Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg, Erla Løvseth, Sveinung Arnesen, Yvette Peters, Erik
Knudsen, Lise Bjånesøy, Susanne Bygnes, Endre Tvinnereim, Gisela Böhm,
Kristine Bærøe, Cornelius Cappelen, and Marta Eidheim
|
Scientific team, University of Bergen and UNI Research Rokkan Centre
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project Team Member
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality Assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in four
waves, wave 1, wave 3, wave 8 and wave 11. In wave 1, 4.870 panel
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4245
new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave 11,
2069 panel members were recruited.
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure
of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000
individuals. In wave 11, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people
was drawn.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
14 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the
register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c)
address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment.
Recruitment of new members to the panel was completed in several steps.
First, an invitation letter was sent to everyone in the sample. The
invitation letter contained the following information: a) description of
the project; b) current privacy and procedural privacy guidelines; c)
timeframe for the project; d) participants right to opt out of the
panel; e) contact information to the project mangers ; f) a unique login
code and URL for the Norwegian Citizens’ Panel’s website; g) estimated
time to complete the survey (15 minutes).
To maximize the recruitment rate, an incentive has been used in the form
of a travel gift card. The value of the travel gift card is 25,000 NOK.
To participate in the drawing of the gift card, it is required that the
e-mail address is provided. Information about the lottery is included in
all correspondence with the respondents.
The letter of invitation was mailed in on March 2, 2018.
Respondents were then reminded of the survey by text message or
postcard. Respondents with a registered phone number were initially
divided into two groups where one group received a reminder via text
message and the other group received the reminder by postcard. The
purpose here was to investigate which method had the greatest impact on
response rate. Respondents without a registered phone number, however,
only received the reminder by postcard.
The reminder went to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the
survey, or b) had not completed the survey. The post card was mailed in
on March 12, 2018. Reminder via text message was sent on March 15, 2018.
Respondents were invited to attend the Norwegian Citizens’ Panel with
reference to the letter of invitation. The login code was also given in
reminder cards, while in text message a direct link was given to the
survey.
Data collection among old panel members was done in parallel with the
recruitment of new respondents. Invitation mail was sent on March 7,
2018. First, second and third reminders was sent to the respondents’
e-mail, on 12th, 16th and 21st of March, 2018.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights,
the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender
and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in
the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register.
Information regarding the level of education is provided by the
respondents when answering the questionnaire. 3.3 percent of the net
sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different
weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 11
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r11_Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r11_Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r11_Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 11
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r11pktilfreds3
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r11pktilfreds4
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r11pktilfreds1
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-03-27
|
r11bk40_recode
|
Added variable based on r11k40.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-22
|
r11bk21_kodet
|
New variable based on r11bk21.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r11bk33_kodet
|
New variable based on r11bk33.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-20
|
r11bk27_kodet
|
New variable based on r11bk27.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-19
|
r11bk26_kodet
|
New variable based on r11bk26.
|
|
v-100
|
2018-04-17
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 11
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 11 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
8382
|
|
# Variables
|
109
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentn completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11u
|
Variable label:
|
[Thematical sub-group from wave 1-7 ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
In wave 11 this background variable is mainly used to decide who gets
MEME-questions. If u=4 the respondents gets r11meme20 and r11meme21.?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4065] [Invalid:4317]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
U1 |
1043 |
25.7% |
0.2565806 |
| 2 |
U2 |
1013 |
24.9% |
0.2492005 |
| 3 |
U3 |
993 |
24.4% |
0.2442804 |
| 4 |
U4 |
1016 |
25.0% |
0.2499385 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4317 |
|
NA |
r11v
|
Variable label:
|
[Thematical sub-group from wave 8 ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
If v=4 the respondent gets r11meme20 and r11meme21.?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6323] [Invalid:2059]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
v1 |
1658 |
26.2% |
0.2622173 |
| 2 |
v2 |
1610 |
25.5% |
0.2546260 |
| 3 |
v3 |
1506 |
23.8% |
0.2381781 |
| 4 |
v4 |
1549 |
24.5% |
0.2449786 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2059 |
|
NA |
r11rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
1913 |
22.8% |
0.2282272 |
| 2 |
Wave 3 |
2152 |
25.7% |
0.2567406 |
| 3 |
Wave 8 |
2258 |
26.9% |
0.2693868 |
| 4 |
Wave 11 |
2059 |
24.6% |
0.2456454 |
r11browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser type used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
other |
5893 |
70.3% |
0.7030542 |
| 1 |
mobile |
2489 |
29.7% |
0.2969458 |
r11opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC/Mac/Tablet |
6024 |
71.9% |
0.718682892 |
| 2 |
Touch (iPhone/iPod Touch/Android phones) |
2332 |
27.8% |
0.278215223 |
| 3 |
Generic |
26 |
0.3% |
0.003101885 |
r11advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11pk1
|
Variable label:
|
Interest in politics
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
1116 |
13.3% |
0.133142448 |
| 2 |
Interested |
4015 |
47.9% |
0.479002625 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
2533 |
30.2% |
0.302195180 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
615 |
7.3% |
0.073371510 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
88 |
1.0% |
0.010498688 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.2% |
0.001789549 |
r11km_livsstil_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Chooses r11km_livsstil_1 or r11km_livsstil_2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if rekruttert = 1 or rekruttert = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4065] [Invalid:4317]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gets r11km_livsstil_1 |
2019 |
49.7% |
0.496679 |
| 2 |
Gets r11km_livsstil_2 |
2046 |
50.3% |
0.503321 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4317 |
|
NA |
r11km_livsstil_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open text: Individuals must contribute to limiting climate change by
