Codebook

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Round 4

v-102 - 2023-11-06

Produced by ideas2evidence

Citation

Primary investigators

Name	Affiliation
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten	Coordinator, University of Bergen
Sveinung Arnesen, Gisela Böhm, Dag Elgesem, Odd Gåsdal, Kristin Strømsnes, Endre Tvinnereim, and Jacob Aars	Scientific team, University of Bergen og Rokkansenteret

Producers

Name	Affiliation	Role
Øivind Skjervheim	ideas2evidence	Coordinator
Asle Høgestøl	ideas2evidence	Coordinator
Jostein Ryssevik	ideas2evidence	Quality assurance

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no

Scope

Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in two waves, wave 1 and wave 3. In wave 1 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3 5.623 members were recruited. Prior to wave 4 the Norwegian Citizen Panel had 10 463 members. The sampling procedure of wave and wave 1 is identical. 25 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.

Mode of Data Collection

The survey is based on a online questionnaire. Existing members receivs e-mail invitations asking for their participation in the current wave.

New panel members were recruited in multiple steps.

First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters contained the following information: a) a description of the project, b) the Citizen Panel’s policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the anonymity of the participants, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the participants’ rights to opt of the panel at any time in the future, e) contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a unique log-in id and the web address to the panel’s web site and g) the estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).

The invitation was emailed on the 09th of March 2015.

Three e-mail reminders were sent at the following dates: 12th of March, 16h of March, and 19th of March. The reminder was sent to those who a) had not entered the questionnaire, and b) had not completed the questionnaire. The fourth and last reminder was distributed as a text message on the 25th of March

Wave 4 was closed 08th of April.

Weighting

To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix). When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different weights have been calculated:

Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).

When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.

We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.

Change Log

Version	Release date / Date changed	Variable	Changes and notes
v-102	2023-11-06	NA	Revised release of round 4
NA	2023-11-02	r4Weight4	New variable: Added r4Weight4
NA	2023-11-02	r4Weight4	Variable documentation inserted
NA	2021-08-30	r4k204	Variable documentation inserted
v-101	2020-06-15	NA	Revised release of round 4
NA	2020-06-11	r4fri22	Variable documentation updated
NA	2020-06-10	r4_Answered_date	Corrected incoherent date format.
NA	2020-06-10	r4_Answered_date	Variable documentation updated
NA	2019-03-27	r4k40_recode	Added variable based on r4k40.
NA	2018-04-13	r4p5_1	Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
NA	2018-04-13	r4p5_2	Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
NA	2018-02-22	r4p3	Updated the value of 1 respondent.
NA	2018-02-12	r4p4_1	Corrected values of 42 respondents.
NA	2018-02-12	r4p4_2	Corrected values of 42 respondents.
NA	2018-02-12	r4_weight_2	Corrected values of 42 respondents.
NA	2017-06-14	r4p4_1	Updated value on 40 respondents.
NA	2017-06-14	r4p4_2	Updated value on 40 respondents.
NA	2015-12-07	r4km13a	Corrected value labels accordingly (1 = 7, 7 = 1)
NA	2015-12-07	r4km13b	Corrected value labels accordingly (1 = 7, 7 = 1)
NA	2015-12-07	r4km13c	Corrected value labels accordingly (1 = 7, 7 = 1)
NA	2015-12-07	r4km13d	Corrected value labels accordingly (1 = 7, 7 = 1)
NA	2015-12-07	r4pad17	Corrected value norwegian labels accordingly (1 = 5, 5 = 1)
NA	2015-12-07	r4_answered_date	New variable
NA	2015-12-07	r4p4_2	Updated value on 8 respondents
NA	2015-12-07	r4k25	Updated so that values and value labels are sequential.
NA	2015-12-07	r4dv45d	Updated norwegian variable documentation.
NA	2015-12-07	r4dv56c	Recoded ‘dont know’ from 99 to 3
NA	2015-12-07	r4oc24a	Corrected from 7-point answer scale to 5-point answer scale
NA	2015-12-07	r4oc24b	Corrected from 7-point answer scale to 5-point answer scale
NA	2015-12-07	r4pad12_1	Corrected value labels. ‘Strongly agree/disagree’ to ‘Totally agree/disagree’
NA	2015-12-07	r4pad12_2	Corrected value labels. ‘Strongly agree/disagree’ to ‘Totally agree/disagree’
NA	2015-12-07	r4pad14_1	Corrected value labels. ‘Somewhat dislike’ to ‘Significantly dislike’
NA	2015-12-07	r4pad14_2	Corrected value labels. ‘Somewhat dislike’ to ‘Significantly dislike’
NA	2015-12-07	r4pad14_3	Corrected value labels. ‘Somewhat dislike’ to ‘Significantly dislike’
NA	2015-12-07	r4dv48a	Updated variabledocumentation. ‘Schools’ to ‘School districts’
NA	2015-12-07	r4dv48b	Updated variabledocumentation. ‘Schools’ to ‘School districts’
NA	2015-12-07	r4dv48c	Updated variabledocumentation. ‘Schools’ to ‘School districts’
NA	2015-12-07	r4dv48d	Updated variabledocumentation. ‘Schools’ to ‘School districts’
NA	2015-12-07	r4oc9c	Corrected answer scale. Agree and disagree was swapped.
NA	2015-12-07	r4oc9d	Corrected answer scale. Agree and disagree was swapped.
NA	2015-12-07	r4oc10b	Corrected answer scale. Agree and disagree was swapped.
NA	2015-12-07	r4oc10c	Corrected answer scale. Agree and disagree was swapped.
NA	2015-12-07	r4oc10d	Corrected answer scale. ‘Government should see to it’ and ‘Government should not see to it’ was swapped
NA	2015-12-07	r4oc11a	Corrected answer scale. ‘Agree’ and ‘disagree’ was swapped.
NA	2015-12-07	r4km4g_1	Corrected english answer scale. ‘Highly negative’ on both end points. ‘Highly positive’ = 10
NA	2015-12-07	r4km4g_2	Corrected english answer scale. ‘Highly negative’ on both end points. ‘Highly positive’ = 10
NA	2015-07-06	r4km2	Flipped answer scale and adjusted value labels accordingly (1 = 7, 7 = 1)
NA	2015-06-04	r4dv48c	Modified english variable documentation
v-100	2015-04-24	NA	Initial release of round 4

Dataset contents

File name	Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 4 - v-102-O.sav
Distribution type	Public
# Cases	6297
# Variables	573

Variable Documentation

responseid

Variable label:	responseid
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4Recruited

Variable label:	Time of recruitment
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Wave 1	2687	42.7%	0.4267111
2	Wave 3	3610	57.3%	0.5732889

r4_u

Variable label:	[Respondents are randomized in four groups]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Cases	Percentage
1	1558	24.7%	0.2474194
2	1607	25.5%	0.2552009
3	1548	24.6%	0.2458313
4	1584	25.2%	0.2515484

r4_Answered_date

Variable label:	Date and time for survey response
Technical description:	Date and time for survey response
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k11

Variable label:	Satisfaction with democracy
Literal question:	All in all, how satisfied are you about the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	1036	16.5%	0.164522789
2	Satisfied	3864	61.4%	0.613625536
3	Somewhat satisfied	1092	17.3%	0.173415912
4	Slightly satisfied	238	3.8%	0.037795776
5	Not satisfied at all	40	0.6%	0.006352231
97		27	0.4%	0.004287756

r4k204

Variable label:	Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Literal question:	Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	295	4.7%	0.046847705
2	The Conservative Party of Norway	1349	21.4%	0.214228998
3	The Progress Party	410	6.5%	0.065110370
4	The Liberal Party	371	5.9%	0.058916945
5	The Socialist Left Party	304	4.8%	0.048276957
6	The Centre Party	245	3.9%	0.038907416
7	The Green Party	364	5.8%	0.057805304
8	The Labour Party	2345	37.2%	0.372399555
9	The Red Party	120	1.9%	0.019056694
10	Would not vote	199	3.2%	0.031602350
11	Not entitled to vote	146	2.3%	0.023185644
12	Other:	109	1.7%	0.017309830
97	No answer	40	0.6%	0.006352231

r4k204_12_other

Variable label:	Other: Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary election tomorrow? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description:	[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k43_1

Variable label:	Would vote for following party in municipal elections
Literal question:	Municipal and county elections will be held during the autumn. If you are going to vote, which parties or lists will you vote for?
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Red Party	142	2.3%	0.022550421
2	The Socialist Left Party	283	4.5%	0.044942036
3	The Labour Party	1886	30.0%	0.299507702
4	The Centre Party	262	4.2%	0.041607114
5	The Christian Democrats	263	4.2%	0.041765920
6	The Liberal Party	329	5.2%	0.052247102
7	The Conservative Party	1311	20.8%	0.208194378
8	The Progress Party	352	5.6%	0.055899635
9	The Green Party	299	4.7%	0.047482928
10	The Coastal Party	8	0.1%	0.001270446
11	Joint lists	23	0.4%	0.003652533
12	Other lists	80	1.3%	0.012704462
13	Haven't decided who to vote for	817	13.0%	0.129744323
14	Not entitled to vote	50	0.8%	0.007940289
15	Will not vote	140	2.2%	0.022232809
97	No answer	52	0.8%	0.008257901

r4k43_2

Variable label:	Would vote for following party in county elections
Literal question:	Municipal and county elections will be held during the autumn. If you are going to vote, which parties or lists will you vote for?
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Red Party	118	1.9%	0.0187390821
2	The Socialist Left Party	276	4.4%	0.0438303954
3	The Labour Party	1829	29.0%	0.2904557726
4	The Centre Party	213	3.4%	0.0338256313
5	The Christian Democrats	249	4.0%	0.0395426394
6	The Liberal Party	300	4.8%	0.0476417342
7	The Conservative Party	1199	19.0%	0.1904081309
8	The Progress Party	341	5.4%	0.0541527712
9	The Green Party	298	4.7%	0.0473241226
10	The Coastal Party	9	0.1%	0.0014292520
11	Joint lists	4	0.1%	0.0006352231
12	Other lists	42	0.7%	0.0066698428
13	Haven't decided who to vote for	853	13.5%	0.1354613308
14	Not entitled to vote	55	0.9%	0.0087343179
15	Will not vote	184	2.9%	0.0292202636
97	No answer	327	5.2%	0.0519294902

r4k202

Variable label:	How satisfied are you with the current government?
Literal question:	How satisfied are you with the current government?
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	162	2.6%	0.025726536
2	Satisfied	1567	24.9%	0.248848658
3	Somewhat satisfied	1984	31.5%	0.315070669
4	Slightly satisfied	1733	27.5%	0.275210418
5	Not satisfied at all	834	13.2%	0.132444021
97	No answer	17	0.3%	0.002699698

r4k6_1

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Christian Democrats
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Christian Democrats
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	436	6.9%	0.06923932
2	Really dislike	783	12.4%	0.12434493
3	Dislike somewhat	1572	25.0%	0.24964269
4	Neither dislike nor like	1533	24.3%	0.24344926
5	Like somewhat	1339	21.3%	0.21264094
6	Really like	438	7.0%	0.06955693
7	Intensely like	71	1.1%	0.01127521
97	No answer	125	2.0%	0.01985072

r4k6_2

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Conservative Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Conservative Party
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	274	4.4%	0.04351278
2	Really dislike	819	13.0%	0.13006193
3	Dislike somewhat	1290	20.5%	0.20485946
4	Neither dislike nor like	765	12.1%	0.12148642
5	Like somewhat	1517	24.1%	0.24090837
6	Really like	1224	19.4%	0.19437828
7	Intensely like	278	4.4%	0.04414801
97	No answer	130	2.1%	0.02064475

r4k6_3

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Progress Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Progress Party
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	1951	31.0%	0.30983008
2	Really dislike	1227	19.5%	0.19485469
3	Dislike somewhat	916	14.5%	0.14546609
4	Neither dislike nor like	571	9.1%	0.09067810
5	Like somewhat	932	14.8%	0.14800699
6	Really like	418	6.6%	0.06638082
7	Intensely like	151	2.4%	0.02397967
97	No answer	131	2.1%	0.02080356

r4k6_4

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Liberal Party
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	314	5.0%	0.04986502
2	Really dislike	602	9.6%	0.09560108
3	Dislike somewhat	1243	19.7%	0.19739559
4	Neither dislike nor like	1821	28.9%	0.28918533
5	Like somewhat	1516	24.1%	0.24074956
6	Really like	552	8.8%	0.08766079
7	Intensely like	82	1.3%	0.01302207
97	No answer	167	2.7%	0.02652057

r4k6_5

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Socialist Left Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Socialist Left Party
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	952	15.1%	0.15118310
2	Really dislike	959	15.2%	0.15229474
3	Dislike somewhat	1167	18.5%	0.18532635
4	Neither dislike nor like	1297	20.6%	0.20597110
5	Like somewhat	1117	17.7%	0.17738606
6	Really like	516	8.2%	0.08194378
7	Intensely like	131	2.1%	0.02080356
97	No answer	158	2.5%	0.02509131

r4k6_6

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Centre Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Centre Party
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	501	8.0%	0.07956170
2	Really dislike	801	12.7%	0.12720343
3	Dislike somewhat	1292	20.5%	0.20517707
4	Neither dislike nor like	2031	32.3%	0.32253454
5	Like somewhat	1115	17.7%	0.17706845
6	Really like	304	4.8%	0.04827696
7	Intensely like	71	1.1%	0.01127521
97	No answer	182	2.9%	0.02890265

r4k6_7

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Green Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Green Party
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	459	7.3%	0.07289185
2	Really dislike	526	8.4%	0.08353184
3	Dislike somewhat	767	12.2%	0.12180403
4	Neither dislike nor like	2098	33.3%	0.33317453
5	Like somewhat	1419	22.5%	0.22534540
6	Really like	669	10.6%	0.10624107
7	Intensely like	187	3.0%	0.02969668
97	No answer	172	2.7%	0.02731459

r4k6_8

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Labour Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Labour Party
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	239	3.8%	0.03795458
2	Really dislike	368	5.8%	0.05844053
3	Dislike somewhat	766	12.2%	0.12164523
4	Neither dislike nor like	837	13.3%	0.13292044
5	Like somewhat	1666	26.5%	0.26457043
6	Really like	1710	27.2%	0.27155788
7	Intensely like	571	9.1%	0.09067810
97	No answer	140	2.2%	0.02223281

r4k6_9

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Red Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Red Party
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	1444	22.9%	0.22931555
2	Really dislike	1052	16.7%	0.16706368
3	Dislike somewhat	889	14.1%	0.14117834
4	Neither dislike nor like	1639	26.0%	0.26028267
5	Like somewhat	745	11.8%	0.11831031
6	Really like	273	4.3%	0.04335398
7	Intensely like	83	1.3%	0.01318088
97	No answer	172	2.7%	0.02731459

r4k8_1

Variable label:	Placement on political scale
Literal question:	In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are politically on the far left, and 10 represents those who are politically on the far right. Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	43	1.6%	0.01600298
2	1	65	2.4%	0.02419055
3	2	213	7.9%	0.07927056
4	3	418	15.6%	0.15556383
5	4	391	14.6%	0.14551544
6	5	362	13.5%	0.13472274
7	6	331	12.3%	0.12318571
8	7	360	13.4%	0.13397841
9	8	250	9.3%	0.09304057
10	9	68	2.5%	0.02530703
11	10 Right	47	1.7%	0.01749163
97	No answer	94	3.5%	0.03498325
98	Not asked	3610		NA
99	No answer	45	1.7%	0.01674730

r4k9_1

Variable label:	Most important political issues personally [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally?
Technical description:	Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue. [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k9_2

Variable label:	Most important political issues personally [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally?
Technical description:	Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue. [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k9_3

Variable label:	Most important political issues personally [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally?
Technical description:	Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue. [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k10

Variable label:	How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
Literal question:	How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
Technical description:	Do you think it is:
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	1681	26.7%	0.266952517
2	Good	3368	53.5%	0.534857869
3	Somewhat good	818	13.0%	0.129903128
4	Neither good nor bad	214	3.4%	0.033984437
5	Somewhat bad	148	2.4%	0.023503256
6	Bad	39	0.6%	0.006193425
7	Very bad	12	0.2%	0.001905669
97	No answer	17	0.3%	0.002699698

r4dv30_1

Variable label:	Statement: The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to cutbacks in the welfare state.
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to cutbacks in the welfare state.
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	184	2.9%	0.029220264
2	Agree	423	6.7%	0.067174845
3	Agree somewhat	868	13.8%	0.137843418
4	Neither agree nor disagree	638	10.1%	0.101318088
5	Disagree somewhat	1008	16.0%	0.160076227
6	Disagree	1739	27.6%	0.276163252
7	Strongly disagree	1379	21.9%	0.218993171
97	No answer	58	0.9%	0.009210735

r4dv30_2

Variable label:	Statement: Commercial private schools should be allowed.
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Commercial private schools should be allowed.
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	373	5.9%	0.059234556
2	Agree	1040	16.5%	0.165158012
3	Agree somewhat	1250	19.9%	0.198507226
4	Neither agree nor disagree	853	13.5%	0.135461331
5	Disagree somewhat	905	14.4%	0.143719231
6	Disagree	997	15.8%	0.158329363
7	Strongly disagree	822	13.1%	0.130538352
97	No answer	57	0.9%	0.009051929

r4dv30_3

Variable label:	Statement: Many public activities could have been carried out both with better results and at a lower cost, if they were run by the private sector.
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Many public activities could have been carried out both with better results and at a lower cost, if they were run by the private sector.
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	447	7.1%	0.070986184
2	Agree	972	15.4%	0.154359219
3	Agree somewhat	1501	23.8%	0.238367477
4	Neither agree nor disagree	733	11.6%	0.116404637
5	Disagree somewhat	895	14.2%	0.142131174
6	Disagree	1043	16.6%	0.165634429
7	Strongly disagree	656	10.4%	0.104176592
97	No answer	50	0.8%	0.007940289

r4dv31_1

Variable label:	Statement: The government should contribute towards reducing income differences in society.
Pre-question text:	Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	The government should contribute towards reducing income differences in society.
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	372	13.8%	0.13844436
2	Agree	696	25.9%	0.25902493
3	Agree somewhat	776	28.9%	0.28879792
4	Neither agree nor disagree	300	11.2%	0.11164868
5	Disagree somewhat	252	9.4%	0.09378489
6	Disagree	193	7.2%	0.07182732
7	Strongly disagree	64	2.4%	0.02381838
97	No answer	34	1.3%	0.01265352
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4dv31_2

Variable label:	Statement: It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different religions and beliefs.
Pre-question text:	Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different religions and beliefs.
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	251	9.3%	0.09341273
2	Agree	586	21.8%	0.21808709
3	Agree somewhat	591	22.0%	0.21994790
4	Neither agree nor disagree	402	15.0%	0.14960923
5	Disagree somewhat	369	13.7%	0.13732787
6	Disagree	290	10.8%	0.10792706
7	Strongly disagree	158	5.9%	0.05880164
97	No answer	40	1.5%	0.01488649
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4dv31_3

Variable label:	Statement: Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has committed to, should be carried out abroad.
Pre-question text:	Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has committed to, should be carried out abroad.
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	79	2.9%	0.02940082
2	Agree	183	6.8%	0.06810569
3	Agree somewhat	359	13.4%	0.13360625
4	Neither agree nor disagree	590	22.0%	0.21957574
5	Disagree somewhat	518	19.3%	0.19278005
6	Disagree	642	23.9%	0.23892817
7	Strongly disagree	271	10.1%	0.10085597
97	No answer	45	1.7%	0.01674730
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4dvh_1

Variable label:	Statement: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and Vesterålen areas.
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and Vesterålen areas.
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	1330	21.1%	0.21121169
2	Agree	1136	18.0%	0.18040337
3	Agree somewhat	782	12.4%	0.12418612
4	Neither agree nor disagree	1060	16.8%	0.16833413
5	Disagree somewhat	790	12.5%	0.12545657
6	Disagree	752	11.9%	0.11942195
7	Strongly disagree	381	6.1%	0.06050500
97	No answer	66	1.0%	0.01048118

r4dvh_2

Variable label:	Statement: Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	548	8.7%	0.08702557
2	Agree	1128	17.9%	0.17913292
3	Agree somewhat	1176	18.7%	0.18675560
4	Neither agree nor disagree	662	10.5%	0.10512943
5	Disagree somewhat	1128	17.9%	0.17913292
6	Disagree	955	15.2%	0.15165952
7	Strongly disagree	633	10.1%	0.10052406
97	No answer	67	1.1%	0.01063999

r4dvh_3

Variable label:	Statement: Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	2639	41.9%	0.41908845
2	Agree	1711	27.2%	0.27171669
3	Agree somewhat	550	8.7%	0.08734318
4	Neither agree nor disagree	513	8.1%	0.08146737
5	Disagree somewhat	319	5.1%	0.05065904
6	Disagree	284	4.5%	0.04510084
7	Strongly disagree	215	3.4%	0.03414324
97	No answer	66	1.0%	0.01048118

r4dt16_1

Variable label:	Place parties on political scale: The Christian Democrats
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Christian Democrats
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	16	0.6%	0.005954596
2	1	34	1.3%	0.012653517
3	2	52	1.9%	0.019352438
4	3	116	4.3%	0.043170822
5	4	274	10.2%	0.101972460
6	5	585	21.8%	0.217714924
7	6	696	25.9%	0.259024935
8	7	386	14.4%	0.143654633
9	8	158	5.9%	0.058801638
10	9	50	1.9%	0.018608113
11	10 Right	38	1.4%	0.014142166
97	No answer	222	8.3%	0.082620022
98	Not asked	3610		NA
99	No answer	60	2.2%	0.022329736

r4dt16_2

Variable label:	Place parties on political scale: The Conservative Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Conservative Party
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	4	0.1%	0.001488649
2	1	6	0.2%	0.002232974
3	2	8	0.3%	0.002977298
4	3	13	0.5%	0.004838109
5	4	9	0.3%	0.003349460
6	5	37	1.4%	0.013770004
7	6	152	5.7%	0.056568664
8	7	468	17.4%	0.174171939
9	8	778	29.0%	0.289542240
10	9	608	22.6%	0.226274656
11	10 Right	369	13.7%	0.137327875
97	No answer	203	7.6%	0.075548939
98	Not asked	3610		NA
99	No answer	32	1.2%	0.011909192

r4dt16_3

Variable label:	Place parties on political scale: The Progress Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Progress Party
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	9	0.3%	0.003349460
2	1	8	0.3%	0.002977298
3	2	4	0.1%	0.001488649
4	3	23	0.9%	0.008559732
5	4	34	1.3%	0.012653517
6	5	31	1.2%	0.011537030
7	6	43	1.6%	0.016002977
8	7	117	4.4%	0.043542985
9	8	348	13.0%	0.129512467
10	9	608	22.6%	0.226274656
11	10 Right	1223	45.5%	0.455154447
97	No answer	203	7.6%	0.075548939
98	Not asked	3610		NA
99	No answer	36	1.3%	0.013397841

r4dt16_4

Variable label:	Place parties on political scale: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Liberal Party
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	173	6.4%	0.064384071
2	1	108	4.0%	0.040193524
3	2	188	7.0%	0.069966505
4	3	223	8.3%	0.082992185
5	4	309	11.5%	0.114998139
6	5	475	17.7%	0.176777075
7	6	515	19.2%	0.191663565
8	7	272	10.1%	0.101228135
9	8	95	3.5%	0.035355415
10	9	24	0.9%	0.008931894
11	10 Right	17	0.6%	0.006326758
97	No answer	232	8.6%	0.086341645
98	Not asked	3610		NA
99	No answer	56	2.1%	0.020841087

r4dt16_5

Variable label:	Place parties on political scale: The Socialist Left Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Socialist Left Party
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	385	14.3%	0.143282471
2	1	678	25.2%	0.252326014
3	2	775	28.8%	0.288425754
4	3	398	14.8%	0.148120581
5	4	86	3.2%	0.032005955
6	5	37	1.4%	0.013770004
7	6	14	0.5%	0.005210272
8	7	9	0.3%	0.003349460
9	8	6	0.2%	0.002232974
10	9	3	0.1%	0.001116487
11	10 Right	6	0.2%	0.002232974
97	No answer	230	8.6%	0.085597320
98	Not asked	3610		NA
99	No answer	60	2.2%	0.022329736

r4dt16_6

Variable label:	Place parties on political scale: The Centre Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Centre Party
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	37	1.4%	0.013770004
2	1	72	2.7%	0.026795683
3	2	142	5.3%	0.052847041
4	3	315	11.7%	0.117231113
5	4	686	25.5%	0.255303312
6	5	688	25.6%	0.256047637
7	6	302	11.2%	0.112393003
8	7	99	3.7%	0.036844064
9	8	29	1.1%	0.010792706
10	9	11	0.4%	0.004093785
11	10 Right	10	0.4%	0.003721623
97	No answer	231	8.6%	0.085969483
98	Not asked	3610		NA
99	No answer	65	2.4%	0.024190547

r4dt16_7

Variable label:	Place parties on political scale: The Green Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Green Party
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	184	6.8%	0.068477856
2	1	261	9.7%	0.097134351
3	2	398	14.8%	0.148120581
4	3	447	16.6%	0.166356531
5	4	444	16.5%	0.165240045
6	5	388	14.4%	0.144398958
7	6	91	3.4%	0.033866766
8	7	35	1.3%	0.013025679
9	8	14	0.5%	0.005210272
10	9	6	0.2%	0.002232974
11	10 Right	9	0.3%	0.003349460
97	No answer	304	11.3%	0.113137328
98	Not asked	3610		NA
99	No answer	106	3.9%	0.039449200

r4dt16_8

Variable label:	Place parties on political scale: The Labour Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Labour Party
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	54	2.0%	0.020096762
2	1	111	4.1%	0.041310011
3	2	261	9.7%	0.097134351
4	3	631	23.5%	0.234834388
5	4	671	25.0%	0.249720878
6	5	446	16.6%	0.165984369
7	6	169	6.3%	0.062895422
8	7	51	1.9%	0.018980275
9	8	22	0.8%	0.008187570
10	9	9	0.3%	0.003349460
11	10 Right	14	0.5%	0.005210272
97	No answer	207	7.7%	0.077037588
98	Not asked	3610		NA
99	No answer	41	1.5%	0.015258653

r4dt16_9

Variable label:	Place parties on political scale: The Red Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Red Party
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	1275	47.5%	0.4745068850
2	1	637	23.7%	0.2370673614
3	2	159	5.9%	0.0591737998
4	3	51	1.9%	0.0189802754
5	4	33	1.2%	0.0122813547
6	5	33	1.2%	0.0122813547
7	6	12	0.4%	0.0044659472
8	7	5	0.2%	0.0018608113
9	8	11	0.4%	0.0040937849
10	9	2	0.1%	0.0007443245
11	10 Right	23	0.9%	0.0085597320
97	No answer	316	11.8%	0.1176032750
98	Not asked	3610		NA
99	No answer	130	4.8%	0.0483810942

r4dv29_1

Variable label:	Statement: Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
Pre-question text:	Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 or DV29 is asked in wave 1 or DV202 is asked in wave 2.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	429	16.8%	0.168037603
2	Agree	499	19.5%	0.195456326
3	Agree somewhat	436	17.1%	0.170779475
4	Neither agree nor disagree	347	13.6%	0.135918527
5	Disagree somewhat	263	10.3%	0.103016060
6	Disagree	343	13.4%	0.134351743
7	Strongly disagree	215	8.4%	0.084214649
97	No answer	21	0.8%	0.008225617
98	Not asked	3744		NA

r4dv29_2

Variable label:	Statement: Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims are allowed to live here.
Pre-question text:	Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims are allowed to live here.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 or DV29 is asked in wave 1 or DV202 is asked in wave 2.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	246	9.6%	0.096357227
2	Agree	328	12.8%	0.128476302
3	Agree somewhat	516	20.2%	0.202115159
4	Neither agree nor disagree	340	13.3%	0.133176655
5	Disagree somewhat	339	13.3%	0.132784959
6	Disagree	501	19.6%	0.196239718
7	Strongly disagree	267	10.5%	0.104582844
97	No answer	16	0.6%	0.006267137
98	Not asked	3744		NA

r4dv29_3

Variable label:	Statement: Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world than to people in this country.
Pre-question text:	Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world than to people in this country.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 or DV29 is asked in wave 1 or DV202 is asked in wave 2.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	184	7.2%	0.072072072
2	Agree	392	15.4%	0.153544849
3	Agree somewhat	474	18.6%	0.185663925
4	Neither agree nor disagree	763	29.9%	0.298864081
5	Disagree somewhat	294	11.5%	0.115158637
6	Disagree	339	13.3%	0.132784959
7	Strongly disagree	89	3.5%	0.034860948
97	No answer	18	0.7%	0.007050529
98	Not asked	3744		NA

r4dv29_4

Variable label:	Statement: It is better for a country if most people share the same traditions and customs.
Pre-question text:	Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	It is better for a country if most people share the same traditions and customs.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 or DV29 is asked in wave 1 or DV202 is asked in wave 2.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	134	5.2%	0.052487270
2	Agree	293	11.5%	0.114766941
3	Agree somewhat	514	20.1%	0.201331767
4	Neither agree nor disagree	378	14.8%	0.148061105
5	Disagree somewhat	436	17.1%	0.170779475
6	Disagree	574	22.5%	0.224833529
7	Strongly disagree	205	8.0%	0.080297689
97	No answer	19	0.7%	0.007442225
98	Not asked	3744		NA

r4ran2

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1558] [Invalid:4739] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	404	25.9%	0.2593068
2	2	410	26.3%	0.2631579
3	3	373	23.9%	0.2394095
4	4	371	23.8%	0.2381258
Sysmiss		4739		NA

r4fri1a

Variable label:	Voluntary work: carried out any voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations
Pre-question text:	We will now turn to some questions about voluntary work.
Literal question:	During the last 12 months have you carried out any voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and ran2=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	177	43.8%	0.438118812
2	No	225	55.7%	0.556930693
97	No answer	2	0.5%	0.004950495
98	Not asked	5893		NA

r4fri1b

Variable label:	Voluntary work: made any voluntary contributions to voluntary organisations
Pre-question text:	We will now turn to some questions about voluntary work.
Literal question:	During the last 12 months have you made any voluntary contributions to voluntary organisations?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and ran2=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	188	45.9%	0.458536585
2	No	221	53.9%	0.539024390
97	No answer	1	0.2%	0.002439024
98	Not asked	5887		NA

r4fri1c

Variable label:	Voluntary work: carried out any voluntary work for voluntary organisations
Pre-question text:	We will now turn to some questions about voluntary work.
Literal question:	During the last 12 months have you carried out any voluntary work for voluntary organisations?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and ran2=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	175	46.9%	0.4691689
2	No	198	53.1%	0.5308311
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	5924		NA

r4fri1d

Variable label:	Voluntary work: undertaken any voluntary contracts for voluntary organisations
Pre-question text:	We will now turn to some questions about voluntary work.
Literal question:	During the last 12 months have you undertaken any voluntary contracts for voluntary organisations?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and ran2=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	178	48.0%	0.479784367
2	No	191	51.5%	0.514824798
97	No answer	2	0.5%	0.005390836
98	Not asked	5926		NA

r4fri2

Variable label:	Voluntary work: time spent on voluntary work during an ordinary week
Literal question:	If you think about the last year as a whole, roughly how much time did you spend on voluntary work during an ordinary week?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	I do not undertake voluntary work	609	39.1%	0.39088575
2	Less than half an hour	309	19.8%	0.19833119
3	Between half an hour and one hour	184	11.8%	0.11810013
4	1 to 2 hours	202	13.0%	0.12965340
5	2 to 5 hours	127	8.2%	0.08151476
6	More than 5 hours	111	7.1%	0.07124519
97	No answer	16	1.0%	0.01026958
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri3

Variable label:	Voluntary work: time spent for an average Norwegian
Literal question:	Roughly speaking how much time do you think an average Norwegian spends on voluntary work during an ordinary week?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
2	Less than half an hour	652	41.8%	0.41848524
3	Between half an hour and one hour	467	30.0%	0.29974326
4	1 to 2 hours	295	18.9%	0.18934531
5	2 to 5 hours	78	5.0%	0.05006418
6	More than 5 hours	22	1.4%	0.01412067
97	No answer	44	2.8%	0.02824134
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri4_1

Variable label:	Voluntary work: I am enthusiastic about my voluntary work
Pre-question text:	If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question:	I am enthusiastic about my voluntary work
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	154	9.9%	0.09884467
2	Agree	432	27.7%	0.27727856
3	Agree somewhat	187	12.0%	0.12002567
4	Neither agree nor disagree	497	31.9%	0.31899872
5	Disagree somewhat	40	2.6%	0.02567394
6	Disagree	51	3.3%	0.03273427
7	Strongly disagree	39	2.5%	0.02503209
97	No answer	158	10.1%	0.10141207
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri4_2

Variable label:	Voluntary work: I always want to engage in voluntary work
Pre-question text:	If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question:	I always want to engage in voluntary work
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	83	5.3%	0.05327343
2	Agree	273	17.5%	0.17522465
3	Agree somewhat	340	21.8%	0.21822850
4	Neither agree nor disagree	386	24.8%	0.24775353
5	Disagree somewhat	148	9.5%	0.09499358
6	Disagree	120	7.7%	0.07702182
7	Strongly disagree	43	2.8%	0.02759949
97	No answer	165	10.6%	0.10590501
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri4_3

Variable label:	Voluntary work: Time flies when I am doing voluntary work
Pre-question text:	If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question:	Time flies when I am doing voluntary work
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	81	5.2%	0.05198973
2	Agree	319	20.5%	0.20474968
3	Agree somewhat	259	16.6%	0.16623877
4	Neither agree nor disagree	566	36.3%	0.36328626
5	Disagree somewhat	70	4.5%	0.04492940
6	Disagree	41	2.6%	0.02631579
7	Strongly disagree	49	3.1%	0.03145058
97	No answer	173	11.1%	0.11103979
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri4_4

Variable label:	Voluntary work: I feel forced to participate more than I want to
Pre-question text:	If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question:	I feel forced to participate more than I want to
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	23	1.5%	0.01476252
2	Agree	43	2.8%	0.02759949
3	Agree somewhat	160	10.3%	0.10269576
4	Neither agree nor disagree	522	33.5%	0.33504493
5	Disagree somewhat	167	10.7%	0.10718870
6	Disagree	320	20.5%	0.20539153
7	Strongly disagree	158	10.1%	0.10141207
97	No answer	165	10.6%	0.10590501
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri4_5

Variable label:	Voluntary work: I feel that doing voluntary work has a detrimental effect on other things
Pre-question text:	If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question:	I feel that doing voluntary work has a detrimental effect on other things
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	38	2.4%	0.02439024
2	Agree	98	6.3%	0.06290116
3	Agree somewhat	256	16.4%	0.16431322
4	Neither agree nor disagree	478	30.7%	0.30680359
5	Disagree somewhat	169	10.8%	0.10847240
6	Disagree	272	17.5%	0.17458280
7	Strongly disagree	88	5.6%	0.05648267
97	No answer	159	10.2%	0.10205392
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri4_6

Variable label:	Voluntary work: I feel that my involvement is not appreciated
Pre-question text:	If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Literal question:	I feel that my involvement is not appreciated
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	16	1.0%	0.01026958
2	Agree	36	2.3%	0.02310655
3	Agree somewhat	88	5.6%	0.05648267
4	Neither agree nor disagree	534	34.3%	0.34274711
5	Disagree somewhat	152	9.8%	0.09756098
6	Disagree	389	25.0%	0.24967908
7	Strongly disagree	171	11.0%	0.10975610
97	No answer	172	11.0%	0.11039795
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri5

