Citation
Researchers responsible
|
Name
|
Affiliaton
|
|
Yvette Peters
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Troy Saghaug Broderstad
|
University of Bergen
|
|
Arjan Schakel
|
University of Bergen
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Panel of Elected Representatives is an internet-based survey of elected representatives, at all political levels, in Norway. The survey deals with matters that are important to society, representation and democracy. All elected politicians are invited to participate.
The Panel of Elected Representatives is part of the Digital Social Science Core Facility (DIGSSCORE) at the University of Bergen (UiB). The Panel of elected Representatives is also affiliated with the Norwegian citizen Panel, the Norwegian Journalist Panel, and the Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators. The University of Bergen is the owner and treatment manager of the Panel of Elected Representatives. Ideas2Evidence executes the practical implementation of the survey, and are responsible for recruting participants, as well as sending and receiving surveys to and from respondents. The data is stored encrypted and secure in UiB's infrastructure for for safe processing of sensitive personal data in research, ‘SAFE’. The panel has been reported to and processed by the Data Protection Official for Research at the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD) pursuant to the Personal Data Act. More information can be found at uib.no/NRP.
Scope
Geographic coverage: National.
Unit of analysis: Elected representatives.
Universe: All elected representatives in Norway.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Elected representatives at all political levels in Norway - municipal councils, county councils, the Storting (parliament) and the Sami Parliament of Norway - are invited to participate in the Panel of Elected Representatives. Contact information has been collected through Kommuneforlaget AS' registers, as well as public information from websites of municipalities, county municipalitites, the Storting, and the Sami Parliament of Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a online questionnaire where the panel members are invited by email. The panel members were recruited to the panel in wave 1, 3, 5, and 7. Note that recruitment in wave 3 was due to the 2019 municipal election. Representatives who were not re-elected were omitted from the panel, while newly elected and re-elected representatives where invited to participate. Recruitment in wave 7 was in the aftermath of the 2021 parliamentary election and recruited newly elected parliamentary representatives, in addition to recruiting current municipal and county representatives. Former parliamentary representatives who were not relected were omitted for the panel.
For a more detailed description of how the members were recruited, please see the documentation report from wave 1, 3, 5, and 7.
Wave 7 was fielded from 21st of January 2022 to the 1st of March 2022.
Change Log
No changes registred.
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
The Panel of Elected Representatives - round 7 - v-100-L.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Privileged
|
|
# Cases
|
2335
|
|
# Variables
|
159
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
p7rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
The wave the respondent was recruited
|
|
Technical description:
|
The wave the respondent was recruited
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
818 |
35% |
0.35032120 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
1026 |
43.9% |
0.43940043 |
| 5 |
Wave 5 |
138 |
5.9% |
0.05910064 |
| 7 |
Wave 7 |
353 |
15.1% |
0.15117773 |
p7group
|
Variable label:
|
Subgroup.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Municipal representatives are randomly assigned to group 1 and group 2. County representatives are assigned to group 2. Representatives from the Parliament and the Sami-Parliament are assigned to group 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Random half of municipal representatives, plus all parliament and Sámi
Parliament representatives |
1163 |
49.8% |
0.4980728 |
| 2 |
Random half of municipal representatives, plus all county representatives |
1172 |
50.2% |
0.5019272 |
p7browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Technical description:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
p7browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Technical description:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
p7mobil
|
Variable label:
|
Determines if the respondents uses mobile
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determines if the respondents uses mobile
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
1561 |
66.9% |
0.6685225 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
774 |
33.1% |
0.3314775 |
p7opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Technical description:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
p7enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
Determines respondents device type
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determines respondents device type
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
1561 |
66.9% |
0.66852248 |
| 2 |
Touch |
754 |
32.3% |
0.32291221 |
| 3 |
Generic |
20 |
0.9% |
0.00856531 |
p7advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
p7getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Technical description:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
p7per36
|
Variable label:
|
How many years have you been an elected representative?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many years have you been an elected representative (regardless of where and when you were elected)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 – 3 years |
581 |
24.9% |
0.248822270 |
| 2 |
4 – 7 years |
528 |
22.6% |
0.226124197 |
| 3 |
8 – 11 years |
360 |
15.4% |
0.154175589 |
| 4 |
12 – 15 years |
286 |
12.2% |
0.122483940 |
| 5 |
16 – 19 years |
205 |
8.8% |
0.087794433 |
| 6 |
20 or more |
371 |
15.9% |
0.158886510 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001713062 |
p7per40
|
Variable label:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
636 |
27.2% |
0.272376874 |
| 2 |
Democrats in Norway |
2 |
0.1% |
0.000856531 |
| 3 |
The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005139186 |
| 4 |
The Progress Party |
151 |
6.5% |
0.064668094 |
| 5 |
The Conservative Party |
383 |
16.4% |
0.164025696 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democrats |
119 |
5.1% |
0.050963597 |
| 7 |
The Coastal Party |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
| 8 |
The Green Party |
91 |
3.9% |
0.038972163 |
| 9 |
The Christians |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001284797 |
| 10 |
Pensioners' Party |
21 |
0.9% |
0.008993576 |
| 11 |
The Red Party |
61 |
2.6% |
0.026124197 |
| 12 |
The Centre Party |
482 |
20.6% |
0.206423983 |
| 13 |
The Socialist Left Party |
156 |
6.7% |
0.066809422 |
| 14 |
The Liberal Party |
82 |
3.5% |
0.035117773 |
| 15 |
Other |
136 |
5.8% |
0.058244111 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
p7per40_15_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which party do you represent?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2335] [Range:-]
|
p7per35
|
Variable label:
|
Is your party in government or opposition?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is your party currently in government or in opposition at your level of government?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Government |
1330 |
57% |
0.569593148 |
| 2 |
Opposition |
1000 |
42.8% |
0.428265525 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002141328 |
p7percontact_1
|
Variable label:
|
How often contacted by:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a representative, it may be the case that inhabitants contact you to express their views or concerns about political issues. Our citizen surveys show that some citizens contact politicians more often than others.
We are interested in your experience as a representative. Over the last year, how often have you been contacted by:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Members of your party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No contact |
43 |
3.7% |
0.036973345 |
| 2 |
1 - 6 times |
377 |
32.4% |
0.324161651 |
| 3 |
7 - 12 times |
202 |
17.4% |
0.173688736 |
| 4 |
At least once a month |
290 |
24.9% |
0.249355116 |
| 5 |
At least once a week |
248 |
21.3% |
0.213241617 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002579536 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7percontact_2
|
Variable label:
|
How often contacted by:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a representative, it may be the case that inhabitants contact you to express their views or concerns about political issues. Our citizen surveys show that some citizens contact politicians more often than others.
We are interested in your experience as a representative. Over the last year, how often have you been contacted by:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Representatives of a trade union
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No contact |
403 |
34.7% |
0.34651763 |
| 2 |
1 - 6 times |
510 |
43.9% |
0.43852107 |
| 3 |
7 - 12 times |
79 |
6.8% |
0.06792777 |
| 4 |
At least once a month |
99 |
8.5% |
0.08512468 |
| 5 |
At least once a week |
20 |
1.7% |
0.01719690 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
4.5% |
0.04471195 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7percontact_3
|
Variable label:
|
How often contacted by:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a representative, it may be the case that inhabitants contact you to express their views or concerns about political issues. Our citizen surveys show that some citizens contact politicians more often than others.
We are interested in your experience as a representative. Over the last year, how often have you been contacted by:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Representatives of an employer organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No contact |
673 |
57.9% |
0.578675838 |
| 2 |
1 - 6 times |
287 |
24.7% |
0.246775580 |
| 3 |
7 - 12 times |
58 |
5% |
0.049871023 |
| 4 |
At least once a month |
64 |
5.5% |
0.055030095 |
| 5 |
At least once a week |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008598452 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
6.1% |
0.061049011 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7percontact_4
|
Variable label:
|
How often contacted by:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a representative, it may be the case that inhabitants contact you to express their views or concerns about political issues. Our citizen surveys show that some citizens contact politicians more often than others.
We are interested in your experience as a representative. Over the last year, how often have you been contacted by:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Representatives of a woman’s organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No contact |
780 |
67.1% |
0.670679278 |
| 2 |
1 - 6 times |
254 |
21.8% |
0.218400688 |
| 3 |
7 - 12 times |
33 |
2.8% |
0.028374893 |
| 4 |
At least once a month |
19 |
1.6% |
0.016337059 |
| 5 |
At least once a week |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002579536 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
6.4% |
0.063628547 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7percontact_5
|
Variable label:
|
How often contacted by:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a representative, it may be the case that inhabitants contact you to express their views or concerns about political issues. Our citizen surveys show that some citizens contact politicians more often than others.
We are interested in your experience as a representative. Over the last year, how often have you been contacted by:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Representatives of a fisheries organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No contact |
884 |
76% |
0.7601031814 |
| 2 |
1 - 6 times |
160 |
13.8% |
0.1375752365 |
| 3 |
7 - 12 times |
23 |
2% |
0.0197764402 |
| 4 |
At least once a month |
20 |
1.7% |
0.0171969046 |
| 5 |
At least once a week |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008598452 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
6.4% |
0.0644883921 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7percontact_6
|
Variable label:
|
How often contacted by:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a representative, it may be the case that inhabitants contact you to express their views or concerns about political issues. Our citizen surveys show that some citizens contact politicians more often than others.
