Codebook

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Round 5

v-102 - 2023-11-06

Produced by ideas2evidence

Citation

Primary investigators

Name	Affiliation
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten	Coordinator, University of Bergen
Mikael Andersson, Sveinung Arnesen, Lise Bjånesøy, Åsta Nordø, Endre Tvinnereim	Scientific team, University of Bergen and UNI Research Rokkan Centre

Producers

Name	Affiliation	Role
Asle Høgestøl	ideas2evidence	Coordinator
Øivind Skjervheim	ideas2evidence	Coordinator
Jostein Ryssevik	ideas2evidence	Quality assurance

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no

Scope

Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in two waves, wave 1 and wave 3. In wave 1 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3 5.623 members were recruited. Prior to wave 5 the Norwegian Citizen Panel had 10,247 members. The sampling procedure of wave and wave 1 is identical. 25 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.

Mode of Data Collection

The survey is based on a online questionnaire. Existing members receivs e-mail invitations asking for their participation in the current wave.

New panel members were recruited in multiple steps.

First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters contained the following information: a) a description of the project, b) the Citizen Panel’s policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the anonymity of the participants, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the participants’ rights to opt of the panel at any time in the future, e) contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a unique log-in id and the web address to the panel’s web site and g) the estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).

The invitation was emailed on the 28th of October 2015.

Three e-mail reminders were sent at the following dates: 30th of October, 04th of November, and 10th of November. The reminder was sent to those who a) had not entered the questionnaire, and b) had not completed the questionnaire.

Wave 5 was closed 23rd of November.

Weighting

To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix). When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different weights have been calculated:

Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).

When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.

We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.

Change Log

Version	Release date / Date changed	Variable	Changes and notes
v-102	2023-11-06	NA	Revised release of round 5
NA	2023-11-02	r5Weight4	New variable: Added r5Weight4
NA	2023-11-02	r5Weight4	Variable documentation inserted
v-101	2020-06-15	NA	Revised release of round 5
NA	2020-06-12	r5k9_1	Variable documentation updated
NA	2020-06-12	r5k9_2	Variable documentation updated
NA	2020-06-12	r5k9_3	Variable documentation updated
NA	2019-03-27	r5k40 _recode	Added variable based on r5k40.
NA	2018-04-13	r5p5_1	Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
NA	2018-04-13	r5p5_2	Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
NA	2018-02-23	r5p3	Updated the value of 1 respondent.
NA	2018-02-12	r5p4_1	Corrected values of 30 respondents.
NA	2018-02-12	r5p4_2	Corrected values of 30 respondents.
NA	2018-02-12	r5_weight_2	Corrected values of 30 respondents.
NA	2017-06-14	r5p4_1	Updated value on 40 respondents.
NA	2017-06-14	r5p4_2	Updated value on 40 respondents.
NA	2017-02-01	r5pad7	Added anonymized data. Available on request.
NA	2016-08-29	r5rom1a	Added anonymized data. Available on request.
NA	2016-08-29	r5 rom1b	Added anonymized data. Available on request.
NA	2016-04-14	r5ocrecsm8a_2	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5ocrecsm8a_3	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5ocrecsm8b_1	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5ocrecsm8b_3	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5ocrecsm8c_1	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5ocrecsm8c_2	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5pad13d_1	Corrected label and variable documentation.
NA	2016-04-14	r5oc4a_norm_array	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5oc4a_pos_array	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5oc4a_norm	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5oc4a_pos	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5oc4b_pos_array	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5oc4b_norm_array	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5oc4b_pos	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5oc4b_norm	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5bandwagon	Corrected missing values (97/98)
NA	2016-04-14	r5pad3aa	Added anonymized data. Available on request.
NA	2016-04-14	r5pad7_8_background	New variable.
NA	2016-04-14	r5pad1	Added anonymized data. Available on request.
v-100	2015-12-10	NA	Initial release of round 5

Dataset contents

File name	Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 5 - v-102-O.sav
Distribution type	Public
# Cases	5451
# Variables	554

Variable Documentation

responseid

Variable label:	responseid
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5u

Variable label:	Sub-group
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	U1	1325	24.3%	0.2430747
2	U2	1431	26.3%	0.2625206
3	U3	1277	23.4%	0.2342689
4	U4	1418	26.0%	0.2601358

r5rekruttert

Variable label:	Time of recruitment
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1st Wave	2460	45.1%	0.4512933
3	3rd wave	2991	54.9%	0.5487067

r5k1

Variable label:	Interest in politics
Literal question:	In general, how interested are you in politics?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very interested	625	11.5%	0.114657861
2	Interested	2549	46.8%	0.467620620
3	Somewhat interested	1761	32.3%	0.323059989
4	Not very interested	443	8.1%	0.081269492
5	Not interested at all	63	1.2%	0.011557512
97	No answer	10	0.2%	0.001834526

r5timespent_r5k1

Variable label:	Time spent on r5k1
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5K1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-962611]

r5k2

Variable label:	Voted in local elections
Literal question:	Did you vote in the local government elections this autumn?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes, I voted in both the municipal and county council elections	4333	79.5%	0.794900018
2	Yes, but I only voted in the municipal council election	457	8.4%	0.083837828
3	Yes, but I only voted in the county council election	15	0.3%	0.002751789
4	No	598	11.0%	0.109704641
97	No answer	48	0.9%	0.008805724

r5k43_1

Variable label:	Voted for following party at local elections
Pre-question text:	What party did you vote for in the local election?
Literal question:	Municipal council election
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0 and R5K2<=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Red Party	163	3.4%	0.0336290489
2	The Socialist Left Party	284	5.9%	0.0585929441
3	The Labour Party	1482	30.6%	0.3057561378
4	The Christian Democrats	233	4.8%	0.0480709717
5	The Liberal Party	335	6.9%	0.0691149164
6	The Conservative Party	1142	23.6%	0.2356096555
7	The Progress Party	360	7.4%	0.0742727460
8	The Green Party	283	5.8%	0.0583866309
9	The Centre Party	326	6.7%	0.0672580978
10	Other party/local list	155	3.2%	0.0319785434
11	Did not vote	14	0.3%	0.0028883846
12	Not entitled to vote	2	0.0%	0.0004126264
97	No answer	68	1.4%	0.0140292965
98	Not asked	604		NA

r5k43_2

Variable label:	Voted for following party at county council election
Pre-question text:	What party did you vote for in the local election?
Literal question:	County council election
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0 and R5K2<=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Red Party	127	2.6%	0.026234249
2	The Socialist Left Party	242	5.0%	0.049989672
3	The Labour Party	1389	28.7%	0.286924189
4	The Christian Democrats	233	4.8%	0.048130552
5	The Liberal Party	260	5.4%	0.053707912
6	The Conservative Party	1044	21.6%	0.215657922
7	The Progress Party	325	6.7%	0.067134889
8	The Green Party	302	6.2%	0.062383805
9	The Centre Party	259	5.4%	0.053501343
10	Other party/local list	81	1.7%	0.016732080
11	Did not vote	117	2.4%	0.024168560
12	Not entitled to vote	10	0.2%	0.002065689
97	No answer	452	9.3%	0.093369139
98	Not asked	610		NA

r5k204

Variable label:	Would vote for following party at parliamentary election tomorrow
Literal question:	Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Christian Democrats	254	4.7%	0.04659695
2	The Conservative Party	1166	21.4%	0.21390571
3	The Progress Party	569	10.4%	0.10438452
4	The Liberal Party	294	5.4%	0.05393506
5	The Socialist Left Party	275	5.0%	0.05044946
6	The Centre Party	283	5.2%	0.05191708
7	The Green Party	274	5.0%	0.05026601
8	The Labour Party	1802	33.1%	0.33058154
9	The Red Party	151	2.8%	0.02770134
10	Would not vote	117	2.1%	0.02146395
11	Not entitled to vote	89	1.6%	0.01632728
12	Other:	117	2.1%	0.02146395
97	No answer	60	1.1%	0.01100715

r5k204_12_other

Variable label:	Would vote for following party at parliamentary election tomorrow, other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5pad15_1

Variable label:	Likelihood of voting for: The Christian Democrats
Pre-question text:	Some people are certain that they will always vote for the same political party. Others make their minds up each time. We are going to name some parties. Can you indicate how probable it is that you might vote for them at some point?
Literal question:	The Christian Democrats
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 I am certain that I will never vote for this party	548	42.9%	0.42913078
2	1	131	10.3%	0.10258418
3	2	112	8.8%	0.08770556
4	3	82	6.4%	0.06421300
5	4	75	5.9%	0.05873140
6	5	83	6.5%	0.06499608
7	6	42	3.3%	0.03288958
8	7	38	3.0%	0.02975724
9	8	19	1.5%	0.01487862
10	9	23	1.8%	0.01801096
11	10 I am certain that I will vote for this party at some point	40	3.1%	0.03132341
97	No answer	84	6.6%	0.06577917
98	Not asked	4174		NA

r5pad15_2

Variable label:	Likelihood of voting for: The Conservative Party
Pre-question text:	Some people are certain that they will always vote for the same political party. Others make their minds up each time. We are going to name some parties. Can you indicate how probable it is that you might vote for them at some point?
Literal question:	The Conservative Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 I am certain that I will never vote for this party	258	20.2%	0.20203602
2	1	111	8.7%	0.08692247
3	2	83	6.5%	0.06499608
4	3	92	7.2%	0.07204385
5	4	85	6.7%	0.06656226
6	5	92	7.2%	0.07204385
7	6	74	5.8%	0.05794832
8	7	62	4.9%	0.04855129
9	8	88	6.9%	0.06891151
10	9	70	5.5%	0.05481597
11	10 I am certain that I will vote for this party at some point	179	14.0%	0.14017228
97	No answer	83	6.5%	0.06499608
98	Not asked	4174		NA

r5pad15_3

Variable label:	Likelihood of voting for: The Progress Party
Pre-question text:	Some people are certain that they will always vote for the same political party. Others make their minds up each time. We are going to name some parties. Can you indicate how probable it is that you might vote for them at some point?
Literal question:	The Progress Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 I am certain that I will never vote for this party	644	50.4%	0.50430697
2	1	97	7.6%	0.07595928
3	2	81	6.3%	0.06342991
4	3	58	4.5%	0.04541895
5	4	49	3.8%	0.03837118
6	5	45	3.5%	0.03523884
7	6	36	2.8%	0.02819107
8	7	30	2.3%	0.02349256
9	8	35	2.7%	0.02740799
10	9	29	2.3%	0.02270948
11	10 I am certain that I will vote for this party at some point	91	7.1%	0.07126077
97	No answer	82	6.4%	0.06421300
98	Not asked	4174		NA

r5pad15_4

Variable label:	Likelihood of voting for: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text:	Some people are certain that they will always vote for the same political party. Others make their minds up each time. We are going to name some parties. Can you indicate how probable it is that you might vote for them at some point?
Literal question:	The Liberal Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 I am certain that I will never vote for this party	325	25.5%	0.25450274
2	1	110	8.6%	0.08613939
3	2	127	9.9%	0.09945184
4	3	130	10.2%	0.10180110
5	4	119	9.3%	0.09318716
6	5	109	8.5%	0.08535630
7	6	67	5.2%	0.05246672
8	7	53	4.2%	0.04150352
9	8	53	4.2%	0.04150352
10	9	35	2.7%	0.02740799
11	10 I am certain that I will vote for this party at some point	58	4.5%	0.04541895
97	No answer	91	7.1%	0.07126077
98	Not asked	4174		NA

r5pad15_5

Variable label:	Likelihood of voting for: The Socialist Left Party
Pre-question text:	Some people are certain that they will always vote for the same political party. Others make their minds up each time. We are going to name some parties. Can you indicate how probable it is that you might vote for them at some point?
Literal question:	The Socialist Left Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 I am certain that I will never vote for this party	488	38.2%	0.38214565
2	1	127	9.9%	0.09945184
3	2	93	7.3%	0.07282694
4	3	94	7.4%	0.07361002
5	4	64	5.0%	0.05011746
6	5	76	6.0%	0.05951449
7	6	38	3.0%	0.02975724
8	7	54	4.2%	0.04228661
9	8	44	3.4%	0.03445576
10	9	33	2.6%	0.02584182
11	10 I am certain that I will vote for this party at some point	82	6.4%	0.06421300
97	No answer	84	6.6%	0.06577917
98	Not asked	4174		NA

r5pad15_6

Variable label:	Likelihood of voting for: The Centre Party
Pre-question text:	Some people are certain that they will always vote for the same political party. Others make their minds up each time. We are going to name some parties. Can you indicate how probable it is that you might vote for them at some point?
Literal question:	The Centre Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 I am certain that I will never vote for this party	390	30.5%	0.30540329
2	1	175	13.7%	0.13703994
3	2	126	9.9%	0.09866875
4	3	108	8.5%	0.08457322
5	4	118	9.2%	0.09240407
6	5	104	8.1%	0.08144088
7	6	37	2.9%	0.02897416
8	7	29	2.3%	0.02270948
9	8	21	1.6%	0.01644479
10	9	22	1.7%	0.01722788
11	10 I am certain that I will vote for this party at some point	51	4.0%	0.03993735
97	No answer	96	7.5%	0.07517619
98	Not asked	4174		NA

r5pad15_7

Variable label:	Likelihood of voting for: The Green Party
Pre-question text:	Some people are certain that they will always vote for the same political party. Others make their minds up each time. We are going to name some parties. Can you indicate how probable it is that you might vote for them at some point?
Literal question:	The Green Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 I am certain that I will never vote for this party	442	34.6%	0.34612373
2	1	129	10.1%	0.10101801
3	2	95	7.4%	0.07439311
4	3	97	7.6%	0.07595928
5	4	91	7.1%	0.07126077
6	5	95	7.4%	0.07439311
7	6	57	4.5%	0.04463587
8	7	61	4.8%	0.04776821
9	8	43	3.4%	0.03367267
10	9	29	2.3%	0.02270948
11	10 I am certain that I will vote for this party at some point	54	4.2%	0.04228661
97	No answer	84	6.6%	0.06577917
98	Not asked	4174		NA

r5pad15_8

Variable label:	Likelihood of voting for: The Labour Party
Pre-question text:	Some people are certain that they will always vote for the same political party. Others make their minds up each time. We are going to name some parties. Can you indicate how probable it is that you might vote for them at some point?
Literal question:	The Labour Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 I am certain that I will never vote for this party	164	12.8%	0.12842600
2	1	51	4.0%	0.03993735
3	2	70	5.5%	0.05481597
4	3	70	5.5%	0.05481597
5	4	66	5.2%	0.05168363
6	5	113	8.8%	0.08848865
7	6	61	4.8%	0.04776821
8	7	82	6.4%	0.06421300
9	8	95	7.4%	0.07439311
10	9	111	8.7%	0.08692247
11	10 I am certain that I will vote for this party at some point	312	24.4%	0.24432263
97	No answer	82	6.4%	0.06421300
98	Not asked	4174		NA

r5pad15_9

Variable label:	Likelihood of voting for: The Red Party
Pre-question text:	Some people are certain that they will always vote for the same political party. Others make their minds up each time. We are going to name some parties. Can you indicate how probable it is that you might vote for them at some point?
Literal question:	The Red Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 I am certain that I will never vote for this party	679	53.2%	0.53171496
2	1	142	11.1%	0.11119812
3	2	78	6.1%	0.06108066
4	3	61	4.8%	0.04776821
5	4	45	3.5%	0.03523884
6	5	52	4.1%	0.04072044
7	6	30	2.3%	0.02349256
8	7	27	2.1%	0.02114330
9	8	26	2.0%	0.02036022
10	9	17	1.3%	0.01331245
11	10 I am certain that I will vote for this party at some point	38	3.0%	0.02975724
97	No answer	82	6.4%	0.06421300
98	Not asked	4174		NA

r5timespent_r5pad15

Variable label:	Time spent on r5pad15
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5PAD15_1 to R5PAD15_9]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1277] [Invalid:4174] [Range:4-1129781]

r5ran20

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=3]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1277] [Invalid:4174] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	413	32.3%	0.3234143
2	2	442	34.6%	0.3461237
3	3	422	33.0%	0.3304620
Sysmiss		4174		NA

r5ocrecsm1a

Variable label:	Satisfaction with present state of the economy in Norway
Literal question:	On the whole how satisfied are you with the present state of the economy in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	43	10.4%	0.10411622
2	Satisfied	206	49.9%	0.49878935
3	Somewhat satisfied	115	27.8%	0.27845036
4	Slightly satisfied	40	9.7%	0.09685230
5	Not satisfied at all	5	1.2%	0.01210654
97	No answer	4	1.0%	0.00968523
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm1b

Variable label:	Satisfaction with present state of the economy in Norway
Literal question:	On the whole how satisfied are you with the present state of the economy in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	43	9.7%	0.09728507
2	Satisfied	214	48.4%	0.48416290
3	Somewhat satisfied	125	28.3%	0.28280543
4	Slightly satisfied	50	11.3%	0.11312217
5	Not satisfied at all	7	1.6%	0.01583710
97	No answer	3	0.7%	0.00678733
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm1c_1

Variable label:	Satisfaction with present state of the economy in Norway
Literal question:	On the whole how satisfied are you with the present state of the economy in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Extremely dissatisfied	8	1.9%	0.018957346
2	1	3	0.7%	0.007109005
3	2	10	2.4%	0.023696682
4	3	24	5.7%	0.056872038
5	4	33	7.8%	0.078199052
6	5	98	23.2%	0.232227488
7	6	63	14.9%	0.149289100
8	7	91	21.6%	0.215639810
9	8	57	13.5%	0.135071090
10	9	23	5.5%	0.054502370
11	10 Extremely satisfied	12	2.8%	0.028436019
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.000000000
98	Not asked	5029		NA

r5ocrecsm2a

Variable label:	Satisfaction with the government of Norway
Literal question:	Now thinking about the Norwegian government, how satisfied are you with the way it is doing its job?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	5	1.2%	0.01210654
2	Satisfied	114	27.6%	0.27602906
3	Somewhat satisfied	152	36.8%	0.36803874
4	Slightly satisfied	106	25.7%	0.25665860
5	Not satisfied at all	25	6.1%	0.06053269
97	No answer	11	2.7%	0.02663438
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm2b

Variable label:	Satisfaction with the government of Norway
Literal question:	Now thinking about the Norwegian government, how satisfied are you with the way it is doing its job?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	9	2.0%	0.02036199
2	Satisfied	123	27.8%	0.27828054
3	Somewhat satisfied	163	36.9%	0.36877828
4	Slightly satisfied	109	24.7%	0.24660633
5	Not satisfied at all	29	6.6%	0.06561086
97	No answer	9	2.0%	0.02036199
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm2c_1

Variable label:	Satisfaction with the government of Norway
Literal question:	Now thinking about the Norwegian government, how satisfied are you with the way it is doing its job?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Extremely dissatisfied	17	4.0%	0.040284360
2	1	29	6.9%	0.068720379
3	2	33	7.8%	0.078199052
4	3	61	14.5%	0.144549763
5	4	46	10.9%	0.109004739
6	5	72	17.1%	0.170616114
7	6	53	12.6%	0.125592417
8	7	60	14.2%	0.142180095
9	8	27	6.4%	0.063981043
10	9	12	2.8%	0.028436019
11	10 Extremely satisfied	3	0.7%	0.007109005
97	No answer	9	2.1%	0.021327014
98	Not asked	5029		NA

r5ocrecsm3a

Variable label:	Satisfaction with democracy in Norway
Literal question:	And on the whole, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	69	16.7%	0.16707022
2	Satisfied	220	53.3%	0.53268765
3	Somewhat satisfied	79	19.1%	0.19128329
4	Slightly satisfied	33	8.0%	0.07990315
5	Not satisfied at all	5	1.2%	0.01210654
97	No answer	7	1.7%	0.01694915
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm3b

Variable label:	Satisfaction with democracy in Norway
Literal question:	And on the whole, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	70	15.8%	0.15837104
2	Satisfied	232	52.5%	0.52488688
3	Somewhat satisfied	100	22.6%	0.22624434
4	Slightly satisfied	24	5.4%	0.05429864
5	Not satisfied at all	8	1.8%	0.01809955
97	No answer	8	1.8%	0.01809955
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm3c_1

Variable label:	Satisfaction with democracy in Norway
Literal question:	And on the whole, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Extremely dissatisfied	3	0.7%	0.007109005
2	1	3	0.7%	0.007109005
3	2	9	2.1%	0.021327014
4	3	23	5.5%	0.054502370
5	4	23	5.5%	0.054502370
6	5	52	12.3%	0.123222749
7	6	54	12.8%	0.127962085
8	7	74	17.5%	0.175355450
9	8	103	24.4%	0.244075829
10	9	56	13.3%	0.132701422
11	10 Extremely satisfied	17	4.0%	0.040284360
97	No answer	5	1.2%	0.011848341
98	Not asked	5029		NA

r5ocrecsm4a_1

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The parliament
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	The parliament
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	49	11.9%	0.11864407
2	High trust	234	56.7%	0.56658596
3	Some trust	102	24.7%	0.24697337
4	Low trust	20	4.8%	0.04842615
5	No trust at all	4	1.0%	0.00968523
97	No answer	4	1.0%	0.00968523
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm4a_2

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The county council
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	The county council
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	5	1.2%	0.01210654
2	High trust	143	34.6%	0.34624697
3	Some trust	195	47.2%	0.47215496
4	Low trust	55	13.3%	0.13317191
5	No trust at all	7	1.7%	0.01694915
97	No answer	8	1.9%	0.01937046
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm4a_3

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The municipal council
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	The municipal council
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	9	2.2%	0.02179177
2	High trust	157	38.0%	0.38014528
3	Some trust	189	45.8%	0.45762712
4	Low trust	46	11.1%	0.11138015
5	No trust at all	7	1.7%	0.01694915
97	No answer	5	1.2%	0.01210654
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm4a_4

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The EU
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	The EU
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	7	1.7%	0.01694915
2	High trust	72	17.4%	0.17433414
3	Some trust	182	44.1%	0.44067797
4	Low trust	105	25.4%	0.25423729
5	No trust at all	37	9.0%	0.08958838
97	No answer	10	2.4%	0.02421308
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm4a_5

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The judiciary
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	The judiciary
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	108	26.2%	0.261501211
2	High trust	216	52.3%	0.523002421
3	Some trust	69	16.7%	0.167070218
4	Low trust	11	2.7%	0.026634383
5	No trust at all	3	0.7%	0.007263923
97	No answer	6	1.5%	0.014527845
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm4a_6

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: Politicians
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	Politicians
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	4	1.0%	0.00968523
2	High trust	71	17.2%	0.17191283
3	Some trust	232	56.2%	0.56174334
4	Low trust	91	22.0%	0.22033898
5	No trust at all	10	2.4%	0.02421308
97	No answer	5	1.2%	0.01210654
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm4a_7

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The police
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	The police
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	45	10.9%	0.108958838
2	High trust	263	63.7%	0.636803874
3	Some trust	84	20.3%	0.203389831
4	Low trust	15	3.6%	0.036319613
5	No trust at all	3	0.7%	0.007263923
97	No answer	3	0.7%	0.007263923
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5timespent_r5ocrecsm4a

Variable label:	Time spent on r5ocrecsm4a
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5OCRECSM4A_1 to R5OCRECSM4A_7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1277] [Invalid:4174] [Range:0-85455]

r5ocrecsm4b_1

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The parliament
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	The parliament
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	50	11.3%	0.11312217
2	High trust	240	54.3%	0.54298643
3	Some trust	116	26.2%	0.26244344
4	Low trust	27	6.1%	0.06108597
5	No trust at all	3	0.7%	0.00678733
97	No answer	6	1.4%	0.01357466
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm4b_2

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The county council
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	The county council
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	14	3.2%	0.03167421
2	High trust	130	29.4%	0.29411765
3	Some trust	208	47.1%	0.47058824
4	Low trust	73	16.5%	0.16515837
5	No trust at all	5	1.1%	0.01131222
97	No answer	12	2.7%	0.02714932
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm4b_3

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The municipal council
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	The municipal council
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	15	3.4%	0.03393665
2	High trust	164	37.1%	0.37104072
3	Some trust	192	43.4%	0.43438914
4	Low trust	52	11.8%	0.11764706
5	No trust at all	10	2.3%	0.02262443
97	No answer	9	2.0%	0.02036199
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm4b_4

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The EU
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	The EU
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	4	0.9%	0.009049774
2	High trust	80	18.1%	0.180995475
3	Some trust	179	40.5%	0.404977376
4	Low trust	122	27.6%	0.276018100
5	No trust at all	46	10.4%	0.104072398
97	No answer	11	2.5%	0.024886878
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm4b_5

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The judiciary
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	The judiciary
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	112	25.3%	0.253393665
2	High trust	215	48.6%	0.486425339
3	Some trust	83	18.8%	0.187782805
4	Low trust	19	4.3%	0.042986425
5	No trust at all	4	0.9%	0.009049774
97	No answer	9	2.0%	0.020361991
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm4b_6

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: Politicians
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	Politicians
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	3	0.7%	0.00678733
2	High trust	71	16.1%	0.16063348
3	Some trust	237	53.6%	0.53619910
4	Low trust	106	24.0%	0.23981900
5	No trust at all	16	3.6%	0.03619910
97	No answer	9	2.0%	0.02036199
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm4b_7

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The police
Pre-question text:	How high is your trust in the following institutions?
Literal question:	The police
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	78	17.6%	0.17647059
2	High trust	229	51.8%	0.51809955
3	Some trust	99	22.4%	0.22398190
4	Low trust	24	5.4%	0.05429864
5	No trust at all	6	1.4%	0.01357466
97	No answer	6	1.4%	0.01357466
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5timespent_r5ocrecsm4b

Variable label:	Time spent on r5ocrecsm4b
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5OCRECSM4B_1 to R5OCRECSM4B_7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1277] [Invalid:4174] [Range:0-203152]

r5ocrecsm4c_1

Variable label:	Trust in institutions on a scale: The parliament
Pre-question text:	Please indicate on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of these institutions. 0 means you do not trust the institution at all and 10 means you have complete trust.
Literal question:	The parliament
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not trust at all	4	0.9%	0.009478673
2	1	6	1.4%	0.014218009
3	2	10	2.4%	0.023696682
4	3	9	2.1%	0.021327014
5	4	36	8.5%	0.085308057
6	5	51	12.1%	0.120853081
7	6	51	12.1%	0.120853081
8	7	72	17.1%	0.170616114
9	8	108	25.6%	0.255924171
10	9	37	8.8%	0.087677725
11	10 Complete trust	37	8.8%	0.087677725
97	No answer	1	0.2%	0.002369668
98	Not asked	5029		NA

r5ocrecsm4c_2

Variable label:	Trust in institutions on a scale: The judiciary
Pre-question text:	Please indicate on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of these institutions. 0 means you do not trust the institution at all and 10 means you have complete trust.
Literal question:	The judiciary
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not trust at all	6	1.4%	0.014218009
2	1	3	0.7%	0.007109005
3	2	5	1.2%	0.011848341
4	3	7	1.7%	0.016587678
5	4	18	4.3%	0.042654028
6	5	34	8.1%	0.080568720
7	6	36	8.5%	0.085308057
8	7	67	15.9%	0.158767773
9	8	108	25.6%	0.255924171
10	9	89	21.1%	0.210900474
11	10 Complete trust	49	11.6%	0.116113744
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.000000000
98	Not asked	5029		NA

r5ocrecsm4c_3

Variable label:	Trust in institutions on a scale: The police
Pre-question text:	Please indicate on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of these institutions. 0 means you do not trust the institution at all and 10 means you have complete trust.
Literal question:	The police
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not trust at all	5	1.2%	0.011848341
2	1	2	0.5%	0.004739336
3	2	9	2.1%	0.021327014
4	3	12	2.8%	0.028436019
5	4	20	4.7%	0.047393365
6	5	46	10.9%	0.109004739
7	6	53	12.6%	0.125592417
8	7	71	16.8%	0.168246445
9	8	109	25.8%	0.258293839
10	9	54	12.8%	0.127962085
11	10 Complete trust	40	9.5%	0.094786730
97	No answer	1	0.2%	0.002369668
98	Not asked	5029		NA

r5timespent_r5ocrecsm4c

Variable label:	Time spent on r5ocrecsm4c
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5OCRECSM4C_1 to R5OCRECSM4C_3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1277] [Invalid:4174] [Range:0-1091]

r5k10

Variable label:	Perception of economic situation in Norway
Literal question:	How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? Do you think it is:
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	655	15.7%	0.156923814
2	Good	2107	50.5%	0.504791567
3	Quite good	692	16.6%	0.165788213
4	Neither good nor bad	333	8.0%	0.079779588
5	Quite bad	298	7.1%	0.071394346
6	Bad	71	1.7%	0.017010062
7	Very bad	11	0.3%	0.002635362
97	No answer	7	0.2%	0.001677048
98	Not asked	1277		NA

r5k202

Variable label:	Satisfaction with the current government
Literal question:	How satisfied are you with the current government?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	132	3.2%	0.031624341
2	Satisfied	1121	26.9%	0.268567322
3	Somewhat satisfied	1399	33.5%	0.335170101
4	Slightly satisfied	1118	26.8%	0.267848586
5	Not satisfied at all	390	9.3%	0.093435553
97	No answer	14	0.3%	0.003354097
98	Not asked	1277		NA

r5k11

Variable label:	Satisfaction with the way democracy works in Norway
Literal question:	All in all, how satisfied are you about the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	675	16.2%	0.16171538
2	Satisfied	2268	54.3%	0.54336368
3	Somewhat satisfied	854	20.5%	0.20459990
4	Slightly satisfied	264	6.3%	0.06324868
5	Not satisfied at all	67	1.6%	0.01605175
97	No answer	46	1.1%	0.01102060
98	Not asked	1277		NA

r5pad1

Variable label:	What do you associate with the word democracy [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What do you connect with the word democracy?
Technical description:	We ask you to please write down the first things that come to you when you think about this word. We want all types of answers. A couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you. [Asked if u=2] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5timespent_r5pad1

