Codebook

The Panel of Journalists

KODEM

Round 1

v-100 - 2021-08-23









Produced by ideas2evidence










Citation

Scientific committee for KODEM

Name Affiliaton
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten UiB
Anne Lise Fimreite UiB
Rune Karlsen UiO
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø NORCE
Johannes Bergh ISF
Jarle Trondal UiA

Responsible for KODEM-panels

Panel Name
NMP Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
NRP Yvette Peters
NJP Erik Knudsen
NFP Jarle Trondal, Tobias Bach, Jacob Aars

Coordinating team

Name
Erla Løvseth
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
Soran Hajo Dahl

Producers

Name Affiliation Role
Øivind Skjervheim ideas2evidence Coordinator
Olav Bjørnebekk ideas2evidence Project team member
Amund Eikrem ideas2evidence Project team member
Joachim Wettergreen ideas2evidence Project team member
Asle Høgestøl ideas2evidence Quality assurance

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Panel of Journalists (NJP) is an internet-based survey of journalists and editors in Norway. The media has a unique power to influence public opinion and provides an important area for debate. By following journalists and editors over time, the panel will collect valuable information about how they work, prioritize, and understand important topics. The panel is initiated and run by researchers from the leading reseach universities and institutions in Norway and is a non-profit project that aims to serve reseach goals.

Some of the questions in this survey are part of a coordinated system of surveys (“KODEM”) which also gathers information about beliefs and convictions of citizens (uib.no/medborger), elected representatives (uib.no/representant), and public administrators (uib.no/NFP). This mode of data collection enables innovative research of groups that together comprise the political body in Norway.

The Norwegian Panel of Journalists is part of the Digital Social Science Core Facility (DIGSSCORE) at the University of Bergen (UiB). The Norwegian Panel of Journalists is also affiliated with the Norwegian citizen Panel, the The Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators, and the Panel of Elected Representatives. The University of Bergen is the owner and treatment manager of the The Norwegian Panel of Journalists. Ideas2Evidence executes the practical implementation of the survey, and are responsible for recruting participants, as well as sending and receiving surveys to and from respondents. The data is stored encrypted and secure in UiB's infrastructure for for safe processing of sensitive personal data in research, ‘SAFE’. The panel has been reported to and processed by the Data Protection Official for Research at the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD) pursuant to the Personal Data Act. More information can be found at uib.no/NFP.

Scope

Geographic coverage: National.
Unit of analysis: Journalists and editors.
Universe: All journalists and editors in Norway.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

All journalists and editors in Norwegian media institutions are invited to participate in The Norwegian Panel of Journalists. Contact information has been collected through bylines and newspaper registeres.

In this establishment round of the panel, a minority of respondents were also recuited through “active enrollment”, whereby respondents clicked a link distributed to the relevant unions, association, etc. More on this in the section on data collection below.

Mode of Data Collection

Recruitment and data collection were carried out using three separate online questionnaires with somewhat differing target audience and recuitment strategy:

The surveys were practically indentical in terms of content. The reason for this approach stems from a change in recuitment strategy with the aim of 1) reaching a broader group of relevant respondents and 2) increase the response rate by employing a more targeted recruitment method (personal email). The majority of respondents were recruited via survey 3.

The field period for the various surveys in round 1 were carried out in the following period of time:

For a more detailed description on recruitment of panel members, please see the documentation report.


Change Log

No changes registred.



Dataset contents

File name The Panel of Journalists - round 1k1 - v-100-L.sav
Distribution type Privileged
# Cases 760
# Variables 169


Variable Documentation

responseid


Variable label: responseid
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



j1group


Variable label: [Randomized sub-group]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Randomized for all respondents]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group 1 380 50% 0.5
2 Group 2 380 50% 0.5


j1interview_start


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



j1interview_end


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:647] [Invalid:113] [Range:-]



j1browsertype


Variable label: [Browertype used by respondent]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Browertype used by respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



j1browserversion


Variable label: [Browser version used by respondent]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Browser version used by respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



j1mobil


Variable label: [Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Determines if the respondents uses mobile]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Mobile 190 25% 0.25
0 Other 570 75% 0.75


j1opplosning


Variable label: [Screen resolution of the applied device]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Screen resolution of the applied device]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



j1enhetstype


Variable label: [Determines respondents device type]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Determines respondents device type]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 PC 582 76.6% 0.765789474
2 Touch 176 23.2% 0.231578947
3 Generic 2 0.3% 0.002631579


j1advancedwifeaturesenabled


Variable label: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



j1getrenderingmode


Variable label: [Detects the browsers rendering mode]
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Detects the browsers rendering mode]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



j1k1kj101_1


Variable label: Union membership: The Norwegian Union of Journalists
Pre-question text: Everyone who participates on the Norwegian Panel of Journalists is recruited from the Norwegian Union of Journalists or the Association of Norwegian Editors. Which of these organisations are you a member of? / Are you currently…
Literal question: The Norwegian Union of Journalists
Post-question: If you are a member of both the Norwegian Union of Journalists and the Association of Norwegian Editors, you may choose both alternatives.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 20.01.2021
Technical description: [Respondents that did not receive the j1k1kj101_ed2 variant of the question were asked. Respondents that received the survey directed towards members of The Norwegian Union of Journalists or The Association of Norwegian Editors were asked about their membership. The remaining respondents, who received the survey directed towards The Association of Norwegian local newspapers, were asked to choose either “journalist” or “editor”, in addtion to the choice of “other”]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 20 47.6% 0.4761905
1 Selected 22 52.4% 0.5238095
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000
98 Not asked 718 NA


j1k1kj101_2


Variable label: Union membership: The Association of Norwegian Editors
Pre-question text: Everyone who participates on the Norwegian Panel of Journalists is recruited from the Norwegian Union of Journalists or the Association of Norwegian Editors. Which of these organisations are you a member of? / Are you currently…
Literal question: The Association of Norwegian Editors
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 20.01.2021
Technical description: [Respondents that did not receive the j1k1kj101_ed2 variant of the question were asked. Respondents that received the survey directed towards members of The Norwegian Union of Journalists or The Association of Norwegian Editors were asked about their membership. The remaining respondents, who received the survey directed towards The Association of Norwegian local newspapers, were asked to choose either “journalist” or “editor”, in addtion to the choice of “other”]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 20 47.6% 0.4761905
1 Selected 22 52.4% 0.5238095
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000
98 Not asked 718 NA


j1k1kj101_3


Variable label: Union membership: Other
Pre-question text: Everyone who participates on the Norwegian Panel of Journalists is recruited from the Norwegian Union of Journalists or the Association of Norwegian Editors. Which of these organisations are you a member of? / Are you currently…
Literal question: Other:
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 20.01.2021
Technical description: [Respondents that did not receive the j1k1kj101_ed2 variant of the question were asked. Respondents that received the survey directed towards members of The Norwegian Union of Journalists or The Association of Norwegian Editors were asked about their membership. The remaining respondents, who received the survey directed towards The Association of Norwegian local newspapers, were asked to choose either “journalist” or “editor”, in addtion to the choice of “other”]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-0]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 0 0% 0
0 Not selected 6 100% 1
97 Not answered 0 0% 0
98 Not asked 754 NA


j1k1kj101_3_other


Variable label: Union membership: Other
Pre-question text: Everyone who participates on the Norwegian Panel of Journalists is recruited from the Norwegian Union of Journalists or the Association of Norwegian Editors. Which of these organisations are you a member of? / Are you currently…
Literal question: Other:
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 20.01.2021
Technical description:

[Respondents that did not receive the j1k1kj101_ed2 variant of the question were asked. Respondents that received the survey directed towards members of The Norwegian Union of Journalists or The Association of Norwegian Editors were asked about their membership. The remaining respondents, who received the survey directed towards The Association of Norwegian local newspapers, were asked to choose either “journalist” or “editor”, in addtion to the choice of “other”]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:760] [Range:-]



j1k1kj101_ed2


Variable label: Which of the following descriptions best describes your currect employment status?
Literal question: Which of the following descriptions best describes your currect employment status?
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Respondents that did not receive the j1k1kj101 variant of the question were asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I have no editorial resposibilty at all 431 60% 0.60027855
2 I have some editorial resposibilty 168 23.4% 0.23398329
3 I have a lot of editorial resposibilty 47 6.5% 0.06545961
4 I have a high degree of editorial resposibilty 42 5.8% 0.05849582
5 Other: 11 1.5% 0.01532033
97 Not answered 19 2.6% 0.02646240
98 Not asked 42 NA


j1k1kj101_ed2_5_other


Variable label: Open: Which of the following descriptions best describes your currect employment status?
Pre-question text: Which of the following descriptions best describes your currect employment status?
Literal question: Other:
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Respondents that did not receive the j1k1kj101 variant of the question were asked]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:760] [Range:-]



j1k1kj102


Variable label: The primary geographical orientation of the medium you are currently working for
Literal question: What is the primary geographical orientation of the medium you are currently working for?
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Local (newspaper/radio/TV or other media) 182 23.9% 0.239473684
2 Regional (newspaper/radio/TV or other media) 161 21.2% 0.211842105
3 National (newspaper/radio/TV or other media) 412 54.2% 0.542105263
97 Not answered 5 0.7% 0.006578947


j1k1kj103_1


Variable label: Fields you work in, a normal day: Cultural journalism
Pre-question text: During the course of a normal day, in which of the following fields do you work?
Literal question: Cultural journalism
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 494 65% 0.65
1 Selected 266 35% 0.35
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00


j1k1kj103_2


Variable label: Fields you work in, a normal day: Political journalism
Pre-question text: During the course of a normal day, in which of the following fields do you work?
Literal question: Political journalism
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 402 52.9% 0.5289474
1 Selected 358 47.1% 0.4710526
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000


j1k1kj103_3


Variable label: Fields you work in, a normal day: Opinion and commentary journalism
Pre-question text: During the course of a normal day, in which of the following fields do you work?
Literal question: Opinion and commentary journalism
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 577 75.9% 0.7592105
1 Selected 183 24.1% 0.2407895
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000


j1k1kj103_4


Variable label: Fields you work in, a normal day: Financial journalism
Pre-question text: During the course of a normal day, in which of the following fields do you work?
Literal question: Financial journalism
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 549 72.2% 0.7223684
1 Selected 211 27.8% 0.2776316
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000


j1k1kj103_5


Variable label: Fields you work in, a normal day: Entertainment
Pre-question text: During the course of a normal day, in which of the following fields do you work?
Literal question: Entertainment
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 567 74.6% 0.7460526
1 Selected 193 25.4% 0.2539474
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000


j1k1kj103_6


Variable label: Fields you work in, a normal day: Sport
Pre-question text: During the course of a normal day, in which of the following fields do you work?
Literal question: Sport
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 632 83.2% 0.8315789
1 Selected 128 16.8% 0.1684211
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000


j1k1kj103_7


Variable label: Fields you work in, a normal day: News journalism
Pre-question text: During the course of a normal day, in which of the following fields do you work?
Literal question: News journalism
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 261 34.3% 0.3434211
1 Selected 499 65.7% 0.6565789
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000


j1k1kj103_8


Variable label: Fields you work in, a normal day: Domestic news
Pre-question text: During the course of a normal day, in which of the following fields do you work?
Literal question: Domestic news
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 493 64.9% 0.6486842
1 Selected 267 35.1% 0.3513158
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000


