Citation
Scientific committee for KODEM
|
Name
|
Affiliaton
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
|
Rune Karlsen
|
UiO
|
|
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø
|
NORCE
|
|
Johannes Bergh
|
ISF
|
|
Jarle Trondal
|
UiA
|
Responsible for KODEM-panels
|
Panel
|
Name
|
|
NMP
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
|
NRP
|
Yvette Peters
|
|
NJP
|
Erik Knudsen
|
|
NFP
|
Jarle Trondal, Tobias Bach, Jacob Aars
|
Coordinating team
|
Name
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
|
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
|
|
Soran Hajo Dahl
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators (NFP) is an internet-based
survey of public administrators. The study deals with matters that are
important to society, public administration and democracy. The panel is
initiated and run by researchers from the leading reseach universities
and institutions in Norway and is a non-profit project that aims to
serve research goals. The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators seeks
to contribute in a dialogue between research, politics and socitey.
Some of the questions in this survey are part of a coordinated system of
surveys (“KODEM”) which also gathers information about beliefs and
convictions of citizens
(uib.no/medborger), elected
representatives
(uib.no/representant), and
from journalists and editors
(uib.no/NJP). This mode of data
collection enables innovative research of groups that together comprise
the political body in Norway.
The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators is part of the Digital
Social Science Core Facility (DIGSSCORE) at the University of Bergen
(UiB). The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators is also affiliated
with the Norwegian citizen Panel, the Norwegian Journalist Panel, and
the Panel of Elected Representatives. The University of Bergen is the
owner and treatment manager of the The Norwegian Panel of Public
Administrators. Ideas2Evidence executes the practical implementation of
the survey, and are responsible for recruting participants, as well as
sending and receiving surveys to and from respondents. The data is
stored encrypted and secure in UiB’s infrastructure for for safe
processing of sensitive personal data in research, ‘SAFE’. The panel has
been reported to and processed by the Data Protection Official for
Research at Sikt - Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and
Research. More information can be found at
uib.no/en/nfp.
Scope
Geographic coverage: National.
Unit of
analysis: Central government employees.
Universe: All employees of the central government.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
All employees of the central government - ministries, directorates and
supervisory authorities - are invited to participate in the Norwegian
Panel of Public Administrators. Contact information has been collected
through “Depkatalog” or the website of the individual directorate or
supervisory authority.
In this establishment round of the panel, only employees of the central
government have been recruited. The long term goal is to recruit public
administrators from all levels of public administration.
Due to some over-coverage during the recruitment process, there are N =
24 respondents who have been excluded after the field period, as they
did not belong to the defined target population, that is, not working in
public administration in the central government (ministries,
directorates, and supervisory authorities). We therefore recommend
excluding these respondents when conducting analyses. This can be done
using the variable f1_tvcpa. For more information on the exclusion
process and exclusion criteria, please consult the documentation report.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on an online questionnaire where the panel members
are invited by email.
For a more detailed description on recruitment of panel members, please
see the documentation report.
Wave 1 was fielded from 2nd of November 2020 to the 8th of April 2021.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2024-06-19
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 1
|
|
v-102
|
2024-06-07
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 1
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-05
|
f1_tvcpa
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj3_recode
|
Added
f1k1kj3_recode in order to separate education levels in each round from
P4_1 with accumulated values.
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_1_coded
|
New
variable: New version of f1k1kj103_1_coded that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_2_coded
|
New
variable: New version of f1k1kj103_2_coded that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_3_coded
|
New
variable: New version of f1k1kj103_3_coded that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_4_coded
|
New
variable: New version of f1k1kj103_4_coded that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_5_coded
|
New
variable: New version of f1k1kj103_5_coded that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj111_coded
|
New
variable: New version of f1k1kj111_coded that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj6_coded
|
New
variable: New version of f1k1kj6_coded that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj3_recode_coded
|
New
variable: New version of f1k1kj3_recode_coded that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj3_recode
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_1_coded
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_2_coded
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_3_coded
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_4_coded
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_5_coded
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj111_coded
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj6_coded
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj3_recode_coded
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_1_coded
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_2_coded
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_3_coded
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_4_coded
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj103_5_coded
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj111_coded
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj6_coded
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj3_recode_coded
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2021-08-20
|
f1k1kj3_recode
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2021-08-20
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 1
|
|
v-100
|
2021-06-07
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 1
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
The Panel of Public Administrators - round 1k1 - v-102-L.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Privileged
|
|
# Cases
|
2279
|
|
# Variables
|
175
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f1interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f1interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2104] [Invalid:175]
[Range:-]
|
f1browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f1browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f1mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Mobile |
147 |
6.5% |
0.06450197 |
| 0 |
Other |
2132 |
93.5% |
0.93549803 |
f1opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f1enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
2134 |
93.6% |
0.9363756 |
| 2 |
Touch |
145 |
6.4% |
0.0636244 |
| 3 |
Generic |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f1getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
f1group
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 |
1152 |
50.5% |
0.5054849 |
| 2 |
Group 2 |
1127 |
49.5% |
0.4945151 |
f1k1kj102_1
|
Variable label:
|
Main tasks in your work: Administrative tasks
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Administrative tasks (e.g. payroll and human resources management,
organisational development, management and performance reporting, ICT,
operations and maintenance)
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may choose more than one alternative.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1662 |
72.9% |
0.7292672 |
| 1 |
Selected |
617 |
27.1% |
0.2707328 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj102_2
|
Variable label:
|
Main tasks in your work: Budgeting
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Budgeting
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may choose more than one alternative.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
2065 |
90.6% |
0.90609917 |
| 1 |
Selected |
214 |
9.4% |
0.09390083 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
f1k1kj102_3
|
Variable label:
|
Main tasks in your work: Preparation/modification/implementation of laws
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Preparation/modification/implementation of laws and regulations etc.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may choose more than one alternative.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1879 |
82.4% |
0.8244844 |
| 1 |
Selected |
400 |
17.6% |
0.1755156 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj102_4
|
Variable label:
|
Main tasks in your work: Investigation, planning, analysis
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Investigation, planning, analysis
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may choose more than one alternative.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1184 |
52.0% |
0.5195261 |
| 1 |
Selected |
1095 |
48.0% |
0.4804739 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj102_5
|
Variable label:
|
Main tasks in your work: Leadership and/or organisational development
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Leadership and/or organisational development
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may choose more than one alternative.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1787 |
78.4% |
0.7841158 |
| 1 |
Selected |
492 |
21.6% |
0.2158842 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj102_6
|
Variable label:
|
Main tasks in your work: Coordination
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Coordination
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may choose more than one alternative.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1442 |
63.3% |
0.6327337 |
| 1 |
Selected |
837 |
36.7% |
0.3672663 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj102_7
|
Variable label:
|
Main tasks in your work: Case management/individual decisions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Case management/individual decisions (cases concerning specific persons,
companies, institutions, etc.)
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may choose more than one alternative.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1502 |
65.9% |
0.659061 |
| 1 |
Selected |
777 |
34.1% |
0.340939 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000 |
f1k1kj102_8
|
Variable label:
|
Main tasks in your work: Control/supervision/follow-up of public
measures
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Control/supervision/follow-up of public measures
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may choose more than one alternative.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1934 |
84.9% |
0.8486178 |
| 1 |
Selected |
345 |
15.1% |
0.1513822 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj102_9
|
Variable label:
|
Main tasks in your work: Information and communication work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Information and communication work
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may choose more than one alternative.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1774 |
77.8% |
0.7784116 |
| 1 |
Selected |
505 |
22.2% |
0.2215884 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj102_10
|
Variable label:
|
Main tasks in your work: User inquiries/frontline services/client
services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which of the following tasks does the majority of your work fall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
User inquiries/frontline services/client services
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may choose more than one alternative.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1976 |
86.7% |
0.867047 |
| 1 |
Selected |
303 |
13.3% |
0.132953 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000 |
f1k1kj103_1
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Law
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Law
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1956 |
85.8% |
0.8582712 |
| 1 |
Selected |
323 |
14.2% |
0.1417288 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj103_2
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education:
Finance/Management
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Finance/Management
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1828 |
80.2% |
0.8021062 |
| 1 |
Selected |
451 |
19.8% |
0.1978938 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj103_3
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education:
Political Science/Public Administration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political Science/Public Administration
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1700 |
74.6% |
0.7459412 |
| 1 |
Selected |
579 |
25.4% |
0.2540588 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj103_4
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education:
Medicine
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Medicine
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
2255 |
98.9% |
0.98946907 |
| 1 |
Selected |
24 |
1.1% |
0.01053093 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
f1k1kj103_5
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education:
Science/Engineering
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Science/Engineering
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1882 |
82.6% |
0.8258008 |
| 1 |
Selected |
397 |
17.4% |
0.1741992 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj103_6
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education:
Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other (please specify)
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1620 |
71.1% |
0.7108381 |
| 1 |
Selected |
659 |
28.9% |
0.2891619 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj103_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education:
Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other (please specify)
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:2279] [Range:-]
|
f1k1kj103_1_coded
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education: Law
[coded]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Law
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
]
[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source
variable f1k1kj103_1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1955 |
85.8% |
0.8578324 |
| 1 |
Selected |
324 |
14.2% |
0.1421676 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj103_2_coded
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education:
Finance/Management [coded]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Finance/Management
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source
variable f1k1kj103_2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1796 |
78.8% |
0.7880649 |
| 1 |
Selected |
483 |
21.2% |
0.2119351 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj103_3_coded
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education:
Political Science/Public Administration [coded]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political Science/Public Administration
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source
variable f1k1kj103_3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1689 |
74.1% |
0.7411145 |
| 1 |
Selected |
590 |
25.9% |
0.2588855 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj103_4_coded
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education:
Medicine [coded]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Medicine
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source
variable f1k1kj103_4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
2254 |
98.9% |
0.98903028 |
| 1 |
Selected |
25 |
1.1% |
0.01096972 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
f1k1kj103_5_coded
|
Variable label:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education:
Science/Engineering [coded]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Within which field of expertise is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Science/Engineering
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may tick a maximum of two alternatives
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source
variable f1k1kj103_5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
1877 |
82.4% |
0.8236068 |
| 1 |
Selected |
402 |
17.6% |
0.1763932 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
f1k1kj104
|
Variable label:
|
What is your current position level?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current position level?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Consultant/senior consultant or equivalent level |
132 |
5.8% |
0.057920140 |
| 2 |
Adviser/senior adviser or equivalent level |
1487 |
65.2% |
0.652479158 |
| 3 |
Director/special adviser or equivalent level |
312 |
13.7% |
0.136902150 |
| 4 |
Deputy Director or equivalent level |
252 |
11.1% |
0.110574814 |
| 5 |
Director General or equivalent level and above |
75 |
3.3% |
0.032909171 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.9% |
0.009214568 |
f1k1kj105_1
|
Variable label:
|
How many years have you worked in your current position?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How many years have you worked in…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…your current position?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Knudsen (UiB)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than 1 year |
331 |
14.5% |
0.14523914 |
| 2 |
1 - 5 years |
955 |
41.9% |
0.41904344 |
| 3 |
6 – 10 years |
432 |
19.0% |
0.18955682 |
| 4 |
11 – 20 years |
386 |
16.9% |
0.16937253 |
| 5 |
More than 20 years |
141 |
6.2% |
0.06186924 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
