Citation
Researchers responsible
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
|
Sina Storelv
|
UiB
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Lise Lund Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
NORCE
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
|
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø
|
NORCE
|
|
Arjan Schakel
|
UiB
|
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
UiB
|
Scientific committee for KODEM
|
Name
|
Affiliaton
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
|
Tobias Bach
|
UiO
|
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
|
Henning Finseraas
|
NTNU
|
|
Jonas Stein
|
UiT
|
Coordinating team
|
Name
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
|
Sina Storelv
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Ola Grendal
|
ideas2evidence
|
Prosjektmedarbeider
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
uib.no/en/citizen
Some of the questions in wave 26 are part of a system of coordinated
surveys (“KODEM Light”), which also collects information about beliefs
and convictions of elected representatives
(uib.no/representant), and
government employees (uib.no/NFP).
This mode of data collection enables innovate research of groups that
comprise parts of the political body in Norway.
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Universe: Norwegian Citizens 18 years
or older.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in the
following waves:
|
Round
|
Sample size
|
Recruited
|
|
1
|
25 000
|
4 870
|
|
3
|
25 000
|
5 623
|
|
8
|
22 000
|
4 245
|
|
11
|
14 000
|
2 069
|
|
14
|
14 000
|
2 036
|
|
16
|
34 000
|
5 163
|
|
18
|
14 000
|
2 048
|
|
22
|
23 000
|
3 221
|
|
25
|
18 000
|
2 405
|
All samples are drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d)
gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from
previous waves:
https://nsd.no/nsddata/serier/norsk_medborgerpanel_eng.html
In wave 26, emails were sent out on 16th of February, 2023.
An email with reminder was sent out three times; February 22nd or 28th
(dependent on when winter break took place), 6th of March, and March
9th, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the
survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with
registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message.
Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by email.
Wave 26 ended on the 14th of March 2023.
Weighting
To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated.
The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population
and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata
in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns
values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will
receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a
weight below 1. The weights of the different strata are listed in the
documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information
regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are
based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample
file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information
regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when
answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weights are calculated
using the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized)
sub-groups, which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group
compared to the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, variable
columns are included in the dataset that indicates the proportion size
of strata in the population.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-104
|
2023-09-04
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 26
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-31
|
r26_Weight1
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-31
|
r26_Weight2
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-31
|
r26_Weight1stratapop
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-31
|
r26_Weight2stratapop
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-31
|
r26P5_1
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-31
|
r26P5_2
|
Corrected
missing values
|
|
v-104
|
2023-08-31
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 26
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-30
|
r20bk26
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-30
|
r22bk26_kodet
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-30
|
r25_bgedu
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-08-30
|
r25_pcvot21
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-103
|
2023-07-04
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 26
|
|
NA
|
2023-06-27
|
r26_pcsaf
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2023-06-27
|
r26_pcoil
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-102
|
2023-05-31
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 26
|
|
NA
|
2023-05-30
|
r26_Weight3
|
New
variable: Added r26_Weight3
|
|
NA
|
2023-05-30
|
r26_Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r26_Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-05-30
|
r26_Weight5
|
New
variable: Added r26_Weight5
|
|
NA
|
2023-05-30
|
r26_Weight3
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2023-05-30
|
r26_Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2023-05-30
|
r26_Weight5
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2023-05-26
|
r26P2
|
Replace
missing values with value
|
|
NA
|
2023-05-15
|
r26_pcoil
|
Corrected
documentation
|
|
NA
|
2023-05-15
|
r26_pcecr
|
Corrected
documentation
|
|
NA
|
2023-05-15
|
r26_pcsaf
|
Corrected
documentation
|
|
NA
|
2023-05-15
|
r26_pcres
|
Corrected
documentation
|
|
v-101
|
2023-05-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 26
|
|
v-100
|
2023-04-04
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 26
|
|
NA
|
2023-03-28
|
r25_bgupc
|
New
variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years
of age, based on registered municipality in r25_bgupm
|
|
NA
|
2023-03-28
|
r25_bgupc
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22bk26_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r22bk26 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22bk27_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r22bk27 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r23bk33_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r23bk33 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r23bk21_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r23bk21 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r23bk27_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r23bk27 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22bk26_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2022-05-04
|
r22bk27_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2022-02-14
|
r22oppvekstfylke
|
New
variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years
of age, based on registered municipality in r22oppvekstkom
|
|
NA
|
2022-02-14
|
r22oppvekstfylke
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r20tdr8_a_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r20tdr8_a that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r20tdr8_b_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r20tdr8_b that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_1_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r16k43_1 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_2_kodet
|
New
variable: New version of r16k43_2 that also includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_1_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_2_kodet
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-02-11
|
r17oppvekstfylke
|
New
variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years
of age, based on registered municipality in r17oppvekstkom
|
|
NA
|
2021-02-11
|
r18oppvekstfylke
|
New
variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years
of age, based on registered municipality in r18oppvekstkom
|
|
NA
|
2021-02-11
|
r17oppvekstfylke
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2021-02-11
|
r18oppvekstfylke
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2019-03-27
|
r11bk40_recode
|
Added variable based on r11k40.
|
|
NA
|
2019-03-27
|
r14bk40_recode
|
Added variable based on r14k40.
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 26 - v-104-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
12021
|
|
# Variables
|
441
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r26_rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-25]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
1416 |
11.8% |
0.11779386 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
1512 |
12.6% |
0.12577989 |
| 8 |
Wave 8 |
1390 |
11.6% |
0.11563098 |
| 11 |
Wave 11 |
754 |
6.3% |
0.06272357 |
| 14 |
Wave 14 |
790 |
6.6% |
0.06571833 |
| 16 |
Wave 16 |
2136 |
17.8% |
0.17768904 |
| 18 |
Wave 18 |
847 |
7.0% |
0.07046003 |
| 22 |
Wave 22 |
1600 |
13.3% |
0.13310041 |
| 25 |
Wave 25 |
1576 |
13.1% |
0.13110390 |
r26_interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r26_interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11450] [Invalid:571]
[Range:-]
|
r26_browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r26_browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r26_mobil
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
6244 |
51.9% |
0.5194243 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
5777 |
48.1% |
0.4805757 |
r26_opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r26_enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
6244 |
51.9% |
0.519424341 |
| 2 |
Touch |
5716 |
47.6% |
0.475501206 |
| 3 |
Generic |
61 |
0.5% |
0.005074453 |
r26_advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r26_getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r26_group
|
Variable label:
|
Subgroup
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Respondents recruited in wave 25 was set to group 2. Conditional
randomisation for the remaining respondents: 60% was set to group 1, 20%
was set to group 3, and 20% was set to group 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 |
6239 |
51.9% |
0.5190084 |
| 2 |
Group 2 (respondents recruited in wave 25) |
1576 |
13.1% |
0.1311039 |
| 3 |
Group 3 (kodemgroup 1) |
2115 |
17.6% |
0.1759421 |
| 4 |
Group 4 (kodemgroup 2) |
2091 |
17.4% |
0.1739456 |
r26_pcpin
|
Variable label:
|
How interested are you in politics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
923 |
14.8% |
0.1479403751 |
| 2 |
Interested |
3103 |
49.7% |
0.4973553454 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
1762 |
28.2% |
0.2824170540 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
395 |
6.3% |
0.0633114281 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
53 |
0.8% |
0.0084949511 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.0% |
0.0004808463 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5782 |
|
NA |
r26_pcmipo_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (1)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
1:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12021] [Range:-]
|
r26_pcmipo_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (2)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
2:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12021] [Range:-]
|
r26_pcmipo_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (3)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
3:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12021] [Range:-]
|
r26_pcldpk
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1153 |
14.8% |
0.147536788 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1444 |
18.5% |
0.184772873 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1870 |
23.9% |
0.239283429 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1944 |
24.9% |
0.248752399 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
994 |
12.7% |
0.127191299 |
| 6 |
Really like |
268 |
3.4% |
0.034293026 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
62 |
0.8% |
0.007933461 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
80 |
1.0% |
0.010236724 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcldph
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
400 |
5.1% |
0.05118362 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
955 |
12.2% |
0.12220090 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1350 |
17.3% |
0.17274472 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1088 |
13.9% |
0.13921945 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1937 |
24.8% |
0.24785669 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1530 |
19.6% |
0.19577735 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
476 |
6.1% |
0.06090851 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
79 |
1.0% |
0.01010877 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcldpf
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2221 |
28.4% |
0.284197057 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1595 |
20.4% |
0.204094690 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1174 |
15.0% |
0.150223928 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
879 |
11.2% |
0.112476008 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1128 |
14.4% |
0.144337812 |
| 6 |
Really like |
567 |
7.3% |
0.072552783 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
181 |
2.3% |
0.023160589 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
70 |
0.9% |
0.008957134 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcldpv
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
584 |
7.5% |
0.07472809 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
965 |
12.3% |
0.12348049 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1697 |
21.7% |
0.21714651 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2179 |
27.9% |
0.27882278 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1693 |
21.7% |
0.21663468 |
| 6 |
Really like |
506 |
6.5% |
0.06474728 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
95 |
1.2% |
0.01215611 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
96 |
1.2% |
0.01228407 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcldpsv
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Socialist Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
842 |
10.8% |
0.10774152 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1217 |
15.6% |
0.15572617 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1407 |
18.0% |
0.18003839 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1329 |
17.0% |
0.17005758 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1577 |
20.2% |
0.20179143 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1085 |
13.9% |
0.13883557 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
268 |
3.4% |
0.03429303 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
1.2% |
0.01151631 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcldpsp
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1033 |
13.2% |
0.132181702 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1565 |
20.0% |
0.200255918 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1969 |
25.2% |
0.251951376 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1621 |
20.7% |
0.207421625 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1174 |
15.0% |
0.150223928 |
| 6 |
Really like |
316 |
4.0% |
0.040435061 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
58 |
0.7% |
0.007421625 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
79 |
1.0% |
0.010108765 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcldpm
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1560 |
20.0% |
0.19961612 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1205 |
15.4% |
0.15419066 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1373 |
17.6% |
0.17568778 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1233 |
15.8% |
0.15777351 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1562 |
20.0% |
0.19987204 |
| 6 |
Really like |
649 |
8.3% |
0.08304543 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
152 |
1.9% |
0.01944978 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
1.0% |
0.01036468 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcldpa
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
682 |
8.7% |
0.087268074 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
933 |
11.9% |
0.119385797 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1553 |
19.9% |
0.198720409 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1148 |
14.7% |
0.146896993 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2219 |
28.4% |
0.283941139 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1027 |
13.1% |
0.131413948 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
188 |
2.4% |
0.024056302 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
65 |
0.8% |
0.008317338 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcldpr
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1663 |
21.3% |
0.21279591 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1296 |
16.6% |
0.16583493 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1275 |
16.3% |
0.16314779 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1192 |
15.3% |
0.15252719 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1451 |
18.6% |
0.18566859 |
| 6 |
Really like |
650 |
8.3% |
0.08317338 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
209 |
2.7% |
0.02674344 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
79 |
1.0% |
0.01010877 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pccoo
|
Variable label:
|
Most people in general can be trusted
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
26 |
0.3% |
0.003326935 |
| 1 |
1 |
57 |
0.7% |
0.007293666 |
| 2 |
2 |
106 |
1.4% |
0.013563660 |
| 3 |
3 |
263 |
3.4% |
0.033653231 |
| 4 |
4 |
286 |
3.7% |
0.036596289 |
| 5 |
5 |
578 |
7.4% |
0.073960333 |
| 6 |
6 |
796 |
10.2% |
0.101855406 |
| 7 |
7 |
1836 |
23.5% |
0.234932821 |
| 8 |
8 |
2621 |
33.5% |
0.335380678 |
| 9 |
9 |
889 |
11.4% |
0.113755598 |
| 10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
335 |
4.3% |
0.042866283 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
0.3% |
0.002815099 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcsal
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with life
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
2133 |
27.3% |
0.272936660 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
4483 |
57.4% |
0.573640435 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
940 |
12.0% |
0.120281510 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
204 |
2.6% |
0.026103647 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
41 |
0.5% |
0.005246321 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.2% |
0.001791427 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcsaf
|
Variable label:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has your local environment become
|
|
Literal question:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the
past couple of years.
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much safer |
80 |
1.3% |
0.012822568 |
| 2 |
Somewhat safer |
420 |
6.7% |
0.067318481 |
| 3 |
No change in safity |
4685 |
75.1% |
0.750921622 |
| 4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
958 |
15.4% |
0.153550248 |
| 5 |
Much more unsafe |
79 |
1.3% |
0.012662286 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.3% |
0.002724796 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5782 |
|
NA |
r26_pcecz
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of: The financial situation in Norway in a year
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the financial situation in Norway in a year?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 5 |
Much worse than today |
42 |
0.5% |
0.005374280 |
| 4 |
Worse than today |
1388 |
17.8% |
0.177607166 |
| 3 |
Neither worse nor better than today |
3434 |
43.9% |
0.439411388 |
| 2 |
Better than today |
2708 |
34.7% |
0.346513116 |
| 1 |
Much better than today |
204 |
2.6% |
0.026103647 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.5% |
0.004990403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pccop
|
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
151 |
1.9% |
0.019321817 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
2192 |
28.0% |
0.280486244 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
3323 |
42.5% |
0.425207933 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
1618 |
20.7% |
0.207037748 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
458 |
5.9% |
0.058605246 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
73 |
0.9% |
0.009341011 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pccos
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
352 |
4.5% |
0.045041587 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
2945 |
37.7% |
0.376839411 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
3007 |
38.5% |
0.384772873 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
1113 |
14.2% |
0.142418426 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
341 |
4.4% |
0.043634037 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
0.7% |
0.007293666 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pccom
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
320 |
4.1% |
0.04094690 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
3026 |
38.7% |
0.38720409 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
3259 |
41.7% |
0.41701855 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
918 |
11.7% |
0.11746641 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
250 |
3.2% |
0.03198976 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.5% |
0.00537428 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcsag
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
114 |
1.5% |
0.014587332 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1228 |
15.7% |
0.157133717 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2511 |
32.1% |
0.321305182 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
2551 |
32.6% |
0.326423544 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
1345 |
17.2% |
0.172104926 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
66 |
0.8% |
0.008445298 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcecr
|
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in [r26_P2] compared to the rest of the country
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation [r26_P2] with the rest of Norway,
do you consider the situation [r26_P2] as being better, the same or
worse?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Better |
1695 |
21.7% |
0.21689060 |
| 2 |
The same |
4715 |
60.3% |
0.60332694 |
| 3 |
Worse |
1331 |
17.0% |
0.17031350 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
0.9% |
0.00946897 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcter
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
157 |
2.0% |
0.020089571 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
785 |
10.0% |
0.100447857 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
3434 |
43.9% |
0.439411388 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
2972 |
38.0% |
0.380294306 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
444 |
5.7% |
0.056813820 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.3% |
0.002943058 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcepe
|
Variable label:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like
you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like
you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
20 |
1.3% |
0.012690355 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
177 |
11.2% |
0.112309645 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
635 |
40.3% |
0.402918782 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
563 |
35.7% |
0.357233503 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
168 |
10.7% |
0.106598985 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.8% |
0.008248731 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10445 |
|
NA |
r26_pcipe
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me
do not understand what it’s about.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not
understand what it’s about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
81 |
5.1% |
0.051395939 |
| 2 |
Agree |
231 |
14.7% |
0.146573604 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
468 |
29.7% |
0.296954315 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
178 |
11.3% |
0.112944162 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
207 |
13.1% |
0.131345178 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
301 |
19.1% |
0.190989848 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
103 |
6.5% |
0.065355330 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004441624 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10445 |
|
NA |
r26_pcrur_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r26_pcrur].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7793] [Invalid:4228]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
rural Norway |
3936 |
50.5% |
0.5050687 |
| 2 |
non-urban/rural Norway |
3857 |
49.5% |
0.4949313 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4228 |
|
NA |
r26_pcrur
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for
[r26_pcrur_ran].
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
assertion:
Government authorities show little consideration for [r26_pcrur_ran].
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1181 |
15.1% |
0.151119642 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1792 |
22.9% |
0.229302623 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2019 |
25.8% |
0.258349328 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1214 |
15.5% |
0.155342290 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
655 |
8.4% |
0.083813180 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
687 |
8.8% |
0.087907869 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
228 |
2.9% |
0.029174664 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.5% |
0.004990403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcres
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich
parts of the country to ensure that everyone receives public services of
the same quality.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement:
Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the
country to parts that are not so rich in order to ensure that everyone
receives public services of the same quality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
914 |
11.7% |
0.116954575 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2535 |
32.4% |
0.324376200 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2519 |
32.2% |
0.322328855 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
895 |
11.5% |
0.114523353 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
536 |
6.9% |
0.068586052 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
275 |
3.5% |
0.035188740 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
85 |
1.1% |
0.010876520 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
0.7% |
0.007165707 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcmun
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The number of municipalities should be reduced further
by more mergers
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway now has 356 municipalities instead of 422 as before. To what
extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
953 |
12.2% |
0.121944978 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1047 |
13.4% |
0.133973129 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1030 |
13.2% |
0.131797825 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1748 |
22.4% |
0.223672425 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
796 |
10.2% |
0.101855406 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1387 |
17.7% |
0.177479207 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
810 |
10.4% |
0.103646833 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
0.6% |
0.005630198 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcmsc_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects what version of [r26_pcmsc] is exposed to
the respondent.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7784] [Invalid:4237]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[r26_pcmsc] with a open follow-up question on the same pge |
2643 |
34.0% |
0.3395427 |
| 2 |
[r26_pcmsc] without a follow-up question |
2581 |
33.2% |
0.3315776 |
| 3 |
[r26_pcmsc] with a follow-up question on the next page |
2560 |
32.9% |
0.3288798 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4237 |
|
NA |
r26_pcmsc
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It should be possible for parents to send their children
to Muslim schools.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian
schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the
Christian faith.
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents
to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national
curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
[Shown on the same page with [r26_pcmsc_txt] if [r26_pcmsc_ran] == 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
229 |
2.9% |
0.029302623 |
| 2 |
Agree |
869 |
11.1% |
0.111196417 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
998 |
12.8% |
0.127703135 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1505 |
19.3% |
0.192578375 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1010 |
12.9% |
0.129238644 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1444 |
18.5% |
0.184772873 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1704 |
21.8% |
0.218042226 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
0.7% |
0.007165707 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcmsc_txt
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Comments to [r26_pcmsc]. Showed on the same page as [r26_pcmsc].
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have comments to the question you can write them here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_pcmsc_ran = 1) & (r26_group = 1,2)]
[Shown on the same page with [r26_pcmsc] if [r26_pcmsc_ran] == 1]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021]
[Range:-]
|
r26_pcmsco
|
Variable label:
|
Comments to [r26_pcmsc]. Shown on the page after [r26_pcmsc].
|
|
Literal question:
|
We will now move on to the next topic. If you have any comments about
the previous question, please write them here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_pcmsc_ran = 3) & (r26_group = 1,2)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021]
[Range:-]
|
r26_pcinc
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The Government should work to reduce income inequality
in society
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
suggestion:
The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society to
greater extent.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2015 |
25.8% |
0.25783749 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2321 |
29.7% |
0.29699296 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1700 |
21.8% |
0.21753039 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
702 |
9.0% |
0.08982726 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
565 |
7.2% |
0.07229687 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
331 |
4.2% |
0.04235445 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
128 |
1.6% |
0.01637876 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
53 |
0.7% |
0.00678183 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcpri
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The authorities should introduce more measures to
protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may
be at the expense of privacy.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
proposition:
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from
potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of
privacy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
651 |
8.3% |
0.083301344 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1781 |
22.8% |
0.227895074 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2290 |
29.3% |
0.293026232 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1063 |
13.6% |
0.136020473 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
932 |
11.9% |
0.119257837 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
683 |
8.7% |
0.087396033 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
343 |
4.4% |
0.043889955 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
0.9% |
0.009213052 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pccar
|
Variable label:
|
Proposal that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run
on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private
vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from
2025.
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
|
Post-question:
|
See National Transport Plan 2018-2029, page 16, available here [external
link]: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-33-20162017/id2546287
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run
on hydrogen. |
2302 |
29.5% |
0.29456174 |
| 2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol. |
5414 |
69.3% |
0.69277031 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
99 |
1.3% |
0.01266795 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcsex
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted
sexual attention?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following assertion:
It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
105 |
1.3% |
0.013435701 |
| 2 |
Agree |
201 |
2.6% |
0.025719770 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
790 |
10.1% |
0.101087652 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
606 |
7.8% |
0.077543186 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
746 |
9.5% |
0.095457454 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2164 |
27.7% |
0.276903391 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3148 |
40.3% |
0.402815099 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
0.7% |
0.007037748 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_innae
|
Variable label:
|
How do you rate the increased military presence of NATO in Eastern
Europe?
|
|
Literal question:
|
NATO has recently increased its military forces and military equipment
in Eastern Europe considerably. How do you rate the increased military
presence in Eastern Europe?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
2413 |
30.9% |
0.308765195 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
2554 |
32.7% |
0.326807422 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
954 |
12.2% |
0.122072937 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
809 |
10.4% |
0.103518874 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
482 |
6.2% |
0.061676264 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
538 |
6.9% |
0.068841971 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
65 |
0.8% |
0.008317338 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcimm
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
457 |
5.8% |
0.058477287 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
1771 |
22.7% |
0.226615483 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
3049 |
39.0% |
0.390147153 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1099 |
14.1% |
0.140626999 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
920 |
11.8% |
0.117722329 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
292 |
3.7% |
0.037364044 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
165 |
2.1% |
0.021113244 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
62 |
0.8% |
0.007933461 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcldi
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: immigrants in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 7 |
Intensely like |
481 |
6.2% |
0.06154830 |
| 6 |
Really like |
2097 |
26.8% |
0.26833013 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2034 |
26.0% |
0.26026871 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2246 |
28.7% |
0.28739603 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
653 |
8.4% |
0.08355726 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
131 |
1.7% |
0.01676264 |
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
85 |
1.1% |
0.01087652 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
88 |
1.1% |
0.01126040 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcref
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and
their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is
today, do you mean it should be:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much easier |
284 |
3.6% |
0.03634037 |
| 2 |
Easier |
990 |
12.7% |
0.12667946 |
| 3 |
Somewhat easier |
1659 |
21.2% |
0.21228407 |
| 4 |
Same as today |
3160 |
40.4% |
0.40435061 |
| 5 |
Slightly more difficult |
829 |
10.6% |
0.10607806 |
| 6 |
More difficult |
464 |
5.9% |
0.05937300 |
| 7 |
Much more difficult |
347 |
4.4% |
0.04440179 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
82 |
1.0% |
0.01049264 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcint
|
Variable label:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian
society for integrating refugees?
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian
society for integrating refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
484 |
6.2% |
0.06193218 |
| 2 |
Good |
2274 |
29.1% |
0.29097889 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
1719 |
22.0% |
0.21996161 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
954 |
12.2% |
0.12207294 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poor |
1394 |
17.8% |
0.17837492 |
| 6 |
Poor |
686 |
8.8% |
0.08777991 |
| 7 |
Very poor |
221 |
2.8% |
0.02827895 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
1.1% |
0.01062060 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pceco
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of: Your own financial situation today
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you assess your own financial situation today?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
1005 |
12.9% |
0.128598848 |
| 2 |
Good |
3734 |
47.8% |
0.477799104 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
1299 |
16.6% |
0.166218810 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
962 |
12.3% |
0.123096609 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
504 |
6.4% |
0.064491363 |
| 6 |
Bad |
180 |
2.3% |
0.023032630 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
68 |
0.9% |
0.008701216 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
0.8% |
0.008061420 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcecy
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of: Your own financial situation in a year
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you assess your own financial situation in a year?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 5 |
Much worse than today |
105 |
1.3% |
0.013435701 |
| 4 |
Worse than today |
1160 |
14.8% |
0.148432502 |
| 3 |
Neither worse nor better than today |
5172 |
66.2% |
0.661804223 |
| 2 |
Better than today |
1249 |
16.0% |
0.159820857 |
| 1 |
Much better than today |
50 |
0.6% |
0.006397953 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
79 |
1.0% |
0.010108765 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_cepow_1
|
Variable label:
|
Have you done anything in your home to reduce electricity consumption
and/or reduce the cost of electricity consumption?: Yes, I have taken
measures to use less electricity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Electricity prices have been unusually high in parts of the country
over the past year.
Have you done anything in your home to reduce electricity consumption
and/or reduce the cost of electricity consumption?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, I have taken measures to use less electricity
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1117 |
70.9% |
0.708756345 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
446 |
28.3% |
0.282994924 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.8% |
0.008248731 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10445 |
|
NA |
r26_cepow_2
|
Variable label:
|
Have you done anything in your home to reduce electricity consumption
and/or reduce the cost of electricity consumption?: Yes, I have taken
measures to move the use of electricity to other times of the day
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Electricity prices have been unusually high in parts of the country
over the past year.
Have you done anything in your home to reduce electricity consumption
and/or reduce the cost of electricity consumption?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, I have taken measures to move the use of electricity to other times
of the day
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
580 |
36.8% |
0.368020305 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
983 |
62.4% |
0.623730964 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.8% |
0.008248731 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10445 |
|
NA |
r26_cepow_3
|
Variable label:
|
Have you done anything in your home to reduce electricity consumption
and/or reduce the cost of electricity consumption?: No
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Electricity prices have been unusually high in parts of the country
over the past year.
