Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen (UiB)
|
|
Sveinung Arnesen
|
Coordinator, NORCE
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Susanne Bygnes
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Kristine Bærøe
|
UiB
|
|
Cornelius Cappelen
|
UiB
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
|
Yvette Peters
|
UiB
|
|
Arjan Schakel
|
UiB
|
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
UiB
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company Ideas 2 Evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates is
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
http://www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Enhet:
Individual
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling Procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in six waves:
In wave 1, 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from
wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623 members were recruited (see documentation from
wave 3). In wave 8, 4245 new members were recruited (see documentation
from wave 8). In wave 11, 2069 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 11). In wave 14, 2036 panel members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 14). In wave 16, 5163 panel
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 16).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure
of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000
individuals. In wave 11 and 14, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000
people was drawn. In wave 16, the gross sample was 34 000.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
34 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the
register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c)
address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded
people with no current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment.
Recruitment of new members to the panel was completed in several steps.
First, an invitation letter was sent to everyone in the sample. The
invitation letter contained the following information: a) description of
the project; b) current privacy and procedural privacy guidelines; c)
timeframe for the project; d) participants right to opt out of the
panel; e) contact information to the project mangers ; f) a unique login
code and URL for the Norwegian Citizens’ Panel’s website; g) estimated
time to complete the survey (15 minutes).
To maximize the recruitment rate, an incentive has been used in the form
of a travel gift card. The value of the travel gift card is 25,000 NOK.
To participate in the drawing of the gift card, it is required that the
e-mail address is provided. Information about the lottery is included in
all correspondence with the respondents, with the exception of the final
reminder via text message.
The invitation letter was posted on October 29, 2019. A reminder was
sent to those respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b)
had not completed the survey. New respondents received only one
reminder, either via a postcard or a text message. The text message was
sent to respondents under the age of 60. The postcard was sent to
respondents over the age of 60 and to those without a registered mobile
number. Respondents were invited to participate in the Norwegian
Citizens’ Panel with reference to the invitation letter. The postcard
was posted on November 12, 2019. The login code was also given in the
postcard. The text message was sent out on November 13, 2019. The text
message contained both a login code and a direct link to the survey.
Data collection among old panel members was done in parallel with the
recruitment of new respondents. The invitation mail was sent out on
October 31, 2019. The first, second, and third reminders were sent to
the respondents’ email, on November 7, November 18, and November 21,
2019, respectively. Panel members with a registered mobile number
received the last reminder in form of a text message.
Wave 16 ended November 27th.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights,
the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender
and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in
the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register.
Information regarding the level of education is provided by the
respondents when answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 16
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r16Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r16Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r16Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-102
|
2023-10-25
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 16
|
|
NA
|
2022-02-01
|
r16pk8_1
|
Recoded
variable: Recoded to new range 0-10, instead of 1-11. Missing values not
affected.
|
|
NA
|
2022-02-01
|
r16pk8_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_1_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r16k43_1 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_2_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r16k43_2 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16pk204_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r16pk204 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16bk26_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r16bk26 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16bk33_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r16bk33 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16bk21_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r16bk21 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16bk27_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r16bk27 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_1_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_2_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16pk204_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16bk26_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16bk33_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16bk21_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16bk27_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 16
|
|
v-100
|
2019-12-11
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 16
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 16 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
12904
|
|
# Variables
|
399
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave1 |
1712 |
13.3% |
0.13267204 |
| 3 |
Wave3 |
1902 |
14.7% |
0.14739616 |
| 8 |
Wave8 |
1886 |
14.6% |
0.14615623 |
| 11 |
Wave11 |
1143 |
8.9% |
0.08857719 |
| 14 |
Wave14 |
1331 |
10.3% |
0.10314631 |
| 16 |
Wave16 |
4930 |
38.2% |
0.38205208 |
r16browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[ Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[ Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[ Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
other |
8018 |
62.1% |
0.6213577 |
| 1 |
mobile |
4886 |
37.9% |
0.3786423 |
r16opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[ Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[ Determines respondents device type.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Determines respondents device type.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
8193 |
63.5% |
0.634919405 |
| 2 |
Touch |
4656 |
36.1% |
0.360818351 |
| 3 |
Generic |
55 |
0.4% |
0.004262244 |
r16advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[ Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[ Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[ Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16group
|
Variable label:
|
[Subgroup in wave 16. Partly randomized. Group 5 corresponds to group 1
in wave 15. Respondents recruited in wave 16 are randomized into groups
6 or 7, while other respondents are randomized into groups 1, 2, 3 or 4.
]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Subgroup in wave 16. Partly randomized. Group 5 corresponds to group 1
in wave 15. Respondents recruited in wave 16 are randomized into groups
6 or 7, while other respondents are randomized into groups 1, 2, 3 or 4.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
g1 |
1764 |
13.7% |
0.13670180 |
| 2 |
g2 |
1653 |
12.8% |
0.12809981 |
| 3 |
g3 |
1728 |
13.4% |
0.13391197 |
| 4 |
g4 |
1696 |
13.1% |
0.13143211 |
| 5 |
g5 |
1133 |
8.8% |
0.08780223 |
| 6 |
g6 |
2473 |
19.2% |
0.19164600 |
| 7 |
g7 |
2457 |
19.0% |
0.19040608 |
r16tdr1
|
Variable label:
|
In which county did you spend most of your upbringing?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In which county did you spend most of your upbringing?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-20]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus (Viken from 2020) |
179 |
10.1% |
0.10147392 |
| 2 |
Aust-Agder (Agder from 2020) |
37 |
2.1% |
0.02097506 |
| 3 |
Buskerud (Viken from 2020) |
95 |
5.4% |
0.05385488 |
| 4 |
Finnmark (Troms and Finnmark fra 2020) |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01077098 |
| 5 |
Hedmark (Innlandet from 2020) |
61 |
3.5% |
0.03458050 |
| 6 |
Hordaland (Vestland from 2020) |
208 |
11.8% |
0.11791383 |
| 7 |
Møre og Romsdal |
95 |
5.4% |
0.05385488 |
| 8 |
Nord-Trøndelag (now Trøndelag) |
54 |
3.1% |
0.03061224 |
| 9 |
Nordland |
96 |
5.4% |
0.05442177 |
| 10 |
Oppland (Innlandet from 2020) |
64 |
3.6% |
0.03628118 |
| 11 |
Oslo |
167 |
9.5% |
0.09467120 |
| 12 |
Rogaland |
148 |
8.4% |
0.08390023 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane (Vestland from 2020) |
37 |
2.1% |
0.02097506 |
| 14 |
Sør-Trøndelag (now Trøndelag) |
109 |
6.2% |
0.06179138 |
| 15 |
Telemark (Vestfold and Telemark from 2020) |
57 |
3.2% |
0.03231293 |
| 16 |
Troms (Troms and Finnmark from 2020) |
68 |
3.9% |
0.03854875 |
| 17 |
Vest-Agder (Agder from 2020) |
54 |
3.1% |
0.03061224 |
| 18 |
Vestfold (Vestfold and Telemark from 2020) |
76 |
4.3% |
0.04308390 |
| 19 |
Østfold (Viken from 2020) |
79 |
4.5% |
0.04478458 |
| 20 |
Other |
61 |
3.5% |
0.03458050 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_1
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The neighbourhood/village you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The neighbourhood or village you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
589 |
33.4% |
0.33390023 |
| 2 |
Connection |
614 |
34.8% |
0.34807256 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
350 |
19.8% |
0.19841270 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
150 |
8.5% |
0.08503401 |
| 5 |
No connection |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01587302 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.9% |
0.01870748 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_2
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The municipality you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The municipality you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
611 |
34.6% |
0.346371882 |
| 2 |
Connection |
683 |
38.7% |
0.387188209 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
308 |
17.5% |
0.174603175 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
121 |
6.9% |
0.068594104 |
| 5 |
No connection |
17 |
1.0% |
0.009637188 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.4% |
0.013605442 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_3
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The county you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The county you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
410 |
23.2% |
0.23242630 |
| 2 |
Connection |
668 |
37.9% |
0.37868481 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
372 |
21.1% |
0.21088435 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
226 |
12.8% |
0.12811791 |
| 5 |
No connection |
46 |
2.6% |
0.02607710 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2.4% |
0.02380952 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_4
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The region (part of the country) you
live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The region (part of the country) you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
532 |
30.2% |
0.30158730 |
| 2 |
Connection |
657 |
37.2% |
0.37244898 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
346 |
19.6% |
0.19614512 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
157 |
8.9% |
0.08900227 |
| 5 |
No connection |
35 |
2.0% |
0.01984127 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.1% |
0.02097506 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_5
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
1186 |
67.2% |
0.672335601 |
| 2 |
Connection |
440 |
24.9% |
0.249433107 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
75 |
4.3% |
0.042517007 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
23 |
1.3% |
0.013038549 |
| 5 |
No connection |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001133787 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.2% |
0.021541950 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_6
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The Nordic countries
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Nordic countries
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
324 |
18.4% |
0.18367347 |
| 2 |
Connection |
724 |
41.0% |
0.41043084 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
438 |
24.8% |
0.24829932 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
183 |
10.4% |
0.10374150 |
| 5 |
No connection |
45 |
2.6% |
0.02551020 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
2.8% |
0.02834467 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_7
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: Europe
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Europe
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
321 |
18.2% |
0.18197279 |
| 2 |
Connection |
651 |
36.9% |
0.36904762 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
455 |
25.8% |
0.25793651 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
243 |
13.8% |
0.13775510 |
| 5 |
No connection |
50 |
2.8% |
0.02834467 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.5% |
0.02494331 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr20a
|
Variable label:
|
Has your municipality recently been merged with neighbouring
municipalities?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Has your municipality recently been merged with one or more neighbouring
municipalities? (or will be merged from 2020)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
656 |
37.2% |
0.37188209 |
| 2 |
No |
1029 |
58.3% |
0.58333333 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
76 |
4.3% |
0.04308390 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.00170068 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr20b
|
Variable label:
|
Do you support the merger of municipalities?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you support the merger of municipalities?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1086 |
61.6% |
0.61564626 |
| 2 |
No |
644 |
36.5% |
0.36507937 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
1.9% |
0.01927438 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr20c
|
Variable label:
|
Has your county authority recently been merged with neighbouring county
authorities?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Has your county authority recently been merged with one or more
neighbouring county authorities? (or will be merged from 2020)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1085 |
61.5% |
0.615079365 |
| 2 |
No |
531 |
30.1% |
0.301020408 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
143 |
8.1% |
0.081065760 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002834467 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr20d
|
Variable label:
|
Do you support the merger of county authorities?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you support the merger of county authorities?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
820 |
46.5% |
0.46485261 |
| 2 |
No |
912 |
51.7% |
0.51700680 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.8% |
0.01814059 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr_sentral
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for
non-urban Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
498 |
28.2% |
0.28231293 |
| 2 |
Agree |
491 |
27.8% |
0.27834467 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
382 |
21.7% |
0.21655329 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
165 |
9.4% |
0.09353741 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
88 |
5.0% |
0.04988662 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
109 |
6.2% |
0.06179138 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
1.8% |
0.01757370 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr18
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Should intervene to even out inequalities between
different parts of the country
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following assertion: Central
authorities should intervene with measures to even out economic
inequalities that exist between different parts of the country?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
346 |
19.6% |
0.196145125 |
| 2 |
Agree |
613 |
34.8% |
0.347505669 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
485 |
27.5% |
0.274943311 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
161 |
9.1% |
0.091269841 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
84 |
4.8% |
0.047619048 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
59 |
3.3% |
0.033446712 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
0.7% |
0.006802721 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002267574 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr19
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Resource transfer from rich to poor parts of the country
needed
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following assertion: Financial
resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to
parts that are not so rich to ensure that everyone receives public
services of the same quality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
326 |
18.5% |
0.184807256 |
| 2 |
Agree |
604 |
34.2% |
0.342403628 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
523 |
29.6% |
0.296485261 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
138 |
7.8% |
0.078231293 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
91 |
5.2% |
0.051587302 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
53 |
3.0% |
0.030045351 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
1.2% |
0.011904762 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004535147 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16polkom1_1
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy
works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Extremely dissatisfied |
16 |
0.3% |
0.003245436 |
| 1 |
1 |
29 |
0.6% |
0.005882353 |
| 2 |
2 |
59 |
1.2% |
0.011967546 |
| 3 |
3 |
155 |
3.1% |
0.031440162 |
| 4 |
4 |
169 |
3.4% |
0.034279919 |
| 5 |
5 |
400 |
8.1% |
0.081135903 |
| 6 |
6 |
495 |
10.0% |
0.100405680 |
| 7 |
7 |
1143 |
23.2% |
0.231845842 |
| 8 |
8 |
1622 |
32.9% |
0.329006085 |
| 9 |
9 |
596 |
12.1% |
0.120892495 |
| 10 |
10 - Extremely satisfied |
234 |
4.7% |
0.047464503 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.2% |
0.002434077 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16polkom2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 6 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects
either r16polkom2a or r16polkom2b.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 6 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects
either r16polkom2a or r16polkom2b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4930] [Invalid:7974]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Chooses R16POLKOM2a |
2435 |
49.4% |
0.4939148 |
| 2 |
Chooses R16POLKOM2b |
2495 |
50.6% |
0.5060852 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7974 |
|
NA |
r16polkom2a
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Your thoughts when you hear the word democracy [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think of when you hear the word democracy?
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can write as much or as little as you want, preferably a few
sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16polkom2_ran = 1. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16polkom2b
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Explanation [R16POLKOM2a] [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have just answered a question about how satisfied you are with the
way democracy works in Norway. You answered [r16polkom1_1] on a scale of
0 (Extremely dissatisfied) to 10 (Extremely satisfied).
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you please explain this answer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16polkom2_ran = 2 and r16polkom1_1
is answered. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16polkom3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: In general, immigrants are good for the Norwegian
economy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are different opinions about immigrants living in Norway. When we
use the word “immigrants” we mean people from other countries who come
to settle here. To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of
these statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, immigrants are good for the Norwegian economy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
350 |
7.1% |
0.070993915 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2131 |
43.2% |
0.432251521 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1604 |
32.5% |
0.325354970 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
670 |
13.6% |
0.135902637 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
167 |
3.4% |
0.033874239 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001622718 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16polkom4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: In general, Norwegian culture is undermined by
immigrants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are different opinions about immigrants living in Norway. When we
use the word “immigrants” we mean people from other countries who come
to settle here. To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of
these statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, Norwegian culture is undermined by immigrants.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
233 |
4.7% |
0.047261663 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1004 |
20.4% |
0.203651116 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1112 |
22.6% |
0.225557809 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
1859 |
37.7% |
0.377079108 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
715 |
14.5% |
0.145030426 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001419878 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16polkom5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Increased crime is associated with immigrants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are different opinions about immigrants living in Norway. When we
use the word “immigrants” we mean people from other countries who come
to settle here. To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of
these statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increased crime is associated with immigrants.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
568 |
11.5% |
0.115212982 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2082 |
42.2% |
0.422312373 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1385 |
28.1% |
0.280933063 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
720 |
14.6% |
0.146044625 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
171 |
3.5% |
0.034685598 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.1% |
0.000811359 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16polkom6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion: Percentage of the Norwegian people that want to accept
fewer refugees?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, what percentage of the Norwegian people believe that it
is a good proposal for Norway to accept fewer refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0% |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002426203 |
| 1 |
10% |
42 |
1.7% |
0.016983421 |
| 2 |
20% |
153 |
6.2% |
0.061868176 |
| 3 |
30% |
335 |
13.5% |
0.135463000 |
| 4 |
40% |
336 |
13.6% |
0.135867368 |
| 5 |
50% |
366 |
14.8% |
0.147998383 |
| 6 |
60% |
483 |
19.5% |
0.195309341 |
| 7 |
70% |
429 |
17.3% |
0.173473514 |
| 8 |
80% |
242 |
9.8% |
0.097856854 |
| 9 |
90% |
64 |
2.6% |
0.025879499 |
| 10 |
100% |
11 |
0.4% |
0.004448039 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002426203 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10431 |
|
NA |
r16polkom7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion: Percentage of politicians that want to accept fewer
refugees
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, what percentage of politicians believe that it is a
good proposal for Norway to accept fewer refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0% |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001213101 |
| 1 |
10% |
126 |
5.1% |
0.050950263 |
| 2 |
20% |
295 |
11.9% |
0.119288314 |
| 3 |
30% |
397 |
16.1% |
0.160533765 |
| 4 |
40% |
452 |
18.3% |
0.182773959 |
| 5 |
50% |
470 |
19.0% |
0.190052568 |
| 6 |
60% |
330 |
13.3% |
0.133441165 |
| 7 |
70% |
211 |
8.5% |
0.085321472 |
| 8 |
80% |
118 |
4.8% |
0.047715326 |
| 9 |
90% |
38 |
1.5% |
0.015365952 |
| 10 |
100% |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001617469 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.2% |
0.011726648 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10431 |
|
NA |
r16polkom10
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: To accept fewer refugees to Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it is a good or bad proposal that Norway accepts fewer
refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
249 |
10.1% |
0.100687424 |
| 2 |
Good proposal |
602 |
24.3% |
0.243429034 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
694 |
28.1% |
0.280630813 |
| 4 |
Bad proposal |
722 |
29.2% |
0.291953093 |
| 5 |
Very bad proposal |
202 |
8.2% |
0.081682167 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001617469 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10431 |
|
NA |
r16polkom11
|
Variable label:
|
How important is the refugee question for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is the refugee question for you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
286 |
11.6% |
0.115649009 |
| 2 |
Quite important |
1232 |
49.8% |
0.498180348 |
| 3 |
Neither important nor unimportant |
609 |
24.6% |
0.246259604 |
| 4 |
Not so important |
320 |
12.9% |
0.129397493 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
14 |
0.6% |
0.005661140 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.5% |
0.004852406 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10431 |
|
NA |
r16polkom8
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The people, not politicians, should make the most important
decisions
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please consider the following statements: The people, not the
politicians, should make the most important political decisions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
335 |
13.5% |
0.135463000 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
813 |
32.9% |
0.328750505 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
376 |
15.2% |
0.152042054 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
758 |
30.7% |
0.306510311 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
187 |
7.6% |
0.075616660 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001617469 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10431 |
|
NA |
r16polkom9
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Should be possible for ordinary people to initiate national
referendums
|
|
Literal question:
|
It should be possible for ordinary people to take the initiative
regarding national referendums.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
398 |
16.1% |
0.16093813 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
726 |
29.4% |
0.29357056 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
431 |
17.4% |
0.17428225 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
592 |
23.9% |
0.23938536 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
319 |
12.9% |
0.12899313 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.3% |
0.00283057 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10431 |
|
NA |
r16polint
|
Variable label:
|
How interested are you in politics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
645 |
13.1% |
0.130831643 |
| 2 |
Quite interested |
2269 |
46.0% |
0.460243408 |
| 3 |
Slightly interested |
1847 |
37.5% |
0.374645030 |
| 4 |
Not interested at all |
165 |
3.3% |
0.033468560 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.1% |
0.000811359 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16pk8_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your position on the political left-right scale
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People often talk about “left wing” and “right wing” politics. Below is
a scale where 0 represents those who are very much politically left
wing, while 10 represents those who are very much politically right
wing.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Left wing |
81 |
1.6% |
0.016430020 |
| 1 |
1 |
192 |
3.9% |
0.038945233 |
| 2 |
2 |
596 |
12.1% |
0.120892495 |
| 3 |
3 |
810 |
16.4% |
0.164300203 |
| 4 |
4 |
547 |
11.1% |
0.110953347 |
| 5 |
5 |
835 |
16.9% |
0.169371197 |
| 6 |
6 |
546 |
11.1% |
0.110750507 |
| 7 |
7 |
633 |
12.8% |
0.128397566 |
| 8 |
8 |
443 |
9.0% |
0.089858012 |
| 9 |
9 |
125 |
2.5% |
0.025354970 |
| 10 |
10 - Right wing |
88 |
1.8% |
0.017849899 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.7% |
0.006896552 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng1
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you use a car as a means of transport during a typical
month?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you use a car as a means of transport during a typical
month?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
616 |
14.9% |
0.1492971401 |
| 2 |
Daily |
1556 |
37.7% |
0.3771206980 |
| 3 |
Weekly |
1133 |
27.5% |
0.2746000969 |
| 4 |
A few times a month |
415 |
10.1% |
0.1005816772 |
| 5 |
Less than once a month |
229 |
5.6% |
0.0555016966 |
| 6 |
Never |
176 |
4.3% |
0.0426563257 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0002423655 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng2
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you use public transport during a typical month?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you use public transport during a typical month?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
359 |
8.7% |
0.087009210 |
| 2 |
Daily |
321 |
7.8% |
0.077799321 |
| 3 |
Weekly |
578 |
14.0% |
0.140087252 |
| 4 |
A few times a month |
868 |
21.0% |
0.210373243 |
| 5 |
Less than once a month |
1451 |
35.2% |
0.351672322 |
| 6 |
Never |
521 |
12.6% |
0.126272419 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.7% |
0.006786234 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng3
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you cycle during a typical month?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you cycle during a typical month?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
124 |
3.0% |
0.030053320 |
| 2 |
Daily |
282 |
6.8% |
0.068347067 |
| 3 |
Weekly |
475 |
11.5% |
0.115123606 |
| 4 |
A few times a month |
503 |
12.2% |
0.121909840 |
| 5 |
Less than once a month |
1038 |
25.2% |
0.251575376 |
| 6 |
Never |
1690 |
41.0% |
0.409597673 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.3% |
0.003393117 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Drive a petrol or diesel car
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or
options you use most. I:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Drive a petrol or diesel car
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Drive a petrol or diesel car |
2155 |
52.2% |
0.5222976 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1971 |
47.8% |
0.4777024 |
r16bompeng4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Drive a hybrid car
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or
options you use most. I:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Drive a hybrid car
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Drive a hybrid car |
