Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
|
Annelies Blom
|
UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Soran Hajo Dahl
|
UiB
|
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Lund Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Dag Elgesem
|
UiB
|
|
Arjan Schakel
|
UiB
|
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
|
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø
|
NORCE
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
Coordinating team
|
Name
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
|
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
|
|
Soran Hajo Dahl
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Universe: Norwegian Citizens above
the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in eight
waves:
In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 1).
In wave 3, 5 623 members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 3).
In wave 8, 4 245 new
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8).
In wave
11, 2 069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave
11).
In wave 14, 2 036 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 14).
In wave 16, 5 163 panel members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 16).
In wave 18, 2 048
panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 18).
In
wave 22, 3 221 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave
22).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry, while in wave 8 the
gross sample amounted to 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, 14, and 18, a
corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. In wave 16, the
gross sample was 34 000. In wave 22 the gross sample was 23 000.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d)
gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from
previous waves:
https://nsd.no/nsddata/serier/norsk_medborgerpanel_eng.html
In wave 23, emails were sent out on 12th and 13th of January, 2022.
An e-mail with reminder was sent out three times; January 17th, January
21st, and January 26th, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not
logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel
members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via
text message. Panel members without registered phone number were
reminded by e-mail.
Wave 23 ended on the 31st of January 2022.
Weighting
To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated.
The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population
and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata
in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns
values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will
receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a
weight below 1. The weights of the different strata are listed in the
documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information
regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are
based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample
file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information
regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when
answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weights are calculated
using the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized)
sub-groups, which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group
compared to the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, variable
columns are included in the dataset that indicates the proportion size
of strata in the population.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 23
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r23Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r23Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r23Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-103
|
2023-10-25
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 23
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r23Weight1
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r23Weight2
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r23Weight1_stratapop
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r23Weight2_stratapop
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r23P5_1
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r23P5_2
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r23P2
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r23pk204_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r23pk204 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r23bk33_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r23bk33 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r23bk21_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r23bk21 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r23bk27_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r23bk27 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
v-102
|
2022-05-04
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 23
|
|
v-101
|
2022-02-17
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 23
|
|
v-100
|
2022-02-15
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 23
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 23 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
12090
|
|
# Variables
|
118
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r23rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-22]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1499 |
12.4% |
0.12398677 |
| 3 |
|
1662 |
13.7% |
0.13746898 |
| 8 |
|
1562 |
12.9% |
0.12919768 |
| 11 |
|
882 |
7.3% |
0.07295285 |
| 14 |
|
885 |
7.3% |
0.07320099 |
| 16 |
|
2394 |
19.8% |
0.19801489 |
| 18 |
|
997 |
8.2% |
0.08246485 |
| 22 |
|
2209 |
18.3% |
0.18271299 |
r23interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r23interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11482] [Invalid:608]
[Range:-]
|
r23browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r23browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r23mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
6591 |
54.5% |
0.5451613 |
| 1 |
|
5499 |
45.5% |
0.4548387 |
r23opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r23enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
6591 |
54.5% |
0.545161290 |
| 2 |
Touch |
5446 |
45.0% |
0.450454921 |
| 3 |
Generic |
53 |
0.4% |
0.004383788 |
r23advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r23getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r23pktilfreds1
|
Variable label:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
3088 |
25.5% |
0.255417701 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
7192 |
59.5% |
0.594871795 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1430 |
11.8% |
0.118279570 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
304 |
2.5% |
0.025144748 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
58 |
0.5% |
0.004797353 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.1% |
0.001488834 |
r23pk15
|
Variable label:
|
Can most people be trusted, or one cannot be careful enough?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
88 |
0.7% |
0.007278743 |
| 1 |
1 |
66 |
0.5% |
0.005459057 |
| 2 |
2 |
184 |
1.5% |
0.015219189 |
| 3 |
3 |
359 |
3.0% |
0.029693962 |
| 4 |
4 |
414 |
3.4% |
0.034243176 |
| 5 |
5 |
1004 |
8.3% |
0.083043838 |
| 6 |
6 |
1024 |
8.5% |
0.084698098 |
| 7 |
7 |
2647 |
21.9% |
0.218941274 |
| 8 |
8 |
3304 |
27.3% |
0.273283706 |
| 9 |
9 |
1550 |
12.8% |
0.128205128 |
| 10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
1433 |
11.9% |
0.118527709 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.1% |
0.001406121 |
r23pk9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The most important political issues for you personally (1)
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or ares for you personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12090] [Range:-]
|
r23pk9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The most important political issues for you personally (2)
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or ares for you personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12090] [Range:-]
|
r23pk9_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The most important political issues for you personally (3)
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or ares for you personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12090] [Range:-]
|
r23pktilfreds3
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
249 |
2.1% |
0.020595533 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
3226 |
26.7% |
0.266832093 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
4601 |
38.1% |
0.380562448 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
2891 |
23.9% |
0.239123242 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
1094 |
9.0% |
0.090488007 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.2% |
0.002398677 |
r23pktilfreds4
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
2141 |
17.7% |
0.17708850 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
6152 |
50.9% |
0.50885029 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2415 |
20.0% |
0.19975186 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
934 |
7.7% |
0.07725393 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
292 |
2.4% |
0.02415219 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
156 |
1.3% |
0.01290323 |
r23pk10
|
Variable label:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
3410 |
28.2% |
0.282051282 |
| 2 |
Good |
5942 |
49.1% |
0.491480562 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
1410 |
11.7% |
0.116625310 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
648 |
5.4% |
0.053598015 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
422 |
3.5% |
0.034904880 |
| 6 |
Bad |
173 |
1.4% |
0.014309347 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
63 |
0.5% |
0.005210918 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
0.2% |
0.001819686 |
r23tdr17
|
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in [region] compared to [region]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation in [region] with the rest of
Norway, do you consider the situation in [region] as better, worse or
the same?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Better |
2517 |
20.8% |
0.20818859 |
| 2 |
The same |
7552 |
62.5% |
0.62464847 |
