Citation
Researchers responsible
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
|
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø
|
UiB
|
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
|
Troy Saghaug Broderstad
|
UiT
|
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
|
Marta Rekdal Eidheim
|
UiB
|
|
Thea Gregersen
|
NORCE
|
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
|
Arjan Schakel
|
UiB
|
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
UiB
|
Coordinating team
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
|
Emilie Midtsæter Strønen
|
UiB
|
|
Sina Storelv
|
UiB
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Georg Stokke
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Sikt - Norwegian Agency for
Shared Services in Education and Research. The Norwegian Citizen Panel
welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about
calls and other updates are available at
uib.no/en/citizen
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Universe: Norwegian citizens 18 years
or older.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in the
following waves:
|
Round
|
Sample size
|
Recruited
|
|
1
|
25 000
|
4 870
|
|
3
|
25 000
|
5 623
|
|
8
|
22 000
|
4 245
|
|
11
|
14 000
|
2 069
|
|
14
|
14 000
|
2 036
|
|
16
|
34 000
|
5 163
|
|
18
|
14 000
|
2 048
|
|
22
|
23 000
|
3 221
|
|
25
|
18 000
|
2 405
|
|
30
|
25 000
|
3 746
|
All samples are drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register.
The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d)
gender, and e) age. Phone number was joined with the data using
Data
Factory from wave 30 and onwards. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal
recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from
previous waves:
https://surveybanken.sikt.no/en/series/ed271b1c-2595-47e4-8c97-3fcc00f02368.
Screenshots of the questions are available on request from DIGSSCORE.
In wave 31, email invitations were sent out on 4th of November 2024 for
softlaunch, and on the 5th of November for the main launch.
An email with reminder was sent out three times; 8th of November, 13th
of November, and 19th of November, to respondents who: a) had not logged
in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with
registered mobile numbers received the second reminder via text message.
Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by email.
Wave 31 ended on the 25th of November 2024.
Weighting
To compensate for observed bias, a weight has been calculated. The
weight equal the relation between a given strata in the population and
the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in
the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values
around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive
a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below
1.
When calculating the weight, the information regarding the respondent’s
geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These
attributes were included in the sample file we received from the
Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of
education is provided by the respondents when answering the
questionnaire. Respondents with missing data on the education variable
are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight
is set to 1 in these cases).
One weight have been calculated:
-
Weight combining gender, age, geography, and two-part education.
When applied, the weight will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weight are calculated using
the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized) sub-groups,
which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group compared to
the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, data is included in
the dataset which indicates the proportion size of strata in the
population.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to
make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with
the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-101
|
2025-02-21
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 31
|
|
NA
|
2025-02-21
|
c31_pcpar
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2025-02-17
|
r31_pcpar
|
Added
variable: Coded version of r31_pcpar_raw
|
|
NA
|
2025-02-17
|
r31_pcpam
|
Added
variable: Coded version of r31_pcpam_raw
|
|
NA
|
2025-02-17
|
r31_pcmipo_1_coded1
|
Added
variable: Coded version of r31_pcmipo_1
|
|
NA
|
2025-02-17
|
r31_pcmipo_2_coded1
|
Added
variable: Coded version of r31_pcmipo_2
|
|
NA
|
2025-02-17
|
r31_pcmipo_3_coded1
|
Added
variable: Coded version of r31_pcmipo_3
|
|
NA
|
2025-02-17
|
r31_pcpar
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2025-02-17
|
r31_pcpam
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2025-02-17
|
r31_pcmipo_1_coded1
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2025-02-17
|
r31_pcmipo_2_coded1
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2025-02-17
|
r31_pcmipo_3_coded1
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-100
|
2024-12-09
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 31
|
|
NA
|
2024-12-04
|
r31_pceum
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-09-02
|
r29_bgscp_mask
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-27
|
c26_bginc
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-27
|
c27_bgoily_decade
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-18
|
c26_pcipe
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-18
|
c26_pcepe
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-18
|
r29_pcldpsv
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-18
|
r29_pcldpk
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-18
|
r29_pcldph
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-18
|
r29_pcldpf
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-18
|
r29_pcldpv
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-18
|
r29_pcldpsp
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-18
|
r29_pcldpm
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-18
|
r29_pcldpa
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-18
|
r29_pcldpr
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-06-13
|
r29_pcmsc
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-03-12
|
r28_pcvot23m
|
Updated
variable: New versions of r28_pcvot23m that includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2024-03-12
|
r28_pcvot23c
|
Updated
variable: New versions of r28_pcvot23c that includes coded
other-statements
|
|
NA
|
2024-03-12
|
r28_pcvot23m
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-03-12
|
r28_pcvot23c
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2024-01-23
|
r28_pcvot23m
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 31 - v-101-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
11515
|
|
# Variables
|
519
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r31_rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
The wave the respondent was recruited
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-30]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
1254 |
10.9% |
0.10890143 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
1353 |
11.7% |
0.11749891 |
| 8 |
Wave 8 |
1241 |
10.8% |
0.10777247 |
| 11 |
Wave 11 |
679 |
5.9% |
0.05896657 |
| 14 |
Wave 14 |
660 |
5.7% |
0.05731654 |
| 16 |
Wave 16 |
1835 |
15.9% |
0.15935736 |
| 18 |
Wave 18 |
700 |
6.1% |
0.06079027 |
| 22 |
Wave 22 |
1289 |
11.2% |
0.11194095 |
| 25 |
Wave 25 |
1045 |
9.1% |
0.09075119 |
| 30 |
Wave 30 |
1459 |
12.7% |
0.12670430 |
r31_interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r31_interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10608] [Invalid:907]
[Range:-]
|
r31_browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r31_browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r31_mobil
|
Variable label:
|
Determines if the respondents uses a smartphone or tablet
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determines if the respondents uses a smartphone or tablet
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
5355 |
46.5% |
0.4650456 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
6160 |
53.5% |
0.5349544 |
r31_opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r31_enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
Determines respondents’ device type
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determines respondents’ device type
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
5355 |
46.5% |
0.465045593 |
| 2 |
Touch |
6112 |
53.1% |
0.530785931 |
| 3 |
Generic |
48 |
0.4% |
0.004168476 |
r31_advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r31_getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r31_group
|
Variable label:
|
Subgroup for wave 31.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Group 1 |
2348 |
20.4% |
0.2039079 |
| 2 |
Group 2 |
2337 |
20.3% |
0.2029527 |
| 3 |
Group 3 |
2305 |
20.0% |
0.2001737 |
| 4 |
Group 4 |
2245 |
19.5% |
0.1949631 |
| 5 |
Group 5 |
2280 |
19.8% |
0.1980026 |
r31_pcsag
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
134 |
1.2% |
0.011636995 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2273 |
19.7% |
0.197394703 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
4093 |
35.5% |
0.355449414 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
3465 |
30.1% |
0.300911854 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
1508 |
13.1% |
0.130959618 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.4% |
0.003647416 |
r31_pcpar
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[The order for the alternatives ‘Would not vote’, ‘Would cast a blank
vote’, ‘Not entitled to vote’, and ‘Other’ was not randomized, but kept
at the bottom after the other alternatives.]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:integer] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
327 |
2.8% |
0.028397742 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2340 |
20.3% |
0.203213200 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
1732 |
15.0% |
0.150412505 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
782 |
6.8% |
0.067911420 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1516 |
13.2% |
0.131654364 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
377 |
3.3% |
0.032739904 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
540 |
4.7% |
0.046895354 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1761 |
15.3% |
0.152930960 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
706 |
6.1% |
0.061311333 |
| 10 |
The Industry and Business Party |
198 |
1.7% |
0.017194963 |
| 11 |
Would not vote |
225 |
2.0% |
0.019539731 |
| 12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
405 |
3.5% |
0.035171515 |
| 13 |
Not entitled to vote |
177 |
1.5% |
0.015371255 |
| 14 |
Other: |
403 |
3.5% |
0.034997829 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.2% |
0.002257924 |
r31_pcpar_14_other
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[The order for the alternatives ‘Would not vote’, ‘Would cast a blank
vote’, ‘Not entitled to vote’, and ‘Other’ was not randomized, but kept
at the bottom after the other alternatives.]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:11515] [Range:-]
|
r31_pcpam
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1, 2, 3, 4)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:integer] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
286 |
3.1% |
0.030969139 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2035 |
22.0% |
0.220357336 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
939 |
10.2% |
0.101678397 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
546 |
5.9% |
0.059122902 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
998 |
10.8% |
0.108067136 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
434 |
4.7% |
0.046995127 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
530 |
5.7% |
0.057390363 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1679 |
18.2% |
0.181808338 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
528 |
5.7% |
0.057173795 |
| 10 |
People's Party FNB |
14 |
0.2% |
0.001515972 |
| 11 |
The Industry and Business Party |
154 |
1.7% |
0.016675690 |
| 12 |
A joint party list |
18 |
0.2% |
0.001949107 |
| 13 |
A local list |
221 |
2.4% |
0.023930698 |
| 14 |
Would not vote |
213 |
2.3% |
0.023064429 |
| 15 |
Would cast a blank vote |
299 |
3.2% |
0.032376827 |
| 16 |
Not entitled to vote |
19 |
0.2% |
0.002057390 |
| 17 |
Other: |
279 |
3.0% |
0.030211153 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.5% |
0.004656199 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2280 |
|
NA |
r31_pcpam_17_other
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to
take place tomorrow?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1, 2, 3, 4)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:11515] [Range:-]
|
r31_pcecs
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in
Norway?
Do you think it is:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
1202 |
10.4% |
0.104385584 |
| 2 |
Good |
4121 |
35.8% |
0.357881025 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
2255 |
19.6% |
0.195831524 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
1189 |
10.3% |
0.103256622 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
1622 |
14.1% |
0.140859748 |
| 6 |
Bad |
853 |
7.4% |
0.074077290 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
231 |
2.0% |
0.020060790 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.4% |
0.003647416 |
r31_pcmipo_1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (1)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
1:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:11515] [Range:-]
|
r31_pcmipo_1_coded1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (1)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
1:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can
be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University
of Bergen.]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:integer] [Valid:10850]
[Invalid:665] [Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1001 |
Health |
2286 |
21.1% |
0.2106912442 |
| 2002 |
Environment |
1592 |
14.7% |
0.1467281106 |
| 3003 |
Education |
911 |
8.4% |
0.0839631336 |
| 4004 |
Public infrastructure |
181 |
1.7% |
0.0166820276 |
| 5005 |
Immigration |
320 |
2.9% |
0.0294930876 |
| 6006 |
Economy (private and societal) |
1750 |
16.1% |
0.1612903226 |
| 7007 |
Labour |
225 |
2.1% |
0.0207373272 |
| 8008 |
Welfare |
852 |
7.9% |
0.0785253456 |
| 9009 |
Equality |
104 |
1.0% |
0.0095852535 |
| 1010 |
Culture |
44 |
0.4% |
0.0040552995 |
| 1111 |
Defence |
230 |
2.1% |
0.0211981567 |
| 1212 |
Justice |
237 |
2.2% |
0.0218433180 |
| 1313 |
Industry and trade |
382 |
3.5% |
0.0352073733 |
| 1414 |
Foreign affairs |
385 |
3.5% |
0.0354838710 |
| 1515 |
Regional / urban-rural |
193 |
1.8% |
0.0177880184 |
| 1616 |
International |
110 |
1.0% |
0.0101382488 |
| 1717 |
Senior citizen policies |
95 |
0.9% |
0.0087557604 |
| 1818 |
Family |
437 |
4.0% |
0.0402764977 |
| 1919 |
Tradition |
18 |
0.2% |
0.0016589862 |
| 2020 |
Democracy |
59 |
0.5% |
0.0054377880 |
| 2121 |
Ideology |
9 |
0.1% |
0.0008294931 |
| 2222 |
Freedom and responsibility) |
79 |
0.7% |
0.0072811060 |
| 2323 |
Public and private sector |
159 |
1.5% |
0.0146543779 |
| 2424 |
Ethics |
86 |
0.8% |
0.0079262673 |
| 3030 |
Other |
85 |
0.8% |
0.0078341014 |
| 9696 |
Incomplete answers / Do not know |
12 |
0.1% |
0.0011059908 |
| 9797 |
Unanswered |
8 |
0.1% |
0.0007373272 |
| 1311 |
|
1 |
0.0% |
0.0000921659 |
| Sysmiss |
|
665 |
|
NA |
r31_pcmipo_2
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (2)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
2:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:11515] [Range:-]
|
r31_pcmipo_2_coded1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (2)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
2:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can
be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University
of Bergen.]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:integer] [Valid:10734]
[Invalid:781] [Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1001 |
Health |
2105 |
19.6% |
0.19610583194 |
| 2002 |
Environment |
1359 |
12.7% |
0.12660704304 |
| 3003 |
Education |
1363 |
12.7% |
0.12697969070 |
| 4004 |
Public infrastructure |
448 |
4.2% |
0.04173653810 |
| 5005 |
Immigration |
354 |
3.3% |
0.03297931805 |
| 6006 |
Economy (private and societal) |
1274 |
11.9% |
0.11868828023 |
| 7007 |
Labour |
236 |
2.2% |
0.02198621204 |
| 8008 |
Welfare |
742 |
6.9% |
0.06912614123 |
| 9009 |
Equality |
94 |
0.9% |
0.00875722005 |
| 1010 |
Culture |
66 |
0.6% |
0.00614868642 |
| 1111 |
Defence |
236 |
2.2% |
0.02198621204 |
| 1212 |
Justice |
289 |
2.7% |
0.02692379355 |
| 1313 |
Industry and trade |
434 |
4.0% |
0.04043227129 |
| 1414 |
Foreign affairs |
380 |
3.5% |
0.03540152786 |
| 1515 |
Regional / urban-rural |
208 |
1.9% |
0.01937767841 |
| 1616 |
International |
108 |
1.0% |
0.01006148686 |
| 1717 |
Senior citizen policies |
145 |
1.4% |
0.01350847773 |
| 1818 |
Family |
420 |
3.9% |
0.03912800447 |
| 1919 |
Tradition |
12 |
0.1% |
0.00111794298 |
| 2020 |
Democracy |
46 |
0.4% |
0.00428544811 |
| 2121 |
Ideology |
7 |
0.1% |
0.00065213341 |
| 2222 |
Freedom and responsibility) |
41 |
0.4% |
0.00381963853 |
| 2323 |
Public and private sector |
171 |
1.6% |
0.01593068753 |
| 2424 |
Ethics |
63 |
0.6% |
0.00586920067 |
| 3030 |
Other |
99 |
0.9% |
0.00922302963 |
| 9696 |
Incomplete answers / Do not know |
12 |
0.1% |
0.00111794298 |
| 9797 |
Unanswered |
8 |
0.1% |
0.00074529532 |
| 2000 |
|
1 |
0.0% |
0.00009316192 |
| 2220 |
|
13 |
0.1% |
0.00121110490 |
| Sysmiss |
|
781 |
|
NA |
r31_pcmipo_3
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (3)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
3:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:11515] [Range:-]
|
r31_pcmipo_3_coded1
|
Variable label:
|
Open: What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally? (3)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you
personally?
|
|
Literal question:
|
3:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most
important.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can
be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University
of Bergen.]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:integer] [Valid:10501]
[Invalid:1014] [Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1001 |
Health |
1534 |
14.6% |
0.146081326 |
| 2002 |
Environment |
1431 |
13.6% |
0.136272736 |
| 3003 |
Education |
1177 |
11.2% |
0.112084563 |
| 4004 |
Public infrastructure |
683 |
6.5% |
0.065041425 |
| 5005 |
Immigration |
487 |
4.6% |
0.046376536 |
| 6006 |
Economy (private and societal) |
1212 |
11.5% |
0.115417579 |
| 7007 |
Labour |
237 |
2.3% |
0.022569279 |
| 8008 |
Welfare |
661 |
6.3% |
0.062946386 |
| 9009 |
Equality |
97 |
0.9% |
0.009237216 |
| 1010 |
Culture |
128 |
1.2% |
0.012189315 |
| 1111 |
Defence |
253 |
2.4% |
0.024092944 |
| 1212 |
Justice |
364 |
3.5% |
0.034663365 |
| 1313 |
Industry and trade |
435 |
4.1% |
0.041424626 |
| 1414 |
Foreign affairs |
383 |
3.6% |
0.036472717 |
| 1515 |
Regional / urban-rural |
230 |
2.2% |
0.021902676 |
| 1616 |
International |
146 |
1.4% |
0.013903438 |
| 1717 |
Senior citizen policies |
124 |
1.2% |
0.011808399 |
| 1818 |
Family |
293 |
2.8% |
0.027902105 |
| 1919 |
Tradition |
18 |
0.2% |
0.001714122 |
| 2020 |
Democracy |
77 |
0.7% |
0.007332635 |
| 2121 |
Ideology |
12 |
0.1% |
0.001142748 |
| 2222 |
Freedom and responsibility) |
60 |
0.6% |
0.005713742 |
| 2323 |
Public and private sector |
245 |
2.3% |
0.023331111 |
| 2424 |
Ethics |
60 |
0.6% |
0.005713742 |
| 3030 |
Other |
118 |
1.1% |
0.011237025 |
| 9696 |
Incomplete answers / Do not know |
19 |
0.2% |
0.001809351 |
| 9797 |
Unanswered |
17 |
0.2% |
0.001618893 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1014 |
|
NA |
r31_pceum
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[The question was added to the survey on the 7th of November.
Approximately 5400 respondents had finished the survey at that point.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
596 |
5.2% |
0.05175858 |
| 2 |
Positive |
1002 |
8.7% |
0.08701693 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
1053 |
9.1% |
0.09144594 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
906 |
7.9% |
0.07867998 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
928 |
8.1% |
0.08059053 |
| 6 |
Negative |
902 |
7.8% |
0.07833261 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
728 |
6.3% |
0.06322188 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5400 |
46.9% |
0.46895354 |
r31_dmpfox_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dmpfox].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent has not been
exposed to [r29_tmptrx]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2023] [Invalid:9492]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Conservative Party |
1033 |
51.1% |
0.5106278 |
| 2 |
The Labour Party |
990 |
48.9% |
0.4893722 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9492 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpfox_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dmpfox].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent has not been
exposed to [r29_tmptrx]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2023] [Invalid:9492]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
...has given friends an advantage when making public appointments |
1014 |
50.1% |
0.5012358 |
| 2 |
…likes dressing in a provocative manner |
1009 |
49.9% |
0.4987642 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9492 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpfox_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dmpfox].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent has not been
exposed to [r29_tmptrx]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2023] [Invalid:9492]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
...has failed to assess own impartiality when buying shares |
987 |
48.8% |
0.4878893 |
| 2 |
…likes having a bit too much to drink at parties |
1036 |
51.2% |
0.5121107 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9492 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpfox_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: [r31_dmpfox_ran1] would allow a female politician to
continue in a position of trust even though it is known that she: …has
provided fraudulent information about commuter expenses/housing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know if you agree or disagree that [r31_dmpfox_ran1]
allows a female politician to remain in an important position of trust
even though it is known that she…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…has provided fraudulent information about commuter expenses/housing
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r29_tmptrx]]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
67 |
3.3% |
0.03311913 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
99 |
4.9% |
0.04893722 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
178 |
8.8% |
0.08798814 |
| 4 |
Disagree somewhat |
522 |
25.8% |
0.25803262 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
1144 |
56.5% |
0.56549679 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.6% |
0.00642610 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9492 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpfox_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: [r31_dmpfox_ran1] would allow a female politician to
continue in a position of trust even though it is known that she:
[r31_dmpfox_ran2]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know if you agree or disagree that [r31_dmpfox_ran1]
allows a female politician to remain in an important position of trust
even though it is known that she…
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r31_dmpfox_ran2]
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r29_tmptrx]]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
308 |
15.2% |
0.152249135 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
193 |
9.5% |
0.095402867 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
466 |
23.0% |
0.230350964 |
| 4 |
Disagree somewhat |
287 |
14.2% |
0.141868512 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
758 |
37.5% |
0.374691053 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005437469 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9492 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpfox_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: [r31_dmpfox_ran1] would allow a female politician to
continue in a position of trust even though it is known that she:
[r31_dmpfox_ran3]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know if you agree or disagree that [r31_dmpfox_ran1]
allows a female politician to remain in an important position of trust
even though it is known that she…
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r31_dmpfox_ran3]
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r29_tmptrx]]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
201 |
9.9% |
0.09935739 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
244 |
12.1% |
0.12061295 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
483 |
23.9% |
0.23875433 |
| 4 |
Disagree somewhat |
454 |
22.4% |
0.22441918 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
628 |
31.0% |
0.31043005 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.6% |
0.00642610 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9492 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpfox_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: [r31_dmpfox_ran1] would allow a female politician to
continue in a position of trust even though it is known that she: …has
subjected a young politician to sexual harassment
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know if you agree or disagree that [r31_dmpfox_ran1]
allows a female politician to remain in an important position of trust
even though it is known that she…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…has subjected a young politician to sexual harassment
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r29_tmptrx]]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
54 |
2.7% |
0.026693030 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
40 |
2.0% |
0.019772615 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
140 |
6.9% |
0.069204152 |
| 4 |
Disagree somewhat |
233 |
11.5% |
0.115175482 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
1544 |
76.3% |
0.763222936 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.6% |
0.005931784 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9492 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpfox_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: [r31_dmpfox_ran1] would allow a female politician to
continue in a position of trust even though it is known that she: …has
spread false rumours about a party colleague in public
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know if you agree or disagree that [r31_dmpfox_ran1]
allows a female politician to remain in an important position of trust
even though it is known that she…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…has spread false rumours about a party colleague in public
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r29_tmptrx]]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
48 |
2.4% |
0.023727138 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
65 |
3.2% |
0.032130499 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
211 |
10.4% |
0.104300544 |
| 4 |
Disagree somewhat |
494 |
24.4% |
0.244191794 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
1190 |
58.8% |
0.588235294 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.7% |
0.007414731 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9492 |
|
NA |
r31_eqdiw
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Discrimination against women is no longer a problem in
Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement below?
Discrimination against women is no longer a problem in Norway.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
71 |
3.0% |
0.030238501 |
| 2 |
Agree |
236 |
10.1% |
0.100511073 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
339 |
14.4% |
0.144378194 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
211 |
9.0% |
0.089863714 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
667 |
28.4% |
0.284071550 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
580 |
24.7% |
0.247018739 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
234 |
10.0% |
0.099659284 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004258944 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_eqgnf
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Whether a person is male or female depends on whether
they feel like a man or a woman.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement below?
Whether a person is male or female depends on whether they feel like a
man or a woman.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
174 |
7.4% |
0.07410562 |
| 2 |
Agree |
391 |
16.7% |
0.16652470 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
273 |
11.6% |
0.11626917 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
497 |
21.2% |
0.21166951 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
259 |
11.0% |
0.11030664 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
346 |
14.7% |
0.14735945 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
377 |
16.1% |
0.16056218 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.3% |
0.01320273 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_fakinx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_fakinx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2345] [Invalid:9170]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
1131 |
48.2% |
0.4823028 |
| 2 |
does not |
1214 |
51.8% |
0.5176972 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9170 |
|
NA |
r31_fakinx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_fakinx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2345] [Invalid:9170]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Your child has some learning difficulties that will very likely affect their
future achievements at school. |
754 |
32.2% |
0.3215352 |
| 2 |
Your child finds learning easy and is interested in letters and numbers. |
805 |
34.3% |
0.3432836 |
| 3 |
BLANK |
786 |
33.5% |
0.3351812 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9170 |
|
NA |
r31_fakinx_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: limited the time my child was in kindergarten
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a situation where:
You have a child who goes to kindergarten. The kindergarten staff
[r31_fakinx_ran1] meet the formal requirements for education among
kindergarten staff. The kindergarten is a bit too far away from
home.
[r31_fakinx_ran2]
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements:
I would have…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…limited the time my child was in kindergarten
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Completely disagree 0 |
422 |
18.0% |
0.17972743 |
| 1 |
1 |
180 |
7.7% |
0.07666099 |
| 2 |
2 |
288 |
12.3% |
0.12265758 |
| 3 |
3 |
276 |
11.8% |
0.11754685 |
| 4 |
4 |
130 |
5.5% |
0.05536627 |
| 5 |
5 |
365 |
15.5% |
0.15545145 |
| 6 |
6 |
121 |
5.2% |
0.05153322 |
| 7 |
7 |
193 |
8.2% |
0.08219761 |
| 8 |
8 |
125 |
5.3% |
0.05323680 |
| 9 |
9 |
43 |
1.8% |
0.01831346 |
| 10 |
Completely agree 10 |
132 |
5.6% |
0.05621806 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
73 |
3.1% |
0.03109029 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_fakinx_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: felt my child was safely looked after in kindergarten
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a situation where:
You have a child who goes to kindergarten. The kindergarten staff
[r31_fakinx_ran1] meet the formal requirements for education among
kindergarten staff. The kindergarten is a bit too far away from
home.
[r31_fakinx_ran2]
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements:
I would have…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…felt my child was safely looked after in kindergarten
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Completely disagree 0 |
44 |
1.9% |
0.01873935 |
| 1 |
1 |
32 |
1.4% |
0.01362862 |
| 2 |
2 |
65 |
2.8% |
0.02768313 |
| 3 |
3 |
114 |
4.9% |
0.04855196 |
| 4 |
4 |
121 |
5.2% |
0.05153322 |
| 5 |
5 |
276 |
11.8% |
0.11754685 |
| 6 |
6 |
192 |
8.2% |
0.08177172 |
| 7 |
7 |
329 |
14.0% |
0.14011925 |
| 8 |
8 |
402 |
17.1% |
0.17120954 |
| 9 |
9 |
266 |
11.3% |
0.11328790 |
| 10 |
Completely agree 10 |
443 |
18.9% |
0.18867121 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
2.7% |
0.02725724 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_fakinx_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: changed my daily life in order to follow up my child
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a situation where:
You have a child who goes to kindergarten. The kindergarten staff
[r31_fakinx_ran1] meet the formal requirements for education among
kindergarten staff. The kindergarten is a bit too far away from
home.
[r31_fakinx_ran2]
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements:
I would have…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… changed my daily life in order to follow up my child
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Completely disagree 0 |
146 |
6.2% |
0.06218058 |
| 1 |
1 |
82 |
3.5% |
0.03492334 |
| 2 |
2 |
141 |
6.0% |
0.06005111 |
| 3 |
3 |
181 |
7.7% |
0.07708688 |
| 4 |
4 |
133 |
5.7% |
0.05664395 |
| 5 |
5 |
382 |
16.3% |
0.16269165 |
| 6 |
6 |
232 |
9.9% |
0.09880750 |
| 7 |
7 |
319 |
13.6% |
0.13586031 |
| 8 |
8 |
299 |
12.7% |
0.12734242 |
| 9 |
9 |
122 |
5.2% |
0.05195911 |
| 10 |
Completely agree 10 |
243 |
10.3% |
0.10349233 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
68 |
2.9% |
0.02896082 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_fakinx_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: tried to switch kindergarten
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a situation where:
You have a child who goes to kindergarten. The kindergarten staff
[r31_fakinx_ran1] meet the formal requirements for education among
kindergarten staff. The kindergarten is a bit too far away from
home.
[r31_fakinx_ran2]
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements:
I would have…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… tried to switch kindergarten
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Completely disagree 0 |
227 |
9.7% |
0.09667802 |
| 1 |
1 |
91 |
3.9% |
0.03875639 |
| 2 |
2 |
132 |
5.6% |
0.05621806 |
| 3 |
3 |
148 |
6.3% |
0.06303237 |
| 4 |
4 |
103 |
4.4% |
0.04386712 |
| 5 |
5 |
389 |
16.6% |
0.16567291 |
| 6 |
6 |
156 |
6.6% |
0.06643952 |
| 7 |
7 |
221 |
9.4% |
0.09412266 |
| 8 |
8 |
246 |
10.5% |
0.10477002 |
| 9 |
9 |
170 |
7.2% |
0.07240204 |
| 10 |
Completely agree 10 |
401 |
17.1% |
0.17078365 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
2.7% |
0.02725724 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_fakoc
|
Variable label:
|
Do you have or have you had children in a Norwegian kindergarten?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have or have you had children in a Norwegian kindergarten?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1544 |
65.8% |
0.65758092 |
| 2 |
No |
778 |
33.1% |
0.33134583 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.1% |
0.01107325 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_fakocy_1
|
Variable label:
|
When did your/your children attend kindergarten: Before 1980
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When did your child/children attend kindergarten?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Before 1980
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_fakoc = 1) & (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
184 |
11.9% |
0.1191709845 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1359 |
88.0% |
0.8801813472 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006476684 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9971 |
|
NA |
r31_fakocy_2
|
Variable label:
|
When did your/your children attend kindergarten: 1980s
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When did your child/children attend kindergarten?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The 80s
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_fakoc = 1) & (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
410 |
26.6% |
0.2655440415 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1133 |
73.4% |
0.7338082902 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006476684 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9971 |
|
NA |
r31_fakocy_3
|
Variable label:
|
When did your/your children attend kindergarten: 1990s
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When did your child/children attend kindergarten?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The 90s
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_fakoc = 1) & (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
520 |
33.7% |
0.3367875648 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1023 |
66.3% |
0.6625647668 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006476684 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9971 |
|
NA |
r31_fakocy_4
|
Variable label:
|
When did your/your children attend kindergarten: 2000s
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When did your child/children attend kindergarten?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The 2000s
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_fakoc = 1) & (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
464 |
30.1% |
0.3005181347 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1079 |
69.9% |
0.6988341969 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006476684 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9971 |
|
NA |
r31_fakocy_5
|
Variable label:
|
When did your/your children attend kindergarten: 2010s
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When did your child/children attend kindergarten?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The 2010s
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_fakoc = 1) & (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
348 |
22.5% |
0.2253886010 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1195 |
77.4% |
0.7739637306 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006476684 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9971 |
|
NA |
r31_fakocy_6
|
Variable label:
|
When did your/your children attend kindergarten: 2020s
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When did your child/children attend kindergarten?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The 2020s
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_fakoc = 1) & (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
179 |
11.6% |
0.1159326425 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
1364 |
88.3% |
0.8834196891 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006476684 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9971 |
|
NA |
r31_fakoce
|
Variable label:
|
Do you know what education the kindergarten staff have/had?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you know what education the kindergarten staff have/had?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_fakoc = 1) & (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I know about the education of some of them |
856 |
55.4% |
0.554404145 |
| 2 |
Yes, I know the education of all of them |
255 |
16.5% |
0.165155440 |
| 3 |
No, I don't know what education they had |
431 |
27.9% |
0.279145078 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001295337 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9971 |
|
NA |
r31_fakes
|
Variable label:
|
What percentage of kindergarten staff do you think should have
kindergarten/preschool teacher training or the equivalent?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What percentage of kindergarten staff do you think should have
kindergarten/preschool teacher training or the equivalent?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
[The respondent answered using a slider.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2298] [Invalid:9217]
[Range:0-100]
|
r31_fakqu_1
|
Variable label:
|
What qualifications and qualities do you think are most important for
those working with children in kindergartens: Caregiving ability
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What qualifications and qualities do you think are most important for
those working with children in kindergartens?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Caregiving ability
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate the following alternatives on a scale of 1 to 4 by clicking
on them in order, where 1 is the most important and 4 is the least
important:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ranked care provision ability as number 1 |
1425 |
60.7% |
0.60689949 |
| 2 |
Ranked care provision ability as number 2 |
615 |
26.2% |
0.26192504 |
| 3 |
Ranked care provision ability as number 3 |
180 |
7.7% |
0.07666099 |
| 4 |
Ranked care provision ability as number 4 |
40 |
1.7% |
0.01703578 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
88 |
3.7% |
0.03747871 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_fakqu_2
|
Variable label:
|
What qualifications and qualities do you think are most important for
those working with children in kindergartens: Education (kindergarten
teacher/preschool teacher)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What qualifications and qualities do you think are most important for
those working with children in kindergartens?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Education (kindergarten teacher/preschool teacher)
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate the following alternatives on a scale of 1 to 4 by clicking
on them in order, where 1 is the most important and 4 is the least
important:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ranked education (kindergarten teacher/preschool teacher) as number 1 |
643 |
27.4% |
0.2738501 |
| 2 |
Ranked education (kindergarten teacher/preschool teacher) as number 2 |
731 |
31.1% |
0.3113288 |
| 3 |
Ranked education (kindergarten teacher/preschool teacher) as number 3 |
488 |
20.8% |
0.2078365 |
| 4 |
Ranked education (kindergarten teacher/preschool teacher) as number 4 |
308 |
13.1% |
0.1311755 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
178 |
7.6% |
0.0758092 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_fakqu_3
|
Variable label:
|
What qualifications and qualities do you think are most important for
those working with children in kindergartens: Experience
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What qualifications and qualities do you think are most important for
those working with children in kindergartens?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Experience
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate the following alternatives on a scale of 1 to 4 by clicking
on them in order, where 1 is the most important and 4 is the least
important:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ranked experience as number 1 |
175 |
7.5% |
0.07453152 |
| 2 |
Ranked experience as number 2 |
541 |
23.0% |
0.23040886 |
| 3 |
Ranked experience as number 3 |
832 |
35.4% |
0.35434412 |
| 4 |
Ranked experience as number 4 |
587 |
25.0% |
0.25000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
213 |
9.1% |
0.09071550 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_fakqu_4
|
Variable label:
|
What qualifications and qualities do you think are most important for
those working with children in kindergartens: Structure/order
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What qualifications and qualities do you think are most important for
those working with children in kindergartens?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Structure/order
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate the following alternatives on a scale of 1 to 4 by clicking
on them in order, where 1 is the most important and 4 is the least
important:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ranked structure/order as number 1 |
78 |
3.3% |
0.03321976 |
| 2 |
Ranked structure/order as number 2 |
303 |
12.9% |
0.12904600 |
| 3 |
Ranked structure/order as number 3 |
609 |
25.9% |
0.25936968 |
| 4 |
Ranked structure/order as number 4 |
1089 |
46.4% |
0.46379898 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
269 |
11.5% |
0.11456559 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_dmaik
|
Variable label:
|
How much would you say you know about machine learning and artificial
intelligence?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Machine learning is often referred to as artificial intelligence.
