Codebook

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Round 25

v-102 - 2023-11-06









Produced by ideas2evidence










Citation

Primary investigators

Name Affiliation
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten UiB
Stefan Dahlberg UiB
Sina Storelv UiB
Erla Løvseth UiB
Lise Lund Bjånesøy UiB
Hege Høivik Bye UiB
Gisela Böhm UiB
Anne Lise Fimreite UiB
Thea Gregersen NORCE
Erik Knudsen UiB
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø NORCE
Arjan Schakel UiB
Endre Tvinnereim UiB

Coordinating team

Name
Erla Løvseth
Sina Storelv

Producers

Name Affiliation Role
Øivind Skjervheim ideas2evidence Coordinator
Olav Bjørnebekk ideas2evidence Project team member
Joachim Wettergreen ideas2evidence Project team member
Asle Høgestøl ideas2evidence Quality assurance

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no

Scope

Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Universe: Norwegian Citizens 18 years or older.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in the following waves:

Round Sample size Recruited
1 25 000 4 870
3 25 000 5 623
8 22 000 4 245
11 14 000 2 069
14 14 000 2 036
16 34 000 5 163
18 14 000 2 048
22 23 000 3 221
25 18 000 2 405

All samples are drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.

The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.

Mode of Data Collection

The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from previous waves: https://nsd.no/nsddata/serier/norsk_medborgerpanel_eng.html

In wave 25, emails were sent out on 31st of October, 2022.

An email with reminder was sent out three times; November 4th, November 10th, and November 17th, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message. Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by email.

New respondents drawn from the population registry were invited by post 31st of October. A postcard was distributed 14th of November to those above the age of 60, and those under 60 not enlisted with a telephone number. The counterparts enlisted with telephonenumber received a text message on November 17th. The reminders was sendt to respondents who had not accessed or completed the survey.

Wave 25 ended on the 28th of November 2022.

Weighting

To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different strata are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire.

Two different weights have been calculated:

When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weights are calculated using the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized) sub-groups, which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group compared to the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, variable columns are included in the dataset that indicates the proportion size of strata in the population.

Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.


Change Log

Version Release date / Date changed Variable Changes and notes
v-102 2023-11-06 NA Revised release of round 25
NA 2023-10-25 r25_Weight4 New variable: Added r25_Weight4
NA 2023-10-25 r25_Weight4 Variable documentation inserted
v-102 2023-10-25 NA Revised release of round 25
NA 2023-08-30 r25_bgedu Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-08-30 r25_pcvot21 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-06-27 r25_pcsaf Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-03-28 r25_bgupc New variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years of age, based on registered municipality in r25_bgupm
NA 2023-03-28 r25_bgupc Variable documentation inserted
v-101 2023-02-03 NA Revised release of round 25
NA 2023-02-02 r25_dvrepx1 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_dvrepx2 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_dvrepx3 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_dvrepx4 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_dvrepx5 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_dvrepx6 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_dvrepx7 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_dvrepx8 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_dveas Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_dvcas Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_lisatx1 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_cerenx_1b_ran Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_cerenx_2_ran1 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_cerenx_2_ran2 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_cerenx_3_ran1 Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_cerenx_wording Variable documentation updated
NA 2023-02-02 r25_cerenx_t_order Variable documentation updated
v-100 2022-12-16 NA Initial release of round 25


Dataset contents

File name Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 25 - v-102-O.sav
Distribution type Public
# Cases 13740
# Variables 382


Variable Documentation

responseid


Variable label: responseid
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r25_rekruttert


Variable label: The wave the respondent was recruited
Technical description: The wave the respondent was recruited
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-25]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Wave 1 1489 10.8% 0.10836972
3 Wave 3 1612 11.7% 0.11732169
8 Wave 8 1456 10.6% 0.10596798
11 Wave 11 822 6.0% 0.05982533
14 Wave 14 852 6.2% 0.06200873
16 Wave 16 2316 16.9% 0.16855895
18 Wave 18 953 6.9% 0.06935953
22 Wave 22 1835 13.4% 0.13355167
25 Wave 25 2405 17.5% 0.17503639


r25_group


Variable label: Subgroup in wave 25. Assigned at random, with the exception of group 6 which is reserved for r25_rekruttert = 25.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group 1 2204 16.0% 0.1604076
2 Group 2 2245 16.3% 0.1633916
3 Group 3 2276 16.6% 0.1656477
4 Group 4 2336 17.0% 0.1700146
5 Group 5 2274 16.6% 0.1655022
6 Group 6 2405 17.5% 0.1750364


r25_panel_1


Variable label: Whether the respondent belongs to the group which was exposed to [r25_hecor], [r25_hecob], and [r25_hecvax]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1802] [Invalid:11938] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Was asked [r25_hecor], [r25_hecob], and [r25_hecvax] 1802 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 11938 NA


r25_panel_2


Variable label: Whether the respondent belongs to the group which was exposed to [r25_dvshpx]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1750] [Invalid:11990] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Was asked [r25_dvshpx] 1750 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 11990 NA


r25_interview_start


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical description: [Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r25_interview_end


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical description: [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12921] [Invalid:819] [Range:-]



r25_browsertype


Variable label: Browertype used by respondent
Technical description: Browertype used by respondent
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r25_browserversion


Variable label: Browser version used by respondent
Technical description: Browser version used by respondent
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r25_mobil


Variable label: Determines if the respondents uses mobile
Technical description: Determines if the respondents uses mobile
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Other 7087 51.6% 0.5157933
1 Mobile 6653 48.4% 0.4842067


r25_opplosning


Variable label: Screen resolution of the applied device
Technical description: Screen resolution of the applied device
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r25_enhetstype


Variable label: Determines respondents device type
Technical description: Determines respondents device type
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 PC 7087 51.6% 0.515793304
2 Touch 6582 47.9% 0.479039301
3 Generic 71 0.5% 0.005167394


r25_advancedwifeaturesenabled


Variable label: Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
Technical description: Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r25_getrenderingmode


Variable label: Detects the browsers rendering mode
Technical description: Detects the browsers rendering mode
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r25_cecmo


Variable label: What do you think when you hear or read the term “climate change”?
Literal question: What do you think when you hear or read the term “climate change”?
Post-question: Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you prefer.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_cewinx_ran1


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent is exposed to [r25_cewinx1] or [r25_cewinx2]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2242] [Invalid:11498] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Exposed to r25cewinx1 1136 50.7% 0.5066905
2 Exposed to r25cewinx2 1106 49.3% 0.4933095
Sysmiss 11498 NA


r25_cewinx_ran2


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cewinx1] and [r25_cewinx2]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2242] [Invalid:11498] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 onshore 1117 49.8% 0.4982159
2 offshore 1125 50.2% 0.5017841
Sysmiss 11498 NA


r25_cewinx1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: More wind power should be developed [r25_cewinx_ran2] in Norway.
Pre-question text: Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
Literal question: More [r25_cewinx_ran2] should be developed in Norway
Technical description: [Asked if r25cewinx_ran1 = 1 & r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 174 15.3% 0.15316901
2 Agree 309 27.2% 0.27200704
3 Agree somewhat 239 21.0% 0.21038732
4 Neither agree nor disagree 81 7.1% 0.07130282
5 Disagree somewhat 98 8.6% 0.08626761
6 Disagree 113 9.9% 0.09947183
7 Strongly disagree 122 10.7% 0.10739437
97 Not answered 0 0.0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 12604 NA


r25_cewinx2


Variable label: Your assessment: A majority or minority in Norway who believe that more [r25_cewinx_ran2] wind power should be developed in Norway
Pre-question text: What is your assessment:
Literal question: Is there a majority or minority in Norway who believe that more [r25_cewinx_ran2] wind power should be developed in Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r25cewinx_ran1 = 2 & r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A majority 475 42.9% 0.429475588
2 A minority 623 56.3% 0.563291139
97 Not answered 8 0.7% 0.007233273
98 Not asked 12634 NA


r25_dvshpx_ran1


Variable label: Experiment: Assigns the same element for textpiping as in wave 24, based on [r24_dvshaxran1]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25panel_2 = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1750] [Invalid:11990] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Muslim women, however, refused to shake hands with politicians who were men 860 49.1% 0.4914286
2 Muslim men, however, refused to shake hands with politicians who were women 890 50.9% 0.5085714
Sysmiss 11990 NA


r25_dvshpx_ran2


Variable label: Experiment: Assigns the same element for textpiping as in wave 24, based on [r24_dvshaxran2]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25panel_2 = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1750] [Invalid:11990] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 BLANK 893 51.0% 0.5102857
2 Instead they put their hand on their heart as a greeting. 857 49.0% 0.4897143
Sysmiss 11990 NA


r25_dvshpx


Variable label: Your assessment: A majority or minority in Norway in favour of local politicans requested that everyone have to shake hands
Pre-question text: Imagine that some local politicians were invited by a local Muslim community centre to attend their annual spring festival. When they arrived the local politicians put out their hands to greet their hosts. [r25_dvshpx_ran1]. [r25_dvshpx_ran2] After the meeting, some of those who had attended expressed their discomfort about the situation and requested that all the participants should shake hands the next time
Literal question: What is your assessment: Is there a majority or minority in Norway in favour of local politicians making such a request?
Technical description: [Asked if r25panel_2 = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A majority 767 43.8% 0.438285714
2 A minority 966 55.2% 0.552000000
97 Not answered 17 1.0% 0.009714286
98 Not asked 11990 NA


r25_liint


Variable label: Norwegian or english: language the respondent indicated they would be able to respond in
Pre-question text: The next part of the survey is part of an international study where we would like to ask some of the participants some questions in English. Exactly who will be asked these questions is a random decision.
Literal question: Would you like to answer some questions in English if you are picked for this group?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes, I can answer some questions in English 1657 73.8% 0.738084633
2 No, I don't want any questions in English 576 25.7% 0.256570156
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.005345212
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_li_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Selects what questions the respondent will be exposed to starting with [r25_lihap] and [r25_lisat], dependent on answer given in [r25_liint]
Technical description: [Experiment. Conditonal randomisation if the respondent was exposed to Norwegian or English versions of the questions. If [r25_li_ran] == 1 it was randomised across Norwegian and English versions. If [r25_li_ran] == 2 | 3 | 4 it was randomised between Norwegian versions of the questions.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2242] [Invalid:11498] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Exposed to lihapx & lisatx 701 31.3% 0.3126673
2 Exposed to lihapx1 & lisatx1 419 18.7% 0.1868867
3 Exposed to lihapx2 & lisatx2 692 30.9% 0.3086530
4 Exposed to lihapx3 & lisatx3 430 19.2% 0.1917930
Sysmiss 11498 NA


r25_lihapx


Variable label: How happy would you say you are?
Literal question: Taking all things together, how happy would you say you are?
Technical description: Order of [r25lihapx] and [r25lisatx] is randomized.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very happy 115 16.4% 0.164051355
2 Rather happy 468 66.8% 0.667617689
3 Not very happy 106 15.1% 0.151212553
4 Not at all happy 5 0.7% 0.007132668
97 Not answered 7 1.0% 0.009985735
98 Not asked 13039 NA


r25_lisatx


Variable label: How satisfied are you with your life?
Literal question: All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole nowadays?
Post-question: Questions for the international study on luck and satisfaction are now concluded, and the survey will continue to other themes.
Technical description: Order of [r25lihapx] and [r25lisatx] is randomized.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 154 22.0% 0.219686163
2 Rather satisfied 463 66.0% 0.660485021
3 Not very satisfied 71 10.1% 0.101283880
4 Not at all satisfied 7 1.0% 0.009985735
97 Not answered 6 0.9% 0.008559201
98 Not asked 13039 NA


r25_lihapx1


Variable label: How happy would you say you are?
Literal question: Taking all things together, how happy would you say you are?
Technical description: Order of [r25lihapx1] and [r25lisatx1] is randomized.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very happy 92 22.0% 0.219570406
2 Rather happy 278 66.3% 0.663484487
3 Not very happy 40 9.5% 0.095465394
4 Not at all happy 6 1.4% 0.014319809
97 Not answered 3 0.7% 0.007159905
98 Not asked 13321 NA


r25_lisatx1


Variable label: How satisfied are you with your life?
Literal question: All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole nowadays?
Post-question: Questions for the international study on luck and satisfaction are now concluded, and the survey will continue to other themes.
Technical description: Order of [r25lihapx1] and [r25lisatx1] is randomized.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 118 28.2% 0.281622912
2 Rather satisfied 247 58.9% 0.589498807
3 Not very satisfied 44 10.5% 0.105011933
4 Not at all satisfied 7 1.7% 0.016706444
97 Not answered 3 0.7% 0.007159905
98 Not asked 13321 NA


r25_lihapx2


Variable label: How happy would you say you are?
Literal question: Taking all things together, how happy would you say you are?
Technical description: Order of [r25lihapx2] and [r25lisatx2] is randomized.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Extremely unhappy 3 0.4% 0.004335260
1 1 2 0.3% 0.002890173
2 2 5 0.7% 0.007225434
3 3 20 2.9% 0.028901734
4 4 36 5.2% 0.052023121
5 5 88 12.7% 0.127167630
6 6 92 13.3% 0.132947977
7 7 162 23.4% 0.234104046
8 8 186 26.9% 0.268786127
9 9 72 10.4% 0.104046243
10 10 - Extremely happy 19 2.7% 0.027456647
97 Not answered 7 1.0% 0.010115607
98 Not asked 13048 NA


r25_lisatx2


Variable label: How satisfied are you with your life?
Literal question: All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole nowadays?
Post-question: Questions for the international study on luck and satisfaction are now concluded, and the survey will continue to other themes.
Technical description: Order of [r25lihapx2] and [r25lisatx2] is randomized.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Extremely dissatisfied 4 0.6% 0.005780347
1 1 3 0.4% 0.004335260
2 2 4 0.6% 0.005780347
3 3 18 2.6% 0.026011561
4 4 31 4.5% 0.044797688
5 5 78 11.3% 0.112716763
6 6 90 13.0% 0.130057803
7 7 163 23.6% 0.235549133
8 8 196 28.3% 0.283236994
9 9 70 10.1% 0.101156069
10 10 - Extremely satisfied 26 3.8% 0.037572254
97 Not answered 9 1.3% 0.013005780
98 Not asked 13048 NA


r25_lihapx3


Variable label: How happy would you say you are?
Literal question: Taking all things together, how happy would you say you are?
Technical description: Order of [r25lihapx3] and [r25lisatx3] is randomized.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Extremely unhappy 1 0.2% 0.002325581
1 1 0 0.0% 0.000000000
2 2 5 1.2% 0.011627907
3 3 10 2.3% 0.023255814
4 4 10 2.3% 0.023255814
5 5 30 7.0% 0.069767442
6 6 63 14.7% 0.146511628
7 7 111 25.8% 0.258139535
8 8 130 30.2% 0.302325581
9 9 56 13.0% 0.130232558
10 10 - Extremely happy 12 2.8% 0.027906977
97 Not answered 2 0.5% 0.004651163
98 Not asked 13310 NA


r25_lisatx3


Variable label: How satisfied are you with your life as a whole nowadays?
Literal question: All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole nowadays?
Post-question: Questions for the international study on luck and satisfaction are now concluded, and the survey will continue to other themes.
Technical description: Order of [r25lihapx3] and [r25lisatx3] is randomized.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Extremely dissatisfied 0 0.0% 0.000000000
1 1 2 0.5% 0.004651163
2 2 6 1.4% 0.013953488
3 3 16 3.7% 0.037209302
4 4 8 1.9% 0.018604651
5 5 32 7.4% 0.074418605
6 6 55 12.8% 0.127906977
7 7 88 20.5% 0.204651163
8 8 149 34.7% 0.346511628
9 9 54 12.6% 0.125581395
10 10 - Extremely satisfied 18 4.2% 0.041860465
97 Not answered 2 0.5% 0.004651163
98 Not asked 13310 NA


r25_dvcrmx_ran1


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvcrmx_ran2]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2242] [Invalid:11498] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 criticise 765 34.1% 0.3412132
2 discuss 719 32.1% 0.3206958
3 preach 758 33.8% 0.3380910
Sysmiss 11498 NA


r25_dvcrmx_ran2


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects and element for textpiping in pre-question text to [r25_dvcrmx1] and [r25_dvcrmx2]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2242] [Invalid:11498] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A group of Muslims have asked to hire a local meeting hall in order to hold a meeting where they can [r25_dvcrmx_ran1] conservative ideas about bringing up children in the Islamic faith. 1145 51.1% 0.5107047
2 A group of Christians have asked to hire a local meeting hall in order to hold a meeting where they can [r25_dvcrmx_ran1] conservative Christian ideas about bringing up children. 1097 48.9% 0.4892953
Sysmiss 11498 NA


r25_dvcrmx1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Should they be allowed to rent the local meeting hall
Pre-question text: [r25_dvcrmx_ran2]
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be allowed to rent the local meeting hall?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Displayed on the same page as [r25_dvcrmx2]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 276 12.3% 0.122939866
2 Agree 615 27.4% 0.273942094
3 Agree somewhat 251 11.2% 0.111804009
4 Neither agree nor disagree 401 17.9% 0.178619154
5 Disagree somewhat 237 10.6% 0.105567929
6 Disagree 269 12.0% 0.119821826
7 Strongly disagree 191 8.5% 0.085077951
97 Not answered 5 0.2% 0.002227171
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvcrmx2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: the religious group poses a threat to Norwegian values
Pre-question text: [r25_dvcrmx_ran2]
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that the religious group described above poses a threat to Norwegian values?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Displayed on the same page as [r25_dvcrmx1]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 162 7.2% 0.072160356
2 Agree 329 14.7% 0.146547884
3 Agree somewhat 534 23.8% 0.237861915
4 Neither agree nor disagree 479 21.3% 0.213363029
5 Disagree somewhat 242 10.8% 0.107795100
6 Disagree 350 15.6% 0.155902004
7 Strongly disagree 134 6.0% 0.059688196
97 Not answered 15 0.7% 0.006681514
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvsmex_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvsmex]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2242] [Invalid:11498] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 should no longer serve meals containing meat in order to limit climate change. 251 11.2% 0.1119536
2 should serve more meals containing no meat in order to limit climate change. 253 11.3% 0.1128457
3 should serve more meals containing no meat in order to limit climate change. The cost per meal would then increase by up to NOK 10. 253 11.3% 0.1128457
4 should no longer serve meals containing pork in order to accommodate Muslim religious rules. 245 10.9% 0.1092774
5 should serve more meals not containing pork in order to accommodate Muslim religious rules. 246 11.0% 0.1097235
6 should serve more meals not containing pork in order to accommodate Muslim religious rules. The cost per meal would then increase by up to NOK 10. 275 12.3% 0.1226583
7 should no longer serve meals containing meat in order to accommodate different needs and preferences. 248 11.1% 0.1106155
8 should serve more meals containing no meat in order to accommodate different needs and preferences. 242 10.8% 0.1079393
9 should serve more meals containing no meat in order to accommodate different needs and preferences. The cost per meal would then increase by up to NOK 10. 229 10.2% 0.1021409
Sysmiss 11498 NA


r25_dvsmex


Variable label: In favour for/opposed to: It has been proposed that public canteens [r25_dvsmex_ran]
Pre-question text: It has been proposed that public canteens [r25_dvsmex_ran]
Literal question: To what extent are you in favour of or opposed to this proposal?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely in favour 464 20.7% 0.20668151
2 Somewhat in favour 609 27.1% 0.27126949
3 Somewhat opposed 441 19.6% 0.19643653
4 Completely opposed 717 31.9% 0.31937639
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.00623608
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvhodx_ran1


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvhodx]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2241] [Invalid:11499] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 International Women's Day 1055 47.1% 0.470772
2 A Muslim public holiday 1186 52.9% 0.529228
Sysmiss 11499 NA


r25_dvhodx_ran2


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvhodx]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2241] [Invalid:11499] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 BLANK 569 25.4% 0.2539045
2 Some experts argue that this would have a positive impact on the economy because people spend more money on their days off. 553 24.7% 0.2467648
3 Some experts argue that this would have a negative impact on the economy because people work less. 563 25.1% 0.2512271
4 The new public holiday would replace one of the days off associated with a Christian holiday. 556 24.8% 0.2481035
Sysmiss 11499 NA


r25_dvhodx


Variable label: In favour for/opposed to: [r25_dvhodx_ran1] is made a new public holiday for everyone
Pre-question text:

Think about the following proposal:

[r25_dvhodx_ran1] is made a new public holiday for everyone. [r25_dvhodx_ran2]
Literal question: To what extent are you in favour of or opposed to this proposal?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely in favour 229 10.2% 0.10200445
2 Somewhat in favour 402 17.9% 0.17906459
3 Somewhat opposed 559 24.9% 0.24899777
4 Completely opposed 1027 45.7% 0.45746102
97 Not answered 28 1.2% 0.01247216
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvnmox_ran1


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvnmox]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2239] [Invalid:11501] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 BLANK 750 33.5% 0.3349710
2 Their present one is small and run-down. 745 33.3% 0.3327378
3 The one they have is similar to this one: [image] 744 33.2% 0.3322912
Sysmiss 11501 NA


r25_dvnmox_ran2


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvnmox]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2239] [Invalid:11501] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 BLANK 736 32.9% 0.3287182
2 The new mosque would have a bit more space and be more presentable. 766 34.2% 0.3421170
3 The new mosque would resemble this one: [image] 737 32.9% 0.3291648
Sysmiss 11501 NA


r25_dvnmox


Variable label: In favour for/opposed to: a local muslim association proposes building a new mosque
Pre-question text:

A local Muslim association proposes building a new mosque.