| 3 |
Worse |
1893 |
15.7% |
0.15657568 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
128 |
1.1% |
0.01058726 |
r23pk6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Christian
Democratic Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1962 |
16.2% |
0.162282878 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
2421 |
20.0% |
0.200248139 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2910 |
24.1% |
0.240694789 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2570 |
21.3% |
0.212572374 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1575 |
13.0% |
0.130272953 |
| 6 |
Really like |
420 |
3.5% |
0.034739454 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
106 |
0.9% |
0.008767577 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
126 |
1.0% |
0.010421836 |
r23pk6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Conservative
Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
582 |
4.8% |
0.048138958 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1525 |
12.6% |
0.126137304 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2133 |
17.6% |
0.176426799 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1689 |
14.0% |
0.139702233 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
3106 |
25.7% |
0.256906534 |
| 6 |
Really like |
2308 |
19.1% |
0.190901572 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
632 |
5.2% |
0.052274607 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
115 |
1.0% |
0.009511993 |
r23pk6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Progress
Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Progess Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
3682 |
30.5% |
0.304549214 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
2432 |
20.1% |
0.201157982 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1752 |
14.5% |
0.144913151 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1203 |
10.0% |
0.099503722 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1796 |
14.9% |
0.148552523 |
| 6 |
Really like |
849 |
7.0% |
0.070223325 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
261 |
2.2% |
0.021588089 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
115 |
1.0% |
0.009511993 |
r23pk6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Liberal
Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
914 |
7.6% |
0.07559967 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1489 |
12.3% |
0.12315964 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2508 |
20.7% |
0.20744417 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
3242 |
26.8% |
0.26815550 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2783 |
23.0% |
0.23019024 |
| 6 |
Really like |
858 |
7.1% |
0.07096774 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
161 |
1.3% |
0.01331679 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
135 |
1.1% |
0.01116625 |
r23pk6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Socialist
Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Socialist Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1254 |
10.4% |
0.10372208 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1699 |
14.1% |
0.14052936 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1970 |
16.3% |
0.16294458 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1888 |
15.6% |
0.15616212 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2640 |
21.8% |
0.21836228 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1887 |
15.6% |
0.15607940 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
626 |
5.2% |
0.05177833 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
126 |
1.0% |
0.01042184 |
r23pk6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Centre Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
962 |
8.0% |
0.07956989 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1603 |
13.3% |
0.13258892 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2763 |
22.9% |
0.22853598 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2512 |
20.8% |
0.20777502 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2950 |
24.4% |
0.24400331 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1021 |
8.4% |
0.08444996 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
151 |
1.2% |
0.01248966 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
128 |
1.1% |
0.01058726 |
r23pk6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Green Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2757 |
22.8% |
0.228039702 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1928 |
15.9% |
0.159470637 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1983 |
16.4% |
0.164019851 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1533 |
12.7% |
0.126799007 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2392 |
19.8% |
0.197849462 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1104 |
9.1% |
0.091315136 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
280 |
2.3% |
0.023159636 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
113 |
0.9% |
0.009346567 |
r23pk6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Labour Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
627 |
5.2% |
0.051861042 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1053 |
8.7% |
0.087096774 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2028 |
16.8% |
0.167741935 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1671 |
13.8% |
0.138213400 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
3873 |
32.0% |
0.320347395 |
| 6 |
Really like |
2321 |
19.2% |
0.191976840 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
417 |
3.4% |
0.034491315 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
100 |
0.8% |
0.008271299 |
r23pk6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Red Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2056 |
17.0% |
0.17005790 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1711 |
14.2% |
0.14152192 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1728 |
14.3% |
0.14292804 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1824 |
15.1% |
0.15086849 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2758 |
22.8% |
0.22812242 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1342 |
11.1% |
0.11100083 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
546 |
4.5% |
0.04516129 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
125 |
1.0% |
0.01033912 |
r23pk204
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if parliamentary election tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
329 |
2.7% |
0.027212572 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2815 |
23.3% |
0.232837055 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
863 |
7.1% |
0.071381307 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
554 |
4.6% |
0.045822994 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1487 |
12.3% |
0.122994210 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
842 |
7.0% |
0.069644334 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
534 |
4.4% |
0.044168734 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2367 |
19.6% |
0.195781638 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
1006 |
8.3% |
0.083209264 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
233 |
1.9% |
0.019272126 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
338 |
2.8% |
0.027956989 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
227 |
1.9% |
0.018775848 |
| 13 |
Other: |
425 |
3.5% |
0.035153019 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
70 |
0.6% |
0.005789909 |
r23pk204_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if parliamentary election tomorrow [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
329 |
2.7% |
0.02721257 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2816 |
23.3% |
0.23291977 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
864 |
7.1% |
0.07146402 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
554 |
4.6% |
0.04582299 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1487 |
12.3% |
0.12299421 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
842 |
7.0% |
0.06964433 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
534 |
4.4% |
0.04416873 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2369 |
19.6% |
0.19594706 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
1006 |
8.3% |
0.08320926 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
241 |
2.0% |
0.01993383 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
338 |
2.8% |
0.02795699 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
227 |
1.9% |
0.01877585 |
| 13 |
Other: |
278 |
2.3% |
0.02299421 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
205 |
1.7% |
0.01695616 |
r23pk204_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for which party if parliamentary election tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12090] [Range:-]
|
r23pkdv5
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage or disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
621 |
5.1% |
0.051364764 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
2477 |
20.5% |
0.204880066 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
4717 |
39.0% |
0.390157155 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1788 |
14.8% |
0.147890819 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1608 |
13.3% |
0.133002481 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
541 |
4.5% |
0.044747725 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
309 |
2.6% |
0.025558313 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.2% |
0.002398677 |
r23meme50
|
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
143 |
1.2% |
0.011827957 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
360 |
3.0% |
0.029776675 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1176 |
9.7% |
0.097270471 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
3466 |
28.7% |
0.286683209 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
3205 |
26.5% |
0.265095120 |
| 6 |
Really like |
3107 |
25.7% |
0.256989247 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
565 |
4.7% |
0.046732837 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
68 |
0.6% |
0.005624483 |
r23pkmeme9
|
Variable label:
|
Should be easier/harder for refugees to be granted residence in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and