changing way of life [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To prevent or limit harmful climate change, it is argued from time to
time that we as individuals must contribute by changing our way of life.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to give us your opinion on this. All replies would be
welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you
would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r11km_livsstil_ran = 1. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11km_livsstil_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Individuals should help limit climate change by changing
way of life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To prevent or limit harmful climate change, it is argued from time to
time that we as individuals must contribute by changing our way of life.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r11km_livsstil_ran = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
1804 |
88.2% |
0.88172043 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
221 |
10.8% |
0.10801564 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.0% |
0.01026393 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6336 |
|
NA |
r11km_livsstil_2_txt
|
Variable label:
|
Open text: [r11km_livsstil_2] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like to ask you to state the reason for the answer you just
gave. All replies would be welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or
just a few words if you would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r11km_livsstil_ran = 2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11pk10
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of today’s economic situation in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? Do
you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
2154 |
25.7% |
0.2569792412 |
| 2 |
Good |
4766 |
56.9% |
0.5685993796 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
969 |
11.6% |
0.1156048676 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
299 |
3.6% |
0.0356716774 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
133 |
1.6% |
0.0158673348 |
| 6 |
Bad |
38 |
0.5% |
0.0045335242 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
16 |
0.2% |
0.0019088523 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.0008351229 |
r11pktilfreds3
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: the Norwegian government
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
595 |
7.1% |
0.070985445 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2817 |
33.6% |
0.336077309 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2574 |
30.7% |
0.307086614 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
1736 |
20.7% |
0.207110475 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
639 |
7.6% |
0.076234789 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.3% |
0.002505369 |
r11pktilfreds4
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: the way democracy works in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
1262 |
15.1% |
0.150560725 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
4514 |
53.9% |
0.538534956 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1886 |
22.5% |
0.225005965 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
564 |
6.7% |
0.067287044 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
102 |
1.2% |
0.012168933 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
0.6% |
0.006442377 |
r11pk9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open text: Most important political issue 1 [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the
most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11pk9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open text: Most important political issue 2 [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the
most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11pk9_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open text: Most important political issue 3 [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the
most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11pk8_1
|
Variable label:
|
Personal placement on political axis left-right
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right
wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are politically on
the far left, and 10 represents those who are politically on the far
right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left |
30 |
1.5% |
0.01457018 |
| 2 |
1 |
71 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
| 3 |
2 |
184 |
8.9% |
0.08936377 |
| 4 |
3 |
292 |
14.2% |
0.14181642 |
| 5 |
4 |
234 |
11.4% |
0.11364740 |
| 6 |
5 |
379 |
18.4% |
0.18406994 |
| 7 |
6 |
211 |
10.2% |
0.10247693 |
| 8 |
7 |
271 |
13.2% |
0.13161729 |
| 9 |
8 |
232 |
11.3% |
0.11267606 |
| 10 |
9 |
80 |
3.9% |
0.03885381 |
| 11 |
10 Right |
46 |
2.2% |
0.02234094 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01408451 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6323 |
|
NA |
r11bk3
|
Variable label:
|
Voted this party in parliamentary elections of 2017
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
64 |
3.1% |
0.03108305 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
469 |
22.8% |
0.22778048 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
193 |
9.4% |
0.09373482 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
108 |
5.2% |
0.05245265 |
| 5 |
The Soialist Left Party |
120 |
5.8% |
0.05828072 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
174 |
8.5% |
0.08450704 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
99 |
4.8% |
0.04808159 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
440 |
21.4% |
0.21369597 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
66 |
3.2% |
0.03205440 |
| 10 |
Did not vote |
103 |
5.0% |
0.05002428 |
| 11 |
Not entitled to vote |
156 |
7.6% |
0.07576493 |
| 12 |
Other: |
48 |
2.3% |
0.02331229 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.00922778 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6323 |
|
NA |
r11bk3_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: [r11bk3] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11pk204
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if parliamentary elections held tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
313 |
3.7% |
0.037341923 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2134 |
25.5% |
0.254593176 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
753 |
9.0% |
0.089835361 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
390 |
4.7% |
0.046528275 |
| 5 |
The Soialist Left Party |
792 |
9.4% |
0.094488189 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
846 |
10.1% |
0.100930565 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
349 |
4.2% |
0.041636841 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1607 |
19.2% |
0.191720353 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
407 |
4.9% |
0.048556430 |
| 10 |
Did not vote |
252 |
3.0% |
0.030064424 |
| 11 |
Not entitled to vote |
210 |
2.5% |
0.025053686 |
| 12 |
Other: |
264 |
3.1% |
0.031496063 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
65 |
0.8% |
0.007754712 |
r11pk204_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: [r11pk204] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11pk6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Christian Democrats
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
872 |
10.4% |
0.10403245 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1384 |
16.5% |
0.16511572 |
| 3 |
Dislike somwehat |
2044 |
24.4% |
0.24385588 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1975 |
23.6% |
0.23562396 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1426 |
17.0% |
0.17012646 |
| 6 |
Really like |
417 |
5.0% |
0.04974946 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
99 |
1.2% |
0.01181102 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
165 |
2.0% |
0.01968504 |