j1k1kj103_9


Variable label: Fields you work in, a normal day: International news
Pre-question text: During the course of a normal day, in which of the following fields do you work?
Literal question: International news
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 627 82.5% 0.825
1 Selected 133 17.5% 0.175
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.000


j1k1kj103_10


Variable label: Fields you work in, a normal day: Other
Pre-question text: During the course of a normal day, in which of the following fields do you work?
Literal question: Other
Post-question: You may choose more than one alternative.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 597 78.6% 0.7855263
1 Selected 163 21.4% 0.2144737
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000


j1k1kj104


Variable label: During the course of a normal day, in field do you work most?
Literal question: During the course of a normal day, in which of the following fields do you work most?
Post-question: Choose only one alternative.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Cultural journalism 42 5.5% 0.055263158
2 Political journalism 48 6.3% 0.063157895
3 Opinion and commentary journalism 57 7.5% 0.075000000
4 Financial journalism 38 5% 0.050000000
5 Entertainment 41 5.4% 0.053947368
6 Sports 21 2.8% 0.027631579
7 News journalism 318 41.8% 0.418421053
8 Domestic news 55 7.2% 0.072368421
9 International news 22 2.9% 0.028947368
10 Other 115 15.1% 0.151315789
97 Not answered 3 0.4% 0.003947368


j1k1kj105_1


Variable label: Number of years employed at current position
Pre-question text: How many years have you worked in your current…
Literal question: …position?
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Less than 1 year 102 13.4% 0.13421053
2 1 - 5 years 289 38% 0.38026316
3 6 – 10 years 110 14.5% 0.14473684
4 11 – 20 years 120 15.8% 0.15789474
5 More than 20 years 126 16.6% 0.16578947
97 Not answered 13 1.7% 0.01710526


j1k1kj105_2


Variable label: Number of years employed in current organization
Pre-question text: How many years have you worked in your current…
Literal question: …organisation?
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Less than 1 year 48 6.3% 0.06315789
2 1 - 5 years 201 26.4% 0.26447368
3 6 – 10 years 90 11.8% 0.11842105
4 11 – 20 years 153 20.1% 0.20131579
5 More than 20 years 189 24.9% 0.24868421
97 Not answered 79 10.4% 0.10394737


j1k1selvstyre1_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Respondents are randomly assigned into four groups. Tre experiment groups and one control group.]
Equivalent in others panels: r19k1selvstyre1_ran1;f1k1selvstyre1_ran1;p4k1selvstyre1_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 1]

[Experiment. Respondents are randomly assigned into four groups. Tre experiment groups and one control group.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:380] [Invalid:380] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A 94 24.7% 0.2473684
2 B 88 23.2% 0.2315789
3 C 100 26.3% 0.2631579
4 D 98 25.8% 0.2578947
Sysmiss 380 NA


j1k1selvstyre1a_1


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: Whether schools must close during a pandemic
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1a_1;p4k1selvstyre1a_1;r19k1selvstyre1a_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 5 5.3% 0.05319149
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 34 36.2% 0.36170213
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 34 36.2% 0.36170213
4 Mostly up to the state 14 14.9% 0.14893617
5 Totally up to the state 7 7.4% 0.07446809
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 666 NA


j1k1selvstyre1a_2


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: On the development of wind power in municipalities
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1a_2;p4k1selvstyre1a_2;r19k1selvstyre1a_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 10 10.6% 0.10638298
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 28 29.8% 0.29787234
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 33 35.1% 0.35106383
4 Mostly up to the state 18 19.1% 0.19148936
5 Totally up to the state 5 5.3% 0.05319149
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 666 NA


j1k1selvstyre1a_3


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the shoreline building can take place
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1a_3;p4k1selvstyre1a_3;r19k1selvstyre1a_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 6 6.4% 0.06382979
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 18 19.1% 0.19148936
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 20 21.3% 0.21276596
4 Mostly up to the state 36 38.3% 0.38297872
5 Totally up to the state 14 14.9% 0.14893617
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 666 NA


j1k1selvstyre1a_4


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How large primary school classes should be
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how large primary school classes should be?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1a_4;p4k1selvstyre1a_4;r19k1selvstyre1a_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 8 8.5% 0.08510638
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 28 29.8% 0.29787234
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 20 21.3% 0.21276596
4 Mostly up to the state 29 30.9% 0.30851064
5 Totally up to the state 9 9.6% 0.09574468
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 666 NA


j1k1selvstyre1b_primer


Variable label: Should it be up to the municipalities or the state to decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
Pre-question text: Imagine that there is a severe pandemic outbreak in Norway. Infection control experts disagree on whether closing schools will slow the pandemic.
Literal question: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide whether schools must be closed during a pandemic?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1b_primer;p4k1selvstyre1b_primer;r19k1selvstyre1b_primer
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 2 2.3% 0.02272727
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 30 34.1% 0.34090909
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 21 23.9% 0.23863636
4 Mostly up to the state 33 37.5% 0.37500000
5 Totally up to the state 2 2.3% 0.02272727
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 672 NA


j1k1selvstyre1b_1


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: On the development of wind power in municipalities
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1b_1;p4k1selvstyre1b_1;r19k1selvstyre1b_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 12 13.6% 0.13636364
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 30 34.1% 0.34090909
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 27 30.7% 0.30681818
4 Mostly up to the state 16 18.2% 0.18181818
5 Totally up to the state 2 2.3% 0.02272727
97 Not answered 1 1.1% 0.01136364
98 Not asked 672 NA


j1k1selvstyre1b_2


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the shoreline building can take place
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1b_2;p4k1selvstyre1b_2;r19k1selvstyre1b_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 9 10.2% 0.10227273
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 24 27.3% 0.27272727
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 17 19.3% 0.19318182
4 Mostly up to the state 28 31.8% 0.31818182
5 Totally up to the state 9 10.2% 0.10227273
97 Not answered 1 1.1% 0.01136364
98 Not asked 672 NA


j1k1selvstyre1b_3


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How large primary school classes should be
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how large primary school classes should be?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1b_3;p4k1selvstyre1b_3;r19k1selvstyre1b_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 13 14.8% 0.14772727
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 22 25% 0.25000000
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 20 22.7% 0.22727273
4 Mostly up to the state 28 31.8% 0.31818182
5 Totally up to the state 4 4.5% 0.04545455
97 Not answered 1 1.1% 0.01136364
98 Not asked 672 NA


j1k1selvstyre1c_primer


Variable label: Should it be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide on the size of primary school classes?
Pre-question text: Imagine that the issue regarding the size of primary school classes is to be decided. The pedagogical community does not agree on which class size is best regarding the learning and well-being of pupils.
Literal question: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide on the size of primary school classes?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1c_primer;p4k1selvstyre1c_primer;r19k1selvstyre1c_primer
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 10 10% 0.10
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 35 35% 0.35
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 16 16% 0.16
4 Mostly up to the state 29 29% 0.29
5 Totally up to the state 9 9% 0.09
97 Not answered 1 1% 0.01
98 Not asked 660 NA


j1k1selvstyre1c_1


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: On the development of wind power in municipalities
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1c_1;p4k1selvstyre1c_1;r19k1selvstyre1c_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 15 15% 0.15
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 32 32% 0.32
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 28 28% 0.28
4 Mostly up to the state 20 20% 0.20
5 Totally up to the state 4 4% 0.04
97 Not answered 1 1% 0.01
98 Not asked 660 NA


j1k1selvstyre1c_2


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the shoreline building can take place
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1c_2;p4k1selvstyre1c_2;r19k1selvstyre1c_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 13 13% 0.13
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 17 17% 0.17
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 20 20% 0.20
4 Mostly up to the state 27 27% 0.27
5 Totally up to the state 22 22% 0.22
97 Not answered 1 1% 0.01
98 Not asked 660 NA


j1k1selvstyre1c_3


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the get state to decide: Whether schools must close during a pandemic
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1c_3;p4k1selvstyre1c_3;r19k1selvstyre1c_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 12 12% 0.12
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 37 37% 0.37
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 23 23% 0.23
4 Mostly up to the state 20 20% 0.20
5 Totally up to the state 7 7% 0.07
97 Not answered 1 1% 0.01
98 Not asked 660 NA


j1k1selvstyre1d_primer


Variable label: Should it be up to the municipalities or to the state to decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Pre-question text: Imagine that a committee proposes significant wind power development in Norway. Environmental management experts disagree on whether the value of climate-friendly energy can justify the damage to nature that will result from the development.
Literal question: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1d_primer;p4k1selvstyre1d_primer;r19k1selvstyre1d_primer
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 8 8.2% 0.08163265
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 34 34.7% 0.34693878
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 24 24.5% 0.24489796
4 Mostly up to the state 27 27.6% 0.27551020
5 Totally up to the state 3 3.1% 0.03061224
97 Not answered 2 2% 0.02040816
98 Not asked 662 NA


j1k1selvstyre1d_1


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: Whether schools must close during a pandemic
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1d_1;p4k1selvstyre1d_1;r19k1selvstyre1d_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 7 7.1% 0.07142857
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 45 45.9% 0.45918367
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 26 26.5% 0.26530612
4 Mostly up to the state 13 13.3% 0.13265306
5 Totally up to the state 6 6.1% 0.06122449
97 Not answered 1 1% 0.01020408
98 Not asked 662 NA


j1k1selvstyre1d_2


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the shoreline building can take place
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1d_2;p4k1selvstyre1d_2;r19k1selvstyre1d_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 4 4.1% 0.04081633
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 23 23.5% 0.23469388
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 17 17.3% 0.17346939
4 Mostly up to the state 35 35.7% 0.35714286
5 Totally up to the state 19 19.4% 0.19387755
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 662 NA


j1k1selvstyre1d_3


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How large primary school classes should be
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how large primary school classes should be?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1d_3;p4k1selvstyre1d_3;r19k1selvstyre1d_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1 & j1k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]

[Experiment. Asked to one of the groups, dependent on the randomisation in j1k1selvstyre1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 12 12.2% 0.1224490
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 23 23.5% 0.2346939
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 19 19.4% 0.1938776
4 Mostly up to the state 31 31.6% 0.3163265
5 Totally up to the state 13 13.3% 0.1326531
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000
98 Not asked 662 NA


j1k1selvstyre2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Norwegian democracy could have worked just as well without local self-government
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement:
Literal question: Norwegian democracy could have worked just as well without local self-government.
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre2;p4k1selvstyre2;r19k1selvstyre2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 3 0.8% 0.007894737
2 Agree 1 0.3% 0.002631579
3 Somewhat agree 17 4.5% 0.044736842
4 Neither agree nor disagree 20 5.3% 0.052631579
5 Somewhat disagree 31 8.2% 0.081578947
6 Disagree 141 37.1% 0.371052632
7 Strongly disagree 164 43.2% 0.431578947
97 Not answered 3 0.8% 0.007894737
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1sm1


Variable label: Do politicians or the media primarily decide which issues are put on the agenda?
Pre-question text: In your opinion…
Literal question: do politicians or the media primarily decide which issues are put on the agenda?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1sm1;r19k1sm1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Primarily politicians 5 1.3% 0.013157895
2 Politicians, to a greater extent 19 5% 0.050000000
3 Politicians, to a somewhat greater extent 47 12.4% 0.123684211
4 The media and politicians have equal influence 94 24.7% 0.247368421
5 The media, to a somewhat greater extent 127 33.4% 0.334210526
6 The media, to a greater extent 67 17.6% 0.176315789
7 Primarily the media 20 5.3% 0.052631579
97 Not answered 1 0.3% 0.002631579
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1sm2