We are interested in your experience as a representative. Over the last year, how often have you been contacted by:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Representatives of a student organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No contact |
832 |
71.5% |
0.7153912296 |
| 2 |
1 - 6 times |
216 |
18.6% |
0.1857265692 |
| 3 |
7 - 12 times |
23 |
2% |
0.0197764402 |
| 4 |
At least once a month |
14 |
1.2% |
0.0120378332 |
| 5 |
At least once a week |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008598452 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
77 |
6.6% |
0.0662080825 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perclimate
|
Variable label:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your view on climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your view on climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I believe that the climate is not changing. |
11 |
0.9% |
0.009458298 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
31 |
2.7% |
0.026655202 |
| 3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it has little to do with human
action. |
196 |
16.9% |
0.168529665 |
| 4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it to a large extent is due to
human action. |
922 |
79.3% |
0.792777300 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002579536 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perconcern
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all concerned |
32 |
2.8% |
0.027515047 |
| 2 |
Not particularly concerned |
146 |
12.6% |
0.125537403 |
| 3 |
Somewhat concerned |
302 |
26% |
0.259673259 |
| 4 |
Concerned |
422 |
36.3% |
0.362854686 |
| 5 |
Very concerned |
250 |
21.5% |
0.214961307 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.9% |
0.009458298 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perearth2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Respondents are exposed to either p7perearth2a (1/3 probability) or p7perearth2b (2/3 probability).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1163] [Invalid:1172] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
P7PEREARTH2a after P7PERCONCERN |
363 |
31.2% |
0.3121238 |
| 2 |
P7PEREARTH2b after P7PEREARTH1 |
377 |
32.4% |
0.3241617 |
| 3 |
P7PEREARTH2b after P7PEREARTH1 |
423 |
36.4% |
0.3637145 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perearth2a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Significantly reduce international flights
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change can be prevented to some extent if we change our lifestyles.
To what extent do you support or oppose political regulation for the following purposes to contribute to this:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Significantly reduce international flights
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you require further information about the effect that lifestyle change can have on climate change, see the report from the Norwegian Environment Agency (link).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perearth2_ran = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Link: https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/2020/januar-2020/klimakur2030/]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
40 |
11% |
0.110192837 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
76 |
20.9% |
0.209366391 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
107 |
29.5% |
0.294765840 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
40 |
11% |
0.110192837 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
40 |
11% |
0.110192837 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
35 |
9.6% |
0.096418733 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
22 |
6.1% |
0.060606061 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.8% |
0.008264463 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1972 |
|
NA |
p7perearth2a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Significantly reduce the number of non-electric cars
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change can be prevented to some extent if we change our lifestyles.
To what extent do you support or oppose political regulation for the following purposes to contribute to this:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Significantly reduce the number of non-electric cars
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you require further information about the effect that lifestyle change can have on climate change, see the report from the Norwegian Environment Agency (link).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perearth2_ran = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Link: https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/2020/januar-2020/klimakur2030/]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
34 |
9.4% |
0.093663912 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
77 |
21.2% |
0.212121212 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
97 |
26.7% |
0.267217631 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
40 |
11% |
0.110192837 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
48 |
13.2% |
0.132231405 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
36 |
9.9% |
0.099173554 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
28 |
7.7% |
0.077134986 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.8% |
0.008264463 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1972 |
|
NA |
p7perearth2a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Significantly reduce the use of disposable items
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change can be prevented to some extent if we change our lifestyles.
To what extent do you support or oppose political regulation for the following purposes to contribute to this:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Significantly reduce the use of disposable items
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you require further information about the effect that lifestyle change can have on climate change, see the report from the Norwegian Environment Agency (link).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perearth2_ran = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Link: https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/2020/januar-2020/klimakur2030/]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
99 |
27.3% |
0.272727273 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
139 |
38.3% |
0.382920110 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
81 |
22.3% |
0.223140496 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
18 |
5% |
0.049586777 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
14 |
3.9% |
0.038567493 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
3 |
0.8% |
0.008264463 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
4 |
1.1% |
0.011019284 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
1.4% |
0.013774105 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1972 |
|
NA |
p7perearth2a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Encourage a more plant-based diet by taxing and subsidising foods
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change can be prevented to some extent if we change our lifestyles.
To what extent do you support or oppose political regulation for the following purposes to contribute to this:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Encourage a more plant-based diet by taxing and subsidising foods
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you require further information about the effect that lifestyle change can have on climate change, see the report from the Norwegian Environment Agency (link).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perearth2_ran = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Link: https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/2020/januar-2020/klimakur2030/]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
17 |
4.7% |
0.046831956 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
25 |
6.9% |
0.068870523 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
69 |
19% |
0.190082645 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
50 |
13.8% |
0.137741047 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
63 |
17.4% |
0.173553719 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
62 |
17.1% |
0.170798898 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
74 |
20.4% |
0.203856749 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.8% |
0.008264463 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1972 |
|
NA |
p7perearth2a_5
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Encourage a more plant-based diet by providing useful information about how this can be achieved in a healthy way
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change can be prevented to some extent if we change our lifestyles.
To what extent do you support or oppose political regulation for the following purposes to contribute to this:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Encourage a more plant-based diet by providing useful information about how this can be achieved in a healthy way
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you require further information about the effect that lifestyle change can have on climate change, see the report from the Norwegian Environment Agency (link).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perearth2_ran = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Link: https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/2020/januar-2020/klimakur2030/]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
43 |
11.8% |
0.118457300 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
52 |
14.3% |
0.143250689 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
108 |
29.8% |
0.297520661 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
73 |
20.1% |
0.201101928 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
28 |
7.7% |
0.077134986 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
31 |
8.5% |
0.085399449 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
26 |
7.2% |
0.071625344 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005509642 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1972 |
|
NA |
p7perearth3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think you are well informed about the likely consequences of climate change in the area in which you live?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think you are well informed about the likely consequences of climate change in the area in which you live?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
102 |
8.8% |
0.087704213 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
422 |
36.3% |
0.362854686 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
443 |
38.1% |
0.380911436 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
161 |
13.8% |
0.138435082 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
24 |
2.1% |
0.020636285 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.9% |
0.009458298 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perearth4
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you imagine having more direct contact with climate researchers in order to gain better insight into their scientific knowledge?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you imagine having more direct contact with climate researchers in order to gain better insight into their scientific knowledge?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
94 |
8.1% |
0.08082545 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
273 |
23.5% |
0.23473775 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
527 |
45.3% |
0.45313844 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
209 |
18% |
0.17970765 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
44 |
3.8% |
0.03783319 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01375752 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7permeat_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in p7permeat.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1160] [Invalid:1175] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
production |
608 |
52.4% |
0.5241379 |
| 2 |
consumption |
552 |
47.6% |
0.4758621 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1175 |
|
NA |
p7permeat_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in p7permeat.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1160] [Invalid:1175] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway |
402 |
34.7% |
0.3465517 |
| 2 |
Europe |
360 |
31% |
0.3103448 |
| 3 |
world |
398 |
34.3% |
0.3431034 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1175 |
|
NA |
p7permeat_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in p7permeat.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1160] [Invalid:1175] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
559 |
48.2% |
0.4818966 |
| 1 |
to limit climate change |
601 |
51.8% |
0.5181034 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1175 |
|
NA |
p7permeat
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Meat production/consumption must be reduced
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Meat[p7permeat_ran1] in [p7permeat_ran2] must be reduced[p7permeat_ran3]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
86 |
7.4% |
0.073946690 |
| 2 |
Agree |
155 |
13.3% |
0.133276010 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
245 |
21.1% |
0.210662081 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
142 |
12.2% |
0.122098022 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
139 |
12% |
0.119518487 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
198 |
17% |
0.170249355 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
192 |
16.5% |
0.165090284 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005159071 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perdac1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experienced the following undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Over the last 12 months, have you experienced any of the following forms of undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Received unwanted enquiries (for example, text messages, calls, emails, letters, social media)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never |
667 |
57.4% |
0.573516767 |
| 2 |
Once |
119 |
10.2% |
0.102321582 |
| 3 |
2–5 times |
212 |
18.2% |
0.182287188 |
| 4 |
More than five times |
141 |
12.1% |
0.121238177 |
| 5 |
Don’t know/don’t wish to respond |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005159071 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.5% |
0.015477214 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perdac1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experienced the following undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Over the last 12 months, have you experienced any of the following forms of undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Received malicious information about yourself (for example, newspaper articles, blogs, smear campaigns online or in social media)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never |
729 |
62.7% |
0.62682717 |
| 2 |
Once |
111 |
9.5% |
0.09544282 |
| 3 |
2–5 times |
185 |
15.9% |
0.15907137 |
| 4 |
More than five times |
95 |
8.2% |
0.08168530 |
| 5 |
Don’t know/don’t wish to respond |
20 |
1.7% |
0.01719690 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
2% |
0.01977644 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perdac1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Experienced the following undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Over the last 12 months, have you experienced any of the following forms of undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Been subject to unpleasant or unwanted attempts at being contacted or approached (for example, at home, at work or in public places)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never |
882 |
75.8% |
0.758383491 |
| 2 |
Once |
119 |
10.2% |
0.102321582 |
| 3 |
2–5 times |
114 |
9.8% |
0.098022356 |
| 4 |
More than five times |
26 |
2.2% |
0.022355976 |
| 5 |
Don’t know/don’t wish to respond |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003439381 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.5% |
0.015477214 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perdac1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Experienced the following undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Over the last 12 months, have you experienced any of the following forms of undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Been subject to physical attacks or attempted attacks against yourself or people close to you
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never |
1112 |
95.6% |
