Citation
Primary investigators
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Sveinung Arnesen, Bjarte Folkestad, Endre Tvinnereim, Åsta Dyrnes Nordø,
Mikael Poul Johannesson, Erik Knudsen, Nina Serdarevic
|
Scientific team, University of Bergen and UNI Research Rokkan Centre
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public
opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway.
Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population
register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel
was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the
survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns
and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence
recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of
the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data
services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals
for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are
available at
www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage.
Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis:
Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the
age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in three
waves, wave 1, wave 3 and wave 8. In wave 1, 4.870 panel members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623 members were
recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4245 new members
were recruited.
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn
from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure
of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000
individuals.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as
well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration
is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly
outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on
behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were
acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
22 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the
register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c)
address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no
current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a online questionnaire with postal recruitment.
New panel members were recruited in multiple steps.
First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters
contained the following information: a) a description of the project, b)
the Citizen Panel’s policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the
anonymity of the participants, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the
participants’ rights to opt of the panel at any time in the future, e)
contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a
unique log-in id and the web address to the panel’s web site and g) the
estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).
In order to maximize the response rate, an incentive in the form of a
travel gift card is included in the project. The value of the gift card
is 25 000 NOK. To enter the lottery respondents were required to join
the panel and provide their email addresses. Respondents were asked to
register on the panel’s web site and log into the survey using the
unique ID-code provided in their personal letter. Information on the
lottery was included in all correspondence with respondents.
The letter was posted 06th of March 2017.
A reminder post card was sent on the 16th of March 2017 to those
respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b) had neither
completed the survey nor provided their email address. Respondents were
encouraged to join the panel, with reference to the invitation letter.
The unique log-in ID provided in the original letter was also included
in the post card.
Thereafter, respondent that had not responded to the survey received a
text message 30th of March 2017. The log-in ID was given in the text
message. Respondents without a registered phone number received a second
post card reminder. The post cards were sent out on the 28th of March
2017.
Data collection among existing panel members was conducted in parallel
with the recruitment of, and data collection among, new members. They
received an invitation to survey to their e-mail account on the 07th of
March 2017. The first and second reminders were also sent to their
e-mail account, on the 10th and 16th of March respectively.
Existing panel members with registered phone number also received a
reminder as a text message. Panel members without registered phone
number received the reminder as an email. These last reminders were sent
out on the 21st of March 2017
Wave 8 was closed 09th of April.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been
calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the
population and the total population, divided by the relation between a
given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure
returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are
underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are
overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums
are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix). When
calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent’s
geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These
attributes were included in the sample file we received from the
Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of
education is provided by the respondents when answering the
questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer
this question. Because of this, two different weights have been
calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents
with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on
demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these
cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number
of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis,
as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various
sources of bias in the net sample.
Change Log
|
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
|
v-103
|
2023-11-06
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 8
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r8Weight4
|
New
variable: Added r8Weight4
|
|
NA
|
2023-11-02
|
r8Weight4
|
Variable
documentation inserted
|
|
NA
|
2020-10-12
|
r8mi2_c
|
Corrected
english literal question
|
|
v-102
|
2020-10-12
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 8
|
|
NA
|
2020-10-08
|
r8mi2_c
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-28
|
r8B8_1
- r8B8_21
|
Warning
added: variables are based on variables containing errors (r7k34_1 -
r7k34_21)
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_2
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_3
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_4
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_5
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_6
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_7
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_8
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_9
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_10
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_11
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_12
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_13
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_14
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_15
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_16
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_17
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_18
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_19
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_20
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-08-21
|
r8B8_21
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2020-07-01
|
r8k26
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised
release of round 8
|
|
NA
|
2020-06-11
|
r8frfrivsonb_1
|
Variable
documentation updated
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-20
|
r8baerg4
|
Added english variable documentation.
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-19
|
r8baerg3
|
Added english variable documentation.
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-18
|
r8baerg2
|
Added english variable documentation.
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-17
|
r8baerg1
|
Added english variable documentation.
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-16
|
r8baerg_background2
|
Added english variable documentation.
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-15
|
r8baerg_background1_3
|
Added english variable documentation.
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-14
|
r8baerg_background1_2
|
Added english variable documentation.
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-13
|
r8baerg_background1_1
|
Added english variable documentation.
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r8tilfreds3
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”), 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
and 6 (“Do not know / no opinion”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”), 5 (“Not
satisfied at all”) and 6 (“Don’t know / no opinion)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r8tilfreds4
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”), 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
and 6 (“Do not know / no opinion”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”), 5 (“Not
satisfied at all”) and 6 (“Don’t know / no opinion)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r8tilfreds4_1a
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”), 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
and 6 (“Do not know / no opinion”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”), 5 (“Not
satisfied at all”) and 6 (“Don’t know / no opinion)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r8tilfreds4_1b
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”), 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
and 6 (“Do not know / no opinion”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”), 5 (“Not
satisfied at all”) and 6 (“Don’t know / no opinion)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r8tilfreds4_2a
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”), 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
and 6 (“Do not know / no opinion”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”), 5 (“Not
satisfied at all”) and 6 (“Don’t know / no opinion)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r8tilfreds4_2b
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”), 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
and 6 (“Do not know / no opinion”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”), 5 (“Not
satisfied at all”) and 6 (“Don’t know / no opinion)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r8qreview1
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”), 5 (“Very dissatisfied”)
and 6 (“Do not know / no opinion”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”), 5 (“Not
satisfied at all”) and 6 (“Don’t know / no opinion)
|
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r8baerg_background1
|
Added english variable documentation.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-16
|
r8k27_kodet
|
New variable based on r8k27.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-16
|
r8k33_9_other_kodet
|
New variable based on R8k33_9_other.
|
|
NA
|
2019-01-16
|
r8k204_10_other_kodet
|
New variable based on R8k204_10_other.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r8p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r8p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-20
|
r8p3
|
Updated the value of 1 respondent.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-13
|
r8_weight_2
|
Corrected values of 410 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r8p4_1
|
Corrected values of 410 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r8p4_2
|
Corrected values of 2254 respondents.
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-01
|
r8pad2
|
Recoded variables from string to numerics.
|
|
NA
|
2017-08-01
|
r8pad3
|
Recoded variables from string to numerics.
|
|
v-100
|
2017-05-18
|
NA
|
Initial
release of round 8
|
|
NA
|
2017-05-05
|
r8p4_1
|
Added new variables.
|
|
NA
|
2017-05-05
|
r8p4_2
|
Added new variables.
|
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 8 - v-103-O.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
|
# Cases
|
8612
|
|
# Variables
|
575
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8interview_start
|
Variable label:
|
Date of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8interview_end
|
Variable label:
|
Date of when the respondentn completed the questionnaire.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire.
Excel-format.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8u
|
Variable label:
|
Thematical sub-group from wave 1-7. New thematical sub-groups are
defined in wave 8. These are defined in variable R8v.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Thematical sub-group from wave 1-7. New thematical sub-groups are
defined in wave 8. These are defined in variable R8v. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4435] [Invalid:4177]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
U1 |
1119 |
25.2% |
0.2523112 |
| 2 |
U2 |
1110 |
25.0% |
0.2502818 |
| 3 |
U3 |
1077 |
24.3% |
0.2428410 |
| 4 |
U4 |
1129 |
25.5% |
0.2545660 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4177 |
|
NA |
r8rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
The wave the respondent was recruited.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rekruttert runde 1 |
2058 |
23.9% |
0.2389689 |
| 3 |
Rekruttert runde 3 |
2377 |
27.6% |
0.2760102 |
| 8 |
Rekruttert runde 8 |
4177 |
48.5% |
0.4850209 |
r8frflykt_filter
|
Variable label:
|
Background variabel for R8FRflykt. Variable equals 1 if respondent is
asked r6friiv1_1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variabel for R8FRflykt.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Is not asked r6friiv1_1 tidligere |
7722 |
89.7% |
0.8966558 |
| 1 |
Is asked r6friiv1_1 tidligere |
890 |
10.3% |
0.1033442 |
r8km4_b_filter
|
Variable label:
|
Background variabel for R8KM4b. Variable equals 1 if respondent is asked
r7dvh_1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variabel for R8KM4b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Is not asked r7dvh_1 tidligere |
5190 |
60.3% |
0.6026475 |
| 1 |
Is asked r7dvh_1 tidligere |
3422 |
39.7% |
0.3973525 |
r8km5_filter
|
Variable label:
|
Background variabel for R8KM5. Variable equals 1 if respondent is asked
R7KM5.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variabel for R8KM5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Is not asked R7KM5 earlier |
7696 |
89.4% |
0.8936368 |
| 1 |
Is asked R7KM5 earlier |
916 |
10.6% |
0.1063632 |
r8browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
Browertype used by respondent to complete the questionnaire
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
Browser version used by respondent to complete the questionnaire
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8mobil
|
Variable label:
|
Determines if the respondents uses smart phone to answer the
questionnaire
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Does not use smart phone |
6699 |
77.8% |
0.7778681 |
| 1 |
Does use smart phone |
1913 |
22.2% |
0.2221319 |
r8opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device used to complete the
questionnaire
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
Determines respondents device type used to complete the questionnaire
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
6849 |
79.5% |
0.795285648 |
| 2 |
Touch |
1744 |
20.3% |
0.202508128 |
| 3 |
Generic |
19 |
0.2% |
0.002206224 |
r8advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features
that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking,
images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI
Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop
ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8v
|
Variable label:
|
[The questionnaire is roughly divided into four groups. The respondents
only answer questions connected to one of these four groups. This
variable randomizes all respondents (new and old) into one of these four
tematic groups. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[The questionnaire is roughly divided into four groups. The respondents
only answer questions connected to one of these four groups. This
variable randomizes all respondents (new and old) into one of these four
tematic groups. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
v1 |
2226 |
25.8% |
0.2584765 |
| 2 |
v2 |
2133 |
24.8% |
0.2476777 |
| 3 |
v3 |
2114 |
24.5% |
0.2454714 |
| 4 |
v4 |
2139 |
24.8% |
0.2483744 |
r8k1
|
Variable label:
|
Interest in politics
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very interested |
1054 |
12.2% |
0.122387366 |
| 2 |
Interested |
3849 |
44.7% |
0.446934510 |
| 3 |
Somewhat interested |
2795 |
32.5% |
0.324547144 |
| 4 |
Not very interested |
747 |
8.7% |
0.086739433 |
| 5 |
Not interested at all |
149 |
1.7% |
0.017301440 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
0.2% |
0.002090107 |
r8k204
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party at parliamentary election tomorrow
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
354 |
4.1% |
0.04110543 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1916 |
22.2% |
0.22248026 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
794 |
9.2% |
0.09219693 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
377 |
4.4% |
0.04377613 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
470 |
5.5% |
0.05457501 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
844 |
9.8% |
0.09800279 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
342 |
4.0% |
0.03971203 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2464 |
28.6% |
0.28611240 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
245 |
2.8% |
0.02844868 |
| 10 |
Other: |
211 |
2.5% |
0.02450070 |
| 11 |
Would not vote |
274 |
3.2% |
0.03181607 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
233 |
2.7% |
0.02705527 |
| 97 |
No answer |
88 |
1.0% |
0.01021830 |
r8k204_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party at parliamentary election tomorrow, other
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8k204_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Ville stemt på følgende parti hvis stortingsvalg i morgen [kodet]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election
tomorrow?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[This variable contains the values of r8k204 plus coded values of
r8k204_10_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
354 |
4.1% |
0.04110543 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
1916 |
22.2% |
0.22248026 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
794 |
9.2% |
0.09219693 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
377 |
4.4% |
0.04377613 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
470 |
5.5% |
0.05457501 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
844 |
9.8% |
0.09800279 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
342 |
4.0% |
0.03971203 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
2464 |
28.6% |
0.28611240 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
245 |
2.8% |
0.02844868 |
| 10 |
Other: |
210 |
2.4% |
0.02438458 |
| 11 |
Would not vote |
274 |
3.2% |
0.03181607 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
234 |
2.7% |
0.02717139 |
| 97 |
No answer |
88 |
1.0% |
0.01021830 |
r8k8_1
|
Variable label:
|
Self-placement on political scale
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right
wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are politically on
the far left, and 10 represents those who are politically on the far
right.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 Left |
128 |
1.5% |
0.01486298 |
| 2 |
1 |
208 |
2.4% |
0.02415235 |
| 3 |
2 |
632 |
7.3% |
0.07338597 |
| 4 |
3 |
1226 |
14.2% |
0.14235950 |
| 5 |
4 |
1202 |
14.0% |
0.13957269 |
| 6 |
5 |
1677 |
19.5% |
0.19472829 |
| 7 |
6 |
1098 |
12.7% |
0.12749652 |
| 8 |
7 |
1178 |
13.7% |
0.13678588 |
| 9 |
8 |
747 |
8.7% |
0.08673943 |
| 10 |
9 |
219 |
2.5% |
0.02542963 |
| 11 |
10 Right |
174 |
2.0% |
0.02020437 |
| 97 |
No answer |
123 |
1.4% |
0.01428240 |
r8km1
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the words “global warming” [Data withheld
for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the words “global warming”?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all
types of answers, a couple of sentences would be nice, or just a few
words if that is better for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 OR v=3 and u=2.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8k13
|
Variable label:
|
How much the political system in Norway allows you to have a say in what
the government does
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like
you to have a say in what the government does?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
100 |
1.2% |
0.01161170 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
1156 |
13.4% |
0.13423131 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
4118 |
47.8% |
0.47817000 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
2602 |
30.2% |
0.30213655 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
406 |
4.7% |
0.04714352 |
| 97 |
No answer |
230 |
2.7% |
0.02670692 |
r8k14
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Sometimes politics is so complicated that I do not understand
what it’s about
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not
understand what it’s about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
306 |
3.6% |
0.03553182 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1050 |
12.2% |
0.12192290 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2735 |
31.8% |
0.31758012 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1047 |
12.2% |
0.12157455 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1281 |
14.9% |
0.14874594 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1555 |
18.1% |
0.18056201 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
380 |
4.4% |
0.04412448 |
| 97 |
No answer |
258 |
3.0% |
0.02995820 |
r8k10
|
Variable label:
|
Perception of the economic situation in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
1271 |
14.8% |
0.14758477 |
| 2 |
Good |
4428 |
51.4% |
0.51416628 |
| 3 |
Quite good |
1437 |
16.7% |
0.16686020 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
532 |
6.2% |
0.06177427 |
| 5 |
Quite bad |
358 |
4.2% |
0.04156990 |
| 6 |
Bad |
98 |
1.1% |
0.01137947 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
27 |
0.3% |
0.00313516 |
| 97 |
No answer |
461 |
5.4% |
0.05352996 |
r8tilfreds3
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: The government in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
323 |
3.8% |
0.03750581 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
2346 |
27.2% |
0.27241059 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2740 |
31.8% |
0.31816071 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
2296 |
26.7% |
0.26660474 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
740 |
8.6% |
0.08592661 |
| 97 |
No answer |
167 |
1.9% |
0.01939155 |
r8tilfreds4
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: How democracy works in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
962 |
11.2% |
0.11170460 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
4180 |
48.5% |
0.48536925 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2058 |
23.9% |
0.23896888 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
744 |
8.6% |
0.08639108 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
160 |
1.9% |
0.01857873 |
| 97 |
No answer |
508 |
5.9% |
0.05898746 |
r8k15
|
Variable label:
|
Can most people be trusted?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you
think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Cannot be careful enough |
219 |
2.5% |
0.025429633 |
| 2 |
2 |
134 |
1.6% |
0.015559684 |
| 3 |
3 |
445 |
5.2% |
0.051672085 |
| 4 |
4 |
580 |
6.7% |
0.067347887 |
| 5 |
5 |
980 |
11.4% |
0.113794705 |
| 6 |
6 |
791 |
9.2% |
0.091848583 |
| 7 |
7 |
1737 |
20.2% |
0.201695309 |
| 8 |
8 |
2117 |
24.6% |
0.245819786 |
| 9 |
9 |
805 |
9.3% |
0.093474222 |
| 10 |
10 - Most people can be trusted |
751 |
8.7% |
0.087203902 |
| 97 |
No answer |
53 |
0.6% |
0.006154203 |
r8straff
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Violent crimes should be punished more severely
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Violent crimes should be punished far more severely than at present.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
2097 |
24.3% |
0.243497445 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2700 |
31.4% |
0.313516024 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1914 |
22.2% |
0.222248026 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1089 |
12.6% |
0.126451463 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
317 |
3.7% |
0.036809104 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
244 |
2.8% |
0.028332559 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
55 |
0.6% |
0.006386438 |
| 97 |
No answer |
196 |
2.3% |
0.022758941 |
r8vekst
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development
of industry, even if it conflicts with environmental interests
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of
industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
333 |
3.9% |
0.03866698 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1005 |
11.7% |
0.11669763 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1894 |
22.0% |
0.21992569 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1035 |
12.0% |
0.12018114 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1817 |
21.1% |
0.21098467 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1673 |
19.4% |
0.19426382 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
683 |
7.9% |
0.07930794 |
| 97 |
No answer |
172 |
2.0% |
0.01997213 |
r8storstat
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Government should contribute to reducing income differences
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government should contribute to reducing income differences in
society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1612 |
18.7% |
0.18718068 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2711 |
31.5% |
0.31479331 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2265 |
26.3% |
0.26300511 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
784 |
9.1% |
0.09103576 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
595 |
6.9% |
0.06908964 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
331 |
3.8% |
0.03843474 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
100 |
1.2% |
0.01161170 |
| 97 |
No answer |
214 |
2.5% |
0.02484905 |
r8egeninnsats
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: People should work hard through own efforts without counting
on help
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
People should work hard to get ahead through their own efforts without
counting on help from others.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
512 |
5.9% |
0.05945193 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1972 |
22.9% |
0.22898281 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
2947 |
34.2% |
0.34219693 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1090 |
12.7% |
0.12656758 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1201 |
13.9% |
0.13945657 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
603 |
7.0% |
0.07001858 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
159 |
1.8% |
0.01846261 |
| 97 |
No answer |
128 |
1.5% |
0.01486298 |
r8parlikhet
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
3742 |
43.5% |
0.43450999 |
| 2 |
Agree |
2520 |
29.3% |
0.29261496 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
749 |
8.7% |
0.08697167 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
535 |
6.2% |
0.06212262 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
357 |
4.1% |
0.04145379 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
326 |
3.8% |
0.03785416 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
219 |
2.5% |
0.02542963 |
| 97 |
No answer |
164 |
1.9% |
0.01904320 |
r8euint
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: European integration through the EU gone too far
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
European integration through the EU has gone too far.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1197 |
13.9% |
0.13899210 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1695 |
19.7% |
0.19681839 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1869 |
21.7% |
0.21702276 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1914 |
22.2% |
0.22224803 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
740 |
8.6% |
0.08592661 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
792 |
9.2% |
0.09196470 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
177 |
2.1% |
0.02055272 |
| 97 |
No answer |
228 |
2.6% |
0.02647469 |
r8innvandring
|
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Immigration a threat to Norwegian culture
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigration poses a serious threat to Norwegian culture.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
851 |
9.9% |
0.09881561 |
| 2 |
Agree |
1059 |
12.3% |
0.12296795 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
1846 |
21.4% |
0.21435207 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
894 |
10.4% |
0.10380864 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1105 |
12.8% |
0.12830934 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
1797 |
20.9% |
0.20866233 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
896 |
10.4% |
0.10404087 |
| 97 |
No answer |
164 |
1.9% |
0.01904320 |
r8bekym_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly chooses if R8BEKYM_comment should be asked to the respondent.
]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly chooses if R8BEKYM_comment should be asked to the respondent.
]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Do not get R8BEKYM_comment. |
4385 |
50.9% |
0.5091732 |
| 1 |
Get R8BEKYM_comment |
4227 |
49.1% |
0.4908268 |
r8bekym
|
Variable label:
|
Concern about climate change
|
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very concerned |
1327 |
15.4% |
0.154087320 |
| 2 |
Concerned |
2948 |
34.2% |
0.342313052 |
| 3 |
Somewhat concerned |
2820 |
32.7% |
0.327450070 |
| 4 |
Not particularly concerned |
1215 |
14.1% |
0.141082211 |
| 5 |
Not at all concerned |
256 |
3.0% |
0.029725964 |
| 97 |
No answer |
46 |
0.5% |
0.005341384 |
r8bekym_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Comments to concern about climate change [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments, please write them here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8BEKYM_ran=1. Asked on the same page as R8BEKYM.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8fr1_friv_0
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Art and culture, band and choir
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
280 |
12.6% |
0.125786164 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1941 |
87.2% |
0.871967655 |
r8fr1_friv_1
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Athletics and sport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Athletics and sport |
435 |
19.5% |
0.195417790 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1786 |
80.2% |
0.802336029 |
r8fr1_friv_2
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
326 |
14.6% |
0.146451033 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1895 |
85.1% |
0.851302785 |
r8fr1_friv_3
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Education, training and research
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Education, training and research |
183 |
8.2% |
0.082210243 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2038 |
91.6% |
0.915543576 |
r8fr1_friv_4
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Health, nursing and rescue work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
115 |
5.2% |
0.051662174 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2106 |
94.6% |
0.946091644 |
r8fr1_friv_5
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Social services and substance abuse care
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
77 |
3.5% |
0.034591195 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2144 |
96.3% |
0.963162624 |
r8fr1_friv_6
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
100 |
4.5% |
0.044923630 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2121 |
95.3% |
0.952830189 |
r8fr1_friv_7
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Residents’ associations, community associations and local
neighbourhood
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
347 |
15.6% |
0.155884996 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1874 |
84.2% |
0.841868823 |
r8fr1_friv_8
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
204 |
9.2% |
0.091644205 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2017 |
90.6% |
0.906109614 |
r8fr1_friv_9
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Rights, support and advocacy work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
37 |
1.7% |
0.016621743 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2184 |
98.1% |
0.981132075 |
r8fr1_friv_10
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Political parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Political parties |
71 |
3.2% |
0.031895777 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2150 |
96.6% |
0.965858041 |
r8fr1_friv_11
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: International exchange, emergency help, assistance and
human rights work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
81 |
3.6% |
0.036388140 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2140 |
96.1% |
0.961365678 |
r8fr1_friv_12
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
130 |
5.8% |
0.058400719 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2091 |
93.9% |
0.939353100 |
r8fr1_friv_13
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
154 |
6.9% |
0.069182390 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2067 |
92.9% |
0.928571429 |
r8fr1_friv_14
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Immigrant organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Immigrant organisations |
28 |
1.3% |
0.012578616 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2193 |
98.5% |
0.985175202 |
r8fr1_friv_15
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Other, specify
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify |
101 |
4.5% |
0.045372866 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2120 |
95.2% |
0.952380952 |
r8fr1_friv_15_other
|
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8fr1_friv_16
|
Variable label:
|
No, not volunteering
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work
for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
828 |
37.2% |
0.371967655 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002246181 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1393 |
62.6% |
0.625786164 |
r8fr1_friv_utfortarbeid
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable. Variabel =1 if respondent has carried out
volunteer work (R8FR1_friv).]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Variabel =1 if respondent has carried out
volunteer work (R8FR1_friv).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2220] [Invalid:6392]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Ikke utført frivillig arbeid siste 12 mnd |
847 |
38.2% |
0.3815315 |
| 1 |
Utført frivillig arbeid siste 12 mnd |
1373 |
61.8% |
0.6184685 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6392 |
|
NA |
r8frtidaar
|
Variable label:
|
Time spent on voluntary work an average week
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much time do you ordinarily spend on voluntary work in an average
week?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FR1_friv_16!=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than half an hour |
499 |
35.7% |
0.35693848 |
| 2 |
Between half an hour and an hour |
227 |
16.2% |
0.16237482 |
| 3 |
1 to 2 hours |
280 |
20.0% |
0.20028612 |
| 4 |
2 to 5 hours |
190 |
13.6% |
0.13590844 |
| 5 |
More than five hours |
92 |
6.6% |
0.06580830 |
| 6 |
Not sure |
91 |
6.5% |
0.06509299 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
1.4% |
0.01359084 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7214 |
|
NA |
r8frfrivuker
|
Variable label:
|
Has during the past 4 weeks carried out voluntary work
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you during the past 4 weeks carried out voluntary work?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FR1_friv_16!=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
901 |
64.4% |
0.64449213 |
| 2 |
No |
463 |
33.1% |
0.33118741 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
2.4% |
0.02432046 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7214 |
|
NA |
r8frfrivson
|
Variable label:
|
Has during the past 4 weeks carried out voluntary work on Sundays
|
|
Literal question:
|
Have you during the past 4 weeks carried out voluntary work on Sundays?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRfrivuker=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
378 |
42.0% |
0.41953385 |
| 2 |
No |
472 |
52.4% |
0.52386238 |
| 97 |
No answer |
51 |
5.7% |
0.05660377 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7711 |
|
NA |
r8frfrivsona
|
Variable label:
|
How many Sundays you have carried out voluntary work during the last 4
weeks
|
|
Literal question:
|
On how many Sundays have you carried out voluntary work during the last
4 weeks?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRfrivson=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
212 |
56.1% |
0.56084656 |
| 2 |
2 |
116 |
30.7% |
0.30687831 |
| 3 |
3 |
21 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
| 4 |
4 |
19 |
5.0% |
0.05026455 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.6% |
0.02645503 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
r8frfrivsonb_1
|
Variable label:
|
Hours of voluntary work carried out on an average Sunday during the last
4 weeks [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Over the last 4 weeks, about how many hours of voluntary work have you
carried out on an average Sunday?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRfrivson=1.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-24]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
41 |
10.8% |
0.108465608 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
5 |
1.3% |
0.013227513 |
| 1 |
|
76 |
20.1% |
0.201058201 |
| 2 |
|
113 |
29.9% |
0.298941799 |
| 3 |
|
59 |
15.6% |
0.156084656 |
| 4 |
|
35 |
9.3% |
0.092592593 |
| 5 |
|
21 |
5.6% |
0.055555556 |
| 6 |
|
12 |
3.2% |
0.031746032 |
| 7 |
|
3 |
0.8% |
0.007936508 |
| 8 |
|
8 |
2.1% |
0.021164021 |
| 9 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.002645503 |
| 11 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.002645503 |
| 12 |
|
2 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
| 24 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.002645503 |
r8frutsagn_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement volunteering: Get involved in initiatives, but seldom in
regular meetings
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below about volunteering. To what extent do you
agree or disagree with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I will gladly get involved in specific initiatives started up by the
organisation(s), but I am seldom able to participate in regular meetings
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FR1_friv_16!=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
61 |
4.4% |
0.04363376 |
| 2 |
Agree |
250 |
17.9% |
0.17882690 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
290 |
20.7% |
0.20743920 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
232 |
16.6% |
0.16595136 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
171 |
12.2% |
0.12231760 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
251 |
18.0% |
0.17954220 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
82 |
5.9% |
0.05865522 |
| 97 |
No answer |
61 |
4.4% |
0.04363376 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7214 |
|
NA |
r8frutsagn_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement volunteering: More content with myself
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below about volunteering. To what extent do you
agree or disagree with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
As a volunteer I am more content with myself
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FR1_friv_16!=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
121 |
8.7% |
0.08655222 |
| 2 |
Agree |
474 |
33.9% |
0.33905579 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
342 |
24.5% |
0.24463519 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
285 |
20.4% |
0.20386266 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
37 |
2.6% |
0.02646638 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
44 |
3.1% |
0.03147353 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
24 |
1.7% |
0.01716738 |
| 97 |
No answer |
71 |
5.1% |
0.05078684 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7214 |
|
NA |
r8frutsagn_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement volunteering: Feel important
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below about volunteering. To what extent do you
agree or disagree with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel important when I am working as a volunteer
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FR1_friv_16!=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
115 |
8.2% |
0.08226037 |
| 2 |
Agree |
410 |
29.3% |
0.29327611 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
307 |
22.0% |
0.21959943 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
341 |
24.4% |
0.24391989 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
43 |
3.1% |
0.03075823 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
69 |
4.9% |
0.04935622 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
35 |
2.5% |
0.02503577 |
| 97 |
No answer |
78 |
5.6% |
0.05579399 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7214 |
|
NA |
r8fr1medl_0
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Arts and culture, bands and choirs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Arts and culture, bands and choirs
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_0=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Arts and culture, bands and choirs |
172 |
61.4% |
0.6142857 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8332 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
108 |
38.6% |
0.3857143 |
r8fr1medl_1
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Athletics and sport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_1=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Athletics and sport |
307 |
70.6% |
0.7057471 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8177 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
128 |
29.4% |
0.2942529 |
r8fr1medl_2
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Hobbies, leisure activities, outdoor
activities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, leisure activities, outdoor activities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_2=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hobbies, leisure activities, outdoor activities |
174 |
53.4% |
0.5337423 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8286 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
152 |
46.6% |
0.4662577 |
r8fr1medl_3
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Education, training and research
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_3=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Education, training and research |
71 |
38.8% |
0.387978142 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005464481 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8429 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
111 |
60.7% |
0.606557377 |
r8fr1medl_4
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Health, care and rescue work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health, care and rescue work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_4=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health, care and rescue work |
48 |
41.7% |
0.4173913 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8497 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
67 |
58.3% |
0.5826087 |
r8fr1medl_5
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Social services and substance abuse
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social services and substance abuse |
32 |
41.6% |
0.4155844 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8535 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
45 |
58.4% |
0.5844156 |
r8fr1medl_6
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Nature, environment and animal protection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environment and animal protection
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_6=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nature, environment and animal protection |
52 |
52.0% |
0.52 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8512 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
48 |
48.0% |
0.48 |
r8fr1medl_7
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Neighbourhood associations, special
interest groups and local community
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Neighbourhood associations, special interest groups and local community
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_7=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Neighbourhood associations, special interest groups and local community |
256 |
73.8% |
0.7377522 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8265 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
91 |
26.2% |
0.2622478 |
r8fr1medl_8
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Housing cooperatives and housing
associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housing cooperatives and housing associations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_8=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housing cooperatives and housing associations |
156 |
76.5% |
0.7647059 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8408 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
48 |
23.5% |
0.2352941 |
r8fr1medl_9
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Civil liberties, support work and
advocacy work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Civil liberties, support work and advocacy work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_9=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Civil liberties, support work and advocacy work |
22 |
59.5% |
0.5945946 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8575 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
15 |
40.5% |
0.4054054 |
r8fr1medl_10
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Political parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_10=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Political parties |
68 |
95.8% |
0.95774648 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8541 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
3 |
4.2% |
0.04225352 |
r8fr1medl_11
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: International exchanges, emergency
relief, aid and human rights work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
International exchanges, emergency relief, aid and human rights work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_11=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
International exchanges, emergency relief, aid and human rights work |
52 |
64.2% |
0.64197531 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8531 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
28 |
34.6% |
0.34567901 |
r8fr1medl_12
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Professional associations, industry
associations and trade unions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Professional associations, industry associations and trade unions
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_12=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Professional associations, industry associations and trade unions |
108 |
83.1% |
0.8307692 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8482 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
22 |
16.9% |
0.1692308 |
r8fr1medl_13
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Religion and spirituality including the
Norwegian church
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and spirituality including the Norwegian church
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_13=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Religion and spirituality including the Norwegian church |
136 |
88.3% |
0.8831169 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8458 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
18 |
11.7% |
0.1168831 |
r8fr1medl_14
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: Immigrant organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_14=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Immigrant organisations |
7 |
25.0% |
0.25 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8584 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
21 |
75.0% |
0.75 |
r8fr1medl_15
|
Variable label:
|
Member of organisation within: [Other]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you are a member of one or more
organizations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other [^f('R8FR1_friv_15_other')^}]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_15=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Other] |
60 |
59.4% |
0.5940594 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8511 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
41 |
40.6% |
0.4059406 |
r8frtidaarorg
|
Variable label:
|
Time spent participating in member activities in a voluntary
organisation the last year
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the last year as a whole, roughly how much time did
you spend participating in member activities in a voluntary
organisation?
