Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Mikael Andersson, Sveinung Arnesen, Lise Bjånesøy, Åsta Nordø, Endre
Tvinnereim, Erik Knudsen
|
Scientific team, University of Bergen and UNI Research Rokkan Centre
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in two waves,
wave 1 and wave 3. In wave 1 4.870 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 1). In wave 3 5.623 members were recruited.
Prior to wave 5 the Norwegian Citizen Panel had 10,247 members. The
sampling procedure of wave and wave 1 is identical. 25 000 individuals
over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the Norwegian National
Population Registry. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name,
c) address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a online questionnaire. Existing members receivs
e-mail invitations asking for their participation in the current wave.
New panel members were recruited in multiple steps.
First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters
contained the following information: a) a description of the project, b)
the Citizen Panel’s policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the
anonymity of the participants, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the
participants’ rights to opt of the panel at any time in the future, e)
contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a
unique log-in id and the web address to the panel’s web site and g) the
estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).
The invitation was emailed on the 01st of March 2016.
Three reminders were sent at the following dates: 04th of March, 08th of
March, and 11th of March. The reminder was sent to those who a) had not
entered the questionnaire, and b) had not completed the questionnaire.
Wave 6 was closed 19th of March.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix). When
calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s
geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These
attributes were included in the sample file we received from the
Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of
education is provided by the respondents when answering the
questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer
this question. Because of this, two different weights have been
calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 6
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r6Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r6Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r6Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-06-17
|
r6dv5
|
Rename:
r65dv5 is renamed to r6dv5
|
|
NA
|
2021-06-17
|
r65dv5
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-07-01
|
r6k26
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 6
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-11
|
r6friiv6_10_other
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r6p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r6p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-18
|
r6p3
|
Updated the value of 1 respondent.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r6p4_1
|
Corrected values of 4 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r6p4_2
|
Corrected values of 4 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r6_weight_2
|
Corrected values of 4 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
r6p4_1
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
r6p4_2
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-02-02
|
r6km62a
|
Updated english variable documentation.
|
|
NA
|
2017-02-02
|
r6km62b
|
Updated english variable documentation.
|
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r6lb1b
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2016-08-01
|
r6km66
|
Flipped answer scale if r6rankm66 = 2.
|
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
r6pad4c
|
Corrected variable documentation.
|
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
r6trans1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
r6km66_open
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
r6km12
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
r6km62a
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
r6km62b
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
v-100
|
2016-04-15
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 6
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 6 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
4859
|
|
# Variables
|
538
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6u
|
Variable label:
|
Sub-group
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
U1 |
1190 |
24.5% |
0.2449064 |
| 2 |
U2 |
1249 |
25.7% |
0.2570488 |
| 3 |
U3 |
1164 |
24.0% |
0.2395555 |
| 4 |
U4 |
1256 |
25.8% |
0.2584894 |
r6rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
Time of recruitment
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
2208 |
45.4% |
0.4544145 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
2651 |
54.6% |
0.5455855 |
r6k13
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you discuss politics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often would you say that you discuss politics with others?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Often |
1473 |
30.3% |
0.303148796 |
| 2 |
Sometimes |
2584 |
53.2% |
0.531796666 |
| 3 |
Rarely |
740 |
15.2% |
0.152294711 |
| 4 |
Never |
53 |
1.1% |
0.010907594 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.2% |
0.001852233 |
r6tilfreds_1
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Life at the moment
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied
are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Life at the moment?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
1135 |
23.4% |
0.233587158 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2790 |
57.4% |
0.574192221 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
684 |
14.1% |
0.140769706 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
180 |
3.7% |
0.037044659 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
35 |
0.7% |
0.007203128 |
| 97 |
No Answer |
35 |
0.7% |
0.007203128 |
r6tilfreds_2
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Your personal economy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied
are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your personal economy?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
873 |
18.0% |
0.17966660 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2650 |
54.5% |
0.54537971 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
860 |
17.7% |
0.17699115 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
325 |
6.7% |
0.06688619 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
97 |
2.0% |
0.01996296 |
| 97 |
No Answer |
54 |
1.1% |
0.01111340 |
r6tilfreds_3
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: The government in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied
are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
258 |
5.3% |
0.05309735 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1422 |
29.3% |
0.29265281 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1555 |
32.0% |
0.32002470 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
1120 |
23.1% |
0.23050010 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
450 |
9.3% |
0.09261165 |
| 97 |
No Answer |
54 |
1.1% |
0.01111340 |
r6tilfreds_4
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: How democracy works in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied
are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
508 |
10.5% |
0.10454826 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2487 |
51.2% |
0.51183371 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1320 |
27.2% |
0.27166084 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
392 |
8.1% |
0.08067504 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
98 |
2.0% |
0.02016876 |
| 97 |
No Answer |
54 |
1.1% |
0.01111340 |
r6k10
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of the economic situation in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
431 |
8.9% |
0.088701379 |
| 2 |
Good |
2338 |
48.1% |
0.481168965 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
1113 |
22.9% |
0.229059477 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
452 |
9.3% |
0.093023256 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
411 |
8.5% |
0.084585306 |
| 6 |
Bad |
80 |
1.6% |
0.016464293 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
16 |
0.3% |
0.003292859 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
0.4% |
0.003704466 |
r6k204
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party if parliamentary election tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
221 |
4.5% |
0.045482610 |
| 2 |
The Progress party |
563 |
11.6% |
0.115867462 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
1149 |
23.6% |
0.236468409 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
251 |
5.2% |
0.051656719 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
255 |
5.2% |
0.052479934 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
246 |
5.1% |
0.050627701 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
212 |
4.4% |
0.043630377 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1481 |
30.5% |
0.304795225 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
138 |
2.8% |
0.028400906 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
161 |
3.3% |
0.033134390 |
| 11 |
Not entitled to vote |
70 |
1.4% |
0.014406256 |
| 12 |
Other: |
83 |
1.7% |
0.017081704 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
0.6% |
0.005968306 |
r6k204_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party if parliamentary election tomorrow, other
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6k6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Christian Democrats
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
484 |
10.0% |
0.09960897 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
773 |
15.9% |
0.15908623 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1108 |
22.8% |
0.22803046 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1218 |
25.1% |
0.25066886 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
891 |
18.3% |
0.18337106 |
| 6 |
Really like |
265 |
5.5% |
0.05453797 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01173081 |
| 97 |
No answer |
63 |
1.3% |
0.01296563 |
r6k6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party of Norway
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
155 |
3.2% |
0.03189957 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
525 |
10.8% |
0.10804692 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
955 |
19.7% |
0.19654250 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
631 |
13.0% |
0.12986211 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1235 |
25.4% |
0.25416752 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1033 |
21.3% |
0.21259518 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
265 |
5.5% |
0.05453797 |
| 97 |
No answer |
60 |
1.2% |
0.01234822 |
r6k6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1332 |
27.4% |
0.27413048 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
940 |
19.3% |
0.19345544 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
680 |
14.0% |
0.13994649 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
431 |
8.9% |
0.08870138 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
740 |
15.2% |
0.15229471 |
| 6 |
Really like |
490 |
10.1% |
0.10084380 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
193 |
4.0% |
0.03972011 |
| 97 |
No answer |
53 |
1.1% |
0.01090759 |
r6k6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
452 |
9.3% |
0.093023256 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
664 |
13.7% |
0.136653632 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1025 |
21.1% |
0.210948755 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1156 |
23.8% |
0.237909035 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1103 |
22.7% |
0.227001441 |
| 6 |
Really like |
348 |
7.2% |
0.071619675 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
46 |
0.9% |
0.009466969 |
| 97 |
No answer |
65 |
1.3% |
0.013377238 |
r6k6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
821 |
16.9% |
0.16896481 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
840 |
17.3% |
0.17287508 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
895 |
18.4% |
0.18419428 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
913 |
18.8% |
0.18789874 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
828 |
17.0% |
0.17040543 |
| 6 |
Really like |
414 |
8.5% |
0.08520272 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
91 |
1.9% |
0.01872813 |
| 97 |
No answer |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01173081 |
r6k6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
253 |
5.2% |
0.05206833 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
544 |
11.2% |
0.11195719 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1050 |
21.6% |
0.21609385 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1663 |
34.2% |
0.34225149 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
943 |
19.4% |
0.19407285 |
| 6 |
Really like |
281 |
5.8% |
0.05783083 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
59 |
1.2% |
0.01214242 |
| 97 |
No answer |
66 |
1.4% |
0.01358304 |
r6k6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
971 |
20.0% |
0.19983536 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
764 |
15.7% |
0.15723400 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
791 |
16.3% |
0.16279070 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
878 |
18.1% |
0.18069562 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
916 |
18.9% |
0.18851616 |
| 6 |
Really like |
402 |
8.3% |
0.08273307 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
83 |
1.7% |
0.01708170 |
| 97 |
No answer |
54 |
1.1% |
0.01111340 |
r6k6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
180 |
3.7% |
0.03704466 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
367 |
7.6% |
0.07552994 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
741 |
15.3% |
0.15250051 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
749 |
15.4% |
0.15414694 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1365 |
28.1% |
0.28092200 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1148 |
23.6% |
0.23626261 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
257 |
5.3% |
0.05289154 |
| 97 |
No answer |
52 |
1.1% |
0.01070179 |
r6k6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1162 |
23.9% |
0.23914386 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
919 |
18.9% |
0.18913357 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
725 |
14.9% |
0.14920766 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1072 |
22.1% |
0.22062153 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
635 |
13.1% |
0.13068533 |
| 6 |
Really like |
216 |
4.4% |
0.04445359 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
53 |
1.1% |
0.01090759 |
| 97 |
No answer |
77 |
1.6% |
0.01584688 |
r6k9_1
|
Variable label:
|
[1] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most
important issue.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6k9_2
|
Variable label:
|
[2] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most
important issue.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6k9_3
|
Variable label:
|
[3] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most
important issue.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6ran3
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=1 or u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=1 or u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2354] [Invalid:2505]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
1140 |
48.4% |
0.4842821 |
| 2 |
2 |
1214 |
51.6% |
0.5157179 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2505 |
|
NA |
r6km61a
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the words climate change [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the words climate change?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 or u=3 and ran3=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6km61b
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the words environmental problems [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the words environmental
problems?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 or u=3 and ran3=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6km5
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent is it possible to prevent harmful climate change
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let us assume that climate change can be a major problem for the world
in the future if nothing is done about it.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think it is possible to prevent harmful climate
change?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Choose the statement that best matches your viewpoint:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 or u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It is impossible to prevent harmful climate change. |
125 |
10.5% |
0.105042017 |
| 2 |
It is possible, but very difficult, to prevent harmful climate change. |
787 |
66.1% |
0.661344538 |
| 3 |
It is possible and entirely realistic to prevent harmful climate change. |
261 |
21.9% |
0.219327731 |
| 4 |
It is easy to prevent harmful climate change. |
13 |
1.1% |
0.010924370 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003361345 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6km12
|
Variable label:
|
Climate change: what should be done [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think should be done about climate change?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6dv30_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The tax burden should be reduced
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to cutbacks in the
welfare state.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
122 |
2.5% |
0.02510805 |
| 2 |
Agree |
264 |
5.4% |
0.05433217 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
670 |
13.8% |
0.13788845 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
550 |
11.3% |
0.11319201 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
898 |
18.5% |
0.18481169 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1352 |
27.8% |
0.27824655 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
973 |
20.0% |
0.20024696 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
0.6% |
0.00617411 |
r6dv30_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Commercial private schools should be allowed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Commercial private schools should be allowed.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
267 |
5.5% |
0.054949578 |
| 2 |
Agree |
777 |
16.0% |
0.159909446 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
958 |
19.7% |
0.197159909 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
704 |
14.5% |
0.144885779 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
709 |
14.6% |
0.145914797 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
742 |
15.3% |
0.152706318 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
668 |
13.7% |
0.137476847 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
0.7% |
0.006997325 |
r6dv30_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Many public activities could be done better and cheaper by
the private sector
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Many public activities could have been carried out both with better
results and at lower cost, if they were operated by the private sector.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
290 |
6.0% |
0.059683062 |
| 2 |
Agree |
683 |
14.1% |
0.140563902 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1219 |
25.1% |
0.250874666 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
599 |
12.3% |
0.123276394 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
675 |
13.9% |
0.138917473 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
833 |
17.1% |
0.171434452 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
531 |
10.9% |
0.109281745 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
0.6% |
0.005968306 |
r6dv31_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The state should help reduce income disparities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government should contribute to reducing income differences in
society.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
688 |
14.2% |
0.14159292 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1344 |
27.7% |
0.27660012 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1332 |
27.4% |
0.27413048 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
539 |
11.1% |
0.11092817 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
449 |
9.2% |
0.09240584 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
323 |
6.6% |
0.06647458 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
105 |
2.2% |
0.02160938 |
| 97 |
No answer |
79 |
1.6% |
0.01625849 |
r6dv31_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is better for a country if there is a diversity of
different religions and beliefs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different
religions and beliefs.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
399 |
8.2% |
0.08211566 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1051 |
21.6% |
0.21629965 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
998 |
20.5% |
0.20539206 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
756 |
15.6% |
0.15558757 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
706 |
14.5% |
0.14529739 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
512 |
10.5% |
0.10537148 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
359 |
7.4% |
0.07388352 |
| 97 |
No answer |
78 |
1.6% |
0.01605269 |
r6dv31_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that
Norway has committed to should be carried out abroad
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has
committed to, should be carried out abroad.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
173 |
3.6% |
0.03560403 |
| 2 |
Agree |
355 |
7.3% |
0.07306030 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
608 |
12.5% |
0.12512863 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1127 |
23.2% |
0.23194073 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
846 |
17.4% |
0.17410990 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1131 |
23.3% |
0.23276394 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
528 |
10.9% |
0.10866433 |
| 97 |
No answer |
91 |
1.9% |
0.01872813 |
r6dvh_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and
Vesterålen areas
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the area by Lofoten and
Vesterålen.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1049 |
21.6% |
0.21588804 |
| 2 |
Agree |
869 |
17.9% |
0.17884338 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
586 |
12.1% |
0.12060095 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
850 |
17.5% |
0.17493311 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
574 |
11.8% |
0.11813130 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
560 |
11.5% |
0.11525005 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
311 |
6.4% |
0.06400494 |
| 97 |
No answer |
60 |
1.2% |
0.01234822 |
r6dvh_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as
Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians
have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
284 |
5.8% |
0.05844824 |
| 2 |
Agree |
667 |
13.7% |
0.13727104 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
847 |
17.4% |
0.17431570 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
414 |
8.5% |
0.08520272 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1023 |
21.1% |
0.21053715 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
886 |
18.2% |
0.18234205 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
684 |
14.1% |
0.14076971 |
| 97 |
No answer |
54 |
1.1% |
0.01111340 |
r6dvh_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2012 |
41.4% |
0.41407697 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1412 |
29.1% |
0.29059477 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
409 |
8.4% |
0.08417370 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
366 |
7.5% |
0.07532414 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
248 |
5.1% |
0.05103931 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
210 |
4.3% |
0.04321877 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
144 |
3.0% |
0.02963573 |
| 97 |
No answer |
58 |
1.2% |
0.01193661 |
r6oc_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The difference between men’s and women’s behaviour is
determined by genetic conditions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you think that these
statements are completely true or not true at all?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I think that the difference between men’s and women’s behaviour and
personality is largely determined by genetic conditions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1. Not true at all |
157 |
13.2% |
0.13193277 |
| 2 |
2. |
213 |
17.9% |
0.17899160 |
| 3 |
3. |
222 |
18.7% |
0.18655462 |
| 4 |
4. |
246 |
20.7% |
0.20672269 |
| 5 |
5. |
187 |
15.7% |
0.15714286 |
| 6 |
6. |
99 |
8.3% |
0.08319328 |
| 7 |
7. Completely true |
47 |
3.9% |
0.03949580 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01596639 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6oc_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Intelligence is determined by genetic conditions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you think that these
statements are completely true or not true at all?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I find that intelligence is a property that is largely determined by
genetic conditions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1. Not true at all |
124 |
10.4% |
0.10420168 |
| 2 |
2. |
146 |
12.3% |
0.12268908 |
| 3 |
3. |
201 |
16.9% |
0.16890756 |
| 4 |
4. |
262 |
22.0% |
0.22016807 |
| 5 |
5. |
263 |
22.1% |
0.22100840 |
| 6 |
6. |
143 |
12.0% |
0.12016807 |
| 7 |
7. Completely true |
34 |
2.9% |
0.02857143 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.4% |
0.01428571 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6oc_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Genetic differences between Asians and Europeans a reason for
the differences in abilities between individuals in these groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you think that these
statements are completely true or not true at all?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I think that genetic differences between Asians and Europeans are an
important reason for the differences in abilities between individuals
from these groups.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1. Not true at all |
526 |
44.2% |
0.44201681 |
| 2 |
2. |
244 |
20.5% |
0.20504202 |
| 3 |
3. |
134 |
11.3% |
0.11260504 |
| 4 |
4. |
157 |
13.2% |
0.13193277 |
| 5 |
5. |
62 |
5.2% |
0.05210084 |
| 6 |
6. |
27 |
2.3% |
0.02268908 |
| 7 |
7. Completely true |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01596639 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6oc_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Parents and children have similiar behaviour and character
traits because they share genetic heredity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you think that these
statements are completely true or not true at all?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I think that the main reason why parents and children have such similar
behaviour and such similar character traits is that they share genetic
heredity.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1. Not true at all |
58 |
4.9% |
0.04873950 |
| 2 |
2. |
159 |
13.4% |
0.13361345 |
| 3 |
3. |
207 |
17.4% |
0.17394958 |
| 4 |
4. |
327 |
27.5% |
0.27478992 |
| 5 |
5. |
223 |
18.7% |
0.18739496 |
| 6 |
6. |
139 |
11.7% |
0.11680672 |
| 7 |
7. Completely true |
60 |
5.0% |
0.05042017 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.4% |
0.01428571 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1182] [Invalid:3677]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
588 |
49.7% |
0.4974619 |
| 2 |
2 |
594 |
50.3% |
0.5025381 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3677 |
|
NA |
r6fr1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Art and Culture, band and choir
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied
arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums,
collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and
artistic activities]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
78 |
13.3% |
0.1326531 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
510 |
86.7% |
0.8673469 |
r6fr1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Athletics and sport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle
club, company sports and disabled sports]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Athletics and sport |
123 |
20.9% |
0.2091837 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
465 |
79.1% |
0.7908163 |
r6fr1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts.
Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners’ clubs. Student
societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and
recreational activities]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
105 |
17.9% |
0.1785714 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
483 |
82.1% |
0.8214286 |
r6fr1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Education, training and research
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools
including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only
in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools.
Universities and university colleges. Vocational/technical education.
Adult education and further education. Research and development]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Education, training and research |
45 |
7.7% |
0.07653061 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
543 |
92.3% |
0.92346939 |
r6fr1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Health, nursing and rescue work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home.
Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions.
Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and
ambulance services]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
31 |
5.3% |
0.05272109 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
557 |
94.7% |
0.94727891 |
r6fr1_6
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Social services and substance abuse care
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian
Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People’s Aid. Family
counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled.
Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer centres]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
38 |
6.5% |
0.06462585 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
550 |
93.5% |
0.93537415 |
r6fr1_7
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental
protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection.
Veterinary services]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
14 |
2.4% |
0.02380952 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
574 |
97.6% |
0.97619048 |
r6fr1_8
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Residents’ associations, community associations and local
neighbourhood
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
[Meeting house]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
96 |
16.3% |
0.1632653 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
492 |
83.7% |
0.8367347 |
r6fr1_9
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
73 |
12.4% |
0.1241497 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
515 |
87.6% |
0.8758503 |
r6fr1_10
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Rights, support and advocacy work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women’s rights.
Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners,
the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
22 |
3.7% |
0.03741497 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
566 |
96.3% |
0.96258503 |
r6fr1_11
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Political parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties [Youth political parties]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Political parties |
15 |
2.6% |
0.0255102 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
573 |
97.4% |
0.9744898 |
r6fr1_12
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: International exchange, emergency help, assistance and
human rights work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
[International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief
and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
22 |
3.7% |
0.03741497 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
566 |
96.3% |
0.96258503 |
r6fr1_13
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee
organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations.
Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
47 |
8.0% |
0.07993197 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
541 |
92.0% |
0.92006803 |
r6fr1_14
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations
linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other
religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the
Norwegian Humanist Association]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
43 |
7.3% |
0.07312925 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
545 |
92.7% |
0.92687075 |
r6fr1_15
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Immigrant organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background,
culture, identity outside Norway]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Immigrant organisations |
8 |
1.4% |
0.01360544 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
580 |
98.6% |
0.98639456 |
r6fr1_16
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Other, specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify |
11 |
1.9% |
0.01870748 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
577 |
98.1% |
0.98129252 |
r6fr1_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6fr1_17
|
Variable label:
|
No, not volunteering
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
207 |
35.2% |
0.3520408 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
381 |
64.8% |
0.6479592 |
r6fri40
|
Variable label:
|
Done voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations last 12 months
|
|
Literal question:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out any voluntary, unpaid
work for voluntary organisations?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
278 |
46.8% |
0.468013468 |
| 2 |
No |
311 |
52.4% |
0.523569024 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.8% |
0.008417508 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4265 |
|
NA |
r6frii2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Art and Culture, band and choir
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied
arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums,
collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and
artistic activities]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
69 |
24.8% |
0.2482014 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
209 |
75.2% |
0.7517986 |
r6frii2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Athletics and sport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle
club, company sports and disabled sports]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Athletics and sport |
98 |
35.3% |
0.352518 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
180 |
64.7% |
0.647482 |
r6frii2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts.
Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners’ clubs. Student
societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and
recreational activities]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
68 |
24.5% |
0.2446043 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
210 |
75.5% |
0.7553957 |
r6frii2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Education, training and research
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools
including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only
in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools.
Universities and university colleges. Vocational/technical education.
Adult education and further education. Research and development]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Education, training and research |
40 |
14.4% |
0.1438849 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
238 |
85.6% |
0.8561151 |
r6frii2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Health, nursing and rescue work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home.
Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions.
Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and
ambulance services]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
15 |
5.4% |
0.05395683 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
263 |
94.6% |
0.94604317 |
r6frii2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Social services and substance abuse care
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian
Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People’s Aid. Family
counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled.
Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer centres]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
33 |
11.9% |
0.118705 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
245 |
88.1% |
0.881295 |
r6frii2_7
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental
protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection.
Veterinary services]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
12 |
4.3% |
0.04316547 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
266 |
95.7% |
0.95683453 |
r6frii2_8
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Residents’ associations, community associations and local
neighbourhood
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
[Meeting house]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
56 |
20.1% |
0.2014388 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
222 |
79.9% |
0.7985612 |
r6frii2_9
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
28 |
10.1% |
0.1007194 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
250 |
89.9% |
0.8992806 |
r6frii2_10
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Rights, support and advocacy work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women’s rights.
Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners,
the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
11 |
4.0% |
0.03956835 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
267 |
96.0% |
0.96043165 |
r6frii2_11
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Political parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties [Youth political parties]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Political parties |
16 |
5.8% |
0.05755396 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
262 |
94.2% |
0.94244604 |
r6frii2_12
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: International exchange, emergency help, assistance and
human rights work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
[International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief
and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
14 |
5.0% |
0.05035971 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
264 |
95.0% |
0.94964029 |
r6frii2_13
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee
organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations.
Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
21 |
7.6% |
0.07553957 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
257 |
92.4% |
0.92446043 |
r6frii2_14
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations
linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other
religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the
Norwegian Humanist Association]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
47 |
16.9% |
0.1690647 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
231 |
83.1% |
0.8309353 |
r6frii2_15
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Immigrant organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background,
culture, identity outside Norway]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Immigrant organisations |
5 |
1.8% |
0.01798561 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
273 |
98.2% |
0.98201439 |
r6frii2_16
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Other, specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify |
12 |
4.3% |
0.04316547 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
266 |
95.7% |
0.95683453 |
r6frii2_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6frii2_17
|
Variable label:
|
No, not volunteering
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary
organisations in the last 12 months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
2 |
0.7% |
0.007194245 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
276 |
99.3% |
0.992805755 |
r6friii1
|
Variable label:
|
How much time spent voluntering during an ordinary week, last year
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the last year as a whole, roughly how much time did
you spend on voluntary work during an ordinary week?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I do not undertake voluntary work |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 2 |
Less than half an hour |
56 |
20.7% |
0.206642066 |
| 3 |
Between half an hour and one hour |
48 |
17.7% |
0.177121771 |
| 4 |
1 to 2 hours |
62 |
22.9% |
0.228782288 |
| 5 |
2 to 5 hours |
58 |
21.4% |
0.214022140 |
| 6 |
More than 5 hours |
41 |
15.1% |
0.151291513 |
| 7 |
Not sure |
5 |
1.8% |
0.018450185 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003690037 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4588 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_1
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Art and
Culture, band and choir
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
3 |
2.0% |
0.02040816 |
| 2 |
More than half |
12 |
8.2% |
0.08163265 |
| 3 |
About half |
12 |
8.2% |
0.08163265 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
43 |
29.3% |
0.29251701 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
73 |
49.7% |
0.49659864 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.7% |
0.02721088 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4712 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_2
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media:
Athletics and sport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
5 |
2.3% |
0.02262443 |
| 2 |
More than half |
13 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
| 3 |
About half |
25 |
11.3% |
0.11312217 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
57 |
25.8% |
0.25791855 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
118 |
53.4% |
0.53393665 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01357466 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4638 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_3
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media:
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
3 |
1.7% |
0.01734104 |
| 2 |
More than half |
10 |
5.8% |
0.05780347 |
| 3 |
About half |
19 |
11.0% |
0.10982659 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
51 |
29.5% |
0.29479769 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
85 |
49.1% |
0.49132948 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.9% |
0.02890173 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4686 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_4
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media:
Education, training and research
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
More than half |
9 |
10.6% |
0.10588235 |
| 3 |
About half |
11 |
12.9% |
0.12941176 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
19 |
22.4% |
0.22352941 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
39 |
45.9% |
0.45882353 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
8.2% |
0.08235294 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4774 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_5
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Health,
nursing and rescue work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
1 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
| 2 |
More than half |
1 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
| 3 |
About half |
7 |
15.2% |
0.15217391 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
13 |
28.3% |
0.28260870 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
20 |
43.5% |
0.43478261 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
8.7% |
0.08695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4813 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_6
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Social
services and substance abuse care
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
2 |
2.8% |
0.02816901 |
| 2 |
More than half |
4 |
5.6% |
0.05633803 |
| 3 |
About half |
4 |
5.6% |
0.05633803 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
14 |
19.7% |
0.19718310 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
43 |
60.6% |
0.60563380 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
5.6% |
0.05633803 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4788 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_7
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Nature,
environmental and animal protection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
1 |
3.8% |
0.03846154 |
| 2 |
More than half |
6 |
23.1% |
0.23076923 |
| 3 |
About half |
9 |
34.6% |
0.34615385 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
5 |
19.2% |
0.19230769 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
5 |
19.2% |
0.19230769 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4833 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_8
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media:
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
2 |
1.3% |
0.01315789 |
| 2 |
More than half |
7 |
4.6% |
0.04605263 |
| 3 |
About half |
17 |
11.2% |
0.11184211 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
43 |
28.3% |
0.28289474 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
78 |
51.3% |
0.51315789 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
3.3% |
0.03289474 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4707 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_9
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Housing
co-operatives and housing associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
3 |
3.0% |
0.02970297 |
| 2 |
More than half |
4 |
4.0% |
0.03960396 |
| 3 |
About half |
17 |
16.8% |
0.16831683 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
17 |
16.8% |
0.16831683 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
57 |
56.4% |
0.56435644 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
3.0% |
0.02970297 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4758 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_10
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Rights,
support and advocacy work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
More than half |
8 |
24.2% |
0.24242424 |
| 3 |
About half |
4 |
12.1% |
0.12121212 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
5 |
15.2% |
0.15151515 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
15 |
45.5% |
0.45454545 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
3.0% |
0.03030303 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4826 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_11
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media:
Political parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
1 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
| 2 |
More than half |
4 |
12.9% |
0.12903226 |
| 3 |
About half |
5 |
16.1% |
0.16129032 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
11 |
35.5% |
0.35483871 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
9 |
29.0% |
0.29032258 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4828 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_12
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media:
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
6 |
16.7% |
0.16666667 |
| 2 |
More than half |
2 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
| 3 |
About half |
5 |
13.9% |
0.13888889 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
10 |
27.8% |
0.27777778 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
11 |
30.6% |
0.30555556 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4823 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_13
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media:
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
2 |
2.9% |
0.02941176 |
| 2 |
More than half |
3 |
4.4% |
0.04411765 |
| 3 |
About half |
14 |
20.6% |
0.20588235 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
27 |
39.7% |
0.39705882 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
21 |
30.9% |
0.30882353 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
1.5% |
0.01470588 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4791 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_14
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media:
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
1 |
1.1% |
0.01111111 |
| 2 |
More than half |
8 |
8.9% |
0.08888889 |
| 3 |
About half |
4 |
4.4% |
0.04444444 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
19 |
21.1% |
0.21111111 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
57 |
63.3% |
0.63333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
1.1% |
0.01111111 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4769 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_15
|
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media:
Immigrant organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the
organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the
internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events
or activities, invitations to events
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked
about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All of it |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
More than half |
2 |
15.4% |
0.15384615 |
| 3 |
About half |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 4 |
Less than half |
5 |
38.5% |
0.38461538 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
5 |
38.5% |
0.38461538 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4846 |
|
NA |
r6fri42_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Volunteers provide something different from what
professionals offer
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are some statements below about organised voluntary work. To what
extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Volunteers provide something different from what professionals offer,
such as a different type of commitment or experience of life
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
1.3% |
0.01260504 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
31 |
2.6% |
0.02605042 |
| 3 |
Agree |
595 |
50.0% |
0.50000000 |
| 4 |
Strongly agree |
461 |
38.7% |
0.38739496 |
| 5 |
Don't know |
67 |
5.6% |
0.05630252 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6fri42_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Would be no need for voluntary work if the public sector took
full responsibility
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are some statements below about organised voluntary work. To what
extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the public sector took full responsibility, there would be no need
for voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
350 |
29.4% |
0.29411765 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
663 |
55.7% |
0.55714286 |
| 3 |
Agree |
71 |
6.0% |
0.05966387 |
| 4 |
Strongly agree |
32 |
2.7% |
0.02689076 |
| 5 |
Don't know |
54 |
4.5% |
0.04537815 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.7% |
0.01680672 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6fri42_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Moral responsibility to do voluntary work during your life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are some statements below about organised voluntary work. To what
extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Doing voluntary work during your life is a moral responsibility that
everyone has
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
4.1% |
0.04117647 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
184 |
15.5% |
0.15462185 |
| 3 |
Agree |
511 |
42.9% |
0.42941176 |
| 4 |
Strongly agree |
329 |
27.6% |
0.27647059 |
| 5 |
Don't know |
96 |
8.1% |
0.08067227 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6fri42_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Voluntary work a threat to paid work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are some statements below about organised voluntary work. To what
extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Voluntary work is a threat to paid work and is used so as to be able to
cut society’s expenses
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
521 |
43.8% |
0.43781513 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
539 |
45.3% |
0.45294118 |
| 3 |
Agree |
39 |
3.3% |
0.03277311 |
| 4 |
Strongly agree |
25 |
2.1% |
0.02100840 |
| 5 |
Don't know |
44 |
3.7% |
0.03697479 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.8% |
0.01848739 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6fri42_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Voluntary work helps people to have an active role in a
democratic society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are some statements below about organised voluntary work. To what
extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Voluntary work helps people to have an active role in a democratic
society
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02521008 |
| 3 |
Agree |
523 |
43.9% |
0.43949580 |
| 4 |
Strongly agree |
540 |
45.4% |
0.45378151 |
| 5 |
Don't know |
55 |
4.6% |
0.04621849 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1179] [Invalid:3680]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
581 |
49.3% |
0.4927905 |
| 2 |
2 |
598 |
50.7% |
0.5072095 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3680 |
|
NA |
r6friva_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: I am enthusiastic about my voluntary work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am enthusiastic about my voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
59 |
10.2% |
0.101549053 |
| 2 |
Agree |
204 |
35.1% |
0.351118761 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
99 |
17.0% |
0.170395869 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
148 |
25.5% |
0.254733219 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
11 |
1.9% |
0.018932874 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
15 |
2.6% |
0.025817556 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
0.5% |
0.005163511 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
7.2% |
0.072289157 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4278 |
|
NA |
r6friva_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Always want to engage in voluntary work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I always want to engage in voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
5.0% |
0.04991394 |
| 2 |
Agree |
110 |
18.9% |
0.18932874 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
159 |
27.4% |
0.27366609 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
141 |
24.3% |
0.24268503 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
52 |
9.0% |
0.08950086 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
46 |
7.9% |
0.07917384 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
1.4% |
0.01376936 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
6.2% |
0.06196213 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4278 |
|
NA |
r6friva_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Time flies when I am doing voluntary work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Time flies when I am doing voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
32 |
5.5% |
0.055077453 |
| 2 |
Agree |
139 |
23.9% |
0.239242685 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
127 |
21.9% |
0.218588640 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
194 |
33.4% |
0.333907057 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
25 |
4.3% |
0.043029260 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
20 |
3.4% |
0.034423408 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
0.9% |
0.008605852 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
6.7% |
0.067125645 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4278 |
|
NA |
r6friva_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: I feel forced to participate more than I want to
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel forced to participate more than I want to
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006884682 |
| 2 |
Agree |
21 |
3.6% |
0.036144578 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
69 |
11.9% |
0.118760757 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
163 |
28.1% |
0.280550775 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
94 |
16.2% |
0.161790017 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
146 |
25.1% |
0.251290878 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
7.9% |
0.079173838 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
6.5% |
0.065404475 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4278 |
|
NA |
r6friva_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Doing voluntary work has a detrimental effect on other things
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that doing voluntary work has a detrimental effect on other
things
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
6 |
1.0% |
0.01032702 |
| 2 |
Agree |
36 |
6.2% |
0.06196213 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
99 |
17.0% |
0.17039587 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
158 |
27.2% |
0.27194492 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
67 |
11.5% |
0.11531842 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
148 |
25.5% |
0.25473322 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
5.3% |
0.05335628 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
6.2% |
0.06196213 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4278 |
|
NA |
r6friva_6
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: My involvement is not appreciated
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that my involvement is not appreciated
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006884682 |
| 2 |
Agree |
16 |
2.8% |
0.027538726 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
26 |
4.5% |
0.044750430 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
163 |
28.1% |
0.280550775 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
64 |
11.0% |
0.110154905 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
198 |
34.1% |
0.340791738 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
72 |
12.4% |
0.123924269 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
6.5% |
0.065404475 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4278 |
|
NA |
r6friiv1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution to the refugee situation: Donation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last year. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Donation (e.g. money/clothing/equipment)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Donation (e.g. money/clothing/equipment) |
411 |
34.5% |
0.34537815 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01008403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
767 |
64.5% |
0.64453782 |
r6friiv1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution to the refugee situation: Physical contribution
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last year. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Physical contribution (e.g. given out food/clothing/equipment directly
to refugees)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Physical contribution (e.g. given out food/clothing/equipment directly to
refugees) |
37 |
3.1% |
0.03109244 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01008403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1141 |
95.9% |
0.95882353 |
r6friiv1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution to the refugee situation: Administrative contribution
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last year. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Administrative contribution (e.g. coordinated action/information work)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Administrative contribution (e.g. coordinated action/information work) |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02521008 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01008403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1148 |
96.5% |
0.96470588 |
r6friiv1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution to the refugee situation: Other form of contribution
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last year. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other form of contribution; specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other form of contribution, specify: |
48 |
4.0% |
0.04033613 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01008403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1130 |
95.0% |
0.94957983 |
r6friiv1_4_other
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution to the refugee situation: Other form of contribution [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last year. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other form of contribution; specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6friiv1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution to the refugee situation: No
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last year. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
No, none of these
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No, none of these |
707 |
59.4% |
0.59411765 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01008403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
471 |
39.6% |
0.39579832 |
r6friiv2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution in Norway or abroad? Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Did you make the contribution in Norway or abroad? More than one answer
possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway |
437 |
95.0% |
0.95 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
23 |
5.0% |
0.05 |
r6friiv2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution in Norway or abroad? Abroad
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Did you make the contribution in Norway or abroad? More than one answer
possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Abroad; specify country:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Abroad; specify country: |
30 |
6.5% |
0.06521739 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
430 |
93.5% |
0.93478261 |
r6friiv2_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution in Norway or abroad? Abroad [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Did you make the contribution in Norway or abroad? More than one answer
possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Abroad; specify country:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one
or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6friiv3_1
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Gave money
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gave money
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gave money |
314 |
68.3% |
0.6826087 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
146 |
31.7% |
0.3173913 |
r6friiv3_2
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Gave clothing/equipment/food
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gave clothing/equipment/food
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gave clothing/equipment/food |
216 |
47.0% |
0.4695652 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
244 |
53.0% |
0.5304348 |
r6friiv3_3
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Gave out clothing/equipment/food directly to
refugees
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gave out clothing/equipment/food directly to refugees
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gave out clothing/equipment/food directly to refugees |
14 |
3.0% |
0.03043478 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
446 |
97.0% |
0.96956522 |
r6friiv3_4
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Acted as visiting friend/social contact
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Acted as visiting friend/social contact
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Acted as visiting friend/social contact |
20 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
440 |
95.7% |
0.95652174 |
r6friiv3_5
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Helped with homework/lessons
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Helped with homework/lessons
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Helped with homework/lessons |
9 |
2.0% |
0.01956522 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
451 |
98.0% |
0.98043478 |
r6friiv3_6
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Organised gatherings
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Organised gatherings
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Organised gatherings |
13 |
2.8% |
0.02826087 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
447 |
97.2% |
0.97173913 |
r6friiv3_7
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Helped with teaching Norwegian/other teaching
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Helped with teaching Norwegian/other teaching
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Helped with teaching Norwegian/other teaching |
18 |
3.9% |
0.03913043 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
442 |
96.1% |
0.96086957 |
r6friiv3_8
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Helped with organisation and activities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Helped with organisation and activities (e.g. at asylum seekers’ centre)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Helped with organisation and activities (e.g. at asylum seekers’ centre) |
18 |
3.9% |
0.03913043 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
442 |
96.1% |
0.96086957 |
r6friiv3_9
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Housed refugees at home
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housed refugees at home
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housed refugees at home |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01521739 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
453 |
98.5% |
0.98478261 |
r6friiv3_10
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Administered/coordinated volunteers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Administered/coordinated volunteers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Administered/coordinated volunteers |
12 |
2.6% |
0.02608696 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
448 |
97.4% |
0.97391304 |
r6friiv3_11
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Information work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Information work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Information work |
21 |
4.6% |
0.04565217 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
439 |
95.4% |
0.95434783 |
r6friiv3_12
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Editing/moderating websites
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Editing/moderating websites (inc. social media)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Editing/moderating websites (inc. social media) |
2 |
0.4% |
0.004347826 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
458 |
99.6% |
0.995652174 |
r6friiv3_13
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
17 |
3.7% |
0.03695652 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
443 |
96.3% |
0.96304348 |
r6friiv3_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Other [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one
or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6friiv4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: A traditional voluntary
organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee
situation? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
A traditional voluntary organisation (e.g. Red Cross, Norwegian People’s
Aid)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A traditional voluntary organisation (e.g. Red Cross, Norwegian People's Aid) |
275 |
59.8% |
0.5978261 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
185 |
40.2% |
0.4021739 |
r6friiv4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: A newly-formed
initiative/organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee
situation? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
A newly-formed initiative/organisation (e.g. Refugees Welcome to Norway,
Drop in the Ocean)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A newly-formed initiative/organisation (e.g. Refugees Welcome to Norway, Drop in
the Ocean) |
52 |
11.3% |
0.1130435 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
408 |
88.7% |
0.8869565 |
r6friiv4_3
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: A public body
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee
situation? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
A public body (municipality, agency etc.)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A public body (municipality, agency etc.) |
35 |
7.6% |
0.07608696 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
425 |
92.4% |
0.92391304 |
r6friiv4_4
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: A private body
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee
situation? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
A private body
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A private body |
69 |
15.0% |
0.15 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
391 |
85.0% |
0.85 |
r6friiv4_5
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: An asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee
situation? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
An asylum seekers’ centre (public or private)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
An asylum seekers’ centre (public or private) |
22 |
4.8% |
0.04782609 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
438 |
95.2% |
0.95217391 |
r6friiv4_6
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: On own initiative/together
with friends and family
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee
situation? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Organised work on own initiative/together with friends and family
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Organised work on own initiative/together with friends and family |
42 |
9.1% |
0.09130435 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
418 |
90.9% |
0.90869565 |
r6friiv4_7
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee
situation? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
31 |
6.7% |
0.0673913 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
429 |
93.3% |
0.9326087 |
r6friiv4_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Other [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee
situation? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one
or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6friiv5_1
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by an organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by an organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by an organisation |
120 |
26.1% |
0.2608696 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
340 |
73.9% |
0.7391304 |
r6friiv5_2
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via a Facebook group
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via a Facebook group; specify which group:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited via a Facebook group; specify which group: |
20 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
440 |
95.7% |
0.95652174 |
r6friiv5_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via a Facebook group [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via a Facebook group; specify which group:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one
or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6friiv5_3
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via the municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via the municipality in which I live
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited via the municipality in which I live |
14 |
3.0% |
0.03043478 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
446 |
97.0% |
0.96956522 |
r6friiv5_4
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via an asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via an asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited via an asylum seekers’ centre |
3 |
0.7% |
0.006521739 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
457 |
99.3% |
0.993478261 |
r6friiv5_5
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via a private company
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via a private company
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited via a private company |
4 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
456 |
99.1% |
0.991304348 |
r6friiv5_6
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by my own workplace/place of
study
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by my own workplace/place of study
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by my own workplace/place of study |
19 |
4.1% |
0.04130435 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
441 |
95.9% |
0.95869565 |
r6friiv5_7
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by close friends
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by close friends
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by close friends |
49 |
10.7% |
0.1065217 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
411 |
89.3% |
0.8934783 |
r6friiv5_8
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by acquaintances
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by acquaintances
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by acquaintances |
41 |
8.9% |
0.08913043 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
419 |
91.1% |
0.91086957 |
r6friiv5_9
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by other persons
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by other persons
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by other persons |
21 |
4.6% |
0.04565217 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
439 |
95.4% |
0.95434783 |
r6friiv5_10
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Took the initiative myself
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Took the initiative myself
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Took the initiative myself |
189 |
41.1% |
0.4108696 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
271 |
58.9% |
0.5891304 |
r6friiv5_11
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
34 |
7.4% |
0.07391304 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
426 |
92.6% |
0.92608696 |
r6friiv5_11_other
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Other [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More
than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one
or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6friiv6_1
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: Through a voluntary organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to
the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Through a voluntary organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Through a voluntary organisation |
128 |
27.8% |
0.278260870 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
331 |
72.0% |
0.719565217 |
r6friiv6_2
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: Coverage in media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to
the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Advertising or coverage in newspapers, online newspapers, TV or radio
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Advertising or coverage in newspapers, online newspapers, TV or radio |
163 |
35.4% |
0.354347826 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
296 |
64.3% |
0.643478261 |
r6friiv6_3
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: By e-mail
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to
the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
By e-mail
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
By e-mail |
28 |
6.1% |
0.060869565 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
431 |
93.7% |
0.936956522 |
r6friiv6_4
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: On Facebook
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to
the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
On Facebook
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
On Facebook |
108 |
23.5% |
0.234782609 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
351 |
76.3% |
0.763043478 |
r6friiv6_5
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: Other social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to
the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
On other social media (e.g. Twitter)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
On other social media (e.g. Twitter) |
8 |
1.7% |
0.017391304 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
451 |
98.0% |
0.980434783 |
r6friiv6_6
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: Other websites
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to
the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
On other websites
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
On other websites |
19 |
4.1% |
0.041304348 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
440 |
95.7% |
0.956521739 |
r6friiv6_7
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: By SMS text
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to
the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
By SMS text
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
By SMS text |
35 |
7.6% |
0.076086957 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
424 |
92.2% |
0.921739130 |
r6friiv6_8
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: By telephone
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to
the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
By telephone
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
By telephone |
20 |
4.3% |
0.043478261 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
439 |
95.4% |
0.954347826 |
r6friiv6_9
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: By face-to-face contact
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to
the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
By face-to-face contact
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
By face-to-face contact |
86 |
18.7% |
0.186956522 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
373 |
81.1% |
0.810869565 |
r6friiv6_10
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: Other places
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to
the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other places; specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or
more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other places; specify: |
24 |
5.2% |
0.052173913 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
435 |
94.6% |
0.945652174 |
r6friiv6_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: Other places [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to
the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other places; specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one
or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6frivb_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: I am enthusiastic about my voluntary work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am enthusiastic about my voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
53 |
8.9% |
0.08862876 |
| 2 |
Agree |
161 |
26.9% |
0.26923077 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
108 |
18.1% |
0.18060201 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
169 |
28.3% |
0.28260870 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
9 |
1.5% |
0.01505017 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
23 |
3.8% |
0.03846154 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
2.3% |
0.02341137 |
| 97 |
No answer |
61 |
10.2% |
0.10200669 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6frivb_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Always want to engage in voluntary work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I always want to engage in voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
28 |
4.7% |
0.04682274 |
| 2 |
Agree |
96 |
16.1% |
0.16053512 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
131 |
21.9% |
0.21906355 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
155 |
25.9% |
0.25919732 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
60 |
10.0% |
0.10033445 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
51 |
8.5% |
0.08528428 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
25 |
4.2% |
0.04180602 |
| 97 |
No answer |
52 |
8.7% |
0.08695652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6frivb_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Time flies when I am doing voluntary work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Time flies when I am doing voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
5.2% |
0.05183946 |
| 2 |
Agree |
113 |
18.9% |
0.18896321 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
93 |
15.6% |
0.15551839 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
229 |
38.3% |
0.38294314 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
29 |
4.8% |
0.04849498 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
27 |
4.5% |
0.04515050 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
2.0% |
0.02006689 |
| 97 |
No answer |
64 |
10.7% |
0.10702341 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6frivb_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: I feel forced to participate more than I want to
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel forced to participate more than I want to
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
7 |
1.2% |
0.01170569 |
| 2 |
Agree |
25 |
4.2% |
0.04180602 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
51 |
8.5% |
0.08528428 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
180 |
30.1% |
0.30100334 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
67 |
11.2% |
0.11204013 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
146 |
24.4% |
0.24414716 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
59 |
9.9% |
0.09866221 |
| 97 |
No answer |
63 |
10.5% |
0.10535117 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6frivb_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Doing voluntary work has a detrimental effect on other things
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that doing voluntary work has a detrimental effect on other
things
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
13 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
| 2 |
Agree |
44 |
7.4% |
0.07357860 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
91 |
15.2% |
0.15217391 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
161 |
26.9% |
0.26923077 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
56 |
9.4% |
0.09364548 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
130 |
21.7% |
0.21739130 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
43 |
7.2% |
0.07190635 |
| 97 |
No answer |
60 |
10.0% |
0.10033445 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6frivb_6
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: My involvement is not appreciated
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that my involvement is not appreciated
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
9 |
1.5% |
0.01505017 |
| 2 |
Agree |
12 |
2.0% |
0.02006689 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
23 |
3.8% |
0.03846154 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
184 |
30.8% |
0.30769231 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
56 |
9.4% |
0.09364548 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
176 |
29.4% |
0.29431438 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
71 |
11.9% |
0.11872910 |
| 97 |
No answer |
67 |
11.2% |
0.11204013 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6ran4
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1242] [Invalid:3617]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
596 |
48.0% |
0.4798712 |
| 2 |
2 |
646 |
52.0% |
0.5201288 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3617 |
|
NA |
r6km62a
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the word antibiotics? [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the word antibiotics?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran4=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6km62b
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the words antibiotics-resistant bacteria?
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the words antibiotics-resistant
bacteria?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran4=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6km236
|
Variable label:
|
Concern about climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very concerned |
141 |
11.3% |
0.112890312 |
| 2 |
Concerned |
408 |
32.7% |
0.326661329 |
| 3 |
Somewhat concerned |
447 |
35.8% |
0.357886309 |
| 4 |
Slightly concerned |
196 |
15.7% |
0.156925540 |
| 5 |
Not concerned at all |
48 |
3.8% |
0.038430745 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007205765 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
37 |
3.0% |
0.02962370 |
| 2 |
Agree |
172 |
13.8% |
0.13771017 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
490 |
39.2% |
0.39231385 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
276 |
22.1% |
0.22097678 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
136 |
10.9% |
0.10888711 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
97 |
7.8% |
0.07766213 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
28 |
2.2% |
0.02241793 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.0% |
0.01040833 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Citizens of rich countries should cut their consumption
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption
as part of the solution to the climate challenge.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
204 |
16.3% |
0.16333066 |
| 2 |
Agree |
373 |
29.9% |
0.29863891 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
381 |
30.5% |
0.30504404 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
106 |
8.5% |
0.08486789 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
67 |
5.4% |
0.05364291 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
73 |
5.8% |
0.05844676 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
2.5% |
0.02481986 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.1% |
0.01120897 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km63
|
Variable label:
|
Climate change, statement closest to your views
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements comes closest to your views regarding
the reasons for climate change:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Climate change is only caused by natural processes |
15 |
1.2% |
0.012009608 |
| 2 |
Climate change is primarily caused by natural processes |
82 |
6.6% |
0.065652522 |
| 3 |
Climate change is caused partly by natural processes and partly by people |
606 |
48.5% |
0.485188151 |
| 4 |
Climate change is primarily caused by people |
484 |
38.8% |
0.387510008 |
| 5 |
Climate change is only caused by people |
28 |
2.2% |
0.022417934 |
| 6 |
There is no climate change |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001601281 |
| 7 |
Don't know |
20 |
1.6% |
0.016012810 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.0% |
0.009607686 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km64
|
Variable label:
|
Climate change, positive/negative for Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change will affect each country in different ways.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative do you think climate change will be for Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Only positive |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007205765 |
| 2 |
More positive than negative |
150 |
12.0% |
0.120096077 |
| 3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
289 |
23.1% |
0.231385108 |
| 4 |
More negative than positive |
729 |
58.4% |
0.583666934 |
| 5 |
Only negative |
50 |
4.0% |
0.040032026 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.8% |
0.017614091 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km21_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings when it comes to climate change: Hope
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hope
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
79 |
6.3% |
0.06325060 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
213 |
17.1% |
0.17053643 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
672 |
53.8% |
0.53803042 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
234 |
18.7% |
0.18734988 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
15 |
1.2% |
0.01200961 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
2.9% |
0.02882306 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km21_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings when it comes to climate change: Sadness
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sadness
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
168 |
13.5% |
0.13450761 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
319 |
25.5% |
0.25540432 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
533 |
42.7% |
0.42674139 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
162 |
13.0% |
0.12970376 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
28 |
2.2% |
0.02241793 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
3.1% |
0.03122498 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km21_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings when it comes to climate change: Fear
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
200 |
16.0% |
0.16012810 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
417 |
33.4% |
0.33386709 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
475 |
38.0% |
0.38030424 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
94 |
7.5% |
0.07526021 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
23 |
1.8% |
0.01841473 |
| 97 |
No answer |
40 |
3.2% |
0.03202562 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km21_4
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings when it comes to climate change: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
300 |
24.0% |
0.24019215 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
411 |
32.9% |
0.32906325 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
364 |
29.1% |
0.29143315 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
106 |
8.5% |
0.08486789 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
23 |
1.8% |
0.01841473 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
3.6% |
0.03602882 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km21_5
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings when it comes to climate change: Guilt
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Guilt
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
251 |
20.1% |
0.200960769 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
426 |
34.1% |
0.341072858 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
472 |
37.8% |
0.377902322 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
50 |
4.0% |
0.040032026 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007205765 |
| 97 |
No answer |
41 |
3.3% |
0.032826261 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km65
|
Variable label:
|
For or against: Norway being part of Paris Agreement
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In Paris in December 2015, most countries came to an international
agreement to limit global warming to less than two degrees.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you for or against Norway being part of this agreement?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly against |
27 |
2.2% |
0.02161729 |
| 2 |
Somewhat against |
30 |
2.4% |
0.02401922 |
| 3 |
Neither for nor against |
197 |
15.8% |
0.15772618 |
| 4 |
Somewhat for |
295 |
23.6% |
0.23618895 |
| 5 |
Strongly for |
683 |
54.7% |
0.54683747 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.4% |
0.01361089 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
rankm66
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. A randomization variable that determines whether the
answerlist in R6KM66 is displayed in order or in reversed order.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. A randomization variable that determines whether the
answerlist in R6KM66 is displayed in order or in reversed order.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1242] [Invalid:3617]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In order |
621 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| 2 |
In flipped order |
621 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3617 |
|
NA |
r6km66
|
Variable label:
|
Attitude: Development in the petroleum industry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Production of oil and gas is an important industry for Norway. The
industry provides many jobs and considerable income for society. At the
same time, burning fossil energy is the main cause of climate change and
activities on the Norwegian continental shelf contribute about 1/4 of
Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. Opening new areas is also
controversial because it can affect life in the sea and at the ice edge.
