Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Mette Andersson, Sveinung Arnesen, Gisela Böhm, Dag Elgesem, Odd Gåsdal,
Kristin Strømsnes, Endre Tvinnereim, and Jacob Aars
|
Scientific Team, University of Bergen and Rokkansenteret
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
The gross sample of wave 2 were the 4 863 panel members who registered
their email address in wave 1. In wave 1 the gross sample were 25 000
individuals above the age of 18 randomly drawn from the Norwegian
Population Registry. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for
the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private
IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel
after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax
Administration.
The sample received from Evry contained the following information: a)
surname, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age. The sample
excluded people with no current home address in Norway. Furthermore, all
individuals over the age of 95 were excluded from the sample. This
amounted to 58 persons, thus leaving a net sample of 24 942 individuals
before the recruitment process started.
Mode of Data Collection
Norwegian Citizen Panel is a web-based survey. Wave 2 recruited
respondents per email among the existing panel members.
The recruitment process was done in several steps. First, all panel
members received an invitation by email. The email contained the
following information; a) description of the projeckt, b) the Citizen
Panel’s policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the anonymity of
the participators, c) contact information for the people responsible for
the project, d) a unique we address to the questionnaire, e) the
estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes), f)
information about the lottery of a travel gift card.
In order to maximize the response rate, an incentive in the form of a
travel gift card was included in the project. The value of the gift card
was 25 000 NOK. To enter the lottery respondents were required to
complete the wave 2 questionnaire. Information on the lottery was
included in all correspondence with respondents.
The invitation was emailed on the 10th of March 2014.
Three reminders were sent at the following dates: 13th of March, 17th of
March, and 20th of March. The reminder was sent to those who a) had not
entered the questionnarie, and b) had not completed the questionnaire.
The respondents were encouraged to participate by referring to the
number of participants and the importance of various topics in the
survey. The unique we address to the questionnaire were also included in
the reminders.
Wave 2 was closed 31st of March 2014.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix).
When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s
geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These
attributes were included in the sample file we received from the
Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of
education is provided by the respondents when answering the
questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer
this question. Because of this, two different weights have been
calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset. We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in
any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate
compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample. An
illustration of this is provided in table 5 which shows the effect of
weight 2 on the distribution of self-reported level of education in the
net sample:
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 2
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
w02_weight4
|
New
variable: Added w02_weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
w02_weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-15
|
W02_P4_2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 2
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
w02_km236
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
w02_km219
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-09
|
w02_dt201
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
w02_k201
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
w02_k203
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
|
NA
|
2018-11-07
|
w02_k206_1_kod
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
|
NA
|
2018-11-07
|
w02_k206_2_kod
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
|
NA
|
2018-11-07
|
w02_k206_3_kod
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w02_p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w02_p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2017-11-28
|
w02_k206_1-3
|
Added anonymized data and associated coded variables.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
w02p4_1
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
w02p4_2
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2015-05-29
|
w02_k206_1_kod
|
New
variable based on w02_k206_1
|
|
NA
|
2015-05-29
|
w02_k206_2_kod
|
New
variable based on w02_k206_2
|
|
NA
|
2015-05-29
|
w02_k206_3_kod
|
New
variable based on w02_k206_3
|
|
v-100
|
2014-04-11
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 2
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 2 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
3372
|
|
# Variables
|
482
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_u
|
Variable label:
|
u
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
1719 |
51.0% |
0.5097865 |
| 2 |
2 |
1653 |
49.0% |
0.4902135 |
w02_k201
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with current government
|
|
Literal question:
|
First we will ask some general questions on your own opinion of politics
and society in Norway today. How satisfied are you with the current
government?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
152 |
4.5% |
0.045077106 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1242 |
36.8% |
0.368327402 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1170 |
34.7% |
0.346975089 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
611 |
18.1% |
0.181198102 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
188 |
5.6% |
0.055753262 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.3% |
0.002669039 |
w02_k202
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway? Do you
believe it is
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
921 |
27.3% |
0.273131673 |
| 2 |
Good |
1821 |
54.0% |
0.540035587 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
383 |
11.4% |
0.113582444 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
146 |
4.3% |
0.043297746 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
68 |
2.0% |
0.020166074 |
| 6 |
Bad |
13 |
0.4% |
0.003855279 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001186240 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
0.5% |
0.004744958 |
w02_k203
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with democracy
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy
works in Norway?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
676 |
20.0% |
0.200474496 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1942 |
57.6% |
0.575919336 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
580 |
17.2% |
0.172004745 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
143 |
4.2% |
0.042408066 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
21 |
0.6% |
0.006227758 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
0.3% |
0.002965599 |
w02_k204
|
Variable label:
|
Party preference if elections tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
What would you vote if there were an election to the Storting tomorrow?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
979 |
29.0% |
0.290332147 |
| 2 |
The Progress Party |
307 |
9.1% |
0.091043891 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party |
850 |
25.2% |
0.252075919 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
157 |
4.7% |
0.046559905 |
| 5 |
The Centre Party |
91 |
2.7% |
0.026986951 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
137 |
4.1% |
0.040628707 |
| 7 |
The Liberal Party |
223 |
6.6% |
0.066132859 |
| 8 |
Red |
65 |
1.9% |
0.019276394 |
| 9 |
The Green Party |
168 |
5.0% |
0.049822064 |
| 10 |
Other |
34 |
1.0% |
0.010083037 |
| 11 |
Would not vote |
51 |
1.5% |
0.015124555 |
| 12 |
Cannot vote |
84 |
2.5% |
0.024911032 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
0.3% |
0.002965599 |
| 99 |
Don't know |
216 |
6.4% |
0.064056940 |
w02_k204_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Party preference if elections tomorrow [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What would you vote if there were an election to the Storting tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_k205ac_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The state should contribute to reducing income inequalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The state should contribute to reducing inequalities in income in
society.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
645 |
19.1% |
0.191281139 |
| 2 |
Agree |
969 |
28.7% |
0.287366548 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
925 |
27.4% |
0.274317912 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
291 |
8.6% |
0.086298932 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
270 |
8.0% |
0.080071174 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
201 |
6.0% |
0.059608541 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
51 |
1.5% |
0.015124555 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
0.6% |
0.005931198 |
w02_k205ac_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Better if there is a diversity of different religions and
views on life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different
religions and views on life.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
353 |
10.5% |
0.104685647 |
| 2 |
Agree |
862 |
25.6% |
0.255634638 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
767 |
22.7% |
0.227461447 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
434 |
12.9% |
0.128706999 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
434 |
12.9% |
0.128706999 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
314 |
9.3% |
0.093119810 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
177 |
5.2% |
0.052491103 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
0.9% |
0.009193357 |
w02_k205ac_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Emission reductions should be made abroad.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Most of the emission reductions Norway is committed to should be made
abroad.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
125 |
3.7% |
0.03706999 |
| 2 |
Agree |
302 |
9.0% |
0.08956109 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
492 |
14.6% |
0.14590747 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
839 |
24.9% |
0.24881376 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
532 |
15.8% |
0.15776987 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
733 |
21.7% |
0.21737841 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
306 |
9.1% |
0.09074733 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
1.3% |
0.01275208 |
w02_k206_1
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - text [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_k206_1_kod
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - coded
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1001-900906]
|
w02_k206_2
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - text [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_k206_2_kod
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - coded
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1001-900906]
|
w02_k206_3
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - text [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_k206_3_kod
|
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - coded
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1001-900906]
|
w02_k207_1
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics one often speaks of the “left wing” and “right wing.” Below
is a scale where 0 represents those who are at the far left politically,
while 10 represents those who are at the far right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 Left |
31 |
0.9% |
0.009193357 |
| 1 |
1 |
69 |
2.0% |
0.020462633 |
| 2 |
2 |
224 |
6.6% |
0.066429419 |
| 3 |
3 |
497 |
14.7% |
0.147390273 |
| 4 |
4 |
424 |
12.6% |
0.125741400 |
| 5 |
5 |
551 |
16.3% |
0.163404508 |
| 6 |
6 |
436 |
12.9% |
0.129300119 |
| 7 |
7 |
579 |
17.2% |
0.171708185 |
| 8 |
8 |
338 |
10.0% |
0.100237248 |
| 9 |
9 |
112 |
3.3% |
0.033214709 |
| 10 |
10 Right |
68 |
2.0% |
0.020166074 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
1.3% |
0.012752076 |
w02_k6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
346 |
10.3% |
0.10260973 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
634 |
18.8% |
0.18801898 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
805 |
23.9% |
0.23873072 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
667 |
19.8% |
0.19780546 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
627 |
18.6% |
0.18594306 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
200 |
5.9% |
0.05931198 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
35 |
1.0% |
0.01037960 |
| 97 |
No answer |
58 |
1.7% |
0.01720047 |
w02_k6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
80 |
2.4% |
0.02372479 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
330 |
9.8% |
0.09786477 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
575 |
17.1% |
0.17052195 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
364 |
10.8% |
0.10794781 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
896 |
26.6% |
0.26571767 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
852 |
25.3% |
0.25266904 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
208 |
6.2% |
0.06168446 |
| 97 |
No answer |
67 |
2.0% |
0.01986951 |
w02_k6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
764 |
22.7% |
0.22657177 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
641 |
19.0% |
0.19009490 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
527 |
15.6% |
0.15628707 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
317 |
9.4% |
0.09400949 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
610 |
18.1% |
0.18090154 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
339 |
10.1% |
0.10053381 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
118 |
3.5% |
0.03499407 |
| 97 |
No answer |
56 |
1.7% |
0.01660735 |
w02_k6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
129 |
3.8% |
0.03825623 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
289 |
8.6% |
0.08570581 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
607 |
18.0% |
0.18001186 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
922 |
27.3% |
0.27342823 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
904 |
26.8% |
0.26809015 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
397 |
11.8% |
0.11773428 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
57 |
1.7% |
0.01690391 |
| 97 |
No answer |
67 |
2.0% |
0.01986951 |
w02_k6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
536 |
15.9% |
0.15895611 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
585 |
17.3% |
0.17348754 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
623 |
18.5% |
0.18475682 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
601 |
17.8% |
0.17823250 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
610 |
18.1% |
0.18090154 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
292 |
8.7% |
0.08659549 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
66 |
2.0% |
0.01957295 |
| 97 |
No answer |
59 |
1.7% |
0.01749703 |
w02_k6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
243 |
7.2% |
0.072064057 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
498 |
14.8% |
0.147686833 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
850 |
25.2% |
0.252075919 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
981 |
29.1% |
0.290925267 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
561 |
16.6% |
0.166370107 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
146 |
4.3% |
0.043297746 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
23 |
0.7% |
0.006820878 |
| 97 |
No answer |
70 |
2.1% |
0.020759193 |
w02_k6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
229 |
6.8% |
0.06791222 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
303 |
9.0% |
0.08985765 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
451 |
13.4% |
0.13374852 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1068 |
31.7% |
0.31672598 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
816 |
24.2% |
0.24199288 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
348 |
10.3% |
0.10320285 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
101 |
3.0% |
0.02995255 |
| 97 |
No answer |
56 |
1.7% |
0.01660735 |
w02_k6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
135 |
4.0% |
0.04003559 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
259 |
7.7% |
0.07680902 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
517 |
15.3% |
0.15332147 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
443 |
13.1% |
0.13137604 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
943 |
28.0% |
0.27965599 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
811 |
24.1% |
0.24051008 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
209 |
6.2% |
0.06198102 |
| 97 |
No answer |
55 |
1.6% |
0.01631079 |
w02_k6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Red
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Red
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly dislike |
779 |
23.1% |
0.23102017 |
| 2 |
Somewhat dislike |
666 |
19.8% |
0.19750890 |
| 3 |
Misliker noe |
526 |
15.6% |
0.15599051 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
735 |
21.8% |
0.21797153 |
| 5 |
Somewhat like |
417 |
12.4% |
0.12366548 |
| 6 |
Significantly like |
140 |
4.2% |
0.04151839 |
| 7 |
Strongly like |
38 |
1.1% |
0.01126928 |
| 97 |
No answer |
71 |
2.1% |
0.02105575 |
w02_k208
|
Variable label:
|
Statements describes view on climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following statements best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Choose one option.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I believe that the climate is not changing. |
29 |
0.9% |
0.008600237 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
224 |
6.6% |
0.066429419 |
| 3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it has little to do with human
action. |
805 |
23.9% |
0.238730724 |
| 4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it to a large extent is due to
human action. |
2293 |
68.0% |
0.680011862 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
0.6% |
0.006227758 |
w02_u1_s
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 into two groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 into two groups (U1-S1 og U1-S2)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1719] [Invalid:1653]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
U1_S1 |
877 |
51.0% |
0.5101803 |
| 2 |
U1_S2 |
842 |
49.0% |
0.4898197 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1653 |
|
NA |
w02_km235
|
Variable label:
|
Proportion of Norway’s population that shares opinion on climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
How great a proportion of Norway’s population do you think shares your
opinion on this matter?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All, or nearly all |
26 |
3.0% |
0.029646522 |
| 2 |
Many (more than half) |
393 |
44.8% |
0.448118586 |
| 3 |
Around half |
299 |
34.1% |
0.340935006 |
| 4 |
Some (fewer than half) |
145 |
16.5% |
0.165336374 |
| 5 |
None, or nearly none |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002280502 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.013683010 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km222
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best climate policy
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like to ask some more questions regarding the climate before
proceeding to other topics. In your opinion, which party has the best
climate policy?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
19 |
2.2% |
0.021664766 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
101 |
11.5% |
0.115165336 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
41 |
4.7% |
0.046750285 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
146 |
16.6% |
0.166476625 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
70 |
8.0% |
0.079817560 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
22 |
2.5% |
0.025085519 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
265 |
30.2% |
0.302166477 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
100 |
11.4% |
0.114025086 |
| 9 |
Red |
7 |
0.8% |
0.007981756 |
| 10 |
Other: |
60 |
6.8% |
0.068415051 |
| 97 |
No answer |
46 |
5.2% |
0.052451539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km222_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Party with the best climate policy [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like to ask some more questions regarding the climate before
proceeding to other topics. In your opinion, which party has the best
climate policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km236
|
Variable label:
|
Concerned are you about climate change [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very concerned |
96 |
10.9% |
0.10946408 |
| 2 |
Concerned |
297 |
33.9% |
0.33865450 |
| 3 |
Somewhat concerned |
316 |
36.0% |
0.36031927 |
| 4 |
Not particularly concerned |
143 |
16.3% |
0.16305587 |
| 5 |
Not at all concerned |
25 |
2.9% |
0.02850627 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 into eight groups and selects one of the following
questions: KM202a - KM202h
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1719] [Invalid:1653]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
218 |
12.7% |
0.1268179 |
| 2 |
2 |
204 |
11.9% |
0.1186736 |
| 3 |
3 |
196 |
11.4% |
0.1140198 |
| 4 |
4 |
242 |
14.1% |
0.1407795 |
| 5 |
5 |
205 |
11.9% |
0.1192554 |
| 6 |
6 |
218 |
12.7% |
0.1268179 |
| 7 |
7 |
200 |
11.6% |
0.1163467 |
| 8 |
8 |
236 |
13.7% |
0.1372891 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1653 |
|
NA |
w02_km202a
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of climate
changes in Norway immediately
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may be expensive,
but they will reduce the risk of experiencing hazardous climate changes
in Norway immediately. To which extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on measures
that reduce the risk of climate changes in Norway immediately.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
14.2% |
0.142201835 |
| 2 |
Agree |
67 |
30.7% |
0.307339450 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
57 |
26.1% |
0.261467890 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
30 |
13.8% |
0.137614679 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
19 |
8.7% |
0.087155963 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
7 |
3.2% |
0.032110092 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
6 |
2.8% |
0.027522936 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004587156 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3154 |
|
NA |
w02_km202b
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of climate
changes in the world immediately
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may be expensive,
but they will reduce the risk of experiencing hazardous climate changes
in the world immediately. To which extent do you agree or disagree with
the following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on
measures that reduce the risk of climate changes in the world
immediately?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
15.2% |
0.15196078 |
| 2 |
Agree |
58 |
28.4% |
0.28431373 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
72 |
35.3% |
0.35294118 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
20 |
9.8% |
0.09803922 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
10 |
4.9% |
0.04901961 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
7 |
3.4% |
0.03431373 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
6 |
2.9% |
0.02941176 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3168 |
|
NA |
w02_km202c
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of climate
changes in Norway in the next 50 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may be expensive,
but they will reduce the risk of experiencing hazardous climate changes
in Norway in 50 years. To which extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on measures
that reduce the risk of climate changes in Norway in 50 years.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
52 |
26.5% |
0.26530612 |
| 2 |
Agree |
62 |
31.6% |
0.31632653 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
42 |
21.4% |
0.21428571 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
24 |
12.2% |
0.12244898 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
7 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
6 |
3.1% |
0.03061224 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01530612 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3176 |
|
NA |
w02_km202d
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of climate
changes in the world in the next 50 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may be expensive,
but they will reduce the risk of experiencing hazardous climate changes
in the world in 50 years. To which extent do you agree or disagree with
the following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on
measures that reduce the risk of climate changes in the world in 50
years?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
57 |
23.6% |
0.235537190 |
| 2 |
Agree |
76 |
31.4% |
0.314049587 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
65 |
26.9% |
0.268595041 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
16 |
6.6% |
0.066115702 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
9 |
3.7% |
0.037190083 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
14 |
5.8% |
0.057851240 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
1.7% |
0.016528926 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004132231 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3130 |
|
NA |
w02_km202e
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of local
air pollution in Norway immediately
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce local air pollution may be expensive, but
they will reduce the risk of experiencing dangerously polluted air in
Norway immediately. To which extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on measures
that reduce the risk of local air pollution in Norway immediately.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
39 |
19.0% |
0.190243902 |
| 2 |
Agree |
73 |
35.6% |
0.356097561 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
59 |
28.8% |
0.287804878 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
19 |
9.3% |
0.092682927 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
8 |
3.9% |
0.039024390 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2 |
1.0% |
0.009756098 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
2.0% |
0.019512195 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004878049 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3167 |
|
NA |
w02_km202f
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of local
air pollution in the world immediately
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce local air pollution may be expensive, but
they will reduce the risk of experiencing dangerously polluted air in
the world immediately. To which extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on measures
that reduce the risk of local air pollution in the world immediately?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
26 |
12.0% |
0.11981567 |
| 2 |
Agree |
56 |
25.8% |
0.25806452 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
70 |
32.3% |
0.32258065 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
25 |
11.5% |
0.11520737 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
23 |
10.6% |
0.10599078 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
10 |
4.6% |
0.04608295 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3155 |
|
NA |
w02_km202g
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of local
air pollution in Norway in the next 50 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce local air pollution may be expensive, but
they will reduce the risk of experiencing dangerously polluted air in
Norway in 50 years. To which extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on measures
that reduce the risk of local air pollution in Norway in 50 years.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
51 |
25.6% |
0.25628141 |
| 2 |
Agree |
81 |
40.7% |
0.40703518 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
42 |
21.1% |
0.21105528 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
10 |
5.0% |
0.05025126 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
9 |
4.5% |
0.04522613 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
4 |
2.0% |
0.02010050 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
2 |
1.0% |
0.01005025 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3173 |
|
NA |
w02_km202h
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Use public funds on measures that reduce the risk of local
air pollution in the world in the next 50 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain measures to reduce local air pollution may be expensive, but
they will reduce the risk of experiencing dangerously polluted air in
the world in 50 years. To which extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: Norwegian public funds should be spent on measures
that reduce the risk of local air pollution in the world in 50 years?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
53 |
22.5% |
0.22457627 |
| 2 |
Agree |
85 |
36.0% |
0.36016949 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
52 |
22.0% |
0.22033898 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
23 |
9.7% |
0.09745763 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
11 |
4.7% |
0.04661017 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
7 |
3.0% |
0.02966102 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
2.1% |
0.02118644 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3136 |
|
NA |
w02_km2017
|
Variable label:
|
Will global warming lead to more harmful extreme weather over the next
100 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
If nothing is done to prevent it, do you believe global warming will
lead to more harmful extreme weather over the next 100 years, or do you
believe global warming will not lead to this?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Global warming will lead to more harmful extreme weather |
772 |
88.0% |
0.88027366 |
| 2 |
Global warming will not lead to more harmful extreme weather |
92 |
10.5% |
0.10490308 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.5% |
0.01482326 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km212
|
Variable label:
|
Decision not to carry out an impact assessment of petroleum activity
outside Lofoten and Vesterålen
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you may know, after the election the Solberg government decided that
it would not carry out an impact assessment of petroleum activity
outside Lofoten and Vesterålen in the next four years. In your opinion,
was this a good or bad decision?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
178 |
20.3% |
0.20296465 |
| 2 |
Good |
208 |
23.7% |
0.23717218 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
103 |
11.7% |
0.11744584 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
142 |
16.2% |
0.16191562 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
100 |
11.4% |
0.11402509 |
| 6 |
Bad |
89 |
10.1% |
0.10148233 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
45 |
5.1% |
0.05131129 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01368301 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_1
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: TV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
155 |
17.7% |
0.17673888 |
| 2 |
Important |
377 |
43.0% |
0.42987457 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
176 |
20.1% |
0.20068415 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
94 |
10.7% |
0.10718358 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
46 |
5.2% |
0.05245154 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
3.3% |
0.03306727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_2
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Radio
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Radio
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
78 |
8.9% |
0.08893957 |
| 2 |
Important |
241 |
27.5% |
0.27480046 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
227 |
25.9% |
0.25883694 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
175 |
20.0% |
0.19954390 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
92 |
10.5% |
0.10490308 |
| 97 |
No answer |
64 |
7.3% |
0.07297605 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_3
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: National newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
National newspapers (online and printed)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
132 |
15.1% |
0.15051311 |
| 2 |
Important |
358 |
40.8% |
0.40820981 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
203 |
23.1% |
0.23147092 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
85 |
9.7% |
0.09692132 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
53 |
6.0% |
0.06043330 |
| 97 |
No answer |
46 |
5.2% |
0.05245154 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_4
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Regional or local newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Regional or local newspapers (online and printed)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
44 |
5.0% |
0.05017104 |
| 2 |
Important |
165 |
18.8% |
0.18814139 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
204 |
23.3% |
0.23261117 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
256 |
29.2% |
0.29190422 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
136 |
15.5% |
0.15507412 |
| 97 |
No answer |
72 |
8.2% |
0.08209806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_5
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
36 |
4.1% |
0.04104903 |
| 2 |
Important |
69 |
7.9% |
0.07867731 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
123 |
14.0% |
0.14025086 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
245 |
27.9% |
0.27936146 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
332 |
37.9% |
0.37856328 |
| 97 |
No answer |
72 |
8.2% |
0.08209806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_6
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Blogs or other websites
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Blogs or other websites
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02052452 |
| 2 |
Important |
59 |
6.7% |
0.06727480 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
102 |
11.6% |
0.11630559 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
244 |
27.8% |
0.27822121 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
379 |
43.2% |
0.43215507 |
| 97 |
No answer |
75 |
8.6% |
0.08551881 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_7
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Publications from environmental
organizations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Publications from environmental organizations
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
45 |
5.1% |
0.05131129 |
| 2 |
Important |
177 |
20.2% |
0.20182440 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
241 |
27.5% |
0.27480046 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
176 |
20.1% |
0.20068415 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
173 |
19.7% |
0.19726340 |
| 97 |
No answer |
65 |
7.4% |
0.07411631 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_8
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Reports from the research
communities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reports from the research communities
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
197 |
22.5% |
0.22462942 |
| 2 |
Important |
300 |
34.2% |
0.34207526 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
179 |
20.4% |
0.20410490 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
86 |
9.8% |
0.09806157 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
65 |
7.4% |
0.07411631 |
| 97 |
No answer |
50 |
5.7% |
0.05701254 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_9
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Reports from the authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reports from the authorities
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
91 |
10.4% |
0.10376283 |
| 2 |
Important |
280 |
31.9% |
0.31927024 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
278 |
31.7% |
0.31698974 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
107 |
12.2% |
0.12200684 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
62 |
7.1% |
0.07069555 |
| 97 |
No answer |
59 |
6.7% |
0.06727480 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_10
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, please specify
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02166477 |
| 2 |
Important |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01368301 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
29 |
3.3% |
0.03306727 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
38 |
4.3% |
0.04332953 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
124 |
14.1% |
0.14139111 |
| 97 |
No answer |
655 |
74.7% |
0.74686431 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km201_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: Other [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, please specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km201a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Source of information on climate change: None
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following sources to you when you seek information
on global warming or climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
None
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
850 |
96.9% |
0.969213227 |
| 1 |
1 |
26 |
3.0% |
0.029646522 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001140251 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_v
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1 into two groups (U1-S1-V1 og U1-S1-V2) and
selects the following question in pairs: KM216 - KM219
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:876] [Invalid:2496]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
U1S1V1 |
436 |
49.8% |
0.4977169 |
| 2 |
U1S1V2 |
440 |
50.2% |
0.5022831 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2496 |
|
NA |
w02_km216
|
Variable label:
|
Temperature last winter
|
|
Literal question:
|
Has the winter (2013-14) where you live been warmer than normal, colder
than normal, or normal?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Colder |
5 |
1.1% |
0.011467890 |
| 2 |
Normal |
43 |
9.9% |
0.098623853 |
| 3 |
Warmer |
387 |
88.8% |
0.887614679 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002293578 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2936 |
|
NA |
w02_km217
|
Variable label:
|
Temperature last summer
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was the last summer (2013) where you live warmer than normal, colder
than normal, or normal?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Colder |
83 |
18.9% |
0.188636364 |
| 2 |
Normal |
230 |
52.3% |
0.522727273 |
| 3 |
Warmer |
126 |
28.6% |
0.286363636 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002272727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2932 |
|
NA |
w02_km218
|
Variable label:
|
Amount of precipitation last winter
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was there more precipitation, less precipitation or normal precipitation
last winter (2013-14) where you live?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
More precipitation |
191 |
43.8% |
0.43807339 |
| 2 |
Normal precipitation |
108 |
24.8% |
0.24770642 |
| 3 |
Less precipitation |
129 |
29.6% |
0.29587156 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.8% |
0.01834862 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2936 |
|
NA |
w02_km219
|
Variable label:
|
Amount of precipitation last summer [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
When you consider last summer (2013), was there more precipitation, less
precipitation or normal precipitation where you live?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
More precipitation |
123 |
28.0% |
0.279545455 |
| 2 |
Normal precipitation |
204 |
46.4% |
0.463636364 |
| 3 |
Less precipitation |
109 |
24.8% |
0.247727273 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009090909 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2932 |
|
NA |
w02_km220
|
Variable label:
|
Average temperature the past ten years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that the temperature on average has become warmer, colder
or remained about the same in the past ten years?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Warmer |
471 |
53.7% |
0.53705815 |
| 2 |
About the same |
352 |
40.1% |
0.40136830 |
| 3 |
Colder |
39 |
4.4% |
0.04446978 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.7% |
0.01710376 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km221
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: I have myself noticed the consequences of global warming
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree with the statement: “I have myself noticed
the consequences of global warming”
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
47 |
5.4% |
0.053591790 |
| 2 |
Agree |
148 |
16.9% |
0.168757127 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
295 |
33.6% |
0.336374002 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
188 |
21.4% |
0.214367161 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
54 |
6.2% |
0.061573546 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
92 |
10.5% |
0.104903079 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
5.6% |
0.055872292 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004561003 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1 into four groups and selects one of the
following questions: KM2236 - KM2239
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:875] [Invalid:2497]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
209 |
23.9% |
0.2388571 |
| 2 |
2 |
214 |
24.5% |
0.2445714 |
| 3 |
3 |
217 |
24.8% |
0.2480000 |
| 4 |
4 |
235 |
26.9% |
0.2685714 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2497 |
|
NA |
w02_km2236
|
Variable label:
|
Cause of climate change, conversation with someone who does not believe
it is man-made [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of late there has been quite a lot of discussion on climate change. Some
are of the opinion that climate changes are not man-made. Others believe
that human actions cause the climate to change. We ask you to imagine
that you are speaking with some people who do not believe that humans
are responsible for climate change. Imagine that you asked each one of
them why they do not believe that humans cause climate changes. What do
you think they would tell you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please be brief and focus on how you believe they would answer your
question.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km2237
|
Variable label:
|
Cause of climate change, conversation with someone who does believe it
is man-made [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of late there has been quite a lot of discussion on climate change. Some
are of the opinion that climate changes are not man-made. Others believe
that human actions cause the climate to change. We ask you to imagine
that you are speaking with some people who believe that humans are
responsible for climate change. Imagine that you asked each one of them
why they believe that humans cause climate changes. What do you think
they would tell you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please be brief and focus on how you believe they would answer your
question.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km2238
|
Variable label:
|
Cause of climate change, conversation with someone who does believe the
climate is about to change [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of late there has been quite a lot of discussion on climate change. Some
believe that the climate is changing. Others believe that the climate is
not changing.
