Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Lund Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Dag Elgesem
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
|
Arjan Hille Schakel
|
UiB
|
|
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø
|
NORCE
|
|
Yvette Peters
|
UiB
|
|
Bjørn Sætrevik
|
UiB
|
|
Soran Hajo Dahl
|
UiB
|
|
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
|
UiB
|
Coordinating team
|
Name
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
|
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
|
|
Soran Hajo Dahl
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Universe: Norwegian Citizens above
the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in seven
waves:
In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 1).
In wave 3, 5 623 members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 3).
In wave 8, 4 245 new
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8).
In wave
11, 2 069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave
11).
In wave 14, 2 036 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 14).
In wave 16, 5 163 panel members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 16).
In wave 18, 2 048
panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 18).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry, while in wave 8 the
gross sample amounted to 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, 14, and 18, a
corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. In wave 16, the
gross sample was 34 000.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d)
gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from
previous waves:
https://nsd.no/nsddata/serier/norsk_medborgerpanel_eng.html
In wave 20, emails were sent out on 26th of January, 2021.
An e-mail with reminder was sent out three times, February 15th,
February 19th, and February 25th, respectively, to respondents who: a)
had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey.
Panel members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder
via text message. Panel members without registered phone number were
reminded by e-mail.
Wave 20 ended March 8th 2021.
Weighting
To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated.
The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population
and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata
in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns
values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will
receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a
weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the
documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information
regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are
based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample
file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information
regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when
answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weights are calculated
using the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized)
sub-groups, which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group
compared to the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, variable
columns are included in the dataset that indicates the proportion size
of strata in the population.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 20
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r20Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r20Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r20Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-102
|
2023-10-25
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 20
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-30
|
r20bk26
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2022-02-10
|
r20pk_vekst
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2021-06-07
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 20
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r20tdr8_a_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r20tdr8_a that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r20tdr8_b_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r20tdr8_b that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r20pk204_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r20pk204 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r20bk33_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r20bk33 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
v-100
|
2021-03-22
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 20
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 20 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
10421
|
|
# Variables
|
155
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r20rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-18]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Round 1 |
1525 |
14.6% |
0.14633912 |
| 3 |
Round 3 |
1661 |
15.9% |
0.15938969 |
| 8 |
Round 8 |
1574 |
15.1% |
0.15104117 |
| 11 |
Round 11 |
931 |
8.9% |
0.08933884 |
| 14 |
Round 14 |
915 |
8.8% |
0.08780347 |
| 16 |
Round 16 |
2640 |
25.3% |
0.25333461 |
| 18 |
Round 18 |
1175 |
11.3% |
0.11275309 |
r20group
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomization of sub-groups, with instructions. See value labels for
details]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 - no instructions |
2297 |
22.0% |
0.2204203 |
| 2 |
Group 2 - r18group is not 2 or 4 |
1693 |
16.2% |
0.1624604 |
| 3 |
Group 3 - r18group is not 2 or 4 |
1695 |
16.3% |
0.1626523 |
| 4 |
Group 4 - r18group is not 1 or 3 |
1308 |
12.6% |
0.1255158 |
| 5 |
Group 5 - r18group is not 1 or 3 |
1218 |
11.7% |
0.1168794 |
| 6 |
Group 6 - r18group equals 6 |
2210 |
21.2% |
0.2120718 |
r20interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r20interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10052] [Invalid:369]
[Range:-]
|
r20browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r20browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r20mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Mobile |
4311 |
41.4% |
0.4136839 |
| 0 |
Other |
6110 |
58.6% |
0.5863161 |
r20opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r20enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
6201 |
59.5% |
0.595048460 |
| 2 |
Touch |
4176 |
40.1% |
0.400729297 |
| 3 |
Generic |
44 |
0.4% |
0.004222244 |
r20advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r20getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r20pk15
|
Variable label:
|
Whether people in general can be trusted
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
83 |
0.8% |
0.007964687 |
| 1 |
1 |
55 |
0.5% |
0.005277804 |
| 2 |
2 |
148 |
1.4% |
0.014202092 |
| 3 |
3 |
242 |
2.3% |
0.023222340 |
| 4 |
4 |
338 |
3.2% |
0.032434507 |
| 5 |
5 |
882 |
8.5% |
0.084636791 |
| 6 |
6 |
900 |
8.6% |
0.086364073 |
| 7 |
7 |
2283 |
21.9% |
0.219076864 |
| 8 |
8 |
2866 |
27.5% |
0.275021591 |
| 9 |
9 |
1259 |
12.1% |
0.120813741 |
| 10 |
10 - Most people can be trusted |
1268 |
12.2% |
0.121677382 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
97 |
0.9% |
0.009308128 |
r20pktilfreds1
|
Variable label:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
2825 |
27.1% |
0.271087228 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
5994 |
57.5% |
0.575184723 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1245 |
11.9% |
0.119470300 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
276 |
2.6% |
0.026484982 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
39 |
0.4% |
0.003742443 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.4% |
0.004030323 |
r20pk9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The most important political issues for you personally (1)
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20pk9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The second most important political issues for you personally (2)
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20pk9_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open: The third most important political issues for you personally (3)
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20pk10
|
Variable label:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
2066 |
19.8% |
0.198253527 |
| 2 |
Good |
5328 |
51.1% |
0.511275309 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
1686 |
16.2% |
0.161788696 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
649 |
6.2% |
0.062278092 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
486 |
4.7% |
0.046636599 |
| 6 |
Bad |
156 |
1.5% |
0.014969773 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
18 |
0.2% |
0.001727281 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.3% |
0.003070723 |
r20tdr17
|
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in [region] compared with the rest of Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation in [region] with the rest of
Norway, do you consider the situation in [region] as better, worse or
the same?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Better |
2459 |
23.6% |
0.23596584 |
| 2 |
Worse |
1626 |
15.6% |
0.15603109 |
| 3 |
The same |
6209 |
59.6% |
0.59581614 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
127 |
1.2% |
0.01218693 |
r20pktilfreds4
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with democracy in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
1811 |
17.4% |
0.173783706 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
5883 |
56.5% |
0.564533154 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1980 |
19.0% |
0.190000960 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
558 |
5.4% |
0.053545725 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
145 |
1.4% |
0.013914212 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
0.4% |
0.004222244 |
r20pktilfreds3
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the present government in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
932 |
8.9% |
0.089434795 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
3614 |
34.7% |
0.346799731 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
3377 |
32.4% |
0.324057192 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
1828 |
17.5% |
0.175415027 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
596 |
5.7% |
0.057192208 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
0.7% |
0.007101046 |
r20pk204
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
283 |
2.7% |
0.027156703 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2429 |
23.3% |
0.233087036 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
573 |
5.5% |
0.054985126 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
294 |
2.8% |
0.028212264 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
998 |
9.6% |
0.095768160 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1725 |
16.6% |
0.165531139 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
592 |
5.7% |
0.056808368 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1825 |
17.5% |
0.175127147 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
556 |
5.3% |
0.053353805 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
160 |
1.5% |
0.015353613 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
244 |
2.3% |
0.023414260 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
227 |
2.2% |
0.021782938 |
| 13 |
Other: |
432 |
4.1% |
0.041454755 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
0.8% |
0.007964687 |
r20pk204_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
286 |
2.7% |
0.027444583 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2429 |
23.3% |
0.233087036 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
573 |
5.5% |
0.054985126 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
294 |
2.8% |
0.028212264 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
998 |
9.6% |
0.095768160 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1725 |
16.6% |
0.165531139 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
592 |
5.7% |
0.056808368 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1825 |
17.5% |
0.175127147 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
556 |
5.3% |
0.053353805 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
160 |
1.5% |
0.015353613 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
244 |
2.3% |
0.023414260 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
227 |
2.2% |
0.021782938 |
| 13 |
Other: |
429 |
4.1% |
0.041166875 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
0.8% |
0.007964687 |
r20pk204_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20tdr8_a
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
328 |
3.1% |
0.031474906 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2308 |
22.1% |
0.221475866 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
523 |
5.0% |
0.050187122 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
293 |
2.8% |
0.028116304 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
853 |
8.2% |
0.081853949 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1442 |
13.8% |
0.138374436 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
753 |
7.2% |
0.072257941 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2156 |
20.7% |
0.206889934 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
553 |
5.3% |
0.053065925 |
| 10 |
The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
99 |
1.0% |
0.009500048 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
14 |
0.1% |
0.001343441 |
| 12 |
A local list |
210 |
2.0% |
0.020151617 |
| 13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
202 |
1.9% |
0.019383936 |
| 14 |
Would not vote |
213 |
2.0% |
0.020439497 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
23 |
0.2% |
0.002207082 |
| 16 |
Other: |
358 |
3.4% |
0.034353709 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
93 |
0.9% |
0.008924287 |
r20tdr8_a_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler] [Added recoded values
from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
328 |
3.1% |
0.031474906 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2308 |
22.1% |
0.221475866 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
523 |
5.0% |
0.050187122 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
293 |
2.8% |
0.028116304 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
853 |
8.2% |
0.081853949 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1443 |
13.8% |
0.138470396 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
753 |
7.2% |
0.072257941 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2156 |
20.7% |
0.206889934 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
553 |
5.3% |
0.053065925 |
| 10 |
The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
99 |
1.0% |
0.009500048 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
14 |
0.1% |
0.001343441 |
| 12 |
A local list |
220 |
2.1% |
0.021111218 |
| 13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
202 |
1.9% |
0.019383936 |
| 14 |
Would not vote |
213 |
2.0% |
0.020439497 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
23 |
0.2% |
0.002207082 |
| 16 |
Other: |
347 |
3.3% |
0.033298148 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
93 |
0.9% |
0.008924287 |
r20tdr8_a_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for which party if municipal elections were to take
place tomorrow
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20tdr8_b
