Citation
Researchers responsible
|
Name
|
Affiliaton
|
|
Ragnhild Muriaas
|
UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Gunnar Thesen
|
UiS
|
|
Dag Arne Christensen
|
NORCE
|
|
Troy Broderstad
|
UiT
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Georg Stokke
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Magnus Danielsen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Panel of Elected Representatives is an internet-based survey of
elected representatives, at all political levels, in Norway. The survey
deals with matters that are important to society, representation and
democracy. All elected politicians are invited to participate.
The Panel of Elected Representatives is part of the Digital Social
Science Core Facility (DIGSSCORE) at the University of Bergen (UiB). The
University of Bergen is the owner and treatment manager of the Panel of
Elected Representatives. Ideas2Evidence executes the practical
implementation of the survey, and are responsible for recruiting
participants, as well as sending and receiving surveys to and from
respondents. The data is stored encrypted and secure in UiB’s
infrastructure for for safe processing of sensitive personal data in
research, ‘SAFE’. The panel has been reported to and processed by the
Data Protection Official at UiB, cooperating with Sikt - Norwegian
Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research. More information
can be found at
uib.no/representant.
Scope
Geographic coverage: National.
Unit of
analysis: Elected representatives.
Universe: All elected representatives in Norway.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Elected representatives at all political levels in Norway - city
councils (Oslo), municipal councils, county councils, the Storting
(parliament) and the Sami Parliament of Norway - are invited to
participate in the Panel of Elected Representatives. Contact information
has been collected through Kommuneforlaget AS’ registers, as well as
public information from websites of municipalities, county
municipalitites, the Storting, and the Sami Parliament of Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a online questionnaire where the panel members
are invited by email. The panel members were recruited to the panel in
wave 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, and 11. Recruitment in wave 3 was due to the
2019 municipal election. Representatives who were not re-elected were
omitted from the panel, while newly elected and re-elected
representatives where invited to participate. Recruitment in wave 7 was
in the aftermath of the 2021 parliamentary election and recruited newly
elected parliamentary representatives, in addition to recruiting current
municipal and county representatives. Former parliamentary
representatives who were not relected were omitted for the panel.
Recruitment in wave 10 was in the aftermath of the 2023 municipal and
county election. Recruitment in wave 11 was minimal, as a small number
of elected representatives who reached out to become panel members, were
invited to participate.
For a more detailed description of how the members were recruited,
please see the documentation report from wave 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, and 11.
Wave 11 was fielded from 13th of November to the 16th of December 2024.
Change Log
No changes registred.
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
The Panel of Elected Representatives - round 11 - v-100-L.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Privileged
|
|
# Cases
|
1454
|
|
# Variables
|
146
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
p11_rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
The wave the respondent was recruited
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
324 |
22.3% |
0.222833563 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
355 |
24.4% |
0.244154058 |
| 5 |
Wave 5 |
45 |
3.1% |
0.030949106 |
| 7 |
Wave 7 |
37 |
2.5% |
0.025447043 |
| 8 |
Wave 8 |
28 |
1.9% |
0.019257221 |
| 10 |
Wave 10 |
658 |
45.3% |
0.452544704 |
| 11 |
Wave 11 |
7 |
0.5% |
0.004814305 |
p11_interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
p11_interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:1306] [Invalid:148]
[Range:-]
|
p11_browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
p11_browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
p11_mobil
|
Variable label:
|
Determines if the respondents uses a smartphone or tablet
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determines if the respondents uses a smartphone or tablet
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
847 |
58.3% |
0.5825309 |
| 1 |
Smartphone or tablet |
607 |
41.7% |
0.4174691 |
p11_opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
p11_enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
Determines respondents device type
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determines respondents device type
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
847 |
58.3% |
0.582530949 |
| 2 |
Touch |
593 |
40.8% |
0.407840440 |
| 3 |
Generic |
14 |
1.0% |
0.009628611 |
p11_advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
p11_getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
p11_pcmipo_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (1)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
1:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:1454] [Range:-]
|
p11_pcmipo_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (2)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
2:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:1454] [Range:-]
|
p11_pcmipo_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (3)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
3:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:1454] [Range:-]
|
p11_remem_1_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these are right for you: District council representative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these are right for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
District council representative
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_remem]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
4 |
1.5% |
0.01526718 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
258 |
98.5% |
0.98473282 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1192 |
|
NA |
p11_remem_2_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these are right for you: Municipal council representative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these are right for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Municipal council representative
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_remem]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
213 |
81.3% |
0.8129771 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
49 |
18.7% |
0.1870229 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1192 |
|
NA |
p11_remem_3_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these are right for you: County council representative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these are right for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
County council representative
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_remem]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
27 |
10.3% |
0.1030534 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
235 |
89.7% |
0.8969466 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1192 |
|
NA |
p11_remem_4_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these are right for you: Storting/parliamentary representative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these are right for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Storting/parliamentary representative
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_remem]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
7 |
2.7% |
0.02671756 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
255 |
97.3% |
0.97328244 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1192 |
|
NA |
p11_remem_5_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these are right for you: Sami Parliament representative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these are right for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sami Parliament representative
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_remem]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-0]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
262 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1192 |
|
NA |
p11_remem_6_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these are right for you: Deputy district council representative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these are right for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Deputy district council representative
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_remem]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003816794 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
261 |
99.6% |
0.996183206 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1192 |
|
NA |
p11_remem_7_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these are right for you: Deputy municipal council
representative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these are right for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Deputy municipal council representative
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_remem]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
25 |
9.5% |
0.09541985 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
237 |
90.5% |
0.90458015 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1192 |
|
NA |
p11_remem_8_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these are right for you: Deputy county council representative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these are right for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Deputy county council representative
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_remem]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
13 |
5.0% |
0.04961832 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
249 |
95.0% |
0.95038168 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1192 |
|
NA |
p11_remem_9_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these are right for you: Deputy Storting/parliamentary
representative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these are right for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Deputy Storting/parliamentary representative
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_remem]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01145038 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
259 |
98.9% |
0.98854962 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1192 |
|
NA |
p11_remem_10_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these are right for you: Deputy Sami Parliament representative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these are right for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Deputy Sami Parliament representative
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_remem]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-0]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
262 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1192 |
|
NA |
p11_remem_11_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these are right for you: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these are right for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_remem]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
30 |
11.5% |
0.1145038 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
232 |
88.5% |
0.8854962 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1192 |
|
NA |
