Codebook

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Round 1

v-102 - 2023-11-06









Produced by ideas2evidence










Citation

Primary investigators

Name Affiliation
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten Coordinator, University of Bergen
Mette Andersson, Sveinung Arnesen, Gisela Böhm, Dag Elgesem, Odd Gåsdal, Kristin Strømsnes, Endre Tvinnereim, and Jacob Aars Scientific Team, University of Bergen and Rokkansenteret

Producers

Name Affiliation Role
Jostein Ryssevik ideas2evidence Quality assurance
Asle Høgestøl ideas2evidence Coordinator
Øivind Skjervheim ideas2evidence Researcher

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no

Scope

Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

Based on international literature the panel recruitment process was expected to have a success rate of approximately 14 percent. In order to reach our minimum target of 3 500 respondents we therefore had to draw a gross sample of 25 000 individuals.

The sample was drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. This register includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.

25 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.

Furthermore, all individuals over the age of 95 were excluded from the sample. This amounted to 58 persons, thus leaving a net sample of 24 942 individuals before the recruitment process started.

In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1).

Mode of Data Collection

Panel members were recruited per post in two steps.

First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters contained the following information; a) a description of the project, b) the Citizen Panel’s policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the anonymity of the participators, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the participants’ rights to opt out of the panel at any time in the future, e) contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a unique log-in id and the web address to the panel’s web site and g) the estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).

In order to maximize the response rate, an incentive in the form of a travel gift card was included in the project. The value of the gift card was 25 000 NOK. To enter the lottery respondents were required to join the panel and provide their e-mail addresses. Respondents were asked to register on the panel’s web site and log into the survey using the unique id-code provided in their personal letter. Information on the lottery was included in all correspondence with respondents.

The letter was posted on the 6th of November 2013.

A reminder post card was sent on the 22nd of November 2013 to those respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b) had neither completed the survey nor provided their e-mail address. Respondents were encouraged to join the panel, with reference to the letter sent two weeks prior. The unique log-in id provided in the original letter was also included in the post card.

A reminder e-mail was sent on the 25th of November to those respondents who had provided their e-mail addresses, but had not yet completed the survey.

Wave1 was closed on the 05th of January 2014.

Weighting

To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix).

When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different weights have been calculated:

When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset. We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample. An illustration of this is provided in table 5 which shows the effect of weight 2 on the distribution of self-reported level of education in the net sample:


Change Log

Version Release date / Date changed Variable Changes and notes
v-102 2023-11-06 NA Revised release of round 1
NA 2023-11-02 w01_Weight4 New variable: Added w01_Weight4
NA 2023-11-02 w01_Weight4 Variable documentation inserted
v-101 2020-06-15 NA Revised release of round 1
NA 2020-06-12 w01_k23a Variable documentation updated
NA 2020-06-11 w01_comment Variable documentation updated
NA 2020-06-09 w01_k26 Variable documentation updated
NA 2020-06-09 w01_dt14 Variable documentation updated
NA 2020-06-09 w01_dt15 Variable documentation updated
NA 2019-08-12 w01_k7 Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
NA 2019-08-12 w01_k11 Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
NA 2018-11-07 w01_k9_1_sak1_kod Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA 2018-11-07 w01_k9_2_sak2_kod Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA 2018-11-07 w01_k9_3_sak3_kod Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA 2018-04-13 w01_p5_1 Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
NA 2018-04-13 w01_p5_2 Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
NA 2017-06-14 w01p4_1 Updated value on 40 respondents.
NA 2017-06-14 w01p4_2 Updated value on 40 respondents.
NA 2016-05-06 w01_k23 Added anonymized data. Available on request.
NA 2014-05-12 w01_dv36_recode New variable w01_dv36 based on w01_dv36_recode
v-100 2014-01-17 NA Initial release of round 1


Dataset contents

File name Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 1 - v-102-O.sav
Distribution type Public
# Cases 4905
# Variables 332


Variable Documentation

responseid


Variable label: responseid
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_u


Variable label: Randomizes the respondents into two groups
Pre-question text: Randomizes the respondents into two groups. The two groups are asked questions common to them both, and questions unique to the group.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 u1 2471 50.4% 0.5037717
2 u2 2434 49.6% 0.4962283

w01_k1


Variable label: Interest in politics
Literal question: In general, how interested are you in politics?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 505 10.3% 0.102956167
2 Interested 2158 44.0% 0.439959225
3 Somewhat interested 1671 34.1% 0.340672783
4 Not interested 490 10.0% 0.099898063
5 Not interested at all 73 1.5% 0.014882773
97 No answer 8 0.2% 0.001630989

w01_k2


Variable label: Voted in the elections
Literal question: Did you vote at the parliamentary elections this autumn?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 4199 85.6% 0.856065240
2 No 682 13.9% 0.139041794
3 Don't remember 7 0.1% 0.001427115
97 No answer 17 0.3% 0.003465851

w01_k3


Variable label: Voted for following party
Literal question: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democratic Party 213 5.1% 0.05072636
2 The Conservative Party 1158 27.6% 0.27577995
3 The Progress Party 534 12.7% 0.12717314
4 The Liberal Party 291 6.9% 0.06930221
5 The Socialist Left Party 263 6.3% 0.06263396
6 The Centre Party 175 4.2% 0.04167659
7 The Green Party 171 4.1% 0.04072398
8 The Labour Party 1188 28.3% 0.28292451
9 Red 80 1.9% 0.01905216
10 Other: 67 1.6% 0.01595618
97 No answer 59 1.4% 0.01405096
98 Not asked 706 NA

w01_k3_10_other


Variable label: Text: Voted for following party [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k4


Variable label: Time of choosing party
Literal question: When did you decide to vote for the party or list you chose?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Before the election campaign 2749 65.5% 0.65467969
2 During the election campaign 1041 24.8% 0.24791617
3 On the day of the election 335 8.0% 0.07978090
97 No answer 74 1.8% 0.01762324
98 Not asked 706 NA

w01_k5_1


Variable label: Reasons not to vote in elections: too small differences between parties
Pre-question text: There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
Literal question: The differences between the parties are too minor
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 51 7.5% 0.07478006
2 Important 98 14.4% 0.14369501
3 Somewhat important 130 19.1% 0.19061584
4 Not very important 84 12.3% 0.12316716
5 Not important at all 125 18.3% 0.18328446
97 No answer 194 28.4% 0.28445748
98 Not asked 4223 NA

w01_k5_2


Variable label: Reasons not to vote in elections: not committed to important issues
Pre-question text: There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
Literal question: I am not committed to any important issues
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 33 4.8% 0.0483871
2 Important 75 11.0% 0.1099707
3 Somewhat important 121 17.7% 0.1774194
4 Not very important 93 13.6% 0.1363636
5 Not important at all 157 23.0% 0.2302053
97 No answer 203 29.8% 0.2976540
98 Not asked 4223 NA

w01_k5_3


Variable label: Reasons not to vote in elections: not familiar with issues
Pre-question text: There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
Literal question: I am not familiar enough with what the parties represent
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 89 13.0% 0.13049853
2 Important 135 19.8% 0.19794721
3 Somewhat important 97 14.2% 0.14222874
4 Not very important 63 9.2% 0.09237537
5 Not important at all 119 17.4% 0.17448680
97 No answer 179 26.2% 0.26246334
98 Not asked 4223 NA

w01_k5_4


Variable label: Reasons not to vote in elections: lacking confidence in politicians
Pre-question text: There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
Literal question: I lack confidence in politicians
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 118 17.3% 0.17302053
2 Important 116 17.0% 0.17008798
3 Somewhat important 101 14.8% 0.14809384
4 Not very important 55 8.1% 0.08064516
5 Not important at all 117 17.2% 0.17155425
97 No answer 175 25.7% 0.25659824
98 Not asked 4223 NA

w01_k5_5


Variable label: Reasons not to vote in elections: lack of time
Pre-question text: There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
Literal question: I didn’t have the time or opportunity
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 125 18.3% 0.18328446
2 Important 75 11.0% 0.10997067
3 Somewhat important 72 10.6% 0.10557185
4 Not very important 64 9.4% 0.09384164
5 Not important at all 184 27.0% 0.26979472
97 No answer 162 23.8% 0.23753666
98 Not asked 4223 NA

w01_k6_1


Variable label: Like or dislike party: Christian Democratic Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Christian Democratic Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly dislike 338 6.9% 0.06890928
2 Somewhat dislike 571 11.6% 0.11641182
3 Somewhat dislike 1084 22.1% 0.22099898
4 Neither dislike nor like 1197 24.4% 0.24403670
5 Somewhat like 1015 20.7% 0.20693170
6 Significantly like 365 7.4% 0.07441386
7 Strongly like 73 1.5% 0.01488277
97 No answer 262 5.3% 0.05341488

w01_k6_2


Variable label: Like or dislike party: Conservative Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Conservative Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly dislike 118 2.4% 0.02405708
2 Somewhat dislike 375 7.6% 0.07645260
3 Somewhat dislike 728 14.8% 0.14841998
4 Neither dislike nor like 642 13.1% 0.13088685
5 Somewhat like 1224 25.0% 0.24954128
6 Significantly like 1191 24.3% 0.24281346
7 Strongly like 392 8.0% 0.07991845
97 No answer 235 4.8% 0.04791030

w01_k6_3


Variable label: Like or dislike party: Progress Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Progress Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly dislike 1086 22.1% 0.22140673
2 Somewhat dislike 827 16.9% 0.16860347
3 Somewhat dislike 677 13.8% 0.13802243
4 Neither dislike nor like 484 9.9% 0.09867482
5 Somewhat like 838 17.1% 0.17084608
6 Significantly like 515 10.5% 0.10499490
7 Strongly like 236 4.8% 0.04811417
97 No answer 242 4.9% 0.04933741

w01_k6_4


Variable label: Like or dislike party: Liberal Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Liberal Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly dislike 135 2.8% 0.02752294
2 Somewhat dislike 296 6.0% 0.06034659
3 Somewhat dislike 792 16.1% 0.16146789
4 Neither dislike nor like 1426 29.1% 0.29072375
5 Somewhat like 1320 26.9% 0.26911315
6 Significantly like 533 10.9% 0.10866463
7 Strongly like 125 2.5% 0.02548420
97 No answer 278 5.7% 0.05667686

w01_k6_5


Variable label: Like or dislike party: Socialist Left Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Socialist Left Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly dislike 681 13.9% 0.13883792
2 Somewhat dislike 768 15.7% 0.15657492
3 Somewhat dislike 772 15.7% 0.15739042
4 Neither dislike nor like 982 20.0% 0.20020387
5 Somewhat like 832 17.0% 0.16962283
6 Significantly like 441 9.0% 0.08990826
7 Strongly like 137 2.8% 0.02793068
97 No answer 292 6.0% 0.05953109

w01_k6_6


Variable label: Like or dislike party: Centre Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Centre Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly dislike 267 5.4% 0.05443425
2 Somewhat dislike 530 10.8% 0.10805301
3 Somewhat dislike 1049 21.4% 0.21386340
4 Neither dislike nor like 1559 31.8% 0.31783894
5 Somewhat like 917 18.7% 0.18695209
6 Significantly like 235 4.8% 0.04791030
7 Strongly like 57 1.2% 0.01162080
97 No answer 291 5.9% 0.05932722

w01_k6_7


Variable label: Like or dislike party: Green Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Green Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly dislike 349 7.1% 0.07115189
2 Somewhat dislike 391 8.0% 0.07971458
3 Somewhat dislike 630 12.8% 0.12844037
4 Neither dislike nor like 1588 32.4% 0.32375127
5 Somewhat like 1041 21.2% 0.21223242
6 Significantly like 478 9.7% 0.09745158
7 Strongly like 136 2.8% 0.02772681
97 No answer 292 6.0% 0.05953109

w01_k6_8


Variable label: Like or dislike party: Labour Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Labour Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly dislike 209 4.3% 0.04260958
2 Somewhat dislike 360 7.3% 0.07339450
3 Somewhat dislike 670 13.7% 0.13659531
4 Neither dislike nor like 631 12.9% 0.12864424
5 Somewhat like 1236 25.2% 0.25198777
6 Significantly like 1168 23.8% 0.23812436
7 Strongly like 401 8.2% 0.08175331
97 No answer 230 4.7% 0.04689093

w01_k6_9


Variable label: Like or dislike party: Red
Pre-question text: We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: Red
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly dislike 1076 21.9% 0.21936799
2 Somewhat dislike 794 16.2% 0.16187564
3 Somewhat dislike 743 15.1% 0.15147808
4 Neither dislike nor like 1205 24.6% 0.24566769
5 Somewhat like 548 11.2% 0.11172273
6 Significantly like 174 3.5% 0.03547401
7 Strongly like 69 1.4% 0.01406728
97 No answer 296 6.0% 0.06034659

w01_k7


Variable label: Satisfied with new Government
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the new Government of Norway?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 287 5.9% 0.05851172
2 Satisfied 1564 31.9% 0.31885831
3 Somewhat satisfied 1475 30.1% 0.30071356
4 Not very satisfied 1035 21.1% 0.21100917
5 Not satisfied at all 428 8.7% 0.08725790
97 No answer 116 2.4% 0.02364934

w01_dt19


Variable label: Anticipated red-green victory
Literal question: If you consider the period prior to the parliamentary elections in September, did you expect the red-green government to continue after the election?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 428 17.6% 0.1758422
2 No 1952 80.2% 0.8019721
97 Not asked 54 2.2% 0.0221857
98 No answer 2471 NA

w01_dt20


Variable label: Government coalition considered most likely
Literal question: In your opinion, which government did you consider to be most likely?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Conservative Party 94 4.8% 0.04815574
2 The Conservative Party and the Progress Party 675 34.6% 0.34579918
3 The Conservative Party, the Progress Party, the Christian Democratic Party and the Liberal Party 616 31.6% 0.31557377
4 The Conservative Party, the Progress Party and the Christian Democratic Party 148 7.6% 0.07581967
5 The Conservative Party, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party 171 8.8% 0.08760246
6 The Conservative Party, the Christian Democratic Party and the Liberal Party 138 7.1% 0.07069672
7 The Labour Party 51 2.6% 0.02612705
8 Other: 20 1.0% 0.01024590
97 No answer 39 2.0% 0.01997951
98 Not asked 2953 NA

w01_dt20_8_other


Variable label: Text: Government coalition considered most likely [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: In your opinion, which government did you consider to be most likely?
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_dt21


Variable label: Would vote differently if premonition of outcome
Literal question: Now that you know that a Conservative Party and Progress Party government was the outcome of the election, would you have changed your vote if you had known this in advance?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 196 8.1% 0.08052588
2 No 2142 88.0% 0.88003287
97 No answer 96 3.9% 0.03944125
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt22


Variable label: Would vote for following party if knowledge of outcome
Literal question: Which party would have voted for if this is the case?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democratic Party 10 5.1% 0.05102041
2 The Conservative Party 17 8.7% 0.08673469
3 The Progress Party 5 2.6% 0.02551020
4 The Liberal Party 28 14.3% 0.14285714
5 The Socialist Left Party 9 4.6% 0.04591837
6 The Centre Party 8 4.1% 0.04081633
7 The Green Party 18 9.2% 0.09183673
8 The Labour Party 96 49.0% 0.48979592
9 Other: 2 1.0% 0.01020408
97 No answer 3 1.5% 0.01530612
98 Not asked 4709 NA

w01_dt22_9_other


Variable label: Text: Would vote for following party if knowledge of outcome [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Which party would have voted for if this is the case?
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k8_1


Variable label: Placement on the political spectrum
Pre-question text: In politics one often speaks of the “left wing” and “right wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are at the far left politically, while 10 represents those who are at the far right.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-99]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 Left 88 1.8% 0.01794088
1 1 127 2.6% 0.02589195
2 2 351 7.2% 0.07155963
3 3 629 12.8% 0.12823649
4 4 503 10.3% 0.10254842
5 5 683 13.9% 0.13924567
6 6 649 13.2% 0.13231397
7 7 716 14.6% 0.14597350
8 8 485 9.9% 0.09887870
9 9 183 3.7% 0.03730887
10 10 Right 162 3.3% 0.03302752
97 No answer 138 2.8% 0.02813456
99 No response 191 3.9% 0.03893986

w01_k9_1


Variable label:
  1. Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Technical description: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important. [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k9_1_sak1_kod


Variable label:
  1. Most important political issues - recoded
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Technical description: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important. [Recode of w01_k9_1]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4292] [Invalid:613] [Range:1001-900906]


w01_k9_2


Variable label:
  1. Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Technical description: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important. [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k9_2_sak2_kod


Variable label:
  1. Most important political issues - recoded
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Technical description: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important. [Recode of w01_k9_2]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4279] [Invalid:626] [Range:1001-8008001]


w01_k9_3


Variable label:
  1. Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Technical description: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important. [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k9_3_sak3_kod