Using machine learning involves getting computers to learn how to solve
tasks based on data. Computers can often become extremely accurate,
although this typically requires a lot of data. Today, machine learning
provides the basis for a wide range of services and products, such as
search engines, product recommendations, voice recognition, driverless
cars, chatGPT and much more.
Generally speaking, how much would you say you know about machine
learning and artificial intelligence?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A great deal |
94 |
4.0% |
0.040034072 |
| 2 |
A lot |
362 |
15.4% |
0.154173765 |
| 3 |
A bit |
952 |
40.5% |
0.405451448 |
| 4 |
Not much |
710 |
30.2% |
0.302385009 |
| 5 |
Nothing at all |
209 |
8.9% |
0.089011925 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.9% |
0.008943782 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_dmaip
|
Variable label:
|
Improvement/deterioration of public services: Norwegian authorities’ use
of machine learning and artificial intelligence to automate certain
tasks and to provide information for decisions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In some cases, public administration uses machine learning. Machine
learning can be used to fully automate certain tasks and to provide
decision makers with information or suggestions. Based on what you know,
do you think the Norwegian authorities’ use of machine learning and
artificial intelligence will lead to an improvement or a deterioration
of public services?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Great improvement |
69 |
2.9% |
0.029386712 |
| 2 |
Improvement |
560 |
23.9% |
0.238500852 |
| 3 |
Some improvement |
845 |
36.0% |
0.359880750 |
| 4 |
Neither improvement nor deterioration |
288 |
12.3% |
0.122657581 |
| 5 |
Some deterioration |
231 |
9.8% |
0.098381601 |
| 6 |
Deterioration |
111 |
4.7% |
0.047274276 |
| 7 |
Great deterioration |
24 |
1.0% |
0.010221465 |
| 8 |
Don't know |
197 |
8.4% |
0.083901193 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.0% |
0.009795571 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_dmaiw
|
Variable label:
|
How worried are you about the use of machine learning and artificial
intelligence in public administration?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the future, public administration may use artificial intelligence to
help make decisions on certain issues. The aim is to reduce costs and
processing time, and to make decisions better and more accurate. One
example might be to teach a computer to predict approximately how long a
person will be on sick leave based on information about the illness and
the person. A case officer can then use this to choose appropriate
measures. Other examples include using artificial intelligence to settle
refugees in municipalities, and to assess whether prison inmates should
be granted parole or not.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How worried –or not––are you about the use of machine learning and
artificial intelligence in public administration?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very worried |
121 |
5.2% |
0.05153322 |
| 2 |
Worried |
371 |
15.8% |
0.15800681 |
| 3 |
Somewhat worried |
930 |
39.6% |
0.39608177 |
| 4 |
Not very worried |
813 |
34.6% |
0.34625213 |
| 5 |
Not at all worried |
83 |
3.5% |
0.03534923 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01277683 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_plpsm
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: I am very motivated to contribute to society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement?
I am very motivated to contribute to society.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
890 |
37.9% |
0.379045997 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
1013 |
43.1% |
0.431431005 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
320 |
13.6% |
0.136286201 |
| 4 |
Disagree somewhat |
81 |
3.4% |
0.034497445 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
20 |
0.9% |
0.008517888 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.0% |
0.010221465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_plpsc
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: I find it very motivating to actively contribute to
society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement?
I find it very motivating to actively contribute to society.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
718 |
30.6% |
0.305792164 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
1037 |
44.2% |
0.441652470 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
398 |
17.0% |
0.169505963 |
| 4 |
Disagree somewhat |
118 |
5.0% |
0.050255537 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
23 |
1.0% |
0.009795571 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
2.3% |
0.022998296 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_plpsd
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Making a difference in society, no matter how small, is
very important to me.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement?
Making a difference in society, no matter how small, is very important
to me.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
748 |
31.9% |
0.31856899 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
978 |
41.7% |
0.41652470 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
412 |
17.5% |
0.17546848 |
| 4 |
Disagree somewhat |
121 |
5.2% |
0.05153322 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
41 |
1.7% |
0.01746167 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
2.0% |
0.02044293 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_plpsi
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Protecting the interests of the community is very
important to me.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement?
Protecting the interests of the community is very important to me.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
1099 |
46.8% |
0.468057922 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
905 |
38.5% |
0.385434412 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
232 |
9.9% |
0.098807496 |
| 4 |
Disagree somewhat |
51 |
2.2% |
0.021720613 |
| 5 |
Completely disagree |
14 |
0.6% |
0.005962521 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
47 |
2.0% |
0.020017036 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_inruw
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Norway has no moral obligation to support Ukraine in its
fight against Russia.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement?
Norway has no moral obligation to support Ukraine in its fight against
Russia.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
74 |
3.2% |
0.031516184 |
| 2 |
Agree |
97 |
4.1% |
0.041311755 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
155 |
6.6% |
0.066013629 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
150 |
6.4% |
0.063884157 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
348 |
14.8% |
0.148211244 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
774 |
33.0% |
0.329642249 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
727 |
31.0% |
0.309625213 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.0% |
0.009795571 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_tcdho
|
Variable label:
|
Have you ever ordered a package and had it delivered to your home?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you ever ordered a package and had it delivered to your home?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent lives in a municipality with 10 000 inhabitants
or more (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1896 |
91.5% |
0.914616498 |
| 2 |
No |
140 |
6.8% |
0.067534973 |
| 3 |
No, but I plan to do so in the near future |
12 |
0.6% |
0.005788712 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.2% |
0.012059817 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9442 |
|
NA |
r31_tcdpr
|
Variable label:
|
Which package delivery alternative would you choose?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you are going to choose delivery for a package you
order. Which of the delivery options below would you choose?
Alternative 1: Price: Free of charge, Delivery time: 5 working days,
Place of delivery: Post-in-store
Alternative 2 Price: NOK 49, Delivery time: 2 working days, Place of
delivery: Parcel locker
Alternative 3: Price: NOK 99, Delivery time: 2 working days, Place of
delivery: Delivered to your door
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) & (r31_tcdho = 1,3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Alternative 1 |
1556 |
81.6% |
0.815513627 |
| 2 |
Alternative 2 |
239 |
12.5% |
0.125262055 |
| 3 |
Alternative 3 |
107 |
5.6% |
0.056079665 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003144654 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9607 |
|
NA |
r31_tcdim_1
|
Variable label:
|
Most important when ordering a package to be delivered to your home:
Freight costs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What do you consider most important when ordering a package to your
home?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Freight costs
|
|
Post-question:
|
Rank the alternatives below from most important to least important
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) & (r31_tcdho = 1,3)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ranked freight costs as number 1 |
1189 |
62.3% |
0.6231656 |
| 2 |
Ranked freight costs as number 2 |
354 |
18.6% |
0.1855346 |
| 3 |
Ranked freight costs as number 3 |
210 |
11.0% |
0.1100629 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
155 |
8.1% |
0.0812369 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9607 |
|
NA |
r31_tcdim_2
|
Variable label:
|
Most important when ordering a package to be delivered to your home:
Delivery time
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What do you consider most important when ordering a package to your
home?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Delivery time
|
|
Post-question:
|
Rank the alternatives below from most important to least important
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) & (r31_tcdho = 1,3)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ranked delivery time as number 1 |
282 |
14.8% |
0.1477987 |
| 2 |
Ranked delivery time as number 2 |
618 |
32.4% |
0.3238994 |
| 3 |
Ranked delivery time as number 3 |
734 |
38.5% |
0.3846960 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
274 |
14.4% |
0.1436059 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9607 |
|
NA |
r31_tcdim_3
|
Variable label:
|
Most important when ordering a package to be delivered to your home:
Place of delivery
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What do you consider most important when ordering a package to your
home?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Place of delivery
|
|
Post-question:
|
Rank the alternatives below from most important to least important
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) & (r31_tcdho = 1,3)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ranked place of delivery as number 1 |
422 |
22.1% |
0.2211740 |
| 2 |
Ranked place of delivery as number 2 |
637 |
33.4% |
0.3338574 |
| 3 |
Ranked place of delivery as number 3 |
629 |
33.0% |
0.3296646 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
220 |
11.5% |
0.1153040 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9607 |
|
NA |
r31_tcrfp_1
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/Negative: Measures to limit the consequences of increased
freight: Freight costs should always cover what it actually costs to
deliver something, so the sender can’t offer ‘free’ shipping
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Home delivery of parcels and new delivery services have increased the
transport of goods in Norway. As mentioned, this can have consequences
such as increased traffic, energy consumption and emissions, as well as
more demanding prioritisation of space.
If one tried to limit the consequences of increased freight, what type
of measures would you be positive or negative about?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Freight costs should always cover what it actually costs to deliver
something, so the sender can’t offer ‘free’ shipping
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent lives in a municipality
with 10 000 inhabitants or more]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
344 |
16.6% |
0.16594308 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positive |
567 |
27.4% |
0.27351664 |
| 3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
572 |
27.6% |
0.27592861 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negative |
344 |
16.6% |
0.16594308 |
| 5 |
Very negative |
199 |
9.6% |
0.09599614 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
47 |
2.3% |
0.02267246 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9442 |
|
NA |
r31_tcrfp_2
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/Negative: Measures to limit the consequences of increased
freight: Requirements for vans to be filled up to a minimum threshold,
which could lead to increased delivery times
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Home delivery of parcels and new delivery services have increased the
transport of goods in Norway. As mentioned, this can have consequences
such as increased traffic, energy consumption and emissions, as well as
more demanding prioritisation of space.
If one tried to limit the consequences of increased freight, what type
of measures would you be positive or negative about?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Requirements for vans to be filled up to a minimum threshold, which
could lead to increased delivery times
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent lives in a municipality
with 10 000 inhabitants or more]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
515 |
24.8% |
0.24843222 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positive |
855 |
41.2% |
0.41244573 |
| 3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
363 |
17.5% |
0.17510854 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negative |
214 |
10.3% |
0.10323203 |
| 5 |
Very negative |
80 |
3.9% |
0.03859141 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
2.2% |
0.02219006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9442 |
|
NA |
r31_tcrfp_3
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/Negative: Measures to limit the consequences of increased
freight: Increased use of pick-up points instead of home delivery
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Home delivery of parcels and new delivery services have increased the
transport of goods in Norway. As mentioned, this can have consequences
such as increased traffic, energy consumption and emissions, as well as
more demanding prioritisation of space.
If one tried to limit the consequences of increased freight, what type
of measures would you be positive or negative about?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increased use of pick-up points instead of home delivery
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent lives in a municipality
with 10 000 inhabitants or more]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
893 |
43.1% |
0.43077665 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positive |
682 |
32.9% |
0.32899180 |
| 3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
269 |
13.0% |
0.12976363 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negative |
131 |
6.3% |
0.06319344 |
| 5 |
Very negative |
55 |
2.7% |
0.02653160 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
2.1% |
0.02074288 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9442 |
|
NA |
r31_tcrfm_1
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative to measures limiting the consequences of increased
freight: The state must set rules against ‘running empty’ – vehicles
that do not have a full load
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If we want to limit the consequences of increased freight, measures can
be introduced. How positive or negative would you be to the proposals
below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The state must set rules against ‘running empty’ – vehicles that do not
have a full load
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent lives in a
municipality with 10 000 inhabitants or more]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
418 |
20.2% |
0.20164014 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positive |
690 |
33.3% |
0.33285094 |
| 3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
423 |
20.4% |
0.20405210 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negative |
290 |
14.0% |
0.13989387 |
| 5 |
Very negative |
201 |
9.7% |
0.09696093 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
2.5% |
0.02460203 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9442 |
|
NA |
r31_tcrfm_2
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative to measures limiting the consequences of increased
freight: The municipality must provide shared freight terminals in
central areas instead of having scattered terminals that take up a lot
of space
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If we want to limit the consequences of increased freight, measures can
be introduced. How positive or negative would you be to the proposals
below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The municipality must provide shared freight terminals in central areas
instead of having scattered terminals that take up a lot of space
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent lives in a
municipality with 10 000 inhabitants or more]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
362 |
17.5% |
0.17462615 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positive |
699 |
33.7% |
0.33719247 |
| 3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
640 |
30.9% |
0.30873131 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negative |
216 |
10.4% |
0.10419682 |
| 5 |
Very negative |
105 |
5.1% |
0.05065123 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
2.5% |
0.02460203 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9442 |
|
NA |
r31_tcrfm_3
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative to measures limiting the consequences of increased
freight: Companies must stop offering free shipping
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If we want to limit the consequences of increased freight, measures can
be introduced. How positive or negative would you be to the proposals
below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Companies must stop offering free shipping
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent lives in a
municipality with 10 000 inhabitants or more]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
259 |
12.5% |
0.12493970 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positive |
434 |
20.9% |
0.20935842 |
| 3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
555 |
26.8% |
0.26772793 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negative |
456 |
22.0% |
0.21997106 |
| 5 |
Very negative |
317 |
15.3% |
0.15291848 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
2.5% |
0.02508442 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9442 |
|
NA |
r31_tcrfm_4
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative to measures limiting the consequences of increased
freight: Companies need to collaborate on deliveries so they don’t have
to drive as much
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If we want to limit the consequences of increased freight, measures can
be introduced. How positive or negative would you be to the proposals
below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Companies need to collaborate on deliveries so they don’t have to drive
as much
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent lives in a
municipality with 10 000 inhabitants or more]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
820 |
39.6% |
0.39556199 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positive |
772 |
37.2% |
0.37240714 |
| 3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
307 |
14.8% |
0.14809455 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negative |
74 |
3.6% |
0.03569706 |
| 5 |
Very negative |
54 |
2.6% |
0.02604920 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
2.2% |
0.02219006 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9442 |
|
NA |
r31_tcrfm_5
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative to measures limiting the consequences of increased
freight: People must order less and shop in physical stores instead
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If we want to limit the consequences of increased freight, measures can
be introduced. How positive or negative would you be to the proposals
below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
People must order less and shop in physical stores instead
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent lives in a
municipality with 10 000 inhabitants or more]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
581 |
28.0% |
0.28027014 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positive |
595 |
28.7% |
0.28702364 |
| 3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
431 |
20.8% |
0.20791124 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negative |
284 |
13.7% |
0.13699952 |
| 5 |
Very negative |
134 |
6.5% |
0.06464062 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
2.3% |
0.02315485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9442 |
|
NA |
r31_tcrfm_6
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative to measures limiting the consequences of increased
freight: People mustn’t buy as many things
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If we want to limit the consequences of increased freight, measures can
be introduced. How positive or negative would you be to the proposals
below?
|
|
Literal question:
|
People mustn’t buy as many things
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent lives in a
municipality with 10 000 inhabitants or more]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
849 |
41.0% |
0.40955137 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positive |
590 |
28.5% |
0.28461167 |
| 3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
355 |
17.1% |
0.17124940 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negative |
115 |
5.5% |
0.05547516 |
| 5 |
Very negative |
115 |
5.5% |
0.05547516 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
49 |
2.4% |
0.02363724 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9442 |
|
NA |
r31_tctpr
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent is traffic a problem in your area?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent is traffic a problem in the area where you live? By
‘traffic’ we mean motorised vehicles, such as cars, buses, lorries and
the like.
|
|
Post-question:
|
By “traffic” think of motorised vehicles such as cars, busses, trucks
and similar.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) and if the respondent lives in a municipality
with 10 000 inhabitants or more]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
104 |
5.0% |
0.05016884 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
256 |
12.3% |
0.12349252 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
647 |
31.2% |
0.31210806 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
765 |
36.9% |
0.36903039 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
262 |
12.6% |
0.12638688 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
39 |
1.9% |
0.01881331 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9442 |
|
NA |
r31_meicox_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r31_meicox_1].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2319] [Invalid:9196]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
788 |
34.0% |
0.3398016 |
| 2 |
During their cooperation the woman has been accused of creating content on her
own channels that contributes towards body image pressure. |
766 |
33.0% |
0.3303148 |
| 3 |
During their collaboration, the woman has made hateful and racist statements at
a nightclub. |
765 |
33.0% |
0.3298836 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9196 |
|
NA |
r31_meicox_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r31_meicox_1].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2319] [Invalid:9196]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
1134 |
48.9% |
0.4890039 |
| 2 |
VG is now wanting to end its collaboration with the woman. |
1185 |
51.1% |
0.5109961 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9196 |
|
NA |
r31_meicox_1
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of trust: Information published by VG after reading about their
cooperation with a female influencer
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that the newspaper VG has previously entered into cooperation
with a 24-year-old woman who is known for sharing content on social
media. She has a lot of young followers who follow her daily and
occasionally she shares content that creates reactions. As a result of
her cooperation with VG she is the host of VGTV.
[r31_meicox_ran1]
[r31_meicox_ran2]
To what extent do you have confidence in the information published by VG
after having read about their cooperation with this woman?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
[Displayed on the same page with [r31_meicox_2]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very high confidence |
23 |
1.0% |
0.009795571 |
| 2 |
High confidence |
236 |
10.1% |
0.100511073 |
| 3 |
Some confidence |
718 |
30.6% |
0.305792164 |
| 4 |
Low confidence |
1015 |
43.2% |
0.432282794 |
| 5 |
No confidence at all |
297 |
12.6% |
0.126490630 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
2.5% |
0.025127768 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_meicox_2
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative: Impression of VG after reading about their
cooperation with the woman?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the newspaper VG has previously entered into cooperation
with a 24-year-old woman who is known for sharing content on social
media. She has a lot of young followers who watch her daily and
occasionally she shares content that creates reactions. As a result of
her cooperation with VG she is the host of VGTV.
[r31_meicox_ran1]
[r31_meicox_ran2]
To what extent do you have confidence in the information published in VG
after having read about their cooperation with this woman?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative is your impression of VG after reading about
their cooperation with this woman?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1)]
[Displayed on the same page with [r31_meicox_1]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
7 |
0.3% |
0.002981261 |
| 2 |
Positively |
102 |
4.3% |
0.043441227 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positively |
136 |
5.8% |
0.057921635 |
| 4 |
Neither positively nor negatively |
597 |
25.4% |
0.254258944 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negatively |
700 |
29.8% |
0.298126065 |
| 6 |
Negatively |
547 |
23.3% |
0.232964225 |
| 7 |
Very negatively |
202 |
8.6% |
0.086030664 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
2.4% |
0.024275980 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9167 |
|
NA |
r31_pohpqx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_pohpqx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2337] [Invalid:9178]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Anna Pedersen is 40 years old, is a qualified nurse and has worked for 8 years
in the health sector. She has recently become a party member, but has not
previously held political office. |
438 |
18.7% |
0.1874198 |
| 2 |
Anna Pedersen is 40 years old, is a qualified doctor and has worked for 8
years in the health sector. She has recently become a party member, but has not
previously held political office. |
508 |
21.7% |
0.2173727 |
| 3 |
Anna Pedersen is 40 years old. After secondary school she worked for a
kindergarten. She has always been politically active and has been the mayor of
her home municipality for the past 8 years. |
463 |
19.8% |
0.1981172 |
| 4 |
Anna Pedersen is 40 years old. After secondary school she worked for a
kindergarten. She has always been politically active and has been a political
adviser at the party office in Oslo for the last 8 years. |
456 |
19.5% |
0.1951220 |
| 5 |
Anna Pedersen is 40 years old, is a qualified nurse and has worked for 8 years
in the health sector. She has always been politically active and has been the
mayor of her home municipality for the past 8 years. |
472 |
20.2% |
0.2019683 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_pohpqx_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think Anna Pedersen is suitable as: Parliamentary
politician on the Standing Committee on Health and Care Services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a fictional person who is relevant for several political
positions.
[r31_pohpqx_ran]
To what extent do you think Anna Pedersen would be suitable as:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Parliamentary politician on the Standing Committee on Health and Care
Services
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very low degree |
114 |
4.9% |
0.04878049 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
246 |
10.5% |
0.10526316 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
765 |
32.7% |
0.32734275 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
864 |
37.0% |
0.36970475 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
294 |
12.6% |
0.12580231 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
2.3% |
0.02310655 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_pohpqx_2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think Anna Pedersen is suitable as: Minister of
Health and Care Services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a fictional person who is relevant for several political
positions.
[r31_pohpqx_ran]
To what extent do you think Anna Pedersen would be suitable as:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Minister of Health and Care Services
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very low degree |
353 |
15.1% |
0.15104835 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
597 |
25.5% |
0.25545571 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
765 |
32.7% |
0.32734275 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
419 |
17.9% |
0.17928969 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
131 |
5.6% |
0.05605477 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
3.1% |
0.03080873 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_pohpqx_3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think Anna Pedersen is suitable as: Political
Adviser in the Ministry of Health and Care Services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a fictional person who is relevant for several political
positions.
[r31_pohpqx_ran]
To what extent do you think Anna Pedersen would be suitable as:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political Adviser in the Ministry of Health and Care Services
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very low degree |
165 |
7.1% |
0.07060334 |
| 2 |
A low degree |
343 |
14.7% |
0.14676936 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
804 |
34.4% |
0.34403081 |
| 4 |
A high degree |
697 |
29.8% |
0.29824561 |
| 5 |
A very high degree |
288 |
12.3% |
0.12323492 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
1.7% |
0.01711596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_pohpqx_back
|
Variable label:
|
Whether the respondent has navigated back to [r31_pohpqx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:174] [Invalid:11341]
[Range:1-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The respondent has navigated back to [r31_pohpqx] |
174 |
100.0% |
1 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11341 |
|
NA |
r31_pohpqxc
|
Variable label:
|
Do you remember where Anna Pedersen had work experience from?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you remember where Anna Pedersen had work experience from?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
f6_pohpqxc, p11_pohpqxc
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The health sector |
1417 |
60.6% |
0.606332905 |
| 2 |
Kindergarten |
902 |
38.6% |
0.385964912 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007702182 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cefee2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings regarding climate change: Hope
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hope
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
118 |
5.0% |
0.05049208 |
| 2 |
Not much |
612 |
26.2% |
0.26187420 |
| 3 |
Some |
1164 |
49.8% |
0.49807445 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
365 |
15.6% |
0.15618314 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
54 |
2.3% |
0.02310655 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.0% |
0.01026958 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cefee2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings regarding climate change: Fear
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
227 |
9.7% |
0.09713308 |
| 2 |
Not much |
572 |
24.5% |
0.24475824 |
| 3 |
Some |
1058 |
45.3% |
0.45271716 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
367 |
15.7% |
0.15703894 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
86 |
3.7% |
0.03679932 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.2% |
0.01155327 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cefee2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings regarding climate change: Sadness
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sadness
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
249 |
10.7% |
0.10654685 |
| 2 |
Not much |
404 |
17.3% |
0.17287120 |
| 3 |
Some |
892 |
38.2% |
0.38168592 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
597 |
25.5% |
0.25545571 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
167 |
7.1% |
0.07145914 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.01198117 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cefee2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings regarding climate change: Anger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
382 |
16.3% |
0.16345742 |
| 2 |
Not much |
681 |
29.1% |
0.29139923 |
| 3 |
Some |
850 |
36.4% |
0.36371416 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
297 |
12.7% |
0.12708601 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
95 |
4.1% |
0.04065041 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.4% |
0.01369277 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cefee2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings regarding climate change: Guilt
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Guilt
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
463 |
19.8% |
0.198117244 |
| 2 |
Not much |
843 |
36.1% |
0.360718870 |
| 3 |
Some |
850 |
36.4% |
0.363714163 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
131 |
5.6% |
0.056054771 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007702182 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.4% |
0.013692769 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cefee2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Your feelings regarding climate change: Powerlessness
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
With regard to climate change and everything you associate with it, how
strongly do you experience the following emotions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Powerlessness
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
224 |
9.6% |
0.09584938 |
| 2 |
Not much |
340 |
14.5% |
0.14548567 |
| 3 |
Some |
786 |
33.6% |
0.33632863 |
| 4 |
Strongly |
647 |
27.7% |
0.27685066 |
| 5 |
Very strongly |
314 |
13.4% |
0.13436029 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.1% |
0.01112537 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cefeeo_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_cefeeo]
based on answers given in [r31_cefee2].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2325] [Invalid:9190]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hope |
405 |
17.4% |
0.1741935 |
| 2 |
Fear |
410 |
17.6% |
0.1763441 |
| 3 |
Sadness |
391 |
16.8% |
0.1681720 |
| 4 |
Anger |
357 |
15.4% |
0.1535484 |
| 5 |
Guilt |
374 |
16.1% |
0.1608602 |
| 6 |
Powerlessness |
388 |
16.7% |
0.1668817 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9190 |
|
NA |
r31_cefeeo_pipe_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_cefeeo]
based on answers in [r31_cefee2] and value from [r31_cefeeo_ran].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:2325]
[Invalid:9190] [Range:-]
|
r31_cefeeo
|
Variable label:
|
When you answered how much [r31_cefeeo_ran] you feel, what did you think
of?
|
|
Literal question:
|
You have just said how strongly, if at all, you experience different
feelings when you think about climate change. Now we want to know more
about one of these feelings: [r31_cefeeo_ran]. When you answered how
much [r31_cefeeo_ran] you felt, what were you thinking about?
Please write down your thoughts and assessments about why you answered
that [r31_cefeeo_pipe_1] when you think about climate change.
|
|
Post-question:
|
All types of responses are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or
just a few words if you prefer.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if at least one of [r31_cefee2_1] - [r31_cefee2_6] is answered
and (r31_group = 2)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_cemor
|
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you regard it as a moral duty for individuals to
contribute towards preventing climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what degree do you regard it as a moral duty for individuals to
contribute towards preventing climate change?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
422 |
18.1% |
0.18057338 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
974 |
41.7% |
0.41677364 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
649 |
27.8% |
0.27770646 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
193 |
8.3% |
0.08258451 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
68 |
2.9% |
0.02909713 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.3% |
0.01326487 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cepre
|
Variable label:
|
Whether it is possible to do something to prevent harmful climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s assume that climate change could become a major threat to the
world in the future if no action is taken. To what extent do you believe
it is possible to do something to prevent harmful climate change?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
There is nothing we can do to prevent harmful climate change |
211 |
9.0% |
0.090286692 |
| 2 |
It is possible, but very difficult to do something to prevent harmful climate
change |
1462 |
62.6% |
0.625588361 |
| 3 |
It is possible and completely realistic to do something to prevent harmful
climate change |
523 |
22.4% |
0.223791185 |
| 4 |
It is easy to prevent harmful climate change |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005134788 |
| 5 |
I do not consider climate change to be a problem |
93 |
4.0% |
0.039794608 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
1.5% |
0.015404365 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cetec
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Technological innovations will solve climate problems.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the statement below. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following? Technological innovations will solve climate
problems.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
69 |
3.0% |
0.02952503 |
| 2 |
Agree |
250 |
10.7% |
0.10697475 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
933 |
39.9% |
0.39922978 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
526 |
22.5% |
0.22507488 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
211 |
9.0% |
0.09028669 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
232 |
9.9% |
0.09927257 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
86 |
3.7% |
0.03679932 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01283697 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_poabo
|
Variable label:
|
Where do you think the line should be drawn in respect of when it should
be legal to have a self-determined abortion in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
On 23 August 2024 the government published a draft of a new Abortion
Act, designed to extend the rights of women to self-determined abortion
from week 12 to week 18. There will be a vote in the Storting about this
draft on new Abortion Act.
Where do you think the line should be drawn in respect of when it should
be legal to have a self-determined abortion in Norway?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
More than 22 weeks |
87 |
3.7% |
0.03722721 |
| 2 |
22 weeks |
106 |
4.5% |
0.04535730 |
| 3 |
18 weeks (as in the draft) |
990 |
42.4% |
0.42362003 |
| 4 |
12 weeks (as at present) |
781 |
33.4% |
0.33418913 |
| 5 |
Less than 12 weeks |
52 |
2.2% |
0.02225075 |
| 6 |
Abortion should not be allowed at all |
54 |
2.3% |
0.02310655 |
| 7 |
Not sure |
237 |
10.1% |
0.10141207 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01283697 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_povof
|
Variable label:
|
Should the parties allow their representatives to vote freely about the
new Abortion Act?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The parties in the Storting can allow their representatives to vote
as they wish on draft legislation that concerns matters of conscience.
Amending the Abortion Act may be one such matter.
Should the parties allow their representatives to vote freely about the
new Abortion Act?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1451 |
62.1% |
0.62088147 |
| 2 |
No |
359 |
15.4% |
0.15361575 |
| 3 |
Not sure |
494 |
21.1% |
0.21138211 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.4% |
0.01412067 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_poval
|
Variable label:
|
What do you think parliamentary politicians should pay the most
attention to when voting on the draft to change the Abortion Act?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think parliamentary politicians should pay the most
attention to when voting on the draft to change the Abortion Act?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Own opinion |
1071 |
45.8% |
0.45827985 |
| 2 |
Party and the party’s position |
584 |
25.0% |
0.24989303 |
| 3 |
The party’s electoral group |
623 |
26.7% |
0.26658109 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
2.5% |
0.02524604 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_pleat_1
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you eat fish and fish products?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you eat fish and fish products?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never |
33 |
1.4% |
0.014120668 |
| 2 |
Less than once a month |
89 |
3.8% |
0.038083012 |
| 3 |
At least once a month |
359 |
15.4% |
0.153615747 |
| 4 |
At least once a week |
985 |
42.1% |
0.421480531 |
| 5 |
Several times a week |
824 |
35.3% |
0.352588789 |
| 6 |
Every day |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007702182 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.2% |
0.012409071 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_pleat_2
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you eat meat and meat products?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you eat meat and meat products?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never |
33 |
1.4% |
0.01412067 |
| 2 |
Less than once a month |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01283697 |
| 3 |
At least once a month |
110 |
4.7% |
0.04706889 |
| 4 |
At least once a week |
636 |
27.2% |
0.27214377 |
| 5 |
Several times a week |
1350 |
57.8% |
0.57766367 |
| 6 |
Every day |
114 |
4.9% |
0.04878049 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
2.7% |
0.02738554 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_pleah
|
Variable label:
|
Do any of the following alternatives describe your eating habits?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do any of the following alternatives describe your eating habits?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am vegan or vegetarian |
21 |
0.9% |
0.008985879 |
| 2 |
I eat, fish but not meat (pescetarian) |
39 |
1.7% |
0.016688062 |
| 4 |
None of the above alternatives describe my eating habits |
2242 |
95.9% |
0.959349593 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.5% |
0.014976466 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_plear
|
Variable label:
|
Do you have a religion that affects what you eat?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have a religion that affects what you eat?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
21 |
0.9% |
0.008985879 |
| 2 |
No |
2278 |
97.5% |
0.974753958 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
38 |
1.6% |
0.016260163 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cesfa
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative are you towards salmon farming?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Most of the salmon sold in Norway is produced by fish farms.
How positive or negative are you about salmon farming?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
114 |
4.9% |
0.04878049 |
| 2 |
Positive |
444 |
19.0% |
0.18998716 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
380 |
16.3% |
0.16260163 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
372 |
15.9% |
0.15917843 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
482 |
20.6% |
0.20624733 |
| 6 |
Negative |
264 |
11.3% |
0.11296534 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
249 |
10.7% |
0.10654685 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.4% |
0.01369277 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cesfi_1
|
Variable label:
|
Important for attitude towards salmon farming: Impact on nature
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the factors below for your attitude towards salmon
farming?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Impact on nature
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
1045 |
44.7% |
0.447154472 |
| 2 |
Important |
849 |
36.3% |
0.363286264 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
307 |
13.1% |
0.131364998 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
51 |
2.2% |
0.021822850 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
23 |
1.0% |
0.009841677 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
62 |
2.7% |
0.026529739 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cesfi_2
|
Variable label:
|
Important for attitude towards salmon farming: Fish welfare
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the factors below for your attitude towards salmon
farming?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The welfare of the fish
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
897 |
38.4% |
0.383825417 |
| 2 |
Important |
959 |
41.0% |
0.410355156 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
339 |
14.5% |
0.145057766 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
66 |
2.8% |
0.028241335 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
23 |
1.0% |
0.009841677 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
53 |
2.3% |
0.022678648 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cesfi_3
|
Variable label:
|
Important for attitude towards salmon farming: Contribution to local
economy and jobs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the factors below for your attitude towards salmon
farming?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Contribution to the local economy and jobs
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
423 |
18.1% |
0.18100128 |
| 2 |
Important |
909 |
38.9% |
0.38896021 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
601 |
25.7% |
0.25716731 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
261 |
11.2% |
0.11168164 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
84 |
3.6% |
0.03594352 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
2.5% |
0.02524604 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cesfi_4
|
Variable label:
|
Important for attitude towards salmon farming: Content of the feed that
salmon eat
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the factors below for your attitude towards salmon
farming?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Contents of the feed that salmon eat
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
859 |
36.8% |
0.36756525 |
| 2 |
Important |
925 |
39.6% |
0.39580659 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
344 |
14.7% |
0.14719726 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
107 |
4.6% |
0.04578519 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
42 |
1.8% |
0.01797176 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
2.6% |
0.02567394 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cesfi_5
|
Variable label:
|
Important for attitude towards salmon farming: The impact of the
aquaculture industry on the climate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are the factors below for your attitude towards salmon
farming?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The impact of the fish farming industry on the climate
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
645 |
27.6% |
0.27599487 |
| 2 |
Important |
838 |
35.9% |
0.35857938 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
486 |
20.8% |
0.20795892 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
215 |
9.2% |
0.09199829 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
94 |
4.0% |
0.04022251 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
2.5% |
0.02524604 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_cesfhx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects when the respondent is exposed to
[r31_cesfhx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2304] [Invalid:9211]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Exposed to [r31_cesfhx] before [r31_ceswf] |
1127 |
48.9% |
0.4891493 |
| 2 |
Exposed to [r31_cesfhx] after [r31_ceswf] |
1177 |
51.1% |
0.5108507 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9211 |
|
NA |
r31_ceswfx_1
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative: Use of processed slaughterhouse waste from pigs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to ensure food safety and reduce the climate impact of food,
the government has set a target which involves using more Norwegian raw
materials in salmon feed. This means that new raw materials will need to
be used in addition to those currently being used.
If [r31_cesfhx_ran] = 2: Today, soy, fish meal and fish oil are
important ingredients in such feed. 92% of these ingredients is
imported. If [r31_cesfhx_ran] != 2: BLANK.
