Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Sveinung Arnesen, Bjarte Folkestad, Endre Tvinnereim, Åsta Dyrnes Nordø,
Mikael Poul Johannesson, Erik Knudsen, Nina Serdarevic
|
Scientific team, University of Bergen and UNI Research Rokkan Centre
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in two waves,
wave 1 and wave 3. In wave 1 4.870 panel members were recruited (see
documentation from wave 1). In wave 3 5.623 members were recruited.
Prior to wave 7 the Norwegian Citizen Panel had 10,179 members. The
sampling procedure of wave and wave 1 is identical. 25 000 individuals
over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the Norwegian National
Population Registry. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name,
c) address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a online questionnaire. Existing members receives
e-mail invitations asking for their participation in the current wave.
New panel members were recruited in multiple steps.
First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters
contained the following information: a) a description of the project, b)
the Citizen Panel’s policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the
anonymity of the participants, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the
participants’ rights to opt of the panel at any time in the future, e)
contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a
unique log-in id and the web address to the panel’s web site and g) the
estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).
Prosepective respondents in the sample that did not register as a panel
member after a certain time period recieved a reminder sent as a post
card
In the second recruitment round all respondents that had not accessed or
completed the survey after receiving both a letter and a post card were
sent a reminder to their mobile phones (depending on whether or not they
were registered with a phone number in the Population Register). A
randomly drawn subset of the gross sample were also contacted via a
telephone call.
The invitation was emailed on the 01st of November 2016.
Three reminders were sent at the following dates: 03rd of November, 08th
of November, and 11th of November. The reminder was sent to those who a)
had not entered the questionnaire, and b) had not completed the
questionnaire. Panel members with registered phone number received the
last of these reminders as a text message. Panel members without
registered phone number received the reminder as an email.
Wave 7 was closed 01st of December.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix). When
calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s
geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These
attributes were included in the sample file we received from the
Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of
education is provided by the respondents when answering the
questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer
this question. Because of this, two different weights have been
calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-103
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 7
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r7Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r7Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r7Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
v-102
|
2020-08-25
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 7
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-24
|
r7k33
|
Corrected
interviewer instruction
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-24
|
r7k34_1
- r7k34_21
|
Questions
were inadvertently given to the wrong sample of respondents. Corrected
documentation
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k33
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k33_9_other
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_3
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_4
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_5
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_6
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_7
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_8
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_9
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_10
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_11
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_12
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_13
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_14
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_15
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_16
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_17
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_18
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_19
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_20
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_21
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-19
|
r7k34_21_other
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 7
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r7p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r7p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-19
|
r7p3
|
Updated the value of 1 respondent.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r7p4_1
|
Corrected values of 23 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r7p4_2
|
Corrected values of 23 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r7_weight_2
|
Corrected values of 23 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-11-28
|
r7k13
|
Removed technical documentation
|
|
NA
|
2017-11-28
|
r7k33
|
Removed technical documentation
|
|
NA
|
2017-11-28
|
r7k33_9_other
|
Removed technical documentation
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-01
|
r7pad6
|
Recoded variables from string to numerics.
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-01
|
r7pad7
|
Recoded variables from string to numerics.
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-01
|
r7pad8
|
Recoded variables from string to numerics.
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-01
|
r7pad14
|
Recoded variables from string to numerics.
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-01
|
r7selexp2
|
Recoded variables from string to numerics.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
r7p4_1
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
r7p4_2
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r7km1a
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r7km1b
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r7km1c
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
|
v-100
|
2016-12-16
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 7
|
|
NA
|
2016-12-15
|
r7municipalsize
|
New variable.
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 7 - v-103-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
4689
|
|
# Variables
|
614
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7u
|
Variable label:
|
Respondent sub-group
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
U1 |
1184 |
25.3% |
0.2525059 |
| 2 |
U2 |
1199 |
25.6% |
0.2557048 |
| 3 |
U3 |
1103 |
23.5% |
0.2352314 |
| 4 |
U4 |
1203 |
25.7% |
0.2565579 |
r7recruited
|
Variable label:
|
Recruitment wave
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Wave 1 |
2190 |
46.7% |
0.4670505 |
| 3 |
Wave 3 |
2499 |
53.3% |
0.5329495 |
r7browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7mobile
|
Variable label:
|
Determines if the respondents uses mobile
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Other |
3396 |
72.4% |
0.7242482 |
| 1 |
Mobile |
1293 |
27.6% |
0.2757518 |
r7deviceResolution
|
Variable label:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7device
|
Variable label:
|
Determines respondents device type.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
3463 |
73.9% |
0.738537001 |
| 2 |
Touch |
1217 |
26.0% |
0.259543613 |
| 3 |
Generic |
9 |
0.2% |
0.001919386 |
r7advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7ktilfreds_1
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Life at the moment
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied
are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Life at the moment?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
1121 |
23.9% |
0.239070164 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2687 |
57.3% |
0.573043293 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
636 |
13.6% |
0.135636596 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
195 |
4.2% |
0.041586692 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
30 |
0.6% |
0.006397953 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
0.4% |
0.004265302 |
r7ktilfreds_2
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Your personal economy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied
are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your personal economy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
820 |
17.5% |
0.17487737 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2616 |
55.8% |
0.55790147 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
787 |
16.8% |
0.16783962 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
317 |
6.8% |
0.06760503 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
83 |
1.8% |
0.01770100 |
| 97 |
No answer |
66 |
1.4% |
0.01407550 |
r7ktilfreds_3
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: The government in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied
are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
183 |
3.9% |
0.03902751 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
1362 |
29.0% |
0.29046705 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1557 |
33.2% |
0.33205374 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
1135 |
24.2% |
0.24205588 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
386 |
8.2% |
0.08232032 |
| 97 |
No answer |
66 |
1.4% |
0.01407550 |
r7ktilfreds_4
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: How democracy works in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied
are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
490 |
10.4% |
0.10449989 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2473 |
52.7% |
0.52740456 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1182 |
25.2% |
0.25207933 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
391 |
8.3% |
0.08338665 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
90 |
1.9% |
0.01919386 |
| 97 |
No answer |
63 |
1.3% |
0.01343570 |
r7k10
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of the economic situation in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
569 |
12.1% |
0.121347835 |
| 2 |
Good |
2592 |
55.3% |
0.552783109 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
922 |
19.7% |
0.196630412 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
318 |
6.8% |
0.067818298 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
212 |
4.5% |
0.045212199 |
| 6 |
Bad |
48 |
1.0% |
0.010236724 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
12 |
0.3% |
0.002559181 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
0.3% |
0.003412241 |
r7k204
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party at parliamentary election tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
201 |
4.3% |
0.042866283 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
1097 |
23.4% |
0.233951802 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
418 |
8.9% |
0.089144807 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
232 |
4.9% |
0.049477501 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
263 |
5.6% |
0.056088718 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
261 |
5.6% |
0.055662188 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
177 |
3.8% |
0.037747921 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
1519 |
32.4% |
0.323949669 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
126 |
2.7% |
0.026871401 |
| 10 |
Would not vote |
152 |
3.2% |
0.032416293 |
| 11 |
Not entitled to vote |
83 |
1.8% |
0.017701002 |
| 12 |
Other: |
124 |
2.6% |
0.026444871 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
0.8% |
0.007677543 |
r7k204_12_other
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party at parliamentary election tomorrow, other
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7k6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Christian Democrats
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
492 |
10.5% |
0.104926424 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
769 |
16.4% |
0.164000853 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1156 |
24.7% |
0.246534442 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1059 |
22.6% |
0.225847729 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
857 |
18.3% |
0.182768181 |
| 6 |
Really like |
224 |
4.8% |
0.047771380 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
43 |
0.9% |
0.009170399 |
| 97 |
No answer |
89 |
1.9% |
0.018980593 |
r7k6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
197 |
4.2% |
0.04201322 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
522 |
11.1% |
0.11132438 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
972 |
20.7% |
0.20729367 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
611 |
13.0% |
0.13030497 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1143 |
24.4% |
0.24376200 |
| 6 |
Really like |
940 |
20.0% |
0.20046918 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
209 |
4.5% |
0.04457240 |
| 97 |
No answer |
95 |
2.0% |
0.02026018 |
r7k6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1222 |
26.1% |
0.26060994 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
925 |
19.7% |
0.19727021 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
721 |
15.4% |
0.15376413 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
460 |
9.8% |
0.09810194 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
712 |
15.2% |
0.15184474 |
| 6 |
Really like |
422 |
9.0% |
0.08999787 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
135 |
2.9% |
0.02879079 |
| 97 |
No answer |
92 |
2.0% |
0.01962039 |
r7k6_4
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
439 |
9.4% |
0.09362337 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
643 |
13.7% |
0.13712945 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1011 |
21.6% |
0.21561100 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1087 |
23.2% |
0.23181915 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1034 |
22.1% |
0.22051610 |
| 6 |
Really like |
326 |
7.0% |
0.06952442 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
53 |
1.1% |
0.01130305 |
| 97 |
No answer |
96 |
2.0% |
0.02047345 |
r7k6_5
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
708 |
15.1% |
0.15099168 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
844 |
18.0% |
0.17999573 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
814 |
17.4% |
0.17359778 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
882 |
18.8% |
0.18809981 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
850 |
18.1% |
0.18127533 |
| 6 |
Really like |
408 |
8.7% |
0.08701216 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
87 |
1.9% |
0.01855406 |
| 97 |
No answer |
96 |
2.0% |
0.02047345 |
r7k6_6
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
264 |
5.6% |
0.05630198 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
559 |
11.9% |
0.11921518 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
964 |
20.6% |
0.20558755 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1497 |
31.9% |
0.31925784 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
959 |
20.5% |
0.20452122 |
| 6 |
Really like |
299 |
6.4% |
0.06376626 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
53 |
1.1% |
0.01130305 |
| 97 |
No answer |
94 |
2.0% |
0.02004692 |
r7k6_7
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
995 |
21.2% |
0.21219876 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
729 |
15.5% |
0.15547025 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
814 |
17.4% |
0.17359778 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
805 |
17.2% |
0.17167840 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
874 |
18.6% |
0.18639369 |
| 6 |
Really like |
320 |
6.8% |
0.06824483 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
64 |
1.4% |
0.01364897 |
| 97 |
No answer |
88 |
1.9% |
0.01876733 |
r7k6_8
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
142 |
3.0% |
0.03028364 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
339 |
7.2% |
0.07229687 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
716 |
15.3% |
0.15269780 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
640 |
13.6% |
0.13648966 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
1357 |
28.9% |
0.28940073 |
| 6 |
Really like |
1167 |
24.9% |
0.24888036 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
247 |
5.3% |
0.05267648 |
| 97 |
No answer |
81 |
1.7% |
0.01727447 |
r7k6_9
|
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the
various political parties in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Intensely dislike |
1097 |
23.4% |
0.23395180 |
| 2 |
Really dislike |
839 |
17.9% |
0.17892941 |
| 3 |
Dislike somewhat |
714 |
15.2% |
0.15227127 |
| 4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1027 |
21.9% |
0.21902325 |
| 5 |
Like somewhat |
617 |
13.2% |
0.13158456 |
| 6 |
Really like |
233 |
5.0% |
0.04969077 |
| 7 |
Intensely like |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01215611 |
| 97 |
No answer |
105 |
2.2% |
0.02239283 |
r7k9_1
|
Variable label:
|
[1] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most
important issue.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7k9_2
|
Variable label:
|
[2] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most
important issue.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7k9_3
|
Variable label:
|
[3] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you
personally?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most
important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most
important issue.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to
privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for
researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University
of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7ocrecsm_mobil
|
Variable label:
|
R7OCRECSM_mobil
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1199] [Invalid:3490]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Does not use smartphone |
885 |
73.8% |
0.7381151 |
| 1 |
Uses smartphone |
314 |
26.2% |
0.2618849 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3490 |
|
NA |
r7ran20
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1199] [Invalid:3490]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
372 |
31.0% |
0.3102585 |
| 2 |
2 |
410 |
34.2% |
0.3419516 |
| 3 |
3 |
417 |
34.8% |
0.3477898 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3490 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm1a1_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran20=1 . ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
104 |
28.0% |
0.27956989 |
| 2 |
2 |
71 |
19.1% |
0.19086022 |
| 3 |
3 |
108 |
29.0% |
0.29032258 |
| 4 |
4 |
64 |
17.2% |
0.17204301 |
| 5 |
Completely |
20 |
5.4% |
0.05376344 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.3% |
0.01344086 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4317 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm1a2_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian background in deciding whether someone
could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran20=1 . ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
225 |
60.5% |
0.60483871 |
| 2 |
2 |
46 |
12.4% |
0.12365591 |
| 3 |
3 |
58 |
15.6% |
0.15591398 |
| 4 |
4 |
29 |
7.8% |
0.07795699 |
| 5 |
Completely |
10 |
2.7% |
0.02688172 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.1% |
0.01075269 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4317 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm1a3_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran20=1 . ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
75 |
20.2% |
0.201612903 |
| 2 |
2 |
77 |
20.7% |
0.206989247 |
| 3 |
3 |
97 |
26.1% |
0.260752688 |
| 4 |
4 |
96 |
25.8% |
0.258064516 |
| 5 |
Completely |
25 |
6.7% |
0.067204301 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005376344 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4317 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm1b1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM1B1_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1b1_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM1B1. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1b2
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian background in deciding whether someone
could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM1B2_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1b2_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian background in deciding whether someone
could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM1B2. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1b3
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM1B3_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1b3_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM1B3. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1c1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM1C1_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1c1_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM1C1. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1c2
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian background in deciding whether someone
could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM1C2_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1c2_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian background in deciding whether someone
could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM1C2. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1c3
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM1C3_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm1c3_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM1C3. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2a1_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran20=1 . ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
123 |
33.1% |
0.33064516 |
| 2 |
2 |
76 |
20.4% |
0.20430108 |
| 3 |
3 |
114 |
30.6% |
0.30645161 |
| 4 |
4 |
33 |
8.9% |
0.08870968 |
| 5 |
Completely |
8 |
2.2% |
0.02150538 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
4.8% |
0.04838710 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4317 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm2a2_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran20=1 . ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
91 |
24.5% |
0.24462366 |
| 2 |
2 |
90 |
24.2% |
0.24193548 |
| 3 |
3 |
136 |
36.6% |
0.36559140 |
| 4 |
4 |
27 |
7.3% |
0.07258065 |
| 5 |
Completely |
7 |
1.9% |
0.01881720 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
5.6% |
0.05645161 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4317 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm2a3_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran20=1 . ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
152 |
40.9% |
0.40860215 |
| 2 |
2 |
81 |
21.8% |
0.21774194 |
| 3 |
3 |
85 |
22.8% |
0.22849462 |
| 4 |
4 |
33 |
8.9% |
0.08870968 |
| 5 |
Completely |
7 |
1.9% |
0.01881720 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
3.8% |
0.03763441 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4317 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm2b1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM2B1_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2b1_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM2B1. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2b2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM2B2_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2b2_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM2B2. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2b3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM2B3_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2b3_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM2B3. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2c1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM2C1_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-49]
|
r7ocrecsm2c1_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM2C1. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2c2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM2C2_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2c2_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM2C2. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2c3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=0. Version for desktop and
tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM2C3_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm2c3_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=3 and R7OCRECSM_mobil=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM2C3. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7mi1
|
Variable label:
|
Personal thoughts when your hear the word “Muslim” [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What are your personal thoughts when you hear the word “Muslim”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write, using your own words, the first thing that comes into your
mind. We are interested in both long and short answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u!=2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u!=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3490] [Invalid:1199]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
1183 |
33.9% |
0.3389685 |
| 2 |
2 |
1163 |
33.3% |
0.3332378 |
| 3 |
3 |
1144 |
32.8% |
0.3277937 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1199 |
|
NA |
r7km1a
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the words “oil and gas” [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the words “oil and gas”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u!=2 and ran1=1. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7km1b
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the word “energy” [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the word “energy”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u!=2 and ran1=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7km1c
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the word “reorganisation” [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the word “reorganisation”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u!=2 and ran1=3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7dv30_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The tax burden should be reduced
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to cutbacks in the
welfare state.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
112 |
2.4% |
0.023885690 |
| 2 |
Agree |
296 |
6.3% |
0.063126466 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
606 |
12.9% |
0.129238644 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
497 |
10.6% |
0.105992749 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
877 |
18.7% |
0.187033483 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1266 |
27.0% |
0.269993602 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1007 |
21.5% |
0.214757944 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005971422 |
r7dv30_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Commercial private schools should be allowed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Commercial private schools should be allowed.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
299 |
6.4% |
0.063766261 |
| 2 |
Agree |
849 |
18.1% |
0.181062060 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
962 |
20.5% |
0.205161015 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
591 |
12.6% |
0.126039667 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
696 |
14.8% |
0.148432502 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
656 |
14.0% |
0.139901898 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
595 |
12.7% |
0.126892728 |
| 97 |
No answer |
41 |
0.9% |
0.008743869 |
r7dv30_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2118 |
45.2% |
0.451695457 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1284 |
27.4% |
0.273832374 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
421 |
9.0% |
0.089784602 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
299 |
6.4% |
0.063766261 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
213 |
4.5% |
0.045425464 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
176 |
3.8% |
0.037534656 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
148 |
3.2% |
0.031563233 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
0.6% |
0.006397953 |
r7dv30_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is better for a country if there is a diversity of
different religions and beliefs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different
religions and beliefs.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
581 |
12.4% |
0.123907016 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1082 |
23.1% |
0.230752826 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1001 |
21.3% |
0.213478354 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
666 |
14.2% |
0.142034549 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
569 |
12.1% |
0.121347835 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
444 |
9.5% |
0.094689699 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
317 |
6.8% |
0.067605033 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
0.6% |
0.006184688 |
r7ran40
|
Variable label:
|
[All respondents randomized. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1199] [Invalid:3490]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
287 |
23.9% |
0.2393661 |
| 2 |
2 |
333 |
27.8% |
0.2777314 |
| 3 |
3 |
287 |
23.9% |
0.2393661 |
| 4 |
4 |
292 |
24.4% |
0.2435363 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3490 |
|
NA |
r7dvh_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and
Vesterålen areas
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the area by Lofoten and
Vesterålen.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Respondents in sub-group u=2: asked if ran40!=4. U2 respondent are
asked R7DVH_1 or R7PILOTKM2. All other respondents are asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1056 |
24.1% |
0.241150948 |
| 2 |
Agree |
745 |
17.0% |
0.170130167 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
466 |
10.6% |
0.106416990 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
765 |
17.5% |
0.174697420 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
499 |
11.4% |
0.113952957 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
517 |
11.8% |
0.118063485 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
311 |
7.1% |
0.071020781 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
0.5% |
0.004567253 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
310 |
|
NA |
r7dvh_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as
Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians
have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
300 |
6.4% |
0.063979527 |
| 2 |
Agree |
765 |
16.3% |
0.163147793 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
822 |
17.5% |
0.175303903 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
472 |
10.1% |
0.100661122 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
950 |
20.3% |
0.202601834 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
810 |
17.3% |
0.172744722 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
539 |
11.5% |
0.114949883 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
0.7% |
0.006611218 |
r7dvh_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Many public activities could be done better and cheaper by
the private sector
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Many public activities could have been carried out both with better
results and at lower cost, if they were operated by the private sector.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
282 |
6.0% |
0.060140755 |
| 2 |
Agree |
715 |
15.2% |
0.152484538 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1148 |
24.5% |
0.244828322 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
608 |
13.0% |
0.129665174 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
683 |
14.6% |
0.145660055 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
779 |
16.6% |
0.166133504 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
437 |
9.3% |
0.093196844 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
0.8% |
0.007890808 |
r7dvh_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: The state should help reduce income disparities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government should contribute to reducing income differences in
society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
855 |
18.2% |
0.182341651 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1380 |
29.4% |
0.294305822 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1168 |
24.9% |
0.249093623 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
493 |
10.5% |
0.105139689 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
429 |
9.1% |
0.091490723 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
249 |
5.3% |
0.053103007 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
80 |
1.7% |
0.017061207 |
| 97 |
No answer |
35 |
0.7% |
0.007464278 |
r7ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[All respondents randomized. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4681] [Invalid:8] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
2294 |
49.0% |
0.4900662 |
| 2 |
2 |
2387 |
51.0% |
0.5099338 |
| Sysmiss |
|
8 |
|
NA |
r7km13_1
|
Variable label:
|
Should put a greater stake into reducing emission in Norway, abroad or
both
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate researchers are of the opinion that emission of greenhouse gases
must be greatly reduced in order to counteract climate change caused by
human activities.
A debate is taking place to establish whether Norway should put a stake
into such reductions in Norway or abroad. Reducing emissions abroad is
often cheaper than in Norway, but measures abroad have also been
criticised because the desired effect has not been achieved.
What do you think?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should the authorities put a greater stake into reducing emissions in
Norway or abroad, or the same amount for both?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran2=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The authorities should concentrate most on reducing emissions in Norway |
521 |
22.7% |
0.22711421 |
| 2 |
The authorities should concentrate most on reducing emissions abroad |
308 |
13.4% |
0.13426330 |
| 3 |
The authorities should concentrate on reducing emissions equally in Norway and
abroad |
1413 |
61.6% |
0.61595466 |
| 97 |
No answer |
52 |
2.3% |
0.02266783 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2395 |
|
NA |
r7km13_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most of the reductions in emissions Norway has committed to
should be carried out abroad
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree or
disagree with that?
|
|
Literal question:
|
“Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has
committed to should be carried out abroad”
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran2=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
120 |
5.0% |
0.050272308 |
| 2 |
Agree |
167 |
7.0% |
0.069962296 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
336 |
14.1% |
0.140762463 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
558 |
23.4% |
0.233766234 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
375 |
15.7% |
0.157100964 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
557 |
23.3% |
0.233347298 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
254 |
10.6% |
0.106409719 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
0.8% |
0.008378718 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2302 |
|
NA |
r7elite_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: We agree on which actions that needs to be completed, but
little is happening because of the authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
We are in agreement regarding most of the actions that need to be
completed in this country, but very little is happening because the
authorities are standing in the way.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
151 |
3.2% |
0.03220303 |
| 2 |
Agree |
431 |
9.2% |
0.09191725 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1200 |
25.6% |
0.25591811 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1035 |
22.1% |
0.22072937 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
713 |
15.2% |
0.15205801 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
938 |
20.0% |
0.20004265 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
150 |
3.2% |
0.03198976 |
| 97 |
No answer |
71 |
1.5% |
0.01514182 |
r7elite_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politicians maintain close contact with the electorate in the
whole of the country
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Most of the professional politicians in Norway maintain close contact
with the electorate in the whole of the country.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
12 |
0.3% |
0.002559181 |
| 2 |
Agree |
269 |
5.7% |
0.057368309 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
808 |
17.2% |
0.172318192 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1033 |
22.0% |
0.220302836 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1193 |
25.4% |
0.254425251 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
991 |
21.1% |
0.211345703 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
319 |
6.8% |
0.068031563 |
| 97 |
No answer |
64 |
1.4% |
0.013648966 |
r7elite_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Many important decisions made by small group without ordinary
people’s knowledge
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
In this country, many important decisions are made by a small group of
people without the ordinary people being told.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
471 |
10.0% |
0.10044786 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1158 |
24.7% |
0.24696097 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1528 |
32.6% |
0.32586906 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
642 |
13.7% |
0.13691619 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
459 |
9.8% |
0.09788868 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
326 |
7.0% |
0.06952442 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
47 |
1.0% |
0.01002346 |
| 97 |
No answer |
58 |
1.2% |
0.01236938 |
r7elite_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Difference between politicians same as between ordinary
people
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The differences amongst politicians are the same as between ordinary
people.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
468 |
10.0% |
0.09980806 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1778 |
37.9% |
0.37918533 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
1042 |
22.2% |
0.22222222 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
589 |
12.6% |
0.12561314 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
446 |
9.5% |
0.09511623 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
247 |
5.3% |
0.05267648 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01215611 |
| 97 |
No answer |
62 |
1.3% |
0.01322244 |
r7ran5
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1195] [Invalid:3494]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
609 |
51.0% |
0.5096234 |
| 2 |
2 |
586 |
49.0% |
0.4903766 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3494 |
|
NA |
r7mi4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Do leaders care mostly for themselves, or do they try to do what they
feel is right?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some are of the opinion that leaders normally care mostly for
themselves. Others are of the opinion that they try their best to do
what they feel is right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran5=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Leaders care greatly for themselves |
28 |
4.6% |
0.04597701 |
| 2 |
Leaders care mostly for themselves |
111 |
18.2% |
0.18226601 |
| 3 |
Leaders care somewhat for themselves |
118 |
19.4% |
0.19376026 |
| 4 |
Neither of these |
69 |
11.3% |
0.11330049 |
| 5 |
Leaders try somewhat to do what is right |
133 |
21.8% |
0.21839080 |
| 6 |
Leaders try mostly to do what is right |
133 |
21.8% |
0.21839080 |
| 7 |
Leaders try greatly to do what is right |
10 |
1.6% |
0.01642036 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4080 |
|
NA |
r7mi4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Do Muslim leaders care mostly for themselves, or do they try to do what
they feel is right?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some are of the opinion that Muslim leaders normally care mostly for
themselves. Others are of the opinion that they try their best to do
what they feel is right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran5=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Muslim leaders care greatly for themselves |
68 |
11.6% |
0.116040956 |
| 2 |
Muslim leaders care mostly for themselves |
109 |
18.6% |
0.186006826 |
| 3 |
Muslim leaders care somewhat for themselves |
56 |
9.6% |
0.095563140 |
| 4 |
Neither of these |
158 |
27.0% |
0.269624573 |
| 5 |
Muslim leaders try somewhat to do what is right |
110 |
18.8% |
0.187713311 |
| 6 |
Muslim leaders try mostly to do what is right |
46 |
7.8% |
0.078498294 |
| 7 |
Muslim leaders try greatly to do what is right |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006825939 |
| 97 |
No answer |
35 |
6.0% |
0.059726962 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4103 |
|
NA |
r7pad10_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Immigrant children of parents that are illegal residents
should be able to remain if parents deported
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, to what extent do you disagree or agree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant children of parents that are illegal residents in Norway
should have the right to remain in the country if the parents are
deported.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
48 |
4.4% |
0.04351768 |
| 2 |
Agree |
150 |
13.6% |
0.13599275 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
222 |
20.1% |
0.20126927 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
186 |
16.9% |
0.16863101 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
169 |
15.3% |
0.15321850 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
214 |
19.4% |
0.19401632 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
94 |
8.5% |
0.08522212 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.8% |
0.01813237 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7pad10_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: If an employer supplies you with a phone, the employer should
have the right to read text-messages/e-mails on the phone
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, to what extent do you disagree or agree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If an employer supplies you with a mobile phone for use in connection
with your employment, the employer should have the right to read all the
text messages or e-mails you send and receive with this phone.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
35 |
3.2% |
0.03173164 |
| 2 |
Agree |
108 |
9.8% |
0.09791478 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
85 |
7.7% |
0.07706256 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
72 |
6.5% |
0.06527652 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
96 |
8.7% |
0.08703536 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
301 |
27.3% |
0.27289211 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
388 |
35.2% |
0.35176791 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
1.6% |
0.01631913 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7pad10_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Not possible to bring neighbour disputes to court before
mediation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, to what extent do you disagree or agree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It should not be possible to bring neighbour disputes (like the height
of trees and fences) to court, without first having tried to resolve the
conflict by mediation.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
422 |
38.3% |
0.38259293 |
| 2 |
Agree |
483 |
43.8% |
0.43789665 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
79 |
7.2% |
0.07162285 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
3.9% |
0.03898459 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
14 |
1.3% |
0.01269266 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
24 |
2.2% |
0.02175884 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
1.5% |
0.01450589 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
2.0% |
0.01994560 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7k15_1
|
Variable label:
|
Can most people be trusted?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Post-question:
|
State your opinion on the scale below. This goes from 0 to 10, where 0
means “Cannot be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be
trusted”.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
68 |
1.5% |
0.01450203 |
| 2 |
1 |
50 |
1.1% |
0.01066325 |
| 3 |
2 |
116 |
2.5% |
0.02473875 |
| 4 |
3 |
242 |
5.2% |
0.05161015 |
| 5 |
4 |
239 |
5.1% |
0.05097036 |
| 6 |
5 |
537 |
11.5% |
0.11452335 |
| 7 |
6 |
506 |
10.8% |
0.10791213 |
| 8 |
7 |
1104 |
23.5% |
0.23544466 |
| 9 |
8 |
973 |
20.8% |
0.20750693 |
| 10 |
9 |
415 |
8.9% |
0.08850501 |
| 11 |
10- Most people can be trusted |
382 |
8.1% |
0.08146726 |
| 97 |
No answer |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01215611 |
r7pad14_version
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly selects a version of the conjunction-experiment. Background
variable conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects the number and combination of news and entertainment
articles.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
4 news articles |
1576 |
33.8% |
0.3382700 |
| 2 |
6 news articles |
1556 |
33.4% |
0.3339772 |
| 3 |
4 entertainment articles and 2 news articles |
1527 |
32.8% |
0.3277527 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_selections
|
Variable label:
|
The number of articles the respondent can select. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects, between 1 and 3, how many news articles the
respondent may choose. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 selection |
1565 |
33.6% |
0.3359090 |
| 2 |
2 selections |
1497 |
32.1% |
0.3213136 |
| 3 |
3 selections |
1597 |
34.3% |
0.3427774 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_likes01
|
Variable label:
|
Dichotomy whether the articles should be listed with endorsements, or
not. Background variable conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly decides whether the articles should be listed with
endorsements, or not. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
No |
2374 |
51.0% |
0.5095514 |
| 1 |
Yes |
2285 |
49.0% |
0.4904486 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_sourcesRan_1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 1. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source for article 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
682 |
14.6% |
0.1463833 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
683 |
14.7% |
0.1465980 |
| 3 |
VG |
655 |
14.1% |
0.1405881 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
675 |
14.5% |
0.1448809 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
660 |
14.2% |
0.1416613 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
668 |
14.3% |
0.1433784 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
636 |
13.7% |
0.1365100 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_sourcesRan_2
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 2. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source for article 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
702 |
15.1% |
0.1506761 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
643 |
13.8% |
0.1380124 |
| 3 |
VG |
680 |
14.6% |
0.1459541 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
688 |
14.8% |
0.1476712 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
620 |
13.3% |
0.1330758 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
670 |
14.4% |
0.1438077 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
656 |
14.1% |
0.1408027 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_sourcesRan_3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 3. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source for article 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
653 |
14.0% |
0.1401588 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
663 |
14.2% |
0.1423052 |
| 3 |
VG |
670 |
14.4% |
0.1438077 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
656 |
14.1% |
0.1408027 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
673 |
14.4% |
0.1444516 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
655 |
14.1% |
0.1405881 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
689 |
14.8% |
0.1478858 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_sourcesRan_4
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 4. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source for article 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
666 |
14.3% |
0.1429491 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
647 |
13.9% |
0.1388710 |
| 3 |
VG |
678 |
14.6% |
0.1455248 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
680 |
14.6% |
0.1459541 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
651 |
14.0% |
0.1397296 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
658 |
14.1% |
0.1412320 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
679 |
14.6% |
0.1457394 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_sourcesRan_5
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 5. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source for article 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3083] [Invalid:1606]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
478 |
15.5% |
0.1550438 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
427 |
13.9% |
0.1385015 |
| 3 |
VG |
432 |
14.0% |
0.1401233 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
417 |
13.5% |
0.1352579 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
443 |
14.4% |
0.1436912 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
433 |
14.0% |
0.1404476 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
453 |
14.7% |
0.1469348 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1606 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_sourcesRan_6
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 6. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Source for article 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3083] [Invalid:1606]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
444 |
14.4% |
0.1440156 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
424 |
13.8% |
0.1375284 |
| 3 |
VG |
447 |
14.5% |
0.1449886 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
474 |
15.4% |
0.1537464 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
441 |
14.3% |
0.1430425 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
441 |
14.3% |
0.1430425 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
412 |
13.4% |
0.1336361 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1606 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_likesRan_1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen endorsement for article 1. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If endorsements are to be listed: endorsement for article 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2285] [Invalid:2404]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 people recommend |
754 |
33.0% |
0.3299781 |
| 2 |
95 people recommend |
248 |
10.9% |
0.1085339 |
| 3 |
98 people recommend |
239 |
10.5% |
0.1045952 |
| 4 |
106 people recommend |
269 |
11.8% |
0.1177243 |
| 5 |
1054 people recommend |
261 |
11.4% |
0.1142232 |
| 6 |
1133 people recommend |
278 |
12.2% |
0.1216630 |
| 7 |
1211 people recommend |
236 |
10.3% |
0.1032823 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2404 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_likesRan_2
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen endorsement for article 2. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If endorsements are to be listed: endorsement for article 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2285] [Invalid:2404]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 people recommend |
751 |
32.9% |
0.3286652 |
| 2 |
95 people recommend |
244 |
10.7% |
0.1067834 |
| 3 |
98 people recommend |
275 |
12.0% |
0.1203501 |
| 4 |
106 people recommend |
245 |
10.7% |
0.1072210 |
| 5 |
1054 people recommend |
256 |
11.2% |
0.1120350 |
| 6 |
1133 people recommend |
235 |
10.3% |
0.1028446 |
| 7 |
1211 people recommend |
279 |
12.2% |
0.1221007 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2404 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_likesRan_3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen endorsement for article 3. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If endorsements are to be listed: endorsement for article 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2285] [Invalid:2404]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 people recommend |
768 |
33.6% |
0.3361050 |
| 2 |
95 people recommend |
274 |
12.0% |
0.1199125 |
| 3 |
98 people recommend |
234 |
10.2% |
0.1024070 |
| 4 |
106 people recommend |
237 |
10.4% |
0.1037199 |
| 5 |
1054 people recommend |
258 |
11.3% |
0.1129103 |
| 6 |
1133 people recommend |
264 |
11.6% |
0.1155361 |
| 7 |
1211 people recommend |
250 |
10.9% |
0.1094092 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2404 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_likesRan_4
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen endorsement for article 4. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If endorsements are to be listed: endorsement for article 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2285] [Invalid:2404]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 people recommend |
719 |
31.5% |
0.3146608 |
| 2 |
95 people recommend |
266 |
11.6% |
0.1164114 |
| 3 |
98 people recommend |
261 |
11.4% |
0.1142232 |
| 4 |
106 people recommend |
270 |
11.8% |
0.1181619 |
| 5 |
1054 people recommend |
243 |
10.6% |
0.1063457 |
| 6 |
1133 people recommend |
250 |
10.9% |
0.1094092 |
| 7 |
1211 people recommend |
276 |
12.1% |
0.1207877 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2404 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_likesRan_5
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen endorsement for article 5. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If endorsements are to be listed: endorsement for article 5]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1514] [Invalid:3175]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 people recommend |
497 |
32.8% |
0.3282695 |
| 2 |
95 people recommend |
167 |
11.0% |
0.1103038 |
| 3 |
98 people recommend |
174 |
11.5% |
0.1149273 |
| 4 |
106 people recommend |
175 |
11.6% |
0.1155878 |
| 5 |
1054 people recommend |
158 |
10.4% |
0.1043593 |
| 6 |
1133 people recommend |
168 |
11.1% |
0.1109643 |
| 7 |
1211 people recommend |
175 |
11.6% |
0.1155878 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3175 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_likesRan_6
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen endorsement for article 6. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If endorsements are to be listed: endorsement for article 6]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1514] [Invalid:3175]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 people recommend |
511 |
33.8% |
0.33751651 |
| 2 |
95 people recommend |
164 |
10.8% |
0.10832232 |
| 3 |
98 people recommend |
171 |
11.3% |
0.11294584 |
| 4 |
106 people recommend |
188 |
12.4% |
0.12417437 |
| 5 |
1054 people recommend |
167 |
11.0% |
0.11030383 |
| 6 |
1133 people recommend |
169 |
11.2% |
0.11162483 |
| 7 |
1211 people recommend |
144 |
9.5% |
0.09511229 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3175 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_headlinesRan_1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen headline for article 1. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.Background variable conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores a randomly selected news or entertainment article from a
population of 1296 news articles and 36 entertainment articles.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:7-1476]
|
r7pad14_headlinesRan_2
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen headline for article 2. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.Background variable conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores a randomly selected news or entertainment article from a
population of 1296 news articles and 36 entertainment articles.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:7-1476]
|
r7pad14_headlinesRan_3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen headline for article 3. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.Background variable conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores a randomly selected news or entertainment article from a
population of 1296 news articles and 36 entertainment articles.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:7-1476]
|
r7pad14_headlinesRan_4
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen headline for article 4. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.Background variable conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores a randomly selected news or entertainment article from a
population of 1296 news articles and 36 entertainment articles.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:7-1476]
|
r7pad14_headlinesRan_5
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen headline for article 5. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.Background variable conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores a randomly selected news or entertainment article from a
population of 1296 news articles and 36 entertainment articles.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3083] [Invalid:1606]
[Range:7-1476]
|
r7pad14_headlinesRan_6
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen headline for article 6. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.Background variable conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores a randomly selected news or entertainment article from a
population of 1296 news articles and 36 entertainment articles.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3083] [Invalid:1606]
[Range:7-1476]
|
r7selexp2_selections
|
Variable label:
|
The number of articles the respondent can select. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects, between 1 and 3, how many news articles the
respondent may choose. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 selection |
1516 |
32.5% |
0.3253917 |
| 2 |
2 selections |
1566 |
33.6% |
0.3361236 |
| 3 |
3 selections |
1577 |
33.8% |
0.3384847 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7selexp2_sources01
|
Variable label:
|
Dichotomy whether the articles should be listed with sources, or not.
