Citation
Primary researchers
|
Name
|
Affiliaton
|
|
Yvette Peters
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
|
Troy Saghaug Broderstad
|
University of Bergen
|
|
Arjan Schakel
|
University of Bergen
|
Producers
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Panel of Elected Representatives is an internet-based survey of elected representatives, at all political levels, in Norway. The survey deals with matters that are important to society, representation and democracy. All elected politicians are invited to participate.
The Panel of Elected Representatives is part of the Digital Social Science Core Facility (DIGSSCORE) at the University of Bergen (UiB). The Panel of elected Representatives is also affiliated with the Norwegian citizen Panel, the Norwegian Journalist Panel, and the Norwegian Panel of Public Administrators. The University of Bergen is the owner and treatment manager of the Panel of Elected Representatives. Ideas2Evidence executes the practical implementation of the survey, and are responsible for recruting participants, as well as sending and receiving surveys to and from respondents. The data is stored encrypted and secure in UiB's infrastructure for for safe processing of sensitive personal data in research, ‘SAFE’. The panel has been reported to and processed by the Data Protection Official for Research at the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD) pursuant to the Personal Data Act. More information can be found at uib.no/NRP.
Scope
Geographic coverage: National.
Unit of analysis: Elected representatives.
Universe: All elected representatives in Norway.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Elected representatives at all political levels in Norway - municipal councils, county councils, the Storting (parliament) and the Sami Parliament of Norway - are invited to participate in the Panel of Elected Representatives. Contact information has been collected through Kommuneforlaget AS' registers, as well as public information from websites of municipalities, county municipalitites, the Storting, and the Sami Parliament of Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a online questionnaire where the panel members are invited by email. The panel members were recruited to the panel in wave 1, 3 and 5. Note that recruitment in wave 3 was due to the 2019 municipal election. Representatives who where not re-elected was omitted from the panel, while newly elected and re-elected representatives where invited to participate.
For a more detailed description of how the members were recruited, please see the documentation report from wave 1, 3 and 5.
Wave 6 was fielded from 16th of August 2021 to the 8th of September 2021. The panel was fielded before parlimentary elections were held in autumn of 2021.
Change Log
No changes registred.
Dataset contents
|
File name
|
The Panel of Elected Representatives - round 6 - v-100-L.sav
|
|
Distribution type
|
Privileged
|
|
# Cases
|
2064
|
|
# Variables
|
110
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
|
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
p6rekruttert
|
Variable label:
|
The wave the respondent was recruited
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Recruited in round 1 |
827 |
40.1% |
0.40067829 |
| 3 |
Recruited in round 3 |
1076 |
52.1% |
0.52131783 |
| 5 |
Recruited in round 5 |
161 |
7.8% |
0.07800388 |
p6browsertype
|
Variable label:
|
Browertype used by respondent
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
p6browserversion
|
Variable label:
|
Browser version used by respondent
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
p6mobil
|
Variable label:
|
Determines if the respondents uses mobile
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Mobile |
704 |
34.1% |
0.3410853 |
| 0 |
Other |
1360 |
65.9% |
0.6589147 |
p6opplosning
|
Variable label:
|
Screen resolution of the applied device
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
p6enhetstype
|
Variable label:
|
Determines respondents device type
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
PC |
1363 |
66% |
0.660368217 |
| 2 |
Touch |
682 |
33% |
0.330426357 |
| 3 |
Generic |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009205426 |
p6advancedwifeaturesenabled
|
Variable label:
|
Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
p6getrenderingmode
|
Variable label:
|
Detects the browsers rendering mode
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
p6per36
|
Variable label:
|
How many years have you been an elected representative?
