Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Mette Andersson, Sveinung Arnesen, Gisela Böhm, Dag Elgesem, Odd Gåsdal,
Kristin Strømsnes, Endre Tvinnereim, and Jacob Aars
|
Scientific team, University of Bergen og Rokkansenteret
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality Assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in two waves,
wave 1 and wave 3. In wave 1 4.870 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 1). In wave 3 5.623 members are recruited. The
sampling procedure of wave 3 equals that of wave 1. A gross sample of 25
000 individuals was drawn from the Norwegian National Population
Registry. This register includes everyone born in Norway as well as
former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is
responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration. 25 000 individuals over
the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the register. The extracted data
was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, and e) age. The
sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.
Furthermore, all individuals over the age of 95 were excluded from the
sample. This amounted to 58 persons, thus leaving a net sample of 24 928
individuals before the recruitment process started.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a online questionnaire with postal recruitment.
Panel members were recruited in multiple steps.
First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters
contained the following information: a) a description of the project, b)
the Citizen Panel’s policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the
anonymity of the participants, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the
participants’ rights to opt of the panel at any time in the future, e)
contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a
unique log-in id and the web address to the panel’s web site and g) the
estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).
In order to maximize the response rate, an incentive in the form of a
travel gift card is included in the project. The value of the gift card
is 25 000 NOK. To enter the lottery respondents were required to join
the panel and provide their email addresses. Respondents were asked to
register on the panel’s web site and log into the survey using the
unique ID-code provided in their personal letter. Information on the
lottery was included in all correspondence with respondents.
The letter was posted 13th of October 2014.
A reminder post card was sent on the 23rd of October 2014 to those
respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b) had neither
completed the survey nor provided their email address. Respondents were
encouraged to join the panel, with reference to the invitation letter.
The unique log-in ID provided in the original letter was also included
in the post card.
Thereafter, respondent that had not responded to the survey received a
text message 13th of November. The log-in ID was given in the text
message.
The final step reached out to a subsample of 2 000 individuals with
registered phone number. The sample was contacted by phone. The
respondents were informed of the Norwegian Citizen Panel and encouraged
to opt in. Those who responded positively had the opportunity to receive
log-in credentials by email.
943 respondents were contacted in total. 649 did not want to opt in. 103
wanted to opt in, but did not want to receive email with log-in
credentials. 191 respondents wanted to participate, and received an
email.
In addition, 144 respondents refused to answer questions asked by
interviewer. Interviewer could not have a conversation with 59
respondents due to either age, sickness, or communication problems.
For various reasons the interviewer did not make contact with the
remaining respondents.
Data collection among existing panel members was conducted in parallel
with the recruitment of, and data collection among, new members. The
existing panel panel members also received reminder cards posted on the
13th of October.
Existing panel members with registered phone number also received a
reminder as a text message. Panel members without registered phone
number received the reminder as an email. All panel members that had not
responded to the survey received a last reminder by email. The email was
sent 21st of November.
Wave 3 was closed 27th of November
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix). When
calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s
geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These
attributes were included in the sample file we received from the
Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of
education is provided by the respondents when answering the
questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer
this question. Because of this, two different weights have been
calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-102
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 3
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
w03_Weight4
|
New
variable: Added w03_Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
w03_Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2020-07-01
|
w03_r3k26
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 3
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-12
|
w03_r3dv36
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-10
|
w03_r3cc7
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-10
|
w03_r3cc5
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-10
|
w03_r3cc6
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-10
|
w03_r3cc4b
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-10
|
w03_r3cc4c
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-10
|
w03_r3cc4a
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-09
|
w03_r3k14_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-09
|
w03_r3k14_2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-09
|
w03_r3k15
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-09
|
w03_r3cc7
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-09
|
w03_r3cc5
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-09
|
w03_ro1a
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-08
|
w03_r3km1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-08
|
w03_r3km2
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w03_p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w03_p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w03_r3k3_2
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-17
|
w03_p3
|
Updated the value of 1 respondent.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
w03_p4_1
|
Corrected values of 55 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
w03_p4_2
|
Corrected values of 55 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
w03_weight_2
|
Corrected values of 55 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-11-28
|
w03_r3k3
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
w03p4_1
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
w03p4_2
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r3lb1a
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r3lb1b
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r3lb1c
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2016-12-15
|
w03startdatetime
|
New variable.
|
|
NA
|
2016-12-15
|
w03completedatetime
|
New variable.
|
|
v-100
|
2014-12-12
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 3
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 3 - v-102-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
8515
|
|
# Variables
|
735
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_u
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes the respondents in five groups]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
1701 |
20.0% |
0.1997651 |
| 2 |
2 |
1719 |
20.2% |
0.2018790 |
| 3 |
3 |
1667 |
19.6% |
0.1957722 |
| 4 |
4 |
1722 |
20.2% |
0.2022314 |
| 5 |
5 |
1706 |
20.0% |
0.2003523 |
w03startDateTime
|
Variable label:
|
Date and time for when the questionnaire was opened
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03completeDateTime
|
Variable label:
|
Date and time for when the questionnaire was completed
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03recruited_w03
|
Variable label:
|
= 1 if the respondent was recruited in w03
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
2927 |
34.4% |
0.3437463 |
| 1 |
|
5588 |
65.6% |
0.6562537 |
w03recruited_w01
|
Variable label:
|
= 1 if the respondent was recruited in w01
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
5588 |
65.6% |
0.6562537 |
| 1 |
|
2927 |
34.4% |
0.3437463 |
w03respondent_w01
|
Variable label:
|
=1 if the the respondent participated in w01
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
5598 |
65.7% |
0.6574281 |
| 1 |
|
2917 |
34.3% |
0.3425719 |
w03respondent_w02
|
Variable label:
|
=1 if the respondent participated in w02
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
|
5934 |
69.7% |
0.6968878 |
| 1 |
|
2581 |
30.3% |
0.3031122 |
w03respondent_w03
|
Variable label:
|
=1 if the respondent participates in w03
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
|
8515 |
100.0% |
1 |
w03_r3k1
|
Variable label:
|
General interest in politics
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested in politics?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
844 |
9.9% |
0.099119201 |
| 2 |
Interested |
3702 |
43.5% |
0.434762184 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
2922 |
34.3% |
0.343159131 |
| 4 |
Slightly interested |
884 |
10.4% |
0.103816794 |
| 5 |
Not interested |
139 |
1.6% |
0.016324134 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
0.3% |
0.002818555 |
w03_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if the respondent is newly recruited, and selects the pair
of R3K3_1 or R3K204_1 in that order, or R3K204_2 and R3K3_2 in that
order. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5588] [Invalid:2927]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
2791 |
49.9% |
0.4994631 |
| 2 |
2 |
2797 |
50.1% |
0.5005369 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2927 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party last parliamentary election
|
|
Literal question:
|
What party did you vote for at the last parliamentary election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents were ran1=1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
125 |
4.5% |
0.04478681 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
710 |
25.4% |
0.25438911 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
265 |
9.5% |
0.09494805 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
165 |
5.9% |
0.05911860 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
150 |
5.4% |
0.05374418 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
106 |
3.8% |
0.03797922 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
90 |
3.2% |
0.03224651 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
731 |
26.2% |
0.26191329 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
54 |
1.9% |
0.01934790 |
| 10 |
Did not vote |
145 |
5.2% |
0.05195271 |
| 11 |
Was not entitled to vote |
172 |
6.2% |
0.06162666 |
| 12 |
Other |
38 |
1.4% |
0.01361519 |
| 97 |
No answer |
40 |
1.4% |
0.01433178 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5724 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k3_1_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Voted for following party last parliamentary election [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What party did you vote for at the last parliamentary election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents were ran1=1 are asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k204_1
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
What party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents were ran1=1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
125 |
4.5% |
0.04478681 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
595 |
21.3% |
0.21318524 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
220 |
7.9% |
0.07882479 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
153 |
5.5% |
0.05481906 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
123 |
4.4% |
0.04407023 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
105 |
3.8% |
0.03762092 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
132 |
4.7% |
0.04729488 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
998 |
35.8% |
0.35757793 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
43 |
1.5% |
0.01540666 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
92 |
3.3% |
0.03296310 |
| 11 |
Not entitled to vote |
76 |
2.7% |
0.02723038 |
| 12 |
Other: |
60 |
2.1% |
0.02149767 |
| 97 |
No answer |
69 |
2.5% |
0.02472232 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5724 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k204_1_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for following party if there were a parliamentary
election tomorrow [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents were ran1=1 are asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k204_2
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
What party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents where ran1=2 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
143 |
5.2% |
0.051680520 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
598 |
21.6% |
0.216118540 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
211 |
7.6% |
0.076255873 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
167 |
6.0% |
0.060354174 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
104 |
3.8% |
0.037585833 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
106 |
3.8% |
0.038308638 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
142 |
5.1% |
0.051319118 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1004 |
36.3% |
0.362847850 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
40 |
1.4% |
0.014456090 |
| 10 |
Did not vote |
113 |
4.1% |
0.040838453 |
| 11 |
Was not entitled to vote |
87 |
3.1% |
0.031441995 |
| 12 |
Other |
49 |
1.8% |
0.017708710 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001084207 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5748 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k204_2_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for following party if there were a parliamentary
election tomorrow [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents where ran1=2 are asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party last parliamentary election
|
|
Literal question:
|
What party did you vote for at the last parliamentary election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents where ran1=2 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
129 |
4.7% |
0.047080292 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
681 |
24.9% |
0.248540146 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
253 |
9.2% |
0.092335766 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
179 |
6.5% |
0.065328467 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
154 |
5.6% |
0.056204380 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
101 |
3.7% |
0.036861314 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
79 |
2.9% |
0.028832117 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
725 |
26.5% |
0.264598540 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
35 |
1.3% |
0.012773723 |
| 10 |
Did not vote |
161 |
5.9% |
0.058759124 |
| 11 |
Was not entitled to vote |
198 |
7.2% |
0.072262774 |
| 12 |
Other |
39 |
1.4% |
0.014233577 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002189781 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5775 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k3_2_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Voted for following party last parliamentary election [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What party did you vote for at the last parliamentary election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents where ran1=2 are asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k202
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with current government
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the current government?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
254 |
3.0% |
0.029829712 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2190 |
25.7% |
0.257193188 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2742 |
32.2% |
0.322019965 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
2275 |
26.7% |
0.267175573 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
973 |
11.4% |
0.114268937 |
| 97 |
No answer |
81 |
1.0% |
0.009512625 |
w03_r3k6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Christian Democrats
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
662 |
7.8% |
0.07774516 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1110 |
13.0% |
0.13035819 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1892 |
22.2% |
0.22219612 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2203 |
25.9% |
0.25871991 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1651 |
19.4% |
0.19389313 |
| 6 |
Really like |
481 |
5.6% |
0.05648855 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
107 |
1.3% |
0.01256606 |
| 97 |
No answer |
409 |
4.8% |
0.04803288 |
w03_r3k6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Conservative Party of Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party of Norway
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
365 |
4.3% |
0.04286553 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1075 |
12.6% |
0.12624780 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1483 |
17.4% |
0.17416324 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1013 |
11.9% |
0.11896653 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2090 |
24.5% |
0.24544921 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1730 |
20.3% |
0.20317087 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
369 |
4.3% |
0.04333529 |
| 97 |
No answer |
390 |
4.6% |
0.04580153 |
w03_r3k6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2075 |
24.4% |
0.24368761 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1614 |
19.0% |
0.18954786 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1223 |
14.4% |
0.14362889 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
870 |
10.2% |
0.10217264 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1406 |
16.5% |
0.16512038 |
| 6 |
Really like |
716 |
8.4% |
0.08408691 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
219 |
2.6% |
0.02571932 |
| 97 |
No answer |
392 |
4.6% |
0.04603641 |
w03_r3k6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
308 |
3.6% |
0.03617146 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
656 |
7.7% |
0.07704052 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1434 |
16.8% |
0.16840869 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2472 |
29.0% |
0.29031122 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2283 |
26.8% |
0.26811509 |
| 6 |
Really like |
800 |
9.4% |
0.09395185 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
138 |
1.6% |
0.01620669 |
| 97 |
No answer |
424 |
5.0% |
0.04979448 |
w03_r3k6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1120 |
13.2% |
0.13153259 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1340 |
15.7% |
0.15736935 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1450 |
17.0% |
0.17028773 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1791 |
21.0% |
0.21033470 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1542 |
18.1% |
0.18109219 |
| 6 |
Really like |
690 |
8.1% |
0.08103347 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
156 |
1.8% |
0.01832061 |
| 97 |
No answer |
426 |
5.0% |
0.05002936 |
w03_r3k6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
461 |
5.4% |
0.05413975 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
975 |
11.5% |
0.11450382 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1717 |
20.2% |
0.20164416 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2794 |
32.8% |
0.32812683 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1578 |
18.5% |
0.18532002 |
| 6 |
Really like |
449 |
5.3% |
0.05273048 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
98 |
1.2% |
0.01150910 |
| 97 |
No answer |
443 |
5.2% |
0.05202584 |
w03_r3k6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
478 |
5.6% |
0.05613623 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
695 |
8.2% |
0.08162067 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1055 |
12.4% |
0.12389900 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2712 |
31.8% |
0.31849677 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2024 |
23.8% |
0.23769818 |
| 6 |
Really like |
871 |
10.2% |
0.10229008 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
243 |
2.9% |
0.02853787 |
| 97 |
No answer |
437 |
5.1% |
0.05132120 |
w03_r3k6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
244 |
2.9% |
0.02865531 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
511 |
6.0% |
0.06001174 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1076 |
12.6% |
0.12636524 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1101 |
12.9% |
0.12930123 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2315 |
27.2% |
0.27187317 |
| 6 |
Really like |
2310 |
27.1% |
0.27128597 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
594 |
7.0% |
0.06975925 |
| 97 |
No answer |
364 |
4.3% |
0.04274809 |
w03_r3k6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1729 |
20.3% |
0.20305344 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1516 |
17.8% |
0.17803876 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1289 |
15.1% |
0.15137992 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2165 |
25.4% |
0.25425719 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
952 |
11.2% |
0.11180270 |
| 6 |
Really like |
307 |
3.6% |
0.03605402 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
98 |
1.2% |
0.01150910 |
| 97 |
No answer |
459 |
5.4% |
0.05390487 |
w03_r3k8_1
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political left-right scale
|
|
Literal question:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right
wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those that are politically on
the far left, and10 represents those that are politically on the far
right.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left wing |
151 |
1.8% |
0.01773341 |
| 2 |
1 |
257 |
3.0% |
0.03018203 |
| 3 |
2 |
701 |
8.2% |
0.08232531 |
| 4 |
3 |
1192 |
14.0% |
0.13998826 |
| 5 |
4 |
1033 |
12.1% |
0.12131533 |
| 6 |
5 |
1437 |
16.9% |
0.16876101 |
| 7 |
6 |
990 |
11.6% |
0.11626541 |
| 8 |
7 |
1196 |
14.0% |
0.14045802 |
| 9 |
8 |
868 |
10.2% |
0.10193776 |
| 10 |
9 |
262 |
3.1% |
0.03076923 |
| 11 |
10 Right wing |
195 |
2.3% |
0.02290076 |
| 97 |
No answer |
233 |
2.7% |
0.02736348 |
w03_r3k9_1
|
Variable label:
|
- Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most
important issue.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k9_2
|
Variable label:
|
- Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most
important issue.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k9_3
|
Variable label:
|
- Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you
personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most
important issue.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3dt16_1
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Christian Democrats
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right
wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0
means furthest to the left and 10 means furthest to the right?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left wing |
15 |
0.5% |
0.005124701 |
| 2 |
1 |
17 |
0.6% |
0.005807995 |
| 3 |
2 |
70 |
2.4% |
0.023915272 |
| 4 |
3 |
127 |
4.3% |
0.043389136 |
| 5 |
4 |
264 |
9.0% |
0.090194739 |
| 6 |
5 |
720 |
24.6% |
0.245985651 |
| 7 |
6 |
720 |
24.6% |
0.245985651 |
| 8 |
7 |
471 |
16.1% |
0.160915613 |
| 9 |
8 |
221 |
7.6% |
0.075503929 |
| 10 |
9 |
70 |
2.4% |
0.023915272 |
| 11 |
10 Right wing |
27 |
0.9% |
0.009224462 |
| 97 |
No answer |
205 |
7.0% |
0.070037581 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_2
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Conservative Party of Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil
du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre
og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party of Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left wing |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001708234 |
| 2 |
1 |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002049880 |
| 3 |
2 |
8 |
0.3% |
0.002733174 |
| 4 |
3 |
15 |
0.5% |
0.005124701 |
| 5 |
4 |
18 |
0.6% |
0.006149641 |
| 6 |
5 |
67 |
2.3% |
0.022890331 |
| 7 |
6 |
103 |
3.5% |
0.035189614 |
| 8 |
7 |
404 |
13.8% |
0.138025282 |
| 9 |
8 |
833 |
28.5% |
0.284591732 |
| 10 |
9 |
802 |
27.4% |
0.274000683 |
| 11 |
10 Right wing |
465 |
15.9% |
0.158865733 |
| 97 |
No answer |
201 |
6.9% |
0.068670994 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_3
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil
du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre
og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left wing |
12 |
0.4% |
0.004099761 |
| 2 |
1 |
13 |
0.4% |
0.004441408 |
| 3 |
2 |
11 |
0.4% |
0.003758114 |
| 4 |
3 |
19 |
0.6% |
0.006491288 |
| 5 |
4 |
27 |
0.9% |
0.009224462 |
| 6 |
5 |
87 |
3.0% |
0.029723266 |
| 7 |
6 |
63 |
2.2% |
0.021523744 |
| 8 |
7 |
128 |
4.4% |
0.043730782 |
| 9 |
8 |
333 |
11.4% |
0.113768364 |
| 10 |
9 |
726 |
24.8% |
0.248035531 |
| 11 |
10 Right wing |
1295 |
44.2% |
0.442432525 |
| 97 |
No answer |
213 |
7.3% |
0.072770755 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_4
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil
du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre
og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left wing |
205 |
7.0% |
0.070037581 |
| 2 |
1 |
137 |
4.7% |
0.046805603 |
| 3 |
2 |
206 |
7.0% |
0.070379228 |
| 4 |
3 |
269 |
9.2% |
0.091902972 |
| 5 |
4 |
332 |
11.3% |
0.113426717 |
| 6 |
5 |
597 |
20.4% |
0.203963102 |
| 7 |
6 |
546 |
18.7% |
0.186539119 |
| 8 |
7 |
289 |
9.9% |
0.098735907 |
| 9 |
8 |
99 |
3.4% |
0.033823027 |
| 10 |
9 |
24 |
0.8% |
0.008199522 |
| 11 |
10 Right wing |
12 |
0.4% |
0.004099761 |
| 97 |
No answer |
211 |
7.2% |
0.072087462 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_5
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil
du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre
og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left wing |
393 |
13.4% |
0.1342671677 |
| 2 |
1 |
920 |
31.4% |
0.3143149983 |
| 3 |
2 |
792 |
27.1% |
0.2705842159 |
| 4 |
3 |
347 |
11.9% |
0.1185514178 |
| 5 |
4 |
118 |
4.0% |
0.0403143150 |
| 6 |
5 |
94 |
3.2% |
0.0321147933 |
| 7 |
6 |
22 |
0.8% |
0.0075162282 |
| 8 |
7 |
15 |
0.5% |
0.0051247011 |
| 9 |
8 |
8 |
0.3% |
0.0027331739 |
| 10 |
9 |
6 |
0.2% |
0.0020498804 |
| 11 |
10 Right wing |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0006832935 |
| 97 |
No answer |
210 |
7.2% |
0.0717458148 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_6
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil
du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre
og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left wing |
31 |
1.1% |
0.010591049 |
| 2 |
1 |
56 |
1.9% |
0.019132217 |
| 3 |
2 |
170 |
5.8% |
0.058079945 |
| 4 |
3 |
340 |
11.6% |
0.116159891 |
| 5 |
4 |
654 |
22.3% |
0.223436966 |
| 6 |
5 |
904 |
30.9% |
0.308848650 |
| 7 |
6 |
355 |
12.1% |
0.121284592 |
| 8 |
7 |
117 |
4.0% |
0.039972668 |
| 9 |
8 |
50 |
1.7% |
0.017082337 |
| 10 |
9 |
15 |
0.5% |
0.005124701 |
| 11 |
10 Right wing |
11 |
0.4% |
0.003758114 |
| 97 |
No answer |
224 |
7.7% |
0.076528869 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_7
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil
du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre
og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left wing |
152 |
5.2% |
0.051930304 |
| 2 |
1 |
286 |
9.8% |
0.097710967 |
| 3 |
2 |
430 |
14.7% |
0.146908097 |
| 4 |
3 |
534 |
18.2% |
0.182439358 |
| 5 |
4 |
548 |
18.7% |
0.187222412 |
| 6 |
5 |
572 |
19.5% |
0.195421934 |
| 7 |
6 |
112 |
3.8% |
0.038264435 |
| 8 |
7 |
32 |
1.1% |
0.010932696 |
| 9 |
8 |
17 |
0.6% |
0.005807995 |
| 10 |
9 |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002049880 |
| 11 |
10 Right wing |
7 |
0.2% |
0.002391527 |
| 97 |
No answer |
231 |
7.9% |
0.078920396 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_8
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil
du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre
og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left wing |
65 |
2.2% |
0.022207038 |
| 2 |
1 |
149 |
5.1% |
0.050905364 |
| 3 |
2 |
369 |
12.6% |
0.126067646 |
| 4 |
3 |
648 |
22.1% |
0.221387086 |
| 5 |
4 |
634 |
21.7% |
0.216604031 |
| 6 |
5 |
509 |
17.4% |
0.173898189 |
| 7 |
6 |
205 |
7.0% |
0.070037581 |
| 8 |
7 |
93 |
3.2% |
0.031773147 |
| 9 |
8 |
29 |
1.0% |
0.009907755 |
| 10 |
9 |
11 |
0.4% |
0.003758114 |
| 11 |
10 Right wing |
13 |
0.4% |
0.004441408 |
| 97 |
No answer |
202 |
6.9% |
0.069012641 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_9
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil
du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre
og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left wing |
1577 |
53.9% |
0.538776905 |
| 2 |
1 |
548 |
18.7% |
0.187222412 |
| 3 |
2 |
193 |
6.6% |
0.065937820 |
| 4 |
3 |
114 |
3.9% |
0.038947728 |
| 5 |
4 |
53 |
1.8% |
0.018107277 |
| 6 |
5 |
124 |
4.2% |
0.042364195 |
| 7 |
6 |
25 |
0.9% |
0.008541168 |
| 8 |
7 |
25 |
0.9% |
0.008541168 |
| 9 |
8 |
10 |
0.3% |
0.003416467 |
| 10 |
9 |
7 |
0.2% |
0.002391527 |
| 11 |
10 Right wing |
23 |
0.8% |
0.007857875 |
| 97 |
No answer |
228 |
7.8% |
0.077895456 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k10
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
3202 |
37.6% |
0.376042278 |
| 2 |
Good |
3937 |
46.2% |
0.462360540 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
774 |
9.1% |
0.090898415 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
259 |
3.0% |
0.030416911 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
150 |
1.8% |
0.017615972 |
| 6 |
Bad |
61 |
0.7% |
0.007163829 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
23 |
0.3% |
0.002701116 |
| 97 |
No answer |
109 |
1.3% |
0.012800940 |
w03_r3k11
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with the way democracy works in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you about the way in which democracy works
in Norway?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
1500 |
17.6% |
0.17615972 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
4884 |
57.4% |
0.57357604 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1548 |
18.2% |
0.18179683 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
357 |
4.2% |
0.04192601 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
89 |
1.0% |
0.01045214 |
| 97 |
No answer |
137 |
1.6% |
0.01608925 |
w03_r3k14_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politics is sometimes so convoluted that people like me do
not understand what it is about
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Politics is sometimes so convoluted that people like me do not
understand what it is about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
282 |
5.0% |
0.05046528 |
| 2 |
Agree |
721 |
12.9% |
0.12902649 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1627 |
29.1% |
0.29115963 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
468 |
8.4% |
0.08375089 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
776 |
13.9% |
0.13886901 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1211 |
21.7% |
0.21671439 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
403 |
7.2% |
0.07211883 |
| 97 |
No answer |
100 |
1.8% |
0.01789549 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2927 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k14_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: People like me can probably vote, but we cannot do anything
else to influence politics
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
People like me can probably vote, but we cannot do anything else to
influence politics.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
376 |
6.7% |
0.06728704 |
| 2 |
Agree |
753 |
13.5% |
0.13475304 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
875 |
15.7% |
0.15658554 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
432 |
7.7% |
0.07730852 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1136 |
20.3% |
0.20329277 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1372 |
24.6% |
0.24552613 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
530 |
9.5% |
0.09484610 |
| 97 |
No answer |
114 |
2.0% |
0.02040086 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2927 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k15
|
Variable label:
|
Most people can be trusted
|
|
Literal question:
|
And now a more general question. Would you say that most people in
general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful
enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
0 means “Cannot be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be
trusted”.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Cannot be careful enough |
119 |
2.1% |
0.021295634 |
| 2 |
1 |
67 |
1.2% |
0.011989979 |
| 3 |
2 |
126 |
2.3% |
0.022548318 |
| 4 |
3 |
312 |
5.6% |
0.055833930 |
| 5 |
4 |
316 |
5.7% |
0.056549749 |
| 6 |
5 |
692 |
12.4% |
0.123836793 |
| 7 |
6 |
637 |
11.4% |
0.113994273 |
| 8 |
7 |
1252 |
22.4% |
0.224051539 |
| 9 |
8 |
1081 |
19.3% |
0.193450251 |
| 10 |
9 |
419 |
7.5% |
0.074982105 |
| 11 |
10 Most people can be trusted |
524 |
9.4% |
0.093772369 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
0.8% |
0.007695061 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2927 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k16_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: I have an opinion about most things
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements fit you as a person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have an opinion about most things
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
815 |
9.6% |
0.095713447 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
3218 |
37.8% |
0.377921315 |
| 3 |
A somewhat good fit |
2828 |
33.2% |
0.332119789 |
| 4 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
914 |
10.7% |
0.107339988 |
| 5 |
A somewhat bad fit |
444 |
5.2% |
0.052143277 |
| 6 |
A bad fit |
119 |
1.4% |
0.013975338 |
| 7 |
A very bad fit |
20 |
0.2% |
0.002348796 |
| 97 |
No answer |
157 |
1.8% |
0.018438050 |
w03_r3k16_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: I have strong opinions, either positive or negative, also
about issues that are new to me
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements fit you as a person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have strong opinions, either positive or negative, also about issues
that are new to me.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very good fit |
288 |
3.4% |
0.03382267 |
| 2 |
A good fit |
1267 |
14.9% |
0.14879624 |
| 3 |
A somewhat good fit |
2495 |
29.3% |
0.29301233 |
| 4 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
1973 |
23.2% |
0.23170875 |
| 5 |
A somewhat bad fit |
1293 |
15.2% |
0.15184968 |
| 6 |
A bad fit |
756 |
8.9% |
0.08878450 |
| 7 |
A very bad fit |
159 |
1.9% |
0.01867293 |
| 97 |
No answer |
284 |
3.3% |
0.03335291 |
w03_r3k17_1
|
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: TV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
TV
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
1472 |
17.3% |
0.17287140 |
| 2 |
Daily |
3912 |
45.9% |
0.45942454 |
| 3 |
Several times a week |
1728 |
20.3% |
0.20293600 |
| 4 |
Less often |
1014 |
11.9% |
0.11908397 |
| 5 |
Never |
236 |
2.8% |
0.02771580 |
| 97 |
No answer |
153 |
1.8% |
0.01796829 |
w03_r3k17_2
|
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Radio
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Radio
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
1700 |
20.0% |
0.19964768 |
| 2 |
Daily |
2683 |
31.5% |
0.31509102 |
| 3 |
Several times a week |
1740 |
20.4% |
0.20434527 |
| 4 |
Less often |
1640 |
19.3% |
0.19260129 |
| 5 |
Never |
426 |
5.0% |
0.05002936 |
| 97 |
No answer |
326 |
3.8% |
0.03828538 |
w03_r3k17_3
|
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Printed newspaper
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Printed newspaper
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
510 |
6.0% |
0.05989430 |
| 2 |
Daily |
3336 |
39.2% |
0.39177921 |
| 3 |
Several times a week |
1533 |
18.0% |
0.18003523 |
| 4 |
Less often |
2287 |
26.9% |
0.26858485 |
| 5 |
Never |
538 |
6.3% |
0.06318262 |
| 97 |
No answer |
311 |
3.7% |
0.03652378 |
w03_r3k17_4
|
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Online newspaper
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Online newspaper
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
2878 |
33.8% |
0.33799178 |
| 2 |
Daily |
2521 |
29.6% |
0.29606577 |
| 3 |
Several times a week |
1403 |
16.5% |
0.16476806 |
| 4 |
Less often |
1087 |
12.8% |
0.12765708 |
| 5 |
Never |
291 |
3.4% |
0.03417499 |
| 97 |
No answer |
335 |
3.9% |
0.03934234 |
w03_r3k17_5
|
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Facebook
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Facebook
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
1338 |
15.7% |
0.1571345 |
| 2 |
Daily |
1726 |
20.3% |
0.2027011 |
| 3 |
Several times a week |
1097 |
12.9% |
0.1288315 |
| 4 |
Less often |
1196 |
14.0% |
0.1404580 |
| 5 |
Never |
2638 |
31.0% |
0.3098062 |
| 97 |
No answer |
520 |
6.1% |
0.0610687 |
w03_r3k17_6
|
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Twitter
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Twitter
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
151 |
1.8% |
0.01773341 |
| 2 |
Daily |
167 |
2.0% |
0.01961245 |
| 3 |
Several times a week |
262 |
3.1% |
0.03076923 |
| 4 |
Less often |
958 |
11.3% |
0.11250734 |
| 5 |
Never |
6273 |
73.7% |
0.73669994 |
| 97 |
No answer |
704 |
8.3% |
0.08267763 |
w03_r3k17_7
|
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Other websites
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other websites
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Several times a day |
614 |
7.2% |
0.07210804 |
| 2 |
Daily |
1099 |
12.9% |
0.12906635 |
| 3 |
Several times a week |
1733 |
20.4% |
0.20352319 |
| 4 |
Less often |
2280 |
26.8% |
0.26776277 |
| 5 |
Never |
2086 |
24.5% |
0.24497945 |
| 97 |
No answer |
703 |
8.3% |
0.08256019 |
w03_km36
|
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat is climate change for you personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change for you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U does not equal 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
954 |
14.0% |
0.14037669 |
| 2 |
Serious |
2209 |
32.5% |
0.32504414 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
2164 |
31.8% |
0.31842260 |
| 4 |
Slightly serious |
1018 |
15.0% |
0.14979400 |
| 5 |
Slightly serious |
357 |
5.3% |
0.05253090 |
| 97 |
No answer |
94 |
1.4% |
0.01383167 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv30_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to
cutbacks in the welfare state.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to cutbacks in the
welfare state.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
263 |
3.1% |
0.03088667 |
| 2 |
Agree |
632 |
7.4% |
0.07422196 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1224 |
14.4% |
0.14374633 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
801 |
9.4% |
0.09406929 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1395 |
16.4% |
0.16382854 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2244 |
26.4% |
0.26353494 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1782 |
20.9% |
0.20927775 |
| 97 |
No answer |
174 |
2.0% |
0.02043453 |
w03_r3dv30_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Commercial private schools should be allowed.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Commercial private schools should be allowed.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
531 |
6.2% |
0.06236054 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1508 |
17.7% |
0.17709924 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1569 |
18.4% |
0.18426307 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1147 |
13.5% |
0.13470346 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1179 |
13.8% |
0.13846154 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1281 |
15.0% |
0.15044040 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1105 |
13.0% |
0.12977099 |
| 97 |
No answer |
195 |
2.3% |
0.02290076 |
w03_r3dv30_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Many public activities could have been carried out both with
better results and at lower cost, if they were operated by the private
sector.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Many public activities could have been carried out both with better
results and at lower cost, if they were operated by the private sector.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
600 |
7.0% |
0.07046389 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1404 |
16.5% |
0.16488550 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
2097 |
24.6% |
0.24627129 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
948 |
11.1% |
0.11133294 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1159 |
13.6% |
0.13611274 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1317 |
15.5% |
0.15466823 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
819 |
9.6% |
0.09618321 |
| 97 |
No answer |
171 |
2.0% |
0.02008221 |
w03_r3k31_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The government should contribute to reducing income
differences in society.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government should contribute to reducing income differences in
society.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
418 |
14.3% |
0.14280834 |
| 2 |
Agree |
765 |
26.1% |
0.26135975 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
793 |
27.1% |
0.27092586 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
274 |
9.4% |
0.09361121 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
300 |
10.2% |
0.10249402 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
223 |
7.6% |
0.07618722 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
1.6% |
0.01571575 |
| 97 |
No answer |
108 |
3.7% |
0.03689785 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k31_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is better for a country if there is a diversity of
different religions and beliefs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different
religions and beliefs.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8514] [Invalid:1] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
261 |
8.9% |
0.08916980 |
| 2 |
Agree |
634 |
21.7% |
0.21660403 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
616 |
21.0% |
0.21045439 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
411 |
14.0% |
0.14041681 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
417 |
14.2% |
0.14246669 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
324 |
11.1% |
0.11069354 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
160 |
5.5% |
0.05466348 |
| 97 |
No answer |
104 |
3.6% |
0.03553126 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5587 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k31_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that
Norway has committed to, should be carried out abroad.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has
committed to, should be carried out abroad.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
70 |
2.4% |
0.02391527 |
| 2 |
Agree |
219 |
7.5% |
0.07482064 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
350 |
12.0% |
0.11957636 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
679 |
23.2% |
0.23197813 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
542 |
18.5% |
0.18517253 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
700 |
23.9% |
0.23915272 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
252 |
8.6% |
0.08609498 |
| 97 |
No answer |
115 |
3.9% |
0.03928937 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dvh_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the area by
Lofoten and Vesterålen.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the area by Lofoten and
Vesterålen.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1692 |
19.9% |
0.19870816 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1416 |
16.6% |
0.16629477 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1050 |
12.3% |
0.12331180 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1519 |
17.8% |
0.17839107 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
946 |
11.1% |
0.11109806 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1086 |
12.8% |
0.12753964 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
583 |
6.8% |
0.06846741 |
| 97 |
No answer |
223 |
2.6% |
0.02618908 |
w03_r3dvh_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as
Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians
have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
713 |
8.4% |
0.08373459 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1566 |
18.4% |
0.18391075 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1533 |
18.0% |
0.18003523 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
828 |
9.7% |
0.09724016 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1587 |
18.6% |
0.18637698 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1235 |
14.5% |
0.14503817 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
862 |
10.1% |
0.10123312 |
| 97 |
No answer |
191 |
2.2% |
0.02243100 |
w03_r3dvh_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3560 |
41.8% |
0.41808573 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2313 |
27.2% |
0.27163829 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
715 |
8.4% |
0.08396947 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
596 |
7.0% |
0.06999413 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
460 |
5.4% |
0.05402231 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
369 |
4.3% |
0.04333529 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
306 |
3.6% |
0.03593658 |
| 97 |
No answer |
196 |
2.3% |
0.02301820 |
w03_r3fr1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Art and culture, band and choir
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied
arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums,
collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and
artistic activities]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
247 |
14.5% |
0.14520870 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1434 |
84.3% |
0.84303351 |
w03_r3fr1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Athletics and sport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle
club, company sports and disabled sports]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Athletics and sport |
395 |
23.2% |
0.23221634 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1286 |
75.6% |
0.75602587 |
w03_r3fr1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts.
Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners’ clubs. Student
societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and
recreational activities]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hobby, fritid, utendørsaktivitet |
304 |
17.9% |
0.17871840 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1377 |
81.0% |
0.80952381 |
w03_r3fr1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Education, training and research
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools
including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only
in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools.
Universities and University colleges. Vocational/technical education.
Adult education and further education. Research and development]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Education, training and research |
214 |
12.6% |
0.12580835 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1467 |
86.2% |
0.86243386 |
w03_r3fr1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Health, nursing and rescue work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home.
Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions.
Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and
ambulance services]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
87 |
5.1% |
0.05114638 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1594 |
93.7% |
0.93709583 |
w03_r3fr1_6
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Social services and substance abuse
care
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian
Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People’s Aid. Family
counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled.
Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer centres]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
112 |
6.6% |
0.06584362 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1569 |
92.2% |
0.92239859 |
w03_r3fr1_7
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Nature, environmental and animal
protection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental
protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection.
Veterinary services]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
56 |
3.3% |
0.03292181 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1625 |
95.5% |
0.95532040 |
w03_r3fr1_8
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Residents’ associations, community
associations and local neighbourhood
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
[Meeting house]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
236 |
13.9% |
0.13874192 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1445 |
85.0% |
0.84950029 |
w03_r3fr1_9
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Housing co-operatives and housing
associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
195 |
11.5% |
0.11463845 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1486 |
87.4% |
0.87360376 |
w03_r3fr1_10
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Rights, support and advocacy work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women’s rights.
Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners,
the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
52 |
3.1% |
0.03057025 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1629 |
95.8% |
0.95767196 |
w03_r3fr1_11
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Political parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties [Youth political parties]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Political parties |
46 |
2.7% |
0.02704292 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1635 |
96.1% |
0.96119929 |
w03_r3fr1_12
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: International exchange, emergency
help, assistance and human rights work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
[International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief
and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
87 |
5.1% |
0.05114638 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1594 |
93.7% |
0.93709583 |
w03_r3fr1_13
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Vocational, industry and trade unions
and associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee
organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations.
Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
122 |
7.2% |
0.07172252 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1559 |
91.7% |
0.91651969 |
w03_r3fr1_14
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Religion and beliefs including the
Church of Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations
linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other
religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the
Norwegian Humanist Association]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
137 |
8.1% |
0.08054086 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1544 |
90.8% |
0.90770135 |
w03_r3fr1_15
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Immigrant organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background,
culture, identity outside Norway]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Immigrant organisations |
15 |
0.9% |
0.008818342 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.011757790 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1666 |
97.9% |
0.979423868 |
w03_r3fr1_16
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Other, specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1681] [Invalid:6834]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify |
44 |
2.6% |
0.0261749 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1637 |
97.4% |
0.9738251 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6834 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr1_17
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: No
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
577 |
33.9% |
0.33921223 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1104 |
64.9% |
0.64902998 |
w03_r3fr1_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Other, specify [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Art and culture, band and choir
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied
arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums,
collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and
artistic activities]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
250 |
14.7% |
0.14697237 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1430 |
84.1% |
0.84068195 |
w03_r3fr2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Athletics and sport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle
club, company sports and disabled sports]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Athletics and sport |
434 |
25.5% |
0.25514403 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1246 |
73.3% |
0.73251029 |
w03_r3fr2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts.
Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners’ clubs. Student
societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and
recreational activities]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
354 |
20.8% |
0.20811287 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1326 |
78.0% |
0.77954145 |
w03_r3fr2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Education, training and research
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools
including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only
in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools.
Universities and University colleges. Vocational/technical education.
Adult education and further education. Research and development]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Education, training and research |
100 |
5.9% |
0.05878895 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1580 |
92.9% |
0.92886537 |
w03_r3fr2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Health, nursing and rescue work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home.
Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions.
Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and
ambulance services]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
98 |
5.8% |
0.05761317 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1582 |
93.0% |
0.93004115 |
w03_r3fr2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Social services and substance abuse
care
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian
Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People’s Aid. Family
counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled.
Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer centres]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
98 |
5.8% |
0.05761317 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1582 |
93.0% |
0.93004115 |
w03_r3fr2_7
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Nature, environmental and animal
protection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental
protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection.
Veterinary services]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
99 |
5.8% |
0.05820106 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1581 |
92.9% |
0.92945326 |
w03_r3fr2_8
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Residents’ associations, community
associations and local neighbourhood
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
[Meeting house]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
232 |
13.6% |
0.13639036 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1448 |
85.1% |
0.85126396 |
w03_r3fr2_9
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Housing co-operatives and housing
associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
222 |
13.1% |
0.13051146 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1458 |
85.7% |
0.85714286 |
w03_r3fr2_10
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Rights, support and advocacy work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women’s rights.
Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners,
the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
62 |
3.6% |
0.03644915 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1618 |
95.1% |
0.95120517 |
w03_r3fr2_11
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Political parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties [Youth political parties]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Political parties |
96 |
5.6% |
0.05643739 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1584 |
93.1% |
0.93121693 |
w03_r3fr2_12
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: International exchange, emergency
help, assistance and human rights work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
[International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief
and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
143 |
8.4% |
0.08406820 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1537 |
90.4% |
0.90358613 |
w03_r3fr2_13
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Vocational, industry and trade unions
and associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee
organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations.
Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
350 |
20.6% |
0.20576132 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1330 |
78.2% |
0.78189300 |
w03_r3fr2_14
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Religion and beliefs including the
Church of Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations
linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other
religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the
Norwegian Humanist Association]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
249 |
14.6% |
0.14638448 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1431 |
84.1% |
0.84126984 |
w03_r3fr2_15
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Immigrant organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background,
culture, identity outside Norway]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Immigrant organisations |
18 |
1.1% |
0.01058201 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1662 |
97.7% |
0.97707231 |
w03_r3fr2_16
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Other, specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1680] [Invalid:6835]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify |
33 |
2.0% |
0.01964286 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1647 |
98.0% |
0.98035714 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6835 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr2_17
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: No
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
432 |
25.4% |
0.25396825 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1248 |
73.4% |
0.73368607 |
w03_r3fr2_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Other, specify [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following
areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Art and culture, band and
choir
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied
arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums,
collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and
artistic activities]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
109 |
6.4% |
0.06407995 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1571 |
92.4% |
0.92357437 |
w03_r3fr3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Athletics and sport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle
club, company sports and disabled sports]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Athletics and sport |
122 |
7.2% |
0.07172252 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1558 |
91.6% |
0.91593180 |
w03_r3fr3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Hobbies, recreation,
outdoor activity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts.
Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners’ clubs. Student
societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and
recreational activities]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
114 |
6.7% |
0.06701940 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1566 |
92.1% |
0.92063492 |
w03_r3fr3_4
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Education, training and
research
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools
including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only
in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools.
Universities and University colleges. Vocational/technical education.
Adult education and further education. Research and development]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Education, training and research |
49 |
2.9% |
0.02880658 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1631 |
95.9% |
0.95884774 |
w03_r3fr3_5
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Health, nursing and rescue
work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home.
Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions.
Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and
ambulance services]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
26 |
1.5% |
0.01528513 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1654 |
97.2% |
0.97236919 |
w03_r3fr3_6
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Social services and
substance abuse care
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian
Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People’s Aid. Family
counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled.
Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer centres]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
24 |
1.4% |
0.01410935 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1656 |
97.4% |
0.97354497 |
w03_r3fr3_7
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Nature, environmental and
animal protection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental
protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection.
Veterinary services]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
13 |
0.8% |
0.007642563 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.012345679 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1667 |
98.0% |
0.980011758 |
w03_r3fr3_8
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Residents’ associations,
community associations and local neighbourhood
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
[Meeting house]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
69 |
4.1% |
0.04056437 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1611 |
94.7% |
0.94708995 |
w03_r3fr3_9
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Housing co-operatives and
housing associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
60 |
3.5% |
0.03527337 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1620 |
95.2% |
0.95238095 |
w03_r3fr3_10
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Rights, support and
advocacy work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women’s rights.
Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners,
the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
18 |
1.1% |
0.01058201 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1662 |
97.7% |
0.97707231 |
w03_r3fr3_11
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Political parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties [Youth political parties]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Political parties |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01646091 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1652 |
97.1% |
0.97119342 |
w03_r3fr3_12
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: International exchange,
emergency help, assistance and human rights work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
[International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief
and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007054674 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.012345679 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1668 |
98.1% |
0.980599647 |
w03_r3fr3_13
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Vocational, industry and
trade unions and associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee
organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations.
Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
88 |
5.2% |
0.05173427 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1592 |
93.6% |
0.93592005 |
w03_r3fr3_14
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Religion and beliefs
including the Church of Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations
linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other
religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the
Norwegian Humanist Association]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
75 |
4.4% |
0.04409171 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1605 |
94.4% |
0.94356261 |
w03_r3fr3_15
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Immigrant organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background,
culture, identity outside Norway]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Immigrant organisations |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004115226 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.012345679 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1673 |
98.4% |
0.983539095 |
w03_r3fr3_16
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Other, specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1680] [Invalid:6835]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify |
26 |
1.5% |
0.01547619 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1654 |
98.5% |
0.98452381 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6835 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr3_17
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: No
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
941 |
55.3% |
0.55320400 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
739 |
43.4% |
0.43445032 |
w03_r3fr3_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Other, specify [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in
any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr4
|
Variable label:
|
Why don’t you participate in voluntary work? [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Why don’t you participate in voluntary work?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_ran75
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=1, a organization is selected in R3FR1, and selects one
of the following questions: R3FR5 or R3FR6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1680] [Invalid:6835]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
1 |
643 |
38.3% |
0.3827381 |
| 1 |
2 |
1037 |
61.7% |
0.6172619 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6835 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr5
|
Variable label:
|
Time spent on voluntary work
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the last year as a whole, roughly how much time did
you spend on voluntary work in an ordinary week?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran75=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than half an hour |
382 |
36.8% |
0.368370299 |
| 2 |
Between half an hour and one hour |
188 |
18.1% |
0.181292189 |
| 3 |
1 to 2 hours |
202 |
19.5% |
0.194792671 |
| 4 |
2 to 5 hours |
145 |
14.0% |
0.139826422 |
| 5 |
More than 5 hours |
110 |
10.6% |
0.106075217 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.0% |
0.009643202 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7478 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr6
|
Variable label:
|
Time spent participating in member activities in a voluntary
organisation
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the last year as a whole, roughly how much time did
you spend participating in member activities in a voluntary
organisation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
(e.g. involved in training, exercises, membership meetings, social
gatherings or similar)
[Asked if ran75=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than half an hour |
247 |
23.8% |
0.23818708 |
| 2 |
Between half an hour and one hour |
103 |
9.9% |
0.09932498 |
| 3 |
1 to 2 hours |
143 |
13.8% |
0.13789778 |
| 4 |
2 to 5 hours |
169 |
16.3% |
0.16297011 |
| 5 |
More than 5 hours |
335 |
32.3% |
0.32304725 |
| 97 |
No answer |
40 |
3.9% |
0.03857281 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7478 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Asked to: Be a member of an organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last five years, has anyone asked you to …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Be a member of an organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
582 |
34.2% |
0.34215168 |
| 2 |
Yes, once |
266 |
15.6% |
0.15637860 |
| 3 |
Yes, 2-3 times |
435 |
25.6% |
0.25573192 |
| 4 |
Yes, more than 3 times |
302 |
17.8% |
0.17754262 |
| 97 |
No answer |
116 |
6.8% |
0.06819518 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr7_2
|
Variable label:
|
Asked to: Sit on the board of an organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last five years, has anyone asked you to …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sit on the board of an organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
834 |
49.0% |
0.49029982 |
| 2 |
Yes, once |
381 |
22.4% |
0.22398589 |
| 3 |
Yes, 2-3 times |
264 |
15.5% |
0.15520282 |
| 4 |
Yes, more than 3 times |
97 |
5.7% |
0.05702528 |
| 97 |
No answer |
125 |
7.3% |
0.07348618 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr7_3
|
Variable label:
|
Asked to: Do voluntary work for an organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last five years, has anyone asked you to …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do voluntary work for an organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
800 |
47.0% |
0.47031158 |
| 2 |
Yes, once |
268 |
15.8% |
0.15755438 |
| 3 |
Yes, 2-3 times |
300 |
17.6% |
0.17636684 |
| 4 |
Yes, more than 3 times |
199 |
11.7% |
0.11699001 |
| 97 |
No answer |
134 |
7.9% |
0.07877719 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr7_4
|
Variable label:
|
Asked to: Give money to a voluntary organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last five years, has anyone asked you to …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give money to a voluntary organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
124 |
7.3% |
0.07289830 |
| 2 |
Yes, once |
84 |
4.9% |
0.04938272 |
| 3 |
Yes, 2-3 times |
290 |
17.0% |
0.17048795 |
| 4 |
Yes, more than 3 times |
1146 |
67.4% |
0.67372134 |
| 97 |
No answer |
57 |
3.4% |
0.03350970 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=1, and selects one of the following questions: R3FR8 or
R3FR28]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1680] [Invalid:6835]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
838 |
49.9% |
0.4988095 |
| 2 |
2 |
842 |
50.1% |
0.5011905 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6835 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr8
|
Variable label:
|
Opportunities are to participate in voluntary work in your local
neighbourhood
|
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad do you think the opportunities are to participate in
voluntary work in your local neighbourhood?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
242 |
28.9% |
0.288782816 |
| 2 |
Good |
288 |
34.4% |
0.343675418 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
99 |
11.8% |
0.118138425 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
150 |
17.9% |
0.178997613 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
28 |
3.3% |
0.033412888 |
| 6 |
Bad |
12 |
1.4% |
0.014319809 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009546539 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.013126492 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: One has a moral duty to participate in voluntary work at some
point in life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
One has a moral duty to participate in voluntary work at some point in
life
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
255 |
15.0% |
0.14991182 |
| 2 |
Agree |
447 |
26.3% |
0.26278660 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
330 |
19.4% |
0.19400353 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
284 |
16.7% |
0.16696061 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
89 |
5.2% |
0.05232216 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
151 |
8.9% |
0.08877131 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
86 |
5.1% |
0.05055850 |
| 97 |
No answer |
59 |
3.5% |
0.03468548 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: One has a moral duty to donate money to important causes if
one can afford it
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
One has a moral duty to donate money to important causes if one can
afford it
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
301 |
17.7% |
0.17695473 |
| 2 |
Agree |
512 |
30.1% |
0.30099941 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
325 |
19.1% |
0.19106408 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
211 |
12.4% |
0.12404468 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
97 |
5.7% |
0.05702528 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
119 |
7.0% |
0.06995885 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
83 |
4.9% |
0.04879483 |
| 97 |
No answer |
53 |
3.1% |
0.03115814 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr9_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: One becomes happy from voluntary work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
One becomes happy from voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
336 |
19.8% |
0.197530864 |
| 2 |
Agree |
617 |
36.3% |
0.362727807 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
326 |
19.2% |
0.191651969 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
297 |
17.5% |
0.174603175 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
20 |
1.2% |
0.011757790 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
26 |
1.5% |
0.015285126 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
1.0% |
0.009994121 |
| 97 |
No answer |
62 |
3.6% |
0.036449148 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr9_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: One becomes happy from donating money to important causes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
One becomes happy from donating money to important causes
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
264 |
15.5% |
0.15520282 |
| 2 |
Agree |
512 |
30.1% |
0.30099941 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
391 |
23.0% |
0.22986479 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
355 |
20.9% |
0.20870076 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
46 |
2.7% |
0.02704292 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
50 |
2.9% |
0.02939447 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
| 97 |
No answer |
63 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr10_1
|
Variable label:
|
Scarcity: Time
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you say that you have a scarcity of …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Time
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
212 |
12.5% |
0.12463257 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
389 |
22.9% |
0.22868901 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
555 |
32.6% |
0.32627866 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
373 |
21.9% |
0.21928277 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
126 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
| 97 |
No answer |
46 |
2.7% |
0.02704292 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr10_2
|
Variable label:
|
Scarcity: Money
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you say that you have a scarcity of …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Money
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
100 |
5.9% |
0.05878895 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
167 |
9.8% |
0.09817754 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
520 |
30.6% |
0.30570253 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
674 |
39.6% |
0.39623751 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
196 |
11.5% |
0.11522634 |
| 97 |
No answer |
44 |
2.6% |
0.02586714 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=1 and ran75=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1037] [Invalid:7478]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
179 |
17.3% |
0.1726133 |
| 2 |
2 |
180 |
17.4% |
0.1735776 |
| 3 |
3 |
168 |
16.2% |
0.1620058 |
| 4 |
4 |
172 |
16.6% |
0.1658631 |
| 5 |
5 |
176 |
17.0% |
0.1697203 |
| 6 |
6 |
162 |
15.6% |
0.1562199 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7478 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr11_1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Reasons for doing voluntary work: As a voluntary worker I show
compassion for those who are worse off than I am
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
As a voluntary worker I show compassion for those who are worse off than
I am
|
|
Technical description:
|
Choose the statements that you think are important reasons for why
you do voluntary work.
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
As a voluntary worker I show compassion for those who are worse off than I am |
79 |
44.1% |
0.4413408 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8336 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
100 |
55.9% |
0.5586592 |
w03_r3fr11_1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Reasons for doing voluntary work: It is good to have a certificate
showing that I did voluntary work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is good to have a certificate showing that I did voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It is good to have a certificate showing that I did voluntary work |
18 |
10.1% |
0.1005587 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8336 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
161 |
89.9% |
0.8994413 |
w03_r3fr11_1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Reasons for doing voluntary work: It gives me meaning when I do
voluntary work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It gives me meaning when I do voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It gives me meaning when I do voluntary work |
79 |
44.1% |
0.4413408 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8336 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
100 |
55.9% |
0.5586592 |
w03_r3fr11_1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Reasons for doing voluntary work: As a volunteer I learn something
through practical experience
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
As a volunteer I learn something through practical experience
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
As a volunteer I learn something through practical experience |
104 |
58.1% |
0.5810056 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8336 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
75 |
41.9% |
0.4189944 |
w03_r3fr11_2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Number of reasons of doing voluntary work: Help, certificate,
meaningful, practical experience
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many of the following reasons for voluntary work are important
for you? You do not need to state what reasons are important, just how
many.
It is important for me to help others It is good to have a certificate
showing that I did voluntary work It gives me meaning when I do
voluntary work As a volunteer I learn something through practical
experience
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
5 |
2.8% |
0.02777778 |
| 2 |
1 |
32 |
17.8% |
0.17777778 |
| 3 |
2 |
63 |
35.0% |
0.35000000 |
| 4 |
3 |
49 |
27.2% |
0.27222222 |
| 5 |
4 |
29 |
16.1% |
0.16111111 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.1% |
0.01111111 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8335 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr11_3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Number of reasons of doing voluntary work: Certificate, meaningful,
practical experience
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many of the following reasons for voluntary work are important
for you? You do not need to state what reasons are important, just how
many.
It is good to have a certificate showing that I did voluntary work It
gives me meaning when I do voluntary work As a volunteer I learn
something through practical experience
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
16 |
9.5% |
0.09523810 |
| 2 |
1 |
46 |
27.4% |
0.27380952 |
| 3 |
2 |
73 |
43.5% |
0.43452381 |
| 4 |
3 |
27 |
16.1% |
0.16071429 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8347 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr11_4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Number of reasons of doing voluntary work: Help, meaningful, practical
experience
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many of the following reasons for voluntary work are important
for you? You do not need to state what reasons are important, just how
many.
It is important for me to help others It gives me meaning when I do
voluntary work As a volunteer I learn something through practical
experience
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
7 |
4.1% |
0.04069767 |
| 2 |
1 |
35 |
20.3% |
0.20348837 |
| 3 |
2 |
74 |
43.0% |
0.43023256 |
| 4 |
3 |
54 |
31.4% |
0.31395349 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8343 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr11_5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Number of reasons of doing voluntary work: Help, certificate, practical
experience
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many of the following reasons for voluntary work are important
for you? You do not need to state what reasons are important, just how
many.
It is important for me to help others It is good to have a certificate
showing that I did voluntary work As a volunteer I learn something
through practical experience
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=1 og ran3=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
7 |
4.0% |
0.03977273 |
| 2 |
1 |
52 |
29.5% |
0.29545455 |
| 3 |
2 |
91 |
51.7% |
0.51704545 |
| 4 |
3 |
24 |
13.6% |
0.13636364 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.1% |
0.01136364 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8339 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr11_6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Number of reasons of doing voluntary work: Help, certificate, meaningful
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many of the following reasons for voluntary work are important
for you? You do not need to state what reasons are important, just how
many.
It is important for me to help others It is good to have a certificate
showing that I did voluntary work It gives me meaning when I do
voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=1 og ran3=6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
12 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
| 2 |
1 |
68 |
42.0% |
0.41975309 |
| 3 |
2 |
62 |
38.3% |
0.38271605 |
| 4 |
3 |
17 |
10.5% |
0.10493827 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.9% |
0.01851852 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8353 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr12
|
Variable label:
|
Stopped doing voluntary work
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you think back over the last five years, have you stopped doing
voluntary work for an organisation you previously did voluntary work
for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
(Answer yes even if you continue to do voluntary work within other
organisations)
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
513 |
30.2% |
0.30158730 |
| 2 |
No |
1105 |
65.0% |
0.64961787 |
| 97 |
No answer |
83 |
4.9% |
0.04879483 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr13
|
Variable label:
|
Stopped doing voluntary work, what organization
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the organisation that you most recently stopped doing
voluntary work for, what type of organisation was it?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=1 og R3FR12=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
46 |
9.0% |
0.089668616 |
| 2 |
Athletics and sport |
80 |
15.6% |
0.155945419 |
| 3 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
36 |
7.0% |
0.070175439 |
| 4 |
Education, training and research |
31 |
6.0% |
0.060428850 |
| 5 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
14 |
2.7% |
0.027290448 |
| 6 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
14 |
2.7% |
0.027290448 |
| 7 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
6 |
1.2% |
0.011695906 |
| 8 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
35 |
6.8% |
0.068226121 |
| 9 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
19 |
3.7% |
0.037037037 |
| 10 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
5 |
1.0% |
0.009746589 |
| 11 |
Political parties |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003898635 |
| 12 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
5 |
1.0% |
0.009746589 |
| 13 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
15 |
2.9% |
0.029239766 |
| 14 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
26 |
5.1% |
0.050682261 |
| 15 |
Immigrant organisations |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003898635 |
| 16 |
Other, specify |
3 |
0.6% |
0.005847953 |
| 97 |
No answer |
174 |
33.9% |
0.339181287 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8002 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr13_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Stopped doing voluntary work, what organization: Other, specify [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the organisation that you most recently stopped doing
voluntary work for, what type of organisation was it?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr14
|
Variable label:
|
How long did you do voluntary work for this organisation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How long did you do voluntary work for this organisation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than a month |
25 |
4.9% |
0.04873294 |
| 2 |
One month-six months |
13 |
2.5% |
0.02534113 |
| 3 |
Six months-one year |
34 |
6.6% |
0.06627680 |
| 4 |
1-2 years |
100 |
19.5% |
0.19493177 |
| 5 |
3-5 years |
149 |
29.0% |
0.29044834 |
| 6 |
6-10 years |
101 |
19.7% |
0.19688109 |
| 7 |
11-25 years |
58 |
11.3% |
0.11306043 |
| 8 |
More than 25 years |
20 |
3.9% |
0.03898635 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
2.5% |
0.02534113 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8002 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr15_1
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work: Changed life situation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you stop doing voluntary work for this organisation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Changed life situation (work, situation at home, relocation, children
being older etc.)
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Changed life situation (work, situation at home, relocation, children being
older etc.) |
298 |
58.1% |
0.580896686 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003898635 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8002 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
213 |
41.5% |
0.415204678 |
w03_r3fr15_2
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work: Changed interest or motivation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you stop doing voluntary work for this organisation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Changed interest or motivation
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Changed interest or motivation |
112 |
21.8% |
0.218323587 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003898635 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8002 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
399 |
77.8% |
0.777777778 |
w03_r3fr15_3
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work: Conditions related to the
organisation or the voluntary work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you stop doing voluntary work for this organisation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work |
74 |
14.4% |
0.144249513 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003898635 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8002 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
437 |
85.2% |
0.851851852 |
w03_r3fr15_4
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work: Something else, please specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you stop doing voluntary work for this organisation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Something else, please specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Something else, please specify |
83 |
16.2% |
0.161793372 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003898635 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8002 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
428 |
83.4% |
0.834307992 |
w03_r3fr15_4_other
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work: Something else, please specify [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you stop doing voluntary work for this organisation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Something else, please specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr16_1
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Not enough
time
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about your life situation that resulted in you stopping
doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Not enough time
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not enough time |
101 |
33.9% |
0.3389262 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8217 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
197 |
66.1% |
0.6610738 |
w03_r3fr16_2
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Moved away
from the area
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about your life situation that resulted in you stopping
doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Moved away from the area
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Moved away from the area |
72 |
24.2% |
0.2416107 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8217 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
226 |
75.8% |
0.7583893 |
w03_r3fr16_3
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Children
stopped doing the activities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about your life situation that resulted in you stopping
doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Children stopped doing the activities
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Children stopped doing the activities |
102 |
34.2% |
0.3422819 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8217 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
196 |
65.8% |
0.6577181 |
w03_r3fr16_4
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Health
problems or old age
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about your life situation that resulted in you stopping
doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health problems or old age
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health problems or old age |
55 |
18.5% |
0.1845638 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8217 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
243 |
81.5% |
0.8154362 |
w03_r3fr16_5
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Other,
specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about your life situation that resulted in you stopping
doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
27 |
9.1% |
0.09060403 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8217 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
271 |
90.9% |
0.90939597 |
w03_r3fr16_5_other
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Other,
specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about your life situation that resulted in you stopping
doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_1=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr17_1
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Wanted/had to spend
more time at home
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you have less time or would rather use the time on something
else?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Wanted/had to spend more time at home
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR16_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wanted/had to spend more time at home |
31 |
30.7% |
0.3069307 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
36.6% |
0.3663366 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8414 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
33 |
32.7% |
0.3267327 |
w03_r3fr17_2
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Wanted/had to spend
more time at work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you have less time or would rather use the time on something
else?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Wanted/had to spend more time at work
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR16_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wanted/had to spend more time at work |
39 |
38.6% |
0.3861386 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
36.6% |
0.3663366 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8414 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
25 |
24.8% |
0.2475248 |
w03_r3fr17_3
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Wanted/had to spend
more time participating in another organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you have less time or would rather use the time on something
else?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Wanted/had to spend more time participating in another organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR16_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wanted/had to spend more time participating in another organisation |
3 |
3.0% |
0.02970297 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
36.6% |
0.36633663 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8414 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
61 |
60.4% |
0.60396040 |
w03_r3fr17_4
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Wanted/had to spend
more time at other recreational activities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you have less time or would rather use the time on something
else?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Wanted/had to spend more time at other recreational activities
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR16_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wanted/had to spend more time at other recreational activities |
10 |
9.9% |
0.0990099 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
36.6% |
0.3663366 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8414 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
54 |
53.5% |
0.5346535 |
w03_r3fr17_5
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Other, specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you have less time or would rather use the time on something
else?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR16_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
3 |
3.0% |
0.02970297 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
36.6% |
0.36633663 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8414 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
61 |
60.4% |
0.60396040 |
w03_r3fr17_5_other
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Other, specify [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you have less time or would rather use the time on something
else?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR16_1=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr18_1
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Lost interest
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Lost interest
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lost interest |
49 |
43.8% |
0.4375 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
63 |
56.2% |
0.5625 |
w03_r3fr18_2
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Received too little
recognition
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Received too little recognition
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Received too little recognition |
14 |
12.5% |
0.125 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
98 |
87.5% |
0.875 |
w03_r3fr18_3
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Could not do what I enjoy
doing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Could not do what I enjoy doing
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Could not do what I enjoy doing |
5 |
4.5% |
0.04464286 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
107 |
95.5% |
0.95535714 |
w03_r3fr18_4
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: The activity was too
tiresome or boring
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The activity was too tiresome or boring
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The activity was too tiresome or boring |
21 |
18.8% |
0.1875 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
91 |
81.2% |
0.8125 |
w03_r3fr18_5
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Did not experience it as
being useful enough
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Did not experience it as being useful enough
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Did not experience it as being useful enough |
22 |
19.6% |
0.1964286 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
90 |
80.4% |
0.8035714 |
w03_r3fr18_6
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Did not experience it as
being interesting or challenging enough
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Did not experience it as being interesting or challenging enough
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Did not experience it as being interesting or challenging enough |
18 |
16.1% |
0.1607143 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
94 |
83.9% |
0.8392857 |
w03_r3fr18_7
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Was given too much work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was given too much work
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was given too much work |
19 |
17.0% |
0.1696429 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
93 |
83.0% |
0.8303571 |
w03_r3fr18_8
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Was given too little work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was given too little work
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was given too little work |
1 |
0.9% |
0.008928571 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
111 |
99.1% |
0.991071429 |
w03_r3fr18_9
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Other, specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
18 |
16.1% |
0.1607143 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
94 |
83.9% |
0.8392857 |
w03_r3fr18_9_other
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Other, specify [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr19_1
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: The
organisation was closed down or was not relevant any more
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The organisation was closed down or was not relevant any more
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The organisation was closed down or was not relevant any more |
13 |
17.6% |
0.1756757 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
61 |
82.4% |
0.8243243 |
w03_r3fr19_2
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Could not do
what I enjoyed doing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Could not do what I enjoyed doing
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Could not do what I enjoyed doing |
5 |
6.8% |
0.06756757 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
69 |
93.2% |
0.93243243 |
w03_r3fr19_3
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Too
bureaucratic organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Too bureaucratic organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Too bureaucratic organisation |
10 |
13.5% |
0.1351351 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
64 |
86.5% |
0.8648649 |
w03_r3fr19_4
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Not structured
enough
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Not structured enough
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not structured enough |
16 |
21.6% |
0.2162162 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
58 |
78.4% |
0.7837838 |
w03_r3fr19_5
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Too much
responsibility on too few people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Too much responsibility on too few people
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Too much responsibility on too few people |
17 |
23.0% |
0.2297297 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
57 |
77.0% |
0.7702703 |
w03_r3fr19_6
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Not enough
training or guidance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Not enough training or guidance
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not enough training or guidance |
4 |
5.4% |
0.05405405 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
70 |
94.6% |
0.94594595 |
w03_r3fr19_7
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Conflicts with
employees
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Conflicts with employees
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Conflicts with employees |
6 |
8.1% |
0.08108108 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
68 |
91.9% |
0.91891892 |
w03_r3fr19_8
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Conflicts with
other volunteers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Conflicts with other volunteers
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Conflicts with other volunteers |
11 |
14.9% |
0.1486486 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
63 |
85.1% |
0.8513514 |
w03_r3fr19_9
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Poor social
environment
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Poor social environment
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Poor social environment |
11 |
14.9% |
0.1486486 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
63 |
85.1% |
0.8513514 |
w03_r3fr19_10
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Received too
little recognition
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Received too little recognition
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Received too little recognition |
9 |
12.2% |
0.1216216 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
65 |
87.8% |
0.8783784 |
w03_r3fr19_11
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Too tiresome or
boring
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Too tiresome or boring
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Too tiresome or boring |
6 |
8.1% |
0.08108108 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
68 |
91.9% |
0.91891892 |
w03_r3fr19_12
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Too expensive
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Too expensive
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Too expensive |
2 |
2.7% |
0.02702703 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
72 |
97.3% |
0.97297297 |
w03_r3fr19_13
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: The voluntary
work was a one-time occurrence
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The voluntary work was a one-time occurrence
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The voluntary work was a one-time occurrence |
12 |
16.2% |
0.1621622 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
62 |
83.8% |
0.8378378 |
w03_r3fr19_14
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Other, specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
11 |
14.9% |
0.1486486 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
63 |
85.1% |
0.8513514 |
w03_r3fr19_14_other
|
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Other, specify
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you
to stop?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr20
|
Variable label:
|
Sometimes consider stopping doing voluntary work
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you sometimes consider stopping doing voluntary work for one or more
organisations where you are currently active?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
161 |
14.6% |
0.1457014 |
| 2 |
No |
820 |
74.2% |
0.7420814 |
| 97 |
No answer |
124 |
11.2% |
0.1122172 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7410 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr21
|
Variable label:
|
What organisation are you considering stopping doing voluntary work for?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What organisation are you considering stopping doing voluntary work for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
If you are considering stopping doing voluntary work for several
organisations, we would like you to think about the organisation where
you have done the most voluntary work during the last year.
[Asked if U=1, antallorg=1 and R3FR20=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
6 |
5.6% |
0.056074766 |
| 2 |
Athletics and sport |
25 |
23.4% |
0.233644860 |
| 3 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
11 |
10.3% |
0.102803738 |
| 4 |
Education, training and research |
7 |
6.5% |
0.065420561 |
| 5 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
2 |
1.9% |
0.018691589 |
| 6 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
4 |
3.7% |
0.037383178 |
| 7 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 8 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
5 |
4.7% |
0.046728972 |
| 9 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
8 |
7.5% |
0.074766355 |
| 10 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
2 |
1.9% |
0.018691589 |
| 11 |
Political parties |
2 |
1.9% |
0.018691589 |
| 12 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
2 |
1.9% |
0.018691589 |
| 13 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
4 |
3.7% |
0.037383178 |
| 14 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
4 |
3.7% |
0.037383178 |
| 15 |
Immigrant organisations |
1 |
0.9% |
0.009345794 |
| 16 |
Other, specify |
2 |
1.9% |
0.018691589 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
20.6% |
0.205607477 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8408 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr21_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other, specify: What organisation are you considering stopping doing
voluntary work for? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What organisation are you considering stopping doing voluntary work for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
If you are considering stopping doing voluntary work for several
organisations, we would like you to think about the organisation where
you have done the most voluntary work during the last year.
[Asked if U=1 and antallorg=1 and R3FR20=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr22
|
Variable label:
|
How long have you been doing voluntary work within this organisation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How long have you been doing voluntary work within this organisation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and antallorg=1 and R3FR20=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than a month |
6 |
5.6% |
0.05607477 |
| 2 |
One month-six months |
2 |
1.9% |
0.01869159 |
| 3 |
Six months-one year |
10 |
9.3% |
0.09345794 |
| 4 |
1-2 years |
9 |
8.4% |
0.08411215 |
| 5 |
3-5 years |
36 |
33.6% |
0.33644860 |
| 6 |
6-10 years |
17 |
15.9% |
0.15887850 |
| 7 |
11-25 years |
18 |
16.8% |
0.16822430 |
| 8 |
More than 25 years |
6 |
5.6% |
0.05607477 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.8% |
0.02803738 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8408 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr23_1
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work: Changed life situation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Changed life situation (work, situation at home, relocation, children
being older etc.)