Background variable conjunction experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly decides whether the articles should be listed with source or
not. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
No |
2339 |
50.2% |
0.5020391 |
| 1 |
Yes |
2320 |
49.8% |
0.4979609 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7selexp2_valanceandparty
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly decides whether the article headlines should appear with party
and valence, or any combination of the two. Background variable
conjunction experiment R7selexp2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly decides whether the respondent will be exposed to valance and
party, or any combination of the two. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
With party and valence |
1184 |
25.4% |
0.2541318 |
| 2 |
With party, without valence |
1195 |
25.6% |
0.2564928 |
| 3 |
Without party, with valence |
1118 |
24.0% |
0.2399657 |
| 4 |
Without party and valence |
1162 |
24.9% |
0.2494097 |
| Sysmiss |
|
30 |
|
NA |
r7selexp2_sourcesRan_1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 1. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If sources are to be listed: source for article 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2320] [Invalid:2369]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
327 |
14.1% |
0.1409483 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
358 |
15.4% |
0.1543103 |
| 3 |
VG |
359 |
15.5% |
0.1547414 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
307 |
13.2% |
0.1323276 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
326 |
14.1% |
0.1405172 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
302 |
13.0% |
0.1301724 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
341 |
14.7% |
0.1469828 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2369 |
|
NA |
r7selexp2_sourcesRan_2
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 2. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If sources are to be listed: source for article 2]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2320] [Invalid:2369]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
326 |
14.1% |
0.1405172 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
350 |
15.1% |
0.1508621 |
| 3 |
VG |
328 |
14.1% |
0.1413793 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
324 |
14.0% |
0.1396552 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
317 |
13.7% |
0.1366379 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
323 |
13.9% |
0.1392241 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
352 |
15.2% |
0.1517241 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2369 |
|
NA |
r7selexp2_sourcesRan_3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 3. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If sources are to be listed: source for article 3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2320] [Invalid:2369]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
340 |
14.7% |
0.1465517 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
350 |
15.1% |
0.1508621 |
| 3 |
VG |
327 |
14.1% |
0.1409483 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
307 |
13.2% |
0.1323276 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
313 |
13.5% |
0.1349138 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
344 |
14.8% |
0.1482759 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
339 |
14.6% |
0.1461207 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2369 |
|
NA |
r7selexp2_sourcesRan_4
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen source for article 4. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[If sources are to be listed: source for article 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2320] [Invalid:2369]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
316 |
13.6% |
0.1362069 |
| 2 |
TV2 |
363 |
15.6% |
0.1564655 |
| 3 |
VG |
316 |
13.6% |
0.1362069 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
351 |
15.1% |
0.1512931 |
| 5 |
Aftenposten |
302 |
13.0% |
0.1301724 |
| 6 |
Klassekampen |
326 |
14.1% |
0.1405172 |
| 7 |
Dagens Næringsliv |
346 |
14.9% |
0.1491379 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2369 |
|
NA |
r7selexp2_headlinesRan_1
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen headline for article 1. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores a randomly selected news article from a large population of
articles.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-1439]
|
r7selexp2_headlinesRan_2
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen headline for article 2. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores a randomly selected news article from a large population of
articles.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-1440]
|
r7selexp2_headlinesRan_3
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen headline for article 3. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores a randomly selected news article from a large population of
articles.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-1440]
|
r7selexp2_headlinesRan_4
|
Variable label:
|
Randomly chosen headline for article 4. Background variable conjunction
experiment R7PAD14.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores a randomly selected news article from a large population of
articles.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4659] [Invalid:30]
[Range:1-1440]
|
r7selexp_order
|
Variable label:
|
The order of which r7pad14 and r7selexp is asked. The order is
randomized.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores the order of which R7PAD14 and R7SELEXP2 is asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4647] [Invalid:42]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
R7PAD14,R7SELEXP2 |
2330 |
50.1% |
0.5013988 |
| 2 |
R7SELEXP2,R7PAD14 |
2317 |
49.9% |
0.4986012 |
| Sysmiss |
|
42 |
|
NA |
r7pad14_4rows_1
|
Variable label:
|
Article 1. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3 articles], which
[article /articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R7PAD14_version=1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are
exposed of 4 random news articles. The articles have a set of randomly
drawn characteristics. R7PAD14_version randomly decides whether the
respondent should be exposed of 4 articles or 6 articles. The order of
which R7PAD14 and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is randomized. See
R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
743 |
47.1% |
0.471446701 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001269036 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3113 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
831 |
52.7% |
0.527284264 |
r7pad14_4rows_2
|
Variable label:
|
Article 2. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3 articles], which
[article /articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R7PAD14_version=1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are
exposed of 4 random news articles. The articles have a set of randomly
drawn characteristics. R7PAD14_version randomly decides whether the
respondent should be exposed of 4 articles or 6 articles. The order of
which R7PAD14 and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is randomized. See
R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
771 |
48.9% |
0.489213198 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001269036 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3113 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
803 |
51.0% |
0.509517766 |
r7pad14_4rows_3
|
Variable label:
|
Article 3. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3 articles], which
[article /articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R7PAD14_version=1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are
exposed of 4 random news articles. The articles have a set of randomly
drawn characteristics. R7PAD14_version randomly decides whether the
respondent should be exposed of 4 articles or 6 articles. The order of
which R7PAD14 and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is randomized. See
R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
761 |
48.3% |
0.482868020 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001269036 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3113 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
813 |
51.6% |
0.515862944 |
r7pad14_4rows_4
|
Variable label:
|
Article 4. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3 articles], which
[article /articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R7PAD14_version=1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are
exposed of 4 random news articles. The articles have a set of randomly
drawn characteristics. R7PAD14_version randomly decides whether the
respondent should be exposed of 4 articles or 6 articles. The order of
which R7PAD14 and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is randomized. See
R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
806 |
51.1% |
0.511421320 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001269036 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3113 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
768 |
48.7% |
0.487309645 |
r7pad14_6rows_1
|
Variable label:
|
Article 1. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3 articles], which
[article /articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R7PAD14_version>1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents
are exposed to a set of 6 random news and entertainment articles. The
articles have a set of randomly drawn characteristics. R7PAD14_version
randomly decides whether the respondent should be exposed of 4 articles
or 6 articles. The order of which R7PAD14 and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is
randomized. See R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
1036 |
33.6% |
0.3364729 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1610 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2043 |
66.4% |
0.6635271 |
r7pad14_6rows_2
|
Variable label:
|
Article 2. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3 articles], which
[article /articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R7PAD14_version>1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents
are exposed to a set of 6 random news and entertainment articles. The
articles have a set of randomly drawn characteristics. R7PAD14_version
randomly decides whether the respondent should be exposed of 4 articles
or 6 articles. The order of which R7PAD14 and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is
randomized. See R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
967 |
31.4% |
0.313655530 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001297438 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1606 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2112 |
68.5% |
0.685047032 |
r7pad14_6rows_3
|
Variable label:
|
Article 3. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3 articles], which
[article /articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R7PAD14_version>1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents
are exposed to a set of 6 random news and entertainment articles. The
articles have a set of randomly drawn characteristics. R7PAD14_version
randomly decides whether the respondent should be exposed of 4 articles
or 6 articles. The order of which R7PAD14 and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is
randomized. See R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
1001 |
32.5% |
0.324683750 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001297438 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1606 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2078 |
67.4% |
0.674018813 |
r7pad14_6rows_4
|
Variable label:
|
Article 4. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3 articles], which
[article /articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R7PAD14_version>1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents
are exposed to a set of 6 random news and entertainment articles. The
articles have a set of randomly drawn characteristics. R7PAD14_version
randomly decides whether the respondent should be exposed of 4 articles
or 6 articles. The order of which R7PAD14 and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is
randomized. See R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
1000 |
32.4% |
0.324359390 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001297438 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1606 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2079 |
67.4% |
0.674343172 |
r7pad14_6rows_5
|
Variable label:
|
Article 5. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3 articles], which
[article /articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R7PAD14_version>1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents
are exposed to a set of 6 random news and entertainment articles. The
articles have a set of randomly drawn characteristics. R7PAD14_version
randomly decides whether the respondent should be exposed of 4 articles
or 6 articles. The order of which R7PAD14 and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is
randomized. See R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
932 |
30.2% |
0.302302952 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001297438 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1606 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2147 |
69.6% |
0.696399611 |
r7pad14_6rows_6
|
Variable label:
|
Article 6. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3 articles], which
[article /articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R7PAD14_version>1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents
are exposed to a set of 6 random news and entertainment articles. The
articles have a set of randomly drawn characteristics. R7PAD14_version
randomly decides whether the respondent should be exposed of 4 articles
or 6 articles. The order of which R7PAD14 and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is
randomized. See R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
1013 |
32.9% |
0.328576062 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001297438 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1606 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2066 |
67.0% |
0.670126500 |
r7selexp2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Article 1. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3articles], which [article
/articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are
exposed of a set of random news and entertainment articles. The articles
have a set of randomly drawn characteristics. The order of which R7PAD14
and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is randomized. See R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
2236 |
47.7% |
0.476860738 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
0.8% |
0.008104073 |
| 0 |
|
2415 |
51.5% |
0.515035189 |
r7selexp2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Article 2. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3articles], which [article
/articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are
exposed of a set of random news and entertainment articles. The articles
have a set of randomly drawn characteristics. The order of which R7PAD14
and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is randomized. See R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
2287 |
48.8% |
0.487737257 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
0.8% |
0.008104073 |
| 0 |
|
2364 |
50.4% |
0.504158669 |
r7selexp2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Article 3. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3articles], which [article
/articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are
exposed of a set of random news and entertainment articles. The articles
have a set of randomly drawn characteristics. The order of which R7PAD14
and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is randomized. See R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
2256 |
48.1% |
0.481126040 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
0.8% |
0.008104073 |
| 0 |
|
2395 |
51.1% |
0.510769887 |
r7selexp2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Article 4. List of randomly selected articles by which the respondent
has to pick which ones to read. Conjunction experiment.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study what media items people read. Below you will find some
imaginary items similar to those you may find in Norwegian online
newspapers. Please read all the headlines carefully and imagine that
this is real.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to read [1 article /2 articles /3articles], which [article
/articles] would you have preferred to spend your time by?
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen articles. See background
variables]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are
exposed of a set of random news and entertainment articles. The articles
have a set of randomly drawn characteristics. The order of which R7PAD14
and R7SELEXP2 is asked, is randomized. See R7SELEXP_order.]
[Contact Sveinung Arnesen (Sveinung.Arnesen@uib.no) or Mikael Johannesson (Mikael.Johannesson@uib.no) for questions and complete
documentation]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Article chosen by respondent |
2230 |
47.6% |
0.475581147 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
0.8% |
0.008104073 |
| 0 |
|
2421 |
51.6% |
0.516314779 |
r7Error_selexp
|
Variable label:
|
36 respondents experienced an error in experiment r7pad14 and r7selexp2.
The error stopped them from progressing in the questionnaire.
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Did not experience an error |
4653 |
99.2% |
0.992322457 |
| 1 |
Did experience an error |
36 |
0.8% |
0.007677543 |
r7pad6_age_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Age. Background variable for r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected age for profile 1 in
conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
22 years |
162 |
14.8% |
0.1483516 |
| 2 |
30 years |
153 |
14.0% |
0.1401099 |
| 3 |
40 years |
150 |
13.7% |
0.1373626 |
| 4 |
50 years |
135 |
12.4% |
0.1236264 |
| 5 |
60 years |
169 |
15.5% |
0.1547619 |
| 6 |
70 years |
169 |
15.5% |
0.1547619 |
| 7 |
80 years |
154 |
14.1% |
0.1410256 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_gender_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Gender. Background variable for r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected sex for profile 1 in
conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
553 |
50.6% |
0.5064103 |
| 2 |
Female |
539 |
49.4% |
0.4935897 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_location_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Location. Background variable for r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected geographical region for
profile 1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
168 |
15.4% |
0.1538462 |
| 2 |
Eastern Norway |
195 |
17.9% |
0.1785714 |
| 3 |
Southern Norway |
186 |
17.0% |
0.1703297 |
| 4 |
Western Norway |
186 |
17.0% |
0.1703297 |
| 5 |
Central Norway |
168 |
15.4% |
0.1538462 |
| 6 |
Northern Norway |
189 |
17.3% |
0.1730769 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_martialstatus_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Martial status. Background variable for
r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected relationship status for
profile 1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Live alone |
358 |
32.8% |
0.3278388 |
| 2 |
Cohabitant |
398 |
36.4% |
0.3644689 |
| 3 |
Married |
336 |
30.8% |
0.3076923 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_education_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Education. Background variable for r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected education level for
profile 1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Primary education |
258 |
23.6% |
0.2362637 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
280 |
25.6% |
0.2564103 |
| 3 |
University degree |
275 |
25.2% |
0.2518315 |
| 4 |
Doctorate |
279 |
25.5% |
0.2554945 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_religion_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Religion. Background variable for r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected religious affiliation
for profile 1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
349 |
32.0% |
0.3195971 |
| 2 |
Christianity |
383 |
35.1% |
0.3507326 |
| 3 |
Islam |
360 |
33.0% |
0.3296703 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_workexp_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Work experience. Background variable for
r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected profession for profile
1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
186 |
17.0% |
0.1703297 |
| 2 |
Care worker |
208 |
19.0% |
0.1904762 |
| 3 |
Farmer |
175 |
16.0% |
0.1602564 |
| 4 |
Oil worker |
183 |
16.8% |
0.1675824 |
| 5 |
Self employed |
168 |
15.4% |
0.1538462 |
| 6 |
IT consultant |
172 |
15.8% |
0.1575092 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_age_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Age. Background variable for r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected age for profile 2 in
conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
22 years |
147 |
13.5% |
0.1346154 |
| 2 |
30 years |
159 |
14.6% |
0.1456044 |
| 3 |
40 years |
146 |
13.4% |
0.1336996 |
| 4 |
50 years |
165 |
15.1% |
0.1510989 |
| 5 |
60 years |
166 |
15.2% |
0.1520147 |
| 6 |
70 years |
155 |
14.2% |
0.1419414 |
| 7 |
80 years |
154 |
14.1% |
0.1410256 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_gender_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Gender. Background variable for r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected sex for profile 2 in
conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
543 |
49.7% |
0.4972527 |
| 2 |
Female |
549 |
50.3% |
0.5027473 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_location_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Location. Background variable for r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected geographical region for
profile 2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
187 |
17.1% |
0.1712454 |
| 2 |
Eastern Norway |
181 |
16.6% |
0.1657509 |
| 3 |
Southern Norway |
180 |
16.5% |
0.1648352 |
| 4 |
Western Norway |
171 |
15.7% |
0.1565934 |
| 5 |
Central Norway |
190 |
17.4% |
0.1739927 |
| 6 |
Northern Norway |
183 |
16.8% |
0.1675824 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_martialstatus_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Marital status. Background variable for
r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected relationship status for
profile 2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Live alone |
380 |
34.8% |
0.3479853 |
| 2 |
Cohabitant |
337 |
30.9% |
0.3086081 |
| 3 |
Married |
375 |
34.3% |
0.3434066 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_education_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Education. Background variable for r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected education level for
profile 2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Primary education |
276 |
25.3% |
0.2527473 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
283 |
25.9% |
0.2591575 |
| 3 |
University degree |
263 |
24.1% |
0.2408425 |
| 4 |
Doctorate |
270 |
24.7% |
0.2472527 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_religion_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Religion. Background variable for r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected religious affiliation
for profile 2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
345 |
31.6% |
0.3159341 |
| 2 |
Christianity |
367 |
33.6% |
0.3360806 |
| 3 |
Islam |
380 |
34.8% |
0.3479853 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6_workexp_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Work experience. Background variable for
r7pad6.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected profession for profile
2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
165 |
15.1% |
0.1510989 |
| 2 |
Care worker |
194 |
17.8% |
0.1776557 |
| 3 |
Farmer |
184 |
16.8% |
0.1684982 |
| 4 |
Oil worker |
175 |
16.0% |
0.1602564 |
| 5 |
Self employed |
183 |
16.8% |
0.1675824 |
| 6 |
IT consultant |
191 |
17.5% |
0.1749084 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_age_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Age. Background variable for r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected age for profile 1 in
conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
22 years |
149 |
13.6% |
0.1364469 |
| 2 |
30 years |
159 |
14.6% |
0.1456044 |
| 3 |
40 years |
147 |
13.5% |
0.1346154 |
| 4 |
50 years |
188 |
17.2% |
0.1721612 |
| 5 |
60 years |
165 |
15.1% |
0.1510989 |
| 6 |
70 years |
130 |
11.9% |
0.1190476 |
| 7 |
80 years |
154 |
14.1% |
0.1410256 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_gender_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Gender. Background variable for r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected sex for profile 1 in
conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
564 |
51.6% |
0.5164835 |
| 2 |
Female |
528 |
48.4% |
0.4835165 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_location_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Location. Background variable for r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected geographical region for
profile 1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
195 |
17.9% |
0.1785714 |
| 2 |
Eastern Norway |
188 |
17.2% |
0.1721612 |
| 3 |
Southern Norway |
174 |
15.9% |
0.1593407 |
| 4 |
Western Norway |
178 |
16.3% |
0.1630037 |
| 5 |
Central Norway |
161 |
14.7% |
0.1474359 |
| 6 |
Northern Norway |
196 |
17.9% |
0.1794872 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_martialstatus_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Martial status. Background variable for
r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected relationship status for
profile 1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Live alone |
368 |
33.7% |
0.3369963 |
| 2 |
Cohabitant |
344 |
31.5% |
0.3150183 |
| 3 |
Married |
380 |
34.8% |
0.3479853 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_education_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Education. Background variable for r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected education level for
profile 1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Primary education |
256 |
23.4% |
0.2344322 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
293 |
26.8% |
0.2683150 |
| 3 |
University degree |
281 |
25.7% |
0.2573260 |
| 4 |
Doctorate |
262 |
24.0% |
0.2399267 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_religion_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Religion. Background variable for r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected religious affiliation
for profile 1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
368 |
33.7% |
0.3369963 |
| 2 |
Christianity |
348 |
31.9% |
0.3186813 |
| 3 |
Islam |
376 |
34.4% |
0.3443223 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_workexp_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Work experience. Background variable for
r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected profession for profile
1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
166 |
15.2% |
0.1520147 |
| 2 |
Care worker |
183 |
16.8% |
0.1675824 |
| 3 |
Farmer |
189 |
17.3% |
0.1730769 |
| 4 |
Oil worker |
176 |
16.1% |
0.1611722 |
| 5 |
Self employed |
207 |
19.0% |
0.1895604 |
| 6 |
IT consultant |
171 |
15.7% |
0.1565934 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_age_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Age. Background variable for r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected age for profile 2 in
conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
22 years |
164 |
15.0% |
0.1501832 |
| 2 |
30 years |
153 |
14.0% |
0.1401099 |
| 3 |
40 years |
166 |
15.2% |
0.1520147 |
| 4 |
50 years |
141 |
12.9% |
0.1291209 |
| 5 |
60 years |
149 |
13.6% |
0.1364469 |
| 6 |
70 years |
157 |
14.4% |
0.1437729 |
| 7 |
80 years |
162 |
14.8% |
0.1483516 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_gender_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Gender. Background variable for r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected sex for profile 2 in
conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
539 |
49.4% |
0.4935897 |
| 2 |
Female |
553 |
50.6% |
0.5064103 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_location_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Location. Background variable for r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected geographical region for
profile 2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
174 |
15.9% |
0.1593407 |
| 2 |
Eastern Norway |
189 |
17.3% |
0.1730769 |
| 3 |
Southern Norway |
177 |
16.2% |
0.1620879 |
| 4 |
Western Norway |
163 |
14.9% |
0.1492674 |
| 5 |
Central Norway |
182 |
16.7% |
0.1666667 |
| 6 |
Northern Norway |
207 |
19.0% |
0.1895604 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_martialstatus_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Martial status. Background variable for
r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected relationship status for
profile 2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Live alone |
361 |
33.1% |
0.3305861 |
| 2 |
Cohabitant |
367 |
33.6% |
0.3360806 |
| 3 |
Married |
364 |
33.3% |
0.3333333 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_education_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Education. Background variable for r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected education level for
profile 2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Primary education |
274 |
25.1% |
0.2509158 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
290 |
26.6% |
0.2655678 |
| 3 |
University degree |
301 |
27.6% |
0.2756410 |
| 4 |
Doctorate |
227 |
20.8% |
0.2078755 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_religion_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Religion. Background variable for r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected religious affiliation
for profile 2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
358 |
32.8% |
0.3278388 |
| 2 |
Christianity |
377 |
34.5% |
0.3452381 |
| 3 |
Islam |
357 |
32.7% |
0.3269231 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad7_workexp_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Work experience. Background variable for
r7pad7.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected profession for profile
2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
158 |
14.5% |
0.1446886 |
| 2 |
Care worker |
179 |
16.4% |
0.1639194 |
| 3 |
Farmer |
163 |
14.9% |
0.1492674 |
| 4 |
Oil worker |
207 |
19.0% |
0.1895604 |
| 5 |
Self employed |
197 |
18.0% |
0.1804029 |
| 6 |
IT consultant |
188 |
17.2% |
0.1721612 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_age_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Age. Background variable for r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected age for profile 1 in
conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
22 years |
141 |
12.9% |
0.1291209 |
| 2 |
30 years |
176 |
16.1% |
0.1611722 |
| 3 |
40 years |
133 |
12.2% |
0.1217949 |
| 4 |
50 years |
146 |
13.4% |
0.1336996 |
| 5 |
60 years |
162 |
14.8% |
0.1483516 |
| 6 |
70 years |
177 |
16.2% |
0.1620879 |
| 7 |
80 years |
157 |
14.4% |
0.1437729 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_gender_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Gender. Background variable for r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected sex for profile 1 in
conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
528 |
48.4% |
0.4835165 |
| 2 |
Female |
564 |
51.6% |
0.5164835 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_location_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Location. Background variable for r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected geographical region for
profile 1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
165 |
15.1% |
0.1510989 |
| 2 |
Eastern Norway |
182 |
16.7% |
0.1666667 |
| 3 |
Southern Norway |
193 |
17.7% |
0.1767399 |
| 4 |
Western Norway |
164 |
15.0% |
0.1501832 |
| 5 |
Central Norway |
199 |
18.2% |
0.1822344 |
| 6 |
Northern Norway |
189 |
17.3% |
0.1730769 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_martialstatus_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Martial status. Background variable for
r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected relationship status for
profile 1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Live alone |
383 |
35.1% |
0.3507326 |
| 2 |
Cohabitant |
356 |
32.6% |
0.3260073 |
| 3 |
Married |
353 |
32.3% |
0.3232601 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_education_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Education. Background variable for r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected education level for
profile 1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Primary education |
303 |
27.7% |
0.2774725 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
264 |
24.2% |
0.2417582 |
| 3 |
University degree |
257 |
23.5% |
0.2353480 |
| 4 |
Doctorate |
268 |
24.5% |
0.2454212 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_religion_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Religion. Background variable for r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected religious affiliation
for profile 1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
346 |
31.7% |
0.3168498 |
| 2 |
Christianity |
369 |
33.8% |
0.3379121 |
| 3 |
Islam |
377 |
34.5% |
0.3452381 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_workexp_1
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 1: Work experience. Background variable for
r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected profession for profile
1 in conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
180 |
16.5% |
0.1648352 |
| 2 |
Care worker |
164 |
15.0% |
0.1501832 |
| 3 |
Farmer |
180 |
16.5% |
0.1648352 |
| 4 |
Oil worker |
176 |
16.1% |
0.1611722 |
| 5 |
Self employed |
182 |
16.7% |
0.1666667 |
| 6 |
IT consultant |
210 |
19.2% |
0.1923077 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_age_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Age. Background variable for r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected age for profile 2 in
conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
22 years |
141 |
12.9% |
0.1291209 |
| 2 |
30 years |
156 |
14.3% |
0.1428571 |
| 3 |
40 years |
146 |
13.4% |
0.1336996 |
| 4 |
50 years |
158 |
14.5% |
0.1446886 |
| 5 |
60 years |
147 |
13.5% |
0.1346154 |
| 6 |
70 years |
164 |
15.0% |
0.1501832 |
| 7 |
80 years |
180 |
16.5% |
0.1648352 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_gender_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Gender. Background variable for r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected sex for profile 2 in
conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
542 |
49.6% |
0.496337 |
| 2 |
Female |
550 |
50.4% |
0.503663 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_location_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Location. Background variable for r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected geographical region for
profile 2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
163 |
14.9% |
0.1492674 |
| 2 |
Eastern Norway |
200 |
18.3% |
0.1831502 |
| 3 |
Southern Norway |
192 |
17.6% |
0.1758242 |
| 4 |
Western Norway |
203 |
18.6% |
0.1858974 |
| 5 |
Central Norway |
179 |
16.4% |
0.1639194 |
| 6 |
Northern Norway |
155 |
14.2% |
0.1419414 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_martialstatus_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Marital status. Background variable for
r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected relationship status for
profile 2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Live alone |
376 |
34.4% |
0.3443223 |
| 2 |
Cohabitant |
361 |
33.1% |
0.3305861 |
| 3 |
Married |
355 |
32.5% |
0.3250916 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_education_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Education. Background variable for r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected education level for
profile 2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Primary education |
259 |
23.7% |
0.2371795 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
280 |
25.6% |
0.2564103 |
| 3 |
University degree |
283 |
25.9% |
0.2591575 |
| 4 |
Doctorate |
270 |
24.7% |
0.2472527 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_religion_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Religion. Background variable for r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected religious affiliation
for profile 2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
349 |
32.0% |
0.3195971 |
| 2 |
Christianity |
350 |
32.1% |
0.3205128 |
| 3 |
Islam |
393 |
36.0% |
0.3598901 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad8_workexp_2
|
Variable label:
|
Characteristic for profile 2: Work experience. Background variable for
r7pad8.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores a randomly selected profession for profile
2 in conjunction experiment R7PAD8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
173 |
15.8% |
0.1584249 |
| 2 |
Care worker |
178 |
16.3% |
0.1630037 |
| 3 |
Farmer |
190 |
17.4% |
0.1739927 |
| 4 |
Oil worker |
175 |
16.0% |
0.1602564 |
| 5 |
Self employed |
178 |
16.3% |
0.1630037 |
| 6 |
IT consultant |
198 |
18.1% |
0.1813187 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7ran34
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1092] [Invalid:3597]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
559 |
51.2% |
0.5119048 |
| 2 |
2 |
533 |
48.8% |
0.4880952 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3597 |
|
NA |
r7pad6a
|
Variable label:
|
Attitudes related to background: Persons, “The government should
contribute towards reducing income differences in society”
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have differing political opinions, and sometimes these
opinions are related to their background. Below we have made up two
imagined persons of different background. We wish to know which of these
you think will be mostly in agreement with the statement below.
Please choose the person you believe would be most in agreement with the
following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
“The government should contribute towards reducing income differences
in society.”
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen person characteristics. See
background variables.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran34=1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are asked
to choose between profiles of two persons, that randomly differs in
characteristics, and determine which of the profiles that are most
likely to agree with a given statement.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Person 1 |
290 |
51.9% |
0.51878354 |
| 2 |
Person 2 |
259 |
46.3% |
0.46332737 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.8% |
0.01788909 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4130 |
|
NA |
r7pad6b
|
Variable label:
|
Attitudes related to background: Politicians, “The government should
contribute towards reducing income differences in society”
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have differing political opinions, and sometimes these
opinions are related to their background. Below we have made up two
imagined politicians of different background. We wish to know which of
these you think will be mostly in agreement with the statement
below.
Please choose the person you believe would be most in agreement with the
following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
“The government should contribute towards reducing income differences
in society.”
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen person characteristics. See
background variables.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran34=2. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are asked
to choose between two profiles of political representatives, that
randomly differs in characteristics, and determine which of the profiles
that are most likely to agree with a given statement.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Politician 1 |
264 |
49.5% |
0.49530957 |
| 2 |
Politician 2 |
256 |
48.0% |
0.48030019 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
2.4% |
0.02439024 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4156 |
|
NA |
r7pad7a
|
Variable label:
|
Attitudes related to background: Persons, “Refugees should have the same
rights to social assistance as Norwegians have, even if they are not
Norwegian citizens”
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have differing political opinions, and sometimes these
opinions are related to their background. Below we have made up two
imagined persons of different background. We wish to know which of these
you think will be mostly in agreement with the statement below.
Please choose the person you believe would be most in agreement with the
following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
“Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as
Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.”