their opportunity to be granted residence here?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much easier |
446 |
3.7% |
0.03688999 |
| 2 |
Easier |
1497 |
12.4% |
0.12382134 |
| 3 |
Somewhat easier |
2613 |
21.6% |
0.21612903 |
| 4 |
Same as today |
4400 |
36.4% |
0.36393714 |
| 5 |
Somewhat more difficult |
1507 |
12.5% |
0.12464847 |
| 6 |
More difficult |
874 |
7.2% |
0.07229115 |
| 7 |
Much more difficult |
696 |
5.8% |
0.05756824 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
0.5% |
0.00471464 |
r23pk101
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion on Norway’s preconditions for integrating refugees
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian
society for integrating refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
897 |
7.4% |
0.074193548 |
| 2 |
Good |
3578 |
29.6% |
0.295947064 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
2546 |
21.1% |
0.210587262 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
1338 |
11.1% |
0.110669975 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
2144 |
17.7% |
0.177336642 |
| 6 |
Bad |
1154 |
9.5% |
0.095450786 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
361 |
3.0% |
0.029859388 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
0.6% |
0.005955335 |
r23pkdv55
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It should be possible for parents to send their children
to Muslim schools.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian
schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the
Christian faith.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents
to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national
curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
318 |
2.6% |
0.026302730 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1125 |
9.3% |
0.093052109 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1570 |
13.0% |
0.129859388 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
2063 |
17.1% |
0.170636890 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1749 |
14.5% |
0.144665012 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2466 |
20.4% |
0.203970223 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
2745 |
22.7% |
0.227047146 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
0.4% |
0.004466501 |
r23pk12
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
952 |
7.9% |
0.078742763 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
5652 |
46.7% |
0.467493797 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
3967 |
32.8% |
0.328122415 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
1169 |
9.7% |
0.096691481 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
311 |
2.6% |
0.025723739 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.3% |
0.003225806 |
r23pk53
|
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
292 |
2.4% |
0.02415219 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
4201 |
34.7% |
0.34747725 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
5214 |
43.1% |
0.43126551 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
1850 |
15.3% |
0.15301902 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
436 |
3.6% |
0.03606286 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
97 |
0.8% |
0.00802316 |
r23pk54
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
715 |
5.9% |
0.059139785 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
5090 |
42.1% |
0.421009098 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
4602 |
38.1% |
0.380645161 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
1244 |
10.3% |
0.102894955 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
355 |
2.9% |
0.029363110 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
84 |
0.7% |
0.006947891 |
r23cov_trust_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Confidence in the way national authorities are handling
and are prepared for the coronavirus pandemic.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have confidence in the way national authorities are handling and are
prepared to tackle the coronavirus pandemic.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
460 |
3.8% |
0.038047974 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
1307 |
10.8% |
0.108105873 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
2083 |
17.2% |
0.172291150 |
| 4 |
Agree |
6676 |
55.2% |
0.552191894 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
1522 |
12.6% |
0.125889165 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.3% |
0.003473945 |
r23pkkm2
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all concerned |
627 |
5.2% |
0.051861042 |
| 2 |
Not very concerned |
1759 |
14.5% |
0.145492142 |
| 3 |
Slightly concerned |
3667 |
30.3% |
0.303308519 |
| 4 |
Very concerned |
3857 |
31.9% |
0.319023987 |
| 5 |
Extremely concerned |
2140 |
17.7% |
0.177005790 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
0.3% |
0.003308519 |
r23kmskepsis
|
Variable label:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I don’t believe that the climate is changing. |
61 |
0.5% |
0.005045492 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
453 |
3.7% |
0.037468983 |
| 3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent
due to human action |
2581 |
21.3% |
0.213482217 |
| 4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to
human action. |
8897 |
73.6% |
0.735897436 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
98 |
0.8% |
0.008105873 |
r23pkkm4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the
Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree
with this?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen
and Senja areas
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3900 |
32.3% |
0.322580645 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2271 |
18.8% |
0.187841191 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1290 |
10.7% |
0.106699752 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1601 |
13.2% |
0.132423490 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1112 |
9.2% |
0.091976840 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1086 |
9.0% |
0.089826303 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
772 |
6.4% |
0.063854425 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
0.5% |
0.004797353 |
r23pkkm42
|
Variable label:
|
Proposal that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run
on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private
vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from
2025.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
|
Post-question:
|
See National Transport Plan 2018-2029, page 16, available here [external
link]: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-33-20162017/id2546287
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run
on hydrogen. |
3818 |
31.6% |
0.31579818 |
| 2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol. |
8158 |
67.5% |
0.67477254 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
114 |
0.9% |
0.00942928 |
r23pk_vekst
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of
industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of
industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
564 |
4.7% |
0.046650124 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1317 |
10.9% |
0.108933002 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
2688 |
22.2% |
0.222332506 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1565 |
12.9% |
0.129445823 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
2581 |
21.3% |
0.213482217 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2231 |
18.5% |
0.184532672 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1071 |
8.9% |
0.088585608 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
73 |
0.6% |
0.006038048 |
r23km_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent will be exposed to
r23km_oljefremtid_1a, r23km_oljefremtid_1b, r23km_oljefremtid_2a,
r23km_oljefremtid_2b, r23km_oljefremtid_3a, r23km_oljefremtid_3b,
r23km_oljefremtid_4, r23km_avvikles_a, r23km_avvikles_b, r23km_leting_a,
r23km_leting_b, or r23km_leting_c.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12043] [Invalid:47]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
r23km_oljefremtid_1a |
996 |
8.3% |
0.08270365 |
| 2 |
r23km_oljefremtid_1b |
1001 |
8.3% |
0.08311882 |
| 3 |
r23km_oljefremtid_2a |
990 |
8.2% |
0.08220543 |
| 4 |
r23km_oljefremtid_2b |
1027 |
8.5% |
0.08527775 |
| 5 |
r23km_oljefremtid_3a |
959 |
8.0% |
0.07963132 |
| 6 |
r23km_oljefremtid_3b |
990 |
8.2% |
0.08220543 |
| 7 |
r23km_oljefremtid_4 |
1005 |
8.3% |
0.08345097 |
| 8 |
r23km_avvikles_a |
1033 |
8.6% |
0.08577597 |
| 9 |
r23km_avvikles_b |
946 |
7.9% |
0.07855186 |
| 10 |
r23km_leting_a |
1061 |
8.8% |
0.08810097 |
| 11 |
r23km_leting_b |
1017 |
8.4% |
0.08444740 |
| 12 |
r23km_leting_c |
1018 |
8.5% |
0.08453043 |
| Sysmiss |
|
47 |
|
NA |
r23km_oljefremtid_1a
|
Variable label:
|
Development of the oil and gas industry in Norway. In 20 to 30 years,
the industry should be…
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are frequent debates about how the oil and gas industry should be
developed over the next 20 to 30 years. Which of the following
alternatives is closest to your view?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23km_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
As developed as possible |
46 |
4.6% |
0.04618474 |
| 2 |
More developed than today |
51 |
5.1% |
0.05120482 |
| 3 |
As developed as today |
298 |
29.9% |
0.29919679 |
| 4 |
Less developed than today |
462 |
46.4% |
0.46385542 |
| 5 |
Discontinued |
128 |
12.9% |
0.12851406 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.1% |
0.01104418 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11094 |
|
NA |
r23km_oljefremtid_1b
|
Variable label:
|
Development of the oil and gas industry in Norway. In 10 to 15 years,
the industry should be…
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are frequent debates about how the oil and gas industry should be
developed over the next 10 to 15 years. Which of the following
alternatives is closest to your view?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In 10 to 15 years, the industry should be…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23km_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
As developed as possible |
48 |
4.8% |
0.047952048 |
| 2 |