The political parties have different opinions about how the petroleum
industry should be developed over the next 20 to 30 years. There is
disagreement over both how large the industry should be and whether new
areas should be opened.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to your view?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ranKM66 determines whether the answerlist in R6KM66
is displayed in order or in reversed order.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be as developed as possible. We should
open up to new search areas and if possible facilitate further growth. |
71 |
5.7% |
0.05684548 |
| 2 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be as developed as it is today. We should
make environmental considerations like we do today, and open up new search areas
where environmentally justifiable, while encouraging to maintain the industry. |
470 |
37.6% |
0.37630104 |
| 3 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be less developed than today. We should
therefore not open up new areas, and searches should be limited to areas where
activity has already been established. |
380 |
30.4% |
0.30424339 |
| 4 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be considerably less developed than
today. We should therefore not allow searches for new resources, and we should
only permit production in existing fields until they have been depleted. |
198 |
15.9% |
0.15852682 |
| 5 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be discontinued. We should therefore
not allow searches for new fields. The production in existing fields should be
reduced considerably within the next 5 years and closed down within the course
of the time period. |
86 |
6.9% |
0.06885508 |
| 97 |
No answer |
44 |
3.5% |
0.03522818 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km66_open
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts about Norwegian oil and gas industry [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you would like to share some completely anonymous thoughts about the
Norwegian oil and gas industry, you are welcome to do so here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6ran5_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1237] [Invalid:3622]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
613 |
49.6% |
0.4955538 |
| 2 |
2 |
624 |
50.4% |
0.5044462 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3622 |
|
NA |
r6ran5_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1237] [Invalid:3622]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
626 |
50.6% |
0.5060631 |
| 2 |
2 |
611 |
49.4% |
0.4939369 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3622 |
|
NA |
r6ran5_3
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1237] [Invalid:3622]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
628 |
50.8% |
0.5076799 |
| 2 |
2 |
609 |
49.2% |
0.4923201 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3622 |
|
NA |
r6ran5_4
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1237] [Invalid:3622]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
632 |
51.1% |
0.5109135 |
| 2 |
2 |
605 |
48.9% |
0.4890865 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3622 |
|
NA |
r6km67_1
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Tighten up the regulations governing permitted
industrial CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe by cutting the number of
quotas available to industry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe
that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be
disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement.
How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten up the regulations governing permitted industrial CO2 emissions
in Norway and Europe by cutting the number of quotas available to
industry.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_1 or
R6KM67_2 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
59 |
9.6% |
0.09624796 |
| 2 |
Positive |
184 |
30.0% |
0.30016313 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
184 |
30.0% |
0.30016313 |
| 4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
121 |
19.7% |
0.19738989 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
21 |
3.4% |
0.03425775 |
| 6 |
Negative |
16 |
2.6% |
0.02610114 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
7 |
1.1% |
0.01141925 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
3.4% |
0.03425775 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4246 |
|
NA |
r6km67_2
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Tighten up the regulations governing total
permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Europe
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe
that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be
disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement.
How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten up the regulations governing total permitted industrial CO2
emissions in Norway and Europe.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_1 or
R6KM67_2 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
98 |
15.7% |
0.15705128 |
| 2 |
Positive |
227 |
36.4% |
0.36378205 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
166 |
26.6% |
0.26602564 |
| 4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
81 |
13.0% |
0.12980769 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
17 |
2.7% |
0.02724359 |
| 6 |
Negative |
9 |
1.4% |
0.01442308 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
10 |
1.6% |
0.01602564 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4235 |
|
NA |
r6km67_3
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or
underground
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe
that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be
disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement.
How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or
underground.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_3 or
R6KM67_4 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
34 |
5.4% |
0.05431310 |
| 2 |
Positive |
136 |
21.7% |
0.21725240 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
133 |
21.2% |
0.21246006 |
| 4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
207 |
33.1% |
0.33067093 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
49 |
7.8% |
0.07827476 |
| 6 |
Negative |
29 |
4.6% |
0.04632588 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
15 |
2.4% |
0.02396166 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
3.7% |
0.03674121 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4233 |
|
NA |
r6km67_4
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or
underground, such as the “moon landing” project at Mongstad
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe
that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be
disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement.
How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or
underground, such as the so-called “moon landing” project at Mongstad.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_3 or
R6KM67_4 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
30 |
4.9% |
0.04909984 |
| 2 |
Positive |
125 |
20.5% |
0.20458265 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
134 |
21.9% |
0.21931260 |
| 4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
195 |
31.9% |
0.31914894 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
47 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
| 6 |
Negative |
33 |
5.4% |
0.05400982 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
20 |
3.3% |
0.03273322 |
| 97 |
No answer |
27 |
4.4% |
0.04418985 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4248 |
|
NA |
r6km67_5
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Increase funding for renewable energy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe
that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be
disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement.
How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase funding for research on and development of renewable energy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_5 or
R6KM67_6 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
271 |
43.2% |
0.431528662 |
| 2 |
Positive |
233 |
37.1% |
0.371019108 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
67 |
10.7% |
0.106687898 |
| 4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
31 |
4.9% |
0.049363057 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
4 |
0.6% |
0.006369427 |
| 6 |
Negative |
2 |
0.3% |
0.003184713 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001592357 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
3.0% |
0.030254777 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4231 |
|
NA |
r6km67_6
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Increase funding for renewable energy, even
though this means less money for other purposes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe
that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be
disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement.
How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase funding for research on and development of renewable energy,
even if this means that less money is available for other important
purposes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_5 or
R6KM67_6 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
147 |
24.1% |
0.241379310 |
| 2 |
Positive |
212 |
34.8% |
0.348111658 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
168 |
27.6% |
0.275862069 |
| 4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
51 |
8.4% |
0.083743842 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
15 |
2.5% |
0.024630542 |
| 6 |
Negative |
2 |
0.3% |
0.003284072 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006568144 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.6% |
0.016420361 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4250 |
|
NA |
r6km67_7
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Increased government support for geothermal
energy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe
that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be
disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement.
How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increased government support for developing geothermal energy where one
drills down to the geothermal energy under the Earth’s surface.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents are asked R6KM67_7, long as u=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
216 |
17.3% |
0.172938351 |
| 2 |
Positive |
485 |
38.8% |
0.388310649 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
244 |
19.5% |
0.195356285 |
| 4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
221 |
17.7% |
0.176941553 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
19 |
1.5% |
0.015212170 |
| 6 |
Negative |
10 |
0.8% |
0.008006405 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003202562 |
| 97 |
No answer |
50 |
4.0% |
0.040032026 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km67_8
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Attempt to change weather and climate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe
that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be
disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement.
How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Attempt to change the weather and climate by, for example, sending up
sulphur particles to block the sunlight. This measure would probably
reduce the temperature on Earth for a certain time, but would not help
with problems such as ocean acidification
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_8 or
R6KM67_9 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
Positive |
10 |
1.6% |
0.01582278 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
23 |
3.6% |
0.03639241 |
| 4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
131 |
20.7% |
0.20727848 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
100 |
15.8% |
0.15822785 |
| 6 |
Negative |
175 |
27.7% |
0.27689873 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
168 |
26.6% |
0.26582278 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
4.0% |
0.03955696 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4227 |
|
NA |
r6km67_9
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Attempt to change weather and climate,
artificial volcano
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe
that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be
disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement.
How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Attempt to change the weather and climate by, for example, sending up
sulphur particles to block the sunlight. This could work as a kind of
artificial volcano. During the course of history, major volcanic
eruptions have reduced the temperature on Earth for a period. This
measure would probably reduce the temperature on Earth for a certain
time, but would not help with problems such as ocean acidification
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_8 or
R6KM67_9 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
Positive |
10 |
1.7% |
0.01652893 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
16 |
2.6% |
0.02644628 |
| 4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
153 |
25.3% |
0.25289256 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
81 |
13.4% |
0.13388430 |
| 6 |
Negative |
169 |
27.9% |
0.27933884 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
161 |
26.6% |
0.26611570 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
2.5% |
0.02479339 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4254 |
|
NA |
r6km68
|
Variable label:
|
Heard about this proposal to let part of the world’s coal, oil and gas
stay in the ground/under the seabed?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people have said recently that only part of the world’s coal, oil
and gas can be used if the climate is to be kept relatively stable, and
have proposed that the rest must remain underground or below the seabed.
Others have said that the world needs reliable, cheap energy and that we
therefore need to continue to use coal, oil and gas.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard about this proposal to let part of the world’s coal, oil
and gas stay in the ground or under the seabed?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I have heard about it. |
618 |
49.5% |
0.49479584 |
| 2 |
No, I have not heard about it. |
600 |
48.0% |
0.48038431 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
2.5% |
0.02481986 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km69
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad decision that the Oil Fund should sell its investments in
companies involved in coal
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In 2015, the Norwegian parliament (the Storting) decided that the
Government Pension Fund Global (the “Oil Fund”) should sell its
investments in companies involved in coal mining and coal-fired power.
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, was this a good or a bad decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
234 |
18.7% |
0.18734988 |
| 2 |
Good |
435 |
34.8% |
0.34827862 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
191 |
15.3% |
0.15292234 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
255 |
20.4% |
0.20416333 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
56 |
4.5% |
0.04483587 |
| 6 |
Bad |
29 |
2.3% |
0.02321857 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
13 |
1.0% |
0.01040833 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
2.9% |
0.02882306 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6trans1
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you read/hear the words ‘transgender persons’? [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you read or hear the words transgender person?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6ran15
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1228] [Invalid:3631]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
340 |
27.7% |
0.2768730 |
| 2 |
2 |
305 |
24.8% |
0.2483713 |
| 3 |
3 |
289 |
23.5% |
0.2353420 |
| 4 |
4 |
294 |
23.9% |
0.2394137 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3631 |
|
NA |
r6trans2a
|
Variable label:
|
Requirement for changing legal gender: Most common rules
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people have a gender identity or gender expression that differs
from the norm for their biological gender. These are often called
transgender persons. Many transgender persons wish to change their legal
gender so that their official documents (passport, driving licence etc.)
are in accordance with their perceived gender identity.
What is required for a person to be allowed to change legal gender
varies from country to country. The list below gives the most common
rules.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these rules do you think should apply in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran15=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Requirement for sterilisation, diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment |
7 |
2.1% |
0.02058824 |
| 2 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment |
44 |
12.9% |
0.12941176 |
| 3 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual |
63 |
18.5% |
0.18529412 |
| 4 |
No absolute requirements, the person decides |
186 |
54.7% |
0.54705882 |
| 5 |
It should not be possible to change legal gender |
28 |
8.2% |
0.08235294 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
3.5% |
0.03529412 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4519 |
|
NA |
r6trans2b
|
Variable label:
|
Requirement for changing legal gender: Most common rules + where they
apply
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people have a gender identity or gender expression that differs
from the norm for their biological gender. These are often called
transgender persons. Many transgender persons wish to change their legal
gender so that their official documents (passport, driving licence etc.)
are in accordance with their perceived gender identity.
What is required for a person to be allowed to change legal gender
varies from country to country. The list below gives the most common
rules and examples of where these rules apply.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these rules do you think should apply in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran15=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Requirement for sterilisation, diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment
(practised in Romania and Slovenia for example). |
3 |
1.0% |
0.009836066 |
| 2 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment (practised in
Sweden, Spain and Estonia for example). |
41 |
13.4% |
0.134426230 |
| 3 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual (practised in Austria, the Netherlands
and Germany for example). |
72 |
23.6% |
0.236065574 |
| 4 |
No absolute requirements, the person decides after reaching the age of 16
(practised in Denmark, Argentina and Malta for example). |
144 |
47.2% |
0.472131148 |
| 5 |
It should not be possible to change legal gender |
27 |
8.9% |
0.088524590 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
5.9% |
0.059016393 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6trans2c
|
Variable label:
|
Requirement for changing legal gender: Most common rules + where they
apply (Norway included)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people have a gender identity or gender expression that differs
from the norm for their biological gender. These are often called
transgender persons. Many transgender persons wish to change their legal
gender so that their official documents (passport, driving licence etc.)
are in accordance with their perceived gender identity.
What is required for a person to be allowed to change legal gender
varies from country to country. The list below gives the most common
rules and examples of where these rules apply.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these rules do you think should apply in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran15=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Requirement for sterilisation, diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment
(the current practice in Norway) |
50 |
17.3% |
0.17301038 |
| 2 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment (practised in
Sweden, Spain and Estonia for example). |
39 |
13.5% |
0.13494810 |
| 3 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual (practised in Austria, the Netherlands
and Germany for example). |
38 |
13.1% |
0.13148789 |
| 4 |
No absolute requirements, the person decides after reaching the age of 16
(practised in Denmark, Argentina and Malta for example). |
128 |
44.3% |
0.44290657 |
| 5 |
It should not be possible to change legal gender |
23 |
8.0% |
0.07958478 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
3.8% |
0.03806228 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4570 |
|
NA |
r6trans2d
|
Variable label:
|
Requirement for changing legal gender: Most common rules + where they
apply (Norway included) + changing the rules in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people have a gender identity or gender expression that differs
from the norm for their biological gender. These are often called
transgender persons. Many transgender persons wish to change their legal
gender so that their official documents (passport, driving licence etc.)
are in accordance with their perceived gender identity.
What is required for a person to be allowed to change legal gender
varies from country to country. The list below gives the most common
rules and examples of where these rules apply. In Norway a process is
currently under way to change the rules. The proposed law is that
persons aged over 16 should decide their legal gender themselves.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these rules do you think should apply in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran15=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Requirement for sterilisation, diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment
(practised in Norway, Romania and Slovenia for example). |
11 |
3.7% |
0.03741497 |
| 2 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment (practised in
Sweden, Spain and Estonia for example). |
18 |
6.1% |
0.06122449 |
| 3 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual (practised in Austria, the Netherlands
and Germany for example). |
30 |
10.2% |
0.10204082 |
| 4 |
No absolute requirements, the person decides after reaching the age of 16
(practised in Denmark, Argentina and Malta for example). This is the new
proposal in Norway. |
193 |
65.6% |
0.65646259 |
| 5 |
It should not be possible to change legal gender |
27 |
9.2% |
0.09183673 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
5.1% |
0.05102041 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4565 |
|
NA |
r6ran16
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1225] [Invalid:3634]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
426 |
34.8% |
0.3477551 |
| 2 |
2 |
413 |
33.7% |
0.3371429 |
| 3 |
3 |
386 |
31.5% |
0.3151020 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3634 |
|
NA |
r6trans3a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Should introduce the possibility of putting “A” in
passport
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce the
possibility of putting “A” (for annet - other) as a third gender
alternative in the passport, in addition to “M” (man) and “K” (kvinne -
woman)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran16=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
34 |
8.0% |
0.079812207 |
| 2 |
Agree |
64 |
15.0% |
0.150234742 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
35 |
8.2% |
0.082159624 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
102 |
23.9% |
0.239436620 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
35 |
8.2% |
0.082159624 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
76 |
17.8% |
0.178403756 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
76 |
17.8% |
0.178403756 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009389671 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4433 |
|
NA |
r6trans3b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Should introduce the possibility of putting “A” in
passport, working to secure a change
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Organisations for transgender persons are working to secure a change in
which persons who do not identify as either a man or a woman have a
third alternative (A for annet - other) in passports and other official
documents.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce the
possibility of putting “A” (for annet - other) as a third gender
alternative in the passport, in addition to “M” (man) and “K” (kvinne -
woman)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran16=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
27 |
6.5% |
0.06537530 |
| 2 |
Agree |
68 |
16.5% |
0.16464891 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
50 |
12.1% |
0.12106538 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
96 |
23.2% |
0.23244552 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
40 |
9.7% |
0.09685230 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
62 |
15.0% |
0.15012107 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
58 |
14.0% |
0.14043584 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.9% |
0.02905569 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4446 |
|
NA |
r6trans3c
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Should introduce the possibility of putting “A” in
passport, working to secure a change, number of countries have
introduced it
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Organisations for transgender persons are working to secure a change in
which persons who do not identify as either a man or a woman have a
third alternative (A for annet - other) in passports and other official
documents. A number of countries have introduced such an arrangement.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce the
possibility of putting “A” (for annet - other) as a third gender
alternative in the passport, in addition to “M” (man) and “K” (kvinne -
woman)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran16=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
35 |
9.1% |
0.09067358 |
| 2 |
Agree |
72 |
18.7% |
0.18652850 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
39 |
10.1% |
0.10103627 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
112 |
29.0% |
0.29015544 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
24 |
6.2% |
0.06217617 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
54 |
14.0% |
0.13989637 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
45 |
11.7% |
0.11658031 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.3% |
0.01295337 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4473 |
|
NA |
r6ran17
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1222] [Invalid:3637]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
392 |
32.1% |
0.3207856 |
| 2 |
2 |
436 |
35.7% |
0.3567921 |
| 3 |
3 |
394 |
32.2% |
0.3224223 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3637 |
|
NA |
r6leg1a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Risk of persecution because of sexual orientation should
be a basis for a residence permit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some persons who seek asylum receive a residence permit in Norway
because they risk persecution in their home country because of their
sexual orientation (homosexual/lesbian/bisexual) or gender identity
(transgender).
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that the risk of persecution because
of sexual orientation or gender identity should be a basis for a
residence permit in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran17=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
51 |
13.0% |
0.13010204 |
| 2 |
Agree |
105 |
26.8% |
0.26785714 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
89 |
22.7% |
0.22704082 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
53 |
13.5% |
0.13520408 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
35 |
8.9% |
0.08928571 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
26 |
6.6% |
0.06632653 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
29 |
7.4% |
0.07397959 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.0% |
0.01020408 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4467 |
|
NA |
r6leg1b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Risk of persecution because of sexual orientation should
be a basis for a residence permit, accordance with current Norwegian law
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some persons who seek asylum receive a residence permit in Norway
because they risk persecution in their home country because of their
sexual orientation (homosexual/lesbian/bisexual) or gender identity
(transgender). This is in accordance with current Norwegian law.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that the risk of persecution because
of sexual orientation or gender identity should be a basis for a
residence permit in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran17=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
79 |
18.1% |
0.181192661 |
| 2 |
Agree |
125 |
28.7% |
0.286697248 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
81 |
18.6% |
0.185779817 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
47 |
10.8% |
0.107798165 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
32 |
7.3% |
0.073394495 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
43 |
9.9% |
0.098623853 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
25 |
5.7% |
0.057339450 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009174312 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4423 |
|
NA |
r6leg1c
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Risk of persecution because of sexual orientation should
be a basis for a residence permit, accordance with current Norwegian law
+ similiar laws in other European countries
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some persons who seek asylum receive a residence permit in Norway
because they risk persecution in their home country because of their
sexual orientation (homosexual/lesbian/bisexual) or gender identity
(transgender). This is in accordance with current Norwegian law. There
are similar laws in many other European countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that the risk of persecution because
of sexual orientation or gender identity should be a basis for a
residence permit in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran17=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
74 |
18.8% |
0.18781726 |
| 2 |
Agree |
124 |
31.5% |
0.31472081 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
86 |
21.8% |
0.21827411 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
39 |
9.9% |
0.09898477 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
26 |
6.6% |
0.06598985 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
27 |
6.9% |
0.06852792 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
3.0% |
0.03045685 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.5% |
0.01522843 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4465 |
|
NA |
r6leg2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Should prioritise asylum seekers who are
homosexual/lesbian/transgender
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should prioritise accepting asylum seekers who are
homosexual/lesbian/bisexual/transgender because they are particularly
vulnerable to maltreatment and discrimination in refugee camps in their
neighbouring countries.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
58 |
4.6% |
0.04643715 |
| 2 |
Agree |
201 |
16.1% |
0.16092874 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
268 |
21.5% |
0.21457166 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
282 |
22.6% |
0.22578062 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
127 |
10.2% |
0.10168135 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
152 |
12.2% |
0.12169736 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
117 |
9.4% |
0.09367494 |
| 97 |
No answer |
44 |
3.5% |
0.03522818 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6leg2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Should be possible to send asylum seekers who are
homosexual/lesbain/transgender if they can avoid persecution and
discrimination by hiding their orientation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It should be possible to send asylum seekers who are
homosexual/lesbian/bisexual/transgender back to their home countries if
they can avoid persecution and discrimination there by hiding their
orientation.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
60 |
4.8% |
0.04803843 |
| 2 |
Agree |
117 |
9.4% |
0.09367494 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
135 |
10.8% |
0.10808647 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
254 |
20.3% |
0.20336269 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
220 |
17.6% |
0.17614091 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
267 |
21.4% |
0.21377102 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
145 |
11.6% |
0.11609287 |
| 97 |
No answer |
51 |
4.1% |
0.04083267 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6leg2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Those who state sexual orientation as the reason they have
left are telling the truth
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
There is reason to believe that most of those who state sexual
orientation as the reason they have left their home country and are
seeking asylum in Norway are telling the truth.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
38 |
3.0% |
0.03042434 |
| 2 |
Agree |
217 |
17.4% |
0.17373899 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
161 |
12.9% |
0.12890312 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
460 |
36.8% |
0.36829464 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
160 |
12.8% |
0.12810248 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
110 |
8.8% |
0.08807046 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
56 |
4.5% |
0.04483587 |
| 97 |
No answer |
47 |
3.8% |
0.03763010 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6ran18
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1222] [Invalid:3637]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
387 |
31.7% |
0.3166939 |
| 2 |
2 |
433 |
35.4% |
0.3543372 |
| 3 |
3 |
402 |
32.9% |
0.3289689 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3637 |
|
NA |
r6dv73a
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion of: Right of reservation from abortion
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The question of health personnel being able to reserve themselves
from taking part in abortions is controversial in many countries.
In Norway a proposal has been put forward to increase the possibility of
general practitioners reserving themselves from giving referrals for
abortion.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion of this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran18=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree. Doctors should be fully allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
34 |
8.8% |
0.0878553 |
| 2 |
Partly agree. Doctors should in some cases be allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
84 |
21.7% |
0.2170543 |
| 3 |
Strongly disagree. Doctors should not be allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
264 |
68.2% |
0.6821705 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.3% |
0.0129199 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4472 |
|
NA |
r6dv73b
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion of: Right of reservation from abortion, anti-abortion-activists
wants to make it hard for women to obtain legal abortion
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The question of health personnel being able to reserve themselves
from taking part in abortions is controversial in many countries.
Anti-abortion activists worldwide are working to strengthen the right
to reservation and that health personnel and institutions should reserve
themselves, so as to make it difficult for women to obtain legal
abortions. In many parts of Latin America it is practically impossible
to obtain a legal abortion because so many have used the right to
reservation.
In Norway a proposal has been put forward to increase the possibility of
general practitioners reserving themselves from giving referrals for
abortion.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion of this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran18=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree. Doctors should be fully allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
44 |
10.2% |
0.10161663 |
| 2 |
Partly agree. Doctors should in some cases be allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
100 |
23.1% |
0.23094688 |
| 3 |
Strongly disagree. Doctors should not be allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
279 |
64.4% |
0.64434180 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.3% |
0.02309469 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4426 |
|
NA |
r6dv73c
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion of: Right of reservation from abortion, campaigners for a strong
right of reservation concerned about doctors being compelled to act
counter to their religious/ethical convictions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The question of health personnel being able to reserve themselves
from taking part in abortions is controversial in many countries.
Campaigners for a strong right of reservation are concerned about
doctors and other health workers being compelled to act counter to their
religious or ethical convictions or having to give up their jobs.
In Norway a proposal has been put forward to increase the possibility of
general practitioners reserving themselves from giving referrals for
abortion.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion of this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran18=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree. Doctors should be fully allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
51 |
12.7% |
0.12686567 |
| 2 |
Partly agree. Doctors should in some cases be allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
95 |
23.6% |
0.23631841 |
| 3 |
Strongly disagree. Doctors should not be allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
250 |
62.2% |
0.62189055 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.5% |
0.01492537 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4457 |
|
NA |
r6ran6
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1163] [Invalid:3696]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
383 |
32.9% |
0.3293207 |
| 2 |
2 |
378 |
32.5% |
0.3250215 |
| 3 |
3 |
402 |
34.6% |
0.3456578 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3696 |
|
NA |
r6pad1a
|
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of taking vaccine
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a new infectious disease has arisen in the world and that
it is on its way to Norway. Those who are infected get flu-like
symptoms, but usually become completely well again. A few deaths have
been recorded due to the virus, and there is a fear that it might mutate
and become dangerous for many more people. A vaccine against the disease
has been developed, but has not been fully tested with regard to side
effects.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would take the vaccine in such a situation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran6=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
23 |
6.0% |
0.06005222 |
| 2 |
Likely |
58 |
15.1% |
0.15143603 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
103 |
26.9% |
0.26892950 |
| 4 |
Slightly likely |
151 |
39.4% |
0.39425587 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
48 |
12.5% |
0.12532637 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4476 |
|
NA |
r6pad1b
|
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of taking vaccine, part of the population not vaccinated and
is dependent on most of the population taking it
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a new infectious disease has arisen in the world and
that it is on its way to Norway. Those who are infected get flu-like
symptoms, but usually become completely well again. A few deaths have
been recorded due to the virus, and there is a fear that it might mutate
and become dangerous for many more people. A vaccine against the disease
has been developed, but has not been fully tested with regard to side
effects.