0.9561478934 |
| 2 |
Once |
23 |
2% |
0.0197764402 |
| 3 |
2–5 times |
3 |
0.3% |
0.0025795357 |
| 4 |
More than five times |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008598452 |
| 5 |
Don’t know/don’t wish to respond |
5 |
0.4% |
0.0042992261 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.6% |
0.0163370593 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perdac1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Experienced the following undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Over the last 12 months, have you experienced any of the following forms of undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Been subject to damage to property or personal possessions (for example, house or car)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never |
1103 |
94.8% |
0.9484092863 |
| 2 |
Once |
26 |
2.2% |
0.0223559759 |
| 3 |
2–5 times |
7 |
0.6% |
0.0060189166 |
| 4 |
More than five times |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008598452 |
| 5 |
Don’t know/don’t wish to respond |
6 |
0.5% |
0.0051590714 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.7% |
0.0171969046 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perdac1_6
|
Variable label:
|
Experienced the following undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Over the last 12 months, have you experienced any of the following forms of undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Been subject to other incidents: describe
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never |
556 |
47.8% |
0.47807395 |
| 2 |
Once |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01805675 |
| 3 |
2–5 times |
26 |
2.2% |
0.02235598 |
| 4 |
More than five times |
18 |
1.5% |
0.01547721 |
| 5 |
Don’t know/don’t wish to respond |
42 |
3.6% |
0.03611350 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
500 |
43% |
0.42992261 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perdac1_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Experienced the following undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Over the last 12 months, have you experienced any of the following forms of undesirable behaviour in connection with your work as an elected representative:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Been subject to other incidents: describe
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2335] [Range:-]
|
p7perdac1_mask
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. [p7perdac2_1-2_8], [p7perdac3], and [p7perdac4] are exposed to the respondent only if at least one of [p7perdac1_1-1_6] has the value 2, 3, or 4.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1154] [Invalid:1181] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not exposed to p7perdac2-4 |
520 |
45.1% |
0.4506066 |
| 1 |
Exposed to p7perdac2-4 |
634 |
54.9% |
0.5493934 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1181 |
|
NA |
p7perdac2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents: Individual(s)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Individual(s)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick all relevant categories.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perdac1_mask = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Experiment. Respondents are exposed to p7perdac2_1-2_8, p7perdac3, and p7perdac4 if at least one of p7perdac1_1-1_6 have the value of 2, 3, or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
497 |
78.4% |
0.7839117 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
137 |
21.6% |
0.2160883 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1701 |
|
NA |
p7perdac2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents: Representative(s) of stakeholder group(s)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Representative(s) of stakeholder group(s)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick all relevant categories.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perdac1_mask = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Experiment. Respondents are exposed to p7perdac2_1-2_8, p7perdac3, and p7perdac4 if at least one of p7perdac1_1-1_6 have the value of 2, 3, or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
147 |
23.2% |
0.2318612 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
487 |
76.8% |
0.7681388 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1701 |
|
NA |
p7perdac2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents: Politician(s) from own party/own list
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Politician(s) from own party/own list
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick all relevant categories.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perdac1_mask = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Experiment. Respondents are exposed to p7perdac2_1-2_8, p7perdac3, and p7perdac4 if at least one of p7perdac1_1-1_6 have the value of 2, 3, or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
32 |
5% |
0.05047319 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
602 |
95% |
0.94952681 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1701 |
|
NA |
p7perdac2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents: Politician(s) from other parties/other lists
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Politician(s) from other parties/other lists
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick all relevant categories.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perdac1_mask = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Experiment. Respondents are exposed to p7perdac2_1-2_8, p7perdac3, and p7perdac4 if at least one of p7perdac1_1-1_6 have the value of 2, 3, or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
189 |
29.8% |
0.2981073 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
445 |
70.2% |
0.7018927 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1701 |
|
NA |
p7perdac2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents: Administrative employee(s) at my organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Administrative employee(s) at my organisation
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick all relevant categories.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perdac1_mask = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Experiment. Respondents are exposed to p7perdac2_1-2_8, p7perdac3, and p7perdac4 if at least one of p7perdac1_1-1_6 have the value of 2, 3, or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
23 |
3.6% |
0.0362776 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
611 |
96.4% |
0.9637224 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1701 |
|
NA |
p7perdac2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents: Journalists or other media representatives
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Journalists or other media representatives
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick all relevant categories.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perdac1_mask = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Experiment. Respondents are exposed to p7perdac2_1-2_8, p7perdac3, and p7perdac4 if at least one of p7perdac1_1-1_6 have the value of 2, 3, or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
65 |
10.3% |
0.1025237 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
569 |
89.7% |
0.8974763 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1701 |
|
NA |
p7perdac2_7
|
Variable label:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents: Others, describe:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Others, describe:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick all relevant categories.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perdac1_mask = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Experiment. Respondents are exposed to p7perdac2_1-2_8, p7perdac3, and p7perdac4 if at least one of p7perdac1_1-1_6 have the value of 2, 3, or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
12 |
1.9% |
0.01892744 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
622 |
98.1% |
0.98107256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1701 |
|
NA |
p7perdac2_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Who subjected you to these incidents:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Others, describe:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick all relevant categories.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perdac1_mask = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Experiment. Respondents are exposed to p7perdac2_1-2_8, p7perdac3, and p7perdac4 if at least one of p7perdac1_1-1_6 have the value of 2, 3, or 4.]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2335] [Range:-]
|
p7perdac2_8
|
Variable label:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents: Don’t know/prefer not to answer
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who subjected you to these incidents?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t know/prefer not to answer
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick all relevant categories.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perdac1_mask = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Experiment. Respondents are exposed to p7perdac2_1-2_8, p7perdac3, and p7perdac4 if at least one of p7perdac1_1-1_6 have the value of 2, 3, or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
19 |
3% |
0.02996845 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
615 |
97% |
0.97003155 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1701 |
|
NA |
p7perdac3
|
Variable label:
|
Did the fact that you were exposed to such incidents make you more afraid or anxious in your work as a politician?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Did the fact that you were exposed to such incidents make you more afraid or anxious in your work as a politician?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perdac1_mask = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Experiment. Respondents are exposed to p7perdac2_1-2_8, p7perdac3, and p7perdac4 if at least one of p7perdac1_1-1_6 have the value of 2, 3, or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
441 |
69.6% |
0.695583596 |
| 2 |
Yes, a little more |
159 |
25.1% |
0.250788644 |
| 3 |
Yes, much more |
17 |
2.7% |
0.026813880 |
| 4 |
Yes, significantly more |
15 |
2.4% |
0.023659306 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.3% |
0.003154574 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1701 |
|
NA |
p7perdac4
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent have such incidents contributed to you considering resigning as an elected representative?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent have such incidents contributed to you considering resigning as an elected representative?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perdac1_mask = 1 & p7group = 1]
[Experiment. Respondents are exposed to p7perdac2_1-2_8, p7perdac3, and p7perdac4 if at least one of p7perdac1_1-1_6 have the value of 2, 3, or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
36 |
5.7% |
0.056782334 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
42 |
6.6% |
0.066246057 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
130 |
20.5% |
0.205047319 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
150 |
23.7% |
0.236593060 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
273 |
43.1% |
0.430599369 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.5% |
0.004731861 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1701 |
|
NA |
p7percontact2_ran1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns a value for textpiping in p7percontact2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1154] [Invalid:1181] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nora Wilhelmsen |
196 |
17% |
0.1698440 |
| 2 |
Thea Friele |
212 |
18.4% |
0.1837088 |
| 3 |
Hedda Dahl |
184 |
15.9% |
0.1594454 |
| 4 |
Jeanette Jensen |
195 |
16.9% |
0.1689775 |
| 5 |
Anita Andersen |
171 |
14.8% |
0.1481802 |
| 6 |
Silje Hansen |
196 |
17% |
0.1698440 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1181 |
|
NA |
p7percontact2_ran1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns a value for textpiping in p7percontact2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1154] [Invalid:1181] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nora Wilhelmsen |
180 |
15.6% |
0.1559792 |
| 2 |
Thea Friele |
190 |
16.5% |
0.1646447 |
| 3 |
Hedda Dahl |
198 |
17.2% |
0.1715771 |
| 4 |
Jeanette Jensen |
181 |
15.7% |
0.1568458 |
| 5 |
Anita Andersen |
203 |
17.6% |
0.1759099 |
| 6 |
Silje Hansen |
202 |
17.5% |
0.1750433 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1181 |
|
NA |
p7percontact2_ran2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns a value for textpiping in p7percontact2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1154] [Invalid:1181] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
and I work as a hairdresser |
184 |
15.9% |
0.1594454 |
| 2 |
and I work as a lawyer |
205 |
17.8% |
0.1776430 |
| 3 |
and I represent a women’s organisation |
168 |
14.6% |
0.1455806 |
| 4 |
and I represent a fisheries organisation |
197 |
17.1% |
0.1707106 |
| 5 |
and I represent a student organisation |
197 |
17.1% |
0.1707106 |
| 6 |
|
203 |
17.6% |
0.1759099 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1181 |
|
NA |
p7percontact2_ran2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns a value for textpiping in p7percontact2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1154] [Invalid:1181] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
and I work as a hairdresser |
216 |
18.7% |
0.1871750 |
| 2 |
and I work as a lawyer |
175 |
15.2% |
0.1516464 |
| 3 |
and I represent a women’s organisation |
200 |
17.3% |
0.1733102 |
| 4 |
and I represent a fisheries organisation |
183 |
15.9% |
0.1585789 |
| 5 |
and I represent a student organisation |
190 |
16.5% |
0.1646447 |
| 6 |
|
190 |
16.5% |
0.1646447 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1181 |
|
NA |
p7percontact2_ran3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns a value for textpiping in p7percontact2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1154] [Invalid:1181] [Range:0-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
. |
219 |
19% |
0.1897747 |
| 1 |
. I support your party and always vote for you. |
265 |
23% |
0.2296360 |
| 2 |
. I don’t usually vote. |
238 |
20.6% |
0.2062392 |
| 3 |
. I usually vote for a different party than yours. |
214 |
18.5% |
0.1854419 |
| 4 |
. I usually vote for other parties but am considering changing my vote at the
next election. |
218 |
18.9% |
0.1889081 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1181 |
|
NA |
p7percontact2_ran3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns a value for textpiping in p7percontact2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1154] [Invalid:1181] [Range:0-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
. |
249 |
21.6% |
0.2157712 |
| 1 |
. I support your party and always vote for you. |
240 |
20.8% |
0.2079723 |
| 2 |
. I don’t usually vote. |
230 |
19.9% |
0.1993068 |
| 3 |
. I usually vote for a different party than yours. |
216 |
18.7% |
0.1871750 |
| 4 |
. I usually vote for other parties but am considering changing my vote at the
next election. |
219 |
19% |
0.1897747 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1181 |
|
NA |
p7percontact2_ran4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns a value for textpiping in p7percontact2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1154] [Invalid:1181] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I would like more information about |
398 |
34.5% |
0.3448873 |
| 2 |
I would like to express my support for |
387 |
33.5% |
0.3353553 |
| 3 |
I would like to express my criticism of |
369 |
32% |
0.3197574 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1181 |
|
NA |
p7percontact2_ran4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns a value for textpiping in p7percontact2.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1154] [Invalid:1181] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I would like more information about |
367 |
31.8% |
0.3180243 |
| 2 |
I would like to express my support for |
413 |
35.8% |
0.3578856 |
| 3 |
I would like to express my criticism of |
374 |
32.4% |
0.3240901 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1181 |
|
NA |
p7percontact2
|
Variable label:
|
If busy: Which e-mail would you respond to?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As an elected representative, it is sometimes necessary to prioritise what you spend time on. Imagine you are in a hurry and only manage to reply to one of two emails from two voters. Which voter would you choose to respond to?