Variable label:	Time spent on r5pad1
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5PAD1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1431] [Invalid:4020] [Range:2-1133049]

r5k12_1

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The parliament
Pre-question text:	How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
Literal question:	The Norwegian parliament
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	267	6.4%	0.063967417
2	High trust	2059	49.3%	0.493291806
3	Some trust	1461	35.0%	0.350023958
4	Low trust	293	7.0%	0.070196454
5	No trust at all	53	1.3%	0.012697652
97	No answer	41	1.0%	0.009822712
98	Not asked	1277		NA

r5k12_2

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The county council
Pre-question text:	How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
Literal question:	The county council
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	63	1.5%	0.01509344
2	High trust	1136	27.2%	0.27216100
3	Some trust	2188	52.4%	0.52419741
4	Low trust	584	14.0%	0.13991375
5	No trust at all	109	2.6%	0.02611404
97	No answer	94	2.3%	0.02252036
98	Not asked	1277		NA

r5k12_3

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The municipal council
Pre-question text:	How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
Literal question:	The municipal council
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	71	1.7%	0.017010062
2	High trust	1355	32.5%	0.324628654
3	Some trust	2087	50.0%	0.500000000
4	Low trust	551	13.2%	0.132007667
5	No trust at all	70	1.7%	0.016770484
97	No answer	40	1.0%	0.009583134
98	Not asked	1277		NA

r5k12_4

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The EU
Pre-question text:	How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
Literal question:	The EU
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	44	1.1%	0.01054145
2	High trust	705	16.9%	0.16890273
3	Some trust	1860	44.6%	0.44561572
4	Low trust	1155	27.7%	0.27671299
5	No trust at all	354	8.5%	0.08481073
97	No answer	56	1.3%	0.01341639
98	Not asked	1277		NA

r5k12_5

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The judiciary
Pre-question text:	How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
Literal question:	The law courts
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	987	23.6%	0.236463824
2	High trust	2358	56.5%	0.564925731
3	Some trust	624	14.9%	0.149496885
4	Low trust	146	3.5%	0.034978438
5	No trust at all	21	0.5%	0.005031145
97	No answer	38	0.9%	0.009103977
98	Not asked	1277		NA

r5k12_6

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: Politicians
Pre-question text:	How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
Literal question:	Politicians
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	19	0.5%	0.004551989
2	High trust	792	19.0%	0.189746047
3	Some trust	2327	55.7%	0.557498802
4	Low trust	856	20.5%	0.205079061
5	No trust at all	132	3.2%	0.031624341
97	No answer	48	1.1%	0.011499760
98	Not asked	1277		NA

r5k12_7

Variable label:	Trust in institutions: The police
Pre-question text:	How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
Literal question:	The police
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very high trust	596	14.3%	0.142788692
2	High trust	2375	56.9%	0.568998563
3	Some trust	949	22.7%	0.227359847
4	Low trust	193	4.6%	0.046238620
5	No trust at all	26	0.6%	0.006229037
97	No answer	35	0.8%	0.008385242
98	Not asked	1277		NA

r5timespent_r5k12

Variable label:	Time spent on r5k12
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5K12_1 to R5K12_7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4174] [Invalid:1277] [Range:1-915438]

r5k15_1

Variable label:	Statement: Most people can be trusted
Literal question:	Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description:	State your opinion on the scale below. This goes from 0 to 10, where 0 means “Cannot be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be trusted”. [Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Cannot be careful enough	67	1.2%	0.012291323
2	1	43	0.8%	0.007888461
3	2	77	1.4%	0.014125848
4	3	196	3.6%	0.035956705
5	4	224	4.1%	0.041093377
6	5	620	11.4%	0.113740598
7	6	660	12.1%	0.121078701
8	7	1365	25.0%	0.250412768
9	8	1182	21.7%	0.216840947
10	9	494	9.1%	0.090625573
11	10 Most people can be trusted	501	9.2%	0.091909741
97	No answer	22	0.4%	0.004035957

r5k6_1

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Christian Democrats
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Christian Democrats
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	538	9.9%	0.09869749
2	Really dislike	771	14.1%	0.14144194
3	Dislike somewhat	1229	22.5%	0.22546322
4	Neither dislike nor like	1270	23.3%	0.23298477
5	Like somewhat	1106	20.3%	0.20289855
6	Really like	383	7.0%	0.07026234
7	Intensely like	74	1.4%	0.01357549
97	No answer	80	1.5%	0.01467621

r5k6_2

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Conservative Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Conservative Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	188	3.4%	0.03448908
2	Really dislike	601	11.0%	0.11025500
3	Dislike somewhat	976	17.9%	0.17904972
4	Neither dislike nor like	759	13.9%	0.13924051
5	Like somewhat	1450	26.6%	0.26600624
6	Really like	1135	20.8%	0.20821868
7	Intensely like	263	4.8%	0.04824803
97	No answer	79	1.4%	0.01449275

r5k6_3

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Progress Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Progress Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	1535	28.2%	0.28159971
2	Really dislike	1039	19.1%	0.19060723
3	Dislike somewhat	821	15.1%	0.15061457
4	Neither dislike nor like	505	9.3%	0.09264355
5	Like somewhat	854	15.7%	0.15666850
6	Really like	462	8.5%	0.08475509
7	Intensely like	155	2.8%	0.02843515
97	No answer	80	1.5%	0.01467621

r5k6_4

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Liberal Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	289	5.3%	0.05301779
2	Really dislike	548	10.1%	0.10053201
3	Dislike somewhat	1005	18.4%	0.18436984
4	Neither dislike nor like	1470	27.0%	0.26967529
5	Like somewhat	1464	26.9%	0.26857457
6	Really like	486	8.9%	0.08915795
7	Intensely like	87	1.6%	0.01596037
97	No answer	102	1.9%	0.01871216

r5k6_5

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Socialist Left Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Socialist Left Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	794	14.6%	0.14566135
2	Really dislike	845	15.5%	0.15501743
3	Dislike somewhat	928	17.0%	0.17024399
4	Neither dislike nor like	1101	20.2%	0.20198129
5	Like somewhat	1017	18.7%	0.18657127
6	Really like	538	9.9%	0.09869749
7	Intensely like	143	2.6%	0.02623372
97	No answer	85	1.6%	0.01559347

r5k6_6

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Centre Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Centre Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	274	5.0%	0.05026601
2	Really dislike	523	9.6%	0.09594570
3	Dislike somewhat	1067	19.6%	0.19574390
4	Neither dislike nor like	1758	32.3%	0.32250963
5	Like somewhat	1241	22.8%	0.22766465
6	Really like	407	7.5%	0.07466520
7	Intensely like	83	1.5%	0.01522656
97	No answer	98	1.8%	0.01797835

r5k6_7

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Green Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Green Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	837	15.4%	0.15354981
2	Really dislike	723	13.3%	0.13263621
3	Dislike somewhat	871	16.0%	0.15978720
4	Neither dislike nor like	1051	19.3%	0.19280866
5	Like somewhat	1204	22.1%	0.22087690
6	Really like	556	10.2%	0.10199963
7	Intensely like	122	2.2%	0.02238121
97	No answer	87	1.6%	0.01596037

r5k6_8

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Labour Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Labour Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	183	3.4%	0.03357182
2	Really dislike	329	6.0%	0.06035590
3	Dislike somewhat	696	12.8%	0.12768299
4	Neither dislike nor like	706	13.0%	0.12951752
5	Like somewhat	1566	28.7%	0.28728674
6	Really like	1515	27.8%	0.27793065
7	Intensely like	377	6.9%	0.06916162
97	No answer	79	1.4%	0.01449275

r5k6_9

Variable label:	Like or dislike: The Red Party
Pre-question text:	We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
Literal question:	The Red Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Intensely dislike	1148	21.1%	0.21060356
2	Really dislike	959	17.6%	0.17593102
3	Dislike somewhat	816	15.0%	0.14969730
4	Neither dislike nor like	1240	22.7%	0.22748120
5	Like somewhat	780	14.3%	0.14309301
6	Really like	320	5.9%	0.05870482
7	Intensely like	87	1.6%	0.01596037
97	No answer	101	1.9%	0.01852871

r5k8_1

Variable label:	Placement on political scale
Pre-question text:	In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those that are politically on the far left, and10 represents those that are politically on the far right.
Literal question:	Where would you position yourself on such a scale?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	93	1.7%	0.01706109
2	1	168	3.1%	0.03082003
3	2	435	8.0%	0.07980187
4	3	767	14.1%	0.14070813
5	4	651	11.9%	0.11942763
6	5	896	16.4%	0.16437351
7	6	649	11.9%	0.11906072
8	7	835	15.3%	0.15318290
9	8	595	10.9%	0.10915428
10	9	175	3.2%	0.03210420
11	10 Right	129	2.4%	0.02366538
97	No answer	58	1.1%	0.01064025

r5k9_1

Variable label:	[1] most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally? Please Write down the three most important issues, where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5k9_2

Variable label:	[2] most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally? Please Write down the three most important issues, where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5k9_3

Variable label:	[3] most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally? Please Write down the three most important issues, where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5dt16_1

Variable label:	Placement on political scale: The Christian Democrats
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Christian Democrats
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	51	0.9%	0.009356081
2	1	49	0.9%	0.008989176
3	2	132	2.4%	0.024215740
4	3	266	4.9%	0.048798386
5	4	626	11.5%	0.114841314
6	5	1467	26.9%	0.269124931
7	6	1203	22.1%	0.220693451
8	7	809	14.8%	0.148413135
9	8	356	6.5%	0.065309118
10	9	117	2.1%	0.021463952
11	10 Right	66	1.2%	0.012107870
97	No answer	309	5.7%	0.056686846

r5dt16_2

Variable label:	Placement on political scale: The Conservative Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Conservative Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	6	0.1%	0.001100715
2	1	13	0.2%	0.002384884
3	2	9	0.2%	0.001651073
4	3	20	0.4%	0.003669052
5	4	35	0.6%	0.006420840
6	5	135	2.5%	0.024766098
7	6	236	4.3%	0.043294808
8	7	792	14.5%	0.145294441
9	8	1613	29.6%	0.295909008
10	9	1394	25.6%	0.255732893
11	10 Right	914	16.8%	0.167675656
97	No answer	284	5.2%	0.052100532

r5dt16_3

Variable label:	Placement on political scale: The Progress Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Progress Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	21	0.4%	0.003852504
2	1	17	0.3%	0.003118694
3	2	24	0.4%	0.004402862
4	3	33	0.6%	0.006053935
5	4	54	1.0%	0.009906439
6	5	165	3.0%	0.030269675
7	6	104	1.9%	0.019079068
8	7	229	4.2%	0.042010640
9	8	618	11.3%	0.113373693
10	9	1291	23.7%	0.236837278
11	10 Right	2615	48.0%	0.479728490
97	No answer	280	5.1%	0.051366722

r5dt16_4

Variable label:	Placement on political scale: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Liberal Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	427	7.8%	0.078334251
2	1	252	4.6%	0.046230050
3	2	385	7.1%	0.070629242
4	3	497	9.1%	0.091175931
5	4	574	10.5%	0.105301779
6	5	1069	19.6%	0.196110805
7	6	1026	18.8%	0.188222345
8	7	605	11.1%	0.110988809
9	8	214	3.9%	0.039258852
10	9	78	1.4%	0.014309301
11	10 Right	37	0.7%	0.006787745
97	No answer	287	5.3%	0.052650890

r5dt16_5

Variable label:	Placement on political scale: The Socialist Left Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Socialist Left Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	790	14.5%	0.1449275362
2	1	1745	32.0%	0.3201247478
3	2	1507	27.6%	0.2764630343
4	3	658	12.1%	0.1207117960
5	4	196	3.6%	0.0359567052
6	5	184	3.4%	0.0337552743
7	6	40	0.7%	0.0073381031
8	7	13	0.2%	0.0023848835
9	8	17	0.3%	0.0031186938
10	9	13	0.2%	0.0023848835
11	10 Right	4	0.1%	0.0007338103
97	No answer	284	5.2%	0.0521005320

r5dt16_6

Variable label:	Placement on political scale: The Centre Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Centre Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	52	1.0%	0.009539534
2	1	87	1.6%	0.015960374
3	2	285	5.2%	0.052283985
4	3	636	11.7%	0.116675839
5	4	1205	22.1%	0.221060356
6	5	1777	32.6%	0.325995230
7	6	678	12.4%	0.124380848
8	7	290	5.3%	0.053201247
9	8	85	1.6%	0.015593469
10	9	27	0.5%	0.004953220
11	10 Right	18	0.3%	0.003302146
97	No answer	311	5.7%	0.057053752

r5dt16_7

Variable label:	Placement on political scale: The Green Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Green Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	483	8.9%	0.088607595
2	1	575	10.5%	0.105485232
3	2	790	14.5%	0.144927536
4	3	975	17.9%	0.178866263
5	4	942	17.3%	0.172812328
6	5	1036	19.0%	0.190056870
7	6	178	3.3%	0.032654559
8	7	73	1.3%	0.013392038
9	8	28	0.5%	0.005136672
10	9	14	0.3%	0.002568336
11	10 Right	17	0.3%	0.003118694
97	No answer	340	6.2%	0.062373876

r5dt16_8

Variable label:	Placement on political scale: The Labour Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Labour Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	134	2.5%	0.024582645
2	1	235	4.3%	0.043111356
3	2	681	12.5%	0.124931205
4	3	1201	22.0%	0.220326546
5	4	1185	21.7%	0.217391304
6	5	1021	18.7%	0.187305082
7	6	415	7.6%	0.076132820
8	7	169	3.1%	0.031003486
9	8	85	1.6%	0.015593469
10	9	24	0.4%	0.004402862
11	10 Right	24	0.4%	0.004402862
97	No answer	277	5.1%	0.050816364

r5dt16_9

Variable label:	Placement on political scale: The Red Party
Pre-question text:	In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
Literal question:	The Red Party
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Left	3123	57.3%	0.572922400
2	1	1029	18.9%	0.188772702
3	2	339	6.2%	0.062190424
4	3	172	3.2%	0.031553843
5	4	110	2.0%	0.020179784
6	5	215	3.9%	0.039442304
7	6	46	0.8%	0.008438819
8	7	43	0.8%	0.007888461
9	8	22	0.4%	0.004035957
10	9	26	0.5%	0.004769767
11	10 Right	27	0.5%	0.004953220
97	No answer	299	5.5%	0.054852321

r5dv30_1

Variable label:	Statement: The tax burden should be lowered
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to cutbacks in the welfare state.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	153	2.8%	0.028068244
2	Agree	287	5.3%	0.052650890
3	Agree somewhat	701	12.9%	0.128600257
4	Neither agree nor disagree	604	11.1%	0.110805357
5	Disagree somewhat	978	17.9%	0.179416621
6	Disagree	1428	26.2%	0.261970281
7	Strongly disagree	1255	23.0%	0.230232985
97	No answer	45	0.8%	0.008255366

r5dv30_2

Variable label:	Statement: Commercial private schools should be allowed
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Commercial private schools should be allowed.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	323	5.9%	0.059255183
2	Agree	840	15.4%	0.154100165
3	Agree somewhat	1030	18.9%	0.188956155
4	Neither agree nor disagree	650	11.9%	0.119244175
5	Disagree somewhat	839	15.4%	0.153916713
6	Disagree	863	15.8%	0.158319574
7	Strongly disagree	860	15.8%	0.157769217
97	No answer	46	0.8%	0.008438819

r5dv30_3

Variable label:	Statement: Many public activities could be done better and cheaper by the private sector
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Many public activities could have been carried out both with better results and at a lower cost if they were run by the private sector.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	383	7.0%	0.07026234
2	Agree	735	13.5%	0.13483764
3	Agree somewhat	1320	24.2%	0.24215740
4	Neither agree nor disagree	559	10.3%	0.10254999
5	Disagree somewhat	758	13.9%	0.13905705
6	Disagree	928	17.0%	0.17024399
7	Strongly disagree	733	13.4%	0.13447074
97	No answer	35	0.6%	0.00642084

r5timespent_r5dv30

Variable label:	Time spent on r5dv30
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5DV30_1 to R5DV30_3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-522568]

r5dv31_1

Variable label:	Statement: The state should help reduce income disparities
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	The government should contribute towards reducing income differences in society.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	776	14.2%	0.14235920
2	Agree	1438	26.4%	0.26380481
3	Agree somewhat	1469	26.9%	0.26949184
4	Neither agree nor disagree	647	11.9%	0.11869382
5	Disagree somewhat	581	10.7%	0.10658595
6	Disagree	331	6.1%	0.06072280
7	Strongly disagree	127	2.3%	0.02329848
97	No answer	82	1.5%	0.01504311

r5dv31_2

Variable label:	Statement: It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different religions and beliefs
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different religions and beliefs.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	433	7.9%	0.07943497
2	Agree	1168	21.4%	0.21427261
3	Agree somewhat	1089	20.0%	0.19977986
4	Neither agree nor disagree	842	15.4%	0.15446707
5	Disagree somewhat	829	15.2%	0.15208219
6	Disagree	603	11.1%	0.11062190
7	Strongly disagree	405	7.4%	0.07429829
97	No answer	82	1.5%	0.01504311

r5dv31_3

Variable label:	Statement: Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has committed to should be carried out abroad
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has committed to should be carried out abroad
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	178	3.3%	0.03265456
2	Agree	385	7.1%	0.07062924
3	Agree somewhat	622	11.4%	0.11410750
4	Neither agree nor disagree	1299	23.8%	0.23830490
5	Disagree somewhat	987	18.1%	0.18106769
6	Disagree	1302	23.9%	0.23885526
7	Strongly disagree	575	10.5%	0.10548523
97	No answer	103	1.9%	0.01889562

r5dvh_1

Variable label:	Statement: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and Vesterålen areas
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and Vesterålen areas.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	1133	20.8%	0.20785177
2	Agree	969	17.8%	0.17776555
3	Agree somewhat	611	11.2%	0.11208952
4	Neither agree nor disagree	977	17.9%	0.17923317
5	Disagree somewhat	697	12.8%	0.12786645
6	Disagree	668	12.3%	0.12254632
7	Strongly disagree	333	6.1%	0.06108971
97	No answer	63	1.2%	0.01155751

r5dvh_2

Variable label:	Statement: Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	350	6.4%	0.06420840
2	Agree	790	14.5%	0.14492754
3	Agree somewhat	951	17.4%	0.17446340
4	Neither agree nor disagree	482	8.8%	0.08842414
5	Disagree somewhat	1126	20.7%	0.20656760
6	Disagree	985	18.1%	0.18070079
7	Strongly disagree	711	13.0%	0.13043478
97	No answer	56	1.0%	0.01027334

r5dvh_3

Variable label:	Statement: Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	2316	42.5%	0.424876170
2	Agree	1609	29.5%	0.295175197
3	Agree somewhat	436	8.0%	0.079985324
4	Neither agree nor disagree	368	6.8%	0.067510549
5	Disagree somewhat	269	4.9%	0.049348743
6	Disagree	210	3.9%	0.038525041
7	Strongly disagree	189	3.5%	0.034672537
97	No answer	54	1.0%	0.009906439

r5nfc_1

Variable label:	Statement: I prefer complicated rather than easy tasks
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	I prefer complicated rather than easy tasks
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	362	6.6%	0.066409833
2	Agree	1439	26.4%	0.263988259
3	Agree somewhat	1643	30.1%	0.301412585
4	Neither agree nor disagree	1277	23.4%	0.234268941
5	Disagree somewhat	423	7.8%	0.077600440
6	Disagree	176	3.2%	0.032287654
7	Strongly disagree	37	0.7%	0.006787745
97	No answer	94	1.7%	0.017244542

r5nfc_2

Variable label:	Statement: I really like tasks where the idea is to come up with new solutions
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	I really like tasks where the idea is to come up with new solutions.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	776	14.2%	0.142359200
2	Agree	2315	42.5%	0.424692717
3	Agree somewhat	1449	26.6%	0.265822785
4	Neither agree nor disagree	619	11.4%	0.113557145
5	Disagree somewhat	154	2.8%	0.028251697
6	Disagree	40	0.7%	0.007338103
7	Strongly disagree	10	0.2%	0.001834526
97	No answer	88	1.6%	0.016143827

r5nfc_3

Variable label:	Statement: I would prefer a task that is intellectual and complex rather than one that needs little thought
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	I would prefer a task that is intellectual and complex rather than one that needs little thought.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	614	11.3%	0.112639883
2	Agree	1826	33.5%	0.334984407
3	Agree somewhat	1321	24.2%	0.242340855
4	Neither agree nor disagree	1057	19.4%	0.193909374
5	Disagree somewhat	344	6.3%	0.063107687
6	Disagree	168	3.1%	0.030820033
7	Strongly disagree	25	0.5%	0.004586314
97	No answer	96	1.8%	0.017611447

r5nte_1

Variable label:	Statement: I have an opinion about most things
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	I have an opinion about most things
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	333	6.1%	0.061089708
2	Agree	1526	28.0%	0.279948633
3	Agree somewhat	2008	36.8%	0.368372776
4	Neither agree nor disagree	697	12.8%	0.127866447
5	Disagree somewhat	568	10.4%	0.104201064
6	Disagree	243	4.5%	0.044578976
7	Strongly disagree	31	0.6%	0.005687030
97	No answer	45	0.8%	0.008255366

r5nte_2

Variable label:	Statement: I think it is important to have a view on whether something is right or wrong
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	I think it is important to have a view on whether something is right or wrong
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	1158	21.2%	0.212438085
2	Agree	2382	43.7%	0.436984040
3	Agree somewhat	1121	20.6%	0.205650339
4	Neither agree nor disagree	437	8.0%	0.080168776
5	Disagree somewhat	210	3.9%	0.038525041
6	Disagree	76	1.4%	0.013942396
7	Strongly disagree	21	0.4%	0.003852504
97	No answer	46	0.8%	0.008438819

r5km1

Variable label:	Climate change: What should be done [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What do you think should be done about climate change?
Technical description:	Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you. [Asked if u=1 OR u=3 OR u=4] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5timespent_r5km1

Variable label:	Time spent on r5km1
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5KM1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4007] [Invalid:1444] [Range:2-657056]

r5km5

Variable label:	To what extent do you think it is possible to prevent harmful climate change
Literal question:	Let us assume that climate change can be a major problem for the world in the future if nothing is done about it. To what extent do you think it is possible to prevent harmful climate change? Choose the statement that best matches your viewpoint:
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 OR u=3 OR u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	It is impossible to prevent harmful climate change.	353	8.8%	0.087810945
2	It is possible, but very difficult, to prevent harmful climate change.	2502	62.2%	0.622388060
3	It is possible and entirely realistic to prevent harmful climate change.	1086	27.0%	0.270149254
4	It is easy to prevent harmful climate change.	20	0.5%	0.004975124
97	No answer	59	1.5%	0.014676617
98	Not asked	1431		NA

r5fr1_1

Variable label:	Volunteering: Arts and Culture, bands and choirs
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums, collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and artistic activities]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums, collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and artistic activities]	209	15.8%	0.157735849
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1110	83.8%	0.837735849

r5fr1_2

Variable label:	Volunteering: Athletics and sport
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle club, company sports and disabled sports]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle club, company sports and disabled sports]	283	21.4%	0.213584906
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1036	78.2%	0.781886792

r5fr1_3

Variable label:	Volunteering: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts. Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners’ clubs. Student societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and recreational activities]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts. Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners' clubs. Student societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and recreational activities]	237	17.9%	0.178867925
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1082	81.7%	0.816603774

r5fr1_4

Variable label:	Volunteering: Education, training and research
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools. Universities and university colleges. Vocational/technical education. Adult education and further education. Research and development]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools. Universities and university colleges. Vocational/t	145	10.9%	0.109433962
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1174	88.6%	0.886037736

r5fr1_5

Variable label:	Volunteering: Health, nursing and rescue work
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home. Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions. Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and ambulance services]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home. Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions. Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and ambulance services]	69	5.2%	0.052075472
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1250	94.3%	0.943396226

r5fr1_6

Variable label:	Volunteering: Social services and substance abuse care
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People’s Aid. Family counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled. Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer centres]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People's Aid. Family counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled. Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer ce	87	6.6%	0.065660377
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1232	93.0%	0.929811321

r5fr1_7

Variable label:	Volunteering: Nature, environmental and animal protection
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection. Veterinary services]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection. Veterinary services]	41	3.1%	0.030943396
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1278	96.5%	0.964528302

r5fr1_8

Variable label:	Volunteering: Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood [Meeting house]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood [Meeting house]	188	14.2%	0.141886792
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1131	85.4%	0.853584906

r5fr1_9

Variable label:	Volunteering: Housing co-operatives and housing associations
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]	149	11.2%	0.112452830
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1170	88.3%	0.883018868

r5fr1_10

Variable label:	Volunteering: Rights, support and advocacy work
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women’s rights. Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners, the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women's rights. Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners, the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]	44	3.3%	0.033207547
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1275	96.2%	0.962264151

r5fr1_11

Variable label:	Volunteering: Political parties
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Political parties [Youth political parties]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Political parties [Youth political parties]	40	3.0%	0.030188679
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1279	96.5%	0.965283019

r5fr1_12

Variable label:	Volunteering: International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work [International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work [International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]	54	4.1%	0.040754717
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1265	95.5%	0.954716981

r5fr1_13

Variable label:	Volunteering: Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations. Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations. Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]	101	7.6%	0.076226415
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1218	91.9%	0.919245283

r5fr1_14

Variable label:	Volunteering: Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the Norwegian Humanist Association] (14)
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the Norwegian Humanist Association]	103	7.8%	0.077735849
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1216	91.8%	0.917735849

r5fr1_15

Variable label:	Volunteering: Immigrant organisations
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background, culture, identity outside Norway]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background, culture, identity outside Norway]	10	0.8%	0.007547170
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1309	98.8%	0.987924528

r5fr1_16

Variable label:	Volunteering: Other, specify
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Other, specify
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Other, specify	35	2.6%	0.026415094
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		1284	96.9%	0.969056604

r5fr1_17

Variable label:	No, not volunteering
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	No
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	422	31.8%	0.318490566
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		897	67.7%	0.676981132

r5fr1_16_other

Variable label:	Volunteering: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text:	During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
Literal question:	Other, specify
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5utfortfrivilligarbeid

Variable label:	Done voluntary work?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1. Selects respondents who has answered positively on one or more categories in R5FR1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	465	35.1%	0.350943396
1	Yes	854	64.5%	0.644528302
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5flereorg

Variable label:	Done voluntary work for more then one organization?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1. Selects respondents who has answered positively on more than one category in R5FR1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	810	61.1%	0.611320755
1	Yes	509	38.4%	0.384150943
97	No answer	6	0.5%	0.004528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr17

Variable label:	How much time spent volunteering
Literal question:	If you think about the last four weeks, roughly how much time did you spend on voluntary work?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and utfortFrivilligArbeid=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Note the number of hours	560	65.6%	0.655737705
2	Have not done any voluntary work in the last four weeks	286	33.5%	0.334894614
97	No answer	8	0.9%	0.009367681
98	Not asked	4597		NA

r5fr17_1_other

Variable label:	How much time spent volunteering, hours
Literal question:	If you think about the last four weeks, roughly how much time did you spend on voluntary work?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and utfortFrivilligArbeid=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5fri31ag_1

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Satisfactory
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Satisfactory
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	169	12.8%	0.127547170
2	Well	598	45.1%	0.451320755
3	Quite well	271	20.5%	0.204528302
4	Neither well nor poorly	162	12.2%	0.122264151
5	Quite poorly	8	0.6%	0.006037736
6	Poorly	6	0.5%	0.004528302
7	Very poorly	9	0.7%	0.006792453
97	No answer	102	7.7%	0.076981132
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fri31ag_2

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Rewarding
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Rewarding
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	228	17.2%	0.172075472
2	Well	601	45.4%	0.453584906
3	Quite well	252	19.0%	0.190188679
4	Neither well nor poorly	127	9.6%	0.095849057
5	Quite poorly	9	0.7%	0.006792453
6	Poorly	7	0.5%	0.005283019
7	Very poorly	7	0.5%	0.005283019
97	No answer	94	7.1%	0.070943396
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fri31ag_3

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Exciting
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Exciting
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	104	7.8%	0.078490566
2	Well	368	27.8%	0.277735849
3	Quite well	321	24.2%	0.242264151
4	Neither well nor poorly	326	24.6%	0.246037736
5	Quite poorly	58	4.4%	0.043773585
6	Poorly	20	1.5%	0.015094340
7	Very poorly	9	0.7%	0.006792453
97	No answer	119	9.0%	0.089811321
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fri31ag_4

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Important
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Important
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	408	30.8%	0.307924528
2	Well	543	41.0%	0.409811321
3	Quite well	175	13.2%	0.132075472
4	Neither well nor poorly	101	7.6%	0.076226415
5	Quite poorly	6	0.5%	0.004528302
6	Poorly	1	0.1%	0.000754717
7	Very poorly	3	0.2%	0.002264151
97	No answer	88	6.6%	0.066415094
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fri31ag_5

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Fun
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Fun
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	105	7.9%	0.079245283
2	Well	387	29.2%	0.292075472
3	Quite well	380	28.7%	0.286792453
4	Neither well nor poorly	272	20.5%	0.205283019
5	Quite poorly	45	3.4%	0.033962264
6	Poorly	15	1.1%	0.011320755
7	Very poorly	8	0.6%	0.006037736
97	No answer	113	8.5%	0.085283019
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fri31ag_6

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Challenging
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Challenging
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	111	8.4%	0.083773585
2	Well	386	29.1%	0.291320755
3	Quite well	308	23.2%	0.232452830
4	Neither well nor poorly	309	23.3%	0.233207547
5	Quite poorly	60	4.5%	0.045283019
6	Poorly	22	1.7%	0.016603774
7	Very poorly	13	1.0%	0.009811321
97	No answer	116	8.8%	0.087547170
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fri31ag_7

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Disappointing
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Disappointing
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	4	0.3%	0.003018868
2	Well	26	2.0%	0.019622642
3	Quite well	66	5.0%	0.049811321
4	Neither well nor poorly	379	28.6%	0.286037736
5	Quite poorly	164	12.4%	0.123773585
6	Poorly	326	24.6%	0.246037736
7	Very poorly	213	16.1%	0.160754717
97	No answer	147	11.1%	0.110943396
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr31hm_1

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Emotionally exhausting
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Emotionally exhausting
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	19	1.4%	0.01433962
2	Well	86	6.5%	0.06490566
3	Quite well	192	14.5%	0.14490566
4	Neither well nor poorly	376	28.4%	0.28377358
5	Quite poorly	150	11.3%	0.11320755
6	Poorly	258	19.5%	0.19471698
7	Very poorly	131	9.9%	0.09886792
97	No answer	113	8.5%	0.08528302
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr31hm_2

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Physically tiring
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Physically tiring
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	12	0.9%	0.009056604
2	Well	86	6.5%	0.064905660
3	Quite well	217	16.4%	0.163773585
4	Neither well nor poorly	414	31.2%	0.312452830
5	Quite poorly	159	12.0%	0.120000000
6	Poorly	244	18.4%	0.184150943
7	Very poorly	76	5.7%	0.057358491
97	No answer	117	8.8%	0.088301887
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr31hm_3

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Frustrating
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Frustrating
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	7	0.5%	0.005283019
2	Well	53	4.0%	0.040000000
3	Quite well	182	13.7%	0.137358491
4	Neither well nor poorly	391	29.5%	0.295094340
5	Quite poorly	181	13.7%	0.136603774
6	Poorly	269	20.3%	0.203018868
7	Very poorly	124	9.4%	0.093584906
97	No answer	118	8.9%	0.089056604
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr31hm_4

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Depressing
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Depressing
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	2	0.2%	0.001509434
2	Well	16	1.2%	0.012075472
3	Quite well	60	4.5%	0.045283019
4	Neither well nor poorly	342	25.8%	0.258113208
5	Quite poorly	151	11.4%	0.113962264
6	Poorly	354	26.7%	0.267169811
7	Very poorly	270	20.4%	0.203773585
97	No answer	130	9.8%	0.098113208
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr31hm_5

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Time consuming
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Time consuming
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	68	5.1%	0.05132075
2	Well	280	21.1%	0.21132075
3	Quite well	323	24.4%	0.24377358
4	Neither well nor poorly	327	24.7%	0.24679245
5	Quite poorly	91	6.9%	0.06867925
6	Poorly	92	6.9%	0.06943396
7	Very poorly	35	2.6%	0.02641509
97	No answer	109	8.2%	0.08226415
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr31hm_6

Variable label:	Describing volunteer work: Easy
Pre-question text:	If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
Literal question:	Easy
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very well	41	3.1%	0.030943396
2	Well	217	16.4%	0.163773585
3	Quite well	243	18.3%	0.183396226
4	Neither well nor poorly	528	39.8%	0.398490566
5	Quite poorly	126	9.5%	0.095094340
6	Poorly	51	3.8%	0.038490566
7	Very poorly	13	1.0%	0.009811321
97	No answer	106	8.0%	0.080000000
98	Not asked	4126		NA

fr30_4

Variable label:	I want to do more voluntary work
Literal question:	I want to do more voluntary work
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and utfortFrivilligArbeid=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	49	5.7%	0.057377049
2	Agree	213	24.9%	0.249414520
3	Agree somewhat	252	29.5%	0.295081967
4	Neither agree nor disagree	217	25.4%	0.254098361
5	Disagree somewhat	62	7.3%	0.072599532
6	Disagree	50	5.9%	0.058548009
7	Strongly disagree	8	0.9%	0.009367681
97	No answer	3	0.4%	0.003512881
98	Not asked	4597		NA

r5fr19

Variable label:	Could you imagine doing voluntary work?
Literal question:	Could you imagine doing voluntary work?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and utfortFrivilligArbeid=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	334	71.8%	0.71827957
2	No	121	26.0%	0.26021505
97	No answer	10	2.2%	0.02150538
98	Not asked	4986		NA

r5fr20

Variable label:	Considering quitting with volunteering
Literal question:	Do you sometimes consider stopping doing voluntary work for one or more organisations where you are currently active?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR1_17!=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	217	24.7%	0.24687144
2	No	638	72.6%	0.72582480
97	No answer	24	2.7%	0.02730375
98	Not asked	4572		NA

r5fr21

Variable label:	Considering quitting in the following organization
Literal question:	What organisation are you considering stopping doing voluntary work for?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and flereOrg=1 AND R5FR20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums, collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and artistic activities]	21	14.9%	0.148936170
2	Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle club, company sports and disabled sports]	21	14.9%	0.148936170
3	Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts. Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners' clubs. Student societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and recreational activities]	12	8.5%	0.085106383
4	Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools. Universities and University colleges. Vocational/t	10	7.1%	0.070921986
5	Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home. Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions. Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and ambulance services]	4	2.8%	0.028368794
6	Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People's Aid. Family counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled. Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer ce	3	2.1%	0.021276596
7	Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection. Veterinary services]	0	0.0%	0.000000000
8	Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood [Meeting house]	15	10.6%	0.106382979
9	Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]	12	8.5%	0.085106383
10	Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women's rights. Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners, the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]	2	1.4%	0.014184397
11	Political parties [Youth political parties]	4	2.8%	0.028368794
12	International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work [International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]	3	2.1%	0.021276596
13	Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations. Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]	19	13.5%	0.134751773
14	Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the Norwegian Humanist Association]	3	2.1%	0.021276596
15	Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background, culture, identity outside Norway]	1	0.7%	0.007092199
16	Other, specify	4	2.8%	0.028368794
17	No	0	0.0%	0.000000000
97	No answer	7	5.0%	0.049645390
98	Not asked	5310		NA

r5fr21_16_other

Variable label:	Considering quitting in the following organization, other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What organisation are you considering stopping doing voluntary work for?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and flereOrg=1 AND R5FR20=1] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5fr22

Variable label:	How long have you been doing volunteer work within this organization
Literal question:	How long have you been doing voluntary work within this organisation?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Less than a month	6	2.8%	0.02764977
2	One month-six months	6	2.8%	0.02764977
3	Six months-one year	12	5.5%	0.05529954
4	1-2 years	45	20.7%	0.20737327
5	3-5 years	58	26.7%	0.26728111
6	6-10 years	41	18.9%	0.18894009
7	11-25 years	32	14.7%	0.14746544
8	More than 25 years	14	6.5%	0.06451613
97	No answer	3	1.4%	0.01382488
98	Not asked	5234		NA

r5fr23_1

Variable label:	Considering quitting volunteer work: Changed life situation
Pre-question text:	Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
Literal question:	Changed life situation (work, situation at home, relocation, children becoming older etc.)
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Changed life situation (work, situation at home, relocation, children becoming older etc.)	83	38.2%	0.3824885
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	5234		NA
0		134	61.8%	0.6175115

r5fr23_2

Variable label:	Considering quitting volunteer work: Changed interest or motivation
Pre-question text:	Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
Literal question:	Changed interest or motivation
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Changed interest or motivation	100	46.1%	0.4608295
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	5234		NA
0		117	53.9%	0.5391705

r5fr23_3

Variable label:	Considering quitting volunteer work: Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work
Pre-question text:	Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
Literal question:	Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work	39	18.0%	0.1797235
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	5234		NA
0		178	82.0%	0.8202765

r5fr23_4

Variable label:	Considering quitting volunteer work: Something else
Pre-question text:	Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
Literal question:	Something else (please specify)
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Something else (please specify)	37	17.1%	0.1705069
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	5234		NA
0		180	82.9%	0.8294931

r5fr23_4_other

Variable label:	Considering quitting volunteer work: Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text:	Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
Literal question:	Other
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR20=1] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5fr24_1

