Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Lund Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Dag Elgesem
|
UiB
|
|
Arjan Schakel
|
UiB
|
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
|
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø
|
NORCE
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
Coordinating team
|
Name
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
|
Hanna Fylkesnes
|
|
Hans Martin Lundgaard Corneliussen
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Universe: Norwegian Citizens above
the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in eight
waves:
In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 1).
In wave 3, 5 623 members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 3).
In wave 8, 4 245 new
members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8).
In wave
11, 2 069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave
11).
In wave 14, 2 036 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 14).
In wave 16, 5 163 panel members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 16).
In wave 18, 2 048
panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 18).
In
wave 22, 3 221 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave
22).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry, while in wave 8 the
gross sample amounted to 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, 14, and 18, a
corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. In wave 16, the
gross sample was 34 000. In wave 22 the gross sample was 23 000.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d)
gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from
previous waves:
https://nsd.no/nsddata/serier/norsk_medborgerpanel_eng.html
In wave 24, emails were sent out on 23rd and 24th of May, 2022.
An e-mail with reminder was sent out three times; May 31st, June 7th,
and June 10th, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to
the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with
registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message.
Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by e-mail.
Wave 24 ended on the 15th of June 2022.
Weighting
To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated.
The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population
and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata
in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns
values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will
receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a
weight below 1. The weights of the different strata are listed in the
documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information
regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are
based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample
file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information
regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when
answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weights are calculated
using the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized)
sub-groups, which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group
compared to the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, variable
columns are included in the dataset that indicates the proportion size
of strata in the population.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 24
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r24Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r24Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r24Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2023-10-25
|
r24Weight4
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-102
|
2023-10-25
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 24
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r24_Weight1
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r24_Weight2
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r24_Weight1_stratapop
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r24_Weight2_stratapop
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r24P5_1
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r24P5_2
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-09-01
|
r24_P2
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
v-101
|
2022-09-05
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 24
|
|
v-100
|
2022-07-01
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 24
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 24 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
10160
|
|
# Variables
|
417
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r24_rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
The wave the respondent was recruited
|
|
Technical description:
|
The wave the respondent was recruited
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-22]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
1322 |
13.0% |
0.13011811 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
1384 |
13.6% |
0.13622047 |
| 8 |
Wave 8 |
1353 |
13.3% |
0.13316929 |
| 11 |
Wave 11 |
731 |
7.2% |
0.07194882 |
| 14 |
Wave 14 |
746 |
7.3% |
0.07342520 |
| 16 |
Wave 16 |
2067 |
20.3% |
0.20344488 |
| 18 |
Wave 18 |
860 |
8.5% |
0.08464567 |
| 22 |
Wave 22 |
1697 |
16.7% |
0.16702756 |
r24_group
|
Variable label:
|
Subgroup in wave 24. Assigned at random.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 |
2001 |
19.7% |
0.1969488 |
| 2 |
Group 2 |
2046 |
20.1% |
0.2013780 |
| 3 |
Group 3 |
1970 |
19.4% |
0.1938976 |
| 4 |
Group 4 |
2081 |
20.5% |
0.2048228 |
| 5 |
Group 5 |
2062 |
20.3% |
0.2029528 |
r24_interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r24_interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9420] [Invalid:740]
[Range:-]
|
r24_browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Technical description:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r24_browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Technical description:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r24_mobil
|
Variable label:
|
Determines if the respondents uses mobile
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determines if the respondents uses mobile
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
5392 |
53.1% |
0.5307087 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
4768 |
46.9% |
0.4692913 |
r24_opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Technical description:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r24_enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
Determines respondents device type
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determines respondents device type
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
5392 |
53.1% |
0.530708661 |
| 2 |
Touch |
4720 |
46.5% |
0.464566929 |
| 3 |
Generic |
48 |
0.5% |
0.004724409 |
r24_advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r24_getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Technical description:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r24_panel
|
Variable label:
|
Panel subgroup in wave 24. Respondents who have previously been exposed
to questions regarding corona was assigned to group 1. The remaining
respondents were randomly allocated to group 2 and group 3.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Panel group 1 |
1752 |
17.2% |
0.1724409 |
| 2 |
Panel group 2 |
4185 |
41.2% |
0.4119094 |
| 3 |
Panel group 3 |
4223 |
41.6% |
0.4156496 |
r24_pcpar
|
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
294 |
2.9% |
0.02893701 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2516 |
24.8% |
0.24763780 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
807 |
7.9% |
0.07942913 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
452 |
4.4% |
0.04448819 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1110 |
10.9% |
0.10925197 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
521 |
5.1% |
0.05127953 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
503 |
5.0% |
0.04950787 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2143 |
21.1% |
0.21092520 |
| 9 |
Red |
657 |
6.5% |
0.06466535 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
221 |
2.2% |
0.02175197 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
367 |
3.6% |
0.03612205 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
207 |
2.0% |
0.02037402 |
| 13 |
Other: |
339 |
3.3% |
0.03336614 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.2% |
0.00226378 |
r24_pcpar_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary
election tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10160] [Range:-]
|
r24_pcpak
|
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if there was a municipal election
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there was a municipal election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
62 |
3.1% |
0.0309845077 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
483 |
24.1% |
0.2413793103 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
134 |
6.7% |
0.0669665167 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
81 |
4.0% |
0.0404797601 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
214 |
10.7% |
0.1069465267 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
125 |
6.2% |
0.0624687656 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
109 |
5.4% |
0.0544727636 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
436 |
21.8% |
0.2178910545 |
| 9 |
Red |
122 |
6.1% |
0.0609695152 |
| 10 |
The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
12 |
0.6% |
0.0059970015 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0004997501 |
| 12 |
A local list |
52 |
2.6% |
0.0259870065 |
| 13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
57 |
2.8% |
0.0284857571 |
| 14 |
Would not vote |
42 |
2.1% |
0.0209895052 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
5 |
0.2% |
0.0024987506 |
| 16 |
Other: |
60 |
3.0% |
0.0299850075 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.0029985007 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcpak_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary
election tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10160] [Range:-]
|
r24_pcpaf
|
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
60 |
3.0% |
0.0299850075 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
451 |
22.5% |
0.2253873063 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
154 |
7.7% |
0.0769615192 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
72 |
3.6% |
0.0359820090 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
216 |
10.8% |
0.1079460270 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
113 |
5.6% |
0.0564717641 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
109 |
5.4% |
0.0544727636 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
403 |
20.1% |
0.2013993003 |
| 9 |
Red |
128 |
6.4% |
0.0639680160 |
| 10 |
The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
14 |
0.7% |
0.0069965017 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009995002 |
| 12 |
A local list |
17 |
0.8% |
0.0084957521 |
| 13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
83 |
4.1% |
0.0414792604 |
| 14 |
Would not vote |
100 |
5.0% |
0.0499750125 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
18 |
0.9% |
0.0089955022 |
| 16 |
Other: |
52 |
2.6% |
0.0259870065 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.4% |
0.0044977511 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcpaf_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which party would you vote for if there was a county election
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10160] [Range:-]
|
r24_pcmip_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (1)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
1:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10160] [Range:-]
|
r24_pcmip_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (2)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
2:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10160] [Range:-]
|
r24_pcmip_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (3)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
3:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10160] [Range:-]
|
r24_pcldk
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
339 |
16.9% |
0.169415292 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
456 |
22.8% |
0.227886057 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
467 |
23.3% |
0.233383308 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
409 |
20.4% |
0.204397801 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
226 |
11.3% |
0.112943528 |
| 6 |
Really like |
67 |
3.3% |
0.033483258 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
16 |
0.8% |
0.007996002 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.0% |
0.010494753 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcldh
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
101 |
5.0% |
0.050474763 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
281 |
14.0% |
0.140429785 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
372 |
18.6% |
0.185907046 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
253 |
12.6% |
0.126436782 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
423 |
21.1% |
0.211394303 |
| 6 |
Really like |
417 |
20.8% |
0.208395802 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
135 |
6.7% |
0.067466267 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009495252 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcldf
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
645 |
32.2% |
0.322338831 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
378 |
18.9% |
0.188905547 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
299 |
14.9% |
0.149425287 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
182 |
9.1% |
0.090954523 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
263 |
13.1% |
0.131434283 |
| 6 |
Really like |
162 |
8.1% |
0.080959520 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
58 |
2.9% |
0.028985507 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.7% |
0.006996502 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcldv
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
180 |
9.0% |
0.08995502 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
296 |
14.8% |
0.14792604 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
453 |
22.6% |
0.22638681 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
508 |
25.4% |
0.25387306 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
384 |
19.2% |
0.19190405 |
| 6 |
Really like |
129 |
6.4% |
0.06446777 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
28 |
1.4% |
0.01399300 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcldsv
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Socialist Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
250 |
12.5% |
0.124937531 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
313 |
15.6% |
0.156421789 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
365 |
18.2% |
0.182408796 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
288 |
14.4% |
0.143928036 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
338 |
16.9% |
0.168915542 |
| 6 |
Really like |
320 |
16.0% |
0.159920040 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
109 |
5.4% |
0.054472764 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008995502 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcldsp
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
253 |
12.6% |
0.126436782 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
364 |
18.2% |
0.181909045 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
533 |
26.6% |
0.266366817 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
365 |
18.2% |
0.182408796 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
344 |
17.2% |
0.171914043 |
| 6 |
Really like |
107 |
5.3% |
0.053473263 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
14 |
0.7% |
0.006996502 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.0% |
0.010494753 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcldm
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
489 |
24.4% |
0.244377811 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
321 |
16.0% |
0.160419790 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
303 |
15.1% |
0.151424288 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
248 |
12.4% |
0.123938031 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
392 |
19.6% |
0.195902049 |
| 6 |
Really like |
174 |
8.7% |
0.086956522 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
57 |
2.8% |
0.028485757 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.8% |
0.008495752 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pclda
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
97 |
4.8% |
0.048475762 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
189 |
9.4% |
0.094452774 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
353 |
17.6% |
0.176411794 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
300 |
15.0% |
0.149925037 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
576 |
28.8% |
0.287856072 |
| 6 |
Really like |
380 |
19.0% |
0.189905047 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
88 |
4.4% |
0.043978011 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008995502 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcldr
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
483 |
24.1% |
0.241379310 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
332 |
16.6% |
0.165917041 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
283 |
14.1% |
0.141429285 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
243 |
12.1% |
0.121439280 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
358 |
17.9% |
0.178910545 |
| 6 |
Really like |
199 |
9.9% |
0.099450275 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
85 |
4.2% |
0.042478761 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008995502 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcsag
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with the government
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
34 |
1.7% |
0.0169915 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
418 |
20.9% |
0.2088956 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
731 |
36.5% |
0.3653173 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
555 |
27.7% |
0.2773613 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
259 |
12.9% |
0.1294353 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.0019990 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcecs
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of the current economic situation.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
393 |
19.6% |
0.196401799 |
| 2 |
Good |
843 |
42.1% |
0.421289355 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
351 |
17.5% |
0.175412294 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
157 |
7.8% |
0.078460770 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
152 |
7.6% |
0.075962019 |
| 6 |
Bad |
72 |
3.6% |
0.035982009 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
26 |
1.3% |
0.012993503 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003498251 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcecr
|
Variable label:
|
Economic situation [in r24_P2] compared with the rest of Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation [in r24_P2] with the rest of
Norway, do you consider the situation [in r24_P2] as being better, worse
or the same?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Better |
446 |
22.3% |
0.22288856 |
| 2 |
The same |
1088 |
54.4% |
0.54372814 |
| 3 |
Worse |
442 |
22.1% |
0.22088956 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.2% |
0.01249375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcrur
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for
non-urban/rural Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
281 |
14.0% |
0.14042979 |
| 2 |
Agree |
464 |
23.2% |
0.23188406 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
565 |
28.2% |
0.28235882 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
321 |
16.0% |
0.16041979 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
171 |
8.5% |
0.08545727 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
137 |
6.8% |
0.06846577 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
58 |
2.9% |
0.02898551 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.00199900 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_cpres
|
Variable label:
|
Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the
country to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same
quality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the
country to parts that are not so rich in order to ensure that everyone
receives public services of the same quality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
238 |
11.9% |
0.118940530 |
| 2 |
Agree |
701 |
35.0% |
0.350324838 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
652 |
32.6% |
0.325837081 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
218 |
10.9% |
0.108945527 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
110 |
5.5% |
0.054972514 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
54 |
2.7% |
0.026986507 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
20 |
1.0% |
0.009995002 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.4% |
0.003998001 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_cprtax_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in
[r24_cprtax].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2045] [Invalid:8115]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
people |
672 |
32.9% |
0.3286064 |
| 2 |
people in rural areas and people in the cities |
665 |
32.5% |
0.3251834 |
| 3 |
poor and rich |
708 |
34.6% |
0.3462103 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8115 |
|
NA |
r24_cprtax
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad: The state needs to do more to reduce economic differences
between [r24_cprtax_ran], even if it means increasing taxes slightly.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How good or bad do you think the following proposal is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The state needs to do more to reduce economic differences between
[r24_cprtax_ran], even if it means increasing taxes slightly.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
462 |
22.6% |
0.22580645 |
| 2 |
Good |
518 |
25.3% |
0.25317693 |
| 3 |
Fairly good |
417 |
20.4% |
0.20381232 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
273 |
13.3% |
0.13343109 |
| 5 |
Fairly bad |
174 |
8.5% |
0.08504399 |
| 6 |
Bad |
123 |
6.0% |
0.06011730 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
72 |
3.5% |
0.03519062 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.3% |
0.00342131 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_meira_1
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least like to read about: Climate change
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are a number of topics that Norwegian newspapers write about.
Please rank the topics according to which one you would like to know
more about. You should rank the topic that you would most like to read
about at the top and the one that you are least interested in reading at
the bottom. When you have finished, please click on Next.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Climate change
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the options in the order in which you would like to rank them.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The respondent was asked to rank the different alternatives.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Have ranked climate change as number 1 |
1072 |
54.4% |
0.54416244 |
| 2 |
Have ranked climate change as number 2 |
322 |
16.3% |
0.16345178 |
| 3 |
Have ranked climate change as number 3 |
205 |
10.4% |
0.10406091 |
| 4 |
Have ranked climate change as number 4 |
152 |
7.7% |
0.07715736 |
| 5 |
Have ranked climate change as number 5 |
134 |
6.8% |
0.06802030 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
85 |
4.3% |
0.04314721 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_meira_2
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least like to read about: Abortion legislation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are a number of topics that Norwegian newspapers write about.
Please rank the topics according to which one you would like to know
more about. You should rank the topic that you would most like to read
about at the top and the one that you are least interested in reading at
the bottom. When you have finished, please click on Next.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Abortion legislation
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the options in the order in which you would like to rank them.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The respondent was asked to rank the different alternatives.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Have ranked abortion legislation as number 1 |
173 |
8.8% |
0.08781726 |
| 2 |
Have ranked abortion legislation as number 2 |
344 |
17.5% |
0.17461929 |
| 3 |
Have ranked abortion legislation as number 3 |
412 |
20.9% |
0.20913706 |
| 4 |
Have ranked abortion legislation as number 4 |
373 |
18.9% |
0.18934010 |
| 5 |
Have ranked abortion legislation as number 5 |
457 |
23.2% |
0.23197970 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
211 |
10.7% |
0.10710660 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_meira_3
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least like to read about: Road tolls
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are a number of topics that Norwegian newspapers write about.
Please rank the topics according to which one you would like to know
more about. You should rank the topic that you would most like to read
about at the top and the one that you are least interested in reading at
the bottom. When you have finished, please click on Next.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the options in the order in which you would like to rank them.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The respondent was asked to rank the different alternatives.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Have ranked road tolls as number 1 |
209 |
10.6% |
0.10609137 |
| 2 |
Have ranked road tolls as number 2 |
263 |
13.4% |
0.13350254 |
| 3 |
Have ranked road tolls as number 3 |
269 |
13.7% |
0.13654822 |
| 4 |
Have ranked road tolls as number 4 |
381 |
19.3% |
0.19340102 |
| 5 |
Have ranked road tolls as number 5 |
669 |
34.0% |
0.33959391 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
179 |
9.1% |
0.09086294 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_meira_4
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least like to read about: Immigration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are a number of topics that Norwegian newspapers write about.
Please rank the topics according to which one you would like to know
more about. You should rank the topic that you would most like to read
about at the top and the one that you are least interested in reading at
the bottom. When you have finished, please click on Next.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigration
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the options in the order in which you would like to rank them.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The respondent was asked to rank the different alternatives.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Have ranked immigration as number 1 |
246 |
12.5% |
0.12487310 |
| 2 |
Have ranked immigration as number 2 |
585 |
29.7% |
0.29695431 |
| 3 |
Have ranked immigration as number 3 |
575 |
29.2% |
0.29187817 |
| 4 |
Have ranked immigration as number 4 |
318 |
16.1% |
0.16142132 |
| 5 |
Have ranked immigration as number 5 |
121 |
6.1% |
0.06142132 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
125 |
6.3% |
0.06345178 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_meira_5
|
Variable label:
|
Most/least like to read about: Merging municipalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are a number of topics that Norwegian newspapers write about.
