Codebook

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Round 27

v-101 - 2023-08-31

Produced by ideas2evidence

Citation

Primary investigators

Name	Affiliation
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten	UiB
Stefan Dahlberg	UiB
Sina Storelv	UiB
Erla Løvseth	UiB
Lise Lund Bjånesøy	UiB
Hege Høivik Bye	UiB
Gisela Böhm	UiB
Thea Gregersen	NORCE
Erik Knudsen	UiB
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø	NORCE
Arjan Schakel	UiB
Endre Tvinnereim	UiB

Coordinating team

Name
Erla Løvseth
Sina Storelv
Silje Løseth

Producers

Name	Affiliation	Role
Øivind Skjervheim	ideas2evidence	Coordinator
Olav Bjørnebekk	ideas2evidence	Project team member
Joachim Wettergreen	ideas2evidence	Project team member
Ola Grendal	ideas2evidence	Project team member
Asle Høgestøl	ideas2evidence	Quality assurance

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at uib.no/en/citizen

Scope

Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Universe: Norwegian citizens 18 years or older.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in the following waves:

Round	Sample size	Recruited
1	25 000	4 870
3	25 000	5 623
8	22 000	4 245
11	14 000	2 069
14	14 000	2 036
16	34 000	5 163
18	14 000	2 048
22	23 000	3 221
25	18 000	2 405

All samples are drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register.

The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.

Mode of Data Collection

The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from previous waves: https://nsd.no/nsddata/serier/norsk_medborgerpanel_eng.html

In wave 27, email invitations were sent out on 2nd of June 2023 for softlaunch, and on the 5th of June for the main launch.

An email with reminder was sent out three times; 8th of June, 14th of June, and 19th of June to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message. Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by email.

Wave 27 ended on the 23rd of June 2023.

Weighting

To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different strata are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).

Four different weights have been calculated:

Weight based on age, gender and geography.
Weight combining gender, age, and geography with three-part education.
Weight combining gender, age, geography, and two-part education.
Weight combining gender, age and two-part education.

When applied, all weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weights are calculated using the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized) sub-groups, which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group compared to the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, variable columns are included in the dataset that indicates the proportion size of strata in the population.

Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.

Change Log

Version	Release date / Date changed	Variable	Changes and notes
v-101	2023-08-31	NA	Revised release of round 27
NA	2023-08-31	r27_pcoil	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r20bk26	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r22bk26_kodet	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r25_bgedu	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27P4_2	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgedu	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_1	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_2	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_3	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_4	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_5	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_6	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_7	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_8	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_9	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_10	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_11	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_12	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_13	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_14	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_15	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_16	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_17	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_18	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_19	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_20	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgind_21	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvnei	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvtcm_5	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_mernsx1	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_mernsx2	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_mernsx3	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_mernsx4	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvsexx1	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvsexx2	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvsexx3	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvfos_1	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvfos_2	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvfos_3	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvfos_4	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvfos_5	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_popvsx_1	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_popvsx_2	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_popvsx_3	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_pcoil	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_pocpi_1	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_pocpi_2	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_pocpi_3	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_pocpi_4	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_pocpi_5	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_pocpi_6	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_pocpi_7	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r25_pcvot21	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvneioxa	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvtrp_1	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_dvtrp_2	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_ceassx2_a	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_ceassx2_b	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_ceassx2_c	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_ceassx2_d	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_ceassx2_e	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_mlmrm	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_mlmrr	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_faabe	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_cemep	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_pcpaf	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_pcpak	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_pcpar	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgscp	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_bgscp_6_other	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-08-30	r27_pcecr	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-06-30	r27_Weight4	New variable: Added r27_Weight4
v-100	2023-06-30	NA	Initial release of round 27
NA	2023-06-29	r27_Weight5	New variable: Added r27_Weight5
NA	2023-06-27	r25_pcsaf	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-06-27	r26_pcsaf	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-06-27	r26_pcoil	Variable documentation updated
NA	2023-05-15	r26_pcoil	Corrected documentation
NA	2023-05-15	r26_pcecr	Corrected documentation
NA	2023-05-15	r26_pcsaf	Corrected documentation
NA	2023-03-28	r25_bgupc	New variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years of age, based on registered municipality in r25_bgupm
NA	2023-03-28	r25_bgupc	Variable documentation inserted
NA	2022-05-04	r22k3_kodet	New variable: New version of r22k3 that also includes coded other-statements
NA	2022-05-04	r22bk26_kodet	New variable: New version of r22bk26 that also includes coded other-statements
NA	2022-05-04	r23bk33_kodet	New variable: New version of r23bk33 that also includes coded other-statements
NA	2022-05-04	r23bk21_kodet	New variable: New version of r23bk21 that also includes coded other-statements
NA	2022-05-04	r22k3_kodet	Variable documentation inserted
NA	2022-05-04	r22bk26_kodet	Variable documentation inserted
NA	2022-02-14	r22oppvekstfylke	New variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years of age, based on registered municipality in r22oppvekstkom
NA	2022-02-14	r22oppvekstfylke	Variable documentation inserted
NA	2021-05-12	r20tdr8_a_kodet	New variable: New version of r20tdr8_a that also includes coded other-statements
NA	2021-05-12	r20tdr8_b_kodet	New variable: New version of r20tdr8_b that also includes coded other-statements
NA	2021-05-12	r16k43_1_kodet	New variable: New version of r16k43_1 that also includes coded other-statements
NA	2021-05-12	r16k43_2_kodet	New variable: New version of r16k43_2 that also includes coded other-statements
NA	2021-05-12	r16k43_1_kodet	Variable documentation inserted
NA	2021-05-12	r16k43_2_kodet	Variable documentation inserted
NA	2021-02-11	r17oppvekstfylke	New variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years of age, based on registered municipality in r17oppvekstkom
NA	2021-02-11	r18oppvekstfylke	New variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years of age, based on registered municipality in r18oppvekstkom
NA	2021-02-11	r17oppvekstfylke	Variable documentation inserted
NA	2021-02-11	r18oppvekstfylke	Variable documentation inserted
NA	2019-03-27	r11bk40_recode	Added variable based on r11k40.
NA	2019-03-27	r14bk40_recode	Added variable based on r14k40.

Dataset contents

File name	Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 27 - v-101-O.sav
Distribution type	Public
# Cases	9997
# Variables	591

Variable Documentation

responseid

Variable label:	responseid
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r27_rekruttert

Variable label:	The wave the respondent was recruited
Technical description:	The wave the respondent was recruited
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-25]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Wave 1	1224	12.2%	0.12243673
3	Wave 3	1276	12.8%	0.12763829
8	Wave 8	1198	12.0%	0.11983595
11	Wave 11	631	6.3%	0.06311894
14	Wave 14	658	6.6%	0.06581975
16	Wave 16	1818	18.2%	0.18185456
18	Wave 18	683	6.8%	0.06832050
22	Wave 22	1290	12.9%	0.12903871
25	Wave 25	1219	12.2%	0.12193658

r27_interview_start

Variable label:	[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical description:	[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r27_interview_end

Variable label:	[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical description:	[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9113] [Invalid:884] [Range:-]

r27_browsertype

Variable label:	Browertype used by respondent
Technical description:	Browertype used by respondent
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r27_browserversion

Variable label:	Browser version used by respondent
Technical description:	Browser version used by respondent
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r27_mobil

Variable label:	Determines if the respondents uses mobile
Technical description:	Determines if the respondents uses mobile
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	Other	4847	48.5%	0.4848455
1	Mobile	5150	51.5%	0.5151545

r27_opplosning

Variable label:	Screen resolution of the applied device
Technical description:	Screen resolution of the applied device
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r27_enhetstype

Variable label:	Determines respondents device type
Technical description:	Determines respondents device type
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	PC	4847	48.5%	0.48484545
2	Touch	5101	51.0%	0.51025308
3	Generic	49	0.5%	0.00490147

r27_advancedwifeaturesenabled

Variable label:	Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
Technical description:	Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r27_getrenderingmode

Variable label:	Detects the browsers rendering mode
Technical description:	Detects the browsers rendering mode
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r27_group

Variable label:	Subgroup for wave 27.
Technical description:	[Randomized for all respondents]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Group 1	1973	19.7%	0.1973592
2	Group 2	2040	20.4%	0.2040612
3	Group 3	1980	19.8%	0.1980594
4	Group 4	1997	20.0%	0.1997599
5	Group 5	2007	20.1%	0.2007602

r27_panelgroup

Variable label:	Panelgroup for wave 27.
Technical description:	[Conditional randomisation. If the respondent was in group 3 (KODEM-group 1) in wave 26, panel group 1 was selected. If the respondent was in group 4 (KODEM-group 2) in wave 26, panel group 2 was selected. Remaining respondents was randomised between panel group 3, 4, and 5.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Panelgroup 1 (KODEM-group 1 in wave 26)	1543	15.4%	0.1543463
2	Panelgroup 2 (KODEM-group 2 in wave 26)	1572	15.7%	0.1572472
3	Panelgroup 3	2286	22.9%	0.2286686
4	Panelgroup 4	2251	22.5%	0.2251676
5	Panelgroup 5	2345	23.5%	0.2345704

r27_pcsag

Variable label:	How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Literal question:	How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	158	1.6%	0.01580474
2	Satisfied	2080	20.8%	0.20806242
3	Somewhat satisfied	3361	33.6%	0.33620086
4	Dissatisfied	2923	29.2%	0.29238772
5	Not satisfied at all	1447	14.5%	0.14474342
97	Not answered	28	0.3%	0.00280084

r27_metnc_1

Variable label:	Confidence in the following Norwegian media: Finansavisen
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you have confidence in the following Norwegian media?
Literal question:	Finansavisen
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very large extent	55	2.8%	0.02777778
2	To a large extent	493	24.9%	0.24898990
3	To some extent	619	31.3%	0.31262626
4	To a small extent	120	6.1%	0.06060606
5	Not at all	56	2.8%	0.02828283
6	Not familiar with this medium	618	31.2%	0.31212121
97	Not answered	19	1.0%	0.00959596
98	Not asked	8017		NA

r27_metnc_2

Variable label:	Confidence in the following Norwegian media: VG
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you have confidence in the following Norwegian media?
Literal question:	VG
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very large extent	30	1.5%	0.01515152
2	To a large extent	365	18.4%	0.18434343
3	To some extent	974	49.2%	0.49191919
4	To a small extent	433	21.9%	0.21868687
5	Not at all	106	5.4%	0.05353535
6	Not familiar with this medium	53	2.7%	0.02676768
97	Not answered	19	1.0%	0.00959596
98	Not asked	8017		NA

r27_metnc_3

Variable label:	Confidence in the following Norwegian media: Resett
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you have confidence in the following Norwegian media?
Literal question:	Resett
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very large extent	5	0.3%	0.002525253
2	To a large extent	31	1.6%	0.015656566
3	To some extent	198	10.0%	0.100000000
4	To a small extent	244	12.3%	0.123232323
5	Not at all	496	25.1%	0.250505051
6	Not familiar with this medium	967	48.8%	0.488383838
97	Not answered	39	2.0%	0.019696970
98	Not asked	8017		NA

r27_metnc_4

Variable label:	Confidence in the following Norwegian media: Klassekampen
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you have confidence in the following Norwegian media?
Literal question:	Klassekampen
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very large extent	75	3.8%	0.03787879
2	To a large extent	412	20.8%	0.20808081
3	To some extent	573	28.9%	0.28939394
4	To a small extent	255	12.9%	0.12878788
5	Not at all	128	6.5%	0.06464646
6	Not familiar with this medium	506	25.6%	0.25555556
97	Not answered	31	1.6%	0.01565657
98	Not asked	8017		NA

r27_pcpar

Variable label:	Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
Literal question:	Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Answer list display order: Element 1-11 was randomized. The remaining was kept in place.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	313	3.1%	0.03130939
2	The Conservative Party	2857	28.6%	0.28578574
3	The Progress Party	663	6.6%	0.06631990
4	The Liberal Party	486	4.9%	0.04861458
5	The Socialist Left Party	1074	10.7%	0.10743223
6	The Centre Party	393	3.9%	0.03931179
7	The Green Party	513	5.1%	0.05131539
8	The Labour Party	1674	16.7%	0.16745024
9	The Red Party	653	6.5%	0.06531960
10	Would not vote	206	2.1%	0.02060618
11	Would cast a blank vote	367	3.7%	0.03671101
12	Not entitled to vote	189	1.9%	0.01890567
13	Other:	575	5.8%	0.05751726
97	Not answered	34	0.3%	0.00340102

r27_pcpar_13_other

Variable label:	Other: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
Pre-question text:	Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Literal question:	Other:
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Answer list display order: Randomized] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_pcpak

Variable label:	Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Literal question:	Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Answer list display order: Element 1-11 was randomized. The remaining was kept in place.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-17]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	306	3.1%	0.03060918
2	The Conservative Party	2681	26.8%	0.26818045
3	The Progress Party	564	5.6%	0.05641693
4	The Liberal Party	428	4.3%	0.04281284
5	The Socialist Left Party	867	8.7%	0.08672602
6	The Centre Party	527	5.3%	0.05271581
7	The Green Party	628	6.3%	0.06281885
8	The Labour Party	1904	19.0%	0.19045714
9	The Red Party	579	5.8%	0.05791738
10	People's Party FNB	25	0.3%	0.00250075
11	The Industry and Business Party	245	2.5%	0.02450735
12	A joint party list	26	0.3%	0.00260078
13	A local list	264	2.6%	0.02640792
14	Would not vote	238	2.4%	0.02380714
15	Would cast a blank vote	273	2.7%	0.02730819
16	Not entitled to vote	28	0.3%	0.00280084
17	Other:	376	3.8%	0.03761128
97	Not answered	38	0.4%	0.00380114

r27_pcpak_17_other

Variable label:	Other: Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Pre-question text:	Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Literal question:	Other
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Answer list display order: Randomized] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_pcpaf

Variable label:	Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Literal question:	Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Answer list display order: Element 1-11 was randomized. The remaining was kept in place.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-17]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	286	2.9%	0.028608583
2	The Conservative Party	2584	25.8%	0.258477543
3	The Progress Party	534	5.3%	0.053416025
4	The Liberal Party	409	4.1%	0.040912274
5	The Socialist Left Party	925	9.3%	0.092527758
6	The Centre Party	472	4.7%	0.047214164
7	The Green Party	595	6.0%	0.059517855
8	The Labour Party	1746	17.5%	0.174652396
9	The Red Party	564	5.6%	0.056416925
10	People's Party FNB	22	0.2%	0.002200660
11	The Industry and Business Party	276	2.8%	0.027608282
12	A joint party list	20	0.2%	0.002000600
13	A local list	123	1.2%	0.012303691
14	Would not vote	520	5.2%	0.052015605
15	Would cast a blank vote	406	4.1%	0.040612184
16	Not entitled to vote	73	0.7%	0.007302191
17	Other:	368	3.7%	0.036811043
97	Not answered	74	0.7%	0.007402221

r27_pcpaf_17_other

Variable label:	Other: Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Pre-question text:	Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Literal question:	Other
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Answer list display order: Randomized] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_pcmipo_1

Variable label:	Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? (1)
Pre-question text:	What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Literal question:	1:
Post-question:	Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown on the same page as [r27_pcmipo_2] and [r27_pcmipo_3].] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_pcmipo_2

Variable label:	Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? (2)
Pre-question text:	What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Literal question:	2:
Post-question:	Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown on the same page as [r27_pcmipo_1] and [r27_pcmipo_3].] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_pcmipo_3

Variable label:	Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? (3)
Pre-question text:	What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Literal question:	3:
Post-question:	Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown on the same page as [r27_pcmipo_1] and [r27_pcmipo_2].] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_ceanxx_ran

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in [r27_ceanxx]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2040] [Invalid:7957] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	are concerned about climate change	677	33.2%	0.3318627
2	suffer from climate anxiety	679	33.3%	0.3328431
3	are interested in climate issues	684	33.5%	0.3352941
Sysmiss		7957		NA

r27_ceanxx

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Politicans should take into account that many young people [r27_ceanxx_ran] when formulating new climate policy.
Literal question:	Sometimes we read in the media that many young people [r27_ceanxx_ran]. To what extent do you agree or disagree that politicians should take this into account when formulating new climate policy?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	445	21.8%	0.218137255
2	Agree	579	28.4%	0.283823529
3	Agree somewhat	460	22.5%	0.225490196
4	Neither agree nor disagree	244	12.0%	0.119607843
5	Disagree somewhat	106	5.2%	0.051960784
6	Disagree	109	5.3%	0.053431373
7	Strongly disagree	94	4.6%	0.046078431
97	Not answered	3	0.1%	0.001470588
98	Not asked	7957		NA

r27_ceanxxo

Variable label:	Open: What do you think of when you hear or read the term “climate anxiety”?
Literal question:	What do you think of when you hear or read the term “climate anxiety”?
Post-question:	Please write down the first think you think of. All types of responses are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you prefer.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_cetht

Variable label:	How serious is the threat of climate change overall?
Literal question:	How serious is the threat of climate change overall?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)] [Shown on the same page and in randomised order with [r27_cethp].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very serious	708	34.7%	0.347058824
2	Serious	733	35.9%	0.359313725
3	Somewhat serious	399	19.6%	0.195588235
4	Not very serious	126	6.2%	0.061764706
5	Not a threat	59	2.9%	0.028921569
97	Not answered	15	0.7%	0.007352941
98	Not asked	7957		NA

r27_cethp

Variable label:	How serious is the threat of climate change for you personally?
Literal question:	How serious is the threat of climate change for you personally?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)] [Shown on the same page and in randomised order with [r27_cetht].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very serious	152	7.5%	0.074509804
2	Serious	489	24.0%	0.239705882
3	Somewhat serious	713	35.0%	0.349509804
4	Not very serious	492	24.1%	0.241176471
5	Not a threat	182	8.9%	0.089215686
97	Not answered	12	0.6%	0.005882353
98	Not asked	7957		NA

r27_cecns

Variable label:	What do you think: what share of climate researchers believe that climate change is largely the result of human impact?
Literal question:	What do you think: what share of climate researchers believe that climate change is largely the result of human impact?
Post-question:	You can respond by dragging the cursor along the line or by typing a number between 0 and 100 in the next box.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)] [Shown as slider. Respondents who were exposed for the question before 12:30 08/06/2023 were only able to input 0-99. Respondents who were exposed to the question after this were able to input 0-100.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1999] [Invalid:7998] [Range:0-100]

r27_dvcir

Variable label:	Curbing climate change globally should take priority over the rights of indigenous people.
Literal question:	The next statement concerns a trade-off between two considerations that often go hand in hand. However, situations may arise where one consideration needs to be weighted up against the other. We would like to know what you think should be prioritised in such cases. To what extent do you agree with the following statement? Curbing climate change globally should take priority over the rights of indigenous people.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	150	7.6%	0.075757576
2	Agree	378	19.1%	0.190909091
3	Agree somewhat	518	26.2%	0.261616162
4	Neither agree nor disagree	342	17.3%	0.172727273
5	Disagree somewhat	240	12.1%	0.121212121
6	Disagree	226	11.4%	0.114141414
7	Strongly disagree	121	6.1%	0.061111111
97	Not answered	5	0.3%	0.002525253
98	Not asked	8017		NA

r27_ceengo

Variable label:	Open: What do you think of when you hear or read the word “energy”?
Literal question:	What do you think of when you hear or read the word “energy”?
Post-question:	Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses are welcome.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_cemep

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The cost of meat products should be greatly increased in order to combat climate change.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The cost of meat products should be greatly increased in order to combat climate change.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
5	Completely agree	332	7.3%	0.073176108
4	Slightly agree	948	20.9%	0.208948644
3	Neither agree nor disagree	797	17.6%	0.175666740
2	Slightly disagree	955	21.0%	0.210491514
1	Completely disagree	1488	32.8%	0.327970024
97	Not answered	17	0.4%	0.003746969
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_faabe

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The right to self-determined abortion in Norway should be extended from week 12 to week 22.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The right to self-determined abortion in Norway should be extended from week 12 to week 22.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
5	Completely agree	727	16.0%	0.16023804
4	Slightly agree	782	17.2%	0.17236059
3	Neither agree nor disagree	1050	23.1%	0.23143046
2	Slightly disagree	754	16.6%	0.16618911
1	Completely disagree	1166	25.7%	0.25699802
97	Not answered	58	1.3%	0.01278378
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_cemep1

Variable label:	If you had to choose, agree/disagree: The cost of meat products should be greatly increased to combat climate change.
Literal question:	[You replied that you neither agree nor disagree with/You didn’t answer] the statement: “The cost of meat products should be greatly increased to combat climate change.” If you had to make a choice, would you be slightly more inclined to agree or disagree?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_cemep is not answered \| r27_cemep = 3) & (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Slightly more inclined to agree	464	57.7%	0.57711443
2	Slightly more inclined to disagree	326	40.5%	0.40547264
97	Not answered	14	1.7%	0.01741294
98	Not asked	9193		NA

r27_faabe1

Variable label:	If you had to choose, agree/disagree: The right to self-determined abortion in Norway should be extended from week 12 to week 22.
Literal question:	[You replied that you neither agree nor disagree with/You didn’t answer] the statement: “The right to self-determined abortion in Norway should be extended from week 12 to week 22.” If you had to make a choice, would you be slightly more inclined to agree or disagree?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_faabe is not answered \| r27_faabe = 3) & (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Slightly more inclined to agree	613	56.2%	0.56186984
2	Slightly more inclined to disagree	443	40.6%	0.40604950
97	Not answered	35	3.2%	0.03208066
98	Not asked	8906		NA

r27_hecoh

Variable label:	Confidence/lack of confidence: the health services
Literal question:	How much confidence do you have in the health services?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high confidence	172	8.7%	0.087176888
2	High confidence	1149	58.2%	0.582361885
3	Some confidence	421	21.3%	0.213380639
4	Neither confidence nor lack of it	64	3.2%	0.032437912
5	Some lack of confidence	104	5.3%	0.052711607
6	A high lack of confidence	46	2.3%	0.023314749
7	A severe lack of confidence	14	0.7%	0.007095793
97	Not answered	3	0.2%	0.001520527
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_hecod

Variable label:	Confidence/lack of confidence: your own GP
Literal question:	How much confidence do you have in your own GP?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high confidence	436	22.1%	0.220983274
2	High confidence	980	49.7%	0.496705525
3	Some confidence	297	15.1%	0.150532184
4	Neither confidence nor lack of it	107	5.4%	0.054232134
5	Some lack of confidence	55	2.8%	0.027876330
6	A high lack of confidence	23	1.2%	0.011657375
7	A severe lack of confidence	11	0.6%	0.005575266
8	Don't have a GP	58	2.9%	0.029396858
97	Not answered	6	0.3%	0.003041054
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heanw

Variable label:	How concerned are you about antibiotics losing their effect?
Literal question:	How concerned are you about antibiotics losing their effect?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very worried	341	17.3%	0.172833249
2	Worried	695	35.2%	0.352255449
3	Somewhat worried	638	32.3%	0.323365433
4	Not very worried	246	12.5%	0.124683224
5	Not at all worried	46	2.3%	0.023314749
97	Not answered	7	0.4%	0.003547897
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heanw_seen

Variable label:	Sets whether the respondent have been exposed to [r27_heanw] or not.
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1970] [Invalid:8027] [Range:1-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Seen [r27_heanw]	1970	100.0%	1
Sysmiss		8027		NA

r27_heanw_back

Variable label:	Sets whether the respondent has navigated back to [r27_heanw].
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:31] [Invalid:9966] [Range:1-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The respondent has navigated back to [27_heanw]	31	100.0%	1
Sysmiss		9966		NA

r27_heanw_originalvalue

Variable label:	The respondents initial value registered in [r27_heanw].
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1966] [Invalid:8031] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very worried	337	17.1%	0.17141404
2	Worried	695	35.4%	0.35350966
3	Somewhat worried	635	32.3%	0.32299084
4	Not very worried	252	12.8%	0.12817904
5	Not at all worried	47	2.4%	0.02390641
Sysmiss		8031		NA

r27_heani

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: I feel adequately informed about the problems associated with antibiotic resistance.
Literal question:	Bacteria are currently becoming increasingly more resitant, something which means that antibiotics are becoming less effective. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: I feel adequately informed about the problems associated with antibiotic resistance.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	309	15.7%	0.156614293
2	Agree	757	38.4%	0.383679676
3	Agree somewhat	439	22.3%	0.222503801
4	Neither agree nor disagree	156	7.9%	0.079067410
5	Disagree somewhat	181	9.2%	0.091738469
6	Disagree	102	5.2%	0.051697922
7	Strongly disagree	21	1.1%	0.010643690
97	Not answered	8	0.4%	0.004054739
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_hetan_1

Variable label:	How serious a threat do you think it will be if antibiotics lose their effect:
Pre-question text:	How serious a threat do you think it will be if antibiotics lose their effect …
Literal question:	… for you?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very serious	532	27.0%	0.269640142
2	Serious	666	33.8%	0.337557020
3	Somewhat serious	457	23.2%	0.231626964
4	Not very serious	255	12.9%	0.129244805
5	Not a threat	50	2.5%	0.025342119
97	Not answered	13	0.7%	0.006588951
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_hetan_2

Variable label:	How serious a threat do you think it will be if antibiotics lose their effect:
Pre-question text:	How serious a threat do you think it will be if antibiotics lose their effect …
Literal question:	… for Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very serious	844	42.8%	0.427774962
2	Serious	768	38.9%	0.389254942
3	Somewhat serious	239	12.1%	0.121135327
4	Not very serious	37	1.9%	0.018753168
5	Not a threat	14	0.7%	0.007095793
97	Not answered	71	3.6%	0.035985808
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_hetan_3

Variable label:	How serious a threat do you think it will be if antibiotics lose their effect:
Pre-question text:	How serious a threat do you think it will be if antibiotics lose their effect …
Literal question:	… for the world?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very serious	1441	73.0%	0.730359858
2	Serious	392	19.9%	0.198682210
3	Somewhat serious	63	3.2%	0.031931069
4	Not very serious	12	0.6%	0.006082108
5	Not a threat	7	0.4%	0.003547897
97	Not answered	58	2.9%	0.029396858
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heaus

Variable label:	Have you taken antibiotics the last year?
Literal question:	Have you taken antibiotics the last year?
Post-question:	For example, as a pill, ointment, drops or intravenously
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	406	20.6%	0.205778003
2	No	1528	77.4%	0.774455144
3	Can’t remember	27	1.4%	0.013684744
4	Do not know	3	0.2%	0.001520527
97	Not answered	9	0.5%	0.004561581
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heads_1

Variable label:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?: No
Pre-question text:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?
Literal question:	No
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	1032	52.3%	0.523061328
0	Not selected	938	47.5%	0.475418145
97	Not answered	3	0.2%	0.001520527
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heads_2

Variable label:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?: Yes, from health professionals
Pre-question text:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?
Literal question:	Yes, from health professionals
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	272	13.8%	0.137861125
0	Not selected	1698	86.1%	0.860618348
97	Not answered	3	0.2%	0.001520527
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heads_3

Variable label:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?: Yes, from official websites (such as antibiotika.no, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, etc.)
Pre-question text:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?
Literal question:	Yes, from official websites (such as antibiotika.no, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, etc.)
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	400	20.3%	0.202736949
0	Not selected	1570	79.6%	0.795742524
97	Not answered	3	0.2%	0.001520527
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heads_4

Variable label:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?: Yes, by searching online
Pre-question text:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?
Literal question:	Yes, by searching online
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	463	23.5%	0.234668018
0	Not selected	1507	76.4%	0.763811455
97	Not answered	3	0.2%	0.001520527
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heads_5

Variable label:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?: Yes, from the news media
Pre-question text:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?
Literal question:	Yes, from the news media
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	149	7.6%	0.075519513
0	Not selected	1821	92.3%	0.922959959
97	Not answered	3	0.2%	0.001520527
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heads_6

Variable label:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?: Yes, from social media
Pre-question text:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?
Literal question:	Yes, from social media
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	42	2.1%	0.021287380
0	Not selected	1928	97.7%	0.977192093
97	Not answered	3	0.2%	0.001520527
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heads_7

Variable label:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?: Yes, from elsewhere
Pre-question text:	Have you ever searched for information about the use of antibiotics?
Literal question:	Yes, from elsewhere
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	62	3.1%	0.031424227
0	Not selected	1908	96.7%	0.967055246
97	Not answered	3	0.2%	0.001520527
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heanr

Variable label:	Willing/unwilling: Abstain from antibiotics, even if it means being off sick for a few extra days
Literal question:	For many bacterial infections, such as a sore throat, you recover faster if you take antibiotics, but you usually also recover even without taking antibiotics, it just takes a little longer. How willing or unwilling are you to abstain from taking antibiotics, even if it means being off sick for a few extra days?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing to abstain from taking antibiotics	736	37.3%	0.373035986
2	Fairly willing to abstain from taking antibiotics	848	43.0%	0.429802331
3	Neither willing nor unwilling to abstain from taking antibiotics	245	12.4%	0.124176381
4	Fairly unwilling to abstain from taking antibiotics	115	5.8%	0.058286873
5	Very unwilling to abstain from taking antibiotics	20	1.0%	0.010136847
97	Not answered	9	0.5%	0.004561581
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heano

Variable label:	Willing/unwilling in other people: Abstain from antibiotics, even if it means being off sick for a few extra days
Literal question:	How willing or unwilling do you think other people would be to abstain from taking antibiotics, even if it means being off sick for a few extra days?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing to abstain from taking antibiotics	35	1.8%	0.01773948
2	Fairly willing to abstain from taking antibiotics	573	29.0%	0.29042068
3	Neither willing nor unwilling to abstain from taking antibiotics	609	30.9%	0.30866700
4	Fairly unwilling to abstain from taking antibiotics	683	34.6%	0.34617334
5	Very unwilling to abstain from taking antibiotics	43	2.2%	0.02179422
97	Not answered	30	1.5%	0.01520527
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heand_1

Variable label:	How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?: I would have accepted it without any trouble.
Pre-question text:	Imagine that you go to the doctor with something that you think is a bacterial infection and you are sure that you need antibiotics. How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?
Literal question:	I would have accepted it without any trouble.
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	1442	73.1%	0.730866700
0	Not selected	526	26.7%	0.266599088
97	Not answered	5	0.3%	0.002534212
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heand_2

Variable label:	How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?: I would have tried to persuade the doctor to prescribe antibiotics anyway.
Pre-question text:	Imagine that you go to the doctor with something that you think is a bacterial infection and you are sure that you need antibiotics. How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?
Literal question:	I would have tried to persuade the doctor to prescribe antibiotics anyway.
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	211	10.7%	0.106943740
0	Not selected	1757	89.1%	0.890522048
97	Not answered	5	0.3%	0.002534212
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heand_3

Variable label:	How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?: I would have been angry, but I wouldn’t have said anything.
Pre-question text:	Imagine that you go to the doctor with something that you think is a bacterial infection and you are sure that you need antibiotics. How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?
Literal question:	I would have been angry, but I wouldn’t have said anything.
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	42	2.1%	0.021287380
0	Not selected	1926	97.6%	0.976178409
97	Not answered	5	0.3%	0.002534212
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heand_4

Variable label:	How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?: I would have contacted another doctor.
Pre-question text:	Imagine that you go to the doctor with something that you think is a bacterial infection and you are sure that you need antibiotics. How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?
Literal question:	I would have contacted another doctor.
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	40	2.0%	0.020273695
0	Not selected	1928	97.7%	0.977192093
97	Not answered	5	0.3%	0.002534212
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heand_5

Variable label:	How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?: I would have asked for advice from a doctor or health professional who I know.
Pre-question text:	Imagine that you go to the doctor with something that you think is a bacterial infection and you are sure that you need antibiotics. How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?
Literal question:	I would have asked for advice from a doctor or health professional who I know.
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	265	13.4%	0.134313229
0	Not selected	1703	86.3%	0.863152560
97	Not answered	5	0.3%	0.002534212
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heand_6

Variable label:	How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?: Other:
Pre-question text:	Imagine that you go to the doctor with something that you think is a bacterial infection and you are sure that you need antibiotics. How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?
Literal question:	Other:
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	112	5.7%	0.056766346
0	Not selected	1856	94.1%	0.940699442
97	Not answered	5	0.3%	0.002534212
98	Not asked	8024		NA

r27_heand_6_other

Variable label:	Open: How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?: Other
Pre-question text:	Imagine that you go to the doctor with something that you think is a bacterial infection and you are sure that you need antibiotics. How would you react if your doctor did not prescribe antibiotics?
Literal question:	Other:
Post-question:	You can select several answers
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1)] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_pcecr