Variable label:	Considering quitting volunteer work because of life situation: Not enough time
Pre-question text:	What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider stopping voluntary work?
Literal question:	Not enough time
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR23_1=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Not enough time	51	61.4%	0.6144578
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	5368		NA
0		32	38.6%	0.3855422

r5fr24_2

Variable label:	Considering quitting volunteer work because of life situation: Moving away from the area
Pre-question text:	What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider stopping voluntary work?
Literal question:	Moving away from the area
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR23_1=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Moving away from the area	13	15.7%	0.1566265
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	5368		NA
0		70	84.3%	0.8433735

r5fr24_3

Variable label:	Considering quitting volunteer work because of life situation: Children stopping the activities
Pre-question text:	What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider stopping voluntary work?
Literal question:	Children stopping the activities
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR23_1=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Children stopping the activities	19	22.9%	0.2289157
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	5368		NA
0		64	77.1%	0.7710843

r5fr24_4

Variable label:	Considering quitting volunteer work because of life situation: Health problems or old age
Pre-question text:	What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider stopping voluntary work?
Literal question:	Health problems or old age
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR23_1=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Health problems or old age	15	18.1%	0.1807229
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	5368		NA
0		68	81.9%	0.8192771

r5fr24_5

Variable label:	Considering quitting volunteer work because of life situation: Other
Pre-question text:	What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider stopping voluntary work?
Literal question:	Other
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR23_1=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Other, specify	6	7.2%	0.07228916
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	5368		NA
0		77	92.8%	0.92771084

r5fr24_5_other

Variable label:	Considering quitting volunteer work because of life situation: Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text:	What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider stopping voluntary work?
Literal question:	Other
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 and R5FR23_1=1] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5fr32

Variable label:	Satisfied with life
Literal question:	To what extent are you satisfied with life at the moment?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Highly satisfied	242	18.3%	0.182641509
2	Very satisfied	733	55.3%	0.553207547
3	Fairly satisfied	279	21.1%	0.210566038
4	Not very satisfied	47	3.5%	0.035471698
5	Not at all satisfied	9	0.7%	0.006792453
97	No answer	15	1.1%	0.011320755
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr33

Variable label:	Think that what you’re doing in life is meaningful
Literal question:	All in all, to what extent do you think that what you are doing in life is meaningful?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Highly meaningful	239	18.0%	0.180377358
2	Very meaningful	691	52.2%	0.521509434
3	Fairly meaningful	308	23.2%	0.232452830
4	Not very meaningful	47	3.5%	0.035471698
5	Not at all meaningful	8	0.6%	0.006037736
97	No answer	32	2.4%	0.024150943
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr34_1

Variable label:	0-10: scale for happy
Pre-question text:	On a scale of 0-10, how were you yesterday?
Literal question:	Happy
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not at all	11	0.8%	0.008301887
2	1	13	1.0%	0.009811321
3	2	38	2.9%	0.028679245
4	3	57	4.3%	0.043018868
5	4	64	4.8%	0.048301887
6	5	145	10.9%	0.109433962
7	6	182	13.7%	0.137358491
8	7	269	20.3%	0.203018868
9	8	290	21.9%	0.218867925
10	9	159	12.0%	0.120000000
11	10 All the time	58	4.4%	0.043773585
97	No answer	39	2.9%	0.029433962
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr34_2

Variable label:	0-10: scale for concerned
Pre-question text:	On a scale of 0-10, how were you yesterday?
Literal question:	Concerned
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not at all	141	10.6%	0.106415094
2	1	169	12.8%	0.127547170
3	2	216	16.3%	0.163018868
4	3	158	11.9%	0.119245283
5	4	137	10.3%	0.103396226
6	5	166	12.5%	0.125283019
7	6	90	6.8%	0.067924528
8	7	86	6.5%	0.064905660
9	8	56	4.2%	0.042264151
10	9	24	1.8%	0.018113208
11	10 All the time	7	0.5%	0.005283019
97	No answer	75	5.7%	0.056603774
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr34_3

Variable label:	0-10: scale for depressed
Pre-question text:	On a scale of 0-10, how were you yesterday?
Literal question:	Depressed
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not at all	663	50.0%	0.500377358
2	1	183	13.8%	0.138113208
3	2	123	9.3%	0.092830189
4	3	71	5.4%	0.053584906
5	4	43	3.2%	0.032452830
6	5	61	4.6%	0.046037736
7	6	32	2.4%	0.024150943
8	7	30	2.3%	0.022641509
9	8	16	1.2%	0.012075472
10	9	13	1.0%	0.009811321
11	10 All the time	8	0.6%	0.006037736
97	No answer	82	6.2%	0.061886792
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr35_1

Variable label:	Statement: In most ways my life is almost ideal
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life?
Literal question:	In most ways my life is almost ideal
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	83	6.3%	0.06264151
2	Agree	401	30.3%	0.30264151
3	Agree somewhat	369	27.8%	0.27849057
4	Neither agree nor disagree	199	15.0%	0.15018868
5	Disagree somewhat	118	8.9%	0.08905660
6	Disagree	94	7.1%	0.07094340
7	Strongly disagree	27	2.0%	0.02037736
97	No answer	34	2.6%	0.02566038
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr35_2

Variable label:	Statement: My circumstances are excellent
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life?
Literal question:	My circumstances are excellent
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	141	10.6%	0.10641509
2	Agree	523	39.5%	0.39471698
3	Agree somewhat	292	22.0%	0.22037736
4	Neither agree nor disagree	140	10.6%	0.10566038
5	Disagree somewhat	119	9.0%	0.08981132
6	Disagree	61	4.6%	0.04603774
7	Strongly disagree	16	1.2%	0.01207547
97	No answer	33	2.5%	0.02490566
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr35_3

Variable label:	Statement: So far I have got most of the things I have wanted in life
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life?
Literal question:	So far I have got most of the things I have wanted in life
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	159	12.0%	0.12000000
2	Agree	542	40.9%	0.40905660
3	Agree somewhat	295	22.3%	0.22264151
4	Neither agree nor disagree	126	9.5%	0.09509434
5	Disagree somewhat	107	8.1%	0.08075472
6	Disagree	48	3.6%	0.03622642
7	Strongly disagree	15	1.1%	0.01132075
97	No answer	33	2.5%	0.02490566
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr35_4

Variable label:	Statement: I am satisfied with my life
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life?
Literal question:	I am satisfied with my life
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	207	15.6%	0.156226415
2	Agree	636	48.0%	0.480000000
3	Agree somewhat	244	18.4%	0.184150943
4	Neither agree nor disagree	68	5.1%	0.051320755
5	Disagree somewhat	80	6.0%	0.060377358
6	Disagree	50	3.8%	0.037735849
7	Strongly disagree	9	0.7%	0.006792453
97	No answer	31	2.3%	0.023396226
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr35_5

Variable label:	Statement: If I could relive my life, I would not really change anything
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life?
Literal question:	If I could relive my life, I would not really change anything
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	50	3.8%	0.03773585
2	Agree	242	18.3%	0.18264151
3	Agree somewhat	321	24.2%	0.24226415
4	Neither agree nor disagree	148	11.2%	0.11169811
5	Disagree somewhat	295	22.3%	0.22264151
6	Disagree	164	12.4%	0.12377358
7	Strongly disagree	70	5.3%	0.05283019
97	No answer	35	2.6%	0.02641509
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr36_1

Variable label:	Satisfied with: Standard of living
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	Your standard of living?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	335	25.3%	0.252830189
2	Satisfied	742	56.0%	0.560000000
3	Slightly satisfied	180	13.6%	0.135849057
4	Not very satisfied	16	1.2%	0.012075472
5	Not satisfied	22	1.7%	0.016603774
6	Not at all satisfied	7	0.5%	0.005283019
7	Not relevant	0	0.0%	0.000000000
97	No answer	23	1.7%	0.017358491
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr36_2

Variable label:	Satisfied with: Health
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	Your health?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	231	17.4%	0.174339623
2	Satisfied	613	46.3%	0.462641509
3	Slightly satisfied	290	21.9%	0.218867925
4	Not very satisfied	73	5.5%	0.055094340
5	Not satisfied	58	4.4%	0.043773585
6	Not at all satisfied	37	2.8%	0.027924528
7	Not relevant	1	0.1%	0.000754717
97	No answer	22	1.7%	0.016603774
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr36_3

Variable label:	Satisfied with: What you are achieving in life
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	What you are achieving in life?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	133	10.0%	0.100377358
2	Satisfied	700	52.8%	0.528301887
3	Slightly satisfied	354	26.7%	0.267169811
4	Not very satisfied	59	4.5%	0.044528302
5	Not satisfied	34	2.6%	0.025660377
6	Not at all satisfied	16	1.2%	0.012075472
7	Not relevant	1	0.1%	0.000754717
97	No answer	28	2.1%	0.021132075
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr36_4

Variable label:	Satisfied with: Personal relationships
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	Your personal relationships?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	215	16.2%	0.162264151
2	Satisfied	668	50.4%	0.504150943
3	Slightly satisfied	329	24.8%	0.248301887
4	Not very satisfied	50	3.8%	0.037735849
5	Not satisfied	22	1.7%	0.016603774
6	Not at all satisfied	12	0.9%	0.009056604
7	Not relevant	1	0.1%	0.000754717
97	No answer	28	2.1%	0.021132075
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr36_5

Variable label:	Satisfied with: How safe you feel
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	How safe you feel?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	321	24.2%	0.242264151
2	Satisfied	723	54.6%	0.545660377
3	Slightly satisfied	189	14.3%	0.142641509
4	Not very satisfied	28	2.1%	0.021132075
5	Not satisfied	22	1.7%	0.016603774
6	Not at all satisfied	13	1.0%	0.009811321
7	Not relevant	1	0.1%	0.000754717
97	No answer	28	2.1%	0.021132075
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr36_6

Variable label:	Satisfied with: The feeling of being part of a neighborhood community
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	The feeling of being part of a neighbourhood community?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	127	9.6%	0.09584906
2	Satisfied	506	38.2%	0.38188679
3	Slightly satisfied	392	29.6%	0.29584906
4	Not very satisfied	154	11.6%	0.11622642
5	Not satisfied	70	5.3%	0.05283019
6	Not at all satisfied	23	1.7%	0.01735849
7	Not relevant	19	1.4%	0.01433962
97	No answer	34	2.6%	0.02566038
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr36_7

Variable label:	Satisfied with: Prospect of safety
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	The prospects for safety in the future?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	154	11.6%	0.11622642
2	Satisfied	671	50.6%	0.50641509
3	Slightly satisfied	320	24.2%	0.24150943
4	Not very satisfied	80	6.0%	0.06037736
5	Not satisfied	39	2.9%	0.02943396
6	Not at all satisfied	32	2.4%	0.02415094
7	Not relevant	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	29	2.2%	0.02188679
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr36_8

Variable label:	Satisfied with: The amount of time to do the things you like
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	The amount of time you have to do the things you like doing?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	123	9.3%	0.09283019
2	Satisfied	534	40.3%	0.40301887
3	Slightly satisfied	371	28.0%	0.28000000
4	Not very satisfied	153	11.5%	0.11547170
5	Not satisfied	75	5.7%	0.05660377
6	Not at all satisfied	43	3.2%	0.03245283
7	Not relevant	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	26	2.0%	0.01962264
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr36_9

Variable label:	Satisfied with: Quality of nature and the environment in the natural area
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	The quality of nature and the environment in your local nature?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	469	35.4%	0.353962264
2	Satisfied	645	48.7%	0.486792453
3	Slightly satisfied	147	11.1%	0.110943396
4	Not very satisfied	26	2.0%	0.019622642
5	Not satisfied	10	0.8%	0.007547170
6	Not at all satisfied	3	0.2%	0.002264151
7	Not relevant	1	0.1%	0.000754717
97	No answer	24	1.8%	0.018113208
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr36_10

Variable label:	Satisfied with: Your job
Pre-question text:	How satisfied are you with …
Literal question:	Your job
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very satisfied	183	13.8%	0.13811321
2	Satisfied	486	36.7%	0.36679245
3	Slightly satisfied	230	17.4%	0.17358491
4	Not very satisfied	41	3.1%	0.03094340
5	Not satisfied	27	2.0%	0.02037736
6	Not at all satisfied	18	1.4%	0.01358491
7	Not relevant	293	22.1%	0.22113208
97	No answer	47	3.5%	0.03547170
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5fr37

Variable label:	Life situation in five years
Literal question:	If you think about your life situation in five years’ time, do you think it will be …
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Worse than it is now	109	8.2%	0.08226415
2	About the same as now	857	64.7%	0.64679245
3	Better than it is now	332	25.1%	0.25056604
97	No answer	27	2.0%	0.02037736
98	Not asked	4126		NA

fri11

Variable label:	In general, how good is your health?
Literal question:	Generally speaking, how good is your health?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good	347	26.2%	0.26188679
2	Good	742	56.0%	0.56000000
3	Not very good	184	13.9%	0.13886792
4	Poor	26	2.0%	0.01962264
97	No answer	26	2.0%	0.01962264
98	Not asked	4126		NA

fri12

Variable label:	Have chronic illness or health problem expected to persist at least 6 months
Literal question:	Do you suffer from any chronic illnesses or health problems that are expected to last for at least six months or more?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes	549	41.4%	0.41433962
2	No	701	52.9%	0.52905660
3	Do not wish to reply	48	3.6%	0.03622642
97	No answer	27	2.0%	0.02037736
98	Not asked	4126		NA

fri13

Variable label:	Prevented from performing activity due to health problems
Literal question:	During the last six months have you been prevented from undertaking any activities that people usually do due to health problems?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes, very much prevented	73	5.5%	0.05509434
2	Yes, prevented	316	23.8%	0.23849057
3	No, not prevented	901	68.0%	0.68000000
97	No answer	35	2.6%	0.02641509
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5friend

Variable label:	Number of friends
Literal question:	About how many friends do you have at the moment? These are people you can relax with, talk to about private topics or ask for help.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	None	19	1.4%	0.01433962
2	1-2	158	11.9%	0.11924528
3	3-5	450	34.0%	0.33962264
4	6-10	430	32.5%	0.32452830
5	More than 10	244	18.4%	0.18415094
97	No answer	24	1.8%	0.01811321
98	Not asked	4126		NA

r5frnet_1

Variable label:	People that you know who: Could help you find a job
Pre-question text:	Among the people you know personally, are there any who …
Literal question:	Could help you to find a job, if necessary?
Technical description:	More than one answer possible [Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Could help you to find a job, if necessary?	609	46.0%	0.45962264
97	No answer	18	1.4%	0.01358491
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		698	52.7%	0.52679245

r5frnet_2

Variable label:	People that you know who: Could lend you a large sum of money
Pre-question text:	Among the people you know personally, are there any who …
Literal question:	Could lend you a large amount of money (e.g. 20,000 kroner)?
Technical description:	More than one answer possible [Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Could lend you a large amount of money (e.g. 20,000 kroner)?	703	53.1%	0.53056604
97	No answer	18	1.4%	0.01358491
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		604	45.6%	0.45584906

r5frnet_3

Variable label:	People that you know who: Is in a high position in business, public administration or politics
Pre-question text:	Among the people you know personally, are there any who …
Literal question:	Have a high position in business, public administration or politics?
Technical description:	More than one answer possible [Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Have a high position in business, public administration or politics?	442	33.4%	0.33358491
97	No answer	18	1.4%	0.01358491
98	Not asked	4126		NA
0		865	65.3%	0.65283019

r5frnet_4

Variable label:	People that you know who: No such people
Pre-question text:	Among the people you know personally, are there any who …
Literal question:	There are no such people among the people I know personally
Technical description:	More than one answer possible [Asked if u=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1307] [Invalid:4144] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	There are no such people among the people I know personally	335	25.6%	0.2563122
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
0		972	74.4%	0.7436878
Sysmiss		4144		NA

mobil_bw

Variable label:	mobile_bw
Technical description:	[Selecting non-mobile users for Bandwagon experiment (PAD2 and PAD6)]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5420] [Invalid:31] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	Not mobile phone	4239	78.2%	0.7821033
1	Mobile phone	1181	21.8%	0.2178967
Sysmiss		31		NA

qcount_1

Variable label:	1 ()
Technical description:	[Stores aggregated distribution for each group defined in BW_groupsPAD2. ]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

bw_groupspad2

Variable label:	BWgroupsPAD2
Technical description:	[Ifu=2 or u=3 or mobil_bw=0, allocates respondents in groups. First 10 respondents gets the value 0. Subsequent respondents are chronologically defined in groups of 425.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2094] [Invalid:3357] [Range:0-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	Group 0	11	0.5%	0.005253104
1	Group 1	423	20.2%	0.202005731
2	Group 2	426	20.3%	0.203438395
3	Group 3	423	20.2%	0.202005731
4	Group 4	422	20.2%	0.201528176
5	Group 5	389	18.6%	0.185768863
6	Group 6	0	0.0%	0.000000000
7	Group 7	0	0.0%	0.000000000
8	1 ()	0	0.0%	0.000000000
Sysmiss		3357		NA

r5pad2start

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	1	0.1%	0.0009017133
2	Agree	1	0.1%	0.0009017133
3	Agree somewhat	2	0.2%	0.0018034265
4	Neither agree nor disagree	1	0.1%	0.0009017133
5	Disagree somewhat	1	0.1%	0.0009017133
6	Disagree	4	0.4%	0.0036068530
7	Strongly disagree	1	0.1%	0.0009017133
97	No answer	1098	99.0%	0.9900811542
98	Not asked	4342		NA

r5pad2start_recode

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Technical description:	[Recodes R5PAD2start. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if BW_groupsPAD2=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	6	0.5%	0.005410280
2	Agree	4	0.4%	0.003606853
97	No answer	1099	99.1%	0.990982867
98	Not asked	4342		NA

bw_ran1

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=1]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:423] [Invalid:5028] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	224	53.0%	0.5295508
2	2	199	47.0%	0.4704492
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		5028		NA

r5pad2a1

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=1 and BW_ran1=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	21	2.4%	0.02408257
2	Agree	45	5.2%	0.05160550
3	Agree somewhat	42	4.8%	0.04816514
4	Neither agree nor disagree	17	1.9%	0.01949541
5	Disagree somewhat	24	2.8%	0.02752294
6	Disagree	42	4.8%	0.04816514
7	Strongly disagree	32	3.7%	0.03669725
97	No answer	649	74.4%	0.74426606
98	Not asked	4579		NA

r5pad2a2

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Spurt hvis u=2 eller u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=1 og BW_ran1=2. Respondentene er ikke eksponert for visuell stimuli.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	30	3.5%	0.03541913
2	Agree	47	5.5%	0.05548996
3	Agree somewhat	32	3.8%	0.03778040
4	Neither agree nor disagree	13	1.5%	0.01534829
5	Disagree somewhat	19	2.2%	0.02243211
6	Disagree	27	3.2%	0.03187721
7	Strongly disagree	30	3.5%	0.03541913
97	No answer	649	76.6%	0.76623377
98	Not asked	4604		NA

r5pad2a1_recode

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Technical description:	[Recodes R5PAD2A1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=1 and BW_ran1=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	98	11.2%	0.1123853
2	Agree	108	12.4%	0.1238532
97	No answer	666	76.4%	0.7637615
98	Not asked	4579		NA

bw_ran2

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=2]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:426] [Invalid:5025] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	229	53.8%	0.5375587
2	2	197	46.2%	0.4624413
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		5025		NA

r5pad2b1

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=2 and BW_ran2=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	33	3.8%	0.03762828
2	Agree	61	7.0%	0.06955530
3	Agree somewhat	36	4.1%	0.04104903
4	Neither agree nor disagree	16	1.8%	0.01824401
5	Disagree somewhat	21	2.4%	0.02394527
6	Disagree	29	3.3%	0.03306727
7	Strongly disagree	32	3.6%	0.03648803
97	No answer	649	74.0%	0.74002281
98	Not asked	4574		NA

r5pad2b2

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=2 and BW_ran2=2. Respondents are not exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	33	3.9%	0.03905325
2	Agree	47	5.6%	0.05562130
3	Agree somewhat	37	4.4%	0.04378698
4	Neither agree nor disagree	16	1.9%	0.01893491
5	Disagree somewhat	19	2.2%	0.02248521
6	Disagree	23	2.7%	0.02721893
7	Strongly disagree	19	2.2%	0.02248521
97	No answer	651	77.0%	0.77041420
98	Not asked	4606		NA

r5pad2b1_recode

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Technical description:	[Recodes R5PAD2B1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=2 and BW_ran2=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	82	9.4%	0.09350057
2	Agree	130	14.8%	0.14823261
97	No answer	665	75.8%	0.75826682
98	Not asked	4574		NA

bw_ran3

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=3]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:423] [Invalid:5028] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	214	50.6%	0.5059102
2	2	209	49.4%	0.4940898
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		5028		NA

r5pad2c1

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=3 and BW_ran3=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	26	4.0%	0.03975535
2	Agree	60	9.2%	0.09174312
3	Agree somewhat	32	4.9%	0.04892966
4	Neither agree nor disagree	11	1.7%	0.01681957
5	Disagree somewhat	31	4.7%	0.04740061
6	Disagree	26	4.0%	0.03975535
7	Strongly disagree	28	4.3%	0.04281346
97	No answer	440	67.3%	0.67278287
98	Not asked	4797		NA

r5pad2c2

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=3 and BW_ran3=2. Respondents are not exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	28	4.3%	0.04314330
2	Agree	49	7.6%	0.07550077
3	Agree somewhat	48	7.4%	0.07395994
4	Neither agree nor disagree	21	3.2%	0.03235747
5	Disagree somewhat	15	2.3%	0.02311248
6	Disagree	21	3.2%	0.03235747
7	Strongly disagree	26	4.0%	0.04006163
97	No answer	441	68.0%	0.67950693
98	Not asked	4802		NA

r5pad2c1_recode

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	[Rekoder R5PAD2C1. Lagrer gruppeverdi [uenig, enig] i qcount_1. Rekoder hvis u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=3 og BW_ran3=1]
Technical description:	[Recodes R5PAD2C1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=3 and BW_ran3=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	85	13.0%	0.1299694
2	Agree	118	18.0%	0.1804281
97	No answer	451	69.0%	0.6896024
98	Not asked	4797		NA

bw_ran4

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:422] [Invalid:5029] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	229	54.3%	0.542654
2	2	193	45.7%	0.457346
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		5029		NA

r5pad2d1

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=4 and BW_ran4=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	25	3.8%	0.03816794
2	Agree	55	8.4%	0.08396947
3	Agree somewhat	40	6.1%	0.06106870
4	Neither agree nor disagree	18	2.7%	0.02748092
5	Disagree somewhat	27	4.1%	0.04122137
6	Disagree	26	4.0%	0.03969466
7	Strongly disagree	38	5.8%	0.05801527
97	No answer	426	65.0%	0.65038168
98	Not asked	4796		NA

r5pad2d2

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=4 and BW_ran4=2. Respondents are not exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	28	4.5%	0.04523425
2	Agree	41	6.6%	0.06623586
3	Agree somewhat	37	6.0%	0.05977383
4	Neither agree nor disagree	26	4.2%	0.04200323
5	Disagree somewhat	20	3.2%	0.03231018
6	Disagree	12	1.9%	0.01938611
7	Strongly disagree	28	4.5%	0.04523425
97	No answer	427	69.0%	0.68982229
98	Not asked	4832		NA

r5pad2d1_recode

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Technical description:	[Recodes R5PAD2D1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=4 and BW_ran4=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	91	13.9%	0.1389313
2	Agree	120	18.3%	0.1832061
97	No answer	444	67.8%	0.6778626
98	Not asked	4796		NA

bw_ran5

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=5]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:389] [Invalid:5062] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	197	50.6%	0.5064267
2	2	192	49.4%	0.4935733
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		5062		NA

r5pad2e1

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=5 and BW_ran5=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	21	3.3%	0.03349282
2	Agree	44	7.0%	0.07017544
3	Agree somewhat	42	6.7%	0.06698565
4	Neither agree nor disagree	14	2.2%	0.02232855
5	Disagree somewhat	24	3.8%	0.03827751
6	Disagree	27	4.3%	0.04306220
7	Strongly disagree	25	4.0%	0.03987241
97	No answer	430	68.6%	0.68580542
98	Not asked	4824		NA

r5pad2e2

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=5 and BW_ran5=2. Respondents are not exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	22	3.5%	0.03536977
2	Agree	47	7.6%	0.07556270
3	Agree somewhat	41	6.6%	0.06591640
4	Neither agree nor disagree	15	2.4%	0.02411576
5	Disagree somewhat	21	3.4%	0.03376206
6	Disagree	24	3.9%	0.03858521
7	Strongly disagree	21	3.4%	0.03376206
97	No answer	431	69.3%	0.69292605
98	Not asked	4829		NA

r5pad2e1_recode

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Technical description:	[Recodes R5PAD2E1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=5 and BW_ran5=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Disagree	76	12.1%	0.1212121
2	Agree	107	17.1%	0.1706539
97	No answer	444	70.8%	0.7081340
98	Not asked	4824		NA

bw_ran6

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=6]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:5451] [Range:-]

r5pad2f1

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=6 and BW_ran6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:98-*]

Value	Label	Cases
1	Strongly agree	0	NaN
2	Agree	0	NaN
3	Agree somewhat	0	NaN
4	Neither agree nor disagree	0	NaN
5	Disagree somewhat	0	NaN
6	Disagree	0	NaN
7	Strongly disagree	0	NaN
97	No answer	0	NaN
98	Not asked	5451	NA

r5pad2f2

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=6 and BW_ran6=2. Respondents are not exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:98-*]

Value	Label	Cases
1	Strongly agree	0	NaN
2	Agree	0	NaN
3	Agree somewhat	0	NaN
4	Neither agree nor disagree	0	NaN
5	Disagree somewhat	0	NaN
6	Disagree	0	NaN
7	Strongly disagree	0	NaN
97	No answer	0	NaN
98	Not asked	5451	NA

r5pad2f1_recode

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Technical description:	[Recodes R5PAD2F1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=6 and BW_ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:98-*]

Value	Label	Cases
1	Disagree	0	NaN
2	Agree	0	NaN
97	No answer	0	NaN
98	Not asked	5451	NA

bw_ran7

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=7]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2 or u=3 andBW_groupsPAD2=7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:5451] [Range:-]

r5pad2g1

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=7 and BW_ran7=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:98-*]

Value	Label	Cases
1	Strongly agree	0	NaN
2	Agree	0	NaN
3	Agree somewhat	0	NaN
4	Neither agree nor disagree	0	NaN
5	Disagree somewhat	0	NaN
6	Disagree	0	NaN
7	Strongly disagree	0	NaN
97	No answer	0	NaN
98	Not asked	5451	NA

r5pad2g2

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=7 and BW_ran7=2. Respondents are not exposed to vizual stimulation.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:98-*]

Value	Label	Cases
1	Strongly agree	0	NaN
2	Agree	0	NaN
3	Agree somewhat	0	NaN
4	Neither agree nor disagree	0	NaN
5	Disagree somewhat	0	NaN
6	Disagree	0	NaN
7	Strongly disagree	0	NaN
97	No answer	0	NaN
98	Not asked	5451	NA

r5pad2g1_recode

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Technical description:	[Recodes R5PAD2G1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if u=2 or u=3, BW_groupsPAD2=7 and BW_ran7=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:98-*]

Value	Label	Cases
1	Disagree	0	NaN
2	Agree	0	NaN
97	No answer	0	NaN
98	Not asked	5451	NA

r5pad3

Variable label:	The extent to which one has a strong opinion on the refugee issue
Literal question:	To what extent would you say that you have a strong opinion on this question?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3. Part of the Bandwagon experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	To a very great extent	151	11.8%	0.118245889
2	To a great extent	366	28.7%	0.286609240
3	To some extent	407	31.9%	0.318715740
4	Hardly at all	57	4.5%	0.044635865
5	Not at all	6	0.5%	0.004698512
97	No answer	290	22.7%	0.227094753
98	Not asked	4174		NA

r5pad4

Variable label:	Knowledge about the number of refugees Norway has decided to accept
Literal question:	How much knowledge do you think you have about how many refugees Norway has agreed to accept in the next three years?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3. Part of the Bandwagon experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very good knowledge	65	5.1%	0.050900548
2	Good knowledge	372	29.1%	0.291307753
3	Some knowledge	453	35.5%	0.354737666
4	Not much knowledge	81	6.3%	0.063429914
5	No knowledge at all	10	0.8%	0.007830854
97	No answer	296	23.2%	0.231793265
98	Not asked	4174		NA

r5pad5

Variable label:	Guess the number of residents who agreed to accept more Syrian refugees than has been agreed
Literal question:	If you were to guess, how many of Norway’s citizens do you think would agree that the country should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3. Part of the Bandwagon experiment.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Almost everyone	3	0.2%	0.002349256
2	About 2 out of 3	180	14.1%	0.140955364
3	About half	387	30.3%	0.303054033
4	About 1 out of 3	338	26.5%	0.264682850
5	Almost no-one	62	4.9%	0.048551292
97	No answer	307	24.0%	0.240407204
98	Not asked	4174		NA

r5pad3aa

Variable label:	Reason for the answer about Syrian refugees [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Can you write the reason for your answer about Syrian refugees?
Technical description:	We want all types of answers. A couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you. [Asked if u=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment.] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5ran24