Variable label:
  1. Most important political issues - recoded
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Technical description: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important. [Recode of w01_k9_3]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4290] [Invalid:615] [Range:1001-900906]


w01_dt16_1


Variable label: Place party on political spectrum: Christian Democractic Party
Pre-question text: In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
Literal question: The Christian Democratic Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 Left 28 0.6% 0.005708461
1 1 41 0.8% 0.008358818
2 2 83 1.7% 0.016921509
3 3 171 3.5% 0.034862385
4 4 367 7.5% 0.074821611
5 5 1000 20.4% 0.203873598
6 6 1048 21.4% 0.213659531
7 7 738 15.0% 0.150458716
8 8 352 7.2% 0.071763507
9 9 119 2.4% 0.024260958
10 10 Right 63 1.3% 0.012844037
97 No answer 895 18.2% 0.182466871

w01_dt16_2


Variable label: Place party on political spectrum: Conservative Party
Pre-question text: In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
Literal question: The Conservative Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 Left 6 0.1% 0.001223242
1 1 10 0.2% 0.002038736
2 2 14 0.3% 0.002854230
3 3 15 0.3% 0.003058104
4 4 31 0.6% 0.006320082
5 5 81 1.7% 0.016513761
6 6 167 3.4% 0.034046891
7 7 630 12.8% 0.128440367
8 8 1254 25.6% 0.255657492
9 9 1157 23.6% 0.235881753
10 10 Right 730 14.9% 0.148827727
97 No answer 810 16.5% 0.165137615

w01_dt16_3


Variable label: Place party on political spectrum: Progress Party
Pre-question text: In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
Literal question: The Progress Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 Left 16 0.3% 0.003261978
1 1 18 0.4% 0.003669725
2 2 15 0.3% 0.003058104
3 3 27 0.6% 0.005504587
4 4 36 0.7% 0.007339450
5 5 89 1.8% 0.018144750
6 6 70 1.4% 0.014271152
7 7 193 3.9% 0.039347604
8 8 499 10.2% 0.101732926
9 9 1033 21.1% 0.210601427
10 10 Right 2075 42.3% 0.423037717
97 No answer 834 17.0% 0.170030581

w01_dt16_4


Variable label: Place party on political spectrum: Liberal Party
Pre-question text: In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
Literal question: The Liberal Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 Left 327 6.7% 0.066666667
1 1 217 4.4% 0.044240571
2 2 247 5.0% 0.050356779
3 3 307 6.3% 0.062589195
4 4 466 9.5% 0.095005097
5 5 839 17.1% 0.171049949
6 6 891 18.2% 0.181651376
7 7 502 10.2% 0.102344546
8 8 178 3.6% 0.036289501
9 9 40 0.8% 0.008154944
10 10 Right 21 0.4% 0.004281346
97 No answer 870 17.7% 0.177370031

w01_dt16_5


Variable label: Place party on political spectrum: Socialist Left Party
Pre-question text: In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
Literal question: The Socialist Left Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 Left 716 14.6% 0.145973496
1 1 1340 27.3% 0.273190622
2 2 1139 23.2% 0.232212029
3 3 509 10.4% 0.103771662
4 4 164 3.3% 0.033435270
5 5 89 1.8% 0.018144750
6 6 23 0.5% 0.004689093
7 7 13 0.3% 0.002650357
8 8 6 0.1% 0.001223242
9 9 12 0.2% 0.002446483
10 10 Right 8 0.2% 0.001630989
97 No answer 886 18.1% 0.180632008

w01_dt16_6


Variable label: Place party on political spectrum: Centre Party
Pre-question text: In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
Literal question: The Centre Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 Left 65 1.3% 0.013251784
1 1 113 2.3% 0.023037717
2 2 299 6.1% 0.060958206
3 3 560 11.4% 0.114169215
4 4 1058 21.6% 0.215698267
5 5 1176 24.0% 0.239755352
6 6 442 9.0% 0.090112130
7 7 159 3.2% 0.032415902
8 8 60 1.2% 0.012232416
9 9 20 0.4% 0.004077472
10 10 Right 7 0.1% 0.001427115
97 No answer 946 19.3% 0.192864424

w01_dt16_7


Variable label: Place party on political spectrum: Green Party
Pre-question text: In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
Literal question: The Green Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 Left 306 6.2% 0.062385321
1 1 427 8.7% 0.087054027
2 2 662 13.5% 0.134964322
3 3 675 13.8% 0.137614679
4 4 677 13.8% 0.138022426
5 5 694 14.1% 0.141488277
6 6 169 3.4% 0.034454638
7 7 62 1.3% 0.012640163
8 8 20 0.4% 0.004077472
9 9 10 0.2% 0.002038736
10 10 Right 12 0.2% 0.002446483
97 No answer 1191 24.3% 0.242813456

w01_dt16_8


Variable label: Place party on political spectrum: Labour Party
Pre-question text: In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
Literal question: The Labour Party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 Left 138 2.8% 0.028134557
1 1 264 5.4% 0.053822630
2 2 612 12.5% 0.124770642
3 3 996 20.3% 0.203058104
4 4 926 18.9% 0.188786952
5 5 653 13.3% 0.133129460
6 6 268 5.5% 0.054638124
7 7 101 2.1% 0.020591233
8 8 42 0.9% 0.008562691
9 9 25 0.5% 0.005096840
10 10 Right 24 0.5% 0.004892966
97 No answer 856 17.5% 0.174515800

w01_dt16_9


Variable label: Place party on political spectrum: Red
Pre-question text: In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
Literal question: Red
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 Left 2508 51.1% 0.511314985
1 1 728 14.8% 0.148419980
2 2 256 5.2% 0.052191641
3 3 100 2.0% 0.020387360
4 4 76 1.5% 0.015494393
5 5 89 1.8% 0.018144750
6 6 29 0.6% 0.005912334
7 7 21 0.4% 0.004281346
8 8 17 0.3% 0.003465851
9 9 15 0.3% 0.003058104
10 10 Right 19 0.4% 0.003873598
97 No answer 1047 21.3% 0.213455657

w01_k10


Variable label: Perception of current economic situation
Literal question: How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway? Do you believe it is:
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 1832 37.3% 0.373496432
2 Good 2178 44.4% 0.444036697
3 Somewhat good 453 9.2% 0.092354740
4 Neither good nor poor 157 3.2% 0.032008155
5 Somewhat poor 101 2.1% 0.020591233
6 Poor 34 0.7% 0.006931702
7 Very poor 10 0.2% 0.002038736
97 No answer 140 2.9% 0.028542304

w01_k11


Variable label: Satisfaction with the Norwegian democracy
Literal question: All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 858 17.5% 0.174923547
2 Satisfied 2757 56.2% 0.562079511
3 Somewhat satisfied 894 18.2% 0.182262997
4 Not very satisfied 188 3.8% 0.038328236
5 Not satisfied at all 43 0.9% 0.008766565
97 No answer 165 3.4% 0.033639144

w01_k12_1


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: Government
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: The Government
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 136 2.8% 0.02772681
2 High confidence 1410 28.7% 0.28746177
3 Some confidence 1493 30.4% 0.30438328
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 613 12.5% 0.12497452
5 Some mistrust 545 11.1% 0.11111111
6 High mistrust 223 4.5% 0.04546381
7 Very high mistrust 90 1.8% 0.01834862
8 Don't know 92 1.9% 0.01875637
97 No answer 303 6.2% 0.06177370

w01_k12_2


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: Parliament
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: Parliament
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 256 5.2% 0.052191641
2 High confidence 1752 35.7% 0.357186544
3 Some confidence 1446 29.5% 0.294801223
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 568 11.6% 0.115800204
5 Some mistrust 340 6.9% 0.069317023
6 High mistrust 102 2.1% 0.020795107
7 Very high mistrust 42 0.9% 0.008562691
8 Don't know 92 1.9% 0.018756371
97 No answer 307 6.3% 0.062589195

w01_k12_3


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: Politicians
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: Politicians
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 31 0.6% 0.006320082
2 High confidence 438 8.9% 0.089296636
3 Some confidence 1660 33.8% 0.338430173
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 827 16.9% 0.168603466
5 Some mistrust 1027 20.9% 0.209378186
6 High mistrust 353 7.2% 0.071967380
7 Very high mistrust 170 3.5% 0.034658512
8 Don't know 85 1.7% 0.017329256
97 No answer 314 6.4% 0.064016310

w01_k12_4


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: Parties
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: Parties
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 28 0.6% 0.005708461
2 High confidence 379 7.7% 0.077268094
3 Some confidence 1722 35.1% 0.351070336
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 1079 22.0% 0.219979613
5 Some mistrust 887 18.1% 0.180835882
6 High mistrust 208 4.2% 0.042405708
7 Very high mistrust 59 1.2% 0.012028542
8 Don't know 190 3.9% 0.038735984
97 No answer 353 7.2% 0.071967380

w01_k12_5


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: The Sameting
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: The Sameting
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 44 0.9% 0.008970438
2 High confidence 228 4.6% 0.046483180
3 Some confidence 357 7.3% 0.072782875
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 1488 30.3% 0.303363914
5 Some mistrust 267 5.4% 0.054434251
6 High mistrust 192 3.9% 0.039143731
7 Very high mistrust 179 3.6% 0.036493374
8 Don't know 1796 36.6% 0.366156983
97 No answer 354 7.2% 0.072171254

w01_k12_6


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: The County Council
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: The County Council
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 33 0.7% 0.006727829
2 High confidence 435 8.9% 0.088685015
3 Some confidence 1122 22.9% 0.228746177
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 1404 28.6% 0.286238532
5 Some mistrust 589 12.0% 0.120081549
6 High mistrust 234 4.8% 0.047706422
7 Very high mistrust 153 3.1% 0.031192661
8 Don't know 588 12.0% 0.119877676
97 No answer 347 7.1% 0.070744139

w01_k12_7


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: The Municipal Council
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: The municipal council
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 46 0.9% 0.009378186
2 High confidence 739 15.1% 0.150662589
3 Some confidence 1676 34.2% 0.341692151
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 854 17.4% 0.174108053
5 Some mistrust 745 15.2% 0.151885831
6 High mistrust 243 5.0% 0.049541284
7 Very high mistrust 110 2.2% 0.022426096
8 Don't know 183 3.7% 0.037308869
97 No answer 309 6.3% 0.062996942

w01_k12_8


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: EU
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: The EU
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 62 1.3% 0.01264016
2 High confidence 425 8.7% 0.08664628
3 Some confidence 1112 22.7% 0.22670744
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 1003 20.4% 0.20448522
5 Some mistrust 855 17.4% 0.17431193
6 High mistrust 555 11.3% 0.11314985
7 Very high mistrust 374 7.6% 0.07624873
8 Don't know 205 4.2% 0.04179409
97 No answer 314 6.4% 0.06401631

w01_k12_9


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: UN
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: The UN
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 324 6.6% 0.06605505
2 High confidence 1497 30.5% 0.30519878
3 Some confidence 1356 27.6% 0.27645260
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 703 14.3% 0.14332314
5 Some mistrust 320 6.5% 0.06523955
6 High mistrust 126 2.6% 0.02568807
7 Very high mistrust 74 1.5% 0.01508665
8 Don't know 185 3.8% 0.03771662
97 No answer 320 6.5% 0.06523955

w01_dt5_1


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: Courts
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: The Courts/Judiciary
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 644 13.1% 0.13129460
2 High confidence 2124 43.3% 0.43302752
3 Some confidence 962 19.6% 0.19612640
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 399 8.1% 0.08134557
5 Some mistrust 287 5.9% 0.05851172
6 High mistrust 85 1.7% 0.01732926
7 Very high mistrust 61 1.2% 0.01243629
8 Don't know 101 2.1% 0.02059123
97 No answer 242 4.9% 0.04933741

w01_dt5_2


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: Police
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: The Police
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 311 6.3% 0.063404689
2 High confidence 1884 38.4% 0.384097859
3 Some confidence 1360 27.7% 0.277268094
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 385 7.8% 0.078491335
5 Some mistrust 434 8.8% 0.088481142
6 High mistrust 174 3.5% 0.035474006
7 Very high mistrust 96 2.0% 0.019571865
8 Don't know 34 0.7% 0.006931702
97 No answer 227 4.6% 0.046279307

w01_dt5_3


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: Media
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: Media
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 32 0.7% 0.006523955
2 High confidence 327 6.7% 0.066666667
3 Some confidence 1264 25.8% 0.257696228
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 927 18.9% 0.188990826
5 Some mistrust 1313 26.8% 0.267686035
6 High mistrust 552 11.3% 0.112538226
7 Very high mistrust 211 4.3% 0.043017329
8 Don't know 44 0.9% 0.008970438
97 No answer 235 4.8% 0.047910296

w01_dt5_4


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: Scientists
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: Scientists
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 351 7.2% 0.071559633
2 High confidence 1813 37.0% 0.369622834
3 Some confidence 1398 28.5% 0.285015291
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 651 13.3% 0.132721713
5 Some mistrust 239 4.9% 0.048725790
6 High mistrust 53 1.1% 0.010805301
7 Very high mistrust 31 0.6% 0.006320082
8 Don't know 114 2.3% 0.023241590
97 No answer 255 5.2% 0.051987768

w01_dt5_5


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: NAV
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: NAV
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 59 1.2% 0.01202854
2 High confidence 495 10.1% 0.10091743
3 Some confidence 1282 26.1% 0.26136595
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 880 17.9% 0.17940877
5 Some mistrust 901 18.4% 0.18369011
6 High mistrust 504 10.3% 0.10275229
7 Very high mistrust 409 8.3% 0.08338430
8 Don't know 146 3.0% 0.02976555
97 No answer 229 4.7% 0.04668705

w01_dt5_6


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: The banking sector
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: The banking sector
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 143 2.9% 0.02915392
2 High confidence 1286 26.2% 0.26218145
3 Some confidence 1357 27.7% 0.27665647
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 787 16.0% 0.16044852
5 Some mistrust 685 14.0% 0.13965341
6 High mistrust 227 4.6% 0.04627931
7 Very high mistrust 100 2.0% 0.02038736
8 Don't know 80 1.6% 0.01630989
97 No answer 240 4.9% 0.04892966

w01_dt5_7


Variable label: Trust in institution or player: The health services
Pre-question text: Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
Literal question: The health services
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 206 4.2% 0.041997961
2 High confidence 1730 35.3% 0.352701325
3 Some confidence 1529 31.2% 0.311722732
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 358 7.3% 0.072986748
5 Some mistrust 566 11.5% 0.115392457
6 High mistrust 189 3.9% 0.038532110
7 Very high mistrust 76 1.5% 0.015494393
8 Don't know 26 0.5% 0.005300714
97 No answer 225 4.6% 0.045871560

w01_k31_1


Variable label: Statement: The state should reduce income inequality
Pre-question text: Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question: The state should contribute to reducing inequalities in income in society
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 867 17.7% 0.17675841
2 Agree 1152 23.5% 0.23486239
3 Agree somewhat 1205 24.6% 0.24566769
4 Neither agree nor disagree 459 9.4% 0.09357798
5 Disagree somewhat 497 10.1% 0.10132518
6 Disagree 375 7.6% 0.07645260
7 Strongly disagree 151 3.1% 0.03078491
97 No answer 199 4.1% 0.04057085

w01_k31_2


Variable label: Statement: Better with diversity of religions
Pre-question text: Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question: It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different religions and views on life.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 462 9.4% 0.09418960
2 Agree 957 19.5% 0.19510703
3 Agree somewhat 1001 20.4% 0.20407747
4 Neither agree nor disagree 645 13.1% 0.13149847
5 Disagree somewhat 730 14.9% 0.14882773
6 Disagree 542 11.0% 0.11049949
7 Strongly disagree 366 7.5% 0.07461774
97 No answer 202 4.1% 0.04118247

w01_k31_3


Variable label: Statement: Emission reductions should be made abroad
Pre-question text: Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question: Most of the emission reductions Norway is committed to should be made abroad.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 175 3.6% 0.03567788
2 Agree 388 7.9% 0.07910296
3 Agree somewhat 611 12.5% 0.12456677
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1389 28.3% 0.28318043
5 Disagree somewhat 788 16.1% 0.16065240
6 Disagree 868 17.7% 0.17696228
7 Strongly disagree 446 9.1% 0.09092762
97 No answer 240 4.9% 0.04892966

w01_k14_1


Variable label: Statement: Politics is complicated
Pre-question text: Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me have no understanding of what it’s about.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 275 5.6% 0.05606524
2 Agree 665 13.6% 0.13557594
3 Agree somewhat 1340 27.3% 0.27319062
4 Neither agree nor disagree 444 9.1% 0.09051988
5 Disagree somewhat 697 14.2% 0.14209990
6 Disagree 947 19.3% 0.19306830
7 Strongly disagree 339 6.9% 0.06911315
97 No answer 198 4.0% 0.04036697

w01_k14_2


Variable label: Statement: Can vote, not much else to influence
Pre-question text: Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question: People like me can vote, but there is nothing else we can do to influence politics.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 278 5.7% 0.05667686
2 Agree 640 13.0% 0.13047910
3 Agree somewhat 759 15.5% 0.15474006
4 Neither agree nor disagree 354 7.2% 0.07217125
5 Disagree somewhat 984 20.1% 0.20061162
6 Disagree 1184 24.1% 0.24138634
7 Strongly disagree 501 10.2% 0.10214067
97 No answer 205 4.2% 0.04179409

w01_k15_99


Variable label: Trust people
Pre-question text: Now to a more general question:
Literal question: Would you agree that most people in general can be trusted, or do you believe that one can’t be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description: 0 means “Can’t be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be trusted.”
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Can't be careful enough 79 1.6% 0.01610601
1 1 60 1.2% 0.01223242
2 2 122 2.5% 0.02487258
3 3 223 4.5% 0.04546381
4 4 266 5.4% 0.05423038
5 5 527 10.7% 0.10744139
6 6 516 10.5% 0.10519878
7 7 1079 22.0% 0.21997961
8 8 961 19.6% 0.19592253
9 9 435 8.9% 0.08868502
10 10 - Most people can be trusted 409 8.3% 0.08338430
97 No answer 228 4.6% 0.04648318