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen person characteristics. See
background variables.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran34=1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are asked
to choose between profiles of two persons, that randomly differs in
characteristics, and determine which of the profiles that are most
likely to agree with a given statement.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Person 1 |
285 |
51.0% |
0.50983900 |
| 2 |
Person 2 |
262 |
46.9% |
0.46869410 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.1% |
0.02146691 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4130 |
|
NA |
r7pad7b
|
Variable label:
|
Attitudes related to background: Politicians, “Refugees should have the
same rights to social assistance as Norwegians have, even if they are
not Norwegian citizens”
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have differing political opinions, and sometimes these
opinions are related to their background. Below we have made up two
imagined politicians of different background. We wish to know which of
these you think will be mostly in agreement with the statement
below.
Please choose the person you believe would be most in agreement with the
following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
“Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as
Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.”
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen person characteristics. See
background variables.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran34=2. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are asked
to choose between two profiles of political representatives, that
randomly differs in characteristics, and determine which of the profiles
that are most likely to agree with a given statement.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Politician 1 |
247 |
46.3% |
0.46341463 |
| 2 |
Politician 2 |
268 |
50.3% |
0.50281426 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
3.4% |
0.03377111 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4156 |
|
NA |
r7pad8a
|
Variable label:
|
Attitudes related to background: Persons, “Most of the reductions in
emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has committed to, should be
carried out abroad”
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have differing political opinions, and sometimes these
opinions are related to their background. Below we have made up two
imagined persons of different background. We wish to know which of these
you think will be mostly in agreement with the statement below.
Please choose the person you believe would be most in agreement with the
following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
“Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway
has committed to, should be carried out abroad.”
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen person characteristics. See
background variables.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran34=1. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are asked
to choose between profiles of two persons, that randomly differs in
characteristics, and determine which of the profiles that are most
likely to agree with a given statement.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Person 1 |
259 |
46.3% |
0.46332737 |
| 2 |
Person 2 |
283 |
50.6% |
0.50626118 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
3.0% |
0.03041145 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4130 |
|
NA |
r7pad8b
|
Variable label:
|
Attitudes related to background: Politicians, “Most of the reductions in
emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has committed to, should be
carried out abroad”
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have differing political opinions, and sometimes these
opinions are related to their background. Below we have made up two
imagined politicians of different background. We wish to know which of
these you think will be mostly in agreement with the statement
below.
Please choose the person you believe would be most in agreement with the
following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
“Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway
has committed to, should be carried out abroad.”
[Here follows a list of randomly chosen person characteristics. See
background variables.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran34=2. Conjunction experiment. Respondents are asked
to choose between two profiles of political representatives, that
randomly differs in characteristics, and determine which of the profiles
that are most likely to agree with a given statement.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Politician 1 |
259 |
48.6% |
0.48592871 |
| 2 |
Politician 2 |
253 |
47.5% |
0.47467167 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
3.9% |
0.03939962 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4156 |
|
NA |
r7fri1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Art and culture, band and choir
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied
arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums,
collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and
artistic activities]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
199 |
16.8% |
0.16807432 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
971 |
82.0% |
0.82010135 |
r7fri1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Athletics and sport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle
club, company sports and disabled sports]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Athletics and sport |
283 |
23.9% |
0.23902027 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
887 |
74.9% |
0.74915541 |
r7fri1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts.
Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners’ clubs. Student
societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and
recreational activities]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
219 |
18.5% |
0.18496622 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
951 |
80.3% |
0.80320946 |
r7fri1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Education, training and research
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools
including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only
in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools.
Universities and university colleges. Vocational/technical education.
Adult education and further education. Research and development]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Education, training and research |
119 |
10.1% |
0.10050676 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1051 |
88.8% |
0.88766892 |
r7fri1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Health, nursing and rescue work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home.
Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions.
Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and
ambulance services]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
65 |
5.5% |
0.05489865 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1105 |
93.3% |
0.93327703 |
r7fri1_6
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Social services and substance abuse care
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian
Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People’s Aid. Family
counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled.
Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer centres]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
79 |
6.7% |
0.06672297 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1091 |
92.1% |
0.92145270 |
r7fri1_7
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental
protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection.
Veterinary services]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
31 |
2.6% |
0.02618243 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1139 |
96.2% |
0.96199324 |
r7fri1_8
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Residents’ associations, community associations and local
neighbourhood
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
[Meeting house]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
143 |
12.1% |
0.12077703 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1027 |
86.7% |
0.86739865 |
r7fri1_9
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
136 |
11.5% |
0.11486486 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1034 |
87.3% |
0.87331081 |
r7fri1_10
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Rights, support and advocacy work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women’s rights.
Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners,
the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
24 |
2.0% |
0.02027027 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1146 |
96.8% |
0.96790541 |
r7fri1_11
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Political parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties [Youth political parties]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Political parties |
18 |
1.5% |
0.01520270 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1152 |
97.3% |
0.97297297 |
r7fri1_12
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: International exchange, emergency help, assistance and
human rights work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
[International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief
and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
45 |
3.8% |
0.03800676 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1125 |
95.0% |
0.95016892 |
r7fri1_13
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee
organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations.
Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
71 |
6.0% |
0.05996622 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1099 |
92.8% |
0.92820946 |
r7fri1_14
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations
linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other
religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the
Norwegian Humanist Association]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
81 |
6.8% |
0.06841216 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1089 |
92.0% |
0.91976351 |
r7fri1_15
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Immigrant organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background,
culture, identity outside Norway]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Immigrant organisations |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1154 |
97.5% |
0.97466216 |
r7fri1_16
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Other, specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify |
31 |
2.6% |
0.02618243 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1139 |
96.2% |
0.96199324 |
r7fri1_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7fri1_17
|
Variable label:
|
No, not volunteering
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
375 |
31.7% |
0.31672297 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
795 |
67.1% |
0.67145270 |
r7fri2
|
Variable label:
|
How much time spent volunteering during a week, last year
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the last year as a whole, roughly how much time did
you spend on voluntary work during an ordinary week?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R7FRI1_17!=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than half an hour |
274 |
33.9% |
0.33868974 |
| 2 |
Between half an hour and one hour |
153 |
18.9% |
0.18912237 |
| 3 |
1 to 2 hours |
157 |
19.4% |
0.19406675 |
| 4 |
2 to 5 hours |
110 |
13.6% |
0.13597033 |
| 5 |
More than 5 hours |
84 |
10.4% |
0.10383189 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
3.8% |
0.03831891 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3880 |
|
NA |
r7fri1b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteered for what within health/nursing/rescue: Health
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have answered that you have carried out voluntary, unpaid work for
voluntary organisations within health, nursing and rescue work. Within
which of these areas have you carried out voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health
|
|
Post-question:
|
Flere kryss mulig
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R7FRI1_5=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health |
31 |
47.7% |
0.47692308 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
1.5% |
0.01538462 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4624 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
33 |
50.8% |
0.50769231 |
r7fri1b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteered for what within health/nursing/rescue: Nursing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have answered that you have carried out voluntary, unpaid work for
voluntary organisations within health, nursing and rescue work. Within
which of these areas have you carried out voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nursing
|
|
Post-question:
|
Flere kryss mulig
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R7FRI1_5=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nursing |
28 |
43.1% |
0.43076923 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
1.5% |
0.01538462 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4624 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
36 |
55.4% |
0.55384615 |
r7fri1b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteered for what within health/nursing/rescue: Emergency/Rescue work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have answered that you have carried out voluntary, unpaid work for
voluntary organisations within health, nursing and rescue work. Within
which of these areas have you carried out voluntary work?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Emergency/Rescue work
|
|
Post-question:
|
Flere kryss mulig
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R7FRI1_5=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Emergency/Rescue work |
13 |
20.0% |
0.20000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
1.5% |
0.01538462 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4624 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
51 |
78.5% |
0.78461538 |
r7fri4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Knowledge of emergency work in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When someone is missing, has been injured out in nature or when large
accidents occur, an extensive apparatus of volunteers is activated to
assist the police in searching for missing persons. These volunteers are
members of different emergency response organisations and have undergone
training in searching, tracking, first aid, navigation etc.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How good is your knowledge of emergency work in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
41 |
3.5% |
0.03462838 |
| 2 |
Good |
432 |
36.5% |
0.36486486 |
| 3 |
Slightly |
532 |
44.9% |
0.44932432 |
| 4 |
Very little |
129 |
10.9% |
0.10895270 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
27 |
2.3% |
0.02280405 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01942568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Knowledge of voluntary emergency organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
When someone is missing, has been injured out in nature or when large
accidents occur, an extensive apparatus of volunteers is activated to
assist the police in searching for missing persons. These volunteers are
members of different emergency response organisations and have undergone
training in searching, tracking, first aid, navigation etc.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How good is your knowledge of the voluntary emergency organisations?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02533784 |
| 2 |
Good |
442 |
37.3% |
0.37331081 |
| 3 |
Slightly |
544 |
45.9% |
0.45945946 |
| 4 |
Very little |
113 |
9.5% |
0.09543919 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
28 |
2.4% |
0.02364865 |
| 97 |
No answer |
27 |
2.3% |
0.02280405 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri4c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Aware of voluntary emergency organisations: NAK air services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these voluntary emergency organisations are you aware of?
|
|
Literal question:
|
NAK air services
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NAK air services |
55 |
4.6% |
0.04645270 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1113 |
94.0% |
0.94003378 |
r7fri4c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Aware of voluntary emergency organisations: Norwegian rescue dogs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these voluntary emergency organisations are you aware of?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian rescue dogs
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian rescue dogs |
842 |
71.1% |
0.71114865 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
326 |
27.5% |
0.27533784 |
r7fri4c_3
|
Variable label:
|
Aware of voluntary emergency organisations: Norwegian People’s Aid First
Aid and Rescue services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these voluntary emergency organisations are you aware of?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norsk Folkehjelp Sanitet (Norwegian People’s Aid First Aid and Rescue
services)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norsk Folkehjelp Sanitet (Norwegian People's Aid First Aid and Rescue services) |
876 |
74.0% |
0.73986486 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
292 |
24.7% |
0.24662162 |
r7fri4c_4
|
Variable label:
|
Aware of voluntary emergency organisations: Norwegian Speleological
Society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these voluntary emergency organisations are you aware of?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian Speleological Society
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian Speleological Society |
48 |
4.1% |
0.04054054 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1120 |
94.6% |
0.94594595 |
r7fri4c_5
|
Variable label:
|
Aware of voluntary emergency organisations: Norwegian Radio Relay League
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these voluntary emergency organisations are you aware of?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian Radio Relay League (amateur radio organisation)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian Radio Relay League (amateur radio organisation) |
92 |
7.8% |
0.07770270 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1076 |
90.9% |
0.90878378 |
r7fri4c_6
|
Variable label:
|
Aware of voluntary emergency organisations: Rovers response group
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these voluntary emergency organisations are you aware of?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Rovernes Beredskapsgruppe (The Norwegian Guide and Scout Association -
Rovers response group)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rovernes Beredskapsgruppe (The Norwegian Guide and Scout Association - Rovers
response group) |
79 |
6.7% |
0.06672297 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1089 |
92.0% |
0.91976351 |
r7fri4c_7
|
Variable label:
|
Aware of voluntary emergency organisations: The Norwegian Red Cross
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these voluntary emergency organisations are you aware of?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian Red Cross
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Norwegian Red Cross |
1146 |
96.8% |
0.96790541 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
r7fri4c_8
|
Variable label:
|
Aware of voluntary emergency organisations: The Norwegian Society for
Sea Rescue
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of these voluntary emergency organisations are you aware of?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian Society for Sea Rescue
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Norwegian Society for Sea Rescue |
1094 |
92.4% |
0.92398649 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
74 |
6.2% |
0.06250000 |
r7fri4d
|
Variable label:
|
Member of an organisation which takes part in emergency response work in
Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you a member of an organisation which takes part in the emergency
response work in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
154 |
13.0% |
0.13006757 |
| 2 |
No |
1004 |
84.8% |
0.84797297 |
| 97 |
No answer |
26 |
2.2% |
0.02195946 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri4e
|
Variable label:
|
Participated as a volunteer in a search and rescue action
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you participated as a volunteer in a search and rescue action?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, several times |
58 |
4.9% |
0.04898649 |
| 2 |
Yes, once |
102 |
8.6% |
0.08614865 |
| 3 |
No |
997 |
84.2% |
0.84206081 |
| 97 |
No answer |
27 |
2.3% |
0.02280405 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri4f
|
Variable label:
|
Has assisted the police/voluntary organisation as a volunteer during an
accident
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you as a volunteer assisted the police or a voluntary organisation
during an accident?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, several times |
61 |
5.2% |
0.05152027 |
| 2 |
Yes, once |
118 |
10.0% |
0.09966216 |
| 3 |
No |
962 |
81.2% |
0.81250000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
3.6% |
0.03631757 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7ran38
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=1 and R7FRI4d=2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=1 and R7FRI4d=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1004] [Invalid:3685]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
503 |
50.1% |
0.500996 |
| 2 |
2 |
501 |
49.9% |
0.499004 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3685 |
|
NA |
r7fri4g
|
Variable label:
|
Are you interested in becoming a member of such an organisation?
(Members of emergency organisations undergoes courses and must be ready
at a moments notice).
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Members of emergency response organisations must undergo several
different training courses in areas like first aid, navigation,
communication and wilderness tracking. These must also be ready for
action at a moments notice.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you interested in becoming a member of such an organisation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran38=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
112 |
22.3% |
0.222664016 |
| 2 |
No |
177 |
35.2% |
0.351888668 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
211 |
41.9% |
0.419483101 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.6% |
0.005964215 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4186 |
|
NA |
r7fri4g1
|
Variable label:
|
If no, why not? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If no, why not?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran38=1 AND R7FRI4g=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7fri4h
|
Variable label:
|
Are you interested in becoming a member of an emergency response
organisation?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you interested in becoming a member of an emergency response
organisation?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran38=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
90 |
18.0% |
0.17964072 |
| 2 |
No |
135 |
26.9% |
0.26946108 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
271 |
54.1% |
0.54091816 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.0% |
0.00998004 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4188 |
|
NA |
r7fri4h1
|
Variable label:
|
If no, why not? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If no, why not?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran38=2 AND R7FRI4h=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7fri4i
|
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of participation in search and rescue operation: Asked by the
police
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were asked by the police to participate in a search and rescue
operation, how likely is it that you would have participated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
597 |
50.4% |
0.50422297 |
| 2 |
Most likely |
400 |
33.8% |
0.33783784 |
| 3 |
Neither one way or the other |
73 |
6.2% |
0.06165541 |
| 4 |
Most unlikely |
54 |
4.6% |
0.04560811 |
| 5 |
Very unlikely |
39 |
3.3% |
0.03293919 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01773649 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri4j
|
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of participation in search and rescue operation: Asked by
voluntary organisation
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were asked by a voluntary organisation to participate in a search
and rescue operation, how likely is it that you would have participated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
425 |
35.9% |
0.35895270 |
| 2 |
Most likely |
475 |
40.1% |
0.40118243 |
| 3 |
Neither one way or the other |
145 |
12.2% |
0.12246622 |
| 4 |
Most unlikely |
61 |
5.2% |
0.05152027 |
| 5 |
Very unlikely |
41 |
3.5% |
0.03462838 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
3.1% |
0.03125000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri4k
|
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of participation in search and rescue operation: Asked by
family/someone you know
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were asked by your family or someone you know to participate in a
search and rescue operation, how likely is it that you would have
participated?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
851 |
71.9% |
0.71875000 |
| 2 |
Most likely |
241 |
20.4% |
0.20354730 |
| 3 |
Neither one way or the other |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01773649 |
| 4 |
Most unlikely |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
| 5 |
Very unlikely |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
| 97 |
No answer |
33 |
2.8% |
0.02787162 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri4l_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Voluntary organisation’s role in emergency work gets little
coverage by the media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The voluntary organisations’ role in emergency work gets little coverage
by the media.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
117 |
9.9% |
0.09881757 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
429 |
36.2% |
0.36233108 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
305 |
25.8% |
0.25760135 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
268 |
22.6% |
0.22635135 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
39 |
3.3% |
0.03293919 |
| 97 |
No answer |
26 |
2.2% |
0.02195946 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri4l_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Important to my participation in rescue work that I
personally know the leader/members
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
If I am to participate as a volunteer in rescue work it is important to
me that I know the leader or other members of the organisation on a
personal basis.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
41 |
3.5% |
0.03462838 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
224 |
18.9% |
0.18918919 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
400 |
33.8% |
0.33783784 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
324 |
27.4% |
0.27364865 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
164 |
13.9% |
0.13851351 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
2.6% |
0.02618243 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri4l_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Emergency response work public responsibility limited to
public institutions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Emergency response work should be the responsibility of the public
authorities and limited to public institutions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
64 |
5.4% |
0.05405405 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
189 |
16.0% |
0.15962838 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
424 |
35.8% |
0.35810811 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
376 |
31.8% |
0.31756757 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
102 |
8.6% |
0.08614865 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
2.4% |
0.02449324 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri4l_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Voluntary organisations should have an important role in
emergency response work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Voluntary organisations should have an important role in emergency
response work in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
251 |
21.2% |
0.21199324 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
569 |
48.1% |
0.48057432 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
270 |
22.8% |
0.22804054 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
50 |
4.2% |
0.04222973 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01182432 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02533784 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri4l_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Essential for my participation as a volunteer that employer
provides paid leave
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
If I should participate in voluntary rescue work it is essential that
the employer provides paid leave during assignments.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Completely agree |
177 |
14.9% |
0.14949324 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
285 |
24.1% |
0.24070946 |
| 3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
417 |
35.2% |
0.35219595 |
| 4 |
Somewhat disagree |
146 |
12.3% |
0.12331081 |
| 5 |
Completely agree |
113 |
9.5% |
0.09543919 |
| 97 |
No answer |
46 |
3.9% |
0.03885135 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri11
|
Variable label:
|
How good is your health?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how good is your health?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
322 |
27.2% |
0.27195946 |
| 2 |
Good |
673 |
56.8% |
0.56841216 |
| 3 |
Not very good |
152 |
12.8% |
0.12837838 |
| 4 |
Bad |
15 |
1.3% |
0.01266892 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri12
|
Variable label:
|
Do you suffer from health problems expected to last for at least six
months?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you suffer from any chronic illnesses or health problems that are
expected to last for at least six months or more?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
488 |
41.2% |
0.41216216 |
| 2 |
No |
617 |
52.1% |
0.52111486 |
| 3 |
Do not wish to reply |
49 |
4.1% |
0.04138514 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02533784 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri13
|
Variable label:
|
Has, due to health problems, been prevented from undertaking usual
activities during the last six months
|
|
Literal question:
|
During the last six months have you been prevented due to health
problems from undertaking any activities that people usually carry out?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, very much prevented |
59 |
5.0% |
0.04983108 |
| 2 |
Yes, prevented |
303 |
25.6% |
0.25591216 |
| 3 |
No, not prevented |
797 |
67.3% |
0.67314189 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
2.1% |
0.02111486 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri32
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of satisfaction with life at the moment
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you satisfied with life at the moment?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Extremely satisfied |
205 |
17.3% |
0.173141892 |
| 2 |
Very satisfied |
660 |
55.7% |
0.557432432 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
260 |
22.0% |
0.219594595 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
31 |
2.6% |
0.026182432 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
7 |
0.6% |
0.005912162 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.8% |
0.017736486 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri33
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think that what you are doing in life is
meaningful?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, to what extent do you think that what you are doing in life
is meaningful?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
219 |
18.5% |
0.184966216 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
620 |
52.4% |
0.523648649 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
263 |
22.2% |
0.222128378 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
46 |
3.9% |
0.038851351 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
2.4% |
0.023648649 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri36_1
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: Your standard of living
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your standard of living
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
335 |
28.3% |
0.282939189 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
659 |
55.7% |
0.556587838 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
128 |
10.8% |
0.108108108 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
19 |
1.6% |
0.016047297 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied |
14 |
1.2% |
0.011824324 |
| 6 |
Not satisfied at all |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004222973 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
2.0% |
0.020270270 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri36_2
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: Your health
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your health
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
212 |
17.9% |
0.17905405 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
572 |
48.3% |
0.48310811 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
245 |
20.7% |
0.20692568 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
70 |
5.9% |
0.05912162 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied |
35 |
3.0% |
0.02956081 |
| 6 |
Not satisfied at all |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
2.4% |
0.02364865 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri36_3
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: What you are achieving in life
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
What you are achieving in life
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
141 |
11.9% |
0.11908784 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
627 |
53.0% |
0.52956081 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
284 |
24.0% |
0.23986486 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
59 |
5.0% |
0.04983108 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied |
26 |
2.2% |
0.02195946 |
| 6 |
Not satisfied at all |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01013514 |
| 97 |
No answer |
35 |
3.0% |
0.02956081 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri36_4
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: Personal relationships
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your personal relationships
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
221 |
18.7% |
0.186655405 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
624 |
52.7% |
0.527027027 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
243 |
20.5% |
0.205236486 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
47 |
4.0% |
0.039695946 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied |
15 |
1.3% |
0.012668919 |
| 6 |
Not satisfied at all |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002533784 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
2.6% |
0.026182432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri36_5
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: Feeling secure
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
How secure you feel
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
336 |
28.4% |
0.283783784 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
638 |
53.9% |
0.538851351 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
135 |
11.4% |
0.114020270 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
26 |
2.2% |
0.021959459 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied |
14 |
1.2% |
0.011824324 |
| 6 |
Not satisfied at all |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 97 |
No answer |
27 |
2.3% |
0.022804054 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri36_6
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: The feeling of being part of a neighbourhood
community
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The feeling of being part of a neighbourhood community
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
111 |
9.4% |
0.09375000 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
502 |
42.4% |
0.42398649 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
328 |
27.7% |
0.27702703 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
122 |
10.3% |
0.10304054 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied |
33 |
2.8% |
0.02787162 |
| 6 |
Not satisfied at all |
25 |
2.1% |
0.02111486 |
| 97 |
No answer |
63 |
5.3% |
0.05320946 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri36_7
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: The prospects for security in the future
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The prospects for security in the future
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
159 |
13.4% |
0.13429054 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
588 |
49.7% |
0.49662162 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
281 |
23.7% |
0.23733108 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
72 |
6.1% |
0.06081081 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied |
31 |
2.6% |
0.02618243 |
| 6 |
Not satisfied at all |
20 |
1.7% |
0.01689189 |
| 97 |
No answer |
33 |
2.8% |
0.02787162 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri36_8
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: The amount of time to do things you like doing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The amount of time you have to do the things you like doing
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
147 |
12.4% |
0.12415541 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
502 |
42.4% |
0.42398649 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
297 |
25.1% |
0.25084459 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
127 |
10.7% |
0.10726351 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied |
43 |
3.6% |
0.03631757 |
| 6 |
Not satisfied at all |
38 |
3.2% |
0.03209459 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02533784 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri36_9
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: Quality of nature and the environment in local area
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
The quality of nature and the environment in your local area
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
454 |
38.3% |
0.3834459459 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
550 |
46.5% |
0.4645270270 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
116 |
9.8% |
0.0979729730 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
25 |
2.1% |
0.0211148649 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied |
9 |
0.8% |
0.0076013514 |
| 6 |
Not satisfied at all |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008445946 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
2.4% |
0.0244932432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri36_10
|
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: Your job
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your job
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
176 |
14.9% |
0.14864865 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
429 |
36.2% |
0.36233108 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
160 |
13.5% |
0.13513514 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
40 |
3.4% |
0.03378378 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
| 6 |
Not satisfied at all |
18 |
1.5% |
0.01520270 |
| 7 |
Not relevant |
300 |
25.3% |
0.25337838 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
3.3% |
0.03293919 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7friend
|
Variable label:
|
Amount of friends
|
|
Literal question:
|
Approximately how many friends do you have at the moment?
|
|
Post-question:
|
These are people you can relax with, talk to about private topics or ask
for help.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01604730 |
| 2 |
1-2 |
157 |
13.3% |
0.13260135 |
| 3 |
3-5 |
409 |
34.5% |
0.34543919 |
| 4 |
6-10 |
350 |
29.6% |
0.29560811 |
| 5 |
More than 10 |
224 |
18.9% |
0.18918919 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
2.1% |
0.02111486 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7frnet_1
|
Variable label:
|
Are there any people you know personally who: Could help you find a job
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Among the people you know personally, are there any who … More than one
answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Could help you to find a job, if necessary?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Could help you to find a job, if necessary? |
538 |
45.4% |
0.45439189 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
624 |
52.7% |
0.52702703 |
r7frnet_2
|
Variable label:
|
Are there any people you know personally who: Could lend you a large
amount of money
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Among the people you know personally, are there any who … More than one
answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Could lend you a large amount of money (e.g. 20,000 kroner)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Could lend you a large amount of money (e.g. 20,000 kroner)? |
627 |
53.0% |
0.52956081 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
535 |
45.2% |
0.45185811 |
r7frnet_3
|
Variable label:
|
Are there any people you know personally who: Have a high position in
business/public/politics
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Among the people you know personally, are there any who … More than one
answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have a high position in business, public administration or politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Have a high position in business, public administration or politics? |
380 |
32.1% |
0.32094595 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
782 |
66.0% |
0.66047297 |
r7frnet_4
|
Variable label:
|
No such people among those I know personally
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Among the people you know personally, are there any who … More than one
answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
There are no such people among the people I know personally
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
There are no such people among the people I know personally |
312 |
26.4% |
0.26351351 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
850 |
71.8% |
0.71790541 |
r7fri5
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you travel and stay overnight at least one night?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how often do you travel and stay overnight at least one
night?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Take into account business travel, holiday trips and week-end trips etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Weekly |
34 |
2.9% |
0.028716216 |
| 2 |
Monthly |
345 |
29.1% |
0.291385135 |
| 3 |
At least once every half year |
551 |
46.5% |
0.465371622 |
| 4 |
At least once a year |
161 |
13.6% |
0.135979730 |
| 5 |
Less often |
47 |
4.0% |
0.039695946 |
| 6 |
Never |
15 |
1.3% |
0.012668919 |
| 7 |
Don't know |
7 |
0.6% |
0.005912162 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
2.0% |
0.020270270 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri5b
|
Variable label:
|
Has been travelling continuously at least 3 weeks during the last year
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you been travelling continuously for at least 3 weeks during the
last year?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and RANGE (R7FRI5,1,5). ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
318 |
27.9% |
0.279437610 |
| 2 |
No |
817 |
71.8% |
0.717926186 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002636204 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3551 |
|
NA |
r7fri5c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Length of longest lasting travel last year
|
|
Literal question:
|
How long was the period of your longest lasting travel during the last
year?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Note number of weeks:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R7FRI5b=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-90]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97.0 |
No answer |
4 |
1.3% |
0.012578616 |
| 98.0 |
Not asked |
4371 |
|
NA |
| 1.0 |
|
4 |
1.3% |
0.012578616 |
| 2.0 |
|
15 |
4.7% |
0.047169811 |
| 3.0 |
|
142 |
44.7% |
0.446540881 |
| 3.1 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003144654 |
| 3.5 |
|
9 |
2.8% |
0.028301887 |
| 4.0 |
|
81 |
25.5% |
0.254716981 |
| 4.5 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003144654 |
| 5.0 |
|
22 |
6.9% |
0.069182390 |
| 6.0 |
|
11 |
3.5% |
0.034591195 |
| 6.5 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003144654 |
| 7.0 |
|
3 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
| 8.0 |
|
4 |
1.3% |
0.012578616 |
| 9.0 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003144654 |
| 10.0 |
|
4 |
1.3% |
0.012578616 |
| 12.0 |
|
3 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
| 14.0 |
|
2 |
0.6% |
0.006289308 |
| 15.0 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003144654 |
| 16.0 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003144654 |
| 18.0 |
|
2 |
0.6% |
0.006289308 |
| 20.0 |
|
3 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
| 30.0 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003144654 |
| 34.0 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003144654 |
| 90.0 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003144654 |
r7fri6
|
Variable label:
|
Time spent on hobbies and recreational activities a normal week
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much time do you spend on hobbies and recreational activities during
a normal week?