Please rank the topics according to which one you would like to know
more about. You should rank the topic that you would most like to read
about at the top and the one that you are least interested in reading at
the bottom. When you have finished, please click on Next.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Merging municipalities
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the options in the order in which you would like to rank them.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The respondent was asked to rank the different alternatives.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Have ranked merging municipalities as number 1 |
231 |
11.7% |
0.1172589 |
| 2 |
Have ranked merging municipalities as number 2 |
376 |
19.1% |
0.1908629 |
| 3 |
Have ranked merging municipalities as number 3 |
383 |
19.4% |
0.1944162 |
| 4 |
Have ranked merging municipalities as number 4 |
487 |
24.7% |
0.2472081 |
| 5 |
Have ranked merging municipalities as number 5 |
324 |
16.4% |
0.1644670 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
169 |
8.6% |
0.0857868 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_faabe
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Self-determined abortion in Norway should be extended
from week 12 to week 22.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Self-determined abortion in Norway should be extended from week 12 to
week 22.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
424 |
21.5% |
0.215228426 |
| 2 |
Slightly disagree |
391 |
19.8% |
0.198477157 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
542 |
27.5% |
0.275126904 |
| 4 |
Slightly agree |
361 |
18.3% |
0.183248731 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
247 |
12.5% |
0.125380711 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002538071 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_faabe1
|
Variable label:
|
Inclined to agree/disagree: Self-determined abortion in Norway should be
extended from week 12 to week 22
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You replied that you neither agree nor disagree with the statement
“Self-determined abortion in Norway should be extended from week 12 to
week 22”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to make a choice, would you be slightly more inclined to
agree or disagree?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_faabe = 3 & r24_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Slightly more inclined to agree |
339 |
62.5% |
0.62546125 |
| 2 |
Slightly more inclined to disagree |
194 |
35.8% |
0.35793358 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.7% |
0.01660517 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9618 |
|
NA |
r24_cecho_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Our individual emissions have no impact on the climate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be various reasons for taking, or not taking, the climate into
account in the choices we make in our everyday lives. To what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Our individual emissions have no impact on the climate
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
76 |
3.9% |
0.038578680 |
| 2 |
Agree |
102 |
5.2% |
0.051776650 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
246 |
12.5% |
0.124873096 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
128 |
6.5% |
0.064974619 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
376 |
19.1% |
0.190862944 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
647 |
32.8% |
0.328426396 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
389 |
19.7% |
0.197461929 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003045685 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_cecho_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: We all have a moral duty to live in a more
climate-friendly manner
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be various reasons for taking, or not taking, the climate into
account in the choices we make in our everyday lives. To what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We all have a moral duty to live in a more climate-friendly manner
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
577 |
29.3% |
0.292893401 |
| 2 |
Agree |
845 |
42.9% |
0.428934010 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
321 |
16.3% |
0.162944162 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
110 |
5.6% |
0.055837563 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
39 |
2.0% |
0.019796954 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
34 |
1.7% |
0.017258883 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
38 |
1.9% |
0.019289340 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003045685 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_cecho_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: We would only adopt climate-friendly choices if they
were cheaper than the alternatives
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be various reasons for taking, or not taking, the climate into
account in the choices we make in our everyday lives. To what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would only adopt climate-friendly choices if they were cheaper than
the alternatives
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
143 |
7.3% |
0.072588832 |
| 2 |
Agree |
325 |
16.5% |
0.164974619 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
508 |
25.8% |
0.257868020 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
209 |
10.6% |
0.106091371 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
348 |
17.7% |
0.176649746 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
326 |
16.5% |
0.165482234 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
100 |
5.1% |
0.050761421 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.6% |
0.005583756 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_cecho_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: We can obtain more climate-friendly goods and services
by using our consumer power
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be various reasons for taking, or not taking, the climate into
account in the choices we make in our everyday lives. To what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We can obtain more climate-friendly goods and services by using our
consumer power
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
368 |
18.7% |
0.186802030 |
| 2 |
Agree |
787 |
39.9% |
0.399492386 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
496 |
25.2% |
0.251776650 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
171 |
8.7% |
0.086802030 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
69 |
3.5% |
0.035025381 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
45 |
2.3% |
0.022842640 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
26 |
1.3% |
0.013197970 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.4% |
0.004060914 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_cecho_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: If politicians see that many people are choosing to live
in a more climate-friendly way, they will place greater priority on the
climate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be various reasons for taking, or not taking, the climate into
account in the choices we make in our everyday lives. To what extent do
you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If politicians see that many people are choosing to live in a more
climate-friendly way, they will place greater priority on the climate
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
186 |
9.4% |
0.094416244 |
| 2 |
Agree |
597 |
30.3% |
0.303045685 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
526 |
26.7% |
0.267005076 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
346 |
17.6% |
0.175634518 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
143 |
7.3% |
0.072588832 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
115 |
5.8% |
0.058375635 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
51 |
2.6% |
0.025888325 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003045685 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_ceser_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Popular political involvement will not help to solve the
climate problem
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different views about the climate change challenges facing
us. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Popular political involvement will not help to solve the climate problem
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
62 |
3.1% |
0.031472081 |
| 2 |
Agree |
134 |
6.8% |
0.068020305 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
234 |
11.9% |
0.118781726 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
229 |
11.6% |
0.116243655 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
499 |
25.3% |
0.253299492 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
608 |
30.9% |
0.308629442 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
196 |
9.9% |
0.099492386 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.4% |
0.004060914 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_ceser_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norwegian emissions will be damaging for future
generations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different views about the climate change challenges facing
us. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian emissions will be damaging for future generations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
337 |
17.1% |
0.171065990 |
| 2 |
Agree |
583 |
29.6% |
0.295939086 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
497 |
25.2% |
0.252284264 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
217 |
11.0% |
0.110152284 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
148 |
7.5% |
0.075126904 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
115 |
5.8% |
0.058375635 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
65 |
3.3% |
0.032994924 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.4% |
0.004060914 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_ceser_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People in Norway will not notice climate change
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different views about the climate change challenges facing
us. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
People in Norway will not notice climate change
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
28 |
1.4% |
0.014213198 |
| 2 |
Agree |
53 |
2.7% |
0.026903553 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
125 |
6.3% |
0.063451777 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
127 |
6.4% |
0.064467005 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
295 |
15.0% |
0.149746193 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
749 |
38.0% |
0.380203046 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
586 |
29.7% |
0.297461929 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.4% |
0.003553299 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_ceser_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The climate problem will be solved through international
cooperation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different views about the climate change challenges facing
us. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The climate problem will be solved through international cooperation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
486 |
24.7% |
0.246700508 |
| 2 |
Agree |
803 |
40.8% |
0.407614213 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
414 |
21.0% |
0.210152284 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
123 |
6.2% |
0.062436548 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
64 |
3.2% |
0.032487310 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
38 |
1.9% |
0.019289340 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
38 |
1.9% |
0.019289340 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002030457 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_ceser_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: New technology will solve the climate problem
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different views about the climate change challenges facing
us. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
New technology will solve the climate problem
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
111 |
5.6% |
0.056345178 |
| 2 |
Agree |
425 |
21.6% |
0.215736041 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
835 |
42.4% |
0.423857868 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
266 |
13.5% |
0.135025381 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
179 |
9.1% |
0.090862944 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
106 |
5.4% |
0.053807107 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
41 |
2.1% |
0.020812183 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.4% |
0.003553299 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_cemep
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The cost of meat products should be greatly increased in
order to combat climate change.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The cost of meat products should be greatly increased in order to combat
climate change.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
488 |
24.8% |
0.247715736 |
| 2 |
Slightly disagree |
539 |
27.4% |
0.273604061 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
466 |
23.7% |
0.236548223 |
| 4 |
Slightly agree |
382 |
19.4% |
0.193908629 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
89 |
4.5% |
0.045177665 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003045685 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_cemep1
|
Variable label:
|
If you had to choose, agree/disagree: The cost of meat products should
be greatly increased to combat climate change
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You replied that you neither agree nor disagree with the statement “The
cost of meat products should be greatly increased to combat climate
change”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to make a choice, would you be slightly more inclined to
agree or disagree?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_cemep = 3 & r24_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Slightly more inclined to agree |
322 |
69.1% |
0.6909871 |
| 2 |
Slightly more inclined to disagree |
135 |
29.0% |
0.2896996 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.9% |
0.0193133 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9694 |
|
NA |
r24_cepmex_1
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: High electricity prices in order to reduce the amount of
electricity we use
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Various policy measures can be implemented in order to mitigate climate
change or tackle its effects. To what extent are you for or against the
following policy measures in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
High electricity prices in order to reduce the amount of electricity we
use
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly opposed |
930 |
44.7% |
0.446900529 |
| 2 |
Slightly opposed |
524 |
25.2% |
0.251802018 |
| 3 |
Neither for nor against |
182 |
8.7% |
0.087457953 |
| 4 |
Slightly in favour |
362 |
17.4% |
0.173954829 |
| 5 |
Strongly in favour |
69 |
3.3% |
0.033157136 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003363767 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003363767 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_cepmex_2
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: Legislation banning the sale of household appliances that
are not energy-efficient
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Various policy measures can be implemented in order to mitigate climate
change or tackle its effects. To what extent are you for or against the
following policy measures in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Legislation banning the sale of household appliances that are not
energy-efficient
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly opposed |
186 |
8.9% |
0.08938011 |
| 2 |
Slightly opposed |
354 |
17.0% |
0.17011052 |
| 3 |
Neither for nor against |
481 |
23.1% |
0.23113888 |
| 4 |
Slightly in favour |
622 |
29.9% |
0.29889476 |
| 5 |
Strongly in favour |
393 |
18.9% |
0.18885151 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
34 |
1.6% |
0.01633830 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.00528592 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_cepmex_3
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: Using public funds to subsidise insulation of homes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Various policy measures can be implemented in order to mitigate climate
change or tackle its effects. To what extent are you for or against the
following policy measures in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Using public funds to subsidise insulation of homes
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly opposed |
121 |
5.8% |
0.05814512 |
| 2 |
Slightly opposed |
219 |
10.5% |
0.10523787 |
| 3 |
Neither for nor against |
397 |
19.1% |
0.19077367 |
| 4 |
Slightly in favour |
807 |
38.8% |
0.38779433 |
| 5 |
Strongly in favour |
496 |
23.8% |
0.23834695 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
30 |
1.4% |
0.01441615 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.00528592 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_cepmex_4
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: Using public funds in order to subsidise the development of
new renewable energy, such as wind and solar power
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Various policy measures can be implemented in order to mitigate climate
change or tackle its effects. To what extent are you for or against the
following policy measures in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Using public funds in order to subsidise the development of new
renewable energy, such as wind and solar power
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly opposed |
151 |
7.3% |
0.072561269 |
| 2 |
Slightly opposed |
156 |
7.5% |
0.074963960 |
| 3 |
Neither for nor against |
183 |
8.8% |
0.087938491 |
| 4 |
Slightly in favour |
635 |
30.5% |
0.305141759 |
| 5 |
Strongly in favour |
930 |
44.7% |
0.446900529 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008649688 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.4% |
0.003844306 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_cepmex_open
|
Variable label:
|
If you have any comments about the question, please write them here:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Various policy measures can be implemented in order to mitigate climate
change or tackle its effects. To what extent are you for or against the
following policy measures in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments about the question, please write them here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_cpbtax_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_cprtax]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2062] [Invalid:8098]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Blank] |
693 |
33.6% |
0.3360815 |
| 2 |
in rural areas |
695 |
33.7% |
0.3370514 |
| 3 |
in urban areas with living condition challenges |
674 |
32.7% |
0.3268671 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_cpbtax
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad: The state needs to allocate more money for public services
(e.g., schools and health and social services) [r24_cpbtax_ran], even if
that means increasing taxes slightly.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How good or bad do you think the following proposal is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The state needs to allocate more money for public services (e.g.,
schools and health and social services) [r24_cpbtax_ran], even if that
means increasing taxes slightly.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
456 |
22.1% |
0.2211445199 |
| 2 |
Good |
704 |
34.1% |
0.3414161009 |
| 3 |
Fairly good |
360 |
17.5% |
0.1745877789 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
256 |
12.4% |
0.1241513094 |
| 5 |
Fairly bad |
144 |
7.0% |
0.0698351115 |
| 6 |
Bad |
74 |
3.6% |
0.0358874879 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
66 |
3.2% |
0.0320077595 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009699321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_pceum
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
1254 |
12.3% |
0.123425197 |
| 2 |
Positive |
1957 |
19.3% |
0.192618110 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
1625 |
16.0% |
0.159940945 |
| 4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
1128 |
11.1% |
0.111023622 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
1456 |
14.3% |
0.143307087 |
| 6 |
Negative |
1429 |
14.1% |
0.140649606 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
1291 |
12.7% |
0.127066929 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.2% |
0.001968504 |
r24_pceea
|
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
239 |
11.9% |
0.119440280 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
619 |
30.9% |
0.309345327 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
619 |
30.9% |
0.309345327 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
176 |
8.8% |
0.087956022 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
196 |
9.8% |
0.097951024 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
109 |
5.4% |
0.054472764 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
33 |
1.6% |
0.016491754 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004997501 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcnat
|
Variable label:
|
Norways membership status in NATO
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to your point of view:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway should continue to be a member of NATO. |
9733 |
95.8% |
0.95797244 |
| 2 |
Norway should opt out of NATO. |
375 |
3.7% |
0.03690945 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
0.5% |
0.00511811 |
r24_pcnato
|
Variable label:
|
Please write here if you have something you would like to add:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norways membership status in NATO
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please write here if you have something you would like to add:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_innae
|
Variable label:
|
How do you rate the increased military presence of NATO in Eastern
Europe?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NATO has recently increased its military forces and military equipment
in Eastern Europe considerably.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you rate the increased military presence in Eastern Europe?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
3141 |
30.9% |
0.309153543 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
3441 |
33.9% |
0.338681102 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
1496 |
14.7% |
0.147244094 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
1151 |
11.3% |
0.113287402 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
632 |
6.2% |
0.062204724 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
280 |
2.8% |
0.027559055 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.2% |
0.001870079 |
r24_innaeo
|
Variable label:
|
Please write here if you have something you would like to add:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you rate the increased military presence of NATO in Eastern
Europe?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please write here if you have something you would like to add:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_pcimm
|
Variable label:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
584 |
5.7% |
0.057480315 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
2391 |
23.5% |
0.235334646 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
3990 |
39.3% |
0.392716535 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1399 |
13.8% |
0.137696850 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1204 |
11.9% |
0.118503937 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
352 |
3.5% |
0.034645669 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
206 |
2.0% |
0.020275591 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.3% |
0.003346457 |
r24_pcref
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and
their opportunity to be granted residence here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much easier |
46 |
2.3% |
0.022988506 |
| 2 |
Easier |
321 |
16.0% |
0.160419790 |
| 3 |
Somewhat easier |
448 |
22.4% |
0.223888056 |
| 4 |
Same as today |
806 |
40.3% |
0.402798601 |
| 5 |
Slightly more difficult |
180 |
9.0% |
0.089955022 |
| 6 |
More difficult |
105 |
5.2% |
0.052473763 |
| 7 |
Much more difficult |
80 |
4.0% |
0.039980010 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.7% |
0.007496252 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_pcint
|
Variable label:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian
society for integrating refugees?
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian
society for integrating refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
148 |
7.4% |
0.073963018 |
| 2 |
Good |
620 |
31.0% |
0.309845077 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
449 |
22.4% |
0.224387806 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
233 |
11.6% |
0.116441779 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poor |
320 |
16.0% |
0.159920040 |
| 6 |
Poor |
169 |
8.4% |
0.084457771 |
| 7 |
Very poor |
48 |
2.4% |
0.023988006 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.7% |
0.006996502 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_dvformot_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects if [r24_dvfor] or [r24_dvmot] will be
exposed first.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1969] [Invalid:8191]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
dvfor to be asked first |
1019 |
51.8% |
0.5175216 |
| 2 |
dvmot to be asked first |
950 |
48.2% |
0.4824784 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8191 |
|
NA |
r24_dvfor1
|
Variable label:
|
If you had to pick one, what do you think is the best argument for
immigration to Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to pick one, what do you think is the best argument for
immigration to Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3 & dvformot_ran_24 = 1][Text data witheld due
to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvfor2
|
Variable label:
|
How good or bad do you think the following proposal is?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had to pick one, what do you think is the best argument for
immigration to Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad do you think the following proposal is?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
408 |
22.2% |
0.222222222 |
| 2 |
Good |
815 |
44.4% |
0.443899782 |
| 3 |
Fairly good |
318 |
17.3% |
0.173202614 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
168 |
9.2% |
0.091503268 |
| 5 |
Fairly bad |
17 |
0.9% |
0.009259259 |
| 6 |
Bad |
11 |
0.6% |
0.005991285 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003267974 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
93 |
5.1% |
0.050653595 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8324 |
|
NA |
r24_dvmot1
|
Variable label:
|
If you had to pick one, what do you think is the best argument against
immigration to Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to pick one, what do you think is the best argument for
immigration to Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 3 & dvformot_ran_24 = 1][Text data witheld due
to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvmot2
|
Variable label:
|
How good or bad do you think the following proposal is?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you had to pick one, what do you think is the best argument against
immigration to Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad do you think the following proposal is?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
260 |
14.1% |
0.14115092 |
| 2 |
Good |
487 |
26.4% |
0.26438654 |
| 3 |
Fairly good |
403 |
21.9% |
0.21878393 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
267 |
14.5% |
0.14495114 |
| 5 |
Fairly bad |
132 |
7.2% |
0.07166124 |
| 6 |
Bad |
98 |
5.3% |
0.05320304 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
54 |
2.9% |
0.02931596 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
141 |
7.7% |
0.07654723 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8318 |
|
NA |
r24_dvslv
|
Variable label:
|
What is your personal opinion about the issue: Are you mostly for or
against immigration to Norway?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your personal opinion about the issue:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you mostly for or against immigration to Norway?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Mostly for |
1410 |
73.6% |
0.73629243 |
| 2 |
Mostly against |
447 |
23.3% |
0.23342037 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
3.0% |
0.03028721 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8245 |
|
NA |
r24_dvutg_pipe
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an alternative for textpiping in [r24_dvutg]. If the
respondent chose ‘mostly for’ in [r24_dvslv] the value is set to
‘against’ and equally opposite for the other respondents.
|
|
Technical description:
|
A values was not selected for respondents who did not give an answer to
[r24_dvslv].
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1857] [Invalid:8303]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
against |
1410 |
75.9% |
0.7592892 |
| 2 |
for |
447 |
24.1% |
0.2407108 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8303 |
|
NA |
r24_dvutg
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you respect those who are [r24_dvutg_pipe] immigration
to Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you respect those who are [r24_dvutg_pipe] immigration
to Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_dvslv is answered) & r24_group = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
62 |
3.1% |
0.03147208 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
343 |
17.4% |
0.17411168 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
873 |
44.3% |
0.44314721 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
491 |
24.9% |
0.24923858 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
64 |
3.2% |
0.03248731 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
137 |
7.0% |
0.06954315 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8190 |
|
NA |
r24_dvcrmx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
[r24_dvcrmx_ran3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1016] [Invalid:9144]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
discuss |
525 |
51.7% |
0.5167323 |
| 2 |
preach |
491 |
48.3% |
0.4832677 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9144 |
|
NA |
r24_dvcrmx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for
[r24_dvcrmx_ran3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1016] [Invalid:9144]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Islamic values |
493 |
48.5% |
0.4852362 |
| 2 |
conservative ideas about Islamic child-rearing |
523 |
51.5% |
0.5147638 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9144 |
|
NA |
r24_dvcrmx_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_dvcrmx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2081] [Invalid:8079]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A group of Muslims have asked to rent a local assembly hall for a meeting to
[r24_dvcrmx_ran1] [r24_dvcrmx_ran2]. |
1016 |
48.8% |
0.4882268 |
| 2 |
A group of Christians have asked to rent a local assembly hall for a meeting to
preach Christian conservative ideas about child-rearing. |
1065 |
51.2% |
0.5117732 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvcrmx
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: permission to rent the local assembly hall?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[r24_dvcrmx_ran3]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be given
permission to rent the local assembly hall?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
216 |
10.4% |
0.103796252 |
| 2 |
Agree |
460 |
22.1% |
0.221047573 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
280 |
13.5% |
0.134550697 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
401 |
19.3% |
0.192695819 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
228 |
11.0% |
0.109562710 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
217 |
10.4% |
0.104276790 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
273 |
13.1% |
0.131186929 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002883229 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvcrm1x
|
Variable label:
|
We would like to ask you to state the reason for your answer to the
previous question.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Agree/disagree: permission to rent the local assembly hall?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like to ask you to state the reason for your answer to the
previous question.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can write as much or as little as you like. We are looking for all
types of answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_dvcrmx is answered & r24_group = 4]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvmsqx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects group for [r24_dvmsqx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2081] [Invalid:8079]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 (img1) |
448 |
21.5% |
0.2152811 |
| 2 |
Group 2 (img1+img2) |
408 |
19.6% |
0.1960596 |
| 3 |
Group 3 (img1+img3) |
377 |
18.1% |
0.1811629 |
| 4 |
Group 4 (img1+img4) |
427 |
20.5% |
0.2051898 |
| 5 |
Group 5 (img1+img5) |
421 |
20.2% |
0.2023066 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvmsqx
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: muslims should establish such a mosque?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some muslims in Norway are trying to establish a mosque. With the funds
they have raised from muslims in their local Norwegian environment, they
will be able to afford a mosque that looks like this:
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should establish such
a mosque?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[Respondents with [r24_dvmsqx_ran] == 1 were not exposed to any
additional text or image.
Respondents with [r24_dvmsqx_ran] != 1 were exposed to additional text
and image: ‘They have decided to gain additional funding to build a
mosque which looks like this:’]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
129 |
6.2% |
0.061989428 |
| 2 |
Agree |
482 |
23.2% |
0.231619414 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
298 |
14.3% |
0.143200384 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
606 |
29.1% |
0.291206151 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
171 |
8.2% |
0.082172033 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
177 |
8.5% |
0.085055262 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
212 |
10.2% |
0.101874099 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002883229 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvcsfx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_dvcsfx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2081] [Invalid:8079]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
public funds |
352 |
16.9% |
0.1691494 |
| 2 |
municipality |
360 |
17.3% |
0.1729938 |
| 3 |
a regional Muslim organisation in Norway |
328 |
15.8% |
0.1576165 |
| 4 |
a Norwegian non-profit foundation |
305 |
14.7% |
0.1465642 |
| 5 |
a Muslim organisation based in Turkey |
367 |
17.6% |
0.1763575 |
| 6 |
a Muslim organisation based in another European country |
369 |
17.7% |
0.1773186 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvcsfx
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: establishing this community centre funded by
[r24_dvcsfx_ran].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some muslims in Norway want to establish a community centre where they
can meet in their spare time. The community centre will be funded by
[r24_dvcsfx_ran].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree about establishing this
community centre?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
93 |
4.5% |
0.044690053 |
| 2 |
Agree |
369 |
17.7% |
0.177318597 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
312 |
15.0% |
0.149927919 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
434 |
20.9% |
0.208553580 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
260 |
12.5% |
0.124939933 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
316 |
15.2% |
0.151850072 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
284 |
13.6% |
0.136472850 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006246997 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvcenx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_dvcenx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2076] [Invalid:8084]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
build a mosque |
370 |
17.8% |
0.1782274 |
| 2 |
build a combined mosque and youth club |
345 |
16.6% |
0.1661850 |
| 3 |
build a combined mosque and volunteer centre |
339 |
16.3% |
0.1632948 |
| 4 |
extend their mosque |
367 |
17.7% |
0.1767823 |
| 5 |
extend their mosque in order to make room for a youth club |
328 |
15.8% |
0.1579961 |
| 6 |
extend their mosque in order to accommodate a volunteer centre |
327 |
15.8% |
0.1575145 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8084 |
|
NA |
r24_dvcenx
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: A local muslim association wants to [r24_dvcenx_ran].
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
A local muslim association wants to [r24_dvcenx_ran].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you for or against this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely in favour |
172 |
8.3% |
0.08265257 |
| 2 |
In favour |
506 |
24.3% |
0.24315233 |
| 3 |
Slightly in favour |
334 |
16.0% |
0.16049976 |
| 4 |
Neither for nor against |
553 |
26.6% |
0.26573763 |
| 5 |
Slightly opposed |
165 |
7.9% |
0.07928880 |
| 6 |
Opposed |
156 |
7.5% |
0.07496396 |
| 7 |
Completely opposed |
174 |
8.4% |
0.08361365 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.0% |
0.01009130 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvphsx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_dvphsx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2073] [Invalid:8087]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
wants |
730 |
35.2% |
0.3521466 |
| 2 |
has applied for permission to |
673 |
32.5% |
0.3246503 |
| 3 |
has been granted permission to |
670 |
32.3% |
0.3232031 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8087 |
|
NA |
r24_dvphsx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_dvphsx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2073] [Invalid:8087]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Blank] |
1000 |
48.2% |
0.4823927 |
| 2 |
based on models of Christian upper secondary schools |
1073 |
51.8% |
0.5176073 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8087 |
|
NA |
r24_dvphsx
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: Some Norwegian parents want their children to become better
acquainted with Islam and [r24_dvphsx_ran1] to establish a muslim upper
secondary school. The school will comply with the Norwegian curriculum,
but also teach Islam [r24_dvphsx_ran2]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Norwegian parents want their children to become better acquainted
with Islam and [r24_dvphsx_ran1] to establish a muslim upper secondary
school. The school will comply with the Norwegian curriculum, but also
teach Islam [r24_dvphsx_ran2].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you for or against this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely in favour |
51 |
2.5% |
0.02450745 |
| 2 |
In favour |
179 |
8.6% |
0.08601634 |
| 3 |
Slightly in favour |
222 |
10.7% |
0.10667948 |
| 4 |
Neither for nor against |
387 |
18.6% |
0.18596828 |
| 5 |
Slightly opposed |
285 |
13.7% |
0.13695339 |
| 6 |
Opposed |
461 |
22.2% |
0.22152811 |
| 7 |
Completely opposed |
472 |
22.7% |
0.22681403 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.2% |
0.01153292 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dviec
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative would you say that immigration is for the
Norwegian economy?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative would you say that immigration is for the
Norwegian economy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
101 |
4.9% |
0.04898157 |
| 2 |
Positive |
578 |
28.0% |
0.28031038 |
| 3 |
Slightly positive |
598 |
29.0% |
0.29000970 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
325 |
15.8% |
0.15761397 |
| 5 |
Slightly negative |
258 |
12.5% |
0.12512124 |
| 6 |
Negative |
112 |
5.4% |
0.05431620 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
67 |
3.2% |
0.03249273 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.1% |
0.01115422 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_dvicu
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative would you say that immigration is for Norwegian
cultural life?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative would you say that immigration is for Norwegian
cultural life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
249 |
12.1% |
0.120756547 |
| 2 |
Positive |
731 |
35.5% |
0.354510184 |
| 3 |
Slightly positive |
503 |
24.4% |
0.243937924 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
347 |
16.8% |
0.168283220 |
| 5 |
Slightly negative |
98 |
4.8% |
0.047526673 |
| 6 |
Negative |
78 |
3.8% |
0.037827352 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
38 |
1.8% |
0.018428710 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008729389 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_dviri
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative would you say it is for people from other
countries have the right to immigrate to Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative would you say it is for people from other
countries have the right to immigrate to Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
222 |
10.8% |
0.107662464 |
| 2 |
Positive |
636 |
30.8% |
0.308438409 |
| 3 |
Slightly positive |
496 |
24.1% |
0.240543162 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
315 |
15.3% |
0.152764306 |
| 5 |
Slightly negative |
210 |
10.2% |
0.101842871 |
| 6 |
Negative |
110 |
5.3% |
0.053346266 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
62 |
3.0% |
0.030067895 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005334627 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_dvstex_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects group for [r24_dvstex]-questions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2062] [Invalid:8098]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Experiment group 1 |
995 |
48.3% |
0.4825412 |
| 2 |
Experiment group 2 |
1067 |
51.7% |
0.5174588 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_dvstex_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects [r24_dvstex1], [r24_dvstex2], or
[r24_dvstex3] if [r24_dvstex_ran1] == 1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if [r24_dvstex_ran1] = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:995] [Invalid:9165]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
r24_dvstex1 (A) |
314 |
31.6% |
0.3155779 |
| 2 |
r24_dvstex2 (B) |
354 |
35.6% |
0.3557789 |
| 3 |
r24_dvstex3 (C) |
327 |
32.9% |
0.3286432 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9165 |
|
NA |
r24_dvstex1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your view of immigrants: Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you personally view immigrants. According to your
personal view, to what extent are immigrants:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_dvstex_ran1 = 2 | r24_dvstex_ran2 = 1) & r24_group =
5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
10 |
0.7% |
0.00724113 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
90 |
6.5% |
0.06517017 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
590 |
42.7% |
0.42722665 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
586 |
42.4% |
0.42433020 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
78 |
5.6% |
0.05648081 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2.0% |
0.01955105 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8779 |
|
NA |
r24_dvstex1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Your view of immigrants: Competent (skilled, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you personally view immigrants. According to your
personal view, to what extent are immigrants:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilled, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_dvstex_ran1 = 2 | r24_dvstex_ran2 = 1) & r24_group =
5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
14 |
1.0% |
0.01013758 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
102 |
7.4% |
0.07385952 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
699 |
50.6% |
0.50615496 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
481 |
34.8% |
0.34829833 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
54 |
3.9% |
0.03910210 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.2% |
0.02244750 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8779 |
|
NA |
r24_dvstex2_1
|
Variable label:
|
General view of immigrants: Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how immigrants are regarded by people in Norway in
general. According to the general view of other people, to what extent
are immigrants:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_dvstex_ran1 = 2 | r24_dvstex_ran2 = 2) & r24_group =
5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01266714 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
248 |
17.5% |
0.17452498 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
830 |
58.4% |
0.58409571 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
288 |
20.3% |
0.20267417 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01266714 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.3% |
0.01337087 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8739 |
|
NA |
r24_dvstex2_2
|
Variable label:
|
General view of immigrants: Competent (skilled, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how immigrants are regarded by people in Norway in
general. According to the general view of other people, to what extent
are immigrants:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilled, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_dvstex_ran1 = 2 | r24_dvstex_ran2 = 2) & r24_group =
5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
32 |
2.3% |
0.022519353 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
339 |
23.9% |
0.238564391 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
801 |
56.4% |
0.563687544 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
207 |
14.6% |
0.145672062 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
14 |
1.0% |
0.009852217 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
2.0% |
0.019704433 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8739 |
|
NA |
r24_dvstex_order
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Gives the order in which [r24_dvstex1] and [r24_dvstex2]
were posed.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1067] [Invalid:9093]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvstex3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your view of immigrants during job interview: Warm (friendly, kind,
honest)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine you’re having a job interview for a well-paid job that you
really want. How would you answer this question then? Think about how
you personally view immigrants. According to your personal view, to what
extent are immigrants:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_dvstex_ran2 = 3 & r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
6 |
1.8% |
0.01834862 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
10 |
3.1% |
0.03058104 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
128 |
39.1% |
0.39143731 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
158 |
48.3% |
0.48318043 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
17 |
5.2% |
0.05198777 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
2.4% |
0.02446483 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9833 |
|
NA |
r24_dvstex3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Your view of immigrants during job interview: Competent (skilled,
self-assured, clever)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine you’re having a job interview for a well-paid job that you
really want. How would you answer this question then? Think about how
you personally view immigrants. According to your personal view, to what
extent are immigrants:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilled, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_dvstex_ran2 = 3 & r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006116208 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
16 |
4.9% |
0.048929664 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
148 |
45.3% |
0.452599388 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
136 |
41.6% |
0.415902141 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
17 |
5.2% |
0.051987768 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
2.4% |
0.024464832 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9833 |
|
NA |
r24_dvstex4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Last time, your view of immigrants during job interview: Warm (friendly,
kind, honest)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you to answer this question one last time. Imagine
you’re having a job interview for a well-paid job that you really want.
