Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
Coordinator, UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Sveinung Arnesen
|
NORCE
|
|
Susanne Bygnes
|
UiB
|
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
NORCE
|
|
Yvette Peters
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project Team Member
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality Assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in four
waves, wave 1, wave 3, wave 8 and wave 11. In wave 1, 4.870 panel
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4245
new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave 11,
2069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure
of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000
individuals. In wave 11, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people
was drawn.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
In wave 11, the list from the Norwegian Tax Administration consisted of
the following data: a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender,
e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current
home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment. Please refer to the Documentation Report from Wave 11. The
report is available here:
http://digsscore.uib.no/download-data-and-documentation
In wave 13, emails were sent out on October 17th, 2018.
E-mail with reminder was sent out three times, October 23rd, October
29th and November 2nd, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not
logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel
members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via
text message. Panel members without registered phone number were
reminded by e-mail.
Wave 13 ended November 5th.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights,
the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender
and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in
the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register.
Information regarding the level of education is provided by the
respondents when answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 13
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-01
|
r13Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r13Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-01
|
r13Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-03-15
|
r13pad5_sak
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 13
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
r13meme10c_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
r13meme10c_2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
r13meme10c_3
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r13polkom14a
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r13polkom15a
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-03-26
|
r13km1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-31
|
r13polkom2
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13pad10b_2_other
|
Added
data
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13pad10d_2_other
|
Added
data
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13km_kopris_open
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13polkom1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13kmmoral_open
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2018-12-06
|
r13pad10d
|
Updated norwegian value label.
|
|
NA
|
2018-12-06
|
r13pad10d_2_other
|
Updated norwegian value label.
|
|
v-100
|
2018-12-03
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 13
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 13 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
7209
|
|
# Variables
|
248
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentn completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave1 |
1808 |
25.1% |
0.2507976 |
| 3 |
Wave3 |
2000 |
27.7% |
0.2774310 |
| 8 |
Wave8 |
2061 |
28.6% |
0.2858926 |
| 11 |
Wave11 |
1340 |
18.6% |
0.1858788 |
r13browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
annet |
4546 |
63.1% |
0.6306006 |
| 1 |
mobil |
2663 |
36.9% |
0.3693994 |
r13opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
4659 |
64.6% |
0.646275489 |
| 2 |
Touch |
2535 |
35.2% |
0.351643779 |
| 3 |
Generisk |
15 |
0.2% |
0.002080732 |
r13advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13group
|
Variable label:
|
[Subgroup in wave 13. Randomized. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Subgroup in wave 12. Randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
g1 |
1454 |
20.2% |
0.2016923 |
| 2 |
g2 |
1482 |
20.6% |
0.2055764 |
| 3 |
g3 |
1496 |
20.8% |
0.2075184 |
| 4 |
g4 |
1407 |
19.5% |
0.1951727 |
| 5 |
g5 |
1370 |
19.0% |
0.1900402 |
r13pk6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Christian Democratic Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
848 |
11.8% |
0.117630739 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1184 |
16.4% |
0.164239146 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1740 |
24.1% |
0.241364960 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1496 |
20.8% |
0.207518380 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1372 |
19.0% |
0.190317658 |
| 6 |
Really like |
388 |
5.4% |
0.053821612 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
114 |
1.6% |
0.015813566 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.9% |
0.009293938 |
r13pk6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Conservative Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
258 |
3.6% |
0.035788598 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
925 |
12.8% |
0.128311832 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1309 |
18.2% |
0.181578582 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
877 |
12.2% |
0.121653489 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1719 |
23.8% |
0.238451935 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1596 |
22.1% |
0.221389929 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
469 |
6.5% |
0.065057567 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
0.8% |
0.007768068 |
r13pk6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Progress Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2136 |
29.6% |
0.296296296 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1440 |
20.0% |
0.199750312 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
967 |
13.4% |
0.134137883 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
592 |
8.2% |
0.082119573 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1122 |
15.6% |
0.155638785 |
| 6 |
Really like |
680 |
9.4% |
0.094326536 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
209 |
2.9% |
0.028991538 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
0.9% |
0.008739076 |
r13pk6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Liberal Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
466 |
6.5% |
0.06464142 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
939 |
13.0% |
0.13025385 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1588 |
22.0% |
0.22028021 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1910 |
26.5% |
0.26494659 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1702 |
23.6% |
0.23609377 |
| 6 |
Really like |
455 |
6.3% |
0.06311555 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
71 |
1.0% |
0.00984880 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
78 |
1.1% |
0.01081981 |
r13pk6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Socialist Left Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
898 |
12.5% |
0.12456651 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1193 |
16.5% |
0.16548758 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1238 |
17.2% |
0.17172978 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1230 |
17.1% |
0.17062006 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1414 |
19.6% |
0.19614371 |
| 6 |
Really like |
898 |
12.5% |
0.12456651 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
264 |
3.7% |
0.03662089 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
1.0% |
0.01026495 |
r13pk6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Centre Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
321 |
4.5% |
0.04452767 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
678 |
9.4% |
0.09404911 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1341 |
18.6% |
0.18601748 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2011 |
27.9% |
0.27895686 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1827 |
25.3% |
0.25343321 |
| 6 |
Really like |
762 |
10.6% |
0.10570121 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
184 |
2.6% |
0.02552365 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
85 |
1.2% |
0.01179082 |
r13pk6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Green Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1207 |
16.7% |
0.167429602 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1140 |
15.8% |
0.158135664 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1261 |
17.5% |
0.174920239 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1183 |
16.4% |
0.164100430 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1569 |
21.8% |
0.217644611 |
| 6 |
Really like |
617 |
8.6% |
0.085587460 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
160 |
2.2% |
0.022194479 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
1.0% |
0.009987516 |
r13pk6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Labour Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
294 |
4.1% |
0.040782355 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
666 |
9.2% |
0.092384519 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1221 |
16.9% |
0.169371619 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
998 |
13.8% |
0.138438064 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2173 |
30.1% |
0.301428770 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1481 |
20.5% |
0.205437647 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
310 |
4.3% |
0.043001803 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
66 |
0.9% |
0.009155223 |
r13pk6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Red Party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1475 |
20.5% |
0.20460535 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1207 |
16.7% |
0.16742960 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1063 |
14.7% |
0.14745457 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1316 |
18.3% |
0.18254959 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1243 |
17.2% |
0.17242336 |
| 6 |
Really like |
582 |
8.1% |
0.08073242 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
236 |
3.3% |
0.03273686 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
1.2% |
0.01206825 |
r13meme1_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme1_1-3 ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme1_1-3 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1370] [Invalid:5839]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway |
685 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| 2 |
your local community |
685 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue: 1. [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are, in your opinion, the main political issues or areas for
[Norway/your local community]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13meme1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue: 2. [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are, in your opinion, the main political issues or areas for
[Norway/your local community]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13meme1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue: 3. [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are, in your opinion, the main political issues or areas for
[Norway/your local community]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 ][Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13km1
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think when you hear or read “climate change” [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read “climate change”
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r8km1 is answered]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
eips2018c_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Collects values from eips2017c_ran]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Collects values from eips2017c_ran]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1760] [Invalid:5449]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[BLANK] |
355 |
20.2% |
0.2017045 |
| 2 |
for you personally |
357 |
20.3% |
0.2028409 |
| 3 |
for Norway |
358 |
20.3% |
0.2034091 |
| 4 |
for Europe |
338 |
19.2% |
0.1920455 |
| 5 |
for the world |
352 |
20.0% |
0.2000000 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5449 |
|
NA |
eips2018c
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you see climate change as a threat [BLANK/for you
personally/for Norway/for Europe/for the World].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you see climate change as a threat [BLANK / for you
personally / for Norway / for Europe / for the world]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if value on eips2017c_ran]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 No threat at all |
63 |
3.6% |
0.035795455 |
| 2 |
1 |
32 |
1.8% |
0.018181818 |
| 3 |
2 |
81 |
4.6% |
0.046022727 |
| 4 |
3 |
135 |
7.7% |
0.076704545 |
| 5 |
4 |
110 |
6.2% |
0.062500000 |
| 6 |
5 |
244 |
13.9% |
0.138636364 |
| 7 |
6 |
217 |
12.3% |
0.123295455 |
| 8 |
7 |
313 |
17.8% |
0.177840909 |
| 9 |
8 |
296 |
16.8% |
0.168181818 |
| 10 |
9 |
126 |
7.2% |
0.071590909 |
| 11 |
10 Extreme threat |
140 |
8.0% |
0.079545455 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001704545 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5449 |
|
NA |
r13km_moral_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13km_moral if r13group = 4 or 5]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13km_moral if r13group = 4 or 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2777] [Invalid:4432]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
B: The responsibility for emission cuts should be allocated as fairly as
possible between the countries, even though it may lead to significant costs for
Norway |
698 |
25.1% |
0.2513504 |
| 2 |
B: The countries that have up until now emitted the most greenhouse gases should
make the biggest cuts, even though it may lead to significant costs for Norway |
538 |
19.4% |
0.1937342 |
| 3 |
B: The wealthy countries should make the biggest cuts, even though it may lead
to significant costs for Norway |
492 |
17.7% |
0.1771696 |
| 4 |
B: All countries should reduce their emissions by the same percentage, even
though it may lead to significant costs for Norway |
555 |
20.0% |
0.1998560 |
| 5 |
B: All people should be entitled to emit the same amount of Co2 greenhouse
gases, with the size of a country's population determining the amount of
greenhouse gases the country can emit, even though it may lead to significant
costs for Norway |
494 |
17.8% |
0.1778898 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4432 |
|
NA |
r13km_moral
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with which position on allocation of emission cuts: Norwegian
economic interests vs [R13KM_MORAL_RAN].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following describes two opposing positions in the question of how
responsibility for emission cuts should be allocated between countries
in international climate agreements.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these positions do you most agree with?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4 or 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree very much more with A |
123 |
4.4% |
0.04429240 |
| 2 |
Agree much more with A |
165 |
5.9% |
0.05941664 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat more with A |
285 |
10.3% |
0.10262874 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat more with B |
624 |
22.5% |
0.22470292 |
| 5 |
Agree much more with B |
772 |
27.8% |
0.27799784 |
| 6 |
Agree very much more with B |
537 |
19.3% |
0.19337414 |
| 7 |
Agree with neither A nor B |
240 |
8.6% |
0.08642420 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.1% |
0.01116313 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4432 |
|
NA |
r13kmmoral_open
|
Variable label:
|
Elaboration on allocation of climate cuts between countries [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like to ask you to elaborate on your opinion on how the
responsibility for emission cuts should be allocated between countries.