r11pk6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
341 |
4.1% |
0.04068241 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1026 |
12.2% |
0.12240515 |
| 3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1473 |
17.6% |
0.17573372 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
963 |
11.5% |
0.11488905 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1949 |
23.3% |
0.23252207 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1910 |
22.8% |
0.22786924 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
580 |
6.9% |
0.06919590 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
140 |
1.7% |
0.01670246 |
r11pk6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Progress Party
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2608 |
31.1% |
0.31114293 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1448 |
17.3% |
0.17275113 |
| 3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1082 |
12.9% |
0.12908614 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
732 |
8.7% |
0.08732999 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1289 |
15.4% |
0.15378191 |
| 6 |
Really like |
788 |
9.4% |
0.09401098 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
306 |
3.7% |
0.03650680 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
129 |
1.5% |
0.01539012 |
r11pk6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
748 |
8.9% |
0.08923885 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1232 |
14.7% |
0.14698163 |
| 3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1839 |
21.9% |
0.21939871 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2023 |
24.1% |
0.24135051 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1729 |
20.6% |
0.20627535 |
| 6 |
Really like |
539 |
6.4% |
0.06430446 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
95 |
1.1% |
0.01133381 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
177 |
2.1% |
0.02111668 |
r11pk6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Social Left Party
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1104 |
13.2% |
0.13171081 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1343 |
16.0% |
0.16022429 |
| 3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1401 |
16.7% |
0.16714388 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1456 |
17.4% |
0.17370556 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1537 |
18.3% |
0.18336912 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1040 |
12.4% |
0.12407540 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
326 |
3.9% |
0.03889287 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
175 |
2.1% |
0.02087807 |
r11pk6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Centre Party
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
446 |
5.3% |
0.05320926 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
855 |
10.2% |
0.10200429 |
| 3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1492 |
17.8% |
0.17800048 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2178 |
26.0% |
0.25984252 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2059 |
24.6% |
0.24564543 |
| 6 |
Really like |
919 |
11.0% |
0.10963970 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
264 |
3.1% |
0.03149606 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
169 |
2.0% |
0.02016225 |
r11pk6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Green Party
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1697 |
20.2% |
0.20245765 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1213 |
14.5% |
0.14471487 |
| 3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1365 |
16.3% |
0.16284896 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1365 |
16.3% |
0.16284896 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1653 |
19.7% |
0.19720830 |
| 6 |
Really like |
736 |
8.8% |
0.08780721 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
185 |
2.2% |
0.02207110 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
168 |
2.0% |
0.02004295 |
r11pk6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Labour Party
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
487 |
5.8% |
0.05810069 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
857 |
10.2% |
0.10224290 |
| 3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1477 |
17.6% |
0.17621093 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1298 |
15.5% |
0.15485564 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2294 |
27.4% |
0.27368170 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1481 |
17.7% |
0.17668814 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
352 |
4.2% |
0.04199475 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
136 |
1.6% |
0.01622524 |
r11pk6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Red Party
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1802 |
21.5% |
0.21498449 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1355 |
16.2% |
0.16165593 |
| 3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1179 |
14.1% |
0.14065855 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1617 |
19.3% |
0.19291339 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1321 |
15.8% |
0.15759962 |
| 6 |
Really like |
650 |
7.8% |
0.07754712 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
249 |
3.0% |
0.02970651 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
209 |
2.5% |
0.02493438 |
r11pktilfreds1
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: Life in general
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
2860 |
34.1% |
0.341207349 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
4522 |
53.9% |
0.539489382 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
794 |
9.5% |
0.094726796 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
139 |
1.7% |
0.016583154 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
35 |
0.4% |
0.004175614 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.4% |
0.003817705 |
r11pk15_1
|
Variable label:
|
Other people’s trustworthiness
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
86 |
1.0% |
0.010260081 |
| 1 |
1 |
67 |
0.8% |
0.007993319 |
| 2 |
2 |
146 |
1.7% |
0.017418277 |
| 3 |
3 |
295 |
3.5% |
0.035194464 |
| 4 |
4 |
348 |
4.2% |
0.041517538 |
| 5 |
5 |
775 |
9.2% |
0.092460033 |
| 6 |
6 |
865 |
10.3% |
0.103197328 |
| 7 |
7 |
1928 |
23.0% |
0.230016702 |
| 8 |
8 |
2102 |
25.1% |
0.250775471 |
| 9 |
9 |
973 |
11.6% |
0.116082081 |
| 10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
772 |
9.2% |
0.092102124 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.3% |
0.002982582 |
r11bktivi_1
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her]
parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be
obedient.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
215 |
2.6% |
0.02565020 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
629 |
7.5% |
0.07504176 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1413 |
16.9% |
0.16857552 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
3053 |
36.4% |
0.36423288 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2134 |
25.5% |
0.25459318 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
813 |
9.7% |
0.09699356 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
125 |
1.5% |
0.01491291 |
r11bktivi_2
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do
what [his/her] religion requires.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
4034 |
48.1% |
0.48126939 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1716 |
20.5% |
0.20472441 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1149 |
13.7% |
0.13707946 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
816 |
9.7% |
0.09735147 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
379 |
4.5% |
0.04521594 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
182 |
2.2% |
0.02171319 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
106 |
1.3% |
0.01264615 |
r11bktivi_3
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her].