349 |
8.5% |
0.08458556 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3777 |
91.5% |
0.91541444 |
r16bompeng4_3
|
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Drive an electric car
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or
options you use most. I:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Drive an electric car
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Drive an electric car |
462 |
11.2% |
0.1119729 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3664 |
88.8% |
0.8880271 |
r16bompeng4_4
|
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Take the bus
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or
options you use most. I:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Take the bus
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Take the bus |
791 |
19.2% |
0.1917111 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3335 |
80.8% |
0.8082889 |
r16bompeng4_5
|
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Take the tram or train
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or
options you use most. I:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Take the tram or train
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Take the tram or train |
632 |
15.3% |
0.153175 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3494 |
84.7% |
0.846825 |
r16bompeng4_6
|
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Take a boat
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or
options you use most. I:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Take a boat
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Take a boat |
54 |
1.3% |
0.01308774 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
4072 |
98.7% |
0.98691226 |
r16bompeng4_7
|
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Walk
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or
options you use most. I:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Walk
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Walk |
1589 |
38.5% |
0.3851188 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2537 |
61.5% |
0.6148812 |
r16bompeng4_8
|
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Cycle
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or
options you use most. I:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cycle
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Cycle |
702 |
17.0% |
0.1701406 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3424 |
83.0% |
0.8298594 |
r16bompeng4_9
|
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Kick scooter
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or
options you use most. I:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Kick scooter
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Kick scooter |
45 |
1.1% |
0.01090645 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
4081 |
98.9% |
0.98909355 |
r16bompeng4_10
|
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or
options you use most. I:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other: |
101 |
2.4% |
0.02447891 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
4025 |
97.6% |
0.97552109 |
r16bompeng4_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R16BOMPENG4_10] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or
options you use most. I:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Annet:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16bompeng5
|
Variable label:
|
Do you drive through tollbooths daily?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you drive a car through one or more tollbooths on your way to your
daily tasks?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6 and r16bompeng4 = 1 | 2 | 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
999 |
35.4% |
0.3540042523 |
| 2 |
No |
1821 |
64.5% |
0.6452870305 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0007087172 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10082 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng6
|
Variable label:
|
Approximately how much did you pay in road tolls last month?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Approximately how much did you pay in road tolls last month?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Include toll charges, not ferry charges.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NOK 0 - 99,- |
1753 |
42.5% |
0.424866699 |
| 2 |
NOK 100 - 499,- |
1287 |
31.2% |
0.311924382 |
| 3 |
NOK 500 - 999,- |
636 |
15.4% |
0.154144450 |
| 4 |
NOK 1000 - 1499,- |
233 |
5.6% |
0.056471159 |
| 5 |
NOK 1500 - 1999,- |
92 |
2.2% |
0.022297625 |
| 6 |
NOK 2000 - 2499,- |
31 |
0.8% |
0.007513330 |
| 7 |
NOK 2500 - 2999,- |
16 |
0.4% |
0.003877848 |
| 8 |
NOK 3000 - 3499,- |
7 |
0.2% |
0.001696558 |
| 9 |
More than NOK 3500,- |
9 |
0.2% |
0.002181289 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
62 |
1.5% |
0.015026660 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng7
|
Variable label:
|
Has your road toll bill increased over the past year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Has your road toll bill increased over the past year?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1592 |
38.6% |
0.38584586 |
| 2 |
No |
2439 |
59.1% |
0.59112942 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
95 |
2.3% |
0.02302472 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng8
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think about the level of toll charges in general?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the level of toll charges in general?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Far too high |
1414 |
34.3% |
0.342704799 |
| 2 |
Slightly high |
1118 |
27.1% |
0.270964615 |
| 3 |
Just the right amount |
1011 |
24.5% |
0.245031508 |
| 4 |
Slightly low |
135 |
3.3% |
0.032719341 |
| 5 |
Far too low |
65 |
1.6% |
0.015753757 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
375 |
9.1% |
0.090887058 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001938924 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your view: All road tolls should be abolished, no matter what they are
used for
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following statements best suits your view on road tolls?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All road tolls should be abolished, no matter what they are used for
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select the option or options that suit you best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All road tolls should be abolished, no matter what they are used for |
651 |
15.8% |
0.1577799 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3475 |
84.2% |
0.8422201 |
r16bompeng9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Your view: Road tolls acceptable if used to fund roads, bridges and
tunnels
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following statements best suits your view on road tolls?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls are acceptable if they are used to fund roads, bridges and
tunnels
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select the option or options that suit you best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Road tolls are acceptable if they are used to fund roads, bridges and tunnels |
2415 |
58.5% |
0.5853127 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1711 |
41.5% |
0.4146873 |
r16bompeng9_3
|
Variable label:
|
Your view: Road tolls acceptable if used to curb traffic in the largest
cities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following statements best suits your view on road tolls?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls are acceptable if they are used to curb traffic in the
largest cities
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select the option or options that suit you best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Road tolls are acceptable if they are used to curb traffic in the largest cities |
1139 |
27.6% |
0.2760543 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2987 |
72.4% |
0.7239457 |
r16bompeng9_4
|
Variable label:
|
Your view: Road tolls acceptable if used for environmental initiatives
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following statements best suits your view on road tolls?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls are acceptable if they are used for public transport, bicycle
paths and other environmental initiatives
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select the option or options that suit you best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Road tolls are acceptable if they are used for public transport, bicycle paths
and other environmental initiatives |
1548 |
37.5% |
0.3751818 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2578 |
62.5% |
0.6248182 |
r16bompeng9_5
|
Variable label:
|
Your view: Road tolls are acceptable no matter what they are used for
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following statements best suits your view on road tolls?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls are acceptable no matter what they are used for
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select the option or options that suit you best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Road tolls are acceptable no matter what they are used for |
194 |
4.7% |
0.0470189 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3932 |
95.3% |
0.9529811 |
r16polkom12
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these political parties do you feel closest to?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these political parties do you feel closest to?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
107 |
6.5% |
0.06473079 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
175 |
10.6% |
0.10586812 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party |
370 |
22.4% |
0.22383545 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
238 |
14.4% |
0.14398064 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
96 |
5.8% |
0.05807623 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party |
73 |
4.4% |
0.04416213 |
| 7 |
The Christian Democrats |
58 |
3.5% |
0.03508772 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party |
372 |
22.5% |
0.22504537 |
| 9 |
The Progress Party |
142 |
8.6% |
0.08590442 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.3% |
0.01330913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom13
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these political parties do you feel furthest from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these political parties do you feel furthest from?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The order of the response options is randomized
(but adhers to the order of r16polkom12)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
377 |
22.8% |
0.22807018 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
63 |
3.8% |
0.03811252 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
32 |
1.9% |
0.01935874 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
228 |
13.8% |
0.13793103 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party |
29 |
1.8% |
0.01754386 |
| 7 |
The Christian Democrats |
126 |
7.6% |
0.07622505 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party |
40 |
2.4% |
0.02419843 |
| 9 |
The Progress Party |
715 |
43.3% |
0.43254688 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.5% |
0.01451906 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom14
|
Variable label:
|
Which of these issues is most important to you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these issues is most important to you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Whether begging should be legal |
18 |
1.1% |
0.010889292 |
| 2 |
Taxation policies |
340 |
20.6% |
0.205686630 |
| 3 |
Immigration policies |
304 |
18.4% |
0.183908046 |
| 4 |
The merger of municipalities |
127 |
7.7% |
0.076830006 |
| 5 |
Climate and environment |
712 |
43.1% |
0.430732002 |
| 6 |
None of these issues are important to me |
144 |
8.7% |
0.087114338 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004839685 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_parti
|
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 and r16polkom12 is answered. Background
variable. Assignes the largest party on the opposite side of the
political spectrum. If the respondent answers Red Party, Socialist
LeftParty, Labor Party, Green Party or Centre Party in r16polkom12, the
value is set to “Conservative Party”. If the respondent answers Progress
Party Conservative Party, Christian Democratic Party or Liberal Party in
r16polkom12, the value is set to “Labor Party”.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 and r16polkom12 is answered. Background
variable. Assignes the largest party on the opposite side of the
political spectrum. If the respondent answers Red Party, Socialist Left
Party, Labor Party, Green Party or Centre Party in r16polkom12, the
value is set to “Conservative Party”. If the respondent answers Progress
Party Conservative Party, Christian Democratic Party or Liberal Party in
r16polkom12, the value is set to “Labor Party”.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1631] [Invalid:11273]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
645 |
39.5% |
0.3954629 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
986 |
60.5% |
0.6045371 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11273 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Vote for [R16POLKOM12]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you
will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or
cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale,
the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you
feel about a group.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who vote for [R16POLKOM12]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom12 is answered. The wording of the
question depends on the answer given in r16polkom12. The response scale
is represented by a gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and
“100” is dark red. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003678725 |
| 1 |
10 |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004904966 |
| 2 |
20 |
17 |
1.0% |
0.010423053 |
| 3 |
30 |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004291845 |
| 4 |
40 |
19 |
1.2% |
0.011649295 |
| 5 |
50 |
144 |
8.8% |
0.088289393 |
| 6 |
60 |
88 |
5.4% |
0.053954629 |
| 7 |
70 |
237 |
14.5% |
0.145309626 |
| 8 |
80 |
430 |
26.4% |
0.263641937 |
| 9 |
90 |
298 |
18.3% |
0.182709994 |
| 10 |
100 |
344 |
21.1% |
0.210913550 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.0% |
0.020232986 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11273 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Vote for [R16POLKOM13]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you
will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or
cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale,
the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you
feel about a group.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who vote for [R16POLKOM13]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom13 is answered. The wording of the
question depends on the answer given in r16polkom13. The response scale
is represented by a gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and
“100” is dark red. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
575 |
35.3% |
0.352977287 |
| 1 |
10 |
360 |
22.1% |
0.220994475 |
| 2 |
20 |
255 |
15.7% |
0.156537753 |
| 3 |
30 |
121 |
7.4% |
0.074278699 |
| 4 |
40 |
74 |
4.5% |
0.045426642 |
| 5 |
50 |
133 |
8.2% |
0.081645181 |
| 6 |
60 |
19 |
1.2% |
0.011663597 |
| 7 |
70 |
18 |
1.1% |
0.011049724 |
| 8 |
80 |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007366483 |
| 9 |
90 |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006138735 |
| 10 |
100 |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009208103 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.3% |
0.022713321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11275 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Vote for [R16POLKOM15_parti]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you
will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or
cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale,
the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you
feel about a group.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who vote for [R16POLKOM15_parti]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom12 is answered and if the value
(political party) is not the same as in r16polkom15_2. The wording of
the question depends on the answer given in r16polkom12. See background
variable r16polkom15_parti. The response scale is represented by a
gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
75 |
4.7% |
0.047348485 |
| 1 |
10 |
128 |
8.1% |
0.080808081 |
| 2 |
20 |
213 |
13.4% |
0.134469697 |
| 3 |
30 |
215 |
13.6% |
0.135732323 |
| 4 |
40 |
202 |
12.8% |
0.127525253 |
| 5 |
50 |
368 |
23.2% |
0.232323232 |
| 6 |
60 |
151 |
9.5% |
0.095328283 |
| 7 |
70 |
114 |
7.2% |
0.071969697 |
| 8 |
80 |
60 |
3.8% |
0.037878788 |
| 9 |
90 |
13 |
0.8% |
0.008207071 |
| 10 |
100 |
12 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.1% |
0.020833333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11320 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_4
|
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Are on the left wing of politics
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you
will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or
cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale,
the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you
feel about a group.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who are on the left wing of Norwegian politics
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient
color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
60 |
3.6% |
0.03629764 |
| 1 |
10 |
74 |
4.5% |
0.04476709 |
| 2 |
20 |
125 |
7.6% |
0.07562008 |
| 3 |
30 |
137 |
8.3% |
0.08287961 |
| 4 |
40 |
158 |
9.6% |
0.09558379 |
| 5 |
50 |
325 |
19.7% |
0.19661222 |
| 6 |
60 |
152 |
9.2% |
0.09195402 |
| 7 |
70 |
171 |
10.3% |
0.10344828 |
| 8 |
80 |
201 |
12.2% |
0.12159710 |
| 9 |
90 |
110 |
6.7% |
0.06654567 |
| 10 |
100 |
91 |
5.5% |
0.05505142 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
49 |
3.0% |
0.02964307 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_5
|
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Are on the right wing of politics
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you
will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or
cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale,
the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you
feel about a group.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who are on the right wing of Norwegian politics
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient
color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
77 |
4.7% |
0.04658197 |
| 1 |
10 |
120 |
7.3% |
0.07259528 |
| 2 |
20 |
190 |
11.5% |
0.11494253 |
| 3 |
30 |
178 |
10.8% |
0.10768300 |
| 4 |
40 |
171 |
10.3% |
0.10344828 |
| 5 |
50 |
345 |
20.9% |
0.20871143 |
| 6 |
60 |
151 |
9.1% |
0.09134906 |
| 7 |
70 |
157 |
9.5% |
0.09497883 |
| 8 |
80 |
137 |
8.3% |
0.08287961 |
| 9 |
90 |
37 |
2.2% |
0.02238355 |
| 10 |
100 |
40 |
2.4% |
0.02419843 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
3.0% |
0.03024803 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_6
|
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Completely disagree with you about immigration
policies
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you
will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or
cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale,
the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you
feel about a group.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about immigration policies
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient
color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
201 |
12.2% |
0.121597096 |
| 1 |
10 |
224 |
13.6% |
0.135511192 |
| 2 |
20 |
260 |
15.7% |
0.157289776 |
| 3 |
30 |
233 |
14.1% |
0.140955838 |
| 4 |
40 |
182 |
11.0% |
0.110102843 |
| 5 |
50 |
388 |
23.5% |
0.234724743 |
| 6 |
60 |
40 |
2.4% |
0.024198427 |
| 7 |
70 |
35 |
2.1% |
0.021173624 |
| 8 |
80 |
23 |
1.4% |
0.013914096 |
| 9 |
90 |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005444646 |
| 10 |
100 |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005444646 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
49 |
3.0% |
0.029643073 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_7
|
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Completely disagree with you about climate
policies
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you
will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or
cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale,
the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you
feel about a group.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about climate policies
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient
color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
178 |
10.8% |
0.107683001 |
| 1 |
10 |
245 |
14.8% |
0.148215366 |
| 2 |
20 |
261 |
15.8% |
0.157894737 |
| 3 |
30 |
224 |
13.6% |
0.135511192 |
| 4 |
40 |
180 |
10.9% |
0.108892922 |
| 5 |
50 |
366 |
22.1% |
0.221415608 |
| 6 |
60 |
59 |
3.6% |
0.035692680 |
| 7 |
70 |
36 |
2.2% |
0.021778584 |
| 8 |
80 |
27 |
1.6% |
0.016333938 |
| 9 |
90 |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009074410 |
| 10 |
100 |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007259528 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
3.0% |
0.030248034 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_8
|
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Completely disagree with you about taxation
policies
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you
will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or
cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale,
the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you
feel about a group.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about taxation policies
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient
color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
82 |
5.0% |
0.049606776 |
| 1 |
10 |
145 |
8.8% |
0.087719298 |
| 2 |
20 |
253 |
15.3% |
0.153055051 |
| 3 |
30 |
260 |
15.7% |
0.157289776 |
| 4 |
40 |
229 |
13.9% |
0.138535995 |
| 5 |
50 |
492 |
29.8% |
0.297640653 |
| 6 |
60 |
55 |
3.3% |
0.033272837 |
| 7 |
70 |
34 |
2.1% |
0.020568663 |
| 8 |
80 |
32 |
1.9% |
0.019358742 |
| 9 |
90 |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002419843 |
| 10 |
100 |
16 |
1.0% |
0.009679371 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
3.1% |
0.030852995 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_9
|
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Completely disagree with you about begging
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you
will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or
cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale,
the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you
feel about a group.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about whether begging should be
legal
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient
color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
163 |
9.9% |
0.098608590 |
| 1 |
10 |
127 |
7.7% |
0.076830006 |
| 2 |
20 |
211 |
12.8% |
0.127646703 |
| 3 |
30 |
192 |
11.6% |
0.116152450 |
| 4 |
40 |
192 |
11.6% |
0.116152450 |
| 5 |
50 |
568 |
34.4% |
0.343617665 |
| 6 |
60 |
53 |
3.2% |
0.032062916 |
| 7 |
70 |
34 |
2.1% |
0.020568663 |
| 8 |
80 |
33 |
2.0% |
0.019963702 |
| 9 |
90 |
11 |
0.7% |
0.006654567 |
| 10 |
100 |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008469449 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
3.3% |
0.033272837 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_10
|
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Completely disagree with you about the merger of
municipalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you
will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or
cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale,
the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you
feel about a group.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about the merger of
municipalities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient
color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
96 |
5.8% |
0.058076225 |
| 1 |
10 |
94 |
5.7% |
0.056866304 |
| 2 |
20 |
132 |
8.0% |
0.079854809 |
| 3 |
30 |
203 |
12.3% |
0.122807018 |
| 4 |
40 |
209 |
12.6% |
0.126436782 |
| 5 |
50 |
670 |
40.5% |
0.405323654 |
| 6 |
60 |
87 |
5.3% |
0.052631579 |
| 7 |
70 |
53 |
3.2% |
0.032062916 |
| 8 |
80 |
32 |
1.9% |
0.019358742 |
| 9 |
90 |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006049607 |
| 10 |
100 |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009074410 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
3.1% |
0.031457955 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom16_enighet
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom16.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom16.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
completely agree with |
815 |
49.3% |
0.493043 |
| 2 |
completely disagree with |
838 |
50.7% |
0.506957 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom16_sak
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom16.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom16.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
immigration policies |
350 |
21.2% |
0.2117362 |
| 2 |
taxation policies |
296 |
17.9% |
0.1790684 |
| 3 |
environmental policies |
331 |
20.0% |
0.2002420 |
| 4 |
the merger of municipalities |
324 |
19.6% |
0.1960073 |
| 5 |
the ban on begging |
352 |
21.3% |
0.2129462 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom16_frekvens_nytte
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom16.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom16.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
, who often talks about this issue and has a lot of useful information about it? |
280 |
16.9% |
0.1693890 |
| 2 |
, who rarely talks about this issue, but still has a lot of useful information
about it? |
294 |
17.8% |
0.1778584 |
| 3 |
, who often talks about this issue, but has very little useful information about
it? |
278 |
16.8% |
0.1681791 |
| 4 |
, who rarely talks about this issue and has very little useful information about
it? |
278 |
16.8% |
0.1681791 |
| 5 |
and who often talks about this issue? |
266 |
16.1% |
0.1609195 |
| 6 |
, but who rarely talks about this issue? |
257 |
15.5% |
0.1554749 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom16
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with daughter-/son-in-law who you [agree/disagree] regarding
[issue] talked about [a lot / little] about
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied or dissatisfied would you be if you had a daughter or son
who married a person who you [|agreement] regarding
[|issue][|frequency_usefulness]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on the randomized values of r16polkom16_enighet, r16polkom16_sak and
r16polkom16_frekvens_nytte.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
88 |
5.3% |
0.05323654 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
248 |
15.0% |
0.15003025 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
81 |
4.9% |
0.04900181 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
979 |
59.2% |
0.59225650 |
| 5 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
152 |
9.2% |
0.09195402 |
| 6 |
Dissatisfied |
67 |
4.1% |
0.04053237 |
| 7 |
Very dissatisfied |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_kjonn
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom17_screening.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom17_screening.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
woman |
838 |
50.7% |
0.506957 |
| 2 |
man |
815 |
49.3% |
0.493043 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_kjennskap
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom17_screening.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom17_screening.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
who you know well |
825 |
49.9% |
0.4990926 |
| 2 |
who is an acquaintance of yours |
828 |
50.1% |
0.5009074 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_enighet
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom17_screening.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom17_screening.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
totally agrees with you |
824 |
49.8% |
0.4984876 |
| 2 |
totally disagrees with you |
829 |
50.2% |
0.5015124 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_enighet2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom17_screening_2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom17_screening_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
totally agrees with you |
839 |
50.8% |
0.507562 |
| 2 |
totally disagrees with you |
814 |
49.2% |
0.492438 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_sak
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom17a / r16polkom17b.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom17a / r16polkom17b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” |
572 |
34.6% |
0.3460375 |
| 2 |
“Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” |
522 |
31.6% |
0.3157895 |
| 3 |
“Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture” |
559 |
33.8% |
0.3381730 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_liker
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom17a / r16polkom17b.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value
for r16polkom17a / r16polkom17b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
3 |
383 |
23.2% |
0.2316999 |
| 2 |
12 |
442 |
26.7% |
0.2673926 |
| 3 |
225 |
410 |
24.8% |
0.2480339 |
| 4 |
3000 |
418 |
25.3% |
0.2528736 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17ab_order
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects order
of r16polkom17a and r16polkom17b.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects order
of r16polkom17a and r16polkom17b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
R16POLKOM17a first |
791 |
47.9% |
0.4785239 |
| 2 |
R16POLKOM17b first |
862 |
52.1% |
0.5214761 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17cd_order
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects order
of r16polkom17c and r16polkom17d.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects order
of r16polkom17c and r16polkom17d.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
R16POLKOM17c first |
791 |
47.9% |
0.4785239 |
| 2 |
R16POLKOM17d first |
862 |
52.1% |
0.5214761 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_screening
|
Variable label:
|
Have [woman/man] on Facebook [you know well/is an acquaintance] who
politically [agrees/disagrees] with you
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study the reading of news on Facebook. In order for our
study to be similar to situations where you usually come across news
shared by friends on Facebook, we would like you to indicate whether the
profile we have described below fits the description of one of your
Facebook friends.
Profile: A [woman/man] [who you know well/who is an acquaintance of
yours] and who [totally agrees with you/totally disagrees with you] when
it comes to politics.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Does this description fit one (or more) of your friends on Facebook?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The wording of the question depends on the
values of r16polkom17_kjonn, r16polkom17_kjennskap and
r16polkom17_enighet.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
814 |
49.2% |
0.49243799 |
| 2 |
No |
412 |
24.9% |
0.24924380 |
| 3 |
Don't have a Facebook account |
405 |
24.5% |
0.24500907 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.3% |
0.01330913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_screening_2
|
Variable label:
|
Have a friend on Facebook you politically [agree/disagree] with
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You replied that the profile didn’t fit one of your Facebook friends.
Below, we have created a new profile and therefore would like you to
indicate whether this new profile fits the description of one of your
Facebook friends.