There will always be part of the population that is not vaccinated due
to their young age, allergy or poor health. This group is entirely
dependent on most of the population being vaccinated, so that they are
not infected.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would take the vaccine in such a situation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran6=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
89 |
23.5% |
0.235449735 |
| 2 |
Likely |
103 |
27.2% |
0.272486772 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
106 |
28.0% |
0.280423280 |
| 4 |
Slightly likely |
54 |
14.3% |
0.142857143 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
24 |
6.3% |
0.063492063 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4481 |
|
NA |
r6pad1c
|
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of taking vaccine, your own body stimulates rapid
mobilisation against disease by taking the vaccine
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a new infectious disease has arisen in the world and
that it is on its way to Norway. Those who are infected get flu-like
symptoms, but usually become completely well again. A few deaths have
been recorded due to the virus, and there is a fear that it might mutate
and become dangerous for many more people. A vaccine against the disease
has been developed, but has not been fully tested with regard to side
effects.
The vaccine stimulates your body to rapid mobilisation against the
disease, thus keeping you healthy.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would take the vaccine in such a situation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran6=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
47 |
11.7% |
0.116915423 |
| 2 |
Likely |
73 |
18.2% |
0.181592040 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
116 |
28.9% |
0.288557214 |
| 4 |
Slightly likely |
122 |
30.3% |
0.303482587 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
43 |
10.7% |
0.106965174 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002487562 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4457 |
|
NA |
r6ran7
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1163] [Invalid:3696]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
305 |
26.2% |
0.2622528 |
| 2 |
2 |
292 |
25.1% |
0.2510748 |
| 3 |
3 |
274 |
23.6% |
0.2355976 |
| 4 |
4 |
292 |
25.1% |
0.2510748 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3696 |
|
NA |
r6pad2a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Interested to read about issue
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in
Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree
with the following statements about the article:
|
|
Literal question:
|
This is an issue I would be very interested to read about on a normal
day.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
7 |
2.3% |
0.02295082 |
| 2 |
Agree |
36 |
11.8% |
0.11803279 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
50 |
16.4% |
0.16393443 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
50 |
16.4% |
0.16393443 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
40 |
13.1% |
0.13114754 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
65 |
21.3% |
0.21311475 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
16.1% |
0.16065574 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.6% |
0.02622951 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad2a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Issue is about the Conservative Party and Erna Solberg
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in
Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree
with the following statements about the article:
|
|
Literal question:
|
This issue is about the Conservative political party and prime minister
Erna Solberg.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
13 |
4.3% |
0.04262295 |
| 2 |
Agree |
59 |
19.3% |
0.19344262 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
50 |
16.4% |
0.16393443 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
77 |
25.2% |
0.25245902 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
34 |
11.1% |
0.11147541 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
42 |
13.8% |
0.13770492 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
22 |
7.2% |
0.07213115 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.6% |
0.02622951 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad2b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Interested to read about issue
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in
Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree
with the following statements about the article:
|
|
Literal question:
|
This is an issue I would be very interested to read about on a normal
day.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
| 2 |
Agree |
23 |
7.9% |
0.078767123 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
42 |
14.4% |
0.143835616 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
62 |
21.2% |
0.212328767 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
29 |
9.9% |
0.099315068 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
74 |
25.3% |
0.253424658 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
53 |
18.2% |
0.181506849 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.4% |
0.023972603 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad2b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Issue is about the Conservative Party and Erna Solberg
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in
Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree
with the following statements about the article:
|
|
Literal question:
|
This issue is about the Conservative political party and prime minister
Erna Solberg.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
21 |
7.2% |
0.07191781 |
| 2 |
Agree |
60 |
20.5% |
0.20547945 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
43 |
14.7% |
0.14726027 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
74 |
25.3% |
0.25342466 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
28 |
9.6% |
0.09589041 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
36 |
12.3% |
0.12328767 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
26 |
8.9% |
0.08904110 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01369863 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad2c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Interested to read about issue
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in
Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree
with the following statements about the article:
|
|
Literal question:
|
This is an issue I would be very interested to read about on a normal
day.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
10 |
3.6% |
0.03649635 |
| 2 |
Agree |
28 |
10.2% |
0.10218978 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
40 |
14.6% |
0.14598540 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
36 |
13.1% |
0.13138686 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
34 |
12.4% |
0.12408759 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
67 |
24.5% |
0.24452555 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
48 |
17.5% |
0.17518248 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
4.0% |
0.04014599 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad2c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Issue is about the Conservative Party and Erna Solberg
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in
Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree
with the following statements about the article:
|
|
Literal question:
|
This issue is about the Conservative political party and prime minister
Erna Solberg.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
10.6% |
0.10583942 |
| 2 |
Agree |
45 |
16.4% |
0.16423358 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
46 |
16.8% |
0.16788321 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
53 |
19.3% |
0.19343066 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
28 |
10.2% |
0.10218978 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
53 |
19.3% |
0.19343066 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
4.4% |
0.04379562 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02919708 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad2d_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Interested to read about issue
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in
Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree
with the following statements about the article:
|
|
Literal question:
|
This is an issue I would be very interested to read about on a normal
day.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01712329 |
| 2 |
Agree |
38 |
13.0% |
0.13013699 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
35 |
12.0% |
0.11986301 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
69 |
23.6% |
0.23630137 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
40 |
13.7% |
0.13698630 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
64 |
21.9% |
0.21917808 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
38 |
13.0% |
0.13013699 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.0% |
0.01027397 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad2d_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Issue is about the Conservative Party and Erna Solberg
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in
Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree
with the following statements about the article:
|
|
Literal question:
|
This issue is about the Conservative political party and prime minister
Erna Solberg.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
16 |
5.5% |
0.05479452 |
| 2 |
Agree |
50 |
17.1% |
0.17123288 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
46 |
15.8% |
0.15753425 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
85 |
29.1% |
0.29109589 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
30 |
10.3% |
0.10273973 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
45 |
15.4% |
0.15410959 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
5.1% |
0.05136986 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01712329 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the information in the Norwegian online newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I generally trust the information that is given in the Norwegian online
newspapers that I read.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
Agree |
47 |
15.4% |
0.15409836 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
98 |
32.1% |
0.32131148 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
48 |
15.7% |
0.15737705 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
68 |
22.3% |
0.22295082 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
32 |
10.5% |
0.10491803 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
2.6% |
0.02622951 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01311475 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad3a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the journalists’ work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the journalists’ work in general.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 2 |
Agree |
45 |
14.8% |
0.147540984 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
89 |
29.2% |
0.291803279 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
14.1% |
0.140983607 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
80 |
26.2% |
0.262295082 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
40 |
13.1% |
0.131147541 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
1.6% |
0.016393443 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.0% |
0.009836066 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad3a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the newspaper to mark what is advertising and what is
editorial
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the newspapers to clearly mark what is advertising and what is
editorial.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006557377 |
| 2 |
Agree |
41 |
13.4% |
0.134426230 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
58 |
19.0% |
0.190163934 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
52 |
17.0% |
0.170491803 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
89 |
29.2% |
0.291803279 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
42 |
13.8% |
0.137704918 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
4.6% |
0.045901639 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.3% |
0.022950820 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad3a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: If just seen a real piece, trusts other news from the same
newspaper
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the piece I just saw had been real, I would have trusted other news
from the same newspaper.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
Agree |
28 |
9.2% |
0.09180328 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
67 |
22.0% |
0.21967213 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
94 |
30.8% |
0.30819672 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
60 |
19.7% |
0.19672131 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
38 |
12.5% |
0.12459016 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
2.3% |
0.02295082 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
3.6% |
0.03606557 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad3a_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Easy to see what is advertising and what is editorial in
Norwegian online newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is easy to see the difference between what is advertising and what is
editorial in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
8 |
2.6% |
0.02622951 |
| 2 |
Agree |
47 |
15.4% |
0.15409836 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
83 |
27.2% |
0.27213115 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
37 |
12.1% |
0.12131148 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
85 |
27.9% |
0.27868852 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
32 |
10.5% |
0.10491803 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
1.6% |
0.01639344 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.6% |
0.02622951 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad3b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the information in the Norwegian online newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I generally trust the information that is given in the Norwegian online
newspapers that I read.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003424658 |
| 2 |
Agree |
49 |
16.8% |
0.167808219 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
93 |
31.8% |
0.318493151 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
38 |
13.0% |
0.130136986 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
63 |
21.6% |
0.215753425 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
35 |
12.0% |
0.119863014 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
2.7% |
0.027397260 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.7% |
0.017123288 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the journalists’ work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the journalists’ work in general.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
| 2 |
Agree |
44 |
15.1% |
0.150684932 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
85 |
29.1% |
0.291095890 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
38 |
13.0% |
0.130136986 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
59 |
20.2% |
0.202054795 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
47 |
16.1% |
0.160958904 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
3.1% |
0.030821918 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.7% |
0.027397260 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the newspaper to mark what is advertising and what is
editorial
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the newspapers to clearly mark what is advertising and what is
editorial.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
7 |
2.4% |
0.02397260 |
| 2 |
Agree |
30 |
10.3% |
0.10273973 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
54 |
18.5% |
0.18493151 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
14.7% |
0.14726027 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
83 |
28.4% |
0.28424658 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
54 |
18.5% |
0.18493151 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
5.1% |
0.05136986 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02054795 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: If just seen a real piece, trusts other news from the same
newspaper
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the piece I just saw had been real, I would have trusted other news
from the same newspaper.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
| 2 |
Agree |
21 |
7.2% |
0.071917808 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
58 |
19.9% |
0.198630137 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
104 |
35.6% |
0.356164384 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
53 |
18.2% |
0.181506849 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
36 |
12.3% |
0.123287671 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
10 |
3.4% |
0.034246575 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.7% |
0.027397260 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3b_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Easy to see what is advertising and what is editorial in
Norwegian online newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is easy to see the difference between what is advertising and what is
editorial in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003424658 |
| 2 |
Agree |
35 |
12.0% |
0.119863014 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
84 |
28.8% |
0.287671233 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
14.7% |
0.147260274 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
80 |
27.4% |
0.273972603 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
36 |
12.3% |
0.123287671 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
2.7% |
0.027397260 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.7% |
0.017123288 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the information in the Norwegian online newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw.
This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent an
advertisement. Several Norwegian newspapers have introduced such
advertisements that look like editorial.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I generally trust the information that is given in the Norwegian online
newspapers that I read.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
| 2 |
Agree |
34 |
12.4% |
0.12408759 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
70 |
25.5% |
0.25547445 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
15.7% |
0.15693431 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
78 |
28.5% |
0.28467153 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
40 |
14.6% |
0.14598540 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad3c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the journalists’ work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw.
This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent an
advertisement. Several Norwegian newspapers have introduced such
advertisements that look like editorial.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the journalists’ work in general.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02189781 |
| 2 |
Agree |
43 |
15.7% |
0.15693431 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
56 |
20.4% |
0.20437956 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
49 |
17.9% |
0.17883212 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
74 |
27.0% |
0.27007299 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
37 |
13.5% |
0.13503650 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02189781 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad3c_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the newspaper to mark what is advertising and what is
editorial
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw.
This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent an
advertisement. Several Norwegian newspapers have introduced such
advertisements that look like editorial.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the newspapers to clearly mark what is advertising and what is
editorial.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02919708 |
| 2 |
Agree |
32 |
11.7% |
0.11678832 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
60 |
21.9% |
0.21897810 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
41 |
15.0% |
0.14963504 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
58 |
21.2% |
0.21167883 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
60 |
21.9% |
0.21897810 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
4.4% |
0.04379562 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad3c_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: If just seen a real piece, trusts other news from the same
newspaper
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw.
This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent an
advertisement. Several Norwegian newspapers have introduced such
advertisements that look like editorial.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the piece I just saw had been real, I would have trusted other news
from the same newspaper.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
| 2 |
Agree |
16 |
5.8% |
0.05839416 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
56 |
20.4% |
0.20437956 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
99 |
36.1% |
0.36131387 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
51 |
18.6% |
0.18613139 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
36 |
13.1% |
0.13138686 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03284672 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.5% |
0.01459854 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad3c_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Easy to see what is advertising and what is editorial in
Norwegian online newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw.
This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent an
advertisement. Several Norwegian newspapers have introduced such
advertisements that look like editorial.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is easy to see the difference between what is advertising and what is
editorial in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003649635 |
| 2 |
Agree |
25 |
9.1% |
0.091240876 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
62 |
22.6% |
0.226277372 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
30 |
10.9% |
0.109489051 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
82 |
29.9% |
0.299270073 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
54 |
19.7% |
0.197080292 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
6.2% |
0.062043796 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.010948905 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad3d_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the information in the Norwegian online newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw.
This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent a
portrait interview. Several Norwegian newspapers write such portrait
interviews.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I generally trust the information that is given in the Norwegian online
newspapers that I read.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3 |
1.0% |
0.01027397 |
| 2 |
Agree |
38 |
13.0% |
0.13013699 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
74 |
25.3% |
0.25342466 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
58 |
19.9% |
0.19863014 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
57 |
19.5% |
0.19520548 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
43 |
14.7% |
0.14726027 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
11 |
3.8% |
0.03767123 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.7% |
0.02739726 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3d_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the journalists’ work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw.
This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent a
portrait interview. Several Norwegian newspapers write such portrait
interviews.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the journalists’ work in general.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01369863 |
| 2 |
Agree |
33 |
11.3% |
0.11301370 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
74 |
25.3% |
0.25342466 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
49 |
16.8% |
0.16780822 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
65 |
22.3% |
0.22260274 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
47 |
16.1% |
0.16095890 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
4.8% |
0.04794521 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02054795 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3d_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the newspaper to mark what is advertising and what is
editorial
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw.
This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent a
portrait interview. Several Norwegian newspapers write such portrait
interviews.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the newspapers to clearly mark what is advertising and what is
editorial.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01712329 |
| 2 |
Agree |
33 |
11.3% |
0.11301370 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
39 |
13.4% |
0.13356164 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
62 |
21.2% |
0.21232877 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
81 |
27.7% |
0.27739726 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
52 |
17.8% |
0.17808219 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
11 |
3.8% |
0.03767123 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
3.1% |
0.03082192 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3d_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: If just seen a real piece, trusts other news from the same
newspaper
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw.
This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent a
portrait interview. Several Norwegian newspapers write such portrait
interviews.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the piece I just saw had been real, I would have trusted other news
from the same newspaper.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
Agree |
29 |
9.9% |
0.09931507 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
53 |
18.2% |
0.18150685 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
113 |
38.7% |
0.38698630 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
52 |
17.8% |
0.17808219 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
29 |
9.9% |
0.09931507 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
3.1% |
0.03082192 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.4% |
0.02397260 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3d_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Easy to see what is advertising and what is editorial in
Norwegian online newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw.
This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent a
portrait interview. Several Norwegian newspapers write such portrait
interviews.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements
about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is easy to see the difference between what is advertising and what is
editorial in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual
stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01369863 |
| 2 |
Agree |
35 |
12.0% |
0.11986301 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
67 |
22.9% |
0.22945205 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
67 |
22.9% |
0.22945205 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
77 |
26.4% |
0.26369863 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
28 |
9.6% |
0.09589041 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02054795 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.7% |
0.02739726 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_randomQorder
|
Variable label:
|
Part of conjunction experiment. Determines whether R6PAD8A is asked
first, second, or third.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. Determines whether R6PAD8A is asked
first, second, or third.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
First |
347 |
29.9% |
0.2993960 |
| 2 |
Second |
402 |
34.7% |
0.3468507 |
| 3 |
Third |
410 |
35.4% |
0.3537532 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_randomQorder
|
Variable label:
|
Part of conjunction experiment. Determines whether R6PAD8B is asked
first, second, or third.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. Determines whether R6PAD8B is asked
first, second, or third.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
First |
434 |
37.4% |
0.3744607 |
| 2 |
Second |
358 |
30.9% |
0.3088870 |
| 3 |
Third |
367 |
31.7% |
0.3166523 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_randomQorder
|
Variable label:
|
Part of conjunction experiment. Determines whether R6PAD8C is asked
first, second, or third.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. Determines whether R6PAD8C is asked
first, second, or third.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
First |
378 |
32.6% |
0.3261432 |
| 2 |
Second |
399 |
34.4% |
0.3442623 |
| 3 |
Third |
382 |
33.0% |
0.3295945 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_age
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8a: age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
22 years |
173 |
14.9% |
0.1492666 |
| 2 |
30 years |
172 |
14.8% |
0.1484038 |
| 3 |
40 years |
167 |
14.4% |
0.1440897 |
| 4 |
50 years |
152 |
13.1% |
0.1311475 |
| 5 |
60 years |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
| 6 |
70 years |
165 |
14.2% |
0.1423641 |
| 7 |
80 years |
166 |
14.3% |
0.1432269 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_gender
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8a: gender
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Female |
566 |
48.8% |
0.488352 |
| 2 |
Male |
593 |
51.2% |
0.511648 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_region
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8a: region
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nord-Norge |
203 |
17.5% |
0.1751510 |
| 2 |
Midt-Norge |
186 |
16.0% |
0.1604832 |
| 3 |
Vestlandet |
189 |
16.3% |
0.1630716 |
| 4 |
Sørlandet |
214 |
18.5% |
0.1846419 |
| 5 |
Østlandet |
180 |
15.5% |
0.1553063 |
| 6 |
Oslo-området |
187 |
16.1% |
0.1613460 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_relationship
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8a: relationship
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Married |
407 |
35.1% |
0.3511648 |
| 2 |
Living alone |
400 |
34.5% |
0.3451251 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
352 |
30.4% |
0.3037101 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_education
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8a: education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Elementary school |
294 |
25.4% |
0.2536670 |
| 2 |
High school |
288 |
24.8% |
0.2484901 |
| 3 |
University |
292 |
25.2% |
0.2519413 |
| 4 |
Ph.D. |
285 |
24.6% |
0.2459016 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_religion
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8a: religion
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
380 |
32.8% |
0.3278689 |
| 2 |
Christianity |
380 |
32.8% |
0.3278689 |
| 3 |
Islam |
399 |
34.4% |
0.3442623 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_work
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8a: work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nursery employee |
180 |
15.5% |
0.1553063 |
| 2 |
Farmer |
193 |
16.7% |
0.1665229 |
| 3 |
Oil worker |
195 |
16.8% |
0.1682485 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
182 |
15.7% |
0.1570319 |
| 5 |
IT-consultant |
211 |
18.2% |
0.1820535 |
| 6 |
No work experience |
198 |
17.1% |
0.1708369 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_age
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8a: age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
22 years |
158 |
13.6% |
0.1363244 |
| 2 |
30 years |
143 |
12.3% |
0.1233822 |
| 3 |
40 years |
186 |
16.0% |
0.1604832 |
| 4 |
50 years |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
| 5 |
60 years |
157 |
13.5% |
0.1354616 |
| 6 |
70 years |
166 |
14.3% |
0.1432269 |
| 7 |
80 years |
180 |
15.5% |
0.1553063 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_gender
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8a: gender
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Female |
586 |
50.6% |
0.5056083 |
| 2 |
Male |
573 |
49.4% |
0.4943917 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_region
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8a: region
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nord-Norge |
208 |
17.9% |
0.1794651 |
| 2 |
Midt-Norge |
175 |
15.1% |
0.1509922 |
| 3 |
Vestlandet |
188 |
16.2% |
0.1622088 |
| 4 |
Sørlandet |
200 |
17.3% |
0.1725626 |
| 5 |
Østlandet |
196 |
16.9% |
0.1691113 |
| 6 |
Oslo-området |
192 |
16.6% |
0.1656601 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_relationship
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8a: relationship
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Married |
399 |
34.4% |
0.3442623 |
| 2 |
Living alone |
372 |
32.1% |
0.3209664 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
388 |
33.5% |
0.3347714 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_education
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8a: education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Elementary school |
286 |
24.7% |
0.2467645 |
| 2 |
High school |
277 |
23.9% |
0.2389991 |
| 3 |
University |
274 |
23.6% |
0.2364107 |
| 4 |
Ph.D. |
322 |
27.8% |
0.2778257 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_religion
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8a: religion
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
391 |
33.7% |
0.3373598 |
| 2 |
Christianity |
384 |
33.1% |
0.3313201 |
| 3 |
Islam |
384 |
33.1% |
0.3313201 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_work
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8a: work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nursery employee |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
| 2 |
Farmer |
199 |
17.2% |
0.1716997 |
| 3 |
Oil worker |
194 |
16.7% |
0.1673857 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
183 |
15.8% |
0.1578947 |
| 5 |
IT-consultant |
230 |
19.8% |
0.1984469 |
| 6 |
No work experience |
189 |
16.3% |
0.1630716 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_rep1_stance_1
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8b: stance 1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8B variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8B and rep2_8B are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
161 |
13.9% |
0.1389129 |
| 2 |
Agree |
166 |
14.3% |
0.1432269 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
155 |
13.4% |
0.1337360 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
176 |
15.2% |
0.1518550 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
155 |
13.4% |
0.1337360 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
165 |
14.2% |
0.1423641 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
181 |
15.6% |
0.1561691 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_rep1_stance_2
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8b: stance 2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8B variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8B and rep2_8B are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
182 |
15.7% |
0.1570319 |
| 2 |
Agree |
167 |
14.4% |
0.1440897 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
171 |
14.8% |
0.1475410 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
157 |
13.5% |
0.1354616 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
139 |
12.0% |
0.1199310 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
179 |
15.4% |
0.1544435 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_rep1_stance_3
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8b: stance 3
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8B variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8B and rep2_8B are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
172 |
14.8% |
0.1484038 |
| 2 |
Agree |
158 |
13.6% |
0.1363244 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
168 |
14.5% |
0.1449525 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
170 |
14.7% |
0.1466782 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
179 |
15.4% |
0.1544435 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
148 |
12.8% |
0.1276963 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_rep2_stance_1
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8b: stance 1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8B variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8B and rep2_8B are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
165 |
14.2% |
0.1423641 |
| 2 |
Agree |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
159 |
13.7% |
0.1371872 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
158 |
13.6% |
0.1363244 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
167 |
14.4% |
0.1440897 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
172 |
14.8% |
0.1484038 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_rep2_stance_2
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8b: stance 2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8B variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8B and rep2_8B are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
185 |
16.0% |
0.1596204 |
| 2 |
Agree |
182 |
15.7% |
0.1570319 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
152 |
13.1% |
0.1311475 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
161 |
13.9% |
0.1389129 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
165 |
14.2% |
0.1423641 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
152 |
13.1% |
0.1311475 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
162 |
14.0% |
0.1397757 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_rep2_stance_3
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8b: stance 3
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8B variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8B and rep2_8B are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
149 |
12.9% |
0.1285591 |
| 2 |
Agree |
163 |
14.1% |
0.1406385 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
166 |
14.3% |
0.1432269 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
179 |
15.4% |
0.1544435 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
171 |
14.8% |
0.1475410 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
162 |
14.0% |
0.1397757 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_age
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8c: age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
22 years |
148 |
12.8% |
0.1276963 |
| 2 |
30 years |
154 |
13.3% |
0.1328732 |
| 3 |
40 years |
179 |
15.4% |
0.1544435 |
| 4 |
50 years |
162 |
14.0% |
0.1397757 |
| 5 |
60 years |
171 |
14.8% |
0.1475410 |
| 6 |
70 years |
177 |
15.3% |
0.1527179 |
| 7 |
80 years |
168 |
14.5% |
0.1449525 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_gender
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8c: gender
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Female |
598 |
51.6% |
0.515962 |
| 2 |
Male |
561 |
48.4% |
0.484038 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_region
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8c: region
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nord-Norge |
182 |
15.7% |
0.1570319 |
| 2 |
Midt-Norge |
190 |
16.4% |
0.1639344 |
| 3 |
Vestlandet |
198 |
17.1% |
0.1708369 |
| 4 |
Sørlandet |
218 |
18.8% |
0.1880932 |
| 5 |
Østlandet |
194 |
16.7% |
0.1673857 |
| 6 |
Oslo-området |
177 |
15.3% |
0.1527179 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_relationship
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8c: relationship
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Married |
393 |
33.9% |
0.3390854 |
| 2 |
Living alone |
382 |
33.0% |
0.3295945 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
384 |
33.1% |
0.3313201 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_education
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8c: education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Elementary school |
280 |
24.2% |
0.2415876 |
| 2 |
High school |
276 |
23.8% |
0.2381363 |
| 3 |
University |
295 |
25.5% |
0.2545298 |
| 4 |
Ph.D. |
308 |
26.6% |
0.2657463 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_religion
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8c: religion
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
418 |
36.1% |
0.3606557 |
| 2 |
Christianity |
368 |
31.8% |
0.3175151 |
| 3 |
Islam |
373 |
32.2% |
0.3218292 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_work
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8c: work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nursery employee |
170 |
14.7% |
0.1466782 |
| 2 |
Farmer |
213 |
18.4% |
0.1837791 |
| 3 |
Oil worker |
190 |
16.4% |
0.1639344 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
198 |
17.1% |
0.1708369 |
| 5 |
IT-consultant |
209 |
18.0% |
0.1803279 |
| 6 |
No work experience |
179 |
15.4% |
0.1544435 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_stance_1
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8c: stance 1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
125 |
10.8% |
0.1078516 |
| 2 |
Agree |
182 |
15.7% |
0.1570319 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
168 |
14.5% |