|
|
Post-question:
|
We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or
just a few words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4 or 5]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13kmplast
|
Variable label:
|
Participated in campaigns to collect plastic from nature last 12 months.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
This question applies to plastic in the ocean, and organised campaigns
designed to collect plastic from the countryside, e.g. on beaches, along
the coast, in rivers and in lakes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you taken part in any campaigns designed to collect plastic from
the countryside during the last 12 months?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please select the most suitable option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I have participated in one or more organised campaigns designed to collect
the plastic from the countryside |
87 |
6.0% |
0.059834938 |
| 2 |
I have collected plastic on my own (not as part of an organised campaign). |
517 |
35.6% |
0.355570839 |
| 3 |
I have wanted to collect plastic, but so far I have not done so. |
277 |
19.1% |
0.190508941 |
| 4 |
No. |
570 |
39.2% |
0.392022008 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002063274 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13kmplast_text
|
Variable label:
|
Comments to [R13KMPLAST] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments, please write them here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy
considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers
after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13km30
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree moral duty for individuals to contribute to prevent
climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what degree do you regard it as a moral duty for individuals to
contribute towards preventing climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
429 |
29.5% |
0.295048143 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
588 |
40.4% |
0.404401651 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
369 |
25.4% |
0.253782669 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
45 |
3.1% |
0.030949106 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
19 |
1.3% |
0.013067400 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002751032 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km64
|
Variable label:
|
How postitive or negative will climate change be for Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change will affect each country in different ways.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative do you think climate change will be for Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Only positive |
16 |
1.1% |
0.011004127 |
| 2 |
More positive than negative |
151 |
10.4% |
0.103851444 |
| 3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
284 |
19.5% |
0.195323246 |
| 4 |
More negative than positive |
872 |
60.0% |
0.599724897 |
| 5 |
Only negative |
119 |
8.2% |
0.081843191 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.8% |
0.008253095 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Hope.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hope
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
to “very strong”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
80 |
5.5% |
0.05502063 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
302 |
20.8% |
0.20770289 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
760 |
52.3% |
0.52269601 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
243 |
16.7% |
0.16712517 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
35 |
2.4% |
0.02407153 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2.3% |
0.02338377 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Sadness.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sadness
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
to “very strong”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
107 |
7.4% |
0.07359010 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
270 |
18.6% |
0.18569464 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
593 |
40.8% |
0.40784044 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
347 |
23.9% |
0.23865199 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
99 |
6.8% |
0.06808803 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.6% |
0.02613480 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Fear.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
to “very strong”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
152 |
10.5% |
0.10453920 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
375 |
25.8% |
0.25790922 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
613 |
42.2% |
0.42159560 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
223 |
15.3% |
0.15337001 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
55 |
3.8% |
0.03782669 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
2.5% |
0.02475928 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_4
|
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Anger.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
to “very strong”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
207 |
14.2% |
0.14236589 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
398 |
27.4% |
0.27372765 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
537 |
36.9% |
0.36932600 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
212 |
14.6% |
0.14580468 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
62 |
4.3% |
0.04264099 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.6% |
0.02613480 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_5
|
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Guilt.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Guilt
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
to “very strong”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
214 |
14.7% |
0.14718019 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
497 |
34.2% |
0.34181568 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
583 |
40.1% |
0.40096286 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
111 |
7.6% |
0.07634113 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
18 |
1.2% |
0.01237964 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.1% |
0.02132050 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_6
|
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Tired of it.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tired of it
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
to “very strong”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
458 |
31.5% |
0.31499312 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
383 |
26.3% |
0.26341128 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
426 |
29.3% |
0.29298487 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
89 |
6.1% |
0.06121045 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
58 |
4.0% |
0.03988996 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.8% |
0.02751032 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13kmkopris_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmkopris if
r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmkopris if
r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1448] [Invalid:5761]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very negative - Very positive |
708 |
48.9% |
0.4889503 |
| 2 |
Very positive - Very negative |
740 |
51.1% |
0.5110497 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5761 |
|
NA |
r13kmkopris
|
Variable label:
|
Positive or negative about rush hour increases in toll ring cost.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Several Norwegian cities have introduced a toll scheme which would cost
more to cross the toll ring during rush hour and cost less outside of
rush hour.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel positive or negative about such a scheme?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
137 |
9.4% |
0.094222834 |
| 2 |
Positive |
268 |
18.4% |
0.184319120 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
238 |
16.4% |
0.163686382 |
| 4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
147 |
10.1% |
0.101100413 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
203 |
14.0% |
0.139614856 |
| 6 |
Negative |
185 |
12.7% |
0.127235213 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
266 |
18.3% |
0.182943604 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.006877579 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km_kopris_open
|
Variable label:
|
Comment on [R13KMKOPRIS] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
You can write a comment here if you want:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13km_klima_tiltak
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Unsure about what I can do to reduce climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I’m unsure what I can do in my daily life to reduce climate change.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
28 |
1.9% |
0.019257221 |
| 2 |
Agree |
124 |
8.5% |
0.085281981 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
266 |
18.3% |
0.182943604 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
228 |
15.7% |
0.156808803 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
332 |
22.8% |
0.228335626 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
376 |
25.9% |
0.258596974 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
91 |
6.3% |
0.062585970 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.6% |
0.006189821 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km_politisk_tiltak
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I am unsure about what policy measure are good for
reducing climate change.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am unsure what policy measures are good for reducing climate change.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
59 |
4.1% |
0.040577717 |
| 2 |
Agree |
205 |
14.1% |
0.140990371 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
384 |
26.4% |
0.264099037 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
214 |
14.7% |
0.147180193 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
259 |
17.8% |
0.178129298 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
250 |
17.2% |
0.171939477 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
69 |
4.7% |
0.047455296 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.0% |
0.009628611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km_politisk_tiltak_open
|
Variable label:
|
Comment on [R13KM_POLITISK_TILTAK] [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have additional comments regarding policy measures, please write
them here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy
considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers
after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13polkom10
|
Variable label:
|
How confident that fact-checking services present facts.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In Norway, we have various fact-checking services (such as Faktisk.no)
that fact-check Norwegian public debate. The aim of such fact-checking
services is to contribute to a fact-based public debate and prevent the
spread of fictitious messages and news.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have that such services
present the facts?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
67 |
4.8% |
0.04761905 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
485 |
34.5% |
0.34470505 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
637 |
45.3% |
0.45273632 |
| 4 |
Little confidence |
154 |
10.9% |
0.10945274 |
| 5 |
No confidence at all |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02274343 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02274343 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5802 |
|
NA |
r13polkom11_parti
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects political party for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects political party for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1388] [Invalid:5821]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
133 |
9.6% |
0.09582133 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
154 |
11.1% |
0.11095101 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party |
155 |
11.2% |
0.11167147 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
150 |
10.8% |
0.10806916 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
170 |
12.2% |
0.12247839 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party |
137 |
9.9% |
0.09870317 |
| 7 |
The Christian Democrats |
170 |
12.2% |
0.12247839 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party |
155 |
11.2% |
0.11167147 |
| 9 |
The Progress Party |
164 |
11.8% |
0.11815562 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5821 |
|
NA |
r13polkom11_konklusjon
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects conclusion for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects conclusion for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1388] [Invalid:5821]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
completely true. |
314 |
22.6% |
0.2262248 |
| 2 |
completely wrong. |
362 |
26.1% |
0.2608069 |
| 3 |
completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party agree with the
conclusion of the fact-checking service. |
346 |
24.9% |
0.2492795 |
| 4 |
completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party disagree with
the conclusion of the fact-checking service. |
366 |
26.4% |
0.2636888 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5821 |
|
NA |
r13polkom11
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in fact-checking service given that statement from [party]
was deemed [wrong/true.]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you read a fact-check from a Norwegian fact-checking
service that concludes that a statement by a politician from [The Red
Party/The Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The
Green Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative
Party/The Progress Party] is [completely true/completely
wrong/completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party
agree with the conclusion of the fact-checking service/completely wrong.
Afterwards, key politicians from the same party disagree with the
conclusion of the fact-checking service].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on the above information, how much confidence would you have had
in the conclusion of the fact-checking service on this matter?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
83 |
5.9% |
0.05899076 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
464 |
33.0% |
0.32977967 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
574 |
40.8% |
0.40796020 |
| 4 |
Little confidence |
194 |
13.8% |
0.13788202 |
| 5 |
No confidence at all |
42 |
3.0% |
0.02985075 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
3.6% |
0.03553660 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5802 |
|
NA |
r13kmkt_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar,
r13kmktresearch and r13kmktuse]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar,
r13kmktresearch and r13kmktuse]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1495] [Invalid:5714]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
727 |
48.6% |
0.4862876 |
| 2 |
2 |
768 |
51.4% |
0.5137124 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5714 |
|
NA |
r13kmktfamiliar_scale
|
Variable label:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar, based on
r13kmkt_ran]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar, based on
r13kmkt_ran]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1495] [Invalid:5714]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No knowledge -> Good knowledge |
727 |
48.6% |
0.4862876 |
| 2 |
Good knowledge -> No knowledge |
768 |
51.4% |
0.5137124 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5714 |
|
NA |
r13kmktfamiliar
|
Variable label:
|
How much knowledge about climate manipulation (solar geoengineering).
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) traps heat in the atmosphere.
When there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the climate can
change, which will lead to it becoming warmer, with more droughts and
heat waves, a rise in sea levels and storms becoming more powerful.
One method for reducing the extent of climate change may possibly be
so-called “climate manipulation” (solar geoengineering), for example by
shading the sun.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much knowledge would you say that you have about this method?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Good knowledge |
18 |
1.2% |
0.012032086 |
| 2 |
Some knowledge |
168 |
11.2% |
0.112299465 |
| 3 |
Little knowledge |
489 |
32.7% |
0.326871658 |
| 4 |
No knowledge |
811 |
54.2% |
0.542112299 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.006684492 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5713 |
|
NA |
r13kmktresearch_scale
|
Variable label:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktresearch, based on
r13kmkt_ran]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktresearch, based on
r13kmkt_ran]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1487] [Invalid:5722]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly against such research ->Strongly in favour of such research |
725 |
48.8% |
0.4875588 |
| 2 |
Strongly in favour of such research ->Strongly against such research |
762 |
51.2% |
0.5124412 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5722 |
|
NA |
r13kmktresearch
|
Variable label:
|
Should be research program for climate manipulation with particles in
the atmosphere.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some experts have proposed a new approach to limiting climate change by
shading the sun. This method will involve spreading particles such as
sulphur aerosols in the atmosphere to reflect some of the sunlight back
into space. By reducing the amount of sunlight coming to earth, it is
expected that this method can cool down the planet and reduce several
other climate changes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think there should be an international research program to
explore the benefits and risks associated with shading the sun using
particles in the atmosphere?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please choose the option that comes closest to your view of such
research:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly in favour of such research |
322 |
21.5% |
0.21524064 |
| 2 |
Somewhat in favour of such research |
690 |
46.1% |
0.46122995 |
| 3 |
Somewhat against such research |
272 |
18.2% |
0.18181818 |
| 4 |
Strongly against such research |
183 |
12.2% |
0.12232620 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.9% |
0.01938503 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5713 |
|
NA |
r13kmktuse_scale
|
Variable label:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktuse, based on
r13kmkt_ran]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktuse, based on
r13kmkt_ran]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1484] [Invalid:5725]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree -> Strongly agree |
724 |
48.8% |
0.4878706 |
| 2 |
Strongly agree-> Strongly disagree |
760 |
51.2% |
0.5121294 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5725 |
|
NA |
r13kmktuse
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Climate manipulation with particles in the atmosphere
should be used to limit global warming.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
“Shading the sun by using particles in the atmosphere should be used to
limit global warming”
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
36 |
2.4% |
0.02406417 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
526 |
35.2% |
0.35160428 |
| 3 |
Disagree somewhat |
537 |
35.9% |
0.35895722 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
326 |
21.8% |
0.21791444 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
4.7% |
0.04745989 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5713 |
|
NA |
r13kmktresearchsecond_1
|
Variable label:
|
What percentage of Norwegian population would support research into
climate manipulation with particles in the atmosphere.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What proportion of the Norwegian population do you think will support an
international research programme of the type we have just mentioned?
(I.e. an international research program to explore the benefits and
risks associated with shading the sun using particles in the
atmosphere?)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please enter a number from 0 (none) to 100 (all).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1398] [Invalid:5811]
[Range:0-100]
|
r13kmktusesecond_1
|
Variable label:
|
What proportion of Norwegian population would support using climate
manipulation with particles in the atmosphere.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What proportion of the Norwegian population do you believe will agree
with this assertion:
“Shading the sun by using particles in the atmosphere should be used to
limit global warming”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please enter a number from 0 (none) to 100 (all).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1378] [Invalid:5831]
[Range:0-100]
|
r13kmktresearchopen
|
Variable label:
|
Justification of response : [R13KMTRESEARCH][Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You replied that you were [r13kmktresearch ] an international research
program to explore the benefits and risks associated with shading the
sun using particles in the atmosphere.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you write some words or sentences in the box below to justify your
response?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3 and if response on r13kmktresearch][Text data
will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can
be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen
Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13polkom2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects r13polkom2 or r13polkom5. Randomizes if 13group = 3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects r13polkom2 or r13polkom5. Randomizes if 13group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1470] [Invalid:5739]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent does not get R13POLKOM2 |
774 |
52.7% |
0.5265306 |
| 2 |
Respondent gets R13POLKOM2 |
696 |
47.3% |
0.4734694 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5739 |
|
NA |
r13polkom2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Difference between real and fake news. [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Fake news has been discussed a lot lately.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We are interested in what you think is the difference between real and
fake news?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or
just a few words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3 and r13polkom2_ran = 2] [Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13polkom4_1_stilling
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person
1’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person
1’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Professor |
974 |
34.2% |
0.3423550 |
| 2 |
PhD Research Fellow |
939 |
33.0% |
0.3300527 |
| 3 |
Independent researcher without a PhD |
932 |
32.8% |
0.3275923 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_stilling
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person
2’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person
2’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Professor |
936 |
32.9% |
0.3289982 |
| 2 |
PhD Research Fellow |
988 |
34.7% |
0.3472759 |
| 3 |
Independent researcher without a PhD |
921 |
32.4% |
0.3237258 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_kom
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
visibility in the media for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
visibility in the media for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
frequently appears as an expert in the media |
932 |
32.8% |
0.3275923 |
| 2 |
rarely appears as an expert in the media |
967 |
34.0% |
0.3398946 |
| 3 |
never appears as an expert in the media |
946 |
33.3% |
0.3325132 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_kom
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
visibility in the media for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
visibility in the media for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
frequently appears as an expert in the media |
972 |
34.2% |
0.3416520 |
| 2 |
rarely appears as an expert in the media |
915 |
32.2% |
0.3216169 |
| 3 |
never appears as an expert in the media |
958 |
33.7% |
0.3367311 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_gender
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender
for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender
for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1416 |
49.8% |
0.4977153 |
| 2 |
Female |
1429 |
50.2% |
0.5022847 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_gender
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender
for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender
for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1439 |
50.6% |
0.5057996 |
| 2 |
Female |
1406 |
49.4% |
0.4942004 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_parti
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political
standpoint for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political
standpoint for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not known |
227 |
8.0% |
0.07978910 |
| 2 |
Politically neutral |
276 |
9.7% |
0.09701230 |
| 3 |
The Red Party |
243 |
8.5% |
0.08541301 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
256 |
9.0% |
0.08998243 |
| 5 |
The Labour Party |
279 |
9.8% |
0.09806678 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
263 |
9.2% |
0.09244288 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
259 |
9.1% |
0.09103691 |
| 8 |
The Liberal Party |
272 |
9.6% |
0.09560633 |
| 9 |
The Christian Democrats |
273 |
9.6% |
0.09595782 |
| 10 |
The Conservative Party |
266 |
9.3% |
0.09349736 |
| 11 |
The Progress Party |
231 |
8.1% |
0.08119508 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_parti
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political
standpoint for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political
standpoint for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not known |
276 |
9.7% |
0.09701230 |
| 2 |
Politically neutral |
265 |
9.3% |
0.09314587 |
| 3 |
The Red Party |
250 |
8.8% |
0.08787346 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
252 |
8.9% |
0.08857645 |
| 5 |
The Labour Party |
239 |
8.4% |
0.08400703 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
273 |
9.6% |
0.09595782 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
267 |
9.4% |
0.09384886 |
| 8 |
The Liberal Party |
232 |
8.2% |
0.08154657 |
| 9 |
The Christian Democrats |
264 |
9.3% |
0.09279438 |
| 10 |
The Conservative Party |
270 |
9.5% |
0.09490334 |
| 11 |
The Progress Party |
257 |
9.0% |
0.09033392 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_publ
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
publication for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
publication for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in an internationally leading scientific journal |
933 |
32.8% |
0.3279438 |
| 2 |
in a scientific Norwegian journal |
945 |
33.2% |
0.3321617 |
| 3 |
as a Norwegian report |
967 |
34.0% |
0.3398946 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_publ
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
publication for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
publication for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in an internationally leading scientific journal |
972 |
34.2% |
0.3416520 |
| 2 |
in a scientific Norwegian journal |
950 |
33.4% |
0.3339192 |
| 3 |
as a Norwegian report |
923 |
32.4% |
0.3244288 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_funn
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings
for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings
for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers |
1484 |
52.2% |
0.5216169 |
| 2 |
the number of municipalities should not be reduced further by more mergers |
1361 |
47.8% |
0.4783831 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_funn
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings
for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings
for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers |
1461 |
51.4% |
0.5135325 |
| 2 |
the number of municipalities should not be reduced further by more mergers |
1384 |
48.6% |
0.4864675 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_metode
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method
for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method
for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
depth interviews |
982 |
34.5% |
0.3451670 |
| 2 |
experiments |
924 |
32.5% |
0.3247803 |
| 3 |
a survey |
939 |
33.0% |
0.3300527 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_metode
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method
for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method
for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
depth interviews |
975 |
34.3% |
0.3427065 |
| 2 |
experiments |
952 |
33.5% |
0.3346221 |
| 3 |
a survey |
918 |
32.3% |
0.3226714 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_order
|
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable for conjoint experiment. Specifies the order of
the various properties shown in the table that is displayed to the
respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Specifies the order of
the various properties shown in the table that is displayed to the
respondent.