|
|
Post-question:
|
For example participation in sporting activities, band, choir, outdoor
activities, organisational meetings and gatherings. Take into account
both organised and unorganised activities.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
More than 5 hours |
302 |
25.5% |
0.25506757 |
| 2 |
2-5 hours |
385 |
32.5% |
0.32516892 |
| 3 |
1-2 hours |
195 |
16.5% |
0.16469595 |
| 4 |
Less than 1 hour |
97 |
8.2% |
0.08192568 |
| 5 |
Do not participate in any hobby or recreational activities |
150 |
12.7% |
0.12668919 |
| 6 |
Don't know |
32 |
2.7% |
0.02702703 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01942568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Assists: Relatives not living with you, neighbours/friends/colleagues
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you on a regular basis assist any of the following? More than one
answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Relatives not living with you, neighbours, friends or colleagues (for
example giving lifts, shopping, gardening, tidying and cleaning,
supervision and attention, care or any other type of assistance).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Relatives not living with you, neighbours, friends or colleagues (for example
giving lifts, shopping, gardening, tidying and cleaning, supervision and
attention, care or any other type of assistance). |
535 |
45.2% |
0.45185811 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
627 |
53.0% |
0.52956081 |
r7fri7_2
|
Variable label:
|
Assists: Someone in your home with special care requirements
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you on a regular basis assist any of the following? More than one
answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Someone in your household that have special care requirements (for
example assistance due to age, illness or disabilities).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Someone in your household that have special care requirements (for example
assistance due to age, illness or disabilities). |
149 |
12.6% |
0.12584459 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1013 |
85.6% |
0.85557432 |
r7fri7_3
|
Variable label:
|
Assists: No
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you on a regular basis assist any of the following? More than one
answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
502 |
42.4% |
0.42398649 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
660 |
55.7% |
0.55743243 |
r7fri7_4
|
Variable label:
|
Assists: Don’t know
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you on a regular basis assist any of the following? More than one
answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t know
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Don't know |
42 |
3.5% |
0.03547297 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.9% |
0.01858108 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1120 |
94.6% |
0.94594595 |
r7fri7b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Provides type of assistance: Visits
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What type of assistance do you provide? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Visits, contact
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1, R7FRI7_1=1 OR R7FRI7_2=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Visits, contact |
389 |
63.7% |
0.6366612 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4078 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
222 |
36.3% |
0.3633388 |
r7fri7b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Provides type of assistance: Supervision
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What type of assistance do you provide? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Supervision or attention (for example, looking after children, regular
telephone calls, other types of attention)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1, R7FRI7_1=1 OR R7FRI7_2=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Supervision or attention (for example, looking after children, regular telephone
calls, other types of attention) |
282 |
46.2% |
0.4615385 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4078 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
329 |
53.8% |
0.5384615 |
r7fri7b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Provides type of assistance: Personal care
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What type of assistance do you provide? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Personal care (for example hygiene, assistance with medicines, mobility)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1, R7FRI7_1=1 OR R7FRI7_2=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Personal care (for example hygiene, assistance with medicines, mobility) |
72 |
11.8% |
0.1178396 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4078 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
539 |
88.2% |
0.8821604 |
r7fri7b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Provides type of assistance: Housework
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What type of assistance do you provide? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housework (for example, washing, cooking, shopping for food)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1, R7FRI7_1=1 OR R7FRI7_2=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housework (for example, washing, cooking, shopping for food) |
162 |
26.5% |
0.2651391 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4078 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
449 |
73.5% |
0.7348609 |
r7fri7b_5
|
Variable label:
|
Provides type of assistance: Administrative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What type of assistance do you provide? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Administrative tasks (for example contact authorities, health care or
banking)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1, R7FRI7_1=1 OR R7FRI7_2=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Administrative tasks (for example contact authorities, health care or banking) |
164 |
26.8% |
0.2684124 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4078 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
447 |
73.2% |
0.7315876 |
r7fri7b_6
|
Variable label:
|
Provides type of assistance: Transport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What type of assistance do you provide? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Transport (for example giving lifts in your car, collect/deliver to
kindergarten/to school)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1, R7FRI7_1=1 OR R7FRI7_2=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Transport (for example giving lifts in your car, collect/deliver to
kindergarten/to school) |
296 |
48.4% |
0.4844517 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4078 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
315 |
51.6% |
0.5155483 |
r7fri7b_7
|
Variable label:
|
Provides type of assistance: Gardening and the like
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What type of assistance do you provide? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gardening, repair work in the home and the like.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1, R7FRI7_1=1 OR R7FRI7_2=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gardening, repair work in the home and the like. |
236 |
38.6% |
0.386252 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4078 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
375 |
61.4% |
0.613748 |
r7fri7b_8
|
Variable label:
|
Provides type of assistance: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What type of assistance do you provide? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1, R7FRI7_1=1 OR R7FRI7_2=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other |
114 |
18.7% |
0.1865794 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4078 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
497 |
81.3% |
0.8134206 |
r7fri7b_9
|
Variable label:
|
Provides type of assistance: Don’t know
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What type of assistance do you provide? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t know
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1, R7FRI7_1=1 OR R7FRI7_2=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Don't know |
2 |
0.3% |
0.003273322 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4078 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
609 |
99.7% |
0.996726678 |
r7fri7c
|
Variable label:
|
Total time spent assisting during a normal week
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much time in total do you spend doing this during a normal week?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1, R7FRI7_1=1 OR R7FRI7_2=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
More than 5 hours |
88 |
14.4% |
0.144026187 |
| 2 |
2-5 hours |
181 |
29.6% |
0.296235679 |
| 3 |
1-2 hours |
200 |
32.7% |
0.327332242 |
| 4 |
Less than 1 hour |
104 |
17.0% |
0.170212766 |
| 5 |
Don't know |
37 |
6.1% |
0.060556465 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001636661 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4078 |
|
NA |
r7fri7d
|
Variable label:
|
Who do you assist the most?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Who do you assist the most?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1, R7FRI7_1=1 OR R7FRI7_2=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Spouse, partner, or the like |
80 |
13.1% |
0.13093290 |
| 2 |
Children/grand children |
210 |
34.4% |
0.34369885 |
| 3 |
Parents/in laws |
160 |
26.2% |
0.26186579 |
| 4 |
Siblings |
41 |
6.7% |
0.06710311 |
| 5 |
Grand parents |
13 |
2.1% |
0.02127660 |
| 6 |
Other relative or close relation |
33 |
5.4% |
0.05400982 |
| 7 |
Other relationship (for example neighbour or friend) |
74 |
12.1% |
0.12111293 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4078 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_1
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Satisfactorily
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Satisfactorily
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
148 |
12.5% |
0.1250000000 |
| 2 |
Well |
523 |
44.2% |
0.4417229730 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
212 |
17.9% |
0.1790540541 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
165 |
13.9% |
0.1393581081 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
13 |
1.1% |
0.0109797297 |
| 6 |
Badly |
4 |
0.3% |
0.0033783784 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008445946 |
| 97 |
No answer |
118 |
10.0% |
0.0996621622 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_2
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Rewarding
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Rewarding
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
201 |
17.0% |
0.1697635135 |
| 2 |
Well |
539 |
45.5% |
0.4552364865 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
191 |
16.1% |
0.1613175676 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
128 |
10.8% |
0.1081081081 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
9 |
0.8% |
0.0076013514 |
| 6 |
Badly |
5 |
0.4% |
0.0042229730 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008445946 |
| 97 |
No answer |
110 |
9.3% |
0.0929054054 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_3
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Exciting
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Exciting
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
75 |
6.3% |
0.063344595 |
| 2 |
Well |
319 |
26.9% |
0.269425676 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
275 |
23.2% |
0.232263514 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
300 |
25.3% |
0.253378378 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
56 |
4.7% |
0.047297297 |
| 6 |
Badly |
20 |
1.7% |
0.016891892 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005067568 |
| 97 |
No answer |
133 |
11.2% |
0.112331081 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_4
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Important
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
356 |
30.1% |
0.300675676 |
| 2 |
Well |
489 |
41.3% |
0.413006757 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
139 |
11.7% |
0.117398649 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
91 |
7.7% |
0.076858108 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004222973 |
| 6 |
Badly |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002533784 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001689189 |
| 97 |
No answer |
99 |
8.4% |
0.083614865 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_5
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Fun
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fun
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
72 |
6.1% |
0.060810811 |
| 2 |
Well |
320 |
27.0% |
0.270270270 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
317 |
26.8% |
0.267736486 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
296 |
25.0% |
0.250000000 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
35 |
3.0% |
0.029560811 |
| 6 |
Badly |
16 |
1.4% |
0.013513514 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005067568 |
| 97 |
No answer |
122 |
10.3% |
0.103040541 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_6
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Challenging
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Challenging
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
101 |
8.5% |
0.085304054 |
| 2 |
Well |
365 |
30.8% |
0.308277027 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
292 |
24.7% |
0.246621622 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
239 |
20.2% |
0.201858108 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
34 |
2.9% |
0.028716216 |
| 6 |
Badly |
19 |
1.6% |
0.016047297 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007601351 |
| 97 |
No answer |
125 |
10.6% |
0.105574324 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_7
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Disappointing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Disappointing
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
7 |
0.6% |
0.005912162 |
| 2 |
Well |
31 |
2.6% |
0.026182432 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
60 |
5.1% |
0.050675676 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
340 |
28.7% |
0.287162162 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
197 |
16.6% |
0.166385135 |
| 6 |
Badly |
256 |
21.6% |
0.216216216 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
134 |
11.3% |
0.113175676 |
| 97 |
No answer |
159 |
13.4% |
0.134290541 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_8
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Emotionally exhausting
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Emotionally exhausting
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
17 |
1.4% |
0.01435811 |
| 2 |
Well |
92 |
7.8% |
0.07770270 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
157 |
13.3% |
0.13260135 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
357 |
30.2% |
0.30152027 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
144 |
12.2% |
0.12162162 |
| 6 |
Badly |
176 |
14.9% |
0.14864865 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
93 |
7.9% |
0.07854730 |
| 97 |
No answer |
148 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_9
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Physically tiring
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Physically tiring
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
13 |
1.1% |
0.01097973 |
| 2 |
Well |
93 |
7.9% |
0.07854730 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
193 |
16.3% |
0.16300676 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
378 |
31.9% |
0.31925676 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
133 |
11.2% |
0.11233108 |
| 6 |
Badly |
150 |
12.7% |
0.12668919 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
76 |
6.4% |
0.06418919 |
| 97 |
No answer |
148 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_10
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Frustrating
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Frustrating
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
7 |
0.6% |
0.005912162 |
| 2 |
Well |
52 |
4.4% |
0.043918919 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
146 |
12.3% |
0.123310811 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
359 |
30.3% |
0.303209459 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
150 |
12.7% |
0.126689189 |
| 6 |
Badly |
193 |
16.3% |
0.163006757 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
113 |
9.5% |
0.095439189 |
| 97 |
No answer |
164 |
13.9% |
0.138513514 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_11
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Depressing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Depressing
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004222973 |
| 2 |
Well |
24 |
2.0% |
0.020270270 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
71 |
6.0% |
0.059966216 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
321 |
27.1% |
0.271114865 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
148 |
12.5% |
0.125000000 |
| 6 |
Badly |
244 |
20.6% |
0.206081081 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
208 |
17.6% |
0.175675676 |
| 97 |
No answer |
163 |
13.8% |
0.137668919 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_12
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Time consuming
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Time consuming
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
48 |
4.1% |
0.04054054 |
| 2 |
Well |
192 |
16.2% |
0.16216216 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
271 |
22.9% |
0.22888514 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
329 |
27.8% |
0.27787162 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
79 |
6.7% |
0.06672297 |
| 6 |
Badly |
75 |
6.3% |
0.06334459 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
39 |
3.3% |
0.03293919 |
| 97 |
No answer |
151 |
12.8% |
0.12753378 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fr31_13
|
Variable label:
|
How well does description of voluntary work fit: Easy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or badly do you
think these descriptions fit?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Easy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very well |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02533784 |
| 2 |
Well |
164 |
13.9% |
0.13851351 |
| 3 |
Somewhat well |
196 |
16.6% |
0.16554054 |
| 4 |
Neither well nor badly |
454 |
38.3% |
0.38344595 |
| 5 |
Somewhat badly |
105 |
8.9% |
0.08868243 |
| 6 |
Badly |
57 |
4.8% |
0.04814189 |
| 7 |
Very badly |
26 |
2.2% |
0.02195946 |
| 97 |
No answer |
152 |
12.8% |
0.12837838 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri14
|
Variable label:
|
Have you participated in any protests the past year to improve society?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you participated in any protests or demonstrations during the past
year in an attempt to bring about improvements in society?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
116 |
9.8% |
0.09797297 |
| 2 |
No |
1036 |
87.5% |
0.87500000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
32 |
2.7% |
0.02702703 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3505 |
|
NA |
r7fri15
|
Variable label:
|
Who organised the most recent protest you participated in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you cast your mind back to the most recent protest or demonstration
that you participated in, who was it organised by?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R7FRI14=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A voluntary organisation, union or party |
76 |
65.5% |
0.65517241 |
| 2 |
Individuals or a non-organised group or network |
39 |
33.6% |
0.33620690 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.00862069 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4573 |
|
NA |
r7fri16
|
Variable label:
|
What type of organisation/union/party was it?
|
|
Literal question:
|
What type of organisation, union or party was it?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R7FRI15=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-16]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
7 |
9.2% |
0.09210526 |
| 2 |
Athletics and sport |
1 |
1.3% |
0.01315789 |
| 3 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 4 |
Education, training and research |
1 |
1.3% |
0.01315789 |
| 5 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
2 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
| 6 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
2 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
| 7 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
19 |
25.0% |
0.25000000 |
| 8 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
2 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
| 9 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 10 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
6 |
7.9% |
0.07894737 |
| 11 |
Political parties |
12 |
15.8% |
0.15789474 |
| 12 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
9 |
11.8% |
0.11842105 |
| 13 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
7 |
9.2% |
0.09210526 |
| 14 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
1 |
1.3% |
0.01315789 |
| 15 |
Immigrant organisations |
3 |
3.9% |
0.03947368 |
| 16 |
Other, specify |
4 |
5.3% |
0.05263158 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4613 |
|
NA |
r7fri16_16_other
|
Variable label:
|
What type of organisation/union/party was it? Other [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What type of organisation, union or party was it?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R7FRI15=1. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7fri17
|
Variable label:
|
How did you first hear about this protest?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How did you first hear about this protest?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R7FRI14=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Through an organisation, union or party of which I am a member |
25 |
21.6% |
0.21551724 |
| 2 |
Through colleagues at work or fellow students |
3 |
2.6% |
0.02586207 |
| 3 |
Through social networks, friends and acquaintances |
54 |
46.6% |
0.46551724 |
| 4 |
Through the media |
28 |
24.1% |
0.24137931 |
| 5 |
In a different way |
5 |
4.3% |
0.04310345 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.00862069 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4573 |
|
NA |
r7fri18
|
Variable label:
|
The way you first heard about this protest
|
|
Literal question:
|
In what way did you first hear about this protest?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R7FRI14=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Talking face to face |
15 |
12.9% |
0.12931034 |
| 2 |
Telephone conversation |
3 |
2.6% |
0.02586207 |
| 3 |
SMS |
3 |
2.6% |
0.02586207 |
| 4 |
Posters/notices |
1 |
0.9% |
0.00862069 |
| 5 |
Newspapers/magazines |
6 |
5.2% |
0.05172414 |
| 6 |
Online newspaper |
4 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
| 7 |
E-mail |
13 |
11.2% |
0.11206897 |
| 8 |
Facebook |
59 |
50.9% |
0.50862069 |
| 9 |
Other social media |
3 |
2.6% |
0.02586207 |
| 10 |
TV/radio |
3 |
2.6% |
0.02586207 |
| 11 |
Other |
4 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.7% |
0.01724138 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4573 |
|
NA |
r7km2
|
Variable label:
|
Concern about climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very concerned |
149 |
12.4% |
0.12427023 |
| 2 |
Concerned |
418 |
34.9% |
0.34862385 |
| 3 |
Somewhat concerned |
382 |
31.9% |
0.31859883 |
| 4 |
Slightly concerned |
190 |
15.8% |
0.15846539 |
| 5 |
Not concerned at all |
44 |
3.7% |
0.03669725 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.3% |
0.01334445 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7km3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative: Tighten up regulations governing permitted industrial
CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten up the regulations governing the permitted industrial CO2
emissions in Norway and Europe.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
232 |
19.3% |
0.19349458 |
| 2 |
Positive |
464 |
38.7% |
0.38698916 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
258 |
21.5% |
0.21517932 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
150 |
12.5% |
0.12510425 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
31 |
2.6% |
0.02585488 |
| 6 |
Negative |
24 |
2.0% |
0.02001668 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
12 |
1.0% |
0.01000834 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
2.3% |
0.02335279 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7km3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative: Storage of CO2 beneath the seabed/underground
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or
underground.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
98 |
8.2% |
0.08173478 |
| 2 |
Positive |
256 |
21.4% |
0.21351126 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
252 |
21.0% |
0.21017515 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
371 |
30.9% |
0.30942452 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
106 |
8.8% |
0.08840701 |
| 6 |
Negative |
53 |
4.4% |
0.04420350 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
29 |
2.4% |
0.02418682 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
2.8% |
0.02835696 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7km3_4
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative: Increased funding for renewable energy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Increase funding for research on and development of renewable energy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
582 |
48.5% |
0.485404504 |
| 2 |
Positive |
407 |
33.9% |
0.339449541 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
110 |
9.2% |
0.091743119 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
62 |
5.2% |
0.051709758 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006672227 |
| 6 |
Negative |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004170142 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001668057 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.019182652 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7km3_5
|
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative: Tighten up fiscal regulations to oil exploration on
Norwegian Continental Shelf
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten up the fiscal regulations which apply to oil exploration on the
Norwegian Continental Shelf
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positive |
145 |
12.1% |
0.12093411 |
| 2 |
Positive |
205 |
17.1% |
0.17097581 |
| 3 |
Somewhat positive |
203 |
16.9% |
0.16930776 |
| 4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
388 |
32.4% |
0.32360300 |
| 5 |
Somewhat negative |
96 |
8.0% |
0.08006672 |
| 6 |
Negative |
94 |
7.8% |
0.07839867 |
| 7 |
Very negative |
36 |
3.0% |
0.03002502 |
| 97 |
No answer |
32 |
2.7% |
0.02668891 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7km4
|
Variable label:
|
Discussion about cars, alternative closest to your view
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
A proposal that all new personal cars from 2025 should be powered by
electricity or hydrogen is currently being debated in the Storting. If
the proposal is adopted, it will not be possible to purchase new petrol
or diesel cars after 2025.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to your view?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
In 2025 all new personal cars being sold should be powered by electricity or
hydrogen. |
468 |
39.0% |
0.39032527 |
| 2 |
In 2025 it should still be possible to purchase new personal cars powered by
diesel or petrol. |
702 |
58.5% |
0.58548791 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
2.4% |
0.02418682 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7km4_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Further comments [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should you have any further comment you may write it here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7km5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you
agree/disagree with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
46 |
3.8% |
0.03836530 |
| 2 |
Agree |
209 |
17.4% |
0.17431193 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
429 |
35.8% |
0.35779817 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
222 |
18.5% |
0.18515430 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
150 |
12.5% |
0.12510425 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
88 |
7.3% |
0.07339450 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
27 |
2.3% |
0.02251877 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
2.3% |
0.02335279 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7km5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Citizens of rich countries should cut their consumption
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you
agree/disagree with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption
as part of the solution to the climate challenge.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
220 |
18.3% |
0.18348624 |
| 2 |
Agree |
343 |
28.6% |
0.28607173 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
339 |
28.3% |
0.28273561 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
109 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
80 |
6.7% |
0.06672227 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
51 |
4.3% |
0.04253545 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
34 |
2.8% |
0.02835696 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01918265 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7km6
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent is it possible to prevent harmful climate change,
statement closest to your viewpoint
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let us assume that climate change can be a major problem for the world
in the future if nothing is done about it. To what extent do you think
it is possible to prevent harmful climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Choose the statement that best matches your viewpoint:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It is impossible to prevent harmful climate change. |
106 |
8.8% |
0.088407006 |
| 2 |
It is possible, but very difficult, to prevent harmful climate change. |
812 |
67.7% |
0.677231026 |
| 3 |
It is possible and entirely realistic to prevent harmful climate change. |
245 |
20.4% |
0.204336947 |
| 4 |
It is easy to prevent harmful climate change. |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004170142 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
2.6% |
0.025854879 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7km7_1
|
Variable label:
|
How should your municipal authority prioritise the areas for food
production next ten years: Housing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politicians must often choose whether areas that can be used to produce
food should be used for other necessary purposes.
How do you feel your municipal authority should prioritise the use of
such areas for the next ten years? Please rank up to three alternatives
where 1 is the most important:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housing
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. Respondent are asked to select three options in R7KM7,
and rank these three from 1 -3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4022] [Invalid:667]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
151 |
28.4% |
0.2838346 |
| 2 |
|
194 |
36.5% |
0.3646617 |
| 3 |
|
187 |
35.2% |
0.3515038 |
| Sysmiss |
|
667 |
|
NA |
r7km7_2
|
Variable label:
|
How should your municipal authority prioritise the areas for food
production next ten years: Roads
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politicians must often choose whether areas that can be used to produce
food should be used for other necessary purposes.
How do you feel your municipal authority should prioritise the use of
such areas for the next ten years? Please rank up to three alternatives
where 1 is the most important:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Roads
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. Respondent are asked to select three options in R7KM7,
and rank these three from 1 -3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3838] [Invalid:851]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
71 |
20.4% |
0.2040230 |
| 2 |
|
111 |
31.9% |
0.3189655 |
| 3 |
|
166 |
47.7% |
0.4770115 |
| Sysmiss |
|
851 |
|
NA |
r7km7_3
|
Variable label:
|
How should your municipal authority prioritise the areas for food
production next ten years: Food production
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politicians must often choose whether areas that can be used to produce
food should be used for other necessary purposes.
How do you feel your municipal authority should prioritise the use of
such areas for the next ten years? Please rank up to three alternatives
where 1 is the most important:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Food production
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. Respondent are asked to select three options in R7KM7,
and rank these three from 1 -3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4253] [Invalid:436]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
541 |
70.9% |
0.7090433 |
| 2 |
|
125 |
16.4% |
0.1638270 |
| 3 |
|
97 |
12.7% |
0.1271298 |
| Sysmiss |
|
436 |
|
NA |
r7km7_4
|
Variable label:
|
How should your municipal authority prioritise the areas for food
production next ten years: Railway/Underground/Tramway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politicians must often choose whether areas that can be used to produce
food should be used for other necessary purposes.
How do you feel your municipal authority should prioritise the use of
such areas for the next ten years? Please rank up to three alternatives
where 1 is the most important:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Railway/Underground/Tramway etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. Respondent are asked to select three options in R7KM7,
and rank these three from 1 -3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4031] [Invalid:658]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
150 |
27.7% |
0.2772643 |
| 2 |
|
226 |
41.8% |
0.4177449 |
| 3 |
|
165 |
30.5% |
0.3049908 |
| Sysmiss |
|
658 |
|
NA |
r7km7_5
|
Variable label:
|
How should your municipal authority prioritise the areas for food
production next ten years: Commercial activity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politicians must often choose whether areas that can be used to produce
food should be used for other necessary purposes.
How do you feel your municipal authority should prioritise the use of
such areas for the next ten years? Please rank up to three alternatives
where 1 is the most important:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Commercial activity
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. Respondent are asked to select three options in R7KM7,
and rank these three from 1 -3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3919] [Invalid:770]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
89 |
20.7% |
0.2074592 |
| 2 |
|
173 |
40.3% |
0.4032634 |
| 3 |
|
167 |
38.9% |
0.3892774 |
| Sysmiss |
|
770 |
|
NA |
r7km7_6
|
Variable label:
|
How should your municipal authority prioritise the areas for food
production next ten years: Public buildings
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politicians must often choose whether areas that can be used to produce
food should be used for other necessary purposes.
How do you feel your municipal authority should prioritise the use of
such areas for the next ten years? Please rank up to three alternatives
where 1 is the most important:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Public buildings: School, sports etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. Respondent are asked to select three options in R7KM7,
and rank these three from 1 -3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4103] [Invalid:586]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
123 |
20.1% |
0.2006525 |
| 2 |
|
240 |
39.2% |
0.3915171 |
| 3 |
|
250 |
40.8% |
0.4078303 |
| Sysmiss |
|
586 |
|
NA |
r7km8
|
Variable label:
|
Would install solar panels if authorities cover half the cost
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you install solar panels/solar collectors if you could receive a
grant from the authorities to cover half the cost?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
645 |
53.8% |
0.537948290 |
| 2 |
No |
203 |
16.9% |
0.169307756 |
| 3 |
I have already installed solar panels/solar collectors |
10 |
0.8% |
0.008340284 |
| 4 |
It is not possible for me to install solar panels/solar collectors in practice |
304 |
25.4% |
0.253544621 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
3.1% |
0.030859049 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7km8_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Further comments [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should you have any further comment you may write it here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7ran3
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1182] [Invalid:3507]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
578 |
48.9% |
0.4890017 |
| 2 |
2 |
604 |
51.1% |
0.5109983 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3507 |
|
NA |
r7pilotkm1_10_1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Balance between using nature and desire not to harm it
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Our politicians often face difficult decisions. This certainly applies
to how to achieve a balance in terms of the needs of society to use
nature and the desire not to harm nature.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Considering the current situation in Norway, how do you feel the balance
is today?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Too much emphasis is placed on consideration to nature |
16 |
1.3% |
0.01334445 |
| 2 |
2 |
52 |
4.3% |
0.04336947 |
| 3 |
3 |
130 |
10.8% |
0.10842369 |
| 4 |
Good balance |
452 |
37.7% |
0.37698082 |
| 5 |
5 |
240 |
20.0% |
0.20016681 |
| 6 |
6 |
173 |
14.4% |
0.14428691 |
| 7 |
Too much emphasis is placed on consideration to society |
67 |
5.6% |
0.05587990 |
| 97 |
No answer |
69 |
5.8% |
0.05754796 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7pilotkm1_10_2
|
Variable label:
|
How should politicians prioritise between consideration to nature and to
society
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you feel politicians should prioritise between consideration to
nature and to society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran3=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Consideration to nature should in general go before social considerations. |
104 |
18.0% |
0.17993080 |
| 2 |
Harming nature to a lesser degree can be acceptable, but only when absolutely
necessary social considerations indicate this. |
433 |
74.9% |
0.74913495 |
| 3 |
Harming nature can be accepted, but only when absolutely necessary
considerations for society indicate this. |
35 |
6.1% |
0.06055363 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.0% |
0.01038062 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4111 |
|
NA |
r7pilotkm1_10_2_flipped
|
Variable label:
|
How should politicians prioritise between consideration to nature and to
society
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you feel politicians should prioritise between consideration to
nature and to society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran3=2. ]
[Compared to r7pilotkm1_10_2, scale flipped]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Harming nature can be accepted, but only when absolutely necessary
considerations for society indicate this. |
48 |
7.9% |
0.07947020 |
| 2 |
Harming nature to a lesser degree can be acceptable, but only when absolutely
necessary social considerations indicate this. |
423 |
70.0% |
0.70033113 |
| 3 |
Consideration to nature should in general go before social considerations. |
123 |
20.4% |
0.20364238 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.7% |
0.01655629 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4085 |
|
NA |
r7pilotkm1_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Further comments [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
You can write any comments you might have here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7ran4
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1182] [Invalid:3507]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
262 |
22.2% |
0.2216582 |
| 2 |
2 |
218 |
18.4% |
0.1844332 |
| 3 |
3 |
229 |
19.4% |
0.1937394 |
| 4 |
4 |
238 |
20.1% |
0.2013536 |
| 5 |
5 |
235 |
19.9% |
0.1988156 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3507 |
|
NA |
r7pilotkm2_s1
|
Variable label:
|
Start oil production or let the oil remain in LoVeSe: Opponent’s
argument
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the debate about oil and gas extraction in the area off Lofoten,
Vesterålen and Senja opponents argue that an accident causing a major
oil spillage will threaten the North Atlantic cod stocks that breed in
this area, and that based on climate considerations and international
obligations the speed of the extraction must be slowed down.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think, should we start oil and gas production in the area
off Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja or should we let the oil and gas in
this area remain where it is.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran4=1 AND ran40=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
We should start oil and gas production in the area off Lofoten, Vesterålen and
Senja. |
21 |
37.5% |
0.37500000 |
| 2 |
We should not start oil and gas production in the area off Lofoten, Vesterålen
and Senja. |
33 |
58.9% |
0.58928571 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4633 |
|
NA |
r7pilotkm2_s2
|
Variable label:
|
Start oil production or let the oil remain in LoVeSe: Proponent’s
argument
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the debate about oil and gas extraction in the area off Lofoten,
Vesterålen and Senja the proponents argue that the oil and gas
extraction is important for workplaces, and that security surrounding
the oil industry today is excellent and the chance of an accident
causing a major spillages is minimal.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think, should we start oil and gas production in the area
off Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja or should we let the oil and gas in
this area remain where it is.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran4=2 AND ran40=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
We should start oil and gas production in the area off Lofoten, Vesterålen and
Senja. |
25 |
47.2% |
0.47169811 |
| 2 |
We should not start oil and gas production in the area off Lofoten, Vesterålen
and Senja. |
25 |
47.2% |
0.47169811 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
5.7% |
0.05660377 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4636 |
|
NA |
r7pilotkm2_s3
|
Variable label:
|
Start oil production or let the oil remain in LoVeSe: Opponent’s
argument, then proponent’s argument
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the debate about oil and gas extraction in the area off Lofoten,
Vesterålen and Senja opponents argue that an accident causing a major
oil spillage will threaten the North Atlantic cod stocks that breed in
this area, and that based on climate considerations and international
obligations the speed of the extraction must be slowed down. However,
the the proponents argue that the oil and gas extraction is important
for workplaces, and that security surrounding the oil industry today is
excellent and the chance of an accident causing a major spillages is
minimal.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think, should we start oil and gas production in the area
off Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja or should we let the oil and gas in
this area remain where it is.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran4=3 AND ran40=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
We should start oil and gas production in the area off Lofoten, Vesterålen and
Senja. |
26 |
46.4% |
0.46428571 |
| 2 |
We should not start oil and gas production in the area off Lofoten, Vesterålen
and Senja. |
27 |
48.2% |
0.48214286 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
5.4% |
0.05357143 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4633 |
|
NA |
r7pilotkm2_s4
|
Variable label:
|
Start oil production or let the oil remain in LoVeSe: Proponent’s
argument, then opponent’s argument
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the debate about oil and gas extraction in the area off Lofoten,
Vesterålen and Senja the proponents argue that the oil and gas
extraction is important for workplaces, and that security surrounding
the oil industry today is excellent and the chance of an accident
causing a major spillages is minimal. However, the opponents argue that
an accident causing a major oil spillage will threaten the North
Atlantic cod stocks that breed in this area, and that based on climate
considerations and international obligations the speed of the extraction
must be slowed down.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think, should we start oil and gas production in the area
off Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja or should we let the oil and gas in
this area remain where it is.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran4=4 AND ran40=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
We should start oil and gas production in the area off Lofoten, Vesterålen and
Senja. |
23 |
41.1% |
0.41071429 |
| 2 |
We should not start oil and gas production in the area off Lofoten, Vesterålen
and Senja. |
31 |
55.4% |
0.55357143 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4633 |
|
NA |
r7pilotkm2_s5
|
Variable label:
|
Start oil production or let the oil remain in LoVeSe
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think, should we start oil and gas production in the area
off Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja or should we let the oil and gas in
this area remain where it is.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran4=5 AND ran40=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
We should start oil and gas production in the area off Lofoten, Vesterålen and
Senja. |
29 |
43.9% |
0.43939394 |
| 2 |
We should not start oil and gas production in the area off Lofoten, Vesterålen
and Senja. |
33 |
50.0% |
0.50000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
6.1% |
0.06060606 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4623 |
|
NA |
r7pilotkm2_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Comments [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
You can write any comments you might have here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran40=4. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7km10_1
|
Variable label:
|
Which illnesses would you like to be treated with antibiotics: Sinusitis
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following illnesses would you like to be treated with
antibiotics? It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sinusitis
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Sinusitis |
524 |
43.7% |
0.43703086 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
1.5% |
0.01501251 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
657 |
54.8% |
0.54795663 |
r7km10_2
|
Variable label:
|
Which illnesses would you like to be treated with antibiotics:
Bronchitis
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following illnesses would you like to be treated with
antibiotics? It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Bronchitis
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Bronchitis |
394 |
32.9% |
0.32860717 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
1.5% |
0.01501251 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
787 |
65.6% |
0.65638032 |
r7km10_3
|
Variable label:
|
Which illnesses would you like to be treated with antibiotics: The
common cold
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following illnesses would you like to be treated with
antibiotics? It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The common cold
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The common cold |
15 |
1.3% |
0.01251043 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
1.5% |
0.01501251 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1166 |
97.2% |
0.97247706 |
r7km10_4
|
Variable label:
|
Which illnesses would you like to be treated with antibiotics:
Streptococci
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following illnesses would you like to be treated with
antibiotics? It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Throat infection (streptococci)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Throat infection (streptococci) |
732 |
61.1% |
0.61050876 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
1.5% |
0.01501251 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
449 |
37.4% |
0.37447873 |
r7km10_5
|
Variable label:
|
Which illnesses would you like to be treated with antibiotics: Influenza
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following illnesses would you like to be treated with
antibiotics? It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Influenza
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Influenza |
101 |
8.4% |
0.08423686 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
1.5% |
0.01501251 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1080 |
90.1% |
0.90075063 |
r7km10_6
|
Variable label:
|
Which illnesses would you like to be treated with antibiotics: Ear
infection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following illnesses would you like to be treated with
antibiotics? It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Ear infection
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Ear infection |
540 |
45.0% |
0.45037531 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
1.5% |
0.01501251 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
641 |
53.5% |
0.53461218 |
r7km10_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Comments [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
You can write any comments you might have here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7km12_1
|
Variable label:
|
Most important reason for consulting doctor when respiratory infection:
Symptoms last longer than expected
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There might be several reasons for consulting a doctor when suffering
from a respiratory infection. What is the most important reason for you?
A respiratory infection is in a group of illnesses which for example can
cause coughing, a bunged up/runny nose, fever, pains in the throat,
pains in the ears, exhaustion etc. It is possible to mark more than one
answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
That the symptoms last longer than I expect
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
That the symptoms last longer than I expect |
623 |
52.0% |
0.51959967 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01584654 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
557 |
46.5% |
0.46455379 |
r7km12_2
|
Variable label:
|
Most important reason for consulting doctor when respiratory infection:
Symptoms more severe than expected
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There might be several reasons for consulting a doctor when suffering
from a respiratory infection. What is the most important reason for you?
A respiratory infection is in a group of illnesses which for example can
cause coughing, a bunged up/runny nose, fever, pains in the throat,
pains in the ears, exhaustion etc. It is possible to mark more than one
answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
That the symptoms are much more severe than I expect
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
That the symptoms are much more severe than I expect |
659 |
55.0% |
0.54962469 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01584654 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
521 |
43.5% |
0.43452877 |
r7km12_3
|
Variable label:
|
Most important reason for consulting doctor when respiratory infection:
Need a doctor’s certificate
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There might be several reasons for consulting a doctor when suffering
from a respiratory infection. What is the most important reason for you?
A respiratory infection is in a group of illnesses which for example can
cause coughing, a bunged up/runny nose, fever, pains in the throat,
pains in the ears, exhaustion etc. It is possible to mark more than one
answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
That I need a doctor’s certificate
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
That I need a doctor’s certificate |
240 |
20.0% |
0.20016681 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01584654 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
940 |
78.4% |
0.78398666 |
r7km12_4
|
Variable label:
|
Most important reason for consulting doctor when respiratory infection:
Encouraged by others
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There might be several reasons for consulting a doctor when suffering
from a respiratory infection. What is the most important reason for you?
A respiratory infection is in a group of illnesses which for example can
cause coughing, a bunged up/runny nose, fever, pains in the throat,
pains in the ears, exhaustion etc. It is possible to mark more than one
answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
That others (family, friends) encourage me to visit the doctor
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
That others (family, friends) encourage me to visit the doctor |
170 |
14.2% |
0.14178482 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01584654 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1010 |
84.2% |
0.84236864 |
r7km12_5
|
Variable label:
|
Most important reason for consulting doctor when respiratory infection:
Others I know with similar symptoms were helped
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There might be several reasons for consulting a doctor when suffering
from a respiratory infection. What is the most important reason for you?
A respiratory infection is in a group of illnesses which for example can
cause coughing, a bunged up/runny nose, fever, pains in the throat,
pains in the ears, exhaustion etc. It is possible to mark more than one
answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
That others I know with similar symptoms were helped by the doctor
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
That others I know with similar symptoms were helped by the doctor |
28 |
2.3% |
0.02335279 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01584654 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1152 |
96.1% |
0.96080067 |
r7km12_6
|
Variable label:
|
Most important reason for consulting doctor when respiratory infection:
Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There might be several reasons for consulting a doctor when suffering
from a respiratory infection. What is the most important reason for you?
A respiratory infection is in a group of illnesses which for example can
cause coughing, a bunged up/runny nose, fever, pains in the throat,
pains in the ears, exhaustion etc. It is possible to mark more than one
answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, note
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, note |
51 |
4.3% |
0.04253545 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01584654 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1129 |
94.2% |
0.94161802 |
r7km12_6_other
|
Variable label:
|
Most important reason for consulting doctor when respiratory infection:
Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There might be several reasons for consulting a doctor when suffering
from a respiratory infection. What is the most important reason for you?
A respiratory infection is in a group of illnesses which for example can
cause coughing, a bunged up/runny nose, fever, pains in the throat,
pains in the ears, exhaustion etc. It is possible to mark more than one
answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, note
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7km12_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Comments [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
You can write any comments you might have here:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7dvm1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: A rejected adult asylum seeker should be allowed
residence if the children are entitled to live in the country
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we would like to know something about your views about society in
general, and about the new diversity in Norway.