w01_k16_1


Variable label: Has an opinion on most issues
Pre-question text: How do the following statements apply to you as a person?
Literal question: I have an opinion on most things
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Apply very well 525 10.7% 0.107033639
2 Apply well 1776 36.2% 0.362079511
3 Apply somewhat well 1610 32.8% 0.328236493
4 Apply neither well nor poorly 457 9.3% 0.093170234
5 Apply somewhat poorly 261 5.3% 0.053211009
6 Apply poorly 85 1.7% 0.017329256
7 Apply very poorly 6 0.1% 0.001223242
97 No answer 185 3.8% 0.037716616

w01_k16_2


Variable label: Strong opinions, also regarding new issues
Pre-question text: How do the following statements apply to you as a person?
Literal question: I have strong opinions, either positive or negative, including on issues that are new to me
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Apply very well 191 3.9% 0.03893986
2 Apply well 749 15.3% 0.15270133
3 Apply somewhat well 1335 27.2% 0.27217125
4 Apply neither well nor poorly 1055 21.5% 0.21508665
5 Apply somewhat poorly 787 16.0% 0.16044852
6 Apply poorly 453 9.2% 0.09235474
7 Apply very poorly 104 2.1% 0.02120285
97 No answer 231 4.7% 0.04709480

w01_ran1


Variable label: Randomizes independently from U
Pre-question text: Randomizes into three groups and selects one of the following questions: KM1, KM2, KM3
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4780] [Invalid:125] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1607 33.6% 0.3361925
2 1601 33.5% 0.3349372
3 1572 32.9% 0.3288703
Sysmiss 125 NA

w01_km1


Variable label: Heard the argument: Climate change a threat, but we should continue to extract oil as usual
Pre-question text: Have you heard or read the following statement?
Literal question: Climate change is a very serious threat, and a lot more must be done to prevent it. Norway should nevertheless continue to produce as much oil as we currently do, because the world needs energy.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes, I have heard or read this. 609 76.5% 0.76507538
2 No, I have not heard or read this 175 22.0% 0.21984925
97 No answer 12 1.5% 0.01507538
98 Not asked 4109 NA

w01_km2


Variable label: Heard the argument: Climate change a threat and we should reduce oil extraction
Pre-question text: Have you heard or read the following statement?
Literal question: Climate change is a very serious threat, and a lot more must be done to prevent it. This means that Norway should produce less oil than we currently do, because a large share of the world’s fossil fuel must remain unused.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes, I have heard or read this. 653 82.2% 0.82241814
2 No, I have not heard or read this 127 16.0% 0.15994962
97 No answer 14 1.8% 0.01763224
98 Not asked 4111 NA

w01_km3


Variable label: Heard the argument: Climate change is not a threat and we should continue to extract oil as usual
Pre-question text: Have you heard or read the following statement?
Literal question: Climate change is a not a serious threat, and too much is being done to prevent it. This means that Norway should continue to produce as much oil as we currently do, because the world needs energy.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes, I have heard or read this. 490 62.3% 0.62340967
2 No, I have not heard or read this 280 35.6% 0.35623410
97 No answer 16 2.0% 0.02035623
98 Not asked 4119 NA

w01_km36


Variable label: Concerned about climate change
Literal question: How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very concerned 753 15.4% 0.15351682
2 Concerned 1558 31.8% 0.31763507
3 Somewhat concerned 1576 32.1% 0.32130479
4 Not particularly concerned 680 13.9% 0.13863405
5 Not concerned 167 3.4% 0.03404689
97 No answer 171 3.5% 0.03486239

w01_km37


Variable label: Agreement with statement
Literal question: Which of the below statements do you most agree with?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norway should continue to produce as much oil as we currently do. 2293 46.7% 0.46748216
2 Norway should produce less oil than we currently do 2056 41.9% 0.41916412
3 Norway should produce more oil than we currently do 316 6.4% 0.06442406
97 No answer 240 4.9% 0.04892966

w01_km4


Variable label: Statement fits view on climate change
Literal question: Based on what you know, which of the following statements best describes your view on climate change?
Technical description: Choose one option.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I believe that the climate is not changing. 35 0.7% 0.007135576
2 I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. 311 6.3% 0.063404689
3 I believe that the climate is changing, but that it has little to do with human action. 1056 21.5% 0.215290520
4 I believe that the climate is changing, and that it to a large extent is due to human action. 3299 67.3% 0.672579001
97 No answer 204 4.2% 0.041590214

w01_km35


Variable label: How many share your view on climate change
Literal question: The last question you answered was about your view on climate change. Which proportion of the Norwegian population do you believe shares your views on the issue?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 All, or nearly all 100 4.0% 0.040469446
2 Many (more than half) 1117 45.2% 0.452043707
3 Around half 781 31.6% 0.316066370
4 Some (fewer than half) 356 14.4% 0.144071226
5 None, or nearly none 6 0.2% 0.002428167
97 No answer 111 4.5% 0.044921085
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_ran2


Variable label: Randomizes independently from U
Pre-question text: Randomizes into two groups and selects one of the following questions: KM5 or KM6
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4775] [Invalid:130] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 r1 2371 49.7% 0.4965445
2 r2 2404 50.3% 0.5034555
Sysmiss 130 NA

w01_km5


Variable label: How serious is climate change
Literal question: How serious a threat is climate change overall?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very serious 622 26.2% 0.26233657
2 Serious 991 41.8% 0.41796710
3 Somewhat serious 556 23.5% 0.23450021
4 Not very serious 142 6.0% 0.05989034
5 Not a threat 24 1.0% 0.01012231
97 No answer 36 1.5% 0.01518347
98 Not asked 2534 NA

w01_km6


Variable label: Climate change is serious to me personally
Literal question: How serious a threat is climate change to you personally?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very serious 138 5.7% 0.05740433
2 Serious 517 21.5% 0.21505824
3 Somewhat serious 833 34.7% 0.34650582
4 Not very serious 664 27.6% 0.27620632
5 Not a threat 227 9.4% 0.09442596
97 No answer 25 1.0% 0.01039933
98 Not asked 2501 NA

w01_km7


Variable label: Possible to do something about climate change
Literal question: Let’s assume that climate change may become a major threat to the world in the future if no action is taken. To which extent do you believe that it is possible to do anything to prevent harmful climate changes?
Technical description: Select the statement that is closest to your view:
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 It is impossible to do anything to prevent harmful climate change. 253 5.2% 0.05158002
2 It is possible, but very difficult to do something to prevent harmful climate change. 2661 54.3% 0.54250765
3 It is possible and completely realistic to do something to prevent harmful climate change. 1434 29.2% 0.29235474
4 It is easy to prevent harmful climate change. 64 1.3% 0.01304791
97 No answer 493 10.1% 0.10050968

w01_ran3sel_1


Variable label: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_1
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_1
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1189] [Invalid:3716] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1189 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 3716 NA

w01_ran3sel_2


Variable label: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_2
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_2
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1211] [Invalid:3694] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1211 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 3694 NA

w01_ran3sel_3


Variable label: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_3
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_3
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1204] [Invalid:3701] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1204 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 3701 NA

w01_ran3sel_4


Variable label: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_4
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_4
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1196] [Invalid:3709] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1196 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 3709 NA

w01_ran3sel_5


Variable label: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_5
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_5
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1197] [Invalid:3708] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1197 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 3708 NA

w01_ran3sel_6


Variable label: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_6
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_6
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1203] [Invalid:3702] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1203 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 3702 NA

w01_ran3sel_7


Variable label: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_7
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_7
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1225] [Invalid:3680] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1225 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 3680 NA

w01_ran3sel_8


Variable label: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_8
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_8
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1175] [Invalid:3730] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1175 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 3730 NA

w01_ran3sel_9


Variable label: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_9
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_9
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2400] [Invalid:2505] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 2400 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 2505 NA

w01_km13_1


Variable label: Measure: Tighten rules on CO2 emissions by qutoa reductions
Pre-question text: We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
Literal question: Tighten the rules for how much CO2 industry in Norway and Europe may discharge by cutting the total number of quotas these may use.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 163 13.7% 0.13708999
2 Positive 402 33.8% 0.33809924
3 Somewhat positive 300 25.2% 0.25231287
4 Neither positive nor negative 162 13.6% 0.13624895
5 Somewhat negative 47 4.0% 0.03952902
6 Negative 38 3.2% 0.03195963
7 Very negative 23 1.9% 0.01934399
97 No answer 54 4.5% 0.04541632
98 Not asked 3716 NA

w01_km13_2


Variable label: Measure: Tighten rules on CO2 emissions by limiting amount
Pre-question text: We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
Literal question: Tighten the rules for how much CO2 industry in Norway and Europe may discharge overall.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 199 16.4% 0.164327002
2 Positive 484 40.0% 0.399669694
3 Somewhat positive 292 24.1% 0.241123039
4 Neither positive nor negative 121 10.0% 0.099917424
5 Somewhat negative 39 3.2% 0.032204789
6 Negative 16 1.3% 0.013212221
7 Very negative 10 0.8% 0.008257638
97 No answer 50 4.1% 0.041288192
98 Not asked 3694 NA

w01_km13_3


Variable label: Measure: Capture and store CO2
Pre-question text: We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
Literal question: Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 76 6.3% 0.06312292
2 Positive 244 20.3% 0.20265781
3 Somewhat positive 272 22.6% 0.22591362
4 Neither positive nor negative 343 28.5% 0.28488372
5 Somewhat negative 87 7.2% 0.07225914
6 Negative 82 6.8% 0.06810631
7 Very negative 36 3.0% 0.02990033
97 No answer 64 5.3% 0.05315615
98 Not asked 3701 NA

w01_km13_4


Variable label: Measure: Capture and store CO2, like on Mognstad
Pre-question text: We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
Literal question: Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground, such as the so-called “mission to the moon” project at Mongstad
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 74 6.2% 0.06187291
2 Positive 230 19.2% 0.19230769
3 Somewhat positive 272 22.7% 0.22742475
4 Neither positive nor negative 336 28.1% 0.28093645
5 Somewhat negative 98 8.2% 0.08193980
6 Negative 69 5.8% 0.05769231
7 Very negative 39 3.3% 0.03260870
97 No answer 78 6.5% 0.06521739
98 Not asked 3709 NA

w01_km13_5


Variable label: Measure: Reduce tax incentives regarding oilfield exploration
Pre-question text: We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
Literal question: Reduce tax incentives for oil exploration on the Norwegian continental shelf.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 71 5.9% 0.05931495
2 Positive 166 13.9% 0.13868003
3 Somewhat positive 227 19.0% 0.18964077
4 Neither positive nor negative 398 33.2% 0.33249791
5 Somewhat negative 148 12.4% 0.12364244
6 Negative 82 6.9% 0.06850459
7 Very negative 36 3.0% 0.03007519
97 No answer 69 5.8% 0.05764411
98 Not asked 3708 NA

w01_km13_6


Variable label: Measure: Tighten tax regulation regarding oilfield exploration
Pre-question text: We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
Literal question: Tighten the tax regulations for oil exploration on the Norwegian continental shelf.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 79 6.6% 0.06566916
2 Positive 149 12.4% 0.12385702
3 Somewhat positive 210 17.5% 0.17456359
4 Neither positive nor negative 358 29.8% 0.29758936
5 Somewhat negative 154 12.8% 0.12801330
6 Negative 112 9.3% 0.09310058
7 Very negative 59 4.9% 0.04904406
97 No answer 82 6.8% 0.06816293
98 Not asked 3702 NA

w01_km13_7


Variable label: Measure: Prevent harmful effects of storms and precipitation
Pre-question text: We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
Literal question: Strengthen efforts to prevent the harmful effects of storms and precipitation.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 151 12.3% 0.12326531
2 Positive 401 32.7% 0.32734694
3 Somewhat positive 277 22.6% 0.22612245
4 Neither positive nor negative 239 19.5% 0.19510204
5 Somewhat negative 49 4.0% 0.04000000
6 Negative 24 2.0% 0.01959184
7 Very negative 16 1.3% 0.01306122
97 No answer 68 5.6% 0.05551020
98 Not asked 3680 NA

w01_km13_8


Variable label: Measure: Prevent harmful effects of storms and precipitation, even at the cost of other issues
Pre-question text: We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
Literal question: Strengthen efforts to prevent the harmful effects of storms and precipitation, even if this is at the cost of other important causes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 41 3.5% 0.03489362
2 Positive 203 17.3% 0.17276596
3 Somewhat positive 327 27.8% 0.27829787
4 Neither positive nor negative 322 27.4% 0.27404255
5 Somewhat negative 122 10.4% 0.10382979
6 Negative 67 5.7% 0.05702128
7 Very negative 19 1.6% 0.01617021
97 No answer 74 6.3% 0.06297872
98 Not asked 3730 NA

w01_km13_9


Variable label: Measure: Change the climate by blocking the sunlight
Pre-question text: We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
Literal question: Attempt to alter the weather and climate by e.g. launching sulphur particles that block sunlight
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 14 0.6% 0.005833333
2 Positive 37 1.5% 0.015416667
3 Somewhat positive 76 3.2% 0.031666667
4 Neither positive nor negative 632 26.3% 0.263333333
5 Somewhat negative 304 12.7% 0.126666667
6 Negative 569 23.7% 0.237083333
7 Very negative 620 25.8% 0.258333333
97 No answer 148 6.2% 0.061666667
98 Not asked 2505 NA

w01_km17


Variable label: If nothing is done about climate change weather will be more extreme
Literal question: If nothing is done to prevent it, do you believe global warming will lead to more harmful extreme weather over the next 100 years, or do you believe global warming will not lead to this?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Global warming will lead to more harmful extreme weather 2021 81.8% 0.81788749
2 Global warming will not lead to more harmful extreme weather 285 11.5% 0.11533792
97 No answer 165 6.7% 0.06677459
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_km20


Variable label: Moral obligation to prevent climate change
Literal question: To which degree do you view it as a moral duty for individuals to contribute to prevent climate change?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great degree 520 21.0% 0.21044112
2 To a great degree 893 36.1% 0.36139215
3 To some degree 728 29.5% 0.29461756
4 To a small degree 163 6.6% 0.06596520
5 Not at all 47 1.9% 0.01902064
97 No answer 120 4.9% 0.04856333
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_km22


Variable label: Knowledge about climate change
Literal question: In your opinion, how good is your knowledge on climate change?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good knowledge 55 2.2% 0.022258195
2 Good knowledge 530 21.4% 0.214488062
3 Some knowledge 1362 55.1% 0.551193849
4 Little knowledge 391 15.8% 0.158235532
5 No knowledge 24 1.0% 0.009712667
97 No answer 109 4.4% 0.044111696
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_km22k


Variable label: Comment: Knowledge about climate change [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: If you have any comments to the question, you may enter them here:
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_km23


Variable label: Discussion on climate change is characterized by conflict and disagreement
Literal question: To which degree do you think discussion concerning climate change is characterized by conflict and disagreement?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great degree 326 13.2% 0.131930393
2 To a great degree 1096 44.4% 0.443545123
3 To some degree 839 34.0% 0.339538648
4 To a small degree 80 3.2% 0.032375556
5 Not at all 6 0.2% 0.002428167
97 No answer 124 5.0% 0.050182113
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_km26


Variable label: Diversity of opinion on climate change in the media
Literal question: In your opinion, how great is the diversity in opinion on climate change that emerges in the media?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very great diversity 43 1.7% 0.01740186
2 Great diversity 578 23.4% 0.23391340
3 Some diversity 1134 45.9% 0.45892351
4 Little diversity 504 20.4% 0.20396601
5 No diversity at all 34 1.4% 0.01375961
97 No answer 178 7.2% 0.07203561
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_ran4


Variable label: Randomiserer dersom U=1
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=1 into two groups and selects one of the following questions: KM27 or KM28
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2389] [Invalid:2516] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1183 49.5% 0.4951863
2 1206 50.5% 0.5048137
Sysmiss 2516 NA

w01_km27


Variable label: Scientists agree on climate change
Literal question: To which degree do you have the impression that scientists agree on climate change?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great degree 95 8.0% 0.08030431
2 To a great degree 393 33.2% 0.33220626
3 To some degree 477 40.3% 0.40321217
4 To a small degree 156 13.2% 0.13186813
5 Not at all 34 2.9% 0.02874049
97 No answer 28 2.4% 0.02366864
98 Not asked 3722 NA

w01_km28_2_1


Variable label: Proportion of scientist that agree on climate change
Literal question: In your opinion, which proportion of climate scientists agree that global warming is a direct consequence of humans using coal, oil and gas?
Technical description: Please pick a number between 0% and 100% below.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-999]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 % 1 0.0% 0.0002038736
10 10 11 0.2% 0.0022426096
20 20 13 0.3% 0.0026503568
30 30 37 0.8% 0.0075433231
40 40 41 0.8% 0.0083588175
50 50 100 2.0% 0.0203873598
60 60 135 2.8% 0.0275229358
70 70 209 4.3% 0.0426095821
80 80 214 4.4% 0.0436289501
90 90 228 4.6% 0.0464831804
100 100 % 49 1.0% 0.0099898063
998 Not asked 3699 75.4% 0.7541284404
999 No response 168 3.4% 0.0342507645

w01_km28k


Variable label: Comment: Proportion of scientist that agree on climate change [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: If you have comments to the question, you may enter them here:
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_ran5