More developed than today |
60 |
6.0% |
0.059940060 |
| 3 |
As developed as today |
331 |
33.1% |
0.330669331 |
| 4 |
Less developed than today |
488 |
48.8% |
0.487512488 |
| 5 |
Discontinued |
66 |
6.6% |
0.065934066 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.8% |
0.007992008 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11089 |
|
NA |
r23km_oljefremtid_2a
|
Variable label:
|
Development of the oil and gas industry in Norway. In 20 to 30 years,
the industry should be…
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are frequent debates about how the oil and gas industry should be
developed over the next 20 to 30 years. Which of the following
alternatives is closest to your view?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23km_ran = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
As developed as possible |
41 |
4.1% |
0.041414141 |
| 2 |
More developed than today |
47 |
4.7% |
0.047474747 |
| 3 |
As developed as today |
290 |
29.3% |
0.292929293 |
| 4 |
Less developed than today |
391 |
39.5% |
0.394949495 |
| 5 |
As little as possible |
215 |
21.7% |
0.217171717 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.6% |
0.006060606 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11100 |
|
NA |
r23km_oljefremtid_2b
|
Variable label:
|
Development of the oil and gas industry in Norway. In 10 to 15 years,
the industry should be…
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are frequent debates about how the oil and gas industry should be
developed over the next 10 to 15 years. Which of the following
alternatives is closest to your view?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In 10 to 15 years, the industry should be…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23km_ran = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
As developed as possible |
51 |
5.0% |
0.049659202 |
| 2 |
More developed than today |
47 |
4.6% |
0.045764362 |
| 3 |
As developed as today |
384 |
37.4% |
0.373904576 |
| 4 |
Less developed than today |
394 |
38.4% |
0.383641675 |
| 5 |
As little as possible |
146 |
14.2% |
0.142161636 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.5% |
0.004868549 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11063 |
|
NA |
r23km_oljefremtid_3a
|
Variable label:
|
Development of the oil and gas industry in Norway. In 20 to 30 years,
the industry should be…
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are frequent debates about how the oil and gas industry should be
developed over the next 20 to 30 years. Which of the following
alternatives is closest to your view?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23km_ran = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
As developed as possible |
47 |
4.9% |
0.049009385 |
| 2 |
More developed than today |
43 |
4.5% |
0.044838373 |
| 3 |
As developed as today |
272 |
28.4% |
0.283628780 |
| 4 |
Less developed than today |
347 |
36.2% |
0.361835245 |
| 5 |
As little as possible |
182 |
19.0% |
0.189781022 |
| 6 |
Discontinued |
62 |
6.5% |
0.064650678 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.6% |
0.006256517 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11131 |
|
NA |
r23km_oljefremtid_3b
|
Variable label:
|
Development of the oil and gas industry in Norway. In 10 to 15 years,
the industry should be…
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are frequent debates about how the oil and gas industry should be
developed over the next 10 to 15 years. Which of the following
alternatives is closest to your view?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In 10 to 15 years, the industry should be…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23km_ran = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
As developed as possible |
50 |
5.1% |
0.050505051 |
| 2 |
More developed than today |
46 |
4.6% |
0.046464646 |
| 3 |
As developed as today |
337 |
34.0% |
0.340404040 |
| 4 |
Less developed than today |
342 |
34.5% |
0.345454545 |
| 5 |
As little as possible |
171 |
17.3% |
0.172727273 |
| 6 |
Discontinued |
37 |
3.7% |
0.037373737 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.7% |
0.007070707 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11100 |
|
NA |
r23km_oljefremtid_4
|
Variable label:
|
Development of the oil and gas industry in Norway. In 20 to 30 years,
the industry should be…
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Production of oil and gas is an important industry for Norway. The
industry provides many jobs and considerable income for society. At the
same time, burning fossil energy is the main cause of climate change.
Opening new areas is also controversial because it can affect life in
the sea and at the ice edge. There are frequent debates about how the
oil and gas industry in Norway should be developed over the next 20 to
30 years.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23km_ran = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
As developed as possible |
43 |
4.3% |
0.042786070 |
| 2 |
More developed than today |
43 |
4.3% |
0.042786070 |
| 3 |
As developed as today |
255 |
25.4% |
0.253731343 |
| 4 |
Less developed than today |
414 |
41.2% |
0.411940299 |
| 5 |
As little as possible |
247 |
24.6% |
0.245771144 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002985075 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11085 |
|
NA |
r23km_avvikles_a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The oil and gas industry in Norway should be
discontinued within 20 to 30 years.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statement below. To what extend do you agree or disagree
with it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The oil and gas industry in Norway should be discontinued within 20 to
30 years.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23km_ran = 8]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
97 |
9.4% |
0.0939012585 |
| 2 |
Agree |
117 |
11.3% |
0.1132623427 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
177 |
17.1% |
0.1713455954 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
148 |
14.3% |
0.1432720232 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
160 |
15.5% |
0.1548886738 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
175 |
16.9% |
0.1694094869 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
158 |
15.3% |
0.1529525653 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0009680542 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11057 |
|
NA |
r23km_avvikles_b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The oil and gas industry in Norway should be
discontinued within 10 to 15 years
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statement below. To what extend do you agree or disagree
with it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The oil and gas industry in Norway should be discontinued within 10 to
15 years.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23km_ran = 9]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
43 |
4.5% |
0.045454545 |
| 2 |
Agree |
92 |
9.7% |
0.097251586 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
125 |
13.2% |
0.132135307 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
107 |
11.3% |
0.113107822 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
170 |
18.0% |
0.179704017 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
201 |
21.2% |
0.212473573 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
207 |
21.9% |
0.218816068 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001057082 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11144 |
|
NA |
r23km_leting_a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norway should stop searching for new oil and gas fields.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statement below. To what extend do you agree or disagree
with it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should stop searching for new oil and gas fields.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23km_ran = 10]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
120 |
11.3% |
0.113100848 |
| 2 |
Agree |
144 |
13.6% |
0.135721018 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
153 |
14.4% |
0.144203582 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
96 |
9.0% |
0.090480679 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
205 |
19.3% |
0.193213949 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
197 |
18.6% |
0.185673893 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
142 |
13.4% |
0.133836004 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.4% |
0.003770028 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11029 |
|
NA |
r23km_leting_b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norway should immediately stop searching for new oil and
gas fields.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statement below. To what extend do you agree or disagree
with it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should immediately stop searching for new oil and gas fields.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23km_ran = 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
100 |
9.8% |
0.098328417 |
| 2 |
Agree |
113 |
11.1% |
0.111111111 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
113 |
11.1% |
0.111111111 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
94 |
9.2% |
0.092428712 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
181 |
17.8% |
0.177974435 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
202 |
19.9% |
0.198623402 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
210 |
20.6% |
0.206489676 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.4% |
0.003933137 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11073 |
|
NA |
r23km_leting_c
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norway should stop searching for new oil and gas fields
within the next three years.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statement below. To what extend do you agree or disagree
with it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should stop searching for new oil and gas fields within the next
three years.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23km_ran = 12]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
131 |
12.9% |
0.128683694 |
| 2 |
Agree |
116 |
11.4% |
0.113948919 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