0.1449525 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
165 |
14.2% |
0.1423641 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
177 |
15.3% |
0.1527179 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
173 |
14.9% |
0.1492666 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_stance_2
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8c: stance 2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
159 |
13.7% |
0.1371872 |
| 2 |
Agree |
157 |
13.5% |
0.1354616 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
159 |
13.7% |
0.1371872 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
204 |
17.6% |
0.1760138 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
158 |
13.6% |
0.1363244 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
168 |
14.5% |
0.1449525 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
154 |
13.3% |
0.1328732 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_stance_3
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 1 in r6pad8c: stance 3
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
159 |
13.7% |
0.1371872 |
| 2 |
Agree |
160 |
13.8% |
0.1380500 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
166 |
14.3% |
0.1432269 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
181 |
15.6% |
0.1561691 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
167 |
14.4% |
0.1440897 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
162 |
14.0% |
0.1397757 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_age
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8c: age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
22 years |
173 |
14.9% |
0.1492666 |
| 2 |
30 years |
173 |
14.9% |
0.1492666 |
| 3 |
40 years |
160 |
13.8% |
0.1380500 |
| 4 |
50 years |
142 |
12.3% |
0.1225194 |
| 5 |
60 years |
176 |
15.2% |
0.1518550 |
| 6 |
70 years |
183 |
15.8% |
0.1578947 |
| 7 |
80 years |
152 |
13.1% |
0.1311475 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_gender
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8c: gender
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Female |
601 |
51.9% |
0.5185505 |
| 2 |
Male |
558 |
48.1% |
0.4814495 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_region
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8c: region
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nord-Norge |
191 |
16.5% |
0.1647972 |
| 2 |
Midt-Norge |
198 |
17.1% |
0.1708369 |
| 3 |
Vestlandet |
175 |
15.1% |
0.1509922 |
| 4 |
Sørlandet |
197 |
17.0% |
0.1699741 |
| 5 |
Østlandet |
220 |
19.0% |
0.1898188 |
| 6 |
Oslo-området |
178 |
15.4% |
0.1535807 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_relationship
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8c: relationship
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Married |
371 |
32.0% |
0.3201035 |
| 2 |
Living alone |
374 |
32.3% |
0.3226920 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
414 |
35.7% |
0.3572045 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_education
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8c: education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Elementary school |
280 |
24.2% |
0.2415876 |
| 2 |
High school |
304 |
26.2% |
0.2622951 |
| 3 |
University |
273 |
23.6% |
0.2355479 |
| 4 |
Ph.D. |
302 |
26.1% |
0.2605695 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_religion
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8c: religion
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
396 |
34.2% |
0.3416739 |
| 2 |
Christianity |
378 |
32.6% |
0.3261432 |
| 3 |
Islam |
385 |
33.2% |
0.3321829 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_work
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8c: work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nursery employee |
173 |
14.9% |
0.1492666 |
| 2 |
Farmer |
198 |
17.1% |
0.1708369 |
| 3 |
Oil worker |
190 |
16.4% |
0.1639344 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
207 |
17.9% |
0.1786022 |
| 5 |
IT-consultant |
190 |
16.4% |
0.1639344 |
| 6 |
No work experience |
201 |
17.3% |
0.1734254 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_stance_1
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8c: stance 1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
| 2 |
Agree |
168 |
14.5% |
0.1449525 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
139 |
12.0% |
0.1199310 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
185 |
16.0% |
0.1596204 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
150 |
12.9% |
0.1294219 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
184 |
15.9% |
0.1587575 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_stance_2
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8c: stance 2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
187 |
16.1% |
0.1613460 |
| 2 |
Agree |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
163 |
14.1% |
0.1406385 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
160 |
13.8% |
0.1380500 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
151 |
13.0% |
0.1302847 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
158 |
13.6% |
0.1363244 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
176 |
15.2% |
0.1518550 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pac8c_rep2_stance_3
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for
representative 2 in r6pad8c: stance 3
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the
full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are
presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
| 2 |
Agree |
157 |
13.5% |
0.1354616 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
178 |
15.4% |
0.1535807 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
162 |
14.0% |
0.1397757 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
166 |
14.3% |
0.1432269 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
167 |
14.4% |
0.1440897 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
160 |
13.8% |
0.1380500 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representatives with demographic
characteristics.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Choice of political representive 1 of 3
|
|
Literal question:
|
Below we are presenting you with two hypothetical members of parliament
with differing characteristics. Let us say that you have to choose one
of these to represent you in parliament. Please read the description of
each representative carefully. Then, please indicate which
representative you would prefer to represent you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. Note: Part of conjunction experiment. Collects the
preference of the respondents when they are asked to choose between
representative 1 and representative 2. The order of which R6PAD8A-C is
asked, is randomized. The contents of the question is also randomly
determined, based on the r6pad8a_rep variables. See appendix for
question layout. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I prefer representative 1 |
549 |
47.2% |
0.47164948 |
| 2 |
I prefer representative 2 |
557 |
47.9% |
0.47852234 |
| 97 |
No answer |
58 |
5.0% |
0.04982818 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3695 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representatives with political
characteristics.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Choice of political representive 2 of 3
|
|
Literal question:
|
Below we are presenting you with two hypothetical members of parliament
with differing characteristics. Let us say that you have to choose one
of these to represent you in parliament. Please read the description of
each representative carefully. Then, please indicate which
representative you would prefer to represent you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. Note: Part of conjunction experiment. Collects the
preference of the respondents when they are asked to choose between
representative 1 and representative 2. The order of which R6PAD8A-C is
asked, is randomized. The contents of the question is randomly
determined, based on the r6pad8n_rep variables. See appendix for
question layout. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I prefer representative 1 |
566 |
48.6% |
0.4862543 |
| 2 |
I prefer representative 2 |
536 |
46.0% |
0.4604811 |
| 97 |
No answer |
62 |
5.3% |
0.0532646 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3695 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representatives with demographic and
political characteristics.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Choice of political representive 3 of 3
|
|
Literal question:
|
Below we are presenting you with two hypothetical members of parliament
with differing characteristics. Let us say that you have to choose one
of these to represent you in parliament. Please read the description of
each representative carefully. Then, please indicate which
representative you would prefer to represent you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. Note: Part of conjunction experiment. Collects the
preference of the respondents when they are asked to choose between
representative 1 and representative 2. The order of which R6PAD8A-C is
asked, is randomized. The contents of the question is also randomly
determined, based on the r6pad8c_rep variables. See appendix for
question layout. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I prefer representative 1 |
559 |
48.0% |
0.48024055 |
| 2 |
I prefer representative 2 |
545 |
46.8% |
0.46821306 |
| 97 |
No answer |
60 |
5.2% |
0.05154639 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3695 |
|
NA |
r6ran11
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1152] [Invalid:3707]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
561 |
48.7% |
0.4869792 |
| 2 |
2 |
591 |
51.3% |
0.5130208 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3707 |
|
NA |
r6pad9a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Accept more Syrian refugees
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian
refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran11=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
50 |
8.9% |
0.089126560 |
| 2 |
Agree |
115 |
20.5% |
0.204991087 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
134 |
23.9% |
0.238859180 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
70 |
12.5% |
0.124777184 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
79 |
14.1% |
0.140819964 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
50 |
8.9% |
0.089126560 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
60 |
10.7% |
0.106951872 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.5% |
0.005347594 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4298 |
|
NA |
r6pad9b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Accept more Syrian refugees than what has been agreed
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian
refugees over the next two years than has been agreed?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran11=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
47 |
8.0% |
0.079526227 |
| 2 |
Agree |
111 |
18.8% |
0.187817259 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
118 |
20.0% |
0.199661591 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
81 |
13.7% |
0.137055838 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
71 |
12.0% |
0.120135364 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
63 |
10.7% |
0.106598985 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
98 |
16.6% |
0.165820643 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.3% |
0.003384095 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4268 |
|
NA |
r6ran12
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1152] [Invalid:3707]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
548 |
47.6% |
0.4756944 |
| 2 |
2 |
604 |
52.4% |
0.5243056 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3707 |
|
NA |
r6pad10a
|
Variable label:
|
Reasoning for answer about Syrian refugees [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you write the reason for your answer about Syrian refugees?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We want all types of answers. A couple of sentences would be good, or
just a few words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran12=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6pad11
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you have a strong opinion on this question?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you say that you have a strong opinion on this
question?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
148 |
12.7% |
0.127147766 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
381 |
32.7% |
0.327319588 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
504 |
43.3% |
0.432989691 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
101 |
8.7% |
0.086769759 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006013746 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
2.0% |
0.019759450 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3695 |
|
NA |
r6pad12
|
Variable label:
|
How good is your knowledge about the refugee question?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How good do you feel that your knowledge about the refugee question is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good knowledge |
52 |
4.5% |
0.04467354 |
| 2 |
Good knowledge |
469 |
40.3% |
0.40292096 |
| 3 |
Some knowledge |
542 |
46.6% |
0.46563574 |
| 4 |
Not much knowledge |
65 |
5.6% |
0.05584192 |
| 5 |
No knowledge at all |
3 |
0.3% |
0.00257732 |
| 97 |
No answer |
33 |
2.8% |
0.02835052 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3695 |
|
NA |
r6ran32
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1150] [Invalid:3709]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
587 |
51.0% |
0.5104348 |
| 2 |
2 |
563 |
49.0% |
0.4895652 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3709 |
|
NA |
r6pad13a
|
Variable label:
|
How many of Norway’s citizens: Agrees that the country should accept
more Syrian refugees
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to guess, how many of Norway’s citizens do you think would
agree that the country should accept more Syrian refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran32=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Almost all |
7 |
1.2% |
0.01192504 |
| 2 |
About 2 out of 3 |
71 |
12.1% |
0.12095400 |
| 3 |
About half |
220 |
37.5% |
0.37478705 |
| 4 |
About 1 out of 3 |
235 |
40.0% |
0.40034072 |
| 5 |
Almost none |
44 |
7.5% |
0.07495741 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.7% |
0.01703578 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4272 |
|
NA |
r6pad13b
|
Variable label:
|
How many of the people you know: Agrees that the country should accept
more Syrian refugees
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to guess, how many of the people you know do you think would
agree that the country should accept more Syrian refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran32=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Almost all |
26 |
4.6% |
0.04618117 |
| 2 |
About 2 out of 3 |
80 |
14.2% |
0.14209591 |
| 3 |
About half |
179 |
31.8% |
0.31793961 |
| 4 |
About 1 out of 3 |
151 |
26.8% |
0.26820604 |
| 5 |
Almost none |
120 |
21.3% |
0.21314387 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.2% |
0.01243339 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4296 |
|
NA |
r6pad10b
|
Variable label:
|
Reasoning for answer about Syrian refugees [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you write the reason for your answer about Syrian refugees?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We want all types of answers. A couple of sentences would be good, or
just a few words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran12=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6pad14
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion of: Municipalities that have entered into contracts with
companies that provide and maintain for example bus shelters in return
for the companies being allowed to advertise
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Several Norwegian municipalities have in recent years entered into
contracts with companies that provide and maintain bus shelters, city
bicycles and public lavatories in return for the companies being allowed
to advertise in connection with these.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion of this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and if the respondent is inhabitant in a defined group of
municipalities. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am opposed to municipal funding of bus shelters, city bicycles and public
lavatories with the aid of advertising |
142 |
24.7% |
0.24652778 |
| 2 |
I support municipal funding of bus shelters, city bicycles and public lavatories
with the aid of advertising |
419 |
72.7% |
0.72743056 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
2.6% |
0.02604167 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4283 |
|
NA |
r6ran9
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1147] [Invalid:3712]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
292 |
25.5% |
0.2545772 |
| 2 |
2 |
289 |
25.2% |
0.2519616 |
| 3 |
3 |
270 |
23.5% |
0.2353967 |
| 4 |
4 |
296 |
25.8% |
0.2580645 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3712 |
|
NA |
r6pad4a
|
Variable label:
|
Drawn out to win cash prize. Decision 1: How much do you want to give to
a random person?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you and two other
participants can be drawn out to win an extra cash prize of 1,000
kroner. If you are drawn out, you must all make two decisions.
As decision 1, you must choose how much of the 1,000 kroner you would
give a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel. As
decision 2, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the one of the
other two persons who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Decision 1: If you were drawn out, how much of the 1,000 kroner would
you give to a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 kr |
73 |
25.0% |
0.25000000 |
| 2 |
250 kr |
43 |
14.7% |
0.14726027 |
| 3 |
500 kr |
128 |
43.8% |
0.43835616 |
| 4 |
750 kr |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 5 |
1000 kr |
24 |
8.2% |
0.08219178 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
8.2% |
0.08219178 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad4a_beslutning2
|
Variable label:
|
Drawn out to win cash prize. Wish/doesn’t wish to go to decision 2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=1. Asked on the same page as R6PAD4A]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I do not wish to go to Decision 2 |
95 |
32.5% |
0.3253425 |
| 2 |
Go on to Decision 2 |
142 |
48.6% |
0.4863014 |
| 97 |
No answer |
55 |
18.8% |
0.1883562 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad4a1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 0 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=1, and R6PAD4A_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are
presented with a sum of 0 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-2000]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
67 |
47.2% |
0.471830986 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4717 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
69 |
48.6% |
0.485915493 |
| 500 |
|
4 |
2.8% |
0.028169014 |
| 900 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 2000 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
r6pad4a1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 250 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=1, and R6PAD4A_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are
presented with a sum of 250 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1750]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
68 |
47.9% |
0.478873239 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4717 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
52 |
36.6% |
0.366197183 |
| 50 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 100 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 200 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 250 |
|
17 |
12.0% |
0.119718310 |
| 300 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 1750 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
r6pad4a1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 500 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=1, and R6PAD4A_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are
presented with a sum of 500 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1500]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
64 |
45.1% |
0.450704225 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4717 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
55 |
38.7% |
0.387323944 |
| 167 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 200 |
|
2 |
1.4% |
0.014084507 |
| 250 |
|
3 |
2.1% |
0.021126761 |
| 400 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 450 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 500 |
|
14 |
9.9% |
0.098591549 |
| 1500 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
r6pad4a1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 750 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=1, and R6PAD4A_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are
presented with a sum of 750 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1250]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
69 |
48.6% |
0.485915493 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4717 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
30 |
21.1% |
0.211267606 |
| 100 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 200 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 250 |
|
23 |
16.2% |
0.161971831 |
| 300 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 350 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 375 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 417 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 500 |
|
5 |
3.5% |
0.035211268 |
| 600 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 700 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 750 |
|
6 |
4.2% |
0.042253521 |
| 1250 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
r6pad4a1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 1 000 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=1, and R6PAD4A_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are
presented with a sum of 1 000 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1000]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
58 |
40.8% |
0.408450704 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4717 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
32 |
22.5% |
0.225352113 |
| 50 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 200 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 250 |
|
2 |
1.4% |
0.014084507 |
| 300 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 400 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 500 |
|
33 |
23.2% |
0.232394366 |
| 667 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 700 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 750 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 900 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
| 1000 |
|
9 |
6.3% |
0.063380282 |
r6pad4b
|
Variable label:
|
Drawn out to win cash prize. Decision 1: If drawn out, how much do you
want to give to a random person?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you and two other
participants can be drawn out to win an extra cash prize of 1,000
kroner. If you are drawn out, you must all make two decisions. As
decision 1, you must choose how much of the 1,000 kroner you would give
a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel.
As decision 2, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the one of
the other two persons who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Decision 1: If you were drawn out, how much of the 1,000 kroner would
you give to a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 kr |
61 |
21.1% |
0.21107266 |
| 2 |
250 kr |
44 |
15.2% |
0.15224913 |
| 3 |
500 kr |
124 |
42.9% |
0.42906574 |
| 4 |
750 kr |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01730104 |
| 5 |
1000 kr |
15 |
5.2% |
0.05190311 |
| 97 |
No answer |
40 |
13.8% |
0.13840830 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4570 |
|
NA |
r6pad4b_beslutning2
|
Variable label:
|
Drawn out to win cash prize. Wish/doesn’t wish to go to decision 2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=2. Asked on the same page as R6PAD4B]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I do not wish to go to Decision 2 |
78 |
27.0% |
0.2698962 |
| 2 |
Go on to Decision 2 |
160 |
55.4% |
0.5536332 |
| 97 |
No answer |
51 |
17.6% |
0.1764706 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4570 |
|
NA |
r6pad4b1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 0 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=2, and R6PAD4B_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are
presented with a sum of 0 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-2000]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
63 |
39.4% |
0.39375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4699 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
41 |
25.6% |
0.25625 |
| 10 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 200 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 250 |
|
13 |
8.1% |
0.08125 |
| 500 |
|
27 |
16.9% |
0.16875 |
| 750 |
|
4 |
2.5% |
0.02500 |
| 1000 |
|
9 |
5.6% |
0.05625 |
| 2000 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
r6pad4b1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 250 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=2, and R6PAD4B_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are
presented with a sum of 250 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1000]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
83 |
51.9% |
0.51875 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4699 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
31 |
19.4% |
0.19375 |
| 50 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 100 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 125 |
|
3 |
1.9% |
0.01875 |
| 150 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 200 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 250 |
|
24 |
15.0% |
0.15000 |
| 259 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 500 |
|
5 |
3.1% |
0.03125 |
| 750 |
|
7 |
4.4% |
0.04375 |
| 1000 |
|
2 |
1.3% |
0.01250 |
r6pad4b1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 500 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=2, and R6PAD4B_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are
presented with a sum of 500 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1000]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
81 |
50.6% |
0.50625 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4699 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
47 |
29.4% |
0.29375 |
| 100 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 200 |
|
2 |
1.3% |
0.01250 |
| 250 |
|
5 |
3.1% |
0.03125 |
| 300 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 350 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 500 |
|
20 |
12.5% |
0.12500 |
| 900 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 1000 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
r6pad4b1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 750 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=2, and R6PAD4B_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are
presented with a sum of 750 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-250-1200]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
88 |
55.0% |
0.55000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4699 |
|
NA |
| -250 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 0 |
|
46 |
28.8% |
0.28750 |
| 200 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 250 |
|
11 |
6.9% |
0.06875 |
| 300 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 350 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 375 |
|
2 |
1.3% |
0.01250 |
| 500 |
|
4 |
2.5% |
0.02500 |
| 600 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 750 |
|
2 |
1.3% |
0.01250 |
| 1000 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 1200 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
r6pad4b1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 1 000 kr, reduce
the prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=2, and R6PAD4B_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are
presented with a sum of 1 000 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-500-1800]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
87 |
54.4% |
0.54375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4699 |
|
NA |
| -500 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 0 |
|
53 |
33.1% |
0.33125 |
| 200 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 250 |
|
2 |
1.3% |
0.01250 |
| 450 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 500 |
|
8 |
5.0% |
0.05000 |
| 800 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 950 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 1000 |
|
4 |
2.5% |
0.02500 |
| 1800 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
r6pad4c
|
Variable label:
|
Drawn out to win cash prize. Decision 1: If drawn out, how much do you
want to give to a random person?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you and two other
participants can be drawn out to win an extra cash prize of 1,000
kroner. If you are drawn out, you must all make two decisions.
As decision 1, you must choose how much of the 1,000 kroner you would
give a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel. As
decision 2, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the one of the
other two persons who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Decision 1: If you were drawn out, how much of the 1,000 kroner would
you give to a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 kr |
75 |
27.8% |
0.27777778 |
| 2 |
250 kr |
35 |
13.0% |
0.12962963 |
| 3 |
500 kr |
123 |
45.6% |
0.45555556 |
| 4 |
750 kr |
4 |
1.5% |
0.01481481 |
| 5 |
1000 kr |
20 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
4.8% |
0.04814815 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4589 |
|
NA |
r6pad4c1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 0 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=3. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of
0 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1000]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
131 |
48.5% |
0.485185185 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4589 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
124 |
45.9% |
0.459259259 |
| 100 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 250 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 500 |
|
8 |
3.0% |
0.029629630 |
| 1000 |
|
5 |
1.9% |
0.018518519 |
r6pad4c1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 250 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=3. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of
250 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-750]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
146 |
54.1% |
0.540740741 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4589 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
86 |
31.9% |
0.318518519 |
| 50 |
|
3 |
1.1% |
0.011111111 |
| 100 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 125 |
|
4 |
1.5% |
0.014814815 |
| 150 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 200 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
| 250 |
|
15 |
5.6% |
0.055555556 |
| 259 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 350 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 500 |
|
6 |
2.2% |
0.022222222 |
| 750 |
|
4 |
1.5% |
0.014814815 |
r6pad4c1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 500 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=3. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of
500 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-500500]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
136 |
50.4% |
0.503703704 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4589 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
84 |
31.1% |
0.311111111 |
| 100 |
|
3 |
1.1% |
0.011111111 |
| 150 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 200 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
| 250 |
|
15 |
5.6% |
0.055555556 |
| 300 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 400 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 500 |
|
26 |
9.6% |
0.096296296 |
| 500500 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
r6pad4c1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 750 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=3. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of
750 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1000]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
148 |
54.8% |
0.548148148 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4589 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
49 |
18.1% |
0.181481481 |
| 50 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 90 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 100 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
| 150 |
|
3 |
1.1% |
0.011111111 |
| 200 |
|
3 |
1.1% |
0.011111111 |
| 250 |
|
35 |
13.0% |
0.129629630 |
| 300 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 350 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
| 375 |
|
5 |
1.9% |
0.018518519 |
| 400 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 500 |
|
9 |
3.3% |
0.033333333 |
| 600 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 750 |
|
8 |
3.0% |
0.029629630 |
| 1000 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
r6pad4c1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 1 000 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=3. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of
1 000 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1000]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
129 |
47.8% |
0.477777778 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4589 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
60 |
22.2% |
0.222222222 |
| 100 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 200 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 250 |
|
8 |
3.0% |
0.029629630 |
| 300 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 350 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 400 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
| 500 |
|
44 |
16.3% |
0.162962963 |
| 700 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 750 |
|
5 |
1.9% |
0.018518519 |
| 900 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 999 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
| 1000 |
|
15 |
5.6% |
0.055555556 |
r6pad4d
|
Variable label:
|
Drawn out to win cash prize. Decision 1: If drawn out, how much do you
want to give to a random person?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you and two other
participants can be drawn out to win an extra cash prize of 1,000
kroner. If you are drawn out, you must all make two decisions. As
decision 1, you must choose how much of the 1,000 kroner you would give
a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel. As decision
2, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the one of the other two
persons who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Decision 1: If you were drawn out, how much of the 1,000 kroner would
you give to a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 kr |
75 |
25.3% |
0.25337838 |
| 2 |
250 kr |
52 |
17.6% |
0.17567568 |
| 3 |
500 kr |
131 |
44.3% |
0.44256757 |
| 4 |
750 kr |
3 |
1.0% |
0.01013514 |
| 5 |
1000 kr |
25 |
8.4% |
0.08445946 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
3.4% |
0.03378378 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
r6pad4d1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 0 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=4. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of
0 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1000]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
111 |
37.5% |
0.375000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
93 |
31.4% |
0.314189189 |
| 1 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 100 |
|
4 |
1.4% |
0.013513514 |
| 200 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 250 |
|
13 |
4.4% |
0.043918919 |
| 420 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 500 |
|
40 |
13.5% |
0.135135135 |
| 550 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 750 |
|
6 |
2.0% |
0.020270270 |
| 800 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 1000 |
|
24 |
8.1% |
0.081081081 |
r6pad4d1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 250 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=4. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of
250 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-750250]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
146 |
49.3% |
0.493243243 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
64 |
21.6% |
0.216216216 |
| 1 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 100 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 125 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 200 |
|
4 |
1.4% |
0.013513514 |
| 250 |
|
51 |
17.2% |
0.172297297 |
| 300 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 350 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 420 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 500 |
|
7 |
2.4% |
0.023648649 |
| 750 |
|
15 |
5.1% |
0.050675676 |
| 750250 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
r6pad4d1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 500 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=4. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of
500 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-500]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
153 |
51.7% |
0.516891892 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
90 |
30.4% |
0.304054054 |
| 50 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 150 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 200 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 250 |
|
11 |
3.7% |
0.037162162 |
| 400 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 420 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 500 |
|
37 |
12.5% |
0.125000000 |
r6pad4d1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 750 kr, reduce the
prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=4. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of
750 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-750]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
166 |
56.1% |
0.560810811 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
90 |
30.4% |
0.304054054 |
| 25 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 125 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 200 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 250 |
|
19 |
6.4% |
0.064189189 |
| 375 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 420 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 500 |
|
4 |
1.4% |
0.013513514 |
| 600 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 750 |
|
10 |
3.4% |
0.033783784 |
r6pad4d1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 1 000 kr, reduce
the prize with:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize
of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=4. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of
1 000 kr]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1000]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
159 |
53.7% |
0.537162162 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
110 |
37.2% |
0.371621622 |
| 200 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 250 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 300 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 420 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 500 |
|
5 |
1.7% |
0.016891892 |
| 750 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 800 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
| 1000 |
|
15 |
5.1% |
0.050675676 |
r6ran10
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1145] [Invalid:3714]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
544 |
47.5% |
0.4751092 |
| 2 |
2 |
601 |
52.5% |
0.5248908 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3714 |
|
NA |
r6pad5a1
|
Variable label:
|
Take a decision
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Vi vil nå be deg om å svare på et spørsmål som handler om å ta en
beslutning. Vi trekker ut 4 personer som blir betalt ut fra beslutningen
de tar. Du er helt anonym og skal kun ta én beslutning.
Du kan velge å gå til venstre eller høyre. Du blir tilfeldig plassert
med en annen person som skal ta det samme valget. Hvor mye du tjener
avhenger av valgene dere tar:
Hvis begge går til venstre , får dere 800 kroner hver. Hvis du går
til venstre og den andre går til høyre, får du 0 kroner og den andre får
1200 kroner Hvis du går til høyre og den andre går til venstre, får du
1200 kroner og den andre får 0 kroner Hvis begge går til høyre, får dere
400 kroner hver.
Uansett hva den andre personen velger, tjener du mest ved å gå til
høyre. Den samlede betalingen er høyest hvis begge går til venstre.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please take a decision.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran10=1. Note: Respondents are asked to read a text on
the previous page which contextualises the decision they are asked to
make. The text is different from the one presented before R6PAD5B1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I choose to go to the left |
330 |
60.7% |
0.60661765 |
| 2 |
I choose to go to the right |
188 |
34.6% |
0.34558824 |
| 97 |
No answer |
26 |
4.8% |
0.04779412 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4315 |
|
NA |
r6pad5b1
|
Variable label:
|
Before the next question, take a decision
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Vi vil nå be deg om å svare på et spørsmål som handler om å ta en
beslutning. Vi trekker ut 4 personer som blir betalt ut fra beslutningen
de tar. Du er helt anonym og skal kun ta én beslutning.