p11_remem_11_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which of these are right for you: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these are right for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_remem]]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:1454] [Range:-]
|
p11_remem_level1
|
Variable label:
|
The most prioritized level the respondent has registered.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Combined variable of [p10_remem], [p11_remem] and registered elected
level from Kommuneforlaget. If the respondenten has answered either
[p10_remem] or [p11_remem] those are used, and prioritised in the
following way: 4, 5, 2, 3, 1, 9, 10, 7, 8, 6, 11. If the respondent has
not answered [p10_remem] or [p11_remem] information from Kommuneforlaget
is used.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
District council representative |
26 |
1.8% |
0.0178817056 |
| 2 |
Municipal council representative |
1144 |
78.7% |
0.7867950481 |
| 3 |
County council representative |
50 |
3.4% |
0.0343878955 |
| 4 |
Storting/parliamentary representative |
18 |
1.2% |
0.0123796424 |
| 5 |
Sami Parliament representative |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0013755158 |
| 6 |
Deputy district council representative |
5 |
0.3% |
0.0034387895 |
| 7 |
Deputy municipal council representative |
147 |
10.1% |
0.1011004127 |
| 8 |
Deputy county council representative |
5 |
0.3% |
0.0034387895 |
| 9 |
Deputy Storting/parliamentary representative |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000000 |
| 10 |
Deputy Sami Parliament representative |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006877579 |
| 11 |
Other: |
56 |
3.9% |
0.0385144429 |
p11_remem_level2
|
Variable label:
|
The second-most prioritized level the respondent has registered.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Combined variable of [p10_remem] and [p11_remem]. If the respondenten
has answered either [p10_remem] or [p11_remem] those are used, and
prioritised in the following way: 4, 5, 2, 3, 1, 9, 10, 7, 8, 6, 11.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:56] [Invalid:1398]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
District council representative |
2 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
| 2 |
Municipal council representative |
1 |
1.8% |
0.01785714 |
| 3 |
County council representative |
16 |
28.6% |
0.28571429 |
| 4 |
Storting/parliamentary representative |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 5 |
Sami Parliament representative |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 6 |
Deputy district council representative |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 7 |
Deputy municipal council representative |
6 |
10.7% |
0.10714286 |
| 8 |
Deputy county council representative |
12 |
21.4% |
0.21428571 |
| 9 |
Deputy Storting/parliamentary representative |
2 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
| 10 |
Deputy Sami Parliament representative |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 11 |
Other: |
17 |
30.4% |
0.30357143 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1398 |
|
NA |
p11_repar_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_repar] and
p11_remem_level1 = 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 11)]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Conservative Party |
42 |
16.5% |
0.165354331 |
| 2 |
The Labour Party |
84 |
33.1% |
0.330708661 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
17 |
6.7% |
0.066929134 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
47 |
18.5% |
0.185039370 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
13 |
5.1% |
0.051181102 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party |
11 |
4.3% |
0.043307087 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
7 |
2.8% |
0.027559055 |
| 8 |
The Christian Democrats |
11 |
4.3% |
0.043307087 |
| 10 |
The Red Party |
4 |
1.6% |
0.015748031 |
| 11 |
The Industry and Business Party |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003937008 |
| 12 |
The Pensioners' Party |
3 |
1.2% |
0.011811024 |
| 13 |
Other: |
14 |
5.5% |
0.055118110 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1200 |
|
NA |
p11_repar_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which party do you represent: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (repar_filter = 1 & p11_remem_level1 = 1, 2, 3, 6, 7,
8, 11)]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:1454] [Range:-]
|
p11_reparst
|
Variable label:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_reparst] and
p11_remem_level1 = 4, 9)]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Conservative Party |
2 |
28.6% |
0.2857143 |
| 2 |
The Labour Party |
2 |
28.6% |
0.2857143 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
1 |
14.3% |
0.1428571 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
1 |
14.3% |
0.1428571 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
1 |
14.3% |
0.1428571 |
| 8 |
The Christian Democrats |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 10 |
Patient focus |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 11 |
Other: |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1447 |
|
NA |
p11_reparst_11_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which party do you represent: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (reparst_filter = 1 & p11_remem_level1 = 4, 9)]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_reparsd
|
Variable label:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_reparsd] and
p11_remem_level1 = 5, 10)]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:98-*]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norgga Sámiid Riikkasearvi/Norske Samers Riksforbund |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 2 |
Bargiidbellodat/Arbeiderpartiet |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 3 |
Nordkalottfolket |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 4 |
Guovddášbellodat/Senterpartiet |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 5 |
Ávjovári Johttisápmelaccaid listu/Flyttsamelista |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 6 |
Ovddádusbellodat/Fremskrittspartiet |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 7 |
Sámeálbmotbellodat - Samefolkets parti |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 8 |
Other: |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1454 |
|
NA |
p11_reparsd_8_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which party do you represent: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (reparsd_filter = 1 & p11_remem_level1 = 5, 10)]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_reelm_1
|
Variable label:
|
How much importance do you place on the following reasons for your
motivation to become an elected representative: To contribute to the
local community
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last time you ran for election, how much
importance do you place on each of the following reasons for your
motivation to become an elected representative?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To contribute to the local community
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high importance |
875 |
60.2% |
0.601788171 |
| 2 |
High importance |
489 |
33.6% |
0.336313618 |
| 3 |
Some importance |
74 |
5.1% |
0.050894085 |
| 4 |
Low importance |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007565337 |
| 5 |
No importance at all |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001375516 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002063274 |
p11_reelm_2
|
Variable label:
|
How much importance do you place on the following reasons for your
motivation to become an elected representative: That I represent the
interests of a community group I am a part of, for example based on
gender, religion, class, or other.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last time you ran for election, how much
importance do you place on each of the following reasons for your
motivation to become an elected representative?
|
|
Literal question:
|
That I represent the interests of a community group I am a part of, for
example based on gender, religion, class, or other.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high importance |
221 |
15.2% |
0.151994498 |
| 2 |
High importance |
351 |
24.1% |
0.241403026 |
| 3 |
Some importance |
354 |
24.3% |
0.243466300 |
| 4 |
Low importance |
332 |
22.8% |
0.228335626 |
| 5 |
No importance at all |
182 |
12.5% |
0.125171939 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.0% |
0.009628611 |
p11_reelm_3
|
Variable label:
|
How much importance do you place on the following reasons for your
motivation to become an elected representative: Desire for a political
career and/or desire for general influence.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last time you ran for election, how much
importance do you place on each of the following reasons for your
motivation to become an elected representative?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Desire for a political career and/or desire for general influence.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high importance |
53 |
3.6% |
0.036451169 |
| 2 |
High importance |
195 |
13.4% |
0.134112792 |
| 3 |
Some importance |
413 |
28.4% |
0.284044017 |
| 4 |
Low importance |
570 |
39.2% |
0.392022008 |
| 5 |
No importance at all |
215 |
14.8% |
0.147867950 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005502063 |
p11_reelm_4
|
Variable label:
|
How much importance do you place on the following reasons for your
motivation to become an elected representative: To get something
specific implemented and/or to advocate for ideological views.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last time you ran for election, how much
importance do you place on each of the following reasons for your
motivation to become an elected representative?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To get something specific implemented and/or to advocate for ideological
views.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high importance |
316 |
21.7% |
0.217331499 |
| 2 |
High importance |
646 |
44.4% |
0.444291609 |
| 3 |
Some importance |
346 |
23.8% |
0.237964237 |
| 4 |
Low importance |
110 |
7.6% |
0.075653370 |
| 5 |
No importance at all |
29 |
2.0% |
0.019944979 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.004814305 |
p11_reelm_5
|
Variable label:
|
How much importance do you place on the following reasons for your
motivation to become an elected representative: Feeling of duty to
contribute.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last time you ran for election, how much
importance do you place on each of the following reasons for your
motivation to become an elected representative?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Feeling of duty to contribute.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high importance |
333 |
22.9% |
0.22902338 |
| 2 |
High importance |
541 |
37.2% |
0.37207703 |
| 3 |
Some importance |
329 |
22.6% |
0.22627235 |
| 4 |
Low importance |
173 |
11.9% |
0.11898212 |
| 5 |
No importance at all |
73 |
5.0% |
0.05020633 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.00343879 |
p11_pcsag
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
107 |
7.4% |
0.073590096 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
315 |
21.7% |
0.216643741 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
322 |
22.1% |
0.221458047 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
349 |
24.0% |
0.240027510 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
352 |
24.2% |
0.242090784 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.6% |
0.006189821 |
p11_pcecs
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in
Norway?