Profile: A person that you [agree with / disagree with] when it comes to
politics.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Does this description fit one (or more) of your friends on Facebook?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 2 The wording of the
question depends on the value r16polkom17_enighet2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
201 |
48.8% |
0.48786408 |
| 2 |
No |
205 |
49.8% |
0.49757282 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
1.5% |
0.01456311 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12492 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_screening_2a
|
Variable label:
|
The person is [Someone I know well/ An acquaintance]
|
|
Literal question:
|
The person is…
|
|
Post-question:
|
(choose only one answer)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 2 and
r16polkom17_screening_2a = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Someone I know well |
93 |
46.3% |
0.46268657 |
| 2 |
An acquaintance |
103 |
51.2% |
0.51243781 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
2.5% |
0.02487562 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12703 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_screening_2b
|
Variable label:
|
The person is [Female/Male]
|
|
Literal question:
|
The person is…
|
|
Post-question:
|
(choose only one answer)
If you wish, you can also enter the name of this specific person here.
We do not store this information. [text box]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 2 and
r16polkom17_screening_2a = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Female |
80 |
39.8% |
0.39800995 |
| 2 |
Male |
114 |
56.7% |
0.56716418 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
3.5% |
0.03482587 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12703 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_p_kjonn
|
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or
r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Background variable. Assigns normative
(gender) pronoun according to the respondent’s prior response.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or
r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Background variable. Assigns normative
(gender) pronoun according to the respondent’s prior response.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1022] [Invalid:11882]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
her |
489 |
47.8% |
0.478473581 |
| 2 |
him |
526 |
51.5% |
0.514677104 |
| 3 |
this person |
7 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11882 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_p_kjonn2
|
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or
r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Background variable. Assigns accusative
(gender) pronoun according to the respondent’s prior response.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or
r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Background variable. Assigns accusative
(gender) pronoun according to the respondent’s prior response.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1022] [Invalid:11882]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
she |
489 |
47.8% |
0.478473581 |
| 2 |
he |
526 |
51.5% |
0.514677104 |
| 3 |
the person |
7 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11882 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17a
|
Variable label:
|
How likely to have clicked on a debate article from a given Facebook
post?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You replied that you have a friend on Facebook who is a
[female/male], [you know well / is an acquaintance of yours] that
[totally agrees with you / totally disagrees with you]. Imagine that you
come across a post on Facebook that is shared and recommended by
[R16POLKOM17_p_kjonn].
The headline of the debate article that [R16POLKOM17_p_kjonn2] has
shared is [r16polkom17_sak].
There are [r16polkom17_liker] people who like the post.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on and read this debate
article if you had come across this post?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or
r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Experiment. The order of r16polkom17a and
r16polkom17b is randomized. The wording of the question depends on
randomized values or values assigned according to the respondent’s
answers. The first sentence is primarily generated from one of two
possible sets of variables.
If r16polkom17_screening = 1: r16polkom17_kjonn,
r16polkom17_kjennskap, r16polkom17_enighet. If r16polkom17_screening_2 =
1: r16polkom17_screening_2b (gender), r16polkom17_screening_2a
(familiarity), r16polkom17_enighet2.
Note that if r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1, but r16polkom17_screening_2a
or r16polkom17_screening_2b is not answered, the first sentence is
simply set as “You replied that you have a friend on Facebook who
[totally agrees with you / totally disagrees with you].” (translated)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
132 |
13.0% |
0.1300492611 |
| 2 |
Likely |
244 |
24.0% |
0.2403940887 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
311 |
30.6% |
0.3064039409 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
208 |
20.5% |
0.2049261084 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
119 |
11.7% |
0.1172413793 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0009852217 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11889 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17b
|
Variable label:
|
How likely to change Facebook settings to see fewer posts from
[her/him]?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You replied that you have a friend on Facebook who is a
[female/male], [you know well / is an acquaintance of yours] that
[totally agrees with you / totally disagrees with you]. Imagine that you
come across a post on Facebook that is shared and recommended by
[R16POLKOM17_p_kjonn].
The headline of the debate article that [R16POLKOM17_p_kjonn2] has
shared is [r16polkom17_sak].
There are [r16polkom17_liker] people who like the post.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would have changed your settings on Facebook
so as to see fewer posts from [her / him / this person] in the future?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or
r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Experiment. The order of r16polkom17a and
r16polkom17b is randomized. The wording of the question depends on
randomized values or values assigned according to the respondent’s
answers. The first sentence is primarily generated from one of two
possible sets of variables.
If r16polkom17_screening = 1: r16polkom17_kjonn, r16polkom17_kjennskap,
r16polkom17_enighet. If r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1:
r16polkom17_screening_2b (gender), r16polkom17_screening_2a
(familiarity), r16polkom17_enighet2. Note that if
r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1, but r16polkom17_screening_2a or
r16polkom17_screening_2b is not answered, the first sentence is simply
set as “You replied that you have a friend on Facebook who [totally
agrees with you / totally disagrees with you].” (translated)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly likely |
45 |
4.4% |
0.04433498 |
| 2 |
Likely |
77 |
7.6% |
0.07586207 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
131 |
12.9% |
0.12906404 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
445 |
43.8% |
0.43842365 |
| 5 |
Not at all likely |
317 |
31.2% |
0.31231527 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11889 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17c
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The debate article probably contains useful information
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Hvor enig eller uenig er du i følgende påstander om situasjonen på
Facebook som du nettopp leste?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The debate article probably contains information that would have been
useful for me to know.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or
r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Part of experiment. The order of
r16polkom17c and r16polkom17d is randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
27 |
2.7% |
0.026600985 |
| 2 |
Agree |
167 |
16.5% |
0.164532020 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
274 |
27.0% |
0.269950739 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
297 |
29.3% |
0.292610837 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
90 |
8.9% |
0.088669951 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
106 |
10.4% |
0.104433498 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
51 |
5.0% |
0.050246305 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002955665 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11889 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17d
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The debate article would propably have aroused negative
emotions in me
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Hvor enig eller uenig er du i følgende påstander om situasjonen på
Facebook som du nettopp leste?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The debate article would probably have aroused negative emotions in me
(that would have caused you to be annoyed, provoked or angry when you
read it)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or
r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Part of experiment. The order of
r16polkom17c and r16polkom17d is randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
58 |
5.7% |
0.05714286 |
| 2 |
Agree |
150 |
14.8% |
0.14778325 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
255 |
25.1% |
0.25123153 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
313 |
30.8% |
0.30837438 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
64 |
6.3% |
0.06305419 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
115 |
11.3% |
0.11330049 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
54 |
5.3% |
0.05320197 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.6% |
0.00591133 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11889 |
|
NA |
r16pktilfreds3
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
234 |
14.2% |
0.14156080 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
898 |
54.3% |
0.54325469 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
376 |
22.7% |
0.22746521 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
114 |
6.9% |
0.06896552 |
| 5 |
Very dissatisfied |
31 |
1.9% |
0.01875378 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16kmelbil
|
Variable label:
|
Open: First thoughts when you hear/read the word “electric car” [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the first thing you think of when you hear or read the word
“electric car”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All replies are welcome,
preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you would
prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16skolehelse1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Number of children of primary school age (5-13 years)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How many children do you have in the following age groups:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Primary school age (5-13 years)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No children |
1874 |
76.3% |
0.762718763 |
| 2 |
One child |
223 |
9.1% |
0.090761091 |
| 3 |
Two children |
145 |
5.9% |
0.059015059 |
| 4 |
Three or more children |
21 |
0.9% |
0.008547009 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
194 |
7.9% |
0.078958079 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Number of children of lower secondary school age (12-16 years)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How many children do you have in the following age groups:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Lower secondary school age (12-16 years)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No children |
1980 |
80.6% |
0.805860806 |
| 2 |
One child |
185 |
7.5% |
0.075295075 |
| 3 |
Two children |
19 |
0.8% |
0.007733008 |
| 4 |
Three or more children |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
273 |
11.1% |
0.111111111 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Number of children of secondary school age (15-19 years)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How many children do you have in the following age groups:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Upper secondary school age (15-19 years)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No children |
1962 |
79.9% |
0.798534799 |
| 2 |
One child |
190 |
7.7% |
0.077330077 |
| 3 |
Two children |
37 |
1.5% |
0.015059015 |
| 4 |
Three or more children |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002442002 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
262 |
10.7% |
0.106634107 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse2
|
Variable label:
|
Has your child been in contact with school health services during the
last year?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Has/have your child/children been in contact with school health services
during the last 12 months, as far as you know?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If this contact has only taken place through the regular vaccination
programme, you can choose “no”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7 and (r16skolehelse1_1 = 2 | 3 | 4 or
r16skolehelse1_2 = 2 | 3 | 4 or r16skolehelse1_3 = 2 | 3 | 4). ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
253 |
42.2% |
0.421666667 |
| 2 |
No |
346 |
57.7% |
0.576666667 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001666667 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12304 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse2a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Contact with school health services involves: Primary school age
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who did this contact involve?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Primary school age (5-13 years)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7 and r16skolehelse1_1 = 2 | 3 | 4 and
r16skolehelse2 = 1. The response option appears to the respondent if
r16skolehelse1_1 = 2 | 3 | 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Primary school age (5-13 years) |
160 |
90.4% |
0.9039548 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12727 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
17 |
9.6% |
0.0960452 |
r16skolehelse2a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Contact with school health services involves: Lower secondary school age
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who did this contact involve?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Lower secondary school age (12-16 years)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7 and r16skolehelse1_2 = 2 | 3 | 4 and
r16skolehelse2 = 1. The response option appears to the respondent if
r16skolehelse1_2 = 2 | 3 | 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lower secondary school age (12-16 years) |
66 |
64.7% |
0.6470588 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12802 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
36 |
35.3% |
0.3529412 |
r16skolehelse2a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Contact with school health services involves: Upper secondary school age
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who did this contact involve?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Upper secondary school age (15-19 years)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7 and r16skolehelse1_3 = 2 | 3 | 4 and
r16skolehelse2 = 1. The response option appears to the respondent if
r16skolehelse1_3 = 2 | 3 | 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Upper secondary school age (15-19 years) |
52 |
61.2% |
0.6117647 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12819 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
33 |
38.8% |
0.3882353 |
r16skolehelse2b
|
Variable label:
|
Why have none of your children used school health services?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Why have none of your children used school health services:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7 and (r16skolehelse1_1 = 2 | 3 | 4 or
r16skolehelse1_2 = 2 | 3 | 4 or r16skolehelse1_3 = 2 | 3 | 4) and
r16skolehelse2 = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None of them needed to |
286 |
82.7% |
0.826589595 |
| 2 |
The kind of help that school health services provide is unclear |
21 |
6.1% |
0.060693642 |
| 3 |
School health services do not cover our needs |
13 |
3.8% |
0.037572254 |
| 4 |
It is difficult to get access to the public health nurse |
4 |
1.2% |
0.011560694 |
| 5 |
Other: |
20 |
5.8% |
0.057803468 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005780347 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12558 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse2b_5_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R16SKOLEHELSE2B_5] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Why have none of your children used school health services:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7 and (r16skolehelse1_1 = 2 | 3 | 4 or
r16skolehelse1_2 = 2 | 3 | 4 or r16skolehelse1_3 = 2 | 3 | 4) and
r16skolehelse2 = 2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16skolehelse3
|
Variable label:
|
Your impression of the school health services offered to students today
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your general impression of the school health services offered to
students today?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
104 |
4.2% |
0.04232804 |
| 2 |
Good |
1116 |
45.4% |
0.45421245 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
868 |
35.3% |
0.35327635 |
| 4 |
Not very good |
188 |
7.7% |
0.07651608 |
| 5 |
Not good at all |
37 |
1.5% |
0.01505902 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
144 |
5.9% |
0.05860806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Vaccines
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vaccines
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Vaccines |
1910 |
77.7% |
0.7773708 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
547 |
22.3% |
0.2226292 |
r16skolehelse4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Sexuality and contraception
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sexuality and contraception
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Sexuality and contraception |
249 |
10.1% |
0.1013431 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2208 |
89.9% |
0.8986569 |
r16skolehelse4_3
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Questions related to mental
health
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Difficult thoughts or feelings, questions related to mental health
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Difficult thoughts or feelings, questions related to mental health |
142 |
5.8% |
0.05779406 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2315 |
94.2% |
0.94220594 |
r16skolehelse4_4
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Social/familial challenges
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social or familial challenges
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social or familial challenges |
111 |
4.5% |
0.04517705 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2346 |
95.5% |
0.95482295 |
r16skolehelse4_5
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: General well-being
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
General well-being, interaction with others
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
General well-being, interaction with others |
161 |
6.6% |
0.06552707 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2296 |
93.4% |
0.93447293 |
r16skolehelse4_6
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Growth/development/physical
health
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Growth, development or physical health
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Growth, development or physical health |
315 |
12.8% |
0.1282051 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2142 |
87.2% |
0.8717949 |
r16skolehelse4_7
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Accident/injury at school
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Accident/injury at school
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Accident/injury at school |
285 |
11.6% |
0.1159951 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2172 |
88.4% |
0.8840049 |
r16skolehelse4_8
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Intoxication
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Intoxication
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intoxication |
22 |
0.9% |
0.008954009 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2435 |
99.1% |
0.991045991 |
r16skolehelse4_9
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Cannot remember
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cannot remember
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Cannot remember |
112 |
4.6% |
0.04558405 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2345 |
95.4% |
0.95441595 |
r16skolehelse4_10
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Never been in contact
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have never been in contact with school health services
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Have never been in contact with school health services |
307 |
12.5% |
0.1249491 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2150 |
87.5% |
0.8750509 |
r16skolehelse4_11
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other |
64 |
2.6% |
0.02604803 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2393 |
97.4% |
0.97395197 |
r16skolehelse4_12
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Do not wish to answer
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do not wish to answer
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Do not wish to answer |
38 |
1.5% |
0.01546602 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2419 |
98.5% |
0.98453398 |
r16skolehelse4_11_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R16SKOLEHELSE4_11] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of
these purposes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16skolehelse5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your municipality should use more/less on: School health service
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public services can be expensive, and it is not always possible to
prioritise all services equally, even if they are considered important.
To what extent would you like your municipality to use more or fewer
resources on the following schemes:
|
|
Literal question:
|
School health service
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Spend a lot more money |
442 |
18.0% |
0.179894180 |
| 2 |
Spend a little more money |
975 |
39.7% |
0.396825397 |
| 3 |
Spend as much money as now |
872 |
35.5% |
0.354904355 |
| 4 |
Spend a little less money |
47 |
1.9% |
0.019129019 |
| 5 |
Spend a lot less money |
16 |
0.7% |
0.006512007 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
105 |
4.3% |
0.042735043 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Your municipality should use more/less on: School teachers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public services can be expensive, and it is not always possible to
prioritise all services equally, even if they are considered important.
To what extent would you like your municipality to use more or fewer
resources on the following schemes:
|
|
Literal question:
|
School teachers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Spend a lot more money |
690 |
28.1% |
0.280830281 |
| 2 |
Spend a little more money |
1040 |
42.3% |
0.423280423 |
| 3 |
Spend as much money as now |
598 |
24.3% |
0.243386243 |
| 4 |
Spend a little less money |
36 |
1.5% |
0.014652015 |
| 5 |
Spend a lot less money |
9 |
0.4% |
0.003663004 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
84 |
3.4% |
0.034188034 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Your municipality should use more/less on: Care for the elderly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public services can be expensive, and it is not always possible to
prioritise all services equally, even if they are considered important.
To what extent would you like your municipality to use more or fewer
resources on the following schemes:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Care for the elderly
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Spend a lot more money |
863 |
35.1% |
0.351241351 |
| 2 |
Spend a little more money |
1020 |
41.5% |
0.415140415 |
| 3 |
Spend as much money as now |
481 |
19.6% |
0.195767196 |
| 4 |
Spend a little less money |
33 |
1.3% |
0.013431013 |
| 5 |
Spend a lot less money |
13 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
47 |
1.9% |
0.019129019 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse5_4
|
Variable label:
|
Your municipality should use more/less on: Culture/leisure facilities
for children/young people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public services can be expensive, and it is not always possible to
prioritise all services equally, even if they are considered important.
To what extent would you like your municipality to use more or fewer
resources on the following schemes:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cultural and leisure facilities/activities for children and young people
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Spend a lot more money |
488 |
19.9% |
0.198616199 |
| 2 |
Spend a little more money |
891 |
36.3% |
0.362637363 |
| 3 |
Spend as much money as now |
849 |
34.6% |
0.345543346 |
| 4 |
Spend a little less money |
119 |
4.8% |
0.048433048 |
| 5 |
Spend a lot less money |
23 |
0.9% |
0.009361009 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
3.5% |
0.035409035 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse5_5
|
Variable label:
|
Your municipality should use more/less on: Bicycle paths/public
transport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public services can be expensive, and it is not always possible to
prioritise all services equally, even if they are considered important.
To what extent would you like your municipality to use more or fewer
resources on the following schemes:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Bicycle paths and public transport
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Spend a lot more money |
454 |
18.5% |
0.18477818 |
| 2 |
Spend a little more money |
784 |
31.9% |
0.31908832 |
| 3 |
Spend as much money as now |
803 |
32.7% |
0.32682133 |
| 4 |
Spend a little less money |
221 |
9.0% |
0.08994709 |
| 5 |
Spend a lot less money |
97 |
3.9% |
0.03947904 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
98 |
4.0% |
0.03988604 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs_anlegg
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects
value for r16km_ccs_anlegg.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects
value for r16km_ccs_anlegg.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4185] [Invalid:8719]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
1029 |
24.6% |
0.2458781 |
| 2 |
from Norwegian installations/plants |
1066 |
25.5% |
0.2547192 |
| 3 |
from German installations/plants |
1023 |
24.4% |
0.2444444 |
| 4 |
from European installations/plants |
1067 |
25.5% |
0.2549582 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8719 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs_lagring
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects
value for r16km_ccs_anlegg.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects
value for r16km_ccs_anlegg.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4185] [Invalid:8719]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the ground |
2059 |
49.2% |
0.4919952 |
| 2 |
the seabed |
2126 |
50.8% |
0.5080048 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8719 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs_territorium
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects
value for r16km_ccs_anlegg.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects
value for r16km_ccs_anlegg.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4185] [Invalid:8719]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
1411 |
33.7% |
0.3371565 |
| 2 |
in Norwegian territory |
1375 |
32.9% |
0.3285544 |
| 3 |
in European territory |
1399 |
33.4% |
0.3342891 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8719 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs
|
Variable label:
|
Carbon capture: How would you feel about such a project?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Carbon capture and storage is a process of storing CO2 (carbon
dioxide) captured at industrial installations and power plants that emit
large amounts of CO2 during production processes. Captured CO2 is
transported and stored deep under the ground so that it does not reach
the atmosphere where it would contribute to climate change. This
technology is already in use today. Research suggests that this
technology can be further developed so that large amounts of CO2 can be
captured and stored in the future. On a large scale, carbon capture and
storage can play an important role in limiting climate change.