How would you answer this question then? Think about how you personally
view immigrants. According to your personal view, to what extent are
immigrants:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_dvstex_ran1 = 2 & r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
7 |
0.7% |
0.00656045 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
48 |
4.5% |
0.04498594 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
442 |
41.4% |
0.41424555 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
487 |
45.6% |
0.45641987 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
64 |
6.0% |
0.05998126 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.8% |
0.01780694 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9093 |
|
NA |
r24_dvstex4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Last time, your view of immigrants during job interview: Competent
(skilled, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you to answer this question one last time. Imagine
you’re having a job interview for a well-paid job that you really want.
How would you answer this question then? Think about how you personally
view immigrants. According to your personal view, to what extent are
immigrants:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilled, self-assured, clever)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_dvstex_ran1 = 2 & r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
11 |
1.0% |
0.01030928 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
49 |
4.6% |
0.04592315 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
501 |
47.0% |
0.46954077 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
433 |
40.6% |
0.40581068 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
53 |
5.0% |
0.04967198 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.9% |
0.01874414 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9093 |
|
NA |
r24_dvase_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with asylum seekers: Greeted some of the asylum seekers.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Greeted some of the asylum seekers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
3123 |
30.7% |
0.30738189 |
| 2 |
No |
5357 |
52.7% |
0.52726378 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
1268 |
12.5% |
0.12480315 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
412 |
4.1% |
0.04055118 |
r24_dvase_2
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with asylum seekers: Had contact via the internet with
asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Had contact via the internet with asylum seekers (for example Facebook
or Finn).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
544 |
5.4% |
0.05354331 |
| 2 |
No |
7687 |
75.7% |
0.75659449 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
1446 |
14.2% |
0.14232283 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
483 |
4.8% |
0.04753937 |
r24_dvase_3
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with asylum seekers: Become friends with some of the
asylum seekers.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Become friends with some of the asylum seekers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1171 |
11.5% |
0.11525591 |
| 2 |
No |
7031 |
69.2% |
0.69202756 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
1506 |
14.8% |
0.14822835 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
452 |
4.4% |
0.04448819 |
r24_dvase_4
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with asylum seekers: Become a member of a support group
for asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Become a member of a support group for asylum seekers (for example on
the net).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
578 |
5.7% |
0.05688976 |
| 2 |
No |
7779 |
76.6% |
0.76564961 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
1321 |
13.0% |
0.13001969 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
482 |
4.7% |
0.04744094 |
r24_dvase_5
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with asylum seekers: Expressed scepticism towards asylum
seekers to others.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Expressed scepticism towards asylum seekers to others.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
700 |
6.9% |
0.06889764 |
| 2 |
No |
8020 |
78.9% |
0.78937008 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
978 |
9.6% |
0.09625984 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
462 |
4.5% |
0.04547244 |
r24_dvase_6
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with asylum seekers: Avoided the asylum seekers as far
as possible.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Avoided the asylum seekers as far as possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
234 |
2.3% |
0.02303150 |
| 2 |
No |
7500 |
73.8% |
0.73818898 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
1959 |
19.3% |
0.19281496 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
467 |
4.6% |
0.04596457 |
r24_dvase_7
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with asylum seekers: Donated money, clothing or
equipment
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Donated money, clothing or equipment
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
4466 |
44.0% |
0.43956693 |
| 2 |
No |
4521 |
44.5% |
0.44498031 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
848 |
8.3% |
0.08346457 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
325 |
3.2% |
0.03198819 |
r24_dvase_8
|
Variable label:
|
Your experience with asylum seekers: Have had asylum seekers living in
my house
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been? I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have had asylum seekers living in my house
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
124 |
1.2% |
0.01220472 |
| 2 |
No |
8303 |
81.7% |
0.81722441 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
1248 |
12.3% |
0.12283465 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
485 |
4.8% |
0.04773622 |
r24_dvaso
|
Variable label:
|
I have other experiences. Please write:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
I have other experiences.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please write:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvasi
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent have you thought about or imagined what it is like to
arrive in Norway as an asylum seeker?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent have you thought about or imagined what it is like to
arrive in Norway as an asylum seeker?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
756 |
7.4% |
0.074409449 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
2428 |
23.9% |
0.238976378 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
5067 |
49.9% |
0.498720472 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
1359 |
13.4% |
0.133759843 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
454 |
4.5% |
0.044685039 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
96 |
0.9% |
0.009448819 |
r24_mlmrm
|
Variable label:
|
Do you live in a merged municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you live in a merged municipality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
646 |
32.3% |
0.322838581 |
| 2 |
No |
1336 |
66.8% |
0.667666167 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009495252 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlmrr
|
Variable label:
|
Do you live in a merged county?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you live in a merged county?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1360 |
68.0% |
0.679660170 |
| 2 |
No |
621 |
31.0% |
0.310344828 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.0% |
0.009995002 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlat_1
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The municipality you lived in before
it was merged
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The municipality you lived in before it was merged
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r24_group = 1] and [r24_mlmrm] = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
210 |
32.5% |
0.32507740 |
| 2 |
Connection |
217 |
33.6% |
0.33591331 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
111 |
17.2% |
0.17182663 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
67 |
10.4% |
0.10371517 |
| 5 |
No connection |
28 |
4.3% |
0.04334365 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
2.0% |
0.02012384 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9514 |
|
NA |
r24_mlat_2
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The municipality you live in after it
was merged
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The municipality you live in after it was merged
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r24_group = 1] and [r24_mlmrm] = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
164 |
25.4% |
0.25386997 |
| 2 |
Connection |
221 |
34.2% |
0.34210526 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
130 |
20.1% |
0.20123839 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
92 |
14.2% |
0.14241486 |
| 5 |
No connection |
30 |
4.6% |
0.04643963 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.4% |
0.01393189 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9514 |
|
NA |
r24_mlat_3
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The county you lived in before it was
merged
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The county you lived in before it was merged
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r24_group = 1] and [r24_mlmrr] = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
327 |
24.0% |
0.240441176 |
| 2 |
Connection |
452 |
33.2% |
0.332352941 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
271 |
19.9% |
0.199264706 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
225 |
16.5% |
0.165441176 |
| 5 |
No connection |
73 |
5.4% |
0.053676471 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008823529 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8800 |
|
NA |
r24_mlat_4
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The county you live in after it was
merged
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The county you live in after it was merged
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r24_group = 1] and [r24_mlmrr] = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
121 |
8.9% |
0.08897059 |
| 2 |
Connection |
329 |
24.2% |
0.24191176 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
320 |
23.5% |
0.23529412 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
402 |
29.6% |
0.29558824 |
| 5 |
No connection |
173 |
12.7% |
0.12720588 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
1.1% |
0.01102941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8800 |
|
NA |
r24_mlat_5
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The municipality you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The municipality you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r24_group = 1] and [r24_mlmrm] = 2 or [r24_mlmrm] is not
answered]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
532 |
39.7% |
0.397014925 |
| 2 |
Connection |
494 |
36.9% |
0.368656716 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
194 |
14.5% |
0.144776119 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
86 |
6.4% |
0.064179104 |
| 5 |
No connection |
24 |
1.8% |
0.017910448 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007462687 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8820 |
|
NA |
r24_mlat_6
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The county you live in
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The county you live in
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r24_group = 1] and [r24_mlmrr] = 2 or [r24_mlmrr] is
unanswered]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
195 |
31.2% |
0.31150160 |
| 2 |
Connection |
212 |
33.9% |
0.33865815 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
119 |
19.0% |
0.19009585 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
60 |
9.6% |
0.09584665 |
| 5 |
No connection |
24 |
3.8% |
0.03833866 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
2.6% |
0.02555911 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9534 |
|
NA |
r24_mlat_7
|
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r24_group = 1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong connection |
1438 |
71.9% |
0.718640680 |
| 2 |
Connection |
435 |
21.7% |
0.217391304 |
| 3 |
Some connection |
70 |
3.5% |
0.034982509 |
| 4 |
Small connection |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004997501 |
| 5 |
No connection |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002998501 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2.1% |
0.020989505 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlsmm_1
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Further merging of municipalities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January 2020.
Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this has
recently been the subject of debate. Some people support additional
mergers, while others believe that county councils/municipalities should
be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Yet others want
the municipalities and county councils to remain as they are today. How
strongly do you support these various views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Further merging of municipalities.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
121 |
6.0% |
0.06046977 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
208 |
10.4% |
0.10394803 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
407 |
20.3% |
0.20339830 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
528 |
26.4% |
0.26386807 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
343 |
17.1% |
0.17141429 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
202 |
10.1% |
0.10094953 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
154 |
7.7% |
0.07696152 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
1.9% |
0.01899050 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlsmm_2
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Retain the present number of
municipalities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January 2020.
Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this has
recently been the subject of debate. Some people support additional
mergers, while others believe that county councils/municipalities should
be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Yet others want
the municipalities and county councils to remain as they are today. How
strongly do you support these various views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Retain the present number of municipalities.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
62 |
3.1% |
0.03098451 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
173 |
8.6% |
0.08645677 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
324 |
16.2% |
0.16191904 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
838 |
41.9% |
0.41879060 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
355 |
17.7% |
0.17741129 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
140 |
7.0% |
0.06996502 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
65 |
3.2% |
0.03248376 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.2% |
0.02198901 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlsmm_3
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Give municipalities the opportunity to
assume their original form.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January 2020.
Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this has
recently been the subject of debate. Some people support additional
mergers, while others believe that county councils/municipalities should
be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Yet others want
the municipalities and county councils to remain as they are today. How
strongly do you support these various views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give municipalities the opportunity to assume their original form.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
182 |
9.1% |
0.09095452 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
249 |
12.4% |
0.12443778 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
456 |
22.8% |
0.22788606 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
409 |
20.4% |
0.20439780 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
305 |
15.2% |
0.15242379 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
205 |
10.2% |
0.10244878 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
157 |
7.8% |
0.07846077 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
1.9% |
0.01899050 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlsmr_1
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Further merging of county councils.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January 2020.
Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this has
recently been the subject of debate. Some people support additional
mergers, while others believe that county councils/municipalities should
be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Yet others want
the municipalities and county councils to remain as they are today. How
strongly do you support these various views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Further merging of county councils.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
103 |
5.1% |
0.05147426 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
109 |
5.4% |
0.05447276 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
224 |
11.2% |
0.11194403 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
599 |
29.9% |
0.29935032 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
397 |
19.8% |
0.19840080 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
311 |
15.5% |
0.15542229 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
214 |
10.7% |
0.10694653 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.2% |
0.02198901 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlsmr_2
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Retain the present number of county
councils.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January 2020.
Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this has
recently been the subject of debate. Some people support additional
mergers, while others believe that county councils/municipalities should
be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Yet others want
the municipalities and county councils to remain as they are today. How
strongly do you support these various views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Retain the present number of county councils.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
62 |
3.1% |
0.03098451 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
168 |
8.4% |
0.08395802 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
344 |
17.2% |
0.17191404 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
836 |
41.8% |
0.41779110 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
298 |
14.9% |
0.14892554 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
143 |
7.1% |
0.07146427 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
102 |
5.1% |
0.05097451 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
2.4% |
0.02398801 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlsmr_3
|
Variable label:
|
How strongly do you support: Give county councils the opportunity to
assume their original form.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January 2020.
Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this has
recently been the subject of debate. Some people support additional
mergers, while others believe that county councils/municipalities should
be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Yet others want
the municipalities and county councils to remain as they are today. How
strongly do you support these various views?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give county councils the opportunity to assume their original form.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
227 |
11.3% |
0.11344328 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
270 |
13.5% |
0.13493253 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
477 |
23.8% |
0.23838081 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
389 |
19.4% |
0.19440280 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
254 |
12.7% |
0.12693653 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
167 |
8.3% |
0.08345827 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
177 |
8.8% |
0.08845577 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.0% |
0.01999000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mltam
|
Variable label:
|
Which of the following statements is closest to your point of view:
Municipalities:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As well as a debate about merging municipalities and county councils,
there is also a debate about whether or not the division of work between
different levels of government should change. If one level is assigned
new tasks, it usually means that another level loses responsibility for
those tasks. Which of the following statements is closest to your point
of view.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Municipalities:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
should have more tasks |
575 |
28.7% |
0.28735632 |
| 2 |
should keep the tasks that they have |
1115 |
55.7% |
0.55722139 |
| 3 |
should have fewer tasks |
254 |
12.7% |
0.12693653 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
2.8% |
0.02848576 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mltar
|
Variable label:
|
Which of the following statements is closest to your point of view:
County authorities:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As well as a debate about merging municipalities and county councils,
there is also a debate about whether or not the division of work between
different levels of government should change. If one level is assigned
new tasks, it usually means that another level loses responsibility for
those tasks. Which of the following statements is closest to your point
of view.
|
|
Literal question:
|
County authorities:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
should have more tasks |
393 |
19.6% |
0.19640180 |
| 2 |
should keep the tasks that they have |
769 |
38.4% |
0.38430785 |
| 3 |
should have fewer tasks |
310 |
15.5% |
0.15492254 |
| 4 |
should be closed down |
472 |
23.6% |
0.23588206 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
2.8% |
0.02848576 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mleff1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: My municipality is too small to implement the policies
for which it is responsible (e.g. primary schools, retirement and
nursing homes and local roads) in an efficient and appropriate manner.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people believe that their municipalities or county councils are too
small to effectively and appropriately carry out the political work for
which they are responsible because their budgets are too small or
because they have too few employees. To what extent do you agree or
disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
My municipality is too small to implement the policies for which it is
responsible (e.g. primary schools, retirement and nursing homes and
local roads) in an efficient and appropriate manner.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
32 |
1.6% |
0.01599200 |
| 2 |
Agree |
88 |
4.4% |
0.04397801 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
171 |
8.5% |
0.08545727 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
325 |
16.2% |
0.16241879 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
207 |
10.3% |
0.10344828 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
684 |
34.2% |
0.34182909 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
447 |
22.3% |
0.22338831 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
47 |
2.3% |
0.02348826 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mleff1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: My county council is too small to implement the policies
for which it is responsible (e.g. upper secondary schools, dental health
services and county roads) in an efficient and appropriate manner
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people believe that their municipalities or county councils are too
small to effectively and appropriately carry out the political work for
which they are responsible because their budgets are too small or
because they have too few employees. To what extent do you agree or
disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
My county council is too small to implement the policies for which it is
responsible (e.g. upper secondary schools, dental health services and
county roads) in an efficient and appropriate manner
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01449275 |
| 2 |
Agree |
46 |
2.3% |
0.02298851 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
88 |
4.4% |
0.04397801 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
407 |
20.3% |
0.20339830 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
215 |
10.7% |
0.10744628 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
684 |
34.2% |
0.34182909 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
479 |
23.9% |
0.23938031 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
53 |
2.6% |
0.02648676 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mleff2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: My municipality is too big because it has many residents
with differing views on policy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people believe that their municipalities or county councils are too
large because they have too many residents with differing views about
what might be the best policy for them. For example, in many
municipalities and county councils there is a debate about the locations
of kindergartens, schools or health centres within the municipalities
and county councils concerned. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
My municipality is too big because it has many residents with differing
views on policy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
37 |
1.8% |
0.01849075 |
| 2 |
Agree |
85 |
4.2% |
0.04247876 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
129 |
6.4% |
0.06446777 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
464 |
23.2% |
0.23188406 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
185 |
9.2% |
0.09245377 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
656 |
32.8% |
0.32783608 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
392 |
19.6% |
0.19590205 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
53 |
2.6% |
0.02648676 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mleff2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: My county council is too big because it has many
residents with differing views on policy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people believe that their municipalities or county councils are too
large because they have too many residents with differing views about
what might be the best policy for them. For example, in many
municipalities and county councils there is a debate about the locations
of kindergartens, schools or health centres within the municipalities
and county councils concerned. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
My county council is too big because it has many residents with
differing views on policy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
146 |
7.3% |
0.07296352 |
| 2 |
Agree |
199 |
9.9% |
0.09945027 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
224 |
11.2% |
0.11194403 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
509 |
25.4% |
0.25437281 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
144 |
7.2% |
0.07196402 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
446 |
22.3% |
0.22288856 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
275 |
13.7% |
0.13743128 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
2.9% |
0.02898551 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlcol1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Your municipality and neighbouring municipalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people believe that their municipalities or county councils ought
to cooperate more with other municipalities, county councils or with the
national authorities in order to improve public services. For example,
cooperation might involve a financial contribution from one authority to
another, or regular meetings between authorities. Do you think that the
services for which your municipality is responsible (e.g. primary
schools, retirement and nursing homes and local roads) will become
better or worse if they cooperate more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your municipality and neighbouring municipalities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much better |
92 |
4.6% |
0.04597701 |
| 2 |
Better |
504 |
25.2% |
0.25187406 |
| 3 |
Slightly better |
358 |
17.9% |
0.17891054 |
| 4 |
Neither better nor worse |
757 |
37.8% |
0.37831084 |
| 5 |
Slightly worse |
102 |
5.1% |
0.05097451 |
| 6 |
Worse |
107 |
5.3% |
0.05347326 |
| 7 |
Much worse |
21 |
1.0% |
0.01049475 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
3.0% |
0.02998501 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlcol1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Your municipality and your county
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people believe that their municipalities or county councils ought
to cooperate more with other municipalities, county councils or with the
national authorities in order to improve public services. For example,
cooperation might involve a financial contribution from one authority to
another, or regular meetings between authorities. Do you think that the
services for which your municipality is responsible (e.g. primary
schools, retirement and nursing homes and local roads) will become
better or worse if they cooperate more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your municipality and your county
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much better |
91 |
4.5% |
0.04547726 |
| 2 |
Better |
426 |
21.3% |
0.21289355 |
| 3 |
Slightly better |
421 |
21.0% |
0.21039480 |
| 4 |
Neither better nor worse |
815 |
40.7% |
0.40729635 |
| 5 |
Slightly worse |
85 |
4.2% |
0.04247876 |
| 6 |
Worse |
74 |
3.7% |
0.03698151 |
| 7 |
Much worse |
22 |
1.1% |
0.01099450 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
3.3% |
0.03348326 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlcol1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Your municipality and the government
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people believe that their municipalities or county councils ought
to cooperate more with other municipalities, county councils or with the
national authorities in order to improve public services. For example,
cooperation might involve a financial contribution from one authority to
another, or regular meetings between authorities. Do you think that the
services for which your municipality is responsible (e.g. primary
schools, retirement and nursing homes and local roads) will become
better or worse if they cooperate more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your municipality and the government
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much better |
124 |
6.2% |
0.06196902 |
| 2 |
Better |
486 |
24.3% |
0.24287856 |
| 3 |
Slightly better |
410 |
20.5% |
0.20489755 |
| 4 |
Neither better nor worse |
751 |
37.5% |
0.37531234 |
| 5 |
Slightly worse |
78 |
3.9% |
0.03898051 |
| 6 |
Worse |
60 |
3.0% |
0.02998501 |
| 7 |
Much worse |
21 |
1.0% |
0.01049475 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
3.5% |
0.03548226 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlcol2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Your county council and neighbouring counties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the services for which your county council is
responsible (e.g. upper secondary schools, dental health services and
county roads) will become better or worse if they cooperate more:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your county council and neighbouring counties
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much better |
73 |
3.6% |
0.03648176 |
| 2 |
Better |
365 |
18.2% |
0.18240880 |
| 3 |
Slightly better |
350 |
17.5% |
0.17491254 |
| 4 |
Neither better nor worse |
921 |
46.0% |
0.46026987 |
| 5 |
Slightly worse |
99 |
4.9% |
0.04947526 |
| 6 |
Worse |
87 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
| 7 |
Much worse |
27 |
1.3% |
0.01349325 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
79 |
3.9% |
0.03948026 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlcol2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Your county council and the municipalities in your
county
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the services for which your county council is
responsible (e.g. upper secondary schools, dental health services and
county roads) will become better or worse if they cooperate more:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your county council and the municipalities in your county
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much better |
80 |
4.0% |
0.039980010 |
| 2 |
Better |
425 |
21.2% |
0.212393803 |
| 3 |
Slightly better |
469 |
23.4% |
0.234382809 |
| 4 |
Neither better nor worse |
821 |
41.0% |
0.410294853 |
| 5 |
Slightly worse |
60 |
3.0% |
0.029985007 |
| 6 |
Worse |
53 |
2.6% |
0.026486757 |
| 7 |
Much worse |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006496752 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
80 |
4.0% |
0.039980010 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_mlcol2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Your county council and the government
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the services for which your county council is
responsible (e.g. upper secondary schools, dental health services and
county roads) will become better or worse if they cooperate more:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your county council and the government
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much better |
114 |
5.7% |
0.056971514 |
| 2 |
Better |
444 |
22.2% |
0.221889055 |
| 3 |
Slightly better |
394 |
19.7% |
0.196901549 |
| 4 |
Neither better nor worse |
817 |
40.8% |
0.408295852 |
| 5 |
Slightly worse |
68 |
3.4% |
0.033983008 |
| 6 |
Worse |
63 |
3.1% |
0.031484258 |
| 7 |
Much worse |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008995502 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
4.1% |
0.041479260 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8159 |
|
NA |
r24_cefee_1
|
Variable label:
|
With regard to climate change, how strongly do you experience: Hope
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hope
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
92 |
4.5% |
0.04496579 |
| 2 |
A little |
402 |
19.6% |
0.19648094 |
| 3 |
To a degree |
1066 |
52.1% |
0.52101662 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
398 |
19.5% |
0.19452590 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
60 |
2.9% |
0.02932551 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.4% |
0.01368524 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_cefee_2
|
Variable label:
|