We ask you to imagine that you are speaking with some people who believe
that the climate is changing. Imagine that you asked each one of them
why they believe that the climate is changing. What do you think they
would tell you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please be brief and focus on how you believe they would answer your
question.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km2239
|
Variable label:
|
Cause of climate change, conversation with someone who does not believe
the climate is about to change [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Of late there has been quite a lot of discussion on climate change. Some
believe that the climate is changing. Others believe that the climate is
not changing.
We ask you to imagine that you are speaking with some people who do not
believe that the climate is changing. Imagine that you asked each one of
them why they do not believe that the climate is changing. What do you
think they would tell you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please be brief and focus on how you believe they would answer your
question.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km251
|
Variable label:
|
If the Progress Party supports measures that increase the costs of
emitting greenhouse gases
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, does the Progress Party support measures that increase
the costs of emitting greenhouse gases in Norway?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
242 |
27.6% |
0.27594071 |
| 2 |
No |
551 |
62.8% |
0.62827822 |
| 97 |
No answer |
84 |
9.6% |
0.09578107 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km252
|
Variable label:
|
Heard of the CO2 compensation scheme for Norwegian industry
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard of the CO2 compensation scheme for Norwegian industry?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
423 |
48.2% |
0.48232611 |
| 2 |
No |
424 |
48.3% |
0.48346636 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
3.4% |
0.03420753 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_km253
|
Variable label:
|
Supports the CO2 compensation scheme
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you support the CO2 compensation scheme?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
125 |
29.6% |
0.295508274 |
| 2 |
No |
66 |
15.6% |
0.156028369 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.7% |
0.007092199 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2949 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
229 |
54.1% |
0.541371158 |
w02_u1_kommvalg
|
Variable label:
|
A value of 1 for respondents who are registered in one of the following
municipalities: Oslo, Ski, Nesodden, Oppegård, Enebakk, Bærum, Rælingen,
Lørenskog, Skedsmo, Nittedal, Marker, Rømskog, Trøgstad, Spydeberg,
Askim, Eidsberg, Skiptvet, Hobøl, Vestby, Ås, Frogn, Asker, Røyken,
Hurum, Aurskog-Høland, Sørum, Fet, Gjerdrum, Ullensaker, Nes, Eidsvoll,
Nannestad, Hurdal, Lunner, Moss, Råde, Rygge, Våler, Drammen, Øvre
Eiker, Nedre Eiker, Lier, Holmestrand, Svelvik, Sande, Hof, Sandnes,
Stavanger, Hå, Klepp, Time, Gjesdal, Sola, Randaberg, Forsand, Strand,
Finnøy, Rennesøy, Kvitsøy, Bergen, Fusa, Samnanger, Os, Sund, Fjell,
Askøy, Vaksdal, Osterøy, Meland, Øygarden, Radøy, Lindås, Austrheim
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3370] [Invalid:2] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
2472 |
73.4% |
0.7335312 |
| 1 |
1 |
898 |
26.6% |
0.2664688 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2 |
|
NA |
w02_dt201
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion of funding public facilities with aid of advertising [if
w02_u1_kommvalg]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Several Norwegian municipalities have in recent years entered into
contracts with companies that provide and maintain bus shelters, city
bicycles and public lavatories in return for the companies being allowed
to advertise in connection with these. What is your opinion of this?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am opposed to the municipality funding bus shelters, city bicycles and public
lavatories with the aid of advertising |
227 |
25.3% |
0.25278396 |
| 2 |
I support the municipality in funding bus shelters, city bicycles and public
lavatories with the aid of advertising |
648 |
72.2% |
0.72160356 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
2.6% |
0.02561247 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2474 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and w01_DT14 has a value. Randomized into two groups
and selects one of the following questions: DT203Aa/DT203Ab
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:845] [Invalid:2527]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
423 |
50.1% |
0.5005917 |
| 2 |
2 |
422 |
49.9% |
0.4994083 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2527 |
|
NA |
w02_dt203aa
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that: NOK 5,000 will be drawn as a travel gift card to the
participants in the Citizen Panel
|
|
Literal question:
|
It has now been decided that NOK 5,000 will be drawn as a travel gift
card to the participants in the Citizen Panel. To which degree do you
feel this decision is acceptable?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
40 |
9.5% |
0.094562648 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
78 |
18.4% |
0.184397163 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
122 |
28.8% |
0.288416076 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
113 |
26.7% |
0.267139480 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
68 |
16.1% |
0.160756501 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004728132 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2949 |
|
NA |
w02_dt203ab
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that: NOK 5,000 will be awarded to Doctors without borders
|
|
Literal question:
|
It has now been decided that NOK 5,000 will be awarded to Doctors
without borders. To which degree do you feel this decision is
acceptable?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
282 |
66.8% |
0.668246445 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
104 |
24.6% |
0.246445498 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
19 |
4.5% |
0.045023697 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
8 |
1.9% |
0.018957346 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
8 |
1.9% |
0.018957346 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002369668 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and w01_DT15 has a value. Randomized into two groups
and selects one of the following questions: DT203Ba/DT203Bb
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:825] [Invalid:2547]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
409 |
49.6% |
0.4957576 |
| 2 |
2 |
416 |
50.4% |
0.5042424 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_dt203ba
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that: NOK 5,000 will be drawn as a travel gift card to the
participants in the Citizen Panel
|
|
Literal question:
|
It has now been decided that NOK 5,000 will be drawn as a travel gift
card to the participants in the Citizen Panel. To which degree do you
feel this decision is acceptable?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
26 |
6.4% |
0.063569682 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
67 |
16.4% |
0.163814181 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
116 |
28.4% |
0.283618582 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
109 |
26.7% |
0.266503667 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
87 |
21.3% |
0.212713936 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.0% |
0.009779951 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2963 |
|
NA |
w02_dt203bb
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that: NOK 5,000 will be awarded to Doctors without borders
|
|
Literal question:
|
It has now been decided that NOK 5,000 will be awarded to Doctors
without borders. To which degree do you feel this decision is
acceptable?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
285 |
68.5% |
0.685096154 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
92 |
22.1% |
0.221153846 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
27 |
6.5% |
0.064903846 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
8 |
1.9% |
0.019230769 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
3 |
0.7% |
0.007211538 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002403846 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2956 |
|
NA |
w02_ocgb9
|
Variable label:
|
Duty or choice to vote
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some vote mainly based on duty. They believe that one should use one’s
vote, even though one doesn’t agree with any of the parties. Others
believe that one can freely choose not to vote if one cannot find a
party one agrees with. What is your opinion about voting, is it
primarily:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A duty |
457 |
52.1% |
0.52109464 |
| 2 |
A choice |
411 |
46.9% |
0.46864310 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.0% |
0.01026226 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_ocgb10
|
Variable label:
|
To which extent is it a duty to vote
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you believe it is a duty?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a great degree |
325 |
71.1% |
0.71115974 |
| 2 |
To some degree |
124 |
27.1% |
0.27133479 |
| 3 |
To a small degree |
8 |
1.8% |
0.01750547 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2915 |
|
NA |
w02_ocgb8_1
|
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of voting at the next election to the Storting
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the likelihood of you voting at the next election to the
Storting? Indicate the likelihood using the scale below.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - I most certainly will not vote |
25 |
2.9% |
0.028506271 |
| 2 |
1 |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004561003 |
| 3 |
2 |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004561003 |
| 4 |
3 |
3 |
0.3% |
0.003420753 |
| 5 |
4 |
7 |
0.8% |
0.007981756 |
| 6 |
5 |
15 |
1.7% |
0.017103763 |
| 7 |
6 |
8 |
0.9% |
0.009122007 |
| 8 |
7 |
12 |
1.4% |
0.013683010 |
| 9 |
8 |
36 |
4.1% |
0.041049031 |
| 10 |
9 |
77 |
8.8% |
0.087799316 |
| 11 |
10 - I most certainly will vote |
676 |
77.1% |
0.770809578 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.1% |
0.011402509 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1 into four groups and selects one of the
following questions: OCACM1 - OCACM4
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:871] [Invalid:2501]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
216 |
24.8% |
0.2479908 |
| 2 |
2 |
223 |
25.6% |
0.2560276 |
| 3 |
3 |
221 |
25.4% |
0.2537313 |
| 4 |
4 |
211 |
24.2% |
0.2422503 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2501 |
|
NA |
w02_ocacm1
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with NAV services
|
|
Literal question:
|
We want to know how you rate the services of Nav (Labour and welfare
administration). All in all, how satisfied are you with the quality of
the services?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very dissatisfied |
17 |
7.9% |
0.07870370 |
| 2 |
Dissatisfied |
22 |
10.2% |
0.10185185 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
40 |
18.5% |
0.18518519 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
37 |
17.1% |
0.17129630 |
| 5 |
Somewhat satisfied |
28 |
13.0% |
0.12962963 |
| 6 |
Satisfied |
28 |
13.0% |
0.12962963 |
| 7 |
Very satisfied |
7 |
3.2% |
0.03240741 |
| 8 |
Not applicable |
34 |
15.7% |
0.15740741 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01388889 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3156 |
|
NA |
w02_ocacm2
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with NAV services, given Aftenposten article
|
|
Literal question:
|
Aftenposten wrote the following: “Last year, users brought 5,114
complaints against Nav. A third complain about the employees’ conduct,
while more than half are dissatisfied with follow-up” (3. September
2013). We want to know how you rate the services of Nav (Labour and
welfare administration). All in all, how satisfied are you with the
quality of the services?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very dissatisfied |
8 |
3.6% |
0.03587444 |
| 2 |
Dissatisfied |
29 |
13.0% |
0.13004484 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
40 |
17.9% |
0.17937220 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
82 |
36.8% |
0.36771300 |
| 5 |
Somewhat satisfied |
15 |
6.7% |
0.06726457 |
| 6 |
Satisfied |
38 |
17.0% |
0.17040359 |
| 7 |
Very satisfied |
4 |
1.8% |
0.01793722 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.1% |
0.03139013 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3149 |
|
NA |
w02_ocacm3
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with NAV services, given Dagbladet article
|
|
Literal question:
|
Dagbladet wrote the following: “Last year, users brought 5,114
complaints against Nav. A third complain about the employees’ conduct,
while more than half are dissatisfied with follow-up” (3. September
2013). We want to know how you rate the services of Nav (Labour and
welfare administration). All in all, how satisfied are you with the
quality of the services?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very dissatisfied |
19 |
8.6% |
0.085972851 |
| 2 |
Dissatisfied |
31 |
14.0% |
0.140271493 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
33 |
14.9% |
0.149321267 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
77 |
34.8% |
0.348416290 |
| 5 |
Somewhat satisfied |
18 |
8.1% |
0.081447964 |
| 6 |
Satisfied |
32 |
14.5% |
0.144796380 |
| 7 |
Very satisfied |
9 |
4.1% |
0.040723982 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.9% |
0.009049774 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3151 |
|
NA |
w02_ocacm4
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with NAV services, given thousands of complaints
|
|
Literal question:
|
Last year, users brought 5,114 complaints against Nav. A third complain
about the employees’ conduct, while more than half are dissatisfied with
follow-up. We want to know how you rate the services of Nav (Labour and
welfare administration). All in all, how satisfied are you with the
quality of the services?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very dissatisfied |
16 |
7.6% |
0.07582938 |
| 2 |
Dissatisfied |
10 |
4.7% |
0.04739336 |
| 3 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
32 |
15.2% |
0.15165877 |
| 4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
89 |
42.2% |
0.42180095 |
| 5 |
Somewhat satisfied |
21 |
10.0% |
0.09952607 |
| 6 |
Satisfied |
30 |
14.2% |
0.14218009 |
| 7 |
Very satisfied |
5 |
2.4% |
0.02369668 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
3.8% |
0.03791469 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3161 |
|
NA |
w02_ocacm5
|
Variable label:
|
Experience/contact with Nav in the past 12 months
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which experience/contact have you had with Nav in the past 12 months?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No experience/not had contact |
467 |
53.7% |
0.5373993 |
| 2 |
Personal experience with Nav |
201 |
23.1% |
0.2313003 |
| 3 |
Experience as next of kin/guardian |
97 |
11.2% |
0.1116226 |
| 4 |
Experience as employee/via work |
104 |
12.0% |
0.1196778 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2503 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_ran4
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1 into three groups and selects one of the
following questions: TA1a-TA3a
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:871] [Invalid:2501]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
279 |
32.0% |
0.3203215 |
| 2 |
2 |
294 |
33.8% |
0.3375431 |
| 3 |
3 |
298 |
34.2% |
0.3421355 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2501 |
|
NA |
w02_ta1a
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of news item with picture [see screenshot provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
On the next three pages, you will be presented with a number of
different news stories. Select the story you want to read the most.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Constitutional anniversary sparks debate |
123 |
44.1% |
0.44086022 |
| 2 |
Offers to fix matches not uncommon |
68 |
24.4% |
0.24372760 |
| 3 |
Demand a vote |
47 |
16.8% |
0.16845878 |
| 4 |
Boycotting joint training sessions |
16 |
5.7% |
0.05734767 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
9.0% |
0.08960573 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3093 |
|
NA |
w02_ta2a
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of news item with picture [see screenshot provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
On the next three pages, you will be presented with a number of
different news stories. Select the story you want to read the most.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party and the Socialist Left Party lose ground in new poll |
66 |
22.4% |
0.22448980 |
| 2 |
Offers to fix matches not uncommon |
26 |
8.8% |
0.08843537 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party promotes social dumping |
151 |
51.4% |
0.51360544 |
| 4 |
Boycotting joint training sessions |
33 |
11.2% |
0.11224490 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
6.1% |
0.06122449 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3078 |
|
NA |
w02_ta3a
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of news item with picture [see screenshot provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
On the next three pages, you will be presented with a number of
different news stories. Select the story you want to read the most.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Conservative Party promotes social dumping |
160 |
53.7% |
0.53691275 |
| 2 |
Offers to fix matches not uncommon |
28 |
9.4% |
0.09395973 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party and the Socialist Left Party lose ground in new poll |
63 |
21.1% |
0.21140940 |
| 4 |
Boycotting joint training sessions |
23 |
7.7% |
0.07718121 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
8.1% |
0.08053691 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3074 |
|
NA |
w02_ta1b
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of news item with picture [see screenshot provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
On the next three pages, you will be presented with a number of
different news stories. Select the story you want to read the most.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health most important |
135 |
48.4% |
0.48387097 |
| 2 |
Psychological warfare |
24 |
8.6% |
0.08602151 |
| 3 |
Refute the nursing home myths |
81 |
29.0% |
0.29032258 |
| 4 |
More fall into the dating trap |
21 |
7.5% |
0.07526882 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
6.5% |
0.06451613 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3093 |
|
NA |
w02_ta2b
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of news item with picture [see screenshot provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
On the next three pages, you will be presented with a number of
different news stories. Select the story you want to read the most.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise |
68 |
23.1% |
0.23129252 |
| 2 |
Psychological warfare |
28 |
9.5% |
0.09523810 |
| 3 |
Red-green government gave children a better school day |
143 |
48.6% |
0.48639456 |
| 4 |
More fall into the dating trap |
32 |
10.9% |
0.10884354 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
7.8% |
0.07823129 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3078 |
|
NA |
w02_ta3b
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of news item with picture [see screenshot provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
On the next three pages, you will be presented with a number of
different news stories. Select the story you want to read the most.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Red-green government gave children a better school day |
134 |
45.0% |
0.44966443 |
| 2 |
Psychological warfare |
29 |
9.7% |
0.09731544 |
| 3 |
Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise |
84 |
28.2% |
0.28187919 |
| 4 |
More fall into the dating trap |
35 |
11.7% |
0.11744966 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
5.4% |
0.05369128 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3074 |
|
NA |
w02_ta1c
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of news item with picture [see screenshot provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
On the next three pages, you will be presented with a number of
different news stories. Select the story you want to read the most.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Storting demands clearer rules |
51 |
18.3% |
0.18279570 |
| 2 |
Feel unjustly treated |
36 |
12.9% |
0.12903226 |
| 3 |
Political financial crisis chaos |
144 |
51.6% |
0.51612903 |
| 4 |
Bride in fight at own wedding |
26 |
9.3% |
0.09318996 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
7.9% |
0.07885305 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3093 |
|
NA |
w02_ta2c
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of news item with picture [see screenshot provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
On the next three pages, you will be presented with a number of
different news stories. Select the story you want to read the most.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Solberg (H) less popular in new poll |
69 |
23.5% |
0.23469388 |
| 2 |
Feel unjustly treated |
32 |
10.9% |
0.10884354 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party and the Progress Party reduce the employer's contribution |
139 |
47.3% |
0.47278912 |
| 4 |
Bride in fight at own wedding |
30 |
10.2% |
0.10204082 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
8.2% |
0.08163265 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3078 |
|
NA |
w02_ta3c
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of news item with picture [see screenshot provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
On the next three pages, you will be presented with a number of
different news stories. Select the story you want to read the most.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Conservative Party and the Progress Party reduce the employer's contribution |
144 |
48.3% |
0.4832215 |
| 2 |
Feel unjustly treated |
33 |
11.1% |
0.1107383 |
| 3 |
Solberg (H) less popular in new poll |
69 |
23.2% |
0.2315436 |
| 4 |
Bride in fight at own wedding |
31 |
10.4% |
0.1040268 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
7.0% |
0.0704698 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3074 |
|
NA |
w02_tadv1
|
Variable label:
|
Time spent watching, NRK-TV
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much time do you spend watching NRK TV on any given day?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rarely or never watch |
130 |
14.8% |
0.148232611 |
| 2 |
Less than 30 minutes |
147 |
16.8% |
0.167616876 |
| 3 |
30 to 60 minutes |
239 |
27.3% |
0.272519954 |
| 4 |
1 to 2 hours |
230 |
26.2% |
0.262257697 |
| 5 |
2 to 3 hours |
89 |
10.1% |
0.101482326 |
| 6 |
3 to 4 hours |
16 |
1.8% |
0.018244014 |
| 7 |
More than 4 hours |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005701254 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.4% |
0.023945268 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_tadv2
|
Variable label:
|
Time spent watching, TV 2
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much time do you spend watching TV2 on any given day?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rarely or never watch |
165 |
18.8% |
0.188141391 |
| 2 |
Less than 30 minutes |
231 |
26.3% |
0.263397948 |
| 3 |
30 to 60 minutes |
229 |
26.1% |
0.261117446 |
| 4 |
1 to 2 hours |
146 |
16.6% |
0.166476625 |
| 5 |
2 to 3 hours |
42 |
4.8% |
0.047890536 |
| 6 |
3 to 4 hours |
6 |
0.7% |
0.006841505 |
| 7 |
More than 4 hours |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004561003 |
| 97 |
No answer |
54 |
6.2% |
0.061573546 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_tadv3
|
Variable label:
|
Time spent watching, nyhetssendinger på NRK-TV
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much time do you spend watching news broadcasts on NRK TV on any
given day?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rarely or never watch |
144 |
16.4% |
0.16419612 |
| 2 |
Less than 30 minutes |
104 |
11.9% |
0.11858609 |
| 3 |
30 to 60 minutes |
151 |
17.2% |
0.17217788 |
| 4 |
1 to 2 hours |
185 |
21.1% |
0.21094641 |
| 5 |
2 to 3 hours |
156 |
17.8% |
0.17787913 |
| 6 |
3 to 4 hours |
84 |
9.6% |
0.09578107 |
| 7 |
More than 4 hours |
28 |
3.2% |
0.03192702 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
2.9% |
0.02850627 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_tadv4
|
Variable label:
|
Time spent watching, nyhetssendinger på TV2
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much time do you spend watching news broadcasts on TV2 on any given
day?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rarely or never watch |
219 |
25.0% |
0.24971494 |
| 2 |
Less than 30 minutes |
172 |
19.6% |
0.19612315 |
| 3 |
30 to 60 minutes |
174 |
19.8% |
0.19840365 |
| 4 |
1 to 2 hours |
168 |
19.2% |
0.19156214 |
| 5 |
2 to 3 hours |
73 |
8.3% |
0.08323831 |
| 6 |
3 to 4 hours |
29 |
3.3% |
0.03306727 |
| 7 |
More than 4 hours |
9 |
1.0% |
0.01026226 |
| 97 |
No answer |
33 |
3.8% |
0.03762828 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_tadv5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in NRK-TV’s news coverage: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe NRK TV favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
341 |
38.9% |
0.38882554 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02166477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
517 |
59.0% |
0.58950969 |
w02_tadv5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in NRK-TV’s news coverage: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe NRK TV favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Progress Party |
89 |
10.1% |
0.10148233 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02166477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
769 |
87.7% |
0.87685291 |
w02_tadv5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in NRK-TV’s news coverage: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe NRK TV favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Conservative Party |
119 |
13.6% |
0.13568985 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02166477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
739 |
84.3% |
0.84264538 |
w02_tadv5_4
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in NRK-TV’s news coverage: The Christian Democratic
Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe NRK TV favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
25 |
2.9% |
0.02850627 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02166477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
833 |
95.0% |
0.94982896 |
w02_tadv5_5
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in NRK-TV’s news coverage: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe NRK TV favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Green Party |
24 |
2.7% |
0.02736602 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02166477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
834 |
95.1% |
0.95096921 |
w02_tadv5_6
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in NRK-TV’s news coverage: Red
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe NRK TV favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Red
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Red |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005701254 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.2% |
0.021664766 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
853 |
97.3% |
0.972633979 |
w02_tadv5_7
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in NRK-TV’s news coverage: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe NRK TV favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Centre Party |
33 |
3.8% |
0.03762828 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02166477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
825 |
94.1% |
0.94070696 |
w02_tadv5_8
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in NRK-TV’s news coverage: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe NRK TV favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Socialist Left Party |
112 |
12.8% |
0.12770810 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02166477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
746 |
85.1% |
0.85062714 |
w02_tadv5_9
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in NRK-TV’s news coverage: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe NRK TV favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Liberal Party |
13 |
1.5% |
0.01482326 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02166477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
845 |
96.4% |
0.96351197 |
w02_tadv5_10
|
Variable label:
|
No political favoritism in NRK-TV’s news coverage
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe NRK TV favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
NRK TV doesn’t favour any parties
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK TV doesn't favour any parties |
380 |
43.3% |
0.43329532 |
| 97 |
Ikke svart |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02166477 |
| 98 |
Ikke spurt |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
478 |
54.5% |
0.54503991 |
w02_tadv6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in TV2’s news coverage: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe TV2 favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
148 |
16.9% |
0.16875713 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.4% |
0.02394527 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
708 |
80.7% |
0.80729761 |
w02_tadv6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in TV2’s news coverage: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe TV2 favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Progress Party |
124 |
14.1% |
0.14139111 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.4% |
0.02394527 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
732 |
83.5% |
0.83466363 |
w02_tadv6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in TV2’s news coverage: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe TV2 favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Conservative Party |
163 |
18.6% |
0.18586089 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.4% |
0.02394527 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
693 |
79.0% |
0.79019384 |
w02_tadv6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in TV2’s news coverage: The Christian Democratic
Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe TV2 favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
20 |
2.3% |
0.02280502 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.4% |
0.02394527 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
836 |
95.3% |
0.95324971 |
w02_tadv6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in TV2’s news coverage: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe TV2 favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Green Party |
8 |
0.9% |
0.009122007 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.4% |
0.023945268 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
848 |
96.7% |
0.966932725 |
w02_tadv6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in TV2’s news coverage: Red
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe TV2 favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Red
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Red |
3 |
0.3% |
0.003420753 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.4% |
0.023945268 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
853 |
97.3% |
0.972633979 |
w02_tadv6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in TV2’s news coverage: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe TV2 favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Centre Party |
24 |
2.7% |
0.02736602 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.4% |
0.02394527 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
832 |
94.9% |
0.94868871 |
w02_tadv6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in TV2’s news coverage: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe TV2 favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Socialist Left Party |
40 |
4.6% |
0.04561003 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.4% |
0.02394527 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
816 |
93.0% |
0.93044470 |
w02_tadv6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Political favoritism in TV2’s news coverage: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe TV2 favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Liberal Party |
13 |
1.5% |
0.01482326 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.4% |
0.02394527 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
843 |
96.1% |
0.96123147 |
w02_tadv6_10
|
Variable label:
|
No political favoritism in TV2’s news coverage