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
301 |
2.9% |
0.028883984 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2226 |
21.4% |
0.213607139 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
516 |
5.0% |
0.049515402 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
272 |
2.6% |
0.026101142 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
913 |
8.8% |
0.087611554 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1536 |
14.7% |
0.147394684 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
719 |
6.9% |
0.068995298 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1936 |
18.6% |
0.185778716 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
498 |
4.8% |
0.047788120 |
| 10 |
The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
92 |
0.9% |
0.008828327 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
16 |
0.2% |
0.001535361 |
| 12 |
A local list |
71 |
0.7% |
0.006813166 |
| 13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
290 |
2.8% |
0.027828423 |
| 14 |
Would not vote |
461 |
4.4% |
0.044237597 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
73 |
0.7% |
0.007005086 |
| 16 |
Other: |
362 |
3.5% |
0.034737549 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
139 |
1.3% |
0.013338451 |
r20tdr8_b_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler] [Added recoded values
from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
301 |
2.9% |
0.028883984 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2226 |
21.4% |
0.213607139 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
517 |
5.0% |
0.049611362 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
272 |
2.6% |
0.026101142 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
913 |
8.8% |
0.087611554 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1536 |
14.7% |
0.147394684 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
719 |
6.9% |
0.068995298 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1936 |
18.6% |
0.185778716 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
498 |
4.8% |
0.047788120 |
| 10 |
The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
92 |
0.9% |
0.008828327 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
16 |
0.2% |
0.001535361 |
| 12 |
A local list |
72 |
0.7% |
0.006909126 |
| 13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
290 |
2.8% |
0.027828423 |
| 14 |
Would not vote |
461 |
4.4% |
0.044237597 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
73 |
0.7% |
0.007005086 |
| 16 |
Other: |
360 |
3.5% |
0.034545629 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
139 |
1.3% |
0.013338451 |
r20tdr8_b_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for which party if county council elections were to
take place tomorrow
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20pk6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1828 |
17.5% |
0.175415027 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
2261 |
21.7% |
0.216965742 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2513 |
24.1% |
0.241147683 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1920 |
18.4% |
0.184243355 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1275 |
12.2% |
0.122349103 |
| 6 |
Really like |
379 |
3.6% |
0.036368871 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
93 |
0.9% |
0.008924287 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
152 |
1.5% |
0.014585932 |
r20pk6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
537 |
5.2% |
0.05153056 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1368 |
13.1% |
0.13127339 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1961 |
18.8% |
0.18817772 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1326 |
12.7% |
0.12724307 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2401 |
23.0% |
0.23040015 |
| 6 |
Really like |
2107 |
20.2% |
0.20218789 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
570 |
5.5% |
0.05469725 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
151 |
1.4% |
0.01448997 |
r20pk6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Progess Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
3357 |
32.2% |
0.32213799 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
2236 |
21.5% |
0.21456674 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1589 |
15.2% |
0.15248057 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
978 |
9.4% |
0.09384896 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1317 |
12.6% |
0.12637943 |
| 6 |
Really like |
645 |
6.2% |
0.06189425 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
154 |
1.5% |
0.01477785 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
145 |
1.4% |
0.01391421 |
r20pk6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1121 |
10.8% |
0.107571250 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1525 |
14.6% |
0.146339123 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2227 |
21.4% |
0.213703100 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2692 |
25.8% |
0.258324537 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2041 |
19.6% |
0.195854525 |
| 6 |
Really like |
556 |
5.3% |
0.053353805 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
70 |
0.7% |
0.006717206 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
189 |
1.8% |
0.018136455 |
r20pk6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Socialist Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1304 |
12.5% |
0.12513195 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1587 |
15.2% |
0.15228865 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1697 |
16.3% |
0.16284426 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1757 |
16.9% |
0.16860186 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2031 |
19.5% |
0.19489492 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1473 |
14.1% |
0.14134920 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
414 |
4.0% |
0.03972747 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
158 |
1.5% |
0.01516169 |
r20pk6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
538 |
5.2% |
0.05162652 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1020 |
9.8% |
0.09787928 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1749 |
16.8% |
0.16783418 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2060 |
19.8% |
0.19767777 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2776 |
26.6% |
0.26638518 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1697 |
16.3% |
0.16284426 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
435 |
4.2% |
0.04174264 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
146 |
1.4% |
0.01401017 |
r20pk6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2405 |
23.1% |
0.23078399 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1516 |
14.5% |
0.14547548 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1558 |
15.0% |
0.14950581 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1321 |
12.7% |
0.12676327 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2074 |
19.9% |
0.19902121 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1100 |
10.6% |
0.10555609 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
286 |
2.7% |
0.02744458 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
161 |
1.5% |
0.01544957 |
r20pk6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
452 |
4.3% |
0.04337396 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
884 |
8.5% |
0.08482871 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1819 |
17.5% |
0.17455139 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1758 |
16.9% |
0.16869782 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
3141 |
30.1% |
0.30141061 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1866 |
17.9% |
0.17906151 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
350 |
3.4% |
0.03358603 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
151 |
1.4% |
0.01448997 |
r20pk6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2242 |
21.5% |
0.21514250 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1667 |
16.0% |
0.15996545 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1482 |
14.2% |
0.14221284 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1763 |
16.9% |
0.16917762 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1850 |
17.8% |
0.17752615 |
| 6 |
Really like |
895 |
8.6% |
0.08588427 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
340 |
3.3% |
0.03262643 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
182 |
1.7% |
0.01746473 |
r20pkdv5
|
Variable label:
|
How great an advantage/disadvantage that immigrants come to live in
Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
522 |
5.0% |
0.050091162 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
2168 |
20.8% |
0.208041455 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
3991 |
38.3% |
0.382976682 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1489 |
14.3% |
0.142884560 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1438 |
13.8% |
0.137990596 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
479 |
4.6% |
0.045964879 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
301 |
2.9% |
0.028883984 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.3% |
0.003166683 |
r20pkmeme9
|
Variable label:
|
Should be easier/harder for refugees to be granted residence in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum
and their opportunity to be granted residence here?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much easier |
416 |
4.0% |
0.039919394 |
| 2 |
Easier |
1438 |
13.8% |
0.137990596 |
| 3 |
Somewhat easier |
2363 |
22.7% |
0.226753670 |
| 4 |
Same as today |
3374 |
32.4% |
0.323769312 |
| 5 |
Slightly more difficult |
1312 |
12.6% |
0.125899626 |
| 6 |
More difficult |
780 |
7.5% |
0.074848863 |
| 7 |
Much more difficult |
663 |
6.4% |
0.063621533 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
0.7% |
0.007197006 |
r20pk101
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion on Norway’s preconditions for integrating refugees
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian
society for integrating refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
789 |
7.6% |
0.075712504 |
| 2 |
Good |
3177 |
30.5% |
0.304865176 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
2222 |
21.3% |
0.213223299 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
1134 |
10.9% |
0.108818731 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poor |
1726 |
16.6% |
0.165627099 |
| 6 |
Poor |
953 |
9.1% |
0.091449957 |
| 7 |
Very poor |
348 |
3.3% |
0.033394108 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
0.7% |
0.006909126 |
r20meme50
|
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008510638 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
26 |
2.2% |
0.022127660 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
96 |
8.2% |
0.081702128 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
350 |
29.8% |
0.297872340 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
305 |
26.0% |
0.259574468 |
| 6 |
Really like |
300 |
25.5% |
0.255319149 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
78 |
6.6% |
0.066382979 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008510638 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9246 |
|
NA |
r20pk12
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
1268 |
12.2% |
0.121677382 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
5714 |
54.8% |
0.548315901 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
2739 |
26.3% |
0.262834661 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
542 |
5.2% |
0.052010364 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
130 |
1.2% |
0.012474810 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.3% |
0.002686882 |
r20pk53
|
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
430 |
4.1% |
0.041262835 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
4387 |
42.1% |
0.420976874 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
4377 |
42.0% |
0.420017273 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
954 |
9.2% |
0.091545917 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
223 |
2.1% |
0.021399098 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
0.5% |
0.004798004 |
r20pk54
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
726 |
7.0% |
0.069667019 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
4663 |
44.7% |
0.447461856 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
3810 |
36.6% |
0.365607907 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
889 |
8.5% |
0.085308512 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
288 |
2.8% |
0.027636503 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
0.4% |
0.004318204 |
r20pk_sentral
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Government authorities show little consideration for
non-urban/rural Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1649 |
15.8% |
0.158238173 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2664 |
25.6% |
0.255637655 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2922 |
28.0% |
0.280395356 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1509 |
14.5% |
0.144803762 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
758 |
7.3% |
0.072737741 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
674 |
6.5% |
0.064677094 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
186 |
1.8% |
0.017848575 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
0.6% |
0.005661645 |
r20pk60
|
Variable label:
|
Proposition: The Government should work more to significantly reduce
income differences
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income
differences in society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3110 |
29.8% |
0.298435851 |
| 2 |
Agree |
3086 |
29.6% |
0.296132809 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2187 |
21.0% |
0.209864696 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1001 |
9.6% |
0.096056041 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
559 |
5.4% |
0.053641685 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
321 |
3.1% |
0.030803186 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
90 |
0.9% |
0.008636407 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.6% |
0.006429325 |
r20pkmeme21
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual
attention
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own
responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
146 |
1.4% |
0.014010172 |
| 2 |
Agree |
370 |
3.6% |
0.035505230 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1326 |
12.7% |
0.127243067 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1036 |
9.9% |
0.099414644 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1161 |
11.1% |
0.111409654 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
3073 |
29.5% |
0.294885328 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3250 |
31.2% |
0.311870262 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
0.6% |
0.005661645 |
r20pk52
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More measures to protect citizens from terrorist
threats, even at the expense of privacy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from
potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of
privacy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
109 |
9.3% |
0.092765957 |
| 2 |
Agree |
249 |
21.2% |