1.5% |
0.01491882 |
f1k1kj105_2
|
Variable label:
|
How many years in total have you worked in central government?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How many years in total have you worked in…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…central government (ministry/directorate/inspection authority)?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Knudsen (UiB)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than 1 year |
87 |
3.8% |
0.03817464 |
| 2 |
1 - 5 years |
399 |
17.5% |
0.17507679 |
| 3 |
6 – 10 years |
367 |
16.1% |
0.16103554 |
| 4 |
11 – 20 years |
610 |
26.8% |
0.26766125 |
| 5 |
More than 20 years |
628 |
27.6% |
0.27555946 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
188 |
8.2% |
0.08249232 |
f1k1kj106
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you look for job opportunities outside your organisation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you look for job opportunities outside your organisation?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never |
592 |
26.0% |
0.259763054 |
| 2 |
Rarely |
905 |
39.7% |
0.397103993 |
| 3 |
Occasionally |
585 |
25.7% |
0.256691531 |
| 4 |
Often |
138 |
6.1% |
0.060552874 |
| 5 |
Very often |
49 |
2.2% |
0.021500658 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004387889 |
f1k1kj107
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Would very much like to work in this organisation for
the rest of my professional life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I would very much like to work in this organisation for the rest of my
professional life.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
396 |
17.4% |
0.173760421 |
| 2 |
Agree |
591 |
25.9% |
0.259324265 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
407 |
17.9% |
0.178587100 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
323 |
14.2% |
0.141728828 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
226 |
9.9% |
0.099166301 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
219 |
9.6% |
0.096094778 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
105 |
4.6% |
0.046072839 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005265467 |
f1k1kj108
|
Variable label:
|
Are you currently, or have you ever been, a member of any political
party?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you currently, or have you ever been, a member of any political
party?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I am a member |
338 |
14.8% |
0.148310663 |
| 2 |
Yes, I have been a member |
377 |
16.5% |
0.165423431 |
| 3 |
No |
1552 |
68.1% |
0.681000439 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005265467 |
f1k1kj109
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2279]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 3 |
Both of my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but my father and I have not immigrated |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I have not immigrated |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
|
NaN |
| Sysmiss |
|
2279 |
|
NA |
f1k1kj109_recode
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Recoded version from f1k1kj109]
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
2022 |
88.7% |
0.887231242 |
| 2 |
Myself or one or both of my parents, have immigrated to Norway |
244 |
10.7% |
0.107064502 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.6% |
0.005704256 |
f1k1kj110
|
Variable label:
|
Whether most people in general can be trusted
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 – Cannot be careful enough |
6 |
0.3% |
0.0026327337 |
| 1 |
1 |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0008775779 |
| 2 |
2 |
19 |
0.8% |
0.0083369899 |
| 3 |
3 |
38 |
1.7% |
0.0166739798 |
| 4 |
4 |
41 |
1.8% |
0.0179903466 |
| 5 |
5 |
127 |
5.6% |
0.0557261957 |
| 6 |
6 |
159 |
7.0% |
0.0697674419 |
| 7 |
7 |
462 |
20.3% |
0.2027204914 |
| 8 |
8 |
682 |
29.9% |
0.2992540588 |
| 9 |
9 |
390 |
17.1% |
0.1711276876 |
| 10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
342 |
15.0% |
0.1500658183 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.0048266784 |
f1k1kj111
|
Variable label:
|
Your civil status
|
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the alternative that is most relevant
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
269 |
11.8% |
0.1180342255 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
134 |
5.9% |
0.0587977183 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
447 |
19.6% |
0.1961386573 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
1247 |
54.7% |
0.5471698113 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly a legally registered partner |
134 |
5.9% |
0.0587977183 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
20 |
0.9% |
0.0087757789 |
| 7 |
No response |
15 |
0.7% |
0.0065818341 |
| 8 |
Other: |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0008775779 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.0048266784 |
f1k1kj111_8_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Your civil status
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Civil status
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:2279] [Range:-]
|
f1k1kj111_coded
|
Variable label:
|
Your civil status [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the alternative that is most relevant
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tobias Bach (UiO)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source
variable f1k1kj111]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
269 |
11.8% |
0.118034226 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
134 |
5.9% |
0.058797718 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
447 |
19.6% |
0.196138657 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
1247 |
54.7% |
0.547169811 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly a legally registered partner |
136 |
6.0% |
0.059675296 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
20 |
0.9% |
0.008775779 |
| 7 |
No response |
15 |
0.7% |
0.006581834 |
| 8 |
Other: |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004826678 |
f1k1media_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The media plays an important role in highlighting the
fates of individuals
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements
about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media plays an important role in highlighting the fates of
individuals
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1media_1;p4k1media_1;r19k1media_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
198 |
17.2% |
0.171875000 |
| 2 |
Agree |
486 |
42.2% |
0.421875000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
290 |
25.2% |
0.251736111 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
89 |
7.7% |
0.077256944 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
48 |
4.2% |
0.041666667 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
26 |
2.3% |
0.022569444 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006944444 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006076389 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1media_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The media plays an important role in revealing matters
worthy of criticism
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements
about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media plays an important role in revealing matters worthy of
criticism
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1media_2;p4k1media_2;r19k1media_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
683 |
59.3% |
0.5928819444 |
| 2 |
Agree |
384 |
33.3% |
0.3333333333 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
65 |
5.6% |
0.0564236111 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
8 |
0.7% |
0.0069444444 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
4 |
0.3% |
0.0034722222 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008680556 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008680556 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.0052083333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1media_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The media is conflict-oriented
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements
about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media is conflict-oriented
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1media_3;p4k1media_3;r19k1media_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
284 |
24.7% |
0.246527778 |
| 2 |
Agree |
448 |
38.9% |
0.388888889 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
289 |
25.1% |
0.250868056 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
88 |
7.6% |
0.076388889 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
27 |
2.3% |
0.023437500 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006076389 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001736111 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006076389 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1media_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The media sensationalises
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements
about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media sensationalises
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1media_4;p4k1media_4;r19k1media_4
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
389 |
33.8% |
0.337673611 |
| 2 |
Agree |
432 |
37.5% |
0.375000000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
272 |
23.6% |
0.236111111 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
33 |
2.9% |
0.028645833 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
13 |
1.1% |
0.011284722 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004340278 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001736111 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005208333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1media_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The media conveys complicated issues in an
understandable way
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements
about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media conveys complicated issues in an understandable way
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1media_5;p4k1media_5;r19k1media_5
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
25 |
2.2% |
0.021701389 |
| 2 |
Agree |
308 |
26.7% |
0.267361111 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
447 |
38.8% |
0.388020833 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
159 |
13.8% |
0.138020833 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
145 |
12.6% |
0.125868056 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
58 |
5.0% |
0.050347222 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003472222 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005208333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1media_6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: News coverage is angled in a way that runs contrary to
my own views
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements
about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
|
|
Literal question:
|
News coverage is angled in a way that runs contrary to my own views
|
|
Question owner:
|
Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1media_6;p4k1media_6;r19k1media_6
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
1.2% |
0.012152778 |
| 2 |
Agree |
58 |
5.0% |
0.050347222 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
170 |
14.8% |
0.147569444 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
501 |
43.5% |
0.434895833 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
137 |
11.9% |
0.118923611 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
241 |
20.9% |
0.209201389 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
25 |
2.2% |
0.021701389 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005208333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1lobby1_1
|
Variable label:
|
The past year, how often how you received requests from: Business
organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often have you received written or oral requests from the following
types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Business organisations
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick each relevant organisation.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard
Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1lobby1_1;p4k1lobby1_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Weekly |
65 |
5.6% |
0.05642361 |
| 2 |
Monthly |
204 |
17.7% |
0.17708333 |
| 3 |
Less frequently |
427 |
37.1% |
0.37065972 |
| 4 |
Never |
425 |
36.9% |
0.36892361 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.7% |
0.02690972 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1lobby1_2
|
Variable label:
|
The past year, how often how you received requests from: Trade
unions/professional organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often have you received written or oral requests from the following
types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Trade unions and professional organisations
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick each relevant organisation.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard
Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1lobby1_2;p4k1lobby1_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Weekly |
71 |
6.2% |
0.06163194 |
| 2 |
Monthly |
298 |
25.9% |
0.25868056 |
| 3 |
Less frequently |
458 |
39.8% |
0.39756944 |
| 4 |
Never |
297 |
25.8% |
0.25781250 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
2.4% |
0.02430556 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1lobby1_3
|
Variable label:
|
The past year, how often how you received requests from: Environmental
protection organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often have you received written or oral requests from the following
types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Environmental protection organisations
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick each relevant organisation.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard
Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1lobby1_3;p4k1lobby1_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Weekly |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01822917 |
| 2 |
Monthly |
114 |
9.9% |
0.09895833 |
| 3 |
Less frequently |
433 |
37.6% |
0.37586806 |
| 4 |
Never |
551 |
47.8% |
0.47829861 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.9% |
0.02864583 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1lobby1_4
|
Variable label:
|
The past year, how often how you received requests from: Health/welfare
organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often have you received written or oral requests from the following
types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health/welfare organisations
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick each relevant organisation.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard
Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1lobby1_4;p4k1lobby1_4
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Weekly |
25 |
2.2% |
0.02170139 |
| 2 |
Monthly |
127 |
11.0% |
0.11024306 |
| 3 |
Less frequently |
442 |
38.4% |
0.38368056 |
| 4 |
Never |
524 |
45.5% |
0.45486111 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
3.0% |
0.02951389 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1lobby1_5
|
Variable label:
|
The past year, how often how you received requests from:
Cultural/sports/leisure organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often have you received written or oral requests from the following
types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cultural/sports/leisure organisations
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick each relevant organisation.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard
Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1lobby1_5;p4k1lobby1_5
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Weekly |
44 |
3.8% |
0.03819444 |
| 2 |
Monthly |
130 |
11.3% |
0.11284722 |
| 3 |
Less frequently |
404 |
35.1% |
0.35069444 |
| 4 |
Never |
538 |
46.7% |
0.46701389 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
3.1% |
0.03125000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1lobby1_6
|
Variable label:
|
The past year, how often how you received requests from: PR
agencies/communications agencies
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often have you received written or oral requests from the following
types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
PR agencies/communications agencies
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick each relevant organisation.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard
Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1lobby1_6;p4k1lobby1_6
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Weekly |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008680556 |
| 2 |
Monthly |
60 |
5.2% |
0.052083333 |
| 3 |
Less frequently |
342 |
29.7% |
0.296875000 |
| 4 |
Never |
708 |
61.5% |
0.614583333 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
2.8% |
0.027777778 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1lobby102_1
|
Variable label:
|
How often the processing of cases in your ministry/directorate is
influenced by: Business organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Generally speaking and in the ministry/directorate where you work, how
often would you say that the following actors influence the processing
of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Business organisations
|
|
Question owner:
|
Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard
Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
68 |
5.9% |
0.05902778 |
| 2 |
Quite often |
229 |
19.9% |
0.19878472 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
349 |
30.3% |
0.30295139 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
124 |
10.8% |
0.10763889 |
| 5 |
Very rarely |
153 |
13.3% |
0.13281250 |
| 6 |
Never |
154 |
13.4% |
0.13368056 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
6.5% |
0.06510417 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1lobby102_2
|
Variable label:
|
How often the processing of cases in your ministry/directorate is