116 |
11.4% |
0.113948919 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
98 |
9.6% |
0.096267191 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
141 |
13.9% |
0.138506876 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
212 |
20.8% |
0.208251473 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
201 |
19.7% |
0.197445972 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002946955 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11072 |
|
NA |
r23pcelc_1
|
Variable label:
|
Level of agreement/disagreement to different measures the authorites can
introduce to lower electricity costs for consumer in Norway: Compensate
consumers when electricity prices are high.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should compensate
consumers when electricity prices are high
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 1, 3, 8, 11]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1798 |
32.1% |
0.32078501 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1532 |
27.3% |
0.27332739 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1017 |
18.1% |
0.18144514 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
413 |
7.4% |
0.07368421 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
263 |
4.7% |
0.04692239 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
244 |
4.4% |
0.04353256 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
226 |
4.0% |
0.04032114 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
112 |
2.0% |
0.01998216 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6485 |
|
NA |
r23pcelc_2
|
Variable label:
|
Level of agreement/disagreement to different measures the authorites can
introduce to lower electricity costs for consumer in Norway: Expand
Norwegian power production.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should expand
Norwegian power production
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 1, 3, 8, 11]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1379 |
24.6% |
0.24603033 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1733 |
30.9% |
0.30918822 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1204 |
21.5% |
0.21480821 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
566 |
10.1% |
0.10098127 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
300 |
5.4% |
0.05352364 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
199 |
3.6% |
0.03550401 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
105 |
1.9% |
0.01873327 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
119 |
2.1% |
0.02123104 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6485 |
|
NA |
r23pcelc_3
|
Variable label:
|
Level of agreement/disagreement to different measures the authorites can
introduce to lower electricity costs for consumer in Norway: Export less
electricity abroad.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should export
less electricity abroad
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 1, 3, 8, 11]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1967 |
35.1% |
0.35093666 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1405 |
25.1% |
0.25066905 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
856 |
15.3% |
0.15272079 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
724 |
12.9% |
0.12917038 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
269 |
4.8% |
0.04799286 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
207 |
3.7% |
0.03693131 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
86 |
1.5% |
0.01534344 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
91 |
1.6% |
0.01623550 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6485 |
|
NA |
r23pcelc_4
|
Variable label:
|
Level of agreement/disagreement to different measures the authorites can
introduce to lower electricity costs for consumer in Norway: Refrain
from introducing measures to reduce electricity costs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should refrain
from introducing measures to reduce electricity costs
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 1, 3, 8, 11]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
126 |
2.2% |
0.02247993 |
| 2 |
Agree |
161 |
2.9% |
0.02872435 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
218 |
3.9% |
0.03889384 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
542 |
9.7% |
0.09669938 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
689 |
12.3% |
0.12292596 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1668 |
29.8% |
0.29759144 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
2039 |
36.4% |
0.36378234 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
162 |
2.9% |
0.02890277 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6485 |
|
NA |
r23pcelc_5
|
Variable label:
|
Level of agreement/disagreement to different measures the authorites can
introduce to lower electricity costs for consumer in Norway: Increase
financial support for electricity-saving measures.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should increase
financial support for electricity-saving measures
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 1, 3, 8, 11]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2110 |
37.6% |
0.376449599 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1999 |
35.7% |
0.356645852 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
867 |
15.5% |
0.154683318 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
327 |
5.8% |
0.058340767 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
87 |
1.6% |
0.015521855 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
56 |
1.0% |
0.009991079 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
48 |
0.9% |
0.008563782 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
111 |
2.0% |
0.019803747 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6485 |
|
NA |
r23pcelc_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Other measures the authorities can introduce to lower electricity
costs for consumers in Norway: Other, write here.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should: Other:
Write here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 1, 3, 8, 11]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12090] [Range:-]
|
r23pk_sentral
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: National authorities show little consideration for
non-urban/rural Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
|
|
Literal question:
|
National authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1744 |
14.4% |
0.144251447 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2862 |
23.7% |
0.236724566 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
3077 |
25.5% |
0.254507858 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
2022 |
16.7% |
0.167245658 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
900 |
7.4% |
0.074441687 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1026 |
8.5% |
0.084863524 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
357 |
3.0% |
0.029528536 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
102 |
0.8% |
0.008436725 |
r23tdr19
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich
parts of the country to parts that are not so rich.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the
country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives
public services of the same quality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1640 |
13.6% |
0.135649297 |
| 2 |
Agree |
4237 |
35.0% |
0.350454921 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
3443 |
28.5% |
0.284780811 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1487 |
12.3% |
0.122994210 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
685 |
5.7% |
0.056658395 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
355 |
2.9% |
0.029363110 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
120 |
1.0% |
0.009925558 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
123 |
1.0% |
0.010173697 |
r23pk55
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The number of municipalities should be reduced.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway now has 356 municipalities instead of 422 as before. The number
of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1167 |
9.7% |
0.096526055 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1677 |
13.9% |
0.138709677 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1614 |
13.3% |
0.133498759 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
2668 |
22.1% |
0.220678246 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1284 |
10.6% |
0.106203474 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2175 |
18.0% |
0.179900744 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1389 |
11.5% |
0.114888337 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
116 |
1.0% |
0.009594706 |
r23_tdr_merger_a
|
Variable label:
|
Closest to your view on merging municipalities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In recent years, there has been a debate about merging (county)
municipalities. Some are in favor of further mergers, and some believe
that some merged (county) municipalities should have the opportunity to
break apart again. Still others want to keep (county) municipalities as
they currently are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to you view?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p7per108a
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 1,3,8,11]
[Displayed on the same page as r23_tdr_merger_b]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Futher mergers of municipalities. |
1796 |
32.0% |
0.32042819 |
| 2 |
Keep the number of municipalities as it is today. |
1735 |
31.0% |
0.30954505 |
| 3 |
Possibility for merged municipalities to break apart. |
1992 |
35.5% |
0.35539697 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
82 |
1.5% |
0.01462979 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6485 |
|
NA |
r23_tdr_merger_b
|
Variable label:
|
Closest to your view on merging county municipalities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In recent years, there has been a debate about merging (county)
municipalities. Some are in favor of further mergers, and some believe
that some merged (county) municipalities should have the opportunity to
break apart again. Still others want to keep (county) municipalities as