Variable label: Randomizes if U=1
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=1 into two groups and selects one of the following questions: KM29 or KM30
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2387] [Invalid:2518] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1159 48.6% 0.4855467
2 1228 51.4% 0.5144533
Sysmiss 2518 NA

w01_km29


Variable label: Norway commited through international agreements to cut emissions
Literal question: As you may know, government leaders from all over the world met in November to negotiate a new international agreement to limit the emissions of greenhouse gases. To which extent do you agree that Norway commits itself in such international agreements?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 409 35.3% 0.35289042
2 Agree 433 37.4% 0.37359793
3 Agree somewhat 157 13.5% 0.13546160
4 Neither agree nor disagree 77 6.6% 0.06643658
5 Disagree somewhat 31 2.7% 0.02674720
6 Disagree 17 1.5% 0.01466782
7 Strongly disagree 16 1.4% 0.01380500
97 No answer 19 1.6% 0.01639344
98 Not asked 3746 NA

w01_km30


Variable label: Norway commited through international agreements to cut emissions, even if China does not
Literal question: As you may know, government leaders from all over the world met in November to negotiate a new international agreement to limit the emissions of greenhouse gases. To which extent do you agree that Norway commits itself in such international agreements, even if it means that Norway does this before other countries such as e.g. China?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 262 21.3% 0.21335505
2 Agree 426 34.7% 0.34690554
3 Agree somewhat 248 20.2% 0.20195440
4 Neither agree nor disagree 98 8.0% 0.07980456
5 Disagree somewhat 81 6.6% 0.06596091
6 Disagree 54 4.4% 0.04397394
7 Strongly disagree 37 3.0% 0.03013029
97 No answer 22 1.8% 0.01791531
98 Not asked 3677 NA

w01_dt1_1


Variable label: Authorities have a right to: indefinite detainment
Pre-question text: Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
Literal question: Keep individuals in custody as long as they want without a judicial process
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 123 5.0% 0.04977742
2 Agree 164 6.6% 0.06636989
3 Agree somewhat 291 11.8% 0.11776609
4 Neither agree nor disagree 167 6.8% 0.06758397
5 Disagree somewhat 293 11.9% 0.11857548
6 Disagree 517 20.9% 0.20922703
7 Strongly disagree 724 29.3% 0.29299879
8 Dont wan't to respond 40 1.6% 0.01618778
97 No answer 152 6.2% 0.06151356
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_dt1_2


Variable label: Authorities have a right to: tapping phone calls
Pre-question text: Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
Literal question: Tap people’s phone calls
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 289 11.7% 0.11695670
2 Agree 524 21.2% 0.21205989
3 Agree somewhat 580 23.5% 0.23472278
4 Neither agree nor disagree 194 7.9% 0.07851072
5 Disagree somewhat 236 9.6% 0.09550789
6 Disagree 250 10.1% 0.10117361
7 Strongly disagree 220 8.9% 0.08903278
8 Dont wan't to respond 28 1.1% 0.01133144
97 No answer 150 6.1% 0.06070417
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_dt1_3


Variable label: Authorities have a right to: randomly stop and search people on the street
Pre-question text: Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
Literal question: Randomly stop and search people on the street
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 192 7.8% 0.07770134
2 Agree 353 14.3% 0.14285714
3 Agree somewhat 464 18.8% 0.18777823
4 Neither agree nor disagree 176 7.1% 0.07122622
5 Disagree somewhat 321 13.0% 0.12990692
6 Disagree 369 14.9% 0.14933225
7 Strongly disagree 421 17.0% 0.17037637
8 Dont wan't to respond 25 1.0% 0.01011736
97 No answer 150 6.1% 0.06070417
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_dt1_4


Variable label: Authorities have a right to: arrest people without suspision
Pre-question text: Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
Literal question: Arrest people without specific suspicion
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 124 5.0% 0.05018211
2 Agree 202 8.2% 0.08174828
3 Agree somewhat 326 13.2% 0.13193039
4 Neither agree nor disagree 235 9.5% 0.09510320
5 Disagree somewhat 334 13.5% 0.13516795
6 Disagree 544 22.0% 0.22015378
7 Strongly disagree 515 20.8% 0.20841764
8 Dont wan't to respond 38 1.5% 0.01537839
97 No answer 153 6.2% 0.06191825
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_dt1_5


Variable label: Authorities have a right to: monitor electronic communication
Pre-question text: Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
Literal question: Monitor electronic communication (beyond telephones)
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 386 15.6% 0.15621206
2 Agree 664 26.9% 0.26871712
3 Agree somewhat 576 23.3% 0.23310401
4 Neither agree nor disagree 157 6.4% 0.06353703
5 Disagree somewhat 185 7.5% 0.07486847
6 Disagree 180 7.3% 0.07284500
7 Strongly disagree 149 6.0% 0.06029947
8 Dont wan't to respond 26 1.1% 0.01052206
97 No answer 148 6.0% 0.05989478
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_dt1_6


Variable label: Authorities have a right to: monitor/bug room
Pre-question text: Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
Literal question: Monitor/bug rooms
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 373 15.1% 0.15095103
2 Agree 564 22.8% 0.22824767
3 Agree somewhat 618 25.0% 0.25010117
4 Neither agree nor disagree 188 7.6% 0.07608256
5 Disagree somewhat 209 8.5% 0.08458114
6 Disagree 170 6.9% 0.06879806
7 Strongly disagree 168 6.8% 0.06798867
8 Dont wan't to respond 29 1.2% 0.01173614
97 No answer 152 6.2% 0.06151356
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_dt1_7


Variable label: Authorities have a right to: cordon off large part of the city
Pre-question text: Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
Literal question: Cordon off large parts of the city
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 411 16.6% 0.16632942
2 Agree 728 29.5% 0.29461756
3 Agree somewhat 552 22.3% 0.22339134
4 Neither agree nor disagree 229 9.3% 0.09267503
5 Disagree somewhat 132 5.3% 0.05341967
6 Disagree 149 6.0% 0.06029947
7 Strongly disagree 87 3.5% 0.03520842
8 Dont wan't to respond 29 1.2% 0.01173614
97 No answer 154 6.2% 0.06232295
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_dt1_8


Variable label: Authorities have a right to: patrol the streets with armed military or police
Pre-question text: Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
Literal question: Allow armed police or military personnel to patrol the streets
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 490 19.8% 0.198300283
2 Agree 729 29.5% 0.295022258
3 Agree somewhat 514 20.8% 0.208012950
4 Neither agree nor disagree 139 5.6% 0.056252529
5 Disagree somewhat 174 7.0% 0.070416835
6 Disagree 143 5.8% 0.057871307
7 Strongly disagree 121 4.9% 0.048968029
8 Dont wan't to respond 17 0.7% 0.006879806
97 No answer 144 5.8% 0.058276002
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_dt1k


Variable label: Comment: Authorities have a right to [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: If you have any comments to the question, enter them here:
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_dt2


Variable label: Willing to accept that maintaining the safety of society must be at the cost of civil liberties
Literal question: How willing are you to accept that maintaining the safety of society must be at the cost of the freedom of individuals (such as privacy)?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very willing 180 7.3% 0.07284500
2 Willing 601 24.3% 0.24322137
3 Somewhat willing 899 36.4% 0.36382032
4 Not very willing 500 20.2% 0.20234723
5 Not willing at all 157 6.4% 0.06353703
97 No answer 134 5.4% 0.05422906
98 Not asked 2434 NA

w01_ran7


Variable label: Randomizes independently from U
Pre-question text: Randomizes into two groups and selects one of the following questions: DT3 and DT4
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4750] [Invalid:155] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 2351 49.5% 0.4949474
2 2399 50.5% 0.5050526
Sysmiss 155 NA

w01_dt3_1


Variable label: Trust in central government to handle: natural disasters
Pre-question text: To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that central Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
Literal question: Natural disasters such as landslides, floods and hurricanes
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 78 3.3% 0.03317737
2 High confidence 668 28.4% 0.28413441
3 Some confidence 864 36.8% 0.36750319
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 245 10.4% 0.10421097
5 Some mistrust 271 11.5% 0.11527010
6 High mistrust 103 4.4% 0.04381114
7 Very high mistrust 30 1.3% 0.01276053
8 Don't know 27 1.1% 0.01148447
97 No answer 65 2.8% 0.02764781
98 Not asked 2554 NA

w01_dt3_2


Variable label: Trust in central government to handle: transportation accident
Pre-question text: To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that central Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
Literal question: Accidents in connection with aviation, railroads, roads and shipping
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 85 3.6% 0.03615483
2 High confidence 824 35.0% 0.35048915
3 Some confidence 826 35.1% 0.35133986
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 187 8.0% 0.07954062
5 Some mistrust 223 9.5% 0.09485325
6 High mistrust 84 3.6% 0.03572948
7 Very high mistrust 26 1.1% 0.01105912
8 Don't know 31 1.3% 0.01318588
97 No answer 65 2.8% 0.02764781
98 Not asked 2554 NA

w01_dt3_3


Variable label: Trust in central government to handle: contagious disease
Pre-question text: To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that central Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
Literal question: Contagion in connection with food, drinking water or epidemics (for example bird flu, swine flu, E.coli)
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 74 3.1% 0.03147597
2 High confidence 611 26.0% 0.25988941
3 Some confidence 799 34.0% 0.33985538
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 266 11.3% 0.11314334
5 Some mistrust 341 14.5% 0.14504466
6 High mistrust 119 5.1% 0.05061676
7 Very high mistrust 40 1.7% 0.01701404
8 Don't know 34 1.4% 0.01446193
97 No answer 67 2.8% 0.02849851
98 Not asked 2554 NA

w01_dt3_4


Variable label: Trust in central government to handle: failure in critical infratructure
Pre-question text: To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that central Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
Literal question: Failure in critical infrastructure (such as power supply, electronic communication, telecommunication, oil and fuel supply)
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 46 2.0% 0.01956614
2 High confidence 505 21.5% 0.21480221
3 Some confidence 796 33.9% 0.33857933
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 285 12.1% 0.12122501
5 Some mistrust 402 17.1% 0.17099107
6 High mistrust 139 5.9% 0.05912378
7 Very high mistrust 60 2.6% 0.02552105
8 Don't know 52 2.2% 0.02211825
97 No answer 66 2.8% 0.02807316
98 Not asked 2554 NA

w01_dt3_5


Variable label: Trust in central government to handle: terrorist attack
Pre-question text: To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that central Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
Literal question: Terrorist attacks
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 30 1.3% 0.01276053
2 High confidence 284 12.1% 0.12079966
3 Some confidence 766 32.6% 0.32581880
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 242 10.3% 0.10293492
5 Some mistrust 481 20.5% 0.20459379
6 High mistrust 294 12.5% 0.12505317
7 Very high mistrust 155 6.6% 0.06592939
8 Don't know 34 1.4% 0.01446193
97 No answer 65 2.8% 0.02764781
98 Not asked 2554 NA

w01_dt4_1


Variable label: Trust in local government to handle: natural disaster
Pre-question text: To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that local Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
Literal question: Natural disasters such as landslides, floods and hurricanes
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 48 2.0% 0.02000834
2 High confidence 583 24.3% 0.24301792
3 Some confidence 918 38.3% 0.38265944
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 286 11.9% 0.11921634
5 Some mistrust 311 13.0% 0.12963735
6 High mistrust 117 4.9% 0.04877032
7 Very high mistrust 46 1.9% 0.01917466
8 Don't know 30 1.3% 0.01250521
97 No answer 60 2.5% 0.02501042
98 Not asked 2506 NA

w01_dt4_2


Variable label: Trust in local government to handle: transportation accident
Pre-question text: To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that local Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
Literal question: Accidents in connection with aviation, railroads, roads and shipping
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 63 2.6% 0.02626094
2 High confidence 698 29.1% 0.29095456
3 Some confidence 856 35.7% 0.35681534
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 261 10.9% 0.10879533
5 Some mistrust 308 12.8% 0.12838683
6 High mistrust 94 3.9% 0.03918299
7 Very high mistrust 33 1.4% 0.01375573
8 Don't know 25 1.0% 0.01042101
97 No answer 61 2.5% 0.02542726
98 Not asked 2506 NA

w01_dt4_3


Variable label: Trust in local government to handle: contagious disease
Pre-question text: To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that local Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
Literal question: Contagion in connection with food, drinking water or epidemics (for example bird flu, swine flu, E.coli)
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 56 2.3% 0.02334306
2 High confidence 532 22.2% 0.22175907
3 Some confidence 853 35.6% 0.35556482
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 258 10.8% 0.10754481
5 Some mistrust 381 15.9% 0.15881617
6 High mistrust 160 6.7% 0.06669446
7 Very high mistrust 62 2.6% 0.02584410
8 Don't know 38 1.6% 0.01583993
97 No answer 59 2.5% 0.02459358
98 Not asked 2506 NA

w01_dt4_4


Variable label: Trust in local government to handle: failure in critical infrastructure
Pre-question text: To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that local Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
Literal question: Failure in critical infrastructure (such as power supply, electronic communication, telecommunication, oil and fuel supply)
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 40 1.7% 0.01667361
2 High confidence 462 19.3% 0.19258024
3 Some confidence 826 34.4% 0.34431013
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 319 13.3% 0.13297207
5 Some mistrust 407 17.0% 0.16965402
6 High mistrust 164 6.8% 0.06836182
7 Very high mistrust 63 2.6% 0.02626094
8 Don't know 54 2.3% 0.02250938
97 No answer 64 2.7% 0.02667778
98 Not asked 2506 NA

w01_dt4_5


Variable label: Trust in local government to handle: terrorist attack
Pre-question text: To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that local Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
Literal question: Terrorist attacks
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 23 1.0% 0.009587328
2 High confidence 199 8.3% 0.082951230
3 Some confidence 594 24.8% 0.247603168
4 Neither confidence nor mistrust 314 13.1% 0.130887870
5 Some mistrust 531 22.1% 0.221342226
6 High mistrust 408 17.0% 0.170070863
7 Very high mistrust 224 9.3% 0.093372238
8 Don't know 48 2.0% 0.020008337
97 No answer 58 2.4% 0.024176740
98 Not asked 2506 NA

w01_dt6_1


Variable label: People are considerate and helpful
Literal question: Would you say that people usually try to be considerate to others and helpful, or that they mainly look out for themselves? Indicate your opinion using the scale below.
Technical description: 0 means “Mainly look out for themselves” and 10 means “Are considerate to others and helpful”.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-99]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Mainly look out for themselves 24 1.0% 0.009860312
1 1 36 1.5% 0.014790468
2 2 85 3.5% 0.034921939
3 3 193 7.9% 0.079293344
4 4 229 9.4% 0.094083813
5 5 400 16.4% 0.164338537
6 6 403 16.6% 0.165571076
7 7 535 22.0% 0.219802794
8 8 269 11.1% 0.110517666
9 9 101 4.1% 0.041495481
10 10 - Are considerate to others and helpful 43 1.8% 0.017666393
97 No answer 0 0.0% 0.000000000
98 Not asked 2471 NA
99 No response 116 4.8% 0.047658176

w01_dt7_1


Variable label: People are exploitative
Literal question: Do you believe that most people would try to take advantage of you if they had the chance, or do you think they would try to be kind? Indicate your opinion below.
Technical description: 0 means “Would try to take advantage” and 10 means “Would try to be kind”.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-99]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Would try to take advantage 23 0.9% 0.009449466
1 1 32 1.3% 0.013147083
2 2 84 3.5% 0.034511093
3 3 133 5.5% 0.054642564
4 4 184 7.6% 0.075595727
5 5 368 15.1% 0.151191454
6 6 368 15.1% 0.151191454
7 7 517 21.2% 0.212407560
8 8 374 15.4% 0.153656532
9 9 136 5.6% 0.055875103
10 10 - Would try to be kind 71 2.9% 0.029170090
97 No answer 0 0.0% 0.000000000
98 Not asked 2471 NA
99 No response 144 5.9% 0.059161873

w01_dv30_1


Variable label: Statement: lower taxes even if it means cuts to welfare
Pre-question text: To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question: Tax rates should be lowered, even if it leads to cutbacks in the welfare state.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 98 4.0% 0.04026294
2 Agree 182 7.5% 0.07477403
3 Agree somewhat 374 15.4% 0.15365653
4 Neither agree nor disagree 287 11.8% 0.11791290
5 Disagree somewhat 439 18.0% 0.18036154
6 Disagree 530 21.8% 0.21774856
7 Strongly disagree 400 16.4% 0.16433854
97 No answer 124 5.1% 0.05094495
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dv30_2


Variable label: Statement: allow commercialized private schools
Pre-question text: To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question: Commercial private schools should be permitted.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 174 7.1% 0.07148726
2 Agree 412 16.9% 0.16926869
3 Agree somewhat 483 19.8% 0.19843878
4 Neither agree nor disagree 330 13.6% 0.13557929
5 Disagree somewhat 313 12.9% 0.12859491
6 Disagree 302 12.4% 0.12407560
7 Strongly disagree 296 12.2% 0.12161052
97 No answer 124 5.1% 0.05094495
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dv30_3


