Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
|
Sina Storelv
|
UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Lund Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
NORCE
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
|
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø
|
NORCE
|
|
Arjan Schakel
|
UiB
|
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
UiB
|
Coordinating team
|
Name
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
|
Sina Storelv
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Universe: Norwegian Citizens 18 years
or older.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in the
following waves:
|
Round
|
Sample size
|
Recruited
|
|
1
|
25 000
|
4 870
|
|
3
|
25 000
|
5 623
|
|
8
|
22 000
|
4 245
|
|
11
|
14 000
|
2 069
|
|
14
|
14 000
|
2 036
|
|
16
|
34 000
|
5 163
|
|
18
|
14 000
|
2 048
|
|
22
|
23 000
|
3 221
|
|
25
|
18 000
|
2 405
|
All samples are drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d)
gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from
previous waves:
https://nsd.no/nsddata/serier/norsk_medborgerpanel_eng.html
In wave 25, emails were sent out on 31st of October, 2022.
An email with reminder was sent out three times; November 4th, November
10th, and November 17th, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not
logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel
members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via
text message. Panel members without registered phone number were
reminded by email.
New respondents drawn from the population registry were invited by post
31st of October. A postcard was distributed 14th of November to those
above the age of 60, and those under 60 not enlisted with a telephone
number. The counterparts enlisted with telephonenumber received a text
message on November 17th. The reminders was sendt to respondents who had
not accessed or completed the survey.
Wave 25 ended on the 28th of November 2022.
Weighting
To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated.
The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population
and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata
in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns
values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will
receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a
weight below 1. The weights of the different strata are listed in the
documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information
regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are
based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample
file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information
regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when
answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weights are calculated
using the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized)
sub-groups, which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group
compared to the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, variable
columns are included in the dataset that indicates the proportion size
of strata in the population.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 25
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r25_Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r25_Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r25_Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-102
|
2023-10-25
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 25
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-30
|
r25_bgedu
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-30
|
r25_pcvot21
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-06-27
|
r25_pcsaf
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-03-28
|
r25_bgupc
|
New
variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years
of age, based on registered municipality in r25_bgupm
|
|
NA
|
2023-03-28
|
r25_bgupc
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-101
|
2023-02-03
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 25
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_dvrepx1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_dvrepx2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_dvrepx3
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_dvrepx4
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_dvrepx5
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_dvrepx6
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_dvrepx7
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_dvrepx8
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_dveas
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_dvcas
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_lisatx1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_cerenx_1b_ran
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_cerenx_2_ran1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_cerenx_2_ran2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_cerenx_3_ran1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_cerenx_wording
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-02-02
|
r25_cerenx_t_order
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-100
|
2022-12-16
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 25
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 25 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
13740
|
|
# Variables
|
382
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r25_rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
The wave the respondent was recruited
|
|
Technical description:
|
The wave the respondent was recruited
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-25]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
1489 |
10.8% |
0.10836972 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
1612 |
11.7% |
0.11732169 |
| 8 |
Wave 8 |
1456 |
10.6% |
0.10596798 |
| 11 |
Wave 11 |
822 |
6.0% |
0.05982533 |
| 14 |
Wave 14 |
852 |
6.2% |
0.06200873 |
| 16 |
Wave 16 |
2316 |
16.9% |
0.16855895 |
| 18 |
Wave 18 |
953 |
6.9% |
0.06935953 |
| 22 |
Wave 22 |
1835 |
13.4% |
0.13355167 |
| 25 |
Wave 25 |
2405 |
17.5% |
0.17503639 |
r25_group
|
Variable label:
|
Subgroup in wave 25. Assigned at random, with the exception of group 6
which is reserved for r25_rekruttert = 25.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 |
2204 |
16.0% |
0.1604076 |
| 2 |
Group 2 |
2245 |
16.3% |
0.1633916 |
| 3 |
Group 3 |
2276 |
16.6% |
0.1656477 |
| 4 |
Group 4 |
2336 |
17.0% |
0.1700146 |
| 5 |
Group 5 |
2274 |
16.6% |
0.1655022 |
| 6 |
Group 6 |
2405 |
17.5% |
0.1750364 |
r25_panel_1
|
Variable label:
|
Whether the respondent belongs to the group which was exposed to
[r25_hecor], [r25_hecob], and [r25_hecvax]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1802] [Invalid:11938]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was asked [r25_hecor], [r25_hecob], and [r25_hecvax] |
1802 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11938 |
|
NA |
r25_panel_2
|
Variable label:
|
Whether the respondent belongs to the group which was exposed to
[r25_dvshpx]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1750] [Invalid:11990]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was asked [r25_dvshpx] |
1750 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11990 |
|
NA |
r25_interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r25_interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12921] [Invalid:819]
[Range:-]
|
r25_browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Technical description:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r25_browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Technical description:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r25_mobil
|
Variable label:
|
Determines if the respondents uses mobile
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determines if the respondents uses mobile
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
7087 |
51.6% |
0.5157933 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
6653 |
48.4% |
0.4842067 |
r25_opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Technical description:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r25_enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
Determines respondents device type
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determines respondents device type
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
7087 |
51.6% |
0.515793304 |
| 2 |
Touch |
6582 |
47.9% |
0.479039301 |
| 3 |
Generic |
71 |
0.5% |
0.005167394 |
r25_advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r25_getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Technical description:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r25_cecmo
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the term “climate change”?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the term “climate change”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses
are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if
you prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_cewinx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent is exposed to
[r25_cewinx1] or [r25_cewinx2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2242] [Invalid:11498]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Exposed to r25cewinx1 |
1136 |
50.7% |
0.5066905 |
| 2 |
Exposed to r25cewinx2 |
1106 |
49.3% |
0.4933095 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11498 |
|
NA |
r25_cewinx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cewinx1]
and [r25_cewinx2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2242] [Invalid:11498]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
onshore |
1117 |
49.8% |
0.4982159 |
| 2 |
offshore |
1125 |
50.2% |
0.5017841 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11498 |
|
NA |
r25_cewinx1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More wind power should be developed [r25_cewinx_ran2] in
Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree
with this?
|
|
Literal question:
|
More [r25_cewinx_ran2] should be developed in Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25cewinx_ran1 = 1 & r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
174 |
15.3% |
0.15316901 |
| 2 |
Agree |
309 |
27.2% |
0.27200704 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
239 |
21.0% |
0.21038732 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
81 |
7.1% |
0.07130282 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
98 |
8.6% |
0.08626761 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
113 |
9.9% |
0.09947183 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
122 |
10.7% |
0.10739437 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12604 |
|
NA |
r25_cewinx2
|
Variable label:
|
Your assessment: A majority or minority in Norway who believe that more
[r25_cewinx_ran2] wind power should be developed in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your assessment:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is there a majority or minority in Norway who believe that more
[r25_cewinx_ran2] wind power should be developed in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25cewinx_ran1 = 2 & r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A majority |
475 |
42.9% |
0.429475588 |
| 2 |
A minority |
623 |
56.3% |
0.563291139 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.7% |
0.007233273 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12634 |
|
NA |
r25_dvshpx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment: Assigns the same element for textpiping as in wave 24, based
on [r24_dvshaxran1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25panel_2 = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1750] [Invalid:11990]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Muslim women, however, refused to shake hands with politicians who were men |
860 |
49.1% |
0.4914286 |
| 2 |
Muslim men, however, refused to shake hands with politicians who were women |
890 |
50.9% |
0.5085714 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11990 |
|
NA |
r25_dvshpx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment: Assigns the same element for textpiping as in wave 24, based
on [r24_dvshaxran2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25panel_2 = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1750] [Invalid:11990]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
893 |
51.0% |
0.5102857 |
| 2 |
Instead they put their hand on their heart as a greeting. |
857 |
49.0% |
0.4897143 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11990 |
|
NA |
r25_dvshpx
|
Variable label:
|
Your assessment: A majority or minority in Norway in favour of local
politicans requested that everyone have to shake hands
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that some local politicians were invited by a local Muslim
community centre to attend their annual spring festival. When they
arrived the local politicians put out their hands to greet their hosts.
[r25_dvshpx_ran1]. [r25_dvshpx_ran2] After the meeting, some of those
who had attended expressed their discomfort about the situation and
requested that all the participants should shake hands the next time
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your assessment: Is there a majority or minority in Norway in
favour of local politicians making such a request?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25panel_2 = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A majority |
767 |
43.8% |
0.438285714 |
| 2 |
A minority |
966 |
55.2% |
0.552000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.0% |
0.009714286 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11990 |
|
NA |
r25_liint
|
Variable label:
|
Norwegian or english: language the respondent indicated they would be
able to respond in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The next part of the survey is part of an international study where we
would like to ask some of the participants some questions in English.
Exactly who will be asked these questions is a random decision.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you like to answer some questions in English if you are picked for
this group?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I can answer some questions in English |
1657 |
73.8% |
0.738084633 |
| 2 |
No, I don't want any questions in English |
576 |
25.7% |
0.256570156 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005345212 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_li_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects what questions the respondent will be exposed to
starting with [r25_lihap] and [r25_lisat], dependent on answer given in
[r25_liint]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Conditonal randomisation if the respondent was exposed to
Norwegian or English versions of the questions. If [r25_li_ran] == 1 it
was randomised across Norwegian and English versions. If [r25_li_ran] ==
2 | 3 | 4 it was randomised between Norwegian versions of the
questions.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2242] [Invalid:11498]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Exposed to lihapx & lisatx |
701 |
31.3% |
0.3126673 |
| 2 |
Exposed to lihapx1 & lisatx1 |
419 |
18.7% |
0.1868867 |
| 3 |
Exposed to lihapx2 & lisatx2 |
692 |
30.9% |
0.3086530 |
| 4 |
Exposed to lihapx3 & lisatx3 |
430 |
19.2% |
0.1917930 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11498 |
|
NA |
r25_lihapx
|
Variable label:
|
How happy would you say you are?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taking all things together, how happy would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Order of [r25lihapx] and [r25lisatx] is randomized.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very happy |
115 |
16.4% |
0.164051355 |
| 2 |
Rather happy |
468 |
66.8% |
0.667617689 |
| 3 |
Not very happy |
106 |
15.1% |
0.151212553 |
| 4 |
Not at all happy |
5 |
0.7% |
0.007132668 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
1.0% |
0.009985735 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13039 |
|
NA |
r25_lisatx
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with your life?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole
nowadays?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Questions for the international study on luck and satisfaction are now
concluded, and the survey will continue to other themes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Order of [r25lihapx] and [r25lisatx] is randomized.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
154 |
22.0% |
0.219686163 |
| 2 |
Rather satisfied |
463 |
66.0% |
0.660485021 |
| 3 |
Not very satisfied |
71 |
10.1% |
0.101283880 |
| 4 |
Not at all satisfied |
7 |
1.0% |
0.009985735 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.9% |
0.008559201 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13039 |
|
NA |
r25_lihapx1
|
Variable label:
|
How happy would you say you are?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taking all things together, how happy would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Order of [r25lihapx1] and [r25lisatx1] is randomized.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very happy |
92 |
22.0% |
0.219570406 |
| 2 |
Rather happy |
278 |
66.3% |
0.663484487 |
| 3 |
Not very happy |
40 |
9.5% |
0.095465394 |
| 4 |
Not at all happy |
6 |
1.4% |
0.014319809 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.7% |
0.007159905 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13321 |
|
NA |
r25_lisatx1
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with your life?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole
nowadays?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Questions for the international study on luck and satisfaction are now
concluded, and the survey will continue to other themes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Order of [r25lihapx1] and [r25lisatx1] is randomized.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
118 |
28.2% |
0.281622912 |
| 2 |
Rather satisfied |
247 |
58.9% |
0.589498807 |
| 3 |
Not very satisfied |
44 |
10.5% |
0.105011933 |
| 4 |
Not at all satisfied |
7 |
1.7% |
0.016706444 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.7% |
0.007159905 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13321 |
|
NA |
r25_lihapx2
|
Variable label:
|
How happy would you say you are?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taking all things together, how happy would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Order of [r25lihapx2] and [r25lisatx2] is randomized.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Extremely unhappy |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004335260 |
| 1 |
1 |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002890173 |
| 2 |
2 |
5 |
0.7% |
0.007225434 |
| 3 |
3 |
20 |
2.9% |
0.028901734 |
| 4 |
4 |
36 |
5.2% |
0.052023121 |
| 5 |
5 |
88 |
12.7% |
0.127167630 |
| 6 |
6 |
92 |
13.3% |
0.132947977 |
| 7 |
7 |
162 |
23.4% |
0.234104046 |
| 8 |
8 |
186 |
26.9% |
0.268786127 |
| 9 |
9 |
72 |
10.4% |
0.104046243 |
| 10 |
10 - Extremely happy |
19 |
2.7% |
0.027456647 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
1.0% |
0.010115607 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13048 |
|
NA |
r25_lisatx2
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with your life?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole
nowadays?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Questions for the international study on luck and satisfaction are now
concluded, and the survey will continue to other themes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Order of [r25lihapx2] and [r25lisatx2] is randomized.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Extremely dissatisfied |
4 |
0.6% |
0.005780347 |
| 1 |
1 |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004335260 |
| 2 |
2 |
4 |
0.6% |
0.005780347 |
| 3 |
3 |
18 |
2.6% |
0.026011561 |
| 4 |
4 |
31 |
4.5% |
0.044797688 |
| 5 |
5 |
78 |
11.3% |
0.112716763 |
| 6 |
6 |
90 |
13.0% |
0.130057803 |
| 7 |
7 |
163 |
23.6% |
0.235549133 |
| 8 |
8 |
196 |
28.3% |
0.283236994 |
| 9 |
9 |
70 |
10.1% |
0.101156069 |
| 10 |
10 - Extremely satisfied |
26 |
3.8% |
0.037572254 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.3% |
0.013005780 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13048 |
|
NA |
r25_lihapx3
|
Variable label:
|
How happy would you say you are?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taking all things together, how happy would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Order of [r25lihapx3] and [r25lisatx3] is randomized.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Extremely unhappy |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002325581 |
| 1 |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 2 |
2 |
5 |
1.2% |
0.011627907 |
| 3 |
3 |
10 |
2.3% |
0.023255814 |
| 4 |
4 |
10 |
2.3% |
0.023255814 |
| 5 |
5 |
30 |
7.0% |
0.069767442 |
| 6 |
6 |
63 |
14.7% |
0.146511628 |
| 7 |
7 |
111 |
25.8% |
0.258139535 |
| 8 |
8 |
130 |
30.2% |
0.302325581 |
| 9 |
9 |
56 |
13.0% |
0.130232558 |
| 10 |
10 - Extremely happy |
12 |
2.8% |
0.027906977 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004651163 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13310 |
|
NA |
r25_lisatx3
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with your life as a whole nowadays?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole
nowadays?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Questions for the international study on luck and satisfaction are now
concluded, and the survey will continue to other themes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Order of [r25lihapx3] and [r25lisatx3] is randomized.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Extremely dissatisfied |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 1 |
1 |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004651163 |
| 2 |
2 |
6 |
1.4% |
0.013953488 |
| 3 |
3 |
16 |
3.7% |
0.037209302 |
| 4 |
4 |
8 |
1.9% |
0.018604651 |
| 5 |
5 |
32 |
7.4% |
0.074418605 |
| 6 |
6 |
55 |
12.8% |
0.127906977 |
| 7 |
7 |
88 |
20.5% |
0.204651163 |
| 8 |
8 |
149 |
34.7% |
0.346511628 |
| 9 |
9 |
54 |
12.6% |
0.125581395 |
| 10 |
10 - Extremely satisfied |
18 |
4.2% |
0.041860465 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004651163 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13310 |
|
NA |
r25_dvcrmx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r25_dvcrmx_ran2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2242] [Invalid:11498]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
criticise |
765 |
34.1% |
0.3412132 |
| 2 |
discuss |
719 |
32.1% |
0.3206958 |
| 3 |
preach |
758 |
33.8% |
0.3380910 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11498 |
|
NA |
r25_dvcrmx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects and element for textpiping in pre-question
text to [r25_dvcrmx1] and [r25_dvcrmx2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2242] [Invalid:11498]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A group of Muslims have asked to hire a local meeting hall in order to hold a
meeting where they can [r25_dvcrmx_ran1] conservative ideas about bringing up
children in the Islamic faith. |
1145 |
51.1% |
0.5107047 |
| 2 |
A group of Christians have asked to hire a local meeting hall in order to hold
a meeting where they can [r25_dvcrmx_ran1] conservative Christian ideas about
bringing up children. |
1097 |
48.9% |
0.4892953 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11498 |
|
NA |
r25_dvcrmx1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Should they be allowed to rent the local meeting hall
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[r25_dvcrmx_ran2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be allowed to
rent the local meeting hall?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Displayed on the same page as [r25_dvcrmx2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
276 |
12.3% |
0.122939866 |
| 2 |
Agree |
615 |
27.4% |
0.273942094 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
251 |
11.2% |
0.111804009 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
401 |
17.9% |
0.178619154 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
237 |
10.6% |
0.105567929 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
269 |
12.0% |
0.119821826 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
191 |
8.5% |
0.085077951 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002227171 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvcrmx2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: the religious group poses a threat to Norwegian values
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[r25_dvcrmx_ran2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that the religious group
described above poses a threat to Norwegian values?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Displayed on the same page as [r25_dvcrmx1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
162 |
7.2% |
0.072160356 |
| 2 |
Agree |
329 |
14.7% |
0.146547884 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
534 |
23.8% |
0.237861915 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
479 |
21.3% |
0.213363029 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
242 |
10.8% |
0.107795100 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
350 |
15.6% |
0.155902004 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
134 |
6.0% |
0.059688196 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.7% |
0.006681514 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvsmex_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvsmex]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2242] [Invalid:11498]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
should no longer serve meals containing meat in order to limit climate change. |
251 |
11.2% |
0.1119536 |
| 2 |
should serve more meals containing no meat in order to limit climate change. |
253 |
11.3% |
0.1128457 |
| 3 |
should serve more meals containing no meat in order to limit climate change. The
cost per meal would then increase by up to NOK 10. |
253 |
11.3% |
0.1128457 |
| 4 |
should no longer serve meals containing pork in order to accommodate Muslim
religious rules. |
245 |
10.9% |
0.1092774 |
| 5 |
should serve more meals not containing pork in order to accommodate Muslim
religious rules. |
246 |
11.0% |
0.1097235 |
| 6 |
should serve more meals not containing pork in order to accommodate Muslim
religious rules. The cost per meal would then increase by up to NOK 10. |
275 |
12.3% |
0.1226583 |
| 7 |
should no longer serve meals containing meat in order to accommodate different
needs and preferences. |
248 |
11.1% |
0.1106155 |
| 8 |
should serve more meals containing no meat in order to accommodate different
needs and preferences. |
242 |
10.8% |
0.1079393 |
| 9 |
should serve more meals containing no meat in order to accommodate different
needs and preferences. The cost per meal would then increase by up to NOK 10. |
229 |
10.2% |
0.1021409 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11498 |
|
NA |
r25_dvsmex
|
Variable label:
|
In favour for/opposed to: It has been proposed that public canteens
[r25_dvsmex_ran]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
It has been proposed that public canteens [r25_dvsmex_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you in favour of or opposed to this proposal?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely in favour |
464 |
20.7% |
0.20668151 |
| 2 |
Somewhat in favour |
609 |
27.1% |
0.27126949 |
| 3 |
Somewhat opposed |
441 |
19.6% |
0.19643653 |
| 4 |
Completely opposed |
717 |
31.9% |
0.31937639 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.00623608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhodx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvhodx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2241] [Invalid:11499]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
International Women's Day |
1055 |
47.1% |
0.470772 |
| 2 |
A Muslim public holiday |
1186 |
52.9% |
0.529228 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11499 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhodx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvhodx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2241] [Invalid:11499]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
569 |
25.4% |
0.2539045 |
| 2 |
Some experts argue that this would have a positive impact on the economy because
people spend more money on their days off. |
553 |
24.7% |
0.2467648 |
| 3 |
Some experts argue that this would have a negative impact on the economy because
people work less. |
563 |
25.1% |
0.2512271 |
| 4 |
The new public holiday would replace one of the days off associated with a
Christian holiday. |
556 |
24.8% |
0.2481035 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11499 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhodx
|
Variable label:
|
In favour for/opposed to: [r25_dvhodx_ran1] is made a new public holiday
for everyone
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about the following proposal:
[r25_dvhodx_ran1] is made a new public holiday for everyone.