Bones, entrails, blood and offcuts resulting from the slaughter of
pork, chicken/poultry and salmon (hereafter referred to as :
“slaughterhouse waste”) contain important substances that can be used in
the production of salmon feed. Although it is legal, processed
slaughterhouse waste is not used as a raw material in salmon feed in
Norway, but it is used elsewhere in the world.
How positive or negative are you about using processed slaughterhouse
waste from the following sources in the production of salmon feed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Pork
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
365 |
15.6% |
0.15618314 |
| 2 |
Positive |
549 |
23.5% |
0.23491656 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
299 |
12.8% |
0.12794181 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
631 |
27.0% |
0.27000428 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
127 |
5.4% |
0.05434318 |
| 6 |
Negative |
144 |
6.2% |
0.06161746 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
158 |
6.8% |
0.06760804 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
2.7% |
0.02738554 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_ceswfx_2
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative: Use of processed slaughterhouse waste from
chicken/poultry
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to ensure food safety and reduce the climate impact of food,
the government has set a target which involves using more Norwegian raw
materials in salmon feed. This means that new raw materials will need to
be used in addition to those currently being used.
If [r31_cesfhx_ran] = 2: Today, soy, fish meal and fish oil are
important ingredients in such feed. 92% of these ingredients is
imported. If [r31_cesfhx_ran] != 2: BLANK.
Bones, entrails, blood and offcuts resulting from the slaughter of
pork, chicken/poultry and salmon (hereafter referred to as :
“slaughterhouse waste”) contain important substances that can be used in
the production of salmon feed. Although it is legal, processed
slaughterhouse waste is not used as a raw material in salmon feed in
Norway, but it is used elsewhere in the world.
How positive or negative are you about using processed slaughterhouse
waste from the following sources in the production of salmon feed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Chicken/poultry
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
380 |
16.3% |
0.16260163 |
| 2 |
Positive |
573 |
24.5% |
0.24518614 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
303 |
13.0% |
0.12965340 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
633 |
27.1% |
0.27086008 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
117 |
5.0% |
0.05006418 |
| 6 |
Negative |
135 |
5.8% |
0.05776637 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
131 |
5.6% |
0.05605477 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
65 |
2.8% |
0.02781344 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_ceswfx_3
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative: Use of processed slaughterhouse waste from salmon
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to ensure food safety and reduce the climate impact of food,
the government has set a target which involves using more Norwegian raw
materials in salmon feed. This means that new raw materials will need to
be used in addition to those currently being used.
If [r31_cesfhx_ran] = 2: Today, soy, fish meal and fish oil are
important ingredients in such feed. 92% of these ingredients is
imported. If [r31_cesfhx_ran] != 2: BLANK.
Bones, entrails, blood and offcuts resulting from the slaughter of
pork, chicken/poultry and salmon (hereafter referred to as :
“slaughterhouse waste”) contain important substances that can be used in
the production of salmon feed. Although it is legal, processed
slaughterhouse waste is not used as a raw material in salmon feed in
Norway, but it is used elsewhere in the world.
How positive or negative are you about using processed slaughterhouse
waste from the following sources in the production of salmon feed?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Salmon
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
331 |
14.2% |
0.14163457 |
| 2 |
Positive |
527 |
22.6% |
0.22550278 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
271 |
11.6% |
0.11596063 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
648 |
27.7% |
0.27727856 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
159 |
6.8% |
0.06803594 |
| 6 |
Negative |
163 |
7.0% |
0.06974754 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
168 |
7.2% |
0.07188703 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
70 |
3.0% |
0.02995293 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_edteix_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [31_edteix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2302] [Invalid:9213]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
to make pupils’ learning outcomes as high as possible |
1143 |
49.7% |
0.4965248 |
| 2 |
that all pupils derive equal benefits from teaching |
1159 |
50.3% |
0.5034752 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9213 |
|
NA |
r31_edteix_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [31_edteix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2302] [Invalid:9213]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
woman |
1152 |
50.0% |
0.5004344 |
| 2 |
man |
1150 |
50.0% |
0.4995656 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9213 |
|
NA |
r31_edteix_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [31_edteix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2302] [Invalid:9213]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
20s |
766 |
33.3% |
0.3327541 |
| 2 |
40s |
806 |
35.0% |
0.3501303 |
| 3 |
60s |
730 |
31.7% |
0.3171156 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9213 |
|
NA |
r31_edteix_ran4
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [31_edteix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2302] [Invalid:9213]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
both give marks as well as verbal feedback to each individual pupil about what
they should be working on next |
1136 |
49.3% |
0.4934839 |
| 2 |
uses artificial intelligence in order to help set marks and provide verbal
feedback to each individual pupil about what they should be working on next |
1166 |
50.7% |
0.5065161 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9213 |
|
NA |
r31_edteix
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent can you identify with the teacher?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine a secondary school teacher whose goal is [r31_edteix_ran1].
Imagine a common class situation where the teacher, in this case a
[r31_edteix_ran2] in [r31_edteix_ran3], [r31_edteix_ran4] in order to
achieve this goal.
To what extent can you identify with this teacher?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
227 |
9.7% |
0.09713308 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
581 |
24.9% |
0.24860933 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
659 |
28.2% |
0.28198545 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
509 |
21.8% |
0.21780060 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
316 |
13.5% |
0.13521609 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
1.9% |
0.01925546 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_edteax
|
Variable label:
|
How acceptable do you think the teacher’s approach is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine a secondary school teacher whose goal is [r31_edteix_ran1].
Imagine a common class situation where the teacher, in this case a
[r31_edteix_ran2] in [r31_edteix_ran3], [r31_edteix_ran4] in order to
achieve this goal.
How acceptable do you think the teacher’s approach is?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly acceptable |
543 |
23.2% |
0.23234917 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
707 |
30.3% |
0.30252460 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
462 |
19.8% |
0.19768935 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
387 |
16.6% |
0.16559692 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
170 |
7.3% |
0.07274283 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
68 |
2.9% |
0.02909713 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_edtedx_1
|
Variable label:
|
How well do you think the following description fits the teacher: is
friendly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a secondary school teacher who aims to [r31_edteix_ran1].
Imagine a common class situation where the teacher, in this case a
[r31_edteix_ran2] in [r31_edteix_ran3], [r31_edteix_ran4] in order to
achieve this goal.
How well do you think the following description fits the teacher? The
person concerned …
|
|
Literal question:
|
…is friendly
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly suitable |
321 |
13.7% |
0.13735558 |
| 2 |
Suitable |
895 |
38.3% |
0.38296962 |
| 3 |
Fairly suitable |
628 |
26.9% |
0.26872058 |
| 4 |
Not very suitable |
226 |
9.7% |
0.09670518 |
| 5 |
Not at all suitable |
114 |
4.9% |
0.04878049 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
153 |
6.5% |
0.06546855 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_edtedx_2
|
Variable label:
|
How well do you think the following description fits the teacher: has
good intentions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a secondary school teacher who aims to [r31_edteix_ran1].
Imagine a common class situation where the teacher, in this case a
[r31_edteix_ran2] in [r31_edteix_ran3], [r31_edteix_ran4] in order to
achieve this goal.
How well do you think the following description fits the teacher? The
person concerned …
|
|
Literal question:
|
…has good intentions
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly suitable |
645 |
27.6% |
0.27599487 |
| 2 |
Suitable |
1036 |
44.3% |
0.44330338 |
| 3 |
Fairly suitable |
402 |
17.2% |
0.17201540 |
| 4 |
Not very suitable |
99 |
4.2% |
0.04236200 |
| 5 |
Not at all suitable |
53 |
2.3% |
0.02267865 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
102 |
4.4% |
0.04364570 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_edtedx_3
|
Variable label:
|
How well do you think the following description fits the teacher: is
competent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a secondary school teacher who aims to [r31_edteix_ran1].
Imagine a common class situation where the teacher, in this case a
[r31_edteix_ran2] in [r31_edteix_ran3], [r31_edteix_ran4] in order to
achieve this goal.
How well do you think the following description fits the teacher? The
person concerned …
|
|
Literal question:
|
…is competent
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly suitable |
372 |
15.9% |
0.15917843 |
| 2 |
Suitable |
878 |
37.6% |
0.37569534 |
| 3 |
Fairly suitable |
531 |
22.7% |
0.22721438 |
| 4 |
Not very suitable |
329 |
14.1% |
0.14077878 |
| 5 |
Not at all suitable |
102 |
4.4% |
0.04364570 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
125 |
5.3% |
0.05348738 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_edtedx_4
|
Variable label:
|
How well do you think the following description fits the teacher: is
intelligent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a secondary school teacher who aims to [r31_edteix_ran1].
Imagine a common class situation where the teacher, in this case a
[r31_edteix_ran2] in [r31_edteix_ran3], [r31_edteix_ran4] in order to
achieve this goal.
How well do you think the following description fits the teacher? The
person concerned …
|
|
Literal question:
|
…is intelligent
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 2)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly suitable |
291 |
12.5% |
0.12451861 |
| 2 |
Suitable |
918 |
39.3% |
0.39281130 |
| 3 |
Fairly suitable |
618 |
26.4% |
0.26444159 |
| 4 |
Not very suitable |
261 |
11.2% |
0.11168164 |
| 5 |
Not at all suitable |
99 |
4.2% |
0.04236200 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
150 |
6.4% |
0.06418485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_mlinlx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_mlinlx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2305] [Invalid:9210]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
climate policy |
738 |
32.0% |
0.3201735 |
| 2 |
safety and contingency policy |
778 |
33.8% |
0.3375271 |
| 3 |
health policy |
789 |
34.2% |
0.3422993 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_mlinlx_1
|
Variable label:
|
Who should have the most influence in your local community: Your
municipal council
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The policies which apply in your local community are influenced by
different elected bodies that have varying degrees of influence. As
regards to [r31_mlinlx_ran] in your local community, who do you think
should have the most influence?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your municipal council
|
|
Post-question:
|
Below you can rate them on a scale of the most to the least influence by
clicking on the alternatives in sequence.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ranked your municipal council as number 1 |
823 |
35.7% |
0.3570499 |
| 2 |
Ranked your municipal council as number 2 |
393 |
17.0% |
0.1704989 |
| 3 |
Ranked your municipal council as number 3 |
288 |
12.5% |
0.1249458 |
| 4 |
Ranked your municipal council as number 4 |
124 |
5.4% |
0.0537961 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
677 |
29.4% |
0.2937093 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_mlinlx_2
|
Variable label:
|
Who should have the most influence in your local community: Your county
council
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The policies which apply in your local community are influenced by
different elected bodies that have varying degrees of influence. As
regards to [r31_mlinlx_ran] in your local community, who do you think
should have the most influence?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your county council
|
|
Post-question:
|
Below you can rate them on a scale of the most to the least influence by
clicking on the alternatives in order.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ranked your county as number 1 |
258 |
11.2% |
0.11193059 |
| 2 |
Ranked your county as number 2 |
559 |
24.3% |
0.24251627 |
| 3 |
Ranked your county as number 3 |
453 |
19.7% |
0.19652928 |
| 4 |
Ranked your county as number 4 |
106 |
4.6% |
0.04598698 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
929 |
40.3% |
0.40303688 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_mlinlx_3
|
Variable label:
|
Who should have the most influence in your local community: The Storting
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The policies which apply in your local community are influenced by
different elected bodies that have varying degrees of influence. As
regards to [r31_mlinlx_ran] in your local community, who do you think
should have the most influence?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Storting
|
|
Post-question:
|
Below you can rate them on a scale of the most to the least influence by
clicking on the alternatives in order.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ranked the Storting as number 1 |
1088 |
47.2% |
0.472017354 |
| 2 |
Ranked the Storting as number 2 |
258 |
11.2% |
0.111930586 |
| 3 |
Ranked the Storting as number 3 |
423 |
18.4% |
0.183514100 |
| 4 |
Ranked the Storting as number 4 |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004338395 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
526 |
22.8% |
0.228199566 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_mlinlx_4
|
Variable label:
|
Who should have the most influence in your local community: The European
Parliament
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The policies which apply in your local community are influenced by
different elected bodies that have varying degrees of influence. As
regards to [r31_mlinlx_ran] in your local community, who do you think
should have the most influence?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The European Parliament
|
|
Post-question:
|
Below you can rate them on a scale of the most to the least influence by
clicking on the alternatives in order.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ranked the European Parliament as number 1 |
86 |
3.7% |
0.03731020 |
| 2 |
Ranked the European Parliament as number 2 |
96 |
4.2% |
0.04164859 |
| 3 |
Ranked the European Parliament as number 3 |
85 |
3.7% |
0.03687636 |
| 4 |
Ranked the European Parliament as number 4 |
959 |
41.6% |
0.41605206 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1079 |
46.8% |
0.46811280 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_enhydx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_enhydx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2298] [Invalid:9217]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
“green hydrogen”, which is produced by electricity from renewable hydropower
from the grid, which basically does not involve any CO2 emissions. |
813 |
35.4% |
0.3537859 |
| 2 |
“green hydrogen”, which is produced by electricity from renewable wind power
from either offshore or onshore wind turbines, which basically does not involve
any CO2 emissions. |
745 |
32.4% |
0.3241950 |
| 3 |
“blue hydrogen”, which is produced from natural gas, which involves CO2
emissions, but where 90-95% of such CO2 emissions will be stored below the
seabed on the continental shelf (so-called carbon capture and storage). |
740 |
32.2% |
0.3220191 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9217 |
|
NA |
r31_enhydx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_enhydx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2298] [Invalid:9217]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The hydrogen produced is mainly used for helping to reduce onshore CO2
emissions. |
1151 |
50.1% |
0.5008703 |
| 2 |
The hydrogen produced will mainly be exported to help reduce CO2 emissions
abroad. |
1147 |
49.9% |
0.4991297 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9217 |
|
NA |
r31_enhydx
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you support the state in funding this hydrogen
initiative?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway aims to develop a hydrogen industry with no or low greenhouse
gas emissions. In order for hydrogen to become a competitive alternative
to fossil fuels, it is relevant for the state to provide the industry
with financial support.
Imagine Norway is going to invest in so-called [r31_enhydx_ran1]
[r31_enhydx_ran2]
To what extent do you support the state in funding this hydrogen
initiative?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p11_enhydx
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
205 |
8.9% |
0.08893709 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
571 |
24.8% |
0.24772234 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
812 |
35.2% |
0.35227766 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
426 |
18.5% |
0.18481562 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
240 |
10.4% |
0.10412148 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
2.2% |
0.02212581 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_cecfk
|
Variable label:
|
Would you have wanted to know the climate impact of the dish
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine you’re going into a café to buy lunch. You’ve had a busy day
and are now hungry and looking forward to finding something to enjoy.
You know you should eat more climate-friendly food, and there are
several dishes on the menu that you think look particularly good. The
café offers a variety of tempting lunch dishes, and one that has caught
your attention is a hot dish. A friend of yours says she’s tasted it
before and it’s as good as it looks.
Before you decide whether or not you would like to order the hot dish,
we are wondering if you would like to know what the carbon footprint of
this dish is:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I want to know exactly what the climate footprint of the hot dish is |
529 |
23.0% |
0.22950108 |
| 2 |
I do NOT want to know exactly what the climate footprint of the hot dish is |
1716 |
74.4% |
0.74446855 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
2.6% |
0.02603037 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_cecfkx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_cecfkx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2275] [Invalid:9240]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0.5 |
776 |
34.1% |
0.3410989 |
| 2 |
1.5 |
747 |
32.8% |
0.3283516 |
| 3 |
2.5 |
752 |
33.1% |
0.3305495 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9240 |
|
NA |
r31_cecfkx_pipe
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects a picture for [r31_cecfkx] based on
[r31_cecfkx_ran].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_cecfkx_ran] = 1 the value is set to 1. If [r31_cecfkx_ran] = 2
the value is set to 2. If [r31_cecfkx_ran] = 3 the value is set to 3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2275] [Invalid:9240]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Picture 1 |
776 |
34.1% |
0.3410989 |
| 2 |
Picture 2 |
747 |
32.8% |
0.3283516 |
| 3 |
Picture 3 |
752 |
33.1% |
0.3305495 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9240 |
|
NA |
r31_cecfkx
|
Variable label:
|
Would you have ordered the dish
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If [r31_cecfk] = 2: Regardless of what you selected in the previous
question, we would like you to imagine that you were still made aware of
information about the dish’s climate footprint. Before you decide if you
would like to order a hot dish or not, you will now learn exactly what
the climate footprint of your hot dish is. If [r31_cecfk] != 2: Blank
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r31_cecfkx_pipe]
The hot dish contains [r31_cecfkx_ran] kgs of CO2 equivalents.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I would like to order the hot dish |
1663 |
72.1% |
0.72147505 |
| 2 |
I do NOT wish to order the hot dish |
579 |
25.1% |
0.25119306 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
2.7% |
0.02733189 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_eqseax_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_eqseax].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2274] [Invalid:9241]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
bisexual |
772 |
33.9% |
0.3394899 |
| 2 |
heterosexual |
726 |
31.9% |
0.3192612 |
| 3 |
lesbian |
776 |
34.1% |
0.3412489 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9241 |
|
NA |
r31_eqseax_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Marie was responsible for what happened.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine this hypothetical situation:
Marie is 28 years old and works for the health services. She is
[r31_eqseax_ran] and currently single. She’s been to a party and
accompanies her friend Christian home. They’re both a bit drunk and
Marie goes inside with Christian to get a glass of water. They sit and
talk for a while, but then the atmosphere changes and Christian forces
Marie to have sex.
Based on your impression of the situation and the people described
above, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marie was responsible for what happened.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
16 |
0.7% |
0.006941432 |
| 2 |
Agree |
37 |
1.6% |
0.016052061 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
116 |
5.0% |
0.050325380 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
137 |
5.9% |
0.059436009 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
111 |
4.8% |
0.048156182 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
498 |
21.6% |
0.216052061 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1292 |
56.1% |
0.560520607 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
98 |
4.3% |
0.042516269 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_eqseax_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: This happened because Marie was careless.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine this hypothetical situation:
Marie is 28 years old and works for the health services. She is
[r31_eqseax_ran] and currently single. She’s been to a party and
accompanies her friend Christian home. They’re both a bit drunk and
Marie goes inside with Christian to get a glass of water. They sit and
talk for a while, but then the atmosphere changes and Christian forces
Marie to have sex.
Based on your impression of the situation and the people described
above, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
This happened because Marie was careless.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005206074 |
| 2 |
Agree |
40 |
1.7% |
0.017353579 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
146 |
6.3% |
0.063340564 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
168 |
7.3% |
0.072885033 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
154 |
6.7% |
0.066811280 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
573 |
24.9% |
0.248590022 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1105 |
47.9% |
0.479392625 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
107 |
4.6% |
0.046420824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_eqseax_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Christian was responsible for what happened.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine this hypothetical situation:
Marie is 28 years old and works for the health services. She is
[r31_eqseax_ran] and currently single. She’s been to a party and
accompanies her friend Christian home. They’re both a bit drunk and
Marie goes inside with Christian to get a glass of water. They sit and
talk for a while, but then the atmosphere changes and Christian forces
Marie to have sex.
Based on your impression of the situation and the people described
above, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Christian was responsible for what happened.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1390 |
60.3% |
0.603036876 |
| 2 |
Agree |
596 |
25.9% |
0.258568330 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
138 |
6.0% |
0.059869848 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
79 |
3.4% |
0.034273319 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
13 |
0.6% |
0.005639913 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
10 |
0.4% |
0.004338395 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
0.6% |
0.006073753 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
65 |
2.8% |
0.028199566 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_eqseax_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: This happened because Christian was careless.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine this hypothetical situation:
Marie is 28 years old and works for the health services. She is
[r31_eqseax_ran] and currently single. She’s been to a party and
accompanies her friend Christian home. They’re both a bit drunk and
Marie goes inside with Christian to get a glass of water. They sit and
talk for a while, but then the atmosphere changes and Christian forces
Marie to have sex.
Based on your impression of the situation and the people described
above, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
This happened because Christian was careless.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
488 |
21.2% |
0.21171367 |
| 2 |
Agree |
335 |
14.5% |
0.14533623 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
167 |
7.2% |
0.07245119 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
464 |
20.1% |
0.20130152 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
80 |
3.5% |
0.03470716 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
276 |
12.0% |
0.11973970 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
374 |
16.2% |
0.16225597 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
121 |
5.2% |
0.05249458 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_eqseax_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Christian had reason to think that Marie wanted to have
sex.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine this hypothetical situation:
Marie is 28 years old and works for the health services. She is
[r31_eqseax_ran] and currently single. She’s been to a party and
accompanies her friend Christian home. They’re both a bit drunk and
Marie goes inside with Christian to get a glass of water. They sit and
talk for a while, but then the atmosphere changes and Christian forces
Marie to have sex.
Based on your impression of the situation and the people described
above, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Christian had reason to think that Marie wanted to have sex.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
24 |
1.0% |
0.01041215 |
| 2 |
Agree |
28 |
1.2% |
0.01214751 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
99 |
4.3% |
0.04295011 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
229 |
9.9% |
0.09934924 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
141 |
6.1% |
0.06117137 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
567 |
24.6% |
0.24598698 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1114 |
48.3% |
0.48329718 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
103 |
4.5% |
0.04468547 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_eqseax_6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Marie seems to have had many sex partners.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine this hypothetical situation:
Marie is 28 years old and works for the health services. She is
[r31_eqseax_ran] and currently single. She’s been to a party and
accompanies her friend Christian home. They’re both a bit drunk and
Marie goes inside with Christian to get a glass of water. They sit and
talk for a while, but then the atmosphere changes and Christian forces
Marie to have sex.
Based on your impression of the situation and the people described
above, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marie seems to have had many sex partners.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
8 |
0.3% |
0.003470716 |
| 2 |
Agree |
8 |
0.3% |
0.003470716 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
34 |
1.5% |
0.014750542 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
828 |
35.9% |
0.359219089 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
39 |
1.7% |
0.016919740 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
336 |
14.6% |
0.145770065 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
942 |
40.9% |
0.408676790 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
110 |
4.8% |
0.047722343 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_eqseax_7
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Marie was harmed by what happened.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine this hypothetical situation:
Marie is 28 years old and works for the health services. She is
[r31_eqseax_ran] and currently single. She’s been to a party and
accompanies her friend Christian home. They’re both a bit drunk and
Marie goes inside with Christian to get a glass of water. They sit and
talk for a while, but then the atmosphere changes and Christian forces
Marie to have sex.
Based on your impression of the situation and the people described
above, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marie was harmed by what happened.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
688 |
29.8% |
0.29848156 |
| 2 |
Agree |
638 |
27.7% |
0.27678959 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
273 |
11.8% |
0.11843818 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
484 |
21.0% |
0.20997831 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
50 |
2.2% |
0.02169197 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
40 |
1.7% |
0.01735358 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
19 |
0.8% |
0.00824295 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
113 |
4.9% |
0.04902386 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_eqseax_8
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Marie was traumatised by what happened.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine this hypothetical situation:
Marie is 28 years old and works for the health services. She is
[r31_eqseax_ran] and currently single. She’s been to a party and
accompanies her friend Christian home. They’re both a bit drunk and
Marie goes inside with Christian to get a glass of water. They sit and
talk for a while, but then the atmosphere changes and Christian forces
Marie to have sex.
Based on your impression of the situation and the people described
above, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marie was traumatised by what happened.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
574 |
24.9% |
0.249023861 |
| 2 |
Agree |
514 |
22.3% |
0.222993492 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
324 |
14.1% |
0.140563991 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
651 |
28.2% |
0.282429501 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
56 |
2.4% |
0.024295011 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
54 |
2.3% |
0.023427332 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
23 |
1.0% |
0.009978308 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
109 |
4.7% |
0.047288503 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_eqsymx
|
Variable label:
|
Who do you feel most sorry for, Christian or Marie?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Who do you feel most sorry for, Christian or Marie?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Answer list display order: Random direction]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Mainly sorry for Marie |
1695 |
73.5% |
0.735357918 |
| 2 |
A little more sorry for Marie than Christian |
259 |
11.2% |
0.112364425 |
| 3 |
Equally sorry for Marie and Christian. |
257 |
11.1% |
0.111496746 |
| 4 |
A little more sorry for Christian than Marie |
8 |
0.3% |
0.003470716 |
| 5 |
Mainly sorry for Christian. |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004772234 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
3.3% |
0.032537961 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_eqsymx_order
|
Variable label:
|
Displays the order of answer alternatives in [r31_eqsymx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_eqsymx_order] = 0 the alternatives was displayed in the default
order. If [r31_eqsymx_order] = 1 the alternatives was displayed in
reversed order.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2270] [Invalid:9245]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Normal order |
1122 |
49.4% |
0.4942731 |
| 1 |
Reverse order |
1148 |
50.6% |
0.5057269 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9245 |
|
NA |
r31_eqsabx
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you would behave like Christian in such a
situation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would behave like Christian in such a
situation?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent is male and (r31_group = 3)]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_eqsasx
|
Variable label:
|
Would you say that what Marie experienced was sexual assault?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that what Marie experienced was a sexual assault?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1922 |
83.4% |
0.8338395 |
| 2 |
No |
312 |
13.5% |
0.1353579 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
3.1% |
0.0308026 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_edsbix_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_edsbix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2267] [Invalid:9248]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
to make pupils’ learning outcomes as high as possible |
1146 |
50.6% |
0.5055139 |
| 2 |
that all pupils derive equal benefits from teaching |
1121 |
49.4% |
0.4944861 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9248 |
|
NA |
r31_edsbix_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Eksperiment. Velger tilfeldig et element til tekstfletting i
[r31_edsbix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2267] [Invalid:9248]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
woman |
1149 |
50.7% |
0.5068372 |
| 2 |
man |
1118 |
49.3% |
0.4931628 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9248 |
|
NA |
r31_edsbix_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Eksperiment. Velger tilfeldig et element til tekstfletting i
[r31_edsbix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2267] [Invalid:9248]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
20s |
752 |
33.2% |
0.3317159 |
| 2 |
40s |
726 |
32.0% |
0.3202470 |
| 3 |
60s |
789 |
34.8% |
0.3480371 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9248 |
|
NA |
r31_edsbix_ran4
|
Variable label:
|
Eksperiment. Velger tilfeldig et element til tekstfletting i
[r31_edsbix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2267] [Invalid:9248]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
uses their accumulated experience to suggest how resources should be distributed
between the various primary schools in the area |
1090 |
48.1% |
0.4808116 |
| 2 |
uses artificial intelligence to suggest how resources should be distributed
between the various primary schools in the area |
1177 |
51.9% |
0.5191884 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9248 |
|
NA |
r31_edsbix
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent can you identify with this school administration
employee?
|
|
Literal question:
|
School administration employees should serve citizens’ interests by
following up on politically determined primary school goals, which
include [r31_edsbix_ran1]. Imagine a common situation where the
employee, in this case a [r31_edsbix_ran2] in [r31_edsbix_ran3],
[r31_edsbix_ran4] in order to achieve this goal.
To what extent can you identify with this school administration
employee?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
112 |
4.9% |
0.04859002 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
364 |
15.8% |
0.15791757 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
793 |
34.4% |
0.34403471 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
628 |
27.2% |
0.27245119 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
342 |
14.8% |
0.14837310 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
66 |
2.9% |
0.02863341 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_edsbax
|
Variable label:
|
How acceptable do you think the employee’s approach is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
School administration employees should serve citizens’ interests by
following up on politically determined primary school goals, which
include [r31_edsbix_ran1]. Imagine a common situation where the
employee, in this case a [r31_edsbix_ran2] in [r31_edsbix_ran3],
[r31_edsbix_ran4] in order to achieve this goal.
How acceptable do you think the employee’s approach is?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly acceptable |
153 |
6.6% |
0.06637744 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
739 |
32.1% |
0.32060738 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
727 |
31.5% |
0.31540130 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
431 |
18.7% |
0.18698482 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
148 |
6.4% |
0.06420824 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
107 |
4.6% |
0.04642082 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_edsbdx_1
|
Variable label:
|
How well do you think the following description fits the employee: is
friendly
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
School administration employees should serve citizens’ interests by
following up on politically determined primary school goals, which
include [r31_edsbix_ran1]. Imagine a common situation where the
employee, in this case a [r31_edsbix_ran2] in [r31_edsbix_ran3],
[r31_edsbix_ran4] in order to achieve this goal.
How well do you think the following description fits the employee. The
person concerned …
|
|
Literal question:
|
…is friendly
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly suitable |
90 |
3.9% |
0.03904555 |
| 2 |
Suitable |
612 |
26.6% |
0.26550976 |
| 3 |
Fairly suitable |
908 |
39.4% |
0.39392625 |
| 4 |
Not very suitable |
245 |
10.6% |
0.10629067 |
| 5 |
Not at all suitable |
163 |
7.1% |
0.07071584 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
287 |
12.5% |
0.12451193 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_edsbdx_2
|
Variable label:
|
How well do you think the following description fits the employee: has
good intentions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
School administration employees should serve citizens’ interests by
following up on politically determined primary school goals, which
include [r31_edsbix_ran1]. Imagine a common situation where the
employee, in this case a [r31_edsbix_ran2] in [r31_edsbix_ran3],
[r31_edsbix_ran4] in order to achieve this goal.
How well do you think the following description fits the employee. The
person concerned …
|
|
Literal question:
|
…has good intentions
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly suitable |
348 |
15.1% |
0.15097614 |
| 2 |
Suitable |
1060 |
46.0% |
0.45986985 |
| 3 |
Fairly suitable |
553 |
24.0% |
0.23991323 |
| 4 |
Not very suitable |
124 |
5.4% |
0.05379610 |
| 5 |
Not at all suitable |
45 |
2.0% |
0.01952278 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
175 |
7.6% |
0.07592191 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_edsbdx_3
|
Variable label:
|
How well do you think the following description fits the employee: is
competent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
School administration employees should serve citizens’ interests by
following up on politically determined primary school goals, which
include [r31_edsbix_ran1]. Imagine a common situation where the
employee, in this case a [r31_edsbix_ran2] in [r31_edsbix_ran3],
[r31_edsbix_ran4] in order to achieve this goal.
How well do you think the following description fits the employee. The
person concerned …
|
|
Literal question:
|
…is competent
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly suitable |
148 |
6.4% |
0.06420824 |
| 2 |
Suitable |
747 |
32.4% |
0.32407809 |
| 3 |
Fairly suitable |
700 |
30.4% |
0.30368764 |
| 4 |
Not very suitable |
362 |
15.7% |
0.15704989 |
| 5 |
Not at all suitable |
132 |
5.7% |
0.05726681 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
216 |
9.4% |
0.09370933 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_edsbdx_4
|
Variable label:
|
How well do you think the following description fits the employee: is
intelligent
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
School administration employees should serve citizens’ interests by
following up on politically determined primary school goals, which
include [r31_edsbix_ran1]. Imagine a common situation where the
employee, in this case a [r31_edsbix_ran2] in [r31_edsbix_ran3],
[r31_edsbix_ran4] in order to achieve this goal.
How well do you think the following description fits the employee. The
person concerned …
|
|
Literal question:
|
…is intelligent
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly suitable |
116 |
5.0% |
0.05032538 |
| 2 |
Suitable |
694 |
30.1% |
0.30108460 |
| 3 |
Fairly suitable |
830 |
36.0% |
0.36008677 |
| 4 |
Not very suitable |
289 |
12.5% |
0.12537961 |
| 5 |
Not at all suitable |
118 |
5.1% |
0.05119306 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
258 |
11.2% |
0.11193059 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpce
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Authorities should be able to censor media that are too
critical of the authorities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
The authorities should be able to censor media that are too critical of
the authorities.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dmpop], [r31_dmpvr], [r31_dmper],
[r31_dmpgc], [r31_dmpgo], [r31_dmpbl].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
9 |
0.4% |
0.003904555 |
| 2 |
Agree |
9 |
0.4% |
0.003904555 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
38 |
1.6% |
0.016485900 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
44 |
1.9% |
0.019088937 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
55 |
2.4% |
0.023861171 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
385 |
16.7% |
0.167028200 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1686 |
73.1% |
0.731453362 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
79 |
3.4% |
0.034273319 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpop
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Norway would be better off if there was only one
political party.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
Norway would be better off if there was only one political party.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dmpce], [r31_dmpvr], [r31_dmper],
[r31_dmpgc], [r31_dmpgo], [r31_dmpbl].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
15 |
0.7% |
0.006507592 |
| 2 |
Agree |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005206074 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
24 |
1.0% |
0.010412148 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
54 |
2.3% |
0.023427332 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
37 |
1.6% |
0.016052061 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
380 |
16.5% |
0.164859002 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1714 |
74.4% |
0.743600868 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
69 |
3.0% |
0.029934924 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpvr
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: There are so many people who do not know anything about
politics, that maybe the right to vote should not be available to
everyone.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
There are so many people who do not know anything about politics, that
maybe the right to vote should not be available to everyone.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dmpce], [r31_dmpop], [r31_dmper],
[r31_dmpgc], [r31_dmpgo], [r31_dmpbl].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
41 |
1.8% |
0.01778742 |
| 2 |
Agree |
38 |
1.6% |
0.01648590 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
112 |
4.9% |
0.04859002 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
98 |
4.3% |
0.04251627 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
116 |
5.0% |
0.05032538 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
532 |
23.1% |
0.23080260 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1295 |
56.2% |
0.56182213 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
73 |
3.2% |
0.03167028 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_dmper
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Governments should be allowed to amend electoral rules
(e.g. the distribution of parliamentary mandates) to their advantage if
their opponents have also done the same previously.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
Governments should be allowed to amend electoral rules (e.g. the
distribution of parliamentary mandates) to their advantage if their
opponents have also done the same previously.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dmpce], [r31_dmpop], [r31_dmpvr],
[r31_dmpgc], [r31_dmpgo], [r31_dmpbl].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
9 |
0.4% |
0.003904555 |
| 2 |
Agree |
44 |
1.9% |
0.019088937 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
74 |
3.2% |
0.032104121 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
257 |
11.1% |
0.111496746 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
131 |
5.7% |
0.056832972 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
517 |
22.4% |
0.224295011 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1199 |
52.0% |
0.520173536 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
3.2% |
0.032104121 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpgc
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The government should be able to oppose decisions made
by the Supreme Court that have a political bias.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
The government should be able to oppose decisions made by the Supreme
Court that have a political bias.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dmpce], [r31_dmpop], [r31_dmpvr],
[r31_dmper], [r31_dmpgo], [r31_dmpbl].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
37 |
1.6% |
0.01605206 |
| 2 |
Agree |
76 |
3.3% |
0.03297180 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
143 |
6.2% |
0.06203905 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
271 |
11.8% |
0.11757050 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
159 |
6.9% |
0.06898048 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
566 |
24.6% |
0.24555315 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
982 |
42.6% |
0.42603037 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
3.1% |
0.03080260 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpgo
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: It should be possible for the Storting to be overridden
by the government if it hampers the government’s work.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
It should be possible for the Storting to be overridden by the
government if it hampers the government’s work.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dmpce], [r31_dmpop], [r31_dmpvr],
[r31_dmper], [r31_dmpgc], [r31_dmpbl].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007809111 |
| 2 |
Agree |
58 |
2.5% |
0.025162690 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
143 |
6.2% |
0.062039046 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
245 |
10.6% |
0.106290672 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
187 |
8.1% |
0.081127983 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
580 |
25.2% |
0.251626898 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1000 |
43.4% |
0.433839479 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
3.2% |
0.032104121 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpbl
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The government should be able to bend legislation in
order to resolve critical social and political challenges.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following principles
about how a political system should be organised and governed?