With regard to climate change, how strongly do you experience: Fear
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
238 |
11.6% |
0.11632454 |
| 2 |
A little |
568 |
27.8% |
0.27761486 |
| 3 |
To a degree |
879 |
43.0% |
0.42961877 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
269 |
13.1% |
0.13147605 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
67 |
3.3% |
0.03274682 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.2% |
0.01221896 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_cefee_3
|
Variable label:
|
With regard to climate change, how strongly do you experience: Sadness
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sadness
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
245 |
12.0% |
0.11974585 |
| 2 |
A little |
455 |
22.2% |
0.22238514 |
| 3 |
To a degree |
779 |
38.1% |
0.38074291 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
401 |
19.6% |
0.19599218 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
142 |
6.9% |
0.06940371 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.2% |
0.01173021 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_cefee_4
|
Variable label:
|
With regard to climate change, how strongly do you experience: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
397 |
19.4% |
0.19403715 |
| 2 |
A little |
653 |
31.9% |
0.31915934 |
| 3 |
To a degree |
660 |
32.3% |
0.32258065 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
216 |
10.6% |
0.10557185 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
84 |
4.1% |
0.04105572 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
1.8% |
0.01759531 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_cefee_5
|
Variable label:
|
With regard to climate change, how strongly do you experience: Guilt
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Guilt
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
372 |
18.2% |
0.18181818 |
| 2 |
A little |
693 |
33.9% |
0.33870968 |
| 3 |
To a degree |
820 |
40.1% |
0.40078201 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
106 |
5.2% |
0.05180841 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
25 |
1.2% |
0.01221896 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.5% |
0.01466276 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_ceang
|
Variable label:
|
What is it about climate change that makes you angry?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is it about climate change that makes you angry?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing that comes to mind. All types of
responses are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few
words if you prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_cefee_4 = 3,4,5 & r24_group = 2]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_cemor
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you regard it as a moral duty for individuals to
contribute towards preventing climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what degree do you regard it as a moral duty for individuals to
contribute towards preventing climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
471 |
23.0% |
0.230205279 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
862 |
42.1% |
0.421309873 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
551 |
26.9% |
0.269305963 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
109 |
5.3% |
0.053274682 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
48 |
2.3% |
0.023460411 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002443793 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_celim
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I am trying to limit climate emissions in my everyday
life.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am trying to limit climate emissions in my everyday life.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
314 |
15.3% |
0.1534701857 |
| 2 |
Agree |
924 |
45.2% |
0.4516129032 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
548 |
26.8% |
0.2678396872 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
156 |
7.6% |
0.0762463343 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
35 |
1.7% |
0.0171065494 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
32 |
1.6% |
0.0156402737 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
35 |
1.7% |
0.0171065494 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009775171 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_cefeg
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I would support a political proposal to increase taxes
on petrol and diesel.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I would support a political proposal to increase taxes on petrol and
diesel.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
188 |
9.2% |
0.091886608 |
| 2 |
Agree |
243 |
11.9% |
0.118768328 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
309 |
15.1% |
0.151026393 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
246 |
12.0% |
0.120234604 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
208 |
10.2% |
0.101661779 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
333 |
16.3% |
0.162756598 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
500 |
24.4% |
0.244379277 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009286413 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_cecpr
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It is likely that I will take part in a climate protest
during the next 12 months.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is likely that I will take part in a climate protest during the next
12 months
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
41 |
2.0% |
0.020039101 |
| 2 |
Agree |
92 |
4.5% |
0.044965787 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
151 |
7.4% |
0.073802542 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
360 |
17.6% |
0.175953079 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
167 |
8.2% |
0.081622678 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
481 |
23.5% |
0.235092864 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
746 |
36.5% |
0.364613881 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.4% |
0.003910068 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_cemeax_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_cemeax]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2043] [Invalid:8117]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
offer meat-free meals |
999 |
48.9% |
0.4889868 |
| 2 |
have a meat-free day once per week |
1044 |
51.1% |
0.5110132 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8117 |
|
NA |
r24_cemeax_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_cemeax]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2043] [Invalid:8117]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selects r24_cemeax1 |
1028 |
50.3% |
0.5031816 |
| 2 |
Selects r24_cemeax2 |
1015 |
49.7% |
0.4968184 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8117 |
|
NA |
r24_cemeax1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that canteens should
[r24_cemeax_ran1] in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that canteens should
[r24_cemeax_ran1] in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_cemeax_ran2 = 1 & r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
360 |
35.0% |
0.350194553 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
240 |
23.3% |
0.233463035 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
129 |
12.5% |
0.125486381 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
293 |
28.5% |
0.285019455 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.6% |
0.005836576 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9132 |
|
NA |
r24_cemeax2
|
Variable label:
|
Your assessment: Is there a majority or minority in Norway who believe
that canteens should [r24_cemeax_ran1] in order to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your assessment:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is there a majority or minority in Norway who believe that canteens
should [r24_cemeax_ran1] in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_cemeax_ran2 = 2 & r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A majority |
248 |
24.4% |
0.24433498 |
| 2 |
A minority |
748 |
73.7% |
0.73694581 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.9% |
0.01871921 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9145 |
|
NA |
r24_cemea
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: We should eat less meat than we do today in order to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should eat less meat than we do today in order to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
344 |
16.8% |
0.168132942 |
| 2 |
Agree |
441 |
21.6% |
0.215542522 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
432 |
21.1% |
0.211143695 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
288 |
14.1% |
0.140762463 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
119 |
5.8% |
0.058162268 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
203 |
9.9% |
0.099217986 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
214 |
10.5% |
0.104594330 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002443793 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_ceinax_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_ceinax]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2042] [Invalid:8118]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
female |
989 |
48.4% |
0.4843291 |
| 2 |
male |
1053 |
51.6% |
0.5156709 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8118 |
|
NA |
r24_ceinax_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_ceinax]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2042] [Invalid:8118]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Blank] |
675 |
33.1% |
0.3305583 |
| 2 |
and is obviously angry that not enough is being done |
684 |
33.5% |
0.3349657 |
| 3 |
and is obviously sad that not enough is being done |
683 |
33.4% |
0.3344760 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8118 |
|
NA |
r24_ceinax_1
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of confidence in: Scientists telling that we are currently unable
to keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following situation:
A [r24_ceinax_ran1] scientist is being interviewed about climate
change on a TV news programme. The scientist tells us that we are
currently unable to achieve our goal of keeping global warming below 1.5
degrees [r24_ceinax_ran2].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you have confidence in the information provided by
this person?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
107 |
5.2% |
0.052297165 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
217 |
10.6% |
0.106060606 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
659 |
32.2% |
0.322091887 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
745 |
36.4% |
0.364125122 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
300 |
14.7% |
0.146627566 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008797654 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_ceinax_2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you take seriously: Scientists telling that we are
currently unable to keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following situation:
A [r24_ceinax_ran1] scientist is being interviewed about climate
change on a TV news programme. The scientist tells us that we are
currently unable to achieve our goal of keeping global warming below 1.5
degrees[r24_ceinax_ran2].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you take the scientist seriously?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
86 |
4.2% |
0.04203324 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
221 |
10.8% |
0.10801564 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
654 |
32.0% |
0.31964809 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
764 |
37.3% |
0.37341153 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
292 |
14.3% |
0.14271750 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01417400 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_dvetn_1
|
Variable label:
|
Identify as: Norwegian
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick multiple boxes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvetn_2
|
Variable label:
|
Identify as: Sami
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sami
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick multiple boxes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvetn_3
|
Variable label:
|
Identify as: Kven/Norwegian Finnish
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Kven/Norwegian Finnish
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick multiple boxes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvetn_4
|
Variable label:
|
Identify as: Forest Finn
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Forest Finn
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick multiple boxes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvetn_5
|
Variable label:
|
Identify as: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick multiple boxes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvetn_5_other
|
Variable label:
|
Identify as: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick multiple boxes.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvtck
|
Variable label:
|
Are you aware that the Storting (the Norwegian parliament) has appointed
a special truth and reconciliation commission to investigate the
Norwegianisation policy?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you aware that the Storting (the Norwegian parliament) has appointed
a special truth and reconciliation commission to investigate the
Norwegianisation policy that targeted Sami, Kven/Norwegian Finn, and
Forest Finn people?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
765 |
37.4% |
0.37390029 |
| 2 |
No |
1267 |
61.9% |
0.61925709 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.7% |
0.00684262 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtcr
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think that a truth and reconciliation commission
in Norway can contribute to reconciliation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think that a truth and reconciliation commission
in Norway can contribute to reconciliation between minority groups
(Sami, Kven/Norwegian Finn, and Forest Finn people) and the State?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
35 |
1.7% |
0.017106549 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
191 |
9.3% |
0.093352884 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
885 |
43.3% |
0.432551320 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
410 |
20.0% |
0.200391007 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
120 |
5.9% |
0.058651026 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
395 |
19.3% |
0.193059629 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004887586 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtcw
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think about when you hear or read the word “reconciliation”?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about when you hear or read the word “reconciliation”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing that comes to mind. All types of
responses are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few
words if you prefer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvtcn_1
|
Variable label:
|
How familiar do you think most people are with the Norwegianisation
policy in respect of the following groups: Sami people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How familiar do you think most people are with the State’s active
Norwegianisation policy in respect of the following groups that was
pursued up until the 1960s?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sami people
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very familiar |
121 |
5.9% |
0.059139785 |
| 2 |
Familiar |
545 |
26.6% |
0.266373412 |
| 3 |
Not very familiar |
917 |
44.8% |
0.448191593 |
| 4 |
Not at all familiar |
228 |
11.1% |
0.111436950 |
| 5 |
Do not know |
218 |
10.7% |
0.106549365 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.8% |
0.008308895 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtcn_2
|
Variable label:
|
How familiar do you think most people are with the Norwegianisation
policy in respect of the following groups: Kven/Norwegian Finns
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How familiar do you think most people are with the State’s active
Norwegianisation policy in respect of the following groups that was
pursued up until the 1960s?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Kven/Norwegian Finns
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very familiar |
36 |
1.8% |
0.01759531 |
| 2 |
Familiar |
136 |
6.6% |
0.06647116 |
| 3 |
Not very familiar |
870 |
42.5% |
0.42521994 |
| 4 |
Not at all familiar |
703 |
34.4% |
0.34359726 |
| 5 |
Do not know |
278 |
13.6% |
0.13587488 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.1% |
0.01124145 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtcn_3
|
Variable label:
|
How familiar do you think most people are with the Norwegianisation
policy in respect of the following groups: Forest Finns
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How familiar do you think most people are with the State’s active
Norwegianisation policy in respect of the following groups that was
pursued up until the 1960s?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Forest Finns
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very familiar |
32 |
1.6% |
0.01564027 |
| 2 |
Familiar |
89 |
4.3% |
0.04349951 |
| 3 |
Not very familiar |
749 |
36.6% |
0.36608016 |
| 4 |
Not at all familiar |
846 |
41.3% |
0.41348974 |
| 5 |
Do not know |
306 |
15.0% |
0.14956012 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.2% |
0.01173021 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtcs
|
Variable label:
|
How familiar are you with the fact that the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee has organised a series of open meetings about Norwegianisation
policy?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How familiar are you with the fact that the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee has organised a series of open meetings to which they have
invited people to tell their personal stories about Norwegianisation
policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very familiar |
23 |
1.1% |
0.011241447 |
| 2 |
Familiar |
91 |
4.4% |
0.044477028 |
| 3 |
Not very familiar |
497 |
24.3% |
0.242913001 |
| 4 |
Not at all familiar |
628 |
30.7% |
0.306940371 |
| 5 |
Do not know |
127 |
6.2% |
0.062072336 |
| 6 |
I do not know about the Committee |
664 |
32.5% |
0.324535679 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.8% |
0.007820137 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtcm_1
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media: TV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media:
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_dvtck != 2 | r24_dvtcs != 6) & r24_group = 2]
[The question was intented exposed to respondents where [r24_dvtck] != 2
or [r24_dvtcs] != 6. Due to a technical error no respondents were
exposed to the question.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:97-*]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 2 |
No |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 3 |
Do not know |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1399 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8761 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtcm_2
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media: Radio
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Radio
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_dvtck != 2 | r24_dvtcs != 6) & r24_group = 2]
[The question was intented exposed to respondents where [r24_dvtck] != 2
or [r24_dvtcs] != 6. Due to a technical error no respondents were
exposed to the question.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:97-*]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 2 |
No |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 3 |
Do not know |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1399 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8761 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtcm_3
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media: National newspapers (paper newspapers
and online newspapers)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media:
|
|
Literal question:
|
National newspapers (paper newspapers and online newspapers)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_dvtck != 2 | r24_dvtcs != 6) & r24_group = 2]
[The question was intented exposed to respondents where [r24_dvtck] != 2
or [r24_dvtcs] != 6. Due to a technical error no respondents were
exposed to the question.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:97-*]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 2 |
No |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 3 |
Do not know |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1399 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8761 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtcm_4
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media: Local newspapers (paper newspapers and
online newspapers)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Local newspapers (paper newspapers and online newspapers)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_dvtck != 2 | r24_dvtcs != 6) & r24_group = 2]
[The question was intented exposed to respondents where [r24_dvtck] != 2
or [r24_dvtcs] != 6. Due to a technical error no respondents were
exposed to the question.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:97-*]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 2 |
No |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 3 |
Do not know |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1399 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8761 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtcm_5
|
Variable label:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media: Social media (Facebook, Twitter,
Instagram, etc.)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation
Committee in the following media:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_dvtck != 2 | r24_dvtcs != 6) & r24_group = 2]
[The question was intented exposed to respondents where [r24_dvtck] != 2
or [r24_dvtcs] != 6. Due to a technical error no respondents were
exposed to the question.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:97-*]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 2 |
No |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 3 |
Do not know |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1399 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8761 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtcp
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norwegians have a role to play in contributing towards
reconciliation between minority groups and Norwegians
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
One of the main tasks of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is to
create reconciliation in Norway between (a) minority groups (Sami,
Kvens/Norwegian Finns and Forest Finns) and the state, and (b) between
these different minority groups and the majority population.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norwegians generally have a
personal role to play in contributing towards reconciliation between
these minority groups and Norwegians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
289 |
14.1% |
0.141251222 |
| 2 |
Agree |
642 |
31.4% |
0.313782991 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
462 |
22.6% |
0.225806452 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
441 |
21.6% |
0.215542522 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
81 |
4.0% |
0.039589443 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
73 |
3.6% |
0.035679374 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
42 |
2.1% |
0.020527859 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.8% |
0.007820137 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx_rangroup
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a group for the [r24_menewx]-experiment
based on weighted randomisation with a 90/10-allocation.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty)]
[Weighted randomization with a 90/10-allocation.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1957] [Invalid:8203]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selection 1 (90% probability) |
1762 |
90.0% |
0.90035769 |
| 2 |
Selection 2 (10% probability) |
195 |
10.0% |
0.09964231 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8203 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_tema1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a theme for the article in the first column
in [r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_tema2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat prices |
897 |
50.9% |
0.5090806 |
| 2 |
Extension of abortion to 22 weeks |
865 |
49.1% |
0.4909194 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_tema2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a theme for the article in the second
column in [r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_tema1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat prices |
865 |
49.1% |
0.4909194 |
| 2 |
Extension of abortion to 22 weeks |
897 |
50.9% |
0.5090806 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_overskrift1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
217 |
12.3% |
0.1231555 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
228 |
12.9% |
0.1293984 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
243 |
13.8% |
0.1379115 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
209 |
11.9% |
0.1186152 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
209 |
11.9% |
0.1186152 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
204 |
11.6% |
0.1157775 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
226 |
12.8% |
0.1282633 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
226 |
12.8% |
0.1282633 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_overskrift2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
205 |
11.6% |
0.1163451 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
220 |
12.5% |
0.1248581 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
225 |
12.8% |
0.1276958 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
215 |
12.2% |
0.1220204 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
214 |
12.1% |
0.1214529 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
241 |
13.7% |
0.1367764 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
223 |
12.7% |
0.1265607 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
219 |
12.4% |
0.1242906 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_vinkling1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the first
column in [r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_vinkling2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
895 |
50.8% |
0.5079455 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
867 |
49.2% |
0.4920545 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_vinkling2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the second
column in [r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_vinkling1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
867 |
49.2% |
0.4920545 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
895 |
50.8% |
0.5079455 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_tid1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects time for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_tid2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes ago |
922 |
52.3% |
0.523269 |
| 2 |
5 days ago |
840 |
47.7% |
0.476731 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_tid2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects time for textpiping in the second column in
[r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_tid1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes ago |
840 |
47.7% |
0.476731 |
| 2 |
5 days ago |
922 |
52.3% |
0.523269 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_populaer1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects popularity for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_populaer2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
One of the most widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
861 |
48.9% |
0.4886493 |
| 2 |
One of the least widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
901 |
51.1% |
0.5113507 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_populaer2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects popularity for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_populaer1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
One of the most widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
901 |
51.1% |
0.5113507 |
| 2 |
One of the least widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
861 |
48.9% |
0.4886493 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_perspop1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the article is widely read within
the respondents demography or not for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_perspop2]][The respondents gender,
age, and region is textpiped into the questiontext]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Match: “This article is widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age group
living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
890 |
50.5% |
0.5051078 |
| 2 |
No match: “This article is not widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age
group living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
872 |
49.5% |
0.4948922 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_perspop2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the article is widely read within
the respondents demography or not for textpiping in the second column in
[r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_perspop1]][The respondents gender,
age, and region is textpiped into the questiontext]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Match: “This article is widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age group
living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
872 |
49.5% |
0.4948922 |
| 2 |
No match: “This article is not widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age
group living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
890 |
50.5% |
0.5051078 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_sted1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects place for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_sted2]][If ‘close’ the respondent was
shown the name of its home municipality. If ‘distant’ the respondent was
shown a randomly selected municipality from a county different from the
respondents home county. The municipalities Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger,
Trondheim, and Tromsø isn’t selected. Municipalities from Viken will not
be selected if the respondent has Oslo as their home municipality.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Close |
854 |
48.5% |
0.4846765 |
| 2 |
Distant |
908 |
51.5% |
0.5153235 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_sted2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects place for textpiping in the second column
in [r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_sted1]][If ‘close’ the respondent was
shown the name of its home municipality. If ‘distant’ the respondent was
shown a randomly selected municipality from a county different from the
respondents home county. The municipalities Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger,
Trondheim, and Tromsø isn’t selected. Municipalities from Viken will not
be selected if the respondent has Oslo as their home municipality.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Close |
908 |
51.5% |
0.5153235 |
| 2 |
Distant |
854 |
48.5% |
0.4846765 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_lang1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects length for textpiping in the first column
in [r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_lang2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes |
880 |
49.9% |
0.4994325 |
| 2 |
15 minutes |
882 |
50.1% |
0.5005675 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_lang2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects length for textpiping in the second column
in [r24_menewx1a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1a_lang1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes |
882 |
50.1% |
0.5005675 |
| 2 |
15 minutes |
880 |
49.9% |
0.4994325 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_rangering1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects element for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1a1]. Selection conditional on answers given in [r24_meira]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Set based on rank given in [r24_meira]][The article on meat prices is
selected if theme ‘climate change’ is ranked higher than ‘abortion
legislation’ in [r24_meira]. The article on abortion legislation is
selected if the theme ‘abortion legislation’ is ranked higher than
‘climate change’ in [r24_meira]. If [r24_meira] is unanswered the
initial random sorting of [r24_meira] is used.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
You have previously indicated that you are interested in knowing more about the
subject of the article. The article has therefore been suggested to you, based
on your ranking of the topic. |
896 |
50.9% |
0.5085131 |
| 2 |
You have previously indicated that you are less interested in knowing more about
the subject of the article. The article has therefore not been suggested to you,
based on your ranking of the topic. |
866 |
49.1% |
0.4914869 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a_rangering2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects element for textpiping in the second column in
[r24_menewx1a1]. Selection conditional on answers given in [r24_meira]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Set based on rank given in [r24_meira]][The article on meat prices is
selected if theme ‘climate change’ is ranked higher than ‘abortion
legislation’ in [r24_meira]. The article on abortion legislation is
selected if the theme ‘abortion legislation’ is ranked higher than
‘climate change’ in [r24_meira]. If [r24_meira] is unanswered the
initial random sorting of [r24_meira] is used.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
You have previously indicated that you are interested in knowing more about the
subject of the article. The article has therefore been suggested to you, based
on your ranking of the topic. |
866 |
49.1% |
0.4914869 |
| 2 |
You have previously indicated that you are less interested in knowing more about
the subject of the article. The article has therefore not been suggested to you,
based on your ranking of the topic. |
896 |
50.9% |
0.5085131 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Recommendation algorithms effect on news choices.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The table below shows the headline of two genuine news stories which
have been published in Norwegian online newspapers (e.g. NRK, TV2, VG,
and Nettavisen).
Please read all the information in the table and consider the
question below.