[r25_dvnmox_ran1]

[r25_dvnmox_ran2]
Literal question: To what extent are you in favour of or opposed to building a new mosque?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely in favour 512 22.8% 0.22806236
2 Somewhat in favour 843 37.6% 0.37550111
3 Somewhat opposed 487 21.7% 0.21692650
4 Completely opposed 376 16.7% 0.16748330
97 Not answered 27 1.2% 0.01202673
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvfinx_ran1


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvfinx]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2238] [Invalid:11502] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Christian 1177 52.6% 0.525916
2 Muslim 1061 47.4% 0.474084
Sysmiss 11502 NA


r25_dvfinx_ran2


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvfinx]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2238] [Invalid:11502] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 no formal education 1113 49.7% 0.497319
2 university education 1125 50.3% 0.502681
Sysmiss 11502 NA


r25_dvfinx_ran3


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvfinx]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2238] [Invalid:11502] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 He is not religious, never attends a [r25_dvfinx_pipe1] and never prays at home. 753 33.6% 0.3364611
2 He is religious, attends a [r25_dvfinx_pipe1] and prays at home. 728 32.5% 0.3252904
3 He is very religious and believes that there is only a correct interpretation of [r25_dvfinxpipe2] and that is more important to him than Norwegian laws. 757 33.8% 0.3382484
Sysmiss 11502 NA


r25_dvfinx


Variable label: Cold/hot feelings: Immigrants from Syria
Pre-question text:

We are now interested in what you think about immigrants.

Consider an immigrant from Syria who is a 30-year-old [r25_dvfinx_ran1] man. He has [r25_dvfinx_ran2]. [r25_dvfinx_ran3]
Literal question: Please state below how hot or cold your feelings are when you hear about this man.
Post-question: Placing the arrow between 50 and 100 degrees indicates that you generally have warm feelings. Placing the arrow between 0 and 50 degrees indicates that you generally have cold feelings. If you have neither hot nor cold feelings, you can place the arrow at 50 degrees.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[The respondent registered their answer by using a slider]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2168] [Invalid:11572] [Range:0-100]



r25_cehow


Variable label: Level of worry that extreme weather or the consequences of climate change will cause damage to your home
Pre-question text: Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
Literal question: Are you worried that extreme weather or the consequences of climate change will cause damage to your home?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all concerned 913 40.7% 0.40668151
2 Slightly concerned 1044 46.5% 0.46503341
3 Fairly concerned 187 8.3% 0.08329621
4 Very concerned 87 3.9% 0.03875278
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.00623608
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_ceres_1


Variable label: Responsible for protecting us from future consequences of climate change: The municipalities
Pre-question text: Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
Literal question: The municipalities
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Pre-question text was highlighet in gray for the respondent.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1338 59.6% 0.59599109
0 Not selected 893 39.8% 0.39777283
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.00623608
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_ceres_2


Variable label: Responsible for protecting us from future consequences of climate change: The state
Pre-question text: Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
Literal question: The state
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Pre-question text was highlighet in gray for the respondent.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1986 88.5% 0.88463252
0 Not selected 245 10.9% 0.10913140
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.00623608
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_ceres_3


Variable label: Responsible for protecting us from future consequences of climate change: Private trade and industry
Pre-question text: Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
Literal question: Private trade and industry
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Pre-question text was highlighet in gray for the respondent.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 699 31.1% 0.31135857
0 Not selected 1532 68.2% 0.68240535
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.00623608
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_ceres_4


Variable label: Responsible for protecting us from future consequences of climate change: Private households
Pre-question text: Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
Literal question: Private households
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Pre-question text was highlighet in gray for the respondent.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 848 37.8% 0.37772829
0 Not selected 1383 61.6% 0.61603563
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.00623608
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_ceres_5


Variable label: Responsible for protecting us from future consequences of climate change: NGOs
Pre-question text: Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
Literal question: NGOs
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Pre-question text was highlighet in gray for the respondent.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 271 12.1% 0.12071269
0 Not selected 1960 87.3% 0.87305122
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.00623608
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_ceres_6


Variable label: Responsible for protecting us from future consequences of climate change: Don’t know
Pre-question text: Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
Literal question: Don’t know
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Pre-question text was highlighet in gray for the respondent.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 113 5.0% 0.05033408
0 Not selected 2118 94.3% 0.94342984
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.00623608
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_bghom


Variable label: What is your living situation?
Literal question: What is your living situation?
Post-question: In this context we are thinking about your primary residence.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I live in a detached house 1218 54.3% 0.54253898
2 I live in semi-detached/multi-family house, terraced house or another type of small house 482 21.5% 0.21469933
3 I live in a block of flats 479 21.3% 0.21336303
4 Other: 45 2.0% 0.02004454
97 Not answered 21 0.9% 0.00935412
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_bghom_4_other


Variable label: Other: What is your living situation?
Literal question: Other: What is your living situation?
Post-question: In this context we are thinking about your primary residence.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bghow_1


Variable label: Own or rent primary residence: I own my home, in full or in part
Literal question: I own my home, in full or in part
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1984 88.4% 0.88374165
0 Not selected 247 11.0% 0.11002227
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.00623608
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_bghow_2


Variable label: Own or rent primary residence: I am renting my home
Literal question: I am renting my home
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 192 8.6% 0.08552339
0 Not selected 2039 90.8% 0.90824053
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.00623608
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_bghow_3


Variable label: Own or rent primary residence: Other:
Literal question: Other:
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 47 2.1% 0.02093541
0 Not selected 2184 97.3% 0.97282851
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.00623608
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_bghow_3_other


Variable label: Own or rent primary residence: Other:
Literal question: Other:
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_cewme


Variable label: Agree/disagree: you can take measures that help protect yourself and your property against the consequences of climate change
Pre-question text: Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that you can take measures that help protect yourself and your property against the consequences of climate change?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 338 15.1% 0.150556793
2 Agree 731 32.6% 0.325612472
3 Agree somewhat 597 26.6% 0.265924276
4 Neither agree nor disagree 305 13.6% 0.135857461
5 Disagree somewhat 93 4.1% 0.041425390
6 Disagree 122 5.4% 0.054342984
7 Strongly disagree 40 1.8% 0.017817372
97 Not answered 19 0.8% 0.008463252
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_ceome_1


Variable label: Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water: Not relevant to my housing situation
Pre-question text:

Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.

We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water.
Literal question: Not relevant to my housing situation
Post-question: Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your choice of measures.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 599 29.3% 0.293483586
0 Not selected 1438 70.5% 0.704556590
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001959824
98 Not asked 11699 NA


r25_ceome_2


Variable label: Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water: Information about my residential area being particularly vulnerable to flooding or storm water
Pre-question text:

Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.

We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water.
Literal question: Information about my residential area being particularly vulnerable to flooding or storm water
Post-question: Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your choice of measures.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 732 35.9% 0.358647722
0 Not selected 1305 63.9% 0.639392455
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001959824
98 Not asked 11699 NA


r25_ceome_3


Variable label: Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water: Information about the typical damage costs incurred by those affected by flooding or storm water
Pre-question text:

Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.

We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water.
Literal question: Information about the typical damage costs incurred by those affected by flooding or storm water
Post-question: Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your choice of measures.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 304 14.9% 0.148946595
0 Not selected 1733 84.9% 0.849093582
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001959824
98 Not asked 11699 NA


r25_ceome_4


Variable label: Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water: Information about what measures could be taken in order to reduce the risks
Pre-question text:

Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.

We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water.
Literal question: Information about what measures could be taken in order to reduce the risks
Post-question: Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your choice of measures.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1043 51.1% 0.511024008
0 Not selected 994 48.7% 0.487016169
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001959824
98 Not asked 11699 NA


r25_ceome_5


Variable label: Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water: The fact that the implementation of measures ensures better insurance terms
Pre-question text:

Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.

We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water.
Literal question: The fact that the implementation of measures ensures better insurance terms
Post-question: Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your choice of measures.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 628 30.8% 0.307692308
0 Not selected 1409 69.0% 0.690347869
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001959824
98 Not asked 11699 NA


r25_ceome_6


Variable label: Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water: Information about the cost of measures
Pre-question text:

Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.

We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water.
Literal question: Information about the cost of measures
Post-question: Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your choice of measures.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 575 28.2% 0.281724645
0 Not selected 1462 71.6% 0.716315532
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001959824
98 Not asked 11699 NA


r25_ceome_7


Variable label: Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water: Financial support schemes for measures
Pre-question text:

Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.

We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water.
Literal question: Financial support schemes for measures
Post-question: Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your choice of measures.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 832 40.8% 0.407643312
0 Not selected 1205 59.0% 0.590396864
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001959824
98 Not asked 11699 NA


r25_ceome_8


Variable label: Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water: I do not wish to implement such measures at my property
Pre-question text:

Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.

We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water.
Literal question: I do not wish to implement such measures at my property
Post-question: Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your choice of measures.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 41 2.0% 0.020088192
0 Not selected 1996 97.8% 0.977951984
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001959824
98 Not asked 11699 NA


r25_ceome_9


Variable label: Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water: Other:
Pre-question text:

Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.

We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water.
Literal question: Other:
Post-question: Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your choice of measures.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 44 2.2% 0.021558060
0 Not selected 1993 97.6% 0.976482117
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001959824
98 Not asked 11699 NA


r25_ceome_9_other


Variable label: Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water: Other:
Pre-question text:

Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.

We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water.
Literal question: Other:
Post-question: Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your choice of measures.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_ceome_10


Variable label: Measures to protect your property againts increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water: Don’t know
Pre-question text:

Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.

We are now going to focus on increased rainfall/snowfall, flooding and storm water.
Literal question: Don’t know
Post-question: Several answers are possible. If you have already implemented such measures, please select the alternatives that were decisive for your choice of measures.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_bghow_2 is the only selected alternative in r25_bghow]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 55 2.7% 0.026947575
0 Not selected 1982 97.1% 0.971092602
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001959824
98 Not asked 11699 NA


r25_dvgevx_ran1


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvgevx2] and [r25_dvgevx1]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2225] [Invalid:11515] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 a local group from the Progress Party (FrP) 1106 49.7% 0.4970787
2 the anti-Islamic group Stop the Islamisation of Norway (SIAN) 1119 50.3% 0.5029213
Sysmiss 11515 NA


r25_dvgevx_ran2


Variable label: Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dvgevx2] and [r25_dvgevx1]. Randomly selects an element if [r25_dvgevx_ran1] == 2. If [r25_dvgevx_ran1] == 1, element 1 or 3 is selected by random.
Technical description: [Experiment. If [r25_dvgevx_ran1] == 1 it was conditionally randomised between 1 and 3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2225] [Invalid:11515] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 criticise Islam 903 40.6% 0.4058427
2 provoke Muslims 363 16.3% 0.1631461
3 criticise conservative Islamic attitudes about homosexuality 959 43.1% 0.4310112
Sysmiss 11515 NA


r25_dvgevx2


Variable label: Like/dislike: [r25_dvgevx_ran1]
Pre-question text: Consider that [r25_dvgevx_ran1] wants to hold an event in order to [r25_dvgevx_ran2].
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike denne gruppen?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Displayed on the same page as [r25_dvgevx1]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely like 35 1.6% 0.01559020
2 Really like 65 2.9% 0.02895323
3 Like somewhat 137 6.1% 0.06102450
4 Neither like nor dislike 426 19.0% 0.18975501
5 Dislike somewhat 335 14.9% 0.14922049
6 Really dislike 484 21.6% 0.21559020
7 Intensely dislike 735 32.7% 0.32739421
97 Not answered 28 1.2% 0.01247216
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvgevx1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: [r25_dvgevx_ran1] should be allowed to hold the event about [r25_dvgevx_ran2]
Pre-question text: Consider that [r25_dvgevx_ran1] wants to hold an event in order to [r25_dvgevx_ran2].
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be allowed to do so?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Displayed on the same page as [r25_dvgevx2]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 224 10.0% 0.09977728
2 Agree 475 21.2% 0.21158129
3 Agree somewhat 363 16.2% 0.16169265
4 Neither agree nor disagree 341 15.2% 0.15189310
5 Disagree somewhat 253 11.3% 0.11269488
6 Disagree 274 12.2% 0.12204900
7 Strongly disagree 280 12.5% 0.12472160
97 Not answered 35 1.6% 0.01559020
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvmcs_1


Variable label: Good/bad proposal: Dramatically stricter sentences for criminals
Pre-question text: What is your opinion of the following proposals?
Literal question: Dramatically stricter sentences for criminals
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good proposal 432 19.2% 0.19242762
2 Fairly good proposal 662 29.5% 0.29487751
3 Neither a good nor a bad proposal 654 29.1% 0.29131403
4 Fairly bad proposal 346 15.4% 0.15412027
5 Very bad proposal 122 5.4% 0.05434298
97 Not answered 29 1.3% 0.01291759
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvmcs_2


Variable label: Good/bad proposal: Reserve more parental leave days for the father/co-mother
Pre-question text: What is your opinion of the following proposals?
Literal question: Reserve more parental leave days for the father/co-mother
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good proposal 144 6.4% 0.06414254
2 Fairly good proposal 431 19.2% 0.19198218
3 Neither a good nor a bad proposal 944 42.0% 0.42048998
4 Fairly bad proposal 428 19.1% 0.19064588
5 Very bad proposal 259 11.5% 0.11536748
97 Not answered 39 1.7% 0.01737194
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvmcs_3


Variable label: Good/bad proposal: Make more space for Christian cultural heritage in Norway
Pre-question text: What is your opinion of the following proposals?
Literal question: Make more space for Christian cultural heritage in Norway
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good proposal 242 10.8% 0.10779510
2 Fairly good proposal 500 22.3% 0.22271715
3 Neither a good nor a bad proposal 813 36.2% 0.36213808
4 Fairly bad proposal 417 18.6% 0.18574610
5 Very bad proposal 247 11.0% 0.11002227
97 Not answered 26 1.2% 0.01158129
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvmcs_4


Variable label: Good/bad proposal: Work for a multicultural society
Pre-question text: What is your opinion of the following proposals?
Literal question: Work for a multicultural society
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good proposal 617 27.5% 0.27483296
2 Fairly good proposal 872 38.8% 0.38841871
3 Neither a good nor a bad proposal 472 21.0% 0.21024499
4 Fairly bad proposal 180 8.0% 0.08017817
5 Very bad proposal 74 3.3% 0.03296214
97 Not answered 30 1.3% 0.01336303
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvmcs_5


Variable label: Good/bad proposal: Increase the carbon tax on petrol and diesel
Pre-question text: What is your opinion of the following proposals?
Literal question: Increase the carbon tax on petrol and diesel
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good proposal 229 10.2% 0.10200445
2 Fairly good proposal 428 19.1% 0.19064588
3 Neither a good nor a bad proposal 490 21.8% 0.21826281
4 Fairly bad proposal 563 25.1% 0.25077951
5 Very bad proposal 505 22.5% 0.22494432
97 Not answered 30 1.3% 0.01336303
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvtra1


Variable label: Which statement is closest to your own opinion
Literal question: Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them are quite correct?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Experiment. Random question order together with [r25_dvtra2], [r25_dvtra], [r25_dvtra4]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To understand the world, we need to free ourselves from established traditions 986 43.9% 0.43919822
2 Established traditions provide us with the wisdom needed to understand the world 1175 52.3% 0.52338530
97 Not answered 84 3.7% 0.03741648
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvtra2


Variable label: Which statement is closest to your own opinion
Literal question: Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them are quite correct?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Experiment. Random question order together with [r25_dvtra1], [r25_dvtra3], [r25_dvtra4]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 If an idea has been around for a long time, it probably needs to be updated 1283 57.1% 0.57149220
2 If an idea has been around for a long time, it probably contains wisdom 883 39.3% 0.39331849
97 Not answered 79 3.5% 0.03518931
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvtra3


Variable label: Which statement is closest to your own opinion
Literal question: Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them are quite correct?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Experiment. Random question order together with [r25_dvtra1], [r25_dvtra2], [r25_dvtra4]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The world is constantly changing, so we should adjust our views about what is the morally correct way of being 1500 66.8% 0.6681514
2 Even though the world is constantly changing, it would be wrong to adapt our views about what is the morally correct way of being 681 30.3% 0.3033408
97 Not answered 64 2.9% 0.0285078
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvtra4


Variable label: Which statement is closest to your own opinion
Literal question: Which statement is closest to your own opinion — even if none of them are quite correct?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Experiment. Random question order together with [r25_dvtra1], [r25_dvtra2], [r25_dvtra3]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Traditions are often not worth following because they are discriminatory towards unique peoples 384 17.1% 0.17104677
2 Traditions are often worth following because they connect us to our shared past 1792 79.8% 0.79821826
97 Not answered 69 3.1% 0.03073497
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvimc_1


Variable label: Describes you: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced towards immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced towards immigrants
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 523 23.3% 0.232962138
2 Well 848 37.8% 0.377728285
3 Somewhat well 393 17.5% 0.175055679
4 Neither well nor poorly 311 13.9% 0.138530067
5 Somewhat poorly 80 3.6% 0.035634744
6 Poorly 38 1.7% 0.016926503
7 Very poorly 19 0.8% 0.008463252
97 Not answered 33 1.5% 0.014699332
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvimc_2


Variable label: Describes you: I don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 575 25.6% 0.256124722
2 Well 795 35.4% 0.354120267
3 Somewhat well 333 14.8% 0.148329621
4 Neither well nor poorly 368 16.4% 0.163919822
5 Somewhat poorly 81 3.6% 0.036080178
6 Poorly 42 1.9% 0.018708241
7 Very poorly 17 0.8% 0.007572383
97 Not answered 34 1.5% 0.015144766
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvimc_3


Variable label: Describes you: I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 191 8.5% 0.08507795
2 Well 391 17.4% 0.17416481
3 Somewhat well 409 18.2% 0.18218263
4 Neither well nor poorly 708 31.5% 0.31536748
5 Somewhat poorly 192 8.6% 0.08552339
6 Poorly 212 9.4% 0.09443207
7 Very poorly 110 4.9% 0.04899777
97 Not answered 32 1.4% 0.01425390
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvimc_4


Variable label: Describes you: I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of my own convictions
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of my own convictions
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 468 20.8% 0.208463252
2 Well 867 38.6% 0.386191537
3 Somewhat well 413 18.4% 0.183964365
4 Neither well nor poorly 349 15.5% 0.155456570
5 Somewhat poorly 72 3.2% 0.032071269
6 Poorly 33 1.5% 0.014699332
7 Very poorly 12 0.5% 0.005345212
97 Not answered 31 1.4% 0.013808463
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvhsy_1


Variable label: How important these considerations are for your own views on immigration: Protecting people who are fleeing from their homeland.
Pre-question text: We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway. Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please consider how important each of these considerations is for your own views on immigration.
Literal question: Protecting people who are fleeing from their homeland.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 1019 45.4% 0.453897550
2 Important 845 37.6% 0.376391982
3 Somewhat important 291 13.0% 0.129621381
4 Not very important 47 2.1% 0.020935412
5 Not at all important 13 0.6% 0.005790646
97 Not answered 30 1.3% 0.013363029
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvhsy_2


Variable label: How important these considerations are for your own views on immigration: Securing labour for the Norwegian economy.
Pre-question text: We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway. Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please consider how important each of these considerations is for your own views on immigration.
Literal question: Securing labour for the Norwegian economy.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 499 22.2% 0.22227171
2 Important 1013 45.1% 0.45122494
3 Somewhat important 516 23.0% 0.22984410
4 Not very important 133 5.9% 0.05924276
5 Not at all important 38 1.7% 0.01692650
97 Not answered 46 2.0% 0.02048998
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvhsy_3


Variable label: How important these considerations are for your own views on immigration: Enriching cultural life of Norway.
Pre-question text: We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway. Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please consider how important each of these considerations is for your own views on immigration.
Literal question: Enriching cultural life of Norway.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 365 16.3% 0.16258352
2 Important 810 36.1% 0.36080178
3 Somewhat important 606 27.0% 0.26993318
4 Not very important 315 14.0% 0.14031180
5 Not at all important 104 4.6% 0.04632517
97 Not answered 45 2.0% 0.02004454
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvhsy_4


Variable label: How important these considerations are for your own views on immigration: Providing people with the opportunity to live and create a life where they want.
Pre-question text: We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway. Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please consider how important each of these considerations is for your own views on immigration.
Literal question: Providing people with the opportunity to live and create a life where they want.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 472 21.0% 0.21024499
2 Important 918 40.9% 0.40890869
3 Somewhat important 570 25.4% 0.25389755
4 Not very important 186 8.3% 0.08285078
5 Not at all important 55 2.4% 0.02449889
97 Not answered 44 2.0% 0.01959911
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvhsy_5


Variable label: How important these considerations are for your own views on immigration: Keeping criminals and violent people out of the country.
Pre-question text: We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway. Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please consider how important each of these considerations is for your own views on immigration.
Literal question: Keeping criminals and violent people out of the country.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 985 43.9% 0.43875278
2 Important 660 29.4% 0.29398664
3 Somewhat important 365 16.3% 0.16258352
4 Not very important 151 6.7% 0.06726058
5 Not at all important 39 1.7% 0.01737194
97 Not answered 45 2.0% 0.02004454
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvhsy_6


Variable label: How important these considerations are for your own views on immigration: Preventing the welfare system from being burdened at the expense of those who are already living in Norway.
Pre-question text: We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway. Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please consider how important each of these considerations is for your own views on immigration.
Literal question: Preventing the welfare system from being burdened at the expense of those who are already living in Norway.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 346 15.4% 0.15412027
2 Important 559 24.9% 0.24899777
3 Somewhat important 688 30.6% 0.30645880
4 Not very important 482 21.5% 0.21469933
5 Not at all important 120 5.3% 0.05345212
97 Not answered 50 2.2% 0.02227171
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvhsy_7