Du kan velge å gå til venstre eller høyre. Du blir tilfeldig plassert
med en annen person som skal ta det samme valget. Hvor mye du tjener
avhenger av valgene dere tar:
Hvis begge går til venstre, får dere 800 kroner hver. Hvis du går til
venstre og den andre går til høyre, får du 0 kroner og den andre får
1200 kroner Hvis du går til høyre og den andre går til venstre, får du
1200 kroner og den andre får 0 kroner Hvis begge går til høyre, får dere
400 kroner hver
Uansett hva den andre personen velger, tjener du mest ved å gå til
høyre. Den samlede betalingen er høyest hvis begge går til venstre.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Before you go on to the next question, please take a decision.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran10=2. Note: Respondents are asked to read a text on
the previous page which contextualises the decision they are asked to
make. The text is different from the one presented before R6PAD5A1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I choose to go to the left |
341 |
56.7% |
0.56738769 |
| 2 |
I choose to go to the right |
220 |
36.6% |
0.36605657 |
| 97 |
No answer |
40 |
6.7% |
0.06655574 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4258 |
|
NA |
r6pad6_background1
|
Variable label:
|
R6PAD6 background variable: age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. List of values that are randomly selected into the
question. All randomizations are independent of each other. See R6PAD8
in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2317] [Invalid:2542]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
22-year-old |
328 |
14.2% |
0.1415624 |
| 2 |
30-year-old |
337 |
14.5% |
0.1454467 |
| 3 |
40-year-old |
314 |
13.6% |
0.1355201 |
| 4 |
50-year-old |
334 |
14.4% |
0.1441519 |
| 5 |
60-year-old |
328 |
14.2% |
0.1415624 |
| 6 |
70-year-old |
345 |
14.9% |
0.1488994 |
| 7 |
80-year-old |
331 |
14.3% |
0.1428571 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2542 |
|
NA |
r6pad6_background2
|
Variable label:
|
R6PAD6 background variable: gender
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. List of values that are randomly selected into the
question. All randomizations are independent of each other. See R6PAD8
in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2317] [Invalid:2542]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
woman |
1175 |
50.7% |
0.5071213 |
| 2 |
man |
1142 |
49.3% |
0.4928787 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2542 |
|
NA |
r6pad6_background3
|
Variable label:
|
R6PAD6 background variable: region
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. List of values that are randomly selected into the
question. All randomizations are independent of each other. See R6PAD8
in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2317] [Invalid:2542]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nord-Norge |
368 |
15.9% |
0.1588261 |
| 2 |
Midt-Norge |
388 |
16.7% |
0.1674579 |
| 3 |
Vestlandet |
414 |
17.9% |
0.1786793 |
| 4 |
Sørlandet |
378 |
16.3% |
0.1631420 |
| 5 |
Østlandet |
378 |
16.3% |
0.1631420 |
| 6 |
Oslo-området |
391 |
16.9% |
0.1687527 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2542 |
|
NA |
r6pad6_background4
|
Variable label:
|
R6PAD6 background variable: education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. List of values that are randomly selected into the
question. All randomizations are independent of each other. See R6PAD8
in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2317] [Invalid:2542]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
primary education |
810 |
35.0% |
0.3495900 |
| 2 |
secondary school education |
785 |
33.9% |
0.3388002 |
| 3 |
university education |
722 |
31.2% |
0.3116098 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2542 |
|
NA |
r6pad6_background5
|
Variable label:
|
R6PAD6 background variable: wage
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. List of values that are randomly selected into the
question. All randomizations are independent of each other. See R6PAD8
in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2317] [Invalid:2542]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
75 000 |
298 |
12.9% |
0.1286146 |
| 2 |
225 000 |
282 |
12.2% |
0.1217091 |
| 3 |
350 000 |
285 |
12.3% |
0.1230039 |
| 4 |
450 000 |
298 |
12.9% |
0.1286146 |
| 5 |
550 000 |
317 |
13.7% |
0.1368148 |
| 6 |
650 000 |
262 |
11.3% |
0.1130773 |
| 7 |
850 000 |
292 |
12.6% |
0.1260250 |
| 8 |
above 1 000 000 |
283 |
12.2% |
0.1221407 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2542 |
|
NA |
r6pad6_background6
|
Variable label:
|
R6PAD6 background variable: choice
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. List of values that are randomly selected into the
question. All randomizations are independent of each other. See R6PAD8
in appendix]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2317] [Invalid:2542]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
give away 0 of the 2000 kroners |
239 |
10.3% |
0.10315063 |
| 2 |
give away 500 of the 2000 kroners |
215 |
9.3% |
0.09279240 |
| 3 |
give away 1000 of the 2000 kroners |
226 |
9.8% |
0.09753992 |
| 4 |
give away 1500 of the 2000 kroners |
212 |
9.1% |
0.09149763 |
| 5 |
give away 2000 of the 2000 kroners |
235 |
10.1% |
0.10142426 |
| 6 |
keep 0 of the 2000 kroners him/herself |
217 |
9.4% |
0.09365559 |
| 7 |
keep 500 of the 2000 kroners him/herself |
236 |
10.2% |
0.10185585 |
| 8 |
keep 1000 of the 2000 kroners him/herself |
247 |
10.7% |
0.10660337 |
| 9 |
keep 1500 of the 2000 kroners him/herself |
236 |
10.2% |
0.10185585 |
| 10 |
keep 2000 of the 2000 kroners him/herself |
254 |
11.0% |
0.10962451 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2542 |
|
NA |
r6pad6
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent is this choice acceptable?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, in the last round
you were included in a draw for an extra monetary prize. 2 people were
drawn out: person A and person B. Person A received 2,000 kroner and had
to choose how much to share with person B.
Who was actually drawn out is secret, but imagine that the person who
received the money was a [age] [gender] from [region], with [education]
and an annual income of [wage] kroner. The person chose to [choice].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think that this choice is acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 OR u=3 and Note: the question wording is dependent on
values given in the R6PAD6_background variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
640 |
27.2% |
0.27187766 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
655 |
27.8% |
0.27824979 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
467 |
19.8% |
0.19838573 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
290 |
12.3% |
0.12319456 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
195 |
8.3% |
0.08283772 |
| 97 |
No answer |
107 |
4.5% |
0.04545455 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2505 |
|
NA |
r6pad7
|
Variable label:
|
Reasoning for your answer about how acceptable this choice was [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you give a reason for your answer about how acceptable this choice
was?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 or u=3]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6dv26
|
Variable label:
|
How should the government tighten up on various social security schemes?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a situation in which the government is forced to tighten up on
various social security schemes such as sickness benefit and
unemployment benefit.
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are three main ways of tightening up and we ask you to put a cross
against the alternative that you think the government should choose:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Raise the requirements for receiving benefit (this means having to work longer
before being able to receive benefit and will mean that some who could have
previously received benefit will not receive any benefit at all). |
432 |
34.4% |
0.34394904 |
| 2 |
Decrease the duration of benefit (this means not being able to receive benefit
for as long as previously). |
325 |
25.9% |
0.25875796 |
| 3 |
Decrease the level of benefit (this means that everyone receiving benefit get a
bit less than they would have done previously). |
456 |
36.3% |
0.36305732 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
3.4% |
0.03423567 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv5
|
Variable label:
|
How great an advantage/disadvantage that immigrants come here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
25 |
2.0% |
0.019904459 |
| 2 |
|
152 |
12.1% |
0.121019108 |
| 3 |
|
466 |
37.1% |
0.371019108 |
| 4 |
|
164 |
13.1% |
0.130573248 |
| 5 |
|
279 |
22.2% |
0.222133758 |
| 6 |
|
103 |
8.2% |
0.082006369 |
| 7 |
|
59 |
4.7% |
0.046974522 |
| 97 |
|
8 |
0.6% |
0.006369427 |
| 98 |
|
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv6
|
Variable label:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
200 |
15.9% |
0.159235669 |
| 2 |
Important |
550 |
43.8% |
0.437898089 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
413 |
32.9% |
0.328821656 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
81 |
6.4% |
0.064490446 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007165605 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002388535 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv7
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
225 |
17.9% |
0.17914013 |
| 2 |
The Progress Party |
329 |
26.2% |
0.26194268 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party |
193 |
15.4% |
0.15366242 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
88 |
7.0% |
0.07006369 |
| 5 |
The Centre Party |
22 |
1.8% |
0.01751592 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democrats |
75 |
6.0% |
0.05971338 |
| 7 |
The Liberal Party |
68 |
5.4% |
0.05414013 |
| 8 |
The Red Party |
24 |
1.9% |
0.01910828 |
| 9 |
The Green Party |
15 |
1.2% |
0.01194268 |
| 10 |
Other |
6 |
0.5% |
0.00477707 |
| 11 |
None |
179 |
14.3% |
0.14251592 |
| 97 |
No answer |
32 |
2.5% |
0.02547771 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv7_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy, other [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6dv29_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Begging should be prohibited
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
218 |
17.4% |
0.173566879 |
| 2 |
Agree |
229 |
18.2% |
0.182324841 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
225 |
17.9% |
0.179140127 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
164 |
13.1% |
0.130573248 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
147 |
11.7% |
0.117038217 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
187 |
14.9% |
0.148885350 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
81 |
6.4% |
0.064490446 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003980892 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv29_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in
the world than to people in this country
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world
than to people in this country
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
114 |
9.1% |
0.090764331 |
| 2 |
Agree |
203 |
16.2% |
0.161624204 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
206 |
16.4% |
0.164012739 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
402 |
32.0% |
0.320063694 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
125 |
10.0% |
0.099522293 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
147 |
11.7% |
0.117038217 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
3.9% |
0.039012739 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
0.8% |
0.007961783 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv29_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norway will lose its identity if more Muslims are allowed to
live here
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims are allowed to
live here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
144 |
11.5% |
0.114649682 |
| 2 |
Agree |
151 |
12.0% |
0.120222930 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
230 |
18.3% |
0.183121019 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
173 |
13.8% |
0.137738854 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
148 |
11.8% |
0.117834395 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
272 |
21.7% |
0.216560510 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
129 |
10.3% |
0.102707006 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007165605 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6ran19
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1254] [Invalid:3605]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
266 |
21.2% |
0.2121212 |
| 2 |
2 |
318 |
25.4% |
0.2535885 |
| 3 |
3 |
337 |
26.9% |
0.2687400 |
| 4 |
4 |
333 |
26.6% |
0.2655502 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3605 |
|
NA |
r6dv60a
|
Variable label:
|
Party’s reaction, politician expresses hate: Formal apology
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an elected politician in Norway expresses hate against
immigrants on his Facebook page. The political party he belongs to
reacts to this by demanding a formal apology.
The politician protests against the reaction and believes it is too
severe.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the party’s reaction?
|
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much too severe |
5 |
1.9% |
0.018796992 |
| 2 |
Too severe |
9 |
3.4% |
0.033834586 |
| 3 |
Slightly too severe |
17 |
6.4% |
0.063909774 |
| 4 |
Just right |
131 |
49.2% |
0.492481203 |
| 5 |
Slightly too mild |
26 |
9.8% |
0.097744361 |
| 6 |
Too mild |
44 |
16.5% |
0.165413534 |
| 7 |
Much too mild |
32 |
12.0% |
0.120300752 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.8% |
0.007518797 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4593 |
|
NA |
r6dv60b
|
Variable label:
|
Party’s reaction, politician expresses hate: A fine of 1 000 kr
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an elected politician in Norway expresses hate against
immigrants on his Facebook page. The political party he belongs to
reacts to this by imposing a small fine of 1,000 kroner.
The politician protests against the reaction and believes it is too
severe.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the party’s reaction?
|
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much too severe |
10 |
3.1% |
0.03144654 |
| 2 |
Too severe |
15 |
4.7% |
0.04716981 |
| 3 |
Slightly too severe |
9 |
2.8% |
0.02830189 |
| 4 |
Just right |
57 |
17.9% |
0.17924528 |
| 5 |
Slightly too mild |
28 |
8.8% |
0.08805031 |
| 6 |
Too mild |
74 |
23.3% |
0.23270440 |
| 7 |
Much too mild |
115 |
36.2% |
0.36163522 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
3.1% |
0.03144654 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4541 |
|
NA |
r6dv60c
|
Variable label:
|
Party’s reaction, politician expresses hate: A fine of 100 000 kr
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an elected politician in Norway expresses hate against
immigrants on his Facebook page. The political party he belongs to
reacts to this by imposing a large fine of 100,000 kroner.
The politician protests against the reaction and believes it is too
severe.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the party’s reaction?
|
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much too severe |
29 |
8.6% |
0.08605341 |
| 2 |
Too severe |
54 |
16.0% |
0.16023739 |
| 3 |
Slightly too severe |
64 |
19.0% |
0.18991098 |
| 4 |
Just right |
125 |
37.1% |
0.37091988 |
| 5 |
Slightly too mild |
9 |
2.7% |
0.02670623 |
| 6 |
Too mild |
25 |
7.4% |
0.07418398 |
| 7 |
Much too mild |
19 |
5.6% |
0.05637982 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
3.6% |
0.03560831 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4522 |
|
NA |
r6dv60d
|
Variable label:
|
Party’s reaction, politician expresses hate: Exclusion from the party
for life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an elected politician in Norway expresses hate against
immigrants on his Facebook page. The political party he belongs to
reacts to this by excluding him from the party for life.
The politician protests against the reaction and believes it is too
severe.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the party’s reaction?
|
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much too severe |
15 |
4.5% |
0.045045045 |
| 2 |
Too severe |
36 |
10.8% |
0.108108108 |
| 3 |
Slightly too severe |
71 |
21.3% |
0.213213213 |
| 4 |
Just right |
189 |
56.8% |
0.567567568 |
| 5 |
Slightly too mild |
10 |
3.0% |
0.030030030 |
| 6 |
Too mild |
6 |
1.8% |
0.018018018 |
| 7 |
Much too mild |
5 |
1.5% |
0.015015015 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003003003 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4526 |
|
NA |
r6dv61_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling about the party’s reaction: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two different parties were involved in the example you just read about:
The politician who wrote the Facebook piece and his party who reacted to
it. We ask you to think about the persons in the party who decided what
the reaction should be. To what extent do you have the following
feelings about their decision?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
477 |
38.0% |
0.37977707 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
308 |
24.5% |
0.24522293 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
231 |
18.4% |
0.18391720 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
90 |
7.2% |
0.07165605 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
21 |
1.7% |
0.01671975 |
| 97 |
No answer |
129 |
10.3% |
0.10270701 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv61_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling about the party’s reaction: Frustration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two different parties were involved in the example you just read about:
The politician who wrote the Facebook piece and his party who reacted to
it. We ask you to think about the persons in the party who decided what
the reaction should be. To what extent do you have the following
feelings about their decision?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Frustration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
355 |
28.3% |
0.28264331 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
254 |
20.2% |
0.20222930 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
310 |
24.7% |
0.24681529 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
172 |
13.7% |
0.13694268 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
61 |
4.9% |
0.04856688 |
| 97 |
No answer |
104 |
8.3% |
0.08280255 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv61_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling about the party’s reaction: Enthusiasm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two different parties were involved in the example you just read about:
The politician who wrote the Facebook piece and his party who reacted to
it. We ask you to think about the persons in the party who decided what
the reaction should be. To what extent do you have the following
feelings about their decision?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Enthusiasm
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
436 |
34.7% |
0.34713376 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
301 |
24.0% |
0.23964968 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
287 |
22.9% |
0.22850318 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
78 |
6.2% |
0.06210191 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
18 |
1.4% |
0.01433121 |
| 97 |
No answer |
136 |
10.8% |
0.10828025 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6ran20
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1250] [Invalid:3609]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
254 |
20.3% |
0.2032 |
| 2 |
2 |
251 |
20.1% |
0.2008 |
| 3 |
3 |
240 |
19.2% |
0.1920 |
| 4 |
4 |
249 |
19.9% |
0.1992 |
| 5 |
5 |
256 |
20.5% |
0.2048 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3609 |
|
NA |
r6dv63a
|
Variable label:
|
Reasonable that No to the EU receives support
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to
various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group No to the EU has
applied for annual public support for its activities out of the national
pot.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it would be reasonable for this group to receive public
support?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No, it is unreasonable |
117 |
46.1% |
0.4606299 |
| 2 |
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year
in public support: |
124 |
48.8% |
0.4881890 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
5.1% |
0.0511811 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4605 |
|
NA |
r6dv63a_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Yes, reasonable that No to the EU recieves the following amount yearly:
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to
various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group No to the EU has
applied for annual public support for its activities out of the national
pot.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following
amount a year in public support:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6dv63b
|
Variable label:
|
Reasonable that HRS receives support
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to
various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group Human Rights Service
(HRS), fronted by Hege Storhaug, has applied for annual public support
for its activities out of the national pot.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it would be reasonable for this group to receive public
support?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No, it is unreasonable |
128 |
51.0% |
0.50996016 |
| 2 |
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year
in public support: |
104 |
41.4% |
0.41434263 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
7.6% |
0.07569721 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4608 |
|
NA |
r6dv63b_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Yes, reasonable that HRS recieves the following amount yearly: [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to
various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group Human Rights Service
(HRS), fronted by Hege Storhaug, has applied for annual public support
for its activities out of the national pot.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following
amount a year in public support:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6dv63c
|
Variable label:
|
Reasonable that SIAN receives support
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to
various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group SIAN (Stop the
Islamisation of Norway) has applied for annual public support for its
activities out of the national pot.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it would be reasonable for this group to receive public
support?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No, it is unreasonable |
168 |
70.0% |
0.700 |
| 2 |
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year
in public support: |
66 |
27.5% |
0.275 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.5% |
0.025 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4619 |
|
NA |
r6dv63c_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Yes, reasonable that SIAN recieves the following amount yearly: [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to
various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group SIAN (Stop the
Islamisation of Norway) has applied for annual public support for its
activities out of the national pot.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following
amount a year in public support:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=3]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6dv63d
|
Variable label:
|
Reasonable that PEGIDA Norway receives support
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to
various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group PEGIDA Norway
(Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of Europe) has applied for
annual public support for its activities out of the national pot.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it would be reasonable for this group to receive public
support?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No, it is unreasonable |
192 |
77.1% |
0.77108434 |
| 2 |
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year
in public support: |
45 |
18.1% |
0.18072289 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
4.8% |
0.04819277 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4610 |
|
NA |
r6dv63d_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Yes, reasonable that PEGIDA Norway recieves the following amount yearly:
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to
various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group PEGIDA Norway
(Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of Europe) has applied for
annual public support for its activities out of the national pot.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following
amount a year in public support:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6dv63e
|
Variable label:
|
Reasonable that The Norwegian Resistance Movement receives support
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to
various voluntary groups. Imagine that the neo-Nazi group The Norwegian
Resistance Movement has applied for annual public support for its
activities out of the national pot.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it would be reasonable for this group to receive public
support?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No, it is unreasonable |
245 |
95.7% |
0.95703125 |
| 2 |
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year
in public support: |
8 |
3.1% |
0.03125000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.2% |
0.01171875 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4603 |
|
NA |
r6dv63e_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Yes, reasonable that The Norwegian Resistance Movement recieves the
following amount yearly: [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to
various voluntary groups. Imagine that the neo-Nazi group The Norwegian
Resistance Movement has applied for annual public support for its
activities out of the national pot.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following
amount a year in public support:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=5]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6lb1b
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you read/hear the words ‘asylum seeker’? [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you read or hear the words asylum seeker?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6dv64
|
Variable label:
|
Does it worry you that last year, more asylum seekers came than
anticipated?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Last year, more asylum seekers came to Norway than anticipated.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is this something that worries you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, to a very great extent |
198 |
15.8% |
0.15764331 |
| 2 |
Yes, to a great extent |
270 |
21.5% |
0.21496815 |
| 3 |
Yes, somewhat |
461 |
36.7% |
0.36703822 |
| 4 |
No, not much |
256 |
20.4% |
0.20382166 |
| 5 |
No, not at all |
49 |
3.9% |
0.03901274 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.8% |
0.01751592 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv65
|
Variable label:
|
Norwegian authorities’ handling of the asylum situation
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you feel that the Norwegian authorities have handled the asylum
situation so far?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
25 |
2.0% |
0.01990446 |
| 2 |
Well |
177 |
14.1% |
0.14092357 |
| 3 |
Quite well |
279 |
22.2% |
0.22213376 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
187 |
14.9% |
0.14888535 |
| 5 |
Quite badly |
300 |
23.9% |
0.23885350 |
| 6 |
Badly |
197 |
15.7% |
0.15684713 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
68 |
5.4% |
0.05414013 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.8% |
0.01831210 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv66
|
Variable label:
|
Do you have an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many new asylum seekers’ centres have been established in Norway in the
last year.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
611 |
48.6% |
0.48646497 |
| 2 |
Yes, my neighbourhood has got a new asylum seekers’ centre in the last year |
261 |
20.8% |
0.20780255 |
| 3 |
Yes, my neighbourhood has had an asylum seekers’ centre for more than a year |
209 |
16.6% |
0.16640127 |
| 4 |
Don't know |
154 |
12.3% |
0.12261146 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.7% |
0.01671975 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv67aja
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion about having an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion about having an asylum seekers’ centre close to
where you live?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66 = 2 or 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It is OK |
278 |
59.1% |
0.591489362 |
| 2 |
It is not OK |
89 |
18.9% |
0.189361702 |
| 3 |
It doesn't matter |
100 |
21.3% |
0.212765957 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.6% |
0.006382979 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv67anei
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion about getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion about getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to
where you live?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66 = 1 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It is OK |
328 |
42.9% |
0.42875817 |
| 2 |
It is not OK |
226 |
29.5% |
0.29542484 |
| 3 |
It doesn't matter |
202 |
26.4% |
0.26405229 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.2% |
0.01176471 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv67b
|
Variable label:
|
How strong are your views about this?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strong are your views about this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong |
130 |
10.4% |
0.10350318 |
| 2 |
Strong |
338 |
26.9% |
0.26910828 |
| 3 |
Fairly strong |
402 |
32.0% |
0.32006369 |
| 4 |
Not very strong |
258 |
20.5% |
0.20541401 |
| 5 |
Not strong at all |
97 |
7.7% |
0.07722930 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
2.5% |
0.02468153 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_1
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Followed matters
on TV, radio etc.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Followed matters concerning the asylum seekers’ centre on TV, radio,
newspapers etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
85 |
18.1% |
0.18085106 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
231 |
49.1% |
0.49148936 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
85 |
18.1% |
0.18085106 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
23 |
4.9% |
0.04893617 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
19 |
4.0% |
0.04042553 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
21 |
4.5% |
0.04468085 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.3% |
0.01276596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_2
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Followed
discussions in social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Followed discussions about the asylum seekers’ centre in social media,
such as Facebook
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
26 |
5.5% |
0.05531915 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
118 |
25.1% |
0.25106383 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
80 |
17.0% |
0.17021277 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
72 |
15.3% |
0.15319149 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
80 |
17.0% |
0.17021277 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
89 |
18.9% |
0.18936170 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_3
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Attended
information meetings
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Attended information meetings about the asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
8 |
1.7% |
0.01702128 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
21 |
4.5% |
0.04468085 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
39 |
8.3% |
0.08297872 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
64 |
13.6% |
0.13617021 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
176 |
37.4% |
0.37446809 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
157 |
33.4% |
0.33404255 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_4
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Full name,
written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre in social
media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre using my
full name in social media or similar
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
6 |
1.3% |
0.01276596 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
23 |
4.9% |
0.04893617 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
31 |
6.6% |
0.06595745 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
38 |
8.1% |
0.08085106 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
180 |
38.3% |
0.38297872 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
185 |
39.4% |
0.39361702 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01489362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_5
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Full name,
written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre in social
media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre using my
full name in social media or similar
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01489362 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
20 |
4.3% |
0.04255319 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
22 |
4.7% |
0.04680851 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
239 |
50.9% |
0.50851064 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
177 |
37.7% |
0.37659574 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_6
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Anonymously,
written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre in comments
area
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre in the
comments area or similar, without giving my name
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
1 |
0.2% |
0.00212766 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
17 |
3.6% |
0.03617021 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
18 |
3.8% |
0.03829787 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
244 |
51.9% |
0.51914894 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
183 |
38.9% |
0.38936170 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01489362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_7
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Anonymously,
written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre in comments
area
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre in the
comments area or similar, without giving my name
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
2 |
0.4% |
0.004255319 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
7 |
1.5% |
0.014893617 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
27 |
5.7% |
0.057446809 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
30 |
6.4% |
0.063829787 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
211 |
44.9% |
0.448936170 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
187 |
39.8% |
0.397872340 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.3% |
0.012765957 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_8
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Participated in
protests to stop it being set up
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in protests to stop the asylum seekers’ centre being set up
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
1 |
0.2% |
0.00212766 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
9 |
1.9% |
0.01914894 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
11 |
2.3% |
0.02340426 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
19 |
4.0% |
0.04042553 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
268 |
57.0% |
0.57021277 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
155 |
33.0% |
0.32978723 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01489362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_9
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Taken the
initiative to protest to stop it being set up
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taken the initiative to protest to stop the asylum seekers’ centre being
set up
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
6 |
1.3% |
0.01276596 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
15 |
3.2% |
0.03191489 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
22 |
4.7% |
0.04680851 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
272 |
57.9% |
0.57872340 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
150 |
31.9% |
0.31914894 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_10
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Participated in
voluntary work to help the asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in voluntary work to help the asylum seekers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
12 |
2.6% |
0.02553191 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
41 |
8.7% |
0.08723404 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
54 |
11.5% |
0.11489362 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
50 |
10.6% |
0.10638298 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
170 |
36.2% |
0.36170213 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
132 |
28.1% |
0.28085106 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.3% |
0.02340426 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_11
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Taken the
initiative in activities for the asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taken the initiative in activities for the asylum seekers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
8 |
1.7% |
0.01702128 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
23 |
4.9% |
0.04893617 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
63 |
13.4% |
0.13404255 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
53 |
11.3% |
0.11276596 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
181 |
38.5% |
0.38510638 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
132 |
28.1% |
0.28085106 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.1% |
0.02127660 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_12
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Said hello to
some of the asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Said hello to some of the asylum seekers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
41 |
8.7% |
0.08723404 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
119 |
25.3% |
0.25319149 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
64 |
13.6% |
0.13617021 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
30 |
6.4% |
0.06382979 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
114 |
24.3% |
0.24255319 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
96 |
20.4% |
0.20425532 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.3% |
0.01276596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_13
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Become friends
with some of the asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Become friends with some of the asylum seekers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
12 |
2.6% |
0.02553191 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
25 |
5.3% |
0.05319149 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
89 |
18.9% |
0.18936170 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
43 |
9.1% |
0.09148936 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
175 |
37.2% |
0.37234043 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
118 |
25.1% |
0.25106383 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.7% |
0.01702128 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_14
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Given gifts to
the asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Given gifts to the asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
22 |
4.7% |
0.04680851 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
72 |
15.3% |
0.15319149 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
50 |
10.6% |
0.10638298 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
33 |
7.0% |
0.07021277 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
168 |
35.7% |
0.35744681 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
117 |
24.9% |
0.24893617 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.7% |
0.01702128 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_15
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Avoided the
centre and the asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Avoided the centre and the asylum seekers as far as possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
14 |
3.0% |
0.02978723 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
20 |
4.3% |
0.04255319 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
71 |
15.1% |
0.15106383 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
37 |
7.9% |
0.07872340 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
212 |
45.1% |
0.45106383 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
108 |
23.0% |
0.22978723 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.7% |
0.01702128 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_16
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Tolerated the
establishment
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tolerated the establishment of the asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
89 |
18.9% |
0.18936170 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
181 |
38.5% |
0.38510638 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
96 |
20.4% |
0.20425532 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
12 |
2.6% |
0.02553191 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
24 |
5.1% |
0.05106383 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
61 |
13.0% |
0.12978723 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01489362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_17
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
2 |
0.4% |
0.004255319 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
5 |
1.1% |
0.010638298 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
23 |
4.9% |
0.048936170 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002127660 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
6 |
1.3% |
0.012765957 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
53 |
11.3% |
0.112765957 |
| 97 |
No answer |
380 |
80.9% |
0.808510638 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_17_other
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Other [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to
getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your
personal reactions.