Story 1
[r24_menewx1a_overskrift1]
[r24_menewx1a_tid1]
[r24_menewx1a_populaer1]
[r24_menewx1a_perspop1]
[r24_menewx1a_sted1]
[r24_menewx1a_tid1]
[r24_menewx1a_rangering1]
Story 2
[r24_menewx1a_overskrift2]
[r24_menewx1a_tid2]
[r24_menewx1a_populaer2]
[r24_menewx1a_perspop2]
[r24_menewx1a_sted2]
[r24_menewx1a_tid2]
[r24_menewx1a_rangering2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these two stories are you most likely to click on to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[The contents of the table was listed in the order set in
[r24_menewx1_roworder]][Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx1a2], and
[r24_menewx1a3]][The experiment was repeated four times (a, b, c, d)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
News story 1 |
892 |
50.6% |
0.50624291 |
| 2 |
News story 2 |
815 |
46.3% |
0.46254257 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
3.1% |
0.03121453 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a2
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 1 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 1 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx1a1], and [r24_menewx1a3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
106 |
6.0% |
0.06015891 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
382 |
21.7% |
0.21679909 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
571 |
32.4% |
0.32406356 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
521 |
29.6% |
0.29568672 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
153 |
8.7% |
0.08683314 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.6% |
0.01645857 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1a3
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 2 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 2 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx1a1], and [r24_menewx1a2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
128 |
7.3% |
0.07264472 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
356 |
20.2% |
0.20204313 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
571 |
32.4% |
0.32406356 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
490 |
27.8% |
0.27809308 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
192 |
10.9% |
0.10896708 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.4% |
0.01418842 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_tema1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a theme for the article in the first column
in [r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_tema2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat prices |
876 |
49.9% |
0.4994299 |
| 2 |
Extension of abortion to 22 weeks |
878 |
50.1% |
0.5005701 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_tema2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a theme for the article in the second
column in [r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_tema1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat prices |
878 |
50.1% |
0.5005701 |
| 2 |
Extension of abortion to 22 weeks |
876 |
49.9% |
0.4994299 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_overskrift1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
225 |
12.8% |
0.1282782 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
229 |
13.1% |
0.1305587 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
212 |
12.1% |
0.1208666 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
210 |
12.0% |
0.1197263 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
205 |
11.7% |
0.1168757 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
227 |
12.9% |
0.1294185 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
231 |
13.2% |
0.1316990 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
215 |
12.3% |
0.1225770 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_overskrift2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
208 |
11.9% |
0.1185861 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
217 |
12.4% |
0.1237172 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
234 |
13.3% |
0.1334094 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
219 |
12.5% |
0.1248575 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
225 |
12.8% |
0.1282782 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
208 |
11.9% |
0.1185861 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
214 |
12.2% |
0.1220068 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
229 |
13.1% |
0.1305587 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_vinkling1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the first
column in [r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_vinkling2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
873 |
49.8% |
0.4977195 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
881 |
50.2% |
0.5022805 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_vinkling2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the second
column in [r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_vinkling1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
881 |
50.2% |
0.5022805 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
873 |
49.8% |
0.4977195 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_tid1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects time for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_tid2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes ago |
856 |
48.8% |
0.4880274 |
| 2 |
5 days ago |
898 |
51.2% |
0.5119726 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_tid2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects time for textpiping in the second column in
[r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_tid1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes ago |
898 |
51.2% |
0.5119726 |
| 2 |
5 days ago |
856 |
48.8% |
0.4880274 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_populaer1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects popularity for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_populaer2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
One of the most widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
871 |
49.7% |
0.4965792 |
| 2 |
One of the least widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
883 |
50.3% |
0.5034208 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_populaer2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects popularity for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_populaer1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
One of the most widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
883 |
50.3% |
0.5034208 |
| 2 |
One of the least widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
871 |
49.7% |
0.4965792 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_perspop1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the article is widely read within
the respondents demography or not for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_perspop2]][The respondents gender,
age, and region is textpiped into the questiontext]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Match: “This article is widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age group
living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
847 |
48.3% |
0.4828962 |
| 2 |
No match: “This article is not widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age
group living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
907 |
51.7% |
0.5171038 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_perspop2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the article is widely read within
the respondents demography or not for textpiping in the second column in
[r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_perspop1]][The respondents gender,
age, and region is textpiped into the questiontext]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Match: “This article is widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age group
living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
907 |
51.7% |
0.5171038 |
| 2 |
No match: “This article is not widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age
group living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
847 |
48.3% |
0.4828962 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_sted1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects place for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_sted2]][If ‘close’ the respondent was
shown the name of its home municipality. If ‘distant’ the respondent was
shown a randomly selected municipality from a county different from the
respondents home county. The municipalities Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger,
Trondheim, and Tromsø isn’t selected. Municipalities from Viken will not
be selected if the respondent has Oslo as their home municipality.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Close |
891 |
50.8% |
0.5079818 |
| 2 |
Distant |
863 |
49.2% |
0.4920182 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_sted2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects place for textpiping in the second column
in [r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_sted1]][If ‘close’ the respondent was
shown the name of its home municipality. If ‘distant’ the respondent was
shown a randomly selected municipality from a county different from the
respondents home county. The municipalities Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger,
Trondheim, and Tromsø isn’t selected. Municipalities from Viken will not
be selected if the respondent has Oslo as their home municipality.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Close |
863 |
49.2% |
0.4920182 |
| 2 |
Distant |
891 |
50.8% |
0.5079818 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_lang1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects length for textpiping in the first column
in [r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_lang2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes |
860 |
49.0% |
0.4903079 |
| 2 |
15 minutes |
894 |
51.0% |
0.5096921 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_lang2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects length for textpiping in the second column
in [r24_menewx1b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1b_lang1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes |
894 |
51.0% |
0.5096921 |
| 2 |
15 minutes |
860 |
49.0% |
0.4903079 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_rangering1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects element for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1b1]. Selection conditional on answers given in [r24_meira]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Set based on rank given in [r24_meira]][The article on meat prices is
selected if theme ‘climate change’ is ranked higher than ‘abortion
legislation’ in [r24_meira]. The article on abortion legislation is
selected if the theme ‘abortion legislation’ is ranked higher than
‘climate change’ in [r24_meira]. If [r24_meira] is unanswered the
initial random sorting of [r24_meira] is used.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
You have previously indicated that you are interested in knowing more about the
subject of the article. The article has therefore been suggested to you, based
on your ranking of the topic. |
876 |
49.9% |
0.4994299 |
| 2 |
You have previously indicated that you are less interested in knowing more about
the subject of the article. The article has therefore not been suggested to you,
based on your ranking of the topic. |
878 |
50.1% |
0.5005701 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b_rangering2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects element for textpiping in the second column in
[r24_menewx1b1]. Selection conditional on answers given in [r24_meira]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Set based on rank given in [r24_meira]][The article on meat prices is
selected if theme ‘climate change’ is ranked higher than ‘abortion
legislation’ in [r24_meira]. The article on abortion legislation is
selected if the theme ‘abortion legislation’ is ranked higher than
‘climate change’ in [r24_meira]. If [r24_meira] is unanswered the
initial random sorting of [r24_meira] is used.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1754] [Invalid:8406]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
You have previously indicated that you are interested in knowing more about the
subject of the article. The article has therefore been suggested to you, based
on your ranking of the topic. |
878 |
50.1% |
0.5005701 |
| 2 |
You have previously indicated that you are less interested in knowing more about
the subject of the article. The article has therefore not been suggested to you,
based on your ranking of the topic. |
876 |
49.9% |
0.4994299 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8406 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Recommendation algorithms effect on news choices.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The table below shows the headline of two genuine news stories which
have been published in Norwegian online newspapers (e.g. NRK, TV2, VG,
and Nettavisen).
Please read all the information in the table and consider the
question below.
Story 1
[r24_menewx1b_overskrift1]
[r24_menewx1b_tid1]
[r24_menewx1b_populaer1]
[r24_menewx1b_perspop1]
[r24_menewx1b_sted1]
[r24_menewx1b_tid1]
[r24_menewx1b_rangering1]
Story 2
[r24_menewx1b_overskrift2]
[r24_menewx1b_tid2]
[r24_menewx1b_populaer2]
[r24_menewx1b_perspop2]
[r24_menewx1b_sted2]
[r24_menewx1b_tid2]
[r24_menewx1b_rangering2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these two stories are you most likely to click on to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[The contents of the table was listed in the order set in
[r24_menewx1_roworder]][Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx1b2], and
[r24_menewx1b3]][The experiment was repeated four times (a, b, c, d)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
News story 1 |
867 |
49.2% |
0.49205448 |
| 2 |
News story 2 |
824 |
46.8% |
0.46765040 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
4.0% |
0.04029512 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b2
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 1 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 1 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx1b1], and [r24_menewx1b3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
114 |
6.5% |
0.06469921 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
343 |
19.5% |
0.19466515 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
605 |
34.3% |
0.34335982 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
512 |
29.1% |
0.29057889 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
144 |
8.2% |
0.08172531 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.5% |
0.02497162 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1b3
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 2 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 2 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx1b1], and [r24_menewx1b2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
118 |
6.7% |
0.06696935 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
392 |
22.2% |
0.22247446 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
575 |
32.6% |
0.32633371 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
477 |
27.1% |
0.27071510 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
156 |
8.9% |
0.08853575 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.5% |
0.02497162 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_tema1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a theme for the article in the first column
in [r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_tema2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat prices |
868 |
49.7% |
0.4968517 |
| 2 |
Extension of abortion to 22 weeks |
879 |
50.3% |
0.5031483 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_tema2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a theme for the article in the second
column in [r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_tema1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat prices |
879 |
50.3% |
0.5031483 |
| 2 |
Extension of abortion to 22 weeks |
868 |
49.7% |
0.4968517 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_overskrift1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
223 |
12.8% |
0.1276474 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
214 |
12.2% |
0.1224957 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
215 |
12.3% |
0.1230681 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
216 |
12.4% |
0.1236405 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
209 |
12.0% |
0.1196337 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
235 |
13.5% |
0.1345163 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
227 |
13.0% |
0.1299370 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
208 |
11.9% |
0.1190612 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_overskrift2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
217 |
12.4% |
0.1242129 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
215 |
12.3% |
0.1230681 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
226 |
12.9% |
0.1293646 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
221 |
12.7% |
0.1265026 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
218 |
12.5% |
0.1247853 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
216 |
12.4% |
0.1236405 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
212 |
12.1% |
0.1213509 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
222 |
12.7% |
0.1270750 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_vinkling1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the first
column in [r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_vinkling2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
874 |
50.0% |
0.5002862 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
873 |
50.0% |
0.4997138 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_vinkling2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the second
column in [r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_vinkling1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
873 |
50.0% |
0.4997138 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
874 |
50.0% |
0.5002862 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_tid1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects time for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_tid2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes ago |
859 |
49.2% |
0.4917001 |
| 2 |
5 days ago |
888 |
50.8% |
0.5082999 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_tid2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects time for textpiping in the second column in
[r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_tid1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes ago |
888 |
50.8% |
0.5082999 |
| 2 |
5 days ago |
859 |
49.2% |
0.4917001 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_populaer1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects popularity for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_populaer2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
One of the most widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
880 |
50.4% |
0.5037207 |
| 2 |
One of the least widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
867 |
49.6% |
0.4962793 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_populaer2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects popularity for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_populaer1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
One of the most widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
867 |
49.6% |
0.4962793 |
| 2 |
One of the least widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
880 |
50.4% |
0.5037207 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_perspop1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the article is widely read within
the respondents demography or not for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_perspop2]][The respondents gender,
age, and region is textpiped into the questiontext]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Match: “This article is widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age group
living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
865 |
49.5% |
0.4951345 |
| 2 |
No match: “This article is not widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age
group living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
882 |
50.5% |
0.5048655 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_perspop2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the article is widely read within
the respondents demography or not for textpiping in the second column in
[r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_perspop1]][The respondents gender,
age, and region is textpiped into the questiontext]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Match: “This article is widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age group
living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
882 |
50.5% |
0.5048655 |
| 2 |
No match: “This article is not widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age
group living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
865 |
49.5% |
0.4951345 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_sted1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects place for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_sted2]][If ‘close’ the respondent was
shown the name of its home municipality. If ‘distant’ the respondent was
shown a randomly selected municipality from a county different from the
respondents home county. The municipalities Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger,
Trondheim, and Tromsø isn’t selected. Municipalities from Viken will not
be selected if the respondent has Oslo as their home municipality.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Close |
901 |
51.6% |
0.5157413 |
| 2 |
Distant |
846 |
48.4% |
0.4842587 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_sted2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects place for textpiping in the second column
in [r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_sted1]][If ‘close’ the respondent was
shown the name of its home municipality. If ‘distant’ the respondent was
shown a randomly selected municipality from a county different from the
respondents home county. The municipalities Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger,
Trondheim, and Tromsø isn’t selected. Municipalities from Viken will not
be selected if the respondent has Oslo as their home municipality.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Close |
846 |
48.4% |
0.4842587 |
| 2 |
Distant |
901 |
51.6% |
0.5157413 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_lang1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects length for textpiping in the first column
in [r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_lang2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes |
873 |
50.0% |
0.4997138 |
| 2 |
15 minutes |
874 |
50.0% |
0.5002862 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_lang2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects length for textpiping in the second column
in [r24_menewx1c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1c_lang1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes |
874 |
50.0% |
0.5002862 |
| 2 |
15 minutes |
873 |
50.0% |
0.4997138 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_rangering1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects element for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1c1]. Selection conditional on answers given in [r24_meira]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Set based on rank given in [r24_meira]][The article on meat prices is
selected if theme ‘climate change’ is ranked higher than ‘abortion
legislation’ in [r24_meira]. The article on abortion legislation is
selected if the theme ‘abortion legislation’ is ranked higher than
‘climate change’ in [r24_meira]. If [r24_meira] is unanswered the
initial random sorting of [r24_meira] is used.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
You have previously indicated that you are interested in knowing more about the
subject of the article. The article has therefore been suggested to you, based
on your ranking of the topic. |
875 |
50.1% |
0.5008586 |
| 2 |
You have previously indicated that you are less interested in knowing more about
the subject of the article. The article has therefore not been suggested to you,
based on your ranking of the topic. |
872 |
49.9% |
0.4991414 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c_rangering2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects element for textpiping in the second column in
[r24_menewx1c1]. Selection conditional on answers given in [r24_meira]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Set based on rank given in [r24_meira]][The article on meat prices is
selected if theme ‘climate change’ is ranked higher than ‘abortion
legislation’ in [r24_meira]. The article on abortion legislation is
selected if the theme ‘abortion legislation’ is ranked higher than
‘climate change’ in [r24_meira]. If [r24_meira] is unanswered the
initial random sorting of [r24_meira] is used.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1747] [Invalid:8413]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
You have previously indicated that you are interested in knowing more about the
subject of the article. The article has therefore been suggested to you, based
on your ranking of the topic. |
872 |
49.9% |
0.4991414 |
| 2 |
You have previously indicated that you are less interested in knowing more about
the subject of the article. The article has therefore not been suggested to you,
based on your ranking of the topic. |
875 |
50.1% |
0.5008586 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8413 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Recommendation algorithms effect on news choices.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The table below shows the headline of two genuine news stories which
have been published in Norwegian online newspapers (e.g. NRK, TV2, VG,
and Nettavisen).
Please read all the information in the table and consider the
question below.
Story 1
[r24_menewx1c_overskrift1]
[r24_menewx1c_tid1]
[r24_menewx1c_populaer1]
[r24_menewx1c_perspop1]
[r24_menewx1c_sted1]
[r24_menewx1c_tid1]
[r24_menewx1c_rangering1]
Story 2
[r24_menewx1c_overskrift2]
[r24_menewx1c_tid2]
[r24_menewx1c_populaer2]
[r24_menewx1c_perspop2]
[r24_menewx1c_sted2]
[r24_menewx1c_tid2]
[r24_menewx1c_rangering2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these two stories are you most likely to click on to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[The contents of the table was listed in the order set in
[r24_menewx1_roworder]][Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx1c2], and
[r24_menewx1c3]][The experiment was repeated four times (a, b, c, d)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
News story 1 |
863 |
49.0% |
0.48978434 |
| 2 |
News story 2 |
798 |
45.3% |
0.45289444 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
101 |
5.7% |
0.05732123 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c2
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 1 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 1 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx1c1], and [r24_menewx1c3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
108 |
6.1% |
0.06129398 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
344 |
19.5% |
0.19523269 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
573 |
32.5% |
0.32519864 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
505 |
28.7% |
0.28660613 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
155 |
8.8% |
0.08796822 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
77 |
4.4% |
0.04370034 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1c3
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 2 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 2 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx1c1], and [r24_menewx1c2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
126 |
7.2% |
0.07150965 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
396 |
22.5% |
0.22474461 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
551 |
31.3% |
0.31271283 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
490 |
27.8% |
0.27809308 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
124 |
7.0% |
0.07037457 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
4.3% |
0.04256527 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_tema1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a theme for the article in the first column
in [r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_tema2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat prices |
847 |
48.6% |
0.4859438 |
| 2 |
Extension of abortion to 22 weeks |
896 |
51.4% |
0.5140562 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_tema2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a theme for the article in the second
column in [r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_tema1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat prices |
896 |
51.4% |
0.5140562 |
| 2 |
Extension of abortion to 22 weeks |
847 |
48.6% |
0.4859438 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_overskrift1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
222 |
12.7% |
0.1273666 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
196 |
11.2% |
0.1124498 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
232 |
13.3% |
0.1331038 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
197 |
11.3% |
0.1130235 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
198 |
11.4% |
0.1135972 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
266 |
15.3% |
0.1526104 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
223 |
12.8% |
0.1279403 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
209 |
12.0% |
0.1199082 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_overskrift2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
218 |
12.5% |
0.1250717 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
224 |
12.9% |
0.1285141 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
257 |
14.7% |
0.1474469 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
197 |
11.3% |
0.1130235 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
198 |
11.4% |
0.1135972 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
218 |
12.5% |
0.1250717 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
195 |
11.2% |
0.1118761 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
236 |
13.5% |
0.1353987 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_vinkling1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the first
column in [r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_vinkling2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
875 |
50.2% |
0.502008 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
868 |
49.8% |
0.497992 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_vinkling2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the second
column in [r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_vinkling1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
868 |
49.8% |
0.497992 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
875 |
50.2% |
0.502008 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_tid1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects time for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_tid2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes ago |
896 |
51.4% |
0.5140562 |
| 2 |
5 days ago |
847 |
48.6% |
0.4859438 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_tid2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects time for textpiping in the second column in
[r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_tid1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes ago |
847 |
48.6% |
0.4859438 |
| 2 |
5 days ago |
896 |
51.4% |
0.5140562 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_populaer1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects popularity for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_populaer2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
One of the most widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
894 |
51.3% |
0.5129088 |
| 2 |
One of the least widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
849 |
48.7% |
0.4870912 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_populaer2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects popularity for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_populaer1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
One of the most widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
849 |
48.7% |
0.4870912 |
| 2 |
One of the least widely read cases on the front pages right now. |
894 |
51.3% |
0.5129088 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_perspop1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the article is widely read within
the respondents demography or not for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_perspop2]][The respondents gender,
age, and region is textpiped into the questiontext]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Match: “This article is widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age group
living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
854 |
49.0% |
0.4899598 |
| 2 |
No match: “This article is not widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age
group living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
889 |
51.0% |
0.5100402 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_perspop2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the article is widely read within
the respondents demography or not for textpiping in the second column in
[r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_perspop1]][The respondents gender,
age, and region is textpiped into the questiontext]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Match: “This article is widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age group
living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
889 |
51.0% |
0.5100402 |
| 2 |
No match: “This article is not widely read among [gender] in the [age group] age
group living [in Region], and is therefore suggested for people like you.” |
854 |
49.0% |
0.4899598 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_sted1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects place for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_sted2]][If ‘close’ the respondent was
shown the name of its home municipality. If ‘distant’ the respondent was
shown a randomly selected municipality from a county different from the
respondents home county. The municipalities Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger,
Trondheim, and Tromsø isn’t selected. Municipalities from Viken will not
be selected if the respondent has Oslo as their home municipality.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Close |
870 |
49.9% |
0.4991394 |
| 2 |
Distant |
873 |
50.1% |
0.5008606 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_sted2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects place for textpiping in the second column
in [r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_sted1]][If ‘close’ the respondent was
shown the name of its home municipality. If ‘distant’ the respondent was
shown a randomly selected municipality from a county different from the
respondents home county. The municipalities Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger,
Trondheim, and Tromsø isn’t selected. Municipalities from Viken will not
be selected if the respondent has Oslo as their home municipality.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Close |
873 |
50.1% |
0.5008606 |
| 2 |
Distant |
870 |
49.9% |
0.4991394 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_lang1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects length for textpiping in the first column
in [r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_lang2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes |
871 |
50.0% |
0.4997131 |
| 2 |
15 minutes |
872 |
50.0% |
0.5002869 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_lang2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects length for textpiping in the second column
in [r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx1d_lang1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
2 minutes |
872 |
50.0% |
0.5002869 |
| 2 |
15 minutes |
871 |
50.0% |
0.4997131 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_rangering1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects element for textpiping in the first column in
[r24_menewx1d1]. Selection conditional on answers given in [r24_meira]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Set based on rank given in [r24_meira]][The article on meat prices is
selected if theme ‘climate change’ is ranked higher than ‘abortion
legislation’ in [r24_meira]. The article on abortion legislation is
selected if the theme ‘abortion legislation’ is ranked higher than
‘climate change’ in [r24_meira]. If [r24_meira] is unanswered the
initial random sorting of [r24_meira] is used.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
You have previously indicated that you are interested in knowing more about the
subject of the article. The article has therefore been suggested to you, based
on your ranking of the topic. |
874 |
50.1% |
0.5014343 |
| 2 |
You have previously indicated that you are less interested in knowing more about
the subject of the article. The article has therefore not been suggested to you,
based on your ranking of the topic. |
869 |
49.9% |
0.4985657 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d_rangering2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects element for textpiping in the second column in
[r24_menewx1d1]. Selection conditional on answers given in [r24_meira]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Set based on rank given in [r24_meira]][The article on meat prices is
selected if theme ‘climate change’ is ranked higher than ‘abortion
legislation’ in [r24_meira]. The article on abortion legislation is
selected if the theme ‘abortion legislation’ is ranked higher than
‘climate change’ in [r24_meira]. If [r24_meira] is unanswered the
initial random sorting of [r24_meira] is used.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1743] [Invalid:8417]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
You have previously indicated that you are interested in knowing more about the
subject of the article. The article has therefore been suggested to you, based
on your ranking of the topic. |
869 |
49.9% |
0.4985657 |
| 2 |
You have previously indicated that you are less interested in knowing more about
the subject of the article. The article has therefore not been suggested to you,
based on your ranking of the topic. |
874 |
50.1% |
0.5014343 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8417 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Recommendation algorithms effect on news choices.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The table below shows the headline of two genuine news stories which
have been published in Norwegian online newspapers (e.g. NRK, TV2, VG,
and Nettavisen).
Please read all the information in the table and consider the
question below.
Story 1
[r24_menewx1d_overskrift1]
[r24_menewx1d_tid1]
[r24_menewx1d_populaer1]
[r24_menewx1d_perspop1]
[r24_menewx1d_sted1]
[r24_menewx1d_tid1]
[r24_menewx1d_rangering1]
Story 2
[r24_menewx1d_overskrift2]
[r24_menewx1d_tid2]
[r24_menewx1d_populaer2]
[r24_menewx1d_perspop2]
[r24_menewx1d_sted2]
[r24_menewx1d_tid2]
[r24_menewx1d_rangering2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these two stories are you most likely to click on to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[The contents of the table was listed in the order set in
[r24_menewx1_roworder]][Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx1d2], and
[r24_menewx1d3]][The experiment was repeated four times (a, b, c, d)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
News story 1 |
867 |
49.2% |
0.49205448 |
| 2 |
News story 2 |
764 |
43.4% |
0.43359818 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
131 |
7.4% |
0.07434733 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d2
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 1 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 1 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx1d1], and [r24_menewx1d3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
104 |
5.9% |
0.05902384 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
340 |
19.3% |
0.19296254 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
555 |
31.5% |
0.31498297 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
506 |
28.7% |
0.28717367 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
159 |
9.0% |
0.09023837 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
98 |
5.6% |
0.05561862 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1d3
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 2 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 2 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx1d1], and [r24_menewx1d2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
124 |
7.0% |
0.07037457 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
400 |
22.7% |
0.22701476 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
575 |
32.6% |
0.32633371 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
441 |
25.0% |
0.25028377 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
124 |
7.0% |
0.07037457 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
98 |
5.6% |
0.05561862 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2a_tema
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a theme for the article in [r24_menewx2a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat prices |
116 |
59.5% |
0.5948718 |
| 2 |
Extension of abortion to 22 weeks |
79 |
40.5% |
0.4051282 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2a_overskrift1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_menewx2a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09230769 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
38 |
19.5% |
0.19487179 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
23 |
11.8% |
0.11794872 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
37 |
19.0% |
0.18974359 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09230769 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
22 |
11.3% |
0.11282051 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
21 |
10.8% |
0.10769231 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09230769 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2a_overskrift2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_menewx2a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
44 |
22.6% |
0.22564103 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
21 |
10.8% |
0.10769231 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
31 |
15.9% |
0.15897436 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
20 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
24 |
12.3% |
0.12307692 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
21 |
10.8% |
0.10769231 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
16 |
8.2% |
0.08205128 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09230769 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2a_vinkling1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the first
column in [r24_menewx2a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx2a_vinkling2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
80 |
41.0% |
0.4102564 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
115 |
59.0% |
0.5897436 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2a_vinkling2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the second
column in [r24_menewx2a1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx2a_vinkling1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
115 |
59.0% |
0.5897436 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
80 |
41.0% |
0.4102564 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2a1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Recommendation algorithms effect on news choices.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The table below shows the headline of two genuine news stories which
have been published in Norwegian online newspapers (e.g. NRK, TV2, VG,
and Nettavisen).