Variable label: How important these considerations are for your own views on immigration: Protecting liberal Western values (such as gender equality) from conservative mindsets.
Pre-question text: We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway. Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please consider how important each of these considerations is for your own views on immigration.
Literal question: Protecting liberal Western values (such as gender equality) from conservative mindsets.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 1012 45.1% 0.45077951
2 Important 720 32.1% 0.32071269
3 Somewhat important 283 12.6% 0.12605791
4 Not very important 131 5.8% 0.05835189
5 Not at all important 49 2.2% 0.02182628
97 Not answered 50 2.2% 0.02227171
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvhsy_8


Variable label: How important these considerations are for your own views on immigration: Preserving Norwegian culture and Norway’s distinctive character.
Pre-question text: We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway. Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please consider how important each of these considerations is for your own views on immigration.
Literal question: Preserving Norwegian culture and Norway’s distinctive character.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 589 26.2% 0.26236080
2 Important 805 35.9% 0.35857461
3 Somewhat important 532 23.7% 0.23697105
4 Not very important 206 9.2% 0.09175947
5 Not at all important 64 2.9% 0.02850780
97 Not answered 49 2.2% 0.02182628
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvhsy_9


Variable label: How important these considerations are for your own views on immigration: Other:
Pre-question text: We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway. Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please consider how important each of these considerations is for your own views on immigration.
Literal question: Other:
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 93 4.1% 0.041425390
2 Important 69 3.1% 0.030734967
3 Somewhat important 81 3.6% 0.036080178
4 Not very important 12 0.5% 0.005345212
5 Not at all important 42 1.9% 0.018708241
97 Not answered 1948 86.8% 0.867706013
98 Not asked 11495 NA


r25_dvhsy_9_other


Variable label: How important these considerations are for your own views on immigration: Other:
Pre-question text: We have previously asked Norwegian Citizen Panel participants about what considerations form the basis of their views on immigration to Norway. Below you will see some of those that were most often mentioned. Please consider how important each of these considerations is for your own views on immigration.
Literal question: Other:
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 2]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_cehyo


Variable label: What do you think when you hear or read the term «hydrogen»?
Pre-question text: You will now be exposed to a question where you should answer based on your associations
Literal question: What do you think when you hear or read the term «hydrogen»?
Post-question: Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you prefer.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 3]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_dvcla


Variable label: How many of the pupils in your school class had parents who were immigrants or had immigrated to Norway themselves
Pre-question text: Think back to when you were 15 years old
Literal question: How many of the pupils in your school class had parents who were immigrants or had immigrated to Norway themselves?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 None 4502 65.4% 0.6537902992
2 One or just a few 1718 24.9% 0.2494917223
3 Less than half 195 2.8% 0.0283183270
4 Half 30 0.4% 0.0043566657
5 More than half 13 0.2% 0.0018878885
6 Almost all 9 0.1% 0.0013069997
7 All 1 0.0% 0.0001452222
8 I didn’t attend school when I was 15 years old 32 0.5% 0.0046471101
9 I didn’t live in Norway when I was 15 years old 373 5.4% 0.0541678769
97 Not answered 13 0.2% 0.0018878885
98 Not asked 6854 NA


r25_dvfrf


Variable label: Among your friends when you were 15, how many had parents who were immigrants or had immigrated to Norway themselves
Pre-question text: Once again, think back to when you were 15 years old.
Literal question: Among your friends (people you trusted and could tell a secret to), how many had parents who were immigrants or had immigrated to Norway themselves?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 5439 79.0% 0.789863491
1 1 673 9.8% 0.097734534
2 2 217 3.2% 0.031513215
3 3 71 1.0% 0.010310775
4 4 26 0.4% 0.003775777
5 5 or more 40 0.6% 0.005808888
6 I didn’t live in Norway when I was 15 years old 388 5.6% 0.056346210
97 Not answered 32 0.5% 0.004647110
98 Not asked 6854 NA


r25_dvfrn


Variable label: Among your current friendships, how many have parents who are immigrants or have immigrated to Norway themselves?
Pre-question text: Think about your current friendships
Literal question: Among your friends (people you trust and can share private thoughts and feelings with), how many have parents who are immigrants or have immigrated to Norway themselves?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 3847 55.9% 0.558669765
1 1 1169 17.0% 0.169764740
2 2 768 11.2% 0.111530642
3 3 368 5.3% 0.053441766
4 4 140 2.0% 0.020331107
5 5 or more 531 7.7% 0.077112983
97 Not answered 63 0.9% 0.009148998
98 Not asked 6854 NA


r25_headv_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent will be exposed to [r25_headv], [r25_headv1], or [r25_headv2].
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2269] [Invalid:11471] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Exposed to [r25_headv] 734 32.3% 0.3234905
2 Exposed to [r25_headv1] 808 35.6% 0.3561040
3 Exposed to [r25_headv2] 727 32.0% 0.3204055
Sysmiss 11471 NA


r25_headv


Variable label: Awareness of lifestyle- and health-advice provided by health authorities
Literal question: Are you aware of the advice provided by the health authorities about lifestyle and health, such as advice about diet/nutrition or recommendations about flu vaccines?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_headv_ran = 1 & r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 699 95.2% 0.952316076
2 No 32 4.4% 0.043596730
97 Not answered 3 0.4% 0.004087193
98 Not asked 13006 NA


r25_headv1


Variable label: Awareness of lifestyle- and health-advice provided by health authorities
Literal question: Are you familiar with the lifestyle and health advice provided by the health authorities?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_headv_ran = 2 & r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 707 87.5% 0.875000000
2 No 100 12.4% 0.123762376
97 Not answered 1 0.1% 0.001237624
98 Not asked 12932 NA


r25_headv2


Variable label: Awareness of lifestyle- and health-advice provided by health authorities
Literal question: Are you familiar with the lifestyle and health advice provided by the health authorities, such as advice about diet/nutrition or recommendations about the use of antibiotics?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_headv_ran = 3 & r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 654 90.0% 0.899587345
2 No 71 9.8% 0.097661623
97 Not answered 2 0.3% 0.002751032
98 Not asked 13013 NA


r25_heant


Variable label: What does antibiotics work for
Literal question: What does antibiotics work for?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Bacterial infections 2111 92.8% 0.927504394
2 Viral infections 109 4.8% 0.047891037
3 All types of disease 19 0.8% 0.008347979
4 Do not know 20 0.9% 0.008787346
97 Not answered 17 0.7% 0.007469244
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heant_seen


Variable label: Experiment. Records whether the respondent has been exposed to [r25_heant]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2268] [Invalid:11472] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Seen [r25_heant] 2268 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 11472 NA


r25_heant_back


Variable label: Experiment. Records whether the respondent has navigated bact to [r25_heant] after being exposed to it and navigated past the question.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:83] [Invalid:13657] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Respondent has navigated back to [r25_heant] 83 100.0% 1
Sysmiss 13657 NA


r25_heant_originalvalue


Variable label: Experiment. The first answer given by the respondent in [r25_heant]
Technical description: [If the respondent has not changed answers in [r25_heant] the values in [r25_heant_originalvalue] will be identical. If the respondent has changed answer in [r25_heant], [r25_heant_originalvalue] will show what the respondents’ intial answer was.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2259] [Invalid:11481] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Bacterial infections 2068 91.5% 0.915449314
2 Viral infections 149 6.6% 0.065958389
3 All types of disease 21 0.9% 0.009296149
4 Do not know 21 0.9% 0.009296149
Sysmiss 11481 NA


r25_heanw_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_heanw]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2268] [Invalid:11472] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 antibiotic resistance 1132 49.9% 0.4991182
2 antibiotics losing their effect 1136 50.1% 0.5008818
Sysmiss 11472 NA


r25_heanw


Variable label: Concerned that [r25_heanw_ran] losing its effect
Pre-question text: Antibiotic resistance means that bacteria are resistant to antibiotics, i.e. bacteria cannot be killed by these drugs. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a growing problem.
Literal question: How concerned are you about [r25_heanwran]?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very worried 491 21.6% 0.215729350
2 Worried 848 37.3% 0.372583480
3 Somewhat worried 662 29.1% 0.290861160
4 Not very worried 210 9.2% 0.092267135
5 Not at all worried 55 2.4% 0.024165202
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.004393673
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heans_pipe


Variable label: Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_heans1] - [r25_heans3]
Technical description: [If [r25_heanw_ran] == 1 value is set to 1. If [r25_heanw_ran] == 2 value is set to 2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2268] [Invalid:11472] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 antibiotic resistance be... 1132 49.9% 0.4991182
2 it be if antibiotics lose their effect... 1136 50.1% 0.5008818
Sysmiss 11472 NA


r25_heans_1


Variable label: How serious will [r25_heans_pipe] losing its effect: for you
Pre-question text: How serious will [r25_heans_pipe]
Literal question: … for you?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very serious 432 19.0% 0.18980668
2 Serious 628 27.6% 0.27592267
3 Somewhat serious 604 26.5% 0.26537786
4 Not very serious 450 19.8% 0.19771529
5 Not a threat 131 5.8% 0.05755712
97 Not answered 31 1.4% 0.01362039
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heans_2


Variable label: How serious will [r25_heans_pipe] losing its effect: for Norway
Pre-question text: How serious will [r25_heans_pipe]
Literal question: … for Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very serious 891 39.1% 0.391476274
2 Serious 903 39.7% 0.396748682
3 Somewhat serious 340 14.9% 0.149384886
4 Not very serious 63 2.8% 0.027680141
5 Not a threat 17 0.7% 0.007469244
97 Not answered 62 2.7% 0.027240773
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heans_3


Variable label: How serious will [r25_heans_pipe] losing its effect: for the world
Pre-question text: How serious will [r25_heans_pipe]
Literal question: … for the world?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very serious 1589 69.8% 0.698154657
2 Serious 512 22.5% 0.224956063
3 Somewhat serious 99 4.3% 0.043497364
4 Not very serious 11 0.5% 0.004833040
5 Not a threat 8 0.4% 0.003514938
97 Not answered 57 2.5% 0.025043937
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heanm


Variable label: Concerned about the risk of becoming infected by antibiotic-resistant bacteria
Pre-question text: Once bacteria have become resistant they can continue to spread through contact between humans, through contact between humans and animals or to humans from water, food and the environment in general. The risk of being infected by antibiotic-resistant bacteria is greatest when we stay in areas where antibiotic resistance is widespread.
Literal question: Are you sometimes worried about the risk of becoming infected by antibiotic-resistant bacteria?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 902 39.6% 0.396309315
2 No 1358 59.7% 0.596660808
97 Not answered 16 0.7% 0.007029877
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heanc


Variable label: Are you ever worried about infecting others with antibiotic-resistant bacteria
Literal question: Are you ever worried about infecting others with antibiotic-resistant bacteria?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 372 16.3% 0.163444640
2 No 1883 82.7% 0.827328647
97 Not answered 21 0.9% 0.009226714
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heanl_1


Variable label: How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to: Nordic countries
Pre-question text: How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to:
Literal question: Nordic countries
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 5 0.2% 0.002196837
2 Likely 42 1.8% 0.018453427
3 Fairly likely 300 13.2% 0.131810193
4 Not very likely 1670 73.4% 0.733743409
5 Not at all likely 231 10.1% 0.101493849
97 Not answered 28 1.2% 0.012302285
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heanl_2


Variable label: How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to: Great Britain
Pre-question text: How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to:
Literal question: Great Britain
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 19 0.8% 0.008347979
2 Likely 122 5.4% 0.053602812
3 Fairly likely 803 35.3% 0.352811951
4 Not very likely 1180 51.8% 0.518453427
5 Not at all likely 105 4.6% 0.046133568
97 Not answered 47 2.1% 0.020650264
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heanl_3


Variable label: How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to: Southern Europe
Pre-question text: How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to:
Literal question: Southern Europe
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 63 2.8% 0.02768014
2 Likely 297 13.0% 0.13049209
3 Fairly likely 1172 51.5% 0.51493849
4 Not very likely 645 28.3% 0.28339192
5 Not at all likely 62 2.7% 0.02724077
97 Not answered 37 1.6% 0.01625659
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heanl_4


Variable label: How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to: Eastern Europe
Pre-question text: How likely do you think it is that you will become infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria when travelling in/to:
Literal question: Eastern Europe
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 123 5.4% 0.05404218
2 Likely 447 19.6% 0.19639719
3 Fairly likely 1101 48.4% 0.48374341
4 Not very likely 511 22.5% 0.22451670
5 Not at all likely 57 2.5% 0.02504394
97 Not answered 37 1.6% 0.01625659
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heank_1


Variable label: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: General practitioner
Pre-question text: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
Literal question: General practitioner
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1070 47.0% 0.470123023
0 Not selected 1196 52.5% 0.525483304
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.004393673
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heank_2


Variable label: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: Other health professionals
Pre-question text: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
Literal question: Other health professionals
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 492 21.6% 0.216168717
0 Not selected 1774 77.9% 0.779437610
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.004393673
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heank_3


Variable label: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: News media
Pre-question text: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
Literal question: News media
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1247 54.8% 0.547891037
0 Not selected 1019 44.8% 0.447715290
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.004393673
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heank_4


Variable label: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: Social media
Pre-question text: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
Literal question: Social media
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 257 11.3% 0.112917399
0 Not selected 2009 88.3% 0.882688928
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.004393673
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heank_5


Variable label: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: Official websites (such as antibiotika.no, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, etc.)
Pre-question text: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
Literal question: Official websites (such as antibiotika.no, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, etc.)
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1123 49.3% 0.493409490
0 Not selected 1143 50.2% 0.502196837
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.004393673
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heank_6


Variable label: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: Friends and acquaintances
Pre-question text: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
Literal question: Friends and acquaintances
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 368 16.2% 0.161687170
0 Not selected 1898 83.4% 0.833919156
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.004393673
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heank_7


Variable label: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: Other
Pre-question text: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
Literal question: Other
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 187 8.2% 0.082161687
0 Not selected 2079 91.3% 0.913444640
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.004393673
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heank_7_other


Variable label: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics: Other
Pre-question text: How do you obtain knowledge about taking antibiotics?
Literal question: Other
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 3]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_headc


Variable label: The advice I receive about antibiotic use is easy to understand
Literal question: The advice I receive about antibiotic use is easy to understand
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 448 19.7% 0.196836555
2 Agree 1061 46.6% 0.466168717
3 Agree somewhat 306 13.4% 0.134446397
4 Neither agree nor disagree 241 10.6% 0.105887522
5 Disagree somewhat 38 1.7% 0.016695958
6 Disagree 10 0.4% 0.004393673
7 Strongly disagree 3 0.1% 0.001318102
8 I have never received or read any advice about antibiotic use 151 6.6% 0.066344464
97 Not answered 18 0.8% 0.007908612
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_heaus_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_heaus]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2265] [Invalid:11475] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 during the last 5 years 1140 50.3% 0.5033113
2 the last year 1125 49.7% 0.4966887
Sysmiss 11475 NA


r25_heaus


Variable label: Used antibiotics [r25_heaus_ran]
Literal question: Have you ever taken antibiotics [r25_heausran]?
Post-question: For example, as a pill, ointment, drops or intravenously.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 744 32.7% 0.326889279
2 No 1403 61.6% 0.616432337
3 Can’t remember 93 4.1% 0.040861160
4 Do not know 18 0.8% 0.007908612
97 Not answered 18 0.8% 0.007908612
98 Not asked 11464 NA


r25_dvetn_1


Variable label: I identify as: Norwegian
Pre-question text: People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
Literal question: Norwegian
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_dvetn_2


Variable label: I identify as: Sami
Pre-question text: People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
Literal question: Sami
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_dvetn_3


Variable label: I identify as: Kven/Norwegian Finnish
Pre-question text: People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
Literal question: Kven/Norwegian Finnish
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_dvetn_4


Variable label: I identify as: Forest Finn
Pre-question text: People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
Literal question: Forest Finn
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_dvetn_5


Variable label: I identify as: Other
Pre-question text: People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
Literal question: Other
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_dvetn_5_other


Variable label: I identify as: Other
Pre-question text: People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
Literal question: Other
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_dvtck


Variable label: Aware that the Storting has appointed a commission to investigate the Norwegianisation policy
Literal question: Are you aware that the Storting (the Norwegian parliament) has appointed a special truth and reconciliation commission to investigate the Norwegianisation policy that targeted Sami, Kven, Norwegian Finn, and Forest Finn people?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 1021 43.7% 0.437071918
2 No 1304 55.8% 0.558219178
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.004708904
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtcr


Variable label: To what extent a truth and reconciliation commission can contribute to reconciliation between minority groups and the state
Literal question: To what extent do you think that a truth and reconciliation commission in Norway can contribute to reconciliation between minority groups (Sami, Kven, Norwegian Finn, and Forest Finn people) and the State?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 30 1.3% 0.01284247
2 To a great extent 266 11.4% 0.11386986
3 To some extent 1030 44.1% 0.44092466
4 To a small extent 475 20.3% 0.20333904
5 Not at all 136 5.8% 0.05821918
6 Do not know 390 16.7% 0.16695205
97 Not answered 9 0.4% 0.00385274
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtcn_1


Variable label: Most people are familiar with the Norweginisation policy with regard to: Sami people
Pre-question text: How familiar do you think most people are with the State’s active Norwegianisation policy in respect of the following groups that was pursued up until the 1960s?
Literal question: Sami people
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very familiar 134 5.7% 0.057363014
2 Familiar 611 26.2% 0.261558219
3 Not very familiar 1030 44.1% 0.440924658
4 Not at all familiar 252 10.8% 0.107876712
5 Do not know 291 12.5% 0.124571918
97 Not answered 18 0.8% 0.007705479
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtcn_2


Variable label: Most people are familiar with the Norweginisation policy with regard to: Kven/Norwegian Finns
Pre-question text: How familiar do you think most people are with the State’s active Norwegianisation policy in respect of the following groups that was pursued up until the 1960s?
Literal question: Kven/Norwegian Finns
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very familiar 35 1.5% 0.01498288
2 Familiar 145 6.2% 0.06207192
3 Not very familiar 921 39.4% 0.39426370
4 Not at all familiar 837 35.8% 0.35830479
5 Do not know 356 15.2% 0.15239726
97 Not answered 42 1.8% 0.01797945
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtcn_3


Variable label: Most people are familiar with the Norweginisation policy with regard to: Forest Finns
Pre-question text: How familiar do you think most people are with the State’s active Norwegianisation policy in respect of the following groups that was pursued up until the 1960s?
Literal question: Forest Finns
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very familiar 30 1.3% 0.01284247
2 Familiar 94 4.0% 0.04023973
3 Not very familiar 742 31.8% 0.31763699
4 Not at all familiar 1027 44.0% 0.43964041
5 Do not know 399 17.1% 0.17080479
97 Not answered 44 1.9% 0.01883562
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtcm_1


Variable label: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: TV
Pre-question text: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question: TV
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 654 28.0% 0.279965753
0 Not selected 1671 71.5% 0.715325342
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.004708904
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtcm_2


Variable label: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: Radio
Pre-question text: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question: Radio
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 311 13.3% 0.133133562
0 Not selected 2014 86.2% 0.862157534
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.004708904
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtcm_3


Variable label: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: National newspapers (paper newspapers and online newspapers)
Pre-question text: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question: National newspapers (paper newspapers and online newspapers)
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 488 20.9% 0.208904110
0 Not selected 1837 78.6% 0.786386986
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.004708904
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtcm_4


Variable label: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: Local newspapers (paper newspapers and online newspapers)
Pre-question text: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question: Local newspapers (paper newspapers and online newspapers)
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 97 4.2% 0.041523973
0 Not selected 2228 95.4% 0.953767123
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.004708904
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtcm_5


Variable label: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: Social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.)
Pre-question text: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question: Social media (Facebook, Youtube, etc.)
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 87 3.7% 0.037243151
0 Not selected 2238 95.8% 0.958047945
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.004708904
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtcm_6


Variable label: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: Other sources
Pre-question text: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question: Other sources
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 132 5.7% 0.056506849
0 Not selected 2193 93.9% 0.938784247
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.004708904
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtcm_7


Variable label: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media: Haven’t heard about the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Pre-question text: Have you heard, seen or read about the Truth and Reconciliation Committee in the following media:
Literal question: Haven’t heard about the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Post-question: Several answers are possible
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1219 52.2% 0.521832192
0 Not selected 1106 47.3% 0.473458904
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.004708904
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtim


Variable label: How important do you think the work/aim of the Truth and Reconiciliation Comission is?
Pre-question text:

In 2018 the Storting set up a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to investigate historical injustices against the Sami people and three minority groups in Norway (Kvens, Norwegian Finns and Forest Finns). Prior to its establishment, discussions took place both within the Sami, Kven and Norwegian-Finnish communities and there was partisan disagreement about the importance of such a commission.

One of the arguments in favour of setting up the commission was that we need more knowledge about Norwegianisation policy and its consequences. One argument against was to leave historical injustices in the past; you have to move on.