Email 1
Hi,
My name is [p7percontact2_ran1_1][p7percontact2_ran2_1][p7percontact2_ran3_1]
I’m writing to you because [p7percontact2_ran4_1] your stance on property tax.
Can you elaborate on your views in this matter?
Best wishes,
[p7percontact2_ran1_1]
Email 2
Hi,
My name is [p7percontact2_ran1_2][p7percontact2_ran2_2][p7percontact2_ran3_2]
I’m writing to you because [p7percontact2_ran4_2] your stance on property tax.
Can you elaborate on your views in this matter?
Best wishes,
[p7percontact2_ran1_2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which one would you have chosen to reply to?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
[Two versions of the e-mail is showed to the respondent. E-mail 1 collects values from [p7percontact2_ran1_1], [p7percontact2_ran2_1], [p7percontact2_ran3_1], [p7percontact2_ran4_1]. E-mail 2 collects values from [p7percontact2_ran1_2], [p7percontact2_ran2_2], [p7percontact2_ran3_2], [p7percontact2_ran4_2].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
E-mail 1 |
561 |
48.2% |
0.48237317 |
| 2 |
E-mail 2 |
576 |
49.5% |
0.49527085 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
2.2% |
0.02235598 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1_pipe1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Assigns an element for textpiping in p7pertdr1a-1f dependent on what level the representative is elected to.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1172] [Invalid:1163] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
your municipal council |
1086 |
92.7% |
0.92662116 |
| 2 |
your county council |
86 |
7.3% |
0.07337884 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1_pipe2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Assigns an element for textpiping in p7pertdr1a-1f dependent on what level the representative is elected to.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1172] [Invalid:1163] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
your municipality |
1086 |
92.7% |
0.92662116 |
| 2 |
your county |
86 |
7.3% |
0.07337884 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1_pipe3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Assigns an element for textpiping in p7pertdr1a-1f dependent on what level the representative is elected to.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1172] [Invalid:1163] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
local roads |
1086 |
92.7% |
0.92662116 |
| 2 |
county roads |
86 |
7.3% |
0.07337884 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1a_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in p7pertdr1a.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1172] [Invalid:1163] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
supports |
374 |
31.9% |
0.3191126 |
| 2 |
is against |
384 |
32.8% |
0.3276451 |
| 3 |
|
414 |
35.3% |
0.3532423 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1a_ran_rev
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Assigns the opposite value of p7pertdr1a_ran for textpiping in p7pertdr1a.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:758] [Invalid:1577] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
supports |
384 |
50.7% |
0.5065963 |
| 2 |
is against |
374 |
49.3% |
0.4934037 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1577 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1b_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in p7pertdr1b.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1172] [Invalid:1163] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
supports |
389 |
33.2% |
0.3319113 |
| 2 |
is against |
391 |
33.4% |
0.3336177 |
| 3 |
|
392 |
33.4% |
0.3344710 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1b_ran_rev
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Assigns the opposite value of p7pertdr1b_ran for textpiping in p7pertdr1b.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:780] [Invalid:1555] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
supports |
391 |
50.1% |
0.5012821 |
| 2 |
is against |
389 |
49.9% |
0.4987179 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1555 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1c_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in p7pertdr1c.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1172] [Invalid:1163] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
supports |
404 |
34.5% |
0.3447099 |
| 2 |
is against |
382 |
32.6% |
0.3259386 |
| 3 |
|
386 |
32.9% |
0.3293515 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1c_ran_rev
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Assigns the opposite value of p7pertdr1c_ran for textpiping in p7pertdr1c.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:786] [Invalid:1549] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
supports |
382 |
48.6% |
0.4860051 |
| 2 |
is against |
404 |
51.4% |
0.5139949 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1549 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1d_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in p7pertdr1d.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1172] [Invalid:1163] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
supports |
427 |
36.4% |
0.3643345 |
| 2 |
is against |
374 |
31.9% |
0.3191126 |
| 3 |
|
371 |
31.7% |
0.3165529 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1d_ran_rev
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Assigns the opposite value of p7pertdr1d_ran for textpiping in p7pertdr1d.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:801] [Invalid:1534] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
supports |
374 |
46.7% |
0.4669164 |
| 2 |
is against |
427 |
53.3% |
0.5330836 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1534 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1e_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in p7pertdr1e.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1172] [Invalid:1163] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
supports |
410 |
35% |
0.3498294 |
| 2 |
is against |
365 |
31.1% |
0.3114334 |
| 3 |
|
397 |
33.9% |
0.3387372 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1e_ran_rev
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Assigns the opposite value of p7pertdr1e_ran for textpiping in p7pertdr1e.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:775] [Invalid:1560] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
supports |
365 |
47.1% |
0.4709677 |
| 2 |
is against |
410 |
52.9% |
0.5290323 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1560 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1f_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in p7pertdr1f.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1172] [Invalid:1163] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
supports |
396 |
33.8% |
0.3378840 |
| 2 |
is against |
353 |
30.1% |
0.3011945 |
| 3 |
|
423 |
36.1% |
0.3609215 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1f_ran_rev
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Assigns the opposite value of p7pertdr1f_ran for textpiping in p7pertdr1f.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:749] [Invalid:1586] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
supports |
353 |
47.1% |
0.4712951 |
| 2 |
is against |
396 |
52.9% |
0.5287049 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1586 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1a
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose the construction of a new road in your municipality/county?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a hypothetical scenario in which [p7pertdr1_pipe1] discusses the construction of a new [p7pertdr1_pipe3] in [p7pertdr1_pipe2].
[p7pertdr1a_pipe]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly would you support or oppose the construction of a new [p7pertdr1_pipe3] in [p7pertdr1_pipe2]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
135 |
11.5% |
0.115187713 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
328 |
28% |
0.279863481 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
272 |
23.2% |
0.232081911 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
132 |
11.3% |
0.112627986 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
179 |
15.3% |
0.152730375 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
101 |
8.6% |
0.086177474 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
19 |
1.6% |
0.016211604 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005119454 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1b
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose the construction of a new hospital in your municipality/county?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a hypothetical scenario in which [p7pertdr1_pipe1] discusses the construction of a new hospital in [p7pertdr1_pipe2].
[p7pertdr1b_pipe]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly would you support or oppose the construction of a new hospital in [p7pertdr1_pipe2]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
207 |
17.7% |
0.176621160 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
353 |
30.1% |
0.301194539 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
213 |
18.2% |
0.181740614 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
129 |
11% |
0.110068259 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
134 |
11.4% |
0.114334471 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
96 |
8.2% |
0.081911263 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
33 |
2.8% |
0.028156997 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.005972696 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1c
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose the construction the construction of a new nursing home in your municipality/county?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a hypothetical scenario in which [p7pertdr1_pipe1] discusses the construction of a new nursing home in [p7pertdr1_pipe2].
[p7pertdr1c_pipe]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly would you support or oppose the construction of a new nursing home in [p7pertdr1_pipe2]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
210 |
17.9% |
0.179180887 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
414 |
35.3% |
0.353242321 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
225 |
19.2% |
0.191979522 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
92 |
7.8% |
0.078498294 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
136 |
11.6% |
0.116040956 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
72 |
6.1% |
0.061433447 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
13 |
1.1% |
0.011092150 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008532423 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1d
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose the construction the construction of a new museum on the history of your municipality/county?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a hypothetical scenario in which [p7pertdr1_pipe1] discusses the construction of a new museum on the history of [P7pertdr1_pipe2].
[p7pertdr1d_pipe]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly would you support or oppose the construction of a new museum on the history of [P7pertdr1_pipe2]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
90 |
7.7% |
0.076791809 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
281 |
24% |
0.239761092 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
322 |
27.5% |
0.274744027 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
124 |
10.6% |
0.105802048 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
198 |
16.9% |
0.168941980 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
121 |
10.3% |
0.103242321 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
34 |
2.9% |
0.029010239 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001706485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1e
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose the construction of a new wind farm in your municipality/county?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a hypothetical scenario in which [p7pertdr1_pipe1] discusses the construction of a new wind farm in [p7pertdr1_pipe2].
[p7pertdr1e_pipe]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly would you support or oppose the construction of a new wind farm in [p7pertdr1_pipe2]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
57 |
4.9% |
0.048634812 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
139 |
11.9% |
0.118600683 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
179 |
15.3% |
0.152730375 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
71 |
6.1% |
0.060580205 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
161 |
13.7% |
0.137372014 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
243 |
20.7% |
0.207337884 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
320 |
27.3% |
0.273037543 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001706485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1f
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose the construction of a new waste plant in your municipality/county?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a hypothetical scenario in which [p7pertdr1_pipe1] discusses the construction of a new waste plant in [p7pertdr1_pipe2].