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1427] [Invalid:4024] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	294	20.6%	0.2060266
2	2	282	19.8%	0.1976174
3	3	287	20.1%	0.2011212
4	4	297	20.8%	0.2081289
5	5	267	18.7%	0.1871058
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	0		NA
Sysmiss		4024		NA

r5pad6a

Variable label:	PST has requested wiretapping: Muslim fundamentalist group
Pre-question text:	Imagine that the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) has asked for permission to listen to the telephone calls of members or sympathisers of a Muslim fundamentalist group because they believe this will help them in investigating a terrorist case. Some people believe PST should be allowed to do so because they can prevent a terrorist plot at an early stage, others believe they should not be allowed because this would be too much of an intrusion into the private lives of the group.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian Police Security Service should be allowed to listen to telephone calls in this way?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 and ran24=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	121	41.2%	0.411564626
2	Agree	93	31.6%	0.316326531
3	Agree somewhat	52	17.7%	0.176870748
4	Neither agree nor disagree	7	2.4%	0.023809524
5	Disagree somewhat	8	2.7%	0.027210884
6	Disagree	8	2.7%	0.027210884
7	Strongly disagree	3	1.0%	0.010204082
97	No answer	2	0.7%	0.006802721
98	Not asked	5157		NA

r5pad6b

Variable label:	PST has requested wiretapping: Muslim community
Pre-question text:	Imagine that the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) has asked for permission to listen to the telephone calls of members or sympathisers of a Muslim congregation because they believe this will help them in investigating a terrorist case. Some people believe PST should be allowed to do so because they can prevent a terrorist plot at an early stage, others believe they should not be allowed because this would be too much of an intrusion into the private lives of the group.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian Police Security Service should be allowed to listen to telephone calls in this way?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 and ran24=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	85	30.1%	0.301418440
2	Agree	72	25.5%	0.255319149
3	Agree somewhat	67	23.8%	0.237588652
4	Neither agree nor disagree	20	7.1%	0.070921986
5	Disagree somewhat	13	4.6%	0.046099291
6	Disagree	16	5.7%	0.056737589
7	Strongly disagree	8	2.8%	0.028368794
97	No answer	1	0.4%	0.003546099
98	Not asked	5169		NA

r5pad6c

Variable label:	PST has requested wiretapping: Right-wing group
Pre-question text:	Imagine that the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) has asked for permission to listen to the telephone calls of members or sympathisers of an extreme right wing group because they believe this will help them in investigating a terrorist case. Some people believe PST should be allowed to do so because they can prevent a terrorist plot at an early stage, others believe they should not be allowed because this would be too much of an intrusion into the private lives of the group.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian Police Security Service should be allowed to listen to telephone calls in this way?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 and ran24=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	93	32.4%	0.324041812
2	Agree	104	36.2%	0.362369338
3	Agree somewhat	56	19.5%	0.195121951
4	Neither agree nor disagree	11	3.8%	0.038327526
5	Disagree somewhat	12	4.2%	0.041811847
6	Disagree	6	2.1%	0.020905923
7	Strongly disagree	4	1.4%	0.013937282
97	No answer	1	0.3%	0.003484321
98	Not asked	5164		NA

r5pad6d

Variable label:	PST has requested wiretapping: The Progress Party
Pre-question text:	Imagine that the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) has asked for permission to listen to the telephone calls of members or sympathisers of the Progress Party (Fremskrittspartiet) because they believe this will help them in investigating a terrorist case. Some people believe PST should be allowed to do so because they can prevent a terrorist plot at an early stage, others believe they should not be allowed because this would be too much of an intrusion into the private lives of the group.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian Police Security Service should be allowed to listen to telephone calls in this way?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 and ran24=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	36	12.1%	0.12121212
2	Agree	56	18.9%	0.18855219
3	Agree somewhat	77	25.9%	0.25925926
4	Neither agree nor disagree	29	9.8%	0.09764310
5	Disagree somewhat	30	10.1%	0.10101010
6	Disagree	34	11.4%	0.11447811
7	Strongly disagree	31	10.4%	0.10437710
97	No answer	4	1.3%	0.01346801
98	Not asked	5154		NA

r5pad6e

Variable label:	PST has requested wiretapping: Social group
Pre-question text:	Imagine that the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) has asked for permission to listen to the telephone calls of a social group because they believe this will help them in investigating a terrorist case. Some people believe PST should be allowed to do so because they can prevent a terrorist plot at an early stage, others believe they should not be allowed because this would be too much of an intrusion into the private lives of the group.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian Police Security Service should be allowed to listen to telephone calls in this way?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 and ran24=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	72	27.0%	0.269662921
2	Agree	62	23.2%	0.232209738
3	Agree somewhat	71	26.6%	0.265917603
4	Neither agree nor disagree	13	4.9%	0.048689139
5	Disagree somewhat	20	7.5%	0.074906367
6	Disagree	13	4.9%	0.048689139
7	Strongly disagree	14	5.2%	0.052434457
97	No answer	2	0.7%	0.007490637
98	Not asked	5184		NA

r5ran2

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=3]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1270] [Invalid:4181] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	337	26.5%	0.2653543
2	2	295	23.2%	0.2322835
3	3	295	23.2%	0.2322835
4	4	343	27.0%	0.2700787
Sysmiss		4181		NA

r5oc3a

Variable label:	Suggestion: Accept another 50 Syrian refugees or send to the neighboring municipality, determined by referendum
Pre-question text:	Consider a proposal to accept an additional 50 Syrian refugees into your municipality and provide basic integration services, such as medical care and shelter. These refugees are included in the 8,000 quota and would otherwise be assigned to a neighboring municipality.
Literal question:	Tenk deg at du skal gi din personlige stemme i en offentlig folkeavstemning om dette forslaget. Ville du umiddelbart stemt for eller imot dette forslaget?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran2=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	For	242	71.8%	0.718100890
2	Against	92	27.3%	0.272997033
97	No answer	3	0.9%	0.008902077
98	Not asked	5114		NA

r5oc3b

Variable label:	Suggestion: Accept another 50 Syrian refugees or send to the neighboring municipality, determined by municipal council
Pre-question text:	Consider a proposal to accept an additional 50 Syrian refugees into your municipality and provide basic integration services, such as medical care and shelter. These refugees are included in the 8,000 quota and would otherwise be assigned to a neighboring municipality.
Literal question:	Tenk deg at kommunestyret stemmer over dette forslaget. Ville du at kommunestyret skulle stemme for eller imot forslaget på dine vegne?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran2=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	For	205	69.5%	0.69491525
2	Against	86	29.2%	0.29152542
97	No answer	4	1.4%	0.01355932
98	Not asked	5156		NA

r5oc3c

Variable label:	Suggestion: Accept another 50 Syrian refugees or send out of the country, determined by referendum
Pre-question text:	Consider a proposal to accept an additional 50 Syrian refugees into your municipality and provide basic integration services, such as medical care and shelter. These refugees are not included in the 8,000 quota and would otherwise not be allowed to enter the country.
Literal question:	Imagine that you are personally voting in a public referendum on this proposal. Would you like to directly vote for or against this proposal?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran2=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	For	184	62.4%	0.62372881
2	Against	103	34.9%	0.34915254
97	No answer	8	2.7%	0.02711864
98	Not asked	5156		NA

r5oc3d

Variable label:	Suggestion: Accept another 50 Syrian refugees or send out of the country, determined by municipal council
Pre-question text:	Consider a proposal to accept an additional 50 Syrian refugees into your municipality and provide basic integration services, such as medical care and shelter. These refugees are not included in the 8,000 quota and would otherwise not be allowed to enter the country.
Literal question:	Imagine that your municipal council is voting on this proposal. Would you like your municipal council to vote for or against the proposal on your behalf?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran2=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	For	216	63.0%	0.62973761
2	Against	119	34.7%	0.34693878
97	No answer	8	2.3%	0.02332362
98	Not asked	5108		NA

r5ran25

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2 OR u=3]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2 OR u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2692] [Invalid:2759] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	667	24.8%	0.2477712
2	2	691	25.7%	0.2566865
3	3	652	24.2%	0.2421991
4	4	682	25.3%	0.2533432
Sysmiss		2759		NA

r5km2a_1

Variable label:	Statement, only own municipality: The wind turbines will have negative effects locally
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will only occur in the municipality that you live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	The wind turbines will have negative effects locally
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	77	4.5%	0.04532078
2	Slightly disagree	186	10.9%	0.10947616
3	Slightly agree	232	13.7%	0.13655091
4	Strongly agree	62	3.6%	0.03649205
97	No answer	1142	67.2%	0.67216009
98	Not asked	3752		NA

r5km2a_2

Variable label:	Statement, only own municipality: The wind turbines will make the energy supply more sustainable
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will only occur in the municipality that you live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	The wind turbines will make the energy supply more sustainable
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	29	1.7%	0.01706886
2	Slightly disagree	69	4.1%	0.04061212
3	Slightly agree	294	17.3%	0.17304297
4	Strongly agree	164	9.7%	0.09652737
97	No answer	1143	67.3%	0.67274868
98	Not asked	3752		NA

r5km2a_3

Variable label:	Statement, only own municipality: The proposal is reasonable
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will only occur in the municipality that you live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	The proposal is reasonable
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	59	3.5%	0.03472631
2	Slightly disagree	98	5.8%	0.05768099
3	Slightly agree	294	17.3%	0.17304297
4	Strongly agree	106	6.2%	0.06238964
97	No answer	1142	67.2%	0.67216009
98	Not asked	3752		NA

r5km2a_4

Variable label:	Statement, only own municipality: It is my duty as a citizen to help ensure Norway’s energy supply
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will only occur in the municipality that you live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	It is my duty as a citizen to help ensure Norway’s energy supply
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	36	2.1%	0.02118893
2	Slightly disagree	86	5.1%	0.05061801
3	Slightly agree	326	19.2%	0.19187758
4	Strongly agree	106	6.2%	0.06238964
97	No answer	1145	67.4%	0.67392584
98	Not asked	3752		NA

r5km2b_1

Variable label:	Statement, own and other municipality: The wind turbines will have negative effects locally
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will occur in your municipality and another municipality in the county. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	The wind turbines will have negative effects locally
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	62	3.6%	0.03647059
2	Slightly disagree	190	11.2%	0.11176471
3	Slightly agree	233	13.7%	0.13705882
4	Strongly agree	70	4.1%	0.04117647
97	No answer	1145	67.4%	0.67352941
98	Not asked	3751		NA

r5km2b_2

Variable label:	Statement, own and other municipality: The wind turbines will make the energy supply more sustainable
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will occur in your municipality and another municipality in the county. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	The wind turbines will make the energy supply more sustainable
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	38	2.2%	0.02235294
2	Slightly disagree	78	4.6%	0.04588235
3	Slightly agree	290	17.1%	0.17058824
4	Strongly agree	147	8.6%	0.08647059
97	No answer	1147	67.5%	0.67470588
98	Not asked	3751		NA

r5km2b_3

Variable label:	Statement, own and other municipality: The proposal is reasonable
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will occur in your municipality and another municipality in the county. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	The proposal is reasonable
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	50	2.9%	0.02941176
2	Slightly disagree	106	6.2%	0.06235294
3	Slightly agree	308	18.1%	0.18117647
4	Strongly agree	89	5.2%	0.05235294
97	No answer	1147	67.5%	0.67470588
98	Not asked	3751		NA

r5km2b_4

Variable label:	Statement, own and other municipality: It is my duty as a citizen to help ensure Norway’s energy supply
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will occur in your municipality and another municipality in the county. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	It is my duty as a citizen to help ensure Norway’s energy supply
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	35	2.1%	0.02058824
2	Slightly disagree	77	4.5%	0.04529412
3	Slightly agree	331	19.5%	0.19470588
4	Strongly agree	112	6.6%	0.06588235
97	No answer	1145	67.4%	0.67352941
98	Not asked	3751		NA

r5km2c_1

Variable label:	Statement, only own municipality, compensation: The wind turbines will have negative effects locally
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will only occur in the municipality that you live in. The government will also offer money to residents to compensate for the negative effects of the new wind turbines. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	The wind turbines will have negative effects locally
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	65	3.8%	0.03801170
2	Slightly disagree	159	9.3%	0.09298246
3	Slightly agree	224	13.1%	0.13099415
4	Strongly agree	80	4.7%	0.04678363
97	No answer	1182	69.1%	0.69122807
98	Not asked	3741		NA

r5km2c_2

Variable label:	Statement, only own municipality, compensation: The wind turbines will make the energy supply more sustainable
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will only occur in the municipality that you live in. The government will also offer money to residents to compensate for the negative effects of the new wind turbines. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	The wind turbines will make the energy supply more sustainable
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	51	3.0%	0.02982456
2	Slightly disagree	72	4.2%	0.04210526
3	Slightly agree	282	16.5%	0.16491228
4	Strongly agree	125	7.3%	0.07309942
97	No answer	1180	69.0%	0.69005848
98	Not asked	3741		NA

r5km2c_3

Variable label:	Statement, only own municipality, compensation: The proposal is reasonable
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will only occur in the municipality that you live in. The government will also offer money to residents to compensate for the negative effects of the new wind turbines. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	The proposal is reasonable
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	67	3.9%	0.03918129
2	Slightly disagree	112	6.5%	0.06549708
3	Slightly agree	260	15.2%	0.15204678
4	Strongly agree	86	5.0%	0.05029240
97	No answer	1185	69.3%	0.69298246
98	Not asked	3741		NA

r5km2c_4

Variable label:	Statement, only own municipality, compensation: It is my duty as a citizen to help ensure Norway’s energy supply
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will only occur in the municipality that you live in. The government will also offer money to residents to compensate for the negative effects of the new wind turbines. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	It is my duty as a citizen to help ensure Norway’s energy supply
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	30	1.8%	0.01754386
2	Slightly disagree	100	5.8%	0.05847953
3	Slightly agree	278	16.3%	0.16257310
4	Strongly agree	115	6.7%	0.06725146
97	No answer	1187	69.4%	0.69415205
98	Not asked	3741		NA

r5km2d_1

Variable label:	Statement, own and other municipality, compensation: The wind turbines will have negative effects locally
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will only occur in the municipality that you live in. The government will also offer money to residents to compensate for the negative effects of the new wind turbines. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	The wind turbines will have negative effects locally
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	68	4.0%	0.03995300
2	Slightly disagree	209	12.3%	0.12279671
3	Slightly agree	208	12.2%	0.12220917
4	Strongly agree	69	4.1%	0.04054054
97	No answer	1148	67.5%	0.67450059
98	Not asked	3749		NA

r5km2d_2

Variable label:	Statement, own and other municipality, compensation: The wind turbines will make the energy supply more sustainable
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will only occur in the municipality that you live in. The government will also offer money to residents to compensate for the negative effects of the new wind turbines. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	The wind turbines will make the energy supply more sustainable
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	33	1.9%	0.01938895
2	Slightly disagree	74	4.3%	0.04347826
3	Slightly agree	286	16.8%	0.16803760
4	Strongly agree	158	9.3%	0.09283196
97	No answer	1151	67.6%	0.67626322
98	Not asked	3749		NA

r5km2d_3

Variable label:	Statement, own and other municipality, compensation: The proposal is reasonable
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will only occur in the municipality that you live in. The government will also offer money to residents to compensate for the negative effects of the new wind turbines. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	The proposal is reasonable
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	48	2.8%	0.02820212
2	Slightly disagree	104	6.1%	0.06110458
3	Slightly agree	298	17.5%	0.17508813
4	Strongly agree	109	6.4%	0.06404230
97	No answer	1143	67.2%	0.67156287
98	Not asked	3749		NA

r5km2d_4

Variable label:	Statement, own and other municipality, compensation: It is my duty as a citizen to help ensure Norway’s energy supply
Pre-question text:	The government is considering giving permission for more new wind turbines, so as to increase production of renewable energy in Norway. However such wind turbines can be controversial, because they can be intrusive in the natural surroundings and cause irritating noise for people who live close by. Let us say that the county council proposes to build new wind turbines in the county in which you live and that this will only occur in the municipality that you live in. The government will also offer money to residents to compensate for the negative effects of the new wind turbines. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements below?
Literal question:	It is my duty as a citizen to help ensure Norway’s energy supply
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo and ran25=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly disagree	24	1.4%	0.01410106
2	Slightly disagree	104	6.1%	0.06110458
3	Slightly agree	320	18.8%	0.18801410
4	Strongly agree	104	6.1%	0.06110458
97	No answer	1150	67.6%	0.67567568
98	Not asked	3749		NA

r5km3

Variable label:	Vote if there were a referendum on windmills
Literal question:	Let us say that the proposal that you just read about will be subject to a referendum. Which way would you vote?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3 and the respondent does not live in Oslo]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	For	1596	63.3%	0.6328311
2	Against	619	24.5%	0.2454401
97	No answer	307	12.2%	0.1217288
98	Not asked	2929		NA

r5km4_1

Variable label:	Cause of global warming: Deforestation
Pre-question text:	As you see it, which of the following factors are causes of global warming?
Literal question:	Deforestation
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Causes global warming	1121	78.3%	0.78336827
2	Does not cause global warming	111	7.8%	0.07756813
3	Don't know	148	10.3%	0.10342418
97	No answer	51	3.6%	0.03563941
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km4_2

Variable label:	Cause of global warming: CO2 from industry
Pre-question text:	As you see it, which of the following factors are causes of global warming?
Literal question:	Emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) from industry
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Causes global warming	1230	86.0%	0.85953878
2	Does not cause global warming	48	3.4%	0.03354298
3	Don't know	110	7.7%	0.07686932
97	No answer	43	3.0%	0.03004892
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km4_3

Variable label:	Cause of global warming: Driving
Pre-question text:	As you see it, which of the following factors are causes of global warming?
Literal question:	Car driving
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Causes global warming	1187	82.9%	0.82948987
2	Does not cause global warming	99	6.9%	0.06918239
3	Don't know	100	7.0%	0.06988120
97	No answer	45	3.1%	0.03144654
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km4_4

Variable label:	Cause of global warming: Oil furnaces for heating
Pre-question text:	As you see it, which of the following factors are causes of global warming?
Literal question:	Oil-fired heating for buildings
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Causes global warming	1036	72.4%	0.72396925
2	Does not cause global warming	153	10.7%	0.10691824
3	Don't know	190	13.3%	0.13277428
97	No answer	52	3.6%	0.03633823
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km4_5

Variable label:	Cause of global warming: Gas-fired power stations
Pre-question text:	As you see it, which of the following factors are causes of global warming?
Literal question:	Gas-fired power stations
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Causes global warming	914	63.9%	0.63871419
2	Does not cause global warming	163	11.4%	0.11390636
3	Don't know	294	20.5%	0.20545073
97	No answer	60	4.2%	0.04192872
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km4_6

Variable label:	Cause of global warming: Chemical insecticides
Pre-question text:	As you see it, which of the following factors are causes of global warming?
Literal question:	Chemical insecticides
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Causes global warming	495	34.6%	0.34591195
2	Does not cause global warming	357	24.9%	0.24947589
3	Don't know	520	36.3%	0.36338225
97	No answer	59	4.1%	0.04122991
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km4_7

Variable label:	Cause of global warming: Nuclear power stations
Pre-question text:	As you see it, which of the following factors are causes of global warming?
Literal question:	Nuclear power stations
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Causes global warming	477	33.3%	0.33333333
2	Does not cause global warming	582	40.7%	0.40670860
3	Don't know	318	22.2%	0.22222222
97	No answer	54	3.8%	0.03773585
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km4_8

Variable label:	Cause of global warming: Thinner ozone layer in the upper atmosphere
Pre-question text:	As you see it, which of the following factors are causes of global warming?
Literal question:	A thinner ozone layer in the upper atmosphere
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Causes global warming	749	52.3%	0.52341020
2	Does not cause global warming	219	15.3%	0.15303983
3	Don't know	401	28.0%	0.28022362
97	No answer	62	4.3%	0.04332635
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km4_9

Variable label:	Cause of global warming: Use of spray cans
Pre-question text:	As you see it, which of the following factors are causes of global warming?
Literal question:	The use of spray cans
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Causes global warming	672	47.0%	0.46960168
2	Does not cause global warming	325	22.7%	0.22711391
3	Don't know	378	26.4%	0.26415094
97	No answer	56	3.9%	0.03913347
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km4_10

Variable label:	Cause of global warming: Extraction of oil and gas
Pre-question text:	As you see it, which of the following factors are causes of global warming?
Literal question:	Extraction of oil and gas
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Causes global warming	993	69.4%	0.69392034
2	Does not cause global warming	180	12.6%	0.12578616
3	Don't know	198	13.8%	0.13836478
97	No answer	60	4.2%	0.04192872
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km4_11

Variable label:	Cause of global warming: Production of hydropower in Norway
Pre-question text:	As you see it, which of the following factors are causes of global warming?
Literal question:	Production of hydro-electric power in Norway
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Causes global warming	26	1.8%	0.01816911
2	Does not cause global warming	1172	81.9%	0.81900769
3	Don't know	170	11.9%	0.11879804
97	No answer	63	4.4%	0.04402516
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km4_12

Variable label:	Cause of global warming: Particle emissions when coal, oil or gas is burned
Pre-question text:	As you see it, which of the following factors are causes of global warming?
Literal question:	Particle emissions when coal, oil or gas is burned
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Causes global warming	1132	79.1%	0.79105521
2	Does not cause global warming	112	7.8%	0.07826695
3	Don't know	136	9.5%	0.09503843
97	No answer	51	3.6%	0.03563941
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5ran26

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical description:	[Randomiserer hvis u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1413] [Invalid:4038] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	702	49.7%	0.4968153
2	2	711	50.3%	0.5031847
Sysmiss		4038		NA

r5km7a

Variable label:	Do you think your own home will be exposed to future damage due to sea-level rise / high rainfall
Literal question:	Do you think your own home will be exposed to future damage because of rising sea level or heavy precipitation (floods, landslides etc.)?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 and ran26=1. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5KM7B]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very exposed	2	0.3%	0.002849003
2	Quite exposed	17	2.4%	0.024216524
3	Somewhat exposed	65	9.3%	0.092592593
4	Not very exposed	216	30.8%	0.307692308
5	Not exposed	380	54.1%	0.541310541
6	Don't know	16	2.3%	0.022792023
97	No answer	6	0.9%	0.008547009
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r5km7b

Variable label:	Would you emphasized the danger of damage by sea-level rise / high rainfall in the design of your own home today?
Literal question:	If you were choosing or designing your own home today, would you attach importance to the risk of damage because of rising sea level or heavy precipitation (floods, landslides etc.)?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 and ran26=1. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5KM7A]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	I would not attach importance to this	50	7.1%	0.071225071
2	I would attach a little importance to this	68	9.7%	0.096866097
3	I would attach some importance to this	218	31.1%	0.310541311
4	I would attach quite a lot of importance to this	231	32.9%	0.329059829
5	I would attach great importance to this	130	18.5%	0.185185185
97	No answer	5	0.7%	0.007122507
98	Not asked	4749		NA

r5ran27

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical description:	[Randomiserer hvis u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1413] [Invalid:4038] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	732	51.8%	0.5180467
2	2	681	48.2%	0.4819533
Sysmiss		4038		NA

r5km8a

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: The government should spend more money in the country to prevent damage from rising sea levels, floods or landslides
Literal question:	Do you agree or disagree that the authorities should spend more money in the country as a whole to prevent damage from rising sea level, flooding or landslides?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 and ran27=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	130	17.8%	0.17759563
2	Agree	285	38.9%	0.38934426
3	Agree somewhat	194	26.5%	0.26502732
4	Neither agree nor disagree	76	10.4%	0.10382514
5	Disagree somewhat	21	2.9%	0.02868852
6	Disagree	10	1.4%	0.01366120
7	Strongly disagree	8	1.1%	0.01092896
97	No answer	8	1.1%	0.01092896
98	Not asked	4719		NA

r5km8b

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: The government should spend more money in your municipality to prevent damage from rising sea levels, floods or landslides
Literal question:	Do you agree or disagree that the authorities should spend more money in your municipality to prevent damage from rising sea level, flooding or landslides?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 and ran27=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	90	13.2%	0.13215859
2	Agree	193	28.3%	0.28340675
3	Agree somewhat	155	22.8%	0.22760646
4	Neither agree nor disagree	139	20.4%	0.20411160
5	Disagree somewhat	40	5.9%	0.05873715
6	Disagree	40	5.9%	0.05873715
7	Strongly disagree	17	2.5%	0.02496329
97	No answer	7	1.0%	0.01027900
98	Not asked	4770		NA

r5km9_1

Variable label:	Statement: Technological innovations will resolve our climate problems
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with them?
Literal question:	Technological innovations will resolve our climate problems.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	71	5.0%	0.04961565
2	Agree	220	15.4%	0.15373864
3	Agree somewhat	539	37.7%	0.37665968
4	Neither agree nor disagree	285	19.9%	0.19916143
5	Disagree somewhat	168	11.7%	0.11740042
6	Disagree	86	6.0%	0.06009783
7	Strongly disagree	24	1.7%	0.01677149
97	No answer	38	2.7%	0.02655486
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km9_2

Variable label:	Statement: Citizens in rich countries like Norway should reduce consumption to solve the climate challenge
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with them?
Literal question:	The citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption as part of the solution to the challenging climate changes facing us.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	226	15.8%	0.15793152
2	Agree	448	31.3%	0.31306778
3	Agree somewhat	442	30.9%	0.30887491
4	Neither agree nor disagree	132	9.2%	0.09224319
5	Disagree somewhat	59	4.1%	0.04122991
6	Disagree	56	3.9%	0.03913347
7	Strongly disagree	33	2.3%	0.02306080
97	No answer	35	2.4%	0.02445842
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km11

Variable label:	Would you say that your workplace is in the oil and gas industry, or closely associated with it?
Literal question:	Would you say that your workplace is in the oil and gas industry, or closely associated with it?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 and the respondent has received this question in previous waves without answering]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes, I work in the oil or gas industry	8	1.7%	0.01677149
2	Yes, my work is closely associated with the oil or gas industry	13	2.7%	0.02725367
3	No	429	89.9%	0.89937107
97	No answer	27	5.7%	0.05660377
98	Not asked	4974		NA

r5km6

Variable label:	How concerned are you about climate change?
Literal question:	How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very concerned	140	9.8%	0.09783368
2	Concerned	410	28.7%	0.28651293
3	Slightly concerned	547	38.2%	0.38225017
4	Not very concerned	252	17.6%	0.17610063
5	Not at all concerned	52	3.6%	0.03633823
97	No answer	30	2.1%	0.02096436
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5km10

Variable label:	Statements that describes your view on climate change
Literal question:	Based on what you know, which of the following statements best describes your views on climate change?
Technical description:	Select one of the alternatives. [Asked if u=2 and the respondent has received this question in previous waves without answering]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	I think that the climate is not changing.	0	0.0%	0.00000000
2	I don't know whether the climate is changing or not.	2	6.5%	0.06451613
3	I think that the climate is changing, but that it has only been slightly affected by humans.	10	32.3%	0.32258065
4	I think that the climate is changing, mainly as a result of human influences.	16	51.6%	0.51612903
97	No answer	3	9.7%	0.09677419
98	Not asked	5420		NA

r5ran1

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1411] [Invalid:4040] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	720	51.0%	0.5102764
2	2	691	49.0%	0.4897236
Sysmiss		4040		NA

r5oc4a_norm_array

Variable label:	Background variable for random selection of question in r5oc4a_norm
Technical description:	[Randomly chooses a value between 1 and 7, if u=2 and ran1=1. Thus selecting a random question in R5OC4a_norm]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1411] [Invalid:4040] [Range:0-7]

Value	Cases	Percentage
0	691	49.0%	0.48972360
1	110	7.8%	0.07795889
2	81	5.7%	0.05740609
3	100	7.1%	0.07087172
4	102	7.2%	0.07228916
5	115	8.2%	0.08150248
6	120	8.5%	0.08504607
7	92	6.5%	0.06520198
Sysmiss	4040		NA

r5oc4a_pos_array

Variable label:	Background variable for random selection of question in r5oc4a_pos
Technical description:	[Randomly chooses a value between 1 and 8, if u=2 and ran1=1. Thus selecting a random question in R5OC4a_pos]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1411] [Invalid:4040] [Range:0-8]

Value	Cases	Percentage
0	691	49.0%	0.48972360
1	83	5.9%	0.05882353
2	91	6.4%	0.06449327
3	100	7.1%	0.07087172
4	73	5.2%	0.05173636
5	109	7.7%	0.07725018
6	78	5.5%	0.05527994
7	90	6.4%	0.06378455
8	96	6.8%	0.06803685
Sysmiss	4040		NA

r5oc4a_norm_1

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: to protect the environment
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes in order to protect the environment?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_norm_array=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	23	20.9%	0.209090909
2	Somewhat willing	53	48.2%	0.481818182
3	Somewhat unwilling	23	20.9%	0.209090909
4	Not willing at all	10	9.1%	0.090909091
97	No answer	1	0.9%	0.009090909
98	Not asked	5341		NA

r5oc4a_norm_2

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: to protect the environment if the government reduced other taxes by the same amount
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes in order to protect the environment, if the government reduced other taxes you pay by the same amount?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_norm_array=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	33	40.7%	0.40740741
2	Somewhat willing	34	42.0%	0.41975309
3	Somewhat unwilling	8	9.9%	0.09876543
4	Not willing at all	6	7.4%	0.07407407
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	5370		NA

r5oc4a_norm_3

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: if the government used extra revenues on environmental protection
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes, if the government spent the extra money on protecting the environment?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_norm_array=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	14	14.0%	0.14
2	Somewhat willing	47	47.0%	0.47
3	Somewhat unwilling	21	21.0%	0.21
4	Not willing at all	16	16.0%	0.16
97	No answer	2	2.0%	0.02
98	Not asked	5351		NA

r5oc4a_norm_4

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: if authorities used extra revenues on environmental protection and other taxes were reduced by the same amount
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes, if the government spent the extra money on protecting the environment and reduced other taxes you pay by the same amount
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_norm_array=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	19	18.6%	0.18627451
2	Somewhat willing	55	53.9%	0.53921569
3	Somewhat unwilling	16	15.7%	0.15686275
4	Not willing at all	9	8.8%	0.08823529
97	No answer	3	2.9%	0.02941176
98	Not asked	5349		NA

r5oc4a_norm_5

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: if the government promised to spend extra revenues on environmental protection
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes, if the government promised it would spend the extra money on protecting the environment?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_norm_array=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	10	8.7%	0.086956522
2	Somewhat willing	70	60.9%	0.608695652
3	Somewhat unwilling	17	14.8%	0.147826087
4	Not willing at all	17	14.8%	0.147826087
97	No answer	1	0.9%	0.008695652
98	Not asked	5336		NA

r5oc4a_norm_6

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: if the government promised to spend extra income on environmental protection and reduced other taxes by the same amount
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes, if the government promised it would spend the extra money on protecting the environment and reduce other taxes you pay by the same amount?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_norm_array=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	24	20.0%	0.20000000
2	Somewhat willing	63	52.5%	0.52500000
3	Somewhat unwilling	21	17.5%	0.17500000
4	Not willing at all	10	8.3%	0.08333333
97	No answer	2	1.7%	0.01666667
98	Not asked	5331		NA

r5oc4a_norm_7

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: if the government promised to reduce other taxes by the same amount
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes in order to protect the environment, if the government promised to reduce other taxes you pay by the same amount?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_norm_array=7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	33	35.9%	0.35869565
2	Somewhat willing	42	45.7%	0.45652174
3	Somewhat unwilling	11	12.0%	0.11956522
4	Not willing at all	5	5.4%	0.05434783
97	No answer	1	1.1%	0.01086957
98	Not asked	5359		NA

r5oc4a_pos_1

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution is harming global health today?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution is harming global health today?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_pos_array=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	20	11.2%	0.11173184
2	2	27	15.1%	0.15083799
3	3	26	14.5%	0.14525140
4	4	8	4.5%	0.04469274
5	5 Not at all	2	1.1%	0.01117318
97	No answer	96	53.6%	0.53631285
98	Not asked	5272		NA

r5oc4a_pos_2

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution is harming the health of people in Norway today?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution is harming the health of people in Norway today?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_pos_array=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	4	4.4%	0.04395604
2	2	31	34.1%	0.34065934
3	3	32	35.2%	0.35164835
4	4	21	23.1%	0.23076923
5	5 Not at all	2	2.2%	0.02197802
97	No answer	1	1.1%	0.01098901
98	Not asked	5360		NA

r5oc4a_pos_3

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution will harm global health in the future?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution will harm global health in the future?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_pos_array=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	23	23.0%	0.23
2	2	37	37.0%	0.37
3	3	30	30.0%	0.30
4	4	7	7.0%	0.07
5	5 Not at all	0	0.0%	0.00
97	No answer	3	3.0%	0.03
98	Not asked	5351		NA

r5oc4a_pos_4

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution will harm the health of people in Norway in the future?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution will harm the health of people in Norway in the future?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_pos_array=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	11	15.1%	0.15068493
2	2	21	28.8%	0.28767123
3	3	32	43.8%	0.43835616
4	4	6	8.2%	0.08219178
5	5 Not at all	2	2.7%	0.02739726
97	No answer	1	1.4%	0.01369863
98	Not asked	5378		NA

r5oc4a_pos_5

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution is harming the global environment today?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution is harming the global environment today?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_pos_array=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	33	30.3%	0.3027523
2	2	47	43.1%	0.4311927
3	3	18	16.5%	0.1651376
4	4	11	10.1%	0.1009174
5	5 Not at all	0	0.0%	0.0000000
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	5342		NA

r5oc4a_pos_6

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution is harming the environment in Norway today?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution is harming the environment in Norway today?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_pos_array=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	11	14.1%	0.14102564
2	2	22	28.2%	0.28205128
3	3	35	44.9%	0.44871795
4	4	9	11.5%	0.11538462
5	5 Not at all	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	1	1.3%	0.01282051
98	Not asked	5373		NA

r5oc4a_pos_7

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution will harm the global environment in the future?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution will harm the global environment in the future?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_pos_array=7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	19	21.1%	0.21111111
2	2	43	47.8%	0.47777778
3	3	18	20.0%	0.20000000
4	4	9	10.0%	0.10000000
5	5 Not at all	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	1	1.1%	0.01111111
98	Not asked	5361		NA

r5oc4a_pos_8

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution will harm the environment in Norway in the future?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution will harm the environment in Norway in the future?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4a_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4a_pos_array=8]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	9	9.4%	0.09375000
2	2	42	43.8%	0.43750000
3	3	34	35.4%	0.35416667
4	4	10	10.4%	0.10416667
5	5 Not at all	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	1	1.0%	0.01041667
98	Not asked	5355		NA

r5oc4b_pos_array

Variable label:	Background variable for random selection of question in r5oc4b_pos
Technical description:	[Randomly chooses a value between 1 and 8, if u=2 and ran1=2. Thus selecting a random question in R5OC4b_pos]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1411] [Invalid:4040] [Range:0-8]