Please read all the information in the table and consider the
question below.
Story 1
[r24_menewx2a_overskrift1]
Story 2
[r24_menewx2a_overskrift2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these two stories are you most likely to click on to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx2a2], and [r24_menewx2a3]][The
experiment was repeated four times (a, b, c, d)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
News story 1 |
96 |
49.2% |
0.49230769 |
| 2 |
News story 2 |
94 |
48.2% |
0.48205128 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2a2
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 1 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 1 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx2a1], and [r24_menewx2a3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
15 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
42 |
21.5% |
0.21538462 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
77 |
39.5% |
0.39487179 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
42 |
21.5% |
0.21538462 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
16 |
8.2% |
0.08205128 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01538462 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2a3
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 2 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 2 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx2a1], and [r24_menewx2a3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
16 |
8.2% |
0.08205128 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
38 |
19.5% |
0.19487179 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
65 |
33.3% |
0.33333333 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
56 |
28.7% |
0.28717949 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
17 |
8.7% |
0.08717949 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01538462 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2b_tema
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a theme for the article in [r24_menewx2b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat prices |
93 |
47.7% |
0.4769231 |
| 2 |
Extension of abortion to 22 weeks |
102 |
52.3% |
0.5230769 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2b_overskrift1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_menewx2b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
32 |
16.4% |
0.16410256 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
22 |
11.3% |
0.11282051 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
21 |
10.8% |
0.10769231 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09230769 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
25 |
12.8% |
0.12820513 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
23 |
11.8% |
0.11794872 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
27 |
13.8% |
0.13846154 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
27 |
13.8% |
0.13846154 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2b_overskrift2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_menewx2b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
15 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
35 |
17.9% |
0.17948718 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
25 |
12.8% |
0.12820513 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09230769 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
38 |
19.5% |
0.19487179 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
30 |
15.4% |
0.15384615 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
12 |
6.2% |
0.06153846 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
22 |
11.3% |
0.11282051 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2b_vinkling1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the first
column in [r24_menewx2b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx2b_vinkling2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
105 |
53.8% |
0.5384615 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
90 |
46.2% |
0.4615385 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2b_vinkling2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the second
column in [r24_menewx2b1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx2b_vinkling1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
90 |
46.2% |
0.4615385 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
105 |
53.8% |
0.5384615 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2b1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Recommendation algorithms effect on news choices.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The table below shows the headline of two genuine news stories which
have been published in Norwegian online newspapers (e.g. NRK, TV2, VG,
and Nettavisen).
Please read all the information in the table and consider the
question below.
Story 1
[r24_menewx2b_overskrift1]
Story 2
[r24_menewx2b_overskrift2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these two stories are you most likely to click on to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx2b2], and [r24_menewx2b3]][The
experiment was repeated four times (a, b, c, d)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
News story 1 |
90 |
46.2% |
0.46153846 |
| 2 |
News story 2 |
96 |
49.2% |
0.49230769 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
4.6% |
0.04615385 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2b2
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 1 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 1 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx2b1], and [r24_menewx2b3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
17 |
8.7% |
0.08717949 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
39 |
20.0% |
0.20000000 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
69 |
35.4% |
0.35384615 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
47 |
24.1% |
0.24102564 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
19 |
9.7% |
0.09743590 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
2.1% |
0.02051282 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2b3
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 2 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 2 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx2b1], and [r24_menewx2b3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
20 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
41 |
21.0% |
0.21025641 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
61 |
31.3% |
0.31282051 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
55 |
28.2% |
0.28205128 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
13 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2c_tema
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a theme for the article in [r24_menewx2c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat prices |
92 |
47.2% |
0.4717949 |
| 2 |
Extension of abortion to 22 weeks |
103 |
52.8% |
0.5282051 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2c_overskrift1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_menewx2c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
27 |
13.8% |
0.1384615 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
19 |
9.7% |
0.0974359 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
21 |
10.8% |
0.1076923 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
25 |
12.8% |
0.1282051 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
22 |
11.3% |
0.1128205 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
23 |
11.8% |
0.1179487 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
21 |
10.8% |
0.1076923 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
37 |
19.0% |
0.1897436 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2c_overskrift2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_menewx2c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
28 |
14.4% |
0.14358974 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
19 |
9.7% |
0.09743590 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
16 |
8.2% |
0.08205128 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
29 |
14.9% |
0.14871795 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
34 |
17.4% |
0.17435897 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
20 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
26 |
13.3% |
0.13333333 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
23 |
11.8% |
0.11794872 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2c_vinkling1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the first
column in [r24_menewx2c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx2c_vinkling2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
91 |
46.7% |
0.4666667 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
104 |
53.3% |
0.5333333 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2c_vinkling2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the second
column in [r24_menewx2c1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx2c_vinkling1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
104 |
53.3% |
0.5333333 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
91 |
46.7% |
0.4666667 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2c1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Recommendation algorithms effect on news choices.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The table below shows the headline of two genuine news stories which
have been published in Norwegian online newspapers (e.g. NRK, TV2, VG,
and Nettavisen).
Please read all the information in the table and consider the
question below.
Story 1
[r24_menewx2c_overskrift1]
Story 2
[r24_menewx2c_overskrift2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these two stories are you most likely to click on to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx2c2], and [r24_menewx2c3]][The
experiment was repeated four times (a, b, c, d)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
News story 1 |
90 |
46.2% |
0.46153846 |
| 2 |
News story 2 |
93 |
47.7% |
0.47692308 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
6.2% |
0.06153846 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2c2
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 1 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 1 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx2c1], and [r24_menewx2c3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
13 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
39 |
20.0% |
0.20000000 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
68 |
34.9% |
0.34871795 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
47 |
24.1% |
0.24102564 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
20 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
4.1% |
0.04102564 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2c3
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 2 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 2 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx2c1], and [r24_menewx2c3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
20 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
37 |
19.0% |
0.18974359 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
65 |
33.3% |
0.33333333 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
48 |
24.6% |
0.24615385 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
17 |
8.7% |
0.08717949 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
4.1% |
0.04102564 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2d_tema
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a theme for the article in [r24_menewx2d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat prices |
111 |
56.9% |
0.5692308 |
| 2 |
Extension of abortion to 22 weeks |
84 |
43.1% |
0.4307692 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2d_overskrift1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_menewx2d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
27 |
13.8% |
0.13846154 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
29 |
14.9% |
0.14871795 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
28 |
14.4% |
0.14358974 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
27 |
13.8% |
0.13846154 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
23 |
11.8% |
0.11794872 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
14 |
7.2% |
0.07179487 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09230769 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
29 |
14.9% |
0.14871795 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2d_overskrift2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a headline for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_menewx2d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Randomly selects article based on randomized subject and journalistic
angle]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Meat could become more expensive. Environment groups believe that imposing a
tax on red meat is one of the cheapest and most effective measures for reducing
Norwegian emissions. |
28 |
14.4% |
0.14358974 |
| 2 |
“Must be allowed to eat pizza with minced beef on Fridays.” Farmer thinks that
Norwegians should be able to eat pizza with beef on Fridays without being shamed
for eating meat. |
30 |
15.4% |
0.15384615 |
| 3 |
New calculation: this is how bad is meat is for the environment. According to
a new survey, we could reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture by 50% by growing
corn and vegetables instead of keeping animals. |
28 |
14.4% |
0.14358974 |
| 4 |
Thinks the world needs more food. “Reducing the production of meat in Norway
would not be compatible with the goal of increasing world food production,” says
the head of the Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives in Norway. |
25 |
12.8% |
0.12820513 |
| 5 |
Women's rights advocates want to extend self-determined abortion to week 22.
“We want to transfer power from the committees to women. The committee system is
outdated and has played out its role.” |
23 |
11.8% |
0.11794872 |
| 6 |
Critical of proposals for self-determined abortion by week 22. The Norwegian
Midwifery Federation says that more midwives will opt out if self-determined
abortion is extended to week 22. |
16 |
8.2% |
0.08205128 |
| 7 |
Had to have a late abortion in week 22. “It's so painful to read comments about
me being a child murderer when I lost a much-wanted child,” says Cecilie (31). |
20 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
| 8 |
Shocked by proposals for self-determined abortion in week 22: 'We gave our baby
a name in week 22,” says Ida (32). |
25 |
12.8% |
0.12820513 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2d_vinkling1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the first
column in [r24_menewx2d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx2d_vinkling2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
96 |
49.2% |
0.4923077 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
99 |
50.8% |
0.5076923 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2d_vinkling2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an angle for the article in the second
column in [r24_menewx2d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Opposite value from [r24_menewx2d_vinkling1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:195] [Invalid:9965]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In favour |
99 |
50.8% |
0.5076923 |
| 2 |
Opposed |
96 |
49.2% |
0.4923077 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2d1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Recommendation algorithms effect on news choices.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The table below shows the headline of two genuine news stories which
have been published in Norwegian online newspapers (e.g. NRK, TV2, VG,
and Nettavisen).
Please read all the information in the table and consider the
question below.
Story 1
[r24_menewx2d_overskrift1]
Story 2
[r24_menewx2d_overskrift2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these two stories are you most likely to click on to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx2d2], and [r24_menewx2d3]][The
experiment was repeated four times (a, b, c, d)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
News story 1 |
92 |
47.2% |
0.47179487 |
| 2 |
News story 2 |
89 |
45.6% |
0.45641026 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
7.2% |
0.07179487 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2d2
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 1 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 1 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx2d1], and [r24_menewx2d3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
17 |
8.7% |
0.08717949 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
37 |
19.0% |
0.18974359 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
58 |
29.7% |
0.29743590 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
58 |
29.7% |
0.29743590 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
13 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
6.2% |
0.06153846 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx2d3
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on Story 2 in order to read
more?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have clicked on
Story 2 in order to read more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 2]
[Posed on the same page as [r24_menewx2d1], and [r24_menewx2d3]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Not at all likely |
14 |
7.2% |
0.07179487 |
| 2 |
2 - Not very likely |
44 |
22.6% |
0.22564103 |
| 3 |
3 - Somewhat likely |
60 |
30.8% |
0.30769231 |
| 4 |
4 - Likely |
53 |
27.2% |
0.27179487 |
| 5 |
5 - Highly likely |
12 |
6.2% |
0.06153846 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
6.2% |
0.06153846 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9965 |
|
NA |
r24_menewx1_roworder
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Shows the random order of the attributes shown in the table
for [r24_menewx1a1], [r24_menewx1b1], [r24_menewx1c1], and
[r24_menewx1d1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r24_group = 3 and if the background variables are not
empty) & r24_menewx_rangroup = 1]
[“Headline of the article” (1) always appears on top.
2 = “The article was published:”;
3 = “The general popularity of the article:”;
4 = “The popularity of the article among people like you:”;
5 = “The article mentions the following place:”;
6 = “How long it takes to read the entire article:”;
7 = “Your ranking of the topic:”]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1762] [Invalid:8398]
[Range:-]
|
r24_dvlcix_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value for textpiping in [r24_dvlcix]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2066] [Invalid:8094]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
working people |
1029 |
49.8% |
0.4980639 |
| 2 |
migrant workers |
1037 |
50.2% |
0.5019361 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8094 |
|
NA |
r24_dvlcix_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value for textpiping in [r24_dvlcix]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2066] [Invalid:8094]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
full compensation |
1048 |
50.7% |
0.5072604 |
| 2 |
Social Security |
1018 |
49.3% |
0.4927396 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8094 |
|
NA |
r24_dvlcix
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: [r24_dvlcix_ran1] should get [r24_dvlcix_ran2] as long
as the long-term effects of the coronavirus prevent them from working as
usual.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some [r24_dvlcix_ran1] who caught Covid at work during the pandemic have
suffered long-term health problems, called “long Covid” in English. This
illness means that they are unable to continue working as usual. For
most people, this means a significant loss of income.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should get
[r24_dvlcix_ran2] as long as the long-term effects of the coronavirus
prevent them from working as usual?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
396 |
19.0% |
0.190293128 |
| 2 |
Agree |
745 |
35.8% |
0.358000961 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
394 |
18.9% |
0.189332052 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
265 |
12.7% |
0.127342624 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
134 |
6.4% |
0.064392119 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
85 |
4.1% |
0.040845747 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
42 |
2.0% |
0.020182605 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.0% |
0.009610764 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvlcsx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value for textpiping in [r24_dvlcsx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2065] [Invalid:8095]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
working people |
676 |
32.7% |
0.3273608 |
| 2 |
working people with immigrant backgrounds |
692 |
33.5% |
0.3351090 |
| 3 |
immigrants |
697 |
33.8% |
0.3375303 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8095 |
|
NA |
r24_dvlcsx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value for textpiping in [r24_dvlcsx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2065] [Invalid:8095]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Blank] |
685 |
33.2% |
0.3317191 |
| 2 |
even if they are not Norwegian citizens |
693 |
33.6% |
0.3355932 |
| 3 |
even if they did not have all the proper paperwork when they became ill |
687 |
33.3% |
0.3326877 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8095 |
|
NA |
r24_dvlcsx
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norwegian taxpayers should fund financial support
schemes for these working people until they are able to work full time
again[r24_dvlcsx_ran2]?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the pandemic, some [r24_dvlcsx_ran1] were more susceptible to
contagion than others, such as bus drivers, kindergarten employees and
health professionals. Some of them became ill and are unable to work
full time today due to the long-term effects of Covid.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norwegian taxpayers should
fund financial support schemes for these working people until they are
able to work full time again[r24_dvlcsx_ran2]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
399 |
19.2% |
0.19173474 |
| 2 |
Agree |
727 |
34.9% |
0.34935127 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
418 |
20.1% |
0.20086497 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
243 |
11.7% |
0.11677078 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
118 |
5.7% |
0.05670351 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
87 |
4.2% |
0.04180682 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
64 |
3.1% |
0.03075444 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.2% |
0.01201346 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvrdgx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r24_dvrdgx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2065] [Invalid:8095]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Islamic beliefs and traditions |
344 |
16.7% |
0.1665860 |
| 2 |
conservative Islamic beliefs and traditions |
356 |
17.2% |
0.1723971 |
| 3 |
conservative beliefs and traditions |
336 |
16.3% |
0.1627119 |
| 4 |
conservative Christian beliefs and traditions |
362 |
17.5% |
0.1753027 |
| 5 |
conservative ideas in Islamic beliefs and traditions that emphasise the
differences between boys and girls |
314 |
15.2% |
0.1520581 |
| 6 |
conservative ideas in Christian beliefs and traditions that emphasise the
differences between boys and girls |
353 |
17.1% |
0.1709443 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8095 |
|
NA |
r24_dvrdgx
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Parents in Norway who want to raise their children in
line with [r24_dvrdgx_ran] should be respected.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Parents in Norway who want to raise their children in line with
[r24_dvrdgx_ran] should be respected.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
87 |
4.2% |
0.041806824 |
| 2 |
Agree |
309 |
14.8% |
0.148486305 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
359 |
17.3% |
0.172513215 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
310 |
14.9% |
0.148966843 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
336 |
16.1% |
0.161460836 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
330 |
15.9% |
0.158577607 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
330 |
15.9% |
0.158577607 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.0% |
0.009610764 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvshax_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r24_dvshax]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2065] [Invalid:8095]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Muslim women, however, refused to shake hands with politicians who were men |
1020 |
49.4% |
0.4939467 |
| 2 |
Muslim men, however, refused to shake hands with politicians who were women |
1045 |
50.6% |
0.5060533 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8095 |
|
NA |
r24_dvshax_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r24_dvshax]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2065] [Invalid:8095]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Blank] |
1063 |
51.5% |
0.51477 |
| 2 |
Instead, they placed their hand on their heart to say hello. |
1002 |
48.5% |
0.48523 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8095 |
|
NA |
r24_dvshax
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: local politicians requested that all the attendees
should shake hands the next time.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The next question is about how people greet each other. When you
respond, please ignore the fact that we have a pandemic requiring
infection control measures. Some local politicians were invited by a
local Muslim community centre to the annual spring festival. On
attendance, local politicians put out their hands to greet the hosts.