|
|
Post-question:
|
E.g. involved in training, exercises, membership meetings, social
gatherings or similar
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FR1medl is answered.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Less than half an hour |
250 |
17.9% |
0.17882690 |
| 2 |
Between half an hour and one hour |
189 |
13.5% |
0.13519313 |
| 3 |
1 to 2 hours |
251 |
18.0% |
0.17954220 |
| 4 |
2 to 5 hours |
214 |
15.3% |
0.15307582 |
| 5 |
More than 5 hours |
129 |
9.2% |
0.09227468 |
| 6 |
Not sure |
80 |
5.7% |
0.05722461 |
| 97 |
No answer |
285 |
20.4% |
0.20386266 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7214 |
|
NA |
r8fr1verv_0
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Arts and culture, bands and choirs
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Arts and culture, bands and choirs
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_0=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Arts and culture, bands and choirs |
100 |
35.7% |
0.3571429 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8332 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
180 |
64.3% |
0.6428571 |
r8fr1verv_1
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Athletics and sport
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_1=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Athletics and sport |
145 |
33.3% |
0.333333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002298851 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8177 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
289 |
66.4% |
0.664367816 |
r8fr1verv_2
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Hobbies, leisure activities, outdoor
activities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, leisure activities, outdoor activities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_2=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hobbies, leisure activities, outdoor activities |
77 |
23.6% |
0.2361963 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8286 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
249 |
76.4% |
0.7638037 |
r8fr1verv_3
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Education, training and research
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_3=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Education, training and research |
37 |
20.2% |
0.202185792 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005464481 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8429 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
145 |
79.2% |
0.792349727 |
r8fr1verv_4
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Health, care and rescue work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health, care and rescue work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_4=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health, care and rescue work |
18 |
15.7% |
0.1565217 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8497 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
97 |
84.3% |
0.8434783 |
r8fr1verv_5
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Social services and substance abuse
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social services and substance abuse |
18 |
23.4% |
0.2337662 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8535 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
59 |
76.6% |
0.7662338 |
r8fr1verv_6
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Nature, environment and animal protection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environment and animal protection
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_6=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nature, environment and animal protection |
12 |
12.0% |
0.12 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8512 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
88 |
88.0% |
0.88 |
r8fr1verv_7
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Neighbourhood associations, special interest
groups and local community
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Neighbourhood associations, special interest groups and local community
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_7=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Neighbourhood associations, special interest groups and local community |
128 |
36.9% |
0.3688761 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8265 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
219 |
63.1% |
0.6311239 |
r8fr1verv_8
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Housing cooperatives and housing associations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housing cooperatives and housing associations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_8=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housing cooperatives and housing associations |
87 |
42.6% |
0.4264706 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8408 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
117 |
57.4% |
0.5735294 |
r8fr1verv_9
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Civil liberties, support work and advocacy
work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Civil liberties, support work and advocacy work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_9=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Civil liberties, support work and advocacy work |
13 |
35.1% |
0.3513514 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8575 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
24 |
64.9% |
0.6486486 |
r8fr1verv_10
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Political parties
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_10=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Political parties |
44 |
62.0% |
0.6197183 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8541 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
27 |
38.0% |
0.3802817 |
r8fr1verv_11
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: International exchanges, emergency relief, aid
and human rights work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
International exchanges, emergency relief, aid and human rights work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_11=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
International exchanges, emergency relief, aid and human rights work |
25 |
30.9% |
0.30864198 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8531 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
55 |
67.9% |
0.67901235 |
r8fr1verv_12
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Professional associations, industry
associations and trade unions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Professional associations, industry associations and trade unions
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_12=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Professional associations, industry associations and trade unions |
77 |
59.2% |
0.5923077 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8482 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
53 |
40.8% |
0.4076923 |
r8fr1verv_13
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Religion and spirituality including the
Norwegian church
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and spirituality including the Norwegian church
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_13=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Religion and spirituality including the Norwegian church |
65 |
42.2% |
0.4220779 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8458 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
89 |
57.8% |
0.5779221 |
r8fr1verv_14
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: Immigrant organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_14=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Immigrant organisations |
5 |
17.9% |
0.1785714 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8584 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
23 |
82.1% |
0.8214286 |
r8fr1verv_15
|
Variable label:
|
Position of trust within: [Other]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have previously answered that you have carried out voluntary work in
the following area(s). Tick if you have a position of trust in one or
more organisations within [this area/these areas].
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other [^f('R8FR1_friv_15_other')^]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1, R8FR1_friv_utfortArbeid=1 and R8FR1_friv_15=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[Other] |
34 |
33.7% |
0.3366337 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8511 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
67 |
66.3% |
0.6633663 |
r8frflykt_1
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution refugee situation: Donation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last years. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Donation (e.g. money/clothing/equipment)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_filter=0.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Donation (e.g. money/clothing/equipment) |
605 |
30.5% |
0.305093293 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.5% |
0.004538578 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6629 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1369 |
69.0% |
0.690368129 |
r8frflykt_2
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution refugee situation: Physical contribution
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last years. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Physical contribution (e.g. given out food/clothing/equipment directly
to refugees)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_filter=0.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Physical contribution (e.g. given out food/clothing/equipment directly to
refugees) |
60 |
3.0% |
0.030257186 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.5% |
0.004538578 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6629 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1914 |
96.5% |
0.965204236 |
r8frflykt_3
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution refugee situation: Administrative contribution
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last years. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Administrative contribution (e.g. coordinated action/information work)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_filter=0.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Administrative contribution (e.g. coordinated action/information work) |
37 |
1.9% |
0.018658598 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.5% |
0.004538578 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6629 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1937 |
97.7% |
0.976802824 |
r8frflykt_4
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution refugee situation: Other form of contribution
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last years. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other form of contribution; specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_filter=0.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other form of contribution; specify: |
107 |
5.4% |
0.053958649 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.5% |
0.004538578 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6629 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1867 |
94.2% |
0.941502774 |
r8frflykt_4_other
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution refugee situation: Other form of contribution [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last years. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other form of contribution; specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_filter=0.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8frflykt_5
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution refugee situation: No, none of these
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last years. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
No, none of these
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_filter=0.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No, none of these |
1236 |
62.3% |
0.623298033 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.5% |
0.004538578 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6629 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
738 |
37.2% |
0.372163389 |
r8frflykt1_1
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Gave money
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gave money
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gave money |
440 |
61.9% |
0.6188467 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
271 |
38.1% |
0.3811533 |
r8frflykt1_2
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Gave clothing/equipment/food
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gave clothing/equipment/food
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gave clothing/equipment/food |
376 |
52.9% |
0.5288326 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
335 |
47.1% |
0.4711674 |
r8frflykt1_3
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Gave out clothing/equipment/food directly to
refugees
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gave out clothing/equipment/food directly to refugees
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gave out clothing/equipment/food directly to refugees |
30 |
4.2% |
0.04219409 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
681 |
95.8% |
0.95780591 |
r8frflykt1_4
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Acted as a refugee guide
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Acted as a refugee guide
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Acted as a refugee guide |
10 |
1.4% |
0.0140647 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
701 |
98.6% |
0.9859353 |
r8frflykt1_5
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Acted as visiting friend/social contact
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Acted as visiting friend/social contact
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Acted as visiting friend/social contact |
45 |
6.3% |
0.06329114 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
666 |
93.7% |
0.93670886 |
r8frflykt1_6
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Helped with homework/lessons
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Helped with homework/lessons
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Helped with homework/lessons |
22 |
3.1% |
0.03094233 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
689 |
96.9% |
0.96905767 |
r8frflykt1_7
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Organised gatherings
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Organised gatherings
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Organised gatherings |
24 |
3.4% |
0.03375527 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
687 |
96.6% |
0.96624473 |
r8frflykt1_8
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Helped with teaching Norwegian/other teaching
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Helped with teaching Norwegian/other teaching
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Helped with teaching Norwegian/other teaching |
37 |
5.2% |
0.05203938 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
674 |
94.8% |
0.94796062 |
r8frflykt1_9
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Helped with organisation and activities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Helped with organisation and activities (e.g. at asylum seekers’ centre)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Helped with organisation and activities (e.g. at asylum seekers’ centre) |
24 |
3.4% |
0.03375527 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
687 |
96.6% |
0.96624473 |
r8frflykt1_10
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Housed refugees at home
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housed refugees at home
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housed refugees at home |
4 |
0.6% |
0.005625879 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
707 |
99.4% |
0.994374121 |
r8frflykt1_11
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Administered/coordinated volunteers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Administered/coordinated volunteers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Administered/coordinated volunteers |
18 |
2.5% |
0.02531646 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
693 |
97.5% |
0.97468354 |
r8frflykt1_12
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Information work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Information work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Information work |
28 |
3.9% |
0.03938115 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
683 |
96.1% |
0.96061885 |
r8frflykt1_13
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Editing/moderating websites
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Editing/moderating websites (inc. social media)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Editing/moderating websites (inc. social media) |
4 |
0.6% |
0.005625879 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
707 |
99.4% |
0.994374121 |
r8frflykt1_14
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
28 |
3.9% |
0.03938115 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
683 |
96.1% |
0.96061885 |
r8frflykt1_14_other
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Other [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8frflykt2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Traditional voluntary
organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
A traditional voluntary organisation (e.g. Red Cross, Norwegian People’s
Aid)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A traditional voluntary organisation (e.g. Red Cross, Norwegian People's Aid) |
407 |
57.2% |
0.5724332 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
304 |
42.8% |
0.4275668 |
r8frflykt2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Newly-formed
initiative/organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
A newly-formed initiative/organisation (e.g. Refugees Welcome to Norway,
Drop in the Ocean)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A newly-formed initiative/organisation (e.g. Refugees Welcome to Norway, Drop in
the Ocean) |
59 |
8.3% |
0.08298172 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
652 |
91.7% |
0.91701828 |
r8frflykt2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Public body
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
A public body (municipality, agency etc.)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A public body (municipality, agency etc.) |
78 |
11.0% |
0.1097046 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
633 |
89.0% |
0.8902954 |
r8frflykt2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Private body
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
A private body
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A private body |
101 |
14.2% |
0.1420534 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
610 |
85.8% |
0.8579466 |
r8frflykt2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Asylum seekers´centre
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
An asylum seekers’ centre (public or private)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
An asylum seekers’ centre (public or private) |
37 |
5.2% |
0.05203938 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
674 |
94.8% |
0.94796062 |
r8frflykt2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Own initiative/together with
friends and family
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Organised work on own initiative/together with friends and family
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Organised work on own initiative/together with friends and family |
45 |
6.3% |
0.06329114 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
666 |
93.7% |
0.93670886 |
r8frflykt2_7
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
56 |
7.9% |
0.07876231 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
655 |
92.1% |
0.92123769 |
r8frflykt2_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Other [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8frflykt3_1
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by an organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by an organisation |
163 |
22.9% |
0.229254571 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004219409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
545 |
76.7% |
0.766526020 |
r8frflykt3_2
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via Facebook group
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via a Facebook group; specify which group:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited via a Facebook group; specify which group: |
30 |
4.2% |
0.042194093 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004219409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
678 |
95.4% |
0.953586498 |
r8frflykt3_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via Facebook group [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via a Facebook group; specify which group:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8frflykt3_3
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via the municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via the municipality in which I live
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited via the municipality in which I live |
34 |
4.8% |
0.047819972 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004219409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
674 |
94.8% |
0.947960619 |
r8frflykt3_4
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via asylum seekers´centre
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via an asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited via an asylum seekers’ centre |
4 |
0.6% |
0.005625879 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004219409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
704 |
99.0% |
0.990154712 |
r8frflykt3_5
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via private company
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via a private company
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited via a private company |
7 |
1.0% |
0.009845288 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004219409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
701 |
98.6% |
0.985935302 |
r8frflykt3_6
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by own workplace/place of study
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by my own workplace/place of study
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by my own workplace/place of study |
30 |
4.2% |
0.042194093 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004219409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
678 |
95.4% |
0.953586498 |
r8frflykt3_7
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by close friends
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by close friends
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by close friends |
67 |
9.4% |
0.094233474 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004219409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
641 |
90.2% |
0.901547117 |
r8frflykt3_8
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by acquaintances
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by acquaintances
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by acquaintances |
82 |
11.5% |
0.115330520 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004219409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
626 |
88.0% |
0.880450070 |
r8frflykt3_9
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by other persons
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by other persons
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by other persons |
33 |
4.6% |
0.046413502 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004219409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
675 |
94.9% |
0.949367089 |
r8frflykt3_10
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Own initiative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Took the initiative myself
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Took the initiative myself |
277 |
39.0% |
0.389592124 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004219409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
431 |
60.6% |
0.606188467 |
r8frflykt3_11
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
34 |
4.8% |
0.047819972 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004219409 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7901 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
674 |
94.8% |
0.947960619 |
r8frflykt3_11_other
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Other [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8frflykt4_1
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: Coverage in media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Advertising or coverage in newspapers, online newspapers, TV or radio
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Advertising or coverage in newspapers, online newspapers, TV or radio |
277 |
39.0% |
0.390140845 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004225352 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7902 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
430 |
60.6% |
0.605633803 |
r8frflykt4_2
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: By e-mail
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
By e-mail
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
By e-mail |
41 |
5.8% |
0.057746479 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004225352 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7902 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
666 |
93.8% |
0.938028169 |
r8frflykt4_3
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: On Facebook
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
On Facebook
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
On Facebook |
162 |
22.8% |
0.228169014 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004225352 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7902 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
545 |
76.8% |
0.767605634 |
r8frflykt4_4
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: On other social media (e. g. Twitter)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
On other social media (e. g. Twitter)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
On other social media (e. g. Twitter) |
18 |
2.5% |
0.025352113 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004225352 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7902 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
689 |
97.0% |
0.970422535 |
r8frflykt4_5
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: By SMS
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
By SMS text
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
By SMS text |
58 |
8.2% |
0.081690141 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004225352 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7902 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
649 |
91.4% |
0.914084507 |
r8frflykt4_6
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: By telephone
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
By telephone
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
By telephone |
23 |
3.2% |
0.032394366 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004225352 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7902 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
684 |
96.3% |
0.963380282 |
r8frflykt4_7
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: By face-to-face contact
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
By face-to-face contact
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
By face-to-face contact |
205 |
28.9% |
0.288732394 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004225352 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7902 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
502 |
70.7% |
0.707042254 |
r8frflykt4_8
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: Other places
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other places, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other places, specify: |
54 |
7.6% |
0.076056338 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004225352 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7902 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
653 |
92.0% |
0.919718310 |
r8frflykt4_8_other
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: Other places [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other places, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRflykt_1=1 or R8FRflykt_2=1 or R8FRflykt_3=1 or
R8FRflykt_4=1 or R8FRflykt_5=1.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8frfb
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you use Facebook?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you use Facebook?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Every day |
1313 |
59.0% |
0.58984726 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
285 |
12.8% |
0.12803235 |
| 3 |
A few times a month |
84 |
3.8% |
0.03773585 |
| 4 |
Less frequently |
61 |
2.7% |
0.02740341 |
| 5 |
Never |
152 |
6.8% |
0.06828392 |
| 6 |
I do not have a profile on Facebook |
308 |
13.8% |
0.13836478 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.0% |
0.01033243 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6386 |
|
NA |
r8frfb_2
|
Variable label:
|
Your Facebook network consists mainly of people who
|
|
Literal question:
|
Does your Facebook network consist mainly of people who…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRfb<5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Have the same political views as myself |
96 |
5.5% |
0.05507745 |
| 2 |
Have different political views than myself |
114 |
6.5% |
0.06540448 |
| 3 |
Have political views that are both similar and dissimilar to my own |
1466 |
84.1% |
0.84107860 |
| 97 |
No answer |
67 |
3.8% |
0.03843947 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6869 |
|
NA |
r8frfb_3
|
Variable label:
|
Amount of political content you see on Facebook
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much of the content you see on Facebook is connected to politics?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRfb<5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very much |
50 |
2.9% |
0.02868617 |
| 2 |
Quite a bit |
256 |
14.7% |
0.14687321 |
| 3 |
Some |
739 |
42.4% |
0.42398164 |
| 4 |
Little |
407 |
23.4% |
0.23350545 |
| 5 |
Very little |
259 |
14.9% |
0.14859438 |
| 97 |
No answer |
32 |
1.8% |
0.01835915 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6869 |
|
NA |
r8frfb_4
|
Variable label:
|
Likes being exposed to political viewpoints/content on Facebook
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you like being exposed to political viewpoints and content
on Facebook?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRfb<5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very much |
36 |
2.1% |
0.02065404 |
| 2 |
A lot |
280 |
16.1% |
0.16064257 |
| 3 |
Neither like or dislike it |
719 |
41.3% |
0.41250717 |
| 4 |
Somewhat |
413 |
23.7% |
0.23694779 |
| 5 |
To a very small extent |
252 |
14.5% |
0.14457831 |
| 97 |
No answer |
43 |
2.5% |
0.02467011 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6869 |
|
NA |
r8frfb_5
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you disagree with political viewpoints/content you see on
Facebook?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you disagree with political viewpoints and content that you
see on Facebook?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRfb<5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
102 |
5.9% |
0.05851979 |
| 2 |
Often |
488 |
28.0% |
0.27997705 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
896 |
51.4% |
0.51405622 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
154 |
8.8% |
0.08835341 |
| 5 |
Never |
35 |
2.0% |
0.02008032 |
| 97 |
No answer |
68 |
3.9% |
0.03901320 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6869 |
|
NA |
r8frfb_6
|
Variable label:
|
Are discussions about politics on Facebook more/less conflict-ridden
than similar discussions elsewhere?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you see discussions about society and politics on Facebook as more,
similarly or less conflict-ridden than similar discussions elsewhere?
|
|
Post-question:
|
For example, television, newspapers, elsewhere on the internet
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRfb<5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
More |
648 |
37.2% |
0.3717728 |
| 2 |
Similarly |
680 |
39.0% |
0.3901320 |
| 3 |
Less |
317 |
18.2% |
0.1818703 |
| 97 |
No answer |
98 |
5.6% |
0.0562249 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6869 |
|
NA |
r8frfb_7
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you follow Facebook groups you mostly disagree with
politically?
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you follow Facebook pages/groups that you mostly
disagree with politically?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRfb<5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006310958 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
39 |
2.2% |
0.022375215 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
259 |
14.9% |
0.148594378 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
589 |
33.8% |
0.337923121 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
797 |
45.7% |
0.457257602 |
| 97 |
No answer |
48 |
2.8% |
0.027538726 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6869 |
|
NA |
r8frfb_8
|
Variable label:
|
How often changed technical settings in order to see less
posts/block/remove people on Facebook because of political disagreement?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often have you changed the technical settings in order to see less
posts, block or remove people from your friend list on Facebook because
they post political content that you disagree with?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRfb<5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very often |
30 |
1.7% |
0.01721170 |
| 2 |
Often |
70 |
4.0% |
0.04016064 |
| 3 |
Sometimes |
355 |
20.4% |
0.20367183 |
| 4 |
Rarely |
467 |
26.8% |
0.26792886 |
| 5 |
Never |
781 |
44.8% |
0.44807803 |
| 97 |
No answer |
40 |
2.3% |
0.02294894 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6869 |
|
NA |
r8frfbeks_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=1. Randomly chosen text that is appended to R8FRbeks.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=1. Randomly chosen text that is appended to R8FRbeks.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1740] [Invalid:6872]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
NRK |
355 |
20.4% |
0.2040230 |
| 2 |
VG |
348 |
20.0% |
0.2000000 |
| 3 |
TV2 |
354 |
20.3% |
0.2034483 |
| 4 |
Dagbladet |
357 |
20.5% |
0.2051724 |
| 5 |
norske medier |
326 |
18.7% |
0.1873563 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6872 |
|
NA |
r8frfbeks
|
Variable label:
|
Degree of trust in facts on Facebook posted by media institution
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally thinking, how much trust do you have in the facts you see on
Facebook that are posted by [R8FRfbeks_ran]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8FRfb<5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - No confidence |
69 |
4.0% |
0.03958692 |
| 2 |
1 |
36 |
2.1% |
0.02065404 |
| 3 |
2 |
117 |
6.7% |
0.06712565 |
| 4 |
3 |
158 |
9.1% |
0.09064831 |
| 5 |
4 |
126 |
7.2% |
0.07228916 |
| 6 |
5 |
275 |
15.8% |
0.15777395 |
| 7 |
6 |
177 |
10.2% |
0.10154905 |
| 8 |
7 |
213 |
12.2% |
0.12220310 |
| 9 |
8 |
179 |
10.3% |
0.10269650 |
| 10 |
9 |
66 |
3.8% |
0.03786575 |
| 11 |
10 - Complete trust |
31 |
1.8% |
0.01778543 |
| 12 |
Not applicable |
278 |
15.9% |
0.15949512 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
1.0% |
0.01032702 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6869 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=1. Randomly chooses between R8PAD10_BN, R8PAD10_JN,
R8PAD10_BA and R8PAD10_JA.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=1. Randomly chooses between R8PAD10_BN, R8PAD10_JN,
R8PAD10_BA and R8PAD10_JA.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2208] [Invalid:6404]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Asked R8PAD10_BN |
547 |
24.8% |
0.2477355 |
| 2 |
Asked R8PAD10_JN |
537 |
24.3% |
0.2432065 |
| 3 |
Asked R8PAD10_BA |
574 |
26.0% |
0.2599638 |
| 4 |
Asked R8PAD10_JA |
550 |
24.9% |
0.2490942 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6404 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_bn_1
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluate choice, distribution of NOK 2000: Give NOK 0
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A is randomly selected to receive NOK 2,000. Person A can give
their money away to another randomly selected person B. Person A can
choose between giving nothing (NOK 0) to B, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK
1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000)”.
The table below shows the various choices person A can make themselves.
Please indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the five
actions are. By socially acceptable it is meant “to be in accordance
with moral or appropriate social behaviour”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give nothing to participant B (NOK 2000 to A, NOK 0 to B)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8PAD10_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
166 |
30.3% |
0.3034735 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
131 |
23.9% |
0.2394881 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
95 |
17.4% |
0.1736746 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
68 |
12.4% |
0.1243144 |
| 97 |
No answer |
87 |
15.9% |
0.1590494 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8065 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_bn_2
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluate choice, distribution of NOK 2000: Give NOK 500
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A is randomly selected to receive NOK 2,000. Person A can give
their money away to another randomly selected person B. Person A can
choose between giving nothing (NOK 0) to B, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK
1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000)”.
The table below shows the various choices person A can make themselves.
Please indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the five
actions are. By socially acceptable it is meant “to be in accordance
with moral or appropriate social behaviour”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give NOK 500 to participant B (NOK 1,500 to A, NOK 500 to B)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8PAD10_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
30 |
5.5% |
0.05484461 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
121 |
22.1% |
0.22120658 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
201 |
36.7% |
0.36745887 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
105 |
19.2% |
0.19195612 |
| 97 |
No answer |
90 |
16.5% |
0.16453382 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8065 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_bn_3
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluate choice, distribution of NOK 2000: Give NOK 1000
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A is randomly selected to receive NOK 2,000. Person A can give
their money away to another randomly selected person B. Person A can
choose between giving nothing (NOK 0) to B, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK
1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000)”.
The table below shows the various choices person A can make themselves.
Please indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the five
actions are. By socially acceptable it is meant “to be in accordance
with moral or appropriate social behaviour”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give NOK 1,000 to participant B (NOK 1,000 to A, NOK 1,000 to B)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8PAD10_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
20 |
3.7% |
0.03656307 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
21 |
3.8% |
0.03839122 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
99 |
18.1% |
0.18098720 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
339 |
62.0% |
0.61974406 |
| 97 |
No answer |
68 |
12.4% |
0.12431444 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8065 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_bn_4
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluate choice, distribution of NOK 2000: Give NOK 1500
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A is randomly selected to receive NOK 2,000. Person A can give
their money away to another randomly selected person B. Person A can
choose between giving nothing (NOK 0) to B, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK
1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000)”.
The table below shows the various choices person A can make themselves.
Please indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the five
actions are. By socially acceptable it is meant “to be in accordance
with moral or appropriate social behaviour”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give NOK 1,500 to participant B (NOK 500 to A, NOK 1,500 to B)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8PAD10_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
42 |
7.7% |
0.07678245 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
111 |
20.3% |
0.20292505 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
138 |
25.2% |
0.25228519 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
157 |
28.7% |
0.28702011 |
| 97 |
No answer |
99 |
18.1% |
0.18098720 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8065 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_bn_5
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluate choice, distribution of NOK 2000: Give NOK 2000
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A is randomly selected to receive NOK 2,000. Person A can give
their money away to another randomly selected person B. Person A can
choose between giving nothing (NOK 0) to B, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK
1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000)”.
The table below shows the various choices person A can make themselves.
Please indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the five
actions are. By socially acceptable it is meant “to be in accordance
with moral or appropriate social behaviour”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Give everything to participant B (NOK 0 to A, NOK 2,000 to B)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8PAD10_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
108 |
19.7% |
0.1974406 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
89 |
16.3% |
0.1627057 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
91 |
16.6% |
0.1663620 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
162 |
29.6% |
0.2961609 |
| 97 |
No answer |
97 |
17.7% |
0.1773309 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8065 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_jn_1
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluate choice, distribution of NOK 2000: Take NOK 0
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person B” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person B similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A is randomly selected to receive NOK 2,000. Person B is
randomly selected to take some of the money for person A. Person B can
choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from person A, NOK 500, NOK 1,000,
NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000)”.
The table below shows the various options person B can make themselves.
Please indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the five
actions are. By socially acceptable it is meant “to be in accordance
with moral or appropriate social behaviour”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Take nothing from participant A (NOK 2,000 to A, NOK 0 to B)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8PAD10_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
64 |
11.9% |
0.11918063 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
24 |
4.5% |
0.04469274 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
60 |
11.2% |
0.11173184 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
323 |
60.1% |
0.60148976 |
| 97 |
No answer |
66 |
12.3% |
0.12290503 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8075 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_jn_2
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluate choice, distribution of NOK 2000: Take NOK 500
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person B” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person B similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A is randomly selected to receive NOK 2,000. Person B is
randomly selected to take some of the money for person A. Person B can
choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from person A, NOK 500, NOK 1,000,
NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000)”.
The table below shows the various options person B can make themselves.
Please indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the five
actions are. By socially acceptable it is meant “to be in accordance
with moral or appropriate social behaviour”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Take NOK 500 from participant A (NOK 1,500 to A, NOK 500 to B)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8PAD10_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
113 |
21.0% |
0.2104283 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
76 |
14.2% |
0.1415270 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
163 |
30.4% |
0.3035382 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
105 |
19.6% |
0.1955307 |
| 97 |
No answer |
80 |
14.9% |
0.1489758 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8075 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_jn_3
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluate choice, distribution of NOK 2000: Take NOK 1000
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person B” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person B similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A is randomly selected to receive NOK 2,000. Person B is
randomly selected to take some of the money for person A. Person B can
choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from person A, NOK 500, NOK 1,000,
NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000)”.
The table below shows the various options person B can make themselves.
Please indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the five
actions are. By socially acceptable it is meant “to be in accordance
with moral or appropriate social behaviour”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Take NOK 1,000 from participant A (NOK 1,000 to A, NOK 1,000 to B)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8PAD10_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
133 |
24.8% |
0.2476723 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
75 |
14.0% |
0.1396648 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
120 |
22.3% |
0.2234637 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
135 |
25.1% |
0.2513966 |
| 97 |
No answer |
74 |
13.8% |
0.1378026 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8075 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_jn_4
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluate choice, distribution of NOK 2000: Take NOK 1500
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person B” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person B similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A is randomly selected to receive NOK 2,000. Person B is
randomly selected to take some of the money for person A. Person B can
choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from person A, NOK 500, NOK 1,000,
NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000)”.
The table below shows the various options person B can make themselves.
Please indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the five
actions are. By socially acceptable it is meant “to be in accordance
with moral or appropriate social behaviour”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 1,500 from participant A (NOK 500 to A, NOK 1,500 to B)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8PAD10_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
292 |
54.4% |
0.54376164 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
121 |
22.5% |
0.22532588 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
23 |
4.3% |
0.04283054 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
16 |
3.0% |
0.02979516 |
| 97 |
No answer |
85 |
15.8% |
0.15828678 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8075 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_jn_5
|
Variable label:
|
Evaluate choice, distribution of NOK 2000: Take NOK 2000
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person B” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person B similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A is randomly selected to receive NOK 2,000. Person B is
randomly selected to take some of the money for person A. Person B can
choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from person A, NOK 500, NOK 1,000,
NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000)”.
The table below shows the various options person B can make themselves.
Please indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the five
actions are. By socially acceptable it is meant “to be in accordance
with moral or appropriate social behaviour”.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Take everything from participant A (NOK 0 to A, NOK 2,000 to B)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8PAD10_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
406 |
75.6% |
0.75605214 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
20 |
3.7% |
0.03724395 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
7 |
1.3% |
0.01303538 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
21 |
3.9% |
0.03910615 |
| 97 |
No answer |
83 |
15.5% |
0.15456238 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8075 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_ba
|
Variable label:
|
Distribution of NOK 2000: I choose to give…
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Participant A in the Citizen Panel randomly selected to receive NOK
2,000. Participant A can give their money to another randomly selected
participant, participant B. If you are randomly selected to be a
participant A, you need to choose whether, and if so how much, to give
to participant B. What you give, is kept by participant B.
You can choose between giving nothing (NOK 0) to the second participant,
NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
|
|
Literal question:
|
I choose to give…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8PAD10_ran=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nothing (NOK 2,000 to you, NOK 0 to participant B) |
166 |
28.9% |
0.289198606 |
| 2 |
NOK 500 (NOK 1,500 to you, NOK 500 to participant B) |
93 |
16.2% |
0.162020906 |
| 3 |
NOK 1,000 (NOK 1,000 to you, NOK 1,000 to participant B) |
267 |
46.5% |
0.465156794 |
| 4 |
NOK 1,500 (NOK 500 to you, NOK 1,500 allocated to participant B) |
5 |
0.9% |
0.008710801 |
| 5 |
Everything (NOK 0 to you, NOK 2,000 to participant B) |
22 |
3.8% |
0.038327526 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
3.7% |
0.036585366 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8038 |
|
NA |
r8pad10_ja
|
Variable label:
|
Distribution of NOK 2000: I choose to take…
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Participant A in the Citizen Panel is randomly selected to receive
NOK 2,000. Someone else, participant B, is randomly selected to take
some of the money from participant A. If you are randomly selected to be
a participant B you must choose whether, and if so how much, you should
take from participant A. What you do not take is kept by participant
A.