Imagine a proposal where large amounts of CO2 [blank/ from Norwegian
installations/ plants from German installations/plants/ from European
installations/plants] is to be stored deep below [the ground/ the
seabed] [blank/ in Norwegian territory/ in European territory]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you feel about such a project?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 or 7. Experiment. The wording of the question
depends on the randomized values of r16km_ccs_anlegg, r16km_ccs_lagring
and r16km_ccs_territorium.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
1007 |
24.1% |
0.240621266 |
| 2 |
Slightly positive |
1274 |
30.4% |
0.304420550 |
| 3 |
Slightly negative |
677 |
16.2% |
0.161768220 |
| 4 |
Very negative |
444 |
10.6% |
0.106093190 |
| 5 |
No opinion/do not know |
778 |
18.6% |
0.185902031 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.1% |
0.001194743 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8719 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs_a
|
Variable label:
|
Carbon capture: How realistic to carry out such a project the next 5-10
years?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How realistic do you think it is that such a project will be carried out
during the next 5-10 years?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 or 7 and r16km_ccs is answered. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Realistic |
2167 |
51.8% |
0.51842105 |
| 2 |
Not realistic |
1930 |
46.2% |
0.46172249 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
2.0% |
0.01985646 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8724 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs_b
|
Variable label:
|
Carbon capture: An effective means of limiting climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think carbon capture and storage will be an effective means of
limiting climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1469 |
35.1% |
0.351015532 |
| 2 |
No |
947 |
22.6% |
0.226284349 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
1745 |
41.7% |
0.416965352 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.6% |
0.005734767 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8719 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs_open
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Comments on the questions about carbon capture [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments on the questions about carbon capture, please
write them here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 or 7. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16km_tech
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Technological innovations will solve climate problems
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statement below. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will solve climate problems.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
107 |
6.2% |
0.061921296 |
| 2 |
Agree |
296 |
17.1% |
0.171296296 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
754 |
43.6% |
0.436342593 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
223 |
12.9% |
0.129050926 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
177 |
10.2% |
0.102430556 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
130 |
7.5% |
0.075231481 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
38 |
2.2% |
0.021990741 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001736111 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16km_wind_a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More land-based windmills should be built in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please consider these statements about wind power in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
More land-based windmills should be built in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
167 |
9.7% |
0.096643519 |
| 2 |
Agree |
293 |
17.0% |
0.169560185 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
379 |
21.9% |
0.219328704 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
139 |
8.0% |
0.080439815 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
204 |
11.8% |
0.118055556 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
220 |
12.7% |
0.127314815 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
320 |
18.5% |
0.185185185 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003472222 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16km_wind_b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More sea-based windmills should be built in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
More sea-based windmills should be built in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
426 |
24.7% |
0.246527778 |
| 2 |
Agree |
544 |
31.5% |
0.314814815 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
378 |
21.9% |
0.218750000 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
110 |
6.4% |
0.063657407 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
99 |
5.7% |
0.057291667 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
78 |
4.5% |
0.045138889 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
87 |
5.0% |
0.050347222 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003472222 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg1
|
Variable label:
|
What is your opinion regarding oil exploration in the Barents Sea?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion regarding oil exploration in the Barents Sea?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It should be permitted |
763 |
44.2% |
0.44155093 |
| 2 |
It should be prohibited |
940 |
54.4% |
0.54398148 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.4% |
0.01446759 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg2
|
Variable label:
|
How important is this matter to you personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is this matter to you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 and r16padproleg1 is answered. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
258 |
15.1% |
0.151497358 |
| 2 |
Important |
483 |
28.4% |
0.283617146 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
571 |
33.5% |
0.335290664 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
331 |
19.4% |
0.194362889 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
54 |
3.2% |
0.031708749 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003523194 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11201 |
|
NA |
r16meme5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about rich people: Admiration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about rich
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about rich
people as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01179245 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
120 |
7.1% |
0.07075472 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
611 |
36.0% |
0.36025943 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
500 |
29.5% |
0.29481132 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
407 |
24.0% |
0.23997642 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.2% |
0.02240566 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about rich people: Compassion
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about rich
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about rich
people as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005896226 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
55 |
3.2% |
0.032429245 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
298 |
17.6% |
0.175707547 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
492 |
29.0% |
0.290094340 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
772 |
45.5% |
0.455188679 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
69 |
4.1% |
0.040683962 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about rich people: Feel sorry for them
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about rich
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about rich
people as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for them
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004716981 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
17 |
1.0% |
0.010023585 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
148 |
8.7% |
0.087264151 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
454 |
26.8% |
0.267688679 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
1001 |
59.0% |
0.590212264 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
68 |
4.0% |
0.040094340 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme5_4
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about rich people: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about rich
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about rich
people as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004716981 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
33 |
1.9% |
0.019457547 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
150 |
8.8% |
0.088443396 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
433 |
25.5% |
0.255306604 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
1007 |
59.4% |
0.593750000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
65 |
3.8% |
0.038325472 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme5_5
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about rich people: Envy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about rich
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about rich
people as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005896226 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
42 |
2.5% |
0.024764151 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
341 |
20.1% |
0.201061321 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
600 |
35.4% |
0.353773585 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
645 |
38.0% |
0.380306604 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
3.4% |
0.034198113 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme5_6
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about rich people: Bitterness
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about rich
people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about rich
people as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Bitterness
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007075472 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008254717 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
112 |
6.6% |
0.066037736 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
413 |
24.4% |
0.243514151 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
1074 |
63.3% |
0.633254717 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
4.2% |
0.041863208 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about the middle class: Admiration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about the middle
class. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
middle class as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
124 |
7.3% |
0.073113208 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
444 |
26.2% |
0.261792453 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
430 |
25.4% |
0.253537736 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
641 |
37.8% |
0.377948113 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
2.4% |
0.024174528 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about the middle class: Compassion
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about the middle
class. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
middle class as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
28 |
1.7% |
0.01650943 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
106 |
6.2% |
0.06250000 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
353 |
20.8% |
0.20813679 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
374 |
22.1% |
0.22051887 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
771 |
45.5% |
0.45459906 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
3.8% |
0.03773585 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about the middle class: Feel sorry for them
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about the middle
class. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
middle class as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for them
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001768868 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
20 |
1.2% |
0.011792453 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
122 |
7.2% |
0.071933962 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
420 |
24.8% |
0.247641509 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
1055 |
62.2% |
0.622051887 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
76 |
4.5% |
0.044811321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about the middle class: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about the middle
class. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
middle class as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001179245 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003537736 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
42 |
2.5% |
0.024764151 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
299 |
17.6% |
0.176297170 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
1267 |
74.7% |
0.747051887 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
80 |
4.7% |
0.047169811 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about the middle class: Envy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about the middle
class. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
middle class as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001768868 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
55 |
3.2% |
0.032429245 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
360 |
21.2% |
0.212264151 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
1196 |
70.5% |
0.705188679 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
77 |
4.5% |
0.045400943 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about the middle class: Bitterness
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about the middle
class. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the
middle class as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Bitterness
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001768868 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
37 |
2.2% |
0.021816038 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
258 |
15.2% |
0.152122642 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
1315 |
77.5% |
0.775353774 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
78 |
4.6% |
0.045990566 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about people who receive benefits: Admiration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about people who
receive benefits. To what extent do you have the following feelings
about people who receive benefits as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
68 |
4.0% |
0.040094340 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
304 |
17.9% |
0.179245283 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
388 |
22.9% |
0.228773585 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
842 |
49.6% |
0.496462264 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
78 |
4.6% |
0.045990566 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme7_2
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about people who receive benefits: Compassion
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Nå kommer noen spørsmål om hva du personlig føler om folk som lever på
trygd. I hvilken grad har du følgende følelser om folk som lever på
trygd?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
98 |
5.8% |
0.05778302 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
364 |
21.5% |
0.21462264 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
866 |
51.1% |
0.51061321 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
194 |
11.4% |
0.11438679 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
138 |
8.1% |
0.08136792 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
2.1% |
0.02122642 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme7_3
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about people who receive benefits: Feel sorry for them
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Nå kommer noen spørsmål om hva du personlig føler om folk som lever på
trygd. I hvilken grad har du følgende følelser om folk som lever på
trygd?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for them
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
61 |
3.6% |
0.03596698 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
257 |
15.2% |
0.15153302 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
883 |
52.1% |
0.52063679 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
273 |
16.1% |
0.16096698 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
171 |
10.1% |
0.10082547 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
3.0% |
0.03007075 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme7_4
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about people who receive benefits: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Nå kommer noen spørsmål om hva du personlig føler om folk som lever på
trygd. I hvilken grad har du følgende følelser om folk som lever på
trygd?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001768868 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
22 |
1.3% |
0.012971698 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
145 |
8.5% |
0.085495283 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
373 |
22.0% |
0.219929245 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
1076 |
63.4% |
0.634433962 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
77 |
4.5% |
0.045400943 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme7_5
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about people who receive benefits: Envy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Nå kommer noen spørsmål om hva du personlig føler om folk som lever på
trygd. I hvilken grad har du følgende følelser om folk som lever på
trygd?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005896226 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
6 |
0.4% |
0.0035377358 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
34 |
2.0% |
0.0200471698 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
132 |
7.8% |
0.0778301887 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
1442 |
85.0% |
0.8502358491 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
4.8% |
0.0477594340 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme7_6
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about people who receive benefits: Bitterness
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Nå kommer noen spørsmål om hva du personlig føler om folk som lever på
trygd. I hvilken grad har du følgende følelser om folk som lever på
trygd?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Bitterness
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001179245 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
22 |
1.3% |
0.012971698 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
98 |
5.8% |
0.057783019 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
257 |
15.2% |
0.151533019 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
1236 |
72.9% |
0.728773585 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
4.8% |
0.047759434 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Budget priorities: Education for unemployed people rather than
unemployment benefits
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politics often involves having to prioritise different measures and
schemes so that budgets are met. Below, you will see some political
proposals about priorities, all of which will affect government budgets.
We would like you to consider these and decide how good or bad each of
the proposals are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Authorities should prioritise the education and training of unemployed
people rather than unemployment benefits.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Good proposal |
626 |
36.9% |
0.369103774 |
| 2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
662 |
39.0% |
0.390330189 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
260 |
15.3% |
0.153301887 |
| 4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
101 |
6.0% |
0.059551887 |
| 5 |
Bad proposal |
40 |
2.4% |
0.023584906 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004127358 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Budget priorities: More money in higher education, even if that means
more taxes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politics often involves having to prioritise different measures and
schemes so that budgets are met. Below, you will see some political
proposals about priorities, all of which will affect government budgets.
We would like you to consider these and decide how good or bad each of
the proposals are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Authorities should invest more money in higher education even if it
means that we have to pay more taxes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Good proposal |
330 |
19.5% |
0.194575472 |
| 2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
557 |
32.8% |
0.328419811 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
470 |
27.7% |
0.277122642 |
| 4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
217 |
12.8% |
0.127948113 |
| 5 |
Bad proposal |
112 |
6.6% |
0.066037736 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005896226 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Budget priorities: Replace universal child benefit with free
kindergartens/After-School Programmes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politics often involves having to prioritise different measures and
schemes so that budgets are met. Below, you will see some political
proposals about priorities, all of which will affect government budgets.
We would like you to consider these and decide how good or bad each of
the proposals are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Authorities should replace universal child benefit with free
kindergartens and After-School Programmes for all children.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Good proposal |
441 |
26.0% |
0.260023585 |
| 2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
465 |
27.4% |
0.274174528 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
327 |
19.3% |
0.192806604 |
| 4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
239 |
14.1% |
0.140919811 |
| 5 |
Bad proposal |
216 |
12.7% |
0.127358491 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004716981 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Taxes should be increased for those who earn the most
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a number of political proposals that relate to the amount of
money the government should receive and pay out. Therefore, the
proposals will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider
these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taxes should be increased for those who earn the most.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Good proposal |
758 |
44.7% |
0.446933962 |
| 2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
531 |
31.3% |
0.313089623 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
210 |
12.4% |
0.123820755 |
| 4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
112 |
6.6% |
0.066037736 |
| 5 |
Bad proposal |
77 |
4.5% |
0.045400943 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004716981 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Inheritance tax should be reintroduced
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a number of political proposals that relate to the amount of
money the government should receive and pay out. Therefore, the
proposals will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider
these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Inheritance tax should be reintroduced
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Good proposal |
149 |
8.8% |
0.087853774 |
| 2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
182 |
10.7% |
0.107311321 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
232 |
13.7% |
0.136792453 |
| 4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
274 |
16.2% |
0.161556604 |
| 5 |
Bad proposal |
846 |
49.9% |
0.498820755 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.8% |
0.007665094 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: The wealth tax should be abolished
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a number of political proposals that relate to the amount of
money the government should receive and pay out. Therefore, the
proposals will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider
these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The wealth tax should be abolished.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Good proposal |
321 |
18.9% |
0.189268868 |
| 2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
274 |
16.2% |
0.161556604 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
302 |
17.8% |
0.178066038 |
| 4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
372 |
21.9% |
0.219339623 |
| 5 |
Bad proposal |
422 |
24.9% |
0.248820755 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Fewer differences in the payment of old-age pensions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a number of political proposals that relate to the amount of
money the government should receive and pay out. Therefore, the
proposals will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider
these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
There should be fewer differences in the payment of old-age pensions
between those with low pensions and those with high pensions
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Good proposal |
403 |
23.8% |
0.237617925 |
| 2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
520 |
30.7% |
0.306603774 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
391 |
23.1% |
0.230542453 |
| 4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
238 |
14.0% |
0.140330189 |
| 5 |
Bad proposal |
135 |
8.0% |
0.079599057 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005306604 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Deductible mortgage interest should be retained
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a number of political proposals that relate to the amount of
money the government should receive and pay out. Therefore, the
proposals will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider
these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Deductible mortgage interest should be retained.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Good proposal |
976 |
57.5% |
0.575471698 |
| 2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
396 |
23.3% |
0.233490566 |
| 3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
205 |
12.1% |
0.120872642 |
| 4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
78 |
4.6% |
0.045990566 |
| 5 |
Bad proposal |
29 |
1.7% |
0.017099057 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007075472 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme3_order
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects order
of r16meme3_1 and r16meme3_2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects order
of r16meme3_1 and r16meme3_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1696] [Invalid:11208]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
r16meme3_1 first |
861 |
50.8% |
0.5076651 |
| 2 |
r16meme3_2 first |
835 |
49.2% |
0.4923349 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Large differences in income necessary to reward
talent/effort
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Large differences in people’s incomes are necessary in order to reward
talent and effort.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of r16meme3_1 and r16meme3_2 is
randomized. See background variable.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
62 |
3.7% |
0.036556604 |
| 2 |
Agree |
217 |
12.8% |
0.127948113 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
523 |
30.8% |
0.308372642 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
172 |
10.1% |
0.101415094 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
277 |
16.3% |
0.163325472 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
268 |
15.8% |
0.158018868 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
174 |
10.3% |
0.102594340 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001768868 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agrees/disagrees: Should be slight differences in people’s living
standards for society to be fair
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
In order for a society to be fair, there should be slight differences in
people’s living standards.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of r16meme3_1 and r16meme3_2 is
randomized. See background variable.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
271 |
16.0% |
0.159787736 |
| 2 |
Agree |
461 |
27.2% |
0.271816038 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
462 |
27.2% |
0.272405660 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
149 |
8.8% |
0.087853774 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
205 |
12.1% |
0.120872642 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
114 |
6.7% |
0.067216981 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
30 |
1.8% |
0.017688679 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002358491 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme4_order
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects the
order of r16meme4_1 and r16meme4_2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects the
order of r16meme4_1 and r16meme4_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1696] [Invalid:11208]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
r16meme4_1 first |
861 |
50.8% |
0.5076651 |
| 2 |
r16meme4_2 first |
835 |
49.2% |
0.4923349 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Most unemployed people don’t really try to find a job
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Most unemployed people don’t really try to find a job.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of r16meme4_1 and r16meme4_2 is
randomized. See background variable.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
24 |
1.4% |
0.014150943 |
| 2 |
Agree |
54 |
3.2% |
0.031839623 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
241 |
14.2% |
0.142099057 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
285 |
16.8% |
0.168042453 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
325 |
19.2% |
0.191627358 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
536 |
31.6% |
0.316037736 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
226 |
13.3% |
0.133254717 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Many receive benefits/services that they are not
entitled to
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Many people receive benefits and services that they are not really
entitled to.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of r16meme4_1 and r16meme4_2 is
randomized. See background variable.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
89 |
5.2% |
0.052476415 |
| 2 |
Agree |
162 |
9.6% |
0.095518868 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
404 |
23.8% |
0.238207547 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
389 |
22.9% |
0.229363208 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
215 |
12.7% |
0.126768868 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
306 |
18.0% |
0.180424528 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
125 |
7.4% |
0.073702830 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003537736 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme8_1
|
Variable label:
|
Does the group have more/less money than deserved: Poor people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For each of the following groups, please answer if they have more money
than they deserve, less money than they deserve or roughly the amount of
money they deserve.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Poor people
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money than they deserve |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
| 2 |
Somewhat more money than they deserve |
32 |
1.9% |
0.018867925 |
| 3 |
Roughly the amount of money they deserve |
218 |
12.9% |
0.128537736 |
| 4 |
Somewhat less money than they deserve |
714 |
42.1% |
0.420990566 |
| 5 |
Much less money than they deserve |
693 |
40.9% |
0.408608491 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2.0% |
0.020047170 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme8_2
|
Variable label:
|
Does the group have more/less money than deserved: Rich people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For each of the following groups, please answer if they have more money
than they deserve, less money than they deserve or roughly the amount of
money they deserve.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Rich people
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money than they deserve |
475 |
28.0% |
0.280070755 |
| 2 |
Somewhat more money than they deserve |
634 |
37.4% |
0.373820755 |
| 3 |
Roughly the amount of money they deserve |
523 |
30.8% |
0.308372642 |
| 4 |
Somewhat less money than they deserve |
21 |
1.2% |
0.012382075 |
| 5 |
Much less money than they deserve |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.2% |
0.022405660 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme8_3
|
Variable label:
|
Does the group have more/less money than deserved: The middle class
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For each of the following groups, please answer if they have more money
than they deserve, less money than they deserve or roughly the amount of
money they deserve.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The middle class
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money than they deserve |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003537736 |
| 2 |
Somewhat more money than they deserve |
127 |
7.5% |
0.074882075 |
| 3 |
Roughly the amount of money they deserve |
1316 |
77.6% |
0.775943396 |
| 4 |
Somewhat less money than they deserve |
190 |
11.2% |
0.112028302 |
| 5 |
Much less money than they deserve |
21 |
1.2% |
0.012382075 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
2.1% |
0.021226415 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme8_4
|
Variable label:
|
Does the group have more/less money than deserved: The working class
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For each of the following groups, please answer if they have more money
than they deserve, less money than they deserve or roughly the amount of
money they deserve.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The working class
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money than they deserve |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
| 2 |
Somewhat more money than they deserve |
49 |
2.9% |
0.028891509 |
| 3 |
Roughly the amount of money they deserve |
963 |
56.8% |
0.567806604 |
| 4 |
Somewhat less money than they deserve |
563 |
33.2% |
0.331957547 |
| 5 |
Much less money than they deserve |
74 |
4.4% |
0.043632075 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2.5% |
0.024764151 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme8_5
|
Variable label:
|
Does the group have more/less money than deserved: People who receive
benefits
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For each of the following groups, please answer if they have more money
than they deserve, less money than they deserve or roughly the amount of
money they deserve.
|
|
Literal question:
|
People who receive benefits
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is
randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money than they deserve |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01179245 |
| 2 |
Somewhat more money than they deserve |
97 |
5.7% |
0.05719340 |
| 3 |
Roughly the amount of money they deserve |
644 |
38.0% |
0.37971698 |
| 4 |
Somewhat less money than they deserve |
705 |
41.6% |
0.41568396 |
| 5 |
Much less money than they deserve |
190 |
11.2% |
0.11202830 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.4% |
0.02358491 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme9
|
Variable label:
|
Where do you place yourself on a ladder that illustrates the hierarchy
of society?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that this is a ladder that shows how Norwegian society is
divided. At the top of the ladder are people who are best placed in
society - those who have the most money, the most education and jobs
that gain the most respect. At the bottom of the ladder are people who
are worst placed - those who have the least money, have little or no
education, have jobs that gain the least respect or don’t have jobs at
all. The higher you are on this ladder, the closer you are to those who
are at the very top. The lower you are, the closer you are to those at
the very bottom.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a ladder?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark the step that you think you are standing on at this point in your
life compared to others in Norwegian society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. Respondents are shown an illustration of a
ladder with numbered response options from 10 to 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003537736 |
| 2 |
2 |
30 |
1.8% |
0.017688679 |
| 3 |
3 |
49 |
2.9% |
0.028891509 |
| 4 |
4 |
139 |
8.2% |
0.081957547 |
| 5 |
5 |
258 |
15.2% |
0.152122642 |
| 6 |
6 |
459 |
27.1% |
0.270636792 |
| 7 |
7 |
480 |
28.3% |
0.283018868 |
| 8 |
8 |
222 |
13.1% |
0.130896226 |
| 9 |
9 |
42 |
2.5% |
0.024764151 |
| 10 |
10 |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001179245 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005306604 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16kreft6
|
Variable label:
|
We would now like to know how many children you have at present?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would now like to know how many children you have at present?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click “Next” if you do not wish to answer this question.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 or 4 and r16P1 = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
415 |
24.0% |
0.23960739 |
| 1 |
1 |
239 |
13.8% |
0.13799076 |
| 2 |
2 |
639 |
36.9% |
0.36893764 |
| 3 |
3 |
329 |
19.0% |
0.18995381 |
| 4 |
4 or more |
79 |
4.6% |
0.04561201 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.8% |
0.01789838 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11172 |
|
NA |
r16km_skog2_a
|
Variable label:
|
Image evaluation: Which landscape did you like best?
(grazed/overgrown/spruce forests)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now display three sets with three landscape images in each set.
The image montages below show how the same landscape will typically look
when it is grazed, when it becomes overgrown on its own accord or when
it is planted with spruce forests. (This is screen 1 of 3.) You will get
the opportunity to write comments after set no. 3.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which landscape image do you like best?
|
|
Post-question:
|
(Note: The images consist of one photograph underneath with manipulated
landscapes on top. You will get the opportunity to write comments
later.)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Respondents are shown a set of pictures of
landscapes (set #1). Please contact Endre Tvinnereim (entv@norceresearch.no) for more information.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Picture 1: Grazed |
903 |
79.7% |
0.796999117 |
| 2 |
Picture 2: Overgrown |
136 |
12.0% |
0.120035305 |
| 3 |
Picture 3: Spruce forests |
59 |
5.2% |
0.052074139 |
| 4 |
Do not know/no opinion/do not wish to answer |
24 |
2.1% |
0.021182701 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.0% |
0.009708738 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_skog2_b
|
Variable label:
|
Image evaluation: Which landscape did you like best?
(grazed/overgrown/spruce forests)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The images below show how the same landscape will typically look when it
is grazed, when it becomes overgrown on its own accord or when it is
planted with spruce forests.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which landscape image do you like best?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Respondents are shown a set of pictures of
landscapes (set #2). Please contact Endre Tvinnereim (entv@norceresearch.no) for more information.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Picture 1: Grazed |
861 |
76.0% |
0.759929391 |
| 2 |
Picture 2: Overgrown |
168 |
14.8% |
0.148278906 |
| 3 |
Picture 3: Spruce forests |
78 |
6.9% |
0.068843778 |
| 4 |
Do not know/no opinion/do not wish to answer |
19 |
1.7% |
0.016769638 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006178288 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_skog2_c
|
Variable label:
|
Image evaluation: Which landscape did you like best?