0.211914894 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
357 |
30.4% |
0.303829787 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
161 |
13.7% |
0.137021277 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
148 |
12.6% |
0.125957447 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
98 |
8.3% |
0.083404255 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
45 |
3.8% |
0.038297872 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006808511 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9246 |
|
NA |
r20pkby3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
282 |
2.7% |
0.027060743 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
1257 |
12.1% |
0.120621821 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
4692 |
45.0% |
0.450244698 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
3654 |
35.1% |
0.350638135 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
481 |
4.6% |
0.046156799 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
0.5% |
0.005277804 |
r20pk103
|
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
1122 |
10.8% |
0.10766721 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
3013 |
28.9% |
0.28912772 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
3281 |
31.5% |
0.31484502 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1133 |
10.9% |
0.10872277 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1014 |
9.7% |
0.09730352 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
495 |
4.8% |
0.04750024 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
238 |
2.3% |
0.02283850 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
125 |
1.2% |
0.01199501 |
r20pkkm2
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all concerned |
546 |
5.2% |
0.052394204 |
| 2 |
Not very concerned |
1614 |
15.5% |
0.154879570 |
| 3 |
Slightly concerned |
3223 |
30.9% |
0.309279340 |
| 4 |
Very concerned |
3266 |
31.3% |
0.313405623 |
| 5 |
Extremely concerned |
1723 |
16.5% |
0.165339219 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
49 |
0.5% |
0.004702044 |
r20kmtech
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Technological innovations will solve climate problems
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statement below. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will solve climate problems.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
51 |
2.0% |
0.020190024 |
| 2 |
Agree |
272 |
10.8% |
0.107680127 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
990 |
39.2% |
0.391923990 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
545 |
21.6% |
0.215756136 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
304 |
12.0% |
0.120348377 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
270 |
10.7% |
0.106888361 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
78 |
3.1% |
0.030878860 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.6% |
0.006334125 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20pkkm42
|
Variable label:
|
Proposal: From 2025, all new private vehicles should be either electric
or run on hydrogen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private
vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from
2025.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
|
Post-question:
|
See National Transport Plan 2018-2029, page 16 accessible here (external
url)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run
on hydrogen |
3274 |
31.4% |
0.31417330 |
| 2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol. |
7038 |
67.5% |
0.67536705 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
109 |
1.0% |
0.01045965 |
r20pkkm4
|
Variable label:
|
Whether we should not allow oil and gas extraction in the
Lofoten/Vesterålen/Senja areas
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree
with this?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen
and Senja areas.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3343 |
32.1% |
0.320794549 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2020 |
19.4% |
0.193839363 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1208 |
11.6% |
0.115919777 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1448 |
13.9% |
0.138950197 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
936 |
9.0% |
0.089818635 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
840 |
8.1% |
0.080606468 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
551 |
5.3% |
0.052874004 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
0.7% |
0.007197006 |
r20skepsis
|
Variable label:
|
Your view on climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I don’t believe that the climate is changing. |
58 |
0.6% |
0.005565685 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
403 |
3.9% |
0.038671912 |
| 3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent
due to human action |
2341 |
22.5% |
0.224642549 |
| 4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to
human action. |
7512 |
72.1% |
0.720852126 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
107 |
1.0% |
0.010267729 |
r20pk_vekst
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of
industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of
industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
287 |
2.8% |
0.027540543 |
| 2 |
Agree |
870 |
8.3% |
0.083485270 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2099 |
20.1% |
0.201420209 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1253 |
12.0% |
0.120237981 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
2274 |
21.8% |
0.218213223 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2327 |
22.3% |
0.223299108 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1227 |
11.8% |
0.117743019 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
84 |
0.8% |
0.008060647 |
r20km20_efficacy
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent it is possible to do something to prevent harmful climate
change
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let’s assume that climate change could become a major threat to the
world in the future if no action is taken.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you believe it is possible to do something to prevent
harmful climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 1]
[Asked on the same page as r20km20_efficacy2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
There is nothing we can do to prevent harmful climate change |
94 |
4.1% |
0.040922943 |
| 2 |
It is possible, but very difficult to do something to prevent harmful climate
change |
1019 |
44.4% |
0.443622116 |
| 3 |
It is possible and completely realistic to do something to prevent harmful
climate change |
1071 |
46.6% |
0.466260340 |
| 4 |
It is easy to prevent harmful climate change |
14 |
0.6% |
0.006094906 |
| 5 |
I do not consider climate change to be a problem |
79 |
3.4% |
0.034392686 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.9% |
0.008707009 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8124 |
|
NA |
r20km20_efficacy2
|
Variable label:
|
Has the Corona pandemic changed your views on the possibilities to
prevent harmful climate change?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Action to stop the spread of COVID-19 has required political
decision-making on both a national and international scale, and we have
had to make major changes to our lifestyle.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Has the Corona pandemic changed your views on whether it is possible
to do something to prevent harmful climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 1]
[Asked on the same page as r20km20_efficacy]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am much more confident now that something can be done |
223 |
9.7% |
0.09708315 |
| 2 |
I am slightly more confident now that something can be done |
814 |
35.4% |
0.35437527 |
| 3 |
I am slightly less confident now that something can be done |
136 |
5.9% |
0.05920766 |
| 4 |
I am much less confident now that something can be done |
24 |
1.0% |
0.01044841 |
| 5 |
No, the Corona pandemic has not changed my views |
1070 |
46.6% |
0.46582499 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01306051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8124 |
|
NA |
r20polkom1_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses if respondent is asked r20polkom1a,
r20polkom1b or neither (control)]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2287] [Invalid:8134]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
r20polkom1a |
781 |
34.1% |
0.3414954 |
| 2 |
r20polkom1b |
728 |
31.8% |
0.3183209 |
| 3 |
[NONE - control] |
778 |
34.0% |
0.3401836 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8134 |
|
NA |
r20polkom1a
|
Variable label:
|
Political conflict: Whether you have heard/read certain statements by
politicians relating to the terrorist attacks on 22 July
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[PAGE 1 - intro]
The terrorist attacks on July 22, 2011 are at times covered in the
news. You will now be presented with excerpts from such a case. Please
read the text on the next page carefully.
[PAGE 2 - question]
Miriam Einangshaug, Utøya survivor and local body politician for the
Green Party Norway wrote in a debate contribution on 9 March 2020: “If
the Progress Party (FrP) feels it is so terribly problematic that
parallels are drawn to terrorists and right-wing extremists, they should
perhaps refrain from allowing persons who maintain such views to assume
positions of power. They have to stop adopting policy that takes them
more in the direction of right-wing nationalism. No. We learned nothing
from 22 July.”
In response, Siv Jensen, at that time leader of the Progress Party,
wrote that: “What is harmful here is comparing the completely legitimate
views held by most people on this subject with the view of the world
held by right-wing terrorists. How can it be that all those advocating a
restrictive immigration policy are lumped together with right-wing
terrorists after tragic events, but when Islamists commit terrorism, we
are told not to treat all Muslims as one?”
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard/read these or similar statements in which politicians
express such opinions relating to the terrorist attacks on 22 July?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20polkom1_ran = 1 & r20group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
390 |
49.9% |
0.499359795 |
| 2 |
No |
246 |
31.5% |
0.314980794 |
| 3 |
Don’t know |
141 |
18.1% |
0.180537772 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.5% |
0.005121639 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9640 |
|
NA |
r20polkom1b
|
Variable label:
|
Political unity: Whether you have heard/read certain statements by
politicians relating to the terrorist attacks on 22 July
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[PAGE 1 - intro]
The terrorist attacks on July 22, 2011 are at times covered in the
news. You will now be presented with excerpts from such a case. Please
read the text on the next page carefully.
[PAGE 2 - question]
In a speech on 22 July 2020, Prime Minister Erna Solberg of the
Conservative Party said that “The evil of terrorists shall never silence
us. Shall never be allowed to threaten our freedom. Because our response
is that we will not be oppressed. Our response is that we will fight
together. Our response is to defend our sense of community and our
democracy when others try to divide us. When met with evil, let this be
our message.”
During the same event, Leader of the Labour Party’s Youth Organisation
(AUF) and Utøya survivor, Ina Libak, said that: “Hate kills. But we know
that the best antidote to hate is love, hope and community. Love for
each other. The hope for a better future and a community for everyone.
Love, hope and community can never be exhausted.”
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard/read these or similar statements in which politicians
express such opinions relating to the terrorist attacks on 22 July?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20polkom1_ran = 2 & r20group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
496 |
68.1% |
0.681318681 |
| 2 |
No |
130 |
17.9% |
0.178571429 |
| 3 |
Don’t know |
100 |
13.7% |
0.137362637 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002747253 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9693 |
|
NA |
r20polkom2
|
Variable label:
|
Do the terrorist attacks on 22 July 2011 generate political conflict
today?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what degree do you feel that the terrorist attacks on 22 July 2011
generate political conflict today?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 1]
[Asked on the same page as r20polkom3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
22 |
1.0% |
0.00957771 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
104 |
4.5% |
0.04527645 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
827 |
36.0% |
0.36003483 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
1079 |
47.0% |
0.46974314 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
241 |
10.5% |
0.10491946 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.0% |
0.01044841 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8124 |
|
NA |
r20polkom3
|
Variable label:
|
How serious do you feel the political conflict relating to the terrorist
attacks on 22 July 2011 is today?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How serious do you feel this political conflict is today?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r20polkom2 = 1 | r20polkom2 = 2 | r20polkom2 = 3) &
r20group = 1]
[Asked on the same page as r20polkom2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
17 |
1.8% |
0.017838405 |
| 2 |
Serious |
199 |
20.9% |
0.208814271 |
| 3 |
Fairly serious |
473 |
49.6% |
0.496327387 |
| 4 |
Not very serious |
251 |
26.3% |
0.263378804 |
| 5 |
Not serious at all |
5 |
0.5% |
0.005246590 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.8% |
0.008394544 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9468 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsfamiliar
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard that CO2 can be captured and stored, so called carbon
capture and storage?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard that CO2 (carbon dioxide) can be captured and stored, so
called carbon capture and storage (CCS)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No, I have not heard about this |
350 |
13.9% |
0.138558987 |
| 2 |
Yes, I have heard a little about this |
1439 |
57.0% |
0.569675376 |
| 3 |
Yes, I have heard a lot about this |
717 |
28.4% |
0.283847981 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.8% |
0.007917656 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsvignette_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
r20kmccsvignette]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 4,5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2512] [Invalid:7909]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Carbon capture and storage can be used to significantly reduce CO2 emissions
by 2050, thus helping us achieve the goal of keeping global warming below 2
degrees. |
677 |
27.0% |
0.2695064 |
| 2 |
Carbon capture and storage are necessary if we are both to sustain our current
lifestyles and at the same time significantly reduce emissions of CO2 by 2050.