Do you think it is:
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
253 |
17.4% |
0.174002751 |
| 2 |
Good |
523 |
36.0% |
0.359697387 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
225 |
15.5% |
0.154745530 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
126 |
8.7% |
0.086657497 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
167 |
11.5% |
0.114855571 |
| 6 |
Bad |
114 |
7.8% |
0.078404402 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
44 |
3.0% |
0.030261348 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001375516 |
p11_repgrx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [p11_repgrx].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,6,7,8,11)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1433] [Invalid:21]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
that you are responsible for leading |
751 |
52.4% |
0.5240754 |
| 2 |
BLANK |
682 |
47.6% |
0.4759246 |
| Sysmiss |
|
21 |
|
NA |
p11_repgrx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [p11_repgrx].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,6,7,8,11)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1433] [Invalid:21]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
daytime |
726 |
50.7% |
0.5066294 |
| 2 |
evening |
707 |
49.3% |
0.4933706 |
| Sysmiss |
|
21 |
|
NA |
p11_repgrx_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [p11_repgrx].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,6,7,8,11)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1433] [Invalid:21]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
mother of small children |
733 |
51.2% |
0.5115143 |
| 2 |
father of small children |
700 |
48.8% |
0.4884857 |
| Sysmiss |
|
21 |
|
NA |
p11_repgrx_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would you be skeptical about including the following
people in a labor-intensive group that will promote an important issue
in your chosen body: An elected representative with long experience.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine [p11_repgrx_ran1] a working group of 4 representatives that will
promote an important issue in your chosen body. The group must meet
physically at [p11_repgrx_ran2] at least 2 times a week for a period of
3-4 months. To what extent would you be skeptical about including the
following people in such a labor-intensive group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
An elected representative with long experience.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,6,7,8,11)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not skeptical at all |
770 |
53.7% |
0.537334264 |
| 2 |
Slightly skeptical |
475 |
33.1% |
0.331472435 |
| 3 |
Somewhat skeptical |
125 |
8.7% |
0.087229588 |
| 4 |
Quite skeptical |
40 |
2.8% |
0.027913468 |
| 5 |
Very skeptical |
12 |
0.8% |
0.008374040 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007676204 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
21 |
|
NA |
p11_repgrx_2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would you be skeptical about including the following
people in a labor-intensive group that will promote an important issue
in your chosen body: An elected representative with a demanding job.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine [p11_repgrx_ran1] a working group of 4 representatives that will
promote an important issue in your chosen body. The group must meet
physically at [p11_repgrx_ran2] at least 2 times a week for a period of
3-4 months. To what extent would you be skeptical about including the
following people in such a labor-intensive group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
An elected representative with a demanding job.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,6,7,8,11)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not skeptical at all |
418 |
29.2% |
0.291695743 |
| 2 |
Slightly skeptical |
322 |
22.5% |
0.224703419 |
| 3 |
Somewhat skeptical |
427 |
29.8% |
0.297976274 |
| 4 |
Quite skeptical |
203 |
14.2% |
0.141660851 |
| 5 |
Very skeptical |
52 |
3.6% |
0.036287509 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007676204 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
21 |
|
NA |
p11_repgrx_3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would you be skeptical about including the following
people in a labor-intensive group that will promote an important issue
in your chosen body: An elected representative with good relationships
with other members of the municipal council.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine [p11_repgrx_ran1] a working group of 4 representatives that will
promote an important issue in your chosen body. The group must meet
physically at [p11_repgrx_ran2] at least 2 times a week for a period of
3-4 months. To what extent would you be skeptical about including the
following people in such a labor-intensive group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
An elected representative with good relationships with other members of
the municipal council.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,6,7,8,11)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not skeptical at all |
822 |
57.4% |
0.57362177 |
| 2 |
Slightly skeptical |
457 |
31.9% |
0.31891137 |
| 3 |
Somewhat skeptical |
103 |
7.2% |
0.07187718 |
| 4 |
Quite skeptical |
23 |
1.6% |
0.01605024 |
| 5 |
Very skeptical |
16 |
1.1% |
0.01116539 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.8% |
0.00837404 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
21 |
|
NA |
p11_repgrx_4
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would you be skeptical about including the following
people in a labor-intensive group that will promote an important issue
in your chosen body: An elected representative in their first term.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine [p11_repgrx_ran1] a working group of 4 representatives that will
promote an important issue in your chosen body. The group must meet
physically at [p11_repgrx_ran2] at least 2 times a week for a period of
3-4 months. To what extent would you be skeptical about including the
following people in such a labor-intensive group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
An elected representative in their first term.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,6,7,8,11)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not skeptical at all |
726 |
50.7% |
0.506629449 |
| 2 |
Slightly skeptical |
477 |
33.3% |
0.332868109 |
| 3 |
Somewhat skeptical |
161 |
11.2% |
0.112351710 |
| 4 |
Quite skeptical |
47 |
3.3% |
0.032798325 |
| 5 |
Very skeptical |
10 |
0.7% |
0.006978367 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.8% |
0.008374040 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
21 |
|
NA |
p11_repgrx_5
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would you be skeptical about including the following
people in a labor-intensive group that will promote an important issue
in your chosen body: An elected representative [p11_repgrx_ran3].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine [p11_repgrx_ran1] a working group of 4 representatives that will
promote an important issue in your chosen body. The group must meet
physically at [p11_repgrx_ran2] at least 2 times a week for a period of
3-4 months. To what extent would you be skeptical about including the
following people in such a labor-intensive group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
An elected representative [p11_repgrx_ran3].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,6,7,8,11)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not skeptical at all |
672 |
46.9% |
0.46894627 |
| 2 |
Slightly skeptical |
449 |
31.3% |
0.31332868 |
| 3 |
Somewhat skeptical |
201 |
14.0% |
0.14026518 |
| 4 |
Quite skeptical |
73 |
5.1% |
0.05094208 |
| 5 |
Very skeptical |
26 |
1.8% |
0.01814375 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.8% |
0.00837404 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
21 |
|
NA |
p11_enhydx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [p11_enhydx].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
"Green hydrogen," which is produced from electricity generated by renewable
hydropower from the grid, which essentially involves no CO2 emissions. |
469 |
32.3% |
0.3225585 |
| 2 |
"Green hydrogen," which is produced from electricity generated by renewable wind
power from wind turbines either on land or offshore, which essentially involves
no CO2 emissions. |
497 |
34.2% |
0.3418157 |
| 3 |
"Blue hydrogen," which is produced from natural gas, which involves CO2
emissions, but where 90-95% of the CO2 emissions will be stored beneath the
seabed on the continental shelf (so-called carbon capture and storage). |
488 |
33.6% |
0.3356259 |
p11_enhydx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [p11_enhydx].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The hydrogen that is produced will primarily be used to help reduce CO2
emissions domestically. |
795 |
54.7% |
0.5467675 |
| 2 |
The hydrogen that is produced will primarily be exported to help reduce CO2
emissions abroad. |
659 |
45.3% |
0.4532325 |
p11_enhydx
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you support the state in funding this hydrogen
initiative?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway aims to develop a hydrogen industry with no or low greenhouse
gas emissions. For hydrogen to become a competitive alternative to
fossil energy, it is relevant for the state to support the industry
financially.
Imagine that Norway will invest in so-called [p11_enhydx_ran1]
[p11_enhydx_ran2].
To what extent do you support that the state contributes to financing
this hydrogen investment?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
r31_enhydx
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
210 |
14.4% |
0.14442916 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
363 |
25.0% |
0.24965612 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
456 |
31.4% |
0.31361761 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
239 |
16.4% |
0.16437414 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
171 |
11.8% |
0.11760660 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
1.0% |
0.01031637 |
p11_poabo
|
Variable label:
|
Where do you personally think the line should be drawn in respect of
when it should be legal to have a self-determined abortion in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On 23 August 2024 the government published a draft of a new Abortion
Act, designed to extend the rights of women to self-determined abortion
from week 12 to week 18. There will be a vote in the Storting about this
draft on new Abortion Act.
Where do you personally think the line should be drawn in respect of
when it should be legal to have a self-determined abortion in Norway?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
More than 22 weeks |
51 |
3.5% |
0.035075653 |
| 2 |
22 weeks |
94 |
6.5% |
0.064649243 |
| 3 |
18 weeks (as in the draft) |
684 |
47.0% |
0.470426410 |
| 4 |
12 weeks (as at present) |
482 |
33.1% |
0.331499312 |
| 5 |
Less than 12 weeks |
32 |
2.2% |
0.022008253 |
| 6 |
Abortion should not be allowed at all |
35 |
2.4% |
0.024071527 |
| 7 |
Not sure |
65 |
4.5% |
0.044704264 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007565337 |
p11_povof
|
Variable label:
|
Should the parties allow their representatives to vote freely about the
new Abortion Act?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The parties in the Storting can allow their representatives to vote
as they wish on draft legislation that concerns matters of conscience.
Amending the Abortion Act may be one such matter.