[r25_dvhodx_ran2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you in favour of or opposed to this proposal?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely in favour |
229 |
10.2% |
0.10200445 |
| 2 |
Somewhat in favour |
402 |
17.9% |
0.17906459 |
| 3 |
Somewhat opposed |
559 |
24.9% |
0.24899777 |
| 4 |
Completely opposed |
1027 |
45.7% |
0.45746102 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.01247216 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvnmox_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvnmox]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2239] [Invalid:11501]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
750 |
33.5% |
0.3349710 |
| 2 |
Their present one is small and run-down. |
745 |
33.3% |
0.3327378 |
| 3 |
The one they have is similar to this one: [image] |
744 |
33.2% |
0.3322912 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11501 |
|
NA |
r25_dvnmox_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvnmox]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2239] [Invalid:11501]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
736 |
32.9% |
0.3287182 |
| 2 |
The new mosque would have a bit more space and be more presentable. |
766 |
34.2% |
0.3421170 |
| 3 |
The new mosque would resemble this one: [image] |
737 |
32.9% |
0.3291648 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11501 |
|
NA |
r25_dvnmox
|
Variable label:
|
In favour for/opposed to: a local muslim association proposes building a
new mosque
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
A local Muslim association proposes building a new mosque.
[r25_dvnmox_ran1]
[r25_dvnmox_ran2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you in favour of or opposed to building a new mosque?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely in favour |
512 |
22.8% |
0.22806236 |
| 2 |
Somewhat in favour |
843 |
37.6% |
0.37550111 |
| 3 |
Somewhat opposed |
487 |
21.7% |
0.21692650 |
| 4 |
Completely opposed |
376 |
16.7% |
0.16748330 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.2% |
0.01202673 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvfinx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvfinx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2238] [Invalid:11502]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Christian |
1177 |
52.6% |
0.525916 |
| 2 |
Muslim |
1061 |
47.4% |
0.474084 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11502 |
|
NA |
r25_dvfinx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvfinx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2238] [Invalid:11502]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
no formal education |
1113 |
49.7% |
0.497319 |
| 2 |
university education |
1125 |
50.3% |
0.502681 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11502 |
|
NA |
r25_dvfinx_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvfinx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2238] [Invalid:11502]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
He is not religious, never attends a [r25_dvfinx_pipe1] and never prays at home. |
753 |
33.6% |
0.3364611 |
| 2 |
He is religious, attends a [r25_dvfinx_pipe1] and prays at home. |
728 |
32.5% |
0.3252904 |
| 3 |
He is very religious and believes that there is only a correct interpretation of
[r25_dvfinxpipe2] and that is more important to him than Norwegian laws. |
757 |
33.8% |
0.3382484 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11502 |
|
NA |
r25_dvfinx
|
Variable label:
|
Cold/hot feelings: Immigrants from Syria
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are now interested in what you think about immigrants.
Consider an immigrant from Syria who is a 30-year-old [r25_dvfinx_ran1]
man. He has [r25_dvfinx_ran2]. [r25_dvfinx_ran3]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please state below how hot or cold your feelings are when you hear about
this man.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Placing the arrow between 50 and 100 degrees indicates that you
generally have warm feelings. Placing the arrow between 0 and 50 degrees
indicates that you generally have cold feelings. If you have neither hot
nor cold feelings, you can place the arrow at 50 degrees.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[The respondent registered their answer by using a slider]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2168] [Invalid:11572]
[Range:0-100]
|
r25_cehow
|
Variable label:
|
Level of worry that extreme weather or the consequences of climate
change will cause damage to your home
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you worried that extreme weather or the consequences of climate
change will cause damage to your home?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all concerned |
913 |
40.7% |
0.40668151 |
| 2 |
Slightly concerned |
1044 |
46.5% |
0.46503341 |
| 3 |
Fairly concerned |
187 |
8.3% |
0.08329621 |
| 4 |
Very concerned |
87 |
3.9% |
0.03875278 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.00623608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_ceres_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for protecting us from future consequences of climate
change: The municipalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The municipalities
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Pre-question text was highlighet in gray for the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1338 |
59.6% |
0.59599109 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
893 |
39.8% |
0.39777283 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.00623608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_ceres_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for protecting us from future consequences of climate
change: The state
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The state
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Pre-question text was highlighet in gray for the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1986 |
88.5% |
0.88463252 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
245 |
10.9% |
0.10913140 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.00623608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_ceres_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for protecting us from future consequences of climate
change: Private trade and industry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Private trade and industry
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Pre-question text was highlighet in gray for the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
699 |
31.1% |
0.31135857 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1532 |
68.2% |
0.68240535 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.00623608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_ceres_4
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for protecting us from future consequences of climate
change: Private households
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Private households
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Pre-question text was highlighet in gray for the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
848 |
37.8% |
0.37772829 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1383 |
61.6% |
0.61603563 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.00623608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_ceres_5
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for protecting us from future consequences of climate
change: NGOs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
NGOs
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Pre-question text was highlighet in gray for the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
271 |
12.1% |
0.12071269 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1960 |
87.3% |
0.87305122 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.00623608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_ceres_6
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for protecting us from future consequences of climate
change: Don’t know
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t know
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Pre-question text was highlighet in gray for the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
113 |
5.0% |
0.05033408 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
2118 |
94.3% |
0.94342984 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.00623608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_bghom
|
Variable label:
|
What is your living situation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your living situation?
|
|
Post-question:
|
In this context we are thinking about your primary residence.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I live in a detached house |
1218 |
54.3% |
0.54253898 |
| 2 |
I live in semi-detached/multi-family house, terraced house or another type of
small house |
482 |
21.5% |
0.21469933 |
| 3 |
I live in a block of flats |
479 |
21.3% |
0.21336303 |
| 4 |
Other: |
45 |
2.0% |
0.02004454 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.9% |
0.00935412 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_bghom_4_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: What is your living situation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other: What is your living situation?
|
|
Post-question:
|
In this context we are thinking about your primary residence.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_bghow_1
|
Variable label:
|
Own or rent primary residence: I own my home, in full or in part
|
|
Literal question:
|
I own my home, in full or in part
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1984 |
88.4% |
0.88374165 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
247 |
11.0% |
0.11002227 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.00623608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_bghow_2
|
Variable label:
|
Own or rent primary residence: I am renting my home
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am renting my home
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
192 |
8.6% |
0.08552339 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
2039 |
90.8% |
0.90824053 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.00623608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_bghow_3
|
Variable label:
|
Own or rent primary residence: Other:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
47 |
2.1% |
0.02093541 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
2184 |
97.3% |
0.97282851 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.00623608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_bghow_3_other
|
Variable label:
|
Own or rent primary residence: Other:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_cewme
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: you can take measures that help protect yourself and
your property against the consequences of climate change
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that you can take measures that
help protect yourself and your property against the consequences of
climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
338 |
15.1% |
0.150556793 |
| 2 |
Agree |
731 |
32.6% |
0.325612472 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
597 |
26.6% |
0.265924276 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
305 |
13.6% |
0.135857461 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
93 |
4.1% |
0.041425390 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
122 |
5.4% |
0.054342984 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
40 |
1.8% |
0.017817372 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.8% |
0.008463252 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_ceome_1
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall,
flooding and storm water: Not relevant to my housing situation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and
storm water.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Not relevant to my housing situation
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such
measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your
choice of measures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
599 |
29.3% |
0.293483586 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1438 |
70.5% |
0.704556590 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001959824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11699 |
|
NA |
r25_ceome_2
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall,
flooding and storm water: Information about my residential area being
particularly vulnerable to flooding or storm water
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and
storm water.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Information about my residential area being particularly vulnerable to
flooding or storm water
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such
measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your
choice of measures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
732 |
35.9% |
0.358647722 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1305 |
63.9% |
0.639392455 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001959824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11699 |
|
NA |
r25_ceome_3
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall,
flooding and storm water: Information about the typical damage costs
incurred by those affected by flooding or storm water
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and
storm water.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Information about the typical damage costs incurred by those affected by
flooding or storm water
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such
measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your
choice of measures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
304 |
14.9% |
0.148946595 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1733 |
84.9% |
0.849093582 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001959824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11699 |
|
NA |
r25_ceome_4
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall,
flooding and storm water: Information about what measures could be taken
in order to reduce the risks
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and
storm water.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Information about what measures could be taken in order to reduce the
risks
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such
measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your
choice of measures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1043 |
51.1% |
0.511024008 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
994 |
48.7% |
0.487016169 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001959824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11699 |
|
NA |
r25_ceome_5
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall,
flooding and storm water: The fact that the implementation of measures
ensures better insurance terms
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and
storm water.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The fact that the implementation of measures ensures better insurance
terms
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such
measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your
choice of measures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
628 |
30.8% |
0.307692308 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1409 |
69.0% |
0.690347869 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001959824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11699 |
|
NA |
r25_ceome_6
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall,
flooding and storm water: Information about the cost of measures
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and
storm water.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Information about the cost of measures
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such
measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your
choice of measures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
575 |
28.2% |
0.281724645 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1462 |
71.6% |
0.716315532 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001959824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11699 |
|
NA |
r25_ceome_7
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall,
flooding and storm water: Financial support schemes for measures
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and
storm water.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Financial support schemes for measures
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such
measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your
choice of measures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
832 |
40.8% |
0.407643312 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1205 |
59.0% |
0.590396864 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001959824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11699 |
|
NA |
r25_ceome_8
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall,
flooding and storm water: I do not wish to implement such measures at my
property
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and
storm water.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I do not wish to implement such measures at my property
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such
measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your
choice of measures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
41 |
2.0% |
0.020088192 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1996 |
97.8% |
0.977951984 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001959824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11699 |
|
NA |
r25_ceome_9
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall,
flooding and storm water: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and
storm water.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such
measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your
choice of measures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
44 |
2.2% |
0.021558060 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1993 |
97.6% |
0.976482117 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001959824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11699 |
|
NA |
r25_ceome_9_other
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall,
flooding and storm water: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and
storm water.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such
measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your
choice of measures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in
r25_bghow]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_ceome_10
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall,
flooding and storm water: Don’t know
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and
storm water.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t know
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such
measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your
choice of measures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
55 |
2.7% |
0.026947575 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1982 |
97.1% |
0.971092602 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001959824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11699 |
|
NA |
r25_dvgevx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvgevx2]
and [r25_dvgevx1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2225] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
a local group from the Progress Party (FrP) |
1106 |
49.7% |
0.4970787 |
| 2 |
the anti-Islamic group Stop the Islamisation of Norway (SIAN) |
1119 |
50.3% |
0.5029213 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11515 |
|
NA |
r25_dvgevx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvgevx2] and
[r25_dvgevx1]. Randomly selects an element if [r25_dvgevx_ran1] == 2. If
[r25_dvgevx_ran1] == 1, element 1 or 3 is selected by random.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. If [r25_dvgevx_ran1] == 1 it was conditionally randomised
between 1 and 3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2225] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
criticise Islam |
903 |
40.6% |
0.4058427 |
| 2 |
provoke Muslims |
363 |
16.3% |
0.1631461 |
| 3 |
criticise conservative Islamic attitudes about homosexuality |
959 |
43.1% |
0.4310112 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11515 |
|
NA |
r25_dvgevx2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: [r25_dvgevx_ran1]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider that [r25_dvgevx_ran1] wants to hold an event in order to
[r25_dvgevx_ran2].
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike denne gruppen?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Displayed on the same page as [r25_dvgevx1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely like |
35 |
1.6% |
0.01559020 |
| 2 |
Really like |
65 |
2.9% |
0.02895323 |
| 3 |
Like somewhat |
137 |
6.1% |
0.06102450 |
| 4 |
Neither like nor dislike |
426 |
19.0% |
0.18975501 |
| 5 |
Dislike somewhat |
335 |
14.9% |
0.14922049 |
| 6 |
Really dislike |
484 |
21.6% |
0.21559020 |
| 7 |
Intensely dislike |
735 |
32.7% |
0.32739421 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.01247216 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvgevx1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: [r25_dvgevx_ran1] should be allowed to hold the event
about [r25_dvgevx_ran2]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider that [r25_dvgevx_ran1] wants to hold an event in order to
[r25_dvgevx_ran2].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be allowed to
do so?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Displayed on the same page as [r25_dvgevx2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
224 |
10.0% |
0.09977728 |
| 2 |
Agree |
475 |
21.2% |
0.21158129 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
363 |
16.2% |
0.16169265 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
341 |
15.2% |
0.15189310 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
253 |
11.3% |
0.11269488 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
274 |
12.2% |
0.12204900 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
280 |
12.5% |
0.12472160 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.6% |
0.01559020 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvmcs_1
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Dramatically stricter sentences for criminals
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Dramatically stricter sentences for criminals
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
432 |
19.2% |
0.19242762 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
662 |
29.5% |
0.29487751 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
654 |
29.1% |
0.29131403 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
346 |
15.4% |
0.15412027 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
122 |
5.4% |
0.05434298 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.3% |
0.01291759 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvmcs_2
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Reserve more parental leave days for the
father/co-mother
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reserve more parental leave days for the father/co-mother
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
144 |
6.4% |
0.06414254 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
431 |
19.2% |
0.19198218 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
944 |
42.0% |
0.42048998 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
428 |
19.1% |
0.19064588 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
259 |
11.5% |
0.11536748 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
39 |
1.7% |
0.01737194 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvmcs_3
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Make more space for Christian cultural heritage in
Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Make more space for Christian cultural heritage in Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
242 |
10.8% |
0.10779510 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
500 |
22.3% |
0.22271715 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
813 |
36.2% |
0.36213808 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
417 |
18.6% |
0.18574610 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
247 |
11.0% |
0.11002227 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.2% |
0.01158129 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvmcs_4
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Work for a multicultural society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Work for a multicultural society
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
617 |
27.5% |
0.27483296 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
872 |
38.8% |
0.38841871 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
472 |
21.0% |
0.21024499 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
180 |
8.0% |
0.08017817 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
74 |
3.3% |
0.03296214 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01336303 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvmcs_5
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Increase the carbon tax on petrol and diesel
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase the carbon tax on petrol and diesel
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
229 |
10.2% |
0.10200445 |
| 2 |
Fairly good proposal |
428 |
19.1% |
0.19064588 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
490 |
21.8% |
0.21826281 |
| 4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
563 |
25.1% |
0.25077951 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
505 |
22.5% |
0.22494432 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01336303 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtra1
|
Variable label:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them
are quite correct?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Experiment. Random question order together with [r25_dvtra2],
[r25_dvtra], [r25_dvtra4]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To understand the world, we need to free ourselves from established traditions |
986 |
43.9% |
0.43919822 |
| 2 |
Established traditions provide us with the wisdom needed to understand the world |
1175 |
52.3% |
0.52338530 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
84 |
3.7% |
0.03741648 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtra2
|
Variable label:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them
are quite correct?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Experiment. Random question order together with [r25_dvtra1],
[r25_dvtra3], [r25_dvtra4]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
If an idea has been around for a long time, it probably needs to be updated |
1283 |
57.1% |
0.57149220 |
| 2 |
If an idea has been around for a long time, it probably contains wisdom |
883 |
39.3% |
0.39331849 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
79 |
3.5% |
0.03518931 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtra3
|
Variable label:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them
are quite correct?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Experiment. Random question order together with [r25_dvtra1],
[r25_dvtra2], [r25_dvtra4]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The world is constantly changing, so we should adjust our views about what is
the morally correct way of being |
1500 |
66.8% |
0.6681514 |
| 2 |
Even though the world is constantly changing, it would be wrong to adapt our
views about what is the morally correct way of being |
681 |
30.3% |
0.3033408 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
2.9% |
0.0285078 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtra4
|
Variable label:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them
are quite correct?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Experiment. Random question order together with [r25_dvtra1],
[r25_dvtra2], [r25_dvtra3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Traditions are often not worth following because they are discriminatory towards
unique peoples |
384 |
17.1% |
0.17104677 |
| 2 |
Traditions are often worth following because they connect us to our shared past |
1792 |
79.8% |
0.79821826 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
69 |
3.1% |
0.03073497 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvimc_1
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced
towards immigrants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced towards immigrants
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
523 |
23.3% |
0.232962138 |
| 2 |
Well |
848 |
37.8% |
0.377728285 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
393 |
17.5% |
0.175055679 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
311 |
13.9% |
0.138530067 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
80 |
3.6% |
0.035634744 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
38 |
1.7% |
0.016926503 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
19 |
0.8% |
0.008463252 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.5% |
0.014699332 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvimc_2
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you: I don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
575 |
25.6% |
0.256124722 |
| 2 |
Well |
795 |
35.4% |
0.354120267 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
333 |
14.8% |
0.148329621 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
368 |
16.4% |
0.163919822 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
81 |
3.6% |
0.036080178 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
42 |
1.9% |
0.018708241 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
17 |
0.8% |
0.007572383 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
1.5% |
0.015144766 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvimc_3
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you: I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
191 |
8.5% |
0.08507795 |
| 2 |
Well |
391 |
17.4% |
0.17416481 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
409 |
18.2% |
0.18218263 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
708 |
31.5% |
0.31536748 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
192 |
8.6% |
0.08552339 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
212 |
9.4% |
0.09443207 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
110 |
4.9% |
0.04899777 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.4% |
0.01425390 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvimc_4
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you: I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of my
own convictions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of my own
convictions
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
468 |
20.8% |
0.208463252 |
| 2 |
Well |
867 |
38.6% |
0.386191537 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
413 |
18.4% |
0.183964365 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
349 |
15.5% |
0.155456570 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
72 |
3.2% |
0.032071269 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
33 |
1.5% |
0.014699332 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005345212 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.4% |
0.013808463 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhsy_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important these considerations are for your own views on
immigration: Protecting people who are fleeing from their homeland.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what
considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway.
Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please
consider how important each of these considerations is for your own
views on immigration.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Protecting people who are fleeing from their homeland.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
1019 |
45.4% |
0.453897550 |
| 2 |
Important |
845 |
37.6% |
0.376391982 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
291 |
13.0% |
0.129621381 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
47 |
2.1% |
0.020935412 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
13 |
0.6% |
0.005790646 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.3% |
0.013363029 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhsy_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important these considerations are for your own views on
immigration: Securing labour for the Norwegian economy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what
considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway.
Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please
consider how important each of these considerations is for your own
views on immigration.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Securing labour for the Norwegian economy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
499 |
22.2% |
0.22227171 |
| 2 |
Important |
1013 |
45.1% |
0.45122494 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
516 |
23.0% |
0.22984410 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
133 |
5.9% |
0.05924276 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
38 |
1.7% |
0.01692650 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
2.0% |
0.02048998 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhsy_3
|
Variable label:
|
How important these considerations are for your own views on
immigration: Enriching cultural life of Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what
considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway.
Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please
consider how important each of these considerations is for your own
views on immigration.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Enriching cultural life of Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
365 |
16.3% |
0.16258352 |
| 2 |
Important |
810 |
36.1% |
0.36080178 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
606 |
27.0% |
0.26993318 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
315 |
14.0% |
0.14031180 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
104 |
4.6% |
0.04632517 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
2.0% |
0.02004454 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhsy_4
|
Variable label:
|
How important these considerations are for your own views on
immigration: Providing people with the opportunity to live and create a
life where they want.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what
considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway.
Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please
consider how important each of these considerations is for your own
views on immigration.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Providing people with the opportunity to live and create a life where
they want.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
472 |
21.0% |
0.21024499 |
| 2 |
Important |
918 |
40.9% |
0.40890869 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
570 |
25.4% |
0.25389755 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
186 |
8.3% |
0.08285078 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
55 |
2.4% |
0.02449889 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.0% |
0.01959911 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhsy_5
|
Variable label:
|
How important these considerations are for your own views on
immigration: Keeping criminals and violent people out of the country.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what
considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway.
Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please
consider how important each of these considerations is for your own
views on immigration.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Keeping criminals and violent people out of the country.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
985 |
43.9% |
0.43875278 |
| 2 |
Important |
660 |
29.4% |
0.29398664 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
365 |
16.3% |
0.16258352 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
151 |
6.7% |
0.06726058 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
39 |
1.7% |
0.01737194 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
2.0% |
0.02004454 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhsy_6
|
Variable label:
|
How important these considerations are for your own views on
immigration: Preventing the welfare system from being burdened at the
expense of those who are already living in Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what
considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway.
Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please
consider how important each of these considerations is for your own
views on immigration.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Preventing the welfare system from being burdened at the expense of
those who are already living in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
346 |
15.4% |
0.15412027 |
| 2 |
Important |
559 |
24.9% |
0.24899777 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
688 |
30.6% |
0.30645880 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
482 |
21.5% |
0.21469933 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
120 |
5.3% |
0.05345212 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
2.2% |
0.02227171 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhsy_7
|
Variable label:
|
How important these considerations are for your own views on
immigration: Protecting liberal Western values (such as gender equality)
from conservative mindsets.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what
considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway.
Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please
consider how important each of these considerations is for your own
views on immigration.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Protecting liberal Western values (such as gender equality) from
conservative mindsets.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
1012 |
45.1% |
0.45077951 |
| 2 |
Important |
720 |
32.1% |
0.32071269 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
283 |
12.6% |
0.12605791 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
131 |
5.8% |
0.05835189 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
49 |
2.2% |
0.02182628 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
2.2% |
0.02227171 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhsy_8
|
Variable label:
|
How important these considerations are for your own views on
immigration: Preserving Norwegian culture and Norway’s distinctive
character.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what
considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway.
Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please
consider how important each of these considerations is for your own
views on immigration.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Preserving Norwegian culture and Norway’s distinctive character.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
589 |
26.2% |
0.26236080 |
| 2 |
Important |
805 |
35.9% |
0.35857461 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
532 |
23.7% |
0.23697105 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
206 |
9.2% |
0.09175947 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
64 |
2.9% |
0.02850780 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
49 |
2.2% |
0.02182628 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhsy_9
|
Variable label:
|
How important these considerations are for your own views on
immigration: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what
considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway.
Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please
consider how important each of these considerations is for your own
views on immigration.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
93 |
4.1% |
0.041425390 |
| 2 |
Important |
69 |
3.1% |
0.030734967 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
81 |
3.6% |
0.036080178 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005345212 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
42 |
1.9% |
0.018708241 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1948 |
86.8% |
0.867706013 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11495 |
|
NA |
r25_dvhsy_9_other
|
Variable label:
|
How important these considerations are for your own views on
immigration: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what
considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway.
Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please
consider how important each of these considerations is for your own
views on immigration.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_cehyo
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the term «hydrogen»?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You will now be exposed to a question where you should answer based on
your associations
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the term «hydrogen»?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses
are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if
you prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_dvcla
|
Variable label:
|
How many of the pupils in your school class had parents who were
immigrants or had immigrated to Norway themselves
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think back to when you were 15 years old
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many of the pupils in your school class had parents who were
immigrants or had immigrated to Norway themselves?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
4502 |
65.4% |
0.6537902992 |
| 2 |
One or just a few |
1718 |
24.9% |
0.2494917223 |
| 3 |
Less than half |
195 |
2.8% |
0.0283183270 |
| 4 |
Half |
30 |
0.4% |
0.0043566657 |
| 5 |
More than half |
13 |
0.2% |
0.0018878885 |
| 6 |
Almost all |
9 |
0.1% |
0.0013069997 |
| 7 |
All |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0001452222 |
| 8 |
I didn’t attend school when I was 15 years old |
32 |
0.5% |
0.0046471101 |
| 9 |
I didn’t live in Norway when I was 15 years old |
373 |
5.4% |
0.0541678769 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.2% |
0.0018878885 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6854 |
|
NA |
r25_dvfrf
|
Variable label:
|
Among your friends when you were 15, how many had parents who were
immigrants or had immigrated to Norway themselves
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Once again, think back to when you were 15 years old.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Among your friends (people you trusted and could tell a secret to), how
many had parents who were immigrants or had immigrated to Norway
themselves?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
5439 |
79.0% |
0.789863491 |
| 1 |
1 |
673 |
9.8% |
0.097734534 |
| 2 |
2 |
217 |
3.2% |
0.031513215 |
| 3 |
3 |
71 |
1.0% |
0.010310775 |
| 4 |
4 |
26 |
0.4% |
0.003775777 |
| 5 |
5 or more |
40 |
0.6% |
0.005808888 |
| 6 |
I didn’t live in Norway when I was 15 years old |
388 |
5.6% |
0.056346210 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.5% |
0.004647110 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6854 |
|
NA |
r25_dvfrn
|
Variable label:
|
Among your current friendships, how many have parents who are immigrants
or have immigrated to Norway themselves?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your current friendships
|
|
Literal question:
|
Among your friends (people you trust and can share private thoughts and
feelings with), how many have parents who are immigrants or have
immigrated to Norway themselves?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
3847 |
55.9% |
0.558669765 |
| 1 |
1 |
1169 |
17.0% |
0.169764740 |
| 2 |
2 |
768 |
11.2% |
0.111530642 |
| 3 |
3 |
368 |
5.3% |
0.053441766 |
| 4 |
4 |
140 |
2.0% |
0.020331107 |
| 5 |
5 or more |
531 |
7.7% |
0.077112983 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
0.9% |
0.009148998 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6854 |
|
NA |
r25_headv_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent will be exposed to
[r25_headv], [r25_headv1], or [r25_headv2].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2269] [Invalid:11471]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Exposed to [r25_headv] |
734 |
32.3% |
0.3234905 |
| 2 |
Exposed to [r25_headv1] |
808 |
35.6% |
0.3561040 |
| 3 |
Exposed to [r25_headv2] |
727 |
32.0% |
0.3204055 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11471 |
|
NA |
r25_headv
|
Variable label:
|
Awareness of lifestyle- and health-advice provided by health authorities
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you aware of the advice provided by the health authorities about
lifestyle and health, such as advice about diet/nutrition or
recommendations about flu vaccines?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_headv_ran = 1 & r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
699 |
95.2% |
0.952316076 |
| 2 |
No |
32 |
4.4% |
0.043596730 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004087193 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13006 |
|
NA |
r25_headv1
|
Variable label:
|
Awareness of lifestyle- and health-advice provided by health authorities
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you familiar with the lifestyle and health advice provided by the
health authorities?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_headv_ran = 2 & r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
707 |
87.5% |
0.875000000 |
| 2 |
No |
100 |
12.4% |
0.123762376 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001237624 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12932 |
|
NA |
r25_headv2
|
Variable label:
|
Awareness of lifestyle- and health-advice provided by health authorities
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you familiar with the lifestyle and health advice provided by the
health authorities, such as advice about diet/nutrition or
recommendations about the use of antibiotics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_headv_ran = 3 & r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
654 |
90.0% |
0.899587345 |
| 2 |
No |
71 |
9.8% |
0.097661623 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002751032 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13013 |
|
NA |
r25_heant
|
Variable label:
|
What does antibiotics work for
|
|
Literal question:
|
What does antibiotics work for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Bacterial infections |
2111 |
92.8% |
0.927504394 |
| 2 |
Viral infections |
109 |
4.8% |
0.047891037 |
| 3 |
All types of disease |
19 |
0.8% |
0.008347979 |
| 4 |
Do not know |
20 |
0.9% |
0.008787346 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.7% |
0.007469244 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heant_seen
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Records whether the respondent has been exposed to
[r25_heant]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2268] [Invalid:11472]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Seen [r25_heant] |
2268 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11472 |
|
NA |
r25_heant_back
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Records whether the respondent has navigated bact to
[r25_heant] after being exposed to it and navigated past the question.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:83] [Invalid:13657]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent has navigated back to [r25_heant] |
83 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13657 |
|
NA |
r25_heant_originalvalue
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. The first answer given by the respondent in [r25_heant]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If the respondent has not changed answers in [r25_heant] the values in
[r25_heant_originalvalue] will be identical. If the respondent has
changed answer in [r25_heant], [r25_heant_originalvalue] will show what
the respondents’ intial answer was.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2259] [Invalid:11481]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Bacterial infections |
2068 |
91.5% |
0.915449314 |
| 2 |
Viral infections |
149 |
6.6% |
0.065958389 |
| 3 |
All types of disease |
21 |
0.9% |
0.009296149 |
| 4 |
Do not know |
21 |
0.9% |
0.009296149 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11481 |
|
NA |
r25_heanw_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_heanw]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2268] [Invalid:11472]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
antibiotic resistance |
1132 |
49.9% |
0.4991182 |
| 2 |
antibiotics losing their effect |
1136 |
50.1% |
0.5008818 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11472 |
|
NA |
r25_heanw
|
Variable label:
|
Concerned that [r25_heanw_ran] losing its effect
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Antibiotic resistance means that bacteria are resistant to antibiotics,
i.e. bacteria cannot be killed by these drugs. Bacterial resistance to
antibiotics is a growing problem.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about [r25_heanwran]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very worried |
491 |
21.6% |
0.215729350 |
| 2 |
Worried |
848 |
37.3% |
0.372583480 |
| 3 |
Somewhat worried |
662 |
29.1% |
0.290861160 |
| 4 |
Not very worried |
210 |
9.2% |
0.092267135 |
| 5 |
Not at all worried |
55 |
2.4% |
0.024165202 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004393673 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heans_pipe
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_heans1] -
[r25_heans3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r25_heanw_ran] == 1 value is set to 1. If [r25_heanw_ran] == 2
value is set to 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2268] [Invalid:11472]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
antibiotic resistance be... |
1132 |
49.9% |
0.4991182 |
| 2 |
it be if antibiotics lose their effect... |
1136 |
50.1% |
0.5008818 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11472 |
|
NA |
r25_heans_1
|
Variable label:
|
How serious will [r25_heans_pipe] losing its effect: for you
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How serious will [r25_heans_pipe]
|
|
Literal question:
|
… for you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
432 |
19.0% |
0.18980668 |
| 2 |
Serious |
628 |
27.6% |
0.27592267 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
604 |
26.5% |
0.26537786 |
| 4 |
Not very serious |
450 |
19.8% |
0.19771529 |
| 5 |
Not a threat |
131 |
5.8% |
0.05755712 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.4% |
0.01362039 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heans_2
|
Variable label:
|
How serious will [r25_heans_pipe] losing its effect: for Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How serious will [r25_heans_pipe]
|
|
Literal question:
|
… for Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
891 |
39.1% |
0.391476274 |
| 2 |
Serious |
903 |
39.7% |
0.396748682 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
340 |
14.9% |
0.149384886 |
| 4 |
Not very serious |
63 |
2.8% |
0.027680141 |
| 5 |
Not a threat |
17 |
0.7% |
0.007469244 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
62 |
2.7% |
0.027240773 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heans_3
|
Variable label:
|
How serious will [r25_heans_pipe] losing its effect: for the world
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How serious will [r25_heans_pipe]
|
|
Literal question:
|
… for the world?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
1589 |
69.8% |
0.698154657 |
| 2 |
Serious |
512 |
22.5% |
0.224956063 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
99 |
4.3% |
0.043497364 |
| 4 |
Not very serious |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004833040 |
| 5 |
Not a threat |
8 |
0.4% |
0.003514938 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
2.5% |
0.025043937 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heanm
|
Variable label:
|
Concerned about the risk of becoming infected by antibiotic-resistant
bacteria
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Once bacteria have become resistant they can continue to spread through
contact between humans, through contact between humans and animals or to
humans from water, food and the environment in general. The risk of
being infected by antibiotic-resistant bacteria is greatest when we stay
in areas where antibiotic resistance is widespread.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you sometimes worried about the risk of becoming infected by
antibiotic-resistant bacteria?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
902 |
39.6% |
0.396309315 |
| 2 |
No |
1358 |
59.7% |
0.596660808 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.7% |
0.007029877 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heanc
|
Variable label:
|
Are you ever worried about infecting others with antibiotic-resistant
bacteria
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you ever worried about infecting others with antibiotic-resistant
bacteria?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
372 |
16.3% |
0.163444640 |
| 2 |
No |
1883 |
82.7% |
0.827328647 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.9% |
0.009226714 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heanl_1
|
Variable label:
|
How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with
antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to: Nordic countries
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with
antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nordic countries
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002196837 |
| 2 |
Likely |
42 |
1.8% |
0.018453427 |
| 3 |
Fairly likely |
300 |
13.2% |
0.131810193 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
1670 |
73.4% |
0.733743409 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
231 |
10.1% |
0.101493849 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.012302285 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heanl_2
|
Variable label:
|
How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with
antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to: Great Britain
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with
antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Great Britain
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
19 |
0.8% |
0.008347979 |
| 2 |
Likely |
122 |
5.4% |
0.053602812 |
| 3 |
Fairly likely |
803 |
35.3% |
0.352811951 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
1180 |
51.8% |
0.518453427 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
105 |
4.6% |
0.046133568 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
47 |
2.1% |
0.020650264 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heanl_3
|
Variable label:
|
How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with
antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to: Southern Europe
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with
antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Southern Europe
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
63 |
2.8% |
0.02768014 |
| 2 |
Likely |
297 |
13.0% |
0.13049209 |
| 3 |
Fairly likely |
1172 |
51.5% |
0.51493849 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
645 |
28.3% |
0.28339192 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
62 |
2.7% |
0.02724077 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
1.6% |
0.01625659 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heanl_4
|
Variable label:
|
How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with
antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to: Eastern Europe
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with
antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Eastern Europe
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
123 |
5.4% |
0.05404218 |
| 2 |
Likely |
447 |
19.6% |
0.19639719 |
| 3 |
Fairly likely |
1101 |
48.4% |
0.48374341 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
511 |
22.5% |
0.22451670 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
57 |
2.5% |
0.02504394 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
1.6% |
0.01625659 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heank_1
|
Variable label:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: General
practitioner
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
General practitioner
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1070 |
47.0% |
0.470123023 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1196 |
52.5% |
0.525483304 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004393673 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heank_2
|
Variable label:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: Other health
professionals
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other health professionals
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
492 |
21.6% |
0.216168717 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1774 |
77.9% |
0.779437610 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004393673 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heank_3
|
Variable label:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: News media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
News media
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1247 |
54.8% |
0.547891037 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1019 |
44.8% |
0.447715290 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004393673 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heank_4
|
Variable label:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: Social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social media
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
257 |
11.3% |
0.112917399 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
2009 |
88.3% |
0.882688928 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004393673 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heank_5
|
Variable label:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: Official websites
(such as antibiotika.no, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, etc.)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Official websites (such as antibiotika.no, the Norwegian Institute of
Public Health, etc.)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1123 |
49.3% |
0.493409490 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1143 |
50.2% |
0.502196837 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004393673 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heank_6
|
Variable label:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: Friends and
acquaintances
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends and acquaintances
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
368 |
16.2% |
0.161687170 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1898 |
83.4% |
0.833919156 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004393673 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heank_7
|
Variable label:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
187 |
8.2% |
0.082161687 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
2079 |
91.3% |
0.913444640 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004393673 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heank_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_headc
|
Variable label:
|
The advice I receive about antibiotic use is easy to understand
|
|
Literal question:
|
The advice I receive about antibiotic use is easy to understand
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
448 |
19.7% |
0.196836555 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1061 |
46.6% |
0.466168717 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
306 |
13.4% |
0.134446397 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
241 |
10.6% |
0.105887522 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
38 |
1.7% |
0.016695958 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004393673 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001318102 |
| 8 |
I have never received or read any advice about antibiotic use |
151 |
6.6% |
0.066344464 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007908612 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_heaus_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_heaus]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2265] [Invalid:11475]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
during the last 5 years |
1140 |
50.3% |
0.5033113 |
| 2 |
the last year |
1125 |
49.7% |
0.4966887 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11475 |
|
NA |
r25_heaus
|
Variable label:
|
Used antibiotics [r25_heaus_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you ever taken antibiotics [r25_heausran]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
For example, as a pill, ointment, drops or intravenously.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
744 |
32.7% |
0.326889279 |
| 2 |
No |
1403 |
61.6% |
0.616432337 |
| 3 |
Can’t remember |
93 |
4.1% |
0.040861160 |
| 4 |
Do not know |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007908612 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007908612 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11464 |
|
NA |
r25_dvetn_1
|
Variable label:
|
I identify as: Norwegian
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_dvetn_2
|
Variable label:
|
I identify as: Sami
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sami
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_dvetn_3
|
Variable label:
|
I identify as: Kven/Norwegian Finnish
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Kven/Norwegian Finnish
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_dvetn_4
|
Variable label:
|
I identify as: Forest Finn
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Forest Finn
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_dvetn_5
|
Variable label:
|
I identify as: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_dvetn_5_other
|
Variable label:
|
I identify as: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_dvtck
|
Variable label:
|
Aware that the Storting has appointed a commission to investigate the
Norwegianisation policy
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you aware that the Storting (the Norwegian parliament) has appointed
a special truth and reconciliation commission to investigate the
Norwegianisation policy that targeted Sami, Kven, Norwegian Finn, and
Forest Finn people?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1021 |
43.7% |
0.437071918 |
| 2 |
No |
1304 |
55.8% |
0.558219178 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004708904 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtcr
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent a truth and reconciliation commission can contribute to
reconciliation between minority groups and the state
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think that a truth and reconciliation commission
in Norway can contribute to reconciliation between minority groups
(Sami, Kven, Norwegian Finn, and Forest Finn people) and the State?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01284247 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
266 |
11.4% |
0.11386986 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
1030 |
44.1% |
0.44092466 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
475 |
20.3% |
0.20333904 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
136 |
5.8% |
0.05821918 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
390 |
16.7% |
0.16695205 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.4% |
0.00385274 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtcn_1
|
Variable label:
|
Most people are familiar with the Norweginisation policy with regard to:
Sami people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How familiar do you think most people are with the State’s active
Norwegianisation policy in respect of the following groups that was
pursued up until the 1960s?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sami people
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very familiar |
134 |
5.7% |
0.057363014 |
| 2 |
Familiar |
611 |
26.2% |
0.261558219 |
| 3 |
Not very familiar |
1030 |
44.1% |
0.440924658 |
| 4 |
Not at all familiar |
252 |
10.8% |
0.107876712 |
| 5 |
Do not know |
291 |
12.5% |
0.124571918 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007705479 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtcn_2
|
Variable label:
|
Most people are familiar with the Norweginisation policy with regard to:
Kven/Norwegian Finns
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How familiar do you think most people are with the State’s active
Norwegianisation policy in respect of the following groups that was
pursued up until the 1960s?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Kven/Norwegian Finns
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very familiar |
35 |
1.5% |
0.01498288 |
| 2 |
Familiar |
145 |
6.2% |
0.06207192 |
| 3 |
Not very familiar |
921 |
39.4% |
0.39426370 |
| 4 |
Not at all familiar |
837 |
35.8% |
0.35830479 |
| 5 |
Do not know |
356 |
15.2% |
0.15239726 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
1.8% |
0.01797945 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtcn_3
|
Variable label:
|
Most people are familiar with the Norweginisation policy with regard to:
Forest Finns
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How familiar do you think most people are with the State’s active
Norwegianisation policy in respect of the following groups that was
pursued up until the 1960s?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Forest Finns
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very familiar |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01284247 |
| 2 |
Familiar |
94 |
4.0% |
0.04023973 |
| 3 |
Not very familiar |
742 |
31.8% |
0.31763699 |
| 4 |
Not at all familiar |
1027 |
44.0% |
0.43964041 |
| 5 |
Do not know |
399 |
17.1% |
0.17080479 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
1.9% |
0.01883562 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtcm_1
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media: TV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media:
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
654 |
28.0% |
0.279965753 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1671 |
71.5% |
0.715325342 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004708904 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtcm_2
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media: Radio
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Radio
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
311 |
13.3% |
0.133133562 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
2014 |
86.2% |
0.862157534 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004708904 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtcm_3
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media: National newspapers (paper newspapers
and online newspapers)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media:
|
|
Literal question:
|
National newspapers (paper newspapers and online newspapers)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
488 |
20.9% |
0.208904110 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1837 |
78.6% |
0.786386986 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004708904 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtcm_4
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media: Local newspapers (paper newspapers and
online newspapers)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Local newspapers (paper newspapers and online newspapers)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
97 |
4.2% |
0.041523973 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
2228 |
95.4% |
0.953767123 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004708904 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtcm_5
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media: Social media (Facebook, Twitter,
Instagram, etc.)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social media (Facebook, Youtube, etc.)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
87 |
3.7% |
0.037243151 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
2238 |
95.8% |
0.958047945 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004708904 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtcm_6
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media: Other sources
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other sources
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
132 |
5.7% |
0.056506849 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
2193 |
93.9% |
0.938784247 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004708904 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtcm_7
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media: Haven’t heard about the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Haven’t heard about the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1219 |
52.2% |
0.521832192 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1106 |
47.3% |
0.473458904 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004708904 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtim
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the work/aim of the Truth and Reconiciliation
Comission is?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In 2018 the Storting set up a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to
investigate historical injustices against the Sami people and three
minority groups in Norway (Kvens, Norwegian Finns and Forest Finns).