Without this technology, we will have to make drastic changes to our lifestyles
in order to achieve the goal of keeping global warming below 2 degrees. |
623 |
24.8% |
0.2480096 |
| 3 |
Carbon capture and storage are absolutely essential in sustaining certain
types of services that are of critical importance for society, such as waste
incineration. Without this technology, we lack the processes to both handle
waste in an eco-friendly manner and help us significantly reduce CO2 emission by
2050, so that we can achieve the goal of keeping global warming below 2 degrees. |
608 |
24.2% |
0.2420382 |
| 4 |
Carbon capture and storage can generate technological developments and new jobs
in Norway. This is valuable as there will be a loss of jobs in sectors with high
emissions if we are to significantly reduce our CO2 emissions by 2050. This
technology helps us transform our economy, while allowing us to achieve the goal
of keeping global warming below 2 degrees. |
604 |
24.0% |
0.2404459 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7909 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsvignette
|
Variable label:
|
Are you for or against capture and long-term storage of CO2 under the
seabed in the North Sea?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the Paris Agreement of 2015, the majority of countries worldwide
agreed to keep the increase in global average temperature to between 1.5
and 2 degrees. To achieve this goal, CO2 emissions (carbon dioxide) must
be reduced to zero by 2050. Carbon capture and storage (often
abbreviated to CCS) is a process in which CO2 is captured and stored
deep under the ground. This helps us reduce CO2 emissions to the
atmosphere, a common cause of climate change.
[r20kmccsvignette_ran]
We have good areas for storage of CO2 under the seabed in the North
Sea off the coast of Norway. CO2 captured in European countries can be
transported by ship and stored there. This could help Norway and several
European countries reduce their emissions to zero by 2050.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you for or against capture and long-term storage of CO2 under the
seabed in the North Sea?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Display order of answer list: Random direction (1 -> 5, 5 -> 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly for |
222 |
8.8% |
0.08788599 |
| 2 |
For |
966 |
38.2% |
0.38242280 |
| 3 |
Against |
327 |
12.9% |
0.12945368 |
| 4 |
Strongly against |
132 |
5.2% |
0.05225653 |
| 5 |
No opinion / don’t know |
843 |
33.4% |
0.33372922 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
1.4% |
0.01425178 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsrisks_1
|
Variable label:
|
Fits your views of the technology: CCS is safe for life in the sea
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are several statements regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS).
How do these statements fit your views of this technology?
|
|
Literal question:
|
CCS is safe for life in the sea
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
63 |
2.5% |
0.02494062 |
| 2 |
Agree |
524 |
20.7% |
0.20744260 |
| 3 |
Disagree |
391 |
15.5% |
0.15479018 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
140 |
5.5% |
0.05542359 |
| 5 |
No opinion |
1291 |
51.1% |
0.51108472 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
117 |
4.6% |
0.04631829 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsrisks_2
|
Variable label:
|
Fits your views of the technology: CO2 transport represents a risk
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are several statements regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS).
How do these statements fit your views of this technology?
|
|
Literal question:
|
CO2 transport represents a risk
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
72 |
2.9% |
0.02850356 |
| 2 |
Agree |
554 |
21.9% |
0.21931908 |
| 3 |
Disagree |
506 |
20.0% |
0.20031671 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
169 |
6.7% |
0.06690420 |
| 5 |
No opinion |
1111 |
44.0% |
0.43982581 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
114 |
4.5% |
0.04513064 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsrisks_3
|
Variable label:
|
Fits your views of the technology: Realistic to believe that full-scale
introduction of CCS will be successful
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are several statements regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS).
How do these statements fit your views of this technology?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is realistic to believe that full-scale introduction of CCS will be
successful
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
51 |
2.0% |
0.02019002 |
| 2 |
Agree |
776 |
30.7% |
0.30720507 |
| 3 |
Disagree |
310 |
12.3% |
0.12272367 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
143 |
5.7% |
0.05661124 |
| 5 |
No opinion |
1127 |
44.6% |
0.44615994 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
119 |
4.7% |
0.04711006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsrisks_4
|
Variable label:
|
Fits your views of the technology: CCS is good for the climate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are several statements regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS).
How do these statements fit your views of this technology?
|
|
Literal question:
|
CCS is good for the climate
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
147 |
5.8% |
0.05819477 |
| 2 |
Agree |
985 |
39.0% |
0.38994458 |
| 3 |
Disagree |
235 |
9.3% |
0.09303246 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
111 |
4.4% |
0.04394299 |
| 5 |
No opinion |
930 |
36.8% |
0.36817102 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
118 |
4.7% |
0.04671417 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsrisks_5
|
Variable label:
|
Fits your views of the technology: Storage of CO2 underground seems
frightening
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are several statements regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS).
How do these statements fit your views of this technology?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Storage of CO2 underground seems frightening
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
133 |
5.3% |
0.05265241 |
| 2 |
Agree |
698 |
27.6% |
0.27632621 |
| 3 |
Disagree |
647 |
25.6% |
0.25613618 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
268 |
10.6% |
0.10609660 |
| 5 |
No opinion |
669 |
26.5% |
0.26484561 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
111 |
4.4% |
0.04394299 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsrisks_6
|
Variable label:
|
Fits your views of the technology: CCS inhibits the green shift
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are several statements regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS).
How do these statements fit your views of this technology?
|
|
Literal question:
|
CCS inhibits the green shift
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
70 |
2.8% |
0.02771180 |
| 2 |
Agree |
388 |
15.4% |
0.15360253 |
| 3 |
Disagree |
733 |
29.0% |
0.29018211 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
204 |
8.1% |
0.08076010 |
| 5 |
No opinion |
1013 |
40.1% |
0.40102930 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
118 |
4.7% |
0.04671417 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20_psykpr_1
|
Variable label:
|
How high risk that: you will become infected by the coronavirus
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… you will become infected by the coronavirus?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very low |
418 |
18.9% |
0.189140271 |
| 2 |
Somewhat low |
864 |
39.1% |
0.390950226 |
| 3 |
Medium |
704 |
31.9% |
0.318552036 |
| 4 |
Somewhat high |
177 |
8.0% |
0.080090498 |
| 5 |
Very high |
31 |
1.4% |
0.014027149 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.7% |
0.007239819 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20_psykpr_2
|
Variable label:
|
How high risk that: an average adult in Norway will become infected
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… an average adult in Norway will become infected?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very low |
140 |
6.3% |
0.06334842 |
| 2 |
Somewhat low |
723 |
32.7% |
0.32714932 |
| 3 |
Medium |
1027 |
46.5% |
0.46470588 |
| 4 |
Somewhat high |
250 |
11.3% |
0.11312217 |
| 5 |
Very high |
40 |
1.8% |
0.01809955 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.4% |
0.01357466 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykc1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I worry that I will get infected by the coronavirus
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I worry that I will get infected by the coronavirus.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
296 |
13.4% |
0.133936652 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
704 |
31.9% |
0.318552036 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
540 |
24.4% |
0.244343891 |
| 4 |
Agree |
577 |
26.1% |
0.261085973 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
74 |
3.3% |
0.033484163 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.008597285 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykc1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I worry that someone in my family will get infected by
the coronavirus
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I worry that someone in my family will get infected by the coronavirus.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
133 |
6.0% |
0.060180995 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
362 |
16.4% |
0.163800905 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
373 |
16.9% |
0.168778281 |
| 4 |
Agree |
1038 |
47.0% |
0.469683258 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
285 |
12.9% |
0.128959276 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.008597285 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykc2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I will deal with the challenges that I will face due to
the coronavirus outbreak
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am optimistic that I will deal with the challenges that I will face
due to the coronavirus outbreak.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
36 |
1.6% |
0.016289593 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
76 |
3.4% |
0.034389140 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
339 |
15.3% |
0.153393665 |
| 4 |
Agree |
1292 |
58.5% |
0.584615385 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
448 |
20.3% |
0.202714932 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.008597285 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykac1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I do my best to follow the health authorities’ advice to
limit the risk of infection
|
|
Literal question:
|
I do my best to follow the health authorities’ advice to limit the risk
of infection (wash my hands frequently, avoid travel and situations
involving contact with other people, keep distance and avoid touching
things).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
59 |
2.7% |
0.026696833 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004524887 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
42 |
1.9% |
0.019004525 |
| 4 |
Agree |
722 |
32.7% |
0.326696833 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
1356 |
61.4% |
0.613574661 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.0% |
0.009502262 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykac_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in
r20cov_psykac_1-3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2201] [Invalid:8220]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
strangers |
1117 |
50.7% |
0.5074966 |
| 2 |
those who are not members of my closest family |
1084 |
49.3% |
0.4925034 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8220 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykac_1
|
Variable label:
|
The last two weeks I have: washed my hands every time I have been out
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The last two weeks I have…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…washed my hands every time I have been out
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Always |
1292 |
58.5% |
0.5846153846 |
| 2 |
Almost always |
623 |
28.2% |
0.2819004525 |
| 3 |
Often |
194 |
8.8% |
0.0877828054 |
| 4 |
Sometimes |
66 |
3.0% |
0.0298642534 |
| 5 |
Rarely |
10 |
0.5% |
0.0045248869 |
| 6 |
Almost never |
7 |
0.3% |
0.0031674208 |
| 7 |
Never |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009049774 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.7% |
0.0072398190 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykac_2
|
Variable label:
|
The last two weeks I have: kept a distance of 1 metre [from all
strangers/those who are not members of my closest family]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The last two weeks I have…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…kept a distance of 1 metre [from all strangers/those who are not
members of my closest family]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Always |
1082 |
49.0% |
0.4895927602 |
| 2 |
Almost always |
893 |
40.4% |
0.4040723982 |
| 3 |
Often |
192 |
8.7% |
0.0868778281 |
| 4 |
Sometimes |
19 |
0.9% |
0.0085972851 |
| 5 |
Rarely |
5 |
0.2% |
0.0022624434 |
| 6 |
Almost never |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0004524887 |
| 7 |
Never |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009049774 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.7% |
0.0072398190 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykac_3
|
Variable label:
|
The last two weeks I have: avoided all social situations with
[strangers/those who are not members of my closest family]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The last two weeks I have…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…avoided all social situations with [strangers/those who are not members
of my closest family]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Always |
1109 |
50.2% |
0.5018099548 |
| 2 |
Almost always |
683 |
30.9% |
0.3090497738 |
| 3 |
Often |
293 |
13.3% |
0.1325791855 |
| 4 |
Sometimes |
71 |
3.2% |
0.0321266968 |
| 5 |
Rarely |
24 |
1.1% |
0.0108597285 |
| 6 |
Almost never |
9 |
0.4% |
0.0040723982 |
| 7 |
Never |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009049774 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.0085972851 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_1
|
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: obliged to work from home
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or
inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
|
Literal question:
|
… obliged to work from home
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
1391 |
62.9% |
0.62941176 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
331 |
15.0% |
0.14977376 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
279 |
12.6% |
0.12624434 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
80 |
3.6% |
0.03619910 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
41 |
1.9% |
0.01855204 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
88 |
4.0% |
0.03981900 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_2
|