Variable label:	Economic situation in [r27P2] compared to the rest of the country
Literal question:	If you compare the economic situation [r27P2] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation [r27P2] as being better, the same or worse?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Better	517	25.3%	0.25343137
2	The same	1172	57.5%	0.57450980
3	Worse	321	15.7%	0.15735294
97	Not answered	30	1.5%	0.01470588
98	Not asked	7957		NA

r27_mlmrm

Variable label:	Do you live in a merged municipality?
Pre-question text:	Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January 2020. Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this has recently been the subject of debate.
Literal question:	Do you live in a merged municipality?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_mlmrm_b], [r27_mlmrr], and [r27_mlmrr_b].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	610	29.9%	0.299019608
2	No	1412	69.2%	0.692156863
97	Not answered	18	0.9%	0.008823529
98	Not asked	7957		NA

r27_mlmrm_b

Variable label:	Did you live in this municipality before it was merged?
Literal question:	Did you live in this municipality before it was merged?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_mlmrm = 1) & (r27_group = 2)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_mlmrm], [r27_mlmrr], and [r27_mlmrr_b].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	551	90.3%	0.903278689
2	No, I moved to the municipality after the merger	53	8.7%	0.086885246
97	Not answered	6	1.0%	0.009836066
98	Not asked	9387		NA

r27_mlmrr

Variable label:	Do you live in a merged county?
Pre-question text:	Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January 2020. Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this has recently been the subject of debate.
Literal question:	Do you live in a merged county?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_mlmrm], [r27_mlmrm_b], and [r27_mlmrr_b].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	1340	65.7%	0.65686275
2	No	678	33.2%	0.33235294
97	Not answered	22	1.1%	0.01078431
98	Not asked	7957		NA

r27_mlmrr_b

Variable label:	Did you live in this county before it was merged?
Literal question:	Did you live in this county before it was merged?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_mlmrr = 1) & (r27_group = 2)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_mlmrm], [r27_mlmrm_b], and [r27_mlmrr].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	1257	93.8%	0.938059701
2	No, I moved to the county after the merger	70	5.2%	0.052238806
97	Not answered	13	1.0%	0.009701493
98	Not asked	8657		NA

r27_mlat_1

Variable label:	How strong is your connection to: The municipality you lived in before it was merged
Pre-question text:	How strong is your connection to:
Literal question:	The municipality you lived in before it was merged
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_mlmrm = 1 & r27_mlmrm_b = 1) & (r27_group = 2)
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strong connection	214	38.8%	0.38838475
2	Connection	192	34.8%	0.34845735
3	Some connection	79	14.3%	0.14337568
4	Small connection	46	8.3%	0.08348457
5	No connection	14	2.5%	0.02540835
97	Not answered	6	1.1%	0.01088929
98	Not asked	9446		NA

r27_mlat_2

Variable label:	How strong is your connection to: The municipality you live in after it was merged
Pre-question text:	How strong is your connection to:
Literal question:	The municipality you live in after it was merged
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_mlmrm = 1 & r27_mlmrm_b = 1) & (r27_group = 2)
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strong connection	163	29.6%	0.29582577
2	Connection	189	34.3%	0.34301270
3	Some connection	110	20.0%	0.19963702
4	Small connection	65	11.8%	0.11796733
5	No connection	18	3.3%	0.03266788
97	Not answered	6	1.1%	0.01088929
98	Not asked	9446		NA

r27_mlat_3

Variable label:	How strong is your connection to: The municipality you live in
Pre-question text:	How strong is your connection to:
Literal question:	The municipality you live in
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_mlmrm = 2) \| (r27_mlmrm = 1) & (r27_mlmrm_b = 2) & (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strong connection	516	35.0%	0.3495934959
2	Connection	536	36.3%	0.3631436314
3	Some connection	263	17.8%	0.1781842818
4	Small connection	134	9.1%	0.0907859079
5	No connection	26	1.8%	0.0176151762
97	Not answered	1	0.1%	0.0006775068
98	Not asked	8521		NA

r27_mlat_4

Variable label:	How strong is your connection to: The county you lived in before it was merged
Pre-question text:	How strong is your connection to:
Literal question:	The county you lived in before it was merged
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_mlmrr = 1 & r27_mlmrr_b = 1) & (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strong connection	353	28.1%	0.28082737
2	Connection	459	36.5%	0.36515513
3	Some connection	219	17.4%	0.17422434
4	Small connection	168	13.4%	0.13365155
5	No connection	42	3.3%	0.03341289
97	Not answered	16	1.3%	0.01272872
98	Not asked	8740		NA

r27_mlat_5

Variable label:	How strong is your connection to: The county you live in after it was merged
Pre-question text:	How strong is your connection to:
Literal question:	The county you live in after it was merged
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_mlmrr = 1 & r27_mlmrr_b = 1) & (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strong connection	205	16.3%	0.16308671
2	Connection	358	28.5%	0.28480509
3	Some connection	298	23.7%	0.23707239
4	Small connection	286	22.8%	0.22752586
5	No connection	94	7.5%	0.07478123
97	Not answered	16	1.3%	0.01272872
98	Not asked	8740		NA

r27_mlat_6

Variable label:	How strong is your connection to: The county you live in
Pre-question text:	How strong is your connection to:
Literal question:	The county you live in
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_mlmrr = 2) \| (r27_mlmrr = 1) & (r27_mlmrr_b = 2) & (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strong connection	220	28.6%	0.285714286
2	Connection	249	32.3%	0.323376623
3	Some connection	138	17.9%	0.179220779
4	Small connection	117	15.2%	0.151948052
5	No connection	41	5.3%	0.053246753
97	Not answered	5	0.6%	0.006493506
98	Not asked	9227		NA

r27_mlat_7

Variable label:	Norway
Pre-question text:	How strong is your connection to:
Literal question:	Norway
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strong connection	1447	70.9%	0.709313725
2	Connection	433	21.2%	0.212254902
3	Some connection	82	4.0%	0.040196078
4	Small connection	33	1.6%	0.016176471
5	No connection	8	0.4%	0.003921569
97	Not answered	37	1.8%	0.018137255
98	Not asked	7957		NA

r27_cpres

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree with the following statement: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	336	16.5%	0.164705882
2	Agree	637	31.2%	0.312254902
3	Agree somewhat	636	31.2%	0.311764706
4	Neither agree nor disagree	192	9.4%	0.094117647
5	Disagree somewhat	132	6.5%	0.064705882
6	Disagree	65	3.2%	0.031862745
7	Strongly disagree	19	0.9%	0.009313725
97	Not answered	23	1.1%	0.011274510
98	Not asked	7957		NA

r27_pcrur

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?: Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	357	17.5%	0.17500000
2	Agree	492	24.1%	0.24117647
3	Agree somewhat	466	22.8%	0.22843137
4	Neither agree nor disagree	291	14.3%	0.14264706
5	Disagree somewhat	200	9.8%	0.09803922
6	Disagree	158	7.7%	0.07745098
7	Strongly disagree	51	2.5%	0.02500000
97	Not answered	25	1.2%	0.01225490
98	Not asked	7957		NA

r27_popvsx_ran

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in [27_popvsx].
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2026] [Invalid:7971] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Imagine that two politicians are competing for a safe seat in a general election. Just before the decision, it emerges that one of the candidates has sent an unsolicited photo containing sexual content to the other candidate.	515	25.4%	0.2541955
2	Imagine that two politicians are competing for a safe seat in a general election. Just before the decision, it emerges that one of the candidates has sent an unsolicited photo containing sexual content to the other candidate. The recipient finds the incident to be unpleasant and degrading.	501	24.7%	0.2472853
3	Imagine that a male and a female politician are competing for a safe seat in a general election. Just before the decision, it emerges that the male candidate has sent an unsolicited photo containing sexual content to the female candidate. The recipient finds the incident to be unpleasant and degrading.	541	26.7%	0.2670286
4	Imagine that a male and a female politician are competing for a safe seat in a general election. Just before the decision, it emerges that the female candidate has sent an unsolicited photo containing sexual content to the male candidate. The recipient finds the incident to be unpleasant and degrading.	469	23.1%	0.2314906
Sysmiss		7971		NA

r27_popvsx_1

Variable label:	[r27_popvsx_ran]. Agree/disagree: such behaviour between politicians is acceptable?
Pre-question text:	[r27_popvsx_ran]
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that such behaviour between politicans is acceptable?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	159	7.8%	0.07794118
2	Agree	48	2.4%	0.02352941
3	Agree somewhat	26	1.3%	0.01274510
4	Neither agree nor disagree	81	4.0%	0.03970588
5	Disagree somewhat	46	2.3%	0.02254902
6	Disagree	351	17.2%	0.17205882
7	Strongly disagree	1299	63.7%	0.63676471
97	Not answered	30	1.5%	0.01470588
98	Not asked	7957		NA

r27_popvsx_2

Variable label:	[r27_popvsx_ran]. Agree/disagree: parties should sanction such behaviour?
Pre-question text:	[r27_popvsx_ran]
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that parties should sanction such behaviour?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	1121	55.0%	0.54950980
2	Agree	519	25.4%	0.25441176
3	Agree somewhat	144	7.1%	0.07058824
4	Neither agree nor disagree	117	5.7%	0.05735294
5	Disagree somewhat	35	1.7%	0.01715686
6	Disagree	32	1.6%	0.01568627
7	Strongly disagree	43	2.1%	0.02107843
97	Not answered	29	1.4%	0.01421569
98	Not asked	7957		NA

r27_popvsx_3

Variable label:	[r27_popvsx_ran]. Agree/disagree: such behaviour between politicians is a challenge to democracy?
Pre-question text:	[r27_popvsx_ran]
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that such behaviour between politicians is a challenge to democracy?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	632	31.0%	0.30980392
2	Agree	547	26.8%	0.26813725
3	Agree somewhat	294	14.4%	0.14411765
4	Neither agree nor disagree	297	14.6%	0.14558824
5	Disagree somewhat	81	4.0%	0.03970588
6	Disagree	104	5.1%	0.05098039
7	Strongly disagree	57	2.8%	0.02794118
97	Not answered	28	1.4%	0.01372549
98	Not asked	7957		NA

r27_pcsex

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree with the following assertion: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	20	1.0%	0.010101010
2	Agree	55	2.8%	0.027777778
3	Agree somewhat	202	10.2%	0.102020202
4	Neither agree nor disagree	144	7.3%	0.072727273
5	Disagree somewhat	244	12.3%	0.123232323
6	Disagree	611	30.9%	0.308585859
7	Strongly disagree	696	35.2%	0.351515152
97	Not answered	8	0.4%	0.004040404
98	Not asked	8017		NA

r27_dvsexx_ran

Variable label:	Determines group in [r27_dvsexx1] - [r27_dvsexx3].
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1978] [Invalid:8019] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Group 1	477	24.1%	0.2411527
2	Group 2	506	25.6%	0.2558140
3	Group 3	495	25.0%	0.2502528
4	Group 4	500	25.3%	0.2527806
Sysmiss		8019		NA

r27_dvsexx_pipe

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects what text in [r27_dvsexx1 - r27_dvsexx3] the respondent will be exposed for.
Technical description:	[If [r27_dvsexx_ran] = 1 the first element is selected. If [r27_dvsexx_ran] = 2 the second element is selected. If [r27_dvsexx_ran] = 3 the third element is selected. If [r27_dvsexx_ran] = 4 the fourth element is selected.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1978] [Invalid:8019] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	do you think most women in Norway	477	24.1%	0.2411527
2	do you think most men in Norway	506	25.6%	0.2558140
3	do you think an ordinary Norwegian man	495	25.0%	0.2502528
4	do you think most people in Norway	500	25.3%	0.2527806
Sysmiss		8019		NA

r27_dvsexx_pipe2

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects what text in [r27_dvsexx1 - r27_dvsexx3] the respondent will be exposed for.
Technical description:	[If [r27_dvsexx_ran] = 1 the first element is selected. If [r27_dvsexx_ran] = 2 the second element is selected. If [r27_dvsexx_ran] = 3 the third element is selected. If [r27_dvsexx_ran] = 4 the fourth element is selected.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1978] [Invalid:8019] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Most women	477	24.1%	0.2411527
2	Most men	506	25.6%	0.2558140
3	An ordinary Norwegian man	495	25.0%	0.2502528
4	Most people in Norway	500	25.3%	0.2527806
Sysmiss		8019		NA

r27_dvsexx1

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: To what extent [r27_dvsexx_pipe] agree that it is womens own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
Literal question:	To what extent [r27_dvsexx_pipe] agree or disagree that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexualt attention? [r27_dvsexx_pipe2] …
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	30	1.5%	0.015151515
2	Agree	155	7.8%	0.078282828
3	Agree somewhat	447	22.6%	0.225757576
4	Neither agree nor disagree	197	9.9%	0.099494949
5	Disagree somewhat	399	20.2%	0.201515152
6	Disagree	508	25.7%	0.256565657
7	Strongly disagree	235	11.9%	0.118686869
97	Not answered	9	0.5%	0.004545455
98	Not asked	8017		NA

r27_dvsexx2

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Five years ago, to what extent [r27_dvsexx_pipe] agreed that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
Literal question:	Five years ago, i.e. in 2018, to what extent [r27_dvsexx_pipe] agreed or disagreed that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention? [r27_dvsexx_pipe2] …
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agreed	49	2.5%	0.02474747
2	Agreed	234	11.8%	0.11818182
3	Somewhat agreed	483	24.4%	0.24393939
4	Neither agreed nor disagreed	223	11.3%	0.11262626
5	Somewhat disagreed	411	20.8%	0.20757576
6	Disagreed	415	21.0%	0.20959596
7	Strongly disagreed	143	7.2%	0.07222222
97	Not answered	22	1.1%	0.01111111
98	Not asked	8017		NA

r27_dvsexx3

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: In five years, to what extent [r27_dvsexx_pipe] will agree that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
Literal question:	In five year’s time, i.e. in 2028, to what extent [r27_dvsexx_pipe] will agree or disagree that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention? [r27_dvsexx_pipe2] will …
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	50	2.5%	0.02525253
2	Agree	137	6.9%	0.06919192
3	Somewhat agree	276	13.9%	0.13939394
4	Neither agree nor disagree	207	10.5%	0.10454545
5	Somewhat disagree	337	17.0%	0.17020202
6	Disagree	568	28.7%	0.28686869
7	Strongly disagree	363	18.3%	0.18333333
97	Not answered	42	2.1%	0.02121212
98	Not asked	8017		NA

r27_ceass_ran

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects whether the respondent is exposed to [r27_ceassx1] or [r27_ceassx2].
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1974] [Invalid:8023] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The respondent is exposed to [r27_ceassx1]	1031	52.2%	0.5222898
2	The respondent is exposed to [r27_ceassx2]	943	47.8%	0.4777102
Sysmiss		8023		NA

r27_ceassx1_1

Variable label:	Most people in Norway agree/disagree: Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
Pre-question text:	All in all, do you think that most people in Norway agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question:	Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_ceass_ran = 1) & (r27_group = 3)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	agree	587	56.9%	0.56935015
2	disagree	430	41.7%	0.41707081
97	Not answered	14	1.4%	0.01357905
98	Not asked	8966		NA

r27_ceassx1_2

Variable label:	Most people in Norway agree/disagree: The climate is changing, in large part due to human influence.
Pre-question text:	All in all, do you think that most people in Norway agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question:	The climate is changing, in large part due to human influence.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_ceass_ran = 1) & (r27_group = 3)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	agree	857	83.1%	0.831231814
2	disagree	166	16.1%	0.161008729
97	Not answered	8	0.8%	0.007759457
98	Not asked	8966		NA

r27_ceassx1_3

Variable label:	Most people in Norway agree/disagree: In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars which run on diesel or petrol.
Pre-question text:	All in all, do you think that most people in Norway agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question:	In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars which run on diesel or petrol.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_ceass_ran = 1) & (r27_group = 3)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	agree	827	80.2%	0.80213385
2	disagree	191	18.5%	0.18525703
97	Not answered	13	1.3%	0.01260912
98	Not asked	8966		NA

r27_ceassx1_4

Variable label:	Most people in Norway agree/disagree: In 10 to 15 years, the oil and gas industry should be smaller than today.
Pre-question text:	All in all, do you think that most people in Norway agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question:	In 10 to 15 years, the oil and gas industry should be smaller than today.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_ceass_ran = 1) & (r27_group = 3)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	agree	613	59.5%	0.594568380
2	disagree	412	40.0%	0.399612027
97	Not answered	6	0.6%	0.005819593
98	Not asked	8966		NA

r27_ceassx1_5

Variable label:	Most people in Norway agree/disagree: Curbing climate change globally should take priority over the rights of indigenous people.
Pre-question text:	All in all, do you think that most people in Norway agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question:	Curbing climate change globally should take priority over the rights of indigenous people.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_ceass_ran = 1) & (r27_group = 3)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	agree	670	65.0%	0.64985451
2	disagree	343	33.3%	0.33268671
97	Not answered	18	1.7%	0.01745878
98	Not asked	8966		NA

r27_ceassx2_a

Variable label:	What percentage of the population in Norway do you think agrees: Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
Pre-question text:	What is your assessment: What percentage of the population in Norway do you think agrees with the following statement?
Literal question:	Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_ceass_ran = 2) & (r27_group = 3)] [Shown on the same page and in randomised order with [r27_ceassx2_b] - [r27_ceassx2_e]. Shown as slider. Respondents who were exposed for the question before 12:30 08/06/2023 were only able to input 0-99. Respondents who were exposed to the question after this were able to input 0-100.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:925] [Invalid:9072] [Range:0-100]

r27_ceassx2_b

Variable label:	What percentage of the population in Norway do you think agrees: The climate is changing, in large part due to human influence.
Pre-question text:	What is your assessment: What percentage of the population in Norway do you think agrees with the following statement?
Literal question:	The climate is changing, in large part due to human influence.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_ceass_ran = 2) & (r27_group = 3)] [Shown on the same page and in randomised order with [r27_ceassx2_a] - [r27_ceassx2_e]. Shown as slider. Respondents who were exposed for the question before 12:30 08/06/2023 were only able to input 0-99. Respondents who were exposed to the question after this were able to input 0-100.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:928] [Invalid:9069] [Range:0-100]

r27_ceassx2_c

Variable label:	What percentage of the population in Norway do you think agrees: In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars which run on diesel or petrol.
Pre-question text:	What is your assessment: What percentage of the population in Norway do you think agrees with the following statement?
Literal question:	In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars which run on diesel or petrol.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_ceass_ran = 2) & (r27_group = 3)] [Shown on the same page and in randomised order with [r27_ceassx2_a] - [r27_ceassx2_e]. Shown as slider. Respondents who were exposed for the question before 12:30 08/06/2023 were only able to input 0-99. Respondents who were exposed to the question after this were able to input 0-100.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:928] [Invalid:9069] [Range:0-100]

r27_ceassx2_d

Variable label:	What percentage of the population in Norway do you think agrees: In 10 to 15 years, the oil and gas industry should be smaller than today.
Pre-question text:	What is your assessment: What percentage of the population in Norway do you think agrees with the following statement?
Literal question:	In 10 to 15 years, the oil and gas industry should be smaller than today.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_ceass_ran = 2) & (r27_group = 3)] [Shown on the same page and in randomised order with [r27_ceassx2_a] - [r27_ceassx2_e]. Shown as slider. Respondents who were exposed for the question before 12:30 08/06/2023 were only able to input 0-99. Respondents who were exposed to the question after this were able to input 0-100.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:921] [Invalid:9076] [Range:0-100]

r27_ceassx2_e

Variable label:	What percentage of the population in Norway do you think agrees: Curbing climate change globally should take priority over the rights of indigenous people.
Pre-question text:	What is your assessment: What percentage of the population in Norway do you think agrees with the following statement?
Literal question:	Curbing climate change globally should take priority over the rights of indigenous people.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_ceass_ran = 2) & (r27_group = 3)] [Shown on the same page and in randomised order with [r27_ceassx2_a] - [r27_ceassx2_d]. Shown as slider. Respondents who were exposed for the question before 12:30 08/06/2023 were only able to input 0-99. Respondents who were exposed to the question after this were able to input 0-100.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:923] [Invalid:9074] [Range:0-100]

r27_merns_ran_a

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent will be exposed to [r27_mernsx1] - [r27_mernsx4].
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1967] [Invalid:8030] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Group 1 (VG, Kiwi, control)	452	23.0%	0.2297916
2	Group 2 (VG, integration, control)	504	25.6%	0.2562278
3	Group 3 (VG, Kiwi, treatment)	504	25.6%	0.2562278
4	Group 4 (VG, integration, treatment)	507	25.8%	0.2577529
Sysmiss		8030		NA

r27_merns_ran_b

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r27_mernsx3-4].
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1967] [Invalid:8030] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Progress Party	959	48.8%	0.4875445
2	the Labour Party	1008	51.2%	0.5124555
Sysmiss		8030		NA

r27_mernsx1

Variable label:	To what extent do you perceive this news article to be reliable?
Literal question:	Look at this news article published by VG. [Picture: https://www.ideas2evidence.com/sites/default/files/private/Medborgerpanelet/Runde27/Nyheissak1.PNG] To what extent do you perceive this news article to be reliable?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_merns_ran_a = 1) & (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great extent	7	1.5%	0.015486726
2	To a great extent	47	10.4%	0.103982301
3	To some extent	169	37.4%	0.373893805
4	To a small extent	175	38.7%	0.387168142
5	Not at all	53	11.7%	0.117256637
97	Not answered	1	0.2%	0.002212389
98	Not asked	9545		NA

r27_mernsx2

Variable label:	To what extent do you perceive this news article to be reliable?
Literal question:	Look at this news article published by VG. [Picture: https://www.ideas2evidence.com/sites/default/files/private/Medborgerpanelet/Runde27/Nyheitssak2_VG_integreringsarbeid.PNG] To what extent do you perceive this news article to be reliable?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_merns_ran_a = 2) & (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great extent	13	2.6%	0.02579365
2	To a great extent	96	19.0%	0.19047619
3	To some extent	234	46.4%	0.46428571
4	To a small extent	128	25.4%	0.25396825
5	Not at all	27	5.4%	0.05357143
97	Not answered	6	1.2%	0.01190476
98	Not asked	9493		NA

r27_mernsx3

Variable label:	To what extent do you perceive this news article to be reliable?
Literal question:	Look at this news article published by VG. Imagine that this article is shared and commented on by a fictional politician from [r27_merns_ran_b]. [Picture: https://www.ideas2evidence.com/sites/default/files/private/Medborgerpanelet/Runde27/Nyheitssak3_Johan.PNG] After reading the politician’s post, to what extent do you perceive this article from VG to be reliable?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_merns_ran_a = 3) & (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great extent	4	0.8%	0.007936508
2	To a great extent	64	12.7%	0.126984127
3	To some extent	202	40.1%	0.400793651
4	To a small extent	183	36.3%	0.363095238
5	Not at all	40	7.9%	0.079365079
97	Not answered	11	2.2%	0.021825397
98	Not asked	9493		NA

r27_mernsx4

Variable label:	To what extent do you perceive this news article to be reliable?
Literal question:	Look at this news article published by VG. Imagine that this article is shared and commented on by a fictional politician from [r27_merns_ran_b]. [Picture: https://www.ideas2evidence.com/sites/default/files/private/Medborgerpanelet/Runde27/Integrering_Johan_final.png] After reading the politician’s post, to what extent do you perceive this article from VG to be reliable?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_merns_ran_a = 4) & (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great extent	7	1.4%	0.01380671
2	To a great extent	101	19.9%	0.19921105
3	To some extent	208	41.0%	0.41025641
4	To a small extent	144	28.4%	0.28402367
5	Not at all	33	6.5%	0.06508876
97	Not answered	14	2.8%	0.02761341
98	Not asked	9490		NA

r27_meipox

Variable label:	Do you have a good or bad impression of this politician?
Literal question:	Based on your spontaneous impression: did you have a good or a bad impression of this politician?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_merns_ran_a = 3, 4) & (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Good impression	15	1.5%	0.01483680
2	Slightly good impression	86	8.5%	0.08506429
3	Neither a good nor a bad impression	422	41.7%	0.41740851
4	Slightly bad impression	319	31.6%	0.31552918
5	Bad impression	137	13.6%	0.13550940
97	Not answered	32	3.2%	0.03165183
98	Not asked	8986		NA

r27_metvgx

Variable label:	To what extent do you have confidence in VG?
Literal question:	To what extent do you have confidence in VG?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very large extent	19	1.0%	0.00959596
2	To a large extent	344	17.4%	0.17373737
3	To some extent	1046	52.8%	0.52828283
4	To a small extent	436	22.0%	0.22020202
5	Not at all	75	3.8%	0.03787879
6	Not familiar with this medium	26	1.3%	0.01313131
97	Not answered	34	1.7%	0.01717172
98	Not asked	8017		NA

r27_dvetn_1

Variable label:	Identify as: Norwegian
Pre-question text:	People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
Literal question:	Norwegian
Post-question:	Several answers are possible
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_dvetn_2

Variable label:	Identify as: Sami
Pre-question text:	People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
Literal question:	Sami
Post-question:	Several answers are possible
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_dvetn_3

Variable label:	Identify as: Kven/Norwegian Finnish
Pre-question text:	People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
Literal question:	Kven/Norwegian Finnish
Post-question:	Several answers are possible
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_dvetn_4

Variable label:	Identify as: Forest Finn
Pre-question text:	People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
Literal question:	Forest Finn
Post-question:	Several answers are possible
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_dvetn_5

Variable label:	Identify as: Other
Pre-question text:	People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
Literal question:	Other
Post-question:	Several answers are possible
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_dvetn_5_other

Variable label:	Open: Identify as: Other
Pre-question text:	People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
Literal question:	Other
Post-question:	Several answers are possible
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_dvtck

Variable label:	Are you aware that the Storting (the Norwegian parliament) has appointed a special truth and reconciliation commission to investigate the Norwegianisation policy?
Literal question:	Are you aware that the Storting (the Norwegian parliament) has appointed a special truth and reconciliation commission to investigate the Norwegianisation policy that targeted Sami, Kven/Norwegian Finn, and Forest Finn people?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	1489	74.6%	0.745618428
2	No	505	25.3%	0.252879319
97	Not answered	3	0.2%	0.001502253
98	Not asked	8000		NA

r27_dvtim

Variable label:	How important do you think the work/the goal of the Stortings Truth and Reconciliation Commission is?
Literal question:	In 2018 the Storting set up a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to investigate historical injustices against the Sami people and three minority groups in Norway (Kvens, Norwegian Finns and Forest Finns). Prior to its establishment, discussions took place both within the Sami, Kven and Norwegian-Finnish communities and there was partisan disagreement about the importance of such a commission. One of the arguments in favour of setting up the commission was that we need more knowledge about Norwegianisation policy and its consequences. One argument against was to leave historical injustices in the past; you have to move on. One of the main tasks of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is to create reconciliation in Norway between (a) the state and minority groups (Sami, Kvens/Norwegian Finns and Forest Finns), and (b) between these different minority groups and the majority population How important do you think this work/aim is?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very important	497	24.9%	0.248873310
2	Important	870	43.6%	0.435653480
3	Not very important	418	20.9%	0.209313971
4	Not at all important	112	5.6%	0.056084126
5	Do not know	93	4.7%	0.046569855
97	Not answered	7	0.4%	0.003505258
98	Not asked	8000		NA

r27_dvtcm_1

Variable label:	Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: TV
Pre-question text:	Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question:	TV
Post-question:	Several answers are possible
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_dvtck = 1) & (r27_group = 4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	1144	76.8%	0.768300873
0	Not selected	343	23.0%	0.230355944
97	Not answered	2	0.1%	0.001343183
98	Not asked	8508		NA

r27_dvtcm_2

Variable label:	Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: Radio
Pre-question text:	Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question:	Radio
Post-question:	Several answers are possible
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_dvtck = 1) & (r27_group = 4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	558	37.5%	0.374748153
0	Not selected	929	62.4%	0.623908664
97	Not answered	2	0.1%	0.001343183
98	Not asked	8508		NA

r27_dvtcm_3

Variable label:	Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: National newspapers (paper newspapers and online newspapers)
Pre-question text:	Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question:	National newspapers (paper newspapers and online newspapers)
Post-question:	Several answers are possible
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_dvtck = 1) & (r27_group = 4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	835	56.1%	0.560779046
0	Not selected	652	43.8%	0.437877770
97	Not answered	2	0.1%	0.001343183
98	Not asked	8508		NA

r27_dvtcm_4

Variable label:	Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: Local newspapers (paper newspapers and online newspapers)
Pre-question text:	Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question:	Local newspapers (paper newspapers and online newspapers)
Post-question:	Several answers are possible
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_dvtck = 1) & (r27_group = 4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	184	12.4%	0.123572868
0	Not selected	1303	87.5%	0.875083949
97	Not answered	2	0.1%	0.001343183
98	Not asked	8508		NA

r27_dvtcm_5

Variable label:	Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: Social media (Facebook, Youtube, etc.)
Pre-question text:	Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question:	Social media (Facebook, Youtube, etc.)
Post-question:	Several answers are possible
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_dvtck = 1) & (r27_group = 4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	230	15.4%	0.154466085
0	Not selected	1257	84.4%	0.844190732
97	Not answered	2	0.1%	0.001343183
98	Not asked	8508		NA

r27_dvtcm_6

Variable label:	Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: Other sources
Pre-question text:	Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question:	Other sources
Post-question:	Several answers are possible
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_dvtck = 1) & (r27_group = 4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	88	5.9%	0.059100067
0	Not selected	1399	94.0%	0.939556749
97	Not answered	2	0.1%	0.001343183
98	Not asked	8508		NA

r27_dvfos_1

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The wind turbines must be taken down and the area should be returned how it was before the wind farm was built.
Pre-question text:	This winter we have seen demonstrations in Oslo in connection with the so-called Fosen case, 500 days after the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the wind turbines on the reindeer grazing grounds in Fosen in South Trøndelag were installed in contravention of the Sami people’s human rights. However, the Supreme Court has not said whether or not the installation should be closed down. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	The wind turbines must be taken down and the area should be returned how it was before the wind farm was built.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [Shown on the same page as [r27_dvfoso].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	290	14.5%	0.14521783
2	Agree	240	12.0%	0.12018027
3	Agree somewhat	205	10.3%	0.10265398
4	Neither agree nor disagree	185	9.3%	0.09263896
5	Disagree somewhat	183	9.2%	0.09163746
6	Disagree	364	18.2%	0.18227341
7	Strongly disagree	434	21.7%	0.21732599
8	No opinion	60	3.0%	0.03004507
97	Not answered	36	1.8%	0.01802704
98	Not asked	8000		NA

r27_dvfos_2

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The state must pay compensation to the Sami reindeer herders, but allow the installation to remain there.
Pre-question text:	This winter we have seen demonstrations in Oslo in connection with the so-called Fosen case, 500 days after the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the wind turbines on the reindeer grazing grounds in Fosen in South Trøndelag were installed in contravention of the Sami people’s human rights. However, the Supreme Court has not said whether or not the installation should be closed down. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	The state must pay compensation to the Sami reindeer herders, but allow the installation to remain there.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [Shown on the same page as [r27_dvfoso].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	183	9.2%	0.09163746
2	Agree	363	18.2%	0.18177266
3	Agree somewhat	396	19.8%	0.19829745
4	Neither agree nor disagree	216	10.8%	0.10816224
5	Disagree somewhat	178	8.9%	0.08913370
6	Disagree	287	14.4%	0.14371557
7	Strongly disagree	252	12.6%	0.12618928
8	No opinion	76	3.8%	0.03805709
97	Not answered	46	2.3%	0.02303455
98	Not asked	8000		NA

r27_dvfos_3

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The wind turbines should stay there and the state should not pay compensation to the Sami reindeer herders.
Pre-question text:	This winter we have seen demonstrations in Oslo in connection with the so-called Fosen case, 500 days after the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the wind turbines on the reindeer grazing grounds in Fosen in South Trøndelag were installed in contravention of the Sami people’s human rights. However, the Supreme Court has not said whether or not the installation should be closed down. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	The wind turbines should stay there and the state should not pay compensation to the Sami reindeer herders.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [Shown on the same page as [r27_dvfoso].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	95	4.8%	0.04757136
2	Agree	143	7.2%	0.07160741
3	Agree somewhat	174	8.7%	0.08713070
4	Neither agree nor disagree	179	9.0%	0.08963445
5	Disagree somewhat	207	10.4%	0.10365548
6	Disagree	454	22.7%	0.22734101
7	Strongly disagree	622	31.1%	0.31146720
8	No opinion	74	3.7%	0.03705558
97	Not answered	49	2.5%	0.02453681
98	Not asked	8000		NA

r27_dvfos_4

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s final report should include clarification of Sami land rights.
Pre-question text:	This winter we have seen demonstrations in Oslo in connection with the so-called Fosen case, 500 days after the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the wind turbines on the reindeer grazing grounds in Fosen in South Trøndelag were installed in contravention of the Sami people’s human rights. However, the Supreme Court has not said whether or not the installation should be closed down. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	The Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s final report should include clarification of Sami land rights.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [Shown on the same page as [r27_dvfoso].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	277	13.9%	0.13870806
2	Agree	615	30.8%	0.30796194
3	Agree somewhat	326	16.3%	0.16324487
4	Neither agree nor disagree	305	15.3%	0.15272909
5	Disagree somewhat	66	3.3%	0.03304957
6	Disagree	104	5.2%	0.05207812
7	Strongly disagree	104	5.2%	0.05207812
8	No opinion	161	8.1%	0.08062093
97	Not answered	39	2.0%	0.01952929
98	Not asked	8000		NA

r27_dvfos_5

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The Fosen case will hinder the reconciliation process between the Sami and the state.
Pre-question text:	This winter we have seen demonstrations in Oslo in connection with the so-called Fosen case, 500 days after the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the wind turbines on the reindeer grazing grounds in Fosen in South Trøndelag were installed in contravention of the Sami people’s human rights. However, the Supreme Court has not said whether or not the installation should be closed down. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	The Fosen case will hinder the reconciliation process between the Sami and the state.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [Shown on the same page as [r27_dvfoso].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	123	6.2%	0.06159239
2	Agree	311	15.6%	0.15573360
3	Agree somewhat	470	23.5%	0.23535303
4	Neither agree nor disagree	459	23.0%	0.22984477
5	Disagree somewhat	125	6.3%	0.06259389
6	Disagree	169	8.5%	0.08462694
7	Strongly disagree	50	2.5%	0.02503756
8	No opinion	253	12.7%	0.12669004
97	Not answered	37	1.9%	0.01852779
98	Not asked	8000		NA

r27_dvfoso

Variable label:	Open: Other comments about the Fosen case
Literal question:	If you have any other comments about the Fosen case, please enter them here:
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_dvfos].] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_dvtrp_1

Variable label:	High/low degree: The Truth and Reconciliation Commissions final report will contribute towards reconciliation between: the state and minority groups (Sami, Kvens/Norwegian Finns and Forest Finns)?
Pre-question text:	The Truth and Reconciliation Commission will present its final report on the 1st of June this year. To what extent do you think the findings and recommendations contained in this report will contribute towards reconciliation between …
Literal question:	the state and minority groups (Sami, Kvens/Norwegian Finns and Forest Finns)?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very high degree	16	0.8%	0.008012018
2	A high degree	152	7.6%	0.076114171
3	Some degree	899	45.0%	0.450175263
4	A low degree	458	22.9%	0.229344016
5	Not at all	107	5.4%	0.053580371
6	Do not know	342	17.1%	0.171256885
97	Not answered	23	1.2%	0.011517276
98	Not asked	8000		NA

r27_dvtrp_2

Variable label:	High/low degree: The Truth and Reconciliation Commissions final report will contribute towards reconciliation between: these minority groups and the majority population?
Pre-question text:	The Truth and Reconciliation Commission will present its final report on the 1st of June this year. To what extent do you think the findings and recommendations contained in this report will contribute towards reconciliation between …
Literal question:	these minority groups and the majority population?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very high degree	9	0.5%	0.00450676
2	A high degree	129	6.5%	0.06459690
3	Some degree	812	40.7%	0.40660991
4	A low degree	529	26.5%	0.26489735
5	Not at all	131	6.6%	0.06559840
6	Do not know	354	17.7%	0.17726590
97	Not answered	33	1.7%	0.01652479
98	Not asked	8000		NA

r27_dvnei

Variable label:	Easier/more difficult: for non-European immigrants to obtain residence in Norway
Literal question:	People have different opinions about immigration from countries outside Europe. Some people believe that such immigration creates major problems and that we cannot do enough to limit immigration. Others believe that non-European immigration is a great advantage and that we should take in more immigrants. What about you? Do you think it should be easier or more difficult for non-European immigrants to obtain residence in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Much easier	67	3.3%	0.03338316
2	Easier	247	12.3%	0.12306926
3	Somewhat easier	710	35.4%	0.35376183
4	Slightly more difficult	560	27.9%	0.27902342
5	More difficult	218	10.9%	0.10861983
6	Much more difficult	178	8.9%	0.08868959
97	Not answered	27	1.3%	0.01345291
98	Not asked	7990		NA

r27_dvnei_pipe

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects an alternative for textpiping in [r27_dvneio].
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1980] [Invalid:8017] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	easier	1024	51.7%	0.5171717
2	more difficult	956	48.3%	0.4828283
Sysmiss		8017		NA

r27_dvneio

Variable label:	Open: What do you think is the best argument for making it [easier/more difficult] for non-European immigrants to be granted residence in Norway?
Literal question:	We would like to know more about your views on non-European immigration. What do you think is the best argument for making it [easier/more difficult] for non-European immigrants to be granted residence in Norway?
Post-question:	Your answer can be either short or long. Preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you prefer.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 5) & (r27_dvnei is answered)] [If [r27_dvnei] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 the textpiping was ‘easier’. If [r27_dvnei] = 4 \| 5 \| 6 the textpiping was ‘more difficult’.] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_dvneioxa_pipe

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects an alternative for textpiping in [r27_dvneioxa] and [r27_dvneioxb].
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1980] [Invalid:8017] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	easier	956	48.3%	0.4828283
2	more difficult	1024	51.7%	0.5171717
Sysmiss		8017		NA

r27_dvneioxb_pipe

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects an alternative for textpiping in [r27_dvneioxa] and [r27_dvneioxb].
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1980] [Invalid:8017] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	positive	956	48.3%	0.4828283
2	sceptical	1024	51.7%	0.5171717
Sysmiss		8017		NA

r27_dvneiox_ran

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent will be exposed for [r27_dvneioxa] or [r27_dvneioxb].
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_group = 5) & (r27_dvnei is answered)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1980] [Invalid:8017] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The respondent is exposed to [27_dvneioxa]	996	50.3%	0.5030303
2	The respondent is exposed to [27_dvneioxb]	984	49.7%	0.4969697
Sysmiss		8017		NA

r27_dvneioxa

Variable label:	Open: What do you think is the best argument for making it [easier/more dificult] for non-European immigrants to be granted residence in Norway?
Literal question:	Some people believe that it should be [easier/more difficult] for non-European immigrants to be granted residence in Norway. Consider the reasons for this opinion, even if you don’t agree. If you had to mention one argument, what do you think is the best argument for making it [easier/more difficult] for non-European immigrants to be granted residence in Norway?
Post-question:	Your answer can be either short or long. Preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you prefer.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_dvneiox_ran = 1) & (r27_group = 5) & (r27_dvnei is answered)] [If [r27_dvnei] = 4 \| 5 \| 6 the textpiping was ‘easier’. If [r27_dvnei] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 the textpiping was ‘more difficult’. Shown on the same page as [r27_dvneioxe].] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_dvneioxb

Variable label:	Open: What do you think that this person thinks is the best argument for making it [easier/more difficult] for non-European immigrants to be granted residence in Norway?
Literal question:	Some people believe that it should be [easier/more difficult] for non-European immigrants to be granted residence in Norway. Try see it from the perspective of those people who have this opinion, even if you don’t agree. Think of an acquaintance who is [positive/sceptical] to non-European immigration, or imagine such a person. Imagine that person’s life and experiences and consider the motives and feelings that lie behind their point of view. What do you think that this person thinks is the best argument for making it [easier/more difficult] for non-European immigrants to be granted residence in Norway?
Post-question:	Your answer can be either short or long. Preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you prefer.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_dvneiox_ran = 2) & (r27_group = 5) & (r27_dvnei is answered)] [If [r27_dvnei] = 4 \| 5 \| 6 the first and third instance of textpiping was ‘easier’, and the second instance of textpiping was ‘positive’. If [r27_dvnei] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 the first and third instance of textpiping was ‘more difficult’, and the second instance of textpiping was ‘sceptical’. Shown on the same page as [r27_dvneioxe].] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_dvneioxe