Have you done anything in your home to reduce electricity consumption
and/or reduce the cost of electricity consumption?
|
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
244 |
15.5% |
0.154822335 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1319 |
83.7% |
0.836928934 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.8% |
0.008248731 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10445 |
|
NA |
r26_cepow_txt
|
Variable label:
|
Comments to [r26_cepow]
|
|
Literal question:
|
You can here write more about prices for and consumption of electricity:
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021]
[Range:-]
|
r26_bghea
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
573 |
9.2% |
0.091841641 |
| 2 |
Very good |
1898 |
30.4% |
0.304215419 |
| 3 |
Good |
2416 |
38.7% |
0.387241545 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
1023 |
16.4% |
0.163968585 |
| 5 |
Poor |
269 |
4.3% |
0.043115884 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
1.0% |
0.009616926 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5782 |
|
NA |
r26_bghel
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
275 |
17.4% |
0.17449239 |
| 2 |
Good |
827 |
52.5% |
0.52474619 |
| 3 |
Moderately good |
329 |
20.9% |
0.20875635 |
| 4 |
Not very good |
104 |
6.6% |
0.06598985 |
| 5 |
Poor |
22 |
1.4% |
0.01395939 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.2% |
0.01205584 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10445 |
|
NA |
r26_bgtraf
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would you say that you have feminine characteristics
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you say that you had feminine characteristics? I
have…
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ingvild Leren Stensrud (EUI)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - few feminine characteristics |
110 |
7.0% |
0.06979695 |
| 1 |
1 |
121 |
7.7% |
0.07677665 |
| 2 |
2 |
228 |
14.5% |
0.14467005 |
| 3 |
3 |
120 |
7.6% |
0.07614213 |
| 4 |
4 |
97 |
6.2% |
0.06154822 |
| 5 |
5 |
142 |
9.0% |
0.09010152 |
| 6 |
6 |
92 |
5.8% |
0.05837563 |
| 7 |
7 |
165 |
10.5% |
0.10469543 |
| 8 |
8 |
234 |
14.8% |
0.14847716 |
| 9 |
9 |
124 |
7.9% |
0.07868020 |
| 10 |
10 - many feminine characteristics |
99 |
6.3% |
0.06281726 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.8% |
0.02791878 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10445 |
|
NA |
r26_bgtram
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would you say that you have male characteristics
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you say that you had male characteristics? I have…
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ingvild Leren Stensrud (EUI)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - few masculine characteristics |
78 |
4.9% |
0.04949239 |
| 1 |
1 |
109 |
6.9% |
0.06916244 |
| 2 |
2 |
170 |
10.8% |
0.10786802 |
| 3 |
3 |
162 |
10.3% |
0.10279188 |
| 4 |
4 |
96 |
6.1% |
0.06091371 |
| 5 |
5 |
157 |
10.0% |
0.09961929 |
| 6 |
6 |
123 |
7.8% |
0.07804569 |
| 7 |
7 |
191 |
12.1% |
0.12119289 |
| 8 |
8 |
264 |
16.8% |
0.16751269 |
| 9 |
9 |
115 |
7.3% |
0.07296954 |
| 10 |
10 - many masculine characteristics |
63 |
4.0% |
0.03997462 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
3.0% |
0.03045685 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10445 |
|
NA |
r26_bggid
|
Variable label:
|
How important is it to you that others see you as [masculine/feminine]?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In our database, you are registered as [male/female].
How important is it to you that others see you as [masculine/feminine]?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ingvild Leren Stensrud (EUI)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
143 |
9.1% |
0.090736041 |
| 2 |
Important |
447 |
28.4% |
0.283629442 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
383 |
24.3% |
0.243020305 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
338 |
21.4% |
0.214467005 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
215 |
13.6% |
0.136421320 |
| 6 |
My registered gender is not correct |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001269036 |
| 7 |
I do not want to answer this question |
23 |
1.5% |
0.014593909 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.6% |
0.015862944 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10445 |
|
NA |
r26_bgciv
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your marital status? Check what fits the best
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
746 |
12.0% |
0.119570444 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
302 |
4.8% |
0.048405193 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
952 |
15.3% |
0.152588556 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
3552 |
56.9% |
0.569322007 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
347 |
5.6% |
0.055617887 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
262 |
4.2% |
0.041993909 |
| 7 |
Other: |
20 |
0.3% |
0.003205642 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
0.9% |
0.009296362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5782 |
|
NA |
r26_bgciv_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Marital status
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your marital status? Check what fits the best
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1) & (r26_group = 1,2)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12021] [Range:-]
|
r26_bgday
|
Variable label:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one alternative
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
3339 |
42.7% |
0.4272552783 |
| 2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
242 |
3.1% |
0.0309660909 |
| 3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
250 |
3.2% |
0.0319897633 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
301 |
3.9% |
0.0385156750 |
| 5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
182 |
2.3% |
0.0232885477 |
| 6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
55 |
0.7% |
0.0070377479 |
| 7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
28 |
0.4% |
0.0035828535 |
| 8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
456 |
5.8% |
0.0583493282 |
| 9 |
Retired |
2635 |
33.7% |
0.3371721049 |
| 10 |
In military service |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0006397953 |
| 11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
33 |
0.4% |
0.0042226488 |
| 12 |
Other: |
217 |
2.8% |
0.0277671145 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
0.9% |
0.0092130518 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_bgday_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have
been doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one alternative
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12021] [Range:-]
|
r26_bgsct
|
Variable label:
|
What type of business/enterprise do you work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What type of business/enterprise do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1 & r26_bgday = 1,2,3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
410 |
13.7% |
0.136666667 |
| 2 |
Other public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
896 |
29.9% |
0.298666667 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
201 |
6.7% |
0.067000000 |
| 4 |
Private business |
1378 |
45.9% |
0.459333333 |
| 5 |
Self-employed |
22 |
0.7% |
0.007333333 |
| 6 |
Other: |
87 |
2.9% |
0.029000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9021 |
|
NA |
r26_bgsct_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: What type of business/enterprise do you work in?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What type of business/enterprise do you work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1 & r26_bgday = 1,2,3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12021] [Range:-]
|
r26_bgoil
|
Variable label:
|
[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely
associated with it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely
associated with it?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_bgday = 1,2,3,9) & (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I [work/worked] in the oil or gas industry |
285 |
4.4% |
0.044076709 |
| 2 |
Yes, my job [is/was] closely associated with the oil or gas industry |
250 |
3.9% |
0.038663780 |
| 3 |
No, but previously I have worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely
associated with it |
177 |
2.7% |
0.027373956 |
| 4 |
No |
5726 |
88.6% |
0.885555212 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.4% |
0.004330343 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5555 |
|
NA |
r26_bgoily
|
Variable label:
|
When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry?
|
|
Literal question:
|
When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry (or your
first job closely associated with the oil and gas industry)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_bgoil = 1,2) & (r26_group = 1,2)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_dmcrix_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects and element for textpiping in
[r26k2_dmcrix].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Lise Bjånesøy (UiB), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Åsa von Schoultz (UiH)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_dmcrix_ran; p9k2_dmcrix_ran
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4206] [Invalid:7815]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
central administration (ministries, directorates, etc.) doing a good enough job |
840 |
20.0% |
0.1997147 |
| 2 |
the Government doing a good enough job |
782 |
18.6% |
0.1859249 |
| 3 |
national politicians doing a good enough job |
846 |
20.1% |
0.2011412 |
| 4 |
local politicians doing a good enough job |
849 |
20.2% |
0.2018545 |
| 5 |
Norwegian democracy working well enough |
889 |
21.1% |
0.2113647 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7815 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dmcrix
|
Variable label:
|
Level of trust that [r26k2_dmcrix_ran] when faced with the crises that
have affected society over the past year
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much trust or distrust do you personally have in [r26k2_dmcrix_ran]
when faced with the crises that have affected society over the past
year?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Lise Bjånesøy (UiB), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Åsa von Schoultz (UiH)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_dmcrix; p9k2_dmcrix
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A great deal of trust |
189 |
4.5% |
0.0449358060 |
| 2 |
A lot of trust |
1513 |
36.0% |
0.3597242035 |
| 3 |
Some trust |
1325 |
31.5% |
0.3150261531 |
| 4 |
Neither trust nor distrust |
262 |
6.2% |
0.0622919639 |
| 5 |
Some distrust |
475 |
11.3% |
0.1129339039 |
| 6 |
A lot of distrust |
313 |
7.4% |
0.0744174988 |
| 7 |
A great deal of distrust |
125 |
3.0% |
0.0297194484 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.1% |
0.0009510223 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7815 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dminfx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_dminfx].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Lise Bjånesøy (UiB), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Åsa von Schoultz (UiH)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_dminfx_ran1; p9k2_dminfx_ran1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4206] [Invalid:7815]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
central administration (ministries, directorates, etc.) |
1412 |
33.6% |
0.3357109 |
| 2 |
national politicians |
1380 |
32.8% |
0.3281027 |
| 3 |
voters |
1414 |
33.6% |
0.3361864 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7815 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dminfx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_dminfx].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Lise Bjånesøy (UiB), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Åsa von Schoultz (UiH)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_dminfx_ran2; p9k2_dminfx_ran2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4206] [Invalid:7815]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
immigration issues |
2132 |
50.7% |
0.5068949 |
| 2 |
health issues |
2074 |
49.3% |
0.4931051 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7815 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dminfx
|
Variable label:
|
Should [r26k2_dminfx_ran1] have more or less influence over decisions on
[r26k2_dminfx_ran2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, should [r26k2_dminfx_ran1] have more or less influence
than they currently have over decisions on [r26k2_dminfx_ran2]?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Lise Bjånesøy (UiB), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Åsa von Schoultz (UiH)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_dminfx; p9k2_dminfx
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more |
206 |
4.9% |
0.04897765 |
| 2 |
More |
816 |
19.4% |
0.19400856 |
| 3 |
A little more |
656 |
15.6% |
0.15596767 |
| 4 |
Neither more nor less |
1872 |
44.5% |
0.44507846 |
| 5 |
A little less |
353 |
8.4% |
0.08392772 |
| 6 |
Less |
185 |
4.4% |
0.04398478 |
| 7 |
Much less |
73 |
1.7% |
0.01735616 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
1.1% |
0.01069900 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7815 |
|
NA |
r26k2_ineci_1
|
Variable label:
|
How do you respond to the following statements about Norway’s position
in European collaboration?: The energy crisis shows that it is important
for Norway to collaborate on energy with the European Union (EU).
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you respond to the following statements about Norway’s position
in European collaboration?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The energy crisis shows that it is important for Norway to collaborate
on energy with the European Union (EU).
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Elizabeth Stie (UiA), Jarle Trondal (UiA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_ineci_1; p9k2_ineci_1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
245 |
11.6% |
0.11583924 |
| 2 |
Agree |
501 |
23.7% |
0.23687943 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
385 |
18.2% |
0.18203310 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
177 |
8.4% |
0.08368794 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
245 |
11.6% |
0.11583924 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
263 |
12.4% |
0.12434988 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
228 |
10.8% |
0.10780142 |
| 8 |
Do not know |
68 |
3.2% |
0.03215130 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.00141844 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_ineci_2
|
Variable label:
|
How do you respond to the following statements about Norway’s position
in European collaboration?: The Covid-19 crisis shows that it is
important for Norway to collaborate on vaccines with the EU.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you respond to the following statements about Norway’s position
in European collaboration?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Covid-19 crisis shows that it is important for Norway to collaborate
on vaccines with the EU.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Elizabeth Stie (UiA), Jarle Trondal (UiA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_ineci_2; p9k2_ineci_2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
809 |
38.3% |
0.382505910 |
| 2 |
Agree |
801 |
37.9% |
0.378723404 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
227 |
10.7% |
0.107328605 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
111 |
5.2% |
0.052482270 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
40 |
1.9% |
0.018912530 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
42 |
2.0% |
0.019858156 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
68 |
3.2% |
0.032151300 |
| 8 |
Do not know |
14 |
0.7% |
0.006619385 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001418440 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_ineci_3
|
Variable label:
|
How do you respond to the following statements about Norway’s position
in European collaboration?: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine shows that it
is important for Norway to have foreign and defence collaboration with
the EU.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you respond to the following statements about Norway’s position
in European collaboration?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine shows that it is important for Norway to
have foreign and defence collaboration with the EU.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Elizabeth Stie (UiA), Jarle Trondal (UiA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_ineci_3; p9k2_ineci_3
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
946 |
44.7% |
0.447281324 |
| 2 |
Agree |
717 |
33.9% |
0.339007092 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
192 |
9.1% |
0.090780142 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
95 |
4.5% |
0.044917258 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
50 |
2.4% |
0.023640662 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
47 |
2.2% |
0.022222222 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
2.2% |
0.021749409 |
| 8 |
Do not know |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008510638 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001891253 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_intwax_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_intwax].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_intwax_ran; p9k2_intwax_ran
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2115] [Invalid:9906]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
to you personally |
691 |
32.7% |
0.3267139 |
| 2 |
to Norway |
736 |
34.8% |
0.3479905 |
| 3 |
to the world |
688 |
32.5% |
0.3252955 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_intwax
|
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat do you think war in Europe is [r26k2_intwax_ran]?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat do you think war in Europe is [r26k2_intwax_ran]?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_intwax; p9k2_intwax
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
495 |
23.4% |
0.234042553 |
| 2 |
Serious |
826 |
39.1% |
0.390543735 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
566 |
26.8% |
0.267612293 |
| 4 |
Not very serious |
189 |
8.9% |
0.089361702 |
| 5 |
Not a threat |
32 |
1.5% |
0.015130024 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003309693 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dmaik
|
Variable label:
|
How much would you say you know about machine learning and artificial
intelligence?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask about your attitudes regarding the use of
machine learning in public administration (e.g. the Norwegian Labour and
Welfare Administration (NAV), the Norwegian Tax Administration, various
ministries, etc).
|
|
Literal question:
|
Machine learning is often referred to as artificial intelligence.
Using machine learning involves getting computers to learn how to solve
tasks based on data. Computers can often become extremely accurate,
although this typically requires a lot of data. Today, machine learning
provides the basis for everything from automatic voice recognition to
driverless cars.
Generally speaking, how much would you say you know about machine
learning and artificial intelligence?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Sveinung Arnesen (UiB/NORCE), Mikael Johannesson (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_dmaik; p9k2_dmaik
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A great deal |
49 |
2.3% |
0.0231678487 |
| 2 |
A lot |
280 |
13.2% |
0.1323877069 |
| 3 |
A bit |
860 |
40.7% |
0.4066193853 |
| 4 |
Not much |
793 |
37.5% |
0.3749408983 |
| 5 |
Nothing at all |
131 |
6.2% |
0.0619385343 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009456265 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dmaip
|
Variable label:
|
Improvement/deterioration of public services: Norwegian authorities’ use
of machine learning and artificial intelligence to automate certain
tasks and to provide information for decisions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In some cases, public administration uses machine learning. Machine
learning can be used to fully automate certain tasks and to provide
decision makers with information or suggestions. Based on what you know,
do you think the Norwegian authorities’ use of machine learning and
artificial intelligence will lead to an improvement or a deterioration
of public services?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Sveinung Arnesen (UiB/NORCE), Mikael Johannesson (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_dmaip; p9k2_dmaip
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Great improvement |
30 |
1.4% |
0.0141843972 |
| 2 |
Improvement |
353 |
16.7% |
0.1669030733 |
| 3 |
Some improvement |
593 |
28.0% |
0.2803782506 |
| 4 |
Neither improvement nor deterioration |
353 |
16.7% |
0.1669030733 |
| 5 |
Some deterioration |
293 |
13.9% |
0.1385342790 |
| 6 |
Deterioration |
235 |
11.1% |
0.1111111111 |
| 7 |
Great deterioration |
42 |
2.0% |
0.0198581560 |
| 8 |
Do not know |
214 |
10.1% |
0.1011820331 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009456265 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dmrse
|
Variable label:
|
How important it is that the authorities make accurate decisions
regarding the resettlement of refugees
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Directorate of Integration and Diversity is responsible for the
resettlement of refugees who come to Norway. It is a goal that
resettlement takes place quickly and that refugees are integrated into
Norwegian working life and society.
It has been shown that the first place where refugees are settled
affects how well integrated they become in the long term, such as
whether they get a job or not. An accurate decision when it comes to the
resettlement of refugees is one where the likelihood of a refugee being
integrated has been maximised.
How important do you think it is that the authorities make accurate
decisions regarding the resettlement of refugees?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Sveinung Arnesen (UiB/NORCE), Mikael Johannesson (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_dmrse; p9k2_dmrse
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Extremely important |
497 |
23.5% |
0.234988180 |
| 2 |
Very important |
1331 |
62.9% |
0.629314421 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
204 |
9.6% |
0.096453901 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006146572 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006146572 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
54 |
2.6% |
0.025531915 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001418440 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dmair
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Norwegian authorities using machine learning and
artificial intelligence when resettling refugees
|
|
Literal question:
|
In some countries, attempts have been made to use machine learning and
artificial intelligence to support the decision on where to place
refugees. Based on your knowledge, how strongly do you support or oppose
the Norwegian authorities using machine learning and artificial
intelligence when resettling refugees?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Sveinung Arnesen (UiB/NORCE), Mikael Johannesson (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_dmair; p9k2_dmair
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support very strongly |
22 |
1.0% |
0.0104018913 |
| 2 |
Support strongly |
144 |
6.8% |
0.0680851064 |
| 3 |
Support somewhat |
530 |
25.1% |
0.2505910165 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
505 |
23.9% |
0.2387706856 |
| 5 |
Oppose somewhat |
334 |
15.8% |
0.1579196217 |
| 6 |
Oppose strongly |
228 |
10.8% |
0.1078014184 |
| 7 |
Oppose very strongly |
69 |
3.3% |
0.0326241135 |
| 8 |
Do not know |
281 |
13.3% |
0.1328605201 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009456265 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cetccx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_cetccx].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cetccx_ran; p9k2_cetccx_ran
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2115] [Invalid:9906]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
to you personally |
632 |
29.9% |
0.2988180 |
| 2 |
to Norway |
724 |
34.2% |
0.3423168 |
| 3 |
to the world |
759 |
35.9% |
0.3588652 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cetccx
|
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat do you think climate change is [r26k2_cetccx_ran]?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat do you think climate change is [r26k2_cetccx_ran]?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cetccx; p9k2_cetccx
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
330 |
15.6% |
0.156028369 |
| 2 |
Serious |
661 |
31.3% |
0.312529551 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
662 |
31.3% |
0.313002364 |
| 4 |
Not very serious |
356 |
16.8% |
0.168321513 |
| 5 |
Not a threat |
90 |
4.3% |
0.042553191 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.8% |
0.007565012 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_a
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following considerations should be when
deciding on measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?: The measure
results in major reductions in emissions for every krone it costs
(cost-effective)
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are a number of relevant measures to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. When Norwegian politicians have to choose between different
measures, several considerations must be taken into account.
How important do you think the following considerations should be
when deciding which measures to introduce?:
The measure results in major reductions in emissions for every krone it
costs (cost-effective)
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_a; p9k2_cemes_a
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group == 3)][Shown on the same page and in random order
with [r26k2_cemes_b] - [r26k2_cemes_j]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:9957]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Irrelevant |
45 |
2.2% |
0.02180233 |
| 1 |
1 |
32 |
1.6% |
0.01550388 |
| 2 |
2 |
50 |
2.4% |
0.02422481 |
| 3 |
3 |
68 |
3.3% |
0.03294574 |
| 4 |
4 |
107 |
5.2% |
0.05184109 |
| 5 |
5 |
279 |
13.5% |
0.13517442 |
| 6 |
6 |
263 |
12.7% |
0.12742248 |
| 7 |
7 |
303 |
14.7% |
0.14680233 |
| 8 |
8 |
343 |
16.6% |
0.16618217 |
| 9 |
9 |
278 |
13.5% |
0.13468992 |
| 10 |
10 - Very important |
296 |
14.3% |
0.14341085 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9957 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_aprevval
|
Variable label:
|
Previous values registered by the respondent in [r26k2_cemes_a].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_aprevval; p9k2_cemes_aprevval
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1786] [Invalid:10235]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_cemes_ainteractions
|
Variable label:
|
Number of interactions with slider in [r26k2_cemes_a].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_ainteractions; p9k2_cemes_ainteractions
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1786] [Invalid:10235]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1600 |
89.6% |
0.8958566629 |
| 2 |
|
146 |
8.2% |
0.0817469205 |
| 3 |
|
29 |
1.6% |
0.0162374020 |
| 4 |
|
7 |
0.4% |
0.0039193729 |
| 5 |
|
2 |
0.1% |
0.0011198208 |
| 6 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005599104 |
| 7 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005599104 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10235 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_b
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following considerations should be when
deciding on measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?: The measure
has broad support among citizens
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are a number of relevant measures to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. When Norwegian politicians have to choose between different
measures, several considerations must be taken into account.
How important do you think the following considerations should be
when deciding which measures to introduce?:
The measure has broad support among citizens
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_b; p9k2_cemes_b
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group == 3)][Shown on the same page and in random order
with [r26k2_cemes_a] - [r26k2_cemes_j]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2066] [Invalid:9955]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Irrelevant |
44 |
2.1% |
0.02129719 |
| 1 |
1 |
40 |
1.9% |
0.01936108 |
| 2 |
2 |
80 |
3.9% |
0.03872217 |
| 3 |
3 |
130 |
6.3% |
0.06292352 |
| 4 |
4 |
170 |
8.2% |
0.08228461 |
| 5 |
5 |
315 |
15.2% |
0.15246854 |
| 6 |
6 |
233 |
11.3% |
0.11277832 |
| 7 |
7 |
325 |
15.7% |
0.15730881 |
| 8 |
8 |
324 |
15.7% |
0.15682478 |
| 9 |
9 |
161 |
7.8% |
0.07792836 |
| 10 |
10 - Very important |
244 |
11.8% |
0.11810261 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9955 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_bprevval
|
Variable label:
|
Previous values registered by the respondent in [r26k2_cemes_b].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_bprevval; p9k2_cemes_bprevval
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1789] [Invalid:10232]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_cemes_binteractions
|
Variable label:
|
Number of interactions with slider in [r26k2_cemes_b].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_binteractions; p9k2_cemes_binteractions
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1789] [Invalid:10232]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1567 |
87.6% |
0.875908329 |
| 2 |
|
164 |
9.2% |
0.091671325 |
| 3 |
|
38 |
2.1% |
0.021240917 |
| 4 |
|
17 |
1.0% |
0.009502515 |
| 5 |
|
3 |
0.2% |
0.001676914 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10232 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_c
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following considerations should be when
deciding on measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?: The measure
does not harm the Norwegian economy
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are a number of relevant measures to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. When Norwegian politicians have to choose between different
measures, several considerations must be taken into account.
How important do you think the following considerations should be
when deciding which measures to introduce?:
The measure does not harm the Norwegian economy
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_c; p9k2_cemes_c
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group == 3)][Shown on the same page and in random order
with [r26k2_cemes_a] - [r26k2_cemes_j]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2067] [Invalid:9954]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Irrelevant |
45 |
2.2% |
0.02177068 |
| 1 |
1 |
53 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
| 2 |
2 |
101 |
4.9% |
0.04886309 |
| 3 |
3 |
151 |
7.3% |
0.07305273 |
| 4 |
4 |
177 |
8.6% |
0.08563135 |
| 5 |
5 |
357 |
17.3% |
0.17271408 |
| 6 |
6 |
233 |
11.3% |
0.11272375 |
| 7 |
7 |
272 |
13.2% |
0.13159168 |
| 8 |
8 |
288 |
13.9% |
0.13933237 |
| 9 |
9 |
158 |
7.6% |
0.07643928 |
| 10 |
10 - Very important |
232 |
11.2% |
0.11223996 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9954 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_cprevval
|
Variable label:
|
Previous values registered by the respondent in [r26k2_cemes_c].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_cprevval; p9k2_cemes_cprevval
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1787] [Invalid:10234]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_cemes_cinteractions
|
Variable label:
|
Number of interactions with slider in [r26k2_cemes_c]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_cinteractions; p9k2_cemes_cinteractions
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1787] [Invalid:10234]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1568 |
87.7% |
0.8774482373 |
| 2 |
|
158 |
8.8% |
0.0884163402 |
| 3 |
|
43 |
2.4% |
0.0240626749 |
| 4 |
|
8 |
0.4% |
0.0044767767 |
| 5 |
|
4 |
0.2% |
0.0022383884 |
| 6 |
|
2 |
0.1% |
0.0011191942 |
| 7 |
|
2 |
0.1% |
0.0011191942 |
| 8 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005595971 |
| 10 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005595971 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10234 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_d
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following considerations should be when
deciding on measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?: The measure
secures jobs in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are a number of relevant measures to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. When Norwegian politicians have to choose between different
measures, several considerations must be taken into account.
How important do you think the following considerations should be
when deciding which measures to introduce?:
The measure secures jobs in Norway
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_d; p9k2_cemes_d
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group == 3)][Shown on the same page and in random order
with [r26k2_cemes_a] - [r26k2_cemes_j]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2067] [Invalid:9954]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Irrelevant |
57 |
2.8% |
0.02757620 |
| 1 |
1 |
42 |
2.0% |
0.02031930 |
| 2 |
2 |
75 |
3.6% |
0.03628447 |
| 3 |
3 |
99 |
4.8% |
0.04789550 |
| 4 |
4 |
112 |
5.4% |
0.05418481 |
| 5 |
5 |
320 |
15.5% |
0.15481374 |
| 6 |
6 |
236 |
11.4% |
0.11417513 |
| 7 |
7 |
294 |
14.2% |
0.14223512 |
| 8 |
8 |
347 |
16.8% |
0.16787615 |
| 9 |
9 |
197 |
9.5% |
0.09530721 |
| 10 |
10 - Very important |
288 |
13.9% |
0.13933237 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9954 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_dprevval
|
Variable label:
|
Previous values registered by the respondent in [r26k2_cemes_d].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_dprevval; p9k2_cemes_dprevval
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1785] [Invalid:10236]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_cemes_dinteractions
|
Variable label:
|
Number of interactions with slider in [r26k2_cemes_d]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_dinteractions; p9k2_cemes_dinteractions
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1785] [Invalid:10236]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1595 |
89.4% |
0.8935574230 |
| 2 |
|
138 |
7.7% |
0.0773109244 |
| 3 |
|
41 |
2.3% |
0.0229691877 |
| 4 |
|
7 |
0.4% |
0.0039215686 |
| 5 |
|
3 |
0.2% |
0.0016806723 |
| 6 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005602241 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10236 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_e
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following considerations should be when
deciding on measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?: The measure
will result in emission cuts in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are a number of relevant measures to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. When Norwegian politicians have to choose between different
measures, several considerations must be taken into account.
How important do you think the following considerations should be
when deciding which measures to introduce?:
The measure will result in emission cuts in Norway
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_e; p9k2_cemes_e
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group == 3)][Shown on the same page and in random order
with [r26k2_cemes_a] - [r26k2_cemes_j]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2065] [Invalid:9956]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Irrelevant |
79 |
3.8% |
0.03825666 |
| 1 |
1 |
47 |
2.3% |
0.02276029 |
| 2 |
2 |
85 |
4.1% |
0.04116223 |
| 3 |
3 |
79 |
3.8% |
0.03825666 |
| 4 |
4 |
92 |
4.5% |
0.04455206 |
| 5 |
5 |
294 |
14.2% |
0.14237288 |
| 6 |
6 |
229 |
11.1% |
0.11089588 |
| 7 |
7 |
301 |
14.6% |
0.14576271 |
| 8 |
8 |
358 |
17.3% |
0.17336562 |
| 9 |
9 |
220 |
10.7% |
0.10653753 |
| 10 |
10 - Very important |
281 |
13.6% |
0.13607748 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9956 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_eprevval
|
Variable label:
|
Previous values registered by the respondent in [r26k2_cemes_e].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_eprevval; p9k2_cemes_eprevval
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1790] [Invalid:10231]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_cemes_einteractions
|
Variable label:
|
Number of interactions with slider in [r26k2_cemes_e]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_einteractions; p9k2_cemes_einteractions
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1790] [Invalid:10231]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1579 |
88.2% |
0.8821229050 |
| 2 |
|
166 |
9.3% |
0.0927374302 |
| 3 |
|
27 |
1.5% |
0.0150837989 |
| 4 |
|
7 |
0.4% |
0.0039106145 |
| 5 |
|
7 |
0.4% |
0.0039106145 |
| 6 |
|
2 |
0.1% |
0.0011173184 |
| 7 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005586592 |
| 9 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005586592 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10231 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_f
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following considerations should be when
deciding on measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?: The measure
shows that Norway takes global responsibility
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are a number of relevant measures to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. When Norwegian politicians have to choose between different
measures, several considerations must be taken into account.