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: schools and kindergartens closed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or
inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
|
Literal question:
|
… schools and kindergartens closed
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
1476 |
66.8% |
0.66787330 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
265 |
12.0% |
0.11990950 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
241 |
10.9% |
0.10904977 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
86 |
3.9% |
0.03891403 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
56 |
2.5% |
0.02533937 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
86 |
3.9% |
0.03891403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_3
|
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: obligation to wear a face mask
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or
inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
|
Literal question:
|
… obligation to wear a face mask
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
1095 |
49.5% |
0.49547511 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
662 |
30.0% |
0.29954751 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
297 |
13.4% |
0.13438914 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
77 |
3.5% |
0.03484163 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
48 |
2.2% |
0.02171946 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.4% |
0.01402715 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_4
|
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: restrictions on social gatherings
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or
inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
|
Literal question:
|
… restrictions on social gatherings
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
450 |
20.4% |
0.20361991 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
507 |
22.9% |
0.22941176 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
755 |
34.2% |
0.34162896 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
338 |
15.3% |
0.15294118 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
136 |
6.2% |
0.06153846 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.1% |
0.01085973 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_5
|
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: advice regarding washing hands and keeping
distance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or
inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
|
Literal question:
|
… advice regarding washing hands and keeping distance
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
1469 |
66.5% |
0.66470588 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
521 |
23.6% |
0.23574661 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
140 |
6.3% |
0.06334842 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
32 |
1.4% |
0.01447964 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
23 |
1.0% |
0.01040724 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.1% |
0.01131222 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_6
|
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: travel restrictions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or
inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
|
Literal question:
|
… travel restrictions
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
663 |
30.0% |
0.30000000 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
521 |
23.6% |
0.23574661 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
577 |
26.1% |
0.26108597 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
271 |
12.3% |
0.12262443 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
154 |
7.0% |
0.06968326 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.1% |
0.01085973 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_7
|
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: quarantine and obligatory isolation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or
inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
|
Literal question:
|
… quarantine and obligatory isolation after travel or suspected
infection
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
1538 |
69.6% |
0.69592760 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
335 |
15.2% |
0.15158371 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
172 |
7.8% |
0.07782805 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
54 |
2.4% |
0.02443439 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
51 |
2.3% |
0.02307692 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
2.7% |
0.02714932 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20pk14
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Sometimes politics is so complicated that it’s hard to
understand
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not
understand what it’s about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
38 |
3.2% |
0.032340426 |
| 2 |
Agree |
117 |
10.0% |
0.099574468 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
303 |
25.8% |
0.257872340 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
102 |
8.7% |
0.086808511 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
141 |
12.0% |
0.120000000 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
323 |
27.5% |
0.274893617 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
140 |
11.9% |
0.119148936 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.9% |
0.009361702 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9246 |
|
NA |
r20pk13
|
Variable label:
|
Whether the political system in Norway allows you to have a say
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like
you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
13 |
1.1% |
0.01106383 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
157 |
13.4% |
0.13361702 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
559 |
47.6% |
0.47574468 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
362 |
30.8% |
0.30808511 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
69 |
5.9% |
0.05872340 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
1.3% |
0.01276596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9246 |
|
NA |
r20bk35
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 18]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
2387 |
25.8% |
0.258165693 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
1849 |
20.0% |
0.199978369 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
2545 |
27.5% |
0.275254164 |
| 4 |
A village |
1414 |
15.3% |
0.152930997 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
984 |
10.6% |
0.106424400 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.7% |
0.007246377 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1175 |
|
NA |
r20pk8
|
Variable label:
|
Your position on the political left-right scale
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People often talk about “left wing” and “right wing” politics. Below is
a scale where 0 represents those who are very much politically left
wing, while 10 represents those who are very much politically right
wing.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 18]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Left wing |
154 |
1.7% |
0.01665585 |
| 1 |
1 |
398 |
4.3% |
0.04304564 |
| 2 |
2 |
1009 |
10.9% |
0.10912827 |
| 3 |
3 |
1372 |
14.8% |
0.14838849 |
| 4 |
4 |
1063 |
11.5% |
0.11496864 |
| 5 |
5 |
1351 |
14.6% |
0.14611724 |
| 6 |
6 |
1060 |
11.5% |
0.11464417 |
| 7 |
7 |
1307 |
14.1% |
0.14135843 |
| 8 |
8 |
1027 |
11.1% |
0.11107506 |
| 9 |
9 |
232 |
2.5% |
0.02509193 |
| 10 |
10 - Right wing |
137 |
1.5% |
0.01481722 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
136 |
1.5% |
0.01470906 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1175 |
|
NA |
r20oc_h2
|
Variable label:
|
Your position on the economic left-right scale
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about right-wing economics and
left-wing economics.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means
left-wing in relation to economic issues and 10 means right-wing in
relation to economic issues?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Left wing |
88 |
2.6% |
0.02597403 |
| 1 |
1 |
140 |
4.1% |
0.04132231 |
| 2 |
2 |
327 |
9.7% |
0.09651712 |
| 3 |
3 |
446 |
13.2% |
0.13164109 |
| 4 |
4 |
359 |
10.6% |
0.10596222 |
| 5 |
5 |
603 |
17.8% |
0.17798111 |
| 6 |
6 |
384 |
11.3% |
0.11334120 |
| 7 |
7 |
449 |
13.3% |
0.13252656 |
| 8 |
8 |
327 |
9.7% |
0.09651712 |
| 9 |
9 |
101 |
3.0% |
0.02981110 |
| 10 |
10 - Right wing |
60 |
1.8% |
0.01770956 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
104 |
3.1% |
0.03069658 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7033 |
|
NA |
r20bkhelse
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
1441 |
13.8% |
0.138278476 |
| 2 |
Very good |
3692 |
35.4% |
0.354284618 |
| 3 |
Good |
3641 |
34.9% |
0.349390653 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
1272 |
12.2% |
0.122061223 |
| 5 |
Poor |
290 |
2.8% |
0.027828423 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
85 |
0.8% |
0.008156607 |
r20bk33
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best applies to what you have been doing for the last
7 days?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-14]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
100% furloughed by employer |
56 |
0.5% |
0.0053737645 |
| 2 |
Partially furloughed by employer |
57 |
0.5% |
0.0054697246 |
| 3 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
4615 |
44.3% |
0.4428557720 |
| 4 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
319 |
3.1% |
0.0306112657 |
| 5 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
324 |
3.1% |
0.0310910661 |
| 6 |
Self-employed |
438 |
4.2% |
0.0420305153 |
| 7 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
273 |
2.6% |
0.0261971020 |
| 8 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
104 |
1.0% |
0.0099798484 |
| 9 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
41 |
0.4% |
0.0039343633 |
| 10 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
524 |
5.0% |
0.0502830822 |
| 11 |
Retired |
3267 |
31.4% |
0.3135015833 |
| 12 |
In military service |
5 |
0.0% |
0.0004798004 |
| 13 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
43 |
0.4% |
0.0041262835 |
| 14 |
Other: |
272 |
2.6% |
0.0261011419 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
0.8% |
0.0079646867 |
r20bk33_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best applies to what you have been doing for the last
7 days? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-14]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
100% furloughed by employer |
57 |
0.5% |
0.0054697246 |
| 2 |
Partially furloughed by employer |
58 |
0.6% |
0.0055656847 |
| 3 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
4637 |
44.5% |
0.4449668938 |
| 4 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
330 |
3.2% |
0.0316668266 |
| 5 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
360 |
3.5% |
0.0345456290 |
| 6 |
Self-employed |
451 |
4.3% |
0.0432779964 |
| 7 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
294 |
2.8% |
0.0282122637 |
| 8 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
117 |
1.1% |
0.0112273294 |
| 9 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
44 |
0.4% |
0.0042222435 |
| 10 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
566 |
5.4% |
0.0543134056 |
| 11 |
Retired |
3313 |
31.8% |
0.3179157470 |
| 12 |
In military service |
6 |
0.1% |
0.0005757605 |
| 13 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
48 |
0.5% |
0.0046060839 |
| 14 |
Other: |
53 |
0.5% |
0.0050858843 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
0.8% |
0.0083485270 |
r20bk33_14_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which description best applies to what you have been doing for
the last 7 days?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20permittert
|
Variable label:
|
Have you been furloughed or have you lost your job due to the Corona
pandemic?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you been furloughed or have you lost your job due to the Corona
pandemic?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I am 100% furloughed now |
83 |
0.8% |
0.007964687 |
| 2 |
Yes, I have been 100% furloughed, but not any longer |
210 |
2.0% |
0.020151617 |
| 3 |
Yes, I am partially furloughed now |
82 |
0.8% |
0.007868727 |
| 4 |
Yes, I have been partially furloughed, but not any longer |
256 |
2.5% |
0.024565781 |
| 5 |
Yes, I lost my job and am unemployed |
53 |
0.5% |
0.005085884 |
| 6 |
Yes, I lost my job but am no longer unemployed |
46 |
0.4% |
0.004414164 |
| 7 |
No |
9431 |
90.5% |
0.904999520 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
260 |
2.5% |
0.024949621 |
r20permittert_b
|
Variable label:
|
How long in total have you been on furlough/unemployed due to the Corona
pandemic?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How long in total have you been on furlough/unemployed due to the Corona
pandemic?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r20permittert = 1 | r20permittert = 2 | r20permittert = 3 |
r20permittert = 4 | r20permittert = 5 | r20permittert = 6)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than one month |
127 |
17.4% |
0.173972603 |
| 2 |
Between 1 to 3 months |
330 |
45.2% |
0.452054795 |
| 3 |
Between 3 to 6 months |
112 |
15.3% |
0.153424658 |
| 4 |
More than 6 months |
154 |
21.1% |
0.210958904 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
1.0% |
0.009589041 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9691 |
|
NA |
r20bk26
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
21 |
0.2% |
0.002015162 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
449 |
4.3% |
0.043086076 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
890 |
8.5% |
0.085404472 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1206 |
11.6% |
0.115727857 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
969 |
9.3% |
0.092985318 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
868 |
8.3% |
0.083293350 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2189 |
21.0% |
0.210056616 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
762 |
7.3% |
0.073121581 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
751 |
7.2% |
0.072066021 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of
Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of
Science in Business and Economics)) |
1798 |
17.3% |
0.172536225 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
284 |
2.7% |
0.027252663 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
123 |
1.2% |
0.011803090 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
111 |
1.1% |
0.010651569 |
r20bk26_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
None of the above (please enter):
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20bk25
|
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
<150 000 |
411 |
3.9% |
0.03943959 |
| 2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
1162 |
11.2% |
0.11150561 |
| 3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
1574 |
15.1% |
0.15104117 |
| 4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1662 |
15.9% |
0.15948565 |
| 5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
1777 |
17.1% |
0.17052106 |
| 6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
1319 |
12.7% |
0.12657135 |
| 7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
1493 |
14.3% |