Variable label: Does traditional media or social media matter most regarding which issues are put on the agenda?
Pre-question text: In your opinion…
Literal question: does traditional media or social media matter most regarding which issues are put on the agenda?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1sm2;r19k1sm2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Primarily traditional media 47 12.4% 0.12368421
2 Traditional media, to a greater extent 122 32.1% 0.32105263
3 Traditional media, to a somewhat greater extent 115 30.3% 0.30263158
4 Traditional and social media have equal influence 52 13.7% 0.13684211
5 Social media, to a somewhat greater extent 32 8.4% 0.08421053
6 Social media, to a greater extent 12 3.2% 0.03157895
7 Primarily social media 0 0% 0.00000000
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1sm3


Variable label: Politicians’ agenda in social media, to brag about themselves and their own policies or to make contact/dialogue?
Pre-question text: In your opinion…
Literal question: are politicians who post issues on social media mostly just concerned with bragging about themselves and their own policies, or do you think they want to make contact and create a dialogue?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1sm3;r19k1sm3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Primarily concerned with bragging about themselves and their own policies 69 18.2% 0.181578947
2 Concerned to a greater extent with bragging about themselves and their own policies 109 28.7% 0.286842105
3 Concerned to a somewhat greater extent with bragging about themselves and their own policies 104 27.4% 0.273684211
4 Equally concerned with bragging about themselves and their own policies as wanting to make contact and create a dialogue 56 14.7% 0.147368421
5 To a somewhat greater extent, want to make contact and create a dialogue 27 7.1% 0.071052632
6 To a greater extent, want to make contact and create a dialogue 9 2.4% 0.023684211
7 Primarily, want to make contact and create a dialogue 2 0.5% 0.005263158
97 Not answered 4 1.1% 0.010526316
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1sm4


Variable label: Social media as enriching or detrimental to the public debate?
Pre-question text: In your opinion…
Literal question: is social media essentially enriching the public political debate, or is social media essentially detrimental to the public political debate?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1sm4;r19k1sm4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Social media is very enriching 6 1.6% 0.015789474
2 Social media is quite enriching 60 15.8% 0.157894737
3 Social media is somewhat enriching 110 28.9% 0.289473684
4 Equally enriching as it is detrimental to the public political debate 81 21.3% 0.213157895
5 Social media is somewhat detrimental 64 16.8% 0.168421053
6 Social media is quite detrimental 48 12.6% 0.126315789
7 Social media is very detrimental 9 2.4% 0.023684211
97 Not answered 2 0.5% 0.005263158
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1sm101


Variable label: Whether you use social media as a news tool or not
Pre-question text: How would you describe the way you use social media as a news tool?
Literal question:

A: I follow politicians on social media to find new issues and angles

B: Politicians’ social media activity is of little importance to my news work
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree with A 29 7.6% 0.07631579
2 Agree much more with A 42 11.1% 0.11052632
3 Agree somewhat more with A 59 15.5% 0.15526316
4 Equally agree with A and B 44 11.6% 0.11578947
5 Agree somewhat more with B 59 15.5% 0.15526316
6 Agree much more with B 90 23.7% 0.23684211
7 Completely agree with B 52 13.7% 0.13684211
97 Not answered 5 1.3% 0.01315789
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1sm102_1


Variable label: Experience how often: Politicians share your or your colleagues’ news stories
Pre-question text: How often would you say you…
Literal question: experience politicians sharing your news stories or your colleagues’ news stories?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Never 3 0.8% 0.007894737
2 Very rarely 33 8.7% 0.086842105
3 Rarely 25 6.6% 0.065789474
4 Sometimes 152 40% 0.400000000
5 Often 75 19.7% 0.197368421
6 Very often 10 2.6% 0.026315789
7 Do not share/comment on news stories 9 2.4% 0.023684211
8 Not relevant 53 13.9% 0.139473684
97 Not answered 20 5.3% 0.052631579
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1sm102_2


Variable label: Experience how often: Politicians comment on your or your colleagues’ news stories to emphasise the point of the news story
Pre-question text: How often would you say you…
Literal question: experience politicians commenting on your news stories or your colleagues’ news stories to emphasise the point of the news story?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Never 5 1.3% 0.01315789
2 Very rarely 39 10.3% 0.10263158
3 Rarely 51 13.4% 0.13421053
4 Sometimes 129 33.9% 0.33947368
5 Often 56 14.7% 0.14736842
6 Very often 8 2.1% 0.02105263
7 Do not share/comment on news stories 8 2.1% 0.02105263
8 Not relevant to me 63 16.6% 0.16578947
97 Not answered 21 5.5% 0.05526316
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1sm102_3


Variable label: Experience how often: Politicians comment on your news stories for the angle to better suit the politician’s views
Pre-question text: How often would you say you…
Literal question: experience politicians commenting on your news stories or your colleagues’ news stories in order for the angle to better suit the politician’s views?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Never 13 3.4% 0.03421053
2 Very rarely 49 12.9% 0.12894737
3 Rarely 61 16.1% 0.16052632
4 Sometimes 122 32.1% 0.32105263
5 Often 25 6.6% 0.06578947
6 Very often 11 2.9% 0.02894737
7 Do not share/comment on news stories 8 2.1% 0.02105263
8 Not relevant to me 69 18.2% 0.18157895
97 Not answered 22 5.8% 0.05789474
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1lobby1_1


Variable label: The past year, how often how you received requests from: Business organisations
Pre-question text: How often have you received written or oral requests from the following types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
Literal question: Business organisations
Post-question: Tick each relevant organisation.
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1lobby1_1;p4k1lobby1_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly 92 24.2% 0.24210526
2 Monthly 96 25.3% 0.25263158
3 Less frequently 102 26.8% 0.26842105
4 Never 63 16.6% 0.16578947
97 Not answered 27 7.1% 0.07105263
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1lobby1_2


Variable label: The past year, how often how you received requests from: Trade unions/professional organisations
Pre-question text: How often have you received written or oral requests from the following types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
Literal question: Trade unions and professional organisations
Post-question: Tick each relevant organisation.
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1lobby1_2;p4k1lobby1_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly 51 13.4% 0.13421053
2 Monthly 112 29.5% 0.29473684
3 Less frequently 129 33.9% 0.33947368
4 Never 63 16.6% 0.16578947
97 Not answered 25 6.6% 0.06578947
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1lobby1_3


Variable label: The past year, how often how you received requests from: Environmental protection organisations
Pre-question text: How often have you received written or oral requests from the following types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
Literal question: Environmental protection organisations
Post-question: Tick each relevant organisation.
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1lobby1_3;p4k1lobby1_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly 45 11.8% 0.11842105
2 Monthly 103 27.1% 0.27105263
3 Less frequently 127 33.4% 0.33421053
4 Never 78 20.5% 0.20526316
97 Not answered 27 7.1% 0.07105263
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1lobby1_4


Variable label: The past year, how often how you received requests from: Health/welfare organisations
Pre-question text: How often have you received written or oral requests from the following types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
Literal question: Health/welfare organisations
Post-question: Tick each relevant organisation.
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1lobby1_4;p4k1lobby1_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly 32 8.4% 0.08421053
2 Monthly 89 23.4% 0.23421053
3 Less frequently 155 40.8% 0.40789474
4 Never 77 20.3% 0.20263158
97 Not answered 27 7.1% 0.07105263
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1lobby1_5


Variable label: The past year, how often how you received requests from: Cultural/sports/leisure organisations
Pre-question text: How often have you received written or oral requests from the following types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
Literal question: Cultural/sports/leisure organisations
Post-question: Tick each relevant organisation.
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1lobby1_5;p4k1lobby1_5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly 65 17.1% 0.17105263
2 Monthly 110 28.9% 0.28947368
3 Less frequently 113 29.7% 0.29736842
4 Never 66 17.4% 0.17368421
97 Not answered 26 6.8% 0.06842105
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1lobby1_6


Variable label: The past year, how often how you received requests from: PR agencies/communications agencies
Pre-question text: How often have you received written or oral requests from the following types of organisations or their representatives during the past year?
Literal question: PR agencies/communications agencies
Post-question: Tick each relevant organisation.
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1lobby1_6;p4k1lobby1_6
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly 99 26.1% 0.26052632
2 Monthly 88 23.2% 0.23157895
3 Less frequently 108 28.4% 0.28421053
4 Never 58 15.3% 0.15263158
97 Not answered 27 7.1% 0.07105263
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1lobby102_1


Variable label: How often the following actors influence the coverage of cases in the medium where you work: Business organisations
Pre-question text: Generally speaking and in the medium which you work, how often would you say that the following actors influence the coverage of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest? 
Literal question: Business organisations
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very often 17 4.5% 0.04473684
2 Quite often 72 18.9% 0.18947368
3 Sometimes 107 28.2% 0.28157895
4 Rarely 42 11.1% 0.11052632
5 Very rarely 49 12.9% 0.12894737
6 Never 33 8.7% 0.08684211
97 Not answered 60 15.8% 0.15789474
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1lobby102_2


Variable label: How often the following actors influence the coverage of cases in the medium where you work: Trade unions/professional organisations
Pre-question text: Generally speaking and in the medium which you work, how often would you say that the following actors influence the coverage of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest? 
Literal question: Trade unions and professional organisations
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very often 9 2.4% 0.02368421
2 Quite often 45 11.8% 0.11842105
3 Sometimes 131 34.5% 0.34473684
4 Rarely 54 14.2% 0.14210526
5 Very rarely 44 11.6% 0.11578947
6 Never 33 8.7% 0.08684211
97 Not answered 64 16.8% 0.16842105
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1lobby102_3


Variable label: How often the following actors influence the coverage of cases in the medium where you work: Environmental protection organisations
Pre-question text: Generally speaking and in the medium which you work, how often would you say that the following actors influence the coverage of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest? 
Literal question: Environmental protection organisations
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very often 9 2.4% 0.02368421
2 Quite often 57 15% 0.15000000
3 Sometimes 112 29.5% 0.29473684
4 Rarely 64 16.8% 0.16842105
5 Very rarely 44 11.6% 0.11578947
6 Never 32 8.4% 0.08421053
97 Not answered 62 16.3% 0.16315789
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1lobby102_4


Variable label: How often the following actors influence the coverage of cases in the medium where you work: Health/welfare organisations
Pre-question text: Generally speaking and in the medium which you work, how often would you say that the following actors influence the coverage of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest? 
Literal question: Health/welfare organisations
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very often 8 2.1% 0.02105263
2 Quite often 37 9.7% 0.09736842
3 Sometimes 126 33.2% 0.33157895
4 Rarely 57 15% 0.15000000
5 Very rarely 49 12.9% 0.12894737
6 Never 40 10.5% 0.10526316
97 Not answered 63 16.6% 0.16578947
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1lobby102_5