Variable label:	I hvor stor grad er du tilfreds med livet nå om dagen?
Literal question:	To what extent are you satisfied with life at the moment?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	279	17.9%	0.179075738
2	To a great degree	875	56.2%	0.561617458
3	To some degree	325	20.9%	0.208600770
4	To a small degree	54	3.5%	0.034659820
5	Not at all	14	0.9%	0.008985879
97	No answer	11	0.7%	0.007060334
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri6

Variable label:	All in all, to what extent do you think that what you are doing in life is meaningful?
Literal question:	All in all, to what extent do you think that what you are doing in life is meaningful?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	264	16.9%	0.16944801
2	To a great degree	843	54.1%	0.54107831
3	To some degree	343	22.0%	0.22015404
4	To a small degree	59	3.8%	0.03786906
5	Not at all	18	1.2%	0.01155327
97	No answer	31	2.0%	0.01989730
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri7_1

Variable label:	0-10: HAPPY
Pre-question text:	On a scale of 0-10, to what extent did you feel happy, worried or depressed yesterday?
Literal question:	HAPPY
Technical description:	0 means that you did not feel it at all yesterday, while 10 means that you felt it all the time. [Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not at all	14	0.9%	0.008985879
2	1	35	2.2%	0.022464698
3	2	50	3.2%	0.032092426
4	3	55	3.5%	0.035301669
5	4	89	5.7%	0.057124519
6	5	188	12.1%	0.120667522
7	6	228	14.6%	0.146341463
8	7	309	19.8%	0.198331194
9	8	295	18.9%	0.189345315
10	9	154	9.9%	0.098844673
11	10 all the time	66	4.2%	0.042362003
12	No answer	18	1.2%	0.011553273
97	No answer	57	3.7%	0.036585366
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri7_2

Variable label:	0-10: WORRIED
Pre-question text:	On a scale of 0-10, to what extent did you feel happy, worried or depressed yesterday?
Literal question:	WORRIED
Technical description:	0 means that you did not feel it at all yesterday, while 10 means that you felt it all the time. [Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not at all	210	13.5%	0.134788190
2	1	223	14.3%	0.143132221
3	2	270	17.3%	0.173299101
4	3	196	12.6%	0.125802311
5	4	145	9.3%	0.093068036
6	5	127	8.2%	0.081514763
7	6	76	4.9%	0.048780488
8	7	67	4.3%	0.043003851
9	8	36	2.3%	0.023106547
10	9	22	1.4%	0.014120668
11	10 all the time	14	0.9%	0.008985879
12	No answer	19	1.2%	0.012195122
97	No answer	153	9.8%	0.098202824
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri7_3

Variable label:	0-10: DEPRESSED
Pre-question text:	On a scale of 0-10, to what extent did you feel happy, worried or depressed yesterday?
Literal question:	DEPRESSED
Technical description:	0 means that you did not feel it at all yesterday, while 10 means that you felt it all the time. [Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not at all	788	50.6%	0.505776637
2	1	197	12.6%	0.126444159
3	2	102	6.5%	0.065468549
4	3	70	4.5%	0.044929397
5	4	45	2.9%	0.028883184
6	5	39	2.5%	0.025032092
7	6	31	2.0%	0.019897304
8	7	25	1.6%	0.016046213
9	8	15	1.0%	0.009627728
10	9	6	0.4%	0.003851091
11	10 all the time	8	0.5%	0.005134788
12	No answer	34	2.2%	0.021822850
97	No answer	198	12.7%	0.127086008
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri8_1

Variable label:	Statement: In most ways my life is almost ideal
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
Literal question:	In most ways my life is almost ideal
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	93	6.0%	0.05969191
2	Agree	443	28.4%	0.28433890
3	Agree somewhat	478	30.7%	0.30680359
4	Neither agree nor disagree	215	13.8%	0.13799743
5	Disagree somewhat	154	9.9%	0.09884467
6	Disagree	90	5.8%	0.05776637
7	Strongly disagree	43	2.8%	0.02759949
97	No answer	42	2.7%	0.02695764
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri8_2

Variable label:	Statement: My circumstances are excellent
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
Literal question:	My circumstances are excellent
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	158	10.1%	0.10141207
2	Agree	580	37.2%	0.37227214
3	Agree somewhat	398	25.5%	0.25545571
4	Neither agree nor disagree	131	8.4%	0.08408216
5	Disagree somewhat	150	9.6%	0.09627728
6	Disagree	76	4.9%	0.04878049
7	Strongly disagree	23	1.5%	0.01476252
97	No answer	42	2.7%	0.02695764
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri8_3

Variable label:	Statement: So far I have got most of the things I have wanted in life
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
Literal question:	So far I have got most of the things I have wanted in life
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	204	13.1%	0.13093710
2	Agree	571	36.6%	0.36649551
3	Agree somewhat	386	24.8%	0.24775353
4	Neither agree nor disagree	127	8.2%	0.08151476
5	Disagree somewhat	136	8.7%	0.08729140
6	Disagree	76	4.9%	0.04878049
7	Strongly disagree	22	1.4%	0.01412067
97	No answer	36	2.3%	0.02310655
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri8_4

Variable label:	Statement: I am satisfied with my life
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
Literal question:	I am satisfied with my life
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	230	14.8%	0.14762516
2	Agree	760	48.8%	0.48780488
3	Agree somewhat	297	19.1%	0.19062901
4	Neither agree nor disagree	81	5.2%	0.05198973
5	Disagree somewhat	96	6.2%	0.06161746
6	Disagree	42	2.7%	0.02695764
7	Strongly disagree	18	1.2%	0.01155327
97	No answer	34	2.2%	0.02182285
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri8_5

Variable label:	Statement: If I could relive my life, I would not really change anything
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
Literal question:	If I could relive my life, I would not really change anything
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	68	4.4%	0.04364570
2	Agree	252	16.2%	0.16174583
3	Agree somewhat	369	23.7%	0.23684211
4	Neither agree nor disagree	171	11.0%	0.10975610
5	Disagree somewhat	367	23.6%	0.23555841
6	Disagree	196	12.6%	0.12580231
7	Strongly disagree	99	6.4%	0.06354300
97	No answer	36	2.3%	0.02310655
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri9_1

Variable label:	Satisfied with: Your standard of living
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	Your standard of living?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	406	26.1%	0.260590501
2	Satisfied	876	56.2%	0.562259307
3	Slightly satisfied	193	12.4%	0.123876765
4	Not very satisfied	50	3.2%	0.032092426
5	Not at all satisfied	11	0.7%	0.007060334
97	No answer	22	1.4%	0.014120668
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri9_2

Variable label:	Satisfied with: Your health
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	Your health?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	323	20.7%	0.20731707
2	Satisfied	709	45.5%	0.45507060
3	Slightly satisfied	327	21.0%	0.20988447
4	Not very satisfied	115	7.4%	0.07381258
5	Not at all satisfied	59	3.8%	0.03786906
97	No answer	25	1.6%	0.01604621
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri9_3

Variable label:	Satisfied with: What you are achieving in life
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	What you are achieving in life?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	162	10.4%	0.10397946
2	Satisfied	871	55.9%	0.55905006
3	Slightly satisfied	378	24.3%	0.24261874
4	Not very satisfied	86	5.5%	0.05519897
5	Not at all satisfied	24	1.5%	0.01540436
97	No answer	37	2.4%	0.02374840
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri9_4

Variable label:	Satisfied with: Your personal relationships
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	Your personal relationships?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	247	15.9%	0.15853659
2	Satisfied	834	53.5%	0.53530167
3	Slightly satisfied	349	22.4%	0.22400513
4	Not very satisfied	75	4.8%	0.04813864
5	Not at all satisfied	19	1.2%	0.01219512
97	No answer	34	2.2%	0.02182285
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri9_5

Variable label:	Satisfied with: How safe you feel
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	How safe you feel?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	416	26.7%	0.26700899
2	Satisfied	839	53.9%	0.53851091
3	Slightly satisfied	213	13.7%	0.13671374
4	Not very satisfied	44	2.8%	0.02824134
5	Not at all satisfied	17	1.1%	0.01091142
97	No answer	29	1.9%	0.01861361
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri9_6

Variable label:	Satisfied with: The feeling of being part of a neighbourhood community
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	The feeling of being part of a neighbourhood community?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	143	9.2%	0.09178434
2	Satisfied	600	38.5%	0.38510911
3	Slightly satisfied	519	33.3%	0.33311938
4	Not very satisfied	184	11.8%	0.11810013
5	Not at all satisfied	54	3.5%	0.03465982
97	No answer	58	3.7%	0.03722721
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri9_7

Variable label:	Satisfied with: The prospects for safety in the future
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	The prospects for safety in the future?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	208	13.4%	0.13350449
2	Satisfied	831	53.3%	0.53337612
3	Slightly satisfied	354	22.7%	0.22721438
4	Not very satisfied	94	6.0%	0.06033376
5	Not at all satisfied	40	2.6%	0.02567394
97	No answer	31	2.0%	0.01989730
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri9_8

Variable label:	Satisfied with: The amount of time you have to do the things you like doing
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	The amount of time you have to do the things you like doing?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	160	10.3%	0.10269576
2	Satisfied	706	45.3%	0.45314506
3	Slightly satisfied	434	27.9%	0.27856226
4	Not very satisfied	187	12.0%	0.12002567
5	Not at all satisfied	45	2.9%	0.02888318
97	No answer	26	1.7%	0.01668806
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri9_9

Variable label:	Satisfied with: The quality of nature and the environment in your local area
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	The quality of nature and the environment in your local area?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	553	35.5%	0.354942234
2	Satisfied	755	48.5%	0.484595635
3	Slightly satisfied	170	10.9%	0.109114249
4	Not very satisfied	38	2.4%	0.024390244
5	Not at all satisfied	12	0.8%	0.007702182
97	No answer	30	1.9%	0.019255456
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri9_10

Variable label:	Satisfied with: Your job
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	Your job?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	238	15.3%	0.15275995
2	Satisfied	625	40.1%	0.40115533
3	Slightly satisfied	240	15.4%	0.15404365
4	Not very satisfied	60	3.9%	0.03851091
5	Not at all satisfied	33	2.1%	0.02118100
6	Not relevant	316	20.3%	0.20282413
97	No answer	46	3.0%	0.02952503
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri10

Variable label:	Your life, five years in the future
Literal question:	If you think about your life situation in five years’ time, do you think it will be …
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Worse than it is at the moment	97	6.2%	0.06225931
2	Similar to how it is now	974	62.5%	0.62516046
3	Better than it is at the moment	461	29.6%	0.29589217
97	No answer	26	1.7%	0.01668806
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri11

Variable label:	Generally speaking, how good is your health?
Literal question:	Generally speaking, how good is your health?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Excellent	237	15.2%	0.15211810
2	Very good	704	45.2%	0.45186136
3	Fairly good	495	31.8%	0.31771502
4	Poor	93	6.0%	0.05969191
97	No answer	29	1.9%	0.01861361
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri12

Variable label:	Suffer from chronic illnesses or health problem
Literal question:	Do you suffer from any chronic illnesses or health problems which are expected to last for at least six months or more?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	593	38.1%	0.38061617
2	No	872	56.0%	0.55969191
3	Do not wish to reply	64	4.1%	0.04107831
97	No answer	29	1.9%	0.01861361
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri13

Variable label:	Have been prevented from undertaking any activities due to health problems
Literal question:	During the last six months have you been prevented from undertaking any activities that people usually do due to health problems?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes, very inhibited	94	6.0%	0.06033376
2	Yes, inhibited	375	24.1%	0.24069320
3	No, not inhibited	1045	67.1%	0.67073171
97	No answer	44	2.8%	0.02824134
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri14

Variable label:	Have participated in any protests or demonstrations during the past year
Literal question:	Have you participated in any protests or demonstrations during the past year in an attempt to bring about improvements in society?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	224	14.4%	0.14377407
2	No	1305	83.8%	0.83761232
97	No answer	29	1.9%	0.01861361
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri15

Variable label:	Who organized the most recent protest or demonstration that you participated in
Literal question:	If you cast your mind back to the most recent protest or demonstration that you participated in, who was it organised by?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and R4FRI14=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A voluntary organisation, union or party	188	83.9%	0.839285714
2	Individuals or a non-organised group or network	34	15.2%	0.151785714
97	No answer	2	0.9%	0.008928571
98	Not asked	6073		NA

r4fri16

Variable label:	Type of organisation, union or party
Literal question:	What type of organisation, union or party was it?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and R4FRI15=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Art and culture, band and choir	2	1.1%	0.010638298
2	Athletics and sport	1	0.5%	0.005319149
3	Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity	1	0.5%	0.005319149
4	Education, training and research	13	6.9%	0.069148936
5	Health, nursing and rescue work	2	1.1%	0.010638298
6	Social services and substance abuse care	3	1.6%	0.015957447
7	Nature, environmental and animal protection	19	10.1%	0.101063830
8	Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood	4	2.1%	0.021276596
9	Housing co-operatives and housing associations	0	0.0%	0.000000000
10	Rights, support and advocacy work	25	13.3%	0.132978723
11	Political parties	17	9.0%	0.090425532
12	International exchange, emergency help, aid and human rights work	21	11.2%	0.111702128
13	Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations	66	35.1%	0.351063830
14	Religion and faiths, including the Church of Norway	2	1.1%	0.010638298
15	Immigrant organisations	0	0.0%	0.000000000
16	Other	11	5.9%	0.058510638
97	No answer	1	0.5%	0.005319149
98	Not asked	6109		NA

r4fri16_16_other

Variable label:	Other: Type of organisation, union or party [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What type of organisation, union or party was it?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4fri17

Variable label:	How did you first hear about this protest?
Literal question:	How did you first hear about this protest?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and R4FRI14=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Through an organisation, union or party which I am a member of	91	40.6%	0.406250000
2	Through colleagues at work or fellow students	12	5.4%	0.053571429
3	Through social networks, friends and acquaintances	62	27.7%	0.276785714
4	Through the media	47	21.0%	0.209821429
5	In a different way	11	4.9%	0.049107143
97	No answer	1	0.4%	0.004464286
98	Not asked	6073		NA

r4fri18

Variable label:	In what way did you first hear about this protest?
Literal question:	In what way did you first hear about this protest?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and R4FRI14=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Talking face to face	31	13.8%	0.138392857
2	Telephone conversation	5	2.2%	0.022321429
3	SMS	9	4.0%	0.040178571
4	Posters/notices	8	3.6%	0.035714286
5	Newspapers/magazines	23	10.3%	0.102678571
6	Online newspapers	9	4.0%	0.040178571
7	E-mail	47	21.0%	0.209821429
8	Facebook	54	24.1%	0.241071429
9	Other social media	5	2.2%	0.022321429
10	TV/radio	17	7.6%	0.075892857
11	Other	14	6.2%	0.062500000
97	No answer	2	0.9%	0.008928571
98	Not asked	6073		NA

r4fri19

Variable label:	Active within non-profit organizations in youth
Literal question:	If you think back to your youth, to what extent were you actively involved with associations and organisations?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very involved	380	24.4%	0.24390244
2	Slightly involved	550	35.3%	0.35301669
3	Not very involved	376	24.1%	0.24133504
4	Not at all involved	199	12.8%	0.12772786
5	Don't know	31	2.0%	0.01989730
97	No answer	22	1.4%	0.01412067
98	Not asked	4739		NA

r4fri20

Variable label:	Which memberships are important
Literal question:	You have previously stated that you are a member of one or more of the voluntary organisations listed below. Which membership category do you consider to be the most important one for you?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to be member in more than one voluntary organization.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Art and culture, band and choir	69	12.2%	0.121908127
2	Athletics and sport	110	19.4%	0.194346290
3	Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity	65	11.5%	0.114840989
4	Education, training and research	13	2.3%	0.022968198
5	Health, nursing and rescue work	16	2.8%	0.028268551
6	Social services and substance abuse care	11	1.9%	0.019434629
7	Nature, environmental and animal protection	27	4.8%	0.047703180
8	Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood	37	6.5%	0.065371025
9	Housing co-operatives and housing associations	20	3.5%	0.035335689
10	Rights, support and advocacy work	13	2.3%	0.022968198
11	Political parties	25	4.4%	0.044169611
12	International exchange, emergency help, aid and human rights work	40	7.1%	0.070671378
13	Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations	61	10.8%	0.107773852
14	Religion and faiths, including the Church of Norway	45	8.0%	0.079505300
15	Immigrant organisations	1	0.2%	0.001766784
16	Other	0	0.0%	0.000000000
97	No answer	13	2.3%	0.022968198
98	Not asked	5731		NA

r4fri21_1

Variable label:	Text: Reason for joining [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	You have previously stated that you are a member of a voluntary organisation operating in the following area: “^{f(‘w03_FR2’)}”. What was the most important reason for your decision to join this organisation?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to be member in one voluntary organization.] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4fri21_2

Variable label:	Text: Reason for joining [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What was the most important reason for your decision to join this organisation?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if R4FRI20 is answered] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4fri22

Variable label:	Category of voluntary work [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	You have previously stated that you have undertaken voluntary work one or more of the voluntary organisations listed below. Which category encompasses the organisation for which you have done most voluntary work during the past year?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for more than one voluntary organization.] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Art and culture, band and choir	61	13.2%	0.132321041
2	Athletics and sport	112	24.3%	0.242950108
3	Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity	50	10.8%	0.108459870
4	Education, training and research	21	4.6%	0.045553145
5	Health, nursing and rescue work	19	4.1%	0.041214751
6	Social services and substance abuse care	11	2.4%	0.023861171
7	Nature, environmental and animal protection	7	1.5%	0.015184382
8	Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood	37	8.0%	0.080260304
9	Housing co-operatives and housing associations	31	6.7%	0.067245119
10	Rights, support and advocacy work	8	1.7%	0.017353579
11	Political parties	12	2.6%	0.026030369
12	International exchange, emergency help, aid and human rights work	12	2.6%	0.026030369
13	Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations	25	5.4%	0.054229935
14	Religion and faiths, including the Church of Norway	43	9.3%	0.093275488
15	Immigrant organisations	1	0.2%	0.002169197
16	Other	0	0.0%	0.000000000
97	No answer	11	2.4%	0.023861171
98	Not asked	5836		NA

r4fri23_1

Variable label:	Voluntary work, duration
Literal question:	You have previously stated that you have undertaken voluntary work for a voluntary organisation operating in the following area: “^{f(‘w03_FR2’)}”. How long did you do voluntary work for this organisation?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for more than one voluntary organization.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Less than a month	27	10.0%	0.10037175
2	One month-six months	13	4.8%	0.04832714
3	Six months-one year	14	5.2%	0.05204461
4	1-2 years	49	18.2%	0.18215613
5	3-5 years	48	17.8%	0.17843866
6	6-10 years	27	10.0%	0.10037175
7	11-25 years	41	15.2%	0.15241636
8	More than 25 years	23	8.6%	0.08550186
97	No answer	27	10.0%	0.10037175
98	Not asked	6028		NA

r4fri23_2

Variable label:	Voluntary work, duration
Literal question:	How long did you do voluntary work for this organisation?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if R4FRI22 is answered]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Less than a month	20	1.3%	0.012928248
2	One month-six months	12	0.8%	0.007756949
3	Six months-one year	26	1.7%	0.016806723
4	1-2 years	67	4.3%	0.043309632
5	3-5 years	93	6.0%	0.060116354
6	6-10 years	81	5.2%	0.052359405
7	11-25 years	83	5.4%	0.053652230
8	More than 25 years	59	3.8%	0.038138332
97	No answer	1106	71.5%	0.714932127
98	Not asked	4750		NA

r4fri24_1

Variable label:	Statement: I feel better about myself or more meaningful
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When I do voluntary work for this organisation….
Literal question:	I feel better about myself or more meaningful
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	37	5.1%	0.050684932
2	Agree	201	27.5%	0.275342466
3	Agree somewhat	195	26.7%	0.267123288
4	Neither agree nor disagree	218	29.9%	0.298630137
5	Disagree somewhat	20	2.7%	0.027397260
6	Disagree	15	2.1%	0.020547945
7	Strongly disagree	5	0.7%	0.006849315
97	No answer	39	5.3%	0.053424658
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri24_2

Variable label:	Statement: I feel that I learn new and interesting things
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When I do voluntary work for this organisation….
Literal question:	I feel that I learn new and interesting things
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	64	8.8%	0.087671233
2	Agree	257	35.2%	0.352054795
3	Agree somewhat	209	28.6%	0.286301370
4	Neither agree nor disagree	117	16.0%	0.160273973
5	Disagree somewhat	25	3.4%	0.034246575
6	Disagree	13	1.8%	0.017808219
7	Strongly disagree	5	0.7%	0.006849315
97	No answer	40	5.5%	0.054794521
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri24_3

Variable label:	Statement: I obtain experiences which could be useful for undertaking non-voluntary work
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When I do voluntary work for this organisation….
Literal question:	I obtain experiences which could be useful for undertaking non-voluntary work
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	52	7.1%	0.07123288
2	Agree	194	26.6%	0.26575342
3	Agree somewhat	153	21.0%	0.20958904
4	Neither agree nor disagree	186	25.5%	0.25479452
5	Disagree somewhat	43	5.9%	0.05890411
6	Disagree	40	5.5%	0.05479452
7	Strongly disagree	9	1.2%	0.01232877
97	No answer	53	7.3%	0.07260274
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri24_4

Variable label:	Statement: I have the opportunity to do something tangible about an issue which interests me
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When I do voluntary work for this organisation….
Literal question:	I have the opportunity to do something tangible about an issue which interests me
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	98	13.4%	0.134246575
2	Agree	293	40.1%	0.401369863
3	Agree somewhat	164	22.5%	0.224657534
4	Neither agree nor disagree	106	14.5%	0.145205479
5	Disagree somewhat	17	2.3%	0.023287671
6	Disagree	8	1.1%	0.010958904
7	Strongly disagree	5	0.7%	0.006849315
97	No answer	39	5.3%	0.053424658
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri24_5

Variable label:	Statement: I have the opportunity to spend time with friends or acquaintances
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When I do voluntary work for this organisation….
Literal question:	I have the opportunity to spend time with friends or acquaintances
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	93	12.7%	0.127397260
2	Agree	286	39.2%	0.391780822
3	Agree somewhat	164	22.5%	0.224657534
4	Neither agree nor disagree	99	13.6%	0.135616438
5	Disagree somewhat	23	3.2%	0.031506849
6	Disagree	19	2.6%	0.026027397
7	Strongly disagree	6	0.8%	0.008219178
97	No answer	40	5.5%	0.054794521
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri24_6

Variable label:	Statement: I forget any problems that otherwise affect my life
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When I do voluntary work for this organisation….
Literal question:	I forget any problems that otherwise affect my life
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	31	4.2%	0.04246575
2	Agree	95	13.0%	0.13013699
3	Agree somewhat	124	17.0%	0.16986301
4	Neither agree nor disagree	241	33.0%	0.33013699
5	Disagree somewhat	47	6.4%	0.06438356
6	Disagree	100	13.7%	0.13698630
7	Strongly disagree	49	6.7%	0.06712329
97	No answer	43	5.9%	0.05890411
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri25_1

Variable label:	Statement: The work I do has clearly defined targets
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the work that you do for this organisation?
Literal question:	The work I do has clearly defined targets
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	70	9.6%	0.095890411
2	Agree	297	40.7%	0.406849315
3	Agree somewhat	179	24.5%	0.245205479
4	Neither agree nor disagree	100	13.7%	0.136986301
5	Disagree somewhat	18	2.5%	0.024657534
6	Disagree	11	1.5%	0.015068493
7	Strongly disagree	1	0.1%	0.001369863
97	No answer	54	7.4%	0.073972603
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri25_2

Variable label:	Statement: It is easy for me to find out if I am doing my work well
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the work that you do for this organisation?
Literal question:	It is easy for me to find out if I am doing my work well
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	46	6.3%	0.063013699
2	Agree	289	39.6%	0.395890411
3	Agree somewhat	176	24.1%	0.241095890
4	Neither agree nor disagree	125	17.1%	0.171232877
5	Disagree somewhat	29	4.0%	0.039726027
6	Disagree	7	1.0%	0.009589041
7	Strongly disagree	3	0.4%	0.004109589
97	No answer	55	7.5%	0.075342466
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri25_3

Variable label:	Statement: The work I do is extremely useful
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the work that you do for this organisation?
Literal question:	The work I do is extremely useful
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	61	8.4%	0.083561644
2	Agree	283	38.8%	0.387671233
3	Agree somewhat	191	26.2%	0.261643836
4	Neither agree nor disagree	113	15.5%	0.154794521
5	Disagree somewhat	18	2.5%	0.024657534
6	Disagree	5	0.7%	0.006849315
7	Strongly disagree	2	0.3%	0.002739726
97	No answer	57	7.8%	0.078082192
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri25_4

Variable label:	Statement: I am interested in the future of the organisation
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the work that you do for this organisation?
Literal question:	I am interested in the future of the organisation
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	109	14.9%	0.149315068
2	Agree	336	46.0%	0.460273973
3	Agree somewhat	113	15.5%	0.154794521
4	Neither agree nor disagree	103	14.1%	0.141095890
5	Disagree somewhat	7	1.0%	0.009589041
6	Disagree	5	0.7%	0.006849315
7	Strongly disagree	2	0.3%	0.002739726
97	No answer	55	7.5%	0.075342466
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri25_5

Variable label:	Statement: The organisation’s values are very similar to my own values
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the work that you do for this organisation?
Literal question:	The organisation’s values are very similar to my own values
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	92	12.6%	0.126027397
2	Agree	287	39.3%	0.393150685
3	Agree somewhat	120	16.4%	0.164383562
4	Neither agree nor disagree	158	21.6%	0.216438356
5	Disagree somewhat	14	1.9%	0.019178082
6	Disagree	6	0.8%	0.008219178
7	Strongly disagree	0	0.0%	0.000000000
97	No answer	53	7.3%	0.072602740
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri25_6

Variable label:	Statement: I am proud of being able to say that I am associated with this organisation
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the work that you do for this organisation?
Literal question:	I am proud of being able to say that I am associated with this organisation
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	116	15.9%	0.15890411
2	Agree	285	39.0%	0.39041096
3	Agree somewhat	115	15.8%	0.15753425
4	Neither agree nor disagree	138	18.9%	0.18904110
5	Disagree somewhat	9	1.2%	0.01232877
6	Disagree	11	1.5%	0.01506849
7	Strongly disagree	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	56	7.7%	0.07671233
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri26_1

Variable label:	Satisfied with organization: manages its volunteers
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with the way in which the organisation…
Literal question:	manages its volunteers
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	47	6.4%	0.06438356
2	To a great degree	273	37.4%	0.37397260
3	To some degree	286	39.2%	0.39178082
4	To a small degree	50	6.8%	0.06849315
5	Not at all	17	2.3%	0.02328767
97	No answer	57	7.8%	0.07808219
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri26_2

Variable label:	Satisfied with organization: provide volunteers with training
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with the way in which the organisation…
Literal question:	provide volunteers with training
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	39	5.3%	0.05342466
2	To a great degree	217	29.7%	0.29726027
3	To some degree	301	41.2%	0.41232877
4	To a small degree	86	11.8%	0.11780822
5	Not at all	25	3.4%	0.03424658
97	No answer	62	8.5%	0.08493151
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri26_3

Variable label:	Satisfied with organization: solves problems which arise in connection with voluntary work
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with the way in which the organisation…
Literal question:	solves problems which arise in connection with voluntary work
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	40	5.5%	0.05479452
2	To a great degree	269	36.8%	0.36849315
3	To some degree	286	39.2%	0.39178082
4	To a small degree	52	7.1%	0.07123288
5	Not at all	15	2.1%	0.02054795
97	No answer	68	9.3%	0.09315068
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri27

Variable label:	Satisfied with organization, overall
Literal question:	All in all, how satisfied are you with your experience of being a volunteer with this organisation?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	83	11.4%	0.11369863
2	To a great degree	354	48.5%	0.48493151
3	To some degree	202	27.7%	0.27671233
4	To a small degree	25	3.4%	0.03424658
5	Not at all	11	1.5%	0.01506849
97	No answer	55	7.5%	0.07534247
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4fri28

Variable label:	How likely is it that you will still be working as a volunteer for this organisation two years from now?
Literal question:	How likely is it that you will still be working as a volunteer for this organisation two years from now?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very likely	168	23.0%	0.23013699
2	Likely	220	30.1%	0.30136986
3	Somewhat likely	135	18.5%	0.18493151
4	Not very likely	99	13.6%	0.13561644
5	Not likely at all	59	8.1%	0.08082192
97	No answer	49	6.7%	0.06712329
98	Not asked	5567		NA

r4ran3

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1607] [Invalid:4690] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	811	50.5%	0.5046671
2	2	796	49.5%	0.4953329
Sysmiss		4690		NA

r4km2_1

Variable label:	Statement: The world would be more peaceful if wealth was more evenly distributed between countries.
Pre-question text:	We would like to know something about your views about society in general, but especially about climate issues. First we will ask you about society. Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	The world would be more peaceful if wealth was more evenly distributed between countries.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	23	2.8%	0.02836005
2	Disagree	67	8.3%	0.08261406
3	Disagree somewhat	56	6.9%	0.06905055
4	Neither agree nor disagree	100	12.3%	0.12330456
5	Agree somewhat	218	26.9%	0.26880395
6	Agree	221	27.3%	0.27250308
7	Strongly Agree	117	14.4%	0.14426634
97	No answer	9	1.1%	0.01109741
98	Not asked	5486		NA

r4km2_2

Variable label:	Statement: Society needs more justice so that wealth can be distributed more evenly.
Pre-question text:	We would like to know something about your views about society in general, but especially about climate issues. First we will ask you about society. Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Society needs more justice so that wealth can be distributed more evenly.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	16	2.0%	0.01972873
2	Disagree	49	6.0%	0.06041924
3	Disagree somewhat	92	11.3%	0.11344020
4	Neither agree nor disagree	98	12.1%	0.12083847
5	Agree somewhat	262	32.3%	0.32305795
6	Agree	190	23.4%	0.23427867
7	Strongly Agree	91	11.2%	0.11220715
97	No answer	13	1.6%	0.01602959
98	Not asked	5486		NA

r4km2_3

Variable label:	Statement: I support tax reforms which would make companies and people on high incomes pay more tax.
Pre-question text:	We would like to know something about your views about society in general, but especially about climate issues. First we will ask you about society. Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	I support tax reforms which would make companies and people on high incomes pay more tax.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	22	2.7%	0.02712700
2	Disagree	79	9.7%	0.09741060
3	Disagree somewhat	71	8.8%	0.08754624
4	Neither agree nor disagree	77	9.5%	0.09494451
5	Agree somewhat	269	33.2%	0.33168927
6	Agree	197	24.3%	0.24290999
7	Strongly Agree	84	10.4%	0.10357583
97	No answer	12	1.5%	0.01479655
98	Not asked	5486		NA

r4km2_4

Variable label:	Statement: Everyone should have equal opportunities for succeeding or failing without the authorities becoming involved.
Pre-question text:	We would like to know something about your views about society in general, but especially about climate issues. First we will ask you about society. Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Everyone should have equal opportunities for succeeding or failing without the authorities becoming involved.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	25	3.1%	0.03082614
2	Disagree	51	6.3%	0.06288533
3	Disagree somewhat	119	14.7%	0.14673243
4	Neither agree nor disagree	180	22.2%	0.22194821
5	Agree somewhat	191	23.6%	0.23551171
6	Agree	181	22.3%	0.22318126
7	Strongly Agree	44	5.4%	0.05425401
97	No answer	20	2.5%	0.02466091
98	Not asked	5486		NA

r4km2_5

Variable label:	Statement: Market competition is almost always the best way of meeting people’s requirements.
Pre-question text:	We would like to know something about your views about society in general, but especially about climate issues. First we will ask you about society. Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Market competition is almost always the best way of meeting people’s requirements.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	44	5.4%	0.05425401
2	Disagree	145	17.9%	0.17879162
3	Disagree somewhat	167	20.6%	0.20591862
4	Neither agree nor disagree	162	20.0%	0.19975339
5	Agree somewhat	169	20.8%	0.20838471
6	Agree	90	11.1%	0.11097411
7	Strongly Agree	17	2.1%	0.02096178
97	No answer	17	2.1%	0.02096178
98	Not asked	5486		NA

r4km2_6

Variable label:	Statement: If the system is fair the cleverest people should earn the most money.
Pre-question text:	We would like to know something about your views about society in general, but especially about climate issues. First we will ask you about society. Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	If the system is fair the cleverest people should earn the most money.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	40	4.9%	0.04932182
2	Disagree	86	10.6%	0.10604192
3	Disagree somewhat	92	11.3%	0.11344020
4	Neither agree nor disagree	129	15.9%	0.15906289
5	Agree somewhat	280	34.5%	0.34525277
6	Agree	124	15.3%	0.15289766
7	Strongly Agree	46	5.7%	0.05672010
97	No answer	14	1.7%	0.01726264
98	Not asked	5486		NA

r4ran4

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:808] [Invalid:5489] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	176	21.8%	0.2178218
2	2	147	18.2%	0.1819307
3	3	140	17.3%	0.1732673
4	4	184	22.8%	0.2277228
5	5	161	19.9%	0.1992574
Sysmiss		5489		NA

R4KM3a

Variable label:	Vignette 1
Literal question:	We are interested in knowing how people perceive and interpret texts about climate issues. Below you will find a text about this very subject. We would ask you to read through the whole text and then answer a few questions. We are keen to know what you think about the content and we understand that you will not remember all the details. If the world continues to release climate gasses at the current rate, climate changes in Norway would cause substantial increases in precipitation. Norsk Næringsliv (Norwegian Trade and Industry) wishes to exploit this opportunity in order to promote investments in the development of hydroelectric power and wind power. Norway could then export more oil and gas and thus strengthen the Norwegian economy. But the radical Grønn Verden (Green World) environmental organisation is promoting its industry-hostile agenda in an attempt to curb the oil industry. However, Norsk Næringsliv wishes to reveal the undue political pressure being exerted by the environmental lobby. They have emphasised that Norway would not have to impose harmful restrictions on individuals and trade and industry if more oil and gas was extracted. At the same time Norway could then fund reductions in foreign emissions and continue with its economic growth.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and r4ran4=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:176] [Invalid:6121] [Range:1-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Exposed for vignette	176	100.0%	1
Sysmiss		6121		NA

R4KM3b

Variable label:	Vignette 2
Literal question:	We are interested in knowing how people perceive and interpret texts about climate issues. Below you will find a text about this very subject. We would ask you to read through the whole text and then answer a few questions. We are keen to know what you think about the content and we understand that you will not remember all the details. If the world continues to release climate gasses at the current rate, climate changes in Norway would cause substantial increases in precipitation and dramatic rises in sea levels. People throughout the country would consequently be exposed to considerable risks and their lifestyle would suffer. Norsk Næringsliv wishes to combat climate change by using a quota trading system. This would allow companies to reduce their CO2 emissions by purchasing and selling climate quotas. However, the radical Grønn Verden environmental organisation is promoting its own destructive agenda. They are fighting to undermine free market forces. while Norsk Næringsliv wishes to reveal the undue political pressure being exerted by the environmental lobby. They have emphasised that climate quotas would remove the need for more controlled emissions which threaten growth. With the freedom to invest, Norwegian trade and industry could retain its economic growth and reduce CO2 emissions at the same time.
Post-question:	[Asked if U=2 and r4ran4=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:147] [Invalid:6150] [Range:1-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Exposed for vignette	147	100.0%	1
Sysmiss		6150		NA