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR20=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Changed life situation (work, situation at home, relocation, children being
older etc.) |
71 |
44.1% |
0.4409938 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8354 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
90 |
55.9% |
0.5590062 |
w03_r3fr23_2
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work: Changed interest or motivation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Changed interest or motivation
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR20=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Changed interest or motivation |
78 |
48.4% |
0.484472 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8354 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
83 |
51.6% |
0.515528 |
w03_r3fr23_3
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work: Conditions related to the
organisation or the voluntary work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR20=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work |
27 |
16.8% |
0.1677019 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8354 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
134 |
83.2% |
0.8322981 |
w03_r3fr23_4
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work: Something else, please specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Something else, please specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR20=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Something else, please specify |
32 |
19.9% |
0.1987578 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8354 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
129 |
80.1% |
0.8012422 |
w03_r3fr23_4_other
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work: Something else, please specify
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Something else, please specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR20=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr24_1
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Not enough
time
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider
stopping doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Not enough time
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not enough time |
37 |
52.1% |
0.5211268 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8444 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
34 |
47.9% |
0.4788732 |
w03_r3fr24_2
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Moving away
from the area
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider
stopping doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Moving away from the area
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Moving away from the area |
9 |
12.7% |
0.1267606 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8444 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
62 |
87.3% |
0.8732394 |
w03_r3fr24_3
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Children
stopping doing the activities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider
stopping doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Children stopping doing the activities
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Children stopping doing the activities |
14 |
19.7% |
0.1971831 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8444 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
57 |
80.3% |
0.8028169 |
w03_r3fr24_4
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Children
stopping doing the activities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider
stopping doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Children stopping doing the activities
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health problems or old age |
15 |
21.1% |
0.2112676 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8444 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
56 |
78.9% |
0.7887324 |
w03_r3fr24_5
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Other,
specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider
stopping doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
9 |
12.7% |
0.1267606 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8444 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
62 |
87.3% |
0.8732394 |
w03_r3fr24_5_other
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Other,
specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider
stopping doing voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_1=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr25_1
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Want/have to spend
more time at home
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you have less time or would rather use the time on something
else?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Want/have to spend more time at home
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR24_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Want/have to spend more time at home |
20 |
54.1% |
0.5405405 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8478 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
17 |
45.9% |
0.4594595 |
w03_r3fr25_2
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Want/have to spend
more time at work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you have less time or would rather use the time on something
else?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Want/have to spend more time at work
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR24_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Want/have to spend more time at work |
18 |
48.6% |
0.4864865 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8478 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
19 |
51.4% |
0.5135135 |
w03_r3fr25_3
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Want/have to spend
more time participating in another organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you have less time or would rather use the time on something
else?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Want/have to spend more time participating in another organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR24_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Want/have to spend more time participating in another organisation |
4 |
10.8% |
0.1081081 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8478 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
33 |
89.2% |
0.8918919 |
w03_r3fr25_4
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Want/have to spend
more time at other recreational activities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you have less time or would rather use the time on something
else?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Want/have to spend more time at other recreational activities
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR24_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Want/have to spend more time at other recreational activities |
17 |
45.9% |
0.4594595 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8478 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
20 |
54.1% |
0.5405405 |
w03_r3fr25_5
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Other, specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you have less time or would rather use the time on something
else?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR24_1=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify |
2 |
5.4% |
0.05405405 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8478 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
35 |
94.6% |
0.94594595 |
w03_r3fr25_5_other
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Other, specify [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you have less time or would rather use the time on something
else?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR24_1=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr26_1
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Lost interest
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Lost interest
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lost interest |
28 |
35.9% |
0.3589744 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
50 |
64.1% |
0.6410256 |
w03_r3fr26_2
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Receiving too little
recognition
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Receiving too little recognition
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Receiving too little recognition |
8 |
10.3% |
0.1025641 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
70 |
89.7% |
0.8974359 |
w03_r3fr26_3
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Cannot do what I enjoy
doing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cannot do what I enjoy doing
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Cannot do what I enjoy doing |
6 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
72 |
92.3% |
0.92307692 |
w03_r3fr26_4
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: The activity is too
tiresome or boring
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The activity is too tiresome or boring
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The activity is too tiresome or boring |
15 |
19.2% |
0.1923077 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
63 |
80.8% |
0.8076923 |
w03_r3fr26_5
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Don’t feel it is useful
enough
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t feel it is useful enough
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Don't feel it is useful enough |
16 |
20.5% |
0.2051282 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
62 |
79.5% |
0.7948718 |
w03_r3fr26_6
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Don’t feel it is
interesting or challenging enough
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t feel it is interesting or challenging enough
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Don't feel it is interesting or challenging enough |
9 |
11.5% |
0.1153846 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
69 |
88.5% |
0.8846154 |
w03_r3fr26_7
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Given too much work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Given too much work
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Given too much work |
15 |
19.2% |
0.1923077 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
63 |
80.8% |
0.8076923 |
w03_r3fr26_8
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Given too little work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Given too little work
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-0]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Given too little work |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
78 |
100.0% |
1 |
w03_r3fr26_9
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Other, specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
17 |
21.8% |
0.2179487 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
61 |
78.2% |
0.7820513 |
w03_r3fr26_9_other
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Other, specify [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr27_1
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: The
organisation is being closed down or is not relevant any more
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The organisation is being closed down or is not relevant any more
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The organisation is being closed down or is not relevant any more |
2 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
25 |
92.6% |
0.92592593 |
w03_r3fr27_2
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Cannot do
what I enjoyed doing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cannot do what I enjoyed doing
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Cannot do what I enjoyed doing |
1 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
26 |
96.3% |
0.96296296 |
w03_r3fr27_3
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Too
bureaucratic organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Too bureaucratic organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Cannot do what I enjoyed doing |
1 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
26 |
96.3% |
0.96296296 |
w03_r3fr27_4
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Not
structured enough
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Not structured enough
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not structured enough |
14 |
51.9% |
0.5185185 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
13 |
48.1% |
0.4814815 |
w03_r3fr27_5
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Too much
responsibility on too few people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Too much responsibility on too few people
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Too much responsibility on too few people |
9 |
33.3% |
0.3333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
18 |
66.7% |
0.6666667 |
w03_r3fr27_6
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Not good
enough training or guidance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Not good enough training or guidance
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not good enough training or guidance |
1 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
26 |
96.3% |
0.96296296 |
w03_r3fr27_7
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Conflicts
with employees
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Conflicts with employees
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Conflicts with employees |
2 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
25 |
92.6% |
0.92592593 |
w03_r3fr27_8
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Conflicts
with other volunteers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Conflicts with other volunteers
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Conflicts with other volunteers |
6 |
22.2% |
0.2222222 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
21 |
77.8% |
0.7777778 |
w03_r3fr27_9
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Poor social
environment
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Poor social environment
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Poor social environment |
4 |
14.8% |
0.1481481 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
23 |
85.2% |
0.8518519 |
w03_r3fr27_10
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Receiving too
little recognition
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Receiving too little recognition
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Poor social environment |
3 |
11.1% |
0.1111111 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
24 |
88.9% |
0.8888889 |
w03_r3fr27_11
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Is too
tiresome or boring
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is too tiresome or boring
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Is too tiresome or boring |
4 |
14.8% |
0.1481481 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
23 |
85.2% |
0.8518519 |
w03_r3fr27_12
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Is too
expensive
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is too expensive
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Is too expensive |
1 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
26 |
96.3% |
0.96296296 |
w03_r3fr27_13
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: The voluntary
work was a one-time occurrence
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The voluntary work was a one-time occurrence
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The voluntary work was a one-time occurrence |
1 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
26 |
96.3% |
0.96296296 |
w03_r3fr27_14
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Other,
specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
4 |
14.8% |
0.1481481 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
23 |
85.2% |
0.8518519 |
w03_r3fr27_14_other
|
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Other,
specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making
you consider stopping?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr28
|
Variable label:
|
Opportunities to participate in voluntary work in local neighbourhood
|
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad do you think the opportunities are to participate in
voluntary work in your local neighbourhood?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran2=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
253 |
30.0% |
0.300475059 |
| 2 |
Good |
260 |
30.9% |
0.308788599 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
97 |
11.5% |
0.115201900 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
148 |
17.6% |
0.175771971 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
30 |
3.6% |
0.035629454 |
| 6 |
Bad |
22 |
2.6% |
0.026128266 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
3.0% |
0.029691211 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr29
|
Variable label:
|
Parents active within associations and organisations
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you think back to your childhood, to what extent were your parents
active within associations and organisations?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
149 |
8.8% |
0.08759553 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
320 |
18.8% |
0.18812463 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
520 |
30.6% |
0.30570253 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
436 |
25.6% |
0.25631981 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
225 |
13.2% |
0.13227513 |
| 97 |
No answer |
51 |
3.0% |
0.02998236 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr30_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: In my local neighbourhood most people participate with
voluntary work when it is needed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
In my local neighbourhood most people participate with voluntary work
when it is needed
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
57 |
3.4% |
0.03350970 |
| 2 |
Agree |
327 |
19.2% |
0.19223986 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
425 |
25.0% |
0.24985303 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
412 |
24.2% |
0.24221046 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
209 |
12.3% |
0.12286890 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
160 |
9.4% |
0.09406232 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
30 |
1.8% |
0.01763668 |
| 97 |
No answer |
81 |
4.8% |
0.04761905 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr30_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Voluntary work makes little contribution to solving problems
in society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Voluntary work makes little contribution to solving problems in society
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
52 |
3.1% |
0.03057025 |
| 2 |
Agree |
192 |
11.3% |
0.11287478 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
245 |
14.4% |
0.14403292 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
243 |
14.3% |
0.14285714 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
316 |
18.6% |
0.18577307 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
443 |
26.0% |
0.26043504 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
127 |
7.5% |
0.07466196 |
| 97 |
No answer |
83 |
4.9% |
0.04879483 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr30_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Voluntary work interests me to a small extent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Voluntary work interests me to a small extent
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01116990 |
| 2 |
Agree |
102 |
6.0% |
0.05996473 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
159 |
9.3% |
0.09347443 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
319 |
18.8% |
0.18753674 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
359 |
21.1% |
0.21105232 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
499 |
29.3% |
0.29335685 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
157 |
9.2% |
0.09229865 |
| 97 |
No answer |
87 |
5.1% |
0.05114638 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr30_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: I want to do more voluntary work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I want to do more voluntary work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
56 |
3.3% |
0.03292181 |
| 2 |
Agree |
290 |
17.0% |
0.17048795 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
396 |
23.3% |
0.23280423 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
486 |
28.6% |
0.28571429 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
160 |
9.4% |
0.09406232 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
170 |
10.0% |
0.09994121 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
52 |
3.1% |
0.03057025 |
| 97 |
No answer |
91 |
5.3% |
0.05349794 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_1
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Satisfying
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Satisfying
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
171 |
10.1% |
0.100529101 |
| 2 |
Well |
623 |
36.6% |
0.366255144 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
397 |
23.3% |
0.233392122 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
244 |
14.3% |
0.143445032 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
26 |
1.5% |
0.015285126 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
15 |
0.9% |
0.008818342 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
| 97 |
No answer |
216 |
12.7% |
0.126984127 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_2
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Rewarding
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Rewarding
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
260 |
15.3% |
0.152851264 |
| 2 |
Well |
710 |
41.7% |
0.417401529 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
358 |
21.0% |
0.210464433 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
141 |
8.3% |
0.082892416 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
18 |
1.1% |
0.010582011 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
| 97 |
No answer |
196 |
11.5% |
0.115226337 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_3
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Exciting
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Exciting
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
128 |
7.5% |
0.075249853 |
| 2 |
Well |
453 |
26.6% |
0.266313933 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
425 |
25.0% |
0.249853028 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
363 |
21.3% |
0.213403880 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
81 |
4.8% |
0.047619048 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
25 |
1.5% |
0.014697237 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
15 |
0.9% |
0.008818342 |
| 97 |
No answer |
211 |
12.4% |
0.124044680 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_4
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Important
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
402 |
23.6% |
0.236331570 |
| 2 |
Well |
676 |
39.7% |
0.397413286 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
281 |
16.5% |
0.165196943 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
119 |
7.0% |
0.069958848 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
19 |
1.1% |
0.011169900 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003527337 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
| 97 |
No answer |
189 |
11.1% |
0.111111111 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_5
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Fun
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fun
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
119 |
7.0% |
0.069958848 |
| 2 |
Well |
480 |
28.2% |
0.282186949 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
474 |
27.9% |
0.278659612 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
337 |
19.8% |
0.198118754 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
54 |
3.2% |
0.031746032 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
20 |
1.2% |
0.011757790 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005878895 |
| 97 |
No answer |
207 |
12.2% |
0.121693122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_6
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Challenging
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Challenging
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
142 |
8.3% |
0.08348031 |
| 2 |
Well |
498 |
29.3% |
0.29276896 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
417 |
24.5% |
0.24514991 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
321 |
18.9% |
0.18871252 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
69 |
4.1% |
0.04056437 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
25 |
1.5% |
0.01469724 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
18 |
1.1% |
0.01058201 |
| 97 |
No answer |
211 |
12.4% |
0.12404468 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_7
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Disappointing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Disappointing
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005878895 |
| 2 |
Well |
40 |
2.4% |
0.023515579 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
82 |
4.8% |
0.048206937 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
436 |
25.6% |
0.256319812 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
279 |
16.4% |
0.164021164 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
436 |
25.6% |
0.256319812 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
175 |
10.3% |
0.102880658 |
| 97 |
No answer |
243 |
14.3% |
0.142857143 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_8
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Emotionally exhausting
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Emotionally exhausting
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01116990 |
| 2 |
Well |
68 |
4.0% |
0.03997648 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
190 |
11.2% |
0.11169900 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
472 |
27.7% |
0.27748383 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
192 |
11.3% |
0.11287478 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
355 |
20.9% |
0.20870076 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
171 |
10.1% |
0.10052910 |
| 97 |
No answer |
234 |
13.8% |
0.13756614 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_9
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Physically tiring
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Physically tiring
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
17 |
1.0% |
0.009994121 |
| 2 |
Well |
102 |
6.0% |
0.059964727 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
242 |
14.2% |
0.142269253 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
489 |
28.7% |
0.287477954 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
187 |
11.0% |
0.109935332 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
306 |
18.0% |
0.179894180 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
128 |
7.5% |
0.075249853 |
| 97 |
No answer |
230 |
13.5% |
0.135214580 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_10
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Frustrating
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Frustrating
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008230453 |
| 2 |
Well |
78 |
4.6% |
0.045855379 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
206 |
12.1% |
0.121105232 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
418 |
24.6% |
0.245737801 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
221 |
13.0% |
0.129923574 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
356 |
20.9% |
0.209288654 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
159 |
9.3% |
0.093474427 |
| 97 |
No answer |
249 |
14.6% |
0.146384480 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_11
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Depressing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Depressing
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004115226 |
| 2 |
Well |
29 |
1.7% |
0.017048795 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
65 |
3.8% |
0.038212816 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
349 |
20.5% |
0.205173427 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
192 |
11.3% |
0.112874780 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
438 |
25.7% |
0.257495591 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
372 |
21.9% |
0.218694885 |
| 97 |
No answer |
249 |
14.6% |
0.146384480 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_12
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Time consuming
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Time consuming
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
149 |
8.8% |
0.08759553 |
| 2 |
Well |
419 |
24.6% |
0.24632569 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
400 |
23.5% |
0.23515579 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
306 |
18.0% |
0.17989418 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
88 |
5.2% |
0.05173427 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
91 |
5.3% |
0.05349794 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
38 |
2.2% |
0.02233980 |
| 97 |
No answer |
210 |
12.3% |
0.12345679 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_13
|
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Easy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do
you think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Easy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
37 |
2.2% |
0.02175191 |
| 2 |
Well |
207 |
12.2% |
0.12169312 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
285 |
16.8% |
0.16754850 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
660 |
38.8% |
0.38800705 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
151 |
8.9% |
0.08877131 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
97 |
5.7% |
0.05702528 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
25 |
1.5% |
0.01469724 |
| 97 |
No answer |
239 |
14.1% |
0.14050558 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr32
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with life
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you satisfied with life at the moment?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
295 |
17.3% |
0.173427396 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
909 |
53.4% |
0.534391534 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
357 |
21.0% |
0.209876543 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
74 |
4.4% |
0.043503821 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006466784 |
| 97 |
No answer |
55 |
3.2% |
0.032333921 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr33
|
Variable label:
|
How meaningful life is
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, to what extent do you think that what you are doing in life
is meaningful?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
268 |
15.8% |
0.157554380 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
834 |
49.0% |
0.490299824 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
422 |
24.8% |
0.248089359 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
78 |
4.6% |
0.045855379 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008230453 |
| 97 |
No answer |
85 |
5.0% |
0.049970606 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr34_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings on a scale from 0 to 10: Happy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale from 0-10, yesterday to what extent were you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Happy
|
|
Technical description:
|
0 means that you did not feel it at all yesterday, while 10 means
that you felt it all the time.
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - not at all |
24 |
1.4% |
0.01410935 |
| 2 |
1 |
30 |
1.8% |
0.01763668 |
| 3 |
2 |
53 |
3.1% |
0.03115814 |
| 4 |
3 |
77 |
4.5% |
0.04526749 |
| 5 |
4 |
79 |
4.6% |
0.04644327 |
| 6 |
5 |
199 |
11.7% |
0.11699001 |
| 7 |
6 |
232 |
13.6% |
0.13639036 |
| 8 |
7 |
323 |
19.0% |
0.18988830 |
| 9 |
8 |
363 |
21.3% |
0.21340388 |
| 10 |
9 |
150 |
8.8% |
0.08818342 |
| 11 |
10 - all the time |
78 |
4.6% |
0.04585538 |
| 97 |
No answer |
93 |
5.5% |
0.05467372 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr34_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings on a scale from 0 to 10: Worried
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale from 0-10, yesterday to what extent were you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Worried
|
|
Technical description:
|
0 means that you did not feel it at all yesterday, while 10 means
that you felt it all the time.
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - not at all |
214 |
12.6% |
0.12580835 |
| 2 |
1 |
201 |
11.8% |
0.11816578 |
| 3 |
2 |
252 |
14.8% |
0.14814815 |
| 4 |
3 |
188 |
11.1% |
0.11052322 |
| 5 |
4 |
168 |
9.9% |
0.09876543 |
| 6 |
5 |
183 |
10.8% |
0.10758377 |
| 7 |
6 |
136 |
8.0% |
0.07995297 |
| 8 |
7 |
88 |
5.2% |
0.05173427 |
| 9 |
8 |
77 |
4.5% |
0.04526749 |
| 10 |
9 |
33 |
1.9% |
0.01940035 |
| 11 |
10 - all the time |
23 |
1.4% |
0.01352146 |
| 97 |
No answer |
138 |
8.1% |
0.08112875 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr34_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings on a scale from 0 to 10: Depressed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale from 0-10, yesterday to what extent were you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Depressed
|
|
Technical description:
|
0 means that you did not feel it at all yesterday, while 10 means
that you felt it all the time.
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - not at all |
823 |
48.4% |
0.483833039 |
| 2 |
1 |
223 |
13.1% |
0.131099353 |
| 3 |
2 |
144 |
8.5% |
0.084656085 |
| 4 |
3 |
97 |
5.7% |
0.057025279 |
| 5 |
4 |
64 |
3.8% |
0.037624927 |
| 6 |
5 |
59 |
3.5% |
0.034685479 |
| 7 |
6 |
43 |
2.5% |
0.025279248 |
| 8 |
7 |
46 |
2.7% |
0.027042916 |
| 9 |
8 |
24 |
1.4% |
0.014109347 |
| 10 |
9 |
13 |
0.8% |
0.007642563 |
| 11 |
10 - all the time |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008230453 |
| 97 |
No answer |
151 |
8.9% |
0.088771311 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr35_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: In most ways my life is close to ideal
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about
your life:
|
|
Literal question:
|
In most ways my life is close to ideal
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
82 |
4.8% |
0.04820694 |
| 2 |
Agree |
437 |
25.7% |
0.25690770 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
500 |
29.4% |
0.29394474 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
247 |
14.5% |
0.14520870 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
161 |
9.5% |
0.09465021 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
129 |
7.6% |
0.07583774 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
53 |
3.1% |
0.03115814 |
| 97 |
No answer |
92 |
5.4% |
0.05408583 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr35_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: My circumstances are excellent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about
your life:
|
|
Literal question:
|
My circumstances are excellent
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
151 |
8.9% |
0.08877131 |
| 2 |
Agree |
586 |
34.5% |
0.34450323 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
397 |
23.3% |
0.23339212 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
188 |
11.1% |
0.11052322 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
147 |
8.6% |
0.08641975 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
99 |
5.8% |
0.05820106 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
1.8% |
0.01822457 |
| 97 |
No answer |
102 |
6.0% |
0.05996473 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr35_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: So far I have got what I most wanted in life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about
your life:
|
|
Literal question:
|
So far I have got what I most wanted in life
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
200 |
11.8% |
0.11757790 |
| 2 |
Agree |
619 |
36.4% |
0.36390359 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
357 |
21.0% |
0.20987654 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
156 |
9.2% |
0.09171076 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
127 |
7.5% |
0.07466196 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
107 |
6.3% |
0.06290417 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
41 |
2.4% |
0.02410347 |
| 97 |
No answer |
94 |
5.5% |
0.05526161 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr35_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: So far I have got what I most wanted in life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about
your life:
|
|
Literal question:
|
So far I have got what I most wanted in life
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
255 |
15.0% |
0.14991182 |
| 2 |
Agree |
757 |
44.5% |
0.44503233 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
307 |
18.0% |
0.18048207 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
97 |
5.7% |
0.05702528 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
106 |
6.2% |
0.06231628 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
61 |
3.6% |
0.03586126 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01646091 |
| 97 |
No answer |
90 |
5.3% |
0.05291005 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr35_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: If I could relive my life, I would not really change anything
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about
your life:
|
|
Literal question:
|
If I could relive my life, I would not really change anything
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
78 |
4.6% |
0.04585538 |
| 2 |
Agree |
265 |
15.6% |
0.15579071 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
346 |
20.3% |
0.20340976 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
182 |
10.7% |
0.10699588 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
327 |
19.2% |
0.19223986 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
261 |
15.3% |
0.15343915 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
147 |
8.6% |
0.08641975 |
| 97 |
No answer |
95 |
5.6% |
0.05584950 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_1
|
Variable label:
|
Happy with: Your standard of living?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your standard of living?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very happy |
416 |
24.5% |
0.24456202 |
| 2 |
Happy |
909 |
53.4% |
0.53439153 |
| 3 |
Somewhat happy |
234 |
13.8% |
0.13756614 |
| 4 |
Slightly happy |
54 |
3.2% |
0.03174603 |
| 5 |
Not happy at all |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
67 |
3.9% |
0.03938859 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_2
|
Variable label:
|
Happy with: Your health?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your health?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very happy |
329 |
19.3% |
0.19341564 |
| 2 |
Happy |
725 |
42.6% |
0.42621987 |
| 3 |
Somewhat happy |
345 |
20.3% |
0.20282187 |
| 4 |
Slightly happy |
159 |
9.3% |
0.09347443 |
| 5 |
Not happy at all |
74 |
4.4% |
0.04350382 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
69 |
4.1% |
0.04056437 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_3
|
Variable label:
|
Happy with: What you are achieving in life?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
What you are achieving in life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very happy |
187 |
11.0% |
0.10993533 |
| 2 |
Happy |
824 |
48.4% |
0.48442093 |
| 3 |
Somewhat happy |
466 |
27.4% |
0.27395650 |
| 4 |
Slightly happy |
110 |
6.5% |
0.06466784 |
| 5 |
Not happy at all |
26 |
1.5% |
0.01528513 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
88 |
5.2% |
0.05173427 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_4
|
Variable label:
|
Happy with: Your personal relationships?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your personal relationships?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very happy |
268 |
15.8% |
0.15755438 |
| 2 |
Happy |
819 |
48.1% |
0.48148148 |
| 3 |
Somewhat happy |
397 |
23.3% |
0.23339212 |
| 4 |
Slightly happy |
98 |
5.8% |
0.05761317 |
| 5 |
Not happy at all |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01646091 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
91 |
5.3% |
0.05349794 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_5
|
Variable label:
|
Happy with: How safe you feel?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
How safe you feel?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very happy |
431 |
25.3% |
0.25338036 |
| 2 |
Happy |
892 |
52.4% |
0.52439741 |
| 3 |
Somewhat happy |
214 |
12.6% |
0.12580835 |
| 4 |
Slightly happy |
71 |
4.2% |
0.04174015 |
| 5 |
Not happy at all |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01116990 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
74 |
4.4% |
0.04350382 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_6
|
Variable label:
|
Happy with: The feeling of being part of a neighbourhood community?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The feeling of being part of a neighbourhood community?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very happy |
139 |
8.2% |
0.081716637 |
| 2 |
Happy |
619 |
36.4% |
0.363903586 |
| 3 |
Somewhat happy |
538 |
31.6% |
0.316284539 |
| 4 |
Slightly happy |
225 |
13.2% |
0.132275132 |
| 5 |
Not happy at all |
67 |
3.9% |
0.039388595 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006466784 |
| 97 |
No answer |
102 |
6.0% |
0.059964727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_7
|
Variable label:
|
Happy with: The prospects for safety in the future?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The prospects for safety in the future?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very happy |
229 |
13.5% |
0.13462669 |
| 2 |
Happy |
828 |
48.7% |
0.48677249 |
| 3 |
Somewhat happy |
382 |
22.5% |
0.22457378 |
| 4 |
Slightly happy |
139 |
8.2% |
0.08171664 |
| 5 |
Not happy at all |
41 |
2.4% |
0.02410347 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
82 |
4.8% |
0.04820694 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_8
|
Variable label:
|
Happy with: The amount of time you have to do the things you like to do?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The amount of time you have to do the things you like to do?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very happy |
145 |
8.5% |
0.08524397 |
| 2 |
Happy |
652 |
38.3% |
0.38330394 |
| 3 |
Somewhat happy |
479 |
28.2% |
0.28159906 |
| 4 |
Slightly happy |
273 |
16.0% |
0.16049383 |
| 5 |
Not happy at all |
77 |
4.5% |
0.04526749 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
75 |
4.4% |
0.04409171 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_9
|
Variable label:
|
Happy with: The quality of nature and the environment in your local
area?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The quality of nature and the environment in your local area?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very happy |
588 |
34.6% |
0.345679012 |
| 2 |
Happy |
780 |
45.9% |
0.458553792 |
| 3 |
Somewhat happy |
202 |
11.9% |
0.118753674 |
| 4 |
Slightly happy |
44 |
2.6% |
0.025867137 |
| 5 |
Not happy at all |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005878895 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
77 |
4.5% |
0.045267490 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_10
|
Variable label:
|
Happy with: Your job?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your job?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very happy |
274 |
16.1% |
0.16108172 |
| 2 |
Happy |
615 |
36.2% |
0.36155203 |
| 3 |
Somewhat happy |
239 |
14.1% |
0.14050558 |
| 4 |
Slightly happy |
91 |
5.3% |
0.05349794 |
| 5 |
Not happy at all |
49 |
2.9% |
0.02880658 |
| 6 |
Not relevant |
332 |
19.5% |
0.19517931 |
| 97 |
No answer |
101 |
5.9% |
0.05937684 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr37
|
Variable label:
|
Life situation in five years’ time
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about your life situation in five years’ time, do you think
it will be …
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Worse than it is at the moment |
114 |
6.7% |
0.06701940 |
| 2 |
Similar to how it is now |
950 |
55.8% |
0.55849500 |
| 3 |
Better than it is at the moment |
575 |
33.8% |
0.33803645 |
| 97 |
No answer |
62 |
3.6% |
0.03644915 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_ran5
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1711] [Invalid:6804]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
888 |
51.9% |
0.5189947 |
| 2 |
2 |
823 |
48.1% |
0.4810053 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6804 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km1
|
Variable label:
|
Text: What do you think when you hear or read the word “climate change”?
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we are going to ask some questions about climate and the
environment.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the word “climate change”?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers, a couple of sentences would be nice, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
[Asked if U=2 and ran5=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3km2
|
Variable label:
|
Text: What do you think when you hear or read the words “global
warming”? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the words “global warming”?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers, a couple of sentences would be nice, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
[Asked if U=2 and ran5=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3km22
|
Variable label:
|
Possible to prevent harmful climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s now assume that climate change can be a major problem for the
world in the future if nothing is done about it. To what extent do you
think it is possible to do something to prevent harmful climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Choose the statement that best matches your viewpoint:
[Asked if u=2 or if the respondent has answered w01_km7 (panel effect)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It is not possible to do something to prevent harmful climate change. |
189 |
4.8% |
0.047884469 |
| 2 |
It is possible, but very difficult, to do something to prevent harmful climate
change. |
2140 |
54.2% |
0.542183937 |
| 3 |
It is possible and entirely realistic to do something to prevent harmful climate
change. |
1476 |
37.4% |
0.373954902 |
| 4 |
It is easy to prevent harmful climate change. |
27 |
0.7% |
0.006840638 |
| 97 |
No answer |
115 |
2.9% |
0.029136053 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4568 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_r3km20
|
Variable label:
|
Statement that best describes own viewpoint on climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following statements best describes
your viewpoint on climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Select one of the alternatives.
[Asked if u=2 or if the respondent has answered w01_km7 (panel effect)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think that the climate is not changing. |
21 |
0.5% |
0.005160973 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
238 |
5.8% |
0.058491030 |
| 3 |
I think that the climate is changing, but it is only to a small extent linked to
human influences. |
1003 |
24.6% |
0.246497911 |
| 4 |
I think that the climate is changing, and that it is largely a result of human
influences. |
2654 |
65.2% |
0.652248710 |
| 97 |
No answer |
153 |
3.8% |
0.037601376 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4446 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km25
|
Variable label:
|
Overall, how serious a threat is climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Overall, how serious a threat is climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
527 |
30.7% |
0.30657359 |
| 2 |
Serious |
705 |
41.0% |
0.41012216 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
365 |
21.2% |
0.21233275 |
| 4 |
Slightly serious |
68 |
4.0% |
0.03955788 |
| 5 |
Not a threat |
26 |
1.5% |
0.01512507 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01628854 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_r3km26
|
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat is climate change for you personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change for you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very serious |
120 |
7.0% |
0.06980803 |
| 2 |
Serious |
387 |
22.5% |
0.22513089 |
| 3 |
Somewhat serious |
576 |
33.5% |
0.33507853 |
| 4 |
Slightly serious |
423 |
24.6% |
0.24607330 |
| 5 |
Not a threat |
159 |
9.2% |
0.09249564 |
| 97 |
No answer |
54 |
3.1% |
0.03141361 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km27
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do we follow the Constitution regarding environmental
protection
|
|
Literal question:
|
Since 1992 the Constitution of Norway has contained the following
provision: “Every person has the right to an environment that is
conducive to health and to a natural environment whose productivity and
diversity are maintained. Natural resources shall be managed on the
basis of comprehensive long-term considerations which will safeguard
this right for future generations as well.” To what extent do you think
current Norwegian policies meet the aims of this provision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01628854 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
291 |
16.9% |
0.16928447 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
927 |
53.9% |
0.53926702 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
378 |
22.0% |
0.21989529 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
52 |
3.0% |
0.03025015 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
2.5% |
0.02501454 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km28_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Humans will eventually find out enough about how nature works
to be able to control it.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Humans will eventually find out enough about how nature works to be able
to control it.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01105294 |
| 2 |
Agree |
134 |
7.8% |
0.07795230 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
272 |
15.8% |
0.15823153 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
301 |
17.5% |
0.17510180 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
234 |
13.6% |
0.13612565 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
399 |
23.2% |
0.23211169 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
272 |
15.8% |
0.15823153 |
| 97 |
No answer |
88 |
5.1% |
0.05119255 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km28_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: All ecological systems, regardless of how small and
insignificant they are, have the right to exist.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
All ecological systems, regardless of how small and insignificant they
are, have the right to exist.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
477 |
27.7% |
0.27748691 |
| 2 |
Agree |
605 |
35.2% |
0.35194881 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
288 |
16.8% |
0.16753927 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
149 |
8.7% |
0.08667830 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
77 |
4.5% |
0.04479348 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
53 |
3.1% |
0.03083188 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00814427 |
| 97 |
No answer |
56 |
3.3% |
0.03257708 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km28_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Nature primarily has value when it can be utilised to satisfy
humans’ material needs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nature primarily has value when it can be utilised to satisfy humans’
material needs.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
1.7% |
0.01687027 |
| 2 |
Agree |
72 |
4.2% |
0.04188482 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
118 |
6.9% |
0.06864456 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
136 |
7.9% |
0.07911576 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
190 |
11.1% |
0.11052938 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
529 |
30.8% |
0.30773706 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
560 |
32.6% |
0.32577080 |
| 97 |
No answer |
85 |
4.9% |
0.04944735 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km29
|
Variable label:
|
How broad is the diversity of opinions on climate change that is
conveyed by the media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How broad is the diversity of opinions on climate change that is
conveyed by the media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very broad diversity |
30 |
1.7% |
0.01745201 |
| 2 |
Broad diversity |
351 |
20.4% |
0.20418848 |
| 3 |
Some diversity |
782 |
45.5% |
0.45491565 |
| 4 |
Little diversity |
441 |
25.7% |
0.25654450 |
| 5 |
No diversity at all |
35 |
2.0% |
0.02036067 |
| 97 |
No answer |
80 |
4.7% |
0.04653869 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km30
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you see it as a moral duty for the individual to
contribute to preventing climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you see it as a moral duty for the individual to
contribute to preventing climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
335 |
19.5% |
0.194880745 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
763 |
44.4% |
0.443862711 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
456 |
26.5% |
0.265270506 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
97 |
5.6% |
0.056428156 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009307737 |
| 97 |
No answer |
52 |
3.0% |
0.030250145 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Hope
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hope
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not
at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
73 |
4.2% |
0.04246655 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
247 |
14.4% |
0.14368819 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
869 |
50.6% |
0.50552647 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
375 |
21.8% |
0.21815009 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
53 |
3.1% |
0.03083188 |
| 97 |
No answer |
102 |
5.9% |
0.05933682 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Worry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Worry
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not
at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
241 |
14.0% |
0.14019779 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
461 |
26.8% |
0.26817917 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
677 |
39.4% |
0.39383362 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
199 |
11.6% |
0.11576498 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
44 |
2.6% |
0.02559628 |
| 97 |
No answer |
97 |
5.6% |
0.05642816 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Gloom
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gloom
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not
at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
248 |
14.4% |
0.14426992 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
421 |
24.5% |
0.24490983 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
650 |
37.8% |
0.37812682 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
235 |
13.7% |
0.13670739 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
66 |
3.8% |
0.03839442 |
| 97 |
No answer |
99 |
5.8% |
0.05759162 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_4
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not
at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
375 |
21.8% |
0.21815009 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
542 |
31.5% |
0.31529959 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
518 |
30.1% |
0.30133799 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
137 |
8.0% |
0.07969750 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
36 |
2.1% |
0.02094241 |
| 97 |
No answer |
111 |
6.5% |
0.06457243 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_5
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Guilt
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Guilt
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not
at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
274 |
15.9% |
0.15939500 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
595 |
34.6% |
0.34613147 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
646 |
37.6% |
0.37579988 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
92 |
5.4% |
0.05351949 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00814427 |
| 97 |
No answer |
98 |
5.7% |
0.05700989 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_6
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Interest
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Interest
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not
at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
39 |
2.3% |
0.02268761 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
122 |
7.1% |
0.07097150 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
755 |
43.9% |
0.43920884 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
610 |
35.5% |
0.35485748 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
97 |
5.6% |
0.05642816 |
| 97 |
No answer |
96 |
5.6% |
0.05584642 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_7
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Sympathy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sympathy
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not
at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
137 |
8.0% |
0.07969750 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
262 |
15.2% |
0.15241419 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
743 |
43.2% |
0.43222804 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
395 |
23.0% |
0.22978476 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
61 |
3.5% |
0.03548575 |
| 97 |
No answer |
121 |
7.0% |
0.07038976 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_8
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Tired of it
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it,
how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tired of it
|
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not
at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
443 |
25.8% |
0.25770797 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
517 |
30.1% |
0.30075625 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
497 |
28.9% |
0.28912158 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
118 |
6.9% |
0.06864456 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
38 |
2.2% |
0.02210588 |
| 97 |
No answer |
106 |
6.2% |
0.06166376 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_ran6
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1696] [Invalid:6819]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
851 |
50.2% |
0.5017689 |
| 2 |
2 |
845 |
49.8% |
0.4982311 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6819 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km32
|
Variable label:
|
Right or wrong not conduct an impact assessment study on the oil
activities outside Lofoten and Vesterålen: Possible job creation
|
|
Literal question:
|
One argument for oil activities outside Lofoten and Vesterålen is that
they will create more new jobs in North Norway. Following the election,
the Solberg government decided that it will not conduct an impact
assessment study on the oil activities outside Lofoten and Vesterålen
over the next four years. As you see it, was this a good or a bad
decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran6=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
150 |
17.6% |
0.17626322 |
| 2 |
Good |
227 |
26.7% |
0.26674501 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
79 |
9.3% |
0.09283196 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
155 |
18.2% |
0.18213866 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
90 |
10.6% |
0.10575793 |
| 6 |
Bad |
88 |
10.3% |
0.10340776 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
36 |
4.2% |
0.04230317 |
| 97 |
No answer |
26 |
3.1% |
0.03055229 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7664 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km33
|
Variable label:
|
Right or wrong not conduct an impact assessment study on the oil
activities outside Lofoten and Vesterålen: Increased emissions, endanger
fishing
|
|
Literal question:
|
One argument against the oil activities outside Lofoten and Vesterålen
is that they will increase greenhouse gas emissions and be a danger to
the fish. Following the election, the Solberg government decided that it
will not conduct an impact assessment study on the oil activities
outside Lofoten and Vesterålen over the next four years. As you see it,
was this a good or a bad decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran6=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
168 |
19.9% |
0.19881657 |
| 2 |
Good |
212 |
25.1% |
0.25088757 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
75 |
8.9% |
0.08875740 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
143 |
16.9% |
0.16923077 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
83 |
9.8% |
0.09822485 |
| 6 |
Bad |
84 |
9.9% |
0.09940828 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
53 |
6.3% |
0.06272189 |
| 97 |
No answer |
27 |
3.2% |
0.03195266 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7670 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km36
|
Variable label:
|
Largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the world? [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, what is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in
the world?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_ran7
|
Variable label:
|
ran7
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1693] [Invalid:6822]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
841 |
49.7% |
0.4967513 |
| 2 |
2 |
852 |
50.3% |
0.5032487 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6822 |
|
NA |
w03_ran7a
|
Variable label:
|
ran7a
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:841] [Invalid:7674]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
425 |
50.5% |
0.5053508 |
| 2 |
2 |
416 |
49.5% |
0.4946492 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7674 |
|
NA |
w03_ran7b
|
Variable label:
|
ran7b
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:852] [Invalid:7663]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
415 |
48.7% |
0.4870892 |
| 2 |
2 |
437 |
51.3% |
0.5129108 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7663 |
|
NA |
w03_klimamulti_1
|
Variable label:
|
1 (klimamulti)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Result of randomization (see R3K37_1 through 4). Selects R3KM37_1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1693] [Invalid:6822]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
841 |
49.7% |
0.4967513 |
| 0 |
|
852 |
50.3% |
0.5032487 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6822 |
|
NA |
w03_klimamulti_2
|
Variable label:
|
2 (klimamulti)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Result of randomization (see R3K37_1 through 4). Selects R3KM37_2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1693] [Invalid:6822]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
852 |
50.3% |
0.5032487 |
| 0 |
|
841 |
49.7% |
0.4967513 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6822 |
|
NA |
w03_klimamulti_3
|
Variable label:
|
3 (klimamulti)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Result of randomization (see R3K37_1 through 4). Selects R3KM37_3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1693] [Invalid:6822]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
840 |
49.6% |
0.4961607 |
| 0 |
|
853 |
50.4% |
0.5038393 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6822 |
|
NA |
w03_klimamulti_4
|
Variable label:
|
4 (klimamulti)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Result of randomization (see R3K37_1 through 4). Selects R3KM37_4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1693] [Invalid:6822]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
853 |
50.4% |
0.5038393 |
| 0 |
|
840 |
49.6% |
0.4961607 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6822 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km37_1
|
Variable label:
|
Measures against climate change: Increased government support for
developing wind power on land
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts think that the
measures mentioned below will work, while others think that these are
not good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you to the
following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increased government support for developing wind power on land.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[R3KM37_1 through 4 are randomized, with the following possible
combinations: R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_3, R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_4, R3KM37_2
& R3KM37_3, R3KM37_2 & R3KM37_4. Not R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_2 or
R3KM37_3 & R3KM37_4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very negative |
40 |
4.8% |
0.04756243 |
| 2 |
Negative |
55 |
6.5% |
0.06539834 |
| 3 |
Somewhat negative |
47 |
5.6% |
0.05588585 |
| 4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
96 |
11.4% |
0.11414982 |
| 5 |
Somewhat positive |
179 |
21.3% |
0.21284185 |
| 6 |
Positive |
283 |
33.7% |
0.33650416 |
| 7 |
Very positive |
115 |
13.7% |
0.13674197 |
| 97 |
No answer |
26 |
3.1% |
0.03091558 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7674 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km37_2
|
Variable label:
|
Measures against climate change: Increased government support for
developing wind power at sea
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts think that the
measures mentioned below will work, while others think that these are
not good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you to the
following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increased government support for developing wind power at sea (offshore
wind power).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[R3KM37_1 through 4 are randomized, with the following possible
combinations: R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_3, R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_4, R3KM37_2
& R3KM37_3, R3KM37_2 & R3KM37_4. Not R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_2 or
R3KM37_3 & R3KM37_4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very negative |
20 |
2.3% |
0.02347418 |
| 2 |
Negative |
27 |
3.2% |
0.03169014 |
| 3 |
Somewhat negative |
42 |
4.9% |
0.04929577 |
| 4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
78 |
9.2% |
0.09154930 |
| 5 |
Somewhat positive |
191 |
22.4% |
0.22417840 |
| 6 |
Positive |
336 |
39.4% |
0.39436620 |
| 7 |
Very positive |
140 |
16.4% |
0.16431925 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02112676 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7663 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km37_3
|
Variable label:
|
Measures against climate change: Increased government support for
developing biofuel plants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts think that the
measures mentioned below will work, while others think that these are
not good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you to the
following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increased government support for developing biofuel plants (e.g. wood,
pellets and biogas).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[R3KM37_1 through 4 are randomized, with the following possible
combinations: R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_3, R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_4, R3KM37_2
& R3KM37_3, R3KM37_2 & R3KM37_4. Not R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_2 or
R3KM37_3 & R3KM37_4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very negative |
23 |
2.7% |
0.02738095 |
| 2 |
Negative |
24 |
2.9% |
0.02857143 |
| 3 |
Somewhat negative |
57 |
6.8% |
0.06785714 |
| 4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
158 |
18.8% |
0.18809524 |
| 5 |
Somewhat positive |
243 |
28.9% |
0.28928571 |
| 6 |
Positive |
229 |
27.3% |
0.27261905 |
| 7 |
Very positive |
76 |
9.0% |
0.09047619 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7675 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km37_4
|
Variable label:
|
Measures against climate change: Increased government support for
developing geothermal energy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have
been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts think that the
measures mentioned below will work, while others think that these are
not good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you to the
following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increased government support for developing geothermal energy where one
drills down to the geothermal energy under the Earth’s surface.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[R3KM37_1 through 4 are randomized, with the following possible
combinations: R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_3, R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_4, R3KM37_2
& R3KM37_3, R3KM37_2 & R3KM37_4. Not R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_2 or
R3KM37_3 & R3KM37_4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very negative |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008206331 |
| 2 |
Negative |
23 |
2.7% |
0.026963658 |
| 3 |
Somewhat negative |
10 |
1.2% |
0.011723329 |
| 4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
147 |
17.2% |
0.172332943 |
| 5 |
Somewhat positive |
195 |
22.9% |
0.228604924 |
| 6 |
Positive |
326 |
38.2% |
0.382180539 |
| 7 |
Very positive |
121 |
14.2% |
0.141852286 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
2.8% |
0.028135991 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7662 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km41_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 or if the respondent is recruited in wave 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
116 |
2.8% |
0.02844532 |
| 2 |
Agree |
514 |
12.6% |
0.12604218 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1508 |
37.0% |
0.36978911 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
906 |
22.2% |
0.22216773 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
466 |
11.4% |
0.11427170 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
299 |
7.3% |
0.07332026 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
92 |
2.3% |
0.02256008 |
| 97 |
No answer |
177 |
4.3% |
0.04340363 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4437 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km41_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their
consumption as part of the solution to the climate challenge.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption as
part of the solution to the climate challenge.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 or if the respondent is recruited in wave 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
638 |
15.6% |
0.15644924 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1209 |
29.6% |
0.29646886 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1145 |
28.1% |
0.28077489 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
416 |
10.2% |
0.10201079 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
219 |
5.4% |
0.05370280 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
197 |
4.8% |
0.04830799 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
109 |
2.7% |
0.02672879 |
| 97 |
No answer |
145 |
3.6% |
0.03555665 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4437 |
|
NA |
w03_ran8
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1687] [Invalid:6828]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
147 |
8.7% |
0.08713693 |
| 2 |
2 |
138 |
8.2% |
0.08180202 |
| 3 |
3 |
148 |
8.8% |
0.08772970 |
| 4 |
4 |
145 |
8.6% |
0.08595139 |
| 5 |
5 |
129 |
7.6% |
0.07646710 |
| 6 |
6 |
169 |
10.0% |
0.10017783 |
| 7 |
7 |
132 |
7.8% |
0.07824541 |
| 8 |
8 |
128 |
7.6% |
0.07587433 |
| 9 |
9 |
137 |
8.1% |
0.08120925 |
| 10 |
10 |
133 |
7.9% |
0.07883817 |
| 11 |
11 |
143 |
8.5% |
0.08476586 |
| 12 |
12 |
138 |
8.2% |
0.08180202 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6828 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1a2a3a
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected
citizens, not diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens.