|
|
Literal question:
|
How many years have you been an elected representative (regardless of where and when you were elected)?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 - 3 years |
499 |
24.2% |
0.241763566 |
| 2 |
4 – 7 years |
477 |
23.1% |
0.231104651 |
| 3 |
8 – 11 years |
349 |
16.9% |
0.169089147 |
| 4 |
12 – 15 years |
251 |
12.2% |
0.121608527 |
| 5 |
16 – 19 years |
160 |
7.8% |
0.077519380 |
| 6 |
20 or more |
324 |
15.7% |
0.156976744 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001937984 |
p6per40
|
Variable label:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Labour Party |
579 |
28.1% |
0.2805232558 |
| 2 |
Democrats in Norway |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0014534884 |
| 3 |
The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
11 |
0.5% |
0.0053294574 |
| 4 |
The Progress Party |
133 |
6.4% |
0.0644379845 |
| 5 |
The Conservative Party |
339 |
16.4% |
0.1642441860 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democrats |
110 |
5.3% |
0.0532945736 |
| 7 |
The Coastal Party |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000000 |
| 8 |
The Green Party |
83 |
4% |
0.0402131783 |
| 9 |
The Christians |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0014534884 |
| 10 |
Pensioners' Party |
19 |
0.9% |
0.0092054264 |
| 11 |
The Red Party |
49 |
2.4% |
0.0237403101 |
| 12 |
The Centre Party |
413 |
20% |
0.2000968992 |
| 13 |
The Socialist Left Party |
146 |
7.1% |
0.0707364341 |
| 14 |
The Liberal Party |
77 |
3.7% |
0.0373062016 |
| 15 |
Other |
98 |
4.7% |
0.0474806202 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0% |
0.0004844961 |
p6per40_15_other
|
Variable label:
|
Other: Which party do you represenent?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party do you represent?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2064] [Range:-]
|
p6per35
|
Variable label:
|
Is your party in government or opposition?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Is your party currently in government or in opposition at your level of government?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Government |
1185 |
57.4% |
0.5741279070 |
| 2 |
Opposition |
877 |
42.5% |
0.4249031008 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009689922 |
p6per20
|
Variable label:
|
Level of expertise on property tax compared to other elected representatives
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Elected representatives must deal with many different areas of politics, and it is impossible to be an expert in all areas.
|
|
Literal question:
|
As regards property tax, how much expertise would you say you have compared to other elected representatives in your municipality?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Among those who have the least |
89 |
4.5% |
0.045385008 |
| 2 |
Neither among those who have the least or the most |
1148 |
58.5% |
0.585415604 |
| 3 |
Among those who have the most |
722 |
36.8% |
0.368179500 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001019888 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
103 |
|
NA |
p6per21
|
Variable label:
|
Voting on property tax, what would you vote for?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the municipality you live in again discusses the property tax. The argument and the presumed consequences from the different sides are the same as the last time it was discussed.
|
|
Literal question:
|
If it came to a vote and the choice stood only between these two options, what would you vote for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Property tax of 0.7 per cent |
983 |
50.1% |
0.501274860 |
| 2 |
Property tax of 0 per cent |
970 |
49.5% |
0.494645589 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.4% |
0.004079551 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
103 |
|
NA |
p6per2
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Whether the government should do more to reduce income inequalities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government should work more to reduce income inequalities in society.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
1026 |
49.7% |
0.4970930233 |
| 2 |
Agree |
417 |
20.2% |
0.2020348837 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
305 |
14.8% |
0.1477713178 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
136 |
6.6% |
0.0658914729 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
86 |
4.2% |
0.0416666667 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
68 |
3.3% |
0.0329457364 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
25 |
1.2% |
0.0121124031 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0% |
0.0004844961 |
p6per8
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Authorities should implement more measures to protect against terrorist threats, at the cost of protection of privacy.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the cost of protection of privacy.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
232 |
11.2% |
0.112403101 |
| 2 |
Agree |
561 |
27.2% |
0.271802326 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
650 |
31.5% |
0.314922481 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
169 |
8.2% |
0.081879845 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
262 |
12.7% |
0.126937984 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
139 |
6.7% |
0.067344961 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
41 |
2% |
0.019864341 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004844961 |
p6per6
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norway should halve the current meat and dairy production by 2050.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Research suggests that animal husbandry can be negative for the environment. At the same time, meat and daily products are an important source of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should halve the current meat and dairy production by 2050.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
88 |
4.3% |
0.042635659 |
| 2 |
Agree |
96 |
4.7% |
0.046511628 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
255 |
12.4% |
0.123546512 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
103 |
5% |
0.049903101 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
269 |
13% |
0.130329457 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
484 |
23.4% |
0.234496124 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
763 |
37% |
0.369670543 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002906977 |
p6per1
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Parents should have the possibility to send their children to muslim schools.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Today it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools which follow the national curriculum, but also teach Christianity.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
It should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach Islam.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
62 |
3% |
0.030038760 |
| 2 |
Agree |
263 |
12.7% |
0.127422481 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
318 |
15.4% |
0.154069767 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
279 |
13.5% |
0.135174419 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
264 |
12.8% |
0.127906977 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
458 |
22.2% |
0.221899225 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
415 |
20.1% |
0.201065891 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002422481 |
p6per3
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The government should do more to reduce wealth inequalities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
The government should work more to reduce wealth inequalities in society