[p7pertdr1f_pipe]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly would you support or oppose the construction of a new waste plant in [p7pertdr1_pipe2]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
124 |
10.6% |
0.105802048 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
440 |
37.5% |
0.375426621 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
236 |
20.1% |
0.201365188 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
119 |
10.2% |
0.101535836 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
153 |
13.1% |
0.130546075 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
81 |
6.9% |
0.069112628 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
17 |
1.5% |
0.014505119 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001706485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr1_q_order
|
Variable label:
|
Reveals the order p7pertdr1a-1f was posed to the respondent.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1172] [Invalid:1163] [Range:-]
|
p7per101_1
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The neighbourhood or village you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The neighbourhood or village you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong connection |
410 |
35% |
0.349829352 |
| 2 |
Strong connection |
481 |
41% |
0.410409556 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
235 |
20.1% |
0.200511945 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
33 |
2.8% |
0.028156997 |
| 5 |
No connection |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005119454 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.005972696 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per101_2
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The municipality you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The municipality you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong connection |
452 |
38.6% |
0.3856655290 |
| 2 |
Strong connection |
535 |
45.6% |
0.4564846416 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
158 |
13.5% |
0.1348122867 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
20 |
1.7% |
0.0170648464 |
| 5 |
No connection |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008532423 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.0051194539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per101_3
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The county you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The county you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong connection |
165 |
14.1% |
0.140784983 |
| 2 |
Strong connection |
399 |
34% |
0.340443686 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
386 |
32.9% |
0.329351536 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
177 |
15.1% |
0.151023891 |
| 5 |
No connection |
39 |
3.3% |
0.033276451 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005119454 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per101_4
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The region (part of the country) you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The region (part of the country) you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong connection |
200 |
17.1% |
0.170648464 |
| 2 |
Strong connection |
462 |
39.4% |
0.394197952 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
353 |
30.1% |
0.301194539 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
121 |
10.3% |
0.103242321 |
| 5 |
No connection |
26 |
2.2% |
0.022184300 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008532423 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per101_5
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong connection |
628 |
53.6% |
0.535836177 |
| 2 |
Strong connection |
451 |
38.5% |
0.384812287 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
72 |
6.1% |
0.061433447 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
14 |
1.2% |
0.011945392 |
| 5 |
No connection |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.005972696 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per101_6
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The Nordic countries
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Nordic countries
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong connection |
126 |
10.8% |
0.107508532 |
| 2 |
Strong connection |
408 |
34.8% |
0.348122867 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
465 |
39.7% |
0.396757679 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
143 |
12.2% |
0.122013652 |
| 5 |
No connection |
19 |
1.6% |
0.016211604 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.9% |
0.009385666 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per101_7
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: Europe
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Europe
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong connection |
123 |
10.5% |
0.104948805 |
| 2 |
Strong connection |
323 |
27.6% |
0.275597270 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
460 |
39.2% |
0.392491468 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
206 |
17.6% |
0.175767918 |
| 5 |
No connection |
52 |
4.4% |
0.044368601 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006825939 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per134
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
327 |
27.9% |
0.279010239 |
| 2 |
Agree |
343 |
29.3% |
0.292662116 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
236 |
20.1% |
0.201365188 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
60 |
5.1% |
0.051194539 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
76 |
6.5% |
0.064846416 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
93 |
7.9% |
0.079351536 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
34 |
2.9% |
0.029010239 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002559727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per135
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Government authorities should intervene with measures to even out economic inequalities that exist between different parts of the country.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities should intervene with measures to even out economic inequalities that exist between different parts of the country.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
324 |
27.6% |
0.276450512 |
| 2 |
Agree |
403 |
34.4% |
0.343856655 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
270 |
23% |
0.230375427 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
65 |
5.5% |
0.055460751 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
51 |
4.4% |
0.043515358 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
43 |
3.7% |
0.036689420 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
1.2% |
0.011945392 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001706485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per136
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
206 |
17.6% |
0.175767918 |
| 2 |
Agree |
389 |
33.2% |
0.331911263 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
338 |
28.8% |
0.288395904 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
93 |
7.9% |
0.079351536 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
64 |
5.5% |
0.054607509 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
59 |
5% |
0.050341297 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
1.8% |
0.017918089 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001706485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per110
|
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
524 |
44.7% |
0.447098976 |
| 2 |
Good |
528 |
45.1% |
0.450511945 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
77 |
6.6% |
0.065699659 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
18 |
1.5% |
0.015358362 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
15 |
1.3% |
0.012798635 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004266212 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001706485 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002559727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per111
|
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in your part of the country compared to the rest of the country
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation in/on [p7P2] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation in/on [p7P2] to be better, the same, or worse?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if landsdel is answered & p7group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Better |
363 |
31% |
0.309726962 |
| 2 |
The same |
577 |
49.2% |
0.492320819 |
| 3 |
Worse |
224 |
19.1% |
0.191126280 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006825939 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per108a_1
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Further merging of municipalities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In recent years there has been a debate about the merging of counties/municipalities. Some people support additional mergers while other people believe that counties/municipalities should be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Other people, in turn, want to retain counties/municipalities in their present form.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Further merging of municipalities.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
[Posed on the same page as p7per108b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
115 |
9.8% |
0.09812287 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
165 |
14.1% |
0.14078498 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
227 |
19.4% |
0.19368601 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
149 |
12.7% |
0.12713311 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
157 |
13.4% |
0.13395904 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
153 |
13.1% |
0.13054608 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
193 |
16.5% |
0.16467577 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
1.1% |
0.01109215 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per108a_2
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Retain the present number of municipalities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In recent years there has been a debate about the merging of counties/municipalities. Some people support additional mergers while other people believe that counties/municipalities should be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Other people, in turn, want to retain counties/municipalities in their present form.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Retain the present number of municipalities.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
[Posed on the same page as p7per108b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
65 |
5.5% |
0.05546075 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
151 |
12.9% |
0.12883959 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
182 |
15.5% |
0.15529010 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
346 |
29.5% |
0.29522184 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
238 |
20.3% |
0.20307167 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
109 |
9.3% |
0.09300341 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
58 |
4.9% |
0.04948805 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
2% |
0.01962457 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per108a_3
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Give municipalities the opportunity to assume their original form.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In recent years there has been a debate about the merging of counties/municipalities. Some people support additional mergers while other people believe that counties/municipalities should be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Other people, in turn, want to retain counties/municipalities in their present form.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give municipalities the opportunity to assume their original form.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
[Posed on the same page as p7per108b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
170 |
14.5% |
0.14505119 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
184 |
15.7% |
0.15699659 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
220 |
18.8% |
0.18771331 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
136 |
11.6% |
0.11604096 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
163 |
13.9% |
0.13907850 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
151 |
12.9% |
0.12883959 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
128 |
10.9% |
0.10921502 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.7% |
0.01706485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per108b_1
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Further merging of counties.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In recent years there has been a debate about the merging of counties/municipalities. Some people support additional mergers while other people believe that counties/municipalities should be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Other people, in turn, want to retain counties/municipalities in their present form.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Further merging of counties.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
[Posed on the same page as p7per108a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
76 |
6.5% |
0.06484642 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
74 |
6.3% |
0.06313993 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
131 |
11.2% |
0.11177474 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
210 |
17.9% |
0.17918089 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
175 |
14.9% |
0.14931741 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
225 |
19.2% |
0.19197952 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
263 |
22.4% |
0.22440273 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.5% |
0.01535836 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per108b_2
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Retain the present number of counties.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In recent years there has been a debate about the merging of counties/municipalities. Some people support additional mergers while other people believe that counties/municipalities should be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Other people, in turn, want to retain counties/municipalities in their present form.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Retain the present number of counties.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
[Posed on the same page as p7per108a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
66 |
5.6% |
0.05631399 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
132 |
11.3% |
0.11262799 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
173 |
14.8% |
0.14761092 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
333 |
28.4% |
0.28412969 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
208 |
17.7% |
0.17747440 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
113 |
9.6% |
0.09641638 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
123 |
10.5% |
0.10494881 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
2% |
0.02047782 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7per108b_3
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Give counties the opportunity to assume their original form.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In recent years there has been a debate about the merging of counties/municipalities. Some people support additional mergers while other people believe that counties/municipalities should be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Other people, in turn, want to retain counties/municipalities in their present form.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give counties the opportunity to assume their original form.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
[Posed on the same page as p7per108a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
248 |
21.2% |
0.21160410 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
194 |
16.6% |
0.16552901 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
210 |
17.9% |
0.17918089 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
118 |
10.1% |
0.10068259 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
109 |
9.3% |
0.09300341 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
111 |
9.5% |
0.09470990 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
168 |
14.3% |
0.14334471 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01194539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage of a government comprising three levels: That power is divided between the different levels of government.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has a system of government comprising three levels – the national, the regional (counties) and the municipal (municipality) level of government.
We want to know how advantageous or disadvantageous you find the following aspects of having multiple levels of government.
|
|
Literal question:
|
That power is divided between the different levels of government.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very advantageous |
532 |
45.4% |
0.45392491 |
| 2 |
Slightly advantageous |
421 |
35.9% |
0.35921502 |
| 3 |
Slightly disadvantageous |
141 |
12% |
0.12030717 |
| 4 |
Very disadvantageous |
43 |
3.7% |
0.03668942 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
3% |
0.02986348 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage of a government comprising three levels: To allow the implementation of different laws adapted to the various needs and conditions in different parts of Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has a system of government comprising three levels – the national, the regional (counties) and the municipal (municipality) level of government.
We want to know how advantageous or disadvantageous you find the following aspects of having multiple levels of government.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To allow the implementation of different laws adapted to the various needs and conditions in different parts of Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very advantageous |
226 |
19.3% |
0.19283276 |
| 2 |
Slightly advantageous |
468 |
39.9% |
0.39931741 |
| 3 |
Slightly disadvantageous |
237 |
20.2% |
0.20221843 |
| 4 |
Very disadvantageous |
203 |
17.3% |
0.17320819 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
3.2% |
0.03242321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage of a government comprising three levels: That different levels of governance can hold each other accountable for problems.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has a system of government comprising three levels – the national, the regional (counties) and the municipal (municipality) level of government.