The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age
composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation,
ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was
reached goes against your wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006802721 |
| 2 |
Willing |
15 |
10.2% |
0.102040816 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
35 |
23.8% |
0.238095238 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
65 |
44.2% |
0.442176871 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
27 |
18.4% |
0.183673469 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.7% |
0.027210884 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8368 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1b2a3a
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically
elected citizens, not diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the
citizens of Norway. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population
in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence,
sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The
decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
2 |
1.4% |
0.01449275 |
| 2 |
Willing |
17 |
12.3% |
0.12318841 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
32 |
23.2% |
0.23188406 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
60 |
43.5% |
0.43478261 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
24 |
17.4% |
0.17391304 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8377 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1c2a3a
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts,
not diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities
consider to be experts in the area. The group does not reflect the
Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender,
place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work
experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your
wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
5 |
3.4% |
0.03378378 |
| 2 |
Willing |
42 |
28.4% |
0.28378378 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
41 |
27.7% |
0.27702703 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
47 |
31.8% |
0.31756757 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
11 |
7.4% |
0.07432432 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8367 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1a2b3a
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected
citizens, diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens.
The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age
composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation,
ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was
reached goes against your wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
5 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
| 2 |
Willing |
43 |
29.7% |
0.29655172 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
37 |
25.5% |
0.25517241 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
47 |
32.4% |
0.32413793 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
9 |
6.2% |
0.06206897 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.8% |
0.02758621 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8370 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1b2b3a
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically
elected citizens, diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the
citizens of Norway. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in
terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual
orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The
decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
4 |
3.1% |
0.03100775 |
| 2 |
Willing |
48 |
37.2% |
0.37209302 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
41 |
31.8% |
0.31782946 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
26 |
20.2% |
0.20155039 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
7 |
5.4% |
0.05426357 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8386 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1c2b3a
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts,
diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities
consider to be experts in the area. The group does reflect the Norwegian
population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of
residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and
religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
4 |
2.4% |
0.02366864 |
| 2 |
Willing |
62 |
36.7% |
0.36686391 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
55 |
32.5% |
0.32544379 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
37 |
21.9% |
0.21893491 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
7 |
4.1% |
0.04142012 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.4% |
0.02366864 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8346 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1a2a3b
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected
citizens, not diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens.
The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age
composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation,
ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was
reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
13 |
9.8% |
0.09848485 |
| 2 |
Willing |
28 |
21.2% |
0.21212121 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
39 |
29.5% |
0.29545455 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
32 |
24.2% |
0.24242424 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
16 |
12.1% |
0.12121212 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.0% |
0.03030303 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8383 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1b2a3b
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically
elected citizens, not diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the
citizens of Norway. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population
in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence,
sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The
decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=8]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
11 |
8.6% |
0.0859375 |
| 2 |
Willing |
37 |
28.9% |
0.2890625 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
30 |
23.4% |
0.2343750 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
30 |
23.4% |
0.2343750 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
16 |
12.5% |
0.1250000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.1% |
0.0312500 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8387 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1c2a3b
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts,
not diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities
consider to be experts in the area. The group does not reflect the
Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender,
place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work
experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with
your own wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=9]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
19 |
13.9% |
0.13868613 |
| 2 |
Willing |
55 |
40.1% |
0.40145985 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
37 |
27.0% |
0.27007299 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
12 |
8.8% |
0.08759124 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
9 |
6.6% |
0.06569343 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
3.6% |
0.03649635 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8378 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1a2b3b
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected
citizens, diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens.
The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age
composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation,
ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was
reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=10]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
17 |
12.8% |
0.12781955 |
| 2 |
Willing |
49 |
36.8% |
0.36842105 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
35 |
26.3% |
0.26315789 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
22 |
16.5% |
0.16541353 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
7 |
5.3% |
0.05263158 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.3% |
0.02255639 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8382 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1b2b3b
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically
elected citizens, diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the
citizens of Norway. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in
terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual
orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The
decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
19 |
13.3% |
0.13286713 |
| 2 |
Willing |
57 |
39.9% |
0.39860140 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
31 |
21.7% |
0.21678322 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
14 |
9.8% |
0.09790210 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
14 |
9.8% |
0.09790210 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
5.6% |
0.05594406 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8372 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1c2b3b
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts,
diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities
consider to be experts in the area. The group does reflect the Norwegian
population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of
residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and
religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=12]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
25 |
18.1% |
0.18115942 |
| 2 |
Willing |
49 |
35.5% |
0.35507246 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
36 |
26.1% |
0.26086957 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
20 |
14.5% |
0.14492754 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
5 |
3.6% |
0.03623188 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8377 |
|
NA |
w03_ran9
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2, except respondents recruited in wave 1 that earlier
have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1412] [Invalid:7103]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
120 |
8.5% |
0.08498584 |
| 2 |
2 |
138 |
9.8% |
0.09773371 |
| 3 |
3 |
117 |
8.3% |
0.08286119 |
| 4 |
4 |
122 |
8.6% |
0.08640227 |
| 5 |
5 |
125 |
8.9% |
0.08852691 |
| 6 |
6 |
111 |
7.9% |
0.07861190 |
| 7 |
7 |
101 |
7.2% |
0.07152975 |
| 8 |
8 |
125 |
8.9% |
0.08852691 |
| 9 |
9 |
106 |
7.5% |
0.07507082 |
| 10 |
10 |
114 |
8.1% |
0.08073654 |
| 11 |
11 |
125 |
8.9% |
0.08852691 |
| 12 |
12 |
108 |
7.6% |
0.07648725 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7103 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1a2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You do not have the opportunity to influence this
decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the
money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been
exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
10 |
8.3% |
0.08333333 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
95 |
79.2% |
0.79166667 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
15 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8395 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1b2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You do have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to
be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=2. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been
exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
12 |
8.7% |
0.08695652 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
115 |
83.3% |
0.83333333 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
8 |
5.8% |
0.05797101 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8377 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1c2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome, is among 1000 participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of a thousand selected respondents who get to vote on
how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=3. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been
exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
8 |
6.8% |
0.06837607 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
98 |
83.8% |
0.83760684 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
9 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.7% |
0.01709402 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1d2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome, is among 100 participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of a hundred selected respondents who get to vote on how
the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=4. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been
exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
7 |
5.7% |
0.057377049 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
104 |
85.2% |
0.852459016 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
10 |
8.2% |
0.081967213 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008196721 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8393 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1e2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome, is among 10 participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of ten selected respondents who get to vote on how the
money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=5. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been
exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
7 |
5.6% |
0.056 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
112 |
89.6% |
0.896 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
4 |
3.2% |
0.032 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.6% |
0.016 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8390 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1f2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome, is among 3 participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of three selected respondents who get to vote on how the
money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=6. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been
exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
4 |
3.6% |
0.03603604 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
95 |
85.6% |
0.85585586 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
9 |
8.1% |
0.08108108 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.7% |
0.02702703 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8404 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1a2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You do not have the opportunity to influence this
decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the
money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=7. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been
exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
11 |
10.9% |
0.10891089 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
74 |
73.3% |
0.73267327 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
15 |
14.9% |
0.14851485 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
1.0% |
0.00990099 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8414 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1b2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation:: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You do have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to
be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=8. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been
exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
12 |
9.6% |
0.096 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
103 |
82.4% |
0.824 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
9 |
7.2% |
0.072 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8390 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1c2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 1000
participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of a thousand selected respondents who get to vote on
how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=9. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been
exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
5 |
4.7% |
0.047169811 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
87 |
82.1% |
0.820754717 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
13 |
12.3% |
0.122641509 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8409 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1d2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 100
participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of a hundred selected respondents who get to vote on how
the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=10. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
9 |
7.9% |
0.07894737 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
91 |
79.8% |
0.79824561 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
14 |
12.3% |
0.12280702 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8401 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1e2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 10
participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of ten selected respondents who get to vote on how the
money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=11. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
10 |
8.0% |
0.080 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
109 |
87.2% |
0.872 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
4 |
3.2% |
0.032 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.6% |
0.016 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8390 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1f2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 3
participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of three selected respondents who get to vote on how the
money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=12. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
8 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
89 |
82.4% |
0.82407407 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
11 |
10.2% |
0.10185185 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8407 |
|
NA |
w03_ran10
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2, except respondents recruited in wave 1 that earlier
have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1411] [Invalid:7104]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
358 |
25.4% |
0.2537208 |
| 2 |
2 |
343 |
24.3% |
0.2430900 |
| 3 |
3 |
334 |
23.7% |
0.2367116 |
| 4 |
4 |
376 |
26.6% |
0.2664777 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7104 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad313_1a2a
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable decision: Draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to
participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a draw for a travel gift card
worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel. To what
extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran10=1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
34 |
9.5% |
0.09497207 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
55 |
15.4% |
0.15363128 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
114 |
31.8% |
0.31843575 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
87 |
24.3% |
0.24301676 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
61 |
17.0% |
0.17039106 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.0% |
0.01955307 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8157 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad313_1b2a
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable decision: A donation of NOK 5,000 given to Doctors without
borders
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a donation of NOK 5,000 to
Doctors without borders. To what extent do you think this decision is
acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran10=2. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
231 |
67.3% |
0.67346939 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
78 |
22.7% |
0.22740525 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
16 |
4.7% |
0.04664723 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
5 |
1.5% |
0.01457726 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
8 |
2.3% |
0.02332362 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.5% |
0.01457726 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8172 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad313_1a2b
|
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept decision: Draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000
to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a draw for a travel gift card
worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel. How
willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran10=3. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
31 |
9.3% |
0.09281437 |
| 2 |
Willing |
127 |
38.0% |
0.38023952 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
73 |
21.9% |
0.21856287 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
64 |
19.2% |
0.19161677 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
28 |
8.4% |
0.08383234 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
3.3% |
0.03293413 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8181 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad313_1b2b
|
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept decision: A donation of NOK 5,000 given to Doctors
without borders
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a donation of NOK 5,000 to
Doctors without borders. How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran10=4. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
274 |
72.9% |
0.72872340 |
| 2 |
Willing |
75 |
19.9% |
0.19946809 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
11 |
2.9% |
0.02925532 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
8 |
2.1% |
0.02127660 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
4 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8139 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4ea
|
Variable label:
|
Upsetting: Labour migrants from EU countries have access to the same
welfare benefits as Norwegians
|
|
Literal question:
|
Does it upset you that labour migrants from EU countries have access to
the same welfare benefits as Norwegians do?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2. R3CC4a and R3CC4b is asked on the same page, in a
randomized order]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
753 |
43.8% |
0.43804538 |
| 2 |
No |
888 |
51.7% |
0.51657941 |
| 97 |
No answer |
78 |
4.5% |
0.04537522 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4eb
|
Variable label:
|
Upsetting: Those who are ill due to smoking receive treatment that is
equally good and expensive as non-smoking patients
|
|
Literal question:
|
Does it upset you that those who are ill due to smoking receive
treatment that is equally good and expensive as non-smoking patients?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2. R3CC4a and R3CC4b is asked on the same page, in a
randomized order]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
269 |
15.6% |
0.15648633 |
| 2 |
No |
1380 |
80.3% |
0.80279232 |
| 97 |
No answer |
70 |
4.1% |
0.04072135 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc7
|
Variable label:
|
Number of conditions that are upsetting [List 1]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Indicate how many of these four situations upset you. We are only
interested in how many upset you, not which ones.
That new Norwegian roads are often funded by collecting tolls
That
sportspeople earn tens of millions of kroner
That many do not
believe in climate change caused by human activities
That we have to
pay the NRK licence fee
That the government has now reduced the
paternal quota (“paternity leave”)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2. Situasjonene i R3CC7 er listet i randomisert rekkefølge]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
77 |
4.5% |
0.04479348 |
| 1 |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
2 |
280 |
16.3% |
0.16288540 |
| 3 |
3 |
528 |
30.7% |
0.30715532 |
| 4 |
4 |
472 |
27.5% |
0.27457824 |
| 5 |
5 |
210 |
12.2% |
0.12216405 |
| 97 |
No answer |
69 |
4.0% |
0.04013962 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
| 6 |
6 |
83 |
4.8% |
0.04828389 |
w03_ran11
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1673] [Invalid:6842]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
430 |
25.7% |
0.2570233 |
| 2 |
2 |
407 |
24.3% |
0.2432756 |
| 3 |
3 |
424 |
25.3% |
0.2534369 |
| 4 |
4 |
412 |
24.6% |
0.2462642 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6842 |
|
NA |
w03_ro1a
|
Variable label:
|
Prediction about oil consumption: Plenty of oil in 25 years or used up
in 15 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some people say that we will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now.
Others say that at the rate we are using our oil, it will all be used up
in 15 years. Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran11=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
There will be plenty of oil in 25 years |
322 |
74.9% |
0.7488372 |
| 2 |
Oil will be used up in 15 years |
92 |
21.4% |
0.2139535 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
3.7% |
0.0372093 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8085 |
|
NA |
w03_ro1b
|
Variable label:
|
Prediction about oil consumption: Used up all oil in 15 years or plenty
in 25 years
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now a few general questions regarding our society in Norway. We would
like to ask you for your personal opinion about these issues.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some people say that that at the rate we are using our oil, it will be
all used up in 15 years. Others say that we will still have plenty of
oil 25 years from now. Which of these ideas would you guess is most
nearly right?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran11=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oil will be used up in 15 years |
57 |
14.0% |
0.14004914 |
| 2 |
There will be plenty of oil in 25 years |
330 |
81.1% |
0.81081081 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
4.9% |
0.04914005 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8108 |
|
NA |
w03_ro1c
|
Variable label:
|
Prediction about oil consumption: Plenty of oil in 25 years or used up
in 15 years
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now a few general questions regarding our society in the Norway. We
would like to ask you for your personal opinion about these issues.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right? We will still
have plenty of oil 25 years from now, or at the rate we are using our
oil, it will all be used up in 15 years.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran11=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
There will be plenty of oil in 25 years |
330 |
77.8% |
0.77830189 |
| 2 |
Oil will be used up in 15 years |
86 |
20.3% |
0.20283019 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.9% |
0.01886792 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8091 |
|
NA |
w03_ro1d
|
Variable label:
|
Prediction about oil consumption: Used up all oil in 15 years or plenty
in 25 years
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now a few general questions regarding our society in the United States.
We would like to ask you for your personal opinion about these issues.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right? At the rate
we are using our oil, it will be all used up in 15 years, or we will
still have plenty of oil 25 years from now.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran11=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oil will be used up in 15 years |
80 |
19.4% |
0.19417476 |
| 2 |
There will be plenty of oil in 25 years |
321 |
77.9% |
0.77912621 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.7% |
0.02669903 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8103 |
|
NA |
w03_ran12
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1673] [Invalid:6842]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
451 |
27.0% |
0.2695756 |
| 2 |
2 |
426 |
25.5% |
0.2546324 |
| 3 |
3 |
396 |
23.7% |
0.2367005 |
| 4 |
4 |
400 |
23.9% |
0.2390915 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6842 |
|
NA |
w03_ro2a
|
Variable label:
|
Determining gasoline and oil prices: Each company sets its own prices to
meet the competition.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this idea of how gasoline and oil prices
are decided? Each company sets its own prices to meet the competition.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran12=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
248 |
55.0% |
0.54988914 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
186 |
41.2% |
0.41241685 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
3.8% |
0.03769401 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8064 |
|
NA |
w03_ro2b
|
Variable label:
|
Determining gasoline and oil prices: The oil companies get together and
set prices for their products.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this idea of how gasoline and oil prices
are decided? The oil companies get together and set prices for their
products.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran12=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
125 |
29.3% |
0.29342723 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
279 |
65.5% |
0.65492958 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
5.2% |
0.05164319 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8089 |
|
NA |
w03_ro2c
|
Variable label:
|
Determining gasoline and oil prices: Each company sets its own prices to
meet the competition, or the oil companies get together and set prices
for their products.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these statements comes closest to your own idea of how gasoline
and oil prices are decided? Each company sets its own prices to meet the
competition, or the oil companies get together and set prices for their
products.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran12=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Each company sets its own prices |
131 |
33.1% |
0.33080808 |
| 2 |
Oil companies get together |
250 |
63.1% |
0.63131313 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
3.8% |
0.03787879 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8119 |
|
NA |
w03_ro2d
|
Variable label:
|
Determining gasoline and oil prices: The oil companies get together and
set prices for their products, or each company sets its own prices to
meet the competition.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these statements comes closest to your own idea of how gasoline
and oil prices are decided? The oil companies get together and set
prices for their products, or each company sets its own prices to meet
the competition.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran12=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oil companies get together |
258 |
64.5% |
0.645 |
| 2 |
Each company sets its own prices |
128 |
32.0% |
0.320 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
3.5% |
0.035 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8115 |
|
NA |
w03_ran13
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1672] [Invalid:6843]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
440 |
26.3% |
0.2631579 |
| 2 |
2 |
393 |
23.5% |
0.2350478 |
| 3 |
3 |
434 |
26.0% |
0.2595694 |
| 4 |
4 |
405 |
24.2% |
0.2422249 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6843 |
|
NA |
w03_ro3a
|
Variable label:
|
Public housing: Government should provide adequate housing or each
person should provide for it themselves
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some people feel the government should see to it that all people have
adequate housing, while others feel each person should provide for his
or her own housing. Which comes closest to how you feel about this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran13=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Government should see to adequate housing |
226 |
51.4% |
0.51363636 |
| 2 |
Let each person provide for own housing |
199 |
45.2% |
0.45227273 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
3.4% |
0.03409091 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8075 |
|
NA |
w03_ro3b
|
Variable label:
|
Public housing: Each person should provide for it themselves or the
government should provide adequate housing
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some people feel each person should provide for his or her own housing,
while others feel the government should see to it that all people have
adequate housing. Which comes closest to how you feel about this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran13=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Let each person provide for own housing |
239 |
60.8% |
0.60814249 |
| 2 |
Government should see to adequate housing |
134 |
34.1% |
0.34096692 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
5.1% |
0.05089059 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8122 |
|
NA |
w03_ro3c
|
Variable label:
|
Public housing: Government should provide adequate housing or each
person should provide for it themselves
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which comes closest to how you feel about this? The government should
see to it that all people have adequate housing, or each person should
provide for his or her own housing.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran13=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Government should see to adequate housing |
219 |
50.5% |
0.50460829 |
| 2 |
Let each person provide for own housing |
193 |
44.5% |
0.44470046 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
5.1% |
0.05069124 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8081 |
|
NA |
w03_ro3d
|
Variable label:
|
Public housing: Each person should provide for it themselves or the
government should provide adequate housing
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which comes closest to how you feel about this? Each person should
provide for his or her own housing, or the government should see to it
that all people have adequate housing.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran13=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Let each person provide for own housing |
240 |
59.3% |
0.59259259 |
| 2 |
Government should see to adequate housing |
152 |
37.5% |
0.37530864 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
3.2% |
0.03209877 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8110 |
|
NA |
w03_pad301_1
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: The law courts
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following
institutions and entities?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The law courts
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
226 |
13.6% |
0.13557289 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
829 |
49.7% |
0.49730054 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
307 |
18.4% |
0.18416317 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
124 |
7.4% |
0.07438512 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
64 |
3.8% |
0.03839232 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
26 |
1.6% |
0.01559688 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01199760 |
| 97 |
No answer |
40 |
2.4% |
0.02399520 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
31 |
1.9% |
0.01859628 |
w03_pad301_2
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: The police
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following
institutions and entities?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The police
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
157 |
9.4% |
0.09418116 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
869 |
52.1% |
0.52129574 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
373 |
22.4% |
0.22375525 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
85 |
5.1% |
0.05098980 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
85 |
5.1% |
0.05098980 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
36 |
2.2% |
0.02159568 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
21 |
1.3% |
0.01259748 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
2.3% |
0.02279544 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
3 |
0.2% |
0.00179964 |
w03_pad301_3
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: Media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following
institutions and entities?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Media
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
13 |
0.8% |
0.00779844 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
156 |
9.4% |
0.09358128 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
521 |
31.3% |
0.31253749 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
328 |
19.7% |
0.19676065 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
414 |
24.8% |
0.24835033 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
131 |
7.9% |
0.07858428 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
61 |
3.7% |
0.03659268 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
2.3% |
0.02339532 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
4 |
0.2% |
0.00239952 |
w03_pad301_4
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: Researchers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following
institutions and entities?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Researchers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
134 |
8.0% |
0.08038392 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
679 |
40.7% |
0.40731854 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
473 |
28.4% |
0.28374325 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
200 |
12.0% |
0.11997600 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
82 |
4.9% |
0.04919016 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
18 |
1.1% |
0.01079784 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
10 |
0.6% |
0.00599880 |
| 97 |
No answer |
46 |
2.8% |
0.02759448 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
25 |
1.5% |
0.01499700 |
w03_pad301_5
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: NAV
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following
institutions and entities?
|
|
Literal question:
|
NAV
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
22 |
1.3% |
0.01319736 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
223 |
13.4% |
0.13377325 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
460 |
27.6% |
0.27594481 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
329 |
19.7% |
0.19736053 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
301 |
18.1% |
0.18056389 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
148 |
8.9% |
0.08878224 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
102 |
6.1% |
0.06118776 |
| 97 |
No answer |
41 |
2.5% |
0.02459508 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
41 |
2.5% |
0.02459508 |
w03_pad301_6
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: The banking industry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following
institutions and entities?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The banking industry
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
78 |
4.7% |
0.04679064 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
486 |
29.2% |
0.29154169 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
487 |
29.2% |
0.29214157 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
239 |
14.3% |
0.14337133 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
227 |
13.6% |
0.13617277 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
67 |
4.0% |
0.04019196 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
30 |
1.8% |
0.01799640 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
2.3% |
0.02279544 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
15 |
0.9% |
0.00899820 |
w03_pad301_7
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: The national health service
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following
institutions and entities?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The national health service
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
127 |
7.6% |
0.07618476 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
782 |
46.9% |
0.46910618 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
465 |
27.9% |
0.27894421 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
95 |
5.7% |
0.05698860 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
108 |
6.5% |
0.06478704 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
31 |
1.9% |
0.01859628 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
17 |
1.0% |
0.01019796 |
| 97 |
No answer |
41 |
2.5% |
0.02459508 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
1 |
0.1% |
0.00059988 |
w03_ran14
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:6862]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
848 |
51.3% |
0.5130067 |
| 2 |
2 |
805 |
48.7% |
0.4869933 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6862 |
|
NA |
w03_pad303_1
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the national level: Crises caused by nature
such as landslides, floods, hurricanes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities
at the national level are capable of handling different types of
accidents and crises?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Crises caused by nature such as landslides, floods, hurricanes
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
29 |
3.4% |
0.034198113 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
348 |
41.0% |
0.410377358 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
290 |
34.2% |
0.341981132 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
60 |
7.1% |
0.070754717 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
80 |
9.4% |
0.094339623 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
20 |
2.4% |
0.023584906 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005896226 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.012971698 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7667 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005896226 |
w03_pad303_2
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the national level: Accidents in connection
with aircraft, railways, roads and shipping traffic
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities
at the national level are capable of handling different types of
accidents and crises?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Accidents in connection with aircraft, railways, roads and shipping
traffic
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
35 |
4.1% |
0.041273585 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
373 |
44.0% |
0.439858491 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
289 |
34.1% |
0.340801887 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
64 |
7.5% |
0.075471698 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
51 |
6.0% |
0.060141509 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
16 |
1.9% |
0.018867925 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001179245 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.014150943 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7667 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008254717 |
w03_pad303_3
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the national level: Infections in
connection with food, drinking water or epidemics
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities
at the national level are capable of handling different types of
accidents and crises?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Infections in connection with food, drinking water or epidemics (for
example bird flu, swine flu, E.coli)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
36 |
4.2% |
0.042452830 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
308 |
36.3% |
0.363207547 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
302 |
35.6% |
0.356132075 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
71 |
8.4% |
0.083726415 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
79 |
9.3% |
0.093160377 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
27 |
3.2% |
0.031839623 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
8 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.012971698 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7667 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007075472 |
w03_pad303_4
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the national level: Failure of critical
infrastructure
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities
at the national level are capable of handling different types of
accidents and crises?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Failure of critical infrastructure (such as power supply, electronic
communication, telecommunication, oil and fuel supplies)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01768868 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
249 |
29.4% |
0.29363208 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
295 |
34.8% |
0.34787736 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
93 |
11.0% |
0.10966981 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
129 |
15.2% |
0.15212264 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
30 |
3.5% |
0.03537736 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01415094 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01415094 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7667 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
13 |
1.5% |
0.01533019 |
w03_pad303_5
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the national level: Terrorist attack
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities
at the national level are capable of handling different types of
accidents and crises?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Terrorist attack
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
17 |
2.0% |
0.020047170 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
184 |
21.7% |
0.216981132 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
320 |
37.7% |
0.377358491 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
86 |
10.1% |
0.101415094 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
132 |
15.6% |
0.155660377 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
59 |
7.0% |
0.069575472 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
31 |
3.7% |
0.036556604 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.012971698 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7667 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
8 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
w03_pad304_1
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the local level: Crises caused by nature
such as landslides, floods, hurricanes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities
at the local level are capable of handling different types of accidents
and crises?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Crises caused by nature such as landslides, floods, hurricanes
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
33 |
4.1% |
0.040993789 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
255 |
31.7% |
0.316770186 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
300 |
37.3% |
0.372670807 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
87 |
10.8% |
0.108074534 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
74 |
9.2% |
0.091925466 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
26 |
3.2% |
0.032298137 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
12 |
1.5% |
0.014906832 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.2% |
0.012422360 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7710 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009937888 |
w03_pad304_2
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the local level: Accidents in connection
with aircraft, railways, roads and shipping traffic
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities
at the local level are capable of handling different types of accidents
and crises?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Accidents in connection with aircraft, railways, roads and shipping
traffic
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
35 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
302 |
37.5% |
0.37515528 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
256 |
31.8% |
0.31801242 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
78 |
9.7% |
0.09689441 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
84 |
10.4% |
0.10434783 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
18 |
2.2% |
0.02236025 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01118012 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01490683 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7710 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
11 |
1.4% |
0.01366460 |
w03_pad304_3
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the local level: Infections in connection
with food, drinking water or epidemics
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities
at the local level are capable of handling different types of accidents
and crises?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Infections in connection with food, drinking water or epidemics (for
example bird flu, swine flu, E.coli)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
30 |
3.7% |
0.037267081 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
237 |
29.4% |
0.294409938 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
252 |
31.3% |
0.313043478 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
107 |
13.3% |
0.132919255 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
97 |
12.0% |
0.120496894 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
40 |
5.0% |
0.049689441 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
24 |
3.0% |
0.029813665 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.4% |
0.013664596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7710 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
7 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
w03_pad304_4
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the local level: Failure of critical
infrastructure
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities
at the local level are capable of handling different types of accidents
and crises?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Failure of critical infrastructure (such as power supply, electronic
communication, telecommunication, oil and fuel supplies)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
17 |
2.1% |
0.02111801 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
209 |
26.0% |
0.25962733 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
264 |
32.8% |
0.32795031 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
109 |
13.5% |
0.13540373 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
123 |
15.3% |
0.15279503 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
35 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
22 |
2.7% |
0.02732919 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01490683 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7710 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
14 |
1.7% |
0.01739130 |
w03_pad304_5
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the local level: Terrorist attack
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities
at the local level are capable of handling different types of accidents
and crises?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Terrorist attack
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
18 |
2.2% |
0.02236025 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
118 |
14.7% |
0.14658385 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
253 |
31.4% |
0.31428571 |
| 4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
102 |
12.7% |
0.12670807 |
| 5 |
Some lack of confidence |
145 |
18.0% |
0.18012422 |
| 6 |
A high lack of confidence |
92 |
11.4% |
0.11428571 |
| 7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
54 |
6.7% |
0.06708075 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.2% |
0.01242236 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7710 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01614907 |
w03_pad307
|
Variable label:
|
Parliament discussing a new unreasonable measure, likelihood of trying
to influence the outcome?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that Parliament was discussing a new measure that you thought
was completely unreasonable. How likely is it that you would try to do
something to influence the outcome?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
59 |
3.5% |
0.03539292 |
| 2 |
Likely |
219 |
13.1% |
0.13137373 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
496 |
29.8% |
0.29754049 |
| 4 |
Slightly likely |
718 |
43.1% |
0.43071386 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
140 |
8.4% |
0.08398320 |
| 97 |
No answer |
35 |
2.1% |
0.02099580 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad308
|
Variable label:
|
Preferred approach to political influence
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you wanted to influence the outcome of an issue, what would be your
preferred approach?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Would write a letter to the editor of a newspaper |
255 |
15.3% |
0.15296941 |
| 2 |
Would work to obtain media coverage in another way |
156 |
9.4% |
0.09358128 |
| 3 |
Would discuss the issue in the party or organisation that I am a member of |
133 |
8.0% |
0.07978404 |
| 4 |
Would contact a politician |
248 |
14.9% |
0.14877025 |
| 5 |
Would contact an employee in the ministry responsible |
73 |
4.4% |
0.04379124 |
| 6 |
Would organise a petition |
81 |
4.9% |
0.04859028 |
| 7 |
Would organise action |
40 |
2.4% |
0.02399520 |
| 8 |
Not sure |
567 |
34.0% |
0.34013197 |
| 9 |
Not sure |
59 |
3.5% |
0.03539292 |
| 97 |
No answer |
55 |
3.3% |
0.03299340 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad309_1
|
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Contacted a politician at the local
level
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the
following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if
yes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Contacted a politician at the local level
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Contacted a politician at the local level |
164 |
9.8% |
0.09838032 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1489 |
89.3% |
0.89322136 |
w03_pad309_2
|
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Contacted a politician at the national
level
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the
following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if
yes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Contacted a politician at the national level
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Contacted a politician at the national level |
64 |
3.8% |
0.03839232 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1589 |
95.3% |
0.95320936 |
w03_pad309_3
|
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Shown a political viewpoint in social
media or other websites
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the
following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if
yes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Shown a political viewpoint in social media or other websites
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Shown a political viewpoint in social media or other websites |
311 |
18.7% |
0.18656269 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1342 |
80.5% |
0.80503899 |
w03_pad309_4
|
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Participated in work in a voluntary
organisation or association
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the
following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if
yes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in work in a voluntary organisation or association
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Participated in work in a voluntary organisation or association |
282 |
16.9% |
0.16916617 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1371 |
82.2% |
0.82243551 |
w03_pad309_5
|
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Worn or hung up a campaign message or
emblem
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the
following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if
yes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Worn or hung up a campaign message or emblem
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Worn or hung up a campaign message or emblem |
72 |
4.3% |
0.04319136 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1581 |
94.8% |
0.94841032 |
w03_pad309_6
|
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Signed a petition, a formal written
request, an action list or similar
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the
following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if
yes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Signed a petition, a formal written request, an action list or similar.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Signed a petition, a formal written request, an action list or similar. |
497 |
29.8% |
0.29814037 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1156 |
69.3% |
0.69346131 |
w03_pad309_7
|
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Participated in a public demonstration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the
following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if
yes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in a public demonstration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Participated in a public demonstration |
135 |
8.1% |
0.08098380 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1518 |
91.1% |
0.91061788 |
w03_pad309_8
|
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Boycotted specific products
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the
following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if
yes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Boycotted specific products
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Boycotted specific products |
467 |
28.0% |
0.28014397 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1186 |
71.1% |
0.71145771 |
w03_pad309_9
|
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Consciously purchased specific products
for political, moral or eco-friendly reasons
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the
following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if
yes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consciously purchased specific products for political, moral or
eco-friendly reasons
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Consciously purchased specific products for political, moral or eco-friendly
reasons |
552 |
33.1% |
0.33113377 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1101 |
66.0% |
0.66046791 |
w03_pad310_1
|
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same level of
education as you have
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in
the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the
qualities below are for this person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The same level of education as you have
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
34 |
2.0% |
0.02039592 |
| 2 |
Important |
140 |
8.4% |
0.08398320 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
309 |
18.5% |
0.18536293 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
544 |
32.6% |
0.32633473 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
537 |
32.2% |
0.32213557 |
| 97 |
No answer |
103 |
6.2% |
0.06178764 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_2
|
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: From the same part of
the country as you are
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in
the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the
qualities below are for this person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
From the same part of the country as you are
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
51 |
3.1% |
0.03059388 |
| 2 |
Important |
169 |
10.1% |
0.10137972 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
276 |
16.6% |
0.16556689 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
430 |
25.8% |
0.25794841 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
648 |
38.9% |
0.38872226 |
| 97 |
No answer |
93 |
5.6% |
0.05578884 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_3
|
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same gender as you
are
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in
the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the
qualities below are for this person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The same gender as you are
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
8 |
0.5% |
0.00479904 |
| 2 |
Important |
44 |
2.6% |
0.02639472 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
90 |
5.4% |
0.05398920 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
452 |
27.1% |
0.27114577 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
969 |
58.1% |
0.58128374 |
| 97 |
No answer |
104 |
6.2% |
0.06238752 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_4
|
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same religious
belief as you have
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in
the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the
qualities below are for this person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The same religious belief as you have
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
57 |
3.4% |
0.03419316 |
| 2 |
Important |
151 |
9.1% |
0.09058188 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
273 |
16.4% |
0.16376725 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
473 |
28.4% |
0.28374325 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
610 |
36.6% |
0.36592681 |
| 97 |
No answer |
103 |
6.2% |
0.06178764 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_5
|
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: About the same age as
you
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in
the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the
qualities below are for this person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
About the same age as you
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
15 |
0.9% |
0.00899820 |
| 2 |
Important |
97 |
5.8% |
0.05818836 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
296 |
17.8% |
0.17756449 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
537 |
32.2% |
0.32213557 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
623 |
37.4% |
0.37372525 |
| 97 |
No answer |
99 |
5.9% |
0.05938812 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_6
|
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same ethnic
background as you have
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in
the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the
qualities below are for this person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The same ethnic background as you have
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
69 |
4.1% |
0.04139172 |
| 2 |
Important |
190 |
11.4% |
0.11397720 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
262 |
15.7% |
0.15716857 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
440 |
26.4% |
0.26394721 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
610 |
36.6% |
0.36592681 |
| 97 |
No answer |
96 |
5.8% |
0.05758848 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_7
|
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same political
viewpoint as you have
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in
the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the
qualities below are for this person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The same political viewpoint as you have
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
341 |
20.5% |
0.20455909 |
| 2 |
Important |
642 |
38.5% |
0.38512298 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
389 |
23.3% |
0.23335333 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
120 |
7.2% |
0.07198560 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
96 |
5.8% |
0.05758848 |
| 97 |
No answer |
79 |
4.7% |
0.04739052 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_8
|
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same type of work
experience as you have
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in
the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the
qualities below are for this person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The same type of work experience as you have
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
38 |
2.3% |
0.02279544 |
| 2 |
Important |
150 |
9.0% |
0.08998200 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
340 |
20.4% |
0.20395921 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
538 |
32.3% |
0.32273545 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
501 |
30.1% |
0.30053989 |
| 97 |
No answer |
100 |
6.0% |
0.05998800 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_9
|
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same sexual
orientation as you have
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in
the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the
qualities below are for this person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The same sexual orientation as you have
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
27 |
1.6% |
0.01619676 |
| 2 |
Important |
63 |
3.8% |
0.03779244 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
72 |
4.3% |
0.04319136 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
347 |
20.8% |
0.20815837 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
1050 |
63.0% |
0.62987403 |
| 97 |
No answer |
108 |
6.5% |
0.06478704 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_ran15
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1652] [Invalid:6863]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
162 |
9.8% |
0.09806295 |
| 2 |
2 |
157 |
9.5% |
0.09503632 |
| 3 |
3 |
128 |
7.7% |
0.07748184 |
| 4 |
4 |
142 |
8.6% |
0.08595642 |
| 5 |
5 |
135 |
8.2% |
0.08171913 |
| 6 |
6 |
135 |
8.2% |
0.08171913 |
| 7 |
7 |
138 |
8.4% |
0.08353511 |
| 8 |
8 |
112 |
6.8% |
0.06779661 |
| 9 |
9 |
136 |
8.2% |
0.08232446 |
| 10 |
10 |
146 |
8.8% |
0.08837772 |
| 11 |
11 |
124 |
7.5% |
0.07506053 |
| 12 |
12 |
137 |
8.3% |
0.08292978 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6863 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1a2a3a
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected
citizens, not diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens.