Should the parties allow their representatives to vote freely about the
new Abortion Act?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1210 |
83.2% |
0.832187070 |
| 2 |
No |
145 |
10.0% |
0.099724897 |
| 3 |
Not sure |
86 |
5.9% |
0.059147180 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.008940853 |
p11_poval
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think parliamentary politicians should pay the most
attention to when voting on the draft to change the Abortion Act?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think parliamentary politicians should pay the most
attention to when voting on the draft to change the Abortion Act?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,10,11)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Own opinion |
753 |
52.4% |
0.52437326 |
| 2 |
Party and the party’s position |
408 |
28.4% |
0.28412256 |
| 3 |
The party’s electoral group |
251 |
17.5% |
0.17479109 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.7% |
0.01671309 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
18 |
|
NA |
p11_povab
|
Variable label:
|
Should your party allow its representatives to vote freely on the new
abortion law?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should your party allow its representatives to vote freely on the new
abortion law?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 4,9)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
14 |
77.8% |
0.77777778 |
| 2 |
No |
3 |
16.7% |
0.16666667 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1436 |
|
NA |
p11_povac
|
Variable label:
|
What will you consider most when voting on the proposal to change the
abortion law?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What will you consider most when voting on the proposal to change the
abortion law?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_povab = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Personal view |
11 |
78.6% |
0.7857143 |
| 2 |
The party and the party's position |
3 |
21.4% |
0.2142857 |
| 3 |
The party's voter group |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1440 |
|
NA |
p11_dmpce
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Authorities should be able to censor media that are too
critical of the authorities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
The authorities should be able to censor media that are too critical of
the authorities.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Displayed in random order with [p11_dmpop], [p11_dmpvr], [p11_dmper],
[p11_dmpgc], [p11_dmpgo], [p11_dmpbl].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002063274 |
| 2 |
Agree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002063274 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
10 |
0.7% |
0.006877579 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
14 |
1.0% |
0.009628611 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
19 |
1.3% |
0.013067400 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
214 |
14.7% |
0.147180193 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1173 |
80.7% |
0.806740028 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.2% |
0.012379642 |
p11_dmpop
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Norway would be better off if there was only one
political party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
Norway would be better off if there was only one political party.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Displayed in random order with [p11_dmpce], [p11_dmpvr], [p11_dmper],
[p11_dmpgc], [p11_dmpgo], [p11_dmpbl].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002063274 |
| 2 |
Agree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002063274 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
12 |
0.8% |
0.008253095 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
15 |
1.0% |
0.010316369 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
10 |
0.7% |
0.006877579 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
128 |
8.8% |
0.088033012 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1261 |
86.7% |
0.867262724 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.5% |
0.015130674 |
p11_dmpvr
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: There are so many people who do not know anything about
politics, that maybe the right to vote should not be available to
everyone.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
There are so many people who do not know anything about politics, that
maybe the right to vote should not be available to everyone.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Displayed in random order with [p11_dmpce], [p11_dmpop], [p11_dmper],
[p11_dmpgc], [p11_dmpgo], [p11_dmpbl].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
10 |
0.7% |
0.006877579 |
| 2 |
Agree |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007565337 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
52 |
3.6% |
0.035763411 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
29 |
2.0% |
0.019944979 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
43 |
3.0% |
0.029573590 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
247 |
17.0% |
0.169876204 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1037 |
71.3% |
0.713204952 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.7% |
0.017193948 |
p11_dmper
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Governments should be allowed to amend electoral rules
(e.g. the distribution of parliamentary mandates) to their advantage if
their opponents have also done the same previously.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
Governments should be allowed to amend electoral rules (e.g. the
distribution of parliamentary mandates) to their advantage if their
opponents have also done the same previously.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Displayed in random order with [p11_dmpce], [p11_dmpop], [p11_dmpvr],
[p11_dmpgc], [p11_dmpgo], [p11_dmpbl].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007565337 |
| 2 |
Agree |
17 |
1.2% |
0.011691884 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
32 |
2.2% |
0.022008253 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
88 |
6.1% |
0.060522696 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
61 |
4.2% |
0.041953232 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
278 |
19.1% |
0.191196699 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
946 |
65.1% |
0.650618982 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.4% |
0.014442916 |
p11_dmpgc
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The government should be able to oppose decisions made
by the Supreme Court that have a political bias.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
The government should be able to oppose decisions made by the Supreme
Court that have a political bias.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Displayed in random order with [p11_dmpce], [p11_dmpop], [p11_dmpvr],
[p11_dmper], [p11_dmpgo], [p11_dmpbl].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
35 |
2.4% |
0.02407153 |
| 2 |
Agree |
54 |
3.7% |
0.03713893 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
92 |
6.3% |
0.06327373 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
126 |
8.7% |
0.08665750 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
107 |
7.4% |
0.07359010 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
318 |
21.9% |
0.21870702 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
693 |
47.7% |
0.47661623 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
2.0% |
0.01994498 |
p11_dmpgo
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: It should be possible for the Storting to be overridden
by the government if it hampers the government’s work.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
It should be possible for the Storting to be overridden by the
government if it hampers the government’s work.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Displayed in random order with [p11_dmpce], [p11_dmpop], [p11_dmpvr],
[p11_dmper], [p11_dmpgc], [p11_dmpbl].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
10 |
0.7% |
0.006877579 |
| 2 |
Agree |
18 |
1.2% |
0.012379642 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
65 |
4.5% |
0.044704264 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
74 |
5.1% |
0.050894085 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
63 |
4.3% |
0.043328748 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
317 |
21.8% |
0.218019257 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
883 |
60.7% |
0.607290234 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.7% |
0.016506190 |
p11_dmpbl
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The government should be able to bend legislation in
order to resolve critical social and political challenges.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
The government should be able to bend legislation in order to resolve
critical social and political challenges.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Displayed in random order with [p11_dmpce], [p11_dmpop], [p11_dmpvr],
[p11_dmper], [p11_dmpgc], [p11_dmpgo].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
23 |
1.6% |
0.01581843 |
| 2 |
Agree |
71 |
4.9% |
0.04883081 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
219 |
15.1% |
0.15061898 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
79 |
5.4% |
0.05433287 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
148 |
10.2% |
0.10178817 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
410 |
28.2% |
0.28198074 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
482 |
33.1% |
0.33149931 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.5% |
0.01513067 |
p11_dmpos_order
|
Variable label:
|
The order in which [p11_dmpce], [p11_dmpop], [p11_dmpvr], [p11_dmper],
[p11_dmpgc], [p11_dmpgo], and [p11_dmpbl] was exposed to the respondent.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1443] [Invalid:11]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_religion1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects religion for candidate A in [p11_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_religion2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects religion for candidate B in [p11_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_innvandring1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects immigration status for candidate A in
[p11_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_innvandring2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects immigration status for candidate B in
[p11_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_alder1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects age for candidate A in [p11_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_alder2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects age for candidate B in [p11_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_utd1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects education level for candidate A in
[p11_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_utd2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects education level for candidate B in
[p11_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_gender1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects gender for candidate A in [p11_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_gender2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects gender for candidate B in [p11_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_polerfaring1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects political experience for candidate A in
[p11_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_polerfaring2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects political experience for candidate B in
[p11_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_rerandomize
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Technical details on re-randomisation of
[p11_poelex]-variables if it was necessary.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[If there was a necessity to re-randomise information for one of the
candidates in [p11_poelex], the information is stored here.]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_roworder
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. The random order of attributes shown in the table in
[p11_poelex]. Sets the subject’s rowwise placement, sorted by subject.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[If the first number is 2, it means that subject 1 (“religion”) was
displayed in row number 2. If the second number is 4, it means that
subject 1 (“immigration status”) was displayed in row number 4, etc..
For the sequential order, sorted by rownumber, see
[p11_poelex_roworder_seq].
