7% |
0.09686433 |
| 7 |
7 |
393 |
12.2% |
0.12201180 |
| 8 |
8 |
300 |
9.3% |
0.09313878 |
| 9 |
9 |
109 |
3.4% |
0.03384042 |
| 10 |
10 - Right wing |
86 |
2.7% |
0.02669978 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
121 |
3.8% |
0.03756597 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk10
|
Variable label:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
950 |
29.5% |
0.294939460 |
| 2 |
Good |
1416 |
44.0% |
0.439615026 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
428 |
13.3% |
0.132877988 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
148 |
4.6% |
0.045948463 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
108 |
3.4% |
0.033529960 |
| 6 |
Bad |
55 |
1.7% |
0.017075442 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
15 |
0.5% |
0.004656939 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
101 |
3.1% |
0.031356722 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pkdv5
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage or disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
164 |
5.1% |
0.05091586 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
634 |
19.7% |
0.19683328 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
1125 |
34.9% |
0.34927041 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
469 |
14.6% |
0.14560695 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
491 |
15.2% |
0.15243713 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
143 |
4.4% |
0.04439615 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
95 |
2.9% |
0.02949395 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
100 |
3.1% |
0.03104626 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pk1
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
387 |
12.0% |
0.12014902 |
| 2 |
Interested |
1245 |
38.7% |
0.38652592 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
1024 |
31.8% |
0.31791369 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
386 |
12.0% |
0.11983856 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
78 |
2.4% |
0.02421608 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
101 |
3.1% |
0.03135672 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_1
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her]
parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be
obedient.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
354 |
11.0% |
0.10990376 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
772 |
24.0% |
0.23967712 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
1072 |
33.3% |
0.33281590 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
529 |
16.4% |
0.16423471 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
250 |
7.8% |
0.07761565 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
108 |
3.4% |
0.03352996 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
136 |
4.2% |
0.04222291 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_2
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do
what [his/her] religion requires.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
81 |
2.5% |
0.02514747 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
113 |
3.5% |
0.03508227 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
258 |
8.0% |
0.08009935 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
373 |
11.6% |
0.11580255 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
635 |
19.7% |
0.19714374 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
1635 |
50.8% |
0.50760633 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
126 |
3.9% |
0.03911829 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_3
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her].
[He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
770 |
23.9% |
0.239056194 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
1157 |
35.9% |
0.359205216 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
972 |
30.2% |
0.301769637 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
153 |
4.8% |
0.047500776 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
28 |
0.9% |
0.008692952 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
8 |
0.2% |
0.002483701 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
133 |
4.1% |
0.041291524 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_4
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated
equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in
life.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
960 |
29.8% |
0.298044086 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
1075 |
33.4% |
0.333747283 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
774 |
24.0% |
0.240298044 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
192 |
6.0% |
0.059608817 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
58 |
1.8% |
0.018006830 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
30 |
0.9% |
0.009313878 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
132 |
4.1% |
0.040981062 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_5
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand
things
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She]
likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
677 |
21.0% |
0.210183173 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
1030 |
32.0% |
0.319776467 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
1030 |
32.0% |
0.319776467 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
282 |
8.8% |
0.087550450 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
51 |
1.6% |
0.015833592 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
16 |
0.5% |
0.004967401 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
135 |
4.2% |
0.041912450 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_6
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new
experiences.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
108 |
3.4% |
0.03352996 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
286 |
8.9% |
0.08879230 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
841 |
26.1% |
0.26109904 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
999 |
31.0% |
0.31015213 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
581 |
18.0% |
0.18037876 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
271 |
8.4% |
0.08413536 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
135 |
4.2% |
0.04191245 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_7
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for
[him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
193 |
6.0% |
0.05991928 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
480 |
14.9% |
0.14902204 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
1108 |
34.4% |
0.34399255 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
845 |
26.2% |
0.26234089 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
357 |
11.1% |
0.11083514 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
109 |
3.4% |
0.03384042 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
129 |
4.0% |
0.04004967 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_8
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress
other people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
127 |
3.9% |
0.03942875 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
323 |
10.0% |
0.10027942 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
811 |
25.2% |
0.25178516 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
970 |
30.1% |
0.30114871 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
548 |
17.0% |
0.17013350 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
311 |
9.7% |
0.09655387 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
131 |
4.1% |
0.04067060 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_9
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to
do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
36 |
1.1% |
0.01117665 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
183 |
5.7% |
0.05681465 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
746 |
23.2% |
0.23160509 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
973 |
30.2% |
0.30208010 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
767 |
23.8% |
0.23812481 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
385 |
12.0% |
0.11952810 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
131 |
4.1% |
0.04067060 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_10
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She]
really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
541 |
16.8% |
0.16796026 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
921 |
28.6% |
0.28593604 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
985 |
30.6% |
0.30580565 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
440 |
13.7% |
0.13660354 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
168 |
5.2% |
0.05215771 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
40 |
1.2% |
0.01241850 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
126 |
3.9% |
0.03911829 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22padkom10_articles
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment: List of articles shown
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight
fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles,
one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of four groups,
varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment
articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the
respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and
could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the
experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next
question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they
wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news
on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news
items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online
newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally
would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the
articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two
minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles
carefully before the time runs out.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Variable shows the list of the eight articles that were displayed, comma
separated.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:3115] [Invalid:10582]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkom10_position
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment: Article display order
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight
fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles,
one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of four groups,
varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment
articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the
respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and
could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the
experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next
question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they
wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news
on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news
items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online
newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally
would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the
articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two
minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles
carefully before the time runs out.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Variable shows the order the articles were displayed, comma separated
for the eight articles.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:3115] [Invalid:10582]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkom10_time_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 1: Time spent reading articles
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight
fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles,
one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of four groups,
varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment
articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the
respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and
could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the
experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next
question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they
wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news