(grazed/overgrown/spruce forests)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The images below show how the same landscape will typically look when it
is grazed, when it becomes overgrown on its own accord or when it is
planted with spruce forests.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which landscape image do you like best?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Respondents are shown a set of pictures of
landscapes (set #3). Please contact Endre Tvinnereim (entv@norceresearch.no) for more information.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Picture 1: Grazed |
761 |
67.2% |
0.671668138 |
| 2 |
Picture 2: Overgrown |
274 |
24.2% |
0.241835834 |
| 3 |
Picture 3: Spruce forests |
72 |
6.4% |
0.063548102 |
| 4 |
Do not know/no opinion/do not wish to answer |
17 |
1.5% |
0.015004413 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007943513 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_skog2_d
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Explain preferred landscape [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Here you can explain your choices:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Respondents are shown a set of pictures of
landscapes (set #3).]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16km_skog3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Betydningfullt for deg: How nice the landscape looked
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the
most?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How nice the landscape looked
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c
is answered ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
How nice the landscape looked |
541 |
47.9% |
0.4787611 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
589 |
52.1% |
0.5212389 |
r16km_skog3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Accessibility in the landscape
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the
most?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Accessibility in the landscape
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c
is answered ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Accessibility in the landscape |
481 |
42.6% |
0.4256637 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
649 |
57.4% |
0.5743363 |
r16km_skog3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Important for you: That the landscape is used for forestry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the
most?
|
|
Literal question:
|
That the landscape is used for forestry
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c
is answered ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
That the landscape is used for forestry |
67 |
5.9% |
0.05929204 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1063 |
94.1% |
0.94070796 |
r16km_skog3_4
|
Variable label:
|
Important for you: That the landscape is used for grazing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the
most?
|
|
Literal question:
|
That the landscape is used for grazing
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c
is answered ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
That the landscape is used for grazing |
640 |
56.6% |
0.5663717 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
490 |
43.4% |
0.4336283 |
r16km_skog3_5
|
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Natural diversity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the
most?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Natural diversity
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c
is answered ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Natural diversity |
371 |
32.8% |
0.3283186 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
759 |
67.2% |
0.6716814 |
r16km_skog3_6
|
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Cultivated landscape
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the
most?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cultivated landscape
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c
is answered ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Cultivated landscape |
532 |
47.1% |
0.4707965 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
598 |
52.9% |
0.5292035 |
r16km_skog3_7
|
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Absorption of greenhouse gases in vegetation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the
most?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Absorption of greenhouse gases in vegetation
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c
is answered ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Absorption of greenhouse gases in vegetation |
130 |
11.5% |
0.1150442 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1000 |
88.5% |
0.8849558 |
r16km_skog3_8
|
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Risk of forest fire
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the
most?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Risk of forest fire
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c
is answered ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Risk of forest fire |
21 |
1.9% |
0.01858407 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1109 |
98.1% |
0.98141593 |
r16km_skog3_9
|
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Other factors
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the
most?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other factors
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c
is answered ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other factors |
46 |
4.1% |
0.04070796 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1084 |
95.9% |
0.95929204 |
r16km_skog3_10
|
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Don’t know
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the
most?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t know
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c
is answered ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Don't know |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01238938 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1116 |
98.8% |
0.98761062 |
r16km_skog4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: Planted spruce forest
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When
you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of
landscapes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Planted spruce forest
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Planted spruce forest |
378 |
33.4% |
0.3336275 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
755 |
66.6% |
0.6663725 |
r16km_skog4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: Grazing pasture
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When
you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of
landscapes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Grazing pasture
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Grazing pasture |
533 |
47.0% |
0.4704325 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
600 |
53.0% |
0.5295675 |
r16km_skog4_3
|
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: Grazing pasture overgrown with forest
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When
you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of
landscapes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Grazing pasture overgrown with forest, or that is about to become
overgrown
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Grazing pasture overgrown with forest, or that is about to become overgrown |
292 |
25.8% |
0.2577229 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
841 |
74.2% |
0.7422771 |
r16km_skog4_4
|
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: Agriculture
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When
you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of
landscapes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Agriculture
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agriculture |
556 |
49.1% |
0.4907326 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
577 |
50.9% |
0.5092674 |
r16km_skog4_5
|
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: Deciduous forest
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When
you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of
landscapes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Deciduous forest
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Deciduous forest |
384 |
33.9% |
0.3389232 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
749 |
66.1% |
0.6610768 |
r16km_skog4_6
|
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: None of these
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When
you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of
landscapes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
None of these
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None of these |
253 |
22.3% |
0.223301 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
880 |
77.7% |
0.776699 |
r16km_skog4_7
|
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: Don’t know
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When
you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of
landscapes?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t know
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Don't know |
8 |
0.7% |
0.0070609 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1125 |
99.3% |
0.9929391 |
r16km_skog5
|
Variable label:
|
Are you a member of an outdoor/recreational/ environmental organisation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you a member of an outdoor/recreational and/or environmental
organisation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
256 |
22.6% |
0.225948808 |
| 2 |
No |
872 |
77.0% |
0.769638129 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001765225 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002647838 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_skog6_1
|
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Agriculture that involves grazing livestock
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Agriculture that involves grazing livestock
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agriculture that involves grazing livestock |
122 |
10.8% |
0.1076787 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1011 |
89.2% |
0.8923213 |
r16km_skog6_2
|
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Agriculture that doesn’t involve grazing
livestock
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Agriculture that doesn’t involve grazing livestock
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agriculture that doesn't involve grazing livestock |
65 |
5.7% |
0.05736981 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1068 |
94.3% |
0.94263019 |
r16km_skog6_3
|
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Tourist industry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tourist industry
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Tourist industry |
37 |
3.3% |
0.03265666 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1096 |
96.7% |
0.96734334 |
r16km_skog6_4
|
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Forestry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Forestry
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Forestry |
78 |
6.9% |
0.06884378 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1055 |
93.1% |
0.93115622 |
r16km_skog6_5
|
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Research or education within
agriculture/tourist industry/forestry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Research or education within the above areas
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Research or education within the above areas |
30 |
2.6% |
0.02647838 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1103 |
97.4% |
0.97352162 |
r16km_skog6_6
|
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Not in agriculture/tourist industry/forestry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
|
Literal question:
|
No, neither I nor anyone else in my family work in any of the industries
above
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No, neither I nor anyone else in my family work in any of the industries above |
897 |
79.2% |
0.7917034 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
236 |
20.8% |
0.2082966 |
r16km_skog6_7
|
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Don’t know
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t know
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Don't know |
4 |
0.4% |
0.00353045 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1129 |
99.6% |
0.99646955 |
r16km_privacy_1
|
Variable label:
|
How worried about: Internet companies use of private data
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of some current issues being discussed in the media. We
would like to know how much you personally worry about each of these
issues.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How internet companies use private/personal data
|
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the issue that you are personally
worried about the most, then the issue that worries you the second most
and so on, until you have ranked all five issues. If you change your
mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Ranking where 1 is “most worried” and 5 is
“least worried”. The order of the response options is randomized. Should
be viewed in conjuction with r16km_privacy_none which appeared as an
independent response option just below the rankings.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
171 |
15.1% |
0.15092674 |
| 2 |
2 |
274 |
24.2% |
0.24183583 |
| 3 |
3 |
283 |
25.0% |
0.24977935 |
| 4 |
4 |
142 |
12.5% |
0.12533098 |
| 5 |
5 |
109 |
9.6% |
0.09620477 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
154 |
13.6% |
0.13592233 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_privacy_2
|
Variable label:
|
How worried about: The financial situation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of some current issues being discussed in the media. We
would like to know how much you personally worry about each of these
issues.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The financial situation
|
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the issue that you are personally
worried about the most, then the issue that worries you the second most
and so on, until you have ranked all five issues. If you change your
mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Ranking where 1 is “most worried” and 5 is
“least worried”. The order of the response options is randomized. Should
be viewed in conjuction with r16km_privacy_none which appeared as an
independent response option just below the rankings.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
88 |
7.8% |
0.0776699 |
| 2 |
2 |
177 |
15.6% |
0.1562224 |
| 3 |
3 |
228 |
20.1% |
0.2012357 |
| 4 |
4 |
249 |
22.0% |
0.2197705 |
| 5 |
5 |
171 |
15.1% |
0.1509267 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
220 |
19.4% |
0.1941748 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_privacy_3
|
Variable label:
|
How worried about: Climate change
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of some current issues being discussed in the media. We
would like to know how much you personally worry about each of these
issues.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Climate change
|
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the issue that you are personally
worried about the most, then the issue that worries you the second most
and so on, until you have ranked all five issues. If you change your
mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Ranking where 1 is “most worried” and 5 is
“least worried”. The order of the response options is randomized. Should
be viewed in conjuction with r16km_privacy_none which appeared as an
independent response option just below the rankings.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
507 |
44.7% |
0.44748455 |
| 2 |
2 |
219 |
19.3% |
0.19329214 |
| 3 |
3 |
113 |
10.0% |
0.09973522 |
| 4 |
4 |
80 |
7.1% |
0.07060900 |
| 5 |
5 |
94 |
8.3% |
0.08296558 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
120 |
10.6% |
0.10591350 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_privacy_4
|
Variable label:
|
How worried about: Immigration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of some current issues being discussed in the media. We
would like to know how much you personally worry about each of these
issues.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigration
|
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the issue that you are personally
worried about the most, then the issue that worries you the second most
and so on, until you have ranked all five issues. If you change your
mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Ranking where 1 is “most worried” and 5 is
“least worried”. The order of the response options is randomized. Should
be viewed in conjuction with r16km_privacy_none which appeared as an
independent response option just below the rankings.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
118 |
10.4% |
0.1041483 |
| 2 |
2 |
104 |
9.2% |
0.0917917 |
| 3 |
3 |
127 |
11.2% |
0.1120918 |
| 4 |
4 |
189 |
16.7% |
0.1668138 |
| 5 |
5 |
344 |
30.4% |
0.3036187 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
251 |
22.2% |
0.2215357 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_privacy_5
|
Variable label:
|
How worried about: Terrorism
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of some current issues being discussed in the media. We
would like to know how much you personally worry about each of these
issues.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Terrorism
|
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the issue that you are personally
worried about the most, then the issue that worries you the second most
and so on, until you have ranked all five issues. If you change your
mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Ranking where 1 is “most worried” and 5 is
“least worried”. The order of the response options is randomized. Should
be viewed in conjuction with r16km_privacy_none which appeared as an
independent response option just below the rankings.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
208 |
18.4% |
0.18358341 |
| 2 |
2 |
255 |
22.5% |
0.22506620 |
| 3 |
3 |
205 |
18.1% |
0.18093557 |
| 4 |
4 |
177 |
15.6% |
0.15622242 |
| 5 |
5 |
100 |
8.8% |
0.08826125 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
188 |
16.6% |
0.16593116 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_privacy_none
|
Variable label:
|
How worried about: Not worried about any of the issues
|
|
Literal question:
|
Not worried about any of the issues
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Shown on the same page as r16km_privacy_1,
r16km_privacy_2, r16km_privacy_3, r16km_privacy_4 and r16km_privacy_5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not worried about any of the issues |
33 |
2.9% |
0.02912621 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1092 |
96.4% |
0.96381289 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
8 |
0.7% |
0.00706090 |
r16km_privacy_open
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Worried about other issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is there one issue that you are very worried about but isn’t on the
list? If this is the case, you can write it in the box below.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16pkby3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
52 |
4.6% |
0.0458958517 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
403 |
35.6% |
0.3556928508 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
512 |
45.2% |
0.4518976169 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
136 |
12.0% |
0.1200353045 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
29 |
2.6% |
0.0255957635 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008826125 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16dv39
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you now think/read/talk about something related to 22 July?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
It’s now been more than eight years since the attacks of 22 July 201.
|
|
Literal question:
|
When it comes to you personally, how often would you say that you now
think about, read or talk about something that is related to 22 July?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Daily |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001765225 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
36 |
3.2% |
0.031774051 |
| 3 |
A couple of times a month |
233 |
20.6% |
0.205648720 |
| 4 |
Less often, but it happens |
775 |
68.4% |
0.684024713 |
| 5 |
Never |
84 |
7.4% |
0.074139453 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002647838 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16k43_1
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections
this autumn?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections
this autumn?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
435 |
3.4% |
0.033710477 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2456 |
19.0% |
0.190328580 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
673 |
5.2% |
0.052154371 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
502 |
3.9% |
0.038902666 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1021 |
7.9% |
0.079122753 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1548 |
12.0% |
0.119962802 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
1116 |
8.6% |
0.086484811 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2662 |
20.6% |
0.206292622 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
616 |
4.8% |
0.047737136 |
| 10 |
The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) |
268 |
2.1% |
0.020768754 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
25 |
0.2% |
0.001937384 |
| 12 |
A local party list |
208 |
1.6% |
0.016119033 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
130 |
1.0% |
0.010074396 |
| 14 |
Did not vote |
825 |
6.4% |
0.063933664 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
67 |
0.5% |
0.005192188 |
| 16 |
Other: |
281 |
2.2% |
0.021776193 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
0.6% |
0.005502170 |
r16k43_1_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections
this autumn? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections
this autumn?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondentene spurt. Rekkefølgen på svaralternativene er
randomisert. ]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
435 |
3.4% |
0.033710477 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2457 |
19.0% |
0.190406076 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
675 |
5.2% |
0.052309361 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
502 |
3.9% |
0.038902666 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1021 |
7.9% |
0.079122753 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1548 |
12.0% |
0.119962802 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
1118 |
8.7% |
0.086639802 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2664 |
20.6% |
0.206447613 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
616 |
4.8% |
0.047737136 |
| 10 |
The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) |
272 |
2.1% |
0.021078735 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
26 |
0.2% |
0.002014879 |
| 12 |
A local party list |
229 |
1.8% |
0.017746435 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
130 |
1.0% |
0.010074396 |
| 14 |
Did not vote |
841 |
6.5% |
0.065173590 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
68 |
0.5% |
0.005269684 |
| 16 |
Other: |
231 |
1.8% |
0.017901426 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
0.6% |
0.005502170 |
r16k43_1_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R16K43_1_16] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hvilke parti/liste stemte du på ved kommunevalget nå i høst?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16k43_2
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council
election this autumn?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council
election this autumn?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. The order of the response options is randomized
(but adhers to the order of r16k43_1).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
453 |
3.5% |
0.0351053937 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2413 |
18.7% |
0.1869962802 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
683 |
5.3% |
0.0529293242 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
454 |
3.5% |
0.0351828890 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
965 |
7.5% |
0.0747830130 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1606 |
12.4% |
0.1244575325 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
1086 |
8.4% |
0.0841599504 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2456 |
19.0% |
0.1903285803 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
581 |
4.5% |
0.0450247985 |
| 10 |
The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) |
234 |
1.8% |
0.0181339120 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
9 |
0.1% |
0.0006974582 |
| 12 |
A local party list |
68 |
0.5% |
0.0052696838 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
195 |
1.5% |
0.0151115933 |
| 14 |
Did not vote |
1175 |
9.1% |
0.0910570366 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
121 |
0.9% |
0.0093769374 |
| 16 |
Other: |
277 |
2.1% |
0.0214662120 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
128 |
1.0% |
0.0099194048 |
r16k43_2_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council
election this autumn? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council
election this autumn?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondentene spurt. Rekkefølgen på svaralternativene er
randomisert (men tilsvarer rekkefølgen til r16k43_1).]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
453 |
3.5% |
0.0351053937 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2413 |
18.7% |
0.1869962802 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
683 |
5.3% |
0.0529293242 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
454 |
3.5% |
0.0351828890 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
965 |
7.5% |
0.0747830130 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1606 |
12.4% |
0.1244575325 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
1087 |
8.4% |
0.0842374458 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2457 |
19.0% |
0.1904060756 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
581 |
4.5% |
0.0450247985 |
| 10 |
The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) |
236 |
1.8% |
0.0182889027 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
9 |
0.1% |
0.0006974582 |
| 12 |
A local party list |
76 |
0.6% |
0.0058896466 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
195 |
1.5% |
0.0151115933 |
| 14 |
Did not vote |
1186 |
9.2% |
0.0919094854 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
121 |
0.9% |
0.0093769374 |
| 16 |
Other: |
254 |
2.0% |
0.0196838190 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
128 |
1.0% |
0.0099194048 |
r16k43_2_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R16K43_2_16] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hvilke parti/liste stemte du på ved fylkesvalget nå i høst?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16pk204
|
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
375 |
2.9% |
0.029060756 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2568 |
19.9% |
0.199008060 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
821 |
6.4% |
0.063623683 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
364 |
2.8% |
0.028208308 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1162 |
9.0% |
0.090049597 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
2069 |
16.0% |
0.160337880 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
934 |
7.2% |
0.072380657 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2540 |
19.7% |
0.196838190 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
743 |
5.8% |
0.057579045 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
235 |
1.8% |
0.018211407 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
299 |
2.3% |
0.023171110 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
282 |
2.2% |
0.021853689 |
| 13 |
Other: |
432 |
3.3% |
0.033477991 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
80 |
0.6% |
0.006199628 |
r16pk204_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondentene spurt. Rekkefølgen på svaralternativene er
randomisert. ]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
375 |
2.9% |
0.029060756 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2568 |
19.9% |
0.199008060 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
821 |
6.4% |
0.063623683 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
364 |
2.8% |
0.028208308 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1162 |
9.0% |
0.090049597 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
2069 |
16.0% |
0.160337880 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
934 |
7.2% |
0.072380657 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2540 |
19.7% |
0.196838190 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
743 |
5.8% |
0.057579045 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
235 |
1.8% |
0.018211407 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
299 |
2.3% |
0.023171110 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
283 |
2.2% |
0.021931184 |
| 13 |
Other: |
431 |
3.3% |
0.033400496 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
80 |
0.6% |
0.006199628 |
r16pk204_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R16K204_13] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16tdr23_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important when voting: I always vote for this party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections.
How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I always vote for this party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
316 |
9.2% |
0.09247878 |
| 2 |
Important |
705 |
20.6% |
0.20632133 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
655 |
19.2% |
0.19168862 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
440 |
12.9% |
0.12876793 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
1101 |
32.2% |
0.32221247 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
200 |
5.9% |
0.05853088 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important when voting: I wish to indicate general support to one
party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections.
How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I wish to indicate general support to one party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
607 |
17.8% |
0.17764121 |
| 2 |
Important |
1251 |
36.6% |
0.36611062 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
638 |
18.7% |
0.18671349 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
365 |
10.7% |
0.10681885 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
366 |
10.7% |
0.10711150 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
190 |
5.6% |
0.05560433 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23_3
|
Variable label:
|
How important when voting: I wish to exercise my civic duty
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections.
How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I wish to exercise my civic duty
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
1708 |
50.0% |
0.49985367 |
| 2 |
Important |
1035 |
30.3% |
0.30289728 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
242 |
7.1% |
0.07082236 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
137 |
4.0% |
0.04009365 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
128 |
3.7% |
0.03745976 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
167 |
4.9% |
0.04887328 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23_4
|
Variable label:
|
How important when voting: I wish to influence municipal policies
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections.
How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I wish to influence municipal policies
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
1551 |
45.4% |
0.45390694 |
| 2 |
Important |
1265 |
37.0% |
0.37020778 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
329 |
9.6% |
0.09628329 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
103 |
3.0% |
0.03014340 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
63 |
1.8% |
0.01843723 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
106 |
3.1% |
0.03102136 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23_5
|
Variable label:
|
How important when voting: I wish to influence county authority policies
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections.
How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I wish to influence county authority policies
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
1082 |
31.7% |
0.31665203 |
| 2 |
Important |
1178 |
34.5% |
0.34474685 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
615 |
18.0% |
0.17998244 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
233 |
6.8% |
0.06818847 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
149 |
4.4% |
0.04360550 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
160 |
4.7% |
0.04682470 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23_6
|
Variable label:
|
How important when voting: Andre grunner
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections.
How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other reasons:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
181 |
5.3% |
0.05297044 |
| 2 |
Important |
310 |
9.1% |
0.09072286 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
352 |
10.3% |
0.10301434 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
128 |
3.7% |
0.03745976 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
422 |
12.4% |
0.12350015 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2024 |
59.2% |
0.59233246 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R16TDR23_6] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections.