influenced by: Trade unions/professional organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Generally speaking and in the ministry/directorate where you work, how
often would you say that the following actors influence the processing
of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Trade unions and professional organisations
|
|
Question owner:
|
Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard
Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
45 |
3.9% |
0.0390625 |
| 2 |
Quite often |
206 |
17.9% |
0.1788194 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
345 |
29.9% |
0.2994792 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
174 |
15.1% |
0.1510417 |
| 5 |
Very rarely |
161 |
14.0% |
0.1397569 |
| 6 |
Never |
140 |
12.2% |
0.1215278 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
7.0% |
0.0703125 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1lobby102_3
|
Variable label:
|
How often the processing of cases in your ministry/directorate is
influenced by: Environmental protection organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Generally speaking and in the ministry/directorate where you work, how
often would you say that the following actors influence the processing
of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Environmental protection organisations
|
|
Question owner:
|
Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard
Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
43 |
3.7% |
0.03732639 |
| 2 |
Quite often |
123 |
10.7% |
0.10677083 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
279 |
24.2% |
0.24218750 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
154 |
13.4% |
0.13368056 |
| 5 |
Very rarely |
213 |
18.5% |
0.18489583 |
| 6 |
Never |
260 |
22.6% |
0.22569444 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
80 |
6.9% |
0.06944444 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1lobby102_4
|
Variable label:
|
How often the processing of cases in your ministry/directorate is
influenced by: Health/welfare organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Generally speaking and in the ministry/directorate where you work, how
often would you say that the following actors influence the processing
of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health/welfare organisations
|
|
Question owner:
|
Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard
Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
29 |
2.5% |
0.02517361 |
| 2 |
Quite often |
99 |
8.6% |
0.08593750 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
252 |
21.9% |
0.21875000 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
191 |
16.6% |
0.16579861 |
| 5 |
Very rarely |
240 |
20.8% |
0.20833333 |
| 6 |
Never |
258 |
22.4% |
0.22395833 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
7.2% |
0.07204861 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1lobby102_5
|
Variable label:
|
How often the processing of cases in your ministry/directorate is
influenced by: Cultural/sports/leisure organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Generally speaking and in the ministry/directorate where you work, how
often would you say that the following actors influence the processing
of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cultural/sports/leisure organisations
|
|
Question owner:
|
Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard
Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01822917 |
| 2 |
Quite often |
64 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
190 |
16.5% |
0.16493056 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
188 |
16.3% |
0.16319444 |
| 5 |
Very rarely |
267 |
23.2% |
0.23177083 |
| 6 |
Never |
333 |
28.9% |
0.28906250 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
7.7% |
0.07725694 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1lobby102_6
|
Variable label:
|
How often the processing of cases in your ministry/directorate is
influenced by: PR agencies/communications agencies
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Generally speaking and in the ministry/directorate where you work, how
often would you say that the following actors influence the processing
of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest?
|
|
Literal question:
|
PR agencies/communications agencies
|
|
Question owner:
|
Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard
Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
20 |
1.7% |
0.01736111 |
| 2 |
Quite often |
75 |
6.5% |
0.06510417 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
203 |
17.6% |
0.17621528 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
158 |
13.7% |
0.13715278 |
| 5 |
Very rarely |
275 |
23.9% |
0.23871528 |
| 6 |
Never |
329 |
28.6% |
0.28559028 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
92 |
8.0% |
0.07986111 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Respondents are randomly assigned into four groups. Tre
experiment groups and one control group.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1_ran1;r19k1selvstyre1_ran1;p4k1selvstyre1_ran1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 1]
[Experiment. Respondents are randomly assigned into four groups. Tre
experiment groups and one control group.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1120] [Invalid:1159]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A |
277 |
24.7% |
0.2473214 |
| 2 |
B |
299 |
26.7% |
0.2669643 |
| 3 |
C |
265 |
23.7% |
0.2366071 |
| 4 |
D |
279 |
24.9% |
0.2491071 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1159 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: Whether schools
must close during a pandemic
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1a_1;p4k1selvstyre1a_1;r19k1selvstyre1a_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
14 |
5.1% |
0.05054152 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
101 |
36.5% |
0.36462094 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
82 |
29.6% |
0.29602888 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
57 |
20.6% |
0.20577617 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
16 |
5.8% |
0.05776173 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
2.5% |
0.02527076 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2002 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: On the development
of wind power in municipalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1a_2;p4k1selvstyre1a_2;r19k1selvstyre1a_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
18 |
6.5% |
0.06498195 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
77 |
27.8% |
0.27797834 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
81 |
29.2% |
0.29241877 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
73 |
26.4% |
0.26353791 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
22 |
7.9% |
0.07942238 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02166065 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2002 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the
shoreline building can take place
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1a_3;p4k1selvstyre1a_3;r19k1selvstyre1a_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
11 |
4.0% |
0.03971119 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
46 |
16.6% |
0.16606498 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
49 |
17.7% |
0.17689531 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
120 |
43.3% |
0.43321300 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
45 |
16.2% |
0.16245487 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02166065 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2002 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How large primary
school classes should be
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide how large primary school classes should be?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1a_4;p4k1selvstyre1a_4;r19k1selvstyre1a_4
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
15 |
5.4% |
0.05415162 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
75 |
27.1% |
0.27075812 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
60 |
21.7% |
0.21660650 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
101 |
36.5% |
0.36462094 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
20 |
7.2% |
0.07220217 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02166065 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2002 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1b_primer
|
Variable label:
|
Should it be up to the municipalities or the state to decide whether
schools must close during a pandemic?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that there is a severe pandemic outbreak in Norway. Infection
control experts disagree on whether closing schools will slow the
pandemic.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to
decide whether schools must be closed during a pandemic?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1b_primer;p4k1selvstyre1b_primer;r19k1selvstyre1b_primer
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
7 |
2.3% |
0.02341137 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
67 |
22.4% |
0.22408027 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
76 |
25.4% |
0.25418060 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
126 |
42.1% |
0.42140468 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
19 |
6.4% |
0.06354515 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01337793 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1980 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: On the development
of wind power in municipalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1b_1;p4k1selvstyre1b_1;r19k1selvstyre1b_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
19 |
6.4% |
0.06354515 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
77 |
25.8% |
0.25752508 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
107 |
35.8% |
0.35785953 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
83 |
27.8% |
0.27759197 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
10 |
3.3% |
0.03344482 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
1.0% |
0.01003344 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1980 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the
shoreline building can take place
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1b_2;p4k1selvstyre1b_2;r19k1selvstyre1b_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
8 |
2.7% |
0.02675585 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
49 |
16.4% |
0.16387960 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
62 |
20.7% |
0.20735786 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
116 |
38.8% |
0.38795987 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
60 |
20.1% |
0.20066890 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01337793 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1980 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How large primary
school classes should be
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide how large primary school classes should be?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1b_3;p4k1selvstyre1b_3;r19k1selvstyre1b_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
8 |
2.7% |
0.02675585 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
65 |
21.7% |
0.21739130 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
79 |
26.4% |
0.26421405 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
95 |
31.8% |
0.31772575 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
49 |
16.4% |
0.16387960 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
1.0% |
0.01003344 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1980 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1c_primer
|
Variable label:
|
Should it be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide on
the size of primary school classes?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the issue regarding the size of primary school classes is
to be decided. The pedagogical community does not agree on which class
size is best regarding the learning and well-being of pupils.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to
decide on the size of primary school classes?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1c_primer;p4k1selvstyre1c_primer;r19k1selvstyre1c_primer
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
14 |
5.3% |
0.05283019 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
72 |
27.2% |
0.27169811 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
47 |
17.7% |
0.17735849 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
108 |
40.8% |
0.40754717 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
21 |
7.9% |
0.07924528 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01132075 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2014 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: On the development
of wind power in municipalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1c_1;p4k1selvstyre1c_1;r19k1selvstyre1c_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
26 |
9.8% |
0.09811321 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
70 |
26.4% |
0.26415094 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
77 |
29.1% |
0.29056604 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
74 |
27.9% |
0.27924528 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
15 |
5.7% |
0.05660377 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01132075 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2014 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the
shoreline building can take place
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1c_2;p4k1selvstyre1c_2;r19k1selvstyre1c_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
12 |
4.5% |
0.04528302 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
44 |
16.6% |
0.16603774 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
50 |
18.9% |
0.18867925 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
105 |
39.6% |
0.39622642 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
52 |
19.6% |
0.19622642 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.8% |
0.00754717 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2014 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1c_3
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the get state to decide: Whether schools
must close during a pandemic
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1c_3;p4k1selvstyre1c_3;r19k1selvstyre1c_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
16 |
6.0% |
0.06037736 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
84 |
31.7% |
0.31698113 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
82 |
30.9% |
0.30943396 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
61 |
23.0% |
0.23018868 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
20 |
7.5% |
0.07547170 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.8% |
0.00754717 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2014 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1d_primer
|
Variable label:
|
Should it be up to the municipalities or to the state to decide on the
development of wind power in individual municipalities?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a committee proposes significant wind power development in
Norway. Environmental management experts disagree on whether the value
of climate-friendly energy can justify the damage to nature that will
result from the development.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to
decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1d_primer;p4k1selvstyre1d_primer;r19k1selvstyre1d_primer
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
18 |
6.5% |
0.06451613 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
72 |
25.8% |
0.25806452 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
82 |
29.4% |
0.29390681 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
93 |
33.3% |
0.33333333 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
11 |
3.9% |
0.03942652 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01075269 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2000 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1d_1
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: Whether schools
must close during a pandemic
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1d_1;p4k1selvstyre1d_1;r19k1selvstyre1d_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
22 |
7.9% |
0.07885305 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
103 |
36.9% |
0.36917563 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
74 |
26.5% |
0.26523297 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
65 |
23.3% |
0.23297491 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
12 |
4.3% |
0.04301075 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01075269 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2000 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1d_2
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the
shoreline building can take place
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1d_2;p4k1selvstyre1d_2;r19k1selvstyre1d_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
16 |
5.7% |
0.05734767 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
40 |
14.3% |
0.14336918 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
54 |
19.4% |
0.19354839 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
119 |
42.7% |
0.42652330 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
46 |
16.5% |
0.16487455 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01433692 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2000 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre1d_3
|
Variable label:
|
Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How large primary
school classes should be
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state
to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
decide how large primary school classes should be?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre1d_3;p4k1selvstyre1d_3;r19k1selvstyre1d_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1 & f1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]
[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation
in f1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Totally up to the municipalities |
19 |
6.8% |
0.06810036 |