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
603 |
29.2% |
0.292151163 |
| 2 |
Agree |
391 |
18.9% |
0.189437984 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
353 |
17.1% |
0.171027132 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
224 |
10.9% |
0.108527132 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
181 |
8.8% |
0.087693798 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
210 |
10.2% |
0.101744186 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
97 |
4.7% |
0.046996124 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002422481 |
p6per32
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norwegian municipalities should pay for a hot meal for lunch every day for children in kindergartens.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian municipalities should pay for a hot meal for lunch every day for children in kindergartens.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
302 |
14.6% |
0.146317829 |
| 2 |
Agree |
429 |
20.8% |
0.207848837 |
| 3 |
Somewhat agree |
410 |
19.9% |
0.198643411 |
| 4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
255 |
12.4% |
0.123546512 |
| 5 |
Somewhat disagree |
221 |
10.7% |
0.107073643 |
| 6 |
Disagree |
309 |
15% |
0.149709302 |
| 7 |
Strongly disagree |
121 |
5.9% |
0.058624031 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.8% |
0.008236434 |
p6tdr1a_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6pertdr1aa_treatment.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p6P6 = 1]
[Not randomised for respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1942] [Invalid:122] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
your county authority |
643 |
33.1% |
0.3311020 |
| 2 |
the government |
644 |
33.2% |
0.3316169 |
| 3 |
your county authority and the government |
655 |
33.7% |
0.3372812 |
| Sysmiss |
|
122 |
|
NA |
p6tdr1a_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6pertdr1ab_treatment.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p6P6 = 1]
[Not randomised for respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1942] [Invalid:122] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
your municipal authority |
603 |
31.1% |
0.3105046 |
| 2 |
the government |
693 |
35.7% |
0.3568486 |
| 3 |
your municipal authority and the governement |
646 |
33.3% |
0.3326468 |
| Sysmiss |
|
122 |
|
NA |
p6tdr1a_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6pertdr1ac_treatment.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p6P6 = 1]
[Not randomised for respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1942] [Invalid:122] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
your municipal authority |
699 |
36% |
0.3599382 |
| 2 |
your county authority |
600 |
30.9% |
0.3089598 |
| 3 |
your municipal authority and your county authority |
643 |
33.1% |
0.3311020 |
| Sysmiss |
|
122 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1aa
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of support: Your municipality closes a kindergarten in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a few questions about your willingness to to support decisions made by either your municipality, your county authority, or the government.
Imagine that your municipality needed to cut costs and decides to close down a kindergarten in your municipality in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based only on this information, to what extent would you support this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
64 |
3.3% |
0.032904884 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
209 |
10.7% |
0.107455013 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
573 |
29.5% |
0.294601542 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
696 |
35.8% |
0.357840617 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
394 |
20.3% |
0.202570694 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.5% |
0.004627249 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
119 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1aa_treatment
|
Variable label:
|
If supported by another actor, extent of support: Your municipality closes a kindergarten in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that your municipality needed to cut costs and decides to close down a kindergarten in your municipality in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you support this decision if it is supported by [p6tdr1a_ran1]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.][Follow-up question to p6pertdr1aa.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
47 |
2.4% |
0.024164524 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
209 |
10.7% |
0.107455013 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
629 |
32.3% |
0.323393316 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
657 |
33.8% |
0.337789203 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
388 |
19.9% |
0.199485861 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.8% |
0.007712082 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
119 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1ab
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of support: Your county authority closes an upper secondary school in your municipality in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a few questions about your willingness to to support decisions made by either your municipality, your county authority, or the government.
Imagine that your county authority needed to cut costs and decides in close down an upper secondary school in your municipality in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based only on this information, to what extent would you support this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
18 |
0.9% |
0.009254499 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
62 |
3.2% |
0.031876607 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
383 |
19.7% |
0.196915167 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
833 |
42.8% |
0.428277635 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
631 |
32.4% |
0.324421594 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.9% |
0.009254499 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
119 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1ab_treatment
|
Variable label:
|
If supported by another actor, extent of support: Your county authority closes an upper secondary school in your municipality in order to maintan other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that your county authority needed to cut costs and decides in close down an upper secondary school in your municipality in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you support this decision if it is supported by [p6tdr1a_ran2]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.][Follow-up question to p6pertdr1ab.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
32 |
1.6% |
0.016452442 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
151 |
7.8% |
0.077634961 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
504 |
25.9% |
0.259125964 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
707 |
36.3% |
0.363496144 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
535 |
27.5% |
0.275064267 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.8% |
0.008226221 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
119 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1ac
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of support: The government closes a department of a university college in your municipality in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a few questions about your willingness to support decisions made by either your municipality, your county authority, or the government.