0.14326840 |
| 8 |
>1 000 000 |
745 |
7.1% |
0.07149026 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
278 |
2.7% |
0.02667690 |
r20pk1
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
1563 |
15.0% |
0.149985606 |
| 2 |
Interested |
4655 |
44.7% |
0.446694175 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
3242 |
31.1% |
0.311102581 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
740 |
7.1% |
0.071010460 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
126 |
1.2% |
0.012090970 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
95 |
0.9% |
0.009116208 |
r20och4_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly choose if respondent is asked r20och5a, r20och5b,
and r20och5c, or r20och6a, r20och6b, and r20och6c]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 2,3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3365] [Invalid:7056]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
r20och5a, r20och5b, and r20och5c |
1614 |
48.0% |
0.4796434 |
| 2 |
r20och6a, r20och6b, and r20och6c |
1751 |
52.0% |
0.5203566 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7056 |
|
NA |
r20och4a_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r20och5]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 2,3 and r20och4_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1614] [Invalid:8807]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Norwegian Labour Party wins the election, and their leader becomes Prime
Minister in a red-green majority government consisting of the Norwegian Labour
Party, the Centre Party and the Socialist Left Party |
828 |
51.3% |
0.5130112 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway wins the election, and their leader becomes
Prime Minister in a conservative majority government consisting of the
Conservative Party of Norway, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party of Norway |
786 |
48.7% |
0.4869888 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och4a_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r20och5]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 2,3 and r20och4_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1614] [Invalid:8807]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the Labour-led |
828 |
51.3% |
0.5130112 |
| 2 |
Conservative-led |
786 |
48.7% |
0.4869888 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och4b_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r20och6]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 2,3 and r20och4_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1751] [Invalid:8670]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Progress Party does very well in the election and becomes responsible for
immigration in a majority government consisting of the Conservative Party of
Norway and the Progress Party |
892 |
50.9% |
0.5094232 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party does very well in the election and becomes responsible
for immigration in a majority government consisting of the Norwegian Labour
Party and the Socialist Left Party |
859 |
49.1% |
0.4905768 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och4b_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r20och6]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 2,3 and r20och4_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1751] [Invalid:8670]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
blue |
892 |
50.9% |
0.5094232 |
| 2 |
red |
859 |
49.1% |
0.4905768 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare
funding: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment
rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2]
government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to
unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive
kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the
face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to
take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
365 |
22.6% |
0.22614622 |
| 1 |
1 |
66 |
4.1% |
0.04089219 |
| 2 |
2 |
96 |
5.9% |
0.05947955 |
| 3 |
3 |
111 |
6.9% |
0.06877323 |
| 4 |
4 |
101 |
6.3% |
0.06257745 |
| 5 |
5 |
165 |
10.2% |
0.10223048 |
| 6 |
6 |
131 |
8.1% |
0.08116481 |
| 7 |
7 |
121 |
7.5% |
0.07496902 |
| 8 |
8 |
122 |
7.6% |
0.07558860 |
| 9 |
9 |
92 |
5.7% |
0.05700124 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
98 |
6.1% |
0.06071871 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
146 |
9.0% |
0.09045849 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare
funding: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment
rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2]
government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to
unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive
kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the
face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to
take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
886 |
54.9% |
0.54894672 |
| 1 |
1 |
75 |
4.6% |
0.04646840 |
| 2 |
2 |
70 |
4.3% |
0.04337051 |
| 3 |
3 |
69 |
4.3% |
0.04275093 |
| 4 |
4 |
53 |
3.3% |
0.03283767 |
| 5 |
5 |
74 |
4.6% |
0.04584882 |
| 6 |
6 |
57 |
3.5% |
0.03531599 |
| 7 |
7 |
54 |
3.3% |
0.03345725 |
| 8 |
8 |
47 |
2.9% |
0.02912020 |
| 9 |
9 |
26 |
1.6% |
0.01610905 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
36 |
2.2% |
0.02230483 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
167 |
10.3% |
0.10346964 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare
funding: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment
rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2]
government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to
unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive
kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the
face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to
take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
493 |
30.5% |
0.30545229 |
| 1 |
1 |
79 |
4.9% |
0.04894672 |
| 2 |
2 |
102 |
6.3% |
0.06319703 |
| 3 |
3 |
96 |
5.9% |
0.05947955 |
| 4 |
4 |
92 |
5.7% |
0.05700124 |
| 5 |
5 |
133 |
8.2% |
0.08240397 |
| 6 |
6 |
84 |
5.2% |
0.05204461 |
| 7 |
7 |
112 |
6.9% |
0.06939281 |
| 8 |
8 |
108 |
6.7% |
0.06691450 |
| 9 |
9 |
72 |
4.5% |
0.04460967 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
103 |
6.4% |
0.06381660 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
140 |
8.7% |
0.08674102 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare
funding: The Christian Democrats
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment
rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2]
government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to
unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive
kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the
face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to
take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
856 |
53.0% |
0.530359356 |
| 1 |
1 |
112 |
6.9% |
0.069392813 |
| 2 |
2 |
109 |
6.8% |
0.067534077 |
| 3 |
3 |
93 |
5.8% |
0.057620818 |
| 4 |
4 |
57 |
3.5% |
0.035315985 |
| 5 |
5 |
93 |
5.8% |
0.057620818 |
| 6 |
6 |
37 |
2.3% |
0.022924411 |
| 7 |
7 |
28 |
1.7% |
0.017348203 |
| 8 |
8 |
14 |
0.9% |
0.008674102 |
| 9 |
9 |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009293680 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
25 |
1.5% |
0.015489467 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
175 |
10.8% |
0.108426270 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_5
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare
funding: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment
rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2]
government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to
unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive
kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the
face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to
take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
776 |
48.1% |
0.48079306 |
| 1 |
1 |
85 |
5.3% |
0.05266419 |
| 2 |
2 |
95 |
5.9% |
0.05885998 |
| 3 |
3 |
87 |
5.4% |
0.05390335 |
| 4 |
4 |
66 |
4.1% |
0.04089219 |
| 5 |
5 |
106 |
6.6% |
0.06567534 |
| 6 |
6 |
61 |
3.8% |
0.03779430 |
| 7 |
7 |
56 |
3.5% |
0.03469641 |
| 8 |
8 |
43 |
2.7% |
0.02664188 |
| 9 |
9 |
25 |
1.5% |
0.01548947 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
30 |
1.9% |
0.01858736 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
184 |
11.4% |
0.11400248 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_6
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare
funding: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment
rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2]
government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to
unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive
kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the
face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to
take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
813 |
50.4% |
0.50371747 |
| 1 |
1 |
95 |
5.9% |
0.05885998 |
| 2 |
2 |
82 |
5.1% |
0.05080545 |
| 3 |
3 |
72 |
4.5% |
0.04460967 |
| 4 |
4 |
40 |
2.5% |
0.02478315 |
| 5 |
5 |
86 |
5.3% |
0.05328377 |
| 6 |
6 |
61 |
3.8% |
0.03779430 |
| 7 |
7 |
58 |
3.6% |
0.03593556 |
| 8 |
8 |
49 |
3.0% |
0.03035936 |
| 9 |
9 |
36 |
2.2% |
0.02230483 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
51 |
3.2% |
0.03159851 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
171 |
10.6% |
0.10594796 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_7
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare
funding: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment
rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2]
government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to
unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive
kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the
face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to
take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
471 |
29.2% |
0.29182156 |
| 1 |
1 |
82 |
5.1% |
0.05080545 |
| 2 |
2 |
110 |
6.8% |
0.06815366 |
| 3 |
3 |
106 |
6.6% |
0.06567534 |
| 4 |
4 |
126 |
7.8% |
0.07806691 |
| 5 |
5 |
153 |
9.5% |
0.09479554 |
| 6 |
6 |
99 |
6.1% |
0.06133829 |
| 7 |
7 |
93 |
5.8% |
0.05762082 |
| 8 |
8 |
84 |
5.2% |
0.05204461 |
| 9 |
9 |
45 |
2.8% |
0.02788104 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
77 |
4.8% |
0.04770756 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
168 |
10.4% |
0.10408922 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_8
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare
funding: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment
rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2]
government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to
unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive
kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the
face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to
take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
617 |
38.2% |
0.38228005 |
| 1 |
1 |
99 |
6.1% |
0.06133829 |
| 2 |
2 |
87 |
5.4% |
0.05390335 |
| 3 |
3 |
92 |
5.7% |
0.05700124 |
| 4 |
4 |
74 |
4.6% |
0.04584882 |
| 5 |
5 |
121 |
7.5% |
0.07496902 |
| 6 |
6 |
64 |
4.0% |
0.03965304 |
| 7 |
7 |
75 |
4.6% |
0.04646840 |
| 8 |
8 |
99 |
6.1% |
0.06133829 |
| 9 |
9 |
59 |
3.7% |
0.03655514 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
54 |
3.3% |
0.03345725 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
173 |
10.7% |
0.10718711 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_9
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare
funding: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment
rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2]
government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to
unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive
kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the
face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to
take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
684 |
42.4% |
0.423791822 |
| 1 |
1 |
110 |
6.8% |
0.068153656 |
| 2 |
2 |
139 |
8.6% |
0.086121437 |
| 3 |
3 |
129 |
8.0% |
0.079925651 |
| 4 |
4 |
104 |
6.4% |
0.064436183 |
| 5 |
5 |
112 |
6.9% |
0.069392813 |
| 6 |
6 |
52 |
3.2% |
0.032218092 |
| 7 |
7 |
48 |
3.0% |
0.029739777 |
| 8 |
8 |
30 |
1.9% |
0.018587361 |
| 9 |
9 |
18 |
1.1% |
0.011152416 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007434944 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
176 |
10.9% |
0.109045849 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_10
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare
funding: Other parties/lists
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment
rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2]
government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to
unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive
kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the
face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to
take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other parties or lists
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
1039 |
64.4% |
0.643742255 |
| 1 |
1 |
53 |
3.3% |
0.032837670 |
| 2 |
2 |
45 |
2.8% |
0.027881041 |
| 3 |
3 |
34 |
2.1% |
0.021065675 |
| 4 |
4 |
21 |
1.3% |
0.013011152 |
| 5 |
5 |
73 |
4.5% |
0.045229244 |
| 6 |
6 |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006195787 |
| 7 |
7 |
11 |
0.7% |
0.006815366 |
| 8 |
8 |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004337051 |
| 9 |
9 |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007434944 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
19 |
1.2% |
0.011771995 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
290 |
18.0% |
0.179677819 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_11
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare
funding: blank/not voted
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment
rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2]
government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to
unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive
kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the
face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to
take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Blank/Not voted
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
1046 |
64.8% |
0.648079306 |
| 1 |
1 |
34 |
2.1% |
0.021065675 |
| 2 |
2 |
17 |
1.1% |
0.010532838 |
| 3 |
3 |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009293680 |
| 4 |
4 |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009293680 |
| 5 |
5 |
55 |
3.4% |
0.034076828 |
| 6 |
6 |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004956629 |
| 7 |
7 |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007434944 |
| 8 |
8 |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006195787 |
| 9 |
9 |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004956629 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
31 |
1.9% |
0.019206939 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
363 |
22.5% |
0.224907063 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5b
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the way democracy works, if the government cuts
welfare funding?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the
face of the economic crisis.