Value	Cases	Percentage
0	720	51.0%	0.51027640
1	65	4.6%	0.04606662
2	81	5.7%	0.05740609
3	84	6.0%	0.05953225
4	88	6.2%	0.06236712
5	79	5.6%	0.05598866
6	109	7.7%	0.07725018
7	84	6.0%	0.05953225
8	101	7.2%	0.07158044
Sysmiss	4040		NA

r5oc4b_norm_array

Variable label:	Background variable for random selection of question in r5oc4b_norm
Technical description:	[Randomly chooses a value between 1 and 7, if u=2 and ran1=2. Thus selecting a random question in R5OC4b_norm]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1411] [Invalid:4040] [Range:0-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	91	6.4%	0.06449327
0		720	51.0%	0.51027640
2		99	7.0%	0.07016300
3		107	7.6%	0.07583274
4		92	6.5%	0.06520198
5		86	6.1%	0.06094968
6		121	8.6%	0.08575478
7		95	6.7%	0.06732814
Sysmiss		4040		NA

r5oc4b_pos_1

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution is harming global health today?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution is harming global health today?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_pos_array=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	12	18.5%	0.18461538
2	2	33	50.8%	0.50769231
3	3	17	26.2%	0.26153846
4	4	3	4.6%	0.04615385
5	5 Not at all	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	5386		NA

r5oc4b_pos_2

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution is harming the health of people in Norway today?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution is harming the health of people in Norway today?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_pos_array=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	2	2.5%	0.02469136
2	2	24	29.6%	0.29629630
3	3	33	40.7%	0.40740741
4	4	19	23.5%	0.23456790
5	5 Not at all	1	1.2%	0.01234568
97	No answer	2	2.5%	0.02469136
98	Not asked	5370		NA

r5oc4b_pos_3

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution will harm global health in the future?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution will harm global health in the future?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_pos_array=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	17	20.2%	0.20238095
2	2	31	36.9%	0.36904762
3	3	30	35.7%	0.35714286
4	4	5	6.0%	0.05952381
5	5 Not at all	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	1	1.2%	0.01190476
98	Not asked	5367		NA

r5oc4b_pos_4

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution will harm the health of people in Norway in the future?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution will harm the health of people in Norway in the future?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_pos_array=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	3	3.4%	0.03409091
2	2	32	36.4%	0.36363636
3	3	35	39.8%	0.39772727
4	4	16	18.2%	0.18181818
5	5 Not at all	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	2	2.3%	0.02272727
98	Not asked	5363		NA

r5oc4b_pos_5

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution is harming the global environment today?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution is harming the global environment today?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_pos_array=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	23	29.1%	0.29113924
2	2	28	35.4%	0.35443038
3	3	20	25.3%	0.25316456
4	4	7	8.9%	0.08860759
5	5 Not at all	1	1.3%	0.01265823
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	5372		NA

r5oc4b_pos_6

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution is harming the environment in Norway today?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution is harming the environment in Norway today?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_pos_array=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	11	10.1%	0.1009174
2	2	37	33.9%	0.3394495
3	3	48	44.0%	0.4403670
4	4	13	11.9%	0.1192661
5	5 Not at all	0	0.0%	0.0000000
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	5342		NA

r5oc4b_pos_7

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution will harm the global environment in the future?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution will harm the global environment in the future?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_pos_array=7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	19	22.6%	0.22619048
2	2	33	39.3%	0.39285714
3	3	23	27.4%	0.27380952
4	4	8	9.5%	0.09523810
5	5 Not at all	1	1.2%	0.01190476
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	5367		NA

r5oc4b_pos_8

Variable label:	How much do you think pollution will harm the environment in Norway in the future?
Literal question:	How much do you think pollution will harm the environment in Norway in the future?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_pos at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_pos_array=8]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Very much	8	7.9%	0.07920792
2	2	33	32.7%	0.32673267
3	3	37	36.6%	0.36633663
4	4	18	17.8%	0.17821782
5	5 Not at all	5	5.0%	0.04950495
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	5350		NA

r5oc4b_norm_1

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: to protect the environment
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes in order to protect the environment?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_norm_array=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	23	25.3%	0.2527473
2	Somewhat willing	39	42.9%	0.4285714
3	Somewhat unwilling	20	22.0%	0.2197802
4	Not willing at all	9	9.9%	0.0989011
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.0000000
98	Not asked	5360		NA

r5oc4b_norm_2

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: to protect the environment if the government reduced other taxes by the same amount
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes in order to protect the environment, if the government reduced other taxes you pay by the same amount?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_norm_array=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	29	29.3%	0.29292929
2	Somewhat willing	46	46.5%	0.46464646
3	Somewhat unwilling	12	12.1%	0.12121212
4	Not willing at all	7	7.1%	0.07070707
97	No answer	5	5.1%	0.05050505
98	Not asked	5352		NA

r5oc4b_norm_3

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: if the government used extra revenues on environmental protection
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes, if the government spent the extra money on protecting the environment?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_norm_array=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	17	15.9%	0.158878505
2	Somewhat willing	52	48.6%	0.485981308
3	Somewhat unwilling	21	19.6%	0.196261682
4	Not willing at all	16	15.0%	0.149532710
97	No answer	1	0.9%	0.009345794
98	Not asked	5344		NA

r5oc4b_norm_4

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: if authorities used extra revenues on environmental protection and other taxes were reduced by the same amount
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes, if the government spent the extra money on protecting the environment?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_norm_array=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	20	21.7%	0.21739130
2	Somewhat willing	46	50.0%	0.50000000
3	Somewhat unwilling	17	18.5%	0.18478261
4	Not willing at all	8	8.7%	0.08695652
97	No answer	1	1.1%	0.01086957
98	Not asked	5359		NA

r5oc4b_norm_5

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: if the government promised to spend extra revenues on environmental protection
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes, if the government promised it would spend the extra money on protecting the environment?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_norm_array=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	17	19.8%	0.19767442
2	Somewhat willing	43	50.0%	0.50000000
3	Somewhat unwilling	15	17.4%	0.17441860
4	Not willing at all	10	11.6%	0.11627907
97	No answer	1	1.2%	0.01162791
98	Not asked	5365		NA

r5oc4b_norm_6

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: if the government promised to spend extra income on environmental protection and reduced other taxes by the same amount
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes, if the government promised it would spend the extra money on protecting the environment and reduce other taxes you pay by the same amount?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_norm_array=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	27	22.3%	0.22314050
2	Somewhat willing	55	45.5%	0.45454545
3	Somewhat unwilling	19	15.7%	0.15702479
4	Not willing at all	16	13.2%	0.13223140
97	No answer	4	3.3%	0.03305785
98	Not asked	5330		NA

r5oc4b_norm_7

Variable label:	Willing to pay higher taxes: if the government promised to reduce other taxes by the same amount
Literal question:	How willing would you be to pay higher taxes in order to protect the environment, if the government promised to reduce other taxes you pay by the same amount?
Technical description:	[Respondents are asked a question in R5OC4b_norm at random. Asked if u=2, ran1=1 and r5oc4b_norm_array=7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very willing	31	32.6%	0.32631579
2	Somewhat willing	50	52.6%	0.52631579
3	Somewhat unwilling	10	10.5%	0.10526316
4	Not willing at all	3	3.2%	0.03157895
97	No answer	1	1.1%	0.01052632
98	Not asked	5356		NA

r5km12

Variable label:	Thought Experiment: 900 kr for the other and 100 kr for you
Literal question:	Now for a thinking experiment: imagine that a stranger on the street asks you and another random passer-by to play a game. The idea of the game is that this stranger wishes to share 1,000 kroner between you and the other player. The stranger proposes to give 900 kroner to the other player and 100 kroner to you. You can say either yes or no to this offer. If you say yes, you get the amount that the stranger suggested. If you say no, neither you nor the other player gets anything. What would you do in this situation?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2 OR u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Say yes and accept the offer	1295	47.8%	0.47821270
2	Say no and reject the offer	1321	48.8%	0.48781388
97	No answer	92	3.4%	0.03397341
98	Not asked	2743		NA

r5ran5

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1408] [Invalid:4043] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	452	32.1%	0.3210227
2	2	514	36.5%	0.3650568
3	3	442	31.4%	0.3139205
Sysmiss		4043		NA

r5oc6

Variable label:	Mauritius: Difficult economic conditions mean that people can be compared to very sick or paralyzed patients
Pre-question text:	Foreign aid is money that the Norwegian government sends to people in poor countries to help them fight poverty. A lot of the aid money that the Norway sends overseas goes to less developed countries like Mauritius [and poor Mauritian families like the one pictured above.] The families often receive the aid as particular goods and services, such as school materials or doctors visits. Please answer the following questions. Don’t worry if you’ve never heard of Mauritius or don’t know much about it. Just give your best answers. For the first three questions, 1 means you agree completely with the statement on the left; 5 means you agree completely with the statement on the right. If your views fall somewhere in between, you can choose any number in between.
Literal question:	Because of difficult economic circumstances, people in Mauritius are like extremely sick or paralyzed patients. They ARE COMPLETELY UNABLE to help themselves / Despite difficult economic circumstances, individuals in Mauritius ARE ABLE to do things that can help themselves get richer
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Because of difficult economic circumstances, people in Mauritius are like extremely sick or paralyzed patients. They ARE COMPLETELY UNABLE to help themselves	19	1.3%	0.01327743
2	2	95	6.6%	0.06638714
3	3	417	29.1%	0.29140461
4	4	367	25.6%	0.25646401
5	5 Despite difficult economic circumstances, individuals in Mauritius ARE ABLE to do things that can help themselves get richer	467	32.6%	0.32634521
97	No answer	66	4.6%	0.04612159
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5oc7

Variable label:	Mauritius: Regarding welfare, the individuals are victims of circumstances beyond their control
Pre-question text:	Foreign aid is money that the Norwegian government sends to people in poor countries to help them fight poverty. A lot of the aid money that the Norway sends overseas goes to less developed countries like Mauritius [and poor Mauritian families like the one pictured above.] The families often receive the aid as particular goods and services, such as school materials or doctors visits. Please answer the following questions. Don’t worry if you’ve never heard of Mauritius or don’t know much about it. Just give your best answers. For the first three questions, 1 means you agree completely with the statement on the left; 5 means you agree completely with the statement on the right. If your views fall somewhere in between, you can choose any number in between.
Literal question:	When it comes to their well-being, individuals in Mauritius are victims of circumstances beyond their control / Individuals in Mauritius are capable of taking planned actions that improve their economic well-being
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 When it comes to their well-being, individuals in Mauritius are victims of circumstances beyond their control	84	5.9%	0.05870021
2	2	267	18.7%	0.18658281
3	3	470	32.8%	0.32844165
4	4	273	19.1%	0.19077568
5	5 Individuals in Mauritius are capable of taking planned actions that improve their economic well-being	250	17.5%	0.17470300
97	No answer	87	6.1%	0.06079665
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5oc8

Variable label:	Mauritius: There is a lot of Mauritius and its inhabitants themselves can do to change their situation
Pre-question text:	Foreign aid is money that the Norwegian government sends to people in poor countries to help them fight poverty. A lot of the aid money that the Norway sends overseas goes to less developed countries like Mauritius [and poor Mauritian families like the one pictured above.] The families often receive the aid as particular goods and services, such as school materials or doctors visits. Please answer the following questions. Don’t worry if you’ve never heard of Mauritius or don’t know much about it. Just give your best answers. For the first three questions, 1 means you agree completely with the statement on the left; 5 means you agree completely with the statement on the right. If your views fall somewhere in between, you can choose any number in between.
Literal question:	There is A LOT that Mauritius and its citizens can do by themselves to improve their own livelihoods / There is LITTLE that Mauritius and its citizens can do by themselves to improve their own livelihoods
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 There is A LOT that Mauritius and its citizens can do by themselves to improve their own livelihoods	268	18.7%	0.18728162
2	2	401	28.0%	0.28022362
3	3	552	38.6%	0.38574423
4	4	115	8.0%	0.08036338
5	5 There is LITTLE that Mauritius and its citizens can do by themselves to improve their own livelihoods	22	1.5%	0.01537386
97	No answer	73	5.1%	0.05101328
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5oc9

Variable label:	How close do you feel culturally to the people of Mauritius?
Literal question:	How close do you feel culturally to the people of Mauritius?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very close	12	0.8%	0.008385744
2	Somewhat close	185	12.9%	0.129280224
3	Only a little bit close	398	27.8%	0.278127184
4	Not close at all	760	53.1%	0.531097135
97	No answer	76	5.3%	0.053109713
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5oc10

Variable label:	How much would it bother you if an immigrant from Mauritius married a relative of yours?
Literal question:	How much would it bother you if an immigrant from Mauritius married a relative of yours?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Would not bother me at all	783	54.7%	0.54716981
2	Would bother me slightly	453	31.7%	0.31656184
3	Would bother me a good deal	91	6.4%	0.06359189
4	Would bother me a lot	31	2.2%	0.02166317
97	No answer	73	5.1%	0.05101328
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5oc11

Variable label:	How much per capita Norwegian do you think the government should spend on foreign aid?
Literal question:	Each year the Norwegian government gives about $600 of each Norwegian’s income to foreign countries as foreign aid. Many people think this is too low, others think it is too high, and still others think it is about right. How much per Norwegian do you think the government should spend on foreign aid?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	$0. Norway should not give any foreign aid	35	2.4%	0.02445842
2	$1 to $299. Norway should lower the amount by a lot	109	7.6%	0.07617051
3	$300 to $599. Norway should lower the amount by a little	153	10.7%	0.10691824
4	$600. The current amount is about right	641	44.8%	0.44793850
5	$601 to $899. Norway should raise the amount by a little	249	17.4%	0.17400419
6	$900 to $1199. Norway should raise the amount by a lot	96	6.7%	0.06708595
7	$1200 or more. Norway should raise the amount by a huge sum	82	5.7%	0.05730259
97	No answer	66	4.6%	0.04612159
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5oc12

Variable label:	Should Norway’s foreign aid to Mauritius increased, reduced or kept equal
Literal question:	What about aid to Mauritius specifically? Last year, foreign aid from wealthy countries to Mauritius was about 1% of that country’s total income. Do you think that Norwegian spending on foreign aid to Mauritius should increase, decrease or be kept about the same?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	It should decrease to zero	41	2.9%	0.02865129
2	It should decrease a lot	63	4.4%	0.04402516
3	It should decrease a little	120	8.4%	0.08385744
4	It should stay the same	702	49.1%	0.49056604
5	It should increase a little	321	22.4%	0.22431866
6	It should increase a lot	61	4.3%	0.04262753
7	It should increase by a huge sum	18	1.3%	0.01257862
97	No answer	105	7.3%	0.07337526
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5oc13

Variable label:	Statement: Norway has a moral obligation to provide financial assistance to poor countries like Mauritius
Literal question:	Norway DOES have a moral obligation to financially assist foreign poor countries like Mauritius
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Norway DOES have a moral obligation to financially assist foreign poor countries like Mauritius	464	32.4%	0.32424878
2	2	344	24.0%	0.24039133
3	3	342	23.9%	0.23899371
4	4	112	7.8%	0.07826695
5	5 Norway DOES NOT have a moral obligation to financially assist foreign poor countries like Mauritius	104	7.3%	0.07267645
97	No answer	65	4.5%	0.04542278
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5oc14

Variable label:	What percentage of Mauritius’ population think you are black?
Literal question:	What percent of people in Mauritius are black?
Technical description:	Note that you have only 15 seconds to answer this question. Just take your best guess if you do not know. [Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 %.	14	1.0%	0.009783368
2	10 %.	54	3.8%	0.037735849
3	20 %.	94	6.6%	0.065688330
4	30 %.	148	10.3%	0.103424179
5	40 %.	140	9.8%	0.097833683
6	50 %.	200	14.0%	0.139762404
7	60 %.	180	12.6%	0.125786164
8	70 %.	203	14.2%	0.141858840
9	80 %.	158	11.0%	0.110412299
10	90 %.	134	9.4%	0.093640811
11	100 %.	24	1.7%	0.016771488
97	No answer	82	5.7%	0.057302586
98	Not asked	4020		NA

r5oc15_1

Variable label:	News about African countries: Violence, war and terrorism
Pre-question text:	When you think about news stories you have heard about African countries, which of the following topics come to mind? You may choose up to two.
Literal question:	Violence, war, and terrorism
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Violence, war, and terrorism	876	61.2%	0.61215933
97	No answer	41	2.9%	0.02865129
98	Not asked	4020		NA
0		514	35.9%	0.35918938

r5oc15_2

Variable label:	News about African countries: Business, markets, and trade
Pre-question text:	When you think about news stories you have heard about African countries, which of the following topics come to mind? You may choose up to two.
Literal question:	Business, markets, and trade
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Business, markets, and trade	59	4.1%	0.04122991
97	No answer	41	2.9%	0.02865129
98	Not asked	4020		NA
0		1331	93.0%	0.93011880

r5oc15_3

Variable label:	News about African countries: Growing economies
Pre-question text:	When you think about news stories you have heard about African countries, which of the following topics come to mind? You may choose up to two.
Literal question:	Growing economies
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Growing economies	282	19.7%	0.19706499
97	No answer	41	2.9%	0.02865129
98	Not asked	4020		NA
0		1108	77.4%	0.77428372

r5oc15_4

Variable label:	News about African countries: Poverty, hunger, and famine
Pre-question text:	When you think about news stories you have heard about African countries, which of the following topics come to mind? You may choose up to two.
Literal question:	Poverty, hunger, and famine
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Poverty, hunger, and famine	723	50.5%	0.50524109
97	No answer	41	2.9%	0.02865129
98	Not asked	4020		NA
0		667	46.6%	0.46610762

r5oc15_5

Variable label:	News about African countries: HIV/AIDS, Ebola, and other diseases
Pre-question text:	When you think about news stories you have heard about African countries, which of the following topics come to mind? You may choose up to two.
Literal question:	HIV/AIDS, Ebola, and other diseases
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	HIV/AIDS, Ebola, and other diseases	552	38.6%	0.38574423
97	No answer	41	2.9%	0.02865129
98	Not asked	4020		NA
0		838	58.6%	0.58560447

r5oc15_6

Variable label:	News about African countries: Entertainment and sports
Pre-question text:	When you think about news stories you have heard about African countries, which of the following topics come to mind? You may choose up to two.
Literal question:	Entertainment and sports
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Entertainment and sports	16	1.1%	0.01118099
97	No answer	41	2.9%	0.02865129
98	Not asked	4020		NA
0		1374	96.0%	0.96016771

r5oc15_7

Variable label:	News about African countries: Other
Pre-question text:	When you think about news stories you have heard about African countries, which of the following topics come to mind? You may choose up to two.
Literal question:	Other (fill in the blank)
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Other (fill in the blank)	32	2.2%	0.02236198
97	No answer	41	2.9%	0.02865129
98	Not asked	4020		NA
0		1358	94.9%	0.94898672

r5oc15_8

Variable label:	News about African countries: I do not hear news about African countries
Pre-question text:	When you think about news stories you have heard about African countries, which of the following topics come to mind? You may choose up to two.
Literal question:	I do not hear news about African countries
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	I do not hear news about African countries	12	0.8%	0.008385744
97	No answer	41	2.9%	0.028651293
98	Not asked	4020		NA
0		1378	96.3%	0.962962963

r5oc15_7_other

Variable label:	News about African countries: Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Technical description:	[Asked if u=2. Note: If ran5=1 Or 2=Respondents was exposed to vizual stimulation, if ran5=3 respondents was not exposed to vizual stimulation See appendix.] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5ocrecsm5a_1

Variable label:	1-10, Extremely: satisfied with the current economic situation in Norway
Literal question:	On the whole how satisfied are you with the present state of the economy in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Extremely dissatisfied	3	0.7%	0.007263923
2	1	3	0.7%	0.007263923
3	2	6	1.5%	0.014527845
4	3	19	4.6%	0.046004843
5	4	21	5.1%	0.050847458
6	5	64	15.5%	0.154963680
7	6	54	13.1%	0.130750605
8	7	111	26.9%	0.268765133
9	8	95	23.0%	0.230024213
10	9	27	6.5%	0.065375303
11	10 Extremely satisfied	3	0.7%	0.007263923
97	No answer	7	1.7%	0.016949153
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm5b_1

Variable label:	1-10, Very: satisfied with the current economic situation in Norway
Literal question:	On the whole how satisfied are you with the present state of the economy in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Very dissatisfied	3	0.7%	0.00678733
2	1	3	0.7%	0.00678733
3	2	12	2.7%	0.02714932
4	3	21	4.8%	0.04751131
5	4	29	6.6%	0.06561086
6	5	54	12.2%	0.12217195
7	6	64	14.5%	0.14479638
8	7	105	23.8%	0.23755656
9	8	87	19.7%	0.19683258
10	9	36	8.1%	0.08144796
11	10 Very satisfied	23	5.2%	0.05203620
97	No answer	5	1.1%	0.01131222
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm5c_1

Variable label:	1-10, Very: satisfied with the current economic situation in Norway
Literal question:	On the whole how satisfied are you with the present state of the economy in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Very dissatisfied	4	0.9%	0.009478673
2	1	2	0.5%	0.004739336
3	2	4	0.9%	0.009478673
4	3	21	5.0%	0.049763033
5	4	40	9.5%	0.094786730
6	5	61	14.5%	0.144549763
7	6	63	14.9%	0.149289100
8	7	115	27.3%	0.272511848
9	8	70	16.6%	0.165876777
10	9	23	5.5%	0.054502370
11	10 Very satisfied	11	2.6%	0.026066351
97	No answer	8	1.9%	0.018957346
98	Not asked	5029		NA

r5ocrecsm6a_1

Variable label:	1-10, Extremely: satisfied with the way the government is doing its job
Literal question:	Now thinking about the Norwegian government, how satisfied are you with the way it is doing its job?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Extremely dissatisfied	14	3.4%	0.03389831
2	1	9	2.2%	0.02179177
3	2	21	5.1%	0.05084746
4	3	59	14.3%	0.14285714
5	4	45	10.9%	0.10895884
6	5	68	16.5%	0.16464891
7	6	57	13.8%	0.13801453
8	7	68	16.5%	0.16464891
9	8	51	12.3%	0.12348668
10	9	10	2.4%	0.02421308
11	10 Extremely satisfied	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	11	2.7%	0.02663438
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm6b_1

Variable label:	1-10, Very: satisfied with the way the government is doing its job
Literal question:	Now thinking about the Norwegian government, how satisfied are you with the way it is doing its job?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Very dissatisfied	18	4.1%	0.04072398
2	1	7	1.6%	0.01583710
3	2	41	9.3%	0.09276018
4	3	55	12.4%	0.12443439
5	4	51	11.5%	0.11538462
6	5	56	12.7%	0.12669683
7	6	69	15.6%	0.15610860
8	7	66	14.9%	0.14932127
9	8	53	12.0%	0.11990950
10	9	15	3.4%	0.03393665
11	10 Very satisfied	5	1.1%	0.01131222
97	No answer	6	1.4%	0.01357466
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm6c_1

Variable label:	1-10, Very: satisfied with the way the government is doing its job
Literal question:	Now thinking about the Norwegian government, how satisfied are you with the way it is doing its job?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Very dissatisfied	15	3.6%	0.035545024
2	1	21	5.0%	0.049763033
3	2	20	4.7%	0.047393365
4	3	50	11.8%	0.118483412
5	4	45	10.7%	0.106635071
6	5	61	14.5%	0.144549763
7	6	56	13.3%	0.132701422
8	7	86	20.4%	0.203791469
9	8	42	10.0%	0.099526066
10	9	13	3.1%	0.030805687
11	10 Very satisfied	1	0.2%	0.002369668
97	No answer	12	2.8%	0.028436019
98	Not asked	5029		NA

r5ocrecsm7a_1

Variable label:	1-10, Extremely: satisfied with the way democracy works
Literal question:	And on the whole, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Extremely dissatisfied	4	1.0%	0.009685230
2	1	3	0.7%	0.007263923
3	2	4	1.0%	0.009685230
4	3	11	2.7%	0.026634383
5	4	27	6.5%	0.065375303
6	5	41	9.9%	0.099273608
7	6	47	11.4%	0.113801453
8	7	98	23.7%	0.237288136
9	8	110	26.6%	0.266343826
10	9	50	12.1%	0.121065375
11	10 Extremely satisfied	10	2.4%	0.024213075
97	No answer	8	1.9%	0.019370460
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm7b_1

Variable label:	1-10, Very: satisfied with the way democracy works
Literal question:	And on the whole, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Very dissatisfied	3	0.7%	0.00678733
2	1	5	1.1%	0.01131222
3	2	10	2.3%	0.02262443
4	3	11	2.5%	0.02488688
5	4	24	5.4%	0.05429864
6	5	41	9.3%	0.09276018
7	6	45	10.2%	0.10180995
8	7	95	21.5%	0.21493213
9	8	100	22.6%	0.22624434
10	9	62	14.0%	0.14027149
11	10 Very satisfied	37	8.4%	0.08371041
97	No answer	9	2.0%	0.02036199
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm7c_1

Variable label:	1-10, Very: satisfied with the way democracy works
Literal question:	And on the whole, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Very dissatisfied	2	0.5%	0.004739336
2	1	3	0.7%	0.007109005
3	2	4	0.9%	0.009478673
4	3	15	3.6%	0.035545024
5	4	32	7.6%	0.075829384
6	5	42	10.0%	0.099526066
7	6	36	8.5%	0.085308057
8	7	94	22.3%	0.222748815
9	8	106	25.1%	0.251184834
10	9	46	10.9%	0.109004739
11	10 Very satisfied	25	5.9%	0.059241706
97	No answer	17	4.0%	0.040284360
98	Not asked	5029		NA

r5ocrecsm8a_1

Variable label:	1-10, Trust: The parliament
Pre-question text:	Please indicate on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of these institutions. 0 means you do not trust the institution at all and 10 means you have complete trust.
Literal question:	The parliament
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not trust at all	4	1.0%	0.00968523
2	1	5	1.2%	0.01210654
3	2	6	1.5%	0.01452785
4	3	13	3.1%	0.03147700
5	4	27	6.5%	0.06537530
6	5	37	9.0%	0.08958838
7	6	56	13.6%	0.13559322
8	7	70	16.9%	0.16949153
9	8	104	25.2%	0.25181598
10	9	55	13.3%	0.13317191
11	10 Complete trust	27	6.5%	0.06537530
97	No answer	9	2.2%	0.02179177
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm8a_2

Variable label:	1-10, Trust: The judiciary
Pre-question text:	Please indicate on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of these institutions. 0 means you do not trust the institution at all and 10 means you have complete trust.
Literal question:	The judiciary
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not trust at all	1	0.2%	0.002421308
2	1	5	1.2%	0.012106538
3	2	4	1.0%	0.009685230
4	3	8	1.9%	0.019370460
5	4	10	2.4%	0.024213075
6	5	22	5.3%	0.053268765
7	6	29	7.0%	0.070217918
8	7	53	12.8%	0.128329298
9	8	103	24.9%	0.249394673
10	9	97	23.5%	0.234866828
11	10 Complete trust	70	16.9%	0.169491525
97	No answer	11	2.7%	0.026634383
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm8a_3

Variable label:	1-10, Trust: The police
Pre-question text:	Please indicate on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of these institutions. 0 means you do not trust the institution at all and 10 means you have complete trust.
Literal question:	The police
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 Not trust at all	2	0.5%	0.004842615
2	1	7	1.7%	0.016949153
3	2	3	0.7%	0.007263923
4	3	7	1.7%	0.016949153
5	4	13	3.1%	0.031476998
6	5	29	7.0%	0.070217918
7	6	36	8.7%	0.087167070
8	7	68	16.5%	0.164648910
9	8	105	25.4%	0.254237288
10	9	85	20.6%	0.205811138
11	10 Complete trust	47	11.4%	0.113801453
97	No answer	11	2.7%	0.026634383
98	Not asked	5038		NA

r5ocrecsm8b_1

Variable label:	1-5, Trust: The parliament
Pre-question text:	Please mark how much you personally trust each of the institutions and actors listed below.
Literal question:	The parliament
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 No trust at all	6	1.4%	0.01357466
2	1	27	6.1%	0.06108597
3	2	108	24.4%	0.24434389
4	3	220	49.8%	0.49773756
5	4 Complete trust	74	16.7%	0.16742081
97	No answer	7	1.6%	0.01583710
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm8b_2

Variable label:	1-5, Trust: The judiciary
Pre-question text:	Please mark how much you personally trust each of the institutions and actors listed below.
Literal question:	The judiciary
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 No trust at all	5	1.1%	0.01131222
2	1	19	4.3%	0.04298643
3	2	59	13.3%	0.13348416
4	3	195	44.1%	0.44117647
5	4 Complete trust	156	35.3%	0.35294118
97	No answer	8	1.8%	0.01809955
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm8b_3

Variable label:	1-5, Trust: The police
Pre-question text:	Please mark how much you personally trust each of the institutions and actors listed below.
Literal question:	The police
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 No trust at all	10	2.3%	0.02262443
2	1	28	6.3%	0.06334842
3	2	73	16.5%	0.16515837
4	3	216	48.9%	0.48868778
5	4 Complete trust	108	24.4%	0.24434389
97	No answer	7	1.6%	0.01583710
98	Not asked	5009		NA

r5ocrecsm8c_1

Variable label:	1-5, Trust: The parliament
Pre-question text:	Please mark how much you personally trust each of the institutions and actors listed below.
Literal question:	The parliament
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 No trust at all	6	1.4%	0.01421801
2	1	21	5.0%	0.04976303
3	2	105	24.9%	0.24881517
4	3	212	50.2%	0.50236967
5	4 Complete trust	66	15.6%	0.15639810
97	No answer	12	2.8%	0.02843602
98	Not asked	5029		NA

r5ocrecsm8c_2

Variable label:	1-5, Trust: The judiciary
Pre-question text:	Please mark how much you personally trust each of the institutions and actors listed below.
Literal question:	The judiciary
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 No trust at all	3	0.7%	0.007109005
2	1	12	2.8%	0.028436019
3	2	69	16.4%	0.163507109
4	3	227	53.8%	0.537914692
5	4 Complete trust	99	23.5%	0.234597156
97	No answer	12	2.8%	0.028436019
98	Not asked	5029		NA

r5ocrecsm8c_3

Variable label:	1-5, Trust: The police
Pre-question text:	Please mark how much you personally trust each of the institutions and actors listed below.
Literal question:	The police
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	0 No trust at all	4	0.9%	0.009478673
2	1	26	6.2%	0.061611374
3	2	89	21.1%	0.210900474
4	3	224	53.1%	0.530805687
5	4 Complete trust	66	15.6%	0.156398104
97	No answer	13	3.1%	0.030805687
98	Not asked	5029		NA

r5dv1

Variable label:	Advantage / disadvantage for Norway that immigrants are coming to live here
Literal question:	In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very great advantage	21	1.5%	0.014809591
2	Great advantage	204	14.4%	0.143864598
3	Slightly advantageous	487	34.3%	0.343441467
4	Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage	220	15.5%	0.155148096
5	A slight disadvantage	294	20.7%	0.207334274
6	A great disadvantage	122	8.6%	0.086036671
7	Very great disadvantage	57	4.0%	0.040197461
97	No answer	13	0.9%	0.009167842
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv4

Variable label:	How important is immigration policy to you personally?
Literal question:	How important is immigration policy to you personally?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very important	200	14.1%	0.141043724
2	Important	557	39.3%	0.392806770
3	Somewhat important	525	37.0%	0.370239774
4	Not very important	114	8.0%	0.080394922
5	Not important at all	11	0.8%	0.007757405
97	No answer	11	0.8%	0.007757405
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv6

Variable label:	Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
Literal question:	Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Labour Party	276	19.5%	0.194640339
2	The Progress Party	304	21.4%	0.214386460
3	The Conservative Party	196	13.8%	0.138222849
4	The Socialist Left Party	105	7.4%	0.074047955
5	The Centre Party	29	2.0%	0.020451340
6	The Christian Democrats	95	6.7%	0.066995769
7	The Liberal Party	74	5.2%	0.052186178
8	The Red Party	29	2.0%	0.020451340
9	The Green Party	14	1.0%	0.009873061
10	Other	11	0.8%	0.007757405
11	None	237	16.7%	0.167136812
97	No answer	48	3.4%	0.033850494
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv6_10_other

Variable label:	Which party do you think has the best immigration policy, other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5ran6

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1410] [Invalid:4041] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	691	49.0%	0.4900709
2	2	719	51.0%	0.5099291
Sysmiss		4041		NA

r5rom1a_LL_negative

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent express a general negative attitude?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	384	55.6%	0.5557164
1	Yes	223	32.3%	0.3227207
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.1215630
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_positive

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent express a general positive attitude?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	594	86.0%	0.85962373
1	Yes	13	1.9%	0.01881331
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.12156295
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_neutral

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent express a general neutral attitude?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	236	34.2%	0.341534
1	Yes	371	53.7%	0.536903
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.121563
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_mentroma

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent mention ‘Roma people’ or similar?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	451	65.3%	0.6526773
1	Yes	156	22.6%	0.2257598
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.1215630
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_foreign

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent mention foreign countries or foreign citizens?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	394	57.0%	0.5701881
1	Yes	213	30.8%	0.3082489
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.1215630
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_homeless

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent mention ‘homeless’ or synonymous words?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	539	78.0%	0.7800289
1	Yes	68	9.8%	0.0984081
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.1215630
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_sympathy

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent express sympathy?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	571	82.6%	0.82633864
1	Yes	36	5.2%	0.05209841
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.12156295
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_poor

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent mention poverty?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	448	64.8%	0.6483357
1	Yes	159	23.0%	0.2301013
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.1215630
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_immigration

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent relate this word to immigration policies?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	559	80.9%	0.80897250
1	Yes	48	6.9%	0.06946454
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.12156295
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_welfare

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent relate this word to welfare policies?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	555	80.3%	0.80318379
1	Yes	52	7.5%	0.07525326
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.12156295
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_reason

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent question the reason for begging?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	586	84.8%	0.84804631
1	Yes	21	3.0%	0.03039074
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.12156295
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_organized

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent mention the word organized or similar?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	561	81.2%	0.81186686
1	Yes	46	6.7%	0.06657019
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.12156295
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_criminal

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent mention ‘criminal’ or criminal activities?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	560	81.0%	0.81041968
1	Yes	47	6.8%	0.06801737
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.12156295
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_workattitude

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent mention work attitude or similar?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	572	82.8%	0.82778582
1	Yes	35	5.1%	0.05065123
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.12156295
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_lazy

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent mention the word ‘lazy’ or synonymous words?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	590	85.4%	0.85383502
1	Yes	17	2.5%	0.02460203
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.12156295
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_beggarscup

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent mention the beggars cup?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	565	81.8%	0.81765557
1	Yes	42	6.1%	0.06078148
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.12156295
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1a_LL_gypsy

Variable label:	Beggers: Does the respondent mention the word gypsy or ‘sigøyner’?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the word “beggar”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	594	86.0%	0.85962373
1	Yes	13	1.9%	0.01881331
97	No answer	84	12.2%	0.12156295
98	Not asked	4760		NA

r5rom1b_LL_negative

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent express a general negative attitude?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	451	62.7%	0.6272601
1	Yes	185	25.7%	0.2573018
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.1154381
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_positive

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent express a general positive attitude?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	617	85.8%	0.85813630
1	Yes	19	2.6%	0.02642559
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.11543811
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_neutral

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent express a general neutral attitude?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	207	28.8%	0.2878999
1	Yes	429	59.7%	0.5966620
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.1154381
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_mentbeggar

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention the word beggar or synonymous words?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	372	51.7%	0.5173853
1	Yes	264	36.7%	0.3671766
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.1154381
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_poor

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention ‘poverty’ or synonymous words?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	535	74.4%	0.7440890
1	Yes	101	14.0%	0.1404729
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.1154381
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_sympathy

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent express sympathy?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	616	85.7%	0.85674548
1	Yes	20	2.8%	0.02781641
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.11543811
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_discrimination