We want to know how advantageous or disadvantageous you find the following aspects of having multiple levels of government.
|
|
Literal question:
|
That different levels of governance can hold each other accountable for problems.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very advantageous |
239 |
20.4% |
0.20392491 |
| 2 |
Slightly advantageous |
494 |
42.2% |
0.42150171 |
| 3 |
Slightly disadvantageous |
286 |
24.4% |
0.24402730 |
| 4 |
Very disadvantageous |
111 |
9.5% |
0.09470990 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
3.6% |
0.03583618 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr3_4
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage of a government comprising three levels: To allow the authorities in different parts of Norway to be involved in decisions concerning national issues.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has a system of government comprising three levels – the national, the regional (counties) and the municipal (municipality) level of government.
We want to know how advantageous or disadvantageous you find the following aspects of having multiple levels of government.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To allow the authorities in different parts of Norway to be involved in decisions concerning national issues.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very advantageous |
412 |
35.2% |
0.35153584 |
| 2 |
Slightly advantageous |
527 |
45% |
0.44965870 |
| 3 |
Slightly disadvantageous |
136 |
11.6% |
0.11604096 |
| 4 |
Very disadvantageous |
58 |
4.9% |
0.04948805 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
39 |
3.3% |
0.03327645 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr3_5
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage of a government comprising three levels: That different levels of governance can discuss how to best resolve specific problems.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has a system of government comprising three levels – the national, the regional (counties) and the municipal (municipality) level of government.
We want to know how advantageous or disadvantageous you find the following aspects of having multiple levels of government.
|
|
Literal question:
|
That different levels of governance can discuss how to best resolve specific problems.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very advantageous |
609 |
52% |
0.51962457 |
| 2 |
Slightly advantageous |
428 |
36.5% |
0.36518771 |
| 3 |
Slightly disadvantageous |
74 |
6.3% |
0.06313993 |
| 4 |
Very disadvantageous |
25 |
2.1% |
0.02133106 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
3.1% |
0.03071672 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr3_6
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage of a government comprising three levels: That different levels of governance are compelled to respect each other’s roles and responsibilities when addressing problems.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has a system of government comprising three levels – the national, the regional (counties) and the municipal (municipality) level of government.
We want to know how advantageous or disadvantageous you find the following aspects of having multiple levels of government.
|
|
Literal question:
|
That different levels of governance are compelled to respect each other’s roles and responsibilities when addressing problems.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very advantageous |
458 |
39.1% |
0.39078498 |
| 2 |
Slightly advantageous |
509 |
43.4% |
0.43430034 |
| 3 |
Slightly disadvantageous |
125 |
10.7% |
0.10665529 |
| 4 |
Very disadvantageous |
42 |
3.6% |
0.03583618 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
3.2% |
0.03242321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1163 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2a_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a municipal council representative: Control the decisions of the [chairmanship/city council] of your municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a municipal council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Control and monitor the decisions and actions of the [chairmanship/city council] of your municipality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 1 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
319 |
29.4% |
0.293738490 |
| 2 |
Important |
466 |
42.9% |
0.429097606 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
187 |
17.2% |
0.172191529 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
66 |
6.1% |
0.060773481 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
5 |
0.5% |
0.004604052 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
4% |
0.039594843 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2a_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a municipal council representative: Monitor the decisions of your county authority
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a municipal council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Monitor the decisions and actions of your county authority.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 1 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
123 |
11.3% |
0.11325967 |
| 2 |
Important |
390 |
35.9% |
0.35911602 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
327 |
30.1% |
0.30110497 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
177 |
16.3% |
0.16298343 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
25 |
2.3% |
0.02302026 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
4.1% |
0.04051565 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2a_3
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a municipal council representative: Monitor the decision the national government
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a municipal council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Monitor the decisions and actions of the national government.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 1 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
133 |
12.2% |
0.12246777 |
| 2 |
Important |
373 |
34.3% |
0.34346225 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
363 |
33.4% |
0.33425414 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
147 |
13.5% |
0.13535912 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
27 |
2.5% |
0.02486188 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
4% |
0.03959484 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2a_4
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a municipal council representative: Influence the political priorities of the [chairmanship/city council] of your municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a municipal council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Influence the main political priorities of the [chairmanship/city council] of your municipality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 1 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
505 |
46.5% |
0.465009208 |
| 2 |
Important |
447 |
41.2% |
0.411602210 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
80 |
7.4% |
0.073664825 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
10 |
0.9% |
0.009208103 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002762431 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
3.8% |
0.037753223 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2a_5
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a municipal council representative: Propose new policies for your municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a municipal council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Propose new policies for your municipality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 1 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
465 |
42.8% |
0.428176796 |
| 2 |
Important |
416 |
38.3% |
0.383057090 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
131 |
12.1% |
0.120626151 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
26 |
2.4% |
0.023941068 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006445672 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
3.8% |
0.037753223 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2a_6
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a municipal council representative: Influence municipal policy with the views of your municipal party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a municipal council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Influence the implementation of municipal policy so that it is more in line with the views of your municipal party.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 1 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
465 |
42.8% |
0.428176796 |
| 2 |
Important |
466 |
42.9% |
0.429097606 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
101 |
9.3% |
0.093001842 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
9 |
0.8% |
0.008287293 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
4 |
0.4% |
0.003683241 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
3.8% |
0.037753223 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2a_7
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a municipal council representative: Influence municipal policy with the views of your national party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a municipal council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Influence the implementation of municipal policy so that it is more in line with the views of your national party.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 1 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
168 |
15.5% |
0.15469613 |
| 2 |
Important |
411 |
37.8% |
0.37845304 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
326 |
30% |
0.30018416 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
107 |
9.9% |
0.09852670 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
32 |
2.9% |
0.02946593 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
3.9% |
0.03867403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2a_8
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a municipal council representative: Influence municipal policy with the preferences of the inhabitants in your municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a municipal council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Influence the implementation of municipal policy so that it is more in line with the preferences of the inhabitants in your municipality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 1 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
358 |
33% |
0.329650092 |
| 2 |
Important |
539 |
49.6% |
0.496316759 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
132 |
12.2% |
0.121546961 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
12 |
1.1% |
0.011049724 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002762431 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
3.9% |
0.038674033 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2a_9
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a municipal council representative: Influence national government policy with the preferences of inhabitants in your municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a municipal council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Influence the implementation of national government policy so that it is more in line with the preferences of inhabitants in your municipality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 1 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
228 |
21% |
0.20994475 |
| 2 |
Important |
457 |
42.1% |
0.42081031 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
265 |
24.4% |
0.24401473 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
80 |
7.4% |
0.07366483 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
14 |
1.3% |
0.01289134 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
3.9% |
0.03867403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2b_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a county council representative: Check the decisions of the [county executive board/county council] in your county
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a county council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Check and monitor the decisions and actions of the [county executive board/county council] in your county.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 2 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
18 |
20.9% |
0.20930233 |
| 2 |
Important |
34 |
39.5% |
0.39534884 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
22 |
25.6% |
0.25581395 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
4 |
4.7% |
0.04651163 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
6 |
7% |
0.06976744 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2b_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a county council representative: Monitor the decisions of the municipalities in your county
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a county council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Monitor the decisions and actions of the municipalities in your county.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 2 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
7 |
8.1% |
0.08139535 |
| 2 |
Important |
20 |
23.3% |
0.23255814 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
26 |
30.2% |
0.30232558 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
26 |
30.2% |
0.30232558 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
6 |
7% |
0.06976744 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2b_3
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a county council representative: Monitor the decisions of the national government
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a county council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Monitor the decisions and actions of the national government.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 2 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
18 |
20.9% |
0.20930233 |
| 2 |
Important |
27 |
31.4% |
0.31395349 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
25 |
29.1% |
0.29069767 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
10 |
11.6% |
0.11627907 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
4 |
4.7% |
0.04651163 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2b_4
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a county council representative: Influence the political priorities of the [county executive board/county council] in your county
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a county council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Influence the main political priorities of the [county executive board/county council] in your county.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 2 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
39 |
45.3% |
0.45348837 |
| 2 |
Important |
35 |
40.7% |
0.40697674 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
6 |
7% |
0.06976744 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
3 |
3.5% |
0.03488372 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
3.5% |
0.03488372 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2b_5
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a county council representative: Propose new policies for your county
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a county council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Propose new policies for your county.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 2 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
54 |
62.8% |
0.62790698 |
| 2 |
Important |
30 |
34.9% |
0.34883721 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2b_6
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a county council representative: Influence county policy with the views of your county party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a county council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Influence the implementation of county policy so that it is more in line with the views of your county party.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 2 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
50 |
58.1% |
0.58139535 |
| 2 |
Important |
29 |
33.7% |
0.33720930 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
4 |
4.7% |
0.04651163 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2b_7