Even if an adult asylum seeker has been rejected, the government may
consider allowing residence if the children are entitled to live in the
country.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that an asylum seeker who has been
rejected should be allowed to stay in such cases?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
182 |
15.2% |
0.15179316 |
| 2 |
Agree |
354 |
29.5% |
0.29524604 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
262 |
21.9% |
0.21851543 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
98 |
8.2% |
0.08173478 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
104 |
8.7% |
0.08673895 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
84 |
7.0% |
0.07005838 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
85 |
7.1% |
0.07089241 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02502085 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7ran11
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2, R4DV29_1=97/98 and the respondent is recruited in
wave 3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:631] [Invalid:4058]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
226 |
35.8% |
0.3581616 |
| 2 |
2 |
195 |
30.9% |
0.3090333 |
| 3 |
3 |
210 |
33.3% |
0.3328051 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4058 |
|
NA |
r7dvm2a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Begging should be prohibited in Norway, Austrian
Constitutional Court
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last three years the Constitutional Court (Austria) has ruled
that a prohibition against begging was an illegal intervention on the
basis of freedom of speech.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that begging should be
prohibited in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran11=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
43 |
19.0% |
0.19026549 |
| 2 |
Agree |
47 |
20.8% |
0.20796460 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
38 |
16.8% |
0.16814159 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
30 |
13.3% |
0.13274336 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
27 |
11.9% |
0.11946903 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
27 |
11.9% |
0.11946903 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
10 |
4.4% |
0.04424779 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.8% |
0.01769912 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4463 |
|
NA |
r7dvm2b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Begging should be prohibited in Norway, US Federal Court
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last three years the US Federal Court has ruled that a
prohibition against begging was an illegal intervention on the basis of
freedom of speech.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that begging should be
prohibited in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran11=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
43 |
22.1% |
0.220512821 |
| 2 |
Agree |
28 |
14.4% |
0.143589744 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
46 |
23.6% |
0.235897436 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
24 |
12.3% |
0.123076923 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
13 |
6.7% |
0.066666667 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
24 |
12.3% |
0.123076923 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
8.2% |
0.082051282 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005128205 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4494 |
|
NA |
r7dvm2c
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Begging should be prohibited in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that begging should be
prohibited in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran11=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
51 |
24.3% |
0.242857143 |
| 2 |
Agree |
42 |
20.0% |
0.200000000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
39 |
18.6% |
0.185714286 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
22 |
10.5% |
0.104761905 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
17 |
8.1% |
0.080952381 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
21 |
10.0% |
0.100000000 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
8.1% |
0.080952381 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004761905 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4479 |
|
NA |
r7ran12
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1179] [Invalid:3510]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
130 |
11.0% |
0.1102629 |
| 2 |
2 |
136 |
11.5% |
0.1153520 |
| 3 |
3 |
129 |
10.9% |
0.1094148 |
| 4 |
4 |
138 |
11.7% |
0.1170483 |
| 5 |
5 |
132 |
11.2% |
0.1119593 |
| 6 |
6 |
134 |
11.4% |
0.1136556 |
| 7 |
7 |
126 |
10.7% |
0.1068702 |
| 8 |
8 |
119 |
10.1% |
0.1009330 |
| 9 |
9 |
135 |
11.5% |
0.1145038 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3510 |
|
NA |
r7dv13a
|
Variable label:
|
Would you have signed: Petition against closing local casualty clinic,
1% signed, people you know/respect
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following situation: Politicians are planning to close the
casualty clinic closest to you in order to extend the capacity at the
nearest hospital. Meaning your journey will be longer should you be in
need of immediate medical assistance. A petition against the closure has
been established, and it has been published on the internet.
Approximately 1 % of the inhabitants of your municipality have signed
the petition, and among them people you know and respect.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have signed the petition?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran12=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
80 |
61.5% |
0.615384615 |
| 2 |
No |
49 |
37.7% |
0.376923077 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.007692308 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4559 |
|
NA |
r7dv13b
|
Variable label:
|
Would you have signed: Petition against closing local casualty clinic,
1% signed, people you don’t agree with politically
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following situation: Politicians are planning to close the
casualty clinic closest to you in order to extend the capacity at the
nearest hospital. Meaning your journey will be longer should you be in
need of immediate medical assistance. A petition against the closure has
been established, and it has been published on the internet.
Approximately 1 % of the inhabitants of your municipality have signed
the petition, and among them people you usually don’t agree with
politically.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have signed the petition?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran12=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
98 |
72.1% |
0.72058824 |
| 2 |
No |
34 |
25.0% |
0.25000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.9% |
0.02941176 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4553 |
|
NA |
r7dv13c
|
Variable label:
|
Would you have signed: Petition against closing local casualty clinic,
10% signed, people you know/respect
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following situation: Politicians are planning to close the
casualty clinic closest to you in order to extend the capacity at the
nearest hospital. Meaning your journey will be longer should you be in
need of immediate medical assistance. A petition against the closure has
been established, and it has been published on the internet.
Approximately 10 % of the inhabitants of your municipality have signed
the petition, and among them people you know and respect.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have signed the petition?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran12=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
80 |
62.0% |
0.62015504 |
| 2 |
No |
45 |
34.9% |
0.34883721 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.1% |
0.03100775 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4560 |
|
NA |
r7dv13d
|
Variable label:
|
Would you have signed: Petition against closing local casualty clinic,
10% signed, people you don’t agree with politically
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following situation: Politicians are planning to close the
casualty clinic closest to you in order to extend the capacity at the
nearest hospital. Meaning your journey will be longer should you be in
need of immediate medical assistance. A petition against the closure has
been established, and it has been published on the internet.
Approximately 10 % of the inhabitants of your municipality have signed
the petition, and among them people you usually don’t agree with
politically.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have signed the petition?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran12=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
95 |
68.8% |
0.68840580 |
| 2 |
No |
41 |
29.7% |
0.29710145 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.4% |
0.01449275 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4551 |
|
NA |
r7dv13e
|
Variable label:
|
Would you have signed: Petition against closing local casualty clinic,
30% signed, people you know/respect
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following situation: Politicians are planning to close the
casualty clinic closest to you in order to extend the capacity at the
nearest hospital. Meaning your journey will be longer should you be in
need of immediate medical assistance. A petition against the closure has
been established, and it has been published on the internet.
Approximately 30 % of the inhabitants of your municipality have signed
the petition, and among them people you know and respect.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have signed the petition?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran12=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
88 |
66.7% |
0.66666667 |
| 2 |
No |
42 |
31.8% |
0.31818182 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.5% |
0.01515152 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4557 |
|
NA |
r7dv13f
|
Variable label:
|
Would you have signed: Petition against closing local casualty clinic,
30% signed, people you don’t agree with politically
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following situation: Politicians are planning to close the
casualty clinic closest to you in order to extend the capacity at the
nearest hospital. Meaning your journey will be longer should you be in
need of immediate medical assistance. A petition against the closure has
been established, and it has been published on the internet.
Approximately 30 % of the inhabitants of your municipality have signed
the petition, and among them people you usually don’t agree with
politically.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have signed the petition?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran12=6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
107 |
79.9% |
0.798507463 |
| 2 |
No |
26 |
19.4% |
0.194029851 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.7% |
0.007462687 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4555 |
|
NA |
r7dv13g
|
Variable label:
|
Would you have signed: Petition against closing local casualty clinic,
1% signed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following situation: Politicians are planning to close the
casualty clinic closest to you in order to extend the capacity at the
nearest hospital. Meaning your journey will be longer should you be in
need of immediate medical assistance. A petition against the closure has
been established, and it has been published on the internet.
Approximately 1 % of the inhabitants of your municipality have signed
the petition.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have signed the petition?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran12=7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
71 |
56.3% |
0.563492063 |
| 2 |
No |
54 |
42.9% |
0.428571429 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.007936508 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
r7dv13h
|
Variable label:
|
Would you have signed: Petition against closing local casualty clinic,
10% signed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following situation: Politicians are planning to close the
casualty clinic closest to you in order to extend the capacity at the
nearest hospital. Meaning your journey will be longer should you be in
need of immediate medical assistance. A petition against the closure has
been established, and it has been published on the internet.
Approximately 10 % of the inhabitants of your municipality have signed
the petition.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have signed the petition?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran12=8. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
70 |
58.8% |
0.588235294 |
| 2 |
No |
48 |
40.3% |
0.403361345 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008403361 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4570 |
|
NA |
r7dv13i
|
Variable label:
|
Would you have signed: Petition against closing local casualty clinic,
30% signed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following situation: Politicians are planning to close the
casualty clinic closest to you in order to extend the capacity at the
nearest hospital. Meaning your journey will be longer should you be in
need of immediate medical assistance. A petition against the closure has
been established, and it has been published on the internet.
Approximately 30 % of the inhabitants of your municipality have signed
the petition.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have signed the petition?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran12=9. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
92 |
68.1% |
0.68148148 |
| 2 |
No |
40 |
29.6% |
0.29629630 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r7dv13_2
|
Variable label:
|
Probability of such an action succeeding
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you assess the probability of such an action succeeding?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very likely |
18 |
1.5% |
0.01501251 |
| 2 |
Likely |
91 |
7.6% |
0.07589658 |
| 3 |
Somewhat likely |
416 |
34.7% |
0.34695580 |
| 4 |
Slightly likely |
562 |
46.9% |
0.46872394 |
| 5 |
Not likely at all |
79 |
6.6% |
0.06588824 |
| 97 |
No answer |
33 |
2.8% |
0.02752294 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7dv13_3
|
Variable label:
|
Has participated in a petition on the internet
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you ever participated in a petition on the internet?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, several times |
327 |
27.3% |
0.27272727 |
| 2 |
Yes, once |
184 |
15.3% |
0.15346122 |
| 3 |
No |
658 |
54.9% |
0.54879066 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02502085 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3490 |
|
NA |
r7dv13_3b
|
Variable label:
|
What was the last action you participated in about? [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What was the last action you participated in about?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and R7DV13_3=1. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7dv13_3c
|
Variable label:
|
What was the action you participated in about? [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What was the action you participated in about?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and R7DV13_3=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7ran6
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1178] [Invalid:3511]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
187 |
15.9% |
0.1587436 |
| 2 |
2 |
221 |
18.8% |
0.1876061 |
| 3 |
3 |
199 |
16.9% |
0.1689304 |
| 4 |
4 |
195 |
16.6% |
0.1655348 |
| 5 |
5 |
185 |
15.7% |
0.1570458 |
| 6 |
6 |
191 |
16.2% |
0.1621392 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3511 |
|
NA |
r7mi5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Text books for school should be written, more emphasis
on the new cultural diversity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Text books for primary and lower secondary school should be written with
more emphasis on the new cultural diversity in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran6=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
11 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
| 2 |
Agree |
38 |
20.3% |
0.20320856 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
47 |
25.1% |
0.25133690 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
34 |
18.2% |
0.18181818 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
16 |
8.6% |
0.08556150 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
25 |
13.4% |
0.13368984 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
13 |
7.0% |
0.06951872 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.6% |
0.01604278 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4502 |
|
NA |
r7mi5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Text books for school should be written, reflect the new
cultural diversity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Text books for primary and lower secondary school should be written to
reflect the new cultural diversity in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran6=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
34 |
15.4% |
0.15384615 |
| 2 |
Agree |
65 |
29.4% |
0.29411765 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
52 |
23.5% |
0.23529412 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
30 |
13.6% |
0.13574661 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
15 |
6.8% |
0.06787330 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
13 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
5.4% |
0.05429864 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4468 |
|
NA |
r7mi5_3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Text books for school should be written, less emphasis
on new ideas about cultural diversity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Text books for primary and lower secondary school should be written with
less emphasis on new ideas about cultural diversity in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran6=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
5 |
2.5% |
0.02512563 |
| 2 |
Agree |
11 |
5.5% |
0.05527638 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
26 |
13.1% |
0.13065327 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
54 |
27.1% |
0.27135678 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
30 |
15.1% |
0.15075377 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
46 |
23.1% |
0.23115578 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
24 |
12.1% |
0.12060302 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01507538 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4490 |
|
NA |
r7mi5_4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Text books for school should be re-written, more
emphasis on the new cultural diversity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Text books for primary and lower secondary school should be re-written
in order to place more emphasis on the new cultural diversity in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran6=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
5 |
2.6% |
0.025641026 |
| 2 |
Agree |
41 |
21.0% |
0.210256410 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
53 |
27.2% |
0.271794872 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
36 |
18.5% |
0.184615385 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
17 |
8.7% |
0.087179487 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
27 |
13.8% |
0.138461538 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
7.7% |
0.076923077 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005128205 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4494 |
|
NA |
r7mi5_5
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Text books for school should be re-written, reflect the
new cultural diversity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Text books for primary and lower secondary school should be re-written
to reflect the new cultural diversity in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran6=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
17 |
9.2% |
0.091891892 |
| 2 |
Agree |
32 |
17.3% |
0.172972973 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
49 |
26.5% |
0.264864865 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
27 |
14.6% |
0.145945946 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
27 |
14.6% |
0.145945946 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
22 |
11.9% |
0.118918919 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
10 |
5.4% |
0.054054054 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005405405 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4504 |
|
NA |
r7mi5_6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Text books for school should be re-written, less
emphasis on new ideas about cultural diversity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Text books for primary and lower secondary school should be re-written
with less emphasis on new ideas about cultural diversity in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran6=6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 2 |
Agree |
13 |
6.8% |
0.06806283 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
25 |
13.1% |
0.13089005 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
75 |
39.3% |
0.39267016 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
18 |
9.4% |
0.09424084 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
37 |
19.4% |
0.19371728 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
20 |
10.5% |
0.10471204 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.6% |
0.01570681 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4498 |
|
NA |
r7dvby1
|
Variable label:
|
How safe/unsafe do you feel your local area is?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we would like to know something about your views about society in
general, and about the new diversity in Norway.
Consider your local area.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How safe or unsafe do you feel it is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 OR u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very safe |
829 |
35.9% |
0.359496964 |
| 2 |
Safe |
1133 |
49.1% |
0.491326973 |
| 3 |
Somewhat safe |
158 |
6.9% |
0.068516912 |
| 4 |
Neither safe nor unsafe |
54 |
2.3% |
0.023417173 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unsafe |
71 |
3.1% |
0.030789245 |
| 6 |
Unsafe |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007805724 |
| 7 |
Very unsafe |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001734605 |
| 97 |
No answer |
39 |
1.7% |
0.016912402 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2383 |
|
NA |
r7dvby2
|
Variable label:
|
Has your local area become safer/more unsafe/no change last couple of
years
|
|
Literal question:
|
In the last couple of years would you say your local area has become
safer, more unsafe or has there been no change to safety?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 OR u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Safer |
98 |
4.2% |
0.04249783 |
| 2 |
More unsafe |
476 |
20.6% |
0.20641804 |
| 3 |
No change to safety |
1692 |
73.4% |
0.73373807 |
| 97 |
No answer |
40 |
1.7% |
0.01734605 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2383 |
|
NA |
r7dv5
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very great advantage |
26 |
2.2% |
0.02161264 |
| 2 |
Great advantage |
175 |
14.5% |
0.14546966 |
| 3 |
An advantage to some extent |
419 |
34.8% |
0.34829593 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
189 |
15.7% |
0.15710723 |
| 5 |
A disadvantage to some extent |
241 |
20.0% |
0.20033250 |
| 6 |
Great disadvantage |
92 |
7.6% |
0.07647548 |
| 7 |
Very great disadvantage |
44 |
3.7% |
0.03657523 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.4% |
0.01413134 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
r7dv6
|
Variable label:
|
How important is immigration policy to you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
152 |
12.6% |
0.12635079 |
| 2 |
Important |
466 |
38.7% |
0.38736492 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
440 |
36.6% |
0.36575229 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
113 |
9.4% |
0.09393184 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
15 |
1.2% |
0.01246883 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.4% |
0.01413134 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
r7dv7
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
210 |
17.5% |
0.174563591 |
| 2 |
The Progress Party |
306 |
25.4% |
0.254364090 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party |
158 |
13.1% |
0.131338321 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
92 |
7.6% |
0.076475478 |
| 5 |
The Centre Party |
29 |
2.4% |
0.024106401 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democrats |
68 |
5.7% |
0.056525353 |
| 7 |
The Liberal Party |
59 |
4.9% |
0.049044057 |
| 8 |
The Red Party |
21 |
1.7% |
0.017456359 |
| 9 |
The Green Party |
6 |
0.5% |
0.004987531 |
| 10 |
Other |
14 |
1.2% |
0.011637573 |
| 11 |
None |
195 |
16.2% |
0.162094763 |
| 97 |
No answer |
45 |
3.7% |
0.037406484 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
r7dv7_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy, other [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7ran7
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1192] [Invalid:3497]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
196 |
16.4% |
0.1644295 |
| 2 |
2 |
208 |
17.4% |
0.1744966 |
| 3 |
3 |
199 |
16.7% |
0.1669463 |
| 4 |
4 |
186 |
15.6% |
0.1560403 |
| 5 |
5 |
198 |
16.6% |
0.1661074 |
| 6 |
6 |
205 |
17.2% |
0.1719799 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3497 |
|
NA |
r7dvex1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Should party be prohibited from standing for election: You disagree with
all standpoints
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a political party where you strongly disagree with all
their standpoints wishes to stand for election to the Storting in Norway
in the autumn.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel that such a party should be prohibited from standing for
election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran7=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
27 |
13.8% |
0.13775510 |
| 2 |
No |
167 |
85.2% |
0.85204082 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.0% |
0.01020408 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4493 |
|
NA |
r7dvex1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Should party be prohibited from standing for election: Promotes
undemocratic values
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a political party that promotes undemocratic values wishes
to stand for election to the Storting in Norway in the autumn.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel that such a party should be prohibited from standing for
election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran7=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
94 |
45.2% |
0.45192308 |
| 2 |
No |
105 |
50.5% |
0.50480769 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
4.3% |
0.04326923 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4481 |
|
NA |
r7dvex1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Should party be prohibited from standing for election: Does not respect
democratic ground rules
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a political party that does not respect democratic ground
rules wishes to stand for election to the Storting in Norway in the
autumn.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel that such a party should be prohibited from standing for
election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran7=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
95 |
47.7% |
0.47738693 |
| 2 |
No |
99 |
49.7% |
0.49748744 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.5% |
0.02512563 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4490 |
|
NA |
r7dvex1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Should party be prohibited from standing for election: Does not respect
Norwegian legislation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a political party that does not respect Norwegian
legislation wishes to stand for election to the Storting in Norway in
the autumn.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel that such a party should be prohibited from standing for
election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran7=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
119 |
64.0% |
0.63978495 |
| 2 |
No |
65 |
34.9% |
0.34946237 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.1% |
0.01075269 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4503 |
|
NA |
r7dvex1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Should party be prohibited from standing for election: Used violence to
achieve its goals
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a political party that has used violence to achieve its
goals wishes to stand for election to the Storting in Norway in the
autumn.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel that such a party should be prohibited from standing for
election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran7=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
134 |
67.7% |
0.67676768 |
| 2 |
No |
61 |
30.8% |
0.30808081 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01515152 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4491 |
|
NA |
r7dvex1_6
|
Variable label:
|
Should party be prohibited from standing for election: Responsible for a
terrorist attack
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a political party that is responsible for a terrorist
attack wishes to stand for election to the Storting in Norway in the
autumn.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel that such a party should be prohibited from standing for
election?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran7=6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
135 |
65.9% |
0.658536585 |
| 2 |
No |
68 |
33.2% |
0.331707317 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.0% |
0.009756098 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4484 |
|
NA |
r7dvby5
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you spot persons you believe/know to be asylum seekers
during a normal week
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you spot persons you believe or know to be asylum seekers
where you go during a normal week?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 OR u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never |
181 |
7.8% |
0.07849089 |
| 2 |
Once a week |
436 |
18.9% |
0.18907199 |
| 3 |
2-3 times a week |
523 |
22.7% |
0.22679965 |
| 4 |
4-6 times a week |
289 |
12.5% |
0.12532524 |
| 5 |
Daily |
536 |
23.2% |
0.23243712 |
| 6 |
Several times a day |
278 |
12.1% |
0.12055507 |
| 97 |
No answer |
63 |
2.7% |
0.02732003 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2383 |
|
NA |
r7dvby6
|
Variable label:
|
Amount of contact with asylum seekers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested to know how much contact you have had with asylum
seekers.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that you have had….
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 OR u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No contact |
647 |
28.1% |
0.28057242 |
| 2 |
Very little contact |
785 |
34.0% |
0.34041631 |
| 3 |
A little contact |
454 |
19.7% |
0.19687771 |
| 4 |
Some contact |
200 |
8.7% |
0.08673027 |
| 5 |
Quite a bit of contact |
76 |
3.3% |
0.03295750 |
| 6 |
A lot of contact |
53 |
2.3% |
0.02298352 |
| 7 |
Quite a lot of contact |
27 |
1.2% |
0.01170859 |
| 97 |
No answer |
64 |
2.8% |
0.02775369 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2383 |
|
NA |
r7dvby7
|
Variable label:
|
Contact with asylum seekers has been positive/negative
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what degree have you found the contact you have had to be
negative or positive.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 OR u=4, and if R7DVBY6>1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Exclusively negative |
12 |
0.6% |
0.005955335 |
| 2 |
Mostly negative |
52 |
2.6% |
0.025806452 |
| 3 |
Somewhat more negative than positive |
88 |
4.4% |
0.043672457 |
| 4 |
A mixture of negative and positive |
347 |
17.2% |
0.172208437 |
| 5 |
Somewhat more positive than negative |
237 |
11.8% |
0.117617866 |
| 6 |
Mostly positive |
622 |
30.9% |
0.308684864 |
| 7 |
Exclusively positive |
204 |
10.1% |
0.101240695 |
| 97 |
No answer |
453 |
22.5% |
0.224813896 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2674 |
|
NA |
r7dvby8
|
Variable label:
|
Has asylum seekers’ centre in local area
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Recently more asylum seekers’ centres have been both established and
closed down in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have an asylum seekers’ centre in your local area?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 OR u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
698 |
30.3% |
0.30268864 |
| 2 |
No |
1164 |
50.5% |
0.50477016 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
391 |
17.0% |
0.16955768 |
| 97 |
No answer |
53 |
2.3% |
0.02298352 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2383 |
|
NA |
r7dvby8aja
|
Variable label:
|
When was the asylum seekers’ centre established?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you able to estimate when the asylum seekers’ centre was
established?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and R7DVBY8=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Recently (last half of 2016) |
10 |
3.2% |
0.032362460 |
| 2 |
Earlier this year (first half of 2016) |
36 |
11.7% |
0.116504854 |
| 3 |
In the Autumn last year (last half of 2015) |
71 |
23.0% |
0.229773463 |
| 4 |
In the Spring last year (first half of 2015) |
35 |
11.3% |
0.113268608 |
| 5 |
2 years ago (approximately 2014) |
33 |
10.7% |
0.106796117 |
| 6 |
3 years ago (approximately 2013) |
10 |
3.2% |
0.032362460 |
| 7 |
4 years ago (approximately 2012) |
16 |
5.2% |
0.051779935 |
| 8 |
5 years ago (approximately 2011) |
19 |
6.1% |
0.061488673 |
| 9 |
6 years or more ago (approximately 2010 or earlier) |
77 |
24.9% |
0.249190939 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006472492 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4380 |
|
NA |
r7dvby8bja
|
Variable label:
|
Distance from asylum seekers’ centre to where you live
|
|
Literal question:
|
Approximately what distance is it from the Asylum seekers’ centre to
where you live?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and R7DVBY8=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Asylum seekers’ centre is next door |
15 |
4.9% |
0.04854369 |
| 2 |
1 km |
48 |
15.5% |
0.15533981 |
| 3 |
2 km |
46 |
14.9% |
0.14886731 |
| 4 |
3 km |
44 |
14.2% |
0.14239482 |
| 5 |
4 km |
30 |
9.7% |
0.09708738 |
| 6 |
5 km |
37 |
12.0% |
0.11974110 |
| 7 |
More than 5 km |
89 |
28.8% |
0.28802589 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4380 |
|
NA |
r7dvby8anei
|
Variable label:
|
Have you had an asylum seekers’ centre in your local area previously?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you had an asylum seekers’ centre in your local area previously?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and R7DVBY8>1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
133 |
16.8% |
0.16750630 |
| 2 |
No |
434 |
54.7% |
0.54659950 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
197 |
24.8% |
0.24811083 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
3.8% |
0.03778338 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3895 |
|
NA |
r7dvby8aneija1
|
Variable label:
|
When was the asylum seekers’ centre closed down?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you able to estimate when the asylum seekers’ centre was closed
down?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and R7DVBY8aNEI=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Recently (last half of 2016) |
21 |
15.8% |
0.15789474 |
| 2 |
Earlier this year (first half of 2016) |
36 |
27.1% |
0.27067669 |
| 3 |
In the Autumn last year (last half of 2015) |
10 |
7.5% |
0.07518797 |
| 4 |
In the Spring last year (first half of 2015) |
6 |
4.5% |
0.04511278 |
| 5 |
2 years ago (approximately 2014) |
12 |
9.0% |
0.09022556 |
| 6 |
3 years ago (approximately 2013) |
7 |
5.3% |
0.05263158 |
| 7 |
4 years ago (approximately 2012) |
7 |
5.3% |
0.05263158 |
| 8 |
5 years ago (approximately 2011) |
5 |
3.8% |
0.03759398 |
| 9 |
6 years or more ago (approximately 2010 or earlier) |
26 |
19.5% |
0.19548872 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.3% |
0.02255639 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4556 |
|
NA |
r7dvby8aneija2
|
Variable label:
|
Distance from closed down asylum seekers’ centre to where you live
|
|
Literal question:
|
Approximately what distance was it from the Asylum seekers’ centre to
where you live?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and R7DVBY8aNEI=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Asylum seekers’ centre was next door |
10 |
7.5% |
0.075187970 |
| 2 |
1 km |
26 |
19.5% |
0.195488722 |
| 3 |
2 km |
22 |
16.5% |
0.165413534 |
| 4 |
3 km |
20 |
15.0% |
0.150375940 |
| 5 |
4 km |
14 |
10.5% |
0.105263158 |
| 6 |
5 km |
13 |
9.8% |
0.097744361 |
| 7 |
More than 5 km |
27 |
20.3% |
0.203007519 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.007518797 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4556 |
|
NA |
r7dvby8aja1
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion about having asylum seekers’ centre in local area
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion about having an asylum seekers’ centre in your
local area?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 OR u=4, and if R7DVBY8=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It is OK |
395 |
56.6% |
0.565902579 |
| 2 |
It is not OK |
140 |
20.1% |
0.200573066 |
| 3 |
It doesn't matter |
159 |
22.8% |
0.227793696 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.6% |
0.005730659 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3991 |
|
NA |
r7dvby8anei1
|
Variable label:
|
Opinion about getting asylum seekers’ centre in local area
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion about getting an asylum seekers’ centre in your
local area?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 OR u=4, and if R7DVBY8>1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It is OK |
563 |
35.0% |
0.35012438 |
| 2 |
It is not OK |
484 |
30.1% |
0.30099502 |
| 3 |
It doesn't matter |
494 |
30.7% |
0.30721393 |
| 97 |
No answer |
67 |
4.2% |
0.04166667 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3081 |
|
NA |
r7dvby9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Experience of receiving many asylum seekers recently: Said hello
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been?
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Said hello to some of the asylum seekers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
400 |
36.3% |
0.3626473 |
| 2 |
No |
472 |
42.8% |
0.4279238 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
171 |
15.5% |
0.1550317 |
| 97 |
No answer |
60 |
5.4% |
0.0543971 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7dvby9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Experience of receiving many asylum seekers recently: Contact via the
internet
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been?
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Had contact via the internet with asylum seekers (for example Facebook
or Finn).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
52 |
4.7% |
0.04714415 |
| 2 |
No |
792 |
71.8% |
0.71804170 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
178 |
16.1% |
0.16137806 |
| 97 |
No answer |
81 |
7.3% |
0.07343608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7dvby9_3
|
Variable label:
|
Experience of receiving many asylum seekers recently: Become friends
with some
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been?
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Become friends with some of the asylum seekers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
80 |
7.3% |
0.07252947 |
| 2 |
No |
789 |
71.5% |
0.71532185 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
158 |
14.3% |
0.14324569 |
| 97 |
No answer |
76 |
6.9% |
0.06890299 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7dvby9_4
|
Variable label:
|
Experience of receiving many asylum seekers recently: Recieved
assistance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been?
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Received assistance from one or more asylum seekers.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
43 |
3.9% |
0.03898459 |
| 2 |
No |
815 |
73.9% |
0.73889393 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
163 |
14.8% |
0.14777879 |
| 97 |
No answer |
82 |
7.4% |
0.07434270 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7dvby9_5
|
Variable label:
|
Experience of receiving many asylum seekers recently: Become member of
support group
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been?
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Become a member of a support group for asylum seekers (for example on
the net).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
55 |
5.0% |
0.04986401 |
| 2 |
No |
833 |
75.5% |
0.75521306 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
136 |
12.3% |
0.12330009 |
| 97 |
No answer |
79 |
7.2% |
0.07162285 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7dvby9_6
|
Variable label:
|
Experience of receiving many asylum seekers recently: Expressed
scepticism
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been?
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Expressed scepticism to asylum seekers to others.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
200 |
18.1% |
0.18132366 |
| 2 |
No |
711 |
64.5% |
0.64460562 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
114 |
10.3% |
0.10335449 |
| 97 |
No answer |
78 |
7.1% |
0.07071623 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7dvby9_7
|
Variable label:
|
Experience of receiving many asylum seekers recently: Avoided as far as
possible
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway has received many asylum seekers recently. People have had
different experiences of this. What have your experiences been?
I have:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Avoided the asylum seekers as far as possible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
70 |
6.3% |
0.06346328 |
| 2 |
No |
770 |
69.8% |
0.69809610 |
| 3 |
Not relevant |
184 |
16.7% |
0.16681777 |
| 97 |
No answer |
79 |
7.2% |
0.07162285 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7dvby9_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Other experiences [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
I have other experiences.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please write:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7dvby10_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling about asylum seekers as a group: Admiration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
28 |
2.5% |
0.02538531 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
146 |
13.2% |
0.13236627 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
388 |
35.2% |
0.35176791 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
295 |
26.7% |
0.26745240 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
151 |
13.7% |
0.13689937 |
| 97 |
No answer |
95 |
8.6% |
0.08612874 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7dvby10_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling about asylum seekers as a group: Sympathy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sympathy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
164 |
14.9% |
0.14868540 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
457 |
41.4% |
0.41432457 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
337 |
30.6% |
0.30553037 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
62 |
5.6% |
0.05621034 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
35 |
3.2% |
0.03173164 |
| 97 |
No answer |
48 |
4.4% |
0.04351768 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7dvby10_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling about asylum seekers as a group: Anxiety
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anxiety
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
8 |
0.7% |
0.007252947 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
35 |
3.2% |
0.031731641 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
146 |
13.2% |
0.132366274 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
448 |
40.6% |
0.406165005 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
379 |
34.4% |
0.343608341 |
| 97 |
No answer |
87 |
7.9% |
0.078875793 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7dvby10_4
|
Variable label:
|
Feeling about asylum seekers as a group: Fear
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum
seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum
seekers as a group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
20 |
1.8% |
0.01813237 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
32 |
2.9% |
0.02901179 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
157 |
14.2% |
0.14233908 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
433 |
39.3% |
0.39256573 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
379 |
34.4% |
0.34360834 |
| 97 |
No answer |
82 |
7.4% |
0.07434270 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7dvby11_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent have you imagined what it is like arrive in Norway as an
asylum seeker?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent have you thought about or imagined what it is like to
arrive in Norway as an asylum seeker?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 OR u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
188 |
8.2% |
0.08152645 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
539 |
23.4% |
0.23373807 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
1044 |
45.3% |
0.45273200 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
345 |
15.0% |
0.14960971 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
130 |
5.6% |
0.05637467 |
| 97 |
No answer |
60 |
2.6% |
0.02601908 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2383 |
|
NA |
r7padpilot1
|
Variable label:
|
For/against: EU-membership
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now a couple of questions regarding EU membership for Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Firstly: Are you for or against?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I am in favour of EU membership for Norway |
249 |
22.6% |
0.22574796 |
| 2 |
I am against EU membership for Norway |
651 |
59.0% |
0.59020852 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
175 |
15.9% |
0.15865820 |
| 97 |
No answer |
28 |
2.5% |
0.02538531 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7padpilot2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
R7PADPILOT2_ran
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. A vignette is randomly selected from a population of 145
vignettes. The vignette is used in R7PADPILOT2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1082] [Invalid:3607]
[Range:1-144]
|
r7padpilot2
|
Variable label:
|
Should the government act according to result of advisory referendum
even if majority in Storting disagree?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government needs to make
important choices on behalf of the people.