[He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
27 |
0.3% |
0.003221188 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
102 |
1.2% |
0.012168933 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
509 |
6.1% |
0.060725364 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2996 |
35.7% |
0.357432594 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
3089 |
36.9% |
0.368527798 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1550 |
18.5% |
0.184920067 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
109 |
1.3% |
0.013004056 |
r11bktivi_4
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated
equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in
life.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
69 |
0.8% |
0.008231926 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
214 |
2.6% |
0.025530900 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
547 |
6.5% |
0.065258888 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2333 |
27.8% |
0.278334526 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
3042 |
36.3% |
0.362920544 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
2067 |
24.7% |
0.246599857 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
110 |
1.3% |
0.013123360 |
r11bktivi_5
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand
things
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She]
likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
45 |
0.5% |
0.005368647 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
170 |
2.0% |
0.020281556 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
719 |
8.6% |
0.085779050 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2922 |
34.9% |
0.348604152 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2872 |
34.3% |
0.342638988 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1547 |
18.5% |
0.184562157 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
107 |
1.3% |
0.012765450 |
r11bktivi_6
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new
experiences.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
765 |
9.1% |
0.09126700 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1745 |
20.8% |
0.20818420 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
2788 |
33.3% |
0.33261751 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2118 |
25.3% |
0.25268432 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
677 |
8.1% |
0.08076831 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
182 |
2.2% |
0.02171319 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
107 |
1.3% |
0.01276545 |
r11bktivi_7
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for
[him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
303 |
3.6% |
0.03614889 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
954 |
11.4% |
0.11381532 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
2330 |
27.8% |
0.27797662 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
3190 |
38.1% |
0.38057743 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1153 |
13.8% |
0.13755667 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
339 |
4.0% |
0.04044381 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
113 |
1.3% |
0.01348127 |
r11bktivi_8
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress
other people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
877 |
10.5% |
0.10462897 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1732 |
20.7% |
0.20663326 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
2629 |
31.4% |
0.31364829 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2100 |
25.1% |
0.25053686 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
715 |
8.5% |
0.08530184 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
216 |
2.6% |
0.02576951 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
113 |
1.3% |
0.01348127 |
r11bktivi_9
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to
do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
924 |
11.0% |
0.11023622 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1722 |
20.5% |
0.20544023 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
2661 |
31.7% |
0.31746600 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2249 |
26.8% |
0.26831305 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
595 |
7.1% |
0.07098545 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
120 |
1.4% |
0.01431639 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
111 |
1.3% |
0.01324266 |
r11bktivi_10
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She]
really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
127 |
1.5% |
0.01515152 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
452 |
5.4% |
0.05392508 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1170 |
14.0% |
0.13958482 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2841 |
33.9% |
0.33894059 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2401 |
28.6% |
0.28644715 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1289 |
15.4% |
0.15378191 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
102 |
1.2% |
0.01216893 |
r11pk53
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in Norwegian politicians
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
97 |
1.2% |
0.011572417 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
2228 |
26.6% |
0.265807683 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
4532 |
54.1% |
0.540682415 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
1268 |
15.1% |
0.151276545 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
189 |
2.3% |
0.022548318 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
68 |
0.8% |
0.008112622 |
r11pk54
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in Norwegian news media
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, what degree of confidence do you have in the
Norwegian news media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
246 |
2.9% |
0.02934860 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
2976 |
35.5% |
0.35504653 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
3947 |
47.1% |
0.47089000 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
902 |
10.8% |
0.10761155 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
204 |
2.4% |
0.02433787 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
107 |
1.3% |
0.01276545 |
r11pk12
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in Norwegian parliament
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
312 |
3.7% |
0.03722262 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
3329 |
39.7% |
0.39716058 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
3702 |
44.2% |
0.44166070 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
788 |
9.4% |
0.09401098 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
157 |
1.9% |
0.01873061 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
94 |
1.1% |
0.01121451 |
r11pk55
|
Variable label:
|
The number of municipalities should be reduced further by merging
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
From the year 2020, Norway will have 356 municipalities instead of 422
as of today. The number of municipalities should be reduced further by
more mergers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
909 |
10.8% |
0.108446671 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1421 |
17.0% |
0.169529945 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1519 |
18.1% |
0.181221665 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1546 |
18.4% |
0.184442854 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1012 |
12.1% |
0.120734908 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1114 |
13.3% |
0.132903842 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
779 |
9.3% |
0.092937246 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