Variable label: How often the following actors influence the coverage of cases in the medium where you work: Cultural/sports/leisure organisations
Pre-question text: Generally speaking and in the medium which you work, how often would you say that the following actors influence the coverage of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest? 
Literal question: Cultural/sports/leisure organisations
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very often 11 2.9% 0.02894737
2 Quite often 61 16.1% 0.16052632
3 Sometimes 115 30.3% 0.30263158
4 Rarely 52 13.7% 0.13684211
5 Very rarely 45 11.8% 0.11842105
6 Never 33 8.7% 0.08684211
97 Not answered 63 16.6% 0.16578947
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1lobby102_6


Variable label: How often the following actors influence the coverage of cases in the medium where you work: PR agencies/communications agencies
Pre-question text: Generally speaking and in the medium which you work, how often would you say that the following actors influence the coverage of cases that involves the actor’s area of interest? 
Literal question: PR agencies/communications agencies
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very often 11 2.9% 0.02894737
2 Quite often 47 12.4% 0.12368421
3 Sometimes 95 25% 0.25000000
4 Rarely 65 17.1% 0.17105263
5 Very rarely 59 15.5% 0.15526316
6 Never 41 10.8% 0.10789474
97 Not answered 62 16.3% 0.16315789
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1dommere1


Variable label: To what extent appointment of Supreme Court justices should take into account social and cultural diversity
Pre-question text: Provided that applicants to the Supreme Court of Norway’s judicial offices have the necessary professional qualifications, applicant assessments may also take into account that the Supreme Court should reflect Norway both socially and culturally.
Literal question: To what extent do you think that the appointment of Supreme Court justices should take into account the social and cultural diversity found in society?
Question owner: Gunnar Grendstad (UiB); Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB); Jon Kåre Skiple (NORCE); Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE); Ingvild Misje (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1dommere1;p4k1dommere1;r19k1dommere1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 57 15% 0.15000000
2 To a large extent 113 29.7% 0.29736842
3 To some extent 112 29.5% 0.29473684
4 To a small extent 32 8.4% 0.08421053
5 Not at all 18 4.7% 0.04736842
97 Not answered 48 12.6% 0.12631579
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1dommere2


Variable label: To what extent Supreme Court justices must have ‘insight and involvement in general societal issues’
Pre-question text: The assessment of applicants to the judicial offices must follow the applicable guidelines.
Literal question: To what extent do you agree with the guidelines that say Supreme Court justices must have ‘insight and involvement in general societal issues’?
Question owner: Gunnar Grendstad (UiB); Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB); Jon Kåre Skiple (NORCE); Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE); Ingvild Misje (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1dommere2;p4k1dommere2;r19k1dommere2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 131 34.5% 0.34473684
2 To a large extent 141 37.1% 0.37105263
3 To some extent 49 12.9% 0.12894737
4 To a small extent 7 1.8% 0.01842105
5 Not at all 0 0% 0.00000000
97 Not answered 52 13.7% 0.13684211
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1dommere3_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1dommere3.]
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1dommere3_ran1;p4k1dommere3_ran1;r19k1dommere3_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1dommere3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:332] [Invalid:428] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 156 47% 0.4698795
2 14 out of 20 justices are born in the Oslo area, 18 out of 20 justices have been educated in Oslo, and 17 of the justices have spent at least 80 percent of their working lives in Oslo. 176 53% 0.5301205
Sysmiss 428 NA


j1k1dommere3


Variable label: How important that the Supreme Court of Norway has a composition of justices that reflects Norway geographically
Pre-question text:

The Supreme Court of Norway is the judicial branch and makes an increasing number of decisions that bring the court of law closer to the Storting which is the legislative branch. [k1dommere3_ran1]

Literal question: How important do you think it is that the Supreme Court of Norway has a composition of justices that reflects Norway geographically?
Question owner: Gunnar Grendstad (UiB); Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB); Jon Kåre Skiple (NORCE); Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE); Ingvild Misje (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1dommere3;p4k1dommere3;r19k1dommere3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in j1k1dommere3_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 94 24.7% 0.24736842
2 Important 109 28.7% 0.28684211
3 Somewhat important 73 19.2% 0.19210526
4 Not very important 46 12.1% 0.12105263
5 Not important at all 7 1.8% 0.01842105
97 Not answered 51 13.4% 0.13421053
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ansvar1_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1ansvar1_1.]
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar1_ran1;p4k1ansvar1_ran1;r19k1ansvar1_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1ansvar1_1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:329] [Invalid:431] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 169 51.4% 0.5136778
2 Primary and lower secondary school results are very important for many people, and they have been shown to play a significant role regarding which political party people vote for. 160 48.6% 0.4863222
Sysmiss 431 NA


j1k1ansvar1_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1ansvar1_1.]
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar1_ran2;p4k1ansvar1_ran2;r19k1ansvar1_ran2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1ansvar1_1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:329] [Invalid:431] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 better 171 52% 0.5197568
2 worse 158 48% 0.4802432
Sysmiss 431 NA


j1k1ansvar1_1


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Committed headteachers/school staff
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Committed headteachers and school staff.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar1_1;p4k1ansvar1_1;r19k1ansvar1_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in j1k1ansvar1_ran1 and j1k1ansvar1_ran2. Asked on the same page as j1k1ansvar2 and j1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 73 19.2% 0.1921053
1 Selected 248 65.3% 0.6526316
97 Not answered 59 15.5% 0.1552632
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ansvar1_2


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Parents who take responsibility
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Parents who take responsibility for their children’s education.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar1_2;p4k1ansvar1_2;r19k1ansvar1_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1ansvar2 and j1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 156 41.1% 0.4105263
1 Selected 165 43.4% 0.4342105
97 Not answered 59 15.5% 0.1552632
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ansvar1_3


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Commitment among the parties in power/the mayor’s political party
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran]] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Commitment to educational policy among the parties in power / the mayor’s political party.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar1_3;p4k1ansvar1_3;r19k1ansvar1_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1ansvar2 and j1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 235 61.8% 0.6184211
1 Selected 86 22.6% 0.2263158
97 Not answered 59 15.5% 0.1552632
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ansvar1_4


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Commitment among the opposition
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Commitment to educational policy among the opposition / municipal councillors who are not members of the mayor’s political party.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar1_4;p4k1ansvar1_4;r19k1ansvar1_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1ansvar2 and j1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 272 71.6% 0.7157895
1 Selected 49 12.9% 0.1289474
97 Not answered 59 15.5% 0.1552632
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ansvar1_5


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Policies and funding from the County Authority/Government
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Policies and funding from the County Authority/Government.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar1_5;p4k1ansvar1_5;r19k1ansvar1_5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1ansvar2 and j1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 193 50.8% 0.5078947
1 Selected 128 33.7% 0.3368421
97 Not answered 59 15.5% 0.1552632
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ansvar2_1


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: Headteachers and school staff
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Headteachers and school staff
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar2_1;p4k1ansvar2_1;r19k1ansvar2_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1ansvar1 and j1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 183 48.2% 0.48157895
2 2 67 17.6% 0.17631579
3 3 34 8.9% 0.08947368
97 Not answered 96 25.3% 0.25263158
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ansvar2_2


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: Public sector employees/municipal administration
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Public sector employees / municipal administration
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar2_2;p4k1ansvar2_2;r19k1ansvar2_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1ansvar1 and j1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 16 4.2% 0.04210526
2 2 40 10.5% 0.10526316
3 3 67 17.6% 0.17631579
97 Not answered 257 67.6% 0.67631579
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ansvar2_3


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: Parents
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Parents
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar2_3;p4k1ansvar2_3;r19k1ansvar2_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1ansvar1 and j1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 29 7.6% 0.07631579
2 2 99 26.1% 0.26052632
3 3 66 17.4% 0.17368421
97 Not answered 186 48.9% 0.48947368
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ansvar2_4


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: The parties in power/The mayor’s political party
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: The parties in power/ The mayor’s political party
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar2_4;p4k1ansvar2_4;r19k1ansvar2_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1ansvar1 and j1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 36 9.5% 0.09473684
2 2 47 12.4% 0.12368421
3 3 53 13.9% 0.13947368
97 Not answered 244 64.2% 0.64210526
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ansvar2_5


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: The opposition/Municipal councillors who are not members of the mayor’s political party
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: The opposition / Municipal councillors who are not members of the mayor’s political party
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar2_5;p4k1ansvar2_5;r19k1ansvar2_5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1ansvar1 and j1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 1 0.3% 0.002631579
2 2 8 2.1% 0.021052632
3 3 9 2.4% 0.023684211
97 Not answered 362 95.3% 0.952631579
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ansvar2_6


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: The county authority/ National government
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: The county authority/ National government
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar2_6;p4k1ansvar2_6;r19k1ansvar2_6
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1ansvar1 and j1k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 46 12.1% 0.1210526
2 2 40 10.5% 0.1052632
3 3 66 17.4% 0.1736842
97 Not answered 228 60% 0.6000000
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ansvar3


Variable label: Whether new results for schools would have affected the voter turnout for the mayor’s political party
Literal question: Do you think these new results for primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality would have affected the voter turnout for the mayor’s political party at the next local election?
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar3;p4k1ansvar3;r19k1ansvar3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1ansvar1 and j1k1ansvar2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly unlikely 26 6.8% 0.068421053
2 Quite unlikely 41 10.8% 0.107894737
3 Unlikely 56 14.7% 0.147368421
4 Neutral 110 28.9% 0.289473684
5 Likely 68 17.9% 0.178947368
6 Quite likely 7 1.8% 0.018421053
7 Highly likely 3 0.8% 0.007894737
97 Not answered 69 18.2% 0.181578947
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1udidir1_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1udidir1.]
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1udidir1_ran1;r19k1udidir1_ran1;f1k1udidir1_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1udidir1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:320] [Invalid:440] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The new director has several years of experience in the field of immigration. Hansen has extensive political experience and has recently been a state secretary (deputy minister) in the Ministry of Justice and Public Security. 75 23.4% 0.234375
2 The new director does not have experience in the field of immigration. Hansen has extensive political experience and has recently been a state secretary (deputy minister) in the Ministry of Transport. 85 26.6% 0.265625
3 The new director has several years of experience in the field of immigration. Hansen arrives after leaving his position as Director General (administrative deputy) in the Ministry of Justice and Public Security. He has also held several other positions in central administration. 81 25.3% 0.253125
4 The new director does not have experience in the field of immigration. Hansen arrives after leaving his position as Director General (administrative deputy) in the Ministry of Transport. He has also held several other positions in central administration. 79 24.7% 0.246875
Sysmiss 440 NA


j1k1udidir1


Variable label: How well qualified is Jan Hansen regarding the position of director at the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration?
Pre-question text: Imagine a case where a person, Jan Hansen, is employed as the new director of the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI). The Norwegian Directorate of Immigration is governed by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security and implements the Government’s refugee and immigration policies. [k1udidir1_ran1]
Literal question: How well qualified do you think Jan Hansen is regarding the position of director at the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration?
Question owner: Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1udidir1;r19k1udidir1;f1k1udidir1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 1]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in j1k1udidir1_ran1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well qualified 12 3.2% 0.03157895
2 Well qualified 92 24.2% 0.24210526
3 Somewhat qualified 59 15.5% 0.15526316
4 Neither well nor poorly qualified 59 15.5% 0.15526316
5 Somewhat poorly qualified 45 11.8% 0.11842105
6 Poorly qualified 32 8.4% 0.08421053
7 Very poorly qualified 12 3.2% 0.03157895
97 Not answered 69 18.2% 0.18157895
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1udidir2