R4KM3c

Variable label:	Vignette 3
Literal question:	We are interested in knowing how people perceive and interpret texts about climate issues. Below you will find a text about this very subject. We would ask you to read through the whole text and then answer a few questions. We are keen to know what you think about the content and we understand that you will not remember all the details. If the world continues to release climate gasses at the current rate, climate changes in Norway would cause substantial increases in precipitation. The Grønn Verden environmental organisation wishes to exploit this opportunity to promote investments in hydroelectric power and wind power. Norway could then reduce its exports of oil and gas and thus reduce emissions. But the for-profit trade and industry organisation, Norsk Næringsliv, is promoting its own greedy agenda in order to strengthen the oil industry. However, Grønn Verden wishes to reveal the undue political pressure being exerted by the petroleum lobby. They have emphasised that developing a strong energy sector based on renewable sources of energy would help to ensure continued prosperity in Norway. We could then cut CO2 emissions at both national and international level without the energy requirements of individuals and trade and industry being affected.
Post-question:	[Asked if U=2 and r4ran4=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:140] [Invalid:6157] [Range:1-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Exposed for vignette	140	100.0%	1
Sysmiss		6157		NA

R4KM3d

Variable label:	Vignette 4
Literal question:	We are interested in knowing how people perceive and interpret texts about climate issues. Below you will find a text about this very subject. We would ask you to read through the whole text and then answer a few questions. We are keen to know what you think about the content and we understand that you will not remember all the details. If the world continues to release climate gasses at the current rate, climate changes in Norway would cause substantial increases in precipitation and dramatic rises in sea levels. People throughout the country would consequently be exposed to considerable risks and their lifestyle would suffer. The Grønn Verden environmental organisation wants to combat climate change by introducing a tax on the climate gas, CO2, in order to reduce emissions. But the for-profit trade and industry organisation, Norsk Næringsliv, is promoting its own greedy agenda. They are fighting constantly against solutions such as taxing CO2 emissions in order to enrich themselves, However, Grønn Verden wishes to reveal the undue political pressure being exerted by the petroleum lobby. They have emphasised that a CO2 tax would remove the financial benefits enjoyed by climate-hostile businesses. By using the extra income generated by such a tax, society could redistribute wealth more fairly and support investments in renewable energy.
Post-question:	[Asked if U=2 and r4ran4=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:184] [Invalid:6113] [Range:1-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Exposed for vignette	184	100.0%	1
Sysmiss		6113		NA

R4KM3e

Variable label:	Vignette 5
Literal question:	We are interested in knowing how people perceive and interpret texts about climate issues. Below you will find a text about this very subject. We would ask you to read through the whole text and then answer a few questions. We are keen to know what you think about the content and we understand that you will not remember all the details. The text contains the possible consequences of climate change which have been identified by climate research for Norway during this century if the world’s climate gas emissions remain at current levels. Average precipitation will increase by 23%. Extreme precipitation will increase by up to 70%. The number of days with high precipitation will increase. The average air temperature will increase by 4.6 degrees. Winters will be 6 degrees warmer. The number of days with snow will be reduced by up to 3 months. There will be almost no snow along the coast and in low-lying areas. The sea level will increased by up to 50 cm in Oslo and by 80 cm in Bergen. The sea temperature in the North Sea and along the coast will increase by up to 2.5 degrees. The sea will become more acid (the pH level of the sea will drop) to a level which has not been seen during the last 20 million years. The Arctic will be ice-free during the summer.
Post-question:	[Asked if U=2 and r4ran4=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:161] [Invalid:6136] [Range:1-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Exposed for vignette	161	100.0%	1
Sysmiss		6136		NA

r4km4a_1

Variable label:	Response to text: In your opinion, how much of a threat does the text think that climate change poses?
Literal question:	In your opinion, how much of a threat does the text think that climate change poses?
Technical description:	Please answer by using a scale of zero (0) to , where zero represents “no threat whatsoever” and 10 represents “extreme threat”. [Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not threat whatsoever	26	3.2%	0.03205919
2	1	15	1.8%	0.01849568
3	2	36	4.4%	0.04438964
4	3	61	7.5%	0.07521578
5	4	43	5.3%	0.05302096
6	5	95	11.7%	0.11713933
7	6	64	7.9%	0.07891492
8	7	113	13.9%	0.13933416
9	8	136	16.8%	0.16769420
10	9	89	11.0%	0.10974106
11	10 extreme threat	70	8.6%	0.08631319
97	No answer	48	5.9%	0.05918619
98	Not asked	5486		NA
99	No answer	15	1.8%	0.01849568

r4km4b_1

Variable label:	Response to text: How much confidence do have about the veracity of the scenarios presented in the text?
Literal question:	How much confidence do have about the veracity of the scenarios presented in the text?
Technical description:	Please answer by using a scale of zero (0) to , where zero represents “no confidence” and 10 represents ““full confidence”. [Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 no confidence	63	7.8%	0.07768187
2	1	42	5.2%	0.05178792
3	2	64	7.9%	0.07891492
4	3	84	10.4%	0.10357583
5	4	83	10.2%	0.10234279
6	5	134	16.5%	0.16522811
7	6	76	9.4%	0.09371147
8	7	94	11.6%	0.11590629
9	8	59	7.3%	0.07274969
10	9	19	2.3%	0.02342787
11	10 full confidence	16	2.0%	0.01972873
97	No answer	61	7.5%	0.07521578
98	Not asked	5486		NA
99	No answer	16	2.0%	0.01972873

r4km4c_1

Variable label:	Response to text: What is your overall reaction to the text you have read?
Literal question:	What is your overall reaction to the text you have read?
Technical description:	Please answer by using a scale of zero (0) to , where zero represents “highly negative” and 10 represents ““highly positive”. [Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 highly negative	41	5.1%	0.050554871
2	1	47	5.8%	0.057953144
3	2	72	8.9%	0.088779285
4	3	89	11.0%	0.109741060
5	4	113	13.9%	0.139334155
6	5	172	21.2%	0.212083847
7	6	58	7.2%	0.071516646
8	7	71	8.8%	0.087546239
9	8	33	4.1%	0.040690506
10	9	11	1.4%	0.013563502
11	10 highly positive	4	0.5%	0.004932182
97	No answer	74	9.1%	0.091245376
98	Not asked	5486		NA
99	No answer	26	3.2%	0.032059186

r4km4d_1

Variable label:	How much of a threat do you think climate change will pose to you personally during the next 50 years?
Literal question:	How much of a threat do you think climate change will pose to you personally during the next 50 years?
Technical description:	Please answer by using a scale of zero (0) to , where zero represents “no threat whatsoever” and 10 represents “extreme threat”. [Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not threat whatsoever	30	3.7%	0.036991369
2	1	42	5.2%	0.051787916
3	2	76	9.4%	0.093711467
4	3	91	11.2%	0.112207152
5	4	69	8.5%	0.085080148
6	5	111	13.7%	0.136868064
7	6	106	13.1%	0.130702836
8	7	103	12.7%	0.127003699
9	8	87	10.7%	0.107274969
10	9	24	3.0%	0.029593095
11	10 extreme threat	26	3.2%	0.032059186
97	No answer	39	4.8%	0.048088779
98	Not asked	5486		NA
99	No answer	7	0.9%	0.008631319

r4km4e_1

Variable label:	Important for Norway to reduce climate gas emissions
Literal question:	How important do you think it is for Norway to reduce climate gas emissions?
Technical description:	Please answer by using a scale of zero (0) to , where zero represents “not at all important” and 10 represents “extremely important”. [Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 not at all important	18	2.2%	0.022194821
2	1	17	2.1%	0.020961776
3	2	26	3.2%	0.032059186
4	3	45	5.5%	0.055487053
5	4	34	4.2%	0.041923551
6	5	67	8.3%	0.082614057
7	6	58	7.2%	0.071516646
8	7	115	14.2%	0.141800247
9	8	137	16.9%	0.168927250
10	9	89	11.0%	0.109741060
11	10 extremely important	163	20.1%	0.200986436
97	No answer	38	4.7%	0.046855734
98	Not asked	5486		NA
99	No answer	4	0.5%	0.004932182

r4km4f_1

Variable label:	How much of a problem do you think climate change will be for Norway during the next 50 years?
Literal question:	How much of a problem do you think climate change will be for Norway during the next 50 years?
Technical description:	Please answer by using a scale of zero (0) to , where zero represents “absolutely no problem” and 10 represents “disastrous”. [Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 absolutely no problem	12	1.5%	0.014796547
2	1	11	1.4%	0.013563502
3	2	41	5.1%	0.050554871
4	3	65	8.0%	0.080147965
5	4	66	8.1%	0.081381011
6	5	106	13.1%	0.130702836
7	6	120	14.8%	0.147965475
8	7	178	21.9%	0.219482121
9	8	118	14.5%	0.145499383
10	9	41	5.1%	0.050554871
11	10 highly negative	13	1.6%	0.016029593
97	No answer	36	4.4%	0.044389642
98	Not asked	5486		NA
99	No answer	4	0.5%	0.004932182

r4km4g_1

Variable label:	Reaction to organization: Grønn Verden
Pre-question text:	Two organisations are mentioned in the text that you have just read. Please quantify your reaction to these organisations on a scale of zero (0) to , where zero means “highly negative” and 10 means ““highly positive”.
Literal question:	Grønn Verden
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 highly negative	27	3.3%	0.03329223
2	1	22	2.7%	0.02712700
3	2	42	5.2%	0.05178792
4	3	55	6.8%	0.06781751
5	4	59	7.3%	0.07274969
6	5	109	13.4%	0.13440197
7	6	69	8.5%	0.08508015
8	7	74	9.1%	0.09124538
9	8	44	5.4%	0.05425401
10	9	25	3.1%	0.03082614
11	10 highly positive	18	2.2%	0.02219482
97	No answer	243	30.0%	0.29963009
98	Not asked	5486		NA
99	No answer	24	3.0%	0.02959309

r4km4g_2

Variable label:	Reaction to organization: Norsk Næringsliv
Pre-question text:	Two organisations are mentioned in the text that you have just read. Please quantify your reaction to these organisations on a scale of zero (0) to , where zero means “highly negative” and 10 means ““highly positive”.
Literal question:	Norsk Næringsliv
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 highly negative	37	4.6%	0.045622688
2	1	35	4.3%	0.043156597
3	2	53	6.5%	0.065351418
4	3	66	8.1%	0.081381011
5	4	103	12.7%	0.127003699
6	5	132	16.3%	0.162762022
7	6	51	6.3%	0.062885327
8	7	41	5.1%	0.050554871
9	8	20	2.5%	0.024660912
10	9	4	0.5%	0.004932182
11	10 highly positive	6	0.7%	0.007398274
97	No answer	244	30.1%	0.300863132
98	Not asked	5486		NA
99	No answer	19	2.3%	0.023427867

r4km5_1_1

Variable label:	Statement: Everyone should have equal opportunities for succeeding or failing without the authorities becoming involved.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Everyone should have equal opportunities for succeeding or failing without the authorities becoming involved.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	48	6.0%	0.06030151
2	Agree	207	26.0%	0.26005025
3	Agree somewhat	189	23.7%	0.23743719
4	Neither agree nor disagree	172	21.6%	0.21608040
5	Disagree somewhat	91	11.4%	0.11432161
6	Disagree	59	7.4%	0.07412060
7	Strongly disagree	17	2.1%	0.02135678
97	No answer	13	1.6%	0.01633166
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km5_1_2

Variable label:	Statement: Market competition is almost always the best way of meeting people’s requirements.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Market competition is almost always the best way of meeting people’s requirements.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	23	2.9%	0.02889447
2	Agree	109	13.7%	0.13693467
3	Agree somewhat	185	23.2%	0.23241206
4	Neither agree nor disagree	159	20.0%	0.19974874
5	Disagree somewhat	152	19.1%	0.19095477
6	Disagree	111	13.9%	0.13944724
7	Strongly disagree	44	5.5%	0.05527638
97	No answer	13	1.6%	0.01633166
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km5_1_3

Variable label:	Statement: If the system is fair the cleverest people should earn the most money.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	If the system is fair the cleverest people should earn the most money.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	32	4.0%	0.04020101
2	Agree	161	20.2%	0.20226131
3	Agree somewhat	258	32.4%	0.32412060
4	Neither agree nor disagree	127	16.0%	0.15954774
5	Disagree somewhat	106	13.3%	0.13316583
6	Disagree	73	9.2%	0.09170854
7	Strongly disagree	29	3.6%	0.03643216
97	No answer	10	1.3%	0.01256281
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km5_1_4

Variable label:	Statement: The world would be more peaceful if wealth was more evenly distributed between countries
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	The world would be more peaceful if wealth was more evenly distributed between countries.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	104	13.1%	0.13065327
2	Agree	249	31.3%	0.31281407
3	Agree somewhat	203	25.5%	0.25502513
4	Neither agree nor disagree	115	14.4%	0.14447236
5	Disagree somewhat	60	7.5%	0.07537688
6	Disagree	41	5.2%	0.05150754
7	Strongly disagree	15	1.9%	0.01884422
97	No answer	9	1.1%	0.01130653
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km5_1_5

Variable label:	Statement: Society needs more justice so that wealth can be distributed more evenly.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Society needs more justice so that wealth can be distributed more evenly.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	83	10.4%	0.10427136
2	Agree	217	27.3%	0.27261307
3	Agree somewhat	224	28.1%	0.28140704
4	Neither agree nor disagree	130	16.3%	0.16331658
5	Disagree somewhat	84	10.6%	0.10552764
6	Disagree	38	4.8%	0.04773869
7	Strongly disagree	12	1.5%	0.01507538
97	No answer	8	1.0%	0.01005025
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km5_1_6

Variable label:	Statement: I support tax reforms which would make companies and people on high incomes pay more tax.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	I support tax reforms which would make companies and people on high incomes pay more tax.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	74	9.3%	0.09296482
2	Agree	200	25.1%	0.25125628
3	Agree somewhat	239	30.0%	0.30025126
4	Neither agree nor disagree	85	10.7%	0.10678392
5	Disagree somewhat	98	12.3%	0.12311558
6	Disagree	66	8.3%	0.08291457
7	Strongly disagree	23	2.9%	0.02889447
97	No answer	11	1.4%	0.01381910
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km5_2_1

Variable label:	Statement: The best way of looking after future generations is to keep our customs.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	The best way of looking after future generations is to keep our customs.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	37	4.6%	0.04648241
2	Agree	130	16.3%	0.16331658
3	Agree somewhat	258	32.4%	0.32412060
4	Neither agree nor disagree	123	15.5%	0.15452261
5	Disagree somewhat	134	16.8%	0.16834171
6	Disagree	82	10.3%	0.10301508
7	Strongly disagree	19	2.4%	0.02386935
97	No answer	13	1.6%	0.01633166
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km5_2_2

Variable label:	Statement: Society works best when people strictly obey all the laws and regulations.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Society works best when people strictly obey all the laws and regulations.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	76	9.5%	0.09547739
2	Agree	324	40.7%	0.40703518
3	Agree somewhat	241	30.3%	0.30276382
4	Neither agree nor disagree	60	7.5%	0.07537688
5	Disagree somewhat	65	8.2%	0.08165829
6	Disagree	9	1.1%	0.01130653
7	Strongly disagree	7	0.9%	0.00879397
97	No answer	14	1.8%	0.01758794
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km5_2_3

Variable label:	Statement: Having respect for authority is one of the most important things that children can learn.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Having respect for authority is one of the most important things that children can learn.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	35	4.4%	0.04396985
2	Agree	128	16.1%	0.16080402
3	Agree somewhat	267	33.5%	0.33542714
4	Neither agree nor disagree	106	13.3%	0.13316583
5	Disagree somewhat	120	15.1%	0.15075377
6	Disagree	94	11.8%	0.11809045
7	Strongly disagree	33	4.1%	0.04145729
97	No answer	13	1.6%	0.01633166
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km5_2_4

Variable label:	Statement: Cooperation with other people rarely works.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Cooperation with other people rarely works.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	3	0.4%	0.003768844
2	Agree	12	1.5%	0.015075377
3	Agree somewhat	31	3.9%	0.038944724
4	Neither agree nor disagree	37	4.6%	0.046482412
5	Disagree somewhat	111	13.9%	0.139447236
6	Disagree	376	47.2%	0.472361809
7	Strongly disagree	212	26.6%	0.266331658
97	No answer	14	1.8%	0.017587940
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km5_2_5

Variable label:	Statement: The future is too uncertain to allow us to make proper plans.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	The future is too uncertain to allow us to make proper plans.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	5	0.6%	0.006281407
2	Agree	22	2.8%	0.027638191
3	Agree somewhat	69	8.7%	0.086683417
4	Neither agree nor disagree	81	10.2%	0.101758794
5	Disagree somewhat	168	21.1%	0.211055276
6	Disagree	353	44.3%	0.443467337
7	Strongly disagree	83	10.4%	0.104271357
97	No answer	15	1.9%	0.018844221
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km5_2_6

Variable label:	Statement: I feel that life is a lottery.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	I feel that life is a lottery.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	13	1.6%	0.01633166
2	Agree	32	4.0%	0.04020101
3	Agree somewhat	126	15.8%	0.15829146
4	Neither agree nor disagree	132	16.6%	0.16582915
5	Disagree somewhat	120	15.1%	0.15075377
6	Disagree	262	32.9%	0.32914573
7	Strongly disagree	94	11.8%	0.11809045
97	No answer	17	2.1%	0.02135678
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4mobil_r4km6

Variable label:	[Tester om respondenten benytter en mobil enhet. Tester dersom U=2 og ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	Non-mobile	630	79.1%	0.791457286
1	Mobile	162	20.4%	0.203517588
97		4	0.5%	0.005025126
98		5501		NA

r4km6

Variable label:	Image experiment: Which of these images best illustrates your understanding of how the climate system works.
Literal question:	People disagree about how the climate system works. The five images below illustrate five different perspectives. Each picture portrays the earth’s climate system as being a ball balancing on a line, and each one has a different ability to withstand man-made climate changes. Which of these images best illustrates your understanding of how the climate system works.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2 & mobil_R4KM6 =0. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Respondents using mobile device are not exposed to the experiment. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Gradual - The earth's climate is changing slowly. Climate change will gradually result in dangerous consequences.	290	46.0%	0.46031746
2	Fragile - The climate on earth is delicately balanced. Small climate changes will gradually create sudden and disastrous consequences.	41	6.5%	0.06507937
3	Stable - The earth's climate is very stable. Climate change will result in minor or no consequences.	15	2.4%	0.02380952
4	Threshold - The earth's climate is stable within certain limits. If there are minor climate changes the climate will return to a stable balance. If there are major changes the consequences will be disastrous.	180	28.6%	0.28571429
5	Governed by chance - The earth's climate is governed by chance and unpredictable. We do not know what will happen.	87	13.8%	0.13809524
97	No answer	17	2.7%	0.02698413
98	Not asked	5667		NA

r4km7

Variable label:	Where would you place your views about the relationship between humans and nature on this scale?
Literal question:	Some people think that humans are at the centre of the whole organic system (nature). Others think that humans are just a small part of the organic system. These two views have been placed at either extreme of the scale below. Where would you place your views about the relationship between humans and nature on this scale?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Humans are at the centre of the organic system	83	5.2%	0.05161692
2	2	149	9.3%	0.09266169
3	3	291	18.1%	0.18097015
4	4	363	22.6%	0.22574627
5	5	322	20.0%	0.20024876
6	6	170	10.6%	0.10572139
7	7 Humans are a small part of the organic system	195	12.1%	0.12126866
97	No answer	35	2.2%	0.02176617
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4km8_1

Variable label:	Statement: Humans are entitled to change their natural environment in order to satisfy their requirements .
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Humans are entitled to change their natural environment in order to satisfy their requirements .
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	27	1.7%	0.01679104
2	Agree	54	3.4%	0.03358209
3	Agree somewhat	202	12.6%	0.12562189
4	Neither agree nor disagree	142	8.8%	0.08830846
5	Disagree somewhat	329	20.5%	0.20460199
6	Disagree	527	32.8%	0.32773632
7	Strongly disagree	295	18.3%	0.18345771
97	No answer	32	2.0%	0.01990050
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4km8_2

Variable label:	Statement: The so-called organic crisis” facing humanity has been highly exaggerated.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	The so-called organic crisis” facing humanity has been highly exaggerated.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	31	1.9%	0.01927861
2	Agree	84	5.2%	0.05223881
3	Agree somewhat	284	17.7%	0.17661692
4	Neither agree nor disagree	201	12.5%	0.12500000
5	Disagree somewhat	284	17.7%	0.17661692
6	Disagree	471	29.3%	0.29291045
7	Strongly disagree	219	13.6%	0.13619403
97	No answer	34	2.1%	0.02114428
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4km8_3

Variable label:	Statement: The balance of nature is extremely sensitive and easy to disturb.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	The balance of nature is extremely sensitive and easy to disturb.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	200	12.4%	0.12437811
2	Agree	509	31.7%	0.31654229
3	Agree somewhat	471	29.3%	0.29291045
4	Neither agree nor disagree	174	10.8%	0.10820896
5	Disagree somewhat	139	8.6%	0.08644279
6	Disagree	63	3.9%	0.03917910
7	Strongly disagree	21	1.3%	0.01305970
97	No answer	31	1.9%	0.01927861
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4km8_4

Variable label:	Statement: Norway needs economic growth in order to be able to protect the environment
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Norway needs economic growth in order to be able to protect the environment
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	31	1.9%	0.01927861
2	Agree	140	8.7%	0.08706468
3	Agree somewhat	273	17.0%	0.16977612
4	Neither agree nor disagree	459	28.5%	0.28544776
5	Disagree somewhat	260	16.2%	0.16169154
6	Disagree	307	19.1%	0.19092040
7	Strongly disagree	99	6.2%	0.06156716
97	No answer	39	2.4%	0.02425373
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4km9_1

Variable label:	Trust: Climate researchers
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
Literal question:	Climate researchers
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	148	18.6%	0.18592965
2	To a great degree	352	44.2%	0.44221106
3	To some degree	220	27.6%	0.27638191
4	To a small degree	40	5.0%	0.05025126
5	Not at all	14	1.8%	0.01758794
97	No answer	22	2.8%	0.02763819
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km9_2

Variable label:	Trust: Journalists
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
Literal question:	Journalists
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	3	0.4%	0.003768844
2	To a great degree	38	4.8%	0.047738693
3	To some degree	246	30.9%	0.309045226
4	To a small degree	323	40.6%	0.405778894
5	Not at all	161	20.2%	0.202261307
97	No answer	25	3.1%	0.031407035
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km9_3

Variable label:	Trust: Social debaters
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
Literal question:	Social debaters
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	4	0.5%	0.005025126
2	To a great degree	29	3.6%	0.036432161
3	To some degree	376	47.2%	0.472361809
4	To a small degree	281	35.3%	0.353015075
5	Not at all	73	9.2%	0.091708543
97	No answer	33	4.1%	0.041457286
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km9_4

Variable label:	Trust: Environmentalists
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
Literal question:	Environmentalists
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	25	3.1%	0.03140704
2	To a great degree	161	20.2%	0.20226131
3	To some degree	372	46.7%	0.46733668
4	To a small degree	146	18.3%	0.18341709
5	Not at all	65	8.2%	0.08165829
97	No answer	27	3.4%	0.03391960
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km9_5

Variable label:	Trust: Politicians
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
Literal question:	Politicians
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	2	0.3%	0.002512563
2	To a great degree	20	2.5%	0.025125628
3	To some degree	300	37.7%	0.376884422
4	To a small degree	330	41.5%	0.414572864
5	Not at all	114	14.3%	0.143216080
97	No answer	30	3.8%	0.037688442
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km9_6

Variable label:	Trust: Friends and family
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
Literal question:	Friends and family
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	9	1.1%	0.01130653
2	To a great degree	57	7.2%	0.07160804
3	To some degree	397	49.9%	0.49874372
4	To a small degree	224	28.1%	0.28140704
5	Not at all	75	9.4%	0.09422111
97	No answer	34	4.3%	0.04271357
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km9_7

Variable label:	Trust: Others, please specify who
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
Literal question:	Others, please specify who
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great degree	9	1.1%	0.01130653
2	To a great degree	27	3.4%	0.03391960
3	To some degree	113	14.2%	0.14195980
4	To a small degree	47	5.9%	0.05904523
5	Not at all	65	8.2%	0.08165829
97	No answer	535	67.2%	0.67211055
98	Not asked	5501		NA

r4km9_7_other

Variable label:	Trust: Others, please specify who [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
Literal question:	Others, please specify who
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4km12

Variable label:	What do you think should be done about climate change? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What do you think should be done about climate change?
Technical description:	Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers, a couple of sentences would be nice, or just a few words if that is better for you. [Asked if U=2] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4ran22

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1586] [Invalid:4711] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	415	26.2%	0.2616646
2	2	392	24.7%	0.2471627
3	3	351	22.1%	0.2213115
4	4	428	27.0%	0.2698613
Sysmiss		4711		NA

r4km13a_1

Variable label:	Positive towards: Tighten up the regulations governing permitted industrial CO2 emissions, quotas
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Tighten up the regulations governing permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe by cutting the total number of quotas available to industry
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	5	1.2%	0.01204819
2	Negative	21	5.1%	0.05060241
3	Somewhat negative	24	5.8%	0.05783133
4	Neither positive nor negative	70	16.9%	0.16867470
5	Somewhat positive	121	29.2%	0.29156627
6	Positive	116	28.0%	0.27951807
7	Very positive	49	11.8%	0.11807229
97	No answer	9	2.2%	0.02168675
98	Not asked	5882		NA

r4km13a_2

Variable label:	Positive towards: Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	18	4.3%	0.04337349
2	Negative	28	6.7%	0.06746988
3	Somewhat negative	30	7.2%	0.07228916
4	Neither positive nor negative	159	38.3%	0.38313253
5	Somewhat positive	91	21.9%	0.21927711
6	Positive	54	13.0%	0.13012048
7	Very positive	24	5.8%	0.05783133
97	No answer	11	2.7%	0.02650602
98	Not asked	5882		NA

r4km13a_3

Variable label:	Positive towards: Tighten up the fiscal regulations which apply to oil exploration
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Tighten up the fiscal regulations which apply to oil exploration on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	16	3.9%	0.03855422
2	Negative	46	11.1%	0.11084337
3	Somewhat negative	47	11.3%	0.11325301
4	Neither positive nor negative	123	29.6%	0.29638554
5	Somewhat positive	85	20.5%	0.20481928
6	Positive	61	14.7%	0.14698795
7	Very positive	30	7.2%	0.07228916
97	No answer	7	1.7%	0.01686747
98	Not asked	5882		NA

r4km13a_4

Variable label:	Positive towards: Increase funding for research on, and the development of, renewable energy
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Increase funding for research on, and the development of, renewable energy
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	2	0.5%	0.004819277
2	Negative	0	0.0%	0.000000000
3	Somewhat negative	3	0.7%	0.007228916
4	Neither positive nor negative	20	4.8%	0.048192771
5	Somewhat positive	56	13.5%	0.134939759
6	Positive	159	38.3%	0.383132530
7	Very positive	169	40.7%	0.407228916
97	No answer	6	1.4%	0.014457831
98	Not asked	5882		NA

r4km13b_1

Variable label:	Positive towards: Tighten up the regulations governing permitted industrial CO2 emissions
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Tighten up the regulations governing permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe by cutting the total number of quotas available to industry
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	4	1.0%	0.01020408
2	Negative	15	3.8%	0.03826531
3	Somewhat negative	24	6.1%	0.06122449
4	Neither positive nor negative	66	16.8%	0.16836735
5	Somewhat positive	102	26.0%	0.26020408
6	Positive	140	35.7%	0.35714286
7	Very positive	32	8.2%	0.08163265
97	No answer	9	2.3%	0.02295918
98	Not asked	5905		NA

r4km13b_2

Variable label:	Positive towards: Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	9	2.3%	0.02295918
2	Negative	29	7.4%	0.07397959
3	Somewhat negative	27	6.9%	0.06887755
4	Neither positive nor negative	138	35.2%	0.35204082
5	Somewhat positive	99	25.3%	0.25255102
6	Positive	66	16.8%	0.16836735
7	Very positive	14	3.6%	0.03571429
97	No answer	10	2.6%	0.02551020
98	Not asked	5905		NA

r4km13b_3

Variable label:	Positive towards: Reduce the tax benefits which apply to oil exploration
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Reduce the tax benefits which apply to oil exploration on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	15	3.8%	0.03826531
2	Negative	36	9.2%	0.09183673
3	Somewhat negative	49	12.5%	0.12500000
4	Neither positive nor negative	123	31.4%	0.31377551
5	Somewhat positive	81	20.7%	0.20663265
6	Positive	48	12.2%	0.12244898
7	Very positive	30	7.7%	0.07653061
97	No answer	10	2.6%	0.02551020
98	Not asked	5905		NA

r4km13b_4

Variable label:	Positive towards: Increase funding for research on, and the development of renewable energy
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Increase funding for research on, and the development of renewable energy
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	2	0.5%	0.005102041
2	Negative	3	0.8%	0.007653061
3	Somewhat negative	2	0.5%	0.005102041
4	Neither positive nor negative	18	4.6%	0.045918367
5	Somewhat positive	46	11.7%	0.117346939
6	Positive	153	39.0%	0.390306122
7	Very positive	161	41.1%	0.410714286
97	No answer	7	1.8%	0.017857143
98	Not asked	5905		NA

r4km13c_1

Variable label:	Positive towards: Tighten up the regulations governing total permitted industrial CO2
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Tighten up the regulations governing total permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	2	0.6%	0.005698006
2	Negative	7	2.0%	0.019943020
3	Somewhat negative	15	4.3%	0.042735043
4	Neither positive nor negative	38	10.8%	0.108262108
5	Somewhat positive	106	30.2%	0.301994302
6	Positive	133	37.9%	0.378917379
7	Very positive	43	12.3%	0.122507123
97	No answer	7	2.0%	0.019943020
98	Not asked	5946		NA

r4km13c_2

Variable label:	Positive towards: Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	9	2.6%	0.02564103
2	Negative	28	8.0%	0.07977208
3	Somewhat negative	34	9.7%	0.09686610
4	Neither positive nor negative	127	36.2%	0.36182336
5	Somewhat positive	70	19.9%	0.19943020
6	Positive	53	15.1%	0.15099715
7	Very positive	16	4.6%	0.04558405
97	No answer	14	4.0%	0.03988604
98	Not asked	5946		NA

r4km13c_3

Variable label:	Positive towards: Tighten up the fiscal regulations which apply to oil exploration
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Tighten up the fiscal regulations which apply to oil exploration on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	12	3.4%	0.03418803
2	Negative	31	8.8%	0.08831909
3	Somewhat negative	48	13.7%	0.13675214
4	Neither positive nor negative	122	34.8%	0.34757835
5	Somewhat positive	66	18.8%	0.18803419
6	Positive	42	12.0%	0.11965812
7	Very positive	17	4.8%	0.04843305
97	No answer	13	3.7%	0.03703704
98	Not asked	5946		NA

r4km13c_4

Variable label:	Positive towards: Increase funding for research on, and the development of renewable energy
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Increase funding for research on, and the development of renewable energy
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	2	0.6%	0.005698006
2	Negative	3	0.9%	0.008547009
3	Somewhat negative	3	0.9%	0.008547009
4	Neither positive nor negative	15	4.3%	0.042735043
5	Somewhat positive	33	9.4%	0.094017094
6	Positive	136	38.7%	0.387464387
7	Very positive	152	43.3%	0.433048433
97	No answer	7	2.0%	0.019943020
98	Not asked	5946		NA

r4km13d_1

Variable label:	Positive towards: Tighten up the regulations governing total permitted industrial CO2, total emissions
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Tighten up the regulations governing total permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	7	1.6%	0.01635514
2	Negative	9	2.1%	0.02102804
3	Somewhat negative	21	4.9%	0.04906542
4	Neither positive nor negative	47	11.0%	0.10981308
5	Somewhat positive	119	27.8%	0.27803738
6	Positive	146	34.1%	0.34112150
7	Very positive	68	15.9%	0.15887850
97	No answer	11	2.6%	0.02570093
98	Not asked	5869		NA

r4km13d_2

Variable label:	Positive towards: Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	15	3.5%	0.03504673
2	Negative	24	5.6%	0.05607477
3	Somewhat negative	43	10.0%	0.10046729
4	Neither positive nor negative	179	41.8%	0.41822430
5	Somewhat positive	83	19.4%	0.19392523
6	Positive	51	11.9%	0.11915888
7	Very positive	18	4.2%	0.04205607
97	No answer	15	3.5%	0.03504673
98	Not asked	5869		NA

r4km13d_3

Variable label:	Positive towards: Reduce the tax benefits which apply to oil exploration
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Reduce the tax benefits which apply to oil exploration on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	17	4.0%	0.03971963
2	Negative	34	7.9%	0.07943925
3	Somewhat negative	46	10.7%	0.10747664
4	Neither positive nor negative	152	35.5%	0.35514019
5	Somewhat positive	86	20.1%	0.20093458
6	Positive	51	11.9%	0.11915888
7	Very positive	29	6.8%	0.06775701
97	No answer	13	3.0%	0.03037383
98	Not asked	5869		NA

r4km13d_4

Variable label:	Positive towards: Increase funding for research on, and the development of renewable energy
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
Literal question:	Increase funding for research on, and the development of renewable energy
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran22=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very negative	3	0.7%	0.007009346
2	Negative	2	0.5%	0.004672897
3	Somewhat negative	2	0.5%	0.004672897
4	Neither positive nor negative	16	3.7%	0.037383178
5	Somewhat positive	59	13.8%	0.137850467
6	Positive	153	35.7%	0.357476636
7	Very positive	184	43.0%	0.429906542
97	No answer	9	2.1%	0.021028037
98	Not asked	5869		NA

r4ran5

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1578] [Invalid:4719] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	520	33.0%	0.3295311
2	2	554	35.1%	0.3510773
3	3	504	31.9%	0.3193916
Sysmiss		4719		NA

r4km14a

Variable label:	For or against climate agreement
Literal question:	You may well be aware that statesmen from all over the world will be meeting in Paris in November 2015 in order to negotiate a new international agreement designed to restrict climate gas emissions. Suppose that these statesmen propose an agreement under which Norway would undertake a commitment to make substantial reductions in its climate gas emissions. Would you support or oppose Norway signing such an agreement?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran5=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly in favour	113	21.7%	0.217307692
2	In favour	198	38.1%	0.380769231
3	Slightly in favour	68	13.1%	0.130769231
4	Neither for nor against	69	13.3%	0.132692308
5	Slightly against	34	6.5%	0.065384615
6	Against	23	4.4%	0.044230769
7	Strongly against	11	2.1%	0.021153846
97	No answer	4	0.8%	0.007692308
98	Not asked	5777		NA

r4km14b

Variable label:	For or against climate agreement, China is in
Literal question:	You may well be aware that statesmen from all over the world will be meeting in Paris in November 2015 in order to negotiate a new international agreement designed to restrict climate gas emissions. Suppose that these statesmen propose an agreement under which Norway would undertake a commitment to make substantial reductions in its climate gas emissions. Furthermore, China also undertakes a similar commitment to reduce its climate gas emissions. Would you support or oppose Norway signing such an agreement?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran5=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly in favour	171	30.9%	0.308664260
2	In favour	224	40.4%	0.404332130
3	Slightly in favour	78	14.1%	0.140794224
4	Neither for nor against	41	7.4%	0.074007220
5	Slightly against	20	3.6%	0.036101083
6	Against	9	1.6%	0.016245487
7	Strongly against	7	1.3%	0.012635379
97	No answer	4	0.7%	0.007220217
98	Not asked	5743		NA

r4km14c

Variable label:	For or against climate agreement, China is not in
Literal question:	You may well be aware that statesmen from all over the world will be meeting in Paris in November 2015 in order to negotiate a new international agreement designed to restrict climate gas emissions. Suppose that these statesmen propose an agreement under which Norway would undertake a commitment to make substantial reductions in its climate gas emissions. However, China does not undertake a similar commitment to reduce its climate gas emissions. Would you support or oppose Norway signing such an agreement?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran5=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly in favour	58	11.5%	0.11507937
2	In favour	143	28.4%	0.28373016
3	Slightly in favour	73	14.5%	0.14484127
4	Neither for nor against	58	11.5%	0.11507937
5	Slightly against	54	10.7%	0.10714286
6	Against	64	12.7%	0.12698413
7	Strongly against	47	9.3%	0.09325397
97	No answer	7	1.4%	0.01388889
98	Not asked	5793		NA

r4km15

Variable label:	Does the Progress Party support measures that increase the cost of emitting greenhouse gases in Norway?
Literal question:	In your opinion, does the Progress Party support measures that increase the cost of emitting greenhouse gases in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	353	22.0%	0.2195274
2	No	1090	67.8%	0.6778607
97	No answer	165	10.3%	0.1026119
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4oc1