82 |
1.0% |
0.009782868 |
r11pk60
|
Variable label:
|
The government should work towards recuding income differences
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income
differences in society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2207 |
26.3% |
0.263302314 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2660 |
31.7% |
0.317346695 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1913 |
22.8% |
0.228227153 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
692 |
8.3% |
0.082557862 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
489 |
5.8% |
0.058339298 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
250 |
3.0% |
0.029825817 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
73 |
0.9% |
0.008709139 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
98 |
1.2% |
0.011691720 |
r11pkby3
|
Variable label:
|
Fears new terrorist attack in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
554 |
6.6% |
0.066094011 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
3245 |
38.7% |
0.387139108 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
3237 |
38.6% |
0.386184681 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
1004 |
12.0% |
0.119780482 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
260 |
3.1% |
0.031018850 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
82 |
1.0% |
0.009782868 |
r11pk52
|
Variable label:
|
Government should protect citizens from terrorism even at expense of
privacy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from
potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of
privacy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
710 |
8.5% |
0.084705321 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1749 |
20.9% |
0.208661417 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2314 |
27.6% |
0.276067764 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1040 |
12.4% |
0.124075400 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1085 |
12.9% |
0.129444047 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
935 |
11.2% |
0.111548556 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
466 |
5.6% |
0.055595323 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
1.0% |
0.009902171 |
r11pkkm2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Chooses variation of question r11pkkm2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes all respondents ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8320] [Invalid:62]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gets r11pkkm2_1 |
2100 |
25.2% |
0.2524038 |
| 2 |
Gets r11pkkm2_2 |
2098 |
25.2% |
0.2521635 |
| 3 |
Gets r11pkkm2_3 |
2052 |
24.7% |
0.2466346 |
| 4 |
Gets r11pkkm2_4 |
2070 |
24.9% |
0.2487981 |
| Sysmiss |
|
62 |
|
NA |
r11pkkm2_1
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change: Variant 1
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3,
and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran =1.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all concerned |
100 |
4.8% |
0.047619048 |
| 2 |
Not particularly concerned |
394 |
18.8% |
0.187619048 |
| 3 |
Somewhat concerned |
652 |
31.0% |
0.310476190 |
| 4 |
Concerned |
663 |
31.6% |
0.315714286 |
| 5 |
Very concerned |
286 |
13.6% |
0.136190476 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002380952 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6282 |
|
NA |
r11pkkm2_2
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change: Variant 2
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3,
and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran = 2.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all concerned |
98 |
4.7% |
0.0467111535 |
| 2 |
Not very concerned |
444 |
21.2% |
0.2116301239 |
| 3 |
Slightly concerned |
860 |
41.0% |
0.4099142040 |
| 4 |
Very concerned |
609 |
29.0% |
0.2902764538 |
| 5 |
Extremely concerned |
85 |
4.1% |
0.0405147760 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009532888 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6284 |
|
NA |
r11pkkm2_3
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change: Variant 3
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3,
and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran = 3.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all concerned |
92 |
4.5% |
0.044834308 |
| 2 |
Not particularly concerned |
358 |
17.4% |
0.174463938 |
| 3 |
Slightly concerned |
897 |
43.7% |
0.437134503 |
| 4 |
Very concerned |
631 |
30.8% |
0.307504873 |
| 5 |
Extremely concerned |
69 |
3.4% |
0.033625731 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002436647 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6330 |
|
NA |
r11pkkm2_4
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change: Variant 4
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3,
and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran = 4.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all concerned |
95 |
4.6% |
0.045893720 |
| 2 |
Not particularly concerned |
321 |
15.5% |
0.155072464 |
| 3 |
Slightly concerned |
825 |
39.9% |
0.398550725 |
| 4 |
Rather concerned |
585 |
28.3% |
0.282608696 |
| 5 |
Very concerned |
241 |
11.6% |
0.116425121 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001449275 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6312 |
|
NA |
r11pkkm42
|
Variable label:
|
Should/should not be possible to buy diesel- and petrol cars after 2025
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private
vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from
2025.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Link: Look at “Nasjonal Transportplan 2018-2029”, p. 16, available here
(external link)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles sold should either be electric or run on
hydrogen |
3536 |
42.2% |
0.42185636 |
| 2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol |
4667 |
55.7% |
0.55678836 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
179 |
2.1% |
0.02135529 |
r11pkkm4
|
Variable label:
|
Should/should not allow oil and gas extraction in Lofoten, Vesterålen
and Senja
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen
and Senja areas. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2580 |
30.8% |
0.30780243 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1425 |
17.0% |
0.17000716 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1002 |
12.0% |
0.11954188 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1267 |
15.1% |
0.15115724 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
784 |
9.4% |
0.09353376 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
744 |
8.9% |
0.08876163 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
475 |
5.7% |
0.05666905 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
105 |
1.3% |
0.01252684 |
r11pkmeme9
|
Variable label:
|
Access to asylum in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and
their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is
today, do you mean it should be:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much easier |
230 |
2.7% |
0.02743975 |
| 2 |
Easier |
856 |
10.2% |
0.10212360 |
| 3 |
Somewhat easier |
1624 |
19.4% |
0.19374851 |
| 4 |
Same as today |
2807 |
33.5% |
0.33488428 |
| 5 |
Slightly more difficult |
1214 |
14.5% |
0.14483417 |
| 6 |
More difficult |
827 |
9.9% |
0.09866380 |
| 7 |
Much more difficult |
706 |
8.4% |
0.08422811 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
118 |
1.4% |
0.01407779 |
r11pkdv5
|
Variable label:
|
How good or bad that immigrants come to live in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very great advantage |
221 |
2.6% |
0.02636602 |
| 2 |
Great advantage |
1111 |
13.3% |
0.13254593 |
| 3 |
Slightly advantageous |
2867 |
34.2% |