Imagine a new debate regarding EU membership for Norway and that an
advisory referendum was held regarding the issue.
f(‘R7PADPILOT2_ran’)
|
|
Literal question:
|
In such a case the government must act according to the result of the
referendum even if the majority in the Storting disagree?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. Experiment using vignettes. The question wording varies
in accordance with the vignette that is randomly selected in
R7PADPILOT2_ran.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
817 |
74.1% |
0.7407072 |
| 2 |
No |
248 |
22.5% |
0.2248413 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
3.4% |
0.0344515 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7dv29_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Begging should be prohibited
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or
disagree with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
288 |
23.9% |
0.23940150 |
| 2 |
Agree |
256 |
21.3% |
0.21280133 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
209 |
17.4% |
0.17373234 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
147 |
12.2% |
0.12219451 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
99 |
8.2% |
0.08229426 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
128 |
10.6% |
0.10640067 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
51 |
4.2% |
0.04239401 |
| 97 |
No answer |
25 |
2.1% |
0.02078138 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
r7dv29_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in
the world than to people in this country
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or
disagree with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world
than to people in this country.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
125 |
10.4% |
0.10390690 |
| 2 |
Agree |
191 |
15.9% |
0.15876974 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
238 |
19.8% |
0.19783874 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
345 |
28.7% |
0.28678304 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
119 |
9.9% |
0.09891937 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
132 |
11.0% |
0.10972569 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01911887 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02493766 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
r7dv29_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norway will lose its identity if more Muslims
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or
disagree with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims are allowed to
live here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
138 |
11.5% |
0.11471322 |
| 2 |
Agree |
135 |
11.2% |
0.11221945 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
233 |
19.4% |
0.19368246 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
157 |
13.1% |
0.13050707 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
129 |
10.7% |
0.10723192 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
268 |
22.3% |
0.22277639 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
112 |
9.3% |
0.09310058 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
2.6% |
0.02576891 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
r7dv39
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you think/read/talk about something related to 22. July?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
It’s now been more than five years since the attacks on the government
quarter (Regjeringskvartalet) and Utøya of 22 July 2011.
|
|
Literal question:
|
As for you personally, how often would you say that you now think about,
read or talk about something that is related to 22 July?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Daily |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003325021 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
63 |
5.2% |
0.052369077 |
| 3 |
A couple of times a month |
261 |
21.7% |
0.216957606 |
| 4 |
Less often, but it happens |
732 |
60.8% |
0.608478803 |
| 5 |
Never |
113 |
9.4% |
0.093931837 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
2.5% |
0.024937656 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
r7dvby3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of fear of new terrorist attack in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 OR u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
94 |
4.1% |
0.04076323 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
326 |
14.1% |
0.14137034 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
948 |
41.1% |
0.41110147 |
| 4 |
Slightly |
769 |
33.3% |
0.33347788 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
117 |
5.1% |
0.05073721 |
| 97 |
No answer |
52 |
2.3% |
0.02254987 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2383 |
|
NA |
r7dvby4
|
Variable label:
|
Danger of terrorist attack become greater/less last couple of years
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your experience, has the danger of a terrorist attack become greater
or less during the last couple of years, or has there been no change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 OR u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Greater |
1195 |
51.8% |
0.51821336 |
| 2 |
Less |
90 |
3.9% |
0.03902862 |
| 3 |
No change to the danger of terror |
961 |
41.7% |
0.41673894 |
| 97 |
No answer |
60 |
2.6% |
0.02601908 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2383 |
|
NA |
r7pad9_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Can in general rely on the Supreme Court taking the right
decisions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
We can in general rely on the Supreme Court of Norway taking the right
decisions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
187 |
17.0% |
0.1695376247 |
| 2 |
Agree |
609 |
55.2% |
0.5521305530 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
147 |
13.3% |
0.1332728921 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
76 |
6.9% |
0.0689029918 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
38 |
3.4% |
0.0344514959 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
13 |
1.2% |
0.0117860381 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0009066183 |
| 97 |
No answer |
32 |
2.9% |
0.0290117860 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7pad9_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Power of the Supreme Court in controversial cases must be
reduced
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The power of the Supreme Court of Norway to decide some types of
controversial cases must be reduced.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
19 |
1.7% |
0.01722575 |
| 2 |
Agree |
87 |
7.9% |
0.07887579 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
138 |
12.5% |
0.12511333 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
351 |
31.8% |
0.31822303 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
104 |
9.4% |
0.09428830 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
284 |
25.7% |
0.25747960 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
77 |
7.0% |
0.06980961 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
3.9% |
0.03898459 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7pad9_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Supreme Court favours some groups
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The decisions from the Supreme Court of Norway favour some groups more
than others.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
1.3% |
0.01269266 |
| 2 |
Agree |
42 |
3.8% |
0.03807797 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
142 |
12.9% |
0.12873980 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
450 |
40.8% |
0.40797824 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
79 |
7.2% |
0.07162285 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
259 |
23.5% |
0.23481414 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
79 |
7.2% |
0.07162285 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
3.4% |
0.03445150 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7pad9_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Abolish Supreme Court if it makes too many decisions most
people disagree with
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following
statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the Supreme Court of Norway starts to make too many decisions most
people disagree with, it might be an advantage to abolish the court
altogether.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
18 |
1.6% |
0.01631913 |
| 2 |
Agree |
39 |
3.5% |
0.03535811 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
112 |
10.2% |
0.10154125 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
213 |
19.3% |
0.19310970 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
141 |
12.8% |
0.12783318 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
328 |
29.7% |
0.29737081 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
214 |
19.4% |
0.19401632 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
3.4% |
0.03445150 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3586 |
|
NA |
r7ran31
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1080] [Invalid:3609]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
177 |
16.4% |
0.1638889 |
| 2 |
2 |
173 |
16.0% |
0.1601852 |
| 3 |
3 |
184 |
17.0% |
0.1703704 |
| 4 |
4 |
187 |
17.3% |
0.1731481 |
| 5 |
5 |
214 |
19.8% |
0.1981481 |
| 6 |
6 |
145 |
13.4% |
0.1342593 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3609 |
|
NA |
r7pad11a
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Decision, immigrant children of parents that are illegal
residents right to remain if parents deported
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are many immigrant children of parents that are illegal residents
in Norway. Imagine that the Supreme Court decided these children have a
right to remain in Norway if the parents are deported.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran31=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
18 |
10.2% |
0.10169492 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
64 |
36.2% |
0.36158192 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
38 |
21.5% |
0.21468927 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
41 |
23.2% |
0.23163842 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
14 |
7.9% |
0.07909605 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.1% |
0.01129944 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4512 |
|
NA |
r7pad11b
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Decision, immigrant children of parents that are illegal
residents not right to remain if parents deported
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are many immigrant children of parents that are illegal residents
in Norway. Imagine that the Supreme Court decided these children do not
have a right to remain in Norway if the parents are deported.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran31=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
20 |
11.6% |
0.11560694 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
51 |
29.5% |
0.29479769 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
39 |
22.5% |
0.22543353 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
52 |
30.1% |
0.30057803 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
11 |
6.4% |
0.06358382 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4516 |
|
NA |
r7pad11c
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Unanimous, immigrant children of parents that are illegal
residents right to remain if parents deported
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are many immigrant children of parents that are illegal residents
in Norway. Imagine that the Supreme Court unanimously decided that these
children have a right to remain in Norway if the parents are deported.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran31=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
33 |
17.9% |
0.17934783 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
68 |
37.0% |
0.36956522 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
27 |
14.7% |
0.14673913 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
36 |
19.6% |
0.19565217 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
15 |
8.2% |
0.08152174 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.7% |
0.02717391 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4505 |
|
NA |
r7pad11d
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Unanimous, immigrant children of parents that are illegal
residents not right to remain if parents deported
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are many immigrant children of parents that are illegal residents
in Norway. Imagine that the Supreme Court unanimously decided that these
children do not have a right to remain in Norway if the parents are
deported.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran31=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
22 |
11.8% |
0.11764706 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
57 |
30.5% |
0.30481283 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
36 |
19.3% |
0.19251337 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
50 |
26.7% |
0.26737968 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
19 |
10.2% |
0.10160428 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.6% |
0.01604278 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4502 |
|
NA |
r7pad11e
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Bare majority, immigrant children of parents that are
illegal residents right to remain if parents deported
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are many immigrant children of parents that are illegal residents
in Norway. Imagine that the Supreme Court by a bare majority of three
against two judges decided that these children have a right to remain in
Norway if the parents are deported.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran31=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
25 |
11.7% |
0.11682243 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
98 |
45.8% |
0.45794393 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
42 |
19.6% |
0.19626168 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
27 |
12.6% |
0.12616822 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
17 |
7.9% |
0.07943925 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.3% |
0.02336449 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4475 |
|
NA |
r7pad11f
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Bare majority, immigrant children of parents that are
illegal residents not right to remain if parents deported
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are many immigrant children of parents that are illegal residents
in Norway. Imagine that the Supreme Court by a bare majority of three
against two judges decided that these children do not have a right to
remain in Norway if the parents are deported.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran31=6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
17 |
11.7% |
0.11724138 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
49 |
33.8% |
0.33793103 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
34 |
23.4% |
0.23448276 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
36 |
24.8% |
0.24827586 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
5 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.8% |
0.02758621 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4544 |
|
NA |
r7ran32
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1080] [Invalid:3609]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
201 |
18.6% |
0.1861111 |
| 2 |
2 |
164 |
15.2% |
0.1518519 |
| 3 |
3 |
181 |
16.8% |
0.1675926 |
| 4 |
4 |
186 |
17.2% |
0.1722222 |
| 5 |
5 |
171 |
15.8% |
0.1583333 |
| 6 |
6 |
177 |
16.4% |
0.1638889 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3609 |
|
NA |
r7pad12a
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Decision, employers allowed to read texts on phones issued
by the company
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many employers give their employees mobile phones to use for work.
Imagine that the Supreme Court decided that employers should be allowed
to read all the text messages and e-mails contained on the telephones
issued to the employees by the company.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran32=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
10 |
5.0% |
0.04975124 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
42 |
20.9% |
0.20895522 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
33 |
16.4% |
0.16417910 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
58 |
28.9% |
0.28855721 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
53 |
26.4% |
0.26368159 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.5% |
0.02487562 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4488 |
|
NA |
r7pad12b
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Decision, employers not allowed to read texts on phones
issued by the company
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many employers give their employees mobile phones to use for work.
Imagine that the Supreme Court decided that employers are not to be
allowed to read all the text messages and e-mails contained on the
telephones issued to the employees by the company.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran32=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
51 |
31.1% |
0.31097561 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
67 |
40.9% |
0.40853659 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
13 |
7.9% |
0.07926829 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
17 |
10.4% |
0.10365854 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
10 |
6.1% |
0.06097561 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
3.7% |
0.03658537 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4525 |
|
NA |
r7pad12c
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Unanimous, employers allowed to read texts on phones issued
by the company
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many employers give their employees mobile phones to use for work.
Imagine that the Supreme Court unanimously decided that employers should
be allowed to read all the text messages and e-mails contained on the
telephones issued to the employees by the company.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran32=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
6 |
3.3% |
0.03314917 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
40 |
22.1% |
0.22099448 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
23 |
12.7% |
0.12707182 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
58 |
32.0% |
0.32044199 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
47 |
26.0% |
0.25966851 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.9% |
0.03867403 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4508 |
|
NA |
r7pad12d
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Unanimous, employers not allowed to read texts on phones
issued by the company
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many employers give their employees mobile phones to use for work.
Imagine that the Supreme Court unanimously decided that employers should
not be allowed to read all the text messages and e-mails contained on
the telephones issued to the employees by the company.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran32=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
66 |
35.5% |
0.35483871 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
70 |
37.6% |
0.37634409 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
15 |
8.1% |
0.08064516 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
19 |
10.2% |
0.10215054 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
12 |
6.5% |
0.06451613 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.2% |
0.02150538 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4503 |
|
NA |
r7pad12e
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Bare majority, employers allowed to read texts on phones
issued by the company
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many employers give their employees mobile phones to use for work.
Imagine that the Supreme Court by a bare majority of three against two
judges decided that employers should be allowed to read all the text
messages and e-mails contained on the telephones issued to the employees
by the company.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran32=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
7 |
4.1% |
0.04093567 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
40 |
23.4% |
0.23391813 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
33 |
19.3% |
0.19298246 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
42 |
24.6% |
0.24561404 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
45 |
26.3% |
0.26315789 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.3% |
0.02339181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4518 |
|
NA |
r7pad12f
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Bare majority, employers not allowed to read texts on phones
issued by the company
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many employers give their employees mobile phones to use for work.
Imagine that the Supreme Court by a bare majority of three against two
judges decided that employers should not be allowed to read all the text
messages and e-mails contained on the telephones issued to the employees
by the company.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran32=6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
57 |
32.2% |
0.32203390 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
72 |
40.7% |
0.40677966 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
15 |
8.5% |
0.08474576 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
14 |
7.9% |
0.07909605 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
12 |
6.8% |
0.06779661 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
4.0% |
0.03954802 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4512 |
|
NA |
r7ran33
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1080] [Invalid:3609]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
189 |
17.5% |
0.1750000 |
| 2 |
2 |
177 |
16.4% |
0.1638889 |
| 3 |
3 |
156 |
14.4% |
0.1444444 |
| 4 |
4 |
163 |
15.1% |
0.1509259 |
| 5 |
5 |
194 |
18.0% |
0.1796296 |
| 6 |
6 |
201 |
18.6% |
0.1861111 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3609 |
|
NA |
r7pad13a
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Decision, neighbour disputes allowed to go to court before
mediation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many thousands of neighbour disputes arise in Norway every year. Imagine
that the Supreme Court decided that the people involved in neighbour
disputes (for example the height of trees and fences) are to be allowed
to go directly to the courts without first having tried to resolve the
conflict by mediation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran33=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
4 |
2.1% |
0.02116402 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
16 |
8.5% |
0.08465608 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
19 |
10.1% |
0.10052910 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
80 |
42.3% |
0.42328042 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
64 |
33.9% |
0.33862434 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
3.2% |
0.03174603 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4500 |
|
NA |
r7pad13b
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Decision, neighbour disputes not allowed to go to court
before mediation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many thousands of neighbour disputes arise in Norway every year. Imagine
that the Supreme Court decided that the people involved in neighbour
disputes (for example the height of trees and fences) are not to be
allowed to go directly to the courts without first having tried to
resolve the conflict by mediation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran33=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
69 |
39.0% |
0.38983051 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
71 |
40.1% |
0.40112994 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
13 |
7.3% |
0.07344633 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
12 |
6.8% |
0.06779661 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
7 |
4.0% |
0.03954802 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.8% |
0.02824859 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4512 |
|
NA |
r7pad13c
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Unanimous, neighbour disputes allowed to go to court before
mediation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many thousands of neighbour disputes arise in Norway every year. Imagine
that the Supreme Court unanimously decided that the people involved in
neighbour disputes (for example the height of trees and fences) are to
be allowed to go directly to the courts without first having tried to
resolve the conflict by mediation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran33=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
2 |
1.3% |
0.01282051 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
16 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
24 |
15.4% |
0.15384615 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
65 |
41.7% |
0.41666667 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
44 |
28.2% |
0.28205128 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
3.2% |
0.03205128 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4533 |
|
NA |
r7pad13d
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Unanimous, neighbour disputes not allowed to go to court
before mediation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many thousands of neighbour disputes arise in Norway every year. Imagine
that the Supreme Court unanimously decided that the people involved in
neighbour disputes (for example the height of trees and fences) are not
to be allowed to go directly to the courts without first having tried to
resolve the conflict by mediation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran33=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
76 |
46.6% |
0.46625767 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
57 |
35.0% |
0.34969325 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
14 |
8.6% |
0.08588957 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
6 |
3.7% |
0.03680982 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
5 |
3.1% |
0.03067485 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
3.1% |
0.03067485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4526 |
|
NA |
r7pad13e
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Bare majority, neighbour disputes allowed to go to court
before mediation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many thousands of neighbour disputes arise in Norway every year. Imagine
that the Supreme Court by a bare majority of three against two judges
decided that the people involved in neighbour disputes (for example the
height of trees and fences) are to be allowed to go directly to the
courts without first having tried to resolve the conflict by mediation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran33=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01546392 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
23 |
11.9% |
0.11855670 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
28 |
14.4% |
0.14432990 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
82 |
42.3% |
0.42268041 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
51 |
26.3% |
0.26288660 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.6% |
0.03608247 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4495 |
|
NA |
r7pad13f
|
Variable label:
|
Acceptable: Bare majority, neighbour disputes not allowed to go to court
before mediation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many thousands of neighbour disputes arise in Norway every year. Imagine
that the Supreme Court by a bare majority of three against two judges
decided that the people involved in neighbour disputes (for example the
height of trees and fences) are not to be allowed to go directly to the
courts without first having tried to resolve the conflict by mediation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think this would be an acceptable
decision by the Supreme Court?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran33=6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
82 |
40.8% |
0.40796020 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
76 |
37.8% |
0.37810945 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
26 |
12.9% |
0.12935323 |
| 4 |
Not very acceptable |
7 |
3.5% |
0.03482587 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01492537 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.5% |
0.03482587 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4488 |
|
NA |
r7ran17
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1184] [Invalid:3505]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
235 |
19.8% |
0.1984797 |
| 2 |
2 |
221 |
18.7% |
0.1866554 |
| 3 |
3 |
245 |
20.7% |
0.2069257 |
| 4 |
4 |
225 |
19.0% |
0.1900338 |
| 5 |
5 |
258 |
21.8% |
0.2179054 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3505 |
|
NA |
r7pad1a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Authorities given leave to detain persons they believe
might be potential terrorists, suggested in Britain
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In Britain it has been suggested that the authorities should be given
leave to detain (keep in detention without a formal charge and without
trial) persons they believe might be potential terrorists.
Imagine that the authorities in Norway ask permission to detain persons
they believe might be involved in terrorist activity. Some are of the
opinion that the authorities should be given leave because this might
reduce the risk of terrorism, others are of the opinion that the
authorities should not be given leave because this is a breach of the
basic rule that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree to the authorities being given
leave to detain persons they believe might be potential terrorists?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran17=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
35 |
14.9% |
0.14893617 |
| 2 |
Agree |
46 |
19.6% |
0.19574468 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
67 |
28.5% |
0.28510638 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
20 |
8.5% |
0.08510638 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
22 |
9.4% |
0.09361702 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
27 |
11.5% |
0.11489362 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
6.4% |
0.06382979 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01276596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4454 |
|
NA |
r7pad1b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Authorities given leave to detain persons they believe
might be potential terrorists, suggested in Denmark
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In Denmark it has been suggested that the authorities should be given
leave to detain (keep in detention without a formal charge and without
trial) persons they believe might be potential terrorists.
Imagine that the authorities in Norway ask permission to detain persons
they believe might be involved in terrorist activity. Some are of the
opinion that the authorities should be given leave because this might
reduce the risk of terrorism, others are of the opinion that the
authorities should not be given leave because this is a breach of the
basic rule that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree to the authorities being given
leave to detain persons they believe might be potential terrorists?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran17=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
37 |
16.7% |
0.16742081 |
| 2 |
Agree |
42 |
19.0% |
0.19004525 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
57 |
25.8% |
0.25791855 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
19 |
8.6% |
0.08597285 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
20 |
9.0% |
0.09049774 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
35 |
15.8% |
0.15837104 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
3.6% |
0.03619910 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01357466 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4468 |
|
NA |
r7pad1c
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Authorities given leave to detain persons they believe
might be potential terrorists, suggested in Germany
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In Germany it has been suggested that the authorities should be given
leave to detain (keep in detention without a formal charge and without
trial) persons they believe might be potential terrorists.
Imagine that the authorities in Norway ask permission to detain persons
they believe might be involved in terrorist activity. Some are of the
opinion that the authorities should be given leave because this might
reduce the risk of terrorism, others are of the opinion that the
authorities should not be given leave because this is a breach of the
basic rule that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree to the authorities being given
leave to detain persons they believe might be potential terrorists?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran17=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
32 |
13.1% |
0.13061224 |
| 2 |
Agree |
47 |
19.2% |
0.19183673 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
66 |
26.9% |
0.26938776 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
29 |
11.8% |
0.11836735 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
27 |
11.0% |
0.11020408 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
25 |
10.2% |
0.10204082 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
6.1% |
0.06122449 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.6% |
0.01632653 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4444 |
|
NA |
r7pad1d
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Authorities given leave to detain persons they believe
might be potential terrorists, suggested in the USA
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the USA it has been suggested that the authorities should be given
leave to detain (keep in detention without a formal charge and without
trial) persons they believe might be potential terrorists.
Imagine that the authorities in Norway ask permission to detain persons
they believe might be involved in terrorist activity. Some are of the
opinion that the authorities should be given leave because this might
reduce the risk of terrorism, others are of the opinion that the
authorities should not be given leave because this is a breach of the
basic rule that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree to the authorities being given
leave to detain persons they believe might be potential terrorists?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran17=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
33 |
14.7% |
0.14666667 |
| 2 |
Agree |
34 |
15.1% |
0.15111111 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
59 |
26.2% |
0.26222222 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
25 |
11.1% |
0.11111111 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
23 |
10.2% |
0.10222222 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
32 |
14.2% |
0.14222222 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
7.1% |
0.07111111 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01333333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4464 |
|
NA |
r7pad1e
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Authorities given leave to detain persons they believe
might be potential terrorists
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities in Norway ask permission to detain (keep in
detention without a formal charge and without trial) persons they
believe might be involved in terrorist activity. Some are of the opinion
that the authorities should be given leave because this might reduce the
risk of terrorism, others are of the opinion that the authorities should
not be given leave because this is a breach of the basic rule that
everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree to the authorities being given
leave to detain persons they believe might be potential terrorists?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran17=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
43 |
16.7% |
0.16666667 |
| 2 |
Agree |
53 |
20.5% |
0.20542636 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
68 |
26.4% |
0.26356589 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
29 |
11.2% |
0.11240310 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
18 |
7.0% |
0.06976744 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
31 |
12.0% |
0.12015504 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
6.2% |
0.06201550 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4431 |
|
NA |
r7pad2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Done the last year to change society: Boycotted goods
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you performed any of the following in an
attempt to change conditions in society. More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Boycotted goods.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Boycotted goods. |
269 |
22.4% |
0.22360765 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01911887 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
911 |
75.7% |
0.75727348 |
r7pad2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Done the last year to change society: Purchased goods based on
ethical/moral reasons
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you performed any of the following in an
attempt to change conditions in society. More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Purchased specific goods based on ethical, environmental or moral
reasons.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Purchased specific goods based on ethical, environmental or moral reasons. |
380 |
31.6% |
0.31587697 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01911887 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
800 |
66.5% |
0.66500416 |
r7pad2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Done the last year to change society: Purchased Fairtrade products
despite cheaper alternatives
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you performed any of the following in an
attempt to change conditions in society. More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Purchased Fairtrade products even though other cheaper alternatives were
available.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Purchased Fairtrade products even though other cheaper alternatives were
available. |
365 |
30.3% |
0.30340815 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01911887 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
815 |
67.7% |
0.67747298 |
r7pad2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Done the last year to change society: Purchased organic products despite
cheaper alternatives
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you performed any of the following in an
attempt to change conditions in society. More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Chosen organic products even though other cheaper alternatives were
available.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Chosen organic products even though other cheaper alternatives were available. |
452 |
37.6% |
0.37572735 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01911887 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
728 |
60.5% |
0.60515378 |
r7pad2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Done the last year to change society: Reduced/cut the amount of meat in
diet
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you performed any of the following in an
attempt to change conditions in society. More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reduced or cut the amount of meat in your diet.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Reduced or cut the amount of meat in your diet. |
339 |
28.2% |
0.28179551 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01911887 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
841 |
69.9% |
0.69908562 |
r7pad2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Done the last year to change society: Purchased fewer good than normally
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you performed any of the following in an
attempt to change conditions in society. More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Purchased fewer goods than you would as a norm.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Purchased fewer goods than you would as a norm. |
349 |
29.0% |
0.29010806 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01911887 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
831 |
69.1% |
0.69077307 |
r7pad2_7
|
Variable label:
|
Done the last year to change society: Purchased reusable products
instead of new ones
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you performed any of the following in an
attempt to change conditions in society. More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Purchased reusable products instead of new ones.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Purchased reusable products instead of new ones. |
348 |
28.9% |
0.28927681 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01911887 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
832 |
69.2% |
0.69160432 |
r7pad2_8
|
Variable label:
|
Done the last year to change society: Participated in protest against
brand/shop
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you performed any of the following in an
attempt to change conditions in society. More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in any protest actions against specific brands or shops.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Participated in any protest actions against specific brands or shops. |
20 |
1.7% |
0.01662510 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01911887 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1160 |
96.4% |
0.96425603 |
r7pad2_9
|
Variable label:
|
Done the last year to change society: Invested in company with a social
profile you support
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you performed any of the following in an
attempt to change conditions in society. More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Made investments in companies that have a social profile that you
support.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Made investments in companies that have a social profile that you support. |
51 |
4.2% |
0.04239401 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01911887 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1129 |
93.8% |
0.93848712 |
r7pad3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politicians unable to do anything about problems in society,
everyone must do their bit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
As politicians are unable to do anything about the problems in society,
everyone must do their bit.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
33 |
2.7% |
0.02743142 |
| 2 |
Agree |
193 |
16.0% |
0.16043225 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
363 |
30.2% |
0.30174564 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
242 |
20.1% |
0.20116376 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
111 |
9.2% |
0.09226933 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
179 |
14.9% |
0.14879468 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
39 |
3.2% |
0.03241895 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
3.6% |
0.03574397 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
r7pad3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politicians’ responsibility to ensure that our society is
sustainable
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is the politicians’ responsibility, not individuals’, to ensure that
our society is sustainable.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
2.6% |
0.02576891 |
| 2 |
Agree |
124 |
10.3% |
0.10307564 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
244 |
20.3% |
0.20282627 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
154 |
12.8% |
0.12801330 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
290 |
24.1% |
0.24106401 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
260 |
21.6% |
0.21612635 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
58 |
4.8% |
0.04821280 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
3.5% |
0.03491272 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
r7pad3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Conscious decisions in our daily life can alter social
development
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
By making conscious decisions in our daily life, it is possible to alter
social development.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
120 |
10.0% |
0.099750623 |
| 2 |
Agree |
521 |
43.3% |
0.433083957 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
366 |
30.4% |
0.304239401 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
93 |
7.7% |
0.077306733 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
39 |
3.2% |
0.032418953 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
14 |
1.2% |
0.011637573 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007481297 |
| 97 |
No answer |
41 |
3.4% |
0.034081463 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
r7pad3_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Naive to believe major global challenges for society can be
solved by single individuals’ life choices
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is naive to believe that major global challenges for society can be
solved by single individuals’ life choices.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
52 |
4.3% |
0.04322527 |
| 2 |
Agree |
175 |
14.5% |
0.14546966 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
258 |
21.4% |
0.21446384 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
153 |
12.7% |
0.12718204 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
272 |
22.6% |
0.22610141 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
194 |
16.1% |
0.16126351 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
50 |
4.2% |
0.04156276 |
| 97 |
No answer |
49 |
4.1% |
0.04073150 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
r7ran8
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1176] [Invalid:3513]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
232 |
19.7% |
0.1972789 |
| 2 |
2 |
241 |
20.5% |
0.2049320 |
| 3 |
3 |
239 |
20.3% |
0.2032313 |
| 4 |
4 |
240 |
20.4% |
0.2040816 |
| 5 |
5 |
224 |
19.0% |
0.1904762 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3513 |
|
NA |
r7dvex2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Should party be banned: Abolish all production of oil
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a political party desires to change Norway in a radical way
by abolishing all the production of oil along the Norwegian coast.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, should such a party be banned?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran8=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
51 |
22.0% |
0.21982759 |
| 2 |
No |
176 |
75.9% |
0.75862069 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.2% |
0.02155172 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4457 |
|
NA |
r7dvex2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Should party be banned: Abolish free and fair elections
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a political party desires to change Norway in a radical way
by abolishing free and fair elections.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, should such a party be banned?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran8=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
175 |
72.6% |
0.72614108 |
| 2 |
No |
61 |
25.3% |
0.25311203 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.1% |
0.02074689 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4448 |
|
NA |
r7dvex2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Should party be banned: Abolish freedom of the press
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a political party desires to change Norway in a radical way
by abolishing the freedom of the press.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, should such a party be banned?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran8=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
160 |
66.9% |
0.6694561 |
| 2 |
No |
75 |
31.4% |
0.3138075 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.7% |
0.0167364 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4450 |
|
NA |
r7dvex2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Should party be banned: Abolish endorsement of the Convention on Human
Rights
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a political party desires to change Norway in a radical way
by abolishing Norway’s endorsement of the Convention on Human Rights.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, should such a party be banned?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran8=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
122 |
50.8% |
0.50833333 |
| 2 |
No |
110 |
45.8% |
0.45833333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
3.3% |
0.03333333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4449 |
|
NA |
r7dvex2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Should party be banned: Abolish the rights of minorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a political party desires to change Norway in a radical way
by abolishing the rights of minorities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, should such a party be banned?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran8=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
120 |
53.6% |
0.53571429 |
| 2 |
No |
101 |
45.1% |
0.45089286 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01339286 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4465 |
|
NA |
r7ran9
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1176] [Invalid:3513]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
282 |
24.0% |
0.2397959 |
| 2 |
2 |
302 |
25.7% |
0.2568027 |
| 3 |
3 |
313 |
26.6% |
0.2661565 |
| 4 |
4 |
279 |
23.7% |
0.2372449 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3513 |
|
NA |
r7dvg_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Believable that those who state sexual orientation as reason
they are seeking asylum are telling the truth
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
There is reason to believe that most of those who state sexual
orientation as the reason they have left their home country and are
seeking asylum in Norway are telling the truth.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran9=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
7 |
2.5% |
0.02482270 |
| 2 |
Agree |
39 |
13.8% |
0.13829787 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
52 |
18.4% |
0.18439716 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
104 |
36.9% |
0.36879433 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
33 |
11.7% |
0.11702128 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
31 |
11.0% |
0.10992908 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
13 |
4.6% |
0.04609929 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4407 |
|
NA |
r7dvg_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Believable that the reason to seek asylum is true
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
There is reason to believe that most of those who state the reason they
have left their home country and are seeking asylum in Norway are
telling the truth.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran9=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
8 |
2.6% |
0.026490066 |
| 2 |
Agree |
68 |
22.5% |
0.225165563 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
74 |
24.5% |
0.245033113 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
48 |
15.9% |
0.158940397 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
59 |
19.5% |
0.195364238 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
29 |
9.6% |
0.096026490 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
13 |
4.3% |
0.043046358 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.0% |
0.009933775 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4387 |
|
NA |
r7dvg_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Believable that those who state conversion to new religion as
reason they are seeking asylum are telling the truth
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
There is reason to believe that most of those who state conversion to a
new religion as the reason they have left their home country and are
seeking asylum in Norway are telling the truth.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran9=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3 |
1.0% |
0.009584665 |
| 2 |
Agree |
27 |
8.6% |
0.086261981 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
52 |
16.6% |
0.166134185 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
106 |
33.9% |
0.338658147 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
50 |
16.0% |
0.159744409 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
56 |
17.9% |
0.178913738 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
5.1% |
0.051118211 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.0% |
0.009584665 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4376 |
|
NA |
r7dvg_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Believable that the asylum seekers who state that they are
minors are telling the truth
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
There is reason to believe that most of those who state that they are
minors when seeking asylum in Norway are telling the truth.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran9=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
4 |
1.4% |
0.014336918 |
| 2 |
Agree |
36 |
12.9% |
0.129032258 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
44 |
15.8% |
0.157706093 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
69 |
24.7% |
0.247311828 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
65 |
23.3% |
0.232974910 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
36 |
12.9% |
0.129032258 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
23 |
8.2% |
0.082437276 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.007168459 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4410 |
|
NA |
r7ran10
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1175] [Invalid:3514]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
182 |
15.5% |
0.1548936 |
| 2 |
2 |
164 |
14.0% |
0.1395745 |
| 3 |
3 |
170 |
14.5% |
0.1446809 |
| 4 |
4 |
160 |
13.6% |
0.1361702 |
| 5 |
5 |
184 |
15.7% |
0.1565957 |
| 6 |
6 |
166 |
14.1% |
0.1412766 |
| 7 |
7 |
149 |
12.7% |
0.1268085 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3514 |
|
NA |
r7dvkost1
|
Variable label:
|
How large cost/benefit is immigration to the welfare state?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How large would you say the cost or benefit of immigration is to the
Norwegian welfare state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran10=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very large cost |
15 |
8.2% |
0.08241758 |
| 2 |
Large cost |
42 |
23.1% |
0.23076923 |
| 3 |
A certain cost |
54 |
29.7% |
0.29670330 |
| 4 |
Neither cost nor benefit |
13 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
| 5 |
A certain benefit |
42 |
23.1% |
0.23076923 |
| 6 |
Great benefit |
14 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
| 7 |
Very great benefit |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.1% |
0.01098901 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4507 |
|
NA |
r7dvkost2
|
Variable label:
|
How large cost/benefit is immigration to the welfare state? Unemployment
rate 7%
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You may well be aware that the unemployment rate for immigrants in
Norway is around 7%.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taking this into account, how large would you say the cost or benefit of
immigration is to the Norwegian welfare state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran10=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very large cost |
22 |
13.4% |
0.134146341 |
| 2 |
Large cost |
30 |
18.3% |
0.182926829 |
| 3 |
A certain cost |
48 |
29.3% |
0.292682927 |
| 4 |
Neither cost nor benefit |
21 |
12.8% |
0.128048780 |
| 5 |
A certain benefit |
32 |
19.5% |
0.195121951 |
| 6 |
Great benefit |
8 |
4.9% |
0.048780488 |
| 7 |
Very great benefit |
1 |
0.6% |
0.006097561 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.2% |
0.012195122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4525 |
|
NA |
r7dvkost3
|
Variable label:
|
How large cost/benefit is immigration to the welfare state? Employment
rate 60%
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You may well be aware that the employment rate for immigrants in Norway
is around 60%.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taking this into account, how large would you say the cost or benefit of
immigration is to the Norwegian welfare state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran10=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very large cost |
15 |
8.8% |
0.08823529 |
| 2 |
Large cost |
45 |
26.5% |
0.26470588 |
| 3 |
A certain cost |
58 |
34.1% |
0.34117647 |
| 4 |
Neither cost nor benefit |
8 |
4.7% |
0.04705882 |
| 5 |
A certain benefit |
30 |
17.6% |
0.17647059 |
| 6 |
Great benefit |
6 |
3.5% |
0.03529412 |
| 7 |
Very great benefit |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
4.7% |
0.04705882 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4519 |
|
NA |
r7dvkost4
|
Variable label:
|
How large cost/benefit is immigration to the welfare state? Expense
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You may well be aware that the unemployment rate for immigrants means a
significant expense for the Norwegian welfare state.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taking this into account, how large would you say the cost or benefit of
immigration is to the Norwegian welfare state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran10=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very large cost |
18 |
11.2% |
0.11250 |
| 2 |
Large cost |
50 |
31.2% |
0.31250 |
| 3 |
A certain cost |
55 |
34.4% |
0.34375 |
| 4 |
Neither cost nor benefit |
8 |
5.0% |
0.05000 |
| 5 |
A certain benefit |
19 |
11.9% |
0.11875 |
| 6 |
Great benefit |
5 |
3.1% |
0.03125 |
| 7 |
Very great benefit |
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.5% |
0.02500 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4529 |
|
NA |
r7dvkost5
|
Variable label:
|
How large cost/benefit is immigration to the welfare state? Income
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You may well be aware that the employment rate of immigrants means a
significant income for the Norwegian welfare state.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taking this into account, how large would you say the cost or benefit of
immigration is to the Norwegian welfare state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran10=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very large cost |
15 |
8.2% |
0.08152174 |
| 2 |
Large cost |
25 |
13.6% |
0.13586957 |
| 3 |
A certain cost |
46 |
25.0% |
0.25000000 |
| 4 |
Neither cost nor benefit |
33 |
17.9% |
0.17934783 |
| 5 |
A certain benefit |
43 |
23.4% |
0.23369565 |
| 6 |
Great benefit |
11 |
6.0% |
0.05978261 |
| 7 |
Very great benefit |
2 |
1.1% |
0.01086957 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
4.9% |
0.04891304 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4505 |
|
NA |
r7dvkost6
|
Variable label:
|
How large cost/benefit is immigration to the welfare state? Unemployment
rate 7%, expense
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You may well be aware that the unemployment rate for immigrants in
Norway is around 7%. This means a significant expense for the Norwegian
welfare state.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taking this into account, how large would you say the cost or benefit of
immigration is to the Norwegian welfare state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran10=6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very large cost |
14 |
8.4% |
0.084337349 |
| 2 |
Large cost |
38 |
22.9% |
0.228915663 |
| 3 |
A certain cost |
56 |
33.7% |
0.337349398 |
| 4 |
Neither cost nor benefit |
20 |
12.0% |
0.120481928 |
| 5 |
A certain benefit |
28 |
16.9% |
0.168674699 |
| 6 |
Great benefit |
6 |
3.6% |
0.036144578 |
| 7 |
Very great benefit |
1 |
0.6% |
0.006024096 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.8% |
0.018072289 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4523 |
|
NA |
r7dvkost7
|
Variable label:
|
How large cost/benefit is immigration to the welfare state? Employment
rate 60%, income
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You may well be aware that the employment rate for immigrants in Norway
is around 60%. This means a significant income for the Norwegian welfare
state.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Taking this into account, how large would you say the cost or benefit of
immigration is to the Norwegian welfare state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran10=7. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very large cost |
13 |
8.7% |
0.08724832 |
| 2 |
Large cost |
27 |
18.1% |
0.18120805 |
| 3 |
A certain cost |
53 |
35.6% |
0.35570470 |
| 4 |
Neither cost nor benefit |
8 |
5.4% |
0.05369128 |
| 5 |
A certain benefit |
30 |
20.1% |
0.20134228 |
| 6 |
Great benefit |
13 |
8.7% |
0.08724832 |
| 7 |
Very great benefit |
2 |
1.3% |
0.01342282 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.0% |
0.02013423 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4540 |
|
NA |
r7dvinn
|
Variable label:
|
How mild/strict should Norway’s immigration politics be?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How mild or strict should Norway’s immigration politics be?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very mild |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004156276 |
| 2 |
Mild |
55 |
4.6% |
0.045719036 |
| 3 |
Somewhat mild |
110 |
9.1% |
0.091438071 |
| 4 |
Neither mild nor strict |
194 |
16.1% |
0.161263508 |
| 5 |
Somewhat strict |
388 |
32.3% |
0.322527016 |
| 6 |
Strict |
293 |
24.4% |
0.243557772 |
| 7 |
Very strict |
116 |
9.6% |
0.096425603 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
3.5% |
0.034912718 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3486 |
|
NA |
r7nfc_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Prefers complicated rather than easy tasks
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I prefer complicated rather than easy tasks
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked to respondents that have not answered on R5NFC in wave 5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
54 |
6.6% |
0.065533981 |
| 2 |
Agree |
181 |
22.0% |
0.219660194 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
224 |
27.2% |
0.271844660 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
163 |
19.8% |
0.197815534 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
70 |
8.5% |
0.084951456 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
37 |
4.5% |
0.044902913 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008495146 |
| 97 |
No answer |
88 |
10.7% |
0.106796117 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3865 |
|
NA |
r7nfc_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Likes tasks where you come up with new solutions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I really like tasks where the idea is to come up with new solutions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked to respondents that have not answered on R5NFC in wave 5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
110 |
13.3% |
0.133495146 |
| 2 |
Agree |
289 |
35.1% |
0.350728155 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
198 |
24.0% |
0.240291262 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
100 |
12.1% |
0.121359223 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
32 |
3.9% |
0.038834951 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
9 |
1.1% |
0.010922330 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003640777 |
| 97 |
No answer |
83 |
10.1% |
0.100728155 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3865 |
|
NA |
r7nfc_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Would prefer a task that is intellectual rather than one
needing little thought
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I would prefer a task that is intellectual and complex rather than one
that needs little thought.