Variable label:	Should Norway play an active or reduced role in international politics?
Literal question:	Do you think it is best for Norway in the future to play an active role in international politics, or should Norway preferably have a reduced role?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Active role in international politics	1141	73.7%	0.73708010
2	Non-active role in international politics	386	24.9%	0.24935401
97	No answer	21	1.4%	0.01356589
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4oc25

Variable label:	Statement: Local news more interesting than national or international news
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements “I often feel that the news about what is taking place in my local area is more interesting than national and international news items.”
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	47	3.0%	0.030361757
2	Agree	201	13.0%	0.129844961
3	Agree somewhat	341	22.0%	0.220284238
4	Neither agree nor disagree	290	18.7%	0.187338501
5	Disagree somewhat	238	15.4%	0.153746770
6	Disagree	321	20.7%	0.207364341
7	Strongly disagree	106	6.8%	0.068475452
97	No answer	4	0.3%	0.002583979
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad1

Variable label:	Attitude towards advertising on bus stops
Literal question:	We will now be asking a variety of questions about politics, public services and the media. Several Norwegian municipalities have in recent years entered into contracts with companies that provide and maintain bus shelters, city bicycles and public lavatories in return for the companies being allowed to advertise in connection with these. What is your opinion of this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and if the respondent is inhabitant in a defined group of municipalities. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	I am opposed to municipal funding of bus shelters, city bicycles and public lavatories with the aid of advertising	221	28.9%	0.28888889
2	I support municipal funding of bus shelters, city bicycles and public lavatories with the aid of advertising	531	69.4%	0.69411765
97	No answer	13	1.7%	0.01699346
98	Not asked	5532		NA

r4pad10_1

Variable label:	Proposal: The authorities propose merging the municipality in which you reside with one or more neighbouring municipalities
Pre-question text:	What is your opinion about the following two proposals?
Literal question:	The authorities propose merging the municipality in which you reside with one or more neighbouring municipalities
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good suggestion	182	11.8%	0.11757106
2	Good suggestion	380	24.5%	0.24547804
3	Fairly good suggestion	301	19.4%	0.19444444
4	Neither good nor bad suggestion	247	16.0%	0.15956072
5	Not very good suggestion	147	9.5%	0.09496124
6	Bad suggestion	153	9.9%	0.09883721
7	Very bad suggestion	117	7.6%	0.07558140
97	No answer	21	1.4%	0.01356589
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad10_2

Variable label:	Proposal: Your municipality proposes providing more municipal services in cooperation with one or more neighbouring municipalities than it does at the moment.
Pre-question text:	What is your opinion about the following two proposals?
Literal question:	Your municipality proposes providing more municipal services in cooperation with one or more neighbouring municipalities than it does at the moment.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good suggestion	189	12.2%	0.12209302
2	Good suggestion	464	30.0%	0.29974160
3	Fairly good suggestion	379	24.5%	0.24483204
4	Neither good nor bad suggestion	228	14.7%	0.14728682
5	Not very good suggestion	126	8.1%	0.08139535
6	Bad suggestion	83	5.4%	0.05361757
7	Very bad suggestion	50	3.2%	0.03229974
97	No answer	29	1.9%	0.01873385
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad11

Variable label:	Willing to pay more in taxes to retain current municipal structure
Literal question:	Some estimates suggest that the current municipal structure is costing society more. If you could choose, would you be willing to pay an extra NOK 1,000 in tax per year to maintain the current municipal structure?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	337	21.8%	0.217700258
2	No	824	53.2%	0.532299742
3	Don't know	375	24.2%	0.242248062
97	Ikke svart	12	0.8%	0.007751938
98	Ikke spurt	4749		NA

r4pad12_1

Variable label:	Statement: Inter-municipal cooperation produces better services
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following two statements?
Literal question:	Cooperation between the municipalities on the supply of services (inter-municipal cooperation) gives better quality than if individual municipalities supply the services themselves.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Totally agree	161	10.4%	0.10400517
2	Agree	395	25.5%	0.25516796
3	Agree somewhat	447	28.9%	0.28875969
4	Neither agree nor disagree	338	21.8%	0.21834625
5	Disagree somewhat	98	6.3%	0.06330749
6	Disagree	71	4.6%	0.04586563
7	Totally disagree	21	1.4%	0.01356589
97	No answer	17	1.1%	0.01098191
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad12_2

Variable label:	Statement: Inter-municipal cooperation makes it harder for voters to know who is responsible
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following two statements?
Literal question:	Inter-municipal cooperation makes it harder for voters to know who is responsible for the contents of the policies that are implemented
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Totally agree	75	4.8%	0.04844961
2	Agree	221	14.3%	0.14276486
3	Agree somewhat	427	27.6%	0.27583979
4	Neither agree nor disagree	383	24.7%	0.24741602
5	Disagree somewhat	184	11.9%	0.11886305
6	Disagree	181	11.7%	0.11692506
7	Totally disagree	52	3.4%	0.03359173
97	No answer	25	1.6%	0.01614987
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad13

Variable label:	What do you think results in the best services for you and your municipality?
Literal question:	What do you think results in the best services for you and your municipality?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	That my municipality provides the services itself	302	19.5%	0.195090439
2	That my municipality cooperates more with other municipalities	623	40.2%	0.402454780
3	That my municipality merges with other municipalities	406	26.2%	0.262273902
4	Don't know	205	13.2%	0.132428941
97	No answer	12	0.8%	0.007751938
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad14_1

Variable label:	Like or dislike party leaders: Erna Solberg (Cons.)
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you like or dislike the following party leaders?
Literal question:	Erna Solberg (Cons.)
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly dislike	82	5.3%	0.05297158
2	Significantly dislike	129	8.3%	0.08333333
3	Somewhat dislike	243	15.7%	0.15697674
4	Neither dislike nor like	263	17.0%	0.16989664
5	Somewhat like	410	26.5%	0.26485788
6	Significantly like	314	20.3%	0.20284238
7	Strongly like	85	5.5%	0.05490956
97	No answer	22	1.4%	0.01421189
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad14_2

Variable label:	Like or dislike party leaders: Jonas Gahr Støre (Lab.)
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you like or dislike the following party leaders?
Literal question:	Jonas Gahr Støre (Lab.)
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly dislike	42	2.7%	0.02713178
2	Significantly dislike	66	4.3%	0.04263566
3	Somewhat dislike	144	9.3%	0.09302326
4	Neither dislike nor like	282	18.2%	0.18217054
5	Somewhat like	399	25.8%	0.25775194
6	Significantly like	416	26.9%	0.26873385
7	Strongly like	173	11.2%	0.11175711
97	No answer	26	1.7%	0.01679587
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad14_3

Variable label:	Like or dislike party leaders: Siv Jensen (Progress Party)
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you like or dislike the following party leaders?
Literal question:	Siv Jensen (Progress Party)
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly dislike	383	24.7%	0.24741602
2	Significantly dislike	261	16.9%	0.16860465
3	Somewhat dislike	298	19.3%	0.19250646
4	Neither dislike nor like	230	14.9%	0.14857881
5	Somewhat like	221	14.3%	0.14276486
6	Significantly like	94	6.1%	0.06072351
7	Strongly like	36	2.3%	0.02325581
97	No answer	25	1.6%	0.01614987
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad15

Variable label:	Local election in the fall, tight race?
Literal question:	As regards the local government elections this autumn, to what extent do you think that there will be close competition between the parties standing for election in respect of who will be elected to the Municipal Council where you live?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Extremely close competition	93	6.0%	0.06007752
2	Very close competition	457	29.5%	0.29521964
3	Some competition	558	36.0%	0.36046512
4	Not much competition	166	10.7%	0.10723514
5	No competition at all	27	1.7%	0.01744186
6	Don't know	231	14.9%	0.14922481
97	No answer	16	1.0%	0.01033592
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad155_1

Variable label:	Local election in the fall, chosen a party yet?
Literal question:	Some people have very definite ideas about which party they will vote for during the local government elections in the autumn. Others have not made a decision yet. To what extent are you sure about which party you will end up voting for?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-99]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0 - I am very sure	405	26.2%	0.26162791
1	1	119	7.7%	0.07687339
2	2	157	10.1%	0.10142119
3	3	114	7.4%	0.07364341
4	4	77	5.0%	0.04974160
5	5	89	5.7%	0.05749354
6	6	68	4.4%	0.04392765
7	7	104	6.7%	0.06718346
8	8	120	7.8%	0.07751938
9	9	61	3.9%	0.03940568
10	10 - I am very unsure	127	8.2%	0.08204134
97	No answer	81	5.2%	0.05232558
98	Not asked	4749		NA
99	No answer	26	1.7%	0.01679587

r4ran7

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1542] [Invalid:4755] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	307	19.9%	0.1990921
2	2	312	20.2%	0.2023346
3	3	315	20.4%	0.2042802
4	4	308	20.0%	0.1997406
5	5	300	19.5%	0.1945525
Sysmiss		4755		NA

r4pad16a

Variable label:	Article about NAV: Postitive or negative impression?
Literal question:	This example show the introduction to a hypothetical article about NAV (the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration) in the Norwegian newspapers. How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran7=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very positive	10	3.3%	0.032573290
2	Positive	51	16.6%	0.166123779
3	Somewhat positive	61	19.9%	0.198697068
4	Neither positive nor negative	81	26.4%	0.263843648
5	Somewhat negative	59	19.2%	0.192182410
6	Negative	31	10.1%	0.100977199
7	Very negative	11	3.6%	0.035830619
97	No answer	3	1.0%	0.009771987
98	Not asked	5990		NA

r4pad16b

Variable label:	Article about NAV: Postitive or negative impression?
Literal question:	This example show the introduction to a hypothetical article about NAV (the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration) in the Norwegian newspapers. How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran7=2. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very positive	4	1.3%	0.01282051
2	Positive	45	14.4%	0.14423077
3	Somewhat positive	48	15.4%	0.15384615
4	Neither positive nor negative	66	21.2%	0.21153846
5	Somewhat negative	76	24.4%	0.24358974
6	Negative	48	15.4%	0.15384615
7	Very negative	21	6.7%	0.06730769
97	No answer	4	1.3%	0.01282051
98	Not asked	5985		NA

r4pad16c

Variable label:	Article about NAV: Postitive or negative impression?
Literal question:	This example show the introduction to a hypothetical article about NAV (the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration) in the Norwegian newspapers. How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran7=3. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very positive	5	1.6%	0.015873016
2	Positive	34	10.8%	0.107936508
3	Somewhat positive	35	11.1%	0.111111111
4	Neither positive nor negative	50	15.9%	0.158730159
5	Somewhat negative	101	32.1%	0.320634921
6	Negative	52	16.5%	0.165079365
7	Very negative	36	11.4%	0.114285714
97	No answer	2	0.6%	0.006349206
98	Not asked	5982		NA

r4pad16d

Variable label:	Article about NAV: Postitive or negative impression?
Literal question:	This example show the introduction to a hypothetical article about NAV (the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration) in the Norwegian newspapers. How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran7=4. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very positive	24	7.8%	0.077922078
2	Positive	67	21.8%	0.217532468
3	Somewhat positive	58	18.8%	0.188311688
4	Neither positive nor negative	53	17.2%	0.172077922
5	Somewhat negative	64	20.8%	0.207792208
6	Negative	27	8.8%	0.087662338
7	Very negative	14	4.5%	0.045454545
97	No answer	1	0.3%	0.003246753
98	Not asked	5989		NA

r4pad16e

Variable label:	Postitive or negative impression of NAV?
Literal question:	How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran7=5. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very positive	6	2.0%	0.020000000
2	Positive	34	11.3%	0.113333333
3	Somewhat positive	56	18.7%	0.186666667
4	Neither positive nor negative	51	17.0%	0.170000000
5	Somewhat negative	89	29.7%	0.296666667
6	Negative	38	12.7%	0.126666667
7	Very negative	24	8.0%	0.080000000
97	No answer	2	0.7%	0.006666667
98	Not asked	5997		NA

r4pad17

Variable label:	Use more or less money on NAV
Literal question:	Do you think that the government should spend more or less money on running NAV during the forthcoming years?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Much more money	126	8.1%	0.08139535
2	A bit more money	413	26.7%	0.26679587
3	Neither more nor less money	722	46.6%	0.46640827
4	A bit less money	179	11.6%	0.11563307
5	A lot less money	75	4.8%	0.04844961
97	No answer	33	2.1%	0.02131783
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad18_1

Variable label:	NAV in the media, what effects: you opinion of NAV?
Pre-question text:	When the media report on NAV, they often write about either how individuals experience meeting NAV (so-called “individual cases”) or about the more general aspects of NAV, where they focus on wider contexts and often refer to statistics (so-called “context cases”). Which of these two types of news do you think has the greatest impact on…
Literal question:	… your views about NAV?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Individual cases are the only types of news which affect my views about NAV	48	3.1%	0.03100775
2	Individual cases affect my views about NAV more than context cases	277	17.9%	0.17894057
3	Both affect my views in equal measure	742	47.9%	0.47932817
4	Context cases affect my views about NAV more than individual cases	384	24.8%	0.24806202
5	Context cases are the only types of news which affect my views about NAV	43	2.8%	0.02777778
97	No answer	54	3.5%	0.03488372
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad18_2

Variable label:	NAV in the media, what effects: Norwegians opinion of NAV?
Pre-question text:	When the media report on NAV, they often write about either how individuals experience meeting NAV (so-called “individual cases”) or about the more general aspects of NAV, where they focus on wider contexts and often refer to statistics (so-called “context cases”). Which of these two types of news do you think has the greatest impact on…
Literal question:	… other Norwegians’ views about NAV?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Individual cases are the only types of news which affect my views about NAV	144	9.3%	0.09302326
2	Individual cases affect my views about NAV more than context cases	542	35.0%	0.35012920
3	Both affect my views in equal measure	596	38.5%	0.38501292
4	Context cases affect my views about NAV more than individual cases	106	6.8%	0.06847545
5	Context cases are the only types of news which affect my views about NAV	24	1.6%	0.01550388
97	No answer	136	8.8%	0.08785530
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4pad19

Variable label:	Have you personally been in contact with NAV?
Literal question:	Have you personally been in contact with NAV?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes, as a user of NAV's services	634	41.0%	0.409560724
2	Yes, as a NAV employee	15	1.0%	0.009689922
3	Yes, both as an employee and a user of NAV's services	25	1.6%	0.016149871
4	Yes, but in other ways	338	21.8%	0.218346253
5	No	520	33.6%	0.335917313
97	No answer	16	1.0%	0.010335917
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4ran8

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1539] [Invalid:4758] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	255	16.6%	0.1656920
2	2	250	16.2%	0.1624431
3	3	252	16.4%	0.1637427
4	4	268	17.4%	0.1741391
5	5	251	16.3%	0.1630929
6	6	263	17.1%	0.1708902
Sysmiss		4758		NA

r4pad20a

Variable label:	Article in online newspaper: News or advertisement?
Literal question:	This example shows the introduction to a hypothetical article which could appear in online Norwegian papers. Based on the information provided in this case do you consider this to be a typical example of a news article (written by a journalist) or a typical example of an advertisement (written by an advertiser)?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran8=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	This is a typical news article	57	22.4%	0.22352941
2	Looks more like a news article	71	27.8%	0.27843137
3	This is just as much a new article as it is an advertisement	69	27.1%	0.27058824
4	Looks more like an advertisement	40	15.7%	0.15686275
5	This is a typical advertisement	12	4.7%	0.04705882
97	No answer	6	2.4%	0.02352941
98	Not asked	6042		NA

r4pad20b

Variable label:	Article in online newspaper: News or advertisement?
Literal question:	This example shows the introduction to a hypothetical article which could appear in online Norwegian papers. Based on the information provided in this case do you consider this to be a typical example of a news article (written by a journalist) or a typical example of an advertisement (written by an advertiser)?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran8=2. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	This is a typical news article	27	10.8%	0.108
2	Looks more like a news article	46	18.4%	0.184
3	This is just as much a new article as it is an advertisement	61	24.4%	0.244
4	Looks more like an advertisement	74	29.6%	0.296
5	This is a typical advertisement	37	14.8%	0.148
97	No answer	5	2.0%	0.020
98	Not asked	6047		NA

r4pad20c

Variable label:	Article in online newspaper: News or advertisement?
Literal question:	This example shows the introduction to a hypothetical article which could appear in online Norwegian papers. Based on the information provided in this case do you consider this to be a typical example of a news article (written by a journalist) or a typical example of an advertisement (written by an advertiser)?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran8=3. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	This is a typical news article	34	13.5%	0.13492063
2	Looks more like a news article	35	13.9%	0.13888889
3	This is just as much a new article as it is an advertisement	62	24.6%	0.24603175
4	Looks more like an advertisement	72	28.6%	0.28571429
5	This is a typical advertisement	44	17.5%	0.17460317
97	No answer	5	2.0%	0.01984127
98	Not asked	6045		NA

r4pad20d

Variable label:	Article in online newspaper: News or advertisement?
Literal question:	This example shows the introduction to a hypothetical article which could appear in online Norwegian papers. Based on the information provided in this case do you consider this to be a typical example of a news article (written by a journalist) or a typical example of an advertisement (written by an advertiser)?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran8=4. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	This is a typical news article	35	13.1%	0.13059701
2	Looks more like a news article	103	38.4%	0.38432836
3	This is just as much a new article as it is an advertisement	64	23.9%	0.23880597
4	Looks more like an advertisement	48	17.9%	0.17910448
5	This is a typical advertisement	10	3.7%	0.03731343
97	No answer	8	3.0%	0.02985075
98	Not asked	6029		NA

r4pad20e

Variable label:	Article in online newspaper: News or advertisement?
Literal question:	This example shows the introduction to a hypothetical article which could appear in online Norwegian papers. Based on the information provided in this case do you consider this to be a typical example of a news article (written by a journalist) or a typical example of an advertisement (written by an advertiser)?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran8=5. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	This is a typical news article	23	9.2%	0.091633466
2	Looks more like a news article	59	23.5%	0.235059761
3	This is just as much a new article as it is an advertisement	70	27.9%	0.278884462
4	Looks more like an advertisement	73	29.1%	0.290836653
5	This is a typical advertisement	25	10.0%	0.099601594
97	No answer	1	0.4%	0.003984064
98	Not asked	6046		NA

r4pad20f

Variable label:	Article in online newspaper: News or advertisement?
Literal question:	This example shows the introduction to a hypothetical article which could appear in online Norwegian papers. Based on the information provided in this case do you consider this to be a typical example of a news article (written by a journalist) or a typical example of an advertisement (written by an advertiser)?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran8=6. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	This is a typical news article	16	6.1%	0.06083650
2	Looks more like a news article	59	22.4%	0.22433460
3	This is just as much a new article as it is an advertisement	75	28.5%	0.28517110
4	Looks more like an advertisement	65	24.7%	0.24714829
5	This is a typical advertisement	45	17.1%	0.17110266
97	No answer	3	1.1%	0.01140684
98	Not asked	6034		NA

r4pad21

Variable label:	Article in online newspaper: Confidence in information
Literal question:	This is also an example which shows the introduction to a hypothetical case which could appear in online Norwegian papers. How much confidence do you have in the information provided in cases of this type?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high confidence	24	1.6%	0.01550388
2	High confidence	237	15.3%	0.15310078
3	Some confidence	794	51.3%	0.51291990
4	Low confidence	398	25.7%	0.25710594
5	Not much confidence	60	3.9%	0.03875969
97	No answer	35	2.3%	0.02260982
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r4ran9

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1536] [Invalid:4761] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	550	35.8%	0.3580729
2	2	500	32.6%	0.3255208
3	3	486	31.6%	0.3164062
Sysmiss		4761		NA

r4pad22

Variable label:	Prize, 1000 NOK or 1800 NOK
Literal question:	As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you are being included in a draw for an extra monetary prize. If you win you can choose to receive NOK 1,000 or NOK 1,800. Which would you choose?
Technical description:	Please tick one of the options. [Asked if U=3 and ran9<3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes please, I would like to receive NOK 1,000	230	21.9%	0.21904762
2	Yes please, I would like to receive NOK 1,800	789	75.1%	0.75142857
97	No answer	31	3.0%	0.02952381
98	Not asked	5247		NA

r4pad23a

Variable label:	Text: Chose 1000 NOK over 1800 NOK [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	You said yes to receiving NOK 1,000 instead of receiving NOK 1,800. Can you state briefly why you selected this option?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and R4PAD22=1] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4pad23b

Variable label:	Text: Chose 1800 NOK over 1000 NOK [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	You said yes to receiving NOK 1,800 instead of receiving NOK 1,000. Can you state briefly why you selected this option?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and R4PAD22=2] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4ran11

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1535] [Invalid:4762] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	747	48.7%	0.486645
2	2	788	51.3%	0.513355
Sysmiss		4762		NA

r4oc17_1

Variable label:	Economic aid: Increase, keep or reduce
Literal question:	We would now like to as you a few questions about Norway’s economic aid schemes. Some people think that the amount that the Norwegian authorities spend on economic aid should be increased, while others think it should be kept at the current level or reduced. What is your opinion. Do you think that the Norwegian authorities should increase, keep at the current level or reduce the amount spent on economic aid?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Increase	127	17.0%	0.17001339
2	Keep at the current level	511	68.4%	0.68406961
3	Reduce	87	11.6%	0.11646586
97	No answer	22	2.9%	0.02945114
98	Not asked	5550		NA

r4oc17_1a

Variable label:	Economic aid: Increase
Literal question:	Do you think the Norwegian authorities should increase allocations for economic aid quite substantially, or just slightly?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1 & R4OC17_1=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Quite substantially	76	59.8%	0.5984252
2	Just slightly	51	40.2%	0.4015748
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	6170		NA

r4oc17_1b

Variable label:	Economic aid: Reduce
Literal question:	Do you think the Norwegian authorities should reduce allocations for economic aid quite substantially, or just slightly?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1 & R4OC17_1=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Quite substantially	46	52.9%	0.52873563
2	Just slightly	40	46.0%	0.45977011
97	No answer	1	1.1%	0.01149425
98	Not asked	6210		NA

r4oc18_1a

Variable label:	Economic aid: Moral obligation to offer economic aid to the poor in Norway
Literal question:	Do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian authorities have a moral obligation to offer economic aid to the poor in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1. Question is asked on the same page as R4OC18_1B]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	380	50.9%	0.508701473
2	Slightly agree	317	42.4%	0.424364123
3	Slightly disagree	36	4.8%	0.048192771
4	Strongly disagree	3	0.4%	0.004016064
97	No answer	11	1.5%	0.014725569
98	Not asked	5550		NA

r4oc18_1b

Variable label:	Economic aid: Moral obligation to offer economic aid to the poor in Norway or other countries
Literal question:	Who do you believe the Norwegian authorities have the greatest moral obligation to provide economic aid to?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1. Question is asked on the same page as R4OC18_1A]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The poor in other countries	23	3.1%	0.03078983
2	The poor in Norway	354	47.4%	0.47389558
3	The authorities have an equally great moral obligation to assist both	356	47.7%	0.47657296
97	No answer	14	1.9%	0.01874163
98	Not asked	5550		NA

r4oc19_1

Variable label:	Economic aid: Effectiveness for the poor in Norway
Literal question:	How effective do you think Norway’s economic aid programmes have been for reducing poverty in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very effective	72	9.6%	0.09638554
2	Slightly effective	388	51.9%	0.51941098
3	Not very effective	261	34.9%	0.34939759
4	Not at all effective	16	2.1%	0.02141901
97	No answer	10	1.3%	0.01338688
98	Not asked	5550		NA

r4oc20_1

Variable label:	Economic aid: Why are recipients poor
Literal question:	Why do you think most recipients of economic aid are poor?
Technical description:	Please use the scale below where 1 represents “Because they don’t work hard enough” and 7 represents “Due to circumstances beyond their control”. [Asked if U=3 and ran11=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Because they don't work hard enough	14	1.9%	0.01874163
2	2	27	3.6%	0.03614458
3	3	72	9.6%	0.09638554
4	4	193	25.8%	0.25836680
5	5	237	31.7%	0.31726908
6	6	101	13.5%	0.13520750
7	7 Due to circumstances beyond their control	91	12.2%	0.12182062
97	No answer	12	1.6%	0.01606426
98	Not asked	5550		NA

r4oc21_1

Variable label:	Economic aid: The poor lacked basic necessities before they got aid
Literal question:	How likely is it that the recipients of economic aid lacked basic necessities such as shelter and nutritious food before they received aid from Norwegian authorities?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very likely	105	14.1%	0.140562249
2	Not very likely	396	53.0%	0.530120482
3	Quite unlikely	221	29.6%	0.295850067
4	Not at all likely	7	0.9%	0.009370817
97	No answer	18	2.4%	0.024096386
98	Not asked	5550		NA

r4oc17_2

Variable label:	Development aid: Increase, keep or reduce
Literal question:	We would now like to ask you some questions about Norway’s development aid programmes. Some people think that the amount the Norwegian authorities spend on development aid should be increased, while others think it should be kept at the current level or reduced. In your opinion, should the Norwegian authorities increase, keep at the current level or reduce the amount spent on development aid?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Increase	164	20.8%	0.20812183
2	Keep at the current level	433	54.9%	0.54949239
3	Reduce	179	22.7%	0.22715736
97	No answer	12	1.5%	0.01522843
98	Not asked	5509		NA

r4oc17_2a

Variable label:	Development aid: Increase
Literal question:	Do you think the Norwegian authorities should increase allocations for development aid quite substantially, or just slightly?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2 & R4OC17_2=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Quite substantially	134	81.7%	0.817073171
2	Just slightly	29	17.7%	0.176829268
97	No answer	1	0.6%	0.006097561
98	Not asked	6133		NA

r4oc17_2b

Variable label:	Development aid: Reduce
Literal question:	Do you think the Norwegian authorities should reduce allocations for development aid quite substantially, or just slightly?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2 & R4OC17_2=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Quite substantially	136	76.0%	0.7597765
2	Just slightly	43	24.0%	0.2402235
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	6118		NA

r4oc18_2a

Variable label:	Development aid: Moral obligation to offer aid to the poor in other countries
Literal question:	Do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian authorities have a moral obligation to offer development aid to the poor in other countries?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2. Question is asked on the same page as R4OC18_2B]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	337	42.8%	0.427664975
2	Slightly agree	338	42.9%	0.428934010
3	Slightly disagree	76	9.6%	0.096446701
4	Strongly disagree	31	3.9%	0.039340102
97	No answer	6	0.8%	0.007614213
98	Not asked	5509		NA

r4oc18_2b

Variable label:	Development aid: Moral obligation to offer aid to the poor in Norway or other countries
Literal question:	Who do you believe the Norwegian authorities have the greatest moral obligation to provide development aid to?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2. Question is asked on the same page as R4OC18_2A]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The poor in other countries	48	6.1%	0.06091371
2	The poor in Norway	257	32.6%	0.32614213
3	The authorities have an equally great moral obligation to assist both	473	60.0%	0.60025381
97	No answer	10	1.3%	0.01269036
98	Not asked	5509		NA

r4oc19_2

Variable label:	Development aid: Effectiveness for the poor in other countries
Literal question:	How effective do you think Norway’s development aid programmes have been for reducing poverty in other countries?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very effective	22	2.8%	0.027918782
2	Slightly effective	410	52.0%	0.520304569
3	Not very effective	280	35.5%	0.355329949
4	Not at all effective	69	8.8%	0.087563452
97	No answer	7	0.9%	0.008883249
98	Not asked	5509		NA

r4oc20_2

Variable label:	Development aid: Why are recipients poor
Literal question:	Why do you think that most recipients of development aid are poor?
Technical description:	Please use the scale below where 1 represents “Because they don’t work hard enough” and 7 represents “Due to circumstances beyond their control”. [Asked if U=3 and ran11=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Because they don't work hard enough	15	1.9%	0.019035533
2	2	9	1.1%	0.011421320
3	3	15	1.9%	0.019035533
4	4	66	8.4%	0.083756345
5	5	156	19.8%	0.197969543
6	6	194	24.6%	0.246192893
7	7 Due to circumstances beyond their control	326	41.4%	0.413705584
97	No answer	7	0.9%	0.008883249
98	Not asked	5509		NA

r4oc21_2

Variable label:	Development aid: The poor lacked basic necessities before they got aid
Literal question:	How likely is it that the recipients of development aid lacked basic necessities such as shelter and nutritious food before they received aid from Norwegian authorities?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very likely	314	39.8%	0.398477157
2	Not very likely	402	51.0%	0.510152284
3	Quite unlikely	48	6.1%	0.060913706
4	Not at all likely	5	0.6%	0.006345178
97	No answer	19	2.4%	0.024111675
98	Not asked	5509		NA

r4dv45d_1

Variable label:	Statement: Access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced for unhealthy people
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced if the patient concerned has an unhealthy lifestyle
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran9=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	13	2.7%	0.02674897
2	Agree	31	6.4%	0.06378601
3	Agree somewhat	92	18.9%	0.18930041
4	Neither agree nor disagree	83	17.1%	0.17078189
5	Disagree somewhat	56	11.5%	0.11522634
6	Disagree	131	27.0%	0.26954733
7	Strongly disagree	75	15.4%	0.15432099
97	No answer	5	1.0%	0.01028807
98	Not asked	5811		NA

r4dv45d_2

Variable label:	Statement: Unhealthy patients must pay more in fees
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	A patient with an unhealthy lifestyle should contribute more towards treatment than a patient with a healthy lifestyle
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran9=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	10	2.1%	0.02057613
2	Agree	26	5.3%	0.05349794
3	Agree somewhat	68	14.0%	0.13991770
4	Neither agree nor disagree	67	13.8%	0.13786008
5	Disagree somewhat	59	12.1%	0.12139918
6	Disagree	153	31.5%	0.31481481
7	Strongly disagree	98	20.2%	0.20164609
97	No answer	5	1.0%	0.01028807
98	Not asked	5811		NA

r4dv45d_3

Variable label:	Statement: Taxes on booze and cigarettes
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	The consumption of some products, e.g. alcohol and tobacco, increases the risk of disease and thus also overall health expenditure. Such products should therefore be taxed in order to fund the costs incurred in respect of increases in such risky behaviour
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran9=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	72	14.8%	0.14814815
2	Agree	102	21.0%	0.20987654
3	Agree somewhat	122	25.1%	0.25102881
4	Neither agree nor disagree	55	11.3%	0.11316872
5	Disagree somewhat	31	6.4%	0.06378601
6	Disagree	65	13.4%	0.13374486
7	Strongly disagree	33	6.8%	0.06790123
97	No answer	6	1.2%	0.01234568
98	Not asked	5811		NA

r4dv45d_4

Variable label:	Statement: Unhealthy patients should pay more in insurance
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	People with unhealthy lifestyles, e.g. smokers and people who consume too much alcohol, should pay more for health insurance than people with healthy lifestyles
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran9=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	30	6.2%	0.06172840
2	Agree	90	18.5%	0.18518519
3	Agree somewhat	91	18.7%	0.18724280
4	Neither agree nor disagree	64	13.2%	0.13168724
5	Disagree somewhat	45	9.3%	0.09259259
6	Disagree	105	21.6%	0.21604938
7	Strongly disagree	55	11.3%	0.11316872
97	No answer	6	1.2%	0.01234568
98	Not asked	5811		NA

r4dv45d_5

Variable label:	Statement: Unhealthy patients should be given less priority
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	If someone becomes ill, continuing to live an unhealthy lifestyle could ruin the effects of their treatment. So, if ill patients leading an unhealthy lifestyle do not change their habits, should the help they receive be given lower priority in the future than the help received by patients who have a healthy lifestyle?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran9=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	21	4.3%	0.04320988
2	Agree	55	11.3%	0.11316872
3	Agree somewhat	109	22.4%	0.22427984
4	Neither agree nor disagree	61	12.6%	0.12551440
5	Disagree somewhat	60	12.3%	0.12345679
6	Disagree	117	24.1%	0.24074074
7	Strongly disagree	58	11.9%	0.11934156
97	No answer	5	1.0%	0.01028807
98	Not asked	5811		NA

r4dv45d_6

Variable label:	Statement: Unhealthy patients that does not follow agreement should be given less priority
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	If a specific agreement has been entered into between a doctor and a patient about changing the patient’s lifestyle and the patient fails to comply with the agreement, should future treatment of the patient be given lower priority than that given to patients who comply with such agreements?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran9=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	24	4.9%	0.049382716
2	Agree	71	14.6%	0.146090535
3	Agree somewhat	122	25.1%	0.251028807
4	Neither agree nor disagree	68	14.0%	0.139917695
5	Disagree somewhat	56	11.5%	0.115226337
6	Disagree	97	20.0%	0.199588477
7	Strongly disagree	44	9.1%	0.090534979
97	No answer	4	0.8%	0.008230453
98	Not asked	5811		NA

r4ran21

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1533] [Invalid:4764] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	178	11.6%	0.1161122
2	2	216	14.1%	0.1409002
3	3	205	13.4%	0.1337247
4	4	160	10.4%	0.1043705
5	5	195	12.7%	0.1272016
6	6	175	11.4%	0.1141553
7	7	212	13.8%	0.1382909
8	8	192	12.5%	0.1252446
Sysmiss		4764		NA

r4dv51a

Variable label:	Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran21=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	46	25.8%	0.25842697
2	Should not be allowed to stay	65	36.5%	0.36516854
3	Don't know	65	36.5%	0.36516854
97	No answer	2	1.1%	0.01123596
98	Not asked	6119		NA

r4dv51b

Variable label:	Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, learned Norwegian
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have learnt Norwegian while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran21=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	78	36.1%	0.3611111
2	Should not be allowed to stay	68	31.5%	0.3148148
3	Don't know	70	32.4%	0.3240741
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	6081		NA

r4dv51c

Variable label:	Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, got a job
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have found a job while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran21=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	101	49.3%	0.49268293
2	Should not be allowed to stay	41	20.0%	0.20000000
3	Don't know	60	29.3%	0.29268293
97	No answer	3	1.5%	0.01463415
98	Not asked	6092		NA

r4dv51d

Variable label:	Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, participated actively in their local communities
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have participated actively in their local communities while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran21=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	60	37.5%	0.375
2	Should not be allowed to stay	44	27.5%	0.275
3	Don't know	56	35.0%	0.350
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.000
98	Not asked	6137		NA

r4dv51e

Variable label:	Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran21=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	33	16.9%	0.16923077
2	Should not be allowed to stay	83	42.6%	0.42564103
3	Don't know	76	39.0%	0.38974359
97	No answer	3	1.5%	0.01538462
98	Not asked	6102		NA

r4dv51f

Variable label:	Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, learned Norwegian
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have learnt Norwegian while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran21=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	45	25.7%	0.2571429
2	Should not be allowed to stay	73	41.7%	0.4171429
3	Don't know	57	32.6%	0.3257143
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	6122		NA

r4dv51g

Variable label:	Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, got a job
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have found a job while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran21=7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	69	32.5%	0.32547170
2	Should not be allowed to stay	75	35.4%	0.35377358
3	Don't know	61	28.8%	0.28773585
97	No answer	7	3.3%	0.03301887
98	Not asked	6085		NA

r4dv51h

Variable label:	Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, participated actively in their local communities
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have participated actively in their local communities while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and ran21=8]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	66	34.4%	0.3437500
2	Should not be allowed to stay	68	35.4%	0.3541667
3	Don't know	55	28.6%	0.2864583
97	No answer	3	1.6%	0.0156250
98	Not asked	6105		NA

r4dv52a

Variable label:	How strong are your views about asylum seekers being granted residence?
Literal question:	How strong are your views about asylum seekers being granted residence?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and either of the following variables =1: R4DV51a, R4DV51b, R4DV51c, R4DV51d, R4DV51e, R4DV51f, R4DV51g=1, or R4DV51h]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strong	67	13.5%	0.134538153
2	Strong	174	34.9%	0.349397590
3	Fairly strong	149	29.9%	0.299196787
4	Not very strong	79	15.9%	0.158634538
5	Not at all strong	25	5.0%	0.050200803
97	No answer	4	0.8%	0.008032129
98	Not asked	5799		NA

r4dv52b

Variable label:	How strong are your views about asylum seekers not being granted residence?
Literal question:	How strong are your views about asylum seekers not being granted residence?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=3 and either of the following variables =1: R4DV51a, R4DV51b, R4DV51c, R4DV51d, R4DV51e, R4DV51f, R4DV51g, or R4DV51h]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strong	81	15.7%	0.156673114
2	Strong	142	27.5%	0.274661509
3	Fairly strong	159	30.8%	0.307543520
4	Not very strong	84	16.2%	0.162475822
5	Not at all strong	47	9.1%	0.090909091
97	No answer	4	0.8%	0.007736944
98	Not asked	5780		NA

r4dv1

Variable label:	Pro and con regarding immigrants
Pre-question text:	We will now ask a few questions about current issues in Norway today, e.g. immigration and ethnic diversity. We are interested in your own opinion on these issues and we would ask you answer these questions to the best of your ability.
Literal question:	In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very great advantage	57	3.6%	0.035984848
2	Great advantage	306	19.3%	0.193181818
3	Slightly advantageous	673	42.5%	0.424873737
4	Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage	202	12.8%	0.127525253
5	A slight disadvantage	222	14.0%	0.140151515
6	A great disadvantage	77	4.9%	0.048611111
7	Very great disadvantage	36	2.3%	0.022727273
97	No answer	11	0.7%	0.006944444
98	Not asked	4713		NA

r4dv4

Variable label:	How important is immigration policy to you personally?
Literal question:	How important is immigration policy to you personally?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very important	181	11.4%	0.114267677
2	Important	579	36.6%	0.365530303
3	Somewhat important	602	38.0%	0.380050505
4	Not very important	192	12.1%	0.121212121
5	Not important at all	23	1.5%	0.014520202
97	No answer	7	0.4%	0.004419192
98	Not asked	4713		NA

r4dv6

Variable label:	Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
Literal question:	Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Labour Party	322	20.3%	0.203282828
2	The Progress Party	282	17.8%	0.178030303
3	The Conservative Party	265	16.7%	0.167297980
4	The Socialist Left Party	100	6.3%	0.063131313
5	The Centre Party	21	1.3%	0.013257576
6	The Christian Democrats	97	6.1%	0.061237374
7	The Liberal Party	99	6.2%	0.062500000
8	The Red Party	33	2.1%	0.020833333
9	The Green Party	13	0.8%	0.008207071
10	Other (please state which)	16	1.0%	0.010101010
11	None	301	19.0%	0.190025253
97	No answer	35	2.2%	0.022095960
98	Not asked	4713		NA

r4dv6_10_other

Variable label:	Other: Which party do you think has the best immigration policy? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4dv41