You can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the second
participant, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
|
|
Literal question:
|
I choose to take…
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=1 and R8PAD10_ran=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nothing (NOK 0 to you, NOK 2,000 to participant A) |
227 |
41.3% |
0.412727273 |
| 2 |
NOK 500 (NOK 500 to you, NOK 1,500 to participant A) |
40 |
7.3% |
0.072727273 |
| 3 |
NOK 1,000 (NOK 1,000 to you, NOK 1000 Participant A) |
250 |
45.5% |
0.454545455 |
| 4 |
NOK 1,500 (NOK 1,500 to you, NOK 500 to participant A) |
4 |
0.7% |
0.007272727 |
| 5 |
Everything (NOK 2,000 to you, NOK 0 to participant A) |
22 |
4.0% |
0.040000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.3% |
0.012727273 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8062 |
|
NA |
r8pad1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Government most likely after this year’s parliamentary election: The
Christian Democrats
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which government is in your opinion the most likely after this year’s
parliamentary elections?
Select one or more parties from the list.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
405 |
19.0% |
0.1898734177 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009376465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1726 |
80.9% |
0.8091889358 |
r8pad1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Government most likely after this year’s parliamentary election: The
Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which government is in your opinion the most likely after this year’s
parliamentary elections?
Select one or more parties from the list.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Conservative Party |
754 |
35.3% |
0.3534927332 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009376465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1377 |
64.6% |
0.6455696203 |
r8pad1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Government most likely after this year’s parliamentary election: The
Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which government is in your opinion the most likely after this year’s
parliamentary elections?
Select one or more parties from the list.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Progress Party |
446 |
20.9% |
0.2090951711 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009376465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1685 |
79.0% |
0.7899671824 |
r8pad1_4
|
Variable label:
|
Government most likely after this year’s parliamentary election: The
Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which government is in your opinion the most likely after this year’s
parliamentary elections?
Select one or more parties from the list.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Liberal Party |
245 |
11.5% |
0.1148616971 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009376465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1886 |
88.4% |
0.8842006564 |
r8pad1_5
|
Variable label:
|
Government most likely after this year’s parliamentary election: The
Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which government is in your opinion the most likely after this year’s
parliamentary elections?
Select one or more parties from the list.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Socialist Left Party |
356 |
16.7% |
0.1669010783 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009376465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1775 |
83.2% |
0.8321612752 |
r8pad1_6
|
Variable label:
|
Government most likely after this year’s parliamentary election: The
Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which government is in your opinion the most likely after this year’s
parliamentary elections?
Select one or more parties from the list.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Centre Party |
752 |
35.3% |
0.3525550867 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009376465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1379 |
64.7% |
0.6465072668 |
r8pad1_7
|
Variable label:
|
Government most likely after this year’s parliamentary election: The
Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which government is in your opinion the most likely after this year’s
parliamentary elections?
Select one or more parties from the list.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Green Party |
157 |
7.4% |
0.0736052508 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009376465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1974 |
92.5% |
0.9254571027 |
r8pad1_8
|
Variable label:
|
Government most likely after this year’s parliamentary election: The
Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which government is in your opinion the most likely after this year’s
parliamentary elections?
Select one or more parties from the list.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
1231 |
57.7% |
0.5771214252 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009376465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
900 |
42.2% |
0.4219409283 |
r8pad1_9
|
Variable label:
|
Government most likely after this year’s parliamentary election: The Red
Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which government is in your opinion the most likely after this year’s
parliamentary elections?
Select one or more parties from the list.
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
60 |
2.8% |
0.0281293952 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009376465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2071 |
97.1% |
0.9709329583 |
r8pad1_10
|
Variable label:
|
Government most likely after this year’s parliamentary election: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which government is in your opinion the most likely after this year’s
parliamentary elections?
Select one or more parties from the list.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other: |
56 |
2.6% |
0.0262541022 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009376465 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2075 |
97.3% |
0.9728082513 |
r8pad1_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Government most likely after this year’s parliamentary election: Other
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which government is in your opinion the most likely after this year’s
parliamentary elections?
Select one or more parties from the list.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8km2_comment_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3. Randomly chooses if R8KM2_comment should be
asked to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3. Randomly chooses if R8KM2_comment should be
asked to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4244] [Invalid:4368]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Respondent is not asked R8KM2_comment. |
2143 |
50.5% |
0.5049482 |
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8KM2_comment. |
2101 |
49.5% |
0.4950518 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4368 |
|
NA |
r8km2_answer_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3. Randomizes the answerlist of R8KM2. 1= not
changing -> due to human action. 2= due to human action -> not
changing.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3. Randomizes the answerlist of R8KM2. 1= not
changing -> due to human action. 2= due to human action -> not
changing.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4244] [Invalid:4368]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not changing -> Changing due to human activity |
2131 |
50.2% |
0.5021206 |
| 2 |
Changing due to human activity-> Not changing |
2113 |
49.8% |
0.4978794 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4368 |
|
NA |
r8km2
|
Variable label:
|
Which statement best describes your view on climate change?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following statements best describes
your view on climate change?
|
|
Post-question:
|
Choose one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3.The order of the answer list is randomized. Please
see R8KM2_answer_ran. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I believe that the climate is not changing. |
19 |
0.4% |
0.004473746 |
| 2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
164 |
3.9% |
0.038615493 |
| 3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it has little to do with human
action |
1071 |
25.2% |
0.252178008 |
| 4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it to a large extent is due to
human action. |
2925 |
68.9% |
0.688721450 |
| 97 |
No answer |
68 |
1.6% |
0.016011302 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4365 |
|
NA |
r8km2_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Comments on your view on climate change [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments, please write them here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3 and R8KM2_comment_ran=1. Asked on the same page
as R8KM2.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8km3_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=2. Randomly chooses R8KM3_a or R8KM3_b to ask the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2. Randomly chooses R8KM3_a or R8KM3_b to ask the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2128] [Invalid:6484]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8KM3_a |
1071 |
50.3% |
0.5032895 |
| 2 |
Respondent is asked R8KM3_b |
1057 |
49.7% |
0.4967105 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6484 |
|
NA |
r8km3_comment_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=2. Randomly chooses if R8KM3_comment should be asked to
the respondent. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2. Randomly chooses if R8KM3_comment should be asked to
the respondent. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2128] [Invalid:6484]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Respondent is not asked R8KM3_comment |
1050 |
49.3% |
0.4934211 |
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8KM3_comment |
1078 |
50.7% |
0.5065789 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6484 |
|
NA |
r8km3_a
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best climate policy
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party has the best climate policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM3_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
78 |
7.3% |
0.072829132 |
| 2 |
The Progress Party |
31 |
2.9% |
0.028944911 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party |
92 |
8.6% |
0.085901027 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
80 |
7.5% |
0.074696545 |
| 5 |
The Centre Party |
51 |
4.8% |
0.047619048 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
10 |
0.9% |
0.009337068 |
| 7 |
The Liberal Party |
116 |
10.8% |
0.108309991 |
| 8 |
Red |
13 |
1.2% |
0.012138189 |
| 9 |
The Green Party |
268 |
25.0% |
0.250233427 |
| 10 |
Other [write down]: |
19 |
1.8% |
0.017740430 |
| 11 |
None |
248 |
23.2% |
0.231559290 |
| 97 |
No answer |
65 |
6.1% |
0.060690943 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7541 |
|
NA |
r8km3_a_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best climate policy, other [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party has the best climate policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM3_ran=1.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8km3_b
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best environmental policy
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party has the best environmental policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM3_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
91 |
8.6% |
0.08609272 |
| 2 |
The Progress Party |
30 |
2.8% |
0.02838221 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party |
92 |
8.7% |
0.08703879 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
76 |
7.2% |
0.07190161 |
| 5 |
The Centre Party |
78 |
7.4% |
0.07379376 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
11 |
1.0% |
0.01040681 |
| 7 |
The Liberal Party |
98 |
9.3% |
0.09271523 |
| 8 |
Red |
15 |
1.4% |
0.01419111 |
| 9 |
The Green Party |
277 |
26.2% |
0.26206244 |
| 10 |
Other [write down]: |
14 |
1.3% |
0.01324503 |
| 11 |
None |
215 |
20.3% |
0.20340587 |
| 97 |
No answer |
60 |
5.7% |
0.05676443 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7555 |
|
NA |
r8km3_b_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best environmental policy, other [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party has the best environmental policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM3_ran=2.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8km3_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Comments to party with the best climate/environmental politicy [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments, please write them here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM3_comment_ran=1.Asked on the same page as
R8KM3_a/b.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8km4_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 og R8KM4_b_filter=0. Randomly chooses R8KM4_a or
R8KM4_b to ask the respondent. Randomizes only if the respondent has not
answered on a similiar question in previous waves.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 og R8KM4_b_filter=0. Randomly chooses R8KM4_a or
R8KM4_b to ask the respondent. Randomizes only if the respondent has not
answered on a similiar question in previous waves.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1282] [Invalid:7330]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8KM4_a |
646 |
50.4% |
0.5039002 |
| 2 |
Respondent is asked R8KM4_b |
636 |
49.6% |
0.4960998 |
| Sysmiss |
|
7330 |
|
NA |
r8km4_a
|
Variable label:
|
Statement closest to your view: Should/should not be drilling for
oil/gas off Lofoten/Vesterålen
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which statement comes closest to your view:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM4_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
There should be drilling for oil and gas off the Lofoten islands and Vesterålen. |
236 |
36.5% |
0.36532508 |
| 2 |
There should not be drilling for oil and gas off the Lofoten islands and
Vesterålen. |
393 |
60.8% |
0.60835913 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7966 |
|
NA |
r8km4_b
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and
Vesterålen areas
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. We should not allow oil and gas
extraction in the Lofoten and Vesterålen areas.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM4_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
177 |
27.8% |
0.27830189 |
| 2 |
Agree |
115 |
18.1% |
0.18081761 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
76 |
11.9% |
0.11949686 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
115 |
18.1% |
0.18081761 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
63 |
9.9% |
0.09905660 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
49 |
7.7% |
0.07704403 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
32 |
5.0% |
0.05031447 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.4% |
0.01415094 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7976 |
|
NA |
r8km5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you
agree/disagree with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM5_filter=0.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
81 |
4.2% |
0.04201245 |
| 2 |
Agree |
279 |
14.5% |
0.14470954 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
724 |
37.6% |
0.37551867 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
426 |
22.1% |
0.22095436 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
181 |
9.4% |
0.09387967 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
148 |
7.7% |
0.07676349 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
41 |
2.1% |
0.02126556 |
| 97 |
No answer |
48 |
2.5% |
0.02489627 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6684 |
|
NA |
r8km5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Citizens of rich countries should cut their consumption
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you
agree/disagree with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption
as part of the solution to the climate challenge.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM5_filter=0.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
338 |
17.5% |
0.17531120 |
| 2 |
Agree |
558 |
28.9% |
0.28941909 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
509 |
26.4% |
0.26400415 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
211 |
10.9% |
0.10943983 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
107 |
5.5% |
0.05549793 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
114 |
5.9% |
0.05912863 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
62 |
3.2% |
0.03215768 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
1.5% |
0.01504149 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6684 |
|
NA |
r8km7_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=2. Randomly chooses R8KM7_a or R8KM7_b to ask the
respondent. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2. Randomly chooses R8KM7_a or R8KM7_b to ask the
respondent. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2122] [Invalid:6490]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8KM7_a |
1076 |
50.7% |
0.5070688 |
| 2 |
Respondent is asked R8KM7_b |
1046 |
49.3% |
0.4929312 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6490 |
|
NA |
r8km7_a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from easiest to hardest to implement:
Public transport instead of private cars
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the easiest for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the easiest as 1 and the hardest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Utilising public transport instead of private cars
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
187 |
17.4% |
0.17379182 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7536 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
139 |
12.9% |
0.12918216 |
| 2 |
|
112 |
10.4% |
0.10408922 |
| 3 |
|
76 |
7.1% |
0.07063197 |
| 4 |
|
76 |
7.1% |
0.07063197 |
| 5 |
|
79 |
7.3% |
0.07342007 |
| 6 |
|
148 |
13.8% |
0.13754647 |
| 7 |
|
259 |
24.1% |
0.24070632 |
r8km7_a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from easiest to hardest to implement:
Reducing holiday travel by plane
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the easiest for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the easiest as 1 and the hardest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reducing holiday travel by plane
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
215 |
20.0% |
0.19981413 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7536 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
123 |
11.4% |
0.11431227 |
| 2 |
|
63 |
5.9% |
0.05855019 |
| 3 |
|
72 |
6.7% |
0.06691450 |
| 4 |
|
79 |
7.3% |
0.07342007 |
| 5 |
|
103 |
9.6% |
0.09572491 |
| 6 |
|
192 |
17.8% |
0.17843866 |
| 7 |
|
229 |
21.3% |
0.21282528 |
r8km7_a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from easiest to hardest to implement:
Eating less meat
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the easiest for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the easiest as 1 and the hardest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Eating less meat
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
217 |
20.2% |
0.20167286 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7536 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
93 |
8.6% |
0.08643123 |
| 2 |
|
95 |
8.8% |
0.08828996 |
| 3 |
|
92 |
8.6% |
0.08550186 |
| 4 |
|
126 |
11.7% |
0.11710037 |
| 5 |
|
139 |
12.9% |
0.12918216 |
| 6 |
|
158 |
14.7% |
0.14684015 |
| 7 |
|
156 |
14.5% |
0.14498141 |
r8km7_a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from easiest to hardest to implement:
Buying fewer goods
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the easiest for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the easiest as 1 and the hardest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Buying fewer goods than before
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
176 |
16.4% |
0.16356877 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7536 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
99 |
9.2% |
0.09200743 |
| 2 |
|
146 |
13.6% |
0.13568773 |
| 3 |
|
162 |
15.1% |
0.15055762 |
| 4 |
|
177 |
16.4% |
0.16449814 |
| 5 |
|
166 |
15.4% |
0.15427509 |
| 6 |
|
93 |
8.6% |
0.08643123 |
| 7 |
|
57 |
5.3% |
0.05297398 |
r8km7_a_5
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from easiest to hardest to implement:
Buying energy efficient appliances
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the easiest for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the easiest as 1 and the hardest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Buying energy efficient appliances (e.g. white goods, heaters) despite
there being cheaper alternatives
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
152 |
14.1% |
0.14126394 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7536 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
113 |
10.5% |
0.10501859 |
| 2 |
|
185 |
17.2% |
0.17193309 |
| 3 |
|
165 |
15.3% |
0.15334572 |
| 4 |
|
164 |
15.2% |
0.15241636 |
| 5 |
|
125 |
11.6% |
0.11617100 |
| 6 |
|
116 |
10.8% |
0.10780669 |
| 7 |
|
56 |
5.2% |
0.05204461 |
r8km7_a_6
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from easiest to hardest to implement:
Buying things that will last a long time/can be reused
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the easiest for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the easiest as 1 and the hardest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Buying things that will last a long time/can be reused
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
116 |
10.8% |
0.10780669 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7536 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
208 |
19.3% |
0.19330855 |
| 2 |
|
210 |
19.5% |
0.19516729 |
| 3 |
|
213 |
19.8% |
0.19795539 |
| 4 |
|
152 |
14.1% |
0.14126394 |
| 5 |
|
115 |
10.7% |
0.10687732 |
| 6 |
|
49 |
4.6% |
0.04553903 |
| 7 |
|
13 |
1.2% |
0.01208178 |
r8km7_a_7
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from easiest to hardest to implement:
Saving energy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the easiest for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the easiest as 1 and the hardest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Saving energy (e.g. turning down the heating, turning off lights in
rooms not in use)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
123 |
11.4% |
0.11431227 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7536 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
271 |
25.2% |
0.25185874 |
| 2 |
|
193 |
17.9% |
0.17936803 |
| 3 |
|
182 |
16.9% |
0.16914498 |
| 4 |
|
100 |
9.3% |
0.09293680 |
| 5 |
|
111 |
10.3% |
0.10315985 |
| 6 |
|
62 |
5.8% |
0.05762082 |
| 7 |
|
34 |
3.2% |
0.03159851 |
r8km7_b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from hardest to easiest to implement:
Public transport instead of private cars
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the most difficult for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the hardest as 1 and the easiest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Utilising public transport instead of private cars
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
155 |
14.8% |
0.14818356 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7566 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
379 |
36.2% |
0.36233270 |
| 2 |
|
122 |
11.7% |
0.11663480 |
| 3 |
|
66 |
6.3% |
0.06309751 |
| 4 |
|
57 |
5.4% |
0.05449331 |
| 5 |
|
54 |
5.2% |
0.05162524 |
| 6 |
|
89 |
8.5% |
0.08508604 |
| 7 |
|
124 |
11.9% |
0.11854685 |
r8km7_b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from hardest to easiest to implement:
Reducing holiday travel by plane
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the most difficult for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the hardest as 1 and the easiest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reducing holiday travel by plane
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
202 |
19.3% |
0.19311663 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7566 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
195 |
18.6% |
0.18642447 |
| 2 |
|
170 |
16.3% |
0.16252390 |
| 3 |
|
111 |
10.6% |
0.10611855 |
| 4 |
|
89 |
8.5% |
0.08508604 |
| 5 |
|
67 |
6.4% |
0.06405354 |
| 6 |
|
82 |
7.8% |
0.07839388 |
| 7 |
|
130 |
12.4% |
0.12428298 |
r8km7_b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from hardest to easiest to implement:
Eating less meat
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the most difficult for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the hardest as 1 and the easiest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Eating less meat
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
219 |
20.9% |
0.20936902 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7566 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
135 |
12.9% |
0.12906310 |
| 2 |
|
158 |
15.1% |
0.15105163 |
| 3 |
|
114 |
10.9% |
0.10898662 |
| 4 |
|
93 |
8.9% |
0.08891013 |
| 5 |
|
91 |
8.7% |
0.08699809 |
| 6 |
|
106 |
10.1% |
0.10133843 |
| 7 |
|
130 |
12.4% |
0.12428298 |
r8km7_b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from hardest to easiest to implement:
Buying fewer goods
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the most difficult for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the hardest as 1 and the easiest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Buying fewer goods than before
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
239 |
22.8% |
0.22848948 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7566 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
70 |
6.7% |
0.06692161 |
| 2 |
|
136 |
13.0% |
0.13001912 |
| 3 |
|
172 |
16.4% |
0.16443595 |
| 4 |
|
154 |
14.7% |
0.14722753 |
| 5 |
|
134 |
12.8% |
0.12810707 |
| 6 |
|
89 |
8.5% |
0.08508604 |
| 7 |
|
52 |
5.0% |
0.04971319 |
r8km7_b_5
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from hardest to easiest to implement:
Buying energy efficient appliances
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the most difficult for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the hardest as 1 and the easiest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Buying energy efficient appliances (e.g. white goods, heaters) despite
there being cheaper alternatives
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
235 |
22.5% |
0.22466539 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7566 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
79 |
7.6% |
0.07552581 |
| 2 |
|
134 |
12.8% |
0.12810707 |
| 3 |
|
123 |
11.8% |
0.11759082 |
| 4 |
|
133 |
12.7% |
0.12715105 |
| 5 |
|
146 |
14.0% |
0.13957935 |
| 6 |
|
126 |
12.0% |
0.12045889 |
| 7 |
|
70 |
6.7% |
0.06692161 |
r8km7_b_6
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from hardest to easiest to implement:
Buying things that will last a long time/can be reused
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the most difficult for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the hardest as 1 and the easiest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Buying things that will last a long time/can be reused
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
234 |
22.4% |
0.22370937 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7566 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
53 |
5.1% |
0.05066922 |
| 2 |
|
86 |
8.2% |
0.08221797 |
| 3 |
|
134 |
12.8% |
0.12810707 |
| 4 |
|
130 |
12.4% |
0.12428298 |
| 5 |
|
171 |
16.3% |
0.16347992 |
| 6 |
|
153 |
14.6% |
0.14627151 |
| 7 |
|
85 |
8.1% |
0.08126195 |
r8km7_b_7
|
Variable label:
|
Rating environmental measures, from hardest to easiest to implement:
Saving energy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In order to prevent or limit damaging climate change, it is often
asserted that we as individuals must contribute towards a change-over to
a low carbon society.
Which of the following measures are the most difficult for you to
implement?
Rate from 1 to 7 with the hardest as 1 and the easiest as 7.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Saving energy (e.g. turning down the heating, turning off lights in
rooms not in use)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM7_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 97 |
No answer |
213 |
20.4% |
0.20363289 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7566 |
|
NA |
| 1 |
|
94 |
9.0% |
0.08986616 |
| 2 |
|
90 |
8.6% |
0.08604207 |
| 3 |
|
117 |
11.2% |
0.11185468 |
| 4 |
|
131 |
12.5% |
0.12523901 |
| 5 |
|
111 |
10.6% |
0.10611855 |
| 6 |
|
122 |
11.7% |
0.11663480 |
| 7 |
|
168 |
16.1% |
0.16061185 |
r8km7_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Comments to environmental measures [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments, please write them here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. Asked on the same page as R8KM7_a/b.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8km8
|
Variable label:
|
To what extent is it possible to prevent harmful climate change?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let us assume that climate change can be a major problem for the world
in the future if nothing is done about it.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think it is possible to prevent harmful climate
change?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It is impossible to prevent harmful climate change |
183 |
8.6% |
0.08579466 |
| 2 |
It is possible, but very difficult, to prevent harmful climate change |
1428 |
66.9% |
0.66947961 |
| 3 |
It is possible and entirely realistic to prevent harmful climate change. |
441 |
20.7% |
0.20675105 |
| 4 |
It is easy to prevent harmful climate change |
22 |
1.0% |
0.01031411 |
| 97 |
No answer |
59 |
2.8% |
0.02766057 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
r8km8_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Comments to climate change [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments, please write them here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. Asked on the same page as R8KM8]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8km9_comment_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly chooses if R8KM9_comment should be asked to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly chooses if R8KM9_comment should be asked to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2112] [Invalid:6500]
[Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Respondent is not asked R8KM3_comment |
1028 |
48.7% |
0.4867424 |
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8KM3_comment |
1084 |
51.3% |
0.5132576 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6500 |
|
NA |
r8km9
|
Variable label:
|
How great is the diversity in opinion on climate change that emerges in
the media?
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how great is the diversity in opinion on climate change
that emerges in the media?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very great diversity |
68 |
3.2% |
0.03187998 |
| 2 |
Great diversity |
531 |
24.9% |
0.24894515 |
| 3 |
Some diversity |
927 |
43.5% |
0.43459916 |
| 4 |
Little diversity |
481 |
22.6% |
0.22550398 |
| 5 |
No diversity at all |
53 |
2.5% |
0.02484763 |
| 97 |
No answer |
73 |
3.4% |
0.03422410 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
r8km9_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Comments to diversity in opinion on climate change [Data withheld for
the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments, please write them here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM9_comment_ran=1.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8km10_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=2. Randomly chooses if R8KM10_a, R8KM10_b, R8KM10_c or
R8KM10_d should be asked to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2. Randomly chooses if R8KM10_a, R8KM10_b, R8KM10_c or
R8KM10_d should be asked to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2110] [Invalid:6502]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8KM10_a |
518 |
24.5% |
0.2454976 |
| 2 |
Respondent is asked R8KM10_b |
521 |
24.7% |
0.2469194 |
| 3 |
Respondent is asked R8KM10_c |
531 |
25.2% |
0.2516588 |
| 4 |
Respondent is asked R8KM10_d |
540 |
25.6% |
0.2559242 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6502 |
|
NA |
r8km10_a
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts concerning lawsuit against Arctic oil drilling: Oil exploration
in violation of the Constitution’s environmental provisions, critics
argue courts should not decide
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The lawsuit by environmental NGOs against the government over oil
drilling in the Arctic, is an attempt to stop the Norwegian Government’s
planned oil drilling in the Arctic by taking the matter to court and
getting the permit for oil exploration declared void. The environmental
NGOs that are bringing the case are arguing that oil exploration in the
Arctic is in violation of the Constitution’s environmental provisions.