on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news
items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online
newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally
would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the
articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two
minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles
carefully before the time runs out.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Variable shows the read time in milliseconds, comma separated for the
eight articles.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:3031] [Invalid:10666]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkom10_time_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 2: Time spent reading articles
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight
fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles,
one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of four groups,
varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment
articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the
respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and
could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the
experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next
question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they
wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news
on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news
items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online
newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally
would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the
articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two
minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles
carefully before the time runs out.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Variable shows the read time in milliseconds, comma separated for the
eight articles.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:292] [Invalid:13405]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkom10_time_3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 3: Time spent reading articles
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight
fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles,
one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of four groups,
varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment
articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the
respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and
could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the
experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next
question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they
wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news
on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news
items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online
newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally
would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the
articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two
minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles
carefully before the time runs out.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Variable shows the read time in milliseconds, comma separated for the
eight articles.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:45] [Invalid:13652]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkom10_time_fp_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 1: Time spent on front page
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight
fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles,
one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of four groups,
varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment
articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the
respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and
could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the
experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next
question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they
wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news
on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news
items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online
newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally
would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the
articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two
minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles
carefully before the time runs out.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Variable shows the time (in milliseconds) spent on the front page.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:character] [Valid:3031] [Invalid:10666]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkom10_time_fp_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 2: Time spent on front page
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight
fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles,
one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of four groups,
varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment
articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the
respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and
could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the
experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next
question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they
wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news
on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news
items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online
newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally
would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the
articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two
minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles
carefully before the time runs out.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Variable shows the time (in milliseconds) spent on the front page.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:character] [Valid:292] [Invalid:13405]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkom10_time_fp_3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 3: Time spent on front page
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight
fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles,
one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of four groups,
varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment
articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the
respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and
could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the
experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next
question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they
wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news
on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news
items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online
newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally
would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the
articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two
minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles
carefully before the time runs out.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Variable shows the time (in milliseconds) spent on the front page.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:character] [Valid:45] [Invalid:13652]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkom10_click_order_session_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 1: Article click order
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight
fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles,
one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of four groups,
varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment
articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the
respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and
could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the
experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next
question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they
wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news
on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news
items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online
newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally
would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the
articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two
minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles
carefully before the time runs out.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Variable contains list of articles, sorted by click order. Comma
separated.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2509] [Invalid:11188]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkom10_click_order_session_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 2: Article click order
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight
fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles,
one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of four groups,
varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment
articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the
respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and
could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the
experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next
question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they
wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news
on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news
items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online
newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally
would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the
articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two
minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles
carefully before the time runs out.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Variable contains list of articles, sorted by click order. Comma
separated.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:234] [Invalid:13463]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkom10_click_order_session_3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 3: Article click order
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight
fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles,
one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of four groups,
varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment
articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the
respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and
could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the
experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next
question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they
wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news
on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news
items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online
newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally
would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the
articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two
minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles
carefully before the time runs out.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Variable contains list of articles, sorted by click order. Comma
separated.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:32] [Invalid:13665]
[Range:-]
|
r22padkom10_group
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Treatment group assigned at random.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. Treatment group assigned at random.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3115] [Invalid:10582]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 - Baseline 1 |
811 |
26.0% |
0.2603531 |
| 2 |
Group 2 - Baseline 2 |
762 |
24.5% |
0.2446228 |
| 3 |
Group 3 - Treatment 1 |
775 |
24.9% |
0.2487961 |
| 4 |
Group 4 - Treatment 2 |
767 |
24.6% |
0.2462279 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10582 |
|
NA |
r22padkom10_angle
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Indicates whether the treatment article has a negative or
positive angle.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. Indicates whether the treatment article has a negative or
positive angle.