Variable label:	Statement: Men are more entitled to jobs than women during a downturn in the labour market.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Men are more entitled to jobs than women during a downturn in the labour market.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	30	1.9%	0.018939394
2	Agree	15	0.9%	0.009469697
3	Agree somewhat	48	3.0%	0.030303030
4	Neither agree nor disagree	108	6.8%	0.068181818
5	Disagree somewhat	50	3.2%	0.031565657
6	Disagree	322	20.3%	0.203282828
7	Strongly disagree	998	63.0%	0.630050505
97	No answer	13	0.8%	0.008207071
98	Not asked	4713		NA

r4ran13

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1583] [Invalid:4714] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	302	19.1%	0.1907770
2	2	307	19.4%	0.1939356
3	3	302	19.1%	0.1907770
4	4	339	21.4%	0.2141503
5	5	333	21.0%	0.2103601
Sysmiss		4714		NA

r4dv42a

Variable label:	Allow stand at local shopping centre: An anti-Islamic group
Literal question:	Imagine that an anti-Islamic group has asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that such a group should be allowed to do this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran13=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	18	6.0%	0.059602649
2	Agree	41	13.6%	0.135761589
3	Agree somewhat	44	14.6%	0.145695364
4	Neither agree nor disagree	46	15.2%	0.152317881
5	Disagree somewhat	26	8.6%	0.086092715
6	Disagree	56	18.5%	0.185430464
7	Strongly disagree	69	22.8%	0.228476821
97	No answer	2	0.7%	0.006622517
98	Not asked	5995		NA

r4dv42b

Variable label:	Allow stand at local shopping centre: A right wing extremist group
Literal question:	Imagine that a right wing extremist group has asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that such a group should be allowed to do this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran13=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	17	5.5%	0.05537459
2	Agree	44	14.3%	0.14332248
3	Agree somewhat	41	13.4%	0.13355049
4	Neither agree nor disagree	28	9.1%	0.09120521
5	Disagree somewhat	24	7.8%	0.07817590
6	Disagree	45	14.7%	0.14657980
7	Strongly disagree	102	33.2%	0.33224756
97	No answer	6	2.0%	0.01954397
98	Not asked	5990		NA

r4dv42c

Variable label:	Allow stand at local shopping centre: The Progress Party
Literal question:	Imagine that the Progress Party has asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that this party should be allowed to do this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran13=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	90	29.8%	0.298013245
2	Agree	95	31.5%	0.314569536
3	Agree somewhat	19	6.3%	0.062913907
4	Neither agree nor disagree	56	18.5%	0.185430464
5	Disagree somewhat	6	2.0%	0.019867550
6	Disagree	17	5.6%	0.056291391
7	Strongly disagree	16	5.3%	0.052980132
97	No answer	3	1.0%	0.009933775
98	Not asked	5995		NA

r4dv42d

Variable label:	Allow stand at local shopping centre: The Liberal Party
Literal question:	Imagine that the Liberal Party has asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that this party should be allowed to do this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran13=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	84	24.8%	0.24778761
2	Agree	108	31.9%	0.31858407
3	Agree somewhat	33	9.7%	0.09734513
4	Neither agree nor disagree	79	23.3%	0.23303835
5	Disagree somewhat	9	2.7%	0.02654867
6	Disagree	12	3.5%	0.03539823
7	Strongly disagree	10	2.9%	0.02949853
97	No answer	4	1.2%	0.01179941
98	Not asked	5958		NA

r4dv42e_1

Variable label:	Allow stand at local shopping centre: An anti-Islamic group
Pre-question text:	Imagine that an anti-Islamic group, a right wing extremist group, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party have asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that these groups should be allowed to do this?
Literal question:	An anti-Islamic group
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran13=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	30	9.0%	0.09009009
2	Agree	50	15.0%	0.15015015
3	Agree somewhat	38	11.4%	0.11411411
4	Neither agree nor disagree	40	12.0%	0.12012012
5	Disagree somewhat	20	6.0%	0.06006006
6	Disagree	48	14.4%	0.14414414
7	Strongly disagree	100	30.0%	0.30030030
97	No answer	7	2.1%	0.02102102
98	Not asked	5964		NA

r4dv42e_2

Variable label:	Allow stand at local shopping centre: A right wing extremist group
Pre-question text:	Imagine that an anti-Islamic group, a right wing extremist group, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party have asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that these groups should be allowed to do this?
Literal question:	A right wing extremist group
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran13=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	25	7.5%	0.07507508
2	Agree	41	12.3%	0.12312312
3	Agree somewhat	28	8.4%	0.08408408
4	Neither agree nor disagree	36	10.8%	0.10810811
5	Disagree somewhat	17	5.1%	0.05105105
6	Disagree	57	17.1%	0.17117117
7	Strongly disagree	120	36.0%	0.36036036
97	No answer	9	2.7%	0.02702703
98	Not asked	5964		NA

r4dv42e_3

Variable label:	Allow stand at local shopping centre: The Progress Party
Pre-question text:	Imagine that an anti-Islamic group, a right wing extremist group, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party have asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that these groups should be allowed to do this?
Literal question:	The Progress Party
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran13=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	69	20.7%	0.20720721
2	Agree	90	27.0%	0.27027027
3	Agree somewhat	34	10.2%	0.10210210
4	Neither agree nor disagree	57	17.1%	0.17117117
5	Disagree somewhat	17	5.1%	0.05105105
6	Disagree	23	6.9%	0.06906907
7	Strongly disagree	30	9.0%	0.09009009
97	No answer	13	3.9%	0.03903904
98	Not asked	5964		NA

r4dv42e_4

Variable label:	Allow stand at local shopping centre: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text:	Imagine that an anti-Islamic group, a right wing extremist group, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party have asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that these groups should be allowed to do this?
Literal question:	The Liberal Party
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran13=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	71	21.3%	0.21321321
2	Agree	97	29.1%	0.29129129
3	Agree somewhat	32	9.6%	0.09609610
4	Neither agree nor disagree	61	18.3%	0.18318318
5	Disagree somewhat	16	4.8%	0.04804805
6	Disagree	18	5.4%	0.05405405
7	Strongly disagree	24	7.2%	0.07207207
97	No answer	14	4.2%	0.04204204
98	Not asked	5964		NA

r4ran14

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1581] [Invalid:4716] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	276	17.5%	0.1745731
2	2	257	16.3%	0.1625553
3	3	284	18.0%	0.1796331
4	4	274	17.3%	0.1733080
5	5	247	15.6%	0.1562302
6	6	243	15.4%	0.1537002
Sysmiss		4716		NA

r4dv43a

Variable label:	Allow rental of local meeting room: Prophet’s Ummah
Literal question:	Imagine that the Muslim fundamentalist group, Prophet’s Ummah, has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Prophet’s Ummah should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran14=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	12	4.3%	0.04347826
2	Agree	44	15.9%	0.15942029
3	Agree somewhat	16	5.8%	0.05797101
4	Neither agree nor disagree	40	14.5%	0.14492754
5	Disagree somewhat	29	10.5%	0.10507246
6	Disagree	51	18.5%	0.18478261
7	Strongly disagree	77	27.9%	0.27898551
97	No answer	7	2.5%	0.02536232
98	Not asked	6021		NA

r4dv43b

Variable label:	Allow rental of local meeting room: SIAN
Literal question:	Imagine that the anti-Islamic group, Stop the Islamisation of Norway (SIAN), has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers. To what extent do you agree or disagree that SIAN should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran14=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	34	13.2%	0.13229572
2	Agree	47	18.3%	0.18287938
3	Agree somewhat	36	14.0%	0.14007782
4	Neither agree nor disagree	42	16.3%	0.16342412
5	Disagree somewhat	22	8.6%	0.08560311
6	Disagree	36	14.0%	0.14007782
7	Strongly disagree	35	13.6%	0.13618677
97	No answer	5	1.9%	0.01945525
98	Not asked	6040		NA

r4dv43c

Variable label:	Allow rental of local meeting room: The Progress Party
Literal question:	Imagine that the Progress Party has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Progress Party should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran14=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	87	30.6%	0.30633803
2	Agree	113	39.8%	0.39788732
3	Agree somewhat	19	6.7%	0.06690141
4	Neither agree nor disagree	50	17.6%	0.17605634
5	Disagree somewhat	6	2.1%	0.02112676
6	Disagree	5	1.8%	0.01760563
7	Strongly disagree	4	1.4%	0.01408451
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	6013		NA

r4dv43d

Variable label:	Allow rental of local meeting room: Muslims
Literal question:	Imagine that a Muslim congregation has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers. To what extent do you agree or disagree that such a Muslim congregation should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran14=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	52	19.0%	0.18978102
2	Agree	117	42.7%	0.42700730
3	Agree somewhat	32	11.7%	0.11678832
4	Neither agree nor disagree	35	12.8%	0.12773723
5	Disagree somewhat	18	6.6%	0.06569343
6	Disagree	9	3.3%	0.03284672
7	Strongly disagree	9	3.3%	0.03284672
97	No answer	2	0.7%	0.00729927
98	Not asked	6023		NA

r4dv43e

Variable label:	Allow rental of local meeting room: Free Church
Literal question:	Imagine that a Free Church congregation has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers. To what extent do you agree or disagree that such a Free Church congregation should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran14=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	42	17.0%	0.17004049
2	Agree	85	34.4%	0.34412955
3	Agree somewhat	35	14.2%	0.14170040
4	Neither agree nor disagree	52	21.1%	0.21052632
5	Disagree somewhat	9	3.6%	0.03643725
6	Disagree	6	2.4%	0.02429150
7	Strongly disagree	9	3.6%	0.03643725
97	No answer	9	3.6%	0.03643725
98	Not asked	6050		NA

r4dv43f

Variable label:	Allow rental of local meeting room: The Liberal Party
Literal question:	Imagine that the Liberal Party has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Liberal Party should be allowed to do this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran14=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	84	34.6%	0.345679012
2	Agree	94	38.7%	0.386831276
3	Agree somewhat	15	6.2%	0.061728395
4	Neither agree nor disagree	42	17.3%	0.172839506
5	Disagree somewhat	4	1.6%	0.016460905
6	Disagree	2	0.8%	0.008230453
7	Strongly disagree	1	0.4%	0.004115226
97	No answer	1	0.4%	0.004115226
98	Not asked	6054		NA

r4ran16

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1580] [Invalid:4717] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	249	15.8%	0.1575949
2	2	283	17.9%	0.1791139
3	3	253	16.0%	0.1601266
4	4	264	16.7%	0.1670886
5	5	266	16.8%	0.1683544
6	6	265	16.8%	0.1677215
Sysmiss		4717		NA

r4dv47a

Variable label:	Limit work immigration: Some of the poorest are from Romania
Literal question:	The financial crisis has caused considerable poverty in Europe. Some of the poorest Europeans are the Roma people from Romania and some of them come to Norway to seek work so that their families can have a better life. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce agreements designed to limit this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran16=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	31	12.4%	0.124497992
2	Agree	54	21.7%	0.216867470
3	Agree somewhat	48	19.3%	0.192771084
4	Neither agree nor disagree	38	15.3%	0.152610442
5	Disagree somewhat	26	10.4%	0.104417671
6	Disagree	43	17.3%	0.172690763
7	Strongly disagree	7	2.8%	0.028112450
97	No answer	2	0.8%	0.008032129
98	Not asked	6048		NA

r4dv47b

Variable label:	Limit work immigration: Some of the poorest are from Spain
Literal question:	The financial crisis has caused considerable poverty in Europe. Some of the poorest Europeans are from Spain and some of them come to Norway to seek work so that their families can have a better life. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce agreements designed to limit this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran16=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	10	3.5%	0.03533569
2	Agree	28	9.9%	0.09893993
3	Agree somewhat	48	17.0%	0.16961131
4	Neither agree nor disagree	57	20.1%	0.20141343
5	Disagree somewhat	46	16.3%	0.16254417
6	Disagree	63	22.3%	0.22261484
7	Strongly disagree	26	9.2%	0.09187279
97	No answer	5	1.8%	0.01766784
98	Not asked	6014		NA

r4dv47c

Variable label:	Limit work immigration: Some of the poorest are from Poland
Literal question:	The financial crisis has caused considerable poverty in Europe. Some of the poorest Europeans are from Poland and some of them come to Norway to seek work so that their families can have a better life. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce agreements designed to limit this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran16=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	12	4.7%	0.04743083
2	Agree	26	10.3%	0.10276680
3	Agree somewhat	57	22.5%	0.22529644
4	Neither agree nor disagree	44	17.4%	0.17391304
5	Disagree somewhat	51	20.2%	0.20158103
6	Disagree	47	18.6%	0.18577075
7	Strongly disagree	12	4.7%	0.04743083
97	No answer	4	1.6%	0.01581028
98	Not asked	6044		NA

r4dv47d

Variable label:	Limit immigration for beggars: Some of the poorest are from Romania
Literal question:	The financial crisis has caused considerable poverty in Europe. Some of the poorest Europeans are the Roma people from Romania and some of them come to Norway to beg so that their families can have a better life. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce agreements designed to limit this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran16=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	62	23.5%	0.23484848
2	Agree	79	29.9%	0.29924242
3	Agree somewhat	53	20.1%	0.20075758
4	Neither agree nor disagree	28	10.6%	0.10606061
5	Disagree somewhat	16	6.1%	0.06060606
6	Disagree	14	5.3%	0.05303030
7	Strongly disagree	9	3.4%	0.03409091
97	No answer	3	1.1%	0.01136364
98	Not asked	6033		NA

r4dv47e

Variable label:	Limit immigration for beggars: Some of the poorest are from Spain
Literal question:	The financial crisis has caused considerable poverty in Europe. Some of the poorest Europeans are from Spain and some of them come to Norway to beg so that their families can have a better life. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce agreements designed to limit this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran16=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	35	13.2%	0.13157895
2	Agree	71	26.7%	0.26691729
3	Agree somewhat	56	21.1%	0.21052632
4	Neither agree nor disagree	43	16.2%	0.16165414
5	Disagree somewhat	19	7.1%	0.07142857
6	Disagree	29	10.9%	0.10902256
7	Strongly disagree	9	3.4%	0.03383459
97	No answer	4	1.5%	0.01503759
98	Not asked	6031		NA

r4dv47f

Variable label:	Limit immigration for beggars: Some of the poorest are from Poland
Literal question:	The financial crisis has caused considerable poverty in Europe. Some of the poorest Europeans are from Poland and some of them come to Norway to beg so that their families can have a better life. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce agreements designed to limit this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran16=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	50	18.9%	0.18867925
2	Agree	67	25.3%	0.25283019
3	Agree somewhat	55	20.8%	0.20754717
4	Neither agree nor disagree	35	13.2%	0.13207547
5	Disagree somewhat	26	9.8%	0.09811321
6	Disagree	25	9.4%	0.09433962
7	Strongly disagree	5	1.9%	0.01886792
97	No answer	2	0.8%	0.00754717
98	Not asked	6032		NA

r4ran18

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1576] [Invalid:4721] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	274	17.4%	0.1738579
2	2	268	17.0%	0.1700508
3	3	276	17.5%	0.1751269
4	4	270	17.1%	0.1713198
5	5	222	14.1%	0.1408629
6	6	266	16.9%	0.1687817
Sysmiss		4721		NA

r4dv48a

Variable label:	Statement: Schools should allow Muslim pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question:	Schools should allow Muslim pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran18=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	20	7.3%	0.07299270
2	Agree	64	23.4%	0.23357664
3	Agree somewhat	64	23.4%	0.23357664
4	Neither agree nor disagree	44	16.1%	0.16058394
5	Disagree somewhat	23	8.4%	0.08394161
6	Disagree	31	11.3%	0.11313869
7	Strongly disagree	25	9.1%	0.09124088
97	No answer	3	1.1%	0.01094891
98	Not asked	6023		NA

r4dv48b

Variable label:	Statement: Schools should allow all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question:	Schools should allow all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran18=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	12	4.5%	0.04477612
2	Agree	46	17.2%	0.17164179
3	Agree somewhat	38	14.2%	0.14179104
4	Neither agree nor disagree	42	15.7%	0.15671642
5	Disagree somewhat	40	14.9%	0.14925373
6	Disagree	56	20.9%	0.20895522
7	Strongly disagree	31	11.6%	0.11567164
97	No answer	3	1.1%	0.01119403
98	Not asked	6029		NA

r4dv48c

Variable label:	Statement: Schools should encourage muslim pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question:	Schools should encourage Muslim pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran18=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	6	2.2%	0.02173913
2	Agree	28	10.1%	0.10144928
3	Agree somewhat	29	10.5%	0.10507246
4	Neither agree nor disagree	91	33.0%	0.32971014
5	Disagree somewhat	29	10.5%	0.10507246
6	Disagree	55	19.9%	0.19927536
7	Strongly disagree	34	12.3%	0.12318841
97	No answer	4	1.4%	0.01449275
98	Not asked	6021		NA

r4dv48d

Variable label:	Statement: Schools should encourage all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question:	Schools should encourage all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran18=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	4	1.5%	0.014814815
2	Agree	19	7.0%	0.070370370
3	Agree somewhat	33	12.2%	0.122222222
4	Neither agree nor disagree	47	17.4%	0.174074074
5	Disagree somewhat	30	11.1%	0.111111111
6	Disagree	71	26.3%	0.262962963
7	Strongly disagree	64	23.7%	0.237037037
97	No answer	2	0.7%	0.007407407
98	Not asked	6027		NA

r4dv48e

Variable label:	Statement: Schools should allow all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question:	Schools should allow all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran18=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	18	8.1%	0.081081081
2	Agree	43	19.4%	0.193693694
3	Agree somewhat	31	14.0%	0.139639640
4	Neither agree nor disagree	45	20.3%	0.202702703
5	Disagree somewhat	28	12.6%	0.126126126
6	Disagree	34	15.3%	0.153153153
7	Strongly disagree	22	9.9%	0.099099099
97	No answer	1	0.5%	0.004504505
98	Not asked	6075		NA

r4dv48f

Variable label:	Statement: Schools should encourage all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question:	Schools should encourage all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran18=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	4	1.5%	0.015037594
2	Agree	6	2.3%	0.022556391
3	Agree somewhat	9	3.4%	0.033834586
4	Neither agree nor disagree	34	12.8%	0.127819549
5	Disagree somewhat	26	9.8%	0.097744361
6	Disagree	97	36.5%	0.364661654
7	Strongly disagree	88	33.1%	0.330827068
97	No answer	2	0.8%	0.007518797
98	Not asked	6031		NA

r4ran19

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1576] [Invalid:4721] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	387	24.6%	0.2455584
2	2	371	23.5%	0.2354061
3	3	435	27.6%	0.2760152
4	4	383	24.3%	0.2430203
Sysmiss		4721		NA

r4dv49a

Variable label:	How long should immigrants live in Norway for before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
Literal question:	How long should immigrants live in Norway for before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran19=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	They should have full access immediately	53	13.7%	0.136950904
2	1 years	41	10.6%	0.105943152
3	2 years	28	7.2%	0.072351421
4	3 years	58	15.0%	0.149870801
5	4 years	12	3.1%	0.031007752
6	5 years	91	23.5%	0.235142119
7	6 years	6	1.6%	0.015503876
8	7 years	16	4.1%	0.041343669
9	8 years	3	0.8%	0.007751938
10	9 years	1	0.3%	0.002583979
11	10 years	38	9.8%	0.098191214
12	They should never have full access	21	5.4%	0.054263566
97	No answer	19	4.9%	0.049095607
98	Not asked	5910		NA

r4dv49b

Variable label:	How long should immigrants work for in Norway before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
Literal question:	How long should immigrants work for in Norway before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran19=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	They should have full access immediately	62	16.7%	0.167115903
2	1 years	53	14.3%	0.142857143
3	2 years	31	8.4%	0.083557951
4	3 years	59	15.9%	0.159029650
5	4 years	12	3.2%	0.032345013
6	5 years	78	21.0%	0.210242588
7	6 years	6	1.6%	0.016172507
8	7 years	10	2.7%	0.026954178
9	8 years	3	0.8%	0.008086253
10	9 years	0	0.0%	0.000000000
11	10 years	36	9.7%	0.097035040
12	They should never have full access	12	3.2%	0.032345013
97	No answer	9	2.4%	0.024258760
98	Not asked	5926		NA

r4dv49c

Variable label:	How long should immigrants work for and pay tax in Norway before they obtain full access to welfare benefits
Literal question:	How long should immigrants work for and pay tax in Norway before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran19=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	They should have full access immediately	74	17.0%	0.170114943
2	1 years	74	17.0%	0.170114943
3	2 years	48	11.0%	0.110344828
4	3 years	58	13.3%	0.133333333
5	4 years	14	3.2%	0.032183908
6	5 years	90	20.7%	0.206896552
7	6 years	8	1.8%	0.018390805
8	7 years	12	2.8%	0.027586207
9	8 years	1	0.2%	0.002298851
10	9 years	0	0.0%	0.000000000
11	10 years	30	6.9%	0.068965517
12	They should never have full access	11	2.5%	0.025287356
97	No answer	15	3.4%	0.034482759
98	Not asked	5862		NA

r4dv49d

Variable label:	How long should immigrants work for in Norway and contribute towards Norwegian society before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
Literal question:	How long should immigrants work for in Norway and contribute towards Norwegian society before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran19=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	They should have full access immediately	59	15.4%	0.154046997
2	1 years	64	16.7%	0.167101828
3	2 years	44	11.5%	0.114882507
4	3 years	46	12.0%	0.120104439
5	4 years	13	3.4%	0.033942559
6	5 years	72	18.8%	0.187989556
7	6 years	2	0.5%	0.005221932
8	7 years	15	3.9%	0.039164491
9	8 years	4	1.0%	0.010443864
10	9 years	0	0.0%	0.000000000
11	10 years	35	9.1%	0.091383812
12	They should never have full access	16	4.2%	0.041775457
97	No answer	13	3.4%	0.033942559
98	Not asked	5914		NA

r4ran20

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1576] [Invalid:4721] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	403	25.6%	0.2557107
2	2	384	24.4%	0.2436548
3	3	394	25.0%	0.2500000
4	4	395	25.1%	0.2506345
Sysmiss		4721		NA

r4dv50a

Variable label:	Agree or disagree: Muslim ideas about how women should behave in their private lives should be respected.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that…
Literal question:	…people have different views, but Muslim ideas about how women should behave in their private lives should be respected.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	11	2.7%	0.027295285
2	Agree	45	11.2%	0.111662531
3	Agree somewhat	54	13.4%	0.133995037
4	Neither agree nor disagree	84	20.8%	0.208436725
5	Disagree somewhat	63	15.6%	0.156327543
6	Disagree	75	18.6%	0.186104218
7	Strongly disagree	67	16.6%	0.166253102
97	No answer	4	1.0%	0.009925558
98	Not asked	5894		NA

r4dv50b

Variable label:	Agree or disagree: Muslim ideas about how women should behave should be respected.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that…
Literal question:	…people have different views, but Muslim ideas about how women should behave should be respected.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	6	1.6%	0.01562500
2	Agree	18	4.7%	0.04687500
3	Agree somewhat	21	5.5%	0.05468750
4	Neither agree nor disagree	49	12.8%	0.12760417
5	Disagree somewhat	62	16.1%	0.16145833
6	Disagree	94	24.5%	0.24479167
7	Strongly disagree	129	33.6%	0.33593750
97	No answer	5	1.3%	0.01302083
98	Not asked	5913		NA

r4dv50c

Variable label:	Agree or disagree: Muslim ideas about how women should behave in their private lives should be respected.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that…
Literal question:	…Muslim ideas about how women should behave in their private lives should be respected.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	9	2.3%	0.02284264
2	Agree	41	10.4%	0.10406091
3	Agree somewhat	33	8.4%	0.08375635
4	Neither agree nor disagree	80	20.3%	0.20304569
5	Disagree somewhat	58	14.7%	0.14720812
6	Disagree	63	16.0%	0.15989848
7	Strongly disagree	106	26.9%	0.26903553
97	No answer	4	1.0%	0.01015228
98	Not asked	5903		NA

r4dv50d

Variable label:	Agree or disagree: Muslim ideas about how women should behave should be respected.
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that…
Literal question:	…Muslim ideas about how women should behave should be respected.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran20=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	8	2.0%	0.02025316
2	Agree	8	2.0%	0.02025316
3	Agree somewhat	18	4.6%	0.04556962
4	Neither agree nor disagree	39	9.9%	0.09873418
5	Disagree somewhat	43	10.9%	0.10886076
6	Disagree	131	33.2%	0.33164557
7	Strongly disagree	144	36.5%	0.36455696
97	No answer	4	1.0%	0.01012658
98	Not asked	5902		NA

r4ran28

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1575] [Invalid:4722] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	193	12.3%	0.1225397
2	2	203	12.9%	0.1288889
3	3	193	12.3%	0.1225397
4	4	199	12.6%	0.1263492
5	5	198	12.6%	0.1257143
6	6	188	11.9%	0.1193651
7	7	188	11.9%	0.1193651
8	8	213	13.5%	0.1352381
Sysmiss		4722		NA

r4dv51a_2

Variable label:	Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	50	25.9%	0.259067358
2	Should not be allowed to stay	78	40.4%	0.404145078
3	Don't know	64	33.2%	0.331606218
97	No answer	1	0.5%	0.005181347
98	Not asked	6104		NA

r4dv51b_2

Variable label:	Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, learned Norwegian
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have learnt Norwegian while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	63	31.0%	0.310344828
2	Should not be allowed to stay	79	38.9%	0.389162562
3	Don't know	60	29.6%	0.295566502
97	No answer	1	0.5%	0.004926108
98	Not asked	6094		NA

r4dv51c_2

Variable label:	Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, got a job
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have found a job while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	71	36.8%	0.3678756
2	Should not be allowed to stay	66	34.2%	0.3419689
3	Don't know	56	29.0%	0.2901554
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	6104		NA

r4dv51d_2

Variable label:	Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, participated actively in their local communities
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have participated actively in their local communities while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran28=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	69	34.7%	0.3467337
2	Should not be allowed to stay	51	25.6%	0.2562814
3	Don't know	79	39.7%	0.3969849
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	6098		NA

r4dv51e_2

Variable label:	Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran28=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	40	20.2%	0.20202020
2	Should not be allowed to stay	95	48.0%	0.47979798
3	Don't know	61	30.8%	0.30808081
97	No answer	2	1.0%	0.01010101
98	Not asked	6099		NA

r4dv51f_2

Variable label:	Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, learned Norwegian
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have learnt Norwegian while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran28=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	40	21.3%	0.21276596
2	Should not be allowed to stay	71	37.8%	0.37765957
3	Don't know	74	39.4%	0.39361702
97	No answer	3	1.6%	0.01595745
98	Not asked	6109		NA

r4dv51g_2

Variable label:	Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, got a job
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have found a job while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran28=7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	68	36.2%	0.3617021
2	Should not be allowed to stay	48	25.5%	0.2553191
3	Don't know	68	36.2%	0.3617021
97	No answer	4	2.1%	0.0212766
98	Not asked	6109		NA

r4dv51h_2

Variable label:	Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, participated actively in their local communities
Pre-question text:	Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
Literal question:	Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have participated actively in their local communities while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran28=8]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to stay	74	34.7%	0.34741784
2	Should not be allowed to stay	61	28.6%	0.28638498
3	Don't know	75	35.2%	0.35211268
97	No answer	3	1.4%	0.01408451
98	Not asked	6084		NA

r4dv52a_2

Variable label:	Opinion about asylum seekers being granted residence
Literal question:	How strong are your views about asylum seekers being granted residence?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and either of the following variables =1: R4DV51a_2, R4DV51b_2, R4DV51c_2, R4DV51d_2=1, R4DV51e_2, R4DV51f_2, R4DV51g_2, or R4DV51h_2 ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strong	46	9.7%	0.096842105
2	Strong	157	33.1%	0.330526316
3	Fairly strong	143	30.1%	0.301052632
4	Not very strong	92	19.4%	0.193684211
5	Not at all strong	33	6.9%	0.069473684
97	No answer	4	0.8%	0.008421053
98	Not asked	5822		NA

r4dv52b_2

Variable label:	Opinion about asylum seekers not being granted residence
Literal question:	How strong are your views about asylum seekers not being granted residence?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and either of the following variables =1: R4DV51a_2, R4DV51b_2, R4DV51c_2, R4DV51d_2, R4DV51e_2, R4DV51f_2, R4DV51g_2, or R4DV51h_2=2 ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strong	87	15.8%	0.15846995
2	Strong	148	27.0%	0.26958106
3	Fairly strong	123	22.4%	0.22404372
4	Not very strong	108	19.7%	0.19672131
5	Not at all strong	76	13.8%	0.13843352
97	No answer	7	1.3%	0.01275046
98	Not asked	5748		NA

r4ran27

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1574] [Invalid:4723] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	281	17.9%	0.1785260
2	2	269	17.1%	0.1709022
3	3	281	17.9%	0.1785260
4	4	258	16.4%	0.1639136
5	5	258	16.4%	0.1639136
6	6	227	14.4%	0.1442186
Sysmiss		4723		NA

r4dv53a

Variable label:	Caricatures poking fun: Muslims
Literal question:	Some people think that it is wrong if the newspapers publish caricatures which poke fun at the religious beliefs of Muslims. Others think that it is right for newspapers to publish such caricatures. What is your personal opinion? It is…
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran27=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	completely wrong to publish such caricatures	30	10.7%	0.106761566
2	wrong	20	7.1%	0.071174377
3	slightly wrong	37	13.2%	0.131672598
4	neither right nor wrong	64	22.8%	0.227758007
5	slightly right	41	14.6%	0.145907473
6	right	44	15.7%	0.156583630
7	completely right to publish such caricatures	44	15.7%	0.156583630
97	No answer	1	0.4%	0.003558719
98	Not asked	6016		NA

r4dv53b

Variable label:	Caricatures poking fun: Jews
Literal question:	Some people think that it is wrong if the newspapers publish caricatures which poke fun at the religious beliefs of Jews. Others think that it is right for newspapers to publish such caricatures. What is your personal opinion? It is…
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran27=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	completely wrong to publish such caricatures	19	7.1%	0.07063197
2	wrong	28	10.4%	0.10408922
3	slightly wrong	41	15.2%	0.15241636
4	neither right nor wrong	57	21.2%	0.21189591
5	slightly right	36	13.4%	0.13382900
6	right	38	14.1%	0.14126394
7	completely right to publish such caricatures	47	17.5%	0.17472119
97	No answer	3	1.1%	0.01115242
98	Not asked	6028		NA