The critics argue that this is a political issue that the courts should
not decide on.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about this:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM10_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think that the courts should make decisions on such questions. |
191 |
36.9% |
0.36872587 |
| 2 |
I do not think the courts should make decisions on such questions. |
135 |
26.1% |
0.26061776 |
| 3 |
I have no opinion on this |
177 |
34.2% |
0.34169884 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
2.9% |
0.02895753 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8094 |
|
NA |
r8km10_b
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts concerning lawsuit against Arctic oil drilling: Oil exploration
in violation of the Constitution’s environmental provisions + excerpts
from law, critics argue courts should not decide
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The lawsuit by environmental NGOs against the government over oil
drilling in the Arctic, is an attempt to stop the Norwegian Government’s
planned oil drilling in the Arctic by taking the matter to court and
getting the permit for oil exploration declared void. The environmental
NGOs bringing the case are supported among others by leading lawyers who
claim that oil exploration in the Arctic is in violation of
Environmental provision (§112) of the Norwegian Constitution. This says
among other things that “everyone has the right to an environment that
ensures health and to a nature where productivity and diversity are
preserved. Natural resources must be managed on the basis of
comprehensive long-term considerations that will safeguard this right
for future generations as well. State authorities must put into effect
measures to implement these principles”. The critics argue that this is
a political issue that the courts should not decide on.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about this:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM10_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think that the courts should make decisions on such questions. |
209 |
40.1% |
0.40115163 |
| 2 |
I do not think the courts should make decisions on such questions. |
124 |
23.8% |
0.23800384 |
| 3 |
I have no opinion on this |
178 |
34.2% |
0.34165067 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.9% |
0.01919386 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8091 |
|
NA |
r8km10_c
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts concerning lawsuit against Arctic oil drilling: Oil exploration
in violation of the Constitution’s environmental provisions, critics
argue courts should not decide because of power sharing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The lawsuit by environmental NGOs against the government over oil
drilling in the Arctic, is an attempt to stop the Norwegian Government’s
planned oil drilling in the Arctic by taking the matter to court and
getting the permit for oil exploration declared void. The environmental
NGOs that are bringing the case are arguing that oil exploration in the
Arctic is in violation of the environmental provisions of the Norwegian
Constitution. Critics argue that this is a political question that the
courts should not decide on, due to the principles of power sharing
between the government, parliament and judiciary. Leading law professors
believe that if the court supports the plaintiffs that it will be a
revolution in Norwegian legal tradition.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about this:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM10_ran=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think that the courts should make decisions on such questions. |
138 |
26.0% |
0.25988701 |
| 2 |
I do not think the courts should make decisions on such questions. |
154 |
29.0% |
0.29001883 |
| 3 |
I have no opinion on this |
225 |
42.4% |
0.42372881 |
| 97 |
No answer |
14 |
2.6% |
0.02636535 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8081 |
|
NA |
r8km10_d
|
Variable label:
|
Thoughts concerning lawsuit against Arctic oil drilling: Oil exploration
in violation of the Constitution’s environmental provisions, critics
argue courts should not decide, similar proceedings in other countries
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The lawsuit by environmental NGOs against the government over oil
drilling in the Arctic, is an attempt to stop the Norwegian Government’s
planned oil drilling in the Arctic by taking the matter to court and
getting the permit for oil exploration declared void. The environmental
NGOs that are bringing the case are arguing that oil exploration in the
Arctic is in violation of the environmental provisions of the Norwegian
Constitution. The critics argue that this is a political issue that the
courts should not decide on. Similar legal proceedings have been
conducted in other countries.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about this:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 and R8KM10_ran=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I think that the courts should make decisions on such questions. |
226 |
41.9% |
0.41851852 |
| 2 |
I do not think the courts should make decisions on such questions. |
133 |
24.6% |
0.24629630 |
| 3 |
I have no opinion on this |
174 |
32.2% |
0.32222222 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.3% |
0.01296296 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8072 |
|
NA |
r8km10_comment
|
Variable label:
|
Comments to lawsuit against Arctic oil drilling [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments, please write them here.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8skam1
|
Variable label:
|
Did you follow the television series SKAM?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Did you follow the television series SKAM?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No |
1528 |
72.3% |
0.72280038 |
| 2 |
A little |
198 |
9.4% |
0.09366131 |
| 3 |
A lot |
113 |
5.3% |
0.05345317 |
| 4 |
Yes, everything |
259 |
12.3% |
0.12251656 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
0.8% |
0.00756859 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6498 |
|
NA |
r8skam2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Usually followed SKAM by: Watched on TV when episodes are sent on Friday
nights
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How have you usually followed SKAM? Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Watched the episodes on TV when they are sent on Friday nights
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM1>1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Watched the episodes on TV when they are sent on Friday nights |
113 |
19.3% |
0.19283276 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.7% |
0.02730375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8026 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
457 |
78.0% |
0.77986348 |
r8skam2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Usually followed SKAM by: Streamed several episodes consecutively from
nrk.no
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How have you usually followed SKAM? Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Streamed several episodes consecutively from nrk.no
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM1>1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Streamed several episodes consecutively from nrk.no |
389 |
66.4% |
0.66382253 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.7% |
0.02730375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8026 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
181 |
30.9% |
0.30887372 |
r8skam2_3
|
Variable label:
|
Usually followed SKAM by: Visited official website
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How have you usually followed SKAM? Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Visited the official website (skam.p3.no)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM1>1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Visited the official website (skam.p3.no) |
212 |
36.2% |
0.36177474 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.7% |
0.02730375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8026 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
358 |
61.1% |
0.61092150 |
r8skam2_4
|
Variable label:
|
Usually followed SKAM by: Visited Instagram
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How have you usually followed SKAM? Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Visited Instagram
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM1>1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Visited Instagram |
75 |
12.8% |
0.12798635 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.7% |
0.02730375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8026 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
495 |
84.5% |
0.84470990 |
r8skam2_5
|
Variable label:
|
Usually followed SKAM by: Used mobile phone to watch episode/parts of
episode
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How have you usually followed SKAM? Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Used a mobile phone to watch episodes or parts of an episode
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM1>1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Used a mobile phone to watch episodes or parts of an episode |
142 |
24.2% |
0.24232082 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.7% |
0.02730375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8026 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
428 |
73.0% |
0.73037543 |
r8skam2_6
|
Variable label:
|
Usually followed SKAM by: Read comments on official website
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How have you usually followed SKAM? Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Read comments on the official website (skam.p3.no)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM1>1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Read comments on the official website (skam.p3.no) |
88 |
15.0% |
0.15017065 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.7% |
0.02730375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8026 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
482 |
82.3% |
0.82252560 |
r8skam2_7
|
Variable label:
|
Usually followed SKAM by: Read discussions on other websites/social
media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How have you usually followed SKAM? Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Read discussions about SKAM on other websites or in social media
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM1>1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Read discussions about SKAM on other websites or in social media |
95 |
16.2% |
0.16211604 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.7% |
0.02730375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8026 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
475 |
81.1% |
0.81058020 |
r8skam2_8
|
Variable label:
|
Usually followed SKAM by: Written comments about SKAM on official
website
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How have you usually followed SKAM? Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Written comments about SKAM on the official website (skam.p3.no)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM1>1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Written comments about SKAM on the official website (skam.p3.no) |
9 |
1.5% |
0.01535836 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.7% |
0.02730375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8026 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
561 |
95.7% |
0.95733788 |
r8skam2_9
|
Variable label:
|
Usually followed SKAM by: Written comments about SKAM on other
websites/social media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How have you usually followed SKAM? Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Written comments about SKAM on other websites or in social media
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM1>1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Written comments about SKAM on other websites or in social media |
10 |
1.7% |
0.01706485 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.7% |
0.02730375 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8026 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
560 |
95.6% |
0.95563140 |
r8skam3
|
Variable label:
|
How often do you check the official SKAM website in the middle of a
season?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you check the official SKAM website when it is in the
middle of a season?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM2_3=1 or R8SKAM2_6=1 or R8SKAM2_8=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rarely |
66 |
29.6% |
0.2959641 |
| 2 |
Weekly |
66 |
29.6% |
0.2959641 |
| 3 |
Daily |
55 |
24.7% |
0.2466368 |
| 4 |
Several times per day |
36 |
16.1% |
0.1614350 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8389 |
|
NA |
r8skam4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Other than the official websites visited to discuss/read about SKAM:
Facebook
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which other websites than the official sites at nrk.no and Instagram
have you visited to discuss or read about SKAM? Several answers are
possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Facebook
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM2_6=1 or R8SKAM2_7=1 or R8SKAM2_8=1 or
R8SKAM2_9=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Facebook |
69 |
46.6% |
0.466216216 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8464 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
78 |
52.7% |
0.527027027 |
r8skam4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Other than the official websites visited to discuss/read about SKAM:
Tumblr
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which other websites than the official sites at nrk.no and Instagram
have you visited to discuss or read about SKAM? Several answers are
possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Tumblr
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM2_6=1 or R8SKAM2_7=1 or R8SKAM2_8=1 or
R8SKAM2_9=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Tumblr |
5 |
3.4% |
0.033783784 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8464 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
142 |
95.9% |
0.959459459 |
r8skam4_3
|
Variable label:
|
Other than the official websites visited to discuss/read about SKAM:
Reddit
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which other websites than the official sites at nrk.no and Instagram
have you visited to discuss or read about SKAM? Several answers are
possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Reddit
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM2_6=1 or R8SKAM2_7=1 or R8SKAM2_8=1 or
R8SKAM2_9=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Reddit |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8464 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
146 |
98.6% |
0.986486486 |
r8skam4_4
|
Variable label:
|
Other than the official websites visited to discuss/read about SKAM:
Twitter
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which other websites than the official sites at nrk.no and Instagram
have you visited to discuss or read about SKAM? Several answers are
possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Twitter
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM2_6=1 or R8SKAM2_7=1 or R8SKAM2_8=1 or
R8SKAM2_9=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Twitter |
6 |
4.1% |
0.040540541 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8464 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
141 |
95.3% |
0.952702703 |
r8skam4_5
|
Variable label:
|
Other than the official websites visited to discuss/read about SKAM:
Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which other websites than the official sites at nrk.no and Instagram
have you visited to discuss or read about SKAM? Several answers are
possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM2_6=1 or R8SKAM2_7=1 or R8SKAM2_8=1 or
R8SKAM2_9=5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other |
19 |
12.8% |
0.128378378 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8464 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
128 |
86.5% |
0.864864865 |
r8skam4_5_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other than the official websites visited to discuss/read about SKAM:
Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which other websites than the official sites at nrk.no and Instagram
have you visited to discuss or read about SKAM? Several answers are
possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Annet
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM2_6=1 or R8SKAM2_7=1 or R8SKAM2_8=1 or
R8SKAM2_9=6.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8skam4_6
|
Variable label:
|
Other than the official websites visited to discuss/read about SKAM:
None
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which other websites than the official sites at nrk.no and Instagram
have you visited to discuss or read about SKAM? Several answers are
possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
None
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8SKAM2_6=1 or R8SKAM2_7=1 or R8SKAM2_8=1 or
R8SKAM2_9=7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
65 |
43.9% |
0.439189189 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8464 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
82 |
55.4% |
0.554054054 |
r8pad7
|
Variable label:
|
Referendum on the merging of municipalities has been held in your
municipality the last couple of years
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We want to know more about what people think about the use of
referendums in cases involving the merging of municipalities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Firstly, has a referendum on the merging of municipalities been held in
your municipality during the last couple of years?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
610 |
28.9% |
0.288552507 |
| 2 |
No |
1258 |
59.5% |
0.595080416 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
225 |
10.6% |
0.106433302 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.0% |
0.009933775 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6498 |
|
NA |
r8pad8
|
Variable label:
|
Supporter/opponent of your municipality merging with other
municipalities
|
|
Literal question:
|
How strong a supporter or opponent are you of the municipality you live
in merging with one or more other municipalities?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strong supporter |
141 |
6.7% |
0.06669820 |
| 2 |
Strong supporter |
205 |
9.7% |
0.09697256 |
| 3 |
Fairly strong supporter |
328 |
15.5% |
0.15515610 |
| 4 |
Neither supporter or opponent |
934 |
44.2% |
0.44181646 |
| 5 |
Fairly strong opponent |
241 |
11.4% |
0.11400189 |
| 6 |
Strong opponent |
111 |
5.3% |
0.05250710 |
| 7 |
Very strong opponent |
102 |
4.8% |
0.04824976 |
| 97 |
No answer |
52 |
2.5% |
0.02459792 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6498 |
|
NA |
r8pad9_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=3. Randomly chooses if R8PAD9A_1 or R8PAD9A_2 should be
asked to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3. Randomly chooses if R8PAD9A_1 or R8PAD9A_2 should be
asked to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2108] [Invalid:6504]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD9_1 |
1036 |
49.1% |
0.4914611 |
| 2 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD9_2 |
1072 |
50.9% |
0.5085389 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6504 |
|
NA |
r8pad9a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Referendum merging of municipalities, acceptable decision: Narrow
majority “No”, citizen surveys majority “Yes”, merger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a hypothetical situation where a referendum was conducted on the
merging of municipalities. It turned out that a narrow majority voted
“No” to the merger. At the same time several citizen surveys held over a
period of time had shown a majority in favour of merging. After careful
consideration, the municipal council decides to confirm the merger.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Regardless of your view on the merging of municipalities; to what extent
do you think the municipal council’s decision in this case would be
acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD9_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
82 |
7.9% |
0.07915058 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
219 |
21.1% |
0.21138996 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
333 |
32.1% |
0.32142857 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
234 |
22.6% |
0.22586873 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
139 |
13.4% |
0.13416988 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
2.8% |
0.02799228 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7576 |
|
NA |
r8pad9a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Referendum merging of municipalities, acceptable decision: Narrow
majority “Yes”, citizen surveys majority “Yes”, not merger
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a hypothetical situation where a referendum was conducted on the
merging of municipalities. It turned out that a narrow majority voted
“yes” to the merger. At the same time several citizen surveys held over
a period of time had shown a majority in favour of merging. After
careful consideration, the municipal council decides to remain as a
separate municipality.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Regardless of your view on the merging of municipalities; to what extent
do you think the municipal council’s decision in this case would be
acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD9_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great degree |
38 |
3.5% |
0.03544776 |
| 2 |
To a great degree |
134 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
| 3 |
To some degree |
284 |
26.5% |
0.26492537 |
| 4 |
To a small degree |
396 |
36.9% |
0.36940299 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
197 |
18.4% |
0.18376866 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
2.1% |
0.02145522 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7540 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_order
|
Variable label:
|
[The order of different thematic characteristics was presented for the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
[1 = _comment, 2 = _ethics, 3 = _status, 4 = _readership, 5 =
_established, 6 = _entertainment, 7 = _advertisement, 8 = _party]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8pad2_comment_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Comment section. Characteristic 1 of news source 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has no comments section |
667 |
31.7% |
0.3165638 |
| 2 |
Yes, and journalists participate in the comments section |
692 |
32.8% |
0.3284290 |
| 3 |
Yes, but journalists do not participate in the comments section |
748 |
35.5% |
0.3550071 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_comment_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Comment section. Characteristic 1 of news source 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has no comments section |
683 |
32.4% |
0.3241576 |
| 2 |
Yes, and journalists participate in the comments section |
679 |
32.2% |
0.3222591 |
| 3 |
Yes, but journalists do not participate in the comments section |
745 |
35.4% |
0.3535833 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_ethics_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Number of ethics violations. Characteristic 2 of news source 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No violations |
676 |
32.1% |
0.3208353 |
| 2 |
Few violations |
707 |
33.6% |
0.3355482 |
| 3 |
Many violations |
724 |
34.4% |
0.3436165 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_ethics_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Number of ethics violations. Characteristic 2 of news source 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No violations |
708 |
33.6% |
0.3360228 |
| 2 |
Few violations |
680 |
32.3% |
0.3227337 |
| 3 |
Many violations |
719 |
34.1% |
0.3412435 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_status_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Publication platform. Characteristic 3 of news source 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Website/blog |
717 |
34.0% |
0.3402943 |
| 2 |
Printed and online newspaper |
715 |
33.9% |
0.3393450 |
| 3 |
Online newspaper (no print edition) |
675 |
32.0% |
0.3203607 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_status_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Publication platform. Characteristic 3 of news source 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Website/blog |
690 |
32.7% |
0.3274798 |
| 2 |
Printed and online newspaper |
745 |
35.4% |
0.3535833 |
| 3 |
Online newspaper (no print edition) |
672 |
31.9% |
0.3189369 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_readership_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Readership. Characteristic 4 of news source 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Few readers |
1084 |
51.4% |
0.5144756 |
| 2 |
Many readers |
1023 |
48.6% |
0.4855244 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_readership_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Readership. Characteristic 4 of news source 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Few readers |
1054 |
50.0% |
0.5002373 |
| 2 |
Many readers |
1053 |
50.0% |
0.4997627 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_established_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Publication established. Characteristic 5 of news source 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
About 100 years ago |
703 |
33.4% |
0.3336497 |
| 2 |
About 50 years ago |
707 |
33.6% |
0.3355482 |
| 3 |
About five years ago |
697 |
33.1% |
0.3308021 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_established_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Publication established. Characteristic 5 of news source 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
About 100 years ago |
697 |
33.1% |
0.3308021 |
| 2 |
About 50 years ago |
680 |
32.3% |
0.3227337 |
| 3 |
About five years ago |
730 |
34.6% |
0.3464642 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_entertainment_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Share of entertainment news. Characteristic 6 of news source 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has no entertainment news |
671 |
31.8% |
0.3184623 |
| 2 |
A small proportion of entertainment news |
716 |
34.0% |
0.3398196 |
| 3 |
Mainly entertainment news |
720 |
34.2% |
0.3417181 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_entertainment_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Share of entertainment news. Characteristic 6 of news source 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Has no entertainment news |
690 |
32.7% |
0.3274798 |
| 2 |
A small proportion of entertainment news |
733 |
34.8% |
0.3478880 |
| 3 |
Mainly entertainment news |
684 |
32.5% |
0.3246322 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_advertisement_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Advertisement. Characteristic 7 of news source 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, but does not use advertising that resembles news |
721 |
34.2% |
0.3421927 |
| 2 |
Yes, and use advertising that resembles news |
705 |
33.5% |
0.3345990 |
| 3 |
No |
681 |
32.3% |
0.3232084 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_advertisement_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Advertisement. Characteristic 7 of news source 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes, but does not use advertising that resembles news |
736 |
34.9% |
0.3493118 |
| 2 |
Yes, and use advertising that resembles news |
668 |
31.7% |
0.3170384 |
| 3 |
No |
703 |
33.4% |
0.3336497 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_party_1
|
Variable label:
|
[The editor/owner supports political party. Characteristic 8 of news
source 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
217 |
10.3% |
0.10299003 |
| 2 |
Red |
199 |
9.4% |
0.09444708 |
| 3 |
Socialist Left Party |
189 |
9.0% |
0.08970100 |
| 4 |
Labour Party |
203 |
9.6% |
0.09634551 |
| 5 |
Centre Party |
218 |
10.3% |
0.10346464 |
| 6 |
Green Party |
223 |
10.6% |
0.10583768 |
| 7 |
Liberal Party |
209 |
9.9% |
0.09919317 |
| 8 |
Christian Democratic Party |
207 |
9.8% |
0.09824395 |
| 9 |
Conservative Party |
193 |
9.2% |
0.09159943 |
| 10 |
Progress Party |
249 |
11.8% |
0.11817750 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2_party_2
|
Variable label:
|
[The editor/owner supports political party. Characteristic 8 of news
source 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2107] [Invalid:6505]
[Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
195 |
9.3% |
0.09254865 |
| 2 |
Red |
194 |
9.2% |
0.09207404 |
| 3 |
Socialist Left Party |
189 |
9.0% |
0.08970100 |
| 4 |
Labour Party |
190 |
9.0% |
0.09017561 |
| 5 |
Centre Party |
217 |
10.3% |
0.10299003 |
| 6 |
Green Party |
238 |
11.3% |
0.11295681 |
| 7 |
Liberal Party |
232 |
11.0% |
0.11010916 |
| 8 |
Christian Democratic Party |
229 |
10.9% |
0.10868533 |
| 9 |
Conservative Party |
222 |
10.5% |
0.10536308 |
| 10 |
Progress Party |
201 |
9.5% |
0.09539630 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6505 |
|
NA |
r8pad2
|
Variable label:
|
Which source is the most reliable? [Conjoint experiment]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what makes people trust different
sources of news. Below, we have created two imaginary sources. Please
read the descriptions of both sources carefully and answer the question
below.
[r8pad2_comment_1] [r8pad2_comment_2] [r8pad2_ethics_1]
[r8pad2_ethics_2] [r8pad2_status_1] [r8pad2_status_2]
[r8pad2_readership_1] [r8pad2_readership_2] [r8pad2_established_1]
[r8pad2_established_2] [r8pad2_entertainment_1] [r8pad2_entertainment_2]
[r8pad2_advertisement_1] [r8pad2_advertisement_2] [r8pad2_party_1]
[r8pad2_party_2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say you didn’t have more information than the above. If you had a
choice, which of these two do you think would be the most reliable
source to report the news in a complete, accurate and fair manner?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3. Conjoint experiment. Respondent is exposed to a
description of two news sources. The description contains 8 randomly
chosen characteristics from predefined lists. The characteristics are
orderer in a randomly fashion. The charateristics are collected from
8PAD2_[characteristic]_[1/2]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Source 1 |
1008 |
47.7% |
0.47682119 |
| 2 |
Source 2 |
947 |
44.8% |
0.44796594 |
| 97 |
No answer |
159 |
7.5% |
0.07521287 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6498 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3. Chooses randomly if the respondent should be
asked version 1 (about the person), version 2 (about the cases) or 3
(both).]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3. Chooses randomly if the respondent should be
asked version 1 (about the person), version 2 (about the cases) or 3
(both).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4204] [Invalid:4408]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD3a |
1393 |
33.1% |
0.3313511 |
| 2 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD3b |
1383 |
32.9% |
0.3289724 |
| 3 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD3c |
1428 |
34.0% |
0.3396765 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4408 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_order
|
Variable label:
|
[The order of different thematic characteristics was presented for the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[1 = _gender, 2 = _language, 3 = _knowledge, 4 = _popularity, 5 =
_religion, 6 = _relationship, 7 = pers_party, 8 = _subject, 9 = angle,
10 = case_party]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8pad3_pers_gender_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Gender. Characteristic 1 about hypothetical person 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1419 |
50.3% |
0.5030131 |
| 2 |
Female |
1402 |
49.7% |
0.4969869 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_gender_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Gender. Characteristic 1 about hypothetical person 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1387 |
49.2% |
0.4916696 |
| 2 |
Female |
1434 |
50.8% |
0.5083304 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_language_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Language skills. Characteristic 2 about hypothetical person 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Does not write good Norwegian |
1467 |
52.0% |
0.5200284 |
| 2 |
Writes good Norwegian |
1354 |
48.0% |
0.4799716 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_language_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Language skills. Characteristic 2 about hypothetical person 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Does not write good Norwegian |
1425 |
50.5% |
0.50514 |
| 2 |
Writes good Norwegian |
1396 |
49.5% |
0.49486 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_knowledge_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Knowledge. Characteristic 3 about hypothetical person 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Little knowledge |
1451 |
51.4% |
0.5143566 |
| 2 |
A lot of knowledge |
1370 |
48.6% |
0.4856434 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_knowledge_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Knowledge. Characteristic 3 about hypothetical person 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Little knowledge |
1432 |
50.8% |
0.5076214 |
| 2 |
A lot of knowledge |
1389 |
49.2% |
0.4923786 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_popularity_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Online popularity. Characteristic 4 about hypothetical person 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Few share contributions further |
1393 |
49.4% |
0.4937965 |
| 2 |
Many share contributions further |
1428 |
50.6% |
0.5062035 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_popularity_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Online popularity. Characteristic 4 about hypothetical person 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Few share contributions further |
1360 |
48.2% |
0.4820985 |
| 2 |
Many share contributions further |
1461 |
51.8% |
0.5179015 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_religion_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Religion. Characteristic 5 about hypothetical person 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
941 |
33.4% |
0.3335697 |
| 2 |
Christianity |
957 |
33.9% |
0.3392414 |
| 3 |
Islam |
923 |
32.7% |
0.3271889 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_religion_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Religion. Characteristic 5 about hypothetical person 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
931 |
33.0% |
0.3300248 |
| 2 |
Christianity |
935 |
33.1% |
0.3314428 |
| 3 |
Islam |
955 |
33.9% |
0.3385324 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_relationship_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Relationship. Characteristic 6 about hypothetical person 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
You are close friends |
970 |
34.4% |
0.3438497 |
| 2 |
You've only said hello, but have mutual friends |
930 |
33.0% |
0.3296703 |
| 3 |
You've only said hello (through work or school) |
921 |
32.6% |
0.3264800 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_relationship_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Relationship. Characteristic 6 about hypothetical person 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
You are close friends |
931 |
33.0% |
0.3300248 |
| 2 |
You've only said hello, but have mutual friends |
965 |
34.2% |
0.3420773 |
| 3 |
You've only said hello (through work or school) |
925 |
32.8% |
0.3278979 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_party_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Party affiliation. Characteristic 7 about hypothetical person 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Red |
316 |
11.2% |
0.11201702 |
| 2 |
Socialist Left Party |
333 |
11.8% |
0.11804325 |
| 3 |
Labour Party |
307 |
10.9% |
0.10882666 |
| 4 |
Centre Party |
315 |
11.2% |
0.11166253 |
| 5 |
Green Party |
308 |
10.9% |
0.10918114 |
| 6 |
Liberal Party |
343 |
12.2% |
0.12158809 |
| 7 |
Christian Democratic Party |
323 |
11.4% |
0.11449840 |
| 8 |
Conservative Party |
294 |
10.4% |
0.10421836 |
| 9 |
Progress Party |
282 |
10.0% |
0.09996455 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_pers_party_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Party affiliation. Characteristic 7 about hypothetical person 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2821] [Invalid:5791]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Rødt |
294 |
10.4% |
0.1042184 |
| 2 |
Sosialistisk Venstreparti |
306 |
10.8% |
0.1084722 |
| 3 |
Arbeiderpartiet |
340 |
12.1% |
0.1205246 |
| 4 |
Senterpartiet |
323 |
11.4% |
0.1144984 |
| 5 |
Miljøpartiet De Grønne |
308 |
10.9% |
0.1091811 |
| 6 |
Venstre |
316 |
11.2% |
0.1120170 |
| 7 |
Kristelig Folkeparti |
297 |
10.5% |
0.1052818 |
| 8 |
Høyre |
308 |
10.9% |
0.1091811 |
| 9 |
Fremskrittspartiet |
329 |
11.7% |
0.1166253 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5791 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_case_subject_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Subject discussed. Characteristic 8 about hypothetical person 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2749] [Invalid:5863]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
EU and european politics |
504 |
18.3% |
0.1833394 |
| 2 |
Immigration |
583 |
21.2% |
0.2120771 |
| 3 |
Gay rights |
579 |
21.1% |
0.2106220 |
| 4 |
Economics and tax issues |
541 |
19.7% |
0.1967988 |
| 5 |
Criminal justice and the death penalty |
542 |
19.7% |
0.1971626 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5863 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_case_subject_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Subject discussed. Characteristic 8 about hypothetical person 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2749] [Invalid:5863]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
EU and european politics |
543 |
19.8% |
0.1975264 |
| 2 |
Immigration |
560 |
20.4% |
0.2037104 |
| 3 |
Gay rights |
534 |
19.4% |
0.1942525 |
| 4 |
Economics and tax issues |
561 |
20.4% |
0.2040742 |
| 5 |
Criminal justice and the death penalty |
551 |
20.0% |
0.2004365 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5863 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_case_angle_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Journalistic angle. Characteristic 9 about hypothetical person 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2749] [Invalid:5863]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
You are mostly in agreement with the viewpoint |
922 |
33.5% |
0.3353947 |
| 2 |
You are equally in agreement and disagreement with the viewpoint |
938 |
34.1% |
0.3412150 |
| 3 |
You are mostly in disagreement with the viewpoint |
889 |
32.3% |
0.3233903 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5863 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_case_angle_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Journalistic angle. Characteristic 9 about hypothetical person 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2749] [Invalid:5863]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
You are mostly in agreement with the viewpoint |
914 |
33.2% |
0.3324845 |
| 2 |
You are equally in agreement and disagreement with the viewpoint |
923 |
33.6% |
0.3357585 |
| 3 |
You are mostly in disagreement with the viewpoint |
912 |
33.2% |
0.3317570 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5863 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_case_party_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Party mentioned. Characteristic 10 about hypothetical person 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2749] [Invalid:5863]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Red has been mentioned most |
305 |
11.1% |
0.11094944 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party has been mentioned most |
272 |
9.9% |
0.09894507 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party has been mentioned most |
317 |
11.5% |
0.11531466 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party has been mentioned most |
291 |
10.6% |
0.10585668 |
| 5 |
The Green Party has been mentioned most |
324 |
11.8% |
0.11786104 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party has been mentioned most |
292 |
10.6% |
0.10622044 |
| 7 |
The Christian Democratic Party has been mentioned most |
301 |
10.9% |
0.10949436 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party has been mentioned most |
315 |
11.5% |
0.11458712 |
| 9 |
The Progress Party has been mentioned most |
332 |
12.1% |
0.12077119 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5863 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_case_party_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Party mentioned. Characteristic 10 about hypothetical person 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2749] [Invalid:5863]
[Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Red has been mentioned most |
280 |
10.2% |
0.1018552 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party has been mentioned most |
326 |
11.9% |
0.1185886 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party has been mentioned most |
303 |
11.0% |
0.1102219 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party has been mentioned most |
310 |
11.3% |
0.1127683 |
| 5 |
The Green Party has been mentioned most |
286 |
10.4% |
0.1040378 |
| 6 |
The Liberal Party has been mentioned most |
316 |
11.5% |
0.1149509 |
| 7 |
The Christian Democratic Party has been mentioned most |
292 |
10.6% |
0.1062204 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party has been mentioned most |
321 |
11.7% |
0.1167697 |
| 9 |
The Progress Party has been mentioned most |
315 |
11.5% |
0.1145871 |
| Sysmiss |
|
5863 |
|
NA |
r8pad3_qtext
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly determines the formulation of the question from a group of
two]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3.]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that
dealt with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
[Complete question text: 1 = Let’s say you were forced to read through
the next ten news stories that either of these two share via social
media. If you didn’t have more information than the above, which person
would you choose to get news from?” 2 = “Let’s say you were forced to
have to share the next ten news items distributed by one of these two,
in a way that everyone else you are in contact with via social media can
see that you are sharing these items. If you didn’t have more
information than the above, which person would you choose to recommend
news from?”]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4204] [Invalid:4408]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[...] forced to read through the next ten news stories that either of these two
share [...] |
2138 |
50.9% |
0.5085633 |
| 2 |
[...] forced to have to share the next ten news items distributed by one of
these two [...] |
2066 |
49.1% |
0.4914367 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4408 |
|
NA |
r8pad3a
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment on the use of social media: 7 characteristics about the
persons who share a news item.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We want to study people’s use of social media. It does not matter if
you use social media or not.
Below, we have described two imaginary people. Imagine that they are
two people your own age that you have contact with via social media.
Please read the descriptions of both people carefully and answer the
questions below.
[r8pad3_pers_gender_1] [r8pad3_pers_gender_2]
[r8pad3_pers_language_1] [r8pad3_pers_language_2]
[r8pad3_pers_knowledge_1] [r8pad3_pers_knowledge_2]
[r8pad3_pers_popularity_1] [r8pad3_pers_popularity_2]
[r8pad3_pers_religion_1] [r8pad3_pers_religion_2]
[r8pad3_pers_relationship_1] [r8pad3_pers_relationship_2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r8pad3_qtext]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3 and R8PAD3_ran=1.Respondent is exposed to 7
characteristics about the persons.]
[See appendix for visual example]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Person 1 |
662 |
47.5% |
0.47523331 |
| 2 |
Person 2 |
631 |
45.3% |
0.45297918 |
| 97 |
No answer |
100 |
7.2% |
0.07178751 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7219 |
|
NA |
r8pad3b
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment on the use of social media: 3 characteristics about the news
item that is shared.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We want to study people’s use of social media. It does not matter if
you use social media or not.
Below, we have described two imaginary people. Imagine that they are
two people your own age that you have contact with via social media.
Please read the descriptions of both people carefully and answer the
questions below.
[r8pad3_case_subject_1] [r8pad3_case_subject_2] [r8pad3_case_angle_1]
[r8pad3_case_angle_2] [r8pad3_case_party_1] [r8pad3_case_party_2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r8pad3_qtext]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3 and R8PAD3_ran=2.Respondent is exposed to 3
characteristics about the case.]
[See appendix for visual example]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Person 1 |
658 |
47.6% |
0.47577730 |
| 2 |
Person 2 |
613 |
44.3% |
0.44323933 |
| 97 |
No answer |
112 |
8.1% |
0.08098337 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7229 |
|
NA |
r8pad3c
|
Variable label:
|
Experiment on the use of social media: 10 characteristics about the
person and news item that is shared.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We want to study people’s use of social media. It does not matter if
you use social media or not.
Below, we have described two imaginary people. Imagine that they are
two people your own age that you have contact with via social media.
Please read the descriptions of both people carefully and answer the
questions below.
[r8pad3_pers_gender_1] [r8pad3_pers_gender_2]
[r8pad3_pers_language_1] [r8pad3_pers_language_2]
[r8pad3_pers_knowledge_1] [r8pad3_pers_knowledge_2]
[r8pad3_pers_popularity_1] [r8pad3_pers_popularity_2]
[r8pad3_pers_religion_1] [r8pad3_pers_religion_2]
[r8pad3_pers_relationship_1] [r8pad3_pers_relationship_2]
[r8pad3_pers_party_1] [r8pad3_pers_party_2] [r8pad3_case_subject_1]
[r8pad3_case_subject_2] [r8pad3_case_angle_1] [r8pad3_case_angle_2]
[r8pad3_case_party_1] [r8pad3_case_party_2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
[r8pad3_qtext]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3 and R8PAD3_ran=3.Respondent is exposed to 10
characteristics about the persons and the case.]
[See appendix for visual example]
[Initially, in addition to the other categories, a category that dealt
with how often the hypothetical person “discusses or writes about
politics” should have been included. This was unintentionally omitted
experiment due to a technical error.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Person 1 |
662 |
46.4% |
0.46358543 |
| 2 |
Person 2 |
634 |
44.4% |
0.44397759 |
| 97 |
No answer |
132 |
9.2% |
0.09243697 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7184 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_treatment
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable. Chooses a text that contains/lacks information
about election turnout, size of majority and result. Contact Sveinung
Arnesen or Mikael Johannesson for more information. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Chooses a text that contains/lacks information
about election turnout, size of majority and result. Contact Sveinung
Arnesen or Mikael Johannesson for more information. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4179] [Invalid:4433]
[Range:1-144]
|
r8pad6_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3. Randomly chooses if R8PAD6_1, R8PAD6_2 or
R8PAD6_3 should be asked to the respondent. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3. Randomly chooses if R8PAD6_1, R8PAD6_2 or
R8PAD6_3 should be asked to the respondent. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4179] [Invalid:4433]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD6_1 |
1371 |
32.8% |
0.3280689 |
| 2 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD6_2 |
1417 |
33.9% |
0.3390763 |
| 3 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD6_3 |
1391 |
33.3% |
0.3328547 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4433 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3. Randomly chooses the order of the questions
in the experiment. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=2 or v=3. Randomly chooses the order of the questions
in the experiment. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4179] [Invalid:4433]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Question order 1 |
2060 |
49.3% |
0.4929409 |
| 2 |
Question order 2 |
2119 |
50.7% |
0.5070591 |
| Sysmiss |
|
4433 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_pre_1
|
Variable label:
|
Choice to take in refugees next year
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that there was a new debate on taking in more refugees during
the next year. The choice was to either not take in more than we
currently have today (0 refugees) or to take in more refugees (10,000
refugees).
|
|
Literal question:
|
In such a case, what do you think that the choice should be?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3 and R8PAD6_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 new refugees |
600 |
43.8% |
0.43763676 |
| 2 |
10 000 new refugees |
723 |
52.7% |
0.52735230 |
| 97 |
No answer |
48 |
3.5% |
0.03501094 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7241 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_1a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Mandate government needs: Taking in more refugees, should government
follow result of referendum despite Parliament disagreement? Explanation
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government will need
in order to make important decisions on behalf of the nation.
Imagine that there was a new debate on taking in more refugees during
the next year and that a consultative referendum was held. The yes side
voted that we should take in more refugees (10,000 refugees). The no
side voted that we should not take in more than we already have (0
refugees).
[R8PAD6_treatment]
In such a case, should the government follow the result of the
referendum even though the majority in Parliament disagree?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Before you indicate your choice on the next page (Yes or No), can you
briefly explain why you made your choice?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are looking for all types of answers. A couple of sentences would be
great, or just a few words if it is easier for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3, R8PAD6_ran=1 and R8PAD6_ran2=1.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8pad6_1a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Mandate government needs: Taking in more refugees, should government
follow result of referendum despite Parliament disagreement?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government will need
in order to make important decisions on behalf of the nation.
Imagine that there was a new debate on taking in more refugees during
the next year and that a consultative referendum was held. The yes side
voted that we should take in more refugees (10,000 refugees). The no
side voted that we should not take in more than we already have (0
refugees).
[R8PAD6_treatment]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In such a case, should the government follow the result of the
referendum even though the majority in Parliament disagree?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3, R8PAD6_ran=1 and R8PAD6_ran2=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
414 |
61.3% |
0.61333333 |
| 2 |
No |
232 |
34.4% |
0.34370370 |
| 97 |
No answer |
29 |
4.3% |
0.04296296 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7937 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_1b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Mandate government needs: Taking in more refugees, should government
follow result of referendum despite Parliament disagreement?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government will need
in order to make important decisions on behalf of the nation.
Imagine that there was a new debate on taking in more refugees during
the next year and that a consultative referendum was held. The yes side
voted that we should take in more refugees (10,000 refugees). The no
side voted that we should not take in more than we already have (0
refugees).
[R8PAD6_treatment]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In such a case, should the government follow the result of the
referendum even though the majority in Parliament disagree?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3, R8PAD6_ran=1 and R8PAD6_ran2=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
440 |
63.2% |
0.63218391 |
| 2 |
No |
232 |
33.3% |
0.33333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7916 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_1b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Mandate government needs: Taking in more refugees, should government
follow result of referendum despite Parliament disagreement? Explanation
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government will need
in order to make important decisions on behalf of the nation.