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a county council representative: Influence county policy with the views of your national party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a county council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Influence the implementation of county policy so that it is more in line with the views of your national party.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 2 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
30 |
34.9% |
0.34883721 |
| 2 |
Important |
35 |
40.7% |
0.40697674 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
17 |
19.8% |
0.19767442 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
3 |
3.5% |
0.03488372 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2b_8
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a county council representative: Influence county policy with the preferences of the inhabitants in your county
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a county council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Influence the implementation of county policy so that it is more in line with the preferences of the inhabitants in your county.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 2 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
22 |
25.6% |
0.25581395 |
| 2 |
Important |
44 |
51.2% |
0.51162791 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
18 |
20.9% |
0.20930233 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2249 |
|
NA |
p7pertdr2b_9
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you as a county council representative: Influence national government policy with the preferences of inhabitants in your county
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of tasks that can be part of your job as a county council representative. How important are the following tasks for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Influence the implementation of national government policy so that it is more in line with the preferences of inhabitants in your county.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7P6 = 2 & p7group = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
20 |
23.3% |
0.23255814 |
| 2 |
Important |
40 |
46.5% |
0.46511628 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
22 |
25.6% |
0.25581395 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2249 |
|
NA |
p7pergender_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent is exposed to [p7gender3a] or [p7gender3b] first.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2286] [Invalid:49] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
p7pergender3a is posed first |
1166 |
51% |
0.5100612 |
| 2 |
p7pergender3b is posed first |
1120 |
49% |
0.4899388 |
| Sysmiss |
|
49 |
|
NA |
p7pergender3a
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would you say that you had female characteristics?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Occasionally, individuals can be referred to as having female and/or male characteristics.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you say that you had female characteristics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked][Posed on the same page as p7pergender3b][If [p7pergender_ran == 1] the respondent was exposed to p7pergender3a first]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 = "I have no female characteristics" |
306 |
13.1% |
0.13104925 |
| 1 |
1 |
203 |
8.7% |
0.08693790 |
| 2 |
2 |
326 |
14% |
0.13961456 |
| 3 |
3 |
305 |
13.1% |
0.13062099 |
| 4 |
4 |
157 |
6.7% |
0.06723769 |
| 5 |
5 |
223 |
9.6% |
0.09550321 |
| 6 |
6 |
130 |
5.6% |
0.05567452 |
| 7 |
7 |
209 |
9% |
0.08950749 |
| 8 |
8 |
192 |
8.2% |
0.08222698 |
| 9 |
9 |
102 |
4.4% |
0.04368308 |
| 10 |
10 = "I have only female characteristics" |
77 |
3.3% |
0.03297645 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
105 |
4.5% |
0.04496788 |
p7pergender3b
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would you say that you had male characteristics?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Occasionally, individuals can be referred to as having female and/or male characteristics.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you say that you had male characteristics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked][Posed on the same page as p7pergender3a][If [p7pergender_ran == 2] the respondent was exposed to p7pergender3b first]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 = "I have no male characteristics" |
98 |
4.2% |
0.04197002 |
| 1 |
1 |
83 |
3.6% |
0.03554604 |
| 2 |
2 |
132 |
5.7% |
0.05653105 |
| 3 |
3 |
175 |
7.5% |
0.07494647 |
| 4 |
4 |
131 |
5.6% |
0.05610278 |
| 5 |
5 |
234 |
10% |
0.10021413 |
| 6 |
6 |
183 |
7.8% |
0.07837259 |
| 7 |
7 |
326 |
14% |
0.13961456 |
| 8 |
8 |
426 |
18.2% |
0.18244111 |
| 9 |
9 |
208 |
8.9% |
0.08907923 |
| 10 |
10 = "I have only male characteristics" |
231 |
9.9% |
0.09892934 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
108 |
4.6% |
0.04625268 |
p7perearth1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in [p7perearth1].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1145] [Invalid:1190] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
590 |
51.5% |
0.5152838 |
| 1 |
m It has been reported that two thirds of Norway’s ice mass will disappear
within the next 70 –100 years (source: link 1) |
555 |
48.5% |
0.4847162 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1190 |
|
NA |
p7perearth1_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in [p7perearth1].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1145] [Invalid:1190] [Range:0-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
393 |
34.3% |
0.3432314 |
| 1 |
which can supply Norwegian industry |
386 |
33.7% |
0.3371179 |
| 2 |
which can supplement energy supply in Europe |
366 |
32% |
0.3196507 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1190 |
|
NA |
p7perearth1_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in [p7perearth1].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
[Experiment. When p7perearth1_ran3 is randomly assigned to ‘0’, then p7perearth1_ran4 will also be assigned to ‘0’.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1145] [Invalid:1190] [Range:0-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
487 |
42.5% |
0.4253275 |
| 1 |
One argument in favour of this is that it creates more jobs in local government. |
226 |
19.7% |
0.1973799 |
| 2 |
One argument in favour of this is that it helps protect against floods that
occur as a consequence of extreme weather. |
216 |
18.9% |
0.1886463 |
| 3 |
One argument in favour of this is that it helps reduce Norway’s reliance on oil
revenues. |
216 |
18.9% |
0.1886463 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1190 |
|
NA |
p7perearth1_ran4
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns an element for textpiping in [p7perearth1].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p7group = 1]
[Experiment. When p7perearth1_ran4 is randomly assigned to ‘0’, then p7perearth1_ran3 will also be assigned to ‘0’.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1145] [Invalid:1190] [Range:0-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
487 |
42.5% |
0.4253275 |
| 1 |
One argument against this is that it results in developments that change the
landscape. |
211 |
18.4% |
0.1842795 |
| 2 |
One argument against this is that flora and fauna will be irreparably damaged. |
235 |
20.5% |
0.2052402 |
| 3 |
One argument against this is the significant cost of building a hydroelectric
power plant. |
212 |
18.5% |
0.1851528 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1190 |
|
NA |
p7perearth1
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: construct a hydroelectric power plant
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a consequence of climate change, glaciers throughout the world are melting, including in Norway. [p7perearth1_ran1]
Imagine a municipality in Norway with such a glacier. When it melts, new water reservoirs become available. It is therefore been proposed that a new hydroelectric power plant is built to produce renewable energy[p7perearth1_ran2].
[p7perearth1_ran3]
[p7perearth1_ran4]
Imagine that you were involved in making a decision regarding the hydroelectric power plant.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you support or oppose building such a hydroelectric power plant?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
157 |
13.5% |
0.13499570 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
340 |
29.2% |
0.29234738 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
316 |
27.2% |
0.27171109 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
100 |
8.6% |
0.08598452 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
106 |
9.1% |
0.09114359 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
79 |
6.8% |
0.06792777 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
38 |
3.3% |
0.03267412 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2.3% |
0.02321582 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7perearth1_onclick
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Collects whether the respondent has accessed the link in the second alternative in [p7perearth1_ran1]. The link is only available to respondents which has [p7perearth1_ran1 == 1].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:integer] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2335] [Range:-]
|
p7perearth2b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Significantly reduce international flights
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Glaciers melt as a result of climate change (source: link 1) and this can be prevented to some extent if we change our lifestyles.
To what extent do you support or oppose political regulation for the following purposes to contribute to this:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Significantly reduce international flights
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you require further information about the effect that lifestyle change can have on climate change, see the report from the Norwegian Environment Agency (link 2).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perearth2_ran = 2, 3 & p7group = 1]
[Link 1 (NVE): https://www.nve.no/vann-og-vassdrag/vannets-kretslop/bre/breer-og-klima/][Link 2 (Miljødirektoratet): https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/2020/januar-2020/klimakur2030/]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
88 |
11% |
0.11000 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
171 |
21.4% |
0.21375 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
281 |
35.1% |
0.35125 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
89 |
11.1% |
0.11125 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
63 |
7.9% |
0.07875 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
48 |
6% |
0.06000 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
34 |
4.3% |
0.04250 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
3.2% |
0.03250 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1535 |
|
NA |
p7perearth2b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Significantly reduce the number of non-electric cars
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Glaciers melt as a result of climate change (source: link 1) and this can be prevented to some extent if we change our lifestyles.
To what extent do you support or oppose political regulation for the following purposes to contribute to this:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Significantly reduce the number of non-electric cars
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you require further information about the effect that lifestyle change can have on climate change, see the report from the Norwegian Environment Agency (link 2).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perearth2_ran = 2, 3 & p7group = 1]
[Link 1 (NVE): https://www.nve.no/vann-og-vassdrag/vannets-kretslop/bre/breer-og-klima/][Link 2 (Miljødirektoratet): https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/2020/januar-2020/klimakur2030/]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
82 |
10.2% |
0.10250 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
182 |
22.8% |
0.22750 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
211 |
26.4% |
0.26375 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
102 |
12.8% |
0.12750 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
95 |
11.9% |
0.11875 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
53 |
6.6% |
0.06625 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
49 |
6.1% |
0.06125 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
3.2% |
0.03250 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1535 |
|
NA |
p7perearth2b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Significantly reduce the use of disposable items
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Glaciers melt as a result of climate change (source: link 1) and this can be prevented to some extent if we change our lifestyles.
To what extent do you support or oppose political regulation for the following purposes to contribute to this:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Significantly reduce the use of disposable items
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you require further information about the effect that lifestyle change can have on climate change, see the report from the Norwegian Environment Agency (link 2).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perearth2_ran = 2, 3 & p7group = 1]
[Link 1 (NVE): https://www.nve.no/vann-og-vassdrag/vannets-kretslop/bre/breer-og-klima/][Link 2 (Miljødirektoratet): https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/2020/januar-2020/klimakur2030/]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
243 |
30.4% |
0.30375 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
295 |
36.9% |
0.36875 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
149 |
18.6% |
0.18625 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
45 |
5.6% |
0.05625 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
27 |
3.4% |
0.03375 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
6 |
0.7% |
0.00750 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
10 |
1.3% |
0.01250 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
3.1% |
0.03125 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1535 |
|
NA |
p7perearth2b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Encourage a more plant-based diet by taxing and subsidising foods
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Glaciers melt as a result of climate change (source: link 1) and this can be prevented to some extent if we change our lifestyles.
To what extent do you support or oppose political regulation for the following purposes to contribute to this:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Encourage a more plant-based diet by taxing and subsidising foods
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you require further information about the effect that lifestyle change can have on climate change, see the report from the Norwegian Environment Agency (link 2).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perearth2_ran = 2, 3 & p7group = 1]
[Link 1 (NVE): https://www.nve.no/vann-og-vassdrag/vannets-kretslop/bre/breer-og-klima/][Link 2 (Miljødirektoratet): https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/2020/januar-2020/klimakur2030/]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
45 |
5.6% |
0.05625 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
85 |
10.6% |
0.10625 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
186 |
23.2% |
0.23250 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
123 |
15.4% |
0.15375 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
125 |
15.6% |
0.15625 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
108 |
13.5% |
0.13500 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
103 |
12.9% |
0.12875 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
3.1% |
0.03125 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1535 |
|
NA |
p7perearth2b_5
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Encourage a more plant-based diet by providing useful information about how this can be achieved in a healthy way
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Glaciers melt as a result of climate change (source: link 1) and this can be prevented to some extent if we change our lifestyles.