| 2 |
Mostly up to the municipalities |
60 |
21.5% |
0.21505376 |
| 3 |
As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state |
52 |
18.6% |
0.18637993 |
| 4 |
Mostly up to the state |
110 |
39.4% |
0.39426523 |
| 5 |
Totally up to the state |
34 |
12.2% |
0.12186380 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01433692 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2000 |
|
NA |
f1k1selvstyre2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norwegian democracy could have worked just as well
without local self-government
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian democracy could have worked just as well without local
self-government.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1selvstyre2;p4k1selvstyre2;r19k1selvstyre2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
17 |
1.5% |
0.01475694 |
| 2 |
Agree |
33 |
2.9% |
0.02864583 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
74 |
6.4% |
0.06423611 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
78 |
6.8% |
0.06770833 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
150 |
13.0% |
0.13020833 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
438 |
38.0% |
0.38020833 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
318 |
27.6% |
0.27604167 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
3.8% |
0.03819444 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1dommere1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent appointment of Supreme Court justices should take into
account social and cultural diversity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Provided that applicants to the Supreme Court of Norway’s judicial
offices have the necessary professional qualifications, applicant
assessments may also take into account that the Supreme Court should
reflect Norway both socially and culturally.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think that the appointment of Supreme Court
justices should take into account the social and cultural diversity
found in society?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gunnar Grendstad (UiB); Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim
(UiB); Jon Kåre Skiple (NORCE); Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE); Ingvild
Misje (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1dommere1;p4k1dommere1;r19k1dommere1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
145 |
12.6% |
0.12586806 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
344 |
29.9% |
0.29861111 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
403 |
35.0% |
0.34982639 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
136 |
11.8% |
0.11805556 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
73 |
6.3% |
0.06336806 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
4.4% |
0.04427083 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1dommere2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent Supreme Court justices must have ‘insight and involvement
in general societal issues’
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The assessment of applicants to the judicial offices must follow the
applicable guidelines.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the guidelines that say Supreme Court
justices must have ‘insight and involvement in general societal issues’?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gunnar Grendstad (UiB); Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim
(UiB); Jon Kåre Skiple (NORCE); Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE); Ingvild
Misje (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1dommere2;p4k1dommere2;r19k1dommere2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
343 |
29.8% |
0.297743056 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
524 |
45.5% |
0.454861111 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
194 |
16.8% |
0.168402778 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
31 |
2.7% |
0.026909722 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004340278 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
4.8% |
0.047743056 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1dommere3_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1dommere3.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1dommere3_ran1;p4k1dommere3_ran1;r19k1dommere3_ran1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 1]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1dommere3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1107] [Invalid:1172]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[BLANK] |
529 |
47.8% |
0.4778681 |
| 2 |
14 out of 20 justices are born in the Oslo area, 18 out of 20 justices have been
educated in Oslo, and 17 of the justices have spent at least 80 percent of their
working lives in Oslo. |
578 |
52.2% |
0.5221319 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1172 |
|
NA |
f1k1dommere3
|
Variable label:
|
How important that the Supreme Court of Norway has a composition of
justices that reflects Norway geographically
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Supreme Court of Norway is the judicial branch and makes an
increasing number of decisions that bring the court of law closer to the
Storting which is the legislative branch. [k1dommere3_ran1]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think it is that the Supreme Court of Norway has a
composition of justices that reflects Norway geographically?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gunnar Grendstad (UiB); Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim
(UiB); Jon Kåre Skiple (NORCE); Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE); Ingvild
Misje (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1dommere3;p4k1dommere3;r19k1dommere3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1dommere3_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
143 |
12.4% |
0.12413194 |
| 2 |
Important |
347 |
30.1% |
0.30121528 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
339 |
29.4% |
0.29427083 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
214 |
18.6% |
0.18576389 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
54 |
4.7% |
0.04687500 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
4.8% |
0.04774306 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1udidir1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1udidir1.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1udidir1_ran1;p4k1udidir1_ran1;r19k1udidir1_ran1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 1]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1udidir1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1103] [Invalid:1176]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The new director has several years of experience in the field of immigration.
Hansen has extensive political experience and has recently been a state
secretary (deputy minister) in the Ministry of Justice and Public Security. |
281 |
25.5% |
0.2547597 |
| 2 |
The new director does not have experience in the field of immigration. Hansen
has extensive political experience and has recently been a state secretary
(deputy minister) in the Ministry of Transport. |
265 |
24.0% |
0.2402539 |
| 3 |
The new director has several years of experience in the field of immigration.
Hansen arrives after leaving his position as Director General (administrative
deputy) in the Ministry of Justice and Public Security. He has also held several
other positions in central administration. |
294 |
26.7% |
0.2665458 |
| 4 |
The new director does not have experience in the field of immigration. Hansen
arrives after leaving his position as Director General (administrative deputy)
in the Ministry of Transport. He has also held several other positions in
central administration. |
263 |
23.8% |
0.2384406 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1176 |
|
NA |
f1k1udidir1
|
Variable label:
|
How well qualified is Jan Hansen regarding the position of director at
the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a case where a person, Jan Hansen, is employed as the new
director of the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI). The
Norwegian Directorate of Immigration is governed by the Ministry of
Justice and Public Security and implements the Government’s refugee and
immigration policies. [k1udidir1_ran1]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How well qualified do you think Jan Hansen is regarding the position of
director at the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p4k1udidir1;r19k1udidir1;j1k1udidir1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1udidir1_ran1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well qualified |
81 |
7.0% |
0.07031250 |
| 2 |
Well qualified |
316 |
27.4% |
0.27430556 |
| 3 |
Somewhat qualified |
206 |
17.9% |
0.17881944 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly qualified |
194 |
16.8% |
0.16840278 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly qualified |
146 |
12.7% |
0.12673611 |
| 6 |
Poorly qualified |
114 |
9.9% |
0.09895833 |
| 7 |
Very poorly qualified |
33 |
2.9% |
0.02864583 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
62 |
5.4% |
0.05381944 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1udidir2
|
Variable label:
|
What advice do you think UDI’s Director Hansen will give the minister on
how the case should be handled politically?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a case emerging where government policy is clearly in violation
of a recommendation set out by experts from the Norwegian Directorate of
Immigration. The Minister of Justice and Public Security is aware of the
professional recommendation, but still asks UDI’s Director Jan Hansen
for advice on how the case should be handled politically.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What advice do you think Hansen will give the minister?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1udidir2;p4k1udidir2;r19k1udidir2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To fully follow the professional recommendation |
156 |
13.5% |
0.13541667 |
| 2 |
To follow the professional recommendation to a large extent |
486 |
42.2% |
0.42187500 |
| 3 |
To follow the professional recommendation to some extent |
165 |
14.3% |
0.14322917 |
| 4 |
Follow both in equal measures |
68 |
5.9% |
0.05902778 |
| 5 |
To follow the Government’s original policy to some extent |
82 |
7.1% |
0.07118056 |
| 6 |
To follow the Government’s original policy to a large extent |
95 |
8.2% |
0.08246528 |
| 7 |
To fully follow the Government’s original policy |
20 |
1.7% |
0.01736111 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
80 |
6.9% |
0.06944444 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1udidir3
|
Variable label:
|
How do you think UDI’s Director Hansen will resolve this case
practically?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Minister of Justice and Public Security decides to disregard the
professional recommendation. As Director of UDI, Jan Hansen can still
influence how the case is practically resolved.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think Hansen will resolve this case?
|
|
Post-question:
|
He will…:
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1udidir3;p4k1udidir3;r19k1udidir3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Fully follow the professional recommendation |
28 |
2.4% |
0.02430556 |
| 2 |
Follow the professional recommendation to a large extent |
125 |
10.9% |
0.10850694 |
| 3 |
Follow the professional recommendation to some extent |
119 |
10.3% |
0.10329861 |
| 4 |
Follow the professional recommendation and the political decision in equal
measures |
158 |
13.7% |
0.13715278 |
| 5 |
Follow government policy to some extent |
125 |
10.9% |
0.10850694 |
| 6 |
Follow government policy to a large extent |
327 |
28.4% |
0.28385417 |
| 7 |
Fully follow government policy |
180 |
15.6% |
0.15625000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
7.8% |
0.07812500 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1udidir4
|
Variable label:
|
How UDI’s Director Hansen will manage the new government’s less
restrictive refugee and immigration policy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that there is a change of government and the new government has
a new, less restrictive refugee and immigration policy.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think Hansen as UDI’s Director will manage the new government
policy?
|
|
Post-question:
|
He will…
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1udidir4;p4k1udidir4;r19k1udidir4
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Fully implement the new government policy |
307 |
26.6% |
0.266493056 |
| 2 |
Implement the new government policy to a large extent |
435 |
37.8% |
0.377604167 |
| 3 |
Implement the new government policy to some extent |
129 |
11.2% |
0.111979167 |
| 4 |
Try to find solutions that are halfway between the new government policy and the
old, more restrictive policy |
137 |
11.9% |
0.118923611 |
| 5 |
Retain the old, restrictive policy to some extent |
29 |
2.5% |
0.025173611 |
| 6 |
Retain the old, restrictive policy to a large extent |
19 |
1.6% |
0.016493056 |
| 7 |
Fully retain the old, restrictive policy |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002604167 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
93 |
8.1% |
0.080729167 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1demtech1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Do their job without being influenced by their own political views:
Public sector bureaucrats
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following
professions to do their job without being influenced by their own
political views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Public sector bureaucrats
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1demtech1_1;p4k1demtech1_1;r19k1demtech1_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
296 |
25.7% |
0.256944444 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
632 |
54.9% |
0.548611111 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
116 |
10.1% |
0.100694444 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
24 |
2.1% |
0.020833333 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006076389 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
77 |
6.7% |
0.066840278 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1demtech1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Do their job without being influenced by their own political views:
Teachers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following
professions to do their job without being influenced by their own
political views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Teachers
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1demtech1_2;p4k1demtech1_2;r19k1demtech1_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
173 |
15.0% |
0.150173611 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
555 |
48.2% |
0.481770833 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
282 |
24.5% |
0.244791667 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
60 |
5.2% |
0.052083333 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006076389 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
6.5% |
0.065104167 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1demtech1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Do their job without being influenced by their own political views:
Journalists
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following
professions to do their job without being influenced by their own
political views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Journalists
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1demtech1_3;p4k1demtech1_3;r19k1demtech1_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
61 |
5.3% |
0.05295139 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
275 |
23.9% |
0.23871528 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
454 |
39.4% |
0.39409722 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
232 |
20.1% |
0.20138889 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
53 |
4.6% |
0.04600694 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
77 |
6.7% |
0.06684028 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1demtech1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Do their job without being influenced by their own political views:
Researchers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following
professions to do their job without being influenced by their own
political views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Researchers
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1demtech1_4;p4k1demtech1_4;r19k1demtech1_4
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
239 |
20.7% |
0.207465278 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
550 |
47.7% |
0.477430556 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
226 |
19.6% |
0.196180556 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
56 |
4.9% |
0.048611111 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006076389 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
6.4% |
0.064236111 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1demtech1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Do their job without being influenced by their own political views:
Judges
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following
professions to do their job without being influenced by their own
political views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Judges
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1demtech1_5;p4k1demtech1_5;r19k1demtech1_5
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
418 |
36.3% |
0.362847222 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
528 |
45.8% |
0.458333333 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
107 |
9.3% |
0.092881944 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
22 |
1.9% |
0.019097222 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004340278 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
6.2% |
0.062500000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1demtech2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Crisis
management
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on
different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most
influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence.
Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Crisis management
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1demtech2_1;p4k1demtech2_1;r19k1demtech2_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Politicians should have full influence over the issue |
15 |
1.3% |
0.01302083 |
| 2 |
Politicians should have much more influence than experts |
57 |
4.9% |
0.04947917 |
| 3 |
Politicians should have more influence than experts |
236 |
20.5% |
0.20486111 |
| 4 |
Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence |
243 |
21.1% |
0.21093750 |
| 5 |
Experts should have more influence than politicians |
278 |
24.1% |
0.24131944 |
| 6 |
Experts should have much more influence than politicians |
195 |
16.9% |
0.16927083 |
| 7 |
Experts should have full influence over the issue |
42 |
3.6% |
0.03645833 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
86 |
7.5% |
0.07465278 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1demtech2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Finance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on
different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most
influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence.
Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Finance
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1demtech2_2;p4k1demtech2_2;r19k1demtech2_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Politicians should have full influence over the issue |
20 |
1.7% |
0.01736111 |
| 2 |
Politicians should have much more influence than experts |
129 |
11.2% |
0.11197917 |
| 3 |
Politicians should have more influence than experts |
314 |
27.3% |
0.27256944 |
| 4 |
Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence |
267 |
23.2% |
0.23177083 |
| 5 |
Experts should have more influence than politicians |
232 |
20.1% |
0.20138889 |
| 6 |
Experts should have much more influence than politicians |
90 |
7.8% |
0.07812500 |
| 7 |
Experts should have full influence over the issue |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01041667 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
88 |
7.6% |
0.07638889 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1demtech2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Immigration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on
different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most
influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence.
Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigration
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1demtech2_3;p4k1demtech2_3;r19k1demtech2_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Politicians should have full influence over the issue |
35 |
3.0% |
0.03038194 |
| 2 |
Politicians should have much more influence than experts |
169 |
14.7% |
0.14670139 |
| 3 |
Politicians should have more influence than experts |
333 |
28.9% |
0.28906250 |
| 4 |
Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence |
297 |
25.8% |
0.25781250 |
| 5 |
Experts should have more influence than politicians |
149 |
12.9% |
0.12934028 |
| 6 |
Experts should have much more influence than politicians |
67 |
5.8% |
0.05815972 |
| 7 |
Experts should have full influence over the issue |
15 |
1.3% |
0.01302083 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
7.6% |
0.07552083 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1demtech2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Criminal
policy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on
different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most
influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence.
Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Criminal policy
|
|
Question owner:
|
Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1demtech2_4;p4k1demtech2_4;r19k1demtech2_4
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Politicians should have full influence over the issue |
26 |
2.3% |
0.02256944 |
| 2 |
Politicians should have much more influence than experts |
138 |
12.0% |
0.11979167 |
| 3 |
Politicians should have more influence than experts |
278 |
24.1% |
0.24131944 |
| 4 |
Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence |
237 |
20.6% |
0.20572917 |
| 5 |
Experts should have more influence than politicians |
225 |
19.5% |
0.19531250 |
| 6 |
Experts should have much more influence than politicians |
140 |
12.2% |
0.12152778 |
| 7 |
Experts should have full influence over the issue |
20 |
1.7% |
0.01736111 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
88 |
7.6% |
0.07638889 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1127 |
|
NA |
f1k1kj112
|
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1kj112;p4k1kj112;r19k1kj112
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than 150 000 |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001774623 |
| 2 |
150 001 – 300 000 |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006211180 |
| 3 |
300 001 – 400 000 |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001774623 |
| 4 |
400 001 – 500 000 |
33 |
2.9% |
0.029281278 |
| 5 |
500 001 – 600 000 |
204 |
18.1% |
0.181011535 |
| 6 |
600 001 – 700 000 |
295 |
26.2% |
0.261756877 |
| 7 |
700 001 – 800 000 |
230 |
20.4% |
0.204081633 |
| 8 |
800 001 – 900 000 |
145 |
12.9% |
0.128660160 |
| 9 |
900 001 – 1 000 000 |
85 |
7.5% |
0.075421473 |
| 10 |
1 000 001 – 1 100 000 |
62 |
5.5% |
0.055013310 |
| 11 |
More than 1 100 000 |
54 |
4.8% |
0.047914818 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.7% |
0.007098492 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1sentral1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Central authorities show little consideration for
non-urban/rural Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Central authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1sentral1;p4k1sentral1;r19k1sentral1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
55 |
4.9% |
0.048802130 |
| 2 |
Agree |
113 |
10.0% |
0.100266193 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
269 |
23.9% |
0.238686779 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
210 |
18.6% |
0.186335404 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
160 |
14.2% |
0.141969831 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
253 |
22.4% |
0.224489796 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
61 |
5.4% |
0.054125998 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005323869 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1sentral2
|
Variable label:
|
Where do you think it is best for children to grow up?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where do you think it is best for children to grow up?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1sentral2;p4k1sentral2;r19k1sentral2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A big city |
49 |
4.3% |
0.043478261 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a big city |
174 |
15.4% |
0.154392192 |
| 3 |
A small or medium-sized city |
285 |
25.3% |
0.252883762 |
| 4 |
A village |
85 |
7.5% |
0.075421473 |
| 5 |
A sparsely populated area |
22 |
2.0% |
0.019520852 |
| 6 |
It does not matter |
506 |
44.9% |
0.448979592 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005323869 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1sentral3_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects f1k1sentral3a or f1k1sentral3b.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1sentral3_ran1;p4k1sentral3_ran1;r19k1sentral3_ran1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Randomly selects f1k1sentral3a or f1k1sentral3b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1127] [Invalid:1152]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selects k1sentral3a |
566 |
50.2% |
0.5022183 |
| 2 |
Selects k1sentral3b |
561 |
49.8% |
0.4977817 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1sentral3a
|
Variable label:
|
What do you agree with the most: Public institutions should be A)
larger/fewer or B) smaller/several
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Generally speaking, which of the following statements do you agree with
the most:
|
|
Literal question:
|
A: There should be larger and fewer public institutions, such as
municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police
districts.
B: There should be smaller and more public institutions, such as
municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police
districts.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1sentral3a;p4k1sentral3a;r19k1sentral3a
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2 & f1k1sentral3_ran1 = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree with A |
34 |
6.0% |
0.060070671 |
| 2 |
Agree much more with A |
53 |
9.4% |
0.093639576 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat more with A |
179 |
31.6% |
0.316254417 |
| 4 |
Equally agree with A and B |
92 |
16.3% |
0.162544170 |
| 5 |
Agree somewhat more with B |
135 |
23.9% |
0.238515901 |
| 6 |
Agree much more with B |
52 |
9.2% |
0.091872792 |
| 7 |
Completely agree with B |
18 |
3.2% |
0.031802120 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.5% |
0.005300353 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1713 |
|
NA |
f1k1sentral3b
|
Variable label:
|
What do you agree with the most: Public institutions should be A)
smaller/several or B) larger/fewer
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Generally speaking, which of the following statements do you agree with
the most:
|
|
Literal question:
|
A: There should be smaller and more public institutions, such as
municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police
districts.
B: There should be larger and fewer public institutions, such as
municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police
districts.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1sentral3b;p4k1sentral3b;r19k1sentral3b
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2 & f1k1sentral3_ran1 = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree with A |
40 |
7.1% |
0.071301248 |
| 2 |
Agree much more with A |
48 |
8.6% |
0.085561497 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat more with A |
140 |
25.0% |
0.249554367 |
| 4 |
Equally agree with A and B |
97 |
17.3% |
0.172905526 |
| 5 |
Agree somewhat more with B |
142 |
25.3% |
0.253119430 |
| 6 |
Agree much more with B |
67 |
11.9% |
0.119429590 |
| 7 |
Completely agree with B |
25 |
4.5% |
0.044563280 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003565062 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1718 |
|
NA |
f1k1ulikhet1_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Hard
work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person
has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hard work
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ulikhet1_1;p4k1ulikhet1_1;r19k1ulikhet1_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
450 |
39.9% |
0.399290151 |
| 2 |
Agree |
456 |
40.5% |
0.404614020 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
138 |
12.2% |
0.122448980 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
54 |
4.8% |
0.047914818 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
11 |
1.0% |
0.009760426 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
8 |
0.7% |
0.007098492 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002661934 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006211180 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ulikhet1_2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Luck
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person
has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Luck
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ulikhet1_2;p4k1ulikhet1_2;r19k1ulikhet1_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
95 |
8.4% |
0.08429459 |
| 2 |
Agree |
192 |
17.0% |
0.17036380 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
180 |
16.0% |
0.15971606 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
353 |
31.3% |
0.31322094 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
98 |
8.7% |
0.08695652 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
107 |
9.5% |
0.09494232 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
80 |
7.1% |
0.07098492 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
2.0% |
0.01952085 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ulikhet1_3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to:
Talent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person
has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Talent
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ulikhet1_3;p4k1ulikhet1_3;r19k1ulikhet1_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
256 |
22.7% |
0.227151730 |
| 2 |
Agree |
486 |
43.1% |
0.431233363 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
225 |
20.0% |
0.199645075 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
99 |
8.8% |
0.087843833 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
28 |
2.5% |
0.024844720 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
11 |
1.0% |
0.009760426 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006211180 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
1.3% |
0.013309672 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ulikhet1_4
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to:
Family
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person
has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Family
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ulikhet1_4;p4k1ulikhet1_4;r19k1ulikhet1_4
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
100 |
8.9% |
0.08873114 |
| 2 |
Agree |
205 |
18.2% |
0.18189885 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
197 |
17.5% |
0.17480035 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
228 |
20.2% |
0.20230701 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
169 |
15.0% |
0.14995563 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
126 |
11.2% |
0.11180124 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
83 |
7.4% |
0.07364685 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.7% |
0.01685892 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ulikhet2_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1ulikhet2.]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ulikhet2_ran1;p4k1ulikhet2_ran1;r19k1ulikhet2_ran1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1ulikhet2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1127] [Invalid:1152]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[BLANK] |
396 |
35.1% |
0.3513753 |
| 2 |
In Norway, the richest 10 percent of households own half of Norway’s private
wealth. |
386 |
34.3% |
0.3425022 |
| 3 |
In Norway today, the poorest 50 percent of households own 5 percent of Norway’s
private wealth. |
345 |
30.6% |
0.3061224 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ulikhet2_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1ulikhet2.]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ulikhet2_ran2;p4k1ulikhet2_ran2;r19k1ulikhet2_ran2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1ulikhet2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1127] [Invalid:1152]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
unequal political influence and power |
277 |
24.6% |
0.2457853 |
| 2 |
unequal life opportunities |
281 |
24.9% |
0.2493345 |
| 3 |
increased crime |
292 |
25.9% |
0.2590949 |
| 4 |
greater economic differences between men and women |
277 |
24.6% |
0.2457853 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ulikhet2_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1ulikhet2.]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ulikhet2_ran3;p4k1ulikhet2_ran3;r19k1ulikhet2_ran3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1ulikhet2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1127] [Invalid:1152]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Reintroducing inheritance tax |
287 |
25.5% |
0.2546584 |
| 2 |
Increasing wealth tax |
283 |
25.1% |
0.2511091 |
| 3 |
Raising taxes on very high incomes |
286 |
25.4% |
0.2537711 |
| 4 |
State capital transfers of approximately NOK 1 million to all Norwegian citizens
when they turn 27 years old |
271 |
24.0% |
0.2404614 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ulikhet2
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion on political propsal aimed at reducing wealth inequality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know your opinion on a political proposal aimed at
reducing wealth inequality. [k1ulikhet2_ran1] Although wealth inequality
may be fair for various reasons, it may lead to [k1ulikhet2_ran2].