Variable label: Statement: public services cheaper and better if left to private actors
Pre-question text: To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question: Many public services could be carried out both better and cheaper if they were left to private parties.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 208 8.5% 0.08545604
2 Agree 408 16.8% 0.16762531
3 Agree somewhat 584 24.0% 0.23993426
4 Neither agree nor disagree 258 10.6% 0.10599836
5 Disagree somewhat 316 13.0% 0.12982744
6 Disagree 337 13.8% 0.13845522
7 Strongly disagree 201 8.3% 0.08258012
97 No answer 122 5.0% 0.05012325
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt8_1


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: contacted local politician
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Contacted a local politician
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4156 84.7% 0.84729867
1 Selected 570 11.6% 0.11620795
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_2


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: contacted national politician
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Contacted a national politician
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4520 92.2% 0.92150866
1 Selected 206 4.2% 0.04199796
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_3


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: contacted voluntary organization
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Contacted a voluntary organization or association
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4136 84.3% 0.84322120
1 Selected 590 12.0% 0.12028542
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_4


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: contacted a public official at the national level
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Contacted a public official at the national level
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4579 93.4% 0.93353721
1 Selected 147 3.0% 0.02996942
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_5


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: contacted a public official at the local level
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Contacted a public official at the local level
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4250 86.6% 0.86646279
1 Selected 476 9.7% 0.09704383
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_6


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: participated in work in a political party
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Participated in work in a political party
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4505 91.8% 0.91845056
1 Selected 221 4.5% 0.04505607
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_7


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: participated in work for protest group
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Participated in work in a political action group, local protest group or similar
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4544 92.6% 0.92640163
1 Selected 182 3.7% 0.03710499
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_8


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: participated in work for voluntary organization
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Participated in work in a voluntary organization or association
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 3721 75.9% 0.75861366
1 Selected 1005 20.5% 0.20489297
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_9


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: worn or posted champaign sticker or emblem
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Worn or posted a campaign sticker or emblem
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4467 91.1% 0.91070336
1 Selected 259 5.3% 0.05280326
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_10


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: signed a petition
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Signed an appeal, a petition, action list or similar
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 3379 68.9% 0.68888889
1 Selected 1347 27.5% 0.27461774
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_11


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: participated in public protest
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Participated in a public demonstration
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4502 91.8% 0.91783894
1 Selected 224 4.6% 0.04566769
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_12


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: boycotted certain products
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Boycotted specific products
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 3479 70.9% 0.70927625
1 Selected 1247 25.4% 0.25423038
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_13


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: consciously puchased specific products for political reasons
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Consciously purchased specific products for political, moral or environmental reasons
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 3132 63.9% 0.63853211
1 Selected 1594 32.5% 0.32497452
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_14


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: provided financial support
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Provided financial support
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2908 59.3% 0.59286442
1 Selected 1818 37.1% 0.37064220
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_15


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: collected money
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Collected money
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4344 88.6% 0.88562691
1 Selected 382 7.8% 0.07787971
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_16


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: contacted or appeared in media
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Contacted or appeared in the media
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4432 90.4% 0.90356779
1 Selected 294 6.0% 0.05993884
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_17


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: contacted lawyer
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Contacted a lawyer or legal advisor
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4534 92.4% 0.92436290
1 Selected 192 3.9% 0.03914373
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_18


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: participated in public meeting
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Participated in a public meeting
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4029 82.1% 0.82140673
1 Selected 697 14.2% 0.14209990
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt8_19


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: participated in political meeting
Pre-question text: In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
Literal question: Participated at a political meeting or event
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 4311 87.9% 0.87889908
1 Selected 415 8.5% 0.08460754
97 No answer 179 3.6% 0.03649337

w01_dt9_1


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: in community: participated in public meeting
Pre-question text: Have you in the past 12 months participated in any of the following activities to improve conditions in your own neighbourhood or community?
Literal question: Participated in or taken the initiative to a public meeting to discuss issues related to conditions in the community
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2093 86.0% 0.85990140
1 Selected 260 10.7% 0.10682005
97 No answer 81 3.3% 0.03327855
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt9_2


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: in community: participated in voluntary work
Pre-question text: Have you in the past 12 months participated in any of the following activities to improve conditions in your own neighbourhood or community?
Literal question: Participated in or taken the initiative for voluntary work to fix or improve something in the community
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1414 58.1% 0.58093673
1 Selected 939 38.6% 0.38578472
97 No answer 81 3.3% 0.03327855
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt9_3


Variable label: Has in the last 12 months: in community: been involved in association
Pre-question text: Have you in the past 12 months participated in any of the following activities to improve conditions in your own neighbourhood or community?
Literal question: Become involved in a residents’ association, neighbourhood association or similar organizations in the community
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1734 71.2% 0.71240756
1 Selected 619 25.4% 0.25431389
97 No answer 81 3.3% 0.03327855
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_1


Variable label: Membership: Sports or outdoor organization
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Sports or outdoor organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1656 68.0% 0.68036154
1 Selected 694 28.5% 0.28512736
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_2


Variable label: Membership: Humanitarian aid organization
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Humanitarian aid organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1914 78.6% 0.78635990
1 Selected 436 17.9% 0.17912901
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_3


Variable label: Membership: Religious or other belief organization
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Religious or other belief organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2074 85.2% 0.85209532
1 Selected 276 11.3% 0.11339359
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_4


Variable label: Membership: Political party
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Political party
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2145 88.1% 0.88126541
1 Selected 205 8.4% 0.08422350
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_5


Variable label: Membership: Temperance organization
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Temperance organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2332 95.8% 0.958093673
1 Selected 18 0.7% 0.007395234
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.034511093
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_6


Variable label: Membership: Language organization or similar
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Language organization or similar
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2323 95.4% 0.95439606
1 Selected 27 1.1% 0.01109285
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_7


Variable label: Membership: Environmental protection/animal welfare organization
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Environmental protection/animal welfare organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2199 90.3% 0.90345111
1 Selected 151 6.2% 0.06203780
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_8


Variable label: Membership: Residents’ association/neighbourhood association
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Residents’ association/neighbourhood association/community association
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1797 73.8% 0.73829088
1 Selected 553 22.7% 0.22719803
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_9


Variable label: Membership: Housing cooperative
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Housing cooperative
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1913 78.6% 0.78594906
1 Selected 437 18.0% 0.17953985
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_10


Variable label: Membership: House owner association and land owner association
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: House owner association and land owner association
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1985 81.6% 0.81552999
1 Selected 365 15.0% 0.14995892
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_11


Variable label: Membership: Cultural association
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Cultural association (music, dance, theatre, hobby, etc.)
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2002 82.3% 0.82251438
1 Selected 348 14.3% 0.14297453
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_12


Variable label: Membership: Lodge
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Lodge
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2280 93.7% 0.93672966
1 Selected 70 2.9% 0.02875924
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_13


Variable label: Membership: Consumer organization
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Consumer organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2273 93.4% 0.93385374
1 Selected 77 3.2% 0.03163517
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_14


Variable label: Membership: Car association
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Car association
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1901 78.1% 0.78101890
1 Selected 449 18.4% 0.18447001
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_15


Variable label: Membership: Patient association or interest organization for the disabled
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Patient association or interest organization for the disabled
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2233 91.7% 0.91741988
1 Selected 117 4.8% 0.04806902
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_16


Variable label: Membership: Pensioner association
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Pensioner association
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2215 91.0% 0.91002465
1 Selected 135 5.5% 0.05546426
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_17


Variable label: Membership: Parents’ association
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Parents’ association
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2244 92.2% 0.92193919
1 Selected 106 4.4% 0.04354971
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_18


Variable label: Membership: Immigrant association
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Immigrant association
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2331 95.8% 0.957682827
1 Selected 19 0.8% 0.007806081
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.034511093
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_19


Variable label: Membership: Employee organization/trade union
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Employee organization/trade union
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1477 60.7% 0.60682005
1 Selected 873 35.9% 0.35866886
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_20


Variable label: Membership: Business and employer organization
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Business and employer organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2238 91.9% 0.91947412
1 Selected 112 4.6% 0.04601479
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_21


Variable label: Membership: Agricultural or fisheries organization
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Agricultural or fisheries organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2271 93.3% 0.93303205
1 Selected 79 3.2% 0.03245686
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt10_22


Variable label: Membership: Other
Pre-question text: Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
Literal question: Other organizations/associations
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1863 76.5% 0.76540674
1 Selected 487 20.0% 0.20008217
97 No answer 84 3.5% 0.03451109
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_1


Variable label: Position of trust: Sports or outdoor organization
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Sports or outdoor organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 534 21.9% 0.21939195
1 Selected 160 6.6% 0.06573541
97 No answer 1740 71.5% 0.71487264
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_2


Variable label: Position of trust: Humanitarian aid organization
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Humanitarian aid organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 404 16.6% 0.16598192
1 Selected 32 1.3% 0.01314708
97 No answer 1998 82.1% 0.82087099
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_3


Variable label: Position of trust: Religious or other belief organization
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Religious or other belief organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 196 8.1% 0.08052588
1 Selected 80 3.3% 0.03286771
97 No answer 2158 88.7% 0.88660641
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_4


Variable label: Position of trust: Political party
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Political party
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 158 6.5% 0.06491372
1 Selected 47 1.9% 0.01930978
97 No answer 2229 91.6% 0.91577650
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_5


Variable label: Position of trust: Temperance organization
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Temperance organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 14 0.6% 0.005751849
1 Selected 4 0.2% 0.001643385
97 No answer 2416 99.3% 0.992604766
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_6


Variable label: Position of trust: Language organization or similar
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Language organization or similar
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 25 1.0% 0.0102711586
1 Selected 2 0.1% 0.0008216927
97 No answer 2407 98.9% 0.9889071487
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_7


Variable label: Position of trust: Environmental protection/animal welfare organization
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Environmental protection/animal welfare organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 133 5.5% 0.054642564
1 Selected 18 0.7% 0.007395234
97 No answer 2283 93.8% 0.937962202
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_8


Variable label: Position of trust: Residents’ association/neighbourhood association/community association
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Residents’ association/neighbourhood association/community association
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 426 17.5% 0.17502054
1 Selected 127 5.2% 0.05217749
97 No answer 1881 77.3% 0.77280197
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_9


Variable label: Position of trust: Housing cooperative
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Housing cooperative
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 348 14.3% 0.14297453
1 Selected 89 3.7% 0.03656532
97 No answer 1997 82.0% 0.82046015
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_10


Variable label: Position of trust: House owner association and land owner association
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: House owner association and land owner association
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 342 14.1% 0.140509449
1 Selected 23 0.9% 0.009449466
97 No answer 2069 85.0% 0.850041085
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_11


Variable label: Position of trust: Cultural association
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Cultural association (music, dance, theatre, hobby, etc.)
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 262 10.8% 0.10764174
1 Selected 86 3.5% 0.03533279
97 No answer 2086 85.7% 0.85702547
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_12


Variable label: Position of trust: Lodge
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Lodge
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 51 2.1% 0.020953164
1 Selected 19 0.8% 0.007806081
97 No answer 2364 97.1% 0.971240756
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_13


Variable label: Position of trust: Consumer organization
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Consumer organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 75 3.1% 0.0308134758
1 Selected 2 0.1% 0.0008216927
97 No answer 2357 96.8% 0.9683648316
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_14


Variable label: Position of trust: Car association
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Car association
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 437 18.0% 0.179539852
1 Selected 12 0.5% 0.004930156
97 No answer 1985 81.6% 0.815529992
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_15


Variable label: Position of trust: Patient association or interest organization for the disabled
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Patient association or interest organization for the disabled
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 103 4.2% 0.042317173
1 Selected 14 0.6% 0.005751849
97 No answer 2317 95.2% 0.951930978
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_16


Variable label: Position of trust: Pensioner association
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Pensioner association
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 113 4.6% 0.04642564
1 Selected 22 0.9% 0.00903862
97 No answer 2299 94.5% 0.94453574
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_17


Variable label: Position of trust: Parents’ association
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Parents’ association
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 64 2.6% 0.02629417
1 Selected 42 1.7% 0.01725555
97 No answer 2328 95.6% 0.95645029
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_18


Variable label: Position of trust: Immigrant association
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Immigrant association
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 11 0.5% 0.004519310
1 Selected 8 0.3% 0.003286771
97 No answer 2415 99.2% 0.992193919
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_19


Variable label: Position of trust: Employee organization/trade union
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Employee organization/trade union
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 766 31.5% 0.31470830
1 Selected 107 4.4% 0.04396056
97 No answer 1561 64.1% 0.64133114
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_20


Variable label: Position of trust: Business and employer organization
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Business and employer organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 83 3.4% 0.03410025
1 Selected 29 1.2% 0.01191454
97 No answer 2322 95.4% 0.95398521
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_21


Variable label: Position of trust: Agricultural or fisheries organization
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Agricultural or fisheries organization
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 65 2.7% 0.026705012
1 Selected 14 0.6% 0.005751849
97 No answer 2355 96.8% 0.967543139
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt11_22


Variable label: Position of trust: Other
Pre-question text: Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
Literal question: Other organizations/associations
Technical description: Check if yes.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 373 15.3% 0.15324569
1 Selected 114 4.7% 0.04683648
97 No answer 1947 80.0% 0.79991783
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt12


Variable label: Would attempt to influence political process regarding controversial measure
Literal question: Let’s assume that the Storting is discussing a new measure that you consider to be completely unreasonable. How likely is it that you would attempt to do something to affect the outcome?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very likely 79 3.2% 0.03245686
2 Likely 250 10.3% 0.10271159
3 Somewhat likely 683 28.1% 0.28060805
4 Not very likely 1016 41.7% 0.41741988
5 Not likely at all 267 11.0% 0.10969597
97 No answer 139 5.7% 0.05710764
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dt13


Variable label: Means to influence political process
Literal question: If you wanted to affect the outcome of an issue, what would be your favoured procedure?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Would write a letter to the newspaper 340 14.0% 0.13968776
2 Would work to get media coverage elsewhere 219 9.0% 0.08997535
3 Would discuss the matter with the party or other organization I am a member of 147 6.0% 0.06039441
4 Would contact a politician 261 10.7% 0.10723090
5 Would contact an employee of the ministry concerned 100 4.1% 0.04108463
6 Would organize a petition 89 3.7% 0.03656532
7 Would organize a demonstration 28 1.2% 0.01150370
8 Not sure 923 37.9% 0.37921118
9 Other ways 121 5.0% 0.04971241
97 No answer 206 8.5% 0.08463435
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_km34


Variable label: Norway morally obligated to reduce emissions
Literal question: To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “Rich countries like Norway have a moral obligation to show international leadership by reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.”
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 508 20.9% 0.20870994
2 Agree 680 27.9% 0.27937551
3 Agree somewhat 572 23.5% 0.23500411
4 Neither agree nor disagree 251 10.3% 0.10312243
5 Disagree somewhat 114 4.7% 0.04683648
6 Disagree 98 4.0% 0.04026294
7 Strongly disagree 68 2.8% 0.02793755
97 No answer 143 5.9% 0.05875103
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_grup


Variable label: Randomizes if U=2
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=2 into two groups and selects pairwise the following questions: DV1 - DV14
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2344] [Invalid:2561] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1163 49.6% 0.4961604
2 1181 50.4% 0.5038396
Sysmiss 2561 NA

w01_dv1


Variable label: Benefit for Norway that people from other countries settles down here
Literal question: How great an advantage or disadvantage would you say it is for Norway that people from other countries come to live here?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very great advantage 37 3.2% 0.03181427
2 Great advantage 177 15.2% 0.15219261
3 A certain advantage 420 36.1% 0.36113500
4 Neither an advantage nor disadvantage 172 14.8% 0.14789338
5 A certain disadvantage 215 18.5% 0.18486672
6 A great disadvantage 73 6.3% 0.06276870
7 A very great disadvantage 37 3.2% 0.03181427
97 No answer 32 2.8% 0.02751505
98 Not asked 3742 NA

w01_dv2


Variable label: Benefit for Norway that immigrants settles down here
Literal question: How great an advantage or disadvantage would you say it is for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very great advantage 37 3.1% 0.03132938
2 Great advantage 181 15.3% 0.15325995
3 A certain advantage 402 34.0% 0.34038950
4 Neither an advantage nor disadvantage 169 14.3% 0.14309907
5 A certain disadvantage 237 20.1% 0.20067739
6 A great disadvantage 72 6.1% 0.06096528
7 A very great disadvantage 48 4.1% 0.04064352
97 No answer 35 3.0% 0.02963590
98 Not asked 3724 NA

w01_dv3


Variable label: Policies aimed at people from other countries that settle down personally important
Literal question: How important are policies aimed at people from other countries who come to live in Norway to you personally?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 194 16.7% 0.16680997
2 Important 442 38.0% 0.38005159
3 Somewhat important 349 30.0% 0.30008598
4 Not very important 114 9.8% 0.09802236
5 Not important at all 24 2.1% 0.02063629
97 No answer 40 3.4% 0.03439381
98 Not asked 3742 NA

w01_dv4


Variable label: Immigration policy imporant personally
Literal question: How important is immigration policy to you personally?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 156 13.2% 0.13209145
2 Important 433 36.7% 0.36663844
3 Somewhat important 444 37.6% 0.37595258
4 Not very important 115 9.7% 0.09737511
5 Not important at all 18 1.5% 0.01524132
97 No answer 15 1.3% 0.01270110
98 Not asked 3724 NA

w01_dv5


Variable label: Party with best policy regarding settlement of foreigners
Literal question: Which political party do you believe has the best policy aimed at people who come from other countries to live in Norway?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Labour Party 239 20.6% 0.205503009
2 The Progress Party 247 21.2% 0.212381771
3 The Conservative Party 174 15.0% 0.149613070
4 The Socialist Left Party 111 9.5% 0.095442820
5 The Centre Party 9 0.8% 0.007738607
6 The Christian Democratic Party 61 5.2% 0.052450559
7 The Liberal Party 75 6.4% 0.064488392
8 Red 24 2.1% 0.020636285
9 The Green Party 6 0.5% 0.005159071
10 Others (Note) 7 0.6% 0.006018917
11 None 121 10.4% 0.104041273
97 No answer 89 7.7% 0.076526225
98 Not asked 3742 NA

w01_dv5_10_other


Variable label: Other: Party with best policy regarding settlement of foreigners [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Which political party do you believe has the best policy aimed at people who come from other countries to live in Norway?
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_dv6