One of the main tasks of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is to create reconciliation in Norway between (a) minority groups (Sami, Kvens/Norwegian Finns and Forest Finns) and the state, and (b) between these different minority groups and the majority population.
Literal question: How important do you think this work/aim is?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 507 21.7% 0.217037671
2 Important 1058 45.3% 0.452910959
3 Not very important 402 17.2% 0.172089041
4 Not at all important 111 4.8% 0.047517123
5 Do not know 241 10.3% 0.103167808
97 Not answered 17 0.7% 0.007277397
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_dvtme


Variable label: Concerns you personally: The Truth and Reconciliation Commissions work for reconciliation between minority groups and the Norwegian majority population
Pre-question text: Since 2018 the Norwegian Truth and Reconciliation Commission has been working to collect information about the Norwegian state’s treatment of the Sami, Kvens, Norwegian Finns and Forest Finns. Its objective is to create reconciliation between these groups and the Norwegian majority population.
Literal question: To what extent do you feel that this objective concerns you personally?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_dvtfi


Variable label: Knows the film: ‘Historjá - Embroidery for Sápmi’ (2022)
Pre-question text: [image of movieposter] The film “Historjá - Embroidery for Sápmi” (2022) has been running in Norwegian cinemas since August. It is a documentary about a well-known female Sami artist whose embroidery conveys the Norwegianisation policy that the Sami have been subjected to and which many believe is still ongoing.
Literal question: Do you know this film?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes, I've seen it 14 0.6% 0.005993151
2 Yes, I've heard about it, but I haven't seen it 266 11.4% 0.113869863
3 Yes, I've heard about it and I would like to see it 123 5.3% 0.052654110
4 No, I have never heard of the film 1914 81.9% 0.819349315
97 Not answered 19 0.8% 0.008133562
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_mepansen_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent will be exposed to [r25_mepanx] or [r25_mesenx]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2270] [Invalid:11470] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Exposed to [r25_mepanx] 1154 50.8% 0.50837
2 Exposed to [r25_mesenx] 1116 49.2% 0.49163
Sysmiss 11470 NA


r25_mepanx


Variable label: Describe a situation when you were really fed up with the news or wanted to take a break from it
Pre-question text: The media often focus on negative events and crises. Sometimes the amount of negative news can seem overwhelming and make you feel tired, powerless and in a bad mood. Sometimes you just want to take a break from all the negative news.
Literal question: Can you recall and describe a particular situation when you were really fed up with the news or wanted to take a break from it?
Post-question: Please describe this memory and how you felt in a couple of sentences, or just a few words if that’s more convenient for you.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25mepansen_ran = 1 & r25_group = 5]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_mesenx


Variable label: Describe a situation when it was really important for you to follow the news
Pre-question text: The media are one of our most important sources of information about what is happening in Norway and the rest of the world. Sometimes we might have a strong desire to read the news and update ourselves about crises and important events.
Literal question: Can you recall and describe a situation when it was very important for you to follow the news?
Post-question: Please describe this memory and how you felt in a couple of sentences, or just a few words if that’s more convenient for you.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25mepansen_ran = 2 & r25_group = 5]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_mepanx_length


Variable label: Carries the number of characters written in [r25_mepanx]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1150] [Invalid:12590] [Range:0-1402]



r25_mesenx_length


Variable label: Carries the number of characters written in [r25_mesenx]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1111] [Invalid:12629] [Range:0-995]



r25_mernex_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I want to read news about crises right now
Pre-question text: When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question: I want to read news about crises right now
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 5]

[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 140 6.2% 0.06156552
2 Agree 352 15.5% 0.15479332
3 Agree somewhat 436 19.2% 0.19173263
4 Neither agree nor disagree 417 18.3% 0.18337731
5 Disagree somewhat 358 15.7% 0.15743184
6 Disagree 331 14.6% 0.14555849
7 Strongly disagree 195 8.6% 0.08575198
97 Not answered 45 2.0% 0.01978892
98 Not asked 11466 NA


r25_mernex_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I would prefer to read something entertaining rather than reading news about crises right now
Pre-question text: When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question: I would prefer to read something entertaining rather than reading news about crises right now
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 5]

[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 161 7.1% 0.07080035
2 Agree 404 17.8% 0.17766051
3 Agree somewhat 507 22.3% 0.22295515
4 Neither agree nor disagree 510 22.4% 0.22427441
5 Disagree somewhat 317 13.9% 0.13940193
6 Disagree 240 10.6% 0.10554090
7 Strongly disagree 82 3.6% 0.03605981
97 Not answered 53 2.3% 0.02330695
98 Not asked 11466 NA


r25_mernex_3


Variable label: Agree/disagree: It’s best for me to take breaks from reading news about crises right now
Pre-question text: When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question: It’s best for me to take breaks from reading news about crises right now
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 5]

[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 128 5.6% 0.05628848
2 Agree 261 11.5% 0.11477573
3 Agree somewhat 400 17.6% 0.17590150
4 Neither agree nor disagree 535 23.5% 0.23526825
5 Disagree somewhat 327 14.4% 0.14379947
6 Disagree 419 18.4% 0.18425682
7 Strongly disagree 150 6.6% 0.06596306
97 Not answered 54 2.4% 0.02374670
98 Not asked 11466 NA


r25_mernex_4


Variable label: Agree/disagree: It’s important for me not to miss any major news about society right now
Pre-question text: When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question: It’s important for me not to miss any major news about society right now
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 5]

[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 353 15.5% 0.15523307
2 Agree 810 35.6% 0.35620053
3 Agree somewhat 496 21.8% 0.21811785
4 Neither agree nor disagree 275 12.1% 0.12093228
5 Disagree somewhat 144 6.3% 0.06332454
6 Disagree 105 4.6% 0.04617414
7 Strongly disagree 48 2.1% 0.02110818
97 Not answered 43 1.9% 0.01890941
98 Not asked 11466 NA


r25_mernex_5


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The amount of negative news is overwhelming for me
Pre-question text: When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question: The amount of negative news is overwhelming for me
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 5]

[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 67 5.8% 0.05805893
2 Agree 154 13.3% 0.13344887
3 Agree somewhat 323 28.0% 0.27989601
4 Neither agree nor disagree 213 18.5% 0.18457539
5 Disagree somewhat 140 12.1% 0.12131716
6 Disagree 172 14.9% 0.14904679
7 Strongly disagree 63 5.5% 0.05459272
97 Not answered 22 1.9% 0.01906412
98 Not asked 12586 NA


r25_mernex_6


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The news focuses too much on negative events
Pre-question text: When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question: The news focuses too much on negative events
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 5]

[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 145 12.6% 0.12564991
2 Agree 232 20.1% 0.20103986
3 Agree somewhat 316 27.4% 0.27383016
4 Neither agree nor disagree 220 19.1% 0.19064125
5 Disagree somewhat 106 9.2% 0.09185442
6 Disagree 92 8.0% 0.07972270
7 Strongly disagree 22 1.9% 0.01906412
97 Not answered 21 1.8% 0.01819757
98 Not asked 12586 NA


r25_mernex_7


Variable label: Agree/disagree: It’s important that I keep up to date with the news
Pre-question text: When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question: It’s important that I keep up to date with the news
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 5]

[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] was also shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] was also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 262 23.5% 0.23476703
2 Agree 488 43.7% 0.43727599
3 Agree somewhat 234 21.0% 0.20967742
4 Neither agree nor disagree 45 4.0% 0.04032258
5 Disagree somewhat 29 2.6% 0.02598566
6 Disagree 21 1.9% 0.01881720
7 Strongly disagree 18 1.6% 0.01612903
97 Not answered 19 1.7% 0.01702509
98 Not asked 12624 NA


r25_mernex_8


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I feel it’s my duty to keep up to date with the news
Pre-question text: When you think about how you feel at this moment, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question: I feel it’s my duty to keep up to date with the news
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 5]

[All respondents were exposed to [r25_mernex_1] - [r25_mernex_4]. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 1 [r25_mernex_5] and [r25_mernex_6] are also shown. If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 2 [r25_mernex_7] and [r25_mernex_8] are also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 172 15.4% 0.15412186
2 Agree 372 33.3% 0.33333333
3 Agree somewhat 264 23.7% 0.23655914
4 Neither agree nor disagree 142 12.7% 0.12724014
5 Disagree somewhat 54 4.8% 0.04838710
6 Disagree 57 5.1% 0.05107527
7 Strongly disagree 33 3.0% 0.02956989
97 Not answered 22 2.0% 0.01971326
98 Not asked 12624 NA


r25_mernw_group


Variable label: Experiment. Subgroup for the [r25_mernw]-experiment and associated variables.
Pre-question text:

If [r25_mepansen_ran] == 1:

Sometimes you’re so tired and overwhelmed that you can’t bear to follow news that might put you in a bad mood. Sometimes you want to take a break from news about negative events and crises. Think about how you feel and what’s important to you right now.

During the next three minutes, you’ll be able to use a news site in a way that suits you best right now. You can click on and read any items that you want. All the items describe real events and are written by real journalists.

Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” in order to return to the front page.

The survey will automatically move on to the next question after three minutes.

[r25_mepansen_ran] == 2:

Sometimes it’s extra important to keep up to date and follow the news. Think about how you feel and what’s important to you right now.

During the next three minutes you will be able to keep up to date with the news by using a news site. You can click on and read the items you want and that feel right for you right now. All the items describe real events and are written by real journalists.

Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” in order to return to the front page.

The survey will automatically move on to the next question after three minutes.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2246] [Invalid:11494] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group 1 - Traditional articles 1182 52.6% 0.5262689
2 Group 2 - Constructive articles 1064 47.4% 0.4737311
Sysmiss 11494 NA


r25_mernw_session


Variable label: Experiment. Number of sessions in [r25_mernw]
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Technical description: [Contact for further documentation]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2246] [Invalid:11494] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1971 87.8% 0.877560107
2 228 10.2% 0.101513802
3 36 1.6% 0.016028495
4 10 0.4% 0.004452360
9 1 0.0% 0.000445236
Sysmiss 11494 NA


r25_mernwtimefp1


Variable label: Experiment. Time spent on front page in first session in [r25_mernw].
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Technical description: [Contact for further documentation]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2109] [Invalid:11631] [Range:-]



r25_mernwtimefp2


Variable label: Experiment. Time spent on front page in second session in [r25_mernw].
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Technical description: [Contact for further documentation]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:248] [Invalid:13492] [Range:-]



r25_mernwtimefp3


Variable label: Experiment. Time spent on front page in the last session in [r25_mernw], if more than two sessions.
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Technical description: [Contact for further documentation]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:44] [Invalid:13696] [Range:-]



r25_mernwtime1


Variable label: Experiment. Time spent on individual articles in first session in [r25_mernw]
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Technical description:

[article1, article2, article..n, article17]

[Contact for further documentation]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2109] [Invalid:11631] [Range:-]



r25_mernwtime2


Variable label: Experiment. Time spent on invidiual articles in second session in [r25_mernw]
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Technical description:

[article1, article2, article..n, article17]

[Contact for further documentation]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:248] [Invalid:13492] [Range:-]



r25_mernwtime3


Variable label: Experiment. Time spent on individual articles in the last session in [r25_mernw], if more than two sessions
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Technical description:

[article1, article2, article..n, article17]

[Contact for further documentation]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:44] [Invalid:13696] [Range:-]



r25_mernwclickorder1


Variable label: Experiment. Click-order from the first session in [r25_mernw]
Post-question: [Contact for further documentation]
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:1469] [Invalid:12271] [Range:-]



r25_mernwclickorder2


Variable label: Experiment. Click-order from the second session in [r25_mernw]
Post-question: [Contact for further documentation]
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:178] [Invalid:13562] [Range:-]



r25_mernwclickorder3


Variable label: Experiment. Click-order from the last session in [r25_mernw], if more than two sessions
Post-question: [Contact for further documentation]
Question owner: Erik Knudsen (UiB)
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:28] [Invalid:13712] [Range:-]



r25_poelpx


Variable label: To what extent do you feel confident that you can contribute towards solving the climate crisis?
Literal question: To what extent do you feel confident that you can contribute towards solving the climate crisis?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 28 1.2% 0.01231310
2 To a great extent 130 5.7% 0.05716799
3 Somewhat 885 38.9% 0.38918206
4 Slightly 929 40.9% 0.40853122
5 Not at all 239 10.5% 0.10510114
97 Not answered 63 2.8% 0.02770449
98 Not asked 11466 NA


r25_poreix


Variable label: To what extent do you feel confident that you can deal with recent interest rate increases?
Literal question: To what extent do you feel confident that you can deal with recent interest rate increases?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 587 25.8% 0.25813544
2 To a great extent 876 38.5% 0.38522427
3 Somewhat 523 23.0% 0.22999120
4 Slightly 138 6.1% 0.06068602
5 Not at all 41 1.8% 0.01802990
97 Not answered 109 4.8% 0.04793316
98 Not asked 11466 NA


r25_mefnex


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I would like to keep up with important news stories right now
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question: I would like to keep up with important news stories right now.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 472 20.8% 0.20756376
2 Agree 962 42.3% 0.42304310
3 Agree somewhat 488 21.5% 0.21459982
4 Neither agree nor disagree 144 6.3% 0.06332454
5 Disagree somewhat 75 3.3% 0.03298153
6 Disagree 44 1.9% 0.01934916
7 Strongly disagree 29 1.3% 0.01275286
97 Not answered 60 2.6% 0.02638522
98 Not asked 11466 NA


r25_limeax


Variable label: To what extent do you feel that what you do in life is meaningful
Literal question: All things considered, to what extent do you feel that what you do in life is meaningful?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very meaningful 470 20.7% 0.20668426
2 Fairly meaningful 1111 48.9% 0.48856640
3 Slightly meaningful 502 22.1% 0.22075638
4 Not very meaningful 105 4.6% 0.04617414
5 Not at all meaningful 24 1.1% 0.01055409
97 Not answered 62 2.7% 0.02726473
98 Not asked 11466 NA


r25_cerenx_1a_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
Equivalent in others panels: p8saneclim_1a_ran
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 3,4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 a large solar energy park in your municipality 1589 34.7% 0.3467161
2 a large onshore wind farm in your municipality 1500 32.7% 0.3272965
3 a large hydrogen production plant in your municipality 1494 32.6% 0.3259873
Sysmiss 9157 NA


r25_cerenx_1b_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
Equivalent in others panels: p8saneclim_1b_ran
Technical description: [If [r25_cerenx_1a_ran] == 1 the value is set to 1. If [r25_cerenx_1a_ran] == 2 the value is set to 2. If [r25_cerenx_1a_ran] == 3 the value is set to 3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 the solar energy park 1589 34.7% 0.3467161
2 the wind farm 1500 32.7% 0.3272965
3 hydrogen production plant 1494 32.6% 0.3259873
Sysmiss 9157 NA


r25_cerenx_2_ran1


Variable label: Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
Equivalent in others panels: p8saneclim_2_ran1
Technical description: [If [r25_cerenx_3_ran1] == 1 or [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] == 1 the value is set to 2. For other cases the value is set to 1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Due to its size [r25_cerenx_1b_ran] will have both positive and negative consequences 2560 55.9% 0.5585861
2 BLANK 2023 44.1% 0.4414139
Sysmiss 9157 NA


r25_cerenx_2_ran2


Variable label: Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
Equivalent in others panels: p8saneclim_2_ran2
Technical description: [If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] == 1 the value is set to 2. If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] == 1 or [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] == 1 the value is set to 3. If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] the value is set to 3. For other cases the value is set to 1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 On the one hand, it will 2560 55.9% 0.5585861
2 However, due to its size, [r25_cerenx_1b_ran] will also 856 18.7% 0.1867772
3 BLANK 1167 25.5% 0.2546367
Sysmiss 9157 NA


r25_cerenx_2_ran3


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
Equivalent in others panels: p8saneclim_2_ran3
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 3,4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 BLANK 1167 25.5% 0.2546367
2 harm local nature and wildlife by, for example, disrupting ecosystems and animal migration. 1139 24.9% 0.2485272
3 damage the beautiful surrounding countryside, something which could reduce our enjoyment of outdoor activities. 1166 25.4% 0.2544185
4 close some natural areas to the general public as a result of safety measures. 1111 24.2% 0.2424176
Sysmiss 9157 NA


r25_cerenx_3_ran1


Variable label: Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
Equivalent in others panels: p8saneclim_3_ran1
Technical description: [If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] != 1 the value is set to 1. If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] == 1 and [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] != 1 the value is set to 2. If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] == 1 and [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] the value is set to 3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 On the other hand it will [r25_cerenx_1b_ran] 2560 55.9% 0.5585861
2 In addition, due to its size, [r25_cerenx_1b_ran] will also 841 18.4% 0.1835043
3 BLANK 1182 25.8% 0.2579097
Sysmiss 9157 NA


r25_cerenx_3_ran2


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
Equivalent in others panels: p8saneclim_3_ran2
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 3,4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 BLANK 1182 25.8% 0.2579097
2 mean that electricity will be cheaper in your municipality 1190 26.0% 0.2596552
3 mean that new jobs will be created in your municipality. 1112 24.3% 0.2426358
4 mean that extra tax revenue will be generated in your municipality, which will benefit the residents. 1099 24.0% 0.2397993
Sysmiss 9157 NA


r25_cerenx_wording


Variable label: Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_cerenx]
Equivalent in others panels: p8saneclim_wording
Technical description: [If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] == 1 and [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] == 1 the value is set to 2. If [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] != 1 and [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] == 1, or [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] == 1 and [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] != 1, or [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] != 1 and [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] != 1 the value is set to 1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4583] [Invalid:9157] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Based on this information, to 4257 92.9% 0.92886755
2 To 326 7.1% 0.07113245
Sysmiss 9157 NA


r25_cerenx_t_order


Variable label: Experiment. Selects order for textpiping between [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] and [r25_cerenx_3_ran2]
Equivalent in others panels: p8saneclim_t_order
Technical description: [If [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] != 1 and [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] != 1 the value is randomised. For all other scenarios, the value is set to 1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2560] [Invalid:11180] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [r25_cerenx_2_ran3] is shown first 1315 51.4% 0.5136719
2 [r25_cerenx_3_ran2] is shown first 1245 48.6% 0.4863281
Sysmiss 11180 NA


r25_cerenx


Variable label: For/against: building [r25_cerenx_1a_ran]
Pre-question text:

Imagine that you have to make a decision in a case. The hypothetical decision is as follows:

A proposal is put forward to build [r25_cerenx_1a_ran]. This will help reduce CO2 emissions.

[r25_cerenx_2_ran1][r25_cerenx_2_ran2][r25_cerenx_pipe1]

[r25_cerenx_3_ran1][r25_cerenx_pipe2]

[r25_cerenxwording] to what extent would you be in favour of or against the development of [r25_cerenx1bran]?
Literal question: [r25_cerenxwording] to what extent would you be in favour of or against the development of [r25_cerenx1bran]?
Equivalent in others panels: p8saneclim
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 3,4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly for 495 10.7% 0.107328708
2 For 1157 25.1% 0.250867303
3 Somewhat for 908 19.7% 0.196877710
4 Neither for nor against 430 9.3% 0.093235039
5 Somewhat against 612 13.3% 0.132697311
6 Against 516 11.2% 0.111882047
7 Strongly against 460 10.0% 0.099739809
97 Not answered 34 0.7% 0.007372073
98 Not asked 9128 NA


r25_cecar_1


Variable label: Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines: This proposal is a good idea.
Pre-question text:

The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The following statements apply to this proposal.

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of them.
Literal question: This proposal is a good idea.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 162 6.9% 0.06934932
2 Agree 474 20.3% 0.20291096
3 Neither agree nor disagree 415 17.8% 0.17765411
4 Disagree 544 23.3% 0.23287671
5 Strongly disagree 591 25.3% 0.25299658
6 Don’t know/don’t want to answer 96 4.1% 0.04109589
97 Not answered 54 2.3% 0.02311644
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_cecar_2


Variable label: Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines: This proposal is sensible.
Pre-question text:

The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The following statements apply to this proposal.

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of them.
Literal question: This proposal is sensible.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 156 6.7% 0.06678082
2 Agree 509 21.8% 0.21789384
3 Neither agree nor disagree 420 18.0% 0.17979452
4 Disagree 571 24.4% 0.24443493
5 Strongly disagree 531 22.7% 0.22731164
6 Don’t know/don’t want to answer 93 4.0% 0.03981164
97 Not answered 56 2.4% 0.02397260
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_cecar_3


Variable label: Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines: We should invest more money from both the public and private sectors in implementing this proposal.
Pre-question text:

The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The following statements apply to this proposal.

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of them.
Literal question: We should invest more money from both the public and private sectors in implementing this proposal.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 126 5.4% 0.05393836
2 Agree 501 21.4% 0.21446918
3 Neither agree nor disagree 550 23.5% 0.23544521
4 Disagree 474 20.3% 0.20291096
5 Strongly disagree 451 19.3% 0.19306507
6 Don’t know/don’t want to answer 166 7.1% 0.07106164
97 Not answered 68 2.9% 0.02910959
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_cecar_4


Variable label: Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines: People should be informed about the merits of this proposal.
Pre-question text:

The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The following statements apply to this proposal.

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of them.
Literal question: People should be informed about the merits of this proposal.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 485 20.8% 0.20761986
2 Agree 1027 44.0% 0.43964041
3 Neither agree nor disagree 442 18.9% 0.18921233
4 Disagree 122 5.2% 0.05222603
5 Strongly disagree 110 4.7% 0.04708904
6 Don’t know/don’t want to answer 95 4.1% 0.04066781
97 Not answered 55 2.4% 0.02354452
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_cecar_5


Variable label: Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines: Accepting this proposal would have been a waste of resources.
Pre-question text:

The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The following statements apply to this proposal.

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of them.
Literal question: Accepting this proposal would have been a waste of resources.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 346 14.8% 0.14811644
2 Agree 575 24.6% 0.24614726
3 Neither agree nor disagree 471 20.2% 0.20162671
4 Disagree 460 19.7% 0.19691781
5 Strongly disagree 284 12.2% 0.12157534
6 Don’t know/don’t want to answer 143 6.1% 0.06121575
97 Not answered 57 2.4% 0.02440068
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_cecar_6


Variable label: Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines: Accepting this proposal would have been a mistake.
Pre-question text:

The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The following statements apply to this proposal.

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of them.
Literal question: Accepting this proposal would have been a mistake.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 445 19.0% 0.19049658
2 Agree 593 25.4% 0.25385274
3 Neither agree nor disagree 417 17.9% 0.17851027
4 Disagree 433 18.5% 0.18535959
5 Strongly disagree 282 12.1% 0.12071918
6 Don’t know/don’t want to answer 116 5.0% 0.04965753
97 Not answered 50 2.1% 0.02140411
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_cecar_7


Variable label: Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines: People should be warned about the disadvantages of this proposal.
Pre-question text:

The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The following statements apply to this proposal.