Prior to its establishment, discussions took place both within the Sami,
Kven and Norwegian-Finnish communities and there was partisan
disagreement about the importance of such a commission.
One of the arguments in favour of setting up the commission was that
we need more knowledge about Norwegianisation policy and its
consequences. One argument against was to leave historical injustices in
the past; you have to move on.
One of the main tasks of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is to
create reconciliation in Norway between (a) minority groups (Sami,
Kvens/Norwegian Finns and Forest Finns) and the state, and (b) between
these different minority groups and the majority population.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think this work/aim is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
507 |
21.7% |
0.217037671 |
| 2 |
Important |
1058 |
45.3% |
0.452910959 |
| 3 |
Not very important |
402 |
17.2% |
0.172089041 |
| 4 |
Not at all important |
111 |
4.8% |
0.047517123 |
| 5 |
Do not know |
241 |
10.3% |
0.103167808 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.7% |
0.007277397 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_dvtme
|
Variable label:
|
Concerns you personally: The Truth and Reconciliation Commissions work
for reconciliation between minority groups and the Norwegian majority
population
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Since 2018 the Norwegian Truth and Reconciliation Commission has been
working to collect information about the Norwegian state’s treatment of
the Sami, Kvens, Norwegian Finns and Forest Finns. Its objective is to
create reconciliation between these groups and the Norwegian majority
population.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you feel that this objective concerns you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_dvtfi
|
Variable label:
|
Knows the film: ‘Historjá - Embroidery for Sápmi’ (2022)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[image of movieposter] The film “Historjá - Embroidery for Sápmi” (2022)
has been running in Norwegian cinemas since August. It is a documentary
about a well-known female Sami artist whose embroidery conveys the
Norwegianisation policy that the Sami have been subjected to and which
many believe is still ongoing.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you know this film?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I've seen it |
14 |
0.6% |
0.005993151 |
| 2 |
Yes, I've heard about it, but I haven't seen it |
266 |
11.4% |
0.113869863 |
| 3 |
Yes, I've heard about it and I would like to see it |
123 |
5.3% |
0.052654110 |
| 4 |
No, I have never heard of the film |
1914 |
81.9% |
0.819349315 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.8% |
0.008133562 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_mepansen_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent will be exposed to
[r25_mepanx] or [r25_mesenx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2270] [Invalid:11470]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Exposed to [r25_mepanx] |
1154 |
50.8% |
0.50837 |
| 2 |
Exposed to [r25_mesenx] |
1116 |
49.2% |
0.49163 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11470 |
|
NA |
r25_mepanx
|
Variable label:
|
Describe a situation when you were really fed up with the news or wanted
to take a break from it
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The media often focus on negative events and crises. Sometimes the
amount of negative news can seem overwhelming and make you feel tired,
powerless and in a bad mood. Sometimes you just want to take a break
from all the negative news.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you recall and describe a particular situation when you were really
fed up with the news or wanted to take a break from it?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please describe this memory and how you felt in a couple of sentences,
or just a few words if that’s more convenient for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25mepansen_ran = 1 & r25_group = 5]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_mesenx
|
Variable label:
|
Describe a situation when it was really important for you to follow the
news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The media are one of our most important sources of information about
what is happening in Norway and the rest of the world. Sometimes we
might have a strong desire to read the news and update ourselves about
crises and important events.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you recall and describe a situation when it was very important for
you to follow the news?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please describe this memory and how you felt in a couple of sentences,
or just a few words if that’s more convenient for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25mepansen_ran = 2 & r25_group = 5]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_mepanx_length
|
Variable label:
|
Carries the number of characters written in [r25_mepanx]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1150] [Invalid:12590]
[Range:0-1402]
|
r25_mesenx_length
|
Variable label:
|
Carries the number of characters written in [r25_mesenx]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1111] [Invalid:12629]
[Range:0-995]
|
r25_mernex_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I want to read news about crises right now
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you
agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I want to read news about crises right now
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 5]
[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If
[r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also
shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was
also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
140 |
6.2% |
0.06156552 |
| 2 |
Agree |
352 |
15.5% |
0.15479332 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
436 |
19.2% |
0.19173263 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
417 |
18.3% |
0.18337731 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
358 |
15.7% |
0.15743184 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
331 |
14.6% |
0.14555849 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
195 |
8.6% |
0.08575198 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
2.0% |
0.01978892 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11466 |
|
NA |
r25_mernex_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I would prefer to read something entertaining rather
than reading news about crises right now
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you
agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I would prefer to read something entertaining rather than reading news
about crises right now
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 5]
[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If
[r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also
shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was
also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
161 |
7.1% |
0.07080035 |
| 2 |
Agree |
404 |
17.8% |
0.17766051 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
507 |
22.3% |
0.22295515 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
510 |
22.4% |
0.22427441 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
317 |
13.9% |
0.13940193 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
240 |
10.6% |
0.10554090 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
82 |
3.6% |
0.03605981 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
53 |
2.3% |
0.02330695 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11466 |
|
NA |
r25_mernex_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It’s best for me to take breaks from reading news about
crises right now
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you
agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s best for me to take breaks from reading news about crises right now
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 5]
[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If
[r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also
shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was
also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
128 |
5.6% |
0.05628848 |
| 2 |
Agree |
261 |
11.5% |
0.11477573 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
400 |
17.6% |
0.17590150 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
535 |
23.5% |
0.23526825 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
327 |
14.4% |
0.14379947 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
419 |
18.4% |
0.18425682 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
150 |
6.6% |
0.06596306 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
2.4% |
0.02374670 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11466 |
|
NA |
r25_mernex_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It’s important for me not to miss any major news about
society right now
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you
agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important for me not to miss any major news about society right now
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 5]
[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If
[r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also
shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was
also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
353 |
15.5% |
0.15523307 |
| 2 |
Agree |
810 |
35.6% |
0.35620053 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
496 |
21.8% |
0.21811785 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
275 |
12.1% |
0.12093228 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
144 |
6.3% |
0.06332454 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
105 |
4.6% |
0.04617414 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
48 |
2.1% |
0.02110818 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
1.9% |
0.01890941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11466 |
|
NA |
r25_mernex_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The amount of negative news is overwhelming for me
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you
agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The amount of negative news is overwhelming for me
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 5]
[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If
[r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also
shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was
also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
67 |
5.8% |
0.05805893 |
| 2 |
Agree |
154 |
13.3% |
0.13344887 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
323 |
28.0% |
0.27989601 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
213 |
18.5% |
0.18457539 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
140 |
12.1% |
0.12131716 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
172 |
14.9% |
0.14904679 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
63 |
5.5% |
0.05459272 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01906412 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12586 |
|
NA |
r25_mernex_6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The news focuses too much on negative events
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you
agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The news focuses too much on negative events
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 5]
[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If
[r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also
shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was
also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
145 |
12.6% |
0.12564991 |
| 2 |
Agree |
232 |
20.1% |
0.20103986 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
316 |
27.4% |
0.27383016 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
220 |
19.1% |
0.19064125 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
106 |
9.2% |
0.09185442 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
92 |
8.0% |
0.07972270 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01906412 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01819757 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12586 |
|
NA |
r25_mernex_7
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It’s important that I keep up to date with the news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you
agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important that I keep up to date with the news
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 5]
[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If
[r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also
shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was
also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
262 |
23.5% |
0.23476703 |
| 2 |
Agree |
488 |
43.7% |
0.43727599 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
234 |
21.0% |
0.20967742 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
45 |
4.0% |
0.04032258 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
29 |
2.6% |
0.02598566 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
21 |
1.9% |
0.01881720 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
18 |
1.6% |
0.01612903 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.7% |
0.01702509 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12624 |
|
NA |
r25_mernex_8
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I feel it’s my duty to keep up to date with the news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you
agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel it’s my duty to keep up to date with the news
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 5]
[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If
[r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] are also
shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] are
also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
172 |
15.4% |
0.15412186 |
| 2 |
Agree |
372 |
33.3% |
0.33333333 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
264 |
23.7% |
0.23655914 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
142 |
12.7% |
0.12724014 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
54 |
4.8% |
0.04838710 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
57 |
5.1% |
0.05107527 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
33 |
3.0% |
0.02956989 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
2.0% |
0.01971326 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12624 |
|
NA |
r25_mernw_group
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Subgroup for the [r25_mernw]-experiment and associated
variables.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 1:
Sometimes you’re so tired and overwhelmed that you can’t bear to
follow news that might put you in a bad mood. Sometimes you want to take
a break from news about negative events and crises. Think about how you
feel and what’s important to you right now.
During the next three minutes, you’ll be able to use a news site in a
way that suits you best right now. You can click on and read any items
that you want. All the items describe real events and are written by
real journalists.
Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” in
order to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question after
three minutes.
[r25_mepansen_ran] == 2:
Sometimes it’s extra important to keep up to date and follow the
news. Think about how you feel and what’s important to you right
now.
During the next three minutes you will be able to keep up to date
with the news by using a news site. You can click on and read the items
you want and that feel right for you right now. All the items describe
real events and are written by real journalists.
Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” in
order to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question after three
minutes.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2246] [Invalid:11494]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 - Traditional articles |
1182 |
52.6% |
0.5262689 |
| 2 |
Group 2 - Constructive articles |
1064 |
47.4% |
0.4737311 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11494 |
|
NA |
r25_mernw_session
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Number of sessions in [r25_mernw]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Knudsen (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Contact erik.knudsen@uib.no for further documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2246] [Invalid:11494]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1971 |
87.8% |
0.877560107 |
| 2 |
|
228 |
10.2% |
0.101513802 |
| 3 |
|
36 |
1.6% |
0.016028495 |
| 4 |
|
10 |
0.4% |
0.004452360 |
| 9 |
|
1 |
0.0% |
0.000445236 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11494 |
|
NA |
r25_mernwtimefp1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Time spent on front page in first session in [r25_mernw].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Knudsen (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Contact erik.knudsen@uib.no for further documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2109] [Invalid:11631]
[Range:-]
|
r25_mernwtimefp2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Time spent on front page in second session in [r25_mernw].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Knudsen (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Contact erik.knudsen@uib.no for further documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:248] [Invalid:13492]
[Range:-]
|
r25_mernwtimefp3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Time spent on front page in the last session in [r25_mernw],
if more than two sessions.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Knudsen (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Contact erik.knudsen@uib.no for further documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:44] [Invalid:13696]
[Range:-]
|
r25_mernwtime1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Time spent on individual articles in first session in
[r25_mernw]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Knudsen (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[article1, article2, article..n, article17]
[Contact erik.knudsen@uib.no for further documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2109] [Invalid:11631]
[Range:-]
|
r25_mernwtime2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Time spent on invidiual articles in second session in
[r25_mernw]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Knudsen (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[article1, article2, article..n, article17]
[Contact erik.knudsen@uib.no for further documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:248] [Invalid:13492]
[Range:-]
|
r25_mernwtime3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Time spent on individual articles in the last session in
[r25_mernw], if more than two sessions
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Knudsen (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[article1, article2, article..n, article17]
[Contact erik.knudsen@uib.no for further documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:44] [Invalid:13696]
[Range:-]
|
r25_mernwclickorder1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Click-order from the first session in [r25_mernw]
|
|
Post-question:
|
[Contact erik.knudsen@uib.no for further documentation]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Knudsen (UiB)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:1469] [Invalid:12271]
[Range:-]
|
r25_mernwclickorder2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Click-order from the second session in [r25_mernw]
|
|
Post-question:
|
[Contact erik.knudsen@uib.no for further documentation]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Knudsen (UiB)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:178] [Invalid:13562]
[Range:-]
|
r25_mernwclickorder3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Click-order from the last session in [r25_mernw], if more
than two sessions
|
|
Post-question:
|
[Contact erik.knudsen@uib.no for further documentation]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Knudsen (UiB)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:28] [Invalid:13712]
[Range:-]
|
r25_poelpx
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you feel confident that you can contribute towards
solving the climate crisis?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you feel confident that you can contribute towards
solving the climate crisis?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
28 |
1.2% |
0.01231310 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
130 |
5.7% |
0.05716799 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
885 |
38.9% |
0.38918206 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
929 |
40.9% |
0.40853122 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
239 |
10.5% |
0.10510114 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
2.8% |
0.02770449 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11466 |
|
NA |
r25_poreix
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you feel confident that you can deal with recent
interest rate increases?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you feel confident that you can deal with recent
interest rate increases?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
587 |
25.8% |
0.25813544 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
876 |
38.5% |
0.38522427 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
523 |
23.0% |
0.22999120 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
138 |
6.1% |
0.06068602 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
41 |
1.8% |
0.01802990 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
109 |
4.8% |
0.04793316 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11466 |
|
NA |
r25_mefnex
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I would like to keep up with important news stories
right now
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I would like to keep up with important news stories right now.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
472 |
20.8% |
0.20756376 |
| 2 |
Agree |
962 |
42.3% |
0.42304310 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
488 |
21.5% |
0.21459982 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
144 |
6.3% |
0.06332454 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
75 |
3.3% |
0.03298153 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
44 |
1.9% |
0.01934916 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
29 |
1.3% |
0.01275286 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
2.6% |
0.02638522 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11466 |
|
NA |
r25_limeax
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you feel that what you do in life is meaningful
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, to what extent do you feel that what you do in
life is meaningful?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very meaningful |
470 |
20.7% |
0.20668426 |
| 2 |
Fairly meaningful |
1111 |
48.9% |
0.48856640 |
| 3 |
Slightly meaningful |
502 |
22.1% |
0.22075638 |
| 4 |
Not very meaningful |
105 |
4.6% |
0.04617414 |
| 5 |
Not at all meaningful |
24 |
1.1% |
0.01055409 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
62 |
2.7% |
0.02726473 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11466 |
|
NA |
r25_cerenx_1a_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p8saneclim_1a_ran
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 3,4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
a large solar energy park in your municipality |
1589 |
34.7% |
0.3467161 |
| 2 |
a large onshore wind farm in your municipality |
1500 |
32.7% |
0.3272965 |
| 3 |
a large hydrogen production plant in your municipality |
1494 |
32.6% |
0.3259873 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9157 |
|
NA |
r25_cerenx_1b_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p8saneclim_1b_ran
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r25_cerenx_1a_ran] == 1 the value is set to 1. If
[r25_cerenx_1a_ran] == 2 the value is set to 2. If [r25_cerenx_1a_ran]
== 3 the value is set to 3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the solar energy park |
1589 |
34.7% |
0.3467161 |
| 2 |
the wind farm |
1500 |
32.7% |
0.3272965 |
| 3 |
hydrogen production plant |
1494 |
32.6% |
0.3259873 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9157 |
|
NA |
r25_cerenx_2_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p8saneclim_2_ran1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r25_cerenx_3_ran1] == 1 or [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] == 1 the value is
set to 2. For other cases the value is set to 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Due to its size [r25_cerenx_1b_ran] will have both positive and negative
consequences |
2560 |
55.9% |
0.5585861 |
| 2 |
BLANK |
2023 |
44.1% |
0.4414139 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9157 |
|
NA |
r25_cerenx_2_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p8saneclim_2_ran2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] == 1 the value is set to 2. If
[r25_cerenx_3_ran2] == 1 or [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] == 1 the value is set to
3. If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] the value is set to 3. For other cases the
value is set to 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
On the one hand, it will |
2560 |
55.9% |
0.5585861 |
| 2 |
However, due to its size, [r25_cerenx_1b_ran] will also |
856 |
18.7% |
0.1867772 |
| 3 |
BLANK |
1167 |
25.5% |
0.2546367 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9157 |
|
NA |
r25_cerenx_2_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p8saneclim_2_ran3
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 3,4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
1167 |
25.5% |
0.2546367 |
| 2 |
harm local nature and wildlife by, for example, disrupting ecosystems and animal
migration. |
1139 |
24.9% |
0.2485272 |
| 3 |
damage the beautiful surrounding countryside, something which could reduce our
enjoyment of outdoor activities. |
1166 |
25.4% |
0.2544185 |
| 4 |
close some natural areas to the general public as a result of safety measures. |
1111 |
24.2% |
0.2424176 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9157 |
|
NA |
r25_cerenx_3_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p8saneclim_3_ran1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] != 1 the value is set to 1. If
[r25_cerenx_3_ran2] == 1 and [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] != 1 the value is set
to 2. If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] == 1 and [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] the value is
set to 3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
On the other hand it will [r25_cerenx_1b_ran] |
2560 |
55.9% |
0.5585861 |
| 2 |
In addition, due to its size, [r25_cerenx_1b_ran] will also |
841 |
18.4% |
0.1835043 |
| 3 |
BLANK |
1182 |
25.8% |
0.2579097 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9157 |
|
NA |
r25_cerenx_3_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p8saneclim_3_ran2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 3,4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
1182 |
25.8% |
0.2579097 |
| 2 |
mean that electricity will be cheaper in your municipality |
1190 |
26.0% |
0.2596552 |
| 3 |
mean that new jobs will be created in your municipality. |
1112 |
24.3% |
0.2426358 |
| 4 |
mean that extra tax revenue will be generated in your municipality, which will
benefit the residents. |
1099 |
24.0% |
0.2397993 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9157 |
|
NA |
r25_cerenx_wording
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p8saneclim_wording
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] == 1 and [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] == 1 the value is
set to 2. If [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] != 1 and [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] == 1, or
[r25_cerenx_2_ran3] == 1 and [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] != 1, or
[r25_cerenx_2_ran3] != 1 and [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] != 1 the value is set
to 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Based on this information, to |
4257 |
92.9% |
0.92886755 |
| 2 |
To |
326 |
7.1% |
0.07113245 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9157 |
|
NA |
r25_cerenx_t_order
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects order for textpiping between [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] and
[r25_cerenx_3_ran2]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p8saneclim_t_order
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] != 1 and [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] != 1 the value is
randomised. For all other scenarios, the value is set to 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2560] [Invalid:11180]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[r25_cerenx_2_ran3] is shown first |
1315 |
51.4% |
0.5136719 |
| 2 |
[r25_cerenx_3_ran2] is shown first |
1245 |
48.6% |
0.4863281 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11180 |
|
NA |
r25_cerenx
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: building [r25_cerenx_1a_ran]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you have to make a decision in a case. The hypothetical
decision is as follows:
A proposal is put forward to build [r25_cerenx_1a_ran]. This will
help reduce CO2 emissions.
[r25_cerenx_2_ran1][r25_cerenx_2_ran2][r25_cerenx_pipe1]
[r25_cerenx_3_ran1][r25_cerenx_pipe2]
[r25_cerenxwording] to what extent would you be in favour of or against
the development of [r25_cerenx1bran]?
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r25_cerenxwording] to what extent would you be in favour of or against
the development of [r25_cerenx1bran]?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p8saneclim
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 3,4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly for |
495 |
10.7% |
0.107328708 |
| 2 |
For |
1157 |
25.1% |
0.250867303 |
| 3 |
Somewhat for |
908 |
19.7% |
0.196877710 |
| 4 |
Neither for nor against |
430 |
9.3% |
0.093235039 |
| 5 |
Somewhat against |
612 |
13.3% |
0.132697311 |
| 6 |
Against |
516 |
11.2% |
0.111882047 |
| 7 |
Strongly against |
460 |
10.0% |
0.099739809 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.7% |
0.007372073 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9128 |
|
NA |
r25_cecar_1
|
Variable label:
|
Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel
engines: This proposal is a good idea.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new
private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The
following statements apply to this proposal.
Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of
them.
|
|
Literal question:
|
This proposal is a good idea.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
162 |
6.9% |
0.06934932 |
| 2 |
Agree |
474 |
20.3% |
0.20291096 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
415 |
17.8% |
0.17765411 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
544 |
23.3% |
0.23287671 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
591 |
25.3% |
0.25299658 |
| 6 |
Don’t know/don’t want to answer |
96 |
4.1% |
0.04109589 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
2.3% |
0.02311644 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_cecar_2
|
Variable label:
|
Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel
engines: This proposal is sensible.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new
private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The
following statements apply to this proposal.
Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of
them.
|
|
Literal question:
|
This proposal is sensible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
156 |
6.7% |
0.06678082 |
| 2 |
Agree |
509 |
21.8% |
0.21789384 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
420 |
18.0% |
0.17979452 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
571 |
24.4% |
0.24443493 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
531 |
22.7% |
0.22731164 |
| 6 |
Don’t know/don’t want to answer |
93 |
4.0% |
0.03981164 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
2.4% |
0.02397260 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_cecar_3
|
Variable label:
|
Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel
engines: We should invest more money from both the public and private
sectors in implementing this proposal.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new
private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The
following statements apply to this proposal.
Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of
them.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should invest more money from both the public and private sectors in
implementing this proposal.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
126 |
5.4% |
0.05393836 |
| 2 |
Agree |
501 |
21.4% |
0.21446918 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
550 |
23.5% |
0.23544521 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
474 |
20.3% |
0.20291096 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
451 |
19.3% |
0.19306507 |
| 6 |
Don’t know/don’t want to answer |
166 |
7.1% |
0.07106164 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
68 |
2.9% |
0.02910959 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_cecar_4
|
Variable label:
|
Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel
engines: People should be informed about the merits of this proposal.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new
private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The
following statements apply to this proposal.
Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of
them.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People should be informed about the merits of this proposal.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
485 |
20.8% |
0.20761986 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1027 |
44.0% |
0.43964041 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
442 |
18.9% |
0.18921233 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
122 |
5.2% |
0.05222603 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
110 |
4.7% |
0.04708904 |
| 6 |
Don’t know/don’t want to answer |
95 |
4.1% |
0.04066781 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
2.4% |
0.02354452 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_cecar_5
|
Variable label:
|
Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel
engines: Accepting this proposal would have been a waste of resources.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new
private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The
following statements apply to this proposal.
Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of
them.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Accepting this proposal would have been a waste of resources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
346 |
14.8% |
0.14811644 |
| 2 |
Agree |
575 |
24.6% |
0.24614726 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
471 |
20.2% |
0.20162671 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
460 |
19.7% |
0.19691781 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
284 |
12.2% |
0.12157534 |
| 6 |
Don’t know/don’t want to answer |
143 |
6.1% |
0.06121575 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
2.4% |
0.02440068 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_cecar_6
|
Variable label:
|
Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel
engines: Accepting this proposal would have been a mistake.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new
private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The
following statements apply to this proposal.
Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of
them.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Accepting this proposal would have been a mistake.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
445 |
19.0% |
0.19049658 |
| 2 |
Agree |
593 |
25.4% |
0.25385274 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
417 |
17.9% |
0.17851027 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
433 |
18.5% |
0.18535959 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
282 |
12.1% |
0.12071918 |
| 6 |
Don’t know/don’t want to answer |
116 |
5.0% |
0.04965753 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
2.1% |
0.02140411 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_cecar_7
|
Variable label:
|
Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel
engines: People should be warned about the disadvantages of this
proposal.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new
private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The
following statements apply to this proposal.
Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of
them.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People should be warned about the disadvantages of this proposal.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
543 |
23.2% |
0.23244863 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1001 |
42.9% |
0.42851027 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
400 |
17.1% |
0.17123288 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
157 |
6.7% |
0.06720890 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
96 |
4.1% |
0.04109589 |
| 6 |
Don’t know/don’t want to answer |
85 |
3.6% |
0.03638699 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
2.3% |
0.02311644 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_cecar_8
|
Variable label:
|
Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel
engines: We should strongly oppose political parties that support this
proposal.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new
private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The
following statements apply to this proposal.
Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of
them.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should strongly oppose political parties that support this proposal.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
310 |
13.3% |
0.13270548 |
| 2 |
Agree |
393 |
16.8% |
0.16823630 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
545 |
23.3% |
0.23330479 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
516 |
22.1% |
0.22089041 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
421 |
18.0% |
0.18022260 |
| 6 |
Don’t know/don’t want to answer |
96 |
4.1% |
0.04109589 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
2.4% |
0.02354452 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11404 |
|
NA |
r25_pcpak
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
65 |
2.9% |
0.029491833 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
551 |
25.0% |
0.250000000 |
| 3 |
The Progressive Party |
156 |
7.1% |
0.070780399 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
105 |
4.8% |
0.047640653 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
220 |
10.0% |
0.099818512 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
113 |
5.1% |
0.051270417 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
111 |
5.0% |
0.050362976 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
477 |
21.6% |
0.216424682 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
128 |
5.8% |
0.058076225 |
| 10 |
Folkets parti FNB |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003176044 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001814882 |
| 12 |
A local list |
53 |
2.4% |
0.024047187 |
| 13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
65 |
2.9% |
0.029491833 |
| 14 |
Would not vote |
52 |
2.4% |
0.023593466 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004990926 |
| 16 |
Other: |
81 |
3.7% |
0.036751361 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002268603 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_pcpak_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections
were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_pcpaf
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
66 |
3.0% |
0.029945554 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
533 |
24.2% |
0.241833031 |
| 3 |
The Progressive Party |
161 |
7.3% |
0.073049002 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
96 |
4.4% |
0.043557169 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
227 |
10.3% |
0.102994555 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
106 |
4.8% |
0.048094374 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
128 |
5.8% |
0.058076225 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
442 |
20.1% |
0.200544465 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
119 |
5.4% |
0.053992740 |
| 10 |
Folkets parti FNB |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001814882 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 12 |
A local list |
25 |
1.1% |
0.011343013 |
| 13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
76 |
3.4% |
0.034482759 |
| 14 |
Would not vote |
109 |
4.9% |
0.049455535 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
14 |
0.6% |
0.006352087 |
| 16 |
Other: |
86 |
3.9% |
0.039019964 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005444646 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_pcpaf_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which political party would you vote for if county council
elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_mlmrc
|
Variable label:
|
Do you live in a merged county?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you live in a merged county?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1517 |
68.8% |
0.688294011 |
| 2 |
No |
680 |
30.9% |
0.308529946 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003176044 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlat_1
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The municipality you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The municipality you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Experiment. All respondents are exposed to [r25_mlat_1] and
[r25_mlat_5]- If [r25_mlmrc] == 1 [r25_mlat_3] and [r25_mlat_4] are also
shown. If [r25_mlmrc] != 1 [r25_mlat_2] is also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
787 |
35.7% |
0.357078040 |
| 2 |
Connection |
801 |
36.3% |
0.363430127 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
382 |
17.3% |
0.173321234 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
197 |
8.9% |
0.089382940 |
| 5 |
No connection |
34 |
1.5% |
0.015426497 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001361162 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlat_2
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The county you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The county you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Experiment. All respondents are exposed to [r25_mlat_1] and
[r25_mlat_5]- If [r25_mlmrc] == 1 [r25_mlat_3] and [r25_mlat_4] are also
shown. If [r25_mlmrc] != 1 [r25_mlat_2] is also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
194 |
28.2% |
0.28238719 |
| 2 |
Connection |
223 |
32.5% |
0.32459971 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
136 |
19.8% |
0.19796215 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
85 |
12.4% |
0.12372635 |
| 5 |
No connection |
31 |
4.5% |
0.04512373 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
2.6% |
0.02620087 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13053 |
|
NA |
r25_mlat_3
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The county you lived in before it was
merged
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The county you lived in before it was merged
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Experiment. All respondents are exposed to [r25_mlat_1] and
[r25_mlat_5]- If [r25_mlmrc] == 1 [r25_mlat_3] and [r25_mlat_4] are also
shown. If [r25_mlmrc] != 1 [r25_mlat_2] is also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
348 |
22.9% |
0.22940013 |
| 2 |
Connection |
562 |
37.0% |
0.37046803 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
310 |
20.4% |
0.20435069 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
211 |
13.9% |
0.13909031 |
| 5 |
No connection |
61 |
4.0% |
0.04021094 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.6% |
0.01647989 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12223 |
|
NA |
r25_mlat_4
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The county you live in after it was
merged
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The county you live in after it was merged
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Experiment. All respondents are exposed to [r25_mlat_1] and
[r25_mlat_5]- If [r25_mlmrc] == 1 [r25_mlat_3] and [r25_mlat_4] are also
shown. If [r25_mlmrc] != 1 [r25_mlat_2] is also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
134 |
8.8% |
0.08833223 |
| 2 |
Connection |
382 |
25.2% |
0.25181279 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
401 |
26.4% |
0.26433751 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
411 |
27.1% |
0.27092947 |
| 5 |
No connection |
158 |
10.4% |
0.10415293 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.0% |
0.02043507 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12223 |
|
NA |
r25_mlat_5
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Experiment. All respondents are exposed to [r25_mlat_1] and
[r25_mlat_5]- If [r25_mlmrc] == 1 [r25_mlat_3] and [r25_mlat_4] are also
shown. If [r25_mlmrc] != 1 [r25_mlat_2] is also shown.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
1650 |
74.9% |
0.748638838 |
| 2 |
Connection |
398 |
18.1% |
0.180580762 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
72 |
3.3% |
0.032667877 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
30 |
1.4% |
0.013611615 |
| 5 |
No connection |
2 |
0.1% |
0.000907441 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
2.4% |
0.023593466 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_cpres
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich
parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that
everyone receives public services of the same quality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the
country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives
public services of the same quality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
319 |
14.5% |
0.144736842 |
| 2 |
Agree |
758 |
34.4% |
0.343920145 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
695 |
31.5% |
0.315335753 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
207 |
9.4% |
0.093920145 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
132 |
6.0% |
0.059891107 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
55 |
2.5% |
0.024954628 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
34 |
1.5% |
0.015426497 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001814882 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_pcrur
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for
non-urban/rural Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
335 |
15.2% |
0.151996370 |
| 2 |
Agree |
523 |
23.7% |
0.237295826 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
574 |
26.0% |
0.260435572 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
366 |
16.6% |
0.166061706 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
189 |
8.6% |
0.085753176 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
165 |
7.5% |
0.074863884 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
2.1% |
0.020871143 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002722323 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_pcecr
|
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in [r25_P2] compared to the rest of the country
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation [r25_P2] with the rest of Norway,
do you consider the situation [r25_P2] as being better, the same or
worse?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Better |
531 |
24.1% |
0.240925590 |
| 2 |
The same |
1272 |
57.7% |
0.577132486 |
| 3 |
Worse |
380 |
17.2% |
0.172413793 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.0% |
0.009528131 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlsmc_1
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Further merging of counties.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January
2020. Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this
has recently been the subject of debate. Some people support additional
mergers, while others believe that county councils/municipalities should
be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Yet others want
the municipalities and county councils to remain as they are today.
How strongly do you support these various views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Further merging of counties.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
100 |
4.5% |
0.04537205 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
128 |
5.8% |
0.05807623 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
259 |
11.8% |
0.11751361 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
587 |
26.6% |
0.26633394 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
458 |
20.8% |
0.20780399 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
381 |
17.3% |
0.17286751 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
257 |
11.7% |
0.11660617 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
1.5% |
0.01542650 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlsmc_2
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Retain the present number of counties.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January
2020. Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this
has recently been the subject of debate. Some people support additional
mergers, while others believe that county councils/municipalities should
be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Yet others want
the municipalities and county councils to remain as they are today.
How strongly do you support these various views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Retain the present number of counties.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
119 |
5.4% |
0.05399274 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
229 |
10.4% |
0.10390200 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
403 |
18.3% |
0.18284936 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
798 |
36.2% |
0.36206897 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
377 |
17.1% |
0.17105263 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
133 |
6.0% |
0.06034483 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
99 |
4.5% |
0.04491833 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
2.1% |
0.02087114 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlsmc_3
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Give counties the opportunity to assume
their original form.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January
2020. Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this
has recently been the subject of debate. Some people support additional
mergers, while others believe that county councils/municipalities should
be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Yet others want
the municipalities and county councils to remain as they are today.
How strongly do you support these various views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give counties the opportunity to assume their original form.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
213 |
9.7% |
0.09664247 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
292 |
13.2% |
0.13248639 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
475 |
21.6% |
0.21551724 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
395 |
17.9% |
0.17921960 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
310 |
14.1% |
0.14065336 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
226 |
10.3% |
0.10254083 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
261 |
11.8% |
0.11842105 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.5% |
0.01451906 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mltar
|
Variable label:
|
Division of tasks between authorities: County authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In addition to a debate on merging county municipalities, there is
also a debate about which tasks should be undertaken by the state, the
counties and the municipalities. If one level is assigned new tasks, it
usually means that another level loses responsibility for those
tasks.
Which of the following statements is closest to your point of view.
|
|
Literal question:
|
County authorities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
should have more tasks |
311 |
14.1% |
0.14110708 |
| 2 |
should keep the tasks that they have |
1032 |
46.8% |
0.46823956 |
| 3 |
should have fewer tasks |
333 |
15.1% |
0.15108893 |
| 4 |
should be closed down |
477 |
21.6% |
0.21642468 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
2.3% |
0.02313975 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcosx_rangroup
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects which group of questions the respondent
will be exposed to.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomised for respondents not from Oslo] [If [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] ==
1 the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcosx], [r25_mlcom], and
[r25_mlcmr] in order. If [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] == 2 the respondent was
exposed to [r25_mlcosx], [r25_mlcos], and [r25_mlcsr] in order. If
[r25_mlcosx_rangroup] == 3 the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcom],
[r25_mlcmr], and [r25_mlcosx] in order. If [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] == 4
the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcos], [r25_mlcmr], and [r25_mlcosx]
in order.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1877] [Invalid:11863]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 |
447 |
23.8% |
0.2381460 |
| 2 |
Group 2 |
486 |
25.9% |
0.2589238 |
| 3 |
Group 3 |
494 |
26.3% |
0.2631859 |
| 4 |
Group 4 |
450 |
24.0% |
0.2397443 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11863 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcosx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_mlcosx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomised for respondents not from Oslo]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1877] [Invalid:11863]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Consider that the Storting votes to divide [r25_P3] into two or more smaller
counties. |
617 |
32.9% |
0.3287160 |
| 2 |
Consider that the Storting votes to divide [r25_P3] into two or more smaller
counties after a referendum in the county shows that two-thirds of residents
want partition. |
643 |
34.3% |
0.3425679 |
| 3 |
Consider that the Storting votes to divide [r25_P3] into two or more smaller
counties after a referendum in the county shows that two-thirds of the
representatives want partition. |
617 |
32.9% |
0.3287160 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11863 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcosxo_rangroup
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects which group of questions the respondent
will be exposed to.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomised for respondents from Oslo]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:314] [Invalid:13426]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 |
78 |
24.8% |
0.2484076 |
| 2 |
Group 2 |
81 |
25.8% |
0.2579618 |
| 3 |
Group 3 |
85 |
27.1% |
0.2707006 |
| 4 |
Group 4 |
70 |
22.3% |
0.2229299 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13426 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcosxo_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_mlcosxo]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomised for respondents from Oslo] [If r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] == 1
the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcosxo], [r25_mlcom], and
[r25_mlcmr] in order. If r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] == 2 the respondent was
exposed to [r25_mlcosxo], [r25_mlcos], and [r25_mlcsr] in order. If
r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] == 3 the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcom],
[r25_mlcmr], and [r25_mlcosxo] in order. If r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] == 4
the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcos], [r25_mlcsr], and
[r25_mlcosxo] in order.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:314] [Invalid:13426]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Consider that the Storting votes to divide Viken into two or more smaller
counties. |
105 |
33.4% |
0.3343949 |
| 2 |
Consider that the Storting votes to divide Viken into two or more smaller
counties after a referendum in the county shows that two-thirds of residents
want partition. |
115 |
36.6% |
0.3662420 |
| 3 |
Consider that the Storting votes to divide Viken into two or more smaller
counties after a referendum in the county shows that two-thirds of the
representatives want partition. |
94 |
29.9% |
0.2993631 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13426 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcosx
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable/unacceptable: [r25_mlcosx_ran]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[r25_mlcosx_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally acceptable |
339 |
18.1% |
0.180607352 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
393 |
20.9% |
0.209376665 |
| 3 |
Not very acceptable |
156 |
8.3% |
0.083111348 |
| 4 |
Neither acceptable nor unacceptable |
219 |
11.7% |
0.116675546 |
| 5 |
Slightly unacceptable |
153 |
8.2% |
0.081513053 |
| 6 |
Unacceptable |
336 |
17.9% |
0.179009057 |
| 7 |
Completely unacceptable |
265 |
14.1% |
0.141182738 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.9% |
0.008524241 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11863 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcosxo
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable/unacceptable: [r25_mlcosxo_ran]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[r25_mlcosxo_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4]
[Only posed to respondents from Oslo]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally acceptable |
73 |
23.2% |
0.23248408 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
78 |
24.8% |
0.24840764 |
| 3 |
Not very acceptable |
33 |
10.5% |
0.10509554 |
| 4 |
Neither acceptable nor unacceptable |
37 |
11.8% |
0.11783439 |
| 5 |
Slightly unacceptable |
27 |
8.6% |
0.08598726 |
| 6 |
Unacceptable |
42 |
13.4% |
0.13375796 |
| 7 |
Completely unacceptable |
21 |
6.7% |
0.06687898 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
1.0% |
0.00955414 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13426 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcsr_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county
divisions: How merging affects local democracy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would also like to know how important the following factors are for
your opinion on county divisions:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How merging affects local democracy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
177 |
16.3% |
0.16283349 |
| 2 |
Important |
431 |
39.7% |
0.39650414 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
279 |
25.7% |
0.25666973 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
120 |
11.0% |
0.11039558 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
56 |
5.2% |
0.05151794 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
2.2% |
0.02207912 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12653 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcsr_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county
divisions: How merging affects county services (e.g. upper secondary
education, county roads, dental health).
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would also like to know how important the following factors are for
your opinion on county divisions:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How merging affects county services (e.g. upper secondary education,
county roads, dental health).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
214 |
19.7% |
0.19687213 |
| 2 |
Important |
457 |
42.0% |
0.42042318 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
271 |
24.9% |
0.24931003 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
79 |
7.3% |
0.07267709 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
40 |
3.7% |
0.03679853 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
2.4% |
0.02391904 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12653 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcsr_3
|
Variable label:
|
How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county
divisions: How decisions about merging were made.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would also like to know how important the following factors are for
your opinion on county divisions:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How decisions about merging were made.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
194 |
17.8% |
0.17847286 |
| 2 |
Important |
414 |
38.1% |
0.38086477 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
290 |
26.7% |
0.26678933 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
114 |
10.5% |
0.10487580 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
53 |
4.9% |
0.04875805 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
2.0% |
0.02023919 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12653 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcsr_4
|
Variable label:
|
How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county
divisions: How merging affects people’s regional identity.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would also like to know how important the following factors are for
your opinion on county divisions:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How merging affects people’s regional identity.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
136 |
12.5% |
0.12511500 |
| 2 |
Important |
332 |
30.5% |
0.30542778 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
290 |
26.7% |
0.26678933 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
213 |
19.6% |
0.19595216 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
89 |
8.2% |
0.08187672 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2.5% |
0.02483901 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12653 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcos_1
|
Variable label:
|
Level of favour in arguments on division of counties: makes it harder
for residents to be heard in county politics.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to
dividing counties.
We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the
following arguments.
Division of counties…
|
|
Literal question:
|
makes it easier for residents to be heard in county politics.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
100 |
9.2% |
0.09199632 |
| 2 |
Agree |
211 |
19.4% |
0.19411224 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
217 |
20.0% |
0.19963201 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
293 |
27.0% |
0.26954922 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
89 |
8.2% |
0.08187672 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
109 |
10.0% |
0.10027599 |
| 7 |
Completely disagree |
52 |
4.8% |
0.04783809 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.5% |
0.01471941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12653 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcos_2
|
Variable label:
|
Level of favour in arguments on division of counties: makes county
policy less adapted to the needs of residents.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to
dividing counties.
We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the
following arguments.