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means extremely dissatisfied and 10 means
extremely satisfied, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works
in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Extremely dissatisfied |
62 |
3.8% |
0.03841388 |
| 1 |
1 |
45 |
2.8% |
0.02788104 |
| 2 |
2 |
92 |
5.7% |
0.05700124 |
| 3 |
3 |
93 |
5.8% |
0.05762082 |
| 4 |
4 |
107 |
6.6% |
0.06629492 |
| 5 |
5 |
233 |
14.4% |
0.14436183 |
| 6 |
6 |
210 |
13.0% |
0.13011152 |
| 7 |
7 |
313 |
19.4% |
0.19392813 |
| 8 |
8 |
314 |
19.5% |
0.19454771 |
| 9 |
9 |
75 |
4.6% |
0.04646840 |
| 10 |
10 - Extremely satisfied |
24 |
1.5% |
0.01486989 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
2.9% |
0.02850062 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5c
|
Variable label:
|
Can you remember which party the Prime Minister represented in the short
text you just read?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you, without checking, remember which party the Prime Minister
represented in the short text you just read?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
638 |
39.5% |
0.3952912020 |
| 2 |
The Progress Party |
11 |
0.7% |
0.0068153656 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party |
785 |
48.6% |
0.4863692689 |
| 4 |
The Christian Democrats |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006195787 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0012391574 |
| 6 |
The Red Party |
3 |
0.2% |
0.0018587361 |
| 7 |
The Centre Party |
4 |
0.2% |
0.0024783147 |
| 8 |
The Socialist Left Party |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0012391574 |
| 9 |
The Liberal Party |
3 |
0.2% |
0.0018587361 |
| 10 |
Other parties or lists |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000000 |
| 11 |
Do not remember |
141 |
8.7% |
0.0873605948 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.5% |
0.0148698885 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5c_check
|
Variable label:
|
[Marks if the respondent navigates backwards in questionnaire after seen
r20och5c]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Registers if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:112] [Invalid:10309]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has navigated backwards |
112 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10309 |
|
NA |
r20och5c_seen
|
Variable label:
|
[Marks if the respondent has seen question r20och5c]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Registers if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1 & r20och4_ran =
2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1610] [Invalid:8811]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1610 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8811 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens
immigration policy: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway
experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government
chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum
seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in
the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is
to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
395 |
22.6% |
0.22558538 |
| 1 |
1 |
55 |
3.1% |
0.03141062 |
| 2 |
2 |
115 |
6.6% |
0.06567676 |
| 3 |
3 |
110 |
6.3% |
0.06282125 |
| 4 |
4 |
123 |
7.0% |
0.07024557 |
| 5 |
5 |
199 |
11.4% |
0.11364934 |
| 6 |
6 |
108 |
6.2% |
0.06167904 |
| 7 |
7 |
136 |
7.8% |
0.07766990 |
| 8 |
8 |
127 |
7.3% |
0.07252998 |
| 9 |
9 |
67 |
3.8% |
0.03826385 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
97 |
5.5% |
0.05539692 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
219 |
12.5% |
0.12507139 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens
immigration policy: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway
experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government
chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum
seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in
the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is
to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
925 |
52.8% |
0.52826956 |
| 1 |
1 |
63 |
3.6% |
0.03597944 |
| 2 |
2 |
72 |
4.1% |
0.04111936 |
| 3 |
3 |
65 |
3.7% |
0.03712164 |
| 4 |
4 |
52 |
3.0% |
0.02969732 |
| 5 |
5 |
75 |
4.3% |
0.04283267 |
| 6 |
6 |
40 |
2.3% |
0.02284409 |
| 7 |
7 |
45 |
2.6% |
0.02569960 |
| 8 |
8 |
57 |
3.3% |
0.03255283 |
| 9 |
9 |
45 |
2.6% |
0.02569960 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
64 |
3.7% |
0.03655054 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
248 |
14.2% |
0.14163335 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens
immigration policy: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway
experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government
chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum
seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in
the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is
to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
462 |
26.4% |
0.26384923 |
| 1 |
1 |
75 |
4.3% |
0.04283267 |
| 2 |
2 |
96 |
5.5% |
0.05482581 |
| 3 |
3 |
95 |
5.4% |
0.05425471 |
| 4 |
4 |
94 |
5.4% |
0.05368361 |
| 5 |
5 |
148 |
8.5% |
0.08452313 |
| 6 |
6 |
106 |
6.1% |
0.06053684 |
| 7 |
7 |
130 |
7.4% |
0.07424329 |
| 8 |
8 |
108 |
6.2% |
0.06167904 |
| 9 |
9 |
102 |
5.8% |
0.05825243 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
121 |
6.9% |
0.06910337 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
214 |
12.2% |
0.12221588 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens
immigration policy: The Christian Democrats
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway
experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government
chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum
seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in
the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is
to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… The Christian Democrats
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
891 |
50.9% |
0.508852085 |
| 1 |
1 |
109 |
6.2% |
0.062250143 |
| 2 |
2 |
122 |
7.0% |
0.069674472 |
| 3 |
3 |
92 |
5.3% |
0.052541405 |
| 4 |
4 |
53 |
3.0% |
0.030268418 |
| 5 |
5 |
88 |
5.0% |
0.050256996 |
| 6 |
6 |
38 |
2.2% |
0.021701885 |
| 7 |
7 |
34 |
1.9% |
0.019417476 |
| 8 |
8 |
26 |
1.5% |
0.014848658 |
| 9 |
9 |
12 |
0.7% |
0.006853227 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
29 |
1.7% |
0.016561965 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
257 |
14.7% |
0.146773272 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_5
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens
immigration policy: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway
experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government
chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum
seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in
the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is
to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
781 |
44.6% |
0.44603084 |
| 1 |
1 |
81 |
4.6% |
0.04625928 |
| 2 |
2 |
100 |
5.7% |
0.05711022 |
| 3 |
3 |
87 |
5.0% |
0.04968589 |
| 4 |
4 |
76 |
4.3% |
0.04340377 |
| 5 |
5 |
125 |
7.1% |
0.07138778 |
| 6 |
6 |
56 |
3.2% |
0.03198172 |
| 7 |
7 |
58 |
3.3% |
0.03312393 |
| 8 |
8 |
59 |
3.4% |
0.03369503 |
| 9 |
9 |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01599086 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
32 |
1.8% |
0.01827527 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
268 |
15.3% |
0.15305540 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_6
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens
immigration policy: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway
experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government
chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum
seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in
the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is
to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
867 |
49.5% |
0.49514563 |
| 1 |
1 |
76 |
4.3% |
0.04340377 |
| 2 |
2 |
94 |
5.4% |
0.05368361 |
| 3 |
3 |
80 |
4.6% |
0.04568818 |
| 4 |
4 |
64 |
3.7% |
0.03655054 |
| 5 |
5 |
85 |
4.9% |
0.04854369 |
| 6 |
6 |
42 |
2.4% |
0.02398629 |
| 7 |
7 |
47 |
2.7% |
0.02684180 |
| 8 |
8 |
53 |
3.0% |
0.03026842 |
| 9 |
9 |
34 |
1.9% |
0.01941748 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
49 |
2.8% |
0.02798401 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
260 |
14.8% |
0.14848658 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_7
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens
immigration policy: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway
experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government
chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum
seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in
the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is
to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
502 |
28.7% |
0.28669332 |
| 1 |
1 |
82 |
4.7% |
0.04683038 |
| 2 |
2 |
120 |
6.9% |
0.06853227 |
| 3 |
3 |
115 |
6.6% |
0.06567676 |
| 4 |
4 |
110 |
6.3% |
0.06282125 |
| 5 |
5 |
164 |
9.4% |
0.09366077 |
| 6 |
6 |
110 |
6.3% |
0.06282125 |
| 7 |
7 |
86 |
4.9% |
0.04911479 |
| 8 |
8 |
84 |
4.8% |
0.04797259 |
| 9 |
9 |
58 |
3.3% |
0.03312393 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
71 |
4.1% |
0.04054826 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
249 |
14.2% |
0.14220445 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_8
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens
immigration policy: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway
experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government
chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum
seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in
the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is
to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
670 |
38.3% |
0.38263849 |
| 1 |
1 |
94 |
5.4% |
0.05368361 |
| 2 |
2 |
98 |
5.6% |
0.05596802 |
| 3 |
3 |
82 |
4.7% |
0.04683038 |
| 4 |
4 |
75 |
4.3% |
0.04283267 |
| 5 |
5 |
103 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
| 6 |
6 |
72 |
4.1% |
0.04111936 |
| 7 |
7 |
84 |
4.8% |
0.04797259 |
| 8 |
8 |
88 |
5.0% |
0.05025700 |
| 9 |
9 |
70 |
4.0% |
0.03997716 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
69 |
3.9% |
0.03940605 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
246 |
14.0% |
0.14049115 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_9
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens
immigration policy: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway
experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government
chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum
seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in
the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is
to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
698 |
39.9% |
0.398629355 |
| 1 |
1 |
89 |
5.1% |
0.050828098 |
| 2 |
2 |
162 |
9.3% |
0.092518561 |
| 3 |
3 |
127 |
7.3% |
0.072529983 |
| 4 |
4 |
101 |
5.8% |
0.057681325 |
| 5 |
5 |
123 |
7.0% |
0.070245574 |
| 6 |
6 |
67 |
3.8% |
0.038263849 |
| 7 |
7 |
41 |
2.3% |
0.023415191 |
| 8 |
8 |
34 |
1.9% |
0.019417476 |
| 9 |
9 |
17 |
1.0% |
0.009708738 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
20 |
1.1% |
0.011422045 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
272 |