The government should be able to bend legislation in order to resolve
critical social and political challenges.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dmpce], [r31_dmpop], [r31_dmpvr],
[r31_dmper], [r31_dmpgc], [r31_dmpgo].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01301518 |
| 2 |
Agree |
120 |
5.2% |
0.05206074 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
321 |
13.9% |
0.13926247 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
189 |
8.2% |
0.08199566 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
242 |
10.5% |
0.10498915 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
600 |
26.0% |
0.26030369 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
725 |
31.5% |
0.31453362 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
78 |
3.4% |
0.03383948 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_dmpos_order
|
Variable label:
|
Shows the order of the questions [r31_dmpce], [r31_dmpop], [r31_dmpvr],
[r31_dmper], [r31_dmpgc], [r31_dmpgo], and [r31_dmpbl] was displayed in.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2256] [Invalid:9259]
[Range:-]
|
r31_teaih
|
Variable label:
|
How long until artificial intelligence is as intelligent as humans
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to make a guess, how long do you think it will take before
artificial intelligence (AI) becomes as intelligent as humans in all
areas?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It already exists |
229 |
9.9% |
0.09934924 |
| 2 |
1-4 years |
305 |
13.2% |
0.13232104 |
| 3 |
5-9 years |
354 |
15.4% |
0.15357918 |
| 4 |
10-49 years |
437 |
19.0% |
0.18958785 |
| 5 |
50+ years |
127 |
5.5% |
0.05509761 |
| 6 |
It will never happen |
771 |
33.4% |
0.33449024 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
82 |
3.6% |
0.03557484 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_teair
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: International regulations should be created to slow down
the development of artificial intelligence.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement?
International regulations should be drawn up to slow down the
development of artificial intelligence.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
454 |
19.7% |
0.19696312 |
| 2 |
Agree |
513 |
22.3% |
0.22255965 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
547 |
23.7% |
0.23731020 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
343 |
14.9% |
0.14880694 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
141 |
6.1% |
0.06117137 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
164 |
7.1% |
0.07114967 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
73 |
3.2% |
0.03167028 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
70 |
3.0% |
0.03036876 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_teaiw
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Artificial intelligence will significantly change the
job tasks in my industry.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement?
Artificial intelligence will greatly change the work carried out in my
field of work.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
196 |
8.5% |
0.08503254 |
| 2 |
Agree |
427 |
18.5% |
0.18524946 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
521 |
22.6% |
0.22603037 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
209 |
9.1% |
0.09067245 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
141 |
6.1% |
0.06117137 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
182 |
7.9% |
0.07895879 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
109 |
4.7% |
0.04728850 |
| 8 |
Not relevant |
452 |
19.6% |
0.19609544 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
68 |
3.0% |
0.02950108 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9210 |
|
NA |
r31_plseo_1
|
Variable label:
|
Sexual orientation: Heterosexual
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a question about sexual orientation.
Do you consider yourself to be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Heterosexual
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_plseo_2
|
Variable label:
|
Sexual orientation: Homosexual
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a question about sexual orientation.
Do you consider yourself to be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Homosexual
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_plseo_3
|
Variable label:
|
Sexual orientation: Lesbian
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a question about sexual orientation.
Do you consider yourself to be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Lesbian
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_plseo_4
|
Variable label:
|
Sexual orientation: Bisexual
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a question about sexual orientation.
Do you consider yourself to be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Bisexual
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_plseo_5
|
Variable label:
|
Sexual orientation: Pansexual
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a question about sexual orientation.
Do you consider yourself to be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Pansexual
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_plseo_6
|
Variable label:
|
Sexual orientation: Queer
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a question about sexual orientation.
Do you consider yourself to be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Queer
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_plseo_7
|
Variable label:
|
Sexual orientation: Asexual
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a question about sexual orientation.
Do you consider yourself to be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Asexual
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_plseo_8
|
Variable label:
|
Sexual orientation: Uncertain/questioning
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a question about sexual orientation.
Do you consider yourself to be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Uncertain/questioning
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_plseo_9
|
Variable label:
|
Sexual orientation: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a question about sexual orientation.
Do you consider yourself to be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_plseo_9_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Sexual orientation: Open ended
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a question about sexual orientation.
Do you consider yourself to be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_plseo_10
|
Variable label:
|
Sexual orientation: Do not wish to answer
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a question about sexual orientation.
Do you consider yourself to be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do not wish to answer
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3)]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_dmtelx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dmtelx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2245] [Invalid:9270]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In Norway, the average term for parliamentary representatives is 8 years. |
575 |
25.6% |
0.2561247 |
| 2 |
In Norway, the average age of parliamentary representatives is 48 years. |
527 |
23.5% |
0.2347439 |
| 3 |
In Norway, the parliamentary representative with the longest period in office
has been there for 34 years. |
573 |
25.5% |
0.2552339 |
| 4 |
BLANK |
570 |
25.4% |
0.2538976 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_dmtelx
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: a restriction of 3 election periods (12 years) should be
imposed for election to the Storting?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some countries are considering imposing restrictions on how long
politicians can sit in parliament.
[r31_dmtelx_ran]
To what extent do you agree or disagree that a restriction of 3 election
periods (12 years) should be imposed for election to the Storting?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
463 |
20.6% |
0.206236080 |
| 2 |
Agree |
557 |
24.8% |
0.248106904 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
434 |
19.3% |
0.193318486 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
409 |
18.2% |
0.182182628 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
177 |
7.9% |
0.078841871 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
163 |
7.3% |
0.072605791 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
38 |
1.7% |
0.016926503 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001781737 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_dmaicx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dmaicx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2245] [Invalid:9270]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
420 |
18.7% |
0.1870824 |
| 2 |
Imagine if the courts were to implement a system based on artificial
intelligence that would serve as a support tool for judges in determining the
type of punishment and its length. Among other things, the system has access to
a large number of similar cases and is able to accurately estimate the type of
punishment and its duration in almost all cases. Due to the complex nature of
the algorithm, it is not possible to know which factors the algorithm has given
the most weight to. |
446 |
19.9% |
0.1986637 |
| 3 |
Imagine if the courts were to implement a system based on artificial
intelligence that would serve as a support tool for judges in determining the
type of punishment and its duration. Among other things, the system has access
to a large number of similar cases and is able to accurately estimate the type
of punishment and its duration in almost all cases. The algorithm’s decision is
easy to understand, and it is possible to determine which factors the algorithm
has given the most weight to. |
485 |
21.6% |
0.2160356 |
| 4 |
Imagine that the courts are implementing a system based on artificial
intelligence that will make a final decision on the type of punishment and its
duration. Among other things, the system has access to a large number of similar
cases and is able to accurately estimate the type of punishment and its duration
in almost all cases. The algorithm’s decision is easy to understand, and it is
possible to determine which factors the algorithm has given the most weight to. |
467 |
20.8% |
0.2080178 |
| 5 |
Imagine that the courts are implementing a system based on artificial
intelligence that will make a final decision on the type of punishment and its
duration. Among other things, the system has access to a large number of similar
cases and is able to accurately estimate the type of punishment and its duration
in almost all cases. The algorithm’s decision is easy to understand, and it is
possible to determine which factors the algorithm has placed most weight on. |
427 |
19.0% |
0.1902004 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_dmaicx
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you believe that the current system for sentencing is
fair?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sentencing in the courts involves determining the punishment a person
should receive if they are found guilty of a crime. This includes
deciding what type of punishment should be given, as well as how long it
should last. Currently, judges themselves make these decisions based on
the maximum penalty set by the Storting and based on the punishments
that have been handed down in similar cases in the past.
[r31_dmaicx_ran]
Generally speaking, to what extent do you think this system is fair?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
85 |
3.8% |
0.03786192 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
519 |
23.1% |
0.23118040 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
862 |
38.4% |
0.38396437 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
467 |
20.8% |
0.20801782 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
289 |
12.9% |
0.12873051 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.0% |
0.01024499 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_cppus_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The provision of public services where I live is good
enough.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The prerequisites for public services appear to be quite different in
different parts of Norway. On this basis, what are your views on the
following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The provision of public services where I live is good enough.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
209 |
9.3% |
0.09309577 |
| 2 |
Agree |
789 |
35.1% |
0.35144766 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
532 |
23.7% |
0.23697105 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
171 |
7.6% |
0.07616927 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
270 |
12.0% |
0.12026726 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
184 |
8.2% |
0.08195991 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
55 |
2.4% |
0.02449889 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.6% |
0.01559020 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_cppus_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Those living in scattered areas/in smaller communities
must be prepared for poorer access to services.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The prerequisites for public services appear to be quite different in
different parts of Norway. On this basis, what are your views on the
following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Those living in scattered areas/in smaller communities must be prepared
for poorer access to services.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
107 |
4.8% |
0.04766147 |
| 2 |
Agree |
377 |
16.8% |
0.16792873 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
633 |
28.2% |
0.28195991 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
148 |
6.6% |
0.06592428 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
363 |
16.2% |
0.16169265 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
384 |
17.1% |
0.17104677 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
193 |
8.6% |
0.08596882 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
1.8% |
0.01781737 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_cppus_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Services should be available near people, even when it
costs more.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The prerequisites for public services appear to be quite different in
different parts of Norway. On this basis, what are your views on the
following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Services should be available near people, even when it costs more.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
283 |
12.6% |
0.12605791 |
| 2 |
Agree |
670 |
29.8% |
0.29844098 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
614 |
27.3% |
0.27349666 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
206 |
9.2% |
0.09175947 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
299 |
13.3% |
0.13318486 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
104 |
4.6% |
0.04632517 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
36 |
1.6% |
0.01603563 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.5% |
0.01469933 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_cehod
|
Variable label:
|
Have you previously experienced damage to your home and/or land as a
result of heavy rain?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you previously experienced damage to your home and/or land as a
result of heavy rain?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
315 |
14.0% |
0.14031180 |
| 2 |
No |
1874 |
83.5% |
0.83474388 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
31 |
1.4% |
0.01380846 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.1% |
0.01113586 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_cehow2
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of concern that extreme weather or consequences of climate change
will cause damage to your home.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Climate change is likely to bring more rain and flooding, rising sea
levels and more landslides/avalanches in Norway.
Are you worried that extreme weather or the consequences of climate
change will cause damage to your home and/or land?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very worried |
51 |
2.3% |
0.02271715 |
| 2 |
Worried |
245 |
10.9% |
0.10913140 |
| 3 |
Somewhat worried |
597 |
26.6% |
0.26592428 |
| 4 |
Not very worried |
990 |
44.1% |
0.44097996 |
| 5 |
Not at all worried |
338 |
15.1% |
0.15055679 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.1% |
0.01069042 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_cesfex_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_cesfex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2223] [Invalid:9292]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
If the charge is introduced, private individuals, housing cooperatives and
co-owners can apply for money for solutions, such as rain gardens or open
ditches, in order to deal with heavy rain. |
1161 |
52.2% |
0.5222672 |
| 2 |
BLANK |
1062 |
47.8% |
0.4777328 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9292 |
|
NA |
r31_cesfex
|
Variable label:
|
Where do you stand on homeowners in your municipality having to pay an
annual fee to handle heavy rain through ditches, rainbeds, and similar?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Heavy rain can be dealt with by having ditches and rain gardens which
can both prevent damage and provide more green spaces. The
municipality’s water and sewerage charges cannot be used to pay for
this. If damage caused by heavy rain is not limited, home insurance
could become more expensive in the future.
Imagine that municipalities are able to impose a charge which home
owners will have to pay based on how much water flows from their
properties (surface water charge). For a normal detached house this
charge could be between NOK 500 and NOK 1000 per year. The money would
be spent on solutions for dealing with heavy rain.
[r31_cesfex_ran]
Image 1: Flooding due to heavy rain Photo: Frank Tinmannsvik
Image 2: Rain garden Photo: Bent Braskerud / Oslo-VAV
What do you think about home owners in your municipality having to pay
an annual charge in order to deal with heavy rain by having ditches and
rain gardens, etc?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly in favour |
313 |
13.9% |
0.13942094 |
| 2 |
Partly in favour |
733 |
32.7% |
0.32650334 |
| 3 |
Neither for nor against |
326 |
14.5% |
0.14521158 |
| 4 |
Somewhat against |
333 |
14.8% |
0.14832962 |
| 5 |
Strongly against |
406 |
18.1% |
0.18084633 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
111 |
4.9% |
0.04944321 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.0% |
0.01024499 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_cesfpx
|
Variable label:
|
Fee for handling heavy rain’s impact on damages
|
|
Literal question:
|
If homeowners in your municipality pay an annual charge for dealing with
heavy rain, to what extent do you think this would help to limit any
damage?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
49 |
2.2% |
0.02182628 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
306 |
13.6% |
0.13630290 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
906 |
40.4% |
0.40356347 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
560 |
24.9% |
0.24944321 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
228 |
10.2% |
0.10155902 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
159 |
7.1% |
0.07082405 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
1.6% |
0.01648107 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_cesfsx
|
Variable label:
|
Fee for handling heavy rain’s impact on the household
|
|
Literal question:
|
If homeowners in your municipality pay an annual charge for dealing with
heavy rain, how do you think this would affect your household? Please
consider both the charge and the damage avoided.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
32 |
1.4% |
0.01425390 |
| 2 |
Positively |
468 |
20.8% |
0.20846325 |
| 3 |
No influence |
1055 |
47.0% |
0.46993318 |
| 4 |
Negatively |
351 |
15.6% |
0.15634744 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
94 |
4.2% |
0.04187082 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
200 |
8.9% |
0.08908686 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
2.0% |
0.02004454 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_cesfox
|
Variable label:
|
Fee for handling heavy rain’s impact on households with low income
|
|
Literal question:
|
If homeowners in your municipality pay an annual charge for dealing with
heavy rain, how do you think this would affect low-income households?
Please consider both the charge and the damage avoided.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
19 |
0.8% |
0.008463252 |
| 2 |
Positively |
368 |
16.4% |
0.163919822 |
| 3 |
No influence |
244 |
10.9% |
0.108685969 |
| 4 |
Negatively |
980 |
43.7% |
0.436525612 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
359 |
16.0% |
0.159910913 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
225 |
10.0% |
0.100222717 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
2.2% |
0.022271715 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_plhom
|
Variable label:
|
What is your living situation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your living situation?
|
|
Post-question:
|
In this context we are thinking about your primary residence.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I live in a detached house |
1134 |
50.5% |
0.50512249 |
| 2 |
I live in semi-detached/multi-family house, terraced house or another type of
small house |
480 |
21.4% |
0.21380846 |
| 3 |
I live in an apartment building or a block of flats |
552 |
24.6% |
0.24587973 |
| 4 |
Other: |
48 |
2.1% |
0.02138085 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.4% |
0.01380846 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_plhom_4_other
|
Variable label:
|
What is your living situation: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your living situation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Post-question:
|
In this context we are thinking about your primary residence.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:11515] [Range:-]
|
r31_plhow
|
Variable label:
|
Do you own or rent your primary residence?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you own or rent your primary residence?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I own my home, in full or in part |
1902 |
84.7% |
0.84721604 |
| 2 |
I am renting my home |
237 |
10.6% |
0.10556793 |
| 3 |
Other: |
69 |
3.1% |
0.03073497 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
1.6% |
0.01648107 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_plhow_3_other
|
Variable label:
|
Do you own or rent your primary residence?: Other:
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you own or rent your primary residence?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0]
[Invalid:11515] [Range:-]
|
r31_cecpax
|
Variable label:
|
Confidence in public authorities
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you have confidence in the public authorities?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
148 |
6.6% |
0.065924276 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
1070 |
47.7% |
0.476614699 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
731 |
32.6% |
0.325612472 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
209 |
9.3% |
0.093095768 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
55 |
2.4% |
0.024498886 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001336303 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.3% |
0.012917595 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_lgcsix_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_lgcsix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been
exposed to [r30_lgcsix]]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1893] [Invalid:9622]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
woman |
972 |
51.3% |
0.5134707 |
| 2 |
man |
921 |
48.7% |
0.4865293 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9622 |
|
NA |
r31_lgcsix_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: [The man/woman] has done something wrong/morally
problematic.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a [r31_lgcsix_ran] accompanies a [man/woman] home from a
nightclub and falls asleep in [his/hers] bed. [She/He] is awoken by
[him/her] touching [her/him]. [She/He] says no, but doesn’t push
[him/her] away. It ends with them having sexual intercourse.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
[The man/woman] has done something wrong/morally problematic.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_lgcsix_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: [The man/woman]’s actions should be punished by
imprisonment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a [r31_lgcsix_ran] accompanies a [man/woman] home from a
nightclub and falls asleep in [his/hers] bed. [She/He] is awoken by
[him/her] touching [her/him]. [She/He] says no, but doesn’t push
[him/her] away. It ends with them having sexual intercourse.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
[The man/woman]’s actions should be punished by imprisonment.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_lgcsix_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Regardless of what the current law is, I believe that
[the man/women]’s actions should be defined as rape.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a [r31_lgcsix_ran] accompanies a [man/woman] home from a
nightclub and falls asleep in [his/hers] bed. [She/He] is awoken by
[him/her] touching [her/him]. [She/He] says no, but doesn’t push
[him/her] away. It ends with them having sexual intercourse.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Regardless of what the current law is, I believe that [the man/woman]’s
actions should be defined as rape.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_lgcsix_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I believe that [the man/women]’s actions are defined as
rape according to current legislation.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a [r31_lgcsix_ran] accompanies a [man/woman] home from a
nightclub and falls asleep in [his/hers] bed. [She/He] is awoken by
[him/her] touching [her/him]. [She/He] says no, but doesn’t push
[him/her] away. It ends with them having sexual intercourse.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I believe that [the man/woman]’s actions are defined as rape according
to current legislation.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_lgcbex
|
Variable label:
|
How important do you think it is to ensure clear consent (words or
actions) before sex?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think it is to ensure clear consent (words or
actions) before sex?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_lgcop_1
|
Variable label:
|
What percentage of women/men in Norway do you think would answer
‘important’ or ‘very important’ to the question above: Women
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What percentage of women/men in the Norwegian population do you think
would answer ‘important’ or ‘very important’ to the question above?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Women:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_lgcop_2
|
Variable label:
|
What percentage of women/men in Norway do you think would answer
‘important’ or ‘very important’ to the question above: Men
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What percentage of women/men in the Norwegian population do you think
would answer ‘important’ or ‘very important’ to the question above?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Men:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_lgcsu_1
|
Variable label:
|
In which of the following situations do you believe that consent to have
sex has been given by the other person: The other person nods their
head.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which of the following situations do you believe that consent to have
sex has been given by the other person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The other person nods their head.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_lgcsu_2
|
Variable label:
|
In which of the following situations do you believe that consent to have
sex has been given by the other person: The other person take off their
clothes.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which of the following situations do you believe that consent to have
sex has been given by the other person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The other person takes off their clothes.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_lgcsu_3
|
Variable label:
|
In which of the following situations do you believe that consent to have
sex has been given by the other person: The other person does nothing to
stop you.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which of the following situations do you believe that consent to have
sex has been given by the other person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The other person does nothing to stop you
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_lgcsu_4
|
Variable label:
|
In which of the following situations do you believe that consent to have
sex has been given by the other person: The other person kisses and
touches you.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which of the following situations do you believe that consent to have
sex has been given by the other person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The other person kisses and touches you
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_lgcsu_5
|
Variable label:
|
In which of the following situations do you believe that consent to have
sex has been given by the other person: The other person does not say
no.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which of the following situations do you believe that consent to have
sex has been given by the other person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The other person does not say no.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_lgcsu_6
|
Variable label:
|
In which of the following situations do you believe that consent to have
sex has been given by the other person: None of these.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which of the following situations do you believe that consent to have
sex has been given by the other person?
|
|
Literal question:
|
None of these
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4) and if the respondent has not been exposed
to [r30_lgcsix]]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_wo80px_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_wo80px].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2209] [Invalid:9306]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
still receive 100% pay |
1083 |
49.0% |
0.4902671 |
| 2 |
receive 90% pay |
1126 |
51.0% |
0.5097329 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9306 |
|
NA |
r31_wo80px_pipe
|
Variable label:
|
Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_wo80pxo2] based on
[r31_wo80px_ran].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_wo80px_ran] = 1 the value is set to 1. If [r31_wo80px_ran] =
2 the value is set to 2.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2209] [Invalid:9306]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
100 |
1083 |
49.0% |
0.4902671 |
| 2 |
90 |
1126 |
51.0% |
0.5097329 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9306 |
|
NA |
r31_wo80px
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative: Working 80%
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you work full time. Your employer provides you with the
opportunity to work 80%, but you would [r31_wo80px_ran]. How positive or
negative are you about this?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
799 |
35.6% |
0.35590200 |
| 2 |
Positive |
636 |
28.3% |
0.28329621 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
315 |
14.0% |
0.14031180 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
156 |
6.9% |
0.06948775 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
94 |
4.2% |
0.04187082 |
| 6 |
Negative |
145 |
6.5% |
0.06458797 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
58 |
2.6% |
0.02583519 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
1.9% |
0.01870824 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_wo80pxo2_pipe
|
Variable label:
|
Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_wo80pxo2] based on
[r31_wo80px_ran].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_wo80px] = 5 the value is set to 5. If [r31_wo80px] = 6 the
value is set to 6. If [r31_wo80px] = 7 the value is set to 7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:312] [Invalid:11203]
[Range:5-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 5 |
somewhat negative |
100 |
32.1% |
0.3205128 |
| 6 |
negative |
154 |
49.4% |
0.4935897 |
| 7 |
very negative |
58 |
18.6% |
0.1858974 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11203 |
|
NA |
r31_wo80pxo1
|
Variable label:
|
What would you use the extra time for?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reduced working hours free up time for other activities. If this became
a reality for you, what would you do in your extra time?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses
are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if
you prefer.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_wo80px = 1, 2, 3, 4) & (r31_group = 4)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_wo80pxo2
|
Variable label:
|
Explanation for the attitude towards working 80%
|
|
Literal question:
|
You have said you are [r31_wo80pxo2_pipe] to working 80% with
[r31_wo80px_pipe]% paid wages. What is the reason for this?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All types of responses
are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if
you prefer.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_wo80px = 5, 6, 7) & (r31_group = 4)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_worhdx
|
Variable label:
|
Shorter working days or fewer days per week
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were required to work 80%, would you prefer working:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Shorter working days (and the same number of days per week) |
375 |
16.7% |
0.16703786 |
| 2 |
Fewer days per week |
1809 |
80.6% |
0.80579065 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
61 |
2.7% |
0.02717149 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_worwhx_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would a reduced working hours arrangement: resulted in a
better balance between my working life and my personal life.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would a reduced working hours arrangement…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…resulted in a better balance between my working life and my personal
life.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
590 |
26.3% |
0.26280624 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
674 |
30.0% |
0.30022272 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
577 |
25.7% |
0.25701559 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
217 |
9.7% |
0.09665924 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
115 |
5.1% |
0.05122494 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
3.2% |
0.03207127 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_worwhx_2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would a reduced working hours arrangement: allowed me to
stay at work longer.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would a reduced working hours arrangement…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… allowed me to stay at work longer.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
396 |
17.6% |
0.17639198 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
573 |
25.5% |
0.25523385 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
611 |
27.2% |
0.27216036 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
365 |
16.3% |
0.16258352 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
216 |
9.6% |
0.09621381 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
84 |
3.7% |
0.03741648 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_worwhx_3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would a reduced working hours arrangement: made it easier
for me to live in an environmentally friendly manner.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would a reduced working hours arrangement…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… made it easier for me to live in an environmentally friendly manner.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
136 |
6.1% |
0.06057906 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
247 |
11.0% |
0.11002227 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
599 |
26.7% |
0.26681514 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
594 |
26.5% |
0.26458797 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
569 |
25.3% |
0.25345212 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
100 |
4.5% |
0.04454343 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_worwhx_4
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent would a reduced working hours arrangement: made it easier
for me to use a car less.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would a reduced working hours arrangement…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… made it easier for me to use a car less.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 4)]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
195 |
8.7% |
0.08685969 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
294 |
13.1% |
0.13095768 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
523 |
23.3% |
0.23296214 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
487 |
21.7% |
0.21692650 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
649 |
28.9% |
0.28908686 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
97 |
4.3% |
0.04320713 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9270 |
|
NA |
r31_ecred
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The government should redistribute income from the
better-off to those who are less well-off
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent you agree or disagree with the following statement: The
government should redistribute income from the better-off to those who
are less well-off
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
404 |
17.7% |
0.17719298 |
| 2 |
Agree |
523 |
22.9% |
0.22938596 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
614 |
26.9% |
0.26929825 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
243 |
10.7% |
0.10657895 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
223 |
9.8% |
0.09780702 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
181 |
7.9% |
0.07938596 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
72 |
3.2% |
0.03157895 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.9% |
0.00877193 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_ecsem
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The state should work to strengthen private
entrepreneurship and the market economy.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent you agree or disagree with the following statement: The
government should work to strengthen private entrepreneurship and the
market economy
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
389 |
17.1% |
0.170614035 |
| 2 |
Agree |
563 |
24.7% |
0.246929825 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
569 |
25.0% |
0.249561404 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
365 |
16.0% |
0.160087719 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
195 |
8.6% |
0.085526316 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
131 |
5.7% |
0.057456140 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
47 |
2.1% |
0.020614035 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.9% |
0.009210526 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_cpbupx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_cpbupx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2280] [Invalid:9235]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
rural areas. |
418 |
18.3% |
0.1833333 |
| 2 |
places in rural areas that have experienced depopulation. |
367 |
16.1% |
0.1609649 |
| 3 |
places in rural areas where many people live in poverty. |
371 |
16.3% |
0.1627193 |
| 4 |
cities. |
369 |
16.2% |
0.1618421 |
| 5 |
cities where many people live in poverty. |
380 |
16.7% |
0.1666667 |
| 6 |
cities where many people live in poverty and where many immigrants also live. |
375 |
16.4% |
0.1644737 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_cpbupx
|
Variable label:
|
Good/bad: The state should reprioritize so that a larger portion of the
public budget goes to [r31_cpbupx_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad do you think the following proposal is:
The government should reprioritize so that a larger part of the public
budget goes to [r31_cpbupx_ran]
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
179 |
7.9% |
0.078508772 |
| 2 |
Good |
469 |
20.6% |
0.205701754 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
620 |
27.2% |
0.271929825 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
450 |
19.7% |
0.197368421 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
306 |
13.4% |
0.134210526 |
| 6 |
Bad |
167 |
7.3% |
0.073245614 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
82 |
3.6% |
0.035964912 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003070175 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dmhsyx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dmhsyx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2280] [Invalid:9235]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
criticize |
1091 |
47.9% |
0.4785088 |
| 2 |
degrade |
1189 |
52.1% |
0.5214912 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dmhsyx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dmhsyx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2280] [Invalid:9235]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Muslims |
774 |
33.9% |
0.3394737 |
| 2 |
Jews |
742 |
32.5% |
0.3254386 |
| 3 |
Christians |
764 |
33.5% |
0.3350877 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dmhsyx
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on the scale: symbols that are sacred
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please place yourself on the scale below where
0 means that people who [r31_dmhsyx_ran1] symbols that are sacred to
[r31_dmhsyx_ran2] should continue doing so if they want to, because we
live in a democracy with freedom of speech. 10 means that people who
[r31_dmhsyx_ran1] symbols that are sacred to [r31_dmhsyx_ran2] should
stop doing so, because they should show respect for people’s religious
beliefs.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Continue |
210 |
9.2% |
0.092105263 |
| 1 |
1 |
65 |
2.9% |
0.028508772 |
| 2 |
2 |
118 |
5.2% |
0.051754386 |
| 3 |
3 |
115 |
5.0% |
0.050438596 |
| 4 |
4 |
91 |
4.0% |
0.039912281 |
| 5 |
5 |
353 |
15.5% |
0.154824561 |
| 6 |
6 |
102 |
4.5% |
0.044736842 |
| 7 |
7 |
167 |
7.3% |
0.073245614 |
| 8 |
8 |
250 |
11.0% |
0.109649123 |
| 9 |
9 |
130 |
5.7% |
0.057017544 |
| 10 |
10 - Stop |
664 |
29.1% |
0.291228070 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.7% |
0.006578947 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvmsax_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvmsax].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2280] [Invalid:9235]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
hospitals |
1067 |
46.8% |
0.4679825 |
| 2 |
prisons |
1213 |
53.2% |
0.5320175 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvmsax_pipe1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvmsax] based on
[r31_dvmsax_ran1].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_dvmsax_ran1] = 1 the value is set to 1. If [r31_dvmsax_ran1] =
2 the value is set to 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2280] [Invalid:9235]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
patients |
1067 |
46.8% |
0.4679825 |
| 2 |
inmates |
1213 |
53.2% |
0.5320175 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvmsax_pipe2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvmsax] based on
[r31_dvmsax_ran1].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_dvmsax_ran1] = 1 the value is set to 1. If [r31_dvmsax_ran1] =
2 the value is set to 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2280] [Invalid:9235]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
patients |
1067 |
46.8% |
0.4679825 |
| 2 |
inmates |
1213 |
53.2% |
0.5320175 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvmsax_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvmsax].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2280] [Invalid:9235]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
723 |
31.7% |
0.3171053 |
| 2 |
trained at a domestic institution of higher education |
761 |
33.4% |
0.3337719 |
| 3 |
trained abroad in a country where Islam is the main religion |
796 |
34.9% |
0.3491228 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvmsax
|
Variable label:
|
Trust/distrust in Muslim councillors (chaplains)
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some [r31_dvmsax_ran1] have councilors whose job is to meet the
spiritual needs of [r31_dvmsax_pipe1]. How much do you trust or distrust
Muslim councillors (chaplains) [r31_dvmsax_ran2] to offer appropriate
spiritual guidance to Muslim [r31_dvmsax_pipe2]?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Trust very much |
103 |
4.5% |
0.045175439 |
| 2 |
Trust |
505 |
22.1% |
0.221491228 |
| 3 |
Trust somewhat |
341 |
15.0% |
0.149561404 |
| 4 |
Neither trust nor distrust |
791 |
34.7% |
0.346929825 |
| 5 |
Distrust somewhat |
212 |
9.3% |
0.092982456 |
| 6 |
Distrust |
155 |
6.8% |
0.067982456 |
| 7 |
Distrust very much |
161 |
7.1% |
0.070614035 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.5% |
0.005263158 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dmimp2_1
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative an impact do you think the following have on
social development: The green movement
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your own view, does the following have mainly a positive or mainly
a negative societal impact?
The green movement
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dmimp2_2], [r31_dmimp2_3],
[r31_dmimp2_4], [r31_dmimp2_5].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
270 |
11.8% |
0.11842105 |
| 2 |
Positive |
654 |
28.7% |
0.28684211 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
606 |
26.6% |
0.26578947 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
223 |
9.8% |
0.09780702 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
227 |
10.0% |
0.09956140 |
| 6 |
Negative |
145 |
6.4% |
0.06359649 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
130 |
5.7% |
0.05701754 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.1% |
0.01096491 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dmimp2_2
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative an impact do you think the following have on
social development: Feminism
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your own view, does the following have mainly a positive or mainly
a negative societal impact?
Feminism
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dmimp2_1], [r31_dmimp2_3],
[r31_dmimp2_4], [r31_dmimp2_5].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
285 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
| 2 |
Positive |
641 |
28.1% |
0.28114035 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
553 |
24.3% |
0.24254386 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
418 |
18.3% |
0.18333333 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
199 |
8.7% |
0.08728070 |
| 6 |
Negative |
117 |
5.1% |
0.05131579 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
47 |
2.1% |
0.02061404 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.9% |
0.00877193 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dmimp2_3
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative an impact do you think the following have on
social development: Immigration
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your own view, does the following have mainly a positive or mainly
a negative societal impact?
Immigration
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dmimp2_1], [r31_dmimp2_2],
[r31_dmimp2_4], [r31_dmimp2_5].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
51 |
2.2% |
0.022368421 |
| 2 |
Positive |
395 |
17.3% |
0.173245614 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
739 |
32.4% |
0.324122807 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
304 |
13.3% |
0.133333333 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
444 |
19.5% |
0.194736842 |
| 6 |
Negative |
221 |
9.7% |
0.096929825 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
108 |
4.7% |
0.047368421 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007894737 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dmimp2_4
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative an impact do you think the following have on
social development: EU (the European Union)
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your own view, does the following have mainly a positive or mainly
a negative societal impact?
The EU (European Union)
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dmimp2_1], [r31_dmimp2_2],
[r31_dmimp2_3], [r31_dmimp2_5].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
94 |
4.1% |
0.041228070 |
| 2 |
Positive |
470 |
20.6% |
0.206140351 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
596 |
26.1% |
0.261403509 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
435 |
19.1% |
0.190789474 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
356 |
15.6% |
0.156140351 |
| 6 |
Negative |
196 |
8.6% |
0.085964912 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
118 |
5.2% |
0.051754386 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.7% |
0.006578947 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dmimp2_5
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative an impact do you think the following have on
social development: Our contry’s Christian cultural heritage
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your own view, does the following have mainly a positive or mainly
a negative societal impact?