Division of counties…
|
|
Literal question:
|
makes county policy more adapted to the needs of residents.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
97 |
8.9% |
0.08923643 |
| 2 |
Agree |
202 |
18.6% |
0.18583257 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
224 |
20.6% |
0.20607176 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
264 |
24.3% |
0.24287029 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
114 |
10.5% |
0.10487580 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
107 |
9.8% |
0.09843606 |
| 7 |
Completely disagree |
65 |
6.0% |
0.05979761 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.3% |
0.01287948 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12653 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcos_3
|
Variable label:
|
Level of favour in arguments on division of counties: make county
government spending more efficient.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to
dividing counties.
We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the
following arguments.
Division of counties…
|
|
Literal question:
|
make county government spending less efficient.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
108 |
9.9% |
0.09935603 |
| 2 |
Agree |
174 |
16.0% |
0.16007360 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
197 |
18.1% |
0.18123275 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
309 |
28.4% |
0.28426863 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
125 |
11.5% |
0.11499540 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
101 |
9.3% |
0.09291628 |
| 7 |
Completely disagree |
55 |
5.1% |
0.05059798 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.7% |
0.01655934 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12653 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcos_4
|
Variable label:
|
Level of favour in arguments on division of counties: increases the
quality of county services (e.g. upper secondary education, county
roads, dental health).
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to
dividing counties.
We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the
following arguments.
Division of counties…
|
|
Literal question:
|
reduces the quality of county services (e.g. upper secondary education,
county roads, dental health).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
84 |
7.7% |
0.07727691 |
| 2 |
Agree |
136 |
12.5% |
0.12511500 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
178 |
16.4% |
0.16375345 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
300 |
27.6% |
0.27598896 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
162 |
14.9% |
0.14903404 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
143 |
13.2% |
0.13155474 |
| 7 |
Completely disagree |
66 |
6.1% |
0.06071757 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.7% |
0.01655934 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12653 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcmr_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county
mergers: How merging affects local democracy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would also like to know how important the following factors are for
your opinion on county mergers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How merging affects local democracy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
207 |
18.8% |
0.18750000 |
| 2 |
Important |
432 |
39.1% |
0.39130435 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
281 |
25.5% |
0.25452899 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
107 |
9.7% |
0.09692029 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
49 |
4.4% |
0.04438406 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
2.5% |
0.02536232 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcmr_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county
mergers: How merging affects county services (e.g. upper secondary
education, county roads, dental health).
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would also like to know how important the following factors are for
your opinion on county mergers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How merging affects county services (e.g. upper secondary education,
county roads, dental health).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
230 |
20.8% |
0.20833333 |
| 2 |
Important |
518 |
46.9% |
0.46920290 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
242 |
21.9% |
0.21920290 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
63 |
5.7% |
0.05706522 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
27 |
2.4% |
0.02445652 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcmr_3
|
Variable label:
|
How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county
mergers: How decisions about merging were made.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would also like to know how important the following factors are for
your opinion on county mergers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How decisions about merging were made.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
222 |
20.1% |
0.20108696 |
| 2 |
Important |
417 |
37.8% |
0.37771739 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
279 |
25.3% |
0.25271739 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
106 |
9.6% |
0.09601449 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
52 |
4.7% |
0.04710145 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
2.5% |
0.02536232 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcmr_4
|
Variable label:
|
How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county
mergers: How merging affects people’s regional identity.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would also like to know how important the following factors are for
your opinion on county mergers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How merging affects people’s regional identity.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
153 |
13.9% |
0.13858696 |
| 2 |
Important |
319 |
28.9% |
0.28894928 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
304 |
27.5% |
0.27536232 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
198 |
17.9% |
0.17934783 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
103 |
9.3% |
0.09329710 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2.4% |
0.02445652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcom_1
|
Variable label:
|
Level of favour in arguments on merging of counties: makes it harder for
residents to be heard in county politics.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to
merging counties.
We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the
following arguments.
Merging of counties…
|
|
Literal question:
|
makes it harder for residents to be heard in county politics.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
134 |
12.1% |
0.12137681 |
| 2 |
Agree |
258 |
23.4% |
0.23369565 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
280 |
25.4% |
0.25362319 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
244 |
22.1% |
0.22101449 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
81 |
7.3% |
0.07336957 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
69 |
6.2% |
0.06250000 |
| 7 |
Completely disagree |
25 |
2.3% |
0.02264493 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
1.2% |
0.01177536 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcom_2
|
Variable label:
|
Level of favour in arguments on merging of counties: makes county policy
less adapted to the needs of residents.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to
merging counties.
We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the
following arguments.
Merging of counties…
|
|
Literal question:
|
makes county policy less adapted to the needs of residents.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
126 |
11.4% |
0.11413043 |
| 2 |
Agree |
227 |
20.6% |
0.20561594 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
255 |
23.1% |
0.23097826 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
267 |
24.2% |
0.24184783 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
115 |
10.4% |
0.10416667 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
71 |
6.4% |
0.06431159 |
| 7 |
Completely disagree |
31 |
2.8% |
0.02807971 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.1% |
0.01086957 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcom_3
|
Variable label:
|
Level of favour in arguments on merging of counties: make county
government spending more efficient.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to
merging counties.
We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the
following arguments.
Merging of counties…
|
|
Literal question:
|
make county government spending more efficient.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
81 |
7.3% |
0.07336957 |
| 2 |
Agree |
157 |
14.2% |
0.14221014 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
209 |
18.9% |
0.18931159 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
301 |
27.3% |
0.27264493 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
163 |
14.8% |
0.14764493 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
127 |
11.5% |
0.11503623 |
| 7 |
Completely disagree |
52 |
4.7% |
0.04710145 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.3% |
0.01268116 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r25_mlcom_4
|
Variable label:
|
Level of favour in arguments on merging of counties: increases the
quality of county services (e.g. upper secondary education, county
roads, dental health).
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to
merging counties.
We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the
following arguments.
Merging of counties…
|
|
Literal question:
|
increases the quality of county services (e.g. upper secondary
education, county roads, dental health).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or
[r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
66 |
6.0% |
0.05978261 |
| 2 |
Agree |
147 |
13.3% |
0.13315217 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
189 |
17.1% |
0.17119565 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
333 |
30.2% |
0.30163043 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
161 |
14.6% |
0.14583333 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
142 |
12.9% |
0.12862319 |
| 7 |
Completely disagree |
53 |
4.8% |
0.04800725 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
1.2% |
0.01177536 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12636 |
|
NA |
r25_mlser_1
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with public services: Primary and lower secondary school
(Years 1 to 10)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
How satisfied are you with the quality of the following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Primary and lower secondary school (Years 1 to 10)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Shown on the same page as [r25_mlseq_1_1] - [r25_mlseq_6_3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
115 |
5.2% |
0.05217786 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
798 |
36.2% |
0.36206897 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
405 |
18.4% |
0.18375681 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
550 |
25.0% |
0.24954628 |
| 5 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
174 |
7.9% |
0.07894737 |
| 6 |
Dissatisfied |
65 |
2.9% |
0.02949183 |
| 7 |
Very dissatisfied |
36 |
1.6% |
0.01633394 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
61 |
2.8% |
0.02767695 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlser_2
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with public services: Upper secondary school
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
How satisfied are you with the quality of the following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Upper secondary school
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Shown on the same page as [r25_mlseq_1_1] - [r25_mlseq_6_3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
118 |
5.4% |
0.053539020 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
843 |
38.2% |
0.382486388 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
410 |
18.6% |
0.186025408 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
602 |
27.3% |
0.273139746 |
| 5 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
119 |
5.4% |
0.053992740 |
| 6 |
Dissatisfied |
35 |
1.6% |
0.015880218 |
| 7 |
Very dissatisfied |
14 |
0.6% |
0.006352087 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
2.9% |
0.028584392 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlser_3
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with public services: Higher education
(university/university college)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
How satisfied are you with the quality of the following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Higher education (university/university college)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Shown on the same page as [r25_mlseq_1_1] - [r25_mlseq_6_3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
190 |
8.6% |
0.086206897 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
976 |
44.3% |
0.442831216 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
339 |
15.4% |
0.153811252 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
533 |
24.2% |
0.241833031 |
| 5 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
76 |
3.4% |
0.034482759 |
| 6 |
Dissatisfied |
26 |
1.2% |
0.011796733 |
| 7 |
Very dissatisfied |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002722323 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
2.6% |
0.026315789 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlser_4
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with public services: Hospitals
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
How satisfied are you with the quality of the following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hospitals
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Shown on the same page as [r25_mlseq_1_1] - [r25_mlseq_6_3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
240 |
10.9% |
0.10889292 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
924 |
41.9% |
0.41923775 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
426 |
19.3% |
0.19328494 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
238 |
10.8% |
0.10798548 |
| 5 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
210 |
9.5% |
0.09528131 |
| 6 |
Dissatisfied |
91 |
4.1% |
0.04128857 |
| 7 |
Very dissatisfied |
31 |
1.4% |
0.01406534 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.0% |
0.01996370 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlser_5
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with public services: Home care service for the elderly and
people with disabilities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
How satisfied are you with the quality of the following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Home care service for the elderly and people with disabilities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Shown on the same page as [r25_mlseq_1_1] - [r25_mlseq_6_3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
48 |
2.2% |
0.02177858 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
375 |
17.0% |
0.17014519 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
408 |
18.5% |
0.18511797 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
644 |
29.2% |
0.29219601 |
| 5 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
397 |
18.0% |
0.18012704 |
| 6 |
Dissatisfied |
216 |
9.8% |
0.09800363 |
| 7 |
Very dissatisfied |
66 |
3.0% |
0.02994555 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
2.3% |
0.02268603 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlser_6
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with public services: Patient transport (e.g. by ambulance,
taxi, helicopter)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
How satisfied are you with the quality of the following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Patient transport (e.g. by ambulance, taxi, helicopter)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Shown on the same page as [r25_mlseq_1_1] - [r25_mlseq_6_3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
121 |
5.5% |
0.05490018 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
618 |
28.0% |
0.28039927 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
332 |
15.1% |
0.15063521 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
716 |
32.5% |
0.32486388 |
| 5 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
203 |
9.2% |
0.09210526 |
| 6 |
Dissatisfied |
112 |
5.1% |
0.05081670 |
| 7 |
Very dissatisfied |
43 |
2.0% |
0.01950998 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
2.7% |
0.02676951 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for primary and lower
secondary school: the municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for primary and lower
secondary school: the municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1627 |
73.8% |
0.73820327 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
547 |
24.8% |
0.24818512 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for primary and lower
secondary school: the county municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for primary and lower
secondary school: the county municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
367 |
16.7% |
0.16651543 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1807 |
82.0% |
0.81987296 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for primary and lower
secondary school: the state
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for primary and lower
secondary school: the state
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
513 |
23.3% |
0.23275862 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1661 |
75.4% |
0.75362976 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for upper secondary
school: the municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for upper secondary
school: the municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
315 |
14.3% |
0.14292196 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1859 |
84.3% |
0.84346642 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for upper secondary
school: the county municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for upper secondary
school: the county municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1602 |
72.7% |
0.72686025 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
572 |
26.0% |
0.25952813 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for upper secondary
school: the state
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for upper secondary
school: the state
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
565 |
25.6% |
0.25635209 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1609 |
73.0% |
0.73003630 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for higher education: the
municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for higher education: the
municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
100 |
4.5% |
0.04537205 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
2074 |
94.1% |
0.94101633 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for higher education: the
county municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for higher education: the
county municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
576 |
26.1% |
0.26134301 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1598 |
72.5% |
0.72504537 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for higher education: the
state
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for higher education: the
state
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1728 |
78.4% |
0.78402904 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
446 |
20.2% |
0.20235935 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for hospitals: the
municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for hospitals: the
municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
188 |
8.5% |
0.08529946 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1986 |
90.1% |
0.90108893 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for hospitals: the county
municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for hospitals: the county
municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
752 |
34.1% |
0.34119782 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1422 |
64.5% |
0.64519056 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_4_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for hospitals: the state
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for hospitals: the state
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1611 |
73.1% |
0.73094374 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
563 |
25.5% |
0.25544465 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for home care service for
the elderly and people with disabilities: the municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for home care service for
the elderly and people with disabilities: the municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1822 |
82.7% |
0.82667877 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
352 |
16.0% |
0.15970962 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for home care service for
the elderly and people with disabilities: the county municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for home care service for
the elderly and people with disabilities: the county municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
287 |
13.0% |
0.13021779 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1887 |
85.6% |
0.85617060 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for home care service for
the elderly and people with disabilities: the state
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for home care service for
the elderly and people with disabilities: the state
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
408 |
18.5% |
0.18511797 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1766 |
80.1% |
0.80127042 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for patient transport:
the municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for patient transport:
the municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
657 |
29.8% |
0.29809437 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1517 |
68.8% |
0.68829401 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for patient transport:
the county municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for patient transport:
the county municipality
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1039 |
47.1% |
0.47141561 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1135 |
51.5% |
0.51497278 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_mlseq_6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for patient transport:
the state
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which
you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the
authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for
the quality of these public services.
Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the
following public services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Responsible for the quality of public services for patient transport:
the state
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a
combination of these.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
846 |
38.4% |
0.38384755 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1328 |
60.3% |
0.60254083 |
| 97 |
|
30 |
1.4% |
0.01361162 |
| 98 |
|
11536 |
|
NA |
r25_dvrepx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects which group the respondents will belong to.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8966] [Invalid:4774]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx1] |
992 |
11.1% |
0.1106402 |
| 2 |
Group 2: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx2] |
1002 |
11.2% |
0.1117555 |
| 3 |
Group 3: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx3] |
988 |
11.0% |
0.1101941 |
| 4 |
Group 4: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx4] |
1016 |
11.3% |
0.1133170 |
| 5 |
Group 5: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx5] |
973 |
10.9% |
0.1085211 |
| 6 |
Group 6: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx6] |
994 |
11.1% |
0.1108633 |
| 7 |
Group 7: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx7] |
981 |
10.9% |
0.1094133 |
| 8 |
Group 8: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx8] |
981 |
10.9% |
0.1094133 |
| 9 |
Group 9: Control group |
1039 |
11.6% |
0.1158822 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4774 |
|
NA |
r25_dvrepx1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: limit the opportunities for family reunification
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election
period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again
experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a
speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address
this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration
policies substantially.
|
|
Literal question:
|
A main policy would be to limit the opportunities for family
reunification.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 1 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
146 |
14.7% |
0.147177419 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
253 |
25.5% |
0.255040323 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
330 |
33.3% |
0.332661290 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
260 |
26.2% |
0.262096774 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.003024194 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12748 |
|
NA |
r25_dvrepx2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: cuts in financial support for asylum seekers at
reception centres
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election
period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again
experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a
speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address
this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration
policies substantially.
|
|
Literal question:
|
A main policy would be cuts in financial support for asylum seekers
living at asylum reception centres. To what extent do you agree or
disagree with the following proposal?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 2 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
93 |
9.3% |
0.092814371 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
245 |
24.5% |
0.244510978 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
344 |
34.3% |
0.343313373 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
319 |
31.8% |
0.318363273 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000998004 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12738 |
|
NA |
r25_dvrepx3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: stricter language requirements in Norwegian in order to
be granted citizenship
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election
period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again
experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a
speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address
this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration
policies substantially.
|
|
Literal question:
|
A main policy would be stricter language requirements in Norwegian in
order to be granted citizenship. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following proposal?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 3 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
281 |
28.4% |
0.284412955 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
374 |
37.9% |
0.378542510 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
216 |
21.9% |
0.218623482 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
112 |
11.3% |
0.113360324 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.5% |
0.005060729 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12752 |
|
NA |
r25_dvrepx4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: limit the opportunities for family reunification, cuts
in financial support for asylum seekers at asylum reception centres and
stricter language requirements in Norwegian in order to be granted
citizenship
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election
period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again
experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a
speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address
this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration
policies substantially.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The main policies would be to limit the opportunities for family
reunification, cuts in financial support for asylum seekers at asylum
reception centres and stricter language requirements in Norwegian in
order to be granted citizenship. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following proposal?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 4 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
171 |
16.8% |
0.168307087 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
328 |
32.3% |
0.322834646 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
277 |
27.3% |
0.272637795 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
238 |
23.4% |
0.234251969 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001968504 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12724 |
|
NA |
r25_dvrepx5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: extend the opportunities for family reunification
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election
period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again
experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a
speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address
this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration
policies substantially.
|
|
Literal question:
|
A main policy would be to extend the opportunities for family
reunification. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the
following proposal?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 5 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
221 |
22.7% |
0.227132580 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
421 |
43.3% |
0.432682425 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
210 |
21.6% |
0.215827338 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
115 |
11.8% |
0.118191161 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.6% |
0.006166495 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12767 |
|
NA |
r25_dvrepx6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: increase in financial support for asylum seekers in
asylum reception centres
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election
period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again
experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a
speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address
this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration
policies substantially.
|
|
Literal question:
|
A main policy would be increase in financial support for asylum seekers
living at asylum reception centres. To what extent do you agree or
disagree with the following proposal?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 6 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
243 |
24.4% |
0.244466801 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
466 |
46.9% |
0.468812877 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
181 |
18.2% |
0.182092555 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
101 |
10.2% |
0.101609658 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.003018109 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12746 |
|
NA |
r25_dvrepx7
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: simpler language requirements in Norwegian in order to
be granted citizenship
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election
period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again
experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a
speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address
this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration
policies substantially.