How important do you think the following considerations should be
when deciding which measures to introduce?:
The measure shows that Norway takes global responsibility
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_f; p9k2_cemes_f
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group == 3)][Shown on the same page and in random order
with [r26k2_cemes_a] - [r26k2_cemes_j]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2063] [Invalid:9958]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Irrelevant |
127 |
6.2% |
0.06156083 |
| 1 |
1 |
78 |
3.8% |
0.03780902 |
| 2 |
2 |
111 |
5.4% |
0.05380514 |
| 3 |
3 |
109 |
5.3% |
0.05283568 |
| 4 |
4 |
127 |
6.2% |
0.06156083 |
| 5 |
5 |
291 |
14.1% |
0.14105671 |
| 6 |
6 |
228 |
11.1% |
0.11051866 |
| 7 |
7 |
273 |
13.2% |
0.13233156 |
| 8 |
8 |
313 |
15.2% |
0.15172079 |
| 9 |
9 |
198 |
9.6% |
0.09597673 |
| 10 |
10 - Very important |
208 |
10.1% |
0.10082404 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9958 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_fprevval
|
Variable label:
|
Previous values registered by the respondent in [r26k2_cemes_f].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_fprevval; p9k2_cemes_fprevval
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1788] [Invalid:10233]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_cemes_finteractions
|
Variable label:
|
Number of interactions with slider in [r26k2_cemes_f]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_finteractions; p9k2_cemes_finteractions
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1788] [Invalid:10233]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1577 |
88.2% |
0.8819910515 |
| 2 |
|
154 |
8.6% |
0.0861297539 |
| 3 |
|
41 |
2.3% |
0.0229306488 |
| 4 |
|
10 |
0.6% |
0.0055928412 |
| 5 |
|
3 |
0.2% |
0.0016778523 |
| 6 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005592841 |
| 7 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005592841 |
| 15 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005592841 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10233 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_g
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following considerations should be when
deciding on measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?: The measure
develops technology that can cut emissions on a large scale
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are a number of relevant measures to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. When Norwegian politicians have to choose between different
measures, several considerations must be taken into account.
How important do you think the following considerations should be
when deciding which measures to introduce?:
The measure develops technology that can cut emissions on a large scale
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_g; p9k2_cemes_g
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group == 3)][Shown on the same page and in random order
with [r26k2_cemes_a] - [r26k2_cemes_j]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2069] [Invalid:9952]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Irrelevant |
32 |
1.5% |
0.01546641 |
| 1 |
1 |
21 |
1.0% |
0.01014983 |
| 2 |
2 |
34 |
1.6% |
0.01643306 |
| 3 |
3 |
25 |
1.2% |
0.01208313 |
| 4 |
4 |
53 |
2.6% |
0.02561624 |
| 5 |
5 |
165 |
8.0% |
0.07974867 |
| 6 |
6 |
171 |
8.3% |
0.08264862 |
| 7 |
7 |
295 |
14.3% |
0.14258096 |
| 8 |
8 |
472 |
22.8% |
0.22812953 |
| 9 |
9 |
346 |
16.7% |
0.16723055 |
| 10 |
10 - Very important |
455 |
22.0% |
0.21991300 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9952 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_gprevval
|
Variable label:
|
Previous values registered by the respondent in [r26k2_cemes_g].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_gprevval; p9k2_cemes_gprevval
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1784] [Invalid:10237]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_cemes_ginteractions
|
Variable label:
|
Number of interactions with slider in [r26k2_cemes_g]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_ginteractions; p9k2_cemes_ginteractions
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1784] [Invalid:10237]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1629 |
91.3% |
0.9131165919 |
| 2 |
|
118 |
6.6% |
0.0661434978 |
| 3 |
|
27 |
1.5% |
0.0151345291 |
| 4 |
|
7 |
0.4% |
0.0039237668 |
| 5 |
|
2 |
0.1% |
0.0011210762 |
| 6 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005605381 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10237 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_h
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following considerations should be when
deciding on measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?: The measure is
recommended by experts
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are a number of relevant measures to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. When Norwegian politicians have to choose between different
measures, several considerations must be taken into account.
How important do you think the following considerations should be
when deciding which measures to introduce?:
The measure is recommended by experts
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_h; p9k2_cemes_h
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group == 3)][Shown on the same page and in random order
with [r26k2_cemes_a] - [r26k2_cemes_j]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2062] [Invalid:9959]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Irrelevant |
55 |
2.7% |
0.02667313 |
| 1 |
1 |
37 |
1.8% |
0.01794374 |
| 2 |
2 |
62 |
3.0% |
0.03006790 |
| 3 |
3 |
68 |
3.3% |
0.03297769 |
| 4 |
4 |
88 |
4.3% |
0.04267701 |
| 5 |
5 |
294 |
14.3% |
0.14258002 |
| 6 |
6 |
203 |
9.8% |
0.09844811 |
| 7 |
7 |
285 |
13.8% |
0.13821532 |
| 8 |
8 |
398 |
19.3% |
0.19301649 |
| 9 |
9 |
273 |
13.2% |
0.13239573 |
| 10 |
10 - Very important |
299 |
14.5% |
0.14500485 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9959 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_hprevval
|
Variable label:
|
Previous values registered by the respondent in [r26k2_cemes_h].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_hprevval; p9k2_cemes_hprevval
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1781] [Invalid:10240]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_cemes_hinteractions
|
Variable label:
|
Number of interactions with slider in [r26k2_cemes_h]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_hinteractions; p9k2_cemes_hinteractions
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1781] [Invalid:10240]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1571 |
88.2% |
0.8820887142 |
| 2 |
|
156 |
8.8% |
0.0875912409 |
| 3 |
|
40 |
2.2% |
0.0224592925 |
| 4 |
|
8 |
0.4% |
0.0044918585 |
| 5 |
|
3 |
0.2% |
0.0016844469 |
| 6 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005614823 |
| 7 |
|
2 |
0.1% |
0.0011229646 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10240 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_i
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following considerations should be when
deciding on measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?: The measure
will not increase economic disparities between people in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are a number of relevant measures to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. When Norwegian politicians have to choose between different
measures, several considerations must be taken into account.
How important do you think the following considerations should be
when deciding which measures to introduce?:
The measure will not increase economic disparities between people in
Norway
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_i; p9k2_cemes_i
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group == 3)][Shown on the same page and in random order
with [r26k2_cemes_a] - [r26k2_cemes_j]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2062] [Invalid:9959]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Irrelevant |
47 |
2.3% |
0.02279340 |
| 1 |
1 |
22 |
1.1% |
0.01066925 |
| 2 |
2 |
65 |
3.2% |
0.03152279 |
| 3 |
3 |
69 |
3.3% |
0.03346266 |
| 4 |
4 |
84 |
4.1% |
0.04073715 |
| 5 |
5 |
273 |
13.2% |
0.13239573 |
| 6 |
6 |
163 |
7.9% |
0.07904947 |
| 7 |
7 |
239 |
11.6% |
0.11590689 |
| 8 |
8 |
361 |
17.5% |
0.17507274 |
| 9 |
9 |
270 |
13.1% |
0.13094083 |
| 10 |
10 - Very important |
469 |
22.7% |
0.22744908 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9959 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_iprevval
|
Variable label:
|
Previous values registered by the respondent in [r26k2_cemes_i].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_iprevval; p9k2_cemes_iprevval
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1773] [Invalid:10248]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_cemes_iinteractions
|
Variable label:
|
Number of interactions with slider in [r26k2_cemes_i]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_iinteractions; p9k2_cemes_iinteractions
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1773] [Invalid:10248]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1578 |
89.0% |
0.8900169205 |
| 2 |
|
151 |
8.5% |
0.0851663847 |
| 3 |
|
32 |
1.8% |
0.0180485054 |
| 4 |
|
9 |
0.5% |
0.0050761421 |
| 5 |
|
2 |
0.1% |
0.0011280316 |
| 7 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005640158 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10248 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_j
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think the following considerations should be when
deciding on measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?: The measure
does not harm Norwegian nature
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are a number of relevant measures to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. When Norwegian politicians have to choose between different
measures, several considerations must be taken into account.
How important do you think the following considerations should be
when deciding which measures to introduce?:
The measure does not harm Norwegian nature
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_j; p9k2_cemes_j
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group == 3)][Shown on the same page and in random order
with [r26k2_cemes_a] - [r26k2_cemes_i]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2068] [Invalid:9953]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Irrelevant |
22 |
1.1% |
0.010638298 |
| 1 |
1 |
14 |
0.7% |
0.006769826 |
| 2 |
2 |
41 |
2.0% |
0.019825919 |
| 3 |
3 |
53 |
2.6% |
0.025628627 |
| 4 |
4 |
75 |
3.6% |
0.036266925 |
| 5 |
5 |
206 |
10.0% |
0.099613153 |
| 6 |
6 |
178 |
8.6% |
0.086073501 |
| 7 |
7 |
285 |
13.8% |
0.137814313 |
| 8 |
8 |
389 |
18.8% |
0.188104449 |
| 9 |
9 |
320 |
15.5% |
0.154738878 |
| 10 |
10 - Very important |
485 |
23.5% |
0.234526112 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9953 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemes_jprevval
|
Variable label:
|
Previous values registered by the respondent in [r26k2_cemes_j].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_jprevval; p9k2_cemes_jprevval
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:1785] [Invalid:10236]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_cemes_jinteractions
|
Variable label:
|
Number of interactions with slider in [r26k2_cemes_j]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemes_jinteractions; p9k2_cemes_jinteractions
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1785] [Invalid:10236]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
1549 |
86.8% |
0.8677871148 |
| 2 |
|
170 |
9.5% |
0.0952380952 |
| 3 |
|
44 |
2.5% |
0.0246498599 |
| 4 |
|
14 |
0.8% |
0.0078431373 |
| 5 |
|
4 |
0.2% |
0.0022408964 |
| 6 |
|
3 |
0.2% |
0.0016806723 |
| 10 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005602241 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10236 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemeso
|
Variable label:
|
What specific climate measures you think politicians should prioritise
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are a number of measures that can help reduce greenhouse gas
emissions.
Based on the considerations you think are important, what specific
climate measures do you think politicians should prioritise?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemeso; p9k2_cemeso
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_ceefn
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think about the efforts being made to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway has set itself the objective of reducing greenhouse gas
emissions to prevent harmful climate change. In order to achieve the
objective of reducing emissions, a number of measures have been
initiated.
Overall, what do you think about the efforts being made to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions in Norway?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_ceefn; p9k2_ceefn
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if & (r26_group = 3)][Shown on the same page with
[r26k2_ceefm]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The efforts are too small |
1032 |
48.8% |
0.48794326 |
| 2 |
The efforts are appropriate |
795 |
37.6% |
0.37588652 |
| 3 |
The efforts are too great |
259 |
12.2% |
0.12245863 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01371158 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_ceefm
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think most people in Norway think about the efforts being
made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think most people in Norway think about the efforts being
made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Norway?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_ceefm; p9k2_ceefm
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if & (r26_group = 3)][Shown on the same page with
[r26k2_ceefn]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Most people in Norway think the efforts are too small |
636 |
30.1% |
0.30070922 |
| 2 |
Most people in Norway think the efforts are appropriate |
1192 |
56.4% |
0.56359338 |
| 3 |
Most people in Norway think the efforts are too great |
250 |
11.8% |
0.11820331 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
1.7% |
0.01749409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cecma
|
Variable label:
|
How the authorities should respond to climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities can respond to climate change in two main ways: by
reducing the causes of climate change (emissions), or by preparing for
the impacts of climate change (climate change adaptation).
What do you think – which of these strategies, if any, should be given
the highest priority in Norway?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cecma; p9k2_cecma
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Reduce emissions |
750 |
35.5% |
0.35460993 |
| 2 |
Climate change adaptation |
241 |
11.4% |
0.11394799 |
| 3 |
About the same amount for both |
1006 |
47.6% |
0.47565012 |
| 4 |
None of these |
86 |
4.1% |
0.04066194 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.5% |
0.01513002 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_heanr_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?: The World Health Organisation (WHO)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Antibiotic resistance means that bacteria cannot be killed by
antibiotics. When bacteria are resistant to antibiotics, infections
become more difficult to treat. They may last longer or, in the worst
case, cannot be treated. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a
growing problem. Overuse of antibiotics – both in humans and animals –
is a major cause of this.
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The World Health Organisation (WHO)
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_heanr_1; p9k2_heanr_1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
53 |
2.5% |
0.02505910 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
87 |
4.1% |
0.04113475 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
383 |
18.1% |
0.18108747 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
846 |
40.0% |
0.40000000 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
713 |
33.7% |
0.33711584 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.6% |
0.01560284 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_heanr_2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?: The EU
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Antibiotic resistance means that bacteria cannot be killed by
antibiotics. When bacteria are resistant to antibiotics, infections
become more difficult to treat. They may last longer or, in the worst
case, cannot be treated. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a
growing problem. Overuse of antibiotics – both in humans and animals –
is a major cause of this.
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The EU
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_heanr_2; p9k2_heanr_2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
59 |
2.8% |
0.02789598 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
115 |
5.4% |
0.05437352 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
485 |
22.9% |
0.22931442 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
816 |
38.6% |
0.38581560 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
590 |
27.9% |
0.27895981 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
2.4% |
0.02364066 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_heanr_3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?: National political authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Antibiotic resistance means that bacteria cannot be killed by
antibiotics. When bacteria are resistant to antibiotics, infections
become more difficult to treat. They may last longer or, in the worst
case, cannot be treated. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a
growing problem. Overuse of antibiotics – both in humans and animals –
is a major cause of this.
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?
|
|
Literal question:
|
National political authorities
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_heanr_3; p9k2_heanr_3
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
31 |
1.5% |
0.01465721 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
79 |
3.7% |
0.03735225 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
365 |
17.3% |
0.17257683 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
821 |
38.8% |
0.38817967 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
781 |
36.9% |
0.36926714 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
1.8% |
0.01796690 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_heanr_4
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?: National expert authorities (such as the Ministry of
Health and Care Services, the Norwegian Directorate of Health, the
Norwegian Institute of Public Health, the Ministry of Agriculture and
Food, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority, the Norwegian Veterinary
Institute)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Antibiotic resistance means that bacteria cannot be killed by
antibiotics. When bacteria are resistant to antibiotics, infections
become more difficult to treat. They may last longer or, in the worst
case, cannot be treated. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a
growing problem. Overuse of antibiotics – both in humans and animals –
is a major cause of this.
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?
|
|
Literal question:
|
National expert authorities (such as the Ministry of Health and Care
Services, the Norwegian Directorate of Health, the Norwegian Institute
of Public Health, the Ministry of Agriculture and Food, the Norwegian
Food Safety Authority, the Norwegian Veterinary Institute)
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_heanr_4; p9k2_heanr_4
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006146572 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
23 |
1.1% |
0.010874704 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
172 |
8.1% |
0.081323877 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
792 |
37.4% |
0.374468085 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
1080 |
51.1% |
0.510638298 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.7% |
0.016548463 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_heanr_5
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?: Local authorities (municipalities)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Antibiotic resistance means that bacteria cannot be killed by
antibiotics. When bacteria are resistant to antibiotics, infections
become more difficult to treat. They may last longer or, in the worst
case, cannot be treated. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a
growing problem. Overuse of antibiotics – both in humans and animals –
is a major cause of this.
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Local authorities (municipalities)
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_heanr_5; p9k2_heanr_5
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
173 |
8.2% |
0.08179669 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
405 |
19.1% |
0.19148936 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
636 |
30.1% |
0.30070922 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
496 |
23.5% |
0.23451537 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
354 |
16.7% |
0.16737589 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
2.4% |
0.02411348 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_heanr_6
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?: Doctors/other healthcare professionals/veterinarians
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Antibiotic resistance means that bacteria cannot be killed by
antibiotics. When bacteria are resistant to antibiotics, infections
become more difficult to treat. They may last longer or, in the worst
case, cannot be treated. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a
growing problem. Overuse of antibiotics – both in humans and animals –
is a major cause of this.
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Doctors/other healthcare professionals/veterinarians
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_heanr_6; p9k2_heanr_6
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
17 |
0.8% |
0.008037825 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
67 |
3.2% |
0.031678487 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
299 |
14.1% |
0.141371158 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
791 |
37.4% |
0.373995272 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
899 |
42.5% |
0.425059102 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2.0% |
0.019858156 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_heanr_7
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?: Individual citizens
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Antibiotic resistance means that bacteria cannot be killed by
antibiotics. When bacteria are resistant to antibiotics, infections
become more difficult to treat. They may last longer or, in the worst
case, cannot be treated. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a
growing problem. Overuse of antibiotics – both in humans and animals –
is a major cause of this.
To what extent do you think the following are responsible for regulating
antibiotic use?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Individual citizens
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_heanr_7; p9k2_heanr_7
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
94 |
4.4% |
0.04444444 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
218 |
10.3% |
0.10307329 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
589 |
27.8% |
0.27848700 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
606 |
28.7% |
0.28652482 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
568 |
26.9% |
0.26855792 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
1.9% |
0.01891253 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_hetanx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_hetanx].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_hetanx_ran; p9k2_hetanx_ran
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2095] [Invalid:9926]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
to you personally |
729 |
34.8% |
0.3479714 |
| 2 |
to Norway |
697 |
33.3% |
0.3326969 |
| 3 |
to the world |
669 |
31.9% |
0.3193317 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9926 |
|
NA |
r26k2_hetanx
|
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat do you think it will be [r26k2_hetanx_ran] if
antibiotics lose their effect?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat do you think it will be [r26k2_hetanx_ran] if
antibiotics lose their effect?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_hetanx; p9k2_hetanx
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
1193 |
56.4% |
0.564066194 |
| 2 |
Serious |
609 |
28.8% |
0.287943262 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
197 |
9.3% |
0.093144208 |
| 4 |
Not very serious |
71 |
3.4% |
0.033569740 |
| 5 |
Not a threat |
14 |
0.7% |
0.006619385 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.5% |
0.014657210 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9906 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dmcpwx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_dmcpwx].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Sveinung Arnesen (UiB/NORCE), Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB), Jon Kåre Skiple
(NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p9k2_dmcpwx_ran1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2091] [Invalid:9930]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the merger of municipalities |
1083 |
51.8% |
0.517934 |
| 2 |
the ban on begging |
1008 |
48.2% |
0.482066 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dmcpwx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_dmcpwx].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Sveinung Arnesen (UiB/NORCE), Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB), Jon Kåre Skiple
(NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p9k2_dmcpwx_ran2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2091] [Invalid:9930]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
For example, a citizen panel has been organised in Norway with 14 participants |
1090 |
52.1% |
0.5212817 |
| 2 |
For example, a citizen panel has been organised in Norway with 218 participants |
1001 |
47.9% |
0.4787183 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dmcpwx1
|
Variable label:
|
[r26k2_dmcpwx_ran2] for the occasion that the municipality you live in
will make a decision on [r26k2_dmcpwx_ran1]. How much influence should
results from the citizen panel have when the politicans are to make the
final decision?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would now like to ask you some questions about how Norwegian
municipalities should listen to input from citizens during an election
period.
Imagine that the municipality you live in must make a decision on
[r26k2_dmcpwx_ran1]. In order to hear the citizens’ opinion on the
matter, the municipality decides that a so-called citizen panel will be
conducted. A citizen panel consists of a municipality’s citizens who are
invited to participate after their names have been randomly selected.
[r26k2_dmcpwx_ran2]. Participants discuss in smaller groups and have the
opportunity to ask questions to experts. The event usually lasts a whole
day, and ends by measuring the participants’ opinion on the topic.
How much influence do you think the results from the citizen panel
should have when the politicians are to make the final decision?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Sveinung Arnesen (UiB/NORCE), Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB), Jon Kåre Skiple
(NORCE)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Shown on the same page with [r26k2_dmcpwx2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Complete influence (the result must be followed regardless) |
68 |
3.3% |
0.03252033 |
| 2 |
A lot of influence |
615 |
29.4% |
0.29411765 |
| 3 |
Some influence |
984 |
47.1% |
0.47058824 |
| 4 |
Little influence |
306 |
14.6% |
0.14634146 |
| 5 |
No influence (the result should not be taken into consideration at all) |
115 |
5.5% |
0.05499761 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.00143472 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dmcpwx2
|
Variable label:
|
How much influence a referendum should have, was it to be conducted
instead of a citizen panel
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much influence do you think a referendum should have, if a
referendum is conducted instead of a citizen panel?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Sveinung Arnesen (UiB/NORCE), Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB), Jon Kåre Skiple
(NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p9k2_dmcpwx2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Shown on the same page with [r26k2_dmcpwx1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Complete influence (the result must be followed regardless) |
572 |
27.4% |
0.273553324 |
| 2 |
A lot of influence |
1041 |
49.8% |
0.497847920 |
| 3 |
Some influence |
361 |
17.3% |
0.172644668 |
| 4 |
Little influence |
78 |
3.7% |
0.037302726 |
| 5 |
No influence (the result should not be taken into consideration at all) |
28 |
1.3% |
0.013390722 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005260641 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dmcpox_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_dmcpox].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Sveinung Arnesen (UiB/NORCE), Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB), Jon Kåre Skiple
(NORCE)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p9k2_dmcpox_ran
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2091] [Invalid:9930]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
538 |
25.7% |
0.2572932 |
| 2 |
, and that half (50%) of those invited participated |
525 |
25.1% |
0.2510760 |
| 3 |
, and that one in five (20%) of those invited participated |
505 |
24.2% |
0.2415112 |
| 4 |
, and that one in a hundred (1%) of those invited participated |
523 |
25.0% |
0.2501196 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dmcpox
|
Variable label:
|
How much influence you think results from the citizen panel should have
when the politicians make decisions
|
|
Literal question:
|
Technological developments now make it possible to conduct citizen
panels online. In principle, it is possible to invite all the citizens
of a municipality to participate instead of randomly selecting a small
group of citizens. Let us say that all citizens of the municipality are
invited to take part in the citizen panel [r26k2_dmcpox_ran].
How much influence do you think the results from the citizen panel
should have when the politicians are to make the final decision on the
matter?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Sveinung Arnesen (UiB/NORCE), Mikael Johannesson (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p9k2_dmcpox
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Complete influence (the result must be followed regardless) |
158 |
7.6% |
0.07556193 |
| 2 |
A lot of influence |
738 |
35.3% |
0.35294118 |
| 3 |
Some influence |
772 |
36.9% |
0.36920134 |
| 4 |
Little influence |
302 |
14.4% |
0.14442850 |
| 5 |
No influence (the result should not be taken into consideration at all) |
115 |
5.5% |
0.05499761 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.00286944 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_inelp_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: When Norway is to introduce a legal act from the EU, it
is more important that it is introduced in a way that is in accordance
with what Norwegian politicians want, rather than being introduced in a
way that is in accordance with what bureaucrats think is technically
correct.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When Norway introduces different types of legislation from the EU,
several considerations must be weighed up in relation to each other.
This applies to considerations regarding national interests,
professional justifications and international obligations.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
When Norway is to introduce a legal act from the EU, it is more
important that …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… it is introduced in a way that is in accordance with what Norwegian
politicians want, rather than being introduced in a way that is in
accordance with what bureaucrats think is technically correct.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Oddvar Eriksen (UiO/COMPLEX)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_inelp_1; p9k2_inelp_1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
143 |
6.8% |
0.06838833 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
401 |
19.2% |
0.19177427 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
506 |
24.2% |
0.24198948 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
648 |
31.0% |
0.30989957 |
| 5 |
Strongly agree |
365 |
17.5% |
0.17455763 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.3% |
0.01339072 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_inelp_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: When Norway is to introduce a legal act from the EU, it
is more important that it is introduced in a professionally justified
manner (by the authorities in Norway), rather than being introduced in
exactly the same way as other EU countries and institutions.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When Norway introduces different types of legislation from the EU,
several considerations must be weighed up in relation to each other.
This applies to considerations regarding national interests,
professional justifications and international obligations.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
When Norway is to introduce a legal act from the EU, it is more
important that …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… it is introduced in a professionally justified manner (by the
authorities in Norway), rather than being introduced in exactly the same
way as other EU countries and institutions.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Oddvar Eriksen (UiO/COMPLEX)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_inelp_2; p9k2_inelp_2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
51 |
2.4% |
0.02439024 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
190 |
9.1% |
0.09086561 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
329 |
15.7% |
0.15734099 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
906 |
43.3% |
0.43328551 |
| 5 |
Strongly agree |
573 |
27.4% |
0.27403156 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2.0% |
0.02008608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_inelp_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: When Norway is to introduce a legal act from the EU, it
is more important that It is introduced in a way that is as similar to
other EU countries and institutions as possible, rather than being
introduced in a way that Norwegian politicians want.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When Norway introduces different types of legislation from the EU,
several considerations must be weighed up in relation to each other.
This applies to considerations regarding national interests,
professional justifications and international obligations.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
When Norway is to introduce a legal act from the EU, it is more
important that …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… It is introduced in a way that is as similar to other EU countries and
institutions as possible, rather than being introduced in a way that
Norwegian politicians want.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Erik Oddvar Eriksen (UiO/COMPLEX)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_inelp_3; p9k2_inelp_3
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
476 |
22.8% |
0.22764228 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
656 |
31.4% |
0.31372549 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
402 |
19.2% |
0.19225251 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
403 |
19.3% |
0.19273075 |
| 5 |
Strongly agree |
108 |
5.2% |
0.05164993 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
2.2% |
0.02199904 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cesac
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: In order to meet society’s many needs, we should be open
to development in natural areas.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement?