To what extent do you support or oppose political regulation for the following purposes to contribute to this:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Encourage a more plant-based diet by providing useful information about how this can be achieved in a healthy way
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you require further information about the effect that lifestyle change can have on climate change, see the report from the Norwegian Environment Agency (link 2).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7perearth2_ran = 2, 3 & p7group = 1]
[Link 1 (NVE): https://www.nve.no/vann-og-vassdrag/vannets-kretslop/bre/breer-og-klima/][Link 2 (Miljødirektoratet): https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/2020/januar-2020/klimakur2030/]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
130 |
16.2% |
0.16250 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
156 |
19.5% |
0.19500 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
206 |
25.8% |
0.25750 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
115 |
14.4% |
0.14375 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
68 |
8.5% |
0.08500 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
54 |
6.8% |
0.06750 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
47 |
5.9% |
0.05875 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
3% |
0.03000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1535 |
|
NA |
p7perurban
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
In this context, we are thinking about Norwegian conditions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A large city |
137 |
5.9% |
0.05867238 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a big city |
168 |
7.2% |
0.07194861 |
| 3 |
A small or medium-sized city |
641 |
27.5% |
0.27451820 |
| 4 |
A village |
714 |
30.6% |
0.30578158 |
| 5 |
A sparsely populated area |
604 |
25.9% |
0.25867238 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
3% |
0.03040685 |
p7per34
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001713062 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or
lower secondary school) |
62 |
2.7% |
0.026552463 |
| 3 |
Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School, business college) |
133 |
5.7% |
0.056959315 |
| 4 |
Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2,
VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) |
251 |
10.7% |
0.107494647 |
| 5 |
Craft training (e.g. vocational school, technical school/college, maritime
vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot training, secretary school,
home industry school/handicrafts school, master craftsman certificate training) |
234 |
10% |
0.100214133 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university
college graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
256 |
11% |
0.109635974 |
| 7 |
College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime
subjects, aviation subjects, military subjects etc.) |
459 |
19.7% |
0.196573876 |
| 8 |
University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) |
191 |
8.2% |
0.081798715 |
| 9 |
University college – 5-6 year education (MA, subject at second degree level or
longer vocational education on a university college level) |
247 |
10.6% |
0.105781585 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered
engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) |
379 |
16.2% |
0.162312634 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
40 |
1.7% |
0.017130621 |
| 12 |
None of these (describe): |
13 |
0.6% |
0.005567452 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
66 |
2.8% |
0.028265525 |
p7per34_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
None of these: describe
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2335] [Range:-]
|
p7perincome
|
Variable label:
|
What was the total income of your family in 2021?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What was the total income of your family in 2021?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are referring here to work income plus pension income, capital income, share dividends, and all other forms of income during the year.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than NOK 100,000 |
7 |
0.3% |
0.0029978587 |
| 2 |
NOK 100,000–250,000 |
19 |
0.8% |
0.0081370450 |
| 3 |
NOK 250,001–400,000 |
77 |
3.3% |
0.0329764454 |
| 4 |
NOK 400,001–550,000 |
161 |
6.9% |
0.0689507495 |
| 5 |
NOK 550,001–700,000 |
276 |
11.8% |
0.1182012848 |
| 6 |
NOK 700,001–800,000 |
196 |
8.4% |
0.0839400428 |
| 7 |
NOK 800,001–900,000 |
199 |
8.5% |
0.0852248394 |
| 8 |
NOK 900,001–1,000,000 |
183 |
7.8% |
0.0783725910 |
| 9 |
NOK 1,000,001–1,300,000 |
463 |
19.8% |
0.1982869379 |
| 10 |
NOK 1,300,001–1,600,000 |
345 |
14.8% |
0.1477516060 |
| 11 |
NOK 1,600,001–2,000,000 |
196 |
8.4% |
0.0839400428 |
| 12 |
NOK 2,000,001–3,000,000 |
78 |
3.3% |
0.0334047109 |
| 13 |
NOK 3,000,001–5,000,000 |
23 |
1% |
0.0098501071 |
| 14 |
NOK 5,000,001–10,000,000 |
6 |
0.3% |
0.0025695931 |
| 15 |
Over NOK 10,000,000 |
1 |
0% |
0.0004282655 |
| 16 |
Don’t know |
34 |
1.5% |
0.0145610278 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
3% |
0.0304068522 |
p7perwealth
|
Variable label:
|
What was the total assets of your household in 2021?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What was the total assets of your household in 2021?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are referring to the value of your house plus the value of any vehicles, second homes, stocks and mutual funds, savings accounts, retirement accounts and all other assets, minus what is owed on mortgages, car loans and other debts.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p7group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than NOK 50,000 |
153 |
13.2% |
0.131556320 |
| 2 |
NOK 50,000–200,000 |
61 |
5.2% |
0.052450559 |
| 3 |
NOK 200,001–400,000 |
69 |
5.9% |
0.059329321 |
| 4 |
NOK 400,001–750,000 |
63 |
5.4% |
0.054170249 |
| 5 |
NOK 750,001–1,000,000 |
60 |
5.2% |
0.051590714 |
| 6 |
NOK 1,000,001–1,500,000 |
80 |
6.9% |
0.068787618 |
| 7 |
NOK 1,500,001–2,500,000 |
145 |
12.5% |
0.124677558 |
| 8 |
NOK 2,500,001–5,000,000 |
241 |
20.7% |
0.207222700 |
| 9 |
NOK 5,000,001–10,000,000 |
113 |
9.7% |
0.097162511 |
| 10 |
NOK 10,000,001–20,000,000 |
48 |
4.1% |
0.041272571 |
| 11 |
NOK 20,000,001–30,000,000 |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003439381 |
| 12 |
NOK 30,000,001–40,000,000 |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005159071 |
| 13 |
NOK 40,000,001–50,000,000 |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002579536 |
| 14 |
NOK 50,000,001–100,000,000 |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005159071 |
| 15 |
Over NOK 100,000,000 |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004299226 |
| 16 |
Don’t know |
75 |
6.4% |
0.064488392 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.7% |
0.026655202 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1172 |
|
NA |
p7avslutt
|
Variable label:
|
Closing comments
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2335] [Range:-]
|
p7P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1464 |
62.7% |
0.6269807 |
| 2 |
Female |
871 |
37.3% |
0.3730193 |
p7P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region where the representative is elected
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
25 |
1.1% |
0.010706638 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
899 |
38.5% |
0.385010707 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
163 |
7% |
0.069807281 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
700 |
30% |
0.299785867 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
201 |
8.6% |
0.086081370 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
342 |
14.6% |
0.146466809 |
| 99 |
Not relevant |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002141328 |
p7P3
|
Variable label:
|
County where the representative is elected
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:3-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
25 |
1.1% |
0.010706638 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
192 |
8.2% |
0.082226981 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
196 |
8.4% |
0.083940043 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
183 |
7.8% |
0.078372591 |
| 30 |
Viken |
434 |
18.6% |
0.185867238 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
256 |
11% |
0.109635974 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
209 |
9% |
0.089507495 |
| 42 |
Agder |
163 |
7% |
0.069807281 |
| 46 |
Vestlandet |
312 |
13.4% |
0.133618844 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
201 |
8.6% |
0.086081370 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
159 |
6.8% |
0.068094218 |
| 99 |
Not relevant |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002141328 |
p7P3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Municipality
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:301-99999]
|
p7P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education (condensed)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
69 |
3% |
0.02955032 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
629 |
26.9% |
0.26937901 |
| 3 |
University/University College |
1593 |
68.2% |
0.68222698 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
1.9% |
0.01884368 |
p7P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education (expanded)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001713062 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
65 |
2.8% |
0.027837259 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
136 |
5.8% |
0.058244111 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
257 |
11% |
0.110064240 |
| 5 |
Craft training (e.g. vocational school, technical school/college, maritime
vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot training, secretary school,
home industry school/handicrafts school, master craftsman certificate training) |
236 |
10.1% |
0.101070664 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
261 |
11.2% |
0.111777302 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
468 |
20% |
0.200428266 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
191 |
8.2% |
0.081798715 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
248 |
10.6% |
0.106209850 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
385 |
16.5% |
0.164882227 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
40 |
1.7% |
0.017130621 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
13 |
0.6% |
0.005567452 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.3% |
0.013276231 |
p7P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (expanded)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2264] [Invalid:71] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1949 or earlier |
191 |
8.4% |
0.08436396 |
| 2 |
1950-1959 |
554 |
24.5% |
0.24469965 |
| 3 |
1960-1969 |
688 |
30.4% |
0.30388693 |
| 4 |
1970-1979 |
479 |
21.2% |
0.21157244 |
| 5 |
1980-1989 |
241 |
10.6% |
0.10644876 |
| 6 |
1990 or later |
111 |
4.9% |
0.04902827 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| Sysmiss |
|
71 |
|
NA |
p7P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (condensed)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2264] [Invalid:71] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
745 |
32.9% |
0.32906360 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
1408 |
62.2% |
0.62190813 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
111 |
4.9% |
0.04902827 |
| Sysmiss |
|
71 |
|
NA |
p7P6
|
Variable label:
|
Administrative level to which the representative is elected
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Municipality |
2184 |
93.5% |
0.935331906 |
| 2 |
County |
86 |
3.7% |
0.036830835 |
| 3 |
Parliament |
60 |
2.6% |
0.025695931 |
| 4 |
The Sami Parliament |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002141328 |
p7P7
|
Variable label:
|
Party affiliation
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
59 |
2.5% |
0.025267666 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
149 |
6.4% |
0.063811563 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party |
637 |
27.3% |
0.272805139 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
457 |
19.6% |
0.195717345 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
93 |
4% |
0.039828694 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democrats |
114 |
4.9% |
0.048822270 |
| 7 |
The Liberal Party |
82 |
3.5% |
0.035117773 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party |
368 |
15.8% |
0.157601713 |
| 9 |
The Progress Party |
146 |
6.3% |
0.062526767 |
| 10 |
Other |
222 |
9.5% |
0.095074946 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.3% |
0.003426124 |