The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age
composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation,
ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was
reached goes against your wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
4 |
2.5% |
0.02469136 |
| 2 |
Willing |
17 |
10.5% |
0.10493827 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
41 |
25.3% |
0.25308642 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
64 |
39.5% |
0.39506173 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
32 |
19.8% |
0.19753086 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.5% |
0.02469136 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8353 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1b2a3a
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically
elected citizens, not diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the
citizens of Norway. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population
in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence,
sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The
decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
6 |
3.8% |
0.03821656 |
| 2 |
Willing |
30 |
19.1% |
0.19108280 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
42 |
26.8% |
0.26751592 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
61 |
38.9% |
0.38853503 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
16 |
10.2% |
0.10191083 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.3% |
0.01273885 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8358 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1c2a3a
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts,
not diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities
consider to be experts in the area. The group does not reflect the
Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender,
place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work
experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your
wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
1 |
0.8% |
0.0078125 |
| 2 |
Willing |
21 |
16.4% |
0.1640625 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
46 |
35.9% |
0.3593750 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
46 |
35.9% |
0.3593750 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
9 |
7.0% |
0.0703125 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
3.9% |
0.0390625 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8387 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1a2b3a
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected
citizens, diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens.
The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age
composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation,
ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was
reached goes against your wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
5 |
3.5% |
0.03521127 |
| 2 |
Willing |
49 |
34.5% |
0.34507042 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
43 |
30.3% |
0.30281690 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
30 |
21.1% |
0.21126761 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
12 |
8.5% |
0.08450704 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.1% |
0.02112676 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8373 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1b2b3a
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically
elected citizens, diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the
citizens of Norway. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in
terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual
orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The
decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
| 2 |
Willing |
54 |
40.0% |
0.40000000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
36 |
26.7% |
0.26666667 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
34 |
25.2% |
0.25185185 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8380 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1c2b3a
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts,
diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities
consider to be experts in the area. The group does reflect the Norwegian
population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of
residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and
religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
9 |
6.7% |
0.066666667 |
| 2 |
Willing |
44 |
32.6% |
0.325925926 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
53 |
39.3% |
0.392592593 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
25 |
18.5% |
0.185185185 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
3 |
2.2% |
0.022222222 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8380 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1a2a3b
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected
citizens, not diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens.
The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age
composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation,
ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was
reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
16 |
11.6% |
0.11594203 |
| 2 |
Willing |
46 |
33.3% |
0.33333333 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
38 |
27.5% |
0.27536232 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
21 |
15.2% |
0.15217391 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
11 |
8.0% |
0.07971014 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8377 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1b2a3b
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically
elected citizens, not diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the
citizens of Norway. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population
in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence,
sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The
decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=8]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
18 |
16.1% |
0.16071429 |
| 2 |
Willing |
41 |
36.6% |
0.36607143 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
27 |
24.1% |
0.24107143 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
16 |
14.3% |
0.14285714 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
5 |
4.5% |
0.04464286 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
4.5% |
0.04464286 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1c2a3b
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts,
not diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities
consider to be experts in the area. The group does not reflect the
Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender,
place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work
experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with
your own wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=9]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
23 |
16.9% |
0.16911765 |
| 2 |
Willing |
63 |
46.3% |
0.46323529 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
29 |
21.3% |
0.21323529 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
9 |
6.6% |
0.06617647 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
5 |
3.7% |
0.03676471 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
5.1% |
0.05147059 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8379 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1a2b3b
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected
citizens, diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens.
The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age
composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation,
ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was
reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=10]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
28 |
19.2% |
0.19178082 |
| 2 |
Willing |
54 |
37.0% |
0.36986301 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
25 |
17.1% |
0.17123288 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
20 |
13.7% |
0.13698630 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
15 |
10.3% |
0.10273973 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.7% |
0.02739726 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8369 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1b2b3b
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically
elected citizens, diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the
citizens of Norway. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in
terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual
orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The
decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
29 |
23.4% |
0.23387097 |
| 2 |
Willing |
55 |
44.4% |
0.44354839 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
27 |
21.8% |
0.21774194 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
4 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
5 |
4.0% |
0.04032258 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8391 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1c2b3b
|
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts,
diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to
be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This
decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities
consider to be experts in the area. The group does reflect the Norwegian
population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of
residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and
religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=12]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
42 |
30.7% |
0.30656934 |
| 2 |
Willing |
61 |
44.5% |
0.44525547 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
19 |
13.9% |
0.13868613 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
8 |
5.8% |
0.05839416 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
2 |
1.5% |
0.01459854 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
3.6% |
0.03649635 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8378 |
|
NA |
w03_ran16
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3, except respondents recruited in wave 1 that earlier
have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1368] [Invalid:7147]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
106 |
7.7% |
0.07748538 |
| 2 |
2 |
124 |
9.1% |
0.09064327 |
| 3 |
3 |
116 |
8.5% |
0.08479532 |
| 4 |
4 |
118 |
8.6% |
0.08625731 |
| 5 |
5 |
121 |
8.8% |
0.08845029 |
| 6 |
6 |
99 |
7.2% |
0.07236842 |
| 7 |
7 |
111 |
8.1% |
0.08114035 |
| 8 |
8 |
111 |
8.1% |
0.08114035 |
| 9 |
9 |
107 |
7.8% |
0.07821637 |
| 10 |
10 |
121 |
8.8% |
0.08845029 |
| 11 |
11 |
119 |
8.7% |
0.08698830 |
| 12 |
12 |
115 |
8.4% |
0.08406433 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7147 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1a2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You do not have the opportunity to influence this
decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the
money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=1. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har
blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette
spørsmålet]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
8 |
7.5% |
0.075471698 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
91 |
85.8% |
0.858490566 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
6 |
5.7% |
0.056603774 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8409 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1b2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You do have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to
be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=2. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har
blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette
spørsmålet]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
13 |
10.5% |
0.104838710 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
99 |
79.8% |
0.798387097 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
11 |
8.9% |
0.088709677 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008064516 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8391 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1c2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome, is among 1000 participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of a thousand selected respondents who get to vote on
how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=3. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har
blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette
spørsmålet]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
11 |
9.5% |
0.09482759 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
97 |
83.6% |
0.83620690 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
6.0% |
0.06034483 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.00862069 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8399 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1d2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome, is among 100 participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of a hundred selected respondents who get to vote on how
the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=4. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har
blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette
spørsmålet]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
5 |
4.2% |
0.04237288 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
103 |
87.3% |
0.87288136 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
8 |
6.8% |
0.06779661 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.7% |
0.01694915 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8397 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1e2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome, is among 10 participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of ten selected respondents who get to vote on how the
money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=5. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har
blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette
spørsmålet]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
9 |
7.4% |
0.07438017 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
103 |
85.1% |
0.85123967 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
9 |
7.4% |
0.07438017 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8394 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1f2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome, is among 3 participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of three selected respondents who get to vote on how the
money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=6. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har
blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette
spørsmålet]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
6 |
6.1% |
0.06060606 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
87 |
87.9% |
0.87878788 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
4 |
4.0% |
0.04040404 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
2.0% |
0.02020202 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8416 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1a2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You do not have the opportunity to influence this
decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the
money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=7. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har
blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette
spørsmålet]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
17 |
15.3% |
0.15315315 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
87 |
78.4% |
0.78378378 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
6.3% |
0.06306306 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8404 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1b2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You do have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to
be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=8. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har
blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette
spørsmålet]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
14 |
12.6% |
0.12612613 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
88 |
79.3% |
0.79279279 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
6.3% |
0.06306306 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.8% |
0.01801802 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8404 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1c2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 1000
participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of a thousand selected respondents who get to vote on
how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=9. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har
blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette
spørsmålet]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
9 |
8.4% |
0.08411215 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
87 |
81.3% |
0.81308411 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
6.5% |
0.06542056 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.7% |
0.03738318 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8408 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1d2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 100
participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of a hundred selected respondents who get to vote on how
the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=10. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har
blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette
spørsmålet]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
9 |
7.4% |
0.07438017 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
97 |
80.2% |
0.80165289 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
11 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.3% |
0.03305785 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8394 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1e2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 10
participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of ten selected respondents who get to vote on how the
money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=11. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har
blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette
spørsmålet]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
8 |
6.7% |
0.067226891 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
101 |
84.9% |
0.848739496 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
9 |
7.6% |
0.075630252 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008403361 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8396 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1f2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 3
participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of three selected respondents who get to vote on how the
money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=12. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har
blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette
spørsmålet]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
3 |
2.6% |
0.02608696 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
106 |
92.2% |
0.92173913 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
6 |
5.2% |
0.05217391 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8400 |
|
NA |
w03_ran17
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3, except respondents recruited in wave 1 that earlier
have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1368] [Invalid:7147]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
321 |
23.5% |
0.2346491 |
| 2 |
2 |
361 |
26.4% |
0.2638889 |
| 3 |
3 |
353 |
25.8% |
0.2580409 |
| 4 |
4 |
333 |
24.3% |
0.2434211 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7147 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad313_1a2a
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable decision: Draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to
participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a draw for a travel gift card
worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel. To what
extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran17=1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
24 |
7.5% |
0.07476636 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
48 |
15.0% |
0.14953271 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
120 |
37.4% |
0.37383178 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
73 |
22.7% |
0.22741433 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
49 |
15.3% |
0.15264798 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.2% |
0.02180685 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8194 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad313_1b2a
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable decision: A donation of NOK 5,000 given to Doctors without
borders
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a donation of NOK 5,000 to
Doctors without borders. To what extent do you think this decision is
acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran17=2. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
228 |
63.2% |
0.631578947 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
93 |
25.8% |
0.257617729 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
25 |
6.9% |
0.069252078 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
7 |
1.9% |
0.019390582 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
6 |
1.7% |
0.016620499 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005540166 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8154 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad313_1a2b
|
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept decision: Draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000
to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a draw for a travel gift card
worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel. How
willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran17=3. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
36 |
10.2% |
0.10198300 |
| 2 |
Willing |
129 |
36.5% |
0.36543909 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
77 |
21.8% |
0.21813031 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
67 |
19.0% |
0.18980170 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
39 |
11.0% |
0.11048159 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.4% |
0.01416431 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8162 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad313_1b2b
|
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept decision: A donation of NOK 5,000 given to Doctors
without borders
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a donation of NOK 5,000 to
Doctors without borders. How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran17=4. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
242 |
72.7% |
0.726726727 |
| 2 |
Willing |
66 |
19.8% |
0.198198198 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
11 |
3.3% |
0.033033033 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006006006 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
5 |
1.5% |
0.015015015 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.1% |
0.021021021 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8182 |
|
NA |
w03_pad315
|
Variable label:
|
Number of public officials in Norway involved in corruption
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how many public officials in Norway are involved in
corruption?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Almost none |
179 |
10.7% |
0.10737852 |
| 2 |
Very few |
760 |
45.6% |
0.45590882 |
| 3 |
Some |
515 |
30.9% |
0.30893821 |
| 4 |
Quite a lot |
148 |
8.9% |
0.08878224 |
| 5 |
Almost all |
7 |
0.4% |
0.00419916 |
| 97 |
No answer |
58 |
3.5% |
0.03479304 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad316
|
Variable label:
|
Number of politicians in Norway involved in corruption
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how many politicians in Norway are involved in
corruption?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Almost none |
340 |
20.4% |
0.2039592 |
| 2 |
Very few |
749 |
44.9% |
0.4493101 |
| 3 |
Some |
383 |
23.0% |
0.2297540 |
| 4 |
Quite a lot |
100 |
6.0% |
0.0599880 |
| 5 |
Almost all |
10 |
0.6% |
0.0059988 |
| 97 |
No answer |
85 |
5.1% |
0.0509898 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad318
|
Variable label:
|
Time spent reading VG online, on a mobile phone, or a tablet computer on
an ordinary day
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much time do you spend reading VG online, on a mobile phone, or a
tablet computer on an ordinary day?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rarely or never |
568 |
34.1% |
0.34073185 |
| 2 |
Less than 30 minutes |
637 |
38.2% |
0.38212358 |
| 3 |
30 to 60 minutes |
337 |
20.2% |
0.20215957 |
| 4 |
1 to 2 hours |
68 |
4.1% |
0.04079184 |
| 5 |
2 to 3 hours |
16 |
1.0% |
0.00959808 |
| 6 |
3 to 4 hours |
7 |
0.4% |
0.00419916 |
| 7 |
More than 4 hours |
2 |
0.1% |
0.00119976 |
| 97 |
No answer |
32 |
1.9% |
0.01919616 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_ran18
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1648] [Invalid:6867]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
189 |
11.5% |
0.1146845 |
| 2 |
2 |
244 |
14.8% |
0.1480583 |
| 3 |
3 |
194 |
11.8% |
0.1177184 |
| 4 |
4 |
211 |
12.8% |
0.1280340 |
| 5 |
5 |
194 |
11.8% |
0.1177184 |
| 6 |
6 |
196 |
11.9% |
0.1189320 |
| 7 |
7 |
207 |
12.6% |
0.1256068 |
| 8 |
8 |
213 |
12.9% |
0.1292476 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6867 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319aa
|
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian
online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have
clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on
an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support for Progress Party drops on new poll |
86 |
45.5% |
0.45502646 |
| 2 |
Support for Labour Party surges on new poll |
88 |
46.6% |
0.46560847 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
7.9% |
0.07936508 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8326 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319ab
|
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian
online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have
clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on
an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support for Labour Party surges on new poll |
119 |
48.8% |
0.4877049 |
| 2 |
Support for Progress Party drops on new poll |
96 |
39.3% |
0.3934426 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
11.9% |
0.1188525 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8271 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319ba
|
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian
online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have
clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on
an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support for Labour Party drops on new poll |
86 |
44.3% |
0.4432990 |
| 2 |
Support for Progress Party surges on new poll |
84 |
43.3% |
0.4329897 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
12.4% |
0.1237113 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8321 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319bb
|
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian
online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have
clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on
an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Support for Progress Party surges on new poll |
83 |
39.3% |
0.39336493 |
| 2 |
Support for Labour Party drops on new poll |
107 |
50.7% |
0.50710900 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
10.0% |
0.09952607 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8304 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319ca
|
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian
online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have
clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on
an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No change in support for Labour Party on new poll |
98 |
50.5% |
0.5051546 |
| 2 |
No change in support for Progress Party on new poll |
51 |
26.3% |
0.2628866 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
23.2% |
0.2319588 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8321 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319cb
|
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian
online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have
clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on
an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No change in support for Progress Party on new poll |
75 |
38.3% |
0.3826531 |
| 2 |
No change in support for Labour Party on new poll |
83 |
42.3% |
0.4234694 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
19.4% |
0.1938776 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8319 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319da
|
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian
online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have
clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on
an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strong growth in the Norwegian economy |
60 |
29.0% |
0.28985507 |
| 2 |
Sharp decline in the Norwegian economy |
139 |
67.1% |
0.67149758 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
3.9% |
0.03864734 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8308 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319db
|
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian
online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have
clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on
an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=8]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Sharp decline in the Norwegian economy |
142 |
66.7% |
0.66666667 |
| 2 |
Strong growth in the Norwegian economy |
64 |
30.0% |
0.30046948 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.3% |
0.03286385 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8302 |
|
NA |
w03_pad320
|
Variable label:
|
Positive or negative impression of NAV
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
39 |
1.3% |
0.01332422 |
| 2 |
Positive |
423 |
14.5% |
0.14451657 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
556 |
19.0% |
0.18995559 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
646 |
22.1% |
0.22070379 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
692 |
23.6% |
0.23641954 |
| 6 |
Negative |
307 |
10.5% |
0.10488555 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
162 |
5.5% |
0.05534677 |
| 97 |
No answer |
102 |
3.5% |
0.03484797 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_pad321
|
Variable label:
|
Been in personal contact with NAV
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you personally been in contact with NAV?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1669 |
57.0% |
0.57020840 |
| 2 |
No |
1162 |
39.7% |
0.39699351 |
| 97 |
No answer |
96 |
3.3% |
0.03279809 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_pad322_1
|
Variable label:
|
Proposal: The authorities propose merging your municipality of residence
with one or more neighbouring municipalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion on the following two imaginary suggestions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that the authorities propose merging your municipality of
residence with one or more neighbouring municipalities.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good suggestion |
185 |
11.1% |
0.11097780 |
| 2 |
Good suggestion |
419 |
25.1% |
0.25134973 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good suggestion |
240 |
14.4% |
0.14397121 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad suggestion |
281 |
16.9% |
0.16856629 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad suggestion |
164 |
9.8% |
0.09838032 |
| 6 |
Bad suggestion |
170 |
10.2% |
0.10197960 |
| 7 |
Very bad suggestion |
163 |
9.8% |
0.09778044 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
2.7% |
0.02699460 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad322_2
|
Variable label:
|
Proposal: Your municipality proposes to supply, to a greater extent than
it does currently, the municipal services in cooperation with one or
more neighbouring municipalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion on the following two imaginary suggestions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that your municipality proposes to supply, to a greater extent
than it does currently, the municipal services in cooperation with one
or more neighbouring municipalities.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good suggestion |
191 |
11.5% |
0.11457708 |
| 2 |
Good suggestion |
504 |
30.2% |
0.30233953 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good suggestion |
332 |
19.9% |
0.19916017 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad suggestion |
262 |
15.7% |
0.15716857 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad suggestion |
134 |
8.0% |
0.08038392 |
| 6 |
Bad suggestion |
103 |
6.2% |
0.06178764 |
| 7 |
Very bad suggestion |
78 |
4.7% |
0.04679064 |
| 97 |
No answer |
63 |
3.8% |
0.03779244 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad323
|
Variable label:
|
Willing to pay an extra NOK 1,000 in tax per year to maintain the
current municipal structure
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some estimates suggest that the current municipal structure is causing
society extra expense. If you could choose, are you willing to pay an
extra NOK 1,000 in tax per year to maintain the current municipal
structure?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
379 |
22.7% |
0.22735453 |
| 2 |
No |
882 |
52.9% |
0.52909418 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
2.3% |
0.02339532 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
367 |
22.0% |
0.22015597 |
w03_pad325_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Inter-municipal cooperation increases the quality of public
services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with these two statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cooperation between the municipalities on the supply of services
(inter-municipal cooperation) gives better quality than if individual
municipalities supply the services themselves
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
194 |
11.6% |
0.11637672 |
| 2 |
Agree |
478 |
28.7% |
0.28674265 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
406 |
24.4% |
0.24355129 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
300 |
18.0% |
0.17996401 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
109 |
6.5% |
0.06538692 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
91 |
5.5% |
0.05458908 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
29 |
1.7% |
0.01739652 |
| 97 |
No answer |
60 |
3.6% |
0.03599280 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad325_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Inter-municipal cooperation makes it harder for voters to
know who is responsible for the contents of the policies that are
implemented
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with these two statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Inter-municipal cooperation makes it harder for voters to know who is
responsible for the contents of the policies that are implemented
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
70 |
4.2% |
0.04199160 |
| 2 |
Agree |
255 |
15.3% |
0.15296941 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
456 |
27.4% |
0.27354529 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
407 |
24.4% |
0.24415117 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
169 |
10.1% |
0.10137972 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
187 |
11.2% |
0.11217756 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
2.8% |
0.02759448 |
| 97 |
No answer |
77 |
4.6% |
0.04619076 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad327
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think results in the best services for you and your
municipality?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think results in the best services for you and your
municipality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
That the municipality supplies the services itself |
362 |
21.7% |
0.2171566 |
| 2 |
That the municipality cooperates more with other municipalities |
667 |
40.0% |
0.4001200 |
| 3 |
That the municipality merges with other municipalities |
382 |
22.9% |
0.2291542 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
2.7% |
0.0269946 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
211 |
12.7% |
0.1265747 |
w03_ran19
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1643] [Invalid:6872]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
391 |
23.8% |
0.2379793 |
| 2 |
2 |
381 |
23.2% |
0.2318929 |
| 3 |
3 |
443 |
27.0% |
0.2696287 |
| 4 |
4 |
428 |
26.0% |
0.2604991 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6872 |
|
NA |
w03_aq3a
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most men are better suited emotionally for politics than are
most women.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Most men are better suited
emotionally for politics than are most women.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran19=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
46 |
11.8% |
0.11764706 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
340 |
87.0% |
0.86956522 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.3% |
0.01278772 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8124 |
|
NA |
w03_aq3b
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most men are not better suited emotionally for politics than
are most women.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Most men are not better
suited emotionally for politics than are most women.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran19=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree |
301 |
79.0% |
0.79002625 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
70 |
18.4% |
0.18372703 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.6% |
0.02624672 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8134 |
|
NA |
w03_aq3c
|
Variable label:
|
Men and women, who is better suited emotionally for politics
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most men are better suited emotionally for politics
than are most women, that men and women are equally suited, or that
women are better suited than men in this area?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran19=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Men are better suited |
17 |
3.8% |
0.03837472 |
| 2 |
Men and women equally |
411 |
92.8% |
0.92776524 |
| 3 |
Women are better suited |
7 |
1.6% |
0.01580135 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.8% |
0.01805869 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8072 |
|
NA |
w03_aq3d
|
Variable label:
|
Women and men, who is better suited emotionally for politics
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most women are better suited emotionally for politics
than are most men, that men and women are equally suited, or that men
are better suited than women in this area?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran19=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Women are better suited |
15 |
3.5% |
0.035046729 |
| 2 |
Men and women equally |
395 |
92.3% |
0.922897196 |
| 3 |
Men are better suited |
14 |
3.3% |
0.032710280 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009345794 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8087 |
|
NA |
w03_ran20
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1638] [Invalid:6877]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
828 |
50.5% |
0.5054945 |
| 2 |
2 |
810 |
49.5% |
0.4945055 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6877 |
|
NA |
w03_qw1a
|
Variable label:
|
Person with anti-religious attitudes, allow the freedom to speak
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are some people who are against all churches and religion. If such
a person wanted to make a speech in your (city/town/community) against
churches and religion, should he be allowed the freedom to speak, or
not?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran20=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, allowed to speak |
701 |
84.7% |
0.84661836 |
| 2 |
Not, not allowed |
106 |
12.8% |
0.12801932 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02536232 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7687 |
|
NA |
w03_qw1b
|
Variable label:
|
Person with anti-religious attitudes, allowed to speak
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are some people who are against all churches and religion. If such
a person wanted to make a speech in your (city/town/community) against
churches and religion, should he be allowed to speak, or not?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran20=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, allowed to speak |
671 |
82.8% |
0.82839506 |
| 2 |
Not, not allowed |
119 |
14.7% |
0.14691358 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.5% |
0.02469136 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7705 |
|
NA |
w03_ran21
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1636] [Invalid:6879]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
793 |
48.5% |
0.4847188 |
| 2 |
2 |
843 |
51.5% |
0.5152812 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6879 |
|
NA |
w03_ro4a
|
Variable label:
|
Average temperatures around the world higher in the last three years
than before that, lower, or about the same
|
|
Literal question:
|
As far as you know, would you say that average temperatures around the
world have been higher in the last three years than before that, lower,
or about the same?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran21=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Higher |
623 |
78.6% |
0.785624212 |
| 2 |
Lower |
7 |
0.9% |
0.008827238 |
| 3 |
About the same |
147 |
18.5% |
0.185372005 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.0% |
0.020176545 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7722 |
|
NA |
w03_ro4b
|
Variable label:
|
Average temperatures around the world lower in the last three years than
before that, higher, or about the same
|
|
Literal question:
|
As far as you know, would you say that average temperatures around the
world have been lower in the last three years than before that, higher,
or about the same?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran21=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Higher |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01779359 |
| 2 |
Lower |
666 |
79.0% |
0.79003559 |
| 3 |
About the same |
140 |
16.6% |
0.16607355 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
2.6% |
0.02609727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7672 |
|
NA |
w03_ran22
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1636] [Invalid:6879]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
424 |
25.9% |
0.2591687 |
| 2 |
2 |
401 |
24.5% |
0.2451100 |
| 3 |
3 |
391 |
23.9% |
0.2389976 |
| 4 |
4 |
420 |
25.7% |
0.2567237 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6879 |
|
NA |
w03_qb1a
|
Variable label:
|
Serious fuel shortage this winter: Law requiring people to lower the
heat in their homes, or oppose such law
|
|
Literal question:
|
If there is a serious fuel shortage this winter, do you think there
should be a law requiring people to lower the heat in their homes, or do
you oppose such law?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran22=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Should be a law |
134 |
31.6% |
0.31603774 |
| 2 |
Oppose such a law |
275 |
64.9% |
0.64858491 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
3.5% |
0.03537736 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8091 |
|
NA |
w03_qb1b
|
Variable label:
|
Serious fuel shortage this winter: Law requiring people to lower the
heat in their homes
|
|
Literal question:
|
If there is a serious fuel shortage this winter, do you think there
should be a law requiring people to lower the heat in their homes?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran22=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, should be a law |
107 |
26.7% |
0.26683292 |
| 2 |
No, not a law |
282 |
70.3% |
0.70324190 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
3.0% |
0.02992519 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
w03_qb1c
|
Variable label:
|
Serious fuel shortage this winter: Law requiring people to lower the
heat in their homes, or oppose such a law because it would be too
difficult to enforce
|
|
Literal question:
|
If there is a serious fuel shortage this winter, do you think there
should be a law requiring people to lower the heat in their homes, or do
you oppose such a law because it would be too difficult to enforce?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran22=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Should be a law |
93 |
23.8% |
0.23785166 |
| 2 |
Oppose such a law |
285 |
72.9% |
0.72890026 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
3.3% |
0.03324808 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8124 |
|
NA |
w03_qb1d
|
Variable label:
|
Serious fuel shortage this winter: Law requiring people to lower the
heat in their homes, oppose or should there be such a law
|
|
Literal question:
|
If there is a serious fuel shortage this winter, do you oppose that
there should be a law requiring people to lower the heat in their homes,
or do you think there should be such law?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran22=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oppose such a law |
237 |
56.4% |
0.56428571 |
| 2 |
Should be a law |
177 |
42.1% |
0.42142857 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.4% |
0.01428571 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8095 |
|
NA |
w03_ran23
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1634] [Invalid:6881]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
802 |
49.1% |
0.4908201 |
| 2 |
2 |
832 |
50.9% |
0.5091799 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6881 |
|
NA |
w03_qo11a
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a
legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a
legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran23=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
668 |
83.3% |
0.83291771 |
| 2 |
No |
110 |
13.7% |
0.13715711 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
3.0% |
0.02992519 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7713 |
|
NA |
w03_qo12a
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a
legal abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the
baby?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a
legal abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the
baby?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran23=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
688 |
85.8% |
0.85785536 |
| 2 |
No |
82 |
10.2% |
0.10224439 |
| 97 |
No answer |
32 |
4.0% |
0.03990025 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7713 |
|
NA |
w03_qo12b
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a
legal abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the
baby?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a
legal abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the
baby?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran23=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
695 |
83.5% |
0.83533654 |
| 2 |
No |
114 |
13.7% |
0.13701923 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
2.8% |
0.02764423 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7683 |
|
NA |
w03_qo11b
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a
legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a
legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran23=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
606 |
72.8% |
0.7283654 |
| 2 |
No |
200 |
24.0% |
0.2403846 |
| 97 |
No answer |
26 |
3.1% |
0.0312500 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7683 |
|
NA |
w03_ran24
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1633] [Invalid:6882]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
836 |
51.2% |
0.5119412 |
| 2 |
2 |
797 |
48.8% |
0.4880588 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6882 |
|
NA |
w03_ro6a
|
Variable label:
|
Agreee or disagree: Inequality continues to exist because it benefits
the rich and powerful
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree that inequality continues to exist because it
benefits the rich and powerful? Would you say…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran24=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
141 |
16.9% |
0.16866029 |
| 2 |
Agree |
332 |
39.7% |
0.39712919 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
210 |
25.1% |
0.25119617 |
| 4 |
Disagree |
102 |
12.2% |
0.12200957 |
| 5 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
3.7% |
0.03708134 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02392344 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7679 |
|
NA |
w03_ro6b
|
Variable label:
|
Disagree or agree: Inequality continues to exist because it benefits the
rich and powerful
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you disagree or agree that inequality continues to exist because it
benefits the rich and powerful? Would you say…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran24=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly disagree |
118 |
14.8% |
0.14805521 |
| 2 |
Disagree |
321 |
40.3% |
0.40276035 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
201 |
25.2% |
0.25219573 |
| 4 |
Agree |
104 |
13.0% |
0.13048934 |
| 5 |
Strongly agree |
36 |
4.5% |
0.04516939 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.1% |
0.02132999 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7718 |
|
NA |
w03_fin1
|
Variable label:
|
Should child benefit be increased?
|
|
Literal question:
|
There has recently been a discussion about if child benefit should be
increased. What is your position on a proposal to increase child
benefit? Should child benefit be increased?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
878 |
52.7% |
0.52669466 |
| 2 |
No |
680 |
40.8% |
0.40791842 |
| 97 |
No answer |
109 |
6.5% |
0.06538692 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_ran25
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1631] [Invalid:6884]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
819 |
50.2% |
0.5021459 |
| 2 |
2 |
812 |
49.8% |
0.4978541 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6884 |
|
NA |
w03_fin1a
|
Variable label:
|
Increasing child benefit: Immigrant families are entitled to the same
child benefit as Norwegian families
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now it is the case that newly arrived immigrant families are entitled to
the same child benefit as Norwegian families.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you still think that child benefit should be increased?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3, FIN1=1, and ran25=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
384 |
84.8% |
0.847682119 |
| 2 |
No |
32 |
7.1% |
0.070640177 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002207506 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8062 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
36 |
7.9% |
0.079470199 |
w03_fin1b
|
Variable label:
|
Increasing child benefit: Labour migrants from the EEA are entitled to
the same child benefit as Norwegian families
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now it is the case that labour migrants from the European Economic Area
are entitled to the same child benefit as Norwegian families even if
they have children living in their home countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you still think that child benefit should be increased?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3, FIN1=1, and ran25=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
238 |
56.0% |
0.560000000 |
| 2 |
No |
115 |
27.1% |
0.270588235 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004705882 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8090 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
70 |
16.5% |
0.164705882 |
w03_fin2a
|
Variable label:
|
Increasing child benefit: Only for children of Norwegian citizens
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have supported the proposal to increase child benefit if the
scheme only applied to children of Norwegian citizens?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3, FIN1=2, and ran25=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
29 |
3.7% |
0.03722721 |
| 2 |
No |
269 |
34.5% |
0.34531451 |
| 97 |
No answer |
453 |
58.2% |
0.58151476 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7736 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
28 |
3.6% |
0.03594352 |
w03_fin2b
|
Variable label:
|
Increasing child benefit: Only for children living in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have supported the proposal to increase child benefit if the
scheme only applied to children living in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3, FIN1=2, og ran25=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
68 |
8.8% |
0.08751609 |
| 2 |
No |
222 |
28.6% |
0.28571429 |
| 97 |
No answer |
425 |
54.7% |
0.54697555 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7738 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
62 |
8.0% |
0.07979408 |
w03_ran30
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1631] [Invalid:6884]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
812 |
49.8% |
0.4978541 |
| 2 |
2 |
819 |
50.2% |
0.5021459 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6884 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc5
|
Variable label:
|
Number of conditions that are upsetting [List 2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Indicate how many of these four situations upset you. We are only
interested in how many upset you, not which ones.
That new Norwegian roads are often funded by collecting tolls
That
sportspeople earn tens of millions of kroner
That many do not
believe in climate change caused by human activities
That we have to
pay the NRK licence fee
That those who are ill due to smoking
receive treatment that is equally good and expensive as non-smoking
patients
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran30=1. The situations in R3CC5 are listed in a
randomized order. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
58 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
| 1 |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
2 |
193 |
23.8% |
0.23768473 |
| 3 |
3 |
266 |
32.8% |
0.32758621 |
| 4 |
4 |
191 |
23.5% |
0.23522167 |
| 5 |
5 |
63 |
7.8% |
0.07758621 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01847291 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7703 |
|
NA |
| 6 |
6 |
26 |
3.2% |
0.03201970 |
w03_r3cc6
|
Variable label:
|
Number of conditions that are upsetting [List 3]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Indicate how many of these four situations upset you. We are only
interested in how many upset you, not which ones.