Imagine that there was a new debate on taking in more refugees during
the next year and that a consultative referendum was held. The yes side
voted that we should take in more refugees (10,000 refugees). The no
side voted that we should not take in more than we already have (0
refugees).
[R8PAD6_treatment]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Can you briefly explain why you made the decision you did?
|
|
Post-question:
|
We are looking for all types of answers. A couple of sentences would be
great, or just a few words if it is easier for you.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3, R8PAD6_ran=1 and R8PAD6_ran2=2.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8pad6_pre_2
|
Variable label:
|
Choice to change the county structure in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that there was a new debate about the county structure in Norway
and that the choice was to either change the counties or to keep the
counties as they are today.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In such a case, what do you think you should choose?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3 and R8PAD6_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Keep the counties as they are today |
733 |
51.7% |
0.5172900 |
| 2 |
Change the counties |
635 |
44.8% |
0.4481299 |
| 97 |
No answer |
49 |
3.5% |
0.0345801 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7195 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_2a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Mandate government needs: Change the county structure, should government
follow result of referendum despite Parliament disagreement?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government will need
in order to make important decisions on behalf of the nation.
Imagine that there was a new debate about the county structure in Norway
and that a consultative referendum was held. The yes side voted to
change the counties. The no side voted to continue to keep the counties
as they are today.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[R8PAD6_treatment] Should the government follow the result of the
referendum even though the majority in Parliament disagree?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3, R8PAD6_ran=2 and R8PAD6_ran2=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
458 |
66.0% |
0.65994236 |
| 2 |
No |
217 |
31.3% |
0.31268012 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.7% |
0.02737752 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7918 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_2a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Mandate government needs: Change the county structure, acceptable that
the government follows the result of the referendum?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government will need
in order to make important decisions on behalf of the nation.
Imagine that there was a new debate about the county structure in
Norway and that a consultative referendum was held. The yes side voted
to change the counties. The no side voted to continue to keep the
counties as they are today.
[R8PAD6_treatment] Let’s say that the government chooses to follow the
result of the referendum.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, to what extent do you think it would be acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3, R8PAD6_ran=2 and R8PAD6_ran2=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
144 |
20.7% |
0.20749280 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
321 |
46.3% |
0.46253602 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
136 |
19.6% |
0.19596542 |
| 4 |
Slightly acceptable |
59 |
8.5% |
0.08501441 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
19 |
2.7% |
0.02737752 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
2.2% |
0.02161383 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7918 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_2b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Mandate government needs: Change the county structure, acceptable that
the government follows the result of the referendum?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government will need
in order to make important decisions on behalf of the nation.
Imagine that there was a new debate about the county structure in
Norway and that a consultative referendum was held. The yes side voted
to change the counties. The no side voted to continue to keep the
counties as they are today.
[R8PAD6_treatment] Let’s say that the government chooses to follow the
result of the referendum.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, to what extent do you think it would be acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3, R8PAD6_ran=2 and R8PAD6_ran2=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
156 |
21.6% |
0.21576763 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
337 |
46.6% |
0.46611342 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
111 |
15.4% |
0.15352697 |
| 4 |
Slightly acceptable |
79 |
10.9% |
0.10926694 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
22 |
3.0% |
0.03042877 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.5% |
0.02489627 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7889 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_2b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Mandate government needs: Change the county structure, should government
follow result of referendum despite Parliament disagreement?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government will need
in order to make important decisions on behalf of the nation.
Imagine that there was a new debate about the county structure in Norway
and that a consultative referendum was held. The yes side voted to
change the counties. The no side voted to continue to keep the counties
as they are today.
|
|
Literal question:
|
[R8PAD6_treatment] Should the government follow the result of the
referendum even though the majority in Parliament disagree?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3, R8PAD6_ran=2 and R8PAD6_ran2=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
500 |
69.2% |
0.69156293 |
| 2 |
No |
187 |
25.9% |
0.25864454 |
| 97 |
No answer |
36 |
5.0% |
0.04979253 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7889 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_pre_3
|
Variable label:
|
State obliged to offer new public services, choice between private or
public sector
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the state was obliged to offer a number of new public
services. This led to a debate about who should provide these services.
The choice was between letting the private sector take over these
services or letting the public sector take over those services.
|
|
Literal question:
|
In such a case, what do you think you should choose?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3 and R8PAD6_ran=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The private sector should take over these services |
398 |
28.6% |
0.28612509 |
| 2 |
The public sector should take over these services |
933 |
67.1% |
0.67074047 |
| 97 |
No answer |
60 |
4.3% |
0.04313444 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7221 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_3a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Mandate government needs: Public/private sector take over new services,
should government follow result of referendum despite Parliament
disagreement?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government will need
in order to make important decisions on behalf of the nation.
Imagine that the state was obliged to offer a number of new public
health services. This led to a debate about who should provide these
services and an advisory referendum was held regarding whether they
should come from the private sector. The yes-side voted to let the
private sector take over these services. The no-side voted to allow the
public sector to take over these services.
[R8PAD6_treatment]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the most right thing to do in this situation: Should the
government follow the result of the referendum even though the majority
in Parliament disagree?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3, R8PAD6_ran=3 and R8PAD6_ran2=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
461 |
66.7% |
0.66714906 |
| 2 |
No |
200 |
28.9% |
0.28943560 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
4.3% |
0.04341534 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7921 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_3b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Mandate government needs: Public/private sector take over new services,
acceptable that the government follows the result of the referendum?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government will need
in order to make important decisions on behalf of the nation.
Imagine that the state was obliged to offer a number of new public
health services. This led to a debate about who should provide these
services and an advisory referendum was held regarding whether they
should come from the private sector. The yes-side voted to let the
private sector take over these services. The no-side voted to allow the
public sector to take over these services.
[R8PAD6_treatment]
Let’s say that the government chooses to follow the outcome of the
referendum.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, to what extent do you think it would be acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3, R8PAD6_ran=3 and R8PAD6_ran2=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
125 |
18.1% |
0.18089725 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
345 |
49.9% |
0.49927641 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
116 |
16.8% |
0.16787265 |
| 4 |
Slightly acceptable |
60 |
8.7% |
0.08683068 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
15 |
2.2% |
0.02170767 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
4.3% |
0.04341534 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7921 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_3b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Mandate government needs: Public/private sector take over new services,
acceptable that the government follows the result of the referendum?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government will need
in order to make important decisions on behalf of the nation.
Imagine that the state was obliged to offer a number of new public
health services. This led to a debate about who should provide these
services and an advisory referendum was held regarding whether they
should come from the private sector. The yes-side voted to let the
private sector take over these services. The no-side voted to allow the
public sector to take over these services.
[R8PAD6_treatment]
Let’s say that the government chooses to follow the outcome of the
referendum.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, to what extent do you think it would be acceptable?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3, R8PAD6_ran=3 and R8PAD6_ran2=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very acceptable |
111 |
15.9% |
0.15857143 |
| 2 |
Acceptable |
313 |
44.7% |
0.44714286 |
| 3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
156 |
22.3% |
0.22285714 |
| 4 |
Slightly acceptable |
79 |
11.3% |
0.11285714 |
| 5 |
Not acceptable at all |
22 |
3.1% |
0.03142857 |
| 97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.7% |
0.02714286 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7912 |
|
NA |
r8pad6_3a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Mandate government needs: Public/private sector take over new services,
should government follow result of referendum despite Parliament
disagreement?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in examining what mandate the government will need
in order to make important decisions on behalf of the nation.
Imagine that the state was obliged to offer a number of new public
health services. This led to a debate about who should provide these
services and an advisory referendum was held regarding whether they
should come from the private sector. The yes-side voted to let the
private sector take over these services. The no-side voted to allow the
public sector to take over these services.
[R8PAD6_treatment]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is the most right thing to do in this situation: Should the
government follow the result of the referendum even though the majority
in Parliament disagree?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2 or v=3, R8PAD6_ran=3 and R8PAD6_ran2=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
437 |
62.4% |
0.62428571 |
| 2 |
No |
219 |
31.3% |
0.31285714 |
| 97 |
No answer |
44 |
6.3% |
0.06285714 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7912 |
|
NA |
r8konsp_1
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is statement: Many important things happen in the world,
which the public is never informed about
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. We would like you to tell us how
likely these statements are.
I think that
|
|
Literal question:
|
… many very important things happen in the world, which the public is
never informed about.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0% - Certainly not |
8 |
0.4% |
0.003750586 |
| 2 |
10% - Extremely unlikely |
21 |
1.0% |
0.009845288 |
| 3 |
20% - Very unlikely |
61 |
2.9% |
0.028598218 |
| 4 |
30% - Unlikely |
84 |
3.9% |
0.039381153 |
| 5 |
40% - Somewhat unlikely |
106 |
5.0% |
0.049695265 |
| 6 |
50% - Neither unlikely or likely |
144 |
6.8% |
0.067510549 |
| 7 |
60% - Somewhat likely |
465 |
21.8% |
0.218002813 |
| 8 |
70% - Likely |
332 |
15.6% |
0.155649320 |
| 9 |
80% - Very likely |
312 |
14.6% |
0.146272855 |
| 10 |
90% - Extremely likely |
153 |
7.2% |
0.071729958 |
| 11 |
100% - Certain |
359 |
16.8% |
0.168307548 |
| 97 |
No answer |
88 |
4.1% |
0.041256446 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
r8konsp_2
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is statement: Politicians do not tell us the true motives for
their decisions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. We would like you to tell us how
likely these statements are.
I think that
|
|
Literal question:
|
… politicians usually do not tell us the true motives for their
decisions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0% - Certainly not |
8 |
0.4% |
0.003750586 |
| 2 |
10% - Extremely unlikely |
14 |
0.7% |
0.006563526 |
| 3 |
20% - Very unlikely |
57 |
2.7% |
0.026722925 |
| 4 |
30% - Unlikely |
103 |
4.8% |
0.048288795 |
| 5 |
40% - Somewhat unlikely |
197 |
9.2% |
0.092358181 |
| 6 |
50% - Neither unlikely or likely |
292 |
13.7% |
0.136896390 |
| 7 |
60% - Somewhat likely |
483 |
22.6% |
0.226441632 |
| 8 |
70% - Likely |
318 |
14.9% |
0.149085795 |
| 9 |
80% - Very likely |
286 |
13.4% |
0.134083451 |
| 10 |
90% - Extremely likely |
141 |
6.6% |
0.066104079 |
| 11 |
100% - Certain |
138 |
6.5% |
0.064697609 |
| 97 |
No answer |
96 |
4.5% |
0.045007032 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
r8konsp_3
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is statement: Government agencies closely monitor all
citizens
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. We would like you to tell us how
likely these statements are.
I think that
|
|
Literal question:
|
… government agencies closely monitor all citizens.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0% - Certainly not |
157 |
7.4% |
0.07360525 |
| 2 |
10% - Extremely unlikely |
209 |
9.8% |
0.09798406 |
| 3 |
20% - Very unlikely |
277 |
13.0% |
0.12986404 |
| 4 |
30% - Unlikely |
308 |
14.4% |
0.14439756 |
| 5 |
40% - Somewhat unlikely |
262 |
12.3% |
0.12283169 |
| 6 |
50% - Neither unlikely or likely |
290 |
13.6% |
0.13595874 |
| 7 |
60% - Somewhat likely |
225 |
10.5% |
0.10548523 |
| 8 |
70% - Likely |
122 |
5.7% |
0.05719644 |
| 9 |
80% - Very likely |
96 |
4.5% |
0.04500703 |
| 10 |
90% - Extremely likely |
37 |
1.7% |
0.01734646 |
| 11 |
100% - Certain |
45 |
2.1% |
0.02109705 |
| 97 |
No answer |
105 |
4.9% |
0.04922644 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
r8konsp_4
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is statement: Events which seem to lack a connection often
result of secret activities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. We would like you to tell us how
likely these statements are.
I think that
|
|
Literal question:
|
… events which superficially seem to lack a connection are often the
result of secret activities.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0% - Certainly not |
85 |
4.0% |
0.03984998 |
| 2 |
10% - Extremely unlikely |
165 |
7.7% |
0.07735584 |
| 3 |
20% - Very unlikely |
281 |
13.2% |
0.13173933 |
| 4 |
30% - Unlikely |
223 |
10.5% |
0.10454759 |
| 5 |
40% - Somewhat unlikely |
217 |
10.2% |
0.10173465 |
| 6 |
50% - Neither unlikely or likely |
477 |
22.4% |
0.22362869 |
| 7 |
60% - Somewhat likely |
268 |
12.6% |
0.12564463 |
| 8 |
70% - Likely |
144 |
6.8% |
0.06751055 |
| 9 |
80% - Very likely |
95 |
4.5% |
0.04453821 |
| 10 |
90% - Extremely likely |
41 |
1.9% |
0.01922175 |
| 11 |
100% - Certain |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01359587 |
| 97 |
No answer |
108 |
5.1% |
0.05063291 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
r8konsp_5
|
Variable label:
|
How likely is statement: There are secret organizations that influence
political decisions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. We would like you to tell us how
likely these statements are.
I think that
|
|
Literal question:
|
… there are secret organizations that greatly influence political
decisions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0% - Certainly not |
86 |
4.0% |
0.04031880 |
| 2 |
10% - Extremely unlikely |
180 |
8.4% |
0.08438819 |
| 3 |
20% - Very unlikely |
204 |
9.6% |
0.09563994 |
| 4 |
30% - Unlikely |
208 |
9.8% |
0.09751524 |
| 5 |
40% - Somewhat unlikely |
179 |
8.4% |
0.08391936 |
| 6 |
50% - Neither unlikely or likely |
359 |
16.8% |
0.16830755 |
| 7 |
60% - Somewhat likely |
357 |
16.7% |
0.16736990 |
| 8 |
70% - Likely |
184 |
8.6% |
0.08626348 |
| 9 |
80% - Very likely |
146 |
6.8% |
0.06844820 |
| 10 |
90% - Extremely likely |
51 |
2.4% |
0.02390999 |
| 11 |
100% - Certain |
81 |
3.8% |
0.03797468 |
| 97 |
No answer |
98 |
4.6% |
0.04594468 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
r8konsp6_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Muslims participate in organized, religiously based lies to
hide plan for societal takeover
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please indicate your agreement with the following statements
|
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims participate in organized, religiously based lies to hide a plan
for societal takeover.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly agree |
162 |
7.6% |
0.07594937 |
| 2 |
2 |
107 |
5.0% |
0.05016409 |
| 3 |
3 |
160 |
7.5% |
0.07501172 |
| 4 |
4 |
224 |
10.5% |
0.10501641 |
| 5 |
5 |
241 |
11.3% |
0.11298640 |
| 6 |
6 |
419 |
19.6% |
0.19643694 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly disagree |
700 |
32.8% |
0.32817628 |
| 97 |
No answer |
120 |
5.6% |
0.05625879 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
r8konsp6_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: American politics controlled by Israel
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please indicate your agreement with the following statements
|
|
Literal question:
|
American politics is controlled by Israel.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly agree |
68 |
3.2% |
0.03187998 |
| 2 |
2 |
79 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
| 3 |
3 |
177 |
8.3% |
0.08298172 |
| 4 |
4 |
280 |
13.1% |
0.13127051 |
| 5 |
5 |
268 |
12.6% |
0.12564463 |
| 6 |
6 |
485 |
22.7% |
0.22737928 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly disagree |
649 |
30.4% |
0.30426629 |
| 97 |
No answer |
127 |
6.0% |
0.05954055 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
r8konsp6_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Princess Diana was killed by the British intelligence service
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please indicate your agreement with the following statements
|
|
Literal question:
|
Princess Diana was killed by the British intelligence service.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 - Strongly agree |
84 |
3.9% |
0.03938115 |
| 2 |
2 |
45 |
2.1% |
0.02109705 |
| 3 |
3 |
58 |
2.7% |
0.02719175 |
| 4 |
4 |
286 |
13.4% |
0.13408345 |
| 5 |
5 |
133 |
6.2% |
0.06235349 |
| 6 |
6 |
421 |
19.7% |
0.19737459 |
| 7 |
7 - Strongly disagree |
956 |
44.8% |
0.44819503 |
| 97 |
No answer |
150 |
7.0% |
0.07032349 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
r8konsp_stemt
|
Variable label:
|
Who have you voted for at the last national elections?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Who have you voted for at the last national elections?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
90 |
4.2% |
0.04219409 |
| 2 |
The Conservative Party |
507 |
23.8% |
0.23769339 |
| 3 |
The Progress Party |
198 |
9.3% |
0.09282700 |
| 4 |
The Liberal Party |
131 |
6.1% |
0.06141585 |
| 5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
120 |
5.6% |
0.05625879 |
| 6 |
The Centre Party |
68 |
3.2% |
0.03187998 |
| 7 |
The Green Party |
78 |
3.7% |
0.03656821 |
| 8 |
The Labour Party |
542 |
25.4% |
0.25410220 |
| 9 |
The Red Party |
41 |
1.9% |
0.01922175 |
| 10 |
Other: |
22 |
1.0% |
0.01031411 |
| 11 |
Would not vote |
101 |
4.7% |
0.04735115 |
| 12 |
Not entitled to vote |
130 |
6.1% |
0.06094702 |
| 97 |
No answer |
105 |
4.9% |
0.04922644 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6479 |
|
NA |
r8konsp_stemt_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Who have you voted for at the last national elections? Other [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Who have you voted for at the last national elections?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8pad4_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomiserer hvis v=3. Velger tilfeldig mellom R8PAD4_1A, R8PAD4_1B,
R8PAD4_2A og R8PAD4_2B.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=3. Randomly chooses if R8PAD4_1A, R8PAD4_1B, R8PAD4_2A
or R8PAD4_2B should be asked to the respondent. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2067] [Invalid:6545]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD4_1A |
529 |
25.6% |
0.2559265 |
| 2 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD4_1B |
520 |
25.2% |
0.2515723 |
| 3 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD4_2A |
522 |
25.3% |
0.2525399 |
| 4 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD4_2B |
496 |
24.0% |
0.2399613 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6545 |
|
NA |
r8pad4_1a
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: How democracy works in Norway, five alternatives
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In our efforts to improve the survey, here is a question similar to one
that has already been asked. Do not try to remember how you answered
before but treat the question as if it was completely new.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD4_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
49 |
9.3% |
0.09262760 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
297 |
56.1% |
0.56143667 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
140 |
26.5% |
0.26465028 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
25 |
4.7% |
0.04725898 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
9 |
1.7% |
0.01701323 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.7% |
0.01701323 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8083 |
|
NA |
r8pad4_1b
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: How democracy works in Norway, five alternatives, “Do
not know” added
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In our efforts to improve the survey, here is a question similar to one
that has already been asked. Do not try to remember how you answered
before but treat the question as if it was completely new.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD4_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
40 |
7.7% |
0.076923077 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
286 |
55.0% |
0.550000000 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
139 |
26.7% |
0.267307692 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
32 |
6.2% |
0.061538462 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
11 |
2.1% |
0.021153846 |
| 6 |
Don't know / no opinion |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001923077 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.1% |
0.021153846 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8092 |
|
NA |
r8pad4_2a
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: How democracy works in Norway, four alternatives,
“Somewhat satisfied” removed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In our efforts to improve the survey, here is a question similar to one
that has already been asked. Do not try to remember how you answered
before but treat the question as if it was completely new.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD4_ran=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
67 |
12.8% |
0.128352490 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
365 |
69.9% |
0.699233716 |
| 3 |
Not very satisfied |
79 |
15.1% |
0.151340996 |
| 4 |
Not satisfied at all |
4 |
0.8% |
0.007662835 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.3% |
0.013409962 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8090 |
|
NA |
r8pad4_2b
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: How democracy works in Norway, five alternatives, “Do
not know” added + “Somewhat satisfied” removed
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In our efforts to improve the survey, here is a question similar to one
that has already been asked. Do not try to remember how you answered
before but treat the question as if it was completely new.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD4_ran=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
39 |
7.9% |
0.078629032 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
360 |
72.6% |
0.725806452 |
| 3 |
Not very satisfied |
73 |
14.7% |
0.147177419 |
| 4 |
Not satisfied at all |
12 |
2.4% |
0.024193548 |
| 5 |
Don't know / no opinion |
4 |
0.8% |
0.008064516 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.6% |
0.016129032 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8116 |
|
NA |
r8baerg_background1
|
Variable label:
|
Random whether Russia or Denmark is used in the question text.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores information that are merged into the question text of
R8Baerg1-4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2066] [Invalid:6546]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Russia |
1058 |
51.2% |
0.5121007 |
| 2 |
Denmark |
1008 |
48.8% |
0.4878993 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
6546 |
|
NA |
r8baerg_background1_1
|
Variable label:
|
Name of tourist in the question text. Follows the randomization in
R8Baerg_background1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores information that are merged into the question text of
R8Baerg1-4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2066] [Invalid:6546]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Fedorov |
1058 |
51.2% |
0.5121007 |
| 2 |
Nielsen |
1008 |
48.8% |
0.4878993 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
6546 |
|
NA |
r8baerg_background1_2
|
Variable label:
|
Random choice of percentage. Follows the randomization in
R8Baerg_background1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores information that are merged into the question text of
R8Baerg1-4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2066] [Invalid:6546]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
17 % |
1058 |
51.2% |
0.5121007 |
| 2 |
26 % |
1008 |
48.8% |
0.4878993 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
6546 |
|
NA |
r8baerg_background1_3
|
Variable label:
|
Choice of currency. Follows the randomization in R8Baerg_background1.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores information that are merged into the question text of
R8Baerg1-4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2066] [Invalid:6546]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Russian rubel |
1058 |
51.2% |
0.5121007 |
| 2 |
Danish kronen |
1008 |
48.8% |
0.4878993 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
6546 |
|
NA |
r8baerg_background2
|
Variable label:
|
Random what sum is used in the question text.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Stores information that are merged into the question text of
R8Baerg1-4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2066] [Invalid:6546]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
500 |
506 |
24.5% |
0.2449177 |
| 2 |
1000 |
525 |
25.4% |
0.2541142 |
| 3 |
1500 |
508 |
24.6% |
0.2458858 |
| 4 |
3000 |
527 |
25.5% |
0.2550823 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
6546 |
|
NA |
r8baerg1
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose policies that would lead to reduction in exchange rates
that would encourage tourists such as Fedorov/Nielsen to visit Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
In 2015, Norway received 3.6 million foreign visitors. Foreign visitors,
or tourists, alone brought NOK 20 billion into the Norwegian economy in
2015. Volatility in exchange rates in 2007–2015 may have led to the
result that flows of tourists from important tourist countries like
[R8Baerg_background1] have decreased by [R8Baerg_background1_2] between
2007-2015. This is likely in part due to changes to the
[R8Baerg_background1_3] exchange rate. Consider a scenario in which the
exchange rate might change in such a way that would lead to tourists to
more frequently visit Norway. As a hypothetical example, consider the
case of a tourist [R8Baerg_background1_1]. [R8Baerg_background1_1], who
has the following personal characteristics: Is male, 35 years old, and
has University education. Before the exchange rate volatility, the
average amount of money he planned on spending while in Norway daily was
NOK [R8Baerg_background2].
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were consulted on your opinion, would you support or oppose
economic policies that would lead to a reduction in the exchange rate
that would encourage more tourists such as [R8Baerg_background1_1] to
visit Norway more frequently?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly support |
23 |
1.1% |
0.01087985 |
| 2 |
Support |
235 |
11.1% |
0.11116367 |
| 3 |
Neutral |
972 |
46.0% |
0.45979186 |
| 4 |
Oppose |
476 |
22.5% |
0.22516556 |
| 5 |
Strongly oppose |
124 |
5.9% |
0.05865658 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
200 |
9.5% |
0.09460738 |
| 97 |
No answer |
84 |
4.0% |
0.03973510 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6498 |
|
NA |
r8baerg2
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose policies that would lead to reduction in exchange rates
to encourage tourists from Russia/Denmark to visit Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Tourists from [R8Baerg_background1] belong to the top 11 countries
visiting Norway.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If you were consulted on your opinion, would you support or oppose
economic policies that would lead to a reduction in the exchange rate,
so as to encourage more tourists from [R8Baerg_background1] to visit
Norway ?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly support |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005203406 |
| 2 |
Support |
191 |
9.0% |
0.090350047 |
| 3 |
Neutral |
889 |
42.1% |
0.420529801 |
| 4 |
Oppose |
593 |
28.1% |
0.280510880 |
| 5 |
Strongly oppose |
160 |
7.6% |
0.075685904 |
| 6 |
Do not know |
172 |
8.1% |
0.081362346 |
| 97 |
No answer |
98 |
4.6% |
0.046357616 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6498 |
|
NA |
r8baerg3
|
Variable label:
|
Rank diplomatic relationship between Norway and Russia/Denmark
|
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being the most negative and 10 being the
most positive, how would you rank the diplomatic relationship between
Norway and [R8Baerg_background1] at the moment?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:0-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
0 |
20 |
0.9% |
0.009460738 |
| 1 |
1 |
40 |
1.9% |
0.018921476 |
| 2 |
2 |
120 |
5.7% |
0.056764428 |
| 3 |
3 |
266 |
12.6% |
0.125827815 |
| 4 |
4 |
221 |
10.5% |
0.104541154 |
| 5 |
5 |
322 |
15.2% |
0.152317881 |
| 6 |
6 |
139 |
6.6% |
0.065752129 |
| 7 |
7 |
168 |
7.9% |
0.079470199 |
| 8 |
8 |
243 |
11.5% |
0.114947966 |
| 9 |
9 |
250 |
11.8% |
0.118259224 |
| 10 |
10 |
213 |
10.1% |
0.100756859 |
| 97 |
No answer |
112 |
5.3% |
0.052980132 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6498 |
|
NA |
r8baerg4
|
Variable label:
|
Change on loan in foreign currency if the NOK depreciates
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Suppose that a friend has taken a loan in foreign currency .
|
|
Literal question:
|
If the exchange rate of the NOK depreciates against the foreign
currency, how does this change the amount of the NOK he or she needs to
pay back?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Increases the amount |
1536 |
72.7% |
0.72658467 |
| 1 |
Amount stays the same |
90 |
4.3% |
0.04257332 |
| 2 |
Decreases the amount |
173 |
8.2% |
0.08183538 |
| 3 |
I don't know |
206 |
9.7% |
0.09744560 |
| 97 |
No answer |
109 |
5.2% |
0.05156102 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6498 |
|
NA |
r8pad5_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable. Randomly chooses if R8PAD5a-c should be asked to
the respondent.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Randomly chooses if R8PAD5a-c should be asked to
the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2053] [Invalid:6559]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD5a |
664 |
32.3% |
0.3234291 |
| 2 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD5b |
665 |
32.4% |
0.3239162 |
| 3 |
Respondent is asked R8PAD5c |
724 |
35.3% |
0.3526547 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6559 |
|
NA |
r8pad5_ranterning
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable. Stores information that are merged into the
question text of R8PAD5.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores information that are merged into the
question text of R8PAD5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2053] [Invalid:6559]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1 |
337 |
16.4% |
0.1641500 |
| 2 |
2 |
338 |
16.5% |
0.1646371 |
| 3 |
3 |
340 |
16.6% |
0.1656113 |
| 4 |
4 |
356 |
17.3% |
0.1734048 |
| 5 |
5 |
317 |
15.4% |
0.1544082 |
| 6 |
6 |
365 |
17.8% |
0.1777886 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6559 |
|
NA |
r8pad5a_1
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, reporting dice: Report number 1 (Earns NOK 100)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns”.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 1 (Earns NOK 100)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=1.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
157 |
23.6% |
0.2364458 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
68 |
10.2% |
0.1024096 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
114 |
17.2% |
0.1716867 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
146 |
22.0% |
0.2198795 |
| 97 |
No answer |
179 |
27.0% |
0.2695783 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7948 |
|
NA |
r8pad5a_2
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, reporting dice: Report number 2 (Earns NOK 200)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns”.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 2 (Earns NOK 200)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=1.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
162 |
24.4% |
0.2439759 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
68 |
10.2% |
0.1024096 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
122 |
18.4% |
0.1837349 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
139 |
20.9% |
0.2093373 |
| 97 |
No answer |
173 |
26.1% |
0.2605422 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7948 |
|
NA |
r8pad5a_3
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, reporting dice: Report number 3 (Earns NOK 300)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns”.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 3 (Earns NOK 300)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=1.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
179 |
27.0% |
0.2695783 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
91 |
13.7% |
0.1370482 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
107 |
16.1% |
0.1611446 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
107 |
16.1% |
0.1611446 |
| 97 |
No answer |
180 |
27.1% |
0.2710843 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7948 |
|
NA |
r8pad5a_4
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, reporting dice: Report number 4 (Earns NOK 400)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns”.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 4 (Earns NOK 400)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=1.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
213 |
32.1% |
0.3207831 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
81 |
12.2% |
0.1219880 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
92 |
13.9% |
0.1385542 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
104 |
15.7% |
0.1566265 |
| 97 |
No answer |
174 |
26.2% |
0.2620482 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7948 |
|
NA |
r8pad5a_5
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, reporting dice: Report number 5 (Earns NOK 500)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns”.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 5 (Earns NOK 500)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=1.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
253 |
38.1% |
0.3810241 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
75 |
11.3% |
0.1129518 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
72 |
10.8% |
0.1084337 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
89 |
13.4% |
0.1340361 |
| 97 |
No answer |
175 |
26.4% |
0.2635542 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7948 |
|
NA |
r8pad5a_6
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, reporting dice: Report number 6 (Earns NOK 600)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns”.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 6 (Earns NOK 600)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=1.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
296 |
44.6% |
0.44578313 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
59 |
8.9% |
0.08885542 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
43 |
6.5% |
0.06475904 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
93 |
14.0% |
0.14006024 |
| 97 |
No answer |
173 |
26.1% |
0.26054217 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7948 |
|
NA |
r8pad5b_1
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, honestly reporting dice: Report number 1 (Earns NOK
100)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns. Person
A is requested to report honestly”.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 1 (Earns NOK 100)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=2.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
206 |
31.0% |
0.3097744 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
73 |
11.0% |
0.1097744 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
102 |
15.3% |
0.1533835 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
149 |
22.4% |
0.2240602 |
| 97 |
No answer |
135 |
20.3% |
0.2030075 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7947 |
|
NA |
r8pad5b_2
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, honestly reporting dice: Report number 2 (Earns NOK
200)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns. Person
A is requested to report honestly”.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 2 (Earns NOK 200)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=2.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
198 |
29.8% |
0.2977444 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
83 |
12.5% |
0.1248120 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
100 |
15.0% |
0.1503759 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
144 |
21.7% |
0.2165414 |
| 97 |
No answer |
140 |
21.1% |
0.2105263 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7947 |
|
NA |
r8pad5b_3
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, honestly reporting dice: Report number 3 (Earns NOK
300)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns. Person
A is requested to report honestly”.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 3 (Earns NOK 300)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=2.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
200 |
30.1% |
0.3007519 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
84 |
12.6% |
0.1263158 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
96 |
14.4% |
0.1443609 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
148 |
22.3% |
0.2225564 |
| 97 |
No answer |
137 |
20.6% |
0.2060150 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7947 |
|
NA |
r8pad5b_4
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, honestly reporting dice: Report number 4 (Earns NOK
400)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns. Person
A is requested to report honestly”.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 4 (Earns NOK 400)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=2.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
230 |
34.6% |
0.3458647 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
75 |
11.3% |
0.1127820 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
79 |
11.9% |
0.1187970 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
135 |
20.3% |
0.2030075 |
| 97 |
No answer |
146 |
22.0% |
0.2195489 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7947 |
|
NA |
r8pad5b_5
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, honestly reporting dice: Report number 5 (Earns NOK
500)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns. Person
A is requested to report honestly”.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 5 (Earns NOK 500)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=2.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
280 |
42.1% |
0.42105263 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
76 |
11.4% |
0.11428571 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
55 |
8.3% |
0.08270677 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
108 |
16.2% |
0.16240602 |
| 97 |
No answer |
146 |
22.0% |
0.21954887 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7947 |
|
NA |
r8pad5b_6
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, honestly reporting dice: Report number 6 (Earns NOK
600)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment.