|
|
Technical description:
|
Only asked to respondents that have not answered on R5NFC in wave 5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
83 |
10.1% |
0.100728155 |
| 2 |
Agree |
235 |
28.5% |
0.285194175 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
173 |
21.0% |
0.209951456 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
147 |
17.8% |
0.178398058 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
56 |
6.8% |
0.067961165 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
34 |
4.1% |
0.041262136 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
0.6% |
0.006067961 |
| 97 |
No answer |
91 |
11.0% |
0.110436893 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3865 |
|
NA |
r7nte_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Opinion about most things
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I have an opinion about most things
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked to respondents that have not answered on R5NTE in wave 5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
53 |
6.6% |
0.065920398 |
| 2 |
Agree |
190 |
23.6% |
0.236318408 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
270 |
33.6% |
0.335820896 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
93 |
11.6% |
0.115671642 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
83 |
10.3% |
0.103233831 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
36 |
4.5% |
0.044776119 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003731343 |
| 97 |
No answer |
76 |
9.5% |
0.094527363 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3885 |
|
NA |
r7nte_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Important to have a view on whether something is right/wrong
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I think it is important to have a view on whether something is right or
wrong
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked to respondents that have not answered on R5NTE in wave 5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
108 |
13.4% |
0.134328358 |
| 2 |
Agree |
312 |
38.8% |
0.388059701 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
179 |
22.3% |
0.222636816 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
77 |
9.6% |
0.095771144 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
36 |
4.5% |
0.044776119 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
15 |
1.9% |
0.018656716 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
0.9% |
0.008706468 |
| 97 |
No answer |
70 |
8.7% |
0.087064677 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3885 |
|
NA |
r7k13
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you discuss politics with others?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often would you say that you discuss politics with others?
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Often |
213 |
23.2% |
0.23227917 |
| 2 |
Sometimes |
413 |
45.0% |
0.45038168 |
| 3 |
Rarely |
196 |
21.4% |
0.21374046 |
| 4 |
Never |
24 |
2.6% |
0.02617230 |
| 97 |
No answer |
71 |
7.7% |
0.07742639 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3772 |
|
NA |
r7k33
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best applies to what you have been doing the last
week?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark one alternative.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent did not previously respond to r6k33]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Paid work (or temporarily absent) |
541 |
56.0% |
0.560041408 |
| 2 |
Studying (not paid for by an employer) |
70 |
7.2% |
0.072463768 |
| 3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
26 |
2.7% |
0.026915114 |
| 4 |
Unemployed. Want a job, but not actively seeking work |
10 |
1.0% |
0.010351967 |
| 5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
32 |
3.3% |
0.033126294 |
| 6 |
Retired |
141 |
14.6% |
0.145962733 |
| 7 |
Civilian or military service |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001035197 |
| 8 |
At home, looking after children or others |
20 |
2.1% |
0.020703934 |
| 9 |
Other |
42 |
4.3% |
0.043478261 |
| 97 |
No answer |
83 |
8.6% |
0.085921325 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3723 |
|
NA |
r7k33_9_other
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best applies to what you have been doing the last
week? Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark one alternative.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent did not previously respond to r6k33]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7k34_1
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Public central administration
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Public central administration/authority |
275 |
7.4% |
0.07386516 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3406 |
91.5% |
0.91485361 |
r7k34_2
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Kindergarten/school/teaching
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Kindergarten/school/teaching |
432 |
11.6% |
0.11603546 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3249 |
87.3% |
0.87268332 |
r7k34_3
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Health services
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health services |
422 |
11.3% |
0.11334945 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3259 |
87.5% |
0.87536933 |
r7k34_4
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Social services/child protection
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social services/child protection |
81 |
2.2% |
0.02175665 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3600 |
96.7% |
0.96696213 |
r7k34_5
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Nursing and care services
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nursing and care services |
154 |
4.1% |
0.04136449 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3527 |
94.7% |
0.94735428 |
r7k34_6
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Defence/police/judicial system/security
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Defence/police/judicial system/security |
95 |
2.6% |
0.02551706 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3586 |
96.3% |
0.96320172 |
r7k34_7
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Agriculture/forestry/fishing
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agriculture/forestry/fishing |
121 |
3.3% |
0.03250067 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3560 |
95.6% |
0.95621810 |
r7k34_8
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Industry/technology
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Industry/technology |
230 |
6.2% |
0.06177814 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3451 |
92.7% |
0.92694064 |
r7k34_9
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Building/construction
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Building/construction |
259 |
7.0% |
0.06956755 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3422 |
91.9% |
0.91915122 |
r7k34_10
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Retailing/shop
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Retailing/shop |
169 |
4.5% |
0.04539350 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3512 |
94.3% |
0.94332528 |
r7k34_11
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Transport/communications
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Transport/communications |
166 |
4.5% |
0.04458770 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3515 |
94.4% |
0.94413108 |
r7k34_12
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Culture/sport/organisations
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Cultur/sport/organisations |
129 |
3.5% |
0.03464948 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3552 |
95.4% |
0.95406930 |
r7k34_13
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Media/advertising
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Media/advertising/PR/information |
83 |
2.2% |
0.02229385 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3598 |
96.6% |
0.96642493 |
r7k34_14
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Research/analysis
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Research/analysis |
145 |
3.9% |
0.03894709 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3536 |
95.0% |
0.94977169 |
r7k34_15
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Travel/hotels
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Travels/hotels |
47 |
1.3% |
0.01262423 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3634 |
97.6% |
0.97609455 |
r7k34_16
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Restaurants/catering
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Restaurants/catering |
36 |
1.0% |
0.009669621 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.011281225 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3645 |
97.9% |
0.979049154 |
r7k34_17
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Telecommunications/IT
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Telecommunications/IT |
154 |
4.1% |
0.04136449 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3527 |
94.7% |
0.94735428 |
r7k34_18
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Banking/insurance/finance
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Banking/insurance/finance |
119 |
3.2% |
0.03196347 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3562 |
95.7% |
0.95675530 |
r7k34_19
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Commercial services
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Commercial services |
176 |
4.7% |
0.04727370 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3505 |
94.1% |
0.94144507 |
r7k34_20
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Oil/gas
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oil/gas |
164 |
4.4% |
0.04405050 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3517 |
94.5% |
0.94466828 |
r7k34_21
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Other
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other |
891 |
23.9% |
0.23932313 |
| 97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01128122 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
966 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2790 |
74.9% |
0.74939565 |
r7k34_21_other
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Other [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if respondent answered r6k33. The intended question sample was
respondents answering r7k33 = 1, but was given to the wrong sample by an
error]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7k35
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked to respondents that have not answered on R6K35 in wave 5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A city |
225 |
23.2% |
0.23171988 |
| 2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
185 |
19.1% |
0.19052523 |
| 3 |
A small or medium sized town |
240 |
24.7% |
0.24716787 |
| 4 |
A village |
137 |
14.1% |
0.14109166 |
| 5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
103 |
10.6% |
0.10607621 |
| 97 |
No answer |
81 |
8.3% |
0.08341916 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3718 |
|
NA |
r7ran24
|
Variable label:
|
[All respondents are randomized. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents are randomized. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4581] [Invalid:108]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
789 |
17.2% |
0.1722331 |
| 2 |
2 |
778 |
17.0% |
0.1698319 |
| 3 |
3 |
748 |
16.3% |
0.1632831 |
| 4 |
4 |
762 |
16.6% |
0.1663392 |
| 5 |
5 |
743 |
16.2% |
0.1621917 |
| 6 |
6 |
761 |
16.6% |
0.1661209 |
| Sysmiss |
|
108 |
|
NA |
r7ran24_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran24=1. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if ran24=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:789] [Invalid:3900]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
250 |
31.7% |
0.3168568 |
| 2 |
2 |
259 |
32.8% |
0.3282636 |
| 3 |
3 |
280 |
35.5% |
0.3548796 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3900 |
|
NA |
ocr7matc1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of these three statements: Increase assistance to
the poor, decrease tax on fuel, allow large corporations to pollute
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree with?
We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran24=1 AND ran24_1=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
41 |
16.4% |
0.164 |
| 2 |
1 |
167 |
66.8% |
0.668 |
| 3 |
2 |
37 |
14.8% |
0.148 |
| 4 |
3 |
3 |
1.2% |
0.012 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.8% |
0.008 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4439 |
|
NA |
ocr7matc1a
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norway allow people from Muslim countries to come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think Norway should allow people from Muslim countries to come
and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran24=1 AND ran24_1=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Allow to come and live here |
159 |
63.6% |
0.636 |
| 2 |
Do not allow to come and live here |
80 |
32.0% |
0.320 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
4.4% |
0.044 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4439 |
|
NA |
ocr7matc2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of these three statements: Increase assistance to
the poor, decrease tax on fuel, allow large corporations to pollute
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree with?
We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran24=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
174 |
22.4% |
0.22365039 |
| 2 |
1 |
462 |
59.4% |
0.59383033 |
| 3 |
2 |
121 |
15.6% |
0.15552699 |
| 4 |
3 |
11 |
1.4% |
0.01413882 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.3% |
0.01285347 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3911 |
|
NA |
ocr7matc2a
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norway allow people from Eastern European countries to come and
live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think Norway should allow people from Eastern European countries
to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran24=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Allow to come and live here |
428 |
55.0% |
0.5501285 |
| 2 |
Do not allow to come and live here |
316 |
40.6% |
0.4061697 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
4.4% |
0.0437018 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3911 |
|
NA |
ocr7matc3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of these three statements: Increase assistance to
the poor, decrease tax on fuel, allow large corporations to pollute
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree with?
We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran24=1 AND ran24_1=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
48 |
18.5% |
0.18532819 |
| 2 |
1 |
164 |
63.3% |
0.63320463 |
| 3 |
2 |
40 |
15.4% |
0.15444015 |
| 4 |
3 |
4 |
1.5% |
0.01544402 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.2% |
0.01158301 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4430 |
|
NA |
ocr7matc3a
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norway allow immigrants from Muslim countries to come and live
here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think Norway should allow immigrants from Muslim countries to
come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran24=1 AND ran24_1=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Allow to come and live here |
157 |
60.6% |
0.60617761 |
| 2 |
Do not allow to come and live here |
88 |
34.0% |
0.33976834 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
5.4% |
0.05405405 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4430 |
|
NA |
ocr7matc4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of these three statements: Increase assistance to
the poor, decrease tax on fuel, allow large corporations to pollute
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree with?
We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran24=1 AND ran24_1=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
44 |
15.7% |
0.157142857 |
| 2 |
1 |
191 |
68.2% |
0.682142857 |
| 3 |
2 |
43 |
15.4% |
0.153571429 |
| 4 |
3 |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003571429 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003571429 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4409 |
|
NA |
ocr7matc4a
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norway allow refugees from Muslim countries to come and live
here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think Norway should allow refugees from Muslim countries to come
and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran24=1 AND ran24_1=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Allow to come and live here |
186 |
66.4% |
0.66428571 |
| 2 |
Do not allow to come and live here |
89 |
31.8% |
0.31785714 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.8% |
0.01785714 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4409 |
|
NA |
ocr7matt1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of these four statements: Increase assistance to the
poor, decrease tax on fuel, allow large corporations to pollute, people
from Muslim countries live here
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with? We
don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment Norway should allow people from Muslim countries
to come and live here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran24=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
73 |
9.8% |
0.09759358 |
| 2 |
1 |
288 |
38.5% |
0.38502674 |
| 3 |
2 |
314 |
42.0% |
0.41978610 |
| 4 |
3 |
47 |
6.3% |
0.06283422 |
| 5 |
4 |
10 |
1.3% |
0.01336898 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.1% |
0.02139037 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3941 |
|
NA |
ocr7matt2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of these four statements: Increase assistance to the
poor, decrease tax on fuel, allow large corporations to pollute, people
from Eastern European countries live here
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with? We
don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor
Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow
large corporations to pollute the environment Norway should allow people
from Eastern European countries to come and live here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran24=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
121 |
15.9% |
0.15879265 |
| 2 |
1 |
338 |
44.4% |
0.44356955 |
| 3 |
2 |
263 |
34.5% |
0.34514436 |
| 4 |
3 |
30 |
3.9% |
0.03937008 |
| 5 |
4 |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.3% |
0.01312336 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3927 |
|
NA |
ocr7matt3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of these four statements: Increase assistance to the
poor, decrease tax on fuel, allow large corporations to pollute,
immigrants from Muslim countries live here
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with? We
don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment Norway should allow immigrants from Muslim
countries to come and live here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran24=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
103 |
13.9% |
0.13862719 |
| 2 |
1 |
312 |
42.0% |
0.41991925 |
| 3 |
2 |
283 |
38.1% |
0.38088829 |
| 4 |
3 |
30 |
4.0% |
0.04037685 |
| 5 |
4 |
4 |
0.5% |
0.00538358 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.5% |
0.01480485 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3946 |
|
NA |
ocr7matt4
|
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of these four statements: Increase assistance to the
poor, decrease tax on fuel, allow large corporations to pollute,
refugees from Muslim countries live here
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with? We
don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease
the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to
pollute the environment Norway should allow refugees from Muslim
countries to come and live here
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran24=6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
89 |
11.7% |
0.116951380 |
| 2 |
1 |
281 |
36.9% |
0.369250986 |
| 3 |
2 |
346 |
45.5% |
0.454664915 |
| 4 |
3 |
32 |
4.2% |
0.042049934 |
| 5 |
4 |
10 |
1.3% |
0.013140604 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003942181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3928 |
|
NA |
r7ran25
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1078] [Invalid:3611]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
207 |
19.2% |
0.1920223 |
| 2 |
2 |
237 |
22.0% |
0.2198516 |
| 3 |
3 |
211 |
19.6% |
0.1957328 |
| 4 |
4 |
213 |
19.8% |
0.1975881 |
| 5 |
5 |
210 |
19.5% |
0.1948052 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3611 |
|
NA |
r7ran26
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1078] [Invalid:3611]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
212 |
19.7% |
0.1966605 |
| 2 |
2 |
216 |
20.0% |
0.2003711 |
| 3 |
3 |
197 |
18.3% |
0.1827458 |
| 4 |
4 |
220 |
20.4% |
0.2040816 |
| 5 |
5 |
233 |
21.6% |
0.2161410 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3611 |
|
NA |
r7ran27
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1078] [Invalid:3611]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
202 |
18.7% |
0.1873840 |
| 2 |
2 |
209 |
19.4% |
0.1938776 |
| 3 |
3 |
235 |
21.8% |
0.2179963 |
| 4 |
4 |
231 |
21.4% |
0.2142857 |
| 5 |
5 |
201 |
18.6% |
0.1864564 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3611 |
|
NA |
r7ran28
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1078] [Invalid:3611]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
233 |
21.6% |
0.2161410 |
| 2 |
2 |
205 |
19.0% |
0.1901670 |
| 3 |
3 |
203 |
18.8% |
0.1883117 |
| 4 |
4 |
213 |
19.8% |
0.1975881 |
| 5 |
5 |
224 |
20.8% |
0.2077922 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3611 |
|
NA |
r7ran29
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1078] [Invalid:3611]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
223 |
20.7% |
0.2068646 |
| 2 |
2 |
187 |
17.3% |
0.1734694 |
| 3 |
3 |
229 |
21.2% |
0.2124304 |
| 4 |
4 |
230 |
21.3% |
0.2133581 |
| 5 |
5 |
209 |
19.4% |
0.1938776 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3611 |
|
NA |
r7ran30
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1078] [Invalid:3611]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
199 |
18.5% |
0.1846011 |
| 2 |
2 |
209 |
19.4% |
0.1938776 |
| 3 |
3 |
224 |
20.8% |
0.2077922 |
| 4 |
4 |
214 |
19.9% |
0.1985158 |
| 5 |
5 |
232 |
21.5% |
0.2152134 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3611 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Appropriate to investigate Gazprom
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In April 2015, the European Union opened an investigation into the
business practices of Gazprom.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, is this investigation into the Russian energy giant
Gazprom appropriate?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran25=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very appropriate |
67 |
32.4% |
0.323671498 |
| 2 |
Somewhat appropriate |
33 |
15.9% |
0.159420290 |
| 3 |
Neither appropriate, nor inappropriate |
15 |
7.2% |
0.072463768 |
| 4 |
Somewhat inappropriate |
5 |
2.4% |
0.024154589 |
| 5 |
Not at all appropriate |
2 |
1.0% |
0.009661836 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
81 |
39.1% |
0.391304348 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004830918 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.014492754 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4482 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Appropriate to investigate Gazprom: Put the business under pressure
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In April 2015, the European Union opened an investigation into the
business practices of Gazprom. This put the Russian energy group under
pressure and gave its European competitors an advantage.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, is this investigation into the Russian energy giant
Gazprom appropriate?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran25=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very appropriate |
60 |
25.3% |
0.25316456 |
| 2 |
Somewhat appropriate |
51 |
21.5% |
0.21518987 |
| 3 |
Neither appropriate, nor inappropriate |
27 |
11.4% |
0.11392405 |
| 4 |
Somewhat inappropriate |
7 |
3.0% |
0.02953586 |
| 5 |
Not at all appropriate |
8 |
3.4% |
0.03375527 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
74 |
31.2% |
0.31223629 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
5 |
2.1% |
0.02109705 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.1% |
0.02109705 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4452 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Appropriate to investigate Gazprom: Put the business under pressure
according to Gazprom/Russian media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In April 2015, the European Union opened an investigation into the
business practices of Gazprom. According to Gazprom and Russian media,
this put the Russian energy group under pressure and gave its European
competitors an advantage.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, is this investigation into the Russian energy giant
Gazprom appropriate?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran25=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very appropriate |
53 |
25.1% |
0.251184834 |
| 2 |
Somewhat appropriate |
44 |
20.9% |
0.208530806 |
| 3 |
Neither appropriate, nor inappropriate |
22 |
10.4% |
0.104265403 |
| 4 |
Somewhat inappropriate |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004739336 |
| 5 |
Not at all appropriate |
4 |
1.9% |
0.018957346 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
78 |
37.0% |
0.369668246 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
2 |
0.9% |
0.009478673 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.3% |
0.033175355 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4478 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Appropriate to investigate Gazprom: Unfair prices for Eastern European
countries
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In April 2015, the European Union opened an investigation into the
business practices of Gazprom. There are indications that Gazprom set
unfair prices for Eastern European countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, is this investigation into the Russian energy giant
Gazprom appropriate?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran25=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very appropriate |
64 |
30.0% |
0.30046948 |
| 2 |
Somewhat appropriate |
37 |
17.4% |
0.17370892 |
| 3 |
Neither appropriate, nor inappropriate |
19 |
8.9% |
0.08920188 |
| 4 |
Somewhat inappropriate |
4 |
1.9% |
0.01877934 |
| 5 |
Not at all appropriate |
4 |
1.9% |
0.01877934 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
74 |
34.7% |
0.34741784 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01408451 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
3.8% |
0.03755869 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4476 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Appropriate to investigate Gazprom: Unfair prices for Eastern European
countries according to antitrust authorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In April 2015, the European Union opened an investigation into the
business practices of Gazprom. According to the European antitrust
authorities and other European institutions, there are indications that
Gazprom set unfair prices for Eastern European countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, is this investigation into the Russian energy giant
Gazprom appropriate?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran25=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very appropriate |
74 |
35.2% |
0.35238095 |
| 2 |
Somewhat appropriate |
48 |
22.9% |
0.22857143 |
| 3 |
Neither appropriate, nor inappropriate |
12 |
5.7% |
0.05714286 |
| 4 |
Somewhat inappropriate |
2 |
1.0% |
0.00952381 |
| 5 |
Not at all appropriate |
2 |
1.0% |
0.00952381 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
65 |
31.0% |
0.30952381 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
2 |
1.0% |
0.00952381 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.4% |
0.02380952 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4479 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Rating larger military presence Eastern Europe
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the near future, NATO will increase troops and military equipment in
Eastern Europe significantly.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you rate the larger NATO military presence in Eastern Europe?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran26=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
20 |
9.4% |
0.094339623 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
42 |
19.8% |
0.198113208 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
35 |
16.5% |
0.165094340 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
58 |
27.4% |
0.273584906 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
27 |
12.7% |
0.127358491 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
26 |
12.3% |
0.122641509 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004716981 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.014150943 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4477 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Rating larger military presence Eastern Europe: May escalate small
incidents
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the near future, NATO will increase troops and military equipment in
Eastern Europe significantly. Such a rapid increase may escalate small
incidents into regional wars.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you rate the larger NATO military presence in Eastern Europe?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran26=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
7 |
3.2% |
0.03240741 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
39 |
18.1% |
0.18055556 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
36 |
16.7% |
0.16666667 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
62 |
28.7% |
0.28703704 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
41 |
19.0% |
0.18981481 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
25 |
11.6% |
0.11574074 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01388889 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01388889 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4473 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Rating larger military presence Eastern Europe: May escalate small
incidents, pointed out by Russian experts
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the near future, NATO will increase troops and military equipment in
Eastern Europe significantly. Russian experts point out that such a
rapid increase could escalate even small incidents into regional wars.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you rate the larger NATO military presence in Eastern Europe?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran26=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
10 |
5.1% |
0.050761421 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
34 |
17.3% |
0.172588832 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
28 |
14.2% |
0.142131980 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
53 |
26.9% |
0.269035533 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
51 |
25.9% |
0.258883249 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
15 |
7.6% |
0.076142132 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005076142 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.5% |
0.025380711 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4492 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Rating larger military presence Eastern Europe: Designed to support NATO
allies
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the near future, NATO will increase troops and military equipment in
Eastern Europe significantly. This action is designed to support NATO
allies in the face of Russian aggression in Eastern Ukraine.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you rate the larger NATO military presence in Eastern Europe?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran26=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
23 |
10.5% |
0.10454545 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
58 |
26.4% |
0.26363636 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
38 |
17.3% |
0.17272727 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
53 |
24.1% |
0.24090909 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
23 |
10.5% |
0.10454545 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
19 |
8.6% |
0.08636364 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01363636 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01363636 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4469 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Rating larger military presence Eastern Europe: Designed to support NATO
allies, pointed out by US State Department
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the near future, NATO will increase troops and military equipment in
Eastern Europe significantly. As the US State Department pointed out,
this action is designed to support NATO allies in the face of Russian
aggression in Eastern Ukraine.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you rate the larger NATO military presence in Eastern Europe?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran26=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
15 |
6.4% |
0.064377682 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
56 |
24.0% |
0.240343348 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
34 |
14.6% |
0.145922747 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
58 |
24.9% |
0.248927039 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
39 |
16.7% |
0.167381974 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
25 |
10.7% |
0.107296137 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004291845 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.1% |
0.021459227 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4456 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluation of protests that led to the resignation of Yanukovych
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In March 2014, mass demonstrations forced Ukrainian President Yanukovych
to resign.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you evaluate the protests that led to the resignation of
President Yanukovych?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran27=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
25 |
12.4% |
0.12376238 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
37 |
18.3% |
0.18316832 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
34 |
16.8% |
0.16831683 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
7 |
3.5% |
0.03465347 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
5 |
2.5% |
0.02475248 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
79 |
39.1% |
0.39108911 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
8 |
4.0% |
0.03960396 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.5% |
0.03465347 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4487 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluation of protests that led to the resignation of Yanukovych: Coup
to expand the sphere of influence of the West
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In March 2014, mass demonstrations forced Ukrainian President Yanukovych
to resign. These protests and the subsequent events have been called a
coup, using the guise of promoting democracy to expand the sphere of
influence of the West.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you evaluate the protests that led to the resignation of
President Yanukovych?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran27=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
26 |
12.4% |
0.12440191 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
39 |
18.7% |
0.18660287 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
35 |
16.7% |
0.16746411 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
18 |
8.6% |
0.08612440 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
6 |
2.9% |
0.02870813 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
71 |
34.0% |
0.33971292 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
4 |
1.9% |
0.01913876 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
4.8% |
0.04784689 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4480 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove3_3
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluation of protests that led to the resignation of Yanukovych: Coup
to expand the sphere of influence of the West, according to Russian
leadership
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In March 2014, mass demonstrations forced Ukrainian President Yanukovych
to resign. The Russian leadership has called these protests and the
subsequent events a coup, using the guise of promoting democracy to
expand the sphere of influence of the West.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you evaluate the protests that led to the resignation of
President Yanukovych?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran27=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
33 |
14.0% |
0.14042553 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
68 |
28.9% |
0.28936170 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
41 |
17.4% |
0.17446809 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
5 |
2.1% |
0.02127660 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
10 |
4.3% |
0.04255319 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
65 |
27.7% |
0.27659574 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
4 |
1.7% |
0.01702128 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
3.8% |
0.03829787 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4454 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove3_4
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluation of protests that led to the resignation of Yanukovych:
Undertaken by the Ukrainian people, led to free elections and opened a
European perspective
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In March 2014, mass demonstrations forced Ukrainian President Yanukovych
to resign. The protests against Yanukovych were undertaken by the
Ukrainian people, led to free elections and opened a European
perspective for Ukraine.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you evaluate the protests that led to the resignation of
President Yanukovych?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran27=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
84 |
36.4% |
0.363636364 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
70 |
30.3% |
0.303030303 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
20 |
8.7% |
0.086580087 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
5 |
2.2% |
0.021645022 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004329004 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
40 |
17.3% |
0.173160173 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
4 |
1.7% |
0.017316017 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.0% |
0.030303030 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4458 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove3_5
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluation of protests that led to the resignation of Yanukovych:
Undertaken by the Ukrainian people, led to free elections and opened a
European perspective, noted by Norwegian/Western politicians
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In March 2014, mass demonstrations forced Ukrainian President Yanukovych
to resign. Norwegian and other Western politicians have noted that the
protests against Yanukovych were undertaken by the Ukrainian people, led
to free elections and opened a European perspective for Ukraine.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you evaluate the protests that led to the resignation of
President Yanukovych?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran27=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very positively |
49 |
24.4% |
0.24378109 |
| 2 |
Somewhat positively |
54 |
26.9% |
0.26865672 |
| 3 |
Neither positively, nor negatively |
26 |
12.9% |
0.12935323 |
| 4 |
Somewhat negatively |
11 |
5.5% |
0.05472637 |
| 5 |
Very negatively |
6 |
3.0% |
0.02985075 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
47 |
23.4% |
0.23383085 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01492537 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.5% |
0.02487562 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4488 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Reliability commitment of NATO to assist Turkey
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Turkey relies on the support of NATO in case of a military conflict with
Russia.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How reliable do you think is the commitment of NATO to assist Turkey?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran28=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very reliable |
13 |
5.6% |
0.055793991 |
| 2 |
Rather reliable |
70 |
30.0% |
0.300429185 |
| 3 |
Partly reliable |
70 |
30.0% |
0.300429185 |
| 4 |
Rather unreliable |
30 |
12.9% |
0.128755365 |
| 5 |
Not at all reliable |
3 |
1.3% |
0.012875536 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
40 |
17.2% |
0.171673820 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
2 |
0.9% |
0.008583691 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.1% |
0.021459227 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4456 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Reliability commitment of NATO to assist Turkey: Could hesitate because
of Erdogans policies
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Turkey relies on the support of NATO in case of a military conflict with
Russia. However, Western allies have been increasingly critical of the
policies of the Turkish President Erdogan. NATO could therefore hesitate
to intervene if Turkey gets in a military conflict with Russia over
Syria.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How reliable do you think is the commitment of NATO to assist Turkey?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran28=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very reliable |
11 |
5.4% |
0.053658537 |
| 2 |
Rather reliable |
57 |
27.8% |
0.278048780 |
| 3 |
Partly reliable |
52 |
25.4% |
0.253658537 |
| 4 |
Rather unreliable |
31 |
15.1% |
0.151219512 |
| 5 |
Not at all reliable |
2 |
1.0% |
0.009756098 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
41 |
20.0% |
0.200000000 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
5 |
2.4% |
0.024390244 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.9% |
0.029268293 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4484 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove4_3
|
Variable label:
|
Reliability commitment of NATO to assist Turkey: Could hesitate because
of Erdogans policies, argued by Russian government
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Turkey relies on the support of NATO in case of a military conflict with
Russia. However, Western allies have been increasingly critical of the
policies of the Turkish President Erdogan. The Russian government has
argued that NATO could therefore hesitate to intervene if Turkey gets in
a military conflict with Russia over Syria.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How reliable do you think is the commitment of NATO to assist Turkey?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran28=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very reliable |
17 |
8.4% |
0.083743842 |
| 2 |
Rather reliable |
48 |
23.6% |
0.236453202 |
| 3 |
Partly reliable |
62 |
30.5% |
0.305418719 |
| 4 |
Rather unreliable |
12 |
5.9% |
0.059113300 |
| 5 |
Not at all reliable |
2 |
1.0% |
0.009852217 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
53 |
26.1% |
0.261083744 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
2 |
1.0% |
0.009852217 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.4% |
0.034482759 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4486 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove4_4
|
Variable label:
|
Reliability commitment of NATO to assist Turkey: Alliance never
neglected its obligations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Turkey relies on the support of NATO in case of a military conflict with
Russia. In the history of NATO, there has never been a case in which the
Alliance has neglected its obligations and refused to support a member.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How reliable do you think is the commitment of NATO to assist Turkey?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran28=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very reliable |
25 |
11.7% |
0.117370892 |
| 2 |
Rather reliable |
66 |
31.0% |
0.309859155 |
| 3 |
Partly reliable |
56 |
26.3% |
0.262910798 |
| 4 |
Rather unreliable |
21 |
9.9% |
0.098591549 |
| 5 |
Not at all reliable |
3 |
1.4% |
0.014084507 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
38 |
17.8% |
0.178403756 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004694836 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.014084507 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4476 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove4_5