15.5% |
0.155339806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_10
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens
immigration policy: Other parties/lists
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway
experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government
chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum
seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in
the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is
to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… Other parties or lists
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
1079 |
61.6% |
0.616219303 |
| 1 |
1 |
53 |
3.0% |
0.030268418 |
| 2 |
2 |
50 |
2.9% |
0.028555111 |
| 3 |
3 |
33 |
1.9% |
0.018846374 |
| 4 |
4 |
22 |
1.3% |
0.012564249 |
| 5 |
5 |
78 |
4.5% |
0.044545974 |
| 6 |
6 |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006282125 |
| 7 |
7 |
13 |
0.7% |
0.007424329 |
| 8 |
8 |
17 |
1.0% |
0.009708738 |
| 9 |
9 |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005139920 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
20 |
1.1% |
0.011422045 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
366 |
20.9% |
0.209023415 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_11
|
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens
immigration policy: Blank/Not voted
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a
general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway
experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government
chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum
seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in
the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is
to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means
definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… Blank/Not voted
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Definitely not |
1089 |
62.2% |
0.621930326 |
| 1 |
1 |
40 |
2.3% |
0.022844089 |
| 2 |
2 |
18 |
1.0% |
0.010279840 |
| 3 |
3 |
23 |
1.3% |
0.013135351 |
| 4 |
4 |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004568818 |
| 5 |
5 |
74 |
4.2% |
0.042261565 |
| 6 |
6 |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005139920 |
| 7 |
7 |
18 |
1.0% |
0.010279840 |
| 8 |
8 |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006282125 |
| 9 |
9 |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007995431 |
| 10 |
10 - Definitely |
24 |
1.4% |
0.013706453 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
423 |
24.2% |
0.241576242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6b
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the way democracy works, if the government softens
immigration policy?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think again about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy
in the face of the refugee crisis.
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means extremely dissatisfied and 10 means
extremely satisfied, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works
in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Extremely dissatisfied |
34 |
1.9% |
0.01941748 |
| 1 |
1 |
38 |
2.2% |
0.02170188 |
| 2 |
2 |
61 |
3.5% |
0.03483724 |
| 3 |
3 |
83 |
4.7% |
0.04740148 |
| 4 |
4 |
72 |
4.1% |
0.04111936 |
| 5 |
5 |
192 |
11.0% |
0.10965163 |
| 6 |
6 |
217 |
12.4% |
0.12392918 |
| 7 |
7 |
362 |
20.7% |
0.20673901 |
| 8 |
8 |
444 |
25.4% |
0.25356939 |
| 9 |
9 |
148 |
8.5% |
0.08452313 |
| 10 |
10 - Extremely satisfied |
46 |
2.6% |
0.02627070 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
3.1% |
0.03083952 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6c
|
Variable label:
|
Can you remember which party was responsible for immigration in the
short text you just read?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you, without checking, remember which party was responsible for
immigration in the short text you just read?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
56 |
3.2% |
0.0319817247 |
| 2 |
The Progress Party |
621 |
35.5% |
0.3546544832 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party |
161 |
9.2% |
0.0919474586 |
| 4 |
The Christian Democrats |
44 |
2.5% |
0.0251284980 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0011422045 |
| 6 |
The Red Party |
15 |
0.9% |
0.0085665334 |
| 7 |
The Centre Party |
16 |
0.9% |
0.0091376356 |
| 8 |
The Socialist Left Party |
635 |
36.3% |
0.3626499143 |
| 9 |
The Liberal Party |
16 |
0.9% |
0.0091376356 |
| 10 |
Other parties or lists |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005711022 |
| 11 |
Do not remember |
151 |
8.6% |
0.0862364363 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.9% |
0.0188463735 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6c_check
|
Variable label:
|
[Marks if the respondent navigates backwards in questionnaire after seen
r20och6c]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Registers if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:94] [Invalid:10327]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has navigated backwards |
94 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10327 |
|
NA |
r20och6c_seen
|
Variable label:
|
[Marks if the respondent has seen question r20och6c]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Registers if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1746] [Invalid:8675]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1746 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8675 |
|
NA |
r20avslutt
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Feedback about the survey
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10421]
[Range:-]
|
r20P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
5276 |
50.6% |
0.5062854 |
| 2 |
Female |
5145 |
49.4% |
0.4937146 |
r20P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
1664 |
16.0% |
0.15967757 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
3769 |
36.2% |
0.36167354 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
505 |
4.8% |
0.04845984 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
2830 |
27.2% |
0.27156703 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
851 |
8.2% |
0.08166203 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
802 |
7.7% |
0.07695998 |
r20P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:3-54]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
1664 |
16.0% |
0.15967757 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
969 |
9.3% |
0.09298532 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
423 |
4.1% |
0.04059111 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
393 |
3.8% |
0.03771231 |
| 30 |
Viken |
2449 |
23.5% |
0.23500624 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
575 |
5.5% |
0.05517705 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
745 |
7.1% |
0.07149026 |
| 42 |
Agder |
505 |
4.8% |
0.04845984 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
1438 |
13.8% |
0.13799060 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
851 |
8.2% |
0.08166203 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
409 |
3.9% |
0.03924767 |
r20P3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Constituencies parliament election 2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Østfold |
503 |
4.8% |
0.048267921 |
| 1 |
Akershus |
1457 |
14.0% |
0.139813837 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
1664 |
16.0% |
0.159677574 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
314 |
3.0% |
0.030131465 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
261 |
2.5% |
0.025045581 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
489 |
4.7% |
0.046924479 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
486 |
4.7% |
0.046636599 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
259 |
2.5% |
0.024853661 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
186 |
1.8% |
0.017848575 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
319 |
3.1% |
0.030611266 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
969 |
9.3% |
0.092985318 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
1268 |
12.2% |
0.121677382 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
170 |
1.6% |
0.016313214 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
423 |
4.1% |
0.040591114 |
| 16 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
675 |
6.5% |
0.064773054 |
| 15 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
176 |
1.7% |
0.016888974 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
393 |
3.8% |
0.037712312 |
| 18 |
Troms |
309 |
3.0% |
0.029651665 |
| 19 |
Finnmark |
100 |
1.0% |
0.009596008 |
r20P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
487 |
4.7% |
0.04673256 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
3100 |
29.7% |
0.29747625 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
6701 |
64.3% |
0.64302850 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
133 |
1.3% |
0.01276269 |
r20P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
21 |
0.2% |
0.0020151617 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
466 |
4.5% |
0.0447173976 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
903 |
8.7% |
0.0866519528 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1218 |
11.7% |
0.1168793782 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
979 |
9.4% |
0.0939449189 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
875 |
8.4% |
0.0839650705 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2209 |
21.2% |
0.2119758181 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
768 |
7.4% |
0.0736973419 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
756 |
7.3% |
0.0725458209 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1808 |
17.3% |
0.1734958257 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
285 |
2.7% |
0.0273486230 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
126 |
1.2% |
0.0120909702 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.0006717206 |
r20P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
276 |
2.6% |
0.02648498 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
1813 |
17.4% |
0.17397563 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
2635 |
25.3% |
0.25285481 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
2345 |
22.5% |
0.22502639 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
1606 |
15.4% |
0.15411189 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
1023 |
9.8% |
0.09816716 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
723 |
6.9% |
0.06937914 |
r20P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
4724 |
45.3% |
0.45331542 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
4974 |
47.7% |
0.47730544 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
723 |
6.9% |
0.06937914 |
r20Weight1_stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, and P5_2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation
report.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-0]
|
r20Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, and P5_2. See documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-8]
|
r20Weight2_stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, P4_1, and P5_2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation
report.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10288] [Invalid:133]
[Range:0-0]
|
r20Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1, and P5_2. See documentation
report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-55]
|
r20Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-5]
|