1 = Position and employment 2 = Visibility in the media 3 = Gender 4 =
Political standpoint 5 = The person’s latest scientific article has been
published… 6 = The person’s latest scientific article finds that
immigration is… 7 = The person’s latest scientific article uses…]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13polkom4
|
Variable label:
|
Which person gives the most credible infomration about the consequences
of municipality mergers?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we present two hypothetical persons who research the
consequences of municipal mergers in Norway. Please read the
descriptions of both persons carefully and answer the question
below.
[Prints out the values of r13polkom4_1_stilling,
r13polkom4_2_stilling, r13polkom4_1_kom, r13polkom4_2_kom,
r13polkom4_1_gender, r13polkom4_2_gender, r13polkom4_1_parti,
r13polkom4_2_parti, r13polkom4_1_publ, r13polkom4_2_publ,
r13polkom4_1_funn, r13polkom4_2_funn, r13polkom4_1_metode,
r13polkom4_2_metode]
Let’s say you didn’t have any information other than the above.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to make a choice, which of these two do you think would give
you the most credible information about the consequences of municipality
mergers in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to two people with varying
characteristics. Characteristics of the persons are chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 3 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Person 1 |
1346 |
46.4% |
0.46365828 |
| 2 |
Person 2 |
1351 |
46.5% |
0.46538064 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
206 |
7.1% |
0.07096107 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4306 |
|
NA |
r13pad1
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: Ban on begging in your municipality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are two issues that have been debated in local politics in Norway.
We would like to hear your opinion on the issue.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Firstly, what is your opinion on a ban on begging in your municipality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am in favour of a ban on begging in the municipality |
1705 |
59.0% |
0.59016961 |
| 2 |
I am against a ban on begging in the municipality |
1103 |
38.2% |
0.38179301 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
2.8% |
0.02803738 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4320 |
|
NA |
r13pad2
|
Variable label:
|
How important is the issue of begging bans to you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is the issue of begging bans to you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
179 |
6.2% |
0.06195916 |
| 2 |
Important |
530 |
18.3% |
0.18345448 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
914 |
31.6% |
0.31637245 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
1013 |
35.1% |
0.35064036 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
197 |
6.8% |
0.06818969 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
1.9% |
0.01938387 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4320 |
|
NA |
r13pad3
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: Increase in tolls for diesel cars in your municipality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The second issue is about diesel cars.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on an increase in the tolls for diesel cars in your
municipality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am in favour of an increase in the tolls for diesel cars |
705 |
24.4% |
0.24402908 |
| 2 |
I am against an increase in the tolls for diesel cars |
2101 |
72.7% |
0.72724126 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
2.9% |
0.02872966 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4320 |
|
NA |
r13pad4
|
Variable label:
|
How important is the issue of increased tolls for diesel cars to you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is the issue of increased tolls for diesel cars to you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
487 |
16.9% |
0.16857044 |
| 2 |
Important |
776 |
26.9% |
0.26860505 |
| 3 |
Fairly important |
754 |
26.1% |
0.26098996 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
610 |
21.1% |
0.21114573 |
| 5 |
Not at all important |
201 |
7.0% |
0.06957425 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
61 |
2.1% |
0.02111457 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4320 |
|
NA |
r13pad6_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly chooses r13pad6a, r13pad7a, and r13pad8a, or r13pad6b,
r13pad7b, and r13pad8b. . Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly chooses r13pad6a, r13pad7a og r13pad8a, or r13pad6b, r13pad7b
or r13pad8b. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent gets R13PAD6A, R13PAD7A, and R13PAD8A |
1483 |
52.2% |
0.5216321 |
| 2 |
Respondent gets R13PAD6B, R13PAD7B, and R13PAD8B |
1360 |
47.8% |
0.4783679 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_sak
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects issue of
a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects issue of
a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the
municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in
favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a
ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging |
1431 |
50.3% |
0.5033415 |
| 2 |
in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial
decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the
"Yes-side"), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars. |
1412 |
49.7% |
0.4966585 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_utfall
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
outcome of the issue of a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group
= 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
outcome of the issue of a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if
r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Yes side won the vote |
1421 |
50.0% |
0.4998241 |
| 2 |
The No side won the vote |
1422 |
50.0% |
0.5001759 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_vinnermargin
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
winning margin in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2
or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
winning margin in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2
or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
. |
974 |
34.3% |
0.3425958 |
| 2 |
with a slight majority. |
921 |
32.4% |
0.3239536 |
| 3 |
With a large majority. |
948 |
33.3% |
0.3334506 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_vinner
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
reaction of the winner in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if
r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
reaction of the winner in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if
r13group = 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[BLANK] |
1391 |
48.9% |
0.4892719 |
| 2 |
Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good
decision and that common sense prevailed. |
1452 |
51.1% |
0.5107281 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_avsender
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects statement
made by losing side in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group
= 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects statement
made by losing side in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group
= 2 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[BLANK] |
368 |
12.9% |
0.1294407 |
| 2 |
The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they
are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. |
428 |
15.1% |
0.1505452 |
| 3 |
The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they
are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight
where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views. |
425 |
14.9% |
0.1494900 |
| 4 |
The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they
are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a
democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. |
408 |
14.4% |
0.1435104 |
| 5 |
The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial
that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. |
402 |
14.1% |
0.1413999 |
| 6 |
The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial
that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was
a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their
views. |
397 |
14.0% |
0.1396412 |
| 7 |
The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial
that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what
living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. |
415 |
14.6% |
0.1459726 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad6a
|
Variable label:
|
Text options: How fair was the way the decision was made.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that
follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging
on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is
a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban
(the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the
“no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel
cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some
residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”),
while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The
decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual
procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal
council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their
opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public,
and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue.
[The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight
majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a
politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that
common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was
against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the
decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against
the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was
wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity
to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that
was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the
decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was
against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed
and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against
the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and
that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both
sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local
newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision -
writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision
was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the way the decision was made?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very fair |
251 |
16.9% |
0.16925152 |
| 2 |
Fair |
864 |
58.3% |
0.58260283 |
| 3 |
Quite fair |
204 |
13.8% |
0.13755900 |
| 4 |
Not very fair |
85 |
5.7% |
0.05731625 |
| 5 |
Not at all fair |
46 |
3.1% |
0.03101821 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.2% |
0.02225219 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5726 |
|
NA |
r13pad6b
|
Variable label:
|
Scale options: How fair was the way the decision was made.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that
follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging
on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is
a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban
(the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the
“no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel
cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some
residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”),
while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The
decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual
procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal
council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their
opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public,
and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue.
[The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight
majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a
politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that
common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was
against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the
decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against
the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was
wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity
to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that
was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the
decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was
against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed
and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against
the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and
that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both
sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local
newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision -
writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision
was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the way the decision was made?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please answer on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is most fair, and 5 is not
fair.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 Most fair |
584 |
42.9% |
0.42941176 |
| 2 |
2 |
413 |
30.4% |
0.30367647 |
| 3 |
3 |
223 |
16.4% |
0.16397059 |
| 4 |
4 |
62 |
4.6% |
0.04558824 |
| 5 |
5 Not fair |
55 |
4.0% |
0.04044118 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.7% |
0.01691176 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5849 |
|
NA |
r13pad7a
|
Variable label:
|
Text options: How reasonable was the decision.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that
follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging
on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is
a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban
(the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the
“no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel
cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some
residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”),
while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The
decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual
procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal
council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their
opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public,
and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won
the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large
majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning
side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed]
[blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision
says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The
leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the
decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was
wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes
you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides
had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local
newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision -
writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision
was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How reasonable do you think the decision was?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very reasonable |
182 |
12.3% |
0.12272421 |
| 2 |
Reasonable |
719 |
48.5% |
0.48482805 |
| 3 |
Somewhat reasonable |
247 |
16.7% |
0.16655428 |
| 4 |
Not very reasonable |
207 |
14.0% |
0.13958193 |
| 5 |
Not reasonable at all |
90 |
6.1% |
0.06068780 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.6% |
0.02562374 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5726 |
|
NA |
r13pad7b
|
Variable label:
|
Scale options: How reasonable was the decision.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that
follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging
on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is
a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban
(the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the
“no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel
cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some
residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”),
while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The
decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual
procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal
council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their
opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public,
and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won
the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large
majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning
side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed]
[blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision
says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The
leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the
decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was
wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes
you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides
had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local
newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision -
writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision
was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How reasonable do you think the decision was?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please answer on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is most reasonable, and 5 is
not reasonable.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 Most reasonable |
430 |
31.6% |
0.31617647 |
| 2 |
2 |
363 |
26.7% |
0.26691176 |
| 3 |
3 |
313 |
23.0% |
0.23014706 |
| 4 |
4 |
123 |
9.0% |
0.09044118 |
| 5 |
5 Not reasonable |
98 |
7.2% |
0.07205882 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02426471 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5849 |
|
NA |
r13pad8a
|
Variable label:
|
Text options: How willing to accept the decision.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that
follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging
on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is
a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban
(the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the
“no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel
cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some
residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”),
while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The
decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual
procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal
council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their
opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public,
and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won
the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large
majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning
side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed]
[blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision
says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The
leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the
decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was
wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes
you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides
had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local
newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision -
writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision
was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
When you think about the actual outcome of the decision, how willing are
you to accept the decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
294 |
19.8% |
0.19824680 |
| 2 |
Willing |
740 |
49.9% |
0.49898854 |
| 3 |
Fairly willing |
232 |
15.6% |
0.15643965 |
| 4 |
Not very willing |
138 |
9.3% |
0.09305462 |
| 5 |
Not at all willing |
47 |
3.2% |
0.03169252 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
2.2% |
0.02157788 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5726 |
|
NA |
r13pad8b
|
Variable label:
|
Scale options: How willing to accept the decision.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that
follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging
on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is
a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban
(the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the
“no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel
cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some
residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”),
while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The
decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual
procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal
council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their
opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public,
and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won
the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large
majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning
side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed]
[blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision
says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The
leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the
decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was
wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes
you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the
decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that
the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides
had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local
newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that
they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a
fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of
their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision -
writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision
was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about.