In order to meet society’s many needs, we should be open to the
development in natural areas.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB), Vigdis Vandvik (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cesac; p9k2_cesac
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
73 |
3.5% |
0.0349115256 |
| 2 |
Agree |
233 |
11.1% |
0.1114299378 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
600 |
28.7% |
0.2869440459 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
103 |
4.9% |
0.0492587279 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
360 |
17.2% |
0.1721664275 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
401 |
19.2% |
0.1917742707 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
320 |
15.3% |
0.1530368245 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0004782401 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_ceforx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_ceforx].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB), Vigdis Vandvik (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_ceforx_ran1; p9k2_ceforx_ran1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2091] [Invalid:9930]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The purpose is more housing. |
355 |
17.0% |
0.1697752 |
| 2 |
The purpose is new jobs. |
321 |
15.4% |
0.1535151 |
| 3 |
The purpose is a primary school. |
353 |
16.9% |
0.1688187 |
| 4 |
The purpose is a cabin area. |
336 |
16.1% |
0.1606887 |
| 5 |
The purpose is renewable energy. |
379 |
18.1% |
0.1812530 |
| 6 |
The purpose is a new and better road. |
347 |
16.6% |
0.1659493 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_ceforx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_ceforx].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB), Vigdis Vandvik (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_ceforx_ran2; p9k2_ceforx_ran2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2091] [Invalid:9930]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The municipality is behind the proposal. |
1029 |
49.2% |
0.492109 |
| 2 |
A private contractor is behind the proposal. |
1062 |
50.8% |
0.507891 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cerivx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_cerivx].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB), Vigdis Vandvik (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cerivx_ran; p9k2_cerivx_ran
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2091] [Invalid:9930]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A consequence of the proposal is that three houses would have to be moved. |
372 |
17.8% |
0.1779053 |
| 2 |
A consequence of the proposal is that a playground would have to be moved. |
328 |
15.7% |
0.1568627 |
| 3 |
A consequence of the proposal is that a company with five workplaces would have
to be moved. |
351 |
16.8% |
0.1678623 |
| 4 |
A consequence of the proposal is that ten parking spaces would be removed. |
347 |
16.6% |
0.1659493 |
| 5 |
A consequence of the proposal is that you would have to take a 2 km longer road
trip to work. |
339 |
16.2% |
0.1621234 |
| 6 |
BLANK |
354 |
16.9% |
0.1692970 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_ceforx
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative to a proposal made to carry out major development in a
forest
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that close to where you live, there is a forest that is a
popular recreation area and a play area for the children in the
neighbourhood. The forest is also an important habitat for bird life. A
proposal has now been made to carry out a major development in this
area.
[r26k2_ceforx_ran1] [r26k2_ceforx_ran2]
How positive or negative would you be to the proposal?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB), Vigdis Vandvik (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_ceforx; p9k2_ceforx
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Shown in random order with [r26k2_cerivx]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
26 |
1.2% |
0.0124342420 |
| 2 |
Positive |
75 |
3.6% |
0.0358680057 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
189 |
9.0% |
0.0903873745 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
119 |
5.7% |
0.0569105691 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
413 |
19.8% |
0.1975131516 |
| 6 |
Negative |
584 |
27.9% |
0.2792922047 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
664 |
31.8% |
0.3175514108 |
| 8 |
Don’t know/no opinion |
19 |
0.9% |
0.0090865615 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009564802 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cerivx
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative to a proposal to widen the undeveloped marginal zone
along a river where you live with [r26k2_cerivx_ran] as a consequence
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that there is a river running through the area where you
live. The chief municipal executive proposes that the undeveloped
marginal zone along the river should be extended from 5 to 30 meters on
each side. Rivers should have a marginal zone that protects animal and
plant life in and along the river and limits pollution.
The new marginal zones along the river will serve as a recreation
area for people in the neighbourhood.
[r26k2_cerivx_ran]
How positive or negative would you be to the proposal?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB), Vigdis Vandvik (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cerivx; p9k2_cerivx
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Shown in random order with [r26k2_ceforx]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
601 |
28.7% |
0.287422286 |
| 2 |
Positive |
758 |
36.3% |
0.362505978 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
327 |
15.6% |
0.156384505 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
124 |
5.9% |
0.059301769 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
134 |
6.4% |
0.064084170 |
| 6 |
Negative |
71 |
3.4% |
0.033955045 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
40 |
1.9% |
0.019129603 |
| 8 |
Don’t know/no opinion |
29 |
1.4% |
0.013868962 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003347681 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cearex_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_cearex].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB), Vigdis Vandvik (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cearex_ran1; p9k2_cearex_ran1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2091] [Invalid:9930]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
an area of marshland |
529 |
25.3% |
0.2529890 |
| 2 |
an area of wetland |
531 |
25.4% |
0.2539455 |
| 3 |
a natural area |
514 |
24.6% |
0.2458154 |
| 4 |
a forest |
517 |
24.7% |
0.2472501 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cearex_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r26k2_cearex].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB), Vigdis Vandvik (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cearex_ran2; p9k2_cearex_ran2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r26k2_cearex_ran1] == 1 the value is set to 1. If
[r26k2_cearex_ran1] == 2 the value is set to 2. If [r26k2_cearex_ran1]
== 3 the value is set to 3. If [r26k2_cearex_ran1] == 4 the value is set
to 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2091] [Invalid:9930]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
this area of marshland |
529 |
25.3% |
0.2529890 |
| 2 |
this area of wetland |
531 |
25.4% |
0.2539455 |
| 3 |
this natural area |
514 |
24.6% |
0.2458154 |
| 4 |
this forest |
517 |
24.7% |
0.2472501 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cearex_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r26k2_cearex].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB), Vigdis Vandvik (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cearex_ran3; p9k2_cearex_ran3
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2091] [Invalid:9930]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
a large carpark |
417 |
19.9% |
0.1994261 |
| 2 |
parts of an industrial area |
400 |
19.1% |
0.1912960 |
| 3 |
agricultural land |
433 |
20.7% |
0.2070780 |
| 4 |
an area of sea through land reclamation |
420 |
20.1% |
0.2008608 |
| 5 |
an area of land by building more densely in the city centre |
421 |
20.1% |
0.2013391 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cearex
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative: Some municipal politicians propose to use
[r26k2_cearex_ran3] instead of [r26k2_cearex_ran1] for land for an
important social purpose.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that your municipality needs more land for an important
social purpose. The chief municipal executive proposes to use
[r26k2_cearex_ran1] near the city centre to get more land. At the same
time, [r26k2_cearex_ran2] is important for wildlife and many people use
it as a recreation area.
Therefore, some municipal politicians propose to use
[r26k2_cearex_ran3] instead.
How positive or negative would you be about the proposal to use
[r26k2_cearex_ran3] instead?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Endre Tvinnereim (UiB), Vigdis Vandvik (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cearex; p9k2_cearex
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
335 |
16.0% |
0.160210426 |
| 2 |
Positive |
518 |
24.8% |
0.247728360 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
378 |
18.1% |
0.180774749 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
230 |
11.0% |
0.109995218 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
221 |
10.6% |
0.105691057 |
| 6 |
Negative |
204 |
9.8% |
0.097560976 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
149 |
7.1% |
0.071257771 |
| 8 |
Don’t know/no opinion |
47 |
2.2% |
0.022477284 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.4% |
0.004304161 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_mefns_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you think that: you are able to recognise fake news on
social media?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what degree do you think that …
|
|
Literal question:
|
you are able to recognise fake news on social media?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO/MEGa)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_mefns_1; p9k2_mefns_1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
126 |
6.0% |
0.060258250 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
650 |
31.1% |
0.310856050 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
1103 |
52.7% |
0.527498804 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
182 |
8.7% |
0.087039694 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009086561 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005260641 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_mefns_2
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you think that: ordinary people are able to recognise
fake news on social media?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what degree do you think that …
|
|
Literal question:
|
ordinary people are able to recognise fake news on social media?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO/MEGa)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_mefns_2; p9k2_mefns_2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006217121 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
188 |
9.0% |
0.089909134 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
1382 |
66.1% |
0.660927786 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
458 |
21.9% |
0.219033955 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
31 |
1.5% |
0.014825442 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009086561 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_mefns_3
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you think that: bureaucrats are able to recognise fake
news on social media?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what degree do you think that …
|
|
Literal question:
|
bureaucrats are able to recognise fake news on social media?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO/MEGa)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_mefns_3; p9k2_mefns_3
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
77 |
3.7% |
0.036824486 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
728 |
34.8% |
0.348158776 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
1043 |
49.9% |
0.498804400 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
195 |
9.3% |
0.093256815 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
30 |
1.4% |
0.014347202 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008608321 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_mefns_4
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you think that: politicians are able to recognise fake
news on social media?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what degree do you think that …
|
|
Literal question:
|
politicians are able to recognise fake news on social media?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO/MEGa)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_mefns_4; p9k2_mefns_4
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
67 |
3.2% |
0.032042085 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
656 |
31.4% |
0.313725490 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
1091 |
52.2% |
0.521759923 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
215 |
10.3% |
0.102821616 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
42 |
2.0% |
0.020086083 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.0% |
0.009564802 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_mefns_5
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you think that: your own opinions are influenced by
the content of fake news on social media?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what degree do you think that …
|
|
Literal question:
|
your own opinions are influenced by the content of fake news on social
media?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO/MEGa)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_mefns_5; p9k2_mefns_5
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004782401 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
62 |
3.0% |
0.029650885 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
674 |
32.2% |
0.322333812 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
1002 |
47.9% |
0.479196557 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
321 |
15.4% |
0.153515065 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.1% |
0.010521282 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_mefns_6
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you think that: ordinary people’s opinions are
influenced by the content of fake news on social media?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what degree do you think that …
|
|
Literal question:
|
ordinary people’s opinions are influenced by the content of fake news on
social media?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO/MEGa)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_mefns_6; p9k2_mefns_6
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
36 |
1.7% |
0.017216643 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
398 |
19.0% |
0.190339550 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
1355 |
64.8% |
0.648015304 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
270 |
12.9% |
0.129124821 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006217121 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009086561 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_mefns_7
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you think that: bureaucrats’ opinions are influenced
by the content of fake news on social media?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what degree do you think that …
|
|
Literal question:
|
bureaucrats’ opinions are influenced by the content of fake news on
social media?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO/MEGa)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_mefns_7; p9k2_mefns_7
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008608321 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
145 |
6.9% |
0.069344811 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
1011 |
48.4% |
0.483500717 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
829 |
39.6% |
0.396461023 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
66 |
3.2% |
0.031563845 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.1% |
0.010521282 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_mefns_8
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you think that: politicians’ opinions are influenced
by the content of fake news on social media?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what degree do you think that …
|
|
Literal question:
|
politicians’ opinions are influenced by the content of fake news on
social media?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO/MEGa)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_mefns_8; p9k2_mefns_8
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
36 |
1.7% |
0.01721664 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
200 |
9.6% |
0.09564802 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
1068 |
51.1% |
0.51076040 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
713 |
34.1% |
0.34098517 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
52 |
2.5% |
0.02486848 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.1% |
0.01052128 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_mefnf
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: International tech companies should be fined if they
spread fake news.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
International tech companies (such as Facebook, Google, Instagram,
TikTok, and Twitter) should be fined if they spread fake news.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO/MEGa)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_mefnf; p9k2_mefnf
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
899 |
43.0% |
0.429937829 |
| 2 |
Agree |
706 |
33.8% |
0.337637494 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
252 |
12.1% |
0.120516499 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
135 |
6.5% |
0.064562410 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
33 |
1.6% |
0.015781923 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
40 |
1.9% |
0.019129603 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
0.6% |
0.005738881 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.7% |
0.006695361 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_lgcimx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent is exposed to an
introductory text before [r26k2_lgcimx].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Øivind Skorge (ONH/ISF), Francesca Jensenius (UiO), Eli Balterzen (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_lgcimx_ran; p9k2_lgcimx_ran
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2084] [Invalid:9937]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Under current legislation, rape is considered to be the act of having sexual
intercourse through the use of violence or threatening behaviour, or while the
other party cannot oppose the act. A lack of consent is not in itself sufficient
grounds for unwanted sexual intercourse to be prosecuted as rape. |
712 |
34.2% |
0.3416507 |
| 2 |
Under current legislation, rape is considered to be the act of having sexual
intercourse through the use of violence or threatening behaviour, or while the
other party cannot oppose the act. A lack of consent is not in itself sufficient
grounds for unwanted sexual intercourse to be prosecuted as rape, but the
publicly appointed Criminal Law Commission has proposed to include consent in
the law. |
708 |
34.0% |
0.3397313 |
| 3 |
BLANK |
664 |
31.9% |
0.3186180 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9937 |
|
NA |
r26k2_lgcimx
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think it is to ask for explicit consent before
having sex?
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r26k2_lgcimx_ran]
How important do you think it is to ask for explicit consent before
having sex?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Øivind Skorge (ONH/ISF), Francesca Jensenius (UiO), Eli Balterzen (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_lgcimx; p9k2_lgcimx
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
996 |
47.6% |
0.476327116 |
| 2 |
Important |
638 |
30.5% |
0.305117169 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
265 |
12.7% |
0.126733620 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
134 |
6.4% |
0.064084170 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
46 |
2.2% |
0.021999044 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.6% |
0.005738881 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_lgccax
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: the man’s actions should be defined as rape
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that a woman goes home with a man from a bar and falls asleep
in his bed. She wakes up from him touching her. She says no, but doesn’t
push him away. It ends with them having sexual intercourse.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
Regardless of what the current law is, I believe that the man’s actions
should be defined as rape.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Øivind Skorge (ONH/ISF), Francesca Jensenius (UiO), Eli Balterzen (UiO)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_lgccax; p9k2_lgccax
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
361 |
17.3% |
0.172644668 |
| 2 |
Agree |
550 |
26.3% |
0.263032042 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
439 |
21.0% |
0.209947394 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
284 |
13.6% |
0.135820182 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
214 |
10.2% |
0.102343376 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
179 |
8.6% |
0.085604974 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
51 |
2.4% |
0.024390244 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006217121 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_powpr_1
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas: The health services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The health services
|
|
Question owner:
|
Axel West Pedersen (OsloMet/NOVA), Tale Hellevik (OsloMet/NOVA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_powpr_1; p9k2_powpr_1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid:
Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much less |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003347681 |
| 2 |
A little less |
21 |
1.0% |
0.010043042 |
| 3 |
The same as now |
173 |
8.3% |
0.082735533 |
| 4 |
A little more |
563 |
26.9% |
0.269249163 |
| 5 |
Much more |
1292 |
61.8% |
0.617886179 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009086561 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.8% |
0.007651841 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_powpr_2
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas: The education system
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The education system
|
|
Question owner:
|
Axel West Pedersen (OsloMet/NOVA), Tale Hellevik (OsloMet/NOVA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_powpr_2; p9k2_powpr_2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid:
Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much less |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001912960 |
| 2 |
A little less |
28 |
1.3% |
0.013390722 |
| 3 |
The same as now |
490 |
23.4% |
0.234337637 |
| 4 |
A little more |
853 |
40.8% |
0.407938785 |
| 5 |
Much more |
661 |
31.6% |
0.316116691 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
40 |
1.9% |
0.019129603 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.7% |
0.007173601 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_powpr_3
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas: Kindergartens
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Kindergartens
|
|
Question owner:
|
Axel West Pedersen (OsloMet/NOVA), Tale Hellevik (OsloMet/NOVA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_powpr_3; p9k2_powpr_3
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid:
Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much less |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006217121 |
| 2 |
A little less |
69 |
3.3% |
0.032998565 |
| 3 |
The same as now |
875 |
41.8% |
0.418460067 |
| 4 |
A little more |
707 |
33.8% |
0.338115734 |
| 5 |
Much more |
351 |
16.8% |
0.167862267 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
57 |
2.7% |
0.027259684 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009086561 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_powpr_4
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas: Care for the elderly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Care for the elderly
|
|
Question owner:
|
Axel West Pedersen (OsloMet/NOVA), Tale Hellevik (OsloMet/NOVA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_powpr_4; p9k2_powpr_4
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid:
Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much less |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003347681 |
| 2 |
A little less |
12 |
0.6% |
0.005738881 |
| 3 |
The same as now |
137 |
6.6% |
0.065518890 |
| 4 |
A little more |
642 |
30.7% |
0.307030129 |
| 5 |
Much more |
1255 |
60.0% |
0.600191296 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
23 |
1.1% |
0.010999522 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.7% |
0.007173601 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_powpr_5
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas: Unemployment benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefit
|
|
Question owner:
|
Axel West Pedersen (OsloMet/NOVA), Tale Hellevik (OsloMet/NOVA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_powpr_5; p9k2_powpr_5
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid:
Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much less |
45 |
2.2% |
0.02152080 |
| 2 |
A little less |
158 |
7.6% |
0.07556193 |
| 3 |
The same as now |
978 |
46.8% |
0.46771879 |
| 4 |
A little more |
622 |
29.7% |
0.29746533 |
| 5 |
Much more |
187 |
8.9% |
0.08943089 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
80 |
3.8% |
0.03825921 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.0% |
0.01004304 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_powpr_6
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas: Social assistance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social assistance
|
|
Question owner:
|
Axel West Pedersen (OsloMet/NOVA), Tale Hellevik (OsloMet/NOVA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_powpr_6; p9k2_powpr_6
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid:
Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much less |
35 |
1.7% |
0.016738403 |
| 2 |
A little less |
114 |
5.5% |
0.054519369 |
| 3 |
The same as now |
612 |
29.3% |
0.292682927 |
| 4 |
A little more |
816 |
39.0% |
0.390243902 |
| 5 |
Much more |
440 |
21.0% |
0.210425634 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
58 |
2.8% |
0.027737924 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.8% |
0.007651841 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_powpr_7
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas: Retirement pension
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Retirement pension
|
|
Question owner:
|
Axel West Pedersen (OsloMet/NOVA), Tale Hellevik (OsloMet/NOVA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_powpr_7; p9k2_powpr_7
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid:
Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much less |
8 |
0.4% |
0.003825921 |
| 2 |
A little less |
49 |
2.3% |
0.023433764 |
| 3 |
The same as now |
533 |
25.5% |
0.254901961 |
| 4 |
A little more |
819 |
39.2% |
0.391678623 |
| 5 |
Much more |
631 |
30.2% |
0.301769488 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
37 |
1.8% |
0.017694883 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.7% |
0.006695361 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_powpr_8
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas: Disability benefits
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefits
|
|
Question owner:
|
Axel West Pedersen (OsloMet/NOVA), Tale Hellevik (OsloMet/NOVA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_powpr_8; p9k2_powpr_8
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid:
Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much less |
50 |
2.4% |
0.02391200 |
| 2 |
A little less |
162 |
7.7% |
0.07747489 |
| 3 |
The same as now |
673 |
32.2% |
0.32185557 |
| 4 |
A little more |
737 |
35.2% |
0.35246294 |
| 5 |
Much more |
379 |
18.1% |
0.18125299 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
69 |
3.3% |
0.03299857 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.0% |
0.01004304 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_powpr_9
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas: Educational grants and loans
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think the public sector should spend more or less money in the
following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Educational grants and loans
|
|
Question owner:
|
Axel West Pedersen (OsloMet/NOVA), Tale Hellevik (OsloMet/NOVA)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_powpr_9; p9k2_powpr_9
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)] [Display order of questions in grid:
Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much less |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005260641 |
| 2 |
A little less |
54 |
2.6% |
0.025824964 |
| 3 |
The same as now |
707 |
33.8% |
0.338115734 |
| 4 |
A little more |
881 |
42.1% |
0.421329507 |
| 5 |
Much more |
362 |
17.3% |
0.173122908 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
53 |
2.5% |
0.025346724 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.1% |
0.010999522 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_pcrur
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for
non-urban/rural Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
assertion?
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_pcrur; p9k2_pcrur
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
357 |
17.1% |
0.170731707 |
| 2 |
Agree |
448 |
21.4% |
0.214251554 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
481 |
23.0% |
0.230033477 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
362 |
17.3% |
0.173122908 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
175 |
8.4% |
0.083692013 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
176 |
8.4% |
0.084170253 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
78 |
3.7% |
0.037302726 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.7% |
0.006695361 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9930 |
|
NA |
r26k2_porpl
|
Variable label:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?: Reserve more parental
leave days for the father/co-mother
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reserve more parental leave days for the father/co-mother
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_porpl; p9k2_porpl
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4)]
[Posed as part of a grid with [r26k2_pocch], [r26k2_dvras], and
[r26k2_cectx]]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
176 |
4.2% |
0.04184498 |
| 2 |
Good proposal |
507 |
12.1% |
0.12054208 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good proposal |
472 |
11.2% |
0.11222064 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad proposal |
1588 |
37.8% |
0.37755587 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
503 |
12.0% |
0.11959106 |
| 6 |
Bad proposal |
539 |
12.8% |
0.12815026 |
| 7 |
Very bad proposal |
370 |
8.8% |
0.08796957 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
1.2% |
0.01212553 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7815 |
|
NA |
r26k2_pocch
|
Variable label:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?: Make more space for
Christian cultural heritage in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Make more space for Christian cultural heritage in Norway
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_pocch; p9k2_pocch
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4)]
[Posed as part of a grid with [r26k2_porpl], [r26k2_dvras], and
[r26k2_cectx]]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
362 |
8.6% |
0.086067523 |
| 2 |
Good proposal |
599 |
14.2% |
0.142415597 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good proposal |
562 |
13.4% |
0.133618640 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad proposal |
1030 |
24.5% |
0.244888255 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
447 |
10.6% |
0.106276748 |
| 6 |
Bad proposal |
626 |
14.9% |
0.148834998 |
| 7 |
Very bad proposal |
540 |
12.8% |
0.128388017 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
1.0% |
0.009510223 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7815 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dvras
|
Variable label:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?: Accept fewer asylum
seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Accept fewer asylum seekers
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_dvras; p9k2_dvras
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4)]
[Posed as part of a grid with [r26k2_porpl], [r26k2_pocch], and
[r26k2_cectx]]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
310 |
7.4% |
0.073704232 |
| 2 |
Good proposal |
366 |
8.7% |
0.087018545 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good proposal |
408 |
9.7% |
0.097004280 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad proposal |
1034 |
24.6% |
0.245839277 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
763 |
18.1% |
0.181407513 |
| 6 |
Bad proposal |
942 |
22.4% |
0.223965763 |
| 7 |
Very bad proposal |
342 |
8.1% |
0.081312411 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
1.0% |
0.009747979 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7815 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cectx
|
Variable label:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?: Increase the carbon
tax on petrol and diesel
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase the carbon tax on petrol and diesel
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cectx; p9k2_cectx
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4)]
[Posed as part of a grid with [r26k2_porpl], [r26k2_pocch], and
[r26k2_dvras]]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good proposal |
239 |
5.7% |
0.05682359 |
| 2 |
Good proposal |
561 |
13.3% |
0.13338088 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good proposal |
596 |
14.2% |
0.14170233 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad proposal |
631 |
15.0% |
0.15002378 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
619 |
14.7% |
0.14717071 |
| 6 |
Bad proposal |
758 |
18.0% |
0.18021874 |
| 7 |
Very bad proposal |
758 |
18.0% |
0.18021874 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
1.0% |
0.01046125 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7815 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemeax_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent is exposed to
[r26k2_cemeax_a] or [r26k2_cemeax_b].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ingrid K Faleide (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemeax_ran; p9k2_cemeax_ran
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2081] [Invalid:9940]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The respondent is exposed to [r26k2_cemeax_a] |
1045 |
50.2% |
0.5021624 |
| 2 |
The respondent is exposed to [r26k2_cemeax_b] |
1036 |
49.8% |
0.4978376 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9940 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemeax_a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Canteens should have a meat-free day once per week in
order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
Canteens should have a meat-free day once per week in order to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ingrid K Faleide (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemeax_a; p9k2_cemeax_a
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26k2_cemeax_ran = 1) & (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
170 |
16.3% |
0.16267943 |
| 2 |
Agree |
370 |
35.4% |
0.35406699 |
| 3 |
Disagree |
298 |
28.5% |
0.28516746 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
193 |
18.5% |
0.18468900 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.3% |
0.01339713 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10976 |
|
NA |
r26k2_cemeax_b
|
Variable label:
|
Most people in Norway agree/disagree: Canteens should have a meat-free
day once per week in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, do you think that most people in Norway agree or disagree
with the following views?
Canteens should have a meat-free day once per week in order to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions.
Most people:
|
|
Question owner:
|
Ingrid K Faleide (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_cemeax_b; p9k2_cemeax_b
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26k2_cemeax_ran = 2) & (r26_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
416 |
40.2% |
0.40154440 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
598 |
57.7% |
0.57722008 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
2.1% |
0.02123552 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10985 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dvsayx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects and element for textpiping in
[r26k2_dvsayx].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Marc Helbling (UiM), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Paul M. Sniderman
(Stanford), Richard Traunmüller (Universitet i Mannheim)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_dvsayx_ran1; p9k2_dvsayx_ran1
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4173] [Invalid:7848]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
politics |
1385 |
33.2% |
0.3318955 |
| 2 |
Muslims in Norway |
1400 |
33.5% |
0.3354901 |
| 3 |
racism and discrimination in Norway |
1388 |
33.3% |
0.3326144 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7848 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dvsayx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects and element for textpiping in
[r26k2_dvsayx].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Marc Helbling (UiM), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Paul M. Sniderman
(Stanford), Richard Traunmüller (Universitet i Mannheim)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_dvsayx_ran2; p9k2_dvsayx_ran2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4173] [Invalid:7848]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
among family and friends |
2085 |
50.0% |
0.4996405 |
| 2 |
at work |
2088 |
50.0% |
0.5003595 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7848 |
|
NA |
r26k2_dvsayx
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think you are free to say what is on your mind about
[r26k2_dvsayx_ran1] if this is a discussion point [r26k2_dvsayx_ran2]?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think you are free to say what is on your mind about
[r26k2_dvsayx_ran1] if this is a discussion point [r26k2_dvsayx_ran2]?
|
|
Post-question:
|
[r26k2_dvsayx_mask]
|
|
Question owner:
|
Marc Helbling (Universitet i Mannheim), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB),
Paul M. Sniderman (Stanford), Richard Traunmüller (Universitet i
Mannheim)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4)]
[If [r26k2_dvsayx_ran2] == 2 the respondent was exposed to the text ‘If
you are currently employed or self-employed, consider the last time you
were in such positions. If the question does not fit your current
situation, press ’Next’.’]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, always |
1172 |
27.9% |
0.27864955 |
| 2 |
Yes, usually |
2098 |
49.9% |
0.49881122 |
| 3 |
No, usually not |
597 |
14.2% |
0.14194009 |
| 4 |
No, never |
124 |
2.9% |
0.02948169 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
215 |
5.1% |
0.05111745 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7815 |
|
NA |
r26k2_bgurb
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_bgurb; p9k2_bgurb
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
1030 |
24.5% |
0.24488825 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
882 |
21.0% |
0.20970043 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
1165 |
27.7% |
0.27698526 |
| 4 |
A village |
594 |
14.1% |
0.14122682 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
488 |
11.6% |
0.11602473 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
47 |
1.1% |
0.01117451 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7815 |
|
NA |
r26_pcscc
|
Variable label:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I don’t believe that the climate is changing. |
57 |
0.7% |
0.007293666 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
310 |
4.0% |
0.039667306 |
| 3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent
due to human action |
1680 |
21.5% |
0.214971209 |
| 4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to
human action. |
5733 |
73.4% |
0.733589251 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.4% |
0.004478567 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26k2_pcwcc
|
Variable label:
|
How worried are you about climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How worried are you about climate change?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Gisle Andersen (NORCE), Åsta Dyrnes Nordø (NORCE), Thea Gregersen
(NORCE), Endre Tvinnereim (UiB)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_pcwcc; p9k2_pcwcc
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2,3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all worried |
441 |
4.4% |
0.044410876 |
| 2 |
Not very worried |
1404 |
14.1% |
0.141389728 |
| 3 |
Somewhat worried |
3078 |
31.0% |
0.309969789 |
| 4 |
Worried |
3421 |
34.5% |
0.344511581 |
| 5 |
Very worried |
1559 |
15.7% |
0.156998993 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.3% |
0.002719033 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2091 |
|
NA |
r26_pcgro
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of
industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
assertion:
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of
industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2) | (r26_group = 1) | (r26_group = 1,2) |
(r26_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
289 |
3.7% |
0.036980166 |
| 2 |
Agree |
753 |
9.6% |
0.096353167 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1727 |
22.1% |
0.220985285 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
957 |
12.2% |
0.122456814 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1747 |
22.4% |
0.223544466 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1551 |
19.8% |
0.198464491 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
760 |
9.7% |
0.097248880 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
0.4% |
0.003966731 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26_pcoil
|
Variable label:
|
Development of the oil and gas industry in Norway. In 10 to 15 years,
the industry should be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
There is frequent debate about how the oil and gas industry in Norway
should be developed over the next 10 to 15 years. Which of the following
options is closest to your view?