Imagine that the government needed to cut costs and decides to close down a department of a university college in your municipality in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based only on this information, to what extent would you support this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
29 |
1.5% |
0.01491003 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
95 |
4.9% |
0.04884319 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
540 |
27.8% |
0.27763496 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
768 |
39.5% |
0.39485861 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
478 |
24.6% |
0.24575835 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.8% |
0.01799486 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
119 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1ac_treatment
|
Variable label:
|
If supported by another actor, extent of support: The government closes a department of a university college in your municipality in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the government needed to cut costs and decides to close down a department of a university college in your municipality in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you support this decision if it is supported by [p6tdr1a_ran3]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.][Follow-up question to p6pertdr1ac.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
45 |
2.3% |
0.02313625 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
191 |
9.8% |
0.09820051 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
618 |
31.8% |
0.31773779 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
652 |
33.5% |
0.33521851 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
404 |
20.8% |
0.20771208 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.8% |
0.01799486 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
119 |
|
NA |
p6tdr1b_ran1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6pertdr1ba_treatment.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p6P6 = 2]
[Not randomised for respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:86] [Invalid:1978] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
your county authority |
34 |
39.5% |
0.3953488 |
| 2 |
the government |
25 |
29.1% |
0.2906977 |
| 3 |
your county authority and the government |
27 |
31.4% |
0.3139535 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1978 |
|
NA |
p6tdr1b_ran2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6pertdr1bb_treatment.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p6P6 = 2]
[Not randomised for respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:86] [Invalid:1978] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the affected municipality in your county |
21 |
24.4% |
0.2441860 |
| 2 |
the government |
33 |
38.4% |
0.3837209 |
| 3 |
the affected municipality in your county and the government |
32 |
37.2% |
0.3720930 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1978 |
|
NA |
p6tdr1b_ran3
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6pertdr1bc_treatment.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p6P6 = 2]
[Not randomised for respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:86] [Invalid:1978] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
the affected municipality in your county |
24 |
27.9% |
0.2790698 |
| 2 |
your county authority |
32 |
37.2% |
0.3720930 |
| 3 |
the affected municipality in your county and your county authority |
30 |
34.9% |
0.3488372 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1ba
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of support: A municipality in your county closes a kindergarten in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a few questions about your willingness to support decisions made by either a municipality in your county, your county authority or the government.
Imagine that a municipality in your county needed to cut costs and decides to close down a kindergarten in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based only on this information, to what extent would you support this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
11 |
12.8% |
0.12790698 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
26 |
30.2% |
0.30232558 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
34 |
39.5% |
0.39534884 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
12 |
14% |
0.13953488 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1ba_treatment
|
Variable label:
|
If supported by another actor, extent of support: A municipality in your county closes a kindergarten in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a municipality in your county needed to cut costs and decides to close down a kindergarten in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you support this decision if it is supported by [p6tdr1b_ran1]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.][Follow-up question to p6pertdr1ba.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
11 |
12.8% |
0.12790698 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
29 |
33.7% |
0.33720930 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
26 |
30.2% |
0.30232558 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
17 |
19.8% |
0.19767442 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1bb
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of support: Your county authority closes an upper secondary school in a municipality in your county to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a few questions about your willingness to support decisions made by either a municipality in your county, your county authority or the government.
Imagine that your county authority needed to cut costs and decides to close down an upper secondary school in a municipality in your county in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not have been retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based only on this information, to what extent would you support this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
11 |
12.8% |
0.12790698 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
13 |
15.1% |
0.15116279 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
44 |
51.2% |
0.51162791 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
15 |
17.4% |
0.17441860 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1bb_treatment
|
Variable label:
|
If supported by another actor, extent of support: Your county authority closes an upper secondary school in a municipality in your county to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that your county authority needed to cut costs and decides to close down an upper secondary school in a municipality in your county in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not have been retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you support this decision if it is supported by [p6tdr1b_ran2]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.][Follow-up question to p6pertdr1bb.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
6 |
7% |
0.06976744 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
10 |
11.6% |
0.11627907 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
23 |
26.7% |
0.26744186 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
29 |
33.7% |
0.33720930 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
16 |
18.6% |
0.18604651 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1bc
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of support: The government closes a department of a university college in a municipality in your county in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a few questions about your willingness to support decisions made by either a municipality in your county, your county authority or the government.