The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns. Person
A is requested to report honestly”.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 6 (Earns NOK 600)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=2.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
316 |
47.5% |
0.47518797 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
53 |
8.0% |
0.07969925 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
40 |
6.0% |
0.06015038 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
114 |
17.1% |
0.17142857 |
| 97 |
No answer |
142 |
21.4% |
0.21353383 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7947 |
|
NA |
r8pad5c_1
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, untruthfully reporting dice: Report number 1 (Earns
NOK 100)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment. The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns. Person
A is requested to report untruthfully.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 1 (Earns NOK 100)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=3.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
195 |
26.9% |
0.2693370 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
81 |
11.2% |
0.1118785 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
111 |
15.3% |
0.1533149 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
195 |
26.9% |
0.2693370 |
| 97 |
No answer |
142 |
19.6% |
0.1961326 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7888 |
|
NA |
r8pad5c_2
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, untruthfully reporting dice: Report number 2 (Earns
NOK 200)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment. The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns. Person
A is requested to report untruthfully.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 2 (Earns NOK 200)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=3.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
182 |
25.1% |
0.2513812 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
107 |
14.8% |
0.1477901 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
123 |
17.0% |
0.1698895 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
171 |
23.6% |
0.2361878 |
| 97 |
No answer |
141 |
19.5% |
0.1947514 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7888 |
|
NA |
r8pad5c_3
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, untruthfully reporting dice: Report number 3 (Earns
NOK 300)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment. The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns. Person
A is requested to report untruthfully.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 3 (Earns NOK 300)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=3.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
189 |
26.1% |
0.2610497 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
108 |
14.9% |
0.1491713 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
140 |
19.3% |
0.1933702 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
147 |
20.3% |
0.2030387 |
| 97 |
No answer |
140 |
19.3% |
0.1933702 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7888 |
|
NA |
r8pad5c_4
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, untruthfully reporting dice: Report number 4 (Earns
NOK 400)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment. The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns. Person
A is requested to report untruthfully.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 4 (Earns NOK 400)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=3.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
191 |
26.4% |
0.2638122 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
120 |
16.6% |
0.1657459 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
132 |
18.2% |
0.1823204 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
139 |
19.2% |
0.1919890 |
| 97 |
No answer |
142 |
19.6% |
0.1961326 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7888 |
|
NA |
r8pad5c_5
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, untruthfully reporting dice: Report number 5 (Earns
NOK 500)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment. The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns. Person
A is requested to report untruthfully.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 5 (Earns NOK 500)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=3.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
248 |
34.3% |
0.3425414 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
106 |
14.6% |
0.1464088 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
93 |
12.8% |
0.1284530 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
136 |
18.8% |
0.1878453 |
| 97 |
No answer |
141 |
19.5% |
0.1947514 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7888 |
|
NA |
r8pad5c_6
|
Variable label:
|
Socially acceptable, untruthfully reporting dice: Report number 6 (Earns
NOK 600)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You should now evaluate the choices a “person A” is faced with in a
hypothetical situation. Four participants in the Citizen Panel are
randomly selected and will receive NOK 500 if they have evaluated one of
the choices by person A similarly to the majority of the participants in
this experiment. The hypothetical situation is as follows:
“Person A throws a dice and gets the number [R8PAD5_ranTerning].
Person A will then report the number the dice shows. The number reported
is multiplied by NOK 100 and determines how much person A earns. Person
A is requested to report untruthfully.
The table below shows the numbers person A can choose to report. Please
indicate how socially acceptable you think each of the six choices for
person A are.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Report number 6 (Earns NOK 600)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=3 and R8PAD5_ran=3.]
[See appendix for visual example]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
299 |
41.3% |
0.41298343 |
| 2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
104 |
14.4% |
0.14364641 |
| 3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
61 |
8.4% |
0.08425414 |
| 4 |
Very socially acceptable |
126 |
17.4% |
0.17403315 |
| 97 |
No answer |
134 |
18.5% |
0.18508287 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7888 |
|
NA |
r8pid_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feels affinity for: The Labour Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some feel more affinity for individual political parties than the
others. Does this apply to you?
Yes, I feel a sense of belonging to:
Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
752 |
35.2% |
0.3515661524 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009350164 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1385 |
64.7% |
0.6474988312 |
r8pid_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feels affinity for: The Conservative Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some feel more affinity for individual political parties than the
others. Does this apply to you?
Yes, I feel a sense of belonging to:
Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Conservative Party |
587 |
27.4% |
0.2744273025 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009350164 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1550 |
72.5% |
0.7246376812 |
r8pid_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feels affinity for: The Progress Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some feel more affinity for individual political parties than the
others. Does this apply to you?
Yes, I feel a sense of belonging to:
Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Progress Party |
285 |
13.3% |
0.1332398317 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009350164 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1852 |
86.6% |
0.8658251519 |
r8pid_4
|
Variable label:
|
Feels affinity for: The Centre Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some feel more affinity for individual political parties than the
others. Does this apply to you?
Yes, I feel a sense of belonging to:
Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Centre Party |
292 |
13.7% |
0.1365123890 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009350164 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1845 |
86.3% |
0.8625525947 |
r8pid_5
|
Variable label:
|
Feels affinity for: The Christian Democrats
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some feel more affinity for individual political parties than the
others. Does this apply to you?
Yes, I feel a sense of belonging to:
Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Christian Democrats |
157 |
7.3% |
0.0733987845 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009350164 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1980 |
92.6% |
0.9256661992 |
r8pid_6
|
Variable label:
|
Feels affinity for: The Liberal Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some feel more affinity for individual political parties than the
others. Does this apply to you?
Yes, I feel a sense of belonging to:
Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Liberal Party |
221 |
10.3% |
0.1033193081 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009350164 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1916 |
89.6% |
0.8957456755 |
r8pid_7
|
Variable label:
|
Feels affinity for: The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some feel more affinity for individual political parties than the
others. Does this apply to you?
Yes, I feel a sense of belonging to:
Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Socialist Left Party |
281 |
13.1% |
0.1313697990 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009350164 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1856 |
86.8% |
0.8676951847 |
r8pid_8
|
Variable label:
|
Feels affinity for: The Green Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some feel more affinity for individual political parties than the
others. Does this apply to you?
Yes, I feel a sense of belonging to:
Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Green Party |
216 |
10.1% |
0.1009817672 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009350164 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1921 |
89.8% |
0.8980832165 |
r8pid_9
|
Variable label:
|
Feels affinity for: The Red Party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some feel more affinity for individual political parties than the
others. Does this apply to you?
Yes, I feel a sense of belonging to:
Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
133 |
6.2% |
0.0621785881 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009350164 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2004 |
93.7% |
0.9368863955 |
r8pid_10
|
Variable label:
|
Feels affinity for: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some feel more affinity for individual political parties than the
others. Does this apply to you?
Yes, I feel a sense of belonging to:
Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other: |
31 |
1.4% |
0.0144927536 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009350164 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2106 |
98.5% |
0.9845722300 |
r8pid_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Feels affinity for: Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some feel more affinity for individual political parties than the
others. Does this apply to you?
Yes, I feel a sense of belonging to:
Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8pid_11
|
Variable label:
|
Feels affinity for: No political party
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some feel more affinity for individual political parties than the
others. Does this apply to you?
Yes, I feel a sense of belonging to:
Several answers are possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
No, I do not feel a sense of belonging to any of the political parties
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No, I do not feel a sense of belonging to any of the political parties |
506 |
23.7% |
0.2365591398 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009350164 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1631 |
76.3% |
0.7625058439 |
r8mi1_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=4. Randomly chooses if R8MI1_1 or R8MI1_2 should be
asked to the respondent. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=4. Randomly chooses if R8MI1_1 or R8MI1_2 should be
asked to the respondent. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2137] [Invalid:6475]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Asked R8M1_1. |
1048 |
49.0% |
0.4904071 |
| 2 |
Asked R8M1_2. |
1089 |
51.0% |
0.5095929 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6475 |
|
NA |
r8mi1_1
|
Variable label:
|
How many of four suggestions do you support?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You are asked now to read the following suggestions. Afterwards, we
would like to know how many of the suggestions you support. We do not
want you to disclose which proposals you support, just how many.
Spend more money on care for the elderly Sending Norwegian troops to
Syria to help topple President Bashar al-Assad Make it easier for
foreigners to come to Norway Allow Turkey to become a member of the EU
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many of these proposals do you support?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI1_ran=1.The list of suggestions is presented in a
randomized order.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
52 |
5.0% |
0.049618321 |
| 2 |
1 |
574 |
54.8% |
0.547709924 |
| 3 |
2 |
332 |
31.7% |
0.316793893 |
| 4 |
3 |
70 |
6.7% |
0.066793893 |
| 5 |
4 |
12 |
1.1% |
0.011450382 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
0.8% |
0.007633588 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7564 |
|
NA |
r8mi1_2
|
Variable label:
|
How many of five suggestions do you support?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
You are asked now to read the following suggestions. Afterwards, we
would like to know how many of the suggestions you support. We do not
want you to disclose which proposals you support, just how many.
Spend more money on care for the elderly Sending Norwegian troops to
Syria to help topple President Bashar al-Assad Make it easier for
foreigners to come to Norway Allow Turkey to become a member of the EU
Prohibit the use of headscarves that covers the face
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many of these proposals do you support?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI1_ran=2.The list of suggestions is presented in a
randomized order.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 |
35 |
3.2% |
0.032139578 |
| 2 |
1 |
240 |
22.0% |
0.220385675 |
| 3 |
2 |
554 |
50.9% |
0.508723600 |
| 4 |
3 |
210 |
19.3% |
0.192837466 |
| 5 |
4 |
29 |
2.7% |
0.026629936 |
| 6 |
5 |
8 |
0.7% |
0.007346189 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.2% |
0.011937557 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7523 |
|
NA |
r8dvby1
|
Variable label:
|
How safe/unsafe do you feel your local area is?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider your local area.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How safe or unsafe do you feel it is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and u!=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very safe |
764 |
41.0% |
0.410311493 |
| 2 |
Safe |
905 |
48.6% |
0.486036520 |
| 3 |
Somewhat safe |
96 |
5.2% |
0.051557465 |
| 4 |
Neither safe nor unsafe |
33 |
1.8% |
0.017722879 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unsafe |
38 |
2.0% |
0.020408163 |
| 6 |
Unsafe |
12 |
0.6% |
0.006444683 |
| 7 |
Very unsafe |
7 |
0.4% |
0.003759398 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.4% |
0.003759398 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6750 |
|
NA |
r8mi2_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomiserer hvis v=4. Velger tilfeldig mellom R8MI2_a, R8MI2_b,
R8MI2_c og R8MI2_d.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=4. Randomly chooses if R8MI2_a, R8MI2_b, R8MI2_c or
R8MI2_d should be asked to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2131] [Invalid:6481]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Asked R8MI2_a |
549 |
25.8% |
0.2576255 |
| 2 |
Asked R8MI2_b |
530 |
24.9% |
0.2487095 |
| 3 |
Asked R8MI2_c |
537 |
25.2% |
0.2519944 |
| 4 |
Asked R8MI2_d |
515 |
24.2% |
0.2416706 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6481 |
|
NA |
r8mi2_a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Best for region that only people with the same
ethnic/religious backgrounds participate in committee
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you have been selected to participate in a regional
committee that will find solutions to challenges related to the
development of your region.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is best for the region
that only people who share the same ethnic and religious backgrounds
participate in the committee?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI2_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
25 |
4.6% |
0.045537341 |
| 2 |
Agree |
29 |
5.3% |
0.052823315 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
47 |
8.6% |
0.085610200 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
76 |
13.8% |
0.138433515 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
65 |
11.8% |
0.118397086 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
159 |
29.0% |
0.289617486 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
144 |
26.2% |
0.262295082 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.7% |
0.007285974 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8063 |
|
NA |
r8mi2_b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Best for region that only people with a long experience
of living in the region participate in committee
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you have been selected to participate in a regional
committee that will find solutions to challenges related to the
development of your region.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is best for the region
that only people with a long experience of living in the region
participate in the committee?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI2_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
25 |
4.7% |
0.04716981 |
| 2 |
Agree |
68 |
12.8% |
0.12830189 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
122 |
23.0% |
0.23018868 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
77 |
14.5% |
0.14528302 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
84 |
15.8% |
0.15849057 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
114 |
21.5% |
0.21509434 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
5.8% |
0.05849057 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.7% |
0.01698113 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8082 |
|
NA |
r8mi2_c
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Best for region that people with different
ethnic/religious backgrounds participate in committee
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you have been selected to participate in a regional
committee that will find solutions to challenges related to the
development of your region.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is best for the region
that people with different ethnic and religious backgrounds participate
in the committee
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI2_ran=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
106 |
19.7% |
0.19739292 |
| 2 |
Agree |
198 |
36.9% |
0.36871508 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
109 |
20.3% |
0.20297952 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
56 |
10.4% |
0.10428305 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
29 |
5.4% |
0.05400372 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
21 |
3.9% |
0.03910615 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
2.6% |
0.02607076 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.7% |
0.00744879 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8075 |
|
NA |
r8mi2_d
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Best for region that people with different
ethnic/religious backgrounds must be in complete agreement about
proposals to committee
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you have been selected to participate in a regional
committee that will find solutions to challenges related to the
development of your region.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is best for the region
that people with different ethnic and religious backgrounds must be in
complete agreement about the proposals to the committee?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI2_ran=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
24 |
4.7% |
0.04660194 |
| 2 |
Agree |
120 |
23.3% |
0.23300971 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
129 |
25.0% |
0.25048544 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
91 |
17.7% |
0.17669903 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
68 |
13.2% |
0.13203883 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
57 |
11.1% |
0.11067961 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
20 |
3.9% |
0.03883495 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.2% |
0.01165049 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8097 |
|
NA |
r8dv5
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and u!=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very great advantage |
63 |
3.4% |
0.033852767 |
| 2 |
Great advantage |
279 |
15.0% |
0.149919398 |
| 3 |
Slightly advantageous |
711 |
38.2% |
0.382052660 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
281 |
15.1% |
0.150994089 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
348 |
18.7% |
0.186996239 |
| 6 |
A great disadvantage |
118 |
6.3% |
0.063406771 |
| 7 |
Very great disadvantage |
57 |
3.1% |
0.030628694 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002149382 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6751 |
|
NA |
r8dv6
|
Variable label:
|
How important is immigration policy to you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and u!=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
224 |
12.1% |
0.120819849 |
| 2 |
Important |
715 |
38.6% |
0.385652643 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
659 |
35.5% |
0.355447681 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
200 |
10.8% |
0.107874865 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
41 |
2.2% |
0.022114347 |
| 97 |
No answer |
15 |
0.8% |
0.008090615 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r8dv7
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which political party has the best immigration policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and u!=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
328 |
18.1% |
0.181215470 |
| 2 |
The Progress Party |
433 |
23.9% |
0.239226519 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party |
275 |
15.2% |
0.151933702 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
150 |
8.3% |
0.082872928 |
| 5 |
The Centre Party |
50 |
2.8% |
0.027624309 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democrats |
88 |
4.9% |
0.048618785 |
| 7 |
The Liberal party |
60 |
3.3% |
0.033149171 |
| 8 |
The Red Party |
30 |
1.7% |
0.016574586 |
| 9 |
The Green Party |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007734807 |
| 10 |
Other, please specify |
27 |
1.5% |
0.014917127 |
| 11 |
None |
335 |
18.5% |
0.185082873 |
| 97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.1% |
0.011049724 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6802 |
|
NA |
r8dv7_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy, other [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which political party has the best immigration policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and u!=4.]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8mi3_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=4. Randomly chooses if R8MI3_a-R8MI3_l should be asked
to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=4. Randomly chooses if R8MI3_a-R8MI3_l should be asked
to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2123] [Invalid:6489]
[Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Asked R8MI3_a |
168 |
7.9% |
0.07913330 |
| 2 |
Asked R8MI3_b |
182 |
8.6% |
0.08572774 |
| 3 |
Asked R8MI3_c |
167 |
7.9% |
0.07866227 |
| 4 |
Asked R8MI3_d |
172 |
8.1% |
0.08101743 |
| 5 |
Asked R8MI3_e |
176 |
8.3% |
0.08290155 |
| 6 |
Asked R8MI3_f |
199 |
9.4% |
0.09373528 |
| 7 |
Asked R8MI3_g |
187 |
8.8% |
0.08808290 |
| 8 |
Asked R8MI3_h |
155 |
7.3% |
0.07300989 |
| 9 |
Asked R8MI3_i |
171 |
8.1% |
0.08054640 |
| 10 |
Asked R8MI3_j |
174 |
8.2% |
0.08195949 |
| 11 |
Asked R8MI3_k |
191 |
9.0% |
0.08996703 |
| 12 |
Asked R8MI3_l |
181 |
8.5% |
0.08525671 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6489 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_a
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers be allowed to publish letters offensive to
Christians
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers be allowed to publish letters that are
offensive to Christians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
122 |
72.6% |
0.726190476 |
| 2 |
No |
25 |
14.9% |
0.148809524 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
20 |
11.9% |
0.119047619 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.6% |
0.005952381 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8444 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_b
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers be allowed to publish letters offensive to
Jews
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers be allowed to publish letters that are
offensive to Jews?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
60 |
33.0% |
0.3296703 |
| 2 |
No |
86 |
47.3% |
0.4725275 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
36 |
19.8% |
0.1978022 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8430 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_c
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers be allowed to publish letters offensive to
Muslims
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers be allowed to publish letters that are
offensive to Muslims?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_ran=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
118 |
70.7% |
0.70658683 |
| 2 |
No |
27 |
16.2% |
0.16167665 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
20 |
12.0% |
0.11976048 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.2% |
0.01197605 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8445 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_d
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers be allowed to publish letters that express
hatred against Christians
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers be allowed to publish letters that express
hatred against Christians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_ran=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
56 |
32.6% |
0.32558140 |
| 2 |
No |
76 |
44.2% |
0.44186047 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
38 |
22.1% |
0.22093023 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8440 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_e
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers be allowed to publish letters that express
hatred against Jews
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers be allowed to publish letters that express
hatred against Jews?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_ran=5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
16 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
| 2 |
No |
147 |
83.5% |
0.83522727 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
13 |
7.4% |
0.07386364 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8436 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_f
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers be allowed to publish letters that express
hatred against Muslims
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers be allowed to publish letters that express
hatred against Muslims?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_ran=6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
42 |
21.1% |
0.2110553 |
| 2 |
No |
119 |
59.8% |
0.5979899 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
38 |
19.1% |
0.1909548 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8413 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_g
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers publish letters offensive to Christians
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers publish letters that are offensive to
Christians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_ran=7.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
93 |
49.7% |
0.497326203 |
| 2 |
No |
41 |
21.9% |
0.219251337 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
52 |
27.8% |
0.278074866 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005347594 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8425 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_h
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers publish letters offensive to Jews
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers publish letters that are offensive to Jews?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_ran=8.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
33 |
21.3% |
0.212903226 |
| 2 |
No |
86 |
55.5% |
0.554838710 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
35 |
22.6% |
0.225806452 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.6% |
0.006451613 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8457 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_i
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers publish letters offensive to Muslims
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers publish letters that are offensive to
Muslims?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_ran=9.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
78 |
45.6% |
0.456140351 |
| 2 |
No |
56 |
32.7% |
0.327485380 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
36 |
21.1% |
0.210526316 |
| 97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.6% |
0.005847953 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_j
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers publish letters expressing hatred towards
Christians
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers publish letters expressing hatred towards
Christians?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_ran=10.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
47 |
27.0% |
0.2701149 |
| 2 |
No |
88 |
50.6% |
0.5057471 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
39 |
22.4% |
0.2241379 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8438 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_k
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers publish letters expressing hatred towards
Jews
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers publish letters expressing hatred towards
Jews?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_ran=11.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
11 |
5.8% |
0.05759162 |
| 2 |
No |
157 |
82.2% |
0.82198953 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
23 |
12.0% |
0.12041885 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8421 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_l
|
Variable label:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers publish letters expressing hatred towards
Muslims
|
|
Literal question:
|
Should Norwegian newspapers publish letters expressing hatred towards
Muslims?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_ran=12.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
27 |
14.9% |
0.14917127 |
| 2 |
No |
130 |
71.8% |
0.71823204 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
21 |
11.6% |
0.11602210 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.7% |
0.01657459 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8431 |
|
NA |
r8mi3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Do most people in Norway feel the same way as you about such
contributions?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that most people in Norway feel the same way as you about
such contributions, or do you think that most people have an opposite
view?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI3_a-R8MI3_l=1 or R8MI3_a-R8MI3_l=2. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Most people feel the same way as me |
1373 |
78.9% |
0.78862723 |
| 2 |
Most people have an opposite view |
276 |
15.9% |
0.15852958 |
| 97 |
No answer |
92 |
5.3% |
0.05284319 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6871 |
|
NA |
r8dv29
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Begging should be prohibited in Norway
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and u!=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
387 |
20.8% |
0.208064516 |
| 2 |
Agree |
393 |
21.1% |
0.211290323 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
371 |
19.9% |
0.199462366 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
233 |
12.5% |
0.125268817 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
183 |
9.8% |
0.098387097 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
206 |
11.1% |
0.110752688 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
80 |
4.3% |
0.043010753 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.4% |
0.003763441 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6752 |
|
NA |
r8dvh_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as
Norwegians have
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians
have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and u!=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
112 |
6.1% |
0.060737527 |
| 2 |
Agree |
382 |
20.7% |
0.207158351 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
397 |
21.5% |
0.215292842 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
158 |
8.6% |
0.085683297 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
338 |
18.3% |
0.183297180 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
244 |
13.2% |
0.132321041 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
196 |
10.6% |
0.106290672 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
0.9% |
0.009219089 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6768 |
|
NA |
r8mi4_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=4. Randomly chooses if R8MI4_a-R8MI4_f should be asked
to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=4. Randomly chooses if R8MI4_a-R8MI4_f should be asked
to the respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2123] [Invalid:6489]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Asked R8MI4_a |
318 |
15.0% |
0.1497880 |
| 2 |
Asked R8MI4_b |
367 |
17.3% |
0.1728686 |
| 3 |
Asked R8MI4_c |
375 |
17.7% |
0.1766368 |
| 4 |
Asked R8MI4_d |
321 |
15.1% |
0.1512011 |
| 5 |
Asked R8MI4_e |
344 |
16.2% |
0.1620349 |
| 6 |
Asked R8MI4_f |
398 |
18.7% |
0.1874706 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6489 |
|
NA |
r8mi4_a
|
Variable label:
|
Trust/mistrust: Wish to be part of our society, Muslim extremists
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you trust or mistrust Muslim extremists when they say that
they wish to be part of our society?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI4_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly trust |
3 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
| 2 |
Trust |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003144654 |
| 3 |
Somewhat trust |
14 |
4.4% |
0.044025157 |
| 4 |
Neither trust nor mistrust |
22 |
6.9% |
0.069182390 |
| 5 |
Somewhat mistrust |
57 |
17.9% |
0.179245283 |
| 6 |
Mistrust |
109 |
34.3% |
0.342767296 |
| 7 |
Strongly mistrust |
109 |
34.3% |
0.342767296 |
| 97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8294 |
|
NA |
r8mi4_b
|
Variable label:
|
Trust/mistrust: Wish to be part of our society, Muslim religious leaders
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you trust or mistrust Muslim religious leaders when they say
that they wish to be part of our society?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI4_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly trust |
4 |
1.1% |
0.01089918 |
| 2 |
Trust |
33 |
9.0% |
0.08991826 |
| 3 |
Somewhat trust |
78 |
21.3% |
0.21253406 |
| 4 |
Neither trust nor mistrust |
61 |
16.6% |
0.16621253 |
| 5 |
Somewhat mistrust |
79 |
21.5% |
0.21525886 |
| 6 |
Mistrust |
62 |
16.9% |
0.16893733 |
| 7 |
Strongly mistrust |
46 |
12.5% |
0.12534060 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.1% |
0.01089918 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8245 |
|
NA |
r8mi4_c
|
Variable label:
|
Trust/mistrust: Wish to be part of our society, Muslim leaders
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you trust or mistrust Muslim leaders when they say that they
wish to be part of our society?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI4_ran=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly trust |
4 |
1.1% |
0.01066667 |
| 2 |
Trust |
50 |
13.3% |
0.13333333 |
| 3 |
Somewhat trust |
86 |
22.9% |
0.22933333 |
| 4 |
Neither trust nor mistrust |
54 |
14.4% |
0.14400000 |
| 5 |
Somewhat mistrust |
77 |
20.5% |
0.20533333 |
| 6 |
Mistrust |
51 |
13.6% |
0.13600000 |
| 7 |
Strongly mistrust |
48 |
12.8% |
0.12800000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.3% |
0.01333333 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8237 |
|
NA |
r8mi4_d
|
Variable label:
|
Trust/mistrust: Wish to be part of our society, Muslim local politicians
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you trust or mistrust Muslim local politicians when they say
that they wish to be part of our society?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI4_ran=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly trust |
11 |
3.4% |
0.03426791 |
| 2 |
Trust |
108 |
33.6% |
0.33644860 |
| 3 |
Somewhat trust |
80 |
24.9% |
0.24922118 |
| 4 |
Neither trust nor mistrust |
45 |
14.0% |
0.14018692 |
| 5 |
Somewhat mistrust |
40 |
12.5% |
0.12461059 |
| 6 |
Mistrust |
23 |
7.2% |
0.07165109 |
| 7 |
Strongly mistrust |
12 |
3.7% |
0.03738318 |
| 97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.6% |
0.00623053 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8291 |
|
NA |
r8mi4_e
|
Variable label:
|
Trust/mistrust: Wish to be part of our society, female Muslim leaders
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you trust or mistrust female Muslim leaders when they say
that they wish to be part of our society?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI4_ran=5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly trust |
26 |
7.6% |
0.07558140 |
| 2 |
Trust |
97 |
28.2% |
0.28197674 |
| 3 |
Somewhat trust |
78 |
22.7% |
0.22674419 |
| 4 |
Neither trust nor mistrust |
62 |
18.0% |
0.18023256 |
| 5 |
Somewhat mistrust |
45 |
13.1% |
0.13081395 |
| 6 |
Mistrust |
19 |
5.5% |
0.05523256 |
| 7 |
Strongly mistrust |
11 |
3.2% |
0.03197674 |
| 97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.7% |
0.01744186 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8268 |
|
NA |
r8mi4_f
|
Variable label:
|
Trust/mistrust: Wish to be part of our society, Muslims
|
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you trust or mistrust Muslims when they say that they wish
to be part of our society?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI4_ran=6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly trust |
18 |
4.5% |
0.04522613 |
| 2 |
Trust |
99 |
24.9% |
0.24874372 |
| 3 |
Somewhat trust |
107 |
26.9% |
0.26884422 |
| 4 |
Neither trust nor mistrust |
50 |
12.6% |
0.12562814 |
| 5 |
Somewhat mistrust |
56 |
14.1% |
0.14070352 |
| 6 |
Mistrust |
35 |
8.8% |
0.08793970 |
| 7 |
Strongly mistrust |
28 |
7.0% |
0.07035176 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.3% |
0.01256281 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8214 |
|
NA |
r8mi5_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=4. Randomly chooses if R8MI5_a-f should be asked to the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=4. Randomly chooses if R8MI5_a-f should be asked to the
respondent.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2123] [Invalid:6489]
[Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Respondent is asked R8MI5_a |
356 |
16.8% |
0.1676872 |
| 2 |
Respondent is asked R8MI5_b |
354 |
16.7% |
0.1667452 |
| 3 |
Respondent is asked R8MI5_c |
339 |
16.0% |
0.1596797 |
| 4 |
Respondent is asked R8MI5_d |
388 |
18.3% |
0.1827602 |
| 5 |
Respondent is asked R8MI5_e |
348 |
16.4% |
0.1639190 |
| 6 |
Respondent is asked R8MI5_f |
338 |
15.9% |
0.1592087 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6489 |
|
NA |
r8mi5_a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, Muslim leaders demands: More awareness about the
challenges of becoming full members of Norwegian society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslim leaders are demanding more awareness about the challenges of
becoming full members of Norwegian society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with them about giving this more
attention?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI5_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
11 |
3.1% |
0.03089888 |
| 2 |
Agree |
66 |
18.5% |
0.18539326 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
70 |
19.7% |
0.19662921 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
95 |
26.7% |
0.26685393 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
40 |
11.2% |
0.11235955 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
40 |
11.2% |
0.11235955 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
5.9% |
0.05898876 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
3.7% |
0.03651685 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8256 |
|
NA |
r8mi5_b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, Muslim leaders demands: More awareness about how in
various ways they are treated unfairly Norwegian society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslim leaders are demanding more awareness about how in various
ways they are treated unfairly in Norwegian society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with them about giving this more
attention?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI5_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
9 |
2.5% |
0.02542373 |
| 2 |
Agree |
27 |
7.6% |
0.07627119 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
59 |
16.7% |
0.16666667 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
86 |
24.3% |
0.24293785 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
55 |
15.5% |
0.15536723 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
64 |
18.1% |
0.18079096 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
13.8% |
0.13841808 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.4% |
0.01412429 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8258 |
|
NA |
r8mi5_c
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, Muslim leaders insists: More awareness about the
challenges of becoming full members of Norwegian society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslim leaders are insisting on more awareness about the challenges
of becoming full members of Norwegian society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with them about giving this more
attention?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI5_ran=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
18 |
5.3% |
0.05309735 |
| 2 |
Agree |
70 |
20.6% |
0.20648968 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
72 |
21.2% |
0.21238938 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
92 |
27.1% |
0.27138643 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
29 |
8.6% |
0.08554572 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
36 |
10.6% |
0.10619469 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
4.4% |
0.04424779 |
| 97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.1% |
0.02064897 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8273 |
|
NA |
r8mi5_d
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, Muslim leaders insists: More awareness about how in
various ways they are treated unfairly Norwegian society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslim leaders are insisting on more awareness about how in various
ways they are treated unfairly in Norwegian society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with them about giving this more
attention?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI5_ran=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
9 |
2.3% |
0.02319588 |
| 2 |
Agree |
40 |
10.3% |
0.10309278 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
64 |
16.5% |
0.16494845 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
95 |
24.5% |
0.24484536 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
48 |
12.4% |
0.12371134 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
75 |
19.3% |
0.19329897 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
52 |
13.4% |
0.13402062 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.3% |
0.01288660 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8224 |
|
NA |
r8mi5_e
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, Muslim leaders asking for: More awareness about the
challenges of becoming full members of Norwegian society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslim leaders are asking for more awareness of the challenges of
becoming full members of Norwegian society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with them about giving this more
attention?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI5_ran=5.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
27 |
7.8% |
0.07758621 |
| 2 |
Agree |
74 |
21.3% |
0.21264368 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
75 |
21.6% |
0.21551724 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
74 |
21.3% |
0.21264368 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
24 |
6.9% |
0.06896552 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
35 |
10.1% |
0.10057471 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
8.9% |
0.08908046 |
| 97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.3% |
0.02298851 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8264 |
|
NA |
r8mi5_f
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, Muslim leaders asking for: More awareness about how in
various ways they are treated unfairly Norwegian society
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslim leaders are asking for more awareness about how in various
ways they are treated unfairly in Norwegian society.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with them about giving this more
attention?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI5_ran=6.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
8 |
2.4% |
0.02366864 |
| 2 |
Agree |
38 |
11.2% |
0.11242604 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
67 |
19.8% |
0.19822485 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
82 |
24.3% |
0.24260355 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
50 |
14.8% |
0.14792899 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
60 |
17.8% |
0.17751479 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
29 |
8.6% |
0.08579882 |
| 97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.2% |
0.01183432 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8274 |
|
NA |
r8dvby9
|
Variable label:
|
Are there refugees living in your community?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees have in recent time been living in several different local
communities.
|
|
Literal question:
|
As far as you know, are there refugees living in your community?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Yes |
1280 |
59.8% |
0.59841047 |
| 2 |
No |
392 |
18.3% |
0.18326321 |
| 3 |
Don't know |
444 |
20.8% |
0.20757363 |
| 97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.1% |
0.01075269 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8dvby9aja
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings about refugees having been living in local community
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you feel about refugees having been living in your local
community?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8DVBY9=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It's okay |
906 |
70.8% |
0.7078125 |
| 2 |
It's not okay |
156 |
12.2% |
0.1218750 |
| 3 |
It does not matter |
196 |
15.3% |
0.1531250 |
| 97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.7% |
0.0171875 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7332 |
|
NA |
r8dvby9anei
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings about refugees coming to live in local community
|
|
Literal question:
|
How do you feel about refugees coming to live in your community?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8DVBY9=2 or R8DVBY9=3.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
It's okay |
465 |
55.6% |
0.55622010 |
| 2 |
It's not okay |
111 |
13.3% |
0.13277512 |
| 3 |
It does not matter |
239 |
28.6% |
0.28588517 |
| 97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02511962 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7776 |
|
NA |
r8dvby10_1
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings about refugees as a group: Admiration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about
refugees.