In 10 to 15 years, the oil and gas industry should be…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2) | (r26_group = 1) | (r26_group = 1,2) |
(r26_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
As large as possible |
465 |
6.0% |
0.059500960 |
| 2 |
Larger than today |
598 |
7.7% |
0.076519514 |
| 3 |
Just as large as today |
2572 |
32.9% |
0.329110685 |
| 4 |
Smaller than today |
2876 |
36.8% |
0.368010237 |
| 5 |
As small as possible |
1253 |
16.0% |
0.160332694 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
0.7% |
0.006525912 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4206 |
|
NA |
r26k2_popncx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent will be exposed to
[r26k2_popncx_a], [r26k2_popncx_b], or both.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Diana Mutz (Stanford)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_popncx_ran; p9k2_popncx_ran
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4206] [Invalid:7815]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Exposed to [r26k2_popncx_a] |
1359 |
32.3% |
0.3231098 |
| 2 |
Exposed to [r26k2_popncx_b] |
1436 |
34.1% |
0.3414170 |
| 3 |
Exposed to both |
1411 |
33.5% |
0.3354731 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7815 |
|
NA |
r26k2_popncx_rekkefolge
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects the order between [r26k2_popncx_a] and
[r26k2_popncx_b].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Diana Mutz (Stanford)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_popncx_rekkefolge; p9k2_popncx_rekkefolge
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomised if [r26k2_popncx_ran] == 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1411] [Invalid:10610]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Exposed to [r26k2_popncx_a] early and [r26k2_popncx_b] late |
703 |
49.8% |
0.4982282 |
| 2 |
Exposed to [r26k2_popncx_b] early and [r26k2_popncx_a] late |
708 |
50.2% |
0.5017718 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10610 |
|
NA |
r26k2_popncx_a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The Norwegian authorities should concentrate on
safeguarding the welfare of Norwegian citizens and not involve
themselves so much in other countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
The Norwegian authorities should concentrate on safeguarding the welfare
of Norwegian citizens and not involve themselves so much in other
countries.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Diana Mutz (Stanford)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p9k2_popncx_a; f3k2_popncx_a
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4) & [r26k2_popncx_ran] = 1 | 3] [If
[r26k2_popncx_ran] = 3 the order of [r26k2_popncx_a] and
[r26k2_popncx_b] randomised. The first question was posed after
[r26k2_dminfx] and the second question after [r26k2_cectx].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
377 |
13.6% |
0.13610108 |
| 2 |
Agree |
845 |
30.5% |
0.30505415 |
| 3 |
Disagree |
1210 |
43.7% |
0.43682310 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
304 |
11.0% |
0.10974729 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
34 |
1.2% |
0.01227437 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9251 |
|
NA |
r26k2_popncx_b
|
Variable label:
|
Most people in Norway agree/disagree: The Norwegian authorities should
concentrate on safeguarding the welfare of Norwegian citizens and not
involve themselves so much in other countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, do you think that most people in Norway agree or disagree
with the following views?
The Norwegian authorities should concentrate on safeguarding the welfare
of Norwegian citizens and not involve themselves so much in other
countries.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Diana Mutz (Stanford)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p9k2_popncx_b; f3k2_popncx_b
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4) & [r26k2_popncx_ran] = 2 | 3] [If
[r26k2_popncx_ran] = 3 the order of [r26k2_popncx_a] and
[r26k2_popncx_b] randomised. The first question was posed after
[r26k2_dminfx] and the second question after [r26k2_cectx].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
1819 |
63.9% |
0.63891816 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
995 |
34.9% |
0.34949069 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.2% |
0.01159115 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9174 |
|
NA |
r26k2_popnwx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent will be exposed to
[r26k2_popnwx_a], [r26k2_popnwx_b], or both.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Diana Mutz (Stanford)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_popnwx_ran; p9k2_popnwx_ran
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4206] [Invalid:7815]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Exposed to [r26k2_popnwx_a] |
1458 |
34.7% |
0.3466476 |
| 2 |
Exposed to [r26k2_popnwx_b] |
1385 |
32.9% |
0.3292915 |
| 3 |
Exposed to both |
1363 |
32.4% |
0.3240609 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7815 |
|
NA |
r26k2_popnwx_rekkefolge
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects the order between [r26k2_popnwx_a] and
[r26k2_popnwx_b].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Diana Mutz (Stanford)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_popnwx_rekkefolge; p9k2_popnwx_rekkefolge
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomised if [r26k2_popnwx_ran] == 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1363] [Invalid:10658]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Exposed to [r26k2_popnwx_a] early and [r26k2_popnwx_b] late |
695 |
51.0% |
0.5099046 |
| 2 |
Exposed to [r26k2_popnwx_b] early and [r26k2_popnwx_a] late |
668 |
49.0% |
0.4900954 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10658 |
|
NA |
r26k2_popnwx_a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It is best for the country’s future if we stay away from
world politics as much as possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
It is best for the country’s future if we stay away from world politics
as much as possible.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Diana Mutz (Stanford)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p9k2_popnwx_a; f3k2_popnwx_a
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4) & [r26k2_popnwx_ran] = 1 | 3] [If
[r26k2_popnwx_ran] = 3 the order of [r26k2_popnwx_a] and
[r26k2_popnwx_b] randomised. The first question was posed after
[r26k2_dminfx] and the second question after [r26k2_cectx].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
70 |
2.5% |
0.02481390 |
| 2 |
Agree |
343 |
12.2% |
0.12158809 |
| 3 |
Disagree |
1514 |
53.7% |
0.53668912 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
850 |
30.1% |
0.30131159 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
1.6% |
0.01559731 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9200 |
|
NA |
r26k2_popnwx_b
|
Variable label:
|
Most people in Norway agree/disagree: It is best for the country’s
future if we stay away from world politics as much as possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, do you think that most people in Norway agree or disagree
with the following views?
It is best for the country’s future if we stay away from world politics
as much as possible.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Diana Mutz (Stanford)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p9k2_popnwx_b; f3k2_popnwx_b
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 3,4) & [r26k2_popnwx_ran] = 2 | 3] [If
[r26k2_popnwx_ran] = 3 the order of [r26k2_popnwx_a] and
[r26k2_popnwx_b] randomised. The first question was posed after
[r26k2_dminfx] and the second question after [r26k2_cectx].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
664 |
24.2% |
0.24163028 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
2025 |
73.7% |
0.73689956 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
2.1% |
0.02147016 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9273 |
|
NA |
r26k2_bglrs
|
Variable label:
|
Personal placement on political left and right wing scale
|
|
Literal question:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right
wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left
politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_bglrs; p9k2_bglrs
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2) | (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11690] [Invalid:331]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Left wing |
239 |
2.0% |
0.02044482 |
| 1 |
1 |
657 |
5.6% |
0.05620188 |
| 2 |
2 |
1372 |
11.7% |
0.11736527 |
| 3 |
3 |
1582 |
13.5% |
0.13532934 |
| 4 |
4 |
1283 |
11.0% |
0.10975192 |
| 5 |
5 |
1633 |
14.0% |
0.13969204 |
| 6 |
6 |
1257 |
10.8% |
0.10752780 |
| 7 |
7 |
1530 |
13.1% |
0.13088109 |
| 8 |
8 |
1407 |
12.0% |
0.12035928 |
| 9 |
9 |
480 |
4.1% |
0.04106074 |
| 10 |
10 - Right wing |
250 |
2.1% |
0.02138580 |
| Sysmiss |
|
331 |
|
NA |
r26k2_pcpar
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_pcpar
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2) | (r26_group = 3,4)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
342 |
2.8% |
0.028450212 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
3328 |
27.7% |
0.276848848 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
843 |
7.0% |
0.070127277 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
546 |
4.5% |
0.045420514 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1389 |
11.6% |
0.115547791 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
477 |
4.0% |
0.039680559 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
566 |
4.7% |
0.047084269 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2020 |
16.8% |
0.168039265 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
812 |
6.8% |
0.067548457 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
305 |
2.5% |
0.025372265 |
| 11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
514 |
4.3% |
0.042758506 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
202 |
1.7% |
0.016803926 |
| 13 |
Other: |
596 |
5.0% |
0.049579902 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
0.7% |
0.006738208 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
r26k2_pcpar_13_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2) | (r26_group = 3,4)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12021] [Range:-]
|
r26k2_pcsad
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Question owner:
|
Lise Bjånesøy (UiB), Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB), Åsa von Schoultz (UiH)
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_pcsad; p9k2_pcsad
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2) | (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
1935 |
16.1% |
0.160968305 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
6247 |
52.0% |
0.519673904 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2532 |
21.1% |
0.210631395 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
1011 |
8.4% |
0.084102820 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
283 |
2.4% |
0.023542135 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.1% |
0.001081441 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
r26k2_pcecs
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in
Norway?
Do you think it is:
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_pcecs; p9k2_pcecs
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
1328 |
13.4% |
0.134060166 |
| 2 |
Good |
3515 |
35.5% |
0.354835453 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
1908 |
19.3% |
0.192610539 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
990 |
10.0% |
0.099939431 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
1466 |
14.8% |
0.147991116 |
| 6 |
Bad |
532 |
5.4% |
0.053704825 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
147 |
1.5% |
0.014839491 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.2% |
0.002018978 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2115 |
|
NA |
r26k2_pceum
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_pceum; p9k2_pceum
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
1024 |
10.3% |
0.103371694 |
| 2 |
Positive |
1601 |
16.2% |
0.161619221 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
1358 |
13.7% |
0.137088633 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
1237 |
12.5% |
0.124873814 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
1348 |
13.6% |
0.136079144 |
| 6 |
Negative |
1596 |
16.1% |
0.161114476 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
1654 |
16.7% |
0.166969513 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
88 |
0.9% |
0.008883505 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2115 |
|
NA |
r26k2_pceea
|
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_pceea; p9k2_pceea
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
1143 |
11.5% |
0.11538462 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
2491 |
25.1% |
0.25146376 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
2804 |
28.3% |
0.28306077 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1098 |
11.1% |
0.11084191 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1281 |
12.9% |
0.12931557 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
583 |
5.9% |
0.05885322 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
361 |
3.6% |
0.03644256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
145 |
1.5% |
0.01463759 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2115 |
|
NA |
r26k2_bgedu
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the highest level of completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_bgedu; p9k2_bgedu
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,3,4)][Posed if there was no information on
education for the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021]
[Range:-]
|
r26k2_bgedu_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education: None of the above
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is the highest level of completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
None of the above
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_bgedu_12_other; p9k2_bgedu_12_other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,3,4)][Posed if there was no information on
education for the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:12021] [Range:-]
|
r26k2_bginc
|
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_bginc; p9k2_bginc
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,2) | (r26_group = 3,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than 150 000 |
352 |
2.9% |
0.02928209 |
| 2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
1218 |
10.1% |
0.10132269 |
| 3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
1797 |
14.9% |
0.14948840 |
| 4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1798 |
15.0% |
0.14957158 |
| 5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
1733 |
14.4% |
0.14416438 |
| 6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
1674 |
13.9% |
0.13925630 |
| 7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
2057 |
17.1% |
0.17111721 |
| 8 |
More than 1 000000 |
1082 |
9.0% |
0.09000915 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
310 |
2.6% |
0.02578820 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
r26k2_bgchi
|
Variable label:
|
Living with children under 16 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you,
most of or part of the time, and if so, how many?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f3k2_bgchi; p9k2_bgchi
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group = 1,4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
None |
6799 |
81.6% |
0.8162064826 |
| 1 |
1 |
636 |
7.6% |
0.0763505402 |
| 2 |
2 |
608 |
7.3% |
0.0729891957 |
| 3 |
3 |
166 |
2.0% |
0.0199279712 |
| 4 |
4 |
20 |
0.2% |
0.0024009604 |
| 5 |
5 |
3 |
0.0% |
0.0003601441 |
| 6 |
6 or more |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002400960 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
96 |
1.2% |
0.0115246098 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3691 |
|
NA |
r26_cearlo_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects whether the respondent will be exposed to
[r26_cearlo].
|
|
Question owner:
|
Kjersti Fløttum (UiB), Dag Elgesem (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomised if [r26_group] == 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6229] [Invalid:5792]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Is not exposed to [r26_cearlo] |
3080 |
49.4% |
0.4944614 |
| 1 |
Is exposed to [r26_cearlo] |
3149 |
50.6% |
0.5055386 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5792 |
|
NA |
r26_cearlo
|
Variable label:
|
What words or arguments would you use to motivate people to live in a
climate-friendly manner?
|
|
Literal question:
|
This question is about climate and language. How climate is talked
about can affect people’s willingness to make climate-friendly choices
in everyday life.
Imagine that you were tasked with motivating people to live in a
climate-friendly manner. What words or arguments would you use?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses
are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if
you prefer.
|
|
Question owner:
|
Kjersti Fløttum (UiB), Dag Elgesem (UiB)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r26_group == 2) or [r26_cearlo_ran] == 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021]
[Range:-]
|
r26_avslutt
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Feedback about the survey
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12021]
[Range:-]
|
r26P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
6107 |
50.8% |
0.5080276 |
| 2 |
Female |
5914 |
49.2% |
0.4919724 |
r26P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
1844 |
15.3% |
0.15339822 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
4389 |
36.5% |
0.36511106 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
593 |
4.9% |
0.04933034 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
3305 |
27.5% |
0.27493553 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
966 |
8.0% |
0.08035937 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
924 |
7.7% |
0.07686549 |
r26P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:3-54]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
1844 |
15.3% |
0.15339822 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
1124 |
9.4% |
0.09350304 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
491 |
4.1% |
0.04084519 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
462 |
3.8% |
0.03843274 |
| 30 |
Viken |
2774 |
23.1% |
0.23076283 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
679 |
5.6% |
0.05648449 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
936 |
7.8% |
0.07786374 |
| 42 |
Agder |
593 |
4.9% |
0.04933034 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
1690 |
14.1% |
0.14058731 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
966 |
8.0% |
0.08035937 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
462 |
3.8% |
0.03843274 |
r26P3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Constituencies parliament election 2021
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12006] [Invalid:15]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Østfold |
570 |
4.7% |
0.047476262 |
| 1 |
Akershus |
1664 |
13.9% |
0.138597368 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
1839 |
15.3% |
0.153173413 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
356 |
3.0% |
0.029651841 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
323 |
2.7% |
0.026903215 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
538 |
4.5% |
0.044810928 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
610 |
5.1% |
0.050807929 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
325 |
2.7% |
0.027069798 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
209 |
1.7% |
0.017407963 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
384 |
3.2% |
0.031984008 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
1123 |
9.4% |
0.093536565 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
1481 |
12.3% |
0.123354989 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
207 |
1.7% |
0.017241379 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
489 |
4.1% |
0.040729635 |
| 16 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
777 |
6.5% |
0.064717641 |
| 15 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
188 |
1.6% |
0.015658837 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
461 |
3.8% |
0.038397468 |
| 18 |
Troms |
350 |
2.9% |
0.029152091 |
| 19 |
Finnmark |
112 |
0.9% |
0.009328669 |
| Sysmiss |
|
15 |
|
NA |
r26P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
559 |
4.7% |
0.04650195 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
3647 |
30.3% |
0.30338574 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
7699 |
64.0% |
0.64046252 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
116 |
1.0% |
0.00964978 |
r26P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
27 |
0.2% |
0.002246069 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
532 |
4.4% |
0.044255886 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
1069 |
8.9% |
0.088927710 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1466 |
12.2% |
0.121953248 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
1109 |
9.2% |
0.092255220 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
1003 |
8.3% |
0.083437318 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2569 |
21.4% |
0.213709342 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
883 |
7.3% |
0.073454787 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
902 |
7.5% |
0.075035355 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
2018 |
16.8% |
0.167872889 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
324 |
2.7% |
0.026952833 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
58 |
0.5% |
0.004824890 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
61 |
0.5% |
0.005074453 |
r26P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
250 |
2.1% |
0.02079694 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
1896 |
15.8% |
0.15772398 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
3102 |
25.8% |
0.25804842 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
2762 |
23.0% |
0.22976458 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
1850 |
15.4% |
0.15389735 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
1227 |
10.2% |
0.10207138 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
934 |
7.8% |
0.07769736 |
r26P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
5248 |
43.7% |
0.43656934 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
5839 |
48.6% |
0.48573330 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
934 |
7.8% |
0.07769736 |
r26_Weight1stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, and age
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-0]
|
r26_Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, and age. See documentation report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-9]
|
r26_Weight2stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, P4_1, and age
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11905] [Invalid:116]
[Range:0-0]
|
r26_Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1, and age. See documentation
report.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-55]
|
r26_Weight3
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1, and age. Similiar to
r26_Weight2, only with capped weight value (x is >= .2 and x <=
5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-5]
|
r26_Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to r26_Weight3 only with capped weight value (x is >=
.2 and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-5]
|
r26_Weight5
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1) upper
secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and age.
Weight values are capped (x is >= .2 and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0.2524625 |
|
2051 |
17.1% |
0.1706180850 |
| 0.2803854 |
|
1841 |
15.3% |
0.1531486565 |
| 0.5173352 |
|
24 |
0.2% |
0.0019965061 |
| 0.6722442 |
|
35 |
0.3% |
0.0029115714 |
| 0.7292241 |
|
1559 |
13.0% |
0.1296897097 |
| 0.7722188 |
|
2027 |
16.9% |
0.1686215789 |
| 0.9319763 |
|
1416 |
11.8% |
0.1177938607 |
| 1.1030402 |
|
24 |
0.2% |
0.0019965061 |
| 1.2553403 |
|
19 |
0.2% |
0.0015805673 |
| 1.4060929 |
|
1062 |
8.8% |
0.0883453956 |
| 2.3335375 |
|
608 |
5.1% |
0.0505781549 |
| 2.3382905 |
|
828 |
6.9% |
0.0688794609 |
| 2.5999692 |
|
144 |
1.2% |
0.0119790367 |
| 3.0588083 |
|
77 |
0.6% |
0.0064054571 |
| 3.4452599 |
|
6 |
0.0% |
0.0004991265 |
| 4.4118424 |
|
167 |
1.4% |
0.0138923550 |
| 4.9870052 |
|
125 |
1.0% |
0.0103984693 |
| 5.0000000 |
|
8 |
0.1% |
0.0006655020 |
r20bk26
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
13 |
0.2% |
0.001794836 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
292 |
4.0% |
0.040314787 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
588 |
8.1% |
0.081181831 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
803 |
11.1% |
0.110865663 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
686 |
9.5% |
0.094712136 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
612 |
8.4% |
0.084495375 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
1571 |
21.7% |
0.216899075 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
525 |
7.2% |
0.072483777 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
524 |
7.2% |
0.072345713 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of
Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of
Science in Business and Economics)) |
1297 |
17.9% |
0.179069446 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
206 |
2.8% |
0.028441254 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
85 |
1.2% |
0.011735469 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
0.6% |
0.005660638 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4778 |
|
NA |
r22bk26_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0012531328 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
71 |
4.4% |
0.0444862155 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
158 |
9.9% |
0.0989974937 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
213 |
13.3% |
0.1334586466 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
149 |
9.3% |
0.0933583960 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
128 |
8.0% |
0.0802005013 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
315 |
19.7% |
0.1973684211 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
107 |
6.7% |
0.0670426065 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
123 |
7.7% |
0.0770676692 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of
Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of
Science in Business and Economics)) |
269 |
16.9% |
0.1685463659 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
43 |
2.7% |
0.0269423559 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006265664 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.1% |
0.0106516291 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r25_bgedu
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the highest level of completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
5 |
0.3% |
0.003205128 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
62 |
4.0% |
0.039743590 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
150 |
9.6% |
0.096153846 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
205 |
13.1% |
0.131410256 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
154 |
9.9% |
0.098717949 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
110 |
7.1% |
0.070512821 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
329 |
21.1% |
0.210897436 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
114 |
7.3% |
0.073076923 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
113 |
7.2% |
0.072435897 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of
Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of
Science in Business and Economics)) |
241 |
15.4% |
0.154487179 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
46 |
2.9% |
0.029487179 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
15 |
1.0% |
0.009615385 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.0% |
0.010256410 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r17oppvekstfylke
|
Variable label:
|
Respondents home county at 15 years of age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r17oppvekstkom]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:6040] [Invalid:5981]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
669 |
11.1% |
0.11076159 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
547 |
9.1% |
0.09056291 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
356 |
5.9% |
0.05894040 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
344 |
5.7% |
0.05695364 |
| 30 |
Viken |
1218 |
20.2% |
0.20165563 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
396 |
6.6% |
0.06556291 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
475 |
7.9% |
0.07864238 |
| 42 |
Agder |
307 |
5.1% |
0.05082781 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
942 |
15.6% |
0.15596026 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
511 |
8.5% |
0.08460265 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
275 |
4.6% |
0.04552980 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5981 |
|
NA |
r18oppvekstfylke
|
Variable label:
|
Respondents home county at 15 years of age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r18oppvekstkom]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:752] [Invalid:11269]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
80 |
10.6% |
0.10638298 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
66 |
8.8% |
0.08776596 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
42 |
5.6% |
0.05585106 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
48 |
6.4% |
0.06382979 |
| 30 |
Viken |
139 |
18.5% |
0.18484043 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
71 |
9.4% |
0.09441489 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
60 |
8.0% |
0.07978723 |
| 42 |
Agder |
44 |
5.9% |
0.05851064 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
119 |
15.8% |
0.15824468 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
58 |
7.7% |
0.07712766 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
25 |
3.3% |
0.03324468 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11269 |
|
NA |
r22oppvekstfylke
|
Variable label:
|
Respondents home county at 15 years of age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r22oppvekstkom]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:1392] [Invalid:10629]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
138 |
9.9% |
0.09913793 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
122 |
8.8% |
0.08764368 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
87 |
6.2% |
0.06250000 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
87 |
6.2% |
0.06250000 |
| 30 |
Viken |
281 |
20.2% |
0.20186782 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
87 |
6.2% |
0.06250000 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
101 |
7.3% |
0.07255747 |
| 42 |
Agder |
83 |
6.0% |
0.05962644 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
233 |
16.7% |
0.16738506 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
99 |
7.1% |
0.07112069 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
74 |
5.3% |
0.05316092 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10629 |
|
NA |
r25_bgupc
|
Variable label:
|
Respondents home county at 15 years of age
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r25_bgupm]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:1334] [Invalid:10687]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
117 |
8.8% |
0.08770615 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
118 |
8.8% |
0.08845577 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
78 |
5.8% |
0.05847076 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
85 |
6.4% |
0.06371814 |
| 30 |
Viken |
287 |
21.5% |
0.21514243 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
108 |
8.1% |
0.08095952 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
113 |
8.5% |
0.08470765 |
| 42 |
Agder |
67 |
5.0% |
0.05022489 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
190 |
14.2% |
0.14242879 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
113 |
8.5% |
0.08470765 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
58 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10687 |
|
NA |
r22bk27_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status. [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
208 |
13.0% |
0.13032581 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
91 |
5.7% |
0.05701754 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
259 |
16.2% |
0.16228070 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
905 |
56.7% |
0.56704261 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
63 |
3.9% |
0.03947368 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
53 |
3.3% |
0.03320802 |
| 7 |
Other: |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.1% |
0.01065163 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r23bk27_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status. Click on the one that is most relevant [coded]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Click on the one that is most relevant
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
879 |
11.5% |
0.1151427823 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
338 |
4.4% |
0.0442756091 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
1144 |
15.0% |
0.1498559078 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
4464 |
58.5% |
0.5847524234 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
443 |
5.8% |
0.0580298664 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
315 |
4.1% |
0.0412627718 |
| 7 |
Other: |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0006549646 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
0.6% |
0.0060256746 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4387 |
|
NA |
r25_bgciv
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your marital status?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Check what fits the best
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
197 |
12.6% |
0.126282051 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
90 |
5.8% |
0.057692308 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
288 |
18.5% |
0.184615385 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
817 |
52.4% |
0.523717949 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
90 |
5.8% |
0.057692308 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
53 |
3.4% |
0.033974359 |
| 7 |
Other: |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001923077 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.4% |
0.014102564 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
w01_k28
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1335 |
94.3% |
0.94346290 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
59 |
4.2% |
0.04169611 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.5% |
0.01484099 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10606 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k28
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was
missing]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1415 |
94.3% |
0.94333333 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
70 |
4.7% |
0.04666667 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.0% |
0.01000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10521 |
|
NA |
r4k28
|
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
23 |
92.0% |
0.92 |
| 2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
2 |
8.0% |
0.08 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11996 |
|
NA |
r5k28
|
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
9 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12012 |
|
NA |
r8k28
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to
newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1297 |
94.7% |
0.947406866 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
65 |
4.7% |
0.047479912 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005113221 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10652 |
|
NA |
r11bk28
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
701 |
94.2% |
0.942204301 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
41 |
5.5% |
0.055107527 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002688172 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11277 |
|
NA |
r14bk28
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
734 |
94.7% |
0.94709677 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
37 |
4.8% |
0.04774194 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.5% |
0.00516129 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11246 |
|
NA |
r16bk28
|
Variable label:
|
Your citizenship
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1973 |
93.8% |
0.9381835473 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
129 |
6.1% |
0.0613409415 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0004755112 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r18bk28
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
803 |
94.8% |
0.948051948 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
39 |
4.6% |
0.046044864 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005903188 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11174 |
|
NA |
r22bk28
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1497 |
93.8% |
0.93796992 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
81 |
5.1% |
0.05075188 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.1% |
0.01127820 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r25_bgcit
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1454 |
93.2% |
0.93205128 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
83 |
5.3% |
0.05320513 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.5% |
0.01474359 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
w01_k29
|
Variable label:
|
Parents immigrated to Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
1284 |
90.7% |
0.907420495 |
| 2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
58 |
4.1% |
0.040989399 |
| 3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003533569 |
| 4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
24 |
1.7% |
0.016961131 |
| 5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
21 |
1.5% |
0.014840989 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.6% |
0.016254417 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10606 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k29
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was
missing]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
1371 |
91.3% |
0.912782956 |
| 2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
67 |
4.5% |
0.044607190 |
| 3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
7 |
0.5% |