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of them.
Literal question: People should be warned about the disadvantages of this proposal.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 543 23.2% 0.23244863
2 Agree 1001 42.9% 0.42851027
3 Neither agree nor disagree 400 17.1% 0.17123288
4 Disagree 157 6.7% 0.06720890
5 Strongly disagree 96 4.1% 0.04109589
6 Don’t know/don’t want to answer 85 3.6% 0.03638699
97 Not answered 54 2.3% 0.02311644
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_cecar_8


Variable label: Absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines: We should strongly oppose political parties that support this proposal.
Pre-question text:

The government is proposing an absolute legal ban on the sale of new private cars with petrol or diesel engines with effect from 2025. The following statements apply to this proposal.

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of them.
Literal question: We should strongly oppose political parties that support this proposal.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 4]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 310 13.3% 0.13270548
2 Agree 393 16.8% 0.16823630
3 Neither agree nor disagree 545 23.3% 0.23330479
4 Disagree 516 22.1% 0.22089041
5 Strongly disagree 421 18.0% 0.18022260
6 Don’t know/don’t want to answer 96 4.1% 0.04109589
97 Not answered 55 2.4% 0.02354452
98 Not asked 11404 NA


r25_pcpak


Variable label: Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Literal question: Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 65 2.9% 0.029491833
2 The Conservative Party 551 25.0% 0.250000000
3 The Progressive Party 156 7.1% 0.070780399
4 The Liberal Party 105 4.8% 0.047640653
5 The Socialist Left Party 220 10.0% 0.099818512
6 The Centre Party 113 5.1% 0.051270417
7 The Green Party 111 5.0% 0.050362976
8 The Labour Party 477 21.6% 0.216424682
9 The Red Party 128 5.8% 0.058076225
10 Folkets parti FNB 7 0.3% 0.003176044
11 A joint party list 4 0.2% 0.001814882
12 A local list 53 2.4% 0.024047187
13 Would cast a blank vote 65 2.9% 0.029491833
14 Would not vote 52 2.4% 0.023593466
15 Not entitled to vote 11 0.5% 0.004990926
16 Other: 81 3.7% 0.036751361
97 Not answered 5 0.2% 0.002268603
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_pcpak_16_other


Variable label: Other: Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Pre-question text: Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Literal question: Other
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomized]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_pcpaf


Variable label: Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Literal question: Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 66 3.0% 0.029945554
2 The Conservative Party 533 24.2% 0.241833031
3 The Progressive Party 161 7.3% 0.073049002
4 The Liberal Party 96 4.4% 0.043557169
5 The Socialist Left Party 227 10.3% 0.102994555
6 The Centre Party 106 4.8% 0.048094374
7 The Green Party 128 5.8% 0.058076225
8 The Labour Party 442 20.1% 0.200544465
9 The Red Party 119 5.4% 0.053992740
10 Folkets parti FNB 4 0.2% 0.001814882
11 A joint party list 0 0.0% 0.000000000
12 A local list 25 1.1% 0.011343013
13 Would cast a blank vote 76 3.4% 0.034482759
14 Would not vote 109 4.9% 0.049455535
15 Not entitled to vote 14 0.6% 0.006352087
16 Other: 86 3.9% 0.039019964
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.005444646
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_pcpaf_16_other


Variable label: Other: Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Pre-question text: Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Literal question: Other
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomized]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_mlmrc


Variable label: Do you live in a merged county?
Literal question: Do you live in a merged county?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 1517 68.8% 0.688294011
2 No 680 30.9% 0.308529946
97 Not answered 7 0.3% 0.003176044
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mlat_1


Variable label: How strong is your connection to: The municipality you live in
Pre-question text: How strong is your connection to:
Literal question: The municipality you live in
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Experiment. All respondents are exposed to [r25_mlat_1] and [r25_mlat_5]- If [r25_mlmrc] == 1 [r25_mlat_3] and [r25_mlat_4] are also shown. If [r25_mlmrc] != 1 [r25_mlat_2] is also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strong connection 787 35.7% 0.357078040
2 Connection 801 36.3% 0.363430127
3 Some connection 382 17.3% 0.173321234
4 Small connection 197 8.9% 0.089382940
5 No connection 34 1.5% 0.015426497
97 Not answered 3 0.1% 0.001361162
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mlat_2


Variable label: How strong is your connection to: The county you live in
Pre-question text: How strong is your connection to:
Literal question: The county you live in
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Experiment. All respondents are exposed to [r25_mlat_1] and [r25_mlat_5]- If [r25_mlmrc] == 1 [r25_mlat_3] and [r25_mlat_4] are also shown. If [r25_mlmrc] != 1 [r25_mlat_2] is also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strong connection 194 28.2% 0.28238719
2 Connection 223 32.5% 0.32459971
3 Some connection 136 19.8% 0.19796215
4 Small connection 85 12.4% 0.12372635
5 No connection 31 4.5% 0.04512373
97 Not answered 18 2.6% 0.02620087
98 Not asked 13053 NA


r25_mlat_3


Variable label: How strong is your connection to: The county you lived in before it was merged
Pre-question text: How strong is your connection to:
Literal question: The county you lived in before it was merged
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Experiment. All respondents are exposed to [r25_mlat_1] and [r25_mlat_5]- If [r25_mlmrc] == 1 [r25_mlat_3] and [r25_mlat_4] are also shown. If [r25_mlmrc] != 1 [r25_mlat_2] is also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strong connection 348 22.9% 0.22940013
2 Connection 562 37.0% 0.37046803
3 Some connection 310 20.4% 0.20435069
4 Small connection 211 13.9% 0.13909031
5 No connection 61 4.0% 0.04021094
97 Not answered 25 1.6% 0.01647989
98 Not asked 12223 NA


r25_mlat_4


Variable label: How strong is your connection to: The county you live in after it was merged
Pre-question text: How strong is your connection to:
Literal question: The county you live in after it was merged
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Experiment. All respondents are exposed to [r25_mlat_1] and [r25_mlat_5]- If [r25_mlmrc] == 1 [r25_mlat_3] and [r25_mlat_4] are also shown. If [r25_mlmrc] != 1 [r25_mlat_2] is also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strong connection 134 8.8% 0.08833223
2 Connection 382 25.2% 0.25181279
3 Some connection 401 26.4% 0.26433751
4 Small connection 411 27.1% 0.27092947
5 No connection 158 10.4% 0.10415293
97 Not answered 31 2.0% 0.02043507
98 Not asked 12223 NA


r25_mlat_5


Variable label: How strong is your connection to: Norway
Pre-question text: How strong is your connection to:
Literal question: Norway
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Experiment. All respondents are exposed to [r25_mlat_1] and [r25_mlat_5]- If [r25_mlmrc] == 1 [r25_mlat_3] and [r25_mlat_4] are also shown. If [r25_mlmrc] != 1 [r25_mlat_2] is also shown.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strong connection 1650 74.9% 0.748638838
2 Connection 398 18.1% 0.180580762
3 Some connection 72 3.3% 0.032667877
4 Small connection 30 1.4% 0.013611615
5 No connection 2 0.1% 0.000907441
97 Not answered 52 2.4% 0.023593466
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_cpres


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality.
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree with the following statement:
Literal question: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 319 14.5% 0.144736842
2 Agree 758 34.4% 0.343920145
3 Agree somewhat 695 31.5% 0.315335753
4 Neither agree nor disagree 207 9.4% 0.093920145
5 Disagree somewhat 132 6.0% 0.059891107
6 Disagree 55 2.5% 0.024954628
7 Strongly disagree 34 1.5% 0.015426497
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001814882
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_pcrur


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
Literal question: Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 335 15.2% 0.151996370
2 Agree 523 23.7% 0.237295826
3 Agree somewhat 574 26.0% 0.260435572
4 Neither agree nor disagree 366 16.6% 0.166061706
5 Disagree somewhat 189 8.6% 0.085753176
6 Disagree 165 7.5% 0.074863884
7 Strongly disagree 46 2.1% 0.020871143
97 Not answered 6 0.3% 0.002722323
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_pcecr


Variable label: Economic situation in [r25_P2] compared to the rest of the country
Literal question: If you compare the economic situation [r25_P2] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation [r25_P2] as being better, the same or worse?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Better 531 24.1% 0.240925590
2 The same 1272 57.7% 0.577132486
3 Worse 380 17.2% 0.172413793
97 Not answered 21 1.0% 0.009528131
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mlsmc_1


Variable label: How strongly do you support: Further merging of counties.
Pre-question text:

Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January 2020. Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this has recently been the subject of debate. Some people support additional mergers, while others believe that county councils/municipalities should be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Yet others want the municipalities and county councils to remain as they are today.

How strongly do you support these various views?
Literal question: Further merging of counties.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Support very strongly 100 4.5% 0.04537205
2 Support strongly 128 5.8% 0.05807623
3 Support somewhat 259 11.8% 0.11751361
4 Neither support nor oppose 587 26.6% 0.26633394
5 Oppose somewhat 458 20.8% 0.20780399
6 Oppose strongly 381 17.3% 0.17286751
7 Oppose very strongly 257 11.7% 0.11660617
97 Not answered 34 1.5% 0.01542650
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mlsmc_2


Variable label: How strongly do you support: Retain the present number of counties.
Pre-question text:

Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January 2020. Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this has recently been the subject of debate. Some people support additional mergers, while others believe that county councils/municipalities should be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Yet others want the municipalities and county councils to remain as they are today.

How strongly do you support these various views?
Literal question: Retain the present number of counties.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Support very strongly 119 5.4% 0.05399274
2 Support strongly 229 10.4% 0.10390200
3 Support somewhat 403 18.3% 0.18284936
4 Neither support nor oppose 798 36.2% 0.36206897
5 Oppose somewhat 377 17.1% 0.17105263
6 Oppose strongly 133 6.0% 0.06034483
7 Oppose very strongly 99 4.5% 0.04491833
97 Not answered 46 2.1% 0.02087114
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mlsmc_3


Variable label: How strongly do you support: Give counties the opportunity to assume their original form.
Pre-question text:

Norway acquired a new municipal and county structure on 1 January 2020. Many municipalities and county councils have been merged and this has recently been the subject of debate. Some people support additional mergers, while others believe that county councils/municipalities should be given the opportunity to assume their original form. Yet others want the municipalities and county councils to remain as they are today.

How strongly do you support these various views?
Literal question: Give counties the opportunity to assume their original form.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Support very strongly 213 9.7% 0.09664247
2 Support strongly 292 13.2% 0.13248639
3 Support somewhat 475 21.6% 0.21551724
4 Neither support nor oppose 395 17.9% 0.17921960
5 Oppose somewhat 310 14.1% 0.14065336
6 Oppose strongly 226 10.3% 0.10254083
7 Oppose very strongly 261 11.8% 0.11842105
97 Not answered 32 1.5% 0.01451906
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mltar


Variable label: Division of tasks between authorities: County authorities
Pre-question text:

In addition to a debate on merging county municipalities, there is also a debate about which tasks should be undertaken by the state, the counties and the municipalities. If one level is assigned new tasks, it usually means that another level loses responsibility for those tasks.

Which of the following statements is closest to your point of view.
Literal question: County authorities
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 should have more tasks 311 14.1% 0.14110708
2 should keep the tasks that they have 1032 46.8% 0.46823956
3 should have fewer tasks 333 15.1% 0.15108893
4 should be closed down 477 21.6% 0.21642468
97 Not answered 51 2.3% 0.02313975
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mlcosx_rangroup


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects which group of questions the respondent will be exposed to.
Technical description: [Randomised for respondents not from Oslo] [If [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] == 1 the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcosx], [r25_mlcom], and [r25_mlcmr] in order. If [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] == 2 the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcosx], [r25_mlcos], and [r25_mlcsr] in order. If [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] == 3 the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcom], [r25_mlcmr], and [r25_mlcosx] in order. If [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] == 4 the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcos], [r25_mlcmr], and [r25_mlcosx] in order.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1877] [Invalid:11863] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group 1 447 23.8% 0.2381460
2 Group 2 486 25.9% 0.2589238
3 Group 3 494 26.3% 0.2631859
4 Group 4 450 24.0% 0.2397443
Sysmiss 11863 NA


r25_mlcosx_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_mlcosx]
Technical description: [Randomised for respondents not from Oslo]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1877] [Invalid:11863] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Consider that the Storting votes to divide [r25_P3] into two or more smaller counties. 617 32.9% 0.3287160
2 Consider that the Storting votes to divide [r25_P3] into two or more smaller counties after a referendum in the county shows that two-thirds of residents want partition. 643 34.3% 0.3425679
3 Consider that the Storting votes to divide [r25_P3] into two or more smaller counties after a referendum in the county shows that two-thirds of the representatives want partition. 617 32.9% 0.3287160
Sysmiss 11863 NA


r25_mlcosxo_rangroup


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects which group of questions the respondent will be exposed to.
Technical description: [Randomised for respondents from Oslo]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:314] [Invalid:13426] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group 1 78 24.8% 0.2484076
2 Group 2 81 25.8% 0.2579618
3 Group 3 85 27.1% 0.2707006
4 Group 4 70 22.3% 0.2229299
Sysmiss 13426 NA


r25_mlcosxo_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_mlcosxo]
Technical description: [Randomised for respondents from Oslo] [If r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] == 1 the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcosxo], [r25_mlcom], and [r25_mlcmr] in order. If r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] == 2 the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcosxo], [r25_mlcos], and [r25_mlcsr] in order. If r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] == 3 the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcom], [r25_mlcmr], and [r25_mlcosxo] in order. If r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] == 4 the respondent was exposed to [r25_mlcos], [r25_mlcsr], and [r25_mlcosxo] in order.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:314] [Invalid:13426] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Consider that the Storting votes to divide Viken into two or more smaller counties. 105 33.4% 0.3343949
2 Consider that the Storting votes to divide Viken into two or more smaller counties after a referendum in the county shows that two-thirds of residents want partition. 115 36.6% 0.3662420
3 Consider that the Storting votes to divide Viken into two or more smaller counties after a referendum in the county shows that two-thirds of the representatives want partition. 94 29.9% 0.2993631
Sysmiss 13426 NA


r25_mlcosx


Variable label: Acceptable/unacceptable: [r25_mlcosx_ran]
Pre-question text: [r25_mlcosx_ran]
Literal question: To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4] [Not posed to respondents from Oslo]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally acceptable 339 18.1% 0.180607352
2 Acceptable 393 20.9% 0.209376665
3 Not very acceptable 156 8.3% 0.083111348
4 Neither acceptable nor unacceptable 219 11.7% 0.116675546
5 Slightly unacceptable 153 8.2% 0.081513053
6 Unacceptable 336 17.9% 0.179009057
7 Completely unacceptable 265 14.1% 0.141182738
97 Not answered 16 0.9% 0.008524241
98 Not asked 11863 NA


r25_mlcosxo


Variable label: Acceptable/unacceptable: [r25_mlcosxo_ran]
Pre-question text: [r25_mlcosxo_ran]
Literal question: To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4] [Only posed to respondents from Oslo]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally acceptable 73 23.2% 0.23248408
2 Acceptable 78 24.8% 0.24840764
3 Not very acceptable 33 10.5% 0.10509554
4 Neither acceptable nor unacceptable 37 11.8% 0.11783439
5 Slightly unacceptable 27 8.6% 0.08598726
6 Unacceptable 42 13.4% 0.13375796
7 Completely unacceptable 21 6.7% 0.06687898
97 Not answered 3 1.0% 0.00955414
98 Not asked 13426 NA


r25_mlcsr_1


Variable label: How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county divisions: How merging affects local democracy.
Pre-question text: We would also like to know how important the following factors are for your opinion on county divisions:
Literal question: How merging affects local democracy.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 177 16.3% 0.16283349
2 Important 431 39.7% 0.39650414
3 Fairly important 279 25.7% 0.25666973
4 Slightly important 120 11.0% 0.11039558
5 Not important at all 56 5.2% 0.05151794
97 Not answered 24 2.2% 0.02207912
98 Not asked 12653 NA


r25_mlcsr_2


Variable label: How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county divisions: How merging affects county services (e.g. upper secondary education, county roads, dental health).
Pre-question text: We would also like to know how important the following factors are for your opinion on county divisions:
Literal question: How merging affects county services (e.g. upper secondary education, county roads, dental health).
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 214 19.7% 0.19687213
2 Important 457 42.0% 0.42042318
3 Fairly important 271 24.9% 0.24931003
4 Slightly important 79 7.3% 0.07267709
5 Not important at all 40 3.7% 0.03679853
97 Not answered 26 2.4% 0.02391904
98 Not asked 12653 NA


r25_mlcsr_3


Variable label: How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county divisions: How decisions about merging were made.
Pre-question text: We would also like to know how important the following factors are for your opinion on county divisions:
Literal question: How decisions about merging were made.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 194 17.8% 0.17847286
2 Important 414 38.1% 0.38086477
3 Fairly important 290 26.7% 0.26678933
4 Slightly important 114 10.5% 0.10487580
5 Not important at all 53 4.9% 0.04875805
97 Not answered 22 2.0% 0.02023919
98 Not asked 12653 NA


r25_mlcsr_4


Variable label: How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county divisions: How merging affects people’s regional identity.
Pre-question text: We would also like to know how important the following factors are for your opinion on county divisions:
Literal question: How merging affects people’s regional identity.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 136 12.5% 0.12511500
2 Important 332 30.5% 0.30542778
3 Fairly important 290 26.7% 0.26678933
4 Slightly important 213 19.6% 0.19595216
5 Not important at all 89 8.2% 0.08187672
97 Not answered 27 2.5% 0.02483901
98 Not asked 12653 NA


r25_mlcos_1


Variable label: Level of favour in arguments on division of counties: makes it harder for residents to be heard in county politics.
Pre-question text:

There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to dividing counties.

We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the following arguments.

Division of counties…
Literal question: makes it easier for residents to be heard in county politics.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree 100 9.2% 0.09199632
2 Agree 211 19.4% 0.19411224
3 Somewhat agree 217 20.0% 0.19963201
4 Neither agree nor disagree 293 27.0% 0.26954922
5 Somewhat disagree 89 8.2% 0.08187672
6 Disagree 109 10.0% 0.10027599
7 Completely disagree 52 4.8% 0.04783809
97 Not answered 16 1.5% 0.01471941
98 Not asked 12653 NA


r25_mlcos_2


Variable label: Level of favour in arguments on division of counties: makes county policy less adapted to the needs of residents.
Pre-question text:

There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to dividing counties.

We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the following arguments.

Division of counties…
Literal question: makes county policy more adapted to the needs of residents.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree 97 8.9% 0.08923643
2 Agree 202 18.6% 0.18583257
3 Somewhat agree 224 20.6% 0.20607176
4 Neither agree nor disagree 264 24.3% 0.24287029
5 Somewhat disagree 114 10.5% 0.10487580
6 Disagree 107 9.8% 0.09843606
7 Completely disagree 65 6.0% 0.05979761
97 Not answered 14 1.3% 0.01287948
98 Not asked 12653 NA


r25_mlcos_3


Variable label: Level of favour in arguments on division of counties: make county government spending more efficient.
Pre-question text:

There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to dividing counties.

We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the following arguments.

Division of counties…
Literal question: make county government spending less efficient.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree 108 9.9% 0.09935603
2 Agree 174 16.0% 0.16007360
3 Somewhat agree 197 18.1% 0.18123275
4 Neither agree nor disagree 309 28.4% 0.28426863
5 Somewhat disagree 125 11.5% 0.11499540
6 Disagree 101 9.3% 0.09291628
7 Completely disagree 55 5.1% 0.05059798
97 Not answered 18 1.7% 0.01655934
98 Not asked 12653 NA


r25_mlcos_4


Variable label: Level of favour in arguments on division of counties: increases the quality of county services (e.g. upper secondary education, county roads, dental health).
Pre-question text:

There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to dividing counties.

We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the following arguments.

Division of counties…
Literal question: reduces the quality of county services (e.g. upper secondary education, county roads, dental health).
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 2 | 4 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 2 | 4] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree 84 7.7% 0.07727691
2 Agree 136 12.5% 0.12511500
3 Somewhat agree 178 16.4% 0.16375345
4 Neither agree nor disagree 300 27.6% 0.27598896
5 Somewhat disagree 162 14.9% 0.14903404
6 Disagree 143 13.2% 0.13155474
7 Completely disagree 66 6.1% 0.06071757
97 Not answered 18 1.7% 0.01655934
98 Not asked 12653 NA


r25_mlcmr_1


Variable label: How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county mergers: How merging affects local democracy.
Pre-question text: We would also like to know how important the following factors are for your opinion on county mergers:
Literal question: How merging affects local democracy.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 207 18.8% 0.18750000
2 Important 432 39.1% 0.39130435
3 Fairly important 281 25.5% 0.25452899
4 Slightly important 107 9.7% 0.09692029
5 Not important at all 49 4.4% 0.04438406
97 Not answered 28 2.5% 0.02536232
98 Not asked 12636 NA


r25_mlcmr_2


Variable label: How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county mergers: How merging affects county services (e.g. upper secondary education, county roads, dental health).
Pre-question text: We would also like to know how important the following factors are for your opinion on county mergers:
Literal question: How merging affects county services (e.g. upper secondary education, county roads, dental health).
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 230 20.8% 0.20833333
2 Important 518 46.9% 0.46920290
3 Fairly important 242 21.9% 0.21920290
4 Slightly important 63 5.7% 0.05706522
5 Not important at all 27 2.4% 0.02445652
97 Not answered 24 2.2% 0.02173913
98 Not asked 12636 NA


r25_mlcmr_3


Variable label: How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county mergers: How decisions about merging were made.
Pre-question text: We would also like to know how important the following factors are for your opinion on county mergers:
Literal question: How decisions about merging were made.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 222 20.1% 0.20108696
2 Important 417 37.8% 0.37771739
3 Fairly important 279 25.3% 0.25271739
4 Slightly important 106 9.6% 0.09601449
5 Not important at all 52 4.7% 0.04710145
97 Not answered 28 2.5% 0.02536232
98 Not asked 12636 NA


r25_mlcmr_4


Variable label: How important are the following factors are for your opinion on county mergers: How merging affects people’s regional identity.
Pre-question text: We would also like to know how important the following factors are for your opinion on county mergers:
Literal question: How merging affects people’s regional identity.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 153 13.9% 0.13858696
2 Important 319 28.9% 0.28894928
3 Fairly important 304 27.5% 0.27536232
4 Slightly important 198 17.9% 0.17934783
5 Not important at all 103 9.3% 0.09329710
97 Not answered 27 2.4% 0.02445652
98 Not asked 12636 NA


r25_mlcom_1


Variable label: Level of favour in arguments on merging of counties: makes it harder for residents to be heard in county politics.
Pre-question text:

There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to merging counties.