|
Variable label:
|
Reliability commitment of NATO to assist Turkey: Alliance never
neglected its obligations, pointed out by NATO officials
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Turkey relies on the support of NATO in case of a military conflict with
Russia. NATO officials point out that, in the history of NATO, there has
never been a case in which the Alliance has neglected its obligations
and refused to support a member.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How reliable do you think is the commitment of NATO to assist Turkey?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran28=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very reliable |
27 |
12.1% |
0.120535714 |
| 2 |
Rather reliable |
66 |
29.5% |
0.294642857 |
| 3 |
Partly reliable |
66 |
29.5% |
0.294642857 |
| 4 |
Rather unreliable |
14 |
6.2% |
0.062500000 |
| 5 |
Not at all reliable |
2 |
0.9% |
0.008928571 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
46 |
20.5% |
0.205357143 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004464286 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.9% |
0.008928571 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4465 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove5_1
|
Variable label:
|
How often does media in Norway self-censor so as not to cast migrants in
a bad light
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
It can be difficult to find reporting in the media about the dramatic
challenges of integrating refugees and foreigners, such as those visible
in migrant-populated Rinkeby and Husby areas of Stockholm.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you think media in Norway self-censors its reporting so as
not to cast migrants in a bad light?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran29=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Always |
10 |
4.5% |
0.04484305 |
| 2 |
Often |
49 |
22.0% |
0.21973094 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
79 |
35.4% |
0.35426009 |
| 4 |
Seldom |
41 |
18.4% |
0.18385650 |
| 5 |
Never |
4 |
1.8% |
0.01793722 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
35 |
15.7% |
0.15695067 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.2% |
0.02242152 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4466 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove5_2
|
Variable label:
|
How often does media in Norway self-censor so as not to cast migrants in
a bad light: Can be accused of racism, press-freedom has suffered
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
It can be difficult to find reporting in the media about the dramatic
challenges of integrating refugees and foreigners, such as those visible
in migrant-populated Rinkeby and Husby areas of Stockholm. Because media
publishing information on the issue can be accused of racism,
press-freedom in Scandinavia has suffered.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you think media in Norway self-censors its reporting so as
not to cast migrants in a bad light?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran29=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Always |
3 |
1.6% |
0.016042781 |
| 2 |
Often |
43 |
23.0% |
0.229946524 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
78 |
41.7% |
0.417112299 |
| 4 |
Seldom |
32 |
17.1% |
0.171122995 |
| 5 |
Never |
2 |
1.1% |
0.010695187 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
26 |
13.9% |
0.139037433 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005347594 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.1% |
0.010695187 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4502 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove5_3
|
Variable label:
|
How often does media in Norway self-censor so as not to cast migrants in
a bad light: Can be accused of racism, press-freedom has suffered,
suggested by Sputnik
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
It can be difficult to find reporting in the media about the dramatic
challenges of integrating refugees and foreigners, such as those visible
in migrant-populated Rinkeby and Husby areas of Stockholm. Sputnik, the
news agency founded by the Russian government, has suggested that
because media publishing information on the issue can be accused of
racism, press-freedom in Scandinavia has suffered.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you think media in Norway self-censors its reporting so as
not to cast migrants in a bad light?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran29=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Always |
8 |
3.5% |
0.03493450 |
| 2 |
Often |
47 |
20.5% |
0.20524017 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
98 |
42.8% |
0.42794760 |
| 4 |
Seldom |
37 |
16.2% |
0.16157205 |
| 5 |
Never |
8 |
3.5% |
0.03493450 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
26 |
11.4% |
0.11353712 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.2% |
0.02183406 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4460 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove5_4
|
Variable label:
|
How often does media in Norway self-censor so as not to cast migrants in
a bad light: NRK offered an honest look
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
It can be difficult to find reporting in the media about the dramatic
challenges of integrating refugees and foreigners, such as those visible
in migrant-populated Rinkeby and Husby areas of Stockholm. The Norwegian
channel NRK has sent a team and offered an honest look at the conditions
in those areas.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you think media in Norway self-censors its reporting so as
not to cast migrants in a bad light?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran29=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Always |
7 |
3.0% |
0.03043478 |
| 2 |
Often |
54 |
23.5% |
0.23478261 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
92 |
40.0% |
0.40000000 |
| 4 |
Seldom |
45 |
19.6% |
0.19565217 |
| 5 |
Never |
6 |
2.6% |
0.02608696 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
23 |
10.0% |
0.10000000 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01304348 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4459 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove5_5
|
Variable label:
|
How often does media in Norway self-censor so as not to cast migrants in
a bad light: NRK offered an honest look, pointed out by media experts
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
It is sometimes difficult to find reporting in the media about the
challenges faced when integrating refugees and foreigners, visible in
places such as Rinkeby and Husby areas of Stockholm. Media experts point
to the fact that the Norwegian channel NRK has sent a team and offered
an honest look at the conditions in those areas, as proof that media
reporting is free in Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you think media in Norway self-censors its reporting so as
not to cast migrants in a bad light?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran29=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Always |
5 |
2.4% |
0.02392344 |
| 2 |
Often |
45 |
21.5% |
0.21531100 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
85 |
40.7% |
0.40669856 |
| 4 |
Seldom |
27 |
12.9% |
0.12918660 |
| 5 |
Never |
5 |
2.4% |
0.02392344 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
35 |
16.7% |
0.16746411 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.3% |
0.03349282 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4480 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove6_1
|
Variable label:
|
How justified is an increase in military spending
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway’s Ministry of Defense has proposed a Long Term Plan for the
country’s military under which defense spending will increase by more
than NOK 160 billion over the next two decades.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your view, how justified is such a big increase in military spending?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran30=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very justified |
68 |
34.2% |
0.34170854 |
| 2 |
Somewhat justified |
64 |
32.2% |
0.32160804 |
| 3 |
Neither justified, nor unjustified |
14 |
7.0% |
0.07035176 |
| 4 |
Somewhat unjustified |
19 |
9.5% |
0.09547739 |
| 5 |
Not at all justified |
7 |
3.5% |
0.03517588 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
23 |
11.6% |
0.11557789 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.0% |
0.02010050 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4490 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove6_2
|
Variable label:
|
How justified is an increase in military spending: May provoke a russian
troop buildup
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway’s Ministry of Defense has proposed a Long Term Plan for the
country’s military under which defense spending will increase by more
than NOK 160 billion over the next two decades. Such an increase may
provoke a troop buildup by Russia on its Western borders as a defensive
reaction to Norway’s increased capabilities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your view, how justified is such a big increase in military spending?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran30=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very justified |
49 |
23.4% |
0.234449761 |
| 2 |
Somewhat justified |
67 |
32.1% |
0.320574163 |
| 3 |
Neither justified, nor unjustified |
26 |
12.4% |
0.124401914 |
| 4 |
Somewhat unjustified |
25 |
12.0% |
0.119617225 |
| 5 |
Not at all justified |
15 |
7.2% |
0.071770335 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
25 |
12.0% |
0.119617225 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004784689 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004784689 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4480 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove6_3
|
Variable label:
|
How justified is an increase in military spending: May provoke a russian
troop buildup, warned by Lavrov
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway’s Ministry of Defense has proposed a Long Term Plan for the
country’s military under which defense spending will increase by more
than NOK 160 billion over the next two decades. Russian foreign minister
Lavrov has warned that such an increase may provoke a troop buildup by
Russia on its Western borders as a defensive reaction to Norway’s
increased capabilities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your view, how justified is such a big increase in military spending?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran30=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very justified |
52 |
23.2% |
0.232142857 |
| 2 |
Somewhat justified |
74 |
33.0% |
0.330357143 |
| 3 |
Neither justified, nor unjustified |
22 |
9.8% |
0.098214286 |
| 4 |
Somewhat unjustified |
29 |
12.9% |
0.129464286 |
| 5 |
Not at all justified |
12 |
5.4% |
0.053571429 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
34 |
15.2% |
0.151785714 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004464286 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4465 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove6_4
|
Variable label:
|
How justified is an increase in military spending: Necessary response to
the Baltic Sea region
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway’s Ministry of Defense has proposed a Long Term Plan for the
country’s military under which defense spending will increase by more
than NOK 160 billion over the next two decades. The measures are a
necessary response to Russia’s growing military presence in the Baltic
Sea region and to the deteriorating security situation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your view, how justified is such a big increase in military spending?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran30=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very justified |
88 |
41.1% |
0.41121495 |
| 2 |
Somewhat justified |
60 |
28.0% |
0.28037383 |
| 3 |
Neither justified, nor unjustified |
11 |
5.1% |
0.05140187 |
| 4 |
Somewhat unjustified |
21 |
9.8% |
0.09813084 |
| 5 |
Not at all justified |
12 |
5.6% |
0.05607477 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
16 |
7.5% |
0.07476636 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.8% |
0.02803738 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4475 |
|
NA |
ocr7marinove6_5
|
Variable label:
|
How justified is an increase in military spending: Necessary response to
the Baltic Sea region, argued by Norwegian security experts
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Norway’s Ministry of Defense has proposed a Long Term Plan for the
country’s military under which defense spending will increase by more
than NOK 160 billion over the next two decades. Norwegian security
experts have argued that such an increase is necessary to response to
Russia’s growing military presence in the Baltic Sea region and to the
deteriorating security situation.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your view, how justified is such a big increase in military spending?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran30=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very justified |
81 |
34.9% |
0.34913793 |
| 2 |
Somewhat justified |
85 |
36.6% |
0.36637931 |
| 3 |
Neither justified, nor unjustified |
21 |
9.1% |
0.09051724 |
| 4 |
Somewhat unjustified |
13 |
5.6% |
0.05603448 |
| 5 |
Not at all justified |
8 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
18 |
7.8% |
0.07758621 |
| 7 |
Not specified |
2 |
0.9% |
0.00862069 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.7% |
0.01724138 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4457 |
|
NA |
r7randomizedblockorder
|
Variable label:
|
randomizedBlockOrder
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores the order which OCR7MarinovE1-E6 is asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7ocrecsm_mobile2
|
Variable label:
|
R7OCRECSM_mobile2
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1176] [Invalid:3513]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Mobile - no |
875 |
74.4% |
0.7440476 |
| 1 |
Mobile - yes |
301 |
25.6% |
0.2559524 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3513 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm3a1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To help us improve our questions in later surveys, we would like to ask
you to answer some questions that bears a resemblance to the ones you
responded to ealier. Don’t try to remember what you responded earlier,
think of them as entirely new questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=1 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=0. Version for desktop
and tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM3A1_mobile.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm3a1_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To help us improve our questions in later surveys, we would like to ask
you to answer some questions that bears a resemblance to the ones you
responded to ealier. Don’t try to remember what you responded earlier,
think of them as entirely new questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=1 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM3A1.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm3a2
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian backround in deciding whether someone could
come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=1 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=0. Version for desktop
and tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM3A2_mobile.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm3a2_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian backround in deciding whether someone could
come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=1 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM3A2.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm3a3
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=1 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=0. Version for desktop
and tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM3A3_mobile. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm3a3_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=1 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM3A3. ]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm3b1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To help us improve our questions in later surveys, we would like to ask
you to answer some questions that bears a resemblance to the ones you
responded to ealier. Don’t try to remember what you responded earlier,
think of them as entirely new questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=0. Version for desktop
and tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM3B1_mobile.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm3b1_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To help us improve our questions in later surveys, we would like to ask
you to answer some questions that bears a resemblance to the ones you
responded to ealier. Don’t try to remember what you responded earlier,
think of them as entirely new questions.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM3B1.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm3b2
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian backround in deciding whether someone could
come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=0. Version for desktop
and tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM3B2_mobile.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm3b2_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian backround in deciding whether someone could
come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM3B2.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm3b3
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=0. Version for desktop
and tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM3B3_mobile]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm3b3_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM3B3.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm3c1_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is good education in deciding whether someone could come
and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having good educational qualifications should
be in deciding whether someone born, brought up and living outside
Norway should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran20=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
122 |
29.3% |
0.29256595 |
| 2 |
2 |
99 |
23.7% |
0.23741007 |
| 3 |
3 |
109 |
26.1% |
0.26139089 |
| 4 |
4 |
57 |
13.7% |
0.13669065 |
| 5 |
Completely |
16 |
3.8% |
0.03836930 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
3.4% |
0.03357314 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4272 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm3c2_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is a Christian backround in deciding whether someone could
come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think coming from a Christian background should be
in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran20=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
264 |
63.3% |
0.63309353 |
| 2 |
2 |
47 |
11.3% |
0.11270983 |
| 3 |
3 |
51 |
12.2% |
0.12230216 |
| 4 |
4 |
29 |
7.0% |
0.06954436 |
| 5 |
Completely |
10 |
2.4% |
0.02398082 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
3.8% |
0.03836930 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4272 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm3c3_1
|
Variable label:
|
How important is having skills that Norway needs in deciding whether
someone could come and live here?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think having work skills that Norway needs should
be in deciding whether someone should be able to come and live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran20=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
91 |
21.8% |
0.21822542 |
| 2 |
2 |
96 |
23.0% |
0.23021583 |
| 3 |
3 |
108 |
25.9% |
0.25899281 |
| 4 |
4 |
82 |
19.7% |
0.19664269 |
| 5 |
Completely |
26 |
6.2% |
0.06235012 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
3.4% |
0.03357314 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4272 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm4a1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=1 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=0. Version for desktop
and tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM4A1_mobile.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm4a1_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=1 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM4A1.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm4a2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=1 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=0. Version for desktop
and tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM4A2_mobile.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm4a2_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=1 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM4A2.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm4a3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=1 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=0. Version for desktop
and tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM4A3_mobile.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm4a3_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=1 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM4A3.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 25.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm4b1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=0. Version for desktop
and tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM4B1_mobile.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm4b1_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM4B1.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-43]
|
r7ocrecsm4b2
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=0. Version for desktop
and tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM4B2_mobile.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm4b2_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM4B2.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm4b3
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=0. Version for desktop
and tablet users. Mobile users are asked R7OCRECSM4B3_mobile.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm4b3_mobile
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2, ran20=2 AND R7OCRECSM_mobile2=1. Version for mobile
users due to layout. Desktop/tablet users are asked R7OCRECSM4B3.]
[Slider is used to give answers. Departure positition of the marker is
set to value 1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-50]
|
r7ocrecsm4c1_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent should the Supreme Court’s power in controversial issues
be reduced?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, to what extent do you think the Norwegian Supreme Court’s
power to decide certain types of controversial issues should be reduced?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran20=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
154 |
36.9% |
0.36930456 |
| 2 |
2 |
92 |
22.1% |
0.22062350 |
| 3 |
3 |
116 |
27.8% |
0.27817746 |
| 4 |
4 |
19 |
4.6% |
0.04556355 |
| 5 |
Completely |
6 |
1.4% |
0.01438849 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
7.2% |
0.07194245 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4272 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm4c2_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent does the Supreme Court favor certain groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the decisions of the Norwegian Supreme Court
favor certain groups more than others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran20=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
124 |
29.7% |
0.297362110 |
| 2 |
2 |
107 |
25.7% |
0.256594724 |
| 3 |
3 |
104 |
24.9% |
0.249400480 |
| 4 |
4 |
44 |
10.6% |
0.105515588 |
| 5 |
Completely |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004796163 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
8.6% |
0.086330935 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4272 |
|
NA |
r7ocrecsm4c3_1
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent could the Supreme Court be dissolved, if it makes several
decisions most people disagree with?
|
|
Literal question:
|
And to what extent do you think that If the Norwegian Supreme Court
starts to make several decisions that most people disagree with, the
institution might just as well be dissolved?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran20=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
173 |
41.5% |
0.41486811 |
| 2 |
2 |
86 |
20.6% |
0.20623501 |
| 3 |
3 |
84 |
20.1% |
0.20143885 |
| 4 |
4 |
34 |
8.2% |
0.08153477 |
| 5 |
Completely |
7 |
1.7% |
0.01678657 |
| 97 |
No answer |
33 |
7.9% |
0.07913669 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4272 |
|
NA |
r7ran37
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=1 OR u=4. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=1 OR u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2323] [Invalid:2366]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
1140 |
49.1% |
0.4907447 |
| 2 |
2 |
1183 |
50.9% |
0.5092553 |
| Sysmiss |
|
2366 |
|
NA |
r7qreview2a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Questions in this survey
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested to know more about how you as a participant perceive
our surveys. All in all, how satisfied are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The questions you have answered this far in this survey?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 OR u=4, and if ran37=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
82 |
7.0% |
0.06984668 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
637 |
54.3% |
0.54258944 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
366 |
31.2% |
0.31175468 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
34 |
2.9% |
0.02896082 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
8 |
0.7% |
0.00681431 |
| 97 |
No answer |
47 |
4.0% |
0.04003407 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3515 |
|
NA |
r7qreview2a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested to know more about how you as a participant perceive
our surveys. All in all, how satisfied are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Being a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 OR u=4, and if ran37=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
159 |
13.5% |
0.135434412 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
618 |
52.6% |
0.526405451 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
292 |
24.9% |
0.248722317 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
45 |
3.8% |
0.038330494 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007666099 |
| 97 |
No answer |
51 |
4.3% |
0.043441227 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3515 |
|
NA |
r7ran18
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1149] [Invalid:3540]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
591 |
51.4% |
0.5143603 |
| 2 |
2 |
558 |
48.6% |
0.4856397 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3540 |
|
NA |
r7pad4a
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution to joint kitty: Random person excluded
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now ask you to make a decision whereby three persons will be selected
to receive money. The following situation is the background for the
decision you must make:
Three participants of the Norwegian Citizens Panel are put together in a
group. Every person in the group receives 1,000 kroner to begin with.
Each person has to choose how much of his or her 1,000 kroner will be
put into a joint kitty for the group. A person is drawn at random to be
excluded from the group and is rewarded with 1,750 kroner. The two
remaining people’s contribution to the kitty is increased by 50 per cent
and then divided equally between the two.
The final cash prize paid to the participants selected to receive money
will be the individuals share of the joint kitty and the money being
kept.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you are one of the participants drawn out to win 1,000 kroner, how
much would you put into the joint kitty?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran18=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
42 |
7.1% |
0.071065990 |
| 2 |
100 |
15 |
2.5% |
0.025380711 |
| 3 |
200 |
33 |
5.6% |
0.055837563 |
| 4 |
300 |
49 |
8.3% |
0.082910321 |
| 5 |
400 |
22 |
3.7% |
0.037225042 |
| 6 |
500 |
199 |
33.7% |
0.336717428 |
| 7 |
600 |
17 |
2.9% |
0.028764805 |
| 8 |
700 |
9 |
1.5% |
0.015228426 |
| 9 |
800 |
9 |
1.5% |
0.015228426 |
| 10 |
900 |
5 |
0.8% |
0.008460237 |
| 11 |
1000 |
157 |
26.6% |
0.265651438 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
5.8% |
0.057529611 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4098 |
|
NA |
r7pad4b
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution to joint kitty: Person who contributes the least excluded
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now ask you to make a decision whereby three persons will be selected
to receive money. The following situation is the background for the
decision you must make:
Three participants of the Norwegian Citizens Panel are put together in a
group. Every person in the group receives 1,000 kroner to begin with.
Each person has to choose how much of his or her 1,000 kroner will be
put into a joint kitty for the group. The person in the group who puts
in the least is excluded from the group and is rewarded with 1,750
kroner. The two remaining people’s contribution to the kitty is
increased by 50 per cent and then divided equally between the two.
The final cash prize paid to the participants selected to receive money
will be the individuals share of the joint kitty and the money being
kept.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you are one of the participants drawn out to win 1,000 kroner, how
much would you put into the joint kitty?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran18=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
76 |
13.6% |
0.13620072 |
| 2 |
100 |
16 |
2.9% |
0.02867384 |
| 3 |
200 |
22 |
3.9% |
0.03942652 |
| 4 |
300 |
38 |
6.8% |
0.06810036 |
| 5 |
400 |
24 |
4.3% |
0.04301075 |
| 6 |
500 |
161 |
28.9% |
0.28853047 |
| 7 |
600 |
14 |
2.5% |
0.02508961 |
| 8 |
700 |
13 |
2.3% |
0.02329749 |
| 9 |
800 |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02688172 |
| 10 |
900 |
7 |
1.3% |
0.01254480 |
| 11 |
1000 |
145 |
26.0% |
0.25985663 |
| 97 |
No answer |
27 |
4.8% |
0.04838710 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4131 |
|
NA |
r7ran19
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1173] [Invalid:3516]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
213 |
18.2% |
0.1815857 |
| 2 |
2 |
206 |
17.6% |
0.1756181 |
| 3 |
3 |
180 |
15.3% |
0.1534527 |
| 4 |
4 |
198 |
16.9% |
0.1687980 |
| 5 |
5 |
198 |
16.9% |
0.1687980 |
| 6 |
6 |
178 |
15.2% |
0.1517477 |
| Sysmiss |
|
3516 |
|
NA |
r7pad5a1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Choice between yellow/blue box
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to understand how people behave when facing financial
choices. We therefore ask that you make an anonymous decision where you
may be selected to receive money. You and another random person can
choose between a yellow or blue box.
If both choose the yellow box, you get 1,000 kroner each. If you choose
the blue and the other the yellow, you receive 1,500 kroner and the
other gets zero kroner. If both choose blue, you get 500 kroner each.
Regardless of what the other person chooses, you earn most by choosing
blue. We are selecting ten individuals who will receive money.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please take a decision.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=1. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yellow box |
122 |
57.3% |
0.57276995 |
| 2 |
Blue box |
87 |
40.8% |
0.40845070 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.9% |
0.01877934 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4476 |
|
NA |
r7pad5b1
|
Variable label:
|
Justify choice of yellow/blue box [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to understand how people behave when facing financial
choices. We therefore ask that you make an anonymous decision where you
may be selected to receive money. You and another random person can
choose between a yellow or blue box.
If both choose the yellow box, you get 1000 kroner each. If you choose
the blue and the other the yellow, you receive 1,500 kroner and the
other gets zero kroner. If both choose blue, you get 500 kroner each.
Regardless of what the other person chooses, you earn most by choosing
blue. We are selecting ten individuals who will receive money.
|
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to justify your choice before you take your decision.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=1. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7pad5b2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Choice between yellow/blue box
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please take a decision:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yellow box |
124 |
60.2% |
0.60194175 |
| 2 |
Blue box |
73 |
35.4% |
0.35436893 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
4.4% |
0.04368932 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4483 |
|
NA |
r7pad5c1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Choice between yellow/blue box: The other person chose yellow
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to understand how people behave when facing financial
choices. We therefore ask that you make an anonymous decision where you
may be selected to receive money. You and another random person can
choose between a yellow or blue box.
If both choose the yellow box, you get 1000 kroner each. If you choose
the blue and the other the yellow, you receive 1,500 kroner and the
other gets zero kroner. If both choose blue, you get 500 kroner each.
Regardless of what the other person chooses, you earn most by choosing
blue. We are selecting ten individuals who will receive money.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The other person has chosen the yellow box.
Please take a decision:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yellow box |
105 |
58.3% |
0.58333333 |
| 2 |
Blue box |
69 |
38.3% |
0.38333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
3.3% |
0.03333333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4509 |
|
NA |
r7pad5d1
|
Variable label:
|
Justify choice of yellow/blue box: The other person chose yellow [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to understand how people behave when facing financial
choices. We therefore ask that you make an anonymous decision where you
may be selected to receive money. You and another random person can
choose between a yellow or blue box.
If both choose the yellow box, you get 1000 kroner each. If you choose
the blue and the other the yellow, you receive 1,500 kroner and the
other gets zero kroner. If both choose blue, you get 500 kroner each.
Regardless of what the other person chooses, you earn most by choosing
blue. We are selecting ten individuals who will receive money.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The other person has chosen the yellow box.
We would like you to justify your choice before you take your decision.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=4. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7pad5d2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Choice between yellow/blue box: The other person chose yellow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please take a decision:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yellow box |
123 |
62.1% |
0.62121212 |
| 2 |
Blue box |
66 |
33.3% |
0.33333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
4.5% |
0.04545455 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4491 |
|
NA |
r7pad5e1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Choice between yellow/blue box: The other person chose blue
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to understand how people behave when facing financial
choices. We therefore ask that you make an anonymous decision where you
may be selected to receive money. You and another random person can
choose between a yellow or blue box.
If both choose the yellow box, you get 1000 kroner each. If you choose
the blue and the other the yellow, you receive 1,500 kroner and the
other gets zero kroner. If both choose blue, you get 500 kroner each.
Regardless of what the other person chooses, you earn most by choosing
blue. We are selecting ten individuals who will receive money.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The other person has chosen the blue box.
Please take a decision:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=5. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yellow box |
74 |
37.4% |
0.37373737 |
| 2 |
Blue box |
116 |
58.6% |
0.58585859 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
4.0% |
0.04040404 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4491 |
|
NA |
r7pad5f1
|
Variable label:
|
Justify choice of yellow/blue box: The other person chose blue [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to understand how people behave when facing financial
choices. We therefore ask that you make an anonymous decision where you
may be selected to receive money. You and another random person can
choose between a yellow or blue box.
If both choose the yellow box, you get 1,000 kroner each. If you choose
the blue and the other the yellow, you receive 1,500 kroner and the
other gets zero kroner. If both choose blue, you get 500 kroner each.
Regardless of what the other person chooses, you earn most by choosing
blue. We are selecting ten individuals who will receive money.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The other person has chosen the blue box.
We would like you to justify your choice before you take your decision.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=6. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r7pad5f2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Choice between yellow/blue box: The other person chose blue
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please take a decision:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=6. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yellow box |
70 |
39.3% |
0.39325843 |
| 2 |
Blue box |
97 |
54.5% |
0.54494382 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
6.2% |
0.06179775 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4511 |
|
NA |
r7qreview1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Questions in this survey
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested to know more about how you as a participant perceive
our surveys. All in all, how satisfied are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The questions you have answered this far in this survey?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
311 |
6.6% |
0.066325443 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2719 |
58.0% |
0.579867776 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1304 |
27.8% |
0.278097675 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
159 |
3.4% |
0.033909149 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
34 |
0.7% |
0.007251013 |
| 97 |
No answer |
162 |
3.5% |
0.034548944 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
r7qreview1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested to know more about how you as a participant perceive
our surveys. All in all, how satisfied are you with:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Being a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
664 |
14.2% |
0.14160802 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2582 |
55.1% |
0.55065046 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1020 |
21.8% |
0.21753039 |
| 4 |
Slightly satisfied |
181 |
3.9% |
0.03860098 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
58 |
1.2% |
0.01236938 |
| 97 |
No answer |
184 |
3.9% |
0.03924078 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
r7municipalSize
|
Variable label:
|
Size of municipality
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
<10 000 |
818 |
17.4% |
0.1744508 |
| 2 |
10 001 - 20 000 |
670 |
14.3% |
0.1428876 |
| 3 |
20 001 - 60 000 |
1198 |
25.5% |
0.2554916 |
| 4 |
60 000+ |
2003 |
42.7% |
0.4271700 |
r7P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
2355 |
50.2% |
0.5022393 |
| 2 |
Female |
2334 |
49.8% |
0.4977607 |
r7P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
1336 |
28.5% |
0.28492216 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
1132 |
24.1% |
0.24141608 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
216 |
4.6% |
0.04606526 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
1235 |
26.3% |
0.26338238 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
425 |
9.1% |
0.09063766 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
345 |
7.4% |
0.07357646 |
r7P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus |
583 |
12.4% |
0.124333547 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
753 |
16.1% |
0.160588612 |
| 3 |
Østfold |
240 |
5.1% |
0.051183621 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
242 |
5.2% |
0.051610151 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
131 |
2.8% |
0.027937727 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
137 |
2.9% |
0.029217317 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
243 |
5.2% |
0.051823417 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
139 |
3.0% |
0.029643847 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
141 |
3.0% |
0.030070377 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
75 |
1.6% |
0.015994882 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
409 |
8.7% |
0.087225421 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
550 |
11.7% |
0.117295799 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
82 |
1.7% |
0.017487737 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
194 |
4.1% |
0.041373427 |
| 15 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
333 |
7.1% |
0.071017274 |
| 16 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
92 |
2.0% |
0.019620388 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
185 |
3.9% |
0.039454041 |
| 18 |
Troms |
117 |
2.5% |
0.024952015 |
| 19 |
Finmark |
43 |
0.9% |
0.009170399 |
r7P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
429 |
9.1% |
0.09149072 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary eduction |
1380 |
29.4% |
0.29430582 |
| 3 |
University/university college |
2695 |
57.5% |
0.57474941 |
| 97 |
No answer |
185 |
3.9% |
0.03945404 |
r7P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
18 |
0.4% |
0.003838772 |
| 2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
33 |
0.7% |
0.007037748 |
| 3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
378 |
8.1% |
0.080614203 |
| 4 |
College certificate |
43 |
0.9% |
0.009170399 |
| 5 |
Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education
programme, one-year post admission |
600 |
12.8% |
0.127959053 |
| 6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
565 |
12.0% |
0.120494775 |
| 7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
52 |
1.1% |
0.011089785 |
| 8 |
Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical
college) |
163 |
3.5% |
0.034762209 |
| 9 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
450 |
9.6% |
0.095969290 |
| 10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
949 |
20.2% |
0.202388569 |
| 11 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
300 |
6.4% |
0.063979527 |
| 12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
345 |
7.4% |
0.073576456 |
| 13 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
553 |
11.8% |
0.117935594 |
| 14 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
98 |
2.1% |
0.020899979 |
| 15 |
None of these |
116 |
2.5% |
0.024738750 |
| 97 |
No answer |
26 |
0.6% |
0.005544892 |
r7P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
178 |
3.8% |
0.03796119 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
846 |
18.0% |
0.18042226 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
1108 |
23.6% |
0.23629772 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
957 |
20.4% |
0.20409469 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
732 |
15.6% |
0.15611004 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
560 |
11.9% |
0.11942845 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
308 |
6.6% |
0.06568565 |
r7P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
2132 |
45.5% |
0.45468117 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
2249 |
48.0% |
0.47963318 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
308 |
6.6% |
0.06568565 |
r7Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2 and P1. See documentation report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-3]
|
r7Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4_1 and P1. See documentation
report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-25]
|
r7Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4689] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]
|