0.004660453 |
| 4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
21 |
1.4% |
0.013981358 |
| 5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
19 |
1.3% |
0.012649800 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.1% |
0.011318242 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10519 |
|
NA |
r4k29
|
Variable label:
|
Mother or father immigrated to Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
22 |
81.5% |
0.81481481 |
| 2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
2 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
3 |
11.1% |
0.11111111 |
| 5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11994 |
|
NA |
r5k29
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
9 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
12012 |
|
NA |
r11bk29
|
Variable label:
|
Immigration background
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 3 or rekruttert = 4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
1777 |
91.8% |
0.918346253 |
| 2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
99 |
5.1% |
0.051162791 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001550388 |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
32 |
1.7% |
0.016537468 |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
19 |
1.0% |
0.009819121 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002583979 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10086 |
|
NA |
r14bk29
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or any of your parents immigrated to Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
690 |
89.0% |
0.890322581 |
| 2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
48 |
6.2% |
0.061935484 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002580645 |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
23 |
3.0% |
0.029677419 |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
8 |
1.0% |
0.010322581 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.5% |
0.005161290 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11246 |
|
NA |
r16bk29
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
1897 |
90.2% |
0.9020446981 |
| 2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
126 |
6.0% |
0.0599144080 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
7 |
0.3% |
0.0033285782 |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
39 |
1.9% |
0.0185449358 |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
32 |
1.5% |
0.0152163576 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009510223 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r18bk29
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
770 |
90.9% |
0.909090909 |
| 2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
45 |
5.3% |
0.053128689 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004722550 |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
17 |
2.0% |
0.020070838 |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007083825 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005903188 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11174 |
|
NA |
r22bk29
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
1433 |
89.8% |
0.897869674 |
| 2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
99 |
6.2% |
0.062030075 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002506266 |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
18 |
1.1% |
0.011278195 |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
25 |
1.6% |
0.015664160 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.1% |
0.010651629 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r25_bgimm
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
1362 |
87.3% |
0.873076923 |
| 2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
104 |
6.7% |
0.066666667 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006410256 |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
31 |
2.0% |
0.019871795 |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
28 |
1.8% |
0.017948718 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.6% |
0.016025641 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r20bkhelse
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
966 |
13.3% |
0.13337015 |
| 2 |
Very good |
2633 |
36.4% |
0.36352340 |
| 3 |
Good |
2556 |
35.3% |
0.35289245 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
879 |
12.1% |
0.12135855 |
| 5 |
Poor |
186 |
2.6% |
0.02567997 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.3% |
0.00317548 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4778 |
|
NA |
r22bkhelse
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
254 |
15.9% |
0.15914787 |
| 2 |
Very good |
607 |
38.0% |
0.38032581 |
| 3 |
Good |
474 |
29.7% |
0.29699248 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
176 |
11.0% |
0.11027569 |
| 5 |
Poor |
67 |
4.2% |
0.04197995 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.1% |
0.01127820 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r23bkhelse
|
Variable label:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
970 |
12.7% |
0.127063139 |
| 2 |
Very good |
2500 |
32.7% |
0.327482316 |
| 3 |
Good |
2705 |
35.4% |
0.354335866 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
1087 |
14.2% |
0.142389311 |
| 5 |
Poor |
321 |
4.2% |
0.042048729 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
0.7% |
0.006680639 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4387 |
|
NA |
r25_bghea
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] = 3 | 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
370 |
10.8% |
0.107746069 |
| 2 |
Very good |
1092 |
31.8% |
0.317996506 |
| 3 |
Good |
1288 |
37.5% |
0.375072801 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
515 |
15.0% |
0.149970879 |
| 5 |
Poor |
143 |
4.2% |
0.041642400 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.8% |
0.007571345 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8587 |
|
NA |
r22bk35
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
388 |
24.3% |
0.24310777 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
309 |
19.4% |
0.19360902 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
454 |
28.4% |
0.28446115 |
| 4 |
A village |
258 |
16.2% |
0.16165414 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
168 |
10.5% |
0.10526316 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.2% |
0.01190476 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r23bk35
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
1733 |
22.7% |
0.22701074 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
1634 |
21.4% |
0.21404244 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
2105 |
27.6% |
0.27574011 |
| 4 |
A village |
1218 |
16.0% |
0.15954938 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
896 |
11.7% |
0.11736966 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.6% |
0.00628766 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4387 |
|
NA |
r25_bgurb
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Posed if [r25_group] = 1 | 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
868 |
26.1% |
0.261052632 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
619 |
18.6% |
0.186165414 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
979 |
29.4% |
0.294436090 |
| 4 |
A village |
547 |
16.5% |
0.164511278 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
289 |
8.7% |
0.086917293 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.7% |
0.006917293 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8696 |
|
NA |
r23tdr19
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich
parts of the country to parts that are not so rich.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the
country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives
public services of the same quality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1193 |
13.1% |
0.131214254 |
| 2 |
Agree |
3221 |
35.4% |
0.354267488 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
2621 |
28.8% |
0.288275407 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1110 |
12.2% |
0.122085350 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
528 |
5.8% |
0.058073031 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
283 |
3.1% |
0.031126265 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
83 |
0.9% |
0.009128905 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
53 |
0.6% |
0.005829300 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r25_cpres
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich
parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that
everyone receives public services of the same quality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the
country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives
public services of the same quality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
254 |
14.4% |
0.143909348 |
| 2 |
Agree |
602 |
34.1% |
0.341076487 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
577 |
32.7% |
0.326912181 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
155 |
8.8% |
0.087818697 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
103 |
5.8% |
0.058356941 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
43 |
2.4% |
0.024362606 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
28 |
1.6% |
0.015864023 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001699717 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10256 |
|
NA |
r16k43_1_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections
this autumn? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections
this autumn?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondentene spurt. Rekkefølgen på svaralternativene er
randomisert. ]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
233 |
3.3% |
0.032895666 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1418 |
20.0% |
0.200197656 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
374 |
5.3% |
0.052802485 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
275 |
3.9% |
0.038825356 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
643 |
9.1% |
0.090780743 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
865 |
12.2% |
0.122123394 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
637 |
9.0% |
0.089933644 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1414 |
20.0% |
0.199632924 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
364 |
5.1% |
0.051390654 |
| 10 |
The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) |
155 |
2.2% |
0.021883383 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
10 |
0.1% |
0.001411831 |
| 12 |
A local party list |
136 |
1.9% |
0.019200904 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
53 |
0.7% |
0.007482705 |
| 14 |
Did not vote |
341 |
4.8% |
0.048143442 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
16 |
0.2% |
0.002258930 |
| 16 |
Other: |
127 |
1.8% |
0.017930256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
0.3% |
0.003106029 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4938 |
|
NA |
r16k43_2_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council
election this autumn? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council
election this autumn?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondentene spurt. Rekkefølgen på svaralternativene er
randomisert (men tilsvarer rekkefølgen til r16k43_1).]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
238 |
3.4% |
0.0336015813 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1404 |
19.8% |
0.1982210928 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
400 |
5.6% |
0.0564732458 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
251 |
3.5% |
0.0354369617 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
595 |
8.4% |
0.0840039531 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
919 |
13.0% |
0.1297472822 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
613 |
8.7% |
0.0865452492 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1321 |
18.7% |
0.1865028943 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
345 |
4.9% |
0.0487081745 |
| 10 |
The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) |
141 |
2.0% |
0.0199068191 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0001411831 |
| 12 |
A local party list |
38 |
0.5% |
0.0053649584 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
78 |
1.1% |
0.0110122829 |
| 14 |
Did not vote |
500 |
7.1% |
0.0705915572 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
52 |
0.7% |
0.0073415220 |
| 16 |
Other: |
134 |
1.9% |
0.0189185373 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
53 |
0.7% |
0.0074827051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4938 |
|
NA |
r22k3
|
Variable label:
|
Which party did you vote for in the parliamentary elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for in the parliamentary elections?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
336 |
3.6% |
0.036164030 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1813 |
19.5% |
0.195135077 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
663 |
7.1% |
0.071359380 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
441 |
4.7% |
0.047465289 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
968 |
10.4% |
0.104186847 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1004 |
10.8% |
0.108061565 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
473 |
5.1% |
0.050909482 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2130 |
22.9% |
0.229254117 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
588 |
6.3% |
0.063287052 |
| 10 |
Other: |
257 |
2.8% |
0.027661177 |
| 11 |
Did not vote |
213 |
2.3% |
0.022925412 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
334 |
3.6% |
0.035948768 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
44 |
0.5% |
0.004735766 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.3% |
0.002906038 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2730 |
|
NA |
r25_pcvot21
|
Variable label:
|
Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in
2021
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in
2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
45 |
2.9% |
0.028846154 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
297 |
19.0% |
0.190384615 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
92 |
5.9% |
0.058974359 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
78 |
5.0% |
0.050000000 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
116 |
7.4% |
0.074358974 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
164 |
10.5% |
0.105128205 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
99 |
6.3% |
0.063461538 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
378 |
24.2% |
0.242307692 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
109 |
7.0% |
0.069871795 |
| 10 |
Other: |
44 |
2.8% |
0.028205128 |
| 11 |
Did not vote |
44 |
2.8% |
0.028205128 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
79 |
5.1% |
0.050641026 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003846154 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.6% |
0.005769231 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r20tdr8_a_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler] [Added recoded values
from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
214 |
3.0% |
0.029545768 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1656 |
22.9% |
0.228634544 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
367 |
5.1% |
0.050669612 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
217 |
3.0% |
0.029959961 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
618 |
8.5% |
0.085323761 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1008 |
13.9% |
0.139168853 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
502 |
6.9% |
0.069308298 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1497 |
20.7% |
0.206682314 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
391 |
5.4% |
0.053983156 |
| 10 |
The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
65 |
0.9% |
0.008974182 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
12 |
0.2% |
0.001656772 |
| 12 |
A local list |
151 |
2.1% |
0.020847715 |
| 13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
127 |
1.8% |
0.017534171 |
| 14 |
Would not vote |
129 |
1.8% |
0.017810300 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
12 |
0.2% |
0.001656772 |
| 16 |
Other: |
229 |
3.2% |
0.031616733 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.7% |
0.006627088 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4778 |
|
NA |
r21tdr8a
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if municipal elections tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
44 |
3.1% |
0.030726257 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
344 |
24.0% |
0.240223464 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
87 |
6.1% |
0.060754190 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
43 |
3.0% |
0.030027933 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
116 |
8.1% |
0.081005587 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
165 |
11.5% |
0.115223464 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
108 |
7.5% |
0.075418994 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
297 |
20.7% |
0.207402235 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
98 |
6.8% |
0.068435754 |
| 10 |
The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004189944 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001396648 |
| 12 |
A local list |
25 |
1.7% |
0.017458101 |
| 13 |
Would not vote |
23 |
1.6% |
0.016061453 |
| 14 |
Would cast a blank vote |
19 |
1.3% |
0.013268156 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000698324 |
| 16 |
Other: |
52 |
3.6% |
0.036312849 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001396648 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10589 |
|
NA |
r20tdr8_b_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler] [Added recoded values
from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
200 |
2.8% |
0.027612868 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1580 |
21.8% |
0.218141654 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
369 |
5.1% |
0.050945741 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
201 |
2.8% |
0.027750932 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
660 |
9.1% |
0.091122463 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
1075 |
14.8% |
0.148419163 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
478 |
6.6% |
0.065994754 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1345 |
18.6% |
0.185696535 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
354 |
4.9% |
0.048874776 |
| 10 |
The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
60 |
0.8% |
0.008283860 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
14 |
0.2% |
0.001932901 |
| 12 |
A local list |
49 |
0.7% |
0.006765153 |
| 13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
184 |
2.5% |
0.025403838 |
| 14 |
Would not vote |
300 |
4.1% |
0.041419301 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
47 |
0.6% |
0.006489024 |
| 16 |
Other: |
244 |
3.4% |
0.033687698 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
1.1% |
0.011459340 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4778 |
|
NA |
r21tdr8b
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if county council elections tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections
were to take place tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
44 |
3.1% |
0.030726257 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
325 |
22.7% |
0.226955307 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
90 |
6.3% |
0.062849162 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
44 |
3.1% |
0.030726257 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
125 |
8.7% |
0.087290503 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
180 |
12.6% |
0.125698324 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
99 |
6.9% |
0.069134078 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
264 |
18.4% |
0.184357542 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
84 |
5.9% |
0.058659218 |
| 10 |
The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007681564 |
| 11 |
A joint party list |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 12 |
A local list |
14 |
1.0% |
0.009776536 |
| 13 |
Would not vote |
33 |
2.3% |
0.023044693 |
| 14 |
Would cast a blank vote |
57 |
4.0% |
0.039804469 |
| 15 |
Not entitled to vote |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002793296 |
| 16 |
Other: |
49 |
3.4% |
0.034217877 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.6% |
0.006284916 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10589 |
|
NA |
r23pk12
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
706 |
7.8% |
0.077650682 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
4304 |
47.3% |
0.473383194 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
2968 |
32.6% |
0.326440827 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
876 |
9.6% |
0.096348438 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
227 |
2.5% |
0.024967004 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.1% |
0.001209855 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk53
|
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
224 |
2.5% |
0.024637044 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
3232 |
35.5% |
0.355477343 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
3920 |
43.1% |
0.431148262 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
1357 |
14.9% |
0.149252090 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
313 |
3.4% |
0.034425869 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
0.5% |
0.005059393 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk54
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
556 |
6.1% |
0.061152662 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
3875 |
42.6% |
0.426198856 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
3474 |
38.2% |
0.382094149 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
890 |
9.8% |
0.097888253 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
253 |
2.8% |
0.027826661 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
0.5% |
0.004839419 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23cov_trust_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Confidence in the way national authorities are handling
and are prepared for the coronavirus pandemic.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have confidence in the way national authorities are handling and are
prepared to tackle the coronavirus pandemic.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
335 |
3.7% |
0.036845579 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
948 |
10.4% |
0.104267488 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1518 |
16.7% |
0.166959965 |
| 4 |
Agree |
5092 |
56.0% |
0.560052794 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
1187 |
13.1% |
0.130554333 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.1% |
0.001319842 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk15
|
Variable label:
|
Can most people be trusted, or one cannot be careful enough?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
56 |
0.6% |
0.006159261 |
| 1 |
1 |
48 |
0.5% |
0.005279366 |
| 2 |
2 |
125 |
1.4% |
0.013748350 |
| 3 |
3 |
253 |
2.8% |
0.027826661 |
| 4 |
4 |
293 |
3.2% |
0.032226133 |
| 5 |
5 |
706 |
7.8% |
0.077650682 |
| 6 |
6 |
730 |
8.0% |
0.080290365 |
| 7 |
7 |
1974 |
21.7% |
0.217113946 |
| 8 |
8 |
2544 |
28.0% |
0.279806423 |
| 9 |
9 |
1246 |
13.7% |
0.137043555 |
| 10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
1112 |
12.2% |
0.122305323 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.1% |
0.000549934 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pktilfreds1
|
Variable label:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
2366 |
26.0% |
0.2602287725 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
5457 |
60.0% |
0.6001979762 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1020 |
11.2% |
0.1121865376 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
203 |
2.2% |
0.0223273207 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
38 |
0.4% |
0.0041794985 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.1% |
0.0008798944 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk60
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The Government should work to reduce the income
differences.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income
differences in society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2592 |
28.5% |
0.285085790 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2604 |
28.6% |
0.286405631 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1941 |
21.3% |
0.213484382 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
848 |
9.3% |
0.093268808 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
528 |
5.8% |
0.058073031 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
393 |
4.3% |
0.043224813 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
138 |
1.5% |
0.015178179 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.5% |
0.005279366 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23bk33_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days. [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-14]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
100% furloughed by employer |
17 |
0.2% |
0.0018697756 |
| 2 |
Partially furloughed by employer |
19 |
0.2% |
0.0020897492 |
| 3 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
3907 |
43.0% |
0.4297184338 |
| 4 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
294 |
3.2% |
0.0323361197 |
| 5 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
275 |
3.0% |
0.0302463704 |
| 6 |
Self-employed |
365 |
4.0% |
0.0401451826 |
| 7 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
181 |
2.0% |
0.0199076111 |
| 8 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
50 |
0.5% |
0.0054993401 |
| 9 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
27 |
0.3% |
0.0029696436 |
| 10 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
507 |
5.6% |
0.0557633084 |
| 11 |
Retired |
3283 |
36.1% |
0.3610866696 |
| 12 |
In military service |
4 |
0.0% |
0.0004399472 |
| 13 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
57 |
0.6% |
0.0062692477 |
| 14 |
Other: |
58 |
0.6% |
0.0063792345 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.5% |
0.0052793665 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23bk21_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in? [coded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r23bk33 = 1, 2,3, 4, 5]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
531 |
11.9% |
0.119031607 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1449 |
32.5% |
0.324815064 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
296 |
6.6% |
0.066352836 |
| 4 |
Private business |
2135 |
47.9% |
0.478592244 |
| 5 |
Self-employed |
24 |
0.5% |
0.005379960 |
| 6 |
Other: |
23 |
0.5% |
0.005155795 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.000672495 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7560 |
|
NA |
r23tdr17
|
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in [region] compared to [region]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation in [region] with the rest of
Norway, do you consider the situation in [region] as better, worse or
the same?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Better |
1914 |
21.1% |
0.210514738 |
| 2 |
The same |
5689 |
62.6% |
0.625714914 |
| 3 |
Worse |
1405 |
15.5% |
0.154531456 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
84 |
0.9% |
0.009238891 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r25_pcecr
|
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in [r25_P2] compared to the rest of the country
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation [r25_P2] with the rest of Norway,
do you consider the situation [r25_P2] as being better, the same or
worse?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Better |
428 |
24.2% |
0.2424929 |
| 2 |
The same |
1024 |
58.0% |
0.5801700 |
| 3 |
Worse |
295 |
16.7% |
0.1671388 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.0% |
0.0101983 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10256 |
|
NA |
r22pkklasse
|
Variable label:
|
Which social class would you place yourself in?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups
or classes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it
be?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lower class |
24 |
1.5% |
0.015037594 |
| 2 |
Working class |
180 |
11.3% |
0.112781955 |
| 3 |
Lower middle class |
143 |
9.0% |
0.089598997 |
| 4 |
Middle class |
871 |
54.6% |
0.545739348 |
| 5 |
Upper middle class |
294 |
18.4% |
0.184210526 |
| 6 |
Upper class |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006265664 |
| 7 |
Don't know |
57 |
3.6% |
0.035714286 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.1% |
0.010651629 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r23pkklasse
|
Variable label:
|
Which social class would you place yourself in?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups
or classes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it
be?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lower class |
98 |
1.3% |
0.012837307 |
| 2 |
Working class |
931 |
12.2% |
0.121954414 |
| 3 |
Lower middle class |
859 |
11.3% |
0.112522924 |
| 4 |
Middle class |
4360 |
57.1% |
0.571129159 |
| 5 |
Upper middle class |
1273 |
16.7% |
0.166753995 |
| 6 |
Upper class |
33 |
0.4% |
0.004322767 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
80 |
1.0% |
0.010479434 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4387 |
|
NA |
r25_bgcla
|
Variable label:
|
Social class, personal placement.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups
or classes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it
be?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lower class |
18 |
1.2% |
0.011538462 |
| 2 |
Working class |
199 |
12.8% |
0.127564103 |
| 3 |
Lower middle class |
164 |
10.5% |
0.105128205 |
| 4 |
Middle class |
816 |
52.3% |
0.523076923 |
| 5 |
Upper middle class |
270 |
17.3% |
0.173076923 |
| 6 |
Upper class |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001923077 |
| 7 |
Do not know |
67 |
4.3% |
0.042948718 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.5% |
0.014743590 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r20pk1
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
1214 |
16.8% |
0.16761011 |
| 2 |
Interested |
3410 |
47.1% |
0.47079939 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
2110 |
29.1% |
0.29131575 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
419 |
5.8% |
0.05784896 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
60 |
0.8% |
0.00828386 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
0.4% |
0.00414193 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4778 |
|
NA |
r22pk1
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
239 |
15.0% |
0.149749373 |
| 2 |
Interested |
703 |
44.0% |
0.440476190 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
493 |
30.9% |
0.308897243 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
134 |
8.4% |
0.083959900 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009398496 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.8% |
0.007518797 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r25_pcpin
|
Variable label:
|
How interested are you in politics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
211 |
13.5% |
0.135256410 |
| 2 |
Interested |
682 |
43.7% |
0.437179487 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
490 |
31.4% |
0.314102564 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
142 |
9.1% |
0.091025641 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
31 |
2.0% |
0.019871795 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002564103 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r18pk8
|
Variable label:
|
Place yourself on the political left-wing/right-wing scale
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right
wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left
politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Left |
29 |
3.4% |
0.034238489 |
| 1 |
1 |
48 |
5.7% |
0.056670602 |
| 2 |
2 |
98 |
11.6% |
0.115702479 |
| 3 |
3 |
127 |
15.0% |
0.149940968 |
| 4 |
4 |
99 |
11.7% |
0.116883117 |
| 5 |
5 |
123 |
14.5% |
0.145218418 |
| 6 |
6 |
80 |
9.4% |
0.094451004 |
| 7 |
7 |
111 |
13.1% |
0.131050767 |
| 8 |
8 |
80 |
9.4% |
0.094451004 |
| 9 |
9 |
30 |
3.5% |
0.035419126 |
| 10 |
10 - Right |
15 |
1.8% |
0.017709563 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008264463 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11174 |
|
NA |
r20pk8
|
Variable label:
|
Your position on the political left-right scale
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People often talk about “left wing” and “right wing” politics. Below is
a scale where 0 represents those who are very much politically left
wing, while 10 represents those who are very much politically right
wing.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 18]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Left wing |
104 |
1.6% |
0.015953367 |
| 1 |
1 |
295 |
4.5% |
0.045252339 |
| 2 |
2 |
746 |
11.4% |
0.114434729 |
| 3 |
3 |
975 |
15.0% |
0.149562816 |
| 4 |
4 |
754 |
11.6% |
0.115661911 |
| 5 |
5 |
903 |
13.9% |
0.138518178 |
| 6 |
6 |
757 |
11.6% |
0.116122105 |
| 7 |
7 |
911 |
14.0% |
0.139745360 |
| 8 |
8 |
741 |
11.4% |
0.113667740 |
| 9 |
9 |
172 |
2.6% |
0.026384415 |
| 10 |
10 - Right wing |
99 |
1.5% |
0.015186378 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
62 |
1.0% |
0.009510661 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5502 |
|
NA |
r22pk8
|
Variable label:
|
0-10: Place yourself on left/right scale.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right
wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left
politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Left wing |
57 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
| 1 |
1 |
79 |
4.9% |
0.04949875 |
| 2 |
2 |
188 |
11.8% |
0.11779449 |
| 3 |
3 |
223 |
14.0% |
0.13972431 |
| 4 |
4 |
188 |
11.8% |
0.11779449 |
| 5 |
5 |
226 |
14.2% |
0.14160401 |
| 6 |
6 |
154 |
9.6% |
0.09649123 |
| 7 |
7 |
206 |
12.9% |
0.12907268 |
| 8 |
8 |
164 |
10.3% |
0.10275689 |
| 9 |
9 |
57 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
| 10 |
10 - Right wing |
35 |
2.2% |
0.02192982 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.2% |
0.01190476 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r14pk14
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated people like me do
not understand it.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not
understand what it’s about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
151 |
3.0% |
0.029990070 |
| 2 |
Agree |
501 |
10.0% |
0.099503476 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1468 |
29.2% |
0.291559086 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
487 |
9.7% |
0.096722939 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
677 |
13.4% |
0.134458788 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1294 |
25.7% |
0.257000993 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
445 |
8.8% |
0.088381331 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.2% |
0.002383317 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6986 |
|
NA |
r17pk14
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Sometimes politics is so complicated that it’s hard to
understand
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not
understand what it’s about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 16]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
89 |
4.5% |
0.045269583 |
| 2 |
Agree |
227 |
11.5% |
0.115462869 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
511 |
26.0% |
0.259918616 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
188 |
9.6% |
0.095625636 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
253 |
12.9% |
0.128687691 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
464 |
23.6% |
0.236012208 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
226 |
11.5% |
0.114954222 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.4% |
0.004069176 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10055 |
|
NA |
r20pk14
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Sometimes politics is so complicated that it’s hard to
understand
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not
understand what it’s about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
26 |
3.6% |
0.035911602 |
| 2 |
Agree |
50 |
6.9% |
0.069060773 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
175 |
24.2% |
0.241712707 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
54 |
7.5% |
0.074585635 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
98 |
13.5% |
0.135359116 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
214 |
29.6% |
0.295580110 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
103 |
14.2% |
0.142265193 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.6% |
0.005524862 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11297 |
|
NA |
r23pk14
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me
do not understand.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not
understand what it’s about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
77 |
5.3% |
0.052812071 |
| 2 |
Agree |
154 |
10.6% |
0.105624143 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
397 |
27.2% |
0.272290809 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
129 |
8.8% |
0.088477366 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
156 |
10.7% |
0.106995885 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
375 |
25.7% |
0.257201646 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
162 |
11.1% |
0.111111111 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.5% |
0.005486968 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10563 |
|
NA |
r14pk13
|
Variable label:
|
How much say in what the government does does the political system in
Norway allow people like you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like
you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
33 |
0.7% |
0.006554121 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
542 |
10.8% |
0.107646475 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
2219 |
44.1% |
0.440714995 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
1851 |
36.8% |
0.367626614 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
367 |
7.3% |
0.072889772 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.5% |
0.004568024 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6986 |
|
NA |
r17pk13
|
Variable label:
|
Whether the political system in Norway allow you to have a say
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like
you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 16]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
13 |
0.7% |
0.006612411 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
205 |
10.4% |
0.104272635 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
901 |
45.8% |