Imagine that the government needed to cut costs and decides to close down a department of a university college in a municipality in your county in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based only on this information, to what extent would you support this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
2 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
10 |
11.6% |
0.11627907 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
19 |
22.1% |
0.22093023 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
37 |
43% |
0.43023256 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
16 |
18.6% |
0.18604651 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1bc_treatment
|
Variable label:
|
If supported by another actor, extent of support: The government closes a department of a university college in a municipality in your county in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the government needed to cut costs and decides to close down a department of a university college in a municipality in your county in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you support this decision if it is supported by [p6tdr1b_ran3]?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.][Follow-up question to p6pertdr1bc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
4 |
4.7% |
0.04651163 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
13 |
15.1% |
0.15116279 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
28 |
32.6% |
0.32558140 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
29 |
33.7% |
0.33720930 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
10 |
11.6% |
0.11627907 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
2 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1ca
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of support: Oslo City Council closes a kindergarten in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a few questions about your willingness to support decisions made by either Oslo City Council or the Government.
Imagine that Oslo City Council needed to cut costs and decides to close down a kindergarten in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based only on this information, to what extent would you support this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1,2]
[Posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
2 |
12.5% |
0.1250 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
6 |
37.5% |
0.3750 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
7 |
43.8% |
0.4375 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2048 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1ca_treatment
|
Variable label:
|
If supported by another actor, extent of support: Oslo City Council closes a kindergarten in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that Oslo City Council needed to cut costs and decides to close down a kindergarten in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you support this decision if it is supported by the government?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1,2]
[Posed to respondents from Oslo.][Follow-up question to p6pertdr1ca.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
2 |
12.5% |
0.1250 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
4 |
25% |
0.2500 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
8 |
50% |
0.5000 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2048 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1cb
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of support: Oslo City Council closes an upper secondary school in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a few questions about your willingness to support decisions made by either Oslo City Council or the Government.
Imagine that Oslo City Council needed to cut costs and decides to close down an upper secondary school in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based only on this information, to what extent would you support this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1,2]
[Posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:3-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
3 |
18.8% |
0.1875 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
9 |
56.2% |
0.5625 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
4 |
25% |
0.2500 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2048 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1cb_treatment
|
Variable label:
|
If supported by another actor, extent of support: Oslo City Council closes an upper secondary school in order to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that Oslo City Council needed to cut costs and decides to close down an upper secondary school in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you support this decision if it is supported by the government?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1,2]
[Posed to respondents from Oslo.][Follow-up question to p6pertdr1cb.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
2 |
12.5% |
0.1250 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
10 |
62.5% |
0.6250 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
3 |
18.8% |
0.1875 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2048 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1cc
|
Variable label:
|
Extent of support: The government closes a department of a university college in Oslo to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a few questions about your willingness to support decisions made by either Oslo City Council or the Government.
Imagine that the government needed to cut costs and decides to close down a department of a university college in Oslo in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
Based only on this information, to what extent would you support this decision?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1,2]
[Posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
5 |
31.2% |
0.3125 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
6 |
37.5% |
0.3750 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
4 |
25% |
0.2500 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2048 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr1cc_treatment
|
Variable label:
|
If supported by another actor, extent of support: The government closes a department of a university college in Oslo to maintain other public jobs.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the government needed to cut costs and decides to close down a department of a university college in Oslo in order to maintain other public jobs that would otherwise not be retained.