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
|
Literal question:
|
When you think about the actual outcome of the decision, how willing are
you to accept the decision?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please answer on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is most willing, and 5 is
not willing.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 Most willing |
571 |
42.0% |
0.41985294 |
| 2 |
2 |
397 |
29.2% |
0.29191176 |
| 3 |
3 |
216 |
15.9% |
0.15882353 |
| 4 |
4 |
77 |
5.7% |
0.05661765 |
| 5 |
5 Not willing |
72 |
5.3% |
0.05294118 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2.0% |
0.01985294 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5849 |
|
NA |
r13polkom6_parti
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects party
preference for the person who posts in social media. Randomizes if
r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects party
preference for the person who posts in social media. Randomizes if
r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1446] [Invalid:5763]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
155 |
10.7% |
0.1071923 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
166 |
11.5% |
0.1147994 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party |
157 |
10.9% |
0.1085754 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
151 |
10.4% |
0.1044260 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
181 |
12.5% |
0.1251729 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party |
165 |
11.4% |
0.1141079 |
| 7 |
The Christian Democrats |
150 |
10.4% |
0.1037344 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party |
149 |
10.3% |
0.1030429 |
| 9 |
The Progress Party |
172 |
11.9% |
0.1189488 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5763 |
|
NA |
r13polkom6_kilde
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
source of the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if
r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
source of the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if
r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1446] [Invalid:5763]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK.no |
369 |
25.5% |
0.2551867 |
| 2 |
Aftenposten.no |
349 |
24.1% |
0.2413555 |
| 3 |
VG.no |
359 |
24.8% |
0.2482711 |
| 4 |
TV2.no |
369 |
25.5% |
0.2551867 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5763 |
|
NA |
r13polkom6_omtale
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
persons view on the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes
if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
persons view on the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes
if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1446] [Invalid:5763]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
. |
511 |
35.3% |
0.3533887 |
| 2 |
and have written a negative comment about the debate article. |
455 |
31.5% |
0.3146611 |
| 3 |
and have written a positive comment about the debate article. |
480 |
33.2% |
0.3319502 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5763 |
|
NA |
r13polkom6_overskrift
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
headline of the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if
r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
headline of the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if
r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1446] [Invalid:5763]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” |
466 |
32.2% |
0.3222683 |
| 2 |
“Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” |
507 |
35.1% |
0.3506224 |
| 3 |
“Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture” |
473 |
32.7% |
0.3271093 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5763 |
|
NA |
r13polkom6
|
Variable label:
|
How likely to come across a similar situation on social media.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you come across a post on social media that has been
shared by one of your contacts who you know votes for [The Red Party/The
Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green
Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative
Party/The Progress Party], is of the same gender and is about the same
age as you.
Imagine that this person has shared a debate article from [NRK.no /
Aftenposten.no / VG.no / TV2.no] on social media [. /and have written a
negative comment about the debate article. /and have written a positive
comment about the debate article. ]
The headline of the debate article that the person has shared is
[“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration
threatens our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration can both
threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture”].
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would have come across a similar situation on
social media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to hypthetical post in
social media. Characteristics of the post is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
111 |
7.6% |
0.07634113 |
| 2 |
Likely |
249 |
17.1% |
0.17125172 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
332 |
22.8% |
0.22833563 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
401 |
27.6% |
0.27579092 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
120 |
8.3% |
0.08253095 |
| 6 |
I am not on social media |
221 |
15.2% |
0.15199450 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.4% |
0.01375516 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13polkom7
|
Variable label:
|
How likely to click on and read article had you come across it.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you come across a post on social media that has been
shared by one of your contacts who you know votes for [The Red Party/The
Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green
Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative
Party/The Progress Party], is of the same gender and is about the same
age as you.
Imagine that this person has shared a debate article from [NRK.no /
Aftenposten.no / VG.no / TV2.no] on social media [. /and have written a
negative comment about the debate article. /and have written a positive
comment about the debate article. ]
The headline of the debate article that the person has shared is
[“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration
threatens our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration can both
threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture”].
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on and read this debate
article if you had come across this post on social media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to hypthetical post in
social media. Characteristics of the post is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
125 |
8.6% |
0.08596974 |
| 2 |
Likely |
301 |
20.7% |
0.20701513 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
339 |
23.3% |
0.23314993 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
338 |
23.2% |
0.23246217 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
129 |
8.9% |
0.08872077 |
| 6 |
I am not on social media |
199 |
13.7% |
0.13686382 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.6% |
0.01581843 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13polkom8
|
Variable label:
|
How likely to want to see more posts from that person again on social
media.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you come across a post on social media that has been
shared by one of your contacts who you know votes for [The Red Party/The
Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green
Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative
Party/The Progress Party], is of the same gender and is about the same
age as you.
Imagine that this person has shared a debate article from [NRK.no /
Aftenposten.no / VG.no / TV2.no] on social media [. /and have written a
negative comment about the debate article. /and have written a positive
comment about the debate article. ]
The headline of the debate article that the person has shared is
[“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration
threatens our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration can both
threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture”].
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you had wanted to see more posts from that person
again on social media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to hypthetical post in
social media. Characteristics of the post is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
34 |
2.3% |
0.02338377 |
| 2 |
Likely |
165 |
11.3% |
0.11348006 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
338 |
23.2% |
0.23246217 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
493 |
33.9% |
0.33906465 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
194 |
13.3% |
0.13342503 |
| 6 |
I am not on social media |
202 |
13.9% |
0.13892710 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.9% |
0.01925722 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13polkom9
|
Variable label:
|
Based on headline, the article argues that immigration is advantage or
disadvantage to Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you come across a post on social media that has been
shared by one of your contacts who you know votes for [The Red Party/The
Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green
Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative
Party/The Progress Party], is of the same gender and is about the same
age as you.
Imagine that this person has shared a debate article from [NRK.no /
Aftenposten.no / VG.no / TV2.no] on social media [. /and have written a
negative comment about the debate article. /and have written a positive
comment about the debate article. ]
The headline of the debate article that the person has shared is
[“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration
threatens our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration can both
threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture”].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on the headline of the debate article, to what extent would you
say that the debate article argues that it is an advantage or
disadvantage that immigrants come to Norway to settle here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to hypthetical post in
social media. Characteristics of the post is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very great advantage |
41 |
2.8% |
0.02819807 |
| 2 |
Great advantage |
178 |
12.2% |
0.12242091 |
| 3 |
Slightly advantageous |
302 |
20.8% |
0.20770289 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
344 |
23.7% |
0.23658872 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
217 |
14.9% |
0.14924347 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
221 |
15.2% |
0.15199450 |
| 7 |
Very great disadvantage |
101 |
6.9% |
0.06946355 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
3.4% |
0.03438790 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_kjonn_antagonist
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
gender of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if
r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
gender of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if
r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
male |
1461 |
50.4% |
0.5039669 |
| 2 |
female |
1438 |
49.6% |
0.4960331 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_stilling_antagonist
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
position of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if
r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
position of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if
r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
manager |
1455 |
50.2% |
0.5018972 |
| 2 |
temporary employee |
1444 |
49.8% |
0.4981028 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_alder_antagonist
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the age
of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group =
1 or 2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the age
of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group =
1 or 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
20s |
1495 |
51.6% |
0.5156951 |
| 2 |
50s |
1404 |
48.4% |
0.4843049 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_budskap
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
message of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if
r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
message of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if
r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
gives a hug to |
747 |
25.8% |
0.2576751 |
| 2 |
sends flirty text messages to |
698 |
24.1% |
0.2407727 |
| 3 |
sends text messages of a sexual nature to |
724 |
25.0% |
0.2497413 |
| 4 |
slaps the bottom of |
730 |
25.2% |
0.2518110 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_kjonn_offer
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
gender of the offened person in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if
r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
gender of the offened person in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if
r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
male |
1456 |
50.2% |
0.5022422 |
| 2 |
female |
1443 |
49.8% |
0.4977578 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_stilling_offer
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
position of the offened person in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes
if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
position of the offened person in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes
if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
manager |
1449 |
50.0% |
0.4998275 |
| 2 |
temporary employee |
1450 |
50.0% |
0.5001725 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_alder_offer
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the age
of the offened person in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if
r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the age
of the offened person in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if
r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
20s |
1454 |
50.2% |
0.5015523 |
| 2 |
50s |
1445 |
49.8% |
0.4984477 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_folelse
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
emotion of the offened person in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if
r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
emotion of the offened person in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes
if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Experience it as degrading |
984 |
33.9% |
0.3394274 |
| 2 |
not find it pleasant |
946 |
32.6% |
0.3263194 |
| 3 |
find it pleasant |
969 |
33.4% |
0.3342532 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_arbeidssituasjon
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the work
environment of the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or
2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the work
environment of the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1
or 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
together at a university |
959 |
33.1% |
0.3308037 |
| 2 |
together in a company |
945 |
32.6% |
0.3259745 |
| 3 |
together in a political party |
995 |
34.3% |
0.3432218 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_sted
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
location of the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
location of the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or
2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
work |
926 |
31.9% |
0.3194205 |
| 2 |
private party |
998 |
34.4% |
0.3442566 |
| 3 |
work party |
975 |
33.6% |
0.3363229 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12
|
Variable label:
|
Perceives the situation as sexual harassment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the question below.
A [male/female] [manager/temporary employee] aged [20s/50s] [gives a hug
to/sends flirty text messages to/sends text messages of a sexual nature
to/slaps the bottom of] a [male/female] [manager/temporary employee]
aged [20s/50s] that [Experience it as degrading/ not find it pleasant/
find it pleasant]. They work [together at a university/together in a
company/together in a political party]. The incident occurred at
[work/private party/work party].
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you perceive it, does this situation describe sexual harassment?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1119 |
38.1% |
0.38113079 |
| 2 |
No |
1749 |
59.6% |
0.59570845 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
68 |
2.3% |
0.02316076 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4273 |
|
NA |
r13polkom13
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: situation is problematic.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read
through the situation carefully and then answer the question below.
A [male/female] [manager/temporary employee] aged [20s/50s] [gives a hug
to/sends flirty text messages to/sends text messages of a sexual nature
to/slaps the bottom of] a [male/female] [manager/temporary employee]
aged [20s/50s] that [Experience it as degrading/ not find it pleasant/
find it pleasant]. They work [together at a university/together in a
company/together in a political party]. The incident occurred at
[work/private party/work party].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that this describes a
problematic situation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
442 |
15.1% |
0.15054496 |
| 2 |
Agree |
721 |
24.6% |
0.24557221 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
471 |
16.0% |
0.16042234 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
320 |
10.9% |
0.10899183 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
211 |
7.2% |
0.07186649 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
442 |
15.1% |
0.15054496 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
274 |
9.3% |
0.09332425 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
1.9% |
0.01873297 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4273 |
|
NA |
r13pad11_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects r13pad11a or r13pad11b. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects r13pad11a or r13pad11b. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1438] [Invalid:5771]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent gets R13PAD11A |
742 |
51.6% |
0.5159944 |
| 2 |
Respondent gets R13PAD11B |
696 |
48.4% |
0.4840056 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5771 |
|
NA |
r13pad11a
|
Variable label:
|
Improvement or deterioration: Automatization of public services.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
A growing trend is that public agencies entrust decisions to
computers instead of giving the task to human beings. The computers make
the decisions in accordance with a predetermined sequence (a so-called
algorithm) that is determined by humans, but once it has been set, a
computer makes its own decisions.
We are interested in investigating what Norwegians think about this
technological development.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, do you think the shift from human to automated
decisions will in general lead to an improvement or deterioration in
public services?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1 and r13pad11_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong improvement |
20 |
2.7% |
0.026954178 |
| 2 |
Strong improvement |
62 |
8.4% |
0.083557951 |
| 3 |
Some improvement |
180 |
24.3% |
0.242587601 |
| 4 |
Neither an improvement or deterioration |
148 |
19.9% |
0.199460916 |
| 5 |
Some deterioration |
204 |
27.5% |
0.274932615 |
| 6 |
Strong deterioration |
93 |
12.5% |
0.125336927 |
| 7 |
Very strong deterioration |
30 |
4.0% |
0.040431267 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.7% |
0.006738544 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6467 |
|
NA |
r13pad11b
|
Variable label:
|
Improvement or deterioration, with examples: Automatization of public
services.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
A growing trend is that public agencies entrust decisions to
computers instead of giving the task to human beings. The computers make
the decisions in accordance with a predetermined sequence (a so-called
algorithm) that is determined by humans, but once it has been set, a
computer makes its own decisions. One specific example from Norway is
the Directorate of Immigration (UDI), which in certain cases lets the
robot Ada decide whether to grant individuals residence in Norway. A
couple of examples from the USA are algorithms that produce
recommendations regarding where police should patrol in order to
increase the chance of catching criminals, as well as which concerns
child welfare services should take seriously and which they can let
pass.