0.458290946 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
656 |
33.4% |
0.333672431 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
179 |
9.1% |
0.091047813 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.6% |
0.006103764 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10055 |
|
NA |
r20pk13
|
Variable label:
|
Whether the political system in Norway allows you to have a say
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like
you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
8 |
1.1% |
0.011049724 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
103 |
14.2% |
0.142265193 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
360 |
49.7% |
0.497237569 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
212 |
29.3% |
0.292817680 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
34 |
4.7% |
0.046961326 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
1.0% |
0.009668508 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11297 |
|
NA |
r23pk13
|
Variable label:
|
Whether the political system in Norway allows you to have a say
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you say the political system in Norway allows
people like you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 22]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
32 |
2.2% |
0.021947874 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
207 |
14.2% |
0.141975309 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
595 |
40.8% |
0.408093278 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
465 |
31.9% |
0.318930041 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
147 |
10.1% |
0.100823045 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.8% |
0.008230453 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10563 |
|
NA |
r25_pcsag
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
204 |
1.9% |
0.019006801 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2343 |
21.8% |
0.218298705 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
3483 |
32.5% |
0.324513184 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
3044 |
28.4% |
0.283611292 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
1648 |
15.4% |
0.153545141 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.1% |
0.001024877 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1288 |
|
NA |
r23pktilfreds4
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
1612 |
17.7% |
0.17729872 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
4656 |
51.2% |
0.51209855 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1820 |
20.0% |
0.20017598 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
704 |
7.7% |
0.07743071 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
201 |
2.2% |
0.02210735 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
99 |
1.1% |
0.01088869 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r25_pcsad
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
358 |
22.9% |
0.229487179 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
798 |
51.2% |
0.511538462 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
276 |
17.7% |
0.176923077 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
97 |
6.2% |
0.062179487 |
| 5 |
Very dissatisfied |
25 |
1.6% |
0.016025641 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003846154 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r23pk6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Christian
Democratic Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1510 |
16.6% |
0.166080070 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1838 |
20.2% |
0.202155741 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2217 |
24.4% |
0.243840739 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1913 |
21.0% |
0.210404751 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1159 |
12.7% |
0.127474703 |
| 6 |
Really like |
309 |
3.4% |
0.033985922 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
77 |
0.8% |
0.008468984 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
69 |
0.8% |
0.007589089 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Conservative
Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
433 |
4.8% |
0.047624285 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1187 |
13.1% |
0.130554333 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1586 |
17.4% |
0.174439067 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1265 |
13.9% |
0.139133304 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2327 |
25.6% |
0.255939287 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1742 |
19.2% |
0.191597008 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
490 |
5.4% |
0.053893533 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
62 |
0.7% |
0.006819182 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Progress
Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Progess Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2849 |
31.3% |
0.313352398 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1837 |
20.2% |
0.202045755 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1296 |
14.3% |
0.142542895 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
875 |
9.6% |
0.096238451 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1333 |
14.7% |
0.146612407 |
| 6 |
Really like |
641 |
7.1% |
0.070501540 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
206 |
2.3% |
0.022657281 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
0.6% |
0.006049274 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Liberal
Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
716 |
7.9% |
0.078750550 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1162 |
12.8% |
0.127804663 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1953 |
21.5% |
0.214804223 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2378 |
26.2% |
0.261548614 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2070 |
22.8% |
0.227672679 |
| 6 |
Really like |
623 |
6.9% |
0.068521777 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
116 |
1.3% |
0.012758469 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
0.8% |
0.008139023 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Socialist
Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Socialist Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
982 |
10.8% |
0.108007039 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1330 |
14.6% |
0.146282446 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1491 |
16.4% |
0.163990321 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1299 |
14.3% |
0.142872855 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1981 |
21.8% |
0.217883854 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1454 |
16.0% |
0.159920810 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
488 |
5.4% |
0.053673559 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.7% |
0.007369116 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Centre Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
750 |
8.2% |
0.082490101 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1261 |
13.9% |
0.138693357 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2147 |
23.6% |
0.236141663 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1834 |
20.2% |
0.201715794 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2171 |
23.9% |
0.238781346 |
| 6 |
Really like |
753 |
8.3% |
0.082820062 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
112 |
1.2% |
0.012318522 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
0.7% |
0.007039155 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Green Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2138 |
23.5% |
0.235151782 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1470 |
16.2% |
0.161680598 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1510 |
16.6% |
0.166080070 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1111 |
12.2% |
0.122195337 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1797 |
19.8% |
0.197646282 |
| 6 |
Really like |
805 |
8.9% |
0.088539375 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
202 |
2.2% |
0.022217334 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
0.6% |
0.006489221 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Labour Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
459 |
5.0% |
0.050483942 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
813 |
8.9% |
0.089419270 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1564 |
17.2% |
0.172019358 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1239 |
13.6% |
0.136273647 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2900 |
31.9% |
0.318961725 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1764 |
19.4% |
0.194016718 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
301 |
3.3% |
0.033106027 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
0.6% |
0.005719314 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The various Norwegian political parties: The Red Party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties: The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1610 |
17.7% |
0.177078751 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1300 |
14.3% |
0.142982842 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1293 |
14.2% |
0.142212934 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1296 |
14.3% |
0.142542895 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2071 |
22.8% |
0.227782666 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1040 |
11.4% |
0.114386274 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
421 |
4.6% |
0.046304443 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
61 |
0.7% |
0.006709195 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldk
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
224 |
14.5% |
0.14517174 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
304 |
19.7% |
0.19701879 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
352 |
22.8% |
0.22812703 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
392 |
25.4% |
0.25405055 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
203 |
13.2% |
0.13156189 |
| 6 |
Really like |
57 |
3.7% |
0.03694102 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
11 |
0.7% |
0.00712897 |
| 98 |
|
10478 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldh
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
63 |
4.1% |
0.04090909 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
177 |
11.5% |
0.11493506 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
281 |
18.2% |
0.18246753 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
218 |
14.2% |
0.14155844 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
393 |
25.5% |
0.25519481 |
| 6 |
Really like |
313 |
20.3% |
0.20324675 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
95 |
6.2% |
0.06168831 |
| 98 |
|
10481 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldf
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
419 |
27.1% |
0.27137306 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
335 |
21.7% |
0.21696891 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
240 |
15.5% |
0.15544041 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
166 |
10.8% |
0.10751295 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
225 |
14.6% |
0.14572539 |
| 6 |
Really like |
119 |
7.7% |
0.07707254 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
40 |
2.6% |
0.02590674 |
| 98 |
|
10477 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldv
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
95 |
6.2% |
0.06192960 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
185 |
12.1% |
0.12059974 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
301 |
19.6% |
0.19621904 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
455 |
29.7% |
0.29661017 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
353 |
23.0% |
0.23011734 |
| 6 |
Really like |
118 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
27 |
1.8% |
0.01760104 |
| 98 |
|
10487 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldsv
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Socialist Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
163 |
10.6% |
0.10563837 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
201 |
13.0% |
0.13026572 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
271 |
17.6% |
0.17563189 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
315 |
20.4% |
0.20414776 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
319 |
20.7% |
0.20674012 |
| 6 |
Really like |
212 |
13.7% |
0.13739469 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
62 |
4.0% |
0.04018146 |
| 98 |
|
10478 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldsp
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
211 |
13.7% |
0.136746598 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
286 |
18.5% |
0.185353208 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
348 |
22.6% |
0.225534673 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
351 |
22.7% |
0.227478937 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
251 |
16.3% |
0.162670123 |
| 6 |
Really like |
83 |
5.4% |
0.053791316 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
13 |
0.8% |
0.008425146 |
| 98 |
|
10478 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldm
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
294 |
19.0% |
0.1904145 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
223 |
14.4% |
0.1444301 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
256 |
16.6% |
0.1658031 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
238 |
15.4% |
0.1541451 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
332 |
21.5% |
0.2150259 |
| 6 |
Really like |
160 |
10.4% |
0.1036269 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
41 |
2.7% |
0.0265544 |
| 98 |
|
10477 |
|
NA |
r25_pclda
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
120 |
7.8% |
0.07772021 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
174 |
11.3% |
0.11269430 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
268 |
17.4% |
0.17357513 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
196 |
12.7% |
0.12694301 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
453 |
29.3% |
0.29339378 |
| 6 |
Really like |
304 |
19.7% |
0.19689119 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
29 |
1.9% |
0.01878238 |
| 98 |
|
10477 |
|
NA |
r25_pcldr
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
250 |
16.2% |
0.16233766 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
237 |
15.4% |
0.15389610 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
247 |
16.0% |
0.16038961 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
262 |
17.0% |
0.17012987 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
324 |
21.0% |
0.21038961 |
| 6 |
Really like |
172 |
11.2% |
0.11168831 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
48 |
3.1% |
0.03116883 |
| 98 |
|
10481 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_1
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her]
parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be
obedient.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
123 |
2.8% |
0.028288868 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
376 |
8.6% |
0.086476541 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
811 |
18.7% |
0.186522539 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1626 |
37.4% |
0.373965041 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1044 |
24.0% |
0.240110396 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
332 |
7.6% |
0.076356946 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
0.8% |
0.008279669 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_2
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do
what [his/her] religion requires.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
2147 |
49.4% |
0.493790248 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
916 |
21.1% |
0.210671573 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
586 |
13.5% |
0.134774609 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
409 |
9.4% |
0.094066237 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
188 |
4.3% |
0.043238270 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
72 |
1.7% |
0.016559338 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
0.7% |
0.006899724 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_3
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her].
[He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
13 |
0.3% |
0.002989880 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
51 |
1.2% |
0.011729531 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
281 |
6.5% |
0.064627415 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1680 |
38.6% |
0.386384545 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1639 |
37.7% |
0.376954922 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
655 |
15.1% |
0.150643974 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.7% |
0.006669733 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_4
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated
equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in
life.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
42 |
1.0% |
0.009659614 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
118 |
2.7% |
0.027138914 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
282 |
6.5% |
0.064857406 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1240 |
28.5% |
0.285188592 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1646 |
37.9% |
0.378564857 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
992 |
22.8% |
0.228150874 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.6% |
0.006439742 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_5
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand
things
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She]
likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
20 |
0.5% |
0.004599816 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
85 |
2.0% |
0.019549218 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
333 |
7.7% |
0.076586937 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1525 |
35.1% |
0.350735971 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1540 |
35.4% |
0.354185833 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
819 |
18.8% |
0.188362466 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.6% |
0.005979761 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_6
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new
experiences.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
415 |
9.5% |
0.09544618 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
942 |
21.7% |
0.21665133 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1503 |
34.6% |
0.34567617 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1085 |
25.0% |
0.24954002 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
312 |
7.2% |
0.07175713 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
66 |
1.5% |
0.01517939 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.6% |
0.00574977 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_7
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for
[him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
159 |
3.7% |
0.036568537 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
549 |
12.6% |
0.126264949 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1342 |
30.9% |
0.308647654 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1659 |
38.2% |
0.381554738 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
504 |
11.6% |
0.115915363 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
107 |
2.5% |
0.024609016 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.6% |
0.006439742 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_8
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress
other people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
468 |
10.8% |
0.107635695 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
993 |
22.8% |
0.228380865 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1446 |
33.3% |
0.332566697 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1071 |
24.6% |
0.246320147 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
281 |
6.5% |
0.064627415 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
63 |
1.4% |
0.014489420 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.6% |
0.005979761 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_9
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to
do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
454 |
10.4% |
0.104415823 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
880 |
20.2% |
0.202391904 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1452 |
33.4% |
0.333946642 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1175 |
27.0% |
0.270239190 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
319 |
7.3% |
0.073367065 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
39 |
0.9% |
0.008969641 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.7% |
0.006669733 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_10
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She]
really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with
personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text
corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is
randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
70 |
1.6% |
0.016099356 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
233 |
5.4% |
0.053587856 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
638 |
14.7% |
0.146734131 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1544 |
35.5% |
0.355105796 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1258 |
28.9% |
0.289328427 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
581 |
13.4% |
0.133624655 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.6% |
0.005519779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_1
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Respect for parents and for older people is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that [he/she] should always show respect for [his/her]
parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be
obedient.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
91 |
3.4% |
0.034197670 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
270 |
10.1% |
0.101465614 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
499 |
18.8% |
0.187523487 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1036 |
38.9% |
0.389327321 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
553 |
20.8% |
0.207816610 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
190 |
7.1% |
0.071401729 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
0.8% |
0.008267569 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9360 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_2
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Religious faith is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do
what [his/her] religion requires.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
1453 |
54.6% |
0.546035325 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
474 |
17.8% |
0.178128523 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
329 |
12.4% |
0.123637730 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
260 |
9.8% |
0.097707629 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
84 |
3.2% |
0.031567080 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
45 |
1.7% |
0.016910936 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.6% |
0.006012777 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9360 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_3
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To help people around you is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She]
wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001878993 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
36 |
1.4% |
0.013528749 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
138 |
5.2% |
0.051860203 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
998 |
37.5% |
0.375046975 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1009 |
37.9% |
0.379180759 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
458 |
17.2% |
0.172115746 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.6% |
0.006388576 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9360 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_4
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have all people in the world be treated equally is
important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated
equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in
life.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
16 |
0.6% |
0.006012777 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
68 |
2.6% |
0.025554303 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
139 |
5.2% |
0.052236002 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
710 |
26.7% |
0.266816986 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
991 |
37.2% |
0.372416385 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
721 |
27.1% |
0.270950770 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.6% |
0.006012777 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9360 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_5
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be interested in things and to be curious is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She]
likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
12 |
0.5% |
0.004509583 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
55 |
2.1% |
0.020668921 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
230 |
8.6% |
0.086433672 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
849 |
31.9% |
0.319052988 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
930 |
34.9% |
0.349492672 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
567 |
21.3% |
0.213077790 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.7% |
0.006764374 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9360 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_6
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take risks and look for new experiences is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He’s/she’s] always looking for new
experiences.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
287 |
10.8% |
0.107854190 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
616 |
23.1% |
0.231491920 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
899 |
33.8% |
0.337842916 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
624 |
23.4% |
0.234498309 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
180 |
6.8% |
0.067643743 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
40 |
1.5% |
0.015031943 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.6% |
0.005636979 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9360 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_7
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To seek out opportunites to have fun is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for
[him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
105 |
3.9% |
0.039458850 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
356 |
13.4% |
0.133784292 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
850 |
31.9% |
0.319428786 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
961 |
36.1% |
0.361142428 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
284 |
10.7% |
0.106726794 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
87 |
3.3% |
0.032694476 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.7% |
0.006764374 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9360 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_8
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be sucessful and to impress other people is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress
other people.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
324 |
12.2% |
0.121758737 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
583 |
21.9% |
0.219090567 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
951 |
35.7% |
0.357384442 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
557 |
20.9% |
0.209319805 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
189 |
7.1% |
0.071025930 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
42 |
1.6% |
0.015783540 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.6% |
0.005636979 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9360 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_9
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take the lead and tell others what to do is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to
do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
312 |
11.7% |
0.117249154 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
585 |
22.0% |
0.219842165 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
831 |
31.2% |
0.312288613 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
730 |
27.4% |
0.274332958 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
158 |
5.9% |
0.059376174 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
28 |
1.1% |
0.010522360 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.6% |
0.006388576 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9360 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_10
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have things tidy and clean is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She]
really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person
resembles or does not resemble you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the
gender of the respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
40 |
1.5% |
0.015031943 |
| 2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
147 |
5.5% |
0.055242390 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
385 |
14.5% |
0.144682450 |
| 4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
985 |
37.0% |
0.370161593 |
| 5 |
5 - Resembles me |
717 |
26.9% |
0.269447576 |
| 6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
370 |
13.9% |
0.139045472 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.6% |
0.006388576 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9360 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_1
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for his parents and
for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
35 |
4.8% |
0.04774898 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
147 |
20.1% |
0.20054570 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
295 |
40.2% |
0.40245566 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
140 |
19.1% |
0.19099591 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
72 |
9.8% |
0.09822647 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
35 |
4.8% |
0.04774898 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.2% |
0.01227831 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11288 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_2
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do
what [his/her] religion requires.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
7 |
1.0% |
0.009549795 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
20 |
2.7% |
0.027285130 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
65 |
8.9% |
0.088676671 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
106 |
14.5% |
0.144611187 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
148 |
20.2% |
0.201909959 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
378 |
51.6% |
0.515688950 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.2% |
0.012278308 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11288 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_3
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She]
wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
117 |
16.0% |
0.159618008 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
282 |
38.5% |
0.384720327 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
268 |
36.6% |
0.365620737 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
48 |
6.5% |
0.065484311 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
5 |
0.7% |
0.006821282 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001364256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.6% |
0.016371078 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11288 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_4
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated
equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in
life.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
201 |
27.4% |
0.274215553 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
274 |
37.4% |
0.373806276 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
203 |
27.7% |
0.276944065 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
37 |
5.0% |
0.050477490 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
8 |
1.1% |
0.010914052 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002728513 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
1.1% |
0.010914052 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11288 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_5
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand
things
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She]
likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
155 |
21.1% |
0.211459754 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
249 |
34.0% |
0.339699864 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
241 |
32.9% |
0.328785812 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
61 |
8.3% |
0.083219645 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
17 |
2.3% |
0.023192360 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001364256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.2% |
0.012278308 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11288 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_6
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new
experiences.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
17 |
2.3% |
0.02319236 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
56 |
7.6% |
0.07639836 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
178 |
24.3% |
0.24283765 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
256 |
34.9% |
0.34924966 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
152 |
20.7% |
0.20736698 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
64 |
8.7% |
0.08731241 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
1.4% |
0.01364256 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11288 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_7
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for him
to do things that give him pleasure.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
24 |
3.3% |
0.03274216 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
89 |
12.1% |
0.12141883 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
265 |
36.2% |
0.36152797 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
240 |
32.7% |
0.32742156 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
74 |
10.1% |
0.10095498 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
33 |
4.5% |
0.04502046 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
1.1% |
0.01091405 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11288 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_8
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress
other people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
9 |
1.2% |
0.01227831 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
61 |
8.3% |
0.08321965 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
187 |
25.5% |
0.25511596 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
254 |
34.7% |
0.34652115 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
148 |
20.2% |
0.20190996 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
65 |
8.9% |
0.08867667 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.2% |
0.01227831 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11288 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_9
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for him to take the lead and tell others what to do. He
wants people to do as he says.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004092769 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
44 |
6.0% |
0.060027285 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
212 |
28.9% |
0.289222374 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
236 |
32.2% |
0.321964529 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
146 |
19.9% |
0.199181446 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
83 |
11.3% |
0.113233288 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.2% |
0.012278308 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11288 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_10
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She]
really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
98 |
13.4% |
0.13369714 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
193 |
26.3% |
0.26330150 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
252 |
34.4% |
0.34379263 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
110 |
15.0% |
0.15006821 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
57 |
7.8% |
0.07776262 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
14 |
1.9% |
0.01909959 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.2% |
0.01227831 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11288 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_1
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her]
parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be
obedient.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
125 |
7.8% |
0.07832080 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
377 |
23.6% |
0.23621554 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
593 |
37.2% |
0.37155388 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
271 |
17.0% |
0.16979950 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
139 |
8.7% |
0.08709273 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
73 |
4.6% |
0.04573935 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.1% |
0.01127820 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_2
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do
what [his/her] religion requires.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
40 |
2.5% |
0.025062657 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
56 |
3.5% |
0.035087719 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
131 |
8.2% |
0.082080201 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
177 |
11.1% |
0.110902256 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
338 |
21.2% |
0.211779449 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
839 |
52.6% |
0.525689223 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009398496 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_3
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her].