0.34204247 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1532 |
18.3% |
0.18277261 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1635 |
19.5% |
0.19506084 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
580 |
6.9% |
0.06919590 |
| 7 |
Very great disadvantage |
324 |
3.9% |
0.03865426 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
112 |
1.3% |
0.01336197 |
r11pkdv55
|
Variable label:
|
Muslim religious schools should be possible
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian
schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the
Christian faith.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents
to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national
curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
214 |
2.6% |
0.02553090 |
| 2 |
Agree |
751 |
9.0% |
0.08959675 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
993 |
11.8% |
0.11846815 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1414 |
16.9% |
0.16869482 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1100 |
13.1% |
0.13123360 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1696 |
20.2% |
0.20233834 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
2099 |
25.0% |
0.25041756 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
115 |
1.4% |
0.01371988 |
r11pkby2
|
Variable label:
|
Safety in local environment past few years
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past
couple of years.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much safer |
93 |
1.1% |
0.01109520 |
| 2 |
Somewhat safer |
447 |
5.3% |
0.05332856 |
| 3 |
No change in safety |
5846 |
69.7% |
0.69744691 |
| 4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
1634 |
19.5% |
0.19494154 |
| 5 |
Much more unsafe |
256 |
3.1% |
0.03054164 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
106 |
1.3% |
0.01264615 |
r11guns
|
Variable label:
|
Norwegian police should be armed
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norwegian police should be
armed?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert =1 eller 2, and if v or u = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
303 |
13.2% |
0.13168188 |
| 2 |
Agree |
451 |
19.6% |
0.19600174 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
569 |
24.7% |
0.24728379 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
177 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
240 |
10.4% |
0.10430248 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
312 |
13.6% |
0.13559322 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
222 |
9.6% |
0.09647979 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.2% |
0.01173403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6081 |
|
NA |
r11meme20_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Text substitution R11MEME20: mother of infant/father of an infant]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u =4 eller v = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2316] [Invalid:6066]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gets "mother of infant" |
1135 |
49.0% |
0.4900691 |
| 2 |
Gets "father of infant" |
1181 |
51.0% |
0.5099309 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6066 |
|
NA |
r11meme20
|
Variable label:
|
Possible to be [mother/father] of infant and get ahead in working life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In Norway today it is practically possible to be a good [mother of
infant/father of an infant] and at the same time get ahead in working
life.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u =4 eller v = 4. Question wording depends on the randomized
value of r11meme20_ran]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
237 |
10.1% |
0.101412067 |
| 2 |
Agree |
987 |
42.2% |
0.422336329 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
543 |
23.2% |
0.232349166 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
221 |
9.5% |
0.094565682 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
210 |
9.0% |
0.089858793 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
89 |
3.8% |
0.038083012 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
22 |
0.9% |
0.009413778 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.011981172 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6045 |
|
NA |
r11meme21
|
Variable label:
|
It is women’s responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own
responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u =4 eller v = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
43 |
1.8% |
0.01839966 |
| 2 |
Agree |
90 |
3.9% |
0.03851091 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
396 |
16.9% |
0.16944801 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
258 |
11.0% |
0.11039795 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
320 |
13.7% |
0.13692769 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
657 |
28.1% |
0.28112965 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
543 |
23.2% |
0.23234917 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01283697 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6045 |
|
NA |
r11pkklasse
|
Variable label:
|
Social class, self-placement
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups
or classes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it
be?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lower class |
77 |
0.9% |
0.009186352 |
| 2 |
Working class |
1144 |
13.6% |
0.136482940 |
| 3 |
Lower middle class |
806 |
9.6% |
0.096158435 |
| 4 |
Middle class |
4405 |
52.6% |
0.525530900 |
| 5 |
Upper middle class |
1525 |
18.2% |
0.181937485 |
| 6 |
Upper class |
47 |
0.6% |
0.005607254 |
| 7 |
Don't know |
269 |
3.2% |
0.032092579 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
109 |
1.3% |
0.013004056 |
r11bk33
|
Variable label:
|
Employment situation
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Paid work (or temporarily absent) |
4721 |
56.3% |
0.563230733 |
| 2 |
Studying (not paid for by an employer) |
466 |
5.6% |
0.055595323 |
| 3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
114 |
1.4% |
0.013600573 |
| 4 |
Unemployed, wanting a job, but not actively seeking work |
43 |
0.5% |
0.005130041 |
| 5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
320 |
3.8% |
0.038177046 |
| 6 |
Retired |
2066 |
24.6% |
0.246480554 |
| 7 |
Military service |
12 |
0.1% |
0.001431639 |
| 8 |
At home, looking after children or others |
89 |
1.1% |
0.010617991 |
| 9 |
Other: |
448 |
5.3% |
0.053447864 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
103 |
1.2% |
0.012288237 |
r11bk33_9_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: [r11bk33] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11bk33_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Employment situation [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[This variable contains the values of r11bk33 plus coded values of
r11bk33_9_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Paid work (or temporarily absent) |
4849 |
57.9% |
0.578501551 |
| 2 |
Studying (not paid for by an employer) |
483 |
5.8% |
0.057623479 |
| 3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
116 |
1.4% |
0.013839179 |
| 4 |
Unemployed, wanting a job, but not actively seeking work |
45 |
0.5% |
0.005368647 |
| 5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
354 |
4.2% |
0.042233357 |
| 6 |
Retired |
2081 |
24.8% |
0.248270103 |
| 7 |
Military service |
12 |
0.1% |
0.001431639 |
| 8 |
At home, looking after children or others |
92 |
1.1% |
0.010975901 |
| 9 |
Other: |
247 |
2.9% |
0.029467907 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
103 |
1.2% |
0.012288237 |
r11bk21
|
Variable label:
|
Works in what type of business
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r11bk33 = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