Variable label:	Do you think [the respondents answer to [r27_dvneioxa]/[r27_dvneioxb]] is a good or bad argument for making it [easier/more difficult] for non-European immigrants to be granted residence in Norway?
Literal question:	What do you think that this person thinks is the best argument for making it [easier/more difficult] for non-European immigrants to be granted residence in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 5) & (r27_dvnei is answered)] [If [r27_dvnei] = 4 \| 5 \| 6 the textpiping was ‘easier’. If [r27_dvnei] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 the textpiping was ‘more difficult’. Shown on the same page as [r27_dvneioxa] or [r27_dvneioxb].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	60	3.0%	0.02989537
2	Good	256	12.8%	0.12755356
3	Fairly good	330	16.4%	0.16442451
4	Neither good nor bad	437	21.8%	0.21773792
5	Not very good	209	10.4%	0.10413553
6	Bad	270	13.5%	0.13452915
7	Very bad	176	8.8%	0.08769307
97	Not answered	269	13.4%	0.13403089
98	Not asked	7990		NA

r27_dmaik

Variable label:	How much would you say you know about machine learning and artificial intelligence?
Literal question:	Machine learning is often referred to as artificial intelligence. Using machine learning involves getting computers to learn how to solve tasks based on data. Computers can often become extremely accurate, although this typically requires a lot of data. Today, machine learning provides the basis for a wide range of services and products, such as search engines, product recommendations, voice recognition, driverless cars, chatGPT and much more. Generally speaking, how much would you say you know about machine learning and artificial intelligence?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A great deal	50	2.5%	0.02491281
2	A lot	273	13.6%	0.13602392
3	A bit	876	43.6%	0.43647235
4	Not much	635	31.6%	0.31639263
5	Nothing at all	129	6.4%	0.06427504
97	Not answered	44	2.2%	0.02192327
98	Not asked	7990		NA

r27_dmaip

Variable label:	Improvement/deterioration of public services: Norwegian authorities’ use of machine learning and artificial intelligence to automate certain tasks and to provide information for decisions.
Literal question:	In some cases, public administration uses machine learning. Machine learning can be used to fully automate certain tasks and to provide decision makers with information or suggestions. Based on what you know, do you think the Norwegian authorities’ use of machine learning and artificial intelligence will lead to an improvement or a deterioration of public services?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Great improvement	48	2.4%	0.02391629
2	Improvement	340	16.9%	0.16940708
3	Some improvement	546	27.2%	0.27204783
4	Neither improvement nor deterioration	304	15.1%	0.15146986
5	Some deterioration	295	14.7%	0.14698555
6	Deterioration	194	9.7%	0.09666168
7	Great deterioration	41	2.0%	0.02042850
8	Do not know	191	9.5%	0.09516692
97	Not answered	48	2.4%	0.02391629
98	Not asked	7990		NA

r27_dmaiw

Variable label:	How concerned are you about the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence in public administration?
Literal question:	How concerned are you about the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence in public administration (e.g. the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV), the Norwegian Tax Administration, various ministries, etc)?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very worried	125	6.2%	0.06228201
2	Worried	379	18.9%	0.18883906
3	Somewhat worried	852	42.5%	0.42451420
4	Not very worried	543	27.1%	0.27055306
5	Not at all worried	56	2.8%	0.02790234
97	Not answered	52	2.6%	0.02590932
98	Not asked	7990		NA

r27_ceelmx_ran

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r27_ceelmx].
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_group = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1964] [Invalid:8033] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Electricity prices should be determined by the market.	654	33.3%	0.3329939
2	Electricity prices should be determined on the basis of supply and demand.	669	34.1%	0.3406314
3	Electricity prices should be determined by the authorities.	641	32.6%	0.3263747
Sysmiss		8033		NA

r27_ceelmx

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: [r27_ceelmx_ran].
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement? [r27_ceelmx_ran]
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 5)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_ceelmxo].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	263	13.1%	0.13104136
2	Disagree	359	17.9%	0.17887394
3	Disagree somewhat	308	15.3%	0.15346288
4	Neither agree nor disagree	276	13.8%	0.13751868
5	Agree somewhat	372	18.5%	0.18535127
6	Agree	260	13.0%	0.12954659
7	Strongly agree	109	5.4%	0.05430992
97	Not answered	60	3.0%	0.02989537
98	Not asked	7990		NA

r27_ceelmxo

Variable label:	Open: Feel free to enter your thoughts about electricity here:
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement? [r27_ceelmx_ran]
Literal question:	Feel free to enter your thoughts about electricity here, if you wish:
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 5)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_ceelmx].] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_pcelc_1

Variable label:	Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Compensate consumers when electricity prices are high
Pre-question text:	The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should…
Literal question:	Compensate consumers when electricity prices are high
Technical description:	[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [Exposed to all respondents who answered [r24_ceelc_1] - [r24_ceelc_6]. Exposed to a selection of respondents who answered [r23_pcelc_1] - [r23_pcelc_6].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	429	29.2%	0.29183673
2	Agree	499	33.9%	0.33945578
3	Somewhat agree	296	20.1%	0.20136054
4	Neither agree nor disagree	89	6.1%	0.06054422
5	Somewhat disagree	61	4.1%	0.04149660
6	Disagree	45	3.1%	0.03061224
7	Strongly disagree	32	2.2%	0.02176871
97	Not answered	19	1.3%	0.01292517
98	Not asked	8527		NA

r27_pcelc_2

Variable label:	Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Expand Norwegian power production
Pre-question text:	The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should…
Literal question:	Expand Norwegian power production
Technical description:	[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [Exposed to all respondents who answered [r24_ceelc_1] - [r24_ceelc_6]. Exposed to a selection of respondents who answered [r23_pcelc_1] - [r23_pcelc_6].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	452	30.7%	0.30748299
2	Agree	545	37.1%	0.37074830
3	Somewhat agree	253	17.2%	0.17210884
4	Neither agree nor disagree	112	7.6%	0.07619048
5	Somewhat disagree	43	2.9%	0.02925170
6	Disagree	30	2.0%	0.02040816
7	Strongly disagree	17	1.2%	0.01156463
97	Not answered	18	1.2%	0.01224490
98	Not asked	8527		NA

r27_pcelc_3

Variable label:	Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Export less electricity abroad
Pre-question text:	The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should…
Literal question:	Export less electricity abroad
Technical description:	[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [Exposed to all respondents who answered [r24_ceelc_1] - [r24_ceelc_6]. Exposed to a selection of respondents who answered [r23_pcelc_1] - [r23_pcelc_6].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	457	31.1%	0.310884354
2	Agree	368	25.0%	0.250340136
3	Somewhat agree	281	19.1%	0.191156463
4	Neither agree nor disagree	178	12.1%	0.121088435
5	Somewhat disagree	83	5.6%	0.056462585
6	Disagree	65	4.4%	0.044217687
7	Strongly disagree	25	1.7%	0.017006803
97	Not answered	13	0.9%	0.008843537
98	Not asked	8527		NA

r27_pcelc_4

Variable label:	Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Increase financial support for electricity-saving measures
Pre-question text:	The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should…
Literal question:	Increase financial support for electricity-saving measures
Technical description:	[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [Exposed to all respondents who answered [r24_ceelc_1] - [r24_ceelc_6]. Exposed to a selection of respondents who answered [r23_pcelc_1] - [r23_pcelc_6].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	544	37.0%	0.370068027
2	Agree	541	36.8%	0.368027211
3	Somewhat agree	221	15.0%	0.150340136
4	Neither agree nor disagree	92	6.3%	0.062585034
5	Somewhat disagree	30	2.0%	0.020408163
6	Disagree	12	0.8%	0.008163265
7	Strongly disagree	11	0.7%	0.007482993
97	Not answered	19	1.3%	0.012925170
98	Not asked	8527		NA

r27_pcelc_5

Variable label:	Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Refrain from introducing measures to reduce electricity costs
Pre-question text:	The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should…
Literal question:	Refrain from introducing measures to reduce electricity costs
Technical description:	[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [Exposed to all respondents who answered [r24_ceelc_1] - [r24_ceelc_6]. Exposed to a selection of respondents who answered [r23_pcelc_1] - [r23_pcelc_6].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	28	1.9%	0.01904762
2	Agree	29	2.0%	0.01972789
3	Somewhat agree	67	4.6%	0.04557823
4	Neither agree nor disagree	173	11.8%	0.11768707
5	Somewhat disagree	227	15.4%	0.15442177
6	Disagree	477	32.4%	0.32448980
7	Strongly disagree	391	26.6%	0.26598639
97	Not answered	78	5.3%	0.05306122
98	Not asked	8527		NA

r27_pcelc_6

Variable label:	Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Other: Write here
Pre-question text:	The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should…
Literal question:	Other suggestions: (enter and select if you wish)
Technical description:	[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [Exposed to all respondents who answered [r24_ceelc_1] - [r24_ceelc_6]. Exposed to a selection of respondents who answered [r23_pcelc_1] - [r23_pcelc_6].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	228	15.5%	0.155102041
2	Agree	21	1.4%	0.014285714
3	Somewhat agree	6	0.4%	0.004081633
4	Neither agree nor disagree	40	2.7%	0.027210884
5	Somewhat disagree	11	0.7%	0.007482993
6	Disagree	21	1.4%	0.014285714
7	Strongly disagree	35	2.4%	0.023809524
97	Not answered	1108	75.4%	0.753741497
98	Not asked	8527		NA

r27_pcelc_6_other

Variable label:	Open: Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Other: Write here
Pre-question text:	The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that the authorities should…
Literal question:	Other suggestions: (enter and select if you wish)
Technical description:	[Answer list display order: Randomize] [Exposed to all respondents who answered [r24_ceelc_1] - [r24_ceelc_6]. Exposed to a selection of respondents who answered [r23_pcelc_1] - [r23_pcelc_6].] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_meira_1

Variable label:	Most/least like to read about: Climate change
Pre-question text:	Below are a number of topics that Norwegian newspapers write about. Please rank the topics according to which one you would like to know more about. The topic you most want to read more about should be clicked first, while the topic you least want to read more about should be clicked last, so that 1 = what you most want to read more about and 5 = what you least want to read more about.
Literal question:	Climate change
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Have ranked climate change as number 1	2162	47.7%	0.47652634
2	Have ranked climate change as number 2	770	17.0%	0.16971567
3	Have ranked climate change as number 3	524	11.5%	0.11549482
4	Have ranked climate change as number 4	371	8.2%	0.08177210
5	Have ranked climate change as number 5	414	9.1%	0.09124972
97	Not answered	296	6.5%	0.06524135
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_meira_2

Variable label:	Most/least like to read about: Abortion legislation
Pre-question text:	Below are a number of topics that Norwegian newspapers write about. Please rank the topics according to which one you would like to know more about. The topic you most want to read more about should be clicked first, while the topic you least want to read more about should be clicked last, so that 1 = what you most want to read more about and 5 = what you least want to read more about.
Literal question:	Abortion legislation
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Have ranked abortion legislation as number 1	483	10.6%	0.1064580
2	Have ranked abortion legislation as number 2	685	15.1%	0.1509808
3	Have ranked abortion legislation as number 3	980	21.6%	0.2160018
4	Have ranked abortion legislation as number 4	1003	22.1%	0.2210712
5	Have ranked abortion legislation as number 5	954	21.0%	0.2102711
97	Not answered	432	9.5%	0.0952171
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_meira_3

Variable label:	Most/least like to read about: Road tolls
Pre-question text:	Below are a number of topics that Norwegian newspapers write about. Please rank the topics according to which one you would like to know more about. The topic you most want to read more about should be clicked first, while the topic you least want to read more about should be clicked last, so that 1 = what you most want to read more about and 5 = what you least want to read more about.
Literal question:	Road tolls
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Have ranked road tolls as number 1	445	9.8%	0.09808243
2	Have ranked road tolls as number 2	594	13.1%	0.13092352
3	Have ranked road tolls as number 3	603	13.3%	0.13290721
4	Have ranked road tolls as number 4	854	18.8%	0.18823011
5	Have ranked road tolls as number 5	1640	36.1%	0.36147234
97	Not answered	401	8.8%	0.08838439
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_meira_4

Variable label:	Most/least like to read about: Immigration
Pre-question text:	Below are a number of topics that Norwegian newspapers write about. Please rank the topics according to which one you would like to know more about. The topic you most want to read more about should be clicked first, while the topic you least want to read more about should be clicked last, so that 1 = what you most want to read more about and 5 = what you least want to read more about.
Literal question:	Immigration
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Have ranked immigration as number 1	660	14.5%	0.14547058
2	Have ranked immigration as number 2	1286	28.3%	0.28344721
3	Have ranked immigration as number 3	1184	26.1%	0.26096540
4	Have ranked immigration as number 4	718	15.8%	0.15825435
5	Have ranked immigration as number 5	324	7.1%	0.07141283
97	Not answered	365	8.0%	0.08044964
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_meira_5

Variable label:	Most/least like to read about: Merging municipalities
Pre-question text:	Below are a number of topics that Norwegian newspapers write about. Please rank the topics according to which one you would like to know more about. The topic you most want to read more about should be clicked first, while the topic you least want to read more about should be clicked last, so that 1 = what you most want to read more about and 5 = what you least want to read more about.
Literal question:	Merging municipalities
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Have ranked merging municipalities as number 1	636	14.0%	0.14018074
2	Have ranked merging municipalities as number 2	902	19.9%	0.19880979
3	Have ranked merging municipalities as number 3	832	18.3%	0.18338109
4	Have ranked merging municipalities as number 4	1099	24.2%	0.24223055
5	Have ranked merging municipalities as number 5	699	15.4%	0.15406656
97	Not answered	369	8.1%	0.08133128
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_ceinax_ran

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r27_ceinax].
Technical description:	[Randomized if (rekruttert = 25)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1208] [Invalid:8789] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	He's obviously angry.	372	30.8%	0.3079470
2	He's obviously sad.	436	36.1%	0.3609272
3	[BLANK]	400	33.1%	0.3311258
Sysmiss		8789		NA

r27_ceinax_1

Variable label:	Extent of confidence in: Scientist telling that we are currently unable to keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees
Pre-question text:	Imagine the following situation: A scientist is being interviewed about climate change on a TV news programme. [r27_ceinax_ran] He says that we will not reach the goal of limiting global warming to below 1.5 degrees unless more is done.
Literal question:	To what extent do you have confidence in the information provided by this scientist?
Technical description:	[Asked if (rekruttert = 25)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Not at all	58	4.8%	0.04757998
2	A low degree	105	8.6%	0.08613618
3	Some degree	403	33.1%	0.33059885
4	A high degree	456	37.4%	0.37407711
5	A very high degree	176	14.4%	0.14438064
97	Not answered	21	1.7%	0.01722724
98	Not asked	8778		NA

r27_ceinax_2

Variable label:	To what extent do you take seriously: Scientist telling that we are currently unable to keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees
Pre-question text:	Imagine the following situation: A scientist is being interviewed about climate change on a TV news programme. [r27_ceinax_ran] He says that we will not reach the goal of limiting global warming to below 1.5 degrees unless more is done.
Literal question:	To what extent do you take the scientist seriously?
Technical description:	[Asked if (rekruttert = 25)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Not at all	54	4.4%	0.04429861
2	A low degree	114	9.4%	0.09351928
3	Some degree	432	35.4%	0.35438884
4	A high degree	433	35.5%	0.35520919
5	A very high degree	162	13.3%	0.13289582
97	Not answered	24	2.0%	0.01968827
98	Not asked	8778		NA

r27_pccoo

Variable label:	Most people in general can be trusted
Literal question:	Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0 - Cannot be careful enough	19	0.6%	0.006099518
1	1	26	0.8%	0.008346709
2	2	46	1.5%	0.014767255
3	3	121	3.9%	0.038844302
4	4	105	3.4%	0.033707865
5	5	236	7.6%	0.075762440
6	6	309	9.9%	0.099197432
7	7	746	23.9%	0.239486356
8	8	995	31.9%	0.319422151
9	9	349	11.2%	0.112038523
10	10 – Most people can be trusted	114	3.7%	0.036597111
97	Not answered	49	1.6%	0.015730337
98	Not asked	6882		NA

r27_pccos

Variable label:	What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Literal question:	What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very high degree	178	5.7%	0.05714286
2	A high degree	1415	45.4%	0.45425361
3	Some degree	1020	32.7%	0.32744783
4	A low degree	360	11.6%	0.11556982
5	Not at all	105	3.4%	0.03370787
97	Not answered	37	1.2%	0.01187801
98	Not asked	6882		NA

r27_pcecz

Variable label:	Assessment of: The financial situation in Norway in a year
Literal question:	What do you think about the financial situation in Norway in a year?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
5	Much better than today	15	0.5%	0.004815409
4	Better than today	560	18.0%	0.179775281
3	Neither worse nor better than today	1546	49.6%	0.496308186
2	Worse than today	847	27.2%	0.271910112
1	Much worse than today	80	2.6%	0.025682183
97	Not answered	67	2.2%	0.021508828
98	Not asked	6882		NA

r27_hedeh_ran

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects one of the vignettes in [r27_hedehx] the responent will be exposed to.
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2) & (r27_panelgroup = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1528] [Invalid:8469] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Group 1 (Anne, lunchbreak work)	375	24.5%	0.2454188
2	Group 2 (Arne, lunchbreak work)	400	26.2%	0.2617801
3	Group 3 (Anne, lunch friends)	382	25.0%	0.2500000
4	Group 4 (Arne, lunch friends)	371	24.3%	0.2428010
Sysmiss		8469		NA

r27_hedehx1a

Variable label:	What do you think Anne is most likely to do?
Pre-question text:	Anne arrives a bit late for her lunch break at work because she has been to see her GP. She has been feeling sad for several weeks. Everything is hard work and she no longer finds any joy in the things she usually enjoys. She is sleeping badly, has lost her appetite and keeps thinking that it would be better for her family if she just disappeared. Anne sits down with three good colleagues and says that she is late because she has been to the doctor. One of her colleagues says: “Oh yes, what’s wrong with you?”
Literal question:	Of the options below, what do you think Anne is most likely to do?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1) & (r27_hedeh_ran = 1)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_hedehx1b], and [r27_hedehx1c].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	She answers quite honestly about how she feels	90	24.0%	0.240
2	She makes something up or avoids answering her colleague's question	282	75.2%	0.752
97	Not answered	3	0.8%	0.008
98	Not asked	9622		NA

r27_hedehx1b

Variable label:	What do you think Anne should do?
Pre-question text:	Anne arrives a bit late for her lunch break at work because she has been to see her GP. She has been feeling sad for several weeks. Everything is hard work and she no longer finds any joy in the things she usually enjoys. She is sleeping badly, has lost her appetite and keeps thinking that it would be better for her family if she just disappeared. Anne sits down with three good colleagues and says that she is late because she has been to the doctor. One of her colleagues says: “Oh yes, what’s wrong with you?”
Literal question:	Of the options below, what do you think Anne should do?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1) & (r27_hedeh_ran = 1)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_hedehex1a], and [r27_hedehx1c].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Answer quite honestly about how she feels	336	89.6%	0.896
2	Make something up or avoid answering her colleague's question	39	10.4%	0.104
97	Not answered	0	0.0%	0.000
98	Not asked	9622		NA

r27_hedehx1c

Variable label:	What would you do?
Pre-question text:	Anne arrives a bit late for her lunch break at work because she has been to see her GP. She has been feeling sad for several weeks. Everything is hard work and she no longer finds any joy in the things she usually enjoys. She is sleeping badly, has lost her appetite and keeps thinking that it would be better for her family if she just disappeared. Anne sits down with three good colleagues and says that she is late because she has been to the doctor. One of her colleagues says: “Oh yes, what’s wrong with you?”
Literal question:	Of the options below, what would you do?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1) & (r27_hedeh_ran = 1)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_hedehx1a], and [r27_hedehx1b].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Answer quite honestly about how you feel	245	65.3%	0.653333333
2	Make something up or avoid answering your colleague's question	128	34.1%	0.341333333
97	Not answered	2	0.5%	0.005333333
98	Not asked	9622		NA

r27_hedehx2a

Variable label:	What do you think Arne is most likely to do?
Pre-question text:	Arne arrives a bit late for his lunch break at work because he has been to see his GP. He has been feeling sad for several weeks. Everything is hard work and he no longer finds any joy in the things he usually enjoys. He is sleeping badly, has lost his appetite and keeps thinking that it would be better for his family if he just disappeared. Arne sits down with three good colleagues and says that he is late because he has been to the doctor. One of his colleagues says: “Oh yes, what’s wrong with you?”
Literal question:	Of the options below, what do you think Arne is most likely to do?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1) & (r27_hedeh_ran = 2)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_hedehx2b], and [r27_hedehx2c].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	He answers quite honestly about how he feels	54	13.5%	0.1350
2	He makes something up or avoids answering his colleague's question	343	85.8%	0.8575
97	Not answered	3	0.7%	0.0075
98	Not asked	9597		NA

r27_hedehx2b

Variable label:	What do you think Arne should do?
Pre-question text:	Arne arrives a bit late for his lunch break at work because he has been to see his GP. He has been feeling sad for several weeks. Everything is hard work and he no longer finds any joy in the things he usually enjoys. He is sleeping badly, has lost his appetite and keeps thinking that it would be better for his family if he just disappeared. Arne sits down with three good colleagues and says that he is late because he has been to the doctor. One of his colleagues says: “Oh yes, what’s wrong with you?”
Literal question:	Of the options below, what do you think Arne should do?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1) & (r27_hedeh_ran = 2)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_hedehex2a], and [r27_hedehx2c].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Answer quite honestly about how he feels	359	89.7%	0.8975
2	Make something up or avoid answering his colleague's question	38	9.5%	0.0950
97	Not answered	3	0.7%	0.0075
98	Not asked	9597		NA

r27_hedehx2c

Variable label:	What would you do?
Pre-question text:	Arne arrives a bit late for his lunch break at work because he has been to see his GP. He has been feeling sad for several weeks. Everything is hard work and he no longer finds any joy in the things he usually enjoys. He is sleeping badly, has lost his appetite and keeps thinking that it would be better for his family if he just disappeared. Arne sits down with three good colleagues and says that he is late because he has been to the doctor. One of his colleagues says: “Oh yes, what’s wrong with you?”
Literal question:	Of the options below, what would you do?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1) & (r27_hedeh_ran = 2)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_hedehx2a], and [r27_hedehx2b].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Answer quite honestly about how you feel	233	58.3%	0.5825
2	Make something up or avoid answering his colleague's question	159	39.8%	0.3975
97	Not answered	8	2.0%	0.0200
98	Not asked	9597		NA

r27_hedehx3a

Variable label:	What do you think Anne is most likely to do?
Pre-question text:	Anne arrives a little late for a lunch appointment with friends because she has been to see her GP. She has been feeling sad for several weeks. Everything is hard work and she no longer finds any joy in the things she usually enjoys. She is sleeping badly, has lost her appetite and keeps thinking that it would be better for her family if she just disappeared. Anne sits down with three good friends and says that she is late because she has been to the doctor. One of her friends says: “Oh yes, what’s wrong with you?”
Literal question:	Of the options below, what do you think Anne is most likely to do?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1) & (r27_hedeh_ran = 3)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_hedehx3b], and [r27_hedehx3c].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	She answers quite honestly about how she feels	117	30.6%	0.306282723
2	She makes something up or avoids answering her friend's question	264	69.1%	0.691099476
97	Not answered	1	0.3%	0.002617801
98	Not asked	9615		NA

r27_hedehx3b

Variable label:	What do you think Anne should do?
Pre-question text:	Anne arrives a little late for a lunch appointment with friends because she has been to see her GP. She has been feeling sad for several weeks. Everything is hard work and she no longer finds any joy in the things she usually enjoys. She is sleeping badly, has lost her appetite and keeps thinking that it would be better for her family if she just disappeared. Anne sits down with three good friends and says that she is late because she has been to the doctor. One of her friends says: “Oh yes, what’s wrong with you?”
Literal question:	Of the options below, what do you think Anne should do?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1) & (r27_hedeh_ran = 3)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_hedehex3a], and [r27_hedehx3c].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Answer quite honestly about how she feels	362	94.8%	0.947643979
2	Make something up or avoid answering her friend’s question	17	4.5%	0.044502618
97	Not answered	3	0.8%	0.007853403
98	Not asked	9615		NA

r27_hedehx3c

Variable label:	What would you do?
Pre-question text:	Anne arrives a little late for a lunch appointment with friends because she has been to see her GP. She has been feeling sad for several weeks. Everything is hard work and she no longer finds any joy in the things she usually enjoys. She is sleeping badly, has lost her appetite and keeps thinking that it would be better for her family if she just disappeared. Anne sits down with three good friends and says that she is late because she has been to the doctor. One of her friends says: “Oh yes, what’s wrong with you?”
Literal question:	Of the options below, what would you do?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1) & (r27_hedeh_ran = 3)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_hedehx3a], and [r27_hedehx3b].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Answer quite honestly about how you feel	265	69.4%	0.6937173
2	Make something up or avoid answering your friend’s question	113	29.6%	0.2958115
97	Not answered	4	1.0%	0.0104712
98	Not asked	9615		NA

r27_hedehx4a

Variable label:	What do you think Arne is most likely to do?
Pre-question text:	Arne arrives a little late for a lunch appointment with friends because he has been to see his GP. He has been feeling sad for several weeks. Everything is hard work and he no longer finds any joy in the things he usually enjoys. He is sleeping badly, has lost his appetite and keeps thinking that it would be better for his family if he just disappeared. Arne sits down with three good friends and says that he is late because he has been to the doctor. One of his friends says: “Oh yes, what’s wrong with you?”
Literal question:	Of the options below, what do you think Arne is most likely to do?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1) & (r27_hedeh_ran = 4)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_hedehx4b], and [r27_hedehx4c].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	He answers quite honestly about how he feels	84	22.6%	0.22641509
2	He makes something up or avoids answering his friend's question	283	76.3%	0.76280323
97	Not answered	4	1.1%	0.01078167
98	Not asked	9626		NA

r27_hedehx4b

Variable label:	What do you think Arne should do?
Pre-question text:	Arne arrives a little late for a lunch appointment with friends because he has been to see his GP. He has been feeling sad for several weeks. Everything is hard work and he no longer finds any joy in the things he usually enjoys. He is sleeping badly, has lost his appetite and keeps thinking that it would be better for his family if he just disappeared. Arne sits down with three good friends and says that he is late because he has been to the doctor. One of his friends says: “Oh yes, what’s wrong with you?”
Literal question:	Of the options below, what do you think Arne should do?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1) & (r27_hedeh_ran = 4)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_hedehex4a], and [r27_hedehx4c].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Answer quite honestly about how he feels	355	95.7%	0.956873315
2	Make something up or avoid answering his friend’s question	13	3.5%	0.035040431
97	Not answered	3	0.8%	0.008086253
98	Not asked	9626		NA

r27_hedehx4c

Variable label:	What would you do?
Pre-question text:	Arne arrives a little late for a lunch appointment with friends because he has been to see his GP. He has been feeling sad for several weeks. Everything is hard work and he no longer finds any joy in the things he usually enjoys. He is sleeping badly, has lost his appetite and keeps thinking that it would be better for his family if he just disappeared. Arne sits down with three good friends and says that he is late because he has been to the doctor. One of his friends says: “Oh yes, what’s wrong with you?”
Literal question:	Of the options below, what would you do?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1) & (r27_hedeh_ran = 4)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_hedehx4a], and [r27_hedehx4b].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Answer quite honestly about how you feel	283	76.3%	0.76280323
2	Make something up or avoid answering your friend’s question	83	22.4%	0.22371968
97	Not answered	5	1.3%	0.01347709
98	Not asked	9626		NA

r27_pcscc

Variable label:	Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your view on climate change?
Literal question:	Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your view on climate change?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	I don’t believe that the climate is changing.	23	0.7%	0.007383628
2	I don't know whether the climate is changing or not.	117	3.8%	0.037560193
3	I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent due to human action	631	20.3%	0.202568218
4	I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to human action.	2303	73.9%	0.739325843
97	Not answered	41	1.3%	0.013162119
98	Not asked	6882		NA

r27_pcwcc

Variable label:	How worried are you about climate change?
Literal question:	How worried are you about climate change?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Not at all worried	69	4.4%	0.04389313
2	Not very worried	205	13.0%	0.13040712
3	Somewhat worried	462	29.4%	0.29389313
4	Worried	521	33.1%	0.33142494
5	Very worried	290	18.4%	0.18447837
97	Not answered	25	1.6%	0.01590331
98	Not asked	8425		NA

r27_pcoil

Variable label:	Development of the oil and gas industry in Norway. In 10 to 15 years, the industry should be…
Literal question:	There is frequent debate about how the oil and gas industry in Norway should be developed over the next 10 to 15 years. Which of the following options is closest to your view? In 10 to 15 years, the industry should be …
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	As large as possible	165	5.3%	0.05296950
2	Larger than today	179	5.7%	0.05746388
3	Just as large as today	1004	32.2%	0.32231140
4	Smaller than today	1179	37.8%	0.37849117
5	As small as possible	538	17.3%	0.17271268
97	Not answered	50	1.6%	0.01605136
98	Not asked	6882		NA

r27_pcimm

Variable label:	Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
Literal question:	In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very great advantage	158	5.1%	0.05072231
2	A great advantage	758	24.3%	0.24333868
3	A slight advantage	1209	38.8%	0.38812199
4	Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage	382	12.3%	0.12263242
5	A slight disadvantage	393	12.6%	0.12616372
6	A great disadvantage	126	4.0%	0.04044944
7	A very great disadvantage	50	1.6%	0.01605136
97	Not answered	39	1.3%	0.01252006
98	Not asked	6882		NA

r27_pcref

Variable label:	Your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum.
Literal question:	What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Much easier	84	2.7%	0.02696629
2	Easier	366	11.7%	0.11749599
3	Somewhat easier	622	20.0%	0.19967897
4	Same as today	1304	41.9%	0.41861958
5	Slightly more difficult	356	11.4%	0.11428571
6	More difficult	215	6.9%	0.06902087
7	Much more difficult	119	3.8%	0.03820225
97	Not answered	49	1.6%	0.01573034
98	Not asked	6882		NA

r27_pcint

Variable label:	As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
Literal question:	As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	173	5.6%	0.05553772
2	Good	945	30.3%	0.30337079
3	Somewhat good	719	23.1%	0.23081862
4	Neither good nor bad	378	12.1%	0.12134831
5	Somewhat poor	489	15.7%	0.15698234
6	Poor	273	8.8%	0.08764045
7	Very poor	84	2.7%	0.02696629
97	Not answered	54	1.7%	0.01733547
98	Not asked	6882		NA

r27_pcldpk

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the following Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Christian Democratic Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	607	13.4%	0.13378885
2	Really dislike	801	17.7%	0.17654838
3	Dislike somewhat	991	21.8%	0.21842627
4	Neither dislike nor like	1008	22.2%	0.22217324
5	Like somewhat	756	16.7%	0.16662993
6	Really like	197	4.3%	0.04342076
7	Intensely like	61	1.3%	0.01344501
97	Not answered	116	2.6%	0.02556756
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_pcldph

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the following Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Conservative Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	227	5.0%	0.05003306
2	Really dislike	514	11.3%	0.11329072
3	Dislike somewhat	729	16.1%	0.16067886
4	Neither dislike nor like	493	10.9%	0.10866211
5	Like somewhat	1125	24.8%	0.24796121
6	Really like	918	20.2%	0.20233635
7	Intensely like	412	9.1%	0.09080890
97	Not answered	119	2.6%	0.02622879
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_pcldpf

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Progress Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the following Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Progress Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	1198	26.4%	0.26405114
2	Really dislike	933	20.6%	0.20564250
3	Dislike somewhat	661	14.6%	0.14569099
4	Neither dislike nor like	450	9.9%	0.09918448
5	Like somewhat	710	15.6%	0.15649107
6	Really like	343	7.6%	0.07560062
7	Intensely like	126	2.8%	0.02777166
97	Not answered	116	2.6%	0.02556756
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_pcldpv

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the following Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Liberal Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	299	6.6%	0.06590258
2	Really dislike	473	10.4%	0.10425391
3	Dislike somewhat	891	19.6%	0.19638528
4	Neither dislike nor like	1146	25.3%	0.25258982
5	Like somewhat	1122	24.7%	0.24729998
6	Really like	388	8.6%	0.08551907
7	Intensely like	98	2.2%	0.02160018
97	Not answered	120	2.6%	0.02644920
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_pcldpsv

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Socialist Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the following Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Socialist Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	547	12.1%	0.12056425
2	Really dislike	640	14.1%	0.14106238
3	Dislike somewhat	724	16.0%	0.15957681
4	Neither dislike nor like	660	14.5%	0.14547058
5	Like somewhat	952	21.0%	0.20983028
6	Really like	687	15.1%	0.15142164
7	Intensely like	206	4.5%	0.04540445
97	Not answered	121	2.7%	0.02666961
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_pcldpsp

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Centre Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the following Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Centre Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	531	11.7%	0.11703769
2	Really dislike	813	17.9%	0.17919330
3	Dislike somewhat	1035	22.8%	0.22812431
4	Neither dislike nor like	886	19.5%	0.19528323
5	Like somewhat	887	19.6%	0.19550364
6	Really like	216	4.8%	0.04760855
7	Intensely like	47	1.0%	0.01035927
97	Not answered	122	2.7%	0.02689002
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_pcldpm

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Green Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the following Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Green Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	881	19.4%	0.19418118
2	Really dislike	624	13.8%	0.13753582
3	Dislike somewhat	726	16.0%	0.16001763
4	Neither dislike nor like	625	13.8%	0.13775623
5	Like somewhat	978	21.6%	0.21556094
6	Really like	431	9.5%	0.09499669
7	Intensely like	151	3.3%	0.03328190
97	Not answered	121	2.7%	0.02666961
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_pcldpa

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Labour Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the following Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Labour Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	364	8.0%	0.08022923
2	Really dislike	520	11.5%	0.11461318
3	Dislike somewhat	749	16.5%	0.16508706
4	Neither dislike nor like	537	11.8%	0.11836015
5	Like somewhat	1343	29.6%	0.29601058
6	Really like	767	16.9%	0.16905444
7	Intensely like	142	3.1%	0.03129821
97	Not answered	115	2.5%	0.02534715
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_pcldpr

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Red Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the following Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Red Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	868	19.1%	0.19131585
2	Really dislike	726	16.0%	0.16001763
3	Dislike somewhat	642	14.2%	0.14150320
4	Neither dislike nor like	621	13.7%	0.13687459
5	Like somewhat	974	21.5%	0.21467930
6	Really like	405	8.9%	0.08926603
7	Intensely like	177	3.9%	0.03901256
97	Not answered	124	2.7%	0.02733084
98	Not asked	5460		NA

r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig

Variable label:	The respondents view on statement about increased prices on meat.
Technical description:	[If [r27_cemep] = 1 \| 2 or [r27_cemep1] = 2 the second alternative is selected. If [27_cemep] = 4 \| 5 or [r27_cemep1] = 1 the first alternative is selected. For remaining respondents no alternative is selected.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4446] [Invalid:5551] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Agree	1712	38.5%	0.3850652
0	Disagree	2734	61.5%	0.6149348
Sysmiss		5551		NA

r27_menewx_abort_enig

Variable label:	The respondents view on statement about prolonged right to self-determined abortion.
Technical description:	[If [r27_faabe] = 1 \| 2 or [r27_faabe1] = 2 the second alternative is selected. If [27_faabe] = 4 \| 5 or [r27_faabe1] = 1 the first alternative is selected. For remaining respondents no alternative is selected.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4421] [Invalid:5576] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Agree	2086	47.2%	0.471839
0	Disagree	2335	52.8%	0.528161
Sysmiss		5576		NA

r27_menewx1_overskrift1

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx1a] based on the respondents values in [r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig] and [r27_menewx_abort_enig].
Technical description:	[Selects first headline in [r27_menewx1a] based on answers in [r27_menewx_kjottpris] and [27_menewx_abort]. The headline must be thematically different, and have the opposite journalistic angle than [r27_menewx1_overskrift2]. Column 1 is randomly placed between first and last in the table in [r27_menewx1a].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing Norwegian emissions.	568	12.9%	0.1288566
2	“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed for eating meat.	558	12.7%	0.1265880
3	New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals.	542	12.3%	0.1229583
4	Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway.	550	12.5%	0.1247731
5	Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22. “We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is outdated and has played out its role.”	570	12.9%	0.1293103
6	Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined abortion is extended to week 22.	547	12.4%	0.1240926
7	Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31).	533	12.1%	0.1209165
8	Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby a name in week 22,” says Ida (32).	540	12.3%	0.1225045
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_overskrift2

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx1a] based on the respondents values in [r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig] and [r27_menewx_abort_enig].
Technical description:	[Selects second headline in [r27_menewx1a] based on answers in [r27_menewx_kjottpris] and [27_menewx_abort]. The headline must be thematically different, and have the opposite journalistic angle than [r27_menewx1_overskrift1]. Column 2 is randomly placed between first and last in the table in [r27_menewx1a].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing Norwegian emissions.	568	12.9%	0.1288566
2	“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed for eating meat.	551	12.5%	0.1250000
3	New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals.	556	12.6%	0.1261343
4	Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway.	515	11.7%	0.1168330
5	Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22. “We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is outdated and has played out its role.”	548	12.4%	0.1243194
6	Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined abortion is extended to week 22.	579	13.1%	0.1313521
7	Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31).	566	12.8%	0.1284029
8	Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby a name in week 22,” says Ida (32).	525	11.9%	0.1191016
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_tema1

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects a theme based on [r27_menewx1_overskrift1] for the article in the first column in [r27_menewx1a]
Technical description:	[Opposite value from [r27_menewx1_tema2]. Set by deducing theme from [r27_menewx1a_overskrift1].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Meat prices	2218	50.3%	0.503176
2	Extension of the right to self-determined abortion to 22 weeks	2190	49.7%	0.496824
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_tema2