We are interested in investigating what Norwegians think about this
technological development.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, do you think the shift from human to automated
decisions will in general lead to an improvement or deterioration in
public services?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1 and r13pad11_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong improvement |
12 |
1.7% |
0.01724138 |
| 2 |
Strong improvement |
45 |
6.5% |
0.06465517 |
| 3 |
Some improvement |
175 |
25.1% |
0.25143678 |
| 4 |
Neither an improvement or deterioration |
137 |
19.7% |
0.19683908 |
| 5 |
Some deterioration |
156 |
22.4% |
0.22413793 |
| 6 |
Strong deterioration |
118 |
17.0% |
0.16954023 |
| 7 |
Very strong deterioration |
47 |
6.8% |
0.06752874 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.9% |
0.00862069 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6513 |
|
NA |
r13pad12
|
Variable label:
|
Reason [R13PAD11][Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you give the reasons for your answer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy
considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers
after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13pad13_1
|
Variable label:
|
Automatization of public services leads to what in: Verifiability.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What do you think a transition from human to automated decision making
in the public sector will lead to when it comes to the following points?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Verifiability: Opportunity for those affected by a decision to be given
an explanation for it
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very much greater |
53 |
3.6% |
0.03645117 |
| 2 |
Greater |
156 |
10.7% |
0.10729023 |
| 3 |
Somewhat greater |
217 |
14.9% |
0.14924347 |
| 4 |
Neither greater or less |
274 |
18.8% |
0.18844567 |
| 5 |
Somewhat less |
213 |
14.6% |
0.14649243 |
| 6 |
Less |
315 |
21.7% |
0.21664374 |
| 7 |
Very much less |
172 |
11.8% |
0.11829436 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
3.7% |
0.03713893 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13pad13_2
|
Variable label:
|
Automatization of public services leads to what in: Impartiality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What do you think a transition from human to automated decision making
in the public sector will lead to when it comes to the following points?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Impartiality: Opportunity for citizens to be treated equally by the
authorities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very much greater |
137 |
9.4% |
0.09422283 |
| 2 |
Greater |
360 |
24.8% |
0.24759285 |
| 3 |
Somewhat greater |
429 |
29.5% |
0.29504814 |
| 4 |
Neither greater or less |
279 |
19.2% |
0.19188446 |
| 5 |
Somewhat less |
77 |
5.3% |
0.05295736 |
| 6 |
Less |
76 |
5.2% |
0.05226960 |
| 7 |
Very much less |
39 |
2.7% |
0.02682256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
3.9% |
0.03920220 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13pad13_3
|
Variable label:
|
Automatization of public services leads to what in: Legitimacy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What do you think a transition from human to automated decision making
in the public sector will lead to when it comes to the following points?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Legitimacy: The probability that citizens comply voluntarily with the
decisions of the authorities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very much greater |
23 |
1.6% |
0.01581843 |
| 2 |
Greater |
79 |
5.4% |
0.05433287 |
| 3 |
Somewhat greater |
188 |
12.9% |
0.12929849 |
| 4 |
Neither greater or less |
582 |
40.0% |
0.40027510 |
| 5 |
Somewhat less |
255 |
17.5% |
0.17537827 |
| 6 |
Less |
196 |
13.5% |
0.13480055 |
| 7 |
Very much less |
72 |
5.0% |
0.04951857 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
4.1% |
0.04057772 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13pad14
|
Variable label:
|
How much knowledge about automated decisions in public sector.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much knowledge would you say that you have about automated decisions
in the public sector?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good knowledge |
17 |
1.2% |
0.01169188 |
| 2 |
Good knowledge |
94 |
6.5% |
0.06464924 |
| 3 |
Some knowledge |
375 |
25.8% |
0.25790922 |
| 4 |
Little knowledge |
640 |
44.0% |
0.44016506 |
| 5 |
No knowledge at all |
295 |
20.3% |
0.20288858 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.3% |
0.02269601 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13polkom5
|
Variable label:
|
Reason for why one person is more credible than the other [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please give reasons for why you think one person is more credible than
the other.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3, r13polkom2 = 1 and response on r13polkom4][Text
data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However,
data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13polkom5_back
|
Variable label:
|
[Logs movement backward in the questionnaire, from r13polkom5 to
r13polkom 4.. Tracks if r13group = 3, r13polkom2 = 1 and response on
r13polkom4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Logs movement backward in the questionnaire, from r13polkom5 to
r13polkom 4.. Tracks if r13group = 3, r13polkom2 = 1 and response on
r13polkom4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:201] [Invalid:7008]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has used return button to go back to R13POLKOM4 |
201 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7008 |
|
NA |
r13meme3_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme3. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme3. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1342] [Invalid:5867]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
your local community |
442 |
32.9% |
0.3293592 |
| 2 |
your municipality |
459 |
34.2% |
0.3420268 |
| 3 |
Norway |
441 |
32.9% |
0.3286140 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5867 |
|
NA |
r13meme3
|
Variable label:
|
How is the integration of refugees in [your local
community/municipality/Norway] going.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think that the integration of refugees who are residing in
[your local community/your municipality/Norway] is going?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02335766 |
| 2 |
Well |
438 |
32.0% |
0.31970803 |
| 3 |
Quite well |
423 |
30.9% |
0.30875912 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
150 |
10.9% |
0.10948905 |
| 5 |
Quite badly |
163 |
11.9% |
0.11897810 |
| 6 |
Badly |
93 |
6.8% |
0.06788321 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
36 |
2.6% |
0.02627737 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
2.6% |
0.02554745 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme4_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme4. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme4. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:5869]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
national |
662 |
49.4% |
0.4940299 |
| 2 |
local |
678 |
50.6% |
0.5059701 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5869 |
|
NA |
r13meme4
|
Variable label:
|
How good/bad did [local/national] authorities handle arrival of refugees
to Norway in 2015.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How well or poorly do you think [national/local] authorities handled the
arrival of refugees in Norway in 2015?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
25 |
1.8% |
0.01824818 |
| 2 |
Well |
196 |
14.3% |
0.14306569 |
| 3 |
Quite well |
336 |
24.5% |
0.24525547 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
239 |
17.4% |
0.17445255 |
| 5 |
Quite badly |
293 |
21.4% |
0.21386861 |
| 6 |
Badly |
164 |
12.0% |
0.11970803 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
69 |
5.0% |
0.05036496 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
3.5% |
0.03503650 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme5_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme5. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme5. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1339] [Invalid:5870]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in your municipality |
645 |
48.2% |
0.4817028 |
| 2 |
in Norway |
694 |
51.8% |
0.5182972 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5870 |
|
NA |
r13meme5
|
Variable label:
|
How much say did representatives in [your municipality/Norway] have on
amount of refugees coming to [municipality/Norway].
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much say do you think elected representatives [in your
municipality/in Norway] have had on the number of refugees who have come
[to the municipality/to Norway]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A great deal |
143 |
10.4% |
0.10437956 |
| 2 |
Quite a bit |
459 |
33.5% |
0.33503650 |
| 3 |
Some |
446 |
32.6% |
0.32554745 |
| 4 |
Not much |
238 |
17.4% |
0.17372263 |
| 5 |
None at all |
41 |
3.0% |
0.02992701 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
3.1% |
0.03138686 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme6_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme6. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme6. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1338] [Invalid:5871]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian authorities / municipalities |
638 |
47.7% |
0.4768311 |
| 2 |
UN / Parliament |
700 |
52.3% |
0.5231689 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5871 |
|
NA |
r13meme6
|
Variable label:
|
Representatives in [your municipality/Norway] should accept how many
refugees.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The [Norwegian authorities/UN] request each year that
[municipalities/Norway] accept refugees.
[The Municipal Council/Parliament] do not have to comply with the
request, but can decide themselves how many refugees [the
municipality/Norway] will take.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think that the elected representatives [in your
municipality/Norway] should do?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
More than we are asked |
180 |
13.1% |
0.13138686 |
| 2 |
As many as we are asked |
777 |
56.7% |
0.56715328 |
| 3 |
Fewer than we are asked |
310 |
22.6% |
0.22627737 |
| 4 |
None at all |
62 |
4.5% |
0.04525547 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
3.0% |
0.02992701 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme10_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme10a, r13meme10b and
r13meme10c.. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme10a, r13meme10b and
r13meme10c.. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1337] [Invalid:5872]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway |
450 |
33.7% |
0.3365744 |
| 2 |
your municipality |
447 |
33.4% |
0.3343306 |
| 3 |
your local community |
440 |
32.9% |
0.3290950 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5872 |
|
NA |
r13meme10a
|
Variable label:
|
How much are issues of refugees and immigration discussed in
[Norway/your municipality/your local community] these days.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say that issues relating to refugees and immigration
are discussed in [Norway/your municipality/your local community] these
days?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very little |
239 |
17.4% |
0.17445255 |
| 2 |
A little |
459 |
33.5% |
0.33503650 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
411 |
30.0% |
0.30000000 |
| 4 |
Quite a bit |
171 |
12.5% |
0.12481752 |
| 5 |
Very much |
47 |
3.4% |
0.03430657 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
3.1% |
0.03138686 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme10b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Discussions on refugees and immigration in [Norway/municipality/local
community] are: Calm-heated.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you characterise the discussions about refugees and
immigration in [Norway/your municipality/ your local community]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Calm |
201 |
14.7% |
0.14671533 |
| 7 |
Heated |
27 |
2.0% |
0.01970803 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
102 |
7.4% |
0.07445255 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
| 2 |
|
237 |
17.3% |
0.17299270 |
| 3 |
|
225 |
16.4% |
0.16423358 |
| 4 |
|
286 |
20.9% |
0.20875912 |
| 5 |
|
193 |
14.1% |
0.14087591 |
| 6 |
|
99 |
7.2% |
0.07226277 |
r13meme10b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Discussions on refugees and immigration in [Norway/municipality/local
community] are: Objective-non-objective.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you characterise the discussions about refugees and
immigration in [Norway/your municipality/ your local community]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Objective |
127 |
9.3% |
0.09270073 |
| 7 |
Non-objective |
28 |
2.0% |
0.02043796 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
103 |
7.5% |
0.07518248 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
| 2 |
|
214 |
15.6% |
0.15620438 |
| 3 |
|
267 |
19.5% |
0.19489051 |
| 4 |
|
300 |
21.9% |
0.21897810 |
| 5 |
|
231 |
16.9% |
0.16861314 |
| 6 |
|
100 |
7.3% |
0.07299270 |
r13meme10b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Discussions on refugees and immigration in [Norway/municipality/local
community] are: A source of conflict-Solution oriented.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you characterise the discussions about refugees and
immigration in [Norway/your municipality/ your local community]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Solution oriented |
81 |
5.9% |
0.05912409 |
| 7 |
A source of conflict |
44 |
3.2% |
0.03211679 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
114 |
8.3% |
0.08321168 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
| 2 |
|
155 |
11.3% |
0.11313869 |
| 3 |
|
259 |
18.9% |
0.18905109 |
| 4 |
|
362 |
26.4% |
0.26423358 |
| 5 |
|
237 |
17.3% |
0.17299270 |
| 6 |
|
118 |
8.6% |
0.08613139 |
r13meme10b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Diiscussions on refugees and immigration in [Norway/municipality/local
community] are: Interesting-Boring.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you characterise the discussions about refugees and
immigration in [Norway/your municipality/ your local community]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Interesting |
26 |
1.9% |
0.01897810 |
| 7 |
Boring |
65 |
4.7% |
0.04744526 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
128 |
9.3% |
0.09343066 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
| 2 |
|
91 |
6.6% |
0.06642336 |
| 3 |
|
200 |
14.6% |
0.14598540 |
| 4 |
|
557 |
40.7% |
0.40656934 |
| 5 |
|
204 |
14.9% |
0.14890511 |
| 6 |
|
99 |
7.2% |
0.07226277 |
r13meme10c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Get information about refugees/immigration in [Norway/municipality/local
community]: 1. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you get information about refugees and immigration in
[Norway/your municipality/your local community]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please reply in the text boxes below. Examples of answers can be family,
friends, TV, social media, local newspapers, research etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy
considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers
after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13meme10c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Get information about refugees/immigration in [Norway/municipality/local
community]: 2. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you get information about refugees and immigration in
[Norway/your municipality/your local community]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please reply in the text boxes below. Examples of answers can be family,
friends, TV, social media, local newspapers, research etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy
considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers
after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13meme10c_3
|
Variable label:
|
Get information about refugees/immigration in [Norway/municipality/local
community]: 3. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you get information about refugees and immigration in
[Norway/your municipality/your local community]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please reply in the text boxes below. Examples of answers can be family,
friends, TV, social media, local newspapers, research etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy
considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers
after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13meme2
|
Variable label:
|
Refugees live in your loal community.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do refugees reside in your local community?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
889 |
64.9% |
0.64890511 |
| 2 |
No |
212 |
15.5% |
0.15474453 |
| 3 |
Do not know |
227 |
16.6% |
0.16569343 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
3.1% |
0.03065693 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_organisasjon
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects an
organisation in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3
or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects an
organisation in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3
or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
An organisation |
915 |
21.5% |
0.2148392 |
| 2 |
An organisation associated with a connection to a foreign country. |
786 |
18.5% |
0.1845504 |
| 3 |
A political party that is in government. |
855 |
20.1% |
0.2007514 |
| 4 |
A political party that has registered to participate in elections. |
868 |
20.4% |
0.2038037 |
| 5 |
A political party that actively participates in elections. |
835 |
19.6% |
0.1960554 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_event
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the event
in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the event
in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
speech |
1410 |
33.1% |
0.3310636 |
| 2 |
stand |
1412 |
33.2% |
0.3315332 |
| 3 |
demonstration |
1437 |
33.7% |
0.3374031 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_sted
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
location in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or
4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
location in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or
4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
a local event |
1424 |
33.4% |
0.3343508 |
| 2 |
an upper secondary school |
1392 |
32.7% |
0.3268373 |
| 3 |
a known public space |
1443 |
33.9% |
0.3388119 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_budskap
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
message in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
message in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or
4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway needs a more rigorous asylum policy. |
1471 |
34.5% |
0.3453862 |
| 2 |
Islam poses a serious threat to democratic values and the rights of women and
homosexuals. |
1346 |
31.6% |
0.3160366 |
| 3 |
Norway must preserve its white cultural heritage |
1442 |
33.9% |
0.3385771 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_arv
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
heritage of the organsation in the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if
r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the
heritage of the organsation in the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes
if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
They were founded as a neo-Nazi organisation |
1393 |
32.7% |
0.3270721 |
| 2 |
They were founded as a revolt against asylum policy. |
1432 |
33.6% |
0.3362292 |
| 3 |
They were founded through revolt at district level in several parts of the
country. |
1434 |
33.7% |
0.3366988 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_benekter
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects if the
organisation denies right wing extremism in the hypothetical situation.
Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects if the
organisation denies right wing extremism in the hypothetical situation..
Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
They currently distance themselves from anything to do with right-wing extremism |
2054 |
48.2% |
0.4822728 |
| 2 |
. |
2205 |
51.8% |
0.5177272 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_motbevis
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
characteristics of some members in organisation in the hypothetical
situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects
characteristics of some members in organisation in the hypothetical
situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
- It turns out that [the organisation/the party] has a key member who has been
convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the
organisation/the party]. |
1483 |
34.8% |
0.3482038 |
| 2 |
- It turns out that [the organisation/the party] has a key member who has been
convicted of making racist statements. |
1365 |
32.0% |
0.3204978 |
| 3 |
- It turns out that [the organisation/the party] has some members who deny the
Holocaust. |
1411 |
33.1% |
0.3312984 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9a
|
Variable label:
|
Organisation should be given permission to hold event.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine [An organisation. / An organisation associated with a connection
to a foreign country. / A political party that is in government. / A
political party that has registered to participate in elections. /A
political party that actively participates in elections. ][They were
founded as a neo-Nazi organisation. / They were founded as a revolt
against asylum policy./ They were founded through revolt at district
level in several parts of the country.] [They currently distance
themselves from anything to do with right-wing extremism./blank][It
turns out that [the organization/the party] has a key member who has
been convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced
to leave [the organization/the party]. /It turns out that [the
organization/the party] has a key member who has been convicted of
making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the
organization/the party]./ It turns out that [the organization/the party]
has some members who deny the Holocaust.] [The organization/The party]
has now asked if they can have a [speech/stand/demonstration] at [a
local event/an upper secondary school/a known public place] in order to
communicate their message that [Norway needs a more rigorous asylum
policy/Islam poses a serious threat to democratic values and the rights
of women and homosexuals/Norway must preserve its white cultural
heritage].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be given
permission to do so?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical
situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See
background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
405 |
9.2% |
0.09236032 |
| 2 |
Agree |
879 |
20.0% |
0.20045610 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
688 |
15.7% |
0.15689852 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
380 |
8.7% |
0.08665906 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
408 |
9.3% |
0.09304447 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
741 |
16.9% |
0.16898518 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
720 |
16.4% |
0.16419612 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
164 |
3.7% |
0.03740023 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2824 |
|
NA |
r13meme9b
|
Variable label:
|
Organisation poses a threat to democracy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine [An organisation. / An organisation associated with a connection
to a foreign country. / A political party that is in government. / A
political party that has registered to participate in elections. /A
political party that actively participates in elections. ][They were
founded as a neo-Nazi organisation. / They were founded as a revolt
against asylum policy./ They were founded through revolt at district
level in several parts of the country.] [They currently distance
themselves from anything to do with right-wing extremism./blank][It
turns out that [the organization/the party] has a key member who has
been convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced
to leave [the organization/the party]. /It turns out that [the
organization/the party] has a key member who has been convicted of
making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the
organization/the party]./ It turns out that [the organization/the party]
has some members who deny the Holocaust.] [The organization/The party]
has now asked if they can have a [speech/stand/demonstration] at [a
local event/an upper secondary school/a known public place] in order to
communicate their message that [Norway needs a more rigorous asylum
policy/Islam poses a serious threat to democratic values and the rights
of women and homosexuals/Norway must preserve its white cultural
heritage].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that the organisation described
above poses a threat to democracy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Del av conjoint-eksperiment. En tenkt situasjon presenteres for
respondenten. Den tenkte situasjonen har ulike egenskaper basert på
bakgrunnsvariablene r13meme9_event - r13meme9_motbevis. Spurt dersom
r13group = 2, 3 eller 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
454 |
10.4% |
0.10353478 |
| 2 |
Agree |
728 |
16.6% |
0.16602052 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
812 |
18.5% |
0.18517674 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
715 |
16.3% |
0.16305587 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
481 |
11.0% |
0.10969213 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
743 |
16.9% |
0.16944128 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
282 |
6.4% |
0.06431015 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
170 |
3.9% |
0.03876853 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2824 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_1
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Contempt.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings
about the elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Contempt
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
702 |
51.2% |
0.512408759 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
410 |
29.9% |
0.299270073 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
127 |
9.3% |
0.092700730 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
16 |
1.2% |
0.011678832 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
114 |
8.3% |
0.083211679 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_2
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Admiration.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings
about the elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
58 |
4.2% |
0.04233577 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
310 |
22.6% |
0.22627737 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
602 |
43.9% |
0.43941606 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
250 |
18.2% |
0.18248175 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
43 |
3.1% |
0.03138686 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
107 |
7.8% |
0.07810219 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_3
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Compassion.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings
about the elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
37 |
2.7% |
0.02700730 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
162 |
11.8% |
0.11824818 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
605 |
44.2% |
0.44160584 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
387 |
28.2% |
0.28248175 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
81 |
5.9% |
0.05912409 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
98 |
7.2% |
0.07153285 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_4
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Envy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings
about the elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
514 |
37.5% |
0.375182482 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
488 |
35.6% |
0.356204380 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
233 |
17.0% |
0.170072993 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
21 |
1.5% |
0.015328467 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001459854 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
112 |
8.2% |
0.081751825 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_5
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Anger.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings
about the elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
696 |
50.8% |
0.508029197 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
422 |
30.8% |
0.308029197 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
117 |
8.5% |
0.085401460 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
18 |
1.3% |
0.013138686 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002189781 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
114 |
8.3% |
0.083211679 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_6
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Fear.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings
about the elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
810 |
59.1% |
0.591240876 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
343 |
25.0% |
0.250364964 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
83 |
6.1% |
0.060583942 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008759124 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003649635 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
117 |
8.5% |
0.085401460 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_7
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Feel sorry for
them.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings
about the elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for them
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
88 |
6.4% |
0.06423358 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
276 |
20.1% |
0.20145985 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
645 |
47.1% |
0.47080292 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
200 |
14.6% |
0.14598540 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
50 |
3.6% |
0.03649635 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
111 |
8.1% |
0.08102190 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_1
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Contempt.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Contempt
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
1133 |
82.7% |
0.827007299 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
101 |
7.4% |
0.073722628 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
26 |
1.9% |
0.018978102 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005839416 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004379562 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
96 |
7.0% |
0.070072993 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_2
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Admiration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
59 |
4.3% |
0.04306569 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
121 |
8.8% |
0.08832117 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
499 |
36.4% |
0.36423358 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
461 |
33.6% |
0.33649635 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
149 |
10.9% |
0.10875912 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
5.9% |
0.05912409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_3
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Compassion
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
52 |
3.8% |
0.03795620 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
118 |
8.6% |
0.08613139 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
466 |
34.0% |
0.34014599 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
473 |
34.5% |
0.34525547 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
171 |
12.5% |
0.12481752 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
6.6% |
0.06569343 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_4
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Envy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
987 |
72.0% |
0.720437956 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
219 |
16.0% |
0.159854015 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
52 |
3.8% |
0.037956204 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
15 |
1.1% |
0.010948905 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005109489 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
6.6% |
0.065693431 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_5
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
1068 |
78.0% |
0.779562044 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
147 |
10.7% |
0.107299270 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
51 |
3.7% |
0.037226277 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006569343 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004379562 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
6.5% |
0.064963504 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_6
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Fear
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
1112 |
81.2% |
0.811678832 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
119 |
8.7% |
0.086861314 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
35 |
2.6% |
0.025547445 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008029197 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002189781 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
6.6% |
0.065693431 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_7
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Feel sorry for them
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
elderly as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for them
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
159 |
11.6% |
0.11605839 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
330 |
24.1% |
0.24087591 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
580 |
42.3% |
0.42335766 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
157 |
11.5% |
0.11459854 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
57 |
4.2% |
0.04160584 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
6.4% |
0.06350365 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme7a_1
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Contempt.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Contempt
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and
r6dv12bB]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
174 |
7.9% |
0.078911565 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
681 |
30.9% |
0.308843537 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
1010 |
45.8% |
0.458049887 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
148 |
6.7% |
0.067120181 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
20 |
0.9% |
0.009070295 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
172 |
7.8% |
0.078004535 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7a_2
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Admiration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and
r6dv12bB]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
407 |
18.5% |
0.1845804989 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
1025 |
46.5% |
0.4648526077 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
555 |
25.2% |
0.2517006803 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
40 |
1.8% |
0.0181405896 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009070295 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
176 |
8.0% |
0.0798185941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7a_3
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Compassion
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and
r6dv12bB]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
47 |
2.1% |
0.02131519 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
256 |
11.6% |
0.11609977 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
1181 |
53.6% |
0.53560091 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
526 |
23.9% |
0.23854875 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
41 |
1.9% |
0.01859410 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
154 |
7.0% |
0.06984127 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7a_4
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Envy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and
r6dv12bB]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
1027 |
46.6% |
0.465759637 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
596 |
27.0% |
0.270294785 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
338 |
15.3% |
0.153287982 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
61 |
2.8% |
0.027664399 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003174603 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
176 |
8.0% |
0.079818594 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7a_5
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and
r6dv12bB]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
211 |
9.6% |
0.09569161 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
632 |
28.7% |
0.28662132 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
951 |
43.1% |
0.43129252 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
209 |
9.5% |
0.09478458 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
29 |
1.3% |
0.01315193 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
173 |
7.8% |
0.07845805 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7a_6
|
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Fear
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about
asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings
about asylum seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and
r6dv12bB]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
91 |
4.1% |
0.04126984 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
326 |
14.8% |
0.14784580 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
1055 |
47.8% |
0.47845805 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
464 |
21.0% |
0.21043084 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
100 |
4.5% |
0.04535147 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
169 |
7.7% |
0.07664399 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7b_1
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Contempt.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Contempt.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and
r6dv12bB]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
1255 |
56.9% |
0.569160998 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
562 |
25.5% |
0.254875283 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
217 |
9.8% |
0.098412698 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
32 |
1.5% |
0.014512472 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004988662 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
128 |
5.8% |
0.058049887 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7b_2
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Admiration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and
r6dv12bB]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
407 |
18.5% |
0.18458050 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
624 |
28.3% |
0.28299320 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
797 |
36.1% |
0.36145125 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
219 |
9.9% |
0.09931973 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
25 |
1.1% |
0.01133787 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
133 |
6.0% |
0.06031746 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7b_3
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Compassion
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and
r6dv12bB]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
68 |
3.1% |
0.03083900 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
176 |
8.0% |
0.07981859 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
803 |
36.4% |
0.36417234 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
837 |
38.0% |
0.37959184 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
210 |
9.5% |
0.09523810 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
111 |
5.0% |
0.05034014 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7b_4
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Envy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and
r6dv12bB]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
1786 |
81.0% |
0.8099773243 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
230 |
10.4% |
0.1043083900 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
42 |
1.9% |
0.0190476190 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
15 |
0.7% |
0.0068027211 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009070295 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
130 |
5.9% |
0.0589569161 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7b_5
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and
r6dv12bB]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
1372 |
62.2% |
0.622222222 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
478 |
21.7% |
0.216780045 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
171 |
7.8% |
0.077551020 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
38 |
1.7% |
0.017233560 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
16 |
0.7% |
0.007256236 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
130 |
5.9% |
0.058956916 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7b_6
|
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Fear
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and
r6dv12bB]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
717 |
32.5% |
0.32517007 |
| 2 |
To a small degree |
807 |
36.6% |
0.36598639 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
417 |
18.9% |
0.18911565 |
| 4 |
To a great degree |
101 |
4.6% |
0.04580499 |
| 5 |
To a very great degree |
36 |
1.6% |
0.01632653 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
127 |
5.8% |
0.05759637 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme11_1
|
Variable label:
|
How good or poor description of you: Important to be unprejudiced in
regard to immigrants.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to
immigrants
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if no response on r13meme5 and if the respondent was asked
r13meme8 or r13meme7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
571 |
22.2% |
0.22191994 |
| 2 |
Good |
941 |
36.6% |
0.36572095 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
440 |
17.1% |
0.17100661 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
395 |
15.4% |
0.15351729 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
89 |
3.5% |
0.03458997 |
| 6 |
Bad |
54 |
2.1% |
0.02098717 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
35 |
1.4% |
0.01360280 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
1.9% |
0.01865527 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4636 |
|
NA |
r13meme11_2
|
Variable label:
|
How good or poor description of you: Do not want to appear racist, even
to myself.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if no response on r13meme5 and if the respondent was asked
r13meme8 or r13meme7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
744 |
28.9% |
0.28915663 |
| 2 |
Good |
849 |
33.0% |
0.32996502 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
309 |
12.0% |
0.12009328 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
394 |
15.3% |
0.15312864 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
108 |
4.2% |
0.04197435 |
| 6 |
Bad |
66 |
2.6% |
0.02565099 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
47 |
1.8% |
0.01826661 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
2.2% |
0.02176448 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4636 |
|
NA |
r13meme11_3
|
Variable label:
|
How good or poor description of you: Feel guilty if I think negatively
about immigrants.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if no response on r13meme5 and if the respondent was asked
r13meme8 or r13meme7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
181 |
7.0% |
0.07034590 |
| 2 |
Good |
442 |
17.2% |
0.17178391 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
421 |
16.4% |
0.16362223 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
727 |
28.3% |
0.28254955 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
237 |
9.2% |
0.09211038 |
| 6 |
Bad |
317 |
12.3% |
0.12320249 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
185 |
7.2% |
0.07190051 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
2.4% |
0.02448504 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4636 |
|
NA |
r13meme11_4
|
Variable label:
|
How good or poor description of you: Try to be unprejudiced about
immigrants due to my own convictions.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants due to my own
convictions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if no response on r13meme5 and if the respondent was asked
r13meme8 or r13meme7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
519 |
20.2% |
0.20171007 |
| 2 |
Good |
985 |
38.3% |
0.38282161 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
433 |
16.8% |
0.16828605 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
398 |
15.5% |
0.15468325 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
86 |
3.3% |
0.03342402 |
| 6 |
Bad |
58 |
2.3% |
0.02254178 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
36 |
1.4% |
0.01399145 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
2.3% |
0.02254178 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4636 |
|
NA |
ocr13mat_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[If value on r7ran24 it is used. If not, a random value is selected. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If value on r7ran24 it is used. If not, a random value is selected. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6980] [Invalid:229]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
1173 |
16.8% |
0.1680516 |
| 2 |
2 |
1197 |
17.1% |
0.1714900 |
| 3 |
3 |
1124 |
16.1% |
0.1610315 |
| 4 |
4 |
1192 |
17.1% |
0.1707736 |
| 5 |
5 |
1167 |
16.7% |
0.1671920 |
| 6 |
6 |
1127 |
16.1% |
0.1614613 |
| Sysmiss |
|
229 |
|
NA |
ocr13mat_ran_1
|
Variable label:
|
[If value on r7ran24_1 it is used. If not, a random value is selected if
ocr13mat_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If value on r7ran24_1 it is used. If not, a random value is selected if
ocr13mat_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1173] [Invalid:6036]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
389 |
33.2% |
0.3316283 |
| 2 |
2 |
394 |
33.6% |
0.3358909 |
| 3 |
3 |
390 |
33.2% |
0.3324808 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6036 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of three statements: Assistance to poor,
petrol/diesel tax, pollution.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree
with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
59 |
15.2% |
0.151670951 |
| 2 |
1 |
239 |
61.4% |
0.614395887 |
| 3 |
2 |
85 |
21.9% |
0.218508997 |
| 4 |
3 |
4 |
1.0% |
0.010282776 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005141388 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6820 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc1a
|
Variable label:
|
Norway should let people from Muslim countries come and live here.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think Norway should allow people from Muslim countries to come
and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
allow to come and live here |
249 |
64.0% |
0.64010283 |
| 2 |
do not allow to come and live here |
121 |
31.1% |
0.31105398 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
4.9% |
0.04884319 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6820 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of three statements: Assistance to poor,
petrol/diesel tax, pollution.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree
with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
183 |
15.3% |
0.152882206 |
| 2 |
1 |
733 |
61.2% |
0.612364244 |
| 3 |
2 |
266 |
22.2% |
0.222222222 |
| 4 |
3 |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006683375 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.005847953 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6012 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc2a
|
Variable label:
|
Norway should let people from Easter European countries come and live
here.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think Norway should allow people from Eastern European countries
to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
allow to come and live here |
746 |
62.3% |
0.62322473 |
| 2 |
do not allow to come and live here |
400 |
33.4% |
0.33416876 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
4.3% |
0.04260652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6012 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of three statements: Assistance to poor,
petrol/diesel tax, pollution.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree
with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
67 |
17.0% |
0.170050761 |
| 2 |
1 |
242 |
61.4% |
0.614213198 |
| 3 |
2 |
77 |
19.5% |
0.195431472 |
| 4 |
3 |
6 |
1.5% |
0.015228426 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005076142 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6815 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc3a
|
Variable label:
|
Norway should let immigrants from Muslim countries come and live here.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think Norway should allow immigrants from Muslim countries to
come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
allow to come and live here |
261 |
66.2% |
0.66243655 |
| 2 |
do not allow to come and live here |
114 |
28.9% |
0.28934010 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
4.8% |
0.04822335 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6815 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of three statements: Assistance to poor,
petrol/diesel tax, pollution.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree
with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
75 |
19.2% |
0.192307692 |
| 2 |
1 |
229 |
58.7% |
0.587179487 |
| 3 |
2 |
82 |
21.0% |
0.210256410 |
| 4 |
3 |
3 |
0.8% |
0.007692308 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.3% |
0.002564103 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6819 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc4a
|
Variable label:
|
Norway should let refugees from muslim countries come and live here.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think Norway should allow refugees from Muslim countries to come
and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
allow to come and live here |
262 |
67.2% |
0.67179487 |
| 2 |
do not allow to come and live here |
112 |
28.7% |
0.28717949 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
4.1% |
0.04102564 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6819 |
|
NA |
ocr13matt1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of four statements: Assistance to poor,
petrol/diesel tax, pollution, people from Muslim countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with?