Our country’s Christian cultural heritage
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dmimp2_1], [r31_dmimp2_2],
[r31_dmimp2_3], [r31_dmimp2_4].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
192 |
8.4% |
0.084210526 |
| 2 |
Positive |
509 |
22.3% |
0.223245614 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
563 |
24.7% |
0.246929825 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
596 |
26.1% |
0.261403509 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
257 |
11.3% |
0.112719298 |
| 6 |
Negative |
102 |
4.5% |
0.044736842 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
40 |
1.8% |
0.017543860 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.9% |
0.009210526 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvretx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvretx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2280] [Invalid:9235]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
from Ukraine |
747 |
32.8% |
0.3276316 |
| 2 |
from non-European countries |
806 |
35.4% |
0.3535088 |
| 3 |
BLANK |
727 |
31.9% |
0.3188596 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvretx
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norway should make its immigration policy stricter when
it comes to refugees [r31_dvretx_ran]?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should tighten immigration
policy regarding refugees [r31_dvretx_ran]?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
340 |
14.9% |
0.149122807 |
| 2 |
Agree |
374 |
16.4% |
0.164035088 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
578 |
25.4% |
0.253508772 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
318 |
13.9% |
0.139473684 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
355 |
15.6% |
0.155701754 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
228 |
10.0% |
0.100000000 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
81 |
3.6% |
0.035526316 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002631579 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvreix
|
Variable label:
|
How easy or difficult would you say it is to integrate refugees
[r31_dvretx_ran] in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How easy or difficult would you say it is to integrate refugees
[r31_dvretx_ran] in Norway?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very easy |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007894737 |
| 2 |
Easy |
124 |
5.4% |
0.054385965 |
| 3 |
Somewhat easy |
239 |
10.5% |
0.104824561 |
| 4 |
Neither easy nor difficult |
352 |
15.4% |
0.154385965 |
| 5 |
Somewhat difficult |
794 |
34.8% |
0.348245614 |
| 6 |
Difficult |
570 |
25.0% |
0.250000000 |
| 7 |
Very difficult |
167 |
7.3% |
0.073245614 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.7% |
0.007017544 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_ce2orx_1_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r31_ce2orx_1].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2276] [Invalid:9239]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It should be cheaper to travel by public transport |
1165 |
51.2% |
0.5118629 |
| 2 |
Fossil fuels (gasoline/diesel) should become more expensive |
1111 |
48.8% |
0.4881371 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9239 |
|
NA |
r31_ce2orx_2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r31_ce2orx_2].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2276] [Invalid:9239]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Food with a high climate footprint should be more expensive, while food with a
low climate footprint should be cheaper |
1116 |
49.0% |
0.4903339 |
| 2 |
Red meat should be more expensive, while plant-based food should be cheaper |
1160 |
51.0% |
0.5096661 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9239 |
|
NA |
r31_ce2orx_3_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r31_ce2orx_3].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2276] [Invalid:9239]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
offshore |
1062 |
46.7% |
0.4666081 |
| 2 |
onshore |
1214 |
53.3% |
0.5333919 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9239 |
|
NA |
r31_ce2orx_4_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in
[r31_ce2orx_4].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2276] [Invalid:9239]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
More solar panels should be installed on houses |
1152 |
50.6% |
0.5061511 |
| 2 |
More solar power plants should be built |
1124 |
49.4% |
0.4938489 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9239 |
|
NA |
r31_dv2orx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dv2orx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2276] [Invalid:9239]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
no longer serve meals with meat to slow down climate change |
548 |
24.1% |
0.2407733 |
| 2 |
add meals without meat to slow down climate change |
574 |
25.2% |
0.2521968 |
| 3 |
no longer serve meals with pork to be considerate of Muslim religious rules |
564 |
24.8% |
0.2478032 |
| 4 |
add meals without pork to be considerate of Muslim religious rules |
590 |
25.9% |
0.2592267 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9239 |
|
NA |
r31_ce2orx_1
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of Norwegians’ views on [r31_ce2orx_1_ran].
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your assessment of Norwegians’ views on this?
[r31_ce2orx_1_ran].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_ce2orx_2], [r31_ce2orx_3],
[r31_ce2orx_4].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Almost everyone agrees (85% or more agree) |
472 |
20.7% |
0.207017544 |
| 2 |
Most people agree (Between 70% and 85% agree) |
502 |
22.0% |
0.220175439 |
| 3 |
They lean towards agree (Between 55% and 70% agree) |
259 |
11.4% |
0.113596491 |
| 4 |
The population is divided (Between 45% and 55% agree) |
309 |
13.6% |
0.135526316 |
| 5 |
They lean towards disagree (Between 30% and 45% agree) |
302 |
13.2% |
0.132456140 |
| 6 |
Most people disagree (Between 15% and 30% agree) |
302 |
13.2% |
0.132456140 |
| 7 |
Almost everyone disagrees (15% or less agree) |
119 |
5.2% |
0.052192982 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.7% |
0.006578947 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_ce2orx_2
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of Norwegians’ views on [r31_ce2orx_2_ran].
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your assessment of Norwegians’ views on this?
[r31_ce2orx_2_ran].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_ce2orx_1], [r31_ce2orx_3],
[r31_ce2orx_4].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Almost everyone agrees (85% or more agree) |
33 |
1.4% |
0.014473684 |
| 2 |
Most people agree (Between 70% and 85% agree) |
153 |
6.7% |
0.067105263 |
| 3 |
They lean towards agree (Between 55% and 70% agree) |
340 |
14.9% |
0.149122807 |
| 4 |
The population is divided (Between 45% and 55% agree) |
733 |
32.1% |
0.321491228 |
| 5 |
They lean towards disagree (Between 30% and 45% agree) |
521 |
22.9% |
0.228508772 |
| 6 |
Most people disagree (Between 15% and 30% agree) |
365 |
16.0% |
0.160087719 |
| 7 |
Almost everyone disagrees (15% or less agree) |
119 |
5.2% |
0.052192982 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.7% |
0.007017544 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_ce2orx_3
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of Norwegians’ views: More wind power should be developed
[r31_ce2orx_3_ran] in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your assessment of Norwegians’ views on this?
More [r31_ce2orx_3_ran] wind power should be developed in Norway.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_ce2orx_1], [r31_ce2orx_2],
[r31_ce2orx_4].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Almost everyone agrees (85% or more agree) |
32 |
1.4% |
0.014035088 |
| 2 |
Most people agree (Between 70% and 85% agree) |
114 |
5.0% |
0.050000000 |
| 3 |
They lean towards agree (Between 55% and 70% agree) |
316 |
13.9% |
0.138596491 |
| 4 |
The population is divided (Between 45% and 55% agree) |
621 |
27.2% |
0.272368421 |
| 5 |
They lean towards disagree (Between 30% and 45% agree) |
561 |
24.6% |
0.246052632 |
| 6 |
Most people disagree (Between 15% and 30% agree) |
458 |
20.1% |
0.200877193 |
| 7 |
Almost everyone disagrees (15% or less agree) |
163 |
7.1% |
0.071491228 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.7% |
0.006578947 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_ce2orx_4
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of Norwegians’ views: It should [r31_ce2orx_4_ran].
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your assessment of Norwegians’ views on this?
[r31_ce2orx_4_ran].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_ce2orx_1], [r31_ce2orx_2],
[r31_ce2orx_3].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Almost everyone agrees (85% or more agree) |
118 |
5.2% |
0.051754386 |
| 2 |
Most people agree (Between 70% and 85% agree) |
451 |
19.8% |
0.197807018 |
| 3 |
They lean towards agree (Between 55% and 70% agree) |
673 |
29.5% |
0.295175439 |
| 4 |
The population is divided (Between 45% and 55% agree) |
623 |
27.3% |
0.273245614 |
| 5 |
They lean towards disagree (Between 30% and 45% agree) |
242 |
10.6% |
0.106140351 |
| 6 |
Most people disagree (Between 15% and 30% agree) |
125 |
5.5% |
0.054824561 |
| 7 |
Almost everyone disagrees (15% or less agree) |
32 |
1.4% |
0.014035088 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.7% |
0.007017544 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_ce2orx_order
|
Variable label:
|
Shows the order in which [r31_ce2orx_1], [r31_ce2orx_2], [r31_ce2orx_3]
og[r31_ce2orx_4] were displayed.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2274] [Invalid:9241]
[Range:-]
|
r31_dv2orx
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of Norwegians’ views on: Some people suggest that canteens
[r31_dv2orx_ran].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some people propose that canteens [r31_dv2orx_ran].
What is your assessment of Norwegians’ views on this?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Almost everyone agrees (85% or more agree) |
17 |
0.7% |
0.007456140 |
| 2 |
Most people agree (Between 70% and 85% agree) |
66 |
2.9% |
0.028947368 |
| 3 |
They lean towards agree (Between 55% and 70% agree) |
167 |
7.3% |
0.073245614 |
| 4 |
The population is divided (Between 45% and 55% agree) |
360 |
15.8% |
0.157894737 |
| 5 |
They lean towards disagree (Between 30% and 45% agree) |
484 |
21.2% |
0.212280702 |
| 6 |
Most people disagree (Between 15% and 30% agree) |
737 |
32.3% |
0.323245614 |
| 7 |
Almost everyone disagrees (15% or less agree) |
428 |
18.8% |
0.187719298 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.9% |
0.009210526 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_cpidp
|
Variable label:
|
Feel more like a rural or urban person
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself on the scale below, what do you feel most
like:
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Very strongly as a rural person |
76 |
3.3% |
0.033333333 |
| 1 |
1 |
73 |
3.2% |
0.032017544 |
| 2 |
2 |
118 |
5.2% |
0.051754386 |
| 3 |
3 |
159 |
7.0% |
0.069736842 |
| 4 |
4 |
187 |
8.2% |
0.082017544 |
| 5 |
5 - As much a rural person as an urban person |
584 |
25.6% |
0.256140351 |
| 6 |
6 |
204 |
8.9% |
0.089473684 |
| 7 |
7 |
285 |
12.5% |
0.125000000 |
| 8 |
8 |
293 |
12.9% |
0.128508772 |
| 9 |
9 |
136 |
6.0% |
0.059649123 |
| 10 |
10 - Very strongly as an urban person |
147 |
6.4% |
0.064473684 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007894737 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_cprre
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Politicians don’t pay enough attention to people living
outside big cities when designing policies.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Politicians don’t pay enough attention to people living outside big
cities when designing policies.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
277 |
12.1% |
0.12149123 |
| 2 |
Agree |
443 |
19.4% |
0.19429825 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
619 |
27.1% |
0.27149123 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
317 |
13.9% |
0.13903509 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
274 |
12.0% |
0.12017544 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
242 |
10.6% |
0.10614035 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
84 |
3.7% |
0.03684211 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.1% |
0.01052632 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvfhcx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvfhcx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2263] [Invalid:9252]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
who live in Norway |
761 |
33.6% |
0.3362793 |
| 2 |
who live in Norway, including immigrants |
742 |
32.8% |
0.3278833 |
| 3 |
immigrants who live in Norway |
760 |
33.6% |
0.3358374 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9252 |
|
NA |
r31_dvfhcx
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Health care should be free for all [r31_dvfhcx_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Healthcare should be free for all [r31_dvfhcx_ran], even if that means
the government has to increase taxes for most working families.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
246 |
10.8% |
0.10789474 |
| 2 |
Agree |
549 |
24.1% |
0.24078947 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
491 |
21.5% |
0.21535088 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
220 |
9.6% |
0.09649123 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
331 |
14.5% |
0.14517544 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
255 |
11.2% |
0.11184211 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
160 |
7.0% |
0.07017544 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.01228070 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvfacx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvfacx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2263] [Invalid:9252]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
families with primary school children who live in Norway |
775 |
34.2% |
0.3424658 |
| 2 |
families with primary school children who live in Norway, including immigrants |
752 |
33.2% |
0.3323023 |
| 3 |
immigrant families with primary school children who live in Norway |
736 |
32.5% |
0.3252320 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9252 |
|
NA |
r31_dvfacx
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: After-school childcare (SFO) should be free for all
[r31_dvfacx_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
After-school childcare should be available and free for all
[r31_dvfacx_ran], even if that means the government has to increase
taxes for most working families.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
198 |
8.7% |
0.08684211 |
| 2 |
Agree |
459 |
20.1% |
0.20131579 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
487 |
21.4% |
0.21359649 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
278 |
12.2% |
0.12192982 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
380 |
16.7% |
0.16666667 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
263 |
11.5% |
0.11535088 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
185 |
8.1% |
0.08114035 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01315789 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvbuix_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvbuix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2262] [Invalid:9253]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
1121 |
49.6% |
0.4955791 |
| 2 |
A local government in Norway |
1141 |
50.4% |
0.5044209 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9253 |
|
NA |
r31_dvbuix_pipe1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvbuix] based on
[r31_dvbuix_ran1].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_dvbuix_ran1] = 1 the value is set to 1. If [r31_dvbuix_ran1] =
2 the value is set to 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2262] [Invalid:9253]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
a centrally located church |
1121 |
49.6% |
0.4955791 |
| 2 |
a centrally located public building |
1141 |
50.4% |
0.5044209 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9253 |
|
NA |
r31_dvbuix_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvbuix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2262] [Invalid:9253]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
a hotel run by a multinational commercial company |
732 |
32.4% |
0.3236074 |
| 2 |
a mosque |
771 |
34.1% |
0.3408488 |
| 3 |
a mosque funded by a foreign Muslim organization |
759 |
33.6% |
0.3355438 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9253 |
|
NA |
r31_dvbuix
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative towards the proposal for conversion of buildings
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the following situation:
[r31_dvbuix_ran1] has been debating whether or not to sell some
buildings. A proposal has now been made that involves [r31_dvbuix_pipe1]
being sold and converted into [r31_dvbuix_ran2].
How positive or negative are you to this proposal?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
56 |
2.5% |
0.02456140 |
| 2 |
Positive |
198 |
8.7% |
0.08684211 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
198 |
8.7% |
0.08684211 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
547 |
24.0% |
0.23991228 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
321 |
14.1% |
0.14078947 |
| 6 |
Negative |
430 |
18.9% |
0.18859649 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
507 |
22.2% |
0.22236842 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.0% |
0.01008772 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dmfspx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dmfspx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2262] [Invalid:9253]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
racist the |
781 |
34.5% |
0.3452697 |
| 2 |
conservative the Islamic |
729 |
32.2% |
0.3222812 |
| 3 |
conservative the Christian |
752 |
33.2% |
0.3324492 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9253 |
|
NA |
r31_dmfspx
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Freedom of speech should apply for everyone no matter
how [r31_dmpfspx_ran] ideas they express are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
Freedom of speech should apply for everyone no matter how
[r31_dmpfspx_ran] ideas they express are.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
351 |
15.4% |
0.15394737 |
| 2 |
Agree |
584 |
25.6% |
0.25614035 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
324 |
14.2% |
0.14210526 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
144 |
6.3% |
0.06315789 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
386 |
16.9% |
0.16929825 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
290 |
12.7% |
0.12719298 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
173 |
7.6% |
0.07587719 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.01228070 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvedix_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvedix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2261] [Invalid:9254]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
allow |
1136 |
50.2% |
0.5024326 |
| 2 |
publicly fund |
1125 |
49.8% |
0.4975674 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9254 |
|
NA |
r31_dvedix_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvedix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2261] [Invalid:9254]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
established domestic institutions of higher education that currently train
Christian priests |
1158 |
51.2% |
0.5121628 |
| 2 |
domestic institutes run by Muslim organizations |
1103 |
48.8% |
0.4878372 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9254 |
|
NA |
r31_dvedix_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvedix].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2261] [Invalid:9254]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
BLANK |
1164 |
51.5% |
0.5148165 |
| 2 |
so that Muslims in Norway do not have to get this training from abroad (in a
country where Islam is the largest religion) |
1097 |
48.5% |
0.4851835 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9254 |
|
NA |
r31_dvedix
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Education for imams (Muslim clerics)
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements:
Norway should [r31_dvedix_ran1] training for imams at [r31_dvedix_ran2]
[r31_dvedix_ran3].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
90 |
3.9% |
0.03947368 |
| 2 |
Agree |
312 |
13.7% |
0.13684211 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
369 |
16.2% |
0.16184211 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
433 |
19.0% |
0.18991228 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
207 |
9.1% |
0.09078947 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
354 |
15.5% |
0.15526316 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
484 |
21.2% |
0.21228070 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.4% |
0.01359649 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_eqweh
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Women exaggerate claims of sexual harassment at work.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement?
Women exaggerate claims of sexual harassment at work.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
33 |
1.4% |
0.01447368 |
| 2 |
Agree |
82 |
3.6% |
0.03596491 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
234 |
10.3% |
0.10263158 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
562 |
24.6% |
0.24649123 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
312 |
13.7% |
0.13684211 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
639 |
28.0% |
0.28026316 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
391 |
17.1% |
0.17149123 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.2% |
0.01184211 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_eqweox_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_eqweox].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2259] [Invalid:9256]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
women |
720 |
31.9% |
0.3187251 |
| 2 |
men |
771 |
34.1% |
0.3413015 |
| 3 |
BLANK |
768 |
34.0% |
0.3399734 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9256 |
|
NA |
r31_eqweox
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Most [women/men/BLANK] in Norway believe that women
exaggerate claims of sexual harassment at work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you think most [r31_eqweox_ran] in Norway agree or disagree
that women exaggerate claims of sexual harassment at work?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
34 |
1.5% |
0.01491228 |
| 2 |
Agree |
174 |
7.6% |
0.07631579 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
506 |
22.2% |
0.22192982 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
580 |
25.4% |
0.25438596 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
384 |
16.8% |
0.16842105 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
424 |
18.6% |
0.18596491 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
141 |
6.2% |
0.06184211 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
1.6% |
0.01622807 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvnei
|
Variable label:
|
Easier/more difficult: for non-European immigrants to obtain residence
in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be easier or more difficult for non-European
immigrants to gain residence in Norway?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A lot easier |
25 |
1.1% |
0.01096491 |
| 2 |
Easier |
145 |
6.4% |
0.06359649 |
| 3 |
Somewhat easier |
557 |
24.4% |
0.24429825 |
| 4 |
Somewhat more difficult |
724 |
31.8% |
0.31754386 |
| 5 |
More difficult |
464 |
20.4% |
0.20350877 |
| 6 |
A lot more difficult |
319 |
14.0% |
0.13991228 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
2.0% |
0.02017544 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvneiox_pipe1
|
Variable label:
|
Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvneiox], [r31_dvneioxe] and
[r31_dvneioxf] based on [r31_dvnei].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_dvnei] = 1, 2, 3 the value is set to 1. If [r31_dvnei] = 4, 5,
6 the value is set to 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2234] [Invalid:9281]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
easier |
727 |
32.5% |
0.3254252 |
| 2 |
more difficult |
1507 |
67.5% |
0.6745748 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9281 |
|
NA |
r31_dvneiox_pipe2
|
Variable label:
|
Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvneiox], [r31_dvneioxe] and
[r31_dvneioxf] based on [r31_dvnei].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_dvnei] = 1, 2, 3 the value is set to 1. If [r31_dvnei] = 4, 5,
6 the value is set to 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2234] [Invalid:9281]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
more difficult |
727 |
32.5% |
0.3254252 |
| 2 |
easier |
1507 |
67.5% |
0.6745748 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9281 |
|
NA |
r31_dvneiox_pipe3
|
Variable label:
|
Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvneiox], [r31_dvneioxe] and
[r31_dvneioxf] based on [r31_dvnei].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_dvnei] = 1, 2, 3 the value is set to 1. If [r31_dvnei] = 4, 5,
6 the value is set to 2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2234] [Invalid:9281]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
sceptical of |
727 |
32.5% |
0.3254252 |
| 2 |
positive towards |
1507 |
67.5% |
0.6745748 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9281 |
|
NA |
r31_dvneiox_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvneiox].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2256] [Invalid:9259]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
We would like to know more about your thoughts on non-European immigration.
What do you think is the best argument for making it [r31_dvneiox_pipe1] for
non-European immigrants to gain residence in Norway? |
765 |
33.9% |
0.3390957 |
| 2 |
Some people think it should be [r31_dvneiox_pipe2] for immigrants to gain
residence in Norway. Think of reasons in favor of this position, even if you do
not support it yourself. If you had to mention one, what is the best argument
for making it [r31_dvneiox_pipe2] for immigrants to gain residence in Norway? |
742 |
32.9% |
0.3289007 |
| 3 |
Some people think it should be [r31_dvneiox_pipe2] for non-European immigrants
to gain residence in Norway. Try to take the perspective of someone who supports
this position, even if you do not support it yourself. Think of someone you know
who is [r31_dvneiox_pipe3] this type of immigration or imagine someone with this
view. What do you think this person believes is the best argument for making it
[r31_dvneiox_pipe2] for non-European immigrants to gain residence in Norway? |
749 |
33.2% |
0.3320035 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9259 |
|
NA |
r31_dvneiox
|
Variable label:
|
What is the best argument
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r31_dvneiox_ran]
|
|
Post-question:
|
Your answer can be either short or long. Preferably a couple of
sentences, or just a few words if you prefer.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_dvnei is answered) & (r31_group = 5)]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_dvneioxe_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you feel that those who are [r31_dvneioxe_pipe3]
non-European immigration respect this argument?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you feel that those who are [r31_dvneioxe_pipe3]
non-European immigration respect this argument?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_dvnei is answered & r31_dvneiox_ran = 1) &
(r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed on the same page as [r31_dvneiox]. Timetracker-variable
refers therefore to [r31_dvneiox].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
15 |
2.0% |
0.01960784 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
64 |
8.4% |
0.08366013 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
260 |
34.0% |
0.33986928 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
274 |
35.8% |
0.35816993 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
81 |
10.6% |
0.10588235 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
9.3% |
0.09281046 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10750 |
|
NA |
r31_dvneioxe_2
|
Variable label:
|
Do you think this is a good or bad argument for making it
[r31_dvneioxe_pipe2] for non-European immigrants to gain residence in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think this is a good or bad argument for making it
[r31_dvneioxe_pipe2] for non-European immigrants to gain residence in
Norway?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_dvnei is answered & r31_dvneiox_ran = 2, 3) &
(r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed on the same page as [r31_dvneiox]. Timetracker-variable
refers therefore to [r31_dvneiox].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
64 |
4.3% |
0.04292421 |
| 2 |
Good |
219 |
14.7% |
0.14688129 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
275 |
18.4% |
0.18443997 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
287 |
19.2% |
0.19248826 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
151 |
10.1% |
0.10127431 |
| 6 |
Bad |
204 |
13.7% |
0.13682093 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
117 |
7.8% |
0.07847082 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
174 |
11.7% |
0.11670020 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
10024 |
|
NA |
r31_ceagcx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_ceagcx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2240] [Invalid:9275]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
taxing CO2 |
1104 |
49.3% |
0.4928571 |
| 2 |
reforming agriculture |
1136 |
50.7% |
0.5071429 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9275 |
|
NA |
r31_ceagcx
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative towards measures that can reduce greenhouse gas
emissions
|
|
Literal question:
|
The negative effects of greenhouse gases on the environment and
climate have been widely discussed in the public debate. One measure
that can reduce such emissions is [r31_ceagcx_ran].
How positive or negative are you about this measure?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - Very negative |
174 |
7.6% |
0.07631579 |
| 2 |
1 |
77 |
3.4% |
0.03377193 |
| 3 |
2 |
100 |
4.4% |
0.04385965 |
| 4 |
3 |
138 |
6.1% |
0.06052632 |
| 5 |
4 |
107 |
4.7% |
0.04692982 |
| 6 |
5 - Neutral |
560 |
24.6% |
0.24561404 |
| 7 |
6 |
253 |
11.1% |
0.11096491 |
| 8 |
7 |
265 |
11.6% |
0.11622807 |
| 9 |
8 |
285 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
| 10 |
9 |
97 |
4.3% |
0.04254386 |
| 11 |
10 - Very positive |
171 |
7.5% |
0.07500000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
53 |
2.3% |
0.02324561 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_ce1orx_1_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_ce1orx_1] based on
[r31_ce2orx_1_ran].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_ce2orx_1_ran] = 1 the value is set to 1. If
[r31_ce2orx_1_ran] = 2 the value is set to 2.
Displayed in the same random order as [r31_ce2orx_1] - [r31_ce2orx_4].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2234] [Invalid:9281]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
it should be cheaper to travel by public transport |
1137 |
50.9% |
0.5089526 |
| 2 |
fossil fuels (gasoline/diesel) should become more expensive |
1097 |
49.1% |
0.4910474 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9281 |
|
NA |
r31_ce1orx_2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_ce1orx_2] based on
[r31_ce2orx_2_ran].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_ce2orx_2_ran] = 1 the value is set to 1. If
[r31_ce2orx_2_ran] = 2 the value is set to 2.
Displayed in the same random order as [r31_ce2orx_1] - [r31_ce2orx_4].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2234] [Invalid:9281]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
food with a high climate footprint should be more expensive, while food with a
low climate footprint should be cheaper |
1094 |
49.0% |
0.4897046 |
| 2 |
red meat should be more expensive, while plant-based food should be cheaper |
1140 |
51.0% |
0.5102954 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9281 |
|
NA |
r31_ce1orx_3_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_ce1orx_3] based on
[r31_ce2orx_3_ran].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_ce2orx_3_ran] = 1 the value is set to 1. If
[r31_ce2orx_3_ran] = 2 the value is set to 2.
Displayed in the same random order as [r31_ce2orx_1] - [r31_ce2orx_4].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2234] [Invalid:9281]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
offshore |
1042 |
46.6% |
0.4664279 |
| 2 |
onshore |
1192 |
53.4% |
0.5335721 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9281 |
|
NA |
r31_ce1orx_4_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_ce1orx_4] based on
[r31_ce2orx_4_ran].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_ce2orx_4_ran] = 1 the value is set to 1. If
[r31_ce2orx_4_ran] = 2 the value is set to 2.
Displayed in the same random order as [r31_ce2orx_1] - [r31_ce2orx_4].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2234] [Invalid:9281]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
solar panels should be installed on houses |
1127 |
50.4% |
0.5044763 |
| 2 |
solar power plants should be built |
1107 |
49.6% |
0.4955237 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9281 |
|
NA |
r31_dv1orx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dv1orx] based on
[r31_dv2orx_ran].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_dv2orx_ran] = 1 the value is set to 1. If [r31_dv2orx_ran] = 2
the value is set to 2. If [r31_dv2orx_ran] = 3 the value is set to 3. If
[r31_dv2orx_ran] = 4 the value is set to 4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2234] [Invalid:9281]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
no longer serve meals with meat to slow down climate change |
539 |
24.1% |
0.2412713 |
| 2 |
add meals without meat to slow down climate change |
564 |
25.2% |
0.2524620 |
| 3 |
no longer serve meals with pork to be considerate of Muslim religious rules |
550 |
24.6% |
0.2461952 |
| 4 |
add meals without pork to be considerate of Muslim religious rules |
581 |
26.0% |
0.2600716 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9281 |
|
NA |
r31_ce1orx_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: [r31_ce1orx_1_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that [r31_ce1orx_1_ran]?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
597 |
26.2% |
0.26184211 |
| 2 |
Agree |
512 |
22.5% |
0.22456140 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
320 |
14.0% |
0.14035088 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
190 |
8.3% |
0.08333333 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
204 |
8.9% |
0.08947368 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
202 |
8.9% |
0.08859649 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
196 |
8.6% |
0.08596491 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
2.6% |
0.02587719 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_ce1orx_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: [r31_ce1orx_2_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that [r31_ce1orx_2_ran]?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
185 |
8.1% |
0.08114035 |
| 2 |
Agree |
384 |
16.8% |
0.16842105 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
480 |
21.1% |
0.21052632 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
334 |
14.6% |
0.14649123 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
278 |
12.2% |
0.12192982 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
299 |
13.1% |
0.13114035 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
262 |
11.5% |
0.11491228 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
2.5% |
0.02543860 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_ce1orx_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: more wind power should be developed [r31_ce1orx_3_ran]
in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that more [r31_ce1orx_3_ran]
wind power should be developed in Norway?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
171 |
7.5% |
0.07500000 |
| 2 |
Agree |
380 |
16.7% |
0.16666667 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
481 |
21.1% |
0.21096491 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
240 |
10.5% |
0.10526316 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
262 |
11.5% |
0.11491228 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
322 |
14.1% |
0.14122807 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
364 |
16.0% |
0.15964912 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_ce1orx_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: it should [r31_ce1orx_4_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that more [r31_ce1orx_4_ran]?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
391 |
17.1% |
0.17149123 |
| 2 |
Agree |
699 |
30.7% |
0.30657895 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
538 |
23.6% |
0.23596491 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
288 |
12.6% |
0.12631579 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
124 |
5.4% |
0.05438596 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
108 |
4.7% |
0.04736842 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
62 |
2.7% |
0.02719298 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
70 |
3.1% |
0.03070175 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_ce1orx_order
|
Variable label:
|
Shows the order in which [r31_ce1orx_1], [r31_ce1orx_2], [r31_ce1orx_3]
and [r31_ce1orx_4] was displayed.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2232] [Invalid:9283]
[Range:-]
|
r31_dv1orx
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Some people suggest that canteens [r31_dv1orx_ran].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some people propose that canteens [r31_dv1orx_ran].
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agree strongly |
274 |
12.0% |
0.12017544 |
| 2 |
Agree somewhat |
450 |
19.7% |
0.19736842 |
| 3 |
Disagree somewhat |
533 |
23.4% |
0.23377193 |
| 4 |
Disagree strongly |
963 |
42.2% |
0.42236842 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvlcox_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvlcox].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2229] [Invalid:9286]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
imams (Muslims priests) |
553 |
24.8% |
0.2480933 |
| 2 |
Christian priests |
569 |
25.5% |
0.2552714 |
| 3 |
Muslim politicians |
547 |
24.5% |
0.2454015 |
| 4 |
politicians |
560 |
25.1% |
0.2512337 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9286 |
|
NA |
r31_dvlcox
|
Variable label:
|
Placement on scale: serving the residents of local communities
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please place yourself on the scale below where:
0 means that most [r31_dvlcox_ran] in Norway know enough to serve their
communities well. And 10 means that most [r31_dvlcox_ran] in Norway need
to learn more about what life is like for the members of their
communities.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Know enough |
94 |
4.1% |
0.04122807 |
| 1 |
1 |
78 |
3.4% |
0.03421053 |
| 2 |
2 |
165 |
7.2% |
0.07236842 |
| 3 |
3 |
170 |
7.5% |
0.07456140 |
| 4 |
4 |
96 |
4.2% |
0.04210526 |
| 5 |
5 |
481 |
21.1% |
0.21096491 |
| 6 |
6 |
200 |
8.8% |
0.08771930 |
| 7 |
7 |
255 |
11.2% |
0.11184211 |
| 8 |
8 |
262 |
11.5% |
0.11491228 |
| 9 |
9 |
97 |
4.3% |
0.04254386 |
| 10 |
10 - Learn more |
290 |
12.7% |
0.12719298 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
92 |
4.0% |
0.04035088 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dveidx_ran
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dveidx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2229] [Invalid:9286]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
all Muslims get the day off to celebrate Eid al-Fitr (the festival of breaking
the fast) as long as they compensate with overtime |
556 |
24.9% |
0.2494392 |
| 2 |
all people in the municipality get an extra day off when Muslims celebrate Eid
al-Fitr (the festival of breaking the fast) |
555 |
24.9% |
0.2489906 |
| 3 |
all people in the municipality get the day off when Muslims celebrate Eid
al-Fitr (the festival of breaking the fast). The holiday will replace one of the
Christian holidays |
580 |
26.0% |
0.2602064 |
| 4 |
all people in the municipality get the day off when Muslims celebrate Eid
al-Fitr (the festival of breaking the fast). The holiday will replace an
existing public holiday |
538 |
24.1% |
0.2413638 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9286 |
|
NA |
r31_dveidx
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative towards the proposal for local reform of public
holidays
|
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the following situation:
A city government in Norway discusses a possible reform to public
holidays locally. According to one proposal [r31_dveidx_ran].