[r24_dvshax_ran1]. [r24_dvshax_ran1] After the meeting, some of the
attendees expressed discomfort about the situation and requested that
all the attendees should shake hands the next time.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you for or against local politicians presenting such
a proposal?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely in favour |
554 |
26.6% |
0.26621816 |
| 2 |
Slightly support |
474 |
22.8% |
0.22777511 |
| 3 |
Slightly oppose |
489 |
23.5% |
0.23498318 |
| 4 |
Completely opposed |
527 |
25.3% |
0.25324363 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
1.8% |
0.01777991 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvimc_1
|
Variable label:
|
Descriptions apply to you: It is important for me personally to be
unprejudiced in regard to immigrants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to
immigrants
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
449 |
21.6% |
0.21576165 |
| 2 |
Good |
802 |
38.5% |
0.38539164 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
332 |
16.0% |
0.15953868 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
342 |
16.4% |
0.16434407 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
55 |
2.6% |
0.02642960 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
36 |
1.7% |
0.01729938 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
21 |
1.0% |
0.01009130 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.1% |
0.02114368 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvimc_2
|
Variable label:
|
Descriptions apply to you: I do not want to appear to be racist, not
even to myself
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
537 |
25.8% |
0.25804901 |
| 2 |
Good |
689 |
33.1% |
0.33109082 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
270 |
13.0% |
0.12974531 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
392 |
18.8% |
0.18837098 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
57 |
2.7% |
0.02739068 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
48 |
2.3% |
0.02306583 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
33 |
1.6% |
0.01585776 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
2.6% |
0.02642960 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvimc_3
|
Variable label:
|
Descriptions apply to you: I feel guilty if I think negatively about
immigrants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
168 |
8.1% |
0.08073042 |
| 2 |
Good |
359 |
17.3% |
0.17251321 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
302 |
14.5% |
0.14512254 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
708 |
34.0% |
0.34022105 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
160 |
7.7% |
0.07688611 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
208 |
10.0% |
0.09995195 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
118 |
5.7% |
0.05670351 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
2.8% |
0.02787122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvimc_4
|
Variable label:
|
Descriptions apply to you: I try to be unprejudiced in regard to
immigrants due to my own convictions.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants due to my own
convictions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
433 |
20.8% |
0.208073042 |
| 2 |
Good |
782 |
37.6% |
0.375780875 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
343 |
16.5% |
0.164824604 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
365 |
17.5% |
0.175396444 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
50 |
2.4% |
0.024026910 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
37 |
1.8% |
0.017779914 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009130226 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
2.5% |
0.024987987 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtra1
|
Variable label:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them
are quite correct?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them
are quite correct?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To understand the world, we need to free ourselves from established traditions |
901 |
43.3% |
0.43296492 |
| 2 |
Established traditions provide us with the wisdom needed to understand the world |
1088 |
52.3% |
0.52282556 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
92 |
4.4% |
0.04420951 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtra2
|
Variable label:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them
are quite correct?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them
are quite correct?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
If an idea has been around for a long time, it probably needs to be updated |
1119 |
53.8% |
0.53772225 |
| 2 |
If an idea has been around for a long time, it probably contains wisdom |
859 |
41.3% |
0.41278232 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
103 |
4.9% |
0.04949543 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtra3
|
Variable label:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them
are quite correct?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them
are quite correct?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The world is constantly changing, so we should adjust our views about what is
the morally correct way of being |
1406 |
67.6% |
0.6756367 |
| 2 |
Even though the world is constantly changing, it would be wrong to adapt our
views about what is the morally correct way of being |
599 |
28.8% |
0.2878424 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
76 |
3.7% |
0.0365209 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_dvtra4
|
Variable label:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them
are quite correct?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them
are quite correct?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Traditions are often not worth following because they are discriminatory towards
unique peoples |
459 |
22.1% |
0.22056704 |
| 2 |
Traditions are often worth following because they connect us to our shared past |
1540 |
74.0% |
0.74002883 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
82 |
3.9% |
0.03940413 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_smtoi_1
|
Variable label:
|
Social media contribute towards: Increased polarisation - Increased
sense of community
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the public debate, social media are often referred to as being good
or bad for democracy. To what extent do you think social media
contribute towards:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increased polarisation - Increased sense of community
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[The respondent used a slider to assign a value between -5 and +5.][The
glider was not positioned on a set value at the start of the question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1956]
[Invalid:8204] [Range:-5-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| -5 |
-5 Increased polarisation |
283 |
14.5% |
0.14468303 |
| -4 |
-4 |
240 |
12.3% |
0.12269939 |
| -3 |
-3 |
318 |
16.3% |
0.16257669 |
| -2 |
-2 |
234 |
12.0% |
0.11963190 |
| -1 |
-1 |
154 |
7.9% |
0.07873211 |
| 0 |
0 |
327 |
16.7% |
0.16717791 |
| 1 |
1 |
106 |
5.4% |
0.05419223 |
| 2 |
2 |
106 |
5.4% |
0.05419223 |
| 3 |
3 |
96 |
4.9% |
0.04907975 |
| 4 |
4 |
52 |
2.7% |
0.02658487 |
| 5 |
5 Increased sense of community |
40 |
2.0% |
0.02044990 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8204 |
|
NA |
r24_smtoi_2
|
Variable label:
|
Social media contribute towards: Manipulation - Transparency
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the public debate, social media are often referred to as being good
or bad for democracy. To what extent do you think social media
contribute towards:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Manipulation - Transparency
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[The respondent used a slider to assign a value between -5 and +5.][The
glider was not positioned on a set value at the start of the question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1955]
[Invalid:8205] [Range:-5-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| -5 |
-5 Manipulation |
229 |
11.7% |
0.11713555 |
| -4 |
-4 |
232 |
11.9% |
0.11867008 |
| -3 |
-3 |
353 |
18.1% |
0.18056266 |
| -2 |
-2 |
310 |
15.9% |
0.15856777 |
| -1 |
-1 |
189 |
9.7% |
0.09667519 |
| 0 |
0 |
333 |
17.0% |
0.17033248 |
| 1 |
1 |
85 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
| 2 |
2 |
86 |
4.4% |
0.04398977 |
| 3 |
3 |
71 |
3.6% |
0.03631714 |
| 4 |
4 |
42 |
2.1% |
0.02148338 |
| 5 |
5 Transparency |
25 |
1.3% |
0.01278772 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8205 |
|
NA |
r24_smtoi_3
|
Variable label:
|
Social media contribute towards: Expressions of hatred - Inclusion
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the public debate, social media are often referred to as being good
or bad for democracy. To what extent do you think social media
contribute towards:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Expressions of hatred - Inclusion
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[The respondent used a slider to assign a value between -5 and +5.][The
glider was not positioned on a set value at the start of the question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1955]
[Invalid:8205] [Range:-5-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| -5 |
-5 Expressions of hatred |
194 |
9.9% |
0.09923274 |
| -4 |
-4 |
209 |
10.7% |
0.10690537 |
| -3 |
-3 |
281 |
14.4% |
0.14373402 |
| -2 |
-2 |
237 |
12.1% |
0.12122762 |
| -1 |
-1 |
193 |
9.9% |
0.09872123 |
| 0 |
0 |
442 |
22.6% |
0.22608696 |
| 1 |
1 |
129 |
6.6% |
0.06598465 |
| 2 |
2 |
118 |
6.0% |
0.06035806 |
| 3 |
3 |
87 |
4.5% |
0.04450128 |
| 4 |
4 |
43 |
2.2% |
0.02199488 |
| 5 |
5 Inclusion |
22 |
1.1% |
0.01125320 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8205 |
|
NA |
r24_smtoi_4
|
Variable label:
|
Social media contribute towards: Intolerance - Tolerance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the public debate, social media are often referred to as being good
or bad for democracy. To what extent do you think social media
contribute towards:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Intolerance - Tolerance
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[The respondent used a slider to assign a value between -5 and +5.][The
glider was not positioned on a set value at the start of the question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1948]
[Invalid:8212] [Range:-5-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| -5 |
-5 Intolerance |
202 |
10.4% |
0.103696099 |
| -4 |
-4 |
194 |
10.0% |
0.099589322 |
| -3 |
-3 |
279 |
14.3% |
0.143223819 |
| -2 |
-2 |
259 |
13.3% |
0.132956879 |
| -1 |
-1 |
223 |
11.4% |
0.114476386 |
| 0 |
0 |
430 |
22.1% |
0.220739220 |
| 1 |
1 |
134 |
6.9% |
0.068788501 |
| 2 |
2 |
99 |
5.1% |
0.050821355 |
| 3 |
3 |
72 |
3.7% |
0.036960986 |
| 4 |
4 |
37 |
1.9% |
0.018993840 |
| 5 |
5 Tolerance |
19 |
1.0% |
0.009753593 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8212 |
|
NA |
r24_smtoi_5
|
Variable label:
|
Social media contribute towards: Reduced political engagement -
Increased political engagement
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the public debate, social media are often referred to as being good
or bad for democracy. To what extent do you think social media
contribute towards:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reduced political engagement - Increased political engagement
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
[The respondent used a slider to assign a value between -5 and +5.][The
glider was not positioned on a set value at the start of the question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1953]
[Invalid:8207] [Range:-5-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| -5 |
-5 Reduced political engagement |
105 |
5.4% |
0.05376344 |
| -4 |
-4 |
97 |
5.0% |
0.04966718 |
| -3 |
-3 |
109 |
5.6% |
0.05581157 |
| -2 |
-2 |
98 |
5.0% |
0.05017921 |
| -1 |
-1 |
138 |
7.1% |
0.07066052 |
| 0 |
0 |
443 |
22.7% |
0.22683052 |
| 1 |
1 |
243 |
12.4% |
0.12442396 |
| 2 |
2 |
274 |
14.0% |
0.14029698 |
| 3 |
3 |
210 |
10.8% |
0.10752688 |
| 4 |
4 |
131 |
6.7% |
0.06707629 |
| 5 |
5 Increased political engagement |
105 |
5.4% |
0.05376344 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8207 |
|
NA |
r24_smdebx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_smdebx]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2043] [Invalid:8117]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
politicians |
506 |
24.8% |
0.2476750 |
| 2 |
journalists |
511 |
25.0% |
0.2501224 |
| 3 |
activists |
537 |
26.3% |
0.2628488 |
| 4 |
influencers |
489 |
23.9% |
0.2393539 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8117 |
|
NA |
r24_smdebx
|
Variable label:
|
Contribute to a better or worse tone in the online debate: Many
[r24_smdebx_ran] initiate political discussions through their own social
media accounts.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many [r24_smdebx_ran] initiate political discussions through their own
social media accounts.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say they generally contribute to a better or worse tone in the
online debate?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Far worse |
177 |
8.5% |
0.085055262 |
| 2 |
Much worse |
506 |
24.3% |
0.243152331 |
| 3 |
Slightly worse |
531 |
25.5% |
0.255165786 |
| 4 |
Neither better nor worse |
619 |
29.7% |
0.297453148 |
| 5 |
Slightly better |
130 |
6.2% |
0.062469966 |
| 6 |
Much better |
38 |
1.8% |
0.018260452 |
| 7 |
Far better |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001922153 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
76 |
3.7% |
0.036520903 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_smabp
|
Variable label:
|
Have you ever experienced any direct abuse in the form of hatred,
threats or derogatory comments on social media?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now think about the past year.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you ever experienced any direct abuse in the form of hatred,
threats or derogatory comments on social media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Daily |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002402691 |
| 2 |
Several times a week |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005285920 |
| 3 |
Once a month |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004805382 |
| 4 |
Sometimes |
86 |
4.1% |
0.041326285 |
| 5 |
Less frequently |
167 |
8.0% |
0.080249880 |
| 6 |
Never |
1501 |
72.1% |
0.721287842 |
| 7 |
I don't use social media |
249 |
12.0% |
0.119654012 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
2.5% |
0.024987987 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_smabo
|
Variable label:
|
Have you experienced others being subjected to direct abuse in the form
of hatred, threats or derogatory comments on social media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you experienced others being subjected to direct abuse in the form
of hatred, threats or derogatory comments on social media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Daily |
61 |
2.9% |
0.02931283 |
| 2 |
Several times a week |
208 |
10.0% |
0.09995195 |
| 3 |
Once a month |
94 |
4.5% |
0.04517059 |
| 4 |
Sometimes |
596 |
28.6% |
0.28640077 |
| 5 |
Less frequently |
349 |
16.8% |
0.16770783 |
| 6 |
Never |
519 |
24.9% |
0.24939933 |
| 7 |
I don't use social media |
193 |
9.3% |
0.09274387 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
61 |
2.9% |
0.02931283 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
r24_smspw
|
Variable label:
|
During the course of a typical week, how often do you share news or
actively participate in discussions about politics and society on social
media
|
|
Literal question:
|
During the course of a typical week, how often do you share news or
actively participate in discussions about politics and society on social
media (such as Facebook, Twitter, TikTok):
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_smabo != 7 & r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
7 |
0.4% |
0.003707627 |
| 2 |
Daily |
26 |
1.4% |
0.013771186 |
| 3 |
5-6 times a week |
13 |
0.7% |
0.006885593 |
| 4 |
3-4 times a week |
40 |
2.1% |
0.021186441 |
| 5 |
1-2 times a week |
110 |
5.8% |
0.058262712 |
| 6 |
Less frequently |
733 |
38.8% |
0.388241525 |
| 7 |
Never |
910 |
48.2% |
0.481991525 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
49 |
2.6% |
0.025953390 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8272 |
|
NA |
r24_smepw
|
Variable label:
|
During the course of a typical week, how often do you come across news
or discussions about politics and society on social media
|
|
Literal question:
|
During the course of a typical week, how often do you come across news
or discussions about politics and society on social media (such as
Facebook, Twitter, TikTok):
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_smabo != 7 & r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
173 |
9.2% |
0.09163136 |
| 2 |
Daily |
443 |
23.5% |
0.23463983 |
| 3 |
5-6 times a week |
113 |
6.0% |
0.05985169 |
| 4 |
3-4 times a week |
190 |
10.1% |
0.10063559 |
| 5 |
1-2 times a week |
318 |
16.8% |
0.16843220 |
| 6 |
Less frequently |
345 |
18.3% |
0.18273305 |
| 7 |
Never |
249 |
13.2% |
0.13188559 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
3.0% |
0.03019068 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8272 |
|
NA |
r24_dvpubx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_dvpubx1]
and [r24_dvpubx2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2041] [Invalid:8119]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Blank] |
1034 |
50.7% |
0.5066144 |
| 2 |
be allowed to |
1007 |
49.3% |
0.4933856 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8119 |
|
NA |
r24_dvpubx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent will be exposed to
[r24_dvpubx1] or [r24_dbpubx2]-
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2041] [Invalid:8119]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selects r24_dvpubx1 |
981 |
48.1% |
0.4806467 |
| 2 |
Selects r24_dvpubx2 |
1060 |
51.9% |
0.5193533 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8119 |
|
NA |
r24_dvpubx1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree or disagree that Norwegian newspapers should [r24_dvpubx_ran1]
publish posts criticising muslims and their religious values?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norwegian newspapers should
[r24_dvpubx_ran1] publish posts criticising muslims and their religious
values?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_dvpubx_ran2 = 1 & r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
353 |
36.0% |
0.35983690 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
324 |
33.0% |
0.33027523 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
181 |
18.5% |
0.18450561 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
111 |
11.3% |
0.11314985 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.2% |
0.01223242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9179 |
|
NA |
r24_dvpubx2
|
Variable label:
|
Is there a majority or minority in Norway who believe that Norwegian
newspapers should [r24_dvpubx_ran1] publish posts criticising muslims
and their religious values?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is there a majority or minority in Norway who believe that Norwegian
newspapers should [r24_dvpubx_ran1] publish posts criticising Muslims
and their religious values?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_dvpubx_ran2 = 2 & r24_group = 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A majority |
378 |
35.7% |
0.35660377 |
| 2 |
A minority |
651 |
61.4% |
0.61415094 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.9% |
0.02924528 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9100 |
|
NA |
r24_hesiw
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think sinusitis is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think sinusitis is?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Write down the first thing that comes to mind. It’s your opinion we’re
interested in:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_hesic
|
Variable label:
|
Have you ever had sinusitis?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you ever had sinusitis?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is enough for the purposes of this survey if you have had your own
suspicions. It does not have to have been diagnosed by a doctor.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1152 |
55.9% |
0.558680892 |
| 2 |
No |
659 |
32.0% |
0.319592629 |
| 3 |
Not sure |
231 |
11.2% |
0.112027158 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.0% |
0.009699321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_hesid
|
Variable label:
|
What prompts you to contact your doctor when you have a severe cold of
suspect sinusititis?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What prompts you to contact your doctor when you have a severe cold of
suspect sinusititis?
|
|
Post-question:
|
By “prompts” we mean what complaints or needs make you contact your
doctor.
Please write here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_hesia
|
Variable label:
|
If you see your doctor for a severe cold or sinusitis, what do you think
determines whether or not you are prescribed antibiotics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you see your doctor for a severe cold or sinusitis, what do you think
determines whether or not you are prescribed antibiotics?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Write down the first thing that comes to mind. It’s your opinion we’re
interested in:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_hesda
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It is easy for the doctor to decide whether or not you
will benefit from a course of antibiotics for your sinusitis.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is easy for the doctor to decide whether or not you will benefit from
a course of antibiotics for your sinusitis.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
43 |
2.1% |
0.02085354 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
247 |
12.0% |
0.11978661 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
722 |
35.0% |
0.35014549 |
| 4 |
Agree |
849 |
41.2% |
0.41173618 |
| 5 |
Strongly agree |
170 |
8.2% |
0.08244423 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.5% |
0.01503395 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_hesih
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Antibiotics help my sinusitis.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Antibiotics help my sinusitis.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
50 |
2.4% |
0.02424830 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
192 |
9.3% |
0.09311348 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1077 |
52.2% |
0.52230844 |
| 4 |
Agree |
614 |
29.8% |
0.29776916 |
| 5 |
Strongly agree |
89 |
4.3% |
0.04316198 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
1.9% |
0.01939864 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_hestd
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I have confidence that if my doctor prescribes
antibiotics for my sinusitis, then such is necessary in order for me to
get better.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have confidence that if my doctor prescribes antibiotics for my
sinusitis, then such is necessary in order for me to get better.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
61 |
3.0% |
0.02958293 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
151 |
7.3% |
0.07322987 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
347 |
16.8% |
0.16828322 |
| 4 |
Agree |
1189 |
57.7% |
0.57662464 |
| 5 |
Strongly agree |
280 |
13.6% |
0.13579049 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
1.6% |
0.01648885 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_hedepx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_hedepx1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2042] [Invalid:8118]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Kristian is 42 years old. During the last few weeks he has been feeling sad
every day. Kristian's sadness has been constant and he can find no explanation
for it, based on anything that has happened or the time of year. It's hard
for him to go to work every day. He used to enjoy his work and being with his
colleagues. Now he can no longer find any pleasure in it or in any of the other
activities he enjoyed before. Usually Kristian likes to go out with his friends
and his brother, but now he stays more at home. Kristian feels very guilty about
feeling so sad and he feels that he has let his brother and friends down. His
brother has now said that Kristian becomes too easily distracted and that he is
unable to concentrate and make decisions. Since these challenges began, Kristian
has been sleeping badly every night. He has had difficulty falling asleep and
wakes up often during the night. When he was lying awake a few nights ago trying
to get to sleep, he started crying because he felt so helpless. |
1033 |
50.6% |
0.5058766 |
| 2 |
Kristine is 42. During the last few weeks she has been feeling sad every day.
Kristine's sadness has been constant and she can find no explanation for it,
based on anything that has happened or the time of year. It's hard for her to go
to work every day. She used to enjoy her work and being with her colleagues. Now
she can no longer find any pleasure in it or in any of the other activities she
enjoyed before. Usually Kristine likes to go out with friends and her sister,
but now she stays more at home. Kristine feels very guilty about feeling so
sad and she feels that she has let her sister and friends down. Her sister has
now said that Kristine becomes too easily distracted and that she is unable to
concentrate and make decisions. Since these challenges began, Kristine has been
sleeping badly every night. She has had difficulty falling asleep and wakes up
often during the night. When she was lying awake a few nights ago trying to get
to sleep, she started crying because she felt so helpless. |
1009 |
49.4% |
0.4941234 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8118 |
|
NA |
r24_hedepx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects text piping alternative for [r24_hedepx1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Set to same gendervalue as [r24_hedpx_ran1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2042] [Invalid:8118]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Kristian |
1033 |
50.6% |
0.5058766 |
| 2 |
Kristine |
1009 |
49.4% |
0.4941234 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8118 |
|
NA |
r24_hedepx_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_hedepx2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Set to opposite gendervalue from [r24_hedpx_ran1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2042] [Invalid:8118]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
men |
1033 |
50.6% |
0.5058766 |
| 2 |
women |
1009 |
49.4% |
0.4941234 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8118 |
|
NA |
r24_hedepx1_1
|
Variable label:
|
If you had felt like [r24_hedepx_ran2], would you go and see a doctor or
a psychologist?: Doctor
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[r24_hedepx_ran1] If you had felt like [r24_hedepx_ran2], would you go
and see a doctor or a psychologist?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Doctor
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly unlikely |
152 |
7.4% |
0.07371484 |
| 2 |
Unlikely |
177 |
8.6% |
0.08583899 |
| 3 |
Somewhat unlikely |
198 |
9.6% |
0.09602328 |
| 4 |
Fairly likely |
457 |
22.2% |
0.22162949 |
| 5 |
Likely |
655 |
31.8% |
0.31765276 |
| 6 |
Highly likely |
352 |
17.1% |
0.17070805 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
3.4% |
0.03443259 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_hedepx1_2
|
Variable label:
|
If you had felt like [r24_hedepx_ran2], would you go and see a doctor or
a psychologist?: Psychologist
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[r24_hedepx_ran1] If you had felt like [r24_hedepx_ran2], would you go
and see a doctor or a psychologist?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Psychologist
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly unlikely |
298 |
14.5% |
0.14451988 |
| 2 |
Unlikely |
357 |
17.3% |
0.17313288 |
| 3 |
Somewhat unlikely |
293 |
14.2% |
0.14209505 |
| 4 |
Fairly likely |
403 |
19.5% |
0.19544132 |
| 5 |
Likely |
347 |
16.8% |
0.16828322 |
| 6 |
Highly likely |
211 |
10.2% |
0.10232784 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
153 |
7.4% |
0.07419981 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_hedepx2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think [r24_hedepx_ran3] most people would see a doctor or
psychologist if they felt like [r24_hedepx_ran2]?: Doctor
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think [r24_hedepx_ran3] most people would see a doctor or
psychologist if they felt like [r24_hedepx_ran]?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Doctor
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly unlikely |
109 |
5.3% |
0.05286130 |
| 2 |
Unlikely |
250 |
12.1% |
0.12124151 |
| 3 |
Somewhat unlikely |
334 |
16.2% |
0.16197866 |
| 4 |
Fairly likely |
620 |
30.1% |
0.30067895 |
| 5 |
Likely |
543 |
26.3% |
0.26333657 |
| 6 |
Highly likely |
147 |
7.1% |
0.07129001 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
2.9% |
0.02861300 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_hedepx2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think [r24_hedepx_ran3] most people would see a doctor or
psychologist if they felt like [r24_hedepx_ran2]?: Psychologist
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think [r24_hedepx_ran3] most people would see a doctor or
psychologist if they felt like [r24_hedepx_ran2]?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Psychologist
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly unlikely |
237 |
11.5% |
0.11493695 |
| 2 |
Unlikely |
444 |
21.5% |
0.21532493 |
| 3 |
Somewhat unlikely |
507 |
24.6% |
0.24587779 |
| 4 |
Fairly likely |
475 |
23.0% |
0.23035887 |
| 5 |
Likely |
180 |
8.7% |
0.08729389 |
| 6 |
Highly likely |
53 |
2.6% |
0.02570320 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
166 |
8.1% |
0.08050436 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (gender) for textpiping in the
first column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
972 |
47.7% |
0.4771723 |
| 2 |
Female |
1065 |
52.3% |
0.5228277 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (gender) for textpiping in the
second column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1030 |
50.6% |
0.5056456 |
| 2 |
Female |
1007 |
49.4% |
0.4943544 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (age) for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Mid 20s |
981 |
48.2% |
0.4815906 |
| 2 |
Mid 50s |
1056 |
51.8% |
0.5184094 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (age) for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Mid 20s |
1021 |
50.1% |
0.5012273 |
| 2 |
Mid 50s |
1016 |
49.9% |
0.4987727 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (family status) for textpiping in
the first column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
676 |
33.2% |
0.3318606 |
| 2 |
Married without children |
688 |
33.8% |
0.3377516 |
| 3 |
Married with 2 children |
673 |
33.0% |
0.3303878 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (family status) for textpiping in
the second column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
692 |
34.0% |
0.3397153 |
| 2 |
Married without children |
707 |
34.7% |
0.3470790 |
| 3 |
Married with 2 children |
638 |
31.3% |
0.3132057 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (country) for textpiping in the
first column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Born in Norway |
693 |
34.0% |
0.3402062 |
| 2 |
Immigrated to Norway from Germany |
683 |
33.5% |
0.3352970 |
| 3 |
Immigrated to Norway from Syria |
661 |
32.4% |
0.3244968 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (country) for textpiping in the
second column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Born in Norway |
696 |
34.2% |
0.3416789 |
| 2 |
Immigrated to Norway from Germany |
671 |
32.9% |
0.3294060 |
| 3 |
Immigrated to Norway from Syria |
670 |
32.9% |
0.3289151 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (religion) for textpiping in the
first column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Christian |
670 |
32.9% |
0.3289151 |
| 2 |
Muslim |
704 |
34.6% |
0.3456063 |
| 3 |
No religious affiliation |
663 |
32.5% |
0.3254786 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (religion) for textpiping in the
second column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Christian |
675 |
33.1% |
0.3313697 |
| 2 |
Muslim |
667 |
32.7% |
0.3274423 |
| 3 |
No religious affiliation |
695 |
34.1% |
0.3411880 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (education) for textpiping in the
first column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Higher education |
1052 |
51.6% |
0.5164458 |
| 2 |
No higher education |
985 |
48.4% |
0.4835542 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (education) for textpiping in the
second column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Higher education |
1020 |
50.1% |
0.5007364 |
| 2 |
No higher education |
1017 |
49.9% |
0.4992636 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (political party) for textpiping in
the first column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
404 |
19.8% |
0.1983309 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
423 |
20.8% |
0.2076583 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
385 |
18.9% |
0.1890034 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
433 |
21.3% |
0.2125675 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
392 |
19.2% |
0.1924399 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_ran7_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (political party) for textpiping in
the second column in [r24_dvneix1]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
432 |
21.2% |
0.2120766 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
428 |
21.0% |
0.2101129 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
402 |
19.7% |
0.1973490 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
391 |
19.2% |
0.1919489 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
384 |
18.9% |
0.1885125 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1_rerandomize
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If all values in the first and second column in
[r24_dvneix1] are equal after first randomisation, one of the variables
are randomised again. This variable indicates if that has been done.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rerandomized |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001963672 |
| 0 |
Not rerandomized |
2033 |
99.8% |
0.998036328 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (gender) for textpiping in the
first column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1047 |
51.4% |
0.5139912 |
| 2 |
Female |
990 |
48.6% |
0.4860088 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (gender) for textpiping in the
second column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1027 |
50.4% |
0.5041728 |
| 2 |
Female |
1010 |
49.6% |
0.4958272 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (age) for textpiping in the first
column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Mid 20s |
986 |
48.4% |
0.4840452 |
| 2 |
Mid 50s |
1051 |
51.6% |
0.5159548 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (age) for textpiping in the second
column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Mid 20s |
1027 |
50.4% |
0.5041728 |
| 2 |
Mid 50s |
1010 |
49.6% |
0.4958272 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (family status) for textpiping in
the first column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
653 |
32.1% |
0.3205695 |
| 2 |
Married without children |
662 |
32.5% |
0.3249877 |
| 3 |
Married with 2 children |
722 |
35.4% |
0.3544428 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (family status) for textpiping in
the second column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
696 |
34.2% |
0.3416789 |
| 2 |
Married without children |
668 |
32.8% |
0.3279332 |
| 3 |
Married with 2 children |
673 |
33.0% |
0.3303878 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (country) for textpiping in the
first column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Born in Norway |
689 |
33.8% |
0.3382425 |
| 2 |
Immigrated to Norway from Germany |
675 |
33.1% |
0.3313697 |
| 3 |
Immigrated to Norway from Syria |
673 |
33.0% |
0.3303878 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (country) for textpiping in the
second column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Born in Norway |
674 |
33.1% |
0.3308787 |
| 2 |
Immigrated to Norway from Germany |
704 |
34.6% |
0.3456063 |
| 3 |
Immigrated to Norway from Syria |
659 |
32.4% |
0.3235150 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (religion) for textpiping in the
first column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Christian |
695 |
34.1% |
0.3411880 |
| 2 |
Muslim |
670 |
32.9% |
0.3289151 |
| 3 |
No religious affiliation |
672 |
33.0% |
0.3298969 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (religion) for textpiping in the
second column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Christian |
678 |
33.3% |
0.3328424 |
| 2 |
Muslim |
697 |
34.2% |
0.3421699 |
| 3 |
No religious affiliation |
662 |
32.5% |
0.3249877 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (education) for textpiping in the
first column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Higher education |
1030 |
50.6% |
0.5056456 |
| 2 |
No higher education |
1007 |
49.4% |
0.4943544 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (education) for textpiping in the
second column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Higher education |
1025 |
50.3% |
0.503191 |
| 2 |
No higher education |
1012 |
49.7% |
0.496809 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (political party) for textpiping in
the first column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
385 |
18.9% |
0.1890034 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
409 |
20.1% |
0.2007855 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
393 |
19.3% |
0.1929308 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
451 |
22.1% |
0.2214040 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
399 |
19.6% |
0.1958763 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_ran7_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects a value (political party) for textpiping in
the second column in [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
418 |
20.5% |
0.2052037 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
391 |
19.2% |
0.1919489 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
395 |
19.4% |
0.1939126 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
419 |
20.6% |
0.2056946 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
414 |
20.3% |
0.2032401 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2_rerandomize
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. If all values in the first and second column in
[r24_dvneix2] are equal after first randomisation, one of the variables
are randomised again. This variable indicates if that has been done.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2037] [Invalid:8123]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rerandomized |
1 |
0.0% |
0.000490918 |
| 0 |
Not rerandomized |
2036 |
100.0% |
0.999509082 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8123 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Which of these two people you would have preferred to be
friends with?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We’re curious about which of these two people you would have
preferred to be friends with?