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention discrimination or similar terms?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	546	75.9%	0.7593880
1	Yes	90	12.5%	0.1251739
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.1154381
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_integration

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention integration work or similar?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	605	84.1%	0.84144645
1	Yes	31	4.3%	0.04311544
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.11543811
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_lazy

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention the word ‘lazy’ or synonymous words?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	624	86.8%	0.86787204
1	Yes	12	1.7%	0.01668985
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.11543811
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_workattitude

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention work attitude or similar?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	613	85.3%	0.85257302
1	Yes	23	3.2%	0.03198887
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.11543811
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_globalization

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent relate this word to immigration policies or global issues?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	600	83.4%	0.83449235
1	Yes	36	5.0%	0.05006954
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.11543811
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_welfare

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent relate this word to welfare policies?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	623	86.6%	0.86648122
1	Yes	13	1.8%	0.01808067
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.11543811
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_organized

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention ‘organized’ or synonymous words?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	614	85.4%	0.85396384
1	Yes	22	3.1%	0.03059805
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.11543811
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_criminal

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention ‘criminal’ or other criminal activities?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	556	77.3%	0.7732962
1	Yes	80	11.1%	0.1112656
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.1154381
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_gypsy

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention the word ‘gypsy’ or ‘sigøyner’?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	492	68.4%	0.6842837
1	Yes	144	20.0%	0.2002782
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.1154381
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_violence

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention violence?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	631	87.8%	0.877607789
1	Yes	5	0.7%	0.006954103
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.115438108
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_noaffiliation

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention affiliation-issue or similar?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	617	85.8%	0.85813630
1	Yes	19	2.6%	0.02642559
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.11543811
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_mafiafamily

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention family or similar words describing a network or Mafia-tendencies?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	630	87.6%	0.876216968
1	Yes	6	0.8%	0.008344924
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.115438108
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_travelers

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention ‘traveling’ or synonymous words?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	546	75.9%	0.7593880
1	Yes	90	12.5%	0.1251739
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.1154381
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_free

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention ‘freedom’ or synonymous words?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	633	88.0%	0.880389430
1	Yes	3	0.4%	0.004172462
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.115438108
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom1b_LL_dirty

Variable label:	Roma people: Does the respondent mention ‘dirty’ or synonymous words?
Literal question:	What do you think about when you hear the words “Roma people”?
Technical description:	Write as much or as little as you wish. We are grateful for all types of answer. [Asked if u=4 and ran6=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	No	611	85.0%	0.84979138
1	Yes	25	3.5%	0.03477051
97	No answer	83	11.5%	0.11543811
98	Not asked	4732		NA

r5rom2_1

Variable label:	Statement: Roma people are particularly gifted artistically
Pre-question text:	Below is a list of statements that have been made about Roma people. As you see it, how true or untrue are these statement?
Literal question:	Roma people are particularly gifted artistically
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Extremely true	3	0.2%	0.002115656
2	Largely true	71	5.0%	0.050070522
3	Somewhat true	286	20.2%	0.201692525
4	Hardly true at all	197	13.9%	0.138928068
5	Completely untrue	92	6.5%	0.064880113
6	Impossible to answer	719	50.7%	0.507052186
97	No answer	50	3.5%	0.035260931
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5rom2_2

Variable label:	Statement: Roma people do not want to work
Pre-question text:	Below is a list of statements that have been made about Roma people. As you see it, how true or untrue are these statement?
Literal question:	Roma people do not want to work
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Extremely true	101	7.1%	0.07122708
2	Largely true	192	13.5%	0.13540197
3	Somewhat true	328	23.1%	0.23131171
4	Hardly true at all	251	17.7%	0.17700987
5	Completely untrue	120	8.5%	0.08462623
6	Impossible to answer	378	26.7%	0.26657264
97	No answer	48	3.4%	0.03385049
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5rom2_3

Variable label:	Statement: Roma people are criminals
Pre-question text:	Below is a list of statements that have been made about Roma people. As you see it, how true or untrue are these statement?
Literal question:	Roma people are criminals
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Extremely true	60	4.2%	0.04231312
2	Largely true	126	8.9%	0.08885755
3	Somewhat true	499	35.2%	0.35190409
4	Hardly true at all	279	19.7%	0.19675599
5	Completely untrue	64	4.5%	0.04513399
6	Impossible to answer	340	24.0%	0.23977433
97	No answer	50	3.5%	0.03526093
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5rom2_4

Variable label:	Statement: Roma people love their families
Pre-question text:	Below is a list of statements that have been made about Roma people. As you see it, how true or untrue are these statement?
Literal question:	Roma people love their families
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Extremely true	124	8.7%	0.08744711
2	Largely true	506	35.7%	0.35684062
3	Somewhat true	248	17.5%	0.17489422
4	Hardly true at all	45	3.2%	0.03173484
5	Completely untrue	20	1.4%	0.01410437
6	Impossible to answer	429	30.3%	0.30253879
97	No answer	46	3.2%	0.03244006
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5rom2_5

Variable label:	Statement: Roma people are honest
Pre-question text:	Below is a list of statements that have been made about Roma people. As you see it, how true or untrue are these statement?
Literal question:	Roma people are honest
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Extremely true	8	0.6%	0.005641749
2	Largely true	83	5.9%	0.058533145
3	Somewhat true	285	20.1%	0.200987306
4	Hardly true at all	319	22.5%	0.224964739
5	Completely untrue	166	11.7%	0.117066291
6	Impossible to answer	510	36.0%	0.359661495
97	No answer	47	3.3%	0.033145275
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5rom2_6

Variable label:	Statement: Roma people have always created problems in the country they live in
Pre-question text:	Below is a list of statements that have been made about Roma people. As you see it, how true or untrue are these statement?
Literal question:	Roma people have always created problems in the country they live in
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Extremely true	64	4.5%	0.04513399
2	Largely true	154	10.9%	0.10860367
3	Somewhat true	359	25.3%	0.25317348
4	Hardly true at all	271	19.1%	0.19111425
5	Completely untrue	97	6.8%	0.06840621
6	Impossible to answer	429	30.3%	0.30253879
97	No answer	44	3.1%	0.03102962
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5ran7

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1408] [Invalid:4043] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	370	26.3%	0.2627841
2	2	352	25.0%	0.2500000
3	3	338	24.0%	0.2400568
4	4	348	24.7%	0.2471591
Sysmiss		4043		NA

r5rom3a_1

Variable label:	Like/dislike Spanish people: becoming your neighbours
Pre-question text:	To what extent would you like or dislike Spanish people
Literal question:	…becoming your neighbours
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran7=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very much dislike	3	0.8%	0.008108108
2	Dislike	3	0.8%	0.008108108
3	Dislike a little	5	1.4%	0.013513514
4	Neither like nor dislike	154	41.6%	0.416216216
5	Like a little	37	10.0%	0.100000000
6	Like	138	37.3%	0.372972973
7	Very much like	29	7.8%	0.078378378
97	No answer	1	0.3%	0.002702703
98	Not asked	5081		NA

r5rom3a_2

Variable label:	Like/dislike Spanish people: coming to Norway as immigrants
Pre-question text:	To what extent would you like or dislike Spanish people
Literal question:	…coming to Norway as immigrants
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran7=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very much dislike	4	1.1%	0.010810811
2	Dislike	10	2.7%	0.027027027
3	Dislike a little	20	5.4%	0.054054054
4	Neither like nor dislike	157	42.4%	0.424324324
5	Like a little	44	11.9%	0.118918919
6	Like	111	30.0%	0.300000000
7	Very much like	23	6.2%	0.062162162
97	No answer	1	0.3%	0.002702703
98	Not asked	5081		NA

r5rom3a_3

Variable label:	Like/dislike Spanish people: becoming part of your family
Pre-question text:	To what extent would you like or dislike Spanish people
Literal question:	…becoming part of your family
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran7=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very much dislike	6	1.6%	0.016216216
2	Dislike	4	1.1%	0.010810811
3	Dislike a little	23	6.2%	0.062162162
4	Neither like nor dislike	159	43.0%	0.429729730
5	Like a little	37	10.0%	0.100000000
6	Like	110	29.7%	0.297297297
7	Very much like	29	7.8%	0.078378378
97	No answer	2	0.5%	0.005405405
98	Not asked	5081		NA

r5rom3b_1

Variable label:	Like/dislike Roma people: becoming your neighbours
Pre-question text:	To what extent would you like or dislike Roma people
Literal question:	…becoming your neighbours
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran7=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very much dislike	51	14.5%	0.144886364
2	Dislike	61	17.3%	0.173295455
3	Dislike a little	68	19.3%	0.193181818
4	Neither like nor dislike	140	39.8%	0.397727273
5	Like a little	9	2.6%	0.025568182
6	Like	14	4.0%	0.039772727
7	Very much like	1	0.3%	0.002840909
97	No answer	8	2.3%	0.022727273
98	Not asked	5099		NA

r5rom3b_2

Variable label:	Like/dislike Roma people: coming to Norway as immigrants
Pre-question text:	To what extent would you like or dislike Roma people
Literal question:	…coming to Norway as immigrants
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran7=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very much dislike	32	9.1%	0.090909091
2	Dislike	50	14.2%	0.142045455
3	Dislike a little	74	21.0%	0.210227273
4	Neither like nor dislike	155	44.0%	0.440340909
5	Like a little	15	4.3%	0.042613636
6	Like	14	4.0%	0.039772727
7	Very much like	1	0.3%	0.002840909
97	No answer	11	3.1%	0.031250000
98	Not asked	5099		NA

r5rom3b_3

Variable label:	Like/dislike Roma people: becoming part of your family
Pre-question text:	To what extent would you like or dislike Roma people
Literal question:	…becoming part of your family
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran7=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very much dislike	58	16.5%	0.164772727
2	Dislike	67	19.0%	0.190340909
3	Dislike a little	55	15.6%	0.156250000
4	Neither like nor dislike	128	36.4%	0.363636364
5	Like a little	12	3.4%	0.034090909
6	Like	20	5.7%	0.056818182
7	Very much like	2	0.6%	0.005681818
97	No answer	10	2.8%	0.028409091
98	Not asked	5099		NA

r5rom3c_1

Variable label:	Like/dislike Polish people: becoming your neighbours
Pre-question text:	To what extent would you like or dislike Polish people
Literal question:	…becoming your neighbours
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran7=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very much dislike	5	1.5%	0.01479290
2	Dislike	4	1.2%	0.01183432
3	Dislike a little	21	6.2%	0.06213018
4	Neither like nor dislike	198	58.6%	0.58579882
5	Like a little	21	6.2%	0.06213018
6	Like	79	23.4%	0.23372781
7	Very much like	7	2.1%	0.02071006
97	No answer	3	0.9%	0.00887574
98	Not asked	5113		NA

r5rom3c_2

Variable label:	Like/dislike Polish people: coming to Norway as immigrants
Pre-question text:	To what extent would you like or dislike Polish people
Literal question:	…coming to Norway as immigrants
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran7=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very much dislike	1	0.3%	0.00295858
2	Dislike	13	3.8%	0.03846154
3	Dislike a little	35	10.4%	0.10355030
4	Neither like nor dislike	171	50.6%	0.50591716
5	Like a little	38	11.2%	0.11242604
6	Like	68	20.1%	0.20118343
7	Very much like	7	2.1%	0.02071006
97	No answer	5	1.5%	0.01479290
98	Not asked	5113		NA

r5rom3c_3

Variable label:	Like/dislike Polish people: becoming part of your family
Pre-question text:	To what extent would you like or dislike Polish people
Literal question:	…becoming part of your family
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran7=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very much dislike	7	2.1%	0.02071006
2	Dislike	18	5.3%	0.05325444
3	Dislike a little	28	8.3%	0.08284024
4	Neither like nor dislike	184	54.4%	0.54437870
5	Like a little	26	7.7%	0.07692308
6	Like	63	18.6%	0.18639053
7	Very much like	7	2.1%	0.02071006
97	No answer	5	1.5%	0.01479290
98	Not asked	5113		NA

r5rom3d_1

Variable label:	Like/dislike Muslims: becoming your neighbours
Pre-question text:	To what extent would you like or dislike Muslims
Literal question:	…becoming your neighbours
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran7=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very much dislike	18	5.2%	0.051724138
2	Dislike	20	5.7%	0.057471264
3	Dislike a little	39	11.2%	0.112068966
4	Neither like nor dislike	213	61.2%	0.612068966
5	Like a little	15	4.3%	0.043103448
6	Like	36	10.3%	0.103448276
7	Very much like	6	1.7%	0.017241379
97	No answer	1	0.3%	0.002873563
98	Not asked	5103		NA

r5rom3d_2

Variable label:	Like/dislike Muslims: coming to Norway as immigrants
Pre-question text:	To what extent would you like or dislike Muslims
Literal question:	…coming to Norway as immigrants
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran7=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very much dislike	19	5.5%	0.054597701
2	Dislike	31	8.9%	0.089080460
3	Dislike a little	64	18.4%	0.183908046
4	Neither like nor dislike	173	49.7%	0.497126437
5	Like a little	26	7.5%	0.074712644
6	Like	31	8.9%	0.089080460
7	Very much like	3	0.9%	0.008620690
97	No answer	1	0.3%	0.002873563
98	Not asked	5103		NA

r5rom3d_3

Variable label:	Like/dislike Muslims: becoming part of your family
Pre-question text:	To what extent would you like or dislike Muslims
Literal question:	…becoming part of your family
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran7=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very much dislike	43	12.4%	0.123563218
2	Dislike	48	13.8%	0.137931034
3	Dislike a little	49	14.1%	0.140804598
4	Neither like nor dislike	155	44.5%	0.445402299
5	Like a little	14	4.0%	0.040229885
6	Like	28	8.0%	0.080459770
7	Very much like	10	2.9%	0.028735632
97	No answer	1	0.3%	0.002873563
98	Not asked	5103		NA

r5rom4

Variable label:	How widespread do you think negative attitudes to Roma people are in Norway today?
Literal question:	How widespread do you think negative attitudes to Roma people are in Norway today?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very widespread	425	30.0%	0.299717913
2	Widespread	705	49.7%	0.497179126
3	Somewhat widespread	243	17.1%	0.171368124
4	Not very widespread	18	1.3%	0.012693935
5	Not widespread at all	3	0.2%	0.002115656
97	No answer	24	1.7%	0.016925247
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv29_1

Variable label:	Statement: Begging should be prohibited in Norway
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	243	17.1%	0.17136812
2	Agree	297	20.9%	0.20944993
3	Agree somewhat	265	18.7%	0.18688293
4	Neither agree nor disagree	158	11.1%	0.11142454
5	Disagree somewhat	141	9.9%	0.09943583
6	Disagree	204	14.4%	0.14386460
7	Strongly disagree	88	6.2%	0.06205924
97	No answer	22	1.6%	0.01551481
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv29_2

Variable label:	Statement: Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world than to people in this country
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world than to people in this country.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	142	10.0%	0.10014104
2	Agree	255	18.0%	0.17983075
3	Agree somewhat	266	18.8%	0.18758815
4	Neither agree nor disagree	389	27.4%	0.27433004
5	Disagree somewhat	144	10.2%	0.10155148
6	Disagree	161	11.4%	0.11354020
7	Strongly disagree	37	2.6%	0.02609309
97	No answer	24	1.7%	0.01692525
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv29_3

Variable label:	Statement: Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims are allowed to live here
Pre-question text:	Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
Literal question:	Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims are allowed to live here.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	163	11.5%	0.11495063
2	Agree	184	13.0%	0.12976023
3	Agree somewhat	271	19.1%	0.19111425
4	Neither agree nor disagree	199	14.0%	0.14033850
5	Disagree somewhat	174	12.3%	0.12270804
6	Disagree	260	18.3%	0.18335684
7	Strongly disagree	144	10.2%	0.10155148
97	No answer	23	1.6%	0.01622003
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5pad2_dv

Variable label:	Agree-disagree: Norway should take in more Syrian refugees than agreed
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next three years than has been agreed?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	188	13.3%	0.13258110
2	Agree	337	23.8%	0.23765867
3	Agree somewhat	271	19.1%	0.19111425
4	Neither agree nor disagree	134	9.4%	0.09449929
5	Disagree somewhat	145	10.2%	0.10225670
6	Disagree	150	10.6%	0.10578279
7	Strongly disagree	164	11.6%	0.11565585
97	No answer	29	2.0%	0.02045134
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5ran8

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1404] [Invalid:4047] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	251	17.9%	0.1787749
2	2	214	15.2%	0.1524217
3	3	208	14.8%	0.1481481
4	4	264	18.8%	0.1880342
5	5	258	18.4%	0.1837607
6	6	209	14.9%	0.1488604
Sysmiss		4047		NA

r5dv8a

Variable label:	Anti-Islamic group wants to meet politician
Literal question:	Imagine that a representative of an anti-Islamic group wishes to meet an established politician for a TV debate on NRK. Some people believe that the established politician should attend. Others believe that the established politician should not attend because it is wrong to draw attention to such a group. What about you? Do you think…
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran8=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strongly that the politician should attend	48	19.1%	0.19123506
2	Strongly that the politician should attend	65	25.9%	0.25896414
3	Somewhat strongly that the politician should attend	61	24.3%	0.24302789
4	Neither one way nor the other	34	13.5%	0.13545817
5	Somewhat strongly that the politician should not attend	18	7.2%	0.07171315
6	Strongly that the politician should not attend	10	4.0%	0.03984064
7	Very Strongly that the politician should not attend	10	4.0%	0.03984064
97	No answer	5	2.0%	0.01992032
98	Not asked	5200		NA

r5dv8b

Variable label:	Anti-Islamic group wants to meet a politician, a politician has agreed
Literal question:	Imagine that a representative of an anti-Islamic group wishes to meet an established politician for a TV debate on NRK. The established politician has agreed to attend. Others believe that the established politician should not attend because it is wrong to draw attention to such a group. What about you? Do you think…
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran8=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strongly that the politician should attend	27	12.6%	0.126168224
2	Strongly that the politician should attend	65	30.4%	0.303738318
3	Somewhat strongly that the politician should attend	46	21.5%	0.214953271
4	Neither one way nor the other	58	27.1%	0.271028037
5	Somewhat strongly that the politician should not attend	8	3.7%	0.037383178
6	Strongly that the politician should not attend	3	1.4%	0.014018692
7	Very strongly that the politician should not attend	6	2.8%	0.028037383
97	No answer	1	0.5%	0.004672897
98	Not asked	5237		NA

r5dv8c

Variable label:	Extreme right wing group wants to meet politician
Literal question:	Imagine that a representative of an extreme right wing group wishes to meet an established politician for a TV debate on NRK. Some people believe that the established politician should attend. Others believe that the established politician should not attend because it is wrong to draw attention to such a group. What about you? Do you think…
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran8=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strongly that the politician should attend	27	13.0%	0.12980769
2	Strongly that the politician should attend	61	29.3%	0.29326923
3	Somewhat strongly that the politician should attend	47	22.6%	0.22596154
4	Neither one way nor the other	30	14.4%	0.14423077
5	Somewhat strongly that the politician should not attend	13	6.2%	0.06250000
6	Strongly that the politician should not attend	15	7.2%	0.07211538
7	Very strongly that the politician should not attend	11	5.3%	0.05288462
97	No answer	4	1.9%	0.01923077
98	Not asked	5243		NA

r5dv8d

Variable label:	Extreme right wing group wants to meet politician, a politician has agreed
Literal question:	Imagine that a representative of an extreme right wing group wishes to meet an established politician for a TV debate on NRK. The established politician has agreed to attend. Others believe that the established politician should not attend because it is wrong to draw attention to such a group. What about you? Do you think…
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran8=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strongly that the politician should attend	38	14.4%	0.14393939
2	Strongly that the politician should attend	64	24.2%	0.24242424
3	Somewhat strongly that the politician should attend	56	21.2%	0.21212121
4	Neither one way nor the other	54	20.5%	0.20454545
5	Somewhat strongly that the politician should not attend	18	6.8%	0.06818182
6	Strongly that the politician should not attend	13	4.9%	0.04924242
7	Very strongly that the politician should not attend	16	6.1%	0.06060606
97	No answer	5	1.9%	0.01893939
98	Not asked	5187		NA

r5dv8e

Variable label:	Muslim fundamentalist group wants to meet politician
Literal question:	Imagine that a representative of a Muslim fundamentalist group wishes to meet an established politician for a TV debate on NRK. Some people believe that the established politician should attend. Others believe that the established politician should not attend because it is wrong to draw attention to such a group. What about you? Do you think…
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran8=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strongly that the politician should attend	35	13.6%	0.13565891
2	Strongly that the politician should attend	52	20.2%	0.20155039
3	Somewhat strongly that the politician should attend	55	21.3%	0.21317829
4	Neither one way nor the other	59	22.9%	0.22868217
5	Somewhat strongly that the politician should not attend	22	8.5%	0.08527132
6	Strongly that the politician should not attend	16	6.2%	0.06201550
7	Very strongly that the politician should not attend	15	5.8%	0.05813953
97	No answer	4	1.6%	0.01550388
98	Not asked	5193		NA

r5dv8f

Variable label:	Muslim fundamentalist group wants to meet politician, a politician has agreed
Literal question:	Imagine that a representative of a Muslim fundamentalist group wishes to meet an established politician for a TV debate on NRK. The established politician has agreed to attend. Others believe that the established politician should not attend because it is wrong to draw attention to such a group. What about you? Do you think…
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran8=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strongly that the politician should attend	35	16.7%	0.16746411
2	Strongly that the politician should attend	55	26.3%	0.26315789
3	Somewhat strongly that the politician should attend	43	20.6%	0.20574163
4	Neither one way nor the other	34	16.3%	0.16267943
5	Somewhat strongly that the politician should not attend	13	6.2%	0.06220096
6	Strongly that the politician should not attend	10	4.8%	0.04784689
7	Very strongly that the politician should not attend	13	6.2%	0.06220096
97	No answer	6	2.9%	0.02870813
98	Not asked	5242		NA

r5ran9

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1403] [Invalid:4048] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	256	18.2%	0.1824661
2	2	231	16.5%	0.1646472
3	3	266	19.0%	0.1895937
4	4	231	16.5%	0.1646472
5	5	216	15.4%	0.1539558
6	6	203	14.5%	0.1446900
Sysmiss		4048		NA

r5dv9a

Variable label:	Allow demonstration: PEGIDA Norway
Pre-question text:	The group PEGIDA Norway wishes to demonstrate from time to time. Some people believe that PEGIDA Norway should not be allowed to demonstrate because they spread hatred against Muslims. Others believe that they should be allowed because freedom of speech is important.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be allowed to demonstrate?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran9=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	24	9.4%	0.0937500
2	Agree	55	21.5%	0.2148438
3	Agree somewhat	71	27.7%	0.2773438
4	Neither agree nor disagree	47	18.4%	0.1835938
5	Disagree somewhat	18	7.0%	0.0703125
6	Disagree	27	10.5%	0.1054688
7	Strongly disagree	6	2.3%	0.0234375
97	No answer	8	3.1%	0.0312500
98	Not asked	5195		NA

r5dv9b

Variable label:	Allow demonstration: PEGIDA Norway, 4500 followers on Facebook
Pre-question text:	The group PEGIDA Norway wishes to demonstrate from time to time. They have 4,500 followers on Facebook. Some people believe that PEGIDA Norway should not be allowed to demonstrate because they spread hatred against Muslims. Others believe that they should be allowed because freedom of speech is important.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be allowed to demonstrate?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran9=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	33	14.3%	0.142857143
2	Agree	50	21.6%	0.216450216
3	Agree somewhat	47	20.3%	0.203463203
4	Neither agree nor disagree	36	15.6%	0.155844156
5	Disagree somewhat	27	11.7%	0.116883117
6	Disagree	18	7.8%	0.077922078
7	Strongly disagree	18	7.8%	0.077922078
97	No answer	2	0.9%	0.008658009
98	Not asked	5220		NA

r5dv9c

Variable label:	Allow demonstration: PEGIDA Norway, close international ties
Pre-question text:	The group PEGIDA Norway wishes to demonstrate from time to time. PEGIDA Norway is part of an international PEGIDA network that has close ties. Some people believe that PEGIDA Norway should not be allowed to demonstrate because they spread hatred against Muslims. Others believe that they should be allowed because freedom of speech is important.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be allowed to demonstrate?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran9=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	29	10.9%	0.10902256
2	Agree	69	25.9%	0.25939850
3	Agree somewhat	60	22.6%	0.22556391
4	Neither agree nor disagree	40	15.0%	0.15037594
5	Disagree somewhat	28	10.5%	0.10526316
6	Disagree	26	9.8%	0.09774436
7	Strongly disagree	7	2.6%	0.02631579
97	No answer	7	2.6%	0.02631579
98	Not asked	5185		NA

r5dv9d

Variable label:	Allow demonstration: “No to a Mosque in Larvik”
Pre-question text:	The group “No to a mosque in Larvik” wishes to demonstrate from time to time Some people believe that “No to a mosque in Larvik” should not be allowed to demonstrate because they spread hatred against Muslims. Others believe that they should be allowed because freedom of speech is important.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be allowed to demonstrate?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran9=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	43	18.6%	0.186147186
2	Agree	66	28.6%	0.285714286
3	Agree somewhat	53	22.9%	0.229437229
4	Neither agree nor disagree	38	16.5%	0.164502165
5	Disagree somewhat	14	6.1%	0.060606061
6	Disagree	10	4.3%	0.043290043
7	Strongly disagree	2	0.9%	0.008658009
97	No answer	5	2.2%	0.021645022
98	Not asked	5220		NA

r5dv9e

Variable label:	Allow demonstration: “No to a Mosque in Larvik”, 28 followers on Facebook
Pre-question text:	The group “No to a mosque in Larvik” wishes to demonstrate from time to time They have 28 followers on Facebook. Some people believe that “No to a mosque in Larvik” should not be allowed to demonstrate because they spread hatred against Muslims. Others believe that they should be allowed because freedom of speech is important.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be allowed to demonstrate?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran9=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	49	22.7%	0.226851852
2	Agree	74	34.3%	0.342592593
3	Agree somewhat	39	18.1%	0.180555556
4	Neither agree nor disagree	30	13.9%	0.138888889
5	Disagree somewhat	9	4.2%	0.041666667
6	Disagree	9	4.2%	0.041666667
7	Strongly disagree	2	0.9%	0.009259259
97	No answer	4	1.9%	0.018518519
98	Not asked	5235		NA

r5dv9f

Variable label:	Allow demonstration: “No to a Mosque in Larvik”, without close links to others
Pre-question text:	The group “No to a mosque in Larvik” wishes to demonstrate from time to time “No to a mosque in Larvik” is a local group without close links with others. Some people believe that “No to a mosque in Larvik” should not be allowed to demonstrate because they spread hatred against Muslims. Others believe that they should be allowed because freedom of speech is important.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be allowed to demonstrate?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran9=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	42	20.7%	0.206896552
2	Agree	64	31.5%	0.315270936
3	Agree somewhat	44	21.7%	0.216748768
4	Neither agree nor disagree	27	13.3%	0.133004926
5	Disagree somewhat	16	7.9%	0.078817734
6	Disagree	6	3.0%	0.029556650
7	Strongly disagree	3	1.5%	0.014778325
97	No answer	1	0.5%	0.004926108
98	Not asked	5248		NA

r5ran10

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1403] [Invalid:4048] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	343	24.4%	0.2444761
2	2	383	27.3%	0.2729865
3	3	371	26.4%	0.2644334
4	4	306	21.8%	0.2181041
Sysmiss		4048		NA

r5dv10a

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Publish readers’ letters that threaten immigrants in Norway
Literal question:	Newspaper editors sometimes receive letters from readers that threaten immigrants in Norway. To what extent do you agree or disagree that newspaper editors should publish such readers’ letters?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran10=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	10	2.9%	0.02915452
2	Agree	41	12.0%	0.11953353
3	Agree somewhat	50	14.6%	0.14577259
4	Neither agree nor disagree	51	14.9%	0.14868805
5	Disagree somewhat	54	15.7%	0.15743440
6	Disagree	87	25.4%	0.25364431
7	Strongly disagree	44	12.8%	0.12827988
97	No answer	6	1.7%	0.01749271
98	Not asked	5108		NA

r5dv10b

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Publish readers’ letters expressing hatred towards immigrants in Norway
Literal question:	Newspaper editors sometimes receive letters from readers that express hatred towards immigrants in Norway. To what extent do you agree or disagree that newspaper editors should publish such readers’ letters?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran10=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	16	4.2%	0.04177546
2	Agree	45	11.7%	0.11749347
3	Agree somewhat	71	18.5%	0.18537859
4	Neither agree nor disagree	58	15.1%	0.15143603
5	Disagree somewhat	63	16.4%	0.16449086
6	Disagree	92	24.0%	0.24020888
7	Strongly disagree	33	8.6%	0.08616188
97	No answer	5	1.3%	0.01305483
98	Not asked	5068		NA

r5dv10c

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Publish readers’ letters expressing prejudice against immigrants in Norway
Literal question:	Newspaper editors sometimes receive letters from readers that express prejudice towards immigrants in Norway. To what extent do you agree or disagree that newspaper editors should publish such readers’ letters?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran10=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	26	7.0%	0.07008086
2	Agree	93	25.1%	0.25067385
3	Agree somewhat	103	27.8%	0.27762803
4	Neither agree nor disagree	61	16.4%	0.16442049
5	Disagree somewhat	39	10.5%	0.10512129
6	Disagree	29	7.8%	0.07816712
7	Strongly disagree	15	4.0%	0.04043127
97	No answer	5	1.3%	0.01347709
98	Not asked	5080		NA

r5dv10d

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Publish readers’ letters expressing a negative view of immigrants in Norway
Literal question:	Newspaper editors sometimes receive letters from readers that express a negative view towards immigrants in Norway. To what extent do you agree or disagree that newspaper editors should publish such readers’ letters?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran10=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	30	9.8%	0.098039216
2	Agree	97	31.7%	0.316993464
3	Agree somewhat	70	22.9%	0.228758170
4	Neither agree nor disagree	56	18.3%	0.183006536
5	Disagree somewhat	26	8.5%	0.084967320
6	Disagree	15	4.9%	0.049019608
7	Strongly disagree	9	2.9%	0.029411765
97	No answer	3	1.0%	0.009803922
98	Not asked	5145		NA

r5ran11

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1401] [Invalid:4050] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	358	25.6%	0.2555318
2	2	361	25.8%	0.2576731
3	3	338	24.1%	0.2412562
4	4	344	24.6%	0.2455389
Sysmiss		4050		NA

r5dv11a_1

Variable label:	Allow: Politician threatens immigrants in Norway on Facebook
Literal question:	Imagine that a politician in Norway has written something on Facebook that threatens immigrants in Norway. Some people think that parties in Norway should allow a politician who writes such things on Facebook to stand for election, while others think that parties in Norway should not allow this. What about you? Do you think…
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran11=1. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5DV11_2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strongly that parties should allow this	9	2.5%	0.02513966
2	Strongly that parties should allow this	23	6.4%	0.06424581
3	Somewhat strongly that parties should allow this	38	10.6%	0.10614525
4	You have no opinion on this at all	58	16.2%	0.16201117
5	Somewhat strongly that parties should not allow this	75	20.9%	0.20949721
6	Strongly that parties should not allow this	86	24.0%	0.24022346
7	Very strongly that parties should not allow this	64	17.9%	0.17877095
97	No answer	5	1.4%	0.01396648
98	Not asked	5093		NA

r5dv11b_1

Variable label:	Allow: Politician expresses hatred towards immigrants in Norway on Facebook
Literal question:	Imagine that a politician in Norway has written something on Facebook that expresses hatred towards immigrants in Norway. Some people think that parties in Norway should allow a politician who writes such things on Facebook to stand for election, while others think that parties in Norway should not allow this. What about you? Do you think…
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran11=2. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5DV11_2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strongly that parties should allow this	11	3.0%	0.03047091
2	Strongly that parties should allow this	24	6.6%	0.06648199
3	Somewhat strongly that parties should allow this	46	12.7%	0.12742382
4	You have no opinion on this at all	67	18.6%	0.18559557
5	Somewhat strongly that parties should not allow this	71	19.7%	0.19667590
6	Strongly that parties should not allow this	67	18.6%	0.18559557
7	Very strongly that parties should not allow this	64	17.7%	0.17728532
97	No answer	11	3.0%	0.03047091
98	Not asked	5090		NA

r5dv11c_1

Variable label:	Allow: Politician express prejudice against immigrants in Norway on Facebook
Literal question:	Imagine that a politician in Norway has written something on Facebook that expresses prejudice towards immigrants in Norway. Some people think that parties in Norway should allow a politician who writes such things on Facebook to stand for election, while others think that parties in Norway should not allow this. What about you? Do you think…
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran11=3. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5DV11_2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strongly that parties should allow this	17	5.0%	0.05029586
2	Strongly that parties should allow this	37	10.9%	0.10946746
3	Somewhat strongly that parties should allow this	63	18.6%	0.18639053
4	You have no opinion on this at all	66	19.5%	0.19526627
5	Somewhat strongly that parties should not allow this	64	18.9%	0.18934911
6	Strongly that parties should not allow this	52	15.4%	0.15384615
7	Very strongly that parties should not allow this	32	9.5%	0.09467456
97	No answer	7	2.1%	0.02071006
98	Not asked	5113		NA

r5dv11d_1

Variable label:	Allow: Politician expressing a negative view of immigrants in Norway on Facebook
Literal question:	Imagine that a politician in Norway has written something on Facebook that expresses a negative view towards immigrants in Norway. Some people think that parties in Norway should allow a politician who writes such things on Facebook to stand for election, while others think that parties in Norway should not allow this. What about you? Do you think…
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran11=4. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5DV11_2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strongly that parties should allow this	27	7.8%	0.07848837
2	Strongly that parties should allow this	42	12.2%	0.12209302
3	Somewhat strongly that parties should allow this	71	20.6%	0.20639535
4	You have no opinion on this at all	70	20.3%	0.20348837
5	Somewhat strongly that parties should not allow this	54	15.7%	0.15697674
6	Strongly that parties should not allow this	36	10.5%	0.10465116
7	Very strongly that parties should not allow this	31	9.0%	0.09011628
97	No answer	13	3.8%	0.03779070
98	Not asked	5107		NA

r5dv11_2

Variable label:	Allow: Likely to vote for candidates who write such on Facebook
Literal question:	How likely is it that you might vote at some time for candidates who have written such things on Facebook?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5DV11A_1 to R5DV11D_1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very likely	29	2.0%	0.02045134
2	Likely	55	3.9%	0.03878702
3	Fairly likely	63	4.4%	0.04442877
4	Neither likely nor unlikely	234	16.5%	0.16502116
5	Fairly unlikely	99	7.0%	0.06981664
6	Unlikely	272	19.2%	0.19181946
7	Very unlikely	616	43.4%	0.43441467
97	No answer	50	3.5%	0.03526093
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5ran12