Variable label: What advice do you think UDI’s Director Hansen will give the minister on how the case should be handled politically?
Pre-question text: Imagine a case emerging where government policy is clearly in violation of a recommendation set out by experts from the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration. The Minister of Justice and Public Security is aware of the professional recommendation, but still asks UDI’s Director Jan Hansen for advice on how the case should be handled politically.
Literal question: What advice do you think Hansen will give the minister?
Question owner: Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1udidir2;p4k1udidir2;r19k1udidir2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To fully follow the professional recommendation 36 9.5% 0.09473684
2 To follow the professional recommendation to a large extent 112 29.5% 0.29473684
3 To follow the professional recommendation to some extent 55 14.5% 0.14473684
4 Follow both in equal measures 32 8.4% 0.08421053
5 To follow the Government’s original policy to some extent 30 7.9% 0.07894737
6 To follow the Government’s original policy to a large extent 29 7.6% 0.07631579
7 To fully follow the Government’s original policy 5 1.3% 0.01315789
97 Not answered 81 21.3% 0.21315789
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1udidir3


Variable label: How do you think UDI’s Director Hansen will resolve this case practically?
Pre-question text: The Minister of Justice and Public Security decides to disregard the professional recommendation. As Director of UDI, Jan Hansen can still influence how the case is practically resolved.  
Literal question: How do you think Hansen will resolve this case?
Post-question: He will…:
Question owner: Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1udidir3;p4k1udidir3;r19k1udidir3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Fully follow the professional recommendation 13 3.4% 0.03421053
2 Follow the professional recommendation to a large extent 43 11.3% 0.11315789
3 Follow the professional recommendation to some extent 48 12.6% 0.12631579
4 Follow the professional recommendation and the political decision in equal measures 47 12.4% 0.12368421
5 Follow government policy to some extent 43 11.3% 0.11315789
6 Follow government policy to a large extent 83 21.8% 0.21842105
7 Fully follow government policy 21 5.5% 0.05526316
97 Not answered 82 21.6% 0.21578947
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1udidir4


Variable label: How UDI’s Director Hansen will manage the new government’s less restrictive refugee and immigration policy
Pre-question text: Imagine that there is a change of government and the new government has a new, less restrictive refugee and immigration policy.  
Literal question: How do you think Hansen as UDI’s Director will manage the new government policy?
Post-question: He will…
Question owner: Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1udidir4;p4k1udidir4;r19k1udidir4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Fully implement the new government policy 40 10.5% 0.10526316
2 Implement the new government policy to a large extent 105 27.6% 0.27631579
3 Implement the new government policy to some extent 60 15.8% 0.15789474
4 Try to find solutions that are halfway between the new government policy and the old, more restrictive policy 61 16.1% 0.16052632
5 Retain the old, restrictive policy to some extent 24 6.3% 0.06315789
6 Retain the old, restrictive policy to a large extent 5 1.3% 0.01315789
7 Fully retain the old, restrictive policy 0 0% 0.00000000
97 Not answered 85 22.4% 0.22368421
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1kj112


Variable label: Gross annual income
Literal question: What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1kj112;p4k1kj112;r19k1kj112
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Less than 150 000 5 1.3% 0.01315789
2 150 001 – 300 000 6 1.6% 0.01578947
3 300 001 – 400 000 14 3.7% 0.03684211
4 400 001 – 500 000 31 8.2% 0.08157895
5 500 001 – 600 000 86 22.6% 0.22631579
6 600 001 – 700 000 97 25.5% 0.25526316
7 700 001 – 800 000 47 12.4% 0.12368421
8 800 001 – 900 000 40 10.5% 0.10526316
9 900 001 – 1 000 000 21 5.5% 0.05526316
10 1 000 001 – 1 100 000 13 3.4% 0.03421053
11 More than 1 100 000 20 5.3% 0.05263158
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1sentral1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Central authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway
Pre-question text:

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

Literal question: Central authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1sentral1;p4k1sentral1;r19k1sentral1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 38 10% 0.10000000
2 Agree 85 22.4% 0.22368421
3 Somewhat agree 125 32.9% 0.32894737
4 Neither agree nor disagree 60 15.8% 0.15789474
5 Somewhat disagree 30 7.9% 0.07894737
6 Disagree 27 7.1% 0.07105263
7 Strongly disagree 11 2.9% 0.02894737
97 Not answered 4 1.1% 0.01052632
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1sentral2


Variable label: Where do you think it is best for children to grow up? 
Literal question: Where do you think it is best for children to grow up? 
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1sentral2;p4k1sentral2;r19k1sentral2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A big city 15 3.9% 0.039473684
2 A suburb or the outskirts of a big city 48 12.6% 0.126315789
3 A small or medium-sized city 116 30.5% 0.305263158
4 A village 36 9.5% 0.094736842
5 A sparsely populated area 13 3.4% 0.034210526
6 It does not matter 150 39.5% 0.394736842
97 Not answered 2 0.5% 0.005263158
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1sentral3_ran1


Variable label: [Randomly selects j1k1sentral3a or j1k1sentral3b.]
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1sentral3_ran1;p4k1sentral3_ran1;r19k1sentral3_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Randomly selects j1k1sentral3a or j1k1sentral3b.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:380] [Invalid:380] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selects k1sentral3a 192 50.5% 0.5052632
2 Selects k1sentral3b 188 49.5% 0.4947368
Sysmiss 380 NA


j1k1sentral3a


Variable label: What do you agree with the most: Public institutions should be A) larger/fewer or B) smaller/several
Pre-question text: Generally speaking, which of the following statements do you agree with the most:
Literal question:

A: There should be larger and fewer public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts.

B: There should be smaller and more public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1sentral3a;p4k1sentral3a;r19k1sentral3a
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 2 & j1k1sentral3_ran1 = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree with A 2 1% 0.01041667
2 Agree much more with A 18 9.4% 0.09375000
3 Agree somewhat more with A 32 16.7% 0.16666667
4 Equally agree with A and B 34 17.7% 0.17708333
5 Agree somewhat more with B 70 36.5% 0.36458333
6 Agree much more with B 26 13.5% 0.13541667
7 Completely agree with B 10 5.2% 0.05208333
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 568 NA


j1k1sentral3b


Variable label: What do you agree with the most: Public institutions should be A) smaller/several or B) larger/fewer
Pre-question text: Generally speaking, which of the following statements do you agree with the most:
Literal question:

A: There should be smaller and more public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts.

B: There should be larger and fewer public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1sentral3b;p4k1sentral3b;r19k1sentral3b
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if f1group = 2 & j1k1sentral3_ran1 = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree with A 13 6.9% 0.06914894
2 Agree much more with A 29 15.4% 0.15425532
3 Agree somewhat more with A 50 26.6% 0.26595745
4 Equally agree with A and B 35 18.6% 0.18617021
5 Agree somewhat more with B 32 17% 0.17021277
6 Agree much more with B 22 11.7% 0.11702128
7 Completely agree with B 5 2.7% 0.02659574
97 Not answered 2 1.1% 0.01063830
98 Not asked 572 NA


j1k1ulikhet1_1


Variable label: To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Hard work
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
Literal question: Hard work
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ulikhet1_1;p4k1ulikhet1_1;r19k1ulikhet1_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 128 33.7% 0.336842105
2 Agree 157 41.3% 0.413157895
3 Somewhat agree 52 13.7% 0.136842105
4 Neither agree nor disagree 23 6.1% 0.060526316
5 Somewhat disagree 5 1.3% 0.013157895
6 Disagree 8 2.1% 0.021052632
7 Strongly disagree 4 1.1% 0.010526316
97 Not answered 3 0.8% 0.007894737
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ulikhet1_2


Variable label: To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Luck
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
Literal question: Luck
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ulikhet1_2;p4k1ulikhet1_2;r19k1ulikhet1_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 32 8.4% 0.084210526
2 Agree 71 18.7% 0.186842105
3 Somewhat agree 69 18.2% 0.181578947
4 Neither agree nor disagree 112 29.5% 0.294736842
5 Somewhat disagree 32 8.4% 0.084210526
6 Disagree 40 10.5% 0.105263158
7 Strongly disagree 22 5.8% 0.057894737
97 Not answered 2 0.5% 0.005263158
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ulikhet1_3


Variable label: To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Talent
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
Literal question: Talent
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ulikhet1_3;p4k1ulikhet1_3;r19k1ulikhet1_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 83 21.8% 0.21842105
2 Agree 164 43.2% 0.43157895
3 Somewhat agree 78 20.5% 0.20526316
4 Neither agree nor disagree 32 8.4% 0.08421053
5 Somewhat disagree 6 1.6% 0.01578947
6 Disagree 8 2.1% 0.02105263
7 Strongly disagree 5 1.3% 0.01315789
97 Not answered 4 1.1% 0.01052632
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ulikhet1_4


Variable label: To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Family
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
Literal question: Family
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ulikhet1_4;p4k1ulikhet1_4;r19k1ulikhet1_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 31 8.2% 0.08157895
2 Agree 60 15.8% 0.15789474
3 Somewhat agree 65 17.1% 0.17105263
4 Neither agree nor disagree 92 24.2% 0.24210526
5 Somewhat disagree 49 12.9% 0.12894737
6 Disagree 43 11.3% 0.11315789
7 Strongly disagree 35 9.2% 0.09210526
97 Not answered 5 1.3% 0.01315789
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ulikhet2_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1ulikhet2.]
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1ulikhet2_ran1;r19k1ulikhet2_ran1;f1k1ulikhet2_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1ulikhet2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:380] [Invalid:380] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 137 36.1% 0.3605263
2 In Norway, the richest 10 percent of households own half of Norway’s private wealth. 116 30.5% 0.3052632
3 In Norway today, the poorest 50 percent of households own 5 percent of Norway’s private wealth. 127 33.4% 0.3342105
Sysmiss 380 NA


j1k1ulikhet2_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1ulikhet2.]
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1ulikhet2_ran2;r19k1ulikhet2_ran2;f1k1ulikhet2_ran2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1ulikhet2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:380] [Invalid:380] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 unequal political influence and power 88 23.2% 0.2315789
2 unequal life opportunities 96 25.3% 0.2526316
3 increased crime 111 29.2% 0.2921053
4 greater economic differences between men and women 85 22.4% 0.2236842
Sysmiss 380 NA


j1k1ulikhet2_ran3


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1ulikhet2.]
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1ulikhet2_ran3;r19k1ulikhet2_ran3;f1k1ulikhet2_ran3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1ulikhet2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:380] [Invalid:380] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Reintroducing inheritance tax 95 25% 0.2500000
2 Increasing wealth tax 104 27.4% 0.2736842
3 Raising taxes on very high incomes 91 23.9% 0.2394737
4 State capital transfers of approximately NOK 1 million to all Norwegian citizens when they turn 27 years old 90 23.7% 0.2368421
Sysmiss 380 NA


j1k1ulikhet2


Variable label: Your opinion on political propsal aimed at reducing wealth inequality
Pre-question text:

We would like to know your opinion on a political proposal aimed at reducing wealth inequality. [k1ulikhet2_ran1] Although wealth inequality may be fair for various reasons, it may lead to [k1ulikhet2_ran2].