1 = Religion. 2 = immigration status. 3 = Age. 4 = Education level. 5
= Gender. 6 = Political experience.]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex_roworder_seq
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. The random order of attributes shown in the table in
[p11_poelex]. Set sequentially, sorted by rownumber.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[The first number in the array shows what category was displayed in
the first row, while the next number shows what category was shown in
the second row etc.. 1 = Religion. 2 = immigration status. 3 = Age. 4 =
Education level. 5 = Gender. 6 = Political experience.]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelex
|
Variable label:
|
Preferred mayoral candidate
|
|
Literal question:
|
We are interested in knowing which leaders voters want to represent
them in the municipal elections. Please read carefully through the
descriptions of two possible mayoral candidates and evaluate which of
the two you prefer. Both are candidates from the party you would
consider voting for:
Candidate A [p11_poelex_religion1] [p11_poelex_innvandring1]
[p11_poelex_alder1] [p11_poelex_utd1] [p11_poelex_gender1]
[p11_poelex_polerfaring1]
Candidate B [p11_poelex_religion2] [p11_poelex_innvandring2]
[p11_poelex_alder2] [p11_poelex_utd2] [p11_poelex_gender2]
[p11_poelex_polerfaring2]
Based on this information, which mayoral candidate do you prefer?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
r31_poelex
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[The respondents were shown the attributes listet in
[p11_poelex_religion1/2] - [p11_poelex_polerfaring1/2] in a table.]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelnx_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate: Appeal to core voters (reliable
voters)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Appeal to core voters (reliable voters)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelnx_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate: Appeal to voters who may consider
voting for the party (unsure voters)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Appeal to voters who may consider voting for the party (unsure voters)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelnx_3
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate: Ability to unite the party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Ability to unite the party
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelnx_4
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate: Ability to collaborate across party
lines
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Ability to collaborate across party lines
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelnx_5
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate: Visibility in the media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Visibility in the media
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelnx_6
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_poelnx_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important do you think the following criteria are when parties
nominate their mayoral candidate?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_repno
|
Variable label:
|
Have you ever served on a political party’s nomination committee?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you ever served on a political party’s nomination committee?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level1 = 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,11 )]
[80% of data withheld. Contact DIGSSCORE for more information..]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_reppa
|
Variable label:
|
In your opinion, how difficult is it to combine being a successful
politician with being a parent of small children?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how difficult is it to combine being a successful
politician with being a parent of small children?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 5 |
5 - Very difficult |
138 |
9.5% |
0.09491059 |
| 4 |
4 |
545 |
37.5% |
0.37482806 |
| 3 |
3 |
528 |
36.3% |
0.36313618 |
| 2 |
2 |
159 |
10.9% |
0.10935351 |
| 1 |
1 - Not difficult at all |
44 |
3.0% |
0.03026135 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.8% |
0.02751032 |
p11_pohpqx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [p11_pohpqx].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1421] [Invalid:33]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Anna Pedersen is 40 years old, is a qualified nurse and has worked for 8 years
in the health sector. She has recently become a party member, but has not
previously held political office. |
294 |
20.7% |
0.2068966 |
| 2 |
Anna Pedersen is 40 years old, is a qualified doctor and has worked for 8
years in the health sector. She has recently become a party member, but has not
previously held political office. |
283 |
19.9% |
0.1991555 |
| 3 |
Anna Pedersen is 40 years old. After secondary school she worked for a
kindergarten. She has always been politically active and has been the mayor of
her home municipality for the past 8 years. |
292 |
20.5% |
0.2054891 |
| 4 |
Anna Pedersen is 40 years old. After secondary school she worked for a
kindergarten. She has always been politically active and has been a political
adviser at the party office in Oslo for the last 8 years. |
267 |
18.8% |
0.1878958 |
| 5 |
Anna Pedersen is 40 years old, is a qualified nurse and has worked for 8 years
in the health sector. She has always been politically active and has been the
mayor of her home municipality for the past 8 years. |
285 |
20.1% |
0.2005630 |
| Sysmiss |
|
33 |
|
NA |
p11_pohpqx_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think Anna Pedersen is suitable as: Parliamentary
politician on the Standing Committee on Health and Care Services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a fictional person who is relevant for several political
positions.
[r31_pohpqx_ran]
To what extent do you think Anna Pedersen would be suitable as:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Parliamentary politician on the Standing Committee on Health and Care
Services
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
r31_pohpqx_1, f6_pohpqx_1
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very low degree |
53 |
3.6% |
0.03645117 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
131 |
9.0% |
0.09009629 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
386 |
26.5% |
0.26547455 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
559 |
38.4% |
0.38445667 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
277 |
19.1% |
0.19050894 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
3.3% |
0.03301238 |
p11_pohpqx_2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think Anna Pedersen is suitable as: Minister of
Health and Care Services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a fictional person who is relevant for several political
positions.
[r31_pohpqx_ran]
To what extent do you think Anna Pedersen would be suitable as:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Minister of Health and Care Services
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
r31_pohpqx_2, f6_pohpqx_2
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very low degree |
232 |
16.0% |
0.15955983 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
308 |
21.2% |
0.21182944 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
470 |
32.3% |
0.32324622 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
274 |
18.8% |
0.18844567 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
119 |
8.2% |
0.08184319 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
3.5% |
0.03507565 |
p11_pohpqx_3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think Anna Pedersen is suitable as: Political
Adviser in the Ministry of Health and Care Services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a fictional person who is relevant for several political
positions.
[r31_pohpqx_ran]
To what extent do you think Anna Pedersen would be suitable as:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political Adviser in the Ministry of Health and Care Services
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
r31_pohpqx_3, f6_pohpqx_3
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very low degree |
84 |
5.8% |
0.05777166 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
158 |
10.9% |
0.10866575 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
425 |
29.2% |
0.29229711 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
484 |
33.3% |
0.33287483 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
258 |
17.7% |
0.17744154 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
3.1% |
0.03094911 |
p11_pohpqx_back
|
Variable label:
|
Whether the respondent has navigated back to [r31_pohpqx].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:102] [Invalid:1352]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The respondent has navigated back to [r31_pohpqx] |
102 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1352 |
|
NA |
p11_pohpqxc
|
Variable label:
|
Do you remember where Anna Pedersen had work experience from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you remember where Anna Pedersen had work experience from?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
r31_pohpqxc, f6_pohpqxc
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The health sector |
870 |
59.8% |
0.59834938 |
| 2 |
Kindergarten |
547 |
37.6% |
0.37620358 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.5% |
0.02544704 |
p11_popspx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [p11_popsrx].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Imagine that you are a representative in a municipality where it has become
increasingly difficult for residents to find a parking space due to the rising
number of visitors to the town center. Consequently, local authorities have
decided that parking in the center is now only permitted with a parking permit
for residents. As a result, however, people who come to shop have increasingly
parked their vehicles outside the center, leading to problems as vehicles are
parked in and around green spaces and recreational areas. |
709 |
50.0% |
0.4996476 |
| 2 |
Imagine that to reduce CO2 emissions and address climate change, the state
subsidizes 30 percent of the cost to install solar panels. However, the
effectiveness of these subsidies is unclear. While the financial incentives
encourage greener choices, some homeowners still opt for cheaper alternatives
with lower energy efficiency. Additionally, others would have installed solar
panels even without these financial incentives. |
710 |
50.0% |
0.5003524 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popspx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Conditionally randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[p11_posprx].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
[There is 40% probability that the value is set to 1. There is 30%
probability that the value is set to 2. There is 30% probability that
the value is set to 3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
545 |
38.4% |
0.3840733 |
| 2 |
There was a high level of political conflict surrounding this measure with
regard to the various needs and interests. |
430 |
30.3% |
0.3030303 |
| 3 |
There was no political conflict regarding this measure with respect to the
various needs and interests. |
444 |
31.3% |
0.3128964 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popspx_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Conditionally randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[p11_posprx]. If [p11_pospx_ran2] = 1 there is 50% probability that the
value is set to 1, 25% probability that the value is set to 2, and 25%
probability that the value is set to 3. If [p11_popspx_ran2] = 2, 3 the
value is randomly selected.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
[If [p11_popspx_ran2] = 1 there is 50% probability that the value is set
to 1, 25% probability that the value is set to 2, and 25% probability
that the value is set to 3. If [p11_popspx_ran2] = 2, 3 it is selected
at random.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
562 |
39.6% |
0.3960536 |
| 2 |
In the debate about [parking permits/subsidizing solar panels], no one doubted
that [the municipal administration had the capacity to manage the scheme/the
caseworkers had sufficient capacity]. |
446 |
31.4% |
0.3143058 |
| 3 |
In the debate about [parking permits/subsidizing solar panels], many doubted
that [the municipal administration had the capacity to manage the scheme/the
caseworkers had sufficient capacity]. |
411 |
29.0% |
0.2896406 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popspx_ran4
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If [p11_popspx_ran2] = 1 and [p11_popspx_ran3] = 1 the value
is randomly selected of 1 and 2. Else the value is set to 2.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
[If [p11_popspx_ran2] = 1 and [p11_popspx_ran3] = 1 the value is
randomly selected between 1 and 2. Else the value is set to 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In Europe, several countries, including France and Germany, have implemented
so-called 'one-in-one-out' rules. The goal of these rules is to abolish an
existing regulation each time the authorities introduce a new one, thereby
reducing the regulatory burden on citizens, businesses, and administration. |
143 |
10.1% |
0.1007752 |
| 2 |
BLANK |
1276 |
89.9% |
0.8992248 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popsrx_pipe
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [p11_popsrx] dependent
on the value in [p11_popspx_ran4]. If [p11_popspx_ran4] = 1 the value is
set to 2, else the value is set to 1.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [p11_popspx_ran4] = 1 the value is set to 2, else the value is set
to 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Which of the following options do you believe is the best political response to
the described situation? |
1276 |
89.9% |
0.8992248 |
| 2 |
Considering the principle that for every new regulation an existing regulation
must be removed (the so-called 'one-in-one-out'), which of the following options
do you believe is the best political response to the described situation? |
143 |
10.1% |
0.1007752 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popsrx_mask_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects answer alternatives for [p11_popsrx] dependent on
[p11_popspx_ran1]: Abolish the requirement for parking permits for
residents so that parking is again allowed for everyone.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Abolish the requirement for parking permits for residents so that
parking is again allowed for everyone.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [p11_popspx_ran1] = 1 alternatives 1, 2, 3, 4 are selected. If
[p11_popspx_ran1] = 2 alternatives 5, 6, 7, 8 are selected.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
709 |
50.0% |
0.4996476 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
710 |
50.0% |
0.5003524 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popsrx_mask_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects answer alternatives for [p11_popsrx] dependent on
[p11_popspx_ran1]: No reform (changes), accept the problems outside the
center.