That new Norwegian roads are often funded by collecting tolls
That
sportspeople earn tens of millions of kroner
That many do not
believe in climate change caused by human activities
That we have to
pay the NRK licence fee
That begging is legal in Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran30=2. The situations in R3CC6 are listed in a
randomized order. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
33 |
4.0% |
0.04029304 |
| 1 |
1 |
169 |
20.6% |
0.20634921 |
| 2 |
2 |
224 |
27.4% |
0.27350427 |
| 3 |
3 |
209 |
25.5% |
0.25518926 |
| 4 |
4 |
117 |
14.3% |
0.14285714 |
| 5 |
5 |
51 |
6.2% |
0.06227106 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.0% |
0.01953602 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7696 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv1
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants settle here
|
|
Literal question:
|
Now we will ask some questions on immigration and integration. In your
opinion, how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that
immigrants settle here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very great advantage |
56 |
3.3% |
0.03252033 |
| 2 |
Great advantage |
304 |
17.7% |
0.17653891 |
| 3 |
An advantage to some extent |
658 |
38.2% |
0.38211382 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
224 |
13.0% |
0.13008130 |
| 5 |
A disadvantage to some extent |
301 |
17.5% |
0.17479675 |
| 6 |
Great disadvantage |
93 |
5.4% |
0.05400697 |
| 7 |
Very great disadvantage |
52 |
3.0% |
0.03019744 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
2.0% |
0.01974448 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv4
|
Variable label:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
195 |
11.3% |
0.11324042 |
| 2 |
Important |
671 |
39.0% |
0.38966318 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
618 |
35.9% |
0.35888502 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
182 |
10.6% |
0.10569106 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
33 |
1.9% |
0.01916376 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.3% |
0.01335656 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv6
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy
|
|
Literal question:
|
What party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
348 |
20.2% |
0.202090592 |
| 2 |
The Progress Party |
360 |
20.9% |
0.209059233 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party |
264 |
15.3% |
0.153310105 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
117 |
6.8% |
0.067944251 |
| 5 |
The Centre Party |
19 |
1.1% |
0.011033682 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
82 |
4.8% |
0.047619048 |
| 7 |
The Liberal Party |
98 |
5.7% |
0.056910569 |
| 8 |
Red |
22 |
1.3% |
0.012775842 |
| 9 |
The Green Party |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002903600 |
| 10 |
Other, please specify |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009291521 |
| 11 |
None |
268 |
15.6% |
0.155632985 |
| 97 |
No answer |
123 |
7.1% |
0.071428571 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv6_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Party with the best immigration policy [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3d7
|
Variable label:
|
Number of immigrants in the local neighbourhood or school district
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the people in the local neighbourhood or school
district where you live, roughly how many have immigrated or have at
least one parent who has immigrated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Everyone, or almost everyone |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008130081 |
| 2 |
Many (more than half) |
81 |
4.7% |
0.047038328 |
| 3 |
About half |
136 |
7.9% |
0.078977933 |
| 4 |
Some (fewer than half) |
1066 |
61.9% |
0.619047619 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
369 |
21.4% |
0.214285714 |
| 97 |
No answer |
56 |
3.3% |
0.032520325 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv10
|
Variable label:
|
Number of immigrants encountered on an ordinary day
|
|
Literal question:
|
Think about people you meet by chance on an ordinary day, for example on
the bus, in the shops or in the local neighbourhood. How often would you
say that you tend to meet immigrants?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Daily |
1190 |
69.1% |
0.69105691 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
316 |
18.4% |
0.18350755 |
| 3 |
A couple of times a month |
123 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
| 4 |
Less often, but it has happened |
47 |
2.7% |
0.02729384 |
| 5 |
Never |
3 |
0.2% |
0.00174216 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
2.5% |
0.02497096 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv12
|
Variable label:
|
Good or bad experience encountered on an ordinary day
|
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad an experience have these brief, chance meetings been?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and if R3DV10 is less than 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
132 |
7.9% |
0.078758950 |
| 2 |
Good |
601 |
35.9% |
0.358591885 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
133 |
7.9% |
0.079355609 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
696 |
41.5% |
0.415274463 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
85 |
5.1% |
0.050715990 |
| 6 |
Bad |
19 |
1.1% |
0.011336516 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002386635 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003579952 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6839 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv14
|
Variable label:
|
Number of immigrants in social circle
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many in your social circle have immigrated to Norway or have parents
(mother, father or both parents) who have immigrated to Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Everyone, or almost everyone |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009291521 |
| 2 |
Many (more than half) |
64 |
3.7% |
0.037166086 |
| 3 |
About half |
68 |
3.9% |
0.039488966 |
| 4 |
Some (fewer than half) |
594 |
34.5% |
0.344947735 |
| 5 |
None, or almost none |
943 |
54.8% |
0.547619048 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
2.1% |
0.021486643 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv29_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Begging should be prohibited in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 or if the respondent is recruited in wave 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1000 |
24.6% |
0.24636610 |
| 2 |
Agree |
869 |
21.4% |
0.21409214 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
700 |
17.2% |
0.17245627 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
454 |
11.2% |
0.11185021 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
330 |
8.1% |
0.08130081 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
370 |
9.1% |
0.09115546 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
201 |
5.0% |
0.04951959 |
| 97 |
No answer |
135 |
3.3% |
0.03325942 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4456 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv29_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims come
to live here
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims come to live
here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 or if the respondent is recruited in wave 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
473 |
11.7% |
0.11653117 |
| 2 |
Agree |
491 |
12.1% |
0.12096576 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
836 |
20.6% |
0.20596206 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
580 |
14.3% |
0.14289234 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
490 |
12.1% |
0.12071939 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
732 |
18.0% |
0.18033999 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
324 |
8.0% |
0.07982262 |
| 97 |
No answer |
133 |
3.3% |
0.03276669 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4456 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv29_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in
the world than to people in this country
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with
them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world
than to people in this country.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 or if the respondent is recruited in wave 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
416 |
10.2% |
0.10248830 |
| 2 |
Agree |
671 |
16.5% |
0.16531165 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
810 |
20.0% |
0.19955654 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1191 |
29.3% |
0.29342203 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
346 |
8.5% |
0.08524267 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
366 |
9.0% |
0.09016999 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
106 |
2.6% |
0.02611481 |
| 97 |
No answer |
153 |
3.8% |
0.03769401 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4456 |
|
NA |
w03_ran26
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1706] [Invalid:6809]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
874 |
51.2% |
0.5123095 |
| 2 |
2 |
832 |
48.8% |
0.4876905 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv30a
|
Variable label:
|
Muslim immigrants to Norway are entitled to have their traditions and
cultures protected
|
|
Literal question:
|
Muslim immigrants to Norway are entitled to have their traditions and
cultures protected.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran26=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
33 |
3.8% |
0.03775744 |
| 2 |
Agree |
132 |
15.1% |
0.15102975 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
229 |
26.2% |
0.26201373 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
125 |
14.3% |
0.14302059 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
150 |
17.2% |
0.17162471 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
102 |
11.7% |
0.11670481 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
89 |
10.2% |
0.10183066 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.6% |
0.01601831 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7641 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv30b
|
Variable label:
|
Muslim immigrants to Norway are entitled to have their traditions and
cultures respected
|
|
Literal question:
|
Muslim immigrants to Norway are entitled to have their traditions and
cultures respected.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran26=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
68 |
8.2% |
0.08173077 |
| 2 |
Agree |
223 |
26.8% |
0.26802885 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
243 |
29.2% |
0.29206731 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
79 |
9.5% |
0.09495192 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
107 |
12.9% |
0.12860577 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
47 |
5.6% |
0.05649038 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
56 |
6.7% |
0.06730769 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01081731 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7683 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv35_1
|
Variable label:
|
Personal description: It is important for me personally to be
unprejudiced in regard to immigrants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions suit
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to
immigrants.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
302 |
17.5% |
0.17537747 |
| 2 |
Well |
591 |
34.3% |
0.34320557 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
326 |
18.9% |
0.18931475 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
297 |
17.2% |
0.17247387 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
83 |
4.8% |
0.04819977 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
34 |
2.0% |
0.01974448 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
25 |
1.5% |
0.01451800 |
| 97 |
No answer |
64 |
3.7% |
0.03716609 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv35_2
|
Variable label:
|
Personal description: I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to
myself
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions suit
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
369 |
21.4% |
0.21428571 |
| 2 |
Well |
565 |
32.8% |
0.32810685 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
236 |
13.7% |
0.13704994 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
307 |
17.8% |
0.17828107 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
83 |
4.8% |
0.04819977 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
47 |
2.7% |
0.02729384 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
36 |
2.1% |
0.02090592 |
| 97 |
No answer |
79 |
4.6% |
0.04587689 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv35_3
|
Variable label:
|
Personal description: I feel guilty if I think negatively about
immigrants
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions suit
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
99 |
5.7% |
0.05749129 |
| 2 |
Well |
228 |
13.2% |
0.13240418 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
263 |
15.3% |
0.15272938 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
468 |
27.2% |
0.27177700 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
171 |
9.9% |
0.09930314 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
262 |
15.2% |
0.15214866 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
154 |
8.9% |
0.08943089 |
| 97 |
No answer |
77 |
4.5% |
0.04471545 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv35_4
|
Variable label:
|
Personal description: I try to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants
due to my own convictions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions suit
you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants due to my own
convictions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
281 |
16.3% |
0.16318235 |
| 2 |
Well |
594 |
34.5% |
0.34494774 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
322 |
18.7% |
0.18699187 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
311 |
18.1% |
0.18060395 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
76 |
4.4% |
0.04413473 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
37 |
2.1% |
0.02148664 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01626016 |
| 97 |
No answer |
73 |
4.2% |
0.04239257 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv36
|
Variable label:
|
Was directly affected ny attack on July 22th [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you know, Anders Behring Breivik carried out the biggest terrorist
attack on Norwegian soil during peacetime on 22 July 2011. 77 people
lost their lives. Many in Norway were directly affected either because
they were closely related to or knew some of the victims, or were close
to what happened in another way. What about you, were you directly
affected?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents where U=4] [Text data will not be
distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made
available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel
at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:8515]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3dv36_5_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Was directly affected ny attack on July 22th [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you know, Anders Behring Breivik carried out the biggest terrorist
attack on Norwegian soil during peacetime on 22 July 2011. 77 people
lost their lives. Many in Norway were directly affected either because
they were closely related to or knew some of the victims, or were close
to what happened in another way. What about you, were you directly
affected?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents where U=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3dv37_1
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction: I remember where I was when I heard the news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many had strong reactions in the wake of the terrorist attacks. How well
or poorly do these descriptions match your reaction, as you remember it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I remember where I was when I heard the news.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents where U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
852 |
75.3% |
0.75265018 |
| 2 |
Well |
134 |
11.8% |
0.11837456 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
37 |
3.3% |
0.03268551 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
26 |
2.3% |
0.02296820 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
19 |
1.7% |
0.01678445 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
23 |
2.0% |
0.02031802 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01413428 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
2.2% |
0.02208481 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7383 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv37_2
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction: I remember who I was with when I heard the news
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many had strong reactions in the wake of the terrorist attacks. How well
or poorly do these descriptions match your reaction, as you remember it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I remember who I was with when I heard the news.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents where U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
825 |
72.9% |
0.72879859 |
| 2 |
Well |
128 |
11.3% |
0.11307420 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
39 |
3.4% |
0.03445230 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
38 |
3.4% |
0.03356890 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
24 |
2.1% |
0.02120141 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
32 |
2.8% |
0.02826855 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
17 |
1.5% |
0.01501767 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
2.6% |
0.02561837 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7383 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv37_3
|
Variable label:
|
Reaction: I discussed 22 July with friends and acquaintances
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many had strong reactions in the wake of the terrorist attacks. How well
or poorly do these descriptions match your reaction, as you remember it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I discussed 22 July with friends and acquaintances.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents where U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
779 |
68.8% |
0.688162544 |
| 2 |
Well |
190 |
16.8% |
0.167844523 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
68 |
6.0% |
0.060070671 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
28 |
2.5% |
0.024734982 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
12 |
1.1% |
0.010600707 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
18 |
1.6% |
0.015901060 |
| 7 |
Very poorly |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005300353 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
2.7% |
0.027385159 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7383 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv371
|
Variable label:
|
Participated in commemorations in the wake of the terrorist attacks
|
|
Literal question:
|
Did you participate in commemorations in the wake of the terrorist
attacks?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents where U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
318 |
28.1% |
0.28091873 |
| 2 |
No |
797 |
70.4% |
0.70406360 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.5% |
0.01501767 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7383 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv39
|
Variable label:
|
Currently think about, read or talk about something that is related to
22 July
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s now been more than three years since the attacks. When it comes to
you personally, how often would you say that you now think about, read
or talk about something that is related to 22 July?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Daily |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006387921 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
142 |
8.2% |
0.082462253 |
| 3 |
A couple of times a month |
463 |
26.9% |
0.268873403 |
| 4 |
Less often, but it happens |
982 |
57.0% |
0.570267131 |
| 5 |
Never |
92 |
5.3% |
0.053426249 |
| 97 |
No answer |
32 |
1.9% |
0.018583043 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_ran27
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1706] [Invalid:6809]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
574 |
33.6% |
0.3364596 |
| 2 |
2 |
557 |
32.6% |
0.3264947 |
| 3 |
3 |
575 |
33.7% |
0.3370457 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Labour migration from Eastern Europe strengthens the
Norwegian economy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migration from Eastern Europe strengthens the Norwegian economy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
30 |
5.2% |
0.05226481 |
| 2 |
Agree |
111 |
19.3% |
0.19337979 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
152 |
26.5% |
0.26480836 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
137 |
23.9% |
0.23867596 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
60 |
10.5% |
0.10452962 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
47 |
8.2% |
0.08188153 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
28 |
4.9% |
0.04878049 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.6% |
0.01567944 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7941 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Labour migrants misuse the Norwegian welfare benefits
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants misuse the Norwegian welfare benefits
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
45 |
7.8% |
0.07839721 |
| 2 |
Agree |
87 |
15.2% |
0.15156794 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
185 |
32.2% |
0.32229965 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
114 |
19.9% |
0.19860627 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
65 |
11.3% |
0.11324042 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
57 |
9.9% |
0.09930314 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
2.1% |
0.02090592 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.6% |
0.01567944 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7941 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Labour migrants should not get the same access to national
insurance benefits as Norwegians do
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants should not get the same access to national insurance
benefits as Norwegians do
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
71 |
12.4% |
0.12369338 |
| 2 |
Agree |
85 |
14.8% |
0.14808362 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
130 |
22.6% |
0.22648084 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
93 |
16.2% |
0.16202091 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
73 |
12.7% |
0.12717770 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
84 |
14.6% |
0.14634146 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
26 |
4.5% |
0.04529617 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.1% |
0.02090592 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7941 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The government should use less money on national insurance
benefits
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government should use less money on national insurance benefits
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
30 |
5.2% |
0.05226481 |
| 2 |
Agree |
63 |
11.0% |
0.10975610 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
120 |
20.9% |
0.20905923 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
105 |
18.3% |
0.18292683 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
91 |
15.9% |
0.15853659 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
107 |
18.6% |
0.18641115 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
8.0% |
0.08013937 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.1% |
0.02090592 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7941 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the negativ press: Labour migration from Eastern Europe
strengthens the Norwegian economy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migrants from the European Economic Area are entitled to the
same national insurance rights as Norwegian citizens. Many choose to
send these benefits back to their home countries. Then we are talking
quite simply about the export of national insurance benefits. If this is
allowed to continue, people’s confidence in the welfare state will
crumble away.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migration from Eastern Europe strengthens the Norwegian economy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
24 |
4.3% |
0.04308797 |
| 2 |
Agree |
120 |
21.5% |
0.21543986 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
159 |
28.5% |
0.28545781 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
113 |
20.3% |
0.20287253 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
52 |
9.3% |
0.09335727 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
46 |
8.3% |
0.08258528 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
27 |
4.8% |
0.04847397 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.9% |
0.02872531 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7958 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the negativ press: Labour migrants misuse the Norwegian
welfare benefits
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migrants from the European Economic Area are entitled to the
same national insurance rights as Norwegian citizens. Many choose to
send these benefits back to their home countries. Then we are talking
quite simply about the export of national insurance benefits. If this is
allowed to continue, people’s confidence in the welfare state will
crumble away.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants from Eastern Europe misuse the Norwegian welfare
benefits
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
52 |
9.3% |
0.093357271 |
| 2 |
Agree |
99 |
17.8% |
0.177737882 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
181 |
32.5% |
0.324955117 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
125 |
22.4% |
0.224416517 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
45 |
8.1% |
0.080789946 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
34 |
6.1% |
0.061041293 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
0.9% |
0.008976661 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.9% |
0.028725314 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7958 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the negativ press: Labour migrants should not get the
same access to national insurance benefits as Norwegians do
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migrants from the European Economic Area are entitled to the
same national insurance rights as Norwegian citizens. Many choose to
send these benefits back to their home countries. Then we are talking
quite simply about the export of national insurance benefits. If this is
allowed to continue, people’s confidence in the welfare state will
crumble away.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants from Eastern Europe should not get the same access to
national insurance benefits as Norwegians have
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
69 |
12.4% |
0.12387792 |
| 2 |
Agree |
91 |
16.3% |
0.16337522 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
115 |
20.6% |
0.20646320 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
99 |
17.8% |
0.17773788 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
80 |
14.4% |
0.14362657 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
66 |
11.8% |
0.11849192 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02692998 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
3.9% |
0.03949731 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7958 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the negativ press: The government should use less money
on national insurance benefits
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migrants from the European Economic Area are entitled to the
same national insurance rights as Norwegian citizens. Many choose to
send these benefits back to their home countries. Then we are talking
quite simply about the export of national insurance benefits. If this is
allowed to continue, people’s confidence in the welfare state will
crumble away.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government should use less money on national insurance benefits
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
38 |
6.8% |
0.06822262 |
| 2 |
Agree |
67 |
12.0% |
0.12028725 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
125 |
22.4% |
0.22441652 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
114 |
20.5% |
0.20466786 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
66 |
11.8% |
0.11849192 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
95 |
17.1% |
0.17055655 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
29 |
5.2% |
0.05206463 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
4.1% |
0.04129264 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7958 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the positive press: Labour migration from Eastern
Europe strengthens the Norwegian economy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migration from Eastern Europe has been good for Norway. We
lack manpower. Without foreign workers there were many important tasks
that would not have been resolved. We think that the government’s
efforts to make it easier for foreigners to take work in Norway are
important.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migration from Eastern Europe strengthens the Norwegian economy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
34 |
5.9% |
0.05913043 |
| 2 |
Agree |
157 |
27.3% |
0.27304348 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
173 |
30.1% |
0.30086957 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
98 |
17.0% |
0.17043478 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
48 |
8.3% |
0.08347826 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
34 |
5.9% |
0.05913043 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
3.7% |
0.03652174 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.7% |
0.01739130 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7940 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the positive press: Labour migrants misuse the
Norwegian welfare benefits
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migration from Eastern Europe has been good for Norway. We
lack manpower. Without foreign workers there were many important tasks
that would not have been resolved. We think that the government’s
efforts to make it easier for foreigners to take work in Norway are
important.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants from Eastern Europe misuse the Norwegian welfare
benefits
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
58 |
10.1% |
0.10086957 |
| 2 |
Agree |
73 |
12.7% |
0.12695652 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
165 |
28.7% |
0.28695652 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
131 |
22.8% |
0.22782609 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
68 |
11.8% |
0.11826087 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
61 |
10.6% |
0.10608696 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
10 |
1.7% |
0.01739130 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.6% |
0.01565217 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7940 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2c_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the positive press: Labour migrants should not get the
same access to national insurance benefits as Norwegians do
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migration from Eastern Europe has been good for Norway. We
lack manpower. Without foreign workers there were many important tasks
that would not have been resolved. We think that the government’s
efforts to make it easier for foreigners to take work in Norway are
important.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants from Eastern Europe should not get the same access to
national insurance benefits as Norwegians have
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
69 |
12.0% |
0.12000000 |
| 2 |
Agree |
72 |
12.5% |
0.12521739 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
133 |
23.1% |
0.23130435 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
102 |
17.7% |
0.17739130 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
89 |
15.5% |
0.15478261 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
78 |
13.6% |
0.13565217 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
3.7% |
0.03652174 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.9% |
0.01913043 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7940 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2c_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the positive press: The government should use less
money on national insurance benefits
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migration from Eastern Europe has been good for Norway. We
lack manpower. Without foreign workers there were many important tasks
that would not have been resolved. We think that the government’s
efforts to make it easier for foreigners to take work in Norway are
important.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government should use less money on national insurance benefits
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
42 |
7.3% |
0.07304348 |
| 2 |
Agree |
87 |
15.1% |
0.15130435 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
115 |
20.0% |
0.20000000 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
128 |
22.3% |
0.22260870 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
76 |
13.2% |
0.13217391 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
77 |
13.4% |
0.13391304 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
38 |
6.6% |
0.06608696 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.1% |
0.02086957 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7940 |
|
NA |
w03_ran28
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1703] [Invalid:6812]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
554 |
32.5% |
0.3253083 |
| 2 |
2 |
566 |
33.2% |
0.3323547 |
| 3 |
3 |
583 |
34.2% |
0.3423371 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6812 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3a
|
Variable label:
|
National insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security: How
much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian national insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial
security. All in all, how much money should be used on the welfare
state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
45 |
8.1% |
0.08122744 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
192 |
34.7% |
0.34657040 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
243 |
43.9% |
0.43862816 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
62 |
11.2% |
0.11191336 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
6 |
1.1% |
0.01083032 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.1% |
0.01083032 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7961 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3aa_1
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social
goals: Social assistance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
social goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social assistance
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
34 |
6.1% |
0.06137184 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
174 |
31.4% |
0.31407942 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
246 |
44.4% |
0.44404332 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
78 |
14.1% |
0.14079422 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
14 |
2.5% |
0.02527076 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.4% |
0.01444043 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7961 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3aa_2
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social
goals: Unemployment benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
social goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
17 |
3.1% |
0.03068592 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
124 |
22.4% |
0.22382671 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
290 |
52.3% |
0.52346570 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
96 |
17.3% |
0.17328520 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
16 |
2.9% |
0.02888087 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.0% |
0.01985560 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7961 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3aa_3
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social
goals: Disability benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
social goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
43 |
7.8% |
0.07761733 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
176 |
31.8% |
0.31768953 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
224 |
40.4% |
0.40433213 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
85 |
15.3% |
0.15342960 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02707581 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.0% |
0.01985560 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7961 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3aa_4
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social
goals: Cash-for-care benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
social goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cash-for-care benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
14 |
2.5% |
0.02527076 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
68 |
12.3% |
0.12274368 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
194 |
35.0% |
0.35018051 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
102 |
18.4% |
0.18411552 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
162 |
29.2% |
0.29241877 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
2.5% |
0.02527076 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7961 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3aa_5
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social
goals: Child benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
social goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
44 |
7.9% |
0.07942238 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
185 |
33.4% |
0.33393502 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
245 |
44.2% |
0.44223827 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
49 |
8.8% |
0.08844765 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
21 |
3.8% |
0.03790614 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.8% |
0.01805054 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7961 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3b
|
Variable label:
|
National insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security,
labour migrants from the EEA get the same access: How much money should
be used on the welfare state?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian national insurance scheme aims to contribute to
financial security. Labour migrants from the European Economic Area get
the same access to the Norwegian national insurance scheme as Norwegians
do.
All in all, how much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
20 |
3.5% |
0.03533569 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
125 |
22.1% |
0.22084806 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
288 |
50.9% |
0.50883392 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
77 |
13.6% |
0.13604240 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
28 |
4.9% |
0.04946996 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
4.9% |
0.04946996 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7949 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ba_1
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Social assistance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social assistance
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
35 |
6.2% |
0.06183746 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
172 |
30.4% |
0.30388693 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
250 |
44.2% |
0.44169611 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
71 |
12.5% |
0.12544170 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
19 |
3.4% |
0.03356890 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
3.4% |
0.03356890 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7949 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ba_2
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Unemployment benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social assistance
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
19 |
3.4% |
0.03356890 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
101 |
17.8% |
0.17844523 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
316 |
55.8% |
0.55830389 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
100 |
17.7% |
0.17667845 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
10 |
1.8% |
0.01766784 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
3.5% |
0.03533569 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7949 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ba_3
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Disability benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
38 |
6.7% |
0.06713781 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
174 |
30.7% |
0.30742049 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
237 |
41.9% |
0.41872792 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
71 |
12.5% |
0.12544170 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
23 |
4.1% |
0.04063604 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
4.1% |
0.04063604 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7949 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ba_4
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Cash-for-care benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cash-for-care benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02650177 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
66 |
11.7% |
0.11660777 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
191 |
33.7% |
0.33745583 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
116 |
20.5% |
0.20494700 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
155 |
27.4% |
0.27385159 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
4.1% |
0.04063604 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7949 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ba_5
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Child benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
40 |
7.1% |
0.07067138 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
188 |
33.2% |
0.33215548 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
253 |
44.7% |
0.44699647 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
52 |
9.2% |
0.09187279 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02650177 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
3.2% |
0.03180212 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7949 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3c
|
Variable label:
|
National insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security,
asylum seekers have the same access: How much money should be used on
the welfare state?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian national insurance scheme aims to contribute to
financial security. Asylum seekers have the same access to the Norwegian
national insurance scheme as Norwegians do as soon as they are granted
asylum.
All in all, how much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
25 |
4.3% |
0.04288165 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
139 |
23.8% |
0.23842196 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
274 |
47.0% |
0.46998285 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
98 |
16.8% |
0.16809605 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
25 |
4.3% |
0.04288165 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
3.8% |
0.03773585 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7932 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ca_1
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Social assistance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social assistance
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
30 |
5.1% |
0.05145798 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
177 |
30.4% |
0.30360206 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
255 |
43.7% |
0.43739280 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
82 |
14.1% |
0.14065180 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
18 |
3.1% |
0.03087479 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
3.6% |
0.03602058 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7932 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ca_2
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Unemployment benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
19 |
3.3% |
0.03259005 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
135 |
23.2% |
0.23156089 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
286 |
49.1% |
0.49056604 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
110 |
18.9% |
0.18867925 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
11 |
1.9% |
0.01886792 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
3.8% |
0.03773585 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7932 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ca_3
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Disability benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
47 |
8.1% |
0.08061750 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
182 |
31.2% |
0.31217839 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
231 |
39.6% |
0.39622642 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
89 |
15.3% |
0.15265866 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
17 |
2.9% |
0.02915952 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.9% |
0.02915952 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7932 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ca_4
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Cash-for-care benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cash-for-care benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
18 |
3.1% |
0.03087479 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
55 |
9.4% |
0.09433962 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
225 |
38.6% |
0.38593482 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
113 |
19.4% |
0.19382504 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
153 |
26.2% |
0.26243568 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
3.3% |
0.03259005 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7932 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ca_5
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Child benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
52 |
8.9% |
0.08919383 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
174 |
29.8% |
0.29845626 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
267 |
45.8% |
0.45797599 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
50 |
8.6% |
0.08576329 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
20 |
3.4% |
0.03430532 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
3.4% |
0.03430532 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7932 |
|
NA |
w03_ran29
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1702] [Invalid:6813]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
818 |
48.1% |
0.480611 |
| 2 |
2 |
884 |
51.9% |
0.519389 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6813 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4b
|
Variable label:
|
Number of conditions that are upsetting [List 4]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Indicate how many of these four situations upset you. We are only
interested in how many upset you, not which ones.
That new Norwegian roads are often funded by collecting tolls
That
sports people earn tens of millions of kroner
That many do not
believe in climate change caused by human activities
That we have to
pay the NRK licence fee
That labour migrants from EU countries have
the same welfare benefits as Norwegians
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran29=1. The situations in R3CC4B are listed in a
randomized order. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
29 |
3.5% |
0.03545232 |
| 1 |
1 |
142 |
17.4% |
0.17359413 |
| 2 |
2 |
252 |
30.8% |
0.30806846 |
| 3 |
3 |
200 |
24.4% |
0.24449878 |
| 4 |
4 |
134 |
16.4% |
0.16381418 |
| 5 |
5 |
49 |
6.0% |
0.05990220 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01466993 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7697 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4c
|
Variable label:
|
Number of conditions that are upsetting [List 5]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Indicate how many of these four situations upset you. We are only
interested in how many upset you, not which ones.
That new Norwegian roads are often funded by collecting tolls
That
sportspeople earn tens of millions of kroner
That many do not
believe in climate change caused by human activities
That we have to
pay the NRK licence fee
That refugees who have been granted asylum
have the same welfare benefits as Norwegians
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran29=2. The situations in R3CC4C are listed in a
randomized order. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
55 |
6.2% |
0.06221719 |
| 1 |
1 |
187 |
21.2% |
0.21153846 |
| 2 |
2 |
263 |
29.8% |
0.29751131 |
| 3 |
3 |
216 |
24.4% |
0.24434389 |
| 4 |
4 |
101 |
11.4% |
0.11425339 |
| 5 |
5 |
50 |
5.7% |
0.05656109 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01357466 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7631 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc8_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees exploit our welfare system
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please tell us your viewpoint regarding the following statements
|
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees exploit our welfare system
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
195 |
11.3% |
0.11324042 |
| 2 |
Agree |
244 |
14.2% |
0.14169570 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
486 |
28.2% |
0.28222997 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
278 |
16.1% |
0.16144019 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
192 |
11.1% |
0.11149826 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
203 |
11.8% |
0.11788618 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
62 |
3.6% |
0.03600465 |
| 97 |
No answer |
62 |
3.6% |
0.03600465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc8_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Labour migrants from the European Economic Area exploit our
welfare system
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please tell us your viewpoint regarding the following statements
|
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants from the European Economic Area exploit our welfare
system
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
156 |
9.1% |
0.09059233 |
| 2 |
Agree |
255 |
14.8% |
0.14808362 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
533 |
31.0% |
0.30952381 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
313 |
18.2% |
0.18176539 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
174 |
10.1% |
0.10104530 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
178 |
10.3% |
0.10336818 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
50 |
2.9% |
0.02903600 |
| 97 |
No answer |
63 |
3.7% |
0.03658537 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc8_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees contribute to maintaining our welfare system
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please tell us your viewpoint regarding the following statements
|
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees contribute to maintaining our welfare system
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009291521 |
| 2 |
Agree |
108 |
6.3% |
0.062717770 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
265 |
15.4% |
0.153890825 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
514 |
29.8% |
0.298490128 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
318 |
18.5% |
0.184668990 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
283 |
16.4% |
0.164343786 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
141 |
8.2% |
0.081881533 |
| 97 |
No answer |
77 |
4.5% |
0.044715447 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc8_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Labour migrants from the European Economic Area contribute to
maintaining our welfare system
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please tell us your viewpoint regarding the following statements
|
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants from the European Economic Area contribute to
maintaining our welfare system
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
37 |
2.1% |
0.02148664 |
| 2 |
Agree |
238 |
13.8% |
0.13821138 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
469 |
27.2% |
0.27235772 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
457 |
26.5% |
0.26538908 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
216 |
12.5% |
0.12543554 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
158 |
9.2% |
0.09175377 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
71 |
4.1% |
0.04123113 |
| 97 |
No answer |
76 |
4.4% |
0.04413473 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc8_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is fair that refugees have full access to the Norwegian
welfare system.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please tell us your viewpoint regarding the following statements
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is fair that refugees have full access to the Norwegian welfare
system.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
90 |
5.2% |
0.05226481 |
| 2 |
Agree |
264 |
15.3% |
0.15331010 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
277 |
16.1% |
0.16085947 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
253 |
14.7% |
0.14692218 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
388 |
22.5% |
0.22531940 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
214 |
12.4% |
0.12427410 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
166 |
9.6% |
0.09639954 |
| 97 |
No answer |
70 |
4.1% |
0.04065041 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc8_6
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is fair that labour migrants from the European Economic
Area have full access to the Norwegian welfare system.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please tell us your viewpoint regarding the following statements
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is fair that labour migrants from the European Economic Area have
full access to the Norwegian welfare system.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
72 |
4.2% |
0.04181185 |
| 2 |
Agree |
242 |
14.1% |
0.14053426 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
328 |
19.0% |
0.19047619 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
288 |
16.7% |
0.16724739 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
364 |
21.1% |
0.21138211 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
209 |
12.1% |
0.12137050 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
147 |
8.5% |
0.08536585 |
| 97 |
No answer |
72 |
4.2% |
0.04181185 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_ran31
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1698] [Invalid:6817]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
415 |
24.4% |
0.2444052 |
| 2 |
2 |
431 |
25.4% |
0.2538280 |
| 3 |
3 |
433 |
25.5% |
0.2550059 |
| 4 |
4 |
419 |
24.7% |
0.2467609 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6817 |
|
NA |
w03_r3ib1a
|
Variable label:
|
Access to welfare: Immigrants who are not Norwegian citizens, but who
live in Norway, should have the same access to welfare schemes as
Norwegian citizens
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that immigrants who are not
Norwegian citizens, but who live in Norway, should have the same access
to welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran31=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
35 |
8.4% |
0.08433735 |
| 2 |
Agree |
71 |
17.1% |
0.17108434 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
88 |
21.2% |
0.21204819 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
40 |
9.6% |
0.09638554 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
73 |
17.6% |
0.17590361 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
55 |
13.3% |
0.13253012 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
43 |
10.4% |
0.10361446 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.4% |
0.02409639 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8100 |
|
NA |
w03_r3ib1b
|
Variable label:
|
Access to welfare: Immigrants who are not Norwegian citizens, but who
have lived in Norway for the last year, should have the same access to
welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that immigrants who are not
Norwegian citizens, but who have lived in Norway for the last year,
should have the same access to welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran31=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
3.2% |
0.03248260 |
| 2 |
Agree |
73 |
16.9% |
0.16937355 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
67 |
15.5% |
0.15545244 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
49 |
11.4% |
0.11368910 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
96 |
22.3% |
0.22273782 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
72 |
16.7% |
0.16705336 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
52 |
12.1% |
0.12064965 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.9% |
0.01856148 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8084 |
|
NA |
w03_r3ib1c
|
Variable label:
|
Access to welfare: Immigrants who are not Norwegian citizens, but who
have lived in Norway for the last three years, should have the same
access to welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that immigrants who are not
Norwegian citizens, but who have lived in Norway for the last three
years, should have the same access to welfare schemes as Norwegian
citizens?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran31=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
38 |
8.8% |
0.087759815 |
| 2 |
Agree |
77 |
17.8% |
0.177829099 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
90 |
20.8% |
0.207852194 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
55 |
12.7% |
0.127020785 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
65 |
15.0% |
0.150115473 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
59 |
13.6% |
0.136258661 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
45 |
10.4% |
0.103926097 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009237875 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8082 |
|
NA |
w03_r3ib1d
|
Variable label:
|
Access to welfare: Immigrants who are not Norwegian citizens, but who
have lived in Norway for the last seven years, should have the same
access to welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that immigrants who are not
Norwegian citizens, but who have lived in Norway for the last seven
years, should have the same access to welfare schemes as Norwegian
citizens?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran31=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
49 |
11.7% |
0.116945107 |
| 2 |
Agree |
124 |
29.6% |
0.295942721 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
88 |
21.0% |
0.210023866 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
42 |
10.0% |
0.100238663 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
55 |
13.1% |
0.131264916 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
36 |
8.6% |
0.085918854 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
5.0% |
0.050119332 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.0% |
0.009546539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8096 |
|
NA |
w03_ran33
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1697] [Invalid:6818]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
568 |
33.5% |
0.3347083 |
| 2 |
2 |
563 |
33.2% |
0.3317619 |
| 3 |
3 |
566 |
33.4% |
0.3335298 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6818 |
|
NA |
w03_r3lb1a
|
Variable label:
|
What you think when you read or hear the word “immigrant” [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you read or hear the word “immigrant”? Please
write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of
answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran33=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3lb1b
|
Variable label:
|
What you think when you read or hear the word “asylum seeker” [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you read or hear the word “asylum seeker”? Please
write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of
answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran33=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3lb1c
|
Variable label:
|
What you think when you read or hear the word “labour migrants” [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you read or hear the word “labour migrants”?
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran33=3]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_ran34
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1696] [Invalid:6819]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
421 |
24.8% |
0.2482311 |
| 2 |
2 |
432 |
25.5% |
0.2547170 |
| 3 |
3 |
413 |
24.4% |
0.2435142 |
| 4 |
4 |
430 |
25.4% |
0.2535377 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6819 |
|
NA |
w03_r3gi1a
|
Variable label:
|
Residence permit for rejected asylum seeker: The person has continued to
live in Norway for 3 years without being legally resident because he or
she sees the situation in their home country as difficult
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine a person who has applied for asylum and has been turned down.
The person has continued to live in Norway for 3 years without being
legally resident because he or she sees the situation in their home
country as difficult. To what extent do you agree or disagree that this
person should be granted a residence permit in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran34=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
17 |
4.0% |
0.04038005 |
| 2 |
Agree |
31 |
7.4% |
0.07363420 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
78 |
18.5% |
0.18527316 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
65 |
15.4% |
0.15439430 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
61 |
14.5% |
0.14489311 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
93 |
22.1% |
0.22090261 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
70 |
16.6% |
0.16627078 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.4% |
0.01425178 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8094 |
|
NA |
w03_r3gi1b
|
Variable label:
|
Residence permit for rejected asylum seeker: The person has continued to
live in Norway for 7 years without being legally resident because he or
she sees the situation in their home country as difficult
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine a person who has applied for asylum and has been turned down.