How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other reasons:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16tdr23b
|
Variable label:
|
How important: Your home municipality represented in the new
municipality
|
|
Literal question:
|
During this autumn’s election, how important was it for you to make sure
that your home municipality would be represented in the new
municipality’s governing bodies?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 and r16tdr20a = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
207 |
31.6% |
0.315548780 |
| 2 |
Important |
233 |
35.5% |
0.355182927 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
94 |
14.3% |
0.143292683 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
28 |
4.3% |
0.042682927 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
89 |
13.6% |
0.135670732 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.8% |
0.007621951 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12248 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23c
|
Variable label:
|
How important: Your home county authority represented in the new county
authority
|
|
Literal question:
|
During this autumn’s election, how important was it for you to make sure
that your home county authority would be represented in the new county
authority’s governing bodies?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 and r16tdr20c = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
314 |
28.9% |
0.28940092 |
| 2 |
Important |
348 |
32.1% |
0.32073733 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
174 |
16.0% |
0.16036866 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
77 |
7.1% |
0.07096774 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
152 |
14.0% |
0.14009217 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.8% |
0.01843318 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11819 |
|
NA |
r16tdr24_1
|
Variable label:
|
You vote in local elections to: To reward/punish local politicians
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons to vote for specific local or county council
representatives. Below you will find some of these reasons. How
important are these reasons for you when choosing a political party or
party list during local elections:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I use my vote to reward or punish local politicians regarding their
behaviour or decisions they made over the past 4 years.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
378 |
11.1% |
0.11062335 |
| 2 |
Important |
852 |
24.9% |
0.24934153 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
670 |
19.6% |
0.19607843 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
462 |
13.5% |
0.13520632 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
964 |
28.2% |
0.28211882 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
91 |
2.7% |
0.02663155 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr24_2
|
Variable label:
|
You vote in local elections to: To reward/punish county authority
politicians
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons to vote for specific local or county council
representatives. Below you will find some of these reasons. How
important are these reasons for you when choosing a political party or
party list during local elections:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I use my vote to reward or punish county authority politicians regarding
their behaviour or decisions they made over the past 4 years.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
251 |
7.3% |
0.07345625 |
| 2 |
Important |
657 |
19.2% |
0.19227392 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
681 |
19.9% |
0.19929763 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
525 |
15.4% |
0.15364355 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
1180 |
34.5% |
0.34533216 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
123 |
3.6% |
0.03599649 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr24_3
|
Variable label:
|
You vote in local elections to: To reward/punish national politicians
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons to vote for specific local or county council
representatives. Below you will find some of these reasons. How
important are these reasons for you when choosing a political party or
party list during local elections:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I use my vote to reward or punish national politicians regarding their
behaviour or decisions they made over the past 2 years.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
361 |
10.6% |
0.10564823 |
| 2 |
Important |
782 |
22.9% |
0.22885572 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
648 |
19.0% |
0.18964004 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
482 |
14.1% |
0.14105941 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
1005 |
29.4% |
0.29411765 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
139 |
4.1% |
0.04067896 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr24_4
|
Variable label:
|
You vote in local elections to: To enure the municipality’s interests
are safeguarded
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons to vote for specific local or county council
representatives. Below you will find some of these reasons. How
important are these reasons for you when choosing a political party or
party list during local elections:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I use my vote to ensure that the municipality’s elected officials act in
the best interests of my municipality over the next four years.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
1663 |
48.7% |
0.48668423 |
| 2 |
Important |
1285 |
37.6% |
0.37606087 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
244 |
7.1% |
0.07140767 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
65 |
1.9% |
0.01902253 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
103 |
3.0% |
0.03014340 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
1.7% |
0.01668130 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr24_5
|
Variable label:
|
You vote in local elections to: To enure the county’s interests are
safeguarded
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons to vote for specific local or county council
representatives. Below you will find some of these reasons. How
important are these reasons for you when choosing a political party or
party list during local elections:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I use my vote to ensure that the county authority’s elected officials
act in the best interests of my county over the next four years.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
1255 |
36.7% |
0.36728124 |
| 2 |
Important |
1274 |
37.3% |
0.37284167 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
450 |
13.2% |
0.13169447 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
164 |
4.8% |
0.04799532 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
176 |
5.2% |
0.05150717 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
98 |
2.9% |
0.02868013 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr24_6
|
Variable label:
|
You vote in local elections to: Government policies must have support
among locally elected officials
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons to vote for specific local or county council
representatives. Below you will find some of these reasons. How
important are these reasons for you when choosing a political party or
party list during local elections:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I use my vote to ensure that government policies have support among
elected officials in my county authority/municipality over the next two
years.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
823 |
24.1% |
0.24085455 |
| 2 |
Important |
1055 |
30.9% |
0.30875037 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
507 |
14.8% |
0.14837577 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
259 |
7.6% |
0.07579748 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
656 |
19.2% |
0.19198127 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
117 |
3.4% |
0.03424056 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: Road tolls
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the local elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
232 |
13.2% |
0.13151927 |
| 2 |
Important |
289 |
16.4% |
0.16383220 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
307 |
17.4% |
0.17403628 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
277 |
15.7% |
0.15702948 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
605 |
34.3% |
0.34297052 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
3.1% |
0.03061224 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: The merger of
municipalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the local elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The merger of municipalities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
186 |
10.5% |
0.10544218 |
| 2 |
Important |
355 |
20.1% |
0.20124717 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
350 |
19.8% |
0.19841270 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
275 |
15.6% |
0.15589569 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
538 |
30.5% |
0.30498866 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
3.4% |
0.03401361 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_3
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: Environment/climate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the local elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Environment/climate
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
506 |
28.7% |
0.28684807 |
| 2 |
Important |
601 |
34.1% |
0.34070295 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
349 |
19.8% |
0.19784580 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
164 |
9.3% |
0.09297052 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
96 |
5.4% |
0.05442177 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
2.7% |
0.02721088 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_4
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: School
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the local elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
School
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
627 |
35.5% |
0.35544218 |
| 2 |
Important |
708 |
40.1% |
0.40136054 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
214 |
12.1% |
0.12131519 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
98 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
73 |
4.1% |
0.04138322 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.5% |
0.02494331 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_5
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: Care for the elderly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the local elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Care for the elderly
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
641 |
36.3% |
0.36337868 |
| 2 |
Important |
695 |
39.4% |
0.39399093 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
231 |
13.1% |
0.13095238 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
100 |
5.7% |
0.05668934 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
60 |
3.4% |
0.03401361 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.1% |
0.02097506 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_6
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: Public transport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the local elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Public transport
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
459 |
26.0% |
0.26020408 |
| 2 |
Important |
678 |
38.4% |
0.38435374 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
317 |
18.0% |
0.17970522 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
138 |
7.8% |
0.07823129 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
116 |
6.6% |
0.06575964 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
3.2% |
0.03174603 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_7
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: Culture/sports
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the local elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Culture/sports
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
241 |
13.7% |
0.13662132 |
| 2 |
Important |
653 |
37.0% |
0.37018141 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
471 |
26.7% |
0.26700680 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
231 |
13.1% |
0.13095238 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
108 |
6.1% |
0.06122449 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
3.4% |
0.03401361 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_8
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: Property tax
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the local elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Property tax
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
290 |
16.4% |
0.16439909 |
| 2 |
Important |
403 |
22.8% |
0.22845805 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
389 |
22.1% |
0.22052154 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
261 |
14.8% |
0.14795918 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
367 |
20.8% |
0.20804989 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
3.1% |
0.03061224 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: Road tolls
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the county council election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
219 |
12.4% |
0.12414966 |
| 2 |
Important |
274 |
15.5% |
0.15532880 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
319 |
18.1% |
0.18083900 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
258 |
14.6% |
0.14625850 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
613 |
34.8% |
0.34750567 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
4.6% |
0.04591837 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_2
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: The merger of
county authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the county council election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The merger of county authorities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
210 |
11.9% |
0.11904762 |
| 2 |
Important |
336 |
19.0% |
0.19047619 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
351 |
19.9% |
0.19897959 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
247 |
14.0% |
0.14002268 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
530 |
30.0% |
0.30045351 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
5.1% |
0.05102041 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_3
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election:
Environment/climate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the county council election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Environment/climate
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
461 |
26.1% |
0.26133787 |
| 2 |
Important |
577 |
32.7% |
0.32709751 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
338 |
19.2% |
0.19160998 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
152 |
8.6% |
0.08616780 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
146 |
8.3% |
0.08276644 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
5.1% |
0.05102041 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_4
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: School/education
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the county council election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
School/education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
577 |
32.7% |
0.32709751 |
| 2 |
Important |
679 |
38.5% |
0.38492063 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
224 |
12.7% |
0.12698413 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
96 |
5.4% |
0.05442177 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
108 |
6.1% |
0.06122449 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
80 |
4.5% |
0.04535147 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_5
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: Culture/sports
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the county council election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Culture/sports
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
174 |
9.9% |
0.09863946 |
| 2 |
Important |
649 |
36.8% |
0.36791383 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
448 |
25.4% |
0.25396825 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
224 |
12.7% |
0.12698413 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
180 |
10.2% |
0.10204082 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
89 |
5.0% |
0.05045351 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_6
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: Industrial and
regional policy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the county council election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Industrial and regional policy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
401 |
22.7% |
0.22732426 |
| 2 |
Important |
694 |
39.3% |
0.39342404 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
339 |
19.2% |
0.19217687 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
109 |
6.2% |
0.06179138 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
139 |
7.9% |
0.07879819 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
82 |
4.6% |
0.04648526 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_7
|
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: Jobs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your
vote in the county council election?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Jobs
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
556 |
31.5% |
0.31519274 |
| 2 |
Important |
670 |
38.0% |
0.37981859 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
250 |
14.2% |
0.14172336 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
98 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
116 |
6.6% |
0.06575964 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
4.2% |
0.04195011 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr22
|
Variable label:
|
Which level of governance would you say safeguards your interests best?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a general basis, which level of governance would you say safeguards
your interests best?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
National level |
585 |
33.2% |
0.331632653 |
| 2 |
County Authority |
46 |
2.6% |
0.026077098 |
| 3 |
Municipality |
525 |
29.8% |
0.297619048 |
| 4 |
All three equally well |
421 |
23.9% |
0.238662132 |
| 5 |
None of them safeguard my interests |
171 |
9.7% |
0.096938776 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009070295 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr16
|
Variable label:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway? Do you
believe it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
714 |
40.5% |
0.4047619048 |
| 2 |
Good |
815 |
46.2% |
0.4620181406 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
156 |
8.8% |
0.0884353741 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
37 |
2.1% |
0.0209750567 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
28 |
1.6% |
0.0158730159 |
| 6 |
Bad |
8 |
0.5% |
0.0045351474 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
5 |
0.3% |
0.0028344671 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005668934 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr17
|
Variable label:
|
The economic situation [in your region of the country], compared to the
rest of Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation [in your region of the country]
with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation in your region of
the country as better, worse or the same?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Better |
626 |
35.5% |
0.354875283 |
| 2 |
Worse |
244 |
13.8% |
0.138321995 |
| 3 |
The same |
877 |
49.7% |
0.497165533 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.0% |
0.009637188 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr17_b
|
Variable label:
|
What is the economic situation [in your region of the country] compared
to the rest of Norway a result of?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say this is primarily the result of:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 and r16tdr17 is answered. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Government policy |
431 |
24.7% |
0.24670864 |
| 2 |
County authority policy |
64 |
3.7% |
0.03663423 |
| 3 |
Municipal policy |
146 |
8.4% |
0.08357184 |
| 4 |
Norwegian politics in general |
836 |
47.9% |
0.47853463 |
| 5 |
The development is not the result of policies at any level |
251 |
14.4% |
0.14367487 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01087579 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11157 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Most of the elected local officials are proficient
people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you
completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally
disagree.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Here, most elected local officials are proficient people who know what
they are doing
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
176 |
10.0% |
0.099773243 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
1105 |
62.6% |
0.626417234 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
392 |
22.2% |
0.222222222 |
| 4 |
Completely disagree |
80 |
4.5% |
0.045351474 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006235828 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The local council representatives soon lose contact with
ordinary people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you
completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally
disagree.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The local council representatives we choose soon lose contact with
ordinary people
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
164 |
9.3% |
0.09297052 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
629 |
35.7% |
0.35657596 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
795 |
45.1% |
0.45068027 |
| 4 |
Completely disagree |
155 |
8.8% |
0.08786848 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01190476 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Elected local officials put their personal interests
aside
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you
completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally
disagree.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Here, elected local officials put their personal interests aside when
they make political decisions
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
87 |
4.9% |
0.04931973 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
799 |
45.3% |
0.45294785 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
686 |
38.9% |
0.38888889 |
| 4 |
Completely disagree |
149 |
8.4% |
0.08446712 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
2.4% |
0.02437642 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Local politicians safeguard the municipality’s interests
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you
completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally
disagree.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Here, local politicians safeguard the interests of the entire
municipality
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
144 |
8.2% |
0.08163265 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
1031 |
58.4% |
0.58446712 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
458 |
26.0% |
0.25963719 |
| 4 |
Completely disagree |
104 |
5.9% |
0.05895692 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.5% |
0.01530612 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The local council rarely consider ordinary people’s
opinions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you
completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally
disagree.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Members of the local council who make decisions rarely take into account
the thoughts and opinions of ordinary people
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
165 |
9.4% |
0.09353741 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
551 |
31.2% |
0.31235828 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
852 |
48.3% |
0.48299320 |
| 4 |
Completely disagree |
168 |
9.5% |
0.09523810 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01587302 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I can entrust local politicians with the responsibility
of the municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you
completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally
disagree.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that I can safely entrust local politicians with the
responsibility of governing the municipality
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
207 |
11.7% |
0.11734694 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
960 |
54.4% |
0.54421769 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
427 |
24.2% |
0.24206349 |
| 4 |
Completely disagree |
142 |
8.0% |
0.08049887 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01587302 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_7
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Politicians must be closely watched in this municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you
completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally
disagree.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians must be closely watched in this municipality, otherwise they
will abuse their power
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
209 |
11.8% |
0.11848073 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
559 |
31.7% |
0.31689342 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
758 |
43.0% |
0.42970522 |
| 4 |
Completely disagree |
196 |
11.1% |
0.11111111 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2.4% |
0.02380952 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_8
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Politicians keep their promises in this municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you
completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally
disagree.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians keep their promises in this municipality
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
29 |
1.6% |
0.01643991 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
966 |
54.8% |
0.54761905 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
591 |
33.5% |
0.33503401 |
| 4 |
Completely disagree |
135 |
7.7% |
0.07653061 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
2.4% |
0.02437642 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_9
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It doesn’t matter who one votes for
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you
completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally
disagree.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It doesn’t matter who one votes for, it won’t have any effect on what is
happening in the municipality
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
91 |
5.2% |
0.05158730 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
449 |
25.5% |
0.25453515 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
691 |
39.2% |
0.39172336 |
| 4 |
Completely disagree |
506 |
28.7% |
0.28684807 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.5% |
0.01530612 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr14
|
Variable label:
|
How much confidence would you say you have in local politicians?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence would you say you have in local politicians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
21 |
1.3% |
0.01270417 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
549 |
33.2% |
0.33212341 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
824 |
49.8% |
0.49848760 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
220 |
13.3% |
0.13309135 |
| 5 |
No confidence at all |
39 |
2.4% |
0.02359347 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16valg2017
|
Variable label:
|
Did you vote in the general election in 2017?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Did you vote in the general election in 2017?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and did not answer r10k3 or r11bk3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
419 |
89.9% |
0.899141631 |
| 2 |
No |
19 |
4.1% |
0.040772532 |
| 3 |
I did not have the right to vote |
20 |
4.3% |
0.042918455 |
| 4 |
Cannot remember |
3 |
0.6% |
0.006437768 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
1.1% |
0.010729614 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12438 |
|
NA |
r16valg2015
|
Variable label:
|
Did you vote in the local elections in 2015?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Did you vote in the local elections in 2015?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and did not answer r5k2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
919 |
88.8% |
0.887922705 |
| 2 |
No |
49 |
4.7% |
0.047342995 |
| 3 |
I did not have the right to vote |
21 |
2.0% |
0.020289855 |
| 4 |
Cannot remember |
36 |
3.5% |
0.034782609 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
1.0% |
0.009661836 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11869 |
|
NA |
r16km_eu
|
Variable label:
|
How much do you oppose or support Norwegian membership in the EU?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Now thinking about the European Union, how much do you oppose or support
Norwegian membership in the EU?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please select your answer on the scale below.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - I completely oppose Norwegian EU membership |
478 |
27.7% |
0.276620370 |
| 1 |
1 |
122 |
7.1% |
0.070601852 |
| 2 |
2 |
141 |
8.2% |
0.081597222 |
| 3 |
3 |
140 |
8.1% |
0.081018519 |
| 4 |
4 |
90 |
5.2% |
0.052083333 |
| 5 |
5 |
196 |
11.3% |
0.113425926 |
| 6 |
6 |
91 |
5.3% |
0.052662037 |
| 7 |
7 |
107 |
6.2% |
0.061921296 |
| 8 |
8 |
116 |
6.7% |
0.067129630 |
| 9 |
9 |
58 |
3.4% |
0.033564815 |
| 10 |
10 - I completely support Norwegian EU membership |
185 |
10.7% |
0.107060185 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002314815 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16km_hc_1
|
Variable label:
|
During the last year you have: Been hunting
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the
activities below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hunting
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hunting |
147 |
8.5% |
0.08506944 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1581 |
91.5% |
0.91493056 |
r16km_hc_2
|
Variable label:
|
During the last year you have: Been fishing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the
activities below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fishing
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Fishing |
575 |
33.3% |
0.3327546 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1153 |
66.7% |
0.6672454 |
r16km_hc_3
|
Variable label:
|
During the last year you have: Been hiking in the forest
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the
activities below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hiking in the forest
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hiking in the forest |
1557 |
90.1% |
0.90104167 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
171 |
9.9% |
0.09895833 |
r16km_hc_4
|
Variable label:
|
During the last year you have: Been hiking in the mountains
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the
activities below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hiking in the mountains
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hiking in the mountains |
1147 |
66.4% |
0.6637731 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
581 |
33.6% |
0.3362269 |
r16km_hc_5
|
Variable label:
|
During the last year you have: Been on boat trip (leisure boat)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the
activities below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Boat trip (leisure boat)
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Boat trip (leisure boat) |
823 |
47.6% |
0.4762731 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
905 |
52.4% |
0.5237269 |
r16km_oilwork_1
|
Variable label:
|
Connection to the oil and gas industry: I work in the oil or gas
industry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to find out about your connection to the oil and gas
industry. Do you, or someone in your close family, work in the oil or
gas industry?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I work in the oil or gas industry
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I work in the oil or gas industry |
38 |
2.2% |
0.02199074 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1690 |
97.8% |
0.97800926 |
r16km_oilwork_2
|
Variable label:
|
Connection to the oil and gas industry: My job is connected to the
industry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to find out about your connection to the oil and gas
industry. Do you, or someone in your close family, work in the oil or
gas industry?
|
|
Literal question:
|
My job is closely connected to the oil or gas industry
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
My job is closely connected to the oil or gas industry |
42 |
2.4% |
0.02430556 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1686 |
97.6% |
0.97569444 |
r16km_oilwork_3
|
Variable label:
|
Connection to the oil and gas industry: I have previously worked in the
industry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to find out about your connection to the oil and gas
industry. Do you, or someone in your close family, work in the oil or
gas industry?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have previously worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely
connected to it
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I have previously worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely connected
to it |
113 |
6.5% |
0.06539352 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1615 |
93.5% |
0.93460648 |
r16km_oilwork_4
|
Variable label:
|
Connection to the oil and gas industry: Someone in my household works in
the industry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to find out about your connection to the oil and gas
industry. Do you, or someone in your close family, work in the oil or
gas industry?
|
|
Literal question:
|
One or more of the others in my household work in the oil/gas industry,
or are closely connected to it
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
One or more of the others in my household work in the oil/gas industry, or are
closely connected to it |
65 |
3.8% |
0.03761574 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1663 |
96.2% |
0.96238426 |
r16km_oilwork_5
|
Variable label:
|
Connection to the oil and gas industry: A close relative works in the
industry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to find out about your connection to the oil and gas
industry. Do you, or someone in your close family, work in the oil or
gas industry?
|
|
Literal question:
|
A close relative works in the oil/gas industry, or is closely connected
to it
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A close relative works in the oil/gas industry, or is closely connected to it |
288 |
16.7% |
0.1666667 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1440 |
83.3% |
0.8333333 |
r16km_oilwork_6
|
Variable label:
|
Connection to the oil and gas industry: I/my family do not work in the
industry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to find out about your connection to the oil and gas
industry. Do you, or someone in your close family, work in the oil or
gas industry?
|
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
1251 |
72.4% |
0.7239583 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
477 |
27.6% |
0.2760417 |
r16padproleg3
|
Variable label:
|
What is your attitude toward gender quotas in working life?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your attitude toward gender quotas in working life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am for gender quotas in working life |
857 |
49.6% |
0.49594907 |
| 2 |
I am against gender quotas in working life |
836 |
48.4% |
0.48379630 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
2.0% |
0.02025463 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg4
|
Variable label:
|
How important is this matter to you personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is this matter to you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 and r16padproleg3 is answered. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
111 |
6.6% |
0.065564087 |
| 2 |
Important |
404 |
23.9% |
0.238629652 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
632 |
37.3% |
0.373301831 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
458 |
27.1% |
0.270525694 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
86 |
5.1% |
0.050797401 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001181335 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11211 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg5a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Supreme Court generally makes unbiased decisions
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement: As a general
rule, we can rely on the Supreme Court to make unbiased decisions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. The order of r16padproleg5a, r16padproleg5b and
r16padproleg5c is randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
305 |
17.7% |
0.176504630 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
874 |
50.6% |
0.505787037 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
469 |
27.1% |
0.271412037 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
47 |
2.7% |
0.027199074 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
22 |
1.3% |
0.012731481 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006365741 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg5b
|
Variable label:
|
Should Supreme Court judges with unpopular decisions possibly be removed
from their position?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement: It should be
possible to remove Supreme Court judges from their position, who
consistently make decisions that most people disagree with.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. The order of r16padproleg5a, r16padproleg5b and
r16padproleg5c is randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
105 |
6.1% |
0.06076389 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
235 |
13.6% |
0.13599537 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
591 |
34.2% |
0.34201389 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
424 |
24.5% |
0.24537037 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
347 |
20.1% |
0.20081019 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.5% |
0.01504630 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg5c
|
Variable label:
|
Should Supreme Court appointments also be approved by the Norwegian
Parliament?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Currently, Supreme Court judges are appointed by the Government on
recommendation by an independent judicial appointments board . This is
to ensure judicial neutrality. However, it has been suggested that
Supreme Court appointments must also be approved by the Norwegian
Parliament. This is due to the fact that Supreme Court decisions often
have political consequences, and it is therefore important to have some
degree of political control over the appointment process.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you say that you agree with this suggestion?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. The order of r16padproleg5a, r16padproleg5b and
r16padproleg5c is randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
97 |
5.6% |
0.056134259 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
276 |
16.0% |
0.159722222 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
522 |
30.2% |
0.302083333 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
400 |
23.1% |
0.231481481 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
418 |
24.2% |
0.241898148 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.9% |
0.008680556 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg6_majoritet
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
majority for r16padproleg6.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
majority for r16padproleg6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[blank] |
426 |
24.7% |
0.2465278 |
| 2 |
unanimously |
409 |
23.7% |
0.2366898 |
| 3 |
by a large majority of 17 to 2 judges |
451 |
26.1% |
0.2609954 |
| 4 |
by a small majority of 10 to 9 judges |
442 |
25.6% |
0.2557870 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg6_utfall
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
outcome for r16padproleg6.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
outcome for r16padproleg6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the Norwegian government’s decision is not in breach of the Constitution, and
that oil exploration in the Barents Sea can be continued. |
854 |
49.4% |
0.494213 |
| 2 |
the Norwegian government’s decision is in breach of the Constitution, and that
oil exploration in the Barents Sea must cease. |
874 |
50.6% |
0.505787 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_kjonn1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomiserer dersom r16group = 3. Bakgrunnsvariabel. Velger tilfeldig
kjønn til r16padproleg6.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
gender for r16padproleg6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
female |
887 |
51.3% |
0.5133102 |
| 2 |
male |
841 |
48.7% |
0.4866898 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_kjonn2
|
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite
gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite
gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
woman |
841 |
48.7% |
0.4866898 |
| 2 |
man |
887 |
51.3% |
0.5133102 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_kjonn3
|
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite
gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite
gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
female |
841 |
48.7% |
0.4866898 |
| 2 |
male |
887 |
51.3% |
0.5133102 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_kjonn4
|
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite
gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite
gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
male |
841 |
48.7% |
0.4866898 |
| 2 |
female |
887 |
51.3% |
0.5133102 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_kjonn5
|
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite
gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite
gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
male |
841 |
48.7% |
0.4866898 |
| 2 |
female |
887 |
51.3% |
0.5133102 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_rep
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects panel
of judges for r16padproleg6.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects panel
of judges for r16padproleg6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
consisting of five male judges |
439 |
25.4% |
0.2540509 |
| 2 |
consisting of five female judges |
406 |
23.5% |
0.2349537 |
| 3 |
consisting of three male and two female judges |
444 |
25.7% |
0.2569444 |
| 4 |
consisting of three female and two male judges |
439 |
25.4% |
0.2540509 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_utfall
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomiserer dersom r16group = 3. Bakgrunnsvariabel. Betinget
randomisering. Dersom r16padproleg7_kjonn1 = 1 velges tilfeldig verdi 3
eller 4. Dersom r16padproleg7_kjonn1 = 2 velges tilfeldig verdi 1 eller
2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Conditional
randomization. If r16padproleg7_kjonn1 = 1, value 3 or 4 is randomly
selected. If r16padproleg7_kjonn1 = 2, value 1 or 2 is randomly
selected.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
gender did play a role during the appointment process and therefore the female
applicant was subjected to unlawful gender discrimination |
397 |
23.0% |
0.2297454 |
| 2 |
gender did not play a role during the appointment process and therefore the
female applicant was not subjected to unlawful gender discrimination |
444 |
25.7% |
0.2569444 |
| 3 |
gender did play a role during the appointment process and therefore the male
applicant was subjected to unlawful gender discrimination |
434 |
25.1% |
0.2511574 |
| 4 |
gender did not play a role during the appointment process and therefore the male
applicant was not subjected to unlawful gender discrimination |
453 |
26.2% |
0.2621528 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree with Supreme Court decision regarding gender
discrimination in employment
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the Supreme Court presides over a case that aims to
establish whether gender played a role when a [r16padproleg7_kjonn1]
applicant was employed rather than a [r16padproleg7_kjonn2], and whether
this was in breach of the Gender Equality Act.