they currently are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to you view?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p7per108b
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 1,3,8,11]
[Displayed on the same page as r23_tdr_merger_a]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Futher mergers of county municipalities. |
766 |
13.7% |
0.13666369 |
| 2 |
Keep the number of county municipalities as it is today. |
1937 |
34.6% |
0.34558430 |
| 3 |
Possibility for merged county municipalities to break apart. |
2738 |
48.8% |
0.48849242 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
164 |
2.9% |
0.02925959 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6485 |
|
NA |
r23pkby3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
349 |
2.9% |
0.02886683 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
1504 |
12.4% |
0.12440033 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
5246 |
43.4% |
0.43391232 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
4310 |
35.6% |
0.35649297 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
557 |
4.6% |
0.04607113 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
124 |
1.0% |
0.01025641 |
r23pk52
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The authorities should introduce more measures to
protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may
be at the expense of privacy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from
potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of
privacy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
879 |
7.3% |
0.072704715 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2382 |
19.7% |
0.197022333 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
3454 |
28.6% |
0.285690653 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1686 |
13.9% |
0.139454094 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1562 |
12.9% |
0.129197684 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1348 |
11.1% |
0.111497105 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
675 |
5.6% |
0.055831266 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
104 |
0.9% |
0.008602151 |
r23pk103
|
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
1437 |
11.9% |
0.11885856 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
2970 |
24.6% |
0.24565757 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
3456 |
28.6% |
0.28585608 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1442 |
11.9% |
0.11927213 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1466 |
12.1% |
0.12125724 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
728 |
6.0% |
0.06021505 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
413 |
3.4% |
0.03416046 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
178 |
1.5% |
0.01472291 |
r23pk60
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The Government should work to reduce the income
differences.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income
differences in society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3360 |
27.8% |
0.277915633 |
| 2 |
Agree |
3499 |
28.9% |
0.289412738 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
2556 |
21.1% |
0.211414392 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1131 |
9.4% |
0.093548387 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
744 |
6.2% |
0.061538462 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
504 |
4.2% |
0.041687345 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
183 |
1.5% |
0.015136476 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
113 |
0.9% |
0.009346567 |
r23pkmeme21
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted
sexual attention?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own
responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
139 |
1.1% |
0.01149711 |
| 2 |
Agree |
390 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1416 |
11.7% |
0.11712159 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1170 |
9.7% |
0.09677419 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1229 |
10.2% |
0.10165426 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
3358 |
27.8% |
0.27775021 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
4259 |
35.2% |
0.35227461 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
129 |
1.1% |
0.01066998 |
r23_antibiotika_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in
[r23_antibiotika].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if rekruttert = 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2188] [Invalid:9902]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
word antibiotics |
1068 |
48.8% |
0.488117 |
| 2 |
words antibiotics-resistant bacteria |
1120 |
51.2% |
0.511883 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9902 |
|
NA |
r23_antibiotika
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What do you think when you hear or read the [r23_antibiotika_ran]?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the [r23_antibiotika_ran]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 22]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12090]
[Range:-]
|
r23sdo7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: An ideal society requires some groups to
be on top and others to be on the bottom
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
An ideal society requires some groups to be on top and others to be on
the bottom
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
2320 |
35.8% |
0.35774865 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
1116 |
17.2% |
0.17208944 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
732 |
11.3% |
0.11287587 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
926 |
14.3% |
0.14279106 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
730 |
11.3% |
0.11256746 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
447 |
6.9% |
0.06892830 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
99 |
1.5% |
0.01526600 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
115 |
1.8% |
0.01773323 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5605 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_2
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: Some groups of people are simply inferior
to other groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
3727 |
57.5% |
0.57471087 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
701 |
10.8% |
0.10809561 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
364 |
5.6% |
0.05612953 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
826 |
12.7% |
0.12737086 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
406 |
6.3% |
0.06260601 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
238 |
3.7% |
0.03670008 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
101 |
1.6% |
0.01557440 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
122 |
1.9% |
0.01881264 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5605 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_3
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: No one group should dominate in society.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
No one group should dominate in society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
224 |
3.5% |
0.03454125 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
249 |
3.8% |
0.03839630 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
300 |
4.6% |
0.04626060 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
688 |
10.6% |
0.10609098 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
672 |
10.4% |
0.10362375 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
1406 |
21.7% |
0.21680802 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
2832 |
43.7% |
0.43670008 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
114 |
1.8% |
0.01757903 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5605 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_4
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: Groups at the bottom are just as deserving
as groups at the top.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
274 |
4.2% |
0.04225135 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
436 |
6.7% |
0.06723207 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
602 |
9.3% |
0.09282961 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
875 |
13.5% |
0.13492675 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
768 |
11.8% |
0.11842714 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
1377 |
21.2% |
0.21233616 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
2033 |
31.3% |
0.31349268 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
120 |
1.9% |
0.01850424 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5605 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_5
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: Equality between groups should not be our
main goal.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Equality between groups should not be our main goal.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
1256 |
19.4% |
0.19367772 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
1308 |
20.2% |
0.20169622 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
748 |
11.5% |
0.11534310 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
1204 |
18.6% |
0.18565921 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
837 |
12.9% |
0.12906708 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
644 |
9.9% |
0.09930609 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
363 |
5.6% |
0.05597533 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
125 |
1.9% |
0.01927525 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5605 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_6
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
1413 |
21.8% |
0.21788743 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
1141 |
17.6% |
0.17594449 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
736 |
11.3% |
0.11349268 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
1457 |
22.5% |
0.22467232 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
749 |
11.5% |
0.11549730 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
575 |
8.9% |
0.08866615 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
277 |
4.3% |
0.04271396 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
137 |
2.1% |