To what extent do you have the following feelings about refugees as a
group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
364 |
17.0% |
0.17017298 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
498 |
23.3% |
0.23281907 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
796 |
37.2% |
0.37213651 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
295 |
13.8% |
0.13791491 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
58 |
2.7% |
0.02711547 |
| 97 |
No answer |
128 |
6.0% |
0.05984105 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8dvby10_2
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings about refugees as a group: Sympathy
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about
refugees.
To what extent do you have the following feelings about refugees as a
group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Sympathy
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
69 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
152 |
7.1% |
0.07106124 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
663 |
31.0% |
0.30995792 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
859 |
40.2% |
0.40158953 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
337 |
15.8% |
0.15755026 |
| 97 |
No answer |
59 |
2.8% |
0.02758298 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8dvby10_3
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings about refugees as a group: Anxiety
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about
refugees.
To what extent do you have the following feelings about refugees as a
group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Anxiety
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
948 |
44.3% |
0.44319776 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
710 |
33.2% |
0.33193081 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
278 |
13.0% |
0.12996727 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
63 |
2.9% |
0.02945302 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
23 |
1.1% |
0.01075269 |
| 97 |
No answer |
117 |
5.5% |
0.05469846 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8dvby10_4
|
Variable label:
|
Feelings about refugees as a group: Fear
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about
refugees.
To what extent do you have the following feelings about refugees as a
group?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
713 |
33.3% |
0.33333333 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
822 |
38.4% |
0.38429173 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
382 |
17.9% |
0.17858813 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
87 |
4.1% |
0.04067321 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
33 |
1.5% |
0.01542777 |
| 97 |
No answer |
102 |
4.8% |
0.04768583 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8dv_vbs_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if v=4. The respondents are prepared to situations. This
variable randomizes the order of the scenarios. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if v=4. The respondents are prepared to scenarios
(R8DV_VBS_situasjon1 og R8DV_VBS_situasjon2). This variable randomizes
the order of the scenarios. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2118] [Invalid:6494]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Situation 1 is asked first |
1051 |
49.6% |
0.4962229 |
| 2 |
Situtation 2 is asked second |
1067 |
50.4% |
0.5037771 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6494 |
|
NA |
r8dv_vbs_name_sit1
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable. Persons name in situation 1.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores randomly chosen text that are merged into
the question text of R8DV_VBS experiment.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2118] [Invalid:6494]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Åse |
522 |
24.6% |
0.2464589 |
| 2 |
Fatima |
1596 |
75.4% |
0.7535411 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6494 |
|
NA |
r8dv_vbs_rantext_sit1
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable. Stores randomly chosen text that are merged into
the question text of R8DV_VBS experiment.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores randomly chosen text that are merged into
the question text of R8DV_VBS experiment. Only chooses a text if
r8dv_vbs_name_sit1 equals Fatima.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2118] [Invalid:6494]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
is a Norwegian citizen with an immigrant background |
501 |
23.7% |
0.2365439 |
| 2 |
is a foreign citizen with legal residence in Norway |
553 |
26.1% |
0.2610954 |
| 3 |
is in Norway without legal residence |
542 |
25.6% |
0.2559018 |
| 4 |
[NONE] |
522 |
24.6% |
0.2464589 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6494 |
|
NA |
r8dv_vbs_alternativ1_sit1
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable. Stores randomly chosen question that is asked to
the respondent in the first situation of R8DV_VBS experiment.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores randomly chosen question that is asked to
the respondent in the first situation of R8DV_VBS experiment.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2118] [Invalid:6494]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the values of the Norwegian welfare state |
727 |
34.3% |
0.3432483 |
| 2 |
international human rights |
673 |
31.8% |
0.3177526 |
| 3 |
[NONE] |
718 |
33.9% |
0.3389991 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6494 |
|
NA |
r8dv_vbs_name_sit2
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable. Persons name in situation 2.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores randomly chosen text that are merged into
the question text of R8DV_VBS experiment.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2118] [Invalid:6494]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Kari |
521 |
24.6% |
0.2459868 |
| 2 |
Zita |
1597 |
75.4% |
0.7540132 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6494 |
|
NA |
r8dv_vbs_rantext_sit2
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable. Stores randomly chosen text that are merged into
the question text of R8DV_VBS experiment.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores randomly chosen text that are merged into
the question text of R8DV_VBS experiment. Only chooses text if
r8dv_vbs_name_sit2 equals Zita.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2118] [Invalid:6494]
[Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
is a Norwegian citizen with an immigrant background |
498 |
23.5% |
0.2351275 |
| 2 |
is a foreign citizen with legal residence in Norway |
551 |
26.0% |
0.2601511 |
| 3 |
is in Norway without legal residence |
548 |
25.9% |
0.2587347 |
| 4 |
[NONE] |
521 |
24.6% |
0.2459868 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6494 |
|
NA |
r8dv_vbs_alternativ1_sit2
|
Variable label:
|
[Background variable. Stores randomly chosen question that is asked to
the respondent in the second situation of R8DV_VBS experiment.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable. Stores randomly chosen question that is asked to
the respondent in the second situation of R8DV_VBS experiment.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2118] [Invalid:6494]
[Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the values of the Norwegian welfare state |
694 |
32.8% |
0.3276676 |
| 2 |
international human rights |
724 |
34.2% |
0.3418319 |
| 3 |
[NONE] |
700 |
33.1% |
0.3305005 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6494 |
|
NA |
R8DV_VBS_situation1_q1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: What Åse/Fatima is experiencing violates human
rights/values of the Norwegian welfare state
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Åse has a very low income. She must often skip meals and eat smaller
portions than is healthy. Sometimes a whole day or longer goes by
without her eating anything. / [Fatima is a Norwegian citizen with an
immigrant background/Fatima is a foreign citizen with legal residence in
Norway/Fatima is in Norway without legal residence].
She has very low income. She must often skip meals and eat smaller
portions than is healthy. Sometimes a whole day or longer goes by
without her eating anything.]]
[ NONE / Some believe that what [Åse/Fatima] is experiencing violates
[international human rights/the values of the Norwegian welfare state].
Others disagree.]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 og r8dv_vbs_alternativ1_sit1 != 3. Experiment. the
respondents are exposed to different scenarios. All respondents receive
questions connected to both scenarios, men the order is randomized. It
also randomizes how many questions the respondents are asked abouth the
scenarios. Contact Elisabeth Ivarsflaten for further information. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
431 |
30.8% |
0.307857143 |
| 2 |
Agree |
484 |
34.6% |
0.345714286 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
195 |
13.9% |
0.139285714 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
132 |
9.4% |
0.094285714 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
53 |
3.8% |
0.037857143 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
69 |
4.9% |
0.049285714 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
25 |
1.8% |
0.017857143 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007857143 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7212 |
|
NA |
R8DV_VBS_situation1_q2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Should Åse/Fatima receive additional benefits from the
state?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some believe that [Åse/Fatima] should receive additional benefits from
the state in order that they can be better off, even if there will then
be less state funds for other purposes. Others disagree.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that [Åse/Fatima] should receive
additional benefits from the state?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. Experiment. the respondents are exposed to different
scenarios. All respondents receive questions connected to both
scenarios, men the order is randomized. It also randomizes how many
questions the respondents are asked abouth the scenarios. Contact
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten for further information. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
300 |
14.2% |
0.14164306 |
| 2 |
Agree |
570 |
26.9% |
0.26912181 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
527 |
24.9% |
0.24881964 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
272 |
12.8% |
0.12842304 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
155 |
7.3% |
0.07318225 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
176 |
8.3% |
0.08309726 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
94 |
4.4% |
0.04438149 |
| 97 |
No answer |
24 |
1.1% |
0.01133144 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6494 |
|
NA |
R8DV_VBS_situation2_q1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Kari/Zita is having a hard time at work, does it violate
human rights/values of the Norwegian welfare state
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Kari is having a hard time at work. Sometimes she works 10 hours
continuously without a break. She has a low hourly wage and is often not
paid for overtime. Sometimes there is no salary at all. / [Zita is a
Norwegian citizen with an immigrant background/Zita is a foreign citizen
with legal residency in Norway/Zita is in Norway without legal
residency]. She is having a hard time at work. Sometimes she works 10
hours continuously without a break. She has a low hourly wage and is
often not paid for overtime. Sometimes there is no salary at all.]]
[NONE /Some believe that what [Kari/Zita] is experiencing violates
[international human rights/the values of the Norwegian welfare state].
Others disagree.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 og r8dv_vbs_alternativ1_sit2 != 3. Experiment. the
respondents are exposed to different scenarios. All respondents receive
questions connected to both scenarios, men the order is randomized. It
also randomizes how many questions the respondents are asked abouth the
scenarios. Contact Elisabeth Ivarsflaten for further information. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
649 |
45.8% |
0.457686883 |
| 2 |
Agree |
451 |
31.8% |
0.318053597 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
128 |
9.0% |
0.090267983 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
87 |
6.1% |
0.061354020 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
34 |
2.4% |
0.023977433 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
38 |
2.7% |
0.026798307 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
22 |
1.6% |
0.015514810 |
| 97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.6% |
0.006346968 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7194 |
|
NA |
R8DV_VBS_situation2_q2
|
Variable label:
|
Strictest possible sanctions or a warning against Kari’s/Zita’s
employer?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some believe that the state should react with the strictest possible
sanctions against [Kari’s/Zita’s] employer, while others believe a
warning is sufficient.
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. Experiment. the respondents are exposed to different
scenarios. All respondents receive questions connected to both
scenarios, men the order is randomized. It also randomizes how many
questions the respondents are asked abouth the scenarios. Contact
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten for further information. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The state should react with the strictest possible sanctions against the
employer |
1648 |
77.8% |
0.77809254 |
| 2 |
A warning is sufficient |
436 |
20.6% |
0.20585458 |
| 97 |
No answer |
34 |
1.6% |
0.01605288 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6494 |
|
NA |
r8mi6_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Randomly chooses if R8MI6_a or R8MI6_b are asked to the respondent. ]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly chooses if R8MI6_a or R8MI6_b are asked to the respondent. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2115] [Invalid:6497]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Asked R8MI6_a |
1078 |
51.0% |
0.5096927 |
| 2 |
Asked R8MI6_b |
1037 |
49.0% |
0.4903073 |
| Sysmiss |
|
6497 |
|
NA |
r8mi6_a
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Must insist that Norwegian nationals from Muslim countries
let go of their values/traditions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
If Norway is to remain a peaceful, affluent society, we must insist that
Norwegian nationals who have come here from Muslim countries let go of
their values and traditions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI6_ran=1.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
90 |
8.3% |
0.08348794 |
| 2 |
Agree |
116 |
10.8% |
0.10760668 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
292 |
27.1% |
0.27087199 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
136 |
12.6% |
0.12615955 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
169 |
15.7% |
0.15677180 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
197 |
18.3% |
0.18274583 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
61 |
5.7% |
0.05658627 |
| 97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.6% |
0.01576994 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7534 |
|
NA |
r8mi6_b
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Have to respect the values/traditions of Norwegian nationals
from Muslim countries
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
If Norway is to remain a peaceful, affluent society we have to respect
the values and traditions of Norwegian citizens who have come here from
Muslim countries.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and R8MI6_ran=2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
97 |
9.4% |
0.093539055 |
| 2 |
Agree |
245 |
23.6% |
0.236258438 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
285 |
27.5% |
0.274831244 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
105 |
10.1% |
0.101253616 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
139 |
13.4% |
0.134040501 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
96 |
9.3% |
0.092574735 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
60 |
5.8% |
0.057859209 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.0% |
0.009643202 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7575 |
|
NA |
r8mi7_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Muslims a lot to offer Norwegian culture
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims have a lot to offer Norwegian culture.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
125 |
5.8% |
0.05843852 |
| 2 |
Agree |
430 |
20.1% |
0.20102852 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
564 |
26.4% |
0.26367461 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
360 |
16.8% |
0.16830295 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
191 |
8.9% |
0.08929406 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
254 |
11.9% |
0.11874708 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
165 |
7.7% |
0.07713885 |
| 97 |
No answer |
50 |
2.3% |
0.02337541 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8mi7_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Muslim men in Norway dominate women
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Muslim men in Norway dominate women.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
445 |
20.8% |
0.20804114 |
| 2 |
Agree |
661 |
30.9% |
0.30902291 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
513 |
24.0% |
0.23983170 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
344 |
16.1% |
0.16082281 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
54 |
2.5% |
0.02524544 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
42 |
2.0% |
0.01963534 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
32 |
1.5% |
0.01496026 |
| 97 |
No answer |
48 |
2.2% |
0.02244039 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8mi7_3
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Western European and Muslim ways of life incompatible
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Western European and Muslim ways of life are incompatible.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
193 |
9.0% |
0.09022908 |
| 2 |
Agree |
259 |
12.1% |
0.12108462 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
416 |
19.4% |
0.19448340 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
353 |
16.5% |
0.16503039 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
342 |
16.0% |
0.15988780 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
429 |
20.1% |
0.20056101 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
97 |
4.5% |
0.04534829 |
| 97 |
No answer |
50 |
2.3% |
0.02337541 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8mi7_4
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most Muslims in Norway respect other cultures
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Most Muslims in Norway respect other cultures.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
113 |
5.3% |
0.05282842 |
| 2 |
Agree |
563 |
26.3% |
0.26320711 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
412 |
19.3% |
0.19261337 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
377 |
17.6% |
0.17625058 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
281 |
13.1% |
0.13136980 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
199 |
9.3% |
0.09303413 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
145 |
6.8% |
0.06778869 |
| 97 |
No answer |
49 |
2.3% |
0.02290790 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8mi7_5
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Muslims in Norway raise children in an authoritarian way
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims in Norway raise their children in an authoritarian way.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
148 |
6.9% |
0.06919121 |
| 2 |
Agree |
416 |
19.4% |
0.19448340 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
539 |
25.2% |
0.25198691 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
781 |
36.5% |
0.36512389 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
109 |
5.1% |
0.05095839 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
63 |
2.9% |
0.02945302 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01355774 |
| 97 |
No answer |
54 |
2.5% |
0.02524544 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8mi8_1
|
Variable label:
|
How fitting is description of you: Important for me to be unprejudiced
in regard to Muslims
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to
Muslims.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
281 |
13.1% |
0.13136980 |
| 2 |
Good |
667 |
31.2% |
0.31182796 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
432 |
20.2% |
0.20196353 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
453 |
21.2% |
0.21178121 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
126 |
5.9% |
0.05890603 |
| 6 |
Bad |
73 |
3.4% |
0.03412810 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
32 |
1.5% |
0.01496026 |
| 97 |
No answer |
75 |
3.5% |
0.03506311 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8mi8_2
|
Variable label:
|
How fitting is description of you: Feel guilty if I think negatively
about Muslims
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about Muslims.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
90 |
4.2% |
0.04207574 |
| 2 |
Good |
240 |
11.2% |
0.11220196 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
325 |
15.2% |
0.15194016 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
652 |
30.5% |
0.30481533 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
259 |
12.1% |
0.12108462 |
| 6 |
Bad |
317 |
14.8% |
0.14820009 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
174 |
8.1% |
0.08134642 |
| 97 |
No answer |
82 |
3.8% |
0.03833567 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8mi8_3
|
Variable label:
|
How fitting is description of you: Try to be unprejudiced in regard to
Muslims due to own convictions
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced in regard to Muslims due to my own convictions.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
186 |
8.7% |
0.08695652 |
| 2 |
Good |
593 |
27.7% |
0.27723235 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
430 |
20.1% |
0.20102852 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
550 |
25.7% |
0.25712950 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
112 |
5.2% |
0.05236092 |
| 6 |
Bad |
106 |
5.0% |
0.04955587 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
70 |
3.3% |
0.03272557 |
| 97 |
No answer |
92 |
4.3% |
0.04301075 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8mi8_4
|
Variable label:
|
How fitting is description of you: Do not want to appear racist, not
even to myself
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply
to you:
|
|
Literal question:
|
I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very good |
422 |
19.7% |
0.19728845 |
| 2 |
Good |
637 |
29.8% |
0.29780271 |
| 3 |
Somewhat good |
327 |
15.3% |
0.15287518 |
| 4 |
Neither good nor bad |
432 |
20.2% |
0.20196353 |
| 5 |
Somewhat bad |
102 |
4.8% |
0.04768583 |
| 6 |
Bad |
78 |
3.6% |
0.03646564 |
| 7 |
Very bad |
58 |
2.7% |
0.02711547 |
| 97 |
No answer |
83 |
3.9% |
0.03880318 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6473 |
|
NA |
r8dvby3
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of fear for new terrorist attack in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if v=4 and u!=4.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
120 |
6.5% |
0.064655172 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
643 |
34.6% |
0.346443966 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
715 |
38.5% |
0.385237069 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
246 |
13.3% |
0.132543103 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
121 |
6.5% |
0.065193966 |
| 97 |
No answer |
11 |
0.6% |
0.005926724 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6756 |
|
NA |
r8frflykt_panel_1
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution refugee situation: Donation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last years. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Donation (e.g. money/clothing/equipment)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_filter=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Donation (e.g. money/clothing/equipment) |
280 |
31.5% |
0.31460674 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.1% |
0.01123596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7722 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
600 |
67.4% |
0.67415730 |
r8frflykt_panel_2
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution refugee situation: Physical contribution
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last years. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Physical contribution (e.g. given out food/clothing/equipment directly
to refugees)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_filter=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Physical contribution (e.g. given out food/clothing/equipment directly to
refugees) |
29 |
3.3% |
0.03258427 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.1% |
0.01123596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7722 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
851 |
95.6% |
0.95617978 |
r8frflykt_panel_3
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution refugee situation: Administrative contribution
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last years. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Administrative contribution (e.g. coordinated action/information work)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_filter=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Administrative contribution (e.g. coordinated action/information work) |
21 |
2.4% |
0.02359551 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.1% |
0.01123596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7722 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
859 |
96.5% |
0.96516854 |
r8frflykt_panel_4
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution refugee situation: Other form of contribution
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last years. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other form of contribution; specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_filter=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other form of contribution; specify: |
51 |
5.7% |
0.05730337 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.1% |
0.01123596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7722 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
829 |
93.1% |
0.93146067 |
r8frflykt_panel_4_other
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution refugee situation: Other form of contribution [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last years. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other form of contribution, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_filter=1. Asked to respondents that have
responded on same question in previous wave(s).]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8frflykt_panel_5
|
Variable label:
|
Contribution refugee situation: No, none of these
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of
the last years. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the
following contributions in connection with the refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
No, none of these
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_filter=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No, none of these |
544 |
61.1% |
0.61123596 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.1% |
0.01123596 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7722 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
336 |
37.8% |
0.37752809 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_1
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Gave money
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gave money
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gave money |
229 |
69.4% |
0.6939394 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
101 |
30.6% |
0.3060606 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_2
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Gave clothing/equipment/food
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gave clothing/equipment/food
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gave clothing/equipment/food |
149 |
45.2% |
0.4515152 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
181 |
54.8% |
0.5484848 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_3
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Gave out clothing/equipment/food directly to
refugees
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gave out clothing/equipment/food directly to refugees
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Gave out clothing/equipment/food directly to refugees |
14 |
4.2% |
0.04242424 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
316 |
95.8% |
0.95757576 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_4
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Acted as a refugee guide
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Acted as a refugee guide
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Acted as a refugee guide |
4 |
1.2% |
0.01212121 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
326 |
98.8% |
0.98787879 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_5
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Acted as visiting friend/social contact
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Acted as visiting friend/social contact
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Acted as visiting friend/social contact |
23 |
7.0% |
0.06969697 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
307 |
93.0% |
0.93030303 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_6
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Helped with homework/lessons
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Helped with homework/lessons
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Helped with homework/lessons |
10 |
3.0% |
0.03030303 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
320 |
97.0% |
0.96969697 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_7
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Organised gatherings
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Organised gatherings
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Organised gatherings |
16 |
4.8% |
0.04848485 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
314 |
95.2% |
0.95151515 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_8
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Helped with teaching Norwegian/other teaching
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Helped with teaching Norwegian/other teaching
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Helped with teaching Norwegian/other teaching |
28 |
8.5% |
0.08484848 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
302 |
91.5% |
0.91515152 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_9
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Helped with organisation and activities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Helped with organisation and activities (e.g. at asylum seekers’ centre)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Helped with organisation and activities (e.g. at asylum seekers’ centre) |
16 |
4.8% |
0.04848485 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
314 |
95.2% |
0.95151515 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_10
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Housed refugees at home
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Housed refugees at home
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Housed refugees at home |
8 |
2.4% |
0.02424242 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
322 |
97.6% |
0.97575758 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_11
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Administered/coordinated volunteers
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Administered/coordinated volunteers
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Administered/coordinated volunteers |
9 |
2.7% |
0.02727273 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
321 |
97.3% |
0.97272727 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_12
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Information work
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Information work
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Information work |
11 |
3.3% |
0.03333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
319 |
96.7% |
0.96666667 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_13
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Editing/moderating websites
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Editing/moderating websites (inc. social media)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Editing/moderating websites (inc. social media) |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006060606 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
328 |
99.4% |
0.993939394 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_14
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
16 |
4.8% |
0.04848485 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
314 |
95.2% |
0.95151515 |
r8frflykt_1_panel_14_other
|
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Other [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have
responded on same question in previous wave(s).]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8frflykt_2_panel_1
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Traditional voluntary
organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
A traditional voluntary organisation (e.g. Red Cross, Norwegian People’s
Aid)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A traditional voluntary organisation (e.g. Red Cross, Norwegian People's Aid) |
201 |
60.9% |
0.6090909 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
129 |
39.1% |
0.3909091 |
r8frflykt_2_panel_2
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Newly-formed
initiative/organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
A newly-formed initiative/organisation (e.g. Refugees Welcome to Norway,
Drop in the Ocean)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A newly-formed initiative/organisation (e.g. Refugees Welcome to Norway, Drop in
the Ocean) |
24 |
7.3% |
0.07272727 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
306 |
92.7% |
0.92727273 |
r8frflykt_2_panel_3
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Public body
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
A public body (municipality, agency etc.)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A public body (municipality, agency etc.) |
41 |
12.4% |
0.1242424 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
289 |
87.6% |
0.8757576 |
r8frflykt_2_panel_4
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Private body
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
A private body
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A private body |
45 |
13.6% |
0.1363636 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
285 |
86.4% |
0.8636364 |
r8frflykt_2_panel_5
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
An asylum seekers’ centre (public or private)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
An asylum seekers’ centre (public or private) |
11 |
3.3% |
0.03333333 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
319 |
96.7% |
0.96666667 |
r8frflykt_2_panel_6
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: On own initiative/together
with friends and family
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Organised work on own initiative/together with friends and family
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Organised work on own initiative/together with friends and family |
22 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
308 |
93.3% |
0.93333333 |
r8frflykt_2_panel_7
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
27 |
8.2% |
0.08181818 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
303 |
91.8% |
0.91818182 |
r8frflykt_2_panel_7_other
|
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Other [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the
refugee situation?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have
responded on same question in previous wave(s).]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8frflykt_3_panel_1
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by organisation
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by an organisation
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by an organisation |
101 |
30.6% |
0.3060606 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
229 |
69.4% |
0.6939394 |
r8frflykt_3_panel_2
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via Facebook group
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via a Facebook group; specify which group:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited via a Facebook group; specify which group: |
18 |
5.5% |
0.05454545 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
312 |
94.5% |
0.94545455 |
r8frflykt_3_panel_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via Facebook group [Data
withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via a Facebook group; specify which group:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have
responded on same question in previous wave(s).]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8frflykt_3_panel_3
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via the municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via the municipality in which I live
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited via the municipality in which I live |
16 |
4.8% |
0.04848485 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
314 |
95.2% |
0.95151515 |
r8frflykt_3_panel_4
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via asylum seeker’s centre
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via an asylum seekers’ centre
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited via an asylum seekers’ centre |
7 |
2.1% |
0.02121212 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
323 |
97.9% |
0.97878788 |
r8frflykt_3_panel_5
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via private company
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via a private company
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited via a private company |
3 |
0.9% |
0.009090909 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
327 |
99.1% |
0.990909091 |
r8frflykt_3_panel_6
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by own workplace/place of study
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by my own workplace/place of study
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by my own workplace/place of study |
22 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
308 |
93.3% |
0.93333333 |
r8frflykt_3_panel_7
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by close friends
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by close friends
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by close friends |
23 |
7.0% |
0.06969697 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
307 |
93.0% |
0.93030303 |
r8frflykt_3_panel_8
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by acquaintances
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by acquaintances
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by acquaintances |
33 |
10.0% |
0.1 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
297 |
90.0% |
0.9 |
r8frflykt_3_panel_9
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by others
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by other persons
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Was invited by other persons |
9 |
2.7% |
0.02727273 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
321 |
97.3% |
0.97272727 |
r8frflykt_3_panel_10
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Own initiative
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Took the initiative myself
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Took the initiative myself |
115 |
34.8% |
0.3484848 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
215 |
65.2% |
0.6515152 |
r8frflykt_3_panel_11
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other, specify: |
27 |
8.2% |
0.08181818 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
303 |
91.8% |
0.91818182 |
r8frflykt_3_panel_11_other
|
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Other [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees?
More than one answer possible
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have
responded on same question in previous wave(s).]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8frflykt_4_panel_1
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: Coverage in media
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Advertising or coverage in newspapers, online newspapers, TV or radio
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Advertising or coverage in newspapers, online newspapers, TV or radio |
135 |
40.9% |
0.4090909 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
195 |
59.1% |
0.5909091 |
r8frflykt_4_panel_2
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: By E-mail
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
By e-mail
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
By e-mail |
26 |
7.9% |
0.07878788 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
304 |
92.1% |
0.92121212 |
r8frflykt_4_panel_3
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: On Facebook
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
On Facebook
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
On Facebook |
61 |
18.5% |
0.1848485 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
269 |
81.5% |
0.8151515 |
r8frflykt_4_panel_4
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: On other social media (e.g. Twitter)
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
On other social media (e.g. Twitter)
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
On other social media (e.g. Twitter) |
10 |
3.0% |
0.03030303 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
320 |
97.0% |
0.96969697 |
r8frflykt_4_panel_5
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: By SMS
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
By SMS text
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
By SMS text |
24 |
7.3% |
0.07272727 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
306 |
92.7% |
0.92727273 |
r8frflykt_4_panel_6
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: By telephone
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
By telephone
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
By telephone |
19 |
5.8% |
0.05757576 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
311 |
94.2% |
0.94242424 |
r8frflykt_4_panel_7
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: By face-to-face contact
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
By face-to-face contact
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
By face-to-face contact |
99 |
30.0% |
0.3 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
231 |
70.0% |
0.7 |
r8frflykt_4_panel_8
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: Other places
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other places; specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have responded
on same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Other places; specify: |
33 |
10.0% |
0.1 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
8282 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
297 |
90.0% |
0.9 |
r8frflykt_4_panel_8_other
|
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee
situation as a volunteer: Other places [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution
to the refugee situation as a volunteer?
More than one answer possible.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other places; specify:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8FRflykt_panel_5!=1. Asked to respondents that have
responded on same question in previous wave(s).]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8km4_b_panel
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and
Vesterålen areas
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below.