r4dv53c

Variable label:	Caricatures poking fun: Religious beliefs
Literal question:	Some people think that it is wrong if the newspapers publish caricatures which poke fun at the religious beliefs of people with deeply held beliefs. Others think that it is right for newspapers to publish such caricatures. What is your personal opinion? It is…
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran27=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	completely wrong to publish such caricatures	32	11.4%	0.113879004
2	wrong	32	11.4%	0.113879004
3	slightly wrong	43	15.3%	0.153024911
4	neither right nor wrong	59	21.0%	0.209964413
5	slightly right	29	10.3%	0.103202847
6	right	33	11.7%	0.117437722
7	completely right to publish such caricatures	51	18.1%	0.181494662
97	No answer	2	0.7%	0.007117438
98	Not asked	6016		NA

r4dv53d

Variable label:	Caricatures mocking: Muslims
Literal question:	Some people think that it is wrong if the newspapers publish caricatures which mock the religious beliefs of Muslims. Others think that it is right for newspapers to publish such caricatures. What is your personal opinion? It is…
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran27=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	completely wrong to publish such caricatures	23	8.9%	0.089147287
2	wrong	25	9.7%	0.096899225
3	slightly wrong	45	17.4%	0.174418605
4	neither right nor wrong	63	24.4%	0.244186047
5	slightly right	27	10.5%	0.104651163
6	right	34	13.2%	0.131782946
7	completely right to publish such caricatures	39	15.1%	0.151162791
97	No answer	2	0.8%	0.007751938
98	Not asked	6039		NA

r4dv53e

Variable label:	Caricatures mocking: Jews
Literal question:	Some people think that it is wrong if the newspapers publish caricatures which mock the religious beliefs of Jews. Others think that it is right for newspapers to publish such caricatures. What is your personal opinion? It is…
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran27=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	completely wrong to publish such caricatures	19	7.4%	0.073643411
2	wrong	36	14.0%	0.139534884
3	slightly wrong	37	14.3%	0.143410853
4	neither right nor wrong	57	22.1%	0.220930233
5	slightly right	37	14.3%	0.143410853
6	right	32	12.4%	0.124031008
7	completely right to publish such caricatures	38	14.7%	0.147286822
97	No answer	2	0.8%	0.007751938
98	Not asked	6039		NA

r4dv53f

Variable label:	Caricatures mocking: Religious beliefs
Literal question:	Some people think that it is wrong if the newspapers publish caricatures which mock the religious beliefs of people with deeply held beliefs. Others think that it is right for newspapers to publish such caricatures. What is your personal opinion? It is…
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran27=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	completely wrong to publish such caricatures	18	7.9%	0.07929515
2	wrong	28	12.3%	0.12334802
3	slightly wrong	26	11.5%	0.11453744
4	neither right nor wrong	52	22.9%	0.22907489
5	slightly right	29	12.8%	0.12775330
6	right	30	13.2%	0.13215859
7	completely right to publish such caricatures	41	18.1%	0.18061674
97	No answer	3	1.3%	0.01321586
98	Not asked	6070		NA

r4ran23

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1574] [Invalid:4723] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	253	16.1%	0.1607370
2	2	276	17.5%	0.1753494
3	3	279	17.7%	0.1772554
4	4	248	15.8%	0.1575604
5	5	247	15.7%	0.1569250
6	6	271	17.2%	0.1721728
Sysmiss		4723		NA

r4mi5a

Variable label:	Ban on sexual services: For or against
Literal question:	In 2008 the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) passed the Norwegian law prohibiting the buying of sexual services. What do you think about the ban on purchasing sexual services in Norway? I am…
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran23=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely in favour of the ban	47	18.6%	0.18577075
2	In favour of the ban	77	30.4%	0.30434783
3	Slightly in favour of the ban	15	5.9%	0.05928854
4	Neither for nor against the ban	55	21.7%	0.21739130
5	Slightly against the ban	17	6.7%	0.06719368
6	Against the ban	25	9.9%	0.09881423
7	Completely against the ban	14	5.5%	0.05533597
97	No answer	3	1.2%	0.01185771
98	Not asked	6044		NA

r4mi5b

Variable label:	Ban on sexual services: Makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse
Literal question:	In 2008 the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) passed the Norwegian law prohibiting the buying of sexual services. Some people have opposed the ban because it makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse and consequently puts their lives and health in danger. What do you think about the ban on purchasing sexual services in Norway? I am…
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran23=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely in favour of the ban	38	13.8%	0.13768116
2	In favour of the ban	78	28.3%	0.28260870
3	Slightly in favour of the ban	22	8.0%	0.07971014
4	Neither for nor against the ban	63	22.8%	0.22826087
5	Slightly against the ban	30	10.9%	0.10869565
6	Against the ban	27	9.8%	0.09782609
7	Completely against the ban	11	4.0%	0.03985507
97	No answer	7	2.5%	0.02536232
98	Not asked	6021		NA

r4mi5c

Variable label:	Ban on sexual services: ECHR may invalidate ban
Literal question:	In 2008 the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) passed the Norwegian law prohibiting the buying of sexual services. The European Court of Human Rights may declare the ban to be invalid. What do you think about the ban on purchasing sexual services in Norway? I am…
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran23=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely in favour of the ban	40	14.3%	0.143369176
2	In favour of the ban	82	29.4%	0.293906810
3	Slightly in favour of the ban	27	9.7%	0.096774194
4	Neither for nor against the ban	65	23.3%	0.232974910
5	Slightly against the ban	24	8.6%	0.086021505
6	Against the ban	30	10.8%	0.107526882
7	Completely against the ban	9	3.2%	0.032258065
97	No answer	2	0.7%	0.007168459
98	Not asked	6018		NA

r4mi5d

Variable label:	Ban on sexual services: ECHR may invalidate ban, makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse
Literal question:	In 2008 the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) passed the Norwegian law prohibiting the buying of sexual services. The European Court of Human Rights may declare the ban to be invalid because it makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse and consequently puts their lives and health in danger. What do you think about the ban on purchasing sexual services in Norway? I am…
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran23=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely in favour of the ban	22	8.9%	0.08870968
2	In favour of the ban	68	27.4%	0.27419355
3	Slightly in favour of the ban	25	10.1%	0.10080645
4	Neither for nor against the ban	65	26.2%	0.26209677
5	Slightly against the ban	23	9.3%	0.09274194
6	Against the ban	28	11.3%	0.11290323
7	Completely against the ban	10	4.0%	0.04032258
97	No answer	7	2.8%	0.02822581
98	Not asked	6049		NA

r4mi5e

Variable label:	Ban on sexual services: Supreme Court of Canada declared a similar ban to be invalid
Literal question:	In 2008 the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) passed the Norwegian law prohibiting the buying of sexual services. In 2013 the Supreme Court of Canada declared a similar ban to be invalid because it makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse and consequently puts their lives and health in danger. What do you think about the ban on purchasing sexual services in Norway? I am…
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran23=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely in favour of the ban	27	10.9%	0.109311741
2	In favour of the ban	60	24.3%	0.242914980
3	Slightly in favour of the ban	29	11.7%	0.117408907
4	Neither for nor against the ban	56	22.7%	0.226720648
5	Slightly against the ban	33	13.4%	0.133603239
6	Against the ban	31	12.6%	0.125506073
7	Completely against the ban	10	4.0%	0.040485830
97	No answer	1	0.4%	0.004048583
98	Not asked	6050		NA

r4mi5f

Variable label:	Ban on sexual services: The Norwegian Supreme Court may declare the ban to be invalid
Literal question:	In 2008 the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) passed the Norwegian law prohibiting the buying of sexual services. The Norwegian Supreme Court may declare the ban to be invalid because it makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse and consequently puts their lives and health in danger. What do you think about the ban on purchasing sexual services in Norway? I am…
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran23=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Completely in favour of the ban	25	9.2%	0.09225092
2	In favour of the ban	66	24.4%	0.24354244
3	Slightly in favour of the ban	29	10.7%	0.10701107
4	Neither for nor against the ban	65	24.0%	0.23985240
5	Slightly against the ban	38	14.0%	0.14022140
6	Against the ban	33	12.2%	0.12177122
7	Completely against the ban	9	3.3%	0.03321033
97	No answer	6	2.2%	0.02214022
98	Not asked	6026		NA

r4ran17

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1573] [Invalid:4724] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	522	33.2%	0.3318500
2	2	520	33.1%	0.3305785
3	3	531	33.8%	0.3375715
Sysmiss		4724		NA

r4dv45a_1

Variable label:	Statement: Access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced for unhealthy people
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced if the patient concerned has an unhealthy lifestyle
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	11	2.1%	0.021072797
2	Agree	29	5.6%	0.055555556
3	Agree somewhat	89	17.0%	0.170498084
4	Neither agree nor disagree	80	15.3%	0.153256705
5	Disagree somewhat	56	10.7%	0.107279693
6	Disagree	173	33.1%	0.331417625
7	Strongly disagree	79	15.1%	0.151340996
97	No answer	5	1.0%	0.009578544
98	Not asked	5775		NA

r4dv45a_2

Variable label:	Statement: Unhealthy patients must pay more in fees
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	A patient with an unhealthy lifestyle should contribute more towards treatment than a patient with a healthy lifestyle
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	7	1.3%	0.01340996
2	Agree	20	3.8%	0.03831418
3	Agree somewhat	53	10.2%	0.10153257
4	Neither agree nor disagree	59	11.3%	0.11302682
5	Disagree somewhat	60	11.5%	0.11494253
6	Disagree	194	37.2%	0.37164751
7	Strongly disagree	122	23.4%	0.23371648
97	No answer	7	1.3%	0.01340996
98	Not asked	5775		NA

r4dv45a_3

Variable label:	Statement: Taxes on booze and cigarettes
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	The consumption of some products, e.g. alcohol and tobacco, increases the risk of disease and thus also overall health expenditure. Such products should therefore be taxed in order to fund the costs incurred in respect of increases in such risky behaviour
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	66	12.6%	0.12643678
2	Agree	108	20.7%	0.20689655
3	Agree somewhat	136	26.1%	0.26053640
4	Neither agree nor disagree	57	10.9%	0.10919540
5	Disagree somewhat	46	8.8%	0.08812261
6	Disagree	75	14.4%	0.14367816
7	Strongly disagree	28	5.4%	0.05363985
97	No answer	6	1.1%	0.01149425
98	Not asked	5775		NA

r4dv45a_4

Variable label:	Statement: Unhealthy patients should pay more in insurance
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	People with unhealthy lifestyles, e.g. smokers and people who consume too much alcohol, should pay more for health insurance than people with healthy lifestyles
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	33	6.3%	0.06321839
2	Agree	67	12.8%	0.12835249
3	Agree somewhat	116	22.2%	0.22222222
4	Neither agree nor disagree	57	10.9%	0.10919540
5	Disagree somewhat	46	8.8%	0.08812261
6	Disagree	132	25.3%	0.25287356
7	Strongly disagree	65	12.5%	0.12452107
97	No answer	6	1.1%	0.01149425
98	Not asked	5775		NA

r4dv45a_5

Variable label:	Statement: Unhealthy patients should be given less priority
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	If someone becomes ill, continuing to live an unhealthy lifestyle could ruin the effects of their treatment. So, if ill patients leading an unhealthy lifestyle do not change their habits, should the help they receive be given lower priority in the future than the help received by patients who have a healthy lifestyle?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	15	2.9%	0.02873563
2	Agree	52	10.0%	0.09961686
3	Agree somewhat	136	26.1%	0.26053640
4	Neither agree nor disagree	56	10.7%	0.10727969
5	Disagree somewhat	62	11.9%	0.11877395
6	Disagree	118	22.6%	0.22605364
7	Strongly disagree	77	14.8%	0.14750958
97	No answer	6	1.1%	0.01149425
98	Not asked	5775		NA

r4dv45a_6

Variable label:	Statement: Unhealthy patients that does not follow agreement should be given less priority
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	If a specific agreement has been entered into between a doctor and a patient about changing the patient’s lifestyle and the patient fails to comply with the agreement, should future treatment of the patient be given lower priority than that given to patients who comply with such agreements?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	21	4.0%	0.04022989
2	Agree	63	12.1%	0.12068966
3	Agree somewhat	127	24.3%	0.24329502
4	Neither agree nor disagree	80	15.3%	0.15325670
5	Disagree somewhat	61	11.7%	0.11685824
6	Disagree	110	21.1%	0.21072797
7	Strongly disagree	54	10.3%	0.10344828
97	No answer	6	1.1%	0.01149425
98	Not asked	5775		NA

r4dv45b_1

Variable label:	Just statement: Access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced for unhealthy people
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	It is fair that access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced if the patient concerned has an unhealthy lifestyle
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	14	2.7%	0.02692308
2	Agree	37	7.1%	0.07115385
3	Agree somewhat	105	20.2%	0.20192308
4	Neither agree nor disagree	79	15.2%	0.15192308
5	Disagree somewhat	64	12.3%	0.12307692
6	Disagree	145	27.9%	0.27884615
7	Strongly disagree	69	13.3%	0.13269231
97	No answer	7	1.3%	0.01346154
98	Not asked	5777		NA

r4dv45b_2

Variable label:	Just statement: Unhealthy patients must pay more in fees
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	It is fair that a patient with an unhealthy lifestyle should contribute more towards treatment than a patient with a healthy lifestyle
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	9	1.7%	0.01730769
2	Agree	23	4.4%	0.04423077
3	Agree somewhat	67	12.9%	0.12884615
4	Neither agree nor disagree	67	12.9%	0.12884615
5	Disagree somewhat	71	13.7%	0.13653846
6	Disagree	185	35.6%	0.35576923
7	Strongly disagree	92	17.7%	0.17692308
97	No answer	6	1.2%	0.01153846
98	Not asked	5777		NA

r4dv45b_3

Variable label:	Just statement: Taxes on booze and cigarettes
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	The consumption of some products, e.g. alcohol and tobacco, increases the risk of disease and thus also overall health expenditure. It is therefore fair that such products should be taxed in order to fund the costs incurred in respect of increases in such risky behaviour
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	90	17.3%	0.17307692
2	Agree	160	30.8%	0.30769231
3	Agree somewhat	119	22.9%	0.22884615
4	Neither agree nor disagree	43	8.3%	0.08269231
5	Disagree somewhat	39	7.5%	0.07500000
6	Disagree	41	7.9%	0.07884615
7	Strongly disagree	21	4.0%	0.04038462
97	No answer	7	1.3%	0.01346154
98	Not asked	5777		NA

r4dv45b_4

Variable label:	Just statement: Unhealthy patients should pay more in insurance
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	It is fair that people with unhealthy lifestyles, e.g. smokers and people who consume too much alcohol, should pay more for health insurance than people with healthy lifestyles
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	37	7.1%	0.07115385
2	Agree	82	15.8%	0.15769231
3	Agree somewhat	120	23.1%	0.23076923
4	Neither agree nor disagree	74	14.2%	0.14230769
5	Disagree somewhat	52	10.0%	0.10000000
6	Disagree	93	17.9%	0.17884615
7	Strongly disagree	55	10.6%	0.10576923
97	No answer	7	1.3%	0.01346154
98	Not asked	5777		NA

r4dv45b_5

Variable label:	Just statement: Unhealthy patients should be given less priority
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	If someone becomes ill, continuing to live an unhealthy lifestyle could ruin the effects of their treatment. So, if ill patients leading an unhealthy lifestyle do not change their habits, is it fair that the help they receive should be given lower priority in the future than the help received by patients who have a healthy lifestyle?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	12	2.3%	0.02307692
2	Agree	59	11.3%	0.11346154
3	Agree somewhat	127	24.4%	0.24423077
4	Neither agree nor disagree	65	12.5%	0.12500000
5	Disagree somewhat	61	11.7%	0.11730769
6	Disagree	124	23.8%	0.23846154
7	Strongly disagree	63	12.1%	0.12115385
97	No answer	9	1.7%	0.01730769
98	Not asked	5777		NA

r4dv45b_6

Variable label:	Just statement: Unhealthy patients that does not follow agreement should be given less priority
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	If a specific agreement has been entered into between a doctor and a patient about changing the patient’s lifestyle and the patient fails to comply with the agreement, is it fair that future treatment of the patient should be given lower priority than that given to patients who comply with such agreements?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	17	3.3%	0.03269231
2	Agree	84	16.2%	0.16153846
3	Agree somewhat	135	26.0%	0.25961538
4	Neither agree nor disagree	66	12.7%	0.12692308
5	Disagree somewhat	60	11.5%	0.11538462
6	Disagree	89	17.1%	0.17115385
7	Strongly disagree	58	11.2%	0.11153846
97	No answer	11	2.1%	0.02115385
98	Not asked	5777		NA

r4dv45c_1

Variable label:	Unsertain about cause of illness: Access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced for unhealthy people
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. There is often considerable uncertainty about the determination of whether or not a patient’s lifestyle is actually the cause of their state of health. The extent to which the patient concerned is able to avoid his/her unhealthy lifestyle is also often unclear. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	It is fair that access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced if the patient concerned has an unhealthy lifestyle
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	14	2.6%	0.026365348
2	Agree	39	7.3%	0.073446328
3	Agree somewhat	122	23.0%	0.229755179
4	Neither agree nor disagree	71	13.4%	0.133709981
5	Disagree somewhat	55	10.4%	0.103578154
6	Disagree	159	29.9%	0.299435028
7	Strongly disagree	67	12.6%	0.126177024
97	No answer	4	0.8%	0.007532957
98	Not asked	5766		NA

r4dv45c_2

Variable label:	Unsertain about cause of illness: Unhealthy patients must pay more in fees
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. There is often considerable uncertainty about the determination of whether or not a patient’s lifestyle is actually the cause of their state of health. The extent to which the patient concerned is able to avoid his/her unhealthy lifestyle is also often unclear. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	It is fair that a patient with an unhealthy lifestyle should contribute more towards treatment than a patient with a healthy lifestyle
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	7	1.3%	0.013182674
2	Agree	21	4.0%	0.039548023
3	Agree somewhat	64	12.1%	0.120527307
4	Neither agree nor disagree	67	12.6%	0.126177024
5	Disagree somewhat	73	13.7%	0.137476460
6	Disagree	175	33.0%	0.329566855
7	Strongly disagree	121	22.8%	0.227871940
97	No answer	3	0.6%	0.005649718
98	Not asked	5766		NA

r4dv45c_3

Variable label:	Unsertain about cause of illness: Taxes on booze and cigarettes
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. There is often considerable uncertainty about the determination of whether or not a patient’s lifestyle is actually the cause of their state of health. The extent to which the patient concerned is able to avoid his/her unhealthy lifestyle is also often unclear. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	The consumption of some products, e.g. alcohol and tobacco, increases the risk of disease and thus also overall health expenditure. It is therefore fair that such products should be taxed in order to fund the costs incurred in respect of increases in such risky behaviour
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	92	17.3%	0.173258004
2	Agree	179	33.7%	0.337099812
3	Agree somewhat	111	20.9%	0.209039548
4	Neither agree nor disagree	47	8.9%	0.088512241
5	Disagree somewhat	31	5.8%	0.058380414
6	Disagree	39	7.3%	0.073446328
7	Strongly disagree	28	5.3%	0.052730697
97	No answer	4	0.8%	0.007532957
98	Not asked	5766		NA

r4dv45c_4

Variable label:	Unsertain about cause of illness: Unhealthy patients should pay more in insurance
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. There is often considerable uncertainty about the determination of whether or not a patient’s lifestyle is actually the cause of their state of health. The extent to which the patient concerned is able to avoid his/her unhealthy lifestyle is also often unclear. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	It is fair that people with unhealthy lifestyles, e.g. smokers and people who consume too much alcohol, should pay more for health insurance than people with healthy lifestyles
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	39	7.3%	0.073446328
2	Agree	87	16.4%	0.163841808
3	Agree somewhat	117	22.0%	0.220338983
4	Neither agree nor disagree	73	13.7%	0.137476460
5	Disagree somewhat	50	9.4%	0.094161959
6	Disagree	93	17.5%	0.175141243
7	Strongly disagree	69	13.0%	0.129943503
97	No answer	3	0.6%	0.005649718
98	Not asked	5766		NA

r4dv45c_5

Variable label:	Unsertain about cause of illness: Unhealthy patients should be given less priority
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. There is often considerable uncertainty about the determination of whether or not a patient’s lifestyle is actually the cause of their state of health. The extent to which the patient concerned is able to avoid his/her unhealthy lifestyle is also often unclear. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	If someone becomes ill, continuing to live an unhealthy lifestyle could ruin the effects of their treatment. So, if ill patients leading an unhealthy lifestyle do not change their habits, is it fair that the help they receive should be given lower priority in the future than the help received by patients who have a healthy lifestyle?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	24	4.5%	0.045197740
2	Agree	62	11.7%	0.116760829
3	Agree somewhat	112	21.1%	0.210922787
4	Neither agree nor disagree	69	13.0%	0.129943503
5	Disagree somewhat	63	11.9%	0.118644068
6	Disagree	125	23.5%	0.235404896
7	Strongly disagree	73	13.7%	0.137476460
97	No answer	3	0.6%	0.005649718
98	Not asked	5766		NA

r4dv45c_6

Variable label:	Unsertain about cause of illness: Unhealthy patients that does not follow agreement should be given less priority
Pre-question text:	We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. There is often considerable uncertainty about the determination of whether or not a patient’s lifestyle is actually the cause of their state of health. The extent to which the patient concerned is able to avoid his/her unhealthy lifestyle is also often unclear. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	If a specific agreement has been entered into between a doctor and a patient about changing the patient’s lifestyle and the patient fails to comply with the agreement, is it fair that future treatment of the patient should be given lower priority than that given to patients who comply with such agreements?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran17=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	23	4.3%	0.043314501
2	Agree	86	16.2%	0.161958569
3	Agree somewhat	118	22.2%	0.222222222
4	Neither agree nor disagree	64	12.1%	0.120527307
5	Disagree somewhat	75	14.1%	0.141242938
6	Disagree	108	20.3%	0.203389831
7	Strongly disagree	54	10.2%	0.101694915
97	No answer	3	0.6%	0.005649718
98	Not asked	5766		NA

r4ran15

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1568] [Invalid:4729] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	823	52.5%	0.5248724
2	2	745	47.5%	0.4751276
Sysmiss		4729		NA

r4dv46a_2

Variable label:	Lower priority of health care: Overweight/obesity
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Overweight/obesity
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	66	8.0%	0.080194411
2	No	650	79.0%	0.789793439
3	Don't know	100	12.2%	0.121506683
97	No answer	7	0.9%	0.008505468
98	Not asked	5474		NA

r4dv46a_3

Variable label:	Lower priority of health care: Smoking
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Smoking
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	209	25.4%	0.25394897
2	No	526	63.9%	0.63912515
3	Don't know	77	9.4%	0.09356015
97	No answer	11	1.3%	0.01336574
98	Not asked	5474		NA

r4dv46a_4

Variable label:	Lower priority of health care: High alcohol consumption
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	High alcohol consumption
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	199	24.2%	0.24179830
2	No	523	63.5%	0.63547995
3	Don't know	91	11.1%	0.11057108
97	No answer	10	1.2%	0.01215067
98	Not asked	5474		NA

r4dv46a_5

Variable label:	Lower priority of health care: Abuse of medication/drugs
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Abuse of medication/drugs
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	221	26.9%	0.26852977
2	No	492	59.8%	0.59781288
3	Don't know	99	12.0%	0.12029162
97	No answer	11	1.3%	0.01336574
98	Not asked	5474		NA

r4dv46a_6

Variable label:	Lower priority of health care: Lack of physical activity
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Lack of physical activity
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	92	11.2%	0.1117861
2	No	626	76.1%	0.7606318
3	Don't know	93	11.3%	0.1130012
97	No answer	12	1.5%	0.0145808
98	Not asked	5474		NA

r4dv46a_7

Variable label:	Lower priority of health care: Hazardous sports which result in illness of injury
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Hazardous sports which result in illness of injury
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	202	24.5%	0.2454435
2	No	479	58.2%	0.5820170
3	Don't know	130	15.8%	0.1579587
97	No answer	12	1.5%	0.0145808
98	Not asked	5474		NA

r4dv46a_8

Variable label:	Lower priority of health care: Poor diet
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Poor diet
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	67	8.1%	0.08140948
2	No	631	76.7%	0.76670717
3	Don't know	114	13.9%	0.13851762
97	No answer	11	1.3%	0.01336574
98	Not asked	5474		NA

r4dv46a_9

Variable label:	Lower priority of health care: A combination of these
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	A combination of these
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	112	13.6%	0.13608748
2	No	533	64.8%	0.64763062
3	Don't know	167	20.3%	0.20291616
97	No answer	11	1.3%	0.01336574
98	Not asked	5474		NA

r4dv46a_10

Variable label:	Lower priority of health care: Failure to comply with an agreement about changing one’s lifestyle
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Failure to comply with an agreement about changing one’s lifestyle
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	256	31.1%	0.31105711
2	No	404	49.1%	0.49088700
3	Don't know	153	18.6%	0.18590522
97	No answer	10	1.2%	0.01215067
98	Not asked	5474		NA

r4dv46b_1

Variable label:	Lower priority of personal health care: Overweight/obesity
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Overweight/obesity
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	121	16.2%	0.16241611
2	No	509	68.3%	0.68322148
3	Don't know	101	13.6%	0.13557047
97	No answer	14	1.9%	0.01879195
98	Not asked	5552		NA

r4dv46b_2

Variable label:	Lower priority of personal health care: Smoking
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Smoking
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	243	32.6%	0.32617450
2	No	411	55.2%	0.55167785
3	Don't know	79	10.6%	0.10604027
97	No answer	12	1.6%	0.01610738
98	Not asked	5552		NA

r4dv46b_3

Variable label:	Lower priority of personal health care: High alcohol consumption
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	High alcohol consumption
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	238	31.9%	0.31946309
2	No	411	55.2%	0.55167785
3	Don't know	83	11.1%	0.11140940
97	No answer	13	1.7%	0.01744966
98	Not asked	5552		NA

r4dv46b_4

Variable label:	Lower priority of personal health care: Abuse of medication/drugs
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Abuse of medication/drugs
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	239	32.1%	0.32080537
2	No	397	53.3%	0.53288591
3	Don't know	96	12.9%	0.12885906
97	No answer	13	1.7%	0.01744966
98	Not asked	5552		NA

r4dv46b_5

Variable label:	Lower priority of personal health care: Lack of physical activity
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Lack of physical activity
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	123	16.5%	0.16510067
2	No	522	70.1%	0.70067114
3	Don't know	86	11.5%	0.11543624
97	No answer	14	1.9%	0.01879195
98	Not asked	5552		NA

r4dv46b_6

Variable label:	Lower priority of personal health care: Hazardous sports which result in illness of injury
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Hazardous sports which result in illness of injury
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	198	26.6%	0.26577181
2	No	425	57.0%	0.57046980
3	Don't know	107	14.4%	0.14362416
97	No answer	15	2.0%	0.02013423
98	Not asked	5552		NA

r4dv46b_7

Variable label:	Lower priority of personal health care: Poor diet
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Poor diet
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	115	15.4%	0.15436242
2	No	524	70.3%	0.70335570
3	Don't know	90	12.1%	0.12080537
97	No answer	16	2.1%	0.02147651
98	Not asked	5552		NA

r4dv46b_8

Variable label:	Lower priority of personal health care: A combination of these
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	A combination of these
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	165	22.1%	0.22147651
2	No	436	58.5%	0.58523490
3	Don't know	115	15.4%	0.15436242
97	No answer	29	3.9%	0.03892617
98	Not asked	5552		NA

r4dv46b_9

Variable label:	Lower priority of personal health care: Failure to comply with an agreement about changing one’s lifestyle
Pre-question text:	Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
Literal question:	Failure to comply with an agreement about changing one’s lifestyle
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	260	34.9%	0.34899329
2	No	349	46.8%	0.46845638
3	Don't know	122	16.4%	0.16375839
97	No answer	14	1.9%	0.01879195
98	Not asked	5552		NA

r4ran24

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1565] [Invalid:4732] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	342	21.9%	0.2185304
2	2	391	25.0%	0.2498403
3	3	404	25.8%	0.2581470
4	4	428	27.3%	0.2734824
Sysmiss		4732		NA

r4dv55a

Variable label:	Allow religious schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that it should be possible to send one’s children to religious schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran24=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	14	4.1%	0.040935673
2	Agree	73	21.3%	0.213450292
3	Agree somewhat	52	15.2%	0.152046784
4	Neither agree nor disagree	70	20.5%	0.204678363
5	Disagree somewhat	31	9.1%	0.090643275
6	Disagree	55	16.1%	0.160818713
7	Strongly disagree	46	13.5%	0.134502924
97	No answer	1	0.3%	0.002923977
98	Not asked	5955		NA

r4dv55b

Variable label:	Allow Christian schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that it should be possible to send one’s children to Christian schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran24=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	47	12.0%	0.12020460
2	Agree	110	28.1%	0.28132992
3	Agree somewhat	65	16.6%	0.16624041
4	Neither agree nor disagree	75	19.2%	0.19181586
5	Disagree somewhat	28	7.2%	0.07161125
6	Disagree	33	8.4%	0.08439898
7	Strongly disagree	29	7.4%	0.07416880
97	No answer	4	1.0%	0.01023018
98	Not asked	5906		NA

r4dv55c

Variable label:	Allow Muslim schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that it should be possible to send one’s children to Muslim schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran24=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	12	3.0%	0.02970297
2	Agree	61	15.1%	0.15099010
3	Agree somewhat	59	14.6%	0.14603960
4	Neither agree nor disagree	75	18.6%	0.18564356
5	Disagree somewhat	36	8.9%	0.08910891
6	Disagree	79	19.6%	0.19554455
7	Strongly disagree	78	19.3%	0.19306931
97	No answer	4	1.0%	0.00990099
98	Not asked	5893		NA

r4dv55d

Variable label:	Allow private schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that it should be possible to send one’s children to private schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran24=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	79	18.5%	0.184579439
2	Agree	125	29.2%	0.292056075
3	Agree somewhat	64	15.0%	0.149532710
4	Neither agree nor disagree	54	12.6%	0.126168224
5	Disagree somewhat	48	11.2%	0.112149533
6	Disagree	36	8.4%	0.084112150
7	Strongly disagree	21	4.9%	0.049065421
97	No answer	1	0.2%	0.002336449
98	Not asked	5869		NA

r4ran25

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1564] [Invalid:4733] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	539	34.5%	0.3446292
2	2	514	32.9%	0.3286445
3	3	511	32.7%	0.3267263
Sysmiss		4733		NA

r4dv56a

Variable label:	Do you think that begging should be made illegal?
Literal question:	Do you think that begging should be made illegal?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran25=1. Respondents are not exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	236	43.8%	0.437847866
2	No	196	36.4%	0.363636364
3	Don't know	106	19.7%	0.196660482
97	No answer	1	0.2%	0.001855288
98	Not asked	5758		NA

r4dv56b

Variable label:	Picture of beggar: Do you think that begging should be made illegal?
Pre-question text:	Here is a picture of someone begging.
Literal question:	Do you think that begging should be made illegal?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran25=2. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	233	45.3%	0.453307393
2	No	185	36.0%	0.359922179
3	Don't know	95	18.5%	0.184824903
97	No answer	1	0.2%	0.001945525
98	Not asked	5783		NA

r4dv56c

Variable label:	Picture of beggar: Do you think that begging should be made illegal?
Pre-question text:	Here is a picture of someone begging.
Literal question:	Do you think that begging should be made illegal?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran25=3. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	230	45.0%	0.450097847
2	No	176	34.4%	0.344422701
3	Don't know	103	20.2%	0.201565558
97	No answer	2	0.4%	0.003913894
98	Not asked	5786		NA

r4ran45

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1564] [Invalid:4733] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	540	34.5%	0.3452685
2	2	508	32.5%	0.3248082
3	3	516	33.0%	0.3299233
Sysmiss		4733		NA

r4dv35a_1

Variable label:	Description: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants.
Pre-question text:	How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question:	It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran45=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	91	16.9%	0.168518519
2	Good	192	35.6%	0.355555556
3	Somewhat good	105	19.4%	0.194444444
4	Neither good nor bad	107	19.8%	0.198148148
5	Somewhat bad	24	4.4%	0.044444444
6	Bad	10	1.9%	0.018518519
7	Very bad	6	1.1%	0.011111111
97	No answer	5	0.9%	0.009259259
98	Not asked	5757		NA

r4dv35a_2

Variable label:	Description: I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
Pre-question text:	How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question:	I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran45=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	39	7.2%	0.072222222
2	Good	84	15.6%	0.155555556
3	Somewhat good	102	18.9%	0.188888889
4	Neither good nor bad	176	32.6%	0.325925926
5	Somewhat bad	32	5.9%	0.059259259
6	Bad	63	11.7%	0.116666667
7	Very bad	39	7.2%	0.072222222
97	No answer	5	0.9%	0.009259259
98	Not asked	5757		NA

r4dv35a_3

Variable label:	Description: I try to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants due to my own convictions.
Pre-question text:	How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question:	I try to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants due to my own convictions.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran45=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	88	16.3%	0.162962963
2	Good	197	36.5%	0.364814815
3	Somewhat good	113	20.9%	0.209259259
4	Neither good nor bad	102	18.9%	0.188888889
5	Somewhat bad	21	3.9%	0.038888889
6	Bad	11	2.0%	0.020370370
7	Very bad	5	0.9%	0.009259259
97	No answer	3	0.6%	0.005555556
98	Not asked	5757		NA

r4dv35a_4

Variable label:	Description: I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
Pre-question text:	How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question:	I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran45=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	105	19.4%	0.194444444
2	Good	191	35.4%	0.353703704
3	Somewhat good	82	15.2%	0.151851852
4	Neither good nor bad	98	18.1%	0.181481481
5	Somewhat bad	30	5.6%	0.055555556
6	Bad	21	3.9%	0.038888889
7	Very bad	9	1.7%	0.016666667
97	No answer	4	0.7%	0.007407407
98	Not asked	5757		NA

r4dv35b_1

Variable label:	Description: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to Roma people.
Pre-question text:	How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question:	It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to Roma people.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran45=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	45	8.9%	0.08858268
2	Good	123	24.2%	0.24212598
3	Somewhat good	93	18.3%	0.18307087
4	Neither good nor bad	136	26.8%	0.26771654
5	Somewhat bad	49	9.6%	0.09645669
6	Bad	36	7.1%	0.07086614
7	Very bad	17	3.3%	0.03346457
97	No answer	9	1.8%	0.01771654
98	Not asked	5789		NA

r4dv35b_2

Variable label:	Description: I feel guilty if I think negatively about Roma people.
Pre-question text:	How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question:	I feel guilty if I think negatively about Roma people.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran45=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	33	6.5%	0.06496063
2	Good	80	15.7%	0.15748031
3	Somewhat good	81	15.9%	0.15944882
4	Neither good nor bad	143	28.1%	0.28149606
5	Somewhat bad	50	9.8%	0.09842520
6	Bad	70	13.8%	0.13779528
7	Very bad	42	8.3%	0.08267717
97	No answer	9	1.8%	0.01771654
98	Not asked	5789		NA