|
|
Literal question:
|
No reform (changes), accept the problems outside the center.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [p11_popspx_ran1] = 1 alternatives 1, 2, 3, 4 are selected. If
[p11_popspx_ran1] = 2 alternatives 5, 6, 7, 8 are selected.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
709 |
50.0% |
0.4996476 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
710 |
50.0% |
0.5003524 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popsrx_mask_3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects answer alternatives for [p11_popsrx] dependent on
[p11_popspx_ran1]: Replace the requirement for parking permits for
residents with parking fees.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Replace the requirement for parking permits for residents with parking
fees.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [p11_popspx_ran1] = 1 alternatives 1, 2, 3, 4 are selected. If
[p11_popspx_ran1] = 2 alternatives 5, 6, 7, 8 are selected.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
709 |
50.0% |
0.4996476 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
710 |
50.0% |
0.5003524 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popsrx_mask_4
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects answer alternatives for [p11_popsrx] dependent on
[p11_popspx_ran1]: Prohibit parking in and around green spaces and
recreational areas, and establish new parking areas.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Prohibit parking in and around green spaces and recreational areas, and
establish new parking areas.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [p11_popspx_ran1] = 1 alternatives 1, 2, 3, 4 are selected. If
[p11_popspx_ran1] = 2 alternatives 5, 6, 7, 8 are selected.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
709 |
50.0% |
0.4996476 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
710 |
50.0% |
0.5003524 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popsrx_mask_5
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects answer alternatives for [p11_popsrx] dependent on
[p11_popspx_ran1]: Abolish the financial incentives
|
|
Literal question:
|
Abolish the financial incentives
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [p11_popspx_ran1] = 1 alternatives 1, 2, 3, 4 are selected. If
[p11_popspx_ran1] = 2 alternatives 5, 6, 7, 8 are selected.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
710 |
50.0% |
0.5003524 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
709 |
50.0% |
0.4996476 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popsrx_mask_6
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects answer alternatives for [p11_popsrx] dependent on
[p11_popspx_ran1]: No reform (changes), accept the issue of potentially
ineffective subsidies.
|
|
Literal question:
|
No reform (changes), accept the issue of potentially ineffective
subsidies.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [p11_popspx_ran1] = 1 alternatives 1, 2, 3, 4 are selected. If
[p11_popspx_ran1] = 2 alternatives 5, 6, 7, 8 are selected.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
710 |
50.0% |
0.5003524 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
709 |
50.0% |
0.4996476 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popsrx_mask_7
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects answer alternatives for [p11_popsrx] dependent on
[p11_popspx_ran1]: Replace financial incentives with a requirement to
install solar panels on designated roof areas.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Replace financial incentives with a requirement to install solar panels
on designated roof areas.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [p11_popspx_ran1] = 1 alternatives 1, 2, 3, 4 are selected. If
[p11_popspx_ran1] = 2 alternatives 5, 6, 7, 8 are selected.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
710 |
50.0% |
0.5003524 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
709 |
50.0% |
0.4996476 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popsrx_mask_8
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects answer alternatives for [p11_popsrx] dependent on
[p11_popspx_ran1]:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Combine financial incentives with other requirements for installing
solar panels, e.g., a minimum standard for energy efficiency.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [p11_popspx_ran1] = 1 alternatives 1, 2, 3, 4 are selected. If
[p11_popspx_ran1] = 2 alternatives 5, 6, 7, 8 are selected.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1419] [Invalid:35]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
710 |
50.0% |
0.5003524 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
709 |
50.0% |
0.4996476 |
| Sysmiss |
|
35 |
|
NA |
p11_popsrx
|
Variable label:
|
Political response to a problem on parking permits or solar cells
|
|
Literal question:
|
[p11_popspx_ran1]
[p11_popspx_ran2] [p11_popspx_ran3] [p11_popspx_ran4]
[p11_popsrx_pipe]
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list based on response in f(‘p11_popsrx_mask’);]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Abolish the requirement for parking permits for residents so that parking is
again allowed for everyone. |
123 |
8.5% |
0.08459422 |
| 2 |
No reform (changes), accept the problems outside the center. |
50 |
3.4% |
0.03438790 |
| 3 |
Replace the requirement for parking permits for residents with parking fees. |
162 |
11.1% |
0.11141678 |
| 4 |
Prohibit parking in and around green spaces and recreational areas, and
establish new parking areas. |
366 |
25.2% |
0.25171939 |
| 5 |
Abolish the financial incentives |
104 |
7.2% |
0.07152682 |
| 6 |
No reform (changes), accept the issue of potentially ineffective subsidies. |
115 |
7.9% |
0.07909216 |
| 7 |
Replace financial incentives with a requirement to install solar panels on
designated roof areas. |
24 |
1.7% |
0.01650619 |
| 8 |
Combine financial incentives with other requirements for installing solar
panels, e.g., a minimum standard for energy efficiency. |
451 |
31.0% |
0.31017882 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
4.1% |
0.04057772 |
p11_popsmx_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement: I believe that
the political level of conflict in this specific situation was high.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I believe that the political level of conflict in this specific
situation was high.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 5 |
Strongly agree |
111 |
7.6% |
0.07634113 |
| 4 |
Agree |
674 |
46.4% |
0.46354883 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
433 |
29.8% |
0.29779917 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
144 |
9.9% |
0.09903714 |
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
22 |
1.5% |
0.01513067 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
70 |
4.8% |
0.04814305 |
p11_popsmx_2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement: I believe that
there was sufficient capacity to implement the policy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I believe that there was sufficient capacity to implement the policy.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 5 |
Strongly agree |
43 |
3.0% |
0.029573590 |
| 4 |
Agree |
548 |
37.7% |
0.376891334 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
627 |
43.1% |
0.431224209 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
144 |
9.9% |
0.099037139 |
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
0.8% |
0.008253095 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
80 |
5.5% |
0.055020633 |
p11_popsmx_3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement: The problem
involved solar panels.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The problem involved solar panels.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 5 |
Strongly agree |
135 |
9.3% |
0.09284732 |
| 4 |
Agree |
239 |
16.4% |
0.16437414 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
456 |
31.4% |
0.31361761 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
197 |
13.5% |
0.13548831 |
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
336 |
23.1% |
0.23108666 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
91 |
6.3% |
0.06258597 |
p11_popsmx_4
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement: A greater
extent of regulations is an increasing problem.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
A greater extent of regulations is an increasing problem.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 5 |
Strongly agree |
254 |
17.5% |
0.17469051 |
| 4 |
Agree |
522 |
35.9% |
0.35900963 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
414 |
28.5% |
0.28473177 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
147 |
10.1% |
0.10110041 |
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
39 |
2.7% |
0.02682256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
78 |
5.4% |
0.05364512 |
p11_fawki
|
Variable label:
|
How much do you agree with the following statement? “A child of
preschool age is likely to suffer if the mother is employed.”
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree with the following statement?
“A child of preschool age is likely to suffer if the mother is
employed.”