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6dv68nei_1
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Followed matters
on TV, radio etc.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Followed matters concerning the asylum seekers’ centre on TV, radio,
newspapers etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
141 |
18.4% |
0.18431373 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
393 |
51.4% |
0.51372549 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
139 |
18.2% |
0.18169935 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
36 |
4.7% |
0.04705882 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
18 |
2.4% |
0.02352941 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
24 |
3.1% |
0.03137255 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.8% |
0.01830065 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_2
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Followed
discussions in social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Followed discussions about the asylum seekers’ centre in social media,
such as Facebook
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
58 |
7.6% |
0.07581699 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
203 |
26.5% |
0.26535948 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
134 |
17.5% |
0.17516340 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
141 |
18.4% |
0.18431373 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
104 |
13.6% |
0.13594771 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
108 |
14.1% |
0.14117647 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_3
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Attended
information meetings
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Attended information meetings about the asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
83 |
10.8% |
0.10849673 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
242 |
31.6% |
0.31633987 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
178 |
23.3% |
0.23267974 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
103 |
13.5% |
0.13464052 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
89 |
11.6% |
0.11633987 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
51 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.5% |
0.02483660 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_4
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Full name,
written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre in social
media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre using my
full name in social media or similar
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
20 |
2.6% |
0.02614379 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
79 |
10.3% |
0.10326797 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
178 |
23.3% |
0.23267974 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
136 |
17.8% |
0.17777778 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
191 |
25.0% |
0.24967320 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
144 |
18.8% |
0.18823529 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_5
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Full name,
written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre in social
media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre using my
full name in social media or similar
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
4 |
0.5% |
0.005228758 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
15 |
2.0% |
0.019607843 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
71 |
9.3% |
0.092810458 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
123 |
16.1% |
0.160784314 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
371 |
48.5% |
0.484967320 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
164 |
21.4% |
0.214379085 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.2% |
0.022222222 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_6
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Anonymously,
written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre in comments
area
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre in the
comments area or similar, without giving my name
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
5 |
0.7% |
0.006535948 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
8 |
1.0% |
0.010457516 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
52 |
6.8% |
0.067973856 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
98 |
12.8% |
0.128104575 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
418 |
54.6% |
0.546405229 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
164 |
21.4% |
0.214379085 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.6% |
0.026143791 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_7
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Anonymously,
written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre in comments
area
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre in the
comments area or similar, without giving my name
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
6 |
0.8% |
0.007843137 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
31 |
4.1% |
0.040522876 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
153 |
20.0% |
0.200000000 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
120 |
15.7% |
0.156862745 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
277 |
36.2% |
0.362091503 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
160 |
20.9% |
0.209150327 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.4% |
0.023529412 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_8
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Participated in
protests to stop it being set up
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in protests to stop the asylum seekers’ centre being set up
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
17 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
33 |
4.3% |
0.04313725 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
66 |
8.6% |
0.08627451 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
127 |
16.6% |
0.16601307 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
404 |
52.8% |
0.52810458 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
100 |
13.1% |
0.13071895 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.4% |
0.02352941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_9
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Taken the
initiative to protest to stop it being set up
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taken the initiative to protest to stop the asylum seekers’ centre being
set up
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
6 |
0.8% |
0.007843137 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
13 |
1.7% |
0.016993464 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
63 |
8.2% |
0.082352941 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
105 |
13.7% |
0.137254902 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
454 |
59.3% |
0.593464052 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
105 |
13.7% |
0.137254902 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.5% |
0.024836601 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_10
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Participated in
voluntary work to help the asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in voluntary work to help the asylum seekers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
27 |
3.5% |
0.03529412 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
199 |
26.0% |
0.26013072 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
283 |
37.0% |
0.36993464 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
82 |
10.7% |
0.10718954 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
110 |
14.4% |
0.14379085 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
45 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.5% |
0.02483660 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_11
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Taken the
initiative in activities for the asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taken the initiative in activities for the asylum seekers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
17 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
106 |
13.9% |
0.13856209 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
336 |
43.9% |
0.43921569 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
112 |
14.6% |
0.14640523 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
123 |
16.1% |
0.16078431 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
49 |
6.4% |
0.06405229 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
2.9% |
0.02875817 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_12
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Said hello to
some of the asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Said hello to some of the asylum seekers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
94 |
12.3% |
0.12287582 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
345 |
45.1% |
0.45098039 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
205 |
26.8% |
0.26797386 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
27 |
3.5% |
0.03529412 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
47 |
6.1% |
0.06143791 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
28 |
3.7% |
0.03660131 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.5% |
0.02483660 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_13
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Become friends
with some of the asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Become friends with some of the asylum seekers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
28 |
3.7% |
0.03660131 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
191 |
25.0% |
0.24967320 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
343 |
44.8% |
0.44836601 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
75 |
9.8% |
0.09803922 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
61 |
8.0% |
0.07973856 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
44 |
5.8% |
0.05751634 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
3.0% |
0.03006536 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_14
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Given gifts to
the asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Given gifts to the asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
50 |
6.5% |
0.06535948 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
265 |
34.6% |
0.34640523 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
221 |
28.9% |
0.28888889 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
70 |
9.2% |
0.09150327 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
89 |
11.6% |
0.11633987 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
50 |
6.5% |
0.06535948 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.6% |
0.02614379 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_15
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Avoided the
centre and the asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Avoided the centre and the asylum seekers as far as possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
26 |
3.4% |
0.03398693 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
63 |
8.2% |
0.08235294 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
170 |
22.2% |
0.22222222 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
154 |
20.1% |
0.20130719 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
270 |
35.3% |
0.35294118 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
62 |
8.1% |
0.08104575 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.6% |
0.02614379 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_16
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Tolerated the
establishment
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tolerated the establishment of the asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
118 |
15.4% |
0.15424837 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
341 |
44.6% |
0.44575163 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
178 |
23.3% |
0.23267974 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
40 |
5.2% |
0.05228758 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
41 |
5.4% |
0.05359477 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
22 |
2.9% |
0.02875817 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
3.3% |
0.03267974 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_17
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002614379 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
9 |
1.2% |
0.011764706 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
42 |
5.5% |
0.054901961 |
| 4 |
A bad fit |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003921569 |
| 5 |
A very bad fit |
6 |
0.8% |
0.007843137 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
68 |
8.9% |
0.088888889 |
| 97 |
No answer |
635 |
83.0% |
0.830065359 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_17_other
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Other [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre
in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum
seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would
react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit
your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6dv69
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts about getting asylum seekers in your neighbourhood [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you would like to share some completely anonymous thoughts about
getting asylum seekers in your neighbourhood, you are welcome to do so
here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6ran21
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1238] [Invalid:3621]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
640 |
51.7% |
0.5169628 |
| 2 |
2 |
598 |
48.3% |
0.4830372 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3621 |
|
NA |
r6dv12aa_1
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are asylum seekers: Competent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how asylum seekers are regarded by people in Norway
generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are asylum
seekers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
34 |
5.3% |
0.0531250 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
221 |
34.5% |
0.3453125 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
312 |
48.8% |
0.4875000 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
52 |
8.1% |
0.0812500 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
5 |
0.8% |
0.0078125 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.5% |
0.0250000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12aa_2
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are asylum seekers: Warm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how asylum seekers are regarded by people in Norway
generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are asylum
seekers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
23 |
3.6% |
0.0359375 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
156 |
24.4% |
0.2437500 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
351 |
54.8% |
0.5484375 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
81 |
12.7% |
0.1265625 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
7 |
1.1% |
0.0109375 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
3.4% |
0.0343750 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ab_1
|
Variable label:
|
Personal view, to what extent are asylum seekers: Competent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you personally see asylum seekers. As you see it, to
what extent are asylum seekers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
17 |
2.8% |
0.02842809 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
73 |
12.2% |
0.12207358 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
298 |
49.8% |
0.49832776 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
170 |
28.4% |
0.28428094 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
16 |
2.7% |
0.02675585 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
4.0% |
0.04013378 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ab_2
|
Variable label:
|
Personal view, to what extent are asylum seekers: Warm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you personally see asylum seekers. As you see it, to
what extent are asylum seekers:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
18 |
3.0% |
0.03010033 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
51 |
8.5% |
0.08528428 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
287 |
48.0% |
0.47993311 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
194 |
32.4% |
0.32441472 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
23 |
3.8% |
0.03846154 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
4.2% |
0.04180602 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_1
|
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers:
Contempt
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Contempt
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
43 |
6.7% |
0.0671875 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
175 |
27.3% |
0.2734375 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
318 |
49.7% |
0.4968750 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
67 |
10.5% |
0.1046875 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
9 |
1.4% |
0.0140625 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
4.4% |
0.0437500 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_2
|
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers:
Disgust
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Disgust
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
57 |
8.9% |
0.0890625 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
216 |
33.8% |
0.3375000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
284 |
44.4% |
0.4437500 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
47 |
7.3% |
0.0734375 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
6 |
0.9% |
0.0093750 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
4.7% |
0.0468750 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_3
|
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers:
Admiration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
94 |
14.7% |
0.1468750 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
321 |
50.2% |
0.5015625 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
179 |
28.0% |
0.2796875 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
8 |
1.3% |
0.0125000 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
3 |
0.5% |
0.0046875 |
| 97 |
No answer |
35 |
5.5% |
0.0546875 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_4
|
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers:
Pride
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Pride
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
120 |
18.8% |
0.1875000 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
327 |
51.1% |
0.5109375 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
137 |
21.4% |
0.2140625 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
14 |
2.2% |
0.0218750 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
3 |
0.5% |
0.0046875 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
6.1% |
0.0609375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_5
|
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers:
Feel sorry for
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
8 |
1.3% |
0.0125000 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
50 |
7.8% |
0.0781250 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
309 |
48.3% |
0.4828125 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
225 |
35.2% |
0.3515625 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
19 |
3.0% |
0.0296875 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
4.5% |
0.0453125 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_6
|
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers:
Sympathy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sympathy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
8 |
1.3% |
0.0125000 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
51 |
8.0% |
0.0796875 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
356 |
55.6% |
0.5562500 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
185 |
28.9% |
0.2890625 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
11 |
1.7% |
0.0171875 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
4.5% |
0.0453125 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_7
|
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers:
Envy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
281 |
43.9% |
0.4390625 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
205 |
32.0% |
0.3203125 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
98 |
15.3% |
0.1531250 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
25 |
3.9% |
0.0390625 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
4.8% |
0.0484375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_8
|
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers:
Jealousy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Jealousy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
246 |
38.4% |
0.3843750 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
229 |
35.8% |
0.3578125 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
110 |
17.2% |
0.1718750 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
22 |
3.4% |
0.0343750 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
2 |
0.3% |
0.0031250 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
4.8% |
0.0484375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_9
|
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers:
Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
59 |
9.2% |
0.0921875 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
178 |
27.8% |
0.2781250 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
272 |
42.5% |
0.4250000 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
91 |
14.2% |
0.1421875 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
7 |
1.1% |
0.0109375 |
| 97 |
No answer |
33 |
5.2% |
0.0515625 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_10
|
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers:
Fear
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
21 |
3.3% |
0.0328125 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
65 |
10.2% |
0.1015625 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
298 |
46.6% |
0.4656250 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
182 |
28.4% |
0.2843750 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
46 |
7.2% |
0.0718750 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
4.4% |
0.0437500 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_11
|
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers:
Worry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Worry
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
17 |
2.7% |
0.0265625 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
66 |
10.3% |
0.1031250 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
298 |
46.6% |
0.4656250 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
185 |
28.9% |
0.2890625 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
47 |
7.3% |
0.0734375 |
| 97 |
No answer |
27 |
4.2% |
0.0421875 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_1
|
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers:
Contempt
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Contempt
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
382 |
63.9% |
0.638795987 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
136 |
22.7% |
0.227424749 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
43 |
7.2% |
0.071906355 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
13 |
2.2% |
0.021739130 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
5 |
0.8% |
0.008361204 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
3.2% |
0.031772575 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_2
|
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers:
Disgust
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Disgust
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
417 |
69.7% |
0.697324415 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
120 |
20.1% |
0.200668896 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
27 |
4.5% |
0.045150502 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
13 |
2.2% |
0.021739130 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
3 |
0.5% |
0.005016722 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
3.0% |
0.030100334 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_3
|
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers:
Admiration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
101 |
16.9% |
0.16889632 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
151 |
25.3% |
0.25250836 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
249 |
41.6% |
0.41638796 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
67 |
11.2% |
0.11204013 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
8 |
1.3% |
0.01337793 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
3.7% |
0.03678930 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_4
|
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Pride
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Pride
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
163 |
27.3% |
0.272575251 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
218 |
36.5% |
0.364548495 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
145 |
24.2% |
0.242474916 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
32 |
5.4% |
0.053511706 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006688963 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
6.0% |
0.060200669 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_5
|
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Feel
sorry for
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
27 |
4.5% |
0.04515050 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
58 |
9.7% |
0.09698997 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
257 |
43.0% |
0.42976589 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
190 |
31.8% |
0.31772575 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
53 |
8.9% |
0.08862876 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_6
|
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers:
Sympathy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sympathy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
24 |
4.0% |
0.04013378 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
37 |
6.2% |
0.06187291 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
238 |
39.8% |
0.39799331 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
225 |
37.6% |
0.37625418 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
60 |
10.0% |
0.10033445 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
2.3% |
0.02341137 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_7
|
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Envy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
511 |
85.5% |
0.854515050 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
58 |
9.7% |
0.096989967 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
8 |
1.3% |
0.013377926 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
3 |
0.5% |
0.005016722 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
3.0% |
0.030100334 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_8
|
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers:
Jealousy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Jealousy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
532 |
89.0% |
0.889632107 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
46 |
7.7% |
0.076923077 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
3 |
0.5% |
0.005016722 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001672241 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.7% |
0.026755853 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_9
|
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
454 |
75.9% |
0.759197324 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
99 |
16.6% |
0.165551839 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
19 |
3.2% |
0.031772575 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
5 |
0.8% |
0.008361204 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006688963 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.8% |
0.028428094 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_10
|
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Fear
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
267 |
44.6% |
0.44648829 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
176 |
29.4% |
0.29431438 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
107 |
17.9% |
0.17892977 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
20 |
3.3% |
0.03344482 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
10 |
1.7% |
0.01672241 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
3.0% |
0.03010033 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_11
|
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Worry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Worry
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
221 |
37.0% |
0.36956522 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
196 |
32.8% |
0.32775920 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
121 |
20.2% |
0.20234114 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
30 |
5.0% |
0.05016722 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
11 |
1.8% |
0.01839465 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
3.2% |
0.03177258 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6ran22
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1235] [Invalid:3624]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
314 |
25.4% |
0.2542510 |
| 2 |
2 |
310 |
25.1% |
0.2510121 |
| 3 |
3 |
303 |
24.5% |
0.2453441 |
| 4 |
4 |
308 |
24.9% |
0.2493927 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3624 |
|
NA |
r6dv13a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are refugees: Competent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how refugees are regarded by people in Norway generally. As
people generally see it, to what extent are refugees:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
21 |
6.7% |
0.066878981 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
133 |
42.4% |
0.423566879 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
128 |
40.8% |
0.407643312 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
16 |
5.1% |
0.050955414 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003184713 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
4.8% |
0.047770701 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4545 |
|
NA |
r6dv13a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are refugees: Warm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how refugees are regarded by people in Norway generally. As
people generally see it, to what extent are refugees:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
14 |
4.5% |
0.044585987 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
96 |
30.6% |
0.305732484 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
164 |
52.2% |
0.522292994 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
21 |
6.7% |
0.066878981 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003184713 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
5.7% |
0.057324841 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4545 |
|
NA |
r6dv13b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are Roma people: Competent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how Roma people are regarded by people in Norway generally.
As people generally see it, to what extent are Roma people:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
86 |
27.7% |
0.27741935 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
148 |
47.7% |
0.47741935 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
54 |
17.4% |
0.17419355 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
12 |
3.9% |
0.03870968 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4549 |
|
NA |
r6dv13b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are Roma people: Warm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how Roma people are regarded by people in Norway generally.
As people generally see it, to what extent are Roma people:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
48 |
15.5% |
0.15483871 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
144 |
46.5% |
0.46451613 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
90 |
29.0% |
0.29032258 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
18 |
5.8% |
0.05806452 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4549 |
|
NA |
r6dv13c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are Muslims: Competent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how Muslims are regarded by people in Norway generally. As
people generally see it, to what extent are Muslims:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
13 |
4.3% |
0.04290429 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
78 |
25.7% |
0.25742574 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
163 |
53.8% |
0.53795380 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
36 |
11.9% |
0.11881188 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
3 |
1.0% |
0.00990099 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
3.3% |
0.03300330 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4556 |
|
NA |
r6dv13c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are Muslims: Warm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how Muslims are regarded by people in Norway generally. As
people generally see it, to what extent are Muslims:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
13 |
4.3% |
0.04290429 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
94 |
31.0% |
0.31023102 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
155 |
51.2% |
0.51155116 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
28 |
9.2% |
0.09240924 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.00330033 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
4.0% |
0.03960396 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4556 |
|
NA |
r6dv13d_1
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are the followers of the
Prohpet’s Ummah: Competent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how followers of the Muslim fundamentalist group the
Prophet’s Ummah are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people
generally see it, to what extent are followers of the Muslim
fundamentalist group the Prophet’s Ummah:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
130 |
42.2% |
0.422077922 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
87 |
28.2% |
0.282467532 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
51 |
16.6% |
0.165584416 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
17 |
5.5% |
0.055194805 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003246753 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
7.1% |
0.071428571 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4551 |
|
NA |
r6dv13d_2
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are the followers of the
Prohpet’s Ummah: Warm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how followers of the Muslim fundamentalist group the
Prophet’s Ummah are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people
generally see it, to what extent are followers of the Muslim
fundamentalist group the Prophet’s Ummah:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
180 |
58.4% |
0.58441558 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
82 |
26.6% |
0.26623377 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
21 |
6.8% |
0.06818182 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
3 |
1.0% |
0.00974026 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4551 |
|
NA |
r6ran23
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1230] [Invalid:3629]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
303 |
24.6% |
0.2463415 |
| 2 |
2 |
320 |
26.0% |
0.2601626 |
| 3 |
3 |
307 |
25.0% |
0.2495935 |
| 4 |
4 |
300 |
24.4% |
0.2439024 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3629 |
|
NA |
r6dv14a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of The Liberal Party:
Competent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the of the Liberal political party are
regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to
what extent are members of the of the Liberal political party:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
9 |
3.0% |
0.02970297 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
57 |
18.8% |
0.18811881 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
148 |
48.8% |
0.48844884 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
66 |
21.8% |
0.21782178 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01320132 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
6.3% |
0.06270627 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4556 |
|
NA |
r6dv14a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of The Liberal Party:
Warm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the of the Liberal political party are
regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to
what extent are members of the of the Liberal political party:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
7 |
2.3% |
0.02310231 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
40 |
13.2% |
0.13201320 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
150 |
49.5% |
0.49504950 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
83 |
27.4% |
0.27392739 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
3 |
1.0% |
0.00990099 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
6.6% |
0.06600660 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4556 |
|
NA |
r6dv14b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of The Progress
Party: Competent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the Progress Party are regarded by people in
Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are members
of the Progress Party:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
20 |
6.2% |
0.062500 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
84 |
26.2% |
0.262500 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
142 |
44.4% |
0.443750 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
59 |
18.4% |
0.184375 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006250 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
4.1% |
0.040625 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4539 |
|
NA |
r6dv14b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of The Progress
Party: Warm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the Progress Party are regarded by people in
Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are members
of the Progress Party:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
30 |
9.4% |
0.093750 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
108 |
33.8% |
0.337500 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
138 |
43.1% |
0.431250 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
28 |
8.8% |
0.087500 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003125 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
4.7% |
0.046875 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4539 |
|
NA |
r6dv14c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of HRS: Competent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the of the Human Rights Service, fronted by
Hege Storhaug, are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people
generally see it, to what extent are members of the Human Rights
Service, fronted by Hege Storhaug:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
22 |
7.2% |
0.07166124 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
67 |
21.8% |
0.21824104 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
123 |
40.1% |
0.40065147 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
46 |
15.0% |
0.14983713 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
9 |
2.9% |
0.02931596 |
| 97 |
No answer |
40 |
13.0% |
0.13029316 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4552 |
|
NA |
r6dv14c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of HRS: Warm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the of the Human Rights Service, fronted by
Hege Storhaug, are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people
generally see it, to what extent are members of the Human Rights
Service, fronted by Hege Storhaug:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
34 |
11.1% |
0.11074919 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
90 |
29.3% |
0.29315961 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
97 |
31.6% |
0.31596091 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
37 |
12.1% |
0.12052117 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
5 |
1.6% |
0.01628664 |
| 97 |
No answer |
44 |
14.3% |
0.14332248 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4552 |
|
NA |
r6dv14d_1
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of The Norwegian
Resistance Movement: Competent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the of the neo-Nazi group The Norwegian
Resistance Movement are regarded by people in Norway generally. As
people generally see it, to what extent are members of the of the
neo-Nazi group The Norwegian Resistance Movement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
133 |
44.3% |
0.443333333 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
111 |
37.0% |
0.370000000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
31 |
10.3% |
0.103333333 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
8 |
2.7% |
0.026666667 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
5.3% |
0.053333333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4559 |
|
NA |
r6dv14d_2
|
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of The Norwegian
Resistance Movement: Warm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the of the neo-Nazi group The Norwegian
Resistance Movement are regarded by people in Norway generally. As
people generally see it, to what extent are members of the of the
neo-Nazi group The Norwegian Resistance Movement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
166 |
55.3% |
0.553333333 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
92 |
30.7% |
0.306666667 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
25 |
8.3% |
0.083333333 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003333333 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
5.0% |
0.050000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4559 |
|
NA |
r6ran24
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1228] [Invalid:3631]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
325 |
26.5% |
0.2646580 |
| 2 |
2 |
299 |
24.3% |
0.2434853 |
| 3 |
3 |
313 |
25.5% |
0.2548860 |
| 4 |
4 |
291 |
23.7% |
0.2369707 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3631 |
|
NA |
r6dv70a
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction other political parties, politician found guilty of expressing
hate against colleague: Formal apology
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a politician in Norway has been found guilty in a local
court of having written a Tweet that expressed hate against a colleague
with an immigrant background. The leaders of the other political parties
demand a formal apology from the politician and his party.
The politician and his party protest against the reaction.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the reaction of the leaders of the other
political parties?
|
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran24=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much too severe |
9 |
2.8% |
0.02769231 |
| 2 |
Too severe |
13 |
4.0% |
0.04000000 |
| 3 |
Slightly too severe |
25 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
| 4 |
Just right |
193 |
59.4% |
0.59384615 |
| 5 |
Slightly too mild |
29 |
8.9% |
0.08923077 |
| 6 |
Too mild |
31 |
9.5% |
0.09538462 |
| 7 |
Much too mild |
14 |
4.3% |
0.04307692 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
3.4% |
0.03384615 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4534 |
|
NA |
r6dv70b
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction other political parties, politician found guilty of expressing
hate against colleague: Exclusion from party for life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a politician in Norway has been found guilty in a local
court of having written a Tweet that expressed hate against a colleague
with an immigrant background. The leaders of the other political parties
demand that the party excludes him for life.
The politician and his party protest against the reaction.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the reaction of the leaders of the other
political parties?
|
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran24=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much too severe |
17 |
5.7% |
0.05685619 |
| 2 |
Too severe |
50 |
16.7% |
0.16722408 |
| 3 |
Slightly too severe |
60 |
20.1% |
0.20066890 |
| 4 |
Just right |
152 |
50.8% |
0.50836120 |
| 5 |
Slightly too mild |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01672241 |
| 6 |
Too mild |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01672241 |
| 7 |
Much too mild |
3 |
1.0% |
0.01003344 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.3% |
0.02341137 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4560 |
|
NA |
r6dv70c
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction other political parties, politician expressing hate against
colleague: Formal apology
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a politician in Norway has written a Tweet that
expressed hate against a colleague with an immigrant background. The
leaders of the other political parties demand a formal apology from the
politician and his party.
The politician and his party protest against the reaction.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the reaction of the leaders of the other
political parties?
|
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran24=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much too severe |
6 |
1.9% |
0.01916933 |
| 2 |
Too severe |
22 |
7.0% |
0.07028754 |
| 3 |
Slightly too severe |
16 |
5.1% |
0.05111821 |
| 4 |
Just right |
186 |
59.4% |
0.59424920 |
| 5 |
Slightly too mild |
26 |
8.3% |
0.08306709 |
| 6 |
Too mild |
27 |
8.6% |
0.08626198 |
| 7 |
Much too mild |
24 |
7.7% |
0.07667732 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.9% |
0.01916933 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4546 |
|
NA |
r6dv70d
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction other political parties, politician expressing hate against
colleague: Exclusion from party for life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a politician in Norway has written a Tweet that
expressed hate against a colleague with an immigrant background. The
leaders of the other political parties demand that the party excludes
him for life.