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are there any political parties you believe TV2 favours in its news
coverage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV2 doesn’t favour any parties
|
|
Technical description:
|
YOU MAY SELECT UP TO 3 PARTIES
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
TV2 doesn't favour any parties |
418 |
47.7% |
0.47662486 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.4% |
0.02394527 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
438 |
49.9% |
0.49942987 |
w02_u1_s1_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1 into seven groups and selects one of the
following questions: OCGB1 - OCGB6 + control group
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:856] [Invalid:2516]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
135 |
15.8% |
0.1577103 |
| 2 |
2 |
122 |
14.3% |
0.1425234 |
| 3 |
3 |
119 |
13.9% |
0.1390187 |
| 4 |
4 |
116 |
13.6% |
0.1355140 |
| 5 |
5 |
127 |
14.8% |
0.1483645 |
| 6 |
6 |
129 |
15.1% |
0.1507009 |
| 7 |
7 |
108 |
12.6% |
0.1261682 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2516 |
|
NA |
w02_ocgb1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: By not voting at elections, this woman (pictured) has been a
poor role model for her children [see screenshot provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
By not voting at elections, this woman has been a poor role model for
her children.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
15 |
11.1% |
0.11111111 |
| 2 |
Agree |
31 |
23.0% |
0.22962963 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
25 |
18.5% |
0.18518519 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
35 |
25.9% |
0.25925926 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
8 |
5.9% |
0.05925926 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
12 |
8.9% |
0.08888889 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3237 |
|
NA |
w02_ocgb2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: By voting at elections, this woman (pictured)has taught her
children what is the right thing to do
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
By voting at elections, this woman has taught her children what is the
right thing to do.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
20 |
16.4% |
0.163934426 |
| 2 |
Agree |
31 |
25.4% |
0.254098361 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
19 |
15.6% |
0.155737705 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
35 |
28.7% |
0.286885246 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
6 |
4.9% |
0.049180328 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
7 |
5.7% |
0.057377049 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
2.5% |
0.024590164 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008196721 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3250 |
|
NA |
w02_ocgb3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: By not voting at elections, this woman (pictured) has shown
her neighbours that she doesn’t care about the local community [see
screenshot provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
By not voting at elections, this woman has shown her neighbours that she
doesn’t care about the local community.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
10 |
8.4% |
0.08403361 |
| 2 |
Agree |
15 |
12.6% |
0.12605042 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
27 |
22.7% |
0.22689076 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
25 |
21.0% |
0.21008403 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
10 |
8.4% |
0.08403361 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
21 |
17.6% |
0.17647059 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
11 |
9.2% |
0.09243697 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3253 |
|
NA |
w02_ocgb4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: By voting at elections, this woman (pictured) has shown her
neighbours that she cares about the local community.[see screenshot
provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
By voting at elections, this woman has shown her neighbours that she
cares about the local community.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
13 |
11.2% |
0.11206897 |
| 2 |
Agree |
31 |
26.7% |
0.26724138 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
21 |
18.1% |
0.18103448 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
37 |
31.9% |
0.31896552 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1 |
0.9% |
0.00862069 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
6 |
5.2% |
0.05172414 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.6% |
0.02586207 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3256 |
|
NA |
w02_ocgb5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: By not voting at elections, this woman (pictured) has shown
that she doesn’t care about her country [see screenshot provided in
codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
By not voting at elections, this woman has shown that she doesn’t care
about her country.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
7 |
5.5% |
0.05511811 |
| 2 |
Agree |
18 |
14.2% |
0.14173228 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
29 |
22.8% |
0.22834646 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
32 |
25.2% |
0.25196850 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
8 |
6.3% |
0.06299213 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
25 |
19.7% |
0.19685039 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
6.3% |
0.06299213 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3245 |
|
NA |
w02_ocgb6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: By voting at elections, this woman (pictured) has shown that
she cares about her country [see screenshot provided in codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
By voting at elections, this woman has shown that she cares about her
country.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
28 |
21.7% |
0.217054264 |
| 2 |
Agree |
41 |
31.8% |
0.317829457 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
28 |
21.7% |
0.217054264 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
19 |
14.7% |
0.147286822 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
6 |
4.7% |
0.046511628 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1 |
0.8% |
0.007751938 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
3.1% |
0.031007752 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.6% |
0.015503876 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3243 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_ran5
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1 into two groups and selects one of the
following questions: DV29a/DV29b
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:856] [Invalid:2516]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
439 |
51.3% |
0.5128505 |
| 2 |
2 |
417 |
48.7% |
0.4871495 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2516 |
|
NA |
w02_dv29a
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: School books should be written such that the reflect the new
diversity in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
School books should be written such that the reflect the new diversity
in Norway.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
62 |
14.1% |
0.141230068 |
| 2 |
Agree |
135 |
30.8% |
0.307517084 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
115 |
26.2% |
0.261958998 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
37 |
8.4% |
0.084282460 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
34 |
7.7% |
0.077448747 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
29 |
6.6% |
0.066059226 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
24 |
5.5% |
0.054669704 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.7% |
0.006833713 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2933 |
|
NA |
w02_dv29b
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: School books should be rewritten such that the reflect the
new diversity in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
School books should be rewritten such that the reflect the new diversity
in Norway.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
30 |
7.2% |
0.07194245 |
| 2 |
Agree |
94 |
22.5% |
0.22541966 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
104 |
24.9% |
0.24940048 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
69 |
16.5% |
0.16546763 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
40 |
9.6% |
0.09592326 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
45 |
10.8% |
0.10791367 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
30 |
7.2% |
0.07194245 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.2% |
0.01199041 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2955 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_ran6
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1 into two groups and selects one of the
following questions: DV210a/DV210b
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:856] [Invalid:2516]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
436 |
50.9% |
0.5093458 |
| 2 |
2 |
420 |
49.1% |
0.4906542 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2516 |
|
NA |
w02_dv210a
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is important to recognize the new diversity in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is important to recognize the new diversity in Norway.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
54 |
12.4% |
0.12385321 |
| 2 |
Agree |
162 |
37.2% |
0.37155963 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
108 |
24.8% |
0.24770642 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
46 |
10.6% |
0.10550459 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
29 |
6.7% |
0.06651376 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
19 |
4.4% |
0.04357798 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
13 |
3.0% |
0.02981651 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.1% |
0.01146789 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2936 |
|
NA |
w02_dv210b
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is important to celebrate the new diversity in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is important to celebrate the new diversity in Norway.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
18 |
4.3% |
0.04285714 |
| 2 |
Agree |
65 |
15.5% |
0.15476190 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
87 |
20.7% |
0.20714286 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
95 |
22.6% |
0.22619048 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
53 |
12.6% |
0.12619048 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
61 |
14.5% |
0.14523810 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
34 |
8.1% |
0.08095238 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2952 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_ran7
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1 into three groups and selects one of the
following questions: OCSN1 - OCSN3
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:856] [Invalid:2516]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
299 |
34.9% |
0.3492991 |
| 2 |
2 |
274 |
32.0% |
0.3200935 |
| 3 |
3 |
283 |
33.1% |
0.3306075 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2516 |
|
NA |
w02_ocsn1
|
Variable label:
|
Out of 100 people who live in Norway, how many were not born in this
country
|
|
Literal question:
|
Out of 100 people who live in Norway, how many do you think were not
born in this country?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0-9 |
92 |
30.8% |
0.30769231 |
| 2 |
10-19 |
123 |
41.1% |
0.41137124 |
| 3 |
20-29 |
37 |
12.4% |
0.12374582 |
| 4 |
30-39 |
14 |
4.7% |
0.04682274 |
| 5 |
40-49 |
9 |
3.0% |
0.03010033 |
| 6 |
50 or more |
20 |
6.7% |
0.06688963 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01337793 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3073 |
|
NA |
w02_ocsn2
|
Variable label:
|
Out of 100 people who live in Norway, how many are divorced
|
|
Literal question:
|
Out of 100 people who live in Norway, how many do you think are
divorced?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0-9 |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03284672 |
| 2 |
10-19 |
47 |
17.2% |
0.17153285 |
| 3 |
20-29 |
52 |
19.0% |
0.18978102 |
| 4 |
30-39 |
74 |
27.0% |
0.27007299 |
| 5 |
40-49 |
62 |
22.6% |
0.22627737 |
| 6 |
50 or more |
30 |
10.9% |
0.10948905 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3098 |
|
NA |
w02_ocsn3
|
Variable label:
|
Were you aware that 12 out of 100 people who live in Norway were not
born in this country?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Were you aware that 12 out of 100 people who live in Norway were not
born in this country?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
97 |
34.3% |
0.342756184 |
| 2 |
No |
185 |
65.4% |
0.653710247 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003533569 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3089 |
|
NA |
w02_ocsn4
|
Variable label:
|
If the government should implement measures to reduce differences in
income levels
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree that the government should
implement measures to reduce differences in income levels?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
125 |
14.3% |
0.14253136 |
| 2 |
Agree |
201 |
22.9% |
0.22919042 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
270 |
30.8% |
0.30786773 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
89 |
10.1% |
0.10148233 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
67 |
7.6% |
0.07639681 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
68 |
7.8% |
0.07753706 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
27 |
3.1% |
0.03078677 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
3.4% |
0.03420753 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2495 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_v1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=1 into two new U1-S1-V1 and U1-S1-V2 groups
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:854] [Invalid:2518]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
446 |
52.2% |
0.5222482 |
| 2 |
2 |
408 |
47.8% |
0.4777518 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2518 |
|
NA |
w02_ocam2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: Norwegians
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. For each group, please indicate how
much you like or dislike it:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegians
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly like |
99 |
22.2% |
0.22197309 |
| 2 |
Significantly like |
177 |
39.7% |
0.39686099 |
| 3 |
Somewhat like |
25 |
5.6% |
0.05605381 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
130 |
29.1% |
0.29147982 |
| 5 |
Misliker noe |
4 |
0.9% |
0.00896861 |
| 6 |
Somewhat dislike |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 7 |
Strongly dislike |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.5% |
0.02466368 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2926 |
|
NA |
w02_ocam2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: Swedes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. For each group, please indicate how
much you like or dislike it:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Swedes
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly like |
64 |
14.3% |
0.143497758 |
| 2 |
Significantly like |
177 |
39.7% |
0.396860987 |
| 3 |
Somewhat like |
38 |
8.5% |
0.085201794 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
144 |
32.3% |
0.322869955 |
| 5 |
Misliker noe |
7 |
1.6% |
0.015695067 |
| 6 |
Somewhat dislike |
3 |
0.7% |
0.006726457 |
| 7 |
Strongly dislike |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
2.9% |
0.029147982 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2926 |
|
NA |
w02_ocam2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: Jews
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. For each group, please indicate how
much you like or dislike it:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Jews
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly like |
36 |
8.1% |
0.080717489 |
| 2 |
Significantly like |
110 |
24.7% |
0.246636771 |
| 3 |
Somewhat like |
35 |
7.8% |
0.078475336 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
219 |
49.1% |
0.491031390 |
| 5 |
Misliker noe |
25 |
5.6% |
0.056053812 |
| 6 |
Somewhat dislike |
8 |
1.8% |
0.017937220 |
| 7 |
Strongly dislike |
2 |
0.4% |
0.004484305 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.5% |
0.024663677 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2926 |
|
NA |
w02_ocam2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: Muslims
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. For each group, please indicate how
much you like or dislike it:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly like |
17 |
3.8% |
0.03811659 |
| 2 |
Significantly like |
63 |
14.1% |
0.14125561 |
| 3 |
Somewhat like |
33 |
7.4% |
0.07399103 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
184 |
41.3% |
0.41255605 |
| 5 |
Misliker noe |
67 |
15.0% |
0.15022422 |
| 6 |
Somewhat dislike |
42 |
9.4% |
0.09417040 |
| 7 |
Strongly dislike |
29 |
6.5% |
0.06502242 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.5% |
0.02466368 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2926 |
|
NA |
w02_ocam2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: Protestants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. For each group, please indicate how
much you like or dislike it:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Protestants
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly like |
42 |
9.4% |
0.094170404 |
| 2 |
Significantly like |
124 |
27.8% |
0.278026906 |
| 3 |
Somewhat like |
37 |
8.3% |
0.082959641 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
204 |
45.7% |
0.457399103 |
| 5 |
Misliker noe |
17 |
3.8% |
0.038116592 |
| 6 |
Somewhat dislike |
7 |
1.6% |
0.015695067 |
| 7 |
Strongly dislike |
3 |
0.7% |
0.006726457 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.7% |
0.026905830 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2926 |
|
NA |
w02_ocam2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: Catholics
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. For each group, please indicate how
much you like or dislike it:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Catholics
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly like |
34 |
7.6% |
0.076233184 |
| 2 |
Significantly like |
120 |
26.9% |
0.269058296 |
| 3 |
Somewhat like |
50 |
11.2% |
0.112107623 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
201 |
45.1% |
0.450672646 |
| 5 |
Misliker noe |
24 |
5.4% |
0.053811659 |
| 6 |
Somewhat dislike |
4 |
0.9% |
0.008968610 |
| 7 |
Strongly dislike |
2 |
0.4% |
0.004484305 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.5% |
0.024663677 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2926 |
|
NA |
w02_ocam1
|
Variable label:
|
Thought about human rights violations past week
|
|
Literal question:
|
About how many days in the past week have you thought about human rights
violations in some part of the world?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 days |
64 |
7.6% |
0.07609988 |
| 2 |
1 day |
98 |
11.7% |
0.11652794 |
| 3 |
2 days |
71 |
8.4% |
0.08442331 |
| 4 |
3 days |
63 |
7.5% |
0.07491082 |
| 5 |
4 days |
37 |
4.4% |
0.04399524 |
| 6 |
5 days |
37 |
4.4% |
0.04399524 |
| 7 |
6 days |
10 |
1.2% |
0.01189061 |
| 8 |
7 days |
53 |
6.3% |
0.06302021 |
| 97 |
No answer |
408 |
48.5% |
0.48513674 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2531 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_v1_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1, S=1 and V=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1, S=1 and V=1 into two groups and selects one of the
following questions: OCAM3/OCAM4AB
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:446] [Invalid:2926]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
216 |
48.4% |
0.4843049 |
| 2 |
2 |
230 |
51.6% |
0.5156951 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2926 |
|
NA |
w02_ocam3
|
Variable label:
|
Proportion of blame on Israel in Palestinian conflict
|
|
Literal question:
|
Now we will ask you some questions related to the conflict between
Israel and the Palestinians.
In this conflict, how great a proportion of the blame do you believe
Israel has?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great proportion |
33 |
15.3% |
0.15277778 |
| 2 |
A great proportion |
72 |
33.3% |
0.33333333 |
| 3 |
Some |
85 |
39.4% |
0.39351852 |
| 4 |
A small proportion |
12 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
| 5 |
None at all |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01388889 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
5.1% |
0.05092593 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3156 |
|
NA |
w02_ocam4ab_1
|
Variable label:
|
Proportion of blame on Israeli authorities in Palestinian conflict
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we will ask you some questions related to the conflict between
Israel and the Palestinians.
In this conflict, how great a proportion of the blame do you believe:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Israeli authorities have?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great proportion |
74 |
32.2% |
0.321739130 |
| 2 |
A great proportion |
78 |
33.9% |
0.339130435 |
| 3 |
Some |
56 |
24.3% |
0.243478261 |
| 4 |
A small proportion |
11 |
4.8% |
0.047826087 |
| 5 |
None at all |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004347826 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
4.3% |
0.043478261 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3142 |
|
NA |
w02_ocam4ab_2
|
Variable label:
|
Proportion of blame on Israeli people in Palestinian conflict
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we will ask you some questions related to the conflict between
Israel and the Palestinians.
In this conflict, how great a proportion of the blame do you believe:
|
|
Literal question:
|
the Israeli people has?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great proportion |
10 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
| 2 |
A great proportion |
29 |
12.6% |
0.12608696 |
| 3 |
Some |
105 |
45.7% |
0.45652174 |
| 4 |
A small proportion |
58 |
25.2% |
0.25217391 |
| 5 |
None at all |
15 |
6.5% |
0.06521739 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
5.7% |
0.05652174 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3142 |
|
NA |
w02_ocam5
|
Variable label:
|
Opinon regarding boycott of Israeli products
|
|
Literal question:
|
Israel has accused of violating the human rights of the Palestinians and
has been criticised for its actions in the occupied territories. Due to
this, some people are of the opinion that Norway should introduce a
boycott of all Israeli products. Others are of the opinion that Norway
should introduce a boycott of Israeli products produced in the occupied
territories. Others oppose any boycott of Israeli products. Which of
these opinions is closest to your own?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway should introduce a boycott of all Israeli products |
94 |
21.1% |
0.21076233 |
| 2 |
Norway should introduce a boycott of Israeli products produced in the occupied
territories. |
136 |
30.5% |
0.30493274 |
| 3 |
Norway should not introduce a boycott of Israeli products |
187 |
41.9% |
0.41928251 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
6.5% |
0.06502242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2926 |
|
NA |
w02_ocam6
|
Variable label:
|
Opinon regarding academic boycott of Israel
|
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organizations have supported an
academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the
Palestinians. To which extent do you support or oppose such an academic
boycott of Israel?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strongly support |
28 |
6.3% |
0.06278027 |
| 2 |
Strongly support |
46 |
10.3% |
0.10313901 |
| 3 |
Somewhat strongly support |
62 |
13.9% |
0.13901345 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
170 |
38.1% |
0.38116592 |
| 5 |
Somewhat strongly oppose |
47 |
10.5% |
0.10538117 |
| 6 |
Strongly oppose |
25 |
5.6% |
0.05605381 |
| 7 |
Very strongly oppose |
40 |
9.0% |
0.08968610 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
6.3% |
0.06278027 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2926 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s1_v2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1, S=1 and V=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1, S=1 and V=2 into two groups and selects one of the
following questions: OCT1/OCT2
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:408] [Invalid:2964]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
227 |
55.6% |
0.5563725 |
| 2 |
2 |
181 |
44.4% |
0.4436275 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2964 |
|
NA |
w02_oct1
|
Variable label:
|
Preferanse regarding awarding for participation in the Citizen Panel
|
|
Literal question:
|
As a participant in the Citizen Panel, toward the end of the survey you
are eligible to take part in a draw for an extra money prize. 2 people
will be drawn to win 500 kroner each. Before the draw, we ask that you
choose between two options: Option 1: You keep the 500 kroner if you
win. Option 2: If you win, you participate in a new draw where you have
a 50 per cent chance of winning 1,000 kroner and a 50 per cent chance of
winning nothing. What do you choose? Check one of the options.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Keep the 500 kroner if I win. |
134 |
59.0% |
0.59030837 |
| 2 |
Take part in a draw with a 50 per cent chance to receive 1,000 kroner and a 50
per cent chance to receive nothing. |
89 |
39.2% |
0.39207048 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.8% |
0.01762115 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3145 |
|
NA |
w02_oct2
|
Variable label:
|
Preferanse regarding awarding for participation in the Citizen Panel,
split prize
|
|
Literal question:
|
As a participant in the Citizen Panel, toward the end of the survey you
are eligible to take part in a draw for an extra money prize. 2 people
will be drawn to win 1,000 kroner altogether. The winners must share the
1,000 kroner equally; 500 kroner each. Before the draw, we ask that you
choose between two options: Option 1: You keep your 1,000 kroner, 500
kroner each, if you win. Option 2: If you win, you participate in a new
draw where you have a 50 per cent chance of winning 2,000 kroner, 1,000
kroner each, and a 50 per cent chance of winning nothing. Note that
prizes are only awarded to the winners if they have chosen the same
option. What do you choose? Check one of the options
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Keep our 1,000 kroner; 500 each, if we win |
108 |
59.7% |
0.5966851 |
| 2 |
Take part in a draw with a 50 per cent chance to receive 2,000 kroner, 1,000
each, and a 50 per cent chance to receive nothing. |
65 |
35.9% |
0.3591160 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
4.4% |
0.0441989 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3191 |
|
NA |
w02_dt204_1
|
Variable label:
|
Watch the following programme types on TV: News
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we want to ask you some questions concerning your media habits.
First, how often do you watch the following programme types on TV?
|
|
Literal question:
|
News
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
626 |
74.3% |
0.74346793 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
130 |
15.4% |
0.15439430 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
44 |
5.2% |
0.05225653 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
29 |
3.4% |
0.03444181 |
| 5 |
Never |
13 |
1.5% |
0.01543943 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt204_2
|
Variable label:
|
Watch the following programme types on TV: Documentaries
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we want to ask you some questions concerning your media habits.
First, how often do you watch the following programme types on TV?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Documentaries
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
67 |
8.0% |
0.079572447 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
398 |
47.3% |
0.472684086 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
263 |
31.2% |
0.312351544 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
97 |
11.5% |
0.115201900 |
| 5 |
Never |
13 |
1.5% |
0.015439430 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004750594 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt204_3
|
Variable label:
|
Watch the following programme types on TV: Debate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we want to ask you some questions concerning your media habits.
First, how often do you watch the following programme types on TV?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Debate
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
33 |
3.9% |
0.039192399 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
246 |
29.2% |
0.292161520 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
248 |
29.5% |
0.294536817 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
249 |
29.6% |
0.295724466 |
| 5 |
Never |
58 |
6.9% |
0.068883610 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt204_4
|
Variable label:
|
Watch the following programme types on TV: Consumer/health/lifestyle
programmes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we want to ask you some questions concerning your media habits.
First, how often do you watch the following programme types on TV?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consumer/health/lifestyle programmes
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
13 |
1.5% |
0.015439430 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
275 |
32.7% |
0.326603325 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
331 |
39.3% |
0.393111639 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
184 |
21.9% |
0.218527316 |
| 5 |
Never |
36 |
4.3% |
0.042755344 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt204_5
|
Variable label:
|
Watch the following programme types on TV: Documentary soap/reality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we want to ask you some questions concerning your media habits.
First, how often do you watch the following programme types on TV?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Documentary soap/reality
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
33 |
3.9% |
0.039192399 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
87 |
10.3% |
0.103325416 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
117 |
13.9% |
0.138954869 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
249 |
29.6% |
0.295724466 |
| 5 |
Never |
349 |
41.4% |
0.414489311 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt204_6
|
Variable label:
|
Watch the following programme types on TV: Films
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we want to ask you some questions concerning your media habits.
First, how often do you watch the following programme types on TV?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Films
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
31 |
3.7% |
0.036817102 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
264 |
31.4% |
0.313539192 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
296 |
35.2% |
0.351543943 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
209 |
24.8% |
0.248218527 |
| 5 |
Never |
39 |
4.6% |
0.046318290 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt204_7
|
Variable label:
|
Watch the following programme types on TV: TV series
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we want to ask you some questions concerning your media habits.
First, how often do you watch the following programme types on TV?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV series
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
89 |
10.6% |
0.10570071 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
339 |
40.3% |
0.40261283 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
201 |
23.9% |
0.23871734 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
141 |
16.7% |
0.16745843 |
| 5 |
Never |
61 |
7.2% |
0.07244656 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01306413 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt204_8
|
Variable label:
|
Watch the following programme types on TV: Entertainment/ humour
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we want to ask you some questions concerning your media habits.
First, how often do you watch the following programme types on TV?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Entertainment/ humour
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
60 |
7.1% |
0.071258907 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
391 |
46.4% |
0.464370546 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
256 |
30.4% |
0.304038005 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
103 |
12.2% |
0.122327791 |
| 5 |
Never |
30 |
3.6% |
0.035629454 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002375297 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt204_9
|
Variable label:
|
Watch the following programme types on TV: Sports
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we want to ask you some questions concerning your media habits.