Based on r22padkom10_group:
positive [2, 4]
negative [1, 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3115] [Invalid:10582]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Positive |
1529 |
49.1% |
0.4908507 |
| 2 |
Negative |
1586 |
50.9% |
0.5091493 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10582 |
|
NA |
r22padkom10_enlarged
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Indicates whether the treatment article was highlited with a
large image on the front page.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. Indicates whether the treatment article was highlited
with a large image on the front page.
Based on r22padkom10_group:
Large image [3, 4]
Small image [1, 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3115] [Invalid:10582]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes - enhanced visibility |
1542 |
49.5% |
0.4950241 |
| 0 |
No - not enhanced visibility |
1573 |
50.5% |
0.5049759 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10582 |
|
NA |
r22padkom10_order_option
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Indicates the method for sorting the news articles.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. Indicates the method for sorting the news articles.
Based on r22padkom10_group:
Random order [1]
Order speficied by editors [2]
Treatment article was displayed first, baseline below [3, 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3115] [Invalid:10582]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1: All in randomized order |
811 |
26.0% |
0.2603531 |
| 2 |
Group 2: Order speficied by editors |
762 |
24.5% |
0.2446228 |
| 3 |
Group 3, 4: Treatment article at the top |
1542 |
49.5% |
0.4950241 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10582 |
|
NA |
r22padkom10_order_group2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Indicates the order the articles were displayed.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. Indicates the order the articles were displayed. Only if
r22padkom10_group = 2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:762] [Invalid:12935]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[baseline_positiv_relevant, filler5, filler4, baseline_negativ_relevant,
filler1, filler3, filler6, filler2] |
119 |
15.6% |
0.1561680 |
| 2 |
[baseline_negativ_relevant, filler5, filler2, filler4,
baseline_positiv_relevant, filler6, filler3, filler1] |
125 |
16.4% |
0.1640420 |
| 3 |
[baseline_positiv_relevant, filler2, filler4, filler5, filler1, filler3,
basline_negativ_relevant, filler6] |
111 |
14.6% |
0.1456693 |
| 4 |
[filler2, baseline_negativ_relevant, baseline_positiv_relevant, filler1,
filler5, filler4, filler3, filler6] |
141 |
18.5% |
0.1850394 |
| 5 |
[filler2, baseline_positiv_relevant, filler1, baseline_negativ_relevant,
filler4, filler5, filler6, filler3] |
122 |
16.0% |
0.1601050 |
| 6 |
[baseline_negativ_relevant, filler5, filler4, filler2,
baseline_positiv_relevant, filler1, filler6, filler3] |
144 |
18.9% |
0.1889764 |
| Sysmiss |
|
12935 |
|
NA |
r22bk26
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
7 |
0.2% |
0.002173238 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
185 |
5.7% |
0.057435579 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
330 |
10.2% |
0.102452654 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
479 |
14.9% |
0.148711580 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
261 |
8.1% |
0.081030736 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
255 |
7.9% |
0.079167960 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
577 |
17.9% |
0.179136914 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
235 |
7.3% |
0.072958708 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
211 |
6.6% |
0.065507606 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
440 |
13.7% |
0.136603539 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
58 |
1.8% |
0.018006830 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
44 |
1.4% |
0.013660354 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
139 |
4.3% |
0.043154300 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk26_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
7 |
0.2% |
0.002173238 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
190 |
5.9% |
0.058987892 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
345 |
10.7% |
0.107109593 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
486 |
15.1% |
0.150884818 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
261 |
8.1% |
0.081030736 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
256 |
7.9% |
0.079478423 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
581 |
18.0% |
0.180378764 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
239 |
7.4% |
0.074200559 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
211 |
6.6% |
0.065507606 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of
Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of
Science in Business and Economics)) |
443 |
13.8% |
0.137534927 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
59 |
1.8% |
0.018317293 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001241850 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
139 |
4.3% |
0.043154300 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk26_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
None of the above (please enter): What is your highest completed
education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
None of the above (please enter):
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22bk25
|
Variable label:
|
What is your current income?Gross annual income is:
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
Gross annual income is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
<150 000 |
276 |
8.6% |
0.08568767 |
| 2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
363 |
11.3% |
0.11269792 |
| 3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
438 |
13.6% |
0.13598261 |
| 4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
465 |
14.4% |
0.14436510 |
| 5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
471 |
14.6% |
0.14622788 |
| 6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
374 |
11.6% |
0.11611301 |
| 7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
436 |
13.5% |
0.13536169 |
| 8 |
>1 000 000 |
226 |
7.0% |
0.07016455 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
172 |
5.3% |
0.05339957 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk33
|
Variable label:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
1485 |
46.1% |
0.461036945 |