r4dv35b_3

Variable label:	Description: I try to be unprejudiced in regard to Roma people due to my own convictions.
Pre-question text:	How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question:	I try to be unprejudiced in regard to Roma people due to my own convictions.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran45=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	38	7.5%	0.07480315
2	Good	127	25.0%	0.25000000
3	Somewhat good	100	19.7%	0.19685039
4	Neither good nor bad	129	25.4%	0.25393701
5	Somewhat bad	55	10.8%	0.10826772
6	Bad	31	6.1%	0.06102362
7	Very bad	17	3.3%	0.03346457
97	No answer	11	2.2%	0.02165354
98	Not asked	5789		NA

r4dv35b_4

Variable label:	Description: I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
Pre-question text:	How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question:	I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran45=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	92	18.1%	0.18110236
2	Good	160	31.5%	0.31496063
3	Somewhat good	88	17.3%	0.17322835
4	Neither good nor bad	107	21.1%	0.21062992
5	Somewhat bad	26	5.1%	0.05118110
6	Bad	16	3.1%	0.03149606
7	Very bad	10	2.0%	0.01968504
97	No answer	9	1.8%	0.01771654
98	Not asked	5789		NA

r4dv35c_1

Variable label:	Description: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to Muslims.
Pre-question text:	How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question:	It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to Muslims.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran45=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	67	13.0%	0.12984496
2	Good	166	32.2%	0.32170543
3	Somewhat good	86	16.7%	0.16666667
4	Neither good nor bad	121	23.4%	0.23449612
5	Somewhat bad	29	5.6%	0.05620155
6	Bad	25	4.8%	0.04844961
7	Very bad	15	2.9%	0.02906977
97	No answer	7	1.4%	0.01356589
98	Not asked	5781		NA

r4dv35c_2

Variable label:	Description: I feel guilty if I think negatively about Muslims.
Pre-question text:	How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question:	I feel guilty if I think negatively about Muslims.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran45=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	19	3.7%	0.03682171
2	Good	66	12.8%	0.12790698
3	Somewhat good	67	13.0%	0.12984496
4	Neither good nor bad	160	31.0%	0.31007752
5	Somewhat bad	55	10.7%	0.10658915
6	Bad	83	16.1%	0.16085271
7	Very bad	60	11.6%	0.11627907
97	No answer	6	1.2%	0.01162791
98	Not asked	5781		NA

r4dv35c_3

Variable label:	Description: I try to be unprejudiced in regard to Muslims due to my own convictions.
Pre-question text:	How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question:	I try to be unprejudiced in regard to Muslims due to my own convictions.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran45=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	54	10.5%	0.104651163
2	Good	166	32.2%	0.321705426
3	Somewhat good	97	18.8%	0.187984496
4	Neither good nor bad	137	26.6%	0.265503876
5	Somewhat bad	24	4.7%	0.046511628
6	Bad	15	2.9%	0.029069767
7	Very bad	19	3.7%	0.036821705
97	No answer	4	0.8%	0.007751938
98	Not asked	5781		NA

r4dv35c_4

Variable label:	Description: I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
Pre-question text:	How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question:	I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=4 and ran45=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	80	15.5%	0.155038760
2	Good	175	33.9%	0.339147287
3	Somewhat good	84	16.3%	0.162790698
4	Neither good nor bad	102	19.8%	0.197674419
5	Somewhat bad	38	7.4%	0.073643411
6	Bad	17	3.3%	0.032945736
7	Very bad	15	2.9%	0.029069767
97	No answer	5	1.0%	0.009689922
98	Not asked	5781		NA

r4dv40

Variable label:	Most important measure for preventing or punishing foreign fighters
Literal question:	In order to prevent Norwegians from participating in war on behalf of other countries some people think that it is important to have stricter penalties for foreign fighters. Others think that it is important to prevent radicalisation at an early stage. What do you think is most important?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Stricter penalties	369	5.9%	0.05859933
2	Prevention	1103	17.5%	0.17516278
3	Neither of these	74	1.2%	0.01175163
97	No answer	4751	75.4%	0.75448626
98	Not asked	0		NA

r4ran26

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1564] [Invalid:4733] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	509	32.5%	0.3254476
2	2	567	36.3%	0.3625320
3	3	488	31.2%	0.3120205
Sysmiss		4733		NA

r4oc24a

Variable label:	Statement: The government should introduce measures designed to reduce income disparity.
Pre-question text:	Please read the following statement and insert a tick to show the extent to which you agree or disagree with it.
Literal question:	The government should introduce measures designed to reduce income disparity.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=0 and ran26=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	100	19.6%	0.196463654
2	Agree	200	39.3%	0.392927308
3	Neither agree nor disagree	116	22.8%	0.227897839
4	Disagree	74	14.5%	0.145383104
5	Strongly disagree	18	3.5%	0.035363458
97	No answer	1	0.2%	0.001964637
98	Not asked	5788		NA

r4oc24b

Variable label:	Statement: The government should not introduce measures designed to reduce income disparity.
Pre-question text:	Please read the following statement and insert a tick to show the extent to which you agree or disagree with it.
Literal question:	The government should not introduce measures designed to reduce income disparity.
Technical description:	[Asked if U=0 and ran26=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	25	4.4%	0.04409171
2	Agree	97	17.1%	0.17107584
3	Neither agree nor disagree	100	17.6%	0.17636684
4	Disagree	234	41.3%	0.41269841
5	Strongly disagree	105	18.5%	0.18518519
97	No answer	6	1.1%	0.01058201
98	Not asked	5730		NA

r4oc24c

Variable label:	Do you think that the government should or should not introduce measures designed to reduce income disparity?
Literal question:	Do you think that the government should or should not introduce measures designed to reduce income disparity?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=0 and ran26=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	It definitely should	151	30.9%	0.30942623
2	It probably should	156	32.0%	0.31967213
3	I do not have an opinion about this	71	14.5%	0.14549180
4	It probably should not	79	16.2%	0.16188525
5	It definitely should not	25	5.1%	0.05122951
97	No answer	6	1.2%	0.01229508
98	Not asked	5809		NA

r4km1

Variable label:	How concerned are you about climate change?
Literal question:	How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and or if the respondents answered r3KM23 in wave 3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very concerned	254	12.4%	0.12444880
2	Concerned	663	32.5%	0.32484076
3	Slightly concerned	697	34.1%	0.34149927
4	Not very concerned	321	15.7%	0.15727585
5	Not at all concerned	58	2.8%	0.02841744
97	No answer	48	2.4%	0.02351788
98	Not asked	4256		NA

r4km10

Variable label:	Global warming and consequences for the weather
Literal question:	If nothing is done to prevent it, do you believe global warming will lead to more harmful extreme weather over the next 100 years, or do you believe global warming will not lead to this?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and or if the respondent answered km2017 in wave 2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Global warming will lead to more harmful extreme weather	1774	85.0%	0.85002396
2	Global warming will not lead to more harmful extreme weather	229	11.0%	0.10972688
97	No answer	84	4.0%	0.04024916
98	Not asked	4210		NA

r4km11_1

Variable label:	Statement: Technological innovations will resolve our climate problems.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with them?
Literal question:	Technological innovations will resolve our climate problems.
Technical description:	[Asked if the respondent answered km41 in wave 3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	96	3.2%	0.03193613
2	Agree	401	13.3%	0.13339987
3	Agree somewhat	1178	39.2%	0.39188290
4	Neither agree nor disagree	624	20.8%	0.20758483
5	Disagree somewhat	357	11.9%	0.11876248
6	Disagree	243	8.1%	0.08083832
7	Strongly disagree	59	2.0%	0.01962741
97	No answer	48	1.6%	0.01596806
98	Not asked	3291		NA

r4km11_2

Variable label:	Statement: The citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption as part of the solution to the challenging climate changes facing us.
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with them?
Literal question:	The citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption as part of the solution to the challenging climate changes facing us.
Technical description:	[Asked if the respondent answered km41 in wave 3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	504	16.8%	0.16766467
2	Agree	981	32.6%	0.32634731
3	Agree somewhat	872	29.0%	0.29008649
4	Neither agree nor disagree	275	9.1%	0.09148370
5	Disagree somewhat	151	5.0%	0.05023287
6	Disagree	133	4.4%	0.04424484
7	Strongly disagree	54	1.8%	0.01796407
97	No answer	36	1.2%	0.01197605
98	Not asked	3291		NA

r4oc2

Variable label:	View on climate change
Literal question:	Based on what you know, which of the following statements best describes your views on climate change?
Technical description:	Choose one option. [Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	I believe that the climate is not changing.	12	0.4%	0.004465947
2	I don't know whether the climate is changing or not.	169	6.3%	0.062895422
3	I think that the climate is changing, but that it has only been slightly affected by humans.	668	24.9%	0.248604392
4	I think that the climate is changing, mainly as a result of human influences.	1793	66.7%	0.667286937
97	No answer	45	1.7%	0.016747302
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc3

Variable label:	Winter (2014-15): warmer, colder or normal?
Literal question:	Has the winter (2014-15) where you live been warmer than normal, colder than normal, or normal?
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Colder	29	1.1%	0.01079271
2	Normal	553	20.6%	0.20580573
3	Warmer	2071	77.1%	0.77074805
97	No answer	34	1.3%	0.01265352
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc4

Variable label:	Winter (2013–14): warmer, colder or normal?
Literal question:	When you consider the previous winter (2013-14), was it warmer than normal, colder than normal, or normal where you live?
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Colder	299	11.1%	0.11127652
2	No different	1015	37.8%	0.37774470
3	Warmer	1306	48.6%	0.48604392
97	No answer	67	2.5%	0.02493487
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc5

Variable label:	Winter (2014–15): More or less precipitation?
Literal question:	Was there more precipitation, less precipitation or normal precipitation this winter (2014-15) where you live?
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Less precipitation	717	26.7%	0.2668403
2	Normal	1056	39.3%	0.3930033
3	More precipitation	853	31.7%	0.3174544
97	No answer	61	2.3%	0.0227019
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc6

Variable label:	Winter (2013–14): More or less precipitation?
Literal question:	When you consider the previous winter (2013-14), was there more precipitation, less precipitation or normal precipitation where you live?
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Less precipitation	629	23.4%	0.23409006
2	Normal	1319	49.1%	0.49088202
3	More precipitation	664	24.7%	0.24711574
97	No answer	75	2.8%	0.02791217
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc7_1

Variable label:	Experienced extreme weather: Extreme snow storm
Pre-question text:	Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
Literal question:	Extreme snow storm
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	206	7.7%	0.07666543
2	No	2179	81.1%	0.81094157
97	No answer	302	11.2%	0.11239300
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc7_2

Variable label:	Experienced extreme weather: Extreme cold
Pre-question text:	Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
Literal question:	Extreme cold
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	122	4.5%	0.0454038
2	No	2250	83.7%	0.8373651
97	No answer	315	11.7%	0.1172311
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc7_3

Variable label:	Experienced extreme weather: Extreme high winds
Pre-question text:	Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
Literal question:	Extreme high winds
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	1463	54.4%	0.54447339
2	No	1097	40.8%	0.40826200
97	No answer	127	4.7%	0.04726461
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc7_4

Variable label:	Experienced extreme weather: Extreme rainstorm
Pre-question text:	Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
Literal question:	Extreme rainstorm
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	1144	42.6%	0.42575363
2	No	1361	50.7%	0.50651284
97	No answer	182	6.8%	0.06773353
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc7_5

Variable label:	Experienced extreme weather: Extreme heat wave
Pre-question text:	Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
Literal question:	Extreme heat wave
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	544	20.2%	0.2024563
2	No	1862	69.3%	0.6929661
97	No answer	281	10.5%	0.1045776
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc7_6

Variable label:	Experienced extreme weather: Flood
Pre-question text:	Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
Literal question:	Flood
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	339	12.6%	0.1261630
2	No	2043	76.0%	0.7603275
97	No answer	305	11.4%	0.1135095
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc7_7

Variable label:	Experienced extreme weather: Wildfire
Pre-question text:	Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
Literal question:	Wildfire
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	67	2.5%	0.02493487
2	No	2291	85.3%	0.85262374
97	No answer	329	12.2%	0.12244138
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc7_8

Variable label:	Experienced extreme weather: Drought
Pre-question text:	Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
Literal question:	Drought
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	343	12.8%	0.1276517
2	No	2036	75.8%	0.7577224
97	No answer	308	11.5%	0.1146260
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc7_9

Variable label:	Experienced extreme weather: Other unusual weather
Pre-question text:	Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
Literal question:	Other unusual weather
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	157	5.8%	0.05842948
2	No	1364	50.8%	0.50762933
97	No answer	1166	43.4%	0.43394120
98	Not asked	3610		NA

r4oc7_9_other

Variable label:	Experienced extreme weather: Other unusual weather [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text:	Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
Literal question:	Other unusual weather
Technical description:	[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4ran6

Variable label:	[Randomizes if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1576] [Invalid:4721] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	800	50.8%	0.5076142
2	2	776	49.2%	0.4923858
Sysmiss		4721		NA

r4oc22a

Variable label:	Woman working with people, tired and depressed: Sick-leave fine?
Literal question:	Gunn is 40 years old. In her job she meets many people, but she also works quite a lot on a computer. When she visits her doctor she says that she feels tired and depressed. Do you think that it would be reasonable for Guun to be signed off sick for a couple of weeks?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes, definitely	20	2.5%	0.02500
2	Yes, probably	183	22.9%	0.22875
3	No, probably not	457	57.1%	0.57125
4	No, definitely not	136	17.0%	0.17000
97	No answer	4	0.5%	0.00500
98	Not asked	5497		NA

r4oc22b

Variable label:	Man working with computers, tired and depressed: Sick-leave fine?
Literal question:	Lars is 40 years old. In his job he meets many people, but he also works quite a lot on a computer. When he visits his doctor he says that he feels tired and depressed. Do you think that is would be reasonable for Lars to be signed off sick for a couple of weeks?
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes, definitely	24	3.1%	0.03092784
2	Yes, probably	186	24.0%	0.23969072
3	No, probably not	417	53.7%	0.53737113
4	No, definitely not	135	17.4%	0.17396907
97	No answer	14	1.8%	0.01804124
98	Not asked	5521		NA

r4oc23_1

Variable label:	Statement: People suffering from depression can pull themselves together if they want to
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
Literal question:	People suffering from depression can pull themselves together if they want to
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Very true	15	0.9%	0.009328358
2	2	98	6.1%	0.060945274
3	3	297	18.5%	0.184701493
4	4	558	34.7%	0.347014925
5	5 - Completely untrue	596	37.1%	0.370646766
97	No answer	44	2.7%	0.027363184
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4oc23_2

Variable label:	Statement: Depression is a sign of weakness
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
Literal question:	Depression is a sign of weakness
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Very true	15	0.9%	0.009328358
2	2	43	2.7%	0.026741294
3	3	111	6.9%	0.069029851
4	4	342	21.3%	0.212686567
5	5 - Completely untrue	1054	65.5%	0.655472637
97	No answer	43	2.7%	0.026741294
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4oc23_3

Variable label:	Statement: Depression is not a proper medical condition
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
Literal question:	Depression is not a proper medical condition
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Very true	42	2.6%	0.02611940
2	2	84	5.2%	0.05223881
3	3	186	11.6%	0.11567164
4	4	330	20.5%	0.20522388
5	5 - Completely untrue	918	57.1%	0.57089552
97	No answer	48	3.0%	0.02985075
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4oc23_4

Variable label:	Statement: People suffering from depression are dangerous
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
Literal question:	People suffering from depression are dangerous
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Very true	21	1.3%	0.01305970
2	2	71	4.4%	0.04415423
3	3	223	13.9%	0.13868159
4	4	431	26.8%	0.26803483
5	5 - Completely untrue	816	50.7%	0.50746269
97	No answer	46	2.9%	0.02860697
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4oc23_5

Variable label:	Statement: It is best to avoid people who are suffering from depression
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
Literal question:	It is best to avoid people who are suffering from depression in order to prevent oneself from becoming depressed too
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Very true	9	0.6%	0.005597015
2	2	44	2.7%	0.027363184
3	3	114	7.1%	0.070895522
4	4	362	22.5%	0.225124378
5	5 - Completely untrue	1037	64.5%	0.644900498
97	No answer	42	2.6%	0.026119403
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4oc23_6

Variable label:	Statement: People suffering from depression are unpredictable
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
Literal question:	People suffering from depression are unpredictable
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Very true	30	1.9%	0.01865672
2	2	197	12.3%	0.12251244
3	3	423	26.3%	0.26305970
4	4	520	32.3%	0.32338308
5	5 - Completely untrue	390	24.3%	0.24253731
97	No answer	48	3.0%	0.02985075
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4oc23_7

Variable label:	Statement: If I was suffering from depression I would not tell anyone
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
Literal question:	If I was suffering from depression I would not tell anyone
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Very true	66	4.1%	0.04104478
2	2	251	15.6%	0.15609453
3	3	327	20.3%	0.20335821
4	4	442	27.5%	0.27487562
5	5 - Completely untrue	476	29.6%	0.29601990
97	No answer	46	2.9%	0.02860697
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4oc23_8

Variable label:	Statement: I would not employ anyone who I knew had been depressed
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
Literal question:	I would not employ anyone who I knew had been depressed
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Very true	54	3.4%	0.03358209
2	2	131	8.1%	0.08146766
3	3	326	20.3%	0.20273632
4	4	442	27.5%	0.27487562
5	5 - Completely untrue	609	37.9%	0.37873134
97	No answer	46	2.9%	0.02860697
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4oc23_9

Variable label:	Statement: I would not vote for a politician who I knew had been depressed
Pre-question text:	To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
Literal question:	I would not vote for a politician who I knew had been depressed
Technical description:	[Asked if U=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 - Very true	56	3.5%	0.03482587
2	2	79	4.9%	0.04912935
3	3	193	12.0%	0.12002488
4	4	393	24.4%	0.24440299
5	5 - Completely untrue	838	52.1%	0.52114428
97	No answer	49	3.0%	0.03047264
98	Not asked	4689		NA

r4mobil_bw

Variable label:	[Selecting non-mobile users for Bandwagon experiment (PAD2 and PAD6)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6206] [Invalid:91] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	Non-mobile	4992	80.4%	0.8043829
1	Mobile	1214	19.6%	0.1956171
Sysmiss		91		NA

r4ran30

Variable label:	[Randomizes non-mobile users to either PAD2 or PAD6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4992] [Invalid:1305] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	2534	50.8%	0.5076122
2	2	2458	49.2%	0.4923878
Sysmiss		1305		NA

r4qcount_1

Variable label:	[Stores aggregated distribution for each groups defined in BW_groupsPAD2. Stores if ran30=1Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4bw_groupspad2

Variable label:	[Allocates respondents in groups. First 15 respondents gets the value 0. Subsequent respondents are chronologically defined in groups of 425. Defines groups if ran30=1.Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2534] [Invalid:3763] [Range:0-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	Group 0	15	0.6%	0.005919495
1	Group 1	426	16.8%	0.168113654
2	Group 2	422	16.7%	0.166535122
3	Group 3	426	16.8%	0.168113654
4	Group 4	424	16.7%	0.167324388
5	Group 5	423	16.7%	0.166929755
6	Group 6	398	15.7%	0.157063931
7	Group 7	0	0.0%	0.000000000
Sysmiss		3763		NA

r4pad2start

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=0. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:15] [Invalid:6282] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	7	46.7%	0.46666667
2	Agree	3	20.0%	0.20000000
3	Agree somewhat	3	20.0%	0.20000000
4	Neither agree nor disagree	1	6.7%	0.06666667
5	Disagree somewhat	0	0.0%	0.00000000
6	Disagree	1	6.7%	0.06666667
7	Strongly disagree	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6282		NA

r4pad2start_recode

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD2start. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=0. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:14] [Invalid:6283] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	1	7.1%	0.07142857
2	Agree	13	92.9%	0.92857143
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6283		NA

r4bw_ran1

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:426] [Invalid:5871] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	191	44.8%	0.4483568
2	2	235	55.2%	0.5516432
Sysmiss		5871		NA

r4pad2a1

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=1 and BW_ran1=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:190] [Invalid:6107] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	82	43.2%	0.43157895
2	Agree	61	32.1%	0.32105263
3	Agree somewhat	22	11.6%	0.11578947
4	Neither agree nor disagree	8	4.2%	0.04210526
5	Disagree somewhat	10	5.3%	0.05263158
6	Disagree	3	1.6%	0.01578947
7	Strongly disagree	4	2.1%	0.02105263
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6107		NA

r4pad2a2

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=1 and BW_ran1=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:235] [Invalid:6062] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	93	39.6%	0.39574468
2	Agree	75	31.9%	0.31914894
3	Agree somewhat	22	9.4%	0.09361702
4	Neither agree nor disagree	18	7.7%	0.07659574
5	Disagree somewhat	3	1.3%	0.01276596
6	Disagree	13	5.5%	0.05531915
7	Strongly disagree	11	4.7%	0.04680851
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6062		NA

r4pad2a1_recode

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD2A1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:182] [Invalid:6115] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	17	9.3%	0.09340659
2	Agree	165	90.7%	0.90659341
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6115		NA

r4bw_ran2

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:422] [Invalid:5875] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	216	51.2%	0.5118483
2	2	206	48.8%	0.4881517
Sysmiss		5875		NA

r4pad2b1

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=2 and BW_ran2=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:216] [Invalid:6081] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	99	45.8%	0.45833333
2	Agree	66	30.6%	0.30555556
3	Agree somewhat	24	11.1%	0.11111111
4	Neither agree nor disagree	8	3.7%	0.03703704
5	Disagree somewhat	10	4.6%	0.04629630
6	Disagree	8	3.7%	0.03703704
7	Strongly disagree	1	0.5%	0.00462963
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6081		NA

r4pad2b2

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=2 and BW_ran2=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:205] [Invalid:6092] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	78	38.0%	0.38048780
2	Agree	70	34.1%	0.34146341
3	Agree somewhat	29	14.1%	0.14146341
4	Neither agree nor disagree	11	5.4%	0.05365854
5	Disagree somewhat	8	3.9%	0.03902439
6	Disagree	5	2.4%	0.02439024
7	Strongly disagree	4	2.0%	0.01951220
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6092		NA

r4pad2b1_recode

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD2B1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:208] [Invalid:6089] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	19	9.1%	0.09134615
2	Agree	189	90.9%	0.90865385
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6089		NA

r4bw_ran3

Variable label:	Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=3. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:426] [Invalid:5871] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	219	51.4%	0.5140845
2	2	207	48.6%	0.4859155
Sysmiss		5871		NA

r4pad2c1

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=3 and BW_ran3=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:216] [Invalid:6081] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	96	44.4%	0.44444444
2	Agree	60	27.8%	0.27777778
3	Agree somewhat	33	15.3%	0.15277778
4	Neither agree nor disagree	8	3.7%	0.03703704
5	Disagree somewhat	8	3.7%	0.03703704
6	Disagree	6	2.8%	0.02777778
7	Strongly disagree	5	2.3%	0.02314815
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6081		NA

r4pad2c2

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=3 and BW_ran3=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:207] [Invalid:6090] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	84	40.6%	0.405797101
2	Agree	70	33.8%	0.338164251
3	Agree somewhat	24	11.6%	0.115942029
4	Neither agree nor disagree	13	6.3%	0.062801932
5	Disagree somewhat	7	3.4%	0.033816425
6	Disagree	7	3.4%	0.033816425
7	Strongly disagree	2	1.0%	0.009661836
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.000000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6090		NA

r4pad2c1_recode

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD2C1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=3. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:208] [Invalid:6089] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	19	9.1%	0.09134615
2	Agree	189	90.9%	0.90865385
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6089		NA

r4bw_ran4

Variable label:	Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=4. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:424] [Invalid:5873] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	197	46.5%	0.4646226
2	2	227	53.5%	0.5353774
Sysmiss		5873		NA

r4pad2d1

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=4 and BW_ran4=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:197] [Invalid:6100] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	88	44.7%	0.446700508
2	Agree	65	33.0%	0.329949239
3	Agree somewhat	19	9.6%	0.096446701
4	Neither agree nor disagree	14	7.1%	0.071065990
5	Disagree somewhat	7	3.6%	0.035532995
6	Disagree	3	1.5%	0.015228426
7	Strongly disagree	1	0.5%	0.005076142
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.000000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6100		NA

r4pad2d2

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=4 and BW_ran4=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:226] [Invalid:6071] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	89	39.4%	0.39380531
2	Agree	73	32.3%	0.32300885
3	Agree somewhat	31	13.7%	0.13716814
4	Neither agree nor disagree	13	5.8%	0.05752212
5	Disagree somewhat	5	2.2%	0.02212389
6	Disagree	8	3.5%	0.03539823
7	Strongly disagree	7	3.1%	0.03097345
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6071		NA

r4pad2d1_recode

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD2D1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=4. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:183] [Invalid:6114] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	11	6.0%	0.06010929
2	Agree	172	94.0%	0.93989071
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6114		NA

r4bw_ran5

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=5. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:423] [Invalid:5874] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	192	45.4%	0.4539007
2	2	231	54.6%	0.5460993
Sysmiss		5874		NA

r4pad2e1

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=5 and BW_ran5=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:192] [Invalid:6105] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	74	38.5%	0.38541667
2	Agree	68	35.4%	0.35416667
3	Agree somewhat	20	10.4%	0.10416667
4	Neither agree nor disagree	11	5.7%	0.05729167
5	Disagree somewhat	8	4.2%	0.04166667
6	Disagree	8	4.2%	0.04166667
7	Strongly disagree	3	1.6%	0.01562500
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6105		NA

r4pad2e2

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=5 and BW_ran5=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:231] [Invalid:6066] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	96	41.6%	0.41558442
2	Agree	70	30.3%	0.30303030
3	Agree somewhat	21	9.1%	0.09090909
4	Neither agree nor disagree	26	11.3%	0.11255411
5	Disagree somewhat	5	2.2%	0.02164502
6	Disagree	9	3.9%	0.03896104
7	Strongly disagree	4	1.7%	0.01731602
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6066		NA

r4pad2e1_recode

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD2E1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=5. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:181] [Invalid:6116] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	19	10.5%	0.1049724
2	Agree	162	89.5%	0.8950276
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6116		NA

r4bw_ran6

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=6. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:398] [Invalid:5899] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	194	48.7%	0.4874372
2	2	204	51.3%	0.5125628
Sysmiss		5899		NA

r4pad2f1

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=6 and BW_ran6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:192] [Invalid:6105] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	77	40.1%	0.401041667
2	Agree	64	33.3%	0.333333333
3	Agree somewhat	23	12.0%	0.119791667
4	Neither agree nor disagree	16	8.3%	0.083333333
5	Disagree somewhat	6	3.1%	0.031250000
6	Disagree	5	2.6%	0.026041667
7	Strongly disagree	1	0.5%	0.005208333
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.000000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6105		NA

r4pad2f2

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=6 and BW_ran6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:201] [Invalid:6096] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	87	43.3%	0.43283582
2	Agree	53	26.4%	0.26368159
3	Agree somewhat	29	14.4%	0.14427861
4	Neither agree nor disagree	11	5.5%	0.05472637
5	Disagree somewhat	7	3.5%	0.03482587
6	Disagree	7	3.5%	0.03482587
7	Strongly disagree	7	3.5%	0.03482587
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6096		NA

r4pad2f1_recode

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD2F1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=6. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:176] [Invalid:6121] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	12	6.8%	0.06818182
2	Agree	164	93.2%	0.93181818
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6121		NA

r4bw_ran7

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=7. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]

r4pad2g1

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=7 and BW_ran7=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]

r4pad2g2

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=7 and BW_ran7=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]

r4pad2g1_recode

Variable label:	Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
Literal question:	The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD2G1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=7. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]

r4pad3

Variable label:	How strong is your opinion on the vaccine issue?
Literal question:	How strong are your views about this question?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2504] [Invalid:3793] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strong	553	22.1%	0.22084665
2	Strong	934	37.3%	0.37300319
3	Fairly strong	669	26.7%	0.26717252
4	Weak	236	9.4%	0.09424920
5	I do not have an opinion about this	112	4.5%	0.04472843
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		3793		NA

r4pad4

Variable label:	How good do you feel that your knowledge about the vaccine-topic is?
Literal question:	How good do you feel that your knowledge about this subject is?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2481] [Invalid:3816] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	240	9.7%	0.09673519
2	Good	969	39.1%	0.39056832
3	Some knowledge	968	39.0%	0.39016526
4	Not much knowledge	264	10.6%	0.10640871
5	No knowledge at all	40	1.6%	0.01612253
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		3816		NA

r4pad5

Variable label:	Estimates of Norwegians attitude mandatory vaccinations
Literal question:	If you had to make a guess, how many citizens in Norway do you think would agree that it should be compulsory for all children to be vaccinated against measles.
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2504] [Invalid:3793] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Almost everyone	697	27.8%	0.27835463
2	Around 2 out of 3	1187	47.4%	0.47404153
3	Around half	408	16.3%	0.16293930
4	Around 1 out of 3	167	6.7%	0.06669329
5	Almost no-one	45	1.8%	0.01797125
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		3793		NA

r4qcount2_1

Variable label:	[Stores aggregated distribution for each groups defined in BW_groupsPAD6. Stores if ran30=2Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4bw_groupspad6

Variable label:	[Allocates respondents in groups. First 15 respondents gets the value 0. Subsequent respondents are chronologically defined in groups of 425. Defines groups if ran30=1.Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical description:	[Allokerer respondenter inn i grupper. Første 15 får verdien 0. Påfølgende respondenter kronologisk definert i grupper på 425. Definerer grupper dersom ran30=1.En del av Bogwagon eksperimentet. Se skjermbilde i appendiks]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2458] [Invalid:3839] [Range:0-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	Group 0	15	0.6%	0.006102522
1	Group 1	422	17.2%	0.171684296
2	Group 2	422	17.2%	0.171684296
3	Group 3	425	17.3%	0.172904801
4	Group 4	419	17.0%	0.170463792
5	Group 5	422	17.2%	0.171684296
6	Group 6	333	13.5%	0.135475997
7	Group 7	0	0.0%	0.000000000
Sysmiss		3839		NA

r4pad6start

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=0. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:15] [Invalid:6282] [Range:2-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	0	0.0%	0.00000000
2	Agree	2	13.3%	0.13333333
3	Agree somewhat	2	13.3%	0.13333333
4	Neither agree nor disagree	8	53.3%	0.53333333
5	Disagree somewhat	2	13.3%	0.13333333
6	Disagree	1	6.7%	0.06666667
7	Strongly disagree	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6282		NA

r4pad6start_recode

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD6start. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=0. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:7] [Invalid:6290] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	3	42.9%	0.4285714
2	Agree	4	57.1%	0.5714286
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6290		NA

r4bw_ran1pad6

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:422] [Invalid:5875] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	199	47.2%	0.471564
2	2	223	52.8%	0.528436
Sysmiss		5875		NA

r4pad6a1

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=1 and BW_ran1PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:199] [Invalid:6098] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	26	13.1%	0.13065327
2	Agree	45	22.6%	0.22613065
3	Agree somewhat	37	18.6%	0.18592965
4	Neither agree nor disagree	35	17.6%	0.17587940
5	Disagree somewhat	11	5.5%	0.05527638
6	Disagree	25	12.6%	0.12562814
7	Strongly disagree	20	10.1%	0.10050251
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6098		NA

r4pad6a2

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=1 and BW_ran1PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:221] [Invalid:6076] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	32	14.5%	0.14479638
2	Agree	29	13.1%	0.13122172
3	Agree somewhat	41	18.6%	0.18552036
4	Neither agree nor disagree	62	28.1%	0.28054299
5	Disagree somewhat	11	5.0%	0.04977376
6	Disagree	27	12.2%	0.12217195
7	Strongly disagree	19	8.6%	0.08597285
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6076		NA

r4pad6a1_recode

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD6A1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:164] [Invalid:6133] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	56	34.1%	0.3414634
2	Agree	108	65.9%	0.6585366
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6133		NA

r4bw_ran2pad6

Variable label:	[Randomiserer dersom ran30=2 og BW_groupsPAD6=2. En del av Bogwagon eksperimentet. Se skjermbilde i appendiks]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:422] [Invalid:5875] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	223	52.8%	0.528436
2	2	199	47.2%	0.471564
Sysmiss		5875		NA

r4pad6b1

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=2 and BW_ran2PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:221] [Invalid:6076] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	29	13.1%	0.13122172
2	Agree	36	16.3%	0.16289593
3	Agree somewhat	48	21.7%	0.21719457
4	Neither agree nor disagree	47	21.3%	0.21266968
5	Disagree somewhat	22	10.0%	0.09954751
6	Disagree	21	9.5%	0.09502262
7	Strongly disagree	18	8.1%	0.08144796
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6076		NA

r4pad6b2

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=2 and BW_ran2PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:196] [Invalid:6101] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	23	11.7%	0.11734694
2	Agree	39	19.9%	0.19897959
3	Agree somewhat	47	24.0%	0.23979592
4	Neither agree nor disagree	35	17.9%	0.17857143
5	Disagree somewhat	18	9.2%	0.09183673
6	Disagree	18	9.2%	0.09183673
7	Strongly disagree	16	8.2%	0.08163265
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6101		NA

r4pad6b1_recode

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD6B1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:174] [Invalid:6123] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	61	35.1%	0.3505747
2	Agree	113	64.9%	0.6494253
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6123		NA

r4bw_ran3pad6

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix][Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:425] [Invalid:5872] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	201	47.3%	0.4729412
2	2	224	52.7%	0.5270588
Sysmiss		5872		NA

r4pad6c1

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=3 and BW_ran3PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:199] [Invalid:6098] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	34	17.1%	0.17085427
2	Agree	26	13.1%	0.13065327
3	Agree somewhat	41	20.6%	0.20603015
4	Neither agree nor disagree	39	19.6%	0.19597990
5	Disagree somewhat	19	9.5%	0.09547739
6	Disagree	23	11.6%	0.11557789
7	Strongly disagree	17	8.5%	0.08542714
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6098		NA

r4pad6c2

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=3 and BW_ran3PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:220] [Invalid:6077] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	40	18.2%	0.18181818
2	Agree	41	18.6%	0.18636364
3	Agree somewhat	48	21.8%	0.21818182
4	Neither agree nor disagree	45	20.5%	0.20454545
5	Disagree somewhat	9	4.1%	0.04090909
6	Disagree	21	9.5%	0.09545455
7	Strongly disagree	16	7.3%	0.07272727
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6077		NA

r4pad6c1_recode

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD6C1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=3. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:160] [Invalid:6137] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	59	36.9%	0.36875
2	Agree	101	63.1%	0.63125
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6137		NA

r4bw_ran4pad6

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=4. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:419] [Invalid:5878] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	199	47.5%	0.4749403
2	2	220	52.5%	0.5250597
Sysmiss		5878		NA

r4pad6d1

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=4 and BW_ran4PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:197] [Invalid:6100] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	28	14.2%	0.14213198
2	Agree	35	17.8%	0.17766497
3	Agree somewhat	49	24.9%	0.24873096
4	Neither agree nor disagree	35	17.8%	0.17766497
5	Disagree somewhat	8	4.1%	0.04060914
6	Disagree	24	12.2%	0.12182741
7	Strongly disagree	18	9.1%	0.09137056
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6100		NA