First, how often do you watch the following programme types on TV?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sports
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
72 |
8.6% |
0.08571429 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
320 |
38.1% |
0.38095238 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
170 |
20.2% |
0.20238095 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
182 |
21.7% |
0.21666667 |
| 5 |
Never |
96 |
11.4% |
0.11428571 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2532 |
|
NA |
w02_dt205_1
|
Variable label:
|
Read the following types of material in newspapers: International news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you read the following types of material in newspapers
(online newspapers and/or printed newspapers)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
International news
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
609 |
72.3% |
0.723277910 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
133 |
15.8% |
0.157957245 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
69 |
8.2% |
0.081947743 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
24 |
2.9% |
0.028503563 |
| 5 |
Never |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005938242 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002375297 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt205_2
|
Variable label:
|
Read the following types of material in newspapers: Domestic news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you read the following types of material in newspapers
(online newspapers and/or printed newspapers)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Domestic news
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
697 |
82.8% |
0.827790974 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
89 |
10.6% |
0.105700713 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
38 |
4.5% |
0.045130641 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
14 |
1.7% |
0.016627078 |
| 5 |
Never |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001187648 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt205_3
|
Variable label:
|
Read the following types of material in newspapers: Local news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you read the following types of material in newspapers
(online newspapers and/or printed newspapers)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Local news
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
551 |
65.4% |
0.654394299 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
178 |
21.1% |
0.211401425 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
80 |
9.5% |
0.095011876 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
22 |
2.6% |
0.026128266 |
| 5 |
Never |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004750594 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt205_4
|
Variable label:
|
Read the following types of material in newspapers: Health/ consumer/
lifestyle
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you read the following types of material in newspapers
(online newspapers and/or printed newspapers)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health/ consumer/ lifestyle
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
145 |
17.2% |
0.172209026 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
324 |
38.5% |
0.384798100 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
265 |
31.5% |
0.314726841 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
83 |
9.9% |
0.098574822 |
| 5 |
Never |
17 |
2.0% |
0.020190024 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt205_5
|
Variable label:
|
Read the following types of material in newspapers: Debate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you read the following types of material in newspapers
(online newspapers and/or printed newspapers)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Debate
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
153 |
18.2% |
0.181710214 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
285 |
33.8% |
0.338479810 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
240 |
28.5% |
0.285035629 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
124 |
14.7% |
0.147268409 |
| 5 |
Never |
32 |
3.8% |
0.038004751 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt205_6
|
Variable label:
|
Read the following types of material in newspapers: Culture and feature
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you read the following types of material in newspapers
(online newspapers and/or printed newspapers)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Culture and feature
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
134 |
15.9% |
0.159144893 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
276 |
32.8% |
0.327790974 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
245 |
29.1% |
0.290973872 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
144 |
17.1% |
0.171021378 |
| 5 |
Never |
36 |
4.3% |
0.042755344 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt205_7
|
Variable label:
|
Read the following types of material in newspapers: Entertainment and
celebrity news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you read the following types of material in newspapers
(online newspapers and/or printed newspapers)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Entertainment and celebrity news
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
55 |
6.5% |
0.065320665 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
141 |
16.7% |
0.167458432 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
286 |
34.0% |
0.339667458 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
259 |
30.8% |
0.307600950 |
| 5 |
Never |
93 |
11.0% |
0.110451306 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt205_8
|
Variable label:
|
Read the following types of material in newspapers: Sports
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you read the following types of material in newspapers
(online newspapers and/or printed newspapers)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sports
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
220 |
26.1% |
0.261282660 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
162 |
19.2% |
0.192399050 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
166 |
19.7% |
0.197149644 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
168 |
20.0% |
0.199524941 |
| 5 |
Never |
118 |
14.0% |
0.140142518 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt206_1
|
Variable label:
|
Use social media: Facebook
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How frequently do you use social media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Facebook
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
391 |
46.4% |
0.464370546 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
115 |
13.7% |
0.136579572 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
51 |
6.1% |
0.060570071 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
46 |
5.5% |
0.054631829 |
| 5 |
Never |
234 |
27.8% |
0.277909739 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005938242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt206_2
|
Variable label:
|
Use social media: Twitter
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How frequently do you use social media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Twitter
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
30 |
3.6% |
0.03562945 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
30 |
3.6% |
0.03562945 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
48 |
5.7% |
0.05700713 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
75 |
8.9% |
0.08907363 |
| 5 |
Never |
650 |
77.2% |
0.77197150 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01068884 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt206_3
|
Variable label:
|
Use social media: Own blog
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How frequently do you use social media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Own blog
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002375297 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
18 |
2.1% |
0.021377672 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
26 |
3.1% |
0.030878860 |
| 5 |
Never |
777 |
92.3% |
0.922802850 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.013064133 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt206_4
|
Variable label:
|
Use social media: Other people’s blogs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How frequently do you use social media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other people’s blogs
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
17 |
2.0% |
0.020190024 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
45 |
5.3% |
0.053444181 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
87 |
10.3% |
0.103325416 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
205 |
24.3% |
0.243467933 |
| 5 |
Never |
480 |
57.0% |
0.570071259 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt206_5
|
Variable label:
|
Use social media: Comment fields in online newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How frequently do you use social media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Comment fields in online newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
30 |
3.6% |
0.03562945 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
73 |
8.7% |
0.08669834 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
104 |
12.4% |
0.12351544 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
176 |
20.9% |
0.20902613 |
| 5 |
Never |
449 |
53.3% |
0.53325416 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.2% |
0.01187648 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt206_6
|
Variable label:
|
Use social media: Online fora
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How frequently do you use social media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Online fora
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
32 |
3.8% |
0.03800475 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
50 |
5.9% |
0.05938242 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
88 |
10.5% |
0.10451306 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
163 |
19.4% |
0.19358670 |
| 5 |
Never |
495 |
58.8% |
0.58788599 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.7% |
0.01662708 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt206_7
|
Variable label:
|
Use social media: Other social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How frequently do you use social media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other social media
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
85 |
10.1% |
0.10095012 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
99 |
11.8% |
0.11757720 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
109 |
12.9% |
0.12945368 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
171 |
20.3% |
0.20308789 |
| 5 |
Never |
363 |
43.1% |
0.43111639 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01781473 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt207
|
Variable label:
|
Use of smartphone or tablet to get news updates
|
|
Literal question:
|
How frequently do you use a smartphone or tablet to get news updates?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
315 |
37.4% |
0.374109264 |
| 2 |
Every day |
206 |
24.5% |
0.244655582 |
| 3 |
Weekly |
99 |
11.8% |
0.117577197 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
95 |
11.3% |
0.112826603 |
| 5 |
Never |
126 |
15.0% |
0.149643705 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001187648 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt208
|
Variable label:
|
If the household subscribes to newspaper
|
|
Literal question:
|
Does your household subscribe to newspapers?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
256 |
30.4% |
0.304038005 |
| 2 |
Yes, subscribes to one newspaper |
323 |
38.4% |
0.383610451 |
| 3 |
Yes, subscribes to several newspapers |
260 |
30.9% |
0.308788599 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt209a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: NRK
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
NRK
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
436 |
51.8% |
0.517814727 |
| 2 |
Important |
212 |
25.2% |
0.251781473 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
97 |
11.5% |
0.115201900 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
51 |
6.1% |
0.060570071 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
41 |
4.9% |
0.048693587 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005938242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt209a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: P4
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
P4
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
26 |
3.1% |
0.03087886 |
| 2 |
Important |
70 |
8.3% |
0.08313539 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
145 |
17.2% |
0.17220903 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
214 |
25.4% |
0.25415677 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
337 |
40.0% |
0.40023753 |
| 97 |
No answer |
50 |
5.9% |
0.05938242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt209a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Radio Norge
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Radio Norge
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02375297 |
| 2 |
Important |
44 |
5.2% |
0.05225653 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
117 |
13.9% |
0.13895487 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
219 |
26.0% |
0.26009501 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
394 |
46.8% |
0.46793349 |
| 97 |
No answer |
48 |
5.7% |
0.05700713 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt209a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Local radio
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Local radio
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
38 |
4.5% |
0.04513064 |
| 2 |
Important |
74 |
8.8% |
0.08788599 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
117 |
13.9% |
0.13895487 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
210 |
24.9% |
0.24940618 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
360 |
42.8% |
0.42755344 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
5.1% |
0.05106888 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt209a_5
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Others
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Others
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
51 |
6.1% |
0.06057007 |
| 2 |
Important |
59 |
7.0% |
0.07007126 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
112 |
13.3% |
0.13301663 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
202 |
24.0% |
0.23990499 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
345 |
41.0% |
0.40973872 |
| 97 |
No answer |
73 |
8.7% |
0.08669834 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt209b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: NRK
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
NRK
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
461 |
54.8% |
0.54750594 |
| 2 |
Important |
226 |
26.8% |
0.26840855 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
74 |
8.8% |
0.08788599 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
35 |
4.2% |
0.04156770 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
29 |
3.4% |
0.03444181 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02019002 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt209b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: TV 2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV 2
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
240 |
28.5% |
0.28503563 |
| 2 |
Important |
306 |
36.3% |
0.36342043 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
144 |
17.1% |
0.17102138 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
81 |
9.6% |
0.09619952 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
56 |
6.7% |
0.06650831 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01781473 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt209b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Others
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Others
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
64 |
7.6% |
0.07600950 |
| 2 |
Important |
124 |
14.7% |
0.14726841 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
173 |
20.5% |
0.20546318 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
196 |
23.3% |
0.23277910 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
204 |
24.2% |
0.24228029 |
| 97 |
No answer |
81 |
9.6% |
0.09619952 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt209c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Facebook
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Facebook
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
72 |
8.6% |
0.08551069 |
| 2 |
Important |
108 |
12.8% |
0.12826603 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
148 |
17.6% |
0.17577197 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
169 |
20.1% |
0.20071259 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
330 |
39.2% |
0.39192399 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01781473 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt209c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Twitter
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Twitter
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
14 |
1.7% |
0.01662708 |
| 2 |
Important |
27 |
3.2% |
0.03206651 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
35 |
4.2% |
0.04156770 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
109 |
12.9% |
0.12945368 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
621 |
73.8% |
0.73752969 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
4.3% |
0.04275534 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt209c_3
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Blogs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Blogs
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004750594 |
| 2 |
Important |
11 |
1.3% |
0.013064133 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
48 |
5.7% |
0.057007126 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
137 |
16.3% |
0.162707838 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
611 |
72.6% |
0.725653207 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
3.7% |
0.036817102 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt209c_4
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Others
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Others
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
24 |
2.9% |
0.02850356 |
| 2 |
Important |
31 |
3.7% |
0.03681710 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
82 |
9.7% |
0.09738717 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
132 |
15.7% |
0.15676960 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
531 |
63.1% |
0.63064133 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
5.0% |
0.04988124 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: VG
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
VG
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
125 |
14.8% |
0.14845606 |
| 2 |
Important |
212 |
25.2% |
0.25178147 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
164 |
19.5% |
0.19477435 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
164 |
19.5% |
0.19477435 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
160 |
19.0% |
0.19002375 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02019002 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Dagbladet
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Dagbladet
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
81 |
9.6% |
0.09619952 |
| 2 |
Important |
159 |
18.9% |
0.18883610 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
204 |
24.2% |
0.24228029 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
191 |
22.7% |
0.22684086 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
182 |
21.6% |
0.21615202 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
3.0% |
0.02969121 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Dagens Næringsliv
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Dagens Næringsliv
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
36 |
4.3% |
0.04275534 |
| 2 |
Important |
140 |
16.6% |
0.16627078 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
166 |
19.7% |
0.19714964 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
195 |
23.2% |
0.23159145 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
268 |
31.8% |
0.31828979 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
4.4% |
0.04394299 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Klassekampen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Klassekampen
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
25 |
3.0% |
0.02969121 |
| 2 |
Important |
24 |
2.9% |
0.02850356 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
55 |
6.5% |
0.06532067 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
174 |
20.7% |
0.20665083 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
525 |
62.4% |
0.62351544 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
4.6% |
0.04631829 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210a_5
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Morgenbladet
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Morgenbladet
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01425178 |
| 2 |
Important |
24 |
2.9% |
0.02850356 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
63 |
7.5% |
0.07482185 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
157 |
18.6% |
0.18646081 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
545 |
64.7% |
0.64726841 |
| 97 |
No answer |
41 |
4.9% |
0.04869359 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210a_6
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Dagsavisen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Dagsavisen
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01068884 |
| 2 |
Important |
23 |
2.7% |
0.02731591 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
65 |
7.7% |
0.07719715 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
179 |
21.3% |
0.21258907 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
527 |
62.6% |
0.62589074 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
4.6% |
0.04631829 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210a_7
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Nationen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nationen
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 2 |
Important |
15 |
1.8% |
0.017814727 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
26 |
3.1% |
0.030878860 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
145 |
17.2% |
0.172209026 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
613 |
72.8% |
0.728028504 |
| 97 |
No answer |
40 |
4.8% |
0.047505938 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210a_8
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Vårt Land
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vårt Land
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
10 |
1.2% |
0.01187648 |
| 2 |
Important |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02256532 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
22 |
2.6% |
0.02612827 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
135 |
16.0% |
0.16033254 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
614 |
72.9% |
0.72921615 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
5.0% |
0.04988124 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210a_9
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Others
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Others
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
74 |
8.8% |
0.08788599 |
| 2 |
Important |
105 |
12.5% |
0.12470309 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
116 |
13.8% |
0.13776722 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
130 |
15.4% |
0.15439430 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
372 |
44.2% |
0.44180523 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
5.3% |
0.05344418 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Aftenposten
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Aftenposten
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
188 |
22.3% |
0.22327791 |
| 2 |
Important |
182 |
21.6% |
0.21615202 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
157 |
18.6% |
0.18646081 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
114 |
13.5% |
0.13539192 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
173 |
20.5% |
0.20546318 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
3.3% |
0.03325416 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Bergens Tidende
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Bergens Tidende
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
55 |
6.5% |
0.06532067 |
| 2 |
Important |
43 |
5.1% |
0.05106888 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
53 |
6.3% |
0.06294537 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
110 |
13.1% |
0.13064133 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
540 |
64.1% |
0.64133017 |
| 97 |
No answer |
41 |
4.9% |
0.04869359 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Adresseavisen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Adresseavisen
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
33 |
3.9% |
0.03919240 |
| 2 |
Important |
27 |
3.2% |
0.03206651 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
48 |
5.7% |
0.05700713 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
107 |
12.7% |
0.12707838 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
580 |
68.9% |
0.68883610 |
| 97 |
No answer |
47 |
5.6% |
0.05581948 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Stavanger Aftenblad
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Stavanger Aftenblad
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
24 |
2.9% |
0.02850356 |
| 2 |
Important |
28 |
3.3% |
0.03325416 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
34 |
4.0% |
0.04038005 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
98 |
11.6% |
0.11638955 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
617 |
73.3% |
0.73277910 |
| 97 |
No answer |
41 |
4.9% |
0.04869359 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210b_5
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Fædrelandsvennen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fædrelandsvennen
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01068884 |
| 2 |
Important |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01900238 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
27 |
3.2% |
0.03206651 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
89 |
10.6% |
0.10570071 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
656 |
77.9% |
0.77909739 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
5.3% |
0.05344418 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210b_6
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Nordlys
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nordlys
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01306413 |
| 2 |
Important |
14 |
1.7% |
0.01662708 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
28 |
3.3% |
0.03325416 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
101 |
12.0% |
0.11995249 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
642 |
76.2% |
0.76247031 |
| 97 |
No answer |
46 |
5.5% |
0.05463183 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210b_7
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Avisa Nordland
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Avisa Nordland
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004750594 |
| 2 |
Important |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
24 |
2.9% |
0.028503563 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
100 |
11.9% |
0.118764846 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
658 |
78.1% |
0.781472684 |
| 97 |
No answer |
48 |
5.7% |
0.057007126 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210b_8
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Sunnmørsposten
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sunnmørsposten
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01781473 |
| 2 |
Important |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01425178 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
25 |
3.0% |
0.02969121 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
94 |
11.2% |
0.11163895 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
644 |
76.5% |
0.76484561 |
| 97 |
No answer |
52 |
6.2% |
0.06175772 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210b_9
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Others
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Others
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
42 |
5.0% |
0.04988124 |
| 2 |
Important |
56 |
6.7% |
0.06650831 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
95 |
11.3% |
0.11282660 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
121 |
14.4% |
0.14370546 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
466 |
55.3% |
0.55344418 |
| 97 |
No answer |
62 |
7.4% |
0.07363420 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt210c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Important source of news: Local newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And how important are the following media to you as a source of news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Local newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
231 |
27.4% |
0.27434679 |
| 2 |
Important |
277 |
32.9% |
0.32897862 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
177 |
21.0% |
0.21021378 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
88 |
10.5% |
0.10451306 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
48 |
5.7% |
0.05700713 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02494062 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt211ah_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: In Norway we have open and democratic social debate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In Norway we have open and democratic social debate.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
138 |
16.4% |
0.163895487 |
| 2 |
Agree |
438 |
52.0% |
0.520190024 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
193 |
22.9% |
0.229216152 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
27 |
3.2% |
0.032066508 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
31 |
3.7% |
0.036817102 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007125891 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007125891 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt211ah_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: In general, Norwegian media is of high quality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, Norwegian media is of high quality.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
59 |
7.0% |
0.070071259 |
| 2 |
Agree |
333 |
39.5% |
0.395486936 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
261 |
31.0% |
0.309976247 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
70 |
8.3% |
0.083135392 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
74 |
8.8% |
0.087885986 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
32 |
3.8% |
0.038004751 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005938242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt211ah_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The task of the media is not to criticize, but to report
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The task of the media is not to criticize, but to report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
103 |
12.2% |
0.12232779 |
| 2 |
Agree |
247 |
29.3% |
0.29334917 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
183 |
21.7% |
0.21733967 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
104 |
12.4% |
0.12351544 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
111 |
13.2% |
0.13182898 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
65 |
7.7% |
0.07719715 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02256532 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.2% |
0.01187648 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt211ah_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The task of the media is to defend the individual against the
system
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The task of the media is to defend the individual against the system.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
88 |
10.5% |
0.104513064 |
| 2 |
Agree |
222 |
26.4% |
0.263657957 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
252 |
29.9% |
0.299287411 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
181 |
21.5% |
0.214964371 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
54 |
6.4% |
0.064133017 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
27 |
3.2% |
0.032066508 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.2% |
0.011876485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt211ah_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The media should examine society’s powers that be
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media should examine society’s powers that be.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
214 |
25.4% |
0.254156770 |
| 2 |
Agree |
363 |
43.1% |
0.431116390 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
168 |
20.0% |
0.199524941 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
56 |
6.7% |
0.066508314 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
18 |
2.1% |
0.021377672 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.5% |
0.015439430 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt211ah_6
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The media must influence the political agenda
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media must influence the political agenda.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
53 |
6.3% |
0.06294537 |
| 2 |
Agree |
194 |
23.0% |
0.23040380 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
246 |
29.2% |
0.29216152 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
171 |
20.3% |
0.20308789 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
79 |
9.4% |
0.09382423 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
64 |
7.6% |
0.07600950 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
25 |
3.0% |
0.02969121 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.2% |
0.01187648 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt211ah_7
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The media must give ordinary people a voice
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media must give ordinary people a voice.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
149 |
17.7% |
0.176959620 |
| 2 |
Agree |
342 |
40.6% |
0.406175772 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
229 |
27.2% |
0.271971496 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
89 |
10.6% |
0.105700713 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
16 |
1.9% |
0.019002375 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004750594 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.2% |
0.011876485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt211ah_8
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The media are not critical enough of authorities and
institutions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media are not critical enough of authorities and institutions.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
64 |
7.6% |
0.07600950 |
| 2 |
Agree |
143 |
17.0% |
0.16983373 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
213 |
25.3% |
0.25296912 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
198 |
23.5% |
0.23515439 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
124 |
14.7% |
0.14726841 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
77 |
9.1% |
0.09144893 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
10 |
1.2% |
0.01187648 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.5% |
0.01543943 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt212ah_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The media reports too little material that concerns the
everyday life of people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And to which extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media reports too little material that concerns the everyday life of
people.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
26 |
3.1% |
0.03087886 |
| 2 |
Agree |
95 |
11.3% |
0.11282660 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
198 |
23.5% |
0.23515439 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
249 |
29.6% |
0.29572447 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
148 |
17.6% |
0.17577197 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
94 |
11.2% |
0.11163895 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02256532 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.5% |
0.01543943 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt212ah_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The media has too much focus on individual cases
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And to which extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media has too much focus on individual cases.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
58 |
6.9% |
0.068883610 |
| 2 |
Agree |
168 |
20.0% |
0.199524941 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
277 |
32.9% |
0.328978622 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
201 |
23.9% |
0.238717340 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
87 |
10.3% |
0.103325416 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
36 |
4.3% |
0.042755344 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.014251781 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt212ah_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Many media are too inaccurate with facts and quotes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And to which extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Many media are too inaccurate with facts and quotes.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
99 |
11.8% |
0.117577197 |
| 2 |
Agree |
225 |
26.7% |
0.267220903 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
286 |
34.0% |
0.339667458 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
155 |
18.4% |
0.184085511 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
37 |
4.4% |
0.043942993 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
25 |
3.0% |
0.029691211 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001187648 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.7% |
0.016627078 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt212ah_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The media provide important information on the Norwegian
welfare state
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And to which extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media provide important information on the Norwegian welfare state.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
33 |
3.9% |
0.039192399 |
| 2 |
Agree |
291 |
34.6% |
0.345605701 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
298 |
35.4% |
0.353919240 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
138 |
16.4% |
0.163895487 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
54 |
6.4% |
0.064133017 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
9 |
1.1% |
0.010688836 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007125891 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.5% |
0.015439430 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt212ah_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Health journalism is too focused on individuals
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And to which extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health journalism is too focused on individuals.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
41 |
4.9% |
0.048693587 |
| 2 |
Agree |
116 |
13.8% |
0.137767221 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
232 |
27.6% |
0.275534442 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
315 |
37.4% |
0.374109264 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
71 |
8.4% |
0.084323040 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
42 |
5.0% |
0.049881235 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004750594 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.024940618 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt212ah_6
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The media is too critical of NAV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And to which extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media is too critical of NAV.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01900238 |
| 2 |
Agree |
51 |
6.1% |
0.06057007 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
147 |
17.5% |
0.17458432 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
268 |
31.8% |
0.31828979 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
156 |
18.5% |
0.18527316 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
134 |
15.9% |
0.15914489 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
57 |
6.8% |
0.06769596 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.5% |
0.01543943 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt212ah_7
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The media is too critical of the health services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
And to which extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The media is too critical of the health services.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01781473 |
| 2 |
Agree |
95 |
11.3% |
0.11282660 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
171 |
20.3% |
0.20308789 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
220 |
26.1% |
0.26128266 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
183 |
21.7% |
0.21733967 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
108 |
12.8% |
0.12826603 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
37 |
4.4% |
0.04394299 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.5% |
0.01543943 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt213_1
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in news media: NRK news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which degree of confidence do you have in the following news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
NRK news
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
329 |
39.1% |
0.390736342 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
395 |
46.9% |
0.469121140 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
95 |
11.3% |
0.112826603 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 5 |
Not confidence at all |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005938242 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.2% |
0.011876485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt213_2
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in news media: TV 2 news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which degree of confidence do you have in the following news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV 2 news
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
169 |
20.1% |
0.200712589 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
419 |
49.8% |
0.497624703 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
202 |
24.0% |
0.239904988 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
25 |
3.0% |
0.029691211 |
| 5 |
Not confidence at all |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.3% |
0.022565321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt213_3
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in news media: VG
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which degree of confidence do you have in the following news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
VG
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
26 |
3.1% |
0.03087886 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
158 |
18.8% |
0.18764846 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
411 |
48.8% |
0.48812352 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
181 |
21.5% |
0.21496437 |
| 5 |
Not confidence at all |
44 |
5.2% |
0.05225653 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
2.6% |
0.02612827 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt213_4
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in news media: Dagbladet
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which degree of confidence do you have in the following news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Dagbladet
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02494062 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
148 |
17.6% |
0.17577197 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
417 |
49.5% |
0.49524941 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
177 |
21.0% |
0.21021378 |
| 5 |
Not confidence at all |
45 |
5.3% |
0.05344418 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
4.0% |
0.04038005 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt213_5
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in news media: Aftenposten
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which degree of confidence do you have in the following news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Aftenposten
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
138 |
16.4% |
0.16389549 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
398 |
47.3% |
0.47268409 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
220 |
26.1% |
0.26128266 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
30 |
3.6% |
0.03562945 |
| 5 |
Not confidence at all |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01425178 |
| 97 |
No answer |
44 |
5.2% |
0.05225653 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt213_6
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in news media: Dagens Næringsliv
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which degree of confidence do you have in the following news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Dagens Næringsliv
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
79 |
9.4% |
0.09382423 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
359 |
42.6% |
0.42636580 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
282 |
33.5% |
0.33491686 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
42 |
5.0% |
0.04988124 |
| 5 |
Not confidence at all |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02375297 |
| 97 |
No answer |
60 |
7.1% |
0.07125891 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt213_7
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in news media: Klassekampen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which degree of confidence do you have in the following news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Klassekampen
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
38 |
4.5% |
0.04513064 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
157 |
18.6% |
0.18646081 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
328 |
39.0% |
0.38954869 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
146 |
17.3% |
0.17339667 |
| 5 |
Not confidence at all |
97 |
11.5% |
0.11520190 |
| 97 |
No answer |
76 |
9.0% |
0.09026128 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt213_8
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in news media: Regional newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which degree of confidence do you have in the following news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Regional newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
27 |
3.2% |
0.03206651 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
225 |
26.7% |
0.26722090 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
390 |
46.3% |
0.46318290 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
75 |
8.9% |
0.08907363 |
| 5 |
Not confidence at all |
44 |
5.2% |
0.05225653 |
| 97 |
No answer |
81 |
9.6% |
0.09619952 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt213_9
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in news media: Local newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which degree of confidence do you have in the following news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Local newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
49 |
5.8% |
0.05819477 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
342 |
40.6% |
0.40617577 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
341 |
40.5% |
0.40498812 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
58 |
6.9% |
0.06888361 |
| 5 |
Not confidence at all |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02019002 |
| 97 |
No answer |
35 |
4.2% |
0.04156770 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt214_1
|
Variable label:
|
Interested in following news coverage: Health and welfare policy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which degree are you interested in following news coverage of the
following subjects?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health and welfare policy
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
235 |
27.9% |
0.279097387 |
| 2 |
Interested |
403 |
47.9% |
0.478622328 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
159 |
18.9% |
0.188836105 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
28 |
3.3% |
0.033254157 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004750594 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.5% |
0.015439430 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt214_2
|
Variable label:
|
Interested in following news coverage: The future of the Norwegian
welfare state
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which degree are you interested in following news coverage of the
following subjects?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The future of the Norwegian welfare state
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
245 |
29.1% |
0.290973872 |
| 2 |
Interested |
443 |
52.6% |
0.526128266 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
117 |
13.9% |
0.138954869 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
22 |
2.6% |
0.026128266 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.014251781 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt214_3
|
Variable label:
|
Interested in following news coverage: The restructuring of the hospital
sector
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which degree are you interested in following news coverage of the
following subjects?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The restructuring of the hospital sector
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
178 |
21.1% |
0.211401425 |
| 2 |
Interested |
329 |
39.1% |
0.390736342 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
235 |
27.9% |
0.279097387 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
78 |
9.3% |
0.092636580 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.017814727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt214_4
|
Variable label:
|
Interested in following news coverage: Police and contingency
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which degree are you interested in following news coverage of the
following subjects?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Police and contingency
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
169 |
20.1% |
0.200712589 |
| 2 |
Interested |
397 |
47.1% |
0.471496437 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
214 |
25.4% |
0.254156770 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
42 |
5.0% |
0.049881235 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005938242 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.017814727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt214_5
|
Variable label:
|
Interested in following news coverage: The pension reform
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which degree are you interested in following news coverage of the
following subjects?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The pension reform
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
141 |
16.7% |
0.16745843 |
| 2 |
Interested |
348 |
41.3% |
0.41330166 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
227 |
27.0% |
0.26959620 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
100 |
11.9% |
0.11876485 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
14 |
1.7% |
0.01662708 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01425178 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt214_6
|
Variable label:
|
Interested in following news coverage: Dental health services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which degree are you interested in following news coverage of the
following subjects?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Dental health services
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
96 |
11.4% |
0.11401425 |
| 2 |
Interested |
248 |
29.5% |
0.29453682 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
291 |
34.6% |
0.34560570 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
167 |
19.8% |
0.19833729 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
25 |
3.0% |
0.02969121 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01781473 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt214_7
|
Variable label:
|
Interested in following news coverage: Day-care centre development
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which degree are you interested in following news coverage of the
following subjects?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Day-care centre development
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
65 |
7.7% |
0.07719715 |
| 2 |
Interested |
194 |
23.0% |
0.23040380 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
276 |
32.8% |
0.32779097 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
223 |
26.5% |
0.26484561 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
64 |
7.6% |
0.07600950 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02375297 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt214_8
|
Variable label:
|
Interested in following news coverage: School policy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which degree are you interested in following news coverage of the
following subjects?
|
|
Literal question:
|
School policy
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
236 |
28.0% |
0.28028504 |
| 2 |
Interested |
342 |
40.6% |
0.40617577 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
172 |
20.4% |
0.20427553 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
49 |
5.8% |
0.05819477 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
22 |
2.6% |
0.02612827 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02494062 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt214_9
|
Variable label:
|
Interested in following news coverage: Care for the elderly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which degree are you interested in following news coverage of the
following subjects?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Care for the elderly
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
221 |
26.2% |
0.26247031 |
| 2 |
Interested |
374 |
44.4% |
0.44418052 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
160 |
19.0% |
0.19002375 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
59 |
7.0% |
0.07007126 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01306413 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02019002 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt214_10
|
Variable label:
|
Interested in following news coverage: NAV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which degree are you interested in following news coverage of the
following subjects?