|
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you support this decision if it is supported by Oslo City Council?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1,2]
[Posed to respondents from Oslo.][Follow-up question to p6pertdr1cc.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
| 2 |
To a great extent |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
| 3 |
To some extent |
6 |
37.5% |
0.3750 |
| 4 |
To a small extent |
6 |
37.5% |
0.3750 |
| 5 |
Not at all |
2 |
12.5% |
0.1250 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
2048 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2a_1
|
Variable label:
|
In the local council, how important for you to promote: All who voted for you personally.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the municipal council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All who voted for you personally.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
303 |
15.5% |
0.15451300 |
| 2 |
Important |
635 |
32.4% |
0.32381438 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
497 |
25.3% |
0.25344212 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
332 |
16.9% |
0.16930138 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
133 |
6.8% |
0.06782254 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
61 |
3.1% |
0.03110658 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
103 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2a_2
|
Variable label:
|
In the local council, how important for you to promote: All voters who voted for your party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the municipal council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All voters who voted for your party.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
603 |
30.7% |
0.30749618 |
| 2 |
Important |
932 |
47.5% |
0.47526772 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
285 |
14.5% |
0.14533401 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
59 |
3% |
0.03008669 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
25 |
1.3% |
0.01274860 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
2.9% |
0.02906680 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
103 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2a_3
|
Variable label:
|
In the local council, how important for you to promote: Your party in your municipality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the municipal council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your party in your municipality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
883 |
45% |
0.450280469 |
| 2 |
Important |
826 |
42.1% |
0.421213666 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
161 |
8.2% |
0.082100969 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
22 |
1.1% |
0.011218766 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
11 |
0.6% |
0.005609383 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
3% |
0.029576747 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
103 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2a_4
|
Variable label:
|
In the local council, how important for you to promote: Your party nationally.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the municipal council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your party nationally.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
299 |
15.2% |
0.15247323 |
| 2 |
Important |
851 |
43.4% |
0.43396226 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
548 |
27.9% |
0.27944926 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
126 |
6.4% |
0.06425293 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
71 |
3.6% |
0.03620602 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
66 |
3.4% |
0.03365630 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
103 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2a_5
|
Variable label:
|
In the local council, how important for you to promote: A specific group in society, e.g. young people, the elderly, women, local businesses, ethnic minorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the municipal council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
A specific group in society, e.g. young people, the elderly, women, local businesses, ethnic minorities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
350 |
17.8% |
0.17848037 |
| 2 |
Important |
816 |
41.6% |
0.41611423 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
505 |
25.8% |
0.25752167 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
167 |
8.5% |
0.08516063 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
64 |
3.3% |
0.03263641 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
59 |
3% |
0.03008669 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
103 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2a_6
|
Variable label:
|
In the local council, how important for you to promote: All residents of your municipality.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the municipal council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All residents of your municipality.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
876 |
44.7% |
0.44671086 |
| 2 |
Important |
790 |
40.3% |
0.40285569 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
212 |
10.8% |
0.10810811 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
35 |
1.8% |
0.01784804 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
5 |
0.3% |
0.00254972 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
43 |
2.2% |
0.02192759 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
103 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2a_7
|
Variable label:
|
In the local council, how important for you to promote: All residents from a specific geographical area, e.g. a neighbourhood in your municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the municipal council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All residents from a specific geographical area, e.g. a neighbourhood in your municipality
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
156 |
8% |
0.07955125 |
| 2 |
Important |
527 |
26.9% |
0.26874044 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
573 |
29.2% |
0.29219786 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
467 |
23.8% |
0.23814380 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
175 |
8.9% |
0.08924018 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
63 |
3.2% |
0.03212647 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
103 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2b_1
|
Variable label:
|
In the county council, how important for you to promote: All who voted for you personally.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the county council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All who voted for you personally.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
14 |
16.3% |
0.16279070 |
| 2 |
Important |
22 |
25.6% |
0.25581395 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
24 |
27.9% |
0.27906977 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
15 |
17.4% |
0.17441860 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
6 |
7% |
0.06976744 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
5.8% |
0.05813953 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2b_2
|
Variable label:
|
In the county council, how important for you to promote: All voters who voted for your party.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the county council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All voters who voted for your party.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
25 |
29.1% |
0.29069767 |
| 2 |
Important |
39 |
45.3% |
0.45348837 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
14 |
16.3% |
0.16279070 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
4 |
4.7% |
0.04651163 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
4.7% |
0.04651163 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2b_3
|
Variable label:
|
In the county council, how important for you to promote: Your party in your county.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the county council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your party in your county.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
47 |
54.7% |
0.54651163 |
| 2 |
Important |
31 |
36% |
0.36046512 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
3 |
3.5% |
0.03488372 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
4.7% |
0.04651163 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2b_4
|
Variable label:
|
In the county council, how important for you to promote: Your party nationally.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the county council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
Your party nationally.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
23 |
26.7% |
0.26744186 |
| 2 |
Important |
37 |
43% |
0.43023256 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
16 |
18.6% |
0.18604651 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
4 |
4.7% |
0.04651163 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
6 |
7% |
0.06976744 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2b_5
|
Variable label:
|
In the county council, how important for you to promote: A specific group in society, e.g. young people, the elderly, women, local businesses, ethnic minorities
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the county council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
A specific group in society, e.g. young people, the elderly, women, local businesses, ethnic minorities
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
14 |
16.3% |
0.16279070 |
| 2 |
Important |
34 |
39.5% |
0.39534884 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
23 |
26.7% |
0.26744186 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
9 |
10.5% |
0.10465116 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
5 |
5.8% |
0.05813953 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2b_6
|
Variable label:
|
In the county council, how important for you to promote: All residents in your county.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the county council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All residents in your county.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
31 |
36% |
0.36046512 |
| 2 |
Important |
33 |
38.4% |
0.38372093 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
11 |
12.8% |
0.12790698 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
7 |
8.1% |
0.08139535 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
4 |
4.7% |
0.04651163 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6pertdr2b_7
|
Variable label:
|
In the county council, how important for you to promote: All residents from a specific geographical area in your county, e.g. a neighbourhood in your municipality
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you a question about who you represent and on whose behalf you act in the county council.