We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the following arguments.

Merging of counties…

Literal question: makes it harder for residents to be heard in county politics.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree 134 12.1% 0.12137681
2 Agree 258 23.4% 0.23369565
3 Somewhat agree 280 25.4% 0.25362319
4 Neither agree nor disagree 244 22.1% 0.22101449
5 Somewhat disagree 81 7.3% 0.07336957
6 Disagree 69 6.2% 0.06250000
7 Completely disagree 25 2.3% 0.02264493
97 Not answered 13 1.2% 0.01177536
98 Not asked 12636 NA


r25_mlcom_2


Variable label: Level of favour in arguments on merging of counties: makes county policy less adapted to the needs of residents.
Pre-question text:

There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to merging counties.

We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the following arguments.

Merging of counties…

Literal question: makes county policy less adapted to the needs of residents.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree 126 11.4% 0.11413043
2 Agree 227 20.6% 0.20561594
3 Somewhat agree 255 23.1% 0.23097826
4 Neither agree nor disagree 267 24.2% 0.24184783
5 Somewhat disagree 115 10.4% 0.10416667
6 Disagree 71 6.4% 0.06431159
7 Completely disagree 31 2.8% 0.02807971
97 Not answered 12 1.1% 0.01086957
98 Not asked 12636 NA


r25_mlcom_3


Variable label: Level of favour in arguments on merging of counties: make county government spending more efficient.
Pre-question text:

There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to merging counties.

We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the following arguments.

Merging of counties…

Literal question: make county government spending more efficient.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree 81 7.3% 0.07336957
2 Agree 157 14.2% 0.14221014
3 Somewhat agree 209 18.9% 0.18931159
4 Neither agree nor disagree 301 27.3% 0.27264493
5 Somewhat disagree 163 14.8% 0.14764493
6 Disagree 127 11.5% 0.11503623
7 Completely disagree 52 4.7% 0.04710145
97 Not answered 14 1.3% 0.01268116
98 Not asked 12636 NA


r25_mlcom_4


Variable label: Level of favour in arguments on merging of counties: increases the quality of county services (e.g. upper secondary education, county roads, dental health).
Pre-question text:

There may be many reasons for being in favour of or opposed to merging counties.

We would like to know the extent to which you agree with the following arguments.

Merging of counties…

Literal question: increases the quality of county services (e.g. upper secondary education, county roads, dental health).
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] == 1 and [r25_mlcosx_rangroup] = 1 | 3 or [r25_mlcosxo_rangroup] = 1 | 3] [Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree 66 6.0% 0.05978261
2 Agree 147 13.3% 0.13315217
3 Somewhat agree 189 17.1% 0.17119565
4 Neither agree nor disagree 333 30.2% 0.30163043
5 Somewhat disagree 161 14.6% 0.14583333
6 Disagree 142 12.9% 0.12862319
7 Completely disagree 53 4.8% 0.04800725
97 Not answered 13 1.2% 0.01177536
98 Not asked 12636 NA


r25_mlser_1


Variable label: Satisfaction with public services: Primary and lower secondary school (Years 1 to 10)
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

How satisfied are you with the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Primary and lower secondary school (Years 1 to 10)
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Shown on the same page as [r25_mlseq_1_1] - [r25_mlseq_6_3]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 115 5.2% 0.05217786
2 Satisfied 798 36.2% 0.36206897
3 Somewhat satisfied 405 18.4% 0.18375681
4 Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 550 25.0% 0.24954628
5 Somewhat dissatisfied 174 7.9% 0.07894737
6 Dissatisfied 65 2.9% 0.02949183
7 Very dissatisfied 36 1.6% 0.01633394
97 Not answered 61 2.8% 0.02767695
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mlser_2


Variable label: Satisfaction with public services: Upper secondary school
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

How satisfied are you with the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Upper secondary school
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Shown on the same page as [r25_mlseq_1_1] - [r25_mlseq_6_3]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 118 5.4% 0.053539020
2 Satisfied 843 38.2% 0.382486388
3 Somewhat satisfied 410 18.6% 0.186025408
4 Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 602 27.3% 0.273139746
5 Somewhat dissatisfied 119 5.4% 0.053992740
6 Dissatisfied 35 1.6% 0.015880218
7 Very dissatisfied 14 0.6% 0.006352087
97 Not answered 63 2.9% 0.028584392
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mlser_3


Variable label: Satisfaction with public services: Higher education (university/university college)
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

How satisfied are you with the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Higher education (university/university college)
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Shown on the same page as [r25_mlseq_1_1] - [r25_mlseq_6_3]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 190 8.6% 0.086206897
2 Satisfied 976 44.3% 0.442831216
3 Somewhat satisfied 339 15.4% 0.153811252
4 Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 533 24.2% 0.241833031
5 Somewhat dissatisfied 76 3.4% 0.034482759
6 Dissatisfied 26 1.2% 0.011796733
7 Very dissatisfied 6 0.3% 0.002722323
97 Not answered 58 2.6% 0.026315789
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mlser_4


Variable label: Satisfaction with public services: Hospitals
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

How satisfied are you with the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Hospitals
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Shown on the same page as [r25_mlseq_1_1] - [r25_mlseq_6_3]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 240 10.9% 0.10889292
2 Satisfied 924 41.9% 0.41923775
3 Somewhat satisfied 426 19.3% 0.19328494
4 Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 238 10.8% 0.10798548
5 Somewhat dissatisfied 210 9.5% 0.09528131
6 Dissatisfied 91 4.1% 0.04128857
7 Very dissatisfied 31 1.4% 0.01406534
97 Not answered 44 2.0% 0.01996370
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mlser_5


Variable label: Satisfaction with public services: Home care service for the elderly and people with disabilities
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

How satisfied are you with the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Home care service for the elderly and people with disabilities
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Shown on the same page as [r25_mlseq_1_1] - [r25_mlseq_6_3]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 48 2.2% 0.02177858
2 Satisfied 375 17.0% 0.17014519
3 Somewhat satisfied 408 18.5% 0.18511797
4 Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 644 29.2% 0.29219601
5 Somewhat dissatisfied 397 18.0% 0.18012704
6 Dissatisfied 216 9.8% 0.09800363
7 Very dissatisfied 66 3.0% 0.02994555
97 Not answered 50 2.3% 0.02268603
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mlser_6


Variable label: Satisfaction with public services: Patient transport (e.g. by ambulance, taxi, helicopter)
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

How satisfied are you with the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Patient transport (e.g. by ambulance, taxi, helicopter)
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 1]

[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]

[Shown on the same page as [r25_mlseq_1_1] - [r25_mlseq_6_3]]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 121 5.5% 0.05490018
2 Satisfied 618 28.0% 0.28039927
3 Somewhat satisfied 332 15.1% 0.15063521
4 Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 716 32.5% 0.32486388
5 Somewhat dissatisfied 203 9.2% 0.09210526
6 Dissatisfied 112 5.1% 0.05081670
7 Very dissatisfied 43 2.0% 0.01950998
97 Not answered 59 2.7% 0.02676951
98 Not asked 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_1_1


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for primary and lower secondary school: the municipality
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for primary and lower secondary school: the municipality
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1627 73.8% 0.73820327
0 Not selected 547 24.8% 0.24818512
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_1_2


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for primary and lower secondary school: the county municipality
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for primary and lower secondary school: the county municipality
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 367 16.7% 0.16651543
0 Not selected 1807 82.0% 0.81987296
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_1_3


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for primary and lower secondary school: the state
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for primary and lower secondary school: the state
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 513 23.3% 0.23275862
0 Not selected 1661 75.4% 0.75362976
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_2_1


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for upper secondary school: the municipality
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for upper secondary school: the municipality
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 315 14.3% 0.14292196
0 Not selected 1859 84.3% 0.84346642
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_2_2


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for upper secondary school: the county municipality
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for upper secondary school: the county municipality
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1602 72.7% 0.72686025
0 Not selected 572 26.0% 0.25952813
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_2_3


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for upper secondary school: the state
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for upper secondary school: the state
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 565 25.6% 0.25635209
0 Not selected 1609 73.0% 0.73003630
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_3_1


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for higher education: the municipality
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for higher education: the municipality
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 100 4.5% 0.04537205
0 Not selected 2074 94.1% 0.94101633
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_3_2


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for higher education: the county municipality
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for higher education: the county municipality
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 576 26.1% 0.26134301
0 Not selected 1598 72.5% 0.72504537
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_3_3


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for higher education: the state
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for higher education: the state
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1728 78.4% 0.78402904
0 Not selected 446 20.2% 0.20235935
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_4_1


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for hospitals: the municipality
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for hospitals: the municipality
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 188 8.5% 0.08529946
0 Not selected 1986 90.1% 0.90108893
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_4_2


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for hospitals: the county municipality
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for hospitals: the county municipality
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 752 34.1% 0.34119782
0 Not selected 1422 64.5% 0.64519056
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_4_3


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for hospitals: the state
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for hospitals: the state
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1611 73.1% 0.73094374
0 Not selected 563 25.5% 0.25544465
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_5_1


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for home care service for the elderly and people with disabilities: the municipality
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for home care service for the elderly and people with disabilities: the municipality
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1822 82.7% 0.82667877
0 Not selected 352 16.0% 0.15970962
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_5_2


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for home care service for the elderly and people with disabilities: the county municipality
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for home care service for the elderly and people with disabilities: the county municipality
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 287 13.0% 0.13021779
0 Not selected 1887 85.6% 0.85617060
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_5_3


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for home care service for the elderly and people with disabilities: the state
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for home care service for the elderly and people with disabilities: the state
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 408 18.5% 0.18511797
0 Not selected 1766 80.1% 0.80127042
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_6_1


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for patient transport: the municipality
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for patient transport: the municipality
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 657 29.8% 0.29809437
0 Not selected 1517 68.8% 0.68829401
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_6_2


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for patient transport: the county municipality
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for patient transport: the county municipality
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1039 47.1% 0.47141561
0 Not selected 1135 51.5% 0.51497278
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_mlseq_6_3


Variable label: Responsible for the quality of public services for patient transport: the state
Pre-question text:

In the following questions, we would like to know the extent to which you are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the authorities and what level of authority you believe is responsible for the quality of these public services.

Which official level(s) do you hold responsible for the quality of the following public services?
Literal question: Responsible for the quality of public services for patient transport: the state
Post-question: You can choose between the municipality, county municipality, state or a combination of these.
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 846 38.4% 0.38384755
0 Not selected 1328 60.3% 0.60254083
97 30 1.4% 0.01361162
98 11536 NA


r25_dvrepx_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects which group the respondents will belong to.
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8966] [Invalid:4774] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group 1: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx1] 992 11.1% 0.1106402
2 Group 2: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx2] 1002 11.2% 0.1117555
3 Group 3: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx3] 988 11.0% 0.1101941
4 Group 4: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx4] 1016 11.3% 0.1133170
5 Group 5: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx5] 973 10.9% 0.1085211
6 Group 6: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx6] 994 11.1% 0.1108633
7 Group 7: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx7] 981 10.9% 0.1094133
8 Group 8: Exposed to [r25_dvrepx8] 981 10.9% 0.1094133
9 Group 9: Control group 1039 11.6% 0.1158822
Sysmiss 4774 NA


r25_dvrepx1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: limit the opportunities for family reunification
Pre-question text: Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration policies substantially.
Literal question: A main policy would be to limit the opportunities for family reunification.
Technical description: [Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 1 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Agree 146 14.7% 0.147177419
2 Somewhat agree 253 25.5% 0.255040323
3 Somewhat disagree 330 33.3% 0.332661290
4 Disagree 260 26.2% 0.262096774
97 Not answered 3 0.3% 0.003024194
98 Not asked 12748 NA


r25_dvrepx2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: cuts in financial support for asylum seekers at reception centres
Pre-question text: Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration policies substantially.
Literal question: A main policy would be cuts in financial support for asylum seekers living at asylum reception centres. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposal?
Technical description: [Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 2 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Agree 93 9.3% 0.092814371
2 Somewhat agree 245 24.5% 0.244510978
3 Somewhat disagree 344 34.3% 0.343313373
4 Disagree 319 31.8% 0.318363273
97 Not answered 1 0.1% 0.000998004
98 Not asked 12738 NA


r25_dvrepx3


Variable label: Agree/disagree: stricter language requirements in Norwegian in order to be granted citizenship
Pre-question text: Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration policies substantially.
Literal question: A main policy would be stricter language requirements in Norwegian in order to be granted citizenship. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposal?
Technical description: [Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 3 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Agree 281 28.4% 0.284412955
2 Somewhat agree 374 37.9% 0.378542510
3 Somewhat disagree 216 21.9% 0.218623482
4 Disagree 112 11.3% 0.113360324
97 Not answered 5 0.5% 0.005060729
98 Not asked 12752 NA


r25_dvrepx4


Variable label: Agree/disagree: limit the opportunities for family reunification, cuts in financial support for asylum seekers at asylum reception centres and stricter language requirements in Norwegian in order to be granted citizenship
Pre-question text: Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration policies substantially.
Literal question: The main policies would be to limit the opportunities for family reunification, cuts in financial support for asylum seekers at asylum reception centres and stricter language requirements in Norwegian in order to be granted citizenship. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposal?
Technical description: [Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 4 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Agree 171 16.8% 0.168307087
2 Somewhat agree 328 32.3% 0.322834646
3 Somewhat disagree 277 27.3% 0.272637795
4 Disagree 238 23.4% 0.234251969
97 Not answered 2 0.2% 0.001968504
98 Not asked 12724 NA


r25_dvrepx5


Variable label: Agree/disagree: extend the opportunities for family reunification
Pre-question text: Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration policies substantially.
Literal question: A main policy would be to extend the opportunities for family reunification. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposal?
Technical description: [Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 5 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Agree 221 22.7% 0.227132580
2 Somewhat agree 421 43.3% 0.432682425
3 Somewhat disagree 210 21.6% 0.215827338
4 Disagree 115 11.8% 0.118191161
97 Not answered 6 0.6% 0.006166495
98 Not asked 12767 NA


r25_dvrepx6


Variable label: Agree/disagree: increase in financial support for asylum seekers in asylum reception centres
Pre-question text: Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration policies substantially.
Literal question: A main policy would be increase in financial support for asylum seekers living at asylum reception centres. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposal?
Technical description: [Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 6 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Agree 243 24.4% 0.244466801
2 Somewhat agree 466 46.9% 0.468812877
3 Somewhat disagree 181 18.2% 0.182092555
4 Disagree 101 10.2% 0.101609658
97 Not answered 3 0.3% 0.003018109
98 Not asked 12746 NA


r25_dvrepx7


Variable label: Agree/disagree: simpler language requirements in Norwegian in order to be granted citizenship
Pre-question text: Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration policies substantially.
Literal question: A main policy would be simpler language requirements in Norwegian in order to be granted citizenship. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposal?
Technical description: [Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 7 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Agree 141 14.4% 0.143730887
2 Somewhat agree 301 30.7% 0.306829766
3 Somewhat disagree 295 30.1% 0.300713558
4 Disagree 240 24.5% 0.244648318
97 Not answered 4 0.4% 0.004077472
98 Not asked 12759 NA


r25_dvrepx8


Variable label: Agree/disagree: expand the opportunities for family reunification, increase in financial support for asylum seekers living at asylumreception centres and simpler language requirements in Norwegian in order to be granted citizenship
Pre-question text: Consider the following scenario taking place in the next election period. Due to war and conflict in the world, Norway is once again experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers. In a speech, the Prime Minister announces that the Government will address this situation by tightening/relaxing immigration and integration policies substantially.
Literal question: The main policies would be to expand the opportunities for family reunification, increase the financial support for asylum seekers living at asylum reception centres and simpler language requirements in Norwegian in order to be granted citizenship. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposal?
Technical description: [Asked if r25dvrepx_ran = 8 & r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Agree 151 15.4% 0.153924567
2 Somewhat agree 424 43.2% 0.432212029
3 Somewhat disagree 267 27.2% 0.272171254
4 Disagree 138 14.1% 0.140672783
97 Not answered 1 0.1% 0.001019368
98 Not asked 12759 NA


r25_dveas_pipe1


Variable label: Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dveas_pipe2]
Technical description: [If [r25_dvrepx_ran] = 1 | 2 | 3 |4 the value is set to 1. If [r25_dvrepx_ran] = 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 the value is set to 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7924] [Invalid:5816] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 tightening 3997 50.4% 0.504417
2 relaxation 3927 49.6% 0.495583
Sysmiss 5816 NA


r25_dveas_pipe2


Variable label: Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_dveas] and [r25_dvcas]
Technical description: [If [r25_dvrepx_ran] = 1 | 2 | 3 |4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 the value is set to 1. Hvis [r25_dvrepx_ran] == 9 settes verdien til 2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8963] [Invalid:4777] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 With such a [r25_dveas_pipe1] immigration and integration policy would 7924 88.4% 0.884079
2 Would 1039 11.6% 0.115921
Sysmiss 4777 NA


r25_dveas


Variable label: [r25_dveas_pipe2] good or bad for the Norwegian economy that asylum seekers come from other countries settle here
Literal question: [r25_dveas_pipe2] you say that it is good or bad for the Norwegian economy that asylum seekers come from other countries settle here?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 – Bad for the economy 644 7.1% 0.07084708
1 1 253 2.8% 0.02783278
2 2 487 5.4% 0.05357536
3 3 809 8.9% 0.08899890
4 4 907 10.0% 0.09977998
5 5 2171 23.9% 0.23883388
6 6 1060 11.7% 0.11661166
7 7 1195 13.1% 0.13146315
8 8 815 9.0% 0.08965897
9 9 186 2.0% 0.02046205
10 10 – Good for the economy 389 4.3% 0.04279428
97 Not answered 174 1.9% 0.01914191
98 Not asked 4650 NA


r25_dvcas


Variable label: [r25_dveas_pipe2] Norwegian culture is undermined or enriched by asylum seekers who come from other countries to settle here
Literal question: [r25_dveas_pipe2] you say that Norwegian culture is undermined or enriched by asylum seekers who come from other countries to settle here?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 1,3,4,5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 – Norwegian culture would be undermined 586 6.4% 0.06446645
1 1 252 2.8% 0.02772277
2 2 420 4.6% 0.04620462
3 3 645 7.1% 0.07095710
4 4 661 7.3% 0.07271727
5 5 1746 19.2% 0.19207921
6 6 983 10.8% 0.10814081
7 7 1274 14.0% 0.14015402
8 8 1075 11.8% 0.11826183
9 9 355 3.9% 0.03905391
10 10 – Norwegian culture would be enriched 892 9.8% 0.09812981
97 Not answered 201 2.2% 0.02211221
98 Not asked 4650 NA


r25_pccop


Variable label: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Literal question: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A very high degree 82 3.4% 0.034095634
2 A high degree 887 36.9% 0.368814969
3 Some degree 967 40.2% 0.402079002
4 A low degree 371 15.4% 0.154261954
5 Not at all 95 4.0% 0.039501040
97 Not answered 3 0.1% 0.001247401
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_pccos


Variable label: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A very high degree 196 8.1% 0.08149688
2 A high degree 1086 45.2% 0.45155925
3 Some degree 763 31.7% 0.31725572
4 A low degree 267 11.1% 0.11101871
5 Not at all 67 2.8% 0.02785863
97 Not answered 26 1.1% 0.01081081
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_pccom


Variable label: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A very high degree 161 6.7% 0.066943867
2 A high degree 1052 43.7% 0.437422037
3 Some degree 912 37.9% 0.379209979
4 A low degree 220 9.1% 0.091476091
5 Not at all 41 1.7% 0.017047817
97 Not answered 19 0.8% 0.007900208
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_metnc_1


Variable label: Confidence in the following Norwegian media: Finansavisen
Pre-question text: To what extent do you have confidence in the following Norwegian media?
Literal question: Finansavisen
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 96 4.0% 0.039916840
2 To a large extent 701 29.1% 0.291476091
3 To some extent 549 22.8% 0.228274428
4 To a small extent 88 3.7% 0.036590437
5 Not at all 33 1.4% 0.013721414
6 Not familiar with this medium 919 38.2% 0.382120582
97 Not answered 19 0.8% 0.007900208
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_metnc_2


Variable label: Confidence in the following Norwegian media: VG
Pre-question text: To what extent do you have confidence in the following Norwegian media?
Literal question: VG
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 71 3.0% 0.029521830
2 To a large extent 549 22.8% 0.228274428
3 To some extent 1147 47.7% 0.476923077
4 To a small extent 477 19.8% 0.198336798
5 Not at all 85 3.5% 0.035343035
6 Not familiar with this medium 57 2.4% 0.023700624
97 Not answered 19 0.8% 0.007900208
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_metnc_3