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects a theme based on [r27_menewx1_overskrift2] for the article in the second column in [r27_menewx1a]
Technical description:	[Opposite value from [r27_menewx1_tema1]. Set by deducing theme from [r27_menewx1a_overskrift2].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Meat prices	2190	49.7%	0.496824
2	Extension of the right to self-determined abortion to 22 weeks	2218	50.3%	0.503176
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_vinkling1

Variable label:	Experiment. Sets journalistic angle of overskrift1 in menewx1a based on theme in [r27_menewx1a_overskrift1]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx1_vinkling2].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Headline 1 is angled in favour of the respondents point of view	2186	49.6%	0.4959165
2	Headline 1 is angled in opposition to the respondents point of view	2222	50.4%	0.5040835
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_vinkling2

Variable label:	Experiment. Sets journalistic angle of overskrift2 in menewx1a based on theme in [r27_menewx1a_overskrift2]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx1_vinkling1].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Headline 2 is angled in favour of the respondents point of view	2222	50.4%	0.5040835
2	Headline 2 is angled in opposition to the respondents point of view	2186	49.6%	0.4959165
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_tid1

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects time for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx1a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx1_tid2].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	2 minutes ago	2181	49.5%	0.4947822
2	5 days ago	2227	50.5%	0.5052178
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_tid2

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects time for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx1a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx1_tid1].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	2 minutes ago	2227	50.5%	0.5052178
2	5 days ago	2181	49.5%	0.4947822
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_populaer1

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects popularity for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx1a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx1_populaer2].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	One of the most widely read cases on the front pages right now.	2242	50.9%	0.5086207
2	One of the least widely read cases on the front pages right now.	2166	49.1%	0.4913793
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_populaer2

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects popularity for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx1a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx1_populaer1].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	One of the most widely read cases on the front pages right now.	2166	49.1%	0.4913793
2	One of the least widely read cases on the front pages right now.	2242	50.9%	0.5086207
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_perspop1

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects whether the article is widely read within the respondents demography or not for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx1a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [27_menewx1_perspop2]. The respondents gender, age group, and region is piped into the question text.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Match: “This article is widely read among [gender] in the [age group] living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.”	2197	49.8%	0.498412
2	No match: “This article is not widely read among [gender] in the [age group] living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.”	2211	50.2%	0.501588
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_perspop2

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects whether the article is widely read within the respondents demography or not for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx1a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [27_menewx1_perspop1]. The respondents gender, age group, and region is piped into the question text.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Match: “This article is widely read among [gender] in the [age group] living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.”	2211	50.2%	0.501588
2	No match: “This article is not widely read among [gender] in the [age group] living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.”	2197	49.8%	0.498412
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_sted1

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects place for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx1a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx1_sted2]. If the first element was selected the respondent was shown the name of its home municipality. If the second alternative was selected the respondent was shown a randomly selected municipality from a county different fro the respondents home county. The municipalities Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger, Trondheim, and Tromsø are not selected. Municipalities from Viken would not be selected if the respondent has Oslo as their home municipality.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Close	2233	50.7%	0.5065789
2	Distant	2175	49.3%	0.4934211
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_sted2

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects place for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx1a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx1_sted1]. If the first element was selected the respondent was shown the name of its home municipality. If the second alternative was selected the respondent was shown a randomly selected municipality from a county different fro the respondents home county. The municipalities Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger, Trondheim, and Tromsø are not selected. Municipalities from Viken would not be selected if the respondent has Oslo as their home municipality.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Close	2175	49.3%	0.4934211
2	Distant	2233	50.7%	0.5065789
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_lang1

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects length for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx1a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value of [r27_menewx_lang2].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	2 minutes	2207	50.1%	0.5006806
2	15 minutes	2201	49.9%	0.4993194
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_lang2

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects length for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx1a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value of [r27_menewx_lang1].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	2 minutes	2201	49.9%	0.4993194
2	15 minutes	2207	50.1%	0.5006806
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_rangering1

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects element for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx1a]. Selection conditional on answers given in [r27_meira]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value of [27_menewx_rangering2]. Values selected based on the respondents ranking of topics in [r27_meira]. If the topic ‘climate change’ is ranked higher than ‘abortion legislation’ in [r27_meira], the article on meat prices is suggested. If the topic ‘abortion legislation’ is ranked higher than ‘climate change’, the article on abortion legislation is selected. If [r27_meira] is unanswered, the initial random sorting of [r27_meira] is selected.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	You have previously indicated that you are interested in knowing more about the subject of the article. The article has therefore been suggested to you, based on your ranking of the topic.	2224	50.5%	0.5045372
2	You have previously indicated that you are less interested in knowing more about the subject of the article. The article has therefore not been suggested to you, based on your ranking of the topic.	2184	49.5%	0.4954628
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_rangering2

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects element for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx1a]. Selection conditional on answers given in [r27_meira]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value of [27_menewx_rangering1]. Values selected based on the respondents ranking of topics in [r27_meira]. If the topic ‘climate change’ is ranked higher than ‘abortion legislation’ in [r27_meira], the article on meat prices is suggested. If the topic ‘abortion legislation’ is ranked higher than ‘climate change’, the article on abortion legislation is selected. If [r27_meira] is unanswered, the initial random sorting of [r27_meira] is selected.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	You have previously indicated that you are interested in knowing more about the subject of the article. The article has therefore been suggested to you, based on your ranking of the topic.	2184	49.5%	0.4954628
2	You have previously indicated that you are less interested in knowing more about the subject of the article. The article has therefore not been suggested to you, based on your ranking of the topic.	2224	50.5%	0.5045372
Sysmiss		5589		NA

r27_menewx1_roworder

Variable label:

Experiment. Shows the random order of the attributes shown in the table for [r27_menewx1a] and [r27_menewx2a].

Technical description:

[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.]

[The random order of the attributes that was shown in the table in [r27_menewx1a] and [27_menewx2a].

1 = “Headline of the article” (appears always on top)

2 = “The article was published:”

3 = “The general popularity of the article:”

4 = “The popularity of the article among people like you:”

5 = “The article mentions the following place:”

6 = “How long it takes to read the entire article”

7 = “Your ranking of the topic”]

Technical attributes:

[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:4408] [Invalid:5589] [Range:-]

r27_menewx1a

Variable label:	Experiment. Recommendation algorithms effect on news choices.
Literal question:	The table below shows the headline of two genuine news stories which have been published in Norwegian online newspapers (e.g. NRK, TV2, VG, and Nettavisen). Please read all the information in the table and consider the question below. Story 1 [r27_menewx1a_overskrift1] [r27_menewx1a_tid1] [r27_menewx1a_populaer1] [r27_menewx1a_perspop1] [r27_menewx1a_sted1] [r27_menewx1a_lang1] [r27_menewx1a_rangering1] Story 2 [r27_menewx1a_overskrift2] [r27_menewx1a_tid2] [r27_menewx1a_populaer2] [r27_menewx1a_perspop2] [r27_menewx1a_sted2] [r27_menewx1a_lang2] [r27_menewx1a_rangering2] Which of these two stories are you most likely to click on to read more?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Contents of the table was listed in the order set in [r27_menewx1_roworder]. Shown on the same page as [r27_menewx1b], and [r27_menewx1c].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	News story 1	2280	51.7%	0.51712406
2	News story 2	2044	46.4%	0.46359719
97	Not answered	85	1.9%	0.01927875
98	Not asked	5588		NA

r27_menewx1b

Variable label:	How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 1 in order to read more?
Literal question:	On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 1 in order to read more?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Shown on the same page as [r27_menewx1a], and [r27_menewx1c].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Not at all likely	261	5.9%	0.05919710
2	2 - Not very likely	868	19.7%	0.19687004
3	3 - Somewhat likely	1519	34.5%	0.34452257
4	4 - Likely	1311	29.7%	0.29734634
5	5 - Highly likely	402	9.1%	0.09117714
97	Not answered	48	1.1%	0.01088682
98	Not asked	5588		NA

r27_menewx1c

Variable label:	How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 2 in order to read more?
Literal question:	On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 2 in order to read more?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Shown on the same page as [r27_menewx1a], and [r27_menewx1b].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Not at all likely	304	6.9%	0.068949875
2	2 - Not very likely	970	22.0%	0.220004536
3	3 - Somewhat likely	1305	29.6%	0.295985484
4	4 - Likely	1304	29.6%	0.295758675
5	5 - Highly likely	485	11.0%	0.110002268
97	Not answered	41	0.9%	0.009299161
98	Not asked	5588		NA

r27_menewx2_overskrift1

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx2a] based on the respondents values in [r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig] and [r27_menewx_abort_enig].
Technical description:	[Selects first headline in [r27_menewx2a] based on answers in [r27_menewx_kjottpris] and [27_menewx_abort]. The headline must be thematically different, and have the opposite journalistic angle than [r27_menewx2_overskrift2]. Column 1 is randomly placed between first and last in the table in [r27_menewx2a]. The headline cannot have been used in [r27_menewx1a_overskrift1] or [r27_menewx1a_overskrift2].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing Norwegian emissions.	535	12.2%	0.1216739
2	“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed for eating meat.	548	12.5%	0.1246304
3	New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals.	576	13.1%	0.1309984
4	Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway.	562	12.8%	0.1278144
5	Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22. “We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is outdated and has played out its role.”	510	11.6%	0.1159882
6	Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined abortion is extended to week 22.	537	12.2%	0.1221287
7	Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31).	565	12.8%	0.1284967
8	Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby a name in week 22,” says Ida (32).	564	12.8%	0.1282693
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_overskrift2

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx2a] based on the respondents values in [r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig] and [r27_menewx_abort_enig].
Technical description:	[Selects second headline in [r27_menewx2a] based on answers in [r27_menewx_kjottpris] and [27_menewx_abort]. The headline must be thematically different, and have the opposite journalistic angle than [r27_menewx2_overskrift1]. Column 2 is randomly placed between first and last in the table in [r27_menewx2a]. The headline cannot have been used in [r27_menewx1a_overskrift1] or [r27_menewx1a_overskrift2].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing Norwegian emissions.	480	10.9%	0.1091653
2	“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed for eating meat.	588	13.4%	0.1337275
3	New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals.	573	13.0%	0.1303161
4	Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway.	535	12.2%	0.1216739
5	Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22. “We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is outdated and has played out its role.”	548	12.5%	0.1246304
6	Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined abortion is extended to week 22.	570	13.0%	0.1296338
7	Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31).	513	11.7%	0.1166705
8	Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby a name in week 22,” says Ida (32).	590	13.4%	0.1341824
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_tema1

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects a theme based on [r27_menewx1_overskrift1] for the article in the first column in [r27_menewx2a]
Technical description:	[Opposite value from [r27_menewx2_tema2].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Meat prices	2221	50.5%	0.5051171
2	Extension of the right to self-determined abortion to 22 weeks	2176	49.5%	0.4948829
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_tema2

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects a theme based on [r27_menewx1_overskrift2] for the article in the second column in [r27_menewx2a]
Technical description:	[Opposite value from [r27_menewx2_tema1].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Meat prices	2176	49.5%	0.4948829
2	Extension of the right to self-determined abortion to 22 weeks	2221	50.5%	0.5051171
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_vinkling1

Variable label:	Experiment. Sets journalistic angle of overskrift1 in menewx2a based on theme in [r27_menewx2a_overskrift1]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx2_vinkling2].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Headline 1 is angled in favour of the respondents point of view	2178	49.5%	0.4953377
2	Headline 1 is angled in opposition to the respondents point of view	2219	50.5%	0.5046623
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_vinkling2

Variable label:	Experiment. Sets journalistic angle of overskrift2 in menewx2a based on theme in [r27_menewx2a_overskrift2]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx2_vinkling1].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Headline 2 is angled in favour of the respondents point of view	2219	50.5%	0.5046623
2	Headline 2 is angled in opposition to the respondents point of view	2178	49.5%	0.4953377
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_tid1

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects time for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx2a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx2_tid2].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	2 minutes ago	2175	49.5%	0.4946554
2	5 days ago	2222	50.5%	0.5053446
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_tid2

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects time for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx2a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx2_tid1].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	2 minutes ago	2222	50.5%	0.5053446
2	5 days ago	2175	49.5%	0.4946554
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_populaer1

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects popularity for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx2a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx2_populaer2].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	One of the most widely read cases on the front pages right now.	2174	49.4%	0.494428
2	One of the least widely read cases on the front pages right now.	2223	50.6%	0.505572
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_populaer2

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects popularity for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx2a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx2_populaer1].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	One of the most widely read cases on the front pages right now.	2223	50.6%	0.505572
2	One of the least widely read cases on the front pages right now.	2174	49.4%	0.494428
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_perspop1

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects whether the article is widely read within the respondents demography or not for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx2a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [27_menewx2_perspop2]. The respondents gender, age group, and region is piped into the question text.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Match: “This article is widely read among [gender] in the [age group] living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.”	2158	49.1%	0.4907892
2	No match: “This article is not widely read among [gender] in the [age group] living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.”	2239	50.9%	0.5092108
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_perspop2

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects whether the article is widely read within the respondents demography or not for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx2a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [27_menewx2_perspop1]. The respondents gender, age group, and region is piped into the question text.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Match: “This article is widely read among [gender] in the [age group] living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.”	2239	50.9%	0.5092108
2	No match: “This article is not widely read among [gender] in the [age group] living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.”	2158	49.1%	0.4907892
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_sted1

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects place for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx2a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx2_sted2]. If the first element was selected the respondent was shown the name of its home municipality. If the second alternative was selected the respondent was shown a randomly selected municipality from a county different fro the respondents home county. The municipalities Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger, Trondheim, and Tromsø are not selected. Municipalities from Viken would not be selected if the respondent has Oslo as their home municipality.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Close	2186	49.7%	0.4971572
2	Distant	2211	50.3%	0.5028428
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_sted2

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects place for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx2a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value from [r27_menewx2_sted1]. If the first element was selected the respondent was shown the name of its home municipality. If the second alternative was selected the respondent was shown a randomly selected municipality from a county different fro the respondents home county. The municipalities Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger, Trondheim, and Tromsø are not selected. Municipalities from Viken would not be selected if the respondent has Oslo as their home municipality.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Close	2211	50.3%	0.5028428
2	Distant	2186	49.7%	0.4971572
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_lang1

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects length for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx2a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value of [r27_menewx_lang2].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	2 minutes	2190	49.8%	0.4980669
2	15 minutes	2207	50.2%	0.5019331
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_lang2

Variable label:	Experiment. Randomly selects length for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx2a]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value of [r27_menewx_lang1].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	2 minutes	2207	50.2%	0.5019331
2	15 minutes	2190	49.8%	0.4980669
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_rangering1

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects element for textpiping in the first column in [r27_menewx2a]. Selection conditional on answers given in [r27_meira]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value of [27_menewx_rangering2]. Values selected based on the respondents ranking of topics in [r27_meira]. If the topic ‘climate change’ is ranked higher than ‘abortion legislation’ in [r27_meira], the article on meat prices is suggested. If the topic ‘abortion legislation’ is ranked higher than ‘climate change’, the article on abortion legislation is selected. If [r27_meira] is unanswered, the initial random sorting of [r27_meira] is selected.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	You have previously indicated that you are interested in knowing more about the subject of the article. The article has therefore been suggested to you, based on your ranking of the topic.	2193	49.9%	0.4987491
2	You have previously indicated that you are less interested in knowing more about the subject of the article. The article has therefore not been suggested to you, based on your ranking of the topic.	2204	50.1%	0.5012509
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2_rangering2

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects element for textpiping in the second column in [r27_menewx2a]. Selection conditional on answers given in [r27_meira]
Technical description:	[Randomized if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Opposite value of [27_menewx_rangering1]. Values selected based on the respondents ranking of topics in [r27_meira]. If the topic ‘climate change’ is ranked higher than ‘abortion legislation’ in [r27_meira], the article on meat prices is suggested. If the topic ‘abortion legislation’ is ranked higher than ‘climate change’, the article on abortion legislation is selected. If [r27_meira] is unanswered, the initial random sorting of [r27_meira] is selected.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4397] [Invalid:5600] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	You have previously indicated that you are interested in knowing more about the subject of the article. The article has therefore been suggested to you, based on your ranking of the topic.	2204	50.1%	0.5012509
2	You have previously indicated that you are less interested in knowing more about the subject of the article. The article has therefore not been suggested to you, based on your ranking of the topic.	2193	49.9%	0.4987491
Sysmiss		5600		NA

r27_menewx2a

Variable label:	Experiment. Recommendation algorithms effect on news choices.
Literal question:	The table below shows the headline of two genuine news stories which have been published in Norwegian online newspapers (e.g. NRK, TV2, VG, and Nettavisen). Please read all the information in the table and consider the question below. Story 1 [r27_menewx2a_overskrift1] [r27_menewx2a_tid1] [r27_menewx2a_populaer1] [r27_menewx2a_perspop1] [r27_menewx2a_sted1] [r27_menewx2a_lang1] [r27_menewx2a_rangering1] Story 2 [r27_menewx2a_overskrift2] [r27_menewx2a_tid2] [r27_menewx2a_populaer2] [r27_menewx2a_perspop2] [r27_menewx2a_sted2] [r27_menewx2a_lang2] [r27_menewx2a_rangering2] Which of these two stories are you most likely to click on to read more?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Contents of the table was listed in the order set in [r27_menewx1_roworder]. Shown on the same page as [r27_menewx2b], and [r27_menewx2c].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	News story 1	2261	51.3%	0.51281470
2	News story 2	2031	46.1%	0.46064867
97	Not answered	117	2.7%	0.02653663
98	Not asked	5588		NA

r27_menewx2b

Variable label:	How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 1 in order to read more?
Literal question:	On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 1 in order to read more?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Shown on the same page as [r27_menewx2a], and [r27_menewx2c].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Not at all likely	268	6.1%	0.06078476
2	2 - Not very likely	859	19.5%	0.19482876
3	3 - Somewhat likely	1465	33.2%	0.33227489
4	4 - Likely	1313	29.8%	0.29779995
5	5 - Highly likely	446	10.1%	0.10115672
97	Not answered	58	1.3%	0.01315491
98	Not asked	5588		NA

r27_menewx2c

Variable label:	How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 2 in order to read more?
Literal question:	On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 2 in order to read more?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3,4) & (r27_menewx_kjottpris_enig is answered & r27_menewx_abort_enig is answered) and if the respondent is registered with valid information on home municipality.] [Shown on the same page as [r27_menewx2a], and [r27_menewx2b].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Not at all likely	313	7.1%	0.07099115
2	2 - Not very likely	928	21.0%	0.21047857
3	3 - Somewhat likely	1458	33.1%	0.33068723
4	4 - Likely	1238	28.1%	0.28078929
5	5 - Highly likely	416	9.4%	0.09435246
97	Not answered	56	1.3%	0.01270129
98	Not asked	5588		NA

r27_powcr_1

Variable label:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?: Prolonged power outage
Pre-question text:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?
Literal question:	Prolonged power outage
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very worried	104	4.4%	0.04434968
2	Worried	386	16.5%	0.16460554
3	Somewhat worried	635	27.1%	0.27078891
4	Not very worried	987	42.1%	0.42089552
5	Not at all worried	199	8.5%	0.08486141
97	Not answered	34	1.4%	0.01449893
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_powcr_2

Variable label:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?: Disruptions in the supply of food and drink
Pre-question text:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?
Literal question:	Disruptions in the supply of food and drink
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very worried	116	4.9%	0.04946695
2	Worried	394	16.8%	0.16801706
3	Somewhat worried	745	31.8%	0.31769723
4	Not very worried	865	36.9%	0.36886994
5	Not at all worried	189	8.1%	0.08059701
97	Not answered	36	1.5%	0.01535181
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_powcr_3

Variable label:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?: Disruptions in the supply of medicines
Pre-question text:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?
Literal question:	Disruptions in the supply of medicines
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very worried	227	9.7%	0.09680171
2	Worried	577	24.6%	0.24605544
3	Somewhat worried	767	32.7%	0.32707889
4	Not very worried	608	25.9%	0.25927505
5	Not at all worried	130	5.5%	0.05543710
97	Not answered	36	1.5%	0.01535181
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_powcr_4

Variable label:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?: Prolonged disruption of the Internet
Pre-question text:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?
Literal question:	Prolonged disruption of the Internet
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very worried	96	4.1%	0.04093817
2	Worried	354	15.1%	0.15095949
3	Somewhat worried	699	29.8%	0.29808102
4	Not very worried	910	38.8%	0.38805970
5	Not at all worried	252	10.7%	0.10746269
97	Not answered	34	1.4%	0.01449893
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_powcr_5

Variable label:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?: Pandemic
Pre-question text:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?
Literal question:	Pandemic
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very worried	114	4.9%	0.04861407
2	Worried	396	16.9%	0.16886994
3	Somewhat worried	810	34.5%	0.34541578
4	Not very worried	844	36.0%	0.35991471
5	Not at all worried	141	6.0%	0.06012793
97	Not answered	40	1.7%	0.01705757
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_powcr_6

Variable label:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?: Spreading information for the purpose of destabilising democracy
Pre-question text:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?
Literal question:	Spreading information for the purpose of destabilising democracy
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very worried	322	13.7%	0.13731343
2	Worried	703	30.0%	0.29978678
3	Somewhat worried	672	28.7%	0.28656716
4	Not very worried	485	20.7%	0.20682303
5	Not at all worried	128	5.5%	0.05458422
97	Not answered	35	1.5%	0.01492537
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_powcr_7

Variable label:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?: Natural disaster
Pre-question text:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?
Literal question:	Natural disaster
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very worried	86	3.7%	0.03667377
2	Worried	362	15.4%	0.15437100
3	Somewhat worried	681	29.0%	0.29040512
4	Not very worried	956	40.8%	0.40767591
5	Not at all worried	224	9.6%	0.09552239
97	Not answered	36	1.5%	0.01535181
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_powcr_8

Variable label:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?: Terrorist attack
Pre-question text:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?
Literal question:	Terrorist attack
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very worried	130	5.5%	0.05543710
2	Worried	435	18.6%	0.18550107
3	Somewhat worried	793	33.8%	0.33816631
4	Not very worried	815	34.8%	0.34754797
5	Not at all worried	136	5.8%	0.05799574
97	Not answered	36	1.5%	0.01535181
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_powcr_9

Variable label:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?: War
Pre-question text:	How worried are you about the following happening in Norway?
Literal question:	War
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very worried	155	6.6%	0.06609808
2	Worried	398	17.0%	0.16972281
3	Somewhat worried	710	30.3%	0.30277186
4	Not very worried	859	36.6%	0.36631130
5	Not at all worried	188	8.0%	0.08017058
97	Not answered	35	1.5%	0.01492537
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpc

Variable label:	To what extent do you have confidence in the civil preparedness of the public authorities?
Literal question:	You will be asked some questions about civil preparedness. Civil preparedness refers to non-military activities intended to protect the Norwegian population before and during crises and ultimately war. This includes the activities of various public and private parties which are designed to ensure the resilience of society, maintain functions (such as access to electricity, the Internet, food and medicines) and strengthen the national defences. To what extent do you have confidence in the civil preparedness of the public authorities?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great extent	49	2.1%	0.02089552
2	To a great extent	668	28.5%	0.28486141
3	To some extent	1128	48.1%	0.48102345
4	To a small extent	395	16.8%	0.16844350
5	Not at all	66	2.8%	0.02814499
97	Not answered	39	1.7%	0.01663113
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpr_1

Variable label:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?: Individuals
Pre-question text:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?
Literal question:	Individuals
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Huge responsibility	169	7.2%	0.07206823
2	Considerable responsibility	785	33.5%	0.33475480
3	Some responsibility	1095	46.7%	0.46695096
4	Not much responsibility	220	9.4%	0.09381663
5	No responsibility at all	28	1.2%	0.01194030
97	Not answered	48	2.0%	0.02046908
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpr_2

Variable label:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?: Societies and organisations
Pre-question text:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?
Literal question:	Societies and organisations
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Huge responsibility	80	3.4%	0.03411514
2	Considerable responsibility	557	23.8%	0.23752665
3	Some responsibility	1241	52.9%	0.52921109
4	Not much responsibility	362	15.4%	0.15437100
5	No responsibility at all	55	2.3%	0.02345416
97	Not answered	50	2.1%	0.02132196
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpr_3

Variable label:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?: Trade and industry
Pre-question text:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?
Literal question:	Trade and industry
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Huge responsibility	185	7.9%	0.07889126
2	Considerable responsibility	981	41.8%	0.41833689
3	Some responsibility	925	39.4%	0.39445629
4	Not much responsibility	171	7.3%	0.07292111
5	No responsibility at all	26	1.1%	0.01108742
97	Not answered	57	2.4%	0.02430704
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpr_4

Variable label:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?: Municipalities
Pre-question text:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?
Literal question:	Municipalities
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Huge responsibility	1044	44.5%	0.445202559
2	Considerable responsibility	1119	47.7%	0.477185501
3	Some responsibility	121	5.2%	0.051599147
4	Not much responsibility	7	0.3%	0.002985075
5	No responsibility at all	5	0.2%	0.002132196
97	Not answered	49	2.1%	0.020895522
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpr_5

Variable label:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?: The state
Pre-question text:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?
Literal question:	The state
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Huge responsibility	1834	78.2%	0.7820895522
2	Considerable responsibility	419	17.9%	0.1786780384
3	Some responsibility	38	1.6%	0.0162046908
4	Not much responsibility	8	0.3%	0.0034115139
5	No responsibility at all	1	0.0%	0.0004264392
97	Not answered	45	1.9%	0.0191897655
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpr_6

Variable label:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?: The EU
Pre-question text:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?
Literal question:	The EU
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Huge responsibility	723	30.8%	0.30831557
2	Considerable responsibility	595	25.4%	0.25373134
3	Some responsibility	472	20.1%	0.20127932
4	Not much responsibility	299	12.8%	0.12750533
5	No responsibility at all	197	8.4%	0.08400853
97	Not answered	59	2.5%	0.02515991
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpr_7

Variable label:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?: NATO
Pre-question text:	How much responsibility do you think the following parties have for ensuring civil preparedness in Norway?
Literal question:	NATO
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Huge responsibility	1162	49.6%	0.49552239
2	Considerable responsibility	550	23.5%	0.23454158
3	Some responsibility	290	12.4%	0.12366738
4	Not much responsibility	173	7.4%	0.07377399
5	No responsibility at all	117	5.0%	0.04989339
97	Not answered	53	2.3%	0.02260128
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpi_1

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: More international cooperation on civil preparedness with: Denmark
Pre-question text:	It has been suggested that Norway should be more involved in international cooperation on civil preparedness. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement that Norway should collaborate more with:
Literal question:	Denmark
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	895	38.2%	0.381663113
2	Agree somewhat	1059	45.2%	0.451599147
3	Neither agree nor disagree	305	13.0%	0.130063966
4	Disagree somewhat	17	0.7%	0.007249467
5	Strongly disagree	5	0.2%	0.002132196
97	Not answered	64	2.7%	0.027292111
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpi_2

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: More international cooperation on civil preparedness with: Finland
Pre-question text:	It has been suggested that Norway should be more involved in international cooperation on civil preparedness. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement that Norway should collaborate more with:
Literal question:	Finland
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	856	36.5%	0.365031983
2	Agree somewhat	1068	45.5%	0.455437100
3	Neither agree nor disagree	333	14.2%	0.142004264
4	Disagree somewhat	20	0.9%	0.008528785
5	Strongly disagree	8	0.3%	0.003411514
97	Not answered	60	2.6%	0.025586354
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpi_3

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: More international cooperation on civil preparedness with: Iceland
Pre-question text:	It has been suggested that Norway should be more involved in international cooperation on civil preparedness. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement that Norway should collaborate more with:
Literal question:	Iceland
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	715	30.5%	0.304904051
2	Agree somewhat	970	41.4%	0.413646055
3	Neither agree nor disagree	529	22.6%	0.225586354
4	Disagree somewhat	50	2.1%	0.021321962
5	Strongly disagree	14	0.6%	0.005970149
97	Not answered	67	2.9%	0.028571429
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpi_4

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: More international cooperation on civil preparedness with: Sweden
Pre-question text:	It has been suggested that Norway should be more involved in international cooperation on civil preparedness. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement that Norway should collaborate more with:
Literal question:	Sweden
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	974	41.5%	0.415351812
2	Agree somewhat	1075	45.8%	0.458422175
3	Neither agree nor disagree	220	9.4%	0.093816631
4	Disagree somewhat	12	0.5%	0.005117271
5	Strongly disagree	11	0.5%	0.004690832
97	Not answered	53	2.3%	0.022601279
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpi_5

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: More international cooperation on civil preparedness with: Nordic cooperation bodies
Pre-question text:	It has been suggested that Norway should be more involved in international cooperation on civil preparedness. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement that Norway should collaborate more with:
Literal question:	Nordic cooperation bodies
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	924	39.4%	0.394029851
2	Agree somewhat	1061	45.2%	0.452452026
3	Neither agree nor disagree	276	11.8%	0.117697228
4	Disagree somewhat	15	0.6%	0.006396588
5	Strongly disagree	5	0.2%	0.002132196
97	Not answered	64	2.7%	0.027292111
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpi_6

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: More international cooperation on civil preparedness with: The EU
Pre-question text:	It has been suggested that Norway should be more involved in international cooperation on civil preparedness. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement that Norway should collaborate more with:
Literal question:	The EU
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	668	28.5%	0.28486141
2	Agree somewhat	947	40.4%	0.40383795
3	Neither agree nor disagree	473	20.2%	0.20170576
4	Disagree somewhat	112	4.8%	0.04776119
5	Strongly disagree	88	3.8%	0.03752665
97	Not answered	57	2.4%	0.02430704
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pocpi_7

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: More international cooperation on civil preparedness with: NATO
Pre-question text:	It has been suggested that Norway should be more involved in international cooperation on civil preparedness. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement that Norway should collaborate more with:
Literal question:	NATO
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 5)] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	1043	44.5%	0.44477612
2	Agree somewhat	803	34.2%	0.34243070
3	Neither agree nor disagree	324	13.8%	0.13816631
4	Disagree somewhat	68	2.9%	0.02899787
5	Strongly disagree	50	2.1%	0.02132196
97	Not answered	57	2.4%	0.02430704
98	Not asked	7652		NA

r27_pceco

Variable label:	Assessment of: Your own financial situation today
Literal question:	How would you assess your own financial situation today?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	1236	12.4%	0.123637091
2	Good	4881	48.8%	0.488246474
3	Quite good	1671	16.7%	0.167150145
4	Neither good nor bad	1179	11.8%	0.117935381
5	Quite bad	575	5.8%	0.057517255
6	Bad	205	2.1%	0.020506152
7	Very bad	76	0.8%	0.007602281
97	Not answered	174	1.7%	0.017405222

r27_pcecy

Variable label:	Assessment of: Your own financial situation in a year
Literal question:	How would you assess your own financial situation in a year?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
5	Much better than today	27	0.9%	0.008667737
4	Better than today	414	13.3%	0.132905297
3	Neither worse nor better than today	2144	68.8%	0.688282504
2	Worse than today	471	15.1%	0.151203852
1	Much worse than today	18	0.6%	0.005778491
97	Not answered	41	1.3%	0.013162119
98	Not asked	6882		NA

r27_bgurb

Variable label:	Which description best fits the area you live in?
Literal question:	Which description best fits the area you live in?
Post-question:	We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 3, 4, 5)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A city	1646	23.9%	0.23917466
2	A suburb or the outskirts of a city	1354	19.7%	0.19674513
3	A small or medium sized town	1945	28.3%	0.28262133
4	A village	1067	15.5%	0.15504214
5	A sparsely inhabited area	699	10.2%	0.10156931
97	Not answered	171	2.5%	0.02484743
98	Not asked	3115		NA

r27_bghea

Variable label:	In general, how would you say your health is?
Literal question:	In general, how would you say your health is?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2 \| r27_panelgroup = 3,4,5 & r27_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Excellent	426	9.5%	0.09511052
2	Very good	1339	29.9%	0.29895066
3	Good	1765	39.4%	0.39406117
4	Somewhat good	679	15.2%	0.15159634
5	Poor	195	4.4%	0.04353650
97	Not answered	75	1.7%	0.01674481
98	Not asked	5518		NA

r27_bgciv

Variable label:	Marital status
Literal question:	What is your marital status? Select the most appropriate
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Single	357	11.5%	0.114606742
2	Non-domestic relationship	143	4.6%	0.045906902
3	Cohabitant	435	14.0%	0.139646870
4	Married/legally registered partner	1810	58.1%	0.581059390
5	Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner	179	5.7%	0.057463884
6	Widow/widower	139	4.5%	0.044622793
7	Other:	7	0.2%	0.002247191
97	Not answered	45	1.4%	0.014446228
98	Not asked	6882		NA

r27_bgciv_7_other

Variable label:	Other: Marital status
Pre-question text:	What is your marital status? Select the most appropriate
Literal question:	Other:
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2)] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_bgcha_0

Variable label:	Number of children: I do not have any children
Pre-question text:	If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children, foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the children?
Literal question:	I do not have any children
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_1 - r27_bgcha_7], and [r27_bgchao].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	2060	20.6%	0.20606182
0	Not selected	7771	77.7%	0.77733320
97	Not answered	166	1.7%	0.01660498

r27_bgcha_1

Variable label:	Number of children: 0-5 years old
Pre-question text:	If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children, foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the children?
Literal question:	0-5 years old
Post-question:	If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7], and [r27_bgchao].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:668] [Invalid:9329] [Range:0-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	23	3.4%	0.034431138
1	1	448	67.1%	0.670658683
2	2	175	26.2%	0.261976048
3	3	16	2.4%	0.023952096
4	4	5	0.7%	0.007485030
5	5	1	0.1%	0.001497006
Sysmiss		9329		NA

r27_bgcha_2

Variable label:	Number of children: 6-10 years old
Pre-question text:	If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children, foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the children?
Literal question:	6-10 years old
Post-question:	If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7], and [r27_bgchao].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:753] [Invalid:9244] [Range:0-10]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	24	3.2%	0.031872510
1	1	547	72.6%	0.726427623
2	2	162	21.5%	0.215139442
3	3	17	2.3%	0.022576361
6	6	1	0.1%	0.001328021
10	10	2	0.3%	0.002656042
Sysmiss		9244		NA

r27_bgcha_3

Variable label:	Number of children: 11-15 years old
Pre-question text:	If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children, foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the children?
Literal question:	11-15 years old
Post-question:	If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7], and [r27_bgchao].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:950] [Invalid:9047] [Range:0-14]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	21	2.2%	0.022105263
1	1	685	72.1%	0.721052632
2	2	219	23.1%	0.230526316
3	3	17	1.8%	0.017894737
4	4	4	0.4%	0.004210526
5	5	2	0.2%	0.002105263
12	12	1	0.1%	0.001052632
14	14	1	0.1%	0.001052632
Sysmiss		9047		NA

r27_bgcha_4

Variable label:	Number of children: 16-20 years old
Pre-question text:	If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children, foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the children?
Literal question:	16-20 years old
Post-question:	If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7], and [r27_bgchao].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1108] [Invalid:8889] [Range:0-10]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	24	2.2%	0.0216606498
1	1	824	74.4%	0.7436823105
2	2	241	21.8%	0.2175090253
3	3	14	1.3%	0.0126353791
4	4	4	0.4%	0.0036101083
10	10	1	0.1%	0.0009025271
Sysmiss		8889		NA

r27_bgcha_5

Variable label:	Number of children: 21-30 years old
Pre-question text:	If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children, foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the children?
Literal question:	21-30 years old
Post-question:	If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7], and [r27_bgchao].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2468] [Invalid:7529] [Range:0-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	21	0.9%	0.0085089141
1	1	1266	51.3%	0.5129659643
2	2	902	36.5%	0.3654781199
3	3	225	9.1%	0.0911669368
4	4	44	1.8%	0.0178282010
5	5	8	0.3%	0.0032414911
6	6	1	0.0%	0.0004051864
8	8	1	0.0%	0.0004051864
Sysmiss		7529		NA

r27_bgcha_6

Variable label:	Number of children: 31-50 years old
Pre-question text:	If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children, foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the children?
Literal question:	31-50 years old
Post-question:	If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7], and [r27_bgchao].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4134] [Invalid:5863] [Range:0-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	15	0.4%	0.0036284470
1	1	1260	30.5%	0.3047895501
2	2	1838	44.5%	0.4446057088
3	3	823	19.9%	0.1990807934
4	4	159	3.8%	0.0384615385
5	5	28	0.7%	0.0067731011
6	6	7	0.2%	0.0016932753
7	7	4	0.1%	0.0009675859
Sysmiss		5863		NA

r27_bgcha_7

Variable label:	Number of children: 51 years old and above
Pre-question text:	If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children, foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the children?
Literal question:	51 years old and above
Post-question:	If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_6], and [r27_bgchao].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:943] [Invalid:9054] [Range:0-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	23	2.4%	0.024390244
1	1	415	44.0%	0.440084836
2	2	364	38.6%	0.386002121
3	3	115	12.2%	0.121951220
4	4	22	2.3%	0.023329799
5	5	2	0.2%	0.002120891
6	6	2	0.2%	0.002120891
Sysmiss		9054		NA

r27_bgchao

Variable label:	Open: If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children, foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the children?: Any comments:
Pre-question text:	If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children, foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the children?
Literal question:	Any comments:
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7].] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_bgday