| 2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
112 |
3.5% |
0.034771810 |
| 3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
108 |
3.4% |
0.033529960 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
128 |
4.0% |
0.039739211 |
| 5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
197 |
6.1% |
0.061161130 |
| 6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
50 |
1.6% |
0.015523129 |
| 7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
20 |
0.6% |
0.006209252 |
| 8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
184 |
5.7% |
0.057125116 |
| 9 |
Retired |
684 |
21.2% |
0.212356411 |
| 10 |
In military service |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001552313 |
| 11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
22 |
0.7% |
0.006830177 |
| 12 |
Other: |
88 |
2.7% |
0.027320708 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
138 |
4.3% |
0.042843837 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk33_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days. [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
1499 |
46.5% |
0.465383421 |
| 2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
115 |
3.6% |
0.035703198 |
| 3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
127 |
3.9% |
0.039428749 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
129 |
4.0% |
0.040049674 |
| 5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
216 |
6.7% |
0.067059919 |
| 6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
52 |
1.6% |
0.016144055 |
| 7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
21 |
0.7% |
0.006519714 |
| 8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
196 |
6.1% |
0.060850667 |
| 9 |
Retired |
692 |
21.5% |
0.214840112 |
| 10 |
In military service |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001552313 |
| 11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
23 |
0.7% |
0.007140640 |
| 12 |
Other: |
8 |
0.2% |
0.002483701 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
138 |
4.3% |
0.042843837 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk33_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have
been doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22bk21
|
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work/worked in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work/worked in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22bk33 = 1,2,3 & r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
188 |
11.0% |
0.110263930 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
477 |
28.0% |
0.279765396 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
106 |
6.2% |
0.062170088 |
| 4 |
Private business |
884 |
51.8% |
0.518475073 |
| 5 |
Self-employed |
13 |
0.8% |
0.007624633 |
| 6 |
Other: |
35 |
2.1% |
0.020527859 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001173021 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11992 |
|
NA |
r22bk21_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work/worked in? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work/worked in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22bk33 = 1,2,3 & r22group = 7]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
189 |
11.1% |
0.110850440 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
477 |
28.0% |
0.279765396 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
108 |
6.3% |
0.063343109 |
| 4 |
Private business |
907 |
53.2% |
0.531964809 |
| 5 |
Self-employed |
17 |
1.0% |
0.009970674 |
| 6 |
Other: |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002932551 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001173021 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11992 |
|
NA |
r22bk21_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which type of business do you work/worked in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22bk33 = 1,2,3 & r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22bk35
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
781 |
24.2% |
0.24247128 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
576 |
17.9% |
0.17882645 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
882 |
27.4% |
0.27382800 |
| 4 |
A village |
505 |
15.7% |
0.15678361 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
336 |
10.4% |
0.10431543 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
141 |
4.4% |
0.04377523 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk27
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
505 |
15.7% |
0.156783608 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
229 |
7.1% |
0.071095933 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
569 |
17.7% |
0.176653213 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
1544 |
47.9% |
0.479354238 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
137 |
4.3% |
0.042533375 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
91 |
2.8% |
0.028252096 |
| 7 |
Other: |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001552313 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
141 |
4.4% |
0.043775225 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk27_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status. [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
508 |
15.8% |
0.15771500 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
229 |
7.1% |
0.07109593 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
569 |
17.7% |
0.17665321 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
1545 |
48.0% |
0.47966470 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
137 |
4.3% |
0.04253337 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
92 |
2.9% |
0.02856256 |
| 7 |
Other: |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
141 |
4.4% |
0.04377523 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk27_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Marital status.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the one that is most relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22bk42
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Civil status
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
None |
2331 |
72.4% |
0.7236882956 |
| 1 |
1 |
308 |
9.6% |
0.0956224775 |
| 2 |
2 |
322 |
10.0% |
0.0999689537 |
| 3 |
3 |
93 |
2.9% |
0.0288730208 |
| 4 |
4 |
11 |
0.3% |
0.0034150885 |
| 5 |
5 |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0009313878 |
| 6 |
6 or more |
4 |
0.1% |
0.0012418504 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
149 |
4.6% |
0.0462589258 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bkhelse