|
|
Literal question:
|
NAV
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
103 |
12.2% |
0.12232779 |
| 2 |
Interested |
320 |
38.0% |
0.38004751 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
271 |
32.2% |
0.32185273 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
110 |
13.1% |
0.13064133 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
22 |
2.6% |
0.02612827 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01900238 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt214_11
|
Variable label:
|
Interested in following news coverage: Closure of local hospitals
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which degree are you interested in following news coverage of the
following subjects?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Closure of local hospitals
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
200 |
23.8% |
0.23752969 |
| 2 |
Interested |
309 |
36.7% |
0.36698337 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
198 |
23.5% |
0.23515439 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
92 |
10.9% |
0.10926366 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
29 |
3.4% |
0.03444181 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.7% |
0.01662708 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt214_12
|
Variable label:
|
Interested in following news coverage: Merging of hospitals in the Oslo
area
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which degree are you interested in following news coverage of the
following subjects?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Merging of hospitals in the Oslo area
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
95 |
11.3% |
0.11282660 |
| 2 |
Interested |
191 |
22.7% |
0.22684086 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
213 |
25.3% |
0.25296912 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
206 |
24.5% |
0.24465558 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
120 |
14.3% |
0.14251781 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02019002 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_1
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: Visit a NAV office
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Visit a NAV office
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
182 |
21.6% |
0.21615202 |
| 2 |
Likely |
199 |
23.6% |
0.23634204 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
177 |
21.0% |
0.21021378 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
179 |
21.3% |
0.21258907 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
80 |
9.5% |
0.09501188 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
3.0% |
0.02969121 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_2
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: Visit other public agencies
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Visit other public agencies
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
29 |
3.4% |
0.03444181 |
| 2 |
Likely |
160 |
19.0% |
0.19002375 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
248 |
29.5% |
0.29453682 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
255 |
30.3% |
0.30285036 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
105 |
12.5% |
0.12470309 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
5.3% |
0.05344418 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_3
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: Use NAV’s website
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Use NAV’s website
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
402 |
47.7% |
0.47743468 |
| 2 |
Likely |
266 |
31.6% |
0.31591449 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
89 |
10.6% |
0.10570071 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
34 |
4.0% |
0.04038005 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02256532 |
| 97 |
No answer |
32 |
3.8% |
0.03800475 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_4
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: Call NAV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Call NAV
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
158 |
18.8% |
0.18764846 |
| 2 |
Likely |
264 |
31.4% |
0.31353919 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
207 |
24.6% |
0.24584323 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
117 |
13.9% |
0.13895487 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
54 |
6.4% |
0.06413302 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
5.0% |
0.04988124 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_5
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: Search the web
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Search the web
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
410 |
48.7% |
0.48693587 |
| 2 |
Likely |
277 |
32.9% |
0.32897862 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
86 |
10.2% |
0.10213777 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
26 |
3.1% |
0.03087886 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01306413 |
| 97 |
No answer |
32 |
3.8% |
0.03800475 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_6
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: Newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
37 |
4.4% |
0.04394299 |
| 2 |
Likely |
129 |
15.3% |
0.15320665 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
199 |
23.6% |
0.23634204 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
282 |
33.5% |
0.33491686 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
145 |
17.2% |
0.17220903 |
| 97 |
No answer |
50 |
5.9% |
0.05938242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_7
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: TV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
34 |
4.0% |
0.04038005 |
| 2 |
Likely |
114 |
13.5% |
0.13539192 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
170 |
20.2% |
0.20190024 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
304 |
36.1% |
0.36104513 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
170 |
20.2% |
0.20190024 |
| 97 |
No answer |
50 |
5.9% |
0.05938242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_8
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: Periodicals and magazines
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Periodicals and magazines
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 2 |
Likely |
28 |
3.3% |
0.033254157 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
90 |
10.7% |
0.106888361 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
304 |
36.1% |
0.361045131 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
366 |
43.5% |
0.434679335 |
| 97 |
No answer |
47 |
5.6% |
0.055819477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_9
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: Social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social media
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
31 |
3.7% |
0.03681710 |
| 2 |
Likely |
73 |
8.7% |
0.08669834 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
128 |
15.2% |
0.15201900 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
265 |
31.5% |
0.31472684 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
298 |
35.4% |
0.35391924 |
| 97 |
No answer |
47 |
5.6% |
0.05581948 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_10
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: Family
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Family
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
107 |
12.7% |
0.12707838 |
| 2 |
Likely |
265 |
31.5% |
0.31472684 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
257 |
30.5% |
0.30522565 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
100 |
11.9% |
0.11876485 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
68 |
8.1% |
0.08076010 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
5.3% |
0.05344418 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_11
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: Friends
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
98 |
11.6% |
0.11638955 |
| 2 |
Likely |
269 |
31.9% |
0.31947743 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
264 |
31.4% |
0.31353919 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
95 |
11.3% |
0.11282660 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
75 |
8.9% |
0.08907363 |
| 97 |
No answer |
41 |
4.9% |
0.04869359 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_12
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: Colleagues
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Colleagues
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
83 |
9.9% |
0.09857482 |
| 2 |
Likely |
246 |
29.2% |
0.29216152 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
234 |
27.8% |
0.27790974 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
129 |
15.3% |
0.15320665 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
105 |
12.5% |
0.12470309 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
5.3% |
0.05344418 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt215_13
|
Variable label:
|
Seek information about welfare services: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NAV dispenses various welfare services related to employment, health,
family, pension and social security. If you need information about these
services, where is it likely that you would seek information?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02137767 |
| 2 |
Likely |
58 |
6.9% |
0.06888361 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
206 |
24.5% |
0.24465558 |
| 4 |
Not very likely |
187 |
22.2% |
0.22209026 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
261 |
31.0% |
0.30997625 |
| 97 |
No answer |
112 |
13.3% |
0.13301663 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt216
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Family |
443 |
52.6% |
0.526128266 |
| 2 |
Friends |
219 |
26.0% |
0.260095012 |
| 3 |
Colleagues |
74 |
8.8% |
0.087885986 |
| 4 |
Facebook |
18 |
2.1% |
0.021377672 |
| 5 |
Twitter |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 6 |
Blog |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 7 |
Comment fields in online newspapers |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007125891 |
| 8 |
Politicians |
18 |
2.1% |
0.021377672 |
| 9 |
Media |
13 |
1.5% |
0.015439430 |
| 10 |
Other |
36 |
4.3% |
0.042755344 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.017814727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt216_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service: Other [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_q516_1
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service: Family
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Family
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Family |
634 |
75.3% |
0.752969121 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
201 |
23.9% |
0.238717340 |
w02_q516_2
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service: Friends
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Friends |
490 |
58.2% |
0.581947743 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
345 |
41.0% |
0.409738717 |
w02_q516_3
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service: Colleagues
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Colleagues
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Colleagues |
294 |
34.9% |
0.349168646 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
541 |
64.3% |
0.642517815 |
w02_q516_4
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service: Facebook
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Facebook
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Facebook |
52 |
6.2% |
0.061757720 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
783 |
93.0% |
0.929928741 |
w02_q516_5
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service: Twitter
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Twitter
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Twitter |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
827 |
98.2% |
0.982185273 |
w02_q516_6
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service: Blog
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Blog
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Blog |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
832 |
98.8% |
0.988123515 |
w02_q516_7
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service: Comment
fields in online newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Comment fields in online newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Comment fields in online newspapers |
22 |
2.6% |
0.026128266 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
813 |
96.6% |
0.965558195 |
w02_q516_8
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service: Politicians
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Politicians |
49 |
5.8% |
0.058194774 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
786 |
93.3% |
0.933491686 |
w02_q516_9
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service: Media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Media
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Media |
38 |
4.5% |
0.045130641 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
797 |
94.7% |
0.946555819 |
w02_q516_10
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other |
23 |
2.7% |
0.027315914 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
812 |
96.4% |
0.964370546 |
w02_q516_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Tell someone about negative experience with welfare service [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had a negative experience with a welfare service, who would you
tell?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_dt217_1
|
Variable label:
|
Do or experience the following: Discuss news with others
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you do/experience the following?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Discuss news with others
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
289 |
34.3% |
0.343230404 |
| 2 |
Often |
371 |
44.1% |
0.440617577 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
150 |
17.8% |
0.178147268 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
18 |
2.1% |
0.021377672 |
| 5 |
Never |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002375297 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.014251781 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt217_2
|
Variable label:
|
Do or experience the following: Discuss politics with others
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you do/experience the following?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Discuss politics with others
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
158 |
18.8% |
0.18764846 |
| 2 |
Often |
263 |
31.2% |
0.31235154 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
324 |
38.5% |
0.38479810 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
72 |
8.6% |
0.08551069 |
| 5 |
Never |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01306413 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.7% |
0.01662708 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt217_3
|
Variable label:
|
Do or experience the following: Are asked for advice on politics
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you do/experience the following?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are asked for advice on politics
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02494062 |
| 2 |
Often |
56 |
6.7% |
0.06650831 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
268 |
31.8% |
0.31828979 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
363 |
43.1% |
0.43111639 |
| 5 |
Never |
112 |
13.3% |
0.13301663 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
2.6% |
0.02612827 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt217_4
|
Variable label:
|
Do or experience the following: Share news stories in social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you do/experience the following?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Share news stories in social media
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02256532 |
| 2 |
Often |
50 |
5.9% |
0.05938242 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
165 |
19.6% |
0.19596200 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
218 |
25.9% |
0.25890736 |
| 5 |
Never |
374 |
44.4% |
0.44418052 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01900238 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt217_5
|
Variable label:
|
Do or experience the following: Share political debate contributions in
social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you do/experience the following?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Share political debate contributions in social media
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01306413 |
| 2 |
Often |
26 |
3.1% |
0.03087886 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
96 |
11.4% |
0.11401425 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
213 |
25.3% |
0.25296912 |
| 5 |
Never |
478 |
56.8% |
0.56769596 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02137767 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt217_6
|
Variable label:
|
Do or experience the following: Comment news stories in social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you do/experience the following?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Comment news stories in social media
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
10 |
1.2% |
0.01187648 |
| 2 |
Often |
33 |
3.9% |
0.03919240 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
114 |
13.5% |
0.13539192 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
202 |
24.0% |
0.23990499 |
| 5 |
Never |
467 |
55.5% |
0.55463183 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01900238 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt217_7
|
Variable label:
|
Do or experience the following: Comment political debate contributions
in social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you do/experience the following?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Comment political debate contributions in social media
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01068884 |
| 2 |
Often |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02375297 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
81 |
9.6% |
0.09619952 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
194 |
23.0% |
0.23040380 |
| 5 |
Never |
519 |
61.6% |
0.61638955 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02256532 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt217_8
|
Variable label:
|
Do or experience the following: Write letters to the editor in
newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you do/experience the following?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Write letters to the editor in newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 2 |
Often |
12 |
1.4% |
0.014251781 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
64 |
7.6% |
0.076009501 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
148 |
17.6% |
0.175771971 |
| 5 |
Never |
598 |
71.0% |
0.710213777 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.0% |
0.020190024 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt217_9
|
Variable label:
|
Do or experience the following: Are interviewed by the media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you do/experience the following?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are interviewed by the media
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002375297 |
| 2 |
Often |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007125891 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
58 |
6.9% |
0.068883610 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
179 |
21.3% |
0.212589074 |
| 5 |
Never |
576 |
68.4% |
0.684085511 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.024940618 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt218_1
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence views on issues in politics and society:
Family
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence your views on issues in politics and society?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Family
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
90 |
10.7% |
0.10688836 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
232 |
27.6% |
0.27553444 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
357 |
42.4% |
0.42399050 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
107 |
12.7% |
0.12707838 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
28 |
3.3% |
0.03325416 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
3.3% |
0.03325416 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt218_2
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence views on issues in politics and society:
Friends
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence your views on issues in politics and society?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
46 |
5.5% |
0.05463183 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
217 |
25.8% |
0.25771971 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
389 |
46.2% |
0.46199525 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
132 |
15.7% |
0.15676960 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
34 |
4.0% |
0.04038005 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
2.9% |
0.02850356 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt218_3
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence views on issues in politics and society:
Colleagues
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence your views on issues in politics and society?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Colleagues
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
29 |
3.4% |
0.03444181 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
111 |
13.2% |
0.13182898 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
355 |
42.2% |
0.42161520 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
217 |
25.8% |
0.25771971 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
83 |
9.9% |
0.09857482 |
| 97 |
No answer |
47 |
5.6% |
0.05581948 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt218_4
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence views on issues in politics and society:
Politicians
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence your views on issues in politics and society?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
28 |
3.3% |
0.03325416 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
224 |
26.6% |
0.26603325 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
370 |
43.9% |
0.43942993 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
139 |
16.5% |
0.16508314 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
47 |
5.6% |
0.05581948 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
4.0% |
0.04038005 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt218_5
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence views on issues in politics and society:
Media commentators
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence your views on issues in politics and society?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Media commentators
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
13 |
1.5% |
0.01543943 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
149 |
17.7% |
0.17695962 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
370 |
43.9% |
0.43942993 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
205 |
24.3% |
0.24346793 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
69 |
8.2% |
0.08194774 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
4.3% |
0.04275534 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt218_6
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence views on issues in politics and society:
Newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence your views on issues in politics and society?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02137767 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
202 |
24.0% |
0.23990499 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
395 |
46.9% |
0.46912114 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
149 |
17.7% |
0.17695962 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
45 |
5.3% |
0.05344418 |
| 97 |
No answer |
33 |
3.9% |
0.03919240 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt218_7
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence views on issues in politics and society:
TV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence your views on issues in politics and society?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02019002 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
216 |
25.7% |
0.25653207 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
384 |
45.6% |
0.45605701 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
152 |
18.1% |
0.18052257 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
43 |
5.1% |
0.05106888 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
3.6% |
0.03562945 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt218_8
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence views on issues in politics and society:
Social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence your views on issues in politics and society?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social media
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
56 |
6.7% |
0.066508314 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
186 |
22.1% |
0.220902613 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
238 |
28.3% |
0.282660333 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
309 |
36.7% |
0.366983373 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
5.3% |
0.053444181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt219_1
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence choice of political party: Family
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence which party you vote for in the elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Family
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
39 |
4.6% |
0.04631829 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
92 |
10.9% |
0.10926366 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
259 |
30.8% |
0.30760095 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
249 |
29.6% |
0.29572447 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
167 |
19.8% |
0.19833729 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
4.3% |
0.04275534 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt219_2
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence choice of political party: Friends
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence which party you vote for in the elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02256532 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
62 |
7.4% |
0.07363420 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
227 |
27.0% |
0.26959620 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
293 |
34.8% |
0.34798100 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
207 |
24.6% |
0.24584323 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
4.0% |
0.04038005 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt219_3
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence choice of political party: Colleagues
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence which party you vote for in the elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Colleagues
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
32 |
3.8% |
0.038004751 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
148 |
17.6% |
0.175771971 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
321 |
38.1% |
0.381235154 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
287 |
34.1% |
0.340855107 |
| 97 |
No answer |
47 |
5.6% |
0.055819477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt219_4
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence choice of political party: Politicians
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence which party you vote for in the elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
79 |
9.4% |
0.09382423 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
276 |
32.8% |
0.32779097 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
262 |
31.1% |
0.31116390 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
108 |
12.8% |
0.12826603 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
83 |
9.9% |
0.09857482 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
4.0% |
0.04038005 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt219_5
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence choice of political party: Media
commentators
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence which party you vote for in the elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Media commentators
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01781473 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
118 |
14.0% |
0.14014252 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
271 |
32.2% |
0.32185273 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
244 |
29.0% |
0.28978622 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
157 |
18.6% |
0.18646081 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
4.4% |
0.04394299 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt219_6
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence choice of political party: Newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence which party you vote for in the elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02137767 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
139 |
16.5% |
0.16508314 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
291 |
34.6% |
0.34560570 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
216 |
25.7% |
0.25653207 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
139 |
16.5% |
0.16508314 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
4.6% |
0.04631829 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt219_7
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence choice of political party: TV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence which party you vote for in the elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02375297 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
146 |
17.3% |
0.17339667 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
297 |
35.3% |
0.35273159 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
196 |
23.3% |
0.23277910 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
145 |
17.2% |
0.17220903 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
4.5% |
0.04513064 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt219_8
|
Variable label:
|
The following actors influence choice of political party: Social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say that the following people and stakeholders
influence which party you vote for in the elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social media
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004750594 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
30 |
3.6% |
0.035629454 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
107 |
12.7% |
0.127078385 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
231 |
27.4% |
0.274346793 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
416 |
49.4% |
0.494061758 |
| 97 |
No answer |
54 |
6.4% |
0.064133017 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt226
|
Variable label:
|
Impression of NAV
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01781473 |
| 2 |
Positive |
109 |
12.9% |
0.12945368 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
186 |
22.1% |
0.22090261 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
179 |
21.3% |
0.21258907 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
194 |
23.0% |
0.23040380 |
| 6 |
Negative |
88 |
10.5% |
0.10451306 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
62 |
7.4% |
0.07363420 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01068884 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_1
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Personal experience as user of
services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Personal experience as user of services
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
160 |
19.0% |
0.1900238 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
177 |
21.0% |
0.2102138 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
139 |
16.5% |
0.1650831 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
121 |
14.4% |
0.1437055 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
210 |
24.9% |
0.2494062 |
| 97 |
No answer |
35 |
4.2% |
0.0415677 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_2
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Personal experience from employment
at NAV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Personal experience from employment at NAV
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01900238 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
26 |
3.1% |
0.03087886 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
30 |
3.6% |
0.03562945 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
35 |
4.2% |
0.04156770 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
678 |
80.5% |
0.80522565 |
| 97 |
No answer |
57 |
6.8% |
0.06769596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_3
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Family members’ experiences as users
of services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Family members’ experiences as users of services
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
100 |
11.9% |
0.11876485 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
162 |
19.2% |
0.19239905 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
226 |
26.8% |
0.26840855 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
110 |
13.1% |
0.13064133 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
201 |
23.9% |
0.23871734 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
5.1% |
0.05106888 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_4
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Family members’ experiences from
employment at NAV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Family members’ experiences from employment at NAV
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01306413 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
35 |
4.2% |
0.04156770 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
71 |
8.4% |
0.08432304 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
51 |
6.1% |
0.06057007 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
617 |
73.3% |
0.73277910 |
| 97 |
No answer |
57 |
6.8% |
0.06769596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_5
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Friends’ experience as users of
services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends’ experience as users of services
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
56 |
6.7% |
0.06650831 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
151 |
17.9% |
0.17933492 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
258 |
30.6% |
0.30641330 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
147 |
17.5% |
0.17458432 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
185 |
22.0% |
0.21971496 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
5.3% |
0.05344418 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_6
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Friends’ experiences from employment
at NAV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends’ experiences from employment at NAV
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02019002 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
46 |
5.5% |
0.05463183 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
80 |
9.5% |
0.09501188 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
78 |
9.3% |
0.09263658 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
560 |
66.5% |
0.66508314 |
| 97 |
No answer |
61 |
7.2% |
0.07244656 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_7
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Political debate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political debate
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02494062 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
118 |
14.0% |
0.14014252 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
360 |
42.8% |
0.42755344 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
188 |
22.3% |
0.22327791 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
115 |
13.7% |
0.13657957 |
| 97 |
No answer |
40 |
4.8% |
0.04750594 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_8
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: TV news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV news
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
35 |
4.2% |
0.04156770 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
179 |
21.3% |
0.21258907 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
360 |
42.8% |
0.42755344 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
158 |
18.8% |
0.18764846 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
71 |
8.4% |
0.08432304 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
4.6% |
0.04631829 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_9
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: National newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
National newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
38 |
4.5% |
0.04513064 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
156 |
18.5% |
0.18527316 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
337 |
40.0% |
0.40023753 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
161 |
19.1% |
0.19121140 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
101 |
12.0% |
0.11995249 |
| 97 |
No answer |
49 |
5.8% |
0.05819477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_10
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Local and regional newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Local and regional newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
35 |
4.2% |
0.04156770 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
97 |
11.5% |
0.11520190 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
306 |
36.3% |
0.36342043 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
199 |
23.6% |
0.23634204 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
156 |
18.5% |
0.18527316 |
| 97 |
No answer |
49 |
5.8% |
0.05819477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_11
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Facebook
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Facebook
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
10 |
1.2% |
0.01187648 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
28 |
3.3% |
0.03325416 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
76 |
9.0% |
0.09026128 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
139 |
16.5% |
0.16508314 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
531 |
63.1% |
0.63064133 |
| 97 |
No answer |
58 |
6.9% |
0.06888361 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_12
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Twitter
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Twitter
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001187648 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007125891 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
23 |
2.7% |
0.027315914 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
76 |
9.0% |
0.090261283 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
680 |
80.8% |
0.807600950 |
| 97 |
No answer |
56 |
6.7% |
0.066508314 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_13
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Blogs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Blogs
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002375297 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005938242 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
28 |
3.3% |
0.033254157 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
75 |
8.9% |
0.089073634 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
675 |
80.2% |
0.801662708 |
| 97 |
No answer |
57 |
6.8% |
0.067695962 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_14
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Comment fields in online newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Comment fields in online newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004750594 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
17 |
2.0% |
0.020190024 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
89 |
10.6% |
0.105700713 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
129 |
15.3% |
0.153206651 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
547 |
65.0% |
0.649643705 |
| 97 |
No answer |
56 |
6.7% |
0.066508314 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt220_15
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence view of NAV: Discussion forums
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your view of NAV is influenced by the
following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Discussion forums
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
31 |
3.7% |
0.036817102 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
114 |
13.5% |
0.135391924 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
126 |
15.0% |
0.149643705 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
505 |
60.0% |
0.599762470 |
| 97 |
No answer |
59 |
7.0% |
0.070071259 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_1
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Personal experience
as a patient
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Personal experience as a patient
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
326 |
38.7% |
0.38717340 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
257 |
30.5% |
0.30522565 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
110 |
13.1% |
0.13064133 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
44 |
5.2% |
0.05225653 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
75 |
8.9% |
0.08907363 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
3.6% |
0.03562945 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_2
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Personal experience
from employment at the hospital
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Personal experience from employment at the hospital
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
46 |
5.5% |
0.05463183 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
58 |
6.9% |
0.06888361 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
43 |
5.1% |
0.05106888 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
24 |
2.9% |
0.02850356 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
606 |
72.0% |
0.71971496 |
| 97 |
No answer |
65 |
7.7% |
0.07719715 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_3
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Family members’
experience as patients
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Family members’ experience as patients
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
194 |
23.0% |
0.23040380 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
339 |
40.3% |
0.40261283 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
177 |
21.0% |
0.21021378 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
38 |
4.5% |
0.04513064 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
56 |
6.7% |
0.06650831 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
4.5% |
0.04513064 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_4
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Family members’
experience from employment at the hospital
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Family members’ experience from employment at the hospital
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
42 |
5.0% |
0.04988124 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
84 |
10.0% |
0.09976247 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
85 |
10.1% |
0.10095012 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
58 |
6.9% |
0.06888361 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
506 |
60.1% |
0.60095012 |
| 97 |
No answer |
67 |
8.0% |
0.07957245 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_5
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Friends’ experience
as patients
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends’ experience as patients
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
111 |
13.2% |
0.13182898 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
257 |
30.5% |
0.30522565 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
269 |
31.9% |
0.31947743 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
84 |
10.0% |
0.09976247 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
81 |
9.6% |
0.09619952 |
| 97 |
No answer |
40 |
4.8% |
0.04750594 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_6
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Friends’ experience
from employment at the hospital
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Friends’ experience from employment at the hospital
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
37 |
4.4% |
0.04394299 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
90 |
10.7% |
0.10688836 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
160 |
19.0% |
0.19002375 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
61 |
7.2% |
0.07244656 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
428 |
50.8% |
0.50831354 |
| 97 |
No answer |
66 |
7.8% |
0.07838480 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_7
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Political debate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political debate
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02019002 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
121 |
14.4% |
0.14370546 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
314 |
37.3% |
0.37292162 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
188 |
22.3% |
0.22327791 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
157 |
18.6% |
0.18646081 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
5.3% |
0.05344418 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_8
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: TV news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV news
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
25 |
3.0% |
0.02969121 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
152 |
18.1% |
0.18052257 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
324 |
38.5% |
0.38479810 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
170 |
20.2% |
0.20190024 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
126 |
15.0% |
0.14964371 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
5.3% |
0.05344418 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_9
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: National newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
National newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
25 |
3.0% |
0.02969121 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
124 |
14.7% |
0.14726841 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
297 |
35.3% |
0.35273159 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
191 |
22.7% |
0.22684086 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
152 |
18.1% |
0.18052257 |
| 97 |
No answer |
53 |
6.3% |
0.06294537 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_10
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Local and regional
newspapers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Local and regional newspapers
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
27 |
3.2% |
0.03206651 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
141 |
16.7% |
0.16745843 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
319 |
37.9% |
0.37885986 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
167 |
19.8% |
0.19833729 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
138 |
16.4% |
0.16389549 |
| 97 |
No answer |
50 |
5.9% |
0.05938242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_11
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Facebook
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Facebook
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007125891 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
18 |
2.1% |
0.021377672 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
68 |
8.1% |
0.080760095 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
120 |
14.3% |
0.142517815 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
565 |
67.1% |
0.671021378 |
| 97 |
No answer |
65 |
7.7% |
0.077197150 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_12
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Twitter
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Twitter
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002375297 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005938242 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
27 |
3.2% |
0.032066508 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
74 |
8.8% |
0.087885986 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
669 |
79.5% |
0.794536817 |
| 97 |
No answer |
65 |
7.7% |
0.077197150 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_13
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Blogs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Blogs
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
26 |
3.1% |
0.030878860 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
71 |
8.4% |
0.084323040 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
674 |
80.0% |
0.800475059 |
| 97 |
No answer |
65 |
7.7% |
0.077197150 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_14
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Local and regional
newspapersKommentarfelt på nettaviser
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Local and regional newspapersKommentarfelt på nettaviser
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
13 |
1.5% |
0.015439430 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
67 |
8.0% |
0.079572447 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
106 |
12.6% |
0.125890736 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
589 |
70.0% |
0.699524941 |
| 97 |
No answer |
64 |
7.6% |
0.076009501 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt221_15
|
Variable label:
|
Factors that influence confidence in local hospital: Discussion forums
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent would you say your confidence in your local hospital is
influenced by the following factors?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Discussion forums
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
26 |
3.1% |
0.030878860 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
85 |
10.1% |
0.100950119 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
106 |
12.6% |
0.125890736 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
554 |
65.8% |
0.657957245 |
| 97 |
No answer |
68 |
8.1% |
0.080760095 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt222_1
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is the influence of the media on political opinion in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong do you think the influence of the media is on political
opinion in Norway, and how strong should it be?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strong the influence is
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong |
133 |
15.8% |
0.157957245 |
| 2 |
Strong |
354 |
42.0% |
0.420427553 |
| 3 |
Somewhat strong |
249 |
29.6% |
0.295724466 |
| 4 |
Neither strong nor weak |
76 |
9.0% |
0.090261283 |
| 5 |
Somewhat weak |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 6 |
Weak |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 7 |
Very weak |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002375297 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.4% |
0.023752969 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt222_2
|
Variable label:
|
How strong should the influence of the media on political opinion in
Norway be
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong do you think the influence of the media is on political
opinion in Norway, and how strong should it be?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strong it should be
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02375297 |
| 2 |
Strong |
128 |
15.2% |
0.15201900 |
| 3 |
Somewhat strong |
300 |
35.6% |
0.35629454 |
| 4 |
Neither strong nor weak |
296 |
35.2% |
0.35154394 |
| 5 |
Somewhat weak |
42 |
5.0% |
0.04988124 |
| 6 |
Weak |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02375297 |
| 7 |
Very weak |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01425178 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
2.9% |
0.02850356 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_u1_s2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 and S=2 into three groups and selects one of the
following questions: DT223a-DT223c
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:831] [Invalid:2541]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
250 |
30.1% |
0.3008424 |
| 2 |
2 |
285 |
34.3% |
0.3429603 |
| 3 |
3 |
296 |
35.6% |
0.3561974 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2541 |
|
NA |
w02_dt223a
|
Variable label:
|
258 300 patients in health queues, Norwegian health service efficiency
service in terms of treatment time
|
|
Literal question:
|
Around 258,300 patients are in health queues in the Norwegian health
service. How efficient do you think the Norwegian health service is in
terms of treatment time?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very efficient |
3 |
1.2% |
0.012 |
| 2 |
Efficient |
32 |
12.8% |
0.128 |
| 3 |
Somewhat efficient |
86 |
34.4% |
0.344 |
| 4 |
Not very efficient |
105 |
42.0% |
0.420 |
| 5 |
Not efficient at all |
20 |
8.0% |
0.080 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.6% |
0.016 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3122 |
|
NA |
w02_dt223b
|
Variable label:
|
258 300 patients waiting for treatment, Norwegian health service
efficiency service in terms of treatment time
|
|
Literal question:
|
Around 258,300 patients are waiting for treatment by the Norwegian
health service. How efficient do you think the Norwegian health service
is in terms of treatment time?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very efficient |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02105263 |
| 2 |
Efficient |
25 |
8.8% |
0.08771930 |
| 3 |
Somewhat efficient |
94 |
33.0% |
0.32982456 |
| 4 |
Not very efficient |
127 |
44.6% |
0.44561404 |
| 5 |
Not efficient at all |
29 |
10.2% |
0.10175439 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01403509 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3087 |
|
NA |
w02_dt223c
|
Variable label:
|
Norwegian health service efficiency service in terms of treatment time
|
|
Literal question:
|
How efficient do you think the Norwegian health service is in terms of
treatment time?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very efficient |
4 |
1.4% |
0.013513514 |
| 2 |
Efficient |
55 |
18.6% |
0.185810811 |
| 3 |
Somewhat efficient |
124 |
41.9% |
0.418918919 |
| 4 |
Not very efficient |
94 |
31.8% |
0.317567568 |
| 5 |
Not efficient at all |
17 |
5.7% |
0.057432432 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3076 |
|
NA |
w02_dt224
|
Variable label:
|
Experience with the Norwegian health service
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have experience with the Norwegian health service?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, as a patient |
273 |
32.4% |
0.32422803 |
| 2 |
Yes, as next of kin |
135 |
16.0% |
0.16033254 |
| 3 |
Yes, both as next of kin and a patient |
364 |
43.2% |
0.43230404 |
| 4 |
No |
54 |
6.4% |
0.06413302 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01900238 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2530 |
|
NA |
w02_dt225
|
Variable label:
|
Longest waiting time for treatment
|
|
Literal question:
|
What would you estimate is the longest you have waited for treatment?