Variable label: Confidence in the following Norwegian media: Resett
Pre-question text: To what extent do you have confidence in the following Norwegian media?
Literal question: Resett
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 12 0.5% 0.004989605
2 To a large extent 57 2.4% 0.023700624
3 To some extent 172 7.2% 0.071517672
4 To a small extent 283 11.8% 0.117671518
5 Not at all 440 18.3% 0.182952183
6 Not familiar with this medium 1415 58.8% 0.588357588
97 Not answered 26 1.1% 0.010810811
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_metnc_4


Variable label: Confidence in the following Norwegian media: Klassekampen
Pre-question text: To what extent do you have confidence in the following Norwegian media?
Literal question: Klassekampen
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 107 4.4% 0.044490644
2 To a large extent 515 21.4% 0.214137214
3 To some extent 575 23.9% 0.239085239
4 To a small extent 201 8.4% 0.083575884
5 Not at all 104 4.3% 0.043243243
6 Not familiar with this medium 882 36.7% 0.366735967
97 Not answered 21 0.9% 0.008731809
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_pccoo


Variable label: Most people in general can be trusted
Literal question: Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Cannot be careful enough 25 1.0% 0.010395010
1 1 16 0.7% 0.006652807
2 2 36 1.5% 0.014968815
3 3 87 3.6% 0.036174636
4 4 89 3.7% 0.037006237
5 5 242 10.1% 0.100623701
6 6 291 12.1% 0.120997921
7 7 568 23.6% 0.236174636
8 8 586 24.4% 0.243659044
9 9 224 9.3% 0.093139293
10 10 – Most people can be trusted 237 9.9% 0.098544699
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001663202
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_pcsad


Variable label: How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 536 22.3% 0.222869023
2 Satisfied 1202 50.0% 0.499792100
3 Somewhat satisfied 440 18.3% 0.182952183
4 Dissatisfied 167 6.9% 0.069438669
5 Very dissatisfied 48 2.0% 0.019958420
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.004989605
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_pcsal


Variable label: How satisfied are you with life
Literal question: All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 728 30.3% 0.302702703
2 Satisfied 1311 54.5% 0.545114345
3 Somewhat satisfied 270 11.2% 0.112266112
4 Dissatisfied 64 2.7% 0.026611227
5 Very dissatisfied 21 0.9% 0.008731809
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.004573805
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_pcsaf


Variable label: How much safer or more unsafe has your local environment become
Pre-question text: Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
Literal question: How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much safer 68 2.8% 0.028274428
2 Somewhat safer 263 10.9% 0.109355509
3 No change in safity 1465 60.9% 0.609147609
4 Somewhat more unsafe 532 22.1% 0.221205821
5 Much more unsafe 66 2.7% 0.027442827
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.004573805
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_pcmip_1


Variable label: Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? (1)
Pre-question text: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Literal question: 1:
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_pcmip_2


Variable label: Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? (2)
Pre-question text: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Literal question: 2:
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_pcmip_3


Variable label: Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally? (3)
Pre-question text: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Literal question: 3:
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_pcvot21


Variable label: Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in 2021
Literal question: Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in 2021
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 6]

[Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 65 2.7% 0.02702703
2 The Conservative Party 447 18.6% 0.18586279
3 The Progress Party 153 6.4% 0.06361746
4 The Liberal Party 116 4.8% 0.04823285
5 The Socialist Left Party 174 7.2% 0.07234927
6 The Centre Party 245 10.2% 0.10187110
7 The Green Party 138 5.7% 0.05738046
8 The Labour Party 549 22.8% 0.22827443
9 The Red Party 147 6.1% 0.06112266
10 Other: 62 2.6% 0.02577963
11 Did not vote 115 4.8% 0.04781705
12 Not entitled to vote 146 6.1% 0.06070686
13 Voted blank 24 1.0% 0.00997921
97 Not answered 24 1.0% 0.00997921
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_pcvot21_10_other


Variable label: Other: Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in 2021
Pre-question text: Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in 2021
Literal question: Other
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 6]

[Answer list display order: Randomized]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_pcldk


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Christian Democratic Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2343] [Invalid:11397] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 349 14.9% 0.148954332
2 Really dislike 445 19.0% 0.189927443
3 Dislike somewhat 517 22.1% 0.220657277
4 Neither dislike nor like 619 26.4% 0.264191208
5 Like somewhat 306 13.1% 0.130601793
6 Really like 86 3.7% 0.036705079
7 Intensely like 21 0.9% 0.008962868
Sysmiss 11397 NA


r25_pcldh


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Conservative Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2343] [Invalid:11397] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 106 4.5% 0.04524114
2 Really dislike 250 10.7% 0.10670081
3 Dislike somewhat 397 16.9% 0.16944089
4 Neither dislike nor like 379 16.2% 0.16175843
5 Like somewhat 594 25.4% 0.25352113
6 Really like 478 20.4% 0.20401195
7 Intensely like 139 5.9% 0.05932565
Sysmiss 11397 NA


r25_pcldf


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Progress Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Progress Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2341] [Invalid:11399] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 597 25.5% 0.25501922
2 Really dislike 462 19.7% 0.19735156
3 Dislike somewhat 366 15.6% 0.15634344
4 Neither dislike nor like 299 12.8% 0.12772320
5 Like somewhat 364 15.5% 0.15548911
6 Really like 186 7.9% 0.07945323
7 Intensely like 67 2.9% 0.02862025
Sysmiss 11399 NA


r25_pcldv


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Liberal Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2332] [Invalid:11408] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 148 6.3% 0.06346484
2 Really dislike 265 11.4% 0.11363636
3 Dislike somewhat 445 19.1% 0.19082333
4 Neither dislike nor like 731 31.3% 0.31346484
5 Like somewhat 530 22.7% 0.22727273
6 Really like 179 7.7% 0.07675815
7 Intensely like 34 1.5% 0.01457976
Sysmiss 11408 NA


r25_pcldsv


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Socialist Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Socialist Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2341] [Invalid:11399] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 240 10.3% 0.10252029
2 Really dislike 308 13.2% 0.13156771
3 Dislike somewhat 395 16.9% 0.16873131
4 Neither dislike nor like 539 23.0% 0.23024349
5 Like somewhat 474 20.2% 0.20247757
6 Really like 300 12.8% 0.12815036
7 Intensely like 85 3.6% 0.03630927
Sysmiss 11399 NA


r25_pcldsp


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Centre Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Centre Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2340] [Invalid:11400] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 282 12.1% 0.12051282
2 Really dislike 388 16.6% 0.16581197
3 Dislike somewhat 533 22.8% 0.22777778
4 Neither dislike nor like 609 26.0% 0.26025641
5 Like somewhat 382 16.3% 0.16324786
6 Really like 123 5.3% 0.05256410
7 Intensely like 23 1.0% 0.00982906
Sysmiss 11400 NA


r25_pcldm


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Green Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Green Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2343] [Invalid:11397] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 457 19.5% 0.19504908
2 Really dislike 329 14.0% 0.14041827
3 Dislike somewhat 375 16.0% 0.16005122
4 Neither dislike nor like 402 17.2% 0.17157490
5 Like somewhat 489 20.9% 0.20870679
6 Really like 239 10.2% 0.10200598
7 Intensely like 52 2.2% 0.02219377
Sysmiss 11397 NA


r25_pclda


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Labour Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Labour Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2346] [Invalid:11394] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 187 8.0% 0.07971014
2 Really dislike 247 10.5% 0.10528559
3 Dislike somewhat 415 17.7% 0.17689685
4 Neither dislike nor like 329 14.0% 0.14023870
5 Like somewhat 682 29.1% 0.29070759
6 Really like 432 18.4% 0.18414322
7 Intensely like 54 2.3% 0.02301790
Sysmiss 11394 NA


r25_pcldr


Variable label: Like or dislike party: The Red Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Red Party
Post-question: Click on your desired answer
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2341] [Invalid:11399] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 374 16.0% 0.15976079
2 Really dislike 352 15.0% 0.15036309
3 Dislike somewhat 386 16.5% 0.16488680
4 Neither dislike nor like 455 19.4% 0.19436138
5 Like somewhat 454 19.4% 0.19393422
6 Really like 242 10.3% 0.10337463
7 Intensely like 78 3.3% 0.03331909
Sysmiss 11399 NA


r25_bglrs


Variable label: Personal placement on political left and right wing scale
Pre-question text: In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical description: [Respondent answered with the help of a slider]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2298] [Invalid:11442] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 – Left wing 74 3.2% 0.03220191
1 1 130 5.7% 0.05657093
2 2 193 8.4% 0.08398607
3 3 280 12.2% 0.12184508
4 4 272 11.8% 0.11836379
5 5 405 17.6% 0.17624021
6 6 247 10.7% 0.10748477
7 7 298 13.0% 0.12967798
8 8 221 9.6% 0.09617058
9 9 92 4.0% 0.04003481
10 10 – Right wing 86 3.7% 0.03742385
Sysmiss 11442 NA


r25_pcimm


Variable label: Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
Literal question: In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A very great advantage 116 4.8% 0.04823285
2 A great advantage 448 18.6% 0.18627859
3 A slight advantage 903 37.5% 0.37546778
4 Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage 421 17.5% 0.17505198
5 A slight disadvantage 341 14.2% 0.14178794
6 A great disadvantage 96 4.0% 0.03991684
7 A very great disadvantage 45 1.9% 0.01871102
97 Not answered 35 1.5% 0.01455301
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_pcpin


Variable label: How interested are you in politics?
Literal question: In general, how interested are you in politics?
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 274 11.4% 0.11392931
2 Interested 950 39.5% 0.39501040
3 Somewhat interested 787 32.7% 0.32723493
4 Not very interested 299 12.4% 0.12432432
5 Not interested at all 62 2.6% 0.02577963
97 Not answered 33 1.4% 0.01372141
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_pcter


Variable label: To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Literal question: To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 152 6.3% 0.06320166
2 To a great extent 401 16.7% 0.16673597
3 Somewhat 1005 41.8% 0.41787942
4 Slightly 682 28.4% 0.28357588
5 Not at all 123 5.1% 0.05114345
97 Not answered 42 1.7% 0.01746362
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_metnsx_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects which group the respondent will belong to.
Technical description: [Randomized if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2375] [Invalid:11365] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group 1 (Finansavisen, control) 573 24.1% 0.2412632
2 Group 2 (Klassekampen, control) 599 25.2% 0.2522105
3 Group 3 (Finansavisen, treatment) 607 25.6% 0.2555789
4 Group 4 (Klassekampen, treatment) 596 25.1% 0.2509474
Sysmiss 11365 NA


r25_metnsx_pipe


Variable label: Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r25_metnsx1] - [r25_metnsx4], and [r25_metnpx]
Technical description: [If [r25_metnsx_ran] = 1 | 3 the value is set to 1. If [r25_metnsx_ran] = 2 | 4 the value is set to 2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2375] [Invalid:11365] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Finansavisen 1180 49.7% 0.4968421
2 Klassekampen 1195 50.3% 0.5031579
Sysmiss 11365 NA


r25_metnsx1


Variable label: Level of reliability: article published by Finansavisen
Pre-question text:

Look at this article published by Finansavisen

[image of news article posted on social media]
Literal question: To what extent do you think that this news is reliable?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_metnsx_ran = 1 & r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 15 2.6% 0.02617801
2 To a large extent 106 18.5% 0.18499127
3 To some extent 236 41.2% 0.41186736
4 To a small extent 166 29.0% 0.28970332
5 Not at all 39 6.8% 0.06806283
97 Not answered 11 1.9% 0.01919721
98 Not asked 13167 NA


r25_metnsx2


Variable label: Level of reliability: article published by Klassekampen
Pre-question text:

Look at this article published by Klassekampen

[image of news article posted on social media]
Literal question: To what extent do you think that this news is reliable?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_metnsx_ran = 2 & r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 18 3.0% 0.03005008
2 To a large extent 125 20.9% 0.20868114
3 To some extent 245 40.9% 0.40901503
4 To a small extent 166 27.7% 0.27712855
5 Not at all 32 5.3% 0.05342237
97 Not answered 13 2.2% 0.02170284
98 Not asked 13141 NA


r25_metnsx3


Variable label: Level of reliability: article published by Finansavisen and shared by a politican from the Labour party
Pre-question text:

Look at this article published by Finansavisen and consider it being shared and commented on by a fictional politician from the Labour Party.

[image of news article posted on social media]
Literal question: Please read carefully and then answer the extent to which you find this news reliable?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_metnsx_ran = 3 & r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 17 2.8% 0.02800659
2 To a large extent 72 11.9% 0.11861614
3 To some extent 265 43.7% 0.43657331
4 To a small extent 187 30.8% 0.30807249
5 Not at all 38 6.3% 0.06260297
97 Not answered 28 4.6% 0.04612850
98 Not asked 13133 NA


r25_metnsx4


Variable label: Level of reliability: article published by Klassekampen and shared by a politician from The Progress Party
Pre-question text:

Look at this article published by Klassekampen and consider it being shared and commented on by a fictional politician from the Progress Party.

[image of news article posted on social media]
Literal question: Please read carefully and then answer the extent to which you find this news reliable?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_metnsx_ran = 4 & r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 15 2.5% 0.02516779
2 To a large extent 90 15.1% 0.15100671
3 To some extent 237 39.8% 0.39765101
4 To a small extent 188 31.5% 0.31543624
5 Not at all 35 5.9% 0.05872483
97 Not answered 31 5.2% 0.05201342
98 Not asked 13144 NA


r25_metpox


Variable label: Based on your spontaneous impression: to what extent do you like or dislike this politician?
Literal question: Based on your spontaneous impression: to what extent do you like or dislike this politician?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_metnsx_ran = 3,4 & r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly like 4 0.3% 0.003325021
2 Significantly like 24 2.0% 0.019950125
3 Somewhat like 90 7.5% 0.074812968
4 Neither like nor dislike 572 47.5% 0.475477972
5 Somewhat dislike 244 20.3% 0.202826268
6 Dislike a lot 157 13.1% 0.130507066
7 Strongly dislike 41 3.4% 0.034081463
97 Not answered 71 5.9% 0.059019119
98 Not asked 12537 NA


r25_metnpx


Variable label: To what extent do you have confidence in [r25_metnsx_pipe]?
Literal question: To what extent do you have confidence in [r25_metnsx_pipe]?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 58 2.4% 0.02411642
2 To a large extent 516 21.5% 0.21455301
3 To some extent 1141 47.4% 0.47442827
4 To a small extent 416 17.3% 0.17297297
5 Not at all 135 5.6% 0.05613306
97 Not answered 139 5.8% 0.05779626
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgtiv_1


Variable label: Resembles you: Respect for parents and for older people is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] believes that [he/she] should always show respect for [him/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [his/hers] to be obedient.
Technical description: [Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
6 6 Very much resembles me 253 10.5% 0.10519751
5 5 Resembles me 536 22.3% 0.22286902
4 4 Somewhat resembles me 809 33.6% 0.33638254
3 3 Slightly resembles me 418 17.4% 0.17380457
2 2 Does not resemble me 216 9.0% 0.08981289
1 1 Does not resemble me at all 84 3.5% 0.03492723
97 Not answered 89 3.7% 0.03700624
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgtiv_2


Variable label: Resembles you: Religious faith is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [him/her] religion requires.
Technical description: [Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
6 6 Very much resembles me 41 1.7% 0.01704782
5 5 Resembles me 77 3.2% 0.03201663
4 4 Somewhat resembles me 185 7.7% 0.07692308
3 3 Slightly resembles me 310 12.9% 0.12889813
2 2 Does not resemble me 460 19.1% 0.19126819
1 1 Does not resemble me at all 1241 51.6% 0.51600832
97 Not answered 91 3.8% 0.03783784
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgtiv_3


Variable label: Resembles you: To help people around you is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
Technical description: [Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
6 6 Very much resembles me 536 22.3% 0.222869023
5 5 Resembles me 848 35.3% 0.352598753
4 4 Somewhat resembles me 789 32.8% 0.328066528
3 3 Slightly resembles me 129 5.4% 0.053638254
2 2 Does not resemble me 16 0.7% 0.006652807
1 1 Does not resemble me at all 4 0.2% 0.001663202
97 Not answered 83 3.5% 0.034511435
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgtiv_4


Variable label: Resembles you: To have all people in the world be treated equally is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
Technical description: [Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
6 6 Very much resembles me 656 27.3% 0.272765073
5 5 Resembles me 836 34.8% 0.347609148
4 4 Somewhat resembles me 632 26.3% 0.262785863
3 3 Slightly resembles me 129 5.4% 0.053638254
2 2 Does not resemble me 52 2.2% 0.021621622
1 1 Does not resemble me at all 13 0.5% 0.005405405
97 Not answered 87 3.6% 0.036174636
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgtiv_5


Variable label: Resembles you: To be interested in things and to be curious is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
Technical description: [Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
6 6 Very much resembles me 506 21.0% 0.210395010
5 5 Resembles me 784 32.6% 0.325987526
4 4 Somewhat resembles me 749 31.1% 0.311434511
3 3 Slightly resembles me 215 8.9% 0.089397089
2 2 Does not resemble me 51 2.1% 0.021205821
1 1 Does not resemble me at all 13 0.5% 0.005405405
97 Not answered 87 3.6% 0.036174636
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgtiv_6


Variable label: Resembles you: To take risks and look for new experiences is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
Technical description: [Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
6 6 Very much resembles me 69 2.9% 0.02869023
5 5 Resembles me 233 9.7% 0.09688150
4 4 Somewhat resembles me 578 24.0% 0.24033264
3 3 Slightly resembles me 782 32.5% 0.32515593
2 2 Does not resemble me 466 19.4% 0.19376299
1 1 Does not resemble me at all 190 7.9% 0.07900208
97 Not answered 87 3.6% 0.03617464
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgtiv_7


Variable label: Resembles you: To seek out opportunites to have fun is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [his/hers] to do things that give [his/hers] pleasure.
Technical description: [Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
6 6 Very much resembles me 147 6.1% 0.06112266
5 5 Resembles me 345 14.3% 0.14345114
4 4 Somewhat resembles me 903 37.5% 0.37546778
3 3 Slightly resembles me 617 25.7% 0.25654886
2 2 Does not resemble me 236 9.8% 0.09812890
1 1 Does not resemble me at all 74 3.1% 0.03076923
97 Not answered 83 3.5% 0.03451143
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgtiv_8


Variable label: Resembles you: To be sucessful and to impress other people is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
Technical description: [Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
6 6 Very much resembles me 85 3.5% 0.03534304
5 5 Resembles me 260 10.8% 0.10810811
4 4 Somewhat resembles me 671 27.9% 0.27900208
3 3 Slightly resembles me 685 28.5% 0.28482328
2 2 Does not resemble me 411 17.1% 0.17089397
1 1 Does not resemble me at all 204 8.5% 0.08482328
97 Not answered 89 3.7% 0.03700624
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgtiv_9


Variable label: Resembles you: To take the lead and tell others what to do is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
Technical description: [Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
6 6 Very much resembles me 29 1.2% 0.01205821
5 5 Resembles me 150 6.2% 0.06237006
4 4 Somewhat resembles me 577 24.0% 0.23991684
3 3 Slightly resembles me 750 31.2% 0.31185031
2 2 Does not resemble me 512 21.3% 0.21288981
1 1 Does not resemble me at all 297 12.3% 0.12349272
97 Not answered 90 3.7% 0.03742204
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgtiv_10


Variable label: Resembles you: To have things tidy and clean is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
Technical description: [Wording dependent on respondents gender]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
6 6 Very much resembles me 385 16.0% 0.16008316
5 5 Resembles me 677 28.1% 0.28149688
4 4 Somewhat resembles me 771 32.1% 0.32058212
3 3 Slightly resembles me 345 14.3% 0.14345114
2 2 Does not resemble me 105 4.4% 0.04365904
1 1 Does not resemble me at all 34 1.4% 0.01413721
97 Not answered 88 3.7% 0.03659044
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgedu


Variable label: Highest completed education
Literal question: What is the highest level of completed education?
Post-question: If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No completed education 10 0.4% 0.004158004
2 Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7- year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) 120 5.0% 0.049896050
3 Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School) 247 10.3% 0.102702703
4 Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) 340 14.1% 0.141372141
5 Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical college) 228 9.5% 0.094802495
6 University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ years) 158 6.6% 0.065696466
7 College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) 459 19.1% 0.190852391
8 University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) 177 7.4% 0.073596674
9 College-5-6 year education (Master, major) 165 6.9% 0.068607069
10 University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education (e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics)) 349 14.5% 0.145114345
11 Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) 56 2.3% 0.023284823
12 None of the above (please enter): 20 0.8% 0.008316008
97 Not answered 76 3.2% 0.031600832
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgedu_12_other


Variable label: Highest completed education: None of the above
Pre-question text: What is the highest level of completed education?
Literal question: None of the above
Post-question: If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bginc


Variable label: Gross annual income
Pre-question text: What is your current income?
Literal question: Gross annual income is:
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 <150 000 166 6.9% 0.06902287
2 150 001 - 300 000 285 11.9% 0.11850312
3 300 001 - 400 000 295 12.3% 0.12266112
4 400 001 - 500 000 323 13.4% 0.13430353
5 500 001 - 600 000 359 14.9% 0.14927235
6 600 001 - 700 000 314 13.1% 0.13056133
7 700 001 - 1 000 000 386 16.0% 0.16049896
8 >1 000000 169 7.0% 0.07027027
97 Not answered 108 4.5% 0.04490644
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgday


Variable label: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Literal question: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Post-question: Select one alternative
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) 1132 47.1% 0.470686071
2 In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more 89 3.7% 0.037006237
3 In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week 94 3.9% 0.039085239
4 Self-employed 93 3.9% 0.038669439
5 In education (not paid by an employer) 133 5.5% 0.055301455
6 Unemployed and actively seeking a job 30 1.2% 0.012474012
7 Unemployed and not actively seeking a job 11 0.5% 0.004573805
8 Permanently ill or disabled 142 5.9% 0.059043659
9 Retired 523 21.7% 0.217463617
10 In military service 6 0.2% 0.002494802
11 Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons 18 0.7% 0.007484407
12 Other: 56 2.3% 0.023284823
97 Not answered 78 3.2% 0.032432432
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgday_12_other


Variable label: Other: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Pre-question text: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Literal question: Other
Post-question: Select one alternative
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgwor


Variable label: Which type of business do you work in?
Literal question: Which type of business do you work in?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_bgday = 1,2,3 & r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 State, county or municipal administration 158 12.0% 0.120152091
2 Public sector (e.g. school and health services) 399 30.3% 0.303422053
3 Publicly owned enterprise 70 5.3% 0.053231939
4 Private business 643 48.9% 0.488973384
5 Self-employed 7 0.5% 0.005323194
6 Other: 35 2.7% 0.026615970
97 Not answered 3 0.2% 0.002281369
98 Not asked 12425 NA


r25_bgwor_6_other


Variable label: Other: Which type of business do you work/worked in?
Pre-question text: Which type of business do you work/worked in?
Literal question: Other:
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_bgday = 1,2,3 & r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgupm_sok


Variable label: NA
Pre-question text:

We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the year.