We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment Norway should allow people from Muslim countries
to come and live here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
100 |
8.9% |
0.088967972 |
| 2 |
1 |
377 |
33.5% |
0.335409253 |
| 3 |
2 |
530 |
47.2% |
0.471530249 |
| 4 |
3 |
97 |
8.6% |
0.086298932 |
| 5 |
4 |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008896797 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008896797 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6085 |
|
NA |
ocr13matt2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of four statements: Assistance to poor,
petrol/diesel tax, pollution, people from Eastern Europe.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with?
We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment Norway should allow people from Eastern European
countries to come and live here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
108 |
9.1% |
0.090604027 |
| 2 |
1 |
498 |
41.8% |
0.417785235 |
| 3 |
2 |
505 |
42.4% |
0.423657718 |
| 4 |
3 |
63 |
5.3% |
0.052852349 |
| 5 |
4 |
12 |
1.0% |
0.010067114 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005033557 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6017 |
|
NA |
ocr13matt3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of four statements: Assistance to poor,
petrol/diesel tax, pollution, immigrants from Muslim countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with?
We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment Norway should allow immigrants from Muslim
countries to come and live here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
108 |
9.3% |
0.092544987 |
| 2 |
1 |
429 |
36.8% |
0.367609254 |
| 3 |
2 |
527 |
45.2% |
0.451585261 |
| 4 |
3 |
92 |
7.9% |
0.078834619 |
| 5 |
4 |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005141388 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004284490 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6042 |
|
NA |
ocr13matt4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of four statements: Assistance to poor,
petrol/diesel tax, pollution, refugees from Muslim countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with?
We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment Norway should allow refugees from Muslim
countries to come and live here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
72 |
6.4% |
0.063886424 |
| 2 |
1 |
364 |
32.3% |
0.322981366 |
| 3 |
2 |
578 |
51.3% |
0.512866016 |
| 4 |
3 |
92 |
8.2% |
0.081632653 |
| 5 |
4 |
12 |
1.1% |
0.010647737 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007985803 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6082 |
|
NA |
r13polkom1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which values are important for Norwegian society and identity
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics and in the news there has been a lot of writing and
discussion about Norwegian values. We are interested in your opinions on
what Norwegian values are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What values do you think are most important for Norwegian society and
identity?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Type key words.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r13polkom14_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects between r13polkom14a-c, and then
r13polkom14a-c. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects between r13polkom14a-c, and then
r13polkom14a-c. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1321] [Invalid:5888]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
satisfied |
442 |
33.5% |
0.334595 |
| 2 |
pleased |
440 |
33.3% |
0.333081 |
| 3 |
enthusiastic |
439 |
33.2% |
0.332324 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5888 |
|
NA |
r13polkom14a
|
Variable label:
|
The way democracy works in Norway: How satisfied.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy
works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
69 |
15.6% |
0.1561086 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
261 |
59.0% |
0.5904977 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
75 |
17.0% |
0.1696833 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
30 |
6.8% |
0.0678733 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
7 |
1.6% |
0.0158371 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6767 |
|
NA |
r13polkom14b
|
Variable label:
|
The way democracy works in Norway: How pleased.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how pleased are you with the way democracy works
in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very pleased |
62 |
14.1% |
0.140909091 |
| 2 |
Pleased |
227 |
51.6% |
0.515909091 |
| 3 |
Somewhat pleased |
109 |
24.8% |
0.247727273 |
| 4 |
Not very pleased |
35 |
8.0% |
0.079545455 |
| 5 |
Not pleased at all |
6 |
1.4% |
0.013636364 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002272727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r13polkom14c
|
Variable label:
|
The way democracy works in Norway: How enthusiastic.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how enthusiastic are you about the way democracy works in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very enthusiastic |
30 |
6.8% |
0.068337130 |
| 2 |
Enthusiastic |
204 |
46.5% |
0.464692483 |
| 3 |
Somewhat enthusiastic |
149 |
33.9% |
0.339407745 |
| 4 |
Not very enthusiastic |
38 |
8.7% |
0.086560364 |
| 5 |
Not at all enthusiastic |
17 |
3.9% |
0.038724374 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002277904 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6770 |
|
NA |
r13polkom15a
|
Variable label:
|
Your current personal financial situation: How satisfied.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with your current personal financial situation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
91 |
20.6% |
0.205882353 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
228 |
51.6% |
0.515837104 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
88 |
19.9% |
0.199095023 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
28 |
6.3% |
0.063348416 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
6 |
1.4% |
0.013574661 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002262443 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6767 |
|
NA |
r13polkom15b
|
Variable label:
|
Your current personal financial situation: How pleased.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How pleased are you with your current personal financial situation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very pleased |
73 |
16.6% |
0.165909091 |
| 2 |
Pleased |
242 |
55.0% |
0.550000000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat pleased |
87 |
19.8% |
0.197727273 |
| 4 |
Not very pleased |
20 |
4.5% |
0.045454545 |
| 5 |
Not pleased at all |
16 |
3.6% |
0.036363636 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004545455 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r13polkom15c
|
Variable label:
|
Your current personal financial situation: How enthusiastic.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How enthusiastic are you about your current personal financial
situation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very enthusiastic |
30 |
6.8% |
0.068337130 |
| 2 |
Enthusiastic |
148 |
33.7% |
0.337129841 |
| 3 |
Somewhat enthusiastic |
186 |
42.4% |
0.423690205 |
| 4 |
Not very enthusiastic |
58 |
13.2% |
0.132118451 |
| 5 |
Not at all enthusiastic |
16 |
3.6% |
0.036446469 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002277904 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6770 |
|
NA |
r13polkom16_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects between r13polkom16a-c. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects between r13polkom16a-c. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1321] [Invalid:5888]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
fortunate |
469 |
35.5% |
0.3550341 |
| 2 |
happy |
432 |
32.7% |
0.3270250 |
| 3 |
privileged |
420 |
31.8% |
0.3179410 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5888 |
|
NA |
r13polkom16a
|
Variable label:
|
How fortunate would you say you are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how fortunate would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom16_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very unfortunate |
5 |
1.1% |
0.010660981 |
| 2 |
Unfortunate |
3 |
0.6% |
0.006396588 |
| 3 |
Somewhat unfortunate |
20 |
4.3% |
0.042643923 |
| 4 |
Neither fortunate nor unfortunate |
38 |
8.1% |
0.081023454 |
| 5 |
Somewhat fortunate |
73 |
15.6% |
0.155650320 |
| 6 |
Fortunate |
196 |
41.8% |
0.417910448 |
| 7 |
Very fortunate |
133 |
28.4% |
0.283582090 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002132196 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6740 |
|
NA |
r13polkom16b
|
Variable label:
|
How happy would you say you are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how happy would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom16_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very unhappy |
6 |
1.4% |
0.013888889 |
| 2 |
Unhappy |
6 |
1.4% |
0.013888889 |
| 3 |
Somewhat unhappy |
14 |
3.2% |
0.032407407 |
| 4 |
Neither happy nor unhappy |
43 |
10.0% |
0.099537037 |
| 5 |
Somewhat happy |
101 |
23.4% |
0.233796296 |
| 6 |
Happy |
201 |
46.5% |
0.465277778 |
| 7 |
Very happy |
58 |
13.4% |
0.134259259 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.7% |
0.006944444 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6777 |
|
NA |
r13polkom16c
|
Variable label:
|
How privileged would you say you are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how privileged would you say you are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom16_ran = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very unprivileged |
10 |
2.4% |
0.023809524 |
| 2 |
Unprivileged |
8 |
1.9% |
0.019047619 |
| 3 |
Somewhat unprivileged |
17 |
4.0% |
0.040476190 |
| 4 |
Neither privileged or unprivileged |
39 |
9.3% |
0.092857143 |
| 5 |
Somewhat privileged |
88 |
21.0% |
0.209523810 |
| 6 |
Privileged |
165 |
39.3% |
0.392857143 |
| 7 |
Very privileged |
92 |
21.9% |
0.219047619 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002380952 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6789 |
|
NA |
r13pad10_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects between r13pad10a-d. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects between r13pad10a-d. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1422] [Invalid:5787]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent gets R13PAD10A |
357 |
25.1% |
0.2510549 |
| 2 |
Respondent gets R13PAD10B |
369 |
25.9% |
0.2594937 |
| 3 |
Respondent gets R13PAD10C |
340 |
23.9% |
0.2390999 |
| 4 |
Respondent gets R13PAD10D |
356 |
25.0% |
0.2503516 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5787 |
|
NA |
r13pad10a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Give amount of NOK if you are decision maker.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to
be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be
the recipient.
If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker, you will receive
NOK 2,000 KR and must choose how much you will give to the recipient.
What you give, the recipient will receive. You keep the rest.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you choose? I choose to give NOK:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:349] [Invalid:6860]
[Range:0-2000]
|
r13pad10b
|
Variable label:
|
Give money or refrain if you are decision maker.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to
be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be
the recipient.
If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker, you will receive
NOK 2,000 and must choose if you will give to the recipient, and if so
how much you will give. What you give, the recipient will receive. You
keep the rest. You can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In
this case, you keep your NOK 2,000 while the recipient gets nothing.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you choose?
I choose to:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Refrain from making a choice. |
80 |
21.7% |
0.21680217 |
| 2 |
Give NOK: |
284 |
77.0% |
0.76964770 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
1.4% |
0.01355014 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6840 |
|
NA |
r13pad10b_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Give amount of NOK if you are decision maker, can refrain
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to
be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be
the recipient.