How positive or negative are you to this proposal?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
113 |
5.0% |
0.04956140 |
| 2 |
Positive |
253 |
11.1% |
0.11096491 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
200 |
8.8% |
0.08771930 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
378 |
16.6% |
0.16578947 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
248 |
10.9% |
0.10877193 |
| 6 |
Negative |
473 |
20.7% |
0.20745614 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
556 |
24.4% |
0.24385965 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
2.6% |
0.02587719 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvaevx_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvaevx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2228] [Invalid:9287]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
group from The Progress Party |
729 |
32.7% |
0.3271993 |
| 2 |
group from The Conservative Party |
764 |
34.3% |
0.3429084 |
| 3 |
anti-Islamic group |
735 |
33.0% |
0.3298923 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9287 |
|
NA |
r31_dvaevx_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvaevx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2228] [Invalid:9287]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian culture |
1130 |
50.7% |
0.5071813 |
| 2 |
gay rights in Norway |
1098 |
49.3% |
0.4928187 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9287 |
|
NA |
r31_dvaevx_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvaevx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2228] [Invalid:9287]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
husband |
1089 |
48.9% |
0.4887792 |
| 2 |
wife |
1139 |
51.1% |
0.5112208 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9287 |
|
NA |
r31_dvaevx_ran4
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvaevx].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2228] [Invalid:9287]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
male |
1073 |
48.2% |
0.4815978 |
| 2 |
female |
1155 |
51.8% |
0.5184022 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9287 |
|
NA |
r31_dvaevx_pipe1
|
Variable label:
|
Selects an element for textpiping in [r31_dvaevx] based on
[r31_dvaevx_ran1].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If [r31_dvaevx_ran1] = 1 the value is set to 1. If [r31_dvaevx_ran1] =
2 the value is set to 2. If [r31_dvaevx_ran1] = 3 the value is set to
3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2228] [Invalid:9287]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
group from The Progress Party |
729 |
32.7% |
0.3271993 |
| 2 |
group from The Conservative Party |
764 |
34.3% |
0.3429084 |
| 3 |
anti-Islamic group |
735 |
33.0% |
0.3298923 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9287 |
|
NA |
r31_dvaevx_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: A local group should be allowed to hold an event
|
|
Literal question:
|
Consider that the [r31_dvaevx_ran4] leader of a local [r31_dvaevx_ran1]
has asked to hold a public event to criticize Islam as a threat to
[r31_dvaevx_ran2]. The [r31_dvaevx_ran4] leader, who lives in the local
area with their [r31_dvaevx_ran3] said: “Islam is one of the biggest
threats to [r31_dvaevx_ran2] today, and this is why we are talking about
this”. How much do you agree or disagree that the local
[r31_dvaevx_pipe1] should be allowed to hold the event?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
388 |
17.0% |
0.17017544 |
| 2 |
Agree |
546 |
23.9% |
0.23947368 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
331 |
14.5% |
0.14517544 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
345 |
15.1% |
0.15131579 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
235 |
10.3% |
0.10307018 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
235 |
10.3% |
0.10307018 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
133 |
5.8% |
0.05833333 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
67 |
2.9% |
0.02938596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvaevx_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree with the message to be promoted at the event?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the message that will be promoted
at the event?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
120 |
5.3% |
0.05263158 |
| 2 |
Agree |
223 |
9.8% |
0.09780702 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
389 |
17.1% |
0.17061404 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
398 |
17.5% |
0.17456140 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
276 |
12.1% |
0.12105263 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
453 |
19.9% |
0.19868421 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
348 |
15.3% |
0.15263158 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
73 |
3.2% |
0.03201754 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvaevx_3
|
Variable label:
|
Based on the information you have about the local group wanting to hold
the event, how much would you say you like or dislike it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on the information you have about the local group that wants to
hold the event, how much would you say you like or dislike it?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely like |
41 |
1.8% |
0.01798246 |
| 2 |
Really like |
70 |
3.1% |
0.03070175 |
| 3 |
Like somewhat |
185 |
8.1% |
0.08114035 |
| 4 |
Neither like nor dislike |
759 |
33.3% |
0.33289474 |
| 5 |
Dislike somewhat |
498 |
21.8% |
0.21842105 |
| 6 |
Really dislike |
441 |
19.3% |
0.19342105 |
| 7 |
Intensely dislike |
211 |
9.3% |
0.09254386 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
3.3% |
0.03289474 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvaevx_4
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable/unacceptable: someone says something negative about Muslims
in Norwegian society today?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How acceptable or unacceptable do you think it is that someone says
something negative about Muslims in Norwegian society today?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Highly acceptable |
135 |
5.9% |
0.05921053 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
405 |
17.8% |
0.17763158 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
456 |
20.0% |
0.20000000 |
| 4 |
Neither acceptable nor unacceptable |
364 |
16.0% |
0.15964912 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unacceptable |
418 |
18.3% |
0.18333333 |
| 6 |
Unacceptable |
353 |
15.5% |
0.15482456 |
| 7 |
Highly unacceptable |
83 |
3.6% |
0.03640351 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
66 |
2.9% |
0.02894737 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_plrel
|
Variable label:
|
How religious would you say you are?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Regardless of whether you belong to a particular religion, how religious
would you say you are?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Not at all religious |
744 |
32.6% |
0.32631579 |
| 1 |
1 |
254 |
11.1% |
0.11140351 |
| 2 |
2 |
215 |
9.4% |
0.09429825 |
| 3 |
3 |
192 |
8.4% |
0.08421053 |
| 4 |
4 |
112 |
4.9% |
0.04912281 |
| 5 |
5 |
231 |
10.1% |
0.10131579 |
| 6 |
6 |
149 |
6.5% |
0.06535088 |
| 7 |
7 |
131 |
5.7% |
0.05745614 |
| 8 |
8 |
106 |
4.6% |
0.04649123 |
| 9 |
9 |
51 |
2.2% |
0.02236842 |
| 10 |
10 - Very religious |
35 |
1.5% |
0.01535088 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_innor
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The world would be a better place if people from other
countries were more like Norwegians.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
The world would be a better place if people from other countries were
more like Norwegians.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_innob], [r31_innof].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
76 |
3.3% |
0.03333333 |
| 2 |
Agree |
215 |
9.4% |
0.09429825 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
435 |
19.1% |
0.19078947 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
691 |
30.3% |
0.30307018 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
289 |
12.7% |
0.12675439 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
370 |
16.2% |
0.16228070 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
130 |
5.7% |
0.05701754 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
74 |
3.2% |
0.03245614 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_innob
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Generally speaking, Norway is a better country than most
other countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
Generally speaking, Norway is a better country than most other
countries.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_innor], [r31_innof].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
289 |
12.7% |
0.12675439 |
| 2 |
Agree |
529 |
23.2% |
0.23201754 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
632 |
27.7% |
0.27719298 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
313 |
13.7% |
0.13728070 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
198 |
8.7% |
0.08684211 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
194 |
8.5% |
0.08508772 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
53 |
2.3% |
0.02324561 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
3.2% |
0.03157895 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_innof
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The world would be a better place if Norwegians
acknowledged Norway’s shortcomings.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
The world would be a better place if Norwegians acknowledged Norway’s
shortcomings.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_innor], [r31_innob].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
89 |
3.9% |
0.03903509 |
| 2 |
Agree |
266 |
11.7% |
0.11666667 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
462 |
20.3% |
0.20263158 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
859 |
37.7% |
0.37675439 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
185 |
8.1% |
0.08114035 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
259 |
11.4% |
0.11359649 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
78 |
3.4% |
0.03421053 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
82 |
3.6% |
0.03596491 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvupm
|
Variable label:
|
Describes yourself how well: It is important to me personally to be
unprejudiced towards Muslims.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following description fits
you:
It is important to me personally to be unprejudiced towards Muslims.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dvapr].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
282 |
12.4% |
0.12368421 |
| 2 |
Well |
764 |
33.5% |
0.33508772 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
484 |
21.2% |
0.21228070 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
438 |
19.2% |
0.19210526 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
144 |
6.3% |
0.06315789 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
56 |
2.5% |
0.02456140 |
| 7 |
Very Poorly |
39 |
1.7% |
0.01710526 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
73 |
3.2% |
0.03201754 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_dvapr
|
Variable label:
|
Describes yourself how well: I would not like to appear to be racist,
not even to myself.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following description fits
you:
I would not like to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5)]
[Displayed in random order with [r31_dvupm].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
521 |
22.9% |
0.228508772 |
| 2 |
Well |
844 |
37.0% |
0.370175439 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
318 |
13.9% |
0.139473684 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
359 |
15.7% |
0.157456140 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poorly |
104 |
4.6% |
0.045614035 |
| 6 |
Poorly |
42 |
1.8% |
0.018421053 |
| 7 |
Very Poorly |
22 |
1.0% |
0.009649123 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
70 |
3.1% |
0.030701754 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9235 |
|
NA |
r31_poelex_religion1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects religion for candidate A in [r31_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_religion2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects religion for candidate B in [r31_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_innvandring1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects immigration status for candidate A in
[r31_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_innvandring2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects immigration status for candidate B in
[r31_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_alder1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects age for candidate A in [r31_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_alder2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects age for candidate B in [r31_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_utd1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects education level for candidate A in
[r31_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_utd2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects education level for candidate B in
[r31_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_gender1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects gender for candidate A in [r31_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_gender2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects gender for candidate B in [r31_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_polerfaring1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects political experience for candidate A in
[r31_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_polerfaring2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects political experience for candidate B in
[r31_poelex].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_rerandomize
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Technical details on re-randomisation of
[r31_poelex]-variables if it was necessary.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If there was a necessity to re-randomise information for one of the
candidates in [r30_poelex], the information is stored here.]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_roworder
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. The random order of attributes shown in the table in
[r31_poelex]. Sets the subject’s rowwise placement, sorted by subject.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If the first number is 2, it means that subject 1 (“religion”) was
displayed in row number 2. If the second number is 4, it means that
subject 1 (“immigration status”) was displayed in row number 4, etc..
For the sequential order, sorted by rownumber, see
[r30_poelex_roworder_seq]. 1 = Religion. 2 = immigration status. 3 =
Age. 4 = Education level. 5 = Gender. 6 = Political experience.]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex_roworder_seq
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. The random order of attributes shown in the table in
[r31_poelex]. Set sequentially, sorted by rownumber.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The first number in the array shows what category was displayed in
the first row, while the next number shows what category was shown in
the second row etc.. 1 = Religion. 2 = immigration status. 3 = Age. 4 =
Education level. 5 = Gender. 6 = Political experience.]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_poelex
|
Variable label:
|
Preferred mayoral candidate
|
|
Literal question:
|
We are interested in knowing which leaders voters would like to
represent them in the municipal elections. Please read carefully the
descriptions about two possible mayoral candidates and consider which of
the two you prefer. Both represent the party that you would like to vote
for:
Candidate A [r31_poelex_religion1] [r31_poelex_immigration1]
[r31_poelex_age1] [r31_poelex_utd1] [r31_poelex_gender1] [r31_pole
experience1]
Candidate B [r31_poelex_religion2] [r31_poelex_immigration2]
[r31_poelex_age2] [r31_poelex_utd2] [r31_poelex_gender2] [r31_pole
experience2]
Based on this information, which mayoral candidate do you prefer?
|
|
Equivalent in others panels:
|
p11_poelex
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 1) | (r31_group = 2) | (r31_group = 3) |
(r31_group = 4)]
[Respondents was shown information about the candidates in a table.
Variables listed in question text was shown in random order which is
stored in [r31_poelex_roworder] and [r31_poelex_roworder_seq].
If [r31_group] = 1, 3 the respondents were exposed to the question
after [r31_pceum]. If [r31_group] = 2 the respondents were exposed to
the question after [r31_pohpqxc]. If [r31_group] = 4 the respondents
were exposed to the question after [r31_dmaicx].]
[80% of data withheld.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31_cpredx2_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_cpredx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 3) | (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4534] [Invalid:6981]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
People from the big cities |
2241 |
49.4% |
0.4942655 |
| 2 |
National politicians and the authorities in Oslo |
2293 |
50.6% |
0.5057345 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6981 |
|
NA |
r31_cpredx2_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects an element for textpiping in [r31_cpredx2].
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r31_group = 3) | (r31_group = 4)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4534] [Invalid:6981]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
culture and way of life in |
1099 |
24.2% |
0.2423908 |
| 2 |
value creation and trade and industry in |
1153 |
25.4% |
0.2543008 |
| 3 |
the need for good public services, such as schools, hospitals and police, in |
1136 |
25.1% |
0.2505514 |
| 4 |
the cost of climate policy for |
1146 |
25.3% |
0.2527569 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6981 |
|
NA |
r31_cpredx2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: [r31_cpredx2_ran1] acknowledges [r31_cpredx2_ran2] rural
areas to an insufficient extent.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
[r31_cpredx2_ran1] acknowledges [r31_cpredx2_ran2] rural areas to an
insufficient extent.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 3) | (r31_group = 4)]
[If [r31_group] = 3 the respondents were exposed to the question after
[r31_mlinlx]. If [r31_group] = 4 the respondents were exposed to the
question after [r31_poelex].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
810 |
17.8% |
0.17802198 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1131 |
24.9% |
0.24857143 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1005 |
22.1% |
0.22087912 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
815 |
17.9% |
0.17912088 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
295 |
6.5% |
0.06483516 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
339 |
7.5% |
0.07450549 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
110 |
2.4% |
0.02417582 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
45 |
1.0% |
0.00989011 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6965 |
|
NA |
r31_dvneioxf
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling thermometer for those who believe that it should be
[r31_dvneiox_pipe2] for non-European immigrants to obtain residence in
Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like to know how you feel about those who think it should be
[r31_dvneiox_pipe2] for non-European immigrants to gain residence in
Norway. We ask you to rate those who support this position on a
so-called “feeling thermometer”.
Ratings between 50 and 100 degrees mean that you have warm and positive
feelings towards them. Ratings between 0 and 50 degrees mean that you
have cold and negative feelings towards them. Ratings of 50 degrees mean
that you do not feel particularly warm or cold towards them.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Pull the slider down to give your rating.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r31_group = 5) & (r31_dvnei) is answered]
[If [r31_dvneiox_ran] = 1 the question was displayed before
[r31_dvneiox]. If [r31_dvneiox_ran] = 2, 3 the question was displayed
after [r31_dvneioxe_1] and [r31_dvneioxe_2].
The respondents answered by using a slider.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2146] [Invalid:9369]
[Range:0-100]
|
r31_cesfhx
|
Variable label:
|
What is your impression of the feed that salmon receive?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your impression of the feed that salmon receive?
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom (r31_group = 2)]
[Hvis [r31_cesfhx_ran] = 1 ble spørsmålet stilt etter [r31_cesfi].
Hvis [r31_cesfhx_ran] = 2 ble spørsmålet stilt etter [r31_ceswfx].
Hvis [r31_cesfhx_ran] = 1 ble respondenten vist teksten “I dag er soya,
fiskemel og fiskeolje viktige ingredienser i fôret. 92% av ingrediensene
er importerte.” over spørsmålsteksten.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It helps to make fish very healthy for humans |
42 |
1.8% |
0.01797176 |
| 2 |
It helps to make fish healthy for humans |
565 |
24.2% |
0.24176294 |
| 3 |
It has no effect on how healthy the fish are for humans |
686 |
29.4% |
0.29353872 |
| 4 |
It helps to make fish unhealthy for humans |
805 |
34.4% |
0.34445871 |
| 5 |
It helps to make fish very unhealthy for humans |
113 |
4.8% |
0.04835259 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
126 |
5.4% |
0.05391528 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
9178 |
|
NA |
r31_avslutt
|
Variable label:
|
Closing comments.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be
made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of
Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
r31P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
5853 |
50.8% |
0.5082935 |
| 2 |
Female |
5662 |
49.2% |
0.4917065 |
r31P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
1793 |
15.6% |
0.15570994 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
4164 |
36.2% |
0.36161528 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
569 |
4.9% |
0.04941381 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
3145 |
27.3% |
0.27312201 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
970 |
8.4% |
0.08423795 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
874 |
7.6% |
0.07590100 |
r31P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:3-56]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
1793 |
15.6% |
0.155709944 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
1113 |
9.7% |
0.096656535 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
461 |
4.0% |
0.040034737 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
436 |
3.8% |
0.037863656 |
| 31 |
Østfold |
522 |
4.5% |
0.045332175 |
| 32 |
Akershus |
1652 |
14.3% |
0.143465046 |
| 33 |
Buskerud |
485 |
4.2% |
0.042118975 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
628 |
5.5% |
0.054537560 |
| 39 |
Vestfold |
584 |
5.1% |
0.050716457 |
| 40 |
Telemark |
293 |
2.5% |
0.025445072 |
| 42 |
Agder |
569 |
4.9% |
0.049413808 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
1571 |
13.6% |
0.136430743 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
970 |
8.4% |
0.084237950 |
| 55 |
Troms |
323 |
2.8% |
0.028050369 |
| 56 |
Finnmark |
115 |
1.0% |
0.009986974 |
r31P3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Constituencies parliament election 2021
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Østfold |
522 |
4.5% |
0.045332175 |
| 1 |
Akershus |
1640 |
14.2% |
0.142422927 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
1793 |
15.6% |
0.155709944 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
331 |
2.9% |
0.028745115 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
297 |
2.6% |
0.025792445 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
497 |
4.3% |
0.043161094 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
584 |
5.1% |
0.050716457 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
293 |
2.5% |
0.025445072 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
201 |
1.7% |
0.017455493 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
368 |
3.2% |
0.031958315 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
1113 |
9.7% |
0.096656535 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
1391 |
12.1% |
0.120798958 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
180 |
1.6% |
0.015631785 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
461 |
4.0% |
0.040034737 |
| 16 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
775 |
6.7% |
0.067303517 |
| 15 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
195 |
1.7% |
0.016934433 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
436 |
3.8% |
0.037863656 |
| 18 |
Troms |
323 |
2.8% |
0.028050369 |
| 19 |
Finnmark |
115 |
1.0% |
0.009986974 |
r31P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (condensed)
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
4547 |
39.5% |
0.3948762 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
5481 |
47.6% |
0.4759878 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
1487 |
12.9% |
0.1291359 |
r31P5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (expanded, from 1949)
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1949 or earlier |
1765 |
15.3% |
0.15327833 |
| 2 |
1950-1959 |
2782 |
24.2% |
0.24159792 |
| 3 |
1960-1969 |
2562 |
22.2% |
0.22249240 |
| 4 |
1970-1979 |
1773 |
15.4% |
0.15397308 |
| 5 |
1980-1989 |
1146 |
10.0% |
0.09952236 |
| 6 |
1990-1999 |
856 |
7.4% |
0.07433782 |
| 7 |
2000 or later |
631 |
5.5% |
0.05479809 |
r31_Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-4]
|
r31_Weight4_stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1) upper
secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and age.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11416] [Invalid:99]
[Range:0-0]
|
r31_generic_stratapop
|
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata
constructed with P1, P2, and age.
|
|
Field period:
|
04.11.2024 - 25.11.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-0]
|
c16_bgbfi_1
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Reserved
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…is reserved
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 15 and 16.
[Source variables: r15bfi10_1, r16bfi10_1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6412] [Invalid:5103]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
1125 |
18.7% |
0.186939182 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1469 |
24.4% |
0.244101030 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
962 |
16.0% |
0.159853772 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
2029 |
33.7% |
0.337155201 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
391 |
6.5% |
0.064971751 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006979063 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
394 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
5103 |
|
NA |
c16_bgbfi_2
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Generally trusting
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…is generally trusting
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 15 and 16.
[Source variables: r15bfi10_2, r16bfi10_2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6449] [Invalid:5066]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
129 |
2.1% |
0.021304707 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
501 |
8.3% |
0.082741536 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
698 |
11.5% |
0.115276631 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
2913 |
48.1% |
0.481090008 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
1772 |
29.3% |
0.292650702 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006936416 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
394 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
5066 |
|
NA |
c16_bgbfi_3
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Tends to be lazy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
…tends to be lazy
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 15 and 16.
[Source variables: r15bfi10_3, r16bfi10_3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6449] [Invalid:5066]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
2083 |
34.4% |
0.344013212 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1680 |
27.7% |
0.277456647 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
979 |
16.2% |
0.161684558 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1071 |
17.7% |
0.176878613 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
200 |
3.3% |
0.033030553 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006936416 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
394 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
5066 |
|
NA |
c16_bgbfi_4
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Relaxed, handles stress well
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is relaxed, handles stress well
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 15 and 16.
[Source variables: r15bfi10_4, r16bfi10_4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6446] [Invalid:5069]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
250 |
4.1% |
0.041308658 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1112 |
18.4% |
0.183740912 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
970 |
16.0% |
0.160277594 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
2465 |
40.7% |
0.407303371 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
1213 |
20.0% |
0.200429610 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006939855 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
394 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
5069 |
|
NA |
c16_bgbfi_5
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Has few artistic interests
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… has few artistic interests
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 15 and 16.
[Source variables: r15bfi10_5, r16bfi10_5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6446] [Invalid:5069]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
1802 |
29.8% |
0.297752809 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1915 |
31.6% |
0.316424323 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
941 |
15.5% |
0.155485790 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1029 |
17.0% |
0.170026438 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
323 |
5.3% |
0.053370787 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006939855 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
394 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
5069 |
|
NA |
c16_bgbfi_6
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Outgoing, sociable
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… is outgoing, sociable
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 15 and 16.
[Source variables: r15bfi10_6, r16bfi10_6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6457] [Invalid:5058]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
257 |
4.2% |
0.042388257 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
955 |
15.8% |
0.157512782 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
982 |
16.2% |
0.161966023 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
2259 |
37.3% |
0.372587828 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
1568 |
25.9% |
0.258617846 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006927264 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
394 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
5058 |
|
NA |
c16_bgbfi_7
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Tends to find fault with others
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… tends to find fault with others
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 15 and 16.
[Source variables: r15bfi10_7, r16bfi10_7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6455] [Invalid:5060]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
1024 |
16.9% |
0.16894902 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1833 |
30.2% |
0.30242534 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1737 |
28.7% |
0.28658637 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1284 |
21.2% |
0.21184623 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
141 |
2.3% |
0.02326349 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.00692955 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
394 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
5060 |
|
NA |
c16_bgbfi_8
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Does a thorough job
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… does a thorough job
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 15 and 16.
[Source variables: r15bfi10_8, r16bfi10_8]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6457] [Invalid:5058]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
81 |
1.3% |
0.013359723 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
118 |
1.9% |
0.019462312 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
505 |
8.3% |
0.083292100 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
2516 |
41.5% |
0.414976084 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
2801 |
46.2% |
0.461982517 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006927264 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
394 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
5058 |
|
NA |
c16_bgbfi_9
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Get nervous easily
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… get nervous easily
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 15 and 16.
[Source variables: r15bfi10_9, r16bfi10_9]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6452] [Invalid:5063]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
1875 |
31.0% |
0.309508088 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
1807 |
29.8% |
0.298283262 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1053 |
17.4% |
0.173819742 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
1050 |
17.3% |
0.173324530 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
231 |
3.8% |
0.038131397 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006932981 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
394 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
5063 |
|
NA |
c16_bgbfi_10
|
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Has an active imagination
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see
myself as someone who…
|
|
Literal question:
|
… has an active imagination
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 15 and 16.
[Source variables: r15bfi10_10, r16bfi10_10]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6451] [Invalid:5064]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Disagree strongly |
399 |
6.6% |
0.065874195 |
| 2 |
Disagree a little |
803 |
13.3% |
0.132573881 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1519 |
25.1% |
0.250784217 |
| 4 |
Agree a little |
2102 |
34.7% |
0.347036487 |
| 5 |
Agree strongly |
1192 |
19.7% |
0.196797094 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006934126 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
394 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
5064 |
|
NA |
c16_bgbfi_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c16_bgbfi
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6487] [Invalid:5028]
[Range:-]
|
c23_bgsdo_1
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: An ideal society requires some groups to
be on top and others to be on the bottom
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
An ideal society requires some groups to be on top and others to be on
the bottom
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 17 and 23.
[Source variables: r17sdo7_1, r23sdo7_1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8328] [Invalid:3187]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
2708 |
35.2% |
0.351916829 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
1405 |
18.3% |
0.182586095 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
925 |
12.0% |
0.120207927 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
960 |
12.5% |
0.124756335 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
929 |
12.1% |
0.120727745 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
596 |
7.7% |
0.077452891 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
135 |
1.8% |
0.017543860 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.5% |
0.004808317 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
633 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
3187 |
|
NA |
c23_bgsdo_2
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: Some groups of people are simply inferior
to other groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 17 and 23.
[Source variables: r17sdo7_2, r23sdo7_2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8323] [Invalid:3192]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
4731 |
61.5% |
0.615214564 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
863 |
11.2% |
0.112223667 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
422 |
5.5% |
0.054876463 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
806 |
10.5% |
0.104811443 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
508 |
6.6% |
0.066059818 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
254 |
3.3% |
0.033029909 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
69 |
0.9% |
0.008972692 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.5% |
0.004811443 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
633 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
3192 |
|
NA |
c23_bgsdo_3
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: No one group should dominate in society.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
No one group should dominate in society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 17 and 23.
[Source variables: r17sdo7_3, r23sdo7_3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8325] [Invalid:3190]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
433 |
5.6% |
0.056292252 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
355 |
4.6% |
0.046151846 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
411 |
5.3% |
0.053432137 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
737 |
9.6% |
0.095813833 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
757 |
9.8% |
0.098413937 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
1544 |
20.1% |
0.200728029 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
3418 |
44.4% |
0.444357774 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.5% |
0.004810192 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
633 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
3190 |
|
NA |
c23_bgsdo_4
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: Groups at the bottom are just as deserving
as groups at the top.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 17 and 23.
[Source variables: r17sdo7_4, r23sdo7_4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8306] [Invalid:3209]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
334 |
4.4% |
0.043529258 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
567 |
7.4% |
0.073895478 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
749 |
9.8% |
0.097615014 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
1040 |
13.6% |
0.135540206 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
856 |
11.2% |
0.111560016 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
1666 |
21.7% |
0.217124984 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
2424 |
31.6% |
0.315912941 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.5% |
0.004822103 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
633 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
3209 |
|
NA |
c23_bgsdo_5
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: Equality between groups should not be our
main goal.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Equality between groups should not be our main goal.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 17 and 23.
[Source variables: r17sdo7_5, r23sdo7_5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8313] [Invalid:3202]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
1623 |
21.1% |
0.211328125 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
1619 |
21.1% |
0.210807292 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
882 |
11.5% |
0.114843750 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
1272 |
16.6% |
0.165625000 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
1051 |
13.7% |
0.136848958 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
777 |
10.1% |
0.101171875 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
419 |
5.5% |
0.054557292 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.5% |
0.004817708 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
633 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
3202 |
|
NA |
c23_bgsdo_6
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 17 and 23.
[Source variables: r17sdo7_6, r23sdo7_6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8292] [Invalid:3223]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
1827 |
23.9% |
0.238542891 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
1387 |
18.1% |
0.181094138 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
861 |
11.2% |
0.112416765 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
1603 |
20.9% |
0.209296253 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
958 |
12.5% |
0.125081603 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
682 |
8.9% |
0.089045567 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
304 |
4.0% |
0.039691866 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.5% |
0.004830918 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
633 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
3223 |
|
NA |
c23_bgsdo_7
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: We should do what we can to equalize
conditions for different groups.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 17 and 23.
[Source variables: r17sdo7_7, r23sdo7_7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8319] [Invalid:3196]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
71 |
0.9% |
0.009237575 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
219 |
2.8% |
0.028493365 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
390 |
5.1% |
0.050741608 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
754 |
9.8% |
0.098100442 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
1323 |
17.2% |
0.172131148 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
1881 |
24.5% |
0.244730679 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
3011 |
39.2% |
0.391751236 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.5% |
0.004813947 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
633 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
3196 |
|
NA |
c23_bgsdo_8
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of support/opposition: We should work to give all groups an equal
chance to succeed.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by
selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale. You can look through the
assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should work to give all groups an equal chance to succeed.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 17 and 23.
[Source variables: r17sdo7_8, r23sdo7_8]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8331] [Invalid:3184]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 – Strongly oppose |
39 |
0.5% |
0.005066251 |
| 2 |
2 – Somewhat oppose |
37 |
0.5% |
0.004806443 |
| 3 |
3 – Slightly oppose |
70 |
0.9% |
0.009093271 |
| 4 |
4 - Neutral |
297 |
3.9% |
0.038581450 |
| 5 |
5 – Slightly favor |
677 |
8.8% |
0.087944921 |
| 6 |
6 – Somewhat favor |
1550 |
20.1% |
0.201351000 |
| 7 |
7 – Strongly favor |
4991 |
64.8% |
0.648350221 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.5% |
0.004806443 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
633 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
3184 |
|
NA |
c23_bgsdo_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c23_bgsdo
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8352] [Invalid:3163]
[Range:-]
|
c25_bgtiv_1
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Respect for parents and for older people is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that [he/she] should always show respect for [him/her]
parents and for older people. It’s important to [his/hers] to be
obedient.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 11, 17, 21, 22 and 25.
[Source variables: r11bktivi_1, r17bktivi_1, r21bktivi_1, r22bktivi_1,
r25_bgtiv_1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9804] [Invalid:1711]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
645 |
7.1% |
0.071160635 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
1976 |
21.8% |
0.218005296 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
3423 |
37.8% |
0.377647838 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
1790 |
19.7% |
0.197484554 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
835 |
9.2% |
0.092122683 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
335 |
3.7% |
0.036959400 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
0.7% |
0.006619594 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
740 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1711 |
|
NA |
c25_bgtiv_2
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Religious faith is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do
what [him/her] religion requires.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 11, 17, 21, 22 and 25.
[Source variables: r11bktivi_2, r17bktivi_2, r21bktivi_2, r22bktivi_2,
r25_bgtiv_2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9815] [Invalid:1700]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
154 |
1.7% |
0.01696970 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
340 |
3.7% |
0.03746556 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
774 |
8.5% |
0.08528926 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
1143 |
12.6% |
0.12595041 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
1791 |
19.7% |
0.19735537 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
4813 |
53.0% |
0.53035813 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
0.7% |
0.00661157 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
740 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1700 |
|
NA |
c25_bgtiv_3
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To help people around you is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She]
wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 11, 17, 21, 22 and 25.
[Source variables: r11bktivi_3, r17bktivi_3, r21bktivi_3, r22bktivi_3,
r25_bgtiv_3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9805] [Invalid:1710]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
1540 |
17.0% |
0.169884170 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
3429 |
37.8% |
0.378268064 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
3398 |
37.5% |
0.374848318 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
528 |
5.8% |
0.058246001 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
92 |
1.0% |
0.010148924 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
18 |
0.2% |
0.001985659 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
0.7% |
0.006618864 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
740 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1710 |
|
NA |
c25_bgtiv_4
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have all people in the world be treated equally is
important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated
equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in
life.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 11, 17, 21, 22 and 25.
[Source variables: r11bktivi_4, r17bktivi_4, r21bktivi_4, r22bktivi_4,
r25_bgtiv_4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9813] [Invalid:1702]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
2330 |
25.7% |
0.256805908 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
3398 |
37.5% |
0.374517800 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
2456 |
27.1% |
0.270693266 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
549 |
6.1% |
0.060509203 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
213 |
2.3% |
0.023476248 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
67 |
0.7% |
0.007384548 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
0.7% |
0.006613028 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
740 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1702 |
|
NA |
c25_bgtiv_5
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be interested in things and to be curious is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She]
likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 11, 17, 21, 22 and 25.
[Source variables: r11bktivi_5, r17bktivi_5, r21bktivi_5, r22bktivi_5,
r25_bgtiv_5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9810] [Invalid:1705]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
1880 |
20.7% |
0.207276736 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
3197 |
35.2% |
0.352480706 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
3027 |
33.4% |
0.333737596 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
709 |
7.8% |
0.078169791 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
161 |
1.8% |
0.017750827 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
36 |
0.4% |
0.003969129 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
0.7% |
0.006615215 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
740 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1705 |
|
NA |
c25_bgtiv_6
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take risks and look for new experiences is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new
experiences.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 11, 17, 21, 22 and 25.
[Source variables: r11bktivi_6, r17bktivi_6, r21bktivi_6, r22bktivi_6,
r25_bgtiv_6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9812] [Invalid:1703]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
155 |
1.7% |
0.017085538 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
671 |
7.4% |
0.073963845 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
2275 |
25.1% |
0.250771605 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
3051 |
33.6% |
0.336309524 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
1964 |
21.6% |
0.216490300 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
896 |
9.9% |
0.098765432 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
0.7% |
0.006613757 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
740 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1703 |
|
NA |
c25_bgtiv_7
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To seek out opportunites to have fun is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for
[his/hers] to do things that give [his/hers] pleasure.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 11, 17, 21, 22 and 25.
[Source variables: r11bktivi_7, r17bktivi_7, r21bktivi_7, r22bktivi_7,
r25_bgtiv_7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9810] [Invalid:1705]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
281 |
3.1% |
0.030981257 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
1108 |
12.2% |
0.122160970 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
3345 |
36.9% |
0.368798236 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
2758 |
30.4% |
0.304079383 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
1159 |
12.8% |
0.127783903 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
359 |
4.0% |
0.039581036 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
0.7% |
0.006615215 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
740 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1705 |
|
NA |
c25_bgtiv_8
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be successful and to impress other people is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress
other people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 11, 17, 21, 22 and 25.
[Source variables: r11bktivi_8, r17bktivi_8, r21bktivi_8, r22bktivi_8,
r25_bgtiv_8]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9812] [Invalid:1703]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
164 |
1.8% |
0.018077601 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
655 |
7.2% |
0.072200176 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
2212 |
24.4% |
0.243827160 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
3056 |
33.7% |
0.336860670 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
1944 |
21.4% |
0.214285714 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
981 |
10.8% |
0.108134921 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
0.7% |
0.006613757 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
740 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1703 |
|
NA |
c25_bgtiv_9
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take the lead and tell others what to do is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to
do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 11, 17, 21, 22 and 25.
[Source variables: r11bktivi_9, r17bktivi_9, r21bktivi_9, r22bktivi_9,
r25_bgtiv_9]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9815] [Invalid:1700]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
80 |
0.9% |
0.008815427 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
581 |
6.4% |
0.064022039 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
2430 |
26.8% |
0.267768595 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
2948 |
32.5% |
0.324848485 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
1971 |
21.7% |
0.217190083 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
1005 |
11.1% |
0.110743802 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
0.7% |
0.006611570 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
740 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1700 |
|
NA |
c25_bgtiv_10
|
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have things tidy and clean is important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think
about how much this person resembles you. For each person described,
check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble
you.
|
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She]
really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 11, 17, 21, 22 and 25.
[Source variables: r11bktivi_10, r17bktivi_10, r21bktivi_10,
r22bktivi_10, r25_bgtiv_10]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9817] [Invalid:1698]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
1245 |
13.7% |
0.137159855 |
| 5 |
5 Resembles me |
2500 |
27.5% |
0.275421395 |
| 4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
3263 |
35.9% |
0.359480004 |
| 3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
1330 |
14.7% |
0.146524182 |
| 2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
533 |
5.9% |
0.058719841 |
| 1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
146 |
1.6% |
0.016084609 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
60 |
0.7% |
0.006610113 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
740 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1698 |
|
NA |
c25_bgtiv_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c25_bgtiv
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9837] [Invalid:1678]
[Range:-]
|
c25_pcvot21
|
Variable label:
|
Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in
2021
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for in the previous parliamentary elections in
2021
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in r22 and r25, for the 2021 parliamentary
election.
Text from the “other”-field has been coded into the response
categories where possible.