The person has continued to live in Norway for 7 years without being
legally resident because he or she sees the situation in their home
country as difficult. To what extent do you agree or disagree that this
person should be granted a residence permit in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran34=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
23 |
5.3% |
0.05324074 |
| 2 |
Agree |
54 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
67 |
15.5% |
0.15509259 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
56 |
13.0% |
0.12962963 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
50 |
11.6% |
0.11574074 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
96 |
22.2% |
0.22222222 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
80 |
18.5% |
0.18518519 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.4% |
0.01388889 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8083 |
|
NA |
w03_r3gi1c
|
Variable label:
|
Residence permit for rejected asylum seeker: The family has continued to
live in Norway for 3 years without being legally resident because they
see the situation in their home country as difficult
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine a child who has applied for asylum together with their family
and has been turned down. The family has continued to live in Norway for
3 years without being legally resident because they see the situation in
their home country as difficult. To what extent do you agree or disagree
that this child should be granted a residence permit in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran34=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
65 |
15.7% |
0.15738499 |
| 2 |
Agree |
82 |
19.9% |
0.19854722 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
94 |
22.8% |
0.22760291 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
42 |
10.2% |
0.10169492 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
35 |
8.5% |
0.08474576 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
67 |
16.2% |
0.16222760 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
23 |
5.6% |
0.05569007 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.2% |
0.01210654 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8102 |
|
NA |
w03_r3gi1d
|
Variable label:
|
Residence permit for rejected asylum seeker: The family has continued to
live in Norway for 7 years without being legally resident because they
see the situation in their home country as difficult
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine a child who has applied for asylum together with their family
and has been turned down. The family has continued to live in Norway for
7 years without being legally resident because they see the situation in
their home country as difficult. To what extent do you agree or disagree
that this child should be granted a residence permit in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran34=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
100 |
23.3% |
0.23255814 |
| 2 |
Agree |
105 |
24.4% |
0.24418605 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
70 |
16.3% |
0.16279070 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
39 |
9.1% |
0.09069767 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
34 |
7.9% |
0.07906977 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
43 |
10.0% |
0.10000000 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
7.2% |
0.07209302 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.9% |
0.01860465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8085 |
|
NA |
w03_ran35
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1694] [Invalid:6821]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
419 |
24.7% |
0.2473436 |
| 2 |
2 |
417 |
24.6% |
0.2461629 |
| 3 |
3 |
383 |
22.6% |
0.2260921 |
| 4 |
4 |
475 |
28.0% |
0.2804014 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6821 |
|
NA |
w03_r3bfi1a
|
Variable label:
|
Allow Islamic schools: Follows Norwegian curricula, but could impede
integration according to people in the social debate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslims in Norway want to send their children to Islamic schools
that follow Norwegian curricula but also include Islamic teachings. Some
people in social debate have argued against such schools because they
think that the schools impede integration.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway shall be
permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran35=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
6 |
1.4% |
0.014319809 |
| 2 |
Agree |
28 |
6.7% |
0.066825776 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
52 |
12.4% |
0.124105012 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
48 |
11.5% |
0.114558473 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
76 |
18.1% |
0.181384248 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
95 |
22.7% |
0.226730310 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
110 |
26.3% |
0.262529833 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.0% |
0.009546539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8096 |
|
NA |
w03_r3bfi1b
|
Variable label:
|
Allow Islamic schools: Follows Norwegian curricula, but could impede
integration according to people in the social debate. Others think that
it a ban is discriminatory
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslims in Norway want to send their children to Islamic schools
that follow Norwegian curricula but also include Islamic teachings. Some
people in social debate have argued against such schools because they
think that the schools impede integration. Others think that it is
discriminatory against Muslims to not allow Islamic schools in Norway
while Christian schools are permitted.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway shall be
permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran35=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
9 |
2.2% |
0.02158273 |
| 2 |
Agree |
31 |
7.4% |
0.07434053 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
58 |
13.9% |
0.13908873 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
50 |
12.0% |
0.11990408 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
63 |
15.1% |
0.15107914 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
91 |
21.8% |
0.21822542 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
106 |
25.4% |
0.25419664 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
2.2% |
0.02158273 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
w03_r3bfi1c
|
Variable label:
|
Allow Islamic schools: Follows Norwegian curricula, but could impede
integration according the Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslims in Norway want to send their children to Islamic schools
that follow Norwegian curricula but also include Islamic teachings. Some
Progress Party politicians have argued against such schools because they
think that the schools impede integration.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway shall be
permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran35=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
13 |
3.4% |
0.03394256 |
| 2 |
Agree |
46 |
12.0% |
0.12010444 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
52 |
13.6% |
0.13577023 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
40 |
10.4% |
0.10443864 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
61 |
15.9% |
0.15926893 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
72 |
18.8% |
0.18798956 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
92 |
24.0% |
0.24020888 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.8% |
0.01827676 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8132 |
|
NA |
w03_r3bfi1d
|
Variable label:
|
Allow Islamic schools: Follows Norwegian curricula, but could impede
integration according the Progress Party. Others think that it a ban is
discriminatory
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslims in Norway want to send their children to Islamic schools
that follow Norwegian curricula but also include Islamic teachings. Some
Progress Party politicians have argued against such schools because they
think that the schools impede integration. Others think that it is
discriminatory against Muslims to not allow Islamic schools in Norway
while Christian schools are permitted.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway shall be
permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran35=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
15 |
3.2% |
0.03157895 |
| 2 |
Agree |
34 |
7.2% |
0.07157895 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
67 |
14.1% |
0.14105263 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
57 |
12.0% |
0.12000000 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
76 |
16.0% |
0.16000000 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
92 |
19.4% |
0.19368421 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
126 |
26.5% |
0.26526316 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.7% |
0.01684211 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8040 |
|
NA |
w03_ran36
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4, except respondents recruited in wave 1 that earlier
have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1413] [Invalid:7102]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
114 |
8.1% |
0.08067941 |
| 2 |
2 |
119 |
8.4% |
0.08421798 |
| 3 |
3 |
123 |
8.7% |
0.08704883 |
| 4 |
4 |
117 |
8.3% |
0.08280255 |
| 5 |
5 |
122 |
8.6% |
0.08634112 |
| 6 |
6 |
105 |
7.4% |
0.07430998 |
| 7 |
7 |
130 |
9.2% |
0.09200283 |
| 8 |
8 |
121 |
8.6% |
0.08563340 |
| 9 |
9 |
121 |
8.6% |
0.08563340 |
| 10 |
10 |
114 |
8.1% |
0.08067941 |
| 11 |
11 |
117 |
8.3% |
0.08280255 |
| 12 |
12 |
110 |
7.8% |
0.07784855 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7102 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1a2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You do not have the opportunity to influence this
decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the
money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
7 |
6.1% |
0.06140351 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
95 |
83.3% |
0.83333333 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
11 |
9.6% |
0.09649123 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.00877193 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8401 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1b2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You do have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to
be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=2. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
3 |
2.5% |
0.02521008 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
111 |
93.3% |
0.93277311 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
3 |
2.5% |
0.02521008 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.7% |
0.01680672 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8396 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1c2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome, is among 1000 participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of a thousand selected respondents who get to vote on
how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=3. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
4 |
3.3% |
0.032520325 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
111 |
90.2% |
0.902439024 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
5.7% |
0.056910569 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008130081 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8392 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1d2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome, is among 100 participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of a hundred selected respondents who get to vote on how
the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=4. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
11 |
9.4% |
0.09401709 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
102 |
87.2% |
0.87179487 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
4 |
3.4% |
0.03418803 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1e2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome, is among 10 participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of ten selected respondents who get to vote on how the
money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=5. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
5 |
4.1% |
0.040983607 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
109 |
89.3% |
0.893442623 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
5.7% |
0.057377049 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008196721 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8393 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1f2a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome, is among 3 participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the
Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either
be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the
Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of three selected respondents who get to vote on how the
money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=6. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
8 |
7.6% |
0.07619048 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
81 |
77.1% |
0.77142857 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
14 |
13.3% |
0.13333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.9% |
0.01904762 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8410 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1a2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You do not have the opportunity to influence this
decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the
money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=7. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
12 |
9.2% |
0.09230769 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
106 |
81.5% |
0.81538462 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
8 |
6.2% |
0.06153846 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.1% |
0.03076923 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8385 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1b2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You do have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to
be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=8. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
12 |
9.9% |
0.09917355 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
93 |
76.9% |
0.76859504 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
12 |
9.9% |
0.09917355 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.3% |
0.03305785 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8394 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1c2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 1000
participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of a thousand selected respondents who get to vote on
how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=9. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
10 |
8.3% |
0.08264463 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
104 |
86.0% |
0.85950413 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
5.8% |
0.05785124 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8394 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1d2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 100
participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of a hundred selected respondents who get to vote on how
the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=10. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
11 |
9.6% |
0.09649123 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
97 |
85.1% |
0.85087719 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
3 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8401 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1e2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 10
participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of ten selected respondents who get to vote on how the
money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=11. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
12 |
10.3% |
0.102564103 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
95 |
81.2% |
0.811965812 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
9 |
7.7% |
0.076923077 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.008547009 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1f2b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors
without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 3
participants
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money
will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in
the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors
without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision,
and you are one of three selected respondents who get to vote on how the
money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=12. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
5 |
4.5% |
0.045454545 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
96 |
87.3% |
0.872727273 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
8 |
7.3% |
0.072727273 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.009090909 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8405 |
|
NA |
w03_ran37
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4, except respondents recruited in wave 1 that earlier
have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1411] [Invalid:7104]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
343 |
24.3% |
0.2430900 |
| 2 |
2 |
349 |
24.7% |
0.2473423 |
| 3 |
3 |
366 |
25.9% |
0.2593905 |
| 4 |
4 |
353 |
25.0% |
0.2501772 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7104 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad313_1a2a
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable decision: Draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to
participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a draw for a travel gift card
worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel. To what
extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran37=1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
22 |
6.4% |
0.06413994 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
63 |
18.4% |
0.18367347 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
110 |
32.1% |
0.32069971 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
84 |
24.5% |
0.24489796 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
56 |
16.3% |
0.16326531 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.3% |
0.02332362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8172 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad313_1b2a
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable decision: A donation of NOK 5,000 given to Doctors without
borders
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a donation of NOK 5,000 to
Doctors without borders. To what extent do you think this decision is
acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran37=2. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
232 |
66.5% |
0.664756447 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
78 |
22.3% |
0.223495702 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
23 |
6.6% |
0.065902579 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
7 |
2.0% |
0.020057307 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005730659 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.0% |
0.020057307 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8166 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad313_1a2b
|
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept decision: Draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000
to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a draw for a travel gift card
worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel. How
willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran37=3. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
38 |
10.4% |
0.103825137 |
| 2 |
Willing |
121 |
33.1% |
0.330601093 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
61 |
16.7% |
0.166666667 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
86 |
23.5% |
0.234972678 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
57 |
15.6% |
0.155737705 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.8% |
0.008196721 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8149 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad313_1b2b
|
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept decision: A donation of NOK 5,000 given to Doctors
without borders
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a donation of NOK 5,000 to
Doctors without borders. How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran37=4. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very willing |
280 |
79.3% |
0.793201133 |
| 2 |
Willing |
49 |
13.9% |
0.138810198 |
| 3 |
Somewhat willing |
12 |
3.4% |
0.033994334 |
| 4 |
Slightly willing |
4 |
1.1% |
0.011331445 |
| 5 |
Not willing at all |
1 |
0.3% |
0.002832861 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.0% |
0.019830028 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8162 |
|
NA |
w03_ran38
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1690] [Invalid:6825]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
412 |
24.4% |
0.2437870 |
| 2 |
2 |
377 |
22.3% |
0.2230769 |
| 3 |
3 |
465 |
27.5% |
0.2751479 |
| 4 |
4 |
436 |
25.8% |
0.2579882 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6825 |
|
NA |
w03_wt1a
|
Variable label:
|
New power transmission line through your municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To safeguard the electricity supply and the use of clean,
eco-friendly electricity throughout Norway, now and again the
authorities must facilitate new power transmission lines. But these
power transmission lines sometimes create conflict because the landscape
will be changed. In addition, some people living near the new power
transmission lines may be concerned about problems with health and
safety associated with the lines.
Let’s say that the government had proposed building a new power
transmission line that would be clearly visible in your municipality.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you support a government decision to build a power transmission
line through your municipality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran38=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
296 |
71.8% |
0.71844660 |
| 2 |
No |
104 |
25.2% |
0.25242718 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.9% |
0.02912621 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8103 |
|
NA |
w03_wt1b
|
Variable label:
|
New power transmission line through your municipality, visible in up to
several other nearby municipalities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To safeguard the electricity supply and the use of clean,
eco-friendly electricity throughout Norway, now and again the
authorities must facilitate new power transmission lines. But these
power transmission lines sometimes create conflict because the landscape
will be changed. In addition, some people living near the new power
transmission lines may be concerned about problems with health and
safety associated with the lines.
Let’s say that the government had proposed building a new power
transmission line that would be clearly visible in your municipality.
Moreover, it would be visible in up to several other nearby
municipalities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you support a government decision to build a power transmission
line through your municipality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran38=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
232 |
61.5% |
0.61538462 |
| 2 |
No |
128 |
34.0% |
0.33952255 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
4.5% |
0.04509284 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8138 |
|
NA |
w03_wt1c
|
Variable label:
|
New power transmission line through your municipality, the government
would offer money to your municipality to compensate for the negative
effects
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To safeguard the electricity supply and the use of clean,
eco-friendly electricity throughout Norway, now and again the
authorities must facilitate new power transmission lines. But these
power transmission lines sometimes create conflict because the landscape
will be changed. In addition, some people living near the new power
transmission lines may be concerned about problems with health and
safety associated with the lines.
Let’s say that the government had proposed building a new power
transmission line that would be clearly visible in your municipality. In
return the government would offer money to your municipality to
compensate for the negative effects of the new power transmission line.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you support a government decision to build a power transmission
line through your municipality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran38=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
317 |
68.2% |
0.68172043 |
| 2 |
No |
136 |
29.2% |
0.29247312 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.6% |
0.02580645 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8050 |
|
NA |
w03_wt1d
|
Variable label:
|
New power transmission line through your municipality, visible in up to
several other nearby municipalities, the government would offer money to
your municipality to compensate for the negative effects
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To safeguard the electricity supply and the use of clean,
eco-friendly electricity throughout Norway, now and again the
authorities must facilitate new power transmission lines. But these
power transmission lines sometimes create conflict because the landscape
will be changed. In addition, some people living near the new power
transmission lines may be concerned about problems with health and
safety associated with the lines.
Let’s say that the government had proposed building a new power
transmission line that would be clearly visible in your municipality.
Moreover, it would be visible in up to several other nearby
municipalities. In return the government would offer money to your
municipality to compensate for the negative effects of the new power
transmission line.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you support a government decision to build a power transmission
line through your municipality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran38=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
290 |
66.5% |
0.66513761 |
| 2 |
No |
135 |
31.0% |
0.30963303 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.5% |
0.02522936 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
w03_wt2
|
Variable label:
|
How worried are you about the reliability of your electricity supply?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How worried are you about the reliability of your electricity supply?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very worried |
30 |
1.7% |
0.01742160 |
| 2 |
Worried |
150 |
8.7% |
0.08710801 |
| 3 |
Somewhat worried |
376 |
21.8% |
0.21835075 |
| 4 |
Slightly worried |
779 |
45.2% |
0.45238095 |
| 5 |
Not worried |
316 |
18.4% |
0.18350755 |
| 97 |
No answer |
71 |
4.1% |
0.04123113 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_wt3
|
Variable label:
|
Do you feel a duty as a citizen to help to ensure the reliable supply of
electricity in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel a duty as a citizen to help to ensure the reliable supply of
electricity in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
990 |
57.5% |
0.57491289 |
| 2 |
No |
627 |
36.4% |
0.36411150 |
| 97 |
No answer |
105 |
6.1% |
0.06097561 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_wt4
|
Variable label:
|
Would you think it is fair if your municipality was selected as a
location for a new power transmission line?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you think it is fair if your municipality was selected as a
location for a new power transmission line?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1187 |
68.9% |
0.68931475 |
| 2 |
No |
408 |
23.7% |
0.23693380 |
| 97 |
No answer |
127 |
7.4% |
0.07375145 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_ran39
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1680] [Invalid:6835]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
869 |
51.7% |
0.5172619 |
| 2 |
2 |
811 |
48.3% |
0.4827381 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6835 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km34
|
Variable label:
|
Reduce, maintain or increase its oil production from the perspective of
the climate: Emissions of CO2 from burning oil are a major contributor
to climate change caused by human activities, but the world needs energy
and Norwegian oil production is cleaner than in many other countries
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following arguments are often made: Emissions of CO2 from burning
oil are a major contributor to climate change caused by human
activities, but the world needs energy and Norwegian oil production is
cleaner than in many other countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, should Norway reduce, maintain or increase its oil
production from the perspective of the climate?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran39=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Reduce |
310 |
35.7% |
0.35673188 |
| 2 |
Maintain |
481 |
55.4% |
0.55350978 |
| 3 |
Increase |
60 |
6.9% |
0.06904488 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02071346 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7646 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km35
|
Variable label:
|
Reduce, maintain or increase its oil production from the perspective of
the climate: The world needs energy and Norwegian oil production is
cleaner than in many other countries, but CO2 emissions from burning oil
are a major contributor to climate change caused by human activities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following arguments are often made: The world needs energy and
Norwegian oil production is cleaner than in many other countries, but
CO2 emissions from burning oil are a major contributor to climate change
caused by human activities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, should Norway reduce, maintain or increase its oil
production from the perspective of the climate?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran39=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Reduce |
289 |
35.6% |
0.35635018 |
| 2 |
Maintain |
440 |
54.3% |
0.54254007 |
| 3 |
Increase |
66 |
8.1% |
0.08138101 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.0% |
0.01972873 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7704 |
|
NA |
w03_ran47
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1678] [Invalid:6837]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
420 |
25.0% |
0.2502980 |
| 2 |
2 |
442 |
26.3% |
0.2634088 |
| 3 |
3 |
421 |
25.1% |
0.2508939 |
| 4 |
4 |
395 |
23.5% |
0.2353993 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6837 |
|
NA |
w03_no3a
|
Variable label:
|
The amount of corruption in government, no opinion
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government are
corrupt, not very many are, hardly any of them are corrupt, or do you
not have an opinion on that?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran47=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Quite a few |
29 |
6.9% |
0.06904762 |
| 2 |
Not many |
168 |
40.0% |
0.40000000 |
| 3 |
Hardly any |
142 |
33.8% |
0.33809524 |
| 4 |
No opinion |
75 |
17.9% |
0.17857143 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.4% |
0.01428571 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8095 |
|
NA |
w03_no3b
|
Variable label:
|
The amount of corruption in government, not have enough information
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government are
corrupt, not very many are, hardly any of them are corrupt, or do you
not have enough information about the government to say?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran47=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Quite a few |
25 |
5.7% |
0.05656109 |
| 2 |
Not many |
152 |
34.4% |
0.34389140 |
| 3 |
Hardly any |
113 |
25.6% |
0.25565611 |
| 4 |
No opinion |
141 |
31.9% |
0.31900452 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.5% |
0.02488688 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8073 |
|
NA |
w03_no3c
|
Variable label:
|
The amount of corruption in government, don’t know
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government are
corrupt, not very many are, or hardly any of them are corrupt, or don’t
you know?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran47=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Quite a few |
30 |
7.1% |
0.07125891 |
| 2 |
Not many |
166 |
39.4% |
0.39429929 |
| 3 |
Hardly any |
138 |
32.8% |
0.32779097 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.7% |
0.01662708 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8094 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
I don’t know |
80 |
19.0% |
0.19002375 |
w03_no3d
|
Variable label:
|
The amount of corruption in government
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government are
corrupt, not very many are, or hardly any of them are corrupt?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran47=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Quite a few |
36 |
9.1% |
0.09113924 |
| 2 |
Not many |
201 |
50.9% |
0.50886076 |
| 3 |
Hardly any |
148 |
37.5% |
0.37468354 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.5% |
0.02531646 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8120 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1
|
Variable label:
|
Norway’s role in international politics: Active or reduced role
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it is best for Norway in the future to play an active role
in international politics, or should Norway preferably have a reduced
role?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Active role in international politics |
1277 |
74.9% |
0.74853458 |
| 2 |
Reduced role in international politics |
371 |
21.7% |
0.21746776 |
| 97 |
No answer |
58 |
3.4% |
0.03399766 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_mobil_klima
|
Variable label:
|
Tests if the respondent answers on a mobile phone
|
|
Technical description:
|
[mobil_klima = 1 if respondent is using mobile device]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1690] [Invalid:6825]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Does not answer on a phone |
1530 |
90.5% |
0.90532544 |
| 1 |
Answers on a phone |
160 |
9.5% |
0.09467456 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
6825 |
|
NA |
w03_ran40
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1530] [Invalid:6985]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
181 |
11.8% |
0.1183007 |
| 2 |
2 |
214 |
14.0% |
0.1398693 |
| 3 |
3 |
189 |
12.4% |
0.1235294 |
| 4 |
4 |
199 |
13.0% |
0.1300654 |
| 5 |
5 |
190 |
12.4% |
0.1241830 |
| 6 |
6 |
183 |
12.0% |
0.1196078 |
| 7 |
7 |
189 |
12.4% |
0.1235294 |
| 8 |
8 |
185 |
12.1% |
0.1209150 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_1
|
Variable label:
|
1 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in
conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years.
However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has
risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry
and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the
increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 30 and
100 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is entirely possible
that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that the
development can be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of
greenhouse gases.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=1. Respondents using mobile device are not
exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 1 |
Exposed |
181 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8334 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_2
|
Variable label:
|
2 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in
conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years.
However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has
risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry
and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the
increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 30 and
100 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is not entirely
certain that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that
the development can be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of
greenhouse gases.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=2. Respondents using mobile device are not
exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 1 |
Exposed |
214 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8301 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_3
|
Variable label:
|
3 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in
conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years.
However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has
risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry
and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the
increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 50 and
60 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is entirely possible
that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that the
development can be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of
greenhouse gases.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=3. Respondents using mobile device are not
exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 1 |
Exposed |
189 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8326 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_4
|
Variable label:
|
4 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in
conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years.
However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has
risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry
and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the
increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 50 and
60 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is not entirely
certain that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that
the development can be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of
greenhouse gases.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=4. Respondents using mobile device are not
exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 1 |
Exposed |
199 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8316 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_5
|
Variable label:
|
5 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in
conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years.
However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has
risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry
and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the
increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 30 and
100 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is entirely possible
that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that the
development must be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of
greenhouse gases.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=5. Respondents using mobile device are not
exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 1 |
Exposed |
190 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8325 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_6
|
Variable label:
|
6 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in
conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years.
However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has
risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry
and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the
increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 30 and
100 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is not entirely
certain that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that
the development must be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of
greenhouse gases.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=6. Respondents using mobile device are not
exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 1 |
Exposed |
183 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8332 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_7
|
Variable label:
|
7 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in
conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years.
However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has
risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry
and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the
increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 50 and
60 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is entirely possible
that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that the
development must be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of
greenhouse gases.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=7. Respondents using mobile device are not
exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 1 |
Exposed |
189 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8326 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_8
|
Variable label:
|
8 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in
conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years.
However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has
risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry
and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the
increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 50 and
60 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is not entirely
certain that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that
the development must be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of
greenhouse gases.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=8. Respondents using mobile device are not
exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 1 |
Exposed |
185 |
100.0% |
1 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8330 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km11_1
|
Variable label:
|
What probability do you think the expert has in mind when he says “it is
entirely possible” that the sea level will rise as estimated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What probability do you think the expert has in mind when he says “it is
entirely possible” that the sea level will rise as estimated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Indicate a figure between 0% and 100%
[Asked if U=5 and ran40=1 or ran40=3 or ran40=5 or ran40=7. Still
exposed to vignette. Respondents using mobil device are not exposed to
the experiment]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-21]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0% |
7 |
0.9% |
0.009345794 |
| 3 |
10 |
53 |
7.1% |
0.070761015 |
| 5 |
20 |
77 |
10.3% |
0.102803738 |
| 7 |
30 |
92 |
12.3% |
0.122830441 |
| 9 |
40 |
72 |
9.6% |
0.096128171 |
| 11 |
50 |
120 |
16.0% |
0.160213618 |
| 13 |
60 |
72 |
9.6% |
0.096128171 |
| 15 |
70 |
77 |
10.3% |
0.102803738 |
| 17 |
80 |
79 |
10.5% |
0.105473965 |
| 19 |
90 |
48 |
6.4% |
0.064085447 |
| 21 |
100 % |
15 |
2.0% |
0.020026702 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
4.9% |
0.049399199 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7766 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km12_1
|
Variable label:
|
What probability do you think the expert has in mind when he says “it is
not entirely certain” that the sea level will rise as estimated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What probability do you think the expert has in mind when he says “it is
not entirely certain” that the sea level will rise as estimated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Indicate a figure between 0% and 100%
[Asked if U=5 and ran40=2 or ran40=4 or ran40=6 or ran40=8. Still
exposed to vignette. Respondents using mobil device are not exposed to
the experiment]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-21]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0% |
6 |
0.8% |
0.007682458 |
| 3 |
10 |
36 |
4.6% |
0.046094750 |
| 5 |
20 |
62 |
7.9% |
0.079385403 |
| 7 |
30 |
111 |
14.2% |
0.142125480 |
| 9 |
40 |
90 |
11.5% |
0.115236876 |
| 11 |
50 |
169 |
21.6% |
0.216389245 |
| 13 |
60 |
68 |
8.7% |
0.087067862 |
| 15 |
70 |
86 |
11.0% |
0.110115237 |
| 17 |
80 |
64 |
8.2% |
0.081946223 |
| 19 |
90 |
51 |
6.5% |
0.065300896 |
| 21 |
100 % |
9 |
1.2% |
0.011523688 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
3.7% |
0.037131882 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7734 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km13_1
|
Variable label:
|
How probable do YOU think it is that the sea level will rise as
estimated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How probable do YOU think it is that the sea level will rise as
estimated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Indicate a figure between 0% and 100%
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents
using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions
R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-21]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0% |
24 |
1.6% |
0.01568627 |
| 3 |
10 |
137 |
9.0% |
0.08954248 |
| 5 |
20 |
161 |
10.5% |
0.10522876 |
| 7 |
30 |
184 |
12.0% |
0.12026144 |
| 9 |
40 |
135 |
8.8% |
0.08823529 |
| 11 |
50 |
252 |
16.5% |
0.16470588 |
| 13 |
60 |
126 |
8.2% |
0.08235294 |
| 15 |
70 |
146 |
9.5% |
0.09542484 |
| 17 |
80 |
152 |
9.9% |
0.09934641 |
| 19 |
90 |
105 |
6.9% |
0.06862745 |
| 21 |
100 % |
29 |
1.9% |
0.01895425 |
| 97 |
No answer |
79 |
5.2% |
0.05163399 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km14
|
Variable label:
|
If the expert’s forecasts for the rise in sea level turn out to be
wrong, do you think that the rise will be higher or lower than he has
estimated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the expert’s forecasts for the rise in sea level turn out to be
wrong, do you think that the rise will be higher or lower than he has
estimated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents
using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions
R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Higher |
360 |
23.5% |
0.23529412 |
| 2 |
Lower |
1115 |
72.9% |
0.72875817 |
| 97 |
No answer |
55 |
3.6% |
0.03594771 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km15
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you trust the expert?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you trust the expert?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents
using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions
R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
56 |
3.7% |
0.03660131 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
428 |
28.0% |
0.27973856 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
800 |
52.3% |
0.52287582 |
| 4 |
To a slight extent |
191 |
12.5% |
0.12483660 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
30 |
2.0% |
0.01960784 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
1.6% |
0.01633987 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km16
|
Variable label:
|
How correct do you think the expert’s forecasts for the rise in sea
level are?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How correct do you think the expert’s forecasts for the rise in sea
level are?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents
using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions
R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very correct |
41 |
2.7% |
0.02679739 |
| 2 |
Correct |
206 |
13.5% |
0.13464052 |
| 3 |
Quite correct |
808 |
52.8% |
0.52810458 |
| 4 |
Not very correct |
396 |
25.9% |
0.25882353 |
| 5 |
Not correct at all |
27 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
| 97 |
No answer |
52 |
3.4% |
0.03398693 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km17
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that human activity is causing the rise in sea level?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that human activity is causing the rise in sea level?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents
using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions
R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
341 |
22.3% |
0.22287582 |
| 2 |
Likely |
526 |
34.4% |
0.34379085 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
495 |
32.4% |
0.32352941 |
| 4 |
Slightly likely |
118 |
7.7% |
0.07712418 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
16 |
1.0% |
0.01045752 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km18
|
Variable label:
|
Urgency for reducing greenhouse gas emissions
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the level of urgency for reducing greenhouse gas emissions?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents
using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions
R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very urgent |
419 |
27.4% |
0.27385621 |
| 2 |
Urgent |
560 |
36.6% |
0.36601307 |
| 3 |
Somewhat urgent |
316 |
20.7% |
0.20653595 |
| 4 |
Slightly urgent |
151 |
9.9% |
0.09869281 |
| 5 |
Not urgent |
50 |
3.3% |
0.03267974 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km19
|
Variable label:
|
Willingness to change current lifestyle to reduce emissions of
greenhouse gases
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how willing are you to change your current lifestyle to
reduce emissions of greenhouse gases?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents
using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions
R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
134 |
8.8% |
0.08758170 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
492 |
32.2% |
0.32156863 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
694 |
45.4% |
0.45359477 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
144 |
9.4% |
0.09411765 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
42 |
2.7% |
0.02745098 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
1.6% |
0.01568627 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3km20
|
Variable label:
|
Statement that best describes viewpoint on climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following statements best describes
your viewpoint on climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Select one of the alternatives.
[Asked if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think that the climate is not changing. |
15 |
0.9% |
0.008792497 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
129 |
7.6% |
0.075615475 |
| 3 |
I think that the climate is changing, but it is only to a small extent linked to
human influences. |
489 |
28.7% |
0.286635404 |
| 4 |
I think that the climate is changing, and that it is largely a result of human
influences. |
1023 |
60.0% |
0.599648300 |
| 97 |
No answer |
50 |
2.9% |
0.029308324 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_ran41
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1689] [Invalid:6826]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
842 |
49.9% |
0.4985198 |
| 2 |
2 |
847 |
50.1% |
0.5014802 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6826 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km23
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change are you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned about climate change are you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran41=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very concerned |
93 |
11.0% |
0.110451306 |
| 2 |
Concerned |
260 |
30.9% |
0.308788599 |
| 3 |
Somewhat concerned |
297 |
35.3% |
0.352731591 |
| 4 |
Slightly concerned |
146 |
17.3% |
0.173396675 |
| 5 |
Not concerned at all |
38 |
4.5% |
0.045130641 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.0% |
0.009501188 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km24
|
Variable label:
|
How concerned about global warming are you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned about global warming are you?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran41=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very concerned |
84 |
9.9% |
0.09917355 |
| 2 |
Concerned |
277 |
32.7% |
0.32703660 |
| 3 |
Somewhat concerned |
307 |
36.2% |
0.36245573 |
| 4 |
Slightly concerned |
148 |
17.5% |
0.17473436 |
| 5 |
Not concerned at all |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02243211 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01416765 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7668 |
|
NA |
w03_ran42
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1401] [Invalid:7114]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
708 |
50.5% |
0.5053533 |
| 2 |
2 |
693 |
49.5% |
0.4946467 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7114 |
|
NA |
w03_pad314a
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
One of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has
NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift
card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will
be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You as a participant
do not have the opportunity to influence this decision, but it is still
interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you
prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran42=1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
49 |
6.9% |
0.069209040 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
605 |
85.5% |
0.854519774 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
49 |
6.9% |
0.069209040 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.7% |
0.007062147 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7807 |
|
NA |
w03_pad314b
|
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or
random participant, can affect outcome
|
|
Literal question:
|
One of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has
NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift
card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will
be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You as a participant
have the opportunity to influence this decision, and it is therefore
interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you
prefer?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran42=2. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have
been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
71 |
10.2% |
0.10245310 |
| 2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
576 |
83.1% |
0.83116883 |
| 3 |
Have no opinion |
37 |
5.3% |
0.05339105 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.3% |
0.01298701 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7822 |
|
NA |
w03_ran48
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1689] [Invalid:6826]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
827 |
49.0% |
0.4896388 |
| 2 |
2 |
862 |
51.0% |
0.5103612 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6826 |
|
NA |
w03_ran32
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:827] [Invalid:7688]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
273 |
33.0% |
0.3301088 |
| 2 |
2 |
273 |
33.0% |
0.3301088 |
| 3 |
3 |
281 |
34.0% |
0.3397823 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7688 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3a
|
Variable label:
|
National insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security: How
much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian national insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial
security. All in all, how much money should be used on the welfare
state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
25 |
9.2% |
0.091575092 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
120 |
44.0% |
0.439560440 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
95 |
34.8% |
0.347985348 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
25 |
9.2% |
0.091575092 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
2 |
0.7% |
0.007326007 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.2% |
0.021978022 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3aa_1
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social
goals: Social assistance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
social goals
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social assistance
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
20 |
7.3% |
0.07326007 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
87 |
31.9% |
0.31868132 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
108 |
39.6% |
0.39560440 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
36 |
13.2% |
0.13186813 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
14 |
5.1% |
0.05128205 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02930403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3aa_2
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social
goals: Unemployment benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
social goals
|
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
11 |
4.0% |
0.04029304 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
54 |
19.8% |
0.19780220 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
145 |
53.1% |
0.53113553 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
41 |
15.0% |
0.15018315 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
14 |
5.1% |
0.05128205 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02930403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3aa_3
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social
goals: Disability benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
social goals
|
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
32 |
11.7% |
0.11721612 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
88 |
32.2% |
0.32234432 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
104 |
38.1% |
0.38095238 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
28 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
10 |
3.7% |
0.03663004 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
4.0% |
0.04029304 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3aa_4
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social
goals: Cash-for-care benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
social goals
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cash-for-care benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
14 |
5.1% |
0.05128205 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
20 |
7.3% |
0.07326007 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
84 |
30.8% |
0.30769231 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
67 |
24.5% |
0.24542125 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
80 |
29.3% |
0.29304029 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02930403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3aa_5
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social
goals: Child benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
social goals
|
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
31 |
11.4% |
0.11355311 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
73 |
26.7% |
0.26739927 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
129 |
47.3% |
0.47252747 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
22 |
8.1% |
0.08058608 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
10 |
3.7% |
0.03663004 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02930403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3b
|
Variable label:
|
National insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security,
labour migrants from the EEA get the same access: How much money should
be used on the welfare state?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian national insurance scheme aims to contribute to
financial security. Labour migrants from the European Economic Area get
the same access to the Norwegian national insurance scheme as Norwegians
do.
All in all, how much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
20 |
7.3% |
0.07326007 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
74 |
27.1% |
0.27106227 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
123 |
45.1% |
0.45054945 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
40 |
14.7% |
0.14652015 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03296703 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3ccba_1
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Social assistance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
27 |
9.9% |
0.09890110 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
86 |
31.5% |
0.31501832 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
107 |
39.2% |
0.39194139 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
40 |
14.7% |
0.14652015 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
5 |
1.8% |
0.01831502 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02930403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3ccba_2
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Unemployment benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
14 |
5.1% |
0.05128205 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
48 |
17.6% |
0.17582418 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
149 |
54.6% |
0.54578755 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
49 |
17.9% |
0.17948718 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02197802 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3ccba_3
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Disability benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
21 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
75 |
27.5% |
0.27472527 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
124 |
45.4% |
0.45421245 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
37 |
13.6% |
0.13553114 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
7 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03296703 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3ccba_4
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Cash-for-care benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cash-for-care benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02197802 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
28 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
92 |
33.7% |
0.33699634 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
55 |
20.1% |
0.20146520 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
81 |
29.7% |
0.29670330 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
4.0% |
0.04029304 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3ccba_5
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Child benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
19 |
7.0% |
0.06959707 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
91 |
33.3% |
0.33333333 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
118 |
43.2% |
0.43223443 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
29 |
10.6% |
0.10622711 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
7 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03296703 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3c
|
Variable label:
|
National insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security,
asylum seekers have the same access: How much money should be used on
the welfare state?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian national insurance scheme aims to contribute to
financial security. Asylum seekers have the same access to the Norwegian
national insurance scheme as Norwegians do as soon as they are granted
asylum.
All in all, how much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
15 |
5.3% |
0.05338078 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
69 |
24.6% |
0.24555160 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
146 |
52.0% |
0.51957295 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
35 |
12.5% |
0.12455516 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
11 |
3.9% |
0.03914591 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.8% |
0.01779359 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3ca_1
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Social assistance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
22 |
7.8% |
0.07829181 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
79 |
28.1% |
0.28113879 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
137 |
48.8% |
0.48754448 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
30 |
10.7% |
0.10676157 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
9 |
3.2% |
0.03202847 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01423488 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3ca_2
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Unemployment benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
11 |
3.9% |
0.03914591 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
60 |
21.4% |
0.21352313 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
152 |
54.1% |
0.54092527 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
48 |
17.1% |
0.17081851 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01423488 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02135231 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3ca_3
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Disability benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
20 |
7.1% |
0.07117438 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
92 |
32.7% |
0.32740214 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
116 |
41.3% |
0.41281139 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
42 |
14.9% |
0.14946619 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01423488 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.5% |
0.02491103 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3ca_4
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Cash-for-care benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Cash-for-care benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
10 |
3.6% |
0.03558719 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
30 |
10.7% |
0.10676157 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
94 |
33.5% |
0.33451957 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
61 |
21.7% |
0.21708185 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
80 |
28.5% |
0.28469751 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02135231 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3ca_5
|
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals:
Child benefit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think
that the government should use more or less money on the following
goals:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much more money |
26 |
9.3% |
0.09252669 |
| 2 |
A bit more money |
74 |
26.3% |
0.26334520 |
| 3 |
Neither more nor less |
143 |
50.9% |
0.50889680 |
| 4 |
A bit less money |
23 |
8.2% |
0.08185053 |
| 5 |
Much less money |
11 |
3.9% |
0.03914591 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01423488 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4a
|
Variable label:
|
Number of conditions that are upsetting [List 6]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Indicate how many of these four situations upset you. We are only
interested in how many upset you, not which ones.