534 |
11.3% |
0.1131116289 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1425 |
30.2% |
0.3018428299 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
295 |
6.2% |
0.0624867613 |
| 4 |
Private business |
2111 |
44.7% |
0.4471510273 |
| 5 |
Self employed |
241 |
5.1% |
0.0510485067 |
| 6 |
Other: |
112 |
2.4% |
0.0237237873 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0006354586 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3661 |
|
NA |
r11bk21_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: [r11bk21] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r11bk33 = 1. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11bk21_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Works in what type of business [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r11bk33 = 1. ]
[This variable contains the values of r11bk21 plus coded values of
11bk21_6_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
535 |
11.3% |
0.1133234484 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1428 |
30.2% |
0.3024782885 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
296 |
6.3% |
0.0626985808 |
| 4 |
Private business |
2114 |
44.8% |
0.4477864859 |
| 5 |
Self employed |
241 |
5.1% |
0.0510485067 |
| 6 |
Other: |
104 |
2.2% |
0.0220292311 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0006354586 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3661 |
|
NA |
r11bk26
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
33 |
0.4% |
0.003937008 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
587 |
7.0% |
0.070031019 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
968 |
11.5% |
0.115485564 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1019 |
12.2% |
0.121570031 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
449 |
5.4% |
0.053567168 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
765 |
9.1% |
0.091267001 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
1709 |
20.4% |
0.203889287 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
617 |
7.4% |
0.073610117 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
529 |
6.3% |
0.063111429 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economy) |
1188 |
14.2% |
0.141732283 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
167 |
2.0% |
0.019923646 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
229 |
2.7% |
0.027320449 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
122 |
1.5% |
0.014554999 |
r11bk26_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: [r11bk26] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11bk26_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[This variable contains the values of r11bk26 plus coded values of
11bk26_12_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
34 |
0.4% |
0.004056311 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
618 |
7.4% |
0.073729420 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
1004 |
12.0% |
0.119780482 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1064 |
12.7% |
0.126938678 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
481 |
5.7% |
0.057384872 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
769 |
9.2% |
0.091744214 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
1717 |
20.5% |
0.204843713 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
625 |
7.5% |
0.074564543 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
532 |
6.3% |
0.063469339 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economy) |
1193 |
14.2% |
0.142328800 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
167 |
2.0% |
0.019923646 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
56 |
0.7% |
0.006680983 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
122 |
1.5% |
0.014554999 |
r11bk27
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the one that is most relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Unmarried/not cohabiting |
1280 |
15.3% |
0.152708184 |
| 2 |
Cohabitant |
1509 |
18.0% |
0.180028633 |
| 3 |
Married/legally registered partner |
4566 |
54.5% |
0.544738726 |
| 4 |
Divorced/separated/formally registered partner |
623 |
7.4% |
0.074325937 |
| 5 |
Widow/widower |
238 |
2.8% |
0.028394178 |
| 6 |
Other: |
68 |
0.8% |
0.008112622 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
98 |
1.2% |
0.011691720 |
r11bk27_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: [r11bk27] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the one that is most relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11bk27_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the one that is most relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[This variable contains the values of r11bk27 plus coded values of
r11bk27_6_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Unmarried/not cohabiting |
1331 |
15.9% |
0.158792651 |
| 2 |
Cohabitant |
1509 |
18.0% |
0.180028633 |
| 3 |
Married/legally registered partner |
4568 |
54.5% |
0.544977332 |
| 4 |
Divorced/separated/formally registered partner |
623 |
7.4% |
0.074325937 |
| 5 |
Widow/widower |
238 |
2.8% |
0.028394178 |
| 6 |
Other: |
15 |
0.2% |
0.001789549 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
98 |
1.2% |
0.011691720 |
r11bk25
|
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
< 150 000 |
626 |
7.5% |
0.07468385 |
| 2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
1086 |
13.0% |
0.12956335 |
| 3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
1269 |
15.1% |
0.15139585 |
| 4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1538 |
18.3% |
0.18348843 |
| 5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
1392 |
16.6% |
0.16607015 |
| 6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
866 |
10.3% |
0.10331663 |
| 7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
916 |
10.9% |
0.10928179 |
| 8 |
> 1 000 000 |
435 |
5.2% |
0.05189692 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
254 |
3.0% |
0.03030303 |
r11bk35
|
Variable label:
|
Type of living area
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
1918 |
22.9% |
0.22882367 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
1739 |
20.7% |
0.20746838 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
2305 |
27.5% |
0.27499403 |
| 4 |
A village |
1408 |
16.8% |
0.16797900 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
908 |
10.8% |
0.10832737 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
104 |
1.2% |
0.01240754 |
r11bkhelse
|
Variable label:
|
General health
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
1179 |
14.1% |
0.14065855 |
| 2 |
Very good |
3039 |
36.3% |
0.36256263 |
| 3 |
Good |
2725 |
32.5% |
0.32510141 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
1015 |
12.1% |
0.12109282 |
| 5 |
Poor |
313 |
3.7% |
0.03734192 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
111 |
1.3% |
0.01324266 |
r11bk28
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1841 |
89.4% |
0.89412336 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
181 |
8.8% |
0.08790675 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
1.8% |
0.01796989 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6323 |
|
NA |
r11bk28_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: [r11bk28] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11bk29
|
Variable label:
|
Immigration background
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 3 or rekruttert = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
3786 |
87.7% |
0.876997915 |
| 2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
314 |
7.3% |
0.072735696 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
31 |
0.7% |
0.007180913 |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
72 |
1.7% |
0.016678249 |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