0.02112567 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5605 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_7
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: We should do what we can to equalize
conditions for different groups.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
65 |
1.0% |
0.01002313 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
168 |
2.6% |
0.02590594 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
273 |
4.2% |
0.04209715 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
670 |
10.3% |
0.10331534 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
1070 |
16.5% |
0.16499614 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
1587 |
24.5% |
0.24471858 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
2540 |
39.2% |
0.39167309 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
112 |
1.7% |
0.01727062 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5605 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_8
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: We should work to give all groups an equal
chance to succeed.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should work to give all groups an equal chance to succeed.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
38 |
0.6% |
0.005859676 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
25 |
0.4% |
0.003855050 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
67 |
1.0% |
0.010331534 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
317 |
4.9% |
0.048882035 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
568 |
8.8% |
0.087586739 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
1365 |
21.0% |
0.210485736 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
4004 |
61.7% |
0.617424827 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
101 |
1.6% |
0.015574402 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5605 |
|
NA |
r23bk33
|
Variable label:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-14]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
100% furloughed by employer |
28 |
0.2% |
0.0023159636 |
| 2 |
Partially furloughed by employer |
27 |
0.2% |
0.0022332506 |
| 3 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
5355 |
44.3% |
0.4429280397 |
| 4 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
391 |
3.2% |
0.0323407775 |
| 5 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
336 |
2.8% |
0.0277915633 |
| 6 |
Self-employed |
470 |
3.9% |
0.0388751034 |
| 7 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
294 |
2.4% |
0.0243176179 |
| 8 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
75 |
0.6% |
0.0062034739 |
| 9 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
36 |
0.3% |
0.0029776675 |
| 10 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
648 |
5.4% |
0.0535980149 |
| 11 |
Retired |
3896 |
32.2% |
0.3222497932 |
| 12 |
In military service |
7 |
0.1% |
0.0005789909 |
| 13 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
68 |
0.6% |
0.0056244830 |
| 14 |
Other: |
333 |
2.8% |
0.0275434243 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
126 |
1.0% |
0.0104218362 |
r23bk33_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days. [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-14]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
100% furloughed by employer |
29 |
0.2% |
0.0023986766 |
| 2 |
Partially furloughed by employer |
27 |
0.2% |
0.0022332506 |
| 3 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
5384 |
44.5% |
0.4453267163 |
| 4 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
393 |
3.3% |
0.0325062035 |
| 5 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
368 |
3.0% |
0.0304383788 |
| 6 |
Self-employed |
486 |
4.0% |
0.0401985112 |
| 7 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
331 |
2.7% |
0.0273779983 |
| 8 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
82 |
0.7% |
0.0067824648 |
| 9 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
36 |
0.3% |
0.0029776675 |
| 10 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
696 |
5.8% |
0.0575682382 |
| 11 |
Retired |
3973 |
32.9% |
0.3286186931 |
| 12 |
In military service |
8 |
0.1% |
0.0006617039 |
| 13 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
75 |
0.6% |
0.0062034739 |
| 14 |
Other: |
76 |
0.6% |
0.0062861869 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
126 |
1.0% |
0.0104218362 |
r23bk33_14_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have
been doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12090] [Range:-]
|
r23bk21
|
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23bk33 = 1, 2,3, 4, 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
733 |
11.9% |
0.119439466 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1927 |
31.4% |
0.313997067 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
403 |
6.6% |
0.065667264 |
| 4 |
Private business |
2908 |
47.4% |
0.473847157 |
| 5 |
Self-employed |
27 |
0.4% |
0.004399544 |
| 6 |
Other: |
130 |
2.1% |
0.021182988 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.1% |
0.001466515 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5953 |
|
NA |
r23bk21_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23bk33 = 1, 2,3, 4, 5]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
734 |
12.0% |
0.119602412 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1937 |
31.6% |
0.315626528 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
415 |
6.8% |
0.067622617 |
| 4 |
Private business |
2982 |
48.6% |
0.485905165 |
| 5 |
Self-employed |
29 |
0.5% |
0.004725436 |
| 6 |
Other: |
31 |
0.5% |
0.005051328 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.1% |
0.001466515 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5953 |
|
NA |
r23bk21_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23bk33 = 1, 2,3, 4, 5]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12090] [Range:-]
|
r23permittert
|
Variable label:
|
Have you been furloughed or have you lost your job due to the Corona
pandemic?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you been furloughed or have you lost your job due to the Corona
pandemic?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I am 100% furloughed now |
31 |
0.3% |
0.002564103 |
| 2 |
Yes, I have been 100% furloughed, but not any longer |
259 |
2.1% |
0.021422663 |
| 3 |
Yes, I am partially furloughed now |
36 |
0.3% |
0.002977667 |
| 4 |
Yes, I have been partially furloughed, but not any longer |
278 |
2.3% |
0.022994210 |
| 5 |
Yes, I lost my job and am unemployed |
42 |
0.3% |
0.003473945 |
| 6 |
Yes, I lost my job but am no longer unemployed |
63 |
0.5% |
0.005210918 |
| 7 |
No |
11097 |
91.8% |
0.917866005 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
284 |
2.3% |
0.023490488 |
r23permittertb
|
Variable label:
|
How long in total have you been on furlough/unemployed due to the Corona
pandemic?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How long in total have you been on furlough/unemployed due to the Corona
pandemic?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23permittert = 1,2,3,4,5,6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than one month |
103 |
14.5% |
0.145275035 |
| 2 |
Between 1 to 3 months |
311 |
43.9% |
0.438645980 |
| 3 |
Between 3 to 6 months |
123 |
17.3% |
0.173483780 |
| 4 |
More than 6 months |
167 |
23.6% |
0.235543018 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.7% |
0.007052186 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11381 |
|
NA |
r23pkby2
|
Variable label:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has your local environment become over the
past couple of years?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past
couple of years.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much safer |
139 |
1.1% |
0.01149711 |
| 2 |
Somewhat safer |
764 |
6.3% |
0.06319272 |
| 3 |
No change in safety |
8532 |
70.6% |
0.70570720 |
| 4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
2251 |
18.6% |
0.18618693 |
| 5 |
Much more unsafe |
265 |
2.2% |
0.02191894 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
139 |
1.1% |
0.01149711 |
r23pk13
|
Variable label:
|
Whether the political system in Norway allows you to have a say
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you say the political system in Norway allows
people like you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
41 |
1.9% |
0.01856043 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
300 |
13.6% |
0.13580806 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
898 |
40.7% |
0.40651879 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
701 |
31.7% |
0.31733816 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
224 |
10.1% |
0.10140335 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
2.0% |
0.02037121 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9881 |
|
NA |
r23pk14
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me
do not understand.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not
understand what it’s about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
122 |
5.5% |
0.05522861 |
| 2 |
Agree |
271 |
12.3% |
0.12267995 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
619 |
28.0% |
0.28021729 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
198 |
9.0% |
0.08963332 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
238 |
10.8% |
0.10774106 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
516 |
23.4% |
0.23358986 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
205 |
9.3% |
0.09280217 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
1.8% |
0.01810774 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9881 |
|
NA |
r23bk27
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
1167 |
11.8% |
0.118105455 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
463 |
4.7% |
0.046857606 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
1532 |
15.5% |
0.155045036 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
5642 |
57.1% |
0.570994839 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
565 |
5.7% |
0.057180447 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
386 |
3.9% |
0.039064872 |
| 7 |
Other: |
25 |
0.3% |
0.002530108 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
101 |
1.0% |
0.010221637 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2209 |
|
NA |