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
483 |
15.0% |
0.14995343 |
| 2 |
Very good |
1155 |
35.9% |
0.35858429 |
| 3 |
Good |
921 |
28.6% |
0.28593604 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
374 |
11.6% |
0.11611301 |
| 5 |
Poor |
145 |
4.5% |
0.04501708 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
143 |
4.4% |
0.04439615 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pkklasse
|
Variable label:
|
Which social class would you place yourself in?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups
or classes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it
be?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lower class |
49 |
1.5% |
0.015212667 |
| 2 |
Working class |
463 |
14.4% |
0.143744179 |
| 3 |
Lower middle class |
313 |
9.7% |
0.097174790 |
| 4 |
Middle class |
1576 |
48.9% |
0.489289041 |
| 5 |
Upper middle class |
517 |
16.1% |
0.160509159 |
| 6 |
Upper class |
16 |
0.5% |
0.004967401 |
| 7 |
Don't know |
143 |
4.4% |
0.044396150 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
144 |
4.5% |
0.044706613 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk40
|
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 3 |
The Orthodox Church (Greek, Russian, others) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 4 |
Other Protestant religious communities (e.g. free churches, Anglican churches,
Pentecostal church and others) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 5 |
Other Christian denominations (e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses, The Latter-day Saints
and others) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 6 |
Mosaic Religious Community (Jewish) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 7 |
Islamic (Muslim) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 8 |
Eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism,
Confucianism) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 9 |
Other religions |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 10 |
Do not belong to any religion or religious denominations |
0 |
|
NaN |
| Sysmiss |
|
13697 |
|
NA |
r22bk40_recode
|
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Recoded from source variable r22bk40. Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
1805 |
56.0% |
0.56038497 |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
69 |
2.1% |
0.02142192 |
| 3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
128 |
4.0% |
0.03973921 |
| 4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
50 |
1.6% |
0.01552313 |
| 5 |
Islam |
54 |
1.7% |
0.01676498 |
| 6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities |
965 |
30.0% |
0.29959640 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
150 |
4.7% |
0.04656939 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk41
|
Variable label:
|
Aside from weddings and funerals, how often do you attend religious
meetings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often
would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
8 |
0.2% |
0.002483701 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
25 |
0.8% |
0.007761565 |
| 3 |
Once a week |
45 |
1.4% |
0.013970817 |
| 4 |
Once or a few times a month |
110 |
3.4% |
0.034150885 |
| 5 |
Several times a year |
251 |
7.8% |
0.077926110 |
| 6 |
Once a year |
400 |
12.4% |
0.124185036 |
| 7 |
Less than once a year |
566 |
17.6% |
0.175721826 |
| 8 |
Never |
1672 |
51.9% |
0.519093449 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
144 |
4.5% |
0.044706613 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk28
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
2835 |
88.0% |
0.88016144 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
242 |
7.5% |
0.07513195 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
144 |
4.5% |
0.04470661 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk28_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Citizen of a different country
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22bk29
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
2690 |
83.5% |
0.83514437 |
| 2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
250 |
7.8% |
0.07761565 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
36 |
1.1% |
0.01117665 |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
55 |
1.7% |
0.01707544 |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
42 |
1.3% |
0.01303943 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
148 |
4.6% |
0.04594846 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22bk30
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which country did you live in before you immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did you live in before you immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22bk29 = 2 & r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22bk30_1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Mother: Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both)
live in before they immigrated?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both) live in before
they immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Mother:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22bk29 = 3 & r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22bk30_1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Father: Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both)
live in before they immigrated?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both) live in before
they immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Father:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22bk29 = 3 & r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13697] [Range:-]
|
r22bk30_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: In which country did your mother live before she immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your mother live before she immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22bk29 = 4 & r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22bk30_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open: In which country did your father live before he immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your father live before he immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22bk29 = 5 & r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22oppvekstkom
|
Variable label:
|
Municipality of residence at age 15.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15
years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you
turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the
year.