[k1ulikhet2_ran3] may reduce wealth inequality.
Literal question: To what extent would you oppose or support such a proposal?
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ulikhet2;p4k1ulikhet2;r19k1ulikhet2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in j1k1ulikhet2_ran1-j1k1ulikhet2_ran3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very strongly oppose 24 6.3% 0.063157895
2 Strongly oppose 36 9.5% 0.094736842
3 Somewhat oppose 48 12.6% 0.126315789
4 Neither oppose nor support 87 22.9% 0.228947368
5 Somewhat support 79 20.8% 0.207894737
6 Support strongly 74 19.5% 0.194736842
7 Very strongly support 31 8.2% 0.081578947
97 Not answered 1 0.3% 0.002631579
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1miljo2


Variable label: Overall, what do you think about the efforts being made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Norway?
Pre-question text: Norway has set itself the objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to prevent harmful climate change. In order to achieve the objective of reducing emissions, a number of measures have been initiated.
Literal question: Overall, what do you think about the efforts being made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Norway?
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1miljo2;p4k1miljo2;r19k1miljo2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Random direction]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The efforts are too small 251 66.1% 0.66052632
2 The efforts are appropriate 104 27.4% 0.27368421
3 The efforts are too great 21 5.5% 0.05526316
97 Not answered 4 1.1% 0.01052632
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1miljo3


Variable label: What do you think about the technology used to limit climate change?
Pre-question text: One of the measures that Norway has worked on to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is the capture and storage of CO2 (carbon dioxide). On a large scale, the technology can play an important role in limiting climate change.
Literal question: What do you think about this technology?
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1miljo3;p4k1miljo3;r19k1miljo3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Random direction]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very negative 12 3.2% 0.031578947
2 Slightly negative 21 5.5% 0.055263158
3 Slightly positive 126 33.2% 0.331578947
4 Very positive 135 35.5% 0.355263158
5 No opinion / do not know 85 22.4% 0.223684211
97 Not answered 1 0.3% 0.002631579
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1media_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media plays an important role in highlighting the fates of individuals 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media plays an important role in highlighting the fates of individuals 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1media_1;p4k1media_1;r19k1media_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 177 46.6% 0.465789474
2 Agree 149 39.2% 0.392105263
3 Somewhat agree 31 8.2% 0.081578947
4 Neither agree nor disagree 9 2.4% 0.023684211
5 Somewhat disagree 5 1.3% 0.013157895
6 Disagree 2 0.5% 0.005263158
7 Strongly disagree 1 0.3% 0.002631579
97 Not answered 6 1.6% 0.015789474
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1media_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media plays an important role in revealing matters worthy of criticism 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media plays an important role in revealing matters worthy of criticism 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1media_2;p4k1media_2;r19k1media_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 328 86.3% 0.863157895
2 Agree 42 11.1% 0.110526316
3 Somewhat agree 4 1.1% 0.010526316
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1 0.3% 0.002631579
5 Somewhat disagree 0 0% 0.000000000
6 Disagree 0 0% 0.000000000
7 Strongly disagree 0 0% 0.000000000
97 Not answered 5 1.3% 0.013157895
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1media_3


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media is conflict-oriented 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media is conflict-oriented 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1media_3;p4k1media_3;r19k1media_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 61 16.1% 0.16052632
2 Agree 161 42.4% 0.42368421
3 Somewhat agree 119 31.3% 0.31315789
4 Neither agree nor disagree 14 3.7% 0.03684211
5 Somewhat disagree 14 3.7% 0.03684211
6 Disagree 5 1.3% 0.01315789
7 Strongly disagree 0 0% 0.00000000
97 Not answered 6 1.6% 0.01578947
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1media_4


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media sensationalises 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media sensationalises 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1media_4;p4k1media_4;r19k1media_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 45 11.8% 0.118421053
2 Agree 110 28.9% 0.289473684
3 Somewhat agree 158 41.6% 0.415789474
4 Neither agree nor disagree 25 6.6% 0.065789474
5 Somewhat disagree 23 6.1% 0.060526316
6 Disagree 8 2.1% 0.021052632
7 Strongly disagree 2 0.5% 0.005263158
97 Not answered 9 2.4% 0.023684211
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1media_5


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media conveys complicated issues in an understandable way 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media conveys complicated issues in an understandable way 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1media_5;p4k1media_5;r19k1media_5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 33 8.7% 0.086842105
2 Agree 171 45% 0.450000000
3 Somewhat agree 124 32.6% 0.326315789
4 Neither agree nor disagree 24 6.3% 0.063157895
5 Somewhat disagree 14 3.7% 0.036842105
6 Disagree 4 1.1% 0.010526316
7 Strongly disagree 3 0.8% 0.007894737
97 Not answered 7 1.8% 0.018421053
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1media_6


Variable label: Agree/disagree: News coverage is angled in a way that runs contrary to my own views
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: News coverage is angled in a way that runs contrary to my own views
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1media_6;p4k1media_6;r19k1media_6
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 5 1.3% 0.01315789
2 Agree 16 4.2% 0.04210526
3 Somewhat agree 61 16.1% 0.16052632
4 Neither agree nor disagree 148 38.9% 0.38947368
5 Somewhat disagree 58 15.3% 0.15263158
6 Disagree 67 17.6% 0.17631579
7 Strongly disagree 19 5% 0.05000000
97 Not answered 6 1.6% 0.01578947
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1fb1_imgnames_1


Variable label: [Image drawn randomly for “News story 1”. Used i j1k1fb1.]
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO), Rune Karlsen (UiO), Erik Knudsen (UiB/DIGSSCORE), Damian Trilling (University of Amsterdam)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1fb1_imgnames_1;r19k1fb1_imgnames_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Image drawn randomly for “News story 1”. Used i j1k1fb1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:377] [Invalid:383] [Range:-]



j1k1fb1_imgnames_2


Variable label: [Image drawn randomly for “News story 2”. Used i j1k1fb1.]
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO), Rune Karlsen (UiO), Erik Knudsen (UiB/DIGSSCORE), Damian Trilling (University of Amsterdam)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1fb1_imgnames_2;r19k1fb1_imgnames_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Image drawn randomly for “News story 2”. Used i j1k1fb1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:377] [Invalid:383] [Range:-]



j1k1fb1


Variable label: Which of two news stories you most likely would share on Facebook
Pre-question text:

Below, we will present two imaginary news stories similar to those one comes across on Facebook. Please look closely at each of the two imaginary news stories.

[Simulated Facebook post]
Literal question: If you had to choose one of them, which news story would you have chosen to share on Facebook?
Post-question: We are interested in responses from everyone, including those who do not usually share content on Facebook or do not have a Facebook account.
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO), Rune Karlsen (UiO), Erik Knudsen (UiB/DIGSSCORE), Damian Trilling (University of Amsterdam)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1fb1;r19k1fb1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Experiment where the respondent is exposed to two unique images of simulated Facebook posts. See background variables. Please contact Erik Knudsen () for more information. Asked on the same page as j1k1fb2 and j1k1fb3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I would share news story 1 185 48.7% 0.48684211
2 I would share news story 2 166 43.7% 0.43684211
97 Not answered 29 7.6% 0.07631579
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1fb2


Variable label: How likely is it that you would have shared News story 1 on Facebook?
Literal question: On a scale from 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have shared News story 1 on Facebook?
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO); Rune Karlsen (UiO); Erik Knudsen (UiB); Damian Trilling (UvA)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1fb2;r19k1fb2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1fb1 and j1k1fb3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Not at all likely 252 66.3% 0.66315789
2 2 - Not very likely 73 19.2% 0.19210526
3 3 - Somewhat likely 32 8.4% 0.08421053
4 4 - Likely 8 2.1% 0.02105263
5 5 - Highly likely 7 1.8% 0.01842105
97 Not answered 8 2.1% 0.02105263
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1fb3


Variable label: How likely is it that you would have shared News story 2 on Facebook?
Literal question: Using the same scale, how likely is it that you would have shared News story 2 on Facebook?
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO); Rune Karlsen (UiO); Erik Knudsen (UiB); Damian Trilling (UvA)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1fb3;r19k1fb3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Asked on the same page as j1k1fb1 and j1k1fb2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Not at all likely 237 62.4% 0.62368421
2 2 - Not very likely 86 22.6% 0.22631579
3 3 - Somewhat likely 34 8.9% 0.08947368
4 4 - Likely 12 3.2% 0.03157895
5 5 - Highly likely 4 1.1% 0.01052632
97 Not answered 7 1.8% 0.01842105
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1mi1_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi1_1 and j1k1mi1_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1mi1_ran1;r19k1mi1_ran1;f1k1mi1_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi1_1 and j1k1mi1_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:373] [Invalid:387] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Islamic values 182 48.8% 0.4879357
2 conservative notions about the position of women in Islam 191 51.2% 0.5120643
Sysmiss 387 NA


j1k1mi1_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi1_1 and j1k1mi1_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1mi1_ran2;r19k1mi1_ran2;f1k1mi1_ran2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi1_1 and j1k1mi1_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:373] [Invalid:387] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 k1mi1_1 184 49.3% 0.4932976
2 k1mi1_2 189 50.7% 0.5067024
Sysmiss 387 NA


j1k1mi1_1


Variable label: Should Norwegian Muslims be allowed to hold an event to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in Islam]?
Pre-question text: Some Norwegian Muslims have asked for permission to hold a public event in order to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in Islam].
Literal question: Do you think they should be allowed to hold such an event?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi1_1;p4k1mi1_1;r19k1mi1_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1k1mi1_ran2 = 1 & j1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in j1k1mi1_ran1 and j1k1mi1_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 144 78.3% 0.78260870
2 No 37 20.1% 0.20108696
97 Not answered 3 1.6% 0.01630435
98 Not asked 576 NA


j1k1mi1_2


Variable label: Does a majority/minority in Norway that muslims should be allowed to hold an event to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in Islam]?
Pre-question text: Some Norwegian Muslims have asked for permission to hold a public event in order to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in Islam]. What is your assessment:
Literal question: Is there a majority or a minority in Norway who thinks that they should be allowed to hold such an event?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi1_2;p4k1mi1_2;r19k1mi1_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1k1mi1_ran2 = 2 & j1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in j1k1mi1_ran1 and j1k1mi1_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A majortiy 100 52.9% 0.529100529
2 A minority 88 46.6% 0.465608466
97 Not answered 1 0.5% 0.005291005
98 Not asked 571 NA


j1k1mi2_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi2_1 and j1k1mi2_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1mi2_ran1;r19k1mi2_ran1;f1k1mi2_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi2_1 and j1k1mi2_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:372] [Invalid:388] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 be publicly recognised 182 48.9% 0.4892473
2 receive support from the state 190 51.1% 0.5107527
Sysmiss 388 NA


j1k1mi2_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi2_1 and j1k1mi2_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1mi2_ran2;r19k1mi2_ran2;f1k1mi2_ran2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi2_1 and j1k1mi2_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:372] [Invalid:388] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 k1mi2_1 198 53.2% 0.5322581
2 k1mi2_2 174 46.8% 0.4677419
Sysmiss 388 NA


j1k1mi2_1


Variable label: Do you think that Muslim traditions should [be publicly recognised/receive support from the state] in this country?
Literal question: Do you think that Muslim traditions and cultures should [be publicly recognised/receive support from the state] in this country?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi2_1;p4k1mi2_1;r19k1mi2_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1k1mi2_ran2 = 1 & j1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in j1k1mi2_ran1 og j1k1mi2_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 147 74.2% 0.742424242
2 No 50 25.3% 0.252525253
97 Not answered 1 0.5% 0.005050505
98 Not asked 562 NA