|
|
Literal question:
|
A main policy would be simpler language requirements in Norwegian in
order to be granted citizenship. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following proposal?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 7 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
141 |
14.4% |
0.143730887 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
301 |
30.7% |
0.306829766 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
295 |
30.1% |
0.300713558 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
240 |
24.5% |
0.244648318 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.4% |
0.004077472 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12759 |
|
NA |
r25_dvrepx8
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: expand the opportunities for family reunification,
increase in financial support for asylum seekers living at
asylumreception centres and simpler language requirements in Norwegian
in order to be granted citizenship
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election
period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again
experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a
speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address
this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration
policies substantially.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The main policies would be to expand the opportunities for family
reunification, increase the financial support for asylum seekers living
at asylum reception centres and simpler language requirements in
Norwegian in order to be granted citizenship. To what extent do you
agree or disagree with the following proposal?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 8 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
151 |
15.4% |
0.153924567 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
424 |
43.2% |
0.432212029 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
267 |
27.2% |
0.272171254 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
138 |
14.1% |
0.140672783 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001019368 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12759 |
|
NA |
r25_dveas_pipe1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dveas_pipe2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r25_dvrepx_ran] = 1 | 2 | 3 |4 the value is set to 1. If
[r25_dvrepx_ran] = 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 the value is set to 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7924] [Invalid:5816]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
tightening |
3997 |
50.4% |
0.504417 |
| 2 |
relaxation |
3927 |
49.6% |
0.495583 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5816 |
|
NA |
r25_dveas_pipe2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dveas] and
[r25_dvcas]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r25_dvrepx_ran] = 1 | 2 | 3 |4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 the value is set to
1. Hvis [r25_dvrepx_ran] == 9 settes verdien til 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8963] [Invalid:4777]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
With such a [r25_dveas_pipe1] immigration and integration policy would |
7924 |
88.4% |
0.884079 |
| 2 |
Would |
1039 |
11.6% |
0.115921 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4777 |
|
NA |
r25_dveas
|
Variable label:
|
[r25_dveas_pipe2] good or bad for the Norwegian economy that asylum
seekers come from other countries settle here
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r25_dveas_pipe2] you say that it is good or bad for the Norwegian
economy that asylum seekers come from other countries settle here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 – Bad for the economy |
644 |
7.1% |
0.07084708 |
| 1 |
1 |
253 |
2.8% |
0.02783278 |
| 2 |
2 |
487 |
5.4% |
0.05357536 |
| 3 |
3 |
809 |
8.9% |
0.08899890 |
| 4 |
4 |
907 |
10.0% |
0.09977998 |
| 5 |
5 |
2171 |
23.9% |
0.23883388 |
| 6 |
6 |
1060 |
11.7% |
0.11661166 |
| 7 |
7 |
1195 |
13.1% |
0.13146315 |
| 8 |
8 |
815 |
9.0% |
0.08965897 |
| 9 |
9 |
186 |
2.0% |
0.02046205 |
| 10 |
10 – Good for the economy |
389 |
4.3% |
0.04279428 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
174 |
1.9% |
0.01914191 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4650 |
|
NA |
r25_dvcas
|
Variable label:
|
[r25_dveas_pipe2] Norwegian culture is undermined or enriched by asylum
seekers who come from other countries to settle here
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r25_dveas_pipe2] you say that Norwegian culture is undermined or
enriched by asylum seekers who come from other countries to settle here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 – Norwegian culture would be undermined |
586 |
6.4% |
0.06446645 |
| 1 |
1 |
252 |
2.8% |
0.02772277 |
| 2 |
2 |
420 |
4.6% |
0.04620462 |
| 3 |
3 |
645 |
7.1% |
0.07095710 |
| 4 |
4 |
661 |
7.3% |
0.07271727 |
| 5 |
5 |
1746 |
19.2% |
0.19207921 |
| 6 |
6 |
983 |
10.8% |
0.10814081 |
| 7 |
7 |
1274 |
14.0% |
0.14015402 |
| 8 |
8 |
1075 |
11.8% |
0.11826183 |
| 9 |
9 |
355 |
3.9% |
0.03905391 |
| 10 |
10 – Norwegian culture would be enriched |
892 |
9.8% |
0.09812981 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
201 |
2.2% |
0.02211221 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4650 |
|
NA |
r25_pccop
|
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
82 |
3.4% |
0.034095634 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
887 |
36.9% |
0.368814969 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
967 |
40.2% |
0.402079002 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
371 |
15.4% |
0.154261954 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
95 |
4.0% |
0.039501040 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001247401 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_pccos
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
196 |
8.1% |
0.08149688 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
1086 |
45.2% |
0.45155925 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
763 |
31.7% |
0.31725572 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
267 |
11.1% |
0.11101871 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
67 |
2.8% |
0.02785863 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.1% |
0.01081081 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_pccom
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
161 |
6.7% |
0.066943867 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
1052 |
43.7% |
0.437422037 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
912 |
37.9% |
0.379209979 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
220 |
9.1% |
0.091476091 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
41 |
1.7% |
0.017047817 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.8% |
0.007900208 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_metnc_1
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in the following Norwegian media: Finansavisen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you have confidence in the following Norwegian media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Finansavisen
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
96 |
4.0% |
0.039916840 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
701 |
29.1% |
0.291476091 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
549 |
22.8% |
0.228274428 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
88 |
3.7% |
0.036590437 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
33 |
1.4% |
0.013721414 |
| 6 |
Not familiar with this medium |
919 |
38.2% |
0.382120582 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.8% |
0.007900208 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_metnc_2
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in the following Norwegian media: VG
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you have confidence in the following Norwegian media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
VG
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
71 |
3.0% |
0.029521830 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
549 |
22.8% |
0.228274428 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
1147 |
47.7% |
0.476923077 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
477 |
19.8% |
0.198336798 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
85 |
3.5% |
0.035343035 |
| 6 |
Not familiar with this medium |
57 |
2.4% |
0.023700624 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.8% |
0.007900208 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_metnc_3
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in the following Norwegian media: Resett
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you have confidence in the following Norwegian media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Resett
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
12 |
0.5% |
0.004989605 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
57 |
2.4% |
0.023700624 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
172 |
7.2% |
0.071517672 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
283 |
11.8% |
0.117671518 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
440 |
18.3% |
0.182952183 |
| 6 |
Not familiar with this medium |
1415 |
58.8% |
0.588357588 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.1% |
0.010810811 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_metnc_4
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in the following Norwegian media: Klassekampen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you have confidence in the following Norwegian media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Klassekampen
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
107 |
4.4% |
0.044490644 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
515 |
21.4% |
0.214137214 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
575 |
23.9% |
0.239085239 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
201 |
8.4% |
0.083575884 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
104 |
4.3% |
0.043243243 |
| 6 |
Not familiar with this medium |
882 |
36.7% |
0.366735967 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.9% |
0.008731809 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_pccoo
|
Variable label:
|
Most people in general can be trusted
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
25 |
1.0% |
0.010395010 |
| 1 |
1 |
16 |
0.7% |
0.006652807 |
| 2 |
2 |
36 |
1.5% |
0.014968815 |
| 3 |
3 |
87 |
3.6% |
0.036174636 |
| 4 |
4 |
89 |
3.7% |
0.037006237 |
| 5 |
5 |
242 |
10.1% |
0.100623701 |
| 6 |
6 |
291 |
12.1% |
0.120997921 |
| 7 |
7 |
568 |
23.6% |
0.236174636 |
| 8 |
8 |
586 |
24.4% |
0.243659044 |
| 9 |
9 |
224 |
9.3% |
0.093139293 |
| 10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
237 |
9.9% |
0.098544699 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001663202 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_pcsad
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
536 |
22.3% |
0.222869023 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1202 |
50.0% |
0.499792100 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
440 |
18.3% |
0.182952183 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
167 |
6.9% |
0.069438669 |
| 5 |
Very dissatisfied |
48 |
2.0% |
0.019958420 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.5% |
0.004989605 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_pcsal
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with life
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
728 |
30.3% |
0.302702703 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1311 |
54.5% |
0.545114345 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
270 |
11.2% |
0.112266112 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
64 |
2.7% |
0.026611227 |
| 5 |
Very dissatisfied |
21 |
0.9% |
0.008731809 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004573805 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_pcsaf
|
Variable label:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has your local environment become
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past
couple of years.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much safer |
68 |
2.8% |
0.028274428 |
| 2 |
Somewhat safer |
263 |
10.9% |
0.109355509 |
| 3 |
No change in safity |
1465 |
60.9% |
0.609147609 |
| 4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
532 |
22.1% |
0.221205821 |
| 5 |
Much more unsafe |
66 |
2.7% |
0.027442827 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004573805 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_pcmip_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (1)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
1:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_pcmip_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (2)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
2:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_pcmip_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (3)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
3:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_pcvot21
|
Variable label:
|
Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in
2021
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in
2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
65 |
2.7% |
0.02702703 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
447 |
18.6% |
0.18586279 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
153 |
6.4% |
0.06361746 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
116 |
4.8% |
0.04823285 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
174 |
7.2% |
0.07234927 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
245 |
10.2% |
0.10187110 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
138 |
5.7% |
0.05738046 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
549 |
22.8% |
0.22827443 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
147 |
6.1% |
0.06112266 |
| 10 |
Other: |
62 |
2.6% |
0.02577963 |
| 11 |
Did not vote |
115 |
4.8% |
0.04781705 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
146 |
6.1% |
0.06070686 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
24 |
1.0% |
0.00997921 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.0% |
0.00997921 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_pcvot21_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary
elections in 2021
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in
2021
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_pcldk
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2343] [Invalid:11397]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
349 |
14.9% |
0.148954332 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
445 |
19.0% |
0.189927443 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
517 |
22.1% |
0.220657277 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
619 |
26.4% |
0.264191208 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
306 |
13.1% |
0.130601793 |
| 6 |
Really like |
86 |
3.7% |
0.036705079 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
21 |
0.9% |
0.008962868 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11397 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldh
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2343] [Invalid:11397]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
106 |
4.5% |
0.04524114 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
250 |
10.7% |
0.10670081 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
397 |
16.9% |
0.16944089 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
379 |
16.2% |
0.16175843 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
594 |
25.4% |
0.25352113 |
| 6 |
Really like |
478 |
20.4% |
0.20401195 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
139 |
5.9% |
0.05932565 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11397 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldf
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2341] [Invalid:11399]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
597 |
25.5% |
0.25501922 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
462 |
19.7% |
0.19735156 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
366 |
15.6% |
0.15634344 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
299 |
12.8% |
0.12772320 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
364 |
15.5% |
0.15548911 |
| 6 |
Really like |
186 |
7.9% |
0.07945323 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
67 |
2.9% |
0.02862025 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11399 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldv
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2332] [Invalid:11408]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
148 |
6.3% |
0.06346484 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
265 |
11.4% |
0.11363636 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
445 |
19.1% |
0.19082333 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
731 |
31.3% |
0.31346484 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
530 |
22.7% |
0.22727273 |
| 6 |
Really like |
179 |
7.7% |
0.07675815 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
34 |
1.5% |
0.01457976 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11408 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldsv
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Socialist Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2341] [Invalid:11399]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
240 |
10.3% |
0.10252029 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
308 |
13.2% |
0.13156771 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
395 |
16.9% |
0.16873131 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
539 |
23.0% |
0.23024349 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
474 |
20.2% |
0.20247757 |
| 6 |
Really like |
300 |
12.8% |
0.12815036 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
85 |
3.6% |
0.03630927 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11399 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldsp
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2340] [Invalid:11400]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
282 |
12.1% |
0.12051282 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
388 |
16.6% |
0.16581197 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
533 |
22.8% |
0.22777778 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
609 |
26.0% |
0.26025641 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
382 |
16.3% |
0.16324786 |
| 6 |
Really like |
123 |
5.3% |
0.05256410 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
23 |
1.0% |
0.00982906 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11400 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldm
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2343] [Invalid:11397]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
457 |
19.5% |
0.19504908 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
329 |
14.0% |
0.14041827 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
375 |
16.0% |
0.16005122 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
402 |
17.2% |
0.17157490 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
489 |
20.9% |
0.20870679 |
| 6 |
Really like |
239 |
10.2% |
0.10200598 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
52 |
2.2% |
0.02219377 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11397 |
|
NA |
r25_pclda
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2346] [Invalid:11394]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
187 |
8.0% |
0.07971014 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
247 |
10.5% |
0.10528559 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
415 |
17.7% |
0.17689685 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
329 |
14.0% |
0.14023870 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
682 |
29.1% |
0.29070759 |
| 6 |
Really like |
432 |
18.4% |
0.18414322 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
54 |
2.3% |
0.02301790 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11394 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldr
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2341] [Invalid:11399]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
374 |
16.0% |
0.15976079 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
352 |
15.0% |
0.15036309 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
386 |
16.5% |
0.16488680 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
455 |
19.4% |
0.19436138 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
454 |
19.4% |
0.19393422 |
| 6 |
Really like |
242 |
10.3% |
0.10337463 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
78 |
3.3% |
0.03331909 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11399 |
|
NA |
r25_bglrs
|
Variable label:
|
Personal placement on political left and right wing scale
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right
wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left
politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Respondent answered with the help of a slider]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2298] [Invalid:11442]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 – Left wing |
74 |
3.2% |
0.03220191 |
| 1 |
1 |
130 |
5.7% |
0.05657093 |
| 2 |
2 |
193 |
8.4% |
0.08398607 |
| 3 |
3 |
280 |
12.2% |
0.12184508 |
| 4 |
4 |
272 |
11.8% |
0.11836379 |
| 5 |
5 |
405 |
17.6% |
0.17624021 |
| 6 |
6 |
247 |
10.7% |
0.10748477 |
| 7 |
7 |
298 |
13.0% |
0.12967798 |
| 8 |
8 |
221 |
9.6% |
0.09617058 |
| 9 |
9 |
92 |
4.0% |
0.04003481 |
| 10 |
10 – Right wing |
86 |
3.7% |
0.03742385 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11442 |
|
NA |
r25_pcimm
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
116 |
4.8% |
0.04823285 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
448 |
18.6% |
0.18627859 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
903 |
37.5% |
0.37546778 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
421 |
17.5% |
0.17505198 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
341 |
14.2% |
0.14178794 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
96 |
4.0% |
0.03991684 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
45 |
1.9% |
0.01871102 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.5% |
0.01455301 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_pcpin
|
Variable label:
|
How interested are you in politics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
274 |
11.4% |
0.11392931 |
| 2 |
Interested |
950 |
39.5% |
0.39501040 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
787 |
32.7% |
0.32723493 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
299 |
12.4% |
0.12432432 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
62 |
2.6% |
0.02577963 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.4% |
0.01372141 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_pcter
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
152 |
6.3% |
0.06320166 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
401 |
16.7% |
0.16673597 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
1005 |
41.8% |
0.41787942 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
682 |
28.4% |
0.28357588 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
123 |
5.1% |
0.05114345 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
1.7% |
0.01746362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_metnsx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects which group the respondent will belong to.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2375] [Invalid:11365]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 (Finansavisen, control) |
573 |
24.1% |
0.2412632 |
| 2 |
Group 2 (Klassekampen, control) |
599 |
25.2% |
0.2522105 |
| 3 |
Group 3 (Finansavisen, treatment) |
607 |
25.6% |
0.2555789 |
| 4 |
Group 4 (Klassekampen, treatment) |
596 |
25.1% |
0.2509474 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11365 |
|
NA |
r25_metnsx_pipe
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_metnsx1] -
[r25_metnsx4], and [r25_metnpx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r25_metnsx_ran] = 1 | 3 the value is set to 1. If [r25_metnsx_ran]
= 2 | 4 the value is set to 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2375] [Invalid:11365]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Finansavisen |
1180 |
49.7% |
0.4968421 |
| 2 |
Klassekampen |
1195 |
50.3% |
0.5031579 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11365 |
|
NA |
r25_metnsx1
|
Variable label:
|
Level of reliability: article published by Finansavisen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at this article published by Finansavisen
[image of news article posted on social media]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think that this news is reliable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_metnsx_ran = 1 & r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
15 |
2.6% |
0.02617801 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
106 |
18.5% |
0.18499127 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
236 |
41.2% |
0.41186736 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
166 |
29.0% |
0.28970332 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
39 |
6.8% |
0.06806283 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.9% |
0.01919721 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13167 |
|
NA |
r25_metnsx2
|
Variable label:
|
Level of reliability: article published by Klassekampen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at this article published by Klassekampen
[image of news article posted on social media]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think that this news is reliable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_metnsx_ran = 2 & r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
18 |
3.0% |
0.03005008 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
125 |
20.9% |
0.20868114 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
245 |
40.9% |
0.40901503 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
166 |
27.7% |
0.27712855 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
32 |
5.3% |
0.05342237 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
2.2% |
0.02170284 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13141 |
|
NA |
r25_metnsx3
|
Variable label:
|
Level of reliability: article published by Finansavisen and shared by a
politican from the Labour party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at this article published by Finansavisen and consider it being
shared and commented on by a fictional politician from the Labour
Party.
[image of news article posted on social media]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please read carefully and then answer the extent to which you find this
news reliable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_metnsx_ran = 3 & r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
17 |
2.8% |
0.02800659 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
72 |
11.9% |
0.11861614 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
265 |
43.7% |
0.43657331 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
187 |
30.8% |
0.30807249 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
38 |
6.3% |
0.06260297 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
4.6% |
0.04612850 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13133 |
|
NA |
r25_metnsx4
|
Variable label:
|
Level of reliability: article published by Klassekampen and shared by a
politician from The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at this article published by Klassekampen and consider it being
shared and commented on by a fictional politician from the Progress
Party.
[image of news article posted on social media]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please read carefully and then answer the extent to which you find this
news reliable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_metnsx_ran = 4 & r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
15 |
2.5% |
0.02516779 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
90 |
15.1% |
0.15100671 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
237 |
39.8% |
0.39765101 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
188 |
31.5% |
0.31543624 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
35 |
5.9% |
0.05872483 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
5.2% |
0.05201342 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
13144 |
|
NA |
r25_metpox
|
Variable label:
|
Based on your spontaneous impression: to what extent do you like or
dislike this politician?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on your spontaneous impression: to what extent do you like or
dislike this politician?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_metnsx_ran = 3,4 & r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly like |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003325021 |
| 2 |
Significantly like |
24 |
2.0% |
0.019950125 |
| 3 |
Somewhat like |
90 |
7.5% |
0.074812968 |
| 4 |
Neither like nor dislike |
572 |
47.5% |
0.475477972 |
| 5 |
Somewhat dislike |
244 |
20.3% |
0.202826268 |
| 6 |
Dislike a lot |
157 |
13.1% |
0.130507066 |
| 7 |
Strongly dislike |
41 |
3.4% |
0.034081463 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
5.9% |
0.059019119 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12537 |
|
NA |
r25_metnpx
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you have confidence in [r25_metnsx_pipe]?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you have confidence in [r25_metnsx_pipe]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
58 |
2.4% |
0.02411642 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
516 |
21.5% |
0.21455301 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
1141 |
47.4% |
0.47442827 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
416 |
17.3% |
0.17297297 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
135 |
5.6% |
0.05613306 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
139 |
5.8% |
0.05779626 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_1
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Respect for parents and for older people is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that [he/she] should always show respect for [him/her]
parents and for older people. It’s important to [his/hers] to be
obedient.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
253 |
10.5% |
0.10519751 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
536 |
22.3% |
0.22286902 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
809 |
33.6% |
0.33638254 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
418 |
17.4% |
0.17380457 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
216 |
9.0% |
0.08981289 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03492723 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
3.7% |
0.03700624 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_2
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Religious faith is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do
what [him/her] religion requires.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
41 |
1.7% |
0.01704782 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
77 |
3.2% |
0.03201663 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
185 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
310 |
12.9% |
0.12889813 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
460 |
19.1% |
0.19126819 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
1241 |
51.6% |
0.51600832 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
91 |
3.8% |
0.03783784 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_3
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To help people around you is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She]
wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
536 |
22.3% |
0.222869023 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
848 |
35.3% |
0.352598753 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
789 |
32.8% |
0.328066528 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
129 |
5.4% |
0.053638254 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
16 |
0.7% |
0.006652807 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001663202 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
3.5% |
0.034511435 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_4
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have all people in the world be treated equally is
important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated
equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in
life.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
656 |
27.3% |
0.272765073 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
836 |
34.8% |
0.347609148 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
632 |
26.3% |
0.262785863 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
129 |
5.4% |
0.053638254 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
52 |
2.2% |
0.021621622 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
13 |
0.5% |
0.005405405 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
3.6% |
0.036174636 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_5
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be interested in things and to be curious is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She]
likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
506 |
21.0% |
0.210395010 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
784 |
32.6% |
0.325987526 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
749 |
31.1% |
0.311434511 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
215 |
8.9% |
0.089397089 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
51 |
2.1% |
0.021205821 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
13 |
0.5% |
0.005405405 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
3.6% |
0.036174636 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_6
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take risks and look for new experiences is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new
experiences.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
69 |
2.9% |
0.02869023 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
233 |
9.7% |
0.09688150 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
578 |
24.0% |
0.24033264 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
782 |
32.5% |
0.32515593 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
466 |
19.4% |
0.19376299 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
190 |
7.9% |
0.07900208 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
3.6% |
0.03617464 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_7
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To seek out opportunites to have fun is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for
[his/hers] to do things that give [his/hers] pleasure.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
147 |
6.1% |
0.06112266 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
345 |
14.3% |
0.14345114 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
903 |
37.5% |
0.37546778 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
617 |
25.7% |
0.25654886 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
236 |
9.8% |
0.09812890 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
74 |
3.1% |
0.03076923 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
3.5% |
0.03451143 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_8
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be sucessful and to impress other people is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress
other people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
85 |
3.5% |
0.03534304 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
260 |
10.8% |
0.10810811 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
671 |
27.9% |
0.27900208 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
685 |
28.5% |
0.28482328 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
411 |
17.1% |
0.17089397 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
204 |
8.5% |
0.08482328 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
3.7% |
0.03700624 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_9
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take the lead and tell others what to do is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to
do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
29 |
1.2% |
0.01205821 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
150 |
6.2% |
0.06237006 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
577 |
24.0% |
0.23991684 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
750 |
31.2% |
0.31185031 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
512 |
21.3% |
0.21288981 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
297 |
12.3% |
0.12349272 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
3.7% |
0.03742204 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_10
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have things tidy and clean is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She]
really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
385 |
16.0% |
0.16008316 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
677 |
28.1% |
0.28149688 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
771 |
32.1% |
0.32058212 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
345 |
14.3% |
0.14345114 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
105 |
4.4% |
0.04365904 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
34 |
1.4% |
0.01413721 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
88 |
3.7% |
0.03659044 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgedu
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the highest level of completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004158004 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
120 |
5.0% |
0.049896050 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
247 |
10.3% |
0.102702703 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
340 |
14.1% |
0.141372141 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
228 |
9.5% |
0.094802495 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
158 |
6.6% |
0.065696466 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
459 |
19.1% |
0.190852391 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
177 |
7.4% |
0.073596674 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
165 |
6.9% |
0.068607069 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of
Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of
Science in Business and Economics)) |
349 |
14.5% |
0.145114345 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
56 |
2.3% |
0.023284823 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
20 |
0.8% |
0.008316008 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
76 |
3.2% |
0.031600832 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgedu_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education: None of the above
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is the highest level of completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
None of the above
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_bginc
|
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your current income?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
<150 000 |
166 |
6.9% |
0.06902287 |
| 2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
285 |
11.9% |
0.11850312 |
| 3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
295 |
12.3% |
0.12266112 |
| 4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
323 |
13.4% |
0.13430353 |
| 5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
359 |
14.9% |
0.14927235 |
| 6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
314 |
13.1% |
0.13056133 |
| 7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
386 |
16.0% |
0.16049896 |
| 8 |
>1 000000 |
169 |
7.0% |
0.07027027 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
108 |
4.5% |
0.04490644 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgday
|
Variable label:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one alternative
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
1132 |
47.1% |
0.470686071 |
| 2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
89 |
3.7% |
0.037006237 |
| 3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
94 |
3.9% |
0.039085239 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
93 |
3.9% |
0.038669439 |
| 5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
133 |
5.5% |
0.055301455 |
| 6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
30 |
1.2% |
0.012474012 |
| 7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004573805 |
| 8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
142 |
5.9% |
0.059043659 |
| 9 |
Retired |
523 |
21.7% |
0.217463617 |
| 10 |
In military service |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002494802 |
| 11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
18 |
0.7% |
0.007484407 |
| 12 |
Other: |
56 |
2.3% |
0.023284823 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
78 |
3.2% |
0.032432432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgday_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have
been doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one alternative
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_bgwor
|
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bgday = 1,2,3 & r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
158 |
12.0% |
0.120152091 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
399 |
30.3% |
0.303422053 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
70 |
5.3% |
0.053231939 |
| 4 |
Private business |
643 |
48.9% |
0.488973384 |
| 5 |
Self-employed |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005323194 |
| 6 |
Other: |
35 |
2.7% |
0.026615970 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002281369 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12425 |
|
NA |
r25_bgwor_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which type of business do you work/worked in?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which type of business do you work/worked in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bgday = 1,2,3 & r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_bgupm_sok
|
Variable label:
|
NA
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15
years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you
turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the
year.