Old and new municipality names
We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list
below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that
still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of
the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the
municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in
2020 are not included in the list.
Why is my municipality listed several times?
Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for
example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If
you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose
“Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Enter the name of the municipality you lived in, and then select from
the list of search results.
|
|
Post-question:
|
If the municipality is not on the list, try checking if the name is
spelled correctly in the search box
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r22oppvekstkom_sok is answered &
!(r22oppvekstkom_utland is answered | r22oppvekstkom_mangler is
answered)) & r22group = 7]
[Answer list based on response in
Filter(“R22OPPVEKSTKOM”,f(“R22OPPVEKSTKOM_sok”).get())]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22oppvekstkom_utland
|
Variable label:
|
Municipality of residence: Did not live in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15
years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you
turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the
year.
Old and new municipality names
We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list
below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that
still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of
the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the
municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in
2020 are not included in the list.
Why is my municipality listed several times?
Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for
example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If
you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose
“Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I didn’t live in Norway the year I turned 15
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22oppvekstkom_mangler ikke is answered & r22group =
7]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22oppvekstkom_mangler
|
Variable label:
|
Municipality of residence: Municipality not listed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15
years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you
turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the
year.
Old and new municipality names
We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list
below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that
still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of
the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the
municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in
2020 are not included in the list.
Why is my municipality listed several times?
Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for
example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If
you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose
“Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I can’t find my municipality on the list
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22oppvekstkom_utland ikke is answered & r22group =
7]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22oppvekstkom_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Municipality of residence at age 15
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15
years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you
turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the
year.
Old and new municipality names
We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list
below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that
still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of
the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the
municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in
2020 are not included in the list.
Why is my municipality listed several times?
Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for
example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If
you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose
“Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
When I was 15, I lived in this municipality:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22oppvekstkom_mangler is answered & r22group = 7]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22oppvekstfylke
|
Variable label:
|
Respondents home county at 15 years of age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r22oppvekstkom]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:2598] [Invalid:11099]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
228 |
8.8% |
0.08775982 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
240 |
9.2% |
0.09237875 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
161 |
6.2% |
0.06197075 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
143 |
5.5% |
0.05504234 |
| 30 |
Viken |
539 |
20.7% |
0.20746728 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
179 |
6.9% |
0.06889915 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
209 |
8.0% |
0.08044650 |
| 42 |
Agder |
140 |
5.4% |
0.05388761 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
417 |
16.1% |
0.16050808 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
202 |
7.8% |
0.07775212 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
140 |
5.4% |
0.05388761 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11099 |
|
NA |
r22pkby2
|
Variable label:
|
How much safer/unsafe has your local environment become the past years?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past
couple of years.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much safer |
102 |
3.2% |
0.03166718 |
| 2 |
Somewhat safer |
279 |
8.7% |
0.08661906 |
| 3 |
No change in safety |
1763 |
54.7% |
0.54734554 |
| 4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
833 |
25.9% |
0.25861534 |
| 5 |
Much more unsafe |
92 |
2.9% |
0.02856256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
152 |
4.7% |
0.04719031 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10476 |
|
NA |
r22pkby3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
609 |
4.4% |
0.04446229 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
2020 |
14.7% |
0.14747755 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
5795 |
42.3% |
0.42308535 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
4387 |
32.0% |