55 |
1.3% |
0.012740329 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
1.4% |
0.013666898 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4065 |
|
NA |
r11bk30
|
Variable label:
|
Open text: Country of origin [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did you live in before you immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r11bk29 = 2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11bk30_1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open text: Country of origin: both parents, mother [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both) live in before
they immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r11bk29 = 3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11bk30_1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open text: Country of origin: both parents, father [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both) live in before
they immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r11bk29 = 3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11bk30_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open text: Country of origin: mother [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your mother live before she immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r11bk29 = 4. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11bk30_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open text: Country of origin: father [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your father live before he immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r11bk29 = 5. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r11bk42
|
Variable label:
|
How many children under 16 living at home
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in
that case how many?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
6387 |
76.2% |
0.7619899785 |
| 2 |
1 |
824 |
9.8% |
0.0983058936 |
| 3 |
2 |
800 |
9.5% |
0.0954426151 |
| 4 |
3 |
219 |
2.6% |
0.0261274159 |
| 5 |
4 |
26 |
0.3% |
0.0031018850 |
| 6 |
5 |
6 |
0.1% |
0.0007158196 |
| 7 |
6 or more |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0005965163 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
115 |
1.4% |
0.0137198759 |
r11bk40
|
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:8382]
[Range:-]
|
r11bk40_recode
|
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Recoded from source variable r11bk40]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
5296 |
63.2% |
0.631830112 |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
129 |
1.5% |
0.015390122 |
| 3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
323 |
3.9% |
0.038534956 |
| 4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
68 |
0.8% |
0.008112622 |
| 5 |
Islam |
76 |
0.9% |
0.009067048 |
| 6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
2374 |
28.3% |
0.283225960 |
| 97 |
No answer |
116 |
1.4% |
0.013839179 |
r11bk41
|
Variable label:
|
Attends religious meetings
|
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often
would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
13 |
0.2% |
0.001550942 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
124 |
1.5% |
0.014793605 |
| 3 |
Once a week |
226 |
2.7% |
0.026962539 |
| 4 |
At least once a month |
391 |
4.7% |
0.046647578 |
| 5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
1465 |
17.5% |
0.174779289 |
| 6 |
Less frequently |
1851 |
22.1% |
0.220830351 |
| 7 |
Never |
4198 |
50.1% |
0.500835123 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
114 |
1.4% |
0.013600573 |
r11P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
4181 |
49.9% |
0.498807 |
| 2 |
Female |
4201 |
50.1% |
0.501193 |
r11P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
2398 |
28.6% |
0.28608924 |
| 2 |
Eastern Norway |
1980 |
23.6% |
0.23622047 |
| 3 |
Southern Norway |
406 |
4.8% |
0.04843713 |
| 4 |
Western Norway |
2209 |
26.4% |
0.26354092 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
735 |
8.8% |
0.08768790 |
| 6 |
Northern Norway |
654 |
7.8% |
0.07802434 |
r11P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-18]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus |
1075 |
12.8% |
0.128251014 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
1323 |
15.8% |
0.157838225 |
| 3 |
Østfold |
427 |
5.1% |
0.050942496 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
391 |
4.7% |
0.046647578 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
242 |
2.9% |
0.028871391 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
237 |
2.8% |
0.028274875 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
438 |
5.2% |
0.052254832 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
245 |
2.9% |
0.029229301 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
252 |
3.0% |
0.030064424 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
154 |
1.8% |
0.018372703 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
736 |
8.8% |
0.087807206 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
980 |
11.7% |
0.116917204 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
147 |
1.8% |
0.017537581 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
346 |
4.1% |
0.041278931 |
| 15 |
Trøndelag |
735 |
8.8% |
0.087687903 |
| 16 |
Nordland |
320 |
3.8% |
0.038177046 |
| 17 |
Troms |
252 |
3.0% |
0.030064424 |
| 18 |
Finmark |
82 |
1.0% |
0.009782868 |
r11P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
634 |
7.6% |
0.07563827 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
2465 |
29.4% |
0.29408256 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
5004 |
59.7% |
0.59699356 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
279 |
3.3% |
0.03328561 |
r11P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
35 |
0.4% |
0.004175614 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
599 |
7.1% |
0.071462658 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
984 |
11.7% |
0.117394417 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1029 |
12.3% |
0.122763064 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
452 |
5.4% |
0.053925078 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
770 |
9.2% |
0.091863517 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
1719 |
20.5% |
0.205082319 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
619 |
7.4% |
0.073848723 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
531 |
6.3% |
0.063350036 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1194 |
14.2% |
0.142448103 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
171 |
2.0% |
0.020400859 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
233 |
2.8% |
0.027797662 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
0.5% |
0.005487950 |
r11P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
258 |
3.1% |
0.03078024 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
1394 |
16.6% |
0.16630876 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
1927 |
23.0% |
0.22989740 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
1746 |
20.8% |
0.20830351 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
1292 |
15.4% |
0.15413982 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
1011 |
12.1% |
0.12061560 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
754 |
9.0% |
0.08995466 |
r11P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
3579 |
42.7% |
0.42698640 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
4049 |
48.3% |
0.48305894 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
754 |
9.0% |
0.08995466 |
r11_Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]
|
r11_Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-19]
|
r11_Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8382] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-3]
|