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and Vesterålen
areas.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8KM4_b_filter=1. Asked to respondents that have responded on
same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
987 |
28.8% |
0.28842782 |
| 2 |
Agree |
625 |
18.3% |
0.18264173 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
478 |
14.0% |
0.13968440 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
395 |
11.5% |
0.11542957 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
405 |
11.8% |
0.11835184 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
313 |
9.1% |
0.09146698 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
161 |
4.7% |
0.04704851 |
| 97 |
No answer |
58 |
1.7% |
0.01694915 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
5190 |
|
NA |
r8km5_panel_1
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you
agree/disagree with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8KM5_filter=1. Asked to respondents that have responded on
same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
33 |
3.6% |
0.03602620 |
| 2 |
Agree |
116 |
12.7% |
0.12663755 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
361 |
39.4% |
0.39410480 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
146 |
15.9% |
0.15938865 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
123 |
13.4% |
0.13427948 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
91 |
9.9% |
0.09934498 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
20 |
2.2% |
0.02183406 |
| 97 |
No answer |
26 |
2.8% |
0.02838428 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7696 |
|
NA |
r8km5_panel_2
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Citizens of rich countries should cut their consumption
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you
agree/disagree with them?
|
|
Literal question:
|
The citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption
as part of the solution to the climate challenge.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R8KM5_filter=1. Asked to respondents that have responded on
same question in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
167 |
18.2% |
0.18231441 |
| 2 |
Agree |
274 |
29.9% |
0.29912664 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
264 |
28.8% |
0.28820961 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
78 |
8.5% |
0.08515284 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
46 |
5.0% |
0.05021834 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
48 |
5.2% |
0.05240175 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
23 |
2.5% |
0.02510917 |
| 97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.7% |
0.01746725 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7696 |
|
NA |
r8dvby1_panel
|
Variable label:
|
How safe/unsafe do you feel your local area is?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider your local area.
|
|
Literal question:
|
How safe or unsafe do you feel it is?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. Asked to respondents that have responded on same question
in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very safe |
397 |
35.2% |
0.351638618 |
| 2 |
Safe |
576 |
51.0% |
0.510186005 |
| 3 |
Somewhat safe |
72 |
6.4% |
0.063773251 |
| 4 |
Neither safe nor unsafe |
19 |
1.7% |
0.016829052 |
| 5 |
Somewhat unsafe |
25 |
2.2% |
0.022143490 |
| 6 |
Unsafe |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001771479 |
| 7 |
Very unsafe |
0 |
0.0% |
0.000000000 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
3.4% |
0.033658105 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7483 |
|
NA |
r8dv5_panel
|
Variable label:
|
Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway
that immigrants come to live here?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. Asked to respondents that have responded on same question
in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very great advantage |
28 |
2.5% |
0.02480071 |
| 2 |
Great advantage |
192 |
17.0% |
0.17006200 |
| 3 |
Slightly advantageuos |
405 |
35.9% |
0.35872453 |
| 4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
168 |
14.9% |
0.14880425 |
| 5 |
A slight disadvantage |
183 |
16.2% |
0.16209035 |
| 6 |
Great disadvantage |
68 |
6.0% |
0.06023029 |
| 7 |
Very great disadvantage |
38 |
3.4% |
0.03365810 |
| 97 |
No answer |
47 |
4.2% |
0.04162976 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7483 |
|
NA |
r8dv6_panel
|
Variable label:
|
How important is immigration policy to you?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. Asked to respondents that have responded on same question
in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
132 |
11.7% |
0.11691763 |
| 2 |
Important |
418 |
37.0% |
0.37023915 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
425 |
37.6% |
0.37643933 |
| 4 |
Slightly important |
101 |
8.9% |
0.08945970 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
15 |
1.3% |
0.01328609 |
| 97 |
No answer |
38 |
3.4% |
0.03365810 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7483 |
|
NA |
r8dv7_panel
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which political party has the best immigration policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. Asked to respondents that have responded on same question
in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-11]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
192 |
17.0% |
0.170062002 |
| 2 |
The Progress Party |
280 |
24.8% |
0.248007086 |
| 3 |
The Conservative Party |
154 |
13.6% |
0.136403897 |
| 4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
84 |
7.4% |
0.074402126 |
| 5 |
The Centre Party |
33 |
2.9% |
0.029229407 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democrats |
62 |
5.5% |
0.054915855 |
| 7 |
The Liberal Party |
53 |
4.7% |
0.046944198 |
| 8 |
The Red Party |
26 |
2.3% |
0.023029229 |
| 9 |
The Green Party |
11 |
1.0% |
0.009743136 |
| 10 |
Other, please specify |
11 |
1.0% |
0.009743136 |
| 11 |
None |
164 |
14.5% |
0.145261293 |
| 97 |
No answer |
59 |
5.2% |
0.052258636 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7483 |
|
NA |
r8dv7_panel_10_other
|
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy, other [Data withheld for the
sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which political party has the best immigration policy?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. Asked to respondents that have responded on same
question in previous wave(s).]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8dv29_panel
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Begging should be prohibited
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. Asked to respondents that have responded on same question
in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
227 |
20.1% |
0.20106289 |
| 2 |
Agree |
255 |
22.6% |
0.22586360 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
194 |
17.2% |
0.17183348 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
136 |
12.0% |
0.12046058 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
104 |
9.2% |
0.09211692 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
130 |
11.5% |
0.11514615 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
52 |
4.6% |
0.04605846 |
| 97 |
No answer |
31 |
2.7% |
0.02745793 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7483 |
|
NA |
r8dvh_2_panel
|
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as
Norwegians have
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians
have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. Asked to respondents that have responded on same question
in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
57 |
5.0% |
0.05048716 |
| 2 |
Agree |
249 |
22.1% |
0.22054916 |
| 3 |
Agree somewhat |
199 |
17.6% |
0.17626218 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
99 |
8.8% |
0.08768822 |
| 5 |
Disagree somewhat |
201 |
17.8% |
0.17803366 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
175 |
15.5% |
0.15500443 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
97 |
8.6% |
0.08591674 |
| 97 |
No answer |
52 |
4.6% |
0.04605846 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7483 |
|
NA |
r8dvby3_panel
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of fear for new terrorist attack in Norway
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in
Norway?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4. Asked to respondents that have responded on same question
in previous wave(s).]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Not at all |
65 |
5.8% |
0.05757307 |
| 2 |
Slightly |
456 |
40.4% |
0.40389725 |
| 3 |
Somewhat |
457 |
40.5% |
0.40478299 |
| 4 |
To a great extent |
94 |
8.3% |
0.08325952 |
| 5 |
To a very great extent |
20 |
1.8% |
0.01771479 |
| 97 |
No answer |
37 |
3.3% |
0.03277236 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
7483 |
|
NA |
r8k33
|
Variable label:
|
What applies best to what you have been doing for the last 7 days
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to
newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Paid work (or temporarily absent) |
2254 |
54.0% |
0.539621738 |
| 2 |
Studying (not paid for by an employer) |
376 |
9.0% |
0.090016758 |
| 3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
103 |
2.5% |
0.024658846 |
| 4 |
Unemployed, wanting a job, but not actively seeking work |
34 |
0.8% |
0.008139813 |
| 5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
154 |
3.7% |
0.036868566 |
| 6 |
Retired |
764 |
18.3% |
0.182906392 |
| 7 |
Civilian or military service |
11 |
0.3% |
0.002633469 |
| 8 |
At home, looking after children or others |
63 |
1.5% |
0.015082595 |
| 9 |
Other: |
268 |
6.4% |
0.064160881 |
| 97 |
No answer |
150 |
3.6% |
0.035910941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4435 |
|
NA |
r8k33_9_other
|
Variable label:
|
What applies best to what you have been doing for the last 7 days, other
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only
to newly recruited respondents. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8k33_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
What applies best to what you have been doing for the last 7 days
[kodet]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only
to newly recruited respondents. ]
[This variable contains the values of r8k33 plus coded values of
r8k33_9_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Paid work (or temporarily absent) |
2333 |
55.9% |
0.558534834 |
| 2 |
Studying (not paid for by an employer) |
402 |
9.6% |
0.096241322 |
| 3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
103 |
2.5% |
0.024658846 |
| 4 |
Unemployed, wanting a job, but not actively seeking work |
34 |
0.8% |
0.008139813 |
| 5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
169 |
4.0% |
0.040459660 |
| 6 |
Retired |
769 |
18.4% |
0.184103424 |
| 7 |
Civilian or military service |
11 |
0.3% |
0.002633469 |
| 8 |
At home, looking after children or others |
66 |
1.6% |
0.015800814 |
| 9 |
Other: |
140 |
3.4% |
0.033516878 |
| 97 |
No answer |
150 |
3.6% |
0.035910941 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4435 |
|
NA |
r8k34_1
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Public central administration
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Public central administration
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Public central administration |
227 |
10.1% |
0.1007098 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2027 |
89.9% |
0.8992902 |
r8k34_2
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Kindergarten/school/teaching
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Kindergarten/school/teaching
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Kindergarten/school/teaching |
332 |
14.7% |
0.1472937 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1922 |
85.3% |
0.8527063 |
r8k34_3
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Health services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Health services
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Health services |
261 |
11.6% |
0.1157941 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
1993 |
88.4% |
0.8842059 |
r8k34_4
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Social services/child protection
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Social services/child protection
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Social services/child protection |
63 |
2.8% |
0.02795031 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2191 |
97.2% |
0.97204969 |
r8k34_5
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Nursing and care services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Nursing and care services
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Nursing and care services |
141 |
6.3% |
0.06255546 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2113 |
93.7% |
0.93744454 |
r8k34_6
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Defence/police/judicial system/security
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Defence/police/judicial system/security
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Defence/police/judicial system/security |
66 |
2.9% |
0.02928128 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2188 |
97.1% |
0.97071872 |
r8k34_7
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Agriculture/forestry/fishing
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Agriculture/forestry/fishing
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Agriculture/forestry/fishing |
64 |
2.8% |
0.02839397 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2190 |
97.2% |
0.97160603 |
r8k34_8
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Industry/technology
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Industry/technology
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Industry/technology |
201 |
8.9% |
0.0891748 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2053 |
91.1% |
0.9108252 |
r8k34_9
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Building/construction
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Building/construction
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Building/construction |
181 |
8.0% |
0.08030169 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2073 |
92.0% |
0.91969831 |
r8k34_10
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Retailing/shop
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Retailing/shop
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Retailing/shop |
156 |
6.9% |
0.06921029 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2098 |
93.1% |
0.93078971 |
r8k34_11
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Transport/communications
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Transport/communications
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Transport/communications |
110 |
4.9% |
0.04880213 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2144 |
95.1% |
0.95119787 |
r8k34_12
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Culture/sport/organisations
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Culture/sport/organisations
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Culture/sport/organisations |
79 |
3.5% |
0.0350488 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2175 |
96.5% |
0.9649512 |
r8k34_13
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Media/advertising/PR/information
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Media/advertising/PR/information
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Media/advertising/PR/information |
62 |
2.8% |
0.02750665 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2192 |
97.2% |
0.97249335 |
r8k34_14
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Research/analysis
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Research/analysis
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Research/analysis |
95 |
4.2% |
0.04214729 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2159 |
95.8% |
0.95785271 |
r8k34_15
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Travel/hotels
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Travel/hotels
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Travel/hotels |
34 |
1.5% |
0.01508429 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2220 |
98.5% |
0.98491571 |
r8k34_16
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Restaurants/catering
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Restaurants/catering
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Restaurants/catering |
38 |
1.7% |
0.01685892 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2216 |
98.3% |
0.98314108 |
r8k34_17
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Telecommunications/IT
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Telecommunications/IT
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Telecommunications/IT |
146 |
6.5% |
0.06477374 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2108 |
93.5% |
0.93522626 |
r8k34_18
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Banking/insurance/finance
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Banking/insurance/finance
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Banking/insurance/finance |
81 |
3.6% |
0.03593611 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2173 |
96.4% |
0.96406389 |
r8k34_19
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Commercial services
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Commercial services
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Commercial services |
149 |
6.6% |
0.0661047 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.0000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2105 |
93.4% |
0.9338953 |
r8k34_20
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Oil/gas
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Oil/gas
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oil/gas |
130 |
5.8% |
0.05767524 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2124 |
94.2% |
0.94232476 |
r8k34_21
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Other
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background questions
asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Annet |
151 |
6.7% |
0.06699201 |
| 97 |
No answer |
0 |
0.0% |
0.00000000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6358 |
|
NA |
| 0 |
|
2103 |
93.3% |
0.93300799 |
r8k34_21_other
|
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Other [Data withheld for the sake of
anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other [anonymized]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8 and R8K33=1. Demographical background
questions asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8k25
|
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your current income?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only
to newly recruited respondents. ]
[Question on income is also asked respondents in previous waves. See
documentation for r8B2_1 and r8B2_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
<150 000 |
557 |
13.3% |
0.13334929 |
| 2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
602 |
14.4% |
0.14412258 |
| 3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
621 |
14.9% |
0.14867130 |
| 4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
779 |
18.6% |
0.18649749 |
| 5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
559 |
13.4% |
0.13382811 |
| 6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
309 |
7.4% |
0.07397654 |
| 7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
353 |
8.5% |
0.08451041 |
| 8 |
>1 000 000 |
154 |
3.7% |
0.03686857 |
| 97 |
No answer |
243 |
5.8% |
0.05817572 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4435 |
|
NA |
r8k26
|
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only
to newly recruited respondents. ]
[This question is missing the following category by mistake: Certificate
for additional further education (technical college)]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-14]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
38 |
0.9% |
0.009097438 |
| 2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
34 |
0.8% |
0.008139813 |
| 3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
407 |
9.7% |
0.097438353 |
| 4 |
College certificate |
52 |
1.2% |
0.012449126 |
| 5 |
Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education
programme, oneyear post admission |
565 |
13.5% |
0.135264544 |
| 6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
602 |
14.4% |
0.144122576 |
| 7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
63 |
1.5% |
0.015082595 |
| 8 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
414 |
9.9% |
0.099114197 |
| 9 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
733 |
17.5% |
0.175484798 |
| 10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
278 |
6.7% |
0.066554944 |
| 11 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
300 |
7.2% |
0.071821882 |
| 12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
400 |
9.6% |
0.095762509 |
| 13 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
66 |
1.6% |
0.015800814 |
| 14 |
None of these |
63 |
1.5% |
0.015082595 |
| 97 |
No answer |
162 |
3.9% |
0.038783816 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4435 |
|
NA |
r8k27
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please click whichever alternative is most applicable.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to
newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never been married |
622 |
14.9% |
0.1489107015 |
| 2 |
Married |
1983 |
47.5% |
0.4747426383 |
| 3 |
Legally registrered partner |
7 |
0.2% |
0.0016758439 |
| 4 |
Cohabitant |
786 |
18.8% |
0.1881733301 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated |
271 |
6.5% |
0.0648790998 |
| 6 |
Former cohabitant |
134 |
3.2% |
0.0320804405 |
| 7 |
Former legally registrered partner |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0002394063 |
| 8 |
Widow/widower |
115 |
2.8% |
0.0275317213 |
| 9 |
Other: |
98 |
2.3% |
0.0234618147 |
| 97 |
No answer |
160 |
3.8% |
0.0383050036 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4435 |
|
NA |
r8k27_9_other
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status, other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status, other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only
to newly recruited respondents. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8k27_kodet
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status [coded]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Marital status.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Please click whichever alternative is most applicable.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only
to newly recruited respondents. ]
[This variable contains the values of r8k27 plus coded values of
r8k27_9_other]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never been married |
694 |
16.6% |
0.1661479531 |
| 2 |
Married |
1984 |
47.5% |
0.4749820445 |
| 3 |
Legally registrered partner |
7 |
0.2% |
0.0016758439 |
| 4 |
Cohabitant |
788 |
18.9% |
0.1886521427 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated |
271 |
6.5% |
0.0648790998 |
| 6 |
Former cohabitant |
134 |
3.2% |
0.0320804405 |
| 7 |
Former legally registrered partner |
1 |
0.0% |
0.0002394063 |
| 8 |
Widow/widower |
115 |
2.8% |
0.0275317213 |
| 9 |
Other: |
23 |
0.6% |
0.0055063443 |
| 97 |
No answer |
160 |
3.8% |
0.0383050036 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4435 |
|
NA |
r8k28
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to
newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Norwegian citizen |
3706 |
88.7% |
0.88723965 |
| 2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
318 |
7.6% |
0.07613119 |
| 97 |
No answer |
153 |
3.7% |
0.03662916 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4435 |
|
NA |
r8k28_2_other
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship, different country than Norway [Data withheld for the sake
of anonymity]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only
to newly recruited respondents. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations.
However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The
Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:-]
|
r8hp1
|
Variable label:
|
Your health
|
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to
newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
810 |
19.4% |
0.19391908 |
| 2 |
Very good |
1538 |
36.8% |
0.36820685 |
| 3 |
Good |
1147 |
27.5% |
0.27459899 |
| 4 |
Somewhat good |
394 |
9.4% |
0.09432607 |
| 5 |
Poor |
135 |
3.2% |
0.03231985 |
| 97 |
No answer |
153 |
3.7% |
0.03662916 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4435 |
|
NA |
r8k42
|
Variable label:
|
Number of children under the age of 16
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you,
and if so, how many?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to
newly recruited respondents. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
2957 |
70.8% |
0.707924348 |
| 2 |
1 |
430 |
10.3% |
0.102944697 |
| 3 |
2 |
428 |
10.2% |
0.102465885 |
| 4 |
3 |
140 |
3.4% |
0.033516878 |
| 5 |
4 |
11 |
0.3% |
0.002633469 |
| 6 |
5 |
9 |
0.2% |
0.002154656 |
| 7 |
6 or more |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001436438 |
| 97 |
No answer |
196 |
4.7% |
0.046923629 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
4435 |
|
NA |
r8qreview1
|
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: The survey
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We are interested in knowing more about how participants perceive our
surveys.
|
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with the survey?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very satisfied |
1010 |
11.7% |
0.117278216 |
| 2 |
Satisfied |
5220 |
60.6% |
0.606130980 |
| 3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1653 |
19.2% |
0.191941477 |
| 4 |
Not very satisfied |
263 |
3.1% |
0.030538783 |
| 5 |
Not satisfied at all |
57 |
0.7% |
0.006618672 |
| 97 |
No answer |
409 |
4.7% |
0.047491872 |
r8P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
4282 |
49.7% |
0.4972132 |
| 2 |
Female |
4330 |
50.3% |
0.5027868 |
r8P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
2448 |
28.4% |
0.28425453 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
2036 |
23.6% |
0.23641431 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
438 |
5.1% |
0.05085927 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
2234 |
25.9% |
0.25940548 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
769 |
8.9% |
0.08929401 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
687 |
8.0% |
0.07977241 |
r8P3
|
Variable label:
|
County
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-19]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Akershus |
1064 |
12.4% |
0.12354854 |
| 2 |
Oslo |
1384 |
16.1% |
0.16070599 |
| 3 |
Østfold |
445 |
5.2% |
0.05167209 |
| 4 |
Vestfold |
369 |
4.3% |
0.04284719 |
| 5 |
Hedmark |
257 |
3.0% |
0.02984208 |
| 6 |
Oppland |
268 |
3.1% |
0.03111937 |
| 7 |
Buskerud |
439 |
5.1% |
0.05097538 |
| 8 |
Telemark |
258 |
3.0% |
0.02995820 |
| 9 |
Vest-Agder |
278 |
3.2% |
0.03228054 |
| 10 |
Aust-Agder |
160 |
1.9% |
0.01857873 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
769 |
8.9% |
0.08929401 |
| 12 |
Hordaland |
954 |
11.1% |
0.11077566 |
| 13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
158 |
1.8% |
0.01834649 |
| 14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
353 |
4.1% |
0.04098932 |
| 15 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
580 |
6.7% |
0.06734789 |
| 16 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
189 |
2.2% |
0.02194612 |
| 17 |
Nordland |
342 |
4.0% |
0.03971203 |
| 18 |
Troms |
251 |
2.9% |
0.02914538 |
| 19 |
Finmark |
94 |
1.1% |
0.01091500 |
r8P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1939 or earlier |
288 |
3.3% |
0.03344171 |
| 2 |
1940-1949 |
1391 |
16.2% |
0.16151881 |
| 3 |
1950-1959 |
1835 |
21.3% |
0.21307478 |
| 4 |
1960-1969 |
1744 |
20.3% |
0.20250813 |
| 5 |
1970-1979 |
1358 |
15.8% |
0.15768695 |
| 6 |
1980-1989 |
1129 |
13.1% |
0.13109614 |
| 7 |
1990 or later |
867 |
10.1% |
0.10067348 |
r8P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
3514 |
40.8% |
0.4080353 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
4231 |
49.1% |
0.4912912 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
867 |
10.1% |
0.1006735 |
r8B1
|
Variable label:
|
Which description best applies to what you have been doing the last
week?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been
doing for the last 7 days.
|
|
Post-question:
|
Mark one alternative.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of w01_k20, w03_r3k20, r4k20, r5k20,
r6k33, r7k33, r8k33. Newest value is always applied.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Paid work (or temporarily absent) |
4918 |
58.1% |
0.581323877 |
| 2 |
Studying (not paid for by an employer) |
603 |
7.1% |
0.071276596 |
| 3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
183 |
2.2% |
0.021631206 |
| 4 |
Unemployed. Want a job, but not actively seeking work |
56 |
0.7% |
0.006619385 |
| 5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
306 |
3.6% |
0.036170213 |
| 6 |
Retired |
1760 |
20.8% |
0.208037825 |
| 7 |
Civilian or military service |
18 |
0.2% |
0.002127660 |
| 8 |
At home, looking after children or others |
109 |
1.3% |
0.012884161 |
| 9 |
Other |
497 |
5.9% |
0.058747045 |
| 97 |
No answer |
10 |
0.1% |
0.001182033 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
151 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B2_1
|
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income [From wave 1. Open text]
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your current income?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a copy of w01_k25_1. The variable has not been
merged with r8B2_2 due to lack of harmony between variables. w01_k25_1
is the only variable, prior to r8k25 in wave 8, where it is specifically
asked about gross annual income. The variables that form the basis of
r8B2_2 ask for “current income” without specifying gross / net. Another
difference is that w01_k25_1 does not have answer categories but open
answers. The variables that form r8B2_2 all have predefined
intervals.
In most cases, the respondent will have reported income in either
r8B2_1, r8B2_2 or R8K25, depending on when they were recruited to the
panel.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1]
[Range:0-8500000]
|
r8B2_2
|
Variable label:
|
Current income [From wave 3, 4 and 5. Categorical]
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of w03_r3k25, r4k25 and r5k25.
The variable has not been merged with r8B2_1 or r8k25 due to lack of
harmony between variables. In R8B2_1 and r8B2_1, it is specifically
asked about gross annual income. The variables that form the basis of
r8B2_2 ask for “current income” without specifying gross / net. Another
difference is that w01_k25_1 does not have answer categories but open
answers. The variables that form r8B2_2 all have predefined intervals.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:1-8]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
< 150 000 |
265 |
10.4% |
0.10371820 |
| 2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
380 |
14.9% |
0.14872798 |
| 3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
464 |
18.2% |
0.18160470 |
| 4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
492 |
19.3% |
0.19256360 |
| 5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
379 |
14.8% |
0.14833659 |
| 6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
193 |
7.6% |
0.07553816 |
| 7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
212 |
8.3% |
0.08297456 |
| 8 |
>1 000 000 |
98 |
3.8% |
0.03835616 |
| 97 |
No answer |
72 |
2.8% |
0.02818004 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
6056 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest level of completed education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a recode of r8B3_2.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
883 |
10.3% |
0.10253135 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary eduction |
2534 |
29.4% |
0.29424059 |
| 3 |
University/university college |
4742 |
55.1% |
0.55062703 |
| 97 |
No answer |
453 |
5.3% |
0.05260102 |
r8B3_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest level of completed education
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of w01_k26, w03_r3k26, r4k26, r5k26,
r6k26 and R8K26. Newest value is always applied.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0]
[Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
57 |
0.7% |
0.006618672 |
| 2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
56 |
0.7% |
0.006502555 |
| 3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
770 |
8.9% |
0.089410125 |
| 4 |
College certificate |
87 |
1.0% |
0.010102183 |
| 5 |
Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education
programme, one-year post admission |
1109 |
12.9% |
0.128773804 |
| 6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
1154 |
13.4% |
0.133999071 |
| 7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
110 |
1.3% |
0.012772875 |
| 8 |
Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical
college) |
161 |
1.9% |
0.018694844 |
| 9 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
834 |
9.7% |
0.096841616 |
| 10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
1617 |
18.8% |
0.187761263 |
| 11 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
577 |
6.7% |
0.066999536 |
| 12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
631 |
7.3% |
0.073269856 |
| 13 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
929 |
10.8% |
0.107872736 |
| 14 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
154 |
1.8% |
0.017882025 |
| 15 |
None of these |
186 |
2.2% |
0.021597771 |
| 97 |
No answer |
180 |
2.1% |
0.020901068 |
r8B4
|
Variable label:
|
Health condition
|
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, would you say that your health is:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of w02_hp1, w03_r3hp1 og R8Hp1. Newest
value is always applied.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8462] [Invalid:150]
[Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Excellent |
1545 |
18.9% |
0.188759927 |
| 2 |
Very good |
3187 |
38.9% |
0.389370800 |
| 3 |
Good |
2373 |
29.0% |
0.289920586 |
| 4 |
Quite good |
796 |
9.7% |
0.097251069 |
| 5 |
Poor |
254 |
3.1% |
0.031032376 |
| 97 |
No answer |
30 |
0.4% |
0.003665241 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
277 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
150 |
|
NA |
r8B5
|
Variable label:
|
Living with children under 16 years
|
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you,
and if so, how many?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r4k42, r5k42 and R8K42. Newest value
is always applied.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8297] [Invalid:315]
[Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
None |
6092 |
75.2% |
0.7520059252 |
| 2 |
1 |
848 |
10.5% |
0.1046784348 |
| 3 |
2 |
856 |
10.6% |
0.1056659672 |
| 4 |
3 |
246 |
3.0% |
0.0303666214 |
| 5 |
4 |
23 |
0.3% |
0.0028391557 |
| 6 |
5 |
10 |
0.1% |
0.0012344155 |
| 7 |
6 or more |
8 |
0.1% |
0.0009875324 |
| 97 |
No answer |
18 |
0.2% |
0.0022219479 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
196 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
315 |
|
NA |
r8B6
|
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Please click whichever alternative is most applicable.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of w01_k27, w03_r3k27, r4k27, r5k27 og
R8K27. Newest value is always applied.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8604] [Invalid:8] [Range:1-9]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Never been married |
1144 |
13.6% |
0.1355289658 |
| 2 |
Married |
4475 |
53.0% |
0.5301504561 |
| 3 |
Legally registered partner |
16 |
0.2% |
0.0018955100 |
| 4 |
Cohabitant |
1540 |
18.2% |
0.1824428385 |
| 5 |
Divorced/separated |
617 |
7.3% |
0.0730956048 |
| 6 |
Former cohabitant |
285 |
3.4% |
0.0337637721 |
| 7 |
Former legally registered partner |
2 |
0.0% |
0.0002369388 |
| 8 |
Widow/widower |
221 |
2.6% |
0.0261817320 |
| 9 |
Other: |
129 |
1.5% |
0.0152825495 |
| 97 |
No answer |
12 |
0.1% |
0.0014216325 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
163 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
8 |
|
NA |
r8B7
|
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of w01_k28, w03_r3k28, r4k28, r5k28 and
R8K28. Newest value is always applied.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4427] [Invalid:4185]
[Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
4189 |
94.7% |
0.946880651 |
| 2 |
A citizen of another county. Please select which: |
222 |
5.0% |
0.050180832 |
| 97 |
No answer |
13 |
0.3% |
0.002938517 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
3 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
4185 |
|
NA |
r8B8_1
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_1] What industry do you work
in: Public central administration
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5172 |
91.4% |
0.9136195019 |
| 1 |
Public central administration |
484 |
8.5% |
0.0854972620 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_2
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_2] What industry do you work
in: Kindergarten/school/teaching
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
4921 |
86.9% |
0.8692810458 |
| 1 |
Kindergarten/school/teaching |
735 |
13.0% |
0.1298357181 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_3
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_3] What industry do you work
in: Health services
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5010 |
88.5% |
0.8850026497 |
| 1 |
Health services |
646 |
11.4% |
0.1141141141 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_4
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_4] What industry do you work
in: Social services/child protection
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5513 |
97.4% |
0.9738562092 |
| 1 |
Social services/child protection |
143 |
2.5% |
0.0252605547 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_5
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_5] What industry do you work
in: Nursing and care services
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5371 |
94.9% |
0.9487723017 |
| 1 |
Nursing and care services |
285 |
5.0% |
0.0503444621 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_6
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_6] What industry do you work
in: Defence/police/judicial system/security
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5502 |
97.2% |
0.9719130896 |
| 1 |
Defence/police/judicial system/security |
154 |
2.7% |
0.0272036743 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_7
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_7] What industry do you work
in: Agriculture/forestry/fishing
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5477 |
96.7% |
0.9674969087 |
| 1 |
Agriculture/forestry/fishing |
179 |
3.2% |
0.0316198551 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_8
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_8] What industry do you work
in: Industry/technology
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5243 |
92.6% |
0.9261614556 |
| 1 |
Industry/technology |
413 |
7.3% |
0.0729553082 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_9
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_9] What industry do you work
in: Building/construction
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5239 |
92.5% |
0.9254548666 |
| 1 |
Building/construction |
417 |
7.4% |
0.0736618972 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_10
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_10] What industry do you work
in: Retailing/shop
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5346 |
94.4% |
0.9443561208 |
| 1 |
Retailing/shop |
310 |
5.5% |
0.0547606430 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_11
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_11] What industry do you work
in: Transport/communications
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5400 |
95.4% |
0.9538950715 |
| 1 |
Transport/communications |
256 |
4.5% |
0.0452216923 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_12
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_12] What industry do you work
in: Culture/sport/organisations
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5461 |
96.5% |
0.9646705529 |
| 1 |
Culture/sport/organisations |
195 |
3.4% |
0.0344462109 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_13
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_13] What industry do you work
in: Media/advertising
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5512 |
97.4% |
0.9736795619 |
| 1 |
Media/advertising |
144 |
2.5% |
0.0254372019 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_14
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_14] What industry do you work
in: Research/analysis
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5424 |
95.8% |
0.9581346052 |
| 1 |
Research/analysis |
232 |
4.1% |
0.0409821586 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_15
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_15] What industry do you work
in: Travel/hotels
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5579 |
98.6% |
0.9855149267 |
| 1 |
Travel/hotels |
77 |
1.4% |
0.0136018371 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_16
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_16] What industry do you work
in: Restaurants/catering
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5586 |
98.7% |
0.9867514573 |
| 1 |
Restaurants/catering |
70 |
1.2% |
0.0123653065 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_17
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_17] What industry do you work
in: Telecommunications/IT
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5370 |
94.9% |
0.9485956545 |
| 1 |
Telecommunications/IT |
286 |
5.1% |
0.0505211093 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_18
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_18] What industry do you work
in: Banking/insurance/finance
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5459 |
96.4% |
0.9643172584 |
| 1 |
Banking/insurance/finance |
197 |
3.5% |
0.0347995054 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_19
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_19] What industry do you work
in: Commercial services
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5331 |
94.2% |
0.9417064123 |
| 1 |
Commercial services |
325 |
5.7% |
0.0574103515 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_20
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_20] What industry do you work
in: Oil/gas
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
5369 |
94.8% |
0.9484190072 |
| 1 |
Oil/gas |
287 |
5.1% |
0.0506977566 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8B8_21
|
Variable label:
|
[WARNING: contains data errors from r7k34_21] What industry do you work
in: Other
|
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[This variable is a compilation of r6k34_1 - r6k34_21, r7k34_1-r7k34_21
and R8K34_1-r8k34_21. Newest value is always applied. ]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8611] [Invalid:1] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Not selected |
4705 |
83.1% |
0.8311252429 |
| 1 |
Other |
951 |
16.8% |
0.1679915209 |
| 97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008832362 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2950 |
|
NA |
| Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
r8Weight1
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2 and P1. See documentation report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]
|
r8Weight2
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P1 and B3_1 . See documentation
report
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]
|
r8Weight4
|
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1 (Note! recoded to two-level: 1)
upper secondary and lower, and 2) University/University college), and
age. Similiar to Weight2 only with capped weight value (x is >= .2
and x <= 5).
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:8612] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]
|