r23bk27_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status. Click on the one that is most relevant [coded]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
1172 |
11.9% |
0.1186114766 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
466 |
4.7% |
0.0471612185 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
1534 |
15.5% |
0.1552474446 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
5646 |
57.1% |
0.5713996559 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
567 |
5.7% |
0.0573828560 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
387 |
3.9% |
0.0391660763 |
| 7 |
Other: |
7 |
0.1% |
0.0007084303 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
102 |
1.0% |
0.0103228418 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2209 |
|
NA |
r23bk27_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Civil status.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12090] [Range:-]
|
r23bk35
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
2261 |
22.9% |
0.22882299 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
2094 |
21.2% |
0.21192187 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
2708 |
27.4% |
0.27406133 |
| 4 |
A village |
1559 |
15.8% |
0.15777755 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
1152 |
11.7% |
0.11658739 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
107 |
1.1% |
0.01082886 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2209 |
|
NA |
r23bk42
|
Variable label:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in
that case how many?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in
that case how many?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
None |
7972 |
80.7% |
0.8068009311 |
| 1 |
1 |
801 |
8.1% |
0.0810646696 |
| 2 |
2 |
741 |
7.5% |
0.0749924097 |
| 3 |
3 |
219 |
2.2% |
0.0221637486 |
| 4 |
4 |
23 |
0.2% |
0.0023276996 |
| 5 |
5 |
6 |
0.1% |
0.0006072260 |
| 6 |
6 or more |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0005060217 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
114 |
1.2% |
0.0115372938 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2209 |
|
NA |
r23bkhelse
|
Variable label:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
1260 |
12.8% |
0.12751746 |
| 2 |
Very good |
3189 |
32.3% |
0.32274061 |
| 3 |
Good |
3475 |
35.2% |
0.35168505 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
1411 |
14.3% |
0.14279931 |
| 5 |
Poor |
439 |
4.4% |
0.04442870 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
107 |
1.1% |
0.01082886 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2209 |
|
NA |
r23pkklasse
|
Variable label:
|
Which social class would you place yourself in?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups
or classes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it
be?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lower class |
142 |
1.4% |
0.014371015 |
| 2 |
Working class |
1269 |
12.8% |
0.128428297 |
| 3 |
Lower middle class |
1133 |
11.5% |
0.114664508 |
| 4 |
Middle class |
5560 |
56.3% |
0.562696083 |
| 5 |
Upper middle class |
1589 |
16.1% |
0.160813683 |
| 6 |
Upper class |
40 |
0.4% |
0.004048173 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
148 |
1.5% |
0.014978241 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2209 |
|
NA |
r23bk25
|
Variable label:
|
What is your current income?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your current income?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
<150 000 |
303 |
3.1% |
0.03066491 |
| 2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
980 |
9.9% |
0.09918024 |
| 3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
1468 |
14.9% |
0.14856796 |
| 4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1520 |
15.4% |
0.15383058 |
| 5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
1579 |
16.0% |
0.15980164 |
| 6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
1347 |
13.6% |
0.13632223 |
| 7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
1588 |
16.1% |
0.16071248 |
| 8 |
>1 000 000 |
818 |
8.3% |
0.08278514 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
278 |
2.8% |
0.02813480 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2209 |
|
NA |
r23avslutt
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Feedback about the survey
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12090]
[Range:-]
|
r23P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
6096 |
50.4% |
0.5042184 |
| 2 |
Female |
5994 |
49.6% |
0.4957816 |
r23P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
1841 |
15.2% |
0.15227461 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
4421 |
36.6% |
0.36567411 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
600 |
5.0% |
0.04962779 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
3320 |
27.5% |
0.27460711 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
983 |
8.1% |
0.08130687 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
925 |
7.7% |
0.07650951 |
r23P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:3-54]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
1841 |
15.2% |
0.15227461 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
1134 |
9.4% |
0.09379653 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
510 |
4.2% |
0.04218362 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
451 |
3.7% |
0.03730356 |
| 30 |
Viken |
2801 |
23.2% |
0.23167907 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
687 |
5.7% |
0.05682382 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
933 |
7.7% |
0.07717122 |
| 42 |
Agder |
600 |
5.0% |
0.04962779 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
1676 |
13.9% |
0.13862696 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
983 |
8.1% |
0.08130687 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
474 |
3.9% |
0.03920596 |
r23P3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Constituencies parliament election 2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12059] [Invalid:31]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Østfold |
572 |
4.7% |
0.04743345 |
| 1 |
Akershus |
1698 |
14.1% |
0.14080770 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
1836 |
15.2% |
0.15225143 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
372 |
3.1% |
0.03084833 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
313 |
2.6% |
0.02595572 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
525 |
4.4% |
0.04353595 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
604 |
5.0% |
0.05008707 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
327 |
2.7% |
0.02711668 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
220 |
1.8% |
0.01824364 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
379 |
3.1% |
0.03142881 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
1128 |
9.4% |
0.09354009 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
1470 |
12.2% |
0.12190066 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
204 |
1.7% |
0.01691683 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
508 |
4.2% |
0.04212621 |
| 16 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
786 |
6.5% |
0.06517953 |
| 15 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
193 |
1.6% |
0.01600464 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
450 |
3.7% |
0.03731653 |
| 18 |
Troms |
349 |
2.9% |
0.02894104 |
| 19 |
Finnmark |
125 |
1.0% |
0.01036570 |
| Sysmiss |
|
31 |
|
NA |
r23P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
561 |
4.6% |
0.04640199 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
3660 |
30.3% |
0.30272953 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
7625 |
63.1% |
0.63068652 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
244 |
2.0% |
0.02018197 |
r23P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
29 |
0.2% |
0.002398677 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
532 |
4.4% |
0.044003309 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
1075 |
8.9% |
0.088916460 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1469 |
12.2% |
0.121505376 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
1113 |
9.2% |
0.092059553 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
1011 |
8.4% |
0.083622829 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2559 |
21.2% |
0.211662531 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
849 |
7.0% |
0.070223325 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
860 |
7.1% |
0.071133168 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
2033 |
16.8% |
0.168155500 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
313 |
2.6% |
0.025889165 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
155 |
1.3% |
0.012820513 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
92 |
0.8% |
0.007609595 |
r23P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
278 |
2.3% |
0.02299421 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
1945 |
16.1% |
0.16087676 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
3069 |
25.4% |
0.25384615 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
2735 |
22.6% |
0.22622002 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
1883 |
15.6% |
0.15574855 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
1227 |
10.1% |
0.10148883 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
953 |
7.9% |
0.07882548 |
r23P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
5292 |
43.8% |
0.43771712 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
5845 |
48.3% |
0.48345740 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
953 |
7.9% |
0.07882548 |
r23Weight1_stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, and age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation
report.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-0]
|
r23Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, and age. See documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-9]
|
r23Weight2_stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, P4_1, and age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation
report.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11846] [Invalid:244]
[Range:0-0]
|
r23Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1, and age. See documentation
report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-53]
|
r23Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12090] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-5]
|