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
15 |
1.0% |
0.01031637 |
| 2 |
Agree |
28 |
1.9% |
0.01925722 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
119 |
8.2% |
0.08184319 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
84 |
5.8% |
0.05777166 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
74 |
5.1% |
0.05089409 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
411 |
28.3% |
0.28266850 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
675 |
46.4% |
0.46423659 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
3.3% |
0.03301238 |
p11_bgchh
|
Variable label:
|
Do you have children (biological children, stepchildren, adopted
children, foster children, children from a partner, etc.)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children (biological children, stepchildren, adopted
children, foster children, children from a partner, etc.)?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1205 |
82.9% |
0.82874828 |
| 2 |
No |
204 |
14.0% |
0.14030261 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
3.1% |
0.03094911 |
p11_bgchm
|
Variable label:
|
How many children do you have?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many children do you have?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_bgchh = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
129 |
10.7% |
0.1070539419 |
| 2 |
2 |
488 |
40.5% |
0.4049792531 |
| 3 |
3 |
385 |
32.0% |
0.3195020747 |
| 4 |
4 |
139 |
11.5% |
0.1153526971 |
| 5 |
5+ |
63 |
5.2% |
0.0522821577 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008298755 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
249 |
|
NA |
p11_bgchy
|
Variable label:
|
What is the age of the youngest child?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the age of the youngest child?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_bgchh = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 – 3 years |
58 |
4.8% |
0.048132780 |
| 2 |
4 – 6 years |
30 |
2.5% |
0.024896266 |
| 3 |
7 – 12 years |
129 |
10.7% |
0.107053942 |
| 4 |
13 – 17 years |
160 |
13.3% |
0.132780083 |
| 5 |
18 years or older |
822 |
68.2% |
0.682157676 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.004979253 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
249 |
|
NA |
p11_bgdayr_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Best description last 7 days
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last seven days? (disregard holiday)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_bgdayr]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In paid work, as a politician or other (or temporarily absent, e.g. on leave) |
162 |
61.1% |
0.611320755 |
| 2 |
Self-employed |
25 |
9.4% |
0.094339623 |
| 3 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
3 |
1.1% |
0.011320755 |
| 4 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 5 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003773585 |
| 6 |
Long-term sick leave, AAP, or disability benefit |
5 |
1.9% |
0.018867925 |
| 7 |
Retired |
41 |
15.5% |
0.154716981 |
| 8 |
In military service |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 9 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 10 |
Other: |
12 |
4.5% |
0.045283019 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
6.0% |
0.060377358 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1189 |
|
NA |
p11_bgdayr_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Best description last 7 days: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What fits best with what you have done in the last seven days?
(disregard holiday)
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_bgdayr]]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:1454] [Range:-]
|
p11_bgurb
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_bgurb],
[p9k2_bgurb], [p8perurban]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
7 |
7.0% |
0.07 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
9 |
9.0% |
0.09 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
27 |
27.0% |
0.27 |
| 4 |
A village |
32 |
32.0% |
0.32 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
21 |
21.0% |
0.21 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
4.0% |
0.04 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1354 |
|
NA |
p11_bgciv_raw
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your marital status? Select the most appropriate.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_bgciv]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
24 |
7.6% |
0.075949367 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
11 |
3.5% |
0.034810127 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
39 |
12.3% |
0.123417722 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
197 |
62.3% |
0.623417722 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/former legally registered partner |
17 |
5.4% |
0.053797468 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
9 |
2.8% |
0.028481013 |
| 7 |
Other: |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003164557 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
5.7% |
0.056962025 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1138 |
|
NA |
p11_bgciv_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your marital status? Click on the one that fits best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_bgciv]]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:1454] [Range:-]
|
p11_bglrs
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political left/right-scale
|
|
Literal question:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right
wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left
politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_bglrs],
[p9k2_bglrs], [p8perleftright]]
[The respondent answered using a slider.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:105] [Invalid:1349]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 – Left wing |
1 |
1.0% |
0.00952381 |
| 1 |
1 |
8 |
7.6% |
0.07619048 |
| 2 |
2 |
12 |
11.4% |
0.11428571 |
| 3 |
3 |
13 |
12.4% |
0.12380952 |
| 4 |
4 |
16 |
15.2% |
0.15238095 |
| 5 |
5 |
10 |
9.5% |
0.09523810 |
| 6 |
6 |
12 |
11.4% |
0.11428571 |
| 7 |
7 |
10 |
9.5% |
0.09523810 |
| 8 |
8 |
16 |
15.2% |
0.15238095 |
| 9 |
9 |
4 |
3.8% |
0.03809524 |
| 10 |
10 – Right wing |
3 |
2.9% |
0.02857143 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1349 |
|
NA |
p11_repam_pipe
|
Variable label:
|
Textpiping. Selects an element for [p11_repam] based on
[p11_remem_level1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [p11_remem_level1] = 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 the value is set to 1. Else
the value is set to 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:296] [Invalid:1158]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
stood for election for in 2023 |
236 |
79.7% |
0.7972973 |
| 2 |
is elected for now |
60 |
20.3% |
0.2027027 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1158 |
|
NA |
p11_repam
|
Variable label:
|
What year did you become a member of party/list?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What year did you become a member of the party/list you
[p11_repam_pipe]?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_repam]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:97-2023]
|
p11_reepe_pipe1
|
Variable label:
|
Textpiping. Selects an element for [p11_reepe] based on
[p11_remem_level1].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [p11_remem_level1] = 1, 6 the value is set to 1. If
[p11_remem_level1] = 2, 7 the value is set to 2. If [p11_remem_level1] =
3, 8 the value is set to 3. If [p11_remem_level1] = 4, 9 the value is
set to 5. If [p11_remem_level1] = 5, 10 the value is set to 5. If
[p11_remem_level1] = 11 the value is set to 6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:236] [Invalid:1218]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in the district committee |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01271186 |
| 2 |
in the municipal council |
218 |
92.4% |
0.92372881 |
| 3 |
at the county council |
8 |
3.4% |
0.03389831 |
| 4 |
at the Storting |
7 |
3.0% |
0.02966102 |
| 5 |
at the Sami Parliament |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1218 |
|
NA |
p11_reepe_pipe2
|
Variable label:
|
Textpiping. Selects an element for [p11_reepe2] based on
[p11_remem_level2].
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [p11_remem_level2] = 1 the value is set to 1. If [p11_remem_level2]
= 2 the value is set to 2. If [p11_remem_level2] = 3 the value is set to
3. If [p11_remem_level2] = 4 the value is set to 4. If
[p11_remem_level2] = 5 the value is set to 5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:18] [Invalid:1436]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in the district committee |
2 |
11.1% |
0.11111111 |
| 2 |
in the municipal council |
1 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
| 3 |
at the county council |
15 |
83.3% |
0.83333333 |
| 4 |
at the Storting |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 5 |
at the Sami Parliament |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1436 |
|
NA |
p11_reepe
|
Variable label:
|
How many full terms as elected?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many full terms have you been elected [p11_reepe_pipe1]?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (if the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_reepe]
p11_remem_level1 != 11)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
9 |
3.6% |
0.03585657 |
| 1 |
1 |
42 |
16.7% |
0.16733068 |
| 2 |
2 |
59 |
23.5% |
0.23505976 |
| 3 |
3 |
52 |
20.7% |
0.20717131 |
| 4 |
4 |
28 |
11.2% |
0.11155378 |
| 5 |
5 |
17 |
6.8% |
0.06772908 |
| 6 |
6 |
9 |
3.6% |
0.03585657 |
| 7 |
7 |
5 |
2.0% |
0.01992032 |
| 8 |
8 or more |
15 |
6.0% |
0.05976096 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
6.0% |
0.05976096 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1203 |
|
NA |
p11_reepe2
|
Variable label:
|
How many full terms as elected?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many full terms have you been elected [p11_reepe_pipe2]?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (p11_remem_level2 = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) & (if the respondent
has not been exposed to [p10_reepe2] p11_remem_level1 != 11)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
4 |
21.1% |
0.21052632 |
| 1 |
1 |
9 |
47.4% |
0.47368421 |
| 2 |
2 |
4 |
21.1% |
0.21052632 |
| 3 |
3 |
1 |
5.3% |
0.05263158 |
| 4 |
4 |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 5 |
5 |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 6 |
6 |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 7 |
7 |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 8 |
8 or more |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
5.3% |
0.05263158 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1435 |
|
NA |
p11_reftp
|
Variable label:
|
Full-time politician?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you a full-time politician?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_reftp]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
31 |
11.9% |
0.1187739 |
| 2 |
No |
213 |
81.6% |
0.8160920 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
6.5% |
0.0651341 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1193 |
|
NA |
p11_repay
|
Variable label:
|
Paid position as politician
|
|
Literal question:
|
[Is/Was] your position as a politician paid in addition to the meeting
allowance[/ during your last period]? Please answer in percentage as
paid position.