(e.g. waited for an operation at a hospital.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Have not waited for treatment |
129 |
20.3% |
0.20251177 |
| 2 |
Less than 1 day |
31 |
4.9% |
0.04866562 |
| 3 |
Up to 1 week |
25 |
3.9% |
0.03924647 |
| 4 |
Up to 1 week |
70 |
11.0% |
0.10989011 |
| 5 |
1-2 months |
111 |
17.4% |
0.17425432 |
| 6 |
3-5 months |
121 |
19.0% |
0.18995290 |
| 7 |
About six months |
59 |
9.3% |
0.09262166 |
| 8 |
7-11 months |
34 |
5.3% |
0.05337520 |
| 9 |
One year or more |
50 |
7.8% |
0.07849294 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.1% |
0.01098901 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2735 |
|
NA |
w02_km223abc_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Technological innovations will solve the climate issues
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will solve the climate issues.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
44 |
2.7% |
0.02661827 |
| 2 |
Agree |
197 |
11.9% |
0.11917725 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
624 |
37.7% |
0.37749546 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
340 |
20.6% |
0.20568663 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
213 |
12.9% |
0.12885662 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
165 |
10.0% |
0.09981851 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
42 |
2.5% |
0.02540835 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
1.7% |
0.01693890 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_km223abc_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: We should not allow oil and gas exploitation in the area
around Lofoten and Vesterålen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them:
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas exploitation in the area around Lofoten
and Vesterålen.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
358 |
21.7% |
0.21657592 |
| 2 |
Agree |
303 |
18.3% |
0.18330309 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
201 |
12.2% |
0.12159710 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
271 |
16.4% |
0.16394434 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
200 |
12.1% |
0.12099214 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
183 |
11.1% |
0.11070780 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
116 |
7.0% |
0.07017544 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.3% |
0.01270417 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_km223abc_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Inhabitants in rich countries such as Norway should reduce
their consumption as a part of solving the climate challenge
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Inhabitants in rich countries such as Norway should reduce their
consumption as a part of solving the climate challenge.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
299 |
18.1% |
0.180883243 |
| 2 |
Agree |
404 |
24.4% |
0.244404114 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
458 |
27.7% |
0.277071990 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
189 |
11.4% |
0.114337568 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
129 |
7.8% |
0.078039927 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
107 |
6.5% |
0.064730792 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
53 |
3.2% |
0.032062916 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008469449 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_dv201ac_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Tax rates should be lowered, even if it leads to cutbacks in
the welfare state
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tax rates should be lowered, even if it leads to cutbacks in the welfare
state.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
53 |
3.2% |
0.03206292 |
| 2 |
Agree |
129 |
7.8% |
0.07803993 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
264 |
16.0% |
0.15970962 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
202 |
12.2% |
0.12220206 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
292 |
17.7% |
0.17664852 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
386 |
23.4% |
0.23351482 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
288 |
17.4% |
0.17422868 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
2.4% |
0.02359347 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_dv201ac_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Commercial private schools should be permitted
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Commercial private schools should be permitted.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
104 |
6.3% |
0.06291591 |
| 2 |
Agree |
288 |
17.4% |
0.17422868 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
327 |
19.8% |
0.19782214 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
238 |
14.4% |
0.14398064 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
203 |
12.3% |
0.12280702 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
233 |
14.1% |
0.14095584 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
224 |
13.6% |
0.13551119 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
2.2% |
0.02177858 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_dv201ac_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Many public services could be carried out both better and
cheaper if they were left to private parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Many public services could be carried out both better and cheaper if
they were left to private parties.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
134 |
8.1% |
0.08106473 |
| 2 |
Agree |
275 |
16.6% |
0.16636419 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
397 |
24.0% |
0.24016939 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
190 |
11.5% |
0.11494253 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
223 |
13.5% |
0.13490623 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
243 |
14.7% |
0.14700544 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
155 |
9.4% |
0.09376891 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
2.2% |
0.02177858 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_dv202ac_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees should have the same right to social services as
Norwegians, even if they are not Norwegian citizens
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees should have the same right to social services as Norwegians,
even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
90 |
5.4% |
0.05444646 |
| 2 |
Agree |
262 |
15.8% |
0.15849970 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
295 |
17.8% |
0.17846340 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
167 |
10.1% |
0.10102843 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
340 |
20.6% |
0.20568663 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
283 |
17.1% |
0.17120387 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
197 |
11.9% |
0.11917725 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_dv202ac_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Begging should be banned in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be banned in Norway.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
460 |
27.8% |
0.278281912 |
| 2 |
Agree |
400 |
24.2% |
0.241984271 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
250 |
15.1% |
0.151240169 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
193 |
11.7% |
0.116757411 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
154 |
9.3% |
0.093163944 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
115 |
7.0% |
0.069570478 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
65 |
3.9% |
0.039322444 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.0% |
0.009679371 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_dv202ac_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norway will lose its identity if more Muslims come to live
here
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree
with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway will lose its identity if more Muslims come to live here.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
197 |
11.9% |
0.11917725 |
| 2 |
Agree |
187 |
11.3% |
0.11312765 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
325 |
19.7% |
0.19661222 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
264 |
16.0% |
0.15970962 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
186 |
11.3% |
0.11252269 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
298 |
18.0% |
0.18027828 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
181 |
10.9% |
0.10949788 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
0.9% |
0.00907441 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_s
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into two groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into two groups (U2 and U2 S1-S2)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1650] [Invalid:1722]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
825 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| 2 |
2 |
825 |
50.0% |
0.5 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1722 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_s2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Randomiserer dersom U=2 og S=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U = 2 and S = 2 into two groups and selects one of the
following questions: DV205a/DV205b
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:825] [Invalid:2547]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
396 |
48.0% |
0.48 |
| 2 |
2 |
429 |
52.0% |
0.52 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_dv205a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Public responsibility to reduce income inequality between rich and poor
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some believe that the authorities should do everything they can to
reduce income inequalities between the rich and poor. Others believe
that this is not the responsibility of the authorities, but that each
individual must take responsibility for themselves. What is your
opinion?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - This is not the authorities responsibility at all |
11 |
2.8% |
0.027777778 |
| 2 |
1 |
12 |
3.0% |
0.030303030 |
| 3 |
2 |
26 |
6.6% |
0.065656566 |
| 4 |
3 |
38 |
9.6% |
0.095959596 |
| 5 |
4 |
34 |
8.6% |
0.085858586 |
| 6 |
5 |
62 |
15.7% |
0.156565657 |
| 7 |
6 |
40 |
10.1% |
0.101010101 |
| 8 |
7 |
74 |
18.7% |
0.186868687 |
| 9 |
8 |
43 |
10.9% |
0.108585859 |
| 10 |
9 |
24 |
6.1% |
0.060606061 |
| 11 |
10 - The authorities should do all they can |
30 |
7.6% |
0.075757576 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005050505 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2976 |
|
NA |
w02_dv205b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Public responsibility to reduce income inequality between the majority
population and minority groups
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some believe that the authorities should do everything they can to
reduce income inequalities between the majority population and minority
groups. Others believe that this is not the responsibility of the
authorities, but that each individual must take responsibility for
themselves. What is your opinion?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - This is not the authorities responsibility at all |
37 |
8.6% |
0.08624709 |
| 2 |
1 |
23 |
5.4% |
0.05361305 |
| 3 |
2 |
36 |
8.4% |
0.08391608 |
| 4 |
3 |
52 |
12.1% |
0.12121212 |
| 5 |
4 |
40 |
9.3% |
0.09324009 |
| 6 |
5 |
72 |
16.8% |
0.16783217 |
| 7 |
6 |
59 |
13.8% |
0.13752914 |
| 8 |
7 |
52 |
12.1% |
0.12121212 |
| 9 |
8 |
19 |
4.4% |
0.04428904 |
| 10 |
9 |
14 |
3.3% |
0.03263403 |
| 11 |
10 - The authorities should do all they can |
17 |
4.0% |
0.03962704 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.9% |
0.01864802 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2943 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_s2_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2 and S=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U = 2 and S = 2 into four groups and selcts one of the
following questions: DV206a - DV206d
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:825] [Invalid:2547]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
202 |
24.5% |
0.2448485 |
| 2 |
2 |
238 |
28.8% |
0.2884848 |
| 3 |
3 |
194 |
23.5% |
0.2351515 |
| 4 |
4 |
191 |
23.2% |
0.2315152 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_dv206a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree or disagree: Norway spends too much welfare funds on poor families
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree that Norway spends too much
welfare funds on poor families?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
9 |
4.5% |
0.04455446 |
| 2 |
Agree |
18 |
8.9% |
0.08910891 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
26 |
12.9% |
0.12871287 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
46 |
22.8% |
0.22772277 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
35 |
17.3% |
0.17326733 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
38 |
18.8% |
0.18811881 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
26 |
12.9% |
0.12871287 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.0% |
0.01980198 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3170 |
|
NA |
w02_dv206b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree or disagree: Norway spends too much welfare funds on minority
families
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree that Norway spends too much
welfare funds on ethnic minority families?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
18 |
7.6% |
0.075630252 |
| 2 |
Agree |
28 |
11.8% |
0.117647059 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
56 |
23.5% |
0.235294118 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
53 |
22.3% |
0.222689076 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
39 |
16.4% |
0.163865546 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
30 |
12.6% |
0.126050420 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
13 |
5.5% |
0.054621849 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004201681 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3134 |
|
NA |
w02_dv206c
|
Variable label:
|
Agree or disagree: Norway spends too much welfare funds on immigrant
families
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree that Norway spends too much
welfare funds on immigrant families?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
7.2% |
0.072164948 |
| 2 |
Agree |
22 |
11.3% |
0.113402062 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
55 |
28.4% |
0.283505155 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
47 |
24.2% |
0.242268041 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
18 |
9.3% |
0.092783505 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
28 |
14.4% |
0.144329897 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
4.6% |
0.046391753 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005154639 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3178 |
|
NA |
w02_dv206d
|
Variable label:
|
Agree or disagree: Norway spends too much welfare funds on immigrant
families who have become Norwegian citizens
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree that Norway spends too much
welfare funds on immigrant families who have become Norwegian citizens?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
7.3% |
0.07329843 |
| 2 |
Agree |
26 |
13.6% |
0.13612565 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
52 |
27.2% |
0.27225131 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
46 |
24.1% |
0.24083770 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
19 |
9.9% |
0.09947644 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
24 |
12.6% |
0.12565445 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
4.2% |
0.04188482 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.0% |
0.01047120 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3181 |
|
NA |
w02_dv222
|
Variable label:
|
Political party with the best immigration policy
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which party has the best immigration policy?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
76 |
4.6% |
0.045977011 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
346 |
20.9% |
0.209316394 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
411 |
24.9% |
0.248638838 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
124 |
7.5% |
0.075015124 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
121 |
7.3% |
0.073200242 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
19 |
1.1% |
0.011494253 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
11 |
0.7% |
0.006654567 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
357 |
21.6% |
0.215970962 |
| 9 |
Red |
29 |
1.8% |
0.017543860 |
| 10 |
Other: |
54 |
3.3% |
0.032667877 |
| 97 |
No answer |
105 |
6.4% |
0.063520871 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_dv222_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Political party with the best immigration policy [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which party has the best immigration policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_u2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U = 2 into eight groups and selects one of the following
questions: DT202a-DT202h
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1650] [Invalid:1722]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
210 |
12.7% |
0.1272727 |
| 2 |
2 |
218 |
13.2% |
0.1321212 |
| 3 |
3 |
206 |
12.5% |
0.1248485 |
| 4 |
4 |
194 |
11.8% |
0.1175758 |
| 5 |
5 |
204 |
12.4% |
0.1236364 |
| 6 |
6 |
195 |
11.8% |
0.1181818 |
| 7 |
7 |
205 |
12.4% |
0.1242424 |
| 8 |
8 |
218 |
13.2% |
0.1321212 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1722 |
|
NA |
w02_dt202a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Requested to do voluntary work for a couple of evenings: for the local
Red Cross
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for a couple
of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for the local Red Cross.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
38 |
18.1% |
0.18095238 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
109 |
51.9% |
0.51904762 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
40 |
19.0% |
0.19047619 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
9 |
4.3% |
0.04285714 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.4% |
0.02380952 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3162 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
9 |
4.3% |
0.04285714 |
w02_dt202a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Requested to do voluntary work for a couple of evenings: for a local
sports association
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for a couple
of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a local sports association.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
41 |
19.5% |
0.19523810 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
96 |
45.7% |
0.45714286 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
41 |
19.5% |
0.19523810 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
15 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.3% |
0.03333333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3162 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
10 |
4.8% |
0.04761905 |
w02_dt202a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Requested to do voluntary work for a couple of evenings: for a municipal
service for children and young people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for a couple
of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for children and young people.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
41 |
19.5% |
0.19523810 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
108 |
51.4% |
0.51428571 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
40 |
19.0% |
0.19047619 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
5 |
2.4% |
0.02380952 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.9% |
0.02857143 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3162 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
10 |
4.8% |
0.04761905 |
w02_dt202a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Requested to do voluntary work for a couple of evenings: for a municipal
service for the elderly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for a couple
of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for the elderly.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
39 |
18.6% |
0.18571429 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
106 |
50.5% |
0.50476190 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
43 |
20.5% |
0.20476190 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
11 |
5.2% |
0.05238095 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01428571 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3162 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
8 |
3.8% |
0.03809524 |
w02_dt202b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Requested to do voluntary work for one hour a week for the next year:
for the local Red Cross
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for one hour
a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for the local Red Cross.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
46 |
21.1% |
0.21100917 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
76 |
34.9% |
0.34862385 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
39 |
17.9% |
0.17889908 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
13 |
6.0% |
0.05963303 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
9.2% |
0.09174312 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3154 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
24 |
11.0% |
0.11009174 |
w02_dt202b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Requested to do voluntary work for one hour a week for the next year:
for a local sports association
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for one hour
a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a local sports association.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
37 |
17.0% |
0.16972477 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
67 |
30.7% |
0.30733945 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
44 |
20.2% |
0.20183486 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
27 |
12.4% |
0.12385321 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
11.5% |
0.11467890 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3154 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
18 |
8.3% |
0.08256881 |
w02_dt202b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Requested to do voluntary work for one hour a week for the next year:
for a municipal service for children and young people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for one hour
a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for children and young people.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
47 |
21.6% |
0.21559633 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
80 |
36.7% |
0.36697248 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
36 |
16.5% |
0.16513761 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
13 |
6.0% |
0.05963303 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
10.1% |
0.10091743 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3154 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
20 |
9.2% |
0.09174312 |
w02_dt202b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Requested to do voluntary work for one hour a week for the next year:
for a municipal service for the elderly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for one hour
a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for the elderly.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
52 |
23.9% |
0.23853211 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
82 |
37.6% |
0.37614679 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
35 |
16.1% |
0.16055046 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
18 |
8.3% |
0.08256881 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
6.0% |
0.05963303 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3154 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
18 |
8.3% |
0.08256881 |
w02_dt202c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Good to have a reference of participation, requested to do voluntary
work for a couple of evenings: for the local Red Cross
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many believe that one can strengthen one’s qualifications by taking on
voluntary work or that it is good to have a reference that one has
participated in voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you
to do voluntary work for a couple of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for the local Red Cross.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
48 |
23.3% |
0.23300971 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
94 |
45.6% |
0.45631068 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
32 |
15.5% |
0.15533981 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
8 |
3.9% |
0.03883495 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
3.9% |
0.03883495 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3166 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
16 |
7.8% |
0.07766990 |
w02_dt202c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Good to have a reference of participation, requested to do voluntary
work for a couple of evenings: for a local sports association
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many believe that one can strengthen one’s qualifications by taking on
voluntary work or that it is good to have a reference that one has
participated in voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you
to do voluntary work for a couple of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a local sports association.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
38 |
18.4% |
0.18446602 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
77 |
37.4% |
0.37378641 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
49 |
23.8% |
0.23786408 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
14 |
6.8% |
0.06796117 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
6.8% |
0.06796117 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3166 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
14 |
6.8% |
0.06796117 |
w02_dt202c_3
|
Variable label:
|
Good to have a reference of participation, requested to do voluntary
work for a couple of evenings: for a municipal service for children and
young people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many believe that one can strengthen one’s qualifications by taking on
voluntary work or that it is good to have a reference that one has
participated in voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you
to do voluntary work for a couple of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for children and young people.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
44 |
21.4% |
0.21359223 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
96 |
46.6% |
0.46601942 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
28 |
13.6% |
0.13592233 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
9 |
4.4% |
0.04368932 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
5.3% |
0.05339806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3166 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
18 |
8.7% |
0.08737864 |
w02_dt202c_4
|
Variable label:
|
Good to have a reference of participation, requested to do voluntary
work for a couple of evenings: for a municipal service for the elderly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many believe that one can strengthen one’s qualifications by taking on
voluntary work or that it is good to have a reference that one has
participated in voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you
to do voluntary work for a couple of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for the elderly.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
41 |
19.9% |
0.199029126 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
86 |
41.7% |
0.417475728 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
48 |
23.3% |
0.233009709 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
2 |
1.0% |
0.009708738 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
3.9% |
0.038834951 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3166 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
21 |
10.2% |
0.101941748 |
w02_dt202d_1
|
Variable label:
|
Good to have a reference of participation, requested to do voluntary
work for one one hour a week for the next year: for the local Red Cross
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many believe that one can strengthen one’s qualifications by taking on
voluntary work or that it is good to have a reference that one has
participated in voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you
to do voluntary work for one hour a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for the local Red Cross.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
30 |
15.5% |
0.15463918 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
91 |
46.9% |
0.46907216 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
31 |
16.0% |
0.15979381 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
9 |
4.6% |
0.04639175 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
4.6% |
0.04639175 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3178 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
24 |
12.4% |
0.12371134 |
w02_dt202d_2
|
Variable label:
|
Good to have a reference of participation, requested to do voluntary
work for one one hour a week for the next year: for a local sports
association
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many believe that one can strengthen one’s qualifications by taking on
voluntary work or that it is good to have a reference that one has
participated in voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you
to do voluntary work for one hour a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a local sports association.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
34 |
17.5% |
0.17525773 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
71 |
36.6% |
0.36597938 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
36 |
18.6% |
0.18556701 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
20 |
10.3% |
0.10309278 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
8.2% |
0.08247423 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3178 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
17 |
8.8% |
0.08762887 |
w02_dt202d_3
|
Variable label:
|
Good to have a reference of participation, requested to do voluntary
work for one one hour a week for the next year: for a municipal service
for children and young people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many believe that one can strengthen one’s qualifications by taking on
voluntary work or that it is good to have a reference that one has
participated in voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you
to do voluntary work for one hour a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for children and young people.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
31 |
16.0% |
0.15979381 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
82 |
42.3% |
0.42268041 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
36 |
18.6% |
0.18556701 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
6 |
3.1% |
0.03092784 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
6.7% |
0.06701031 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3178 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
26 |
13.4% |
0.13402062 |
w02_dt202d_4
|
Variable label:
|
Good to have a reference of participation, requested to do voluntary
work for one one hour a week for the next year: for a municipal service
for the elderly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many believe that one can strengthen one’s qualifications by taking on
voluntary work or that it is good to have a reference that one has
participated in voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you
to do voluntary work for one hour a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for the elderly.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
28 |
14.4% |
0.14432990 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
78 |
40.2% |
0.40206186 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
44 |
22.7% |
0.22680412 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
10 |
5.2% |
0.05154639 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
5.7% |
0.05670103 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3178 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
23 |
11.9% |
0.11855670 |
w02_dt202e_1
|
Variable label:
|
Wish to improve local community, requested to do voluntary work for a
couple of evenings: for the local Red Cross
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many participate in voluntary work because they are committed to a cause
or because they wish to make their local community a better place to
live. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for a
couple of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for the local Red Cross.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
38 |
18.6% |
0.18627451 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
80 |
39.2% |
0.39215686 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
41 |
20.1% |
0.20098039 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
9 |
4.4% |
0.04411765 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3168 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
24 |
11.8% |
0.11764706 |
w02_dt202e_2
|
Variable label:
|
Wish to improve local community, requested to do voluntary work for a
couple of evenings: for a local sports association
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many participate in voluntary work because they are committed to a cause
or because they wish to make their local community a better place to
live. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for a
couple of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a local sports association.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
37 |
18.1% |
0.18137255 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
66 |
32.4% |
0.32352941 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
50 |
24.5% |
0.24509804 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
26 |
12.7% |
0.12745098 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
6.4% |
0.06372549 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3168 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
12 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
w02_dt202e_3
|
Variable label:
|
Wish to improve local community, requested to do voluntary work for a
couple of evenings: for a municipal service for children and young
people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many participate in voluntary work because they are committed to a cause
or because they wish to make their local community a better place to
live. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for a
couple of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for children and young people.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
47 |
23.0% |
0.23039216 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
73 |
35.8% |
0.35784314 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
40 |
19.6% |
0.19607843 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
13 |
6.4% |
0.06372549 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
4.4% |
0.04411765 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3168 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
22 |
10.8% |
0.10784314 |
w02_dt202e_4
|
Variable label:
|
Wish to improve local community, requested to do voluntary work for a
couple of evenings: for a municipal service for the elderly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many participate in voluntary work because they are committed to a cause
or because they wish to make their local community a better place to
live. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for a
couple of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for the elderly.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
42 |
20.6% |
0.20588235 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
90 |
44.1% |
0.44117647 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
36 |
17.6% |
0.17647059 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
14 |
6.9% |
0.06862745 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01470588 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3168 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
19 |
9.3% |
0.09313725 |
w02_dt202f_1
|
Variable label:
|
Wish to improve local community, requested to do voluntary work for one
one hour a week for the next year: for the local Red Cross
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many participate in voluntary work because they are committed to a cause
or because they wish to make their local community a better place to
live. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for
one hour a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for the local Red Cross.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
35 |
17.9% |
0.17948718 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
74 |
37.9% |
0.37948718 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
36 |
18.5% |
0.18461538 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
11 |
5.6% |
0.05641026 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
8.7% |
0.08717949 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3177 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
22 |
11.3% |
0.11282051 |
w02_dt202f_2
|
Variable label:
|
Wish to improve local community, requested to do voluntary work for one
one hour a week for the next year: for a local sports association
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many participate in voluntary work because they are committed to a cause
or because they wish to make their local community a better place to
live. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for
one hour a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a local sports association.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
35 |
17.9% |
0.17948718 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
57 |
29.2% |
0.29230769 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
40 |
20.5% |
0.20512821 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
32 |
16.4% |
0.16410256 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09230769 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3177 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
13 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
w02_dt202f_3
|
Variable label:
|
Wish to improve local community, requested to do voluntary work for one
one hour a week for the next year: for a municipal service for children
and young people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many participate in voluntary work because they are committed to a cause
or because they wish to make their local community a better place to
live. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for
one hour a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for children and young people.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
33 |
16.9% |
0.16923077 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
89 |
45.6% |
0.45641026 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
35 |
17.9% |
0.17948718 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
12 |
6.2% |
0.06153846 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
5.6% |
0.05641026 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3177 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
15 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
w02_dt202f_4
|
Variable label:
|
Wish to improve local community, requested to do voluntary work for one
one hour a week for the next year: for a municipal service for the
elderly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many participate in voluntary work because they are committed to a cause
or because they wish to make their local community a better place to
live. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary work for
one hour a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for the elderly.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
40 |
20.5% |
0.20512821 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
71 |
36.4% |
0.36410256 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
38 |
19.5% |
0.19487179 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09230769 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
5.1% |
0.05128205 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3177 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09230769 |
w02_dt202g_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling useful and valued with participation, requested to do voluntary
work for a couple of evenings: for the local Red Cross
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many feel more useful, significant and valued when they participate in
voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary
work for a couple of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for the local Red Cross.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
37 |
18.0% |
0.18048780 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
86 |
42.0% |
0.41951220 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
36 |
17.6% |
0.17560976 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
10 |
4.9% |
0.04878049 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
5.9% |
0.05853659 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3167 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
24 |
11.7% |
0.11707317 |
w02_dt202g_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling useful and valued with participation, requested to do voluntary
work for a couple of evenings: for a local sports association
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many feel more useful, significant and valued when they participate in
voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary
work for a couple of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a local sports association.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
40 |
19.5% |
0.19512195 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
80 |
39.0% |
0.39024390 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
38 |
18.5% |
0.18536585 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
19 |
9.3% |
0.09268293 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
4.4% |
0.04390244 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3167 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
19 |
9.3% |
0.09268293 |
w02_dt202g_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling useful and valued with participation, requested to do voluntary
work for a couple of evenings: for a municipal service for children and
young people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many feel more useful, significant and valued when they participate in
voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary
work for a couple of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for children and young people.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
39 |
19.0% |
0.19024390 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
102 |
49.8% |
0.49756098 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
29 |
14.1% |
0.14146341 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
9 |
4.4% |
0.04390244 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
4.4% |
0.04390244 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3167 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
17 |
8.3% |
0.08292683 |
w02_dt202g_4
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling useful and valued with participation, requested to do voluntary
work for a couple of evenings: for a municipal service for the elderly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many feel more useful, significant and valued when they participate in
voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary
work for a couple of evenings…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for the elderly.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
40 |
19.5% |
0.19512195 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
96 |
46.8% |
0.46829268 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
32 |
15.6% |
0.15609756 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
11 |
5.4% |
0.05365854 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
3.9% |
0.03902439 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3167 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
18 |
8.8% |
0.08780488 |
w02_dt202h_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling useful and valued with participation, requested to do voluntary
work for one one hour a week for the next year: for the local Red Cross
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many feel more useful, significant and valued when they participate in
voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary
work for one hour a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for the local Red Cross.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
48 |
22.0% |
0.22018349 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
78 |
35.8% |
0.35779817 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
44 |
20.2% |
0.20183486 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
15 |
6.9% |
0.06880734 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
9.6% |
0.09633028 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3154 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
12 |
5.5% |
0.05504587 |
w02_dt202h_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling useful and valued with participation, requested to do voluntary
work for one one hour a week for the next year: for a local sports
association
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many feel more useful, significant and valued when they participate in
voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary
work for one hour a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a local sports association.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
41 |
18.8% |
0.18807339 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
57 |
26.1% |
0.26146789 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
60 |
27.5% |
0.27522936 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
27 |
12.4% |
0.12385321 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
10.1% |
0.10091743 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3154 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
11 |
5.0% |
0.05045872 |
w02_dt202h_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling useful and valued with participation, requested to do voluntary
work for one one hour a week for the next year: for a municipal service
for children and young people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many feel more useful, significant and valued when they participate in
voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary
work for one hour a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for children and young people.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
41 |
18.8% |
0.1880734 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
89 |
40.8% |
0.4082569 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
40 |
18.3% |
0.1834862 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
16 |
7.3% |
0.0733945 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
7.3% |
0.0733945 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3154 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
16 |
7.3% |
0.0733945 |
w02_dt202h_4
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling useful and valued with participation, requested to do voluntary
work for one one hour a week for the next year: for a municipal service
for the elderly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many feel more useful, significant and valued when they participate in
voluntary work. What would you do if someone asked you to do voluntary
work for one hour a week for the next year…
|
|
Literal question:
|
for a municipal service for the elderly.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would definitely say yes |
49 |
22.5% |
0.22477064 |
| 2 |
Would probably say yes |
68 |
31.2% |
0.31192661 |
| 3 |
Would probably say no |
52 |
23.9% |
0.23853211 |
| 4 |
Would definitely say no |
19 |
8.7% |
0.08715596 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
6.9% |
0.06880734 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3154 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
15 |
6.9% |
0.06880734 |
w02_hp4abc_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The resources we spend on health in Norway are sufficient
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask some questions related to health policy and priorities
in the health services. We are interested in your own opinion on these
issues, and ask that you answer as well as possible. First, to which
extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The resources we spend on health in Norway are sufficient to ensure full
preparedness and to perform all useful examinations, treatment and
preventive measures.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
58 |
3.5% |
0.03508772 |
| 2 |
Agree |
248 |
15.0% |
0.15003025 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
388 |
23.5% |
0.23472474 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
157 |
9.5% |
0.09497883 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
356 |
21.5% |
0.21536600 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
304 |
18.4% |
0.18390805 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
118 |
7.1% |
0.07138536 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
1.5% |
0.01451906 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_hp4abc_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Offering more extensive health services would take too much
of a toll on other important public responsibilities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask some questions related to health policy and priorities
in the health services. We are interested in your own opinion on these
issues, and ask that you answer as well as possible. First, to which
extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the health service is to provide all useful health measures, it will
take too much of a toll on other important public responsibilities, for
example education, police and transport.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
42 |
2.5% |
0.02540835 |
| 2 |
Agree |
151 |
9.1% |
0.09134906 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
372 |
22.5% |
0.22504537 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
270 |
16.3% |
0.16333938 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
377 |
22.8% |
0.22807018 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
316 |
19.1% |
0.19116757 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
92 |
5.6% |
0.05565638 |
| 97 |
No answer |
33 |
2.0% |
0.01996370 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_hp4abc_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Sensible that health service takes into consideration costs
when selecting treatments if it benifits other patients
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask some questions related to health policy and priorities
in the health services. We are interested in your own opinion on these
issues, and ask that you answer as well as possible. First, to which
extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is sensible that the health service takes into consideration costs
when selecting treatments, if this liberates resources for patients who
otherwise would not receive treatment.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
103 |
6.2% |
0.06231095 |
| 2 |
Agree |
385 |
23.3% |
0.23290986 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
479 |
29.0% |
0.28977616 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
277 |
16.8% |
0.16757411 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
195 |
11.8% |
0.11796733 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
127 |
7.7% |
0.07683001 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
56 |
3.4% |
0.03387780 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
1.9% |
0.01875378 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into six groups and selects one of the following
questions: HP7a - HP7f
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
274 |
16.6% |
0.165759226 |
| 2 |
2 |
287 |
17.4% |
0.173623714 |
| 3 |
3 |
267 |
16.2% |
0.161524501 |
| 4 |
4 |
265 |
16.0% |
0.160314580 |
| 5 |
5 |
278 |
16.8% |
0.168179068 |
| 6 |
6 |
274 |
16.6% |
0.165759226 |
| 97 |
|
8 |
0.5% |
0.004839685 |
| 98 |
|
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_hp7a
|
Variable label:
|
Waiting list for knee surgery, serious illness as a main rule should
advance in line
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that there is a waiting line for knee surgery and that surgery
would improve the knee function equally for everyone. To which extent do
you agree or disagree that those with the most serious illness as a main
rule should advance in line, even though that means that others would
have to wait longer?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
56 |
20.4% |
0.20437956 |
| 2 |
Agree |
108 |
39.4% |
0.39416058 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
58 |
21.2% |
0.21167883 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
23 |
8.4% |
0.08394161 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
12 |
4.4% |
0.04379562 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03284672 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
1.8% |
0.01824818 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3098 |
|
NA |
w02_hp7b
|
Variable label:
|
Someone close is on waiting list for knee surgery, serious illness as a
main rule should advance in line
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that someone close to you is on a waiting list for knee surgery
and that surgery would improve the knee function equally for everyone on
the waiting list. To which extent do you agree or disagree that those
with the most serious illness as a main rule should advance in line,
even though that means that a person close to you would have to wait
longer?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
71 |
24.7% |
0.247386760 |
| 2 |
Agree |
108 |
37.6% |
0.376306620 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
61 |
21.3% |
0.212543554 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
18 |
6.3% |
0.062717770 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
14 |
4.9% |
0.048780488 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
7 |
2.4% |
0.024390244 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
6 |
2.1% |
0.020905923 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006968641 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3085 |
|
NA |
w02_hp7c
|
Variable label:
|
You personally on the waiting list for knee surgery, serious illness as
a main rule should advance in line
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you are on a waiting list for knee surgery and that surgery
would improve the knee function equally for everyone on the waiting
list. To which extent do you agree or disagree that those with the most
serious illness as a main rule should advance in line, even though that
means that you would have to wait longer?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
61 |
22.8% |
0.228464419 |
| 2 |
Agree |
104 |
39.0% |
0.389513109 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
58 |
21.7% |
0.217228464 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
21 |
7.9% |
0.078651685 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
14 |
5.2% |
0.052434457 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
4 |
1.5% |
0.014981273 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
1.5% |
0.014981273 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003745318 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3105 |
|
NA |
w02_hp7d
|
Variable label:
|
Waiting list for knee surgery in patients with equally severe disease,
those who will benefit most from treatment should advance in line
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that there is a waiting list for knee surgery among patients
with equally serious illness. To which extent do you agree or disagree
that those who would benefit most from the treatment as a main rule
should advance in line, even though that means that others would have to
wait longer?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
16 |
6.0% |
0.06037736 |
| 2 |
Agree |
46 |
17.4% |
0.17358491 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
77 |
29.1% |
0.29056604 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
31 |
11.7% |
0.11698113 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
30 |
11.3% |
0.11320755 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
44 |
16.6% |
0.16603774 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
7.9% |
0.07924528 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3107 |
|
NA |
w02_hp7e
|
Variable label:
|
Someone close is on waiting list for knee surgery among patients with
equally serious illness, those who will benefit most from treatment
should advance in line
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that someone close to you is on a waiting list for knee surgery
among patients with equally serious illness. To which extent do you
agree or disagree that who would benefit most from the treatment as a
main rule should advance in line, even though that means that the person
close to you would have to wait longer?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
24 |
8.6% |
0.086330935 |
| 2 |
Agree |
58 |
20.9% |
0.208633094 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
78 |
28.1% |
0.280575540 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
26 |
9.4% |
0.093525180 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
33 |
11.9% |
0.118705036 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
34 |
12.2% |
0.122302158 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
24 |
8.6% |
0.086330935 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003597122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3094 |
|
NA |
w02_hp7f
|
Variable label:
|
You personally on the waiting list for knee surgery, serious illness as
a main rule should advance in line even if you have to wait longer
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you are on a waiting list for knee surgery among patients
with equally serious illness. To which extent do you agree or disagree
that those who would benefit most from the treatment as a main rule
should advance in line, even though that means you would have to wait
longer?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
22 |
8.0% |
0.080291971 |
| 2 |
Agree |
80 |
29.2% |
0.291970803 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
67 |
24.5% |
0.244525547 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
18 |
6.6% |
0.065693431 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
31 |
11.3% |
0.113138686 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
37 |
13.5% |
0.135036496 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
18 |
6.6% |
0.065693431 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003649635 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3098 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into two groups and selects one of the following
questions: HP8a/HPb
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1644] [Invalid:1728]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
834 |
50.7% |
0.5072993 |
| 2 |
2 |
810 |
49.3% |
0.4927007 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1728 |
|
NA |
w02_hp8a
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The authorities should use more resources than at present to
prevent illness, even though this will result in less resources for the
treatment of illness
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The authorities should use more resources than at present to prevent
illness, even though this will result in less resources for the
treatment of illness.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
76 |
9.1% |
0.09112710 |
| 2 |
Agree |
164 |
19.7% |
0.19664269 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
248 |
29.7% |
0.29736211 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
153 |
18.3% |
0.18345324 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
102 |
12.2% |
0.12230216 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
55 |
6.6% |
0.06594724 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02038369 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02278177 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2538 |
|
NA |
w02_hp8b
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: In those cases where many more lives can be saved by
preventing illness, the authorities should use more resources than at
present for prevention, even though this will result in less resources
for the treatment of illness
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In those cases where many more lives can be saved by preventing illness,
the authorities should use more resources than at present for
prevention, even though this will result in less resources for the
treatment of illness.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
79 |
9.8% |
0.09753086 |
| 2 |
Agree |
222 |
27.4% |
0.27407407 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
250 |
30.9% |
0.30864198 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
127 |
15.7% |
0.15679012 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
70 |
8.6% |
0.08641975 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
34 |
4.2% |
0.04197531 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01604938 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.9% |
0.01851852 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2562 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into three groups and selects one of the following
questions: HP9a-HP9c
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1643] [Invalid:1729]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
572 |
34.8% |
0.3481436 |
| 2 |
2 |
528 |
32.1% |
0.3213634 |
| 3 |
3 |
543 |
33.0% |
0.3304930 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1729 |
|
NA |
w02_hp9a
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Patients should have faster access to clarification and
treatment if they are in risk of dropping out of the labour market
|
|
Literal question:
|
And what is your opinion of this statement? Patients should have faster
access to clarification and treatment if they are in risk of dropping
out of the labour market. Do you…
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
215 |
37.6% |
0.375874126 |
| 2 |
Agree |
223 |
39.0% |
0.389860140 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
92 |
16.1% |
0.160839161 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
22 |
3.8% |
0.038461538 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
6 |
1.0% |
0.010489510 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006993007 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001748252 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.6% |
0.015734266 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2800 |
|
NA |
w02_hp9b
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Patients should have faster access to clarification and
treatment if they due to their illness are a great burden to their next
of kin
|
|
Literal question:
|
And what is your opinion of this statement? Patients should have faster
access to clarification and treatment if they due to their illness are a
great burden to their next of kin. Do you…
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
86 |
16.3% |
0.162878788 |
| 2 |
Agree |
184 |
34.8% |
0.348484848 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
134 |
25.4% |
0.253787879 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
68 |
12.9% |
0.128787879 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
31 |
5.9% |
0.058712121 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
14 |
2.7% |
0.026515152 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
6 |
1.1% |
0.011363636 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.9% |
0.009469697 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2844 |
|
NA |
w02_hp9c
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Patients should have faster access to clarification and
treatment if they care for small children
|
|
Literal question:
|
And what is your opinion of this statement? Patients should have faster
access to clarification and treatment if they care for small children.
Do you…
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
42 |
7.7% |
0.07734807 |
| 2 |
Agree |
120 |
22.1% |
0.22099448 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
137 |
25.2% |
0.25230203 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
113 |
20.8% |
0.20810313 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
64 |
11.8% |
0.11786372 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
45 |
8.3% |
0.08287293 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
2.9% |
0.02946593 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.1% |
0.01104972 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2829 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_ran4
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into three groups and selects one of the following
questions: HP10a-HP10c
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1642] [Invalid:1730]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
491 |
29.9% |
0.2990256 |
| 2 |
2 |
536 |
32.6% |
0.3264312 |
| 3 |
3 |
615 |
37.5% |
0.3745432 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1730 |
|
NA |
w02_hp10a
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Patients with serious illness who will experience minor
improvements in health from treatment should themselves pay for this
treatment if this frees up resources for other patients
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to which extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Patients with serious illness who will experience minor improvements in
health from treatment should themselves pay for this treatment if this
frees up resources for other patients.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
6 |
1.2% |
0.01221996 |
| 2 |
Agree |
29 |
5.9% |
0.05906314 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
63 |
12.8% |
0.12830957 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
58 |
11.8% |
0.11812627 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
96 |
19.6% |
0.19551935 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
152 |
31.0% |
0.30957230 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
81 |
16.5% |
0.16496945 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.2% |
0.01221996 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2881 |
|
NA |
w02_hp10b
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Patients with minor illnesses who will experience minor
improvements in health from treatment should themselves pay for this
treatment if this frees up resources for other patients
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to which extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Patients with minor illnesses who will experience minor improvements in
health from treatment should themselves pay for this treatment if this
frees up resources for other patients.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
18 |
3.4% |
0.03358209 |
| 2 |
Agree |
72 |
13.4% |
0.13432836 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
129 |
24.1% |
0.24067164 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
67 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
97 |
18.1% |
0.18097015 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
99 |
18.5% |
0.18470149 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
8.6% |
0.08582090 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.5% |
0.01492537 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2836 |
|
NA |
w02_hp10c
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Patients who will experience minor improvements in health
from treatment should themselves pay for this treatment if this frees up
resources for other patients
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to which extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Patients who will experience minor improvements in health from treatment
should themselves pay for this treatment if this frees up resources for
other patients.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
12 |
2.0% |
0.01951220 |
| 2 |
Agree |
70 |
11.4% |
0.11382114 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
141 |
22.9% |
0.22926829 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
95 |
15.4% |
0.15447154 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
91 |
14.8% |
0.14796748 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
137 |
22.3% |
0.22276423 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
60 |
9.8% |
0.09756098 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.5% |
0.01463415 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2757 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_ran5
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into two groups and selects one of the following
questions: HP11a/HP11b
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1642] [Invalid:1730]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
773 |
47.1% |
0.4707674 |
| 2 |
2 |
869 |
52.9% |
0.5292326 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1730 |
|
NA |
w02_hp11a
|
Variable label:
|
Hospitals say no to a treatment that the patient wants, the patient
receives a different treatment which is almost as good and which frees
up resources for other patients
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you feel about hospitals saying no to treatment the patient
himself wants, if the patient is given other treatment that is almost as
good and which frees up resources for other patients? Would you say that
it is…
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
49 |
6.3% |
0.063389392 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
295 |
38.2% |
0.381630013 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
214 |
27.7% |
0.276843467 |
| 4 |
Neither acceptable nor unacceptable |
79 |
10.2% |
0.102199224 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unacceptable |
74 |
9.6% |
0.095730918 |
| 6 |
Unacceptable |
37 |
4.8% |
0.047865459 |
| 7 |
Very unacceptable |
18 |
2.3% |
0.023285899 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.9% |
0.009055627 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2599 |
|
NA |
w02_hp11b
|
Variable label:
|
Hospitals say no to a treatment that the patient wants, the patient
receives a different treatment that scientific studies have considered
better for patients
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you feel about hospitals saying no to treatment the patient
himself wants, if the patient is given other treatment that scientific
studies have shown to better for patients? Would you say that it is…
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
130 |
15.0% |
0.14959724 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
318 |
36.6% |
0.36593786 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
171 |
19.7% |
0.19677791 |
| 4 |
Neither acceptable nor unacceptable |
95 |
10.9% |
0.10932106 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unacceptable |
81 |
9.3% |
0.09321059 |
| 6 |
Unacceptable |
47 |
5.4% |
0.05408516 |
| 7 |
Very unacceptable |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01265823 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.8% |
0.01841197 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2503 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_ran6
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into three groups and selects one of the following
questions: HP12a-HP12C
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1641] [Invalid:1731]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
547 |
33.3% |
0.3333333 |
| 2 |
2 |
566 |
34.5% |
0.3449116 |
| 3 |
3 |
528 |
32.2% |
0.3217550 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1731 |
|
NA |
w02_hp12a
|
Variable label:
|
Reasonable: Patient with livable disease hear about a treatment abroad,
but the doctor decides that it can not be offered
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that the hospital acts reasonably or unreasonably in this
example: Imagine a patient undergoing hospital treatment for an illness
that one can live with, but where there is a risk of significant
deterioration over time. The patient has heard of new treatment abroad,
and wonders why the hospital does not offer this treatment. The reason
is that the patient’s physician has thoroughly assessed the treatment
and decided that it will not be offered. The patient is informed of this
and is not offered treatment. I think the hospital acted…
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very reasonably |
21 |
3.8% |
0.03839122 |
| 2 |
Reasonably |
112 |
20.5% |
0.20475320 |
| 3 |
Somewhat reasonably |
108 |
19.7% |
0.19744059 |
| 4 |
Neither reasonably nor unreasonably |
60 |
11.0% |
0.10968921 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unreasonably |
112 |
20.5% |
0.20475320 |
| 6 |
Unreasonably |
98 |
17.9% |
0.17915905 |
| 7 |
Very unreasonably |
28 |
5.1% |
0.05118830 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.5% |
0.01462523 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2825 |
|
NA |
w02_hp12b
|
Variable label:
|
Reasonable: Patient with livable disease hear about a treatment abroad,
but professional expertise determines that it can not be offered
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that the hospital acts reasonably or unreasonably in this
example: Imagine a patient undergoing hospital treatment for an illness
that one can live with, but where there is a risk of significant
deterioration over time. The patient has heard of new treatment abroad,
and wonders why the hospital does not offer this treatment. The reason
is that the country’s foremost professional expertise has thoroughly
assessed the treatment and agreed that it will not be offered. The
patient is informed of this and is not offered treatment. I think the
hospital acted…
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very reasonably |
37 |
6.5% |
0.065371025 |
| 2 |
Reasonably |
143 |
25.3% |
0.252650177 |
| 3 |
Somewhat reasonably |
101 |
17.8% |
0.178445230 |
| 4 |
Neither reasonably nor unreasonably |
68 |
12.0% |
0.120141343 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unreasonably |
95 |
16.8% |
0.167844523 |
| 6 |
Unreasonably |
79 |
14.0% |
0.139575972 |
| 7 |
Very unreasonably |
41 |
7.2% |
0.072438163 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003533569 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2806 |
|
NA |
w02_hp12c
|
Variable label:
|
Reasonable: Patient with livable disease hear about a treatment abroad,
but professional expertise and patient organizations determines that it
will not be offered
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that the hospital acts reasonably or unreasonably in this
example: Imagine a patient undergoing hospital treatment for an illness
that one can live with, but where there is a risk of significant
deterioration over time. The patient has heard of new treatment abroad,
and wonders why the hospital does not offer this treatment. The reason
is that the country’s foremost professional expertise in consultation
with patient organization representatives have thoroughly assessed the
treatment and agreed that it will not be offered. The patient is
informed of this and is not offered treatment. I think the hospital
acted…
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very reasonably |
55 |
10.4% |
0.104166667 |
| 2 |
Reasonably |
131 |
24.8% |
0.248106061 |
| 3 |
Somewhat reasonably |
102 |
19.3% |
0.193181818 |
| 4 |
Neither reasonably nor unreasonably |
55 |
10.4% |
0.104166667 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unreasonably |
89 |
16.9% |
0.168560606 |
| 6 |
Unreasonably |
62 |
11.7% |
0.117424242 |
| 7 |
Very unreasonably |
29 |
5.5% |
0.054924242 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.9% |
0.009469697 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2844 |
|
NA |
w02_hp2
|
Variable label:
|
Examined or treated by the health service in the past 12 months
|
|
Literal question:
|
How frequently have you been examined or treated by the health service
(e.g. by doctor or at a hospital) in the past 12 months?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
331 |
20.0% |
0.20024198 |
| 2 |
Once |
482 |
29.2% |
0.29159105 |
| 3 |
2 to 5 times |
616 |
37.3% |
0.37265578 |
| 4 |
More than 5 times |
207 |
12.5% |
0.12522686 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.0% |
0.01028433 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_ran7
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into two groups and selects one of the following
questions: HP3a/HP3b
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1638] [Invalid:1734]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
797 |
48.7% |
0.486569 |
| 2 |
2 |
841 |
51.3% |
0.513431 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1734 |
|
NA |
w02_hp3a
|
Variable label:
|
Not given examination or treatment because of limited resources in
health services
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you experienced not receiving the examination or treatment that
would have been best for you due to limited resources in the health
service?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
97 |
12.2% |
0.12170640 |
| 2 |
No |
625 |
78.4% |
0.78419072 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.3% |
0.00250941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2575 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
73 |
9.2% |
0.09159348 |
w02_hp3b
|
Variable label:
|
Received examination or treatment later due to limited resources in
health services
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you experienced receiving examination or treatment later than would
have been best for you due to limited resources in the health service?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
242 |
28.8% |
0.287752675 |
| 2 |
No |
538 |
64.0% |
0.639714625 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005945303 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2531 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
56 |
6.7% |
0.066587396 |
w02_dv211
|
Variable label:
|
Opplevelse av medbestemmelse i valg av behandling og helsetiltak
|
|
Literal question:
|
Public authorities emphasize user-participation, i.e. the population’s
opportunity to influence the design of public services. To which extent
do you experience co-determination in the choice of treatment and health
measures?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
22 |
1.3% |
0.01330913 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
131 |
7.9% |
0.07924985 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
394 |
23.8% |
0.23835451 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
441 |
26.7% |
0.26678766 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
189 |
11.4% |
0.11433757 |
| 6 |
Not a relevant issue to me |
440 |
26.6% |
0.26618270 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
2.2% |
0.02177858 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_dv212
|
Variable label:
|
Experience of co-determination in the choice of treatment and health
measures
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to which extent do you desire co-determination in the choice of
treatment and health measures?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
202 |
12.2% |
0.12220206 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
567 |
34.3% |
0.34301270 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
718 |
43.4% |
0.43436177 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
123 |
7.4% |
0.07441016 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
18 |
1.1% |
0.01088929 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
1.5% |