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1395] [Invalid:4056] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	344	24.7%	0.2465950
2	2	341	24.4%	0.2444444
3	3	346	24.8%	0.2480287
4	4	364	26.1%	0.2609319
Sysmiss		4056		NA

r5dv12a

Variable label:	Allow posters that are: critical of Islam
Literal question:	Some organisations in Norway wish to hang up posters in public places that are critical of Islam. Some people are against allowing such posters in public places, others are in favour of allowing them because freedom of speech is so important. We would like to know what you think about allowing such posters. Are you..
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran12=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly in favour of allowing them	14	4.1%	0.04069767
2	In favour of allowing them	41	11.9%	0.11918605
3	Somewhat in favour of allowing them	56	16.3%	0.16279070
4	Neither for nor against	66	19.2%	0.19186047
5	Somewhat against allowing them	58	16.9%	0.16860465
6	Against allowing them	74	21.5%	0.21511628
7	Strongly against allowing them	30	8.7%	0.08720930
97	No answer	5	1.5%	0.01453488
98	Not asked	5107		NA

r5dv12b

Variable label:	Allow posters that are: offensive to Muslims
Literal question:	Some organisations in Norway wish to hang up posters in public places that could be offensive to Muslims. Some people are against allowing such posters in public places, others are in favour of allowing them because freedom of speech is so important. We would like to know what you think about allowing such posters. Are you..
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran12=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly in favour of allowing them	25	7.3%	0.073313783
2	In favour of allowing them	54	15.8%	0.158357771
3	Somewhat in favour of allowing them	41	12.0%	0.120234604
4	Neither for nor against	58	17.0%	0.170087977
5	Somewhat against allowing them	52	15.2%	0.152492669
6	Against allowing them	67	19.6%	0.196480938
7	Strongly against allowing them	41	12.0%	0.120234604
97	No answer	3	0.9%	0.008797654
98	Not asked	5110		NA

r5dv12c

Variable label:	Allow posters that: expresses hatred towards Muslims in Norway
Literal question:	Some organisations in Norway wish to hang up posters in public places that express hatred towards to Muslims in Norway. Some people are against allowing such posters in public places, others are in favour of allowing them because freedom of speech is so important. We would like to know what you think about allowing such posters. Are you..
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran12=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly in favour of allowing them	6	1.7%	0.01734104
2	In favour of allowing them	10	2.9%	0.02890173
3	Somewhat in favour of allowing them	17	4.9%	0.04913295
4	Neither for nor against	46	13.3%	0.13294798
5	Somewhat against allowing them	55	15.9%	0.15895954
6	Against allowing them	95	27.5%	0.27456647
7	Strongly against allowing them	111	32.1%	0.32080925
97	No answer	6	1.7%	0.01734104
98	Not asked	5105		NA

r5dv12d

Variable label:	Allow posters that: threaten Muslims in Norway
Literal question:	Some organisations in Norway wish to hang up posters in public places that threaten Muslims in Norway. Some people are against allowing such posters in public places, others are in favour of allowing them because freedom of speech is so important. We would like to know what you think about allowing such posters. Are you..
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran12=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly in favour of allowing them	3	0.8%	0.008241758
2	In favour of allowing them	12	3.3%	0.032967033
3	Somewhat in favour of allowing them	14	3.8%	0.038461538
4	Neither for nor against	31	8.5%	0.085164835
5	Somewhat against allowing them	49	13.5%	0.134615385
6	Against allowing them	120	33.0%	0.329670330
7	Strongly against allowing them	131	36.0%	0.359890110
97	No answer	4	1.1%	0.010989011
98	Not asked	5087		NA

r5ran13

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1394] [Invalid:4057] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	219	15.7%	0.1571019
2	2	235	16.9%	0.1685796
3	3	273	19.6%	0.1958393
4	4	232	16.6%	0.1664275
5	5	220	15.8%	0.1578192
6	6	215	15.4%	0.1542324
Sysmiss		4057		NA

r5dv14a

Variable label:	Should newspapers in Norway be allowed to publish letters that are intensely critical about immigrants?
Literal question:	Should newspapers in Norway be allowed to publish letters that are intensely critical about immigrants?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran13=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to publish	149	68.0%	0.68036530
2	Should not be allowed to publish	66	30.1%	0.30136986
97	No answer	4	1.8%	0.01826484
98	Not asked	5232		NA

r5dv14b

Variable label:	Should newspapers in Norway be allowed to publish letters that are intensely critical about immigrants on unreasonable grounds?
Literal question:	Should newspapers in Norway be allowed to publish letters that are intensely critical about immigrants on unreasonable grounds?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran13=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to publish	93	39.6%	0.39574468
2	Should not be allowed to publish	136	57.9%	0.57872340
97	No answer	6	2.6%	0.02553191
98	Not asked	5216		NA

r5dv14c

Variable label:	Should newspapers in Norway be allowed to publish letters that are intensely critical about immigrants on inaccurate grounds?
Literal question:	Should newspapers in Norway be allowed to publish letters that are intensely critical about immigrants on inaccurate grounds?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran13=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should be allowed to publish	94	34.4%	0.34432234
2	Should not be allowed to publish	174	63.7%	0.63736264
97	No answer	5	1.8%	0.01831502
98	Not asked	5178		NA

r5dv14d

Variable label:	Should newspapers in Norway publish letters that are intensely critical about immigrants?
Literal question:	Should newspapers in Norway publish letters that are intensely critical about immigrants?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran13=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should publish	125	53.9%	0.5387931
2	Should not publish	98	42.2%	0.4224138
97	No answer	9	3.9%	0.0387931
98	Not asked	5219		NA

r5dv14e

Variable label:	Should newspapers in Norway publish letters that are intensely critical about immigrants on unreasonable grounds?
Literal question:	Should newspapers in Norway publish letters that are intensely critical about immigrants on unreasonable grounds?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran13=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should publish	39	17.7%	0.17727273
2	Should not publish	177	80.5%	0.80454545
97	No answer	4	1.8%	0.01818182
98	Not asked	5231		NA

r5dv14f

Variable label:	Should newspapers in Norway publish letters that are intensely critical about immigrants on inaccurate grounds?
Literal question:	Should newspapers in Norway publish letters that are intensely critical about immigrants on inaccurate grounds?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran13=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Should publish	42	19.5%	0.195348837
2	Should not publish	171	79.5%	0.795348837
97	No answer	2	0.9%	0.009302326
98	Not asked	5236		NA

r5dv15

Variable label:	How strong are your views about this matter
Literal question:	How strong are your views about this matter:
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Very strong	141	9.9%	0.09943583
2	Strong	527	37.2%	0.37165021
3	Fairly strong	533	37.6%	0.37588152
4	Not strong	157	11.1%	0.11071932
97	No answer	60	4.2%	0.04231312
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5ran14

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1394] [Invalid:4057] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	243	17.4%	0.1743185
2	2	236	16.9%	0.1692970
3	3	222	15.9%	0.1592539
4	4	240	17.2%	0.1721664
5	5	238	17.1%	0.1707317
6	6	215	15.4%	0.1542324
Sysmiss		4057		NA

r5dv16a

Variable label:	Publish cartoons that: Pokes fun of Muslims and their religious values
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that newspapers should publish cartoons that poke fun at Muslims and their religious values?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran14=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	15	6.2%	0.061728395
2	Agree	39	16.0%	0.160493827
3	Agree somewhat	36	14.8%	0.148148148
4	Neither agree nor disagree	45	18.5%	0.185185185
5	Disagree somewhat	34	14.0%	0.139917695
6	Disagree	41	16.9%	0.168724280
7	Strongly disagree	31	12.8%	0.127572016
97	No answer	2	0.8%	0.008230453
98	Not asked	5208		NA

r5dv16b

Variable label:	Publish cartoons that: Pokes fun of traditional religious values
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that newspapers should publish cartoons that poke fun at traditional religious values?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran14=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	24	10.2%	0.101694915
2	Agree	44	18.6%	0.186440678
3	Agree somewhat	32	13.6%	0.135593220
4	Neither agree nor disagree	34	14.4%	0.144067797
5	Disagree somewhat	34	14.4%	0.144067797
6	Disagree	41	17.4%	0.173728814
7	Strongly disagree	26	11.0%	0.110169492
97	No answer	1	0.4%	0.004237288
98	Not asked	5215		NA

r5dv16c

Variable label:	Publish cartoons that: Ridicule Muslims and their religious values
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that newspapers should publish cartoons that ridicule Muslims and their religious values?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran14=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	24	10.8%	0.10810811
2	Agree	23	10.4%	0.10360360
3	Agree somewhat	34	15.3%	0.15315315
4	Neither agree nor disagree	38	17.1%	0.17117117
5	Disagree somewhat	27	12.2%	0.12162162
6	Disagree	34	15.3%	0.15315315
7	Strongly disagree	38	17.1%	0.17117117
97	No answer	4	1.8%	0.01801802
98	Not asked	5229		NA

r5dv16d

Variable label:	Publish cartoons that: Ridicules traditional religious values
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that newspapers should publish cartoons that ridicule traditional religious values?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran14=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	20	8.3%	0.083333333
2	Agree	45	18.8%	0.187500000
3	Agree somewhat	42	17.5%	0.175000000
4	Neither agree nor disagree	36	15.0%	0.150000000
5	Disagree somewhat	27	11.2%	0.112500000
6	Disagree	38	15.8%	0.158333333
7	Strongly disagree	30	12.5%	0.125000000
97	No answer	2	0.8%	0.008333333
98	Not asked	5211		NA

r5dv16e

Variable label:	Publish cartoons that: Show contempt toward Muslims and their religious values
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that newspapers should publish cartoons that show contempt for Muslims and their religious values?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran14=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	23	9.7%	0.09663866
2	Agree	34	14.3%	0.14285714
3	Agree somewhat	35	14.7%	0.14705882
4	Neither agree nor disagree	40	16.8%	0.16806723
5	Disagree somewhat	34	14.3%	0.14285714
6	Disagree	39	16.4%	0.16386555
7	Strongly disagree	28	11.8%	0.11764706
97	No answer	5	2.1%	0.02100840
98	Not asked	5213		NA

r5dv16f

Variable label:	Publish cartoons that: Show contempt towards traditional religious values
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that newspapers should publish cartoons that show contempt for traditional religious values?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran14=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	21	9.8%	0.097674419
2	Agree	29	13.5%	0.134883721
3	Agree somewhat	24	11.2%	0.111627907
4	Neither agree nor disagree	33	15.3%	0.153488372
5	Disagree somewhat	30	14.0%	0.139534884
6	Disagree	47	21.9%	0.218604651
7	Strongly disagree	29	13.5%	0.134883721
97	No answer	2	0.9%	0.009302326
98	Not asked	5236		NA

r5ran15

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1394] [Invalid:4057] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	152	10.9%	0.1090387
2	2	164	11.8%	0.1176471
3	3	153	11.0%	0.1097561
4	4	181	13.0%	0.1298422
5	5	194	13.9%	0.1391679
6	6	182	13.1%	0.1305595
7	7	183	13.1%	0.1312769
8	8	185	13.3%	0.1327116
Sysmiss		4057		NA

r5dv17a

Variable label:	Support/oppose: Some women choose to quit their job when they have children in order to get more time with the kids
Literal question:	Some women choose to stop working when they have children, so as to have more time with the children. To what extent are you in support of or opposed to this?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran15=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Support a lot	25	16.4%	0.164473684
2	Support	32	21.1%	0.210526316
3	Support somewhat	25	16.4%	0.164473684
4	Neither support nor oppose	46	30.3%	0.302631579
5	Oppose somewhat	9	5.9%	0.059210526
6	Oppose	8	5.3%	0.052631579
7	Oppose a lot	6	3.9%	0.039473684
97	No answer	1	0.7%	0.006578947
98	Not asked	5299		NA

r5dv17b

Variable label:	Support/oppose: Some women choose to stop working when they have children, because the family wishes this
Literal question:	Some women choose to stop working when they have children, because the family wishes this. To what extent are you in support of or opposed to this?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran15=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Support a lot	5	3.0%	0.03048780
2	Support	23	14.0%	0.14024390
3	Support somewhat	12	7.3%	0.07317073
4	Neither support nor oppose	57	34.8%	0.34756098
5	Oppose somewhat	19	11.6%	0.11585366
6	Oppose	31	18.9%	0.18902439
7	Oppose a lot	15	9.1%	0.09146341
97	No answer	2	1.2%	0.01219512
98	Not asked	5287		NA

r5dv17c

Variable label:	Support/oppose: Some women stop working when they have children, so as to have more time with the children
Literal question:	Some women stop working when they have children, so as to have more time with the children. To what extent are you in support of or opposed to this?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran15=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Support a lot	15	9.8%	0.098039216
2	Support	45	29.4%	0.294117647
3	Support somewhat	28	18.3%	0.183006536
4	Neither support nor oppose	46	30.1%	0.300653595
5	Oppose somewhat	6	3.9%	0.039215686
6	Oppose	9	5.9%	0.058823529
7	Oppose a lot	3	2.0%	0.019607843
97	No answer	1	0.7%	0.006535948
98	Not asked	5298		NA

r5dv17d

Variable label:	Support/oppose: Some women stop working when they have children, because the family wishes this
Literal question:	Some women stop working when they have children, because the family wishes this. To what extent are you in support of or opposed to this?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran15=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Support a lot	3	1.7%	0.01657459
2	Support	19	10.5%	0.10497238
3	Support somewhat	15	8.3%	0.08287293
4	Neither support nor oppose	49	27.1%	0.27071823
5	Oppose somewhat	27	14.9%	0.14917127
6	Oppose	40	22.1%	0.22099448
7	Oppose a lot	22	12.2%	0.12154696
97	No answer	6	3.3%	0.03314917
98	Not asked	5270		NA

r5dv17e

Variable label:	Support/oppose: Some Muslim women choose to stop working when they have children, so as to have more time with the children
Literal question:	Some Muslim women choose to stop working when they have children, so as to have more time with the children. To what extent are you in support of or opposed to this?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran15=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Support a lot	6	3.1%	0.03092784
2	Support	32	16.5%	0.16494845
3	Support somewhat	23	11.9%	0.11855670
4	Neither support nor oppose	83	42.8%	0.42783505
5	Oppose somewhat	28	14.4%	0.14432990
6	Oppose	11	5.7%	0.05670103
7	Oppose a lot	8	4.1%	0.04123711
97	No answer	3	1.5%	0.01546392
98	Not asked	5257		NA

r5dv17f

Variable label:	Support/oppose: Some Muslim women choose to stop working when they have children, because the family wishes this
Literal question:	Some Muslim women choose to stop working when they have children, because the family wishes this. To what extent are you in support of or opposed to this?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran15=6]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Support a lot	0	0.0%	0.00000000
2	Support	2	1.1%	0.01098901
3	Support somewhat	7	3.8%	0.03846154
4	Neither support nor oppose	73	40.1%	0.40109890
5	Oppose somewhat	38	20.9%	0.20879121
6	Oppose	35	19.2%	0.19230769
7	Oppose a lot	24	13.2%	0.13186813
97	No answer	3	1.6%	0.01648352
98	Not asked	5269		NA

r5dv17g

Variable label:	Support/oppose: Some Muslim women stop working when they have children, so as to have more time with the children
Literal question:	Some Muslim women stop working when they have children, so as to have more time with the children. To what extent are you in support of or opposed to this?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran15=7]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Support a lot	6	3.3%	0.03278689
2	Support	26	14.2%	0.14207650
3	Support somewhat	27	14.8%	0.14754098
4	Neither support nor oppose	84	45.9%	0.45901639
5	Oppose somewhat	19	10.4%	0.10382514
6	Oppose	13	7.1%	0.07103825
7	Oppose a lot	6	3.3%	0.03278689
97	No answer	2	1.1%	0.01092896
98	Not asked	5268		NA

r5dv17h

Variable label:	Support/oppose: Some Muslim women stop working when they have children, because the family wishes this
Literal question:	Some Muslim women stop working when they have children, because the family wishes this. To what extent are you in support of or opposed to this?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran15=8]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Support a lot	2	1.1%	0.01081081
2	Support	8	4.3%	0.04324324
3	Support somewhat	6	3.2%	0.03243243
4	Neither support nor oppose	77	41.6%	0.41621622
5	Oppose somewhat	29	15.7%	0.15675676
6	Oppose	31	16.8%	0.16756757
7	Oppose a lot	27	14.6%	0.14594595
97	No answer	5	2.7%	0.02702703
98	Not asked	5266		NA

r5dv18

Variable label:	Do you agree or disagree that Muslim girls should be allowed to wear a veil at school?
Literal question:	Do you agree or disagree that Muslim girls should be allowed to wear a veil at school?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Agree	375	26.4%	0.26445698
2	Disagree	983	69.3%	0.69322990
97	No answer	60	4.2%	0.04231312
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5ran16_1

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:375] [Invalid:5076] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	188	50.1%	0.5013333
2	2	187	49.9%	0.4986667
Sysmiss		5076		NA

r5ran16_2

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:983] [Invalid:4468] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	492	50.1%	0.5005086
2	2	491	49.9%	0.4994914
Sysmiss		4468		NA

r5dv19a

Variable label:	Consideration: Veil makes girls stand out from fellow pupils
Literal question:	If you take into consideration that this means that they are set apart from their fellow pupils, how much do you agree or disagree that it would have been better if they were not allowed to wear a veil at school?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran16_1=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	3	1.6%	0.01595745
2	Agree	5	2.7%	0.02659574
3	Agree somewhat	25	13.3%	0.13297872
4	Neither agree nor disagree	51	27.1%	0.27127660
5	Disagree somewhat	32	17.0%	0.17021277
6	Disagree	48	25.5%	0.25531915
7	Strongly disagree	24	12.8%	0.12765957
97	No answer	0	0.0%	0.00000000
98	Not asked	5263		NA

r5dv19b

Variable label:	Consideration: The use of veil in schools is a complex issue, not allowed
Literal question:	If you take into consideration how complex these questions are, how much do you agree or disagree that it would have been better if they were not allowed to wear a veil at school?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran16_1=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	1	0.5%	0.005347594
2	Agree	10	5.3%	0.053475936
3	Agree somewhat	25	13.4%	0.133689840
4	Neither agree nor disagree	39	20.9%	0.208556150
5	Disagree somewhat	45	24.1%	0.240641711
6	Disagree	50	26.7%	0.267379679
7	Strongly disagree	15	8.0%	0.080213904
97	No answer	2	1.1%	0.010695187
98	Not asked	5264		NA

r5dv20a

Variable label:	Consideration: Cultural and religious traditions are imporant
Literal question:	If you take into consideration how important cultural and religious traditions are in people’s lives, how much do you agree or disagree that it would have been better if they were not allowed to wear a veil at school?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran16_1=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	3	0.6%	0.006097561
2	Agree	5	1.0%	0.010162602
3	Agree somewhat	31	6.3%	0.063008130
4	Neither agree nor disagree	43	8.7%	0.087398374
5	Disagree somewhat	86	17.5%	0.174796748
6	Disagree	173	35.2%	0.351626016
7	Strongly disagree	145	29.5%	0.294715447
97	No answer	6	1.2%	0.012195122
98	Not asked	4959		NA

r5dv20b

Variable label:	Consideration: The use of veil in schools is a complex issue, allowed
Literal question:	If you take into consideration how complex these questions are, how much do you agree or disagree that it would have been better if they were allowed to wear a veil at school?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran16_1=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	3	0.6%	0.00610998
2	Agree	0	0.0%	0.00000000
3	Agree somewhat	27	5.5%	0.05498982
4	Neither agree nor disagree	51	10.4%	0.10386965
5	Disagree somewhat	76	15.5%	0.15478615
6	Disagree	195	39.7%	0.39714868
7	Strongly disagree	134	27.3%	0.27291242
97	No answer	5	1.0%	0.01018330
98	Not asked	4960		NA

r5dv21_1

Variable label:	Statement: Muslims have a great many positive things to bring to Norwegian culture
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Muslims have a great many positive things to bring to Norwegian culture.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	204	14.4%	0.14386460
2	Slightly agree	689	48.6%	0.48589563
3	Slightly disagree	292	20.6%	0.20592384
4	Strongly disagree	176	12.4%	0.12411848
97	No answer	57	4.0%	0.04019746
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv21_2

Variable label:	Statement: Muslim men dominate the women
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Muslim men dominate the women.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	624	44.0%	0.44005642
2	Slightly agree	600	42.3%	0.42313117
3	Slightly disagree	89	6.3%	0.06276446
4	Strongly disagree	37	2.6%	0.02609309
97	No answer	68	4.8%	0.04795487
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv21_3

Variable label:	Statement: The western European mode of living is not consistent with the Muslim mode of living
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	The western European mode of living is not consistent with the Muslim mode of living.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	271	19.1%	0.19111425
2	Slightly agree	483	34.1%	0.34062059
3	Slightly disagree	470	33.1%	0.33145275
4	Strongly disagree	133	9.4%	0.09379408
97	No answer	61	4.3%	0.04301834
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv21_4

Variable label:	Statement: Most Muslims in Norway respect other people’s culture and mode of living
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Most Muslims in Norway respect other people’s culture and mode of living.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	291	20.5%	0.20521862
2	Slightly agree	650	45.8%	0.45839210
3	Slightly disagree	303	21.4%	0.21368124
4	Strongly disagree	118	8.3%	0.08321580
97	No answer	56	3.9%	0.03949224
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv21_5

Variable label:	Statement: Muslims in Norway bring their children up in an authoritarian way
Pre-question text:	How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Muslims in Norway bring their children up in an authoritarian way.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	166	11.7%	0.11706629
2	Slightly agree	772	54.4%	0.54442877
3	Slightly disagree	324	22.8%	0.22849083
4	Strongly disagree	49	3.5%	0.03455571
97	No answer	107	7.5%	0.07545839
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv22

Variable label:	Would you turned back time in Norway with 20-30 years, or do you prefer the present-day Norway
Literal question:	Let us suppose that it is possible to turn the clock back to Norway as it was 20-30 years ago. Would you do it, or do you prefer present-day Norway on the whole?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Would turn the clock back	289	20.4%	0.20380818
2	Prefer present-day Norway	799	56.3%	0.56346968
3	Don't know	289	20.4%	0.20380818
97	No answer	41	2.9%	0.02891396
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv23_1

Variable label:	Do you think people care most about their own private lives or what is best for society as a whole
Literal question:	Do you think that people these days are most concerned about their own private lives or about what is best for society as a whole?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1 Mostly about their own private lives	281	19.8%	0.198166432
2	2	347	24.5%	0.244710860
3	3	420	29.6%	0.296191819
4	4	174	12.3%	0.122708039
5	5	95	6.7%	0.066995769
6	6	23	1.6%	0.016220028
7	7 Mostly about society as a whole	10	0.7%	0.007052186
8	Don't know	33	2.3%	0.023272214
97	No answer	35	2.5%	0.024682652
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv24

Variable label:	Statement: Violent crime should be punished much more heavily than it is today
Pre-question text:	Do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question:	Violent crime should be punished much more heavily than it is today.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	679	47.9%	0.478843441
2	Somewhat agree	472	33.3%	0.332863188
3	Neutral	150	10.6%	0.105782793
4	Somewhat disagree	45	3.2%	0.031734838
5	Strongly disagree	13	0.9%	0.009167842
6	Don't know	20	1.4%	0.014104372
97	No answer	39	2.8%	0.027503526
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5ran17

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1391] [Invalid:4060] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	269	19.3%	0.1933861
2	2	278	20.0%	0.1998562
3	3	304	21.9%	0.2185478
4	4	286	20.6%	0.2056075
5	5	254	18.3%	0.1826024
Sysmiss		4060		NA

r5dv26a

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Even if an adult asylum seeker has been rejected, in the children’s best interest the government may consider allowing residence if the children are entitled to live in the country
Pre-question text:	Even if an adult asylum seeker has been rejected, in the children’s best interest the government may consider allowing residence if the children are entitled to live in the country.
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that an asylum seeker who has been rejected should be allowed to stay in such cases?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran17=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	29	10.8%	0.10780669
2	Agree	78	29.0%	0.28996283
3	Agree somewhat	56	20.8%	0.20817844
4	Neither agree nor disagree	31	11.5%	0.11524164
5	Disagree somewhat	23	8.6%	0.08550186
6	Disagree	25	9.3%	0.09293680
7	Strongly disagree	24	8.9%	0.08921933
97	No answer	3	1.1%	0.01115242
98	Not asked	5182		NA

r5dv26b

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The European Court of Human Rights has declared that even if an adult asylum seeker has been rejected, in the children’s best interest the government should consider allowing residence if the children are entitled to live in the country
Pre-question text:	The European Court of Human Rights has declared that even if an adult asylum seeker has been rejected, in the children’s best interest the government should consider allowing residence if the children are entitled to live in the country.
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that an asylum seeker who has been rejected should be allowed to stay in such cases?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran17=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	32	11.5%	0.11510791
2	Agree	79	28.4%	0.28417266
3	Agree somewhat	65	23.4%	0.23381295
4	Neither agree nor disagree	18	6.5%	0.06474820
5	Disagree somewhat	28	10.1%	0.10071942
6	Disagree	30	10.8%	0.10791367
7	Strongly disagree	20	7.2%	0.07194245
97	No answer	6	2.2%	0.02158273
98	Not asked	5173		NA

r5dv26c

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child states that even if an adult asylum seeker has been rejected, in the children’s best interest the government should consider allowing residence if the children are entitled to live in the country
Pre-question text:	The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child states that even if an adult asylum seeker has been rejected, in the children’s best interest the government should consider allowing residence if the children are entitled to live in the country.
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that an asylum seeker who has been rejected should be allowed to stay in such cases?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran17=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	45	14.8%	0.148026316
2	Agree	88	28.9%	0.289473684
3	Agree somewhat	63	20.7%	0.207236842
4	Neither agree nor disagree	40	13.2%	0.131578947
5	Disagree somewhat	22	7.2%	0.072368421
6	Disagree	17	5.6%	0.055921053
7	Strongly disagree	27	8.9%	0.088815789
97	No answer	2	0.7%	0.006578947
98	Not asked	5147		NA

r5dv26d

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The Canadian Supreme Court has declared that even if an adult asylum seeker has been rejected, in the children’s best interest the government should consider allowing residence if the children are entitled to live in the country
Pre-question text:	The Canadian Supreme Court has declared that even if an adult asylum seeker has been rejected, in the children’s best interest the government should consider allowing residence if the children are entitled to live in the country.
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that an asylum seeker who has been rejected should be allowed to stay in such cases?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran17=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	43	15.0%	0.15034965
2	Agree	76	26.6%	0.26573427
3	Agree somewhat	67	23.4%	0.23426573
4	Neither agree nor disagree	23	8.0%	0.08041958
5	Disagree somewhat	24	8.4%	0.08391608
6	Disagree	25	8.7%	0.08741259
7	Strongly disagree	22	7.7%	0.07692308
97	No answer	6	2.1%	0.02097902
98	Not asked	5165		NA

r5dv26e

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: The Norwegian Supreme Court has declared that even if an adult asylum seeker has been rejected, in the children’s best interest the government should consider allowing residence if the children are entitled to live in the country
Pre-question text:	The Norwegian Supreme Court has declared that even if an adult asylum seeker has been rejected, in the children’s best interest the government should consider allowing residence if the children are entitled to live in the country.
Literal question:	How much do you agree or disagree that an asylum seeker who has been rejected should be allowed to stay in such cases?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran17=5]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	30	11.8%	0.11811024
2	Agree	68	26.8%	0.26771654
3	Agree somewhat	51	20.1%	0.20078740
4	Neither agree nor disagree	34	13.4%	0.13385827
5	Disagree somewhat	25	9.8%	0.09842520
6	Disagree	16	6.3%	0.06299213
7	Strongly disagree	26	10.2%	0.10236220
97	No answer	4	1.6%	0.01574803
98	Not asked	5197		NA

r5ran18

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1389] [Invalid:4062] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	332	23.9%	0.2390209
2	2	339	24.4%	0.2440605
3	3	360	25.9%	0.2591793
4	4	358	25.8%	0.2577394
Sysmiss		4062		NA

r5dv27a

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Prohibition on purchasing sexual services
Pre-question text:	In 2008, the Norwegian parliament (the Storting) passed an act that prohibits the purchase of sexual services in Norway.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the prohibition on purchasing sexual services in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran18=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	83	25.0%	0.25000000
2	Agree	89	26.8%	0.26807229
3	Agree somewhat	33	9.9%	0.09939759
4	Neither agree nor disagree	52	15.7%	0.15662651
5	Disagree somewhat	24	7.2%	0.07228916
6	Disagree	29	8.7%	0.08734940
7	Strongly disagree	15	4.5%	0.04518072
97	No answer	7	2.1%	0.02108434
98	Not asked	5119		NA

r5dv27b

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Prohibition on purchasing sexual services, Amnesty International has gone out against ban
Pre-question text:	In 2008, the Norwegian parliament (the Storting) passed an act that prohibits the purchase of sexual services in Norway. Amnesty International opposes such a ban on prostitution, because it makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse and consequently puts their lives and health in danger.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the prohibition on purchasing sexual services in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran18=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	53	15.6%	0.15634218
2	Agree	61	18.0%	0.17994100
3	Agree somewhat	40	11.8%	0.11799410
4	Neither agree nor disagree	68	20.1%	0.20058997
5	Disagree somewhat	54	15.9%	0.15929204
6	Disagree	35	10.3%	0.10324484
7	Strongly disagree	23	6.8%	0.06784661
97	No answer	5	1.5%	0.01474926
98	Not asked	5112		NA

r5dv27c

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Prohibition on purchasing sexual services, WHO has gone out against ban
Pre-question text:	In 2008, the Norwegian parliament (the Storting) passed an act that prohibits the purchase of sexual services in Norway. The World Health Organisation opposes such a ban on prostitution, because it makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse and consequently puts their lives and health in danger.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the prohibition on purchasing sexual services in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran18=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	52	14.4%	0.14444444
2	Agree	78	21.7%	0.21666667
3	Agree somewhat	31	8.6%	0.08611111
4	Neither agree nor disagree	83	23.1%	0.23055556
5	Disagree somewhat	41	11.4%	0.11388889
6	Disagree	46	12.8%	0.12777778
7	Strongly disagree	22	6.1%	0.06111111
97	No answer	7	1.9%	0.01944444
98	Not asked	5091		NA

r5dv27d

Variable label:	Agree/disagree: Prohibition on purchasing sexual services, The UN Special Rapporteur opposes such a ban
Pre-question text:	In 2008, the Norwegian parliament (the Storting) passed an act that prohibits the purchase of sexual services in Norway. The UN Special Rapporteur opposes such a ban on prostitution, because it makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse and consequently puts their lives and health in danger.
Literal question:	To what extent do you agree or disagree with the prohibition on purchasing sexual services in Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4 and ran18=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	52	14.5%	0.14525140
2	Agree	63	17.6%	0.17597765
3	Agree somewhat	41	11.5%	0.11452514
4	Neither agree nor disagree	85	23.7%	0.23743017
5	Disagree somewhat	40	11.2%	0.11173184
6	Disagree	46	12.8%	0.12849162
7	Strongly disagree	25	7.0%	0.06983240
97	No answer	6	1.7%	0.01675978
98	Not asked	5093		NA

r5dv28_1

Variable label:	Statement: Real Norwegian culture is now disappearing so fast that we must do everything in our power to save it
Pre-question text:	Below are a number of statements about Norwegian society with which you may agree or disagree. We are interested in your personal opinion about these.
Literal question:	Real Norwegian culture is now disappearing so fast that we must do everything in our power to save it.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5DV28_feedback]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	99	7.0%	0.06981664
2	Agree	171	12.1%	0.12059238
3	Agree somewhat	296	20.9%	0.20874471
4	Neither agree nor disagree	171	12.1%	0.12059238
5	Disagree somewhat	166	11.7%	0.11706629
6	Disagree	310	21.9%	0.21861777
7	Strongly disagree	151	10.6%	0.10648801
97	No answer	54	3.8%	0.03808181
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv28_2