That new Norwegian roads are often funded by collecting tolls
That
sportspeople earn tens of millions of kroner
That many do not
believe in climate change caused by human activities
That we have to
pay the NRK licence fee
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
118 |
6.9% |
0.06916764 |
| 1 |
1 |
428 |
25.1% |
0.25087925 |
| 2 |
2 |
660 |
38.7% |
0.38686987 |
| 3 |
3 |
317 |
18.6% |
0.18581477 |
| 4 |
4 |
135 |
7.9% |
0.07913247 |
| 97 |
No answer |
48 |
2.8% |
0.02813599 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4da
|
Variable label:
|
Does it upset you that refugees who have been granted asylum have access
to the same welfare benefits as Norwegians do?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Does it upset you that refugees who have been granted asylum have access
to the same welfare benefits as Norwegians do?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
516 |
30.2% |
0.30246190 |
| 2 |
No |
1139 |
66.8% |
0.66764361 |
| 97 |
No answer |
51 |
3.0% |
0.02989449 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4db
|
Variable label:
|
Does it upset you that begging is legal in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Does it upset you that begging is legal in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
840 |
49.2% |
0.49237984 |
| 2 |
No |
814 |
47.7% |
0.47713951 |
| 97 |
No answer |
52 |
3.0% |
0.03048066 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4dc
|
Variable label:
|
Does it upset you that the government has now reduced the paternal quota
(“paternity leave”)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Does it upset you that the government has now reduced the paternal quota
(“paternity leave”)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
730 |
42.8% |
0.42790152 |
| 2 |
No |
923 |
54.1% |
0.54103165 |
| 97 |
No answer |
53 |
3.1% |
0.03106682 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_ran46
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1683] [Invalid:6832]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
825 |
49.0% |
0.4901961 |
| 2 |
2 |
858 |
51.0% |
0.5098039 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6832 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1a
|
Variable label:
|
Increase, maintain or reduce the amount spent on financial assistance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we would like to ask you about Norway’s financial assistance
programs.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some people think that the amount the Norwegian government spends on
financial assistance should be increased, while others believe it should
be maintained at the present level, or decreased. What is your opinion,
do you think the Norwegian government should increase, maintain, or
decrease the amount it spends on financial assistance?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Increased |
121 |
14.7% |
0.14666667 |
| 2 |
Maintained |
525 |
63.6% |
0.63636364 |
| 3 |
Decreased |
123 |
14.9% |
0.14909091 |
| 97 |
No answer |
56 |
6.8% |
0.06787879 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7690 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1aa
|
Variable label:
|
Increase the amount spent on financial assistance, quite a bit or just a
little
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the Norwegian government should increase spending on
financial assistance quite a bit or just a little?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1, and PRA1A=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Quite a bit |
77 |
63.6% |
0.636363636 |
| 2 |
Just a little |
43 |
35.5% |
0.355371901 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008264463 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8394 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1ab
|
Variable label:
|
Reduce the amount spent on financial assistance, quite a bit or just a
little
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the Norwegian government should decrease spending on
financial assistance quite a bit or just a little?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1, and PRA1A=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Quite a bit |
82 |
66.7% |
0.666666667 |
| 2 |
Just a little |
40 |
32.5% |
0.325203252 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008130081 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8392 |
|
NA |
w03_pra2aba
|
Variable label:
|
Norwegian authorities have a moral obligation to give aid to the poor in
other countries
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian government has a moral
obligation to provide financial assistance to the poor in other
countries?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1. PRA2Aba and PRA2Ba is asked on the same page,
and the order is randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree strongly |
354 |
42.9% |
0.42909091 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
345 |
41.8% |
0.41818182 |
| 3 |
Disagree somewhat |
72 |
8.7% |
0.08727273 |
| 4 |
Disagree strongly |
40 |
4.8% |
0.04848485 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.7% |
0.01696970 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7690 |
|
NA |
w03_pra2ba
|
Variable label:
|
Whom should receive economic assistance
|
|
Literal question:
|
To whom do you believe the Norwegian government has a greater moral
obligation to provide economic assistance?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1. PRA2Aba and PRA2Ba is asked on the same page,
and the order is randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The poor in other countries |
49 |
5.9% |
0.05939394 |
| 2 |
The poor in Norway |
282 |
34.2% |
0.34181818 |
| 3 |
The government has an equal moral obligation to assist both |
481 |
58.3% |
0.58303030 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01575758 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7690 |
|
NA |
w03_pra3a
|
Variable label:
|
The effectiveness of financial assistance to reduce poverty in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How effective do you think Norway’s financial assistance programs have
been at reducing poverty in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very effective |
98 |
11.9% |
0.11878788 |
| 2 |
Somewhat effective |
401 |
48.6% |
0.48606061 |
| 3 |
Not too effective |
272 |
33.0% |
0.32969697 |
| 4 |
Not at all effective |
27 |
3.3% |
0.03272727 |
| 97 |
No answer |
27 |
3.3% |
0.03272727 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7690 |
|
NA |
w03_pra4a
|
Variable label:
|
The reason that most recipients of financial assistance are poor
|
|
Literal question:
|
Why do you think most recipients of financial assistance are poor?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Use the scale below where 1 is “Because they don’t work hard enough”
and 7 is “Because of circumstances beyond their control.”
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Because they don't work hard enough |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01939394 |
| 2 |
2 |
27 |
3.3% |
0.03272727 |
| 3 |
3 |
102 |
12.4% |
0.12363636 |
| 4 |
4 |
217 |
26.3% |
0.26303030 |
| 5 |
5 |
235 |
28.5% |
0.28484848 |
| 6 |
6 |
141 |
17.1% |
0.17090909 |
| 7 |
7 – Because of circumstances beyond their control |
66 |
8.0% |
0.08000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02545455 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7690 |
|
NA |
w03_pra5a
|
Variable label:
|
Probability that recipients of financial assistance lacked basic
necessities before they got help from the Norwegian authorities
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that the recipients of financial assistance lacked
basic necessities such as shelter and nutritious food before receiving
assistance from the Norwegian government?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
148 |
17.9% |
0.17939394 |
| 2 |
Somewhat likely |
446 |
54.1% |
0.54060606 |
| 3 |
Not too likely |
190 |
23.0% |
0.23030303 |
| 4 |
Not at all likely |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01090909 |
| 97 |
No answer |
32 |
3.9% |
0.03878788 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7690 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1b
|
Variable label:
|
Increase, maintain or reduce amount spent on foreign aid
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we would like to ask you about Norway’s foreign aid programs.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some people think that the amount the Norwegian government spends on
foreign aid should be increased, while others believe it should be
maintained at the present level, or decreased. What is your opinion, do
you think the Norwegian government should increase, maintain, or
decrease the amount it spends on foreign aid?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Increased |
188 |
21.9% |
0.21911422 |
| 2 |
Maintained |
461 |
53.7% |
0.53729604 |
| 3 |
Decreased |
195 |
22.7% |
0.22727273 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.6% |
0.01631702 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7657 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1ba
|
Variable label:
|
Increase the amount spent on foreign aid a good deal, or just a little
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the Norwegian government should increase spending on
foreign aid quite a bit or just a little?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2, and PRA1B=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Quite a bit |
161 |
85.6% |
0.8563830 |
| 2 |
Just a little |
25 |
13.3% |
0.1329787 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.1% |
0.0106383 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8327 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1bb
|
Variable label:
|
Reduce amount spent on foreign aid a good deal, or just a little
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the Norwegian government should decrease spending on
foreign aid quite a bit or just a little?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2, and PRA1B=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Quite a bit |
143 |
73.3% |
0.73333333 |
| 2 |
Just a little |
50 |
25.6% |
0.25641026 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.0% |
0.01025641 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8320 |
|
NA |
w03_pra2abb
|
Variable label:
|
Norwegian authorities have a moral obligation to give aid to the poor in
other countries
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian government has a moral
obligation to provide financial assistance to the poor in other
countries?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2. PRA2Abb and PRA2Bb is asked on the same page,
and the order is randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree strongly |
362 |
42.2% |
0.42191142 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
346 |
40.3% |
0.40326340 |
| 3 |
Disagree somewhat |
93 |
10.8% |
0.10839161 |
| 4 |
Disagree strongly |
38 |
4.4% |
0.04428904 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02214452 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7657 |
|
NA |
w03_pra2bb
|
Variable label:
|
Whom should receive economic assistance
|
|
Literal question:
|
To whom do you believe the Norwegian government has a greater moral
obligation to provide economic assistance?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2. PRA2Abb and PRA2Bb is asked on the same page,
and the order is randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The poor in other countries |
41 |
4.8% |
0.04778555 |
| 2 |
The poor in Norway |
290 |
33.8% |
0.33799534 |
| 3 |
The government has an equal moral obligation to assist both |
509 |
59.3% |
0.59324009 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7657 |
|
NA |
| 97 |
|
18 |
2.1% |
0.02097902 |
w03_pra3b
|
Variable label:
|
The effectiveness of aid programs to reduce poverty in other countries
|
|
Literal question:
|
How effective do you think Norway’s foreign aid programs have been at
reducing poverty in other countries?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very effective |
44 |
5.1% |
0.05128205 |
| 2 |
Somewhat effective |
420 |
49.0% |
0.48951049 |
| 3 |
Not too effective |
313 |
36.5% |
0.36480186 |
| 4 |
Not at all effective |
57 |
6.6% |
0.06643357 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
2.8% |
0.02797203 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7657 |
|
NA |
w03_pra4b
|
Variable label:
|
The reason that most recipients of aid are poor
|
|
Literal question:
|
Why do you think most recipients of foreign aid are poor? Use the scale
below where 1 is “Because they don’t work hard enough” and 7 is “Because
of circumstances beyond their control.”
|
|
Technical description:
|
Use the scale below where 1 is “Because they don’t work hard enough”
and 7 is “Because of circumstances beyond their control.”
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Because they don't work hard enough |
10 |
1.2% |
0.011655012 |
| 2 |
2 |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008158508 |
| 3 |
3 |
20 |
2.3% |
0.023310023 |
| 4 |
4 |
97 |
11.3% |
0.113053613 |
| 5 |
5 |
191 |
22.3% |
0.222610723 |
| 6 |
6 |
206 |
24.0% |
0.240093240 |
| 7 |
7 – Because of circumstances beyond their control |
310 |
36.1% |
0.361305361 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.0% |
0.019813520 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7657 |
|
NA |
w03_pra5b
|
Variable label:
|
Probability that recipients of financial assistance lacked basic
necessities before they got help from the Norwegian authorities
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that the recipients of foreign aid lacked basic
necessities such as shelter and nutritious food before receiving
assistance from the Norwegian government?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
399 |
46.5% |
0.465034965 |
| 2 |
Somewhat likely |
350 |
40.8% |
0.407925408 |
| 3 |
Not too likely |
72 |
8.4% |
0.083916084 |
| 4 |
Not at all likely |
3 |
0.3% |
0.003496503 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
4.0% |
0.039627040 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7657 |
|
NA |
w03_ran43
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1676] [Invalid:6839]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
565 |
33.7% |
0.3371122 |
| 2 |
2 |
556 |
33.2% |
0.3317422 |
| 3 |
3 |
555 |
33.1% |
0.3311456 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6839 |
|
NA |
w03_wsj1a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Suspected terrorist attacks from the extreme right, the authorities
entitled to: Hold people in custody as long as they want to without
having them stand trial
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) states that they are
receiving a growing number of notes of concern and tips on people who
share Breivik’s right-wing extremist views. Imagine that the authorities
suspected that a terrorist attack from right-wing extremists was
imminent. Do you think the authorities should have the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hold people in custody as long as they want to without having them stand
trial?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Should definitely have the right to |
87 |
15.4% |
0.15398230 |
| 2 |
Should probably have the right to |
128 |
22.7% |
0.22654867 |
| 3 |
Should probably not have the right to |
121 |
21.4% |
0.21415929 |
| 4 |
Should definitely not have the right to |
176 |
31.2% |
0.31150442 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
3.2% |
0.03185841 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7950 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
35 |
6.2% |
0.06194690 |
w03_wsj1a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Suspected terrorist attacks from the extreme right, the authorities
entitled to: Randomly stop and search people on the street
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) states that they are
receiving a growing number of notes of concern and tips on people who
share Breivik’s right-wing extremist views. Imagine that the authorities
suspected that a terrorist attack from right-wing extremists was
imminent. Do you think the authorities should have the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Randomly stop and search people on the street?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Should definitely have the right to |
85 |
15.0% |
0.15044248 |
| 2 |
Should probably have the right to |
177 |
31.3% |
0.31327434 |
| 3 |
Should probably not have the right to |
116 |
20.5% |
0.20530973 |
| 4 |
Should definitely not have the right to |
144 |
25.5% |
0.25486726 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.8% |
0.02831858 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7950 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
27 |
4.8% |
0.04778761 |
w03_wsj2b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Suspected terrorist attacks from Islamic extremism, the authorities
entitled to: Hold people in custody as long as they want to without
having them stand trial
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) states that politically
motivated violence in the form of Islamic extremism represents a serious
threat to security in Norway. Imagine that the authorities suspected
that a terrorist attack from Islamists was imminent. Do you think the
authorities should have the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hold people in custody as long as they want to without having them stand
trial?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Should definitely have the right to |
100 |
18.0% |
0.17985612 |
| 2 |
Should probably have the right to |
159 |
28.6% |
0.28597122 |
| 3 |
Should probably not have the right to |
118 |
21.2% |
0.21223022 |
| 4 |
Should definitely not have the right to |
149 |
26.8% |
0.26798561 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.0% |
0.01978417 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7959 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
19 |
3.4% |
0.03417266 |
w03_wsj2b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Suspected terrorist attacks from Islamic extremism, the authorities
entitled to: Randomly stop and search people on the street
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) states that politically
motivated violence in the form of Islamic extremism represents a serious
threat to security in Norway. Imagine that the authorities suspected
that a terrorist attack from Islamists was imminent. Do you think the
authorities should have the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Randomly stop and search people on the street?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Should definitely have the right to |
102 |
18.3% |
0.18345324 |
| 2 |
Should probably have the right to |
204 |
36.7% |
0.36690647 |
| 3 |
Should probably not have the right to |
106 |
19.1% |
0.19064748 |
| 4 |
Should definitely not have the right to |
108 |
19.4% |
0.19424460 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02697842 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7959 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
21 |
3.8% |
0.03776978 |
w03_wsj3c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Suspected terrorist attacks, authorities entitled to: Hold people in
custody as long as they want to without having them stand trial
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was
imminent. Do you think the authorities should have the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hold people in custody as long as they want to without having them stand
trial?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Should definitely have the right to |
88 |
15.9% |
0.15855856 |
| 2 |
Should probably have the right to |
155 |
27.9% |
0.27927928 |
| 3 |
Should probably not have the right to |
136 |
24.5% |
0.24504505 |
| 4 |
Should definitely not have the right to |
133 |
24.0% |
0.23963964 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02702703 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7960 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
28 |
5.0% |
0.05045045 |
w03_wsj3c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Suspected terrorist attacks, authorities entitled to: Randomly stop and
search people on the street
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was
imminent. Do you think the authorities should have the right to:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Randomly stop and search people on the street?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Should definitely have the right to |
129 |
23.2% |
0.23243243 |
| 2 |
Should probably have the right to |
199 |
35.9% |
0.35855856 |
| 3 |
Should probably not have the right to |
111 |
20.0% |
0.20000000 |
| 4 |
Should definitely not have the right to |
77 |
13.9% |
0.13873874 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
2.5% |
0.02522523 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7960 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
Don't know |
25 |
4.5% |
0.04504505 |
w03_wsj2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Concern that there will be new terrorist attacks in Norway in the near
future
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you that there will be new terrorist attacks in Norway
in the near future?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very concerned |
120 |
7.3% |
0.07250755 |
| 2 |
Quite concerned |
573 |
34.6% |
0.34622356 |
| 3 |
Not very concerned |
828 |
50.0% |
0.50030211 |
| 4 |
Not concerned at all |
97 |
5.9% |
0.05861027 |
| 5 |
Don't know |
37 |
2.2% |
0.02235650 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6860 |
|
NA |
w03_wsj2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Concern that future terrorist acts will affect you, your family or your
friends
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you concerned that future terrorist actions will
affect you, your family or your friends?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very concerned |
88 |
5.3% |
0.05330103 |
| 2 |
Quite concerned |
318 |
19.3% |
0.19261054 |
| 3 |
Not very concerned |
977 |
59.2% |
0.59176257 |
| 4 |
Not concerned at all |
230 |
13.9% |
0.13930951 |
| 5 |
Don't know |
38 |
2.3% |
0.02301635 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6864 |
|
NA |
w03_ran44
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1673] [Invalid:6842]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
835 |
49.9% |
0.4991034 |
| 2 |
2 |
838 |
50.1% |
0.5008966 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6842 |
|
NA |
w03_ran45
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:835] [Invalid:7680]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
408 |
48.9% |
0.4886228 |
| 2 |
2 |
427 |
51.1% |
0.5113772 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat1a
|
Variable label:
|
For or against control to increase government control of food safety,
severe symptoms
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
“Some point to recent cases of food recalls, such as the recall of green
onions carrying e. coli and the recall of fish believed to cause a
listeriosis outbreak, as evidence that we need greater FDA
(Mattillsynet) oversight. Illnesses such as these can cause serious
symptoms that can be life-threatening for some. Others say that while
food borne diseases are a serious concern, the fact that few were harmed
in even the worst incidents is evidence that FDA (Mattilsynet) oversight
is working as intended and is effective at protecting the public from
food borne diseases.”
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly do you favor or oppose increasing government regulation of
food safety?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1, and ran45=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly favor |
91 |
22.3% |
0.223039216 |
| 2 |
Moderately favor |
114 |
27.9% |
0.279411765 |
| 3 |
Slightly favor |
95 |
23.3% |
0.232843137 |
| 4 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
71 |
17.4% |
0.174019608 |
| 5 |
Slightly oppose |
18 |
4.4% |
0.044117647 |
| 6 |
Moderately oppose |
11 |
2.7% |
0.026960784 |
| 7 |
Strongly oppose |
6 |
1.5% |
0.014705882 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004901961 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8107 |
|
NA |
w03_mat1aa
|
Variable label:
|
Concern over how safe the food is
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about how safe food is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1, and ran45=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not concerned at all |
57 |
14.0% |
0.139705882 |
| 2 |
Not too concerned |
177 |
43.4% |
0.433823529 |
| 3 |
Moderately concerned |
131 |
32.1% |
0.321078431 |
| 4 |
Very concerned |
32 |
7.8% |
0.078431373 |
| 5 |
Extremely concerned |
8 |
2.0% |
0.019607843 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.7% |
0.007352941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8107 |
|
NA |
w03_mat1b
|
Variable label:
|
For or against control to increase government control of food safety,
severe symptoms including abdominal cramps, bloody diarrhea, nausea and
vomiting
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some point to recent cases of food recalls, such as the recall of green
onions contaminated with e. coli and the recall of fish believed to
cause a listeriosis outbreak, as evidence that we need greater FDA
(Mattillsynet) oversight. Bacterial and viral infections such as these
can cause serious symptoms, including stomach cramps, bloody diarrhea,
nausea, and vomiting. In some cases these infections can be
life-threatening. Others say that while food borne diseases are a
serious concern, the fact that few were harmed in even the worst
incidents is evidence that FDA (Mattilsynet) oversight is working as
intended and is effective at protecting the public from food borne
diseases.”
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly do you favor or oppose increasing government regulation of
food safety?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1, and ran45=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly favor |
111 |
26.0% |
0.25995316 |
| 2 |
Moderately favor |
123 |
28.8% |
0.28805621 |
| 3 |
Slightly favor |
80 |
18.7% |
0.18735363 |
| 4 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
67 |
15.7% |
0.15690867 |
| 5 |
Slightly oppose |
18 |
4.2% |
0.04215457 |
| 6 |
Moderately oppose |
20 |
4.7% |
0.04683841 |
| 7 |
Strongly oppose |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.9% |
0.01873536 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8088 |
|
NA |
w03_mat1bb
|
Variable label:
|
Concern over how safe the food is
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about how safe food is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1, and ran45=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not concerned at all |
54 |
12.6% |
0.126463700 |
| 2 |
Not too concerned |
196 |
45.9% |
0.459016393 |
| 3 |
Moderately concerned |
139 |
32.6% |
0.325526932 |
| 4 |
Very concerned |
27 |
6.3% |
0.063231850 |
| 5 |
Extremely concerned |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009367681 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.6% |
0.016393443 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8088 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Seeing some mold on old leftovers in your
refrigerator
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how
disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Seeing some mold on old leftovers in your refrigerator.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
140 |
16.8% |
0.16766467 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
264 |
31.6% |
0.31616766 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
274 |
32.8% |
0.32814371 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
105 |
12.6% |
0.12574850 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
34 |
4.1% |
0.04071856 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.2% |
0.02155689 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Standing close to a person who has body odor
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how
disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Standing close to a person who has body odor.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01796407 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
77 |
9.2% |
0.09221557 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
359 |
43.0% |
0.42994012 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
269 |
32.2% |
0.32215569 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
98 |
11.7% |
0.11736527 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02035928 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Shaking hands with a stranger who has sweaty
palms
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how
disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Shaking hands with a stranger who has sweaty palms.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
68 |
8.1% |
0.08143713 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
262 |
31.4% |
0.31377246 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
371 |
44.4% |
0.44431138 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
98 |
11.7% |
0.11736527 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02395210 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01916168 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Stepping on dog poop
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how
disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Stepping on dog poop.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
22 |
2.6% |
0.02634731 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
96 |
11.5% |
0.11497006 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
290 |
34.7% |
0.34730539 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
281 |
33.7% |
0.33652695 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
125 |
15.0% |
0.14970060 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02514970 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_5
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Accidentally touching a person’s bloody cut
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how
disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Accidentally touching a person’s bloody cut.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
39 |
4.7% |
0.04670659 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
144 |
17.2% |
0.17245509 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
282 |
33.8% |
0.33772455 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
243 |
29.1% |
0.29101796 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
108 |
12.9% |
0.12934132 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02275449 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_6
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Seeing a cockroach run across the floor
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how
disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Seeing a cockroach run across the floor.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
114 |
13.7% |
0.13652695 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
182 |
21.8% |
0.21796407 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
235 |
28.1% |
0.28143713 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
185 |
22.2% |
0.22155689 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
101 |
12.1% |
0.12095808 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.2% |
0.02155689 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_7
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Sitting next to someone who has red sores on
their arm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how
disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sitting next to someone who has red sores on their arm.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
133 |
15.9% |
0.15928144 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
309 |
37.0% |
0.37005988 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
293 |
35.1% |
0.35089820 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
69 |
8.3% |
0.08263473 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01796407 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01916168 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat4
|
Variable label:
|
Concern that vaccines can cause serious side effects in children
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you that vaccines can lead to serious side effects in
children?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not concerned at all |
139 |
16.6% |
0.16587112 |
| 2 |
Not too concerned |
275 |
32.8% |
0.32816229 |
| 3 |
Moderately concerned |
322 |
38.4% |
0.38424821 |
| 4 |
Very concerned |
79 |
9.4% |
0.09427208 |
| 5 |
Extremely concerned |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01431981 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01312649 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Support for the following guidelines: Ban on the use of growth hormones
for fish, poultry and cattle
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strongly would you support or oppose each of the following
guidelines?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Ban on the use of growth hormones for fish, poultry and cattle.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly support |
369 |
44.0% |
0.44033413 |
| 2 |
Moderately support |
129 |
15.4% |
0.15393795 |
| 3 |
Support a little |
51 |
6.1% |
0.06085919 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
84 |
10.0% |
0.10023866 |
| 5 |
Oppose a little |
32 |
3.8% |
0.03818616 |
| 6 |
Moderately oppose |
50 |
6.0% |
0.05966587 |
| 7 |
Strongly oppose |
108 |
12.9% |
0.12887828 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01789976 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Support for the following guidelines: Ban on genetically modified
commodities, for example fruit and vegetables
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strongly would you support or oppose each of the following
guidelines?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Ban on genetically modified commodities, for example fruit and
vegetables.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly support |
302 |
36.0% |
0.36038186 |
| 2 |
Moderately support |
143 |
17.1% |
0.17064439 |
| 3 |
Support a little |
74 |
8.8% |
0.08830549 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
88 |
10.5% |
0.10501193 |
| 5 |
Oppose a little |
45 |
5.4% |
0.05369928 |
| 6 |
Moderately oppose |
69 |
8.2% |
0.08233890 |
| 7 |
Strongly oppose |
101 |
12.1% |
0.12052506 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01909308 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Support for the following guidelines: Providing government support to
farmers who cultivate certified ecological foodstuffs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strongly would you support or oppose each of the following
guidelines?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Providing government support to farmers who cultivate certified
ecological foodstuffs.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly support |
294 |
35.1% |
0.35083532 |
| 2 |
Moderately support |
191 |
22.8% |
0.22792363 |
| 3 |
Support a little |
129 |
15.4% |
0.15393795 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
111 |
13.2% |
0.13245823 |
| 5 |
Oppose a little |
26 |
3.1% |
0.03102625 |
| 6 |
Moderately oppose |
33 |
3.9% |
0.03937947 |
| 7 |
Strongly oppose |
36 |
4.3% |
0.04295943 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02147971 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Seeing some mold on old leftovers in your
refrigerator
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how
disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Discovering mould on old leftovers in your own refrigerator.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
134 |
16.0% |
0.15990453 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
279 |
33.3% |
0.33293556 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
245 |
29.2% |
0.29236277 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
125 |
14.9% |
0.14916468 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
37 |
4.4% |
0.04415274 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02147971 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Standing close to a person who has body odor
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how
disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Standing close to a person with unpleasant body odour.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01551313 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
109 |
13.0% |
0.13007160 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
346 |
41.3% |
0.41288783 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
263 |
31.4% |
0.31384248 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
90 |
10.7% |
0.10739857 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02028640 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Shaking hands with a stranger who has sweaty
palms
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how
disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Shaking hands with a stranger who has sweaty hands.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
73 |
8.7% |
0.08711217 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
268 |
32.0% |
0.31980907 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
358 |
42.7% |
0.42720764 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
102 |
12.2% |
0.12171838 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02386635 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02028640 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Stepping on dog poop
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how
disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Stepping in dog faeces.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
25 |
3.0% |
0.02983294 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
99 |
11.8% |
0.11813842 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
289 |
34.5% |
0.34486874 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
295 |
35.2% |
0.35202864 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
109 |
13.0% |
0.13007160 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02505967 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_5
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Accidentally touching a person’s bloody cut
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how
disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Stepping in dog faeces.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
45 |
5.4% |
0.05369928 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
154 |
18.4% |
0.18377088 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
272 |
32.5% |
0.32458234 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
229 |
27.3% |
0.27326969 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
119 |
14.2% |
0.14200477 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02267303 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_6
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Seeing a cockroach run across the floor
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how
disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Seeing a cockroach run across the floor.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
124 |
14.8% |
0.14797136 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
182 |
21.7% |
0.21718377 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
256 |
30.5% |
0.30548926 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
164 |
19.6% |
0.19570406 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
97 |
11.6% |
0.11575179 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01789976 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_7
|
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Sitting next to someone who has red sores on
their arm
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how
disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sitting next to a person who has red sores on the arm.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not disgusting at all |
138 |
16.5% |
0.16467780 |
| 2 |
Not too disgusting |
313 |
37.4% |
0.37350835 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
272 |
32.5% |
0.32458234 |
| 4 |
Very disgusting |
74 |
8.8% |
0.08830549 |
| 5 |
Extremely disgusting |
24 |
2.9% |
0.02863962 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.0% |
0.02028640 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k20
|
Variable label:
|
Respondents background
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the descriptions fits best with what you have done for the past
7 days?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Check one option.
[Only asked new respondents, and old respodents where the information is
missing]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In paid work (or temporarily absent) |
3547 |
62.6% |
0.626457082 |
| 2 |
In education (not paid for by employer) |
415 |
7.3% |
0.073295655 |
| 3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
113 |
2.0% |
0.019957612 |
| 4 |
Unemployed, want a job but not actively seeking work |
37 |
0.7% |
0.006534793 |
| 5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
203 |
3.6% |
0.035853055 |
| 6 |
Retired |
908 |
16.0% |
0.160367361 |
| 7 |
In civilian national service or military service |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001236312 |
| 8 |
Staying at home, looking after children or other persons |
74 |
1.3% |
0.013069587 |
| 9 |
Other |
166 |
2.9% |
0.029318262 |
| 97 |
No answer |
192 |
3.4% |
0.033910279 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2853 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k21
|
Variable label:
|
Respondents business
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K20=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
344 |
9.7% |
0.096983366 |
| 2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1014 |
28.6% |
0.285875388 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
187 |
5.3% |
0.052720609 |
| 4 |
Private business |
1701 |
48.0% |
0.479560192 |
| 5 |
Private business |
194 |
5.5% |
0.054694108 |
| 6 |
Other: |
97 |
2.7% |
0.027347054 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
0.3% |
0.002819284 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4968 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k21_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Respondents business [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K20=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k323
|
Variable label:
|
The name or title of the main occupation [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the name or title of your main job? Please write your full job
title. Be as specific as you can.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Here are some examples: Nurse, Teacher at an upper secondary school,
Shop worker
[Asked if R3K20=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k323a
|
Variable label:
|
Main tasks or duties in the main occupation [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are your main tasks or duties in your main job? Please be as
detailed as possible in your description.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Here are some examples: Provide help and medications at a senior
citizens’ community centre. Create educational programmes, teach
Norwegian and mathematics and grade papers. Sell shoes and help
customers in the shop.
[Asked if R3K20=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k23b
|
Variable label:
|
Responsible for directing other employees in the main job
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you responsible for supervising the work of other employees in your
main work?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K20=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
2405 |
67.8% |
0.678037778 |
| 2 |
Yes, I supervise 10 or more employees |
399 |
11.2% |
0.112489428 |
| 3 |
Yes, I supervise 10 or less employees |
719 |
20.3% |
0.202706513 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
0.7% |
0.006766281 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4968 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k24
|
Variable label:
|
Workplace in oil or gas industry, or closely linked to it
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is your workplace in the oil and gas sector, or closely related to it?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K20=1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I work in the oil and gas sector |
199 |
5.6% |
0.05610375 |
| 2 |
Yes, I work in the oil and gas sector |
182 |
5.1% |
0.05131097 |
| 3 |
No |
3124 |
88.1% |
0.88074429 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.2% |
0.01184099 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4968 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k25
|
Variable label:
|
Current income
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was
missing]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
< 150 000 |
704 |
11.8% |
0.11843876 |
| 2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
906 |
15.2% |
0.15242261 |
| 3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
992 |
16.7% |
0.16689098 |
| 4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1084 |
18.2% |
0.18236878 |
| 5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
734 |
12.3% |
0.12348587 |
| 6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
379 |
6.4% |
0.06376178 |
| 7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
435 |
7.3% |
0.07318304 |
| 8 |
>1 000 000 |
177 |
3.0% |
0.02977793 |
| 97 |
No answer |
533 |
9.0% |
0.08967026 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2571 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k26
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was
missing]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
38 |
0.7% |
0.006704305 |
| 2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
51 |
0.9% |
0.008997883 |
| 3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
495 |
8.7% |
0.087332392 |
| 4 |
College certificate |
52 |
0.9% |
0.009174312 |
| 5 |
Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education
programme, one-year post admission |
742 |
13.1% |
0.130910374 |
| 6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
777 |
13.7% |
0.137085392 |
| 7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
55 |
1.0% |
0.009703599 |
| 8 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
197 |
3.5% |
0.034756528 |
| 9 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
501 |
8.8% |
0.088390967 |
| 10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
1007 |
17.8% |
0.177664079 |
| 11 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
357 |
6.3% |
0.062985180 |
| 12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
360 |
6.4% |
0.063514467 |
| 13 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
566 |
10.0% |
0.099858857 |
| 14 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
90 |
1.6% |
0.015878617 |
| 15 |
None of these |
145 |
2.6% |
0.025582216 |
| 97 |
No answer |
235 |
4.1% |
0.041460833 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2847 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k27
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Click on what is most suitable to you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was
missing]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never been married |
715 |
12.6% |
0.1262804663 |
| 2 |
Married |
2852 |
50.4% |
0.5037089368 |
| 3 |
Legally registered partner |
14 |
0.2% |
0.0024726245 |
| 4 |
Cohabitant |
1052 |
18.6% |
0.1858000706 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated |
401 |
7.1% |
0.0708230307 |
| 6 |
Former cohabitant |
217 |
3.8% |
0.0383256800 |
| 7 |
Former legally registered partner |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008830802 |
| 8 |
Widow/widower |
132 |
2.3% |
0.0233133168 |
| 9 |
Other: |
74 |
1.3% |
0.0130695867 |
| 97 |
No answer |
200 |
3.5% |
0.0353232073 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2853 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k27_9_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Marital status [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Click on what is most suitable to you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information
was missing]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k28
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was
missing]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
5069 |
89.6% |
0.89637489 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
390 |
6.9% |
0.06896552 |
| 97 |
No answer |
196 |
3.5% |
0.03465959 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2860 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k28_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship: Other country [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information
was missing]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k29
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was
missing]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
4879 |
86.2% |
0.862014134 |
| 2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
390 |
6.9% |
0.068904594 |
| 3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
31 |
0.5% |
0.005477032 |
| 4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
96 |
1.7% |
0.016961131 |
| 5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
67 |
1.2% |
0.011837456 |
| 97 |
No answer |
197 |
3.5% |
0.034805654 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2855 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k30_1
|
Variable label:
|
Homeland before immigration to Norway [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did you live in before immigrating?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K29=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k30_2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Mother: Homeland before immigration to Norway [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did you parents live in (mother, father or both) before
they immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Mother:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K29=3 or R3K29=4 or R3K29=5]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3k30_2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Father: Homeland before immigration to Norway [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did you parents live in (mother, father or both) before
they immigrated?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Father:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K29=3 or R3K29=4 or R3K29=5]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
w03_r3hp1
|
Variable label:
|
Health condition
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, would you say that your health is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
1106 |
19.8% |
0.19792412 |
| 2 |
Very good |
2072 |
37.1% |
0.37079456 |
| 3 |
Good |
1519 |
27.2% |
0.27183250 |
| 4 |
Quite good |
498 |
8.9% |
0.08911954 |
| 5 |
Poor |
198 |
3.5% |
0.03543307 |
| 97 |
No answer |
195 |
3.5% |
0.03489621 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2927 |
|
NA |
w03_P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
4244 |
49.8% |
0.4984146 |
| 2 |
Female |
4271 |
50.2% |
0.5015854 |
w03_P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
2345 |
27.5% |
0.27539636 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
2079 |
24.4% |
0.24415737 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
415 |
4.9% |
0.04873752 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
2244 |
26.4% |
0.26353494 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
745 |
8.7% |
0.08749266 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
687 |
8.1% |
0.08068115 |
w03_P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus |
1052 |
12.4% |
0.123546682 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
1293 |
15.2% |
0.151849677 |
| 3 |
Østfold |
440 |
5.2% |
0.051673517 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
434 |
5.1% |
0.050968878 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
258 |
3.0% |
0.030299472 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
262 |
3.1% |
0.030769231 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
424 |
5.0% |
0.049794480 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
261 |
3.1% |
0.030651791 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
265 |
3.1% |
0.031121550 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
150 |
1.8% |
0.017615972 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
771 |
9.1% |
0.090546095 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
960 |
11.3% |
0.112742220 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
144 |
1.7% |
0.016911333 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
369 |
4.3% |
0.043335291 |
| 15 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
584 |
6.9% |
0.068584850 |
| 16 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
161 |
1.9% |
0.018907810 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
351 |
4.1% |
0.041221374 |
| 18 |
Troms |
259 |
3.0% |
0.030416911 |
| 19 |
Finmark |
77 |
0.9% |
0.009042866 |
w03_P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
877 |
10.3% |
0.10299472 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary eduction |
2627 |
30.9% |
0.30851439 |
| 3 |
University/university college |
4467 |
52.5% |
0.52460364 |
| 97 |
No answer |
544 |
6.4% |
0.06388726 |
w03_P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education [obtained from w01_k26]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
55 |
0.6% |
0.006459190 |
| 2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
64 |
0.8% |
0.007516148 |
| 3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
758 |
8.9% |
0.089019378 |
| 4 |
College certificate |
87 |
1.0% |
0.010217264 |
| 5 |
Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education
programme, one-year post admission |
1103 |
13.0% |
0.129536113 |
| 6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
1129 |
13.3% |
0.132589548 |
| 7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
88 |
1.0% |
0.010334703 |
| 8 |
Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical
college) |
307 |
3.6% |
0.036054022 |
| 9 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
768 |
9.0% |
0.090193776 |
| 10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
1577 |
18.5% |
0.185202584 |
| 11 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
552 |
6.5% |
0.064826776 |
| 12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
540 |
6.3% |
0.063417499 |
| 13 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
891 |
10.5% |
0.104638873 |
| 14 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
139 |
1.6% |
0.016324134 |
| 15 |
None of these |
222 |
2.6% |
0.026071638 |
| 97 |
No answer |
235 |
2.8% |
0.027598356 |
w03_P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8514] [Invalid:1] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
311 |
3.7% |
0.03652807 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
1320 |
15.5% |
0.15503876 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
1785 |
21.0% |
0.20965469 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
1719 |
20.2% |
0.20190275 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
1459 |
17.1% |
0.17136481 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
1206 |
14.2% |
0.14164905 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
714 |
8.4% |
0.08386187 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
w03_P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8514] [Invalid:1] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
3416 |
40.1% |
0.40122152 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
4384 |
51.5% |
0.51491661 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
714 |
8.4% |
0.08386187 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
w03_Weight_1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2 and P1. See documentation report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]
|
w03_Weight_2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4_1 and P1. See documentation
report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
w03_Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]
|