Old and new municipality names
We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list
below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that
still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of
the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the
municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in
2020 are not included in the list.
Why is my municipality listed several times?
Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for
example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If
you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose
“Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Enter the name of the municipality you lived in, and then select from
the list of search results.
|
|
Post-question:
|
If the municipality is not on the list, try checking if the name is
spelled correctly in the search box
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_bgupm
|
Variable label:
|
Municipality of residence at age 15.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15
years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you
turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the
year.
Old and new municipality names
We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list
below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that
still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of
the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the
municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in
2020 are not included in the list.
Why is my municipality listed several times?
Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for
example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If
you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose
“Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which municipality did you live in when you were 15?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If the municipality is not on the list, try checking if the name is
spelled correctly in the search box
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r25_bgupm_sok is answered & !(r25_bgupm_utland is
answered | r25_bgupm_mangler is answered)) & r25_group = 6]
[Answer list based on response in Filter(“r25_bgupm”,
f(“r25_bgupm_sok”).get())]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_bgupm_utland_1
|
Variable label:
|
Municipality of residence: Did not live in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15
years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you
turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the
year.
Old and new municipality names
We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list
below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that
still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of
the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the
municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in
2020 are not included in the list.
Why is my municipality listed several times?
Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for
example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If
you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose
“Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I didn’t live in Norway the year I turned 15
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bgupm_mangler ikke is answered & r25_group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_bgupm_mangler_2
|
Variable label:
|
Municipality of residence: Municipality not listed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15
years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you
turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the
year.
Old and new municipality names
We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list
below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that
still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of
the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the
municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in
2020 are not included in the list.
Why is my municipality listed several times?
Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for
example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If
you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose
“Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I can’t find my municipality on the list
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bgupm_utland ikke is answered & r25_group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_bgupm_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Municipality of residence at age 15
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15
years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you
turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the
year.
Old and new municipality names
We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list
below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that
still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of
the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the
municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in
2020 are not included in the list.
Why is my municipality listed several times?
Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for
example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If
you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose
“Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
When I was 15, I lived in this municipality:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bgupm_mangler is answered & r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_bgupc
|
Variable label:
|
Respondents home county at 15 years of age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r25_bgupm]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:1944] [Invalid:11796]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
162 |
8.3% |
0.08333333 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
185 |
9.5% |
0.09516461 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
115 |
5.9% |
0.05915638 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
119 |
6.1% |
0.06121399 |
| 30 |
Viken |
405 |
20.8% |
0.20833333 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
151 |
7.8% |
0.07767490 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
153 |
7.9% |
0.07870370 |
| 42 |
Agder |
108 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
290 |
14.9% |
0.14917695 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
177 |
9.1% |
0.09104938 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
79 |
4.1% |
0.04063786 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11796 |
|
NA |
r25_bgciv
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your marital status?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Check what fits the best
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
361 |
15.0% |
0.150103950 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
152 |
6.3% |
0.063201663 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
440 |
18.3% |
0.182952183 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
1167 |
48.5% |
0.485239085 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
128 |
5.3% |
0.053222453 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
67 |
2.8% |
0.027858628 |
| 7 |
Other: |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002079002 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
85 |
3.5% |
0.035343035 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgciv_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Marital status
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_bgchi
|
Variable label:
|
Living with children under 16 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you,
and if so, how many?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
None |
1780 |
74.0% |
0.7401247401 |
| 1 |
1 |
250 |
10.4% |
0.1039501040 |
| 2 |
2 |
204 |
8.5% |
0.0848232848 |
| 3 |
3 |
67 |
2.8% |
0.0278586279 |
| 4 |
4 |
8 |
0.3% |
0.0033264033 |
| 5 |
5 |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0004158004 |
| 6 |
6 or more |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0004158004 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
94 |
3.9% |
0.0390852391 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgcla
|
Variable label:
|
Social class, personal placement.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups
or classes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it
be?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lower class |
33 |
1.4% |
0.013721414 |
| 2 |
Working class |
349 |
14.5% |
0.145114345 |
| 3 |
Lower middle class |
256 |
10.6% |
0.106444906 |
| 4 |
Middle class |
1172 |
48.7% |
0.487318087 |
| 5 |
Upper middle class |
378 |
15.7% |
0.157172557 |
| 6 |
Upper class |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002494802 |
| 7 |
Do not know |
122 |
5.1% |
0.050727651 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
3.7% |
0.037006237 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgrel
|
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_bgrelrecode
|
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [Recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
1303 |
54.2% |
0.54178794 |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
33 |
1.4% |
0.01372141 |
| 3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
107 |
4.4% |
0.04449064 |
| 4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
31 |
1.3% |
0.01288981 |
| 5 |
Islam |
29 |
1.2% |
0.01205821 |
| 6 |
Do not belong to any religion or religious denominations |
814 |
33.8% |
0.33846154 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
88 |
3.7% |
0.03659044 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgrem
|
Variable label:
|
How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12
months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often
have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001247401 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
21 |
0.9% |
0.008731809 |
| 3 |
Once a week |
37 |
1.5% |
0.015384615 |
| 4 |
Once or a few times a month |
70 |
2.9% |
0.029106029 |
| 5 |
Several times a year |
196 |
8.1% |
0.081496881 |
| 6 |
Once a year |
293 |
12.2% |
0.121829522 |
| 7 |
Less than once a year |
404 |
16.8% |
0.167983368 |
| 8 |
Never |
1287 |
53.5% |
0.535135135 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
94 |
3.9% |
0.039085239 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgcit
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
2158 |
89.7% |
0.89729730 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
157 |
6.5% |
0.06528067 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
3.7% |
0.03742204 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgcit_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Citizen of another country
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_bgimm
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
2010 |
83.6% |
0.835758836 |
| 2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
200 |
8.3% |
0.083160083 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
21 |
0.9% |
0.008731809 |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
44 |
1.8% |
0.018295218 |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
38 |
1.6% |
0.015800416 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
92 |
3.8% |
0.038253638 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11335 |
|
NA |
r25_bgimh
|
Variable label:
|
Which country did you live in before you immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did you live in before you immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bgimm = 2 & r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_bgimp_m
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which country did your mother live in before your parents
immigrated?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did you parents live in (mother, father or both) before
they immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Mother:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bgimm = 3 & r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_bgimp_f
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which country did your father live in before your parents
immigrated?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did you parents live in (mother, father or both) before
they immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Father:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bgimm = 3 & r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_bgimpm
|
Variable label:
|
Open: In which country did your mother live before she immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your mother live before she immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bgimm = 4 & r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_bgimpf
|
Variable label:
|
Open: In which country did your father live before he immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your father live before he immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_bgimm = 5 & r25_group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_hecor
|
Variable label:
|
How likely do you think it is that you will be infected by the
coronavirus
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely do you think it is that you will be infected by the
coronavirus (or re-infected, if you have already had it)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25panel_1 = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly unlikely |
223 |
12.4% |
0.123751387 |
| 2 |
Fairly unlikely |
403 |
22.4% |
0.223640400 |
| 3 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
779 |
43.2% |
0.432297447 |
| 4 |
Fairly likely |
263 |
14.6% |
0.145948946 |
| 5 |
Highly likely |
125 |
6.9% |
0.069367370 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.5% |
0.004994451 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11938 |
|
NA |
r25_hecob
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I do my best to limit infection risks
|
|
Literal question:
|
I do my best to limit infection risks (washing hands frequently,
avoiding travel and situations involving contact with other people,
keeping a distance and avoiding touching things)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25panel_1 = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
98 |
5.4% |
0.05438402 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
364 |
20.2% |
0.20199778 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
527 |
29.2% |
0.29245283 |
| 4 |
Agree |
602 |
33.4% |
0.33407325 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
189 |
10.5% |
0.10488346 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.2% |
0.01220866 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11938 |
|
NA |
r25_hecvax_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_hecvax]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r25panel_1 = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1793] [Invalid:11947]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Consider the health authorities offering a vaccine against diseases like
COVID-19. Those who have the vaccine will more easily stay healthy and will
be able to live more as normal during a pandemic outbreak. It is therefore an
advantage if you decide to have the vaccination. |
453 |
25.3% |
0.2526492 |
| 2 |
Consider the health authorities offering a vaccine against diseases like
COVID-19. Those who have the vaccine will more easily stay healthy and will
be able to live more as normal during a pandemic outbreak. It is therefore
an advantage that as many people as possible in society choose to have the
vaccination. |
442 |
24.7% |
0.2465142 |
| 3 |
Consider that a new vaccine is offered against diseases like COVID-19. If many
people have the vaccine, it is less likely that a pandemic outbreak would have
a negative impact on society. It is therefore an advantage if you decide to have
the vaccination. |
451 |
25.2% |
0.2515337 |
| 4 |
Consider that a new vaccine is offered against diseases like COVID-19. If many
people have the vaccine, it is less likely that a pandemic outbreak would have a
negative impact on society. It is therefore an advantage that as many people as
possible in society choose to have the vaccination. |
447 |
24.9% |
0.2493028 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11947 |
|
NA |
r25_hecvax
|
Variable label:
|
Anyone wanting the vaccine must contact their GP and book an appointment
for a vaccination.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How sure are you that you want to have such a vaccine?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25panel_1 = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I would definitely have taken the vaccine |
951 |
52.8% |
0.527746948 |
| 2 |
I would probably have taken the vaccine |
521 |
28.9% |
0.289123196 |
| 3 |
I'm not sure if I would have taken the vaccine |
168 |
9.3% |
0.093229745 |
| 4 |
I would probably not have taken the vaccine |
90 |
5.0% |
0.049944506 |
| 5 |
I would definitely not have taken the vaccine |
63 |
3.5% |
0.034961154 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.5% |
0.004994451 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11938 |
|
NA |
r25_pcsag
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
254 |
1.8% |
0.018486172 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2994 |
21.8% |
0.217903930 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
4449 |
32.4% |
0.323799127 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
3923 |
28.6% |
0.285516739 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
2093 |
15.2% |
0.152328967 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.2% |
0.001965066 |
r25_pceco
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of: Your own financial situation today
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you assess your own financial situation today?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
1169 |
10.3% |
0.103131892 |
| 2 |
Good |
5368 |
47.4% |
0.473577415 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
1899 |
16.8% |
0.167534186 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
1581 |
13.9% |
0.139479488 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
828 |
7.3% |
0.073048081 |
| 6 |
Bad |
296 |
2.6% |
0.026113807 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
128 |
1.1% |
0.011292457 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
66 |
0.6% |
0.005822673 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2405 |
|
NA |
r25_pcecy
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of: Your own financial situation in a year
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you assess your own financial situation in a year?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much worse than today |
184 |
1.6% |
0.016232907 |
| 2 |
Worse than today |
2952 |
26.0% |
0.260432289 |
| 3 |
Neither worse nor better than today |
6986 |
61.6% |
0.616321129 |
| 4 |
Better than today |
1079 |
9.5% |
0.095191884 |
| 5 |
Much better than today |
82 |
0.7% |
0.007234230 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
0.5% |
0.004587561 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2405 |
|
NA |
r25_pcpar
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
361 |
2.6% |
0.026273654 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
3751 |
27.3% |
0.272998544 |
| 3 |
The Progressive Party |
1033 |
7.5% |
0.075181951 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
636 |
4.6% |
0.046288210 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1495 |
10.9% |
0.108806405 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
509 |
3.7% |
0.037045124 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
654 |
4.8% |
0.047598253 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2509 |
18.3% |
0.182605531 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
1016 |
7.4% |
0.073944687 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
311 |
2.3% |
0.022634643 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
525 |
3.8% |
0.038209607 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
273 |
2.0% |
0.019868996 |
| 13 |
Other: |
603 |
4.4% |
0.043886463 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
0.5% |
0.004657933 |
r25_pcpar_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:13740] [Range:-]
|
r25_pceum
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
1323 |
9.6% |
0.096288210 |
| 2 |
Positive |
2521 |
18.3% |
0.183478894 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
2042 |
14.9% |
0.148617176 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
1755 |
12.8% |
0.127729258 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
2097 |
15.3% |
0.152620087 |
| 6 |
Negative |
2193 |
16.0% |
0.159606987 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
1744 |
12.7% |
0.126928675 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
65 |
0.5% |
0.004730713 |
r25_innae
|
Variable label:
|
How do you rate the increased military presence of NATO in Eastern
Europe?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NATO has recently increased its military forces and military equipment
in Eastern Europe considerably.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you rate the increased military presence in Eastern Europe?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
4535 |
33.0% |
0.330058224 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
4768 |
34.7% |
0.347016012 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
1752 |
12.8% |
0.127510917 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
1229 |
8.9% |
0.089446870 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
894 |
6.5% |
0.065065502 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
451 |
3.3% |
0.032823872 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
111 |
0.8% |
0.008078603 |
r25_pcecs
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway? Do you
believe it is
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
1369 |
12.1% |
0.120776356 |
| 2 |
Good |
4118 |
36.3% |
0.363299515 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
2162 |
19.1% |
0.190736656 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
1097 |
9.7% |
0.096779885 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
1856 |
16.4% |
0.163740626 |
| 6 |
Bad |
572 |
5.0% |
0.050463167 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
136 |
1.2% |
0.011998236 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.2% |
0.002205558 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2405 |
|
NA |
r25_pcecz
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of: The financial situation in Norway in a year
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the financial situation in Norway in a year?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much worse than today |
287 |
2.5% |
0.025319806 |
| 2 |
Worse than today |
4897 |
43.2% |
0.432024702 |
| 3 |
Neither worse nor better than today |
4932 |
43.5% |
0.435112483 |
| 4 |
Better than today |
1126 |
9.9% |
0.099338333 |
| 5 |
Much better than today |
32 |
0.3% |
0.002823114 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
61 |
0.5% |
0.005381562 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2405 |
|
NA |
r25_bgurb
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] = 1 | 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
1205 |
26.1% |
0.26144500 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
826 |
17.9% |
0.17921458 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
1330 |
28.9% |
0.28856585 |
| 4 |
A village |
755 |
16.4% |
0.16380994 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
404 |
8.8% |
0.08765459 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
1.9% |
0.01931005 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9131 |
|
NA |
r25_bghea
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] = 3 | 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
511 |
10.9% |
0.10916471 |
| 2 |
Very good |
1502 |
32.1% |
0.32087161 |
| 3 |
Good |
1686 |
36.0% |
0.36017945 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
684 |
14.6% |
0.14612262 |
| 5 |
Poor |
202 |
4.3% |
0.04315317 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
96 |
2.1% |
0.02050844 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9059 |
|
NA |
r25_avslutt
|
Variable label:
|
Final comments
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have any feedback with regard to the survey? In that case you can
write it here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740]
[Range:-]
|
r25_P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
6886 |
50.1% |
0.5011645 |
| 2 |
Female |
6854 |
49.9% |
0.4988355 |
r25_P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
2079 |
15.1% |
0.15131004 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
5045 |
36.7% |
0.36717613 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
684 |
5.0% |
0.04978166 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
3796 |
27.6% |
0.27627365 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
1111 |
8.1% |
0.08085881 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
1025 |
7.5% |
0.07459971 |
r25_P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:3-54]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
2079 |
15.1% |
0.15131004 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
1275 |
9.3% |
0.09279476 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
581 |
4.2% |
0.04228530 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
514 |
3.7% |
0.03740902 |
| 30 |
Viken |
3191 |
23.2% |
0.23224163 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
790 |
5.7% |
0.05749636 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
1064 |
7.7% |
0.07743814 |
| 42 |
Agder |
684 |
5.0% |
0.04978166 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
1940 |
14.1% |
0.14119360 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
1111 |
8.1% |
0.08085881 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
511 |
3.7% |
0.03719068 |
r25_P3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Constituencies parliament election 2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Østfold |
671 |
4.9% |
0.048835517 |
| 1 |
Akershus |
1907 |
13.9% |
0.138791849 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
2079 |
15.1% |
0.151310044 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
421 |
3.1% |
0.030640466 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
369 |
2.7% |
0.026855895 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
613 |
4.5% |
0.044614265 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
679 |
4.9% |
0.049417758 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
385 |
2.8% |
0.028020378 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
251 |
1.8% |
0.018267831 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
433 |
3.2% |
0.031513828 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
1275 |
9.3% |
0.092794760 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
1697 |
12.4% |
0.123508006 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
243 |
1.8% |
0.017685590 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
581 |
4.2% |
0.042285298 |
| 16 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
871 |
6.3% |
0.063391557 |
| 15 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
240 |
1.7% |
0.017467249 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
514 |
3.7% |
0.037409025 |
| 18 |
Troms |
380 |
2.8% |
0.027656477 |
| 19 |
Finnmark |
131 |
1.0% |
0.009534207 |
r25_P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
662 |
4.8% |
0.04818049 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
4189 |
30.5% |
0.30487627 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
8577 |
62.4% |
0.62423581 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
312 |
2.3% |
0.02270742 |
r25_P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
38 |
0.3% |
0.002765648 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
624 |
4.5% |
0.045414847 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
1242 |
9.0% |
0.090393013 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1689 |
12.3% |
0.122925764 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
1252 |
9.1% |
0.091120815 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
1097 |
8.0% |
0.079839884 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2893 |
21.1% |
0.210553130 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
978 |
7.1% |
0.071179039 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
992 |
7.2% |
0.072197962 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
2270 |
16.5% |
0.165211063 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
347 |
2.5% |
0.025254731 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
164 |
1.2% |
0.011935953 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
154 |
1.1% |
0.011208151 |
r25_P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
290 |
2.1% |
0.02110626 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
2038 |
14.8% |
0.14832606 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
3348 |
24.4% |
0.24366812 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
3076 |
22.4% |
0.22387191 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
2219 |
16.1% |
0.16149927 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
1476 |
10.7% |
0.10742358 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
1293 |
9.4% |
0.09410480 |
r25_P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
5676 |
41.3% |
0.4131004 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
6771 |
49.3% |
0.4927948 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
1293 |
9.4% |
0.0941048 |
r25_Weight1stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, and age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation
report.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-0]
|
r25_Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, and age. See documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-7]
|
r25_Weight2stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, P4_1, and age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation
report.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13428] [Invalid:312]
[Range:0-0]
|
r25_Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1, and age. See documentation
report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-58]
|
r25_Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-4]
|