[k1ulikhet2_ran3] may reduce wealth inequality.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you oppose or support such a proposal?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p4k1ulikhet2;j1k1ulikhet2;r19k1ulikhet2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1ulikhet2_ran1-f1k1ulikhet2_ran3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strongly oppose |
77 |
6.8% |
0.068322981 |
| 2 |
Strongly oppose |
127 |
11.3% |
0.112688554 |
| 3 |
Somewhat oppose |
165 |
14.6% |
0.146406389 |
| 4 |
Neither oppose nor support |
136 |
12.1% |
0.120674357 |
| 5 |
Somewhat support |
292 |
25.9% |
0.259094942 |
| 6 |
Support strongly |
209 |
18.5% |
0.185448092 |
| 7 |
Very strongly support |
110 |
9.8% |
0.097604259 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.0% |
0.009760426 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1miljo2
|
Variable label:
|
Overall, what do you think about the efforts being made to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions in Norway?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has set itself the objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions
to prevent harmful climate change. In order to achieve the objective of
reducing emissions, a number of measures have been initiated.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Overall, what do you think about the efforts being made to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions in Norway?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1miljo2;p4k1miljo2;r19k1miljo2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Random direction]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The efforts are too small |
702 |
62.3% |
0.622892635 |
| 2 |
The efforts are appropriate |
364 |
32.3% |
0.322981366 |
| 3 |
The efforts are too great |
50 |
4.4% |
0.044365572 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.0% |
0.009760426 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1miljo3
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think about the technology used to limit climate change?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
One of the measures that Norway has worked on to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions is the capture and storage of CO2 (carbon dioxide). On a large
scale, the technology can play an important role in limiting climate
change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about this technology?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1miljo3;p4k1miljo3;r19k1miljo3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Random direction]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very negative |
26 |
2.3% |
0.02307010 |
| 2 |
Slightly negative |
67 |
5.9% |
0.05944987 |
| 3 |
Slightly positive |
365 |
32.4% |
0.32386868 |
| 4 |
Very positive |
457 |
40.6% |
0.40550133 |
| 5 |
No opinion / do not know |
198 |
17.6% |
0.17568767 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01242236 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1poladm_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1poladm.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p4k1poladm_ran
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1poladm.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1120] [Invalid:1159]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
One alternative appears to be by far the best in a professional sense, but it is
an alternative the political leadership does not want. |
570 |
50.9% |
0.5089286 |
| 2 |
Although there is considerable professional disagreement, one alternative
appears to be the best in a professional sense, but it is an alternative the
political leadership does not want. |
550 |
49.1% |
0.4910714 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1159 |
|
NA |
f1k1poladm
|
Variable label:
|
What the administration should do when their proposal is unlikely to be
adopted
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the political leadership has asked the administration to
study and promote a proposed resolution in a difficult case related to
the development and financing of roads. The case involves a number of
aspects (natural areas, pollution, road tolls) about which there is
considerable political conflict. The study is based on expertise from
internal administration and from external experts (researchers).
[k1poladm_ran]
It is unlikely that the proposal will be adopted.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think is the most correct thing for the administration to do
in such a situation?
|
|
Post-question:
|
You may only tick one of the alternatives.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Dag Ingvar Jacobsen (UiA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p4k1poladm
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1poladm_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Promote the alternative which the professional expertise believes is the best in
a professional sense. |
493 |
43.7% |
0.43744454 |
| 3 |
Discuss the case with the political leadership to see if it is possible to
approve the case if minor changes are made. |
603 |
53.5% |
0.53504880 |
| 4 |
Promote the alternative that is most likely to be politically adopted. |
7 |
0.6% |
0.00621118 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
2.1% |
0.02129547 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1ansvar1_1.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ansvar1_ran1;p4k1ansvar1_ran1;r19k1ansvar1_ran1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1ansvar1_1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1114] [Invalid:1165]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[BLANK] |
534 |
47.9% |
0.4793537 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school results are very important for many people,
and they have been shown to play a significant role regarding which political
party people vote for. |
580 |
52.1% |
0.5206463 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1165 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar1_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1ansvar1_1.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ansvar1_ran2;p4k1ansvar1_ran2;r19k1ansvar1_ran2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1ansvar1_1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1114] [Invalid:1165]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
better |
548 |
49.2% |
0.491921 |
| 2 |
worse |
566 |
50.8% |
0.508079 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1165 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality:
Committed headteachers/school staff
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report
detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include
graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest
level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new
municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower
secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in
comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important
indicators.
In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the
primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Committed headteachers and school staff.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select all the alternatives that apply.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p4k1ansvar1_1;r19k1ansvar1_1;j1k1ansvar1_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1ansvar1_ran1 and f1k1ansvar1_ran2. Asked on the same page
as f1k1ansvar2 and f1k1ansvar3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
207 |
18.4% |
0.18367347 |
| 1 |
Selected |
884 |
78.4% |
0.78438332 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
3.2% |
0.03194321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality:
Parents who take responsibility
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report
detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include
graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest
level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new
municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower
secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in
comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important
indicators.
In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the
primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Parents who take responsibility for their children’s education.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select all the alternatives that apply.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p4k1ansvar1_2;r19k1ansvar1_2;j1k1ansvar1_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar2 and f1k1ansvar3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
466 |
41.3% |
0.41348713 |
| 1 |
Selected |
625 |
55.5% |
0.55456965 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
3.2% |
0.03194321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality:
Commitment among the parties in power/the mayor’s political party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report
detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include
graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest
level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new
municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower
secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran]] than in
comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important
indicators.
In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the
primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Commitment to educational policy among the parties in power / the
mayor’s political party.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select all the alternatives that apply.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p4k1ansvar1_3;r19k1ansvar1_3;j1k1ansvar1_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar2 and f1k1ansvar3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
699 |
62.0% |
0.62023070 |
| 1 |
Selected |
392 |
34.8% |
0.34782609 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
3.2% |
0.03194321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality:
Commitment among the opposition
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report
detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include
graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest
level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new
municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower
secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in
comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important
indicators.
In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the
primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Commitment to educational policy among the opposition / municipal
councillors who are not members of the mayor’s political party.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select all the alternatives that apply.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p4k1ansvar1_4;r19k1ansvar1_4;j1k1ansvar1_4
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar2 and f1k1ansvar3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
895 |
79.4% |
0.79414374 |
| 1 |
Selected |
196 |
17.4% |
0.17391304 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
3.2% |
0.03194321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality:
Policies and funding from the County Authority/Government
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report
detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include
graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest
level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new
municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower
secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in
comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important
indicators.