r4pad6d2

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=4 and BW_ran4PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:216] [Invalid:6081] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	31	14.4%	0.14351852
2	Agree	42	19.4%	0.19444444
3	Agree somewhat	33	15.3%	0.15277778
4	Neither agree nor disagree	56	25.9%	0.25925926
5	Disagree somewhat	13	6.0%	0.06018519
6	Disagree	21	9.7%	0.09722222
7	Strongly disagree	20	9.3%	0.09259259
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6081		NA

r4pad6d1_recode

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD6D1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=4. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:162] [Invalid:6135] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	50	30.9%	0.308642
2	Agree	112	69.1%	0.691358
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6135		NA

r4bw_ran5pad6

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=5. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:422] [Invalid:5875] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	205	48.6%	0.485782
2	2	217	51.4%	0.514218
Sysmiss		5875		NA

r4pad6e1

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=5 and BW_ran5PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:202] [Invalid:6095] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	23	11.4%	0.11386139
2	Agree	36	17.8%	0.17821782
3	Agree somewhat	40	19.8%	0.19801980
4	Neither agree nor disagree	44	21.8%	0.21782178
5	Disagree somewhat	17	8.4%	0.08415842
6	Disagree	26	12.9%	0.12871287
7	Strongly disagree	16	7.9%	0.07920792
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6095		NA

r4pad6e2

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=5 and BW_ran5PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:212] [Invalid:6085] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	27	12.7%	0.12735849
2	Agree	27	12.7%	0.12735849
3	Agree somewhat	36	17.0%	0.16981132
4	Neither agree nor disagree	68	32.1%	0.32075472
5	Disagree somewhat	11	5.2%	0.05188679
6	Disagree	21	9.9%	0.09905660
7	Strongly disagree	22	10.4%	0.10377358
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6085		NA

r4pad6e1_recode

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD6E1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=5. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:158] [Invalid:6139] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	59	37.3%	0.3734177
2	Agree	99	62.7%	0.6265823
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6139		NA

r4bw_ran6pad6

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=6. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:333] [Invalid:5964] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	163	48.9%	0.4894895
2	2	170	51.1%	0.5105105
Sysmiss		5964		NA

r4pad6f1

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=6 and BW_ran6PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:160] [Invalid:6137] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	20	12.5%	0.12500
2	Agree	35	21.9%	0.21875
3	Agree somewhat	27	16.9%	0.16875
4	Neither agree nor disagree	31	19.4%	0.19375
5	Disagree somewhat	12	7.5%	0.07500
6	Disagree	24	15.0%	0.15000
7	Strongly disagree	11	6.9%	0.06875
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6137		NA

r4pad6f2

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=6 and BW_ran6PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:168] [Invalid:6129] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	29	17.3%	0.17261905
2	Agree	26	15.5%	0.15476190
3	Agree somewhat	31	18.5%	0.18452381
4	Neither agree nor disagree	48	28.6%	0.28571429
5	Disagree somewhat	12	7.1%	0.07142857
6	Disagree	11	6.5%	0.06547619
7	Strongly disagree	11	6.5%	0.06547619
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6129		NA

r4pad6f1_recode

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Recodes R4PAD6F1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=6. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:129] [Invalid:6168] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	47	36.4%	0.3643411
2	Agree	82	63.6%	0.6356589
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		6168		NA

r4bw_ran7pad6

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=7. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]

r4pad6g1

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=7 and BW_ran7PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]

r4pad6g2

Variable label:	Support for academic boycott of Israel
Literal question:	Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=7 and BW_ran7PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]

r4pad7

Variable label:	How strong is your opinion on the question of boycott?
Literal question:	How strong are your views about this question?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2408] [Invalid:3889] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strong	244	10.1%	0.1013289
2	Strong	531	22.1%	0.2205150
3	Fairly strong	784	32.6%	0.3255814
4	Weak	529	22.0%	0.2196844
5	I do not have an opinion about this	320	13.3%	0.1328904
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		3889		NA

r4pad8

Variable label:	How good do you feel that your knowledge about the issue of boycott?
Literal question:	How good do you feel that your knowledge about this subject is?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2404] [Invalid:3893] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	108	4.5%	0.04492512
2	Good	661	27.5%	0.27495840
3	Some knowledge	1074	44.7%	0.44675541
4	Not much knowledge	478	19.9%	0.19883527
5	No knowledge at all	83	3.5%	0.03452579
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		3893		NA

r4pad9

Variable label:	Estimates of Norwegians attitude towards boycott of Israel
Literal question:	If you had to make a guess, how many citizens in Norway do you think would agree with such an academic boycott of Israel?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran30=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2394] [Invalid:3903] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Almost everyone	22	0.9%	0.009189641
2	Around 2 out of 3	450	18.8%	0.187969925
3	Around half	807	33.7%	0.337092732
4	Around 1 out of 3	893	37.3%	0.373015873
5	Almost no-one	222	9.3%	0.092731830
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.000000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		3903		NA

r4ran1

Variable label:	[Randomizes]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6201] [Invalid:96] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	3109	50.1%	0.5013707
2	2	3092	49.9%	0.4986293
Sysmiss		96		NA

r4ran1_1

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran1=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3109] [Invalid:3188] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	428	13.8%	0.1376648
2	2	429	13.8%	0.1379865
3	3	444	14.3%	0.1428112
4	4	425	13.7%	0.1366999
5	5	483	15.5%	0.1553554
6	6	454	14.6%	0.1460277
7	7	446	14.3%	0.1434545
Sysmiss		3188		NA

r4dv44a

Variable label:	Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a young muslim
Literal question:	Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A young Muslim calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very likely	75	17.5%	0.175233645
2	Likely	176	41.1%	0.411214953
3	Somewhat likely	92	21.5%	0.214953271
4	Not very likely	59	13.8%	0.137850467
5	Not likely at all	23	5.4%	0.053738318
97	No answer	3	0.7%	0.007009346
98	Not asked	5869		NA

r4dv44b

Variable label:	Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a young Roma
Literal question:	Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A young Roma person calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very likely	27	6.3%	0.062937063
2	Likely	80	18.6%	0.186480186
3	Somewhat likely	97	22.6%	0.226107226
4	Not very likely	134	31.2%	0.312354312
5	Not likely at all	87	20.3%	0.202797203
97	No answer	4	0.9%	0.009324009
98	Not asked	5868		NA

r4dv44c

Variable label:	Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a young Progress Party politician
Literal question:	Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A young Progress Party politician calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very likely	155	34.9%	0.34909910
2	Likely	193	43.5%	0.43468468
3	Somewhat likely	57	12.8%	0.12837838
4	Not very likely	23	5.2%	0.05180180
5	Not likely at all	9	2.0%	0.02027027
97	No answer	7	1.6%	0.01576577
98	Not asked	5853		NA

r4dv44d

Variable label:	Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a young member of the Hells Angels
Literal question:	Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A young member of the Hells Angels calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very likely	9	2.1%	0.02117647
2	Likely	53	12.5%	0.12470588
3	Somewhat likely	56	13.2%	0.13176471
4	Not very likely	159	37.4%	0.37411765
5	Not likely at all	142	33.4%	0.33411765
97	No answer	6	1.4%	0.01411765
98	Not asked	5872		NA

r4dv44e

Variable label:	Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a young member of the Prophet’s Ummah
Literal question:	Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A young member of the fundamentalist group, the Prophet’s Ummah, calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very likely	4	0.8%	0.008281573
2	Likely	34	7.0%	0.070393375
3	Somewhat likely	36	7.5%	0.074534161
4	Not very likely	152	31.5%	0.314699793
5	Not likely at all	251	52.0%	0.519668737
97	No answer	6	1.2%	0.012422360
98	Not asked	5814		NA

r4dv44f

Variable label:	Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a Roma person
Literal question:	Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A Roma person calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very likely	22	4.8%	0.048458150
2	Likely	74	16.3%	0.162995595
3	Somewhat likely	82	18.1%	0.180616740
4	Not very likely	156	34.4%	0.343612335
5	Not likely at all	116	25.6%	0.255506608
97	No answer	4	0.9%	0.008810573
98	Not asked	5843		NA

r4dv44g

Variable label:	Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a young nursing student
Literal question:	Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A young nursing student calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very likely	182	40.8%	0.408071749
2	Likely	225	50.4%	0.504484305
3	Somewhat likely	22	4.9%	0.049327354
4	Not very likely	8	1.8%	0.017937220
5	Not likely at all	1	0.2%	0.002242152
97	No answer	8	1.8%	0.017937220
98	Not asked	5851		NA

r4ran32

Variable label:	[Randomizes]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3539] [Invalid:2758] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	1220	34.5%	0.3447301
2	2	1151	32.5%	0.3252331
3	3	1168	33.0%	0.3300367
Sysmiss		2758		NA

r4ran33

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran32=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:5077] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	307	25.2%	0.2516393
2	2	304	24.9%	0.2491803
3	3	299	24.5%	0.2450820
4	4	310	25.4%	0.2540984
Sysmiss		5077		NA

r4oc8a

Variable label:	Enough oil for about 25 years or depleted in 15 years
Literal question:	Some people say that we will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now. Others say that at the rate we are using our oil, it will all be used up in 15 years. Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran33=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	There will be plenty of oil in 25 years	233	75.9%	0.75895765
2	Oil will be used up in 15 years	65	21.2%	0.21172638
97	No answer	9	2.9%	0.02931596
98	Not asked	5990		NA

r4oc8b

Variable label:	Exhausted oil reserves in about 15 years or enough oil in 25 years
Literal question:	Some people say that that at the rate we are using our oil, it will be all used up in 15 years. Others say that we will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now. Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran33=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Oil will be used up in 15 years	57	18.8%	0.18750000
2	There will be plenty of oil in 25 years	240	78.9%	0.78947368
97	No answer	7	2.3%	0.02302632
98	Not asked	5993		NA

r4oc8c

Variable label:	Enough oil for about 25 years or depleted in 15 years
Literal question:	Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right? We will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now, or at the rate we are using our oil, it will all be used up in 15 years.
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran33=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	There will be plenty of oil in 25 years	230	76.9%	0.76923077
2	Oil will be used up in 15 years	63	21.1%	0.21070234
97	No answer	6	2.0%	0.02006689
98	Not asked	5998		NA

r4oc8d

Variable label:	Exhausted oil reserves for about 15 years or enough oil in 25 years
Literal question:	Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right? At the rate we are using our oil, it will be all used up in 15 years, or we will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now.
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran33=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Oil will be used up in 15 years	78	25.2%	0.251612903
2	There will be plenty of oil in 25 years	229	73.9%	0.738709677
97	No answer	3	1.0%	0.009677419
98	Not asked	5987		NA

r4ran34

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran32=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:5077] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	362	29.7%	0.2967213
2	2	294	24.1%	0.2409836
3	3	294	24.1%	0.2409836
4	4	270	22.1%	0.2213115
Sysmiss		5077		NA

r4oc9a

Variable label:	Cause of crime: individuals or social conditions
Literal question:	Which in your opinion is more to blame for crime and lawlessness in this country - individuals or social conditions?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran34=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Individuals more to blame	183	50.6%	0.50552486
2	Social conditions more to blame	171	47.2%	0.47237569
97	No answer	8	2.2%	0.02209945
98	Not asked	5935		NA

r4oc9b

Variable label:	Cause of crime: social factors or individuals
Literal question:	Which in your opinion is more to blame for crime and lawlessness in this country - social conditions or individuals?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran34=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Social conditions more to blame	155	52.7%	0.52721088
2	Individuals more to blame	131	44.6%	0.44557823
97	No answer	8	2.7%	0.02721088
98	Not asked	6003		NA

r4oc9c

Variable label:	Statement: Individuals are more to blame than social conditions for crime and lawlessness in this country.
Literal question:	Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Individuals are more to blame than social conditions for crime and lawlessness in this country.
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran34=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Agree	147	50.0%	0.50000000
2	Disagree	141	48.0%	0.47959184
97	No answer	6	2.0%	0.02040816
98	Not asked	6003		NA

r4oc9d

Variable label:	Statement: Social conditions are more to blame than individuals for crime and lawlessness in this country.
Literal question:	Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Social conditions are more to blame than individuals for crime and lawlessness in this country.
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran34=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Agree	158	58.5%	0.58518519
2	Disagree	105	38.9%	0.38888889
97	No answer	7	2.6%	0.02592593
98	Not asked	6027		NA

r4ran35

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran32=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:5077] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	269	22.0%	0.2204918
2	2	304	24.9%	0.2491803
3	3	310	25.4%	0.2540984
4	4	337	27.6%	0.2762295
Sysmiss		5077		NA

r4oc10a

Variable label:	Do you think the government should or should not see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living?
Literal question:	Do you think the government should or should not see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran35=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Government should see to it	186	69.1%	0.69144981
2	Government should not see to it	73	27.1%	0.27137546
97	No answer	10	3.7%	0.03717472
98	Not asked	6028		NA

r4oc10b

Variable label:	Statement: The government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living.
Literal question:	Do you agree or disagree with this statement? The government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living.
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran35=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Agree	179	58.9%	0.58881579
2	Disagree	121	39.8%	0.39802632
97	No answer	4	1.3%	0.01315789
98	Not asked	5993		NA

r4oc10c

Variable label:	Statement: The government should not see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living.
Literal question:	Do you agree or disagree with this statement? The government should not see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living.
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran35=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Agree	70	22.6%	0.22580645
2	Disagree	231	74.5%	0.74516129
97	No answer	9	2.9%	0.02903226
98	Not asked	5987		NA

r4oc10d

Variable label:	Do you think the government should not or should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living?
Literal question:	Do you think the government should not or should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran35=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Government should not see to it	101	30.0%	0.29970326
2	Government should see to it	215	63.8%	0.63798220
97	No answer	21	6.2%	0.06231454
98	Not asked	5960		NA

r4ran36

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran32=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1219] [Invalid:5078] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	625	51.3%	0.5127153
2	2	594	48.7%	0.4872847
Sysmiss		5078		NA

r4oc11a

Variable label:	Statements: Politics is complicated
Literal question:	Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Sometimes politics and government seem so complicated that a person like me can’t really understand what’s going on.
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran36=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Agree	289	46.2%	0.4624
2	Disagree	321	51.4%	0.5136
97	No answer	15	2.4%	0.0240
98	Not asked	5672		NA

r4oc11b

Variable label:	Politics is so complicated that you can not understand what is happening
Literal question:	Would you say that sometimes politics and government seem so complicated that a person like you can’t really understand what’s going on, or that you really can understand what’s going on?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran36=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Sometimes so complicated can't understand	403	67.8%	0.67845118
2	Can understand all the time	180	30.3%	0.30303030
97	No answer	11	1.9%	0.01851852
98	Not asked	5703		NA

r4ran37

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran32=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1218] [Invalid:5079] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	304	25.0%	0.2495895
2	2	315	25.9%	0.2586207
3	3	286	23.5%	0.2348112
4	4	313	25.7%	0.2569787
Sysmiss		5079		NA

r4oc12a

Variable label:	Courts: Strict enough towards criminals, no perception
Literal question:	In general, do you think the courts in this area deal too harshly or not harshly enough with criminals, or do you not have an opinion on that?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran37=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Too harshly	4	1.3%	0.013157895
2	Not harshly enough	189	62.2%	0.621710526
3	No opinion	109	35.9%	0.358552632
97	No answer	2	0.7%	0.006578947
98	Not asked	5993		NA

r4oc12b

Variable label:	Courts: Strict enough towards criminals, missing information
Literal question:	In general, do you think the courts in this area deal too harshly or not harshly enough with criminals, or don’t you have enough information about the courts to say?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran37=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Too harshly	4	1.3%	0.01269841
2	Not harshly enough	158	50.2%	0.50158730
3	Don’t have enough information to say	149	47.3%	0.47301587
97	No answer	4	1.3%	0.01269841
98	Not asked	5982		NA

r4oc12c

Variable label:	Courts: Strict enough towards criminals, do not know
Literal question:	In general, do you think the courts in this area deal too harshly or not harshly enough with criminals, or don’t you know?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran37=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Too harshly	2	0.7%	0.006993007
2	Not harshly enough	159	55.6%	0.555944056
3	I don’t know	119	41.6%	0.416083916
97	No answer	6	2.1%	0.020979021
98	Not asked	6011		NA

r4oc12d

Variable label:	Courts: Strict enough towards criminals
Literal question:	In general, do you think the courts in this area deal too harshly or not harshly enough with criminals, or don’t you know?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran37=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Too harshly	16	5.1%	0.05111821
2	Not harshly enough	269	85.9%	0.85942492
97	No answer	28	8.9%	0.08945687
98	Not asked	5984		NA

r4ran38

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran32=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1217] [Invalid:5080] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	272	22.4%	0.2235004
2	2	316	26.0%	0.2596549
3	3	316	26.0%	0.2596549
4	4	313	25.7%	0.2571898
Sysmiss		5080		NA

r4oc13a

Variable label:	Those who work in government are smart people or people who do not know what they are doing, no opinion
Literal question:	Do you feel that almost all of the people running the government are smart people, or do you think that quite a few of them don’t seem to know what they are doing, or do you not have an opinion on that?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran38=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Are smart	72	26.5%	0.26470588
2	They don’t know what they’re doing	90	33.1%	0.33088235
3	No opinion	102	37.5%	0.37500000
97	No answer	8	2.9%	0.02941176
98	Not asked	6025		NA

r4oc13b

Variable label:	Those who work in government are people who do not know what they are doing or smart people
Literal question:	Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government don’t seem to know what they are doing, or do you feel that almost all of them are smart people?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran38=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	They don’t know what they’re doing	159	50.3%	0.50316456
2	Are smart	138	43.7%	0.43670886
97	No answer	19	6.0%	0.06012658
98	Not asked	5981		NA

r4oc13c

Variable label:	Those who work in government are smart people or people who do not know what they’re doing, do not know
Literal question:	Do you feel that almost all of the people running the government are smart people, or do you think that quite a few of them don’t seem to know what they are doing, or don’t you know?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran38=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Are smart	83	26.3%	0.26265823
2	They don’t know what they’re doing	104	32.9%	0.32911392
3	Don’t know	125	39.6%	0.39556962
97	No answer	4	1.3%	0.01265823
98	Not asked	5981		NA

r4oc13d

Variable label:	Those who work in government are smart people or people who do not know what they’re doing
Literal question:	Do you feel that almost all of the people running the government are smart people, or do you think that quite a few of them don’t seem to know what they are doing?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran38=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Are smart	157	50.2%	0.5015974
2	They don’t know what they’re doing	139	44.4%	0.4440895
97	No answer	17	5.4%	0.0543131
98	Not asked	5984		NA

r4ran39

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran32=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1217] [Invalid:5080] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	294	24.2%	0.2415776
2	2	300	24.7%	0.2465078
3	3	316	26.0%	0.2596549
4	4	307	25.2%	0.2522597
Sysmiss		5080		NA

r4oc14a

Variable label:	Mandatory labor union membership, or against
Literal question:	If there is a union at a particular company or business, do you think that all the workers there should be required to be union members, or are you opposed to this?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran39=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes, all in union	103	35.0%	0.35034014
2	No, oppose	180	61.2%	0.61224490
97	No answer	11	3.7%	0.03741497
98	Not asked	6003		NA

r4oc14b

Variable label:	Mandatory labor union membership
Literal question:	If there is a union at a particular company or business, do you think that all the workers there should be required to be union members?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran39=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	76	25.3%	0.2533333
2	No	218	72.7%	0.7266667
97	No answer	6	2.0%	0.0200000
98	Not asked	5997		NA

r4oc14c

Variable label:	Mandatory labor union membership, or up to each individual to decide
Literal question:	If there is a union at a particular company or business, do you think that all the workers there should be required to be union members, or should it be left to the individuals to decide whether or not he wants to be in the union?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran39=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	All should be required	52	16.5%	0.164556962
2	Left to individuals	262	82.9%	0.829113924
97	No answer	2	0.6%	0.006329114
98	Not asked	5981		NA

r4oc14d

Variable label:	Against mandatory labor union membership, or for it
Literal question:	If there is a union at a particular company or business, are you opposed to all the workers there being required to be union members, or do you think that all the workers there should be required to be union members?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran39=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Oppose	181	59.0%	0.58957655
2	All in union	112	36.5%	0.36482085
97	No answer	14	4.6%	0.04560261
98	Not asked	5990		NA

r4ran40

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran32=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1215] [Invalid:5082] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	585	48.1%	0.4814815
2	2	630	51.9%	0.5185185
Sysmiss		5082		NA

r4oc15aa

Variable label:	Allow labor unions to spend money in support to select or beat candidates for political positions
Literal question:	Do you think labor unions should be permitted to spend their money to help elect or defeat candidates for political offices?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran40=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	141	24.1%	0.24102564
2	No	424	72.5%	0.72478632
97	No answer	20	3.4%	0.03418803
98	Not asked	5712		NA

r4oc15ab

Variable label:	Allow businesses to spend money to support select or beat candidates for political positions
Literal question:	Do you think businesses should be permitted to spend their money to help elect or defeat candidates for political offices?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran40=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	131	22.4%	0.22393162
2	No	430	73.5%	0.73504274
97	No answer	24	4.1%	0.04102564
98	Not asked	5712		NA

r4oc15ba

Variable label:	Allow businesses to spend money to support select or beat candidates for political positions
Literal question:	Do you think businesses should be permitted to spend their money to help elect or defeat candidates for political offices?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran40=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	125	19.8%	0.19841270
2	No	481	76.3%	0.76349206
97	No answer	24	3.8%	0.03809524
98	Not asked	5667		NA

r4oc15bb

Variable label:	Allow labor unions to spend money in support to select or beat candidates for political positions
Literal question:	Do you think labor unions should be permitted to spend their money to help elect or defeat candidates for political offices?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran40=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	137	21.7%	0.21746032
2	No	464	73.7%	0.73650794
97	No answer	29	4.6%	0.04603175
98	Not asked	5667		NA

r4ran41

Variable label:	[Randomizes if ran32=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1213] [Invalid:5084] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	612	50.5%	0.5045342
2	2	601	49.5%	0.4954658
Sysmiss		5084		NA

r4oc16a

Variable label:	Can trust others, or cant’t be too careful
Literal question:	Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you can’t be too careful in dealing with people?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran41=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Most people can be trusted	465	76.0%	0.75980392
2	Can’t be too careful	137	22.4%	0.22385621
97	No answer	10	1.6%	0.01633987
98	Not asked	5685		NA

r4oc16b

Variable label:	Can’t be too careful, or can trust others
Literal question:	Generally speaking, would you say that you can’t be too careful in dealing with people or that most people can be trusted?
Technical description:	[Asked if ran32=1 and ran41=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Can’t be too careful	152	25.3%	0.25291181
2	Most people can be trusted	441	73.4%	0.73377704
97	No answer	8	1.3%	0.01331115
98	Not asked	5696		NA

r4k20

Variable label:	Description of life situation or occupation
Literal question:	We will now ask you some questions about your background. Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Paid work (or temporarily absent)	74	56.1%	0.560606061
2	Studying (not paid for by an employer)	5	3.8%	0.037878788
3	Unemployed and actively seeking work	2	1.5%	0.015151515
4	Unemployed, wanting a job, but not actively seeking work	4	3.0%	0.030303030
5	Permanently ill or disabled	3	2.3%	0.022727273
6	Retired	15	11.4%	0.113636364
7	Civilian or military service	0	0.0%	0.000000000
8	At home, looking after children or others	1	0.8%	0.007575758
9	Other	12	9.1%	0.090909091
97	No answer	16	12.1%	0.121212121
98	Not asked	6165		NA

r4k21

Variable label:	Works in following business
Literal question:	What type of company do you work for?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Government, county or municipal administration	10	13.5%	0.13513514
2	Public sector (e.g. school or the health service)	15	20.3%	0.20270270
3	Publicly owned company	4	5.4%	0.05405405
4	Private company	37	50.0%	0.50000000
5	Self-employed	7	9.5%	0.09459459
6	Other:	1	1.4%	0.01351351
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	6223		NA

r4k21_6_other

Variable label:	Other: Works in following business [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What type of company do you work for?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k323

Variable label:	Title of main occupation [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What is the name or title of your main profession? Please enter your full job title. Please be as specific as possible.
Technical description:	Here are a few examples: Nurse. 6th form college teacher. Shop assistant. [Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k323a

Variable label:	Main tasks or duties in main occupation [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What are your main tasks or duties in your main profession? Please provide as many details as possible.
Technical description:	Here are a few examples: Provide assistance and administer medication at an old people’s home. Prepare teaching material. Teach Norwegian and mathematics and mark exams. Sell shoes and help customers in a shop. [Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k23b

Variable label:	Responsible for directing other employees in the main job
Literal question:	Are you responsible for managing the work of other employees in your main job?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	53	71.6%	0.7162162
2	Yes, I manage 10 or more employees.	11	14.9%	0.1486486
3	Yes, I manage less than 10 employees.	10	13.5%	0.1351351
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	6223		NA

r4k24

Variable label:	Workplace in oil or gas industry, or closely linked to it
Literal question:	Is your workplace in the oil and gas industry, or closely associated with it?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes, I work for the oil and gas industry	4	5.4%	0.05405405
2	Yes, my work is closely associated with the oil and gas industry	4	5.4%	0.05405405
3	No	66	89.2%	0.89189189
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	6223		NA

r4k25

Variable label:	Current income
Literal question:	What is your current income?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	< 150 000	37	15.2%	0.15226337
2	150 001 - 300 000	33	13.6%	0.13580247
3	300 001 - 400 000	29	11.9%	0.11934156
4	400 001 - 500 000	19	7.8%	0.07818930
5	500 001 - 600 000	31	12.8%	0.12757202
6	600 001 - 700 000	6	2.5%	0.02469136
7	700 001 - 1 000 000	7	2.9%	0.02880658
8	>1 000 000	8	3.3%	0.03292181
97	No answer	73	30.0%	0.30041152
98	Not asked	6054		NA

r4k26

Variable label:	Highest completed education
Literal question:	What is your highest level of completed education?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No completed education	4	2.7%	0.027397260
2	Primary school (first part of compulsory education)	1	0.7%	0.006849315
3	Secondary school (grunnskole, 7-årig folkeskole, framhaldskole, realskole)	6	4.1%	0.041095890
4	County college certificate	1	0.7%	0.006849315
5	6th form college/end of formal schooling, humanities subjects, university preparatory course, 1-year Post-leaving Certificate course (VK2, VG stage 3, gymnas)	15	10.3%	0.102739726
6	6th form college/end of formal schooling, vocational subjects/courses (VK2, VK3, VG stage 3, vocational certificate, journeyman's certificate)	16	11.0%	0.109589041
7	Preliminary course for university/college without credits	2	1.4%	0.013698630
8	Certificate for additional further education (technical college)	3	2.1%	0.020547945
9	University/college, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (2 and 2½ year associate degree)	11	7.5%	0.075342466
10	Completed 3-4 years of college education (Bachelor, BA, B.Sc., teacher's training college, nursing college, nursery teacher, engineer, business economist, etc.)	30	20.5%	0.205479452
11	Completed 3-4 years of university education (Bachelor, BA, B.Sc.)	11	7.5%	0.075342466
12	Completed 5-6 years of college education (Masters, main subject)	6	4.1%	0.041095890
13	Completed 5-6 years of university education (Masters, main subject), longer professional education (Bachelor of Divinity, Bachelor of Psychology, Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Veterinary Medicine, Master of Science, architect, business economist (13)	8	5.5%	0.054794521
14	Researcher (Ph.D)	3	2.1%	0.020547945
15	None of these	3	2.1%	0.020547945
97	No answer	26	17.8%	0.178082192
98	Not asked	6151		NA

r4k27

Variable label:	Marital status
Literal question:	Marital status. Please click whichever alternative is most applicable.
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Never been married, had a partner or legally registered partner	14	10.3%	0.102941176
2	Married	50	36.8%	0.367647059
3	Legally registered partner	1	0.7%	0.007352941
4	Partner	31	22.8%	0.227941176
5	Divorced/separated	12	8.8%	0.088235294
6	Former partner	3	2.2%	0.022058824
7	Former legally registered partner	0	0.0%	0.000000000
8	Widow/widower	5	3.7%	0.036764706
9	Other:	2	1.5%	0.014705882
97	No answer	18	13.2%	0.132352941
98	Not asked	6161		NA

r4k27_9_other

Variable label:	Other: Marital status [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Marital status. Please click whichever alternative is most applicable.
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k28

Variable label:	Nationality
Literal question:	Nationality: Are you:
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A Norwegian citizen	97	69.8%	0.6978417
2	A citizen of another country. Please state which	24	17.3%	0.1726619
97	No answer	18	12.9%	0.1294964
98	Not asked	6158		NA

r4k28_2_other

Variable label:	Citizen of another country [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Statsborger i annet land. Vennligst skriv hvilket
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k29

Variable label:	Mother or father immigrated to Norway
Literal question:	Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	99	71.7%	0.71739130
2	I have immigrated to Norway	13	9.4%	0.09420290
3	Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway	3	2.2%	0.02173913
4	My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not	5	3.6%	0.03623188
5	My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not	2	1.4%	0.01449275
97	No answer	16	11.6%	0.11594203
98	Not asked	6159		NA

r4k30_1

Variable label:	Country before immigration [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Which country did you live in before you immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k30_2_1

Variable label:	Mothers country of origin [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text:	Which country did your parents (mother, father or both) live in before they immigrated to Norway?
Literal question:	Mother:
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k30_2_2

Variable label:	Fathers country of origin [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text:	Hvilket land bodde dine foreldre (mor, far eller begge) i før de innvandret?
Literal question:	Father:
Technical description:	[Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r4k40

Variable label:	Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Do you belong to a religion or a religious community?
Technical description:	[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]

Value	Label	Cases
1	The Church of Norway	0	NaN
2	The Catholic Church	0	NaN
3	An orthodox church (Greek, Russian, other)	0	NaN
4	Other protestant faiths (e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, etc.)	0	NaN
5	Other Christian faiths (e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons)	0	NaN
6	The Mosaic faith (Jewish)	0	NaN
7	Islam (Muslim)	0	NaN
8	Eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism)	0	NaN
9	Other non-Christian religions	0	NaN
10	I don't belong to any religion or religious communities.	0	NaN
97	No answer	0	NaN
Sysmiss		6297	NA

r4k40_recode

Variable label:	Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
Literal question:	Tilhører du en religion eller et religiøst kirkesamfunn?
Technical description:	[Recoded from source variable r4k40.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Church of Norway	4110	65.3%	0.652691758
2	The Catholic Church	97	1.5%	0.015404161
3	Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons)	252	4.0%	0.040019057
4	Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others)	64	1.0%	0.010163570
5	Islam	42	0.7%	0.006669843
6	I don't belong to any religion or religious communities.	1583	25.1%	0.251389551
97	No answer	149	2.4%	0.023662061

r4k41

Variable label:	Attending religious meetings
Literal question:	Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say that you attend religions meetings at the moment?
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6155] [Invalid:142] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Daily	13	0.2%	0.002112104
2	More than once a week	96	1.6%	0.015597076
3	Once a week	192	3.1%	0.031194151
4	At least once a month	302	4.9%	0.049065800
5	Only at special festivals	1308	21.3%	0.212510154
6	Less often	1513	24.6%	0.245816409
7	Never	2731	44.4%	0.443704305
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.000000000
Sysmiss		142		NA

r4k42

Variable label:	Living with children under 16 years
Literal question:	Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you, and if so, how many?
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6126] [Invalid:171] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	None	4542	74.1%	0.7414299706
2	1	672	11.0%	0.1096963761
3	2	679	11.1%	0.1108390467
4	3	205	3.3%	0.0334639243
5	4	25	0.4%	0.0040809664
6	5	1	0.0%	0.0001632387
7	6 or more	2	0.0%	0.0003264773
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000000
Sysmiss		171		NA

r4P1

Variable label:	Gender
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Male	3144	49.9%	0.4992854
2	Female	3153	50.1%	0.5007146

r4P2

Variable label:	Region
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Oslo/Akershus	1761	28.0%	0.27965698
2	Østlandet	1538	24.4%	0.24424329
3	Sørlandet	306	4.9%	0.04859457
4	Vestlandet	1658	26.3%	0.26329998
5	Trøndelag	545	8.7%	0.08654915
6	Nord-Norge	489	7.8%	0.07765603

r4P3

Variable label:	County
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Akershus	790	12.5%	0.125456567
2	Oslo	971	15.4%	0.154200413
3	Østfold	327	5.2%	0.051929490
4	Vestfold	322	5.1%	0.051135461
5	Hedmark	190	3.0%	0.030173098
6	Oppland	191	3.0%	0.030331904
7	Buskerud	323	5.1%	0.051294267
8	Telemark	185	2.9%	0.029379069
9	Vest-Agder	196	3.1%	0.031125933
10	Aust-Agder	110	1.7%	0.017468636
11	Rogaland	556	8.8%	0.088296014
12	Hordaland	729	11.6%	0.115769414
13	Sogn og Fjordane	104	1.7%	0.016515801
14	Møre og Romsdal	269	4.3%	0.042718755
15	Sør-Trøndelag	429	6.8%	0.068127680
16	Nord-Trøndelag	116	1.8%	0.018421471
17	Nordland	249	4.0%	0.039542639
18	Troms	185	2.9%	0.029379069
19	Finmark	55	0.9%	0.008734318

r4P4_1

Variable label:	Highest level of completed education
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No education/elementary school	619	9.8%	0.09830078
2	Upper secondary eduction	1908	30.3%	0.30300143
3	University/university college	3514	55.8%	0.55804351
97	No answer	256	4.1%	0.04065428

r4P4_2

Variable label:	Highest level of completed education
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No completed education	28	0.4%	0.004446562
2	Primary school (first part of compulsory education)	41	0.7%	0.006511037
3	Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school, secondary school)	550	8.7%	0.087343179
4	College certificate	50	0.8%	0.007940289
5	Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education programme, one-year post admission	812	12.9%	0.128950294
6	Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes (qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination)	798	12.7%	0.126727013
7	Pre-university/college course that does not give credits	80	1.3%	0.012704462
8	Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical college)	218	3.5%	0.034619660
9	University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ year)	587	9.3%	0.093218993
10	Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist, etc.)	1254	19.9%	0.199142449
11	Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor)	423	6.7%	0.067174845
12	Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master)	445	7.1%	0.070668572
13	Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian, engineer, architect, senior business economist)	688	10.9%	0.109258377
14	Research level (Ph.D.)	117	1.9%	0.018580276
15	None of these	176	2.8%	0.027949817
97	No answer	30	0.5%	0.004764173

r4P5_1

Variable label:	Year of birth
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1939 or earlier	232	3.7%	0.03684294
2	1940-1949	1060	16.8%	0.16833413
3	1950-1959	1416	22.5%	0.22486899
4	1960-1969	1303	20.7%	0.20692393
5	1970-1979	1016	16.1%	0.16134667
6	1980-1989	828	13.1%	0.13149119
7	1990 or later	442	7.0%	0.07019215

r4P5_2

Variable label:	Year of birth
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1959 or earlier	2708	43.0%	0.43004605
2	1960-1989	3147	50.0%	0.49976179
3	1990 or later	442	7.0%	0.07019215

r4_Weight_1

Variable label:	Weight based on variables P3, P5_2 and P1. See documentation report
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]

r4_Weight_2

Variable label:	Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4_1 and P1. See documentation report
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-7]

r4Weight4

Variable label:	Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1) upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2 and x <= 5).
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-3]

Codebook - Round 4 - Norwegian Citizen Panel