Variable label: Party with the best immigration policy
Literal question: In your opinion, which political party has the best immigration policy?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Labour Party 222 18.8% 0.18797629
2 The Progress Party 277 23.5% 0.23454699
3 The Conservative Party 203 17.2% 0.17188823
4 The Socialist Left Party 81 6.9% 0.06858594
5 The Centre Party 12 1.0% 0.01016088
6 The Christian Democratic Party 62 5.2% 0.05249788
7 The Liberal Party 61 5.2% 0.05165114
8 Red 27 2.3% 0.02286198
9 The Green Party 7 0.6% 0.00592718
10 Others (Note) 12 1.0% 0.01016088
11 None 141 11.9% 0.11939035
97 No answer 76 6.4% 0.06435224
98 Not asked 3724 NA

w01_dv6_10_other


Variable label: Other: Party with best immigration policy [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: In your opinion, which political party has the best immigration policy?
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_dv7


Variable label: Share of foreigners in community
Literal question: If you consider people in your community or school district, around how many have come from a different country to live there or have at least one parent who has come from another country?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 All, or nearly all 12 1.0% 0.01031814
2 Many (more than half) 48 4.1% 0.04127257
3 Around half 69 5.9% 0.05932932
4 Some (fewer than half) 756 65.0% 0.65004299
5 None, or nearly none 234 20.1% 0.20120378
97 No answer 44 3.8% 0.03783319
98 Not asked 3742 NA

w01_dv8


Variable label: Share of immigrants in community
Literal question: If you consider people in your community or school district, around how many have immigrated or have at least one parent who has immigrated?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 All, or nearly all 10 0.8% 0.008467401
2 Many (more than half) 59 5.0% 0.049957663
3 Around half 84 7.1% 0.071126164
4 Some (fewer than half) 695 58.8% 0.588484335
5 None, or nearly none 284 24.0% 0.240474174
97 No answer 49 4.1% 0.041490262
98 Not asked 3724 NA

w01_dv9


Variable label: Encounters with foreigners in daily life
Literal question: Imagine people you randomly encounter in your daily life, for example on the bus, at the shop or in your neighbourhood. How often would you say that you encounter people who have come from other countries to live here?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Every day 725 62.3% 0.623387790
2 Weekly 218 18.7% 0.187446260
3 A few times a month 124 10.7% 0.106620808
4 More seldom, but it has occurred 53 4.6% 0.045571797
5 Never 5 0.4% 0.004299226
97 No answer 38 3.3% 0.032674119
98 Not asked 3742 NA

w01_dv10


Variable label: Encounters with immigrants in daily life
Literal question: Imagine people you randomly encounter in your daily life, for example on the bus, at the shop or in your neighbourhood. How often would you say you encounter immigrants?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Every day 866 73.3% 0.7332768840
2 Weekly 191 16.2% 0.1617273497
3 A few times a month 76 6.4% 0.0643522439
4 More seldom, but it has occurred 31 2.6% 0.0262489416
5 Never 1 0.1% 0.0008467401
97 No answer 16 1.4% 0.0135478408
98 Not asked 3724 NA

w01_dv11


Variable label: Experience of meeting foreigners
Literal question: How good or bad an experience have these short, random encounters been?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 87 7.5% 0.074806535
2 Good 375 32.2% 0.322441960
3 Somewhat good 93 8.0% 0.079965606
4 Neither good nor bad 471 40.5% 0.404987102
5 Somewhat bad 53 4.6% 0.045571797
6 Bad 24 2.1% 0.020636285
7 Very bad 6 0.5% 0.005159071
97 No answer 54 4.6% 0.046431642
98 Not asked 3742 NA

w01_dv12


Variable label: Experience of meeting immigrants
Literal question: How good or bad an experience have these short, random encounters been?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 98 8.3% 0.08298052
2 Good 377 31.9% 0.31922100
3 Somewhat good 81 6.9% 0.06858594
4 Neither good nor bad 519 43.9% 0.43945809
5 Somewhat bad 46 3.9% 0.03895004
6 Bad 28 2.4% 0.02370872
7 Very bad 8 0.7% 0.00677392
97 No answer 24 2.0% 0.02032176
98 Not asked 3724 NA

w01_dv13


Variable label: Share of friends that are foreigners
Literal question: How many of your close friends have come from another country to live in Norway or have parents (mother, father or both parents) who have come from another country to live in Norway?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 All, or nearly all 11 0.9% 0.009458298
2 Many (more than half) 46 4.0% 0.039552880
3 Around half 66 5.7% 0.056749785
4 Some (fewer than half) 454 39.0% 0.390369733
5 None, or nearly none 557 47.9% 0.478933792
97 No answer 29 2.5% 0.024935512
98 Not asked 3742 NA

w01_dv14


Variable label: Share of friends that are immigrants
Literal question: How many of your close friends have immigrated to Norway or have parents (mother, father or both parents) who have immigrated to Norway?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 All, or nearly all 9 0.8% 0.00762066
2 Many (more than half) 47 4.0% 0.03979678
3 Around half 57 4.8% 0.04826418
4 Some (fewer than half) 411 34.8% 0.34801016
5 None, or nearly none 638 54.0% 0.54022015
97 No answer 19 1.6% 0.01608806
98 Not asked 3724 NA

w01_grup2


Variable label: Randomizes independently from U
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=2 into six groups and selects one the following questions: DV15- DV20
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4709] [Invalid:196] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 788 16.7% 0.1673391
2 754 16.0% 0.1601189
3 778 16.5% 0.1652155
4 817 17.3% 0.1734976
5 789 16.8% 0.1675515
6 783 16.6% 0.1662773
Sysmiss 196 NA

w01_dv15


Variable label: Claim: Immigrans has to apply for more jobs than Norwegians, according to 1800 job applications
Literal question: Research based on 1,800 job applications concludes that Norwegians with immigrant backgrounds must apply for far more jobs than others in order to be called for an interview. To which extent do you agree that this is the case in Norway just now?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 178 22.6% 0.22588832
2 Agree 294 37.3% 0.37309645
3 Agree somewhat 132 16.8% 0.16751269
4 Neither agree nor disagree 85 10.8% 0.10786802
5 Disagree somewhat 26 3.3% 0.03299492
6 Disagree 31 3.9% 0.03934010
7 Strongly disagree 17 2.2% 0.02157360
97 No answer 25 3.2% 0.03172589
98 Not asked 4117 NA

w01_dv16


Variable label: Claim: Immigrans has to apply for more jobs than Norwegians, according to 42 interviews
Literal question: Research based on 42 interviews with employers concludes that Norwegians with immigrant backgrounds must apply for far more jobs than others in order to be called for an interview. To which extent do you agree that this is the case in Norway just now?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 158 21.0% 0.20954907
2 Agree 306 40.6% 0.40583554
3 Agree somewhat 141 18.7% 0.18700265
4 Neither agree nor disagree 75 9.9% 0.09946950
5 Disagree somewhat 22 2.9% 0.02917772
6 Disagree 27 3.6% 0.03580902
7 Strongly disagree 10 1.3% 0.01326260
97 No answer 15 2.0% 0.01989390
98 Not asked 4151 NA

w01_dv17


Variable label: Claim: Immigrans has to apply for more jobs than Norwegians, according to research
Literal question: Research concludes that Norwegians with immigrant backgrounds must apply for far more jobs than others in order to be called for an interview. To which extent do you agree that this is the case in Norway just now?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 175 22.5% 0.22493573
2 Agree 302 38.8% 0.38817481
3 Agree somewhat 134 17.2% 0.17223650
4 Neither agree nor disagree 96 12.3% 0.12339332
5 Disagree somewhat 29 3.7% 0.03727506
6 Disagree 21 2.7% 0.02699229
7 Strongly disagree 9 1.2% 0.01156812
97 No answer 12 1.5% 0.01542416
98 Not asked 4127 NA

w01_dv18


Variable label: Claim: Immigrans has to apply for more jobs than Norwegians, according to a governmental ministry
Literal question: A governmental ministry concludes that Norwegians with immigrant backgrounds must apply for far more jobs than others in order to be called for an interview. To which extent do you agree that this is the case in Norway just now?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 201 24.6% 0.24602203
2 Agree 308 37.7% 0.37698898
3 Agree somewhat 142 17.4% 0.17380661
4 Neither agree nor disagree 84 10.3% 0.10281518
5 Disagree somewhat 26 3.2% 0.03182375
6 Disagree 25 3.1% 0.03059976
7 Strongly disagree 16 2.0% 0.01958384
97 No answer 15 1.8% 0.01835985
98 Not asked 4088 NA

w01_dv19


Variable label: Claim: Immigrans has to apply for more jobs than Norwegians, according to The Norwegian Centre against Racism
Literal question: The Norwegian Centre against Racism concludes that Norwegians with immigrant backgrounds must apply for far more jobs than others in order to be called for an interview. To which extent do you agree that this is the case in Norway just now?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 178 22.6% 0.22560203
2 Agree 296 37.5% 0.37515843
3 Agree somewhat 128 16.2% 0.16223067
4 Neither agree nor disagree 117 14.8% 0.14828897
5 Disagree somewhat 14 1.8% 0.01774398
6 Disagree 26 3.3% 0.03295311
7 Strongly disagree 15 1.9% 0.01901141
97 No answer 15 1.9% 0.01901141
98 Not asked 4116 NA

w01_dv20


Variable label: Claim: Immigrans has to apply for more jobs than Norwegians, according to public debate
Literal question: Social debate participants conclude that Norwegians with immigrant backgrounds must apply for far more jobs than others in order to be called for an interview. To which extent do you agree that this is the case in Norway just now?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 163 20.8% 0.20817369
2 Agree 313 40.0% 0.39974457
3 Agree somewhat 136 17.4% 0.17369093
4 Neither agree nor disagree 109 13.9% 0.13920817
5 Disagree somewhat 21 2.7% 0.02681992
6 Disagree 17 2.2% 0.02171137
7 Strongly disagree 9 1.1% 0.01149425
97 No answer 15 1.9% 0.01915709
98 Not asked 4122 NA

w01_grup3


Variable label: Randomizes if U=2
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=2 into four groups and selects one the following questions: DV21-25
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2338] [Invalid:2567] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 642 27.5% 0.2745937
2 559 23.9% 0.2390932
3 591 25.3% 0.2527802
4 546 23.4% 0.2335329
Sysmiss 2567 NA

w01_dv21


Variable label: Allow Muslim schools
Literal question: Some Muslims in Norway wish to send their children to Islamic schools that follow the Norwegian curriculum but additionally teach Islam. To which extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway should be permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 14 2.2% 0.02180685
2 Agree 47 7.3% 0.07320872
3 Agree somewhat 64 10.0% 0.09968847
4 Neither agree nor disagree 83 12.9% 0.12928349
5 Disagree somewhat 95 14.8% 0.14797508
6 Disagree 139 21.7% 0.21651090
7 Strongly disagree 181 28.2% 0.28193146
97 No answer 19 3.0% 0.02959502
98 Not asked 4263 NA

w01_dv22


Variable label: Allow Muslim schools, even though it may disrupt integration, according to public debate
Literal question: Some Muslims in Norway wish to send their children to Islamic schools that follow the Norwegian curriculum but additionally teach Islam. Some participants in the social debate have argued against such schools because they believe they obstruct integration. To which extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway should be permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 19 3.4% 0.03398927
2 Agree 35 6.3% 0.06261181
3 Agree somewhat 43 7.7% 0.07692308
4 Neither agree nor disagree 62 11.1% 0.11091234
5 Disagree somewhat 91 16.3% 0.16279070
6 Disagree 134 24.0% 0.23971377
7 Strongly disagree 164 29.3% 0.29338104
97 No answer 11 2.0% 0.01967800
98 Not asked 4346 NA

w01_dv23


Variable label: Allow Muslim schools, even though it may disrupt integration, according to Progress Party
Literal question: Some Muslims in Norway wish to send their children to Islamic schools that follow the Norwegian curriculum but additionally teach Islam. Certain Progress Party politicians have argued against such schools because they believe they obstruct integration. To which extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway should be permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 20 3.4% 0.03384095
2 Agree 47 8.0% 0.07952623
3 Agree somewhat 77 13.0% 0.13028765
4 Neither agree nor disagree 70 11.8% 0.11844332
5 Disagree somewhat 86 14.6% 0.14551607
6 Disagree 119 20.1% 0.20135364
7 Strongly disagree 160 27.1% 0.27072758
97 No answer 12 2.0% 0.02030457
98 Not asked 4314 NA

w01_dv24


Variable label: Allow Muslim schools, even though it may disrupt integration, according to Labour Party
Literal question: Some Muslims in Norway wish to send their children to Islamic schools that follow the Norwegian curriculum but additionally teach Islam. Certain Labour Party politicians have argued against such schools because they believe they obstruct integration. To which extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway should be permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 18 3.3% 0.03296703
2 Agree 29 5.3% 0.05311355
3 Agree somewhat 48 8.8% 0.08791209
4 Neither agree nor disagree 57 10.4% 0.10439560
5 Disagree somewhat 84 15.4% 0.15384615
6 Disagree 136 24.9% 0.24908425
7 Strongly disagree 163 29.9% 0.29853480
97 No answer 11 2.0% 0.02014652
98 Not asked 4359 NA

w01_grup4


Variable label: Randomizes if U=2
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=2 into four groups and selects one the following questions: DV25-28
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:2570] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 579 24.8% 0.2479657
2 619 26.5% 0.2650964
3 564 24.2% 0.2415418
4 573 24.5% 0.2453961
Sysmiss 2570 NA

w01_dv25


Variable label: Claim: Muslim culture should be respected
Pre-question text: To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: Muslims in Norway are entitled to respect for their traditions and culture.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 61 10.5% 0.10535406
2 Agree 140 24.2% 0.24179620
3 Agree somewhat 162 28.0% 0.27979275
4 Neither agree nor disagree 51 8.8% 0.08808290
5 Disagree somewhat 67 11.6% 0.11571675
6 Disagree 36 6.2% 0.06217617
7 Strongly disagree 48 8.3% 0.08290155
97 No answer 14 2.4% 0.02417962
98 Not asked 4326 NA

w01_dv26


Variable label: Claim: Muslim culture should be protected
Pre-question text: To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: Muslims in Norway are entitled to protection of their traditions and culture.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 13 2.1% 0.02100162
2 Agree 52 8.4% 0.08400646
3 Agree somewhat 150 24.2% 0.24232633
4 Neither agree nor disagree 79 12.8% 0.12762520
5 Disagree somewhat 129 20.8% 0.20840065
6 Disagree 99 16.0% 0.15993538
7 Strongly disagree 88 14.2% 0.14216478
97 No answer 9 1.5% 0.01453958
98 Not asked 4286 NA

w01_dv27


Variable label: Claim: Immigrant culture should be respected
Pre-question text: To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: Immigrants in Norway are entitled to respect for their traditions and culture.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 47 8.3% 0.08333333
2 Agree 161 28.5% 0.28546099
3 Agree somewhat 174 30.9% 0.30851064
4 Neither agree nor disagree 44 7.8% 0.07801418
5 Disagree somewhat 72 12.8% 0.12765957
6 Disagree 28 5.0% 0.04964539
7 Strongly disagree 28 5.0% 0.04964539
97 No answer 10 1.8% 0.01773050
98 Not asked 4341 NA

w01_dv28


Variable label: Claim: Immigrant culture should be protected
Pre-question text: To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: Immigrants in Norway are entitled to protection of their traditions and culture.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 17 3.0% 0.02966841
2 Agree 79 13.8% 0.13787086
3 Agree somewhat 146 25.5% 0.25479930
4 Neither agree nor disagree 71 12.4% 0.12390925
5 Disagree somewhat 112 19.5% 0.19546248
6 Disagree 73 12.7% 0.12739965
7 Strongly disagree 64 11.2% 0.11169284
97 No answer 11 1.9% 0.01919721
98 Not asked 4332 NA

w01_dv29_1


Variable label: Statement: Refugees should be entitled to social services
Pre-question text: Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question: Refugees should have the same right to social services as Norwegians, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 166 6.8% 0.06820049
2 Agree 513 21.1% 0.21076417
3 Agree somewhat 438 18.0% 0.17995070
4 Neither agree nor disagree 212 8.7% 0.08709942
5 Disagree somewhat 328 13.5% 0.13475760
6 Disagree 359 14.7% 0.14749384
7 Strongly disagree 245 10.1% 0.10065735
97 No answer 173 7.1% 0.07107642
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dv29_2