In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the
primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Policies and funding from the County Authority/Government.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select all the alternatives that apply.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p4k1ansvar1_5;r19k1ansvar1_5;j1k1ansvar1_5
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar2 and f1k1ansvar3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
645 |
57.2% |
0.57231588 |
| 1 |
Selected |
446 |
39.6% |
0.39574091 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
3.2% |
0.03194321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Most responsible for school results in your municipality: Headteachers
and school staff
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you
think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school
results in your municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Headteachers and school staff
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most
important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click
on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click
on them again to remove the ticks.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ansvar2_1;p4k1ansvar2_1;r19k1ansvar2_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
601 |
53.3% |
0.5332742 |
| 2 |
2 |
267 |
23.7% |
0.2369122 |
| 3 |
3 |
116 |
10.3% |
0.1029281 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
143 |
12.7% |
0.1268855 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Most responsible for school results in your municipality: Public sector
employees/municipal administration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you
think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school
results in your municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Public sector employees / municipal administration
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most
important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click
on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click
on them again to remove the ticks.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ansvar2_2;p4k1ansvar2_2;r19k1ansvar2_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
48 |
4.3% |
0.04259095 |
| 2 |
2 |
138 |
12.2% |
0.12244898 |
| 3 |
3 |
224 |
19.9% |
0.19875776 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
717 |
63.6% |
0.63620231 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Most responsible for school results in your municipality: Parents
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you
think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school
results in your municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Parents
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most
important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click
on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click
on them again to remove the ticks.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ansvar2_3;p4k1ansvar2_3;r19k1ansvar2_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
144 |
12.8% |
0.1277728 |
| 2 |
2 |
344 |
30.5% |
0.3052351 |
| 3 |
3 |
175 |
15.5% |
0.1552795 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
464 |
41.2% |
0.4117125 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Most responsible for school results in your municipality: The parties in
power/The mayor’s political party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you
think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school
results in your municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The parties in power/ The mayor’s political party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most
important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click
on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click
on them again to remove the ticks.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ansvar2_4;p4k1ansvar2_4;r19k1ansvar2_4
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
92 |
8.2% |
0.08163265 |
| 2 |
2 |
162 |
14.4% |
0.14374445 |
| 3 |
3 |
195 |
17.3% |
0.17302573 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
678 |
60.2% |
0.60159716 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Most responsible for school results in your municipality: The
opposition/Municipal councillors who are not members of the mayor’s
political party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you
think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school
results in your municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The opposition / Municipal councillors who are not members of the
mayor’s political party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most
important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click
on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click
on them again to remove the ticks.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ansvar2_5;p4k1ansvar2_5;r19k1ansvar2_5
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002661934 |
| 2 |
2 |
23 |
2.0% |
0.020408163 |
| 3 |
3 |
40 |
3.5% |
0.035492458 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1061 |
94.1% |
0.941437445 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Most responsible for school results in your municipality: The county
authority/ National government
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you
think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school
results in your municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The county authority/ National government
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most
important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click
on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click
on them again to remove the ticks.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ansvar2_6;p4k1ansvar2_6;r19k1ansvar2_6
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
163 |
14.5% |
0.14463177 |
| 2 |
2 |
97 |
8.6% |
0.08606921 |
| 3 |
3 |
242 |
21.5% |
0.21472937 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
625 |
55.5% |
0.55456965 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ansvar3
|
Variable label:
|
Whether new results for schools would have affected the voter turnout
for the mayor’s political party
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think these new results for primary and lower secondary schools
in your municipality would have affected the voter turnout for the
mayor’s political party at the next local election?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ansvar3;p4k1ansvar3;r19k1ansvar3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Asked on the same page as f1k1ansvar1 and f1k1ansvar2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly unlikely |
44 |
3.9% |
0.03904170 |
| 2 |
Quite unlikely |
115 |
10.2% |
0.10204082 |
| 3 |
Unlikely |
167 |
14.8% |
0.14818101 |
| 4 |
Neutral |
323 |
28.7% |
0.28660160 |
| 5 |
Likely |
323 |
28.7% |
0.28660160 |
| 6 |
Quite likely |
81 |
7.2% |
0.07187223 |
| 7 |
Highly likely |
7 |
0.6% |
0.00621118 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
5.9% |
0.05944987 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi1_1 and f1k1mi1_2.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi1_ran1;p4k1mi1_ran1;r19k1mi1_ran1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi1_1 and f1k1mi1_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Islamic values |
542 |
49.8% |
0.4977043 |
| 2 |
conservative notions about the position of women in Islam |
547 |
50.2% |
0.5022957 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1190 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi1_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi1_1 and f1k1mi1_2.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi1_ran2;p4k1mi1_ran2;r19k1mi1_ran2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi1_1 and f1k1mi1_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
k1mi1_1 |
516 |
47.4% |
0.4738292 |
| 2 |
k1mi1_2 |
573 |
52.6% |
0.5261708 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1190 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian Muslims be allowed to hold an event to proclaim
[Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in
Islam]?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Norwegian Muslims have asked for permission to hold a public event
in order to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the
position of women in Islam].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think they should be allowed to hold such an event?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi1_1;p4k1mi1_1;r19k1mi1_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if k1mi1_ran2 = 1 & f1group = 2]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1mi1_ran1 and f1k1mi1_ran2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
405 |
78.5% |
0.78488372 |
| 2 |
No |
104 |
20.2% |
0.20155039 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
1.4% |
0.01356589 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1763 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Does a majority/minority in Norway that muslims should be allowed to
hold an event to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about
the position of women in Islam]?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Norwegian Muslims have asked for permission to hold a public event
in order to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the
position of women in Islam]. What is your assessment:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is there a majority or a minority in Norway who thinks that they should
be allowed to hold such an event?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi1_2;p4k1mi1_2;r19k1mi1_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if k1mi1_ran2 = 2 & f1group = 2]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1mi1_ran1 and f1k1mi1_ran2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A majortiy |
276 |
48.2% |
0.48167539 |
| 2 |
A minority |
286 |
49.9% |
0.49912740 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.9% |
0.01919721 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1706 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi2_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi2_1 and f1k1mi2_2.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi2_ran1;p4k1mi2_ran1;r19k1mi2_ran1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi2_1 and f1k1mi2_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
be publicly recognised |
560 |
51.4% |
0.5142332 |
| 2 |
receive support from the state |
529 |
48.6% |
0.4857668 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1190 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi2_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi2_1 and f1k1mi2_2.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi2_ran2;p4k1mi2_ran2;r19k1mi2_ran2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi2_1 and f1k1mi2_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
k1mi2_1 |
534 |
49.0% |
0.4903581 |
| 2 |
k1mi2_2 |
555 |
51.0% |
0.5096419 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1190 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think that Muslim traditions should [be publicly
recognised/receive support from the state] in this country?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim traditions and cultures should [be publicly
recognised/receive support from the state] in this country?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi2_1;p4k1mi2_1;r19k1mi2_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if k1mi2_ran2 = 1 & f1group = 2]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1mi2_ran1 og f1k1mi2_ran2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
372 |
69.7% |
0.69662921 |
| 2 |
No |
146 |
27.3% |
0.27340824 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
3.0% |
0.02996255 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1745 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Does a majority/minority think that Muslim traditions should [be
publicly recognised/receive support from the state]in this country?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your assessment:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is there a majority or a minority in Norway who thinks that Muslim
traditions and cultures should [be publicly recognised/receive support
from the state]in this country?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi2_2;p4k1mi2_2;r19k1mi2_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if k1mi2_ran2 = 2 & f1group = 2]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1mi2_ran1 og f1k1mi2_ran2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A majortiy |
293 |
52.8% |
0.52792793 |
| 2 |
A minority |
250 |
45.0% |
0.45045045 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
2.2% |
0.02162162 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1724 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi3_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi3_1 and f1k1mi3_2.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi3_ran1;p4k1mi3_ran1;r19k1mi3_ran1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi3_1 and f1k1mi3_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Muslim local politicians |
532 |
48.9% |
0.4885216 |
| 2 |
Muslim religious leaders |
557 |
51.1% |
0.5114784 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1190 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi3_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi3_1 and f1k1mi3_2.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi3_ran2;p4k1mi3_ran2;r19k1mi3_ran2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi3_1 and f1k1mi3_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
k1mi3_1 |
568 |
52.2% |
0.5215794 |
| 2 |
k1mi3_2 |
521 |
47.8% |
0.4784206 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1190 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Trust/distrust Muslim [local politicians/religious leaders] when they
say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you trust or distrust [Muslim local politicians/Muslim religious
leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi3_1;p4k1mi3_1;r19k1mi3_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if k1mi3_ran2 = 1 & f1group = 2]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1mi3_ran1 and f1k1mi3_ran2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Trust |
445 |
78.3% |
0.78345070 |
| 2 |
Distrust |
108 |
19.0% |
0.19014085 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
2.6% |
0.02640845 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1711 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Does majority/minority trust/distrust [Muslim local politicians/Muslim
religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian
society?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your assessment:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Does the majority in Norway trust or distrust [Muslim local
politicians/Muslim religious leaders] when they say they want to be part
of Norwegian society?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi3_2;p4k1mi3_2;r19k1mi3_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if k1mi3_ran2 = 2 & f1group = 2]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1mi3_ran1 and f1k1mi3_ran2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The majority trusts |
343 |
65.8% |
0.6583493 |
| 2 |
The majority distrusts |
171 |
32.8% |
0.3282150 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
1.3% |
0.0134357 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1758 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi4_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi4_1 and f1k1mi4_2.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi4_ran1;p4k1mi4_ran1;r19k1mi4_ran1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi4_1 and f1k1mi4_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
reflect |
552 |
50.7% |
0.5068871 |
| 2 |
place less emphasis on |
537 |
49.3% |
0.4931129 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1190 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi4_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi4_1 and f1k1mi4_2.]
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi4_ran2;p4k1mi4_ran2;r19k1mi4_ran2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if f1group = 2]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
f1k1mi4_1 and f1k1mi4_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1089] [Invalid:1190]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
k1mi4_1 |
534 |
49.0% |
0.4903581 |
| 2 |
k1mi4_2 |
555 |
51.0% |
0.5096419 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1190 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Should school textbooks [reflect/place less emphasis on] the
religious/cultural diversity in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think primary and lower secondary school textbooks should be
written so that they [reflect/place less emphasis on] the religious and
cultural diversity in Norway?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi4_1;p4k1mi4_1;r19k1mi4_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if k1mi4_ran2 = 1 & f1group = 2]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1mi4_ran1 and f1k1mi4_ran2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
289 |
54.1% |
0.54119850 |
| 2 |
No |
236 |
44.2% |
0.44194757 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.7% |
0.01685393 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1745 |
|
NA |
f1k1mi4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Does a majority/minority think that school textbooks should
[reflect/place less emphasis on] religious/cultural diversity?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your assessment:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is there a majority or a minority in Norway who thinks that primary and
lower secondary school textbooks should be written so that they
[reflect/place less emphasis on] the religious and cultural diversity in
Norway?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1mi4_2;p4k1mi4_2;r19k1mi4_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if k1mi4_ran2 = 2 & f1group = 2]
[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned
values in f1k1mi4_ran1 and f1k1mi4_ran2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A majortiy |
293 |
52.8% |
0.52792793 |
| 2 |
A minority |
251 |
45.2% |
0.45225225 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
2.0% |
0.01981982 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1724 |
|
NA |
f1k1imcp_1
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Important for me to be unprejudiced towards
immigrants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced towards immigrants.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1imcp_1;p4k1imcp_1;r19k1imcp_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
411 |
36.5% |
0.364685004 |
| 2 |
Good |
438 |
38.9% |
0.388642413 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
117 |
10.4% |
0.103815439 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
76 |
6.7% |
0.067435670 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
16 |
1.4% |
0.014196983 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007985803 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
4 |
0.4% |