Variable label:	Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last seven days?
Literal question:	Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last seven days?
Post-question:	Select one alternative.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave)	4410	44.1%	0.441132340
2	In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more	284	2.8%	0.028408523
3	In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week	278	2.8%	0.027808343
4	Self-employed	387	3.9%	0.038711613
5	In education (not paid by an employer)	172	1.7%	0.017205162
6	Unemployed and actively seeking a job	58	0.6%	0.005801741
7	Unemployed and not actively seeking a job	30	0.3%	0.003000900
8	Permanently ill or disabled	574	5.7%	0.057417225
9	Retired	3288	32.9%	0.328898670
10	In military service	2	0.0%	0.000200060
11	Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons	48	0.5%	0.004801440
12	Other:	276	2.8%	0.027608282
97	Not answered	190	1.9%	0.019005702

r27_bgday_12_other

Variable label:	Open: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last seven days?: Other
Pre-question text:	Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last seven days?
Literal question:	Other:
Post-question:	Select one alternative.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_bgsct

Variable label:	Which type of business do you work in?
Literal question:	Which type of business do you work in?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	State, county or municipal administration	724	14.6%	0.145615447
2	Other public sector (e.g. school and health services)	1418	28.5%	0.285197104
3	Publicly owned enterprise	325	6.5%	0.065366050
4	Private business	2347	47.2%	0.472043443
5	Self-employed	24	0.5%	0.004827031
6	Other:	125	2.5%	0.025140788
97	Not answered	9	0.2%	0.001810137
98	Not asked	5025		NA

r27_bgsct_6_other

Variable label:	Open: Which type of business do you work in?: Other
Pre-question text:	Which type of business do you work in?
Literal question:	Other:
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3)] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_bgscp_pipe

Variable label:	Experiment. Selects an alement for textpiping in [r27_bgscp].
Technical description:	[If [r27_bgday] = 5 the first element is selected. If [r27_bgday] = 6 \|7 the second element is selected. If [r27_bgday] = 8 the third element is selected. If [r27_bgday] = 9 the fourth element is selected. If [r27_bgday] = 11 the fifth element is selected.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4179] [Invalid:5818] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	a student	173	4.1%	0.04139746
2	unemployed	89	2.1%	0.02129696
3	permanently ill or disabled	579	13.9%	0.13854989
4	retired	3289	78.7%	0.78703039
5	a stay-at-home parent or caregiver	49	1.2%	0.01172529
Sysmiss		5818		NA

r27_bgscp

Variable label:	What type of business did you work for before you became [r27_bgscp_pipe]?
Literal question:	What type of business did you work for before you became [r27_bgscp_pipe]?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 5,6,7,8,9,11)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	State, county or municipal administration	454	10.9%	0.108872902
2	Other public sector (e.g. school and health services)	1315	31.5%	0.315347722
3	Publicly owned enterprise	299	7.2%	0.071702638
4	Private business	1524	36.5%	0.365467626
5	Self-employed	292	7.0%	0.070023981
6	Other:	171	4.1%	0.041007194
7	Have not previously been working	92	2.2%	0.022062350
97	Not answered	23	0.6%	0.005515588
98	Not asked	5827		NA

r27_bgscp_6_other

Variable label:	Open: What type of business did you work for before you became [r27_bgscp_pipe]?: Other
Pre-question text:	What type of business did you work for before you became [r27_bgscp_pipe]?
Literal question:	Other:
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 5,6,7,8,9,11)] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_bgind_1

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Public central administration
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Public central administration
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	783	8.3%	0.0831739962
0	Not selected	8627	91.6%	0.9164011047
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_2

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Kindergarten/school/teaching
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Kindergarten/school/teaching
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	1497	15.9%	0.1590184831
0	Not selected	7913	84.1%	0.8405566178
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_3

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Health services
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Health services
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	1198	12.7%	0.1272572764
0	Not selected	8212	87.2%	0.8723178245
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_4

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Social services/child protection
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Social services/child protection
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	219	2.3%	0.0232632250
0	Not selected	9191	97.6%	0.9763118759
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_5

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Nursing and care services
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Nursing and care services
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	471	5.0%	0.0500318674
0	Not selected	8939	95.0%	0.9495432335
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_6

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Defence/police/judicial system/security
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Defence/police/judicial system/security
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	316	3.4%	0.0335670278
0	Not selected	9094	96.6%	0.9660080731
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_7

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Agriculture/forestry/fishing
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Agriculture/forestry/fishing
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	255	2.7%	0.0270873168
0	Not selected	9155	97.2%	0.9724877842
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_8

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Industry/technology
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Industry/technology
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	760	8.1%	0.0807308264
0	Not selected	8650	91.9%	0.9188442745
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_9

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Building/construction
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Building/construction
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	692	7.4%	0.0735075420
0	Not selected	8718	92.6%	0.9260675590
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_10

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Retailing/shop
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Retailing/shop
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	510	5.4%	0.0541746335
0	Not selected	8900	94.5%	0.9454004674
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_11

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Transport/communications
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Transport/communications
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	478	5.1%	0.0507754408
0	Not selected	8932	94.9%	0.9487996601
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_12

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Culture/sport/organisations
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Culture/sport/organisations
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	359	3.8%	0.0381346930
0	Not selected	9051	96.1%	0.9614404079
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_13

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Media/advertising/PR/information
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Media/advertising/PR/information
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	277	2.9%	0.0294242617
0	Not selected	9133	97.0%	0.9701508392
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_14

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Research/analysis
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Research/analysis
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	450	4.8%	0.0478011472
0	Not selected	8960	95.2%	0.9517739537
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_15

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Travel/hotels
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Travel/hotels
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	132	1.4%	0.0140216699
0	Not selected	9278	98.6%	0.9855534311
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_16

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Restaurants/catering
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Restaurants/catering
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	104	1.1%	0.0110473762
0	Not selected	9306	98.9%	0.9885277247
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_17

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Telecommunications/IT
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Telecommunications/IT
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	564	6.0%	0.0599107712
0	Not selected	8846	94.0%	0.9396643297
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_18

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Banking/insurance/finance
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Banking/insurance/finance
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	393	4.2%	0.0417463352
0	Not selected	9017	95.8%	0.9578287657
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_19

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Commercial services
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Commercial services
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	547	5.8%	0.0581049501
0	Not selected	8863	94.1%	0.9414701508
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_20

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Oil/gas
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Oil/gas
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	582	6.2%	0.0618228171
0	Not selected	8828	93.8%	0.9377522838
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_21

Variable label:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Other
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Other
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘do’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Selected	794	8.4%	0.0843424687
0	Not selected	8616	91.5%	0.9152326322
97	Not answered	4	0.0%	0.0004248991
98	Not asked	583		NA

r27_bgind_21_other

Variable label:	Open: What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?: Other
Pre-question text:	What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
Literal question:	Other
Post-question:	It is possible to select up to three answers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,4 \| r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [If [r27_bgscp] = 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 the respondent was exposed to the past tense of ‘work’, other respondents was exposed to the present tense.] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_hewor

Variable label:	Do you work or have you previously worked as a healthcare professional?
Literal question:	Do you work or have you previously worked as a healthcare professional?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1 & r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes, as:	161	19.0%	0.189858491
2	No	683	80.5%	0.805424528
97	Not answered	4	0.5%	0.004716981
98	Not asked	9149		NA

r27_hewor_1_other

Variable label:	Open: Do you work or have you previously worked as a healthcare professional?: Other
Pre-question text:	Do you work or have you previously worked as a healthcare professional?
Literal question:	Other:
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1 & r27_bgscp = 1,2,3,4,5,6)] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_bgoil

Variable label:	[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely associated with it?
Literal question:	[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely associated with it?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1, 2 & r27_bgday = 1, 2, 3, 4 & r27_bgind[20] != 1)] [If [r27_bgday] = 9 the third alternative was hidden] [If [r27_bgday] = 9 the question text was in past tense, for other respondents the question text was in present tense.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes, I [work/worked] in the oil or gas industry	3	0.1%	0.001234568
2	Yes, my job [is/was] closely associated with the oil or gas industry	67	2.8%	0.027572016
3	No, but previously I have worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely associated with it	60	2.5%	0.024691358
4	No	2286	94.1%	0.940740741
97	Not answered	14	0.6%	0.005761317
98	Not asked	7567		NA

r27_bgoily

Variable label:	When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry?
Literal question:	When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry (or your first job closely associated with the oil and gas industry)? Enter the approximate year as best you can remember.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgoil = 1, 2, 3 \| r27_bgind[20] = 1) & (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,9 & r27_panelgroup = 1,2)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_bgoilyo].] [Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_bgoily_decade

Variable label:	Recoded version of [r27_bgoily].
Technical description:	Recoded version of [r27_bgoily].
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:302] [Invalid:9695] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1960 - 1969	7	2.3%	0.02317881
2	1970 - 1979	49	16.2%	0.16225166
3	1980 - 1989	81	26.8%	0.26821192
4	1990 - 1999	65	21.5%	0.21523179
5	2000 - 2009	58	19.2%	0.19205298
6	2010 - 2019	30	9.9%	0.09933775
7	2020 or later	12	4.0%	0.03973510
Sysmiss		9695		NA

r27_bgoilyo

Variable label:	Open: If you have any additional comments, please enter them here:
Pre-question text:	When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry (or your first job closely associated with the oil and gas industry)? Enter the approximate year as best you can remember.
Literal question:	If you have any additional comments, please enter them here:
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_bgoil = 1, 2, 3 \| r27_bgind[20] = 1) & (r27_bgday = 1,2,3,9 & r27_panelgroup = 1,2)] [Shown on the same page as [r27_bgoily].] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_bgedu

Variable label:	Highest completed education
Literal question:	What is the highest level of completed education?
Post-question:	If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No completed education	24	0.2%	0.002400720
2	Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7- year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school)	380	3.8%	0.038011403
3	Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School)	847	8.5%	0.084725418
4	Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam )	1101	11.0%	0.110133040
5	Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical college)	862	8.6%	0.086225868
6	University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ years)	856	8.6%	0.085625688
7	College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.)	2045	20.5%	0.204561368
8	University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.)	714	7.1%	0.071421426
9	College-5-6 year education (Master, major)	757	7.6%	0.075722717
10	University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education (e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics))	1812	18.1%	0.181254376
11	Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.)	313	3.1%	0.031309393
12	None of the above (please enter):	78	0.8%	0.007802341
97	Not answered	208	2.1%	0.020806242

r27_bgedu_12_other

Variable label:	Open: Highest completed education: None of the above
Pre-question text:	What is the highest level of completed education?
Literal question:	None of the above
Post-question:	If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27_pcgro

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion: Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_panelgroup = 1,2) \| (r27_group = 3)] [Shown to respondents at different points in the survey dependent on [r27_group] and [r27_panelgroup]. If [r27_group] = 3 the respondent was exposed to it right ahead of [r27_cewip]. If [r27_panelgroup] = 1 \| 2 & [r27_group] != 3 the respondent was exposed to it right ahead of [r27_pcoil].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	208	4.6%	0.046397502
2	Agree	531	11.8%	0.118447468
3	Agree somewhat	1018	22.7%	0.227080080
4	Neither agree nor disagree	490	10.9%	0.109301807
5	Disagree somewhat	940	21.0%	0.209681017
6	Disagree	821	18.3%	0.183136293
7	Strongly disagree	442	9.9%	0.098594691
97	Not answered	33	0.7%	0.007361142
98	Not asked	5514		NA

r27_cewip_1

Variable label:	Agree/disagree:
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements
Literal question:	More onshore wind power should be developed in Norway.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1, 2, 3, 4)] [Shown to respondents at different points in the survey dependent on [r27_group]. If [r27_group] = 3 the respondent was exposed to it right ahead of [r27_pccoo] if [r27_panelgroup] = 1 \| 2; [r27_pcldp] if [r27_panelgroup] = 3 \| 4; or [r27_powcr] if [r27_panelgroup] = 5.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	806	10.1%	0.1008761
2	Agree	1417	17.7%	0.1773467
3	Agree somewhat	1703	21.3%	0.2131414
4	Neither agree nor disagree	817	10.2%	0.1022528
5	Disagree somewhat	904	11.3%	0.1131414
6	Disagree	997	12.5%	0.1247810
7	Strongly disagree	1261	15.8%	0.1578223
97	Not answered	85	1.1%	0.0106383
98	Not asked	2007		NA

r27_cewip_2

Variable label:	Agree/disagree:
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements
Literal question:	More offshore wind power should be developed in Norway.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r27_group = 1, 2, 3, 4)] [Shown to respondents at different points in the survey dependent on [r27_group]. If [r27_group] = 3 the respondent was exposed to it right ahead of [r27_pccoo] if [r27_panelgroup] = 1 \| 2; [r27_pcldp] if [r27_panelgroup] = 3 \| 4; or [r27_powcr] if [r27_panelgroup] = 5.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	1496	18.7%	0.18723404
2	Agree	2334	29.2%	0.29211514
3	Agree somewhat	1529	19.1%	0.19136421
4	Neither agree nor disagree	748	9.4%	0.09361702
5	Disagree somewhat	520	6.5%	0.06508135
6	Disagree	526	6.6%	0.06583229
7	Strongly disagree	746	9.3%	0.09336671
97	Not answered	91	1.1%	0.01138924
98	Not asked	2007		NA

r27_pcecs

Variable label:	Perception of current economic situation
Literal question:	How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? Do you think it is:
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Shown to respondents at different points in the survey dependent on [r27_group]. If [r27_group] = 2 the respondent was exposed to it right ahead of [r27_pcecr]. If [r27_group] = 1 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 the respondent was exposed to it right after [r27_pcsag].]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	842	8.4%	0.08422527
2	Good	3327	33.3%	0.33279984
3	Quite good	1823	18.2%	0.18235471
4	Neither good nor bad	946	9.5%	0.09462839
5	Quite bad	1881	18.8%	0.18815645
6	Bad	880	8.8%	0.08802641
7	Very bad	265	2.7%	0.02650795
97	Not answered	33	0.3%	0.00330099
98	Not asked	0		NA

r27_avslutt

Variable label:	Closing comments.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:9997] [Range:-]

r27P_moved

Variable label:

Change in home municipality

Literal question:

Respondents were asked what county and municipality they live in.

Respondents who moved abroad are assigned the value 1, and exposed to a follow-up question on what their registered address in Norway is.

Respondents who moved to Svalbard/Jan Mayen are assigned the value 1, and exposed to a follow-up question on what their mainland address is.

Technical attributes:

[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The respondent has changed home municipality	661	6.6%	0.06611984
0	The respondent has not changed home municipality	9336	93.4%	0.93388016

r27P1

Variable label:	Gender
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Male	5054	50.6%	0.5055517
2	Female	4943	49.4%	0.4944483

r27P2

Variable label:	Region
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Oslo	1617	16.2%	0.16174852
2	Østlandet	3589	35.9%	0.35900770
3	Sørlandet	483	4.8%	0.04831449
4	Vestlandet	2778	27.8%	0.27788337
5	Trøndelag	818	8.2%	0.08182455
6	Nord-Norge	712	7.1%	0.07122137

r27P3

Variable label:	County
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:3-54]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
3	Oslo	1617	16.2%	0.16174852
11	Rogaland	977	9.8%	0.09772932
15	Møre og Romsdal	398	4.0%	0.03981194
18	Nordland	355	3.6%	0.03551065
30	Viken	2304	23.0%	0.23046914
34	Innlandet	530	5.3%	0.05301590
38	Vestfold og Telemark	755	7.6%	0.07552266
42	Agder	483	4.8%	0.04831449
46	Vestland	1403	14.0%	0.14034210
50	Trøndelag	818	8.2%	0.08182455
54	Troms og Finnmark	357	3.6%	0.03571071

r27P3_2

Variable label:	Constituencies parliament election 2021
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
3	Østfold	481	4.8%	0.048114434
1	Akershus	1375	13.8%	0.137541262
2	Oslo	1617	16.2%	0.161748525
5	Hedmark	283	2.8%	0.028308493
6	Oppland	247	2.5%	0.024707412
7	Buskerud	448	4.5%	0.044813444
4	Vestfold	503	5.0%	0.050315095
8	Telemark	252	2.5%	0.025207562
10	Aust-Agder	163	1.6%	0.016304891
9	Vest-Agder	320	3.2%	0.032009603
11	Rogaland	977	9.8%	0.097729319
12	Hordaland	1242	12.4%	0.124237271
13	Sogn og Fjordane	161	1.6%	0.016104831
14	Møre og Romsdal	398	4.0%	0.039811944
16	Sør-Trøndelag	656	6.6%	0.065619686
15	Nord-Trøndelag	162	1.6%	0.016204861
17	Nordland	355	3.6%	0.035510653
18	Troms	275	2.8%	0.027508252
19	Finnmark	82	0.8%	0.008202461

r27P4_1

Variable label:	Highest completed education
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No education/elementary school	414	4.1%	0.041412424
2	Upper secondary education	2876	28.8%	0.287686306
3	University/University college	6615	66.2%	0.661698510
97	Not answered	92	0.9%	0.009202761

r27P4_2

Variable label:	Highest completed education
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No completed education	24	0.2%	0.0024007202
2	Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school)	390	3.9%	0.0390117035
3	Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School)	878	8.8%	0.0878263479
4	Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam )	1124	11.2%	0.1124337301
5	Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical college)	874	8.7%	0.0874262279
6	University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ years)	873	8.7%	0.0873261979
7	College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.)	2078	20.8%	0.2078623587
8	University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.)	735	7.4%	0.0735220566
9	College-5-6 year education (Master, major)	773	7.7%	0.0773231970
10	University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education (e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics))	1839	18.4%	0.1839551866
11	Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.)	317	3.2%	0.0317095129
12	None of the above (please enter):	84	0.8%	0.0084025208
97	Not answered	8	0.1%	0.0008002401

r27P5_1

Variable label:	Year of birth
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1939 or earlier	182	1.8%	0.01820546
2	1940-1949	1503	15.0%	0.15034510
3	1950-1959	2537	25.4%	0.25377613
4	1960-1969	2343	23.4%	0.23437031
5	1970-1979	1577	15.8%	0.15774732
6	1980-1989	1086	10.9%	0.10863259
7	1990 or later	769	7.7%	0.07692308

r27P5_2

Variable label:	Year of birth
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1959 or earlier	4222	42.2%	0.42232670
2	1960-1989	5006	50.1%	0.50075023
3	1990 or later	769	7.7%	0.07692308

r27_Weight1_stratapop

Variable label:	Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata constructed with P1, P2, and age
Technical description:	[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation report.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-0]

r27_Weight1

Variable label:	Weight based on variables P1, P2, and age. See documentation report.
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

r27_Weight2_stratapop

Variable label:	Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata constructed with P1, P2, P4_1, and age
Technical description:	[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation report.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9905] [Invalid:92] [Range:0-0]

r27_Weight2

Variable label:	Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1, and age. See documentation report.
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-47]

r27_Weight4

Variable label:	Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1) upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and age.
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]

r27_Weight5

Variable label:	Weight based on variables P1, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1) upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and age. Weight values are capped (x is >= .2 and x <= 5).
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]

Value	Cases	Percentage
0.2730710	1654	16.5%	0.165449635
0.2944762	1529	15.3%	0.152945884
0.5447649	23	0.2%	0.002300690
0.6772924	40	0.4%	0.004001200
0.7057963	1405	14.1%	0.140542163
0.7740056	1764	17.6%	0.176452936
1.0570337	1089	10.9%	0.108932680
1.0784863	20	0.2%	0.002000600
1.1926061	4	0.0%	0.000400120
1.5075556	864	8.6%	0.086425928
1.9438823	168	1.7%	0.016805042
2.1625589	95	1.0%	0.009502851
2.3988589	704	7.0%	0.070421126
2.5516740	485	4.9%	0.048514554
3.7809738	4	0.0%	0.000400120
5.0000000	149	1.5%	0.014904471

r20bk26

Variable label:	What is your highest completed education?
Literal question:	What is your highest completed education?
Post-question:	If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No completed education	11	0.2%	0.001774480
2	Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7- year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school)	231	3.7%	0.037264075
3	Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School)	510	8.2%	0.082271334
4	Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam )	640	10.3%	0.103242458
5	Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical college)	573	9.2%	0.092434264
6	University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ years)	517	8.3%	0.083400548
7	College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.)	1334	21.5%	0.215195999
8	University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.)	463	7.5%	0.074689466
9	College-5-6 year education (Master, major)	459	7.4%	0.074044201
10	University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education (e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics))	1180	19.0%	0.190353283
11	Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.)	184	3.0%	0.029682207
12	None of the above (please enter):	65	1.0%	0.010485562
97	Not answered	32	0.5%	0.005162123
98	Not asked	3798		NA

r22bk26_kodet

Variable label:	What is your highest completed education? [coded]
Literal question:	What is your highest completed education?
Post-question:	If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7] [Added recoded values from _other-variables]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No completed education	1	0.1%	0.0007782101
2	Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7- year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school)	50	3.9%	0.0389105058
3	Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School)	131	10.2%	0.1019455253
4	Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam )	158	12.3%	0.1229571984
5	Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical college)	108	8.4%	0.0840466926
6	University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ years)	114	8.9%	0.0887159533
7	College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.)	266	20.7%	0.2070038911
8	University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.)	89	6.9%	0.0692607004
9	College-5-6 year education (Master, major)	99	7.7%	0.0770428016
10	University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education (e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics))	217	16.9%	0.1688715953
11	Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.)	41	3.2%	0.0319066148
12	None of the above (please enter):	1	0.1%	0.0007782101
97	Not answered	10	0.8%	0.0077821012
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r25_bgedu

Variable label:	Highest completed education
Literal question:	What is the highest level of completed education?
Post-question:	If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Technical description:	[Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No completed education	4	0.3%	0.003308519
2	Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7- year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school)	51	4.2%	0.042183623
3	Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School)	107	8.9%	0.088502895
4	Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam )	151	12.5%	0.124896609
5	Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical college)	115	9.5%	0.095119934
6	University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ years)	89	7.4%	0.073614557
7	College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.)	257	21.3%	0.212572374
8	University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.)	82	6.8%	0.067824648
9	College-5-6 year education (Master, major)	90	7.4%	0.074441687
10	University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education (e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics))	202	16.7%	0.167080232
11	Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.)	41	3.4%	0.033912324
12	None of the above (please enter):	10	0.8%	0.008271299
97	Not answered	10	0.8%	0.008271299
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r17oppvekstfylke

Variable label:	Respondents home county at 15 years of age
Technical description:	[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r17oppvekstkom]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:5215] [Invalid:4782] [Range:-]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
3	Oslo	566	10.9%	0.10853308
11	Rogaland	485	9.3%	0.09300096
15	Møre og Romsdal	311	6.0%	0.05963567
18	Nordland	289	5.5%	0.05541707
30	Viken	1042	20.0%	0.19980825
34	Innlandet	337	6.5%	0.06462128
38	Vestfold og Telemark	392	7.5%	0.07516779
42	Agder	266	5.1%	0.05100671
46	Vestland	816	15.6%	0.15647172
50	Trøndelag	461	8.8%	0.08839885
54	Troms og Finnmark	250	4.8%	0.04793864
Sysmiss		4782		NA

r18oppvekstfylke

Variable label:	Respondents home county at 15 years of age
Technical description:	[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r18oppvekstkom]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:604] [Invalid:9393] [Range:-]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
3	Oslo	59	9.8%	0.09768212
11	Rogaland	57	9.4%	0.09437086
15	Møre og Romsdal	37	6.1%	0.06125828
18	Nordland	38	6.3%	0.06291391
30	Viken	114	18.9%	0.18874172
34	Innlandet	61	10.1%	0.10099338
38	Vestfold og Telemark	49	8.1%	0.08112583
42	Agder	32	5.3%	0.05298013
46	Vestland	86	14.2%	0.14238411
50	Trøndelag	50	8.3%	0.08278146
54	Troms og Finnmark	21	3.5%	0.03476821
Sysmiss		9393		NA

r22oppvekstfylke

Variable label:	Respondents home county at 15 years of age
Technical description:	[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r22oppvekstkom]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:1133] [Invalid:8864] [Range:-]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
3	Oslo	116	10.2%	0.10238305
11	Rogaland	108	9.5%	0.09532215
15	Møre og Romsdal	66	5.8%	0.05825243
18	Nordland	73	6.4%	0.06443071
30	Viken	234	20.7%	0.20653133
34	Innlandet	72	6.4%	0.06354810
38	Vestfold og Telemark	77	6.8%	0.06796117
42	Agder	68	6.0%	0.06001765
46	Vestland	182	16.1%	0.16063548
50	Trøndelag	79	7.0%	0.06972639
54	Troms og Finnmark	58	5.1%	0.05119153
Sysmiss		8864		NA

r25_bgupc

Variable label:	Respondents home county at 15 years of age
Technical description:	[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r25_bgupm]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:1044] [Invalid:8953] [Range:-]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
3	Oslo	86	8.2%	0.08237548
11	Rogaland	100	9.6%	0.09578544
15	Møre og Romsdal	57	5.5%	0.05459770
18	Nordland	69	6.6%	0.06609195
30	Viken	231	22.1%	0.22126437
34	Innlandet	69	6.6%	0.06609195
38	Vestfold og Telemark	85	8.1%	0.08141762
42	Agder	53	5.1%	0.05076628
46	Vestland	149	14.3%	0.14272031
50	Trøndelag	100	9.6%	0.09578544
54	Troms og Finnmark	45	4.3%	0.04310345
Sysmiss		8953		NA

r26_bgciv

Variable label:	Marital status
Literal question:	What is your marital status? Check what fits the best
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Single	551	12.0%	0.119912949
2	Non-domestic relationship	212	4.6%	0.046137106
3	Cohabitant	699	15.2%	0.152121872
4	Married/legally registered partner	2629	57.2%	0.572143634
5	Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner	269	5.9%	0.058541893
6	Widow/widower	197	4.3%	0.042872688
7	Other:	15	0.3%	0.003264418
97	Not answered	23	0.5%	0.005005441
98	Not asked	5402		NA

w01_k28

Variable label:	Citizenship
Literal question:	Citizenship. Are you:
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Norwegian citizen	1158	94.8%	0.94762684
2	Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country	51	4.2%	0.04173486
97	No answer	13	1.1%	0.01063830
98	Not asked	8775		NA

w03_r3k28

Variable label:	Citizenship
Literal question:	Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description:	[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Norwegian citizen	1190	94.1%	0.940711462
2	Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country	63	5.0%	0.049802372
97	No answer	12	0.9%	0.009486166
98	Not asked	8732		NA

r4k28

Variable label:	Nationality
Literal question:	Nationality: Are you:
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A Norwegian citizen	19	90.5%	0.9047619
2	A citizen of another country. Please state which	2	9.5%	0.0952381
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	9976		NA

r5k28

Variable label:	Nationality
Literal question:	Nationality: Are you:
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A Norwegian citizen	6	100.0%	1
2	A citizen of another country. Please state which	0	0.0%	0
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0
98	Not asked	9991		NA

r8k28

Variable label:	Citizenship
Pre-question text:	Citizenship.
Literal question:	Are you:
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Norwegian citizen	1112	94.6%	0.946382979
2	Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country:	53	4.5%	0.045106383
97	No answer	10	0.9%	0.008510638
98	Not asked	8822		NA

r11bk28

Variable label:	Citizenship
Literal question:	Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Norwegian citizen	581	93.6%	0.935587762
2	Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country:	37	6.0%	0.059581320
97	Not answered	3	0.5%	0.004830918
98	Not asked	9376		NA

r14bk28

Variable label:	Citizenship. Are you:
Literal question:	Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description:	[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Norwegian citizen	616	94.6%	0.946236559
2	Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country:	31	4.8%	0.047619048
97	Not answered	4	0.6%	0.006144393
98	Not asked	9346		NA

r16bk28

Variable label:	Your citizenship
Literal question:	Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Norwegian citizen	1678	94.0%	0.94005602
2	Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country:	107	6.0%	0.05994398
97	Not answered	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r18bk28

Variable label:	Citizenship
Literal question:	Citizenship.
Post-question:	Are you:
Technical description:	[Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Norwegian citizen	643	94.1%	0.941434846
2	Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country:	37	5.4%	0.054172767
97	Not answered	3	0.4%	0.004392387
98	Not asked	9314		NA

r22bk28

Variable label:	Citizenship
Pre-question text:	Citizenship.
Literal question:	Are you:
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Norwegian citizen	1214	94.5%	0.944747082
2	Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country:	60	4.7%	0.046692607
97	Not answered	11	0.9%	0.008560311
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r25_bgcit

Variable label:	Citizenship
Literal question:	Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description:	[Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Norwegian citizen	1135	93.9%	0.93879239
2	Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country:	59	4.9%	0.04880066
97	Not answered	15	1.2%	0.01240695
98	Not asked	8788		NA

w01_k29

Variable label:	Parents immigrated to Norway
Literal question:	Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	1111	90.9%	0.909165303
2	I have immigrated to Norway myself	50	4.1%	0.040916530
3	Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway	7	0.6%	0.005728314
4	Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated	23	1.9%	0.018821604
5	Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated	17	1.4%	0.013911620
97	No answer	14	1.1%	0.011456628
98	Not asked	8775		NA

w03_r3k29

Variable label:	Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
Literal question:	Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	1153	91.1%	0.910742496
2	I have immigrated to Norway myself	60	4.7%	0.047393365
3	Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway	6	0.5%	0.004739336
4	Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated	16	1.3%	0.012638231
5	Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated	17	1.3%	0.013428120
97	No answer	14	1.1%	0.011058452
98	Not asked	8731		NA

r4k29

Variable label:	Mother or father immigrated to Norway
Literal question:	Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	20	87.0%	0.86956522
2	I have immigrated to Norway	2	8.7%	0.08695652
3	Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway	0	0.0%	0.00000000
4	My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not	1	4.3%	0.04347826
5	My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	9974		NA

r5k29

Variable label:	Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
Literal question:	Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	6	100.0%	1
2	I have immigrated to Norway	0	0.0%	0
3	Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway	0	0.0%	0
4	My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not	0	0.0%	0
5	My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not	0	0.0%	0
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0
98	Not asked	9991		NA

r11bk29

Variable label:	Immigration background
Literal question:	Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 3 or rekruttert = 4. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	1509	91.5%	0.915100061
2	I myself have immigrated to Norway	79	4.8%	0.047907823
3	Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway	6	0.4%	0.003638569
4	My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated	31	1.9%	0.018799272
5	My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated	18	1.1%	0.010915706
97	Not answered	6	0.4%	0.003638569
98	Not asked	8348		NA

r14bk29

Variable label:	Have you or any of your parents immigrated to Norway.
Literal question:	Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	582	89.4%	0.894009217
2	I myself have immigrated to Norway	38	5.8%	0.058371736
3	Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway	2	0.3%	0.003072197
4	My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated	18	2.8%	0.027649770
5	My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated	7	1.1%	0.010752688
97	Not answered	4	0.6%	0.006144393
98	Not asked	9346		NA

r16bk29

Variable label:	Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Literal question:	Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	1612	90.3%	0.9030812325
2	I myself have immigrated to Norway	112	6.3%	0.0627450980
3	Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway	4	0.2%	0.0022408964
4	My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated	30	1.7%	0.0168067227
5	My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated	26	1.5%	0.0145658263
97	Not answered	1	0.1%	0.0005602241
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r18bk29

Variable label:	Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
Literal question:	Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	627	91.8%	0.918008785
2	I myself have immigrated to Norway	42	6.1%	0.061493411
3	Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway	1	0.1%	0.001464129
4	My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated	7	1.0%	0.010248902
5	My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated	4	0.6%	0.005856515
97	Not answered	2	0.3%	0.002928258
98	Not asked	9314		NA

r22bk29

Variable label:	Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Literal question:	Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	1154	89.8%	0.898054475
2	I myself have immigrated to Norway	81	6.3%	0.063035019
3	Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway	5	0.4%	0.003891051
4	My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated	13	1.0%	0.010116732
5	My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated	21	1.6%	0.016342412
97	Not answered	11	0.9%	0.008560311
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r25_bgimm

Variable label:	Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Literal question:	Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	1060	87.7%	0.876757651
2	I myself have immigrated to Norway	75	6.2%	0.062034739
3	Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway	7	0.6%	0.005789909
4	My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated	27	2.2%	0.022332506
5	My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated	23	1.9%	0.019023987
97	Not answered	17	1.4%	0.014061208
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r26k2_bginc

Variable label:	Gross annual income
Literal question:	What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
Equivalent in others panels:	f3k2_bginc; p9k2_bginc
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2) \| (r26_group = 3,4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Less than 150 000	224	2.5%	0.02545455
2	150 001 - 300 000	870	9.9%	0.09886364
3	300 001 - 400 000	1321	15.0%	0.15011364
4	400 001 - 500 000	1319	15.0%	0.14988636
5	500 001 - 600 000	1217	13.8%	0.13829545
6	600 001 - 700 000	1243	14.1%	0.14125000
7	700 001 - 1 000 000	1582	18.0%	0.17977273
8	More than 1 000000	838	9.5%	0.09522727
97	Not answered	186	2.1%	0.02113636
98	Not asked	1197		NA

r20bkhelse

Variable label:	In general, how would you say your health is?
Literal question:	In general, would you say your health is:
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Excellent	870	14.0%	0.14034522
2	Very good	2262	36.5%	0.36489756
3	Good	2164	34.9%	0.34908856
4	Somewhat good	726	11.7%	0.11711566
5	Poor	158	2.5%	0.02548798
97	Not answered	19	0.3%	0.00306501
98	Not asked	3798		NA

r22bkhelse

Variable label:	In general, how would you say your health is?
Literal question:	In general, how would you say your health is?
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Excellent	204	15.9%	0.158754864
2	Very good	473	36.8%	0.368093385
3	Good	395	30.7%	0.307392996
4	Somewhat good	138	10.7%	0.107392996
5	Poor	64	5.0%	0.049805447
97	Not answered	11	0.9%	0.008560311
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r23bkhelse

Variable label:	In general, would you say your health is:
Literal question:	In general, would you say your health is:
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Excellent	836	12.8%	0.127946128
2	Very good	2157	33.0%	0.330119376
3	Good	2298	35.2%	0.351698806
4	Somewhat good	926	14.2%	0.141720233
5	Poor	274	4.2%	0.041934496
97	Not answered	43	0.7%	0.006580961
98	Not asked	3463		NA

r25_bghea

Variable label:	In general, how would you say your health is?
Literal question:	In general, how would you say your health is?
Technical description:	[Posed if [r25_group] = 3 \| 6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Excellent	310	11.0%	0.110085227
2	Very good	900	32.0%	0.319602273
3	Good	1062	37.7%	0.377130682
4	Somewhat good	402	14.3%	0.142755682
5	Poor	125	4.4%	0.044389205
97	Not answered	17	0.6%	0.006036932
98	Not asked	7181		NA

r26_bghea

Variable label:	In general, how would you say your health is?
Literal question:	In general, how would you say your health is?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Excellent	425	9.2%	0.092491839
2	Very good	1417	30.8%	0.308378672
3	Good	1743	37.9%	0.379325354
4	Somewhat good	786	17.1%	0.171055495
5	Poor	198	4.3%	0.043090316
97	Not answered	26	0.6%	0.005658324
98	Not asked	5402		NA

r26_bghel

Variable label:	In general, how would you say your health is?
Literal question:	In general, how would you say your health is?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Excellent	207	19.0%	0.189908257
2	Good	569	52.2%	0.522018349
3	Moderately good	219	20.1%	0.200917431
4	Not very good	75	6.9%	0.068807339
5	Poor	16	1.5%	0.014678899
97	Not answered	4	0.4%	0.003669725
98	Not asked	8907		NA

r22bk35

Variable label:	Which description best fits the area you live in?
Literal question:	Which description best fits the area you live in?
Post-question:	We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A city	332	25.8%	0.258365759
2	A suburb or the outskirts of a city	255	19.8%	0.198443580
3	A small or medium sized town	365	28.4%	0.284046693
4	A village	200	15.6%	0.155642023
5	A sparsely inhabited area	122	9.5%	0.094941634
97	Not answered	11	0.9%	0.008560311
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r23bk35