[He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
337 |
21.1% |
0.211152882 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
612 |
38.3% |
0.383458647 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
529 |
33.1% |
0.331453634 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
82 |
5.1% |
0.051378446 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009398496 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001879699 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.1% |
0.011278195 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_4
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated
equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in
life.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
471 |
29.5% |
0.29511278 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
565 |
35.4% |
0.35401003 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
397 |
24.9% |
0.24874687 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
100 |
6.3% |
0.06265664 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
30 |
1.9% |
0.01879699 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
16 |
1.0% |
0.01002506 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.1% |
0.01065163 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_5
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand
things
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She]
likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
334 |
20.9% |
0.209273183 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
543 |
34.0% |
0.340225564 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
546 |
34.2% |
0.342105263 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
128 |
8.0% |
0.080200501 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
20 |
1.3% |
0.012531328 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003759398 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.2% |
0.011904762 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_6
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new
experiences.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
34 |
2.1% |
0.02130326 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
128 |
8.0% |
0.08020050 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
426 |
26.7% |
0.26691729 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
516 |
32.3% |
0.32330827 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
317 |
19.9% |
0.19862155 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
153 |
9.6% |
0.09586466 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.4% |
0.01378446 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_7
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for
[him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
68 |
4.3% |
0.04260652 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
208 |
13.0% |
0.13032581 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
552 |
34.6% |
0.34586466 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
481 |
30.1% |
0.30137845 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
202 |
12.7% |
0.12656642 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
69 |
4.3% |
0.04323308 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.0% |
0.01002506 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_8
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress
other people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
44 |
2.8% |
0.02756892 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
116 |
7.3% |
0.07268170 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
410 |
25.7% |
0.25689223 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
521 |
32.6% |
0.32644110 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
309 |
19.4% |
0.19360902 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
180 |
11.3% |
0.11278195 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.0% |
0.01002506 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_9
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to
do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009398496 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
83 |
5.2% |
0.052005013 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
366 |
22.9% |
0.229323308 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
492 |
30.8% |
0.308270677 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
416 |
26.1% |
0.260651629 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
206 |
12.9% |
0.129072682 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.1% |
0.011278195 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r22bktivi_10
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She]
really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
261 |
16.4% |
0.163533835 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
482 |
30.2% |
0.302005013 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
510 |
32.0% |
0.319548872 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
219 |
13.7% |
0.137218045 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
90 |
5.6% |
0.056390977 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
19 |
1.2% |
0.011904762 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009398496 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_1
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Respect for parents and for older people is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that [he/she] should always show respect for [him/her]
parents and for older people. It’s important to [his/hers] to be
obedient.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
128 |
8.2% |
0.08205128 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
342 |
21.9% |
0.21923077 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
556 |
35.6% |
0.35641026 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
304 |
19.5% |
0.19487179 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
155 |
9.9% |
0.09935897 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
55 |
3.5% |
0.03525641 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.3% |
0.01282051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_2
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Religious faith is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do
what [him/her] religion requires.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
27 |
1.7% |
0.01730769 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
45 |
2.9% |
0.02884615 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
128 |
8.2% |
0.08205128 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
207 |
13.3% |
0.13269231 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
299 |
19.2% |
0.19166667 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
834 |
53.5% |
0.53461538 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.3% |
0.01282051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_3
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To help people around you is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She]
wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
314 |
20.1% |
0.201282051 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
565 |
36.2% |
0.362179487 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
566 |
36.3% |
0.362820513 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
84 |
5.4% |
0.053846154 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006410256 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001923077 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.2% |
0.011538462 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_4
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have all people in the world be treated equally is
important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated
equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in
life.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
418 |
26.8% |
0.267948718 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
570 |
36.5% |
0.365384615 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
421 |
27.0% |
0.269871795 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
80 |
5.1% |
0.051282051 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
42 |
2.7% |
0.026923077 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006410256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.2% |
0.012179487 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_5
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be interested in things and to be curious is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She]
likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
333 |
21.3% |
0.213461538 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
523 |
33.5% |
0.335256410 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
512 |
32.8% |
0.328205128 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
139 |
8.9% |
0.089102564 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
28 |
1.8% |
0.017948718 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
5 |
0.3% |
0.003205128 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.3% |
0.012820513 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_6
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take risks and look for new experiences is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new
experiences.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
35 |
2.2% |
0.02243590 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
134 |
8.6% |
0.08589744 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
358 |
22.9% |
0.22948718 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
544 |
34.9% |
0.34871795 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
330 |
21.2% |
0.21153846 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
139 |
8.9% |
0.08910256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.3% |
0.01282051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_7
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To seek out opportunites to have fun is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for
[his/hers] to do things that give [his/hers] pleasure.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
66 |
4.2% |
0.04230769 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
213 |
13.7% |
0.13653846 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
597 |
38.3% |
0.38269231 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
441 |
28.3% |
0.28269231 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
175 |
11.2% |
0.11217949 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
49 |
3.1% |
0.03141026 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.2% |
0.01217949 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_8
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be sucessful and to impress other people is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress
other people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
35 |
2.2% |
0.02243590 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
141 |
9.0% |
0.09038462 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
444 |
28.5% |
0.28461538 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
496 |
31.8% |
0.31794872 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
290 |
18.6% |
0.18589744 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
133 |
8.5% |
0.08525641 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.3% |
0.01346154 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_9
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take the lead and tell others what to do is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to
do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
18 |
1.2% |
0.01153846 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
94 |
6.0% |
0.06025641 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
391 |
25.1% |
0.25064103 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
493 |
31.6% |
0.31602564 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
354 |
22.7% |
0.22692308 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
190 |
12.2% |
0.12179487 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.3% |
0.01282051 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r25_bgtiv_10
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have things tidy and clean is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She]
really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Wording dependent on respondents gender]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
236 |
15.1% |
0.15128205 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
450 |
28.8% |
0.28846154 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
544 |
34.9% |
0.34871795 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
212 |
13.6% |
0.13589744 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
75 |
4.8% |
0.04807692 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
22 |
1.4% |
0.01410256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.3% |
0.01346154 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_1
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Reserved.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is reserved
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
872 |
17.7% |
0.17748830 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1174 |
23.9% |
0.23895787 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
788 |
16.0% |
0.16039080 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1681 |
34.2% |
0.34215347 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
289 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
109 |
2.2% |
0.02218604 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7108 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_2
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Generally trusting.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is generally trusting
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
97 |
2.0% |
0.01974354 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
400 |
8.1% |
0.08141665 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
576 |
11.7% |
0.11723998 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
2370 |
48.2% |
0.48239365 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
1386 |
28.2% |
0.28210869 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
84 |
1.7% |
0.01709750 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7108 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_3
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Tendency to be lazy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… tend to be lazy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
1647 |
33.5% |
0.33523306 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1365 |
27.8% |
0.27783432 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
795 |
16.2% |
0.16181559 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
870 |
17.7% |
0.17708121 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
146 |
3.0% |
0.02971708 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
1.8% |
0.01831875 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7108 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_4
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Relaxed, handles stress well.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is relaxed, handles stress well
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
191 |
3.9% |
0.03887645 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
923 |
18.8% |
0.18786892 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
809 |
16.5% |
0.16466517 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
1997 |
40.6% |
0.40647262 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
906 |
18.4% |
0.18440871 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
1.8% |
0.01770812 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7108 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_5
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Few artistic interests.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… has few artistic interests
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
1439 |
29.3% |
0.29289640 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1552 |
31.6% |
0.31589660 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
755 |
15.4% |
0.15367393 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
852 |
17.3% |
0.17341746 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
227 |
4.6% |
0.04620395 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
88 |
1.8% |
0.01791166 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7108 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_6
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Outgoing, sociable.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is outgoing, sociable
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
205 |
4.2% |
0.04172603 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
782 |
15.9% |
0.15916955 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
782 |
15.9% |
0.15916955 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
1830 |
37.2% |
0.37248117 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
1234 |
25.1% |
0.25117036 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
80 |
1.6% |
0.01628333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7108 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_7
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Tends to find fault with others.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… tends to find fault with others
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
807 |
16.4% |
0.16425809 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1469 |
29.9% |
0.29900265 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1379 |
28.1% |
0.28068390 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
1084 |
22.1% |
0.22063912 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
98 |
2.0% |
0.01994708 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
76 |
1.5% |
0.01546916 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7108 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_8
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Does a thorough job.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… do a thorough job
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
72 |
1.5% |
0.01465500 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
96 |
2.0% |
0.01954000 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
446 |
9.1% |
0.09077956 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
2078 |
42.3% |
0.42295950 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
2146 |
43.7% |
0.43680033 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
1.5% |
0.01526562 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7108 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_9
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Easily nervous.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… get nervous easily
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely disagree |
1488 |
30.3% |
0.30286994 |
| 2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1458 |
29.7% |
0.29676369 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
856 |
17.4% |
0.17423163 |
| 4 |
Agree somewhat |
843 |
17.2% |
0.17158559 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
186 |
3.8% |
0.03785874 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
82 |
1.7% |
0.01669041 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7108 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_10
|
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Active imagination.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
|
Literal question:
|
… has an active imagination
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
285 |
5.8% |
0.05800936 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
690 |
14.0% |
0.14044372 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1267 |
25.8% |
0.25788724 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1654 |
33.7% |
0.33665785 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
939 |
19.1% |
0.19112559 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
78 |
1.6% |
0.01587625 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7108 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_1
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Reserved
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…is reserved
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
408 |
19.4% |
0.19400856 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
516 |
24.5% |
0.24536377 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
341 |
16.2% |
0.16214931 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
649 |
30.9% |
0.30860675 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
135 |
6.4% |
0.06419401 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
2.6% |
0.02567760 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_2
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Generally trusting
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…is generally trusting
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
61 |
2.9% |
0.02900618 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
176 |
8.4% |
0.08368997 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
228 |
10.8% |
0.10841655 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
962 |
45.7% |
0.45744175 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
647 |
30.8% |
0.30765573 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01378982 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_3
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Tends to be lazy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…tends to be lazy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
796 |
37.9% |
0.37850689 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
541 |
25.7% |
0.25725155 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
319 |
15.2% |
0.15168806 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
331 |
15.7% |
0.15739420 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
81 |
3.9% |
0.03851641 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.7% |
0.01664289 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_4
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Relaxed, handles stress well
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is relaxed, handles stress well
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
75 |
3.6% |
0.03566334 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
375 |
17.8% |
0.17831669 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
324 |
15.4% |
0.15406562 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
848 |
40.3% |
0.40323348 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
451 |
21.4% |
0.21445554 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.4% |
0.01426534 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_5
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Has few artistic interests
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… has few artistic interests
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
614 |
29.2% |
0.29196386 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
634 |
30.1% |
0.30147408 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
335 |
15.9% |
0.15929624 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
358 |
17.0% |
0.17023300 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
130 |
6.2% |
0.06181645 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.5% |
0.01521636 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_6
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Outgoing, sociable
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is outgoing, sociable
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
90 |
4.3% |
0.042796006 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
299 |
14.2% |
0.142177841 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
345 |
16.4% |
0.164051355 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
750 |
35.7% |
0.356633381 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
598 |
28.4% |
0.284355682 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.0% |
0.009985735 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_7
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Tends to find fault with others
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… tends to find fault with others
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
374 |
17.8% |
0.17784118 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
623 |
29.6% |
0.29624346 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
617 |
29.3% |
0.29339039 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
398 |
18.9% |
0.18925345 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
60 |
2.9% |
0.02853067 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.5% |
0.01474085 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_8
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Does a thorough job
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… does a thorough job
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
33 |
1.6% |
0.01569187 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
34 |
1.6% |
0.01616738 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
150 |
7.1% |
0.07132668 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
799 |
38.0% |
0.37993343 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
1058 |
50.3% |
0.50309082 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01378982 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_9
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Get nervous easily
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… get nervous easily
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
655 |
31.1% |
0.31145982 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
588 |
28.0% |
0.27960057 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
369 |
17.5% |
0.17546362 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
388 |
18.4% |
0.18449834 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
73 |
3.5% |
0.03471232 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.4% |
0.01426534 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_10
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Has an active imagination
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… has an active imagination
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
170 |
8.1% |
0.08083690 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
268 |
12.7% |
0.12743699 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
508 |
24.2% |
0.24155968 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
705 |
33.5% |
0.33523538 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
419 |
19.9% |
0.19923918 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.6% |
0.01569187 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Ideally some groups in society should be on top and others on
the bottom
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
An ideal society requires some groups to be on top and others to be on
the bottom
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
1374 |
32.1% |
0.321028037 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
799 |
18.7% |
0.186682243 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
558 |
13.0% |
0.130373832 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
546 |
12.8% |
0.127570093 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
531 |
12.4% |
0.124065421 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
368 |
8.6% |
0.085981308 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
78 |
1.8% |
0.018224299 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.6% |
0.006074766 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7741 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_2
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
2603 |
60.8% |
0.608177570 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
503 |
11.8% |
0.117523364 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
259 |
6.1% |
0.060514019 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
453 |
10.6% |
0.105841121 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
285 |
6.7% |
0.066588785 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
126 |
2.9% |
0.029439252 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
25 |
0.6% |
0.005841121 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.6% |
0.006074766 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7741 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_3
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: No one group should dominate in society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
No one group should dominate in society.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
327 |
7.6% |
0.076401869 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
227 |
5.3% |
0.053037383 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
266 |
6.2% |
0.062149533 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
438 |
10.2% |
0.102336449 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
379 |
8.9% |
0.088551402 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
787 |
18.4% |
0.183878505 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
1828 |
42.7% |
0.427102804 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.7% |
0.006542056 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7741 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_4
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the
top
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
180 |
4.2% |
0.042056075 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
330 |
7.7% |
0.077102804 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
425 |
9.9% |
0.099299065 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
598 |
14.0% |
0.139719626 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
454 |
10.6% |
0.106074766 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
919 |
21.5% |
0.214719626 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
1333 |
31.1% |
0.311448598 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
1.0% |
0.009579439 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7741 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_5
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Equality between groups should not be our main goal
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Equality between groups should not be our main goal.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
914 |
21.4% |
0.21355140 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
883 |
20.6% |
0.20630841 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
485 |
11.3% |
0.11331776 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
707 |
16.5% |
0.16518692 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
609 |
14.2% |
0.14228972 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
431 |
10.1% |
0.10070093 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
212 |
5.0% |
0.04953271 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.9% |
0.00911215 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7741 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_6
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: It is unjust to try to make groups equal
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
1005 |
23.5% |
0.23481308 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
775 |
18.1% |
0.18107477 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
476 |
11.1% |
0.11121495 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
876 |
20.5% |
0.20467290 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
566 |
13.2% |
0.13224299 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
381 |
8.9% |
0.08901869 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
145 |
3.4% |
0.03387850 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
1.3% |
0.01308411 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7741 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_7
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: We should equalize conditions for different groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
31 |
0.7% |
0.007242991 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
114 |
2.7% |
0.026635514 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
249 |
5.8% |
0.058177570 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
410 |
9.6% |
0.095794393 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
806 |
18.8% |
0.188317757 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
1037 |
24.2% |
0.242289720 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
1600 |
37.4% |
0.373831776 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.8% |
0.007710280 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7741 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_8
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: We should give all groups an equal chance to succeed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should work to give all groups an equal chance to succeed.
|
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is
usually the best.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
14 |
0.3% |
0.003271028 |
| 2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
15 |
0.4% |
0.003504673 |
| 3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
37 |
0.9% |
0.008644860 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
176 |
4.1% |
0.041121495 |
| 5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
389 |
9.1% |
0.090887850 |
| 6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
824 |
19.3% |
0.192523364 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
2800 |
65.4% |
0.654205607 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.6% |
0.005841121 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7741 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: An ideal society requires some groups to
be on top and others to be on the bottom
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
An ideal society requires some groups to be on top and others to be on
the bottom
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
1758 |
37.2% |
0.37214225 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
805 |
17.0% |
0.17040644 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
516 |
10.9% |
0.10922947 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
650 |
13.8% |
0.13759526 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
526 |
11.1% |
0.11134632 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
335 |
7.1% |
0.07091448 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
79 |
1.7% |
0.01672312 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
1.2% |
0.01164268 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7297 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_2
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: Some groups of people are simply inferior
to other groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
2803 |
59.3% |
0.59335309 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
499 |
10.6% |
0.10563082 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
256 |
5.4% |
0.05419136 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
580 |
12.3% |
0.12277731 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
288 |
6.1% |
0.06096528 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
170 |
3.6% |
0.03598645 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
70 |
1.5% |
0.01481795 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
1.2% |
0.01227773 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7297 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_3
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: No one group should dominate in society.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
No one group should dominate in society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
166 |
3.5% |
0.03513971 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
186 |
3.9% |
0.03937341 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
209 |
4.4% |
0.04424217 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
477 |
10.1% |
0.10097375 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
488 |
10.3% |
0.10330229 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
991 |
21.0% |
0.20977985 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
2157 |
45.7% |
0.45660457 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
1.1% |
0.01058425 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7297 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_4
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: Groups at the bottom are just as deserving
as groups at the top.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
186 |
3.9% |
0.03937341 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
323 |
6.8% |
0.06837426 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
446 |
9.4% |
0.09441152 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
640 |
13.5% |
0.13547841 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
538 |
11.4% |
0.11388654 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
1035 |
21.9% |
0.21909399 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
1497 |
31.7% |
0.31689246 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
1.2% |
0.01248942 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7297 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_5
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: Equality between groups should not be our
main goal.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Equality between groups should not be our main goal.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
934 |
19.8% |
0.19771380 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
978 |
20.7% |
0.20702794 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
535 |
11.3% |
0.11325148 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
847 |
17.9% |
0.17929721 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
622 |
13.2% |
0.13166808 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
482 |
10.2% |
0.10203218 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
269 |
5.7% |
0.05694327 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01206605 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7297 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_6
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
1066 |
22.6% |
0.22565622 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
844 |
17.9% |
0.17866215 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
522 |
11.0% |
0.11049958 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
1054 |
22.3% |
0.22311600 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
556 |
11.8% |
0.11769687 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
409 |
8.7% |
0.08657917 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
208 |
4.4% |
0.04403048 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
65 |
1.4% |
0.01375953 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7297 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_7
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: We should do what we can to equalize
conditions for different groups.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
40 |
0.8% |
0.008467401 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
131 |
2.8% |
0.027730737 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
181 |
3.8% |
0.038314987 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
477 |
10.1% |
0.100973751 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
789 |
16.7% |
0.167019475 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
1148 |
24.3% |
0.243014395 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
1904 |
40.3% |
0.403048264 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
1.1% |
0.011430991 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7297 |
|
NA |
r23sdo7_8
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: We should work to give all groups an equal
chance to succeed.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should work to give all groups an equal chance to succeed.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 14, 16, 18, 22]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
27 |
0.6% |
0.005715495 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
16 |
0.3% |
0.003386960 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
47 |
1.0% |
0.009949196 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
211 |
4.5% |
0.044665538 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
420 |
8.9% |
0.088907705 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
973 |
20.6% |
0.205969517 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
2983 |
63.1% |
0.631456393 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
47 |
1.0% |
0.009949196 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7297 |
|
NA |
r25_bgchi
|
Variable label:
|
Living with children under 16 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you,
and if so, how many?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
None |
1219 |
78.1% |
0.7814102564 |
| 1 |
1 |
136 |
8.7% |
0.0871794872 |
| 2 |
2 |
130 |
8.3% |
0.0833333333 |
| 3 |
3 |
42 |
2.7% |
0.0269230769 |
| 4 |
4 |
4 |
0.3% |
0.0025641026 |
| 5 |
5 |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000000 |
| 6 |
6 or more |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006410256 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.8% |
0.0179487179 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r11bk40_recode
|
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Recoded from source variable r11bk40]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
2831 |
65.1% |
0.651103956 |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
48 |
1.1% |
0.011039558 |
| 3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
148 |
3.4% |
0.034038638 |
| 4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
27 |
0.6% |
0.006209752 |
| 5 |
Islam |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001839926 |
| 6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
1261 |
29.0% |
0.290018399 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
0.6% |
0.005749770 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
r14bk40_recode
|
Variable label:
|
Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
[Recoded from source variable r14bk40]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
493 |
63.6% |
0.636129032 |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
10 |
1.3% |
0.012903226 |
| 3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
34 |
4.4% |
0.043870968 |
| 4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001290323 |
| 5 |
Islam |
5 |
0.6% |
0.006451613 |
| 6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
227 |
29.3% |
0.292903226 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.6% |
0.006451613 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11246 |
|
NA |
r16bk40_recode
|
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. Recoded from source variable r16bk40]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
1318 |
62.7% |
0.6267237280 |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
25 |
1.2% |
0.0118877794 |
| 3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
81 |
3.9% |
0.0385164051 |
| 4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
13 |
0.6% |
0.0061816453 |
| 5 |
Islam |
11 |
0.5% |
0.0052306229 |
| 6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities |
653 |
31.1% |
0.3105087970 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009510223 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r18bk40_recode
|
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Recoded from source variable r18bk40. Asked if r18group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
526 |
62.1% |
0.621015348 |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005903188 |
| 3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
36 |
4.3% |
0.042502952 |
| 4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004722550 |
| 5 |
Islam |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007083825 |
| 6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities |
264 |
31.2% |
0.311688312 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007083825 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11174 |
|
NA |
r22bk40_recode
|
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Recoded from source variable r22bk40. Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
1002 |
62.8% |
0.627819549 |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
14 |
0.9% |
0.008771930 |
| 3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
62 |
3.9% |
0.038847118 |
| 4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
17 |
1.1% |
0.010651629 |
| 5 |
Islam |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006265664 |
| 6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities |
468 |
29.3% |
0.293233083 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.4% |
0.014411028 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r25_bgrelrecode
|
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [Recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
918 |
58.8% |
0.588461538 |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
18 |
1.2% |
0.011538462 |
| 3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
65 |
4.2% |
0.041666667 |
| 4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
12 |
0.8% |
0.007692308 |
| 5 |
Islam |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006410256 |
| 6 |
Do not belong to any religion or religious denominations |
514 |
32.9% |
0.329487179 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.5% |
0.014743590 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r11bk41
|
Variable label:
|
Attends religious meetings
|
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often
would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
5 |
0.1% |
0.001149954 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
62 |
1.4% |
0.014259430 |
| 3 |
Once a week |
110 |
2.5% |
0.025298988 |
| 4 |
At least once a month |
204 |
4.7% |
0.046918123 |
| 5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
759 |
17.5% |
0.174563017 |
| 6 |
Less frequently |
937 |
21.6% |
0.215501380 |
| 7 |
Never |
2245 |
51.6% |
0.516329347 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.6% |
0.005979761 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
r14bk41
|
Variable label:
|
How often attend religious meetings, aside from special occasions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often
would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:2-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
11 |
1.4% |
0.014193548 |
| 3 |
Once a week |
29 |
3.7% |
0.037419355 |
| 4 |
At least once a month |
55 |
7.1% |
0.070967742 |
| 5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
131 |
16.9% |
0.169032258 |
| 6 |
Less frequently |
174 |
22.5% |
0.224516129 |
| 7 |
Never |
369 |
47.6% |
0.476129032 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.8% |
0.007741935 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11246 |
|
NA |
r16bk41
|
Variable label:
|
How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12
months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often
have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:2-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
34 |
1.6% |
0.016167380 |
| 3 |
Once a week |
38 |
1.8% |
0.018069425 |
| 4 |
Once or a few times a month |
68 |
3.2% |
0.032334760 |
| 5 |
Several times a year |
234 |
11.1% |
0.111269615 |
| 6 |
Once a year |
290 |
13.8% |
0.137898241 |
| 7 |
Less than once a year |
340 |
16.2% |
0.161673799 |
| 8 |
Never |
1094 |
52.0% |
0.520209225 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002377556 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9918 |
|
NA |
r18bk41
|
Variable label:
|
How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12
months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often
have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:2-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008264463 |
| 3 |
Once a week |
19 |
2.2% |
0.022432113 |
| 4 |
Once or a few times a month |
34 |
4.0% |
0.040141677 |
| 5 |
Several times a year |
79 |
9.3% |
0.093270366 |
| 6 |
Once a year |
128 |
15.1% |
0.151121606 |
| 7 |
Less than once a year |
129 |
15.2% |
0.152302243 |
| 8 |
Never |
445 |
52.5% |
0.525383707 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007083825 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11174 |
|
NA |
r22bk41
|
Variable label:
|
Aside from weddings and funerals, how often do you attend religious
meetings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often
would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r22group = 7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006265664 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
14 |
0.9% |
0.0087719298 |
| 3 |
Once a week |
29 |
1.8% |
0.0181704261 |
| 4 |
Once or a few times a month |
55 |
3.4% |
0.0344611529 |
| 5 |
Several times a year |
126 |
7.9% |
0.0789473684 |
| 6 |
Once a year |
199 |
12.5% |
0.1246867168 |
| 7 |
Less than once a year |
298 |
18.7% |
0.1867167920 |
| 8 |
Never |
856 |
53.6% |
0.5363408521 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.1% |
0.0112781955 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10425 |
|
NA |
r25_bgrem
|
Variable label:
|
How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12
months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often
have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r25_group = 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006410256 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
17 |
1.1% |
0.0108974359 |
| 3 |
Once a week |
24 |
1.5% |
0.0153846154 |
| 4 |
Once or a few times a month |
51 |
3.3% |
0.0326923077 |
| 5 |
Several times a year |
133 |
8.5% |
0.0852564103 |
| 6 |
Once a year |
192 |
12.3% |
0.1230769231 |
| 7 |
Less than once a year |
265 |
17.0% |
0.1698717949 |
| 8 |
Never |
853 |
54.7% |
0.5467948718 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.5% |
0.0153846154 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10461 |
|
NA |
r23pkmeme21
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted
sexual attention?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own
responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
102 |
1.1% |
0.011218654 |
| 2 |
Agree |
272 |
3.0% |
0.029916410 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1088 |
12.0% |
0.119665640 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
857 |
9.4% |
0.094258689 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
963 |
10.6% |
0.105917290 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2595 |
28.5% |
0.285415750 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3160 |
34.8% |
0.347558293 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
0.6% |
0.006049274 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pkby2
|
Variable label:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has your local environment become over the
past couple of years?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past
couple of years.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much safer |
92 |
1.0% |
0.010118786 |
| 2 |
Somewhat safer |
538 |
5.9% |
0.059172899 |
| 3 |
No change in safety |
6587 |
72.4% |
0.724483062 |
| 4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
1641 |
18.0% |
0.180488341 |
| 5 |
Much more unsafe |
182 |
2.0% |
0.020017598 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
0.6% |
0.005719314 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pkby3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
237 |
2.6% |
0.026066872 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
1085 |
11.9% |
0.119335680 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
3994 |
43.9% |
0.439287286 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
3305 |
36.4% |
0.363506379 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
415 |
4.6% |
0.045644523 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
56 |
0.6% |
0.006159261 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk52
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The authorities should introduce more measures to
protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may
be at the expense of privacy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from
potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of
privacy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
643 |
7.1% |
0.070721513 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1778 |
19.6% |
0.195556533 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
2650 |
29.1% |
0.291465024 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1265 |
13.9% |
0.139133304 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1170 |
12.9% |
0.128684558 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1040 |
11.4% |
0.114386274 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
510 |
5.6% |
0.056093269 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
0.4% |
0.003959525 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r24_pcimm
|
Variable label:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
456 |
5.5% |
0.054913295 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
1933 |
23.3% |
0.232779383 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
3346 |
40.3% |
0.402938343 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1106 |
13.3% |
0.133188825 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
963 |
11.6% |
0.115968208 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
300 |
3.6% |
0.036127168 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
172 |
2.1% |
0.020712909 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.3% |
0.003371869 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3717 |
|
NA |
r23pkmeme9
|
Variable label:
|
Should be easier/harder for refugees to be granted residence in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and
their opportunity to be granted residence here?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much easier |
340 |
3.7% |
0.037395513 |
| 2 |
Easier |
1149 |
12.6% |
0.126374835 |
| 3 |
Somewhat easier |
1968 |
21.6% |
0.216454026 |
| 4 |
Same as today |
3302 |
36.3% |
0.363176419 |
| 5 |
Somewhat more difficult |
1112 |
12.2% |
0.122305323 |
| 6 |
More difficult |
670 |
7.4% |
0.073691157 |
| 7 |
Much more difficult |
524 |
5.8% |
0.057633084 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.3% |
0.002969644 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pkdv55
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It should be possible for parents to send their children
to Muslim schools.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian
schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the
Christian faith.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents
to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national
curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
229 |
2.5% |
0.02518698 |
| 2 |
Agree |
836 |
9.2% |
0.09194897 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1185 |
13.0% |
0.13033436 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1556 |
17.1% |
0.17113946 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1330 |
14.6% |
0.14628245 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1853 |
20.4% |
0.20380554 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
2078 |
22.9% |
0.22855257 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.3% |
0.00274967 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk101
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion on Norway’s preconditions for integrating refugees
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian
society for integrating refugees?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
701 |
7.7% |
0.077100748 |
| 2 |
Good |
2743 |
30.2% |
0.301693797 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
1933 |
21.3% |
0.212604487 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
944 |
10.4% |
0.103827541 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
1592 |
17.5% |
0.175098988 |
| 6 |
Bad |
881 |
9.7% |
0.096898372 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
267 |
2.9% |
0.029366476 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
0.3% |
0.003409591 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk_sentral
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: National authorities show little consideration for
non-urban/rural Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
|
|
Literal question:
|
National authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1308 |
14.4% |
0.143862736 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2166 |
23.8% |
0.238231412 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
2300 |
25.3% |
0.252969644 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1475 |
16.2% |
0.162230532 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
711 |
7.8% |
0.078200616 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
812 |
8.9% |
0.089309283 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
282 |
3.1% |
0.031016278 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
0.4% |
0.004179498 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk55
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The number of municipalities should be reduced.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway now has 356 municipalities instead of 422 as before. The number
of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
935 |
10.3% |
0.102837659 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1296 |
14.3% |
0.142542895 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1268 |
13.9% |
0.139463264 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1943 |
21.4% |
0.213704355 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
949 |
10.4% |
0.104377475 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1608 |
17.7% |
0.176858777 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1045 |
11.5% |
0.114936208 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.5% |
0.005279366 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23kmskepsis
|
Variable label:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I don’t believe that the climate is changing. |
35 |
0.4% |
0.003849538 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
336 |
3.7% |
0.036955565 |
| 3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent
due to human action |
1968 |
21.6% |
0.216454026 |
| 4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to
human action. |
6693 |
73.6% |
0.736141663 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
0.7% |
0.006599208 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pkkm2
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all concerned |
482 |
5.3% |
0.053013638 |
| 2 |
Not very concerned |
1327 |
14.6% |
0.145952486 |
| 3 |
Slightly concerned |
2758 |
30.3% |
0.303343599 |
| 4 |
Very concerned |
2887 |
31.8% |
0.317531896 |
| 5 |
Extremely concerned |
1625 |
17.9% |
0.178728553 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.1% |
0.001429828 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pkkm42
|
Variable label:
|
Proposal that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run
on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private
vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from
2025.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
|
Post-question:
|
See National Transport Plan 2018-2029, page 16, available here [external
link]: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-33-20162017/id2546287
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run
on hydrogen. |
2859 |
31.4% |
0.314452266 |
| 2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol. |
6166 |
67.8% |
0.678178619 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.7% |
0.007369116 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pkkm4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the
Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree
with this?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen
and Senja areas
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3048 |
33.5% |
0.335239771 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1730 |
19.0% |
0.190277167 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
932 |
10.3% |
0.102507699 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1140 |
12.5% |
0.125384954 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
827 |
9.1% |
0.090959085 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
808 |
8.9% |
0.088869336 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
586 |
6.4% |
0.064452266 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.2% |
0.002309723 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23pk_vekst
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of
industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of
industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
414 |
4.6% |
0.045534536 |
| 2 |
Agree |
985 |
10.8% |
0.108337000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
2028 |
22.3% |
0.223053234 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1160 |
12.8% |
0.127584690 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1964 |
21.6% |
0.216014078 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1692 |
18.6% |
0.186097668 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
819 |
9.0% |
0.090079190 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
0.3% |
0.003299604 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r23meme50
|
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
104 |
1.1% |
0.011438627 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
260 |
2.9% |
0.028596568 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
880 |
9.7% |
0.096788385 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2602 |
28.6% |
0.286185658 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2460 |
27.1% |
0.270567532 |
| 6 |
Really like |
2348 |
25.8% |
0.258249010 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
397 |
4.4% |
0.043664760 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
41 |
0.5% |
0.004509459 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r24_pceum
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
1044 |
12.6% |
0.125722543 |
| 2 |
Positive |
1602 |
19.3% |
0.192919075 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
1332 |
16.0% |
0.160404624 |
| 4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
874 |
10.5% |
0.105250482 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
1197 |
14.4% |
0.144147399 |
| 6 |
Negative |
1174 |
14.1% |
0.141377649 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
1067 |
12.8% |
0.128492293 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.2% |
0.001685934 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3717 |
|
NA |
r23pk103
|
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
1153 |
12.7% |
0.12681478 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
2293 |
25.2% |
0.25219974 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
2573 |
28.3% |
0.28299604 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
994 |
10.9% |
0.10932688 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1111 |
12.2% |
0.12219534 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
562 |
6.2% |
0.06181258 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
312 |
3.4% |
0.03431588 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
94 |
1.0% |
0.01033876 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2929 |
|
NA |
r24_pcnat
|
Variable label:
|
Norways membership status in NATO
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to your point of view:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway should continue to be a member of NATO. |
7961 |
95.9% |
0.958694605 |
| 2 |
Norway should opt out of NATO. |
308 |
3.7% |
0.037090559 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.4% |
0.004214836 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3717 |
|
NA |
r25_innae
|
Variable label:
|
How do you rate the increased military presence of NATO in Eastern
Europe?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
NATO has recently increased its military forces and military equipment
in Eastern Europe considerably.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you rate the increased military presence in Eastern Europe?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12021] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
3654 |
34.0% |
0.340445355 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
3759 |
35.0% |
0.350228268 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
1339 |
12.5% |
0.124755427 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
955 |
8.9% |
0.088977919 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
660 |
6.1% |
0.061492593 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
308 |
2.9% |
0.028696543 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
0.5% |
0.005403895 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1288 |
|
NA |