Person 1
[r24_dvneix1_ran1_1]
[r24_dvneix1_ran2_1]
[r24_dvneix1_ran3_1]
[r24_dvneix1_ran4_1]
[r24_dvneix1_ran5_1]
[r24_dvneix1_ran6_1]
[r24_dvneix1_ran7_1]
Person 2
[r24_dvneix1_ran1_2]
[r24_dvneix1_ran2_2]
[r24_dvneix1_ran3_2]
[r24_dvneix1_ran4_2]
[r24_dvneix1_ran5_2]
[r24_dvneix1_ran6_2]
[r24_dvneix1_ran7_2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
We’re curious about which of these two people you would have preferred
to be friends with?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
[The variables in the table was posed in random order][The question was
posed in random order with [r24_dvneix2]. Order is stored in
[r24_dvneix_order]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Person 1 |
997 |
48.4% |
0.48351115 |
| 2 |
Person 2 |
941 |
45.6% |
0.45635306 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
124 |
6.0% |
0.06013579 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Which of these two people you would have preferred to be
neighbours with?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We’re curious about which of these two people you would have
preferred to be neighbours with?
Person 1
[r24_dvneix1_ran1_1]
[r24_dvneix1_ran2_1]
[r24_dvneix1_ran3_1]
[r24_dvneix1_ran4_1]
[r24_dvneix1_ran5_1]
[r24_dvneix1_ran6_1]
[r24_dvneix1_ran7_1]
Person 2
[r24_dvneix1_ran1_2]
[r24_dvneix1_ran2_2]
[r24_dvneix1_ran3_2]
[r24_dvneix1_ran4_2]
[r24_dvneix1_ran5_2]
[r24_dvneix1_ran6_2]
[r24_dvneix1_ran7_2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
We’re curious about which of these two people you would have preferred
to be neighbours with?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_group = 5]
[The variables in the table was posed in random order][The question was
posed in random order with [r24_dvneix1]. Order is stored in
[r24_dvneix_order]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Person 1 |
1021 |
49.5% |
0.49515034 |
| 2 |
Person 2 |
916 |
44.4% |
0.44422890 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
125 |
6.1% |
0.06062076 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
r24_dvneix_order
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Display order of [r24_dvneix1] and [r24_dvneix2]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_group = 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2034] [Invalid:8126]
[Range:-]
|
r24_ceelc_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Compensate consumers when
electricity prices are high
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that
the authorities should…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…compensate consumers when electricity prices are high
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 1 & rekruttert = 1,3,8,11)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
253 |
27.0% |
0.27029915 |
| 2 |
Agree |
276 |
29.5% |
0.29487179 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
182 |
19.4% |
0.19444444 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
51 |
5.4% |
0.05448718 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
71 |
7.6% |
0.07585470 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
46 |
4.9% |
0.04914530 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
23 |
2.5% |
0.02457265 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
3.6% |
0.03632479 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9224 |
|
NA |
r24_ceelc_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Expand Norwegian power
production
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that
the authorities should…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…expand Norwegian power production
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 1 & rekruttert = 1,3,8,11)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
256 |
27.4% |
0.27350427 |
| 2 |
Agree |
311 |
33.2% |
0.33226496 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
186 |
19.9% |
0.19871795 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
74 |
7.9% |
0.07905983 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
39 |
4.2% |
0.04166667 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
19 |
2.0% |
0.02029915 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
1.8% |
0.01816239 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
3.6% |
0.03632479 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9224 |
|
NA |
r24_ceelc_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Export less electricity
abroad
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that
the authorities should…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…export less electricity abroad
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 1 & rekruttert = 1,3,8,11)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
323 |
34.5% |
0.34508547 |
| 2 |
Agree |
223 |
23.8% |
0.23824786 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
170 |
18.2% |
0.18162393 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
81 |
8.7% |
0.08653846 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
50 |
5.3% |
0.05341880 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
45 |
4.8% |
0.04807692 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
1.5% |
0.01495726 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
3.2% |
0.03205128 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9224 |
|
NA |
r24_ceelc_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Refrain from introducing
measures to reduce electricity costs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that
the authorities should…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…refrain from introducing measures to reduce electricity costs
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 1 & rekruttert = 1,3,8,11)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
13 |
1.4% |
0.01388889 |
| 2 |
Agree |
20 |
2.1% |
0.02136752 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
46 |
4.9% |
0.04914530 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
86 |
9.2% |
0.09188034 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
128 |
13.7% |
0.13675214 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
298 |
31.8% |
0.31837607 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
298 |
31.8% |
0.31837607 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
47 |
5.0% |
0.05021368 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9224 |
|
NA |
r24_ceelc_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Increase financial support
for electricity-saving measures
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that
the authorities should…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…increase financial support for electricity-saving measures
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 1 & rekruttert = 1,3,8,11)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
296 |
31.6% |
0.316239316 |
| 2 |
Agree |
348 |
37.2% |
0.371794872 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
165 |
17.6% |
0.176282051 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
47 |
5.0% |
0.050213675 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
23 |
2.5% |
0.024572650 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
15 |
1.6% |
0.016025641 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
0.7% |
0.007478632 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
3.7% |
0.037393162 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9224 |
|
NA |
r24_ceelc_6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Other: Write here
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that
the authorities should…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other: Write here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 1 & rekruttert = 1,3,8,11)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
134 |
14.3% |
0.143162393 |
| 2 |
Agree |
22 |
2.4% |
0.023504274 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002136752 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
31 |
3.3% |
0.033119658 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001068376 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
0.7% |
0.007478632 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
739 |
79.0% |
0.789529915 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9224 |
|
NA |
r24_ceelc_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree that the authorities should: Other: Write here
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The authorities can introduce various measures to reduce electricity
costs for consumers in Norway. How much do you agree or disagree that
the authorities should…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other: Write here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r24_group = 1 & rekruttert = 1,3,8,11)]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:10160] [Range:-]
|
r24_corona_utvalg
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly assigns a group which determines what
corona-questions the respondent will be exposed to.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_panel = 1]
[Weighted randomization with a 2/3-allocation.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1736] [Invalid:8424]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Sample A (approx. 2/3) |
1169 |
67.3% |
0.6733871 |
| 2 |
Sample B (approx. 1/3) |
567 |
32.7% |
0.3266129 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8424 |
|
NA |
r24_hecli
|
Variable label:
|
I do my best to limit the risk of infection
|
|
Literal question:
|
I do my best to limit the risk of infection (washing hands frequently,
avoiding travel and situations involving contact with other people,
keeping a distance and avoiding touching things)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_panel = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
97 |
5.5% |
0.05536530 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
284 |
16.2% |
0.16210046 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
314 |
17.9% |
0.17922374 |
| 4 |
Agree |
670 |
38.2% |
0.38242009 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
369 |
21.1% |
0.21061644 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.0% |
0.01027397 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8408 |
|
NA |
r24_hecri
|
Variable label:
|
How likely do you think it is that you will be infected by the
coronavirus (or re-infected, if you have already had it)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely do you think it is that you will be infected by the
coronavirus (or re-infected, if you have already had it)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_panel = 1 & r24_corona_utvalg = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly unlikely |
225 |
19.2% |
0.192472198 |
| 2 |
Fairly unlikely |
413 |
35.3% |
0.353293413 |
| 3 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
407 |
34.8% |
0.348160821 |
| 4 |
Fairly likely |
98 |
8.4% |
0.083832335 |
| 5 |
Highly likely |
20 |
1.7% |
0.017108640 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005132592 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8991 |
|
NA |
r24_hechc
|
Variable label:
|
I am optimistic that I will be able to deal with any challenges that
have been or will be presented to me by the coronavirus outbreak.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I am optimistic that I will be able to deal with any challenges that
have been or will be presented to me by the coronavirus outbreak.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_panel = 1 & r24_corona_utvalg = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007698888 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
13 |
1.1% |
0.011120616 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
72 |
6.2% |
0.061591104 |
| 4 |
Agree |
647 |
55.3% |
0.553464500 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
413 |
35.3% |
0.353293413 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
1.3% |
0.012831480 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8991 |
|
NA |
r24_hecwp
|
Variable label:
|
I worry that I will get infected by the coronavirus.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I worry that I will get infected by the coronavirus.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_panel = 1 & r24_corona_utvalg = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
167 |
29.5% |
0.294532628 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
220 |
38.8% |
0.388007055 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
107 |
18.9% |
0.188712522 |
| 4 |
Agree |
62 |
10.9% |
0.109347443 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
10 |
1.8% |
0.017636684 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001763668 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9593 |
|
NA |
r24_hecwf
|
Variable label:
|
I worry that someone in my family will get infected by the coronavirus.
|
|
Literal question:
|
I worry that someone in my family will get infected by the coronavirus.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_panel = 1 & r24_corona_utvalg = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
102 |
18.0% |
0.179894180 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
199 |
35.1% |
0.350970018 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
121 |
21.3% |
0.213403880 |
| 4 |
Agree |
120 |
21.2% |
0.211640212 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
24 |
4.2% |
0.042328042 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001763668 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9593 |
|
NA |
r24_pampvx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_pampvx1 -
r24_pampvx3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_panel = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4120] [Invalid:6040]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
sent a photo with sexual content |
1399 |
34.0% |
0.3395631 |
| 2 |
threw a glass of water in his/her face |
1342 |
32.6% |
0.3257282 |
| 3 |
threatened to put an end to his/her political career |
1379 |
33.5% |
0.3347087 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6040 |
|
NA |
r24_pampvx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects text piping alternative for [r24_pampvx1 -
r24_pampvx3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_panel = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4120] [Invalid:6040]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The case ended when the candidate who was the subject of the incident withdraw
from politics. |
2069 |
50.2% |
0.5021845 |
| 2 |
[Blank] |
2051 |
49.8% |
0.4978155 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6040 |
|
NA |
r24_pampvx_1
|
Variable label:
|
Imagine a situation where two politicians are competing for a safe seat
in a general election and a situation occurs: To what extent do you
agree or disagree that such behaviour between politicians is acceptable?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a situation where two politicians are competing for a safe
seat in a general election.
Just before a decision was about to be made, it came to light that one
candidate had [r24_pampvx_ran1] to the other. [r24_pampvx_ran2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that such behaviour between
politicians is acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_panel = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
179 |
4.3% |
0.04277180 |
| 2 |
Agree |
137 |
3.3% |
0.03273596 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
107 |
2.6% |
0.02556750 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
274 |
6.5% |
0.06547192 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
185 |
4.4% |
0.04420550 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
924 |
22.1% |
0.22078853 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
2283 |
54.6% |
0.54551971 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
96 |
2.3% |
0.02293907 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5975 |
|
NA |
r24_pampvx_2
|
Variable label:
|
Imagine a situation where two politicians are competing for a safe seat
in a general election and a situation occurs: To what extent do you
agree or disagree that parties should sanction such behaviour?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a situation where two politicians are competing for a safe
seat in a general election.
Just before a decision was about to be made, it came to light that one
candidate had [r24_pampvx_ran1] to the other. [r24_pampvx_ran2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that parties should sanction
such behaviour?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_panel = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1722 |
41.1% |
0.41146953 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1259 |
30.1% |
0.30083632 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
422 |
10.1% |
0.10083632 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
409 |
9.8% |
0.09772999 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
104 |
2.5% |
0.02485066 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
70 |
1.7% |
0.01672640 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
86 |
2.1% |
0.02054958 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
113 |
2.7% |
0.02700119 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5975 |
|
NA |
r24_pampvx_3
|
Variable label:
|
Imagine a situation where two politicians are competing for a safe seat
in a general election and a situation occurs: To what extent do you
agree or disagree that such behaviour between politicians is a challenge
to democracy?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a situation where two politicians are competing for a safe
seat in a general election.
Just before a decision was about to be made, it came to light that one
candidate had [r24_pampvx_ran1] to the other. [r24_pampvx_ran2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that such behaviour between
politicians is a challenge to democracy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_panel = 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1385 |
33.1% |
0.33094385 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1199 |
28.6% |
0.28649940 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
617 |
14.7% |
0.14743130 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
510 |
12.2% |
0.12186380 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
143 |
3.4% |
0.03416965 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
135 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
93 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
103 |
2.5% |
0.02461171 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5975 |
|
NA |
r24_tesce_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r24_tesce]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r24_panel = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4146] [Invalid:6014]
[Range:1-27]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Your fitness app indicates that you are overweight. An online pharmacy buys this
information and offers you slimming pills. You take the pills and get chronic
diarrhoea. |
130 |
3.1% |
0.03135552 |
| 2 |
You have attended a sex party. A criminal network hacks the list of participants
and threatens to publish it. They expose you to blackmail, which causes you
psychological stress. |
160 |
3.9% |
0.03859141 |
| 3 |
You have a sexually transmitted disease. A friend accidentally shares this
online, which results in your partner hitting you. |
169 |
4.1% |
0.04076218 |
| 4 |
On your birthday, a friend shares a video of you being drunk on social media.
Your boss sees the video and you lose potential bonuses because you have
behaved unprofessionally. Due to your loss of income, you experience financial
challenges. |
147 |
3.5% |
0.03545586 |
| 5 |
A fitness app tracks your physiological state of health and advises you to
buy expensive dietary supplements in order to improve your health. You buy the
supplements, but it turns out that your health does not improve and that you
wasted your money. |
152 |
3.7% |
0.03666184 |
| 6 |
A friend tags your geographical location in a social media post which shows
that you are not at home. Your colleagues and your boss see this and are angry
because you had called in sick. You experience being ostracised at work. |
144 |
3.5% |
0.03473227 |
| 7 |
You tick off your sexual orientation on a dating app. Based on this information,
the app exposes you to advertising about rapid HIV testing. This really upsets
you. |
157 |
3.8% |
0.03786782 |
| 8 |
You buy a smartphone online for NOK 10,000 using your credit card. The online
store turns out to be a scam and you never receive the mobile you ordered, nor
do you get your money back. |
163 |
3.9% |
0.03931500 |
| 9 |
An advertising company picks up your political views from social media and sends
you advertisements for products which relate to your party. You spend a lot of
money on the products. |
145 |
3.5% |
0.03497347 |
| 10 |
Family members tag you in photos taken at a religious event. Your friends avoid
inviting you to social gatherings and parties because of your religious beliefs. |
143 |
3.4% |
0.03449108 |
| 11 |
You buy books from an online bookstore without being aware that you have left
behind your credit card information. This involves consenting to their 12-month
book club subscription, which costs £250 per month. |
151 |
3.6% |
0.03642065 |
| 12 |
You buy products from an online store in order to support a political party.
Without being aware of it, you agree to be used in advertisements. This results
in you being physically harassed by voters from another party. |
154 |
3.7% |
0.03714424 |
| 13 |
You tap “shall” on a social media pride event which anyone can see. A criminal
group identifies the names on the list of participants and beats you up. |
164 |
4.0% |
0.03955620 |
| 14 |
In a messaging app, you tell a colleague about how your anxiety disorder affects
your home office efficiency. One of your colleagues takes a screenshot of the
chat and sends it to your boss, resulting in a reduced position and salary. |
159 |
3.8% |
0.03835022 |
| 15 |
A criminal hacker gets hold of information about your health and threatens to
publish the fact that you have a serious hereditary disease. You feel helpless
and don't know how to avoid such disclosure. |
162 |
3.9% |
0.03907381 |
| 16 |
You change your marital status on Facebook and tag your same-sex
boyfriend/girlfriend. One of your friends on Facebook has strong opinions about
homosexuality and hits you the next time you meet them in the street. |
138 |
3.3% |
0.03328509 |
| 17 |
An advertising agency exploits a close-up of you in its advertising campaign.
You did not want that to happen and become very upset. |
148 |
3.6% |
0.03569706 |
| 18 |
Criminal hackers get hold of information indicating that you have a sexually
transmitted disease. They threaten to share this information if you do not pay
NOK 10,000. You pay. |
156 |
3.8% |
0.03762663 |
| 19 |
You feel a lump on your neck and search for information about it online. In
order to read the information you have to consent to cookies. Later on you are
swamped with advertisements for cancer treatment, which makes you makes you
stressed about the lump on your neck. |
174 |
4.2% |
0.04196816 |
| 20 |
You share your location on social media, which leads to your
ex-boyfriend/girlfriend seeking you out. Your ex-boyfriend/girlfriend is
aggressive and you twist your ankle as you are running away from the place. |
145 |
3.5% |
0.03497347 |
| 21 |
You share your location on social media showing that you are away on holiday.
A burglar sees this and breaks into your house. You return home early from your
holiday and are attacked and injured by the burglar. |
148 |
3.6% |
0.03569706 |
| 22 |
You lend a streaming service to a friend. The friend concerned spends NOK 500 on
purchasing films and the money will be deducted from your bank account. |
167 |
4.0% |
0.04027979 |
| 23 |
You enter your address on a fitness app. Without your consent, the company sends
you a free supply of dietary supplements. You take three of them, resulting in
nausea and vomiting for three days. |
135 |
3.3% |
0.03256151 |
| 24 |
Based on identifying information that you have shared on your open social media
account, someone creates an account pretending to be you. You are desperate and
don't know what to do about it. |
150 |
3.6% |
0.03617945 |
| 25 |
You tell a friend that you/your partner is pregnant and that person tags you in
social media pregnancy posts. This causes a lot of speculation among friends and
family, resulting in stress. |
158 |
3.8% |
0.03810902 |
| 26 |
You share your sexual preferences with a friend on a messaging app. A criminal
hacks the app and threatens to share the messages unless you pay NOK 10,000. You
pay. |
167 |
4.0% |
0.04027979 |
| 27 |
A criminal hacks the online pharmaceuticals system, gains access to your
prescriptions and collects your medication. This results in you being unable to
take your medication in time and you become seriously ill. |
160 |
3.9% |
0.03859141 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6014 |
|
NA |
r24_tesce
|
Variable label:
|
l[r24_tesce_ran]: Imagine that you are the person in the description.
How negative would it be if that happened to you?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
I[r24_tesce_ran]
Imagine that you are the person in the description:
|
|
Literal question:
|
How negative would it be if that happened to you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r24_panel = 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - (0) Not at all negative |
97 |
2.3% |
0.02296945 |
| 1 |
1 |
52 |
1.2% |
0.01231352 |
| 2 |
2 |
94 |
2.2% |
0.02225906 |
| 3 |
3 |
111 |
2.6% |
0.02628463 |
| 4 |
4 |
80 |
1.9% |
0.01894388 |
| 5 |
5 |
235 |
5.6% |
0.05564764 |
| 6 |
6 |
172 |
4.1% |
0.04072934 |
| 7 |
7 |
336 |
8.0% |
0.07956429 |
| 8 |
8 |
631 |
14.9% |
0.14941984 |
| 9 |
9 |
489 |
11.6% |
0.11579446 |
| 10 |
10 - Very negative (10) |
1793 |
42.5% |
0.42457968 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
133 |
3.1% |
0.03149420 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5937 |
|
NA |
r24_avslutt
|
Variable label:
|
Closing comments
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10160]
[Range:-]
|
r24_P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
5206 |
51.2% |
0.5124016 |
| 2 |
Female |
4954 |
48.8% |
0.4875984 |
r24_P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
1610 |
15.8% |
0.15846457 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
3736 |
36.8% |
0.36771654 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
504 |
5.0% |
0.04960630 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
2787 |
27.4% |
0.27431102 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
785 |
7.7% |
0.07726378 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
738 |
7.3% |
0.07263780 |
r24_P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:3-54]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
1610 |
15.8% |
0.15846457 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
943 |
9.3% |
0.09281496 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
424 |
4.2% |
0.04173228 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
355 |
3.5% |
0.03494094 |
| 30 |
Viken |
2363 |
23.3% |
0.23257874 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
582 |
5.7% |
0.05728346 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
791 |
7.8% |
0.07785433 |
| 42 |
Agder |
504 |
5.0% |
0.04960630 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
1420 |
14.0% |
0.13976378 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
785 |
7.7% |
0.07726378 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
383 |
3.8% |
0.03769685 |
r24_P3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Constituencies parliament election 2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10139] [Invalid:21]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Østfold |
489 |
4.8% |
0.048229608 |
| 1 |
Akershus |
1429 |
14.1% |
0.140940921 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
1609 |
15.9% |
0.158694151 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
310 |
3.1% |
0.030575007 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
270 |
2.7% |
0.026629845 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
441 |
4.3% |
0.043495414 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
507 |
5.0% |
0.050004931 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
282 |
2.8% |
0.027813394 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
184 |
1.8% |
0.018147746 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
318 |
3.1% |
0.031364040 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
941 |
9.3% |
0.092809942 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
1248 |
12.3% |
0.123089062 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
168 |
1.7% |
0.016569681 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
424 |
4.2% |
0.041818720 |
| 16 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
629 |
6.2% |
0.062037676 |
| 15 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
153 |
1.5% |
0.015090246 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
354 |
3.5% |
0.034914686 |
| 18 |
Troms |
284 |
2.8% |
0.028010652 |
| 19 |
Finnmark |
99 |
1.0% |
0.009764277 |
| Sysmiss |
|
21 |
|
NA |
r24_P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
471 |
4.6% |
0.04635827 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
3017 |
29.7% |
0.29694882 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
6497 |
63.9% |
0.63946850 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
175 |
1.7% |
0.01722441 |
r24_P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
22 |
0.2% |
0.002165354 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
449 |
4.4% |
0.044192913 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
907 |
8.9% |
0.089271654 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1172 |
11.5% |
0.115354331 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
937 |
9.2% |
0.092224409 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
827 |
8.1% |
0.081397638 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2136 |
21.0% |
0.210236220 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
729 |
7.2% |
0.071751969 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
742 |
7.3% |
0.073031496 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1793 |
17.6% |
0.176476378 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
270 |
2.7% |
0.026574803 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
125 |
1.2% |
0.012303150 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
0.5% |
0.005019685 |
r24_P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
241 |
2.4% |
0.02372047 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
1705 |
16.8% |
0.16781496 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
2635 |
25.9% |
0.25935039 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
2287 |
22.5% |
0.22509843 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
1549 |
15.2% |
0.15246063 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
1026 |
10.1% |
0.10098425 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
717 |
7.1% |
0.07057087 |
r24_P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
4581 |
45.1% |
0.45088583 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
4862 |
47.9% |
0.47854331 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
717 |
7.1% |
0.07057087 |
r24_Weight1_stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, and age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation
report.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-0]
|
r24_Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, and age. See documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-13]
|
r24_Weight2_stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, P4_1, and age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation
report.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9985] [Invalid:175]
[Range:0-0]
|
r24_Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1, and age. See documentation
report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-45]
|
r24_Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10160] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-5]
|