Variable label:	Which description best fits the area you live in?
Literal question:	Which description best fits the area you live in?
Post-question:	We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A city	1548	23.7%	0.236914601
2	A suburb or the outskirts of a city	1396	21.4%	0.213651668
3	A small or medium sized town	1812	27.7%	0.277318641
4	A village	1004	15.4%	0.153657790
5	A sparsely inhabited area	735	11.2%	0.112488522
97	Not answered	39	0.6%	0.005968779
98	Not asked	3463		NA

r25_bgurb

Variable label:	Which description best fits the area you live in?
Literal question:	Which description best fits the area you live in?
Post-question:	We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
Technical description:	[Posed if [r25_group] = 1 \| 6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A city	728	27.2%	0.271641791
2	A suburb or the outskirts of a city	477	17.8%	0.177985075
3	A small or medium sized town	809	30.2%	0.301865672
4	A village	426	15.9%	0.158955224
5	A sparsely inhabited area	224	8.4%	0.083582090
97	Not answered	16	0.6%	0.005970149
98	Not asked	7317		NA

r26k2_bgurb

Variable label:	Which description best fits the area you live in?
Literal question:	Which description best fits the area you live in?
Post-question:	We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
Equivalent in others panels:	f3k2_bgurb; p9k2_bgurb
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A city	789	25.3%	0.253290530
2	A suburb or the outskirts of a city	668	21.4%	0.214446228
3	A small or medium sized town	850	27.3%	0.272873194
4	A village	436	14.0%	0.139967897
5	A sparsely inhabited area	353	11.3%	0.113322632
97	Not answered	19	0.6%	0.006099518
98	Not asked	6882		NA

r23tdr19

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree with the following statement:
Literal question:	Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	994	12.9%	0.128756477
2	Agree	2724	35.3%	0.352849741
3	Somewhat agree	2221	28.8%	0.287694301
4	Neither agree nor disagree	947	12.3%	0.122668394
5	Somewhat disagree	463	6.0%	0.059974093
6	Disagree	253	3.3%	0.032772021
7	Strongly disagree	71	0.9%	0.009196891
97	Not answered	47	0.6%	0.006088083
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r25_cpres

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree with the following statement:
Literal question:	Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality.
Technical description:	[Asked if r25_group = 1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	214	14.5%	0.145479266
2	Agree	503	34.2%	0.341944256
3	Agree somewhat	462	31.4%	0.314072060
4	Neither agree nor disagree	140	9.5%	0.095173351
5	Disagree somewhat	85	5.8%	0.057783821
6	Disagree	41	2.8%	0.027872196
7	Strongly disagree	24	1.6%	0.016315432
97	Not answered	2	0.1%	0.001359619
98	Not asked	8526		NA

r16k43_1_kodet

Variable label:	Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections this autumn? [coded]
Literal question:	Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections this autumn?
Technical description:	[Alle respondentene spurt. Rekkefølgen på svaralternativene er randomisert. ] [Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler] [Added recoded values from _other-variables]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	200	3.3%	0.032835331
2	The Conservative Party	1232	20.2%	0.202265638
3	The Progress Party	314	5.2%	0.051551469
4	The Liberal Party	247	4.1%	0.040551634
5	The Socialist Left Party	547	9.0%	0.089804630
6	The Centre Party	720	11.8%	0.118207191
7	The Green Party	570	9.4%	0.093580693
8	The Labour Party	1204	19.8%	0.197668692
9	The Red Party	317	5.2%	0.052043999
10	The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative)	135	2.2%	0.022163848
11	A joint party list	8	0.1%	0.001313413
12	A local party list	120	2.0%	0.019701198
13	Voted blank	45	0.7%	0.007387949
14	Did not vote	301	4.9%	0.049417173
15	Not entitled to vote	12	0.2%	0.001970120
16	Other:	100	1.6%	0.016417665
97	Not answered	19	0.3%	0.003119356
98	Not asked	3906		NA

r16k43_2_kodet

Variable label:	Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council election this autumn? [coded]
Literal question:	Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council election this autumn?
Technical description:	[Alle respondentene spurt. Rekkefølgen på svaralternativene er randomisert (men tilsvarer rekkefølgen til r16k43_1).] [Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler] [Added recoded values from _other-variables]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	198	3.3%	0.0325069775
2	The Conservative Party	1206	19.8%	0.1979970448
3	The Progress Party	340	5.6%	0.0558200624
4	The Liberal Party	227	3.7%	0.0372681005
5	The Socialist Left Party	509	8.4%	0.0835659169
6	The Centre Party	771	12.7%	0.1265802003
7	The Green Party	563	9.2%	0.0924314562
8	The Labour Party	1105	18.1%	0.1814152028
9	The Red Party	299	4.9%	0.0490888196
10	The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative)	118	1.9%	0.0193728452
11	A joint party list	2	0.0%	0.0003283533
12	A local party list	33	0.5%	0.0054178296
13	Voted blank	70	1.1%	0.0114923658
14	Did not vote	443	7.3%	0.0727302578
15	Not entitled to vote	43	0.7%	0.0070595961
16	Other:	119	2.0%	0.0195370218
97	Not answered	45	0.7%	0.0073879494
98	Not asked	3906		NA

r22k3_kodet

Variable label:	Which party did you vote for in the parliamentary elections? [coded]
Literal question:	Which party did you vote for in the parliamentary elections?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [Added recoded values from _other-variables]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	287	3.6%	0.036301543
2	The Conservative Party	1547	19.6%	0.195674172
3	The Progress Party	551	7.0%	0.069693903
4	The Liberal Party	398	5.0%	0.050341513
5	The Socialist Left Party	824	10.4%	0.104224640
6	The Centre Party	839	10.6%	0.106121933
7	The Green Party	441	5.6%	0.055780420
8	The Labour Party	1779	22.5%	0.225018973
9	The Red Party	499	6.3%	0.063116620
10	Other:	211	2.7%	0.026688591
11	Did not vote	181	2.3%	0.022894005
12	Not entitled to vote	281	3.6%	0.035542626
13	Voted blank	44	0.6%	0.005565393
97	Not answered	24	0.3%	0.003035669
98	Not asked	2091		NA

r25_pcvot21

Variable label:	Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in 2021
Literal question:	Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in 2021
Technical description:	[Asked if r25_group = 6] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	38	3.1%	0.031430935
2	The Conservative Party	236	19.5%	0.195202647
3	The Progress Party	71	5.9%	0.058726220
4	The Liberal Party	60	5.0%	0.049627792
5	The Socialist Left Party	91	7.5%	0.075268817
6	The Centre Party	117	9.7%	0.096774194
7	The Green Party	87	7.2%	0.071960298
8	The Labour Party	281	23.2%	0.232423490
9	The Red Party	86	7.1%	0.071133168
10	Other:	40	3.3%	0.033085194
11	Did not vote	35	2.9%	0.028949545
12	Not entitled to vote	54	4.5%	0.044665012
13	Voted blank	6	0.5%	0.004962779
97	Not answered	7	0.6%	0.005789909
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r20tdr8_a_kodet

Variable label:	Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow? [coded]
Literal question:	Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Technical description:	[Alle respondenter spurt] [Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert] [Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler] [Added recoded values from _other-variables]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	190	3.1%	0.030650105
2	The Conservative Party	1427	23.0%	0.230198419
3	The Progress Party	308	5.0%	0.049685433
4	The Liberal Party	193	3.1%	0.031134054
5	The Socialist Left Party	541	8.7%	0.087272141
6	The Centre Party	838	13.5%	0.135183094
7	The Green Party	470	7.6%	0.075818680
8	The Labour Party	1244	20.1%	0.200677529
9	The Red Party	348	5.6%	0.056138087
10	The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative)	59	1.0%	0.009517664
11	A joint party list	6	0.1%	0.000967898
12	A local list	123	2.0%	0.019841910
13	Would cast a blank vote	100	1.6%	0.016131634
14	Would not vote	111	1.8%	0.017906114
15	Not entitled to vote	9	0.1%	0.001451847
16	Other:	196	3.2%	0.031618003
97	Not answered	36	0.6%	0.005807388
98	Not asked	3798		NA

r21tdr8a

Variable label:	Would vote for which party if municipal elections tomorrow
Literal question:	Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Technical description:	[Asked if r21group = 1] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	36	3.0%	0.0295081967
2	The Conservative Party	288	23.6%	0.2360655738
3	The Progress Party	68	5.6%	0.0557377049
4	The Liberal Party	39	3.2%	0.0319672131
5	The Socialist Left Party	103	8.4%	0.0844262295
6	The Centre Party	141	11.6%	0.1155737705
7	The Green Party	100	8.2%	0.0819672131
8	The Labour Party	244	20.0%	0.2000000000
9	The Red Party	86	7.0%	0.0704918033
10	The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative)	5	0.4%	0.0040983607
11	A joint party list	2	0.2%	0.0016393443
12	A local list	18	1.5%	0.0147540984
13	Would not vote	26	2.1%	0.0213114754
14	Would cast a blank vote	14	1.1%	0.0114754098
15	Not entitled to vote	0	0.0%	0.0000000000
16	Other:	49	4.0%	0.0401639344
97	Not answered	1	0.1%	0.0008196721
98	Not asked	8777		NA

r20tdr8_b_kodet

Variable label:	Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow? [coded]
Literal question:	Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Technical description:	[Alle respondenter spurt] [Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert] [Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler] [Added recoded values from _other-variables]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	173	2.8%	0.027907727
2	The Conservative Party	1356	21.9%	0.218744959
3	The Progress Party	323	5.2%	0.052105178
4	The Liberal Party	177	2.9%	0.028552992
5	The Socialist Left Party	572	9.2%	0.092272947
6	The Centre Party	883	14.2%	0.142442329
7	The Green Party	448	7.2%	0.072269721
8	The Labour Party	1128	18.2%	0.181964833
9	The Red Party	311	5.0%	0.050169382
10	The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative)	54	0.9%	0.008711082
11	A joint party list	10	0.2%	0.001613163
12	A local list	44	0.7%	0.007097919
13	Would cast a blank vote	153	2.5%	0.024681400
14	Would not vote	249	4.0%	0.040167769
15	Not entitled to vote	39	0.6%	0.006291337
16	Other:	216	3.5%	0.034844330
97	Not answered	63	1.0%	0.010162930
98	Not asked	3798		NA

r21tdr8b

Variable label:	Would vote for which party if county council elections tomorrow
Literal question:	Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Technical description:	[Asked if r21group = 1] [Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	36	3.0%	0.0295081967
2	The Conservative Party	275	22.5%	0.2254098361
3	The Progress Party	72	5.9%	0.0590163934
4	The Liberal Party	41	3.4%	0.0336065574
5	The Socialist Left Party	111	9.1%	0.0909836066
6	The Centre Party	150	12.3%	0.1229508197
7	The Green Party	90	7.4%	0.0737704918
8	The Labour Party	217	17.8%	0.1778688525
9	The Red Party	76	6.2%	0.0622950820
10	The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative)	11	0.9%	0.0090163934
11	A joint party list	0	0.0%	0.0000000000
12	A local list	7	0.6%	0.0057377049
13	Would not vote	34	2.8%	0.0278688525
14	Would cast a blank vote	43	3.5%	0.0352459016
15	Not entitled to vote	1	0.1%	0.0008196721
16	Other:	49	4.0%	0.0401639344
97	Not answered	7	0.6%	0.0057377049
98	Not asked	8777		NA

r23pk12

Variable label:	What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Literal question:	What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very high degree	585	7.6%	0.07577720
2	A high degree	3649	47.3%	0.47266839
3	Some degree	2516	32.6%	0.32590674
4	A low degree	759	9.8%	0.09831606
5	Not at all	200	2.6%	0.02590674
97	Not answered	11	0.1%	0.00142487
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pccos

Variable label:	What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Literal question:	What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very high degree	258	4.5%	0.045382586
2	A high degree	2142	37.7%	0.376781003
3	Some degree	2174	38.2%	0.382409850
4	A low degree	802	14.1%	0.141072999
5	Not at all	264	4.6%	0.046437995
97	Not answered	45	0.8%	0.007915567
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pk53

Variable label:	Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Literal question:	Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very high degree	180	2.3%	0.023316062
2	A high degree	2741	35.5%	0.355051813
3	Some degree	3326	43.1%	0.430829016
4	A low degree	1154	14.9%	0.149481865
5	Not at all	279	3.6%	0.036139896
97	Not answered	40	0.5%	0.005181347
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pccop

Variable label:	Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Literal question:	Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very high degree	117	2.1%	0.020580475
2	A high degree	1586	27.9%	0.278979771
3	Some degree	2421	42.6%	0.425857520
4	A low degree	1175	20.7%	0.206684257
5	Not at all	341	6.0%	0.059982410
97	Not answered	45	0.8%	0.007915567
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pk54

Variable label:	What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Literal question:	What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very high degree	473	6.1%	0.061269430
2	A high degree	3318	43.0%	0.429792746
3	Some degree	2913	37.7%	0.377331606
4	A low degree	757	9.8%	0.098056995
5	Not at all	222	2.9%	0.028756477
97	Not answered	37	0.5%	0.004792746
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pccom

Variable label:	What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Literal question:	What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very high degree	236	4.2%	0.041512753
2	A high degree	2198	38.7%	0.386631486
3	Some degree	2356	41.4%	0.414423923
4	A low degree	688	12.1%	0.121020229
5	Not at all	178	3.1%	0.031310466
97	Not answered	29	0.5%	0.005101143
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23cov_trust_1

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Confidence in the way national authorities are handling and are prepared for the coronavirus pandemic.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question:	I have confidence in the way national authorities are handling and are prepared to tackle the coronavirus pandemic.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely disagree	278	3.6%	0.03601036
2	Disagree	844	10.9%	0.10932642
3	Neither agree nor disagree	1278	16.6%	0.16554404
4	Agree	4321	56.0%	0.55971503
5	Completely agree	988	12.8%	0.12797927
97	Not answered	11	0.1%	0.00142487
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r23pk15

Variable label:	Can most people be trusted, or one cannot be careful enough?
Literal question:	Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0 - Cannot be careful enough	49	0.6%	0.0063471503
1	1	40	0.5%	0.0051813472
2	2	106	1.4%	0.0137305699
3	3	231	3.0%	0.0299222798
4	4	233	3.0%	0.0301813472
5	5	559	7.2%	0.0724093264
6	6	618	8.0%	0.0800518135
7	7	1689	21.9%	0.2187823834
8	8	2186	28.3%	0.2831606218
9	9	1054	13.7%	0.1365284974
10	10 – Most people can be trusted	948	12.3%	0.1227979275
97	Not answered	7	0.1%	0.0009067358
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pccoo

Variable label:	Most people in general can be trusted
Literal question:	Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0 - Cannot be careful enough	18	0.3%	0.003166227
1	1	44	0.8%	0.007739666
2	2	75	1.3%	0.013192612
3	3	179	3.1%	0.031486368
4	4	190	3.3%	0.033421284
5	5	422	7.4%	0.074230431
6	6	553	9.7%	0.097273527
7	7	1325	23.3%	0.233069481
8	8	1956	34.4%	0.344063325
9	9	663	11.7%	0.116622691
10	10 – Most people can be trusted	245	4.3%	0.043095866
97	Not answered	15	0.3%	0.002638522
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pktilfreds1

Variable label:	All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Literal question:	All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	1980	25.6%	0.256476684
2	Satisfied	4623	59.9%	0.598834197
3	Somewhat satisfied	890	11.5%	0.115284974
4	Dissatisfied	180	2.3%	0.023316062
5	Not satisfied at all	38	0.5%	0.004922280
97	Not answered	9	0.1%	0.001165803
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcsal

Variable label:	How satisfied are you with life
Literal question:	All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	1558	27.4%	0.274054529
2	Satisfied	3270	57.5%	0.575197889
3	Somewhat satisfied	673	11.8%	0.118381706
4	Dissatisfied	148	2.6%	0.026033421
5	Not satisfied at all	28	0.5%	0.004925242
97	Not answered	8	0.1%	0.001407212
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pk60

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The Government should work to reduce the income differences.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question:	The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income differences in society.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	2208	28.6%	0.286010363
2	Agree	2185	28.3%	0.283031088
3	Somewhat agree	1649	21.4%	0.213601036
4	Neither agree nor disagree	715	9.3%	0.092616580
5	Somewhat disagree	457	5.9%	0.059196891
6	Disagree	341	4.4%	0.044170984
7	Strongly disagree	124	1.6%	0.016062176
97	Not answered	41	0.5%	0.005310881
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcinc

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following suggestion: The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society to greater extent.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	1464	25.8%	0.257519789
2	Agree	1681	29.6%	0.295690413
3	Agree somewhat	1244	21.9%	0.218821460
4	Neither agree nor disagree	511	9.0%	0.089885664
5	Disagree somewhat	424	7.5%	0.074582234
6	Disagree	250	4.4%	0.043975374
7	Strongly disagree	93	1.6%	0.016358839
97	Not answered	18	0.3%	0.003166227
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23bk33_kodet

Variable label:	Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days. [coded]
Literal question:	Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Post-question:	Tick one of the options.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Added recoded values from _other-variables]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-14]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	100% furloughed by employer	15	0.2%	0.0019430052
2	Partially furloughed by employer	16	0.2%	0.0020725389
3	In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave)	3458	44.8%	0.4479274611
4	In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more	255	3.3%	0.0330310881
5	In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week	233	3.0%	0.0301813472
6	Self-employed	297	3.8%	0.0384715026
7	In education (not paid by an employer)	147	1.9%	0.0190414508
8	Unemployed and actively seeking a job	44	0.6%	0.0056994819
9	Unemployed and not actively seeking a job	22	0.3%	0.0028497409
10	Permanently ill or disabled	442	5.7%	0.0572538860
11	Retired	2652	34.4%	0.3435233161
12	In military service	2	0.0%	0.0002590674
13	Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons	53	0.7%	0.0068652850
14	Other:	47	0.6%	0.0060880829
97	Not answered	37	0.5%	0.0047927461
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r23bk21_kodet

Variable label:	Which type of business do you work in? [coded]
Literal question:	Which type of business do you work in?
Technical description:	[Asked if r23bk33 = 1, 2,3, 4, 5] [Added recoded values from _other-variables]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	State, county or municipal administration	479	12.2%	0.121851946
2	Public sector (e.g. school and health services)	1255	31.9%	0.319257186
3	Publicly owned enterprise	257	6.5%	0.065377766
4	Private business	1895	48.2%	0.482065632
5	Self-employed	19	0.5%	0.004833376
6	Other:	22	0.6%	0.005596540
97	Not answered	4	0.1%	0.001017553
98	Not asked	6066		NA

r26_bgoil

Variable label:	[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely associated with it?
Literal question:	[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely associated with it?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_bgday = 1,2,3,9) & (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes, I [work/worked] in the oil or gas industry	210	4.4%	0.044219836
2	Yes, my job [is/was] closely associated with the oil or gas industry	174	3.7%	0.036639292
3	No, but previously I have worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely associated with it	129	2.7%	0.027163613
4	No	4222	88.9%	0.889029269
97	Not answered	14	0.3%	0.002947989
98	Not asked	5248		NA

r26_bgoily

Variable label:	When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry?
Literal question:	When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry (or your first job closely associated with the oil and gas industry)?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_bgoil = 1,2) & (r26_group = 1,2)] [Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Open] [Format:integer] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
98		9997		NA

r23tdr17

Variable label:	Economic situation in [region] compared to [region]
Literal question:	If you compare the economic situation in [region] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation in [region] as better, worse or the same?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Better	1625	21.0%	0.210492228
2	The same	4850	62.8%	0.628238342
3	Worse	1175	15.2%	0.152202073
97	Not answered	70	0.9%	0.009067358
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r25_pcecr

Variable label:	Economic situation in [r25_P2] compared to the rest of the country
Literal question:	If you compare the economic situation [r25_P2] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation [r25_P2] as being better, the same or worse?
Technical description:	[Asked if r25_group = 1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Better	347	23.6%	0.235893950
2	The same	871	59.2%	0.592114208
3	Worse	241	16.4%	0.163834126
97	Not answered	12	0.8%	0.008157716
98	Not asked	8526		NA

r26_pcecr

Variable label:	Economic situation in [r26_P2] compared to the rest of the country
Literal question:	If you compare the economic situation [r26_P2] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation [r26_P2] as being better, the same or worse?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Better	1234	21.7%	0.217062445
2	The same	3444	60.6%	0.605804749
3	Worse	957	16.8%	0.168337731
97	Not answered	50	0.9%	0.008795075
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r22pkklasse

Variable label:	Which social class would you place yourself in?
Pre-question text:	We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
Literal question:	If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Lower class	23	1.8%	0.017898833
2	Working class	146	11.4%	0.113618677
3	Lower middle class	118	9.2%	0.091828794
4	Middle class	708	55.1%	0.550972763
5	Upper middle class	232	18.1%	0.180544747
6	Upper class	8	0.6%	0.006225681
7	Don't know	40	3.1%	0.031128405
97	Not answered	10	0.8%	0.007782101
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r23pkklasse

Variable label:	Which social class would you place yourself in?
Pre-question text:	We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
Literal question:	If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Lower class	82	1.3%	0.012549740
2	Working class	791	12.1%	0.121059076
3	Lower middle class	719	11.0%	0.110039792
4	Middle class	3752	57.4%	0.574227120
5	Upper middle class	1098	16.8%	0.168044077
6	Upper class	27	0.4%	0.004132231
97	Not answered	65	1.0%	0.009947964
98	Not asked	3463		NA

r25_bgcla

Variable label:	Social class, personal placement.
Pre-question text:	We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
Literal question:	If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
Technical description:	[Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Lower class	15	1.2%	0.01240695
2	Working class	150	12.4%	0.12406948
3	Lower middle class	126	10.4%	0.10421836
4	Middle class	640	52.9%	0.52936311
5	Upper middle class	219	18.1%	0.18114144
6	Upper class	3	0.2%	0.00248139
7	Do not know	42	3.5%	0.03473945
97	Not answered	14	1.2%	0.01157982
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r20pk1

Variable label:	In general, how interested are you in politics?
Literal question:	In general, how interested are you in politics?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very interested	1072	17.3%	0.172931118
2	Interested	2897	46.7%	0.467333441
3	Somewhat interested	1809	29.2%	0.291821261
4	Not very interested	352	5.7%	0.056783352
5	Not interested at all	46	0.7%	0.007420552
97	Not answered	23	0.4%	0.003710276
98	Not asked	3798		NA

r22pk1

Variable label:	In general, how interested are you in politics?
Literal question:	In general, how interested are you in politics?
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very interested	205	16.0%	0.159533074
2	Interested	565	44.0%	0.439688716
3	Somewhat interested	394	30.7%	0.306614786
4	Not very interested	105	8.2%	0.081712062
5	Not interested at all	9	0.7%	0.007003891
97	Not answered	7	0.5%	0.005447471
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r25_pcpin

Variable label:	How interested are you in politics?
Literal question:	In general, how interested are you in politics?
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very interested	176	14.6%	0.14557486
2	Interested	544	45.0%	0.44995864
3	Somewhat interested	362	29.9%	0.29942101
4	Not very interested	99	8.2%	0.08188586
5	Not interested at all	26	2.2%	0.02150538
97	Not answered	2	0.2%	0.00165426
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r26_pcpin

Variable label:	How interested are you in politics?
Literal question:	In general, how interested are you in politics?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very interested	735	16.0%	0.1599564744
2	Interested	2303	50.1%	0.5011969532
3	Somewhat interested	1245	27.1%	0.2709466812
4	Not very interested	274	6.0%	0.0596300326
5	Not interested at all	35	0.8%	0.0076169750
97	Not answered	3	0.1%	0.0006528836
98	Not asked	5402		NA

r26k2_bglrs

Variable label:	Personal placement on political left and right wing scale
Literal question:	In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right. Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Equivalent in others panels:	f3k2_bglrs; p9k2_bglrs
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2) \| (r26_group = 3,4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0 - Left wing	176	2.0%	0.02042711
1	1	482	5.6%	0.05594243
2	2	1012	11.7%	0.11745590
3	3	1182	13.7%	0.13718663
4	4	950	11.0%	0.11025998
5	5	1150	13.3%	0.13347261
6	6	907	10.5%	0.10526927
7	7	1145	13.3%	0.13289229
8	8	1066	12.4%	0.12372331
9	9	360	4.2%	0.04178273
10	10 - Right wing	186	2.2%	0.02158774
98		1381		NA

r14pk14

Variable label:	Agree/Disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated people like me do not understand it.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question:	Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	129	3.0%	0.029868025
2	Agree	417	9.7%	0.096550127
3	Agree somewhat	1264	29.3%	0.292660338
4	Neither agree nor disagree	437	10.1%	0.101180829
5	Disagree somewhat	544	12.6%	0.125955082
6	Disagree	1123	26.0%	0.260013892
7	Strongly disagree	395	9.1%	0.091456356
97	Not answered	10	0.2%	0.002315351
98	Not asked	5678		NA

r17pk14

Variable label:	Assertion: Sometimes politics is so complicated that it’s hard to understand
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question:	Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert = 16]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	75	4.4%	0.044457617
2	Agree	204	12.1%	0.120924718
3	Agree somewhat	417	24.7%	0.247184351
4	Neither agree nor disagree	156	9.2%	0.092471844
5	Disagree somewhat	222	13.2%	0.131594547
6	Disagree	403	23.9%	0.238885596
7	Strongly disagree	201	11.9%	0.119146414
97	Not answered	9	0.5%	0.005334914
98	Not asked	8310		NA

r20pk14

Variable label:	Assertion: Sometimes politics is so complicated that it’s hard to understand
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question:	Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	21	3.6%	0.035653650
2	Agree	40	6.8%	0.067911715
3	Agree somewhat	145	24.6%	0.246179966
4	Neither agree nor disagree	45	7.6%	0.076400679
5	Disagree somewhat	83	14.1%	0.140916808
6	Disagree	172	29.2%	0.292020374
7	Strongly disagree	82	13.9%	0.139219015
97	Not answered	1	0.2%	0.001697793
98	Not asked	9408		NA

r23pk14

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question:	Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 22]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	52	4.4%	0.043844857
2	Agree	119	10.0%	0.100337268
3	Somewhat agree	319	26.9%	0.268971332
4	Neither agree nor disagree	104	8.8%	0.087689713
5	Somewhat disagree	126	10.6%	0.106239460
6	Disagree	322	27.2%	0.271500843
7	Strongly disagree	138	11.6%	0.116357504
97	Not answered	6	0.5%	0.005059022
98	Not asked	8811		NA

r26_pcepe

Variable label:	How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
Literal question:	How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great extent	18	1.7%	0.016513761
2	To a great extent	122	11.2%	0.111926606
3	Somewhat	437	40.1%	0.400917431
4	Slightly	384	35.2%	0.352293578
5	Not at all	122	11.2%	0.111926606
97	Not answered	7	0.6%	0.006422018
98	Not asked	8907		NA

r14pk13

Variable label:	How much say in what the government does does the political system in Norway allow people like you.
Literal question:	How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great extent	27	0.6%	0.006251447
2	To a great extent	477	11.0%	0.110442232
3	To some extent	1887	43.7%	0.436906691
4	To a small extent	1584	36.7%	0.366751563
5	Not at all	328	7.6%	0.075943505
97	Not answered	16	0.4%	0.003704561
98	Not asked	5678		NA

r17pk13

Variable label:	Whether the political system in Norway allow you to have a say
Literal question:	How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert = 16]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great extent	15	0.9%	0.008891523
2	To a great extent	175	10.4%	0.103734440
3	To some extent	767	45.5%	0.454653231
4	To a small extent	568	33.7%	0.336692353
5	Not at all	152	9.0%	0.090100771
97	Not answered	10	0.6%	0.005927682
98	Not asked	8310		NA

r20pk13

Variable label:	Whether the political system in Norway allows you to have a say
Literal question:	How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very high degree	7	1.2%	0.011884550
2	A high degree	73	12.4%	0.123938879
3	Some degree	291	49.4%	0.494057725
4	A low degree	188	31.9%	0.319185059
5	Not at all	27	4.6%	0.045840407
97	Not answered	3	0.5%	0.005093379
98	Not asked	9408		NA

r23pk13

Variable label:	Whether the political system in Norway allows you to have a say
Literal question:	To what extent would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 22]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very high degree	28	2.4%	0.023608769
2	A high degree	170	14.3%	0.143338954
3	Some degree	471	39.7%	0.397133221
4	A low degree	373	31.5%	0.314502530
5	Not at all	135	11.4%	0.113827993
97	Not answered	9	0.8%	0.007588533
98	Not asked	8811		NA

r26_pcipe

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	52	4.8%	0.0477064220
2	Agree	152	13.9%	0.1394495413
3	Agree somewhat	323	29.6%	0.2963302752
4	Neither agree nor disagree	119	10.9%	0.1091743119
5	Disagree somewhat	137	12.6%	0.1256880734
6	Disagree	222	20.4%	0.2036697248
7	Strongly disagree	84	7.7%	0.0770642202
97	Not answered	1	0.1%	0.0009174312
98	Not asked	8907		NA

r25_pcsag

Variable label:	How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Literal question:	How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	164	1.8%	0.018212104
2	Satisfied	1928	21.4%	0.214103276
3	Somewhat satisfied	2951	32.8%	0.327706830
4	Dissatisfied	2542	28.2%	0.282287618
5	Not satisfied at all	1410	15.7%	0.156579678
97	Not answered	10	0.1%	0.001110494
98	Not asked	992		NA

r26k2_pcsad

Variable label:	How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Literal question:	How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Question owner:	Lise Bjånesøy (UiB), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Åsa von Schoultz (UiH)
Equivalent in others panels:	f3k2_pcsad; p9k2_pcsad
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2) \| (r26_group = 3,4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	1435	16.3%	0.1630681818
2	Satisfied	4575	52.0%	0.5198863636
3	Somewhat satisfied	1848	21.0%	0.2100000000
4	Dissatisfied	739	8.4%	0.0839772727
5	Not satisfied at all	195	2.2%	0.0221590909
97	Not answered	8	0.1%	0.0009090909
98	Not asked	1197		NA

r23pk6_1

Variable label:	Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Christian Democratic Party.
Literal question:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties: The Christian Democratic Party
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	1334	17.3%	0.172797927
2	Really dislike	1551	20.1%	0.200906736
3	Dislike somewhat	1880	24.4%	0.243523316
4	Neither dislike nor like	1590	20.6%	0.205958549
5	Like somewhat	977	12.7%	0.126554404
6	Really like	266	3.4%	0.034455959
7	Intensely like	66	0.9%	0.008549223
97	Not answered	56	0.7%	0.007253886
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r23pk6_2

Variable label:	Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Conservative Party.
Literal question:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties: The Conservative Party
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	369	4.8%	0.047797927
2	Really dislike	1006	13.0%	0.130310881
3	Dislike somewhat	1357	17.6%	0.175777202
4	Neither dislike nor like	1057	13.7%	0.136917098
5	Like somewhat	1958	25.4%	0.253626943
6	Really like	1488	19.3%	0.192746114
7	Intensely like	434	5.6%	0.056217617
97	Not answered	51	0.7%	0.006606218
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r23pk6_3

Variable label:	Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Progress Party.
Literal question:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties: The Progess Party
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	2443	31.6%	0.316450777
2	Really dislike	1567	20.3%	0.202979275
3	Dislike somewhat	1089	14.1%	0.141062176
4	Neither dislike nor like	716	9.3%	0.092746114
5	Like somewhat	1143	14.8%	0.148056995
6	Really like	543	7.0%	0.070336788
7	Intensely like	171	2.2%	0.022150259
97	Not answered	48	0.6%	0.006217617
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r23pk6_4

Variable label:	Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Liberal Party.
Literal question:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties: The Liberal Party
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	611	7.9%	0.079145078
2	Really dislike	971	12.6%	0.125777202
3	Dislike somewhat	1647	21.3%	0.213341969
4	Neither dislike nor like	1983	25.7%	0.256865285
5	Like somewhat	1784	23.1%	0.231088083
6	Really like	562	7.3%	0.072797927
7	Intensely like	101	1.3%	0.013082902
97	Not answered	61	0.8%	0.007901554
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r23pk6_5

Variable label:	Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Socialist Party.
Literal question:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties: The Socialist Party
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	859	11.1%	0.111269430
2	Really dislike	1112	14.4%	0.144041451
3	Dislike somewhat	1258	16.3%	0.162953368
4	Neither dislike nor like	1092	14.1%	0.141450777
5	Like somewhat	1703	22.1%	0.220595855
6	Really like	1226	15.9%	0.158808290
7	Intensely like	411	5.3%	0.053238342
97	Not answered	59	0.8%	0.007642487
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r23pk6_6

Variable label:	Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Centre Party.
Literal question:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties: The Centre Party
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	655	8.5%	0.084844560
2	Really dislike	1100	14.2%	0.142487047
3	Dislike somewhat	1823	23.6%	0.236139896
4	Neither dislike nor like	1570	20.3%	0.203367876
5	Like somewhat	1799	23.3%	0.233031088
6	Really like	625	8.1%	0.080958549
7	Intensely like	93	1.2%	0.012046632
97	Not answered	55	0.7%	0.007124352
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r23pk6_7

Variable label:	Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Green Party.
Literal question:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties: The Green Party
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	1814	23.5%	0.234974093
2	Really dislike	1207	15.6%	0.156347150
3	Dislike somewhat	1250	16.2%	0.161917098
4	Neither dislike nor like	955	12.4%	0.123704663
5	Like somewhat	1560	20.2%	0.202072539
6	Really like	711	9.2%	0.092098446
7	Intensely like	172	2.2%	0.022279793
97	Not answered	51	0.7%	0.006606218
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r23pk6_8

Variable label:	Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Labour Party.
Literal question:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties: The Labour Party
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	401	5.2%	0.051943005
2	Really dislike	701	9.1%	0.090803109
3	Dislike somewhat	1338	17.3%	0.173316062
4	Neither dislike nor like	1043	13.5%	0.135103627
5	Like somewhat	2467	32.0%	0.319559585
6	Really like	1474	19.1%	0.190932642
7	Intensely like	251	3.3%	0.032512953
97	Not answered	45	0.6%	0.005829016
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r23pk6_9

Variable label:	Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Red Party.
Literal question:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties: The Red Party
Technical description:	[All respondents asked] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	1370	17.7%	0.177461140
2	Really dislike	1089	14.1%	0.141062176
3	Dislike somewhat	1101	14.3%	0.142616580
4	Neither dislike nor like	1120	14.5%	0.145077720
5	Like somewhat	1739	22.5%	0.225259067
6	Really like	882	11.4%	0.114248705
7	Intensely like	366	4.7%	0.047409326
97	Not answered	53	0.7%	0.006865285
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r25_pcldk

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Christian Democratic Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	177	14.8%	0.14774624
2	Really dislike	246	20.5%	0.20534224
3	Dislike somewhat	263	22.0%	0.21953255
4	Neither dislike nor like	295	24.6%	0.24624374
5	Like somewhat	162	13.5%	0.13522538
6	Really like	42	3.5%	0.03505843
7	Intensely like	13	1.1%	0.01085142
98		8799		NA

r25_pcldh

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Conservative Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	52	4.3%	0.04347826
2	Really dislike	138	11.5%	0.11538462
3	Dislike somewhat	225	18.8%	0.18812709
4	Neither dislike nor like	173	14.5%	0.14464883
5	Like somewhat	291	24.3%	0.24331104
6	Really like	239	20.0%	0.19983278
7	Intensely like	78	6.5%	0.06521739
98		8801		NA

r25_pcldf

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Progress Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Progress Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	330	27.5%	0.2750000
2	Really dislike	265	22.1%	0.2208333
3	Dislike somewhat	185	15.4%	0.1541667
4	Neither dislike nor like	128	10.7%	0.1066667
5	Like somewhat	169	14.1%	0.1408333
6	Really like	87	7.2%	0.0725000
7	Intensely like	36	3.0%	0.0300000
98		8797		NA

r25_pcldv

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Liberal Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	81	6.8%	0.06801008
2	Really dislike	149	12.5%	0.12510495
3	Dislike somewhat	241	20.2%	0.20235097
4	Neither dislike nor like	337	28.3%	0.28295550
5	Like somewhat	267	22.4%	0.22418136
6	Really like	95	8.0%	0.07976490
7	Intensely like	21	1.8%	0.01763224
98		8806		NA

r25_pcldsv

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Socialist Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Socialist Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	134	11.2%	0.11166667
2	Really dislike	160	13.3%	0.13333333
3	Dislike somewhat	205	17.1%	0.17083333
4	Neither dislike nor like	224	18.7%	0.18666667
5	Like somewhat	258	21.5%	0.21500000
6	Really like	175	14.6%	0.14583333
7	Intensely like	44	3.7%	0.03666667
98		8797		NA

r25_pcldsp

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Centre Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Centre Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	175	14.6%	0.145954962
2	Really dislike	227	18.9%	0.189324437
3	Dislike somewhat	257	21.4%	0.214345288
4	Neither dislike nor like	271	22.6%	0.226021685
5	Like somewhat	201	16.8%	0.167639700
6	Really like	60	5.0%	0.050041701
7	Intensely like	8	0.7%	0.006672227
98		8798		NA

r25_pcldm

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Green Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Green Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	230	19.2%	0.19214703
2	Really dislike	171	14.3%	0.14285714
3	Dislike somewhat	194	16.2%	0.16207185
4	Neither dislike nor like	177	14.8%	0.14786967
5	Like somewhat	262	21.9%	0.21888053
6	Really like	130	10.9%	0.10860485
7	Intensely like	33	2.8%	0.02756892
98		8800		NA

r25_pclda

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Labour Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Labour Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	109	9.1%	0.09083333
2	Really dislike	125	10.4%	0.10416667
3	Dislike somewhat	209	17.4%	0.17416667
4	Neither dislike nor like	139	11.6%	0.11583333
5	Like somewhat	358	29.8%	0.29833333
6	Really like	236	19.7%	0.19666667
7	Intensely like	24	2.0%	0.02000000
98		8797		NA

r25_pcldr

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Red Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Red Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	194	16.2%	0.16193656
2	Really dislike	193	16.1%	0.16110184
3	Dislike somewhat	191	15.9%	0.15943239
4	Neither dislike nor like	188	15.7%	0.15692821
5	Like somewhat	254	21.2%	0.21202003
6	Really like	139	11.6%	0.11602671
7	Intensely like	39	3.3%	0.03255426
98		8799		NA

r26_pcldpk

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Christian Democratic Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	849	14.9%	0.149340369
2	Really dislike	1087	19.1%	0.191204925
3	Dislike somewhat	1360	23.9%	0.239226033
4	Neither dislike nor like	1380	24.3%	0.242744063
5	Like somewhat	706	12.4%	0.124186456
6	Really like	209	3.7%	0.036763412
7	Intensely like	41	0.7%	0.007211961
97	Not answered	53	0.9%	0.009322779
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r26_pcldph