In the case, a [r16padproleg7_kjonn3] applicant believes that they
were disregarded during the appointment process and that the employer
gave a [r16padproleg7_kjonn4] applicant unlawful preferential treatment
on the basis of their gender. However, the other party, the employer,
believes that the [r16padproleg7_kjonn5] candidate who was employed was
the best applicant for the position and therefore no unlawful gender
discrimination has taken place.
In the final ruling, the Supreme Court panel [r16padproleg7_rep]
unanimously decided that [r16padproleg7_utfall].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think this is an acceptable ruling made by the
Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on partially randomized values. See background variables. The order of
r16padproleg7a + r16padproleg7b and r16padproleg6 is randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
358 |
20.7% |
0.20717593 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
624 |
36.1% |
0.36111111 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
375 |
21.7% |
0.21701389 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
235 |
13.6% |
0.13599537 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
107 |
6.2% |
0.06192130 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.7% |
0.01678241 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7b
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think this is a fair ruling made by the Supreme
Court?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think this is a fair ruling made by the Supreme
Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on partially randomized values. See background variables. The order of
r16padproleg7a + r16padproleg7b and r16padproleg6 is randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
312 |
18.1% |
0.18055556 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
603 |
34.9% |
0.34895833 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
414 |
24.0% |
0.23958333 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
256 |
14.8% |
0.14814815 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
102 |
5.9% |
0.05902778 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
2.4% |
0.02372685 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree with Supreme Court decision regarding oil exploration in
the Barents Sea
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine how you would react to the following hypothetical situation if
it really occurred: In 2016, Greenpeace and Nature and Youth served the
Norwegian government with a court summons in order to stop decisions
regarding further oil exploration in the Barents Sea. The case was heard
in Oslo City Court in 2017 and will be heard in the Court of Appeal
during the autumn of 2019. Imagine that the case finally ends up in the
Supreme Court. On the basis of the principal nature of the matter, it is
decided that the case shall be heard in a plenary session consisting of
nineteen judges. In the final ruling, the Supreme Court decided
[r16padproleg6_majoritet] that [r16padproleg6_utfall].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think this is an acceptable ruling made by the
Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends
on randomized values. See background variables. The order of
r16padproleg7a + r16padproleg7b and r16padproleg6 is randomized.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
344 |
19.9% |
0.19907407 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
562 |
32.5% |
0.32523148 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
401 |
23.2% |
0.23206019 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
248 |
14.4% |
0.14351852 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
130 |
7.5% |
0.07523148 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
2.5% |
0.02488426 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_system
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
welfare scheme for r16trygd.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
welfare scheme for r16trygd.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
unemployment benefit |
817 |
24.2% |
0.2416445 |
| 2 |
sickness benefit |
868 |
25.7% |
0.2567288 |
| 3 |
disability benefit |
818 |
24.2% |
0.2419403 |
| 4 |
work assessment allowance |
878 |
26.0% |
0.2596865 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_beskrivelse
|
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Selects description
for r16trygd based on r16trygd_system.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Selects description
for r16trygd based on r16trygd_system.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Unemployment benefit provides unemployed people with financial support while
they are looking for jobs |
817 |
24.2% |
0.2416445 |
| 2 |
Sickness benefit replaces employment income when people are unable to work
because of illness or injury |
868 |
25.7% |
0.2567288 |
| 3 |
Disability benefit is provided if you have permanent loss of income due to
illness or injury |
818 |
24.2% |
0.2419403 |
| 4 |
Work assessment allowance ensures people income during periods when they require
help from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration due to illness or
injury. |
878 |
26.0% |
0.2596865 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_nasjonalitet
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
nationality for r16trygd.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
nationality for r16trygd.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian |
1170 |
34.6% |
0.3460515 |
| 2 |
Polish work immigrant |
1081 |
32.0% |
0.3197279 |
| 3 |
Syrian immigrant |
1130 |
33.4% |
0.3342206 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_inntekt
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
income for r16trygd.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
income for r16trygd.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NOK 250 000 |
1154 |
34.1% |
0.3413191 |
| 2 |
NOK 550 000 |
1101 |
32.6% |
0.3256433 |
| 3 |
NOK 850 000 |
1126 |
33.3% |
0.3330376 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_risiko
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
risk for r16trygd.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
risk for r16trygd.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
95 percent |
678 |
20.1% |
0.2005324 |
| 2 |
75 percent |
717 |
21.2% |
0.2120674 |
| 3 |
50 percent |
659 |
19.5% |
0.1949127 |
| 4 |
25 percent |
652 |
19.3% |
0.1928424 |
| 5 |
5 percent |
675 |
20.0% |
0.1996451 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_kjonn
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
gender for r16trygd.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
gender for r16trygd.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
he |
1715 |
50.7% |
0.5072464 |
| 2 |
she |
1666 |
49.3% |
0.4927536 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_alder
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
age for r16trygd.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects
age for r16trygd.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
25 year old |
1183 |
35.0% |
0.3498965 |
| 2 |
40 year old |
1091 |
32.3% |
0.3226856 |
| 3 |
55 year old |
1107 |
32.7% |
0.3274179 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd
|
Variable label:
|
If you had to decide, would you grant [r16trygd_system] to this person?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[r16trygd_beskrivelse]. Sometimes, however, some people receive
[r16trygd_system] that they are not entitled to. This may be due to lack
of information or misinformation.
Imagine an [r16trygd_alder] [r16trygd_nasjonalitet] who has worked in
Norway with annual earnings before tax of [r16trygd_inntekt]. Now,
[r16trygd_kjonn] applies for [r16trygd_system]. The Norwegian Labour and
Welfare Administration has collected all the available information, but
is still uncertain if [r16trygd_kjonn] is entitled to [r16trygd_system].
If [r16trygd_kjonn] is granted [r16trygd_system], there is a chance that
[r16trygd_kjonn] will receive [r16trygd_system] that [r16trygd_kjonn]
isn’t entitled to. Imagine that there is a [r16trygd_risiko] chance of
this.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to decide, would you grant [r16trygd_system] to this person?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 3. Experiment. The wording of the question
depends on randomized values. See background variables.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1224 |
36.2% |
0.362023070 |
| 2 |
No |
1013 |
30.0% |
0.299615498 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
1131 |
33.5% |
0.334516415 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.4% |
0.003845016 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9523 |
|
NA |
r16kreft1
|
Variable label:
|
Is it okay for you to answer questions related to cancer?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is it okay for you to answer questions related to cancer? The questions
are general and deal with your perception of cancer, not any personal
experiences.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 and kjonn = 2 or r16group = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
2464 |
95.9% |
0.959128065 |
| 2 |
No, I do not wish to answer questions related to cancer |
90 |
3.5% |
0.035033087 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.6% |
0.005838848 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10335 |
|
NA |
r16kreft2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Newspapers and
magazines
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Newspapers and magazines
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response
options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response
options.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Newspapers and magazines |
552 |
34.1% |
0.3407407 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1068 |
65.9% |
0.6592593 |
r16kreft2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Books and movies
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Books and movies
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response
options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response
options.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Books and movies |
33 |
2.0% |
0.02037037 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1587 |
98.0% |
0.97962963 |
r16kreft2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Friends/family who
have had cancer
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends, family or acquaintances who have had cancer
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response
options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response
options.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Friends, family or acquaintances who have had cancer |
333 |
20.6% |
0.2055556 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1287 |
79.4% |
0.7944444 |
r16kreft2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Health professionals
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health professionals
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response
options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response
options.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health professionals |
329 |
20.3% |
0.2030864 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1291 |
79.7% |
0.7969136 |
r16kreft2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Information
brochures
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Information brochures
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response
options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response
options.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Information brochures |
262 |
16.2% |
0.1617284 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1358 |
83.8% |
0.8382716 |
r16kreft2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Work and education
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Work and education
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response
options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response
options.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Work and education |
209 |
12.9% |
0.1290123 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1411 |
87.1% |
0.8709877 |
r16kreft2_7
|
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: TV and radio
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV and radio
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response
options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response
options.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
TV and radio |
480 |
29.6% |
0.2962963 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1140 |
70.4% |
0.7037037 |
r16kreft2_8
|
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Social media and
blogs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social media and blogs
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response
options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response
options.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social media and blogs |
145 |
9.0% |
0.08950617 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1475 |
91.0% |
0.91049383 |
r16kreft2_9
|
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Searching the
internet
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Searching the internet
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response
options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response
options.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Searching the internet |
235 |
14.5% |
0.1450617 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1385 |
85.5% |
0.8549383 |
r16kreft2_10
|
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer:
Friends/family/acquaintances
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends, family or acquaintances
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response
options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response
options.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Friends, family or acquaintances |
355 |
21.9% |
0.2191358 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1265 |
78.1% |
0.7808642 |
r16kreft2_11
|
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other (fill out)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response
options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response
options.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other |
25 |
1.5% |
0.0154321 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1595 |
98.5% |
0.9845679 |
r16kreft2_12
|
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Have not heard/read
about this
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have not heard or read about gynaecological cancers/I have no
knowledge about gynaecological cancers
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response
options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response
options.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I have not heard or read about gynaecological cancers/I have no knowledge about
gynaecological cancers |
220 |
13.6% |
0.1358025 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1400 |
86.4% |
0.8641975 |
r16kreft2_11_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R16KREFT2_11] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a
woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian,
cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or
heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about
gynaecological cancers from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other (fill out)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16kreft3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Most prevalent gynaecological cancer, do you think: Ovarian cancer
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which types of gynaecological cancers are most prevalent, do you think?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Ovarian cancer
|
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the type of cancer you think is
most prevalent, then the one you think is second most prevalent, and so
on, until you have ranked all five types. If you change your mind, you
can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1 and r16kreft2_12 != 1. Ranking
where 1 is “most prevalent” and 5 is “least prevalent”. The order of the
response options is randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
87 |
6.2% |
0.062142857 |
| 2 |
2 |
522 |
37.3% |
0.372857143 |
| 3 |
3 |
403 |
28.8% |
0.287857143 |
| 4 |
4 |
34 |
2.4% |
0.024285714 |
| 5 |
5 |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005714286 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
346 |
24.7% |
0.247142857 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11504 |
|
NA |
r16kreft3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Most prevalent gynaecological cancer, do you think: Cervical cancer
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which types of gynaecological cancers are most prevalent, do you think?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cervical cancer
|
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the type of cancer you think is
most prevalent, then the one you think is second most prevalent, and so
on, until you have ranked all five types. If you change your mind, you
can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1 and r16kreft2_12 != 1. Ranking
where 1 is “most prevalent” and 5 is “least prevalent”. The order of the
response options is randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
1119 |
79.9% |
0.7992857143 |
| 2 |
2 |
131 |
9.4% |
0.0935714286 |
| 3 |
3 |
48 |
3.4% |
0.0342857143 |
| 4 |
4 |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007142857 |
| 5 |
5 |
4 |
0.3% |
0.0028571429 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
97 |
6.9% |
0.0692857143 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11504 |
|
NA |
r16kreft3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Most prevalent gynaecological cancer, do you think: Womb (uterine)
cancer
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which types of gynaecological cancers are most prevalent, do you think?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Womb (uterine) cancer
|
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the type of cancer you think is
most prevalent, then the one you think is second most prevalent, and so
on, until you have ranked all five types. If you change your mind, you
can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1 and r16kreft2_12 != 1. Ranking
where 1 is “most prevalent” and 5 is “least prevalent”. The order of the
response options is randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
163 |
11.6% |
0.116428571 |
| 2 |
2 |
385 |
27.5% |
0.275000000 |
| 3 |
3 |
472 |
33.7% |
0.337142857 |
| 4 |
4 |
45 |
3.2% |
0.032142857 |
| 5 |
5 |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009285714 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
322 |
23.0% |
0.230000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11504 |
|
NA |
r16kreft3_4
|
Variable label:
|
Most prevalent gynaecological cancer, do you think: Vulval cancer
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which types of gynaecological cancers are most prevalent, do you think?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vulval cancer
|
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the type of cancer you think is
most prevalent, then the one you think is second most prevalent, and so
on, until you have ranked all five types. If you change your mind, you
can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1 and r16kreft2_12 != 1. Ranking
where 1 is “most prevalent” and 5 is “least prevalent”. The order of the
response options is randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002857143 |
| 2 |
2 |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003571429 |
| 3 |
3 |
18 |
1.3% |
0.012857143 |
| 4 |
4 |
125 |
8.9% |
0.089285714 |
| 5 |
5 |
773 |
55.2% |
0.552142857 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
475 |
33.9% |
0.339285714 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11504 |
|
NA |
r16kreft3_5
|
Variable label:
|
Most prevalent gynaecological cancer, do you think: Vaginal cancer
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which types of gynaecological cancers are most prevalent, do you think?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vaginal cancer
|
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the type of cancer you think is
most prevalent, then the one you think is second most prevalent, and so
on, until you have ranked all five types. If you change your mind, you
can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1 and r16kreft2_12 != 1. Ranking
where 1 is “most prevalent” and 5 is “least prevalent”. The order of the
response options is randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002857143 |
| 2 |
2 |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007857143 |
| 3 |
3 |
74 |
5.3% |
0.052857143 |
| 4 |
4 |
721 |
51.5% |
0.515000000 |
| 5 |
5 |
123 |
8.8% |
0.087857143 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
467 |
33.4% |
0.333571429 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11504 |
|
NA |
r16kreft4
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would you react negatively to have your uterus and
ovaries removed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some types of cancer are treated by removing the uterus and ovaries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you react negatively to this type of treatment at
the age you are now?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 or 4 and kjonn = 2 and r16kreft1 = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very large extent |
209 |
12.5% |
0.125224685 |
| 2 |
To a large extent |
129 |
7.7% |
0.077291791 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
242 |
14.5% |
0.144997004 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
439 |
26.3% |
0.263031756 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
647 |
38.8% |
0.387657280 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001797484 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11235 |
|
NA |
r16padper1
|
Variable label:
|
Which interests should elected representatives emphasize when making
political resolutions?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Elected representatives can emphasize different interests when they make
political resolutions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the three statements below do you think should be emphasized?
Elected representatives should follow
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
... the voters’ (changing) political attitudes as precise as possible |
94 |
8.3% |
0.082965578 |
| 2 |
... the party platform that they were elected on, as precise as possible |
898 |
79.3% |
0.792586055 |
| 3 |
... their own principles, experiences and sense of justice |
134 |
11.8% |
0.118270079 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006178288 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16padper2
|
Variable label:
|
How should elected representatives who disagree with their party vote?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The views of an elected representative and their party may sometimes
differ from one another.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think the elected representatives should vote in such a
situation? According to…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
... the party's view |
567 |
50.0% |
0.500441306 |
| 2 |
... their own conviction |
557 |
49.2% |
0.491615181 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007943513 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16padper3
|
Variable label:
|
How should elected representatives who disagree with their party’s
voters vote?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The views of an elected representative and their party’s voters may
sometimes differ from one another.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think the elected representatives should vote in such a
situation? According to…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
... the views of the party’s voters |
674 |
59.5% |
0.59488085 |
| 2 |
... their own conviction |
440 |
38.8% |
0.38834951 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.7% |
0.01676964 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16padper4
|
Variable label:
|
Which group should an elected representative represent?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following groups do you think that you as an elected
representative should mainly represent?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Those who voted for the party of the elected representative |
609 |
53.8% |
0.537511033 |
| 2 |
All voters in the county or municipality where they are elected |
480 |
42.4% |
0.423654016 |
| 3 |
Voters with the same background and experience as them |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007943513 |
| 4 |
Those who have voted for them personally |
21 |
1.9% |
0.018534863 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.2% |
0.012356575 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16padper5
|
Variable label:
|
What motive should be normative for voters when they vote?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Voters may have different motives for their choice of party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What motive among the three below do you think should be normative for
voters when they vote? Voters should vote for the party that…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
... they think has conducted a policy that they agree with the most |
544 |
48.0% |
0.480141218 |
| 2 |
... has political plans that are closest to their own political views |
571 |
50.4% |
0.503971756 |
| 3 |
... has elected representatives with the same background and experience as
themselves |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008826125 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.7% |
0.007060900 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16padper6
|
Variable label:
|
How should the voter contribute to play an important role in policy
making?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Voters can sometimes play an important role in the parties’ policy
making.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In what way do you think the voters’ input is most important? Voters
contribute…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
... to develop the future party programme |
241 |
21.3% |
0.21270962 |
| 2 |
... by expressing their political opinions in the period between elections |
712 |
62.8% |
0.62842012 |
| 3 |
... in the selection of possible representatives who are similar to the voters
themselves |
163 |
14.4% |
0.14386584 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.5% |
0.01500441 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16meme10_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
either r16meme10a, r16meme10b, r16meme10ce or r16meme10d.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects
either r16meme10a, r16meme10b, r16meme10ce or r16meme10d.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1133] [Invalid:11771]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Chooses r16meme10a |
274 |
24.2% |
0.2418358 |
| 2 |
Chooses r16meme10b |
290 |
25.6% |
0.2559576 |
| 3 |
Chooses r16meme10c |
275 |
24.3% |
0.2427184 |
| 4 |
Chooses r16meme10d |
294 |
25.9% |
0.2594881 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11771 |
|
NA |
r16meme10a
|
Variable label:
|
How should the number of asylum applications per country be determined?
(question variant 1)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask you about your thoughts regarding asylum
seekers in Europe (i.e. people who have left their homeland and are
requesting lawful asylum in Europe because they fear persecution in
their own homeland). European countries have adopted joint regulations
for granting asylum to refugees. We are interested in your views
regarding a number of alternatives within asylum policy that are
currently being debated. In accordance with applicable law, asylum
seekers, as a general rule, must submit an application to the European
country in which they first arrive (i.e. “country of arrival”). The aim
of this policy is to maximise efficiency. Some, however, have pointed
out that the applicable regulations cause an unfair burden on
borderlands that increasingly serve as places of arrival for asylum
seekers. Therefore, they either recommend allocating asylum applications
evenly across all countries or based on each country’s capacity.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think the number of asylum applications per country should be
determined? The number of asylum applications allocated to each European
country should be…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16meme10_ran = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
based on the country of arrival (i.e. asylum seekers must submit their
application to the European country in which they first arrive). |
51 |
18.6% |
0.18613139 |
| 2 |
equal allocation for all European countries (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated
so that each European country receives the same number of asylum applications). |
18 |
6.6% |
0.06569343 |
| 3 |
proportional to the country’s capacity (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated to
the different European countries based on the country’s population, financial
situation (gross domestic product), unemployment rate and number of previous
applications). |
203 |
74.1% |
0.74087591 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.7% |
0.00729927 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12630 |
|
NA |
r16meme10b
|
Variable label:
|
How should the number of asylum applications per country be determined?
(question variant 2)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask you about your thoughts regarding asylum
seekers in Europe (i.e. people who have left their homeland and are
requesting lawful asylum in Europe because they fear persecution in
their own homeland). European countries have adopted joint regulations
for granting asylum to refugees. We are interested in your views
regarding a number of alternatives within asylum policy that are
currently being debated. In accordance with applicable law, asylum
seekers, as a general rule, must submit an application to the European
country in which they first arrive (i.e. “country of arrival”). The aim
of this policy is to maximise efficiency. Some, however, have pointed
out that the applicable regulations cause an unfair burden on
borderlands that increasingly serve as places of arrival for asylum
seekers. Therefore, they either recommend allocating asylum applications
evenly across all countries or based on each country’s capacity.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think the number of asylum applications per country should be
determined? The number of asylum applications allocated to each European
country should be…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16meme10_ran = 2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
based on the country of arrival (i.e. asylum seekers must submit their
application to the European country in which they first arrive). This meant that
in 2015, approximately 31 100 applications were allocated to Norway. |
49 |
16.9% |
0.16896552 |
| 2 |
equal allocation for all European countries (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated
so that each European country receives the same number of asylum applications).
This means that in 2015, approximately 43 200 applications would have been
assigned to Norway. |
21 |
7.2% |
0.07241379 |
| 3 |
proportional to the country’s capacity (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated to
the different European countries based on the country’s population, financial
situation (gross domestic product), unemployment rate and number of previous
applications). [...] |
213 |
73.4% |
0.73448276 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
2.4% |
0.02413793 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12614 |
|
NA |
r16meme10c
|
Variable label:
|
How should the number of asylum applications per country be determined?
(question variant 3)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask you about your thoughts regarding asylum
seekers in Europe (i.e. people who have left their homeland and are
requesting lawful asylum in Europe because they fear persecution in
their own homeland). European countries have adopted joint regulations
for granting asylum to refugees. We are interested in your views
regarding a number of alternatives within asylum policy that are
currently being debated. In accordance with applicable law, asylum
seekers, as a general rule, must submit an application to the European
country in which they first arrive (i.e. “country of arrival”). The aim
of this policy is to maximise efficiency. Some, however, have pointed
out that the applicable regulations cause an unfair burden on
borderlands that increasingly serve as places of arrival for asylum
seekers. Therefore, they either recommend allocating asylum applications
evenly across all countries or based on each country’s capacity.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think the number of asylum applications per country should be
determined? The number of asylum applications allocated to each European
country should be…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16meme10_ran = 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
based on the country of arrival (i.e. asylum seekers must submit their
application to the European country in which they first arrive). This meant that
in 2018, approximately 2 700 applications were allocated to Norway. |
82 |
29.8% |
0.29818182 |
| 2 |
equal allocation for all European countries (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated
so that each European country receives the same number of asylum applications).