The politician and his party protest against the reaction.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the reaction of the leaders of the other
political parties?
|
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran24=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much too severe |
21 |
7.2% |
0.07216495 |
| 2 |
Too severe |
52 |
17.9% |
0.17869416 |
| 3 |
Slightly too severe |
69 |
23.7% |
0.23711340 |
| 4 |
Just right |
124 |
42.6% |
0.42611684 |
| 5 |
Slightly too mild |
7 |
2.4% |
0.02405498 |
| 6 |
Too mild |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01718213 |
| 7 |
Much too mild |
7 |
2.4% |
0.02405498 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02061856 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4568 |
|
NA |
r6dv71_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings about demand: Enthusiasm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Three different parties were involved in the example you just read
about: The politician who had written the Tweet, his party and the
leaders of the other political parties who reacted to it. Please think
about the leaders of the political parties who put forward the demand
against the politician and his party. To what extent do you have the
following feelings about their demand?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Enthusiasm
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
293 |
23.3% |
0.23328025 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
294 |
23.4% |
0.23407643 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
337 |
26.8% |
0.26831210 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
170 |
13.5% |
0.13535032 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
37 |
2.9% |
0.02945860 |
| 97 |
No answer |
125 |
10.0% |
0.09952229 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv71_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings about demand: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Three different parties were involved in the example you just read
about: The politician who had written the Tweet, his party and the
leaders of the other political parties who reacted to it. Please think
about the leaders of the political parties who put forward the demand
against the politician and his party. To what extent do you have the
following feelings about their demand?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
478 |
38.1% |
0.38057325 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
299 |
23.8% |
0.23805732 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
225 |
17.9% |
0.17914013 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
98 |
7.8% |
0.07802548 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
26 |
2.1% |
0.02070064 |
| 97 |
No answer |
130 |
10.4% |
0.10350318 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv71_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings about demand: Frustraion
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Three different parties were involved in the example you just read
about: The politician who had written the Tweet, his party and the
leaders of the other political parties who reacted to it. Please think
about the leaders of the political parties who put forward the demand
against the politician and his party. To what extent do you have the
following feelings about their demand?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Frustration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
416 |
33.1% |
0.33121019 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
273 |
21.7% |
0.21735669 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
259 |
20.6% |
0.20621019 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
148 |
11.8% |
0.11783439 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
35 |
2.8% |
0.02786624 |
| 97 |
No answer |
125 |
10.0% |
0.09952229 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6ran25
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1224] [Invalid:3635]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
267 |
21.8% |
0.2181373 |
| 2 |
2 |
240 |
19.6% |
0.1960784 |
| 3 |
3 |
242 |
19.8% |
0.1977124 |
| 4 |
4 |
257 |
21.0% |
0.2099673 |
| 5 |
5 |
218 |
17.8% |
0.1781046 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3635 |
|
NA |
r6dv72a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Stricter rules needed for asylum in order to secure
women’s safety
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Stricter rules for asylum are needed in order to secure women’s safety
in Norwegian society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran25=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
41 |
15.4% |
0.153558052 |
| 2 |
Agree |
38 |
14.2% |
0.142322097 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
64 |
24.0% |
0.239700375 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
46 |
17.2% |
0.172284644 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
23 |
8.6% |
0.086142322 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
43 |
16.1% |
0.161048689 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
10 |
3.7% |
0.037453184 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.007490637 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4592 |
|
NA |
r6dv72b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, statement HRS: Stricter rules needed for asylum in order
to secure women’s safety
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Representatives of the Human Rights Service, fronted by Hege Storhaug,
have said that stricter rules for asylum are needed in order to secure
women’s safety in Norwegian society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran25=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
12.1% |
0.12083333 |
| 2 |
Agree |
34 |
14.2% |
0.14166667 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
61 |
25.4% |
0.25416667 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
39 |
16.2% |
0.16250000 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
13 |
5.4% |
0.05416667 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
35 |
14.6% |
0.14583333 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
25 |
10.4% |
0.10416667 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4619 |
|
NA |
r6dv72c
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, statement PEGIDA: Stricter rules needed for asylum in
order to secure women’s safety
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Representatives of the PEGIDA Norway (Patriotic Europeans against the
Islamisation of Europe), fronted by Max Hermansen, have said that
stricter rules for asylum are needed in order to secure women’s safety
in Norwegian society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran25=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
12.0% |
0.11983471 |
| 2 |
Agree |
22 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
50 |
20.7% |
0.20661157 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
28 |
11.6% |
0.11570248 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
16 |
6.6% |
0.06611570 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
49 |
20.2% |
0.20247934 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
40 |
16.5% |
0.16528926 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
3.3% |
0.03305785 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4617 |
|
NA |
r6dv72d
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, statement The Norwegian Resistance Movement: Stricter
rules needed for asylum in order to secure women’s safety
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Representatives of the neo-Nazi group The Norwegian Resistance Movement
have said that stricter rules for asylum are needed in order to secure
women’s safety in Norwegian society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran25=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
5.4% |
0.054474708 |
| 2 |
Agree |
16 |
6.2% |
0.062256809 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
49 |
19.1% |
0.190661479 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
33 |
12.8% |
0.128404669 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
13 |
5.1% |
0.050583658 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
65 |
25.3% |
0.252918288 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
66 |
25.7% |
0.256809339 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003891051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4602 |
|
NA |
r6dv72e
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, statement Progress Party : Stricter rules needed for
asylum in order to secure women’s safety
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Representatives of the Progress Party have said that stricter rules for
asylum are needed in order to secure women’s safety in Norwegian
society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran25=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
35 |
16.1% |
0.16055046 |
| 2 |
Agree |
34 |
15.6% |
0.15596330 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
36 |
16.5% |
0.16513761 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
23 |
10.6% |
0.10550459 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
23 |
10.6% |
0.10550459 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
37 |
17.0% |
0.16972477 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
27 |
12.4% |
0.12385321 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01376147 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4641 |
|
NA |
r6ran26
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1224] [Invalid:3635]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
292 |
23.9% |
0.2385621 |
| 2 |
2 |
323 |
26.4% |
0.2638889 |
| 3 |
3 |
309 |
25.2% |
0.2524510 |
| 4 |
4 |
300 |
24.5% |
0.2450980 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3635 |
|
NA |
r6dv25a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Immigrants are entitled to have their traditions
respected
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrants to Norway are entitled to have their traditions and cultures
respected.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran26=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
15 |
5.1% |
0.05136986 |
| 2 |
Agree |
84 |
28.8% |
0.28767123 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
88 |
30.1% |
0.30136986 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
21 |
7.2% |
0.07191781 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
44 |
15.1% |
0.15068493 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
26 |
8.9% |
0.08904110 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
2.7% |
0.02739726 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02054795 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6dv25b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Immigrants are entitled to have their traditions
protected
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrants to Norway are entitled to have their traditions and cultures
protected.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran26=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
6 |
1.9% |
0.01857585 |
| 2 |
Agree |
39 |
12.1% |
0.12074303 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
89 |
27.6% |
0.27554180 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
44 |
13.6% |
0.13622291 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
56 |
17.3% |
0.17337461 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
57 |
17.6% |
0.17647059 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
20 |
6.2% |
0.06191950 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
3.7% |
0.03715170 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4536 |
|
NA |
r6dv25c
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Muslims are entitled to have their traditions respected
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims in Norway are entitled to have their traditions and cultures
respected.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran26=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
20 |
6.5% |
0.06472492 |
| 2 |
Agree |
76 |
24.6% |
0.24595469 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
99 |
32.0% |
0.32038835 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
28 |
9.1% |
0.09061489 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
42 |
13.6% |
0.13592233 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
24 |
7.8% |
0.07766990 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
5.2% |
0.05177994 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01294498 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4550 |
|
NA |
r6dv25d
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Muslims are entitled to have their traditions protected
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims in Norway are entitled to have their traditions and cultures
protected.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran26=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
8 |
2.7% |
0.026666667 |
| 2 |
Agree |
34 |
11.3% |
0.113333333 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
76 |
25.3% |
0.253333333 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
51 |
17.0% |
0.170000000 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
66 |
22.0% |
0.220000000 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
36 |
12.0% |
0.120000000 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
27 |
9.0% |
0.090000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006666667 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4559 |
|
NA |
r6ran27
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1224] [Invalid:3635]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
322 |
26.3% |
0.2630719 |
| 2 |
2 |
268 |
21.9% |
0.2189542 |
| 3 |
3 |
304 |
24.8% |
0.2483660 |
| 4 |
4 |
330 |
27.0% |
0.2696078 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3635 |
|
NA |
r6dv52a
|
Variable label:
|
Should asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years
be granted residence, even if rejected appeals?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are
entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal.
Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for
several years while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be
granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think
that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran27=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
65 |
20.2% |
0.20186335 |
| 2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
132 |
41.0% |
0.40993789 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
122 |
37.9% |
0.37888199 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.9% |
0.00931677 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4537 |
|
NA |
r6dv52b
|
Variable label:
|
Should asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years
and participated in local communities be granted residence, even if
rejected appeals?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are
entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal.
Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for
several years and have participated actively in their local communities
while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted
residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they
should not be allowed to stay?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran27=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
101 |
37.7% |
0.37686567 |
| 2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
80 |
29.9% |
0.29850746 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
83 |
31.0% |
0.30970149 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.5% |
0.01492537 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4591 |
|
NA |
r6dv52c
|
Variable label:
|
Should Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several
years be granted residence, even if rejected appeals?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are
entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal.
Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway
for several years while they are waiting for a decision to be made
should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do
you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran27=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
48 |
15.8% |
0.15789474 |
| 2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
135 |
44.4% |
0.44407895 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
113 |
37.2% |
0.37171053 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4555 |
|
NA |
r6dv52d
|
Variable label:
|
Should Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several
years and participated in local communities be granted residence, even
if rejected appeals?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are
entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal.
Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway
for several years and have participated actively in their local
communities while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be
granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think
that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran27=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
97 |
29.4% |
0.293939394 |
| 2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
114 |
34.5% |
0.345454545 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
118 |
35.8% |
0.357575758 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003030303 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4529 |
|
NA |
r6dv53a
|
Variable label:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers not being granted
residence?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers not being granted
residence?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6DV52A-D=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong |
131 |
28.4% |
0.284164859 |
| 2 |
Fairly strong |
161 |
34.9% |
0.349240781 |
| 3 |
Not very strong |
99 |
21.5% |
0.214750542 |
| 4 |
Not strong at all |
69 |
15.0% |
0.149674620 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002169197 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4398 |
|
NA |
r6dv53b
|
Variable label:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers being granted residence?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers being granted residence?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6DV52A-D=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong |
77 |
24.8% |
0.247588424 |
| 2 |
Fairly strong |
132 |
42.4% |
0.424437299 |
| 3 |
Not very strong |
79 |
25.4% |
0.254019293 |
| 4 |
Not strong at all |
20 |
6.4% |
0.064308682 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.0% |
0.009646302 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4548 |
|
NA |
r6ran28
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1223] [Invalid:3636]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
339 |
27.7% |
0.2771872 |
| 2 |
2 |
274 |
22.4% |
0.2240392 |
| 3 |
3 |
301 |
24.6% |
0.2461161 |
| 4 |
4 |
309 |
25.3% |
0.2526574 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3636 |
|
NA |
r6dv54a
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence/lack of confidence: Muslims when they say they wish to be
part of Norwegian society
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence or lack of confidence do you have in Muslims when
they say that they wish to be part of Norwegian society?
|
|
Post-question:
|
I have:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran28=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Great confidence |
68 |
20.1% |
0.200589971 |
| 2 |
Some confidence |
117 |
34.5% |
0.345132743 |
| 3 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
72 |
21.2% |
0.212389381 |
| 4 |
Some lack of confidence |
55 |
16.2% |
0.162241888 |
| 5 |
Great lack of confidence |
24 |
7.1% |
0.070796460 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.9% |
0.008849558 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4520 |
|
NA |
r6dv54b
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence/lack of confidence: Muslim leaders when they say they wish to
be part of Norwegian society
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence or lack of confidence do you have in Muslim leaders
when they say that they wish to be part of Norwegian society?
|
|
Post-question:
|
I have:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran28=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Great confidence |
31 |
11.3% |
0.11313869 |
| 2 |
Some confidence |
78 |
28.5% |
0.28467153 |
| 3 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
57 |
20.8% |
0.20802920 |
| 4 |
Some lack of confidence |
70 |
25.5% |
0.25547445 |
| 5 |
Great lack of confidence |
36 |
13.1% |
0.13138686 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.00729927 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6dv54c
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence/lack of confidence: Muslim fundamentalists when they say that
they wish to be part of Norwegian society
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence or lack of confidence do you have in Muslim
fundamentalists when they say that they wish to be part of Norwegian
society?
|
|
Post-question:
|
I have:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran28=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Great confidence |
5 |
1.7% |
0.016611296 |
| 2 |
Some confidence |
16 |
5.3% |
0.053156146 |
| 3 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
34 |
11.3% |
0.112956811 |
| 4 |
Some lack of confidence |
117 |
38.9% |
0.388704319 |
| 5 |
Great lack of confidence |
126 |
41.9% |
0.418604651 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.0% |
0.009966777 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4558 |
|
NA |
r6dv54d
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence/lack of confidence: Moderate Muslims when they say that they
wish to be part of Norwegian society
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence or lack of confidence do you have in moderate
Muslims when they say that they wish to be part of Norwegian society?
|
|
Post-question:
|
I have:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran28=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Great confidence |
93 |
30.1% |
0.30097087 |
| 2 |
Some confidence |
106 |
34.3% |
0.34304207 |
| 3 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
57 |
18.4% |
0.18446602 |
| 4 |
Some lack of confidence |
35 |
11.3% |
0.11326861 |
| 5 |
Great lack of confidence |
12 |
3.9% |
0.03883495 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.9% |
0.01941748 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4550 |
|
NA |
r6ran29
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1223] [Invalid:3636]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
289 |
23.6% |
0.2363042 |
| 2 |
2 |
326 |
26.7% |
0.2665576 |
| 3 |
3 |
299 |
24.4% |
0.2444808 |
| 4 |
4 |
309 |
25.3% |
0.2526574 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3636 |
|
NA |
r6dv43a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Prophet’s Ummah rent local meeting room
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the Muslim fundamentalist group, Prophet’s Ummah, has asked
to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members
and sympathisers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Prophet’s Ummah should
be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran29=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01730104 |
| 2 |
Agree |
21 |
7.3% |
0.07266436 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
15 |
5.2% |
0.05190311 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
41 |
14.2% |
0.14186851 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
35 |
12.1% |
0.12110727 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
65 |
22.5% |
0.22491349 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
100 |
34.6% |
0.34602076 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.4% |
0.02422145 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4570 |
|
NA |
r6dv43b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: SIAN rent local meeting room
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the anti-Islamic group, Stop the Islamisation of Norway
(SIAN), has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a
meeting for its members and sympathisers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that SIAN should be allowed to
rent premises for this purpose?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran29=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
17 |
5.2% |
0.05214724 |
| 2 |
Agree |
51 |
15.6% |
0.15644172 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
57 |
17.5% |
0.17484663 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
80 |
24.5% |
0.24539877 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
41 |
12.6% |
0.12576687 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
42 |
12.9% |
0.12883436 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
33 |
10.1% |
0.10122699 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.5% |
0.01533742 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4533 |
|
NA |
r6dv43c
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Muslim congregation rent local meeting room
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a Muslim congregation has asked to hire a local meeting
room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that such a Muslim congregation
should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran29=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
50 |
16.7% |
0.16722408 |
| 2 |
Agree |
106 |
35.5% |
0.35451505 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
38 |
12.7% |
0.12709030 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
54 |
18.1% |
0.18060201 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
21 |
7.0% |
0.07023411 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
8 |
2.7% |
0.02675585 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
5.7% |
0.05685619 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01672241 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4560 |
|
NA |
r6dv43d
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Free Church congregation rent local meeting room
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a Free Church congregation has asked to hire a local
meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and
sympathisers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that such a Free Church
congregation should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran29=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
38 |
12.3% |
0.122977346 |
| 2 |
Agree |
106 |
34.3% |
0.343042071 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
52 |
16.8% |
0.168284790 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
85 |
27.5% |
0.275080906 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
9 |
2.9% |
0.029126214 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
11 |
3.6% |
0.035598706 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003236246 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.3% |
0.022653722 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4550 |
|
NA |
r6k33
|
Variable label:
|
What applies best to what you have been doing for the last 7 days
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark one alternative.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Paid work (or temporarily absent) |
2839 |
58.4% |
0.584276600 |
| 2 |
Studying (not paid for by an employer) |
240 |
4.9% |
0.049392879 |
| 3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
85 |
1.7% |
0.017493311 |
| 4 |
Unemployed. Want a job, but not actively seeking work |
33 |
0.7% |
0.006791521 |
| 5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
155 |
3.2% |
0.031899568 |
| 6 |
Retired |
1066 |
21.9% |
0.219386705 |
| 7 |
Civilian or military service |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001646429 |
| 8 |
At home, looking after children or others |
46 |
0.9% |
0.009466969 |
| 9 |
Other |
263 |
5.4% |
0.054126363 |
| 97 |
No answer |
124 |
2.6% |
0.025519654 |
r6k33_9_other
|
Variable label:
|
What applies best to what you have been doing for the last 7 days, other
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days. Other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6k34_1
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Public central administration
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Public central administration/authority |
300 |
10.6% |
0.105671 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2539 |
89.4% |
0.894329 |
r6k34_2
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Kindergarten/school/teaching
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Kindergarten/school/teaching |
385 |
13.6% |
0.1356111 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2454 |
86.4% |
0.8643889 |
r6k34_3
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Health services
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health services |
367 |
12.9% |
0.1292709 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2472 |
87.1% |
0.8707291 |
r6k34_4
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Social services/child protection
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social services/child protection |
65 |
2.3% |
0.02289539 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2774 |
97.7% |
0.97710461 |
r6k34_5
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Nursing and care services
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nursing and care services |
141 |
5.0% |
0.04966538 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2698 |
95.0% |
0.95033462 |
r6k34_6
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Defence/police/judicial system/security
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Defence/police/judicial system/security |
77 |
2.7% |
0.02712223 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2762 |
97.3% |
0.97287777 |
r6k34_7
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Agriculture/forestry/fishing
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agriculture/forestry/fishing |
69 |
2.4% |
0.02430433 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2770 |
97.6% |
0.97569567 |
r6k34_8
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Industry/technology
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Industry/technology |
225 |
7.9% |
0.07925326 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2614 |
92.1% |
0.92074674 |
r6k34_9
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Building/construction
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Building/construction |
222 |
7.8% |
0.07819655 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2617 |
92.2% |
0.92180345 |
r6k34_10
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Retailing/shop
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Retailing/shop |
147 |
5.2% |
0.0517788 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2692 |
94.8% |
0.9482212 |
r6k34_11
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Transport/communications
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Transport/communications |
141 |
5.0% |
0.04966538 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2698 |
95.0% |
0.95033462 |
r6k34_12
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Culture/sport/organisations
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Culture/sport/organisations |
101 |
3.6% |
0.03557591 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2738 |
96.4% |
0.96442409 |
r6k34_13
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Media/advertising
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Media/advertising/PR/information |
77 |
2.7% |
0.02712223 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2762 |
97.3% |
0.97287777 |
r6k34_14
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Research/analysis
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Research/analysis |
115 |
4.1% |
0.04050722 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2724 |
95.9% |
0.95949278 |
r6k34_15
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Travel/hotels
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Travel/hotels |
33 |
1.2% |
0.01162381 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2806 |
98.8% |
0.98837619 |
r6k34_16
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Restaurants/catering
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Restaurants/catering |
25 |
0.9% |
0.008805918 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2814 |
99.1% |
0.991194082 |
r6k34_17
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Telecommunications/IT
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Telecommunications/IT |
146 |
5.1% |
0.05142656 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2693 |
94.9% |
0.94857344 |
r6k34_18
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Banking/insurance/finance
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Banking/insurance/finance |
105 |
3.7% |
0.03698485 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2734 |
96.3% |
0.96301515 |
r6k34_19
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Commercial services
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Commercial services |
165 |
5.8% |
0.05811906 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2674 |
94.2% |
0.94188094 |
r6k34_20
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Oil/gas
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oil/gas |
160 |
5.6% |
0.05635787 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2679 |
94.4% |
0.94364213 |
r6k34_21
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Other
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other |
188 |
6.6% |
0.0662205 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2651 |
93.4% |
0.9337795 |
r6k34_21_other
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Other [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in? Other
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r6k35
|
Variable label:
|
Best description of the area you live in
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
1280 |
26.3% |
0.26342869 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
886 |
18.2% |
0.18234205 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
1279 |
26.3% |
0.26322289 |
| 4 |
A village |
757 |
15.6% |
0.15579337 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
526 |
10.8% |
0.10825273 |
| 97 |
No answer |
131 |
2.7% |
0.02696028 |
r6k26
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest level of completed education?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondents has not answered this question in previous
waves]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:2-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
1 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
| 3 |
Lower secondary school (grunnskole, 7-årig folkeskole, framhaldskole, realskole) |
6 |
10.0% |
0.10000000 |
| 4 |
County college certificate |
1 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
| 5 |
Upper secondary/end of formal schooling, humanities subjects, university
preparatory course, 1-year Post-leaving Certificate course (VK2, VG stage 3,
gymnas) (5) |
6 |
10.0% |
0.10000000 |
| 6 |
Upper secondary/end of formal schooling, vocational subjects/courses (VK2, VK3,
VG stage 3, vocational certificate, journeyman's certificate) |
7 |
11.7% |
0.11666667 |
| 7 |
Preliminary course for university/college without credits |
1 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
| 8 |
Certificate for additional further education (technical college) |
1 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
| 9 |
University/college, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (2 and 2½ year
associate degree) |
4 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
| 10 |
Completed 3-4 years of college education (Bachelor, BA, B.Sc., teacher's
training college, nursing college, nursery teacher, engineer, business
economist, etc.) |
8 |
13.3% |
0.13333333 |
| 11 |
Completed 3-4 years of university education (Bachelor, BA, B.Sc.) |
5 |
8.3% |
0.08333333 |
| 12 |
Completed 5-6 years of college education (Master’s, main subject) |
8 |
13.3% |
0.13333333 |
| 13 |
Completed 5-6 years of university education (Master’s, main subject), longer
professional education (Bachelor of Divinity, Bachelor of Psychology, Bachelor
of Medicine, Bachelor of Veterinary Medicine, Master of Science, architect,
business economist) |
2 |
3.3% |
0.03333333 |
| 14 |
Researcher (Ph.D) |
1 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
| 15 |
None of these |
2 |
3.3% |
0.03333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
11.7% |
0.11666667 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4799 |
|
NA |
r6P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
2456 |
50.5% |
0.5054538 |
| 2 |
Female |
2403 |
49.5% |
0.4945462 |
r6P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
1387 |
28.5% |
0.28544968 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
1181 |
24.3% |
0.24305413 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
231 |
4.8% |
0.04754065 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
1264 |
26.0% |
0.26013583 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
446 |
9.2% |
0.09178843 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
350 |
7.2% |
0.07203128 |
R6P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus |
602 |
12.4% |
0.123893805 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
785 |
16.2% |
0.161555876 |
| 3 |
Østfold |
260 |
5.4% |
0.053508952 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
244 |
5.0% |
0.050216094 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
145 |
3.0% |
0.029841531 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
142 |
2.9% |
0.029224120 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
256 |
5.3% |
0.052685738 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
134 |
2.8% |
0.027577691 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
145 |
3.0% |
0.029841531 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
86 |
1.8% |
0.017699115 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
417 |
8.6% |
0.085820128 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
556 |
11.4% |
0.114426837 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
73 |
1.5% |
0.015023667 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
218 |
4.5% |
0.044865199 |
| 15 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
348 |
7.2% |
0.071619675 |
| 16 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
98 |
2.0% |
0.020168759 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
186 |
3.8% |
0.038279481 |
| 18 |
Troms |
120 |
2.5% |
0.024696440 |
| 19 |
Finmark |
44 |
0.9% |
0.009055361 |
r6P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
430 |
8.8% |
0.08849558 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary eduction |
1439 |
29.6% |
0.29615147 |
| 3 |
University/university college |
2806 |
57.7% |
0.57748508 |
| 97 |
No answer |
184 |
3.8% |
0.03786787 |
r6P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
21 |
0.4% |
0.004321877 |
| 2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
31 |
0.6% |
0.006379914 |
| 3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
378 |
7.8% |
0.077793785 |
| 4 |
College certificate |
43 |
0.9% |
0.008849558 |
| 5 |
Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education
programme, one-year post admission |
615 |
12.7% |
0.126569253 |
| 6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
595 |
12.2% |
0.122453180 |
| 7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
63 |
1.3% |
0.012965631 |
| 8 |
Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical
college) |
166 |
3.4% |
0.034163408 |
| 9 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
465 |
9.6% |
0.095698703 |
| 10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
991 |
20.4% |
0.203951430 |
| 11 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
321 |
6.6% |
0.066062976 |
| 12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
363 |
7.5% |
0.074706730 |
| 13 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
570 |
11.7% |
0.117308088 |
| 14 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
96 |
2.0% |
0.019757152 |
| 15 |
None of these |
136 |
2.8% |
0.027989298 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.001029018 |
r6P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
190 |
3.9% |
0.03910270 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
865 |
17.8% |
0.17802017 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
1117 |
23.0% |
0.22988269 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
1000 |
20.6% |
0.20580366 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
794 |
16.3% |
0.16340811 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
590 |
12.1% |
0.12142416 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
303 |
6.2% |
0.06235851 |
r6P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
2172 |
44.7% |
0.44700556 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
2384 |
49.1% |
0.49063593 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
303 |
6.2% |
0.06235851 |
r6Weight_1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2 and P1. See documentation report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-3]
|
r6Weight_2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4_1 and P1. See documentation
report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-26]
|
r6Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-3]
|