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Conservative Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	294	5.2%	0.051715040
2	Really dislike	707	12.4%	0.124362357
3	Dislike somewhat	982	17.3%	0.172735268
4	Neither dislike nor like	743	13.1%	0.130694811
5	Like somewhat	1403	24.7%	0.246789798
6	Really like	1137	20.0%	0.200000000
7	Intensely like	365	6.4%	0.064204046
97	Not answered	54	0.9%	0.009498681
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r26_pcldpf

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Progress Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Progress Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	1645	28.9%	0.28935796
2	Really dislike	1153	20.3%	0.20281442
3	Dislike somewhat	840	14.8%	0.14775726
4	Neither dislike nor like	616	10.8%	0.10835532
5	Like somewhat	816	14.4%	0.14353562
6	Really like	432	7.6%	0.07598945
7	Intensely like	136	2.4%	0.02392260
97	Not answered	47	0.8%	0.00826737
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r26_pcldpv

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Liberal Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	443	7.8%	0.07792436
2	Really dislike	738	13.0%	0.12981530
3	Dislike somewhat	1225	21.5%	0.21547933
4	Neither dislike nor like	1543	27.1%	0.27141601
5	Like somewhat	1230	21.6%	0.21635884
6	Really like	369	6.5%	0.06490765
7	Intensely like	72	1.3%	0.01266491
97	Not answered	65	1.1%	0.01143360
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r26_pcldpsv

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Socialist Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Socialist Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	642	11.3%	0.11292876
2	Really dislike	912	16.0%	0.16042216
3	Dislike somewhat	1026	18.0%	0.18047493
4	Neither dislike nor like	905	15.9%	0.15919085
5	Like somewhat	1148	20.2%	0.20193492
6	Really like	805	14.2%	0.14160070
7	Intensely like	184	3.2%	0.03236588
97	Not answered	63	1.1%	0.01108179
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r26_pcldpsp

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Centre Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Centre Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	772	13.6%	0.135795954
2	Really dislike	1195	21.0%	0.210202287
3	Dislike somewhat	1435	25.2%	0.252418646
4	Neither dislike nor like	1164	20.5%	0.204749340
5	Like somewhat	803	14.1%	0.141248901
6	Really like	222	3.9%	0.039050132
7	Intensely like	39	0.7%	0.006860158
97	Not answered	55	1.0%	0.009674582
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r26_pcldpm

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Green Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Green Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	1159	20.4%	0.20386983
2	Really dislike	864	15.2%	0.15197889
3	Dislike somewhat	997	17.5%	0.17537379
4	Neither dislike nor like	887	15.6%	0.15602463
5	Like somewhat	1124	19.8%	0.19771328
6	Really like	481	8.5%	0.08460862
7	Intensely like	114	2.0%	0.02005277
97	Not answered	59	1.0%	0.01037819
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r26_pcldpa

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Labour Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Labour Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	532	9.4%	0.093579595
2	Really dislike	705	12.4%	0.124010554
3	Dislike somewhat	1128	19.8%	0.198416887
4	Neither dislike nor like	808	14.2%	0.142128408
5	Like somewhat	1602	28.2%	0.281794195
6	Really like	734	12.9%	0.129111697
7	Intensely like	130	2.3%	0.022867194
97	Not answered	46	0.8%	0.008091469
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r26_pcldpr

Variable label:	Like or dislike party: The Red Party
Pre-question text:	We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question:	The Red Party
Post-question:	Click on your desired answer
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	1246	21.9%	0.219173263
2	Really dislike	952	16.7%	0.167458223
3	Dislike somewhat	941	16.6%	0.165523307
4	Neither dislike nor like	827	14.5%	0.145470536
5	Like somewhat	1036	18.2%	0.182233949
6	Really like	479	8.4%	0.084256816
7	Intensely like	155	2.7%	0.027264732
97	Not answered	49	0.9%	0.008619173
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r11bktivi_1

Variable label:	Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
Technical description:	[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	107	2.8%	0.028359396
2	2 - Does not resemble me	328	8.7%	0.086933475
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	710	18.8%	0.188179168
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	1405	37.2%	0.372382719
5	5 - Resembles me	906	24.0%	0.240127220
6	6 - Very much resembles me	285	7.6%	0.075536708
97	Not answered	32	0.8%	0.008481315
98	Not asked	6224		NA

r11bktivi_2

Variable label:	Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
Technical description:	[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	1875	49.7%	0.49695203
2	2 - Does not resemble me	772	20.5%	0.20461171
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	515	13.6%	0.13649616
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	355	9.4%	0.09408958
5	5 - Resembles me	169	4.5%	0.04479194
6	6 - Very much resembles me	59	1.6%	0.01563742
97	Not answered	28	0.7%	0.00742115
98	Not asked	6224		NA

r11bktivi_3

Variable label:	Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her]. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
Technical description:	[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	12	0.3%	0.003180493
2	2 - Does not resemble me	42	1.1%	0.011131725
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	243	6.4%	0.064404983
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	1440	38.2%	0.381659157
5	5 - Resembles me	1423	37.7%	0.377153459
6	6 - Very much resembles me	585	15.5%	0.155049033
97	Not answered	28	0.7%	0.007421150
98	Not asked	6224		NA

r11bktivi_4

Variable label:	Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
Technical description:	[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	37	1.0%	0.009806520
2	2 - Does not resemble me	102	2.7%	0.027034190
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	254	6.7%	0.067320435
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	1026	27.2%	0.271932149
5	5 - Resembles me	1444	38.3%	0.382719321
6	6 - Very much resembles me	887	23.5%	0.235091439
97	Not answered	23	0.6%	0.006095945
98	Not asked	6224		NA

r11bktivi_5

Variable label:	Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
Technical description:	[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	15	0.4%	0.003975616
2	2 - Does not resemble me	64	1.7%	0.016962629
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	278	7.4%	0.073681421
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	1320	35.0%	0.349854227
5	5 - Resembles me	1336	35.4%	0.354094885
6	6 - Very much resembles me	736	19.5%	0.195070236
97	Not answered	24	0.6%	0.006360986
98	Not asked	6224		NA

r11bktivi_6

Variable label:	Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
Technical description:	[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	359	9.5%	0.095149748
2	2 - Does not resemble me	804	21.3%	0.213093029
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	1302	34.5%	0.345083488
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	947	25.1%	0.250993904
5	5 - Resembles me	271	7.2%	0.071826133
6	6 - Very much resembles me	68	1.8%	0.018022794
97	Not answered	22	0.6%	0.005830904
98	Not asked	6224		NA

r11bktivi_7

Variable label:	Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
Technical description:	[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	135	3.6%	0.035780546
2	2 - Does not resemble me	464	12.3%	0.122979062
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	1144	30.3%	0.303206997
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	1443	38.2%	0.382454280
5	5 - Resembles me	459	12.2%	0.121653856
6	6 - Very much resembles me	102	2.7%	0.027034190
97	Not answered	26	0.7%	0.006891068
98	Not asked	6224		NA

r11bktivi_8

Variable label:	Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
Technical description:	[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	413	10.9%	0.109461967
2	2 - Does not resemble me	852	22.6%	0.225815001
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	1236	32.8%	0.327590777
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	918	24.3%	0.243307713
5	5 - Resembles me	277	7.3%	0.073416380
6	6 - Very much resembles me	52	1.4%	0.013782136
97	Not answered	25	0.7%	0.006626027
98	Not asked	6224		NA

r11bktivi_9

Variable label:	Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
Technical description:	[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	399	10.6%	0.105751391
2	2 - Does not resemble me	741	19.6%	0.196395441
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	1264	33.5%	0.335011927
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	1024	27.1%	0.271402067
5	5 - Resembles me	274	7.3%	0.072621256
6	6 - Very much resembles me	44	1.2%	0.011661808
97	Not answered	27	0.7%	0.007156109
98	Not asked	6224		NA

r11bktivi_10

Variable label:	Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
Technical description:	[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	67	1.8%	0.017757752
2	2 - Does not resemble me	195	5.2%	0.051683011
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	542	14.4%	0.143652266
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	1391	36.9%	0.368672144
5	5 - Resembles me	1047	27.7%	0.277498012
6	6 - Very much resembles me	511	13.5%	0.135435993
97	Not answered	20	0.5%	0.005300822
98	Not asked	6224		NA

r17bktivi_1

Variable label:	Resembles you: Respect for parents and for older people is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question:	[He/She] believes that [he/she] should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
Post-question:	For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16] [Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	86	3.8%	0.037669733
2	2 - Does not resemble me	234	10.2%	0.102496715
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	436	19.1%	0.190976785
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	877	38.4%	0.384143671
5	5 - Resembles me	456	20.0%	0.199737188
6	6 - Very much resembles me	177	7.8%	0.077529566
97	Not answered	17	0.7%	0.007446343
98	Not asked	7714		NA

r17bktivi_2

Variable label:	Resembles you: Religious faith is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question:	Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
Post-question:	For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16] [Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	1277	55.9%	0.559351730
2	2 - Does not resemble me	410	18.0%	0.179588261
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	259	11.3%	0.113447219
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	210	9.2%	0.091984231
5	5 - Resembles me	68	3.0%	0.029785370
6	6 - Very much resembles me	45	2.0%	0.019710907
97	Not answered	14	0.6%	0.006132282
98	Not asked	7714		NA

r17bktivi_3

Variable label:	Resembles you: To help people around you is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question:	It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
Post-question:	For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16] [Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	4	0.2%	0.001752081
2	2 - Does not resemble me	29	1.3%	0.012702584
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	121	5.3%	0.053000438
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	855	37.5%	0.374507227
5	5 - Resembles me	865	37.9%	0.378887429
6	6 - Very much resembles me	395	17.3%	0.173017959
97	Not answered	14	0.6%	0.006132282
98	Not asked	7714		NA

r17bktivi_4

Variable label:	Resembles you: To have all people in the world be treated equally is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question:	[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
Post-question:	For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16] [Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	12	0.5%	0.005256242
2	2 - Does not resemble me	55	2.4%	0.024091108
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	126	5.5%	0.055190539
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	608	26.6%	0.266316251
5	5 - Resembles me	847	37.1%	0.371003066
6	6 - Very much resembles me	624	27.3%	0.273324573
97	Not answered	11	0.5%	0.004818222
98	Not asked	7714		NA

r17bktivi_5

Variable label:	Resembles you: To be interested in things and to be curious is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question:	[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
Post-question:	For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16] [Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	8	0.4%	0.003504161
2	2 - Does not resemble me	44	1.9%	0.019272887
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	205	9.0%	0.089794131
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	725	31.8%	0.317564608
5	5 - Resembles me	793	34.7%	0.347349978
6	6 - Very much resembles me	495	21.7%	0.216819974
97	Not answered	13	0.6%	0.005694262
98	Not asked	7714		NA

r17bktivi_6

Variable label:	Resembles you: To take risks and look for new experiences is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question:	[He/She] likes to take risks. [He’s/she’s] always looking for new experiences.
Post-question:	For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16] [Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	235	10.3%	0.102934735
2	2 - Does not resemble me	525	23.0%	0.229960578
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	778	34.1%	0.340779676
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	557	24.4%	0.243977223
5	5 - Resembles me	141	6.2%	0.061760841
6	6 - Very much resembles me	35	1.5%	0.015330705
97	Not answered	12	0.5%	0.005256242
98	Not asked	7714		NA

r17bktivi_7

Variable label:	Resembles you: To seek out opportunites to have fun is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question:	[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
Post-question:	For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16] [Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	92	4.0%	0.040297854
2	2 - Does not resemble me	293	12.8%	0.128339904
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	721	31.6%	0.315812527
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	826	36.2%	0.361804643
5	5 - Resembles me	258	11.3%	0.113009198
6	6 - Very much resembles me	76	3.3%	0.033289531
97	Not answered	17	0.7%	0.007446343
98	Not asked	7714		NA

r17bktivi_8

Variable label:	Resembles you: To be sucessful and to impress other people is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question:	It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
Post-question:	For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16] [Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	274	12.0%	0.120017521
2	2 - Does not resemble me	494	21.6%	0.216381954
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	821	36.0%	0.359614542
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	472	20.7%	0.206745510
5	5 - Resembles me	170	7.4%	0.074463425
6	6 - Very much resembles me	40	1.8%	0.017520806
97	Not answered	12	0.5%	0.005256242
98	Not asked	7714		NA

r17bktivi_9

Variable label:	Resembles you: To take the lead and tell others what to do is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question:	It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
Post-question:	For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16] [Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	266	11.7%	0.116513360
2	2 - Does not resemble me	489	21.4%	0.214191853
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	719	31.5%	0.314936487
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	622	27.2%	0.272448533
5	5 - Resembles me	146	6.4%	0.063950942
6	6 - Very much resembles me	27	1.2%	0.011826544
97	Not answered	14	0.6%	0.006132282
98	Not asked	7714		NA

r17bktivi_10

Variable label:	Resembles you: To have things tidy and clean is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question:	It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
Post-question:	For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16] [Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Does not resemble me at all	33	1.4%	0.014454665
2	2 - Does not resemble me	131	5.7%	0.057380640
3	3 - Slightly resembles me	338	14.8%	0.148050810
4	4 - Somewhat resembles me	834	36.5%	0.365308804
5	5 - Resembles me	622	27.2%	0.272448533
6	6 - Very much resembles me	310	13.6%	0.135786246
97	Not answered	15	0.7%	0.006570302
98	Not asked	7714		NA

r21bktivi_1

Variable label:	Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for his parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 18] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	31	5.2%	0.05175292
5	5 Resembles me	110	18.4%	0.18363940
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	248	41.4%	0.41402337
3	3 Slightly resembles me	125	20.9%	0.20868114
2	2 Does not resemble me	53	8.8%	0.08848080
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	25	4.2%	0.04173623
97	Not answered	7	1.2%	0.01168614
98	Not asked	9398		NA

r21bktivi_2

Variable label:	Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 18] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	6	1.0%	0.01001669
5	5 Resembles me	16	2.7%	0.02671119
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	55	9.2%	0.09181970
3	3 Slightly resembles me	86	14.4%	0.14357262
2	2 Does not resemble me	114	19.0%	0.19031720
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	315	52.6%	0.52587646
97	Not answered	7	1.2%	0.01168614
98	Not asked	9398		NA

r21bktivi_3

Variable label:	Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 18] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	85	14.2%	0.141903172
5	5 Resembles me	240	40.1%	0.400667780
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	220	36.7%	0.367278798
3	3 Slightly resembles me	41	6.8%	0.068447412
2	2 Does not resemble me	3	0.5%	0.005008347
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	0	0.0%	0.000000000
97	Not answered	10	1.7%	0.016694491
98	Not asked	9398		NA

r21bktivi_4

Variable label:	Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 18] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	156	26.0%	0.260434057
5	5 Resembles me	228	38.1%	0.380634391
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	170	28.4%	0.283806344
3	3 Slightly resembles me	31	5.2%	0.051752922
2	2 Does not resemble me	6	1.0%	0.010016694
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	1	0.2%	0.001669449
97	Not answered	7	1.2%	0.011686144
98	Not asked	9398		NA

r21bktivi_5

Variable label:	Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 18] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	124	20.7%	0.207011686
5	5 Resembles me	201	33.6%	0.335559265
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	200	33.4%	0.333889816
3	3 Slightly resembles me	47	7.8%	0.078464107
2	2 Does not resemble me	18	3.0%	0.030050083
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	1	0.2%	0.001669449
97	Not answered	8	1.3%	0.013355593
98	Not asked	9398		NA

r21bktivi_6

Variable label:	Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 18] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	17	2.8%	0.02838063
5	5 Resembles me	42	7.0%	0.07011686
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	146	24.4%	0.24373957
3	3 Slightly resembles me	203	33.9%	0.33889816
2	2 Does not resemble me	127	21.2%	0.21202003
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	55	9.2%	0.09181970
97	Not answered	9	1.5%	0.01502504
98	Not asked	9398		NA

r21bktivi_7

Variable label:	Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for him to do things that give him pleasure.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 18] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	15	2.5%	0.02504174
5	5 Resembles me	72	12.0%	0.12020033
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	211	35.2%	0.35225376
3	3 Slightly resembles me	201	33.6%	0.33555927
2	2 Does not resemble me	66	11.0%	0.11018364
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	27	4.5%	0.04507513
97	Not answered	7	1.2%	0.01168614
98	Not asked	9398		NA

r21bktivi_8

Variable label:	Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 18] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	7	1.2%	0.01168614
5	5 Resembles me	55	9.2%	0.09181970
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	147	24.5%	0.24540902
3	3 Slightly resembles me	213	35.6%	0.35559265
2	2 Does not resemble me	115	19.2%	0.19198664
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	55	9.2%	0.09181970
97	Not answered	7	1.2%	0.01168614
98	Not asked	9398		NA

r21bktivi_9

Variable label:	Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It is important for him to take the lead and tell others what to do. He wants people to do as he says.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 18] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	3	0.5%	0.005008347
5	5 Resembles me	39	6.5%	0.065108514
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	172	28.7%	0.287145242
3	3 Slightly resembles me	193	32.2%	0.322203673
2	2 Does not resemble me	116	19.4%	0.193656093
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	68	11.4%	0.113522538
97	Not answered	8	1.3%	0.013355593
98	Not asked	9398		NA

r21bktivi_10

Variable label:	Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 18] [Answer list display order: Randomize] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	83	13.9%	0.13856427
5	5 Resembles me	146	24.4%	0.24373957
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	214	35.7%	0.35726210
3	3 Slightly resembles me	91	15.2%	0.15191987
2	2 Does not resemble me	46	7.7%	0.07679466
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	11	1.8%	0.01836394
97	Not answered	8	1.3%	0.01335559
98	Not asked	9398		NA

r22bktivi_1

Variable label:	Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	98	7.6%	0.076264591
5	5 Resembles me	278	21.6%	0.216342412
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	486	37.8%	0.378210117
3	3 Slightly resembles me	232	18.1%	0.180544747
2	2 Does not resemble me	128	10.0%	0.099610895
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	55	4.3%	0.042801556
97	Not answered	8	0.6%	0.006225681
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r22bktivi_2

Variable label:	Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	30	2.3%	0.023346304
5	5 Resembles me	48	3.7%	0.037354086
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	102	7.9%	0.079377432
3	3 Slightly resembles me	153	11.9%	0.119066148
2	2 Does not resemble me	255	19.8%	0.198443580
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	690	53.7%	0.536964981
97	Not answered	7	0.5%	0.005447471
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r22bktivi_3

Variable label:	Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her]. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	273	21.2%	0.2124513619
5	5 Resembles me	499	38.8%	0.3883268482
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	422	32.8%	0.3284046693
3	3 Slightly resembles me	65	5.1%	0.0505836576
2	2 Does not resemble me	13	1.0%	0.0101167315
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	1	0.1%	0.0007782101
97	Not answered	12	0.9%	0.0093385214
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r22bktivi_4

Variable label:	Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	383	29.8%	0.298054475
5	5 Resembles me	451	35.1%	0.350972763
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	334	26.0%	0.259922179
3	3 Slightly resembles me	75	5.8%	0.058365759
2	2 Does not resemble me	25	1.9%	0.019455253
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	10	0.8%	0.007782101
97	Not answered	7	0.5%	0.005447471
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r22bktivi_5

Variable label:	Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	296	23.0%	0.230350195
5	5 Resembles me	438	34.1%	0.340856031
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	430	33.5%	0.334630350
3	3 Slightly resembles me	88	6.8%	0.068482490
2	2 Does not resemble me	18	1.4%	0.014007782
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	5	0.4%	0.003891051
97	Not answered	10	0.8%	0.007782101
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r22bktivi_6

Variable label:	Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	22	1.7%	0.01712062
5	5 Resembles me	106	8.2%	0.08249027
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	337	26.2%	0.26225681
3	3 Slightly resembles me	421	32.8%	0.32762646
2	2 Does not resemble me	252	19.6%	0.19610895
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	134	10.4%	0.10428016
97	Not answered	13	1.0%	0.01011673
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r22bktivi_7

Variable label:	Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	48	3.7%	0.037354086
5	5 Resembles me	163	12.7%	0.126848249
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	449	34.9%	0.349416342
3	3 Slightly resembles me	394	30.7%	0.306614786
2	2 Does not resemble me	170	13.2%	0.132295720
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	53	4.1%	0.041245136
97	Not answered	8	0.6%	0.006225681
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r22bktivi_8

Variable label:	Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	38	3.0%	0.029571984
5	5 Resembles me	95	7.4%	0.073929961
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	344	26.8%	0.267704280
3	3 Slightly resembles me	419	32.6%	0.326070039
2	2 Does not resemble me	237	18.4%	0.184435798
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	146	11.4%	0.113618677
97	Not answered	6	0.5%	0.004669261
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r22bktivi_9

Variable label:	Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	7	0.5%	0.005447471
5	5 Resembles me	73	5.7%	0.056809339
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	303	23.6%	0.235797665
3	3 Slightly resembles me	407	31.7%	0.316731518
2	2 Does not resemble me	315	24.5%	0.245136187
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	171	13.3%	0.133073930
97	Not answered	9	0.7%	0.007003891
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r22bktivi_10

Variable label:	Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized] [The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	210	16.3%	0.163424125
5	5 Resembles me	392	30.5%	0.305058366
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	411	32.0%	0.319844358
3	3 Slightly resembles me	178	13.9%	0.138521401
2	2 Does not resemble me	72	5.6%	0.056031128
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	16	1.2%	0.012451362
97	Not answered	6	0.5%	0.004669261
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r25_bgtiv_1

Variable label:	Resembles you: Respect for parents and for older people is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] believes that [he/she] should always show respect for [him/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [his/hers] to be obedient.
Technical description:	[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	84	6.9%	0.06947891
5	5 Resembles me	269	22.2%	0.22249793
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	432	35.7%	0.35732010
3	3 Slightly resembles me	244	20.2%	0.20181969
2	2 Does not resemble me	118	9.8%	0.09760132
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	47	3.9%	0.03887510
97	Not answered	15	1.2%	0.01240695
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r25_bgtiv_2

Variable label:	Resembles you: Religious faith is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [him/her] religion requires.
Technical description:	[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	22	1.8%	0.01819686
5	5 Resembles me	38	3.1%	0.03143093
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	95	7.9%	0.07857734
3	3 Slightly resembles me	154	12.7%	0.12737800
2	2 Does not resemble me	228	18.9%	0.18858561
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	657	54.3%	0.54342432
97	Not answered	15	1.2%	0.01240695
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r25_bgtiv_3

Variable label:	Resembles you: To help people around you is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
Technical description:	[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	236	19.5%	0.195202647
5	5 Resembles me	445	36.8%	0.368072787
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	444	36.7%	0.367245658
3	3 Slightly resembles me	60	5.0%	0.049627792
2	2 Does not resemble me	9	0.7%	0.007444169
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	2	0.2%	0.001654260
97	Not answered	13	1.1%	0.010752688
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r25_bgtiv_4

Variable label:	Resembles you: To have all people in the world be treated equally is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
Technical description:	[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	325	26.9%	0.268817204
5	5 Resembles me	443	36.6%	0.366418528
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	322	26.6%	0.266335815
3	3 Slightly resembles me	69	5.7%	0.057071960
2	2 Does not resemble me	30	2.5%	0.024813896
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	6	0.5%	0.004962779
97	Not answered	14	1.2%	0.011579818
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r25_bgtiv_5

Variable label:	Resembles you: To be interested in things and to be curious is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
Technical description:	[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	257	21.3%	0.212572374
5	5 Resembles me	417	34.5%	0.344913151
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	388	32.1%	0.320926385
3	3 Slightly resembles me	104	8.6%	0.086021505
2	2 Does not resemble me	24	2.0%	0.019851117
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	5	0.4%	0.004135649
97	Not answered	14	1.2%	0.011579818
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r25_bgtiv_6

Variable label:	Resembles you: To take risks and look for new experiences is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
Technical description:	[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	25	2.1%	0.02067825
5	5 Resembles me	101	8.4%	0.08354012
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	261	21.6%	0.21588089
3	3 Slightly resembles me	426	35.2%	0.35235732
2	2 Does not resemble me	265	21.9%	0.21918941
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	115	9.5%	0.09511993
97	Not answered	16	1.3%	0.01323408
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r25_bgtiv_7

Variable label:	Resembles you: To seek out opportunites to have fun is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [his/hers] to do things that give [his/hers] pleasure.
Technical description:	[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	46	3.8%	0.03804797
5	5 Resembles me	155	12.8%	0.12820513
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	476	39.4%	0.39371381
3	3 Slightly resembles me	344	28.5%	0.28453267
2	2 Does not resemble me	133	11.0%	0.11000827
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	41	3.4%	0.03391232
97	Not answered	14	1.2%	0.01157982
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r25_bgtiv_8

Variable label:	Resembles you: To be sucessful and to impress other people is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
Technical description:	[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	26	2.2%	0.02150538
5	5 Resembles me	106	8.8%	0.08767577
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	353	29.2%	0.29197684
3	3 Slightly resembles me	373	30.9%	0.30851944
2	2 Does not resemble me	234	19.4%	0.19354839
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	101	8.4%	0.08354012
97	Not answered	16	1.3%	0.01323408
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r25_bgtiv_9

Variable label:	Resembles you: To take the lead and tell others what to do is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
Technical description:	[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	14	1.2%	0.01157982
5	5 Resembles me	66	5.5%	0.05459057
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	296	24.5%	0.24483044
3	3 Slightly resembles me	381	31.5%	0.31513648
2	2 Does not resemble me	286	23.7%	0.23655914
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	152	12.6%	0.12572374
97	Not answered	14	1.2%	0.01157982
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r25_bgtiv_10

Variable label:	Resembles you: To have things tidy and clean is important
Pre-question text:	Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question:	It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
Technical description:	[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
6	6 Very much resembles me	180	14.9%	0.14888337
5	5 Resembles me	352	29.1%	0.29114971
4	4 Somewhat resembles me	420	34.7%	0.34739454
3	3 Slightly resembles me	165	13.6%	0.13647643
2	2 Does not resemble me	60	5.0%	0.04962779
1	1 Does not resemble me at all	15	1.2%	0.01240695
97	Not answered	17	1.4%	0.01406121
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r15bfi10_1

Variable label:	Describes you how well: Reserved.
Pre-question text:	How well does the following statement describe your personality? I see myself as someone who …
Literal question:	… is reserved
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	767	18.0%	0.18004695
2	Disagree a little	1029	24.2%	0.24154930
3	Neither agree nor disagree	651	15.3%	0.15281690
4	Agree a little	1466	34.4%	0.34413146
5	Agree strongly	265	6.2%	0.06220657
97	Not answered	82	1.9%	0.01924883
98	Not asked	5737		NA

r15bfi10_2

Variable label:	Describes you how well: Generally trusting.
Pre-question text:	How well does the following statement describe your personality? I see myself as someone who …
Literal question:	… is generally trusting
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	84	2.0%	0.01971831
2	Disagree a little	362	8.5%	0.08497653
3	Neither agree nor disagree	498	11.7%	0.11690141
4	Agree a little	2067	48.5%	0.48521127
5	Agree strongly	1184	27.8%	0.27793427
97	Not answered	65	1.5%	0.01525822
98	Not asked	5737		NA

r15bfi10_3

Variable label:	Describes you how well: Tendency to be lazy.
Pre-question text:	How well does the following statement describe your personality? I see myself as someone who …
Literal question:	… tend to be lazy
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	1401	32.9%	0.32887324
2	Disagree a little	1184	27.8%	0.27793427
3	Neither agree nor disagree	694	16.3%	0.16291080
4	Agree a little	789	18.5%	0.18521127
5	Agree strongly	130	3.1%	0.03051643
97	Not answered	62	1.5%	0.01455399
98	Not asked	5737		NA

r15bfi10_4

Variable label:	Describes you how well: Relaxed, handles stress well.
Pre-question text:	How well does the following statement describe your personality? I see myself as someone who …
Literal question:	… is relaxed, handles stress well
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely disagree	166	3.9%	0.03896714
2	Disagree somewhat	799	18.8%	0.18755869
3	Neither agree nor disagree	685	16.1%	0.16079812
4	Agree somewhat	1754	41.2%	0.41173709
5	Completely agree	794	18.6%	0.18638498
97	Not answered	62	1.5%	0.01455399
98	Not asked	5737		NA

r15bfi10_5

Variable label:	Describes you how well: Few artistic interests.
Pre-question text:	How well does the following statement describe your personality? I see myself as someone who …
Literal question:	… has few artistic interests
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely disagree	1234	29.0%	0.28967136
2	Disagree somewhat	1348	31.6%	0.31643192
3	Neither agree nor disagree	654	15.4%	0.15352113
4	Agree somewhat	750	17.6%	0.17605634
5	Completely agree	209	4.9%	0.04906103
97	Not answered	65	1.5%	0.01525822
98	Not asked	5737		NA

r15bfi10_6

Variable label:	Describes you how well: Outgoing, sociable.
Pre-question text:	How well does the following statement describe your personality? I see myself as someone who …
Literal question:	… is outgoing, sociable
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely disagree	179	4.2%	0.04201878
2	Disagree somewhat	694	16.3%	0.16291080
3	Neither agree nor disagree	680	16.0%	0.15962441
4	Agree somewhat	1573	36.9%	0.36924883
5	Completely agree	1075	25.2%	0.25234742
97	Not answered	59	1.4%	0.01384977
98	Not asked	5737		NA

r15bfi10_7

Variable label:	Describes you how well: Tends to find fault with others.
Pre-question text:	How well does the following statement describe your personality? I see myself as someone who …
Literal question:	… tends to find fault with others
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely disagree	692	16.2%	0.16244131
2	Disagree somewhat	1279	30.0%	0.30023474
3	Neither agree nor disagree	1187	27.9%	0.27863850
4	Agree somewhat	954	22.4%	0.22394366
5	Completely agree	92	2.2%	0.02159624
97	Not answered	56	1.3%	0.01314554
98	Not asked	5737		NA

r15bfi10_8

Variable label:	Describes you how well: Does a thorough job.
Pre-question text:	How well does the following statement describe your personality? I see myself as someone who …
Literal question:	… do a thorough job
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely disagree	55	1.3%	0.01291080
2	Disagree somewhat	86	2.0%	0.02018779
3	Neither agree nor disagree	375	8.8%	0.08802817
4	Agree somewhat	1824	42.8%	0.42816901
5	Completely agree	1866	43.8%	0.43802817
97	Not answered	54	1.3%	0.01267606
98	Not asked	5737		NA

r15bfi10_9

Variable label:	Describes you how well: Easily nervous.
Pre-question text:	How well does the following statement describe your personality? I see myself as someone who …
Literal question:	… get nervous easily
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely disagree	1299	30.5%	0.30492958
2	Disagree somewhat	1281	30.1%	0.30070423
3	Neither agree nor disagree	731	17.2%	0.17159624
4	Agree somewhat	721	16.9%	0.16924883
5	Completely agree	168	3.9%	0.03943662
97	Not answered	60	1.4%	0.01408451
98	Not asked	5737		NA

r15bfi10_10

Variable label:	Describes you how well: Active imagination.
Pre-question text:	How well does the following statement describe your personality? I see myself as someone who …
Literal question:	… has an active imagination
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	252	5.9%	0.05915493
2	Disagree a little	608	14.3%	0.14272300
3	Neither agree nor disagree	1072	25.2%	0.25164319
4	Agree a little	1445	33.9%	0.33920188
5	Agree strongly	826	19.4%	0.19389671
97	Not answered	57	1.3%	0.01338028
98	Not asked	5737		NA

r16bfi10_1

Variable label:	I see myself as: Reserved
Pre-question text:	How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question:	…is reserved
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	355	19.9%	0.19887955
2	Disagree a little	423	23.7%	0.23697479
3	Neither agree nor disagree	301	16.9%	0.16862745
4	Agree a little	551	30.9%	0.30868347
5	Agree strongly	115	6.4%	0.06442577
97	Not answered	40	2.2%	0.02240896
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r16bfi10_2

Variable label:	I see myself as: Generally trusting
Pre-question text:	How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question:	…is generally trusting
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	48	2.7%	0.02689076
2	Disagree a little	146	8.2%	0.08179272
3	Neither agree nor disagree	193	10.8%	0.10812325
4	Agree a little	830	46.5%	0.46498599
5	Agree strongly	544	30.5%	0.30476190
97	Not answered	24	1.3%	0.01344538
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r16bfi10_3

Variable label:	I see myself as: Tends to be lazy
Pre-question text:	How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question:	…tends to be lazy
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	658	36.9%	0.36862745
2	Disagree a little	471	26.4%	0.26386555
3	Neither agree nor disagree	282	15.8%	0.15798319
4	Agree a little	282	15.8%	0.15798319
5	Agree strongly	68	3.8%	0.03809524
97	Not answered	24	1.3%	0.01344538
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r16bfi10_4

Variable label:	I see myself as: Relaxed, handles stress well
Pre-question text:	How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question:	… is relaxed, handles stress well
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	66	3.7%	0.03697479
2	Disagree a little	296	16.6%	0.16582633
3	Neither agree nor disagree	277	15.5%	0.15518207
4	Agree a little	734	41.1%	0.41120448
5	Agree strongly	390	21.8%	0.21848739
97	Not answered	22	1.2%	0.01232493
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r16bfi10_5

Variable label:	I see myself as: Has few artistic interests
Pre-question text:	How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question:	… has few artistic interests
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	538	30.1%	0.30140056
2	Disagree a little	533	29.9%	0.29859944
3	Neither agree nor disagree	277	15.5%	0.15518207
4	Agree a little	297	16.6%	0.16638655
5	Agree strongly	115	6.4%	0.06442577
97	Not answered	25	1.4%	0.01400560
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r16bfi10_6

Variable label:	I see myself as: Outgoing, sociable
Pre-question text:	How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question:	… is outgoing, sociable
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	84	4.7%	0.04705882
2	Disagree a little	251	14.1%	0.14061625
3	Neither agree nor disagree	282	15.8%	0.15798319
4	Agree a little	639	35.8%	0.35798319
5	Agree strongly	511	28.6%	0.28627451
97	Not answered	18	1.0%	0.01008403
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r16bfi10_7

Variable label:	I see myself as: Tends to find fault with others
Pre-question text:	How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question:	… tends to find fault with others
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	309	17.3%	0.17310924
2	Disagree a little	518	29.0%	0.29019608
3	Neither agree nor disagree	530	29.7%	0.29691877
4	Agree a little	343	19.2%	0.19215686
5	Agree strongly	62	3.5%	0.03473389
97	Not answered	23	1.3%	0.01288515
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r16bfi10_8

Variable label:	I see myself as: Does a thorough job
Pre-question text:	How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question:	… does a thorough job
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	27	1.5%	0.01512605
2	Disagree a little	33	1.8%	0.01848739
3	Neither agree nor disagree	134	7.5%	0.07507003
4	Agree a little	663	37.1%	0.37142857
5	Agree strongly	907	50.8%	0.50812325
97	Not answered	21	1.2%	0.01176471
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r16bfi10_9

Variable label:	I see myself as: Get nervous easily
Pre-question text:	How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question:	… get nervous easily
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	556	31.1%	0.31148459
2	Disagree a little	500	28.0%	0.28011204
3	Neither agree nor disagree	320	17.9%	0.17927171
4	Agree a little	319	17.9%	0.17871148
5	Agree strongly	67	3.8%	0.03753501
97	Not answered	23	1.3%	0.01288515
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r16bfi10_10

Variable label:	I see myself as: Has an active imagination
Pre-question text:	How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question:	… has an active imagination
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree strongly	140	7.8%	0.07843137
2	Disagree a little	223	12.5%	0.12492997
3	Neither agree nor disagree	440	24.6%	0.24649860
4	Agree a little	598	33.5%	0.33501401
5	Agree strongly	358	20.1%	0.20056022
97	Not answered	26	1.5%	0.01456583
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r17sdo7_1