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_repay] and
!p11_remem_level1 = 4, 9 & p11_remem_level2 is not answered)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:465] [Invalid:989]
[Range:0-100]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
272 |
58.5% |
0.584946237 |
| 1 |
|
11 |
2.4% |
0.023655914 |
| 2 |
|
17 |
3.7% |
0.036559140 |
| 3 |
|
5 |
1.1% |
0.010752688 |
| 4 |
|
3 |
0.6% |
0.006451613 |
| 5 |
|
20 |
4.3% |
0.043010753 |
| 7 |
|
5 |
1.1% |
0.010752688 |
| 8 |
|
7 |
1.5% |
0.015053763 |
| 9 |
|
2 |
0.4% |
0.004301075 |
| 10 |
|
23 |
4.9% |
0.049462366 |
| 12 |
|
6 |
1.3% |
0.012903226 |
| 14 |
|
3 |
0.6% |
0.006451613 |
| 15 |
|
3 |
0.6% |
0.006451613 |
| 17 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.002150538 |
| 19 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.002150538 |
| 20 |
|
14 |
3.0% |
0.030107527 |
| 21 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.002150538 |
| 25 |
|
2 |
0.4% |
0.004301075 |
| 29 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.002150538 |
| 30 |
|
11 |
2.4% |
0.023655914 |
| 40 |
|
7 |
1.5% |
0.015053763 |
| 50 |
|
5 |
1.1% |
0.010752688 |
| 56 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.002150538 |
| 60 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.002150538 |
| 70 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.002150538 |
| 75 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.002150538 |
| 80 |
|
4 |
0.9% |
0.008602151 |
| 85 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.002150538 |
| 95 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.002150538 |
| 97 |
|
1 |
0.2% |
0.002150538 |
| 100 |
|
34 |
7.3% |
0.073118280 |
| Sysmiss |
|
989 |
|
NA |
p11_rerel
|
Variable label:
|
Re-election next term
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have ambitions to stand for re-election next term?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (the respondent has not been exposed to [p10_rerel] and
p11_remem_level1 != 11)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
75 |
29.2% |
0.29182879 |
| 2 |
No |
86 |
33.5% |
0.33463035 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
80 |
31.1% |
0.31128405 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
6.2% |
0.06225681 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1197 |
|
NA |
p11_bggen
|
Variable label:
|
Registered gender
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your registered gender?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not answered questions on registered
gender in previous waves]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_bgyob
|
Variable label:
|
What year were you born?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What year were you born?
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent has not answered questions on year of birth
in previous waves]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_avslutt
|
Variable label:
|
Closing comments
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:1454]
[Range:-]
|
p11_P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
937 |
64.4% |
0.6444292 |
| 2 |
Female |
517 |
35.6% |
0.3555708 |
p11_P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region where the representative is elected
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
37 |
2.5% |
0.02544704 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
648 |
44.6% |
0.44566713 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
91 |
6.3% |
0.06258597 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
394 |
27.1% |
0.27097662 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
101 |
6.9% |
0.06946355 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
168 |
11.6% |
0.11554333 |
| 99 |
Not relevant |
15 |
1.0% |
0.01031637 |
p11_P3
|
Variable label:
|
County where the representative is elected
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1440] [Invalid:14]
[Range:3-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
37 |
2.6% |
0.0256944444 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
118 |
8.2% |
0.0819444444 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
108 |
7.5% |
0.0750000000 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
90 |
6.2% |
0.0625000000 |
| 31 |
Østfold |
56 |
3.9% |
0.0388888889 |
| 32 |
Akershus |
193 |
13.4% |
0.1340277778 |
| 33 |
Buskerud |
82 |
5.7% |
0.0569444444 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
169 |
11.7% |
0.1173611111 |
| 39 |
Vestfold |
62 |
4.3% |
0.0430555556 |
| 40 |
Telemark |
86 |
6.0% |
0.0597222222 |
| 42 |
Agder |
91 |
6.3% |
0.0631944444 |
| 46 |
Vestlandet |
168 |
11.7% |
0.1166666667 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
101 |
7.0% |
0.0701388889 |
| 55 |
Troms |
49 |
3.4% |
0.0340277778 |
| 56 |
Finnmark |
29 |
2.0% |
0.0201388889 |
| 99 |
Not relevant |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006944444 |
| Sysmiss |
|
14 |
|
NA |
p11_P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education (condensed)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
21 |
1.4% |
0.01444292 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
345 |
23.7% |
0.23727648 |
| 3 |
University/University College |
1060 |
72.9% |
0.72902338 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.9% |
0.01925722 |
p11_P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education (expanded)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006877579 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
20 |
1.4% |
0.0137551582 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
90 |
6.2% |
0.0618982118 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
138 |
9.5% |
0.0949105915 |
| 5 |
Craft training (e.g. vocational school, technical school/college, maritime
vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot training, secretary school,
home industry school/handicrafts school, master craftsman certificate training) |
117 |
8.0% |
0.0804676754 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
170 |
11.7% |
0.1169188446 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
322 |
22.1% |
0.2214580468 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
126 |
8.7% |
0.0866574966 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
141 |
9.7% |
0.0969738652 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
273 |
18.8% |
0.1877579092 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
28 |
1.9% |
0.0192572215 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
8 |
0.6% |
0.0055020633 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.4% |
0.0137551582 |
p11_P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (expanded)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1445] [Invalid:9] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1949 or earlier |
88 |
6.1% |
0.06089965 |
| 2 |
1950-1959 |
337 |
23.3% |
0.23321799 |
| 3 |
1960-1969 |
444 |
30.7% |
0.30726644 |
| 4 |
1970-1979 |
323 |
22.4% |
0.22352941 |
| 5 |
1980-1989 |
145 |
10.0% |
0.10034602 |
| 6 |
1990 or later |
108 |
7.5% |
0.07474048 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9 |
|
NA |
p11_P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (condensed)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1445] [Invalid:9] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
425 |
29.4% |
0.29411765 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
912 |
63.1% |
0.63114187 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
108 |
7.5% |
0.07474048 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9 |
|
NA |
p11_P5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (expanded, from 1959)
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1445] [Invalid:9] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
425 |
29.4% |
0.29411765 |
| 2 |
1960-1969 |
444 |
30.7% |
0.30726644 |
| 3 |
1970-1979 |
323 |
22.4% |
0.22352941 |
| 4 |
1980-1989 |
145 |
10.0% |
0.10034602 |
| 5 |
1990-1999 |
76 |
5.3% |
0.05259516 |
| 6 |
2000 or later |
32 |
2.2% |
0.02214533 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9 |
|
NA |
p11_P6
|
Variable label:
|
Administrative level to which the representative is elected
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Municipality |
1377 |
94.7% |
0.9470426410 |
| 2 |
County |
59 |
4.1% |
0.0405777166 |
| 3 |
Parliament |
17 |
1.2% |
0.0116918845 |
| 4 |
The Sami Parliament |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006877579 |
p11_P7
|
Variable label:
|
Party affiliation
|
|
Field period:
|
13.11.2024 - 16.12.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1454] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
48 |
3.3% |
0.03301238 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
114 |
7.8% |
0.07840440 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party |
358 |
24.6% |
0.24621733 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
201 |
13.8% |
0.13823934 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
55 |
3.8% |
0.03782669 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democrats |
69 |
4.7% |
0.04745530 |
| 7 |
The Liberal Party |
73 |
5.0% |
0.05020633 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party |
297 |
20.4% |
0.20426410 |
| 9 |
The Progress Party |
122 |
8.4% |
0.08390646 |
| 10 |
Other |
117 |
8.0% |
0.08046768 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