j1k1mi2_2


Variable label: Does a majority/minority think that Muslim traditions should [be publicly recognised/receive support from the state]in this country?
Pre-question text: What is your assessment:
Literal question: Is there a majority or a minority in Norway who thinks that Muslim traditions and cultures should [be publicly recognised/receive support from the state]in this country?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi2_2;p4k1mi2_2;r19k1mi2_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1k1mi2_ran2 = 2 & j1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in j1k1mi2_ran1 og j1k1mi2_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A majortiy 91 52.3% 0.52298851
2 A minority 78 44.8% 0.44827586
97 Not answered 5 2.9% 0.02873563
98 Not asked 586 NA


j1k1mi3_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi3_1 and j1k1mi3_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1mi3_ran1;r19k1mi3_ran1;f1k1mi3_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi3_1 and j1k1mi3_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:372] [Invalid:388] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Muslim local politicians 184 49.5% 0.4946237
2 Muslim religious leaders 188 50.5% 0.5053763
Sysmiss 388 NA


j1k1mi3_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi3_1 and j1k1mi3_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1mi3_ran2;r19k1mi3_ran2;f1k1mi3_ran2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi3_1 and j1k1mi3_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:372] [Invalid:388] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 k1mi3_1 190 51.1% 0.5107527
2 k1mi3_2 182 48.9% 0.4892473
Sysmiss 388 NA


j1k1mi3_1


Variable label: Trust/distrust Muslim [local politicians/religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
Literal question: Do you trust or distrust [Muslim local politicians/Muslim religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi3_1;p4k1mi3_1;r19k1mi3_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1k1mi3_ran2 = 1 & j1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in j1k1mi3_ran1 and j1k1mi3_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Trust 160 84.2% 0.84210526
2 Distrust 28 14.7% 0.14736842
97 Not answered 2 1.1% 0.01052632
98 Not asked 570 NA


j1k1mi3_2


Variable label: Does majority/minority trust/distrust [Muslim local politicians/Muslim religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
Pre-question text: What is your assessment:
Literal question: Does the majority in Norway trust or distrust [Muslim local politicians/Muslim religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi3_2;p4k1mi3_2;r19k1mi3_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1k1mi3_ran2 = 2 & j1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in j1k1mi3_ran1 and j1k1mi3_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The majority trusts 114 62.6% 0.62637363
2 The majority distrusts 64 35.2% 0.35164835
97 Not answered 4 2.2% 0.02197802
98 Not asked 578 NA


j1k1mi4_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi4_1 and j1k1mi4_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1mi4_ran1;r19k1mi4_ran1;f1k1mi4_ran1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi4_1 and j1k1mi4_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:371] [Invalid:389] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 reflect 187 50.4% 0.5040431
2 place less emphasis on 184 49.6% 0.4959569
Sysmiss 389 NA


j1k1mi4_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi4_1 and j1k1mi4_2.]
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1mi4_ran2;r19k1mi4_ran2;f1k1mi4_ran2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Randomized if j1group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in j1k1mi4_1 and j1k1mi4_2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:371] [Invalid:389] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 k1mi4_1 183 49.3% 0.4932615
2 k1mi4_2 188 50.7% 0.5067385
Sysmiss 389 NA


j1k1mi4_1


Variable label: Should school textbooks [reflect/place less emphasis on] the religious/cultural diversity in Norway?
Literal question: Do you think primary and lower secondary school textbooks should be written so that they [reflect/place less emphasis on] the religious and cultural diversity in Norway?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi4_1;p4k1mi4_1;r19k1mi4_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1k1mi4_ran2 = 1 & j1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in j1k1mi4_ran1 and j1k1mi4_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 99 54.1% 0.540983607
2 No 83 45.4% 0.453551913
97 Not answered 1 0.5% 0.005464481
98 Not asked 577 NA


j1k1mi4_2


Variable label: Does a majority/minority think that school textbooks should [reflect/place less emphasis on] religious/cultural diversity?
Pre-question text: What is your assessment:
Literal question: Is there a majority or a minority in Norway who thinks that primary and lower secondary school textbooks should be written so that they [reflect/place less emphasis on] the religious and cultural diversity in Norway?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi4_2;p4k1mi4_2;r19k1mi4_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1k1mi4_ran2 = 2 & j1group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in j1k1mi4_ran1 and j1k1mi4_ran2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A majortiy 102 54.3% 0.54255319
2 A minority 83 44.1% 0.44148936
97 Not answered 3 1.6% 0.01595745
98 Not asked 572 NA


j1k1imcp_1


Variable label: Describes you how well: Important for me to be unprejudiced towards immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced towards immigrants.
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1imcp_1;p4k1imcp_1;r19k1imcp_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 150 39.5% 0.394736842
2 Good 135 35.5% 0.355263158
3 Somewhat well 40 10.5% 0.105263158
4 Neither well nor poorly 29 7.6% 0.076315789
5 Somewhat poorly 7 1.8% 0.018421053
6 Poorly 3 0.8% 0.007894737
7 Very poorly 1 0.3% 0.002631579
97 Not answered 15 3.9% 0.039473684
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1imcp_2


Variable label: Describes you how well: Don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself.
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1imcp_2;p4k1imcp_2;r19k1imcp_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 135 35.5% 0.35526316
2 Good 127 33.4% 0.33421053
3 Somewhat well 39 10.3% 0.10263158
4 Neither well nor poorly 45 11.8% 0.11842105
5 Somewhat poorly 8 2.1% 0.02105263
6 Poorly 6 1.6% 0.01578947
7 Very poorly 5 1.3% 0.01315789
97 Not answered 15 3.9% 0.03947368
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1imcp_3


Variable label: Describes you how well: Feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1imcp_3;p4k1imcp_3;r19k1imcp_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 41 10.8% 0.10789474
2 Good 52 13.7% 0.13684211
3 Somewhat well 70 18.4% 0.18421053
4 Neither well nor poorly 113 29.7% 0.29736842
5 Somewhat poorly 23 6.1% 0.06052632
6 Poorly 45 11.8% 0.11842105
7 Very poorly 22 5.8% 0.05789474
97 Not answered 14 3.7% 0.03684211
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1imcp_4


Variable label: Describes you how well: Try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of own convictions
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of my own convictions.
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1imcp_4;p4k1imcp_4;r19k1imcp_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 136 35.8% 0.357894737
2 Good 131 34.5% 0.344736842
3 Somewhat well 45 11.8% 0.118421053
4 Neither well nor poorly 43 11.3% 0.113157895
5 Somewhat poorly 6 1.6% 0.015789474
6 Poorly 3 0.8% 0.007894737
7 Very poorly 1 0.3% 0.002631579
97 Not answered 15 3.9% 0.039473684
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1demtech1_1


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Public sector bureaucrats
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Public sector bureaucrats
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech1_1;p4k1demtech1_1;r19k1demtech1_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 27 7.1% 0.07105263
2 To a large extent 162 42.6% 0.42631579
3 To some extent 127 33.4% 0.33421053
4 To a small extent 35 9.2% 0.09210526
5 Not at all 6 1.6% 0.01578947
97 Not answered 23 6.1% 0.06052632
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1demtech1_2


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Teachers
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Teachers
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech1_2;p4k1demtech1_2;r19k1demtech1_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 36 9.5% 0.09473684
2 To a large extent 187 49.2% 0.49210526
3 To some extent 107 28.2% 0.28157895
4 To a small extent 25 6.6% 0.06578947
5 Not at all 6 1.6% 0.01578947
97 Not answered 19 5% 0.05000000
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1demtech1_3


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Journalists
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Journalists
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech1_3;p4k1demtech1_3;r19k1demtech1_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 27 7.1% 0.07105263
2 To a large extent 186 48.9% 0.48947368
3 To some extent 120 31.6% 0.31578947
4 To a small extent 22 5.8% 0.05789474
5 Not at all 5 1.3% 0.01315789
97 Not answered 20 5.3% 0.05263158
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1demtech1_4


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Researchers
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Researchers
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech1_4;p4k1demtech1_4;r19k1demtech1_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 55 14.5% 0.14473684
2 To a large extent 202 53.2% 0.53157895
3 To some extent 83 21.8% 0.21842105
4 To a small extent 14 3.7% 0.03684211
5 Not at all 6 1.6% 0.01578947
97 Not answered 20 5.3% 0.05263158
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1demtech1_5


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Judges
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Judges
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech1_5;p4k1demtech1_5;r19k1demtech1_5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 84 22.1% 0.22105263
2 To a large extent 206 54.2% 0.54210526
3 To some extent 54 14.2% 0.14210526
4 To a small extent 11 2.9% 0.02894737
5 Not at all 5 1.3% 0.01315789
97 Not answered 20 5.3% 0.05263158
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1demtech2_1


Variable label: Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Crisis management
Pre-question text: The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence. Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
Literal question: Crisis management
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech2_1;p4k1demtech2_1;r19k1demtech2_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Politicians should have full influence over the issue 9 2.4% 0.02368421
2 Politicians should have much more influence than experts 20 5.3% 0.05263158
3 Politicians should have more influence than experts 95 25% 0.25000000
4 Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence 90 23.7% 0.23684211
5 Experts should have more influence than politicians 89 23.4% 0.23421053
6 Experts should have much more influence than politicians 45 11.8% 0.11842105
7 Experts should have full influence over the issue 7 1.8% 0.01842105
97 Not answered 25 6.6% 0.06578947
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1demtech2_2


Variable label: Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Finance
Pre-question text: The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence. Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
Literal question: Finance
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech2_2;p4k1demtech2_2;r19k1demtech2_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Politicians should have full influence over the issue 21 5.5% 0.05526316
2 Politicians should have much more influence than experts 45 11.8% 0.11842105
3 Politicians should have more influence than experts 120 31.6% 0.31578947
4 Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence 85 22.4% 0.22368421
5 Experts should have more influence than politicians 62 16.3% 0.16315789
6 Experts should have much more influence than politicians 18 4.7% 0.04736842
7 Experts should have full influence over the issue 4 1.1% 0.01052632
97 Not answered 25 6.6% 0.06578947
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1demtech2_3


Variable label: Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Immigration
Pre-question text: The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence. Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
Literal question: Immigration
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech2_3;p4k1demtech2_3;r19k1demtech2_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Politicians should have full influence over the issue 20 5.3% 0.05263158
2 Politicians should have much more influence than experts 53 13.9% 0.13947368
3 Politicians should have more influence than experts 126 33.2% 0.33157895
4 Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence 88 23.2% 0.23157895
5 Experts should have more influence than politicians 45 11.8% 0.11842105
6 Experts should have much more influence than politicians 19 5% 0.05000000
7 Experts should have full influence over the issue 4 1.1% 0.01052632
97 Not answered 25 6.6% 0.06578947
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1demtech2_4


Variable label: Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Criminal policy
Pre-question text: The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence. Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
Literal question: Criminal policy
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech2_4;p4k1demtech2_4;r19k1demtech2_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Politicians should have full influence over the issue 14 3.7% 0.036842105
2 Politicians should have much more influence than experts 39 10.3% 0.102631579
3 Politicians should have more influence than experts 119 31.3% 0.313157895
4 Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence 83 21.8% 0.218421053
5 Experts should have more influence than politicians 62 16.3% 0.163157895
6 Experts should have much more influence than politicians 35 9.2% 0.092105263
7 Experts should have full influence over the issue 3 0.8% 0.007894737
97 Not answered 25 6.6% 0.065789474
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1ulikhet3