[Source variables: r22k3_kodet, r25_pcvot21]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9450] [Invalid:2065]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
315 |
3.5% |
0.035187668 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1753 |
19.6% |
0.195822163 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
612 |
6.8% |
0.068364611 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
440 |
4.9% |
0.049151028 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
930 |
10.4% |
0.103887399 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
927 |
10.4% |
0.103552279 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
514 |
5.7% |
0.057417337 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2027 |
22.6% |
0.226429848 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
613 |
6.8% |
0.068476318 |
| 10 |
Other: |
246 |
2.7% |
0.027479893 |
| 11 |
Did not vote |
177 |
2.0% |
0.019772118 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
322 |
3.6% |
0.035969616 |
| 13 |
Voted blank |
41 |
0.5% |
0.004579982 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.4% |
0.003909741 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
498 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2065 |
|
NA |
c25_pcvot21_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c25_pcvot21
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9450] [Invalid:2065]
[Range:-]
|
c26_bginc
|
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked this way in r8, most recently in r26. Most
respondents have values from the last year, but it is possible to have
values back to r8. You can filter using the source-variable if you only
want respondents with the newer values. If you only want to use newest
data, use r29_bginc_v2. If you want data on as many as possible, recode
and combine c26_bginc with r29_bginc_v2
[Source variables: r8k25, r9k25, r11bk25, r14bk25, r16bk25, r18bk25,
r20bk25, r22bk25, r23bk25, r25_bginc, r26k2_bginc]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10013] [Invalid:1502]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than 150 000 |
308 |
3.1% |
0.030867909 |
| 2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
966 |
9.7% |
0.096812989 |
| 3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
1405 |
14.1% |
0.140809782 |
| 4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1530 |
15.3% |
0.153337342 |
| 5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
1470 |
14.7% |
0.147324113 |
| 6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
1447 |
14.5% |
0.145019042 |
| 7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
1821 |
18.3% |
0.182501503 |
| 8 |
More than 1 000000 |
960 |
9.6% |
0.096211666 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
71 |
0.7% |
0.007115654 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
35 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1502 |
|
NA |
c26_bginc_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c26_bginc
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10013] [Invalid:1502]
[Range:-]
|
c26_pcepe
|
Variable label:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like
you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like
you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question at
least once, some have been asked several times, first in r8, most
recently in r26. Here you will find the respondent’s most recent value.
You can filter using the source-variable if you only want respondents
with the newer values.
[Source variables: r8k13, r10kmini13, r14pk13, r17pk13, r20pk13,
r23pk13, r26_pcepe]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9753] [Invalid:1762]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
94 |
1.0% |
0.01013259 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
1104 |
11.9% |
0.11900399 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
4113 |
44.3% |
0.44335453 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
3139 |
33.8% |
0.33836370 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
781 |
8.4% |
0.08418670 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
0.5% |
0.00495850 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
476 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1762 |
|
NA |
c26_pcepe_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c26_pcepe
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9753] [Invalid:1762]
[Range:-]
|
c26_pcipe
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me
do not understand what it’s about.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statement:
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not
understand what it’s about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question at
least once, some have been asked several times. The question was first
asked in r1, most recently in r26. Here you will find the respondent’s
most recent value. You can filter using the source-variable if you only
want respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: w01_k14_1, w03_r3k14_1, r8k14, r14pk14, r17pk14,
r20pk14, r23pk14, r26_pcipe]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9809] [Invalid:1706]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
348 |
3.7% |
0.036604607 |
| 2 |
Agree |
962 |
10.1% |
0.101188598 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2630 |
27.7% |
0.276638267 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
886 |
9.3% |
0.093194488 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1266 |
13.3% |
0.133165036 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
2447 |
25.7% |
0.257389292 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
942 |
9.9% |
0.099084885 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.3% |
0.002734827 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
302 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1706 |
|
NA |
c26_pcipe_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c26_pcipe
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9809] [Invalid:1706]
[Range:-]
|
c26_pcsal
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with life
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r11, most recently in r26. Most respondents
have values from the last two years, but it is possible to have values
back to r11. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r11pktilfreds1, r14pktilfreds1, r17pktilfreds1,
r18pktilfreds1, ft1covid14, r20pktilfreds1, r22pktilfreds1,
r23pktilfreds1, r26_pcsal]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9874] [Invalid:1641]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
2652 |
26.9% |
0.2694300518 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
5703 |
57.9% |
0.5793965254 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1173 |
11.9% |
0.1191709845 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
264 |
2.7% |
0.0268210911 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
49 |
0.5% |
0.0049781571 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002031901 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
31 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1641 |
|
NA |
c26_pcsal_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c26_pcsal
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9874] [Invalid:1641]
[Range:-]
|
c27_bgoil
|
Variable label:
|
[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely
associated with it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely
associated with it?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked this way in r9, most recently in r27. Most
respondents have values from the last year, but it is possible to have
values back to r9. You can filter using the source-variable if you only
want respondents with the newer values. It can also be relevant to
combine with c29_bgind_20.
[Source variables: r9k24a, r12arbeidolje_1, r15arbeidolje1,
r16arbeidolje1, r26_bgoil, r27_bgoil]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9647] [Invalid:1868]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, I [work/worked] in the oil or gas industry |
341 |
4.1% |
0.041034898 |
| 2 |
Yes, my job [is/was] closely associated with the oil or gas industry |
309 |
3.7% |
0.037184116 |
| 3 |
No, but previously I have worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely
associated with it |
242 |
2.9% |
0.029121540 |
| 4 |
No |
7401 |
89.1% |
0.890613718 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.2% |
0.002045728 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1337 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1868 |
|
NA |
c27_bgoil_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c27_bgoil
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9647] [Invalid:1868]
[Range:-]
|
c27_bgoily
|
Variable label:
|
When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry?
|
|
Literal question:
|
When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry (or your
first job closely associated with the oil and gas industry)?
Enter the approximate year as best you can remember.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source variables: r26_bgoily, r27_bgoily]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| Sysmiss |
|
11515 |
|
NA |
c27_bgoily_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c27_bgoily
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
c27_bgoily_decade
|
Variable label:
|
Recoded version of [c27_bgoily].
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked this way in r12, most recently in r27. Most
respondents have values from the last year, but it is possible to have
values back to r12. You can filter using the source-variable if you only
want respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r12arbeidolje_2_1, r15_arbeidolje2, r16_arbeidolje2,
r26_bgoily, r27_bgoily_decade]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6753] [Invalid:4762]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1960 - 1969 |
8 |
0.9% |
0.009049774 |
| 2 |
1970 - 1979 |
139 |
15.7% |
0.157239819 |
| 3 |
1980 - 1989 |
253 |
28.6% |
0.286199095 |
| 4 |
1990 - 1999 |
183 |
20.7% |
0.207013575 |
| 5 |
2000 - 2009 |
193 |
21.8% |
0.218325792 |
| 6 |
2010 - 2019 |
93 |
10.5% |
0.105203620 |
| 7 |
2020 or later |
10 |
1.1% |
0.011312217 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005656109 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5869 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
4762 |
|
NA |
c27_bgoily_decade_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c27_bgoily_decade
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6753] [Invalid:4762]
[Range:-]
|
c29_bgind_1
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Public central
administration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Public central administration
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_1, r8k34_1, r9k34_1, r27_bgind_1, r29_bgind_1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
775 |
8.8% |
0.0875211745 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8078 |
91.2% |
0.9122529644 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_2
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in:
Kindergarten/school/teaching
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Kindergarten/school/teaching
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_2, r8k34_2, r9k34_2, r27_bgind_2, r29_bgind_2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1474 |
16.6% |
0.1664596273 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
7379 |
83.3% |
0.8333145116 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_3
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Health services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health services
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_3, r8k34_3, r9k34_3, r27_bgind_3, r29_bgind_3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1097 |
12.4% |
0.1238848108 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
7756 |
87.6% |
0.8758893281 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_4
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Social services/child
protection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social services/child protection
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_4, r8k34_4, r9k34_4, r27_bgind_4, r29_bgind_4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
200 |
2.3% |
0.0225861095 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8653 |
97.7% |
0.9771880294 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_5
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Nursing and care
services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nursing and care services
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_5, r8k34_5, r9k34_5, r27_bgind_5, r29_bgind_5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
397 |
4.5% |
0.0448334274 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8456 |
95.5% |
0.9549407115 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_6
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in:
Defence/police/judicial system/security
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Defence/police/judicial system/security
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_6, r8k34_6, r9k34_6, r27_bgind_6, r29_bgind_6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
298 |
3.4% |
0.0336533032 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8555 |
96.6% |
0.9661208357 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_7
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in:
Agriculture/forestry/fishing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Agriculture/forestry/fishing
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_7, r8k34_7, r9k34_7, r27_bgind_7, r29_bgind_7]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
243 |
2.7% |
0.0274421231 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8610 |
97.2% |
0.9723320158 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_8
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Industry/technology
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Industry/technology
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_8, r8k34_8, r9k34_8, r27_bgind_8, r29_bgind_8]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
742 |
8.4% |
0.0837944664 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8111 |
91.6% |
0.9159796725 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_9
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Building/construction
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Building/construction
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_9, r8k34_9, r9k34_9, r27_bgind_9, r29_bgind_9]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
654 |
7.4% |
0.0738565782 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8199 |
92.6% |
0.9259175607 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_10
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Retailing/shop
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Retailing/shop
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_10, r8k34_10, r9k34_10, r27_bgind_10,
r29_bgind_10]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
450 |
5.1% |
0.0508187465 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8403 |
94.9% |
0.9489553924 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_11
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in:
Transport/communications
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Transport/communications
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_11, r8k34_11, r9k34_11, r27_bgind_11,
r29_bgind_11]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
485 |
5.5% |
0.0547713156 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8368 |
94.5% |
0.9450028233 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_12
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in:
Culture/sport/organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Culture/sport/organisations
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_12, r8k34_12, r9k34_12, r27_bgind_12,
r29_bgind_12]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
367 |
4.1% |
0.0414455110 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8486 |
95.8% |
0.9583286279 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_13
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in:
Media/advertising/PR/information
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Media/advertising/PR/information
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_13, r8k34_13, r9k34_13, r27_bgind_13,
r29_bgind_13]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
270 |
3.0% |
0.0304912479 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8583 |
96.9% |
0.9692828910 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_14
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Research/analysis
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Research/analysis
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_14, r8k34_14, r9k34_14, r27_bgind_14,
r29_bgind_14]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
450 |
5.1% |
0.0508187465 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8403 |
94.9% |
0.9489553924 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_15
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Travel/hotels
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Travel/hotels
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_15, r8k34_15, r9k34_15, r27_bgind_15,
r29_bgind_15]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
132 |
1.5% |
0.0149068323 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8721 |
98.5% |
0.9848673066 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_16
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Restaurants/catering
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Restaurants/catering
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_16, r8k34_16, r9k34_16, r27_bgind_16,
r29_bgind_16]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
87 |
1.0% |
0.0098249577 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8766 |
99.0% |
0.9899491813 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_17
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Telecommunications/IT
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Telecommunications/IT
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_17, r8k34_17, r9k34_17, r27_bgind_17,
r29_bgind_17]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
539 |
6.1% |
0.0608695652 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8314 |
93.9% |
0.9389045737 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_18
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in:
Banking/insurance/finance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Banking/insurance/finance
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_18, r8k34_18, r9k34_18, r27_bgind_18,
r29_bgind_18]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
363 |
4.1% |
0.0409937888 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8490 |
95.9% |
0.9587803501 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_19
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Commercial services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Commercial services
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_19, r8k34_19, r9k34_19, r27_bgind_19,
r29_bgind_19]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
503 |
5.7% |
0.0568040655 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8350 |
94.3% |
0.9429700734 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_20
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Oil/gas
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Oil/gas
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_20, r8k34_20, r9k34_20, r27_bgind_20,
r29_bgind_20]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
574 |
6.5% |
0.0648221344 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8279 |
93.5% |
0.9349520045 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_21
|
Variable label:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry [do/did] you (your company) work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to select up to three answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r29. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k34_21, r8k34_21, r9k34_21, r27_bgind_21,
r29_bgind_21]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
708 |
8.0% |
0.0799548278 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
8145 |
92.0% |
0.9198193111 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002258611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
451 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2209 |
|
NA |
c29_bgind_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c29_bgind
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9306] [Invalid:2209]
[Range:-]
|
c29_bgscp
|
Variable label:
|
What type of business did you work for before you became
[r29_bgscp_mask]?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What type of business did you work for before you became
[r29_bgscp_mask]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked like this in r27, most recently in r29. You can
filter using the source-variable if you only want respondents with the
newer values.
Text from the “other”-field has been coded into the response
categories where possible.
[Source variables: r27_bgscp, r29_bgscp]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8965] [Invalid:2550]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
447 |
11.4% |
0.113509396 |
| 2 |
Other public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1249 |
31.7% |
0.317166074 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
313 |
7.9% |
0.079481971 |
| 4 |
Private business |
1503 |
38.2% |
0.381665820 |
| 5 |
Self-employed |
299 |
7.6% |
0.075926866 |
| 6 |
Other: |
29 |
0.7% |
0.007364144 |
| 7 |
Have not previously been working |
80 |
2.0% |
0.020314881 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.5% |
0.004570848 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5027 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
2550 |
|
NA |
c29_bgscp_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c29_bgscp
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8965] [Invalid:2550]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgchi
|
Variable label:
|
Living with children under 16 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you,
and if so, how many?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r4, most recently in r30. Most respondents
have values from the last two years, but it is possible to have values
back to r4. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r4k42, r5k42, r8k42, r11bk42, r16bk42, r17bk42,
r18bk42, r22bk42, r23bk42, r25_bgchi, r26k2_bgchi, r30_bgchi]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11470] [Invalid:45]
[Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
None |
9294 |
81.4% |
0.8141918528 |
| 1 |
1 |
890 |
7.8% |
0.0779675865 |
| 2 |
2 |
880 |
7.7% |
0.0770915462 |
| 3 |
3 |
252 |
2.2% |
0.0220762155 |
| 4 |
4 |
29 |
0.3% |
0.0025405169 |
| 5 |
5 |
5 |
0.0% |
0.0004380201 |
| 6 |
6 or more |
3 |
0.0% |
0.0002628121 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
62 |
0.5% |
0.0054314498 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
55 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
45 |
|
NA |
c30_bgchi_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgchi
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11470] [Invalid:45]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgcit_2
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship: Another country
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizen of another country. Please write which one:
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question has been asked during new recruitment. From wave, it is
possible to choose more than one country at this question. Bef, only one
option was possible.
[Source variables: w01_k28, w03_r3k28, r4k28, r5k28, r8k28, r11bk28,
r14bk28, r16bk28, r18bk28, r22bk28, r25_bgcit, r30_bgcit2_2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11490] [Invalid:25]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
592 |
5.2% |
0.051875219 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
10737 |
94.1% |
0.940851735 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
0.7% |
0.007273046 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
78 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
25 |
|
NA |
c30_bgcit_1
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship: Norwegian citizen
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian citizen
|
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question has been asked during new recruitment. From wave, it is
possible to choose more than one country at this question. Bef, only one
option was possible.
[Source variables: w01_k28, w03_r3k28, r4k28, r5k28, r8k28, r11bk28,
r14bk28, r16bk28, r18bk28, r22bk28, r25_bgcit, r30_bgcit2_1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11490] [Invalid:25]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
10782 |
94.5% |
0.944794953 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
547 |
4.8% |
0.047932001 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
83 |
0.7% |
0.007273046 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
78 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
25 |
|
NA |
c30_bgcit_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgcit
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11490] [Invalid:25]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgciv
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your marital status?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on what is most suitable to you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked this way in r14, most recently in r30. Most
respondents have values from the last two years, but it is possible to
have values back to r14. You can filter using the source-variable if you
only want respondents with the newer values.
Text from the “other”-field has been coded into the response
categories where possible.
[Source variables: r14bk27_kodet, r16bk27_kodet, r18bk27, r22bk27_kodet,
r23bk27_kodet, r25_bgciv, r26_bgciv, r27_bgciv, r29_bgciv, r30_bgciv]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11394] [Invalid:121]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Single |
1730 |
15.3% |
0.153165117 |
| 2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
664 |
5.9% |
0.058787074 |
| 3 |
Cohabitant |
1707 |
15.1% |
0.151128818 |
| 4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
6129 |
54.3% |
0.542629482 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
587 |
5.2% |
0.051969898 |
| 6 |
Widow/widower |
437 |
3.9% |
0.038689686 |
| 7 |
Other: |
19 |
0.2% |
0.001682160 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
0.2% |
0.001947764 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
99 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
121 |
|
NA |
c30_bgciv_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgciv
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11394] [Invalid:121]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgcla
|
Variable label:
|
Social class, personal placement.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups
or classes.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it
be?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r10, most recently in r30. Most respondents
have values from the last two years, but it is possible to have values
back to r10. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r10pad13, r11pkklasse, r14pkklasse, r16pkklasse,
r18pkklasse, r22pkklasse, r23pkklasse, r25_bgcla, r29_bgcla, r30_bgcla]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11452] [Invalid:63]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Lower class |
139 |
1.2% |
0.012274815 |
| 2 |
Working class |
1558 |
13.8% |
0.137583893 |
| 3 |
Lower middle class |
1283 |
11.3% |
0.113299188 |
| 4 |
Middle class |
6186 |
54.6% |
0.546273402 |
| 5 |
Upper middle class |
1682 |
14.9% |
0.148534087 |
| 6 |
Upper class |
43 |
0.4% |
0.003797245 |
| 7 |
Don't know |
379 |
3.3% |
0.033468739 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
54 |
0.5% |
0.004768633 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
128 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
63 |
|
NA |
c30_bgcla_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgcla
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11452] [Invalid:63]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgday
|
Variable label:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last seven days?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last seven days?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one alternative.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked this way in r14, most recently in r30. Most
respondents have values from the last year, but it is possible to have
values back to r14. You can filter using the source-variable if you only
want respondents with the newer values.
Text from the “other”-field has been coded into the response
categories where possible.
[Source variables: r14bk33_kodet, r16bk33_kodet, r17bk33_kodet,
r18bk33_kodet, r22bk33_kodet, r25_bgday, r26_bgday, r27_bgday,
r29_bgday, r30_bgday]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11427] [Invalid:88]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
4876 |
42.9% |
0.428847845 |
| 2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
362 |
3.2% |
0.031838171 |
| 3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
421 |
3.7% |
0.037027265 |
| 4 |
Self-employed |
451 |
4.0% |
0.039665787 |
| 5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
453 |
4.0% |
0.039841689 |
| 6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
81 |
0.7% |
0.007124011 |
| 7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
47 |
0.4% |
0.004133685 |
| 8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
656 |
5.8% |
0.057695690 |
| 9 |
Retired |
3860 |
33.9% |
0.339489886 |
| 10 |
In military service |
12 |
0.1% |
0.001055409 |
| 11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
60 |
0.5% |
0.005277045 |
| 12 |
Other: |
69 |
0.6% |
0.006068602 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
22 |
0.2% |
0.001934916 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
57 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
88 |
|
NA |
c30_bgday_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgday
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11427] [Invalid:88]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgedu
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the highest level of completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question has been asked regularly since r1. Most respondents have values
from the last year, but it is possible to have values back to r1. You
can filter using the source-variable if you only want respondents with
the newer values. This variable is the same as r30_P4_2.
Text from the “other”-field is coded into the answer categories where
possible.
[Source variables: w01_k26, w03_r3k26, r4k26, r5k26, r6k26, r8k26,
r9k26, r11bk26_kodet, r14bk26_kodet, r16bk26_kodet, r17bk26_kodet,
r18bk26_kodet, r20bk26, r22bk26_kodet, r25_bgedu, r26k2_bgedu,
r27_bgedu, r29_bgedu, r30_bgedu]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11493] [Invalid:22]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
31 |
0.3% |
0.002697294 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
478 |
4.2% |
0.041590533 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
1184 |
10.3% |
0.103019229 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1365 |
11.9% |
0.118767946 |
| 5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
988 |
8.6% |
0.085965370 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
993 |
8.6% |
0.086400418 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2291 |
19.9% |
0.199338728 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
876 |
7.6% |
0.076220308 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
841 |
7.3% |
0.073174976 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors, or longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of
Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of
Science in Business and Economics)) |
2027 |
17.6% |
0.176368224 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
339 |
2.9% |
0.029496215 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
34 |
0.3% |
0.002958322 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
46 |
0.4% |
0.004002436 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
22 |
|
NA |
c30_bgedu_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgedu
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11493] [Invalid:22]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgedu3
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the highest level of completed education?
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select
the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Aggregated variable, based on c30_bgedu
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question has been asked regularly since r1. Most respondents have values
from the last year, but it is possible to have values back to r1. You
can filter using the source-variable if you only want respondents with
the newer values. This variable is the same as r30_P4_1.
Text from the “other”-field is coded into the answer categories where
possible.
[Source variables: w01_k26, w03_r3k26, r4k26, r5k26, r6k26, r8k26,
r9k26, r11bk26_kodet, r14bk26_kodet, r16bk26_kodet, r17bk26_kodet,
r18bk26_kodet, r20bk26, r22bk26_kodet, r25_bgedu, r26k2_bgedu,
r27_bgedu, r29_bgedu, r30_bgedu]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11493] [Invalid:22]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
509 |
4.4% |
0.04428783 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
3540 |
30.8% |
0.30801357 |
| 3 |
University/University college |
7367 |
64.1% |
0.64099887 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
77 |
0.7% |
0.00669973 |
| Sysmiss |
|
22 |
|
NA |
c30_bgedu3_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgedu3
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11493] [Invalid:22]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bghea
|
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r2, most recently in r30. Most respondents
have values from the last two years, but it is possible to have values
back to r2. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: w02_hp1, w03_r3hp1, r8hp1, r9hp1, r11bkhelse,
r14bkhelse, r16bkhelse, r18bkhelse, r20bkhelse, r22bkhelse, r23bkhelse,
r25_bghea, r26_bghea, r27_bghea, r29_bghea, r30_bghea]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11492] [Invalid:23]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
1397 |
12.2% |
0.121679296 |
| 2 |
Very good |
3607 |
31.4% |
0.314171239 |
| 3 |
Good |
4220 |
36.8% |
0.367563801 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
1751 |
15.3% |
0.152512847 |
| 5 |
Poor |
462 |
4.0% |
0.040240397 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
0.4% |
0.003832419 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
11 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
23 |
|
NA |
c30_bghea_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bghea
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11492] [Invalid:23]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgimm
|
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question has been asked during new recruitment.
[Source variables: w01_k29, w03_r3k29, r4k29, r5k29, r11bk29, r14bk29,
r16bk29, r18bk29, r22bk29, r25_bgimm, r30_bgimm]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11468] [Invalid:47]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
10098 |
89.8% |
0.897919260 |
| 2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
621 |
5.5% |
0.055219634 |
| 3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
64 |
0.6% |
0.005690912 |
| 4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
225 |
2.0% |
0.020007114 |
| 5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
160 |
1.4% |
0.014227281 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
78 |
0.7% |
0.006935799 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
222 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
47 |
|
NA |
c30_bgimm_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgimm
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11468] [Invalid:47]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bginc_v2
|
Variable label:
|
Current gross annual income?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked this way in r29, most recently in r30. Before
r29 the response scale was somewhat different. If you want data on as
many as possible, recode c26_bginc and combine with c30_bginc_v2.
[Source variables: r29_bginc_v2, r30_bginc_v2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10495] [Invalid:1020]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than 300 000 NOK |
1156 |
12.0% |
0.11970591 |
| 2 |
300 001 - 400 000 NOK |
1363 |
14.1% |
0.14114114 |
| 3 |
400 001 - 500 000 NOK |
1424 |
14.7% |
0.14745780 |
| 4 |
500 001 - 600 000 NOK |
1252 |
13.0% |
0.12964689 |
| 5 |
600 001 - 700 000 NOK |
1187 |
12.3% |
0.12291602 |
| 6 |
700 001 - 800 000 NOK |
917 |
9.5% |
0.09495703 |
| 7 |
800 001 - 900 000 NOK |
629 |
6.5% |
0.06513410 |
| 8 |
900 001 - 1 000 000 NOK |
489 |
5.1% |
0.05063684 |
| 9 |
1 000 001 - 1 300 000 NOK |
599 |
6.2% |
0.06202754 |
| 10 |
More than 1 300 000 NOK |
461 |
4.8% |
0.04773739 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
180 |
1.9% |
0.01863933 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
838 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1020 |
|
NA |
c30_bginc_v2_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bginc_v2
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10495] [Invalid:1020]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgjsc
|
Variable label:
|
What type of business [did/do] you work in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What type of business [did/do] you work in?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r18, most recently in r30. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r18. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values. From round 30, the question has two
options for the private sector (commercial and non-profit), which are
combined in this combined variable. See r30_bgjsc for all the
options.
Text from the “other”-field has been coded into the response
categories where possible.
[Source variables: r18bk21_kodet, r22bk21_kodet, r23bk21_kodet,
r25_bgwor, r26_bgsct, r27_bgsct, r29_bgsct, r30_bgjsc]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11361] [Invalid:154]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
1304 |
12.9% |
0.1294421283 |
| 2 |
Other public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
3008 |
29.9% |
0.2985904308 |
| 3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
694 |
6.9% |
0.0688902124 |
| 4 |
Private company, commercial |
4658 |
46.2% |
0.4623783998 |
| 5 |
Private company, non-profit |
355 |
3.5% |
0.0352392297 |
| 6 |
Self-employed |
46 |
0.5% |
0.0045662100 |
| 7 |
Other: |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.1% |
0.0008933889 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1287 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
154 |
|
NA |
c30_bgjsc_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgjsc
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11361] [Invalid:154]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bglrs
|
Variable label:
|
Personal placement on political left and right wing scale
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right
wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left
politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r1, most recently in r30. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r1. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: w01_k8_1, w02_k207_1, w03_r3k8_1, r4k8_1, r5k8_1,
r8k8_1, r9k8_1, r10k8_1, r11pk8_1, r14pk8_1, r16pk8_1, r18pk8, r20pk8,
r22pk8, r25_bglrs, r26k2_bglrs, r28_bglrs, r29_bglrs, r30_bglrs]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11428] [Invalid:87]
[Range:0-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Left wing |
272 |
2.4% |
0.02380743982 |
| 1 |
1 |
661 |
5.8% |
0.05785557987 |
| 2 |
2 |
1373 |
12.0% |
0.12017505470 |
| 3 |
3 |
1581 |
13.8% |
0.13838074398 |
| 4 |
4 |
1251 |
10.9% |
0.10949671772 |
| 5 |
5 |
1525 |
13.3% |
0.13347921225 |
| 6 |
6 |
1182 |
10.3% |
0.10345733042 |
| 7 |
7 |
1476 |
12.9% |
0.12919037199 |
| 8 |
8 |
1346 |
11.8% |
0.11781181619 |
| 9 |
9 |
523 |
4.6% |
0.04577680525 |
| 10 |
10 - Right wing |
223 |
2.0% |
0.01951859956 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.1% |
0.00096280088 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3 |
|
NA |
| 99 |
|
1 |
0.0% |
0.00008752735 |
| Sysmiss |
|
87 |
|
NA |
c30_bglrs_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bglrs
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11428] [Invalid:87]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgrel
|
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source variables: r30_bgrel]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 3 |
The Orthodox Church (Greek, Russian, others) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 4 |
Other Protestant religious communities (e.g. free churches, Anglican churches,
Pentecostal church and others) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 5 |
Other Christian denominations (e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses, The Latter-day Saints
and others) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 6 |
Mosaic Religious Community (Jewish) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 7 |
Islamic (Muslim) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 8 |
Eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism,
Confucianism) |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 9 |
Other religions |
0 |
|
NaN |
| 10 |
Do not belong to any religion or religious denominations |
0 |
|
NaN |
| Sysmiss |
|
11515 |
|
NA |
c30_bgrel_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgrel
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:11515]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgrel_recode
|
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [Recoded]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question at
least once, some have been asked several times. Here you will find the
respondent’s most recent value. You can filter using the source-variable
if you only want respondents with the newer values. The variable is
aggregated, see “c30_bgrel” for original response options.
[Source variables: r4k40_recode, r5k40_recode, r11bk40_recode,
r14bk40_recode, r16bk40_recode, r18bk40_recode, r22bk40_recode,
r25_bgrelrecode, r30_bgrel_recode]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11394] [Invalid:121]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Church of Norway |
6764 |
60.8% |
0.608492263 |
| 2 |
The Catholic Church |
119 |
1.1% |
0.010705290 |
| 3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
429 |
3.9% |
0.038593019 |
| 4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
78 |
0.7% |
0.007016913 |
| 5 |
Islam |
57 |
0.5% |
0.005127744 |
| 6 |
Do not belong to any religion or religious denominations |
3606 |
32.4% |
0.324397265 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
0.6% |
0.005667506 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
278 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
121 |
|
NA |
c30_bgrel_recode_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgrel_recode
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11394] [Invalid:121]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgrem2
|
Variable label:
|
Participation in religious meetings
|
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often
have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question at
least once. The question was first asked in r16, most recently in r30.
Here you will find the respondent’s most recent value. You can filter
using the source-variable if you only want respondents with the newer
values.
In r30, the wording was slightly changed. Refer to the previous
dataset to find the previous wording.
[Source variables: r16bk41, r18bk41, r22bk41, r25_bgrem, r30_bgrem2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11341] [Invalid:174]
[Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Approximately every day |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0003189284 |
| 2 |
More than once a week |
71 |
1.1% |
0.0113219582 |
| 3 |
Approximately once a week |
120 |
1.9% |
0.0191357040 |
| 4 |
Once or a few times a month |
223 |
3.6% |
0.0355605167 |
| 5 |
Several times a year |
585 |
9.3% |
0.0932865572 |
| 6 |
Once |
780 |
12.4% |
0.1243820762 |
| 7 |
I attend religious meetings less than once a year |
1101 |
17.6% |
0.1755700845 |
| 8 |
I never attend religious meetings |
3326 |
53.0% |
0.5303779302 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
1.0% |
0.0100462446 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5070 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
174 |
|
NA |
c30_bgrem2_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgrem2
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11341] [Invalid:174]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgupc
|
Variable label:
|
Respondents home county at 15 years of age
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable. Each respondent has been asked this question once.
The question is asked in round 17, 18, 22, 25 and 30.
[Source variables: r17oppvekstfylke, r18oppvekstfylke, r22oppvekstfylke,
r25_bgupc, r30_bgupc]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:integer] [Valid:9286] [Invalid:2229]
[Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
981 |
10.6% |
0.10564290 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
875 |
9.4% |
0.09422787 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
537 |
5.8% |
0.05782899 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
547 |
5.9% |
0.05890588 |
| 31 |
Østfold |
428 |
4.6% |
0.04609089 |
| 32 |
Akershus |
1035 |
11.1% |
0.11145811 |
| 33 |
Buskerud |
399 |
4.3% |
0.04296791 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
653 |
7.0% |
0.07032091 |
| 39 |
Vestfold |
423 |
4.6% |
0.04555244 |
| 40 |
Telemark |
284 |
3.1% |
0.03058367 |
| 42 |
Agder |
493 |
5.3% |
0.05309067 |
| 46 |
Vestland |
1393 |
15.0% |
0.15001077 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
798 |
8.6% |
0.08593582 |
| 55 |
Troms - Romsa - Tromssa |
319 |
3.4% |
0.03435279 |
| 56 |
Finnmark - Finnmárku - Finmarkku |
121 |
1.3% |
0.01303037 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2229 |
|
NA |
c30_bgupc_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgupc
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9286] [Invalid:2229]
[Range:-]
|
c30_bgurb
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r6, most recently in r30. Most respondents
have values from the last year, but it is possible to have values back
to r6. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: r6k35, r7k35, r11bk35, r14bk35, r16bk35, r18bk35,
r20bk35, r22bk35, r23bk35, r25_bgurb, r26k2_bgurb, r27_bgurb, r29_bgurb,
r30_bgurb]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11462] [Invalid:53]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
2921 |
25.6% |
0.255533199 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
2340 |
20.5% |
0.204706500 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
3210 |
28.1% |
0.280815327 |
| 4 |
A village |
1705 |
14.9% |
0.149155804 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
1219 |
10.7% |
0.106639839 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
36 |
0.3% |
0.003149331 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
31 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
53 |
|
NA |
c30_bgurb_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_bgurb
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11462] [Invalid:53]
[Range:-]
|
c30_pcpin
|
Variable label:
|
How interested are you in politics?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked in r1, most recently in r30. Most respondents
have values from the last three years, but it is possible to have values
back to r1. You can filter using the source-variable if you only want
respondents with the newer values.
[Source variables: w01_k1, w03_r3k1, r5k1, r8k1, r9k1, r10k1, r11pk1,
r14pk1, r20pk1, r22pk1, r25_pcpin, r26_pcpin, r30_pcpin]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11434] [Invalid:81]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
1767 |
15.7% |
0.157318376 |
| 2 |
Interested |
5381 |
47.9% |
0.479077635 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
3185 |
28.4% |
0.283564815 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
762 |
6.8% |
0.067841880 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
119 |
1.1% |
0.010594729 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.2% |
0.001602564 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
202 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
81 |
|
NA |
c30_pcpin_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c30_pcpin
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11434] [Invalid:81]
[Range:-]
|
c31_pcpar
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
Combined variable, with the respondent’s most recent value. The
question was first asked this way in r14, most recently in r31. Most
respondents have values from the last year, but it is possible to have
values back to r14. You can filter using the source-variabel if you want
data from specific waves.
Text from the “other”-field has been coded into the response
categories where possible.