0.003549246 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
5.0% |
0.049689441 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1imcp_2
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1imcp_2;p4k1imcp_2;r19k1imcp_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
399 |
35.4% |
0.35403727 |
| 2 |
Good |
366 |
32.5% |
0.32475599 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
117 |
10.4% |
0.10381544 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
120 |
10.6% |
0.10647737 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
28 |
2.5% |
0.02484472 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
17 |
1.5% |
0.01508429 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01419698 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
5.7% |
0.05678793 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1imcp_3
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Feel guilty if I think negatively about
immigrants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1imcp_3;p4k1imcp_3;r19k1imcp_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
101 |
9.0% |
0.08961846 |
| 2 |
Good |
221 |
19.6% |
0.19609583 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
174 |
15.4% |
0.15439219 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
284 |
25.2% |
0.25199645 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
97 |
8.6% |
0.08606921 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
124 |
11.0% |
0.11002662 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
65 |
5.8% |
0.05767524 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
61 |
5.4% |
0.05412600 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1imcp_4
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants
because of own convictions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of my own
convictions.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1imcp_4;p4k1imcp_4;r19k1imcp_4
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
360 |
31.9% |
0.319432121 |
| 2 |
Good |
455 |
40.4% |
0.403726708 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
117 |
10.4% |
0.103815439 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
105 |
9.3% |
0.093167702 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
11 |
1.0% |
0.009760426 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
12 |
1.1% |
0.010647737 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
8 |
0.7% |
0.007098492 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
5.2% |
0.052351375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1miljo1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: People have the right to change the natural environment so
that it satisfies their needs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We
would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People have the right to change the natural environment so that it
satisfies their needs
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1miljo1_1;p4k1miljo1_1;r19k1miljo1_1
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
17 |
1.5% |
0.01508429 |
| 2 |
Agree |
73 |
6.5% |
0.06477374 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
255 |
22.6% |
0.22626442 |
| 4 |
Do not agree that much |
434 |
38.5% |
0.38509317 |
| 5 |
Do not agree at all |
284 |
25.2% |
0.25199645 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
5.7% |
0.05678793 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1miljo1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: We must take environmental considerations into account, even
if it reduces economic growth
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We
would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We must take environmental considerations into account, even if it
reduces economic growth
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1miljo1_2;p4k1miljo1_2;r19k1miljo1_2
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
484 |
42.9% |
0.429458740 |
| 2 |
Agree |
397 |
35.2% |
0.352262644 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
151 |
13.4% |
0.133984028 |
| 4 |
Do not agree that much |
30 |
2.7% |
0.026619343 |
| 5 |
Do not agree at all |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005323869 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
5.2% |
0.052351375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1miljo1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norwegian environmental policy needs the same kind of urgent
response as shown in the coronavirus crisis
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We
would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian environmental policy needs to see the same kind of urgent
response that was shown in relation to the coronavirus crisis
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1miljo1_3;p4k1miljo1_3;r19k1miljo1_3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
331 |
29.4% |
0.29370009 |
| 2 |
Agree |
346 |
30.7% |
0.30700976 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
246 |
21.8% |
0.21827862 |
| 4 |
Do not agree that much |
96 |
8.5% |
0.08518190 |
| 5 |
Do not agree at all |
47 |
4.2% |
0.04170364 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
61 |
5.4% |
0.05412600 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1miljo1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Technological innovations will solve climate problems
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We
would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will solve climate problems
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1miljo1_4;p4k1miljo1_4;r19k1miljo1_4
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
80 |
7.1% |
0.07098492 |
| 2 |
Agree |
238 |
21.1% |
0.21118012 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
576 |
51.1% |
0.51109139 |
| 4 |
Do not agree that much |
136 |
12.1% |
0.12067436 |
| 5 |
Do not agree at all |
37 |
3.3% |
0.03283052 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
5.3% |
0.05323869 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1ulikhet3
|
Variable label:
|
The main reason why some people are poor in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
The main reason why some people are poor in Norway is…
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please select the reason that you think is most important.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1ulikhet3;p4k1ulikhet3;r19k1ulikhet3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if f1group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
... that some of them are generally lazy and work-shy |
37 |
3.3% |
0.03283052 |
| 2 |
... that some of them are unfortunate |
184 |
16.3% |
0.16326531 |
| 3 |
... that some of them come from an underprivileged family |
541 |
48.0% |
0.48003549 |
| 4 |
... that some of them are underpaid |
214 |
19.0% |
0.18988465 |
| 5 |
... that some of them lack innate abilities that are important in working life |
79 |
7.0% |
0.07009760 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
6.4% |
0.06388642 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1152 |
|
NA |
f1k1kj3
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1kj3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2279]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or
lower secondary school) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 3 |
Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School, business college) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 4 |
Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2,
VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 5 |
Craft training/shorter education programmes (e.g. vocational school, technical
school/college, maritime vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot
training, secretary school, home industry school/handicrafts school, master
craftsman certificate training) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university
college graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 7 |
College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime
subjects, military subjects etc.) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 8 |
University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 9 |
University college – 5-6 year education (MA, majors or longer vocational
education on a university college level) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered
engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
|
NaN |
| Sysmiss |
|
2279 |
|
NA |
f1k1kj3_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
None of the above (please enter):
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1kj3_12_other
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:2279] [Range:-]
|
f1k1kj3_recode
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education? [recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1kj3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations]
[Recoded from source variable: f1k1kj3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002632734 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
119 |
5.2% |
0.052215884 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
2012 |
88.3% |
0.882843352 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
142 |
6.2% |
0.062308030 |
f1k1kj3_recode_coded
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education? [recoded] [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1kj3
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations]
[Recoded from source variable: f1k1kj3]
[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source
variable f1k1kj3_recode]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002632734 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
119 |
5.2% |
0.052215884 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
2020 |
88.6% |
0.886353664 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
134 |
5.9% |
0.058797718 |
f1k1kj5
|
Variable label:
|
Placement political left-right scale
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People often talk about right-wing economics and left-wing economics.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means
left-wing in relation to economic issues and 10 means right-wing in
relation to economic issues?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1kj5;p4k1kj5
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left wing |
17 |
0.7% |
0.007459412 |
| 1 |
1 |
62 |
2.7% |
0.027204914 |
| 2 |
2 |
244 |
10.7% |
0.107064502 |
| 3 |
3 |
425 |
18.6% |
0.186485301 |
| 4 |
4 |
403 |
17.7% |
0.176831944 |
| 5 |
5 |
372 |
16.3% |
0.163229487 |
| 6 |
6 |
256 |
11.2% |
0.112329969 |
| 7 |
7 |
215 |
9.4% |
0.094339623 |
| 8 |
8 |
83 |
3.6% |
0.036419482 |
| 9 |
9 |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007898201 |
| 10 |
10 Right wing |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004826678 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
173 |
7.6% |
0.075910487 |
f1k1kj6
|
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1kj6
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
23 |
1.0% |
0.01009215 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
393 |
17.2% |
0.17244405 |
| 3 |
The Progressive Party |
31 |
1.4% |
0.01360246 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
156 |
6.8% |
0.06845108 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
266 |
11.7% |
0.11671786 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
129 |
5.7% |
0.05660377 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
274 |
12.0% |
0.12022817 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
573 |
25.1% |
0.25142606 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
68 |
3.0% |
0.02983765 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
42 |
1.8% |
0.01842914 |
| 11 |
Not entitled to vote |
34 |
1.5% |
0.01491882 |
| 12 |
Other: |
94 |
4.1% |
0.04124616 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
196 |
8.6% |
0.08600263 |
f1k1kj6_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary
election tomorrow?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1kj6_12_other
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:2279] [Range:-]
|
f1k1kj6_coded
|
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
j1k1kj6
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert]
[New variable that also includes coded other statements from source
variable f1k1kj6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
23 |
1.0% |
0.01009215 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
394 |
17.3% |
0.17288284 |
| 3 |
The Progressive Party |
31 |
1.4% |
0.01360246 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
156 |
6.8% |
0.06845108 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
266 |
11.7% |
0.11671786 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
130 |
5.7% |
0.05704256 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
274 |
12.0% |
0.12022817 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
573 |
25.1% |
0.25142606 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
68 |
3.0% |
0.02983765 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
42 |
1.8% |
0.01842914 |
| 11 |
Not entitled to vote |
34 |
1.5% |
0.01491882 |
| 12 |
Other: |
92 |
4.0% |
0.04036858 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
196 |
8.6% |
0.08600263 |
f1avslutt
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Feedback about the survey
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you wish to provide feedback about the survey?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If so, write below.
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2279]
[Range:-]
|
f1P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1063 |
46.6% |
0.46643265 |
| 2 |
Female |
1175 |
51.6% |
0.51557701 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
1.8% |
0.01799035 |
f1P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
857 |
37.6% |
0.37604212 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
644 |
28.3% |
0.28258008 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
44 |
1.9% |
0.01930671 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
153 |
6.7% |
0.06713471 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
55 |
2.4% |
0.02413339 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
64 |
2.8% |
0.02808249 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
462 |
20.3% |
0.20272049 |
f1P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:3-54]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
857 |
37.6% |
0.376042124 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
54 |
2.4% |
0.023694603 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002632734 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
19 |
0.8% |
0.008336990 |
| 30 |
Viken |
510 |
22.4% |
0.223782361 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
32 |
1.4% |
0.014041246 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
102 |
4.5% |
0.044756472 |
| 42 |
Agder |
44 |
1.9% |
0.019306713 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
93 |
4.1% |
0.040807372 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
55 |
2.4% |
0.024133392 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
45 |
2.0% |
0.019745502 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
462 |
20.3% |
0.202720491 |
f1P3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Election district
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus |
420 |
18.4% |
0.184291356 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
857 |
37.6% |
0.376042124 |
| 3 |
Østfold |
55 |
2.4% |
0.024133392 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
96 |
4.2% |
0.042123738 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
19 |
0.8% |
0.008336990 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
13 |
0.6% |
0.005704256 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
35 |
1.5% |
0.015357613 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002632734 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
20 |
0.9% |
0.008775779 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
24 |
1.1% |
0.010530935 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
54 |
2.4% |
0.023694603 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
33 |
1.4% |
0.014480035 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
60 |
2.6% |
0.026327337 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002632734 |
| 15 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
9 |
0.4% |
0.003949100 |
| 16 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
46 |
2.0% |
0.020184291 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
19 |
0.8% |
0.008336990 |
| 18 |
Troms |
41 |
1.8% |
0.017990347 |
| 19 |
Finnmark |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001755156 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
462 |
20.3% |
0.202720491 |
f1P3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Region (trichotomy)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
857 |
37.6% |
0.3760421 |
| 2 |
Eastern Norway |
644 |
28.3% |
0.2825801 |
| 3 |
The rest of the country |
316 |
13.9% |
0.1386573 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
462 |
20.3% |
0.2027205 |
f1P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education (condensed)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source variable: f1k1kj3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002632734 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
119 |
5.2% |
0.052215884 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
2012 |
88.3% |
0.882843352 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
142 |
6.2% |
0.062308030 |
f1P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (expanded)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
339 |
14.9% |
0.14874945 |
| 2 |
1960-1969 |
715 |
31.4% |
0.31373409 |
| 3 |
1970-1979 |
608 |
26.7% |
0.26678368 |
| 4 |
1980-1989 |
328 |
14.4% |
0.14392277 |
| 5 |
1990 or later |
141 |
6.2% |
0.06186924 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
148 |
6.5% |
0.06494076 |
f1P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (condensed)
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
339 |
14.9% |
0.14874945 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
1651 |
72.4% |
0.72444054 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
141 |
6.2% |
0.06186924 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
148 |
6.5% |
0.06494076 |
f1P6
|
Variable label:
|
Administrative level
|
|
Field period:
|
02.11.2020 - 08.04.2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ministry |
1032 |
45.3% |
0.452830189 |
| 2 |
Directorate |
1237 |
54.3% |
0.542781922 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004387889 |
f1_tvcpa
|
Variable label:
|
Currently a public administrator in the central government
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain respondents were after the field period and data delivery
discovered as not fitting into the defined target population. That is,
not working in public administration in the central government
(ministries, directorates, and supervisory authorities). We therefore
recommend excluding these respondents when conducting analyses. For more
information on the exclusion process and -criteria, please refer to the
documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2279] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not currently a public administrator in the central government |
24 |
1.1% |
0.01053093 |
| 1 |
Currently a public administrator in the central government |
2255 |
98.9% |
0.98946907 |