Variable label: Statement: Begging should be banned
Pre-question text: Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question: Begging should be banned in Norway.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 833 34.2% 0.34223500
2 Agree 515 21.2% 0.21158587
3 Agree somewhat 321 13.2% 0.13188168
4 Neither agree nor disagree 218 9.0% 0.08956450
5 Disagree somewhat 148 6.1% 0.06080526
6 Disagree 144 5.9% 0.05916187
7 Strongly disagree 87 3.6% 0.03574363
97 No answer 168 6.9% 0.06902219
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dv29_3


Variable label: Statement: Norway will lose it’s identity if more Muslims come to live here
Pre-question text: Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question: Norway will lose its identity if more Muslims come to live here.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 284 11.7% 0.11668036
2 Agree 287 11.8% 0.11791290
3 Agree somewhat 440 18.1% 0.18077239
4 Neither agree nor disagree 351 14.4% 0.14420707
5 Disagree somewhat 299 12.3% 0.12284306
6 Disagree 395 16.2% 0.16228431
7 Strongly disagree 208 8.5% 0.08545604
97 No answer 170 7.0% 0.06984388
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dv29_4


Variable label: Statement: Norwegian muslims more loyal to other muslims
Pre-question text: Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question: Norwegian Muslims are more loyal to other Muslims in the world than to the people of this country.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 284 11.7% 0.11668036
2 Agree 389 16.0% 0.15981923
3 Agree somewhat 452 18.6% 0.18570255
4 Neither agree nor disagree 733 30.1% 0.30115037
5 Disagree somewhat 158 6.5% 0.06491372
6 Disagree 167 6.9% 0.06861134
7 Strongly disagree 69 2.8% 0.02834840
97 No answer 182 7.5% 0.07477403
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dv29_5


Variable label: Statement: Better for a country if most people share the same traditions and customs
Pre-question text: Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question: It is better for a country if nearly everyone shares the same traditions and customs.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 214 8.8% 0.08792112
2 Agree 317 13.0% 0.13023829
3 Agree somewhat 411 16.9% 0.16885785
4 Neither agree nor disagree 409 16.8% 0.16803615
5 Disagree somewhat 370 15.2% 0.15201315
6 Disagree 375 15.4% 0.15406738
7 Strongly disagree 165 6.8% 0.06778965
97 No answer 173 7.1% 0.07107642
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_dv33


Variable label: Foreigners are better off compared to people like me
Literal question: In your opinion, how much better or worse off are the majority of people who have come to live in Norway compared to people like you?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much better 12 1.0% 0.01031814
2 Better 32 2.8% 0.02751505
3 Somewhat better 54 4.6% 0.04643164
4 Neither better nor worse 348 29.9% 0.29922614
5 Somewhat worse 296 25.5% 0.25451419
6 Worse 300 25.8% 0.25795357
7 Much worse 70 6.0% 0.06018917
97 No answer 51 4.4% 0.04385211
98 Not asked 3742 NA

w01_dv34


Variable label: Immigrans are better off compared to people like me
Literal question: In your opinion, how much better or worse off are the majority of people who have immigrated to Norway compared to people like you?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much better 12 1.0% 0.01016088
2 Better 40 3.4% 0.03386960
3 Somewhat better 52 4.4% 0.04403048
4 Neither better nor worse 399 33.8% 0.33784928
5 Somewhat worse 380 32.2% 0.32176122
6 Worse 205 17.4% 0.17358171
7 Much worse 41 3.5% 0.03471634
97 No answer 52 4.4% 0.04403048
98 Not asked 3724 NA

w01_grup5


Variable label: Randomizes independently from U
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=2 into two groups and selects one of the following questions: DV35 or DV38
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4693] [Invalid:212] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 2316 49.4% 0.493501
2 2377 50.6% 0.506499
Sysmiss 212 NA

w01_dv35_1


Variable label: Fitting description: Important not to not have prejudices towards immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poor would you say that the following description fits you:
Literal question: It is important to me personally to be unprejudiced towards immigrants.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 401 17.3% 0.17314335
2 Good 833 36.0% 0.35967185
3 Somewhat good 450 19.4% 0.19430052
4 Neither good nor bad 352 15.2% 0.15198618
5 Somewhat bad 127 5.5% 0.05483592
6 Bad 34 1.5% 0.01468048
7 Very bad 32 1.4% 0.01381693
97 No answer 87 3.8% 0.03756477
98 Not asked 2589 NA

w01_dv35_2


Variable label: Fitting description: Don’t want to appear racist
Pre-question text: How well or poor would you say that the following description fits you:
Literal question: I would not like to be perceived as racist, not even unto myself.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 519 22.4% 0.22409326
2 Good 794 34.3% 0.34283247
3 Somewhat good 346 14.9% 0.14939551
4 Neither good nor bad 357 15.4% 0.15414508
5 Somewhat bad 121 5.2% 0.05224525
6 Bad 54 2.3% 0.02331606
7 Very bad 26 1.1% 0.01122625
97 No answer 99 4.3% 0.04274611
98 Not asked 2589 NA

w01_dv35_3


Variable label: Fitting description: Feel guilty about negative feeling towards immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poor would you say that the following description fits you:
Literal question: I feel guilty if I have negative feelings towards immigrants.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 176 7.6% 0.07599309
2 Good 368 15.9% 0.15889465
3 Somewhat good 358 15.5% 0.15457686
4 Neither good nor bad 577 24.9% 0.24913644
5 Somewhat bad 272 11.7% 0.11744387
6 Bad 290 12.5% 0.12521589
7 Very bad 176 7.6% 0.07599309
97 No answer 99 4.3% 0.04274611
98 Not asked 2589 NA

w01_dv35_4


Variable label: Fitting description: Trying not to not have prejudices towards immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poor would you say that the following description fits you:
Literal question: I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants due to my own conviction.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 360 15.5% 0.15544041
2 Good 747 32.3% 0.32253886
3 Somewhat good 393 17.0% 0.16968912
4 Neither good nor bad 475 20.5% 0.20509499
5 Somewhat bad 113 4.9% 0.04879102
6 Bad 77 3.3% 0.03324698
7 Very bad 48 2.1% 0.02072539
97 No answer 103 4.4% 0.04447323
98 Not asked 2589 NA

w01_dv36_recode


Variable label: Directly affected by July 22nd
Literal question: As you know, Anders Behring Breivik perpetrated the worst terrorist attack on Norwegian soil in peacetime on Friday 22 July 2011. 77 people lost their lives A lot of people in Norway were directly affected either because they were closely related to or knew some of the victims, or they were close to the events in other ways. What about you, were you directly affected?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes, I personally, a family member, close friend, or an acquaintance was in danger during the attacks, or a family member, close friend or an acquaintance was killed in the attacks 695 14.2% 0.14169215
2 No, I wasn't affected in this respect 3631 74.0% 0.74026504
3 Other 262 5.3% 0.05341488
97 No answer 317 6.5% 0.06462793

w01_dv36_5_other


Variable label: Other: Directly affected by July 22nd [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Other:
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_dv37_1


Variable label: Reaction: Remember where I was when the news came
Pre-question text: A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
Literal question: I remember where I was when I got the news
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 2721 69.9% 0.69894683
2 Good 576 14.8% 0.14795787
3 Somewhat good 126 3.2% 0.03236578
4 Neither good nor bad 132 3.4% 0.03390701
5 Somewhat bad 49 1.3% 0.01258669
6 Bad 88 2.3% 0.02260468
7 Very bad 109 2.8% 0.02799897
97 No answer 92 2.4% 0.02363216
98 Not asked 1012 NA

w01_dv37_2


Variable label: Reaction: Remember who I was with when the news came
Pre-question text: A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
Literal question: I remember who I was with when I got the news
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 2570 66.0% 0.66015926
2 Good 598 15.4% 0.15360904
3 Somewhat good 130 3.3% 0.03339327
4 Neither good nor bad 181 4.6% 0.04649371
5 Somewhat bad 52 1.3% 0.01335731
6 Bad 116 3.0% 0.02979707
7 Very bad 130 3.3% 0.03339327
97 No answer 116 3.0% 0.02979707
98 Not asked 1012 NA

w01_dv37_3


Variable label: Reaction: Paid close attention to the news
Pre-question text: A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
Literal question: I followed the news with extra interest in the time following the events
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 2355 60.5% 0.604931929
2 Good 917 23.6% 0.235550989
3 Somewhat good 297 7.6% 0.076290778
4 Neither good nor bad 124 3.2% 0.031852042
5 Somewhat bad 50 1.3% 0.012843565
6 Bad 30 0.8% 0.007706139
7 Very bad 41 1.1% 0.010531724
97 No answer 79 2.0% 0.020292833
98 Not asked 1012 NA

w01_dv37_4


Variable label: Reaction: Was saddend
Pre-question text: A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
Literal question: I was sad
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 2181 56.0% 0.56023632
2 Good 919 23.6% 0.23606473
3 Somewhat good 331 8.5% 0.08502440
4 Neither good nor bad 222 5.7% 0.05702543
5 Somewhat bad 42 1.1% 0.01078859
6 Bad 45 1.2% 0.01155921
7 Very bad 46 1.2% 0.01181608
97 No answer 107 2.7% 0.02748523
98 Not asked 1012 NA

w01_dv37_5


Variable label: Reaction: Got angry
Pre-question text: A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
Literal question: I was angry
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 1553 39.9% 0.39892114
2 Good 804 20.7% 0.20652453
3 Somewhat good 494 12.7% 0.12689443
4 Neither good nor bad 521 13.4% 0.13382995
5 Somewhat bad 142 3.6% 0.03647573
6 Bad 150 3.9% 0.03853070
7 Very bad 102 2.6% 0.02620087
97 No answer 127 3.3% 0.03262266
98 Not asked 1012 NA

w01_dv37_6


Variable label: Reaction: Discussed events with friends and relatives
Pre-question text: A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
Literal question: I discussed 22. July with friends and acquaintances
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 2106 54.1% 0.540970974
2 Good 1118 28.7% 0.287182122
3 Somewhat good 351 9.0% 0.090161829
4 Neither good nor bad 134 3.4% 0.034420755
5 Somewhat bad 37 1.0% 0.009504238
6 Bad 24 0.6% 0.006164911
7 Very bad 29 0.7% 0.007449268
97 No answer 94 2.4% 0.024145903
98 Not asked 1012 NA

w01_dv37_8


Variable label: Reaction: Became more interested in politics
Pre-question text: A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
Literal question: I became more interested in politics
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 202 5.2% 0.05188800
2 Good 407 10.5% 0.10454662
3 Somewhat good 663 17.0% 0.17030568
4 Neither good nor bad 1579 40.6% 0.40559979
5 Somewhat bad 227 5.8% 0.05830979
6 Bad 385 9.9% 0.09889545
7 Very bad 267 6.9% 0.06858464
97 No answer 163 4.2% 0.04187002
98 Not asked 1012 NA

w01_dv37_10


Variable label: Reaction: The attacks made no impression
Pre-question text: A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
Literal question: The attacks didn’t affect me much
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 191 4.9% 0.04906242
2 Good 151 3.9% 0.03878757
3 Somewhat good 67 1.7% 0.01721038
4 Neither good nor bad 110 2.8% 0.02825584
5 Somewhat bad 139 3.6% 0.03570511
6 Bad 638 16.4% 0.16388389
7 Very bad 2397 61.6% 0.61572052
97 No answer 200 5.1% 0.05137426
98 Not asked 1012 NA

w01_dv37_annet_1


Variable label: Other: Reaction [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text: A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
Literal question: Other:
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_dv371


Variable label: Participated in remembrance services in the period following the attacks
Literal question: Did you participate in the remembrance services in the period following the attacks?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 1133 29.1% 0.29103519
2 No 2702 69.4% 0.69406627
97 No answer 58 1.5% 0.01489854
98 Not asked 1012 NA

w01_dv372


Variable label: Joined political party or association in the period following the attacks
Literal question: Did you become a member of a political party or an association in the period after the terrorist attacks?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes, and if so which: 38 1.0% 0.00976111
2 No 3804 97.7% 0.97713845
97 No answer 51 1.3% 0.01310044
98 Not asked 1012 NA

w01_dv372_1_other


Variable label: Text: Joined political party or association in the period following the attacks [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Did you become a member of a political party or an association in the period after the terrorist attacks?
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_dv39_recode


Variable label: Think, read or talk about July 22nd
Literal question: More than two years have passed since the attacks. As for you personally, how often would you say that you think, read or talk about things that have to do with 22 July nowadays?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Weekly or more often 575 11.7% 0.11722732
2 A few times a month 1467 29.9% 0.29908257
3 Seldom or never 2537 51.7% 0.51722732
97 No answer 326 6.6% 0.06646279

w01_dv38_1


Variable label: Fitting description: Important not to not have prejudices towards immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say that the following description fits you:
Literal question: It is important to me personally to be unprejudiced towards immigrants.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 468 19.7% 0.19688683
2 Well 815 34.3% 0.34286916
3 Somewhat well 452 19.0% 0.19015566
4 Neither well nor poorly 337 14.2% 0.14177535
5 Somewhat poorly 121 5.1% 0.05090450
6 Poorly 72 3.0% 0.03029028
7 Very poorly 35 1.5% 0.01472444
97 No answer 77 3.2% 0.03239377
98 Not asked 2528 NA

w01_dv38_2


Variable label: Fitting description: Don’t want to appear racist
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say that the following description fits you:
Literal question: I would not like to be perceived as racist, not even unto myself.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 551 23.2% 0.23180480
2 Well 841 35.4% 0.35380732
3 Somewhat well 352 14.8% 0.14808582
4 Neither well nor poorly 327 13.8% 0.13756836
5 Somewhat poorly 120 5.0% 0.05048380
6 Poorly 58 2.4% 0.02440050
7 Very poorly 34 1.4% 0.01430374
97 No answer 94 4.0% 0.03954565
98 Not asked 2528 NA

w01_dv38_3


Variable label: Fitting description: Feel guilty about negative feeling towards immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say that the following description fits you:
Literal question: I feel guilty if I have negative feelings towards immigrants.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 169 7.1% 0.07109802
2 Well 367 15.4% 0.15439630
3 Somewhat well 377 15.9% 0.15860328
4 Neither well nor poorly 558 23.5% 0.23474968
5 Somewhat poorly 280 11.8% 0.11779554
6 Poorly 332 14.0% 0.13967186
7 Very poorly 193 8.1% 0.08119478
97 No answer 101 4.2% 0.04249053
98 Not asked 2528 NA

w01_dv38_4


Variable label: Fitting description: Trying not to not have prejudices towards immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say that the following description fits you:
Literal question: I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants due to my own conviction.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 380 16.0% 0.15986538
2 Well 711 29.9% 0.29911653
3 Somewhat well 426 17.9% 0.17921750
4 Neither well nor poorly 494 20.8% 0.20782499
5 Somewhat poorly 123 5.2% 0.05174590
6 Poorly 88 3.7% 0.03702146
7 Very poorly 61 2.6% 0.02566260
97 No answer 94 4.0% 0.03954565
98 Not asked 2528 NA

w01_k17_1


Variable label: Usage of media channels for news: TV
Pre-question text: How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
Literal question: TV
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 1235 25.2% 0.25178389
2 Every day 2152 43.9% 0.43873598
3 Several times a week 707 14.4% 0.14413863
4 Less frequently 390 8.0% 0.07951070
5 Never 99 2.0% 0.02018349
97 No answer 322 6.6% 0.06564730

w01_k17_2


Variable label: Usage of media channels for news: Radio
Pre-question text: How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
Literal question: Radio
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 1293 26.4% 0.26360856
2 Every day 1447 29.5% 0.29500510
3 Several times a week 821 16.7% 0.16738022
4 Less frequently 705 14.4% 0.14373089
5 Never 207 4.2% 0.04220183
97 No answer 432 8.8% 0.08807339

w01_k17_3


Variable label: Usage of media channels for news: Newspaper
Pre-question text: How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
Literal question: Printed newspapers
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 471 9.6% 0.09602446
2 Every day 1939 39.5% 0.39531091
3 Several times a week 793 16.2% 0.16167176
4 Less frequently 1077 22.0% 0.21957187
5 Never 199 4.1% 0.04057085
97 No answer 426 8.7% 0.08685015

w01_k17_4


Variable label: Usage of media channels for news: Online newspaper
Pre-question text: How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
Literal question: Online newspapers
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 1759 35.9% 0.35861366
2 Every day 1286 26.2% 0.26218145
3 Several times a week 764 15.6% 0.15575943
4 Less frequently 503 10.3% 0.10254842
5 Never 156 3.2% 0.03180428
97 No answer 437 8.9% 0.08909276

w01_k17_5


Variable label: Usage of media channels for news: Facebook
Pre-question text: How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
Literal question: Facebook
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 1003 20.4% 0.2044852
2 Every day 879 17.9% 0.1792049
3 Several times a week 506 10.3% 0.1031600
4 Less frequently 563 11.5% 0.1147808
5 Never 1362 27.8% 0.2776758
97 No answer 592 12.1% 0.1206932