0.01512402 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_s1_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2 and S=1
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 and S=1 into three groups and selects one of the
following questions: KM26/KM27 + control group
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:822] [Invalid:2550]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
265 |
32.2% |
0.3223844 |
| 2 |
2 |
263 |
32.0% |
0.3199513 |
| 3 |
3 |
294 |
35.8% |
0.3576642 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2550 |
|
NA |
w02_km26_1
|
Variable label:
|
Three reasons people want to prevent climate change [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Why do people want to prevent climate change? Note up to three reasons
in the fields below.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km26_2
|
Variable label:
|
Three reasons people want to prevent climate change [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Why do people want to prevent climate change? Note up to three reasons
in the fields below.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km26_3
|
Variable label:
|
Three reasons people want to prevent climate change [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Why do people want to prevent climate change? Note up to three reasons
in the fields below.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km27_1
|
Variable label:
|
Three ways people are trying to prevent climate change [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do people try to prevent climate change? Note up to three ways in
the fields below.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km27_2
|
Variable label:
|
Three ways people are trying to prevent climate change [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do people try to prevent climate change? Note up to three ways in
the fields below.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km27_3
|
Variable label:
|
Three ways people are trying to prevent climate change [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do people try to prevent climate change? Note up to three ways in
the fields below.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_km35
|
Variable label:
|
Climate change as a specific or abstract concept
|
|
Literal question:
|
When you consider climate change and everything you relate to it, how
specific or abstract does the thought seem to you?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very specific |
78 |
9.5% |
0.09454545 |
| 2 |
Specific |
230 |
27.9% |
0.27878788 |
| 3 |
Somewhat specific |
263 |
31.9% |
0.31878788 |
| 4 |
Neither specific nor abstract |
126 |
15.3% |
0.15272727 |
| 5 |
Somewhat abstract |
77 |
9.3% |
0.09333333 |
| 6 |
Abstract |
28 |
3.4% |
0.03393939 |
| 7 |
Very abstract |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01454545 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_km241
|
Variable label:
|
Assuming climate change may become a huge problem, what can be done to
prevent it
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s assume that climate change may become a major threat to the world
in the future if no action is taken. To which extent do you believe that
it is possible to do anything to prevent harmful climate changes? Select
the statement that is closest to your view:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It is impossible to do anything to prevent harmful climate change. |
103 |
6.2% |
0.062310950 |
| 2 |
It is possible, but very difficult to do something to prevent harmful climate
change. |
915 |
55.4% |
0.553539020 |
| 3 |
It is possible and completely realistic to do something to prevent harmful
climate change. |
588 |
35.6% |
0.355716878 |
| 4 |
It is easy to prevent harmful climate change. |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005444646 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
2.3% |
0.022988506 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_km242
|
Variable label:
|
The seriousness of climate change as a threat overall [Question KM242
and KM243 is set in randomized order]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change overall?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
224 |
27.2% |
0.27151515 |
| 2 |
Serious |
331 |
40.1% |
0.40121212 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
192 |
23.3% |
0.23272727 |
| 4 |
Lite alvorlig |
50 |
6.1% |
0.06060606 |
| 5 |
Not very serious |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01090909 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02303030 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_km243
|
Variable label:
|
The seriousness of climate change as a threat personally [Question KM242
and KM243 is set in randomized order]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change to you personally?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
40 |
4.8% |
0.04848485 |
| 2 |
Serious |
178 |
21.6% |
0.21575758 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
276 |
33.5% |
0.33454545 |
| 4 |
Lite alvorlig |
262 |
31.8% |
0.31757576 |
| 5 |
Not very serious |
60 |
7.3% |
0.07272727 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01090909 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_km244
|
Variable label:
|
How specific or abstract costs associated with climate change appear
|
|
Literal question:
|
When you consider what it may cost to do everything needed to prevent
hazardous climate changes, how specific or abstract do such costs appear
to you?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very specific |
38 |
4.6% |
0.04606061 |
| 2 |
Specific |
144 |
17.5% |
0.17454545 |
| 3 |
Somewhat specific |
211 |
25.6% |
0.25575758 |
| 4 |
Neither specific nor abstract |
187 |
22.7% |
0.22666667 |
| 5 |
Somewhat abstract |
137 |
16.6% |
0.16606061 |
| 6 |
Abstract |
58 |
7.0% |
0.07030303 |
| 7 |
Very abstract |
32 |
3.9% |
0.03878788 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.2% |
0.02181818 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_km245_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiencing these feelings when it comes to climate change: Hope
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you relate to it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hope
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rate each emotion on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
(1) to “very strongly” (5)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all (1) |
99 |
6.0% |
0.05989111 |
| 2 |
Little |
307 |
18.6% |
0.18572293 |
| 3 |
Some |
763 |
46.2% |
0.46158500 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
364 |
22.0% |
0.22020569 |
| 5 |
Very strongly (5) |
37 |
2.2% |
0.02238355 |
| 97 |
No answer |
83 |
5.0% |
0.05021174 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_km245_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiencing these feelings when it comes to climate change: Anxiety
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you relate to it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anxiety
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rate each emotion on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
(1) to “very strongly” (5)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all (1) |
254 |
15.4% |
0.15366001 |
| 2 |
Little |
477 |
28.9% |
0.28856624 |
| 3 |
Some |
601 |
36.4% |
0.36358137 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
213 |
12.9% |
0.12885662 |
| 5 |
Very strongly (5) |
31 |
1.9% |
0.01875378 |
| 97 |
No answer |
77 |
4.7% |
0.04658197 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_km245_3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiencing these feelings when it comes to climate change: Sadness
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you relate to it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sadness
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rate each emotion on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
(1) to “very strongly” (5)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all (1) |
257 |
15.5% |
0.15547489 |
| 2 |
Little |
419 |
25.3% |
0.25347852 |
| 3 |
Some |
591 |
35.8% |
0.35753176 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
246 |
14.9% |
0.14882033 |
| 5 |
Very strongly (5) |
57 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
| 97 |
No answer |
83 |
5.0% |
0.05021174 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_km245_4
|
Variable label:
|
Experiencing these feelings when it comes to climate change: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you relate to it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rate each emotion on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
(1) to “very strongly” (5)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all (1) |
412 |
24.9% |
0.24924380 |
| 2 |
Little |
567 |
34.3% |
0.34301270 |
| 3 |
Some |
444 |
26.9% |
0.26860254 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
116 |
7.0% |
0.07017544 |
| 5 |
Very strongly (5) |
31 |
1.9% |
0.01875378 |
| 97 |
No answer |
83 |
5.0% |
0.05021174 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_km245_5
|
Variable label:
|
Experiencing these feelings when it comes to climate change: Guilt
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you relate to it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Guilt
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rate each emotion on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
(1) to “very strongly” (5)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all (1) |
330 |
20.0% |
0.199637024 |
| 2 |
Little |
567 |
34.3% |
0.343012704 |
| 3 |
Some |
591 |
35.8% |
0.357531760 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
74 |
4.5% |
0.044767090 |
| 5 |
Very strongly (5) |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007259528 |
| 97 |
No answer |
79 |
4.8% |
0.047791894 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_km245_6
|
Variable label:
|
Experiencing these feelings when it comes to climate change: Interest
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you relate to it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Interest
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rate each emotion on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
(1) to “very strongly” (5)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all (1) |
47 |
2.8% |
0.02843315 |
| 2 |
Little |
133 |
8.0% |
0.08045977 |
| 3 |
Some |
714 |
43.2% |
0.43194192 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
566 |
34.2% |
0.34240774 |
| 5 |
Very strongly (5) |
113 |
6.8% |
0.06836056 |
| 97 |
No answer |
80 |
4.8% |
0.04839685 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_km245_7
|
Variable label:
|
Experiencing these feelings when it comes to climate change: Compassion
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you relate to it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rate each emotion on the given scale that goes from “not at all”
(1) to “very strongly” (5)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all (1) |
160 |
9.7% |
0.09679371 |
| 2 |
Little |
288 |
17.4% |
0.17422868 |
| 3 |
Some |
709 |
42.9% |
0.42891712 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
348 |
21.1% |
0.21052632 |
| 5 |
Very strongly (5) |
58 |
3.5% |
0.03508772 |
| 97 |
No answer |
90 |
5.4% |
0.05444646 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w02_km246
|
Variable label:
|
Moral duty for individuals to contribute to prevent climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
To which degree do you view it as a moral duty for individuals to
contribute to prevent climate change?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
135 |
16.4% |
0.16363636 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
314 |
38.1% |
0.38060606 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
283 |
34.3% |
0.34303030 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
64 |
7.8% |
0.07757576 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01939394 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01575758 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_km4750_1
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to reduce climate change: Strengthen focus on capture and
storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would no like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been
proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the
measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement
on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or
negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or
underground
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very negative |
22 |
2.7% |
0.02666667 |
| 2 |
Negative |
60 |
7.3% |
0.07272727 |
| 3 |
Somewhat negative |
52 |
6.3% |
0.06303030 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
281 |
34.1% |
0.34060606 |
| 5 |
Somewhat positive |
179 |
21.7% |
0.21696970 |
| 6 |
Positive |
152 |
18.4% |
0.18424242 |
| 7 |
Very positive |
49 |
5.9% |
0.05939394 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
3.6% |
0.03636364 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_km4750_2
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to reduce climate change: Increase funding for research into,
and the development of renewable energy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would no like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been
proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the
measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement
on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or
negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase funding for research into, and the development of renewable
energy
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very negative |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003636364 |
| 2 |
Negative |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008484848 |
| 3 |
Somewhat negative |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008484848 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
43 |
5.2% |
0.052121212 |
| 5 |
Somewhat positive |
139 |
16.8% |
0.168484848 |
| 6 |
Positive |
306 |
37.1% |
0.370909091 |
| 7 |
Very positive |
298 |
36.1% |
0.361212121 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
2.7% |
0.026666667 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_km4750_3
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to reduce climate change: Introduce punitive duty on goods from
countries the emit more greenhouse gases that they are permitted to
under the Kyoto Protocol
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would no like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been
proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the
measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement
on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or
negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Introduce punitive duty on goods from countries the emit more greenhouse
gases that they are permitted to under the Kyoto Protocol
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very negative |
29 |
3.5% |
0.03515152 |
| 2 |
Negative |
49 |
5.9% |
0.05939394 |
| 3 |
Somewhat negative |
63 |
7.6% |
0.07636364 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
176 |
21.3% |
0.21333333 |
| 5 |
Somewhat positive |
231 |
28.0% |
0.28000000 |
| 6 |
Positive |
168 |
20.4% |
0.20363636 |
| 7 |
Very positive |
83 |
10.1% |
0.10060606 |
| 97 |
No answer |
26 |
3.2% |
0.03151515 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_km4750_4
|
Variable label:
|
Measures to reduce climate change: Plant more trees and reduce
deforestation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would no like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been
proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the
measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement
on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or
negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Plant more trees and reduce deforestation
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very negative |
5 |
0.6% |
0.006060606 |
| 2 |
Negative |
9 |
1.1% |
0.010909091 |
| 3 |
Somewhat negative |
15 |
1.8% |
0.018181818 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
77 |
9.3% |
0.093333333 |
| 5 |
Somewhat positive |
170 |
20.6% |
0.206060606 |
| 6 |
Positive |
300 |
36.4% |
0.363636364 |
| 7 |
Very positive |
228 |
27.6% |
0.276363636 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.025454545 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_s2_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2 and S=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 and S=2 into two groups and selects one of the
following questions: KM213a/KM213b
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:812] [Invalid:2560]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
393 |
48.4% |
0.4839901 |
| 2 |
2 |
419 |
51.6% |
0.5160099 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2560 |
|
NA |
w02_km213a
|
Variable label:
|
Emissions creates climate change, but Norwegian oil production is
cleaner: should Norway reduce, maintain or increase its oil production
|
|
Literal question:
|
Emissions of CO2 from the combustion of oil is a significant contributor
to man-made climate changes, but the world needs energy, and Norwegian
oil production is cleaner than in many other countries. Should Norway,
in your opinion, reduce, maintain or increase its oil production in a
climate perspective?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Check 1 of the following options:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Reduce |
120 |
30.5% |
0.30534351 |
| 2 |
Maintain |
241 |
61.3% |
0.61323155 |
| 3 |
Increase |
25 |
6.4% |
0.06361323 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.8% |
0.01781170 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2979 |
|
NA |
w02_km213b
|
Variable label:
|
Norwegian oil production is cleaner, but emissions creates climate
change: should Norway reduce, maintain or increase its oil production
|
|
Literal question:
|
The world needs energy, and Norwegian oil production is cleaner than in
many other countries, but the emissions of CO2 from the combustion of
oil is a significant contributor to man-made climate changes. Should
Norway, in your opinion, reduce, maintain or increase its oil production
in a climate perspective?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Check 1 of the following options:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Reduce |
156 |
37.2% |
0.372315036 |
| 2 |
Maintain |
227 |
54.2% |
0.541766110 |
| 3 |
Increase |
32 |
7.6% |
0.076372315 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.0% |
0.009546539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2953 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_ran8
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into four groups and selects the following questions
in pairs (for example DV207a and DV207b): DV207a-DV207d/DV208a-DV208d
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1631] [Invalid:1741]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
415 |
25.4% |
0.2544451 |
| 2 |
2 |
412 |
25.3% |
0.2526058 |
| 3 |
3 |
418 |
25.6% |
0.2562845 |
| 4 |
4 |
386 |
23.7% |
0.2366646 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1741 |
|
NA |
w02_dv207a
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion regarding party programme: less power to the EU, more money for
the elderly and less immigration [See screenshot attached in the
codebook]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in knowing what you and the other participants in the
Citizen Panel think of the party below. We therefore ask that you read
the party’s (short) programme. After reading the programme, press one of
the thumbs to show what you think of the party. If you like the party,
press the green thumb, and if you don’t like the party, press the red
thumb. If you are neutral toward the party press the orange thumb.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Party A: Programme The EU has too much influence on Norwegian society.
Power must be transferred back from Brussels to Norway. More money
should be spent on care for the elderly. Immigration from non-western
countries should be dramatically reduced.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Like |
136 |
32.8% |
0.32771084 |
| 2 |
Neutral |
138 |
33.3% |
0.33253012 |
| 3 |
Don't like |
105 |
25.3% |
0.25301205 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
8.7% |
0.08674699 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2957 |
|
NA |
w02_dv208a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for party [See screenshot attached in the codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you imagine an election situation where this party actually exists,
how likely is it that you could ever imagine voting for the party? Use
the following scale where 0 means “not likely at all” and 10 means “very
likely”:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - Not likely at all |
76 |
18.3% |
0.18313253 |
| 2 |
1 |
35 |
8.4% |
0.08433735 |
| 3 |
2 |
44 |
10.6% |
0.10602410 |
| 4 |
3 |
34 |
8.2% |
0.08192771 |
| 5 |
4 |
25 |
6.0% |
0.06024096 |
| 6 |
5 |
53 |
12.8% |
0.12771084 |
| 7 |
6 |
32 |
7.7% |
0.07710843 |
| 8 |
7 |
37 |
8.9% |
0.08915663 |
| 9 |
8 |
28 |
6.7% |
0.06746988 |
| 10 |
9 |
13 |
3.1% |
0.03132530 |
| 11 |
10 - Very likely |
24 |
5.8% |
0.05783133 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
3.4% |
0.03373494 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2957 |
|
NA |
w02_dv207b
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion regarding party programme: less power to the EU, more money for
the elderly and less immigration [See screenshot attached in the
codebook]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in knowing what you and the other participants in the
Citizen Panel think of the party below. We therefore ask that you read
the party’s (short) programme. After reading the programme, press one of
the thumbs to show what you think of the party. If you like the party,
press the green thumb, and if you don’t like the party, press the red
thumb. If you are neutral toward the party press the orange thumb.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Party A: Programme The EU has too much influence on Norwegian society.
Power must be transferred back from Brussels to Norway. More money
should be spent on care for the elderly. Immigration from non-western
countries should be dramatically reduced.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Like |
106 |
25.7% |
0.2572816 |
| 2 |
Neutral |
129 |
31.3% |
0.3131068 |
| 3 |
Don't like |
130 |
31.6% |
0.3155340 |
| 97 |
No answer |
47 |
11.4% |
0.1140777 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2960 |
|
NA |
w02_dv208b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for party [See screenshot attached in the codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you imagine an election situation where this party actually exists,
how likely is it that you could ever imagine voting for the party? Use
the following scale where 0 means “not likely at all” and 10 means “very
likely”:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - Not likely at all |
85 |
20.6% |
0.20631068 |
| 2 |
1 |
30 |
7.3% |
0.07281553 |
| 3 |
2 |
40 |
9.7% |
0.09708738 |
| 4 |
3 |
43 |
10.4% |
0.10436893 |
| 5 |
4 |
17 |
4.1% |
0.04126214 |
| 6 |
5 |
65 |
15.8% |
0.15776699 |
| 7 |
6 |
28 |
6.8% |
0.06796117 |
| 8 |
7 |
28 |
6.8% |
0.06796117 |
| 9 |
8 |
15 |
3.6% |
0.03640777 |
| 10 |
9 |
12 |
2.9% |
0.02912621 |
| 11 |
10 - Very likely |
22 |
5.3% |
0.05339806 |
| 97 |
No answer |
27 |
6.6% |
0.06553398 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2960 |
|
NA |
w02_dv207c
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion regarding party programme: Higher taxes on businesses, products
and cars that pollute, freedom of the internet, referendum on new laws
[See screenshot attached in the codebook]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in knowing what you and the other participants in the
Citizen Panel think of the party below. We therefore ask that you read
the party’s (short) programme. After reading the programme, press one of
the thumbs to show what you think of the party. If you like the party,
press the green thumb, and if you don’t like the party, press the red
thumb. If you are neutral toward the party press the orange thumb.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Party A: Programme The environment should be protected through higher
taxes for corporations, products and vehicles that pollute The
government should do more to ensure full online freedom There should be
referendums on new, important laws.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Like |
64 |
15.3% |
0.1531100 |
| 2 |
Neutral |
171 |
40.9% |
0.4090909 |
| 3 |
Don't like |
134 |
32.1% |
0.3205742 |
| 97 |
No answer |
49 |
11.7% |
0.1172249 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2954 |
|
NA |
w02_dv208c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for party [See screenshot attached in the codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you imagine an election situation where this party actually exists,
how likely is it that you could ever imagine voting for the party? Use
the following scale where 0 means “not likely at all” and 10 means “very
likely”:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - Not likely at all |
78 |
18.7% |
0.18660287 |
| 2 |
1 |
36 |
8.6% |
0.08612440 |
| 3 |
2 |
54 |
12.9% |
0.12918660 |
| 4 |
3 |
53 |
12.7% |
0.12679426 |
| 5 |
4 |
30 |
7.2% |
0.07177033 |
| 6 |
5 |
61 |
14.6% |
0.14593301 |
| 7 |
6 |
29 |
6.9% |
0.06937799 |
| 8 |
7 |
20 |
4.8% |
0.04784689 |
| 9 |
8 |
13 |
3.1% |
0.03110048 |
| 10 |
9 |
5 |
1.2% |
0.01196172 |
| 11 |
10 - Very likely |
9 |
2.2% |
0.02153110 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
7.2% |
0.07177033 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2954 |
|
NA |
w02_dv207d
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion regarding party programme: Higher taxes on businesses, products
and cars that pollute, freedom of the internet, referendum on new laws
[See screenshot attached in the codebook]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in knowing what you and the other participants in the
Citizen Panel think of the party below. We therefore ask that you read
the party’s (short) programme. After reading the programme, press one of
the thumbs to show what you think of the party. If you like the party,
press the green thumb, and if you don’t like the party, press the red
thumb. If you are neutral toward the party press the orange thumb.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Party A: Programme The environment should be protected through higher
taxes for corporations, products and vehicles that pollute The
government should do more to ensure full online freedom There should be
referendums on new, important laws.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Like |
52 |
13.5% |
0.1347150 |
| 2 |
Neutral |
133 |
34.5% |
0.3445596 |
| 3 |
Don't like |
159 |
41.2% |
0.4119171 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
10.9% |
0.1088083 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2986 |
|
NA |
w02_dv208d_1
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for party [See screenshot attached in the codebook]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you imagine an election situation where this party actually exists,
how likely is it that you could ever imagine voting for the party? Use
the following scale where 0 means “not likely at all” and 10 means “very
likely”:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - Not likely at all |
88 |
22.8% |
0.227979275 |
| 2 |
1 |
39 |
10.1% |
0.101036269 |
| 3 |
2 |
56 |
14.5% |
0.145077720 |
| 4 |
3 |
46 |
11.9% |
0.119170984 |
| 5 |
4 |
26 |
6.7% |
0.067357513 |
| 6 |
5 |
43 |
11.1% |
0.111398964 |
| 7 |
6 |
29 |
7.5% |
0.075129534 |
| 8 |
7 |
22 |
5.7% |
0.056994819 |
| 9 |
8 |
10 |
2.6% |
0.025906736 |
| 10 |
9 |
3 |
0.8% |
0.007772021 |
| 11 |
10 - Very likely |
3 |
0.8% |
0.007772021 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
5.4% |
0.054404145 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2986 |
|
NA |
w02_u2_s2_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2 and S=2
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 and S=2 into four groups and selects one of the
following questions: DV203a-DV203d
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:812] [Invalid:2560]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
191 |
23.5% |
0.2352217 |
| 2 |
2 |
208 |
25.6% |
0.2561576 |
| 3 |
3 |
215 |
26.5% |
0.2647783 |
| 4 |
4 |
198 |
24.4% |
0.2438424 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2560 |
|
NA |
w02_dv203a
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that political activists physically attack their political
opponents
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how acceptable or unacceptable is it that political
activists physically attack their political opponents?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
4 |
2.1% |
0.02094241 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
2 |
1.0% |
0.01047120 |
| 4 |
Neither acceptable nor unacceptable |
4 |
2.1% |
0.02094241 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unacceptable |
2 |
1.0% |
0.01047120 |
| 6 |
Unacceptable |
36 |
18.8% |
0.18848168 |
| 7 |
Very unacceptable |
143 |
74.9% |
0.74869110 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3181 |
|
NA |
w02_dv203b
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that political activists threaten to use violence against
their political opponents
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how acceptable or unacceptable is it that political
activists threaten their political opponents with violence?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
5 |
2.4% |
0.024038462 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
2 |
1.0% |
0.009615385 |
| 4 |
Neither acceptable nor unacceptable |
4 |
1.9% |
0.019230769 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unacceptable |
4 |
1.9% |
0.019230769 |
| 6 |
Unacceptable |
37 |
17.8% |
0.177884615 |
| 7 |
Very unacceptable |
156 |
75.0% |
0.750000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3164 |
|
NA |
w02_dv203c
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that political activists shout offensive words to political
opponents
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how acceptable or unacceptable is it that political
activists orally abuse their political opponents?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004651163 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
6 |
2.8% |
0.027906977 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
14 |
6.5% |
0.065116279 |
| 4 |
Neither acceptable nor unacceptable |
18 |
8.4% |
0.083720930 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unacceptable |
20 |
9.3% |
0.093023256 |
| 6 |
Unacceptable |
89 |
41.4% |
0.413953488 |
| 7 |
Very unacceptable |
66 |
30.7% |
0.306976744 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004651163 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3157 |
|
NA |
w02_dv203d
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that political activists organize demonstrations against its
political opponents
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how acceptable or unacceptable is it that political
activists organize demonstrations against their political opponents?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
54 |
27.3% |
0.272727273 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
72 |
36.4% |
0.363636364 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
22 |
11.1% |
0.111111111 |
| 4 |
Neither acceptable nor unacceptable |
23 |
11.6% |
0.116161616 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unacceptable |
12 |
6.1% |
0.060606061 |
| 6 |
Unacceptable |
11 |
5.6% |
0.055555556 |
| 7 |
Very unacceptable |
3 |
1.5% |
0.015151515 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005050505 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3174 |
|
NA |
w02_dv204
|
Variable label:
|
How many do you think agree with your assessment
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many do you think agree with your assessment?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
All, or nearly all |
165 |
20.0% |
0.200000000 |
| 2 |
A majority (more than half) |
351 |
42.5% |
0.425454545 |
| 3 |
Around half |
218 |
26.4% |
0.264242424 |
| 4 |
A minority (less than half) |
61 |
7.4% |
0.073939394 |
| 5 |
None |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002424242 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
3.4% |
0.033939394 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2547 |
|
NA |
w02_hp1
|
Variable label:
|
About health condition
|
|
Literal question:
|
Finally, we would like to ask you a few questions about yourself: In
general, would you say your health is:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
471 |
14.0% |
0.13967972 |
| 2 |
Very good |
1315 |
39.0% |
0.38997628 |
| 3 |
Good |
1084 |
32.1% |
0.32147094 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
337 |
10.0% |
0.09994069 |
| 5 |
Poor |
94 |
2.8% |
0.02787663 |
| 97 |
No answer |
71 |
2.1% |
0.02105575 |
w02_km2012
|
Variable label:
|
Identification with trade union or trade union confederation [Question
asked if dt10_19=1 in Medborgerpanelet round 1.] [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which trade union or trade union confederation do you most closely
identify with?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w02_P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1687 |
50.0% |
0.5002966 |
| 2 |
Female |
1685 |
50.0% |
0.4997034 |
w02_P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
958 |
28.4% |
0.28410439 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
827 |
24.5% |
0.24525504 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
162 |
4.8% |
0.04804270 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
927 |
27.5% |
0.27491103 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
258 |
7.7% |
0.07651246 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
240 |
7.1% |
0.07117438 |
w02_P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus |
415 |
12.3% |
0.123072361 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
543 |
16.1% |
0.161032028 |
| 3 |
Østfold |
173 |
5.1% |
0.051304864 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
162 |
4.8% |
0.048042705 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
101 |
3.0% |
0.029952550 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
114 |
3.4% |
0.033807829 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
168 |
5.0% |
0.049822064 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
109 |
3.2% |
0.032325030 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
99 |
2.9% |
0.029359431 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
63 |
1.9% |
0.018683274 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
326 |
9.7% |
0.096678529 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
395 |
11.7% |
0.117141163 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
59 |
1.7% |
0.017497034 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
147 |
4.4% |
0.043594306 |
| 15 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
198 |
5.9% |
0.058718861 |
| 16 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
60 |
1.8% |
0.017793594 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
126 |
3.7% |
0.037366548 |
| 18 |
Troms |
86 |
2.6% |
0.025504152 |
| 19 |
Finmark |
28 |
0.8% |
0.008303677 |
w02_P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3359] [Invalid:13]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
323 |
9.6% |
0.09615957 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary eduction |
1062 |
31.6% |
0.31616553 |
| 3 |
University/university college |
1798 |
53.5% |
0.53527836 |
| 97 |
No answer |
176 |
5.2% |
0.05239655 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13 |
|
NA |
W02_P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education [obtained from w01_k26]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3359] [Invalid:13]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
17 |
0.5% |
0.005061030 |
| 2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
15 |
0.4% |
0.004465615 |
| 3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
291 |
8.7% |
0.086632926 |
| 4 |
College certificate |
36 |
1.1% |
0.010717475 |
| 5 |
Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education
programme, one-year post admission |
447 |
13.3% |
0.133075320 |
| 6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
418 |
12.4% |
0.124441798 |
| 7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
42 |
1.3% |
0.012503721 |
| 8 |
Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical
college) |
119 |
3.5% |
0.035427210 |
| 9 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
303 |
9.0% |
0.090205418 |
| 10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
639 |
19.0% |
0.190235189 |
| 11 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
236 |
7.0% |
0.070259006 |
| 12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
202 |
6.0% |
0.060136946 |
| 13 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
363 |
10.8% |
0.108067877 |
| 14 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
55 |
1.6% |
0.016373921 |
| 15 |
None of these |
80 |
2.4% |
0.023816612 |
| 97 |
No answer |
96 |
2.9% |
0.028579935 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13 |
|
NA |
w02_P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
133 |
3.9% |
0.03944247 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
542 |
16.1% |
0.16073547 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
716 |
21.2% |
0.21233689 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
712 |
21.1% |
0.21115065 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
549 |
16.3% |
0.16281139 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
470 |
13.9% |
0.13938316 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
250 |
7.4% |
0.07413998 |
w02_P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
1391 |
41.3% |
0.41251483 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
1731 |
51.3% |
0.51334520 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
250 |
7.4% |
0.07413998 |
w02_k3
|
Variable label:
|
Voted following party at the elections [see codebook from Round 1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Obtained from wave 1 - w01_k3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3359] [Invalid:13]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
163 |
5.4% |
0.054098905 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
817 |
27.1% |
0.271158314 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
367 |
12.2% |
0.121805509 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
236 |
7.8% |
0.078327249 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
206 |
6.8% |
0.068370395 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
113 |
3.8% |
0.037504149 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
121 |
4.0% |
0.040159310 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
864 |
28.7% |
0.286757385 |
| 9 |
Red |
58 |
1.9% |
0.019249917 |
| 10 |
Other: |
41 |
1.4% |
0.013607700 |
| 97 |
No answer |
27 |
0.9% |
0.008961168 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
346 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
13 |
|
NA |
w02_k2
|
Variable label:
|
Voted in elections [see codebook from Round 1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Obtained from wave 1 - w01_k2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3359] [Invalid:13]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
3013 |
89.7% |
0.896993153 |
| 2 |
No |
338 |
10.1% |
0.100625186 |
| 3 |
Don't remember |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
0.2% |
0.002381661 |
| Sysmiss |
|
13 |
|
NA |
w02_weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2 and P1. See documentation report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]
|
w02_weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4_1 and P1. See documentation
report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-12]
|
w02_weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3372] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]
|