Old and new municipality names

We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in 2020 are not included in the list.

Why is my municipality listed several times?

Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose “Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
Literal question: Enter the name of the municipality you lived in, and then select from the list of search results. 
Post-question: If the municipality is not on the list, try checking if the name is spelled correctly in the search box
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgupm


Variable label: Municipality of residence at age 15.
Pre-question text:

We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the year.

Old and new municipality names

We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in 2020 are not included in the list.

Why is my municipality listed several times?

Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose “Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
Literal question: Which municipality did you live in when you were 15?
Post-question: If the municipality is not on the list, try checking if the name is spelled correctly in the search box
Technical description:

[Asked if (r25_bgupm_sok is answered & !(r25_bgupm_utland is answered | r25_bgupm_mangler is answered)) & r25_group = 6]

[Answer list based on response in Filter(“r25_bgupm”, f(“r25_bgupm_sok”).get())]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgupm_utland_1


Variable label: Municipality of residence: Did not live in Norway
Pre-question text:

We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the year.

Old and new municipality names

We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in 2020 are not included in the list.

Why is my municipality listed several times?

Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose “Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
Literal question: I didn’t live in Norway the year I turned 15
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_bgupm_mangler ikke is answered & r25_group = 6]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgupm_mangler_2


Variable label: Municipality of residence: Municipality not listed
Pre-question text:

We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the year.

Old and new municipality names

We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in 2020 are not included in the list.

Why is my municipality listed several times?

Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose “Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
Literal question: I can’t find my municipality on the list
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_bgupm_utland ikke is answered & r25_group = 6]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgupm_other


Variable label: Open: Municipality of residence at age 15
Pre-question text:

We will ask you which municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old. If you lived in several municipalities during the year you turned 15, you can specify the one in which you lived for most of the year.

Old and new municipality names

We know that Norwegian municipalities have changed, and on the list below you will therefore find both the names of municipalities that still exist and the names of previous municipalities. Enter the name of the municipality you lived in when you were 15 years old, even if the municipality no longer exists. The new municipalities from the reform in 2020 are not included in the list.

Why is my municipality listed several times?

Some municipalities have one or more years associated with them, for example, you can see both “Bergen (-1971)” and “Bergen” on the list. If you lived in Bergen in 1971 or earlier when you turned 15, choose “Bergen (– 1971)”. If you turned 15 after 1971, just choose “Bergen”.
Literal question: When I was 15, I lived in this municipality: 
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_bgupm_mangler is answered & r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgupc


Variable label: Respondents home county at 15 years of age
Technical description: [Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r25_bgupm]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:1944] [Invalid:11796] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
3 Oslo 162 8.3% 0.08333333
11 Rogaland 185 9.5% 0.09516461
15 Møre og Romsdal 115 5.9% 0.05915638
18 Nordland 119 6.1% 0.06121399
30 Viken 405 20.8% 0.20833333
34 Innlandet 151 7.8% 0.07767490
38 Vestfold og Telemark 153 7.9% 0.07870370
42 Agder 108 5.6% 0.05555556
46 Vestland 290 14.9% 0.14917695
50 Trøndelag 177 9.1% 0.09104938
54 Troms og Finnmark 79 4.1% 0.04063786
Sysmiss 11796 NA


r25_bgciv


Variable label: Marital status
Pre-question text: What is your marital status?
Literal question: Check what fits the best
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Single 361 15.0% 0.150103950
2 Non-domestic relationship 152 6.3% 0.063201663
3 Cohabitant 440 18.3% 0.182952183
4 Married/legally registered partner 1167 48.5% 0.485239085
5 Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner 128 5.3% 0.053222453
6 Widow/widower 67 2.8% 0.027858628
7 Other: 5 0.2% 0.002079002
97 Not answered 85 3.5% 0.035343035
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgciv_7_other


Variable label: Other: Marital status
Pre-question text: Marital status.
Literal question: Other
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgchi


Variable label: Living with children under 16 years
Literal question: Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you, and if so, how many?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 None 1780 74.0% 0.7401247401
1 1 250 10.4% 0.1039501040
2 2 204 8.5% 0.0848232848
3 3 67 2.8% 0.0278586279
4 4 8 0.3% 0.0033264033
5 5 1 0.0% 0.0004158004
6 6 or more 1 0.0% 0.0004158004
97 Not answered 94 3.9% 0.0390852391
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgcla


Variable label: Social class, personal placement.
Pre-question text: We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
Literal question: If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Lower class 33 1.4% 0.013721414
2 Working class 349 14.5% 0.145114345
3 Lower middle class 256 10.6% 0.106444906
4 Middle class 1172 48.7% 0.487318087
5 Upper middle class 378 15.7% 0.157172557
6 Upper class 6 0.2% 0.002494802
7 Do not know 122 5.1% 0.050727651
97 Not answered 89 3.7% 0.037006237
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgrel


Variable label: Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination
Literal question: Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 6]

[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgrelrecode


Variable label: Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [Recoded]
Literal question: Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Church of Norway 1303 54.2% 0.54178794
2 The Catholic Church 33 1.4% 0.01372141
3 Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) 107 4.4% 0.04449064
4 Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) 31 1.3% 0.01288981
5 Islam 29 1.2% 0.01205821
6 Do not belong to any religion or religious denominations 814 33.8% 0.33846154
97 Not answered 88 3.7% 0.03659044
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgrem


Variable label: How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Literal question: Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Every day 3 0.1% 0.001247401
2 More than once a week 21 0.9% 0.008731809
3 Once a week 37 1.5% 0.015384615
4 Once or a few times a month 70 2.9% 0.029106029
5 Several times a year 196 8.1% 0.081496881
6 Once a year 293 12.2% 0.121829522
7 Less than once a year 404 16.8% 0.167983368
8 Never 1287 53.5% 0.535135135
97 Not answered 94 3.9% 0.039085239
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgcit


Variable label: Citizenship
Literal question: Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 2158 89.7% 0.89729730
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: 157 6.5% 0.06528067
97 Not answered 90 3.7% 0.03742204
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgcit_2_other


Variable label: Citizen of another country
Literal question: Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country:
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgimm


Variable label: Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r25_group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 2010 83.6% 0.835758836
2 I myself have immigrated to Norway 200 8.3% 0.083160083
3 Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 21 0.9% 0.008731809
4 My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated 44 1.8% 0.018295218
5 My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated 38 1.6% 0.015800416
97 Not answered 92 3.8% 0.038253638
98 Not asked 11335 NA


r25_bgimh


Variable label: Which country did you live in before you immigrated?
Literal question: Which country did you live in before you immigrated?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_bgimm = 2 & r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgimp_m


Variable label: Open: Which country did your mother live in before your parents immigrated?
Pre-question text: Which country did you parents live in (mother, father or both) before they immigrated?
Literal question: Mother:
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_bgimm = 3 & r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgimp_f


Variable label: Open: Which country did your father live in before your parents immigrated?
Pre-question text: Which country did you parents live in (mother, father or both) before they immigrated?
Literal question: Father:
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_bgimm = 3 & r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgimpm


Variable label: Open: In which country did your mother live before she immigrated?
Literal question: In which country did your mother live before she immigrated?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_bgimm = 4 & r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_bgimpf


Variable label: Open: In which country did your father live before he immigrated?
Literal question: In which country did your father live before he immigrated?
Technical description:

[Asked if r25_bgimm = 5 & r25_group = 6]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_hecor


Variable label: How likely do you think it is that you will be infected by the coronavirus
Literal question: How likely do you think it is that you will be infected by the coronavirus (or re-infected, if you have already had it)?
Technical description: [Asked if r25panel_1 = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly unlikely 223 12.4% 0.123751387
2 Fairly unlikely 403 22.4% 0.223640400
3 Neither likely nor unlikely 779 43.2% 0.432297447
4 Fairly likely 263 14.6% 0.145948946
5 Highly likely 125 6.9% 0.069367370
97 Not answered 9 0.5% 0.004994451
98 Not asked 11938 NA


r25_hecob


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I do my best to limit infection risks
Literal question: I do my best to limit infection risks (washing hands frequently, avoiding travel and situations involving contact with other people, keeping a distance and avoiding touching things)
Technical description: [Asked if r25panel_1 = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 98 5.4% 0.05438402
2 Disagree 364 20.2% 0.20199778
3 Neither agree nor disagree 527 29.2% 0.29245283
4 Agree 602 33.4% 0.33407325
5 Completely agree 189 10.5% 0.10488346
97 Not answered 22 1.2% 0.01220866
98 Not asked 11938 NA


r25_hecvax_ran


Variable label: Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r25_hecvax]
Technical description: [Randomized if r25panel_1 = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1793] [Invalid:11947] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Consider the health authorities offering a vaccine against diseases like COVID-19. Those who have the vaccine will more easily stay healthy and will be able to live more as normal during a pandemic outbreak. It is therefore an advantage if you decide to have the vaccination. 453 25.3% 0.2526492
2 Consider the health authorities offering a vaccine against diseases like COVID-19. Those who have the vaccine will more easily stay healthy and will be able to live more as normal during a pandemic outbreak. It is therefore an advantage that as many people as possible in society choose to have the vaccination. 442 24.7% 0.2465142
3 Consider that a new vaccine is offered against diseases like COVID-19. If many people have the vaccine, it is less likely that a pandemic outbreak would have a negative impact on society. It is therefore an advantage if you decide to have the vaccination. 451 25.2% 0.2515337
4 Consider that a new vaccine is offered against diseases like COVID-19. If many people have the vaccine, it is less likely that a pandemic outbreak would have a negative impact on society. It is therefore an advantage that as many people as possible in society choose to have the vaccination. 447 24.9% 0.2493028
Sysmiss 11947 NA


r25_hecvax


Variable label: Anyone wanting the vaccine must contact their GP and book an appointment for a vaccination.
Literal question: How sure are you that you want to have such a vaccine?
Technical description: [Asked if r25panel_1 = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I would definitely have taken the vaccine 951 52.8% 0.527746948
2 I would probably have taken the vaccine 521 28.9% 0.289123196
3 I'm not sure if I would have taken the vaccine 168 9.3% 0.093229745
4 I would probably not have taken the vaccine 90 5.0% 0.049944506
5 I would definitely not have taken the vaccine 63 3.5% 0.034961154
97 Not answered 9 0.5% 0.004994451
98 Not asked 11938 NA


r25_pcsag


Variable label: How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 254 1.8% 0.018486172
2 Satisfied 2994 21.8% 0.217903930
3 Somewhat satisfied 4449 32.4% 0.323799127
4 Dissatisfied 3923 28.6% 0.285516739
5 Not satisfied at all 2093 15.2% 0.152328967
97 Not answered 27 0.2% 0.001965066


r25_pceco


Variable label: Assessment of: Your own financial situation today
Literal question: How would you assess your own financial situation today?
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 1169 10.3% 0.103131892
2 Good 5368 47.4% 0.473577415
3 Quite good 1899 16.8% 0.167534186
4 Neither good nor bad 1581 13.9% 0.139479488
5 Quite bad 828 7.3% 0.073048081
6 Bad 296 2.6% 0.026113807
7 Very bad 128 1.1% 0.011292457
97 Not answered 66 0.6% 0.005822673
98 Not asked 2405 NA


r25_pcecy


Variable label: Assessment of: Your own financial situation in a year
Literal question: How would you assess your own financial situation in a year?
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much worse than today 184 1.6% 0.016232907
2 Worse than today 2952 26.0% 0.260432289
3 Neither worse nor better than today 6986 61.6% 0.616321129
4 Better than today 1079 9.5% 0.095191884
5 Much better than today 82 0.7% 0.007234230
97 Not answered 52 0.5% 0.004587561
98 Not asked 2405 NA


r25_pcpar


Variable label: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Answer list display order: Randomized]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 361 2.6% 0.026273654
2 The Conservative Party 3751 27.3% 0.272998544
3 The Progressive Party 1033 7.5% 0.075181951
4 The Liberal Party 636 4.6% 0.046288210
5 The Socialist Left Party 1495 10.9% 0.108806405
6 The Centre Party 509 3.7% 0.037045124
7 The Green Party 654 4.8% 0.047598253
8 The Labour Party 2509 18.3% 0.182605531
9 The Red Party 1016 7.4% 0.073944687
10 Would not vote 311 2.3% 0.022634643
11 Would cast a blank vote 525 3.8% 0.038209607
12 Not entitled to vote 273 2.0% 0.019868996
13 Other: 603 4.4% 0.043886463
97 Not answered 64 0.5% 0.004657933


r25_pcpar_13_other


Variable label: Other: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
Pre-question text: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Literal question: Other:
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Answer list display order: Randomized]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_pceum


Variable label: How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
Literal question: How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 1323 9.6% 0.096288210
2 Positive 2521 18.3% 0.183478894
3 Somewhat positive 2042 14.9% 0.148617176
4 Neither positive nor negative 1755 12.8% 0.127729258
5 Somewhat negative 2097 15.3% 0.152620087
6 Negative 2193 16.0% 0.159606987
7 Very negative 1744 12.7% 0.126928675
97 Not answered 65 0.5% 0.004730713


r25_innae


Variable label: How do you rate the increased military presence of NATO in Eastern Europe?
Pre-question text: NATO has recently increased its military forces and military equipment in Eastern Europe considerably.
Literal question: How do you rate the increased military presence in Eastern Europe?
Technical description: [All respondents asked]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positively 4535 33.0% 0.330058224
2 Somewhat positively 4768 34.7% 0.347016012
3 Neither positively, nor negatively 1752 12.8% 0.127510917
4 Somewhat negatively 1229 8.9% 0.089446870
5 Very negatively 894 6.5% 0.065065502
6 Do not know 451 3.3% 0.032823872
97 Not answered 111 0.8% 0.008078603


r25_pcecs


Variable label: Perception of current economic situation
Literal question: How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway? Do you believe it is
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 1369 12.1% 0.120776356
2 Good 4118 36.3% 0.363299515
3 Quite good 2162 19.1% 0.190736656
4 Neither good nor bad 1097 9.7% 0.096779885
5 Quite bad 1856 16.4% 0.163740626
6 Bad 572 5.0% 0.050463167
7 Very bad 136 1.2% 0.011998236
97 Not answered 25 0.2% 0.002205558
98 Not asked 2405 NA


r25_pcecz


Variable label: Assessment of: The financial situation in Norway in a year
Literal question: What do you think about the financial situation in Norway in a year?
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much worse than today 287 2.5% 0.025319806
2 Worse than today 4897 43.2% 0.432024702
3 Neither worse nor better than today 4932 43.5% 0.435112483
4 Better than today 1126 9.9% 0.099338333
5 Much better than today 32 0.3% 0.002823114
97 Not answered 61 0.5% 0.005381562
98 Not asked 2405 NA


r25_bgurb


Variable label: Which description best fits the area you live in?
Literal question: Which description best fits the area you live in?
Post-question: We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] = 1 | 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A city 1205 26.1% 0.26144500
2 A suburb or the outskirts of a city 826 17.9% 0.17921458
3 A small or medium sized town 1330 28.9% 0.28856585
4 A village 755 16.4% 0.16380994
5 A sparsely inhabited area 404 8.8% 0.08765459
97 Not answered 89 1.9% 0.01931005
98 Not asked 9131 NA


r25_bghea


Variable label: In general, how would you say your health is?
Literal question: In general, how would you say your health is?
Technical description: [Posed if [r25_group] = 3 | 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Excellent 511 10.9% 0.10916471
2 Very good 1502 32.1% 0.32087161
3 Good 1686 36.0% 0.36017945
4 Somewhat good 684 14.6% 0.14612262
5 Poor 202 4.3% 0.04315317
97 Not answered 96 2.1% 0.02050844
98 Not asked 9059 NA


r25_avslutt


Variable label: Final comments
Literal question: Do you have any feedback with regard to the survey? In that case you can write it here
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:13740] [Range:-]



r25_P1


Variable label: Gender
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Male 6886 50.1% 0.5011645
2 Female 6854 49.9% 0.4988355


r25_P2


Variable label: Region
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Oslo 2079 15.1% 0.15131004
2 Østlandet 5045 36.7% 0.36717613
3 Sørlandet 684 5.0% 0.04978166
4 Vestlandet 3796 27.6% 0.27627365
5 Trøndelag 1111 8.1% 0.08085881
6 Nord-Norge 1025 7.5% 0.07459971


r25_P3


Variable label: County
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:3-54]

Value Label Cases Percentage
3 Oslo 2079 15.1% 0.15131004
11 Rogaland 1275 9.3% 0.09279476
15 Møre og Romsdal 581 4.2% 0.04228530
18 Nordland 514 3.7% 0.03740902
30 Viken 3191 23.2% 0.23224163
34 Innlandet 790 5.7% 0.05749636
38 Vestfold og Telemark 1064 7.7% 0.07743814
42 Agder 684 5.0% 0.04978166
46 Vestland 1940 14.1% 0.14119360
50 Trøndelag 1111 8.1% 0.08085881
54 Troms og Finnmark 511 3.7% 0.03719068


r25_P3_2


Variable label: Constituencies parliament election 2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]

Value Label Cases Percentage
3 Østfold 671 4.9% 0.048835517
1 Akershus 1907 13.9% 0.138791849
2 Oslo 2079 15.1% 0.151310044
5 Hedmark 421 3.1% 0.030640466
6 Oppland 369 2.7% 0.026855895
7 Buskerud 613 4.5% 0.044614265
4 Vestfold 679 4.9% 0.049417758
8 Telemark 385 2.8% 0.028020378
10 Aust-Agder 251 1.8% 0.018267831
9 Vest-Agder 433 3.2% 0.031513828
11 Rogaland 1275 9.3% 0.092794760
12 Hordaland 1697 12.4% 0.123508006
13 Sogn og Fjordane 243 1.8% 0.017685590
14 Møre og Romsdal 581 4.2% 0.042285298
16 Sør-Trøndelag 871 6.3% 0.063391557
15 Nord-Trøndelag 240 1.7% 0.017467249
17 Nordland 514 3.7% 0.037409025
18 Troms 380 2.8% 0.027656477
19 Finnmark 131 1.0% 0.009534207


r25_P4_1


Variable label: Highest completed education
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No education/elementary school 662 4.8% 0.04818049
2 Upper secondary education 4189 30.5% 0.30487627
3 University/University college 8577 62.4% 0.62423581
97 Not answered 312 2.3% 0.02270742


r25_P4_2


Variable label: Highest completed education
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No completed education 38 0.3% 0.002765648
2 Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) 624 4.5% 0.045414847
3 Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School) 1242 9.0% 0.090393013
4 Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) 1689 12.3% 0.122925764
5 Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical college) 1252 9.1% 0.091120815
6 University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ years) 1097 8.0% 0.079839884
7 College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) 2893 21.1% 0.210553130
8 University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) 978 7.1% 0.071179039
9 College-5-6 year education (Master, major) 992 7.2% 0.072197962
10 University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education (MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economic 2270 16.5% 0.165211063
11 Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) 347 2.5% 0.025254731
12 None of the above (please enter): 164 1.2% 0.011935953
97 Not answered 154 1.1% 0.011208151


r25_P5_1


Variable label: Year of birth
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1939 or earlier 290 2.1% 0.02110626
2 1940-1949 2038 14.8% 0.14832606
3 1950-1959 3348 24.4% 0.24366812
4 1960-1969 3076 22.4% 0.22387191
5 1970-1979 2219 16.1% 0.16149927
6 1980-1989 1476 10.7% 0.10742358
7 1990 or later 1293 9.4% 0.09410480


r25_P5_2


Variable label: Year of birth
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1959 or earlier 5676 41.3% 0.4131004
2 1960-1989 6771 49.3% 0.4927948
3 1990 or later 1293 9.4% 0.0941048


r25_Weight1stratapop


Variable label: Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata constructed with P1, P2, and age
Technical description: [Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation report.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-0]



r25_Weight1


Variable label: Weight based on variables P1, P2, and age. See documentation report.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-7]



r25_Weight2stratapop


Variable label: Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata constructed with P1, P2, P4_1, and age
Technical description: [Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation report.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13428] [Invalid:312] [Range:0-0]



r25_Weight2


Variable label: Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1, and age. See documentation report.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-58]



r25_Weight4


Variable label: Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1) upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2 and x <= 5).
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:13740] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]