w01_k17_6


Variable label: Usage of media channels for news: Twitter
Pre-question text: How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
Literal question: Twitter
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 102 2.1% 0.02079511
2 Every day 98 2.0% 0.01997961
3 Several times a week 143 2.9% 0.02915392
4 Less frequently 483 9.8% 0.09847095
5 Never 3224 65.7% 0.65728848
97 No answer 855 17.4% 0.17431193

w01_k17_7


Variable label: Usage of media channels for news: Other websites
Pre-question text: How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
Literal question: Other websites
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 639 13.0% 0.1302752
2 Every day 960 19.6% 0.1957187
3 Several times a week 995 20.3% 0.2028542
4 Less frequently 961 19.6% 0.1959225
5 Never 619 12.6% 0.1261978
97 No answer 731 14.9% 0.1490316

w01_k18_1


Variable label: Interested in media content: International news
Pre-question text: How interested are you in the following types of media content?
Literal question: International news
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 1123 22.9% 0.228950051
2 Interested 2427 49.5% 0.494801223
3 Somewhat interested 862 17.6% 0.175739042
4 Not very interested 135 2.8% 0.027522936
5 Not interested at all 24 0.5% 0.004892966
97 No answer 334 6.8% 0.068093782

w01_k18_2


Variable label: Interested in media content: Domestic news
Pre-question text: How interested are you in the following types of media content?
Literal question: Domestic news
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 1324 27.0% 0.269928644
2 Interested 2591 52.8% 0.528236493
3 Somewhat interested 547 11.2% 0.111518858
4 Not very interested 78 1.6% 0.015902141
5 Not interested at all 23 0.5% 0.004689093
97 No answer 342 7.0% 0.069724771

w01_k18_3


Variable label: Interested in media content: Local news
Pre-question text: How interested are you in the following types of media content?
Literal question: Local news
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 1451 29.6% 0.29582059
2 Interested 2168 44.2% 0.44199796
3 Somewhat interested 694 14.1% 0.14148828
4 Not very interested 217 4.4% 0.04424057
5 Not interested at all 36 0.7% 0.00733945
97 No answer 339 6.9% 0.06911315

w01_k18_4


Variable label: Interested in media content: Health/ consumer/ lifestyle
Pre-question text: How interested are you in the following types of media content?
Literal question: Health/ consumer/ lifestyle
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 718 14.6% 0.14638124
2 Interested 1785 36.4% 0.36391437
3 Somewhat interested 1390 28.3% 0.28338430
4 Not very interested 547 11.2% 0.11151886
5 Not interested at all 112 2.3% 0.02283384
97 No answer 353 7.2% 0.07196738

w01_k18_5


Variable label: Interested in media content: Debate
Pre-question text: How interested are you in the following types of media content?
Literal question: Debate
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 628 12.8% 0.12803262
2 Interested 1694 34.5% 0.34536188
3 Somewhat interested 1419 28.9% 0.28929664
4 Not very interested 628 12.8% 0.12803262
5 Not interested at all 173 3.5% 0.03527013
97 No answer 363 7.4% 0.07400612

w01_k18_6


Variable label: Interested in media content: Culture and feature
Pre-question text: How interested are you in the following types of media content?
Literal question: Culture and feature
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 415 8.5% 0.08460754
2 Interested 1327 27.1% 0.27054027
3 Somewhat interested 1639 33.4% 0.33414883
4 Not very interested 929 18.9% 0.18939857
5 Not interested at all 205 4.2% 0.04179409
97 No answer 390 8.0% 0.07951070

w01_k18_7


Variable label: Interested in media content: Entertainment and celebrity news
Pre-question text: How interested are you in the following types of media content?
Literal question: Entertainment and celebrity news
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 169 3.4% 0.03445464
2 Interested 742 15.1% 0.15127421
3 Somewhat interested 1403 28.6% 0.28603466
4 Not very interested 1631 33.3% 0.33251784
5 Not interested at all 571 11.6% 0.11641182
97 No answer 389 7.9% 0.07930683

w01_k18_8


Variable label: Interested in media content: Sports
Pre-question text: How interested are you in the following types of media content?
Literal question: Sports
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 715 14.6% 0.14576962
2 Interested 1005 20.5% 0.20489297
3 Somewhat interested 956 19.5% 0.19490316
4 Not very interested 1103 22.5% 0.22487258
5 Not interested at all 760 15.5% 0.15494393
97 No answer 366 7.5% 0.07461774

w01_k19_1


Variable label: Profile on social network: Facebook
Pre-question text: Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
Literal question: Facebook
Technical description: Flere kryss mulig.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 697 28.6% 0.28635990
1 Selected 1619 66.5% 0.66516023
97 No answer 118 4.8% 0.04847987
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_k19_2


Variable label: Profile on social network: Twitter
Pre-question text: Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
Literal question: Twitter
Technical description: Flere kryss mulig.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1900 78.1% 0.78060805
1 Selected 416 17.1% 0.17091208
97 No answer 118 4.8% 0.04847987
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_k19_3


Variable label: Profile on social network: Instagram
Pre-question text: Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
Literal question: Instagram
Technical description: Flere kryss mulig.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1834 75.3% 0.75349219
1 Selected 482 19.8% 0.19802794
97 No answer 118 4.8% 0.04847987
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_k19_4


Variable label: Profile on social network: Youtube
Pre-question text: Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
Literal question: YouTube
Technical description: Flere kryss mulig.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1822 74.9% 0.74856204
1 Selected 494 20.3% 0.20295809
97 No answer 118 4.8% 0.04847987
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_k19_5


Variable label: Profile on social network: Flickr
Pre-question text: Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
Literal question: Flickr
Technical description: Flere kryss mulig.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2236 91.9% 0.91865242
1 Selected 80 3.3% 0.03286771
97 No answer 118 4.8% 0.04847987
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_k19_6


Variable label: Profile on social network: LinkedIn
Pre-question text: Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
Literal question: LinkedIn
Technical description: Flere kryss mulig.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1826 75.0% 0.75020542
1 Selected 490 20.1% 0.20131471
97 No answer 118 4.8% 0.04847987
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_k19_7


Variable label: Profile on social network: Myspace
Pre-question text: Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
Literal question: Myspace
Technical description: Flere kryss mulig.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2268 93.2% 0.93179951
1 Selected 48 2.0% 0.01972062
97 No answer 118 4.8% 0.04847987
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_k19_8


Variable label: Profile on social network: Origo
Pre-question text: Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
Literal question: Origo
Technical description: Flere kryss mulig.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2280 93.7% 0.93672966
1 Selected 36 1.5% 0.01479047
97 No answer 118 4.8% 0.04847987
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_k19_9


Variable label: Profile on social network: Biip
Pre-question text: Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
Literal question: Biip
Technical description: Flere kryss mulig.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2287 94.0% 0.93960559
1 Selected 29 1.2% 0.01191454
97 No answer 118 4.8% 0.04847987
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_k19_10


Variable label: Profile on social network: Other
Pre-question text: Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
Literal question: Other
Technical description: Flere kryss mulig.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 2057 84.5% 0.84511093
1 Selected 259 10.6% 0.10640920
97 No answer 118 4.8% 0.04847987
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_k19_11


Variable label: Profile on social network: None
Pre-question text: Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
Literal question: None
Technical description: Flere kryss mulig.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1829 75.1% 0.75143796
1 Selected 487 20.0% 0.20008217
97 No answer 118 4.8% 0.04847987
98 Not asked 2471 NA

w01_k20


Variable label: Description of employment
Literal question: Which of the descriptions fits best with what you have done for the past 7 days?
Technical description: Check one option.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In paid work (or temporarily absent) 2890 58.9% 0.589194699
2 In education (not paid for by employer) 391 8.0% 0.079714577
3 Unemployed and actively seeking work 100 2.0% 0.020387360
4 Unemployed, want a job but not actively seeking work 27 0.6% 0.005504587
5 Permanently ill or disabled 174 3.5% 0.035474006
6 Retired 702 14.3% 0.143119266
7 In civilian national service or military service 12 0.2% 0.002446483
8 Staying at home, looking after children or other persons 90 1.8% 0.018348624
9 Other 207 4.2% 0.042201835
97 No answer 312 6.4% 0.063608563

w01_k21


Variable label: Type of business
Literal question: Which type of business do you work in?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 State, county or municipal administration 246 8.5% 0.085121107
2 Public sector (e.g. school and health services) 811 28.1% 0.280622837
3 Publicly owned enterprise 191 6.6% 0.066089965
4 Private business 1385 47.9% 0.479238754
5 Self-employed 162 5.6% 0.056055363
6 Other: 88 3.0% 0.030449827
97 No answer 7 0.2% 0.002422145
98 Not asked 2015 NA

w01_k21_6_other


Variable label: Other: Type of business [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Which type of business do you work in?
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k23


Variable label: Text: Description of profession [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What kind of work do you primarily do in your main profession?
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k23a


Variable label: Text: Name or title of profession [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What is the name or title of your main profession?
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k23b


Variable label: Responsible for supervising employees
Literal question: Are you responsible for supervising the work of other employees in your main work?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 1952 67.5% 0.675432526
2 Yes, I supervise 10 or more employees 342 11.8% 0.118339100
3 Yes, I supervise 10 or less employees 577 20.0% 0.199653979
97 No answer 19 0.7% 0.006574394
98 Not asked 2015 NA

w01_k24


Variable label: Work in gas or oil manufacturing
Literal question: Is your workplace in the oil and gas sector, or closely related to it?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes, I work in the oil and gas sector 146 5.1% 0.050519031
2 Yes, my work is closely related to the oil and gas sector 151 5.2% 0.052249135
3 No 2569 88.9% 0.888927336
97 No answer 24 0.8% 0.008304498
98 Not asked 2015 NA

w01_k25_1


Variable label: Gross annual income
Pre-question text: What is your current income?
Literal question: Gross annual income is:
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-8500000]


w01_k26


Variable label: Highest completed education
Literal question: What is your highest completed education?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No completed education 28 0.6% 0.005708461
2 Primary school (first part of compulsory education) 28 0.6% 0.005708461
3 Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school, secondary school) 449 9.2% 0.091539246
4 College certificate 58 1.2% 0.011824669
5 Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education programme, one-year post admission 675 13.8% 0.137614679
6 Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes (qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) 616 12.6% 0.125586137
7 Pre-university/college course that does not give credits 57 1.2% 0.011620795
8 Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical college) 176 3.6% 0.035881753
9 University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) 395 8.1% 0.080530071
10 Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist, etc.) 879 17.9% 0.179204893
11 Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) 320 6.5% 0.065239551
12 Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) 257 5.2% 0.052395515
13 Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian, engineer, architect, senior business economist) 461 9.4% 0.093985729
14 Research level (Ph.D.) 70 1.4% 0.014271152
15 None of these 120 2.4% 0.024464832
97 No answer 316 6.4% 0.064424057

w01_k27


Variable label: Marital status
Literal question: Marital status. Are/have you:
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Never been married 679 13.8% 0.1384301733
2 Married 2475 50.5% 0.5045871560
3 Legally registered partner 7 0.1% 0.0014271152
4 Cohabitant 836 17.0% 0.1704383282
5 Divorces/separated 305 6.2% 0.0621814475
6 Former cohabitant 124 2.5% 0.0252803262
7 Former legally registered partner 1 0.0% 0.0002038736
8 Widow/widower 95 1.9% 0.0193679918
9 Other 79 1.6% 0.0161060143
97 No answer 304 6.2% 0.0619775739

w01_k27_9_other


Variable label: Other: Marital status [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Marital status. Are/have you:
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k28


Variable label: Citizenship
Literal question: Citizenship. Are you:
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 4260 86.9% 0.86850153
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country 352 7.2% 0.07176351
97 No answer 293 6.0% 0.05973496

w01_k28_2_other


Variable label: Text: Citizenship in other country [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Please indicate which country
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k29


Variable label: Parents immigrated to Norway
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 4096 83.5% 0.835066259
2 I have immigrated to Norway myself 329 6.7% 0.067074414
3 Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway 32 0.7% 0.006523955
4 Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated 72 1.5% 0.014678899
5 Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated 70 1.4% 0.014271152
97 No answer 306 6.2% 0.062385321

w01_k30_1


Variable label: Text: Home country before immigration [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Which country did you live in before immigrating?
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k30_2_1


Variable label: Text: Parents home country, mother [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text: Which country did you parents live in (mother, father or both) before they immigrated?
Literal question: Mother:
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k30_2_2


Variable label: Text: Parents home country, father [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text: Which country did you parents live in (mother, father or both) before they immigrated?
Literal question: Father:
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k30_3_1


Variable label: Text: Mothers last home country [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Which country did your mother live in before she immigrated?
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_k30_4_1


Variable label: Text: Fathers last home country [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Which country did your father live in before he immigrated?
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_ran6


Variable label: Randomizes if U=1
Pre-question text: Randomizes if U=1 into two groups and selects one of the following questions: DT14 or DT15
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2349] [Invalid:2556] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1206 51.3% 0.51341
2 1143 48.7% 0.48659
Sysmiss 2556 NA

w01_dt14


Variable label: Who should get 5000 kr, the participants have no say
Literal question: One of the researchers linked to the Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 at his disposal. These funds will either be drawn as a travel gift card to one of the Citizen Panel’s participants, or they will be donated to the charitable organization Doctors Without Borders. The participants have no say on this decision, but it is nevertheless interesting to know your preference in how this money should be used. What do you prefer?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A NOK 5,000 gift card drawn as a prize for one of the Citizen Panel's participants 137 11.4% 0.11359867
2 A donation of NOK 5,000 given to the charitable organization Doctors Without Borders 964 79.9% 0.79933665
3 No opinion 89 7.4% 0.07379768
97 No answer 16 1.3% 0.01326700
98 Not asked 3699 NA

w01_dt15


Variable label: Who should get 5000 kr, you as a participant have a say
Literal question: One of the researchers linked to the Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 at his disposal. These funds will either be drawn as a gift card to one of the Citizen Panel’s participants, or they will be donated to the charitable organization Doctors Without Borders. You as a participant have a say in this decision, and it is therefore interesting to know your preference in how this money should be used. What do you prefer?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A NOK 5,000 gift card drawn as a prize for one of the Citizen Panel's participants 118 10.3% 0.103237095
2 A donation of NOK 5,000 given to the charitable organization Doctors Without Borders 950 83.1% 0.831146107
3 No opinion 69 6.0% 0.060367454
97 No answer 6 0.5% 0.005249344
98 Not asked 3762 NA

w01_km31


Variable label: Text: Thoughts on climate change [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text: Finally, a question on the climate.
Literal question: What do you think when you hear the words “climate change”? Please note the first thing that springs to mind. We appreciate all kinds of answers.
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_comment


Variable label: Text: Comments or suggestions for the survey [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: If you have any comments or suggestions for the survey and the Citizen Panel, please write them here.
Technical description: [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]


w01_P1


Variable label: Gender
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Male 2470 50.4% 0.5035678
2 Female 2435 49.6% 0.4964322

w01_P2


Variable label: Region
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Oslo/Akershus 1346 27.4% 0.27441386
2 Eastern Norway 1202 24.5% 0.24505607
3 Southern Norway 257 5.2% 0.05239551
4 Western Norway 1336 27.2% 0.27237513
5 Trøndelag 391 8.0% 0.07971458
6 Northern Norway 373 7.6% 0.07604485

w01_P3


Variable label: County
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Akershus 587 12.0% 0.11967380
2 Oslo 759 15.5% 0.15474006
3 Østfold 246 5.0% 0.05015291
4 Vestfold 229 4.7% 0.04668705
5 Hedmark 148 3.0% 0.03017329
6 Oppland 168 3.4% 0.03425076
7 Buskerud 261 5.3% 0.05321101
8 Telemark 150 3.1% 0.03058104
9 Vest-Agder 159 3.2% 0.03241590
10 Aust-Agder 98 2.0% 0.01997961
11 Rogaland 461 9.4% 0.09398573
12 Hordaland 574 11.7% 0.11702345
13 Sogn og Fjordane 90 1.8% 0.01834862
14 Møre og Romsdal 211 4.3% 0.04301733
15 Sør-Trøndelag 290 5.9% 0.05912334
16 Nord-Trøndelag 101 2.1% 0.02059123
17 Nordland 189 3.9% 0.03853211
18 Troms 134 2.7% 0.02731906
19 Finmark 50 1.0% 0.01019368

w01_P4


Variable label: Highest completed education
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No education/elementary school 505 10.3% 0.10295617
2 Upper secondary education 1582 32.3% 0.32252803
3 University/University college 2382 48.6% 0.48562691
97 No answer 436 8.9% 0.08888889

w01_P5_1


Variable label: Year of birth
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1939 or earlier 175 3.6% 0.03567788
2 1940-1949 676 13.8% 0.13781855
3 1950-1959 951 19.4% 0.19388379
4 1960-1969 1005 20.5% 0.20489297
5 1970-1979 867 17.7% 0.17675841
6 1980-1989 773 15.8% 0.15759429
7 1990 or later 458 9.3% 0.09337411

w01_P5_2


Variable label: Year of birth
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1959 or earlier 1802 36.7% 0.36738022
2 1960-1989 2645 53.9% 0.53924567
3 1990 or later 458 9.3% 0.09337411

w01_Weight1


Variable label: Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]


w01_Weight2


Variable label: Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation report
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-11]


w01_Weight4


Variable label: Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1) upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2 and x <= 5).
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]