Variable label: The main reason why some people are poor in Norway
Literal question: The main reason why some people are poor in Norway is…
Post-question: Please select the reason that you think is most important.
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ulikhet3;p4k1ulikhet3;r19k1ulikhet3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 ... that some of them are generally lazy and work-shy 12 3.2% 0.03157895
2 ... that some of them are unfortunate 55 14.5% 0.14473684
3 ... that some of them come from an underprivileged family 178 46.8% 0.46842105
4 ... that some of them are underpaid 88 23.2% 0.23157895
5 ... that some of them lack innate abilities that are important in working life 20 5.3% 0.05263158
97 Not answered 27 7.1% 0.07105263
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1miljo1_1


Variable label: Statement: People have the right to change the natural environment so that it satisfies their needs
Pre-question text: Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
Literal question: People have the right to change the natural environment so that it satisfies their needs
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1miljo1_1;p4k1miljo1_1;r19k1miljo1_1
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 7 1.8% 0.01842105
2 Agree 30 7.9% 0.07894737
3 Somewhat agree 88 23.2% 0.23157895
4 Do not agree that much 145 38.2% 0.38157895
5 Do not agree at all 81 21.3% 0.21315789
97 Not answered 29 7.6% 0.07631579
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1miljo1_2


Variable label: Statement: We must take environmental considerations into account, even if it reduces economic growth
Pre-question text: Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
Literal question: We must take environmental considerations into account, even if it reduces economic growth
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1miljo1_2;p4k1miljo1_2;r19k1miljo1_2
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 132 34.7% 0.34736842
2 Agree 135 35.5% 0.35526316
3 Somewhat agree 67 17.6% 0.17631579
4 Do not agree that much 11 2.9% 0.02894737
5 Do not agree at all 9 2.4% 0.02368421
97 Not answered 26 6.8% 0.06842105
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1miljo1_3


Variable label: Statement: Norwegian environmental policy needs the same kind of urgent response as shown in the coronavirus crisis
Pre-question text: Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
Literal question: Norwegian environmental policy needs to see the same kind of urgent response that was shown in relation to the coronavirus crisis
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1miljo1_3;p4k1miljo1_3;r19k1miljo1_3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 115 30.3% 0.30263158
2 Agree 106 27.9% 0.27894737
3 Somewhat agree 90 23.7% 0.23684211
4 Do not agree that much 24 6.3% 0.06315789
5 Do not agree at all 18 4.7% 0.04736842
97 Not answered 27 7.1% 0.07105263
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1miljo1_4


Variable label: Statement: Technological innovations will solve climate problems
Pre-question text: Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
Literal question: Technological innovations will solve climate problems
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1miljo1_4;p4k1miljo1_4;r19k1miljo1_4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[Asked if j1group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 23 6.1% 0.06052632
2 Agree 87 22.9% 0.22894737
3 Somewhat agree 183 48.2% 0.48157895
4 Do not agree that much 45 11.8% 0.11842105
5 Do not agree at all 16 4.2% 0.04210526
97 Not answered 26 6.8% 0.06842105
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1fb4


Variable label: Your opinion about refugees who seek asylum in Norway and their opportunity to be granted residence here
Literal question: What is your opinion about refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you think it should be:
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO); Rune Karlsen (UiO); Erik Knudsen (UiB); Damian Trilling (UvA)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1fb4;r19k1fb4
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much easier 23 6.1% 0.06052632
2 Easier 66 17.4% 0.17368421
3 Somewhat easier 115 30.3% 0.30263158
4 Same as today 103 27.1% 0.27105263
5 Slightly more difficult 19 5% 0.05000000
6 More difficult 15 3.9% 0.03947368
7 Much more difficult 11 2.9% 0.02894737
97 Not answered 28 7.4% 0.07368421
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1fb5


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following suggestion:
Literal question: The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society to greater extent.
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO); Rune Karlsen (UiO); Erik Knudsen (UiB); Damian Trilling (UvA)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1fb5;r19k1fb5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Asked if j1group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 128 33.7% 0.33684211
2 Agree 121 31.8% 0.31842105
3 Somewhat agree 68 17.9% 0.17894737
4 Neither agree nor disagree 16 4.2% 0.04210526
5 Somewhat disagree 11 2.9% 0.02894737
6 Disagree 5 1.3% 0.01315789
7 Strongly disagree 6 1.6% 0.01578947
97 Not answered 25 6.6% 0.06578947
98 Not asked 380 NA


j1k1kj3


Variable label: What is your highest completed education?
Literal question: What is your highest completed education?
Post-question: If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1kj3
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:760] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No completed education 0 NaN
2 Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) 0 NaN
3 Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School, business college) 0 NaN
4 Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) 0 NaN
5 Craft training/shorter education programmes (e.g. vocational school, technical school/college, maritime vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot training, secretary school, home industry school/handicrafts school, master craftsman certificate training) 0 NaN
6 University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university college graduate 2 and 2½ years) 0 NaN
7 College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime subjects, military subjects etc.) 0 NaN
8 University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) 0 NaN
9 University college – 5-6 year education (MA, majors or longer vocational education on a university college level) 0 NaN
10 University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education (e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) 0 NaN
11 Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) 0 NaN
12 None of the above (please enter): 0 NaN
97 Not answered 0 NaN
Sysmiss 760 NA


j1k1kj3_12_other


Variable label: Open: What is your highest completed education?
Pre-question text: What is your highest completed education?
Literal question: None of the above (please enter):
Post-question: If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1kj3_12_other
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:760] [Range:-]



j1k1kj3_recode


Variable label: What is your highest completed education? [recoded]
Literal question: What is your highest completed education?
Post-question: If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Recoded from source variable: j1k1kj3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No education/elementary school 6 0.8% 0.007894737
2 Upper secondary education 97 12.8% 0.127631579
3 University/University college 557 73.3% 0.732894737
97 Not answered 100 13.2% 0.131578947
98 Not asked 0 NA


j1k1kj5


Variable label: Placement political left-right scale
Pre-question text: People often talk about right-wing economics and left-wing economics.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means left-wing in relation to economic issues and 10 means right-wing in relation to economic issues?
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1kj5;p4k1kj5
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 Left wing 14 1.8% 0.018421053
1 1 19 2.5% 0.025000000
2 2 71 9.3% 0.093421053
3 3 161 21.2% 0.211842105
4 4 121 15.9% 0.159210526
5 5 137 18% 0.180263158
6 6 65 8.6% 0.085526316
7 7 45 5.9% 0.059210526
8 8 22 2.9% 0.028947368
9 9 2 0.3% 0.002631579
10 10 Right wing 2 0.3% 0.002631579
97 Not answered 101 13.3% 0.132894737


j1k1kj6


Variable label: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1kj6
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 15 2% 0.019736842
2 The Conservative Party 80 10.5% 0.105263158
3 The Progressive Party 11 1.4% 0.014473684
4 The Liberal Party 62 8.2% 0.081578947
5 The Socialist Left Party 102 13.4% 0.134210526
6 The Centre Party 62 8.2% 0.081578947
7 The Green Party 82 10.8% 0.107894737
8 The Labour Party 122 16.1% 0.160526316
9 The Red Party 43 5.7% 0.056578947
10 Would not vote 22 2.9% 0.028947368
11 Not entitled to vote 1 0.1% 0.001315789
12 Other: 43 5.7% 0.056578947
97 Not answered 115 15.1% 0.151315789


j1k1kj6_12_other


Variable label: Open: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Pre-question text: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Literal question: Other:
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1kj6_12_other
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:760] [Range:-]



j1avslutt


Variable label: Open: Feedback about the survey
Literal question: Do you wish to provide feedback about the survey?
Post-question: If so, write below.
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:760] [Range:-]



j1P1


Variable label: Gender
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Male 396 52.1% 0.5210526
2 Female 273 35.9% 0.3592105
97 Not answered 91 12% 0.1197368


j1P2


Variable label: Region
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Oslo 183 24.1% 0.24078947
2 Østlandet 125 16.4% 0.16447368
3 Sørlandet 20 2.6% 0.02631579
4 Vestlandet 121 15.9% 0.15921053
5 Trøndelag 49 6.4% 0.06447368
6 Nord-Norge 38 5% 0.05000000
97 Not answered 224 29.5% 0.29473684


j1P3


Variable label: County
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:3-54]

Value Label Cases Percentage
3 Oslo 183 24.1% 0.24078947
11 Rogaland 40 5.3% 0.05263158
15 Møre og Romsdal 18 2.4% 0.02368421
18 Nordland 19 2.5% 0.02500000
30 Viken 83 10.9% 0.10921053
34 Innlandet 23 3% 0.03026316
38 Vestfold og Telemark 19 2.5% 0.02500000
42 Agder 20 2.6% 0.02631579
46 Vestland 63 8.3% 0.08289474
50 Trøndelag 49 6.4% 0.06447368
54 Troms og Finnmark 19 2.5% 0.02500000
97 Not answered 224 29.5% 0.29473684


j1P3_2


Variable label: Election district
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Akershus 55 7.2% 0.072368421
2 Oslo 183 24.1% 0.240789474
3 Østfold 18 2.4% 0.023684211
4 Vestfold 14 1.8% 0.018421053
5 Hedmark 15 2% 0.019736842
6 Oppland 8 1.1% 0.010526316
7 Buskerud 10 1.3% 0.013157895
8 Telemark 5 0.7% 0.006578947
9 Vest-Agder 12 1.6% 0.015789474
10 Aust-Agder 8 1.1% 0.010526316
11 Rogaland 40 5.3% 0.052631579
12 Hordaland 59 7.8% 0.077631579
13 Sogn og Fjordane 4 0.5% 0.005263158
14 Møre og Romsdal 18 2.4% 0.023684211
15 Nord-Trøndelag 12 1.6% 0.015789474
16 Sør-Trøndelag 37 4.9% 0.048684211
17 Nordland 19 2.5% 0.025000000
18 Troms 10 1.3% 0.013157895
19 Finnmark 9 1.2% 0.011842105
97 Not answered 224 29.5% 0.294736842


j1P4_1


Variable label: Highest level of completed education (condensed)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical description: [Source variable: j1k1kj3]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No education/elementary school 6 0.8% 0.007894737
2 Upper secondary education 97 12.8% 0.127631579
3 University/University college 557 73.3% 0.732894737
97 Not answered 100 13.2% 0.131578947


j1P5_1


Variable label: Year of birth (expanded)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1959 or earlier 86 11.3% 0.1131579
2 1960-1969 184 24.2% 0.2421053
3 1970-1979 173 22.8% 0.2276316
4 1980-1989 132 17.4% 0.1736842
5 1990 or later 87 11.4% 0.1144737
97 Not answered 98 12.9% 0.1289474


j1P5_2


Variable label: Year of birth (condensed)
Field period: 02.11.2020 - 21.05.2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:760] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1959 or earlier 86 11.3% 0.1131579
2 1960-1989 489 64.3% 0.6434211
3 1990 or later 87 11.4% 0.1144737
97 Not answered 98 12.9% 0.1289474