If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker, you will receive
NOK 2,000 and must choose if you will give to the recipient, and if so
how much you will give. What you give, the recipient will receive. You
keep the rest. You can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In
this case, you keep your NOK 2,000 while the recipient gets nothing.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you choose?
I choose to: Give NOK…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:284] [Invalid:6925]
[Range:0-2000]
|
r13pad10c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Take amount of NOK if you are decision maker.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to
be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be
the recipient.
If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker, you must choose how
much you will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What
you do not take is kept by the recipient. What you take, you get.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you choose? I choose to take NOK:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:322] [Invalid:6887]
[Range:0-2000]
|
r13pad10d
|
Variable label:
|
Take money or refrain if you are decision maker.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to
be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be
the recipient.
If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker , you must choose if
you will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so
how much you will take. What you do not take is kept by the recipient.
What you take, you get. You can also choose to refrain from making a
choice. In this case you get nothing, while the receiver keeps their NOK
2,000.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you choose? I choose to:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Refrain from making a choice. |
166 |
46.6% |
0.46629213 |
| 2 |
Take NOK: |
183 |
51.4% |
0.51404494 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
2.0% |
0.01966292 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6853 |
|
NA |
r13pad10d_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Take amount of NOK if you are decision maker, can refrain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to
be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be
the recipient.
If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker , you must choose if
you will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so
how much you will take. What you do not take is kept by the recipient.
What you take, you get. You can also choose to refrain from making a
choice. In this case you get nothing, while the receiver keeps their NOK
2,000.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you choose?
I choose to: Take NOK …
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:180] [Invalid:7029]
[Range:0-2000]
|
r13pad9_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects between r13pad9a-d. Randomizes if r13group = 2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects between r13pad9a-d. Randomizes if r13group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1452] [Invalid:5757]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent gets R13PAD9A |
360 |
24.8% |
0.2479339 |
| 2 |
Respondent gets R13PAD9B |
366 |
25.2% |
0.2520661 |
| 3 |
Respondent gets R13PAD9C |
374 |
25.8% |
0.2575758 |
| 4 |
Respondent gets R13PAD9D |
352 |
24.2% |
0.2424242 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5757 |
|
NA |
r13pad9a_1
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 0
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she
will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient
will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing
(NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices
is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
|
|
Literal question:
|
0 NOK
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
231 |
64.2% |
0.64166667 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
37 |
10.3% |
0.10277778 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
11 |
3.1% |
0.03055556 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
12 |
3.3% |
0.03333333 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
69 |
19.2% |
0.19166667 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6849 |
|
NA |
r13pad9a_2
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 500
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she
will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient
will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing
(NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices
is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
|
|
Literal question:
|
500 NOK
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
75 |
20.8% |
0.20833333 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
125 |
34.7% |
0.34722222 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
74 |
20.6% |
0.20555556 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
17 |
4.7% |
0.04722222 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
69 |
19.2% |
0.19166667 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6849 |
|
NA |
r13pad9a_3
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 1000
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she
will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient
will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing
(NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices
is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
|
|
Literal question:
|
1000 NOK
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
16 |
4.4% |
0.04444444 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
15 |
4.2% |
0.04166667 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
82 |
22.8% |
0.22777778 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
204 |
56.7% |
0.56666667 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
11.9% |
0.11944444 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6849 |
|
NA |
r13pad9a_4
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 1500
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she
will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient
will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing
(NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices
is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
|
|
Literal question:
|
1500 NOK
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
30 |
8.3% |
0.08333333 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
44 |
12.2% |
0.12222222 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
115 |
31.9% |
0.31944444 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
100 |
27.8% |
0.27777778 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
19.7% |
0.19722222 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6849 |
|
NA |
r13pad9a_5
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 2000
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she
will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient
will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing
(NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices
is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
|
|
Literal question:
|
2000 NOK
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
55 |
15.3% |
0.1527778 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
45 |
12.5% |
0.1250000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
65 |
18.1% |
0.1805556 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
138 |
38.3% |
0.3833333 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
15.8% |
0.1583333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6849 |
|
NA |
r13pad9b_1
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to refrain from giving.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give
to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives,
the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing
(NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The
decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this
case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets
nothing.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are?
In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Refrain from taking a choice
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
107 |
29.2% |
0.29234973 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
76 |
20.8% |
0.20765027 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
57 |
15.6% |
0.15573770 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
23 |
6.3% |
0.06284153 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
103 |
28.1% |
0.28142077 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6843 |
|
NA |
r13pad9b_2
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 0, can refrain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give
to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives,
the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing
(NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The
decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this
case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets
nothing.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are?
In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give to the recipient: NOK 0
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
214 |
58.5% |
0.58469945 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
55 |
15.0% |
0.15027322 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
23 |
6.3% |
0.06284153 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
21 |
5.7% |
0.05737705 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
53 |
14.5% |
0.14480874 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6843 |
|
NA |
r13pad9b_3
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 500, can refrain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give
to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives,
the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing
(NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The
decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this
case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets
nothing.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are?
In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give to the recipient: NOK 500
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
60 |
16.4% |
0.16393443 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
155 |
42.3% |
0.42349727 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
72 |
19.7% |
0.19672131 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
27 |
7.4% |
0.07377049 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
14.2% |
0.14207650 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6843 |
|
NA |
r13pad9b_4
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 1000, can refrain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give
to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives,
the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing
(NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The
decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this
case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets
nothing.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are?
In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give to the recipient: NOK 1,000
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
11 |
3.0% |
0.03005464 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
26 |
7.1% |
0.07103825 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
81 |
22.1% |
0.22131148 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
216 |
59.0% |
0.59016393 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
8.7% |
0.08743169 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6843 |
|
NA |
r13pad9b_5
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 1500, can refrain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give
to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives,
the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing
(NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The
decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this
case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets
nothing.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are?
In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give to the recipient: NOK 1,500
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
22 |
6.0% |
0.06010929 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
64 |
17.5% |
0.17486339 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
120 |
32.8% |
0.32786885 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
105 |
28.7% |
0.28688525 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
15.0% |
0.15027322 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6843 |
|
NA |
r13pad9b_6
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 2000, can refrain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give
to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives,
the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing
(NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The
decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this
case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets
nothing.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are?
In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give to the recipient: NOK 2,000
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
46 |
12.6% |
0.1256831 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
64 |
17.5% |
0.1748634 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
82 |
22.4% |
0.2240437 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
119 |
32.5% |
0.3251366 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
15.0% |
0.1502732 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6843 |
|
NA |
r13pad9c_1
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 0
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK
2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take,
is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the
recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices
is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
|
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 0
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
41 |
11.0% |
0.10962567 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
19 |
5.1% |
0.05080214 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
40 |
10.7% |
0.10695187 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
237 |
63.4% |
0.63368984 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
9.9% |
0.09893048 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6835 |
|
NA |
r13pad9c_2
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 500
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK
2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take,
is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the
recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices
is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
|
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 500
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
60 |
16.0% |
0.1604278 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
48 |
12.8% |
0.1283422 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
138 |
36.9% |
0.3689840 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
84 |
22.5% |
0.2245989 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
11.8% |
0.1176471 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6835 |
|
NA |
r13pad9c_3
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 1000
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK
2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take,
is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the
recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices
is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
|
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 1,000
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
86 |
23.0% |
0.2299465 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
58 |
15.5% |
0.1550802 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
95 |
25.4% |
0.2540107 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
103 |
27.5% |
0.2754011 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
8.6% |
0.0855615 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6835 |
|
NA |
r13pad9c_4
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 1500
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK
2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take,
is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the
recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices
is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
|
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 1,500
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
206 |
55.1% |
0.55080214 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
90 |
24.1% |
0.24064171 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
19 |
5.1% |
0.05080214 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
8 |
2.1% |
0.02139037 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
13.6% |
0.13636364 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6835 |
|
NA |
r13pad9c_5
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 2000
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK
2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take,
is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the
recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices
is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
|
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 2,000
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
287 |
76.7% |
0.76737968 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
18 |
4.8% |
0.04812834 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
8 |
2.1% |
0.02139037 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
11 |
2.9% |
0.02941176 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
13.4% |
0.13368984 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6835 |
|
NA |
r13pad9d_1
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to refrain from taking.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000
the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker
does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the
recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The
decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this
case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their
NOK 2,000.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are?
In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Refrain from taking a choice
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
38 |
10.8% |
0.1079545 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
43 |
12.2% |
0.1221591 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
66 |
18.8% |
0.1875000 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
106 |
30.1% |
0.3011364 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
99 |
28.1% |
0.2812500 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6857 |
|
NA |
r13pad9d_2
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 0, can refrain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000
the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker
does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the
recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The
decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this
case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their
NOK 2,000.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make.
How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In
this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out. The decision maker chooses to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 0
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
38 |
10.8% |
0.10795455 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
18 |
5.1% |
0.05113636 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
38 |
10.8% |
0.10795455 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
195 |
55.4% |
0.55397727 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
17.9% |
0.17897727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6857 |
|
NA |
r13pad9d_3
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 500, can refrain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000
the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker
does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the
recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The
decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this
case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their
NOK 2,000.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are?
In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 500
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
59 |
16.8% |
0.1676136 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
39 |
11.1% |
0.1107955 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
114 |
32.4% |
0.3238636 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
56 |
15.9% |
0.1590909 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
84 |
23.9% |
0.2386364 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6857 |
|
NA |
r13pad9d_4
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 1000, can refrain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000
the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker
does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the
recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The
decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this
case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their
NOK 2,000.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are?
In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 1000
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
67 |
19.0% |
0.1903409 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
41 |
11.6% |
0.1164773 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
81 |
23.0% |
0.2301136 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
88 |
25.0% |
0.2500000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
21.3% |
0.2130682 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6857 |
|
NA |
r13pad9d_5
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 1500, can refrain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000
the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker
does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the
recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The
decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this
case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their
NOK 2,000.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are?
In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 1500
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
157 |
44.6% |
0.44602273 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
82 |
23.3% |
0.23295455 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
16 |
4.5% |
0.04545455 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
8 |
2.3% |
0.02272727 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
25.3% |
0.25284091 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6857 |
|
NA |
r13pad9d_6
|
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 2000, can refrain.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to
participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the
decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient.
The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000
the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker
does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the
recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The
decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this
case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their
NOK 2,000.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can
make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are?
In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or
appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the
majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six
choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people
will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 2000
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
233 |
66.2% |
0.66193182 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
18 |
5.1% |
0.05113636 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
12 |
3.4% |
0.03409091 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
8 |
2.3% |
0.02272727 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
23.0% |
0.23011364 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6857 |
|
NA |
r13P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
3588 |
49.8% |
0.4977112 |
| 2 |
Female |
3621 |
50.2% |
0.5022888 |
r13P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
2040 |
28.3% |
0.28297961 |
| 2 |
Eastern Norway |
1654 |
22.9% |
0.22943543 |
| 3 |
Southern Norway |
366 |
5.1% |
0.05076987 |
| 4 |
Western Norway |
1944 |
27.0% |
0.26966292 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
638 |
8.9% |
0.08850049 |
| 6 |
Northern Norway |
567 |
7.9% |
0.07865169 |
r13P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-18]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus |
909 |
12.6% |
0.12609238 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
1131 |
15.7% |
0.15688722 |
| 3 |
Østfold |
347 |
4.8% |
0.04813428 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
322 |
4.5% |
0.04466639 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
222 |
3.1% |
0.03079484 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
208 |
2.9% |
0.02885282 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
364 |
5.0% |
0.05049244 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
191 |
2.6% |
0.02649466 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
228 |
3.2% |
0.03162713 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
138 |
1.9% |
0.01914274 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
642 |
8.9% |
0.08905535 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
869 |
12.1% |
0.12054376 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
135 |
1.9% |
0.01872659 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
298 |
4.1% |
0.04133722 |
| 15 |
Trøndelag |
638 |
8.9% |
0.08850049 |
| 16 |
Nordland |
277 |
3.8% |
0.03842419 |
| 17 |
Troms |
212 |
2.9% |
0.02940768 |
| 18 |
Finmark |
78 |
1.1% |
0.01081981 |
r13P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
526 |
7.3% |
0.07296435 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
2019 |
28.0% |
0.28006658 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
4392 |
60.9% |
0.60923845 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
272 |
3.8% |
0.03773061 |
r13P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
25 |
0.3% |
0.003467887 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
501 |
6.9% |
0.069496463 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
819 |
11.4% |
0.113607990 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
854 |
11.8% |
0.118463032 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
346 |
4.8% |
0.047995561 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
692 |
9.6% |
0.095991122 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
1491 |
20.7% |
0.206824802 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
533 |
7.4% |
0.073935359 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
485 |
6.7% |
0.067277015 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1032 |
14.3% |
0.143154390 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
159 |
2.2% |
0.022055764 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
185 |
2.6% |
0.025662366 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
1.2% |
0.012068248 |
r13P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
219 |
3.0% |
0.03037869 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
1261 |
17.5% |
0.17492024 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
1726 |
23.9% |
0.23942294 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
1539 |
21.3% |
0.21348315 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
1096 |
15.2% |
0.15203218 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
803 |
11.1% |
0.11138854 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
565 |
7.8% |
0.07837425 |
r13P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
3206 |
44.5% |
0.44472188 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
3438 |
47.7% |
0.47690387 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
565 |
7.8% |
0.07837425 |
r13Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]
|
r13Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-31]
|
r13Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]
|