Variable label:	Assertion: Ideally some groups in society should be on top and others on the bottom
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question:	An ideal society requires some groups to be on top and others to be on the bottom
Post-question:	You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Strongly oppose	1189	32.0%	0.320226232
2	2 - Somewhat oppose	703	18.9%	0.189334770
3	3 - Slightly oppose	483	13.0%	0.130083490
4	4 - Neutral	464	12.5%	0.124966335
5	5 - Slightly favor	470	12.7%	0.126582278
6	6 - Somewhat favor	315	8.5%	0.084837059
7	7 - Strongly favor	70	1.9%	0.018852680
97	Not answered	19	0.5%	0.005117156
98	Not asked	6284		NA

r17sdo7_2

Variable label:	Assertion: Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question:	Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups.
Post-question:	You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Strongly oppose	2271	61.2%	0.611634797
2	2 - Somewhat oppose	445	12.0%	0.119849179
3	3 - Slightly oppose	204	5.5%	0.054942095
4	4 - Neutral	389	10.5%	0.104767035
5	5 - Slightly favor	245	6.6%	0.065984379
6	6 - Somewhat favor	120	3.2%	0.032318880
7	7 - Strongly favor	17	0.5%	0.004578508
97	Not answered	22	0.6%	0.005925128
98	Not asked	6284		NA

r17sdo7_3

Variable label:	Assertion: No one group should dominate in society
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question:	No one group should dominate in society.
Post-question:	You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Strongly oppose	274	7.4%	0.073794775
2	2 - Somewhat oppose	205	5.5%	0.055211419
3	3 - Slightly oppose	236	6.4%	0.063560463
4	4 - Neutral	367	9.9%	0.098841907
5	5 - Slightly favor	336	9.0%	0.090492863
6	6 - Somewhat favor	694	18.7%	0.186910854
7	7 - Strongly favor	1577	42.5%	0.424723943
97	Not answered	24	0.6%	0.006463776
98	Not asked	6284		NA

r17sdo7_4

Variable label:	Assertion: Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question:	Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top.
Post-question:	You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Strongly oppose	158	4.3%	0.042553191
2	2 - Somewhat oppose	297	8.0%	0.079989227
3	3 - Slightly oppose	376	10.1%	0.101265823
4	4 - Neutral	509	13.7%	0.137085914
5	5 - Slightly favor	390	10.5%	0.105036359
6	6 - Somewhat favor	771	20.8%	0.207648802
7	7 - Strongly favor	1176	31.7%	0.316725020
97	Not answered	36	1.0%	0.009695664
98	Not asked	6284		NA

r17sdo7_5

Variable label:	Assertion: Equality between groups should not be our main goal
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question:	Equality between groups should not be our main goal.
Post-question:	You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Strongly oppose	814	21.9%	0.21922973
2	2 - Somewhat oppose	765	20.6%	0.20603286
3	3 - Slightly oppose	416	11.2%	0.11203878
4	4 - Neutral	620	16.7%	0.16698088
5	5 - Slightly favor	514	13.8%	0.13843253
6	6 - Somewhat favor	371	10.0%	0.09991920
7	7 - Strongly favor	178	4.8%	0.04793967
97	Not answered	35	0.9%	0.00942634
98	Not asked	6284		NA

r17sdo7_6

Variable label:	Assertion: It is unjust to try to make groups equal
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question:	It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
Post-question:	You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Strongly oppose	890	24.0%	0.23969836
2	2 - Somewhat oppose	669	18.0%	0.18017775
3	3 - Slightly oppose	411	11.1%	0.11069216
4	4 - Neutral	746	20.1%	0.20091570
5	5 - Slightly favor	490	13.2%	0.13196876
6	6 - Somewhat favor	329	8.9%	0.08860759
7	7 - Strongly favor	129	3.5%	0.03474280
97	Not answered	49	1.3%	0.01319688
98	Not asked	6284		NA

r17sdo7_7

Variable label:	Assertion: We should equalize conditions for different groups
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question:	We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.
Post-question:	You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Strongly oppose	29	0.8%	0.007810396
2	2 - Somewhat oppose	103	2.8%	0.027740372
3	3 - Slightly oppose	225	6.1%	0.060597899
4	4 - Neutral	349	9.4%	0.093994075
5	5 - Slightly favor	689	18.6%	0.185564234
6	6 - Somewhat favor	885	23.8%	0.238351737
7	7 - Strongly favor	1402	37.8%	0.377592243
97	Not answered	31	0.8%	0.008349044
98	Not asked	6284		NA

r17sdo7_8

Variable label:	Assertion: We should give all groups an equal chance to succeed
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question:	We should work to give all groups an equal chance to succeed.
Post-question:	You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description:	[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Strongly oppose	10	0.3%	0.002693240
2	2 - Somewhat oppose	17	0.5%	0.004578508
3	3 - Slightly oppose	37	1.0%	0.009964988
4	4 - Neutral	147	4.0%	0.039590628
5	5 - Slightly favor	342	9.2%	0.092108807
6	6 - Somewhat favor	703	18.9%	0.189334770
7	7 - Strongly favor	2438	65.7%	0.656611904
97	Not answered	19	0.5%	0.005117156
98	Not asked	6284		NA

r23sdo7_1

Variable label:	Degree of support/opposition: An ideal society requires some groups to be on top and others to be on the bottom
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Literal question:	An ideal society requires some groups to be on top and others to be on the bottom
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 – Strongly oppose	1434	36.5%	0.36460717
2	2 – Somewhat oppose	686	17.4%	0.17442156
3	3 – Slightly oppose	438	11.1%	0.11136537
4	4 - Neutral	535	13.6%	0.13602848
5	5 – Slightly favor	452	11.5%	0.11492499
6	6 – Somewhat favor	285	7.2%	0.07246377
7	7 – Strongly favor	59	1.5%	0.01500127
97	Not answered	44	1.1%	0.01118739
98	Not asked	6064		NA

r23sdo7_2

Variable label:	Degree of support/opposition: Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Literal question:	Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 – Strongly oppose	2371	60.3%	0.60284770
2	2 – Somewhat oppose	411	10.5%	0.10450038
3	3 – Slightly oppose	211	5.4%	0.05364861
4	4 - Neutral	458	11.6%	0.11645055
5	5 – Slightly favor	245	6.2%	0.06229341
6	6 – Somewhat favor	140	3.6%	0.03559624
7	7 – Strongly favor	52	1.3%	0.01322146
97	Not answered	45	1.1%	0.01144165
98	Not asked	6064		NA

r23sdo7_3

Variable label:	Degree of support/opposition: No one group should dominate in society.
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Literal question:	No one group should dominate in society.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 – Strongly oppose	138	3.5%	0.03508772
2	2 – Somewhat oppose	156	4.0%	0.03966438
3	3 – Slightly oppose	172	4.4%	0.04373252
4	4 - Neutral	397	10.1%	0.10094076
5	5 – Slightly favor	403	10.2%	0.10246631
6	6 – Somewhat favor	844	21.5%	0.21459446
7	7 – Strongly favor	1782	45.3%	0.45308924
97	Not answered	41	1.0%	0.01042461
98	Not asked	6064		NA

r23sdo7_4

Variable label:	Degree of support/opposition: Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top.
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Literal question:	Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 – Strongly oppose	158	4.0%	0.04017290
2	2 – Somewhat oppose	277	7.0%	0.07042970
3	3 – Slightly oppose	367	9.3%	0.09331299
4	4 - Neutral	535	13.6%	0.13602848
5	5 – Slightly favor	443	11.3%	0.11263666
6	6 – Somewhat favor	862	21.9%	0.21917112
7	7 – Strongly favor	1243	31.6%	0.31604373
97	Not answered	48	1.2%	0.01220442
98	Not asked	6064		NA

r23sdo7_5

Variable label:	Degree of support/opposition: Equality between groups should not be our main goal.
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Literal question:	Equality between groups should not be our main goal.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 – Strongly oppose	758	19.3%	0.19272820
2	2 – Somewhat oppose	817	20.8%	0.20772947
3	3 – Slightly oppose	451	11.5%	0.11467073
4	4 - Neutral	696	17.7%	0.17696415
5	5 – Slightly favor	519	13.2%	0.13196034
6	6 – Somewhat favor	410	10.4%	0.10424612
7	7 – Strongly favor	235	6.0%	0.05975083
97	Not answered	47	1.2%	0.01195017
98	Not asked	6064		NA

r23sdo7_6

Variable label:	Degree of support/opposition: It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Literal question:	It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 – Strongly oppose	895	22.8%	0.22756166
2	2 – Somewhat oppose	687	17.5%	0.17467582
3	3 – Slightly oppose	439	11.2%	0.11161963
4	4 - Neutral	870	22.1%	0.22120519
5	5 – Slightly favor	467	11.9%	0.11873888
6	6 – Somewhat favor	353	9.0%	0.08975337
7	7 – Strongly favor	171	4.3%	0.04347826
97	Not answered	51	1.3%	0.01296720
98	Not asked	6064		NA

r23sdo7_7

Variable label:	Degree of support/opposition: We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Literal question:	We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 – Strongly oppose	37	0.9%	0.009407577
2	2 – Somewhat oppose	111	2.8%	0.028222731
3	3 – Slightly oppose	165	4.2%	0.041952708
4	4 - Neutral	404	10.3%	0.102720570
5	5 – Slightly favor	656	16.7%	0.166793796
6	6 – Somewhat favor	929	23.6%	0.236206458
7	7 – Strongly favor	1587	40.4%	0.403508772
97	Not answered	44	1.1%	0.011187389
98	Not asked	6064		NA

r23sdo7_8

Variable label:	Degree of support/opposition: We should work to give all groups an equal chance to succeed.
Pre-question text:	Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Literal question:	We should work to give all groups an equal chance to succeed.
Technical description:	[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22] [Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 – Strongly oppose	25	0.6%	0.006356471
2	2 – Somewhat oppose	16	0.4%	0.004068141
3	3 – Slightly oppose	34	0.9%	0.008644800
4	4 - Neutral	181	4.6%	0.046020849
5	5 – Slightly favor	342	8.7%	0.086956522
6	6 – Somewhat favor	806	20.5%	0.204932621
7	7 – Strongly favor	2491	63.3%	0.633358759
97	Not answered	38	1.0%	0.009661836
98	Not asked	6064		NA

r25_bgchi

Variable label:	Living with children under 16 years
Literal question:	Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you, and if so, how many?
Technical description:	[Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	None	938	77.6%	0.7758478081
1	1	114	9.4%	0.0942928040
2	2	99	8.2%	0.0818858561
3	3	30	2.5%	0.0248138958
4	4	5	0.4%	0.0041356493
5	5	1	0.1%	0.0008271299
6	6 or more	1	0.1%	0.0008271299
97	Not answered	21	1.7%	0.0173697270
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r26k2_bgchi

Variable label:	Living with children under 16 years
Literal question:	Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you, most of or part of the time, and if so, how many?
Equivalent in others panels:	f3k2_bgchi; p9k2_bgchi
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	None	5105	82.8%	0.8277930923
1	1	471	7.6%	0.0763742500
2	2	412	6.7%	0.0668071996
3	3	110	1.8%	0.0178368737
4	4	16	0.3%	0.0025944544
5	5	2	0.0%	0.0003243068
6	6 or more	1	0.0%	0.0001621534
97	Not answered	50	0.8%	0.0081076699
98	Not asked	3830		NA

r11bk40_recode

Variable label:	Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
Literal question:	Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ] [Recoded from source variable r11bk40]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Church of Norway	2386	63.2%	0.632388020
2	The Catholic Church	36	1.0%	0.009541479
3	Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons)	136	3.6%	0.036045587
4	Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others)	27	0.7%	0.007156109
5	Islam	13	0.3%	0.003445534
6	I don't belong to any religion or religious communities.	1155	30.6%	0.306122449
97	No answer	20	0.5%	0.005300822
98	Not asked	6224		NA

r14bk40_recode

Variable label:	Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Recoded]
Literal question:	Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical description:	[Asked if r14group = 1 ] [Recoded from source variable r14bk40]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Church of Norway	395	60.7%	0.606758833
2	The Catholic Church	7	1.1%	0.010752688
3	Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons)	25	3.8%	0.038402458
4	Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others)	1	0.2%	0.001536098
5	Islam	3	0.5%	0.004608295
6	I don't belong to any religion or religious communities.	215	33.0%	0.330261137
97	No answer	5	0.8%	0.007680492
98	Not asked	9346		NA

r16bk40_recode

Variable label:	Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
Literal question:	Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. Recoded from source variable r16bk40]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Church of Norway	1105	61.9%	0.619047619
2	The Catholic Church	22	1.2%	0.012324930
3	Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons)	72	4.0%	0.040336134
4	Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others)	12	0.7%	0.006722689
5	Islam	6	0.3%	0.003361345
6	I don't belong to any religion or religious communities	566	31.7%	0.317086835
97	No answer	2	0.1%	0.001120448
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r18bk40_recode

Variable label:	Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
Literal question:	Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical description:	[Recoded from source variable r18bk40. Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Church of Norway	409	59.9%	0.598828697
2	The Catholic Church	5	0.7%	0.007320644
3	Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons)	28	4.1%	0.040995608
4	Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others)	6	0.9%	0.008784773
5	Islam	2	0.3%	0.002928258
6	I don't belong to any religion or religious communities	230	33.7%	0.336749634
97	No answer	3	0.4%	0.004392387
98	Not asked	9314		NA

r22bk40_recode

Variable label:	Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
Literal question:	Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical description:	[Recoded from source variable r22bk40. Asked if r22group = 7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Church of Norway	797	62.0%	0.620233463
2	The Catholic Church	11	0.9%	0.008560311
3	Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons)	52	4.0%	0.040466926
4	Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others)	9	0.7%	0.007003891
5	Islam	7	0.5%	0.005447471
6	I don't belong to any religion or religious communities	394	30.7%	0.306614786
97	Not answered	15	1.2%	0.011673152
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r25_bgrelrecode

Variable label:	Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [Recoded]
Literal question:	Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Church of Norway	717	59.3%	0.593052109
2	The Catholic Church	12	1.0%	0.009925558
3	Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons)	46	3.8%	0.038047974
4	Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others)	11	0.9%	0.009098428
5	Islam	7	0.6%	0.005789909
6	Do not belong to any religion or religious denominations	400	33.1%	0.330851944
97	Not answered	16	1.3%	0.013234078
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r11bk41

Variable label:	Attends religious meetings
Literal question:	Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Every day	4	0.1%	0.001060164
2	More than once a week	51	1.4%	0.013517095
3	Once a week	100	2.7%	0.026504108
4	At least once a month	187	5.0%	0.049562682
5	Only on special religious holidays	652	17.3%	0.172806785
6	Less frequently	794	21.0%	0.210442619
7	Never	1963	52.0%	0.520275643
97	Not answered	22	0.6%	0.005830904
98	Not asked	6224		NA

r14bk41

Variable label:	How often attend religious meetings, aside from special occasions.
Literal question:	Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
Technical description:	[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Every day	0	0.0%	0.00000000
2	More than once a week	7	1.1%	0.01075269
3	Once a week	28	4.3%	0.04301075
4	At least once a month	47	7.2%	0.07219662
5	Only on special religious holidays	96	14.7%	0.14746544
6	Less frequently	141	21.7%	0.21658986
7	Never	326	50.1%	0.50076805
97	Not answered	6	0.9%	0.00921659
98	Not asked	9346		NA

r16bk41

Variable label:	How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Literal question:	Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Technical description:	[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Every day	0	0.0%	0.000000000
2	More than once a week	26	1.5%	0.014565826
3	Once a week	33	1.8%	0.018487395
4	Once or a few times a month	55	3.1%	0.030812325
5	Several times a year	201	11.3%	0.112605042
6	Once a year	249	13.9%	0.139495798
7	Less than once a year	285	16.0%	0.159663866
8	Never	932	52.2%	0.522128852
97	Not answered	4	0.2%	0.002240896
98	Not asked	8212		NA

r18bk41

Variable label:	How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Literal question:	Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Technical description:	[Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Every day	0	0.0%	0.000000000
2	More than once a week	7	1.0%	0.010248902
3	Once a week	15	2.2%	0.021961933
4	Once or a few times a month	26	3.8%	0.038067350
5	Several times a year	65	9.5%	0.095168375
6	Once a year	94	13.8%	0.137628111
7	Less than once a year	107	15.7%	0.156661786
8	Never	365	53.4%	0.534407028
97	Not answered	4	0.6%	0.005856515
98	Not asked	9314		NA

r22bk41

Variable label:	Aside from weddings and funerals, how often do you attend religious meetings?
Literal question:	Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
Technical description:	[Asked if r22group = 7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Every day	1	0.1%	0.0007782101
2	More than once a week	12	0.9%	0.0093385214
3	Once a week	22	1.7%	0.0171206226
4	Once or a few times a month	50	3.9%	0.0389105058
5	Several times a year	100	7.8%	0.0778210117
6	Once a year	162	12.6%	0.1260700389
7	Less than once a year	223	17.4%	0.1735408560
8	Never	704	54.8%	0.5478599222
97	Not answered	11	0.9%	0.0085603113
98	Not asked	8712		NA

r25_bgrem

Variable label:	How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Literal question:	Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Technical description:	[Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Every day	1	0.1%	0.0008271299
2	More than once a week	14	1.2%	0.0115798180
3	Once a week	20	1.7%	0.0165425972
4	Once or a few times a month	40	3.3%	0.0330851944
5	Several times a year	91	7.5%	0.0752688172
6	Once a year	145	12.0%	0.1199338296
7	Less than once a year	208	17.2%	0.1720430108
8	Never	676	55.9%	0.5591397849
97	Not answered	14	1.2%	0.0115798180
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r23pkmeme21

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	83	1.1%	0.010751295
2	Agree	233	3.0%	0.030181347
3	Somewhat agree	906	11.7%	0.117357513
4	Neither agree nor disagree	709	9.2%	0.091839378
5	Somewhat disagree	816	10.6%	0.105699482
6	Disagree	2183	28.3%	0.282772021
7	Strongly disagree	2745	35.6%	0.355569948
97	Not answered	45	0.6%	0.005829016
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcsex

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree with the following assertion: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	72	1.3%	0.01266491
2	Agree	136	2.4%	0.02392260
3	Agree somewhat	577	10.1%	0.10149516
4	Neither agree nor disagree	441	7.8%	0.07757256
5	Disagree somewhat	528	9.3%	0.09287599
6	Disagree	1603	28.2%	0.28197010
7	Strongly disagree	2308	40.6%	0.40598065
97	Not answered	20	0.4%	0.00351803
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pkby2

Variable label:	How much safer or more unsafe has your local environment become over the past couple of years?
Pre-question text:	Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
Literal question:	How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Much safer	72	0.9%	0.009326425
2	Somewhat safer	462	6.0%	0.059844560
3	No change in safety	5604	72.6%	0.725906736
4	Somewhat more unsafe	1382	17.9%	0.179015544
5	Much more unsafe	156	2.0%	0.020207254
97	Not answered	44	0.6%	0.005699482
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r25_pcsaf

Variable label:	How much safer or more unsafe has your local environment become
Pre-question text:	Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
Literal question:	How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
Technical description:	[Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Much safer	24	2.0%	0.01985112
2	Somewhat safer	100	8.3%	0.08271299
3	No change in safity	776	64.2%	0.64185277
4	Somewhat more unsafe	279	23.1%	0.23076923
5	Much more unsafe	28	2.3%	0.02315964
97	Not answered	2	0.2%	0.00165426
98	Not asked	8788		NA

r26_pcsaf

Variable label:	How much safer or more unsafe has your local environment become
Literal question:	Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years. How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Much safer	56	1.2%	0.012187160
2	Somewhat safer	296	6.4%	0.064417845
3	No change in safity	3497	76.1%	0.761044614
4	Somewhat more unsafe	686	14.9%	0.149292709
5	Much more unsafe	48	1.0%	0.010446137
97	Not answered	12	0.3%	0.002611534
98	Not asked	5402		NA

r23pkby3

Variable label:	To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Literal question:	To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great extent	199	2.6%	0.025777202
2	To a great extent	895	11.6%	0.115932642
3	Somewhat	3371	43.7%	0.436658031
4	Slightly	2829	36.6%	0.366450777
5	Not at all	378	4.9%	0.048963731
97	Not answered	48	0.6%	0.006217617
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcter

Variable label:	To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Literal question:	To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great extent	113	2.0%	0.019876869
2	To a great extent	551	9.7%	0.096921724
3	Somewhat	2456	43.2%	0.432014072
4	Slightly	2220	39.1%	0.390501319
5	Not at all	330	5.8%	0.058047493
97	Not answered	15	0.3%	0.002638522
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pk52

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question:	The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	522	6.8%	0.067616580
2	Agree	1471	19.1%	0.190544041
3	Somewhat agree	2210	28.6%	0.286269430
4	Neither agree nor disagree	1067	13.8%	0.138212435
5	Somewhat disagree	1039	13.5%	0.134585492
6	Disagree	901	11.7%	0.116709845
7	Strongly disagree	479	6.2%	0.062046632
97	Not answered	31	0.4%	0.004015544
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcpri

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition: The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	463	8.1%	0.081442392
2	Agree	1277	22.5%	0.224626209
3	Agree somewhat	1669	29.4%	0.293579595
4	Neither agree nor disagree	769	13.5%	0.135268250
5	Disagree somewhat	682	12.0%	0.119964820
6	Disagree	535	9.4%	0.094107300
7	Strongly disagree	259	4.6%	0.045558487
97	Not answered	31	0.5%	0.005452946
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r24_pcimm

Variable label:	In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Literal question:	In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very great advantage	391	5.5%	0.05480796
2	A great advantage	1705	23.9%	0.23899636
3	A slight advantage	2866	40.2%	0.40173816
4	Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage	932	13.1%	0.13064200
5	A slight disadvantage	822	11.5%	0.11522288
6	A great disadvantage	257	3.6%	0.03602467
7	A very great disadvantage	140	2.0%	0.01962433
97	Not answered	21	0.3%	0.00294365
98	Not asked	2863		NA

r26_pcimm

Variable label:	Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
Literal question:	In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very great advantage	316	5.6%	0.055584872
2	A great advantage	1308	23.0%	0.230079156
3	A slight advantage	2245	39.5%	0.394898857
4	Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage	773	13.6%	0.135971856
5	A slight disadvantage	674	11.9%	0.118557608
6	A great disadvantage	225	4.0%	0.039577836
7	A very great disadvantage	121	2.1%	0.021284081
97	Not answered	23	0.4%	0.004045734
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pkmeme9

Variable label:	Should be easier/harder for refugees to be granted residence in Norway
Literal question:	What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here?
Post-question:	Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Much easier	285	3.7%	0.036917098
2	Easier	998	12.9%	0.129274611
3	Somewhat easier	1681	21.8%	0.217746114
4	Same as today	2779	36.0%	0.359974093
5	Somewhat more difficult	935	12.1%	0.121113990
6	More difficult	565	7.3%	0.073186528
7	Much more difficult	457	5.9%	0.059196891
97	Not answered	20	0.3%	0.002590674
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcref

Variable label:	Your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum.
Literal question:	What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Much easier	198	3.5%	0.034828496
2	Easier	734	12.9%	0.129111697
3	Somewhat easier	1211	21.3%	0.213016711
4	Same as today	2300	40.5%	0.404573439
5	Slightly more difficult	599	10.5%	0.105364996
6	More difficult	357	6.3%	0.062796834
7	Much more difficult	250	4.4%	0.043975374
97	Not answered	36	0.6%	0.006332454
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pkdv55

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: It should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools.
Pre-question text:	Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith.
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	201	2.6%	0.026036269
2	Agree	727	9.4%	0.094170984
3	Somewhat agree	1044	13.5%	0.135233161
4	Neither agree nor disagree	1285	16.6%	0.166450777
5	Somewhat disagree	1107	14.3%	0.143393782
6	Disagree	1549	20.1%	0.200647668
7	Strongly disagree	1784	23.1%	0.231088083
97	Not answered	23	0.3%	0.002979275
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcmsc

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: It should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools.
Literal question:	Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith. How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)] [Shown on the same page with [r26_pcmsc_txt] if [r26_pcmsc_ran] == 1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	172	3.0%	0.030255057
2	Agree	648	11.4%	0.113984169
3	Agree somewhat	724	12.7%	0.127352682
4	Neither agree nor disagree	1070	18.8%	0.188214600
5	Disagree somewhat	737	13.0%	0.129639402
6	Disagree	1025	18.0%	0.180299033
7	Strongly disagree	1286	22.6%	0.226209323
97	Not answered	23	0.4%	0.004045734
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pk101

Variable label:	Your opinion on Norway’s preconditions for integrating refugees
Literal question:	As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	610	7.9%	0.079015544
2	Good	2361	30.6%	0.305829016
3	Quite good	1620	21.0%	0.209844560
4	Neither good nor bad	787	10.2%	0.101943005
5	Quite bad	1331	17.2%	0.172409326
6	Bad	761	9.9%	0.098575130
7	Very bad	221	2.9%	0.028626943
97	Not answered	29	0.4%	0.003756477
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcint

Variable label:	As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
Literal question:	As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	363	6.4%	0.063852243
2	Good	1687	29.7%	0.296745822
3	Somewhat good	1261	22.2%	0.221811785
4	Neither good nor bad	662	11.6%	0.116446790
5	Somewhat poor	1009	17.7%	0.177484609
6	Poor	508	8.9%	0.089357960
7	Very poor	158	2.8%	0.027792436
97	Not answered	37	0.7%	0.006508355
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pk_sentral

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: National authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
Literal question:	National authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	1094	14.2%	0.141709845
2	Agree	1788	23.2%	0.231606218
3	Somewhat agree	1959	25.4%	0.253756477
4	Neither agree nor disagree	1273	16.5%	0.164896373
5	Somewhat disagree	625	8.1%	0.080958549
6	Disagree	698	9.0%	0.090414508
7	Strongly disagree	249	3.2%	0.032253886
97	Not answered	34	0.4%	0.004404145
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcrur

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for [r26_pcrur_ran].
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion: Government authorities show little consideration for [r26_pcrur_ran].
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	840	14.8%	0.147757256
2	Agree	1305	23.0%	0.229551451
3	Agree somewhat	1482	26.1%	0.260686016
4	Neither agree nor disagree	855	15.0%	0.150395778
5	Disagree somewhat	479	8.4%	0.084256816
6	Disagree	533	9.4%	0.093755497
7	Strongly disagree	176	3.1%	0.030958663
97	Not answered	15	0.3%	0.002638522
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pk55

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The number of municipalities should be reduced.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
Literal question:	Norway now has 356 municipalities instead of 422 as before. The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	846	11.0%	0.109585492
2	Agree	1113	14.4%	0.144170984
3	Somewhat agree	1044	13.5%	0.135233161
4	Neither agree nor disagree	1652	21.4%	0.213989637
5	Somewhat disagree	790	10.2%	0.102331606
6	Disagree	1351	17.5%	0.175000000
7	Strongly disagree	882	11.4%	0.114248705
97	Not answered	42	0.5%	0.005440415
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcmun

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers
Literal question:	Norway now has 356 municipalities instead of 422 as before. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions: The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	735	12.9%	0.129287599
2	Agree	783	13.8%	0.137730871
3	Agree somewhat	766	13.5%	0.134740545
4	Neither agree nor disagree	1233	21.7%	0.216886544
5	Disagree somewhat	571	10.0%	0.100439754
6	Disagree	1011	17.8%	0.177836412
7	Strongly disagree	572	10.1%	0.100615655
97	Not answered	14	0.2%	0.002462621
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23kmskepsis

Variable label:	Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your view on climate change?
Literal question:	Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your view on climate change?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	I don’t believe that the climate is changing.	31	0.4%	0.004015544
2	I don't know whether the climate is changing or not.	281	3.6%	0.036398964
3	I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent due to human action	1626	21.1%	0.210621762
4	I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to human action.	5733	74.3%	0.742616580
97	Not answered	49	0.6%	0.006347150
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcscc

Variable label:	Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your view on climate change?
Literal question:	Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your view on climate change?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	I don’t believe that the climate is changing.	36	0.6%	0.006332454
2	I don't know whether the climate is changing or not.	216	3.8%	0.037994723
3	I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent due to human action	1211	21.3%	0.213016711
4	I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to human action.	4201	73.9%	0.738962181
97	Not answered	21	0.4%	0.003693931
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pkkm2

Variable label:	How concerned are you about climate change?
Literal question:	How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Not at all concerned	413	5.3%	0.05349741
2	Not very concerned	1122	14.5%	0.14533679
3	Slightly concerned	2306	29.9%	0.29870466
4	Very concerned	2447	31.7%	0.31696891
5	Extremely concerned	1421	18.4%	0.18406736
97	Not answered	11	0.1%	0.00142487
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26k2_pcwcc

Variable label:	How worried are you about climate change?
Literal question:	How worried are you about climate change?
Question owner:	Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen (NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels:	f3k2_pcwcc; p9k2_pcwcc
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2,3)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Not at all worried	336	4.6%	0.046485888
2	Not very worried	1007	13.9%	0.139319314
3	Somewhat worried	2182	30.2%	0.301881572
4	Worried	2524	34.9%	0.349197565
5	Very worried	1162	16.1%	0.160763697
97	Not answered	17	0.2%	0.002351965
98	Not asked	2769		NA

r23pkkm42

Variable label:	Proposal that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
Pre-question text:	The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
Literal question:	Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
Post-question:	See National Transport Plan 2018-2029, page 16, available here [external link]: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-33-20162017/id2546287
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run on hydrogen.	2539	32.9%	0.328886010
2	In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars which run on diesel or petrol.	5125	66.4%	0.663860104
97	Not answered	56	0.7%	0.007253886
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pccar

Variable label:	Proposal that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
Literal question:	The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025. Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
Post-question:	See National Transport Plan 2018-2029, page 16, available here [external link]: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-33-20162017/id2546287
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run on hydrogen.	1718	30.2%	0.302198769
2	In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars which run on diesel or petrol.	3916	68.9%	0.688830255
97	Not answered	51	0.9%	0.008970976
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23pkkm4

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
Literal question:	We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja areas
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	2607	33.8%	0.33769430
2	Agree	1453	18.8%	0.18821244
3	Somewhat agree	798	10.3%	0.10336788
4	Neither agree nor disagree	956	12.4%	0.12383420
5	Somewhat disagree	701	9.1%	0.09080311
6	Disagree	675	8.7%	0.08743523
7	Strongly disagree	511	6.6%	0.06619171
97	Not answered	19	0.2%	0.00246114
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r23pk_vekst

Variable label:	Agree/Disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
Literal question:	Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	358	4.6%	0.046373057
2	Agree	826	10.7%	0.106994819
3	Somewhat agree	1672	21.7%	0.216580311
4	Neither agree nor disagree	963	12.5%	0.124740933
5	Somewhat disagree	1681	21.8%	0.217746114
6	Disagree	1470	19.0%	0.190414508
7	Strongly disagree	721	9.3%	0.093393782
97	Not answered	29	0.4%	0.003756477
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcgro

Variable label:	Agree/Disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion: Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2) \| (r26_group = 1) \| (r26_group = 1,2) \| (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	210	3.7%	0.036939314
2	Agree	527	9.3%	0.092700088
3	Agree somewhat	1248	22.0%	0.219525066
4	Neither agree nor disagree	699	12.3%	0.122955145
5	Disagree somewhat	1259	22.1%	0.221459982
6	Disagree	1155	20.3%	0.203166227
7	Strongly disagree	572	10.1%	0.100615655
97	Not answered	15	0.3%	0.002638522
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r26_pcoil

Variable label:	Development of the oil and gas industry in Norway. In 10 to 15 years, the industry should be…
Literal question:	There is frequent debate about how the oil and gas industry in Norway should be developed over the next 10 to 15 years. Which of the following options is closest to your view? In 10 to 15 years, the oil and gas industry should be…
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2) \| (r26_group = 1) \| (r26_group = 1,2) \| (r26_group = 2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	As large as possible	349	6.1%	0.061389622
2	Larger than today	416	7.3%	0.073175022
3	Just as large as today	1876	33.0%	0.329991205
4	Smaller than today	2082	36.6%	0.366226913
5	As small as possible	936	16.5%	0.164643799
97	Not answered	26	0.5%	0.004573439
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r23meme50

Variable label:	Generally speaking, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in Norway?
Literal question:	Generally speaking, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in Norway?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	85	1.1%	0.011010363
2	Really dislike	221	2.9%	0.028626943
3	Dislike somewhat	727	9.4%	0.094170984
4	Neither dislike nor like	2203	28.5%	0.285362694
5	Like somewhat	2077	26.9%	0.269041451
6	Really like	2019	26.2%	0.261528497
7	Intensely like	349	4.5%	0.045207254
97	Not answered	39	0.5%	0.005051813
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26_pcldi

Variable label:	Like/dislike: immigrants in Norway
Literal question:	In general, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
7	Intensely like	341	6.0%	0.059982410
6	Really like	1521	26.8%	0.267546174
5	Like somewhat	1477	26.0%	0.259806508
4	Neither dislike nor like	1644	28.9%	0.289182058
3	Dislike somewhat	496	8.7%	0.087247142
2	Really dislike	103	1.8%	0.018117854
1	Intensely dislike	59	1.0%	0.010378188
97	Not answered	44	0.8%	0.007739666
98	Not asked	4312		NA

r24_pceum

Variable label:	How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
Literal question:	How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very positive	926	13.0%	0.129800953
2	Positive	1410	19.8%	0.197645080
3	Somewhat positive	1130	15.8%	0.158396412
4	Neither negative nor positive	742	10.4%	0.104008971
5	Somewhat negative	1029	14.4%	0.144238856
6	Negative	979	13.7%	0.137230165
7	Very negative	904	12.7%	0.126717129
97	Not answered	14	0.2%	0.001962433
98	Not asked	2863		NA

r26k2_pceum

Variable label:	How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
Literal question:	How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
Equivalent in others panels:	f3k2_pceum; p9k2_pceum
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2,4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very positive	766	10.6%	0.10555326
2	Positive	1221	16.8%	0.16825134
3	Somewhat positive	1016	14.0%	0.14000276
4	Neither positive nor negative	857	11.8%	0.11809288
5	Somewhat negative	962	13.3%	0.13256166
6	Negative	1170	16.1%	0.16122365
7	Very negative	1225	16.9%	0.16880254
97	Not answered	40	0.6%	0.00551192
98	Not asked	2740		NA

r23pk103

Variable label:	How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
Literal question:	How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very great advantage	993	12.9%	0.12862694
2	A great advantage	1984	25.7%	0.25699482
3	A slight advantage	2156	27.9%	0.27927461
4	Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage	825	10.7%	0.10686528
5	A slight disadvantage	944	12.2%	0.12227979
6	A great disadvantage	483	6.3%	0.06256477
7	A very great disadvantage	253	3.3%	0.03277202
97	Not answered	82	1.1%	0.01062176
98	Not asked	2277		NA

r26k2_pceea

Variable label:	How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
Literal question:	How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
Equivalent in others panels:	f3k2_pceea; p9k2_pceea
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2,4)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A very great advantage	901	12.4%	0.12415599
2	A great advantage	1868	25.7%	0.25740664
3	A slight advantage	2040	28.1%	0.28110790
4	Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage	721	9.9%	0.09935235
5	A slight disadvantage	948	13.1%	0.13063249
6	A great disadvantage	432	6.0%	0.05952873
7	A very great disadvantage	263	3.6%	0.03624087
97	Not answered	84	1.2%	0.01157503
98	Not asked	2740		NA

r24_pcnat

Variable label:	Norways membership status in NATO
Literal question:	Which of the following alternatives is closest to your point of view:
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Norway should continue to be a member of NATO.	6843	95.9%	0.959209420
2	Norway should opt out of NATO.	259	3.6%	0.036305018
97	Not answered	32	0.4%	0.004485562
98	Not asked	2863		NA

r25_innae

Variable label:	How do you rate the increased military presence of NATO in Eastern Europe?
Pre-question text:	NATO has recently increased its military forces and military equipment in Eastern Europe considerably.
Literal question:	How do you rate the increased military presence in Eastern Europe?
Technical description:	[All respondents asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very positively	3097	34.4%	0.343920044
2	Somewhat positively	3157	35.1%	0.350583009
3	Neither positively, nor negatively	1091	12.1%	0.121154914
4	Somewhat negatively	773	8.6%	0.085841199
5	Very negatively	574	6.4%	0.063742365
6	Do not know	267	3.0%	0.029650194
97	Not answered	46	0.5%	0.005108273
98	Not asked	992		NA

r26_innae

Variable label:	How do you rate the increased military presence of NATO in Eastern Europe?
Literal question:	NATO has recently increased its military forces and military equipment in Eastern Europe considerably. How do you rate the increased military presence in Eastern Europe?
Technical description:	[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9997] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very positively	1815	31.9%	0.319261214
2	Somewhat positively	1867	32.8%	0.328408091
3	Neither positively, nor negatively	672	11.8%	0.118205805
4	Somewhat negatively	569	10.0%	0.100087951
5	Very negatively	355	6.2%	0.062445031
6	Do not know	382	6.7%	0.067194371
97	Not answered	25	0.4%	0.004397537
98	Not asked	4312		NA

Codebook - Round 27 - Norwegian Citizen Panel