[Source variables: r14pk204, r16pk204_kodet, r17pk204_kodet, r18pk204,
r19pk204_kodet, r20pk204_kodet, r21pk204, r23pk204_kodet, r24_pcpar,
r26k2_pcpar, r27_pcpar, r28_pcpar, r29_pcpar, r30_pcpar, r31_pcpar]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-13]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
328 |
2.8% |
0.0284845853 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
2344 |
20.4% |
0.2035605732 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
1732 |
15.0% |
0.1504125054 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
783 |
6.8% |
0.0679982631 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1516 |
13.2% |
0.1316543639 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
377 |
3.3% |
0.0327399045 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
540 |
4.7% |
0.0468953539 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1766 |
15.3% |
0.1533651759 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
706 |
6.1% |
0.0613113330 |
| 10 |
The Industry and Business Party |
228 |
2.0% |
0.0198002605 |
| 11 |
Would not vote |
408 |
3.5% |
0.0354320452 |
| 12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
178 |
1.5% |
0.0154580981 |
| 13 |
Not entitled to vote |
606 |
5.3% |
0.0526270083 |
| 14 |
Other: |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.0% |
0.0002605297 |
c31_pcpar_source
|
Variable label:
|
Source for c31_pcpar
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11515] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r27_pcsex
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted
sexual attention?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following assertion:
It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention.
|
|
Field period:
|
02.06.2023 - 22.06.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r27_group = 3)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7724] [Invalid:3791]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
12 |
0.8% |
0.007936508 |
| 2 |
Agree |
37 |
2.4% |
0.024470899 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
161 |
10.6% |
0.106481481 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
113 |
7.5% |
0.074735450 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
186 |
12.3% |
0.123015873 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
478 |
31.6% |
0.316137566 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
522 |
34.5% |
0.345238095 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001984127 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6212 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
3791 |
|
NA |
r27_bgcha_0
|
Variable label:
|
Number of children: I do not have any children
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children,
foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the
children?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I do not have any children
|
|
Field period:
|
02.06.2023 - 22.06.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_1 - r27_bgcha_7], and
[r27_bgchao].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7724] [Invalid:3791]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Selected |
1580 |
20.5% |
0.204557224 |
| 0 |
Not selected |
6071 |
78.6% |
0.785991714 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
73 |
0.9% |
0.009451062 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3791 |
|
NA |
r27_bgcha_1
|
Variable label:
|
Number of children: 0-5 years old
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children,
foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the
children?
|
|
Literal question:
|
0-5 years old
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age
categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left
empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
|
|
Field period:
|
02.06.2023 - 22.06.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7], and
[r27_bgchao].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:454]
[Invalid:11061] [Range:0-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
17 |
3.7% |
0.037444934 |
| 1 |
1 |
291 |
64.1% |
0.640969163 |
| 2 |
2 |
132 |
29.1% |
0.290748899 |
| 3 |
3 |
10 |
2.2% |
0.022026432 |
| 4 |
4 |
3 |
0.7% |
0.006607930 |
| 5 |
5 |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002202643 |
| Sysmiss |
|
11061 |
|
NA |
r27_bgcha_2
|
Variable label:
|
Number of children: 6-10 years old
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children,
foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the
children?
|
|
Literal question:
|
6-10 years old
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age
categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left
empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
|
|
Field period:
|
02.06.2023 - 22.06.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7], and
[r27_bgchao].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:528]
[Invalid:10987] [Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
18 |
3.4% |
0.034090909 |
| 1 |
1 |
386 |
73.1% |
0.731060606 |
| 2 |
2 |
111 |
21.0% |
0.210227273 |
| 3 |
3 |
11 |
2.1% |
0.020833333 |
| 6 |
6 |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001893939 |
| 10 |
10 |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001893939 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10987 |
|
NA |
r27_bgcha_3
|
Variable label:
|
Number of children: 11-15 years old
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children,
foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the
children?
|
|
Literal question:
|
11-15 years old
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age
categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left
empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
|
|
Field period:
|
02.06.2023 - 22.06.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7], and
[r27_bgchao].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:697]
[Invalid:10818] [Range:0-14]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
15 |
2.2% |
0.02152080 |
| 1 |
1 |
503 |
72.2% |
0.72166428 |
| 2 |
2 |
159 |
22.8% |
0.22812052 |
| 3 |
3 |
15 |
2.2% |
0.02152080 |
| 4 |
4 |
2 |
0.3% |
0.00286944 |
| 5 |
5 |
2 |
0.3% |
0.00286944 |
| 12 |
12 |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 14 |
14 |
1 |
0.1% |
0.00143472 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10818 |
|
NA |
r27_bgcha_4
|
Variable label:
|
Number of children: 16-20 years old
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children,
foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the
children?
|
|
Literal question:
|
16-20 years old
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age
categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left
empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
|
|
Field period:
|
02.06.2023 - 22.06.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7], and
[r27_bgchao].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:816]
[Invalid:10699] [Range:0-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
17 |
2.1% |
0.020833333 |
| 1 |
1 |
614 |
75.2% |
0.752450980 |
| 2 |
2 |
172 |
21.1% |
0.210784314 |
| 3 |
3 |
9 |
1.1% |
0.011029412 |
| 4 |
4 |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004901961 |
| 10 |
10 |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10699 |
|
NA |
r27_bgcha_5
|
Variable label:
|
Number of children: 21-30 years old
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children,
foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the
children?
|
|
Literal question:
|
21-30 years old
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age
categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left
empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
|
|
Field period:
|
02.06.2023 - 22.06.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7], and
[r27_bgchao].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1943]
[Invalid:9572] [Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
14 |
0.7% |
0.007205353 |
| 1 |
1 |
999 |
51.4% |
0.514153371 |
| 2 |
2 |
710 |
36.5% |
0.365414308 |
| 3 |
3 |
172 |
8.9% |
0.088522903 |
| 4 |
4 |
41 |
2.1% |
0.021101390 |
| 5 |
5 |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003088008 |
| 6 |
6 |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000514668 |
| 8 |
8 |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| Sysmiss |
|
9572 |
|
NA |
r27_bgcha_6
|
Variable label:
|
Number of children: 31-50 years old
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children,
foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the
children?
|
|
Literal question:
|
31-50 years old
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age
categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left
empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
|
|
Field period:
|
02.06.2023 - 22.06.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_7], and
[r27_bgchao].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3377]
[Invalid:8138] [Range:0-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
11 |
0.3% |
0.003257329 |
| 1 |
1 |
1034 |
30.6% |
0.306188925 |
| 2 |
2 |
1506 |
44.6% |
0.445957951 |
| 3 |
3 |
670 |
19.8% |
0.198400948 |
| 4 |
4 |
123 |
3.6% |
0.036422861 |
| 5 |
5 |
23 |
0.7% |
0.006810779 |
| 6 |
6 |
6 |
0.2% |
0.001776725 |
| 7 |
7 |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001184483 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8138 |
|
NA |
r27_bgcha_7
|
Variable label:
|
Number of children: 51 years old and above
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you have children (your own children, stepchildren, adopted children,
foster children, the children of a partner, etc.), how old are the
children?
|
|
Literal question:
|
51 years old and above
|
|
Post-question:
|
If you have children, please enter how many children you have in the age
categories below. If you don’t have any children, the fields may be left
empty. Use whole numbers, not letters.
|
|
Field period:
|
02.06.2023 - 22.06.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Shown on the same page as [r27_bgcha_0 - r27_bgcha_6], and
[r27_bgchao].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:739]
[Invalid:10776] [Range:0-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
18 |
2.4% |
0.02435724 |
| 1 |
1 |
326 |
44.1% |
0.44113667 |
| 2 |
2 |
294 |
39.8% |
0.39783491 |
| 3 |
3 |
84 |
11.4% |
0.11366712 |
| 4 |
4 |
14 |
1.9% |
0.01894452 |
| 5 |
5 |
2 |
0.3% |
0.00270636 |
| 6 |
6 |
1 |
0.1% |
0.00135318 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10776 |
|
NA |
r28_pcvot23m
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the municipal
elections this autumn?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the municipal
elections this autumn?
|
|
Field period:
|
23.10.2023 - 12.11.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[The order for the alternatives ‘A joint party list’, ‘A local list’,
‘’Would cast a blank vote’, ‘Did not vote’, ‘Not entitled to vote’, and
‘Other’ was not randomized, but kept at the bottom after the other
alternatives.]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8023] [Invalid:3492]
[Range:1-17]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
272 |
3.4% |
0.033902530 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1911 |
23.8% |
0.238190203 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
553 |
6.9% |
0.068926835 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
467 |
5.8% |
0.058207653 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
823 |
10.3% |
0.102580082 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
415 |
5.2% |
0.051726287 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
456 |
5.7% |
0.056836595 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1571 |
19.6% |
0.195812040 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
389 |
4.8% |
0.048485604 |
| 10 |
People's Party FNB |
13 |
0.2% |
0.001620342 |
| 11 |
The Industry and Business Party |
261 |
3.3% |
0.032531472 |
| 12 |
A joint party list |
17 |
0.2% |
0.002118908 |
| 13 |
A local list |
159 |
2.0% |
0.019818023 |
| 14 |
Would cast a blank vote |
100 |
1.2% |
0.012464166 |
| 15 |
Did not vote |
389 |
4.8% |
0.048485604 |
| 16 |
Not entitled to vote |
10 |
0.1% |
0.001246417 |
| 17 |
Other: |
184 |
2.3% |
0.022934065 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.4% |
0.004113175 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3492 |
|
NA |
r28_pcvot23c
|
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council
election this autumn?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council
election this autumn?
|
|
Field period:
|
23.10.2023 - 12.11.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
[The order for the alternatives ‘A joint party list’, ‘A local list’,
‘’Would cast a blank vote’, ‘Did not vote’, ‘Not entitled to vote’, and
‘Other’ was not randomized, but kept at the bottom after the other
alternatives.]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8023] [Invalid:3492]
[Range:1-17]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
255 |
3.2% |
0.0317836221 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1839 |
22.9% |
0.2292160040 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
526 |
6.6% |
0.0655615107 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
402 |
5.0% |
0.0501059454 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
809 |
10.1% |
0.1008350991 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
402 |
5.0% |
0.0501059454 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
458 |
5.7% |
0.0570858781 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1483 |
18.5% |
0.1848435747 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
422 |
5.3% |
0.0525987785 |
| 10 |
People's Party FNB |
12 |
0.1% |
0.0014956999 |
| 11 |
The Industry and Business Party |
329 |
4.1% |
0.0410071046 |
| 12 |
A joint party list |
4 |
0.0% |
0.0004985666 |
| 13 |
A local list |
75 |
0.9% |
0.0093481241 |
| 14 |
Would cast a blank vote |
130 |
1.6% |
0.0162034152 |
| 15 |
Did not vote |
582 |
7.3% |
0.0725414434 |
| 16 |
Not entitled to vote |
33 |
0.4% |
0.0041131746 |
| 17 |
Other: |
207 |
2.6% |
0.0258008226 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
55 |
0.7% |
0.0068552910 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3492 |
|
NA |
r28_pcter
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Field period:
|
23.10.2023 - 12.11.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8023] [Invalid:3492]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
335 |
4.2% |
0.04175495 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
1179 |
14.7% |
0.14695251 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
3640 |
45.4% |
0.45369563 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
2461 |
30.7% |
0.30674311 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
321 |
4.0% |
0.04000997 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
1.1% |
0.01084382 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3492 |
|
NA |
r28_pcrur
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for
non-urban/rural Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?:
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Field period:
|
23.10.2023 - 12.11.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8023] [Invalid:3492]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1088 |
13.6% |
0.13561012 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1762 |
22.0% |
0.21961860 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1982 |
24.7% |
0.24703976 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1333 |
16.6% |
0.16614733 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
788 |
9.8% |
0.09821762 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
724 |
9.0% |
0.09024056 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
262 |
3.3% |
0.03265611 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
84 |
1.0% |
0.01046990 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3492 |
|
NA |
r28_pcscc
|
Variable label:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Field period:
|
23.10.2023 - 12.11.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8023] [Invalid:3492]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I don’t believe that the climate is changing. |
58 |
0.7% |
0.007229216 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
261 |
3.3% |
0.032531472 |
| 3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent
due to human action |
1674 |
20.9% |
0.208650131 |
| 4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to
human action. |
5946 |
74.1% |
0.741119282 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
84 |
1.0% |
0.010469899 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3492 |
|
NA |
r28_pcwcc
|
Variable label:
|
How worried are you about climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How worried are you about climate change?
|
|
Field period:
|
23.10.2023 - 12.11.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[The question was exposed to respondents in order dependent on
[r28_group]. If [r28_group] == 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 it was displayed after
[r28_pcscc]. If [r28_group] == 2 it was displayed after [r28_cehfu].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8023] [Invalid:3492]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all worried |
381 |
4.7% |
0.04748847 |
| 2 |
Not very worried |
1109 |
13.8% |
0.13822760 |
| 3 |
Somewhat worried |
2222 |
27.7% |
0.27695376 |
| 4 |
Worried |
2661 |
33.2% |
0.33167144 |
| 5 |
Very worried |
1563 |
19.5% |
0.19481491 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
87 |
1.1% |
0.01084382 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3492 |
|
NA |
r28_pccar
|
Variable label:
|
Proposal that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run
on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private
vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from
2025.
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
|
Post-question:
|
See National Transport Plan 2018-2029, p. 16, available here: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-33-20162017/id2546287/
|
|
Field period:
|
23.10.2023 - 12.11.2023
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8023] [Invalid:3492]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run
on hydrogen. |
2519 |
31.4% |
0.31397233 |
| 2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol. |
5400 |
67.3% |
0.67306494 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
104 |
1.3% |
0.01296273 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3492 |
|
NA |
r29_bgscp_mask
|
Variable label:
|
Selects text piping for [r29_bgscp].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Selects text piping for [r29_bgscp].
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:606] [Invalid:10909]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
a student |
25 |
4.1% |
0.041254125 |
| 2 |
unemployed |
13 |
2.1% |
0.021452145 |
| 3 |
permanently ill or disabled |
78 |
12.9% |
0.128712871 |
| 4 |
retired |
489 |
80.7% |
0.806930693 |
| 5 |
a stay-at-home parent or caregiver |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001650165 |
| Sysmiss |
|
10909 |
|
NA |
r29_pccos
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament
(Stortinget)?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
435 |
5.3% |
0.052958364 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
3383 |
41.2% |
0.411857804 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
3071 |
37.4% |
0.373873874 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
948 |
11.5% |
0.115412710 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
301 |
3.7% |
0.036644753 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
76 |
0.9% |
0.009252496 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pccop
|
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian
politicians?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
146 |
1.8% |
0.017774531 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
2463 |
30.0% |
0.299853908 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
3692 |
44.9% |
0.449476504 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
1465 |
17.8% |
0.178354030 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
417 |
5.1% |
0.050766983 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
31 |
0.4% |
0.003774044 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pccom
|
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very high degree |
367 |
4.5% |
0.044679815 |
| 2 |
A high degree |
3346 |
40.7% |
0.407353299 |
| 3 |
Some degree |
3281 |
39.9% |
0.399439981 |
| 4 |
A low degree |
916 |
11.2% |
0.111516922 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
252 |
3.1% |
0.030679328 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
52 |
0.6% |
0.006330655 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pccoo
|
Variable label:
|
Most people in general can be trusted
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
35 |
0.4% |
0.004261018 |
| 1 |
1 |
66 |
0.8% |
0.008035062 |
| 2 |
2 |
134 |
1.6% |
0.016313611 |
| 3 |
3 |
305 |
3.7% |
0.037131726 |
| 4 |
4 |
320 |
3.9% |
0.038957877 |
| 5 |
5 |
633 |
7.7% |
0.077063550 |
| 6 |
6 |
851 |
10.4% |
0.103603604 |
| 7 |
7 |
2082 |
25.3% |
0.253469686 |
| 8 |
8 |
2613 |
31.8% |
0.318115413 |
| 9 |
9 |
887 |
10.8% |
0.107986365 |
| 10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
262 |
3.2% |
0.031896762 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.3% |
0.003165327 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcsaf
|
Variable label:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has your local environment become
|
|
Literal question:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the
past couple of years.
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much safer |
58 |
0.7% |
0.007061115 |
| 2 |
Somewhat safer |
319 |
3.9% |
0.038836133 |
| 3 |
No change in safety |
6027 |
73.4% |
0.733747261 |
| 4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
1624 |
19.8% |
0.197711225 |
| 5 |
Much more unsafe |
172 |
2.1% |
0.020939859 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.2% |
0.001704407 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcpri
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The authorities should introduce more measures to
protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may
be at the expense of privacy.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
proposition:
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from
potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of
privacy.
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
641 |
7.8% |
0.078037497 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1920 |
23.4% |
0.233747261 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2621 |
31.9% |
0.319089360 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1020 |
12.4% |
0.124178232 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1046 |
12.7% |
0.127343560 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
641 |
7.8% |
0.078037497 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
276 |
3.4% |
0.033601169 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
49 |
0.6% |
0.005965425 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcsad
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
865 |
10.5% |
0.105308011 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
3955 |
48.1% |
0.481495009 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2200 |
26.8% |
0.267835403 |
| 4 |
Dissatisfied |
898 |
10.9% |
0.109325542 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
282 |
3.4% |
0.034331629 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.2% |
0.001704407 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcimm
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
291 |
3.5% |
0.035427319 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
1476 |
18.0% |
0.179693207 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
3509 |
42.7% |
0.427197468 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1033 |
12.6% |
0.125760896 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1232 |
15.0% |
0.149987826 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
411 |
5.0% |
0.050036523 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
214 |
2.6% |
0.026053080 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.6% |
0.005843682 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcref
|
Variable label:
|
Your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and
their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is
today, do you mean it should be:
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much easier |
116 |
1.4% |
0.014122230 |
| 2 |
Easier |
551 |
6.7% |
0.067080594 |
| 3 |
Somewhat easier |
1172 |
14.3% |
0.142683224 |
| 4 |
Same as today |
3384 |
41.2% |
0.411979547 |
| 5 |
Slightly more difficult |
1599 |
19.5% |
0.194667641 |
| 6 |
More difficult |
746 |
9.1% |
0.090820550 |
| 7 |
Much more difficult |
589 |
7.2% |
0.071706842 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
0.7% |
0.006939372 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcmsc
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It should be possible for parents to send their children
to Muslim schools.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian
schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the
Christian faith.
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents
to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national
curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
173 |
2.1% |
0.021061602 |
| 2 |
Agree |
824 |
10.0% |
0.100316533 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1062 |
12.9% |
0.129291454 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1365 |
16.6% |
0.166179693 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1126 |
13.7% |
0.137083029 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1626 |
19.8% |
0.197954711 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1987 |
24.2% |
0.241904066 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
51 |
0.6% |
0.006208912 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcint
|
Variable label:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian
society for integrating refugees?
|
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian
society for integrating refugees?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
361 |
4.4% |
0.043949355 |
| 2 |
Good |
2130 |
25.9% |
0.259313367 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
1939 |
23.6% |
0.236060385 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
946 |
11.5% |
0.115169223 |
| 5 |
Somewhat poor |
1633 |
19.9% |
0.198806915 |
| 6 |
Poor |
847 |
10.3% |
0.103116630 |
| 7 |
Very poor |
286 |
3.5% |
0.034818602 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
0.9% |
0.008765522 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcldi
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: immigrants in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in Norway?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
92 |
1.1% |
0.011200390 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
193 |
2.3% |
0.023496469 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
763 |
9.3% |
0.092890187 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2760 |
33.6% |
0.336011687 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2278 |
27.7% |
0.277331385 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1749 |
21.3% |
0.212929145 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
304 |
3.7% |
0.037009983 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
75 |
0.9% |
0.009130752 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_cpres
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich
parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that
everyone receives public services of the same quality.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disgree with the following statement:
Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the
country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives
public services of the same quality.
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1025 |
12.5% |
0.124786949 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2668 |
32.5% |
0.324811298 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2681 |
32.6% |
0.326393962 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
910 |
11.1% |
0.110786462 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
555 |
6.8% |
0.067567568 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
244 |
3.0% |
0.029705381 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
88 |
1.1% |
0.010713416 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.5% |
0.005234965 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcgro
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of
industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
assertion:
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of
industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
333 |
4.1% |
0.040540541 |
| 2 |
Agree |
846 |
10.3% |
0.102994887 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1818 |
22.1% |
0.221329438 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
814 |
9.9% |
0.099099099 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1842 |
22.4% |
0.224251278 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1581 |
19.2% |
0.192476260 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
941 |
11.5% |
0.114560506 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.5% |
0.004747991 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcoil
|
Variable label:
|
Development of the oil and gas industry in Norway. In 10 to 15 years,
the industry should be…
|
|
Literal question:
|
There is frequent debate about how the oil and gas industry in Norway
should be developed over the next 10 to 15 years. Which of the following
options is closest to your view?
In 10 to 15 years, the industry should be …
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
As large as possible |
457 |
5.6% |
0.055636718 |
| 2 |
Larger than today |
469 |
5.7% |
0.057097638 |
| 3 |
Just as large as today |
2783 |
33.9% |
0.338811785 |
| 4 |
Smaller than today |
2999 |
36.5% |
0.365108352 |
| 5 |
As small as possible |
1458 |
17.8% |
0.177501826 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.6% |
0.005843682 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pceum
|
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
973 |
11.8% |
0.118456294 |
| 2 |
Positive |
1398 |
17.0% |
0.170197224 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
1216 |
14.8% |
0.148039932 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
865 |
10.5% |
0.105308011 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
1184 |
14.4% |
0.144144144 |
| 6 |
Negative |
1296 |
15.8% |
0.157779401 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
1242 |
15.1% |
0.151205259 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
0.5% |
0.004869735 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pceea
|
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
1113 |
13.6% |
0.13550037 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
2114 |
25.7% |
0.25736547 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
2407 |
29.3% |
0.29303628 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
789 |
9.6% |
0.09605551 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
978 |
11.9% |
0.11906501 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
449 |
5.5% |
0.05466277 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
273 |
3.3% |
0.03323594 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
91 |
1.1% |
0.01107865 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcnat
|
Variable label:
|
Norways membership status in NATO
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to your point of view:
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norway should continue to be a member of NATO. |
7886 |
96.0% |
0.960068176 |
| 2 |
Norway should opt out of NATO. |
264 |
3.2% |
0.032140248 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
0.8% |
0.007791575 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_innae
|
Variable label:
|
How do you rate the increased military presence of NATO in Eastern
Europe?
|
|
Literal question:
|
NATO has recently increased its military forces and military equipment
in Eastern Europe considerably. How do you rate the increased military
presence in Eastern Europe?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
2420 |
29.5% |
0.294618943 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
2863 |
34.9% |
0.348551254 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
1027 |
12.5% |
0.125030436 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
896 |
10.9% |
0.109082055 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
492 |
6.0% |
0.059897736 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
459 |
5.6% |
0.055880205 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
0.7% |
0.006939372 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pceco
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of: Your own financial situation today
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you assess your own financial situation today?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
887 |
10.8% |
0.107986365 |
| 2 |
Good |
3690 |
44.9% |
0.449233017 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
1558 |
19.0% |
0.189676163 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
1157 |
14.1% |
0.140857073 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
616 |
7.5% |
0.074993913 |
| 6 |
Bad |
222 |
2.7% |
0.027027027 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
56 |
0.7% |
0.006817628 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.3% |
0.003408814 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcinc
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The Government should work to reduce income inequality
in society
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
suggestion:
The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society to
greater extent.
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1947 |
23.7% |
0.237034332 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2275 |
27.7% |
0.276966155 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1948 |
23.7% |
0.237156075 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
843 |
10.3% |
0.102629657 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
648 |
7.9% |
0.078889701 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
381 |
4.6% |
0.046384222 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
124 |
1.5% |
0.015096177 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.6% |
0.005843682 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcecy
|
Variable label:
|
Assessment of: Your own financial situation in a year
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you assess your own financial situation in a year?
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Much worse than today |
54 |
0.7% |
0.006574142 |
| 2 |
Worse than today |
1093 |
13.3% |
0.133065498 |
| 3 |
Neither worse nor better than today |
5686 |
69.2% |
0.692232773 |
| 4 |
Better than today |
1284 |
15.6% |
0.156318481 |
| 5 |
Much better than today |
71 |
0.9% |
0.008643779 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.3% |
0.003165327 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcwet
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The wealth tax should be abolished
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
proposition:
The wealth tax should be abolished.
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1190 |
14.5% |
0.144874604 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1191 |
14.5% |
0.144996348 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1383 |
16.8% |
0.168371074 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1128 |
13.7% |
0.137326516 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1157 |
14.1% |
0.140857073 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1401 |
17.1% |
0.170562454 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
707 |
8.6% |
0.086072559 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
0.7% |
0.006939372 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcrew
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Large gaps in income are necessary in order to reward
talent and effort
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements:
Large differences in people’s incomes are necessary in order to reward
talent and effort.
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
146 |
1.8% |
0.017774531 |
| 2 |
Agree |
724 |
8.8% |
0.088142196 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2113 |
25.7% |
0.257243730 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
748 |
9.1% |
0.091064037 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1666 |
20.3% |
0.202824446 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1728 |
21.0% |
0.210372535 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1071 |
13.0% |
0.130387144 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.2% |
0.002191381 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pccen
|
Variable label:
|
In general, which of the statements to do agree the most with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, which of the following statements do you agree with
the most:
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
There should be larger and fewer public institutions, such as municipalities,
hospitals, educational institutions and police districts. |
3030 |
36.9% |
0.36888240 |
| 2 |
There should be smaller and more public institutions, such as municipalities,
hospitals, educational institutions and police districts. |
4994 |
60.8% |
0.60798636 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
190 |
2.3% |
0.02313124 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcldpk
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Christian Democratic party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
984 |
12.0% |
0.119795471 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1498 |
18.2% |
0.182371561 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1874 |
22.8% |
0.228147066 |
| 4 |
Neither like nor dislike |
1973 |
24.0% |
0.240199659 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1388 |
16.9% |
0.168979791 |
| 6 |
Really like |
335 |
4.1% |
0.040784027 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
90 |
1.1% |
0.010956903 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
0.9% |
0.008765522 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcldph
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
457 |
5.6% |
0.055636718 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1175 |
14.3% |
0.143048454 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1519 |
18.5% |
0.184928171 |
| 4 |
Neither like nor dislike |
904 |
11.0% |
0.110056002 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1905 |
23.2% |
0.231921110 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1629 |
19.8% |
0.198319942 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
561 |
6.8% |
0.068298028 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
64 |
0.8% |
0.007791575 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcldpf
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
2186 |
26.6% |
0.266130996 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1744 |
21.2% |
0.212320429 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1154 |
14.0% |
0.140491843 |
| 4 |
Neither like nor dislike |
732 |
8.9% |
0.089116143 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1331 |
16.2% |
0.162040419 |
| 6 |
Really like |
727 |
8.9% |
0.088507426 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
272 |
3.3% |
0.033114195 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
68 |
0.8% |
0.008278549 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcldpv
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
468 |
5.7% |
0.056975895 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
871 |
10.6% |
0.106038471 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1577 |
19.2% |
0.191989287 |
| 4 |
Neither like nor dislike |
2072 |
25.2% |
0.252252252 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2216 |
27.0% |
0.269783297 |
| 6 |
Really like |
775 |
9.4% |
0.094351108 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
162 |
2.0% |
0.019722425 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
73 |
0.9% |
0.008887266 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcldpsv
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
902 |
11.0% |
0.109812515 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1194 |
14.5% |
0.145361578 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1268 |
15.4% |
0.154370587 |
| 4 |
Neither like nor dislike |
1156 |
14.1% |
0.140735330 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1786 |
21.7% |
0.217433650 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1332 |
16.2% |
0.162162162 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
495 |
6.0% |
0.060262966 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
81 |
1.0% |
0.009861213 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcldpsp
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
997 |
12.1% |
0.121378135 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1641 |
20.0% |
0.199780862 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2019 |
24.6% |
0.245799854 |
| 4 |
Neither like nor dislike |
1604 |
19.5% |
0.195276357 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1480 |
18.0% |
0.180180180 |
| 6 |
Really like |
343 |
4.2% |
0.041757974 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
62 |
0.8% |
0.007548089 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
68 |
0.8% |
0.008278549 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcldpm
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1511 |
18.4% |
0.183954224 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1277 |
15.5% |
0.155466277 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1343 |
16.4% |
0.163501339 |
| 4 |
Neither like nor dislike |
1160 |
14.1% |
0.141222303 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1810 |
22.0% |
0.220355491 |
| 6 |
Really like |
830 |
10.1% |
0.101046993 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
224 |
2.7% |
0.027270514 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
0.7% |
0.007182859 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcldpa
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
580 |
7.1% |
0.070611152 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1011 |
12.3% |
0.123082542 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1512 |
18.4% |
0.184075968 |
| 4 |
Neither like nor dislike |
1063 |
12.9% |
0.129413197 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
2416 |
29.4% |
0.294131970 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1353 |
16.5% |
0.164718773 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
221 |
2.7% |
0.026905284 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
0.7% |
0.007061115 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_pcldpr
|
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various
Norwegian political parties.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Post-question:
|
Click on your desired answer
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1608 |
19.6% |
0.195763331 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
1314 |
16.0% |
0.159970782 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1244 |
15.1% |
0.151448746 |
| 4 |
Neither like nor dislike |
1109 |
13.5% |
0.135013392 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1748 |
21.3% |
0.212807402 |
| 6 |
Really like |
831 |
10.1% |
0.101168736 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
291 |
3.5% |
0.035427319 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
69 |
0.8% |
0.008400292 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_cewip_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More onshore wind power should be developed in Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements
|
|
Literal question:
|
More onshore wind power should be developed in Norway.
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
592 |
7.2% |
0.072072072 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1167 |
14.2% |
0.142074507 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1793 |
21.8% |
0.218285853 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
889 |
10.8% |
0.108229851 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1076 |
13.1% |
0.130995861 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1147 |
14.0% |
0.139639640 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1484 |
18.1% |
0.180667154 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
66 |
0.8% |
0.008035062 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r29_cewip_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More offshore wind power should be developed in Norway.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements
|
|
Literal question:
|
More offshore wind power should be developed in Norway.
|
|
Field period:
|
15.01.2024 - 05.02.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8214] [Invalid:3301]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1105 |
13.5% |
0.134526418 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2172 |
26.4% |
0.264426589 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1992 |
24.3% |
0.242512783 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
862 |
10.5% |
0.104942781 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
561 |
6.8% |
0.068298028 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
550 |
6.7% |
0.066958851 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
900 |
11.0% |
0.109569028 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
72 |
0.9% |
0.008765522 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3301 |
|
NA |
r30_pcpri
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The authorities should introduce more measures to
protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may
be at the expense of privacy.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
proposition:
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from
potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of
privacy.
|
|
Field period:
|
03.06.2024 - 04.07.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r30_group = 6 )]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9684] [Invalid:1831]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
165 |
11.4% |
0.11379310 |
| 2 |
Agree |
335 |
23.1% |
0.23103448 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
368 |
25.4% |
0.25379310 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
206 |
14.2% |
0.14206897 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
192 |
13.2% |
0.13241379 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
122 |
8.4% |
0.08413793 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
60 |
4.1% |
0.04137931 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.00137931 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1831 |
|
NA |
r30_pcimm
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Field period:
|
03.06.2024 - 04.07.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r30_group = 6 )]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9684] [Invalid:1831]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A very great advantage |
66 |
4.6% |
0.045517241 |
| 2 |
A great advantage |
261 |
18.0% |
0.180000000 |
| 3 |
A slight advantage |
468 |
32.3% |
0.322758621 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
253 |
17.4% |
0.174482759 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
275 |
19.0% |
0.189655172 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
77 |
5.3% |
0.053103448 |
| 7 |
A very great disadvantage |
46 |
3.2% |
0.031724138 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002758621 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1831 |
|
NA |
r30_pcrur
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for
non-urban/rural Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?:
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural
Norway.
|
|
Field period:
|
03.06.2024 - 04.07.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r30_group = 6 )]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9684] [Invalid:1831]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
256 |
17.7% |
0.176551724 |
| 2 |
Agree |
313 |
21.6% |
0.215862069 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
301 |
20.8% |
0.207586207 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
340 |
23.4% |
0.234482759 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
81 |
5.6% |
0.055862069 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
116 |
8.0% |
0.080000000 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
2.1% |
0.021379310 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.8% |
0.008275862 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1831 |
|
NA |
r30_pcscc
|
Variable label:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Field period:
|
03.06.2024 - 04.07.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r30_group = 6 )]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9684] [Invalid:1831]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I don’t believe that the climate is changing. |
6 |
0.4% |
0.0041379310 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
49 |
3.4% |
0.0337931034 |
| 3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent
due to human action |
247 |
17.0% |
0.1703448276 |
| 4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to
human action. |
1147 |
79.1% |
0.7910344828 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006896552 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1831 |
|
NA |
r30_pcwcc
|
Variable label:
|
How worried are you about climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How worried are you about climate change?
|
|
Field period:
|
03.06.2024 - 04.07.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r30_group = 6 )]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9684] [Invalid:1831]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all worried |
63 |
4.3% |
0.043448276 |
| 2 |
Not very worried |
195 |
13.4% |
0.134482759 |
| 3 |
Somewhat worried |
394 |
27.2% |
0.271724138 |
| 4 |
Worried |
513 |
35.4% |
0.353793103 |
| 5 |
Very worried |
282 |
19.4% |
0.194482759 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002068966 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1831 |
|
NA |
r30_pcgro
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of
industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
assertion:
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of
industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Field period:
|
03.06.2024 - 04.07.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r30_group = 6 )]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9684] [Invalid:1831]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
61 |
4.2% |
0.042068966 |
| 2 |
Agree |
157 |
10.8% |
0.108275862 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
287 |
19.8% |
0.197931034 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
154 |
10.6% |
0.106206897 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
355 |
24.5% |
0.244827586 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
289 |
19.9% |
0.199310345 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
142 |
9.8% |
0.097931034 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.003448276 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1831 |
|
NA |
r30_pcinc
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The Government should work to reduce income inequality
in society
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
suggestion:
The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society to
greater extent.
|
|
Field period:
|
03.06.2024 - 04.07.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r30_group = 6 )]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9684] [Invalid:1831]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
370 |
25.5% |
0.255172414 |
| 2 |
Agree |
368 |
25.4% |
0.253793103 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
330 |
22.8% |
0.227586207 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
132 |
9.1% |
0.091034483 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
108 |
7.4% |
0.074482759 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
106 |
7.3% |
0.073103448 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
2.1% |
0.021379310 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.003448276 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1831 |
|
NA |
r30_pcsex
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted
sexual attention?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following assertion:
It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention.
|
|
Field period:
|
03.06.2024 - 04.07.2024
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r30_group = 6 )]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9684] [Invalid:1831]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
21 |
1.4% |
0.014482759 |
| 2 |
Agree |
48 |
3.3% |
0.033103448 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
121 |
8.3% |
0.083448276 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
100 |
6.9% |
0.068965517 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
140 |
9.7% |
0.096551724 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
354 |
24.4% |
0.244137931 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
661 |
45.6% |
0.455862069 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.003448276 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1831 |
|
NA |