Variable label:	Statement: I am afraid that ordinary people in Norway will not have much freedom left in a few year’s time
Pre-question text:	Below are a number of statements about Norwegian society with which you may agree or disagree. We are interested in your personal opinion about these.
Literal question:	I am afraid that ordinary people in Norway will not have much freedom left in a few year’s time.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5DV28_feedback]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	53	3.7%	0.03737659
2	Agree	137	9.7%	0.09661495
3	Agree somewhat	239	16.9%	0.16854725
4	Neither agree nor disagree	195	13.8%	0.13751763
5	Disagree somewhat	180	12.7%	0.12693935
6	Disagree	407	28.7%	0.28702398
7	Strongly disagree	154	10.9%	0.10860367
97	No answer	53	3.7%	0.03737659
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv28_3

Variable label:	Statement: Most people in Norway do not realise how much their lives are being controlled by secret plans made in hidden fora that we never find out about
Pre-question text:	Below are a number of statements about Norwegian society with which you may agree or disagree. We are interested in your personal opinion about these.
Literal question:	Most people in Norway do not realise how much their lives are being controlled by secret plans made in hidden fora that we never find out about.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5DV28_feedback]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	42	3.0%	0.02961918
2	Agree	125	8.8%	0.08815233
3	Agree somewhat	240	16.9%	0.16925247
4	Neither agree nor disagree	343	24.2%	0.24188999
5	Disagree somewhat	131	9.2%	0.09238364
6	Disagree	272	19.2%	0.19181946
7	Strongly disagree	203	14.3%	0.14315938
97	No answer	62	4.4%	0.04372355
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv28_4

Variable label:	Statement: Most people in Norway do not realise how much their lives are being controlled by secret plans made in hidden fora that we never find out about
Pre-question text:	Below are a number of statements about Norwegian society with which you may agree or disagree. We are interested in your personal opinion about these.
Literal question:	Most people in Norway do not realise how much their lives are being controlled by secret plans made in hidden fora that we never find out about.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5DV28_feedback]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	66	4.7%	0.04654443
2	Agree	198	14.0%	0.13963329
3	Agree somewhat	385	27.2%	0.27150917
4	Neither agree nor disagree	284	20.0%	0.20028209
5	Disagree somewhat	170	12.0%	0.11988717
6	Disagree	216	15.2%	0.15232722
7	Strongly disagree	41	2.9%	0.02891396
97	No answer	58	4.1%	0.04090268
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv28_5

Variable label:	Statement: There are forces in society that could change Norway in a way that makes the country worse to live in
Pre-question text:	Below are a number of statements about Norwegian society with which you may agree or disagree. We are interested in your personal opinion about these.
Literal question:	There are forces in society that could change Norway in a way that makes the country worse to live in.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5DV28_feedback]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	84	5.9%	0.05923836
2	Agree	204	14.4%	0.14386460
3	Agree somewhat	444	31.3%	0.31311707
4	Neither agree nor disagree	240	16.9%	0.16925247
5	Disagree somewhat	129	9.1%	0.09097320
6	Disagree	205	14.5%	0.14456982
7	Strongly disagree	53	3.7%	0.03737659
97	No answer	59	4.2%	0.04160790
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv28_6

Variable label:	Statement: As soon as immigrants come to Norway they try to undermine society by refusing to follow our laws
Pre-question text:	Below are a number of statements about Norwegian society with which you may agree or disagree. We are interested in your personal opinion about these.
Literal question:	As soon as immigrants come to Norway they try to undermine society by refusing to follow our laws.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5DV28_feedback]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Strongly agree	58	4.1%	0.04090268
2	Agree	96	6.8%	0.06770099
3	Agree somewhat	245	17.3%	0.17277856
4	Neither agree nor disagree	178	12.6%	0.12552891
5	Disagree somewhat	195	13.8%	0.13751763
6	Disagree	390	27.5%	0.27503526
7	Strongly disagree	202	14.2%	0.14245416
97	No answer	54	3.8%	0.03808181
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5dv28_feedback

Variable label:	Feedback and comments on statements [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Use the text box below if you have any feedback or comments about the statements.
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4. Note: Question is asked on the same page as R5DV28_1 to R5DV28_6] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5dv39

Variable label:	How often do you think, read or talk about July 22nd
Literal question:	It’s now been more than four years since the attacks of 22 July 2011. When it comes to you personally, how often would you say that you now think about, read or talk about something that is related to 22 July?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Daily	7	0.5%	0.00493653
2	Weekly	93	6.6%	0.06558533
3	A few times a month	369	26.0%	0.26022567
4	Less often, but it happens	818	57.7%	0.57686883
5	Never	91	6.4%	0.06417489
97	No answer	40	2.8%	0.02820874
98	Not asked	4033		NA

r5ran3

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1390] [Invalid:4061] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	656	47.2%	0.4719424
2	2	734	52.8%	0.5280576
Sysmiss		4061		NA

r5ran3_1

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:656] [Invalid:4795] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	324	49.4%	0.4939024
2	2	332	50.6%	0.5060976
Sysmiss		4795		NA

r5ran3_2

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:734] [Invalid:4717] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	345	47.0%	0.4700272
2	2	389	53.0%	0.5299728
Sysmiss		4717		NA

r5pad10a_1

Variable label:	Dictator: Choose to give the following amount to the other person
Pre-question text:	To take part in the lottery, please answer within 10 seconds.
Literal question:	If I receive 2,000 kroner, I choose to give the following amount to the other person (between 0 and 2,000):
Technical description:	Before recieving this question, the respondent was shown an info-node on a separate page with the following text: “As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you are included in a draw for an extra cash prize. 2 people are drawn out: person A and person B. Person A receives 2,000 kroner and chooses how much is to be shared with person B. Go to the next page to make a decision.” [Asked if u=2 and ran3_1=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-20]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	21	6.5%	0.064814815
1	100	3	0.9%	0.009259259
2	200	1	0.3%	0.003086420
3	300	3	0.9%	0.009259259
4	400	4	1.2%	0.012345679
5	500	13	4.0%	0.040123457
6	600	0	0.0%	0.000000000
7	700	2	0.6%	0.006172840
8	800	5	1.5%	0.015432099
9	900	7	2.2%	0.021604938
10	1000	228	70.4%	0.703703704
11	1100	1	0.3%	0.003086420
12	1200	6	1.9%	0.018518519
13	1300	2	0.6%	0.006172840
14	1400	2	0.6%	0.006172840
15	1500	6	1.9%	0.018518519
16	1600	0	0.0%	0.000000000
17	1700	0	0.0%	0.000000000
18	1800	1	0.3%	0.003086420
19	1900	0	0.0%	0.000000000
20	2000	15	4.6%	0.046296296
97	No answer	4	1.2%	0.012345679
98	Not asked	5127		NA

timespent_r5pad10a

Variable label:	Time spent on r5pad10a
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5PAD10a_1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1390] [Invalid:4061] [Range:0-64]

r5pad10b_1

Variable label:	Dictator: Choose to give the following amount to the other person
Pre-question text:	To take part in the lottery, please wait at least 10 seconds before answering:
Literal question:	If I receive 2,000 kroner, I choose to give the following amount to the other person (between 0 and 2,000):
Technical description:	Before recieving this question, the respondent was shown an info-node on a separate page with the following text: “As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you are included in a draw for an extra cash prize. 2 people are drawn out: person A and person B. Person A receives 2,000 kroner and chooses how much is to be shared with person B. Go to the next page to make a decision.” [Asked if u=2 and ran3_1=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-20]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	12	3.6%	0.036144578
1	100	4	1.2%	0.012048193
2	200	1	0.3%	0.003012048
3	300	0	0.0%	0.000000000
4	400	0	0.0%	0.000000000
5	500	13	3.9%	0.039156627
6	600	1	0.3%	0.003012048
7	700	2	0.6%	0.006024096
8	800	2	0.6%	0.006024096
9	900	2	0.6%	0.006024096
10	1000	262	78.9%	0.789156627
11	1100	1	0.3%	0.003012048
12	1200	3	0.9%	0.009036145
13	1300	1	0.3%	0.003012048
14	1400	0	0.0%	0.000000000
15	1500	2	0.6%	0.006024096
16	1600	0	0.0%	0.000000000
17	1700	1	0.3%	0.003012048
18	1800	0	0.0%	0.000000000
19	1900	0	0.0%	0.000000000
20	2000	19	5.7%	0.057228916
97	No answer	6	1.8%	0.018072289
98	Not asked	5119		NA

timespent_r5pad10b

Variable label:	Time spent on r5pad10b
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5PAD10b_1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1389] [Invalid:4062] [Range:0-76]

r5pad7_8_background

Variable label:	Background variable for r5pad7 and r5pad8
Technical description:	[Background variable for r5pad7 and r5pad8]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	Not relevant	3487	64.0%	0.63969914
1	Asked R4PAD22 and R5PAD7	385	7.1%	0.07062924
2	Not asked R4PAD22, but R5PAD7	628	11.5%	0.11520822
3	Asked R4PAD22, not R5PAD7	353	6.5%	0.06475876
4	Not asked R4PAD22, and not R5PAD7	598	11.0%	0.10970464

r5pad7

Variable label:	Extra prize of 1000 or 1800 kroner, explain your choice [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you are included in a draw for an extra monetary prize. If you win you must choose to receive either 1,000 kroner or 1,800 kroner. Before you indicate your choice on the next page, can you briefly explain why you made this choice?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=1 OR u=3 R5PAD7_background=1 OR R5PAD7_background=2] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5pad8

Variable label:	Extra prize of 1000 or 1800 kroner, what do you choose
Literal question:	As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you are being included in a draw for an extra monetary prize. If you win you must choose between receiving 1,000 kroner or 1,800 kroner. Which would you choose?
Technical description:	Please mark one of the options. [Asked if u=1 OR u=3 and R5PAD8_background=1 OR R5PAD8_background=2 OR R5PAD7_background=1 OR R5PAD7_background=2] [R5PAD7_background/R5PAD8_background are background variables and is not included in the dataset]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Yes please, I would like to receive 1,000 kroner	548	21.1%	0.2107692
2	Yes please, I would like to receive 1,800 kroner	1325	51.0%	0.5096154
97	No answer	727	28.0%	0.2796154
98	Not asked	2851		NA

timespent_r5pad8

Variable label:	Time spent on r5pad8
Technical description:	[Tidsangivelsesvariabel - viser tidsbruken på R5PAD8]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2565] [Invalid:2886] [Range:0-605555]

r5dictatorgame_1

Variable label:	Dictator Game: If I receive 2,000 kroner, I choose to give the following amount to the other person
Pre-question text:	As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you are being included in a draw for an extra monetary prize. 2 people are drawn out: person A and person B. Person A receives 2,000 kroner and chooses how much is to be shared with person B.
Literal question:	If I receive 2,000 kroner, I choose to give the following amount to the other person (between 0 and 2,000):
Technical description:	[Asked if u=0]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-20]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	310	5.7%	0.0568702990
1	100	12	0.2%	0.0022014309
2	200	31	0.6%	0.0056870299
3	300	10	0.2%	0.0018345258
4	400	14	0.3%	0.0025683361
5	500	257	4.7%	0.0471473124
6	600	11	0.2%	0.0020179784
7	700	22	0.4%	0.0040359567
8	800	53	1.0%	0.0097229866
9	900	31	0.6%	0.0056870299
10	1000	4171	76.5%	0.7651807008
11	1100	11	0.2%	0.0020179784
12	1200	16	0.3%	0.0029352412
13	1300	3	0.1%	0.0005503577
14	1400	2	0.0%	0.0003669052
15	1500	30	0.6%	0.0055035773
16	1600	4	0.1%	0.0007338103
17	1700	1	0.0%	0.0001834526
18	1800	3	0.1%	0.0005503577
19	1900	2	0.0%	0.0003669052
20	2000	250	4.6%	0.0458631444
97	No answer	207	3.8%	0.0379746835

timespent_dictatorgame

Variable label:	Time spent on dictatorgame
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5Dictatorgame_1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5336] [Invalid:115] [Range:1-167964]

r5pad12a_1

Variable label:	10 seconds to answer: If I receive 2,000 kroner, I choose to give the following amount to the other person
Pre-question text:	To take part in the lottery, please answer within 10 seconds.
Literal question:	If I receive 2,000 kroner, I choose to give the following amount to the other person (between 0 and 2,000):
Technical description:	Before recieving this question, the respondent was shown an info-node on a separate page with the following text: “As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you are being included in a draw for an extra monetary prize. 2 people are drawn out: person A and person B. Person A receives 2,000 kroner and chooses how much is to be shared with person B. Go to the next page to make a decision.” [Asked if u=2 and ran3_2=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-20]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	17	4.9%	0.049275362
1	100	2	0.6%	0.005797101
2	200	2	0.6%	0.005797101
3	300	0	0.0%	0.000000000
4	400	1	0.3%	0.002898551
5	500	12	3.5%	0.034782609
6	600	1	0.3%	0.002898551
7	700	1	0.3%	0.002898551
8	800	1	0.3%	0.002898551
9	900	1	0.3%	0.002898551
10	1000	280	81.2%	0.811594203
11	1100	3	0.9%	0.008695652
12	1200	1	0.3%	0.002898551
13	1300	0	0.0%	0.000000000
14	1400	0	0.0%	0.000000000
15	1500	1	0.3%	0.002898551
16	1600	0	0.0%	0.000000000
17	1700	0	0.0%	0.000000000
18	1800	1	0.3%	0.002898551
19	1900	0	0.0%	0.000000000
20	2000	12	3.5%	0.034782609
97	No answer	9	2.6%	0.026086957
98	Not asked	5106		NA

timespent_r5pad12a

Variable label:	Time spent on r5pad12a
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5PAD12a_1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1388] [Invalid:4063] [Range:0-58]

r5pad12b_1

Variable label:	Wait 10 seconds to answer: If I receive 2,000 kroner, I choose to give the following amount to the other person
Pre-question text:	To take part in the lottery, please wait at least 10 seconds before answering:
Literal question:	If I receive 2,000 kroner, I choose to give the following amount to the other person (between 0 and 2,000):
Technical description:	Before recieving this question, the respondent was shown an info-node on a separate page with the following text: “As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you are being included in a draw for an extra monetary prize. 2 people are drawn out: person A and person B. Person A receives 2,000 kroner and chooses how much is to be shared with person B. Go to the next page to make a decision.” [Asked if u=2 and ran3_2=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-20]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	22	5.7%	0.056555270
1	100	0	0.0%	0.000000000
2	200	1	0.3%	0.002570694
3	300	2	0.5%	0.005141388
4	400	0	0.0%	0.000000000
5	500	17	4.4%	0.043701799
6	600	2	0.5%	0.005141388
7	700	2	0.5%	0.005141388
8	800	2	0.5%	0.005141388
9	900	2	0.5%	0.005141388
10	1000	314	80.7%	0.807197943
11	1100	2	0.5%	0.005141388
12	1200	2	0.5%	0.005141388
13	1300	0	0.0%	0.000000000
14	1400	0	0.0%	0.000000000
15	1500	4	1.0%	0.010282776
16	1600	0	0.0%	0.000000000
17	1700	0	0.0%	0.000000000
18	1800	0	0.0%	0.000000000
19	1900	1	0.3%	0.002570694
20	2000	13	3.3%	0.033419023
97	No answer	3	0.8%	0.007712082
98	Not asked	5062		NA

timespent_r5pad12b

Variable label:	Time spent on r5pad12b
Technical description:	[Time stamp variable - records time spent on R5PAD12b_1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1388] [Invalid:4063] [Range:0-78]

r5ran4

Variable label:	[Randomizes if u=3]
Technical description:	[Randomizes if u=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1259] [Invalid:4192] [Range:1-4]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1	308	24.5%	0.2446386
2	2	306	24.3%	0.2430500
3	3	317	25.2%	0.2517871
4	4	328	26.1%	0.2605242
Sysmiss		4192		NA

r5pad13a_1

Variable label:	Joint contribution: The person in the group who puts in the least is excluded from the group and loses his or her 1,000 kroner
Pre-question text:	Three participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel are drawn to win an extra cash prize. These three are put together in a group. Every person in the group receives 1,000 kroner to begin with. The final amount of the cash prize depends on what choices the people in the group make in the decisions below. Each participant is to choose how much of his or her 1,000 kroner will be put into a joint kitty for the group. The person in the group who puts in the least is excluded from the group and loses his or her 1,000 kroner. The two remaining people’s contribution to the kitty is increased by 50 per cent and then divided equally between the two. The final cash prize is each individual’s portion of the kitty and the money that was kept.
Literal question:	If you were drawn out to win 1,000 kroner, how much would you put into the joint kitty?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran4=1]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	4	1.3%	0.01298701
1	100	4	1.3%	0.01298701
2	200	7	2.3%	0.02272727
3	300	19	6.2%	0.06168831
4	400	8	2.6%	0.02597403
5	500	129	41.9%	0.41883117
6	600	14	4.5%	0.04545455
7	700	12	3.9%	0.03896104
8	800	9	2.9%	0.02922078
9	900	5	1.6%	0.01623377
10	1000	82	26.6%	0.26623377
97	No answer	15	4.9%	0.04870130
98	Not asked	5143		NA

r5pad13b_1

Variable label:	Joint contribution: The person in the group who puts in the least is excluded from the group, but keeps his or her 1,000 kroner
Pre-question text:	Three participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel are drawn to win an extra cash prize. These three are put together in a group. Every person in the group receives 1,000 kroner to begin with. The final amount of the cash prize depends on what choices the people in the group make in the decisions below. Each participant is to choose how much of his or her 1,000 kroner will be put into a joint kitty for the group. The person in the group who puts in the least is excluded from the group, but keeps his or her 1,000 kroner. The two remaining people’s contribution to the kitty is increased by 50 per cent and then divided equally between the two. The final cash prize is each individual’s portion of the kitty and the money that was kept.
Literal question:	If you were drawn out to win 1,000 kroner, how much would you put into the joint kitty?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran4=2]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	9	2.9%	0.029411765
1	100	6	2.0%	0.019607843
2	200	7	2.3%	0.022875817
3	300	21	6.9%	0.068627451
4	400	10	3.3%	0.032679739
5	500	129	42.2%	0.421568627
6	600	9	2.9%	0.029411765
7	700	6	2.0%	0.019607843
8	800	3	1.0%	0.009803922
9	900	2	0.7%	0.006535948
10	1000	90	29.4%	0.294117647
97	No answer	14	4.6%	0.045751634
98	Not asked	5145		NA

r5pad13c_1

Variable label:	Joint contribution: A person is drawn at random to be excluded from the group and loses his or her 1,000 kroner
Pre-question text:	Three participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel are drawn to win an extra cash prize. These three are put together in a group. Every person in the group receives 1,000 kroner to begin with. The final amount of the cash prize depends on what choices the people in the group make in the decisions below. Each participant is to choose how much of his or her 1,000 kroner will be put into a joint kitty for the group. A person is drawn at random to be excluded from the group and loses his or her 1,000 kroner. The two remaining people’s contribution to the kitty is increased by 50 per cent and then divided equally between the two. The final cash prize is each individual’s portion of the kitty and the money that was kept.
Literal question:	If you were drawn out to win 1,000 kroner, how much would you put into the joint kitty?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran4=3]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	25	7.9%	0.078864353
1	100	7	2.2%	0.022082019
2	200	13	4.1%	0.041009464
3	300	41	12.9%	0.129337539
4	400	9	2.8%	0.028391167
5	500	135	42.6%	0.425867508
6	600	2	0.6%	0.006309148
7	700	4	1.3%	0.012618297
8	800	1	0.3%	0.003154574
9	900	2	0.6%	0.006309148
10	1000	65	20.5%	0.205047319
97	No answer	13	4.1%	0.041009464
98	Not asked	5134		NA

r5pad13d_1

Variable label:	Joint contribution: A person is drawn at random to be excluded from the group, but keeps his or her 1,000 kroner
Pre-question text:	Three participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel are drawn to win an extra cash prize. These three are put together in a group. Every person in the group receives 1,000 kroner to begin with. The final amount of the cash prize depends on what choices the people in the group make in the decisions below. Each participant is to choose how much of his or her 1,000 kroner will be put into a joint kitty for the group. A person is drawn at random to be excluded from the group, but keeps his or her 1,000 kroner. The two remaining people’s contribution to the kitty is increased by 50 per cent and then divided equally between the two. The final cash prize is each individual’s portion of the kitty and the money that was kept.
Literal question:	If you were drawn out to win 1,000 kroner, how much would you put into the joint kitty?
Technical description:	[Asked if u=3 and ran4=4]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
0	0	28	8.5%	0.085365854
1	100	4	1.2%	0.012195122
2	200	21	6.4%	0.064024390
3	300	22	6.7%	0.067073171
4	400	10	3.0%	0.030487805
5	500	134	40.9%	0.408536585
6	600	3	0.9%	0.009146341
7	700	4	1.2%	0.012195122
8	800	3	0.9%	0.009146341
9	900	1	0.3%	0.003048780
10	1000	71	21.6%	0.216463415
97	No answer	27	8.2%	0.082317073
98	Not asked	5123		NA

r5k20

Variable label:	Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days
Pre-question text:	We will now ask you some questions about your background.
Literal question:	Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Paid work (or temporarily absent)	43	66.2%	0.66153846
2	Studying (not paid for by an employer)	6	9.2%	0.09230769
3	Unemployed and actively seeking work	2	3.1%	0.03076923
4	Unemployed, wanting a job, but not actively seeking work	2	3.1%	0.03076923
5	Permanently ill or disabled	1	1.5%	0.01538462
6	Retired	3	4.6%	0.04615385
7	Civilian or military service	0	0.0%	0.00000000
8	At home, looking after children or others	0	0.0%	0.00000000
9	Other	2	3.1%	0.03076923
97	No answer	6	9.2%	0.09230769
98	Not asked	5386		NA

r5k21

Variable label:	What type of company do you work for?
Literal question:	What type of company do you work for?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Government, county or municipal administration	4	6.2%	0.06153846
2	Public sector (e.g. school or the health service)	12	18.5%	0.18461538
3	Publicly owned company	1	1.5%	0.01538462
4	Private company	22	33.8%	0.33846154
5	Self-employed	2	3.1%	0.03076923
6	Other:	2	3.1%	0.03076923
97	No answer	22	33.8%	0.33846154
98	Not asked	5386		NA

r5k21_6_other

Variable label:	What type of company do you work for, other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What type of company do you work for?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5k323

Variable label:	Name/title of main profession [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What is the name or title of your main profession?
Technical description:	Please enter your full job title. Please be as specific as possible. Here are a few examples: Nurse. 6th form college teacher. Shop assistant. [Asked respondents if background information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5k323a

Variable label:	Main tasks and duties in the main profession [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	What are your main tasks or duties in your main profession?
Technical description:	Please provide as many details as possible. Here are a few examples: Provide assistance and administer medication at an old people’s home. Prepare teaching material. Teach Norwegian and mathematics and mark exams. Sell shoes and help customers in a shop. [Asked respondents if background information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5k23b

Variable label:	Are you responsible for managing the work of other employees in your main job?
Literal question:	Are you responsible for managing the work of other employees in your main job?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	28	43.1%	0.43076923
2	Yes, I manage 10 or more employees.	5	7.7%	0.07692308
3	Yes, I manage less than 10 employees.	9	13.8%	0.13846154
97	No answer	23	35.4%	0.35384615
98	Not asked	5386		NA

r5k25

Variable label:	What is your current income?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	< 150 000	18	12.6%	0.12587413
2	150 001 - 300 000	17	11.9%	0.11888112
3	300 001 - 400 000	21	14.7%	0.14685315
4	400 001 - 500 000	20	14.0%	0.13986014
5	500 001 - 600 000	12	8.4%	0.08391608
6	600 001 - 700 000	2	1.4%	0.01398601
7	700 001 - 1 000 000	9	6.3%	0.06293706
8	>1 000 000	3	2.1%	0.02097902
97	No answer	41	28.7%	0.28671329
98	Not asked	5308		NA

r5k26

Variable label:	What is your highest level of completed education?
Literal question:	What is your highest level of completed education?
Post-question:	[Spurt respondenten hvis bakgrunnsinformasjon mangler]
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-14]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No completed education	4	5.3%	0.05263158
2	Primary school (first part of compulsory education)	1	1.3%	0.01315789
3	Secondary school (grunnskole, 7-årig folkeskole, framhaldskole, realskole)	2	2.6%	0.02631579
4	County college certificate	0	0.0%	0.00000000
5	6th form college/end of formal schooling, humanities subjects, university preparatory course, 1-year Post-leaving Certificate course (VK2, VG stage 3, gymnas)	14	18.4%	0.18421053
6	6th form college/end of formal schooling, vocational subjects/courses (VK2, VK3, VG stage 3, vocational certificate, journeyman's certificate)	11	14.5%	0.14473684
7	Preliminary course for university/college without credits	1	1.3%	0.01315789
8	Certificate for additional further education (technical college)	1	1.3%	0.01315789
9	University/college, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (2 and 2½ year associate degree)	8	10.5%	0.10526316
10	Completed 3-4 years of college education (Bachelor, BA, B.Sc., teacher's training college, nursing college, nursery teacher, engineer, business economist, etc.)	9	11.8%	0.11842105
11	Completed 3-4 years of university education (Bachelor, BA, B.Sc.)	4	5.3%	0.05263158
12	Completed 5-6 years of college education (Masters, main subject)	4	5.3%	0.05263158
13	Completed 5-6 years of university education (Masters, main subject), longer professional education (Bachelor of Divinity, Bachelor of Psychology, Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Veterinary Medicine, Master of Science, architect, business economist	5	6.6%	0.06578947
14	Researcher (Ph.D)	1	1.3%	0.01315789
15	None of these	0	0.0%	0.00000000
97	No answer	11	14.5%	0.14473684
98	Not asked	5375		NA

r5k27

Variable label:	Marital status
Literal question:	Marital status. Please click whichever alternative is most applicable.
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Never been married, had a partner or legally registered partner	5	7.4%	0.07352941
2	Married	27	39.7%	0.39705882
3	Legally registered partner	0	0.0%	0.00000000
4	Partner	17	25.0%	0.25000000
5	Divorced/separated	4	5.9%	0.05882353
6	Former partner	3	4.4%	0.04411765
7	Former legally registered partner	0	0.0%	0.00000000
8	Widow/widower	5	7.4%	0.07352941
9	Other:	2	2.9%	0.02941176
97	No answer	5	7.4%	0.07352941
98	Not asked	5383		NA

r5k27_9_other

Variable label:	Marital status, other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Marital status
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5k28

Variable label:	Nationality
Literal question:	Nationality: Are you:
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	A Norwegian citizen	54	83.1%	0.83076923
2	A citizen of another country. Please state which	6	9.2%	0.09230769
97	No answer	5	7.7%	0.07692308
98	Not asked	5386		NA

r5k28_2_other

Variable label:	Citizen of another country [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Nationality: Are you:
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5k29

Variable label:	Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
Literal question:	Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No	52	78.8%	0.78787879
2	I have immigrated to Norway	9	13.6%	0.13636364
3	Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway	0	0.0%	0.00000000
4	My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not	0	0.0%	0.00000000
5	My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not	1	1.5%	0.01515152
97	No answer	4	6.1%	0.06060606
98	Not asked	5385		NA

r5k30_1

Variable label:	What country did you live in before you immigrated? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Which country did you live in before you immigrated to Norway?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5k30_2_1

Variable label:	Mothers country of origin [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text:	Which country did your parents (mother, father or both) live in before they immigrated to Norway?
Literal question:	Mother
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5k30_2_2

Variable label:	Fathers country of origin [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text:	Hvilket land bodde dine foreldre (mor, far eller begge) i før de innvandret?
Literal question:	Father
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

r5k40

Variable label:	Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question:	Do you belong to a religion or a religious community?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:5451] [Range:-]

Value	Label	Cases
1	The Church of Norway	0	NaN
2	The Catholic Church	0	NaN
3	An orthodox church (Greek, Russian, other)	0	NaN
4	Other protestant faiths (e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, etc.)	0	NaN
5	Other Christian faiths (e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons)	0	NaN
6	The Mosaic faith (Jewish)	0	NaN
7	Islam (Muslim)	0	NaN
8	Eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism)	0	NaN
9	Other non-Christian religions	0	NaN
10	I don't belong to any religion or religious communities.	0	NaN
97	No answer	0	NaN
98	Not asked	0	NA
Sysmiss		5451	NA

r5k40_recode

Variable label:	Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
Literal question:	Do you belong to a religion or a religious community?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing] [Recoded from source variable r5k40.]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	The Church of Norway	512	61.8%	0.61835749
2	The Catholic Church	15	1.8%	0.01811594
3	Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons)	36	4.3%	0.04347826
4	Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others)	12	1.4%	0.01449275
5	Islam	15	1.8%	0.01811594
6	I don't belong to any religion or religious communities.	176	21.3%	0.21256039
97	No answer	62	7.5%	0.07487923
98	Not asked	4623		NA

r5k41

Variable label:	Attend religious meetings
Literal question:	Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say that you attend religions meetings at the moment?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Daily	2	0.2%	0.002436054
2	More than once a week	17	2.1%	0.020706456
3	Once a week	19	2.3%	0.023142509
4	At least once a month	38	4.6%	0.046285018
5	Only at special festivals	204	24.8%	0.248477467
6	Less often	182	22.2%	0.221680877
7	Never	297	36.2%	0.361753959
97	No answer	62	7.6%	0.075517661
98	Not asked	4630		NA

r5k42

Variable label:	Living with children under 16
Literal question:	Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you, and if so, how many?
Technical description:	[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	None	542	64.3%	0.642941874
2	1	87	10.3%	0.103202847
3	2	104	12.3%	0.123368921
4	3	37	4.4%	0.043890866
5	4	3	0.4%	0.003558719
6	5	2	0.2%	0.002372479
7	6 or more	0	0.0%	0.000000000
97	No answer	68	8.1%	0.080664294
98	Not asked	4608		NA

r5p1

Variable label:	Gender
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Male	2738	50.2%	0.5022932
2	Female	2713	49.8%	0.4977068

r5p2

Variable label:	Region
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Oslo/Akershus	1525	28.0%	0.27976518
2	Østlandet	1322	24.3%	0.24252431
3	Sørlandet	272	5.0%	0.04989910
4	Vestlandet	1440	26.4%	0.26417171
5	Trøndelag	467	8.6%	0.08567235
6	Nord-Norge	425	7.8%	0.07796735

r5p3

Variable label:	County
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	Akershus	668	12.3%	0.122546322
2	Oslo	857	15.7%	0.157218859
3	Østfold	297	5.4%	0.054485416
4	Vestfold	284	5.2%	0.052100532
5	Hedmark	149	2.7%	0.027334434
6	Oppland	157	2.9%	0.028802055
7	Buskerud	277	5.1%	0.050816364
8	Telemark	158	2.9%	0.028985507
9	Vest-Agder	181	3.3%	0.033204917
10	Aust-Agder	91	1.7%	0.016694185
11	Rogaland	485	8.9%	0.088974500
12	Hordaland	630	11.6%	0.115575124
13	Sogn og Fjordane	83	1.5%	0.015226564
14	Møre og Romsdal	242	4.4%	0.044395524
15	Sør-Trøndelag	367	6.7%	0.067327096
16	Nord-Trøndelag	100	1.8%	0.018345258
17	Nordland	216	4.0%	0.039625757
18	Troms	157	2.9%	0.028802055
19	Finmark	52	1.0%	0.009539534

r5p4_1

Variable label:	Highest level of completed education
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No education/elementary school	495	9.1%	0.09080903
2	Upper secondary eduction	1636	30.0%	0.30012842
3	University/university college	3114	57.1%	0.57127133
97	No answer	206	3.8%	0.03779123

r5p4_2

Variable label:	Highest level of completed education
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	No completed education	24	0.4%	0.004402862
2	Primary school (first part of compulsory education)	36	0.7%	0.006604293
3	Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school, secondary school)	435	8.0%	0.079801871
4	College certificate	50	0.9%	0.009172629
5	Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education programme, one-year post admission	695	12.7%	0.127499541
6	Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes (qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination)	684	12.5%	0.125481563
7	Pre-university/college course that does not give credits	75	1.4%	0.013758943
8	Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical college)	182	3.3%	0.033388369
9	University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ year)	514	9.4%	0.094294625
10	Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist, etc.)	1093	20.1%	0.200513667
11	Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor)	369	6.8%	0.067694001
12	Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master)	387	7.1%	0.070996147
13	Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian, engineer, architect, senior business economist)	651	11.9%	0.119427628
14	Research level (Ph.D.)	100	1.8%	0.018345258
15	None of these	143	2.6%	0.026233719
97	No answer	13	0.2%	0.002384884

r5p5_1

Variable label:	Year of birth
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1939 or earlier	215	3.9%	0.03944230
2	1940-1949	940	17.2%	0.17244542
3	1950-1959	1256	23.0%	0.23041644
4	1960-1969	1161	21.3%	0.21298844
5	1970-1979	874	16.0%	0.16033755
6	1980-1989	661	12.1%	0.12126215
7	1990 or later	344	6.3%	0.06310769

r5p5_2

Variable label:	Year of birth
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value	Label	Cases	Percentage
1	1959 or earlier	2411	44.2%	0.44230416
2	1960-1989	2696	49.5%	0.49458815
3	1990 or later	344	6.3%	0.06310769

r5_Weight_1

Variable label:	Weight based on variables P3, P5_2 and P1. See documentation report
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]

r5_Weight_2

Variable label:	Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4_1 and P1. See documentation report
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-11]

r5Weight4

Variable label:	Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1) upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2 and x <= 5).
Technical attributes:	[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5451] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-3]

Codebook - Round 5 - Norwegian Citizen Panel