0.32028911 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
666 |
4.9% |
0.04862379 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
220 |
1.6% |
0.01606191 |
r22avslutt
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Feedback about the survey
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13697]
[Range:-]
|
r22P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
6823 |
49.8% |
0.4981383 |
| 2 |
Female |
6874 |
50.2% |
0.5018617 |
r22P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
2081 |
15.2% |
0.15193108 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
4988 |
36.4% |
0.36416734 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
707 |
5.2% |
0.05161714 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
3721 |
27.2% |
0.27166533 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
1125 |
8.2% |
0.08213477 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
1075 |
7.8% |
0.07848434 |
r22P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:3-54]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
2081 |
15.2% |
0.15193108 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
1277 |
9.3% |
0.09323209 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
575 |
4.2% |
0.04198000 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
523 |
3.8% |
0.03818354 |
| 30 |
Viken |
3182 |
23.2% |
0.23231365 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
771 |
5.6% |
0.05628970 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
1035 |
7.6% |
0.07556399 |
| 42 |
Agder |
707 |
5.2% |
0.05161714 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
1869 |
13.6% |
0.13645324 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
1125 |
8.2% |
0.08213477 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
552 |
4.0% |
0.04030080 |
r22P3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Constituencies parliament election 2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Østfold |
677 |
4.9% |
0.04942688 |
| 1 |
Akershus |
1881 |
13.7% |
0.13732934 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
2081 |
15.2% |
0.15193108 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
408 |
3.0% |
0.02978754 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
363 |
2.7% |
0.02650215 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
624 |
4.6% |
0.04555742 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
667 |
4.9% |
0.04869679 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
368 |
2.7% |
0.02686720 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
250 |
1.8% |
0.01825217 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
457 |
3.3% |
0.03336497 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
1277 |
9.3% |
0.09323209 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
1652 |
12.1% |
0.12061035 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
217 |
1.6% |
0.01584289 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
575 |
4.2% |
0.04198000 |
| 16 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
900 |
6.6% |
0.06570782 |
| 15 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
225 |
1.6% |
0.01642695 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
523 |
3.8% |
0.03818354 |
| 18 |
Troms |
400 |
2.9% |
0.02920348 |
| 19 |
Finnmark |
152 |
1.1% |
0.01109732 |
r22P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
694 |
5.1% |
0.05066803 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
4237 |
30.9% |
0.30933781 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
8391 |
61.3% |
0.61261590 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
375 |
2.7% |
0.02737826 |
r22P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
35 |
0.3% |
0.002555304 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
659 |
4.8% |
0.048112725 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
1273 |
9.3% |
0.092940060 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1733 |
12.7% |
0.126524056 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
1228 |
9.0% |
0.089654669 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
1117 |
8.2% |
0.081550705 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2833 |
20.7% |
0.206833613 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
1003 |
7.3% |
0.073227714 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
948 |
6.9% |
0.069212236 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
2172 |
15.9% |
0.158574870 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
318 |
2.3% |
0.023216763 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
179 |
1.3% |
0.013068555 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
199 |
1.5% |
0.014528729 |
r22P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
331 |
2.4% |
0.02416588 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
2113 |
15.4% |
0.15426736 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
3278 |
23.9% |
0.23932248 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
2971 |
21.7% |
0.21690881 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
2162 |
15.8% |
0.15784478 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
1512 |
11.0% |
0.11038914 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
1330 |
9.7% |
0.09710156 |
r22P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
5722 |
41.8% |
0.41775571 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
6645 |
48.5% |
0.48514273 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
1330 |
9.7% |
0.09710156 |
r22Weight1_stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, and age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation
report.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-0]
|
r22Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, and age. See documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-5]
|
r22Weight2_stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, P4_1, and age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation
report.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13322] [Invalid:375]
[Range:0-0]
|
r22Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1, and age. See documentation
report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-28]
|
r22Weight3
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1, and age. Similiar to r22Weight2,
only with capped weight value (x is >= .2 and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-5]
|
r22Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to r22_Weight3 only with capped weight value (x is >=
.2 and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13697] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-5]
|