This means that in 2018, approximately 20 800 applications would have been
assigned to Norway. |
7 |
2.5% |
0.02545455 |
| 3 |
proportional to the country’s capacity (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated to
the different European countries based on the country’s population and financial
situation (gross domestic product)). This means that in 2018, approximately 10
100 [...] |
182 |
66.2% |
0.66181818 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
1.5% |
0.01454545 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12629 |
|
NA |
r16meme10d
|
Variable label:
|
How should the number of asylum applications per country be determined?
(question variant 4)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask you about your thoughts regarding asylum
seekers in Europe (i.e. people who have left their homeland and are
requesting lawful asylum in Europe because they fear persecution in
their own homeland). European countries have adopted joint regulations
for granting asylum to refugees. We are interested in your views
regarding a number of alternatives within asylum policy that are
currently being debated. In accordance with applicable law, asylum
seekers, as a general rule, must submit an application to the European
country in which they first arrive (i.e. “country of arrival”). The aim
of this policy is to maximise efficiency. Some, however, have pointed
out that the applicable regulations cause an unfair burden on
borderlands that increasingly serve as places of arrival for asylum
seekers. Therefore, they either recommend allocating asylum applications
evenly across all countries or based on each country’s capacity. In UN
meetings, many have advocated that proportional distribution based on
capacity is much fairer than current regulations.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think the number of asylum applications per country should be
determined? The number of asylum applications allocated to each European
country should be…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16meme10_ran = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
based on the country of arrival (i.e. asylum seekers must submit their
application to the European country in which they first arrive). This meant that
in 2018, approximately 2 700 applications were allocated to Norway. |
94 |
32.0% |
0.31972789 |
| 2 |
equal allocation for all European countries (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated
so that each European country receives the same number of asylum applications).
This means that in 2018, approximately 20 800 applications would have been
assigned to Norway. |
10 |
3.4% |
0.03401361 |
| 3 |
proportional to the country’s capacity (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated to
the different European countries based on the country’s population and financial
situation (gross domestic product)). This means that in 2018, approximately 10
100 [...] |
185 |
62.9% |
0.62925170 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01700680 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12610 |
|
NA |
r16meme11
|
Variable label:
|
Should European countries increase/reduce the number of people granted
asylum?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In 2018, Europe received approximately 664 820 asylum applications, and
approximately 333 355 people were granted asylum in Europe that year. As
a result of ongoing unrest in the Middle East, Africa, Eastern Europe
and elsewhere, the number of asylum applications is expected to rise.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that European countries should increase or reduce the
number of people who are granted asylum?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Increase to a large extent |
63 |
5.6% |
0.055604590 |
| 2 |
Increase |
373 |
32.9% |
0.329214475 |
| 3 |
Neither increase nor decrease |
411 |
36.3% |
0.362753751 |
| 4 |
Reduce |
163 |
14.4% |
0.143865843 |
| 5 |
Reduce to a large extent |
117 |
10.3% |
0.103265666 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005295675 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16meme12
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norway increase/reduce the number of people granted asylum?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In 2018, Norway received 2 660 asylum applications and granted asylum to
1 755 people. As a result of ongoing unrest in the Middle East, Africa,
Eastern Europe and elsewhere, the number of asylum applications is
expected to rise.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Norway should increase or reduce the number of people
who are granted asylum?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Increase to a large extent |
98 |
8.6% |
0.086496028 |
| 2 |
Increase |
415 |
36.6% |
0.366284201 |
| 3 |
Neither increase nor decrease |
381 |
33.6% |
0.336275375 |
| 4 |
Reduce |
128 |
11.3% |
0.112974404 |
| 5 |
Reduce to a large extent |
100 |
8.8% |
0.088261253 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.0% |
0.009708738 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16meme13_1
|
Variable label:
|
Do you have one or more refugees among your closest neighbours?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are some questions about your neighbourhood. We would like to know
if there are people with refugee backgrounds living close to where you
live, in other words, people who came to Norway as refugees at some
point and are now living here.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have one or more refugees among your closest neighbours?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
387 |
34.2% |
0.341571050 |
| 2 |
No |
554 |
48.9% |
0.488967343 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
190 |
16.8% |
0.167696381 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001765225 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16meme13_2a
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think about having one or more refugees among your closest
neighbours?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about having one or more refugees among your closest
neighbours?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16meme13_1 = 1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It is okay |
278 |
71.8% |
0.718346253 |
| 2 |
It is not okay |
24 |
6.2% |
0.062015504 |
| 3 |
It does not matter |
82 |
21.2% |
0.211886305 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.8% |
0.007751938 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12517 |
|
NA |
r16meme13_2b
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think about getting one or more refugees among your closest
neighbours?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about getting one or more refugees among your closest
neighbours?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16meme13_1 = 2 or 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It is okay |
448 |
60.2% |
0.60215054 |
| 2 |
It is not okay |
79 |
10.6% |
0.10618280 |
| 3 |
It does not matter |
212 |
28.5% |
0.28494624 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.7% |
0.00672043 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12160 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_1
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Reserved
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…is reserved
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
988 |
20.0% |
0.20040568 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1147 |
23.3% |
0.23265720 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
873 |
17.7% |
0.17707911 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1499 |
30.4% |
0.30405680 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
298 |
6.0% |
0.06044625 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
125 |
2.5% |
0.02535497 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_2
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Generally trusting
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…is generally trusting
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
149 |
3.0% |
0.03022312 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
399 |
8.1% |
0.08093306 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
527 |
10.7% |
0.10689655 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
2147 |
43.5% |
0.43549696 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
1617 |
32.8% |
0.32799189 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
91 |
1.8% |
0.01845842 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_3
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Tends to be lazy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…tends to be lazy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
1769 |
35.9% |
0.35882353 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1247 |
25.3% |
0.25294118 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
779 |
15.8% |
0.15801217 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
831 |
16.9% |
0.16855984 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
198 |
4.0% |
0.04016227 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
106 |
2.2% |
0.02150101 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_4
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Relaxed, handles stress well
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is relaxed, handles stress well
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
212 |
4.3% |
0.04300203 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
884 |
17.9% |
0.17931034 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
801 |
16.2% |
0.16247465 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1908 |
38.7% |
0.38701826 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
1033 |
21.0% |
0.20953347 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
92 |
1.9% |
0.01866126 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_5
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Has few artistic interests
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… has few artistic interests
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
1418 |
28.8% |
0.28762677 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1395 |
28.3% |
0.28296146 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
786 |
15.9% |
0.15943205 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
875 |
17.7% |
0.17748479 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
354 |
7.2% |
0.07180527 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
102 |
2.1% |
0.02068966 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_6
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Outgoing, sociable
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is outgoing, sociable
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
229 |
4.6% |
0.04645030 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
625 |
12.7% |
0.12677485 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
784 |
15.9% |
0.15902637 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1731 |
35.1% |
0.35111562 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
1485 |
30.1% |
0.30121704 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
76 |
1.5% |
0.01541582 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_7
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Tends to find fault with others
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… tends to find fault with others
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
830 |
16.8% |
0.16835700 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1396 |
28.3% |
0.28316430 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1344 |
27.3% |
0.27261663 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1070 |
21.7% |
0.21703854 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
176 |
3.6% |
0.03569980 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
114 |
2.3% |
0.02312373 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_8
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Does a thorough job
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… does a thorough job
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
92 |
1.9% |
0.01866126 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
99 |
2.0% |
0.02008114 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
364 |
7.4% |
0.07383367 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1822 |
37.0% |
0.36957404 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
2459 |
49.9% |
0.49878296 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
94 |
1.9% |
0.01906694 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_9
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Get nervous easily
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… get nervous easily
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
1333 |
27.0% |
0.27038540 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1308 |
26.5% |
0.26531440 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
912 |
18.5% |
0.18498986 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1018 |
20.6% |
0.20649087 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
257 |
5.2% |
0.05212982 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
102 |
2.1% |
0.02068966 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_10
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Has an active imagination
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… has an active imagination
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
384 |
7.8% |
0.07789047 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
618 |
12.5% |
0.12535497 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1141 |
23.1% |
0.23144016 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1614 |
32.7% |
0.32738337 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
1073 |
21.8% |
0.21764706 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
100 |
2.0% |
0.02028398 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk26
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
21 |
0.4% |
0.004259635 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or
lower secondary school) |
299 |
6.1% |
0.060649087 |
| 3 |
Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School, business college) |
518 |
10.5% |
0.105070994 |
| 4 |
Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2,
VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) |
749 |
15.2% |
0.151926978 |
| 5 |
Craft training/shorter education programmes (e.g. vocational school, technical
school/college, maritime vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot
training, secretary school, home industry school/handicrafts school, master
craftsman certificate tr |
465 |
9.4% |
0.094320487 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university
college graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
352 |
7.1% |
0.071399594 |
| 7 |
College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime
subjects, military subjects etc.) |
979 |
19.9% |
0.198580122 |
| 8 |
University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) |
359 |
7.3% |
0.072819473 |
| 9 |
University college – 5-6 year education (MA, hovedfag or longer vocational
education on a university college level) |
298 |
6.0% |
0.060446247 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered
engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) |
671 |
13.6% |
0.136105477 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
102 |
2.1% |
0.020689655 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
111 |
2.3% |
0.022515213 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001217039 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk26_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom r16group = 6 eller 7. ]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
21 |
0.4% |
0.004259635 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or
lower secondary school) |
309 |
6.3% |
0.062677485 |
| 3 |
Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School, business college) |
538 |
10.9% |
0.109127789 |
| 4 |
Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2,
VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) |
767 |
15.6% |
0.155578093 |
| 5 |
Craft training/shorter education programmes (e.g. vocational school, technical
school/college, maritime vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot
training, secretary school, home industry school/handicrafts school, master
craftsman certificate tr |
479 |
9.7% |
0.097160243 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university
college graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
354 |
7.2% |
0.071805274 |
| 7 |
College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime
subjects, military subjects etc.) |
995 |
20.2% |
0.201825558 |
| 8 |
University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) |
367 |
7.4% |
0.074442191 |
| 9 |
University college – 5-6 year education (MA, hovedfag or longer vocational
education on a university college level) |
300 |
6.1% |
0.060851927 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered
engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) |
672 |
13.6% |
0.136308316 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
104 |
2.1% |
0.021095335 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
18 |
0.4% |
0.003651116 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001217039 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk26_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R16BK26_12] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
None of the above (please enter):
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16bk25
|
Variable label:
|
What is your current income? (Gross annual income)
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
< 150 000 |
484 |
9.8% |
0.09817444 |
| 2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
624 |
12.7% |
0.12657201 |
| 3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
680 |
13.8% |
0.13793103 |
| 4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
842 |
17.1% |
0.17079108 |
| 5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
795 |
16.1% |
0.16125761 |
| 6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
513 |
10.4% |
0.10405680 |
| 7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
625 |
12.7% |
0.12677485 |
| 8 |
> 1 000 000 |
286 |
5.8% |
0.05801217 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
1.6% |
0.01643002 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk33
|
Variable label:
|
Which of the descriptions applies to what you have been doing for the
last 7 days?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
2337 |
47.4% |
0.474036511 |
| 2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
231 |
4.7% |
0.046855984 |
| 3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
218 |
4.4% |
0.044219067 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
212 |
4.3% |
0.043002028 |
| 5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
323 |
6.6% |
0.065517241 |
| 6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
67 |
1.4% |
0.013590264 |
| 7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
32 |
0.6% |
0.006490872 |
| 8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
261 |
5.3% |
0.052941176 |
| 9 |
Retired |
1037 |
21.0% |
0.210344828 |
| 10 |
In military service |
11 |
0.2% |
0.002231237 |
| 11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other Persons |
34 |
0.7% |
0.006896552 |
| 12 |
Other: |
162 |
3.3% |
0.032860041 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.1% |
0.001014199 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk33_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which of the descriptions applies to what you have been doing for the
last 7 days? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom r16group = 6 eller 7. ]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
2370 |
48.1% |
0.480730223 |
| 2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
235 |
4.8% |
0.047667343 |
| 3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
233 |
4.7% |
0.047261663 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
220 |
4.5% |
0.044624746 |
| 5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
357 |
7.2% |
0.072413793 |
| 6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
72 |
1.5% |
0.014604462 |
| 7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
34 |
0.7% |
0.006896552 |
| 8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
283 |
5.7% |
0.057403651 |
| 9 |
Retired |
1059 |
21.5% |
0.214807302 |
| 10 |
In military service |
11 |
0.2% |
0.002231237 |
| 11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other Persons |
36 |
0.7% |
0.007302231 |
| 12 |
Other: |
15 |
0.3% |
0.003042596 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.1% |
0.001014199 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk33_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R16BK33_12] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16bk21
|
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
324 |
11.6% |
0.116295765 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
849 |
30.5% |
0.304737976 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
170 |
6.1% |
0.061019383 |
| 4 |
Private business |
1324 |
47.5% |
0.475233309 |
| 5 |
Self-employed |
17 |
0.6% |
0.006101938 |
| 6 |
Other: |
97 |
3.5% |
0.034816942 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001794688 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10118 |
|
NA |
r16bk21_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom r16group = 6 eller 7 og r16bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3. ]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
326 |
11.7% |
0.117013640 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
851 |
30.5% |
0.305455851 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
176 |
6.3% |
0.063173008 |
| 4 |
Private business |
1340 |
48.1% |
0.480976310 |
| 5 |
Self-employed |
17 |
0.6% |
0.006101938 |
| 6 |
Other: |
71 |
2.5% |
0.025484566 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001794688 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10118 |
|
NA |
r16bk21_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open [R16BK21_6] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16arbeidolje1
|
Variable label:
|
[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely
associated with it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely
associated with it?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9. Respondents
who are currently employed were not given an response option 5. Retired
respondents were not given an response option 3. The wording of the
question is in present tense for the employed, while in past tense for
the retirees. See r16bk33.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I [work/worked] in the oil or gas industry |
193 |
4.8% |
0.047831475 |
| 2 |
Yes, my job [is/was] closely associated with the oil or gas industry |
172 |
4.3% |
0.042627014 |
| 3 |
No, but previously I have worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely
associated with it |
133 |
3.3% |
0.032961586 |
| 4 |
No |
3513 |
87.1% |
0.870631970 |
| 5 |
I have not been employed |
14 |
0.3% |
0.003469641 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.2% |
0.002478315 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8869 |
|
NA |
r16_arbeidolje2
|
Variable label:
|
When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry?
|
|
Literal question:
|
When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry (or your
first job closely associated with the oil and gas industry)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 and
r16arbeidolje1 = 1 | 2 | 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Before 1980 |
79 |
15.9% |
0.15863454 |
| 2 |
1980-89 |
107 |
21.5% |
0.21485944 |
| 3 |
1990-99 |
101 |
20.3% |
0.20281124 |
| 4 |
2000-2009 |
127 |
25.5% |
0.25502008 |
| 5 |
After 2009 |
79 |
15.9% |
0.15863454 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
1.0% |
0.01004016 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12406 |
|
NA |
r16arbeidolje_2b
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Additional coments to work in the oil/gas industry [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have additional comments, please write them here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 and
r16arbeidolje1 = 1 | 2 | 3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16bk35
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
1223 |
24.8% |
0.248073022 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
949 |
19.2% |
0.192494929 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
1419 |
28.8% |
0.287829615 |
| 4 |
A village |
805 |
16.3% |
0.163286004 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
525 |
10.6% |
0.106490872 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.2% |
0.001825558 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk27
|
Variable label:
|
Martial status
|
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
742 |
15.1% |
0.150507099 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
307 |
6.2% |
0.062271805 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
898 |
18.2% |
0.182150101 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
2551 |
51.7% |
0.517444219 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
262 |
5.3% |
0.053144016 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
140 |
2.8% |
0.028397566 |
| 7 |
Other |
17 |
0.3% |
0.003448276 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.3% |
0.002636917 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk27_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Martial status [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom r16group = 6 eller 7. ]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
744 |
15.1% |
0.150912779 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
310 |
6.3% |
0.062880325 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
899 |
18.2% |
0.182352941 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
2553 |
51.8% |
0.517849899 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
263 |
5.3% |
0.053346856 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
140 |
2.8% |
0.028397566 |
| 7 |
Other |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001622718 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.3% |
0.002636917 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk27_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Civil status [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16bk42
|
Variable label:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in
that case how many?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in
that case how many?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
None |
3700 |
75.1% |
0.7505070994 |
| 1 |
1 |
481 |
9.8% |
0.0975659229 |
| 2 |
2 |
543 |
11.0% |
0.1101419878 |
| 3 |
3 |
155 |
3.1% |
0.0314401623 |
| 4 |
4 |
24 |
0.5% |
0.0048681542 |
| 5 |
5 |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0010141988 |
| 6 |
6 or more |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0004056795 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.4% |
0.0040567951 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bkhelse
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
841 |
17.1% |
0.170588235 |
| 2 |
Very good |
1778 |
36.1% |
0.360649087 |
| 3 |
Good |
1466 |
29.7% |
0.297363083 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
647 |
13.1% |
0.131237323 |
| 5 |
Poor |
191 |
3.9% |
0.038742394 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001419878 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16pkklasse
|
Variable label:
|
Place yourself in a social class
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups
or classes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it
be?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lower class |
63 |
1.3% |
0.012778905 |
| 2 |
Working class |
724 |
14.7% |
0.146855984 |
| 3 |
Lower middle class |
544 |
11.0% |
0.110344828 |
| 4 |
Middle class |
2500 |
50.7% |
0.507099391 |
| 5 |
Upper middle class |
836 |
17.0% |
0.169574037 |
| 6 |
Upper class |
23 |
0.5% |
0.004665314 |
| 7 |
Don't know |
231 |
4.7% |
0.046855984 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.2% |
0.001825558 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk40
|
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12904]
[Range:-]
|
r16bk40_recode
|
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. Recoded from source variable r16bk40]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
2908 |
59.0% |
0.589858012 |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
94 |
1.9% |
0.019066937 |
| 3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
215 |
4.4% |
0.043610548 |
| 4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
71 |
1.4% |
0.014401623 |
| 5 |
Islam |
94 |
1.9% |
0.019066937 |
| 6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities |
1534 |
31.1% |
0.311156187 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.3% |
0.002839757 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk41
|
Variable label:
|
How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12
months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often
have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001622718 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
77 |
1.6% |
0.015618661 |
| 3 |
Once a week |
101 |
2.0% |
0.020486815 |
| 4 |
Once or a few times a month |
167 |
3.4% |
0.033874239 |
| 5 |
Several times a year |
502 |
10.2% |
0.101825558 |
| 6 |
Once a year |
698 |
14.2% |
0.141582150 |
| 7 |
Less than once a year |
827 |
16.8% |
0.167748479 |
| 8 |
Never |
2533 |
51.4% |
0.513793103 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.3% |
0.003448276 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk28
|
Variable label:
|
Your citizenship
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
4533 |
91.9% |
0.919472617 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
391 |
7.9% |
0.079310345 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001217039 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk28_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Citizenship of a different country [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16bk29
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
4315 |
87.5% |
0.875253550 |
| 2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
409 |
8.3% |
0.082961460 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
40 |
0.8% |
0.008113590 |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
75 |
1.5% |
0.015212982 |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
84 |
1.7% |
0.017038540 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001419878 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk30
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which country did you live in before you immigrated? [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did you live in before you immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk29 = 2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16bk30_1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which country did your mother live in before your parents
immigrated? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both) live in before
they immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Mother
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk29 = 3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16bk30_1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Which country did your father live in before your parents
immigrated? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both) live in before
they immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Father
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk29 = 3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16bk30_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: In which country did your mother live before she immigrated? [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your mother live before she immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk29 = 4. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16bk30_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open: In which country did your father live before he immigrated? [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your father live before he immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk29 = 5. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r16P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
6353 |
49.2% |
0.492328 |
| 2 |
Female |
6551 |
50.8% |
0.507672 |
r16P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
3672 |
28.5% |
0.28456293 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
2956 |
22.9% |
0.22907626 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
665 |
5.2% |
0.05153441 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
3498 |
27.1% |
0.27107874 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
1087 |
8.4% |
0.08423745 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
1026 |
8.0% |
0.07951023 |
r16P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-18]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus |
1680 |
13.0% |
0.13019219 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
1992 |
15.4% |
0.15437074 |
| 3 |
Østfold |
627 |
4.9% |
0.04858958 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
608 |
4.7% |
0.04711717 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
366 |
2.8% |
0.02836330 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
354 |
2.7% |
0.02743335 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
648 |
5.0% |
0.05021699 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
353 |
2.7% |
0.02735586 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
423 |
3.3% |
0.03278053 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
242 |
1.9% |
0.01875387 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
1194 |
9.3% |
0.09252945 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
1539 |
11.9% |
0.11926534 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
235 |
1.8% |
0.01821141 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
530 |
4.1% |
0.04107254 |
| 15 |
Trøndelag |
1087 |
8.4% |
0.08423745 |
| 16 |
Nordland |
492 |
3.8% |
0.03812771 |
| 17 |
Troms |
392 |
3.0% |
0.03037818 |
| 18 |
Finmark |
142 |
1.1% |
0.01100434 |
r16P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
865 |
6.7% |
0.06703348 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
4001 |
31.0% |
0.31005890 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
7622 |
59.1% |
0.59066956 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
416 |
3.2% |
0.03223807 |
r16P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
47 |
0.4% |
0.003642281 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
818 |
6.3% |
0.063391197 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
1384 |
10.7% |
0.107253565 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1709 |
13.2% |
0.132439554 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
908 |
7.0% |
0.070365778 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
1095 |
8.5% |
0.084857409 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2650 |
20.5% |
0.205362678 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
938 |
7.3% |
0.072690639 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
839 |
6.5% |
0.065018599 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1826 |
14.2% |
0.141506510 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
274 |
2.1% |
0.021233726 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
312 |
2.4% |
0.024178549 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
104 |
0.8% |
0.008059516 |
r16P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
342 |
2.7% |
0.02650341 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
1998 |
15.5% |
0.15483571 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
2923 |
22.7% |
0.22651891 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
2759 |
21.4% |
0.21380967 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
2033 |
15.8% |
0.15754805 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
1505 |
11.7% |
0.11663050 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
1344 |
10.4% |
0.10415375 |
r16P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
5263 |
40.8% |
0.4078580 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
6297 |
48.8% |
0.4879882 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
1344 |
10.4% |
0.1041538 |
r16Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-3]
|
r16Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation
report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-14]
|
r16Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-3]
|