How important is it to you personally to promote the views and interests of the following groups?
|
|
Literal question:
|
All residents from a specific geographical area in your county, e.g. a neighbourhood in your municipality
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
[Not posed to respondents from Oslo.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very important |
12 |
14% |
0.13953488 |
| 2 |
Important |
22 |
25.6% |
0.25581395 |
| 3 |
Somewhat important |
32 |
37.2% |
0.37209302 |
| 4 |
Not very important |
15 |
17.4% |
0.17441860 |
| 5 |
Not important at all |
2 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
3 |
3.5% |
0.03488372 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1978 |
|
NA |
p6per10a
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: All things considered, it has been correct to merge municipalities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, it has been correct to merge municipalities.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Posed on the same page as p6per10b.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
449 |
21.8% |
0.21753876 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
575 |
27.9% |
0.27858527 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
555 |
26.9% |
0.26889535 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
443 |
21.5% |
0.21463178 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2% |
0.02034884 |
p6per10b
|
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: All things considered, it has been correct to merge county authorities.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
|
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, it has been correct to merge county authorities.
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Posed on the same page as p6per10a.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Strongly agree |
360 |
17.4% |
0.17441860 |
| 2 |
Somewhat agree |
426 |
20.6% |
0.20639535 |
| 3 |
Somewhat disagree |
621 |
30.1% |
0.30087209 |
| 4 |
Strongly disagree |
613 |
29.7% |
0.29699612 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.1% |
0.02131783 |
p6per11_rana
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per11.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2025] [Invalid:39] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in parliament |
984 |
48.6% |
0.4859259 |
| 2 |
in the municipal council |
1041 |
51.4% |
0.5140741 |
| Sysmiss |
|
39 |
|
NA |
p6per11_ranb
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per11.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2025] [Invalid:39] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in favour |
1037 |
51.2% |
0.5120988 |
| 2 |
against |
988 |
48.8% |
0.4879012 |
| Sysmiss |
|
39 |
|
NA |
p6per11_mask
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Inserts text in p6per11 if respondent is a representative in a county authority or in the government.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2025] [Invalid:39] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
[BLANK] |
1925 |
95.1% |
0.95061728 |
| 1 |
Imagine that you are a representative in the municipal council. |
100 |
4.9% |
0.04938272 |
| Sysmiss |
|
39 |
|
NA |
p6per11
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Merging municipalites if discussed anew
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a majority [p6per11_rana] has voted in favour of your municipality merging with a neighbouring municipality. After a referendum in your municipality, it turns out that a majority of the municipality’s residents are [p6per11_ranb] the merging of the municipality. [p6per11_mask]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you have voted if the proposal to merge the municipalities had again been discussed in the municipal council?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 != 4]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I would have voted in favour of the merger of the municipality |
1063 |
51.5% |
0.51526903 |
| 2 |
I would have voted against the merger of the municipality |
950 |
46% |
0.46049443 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
50 |
2.4% |
0.02423655 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1 |
|
NA |
p6per12a_rana
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per12a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomised for respondents who are not from Nordland, Møre og Romsdal, Oslo, and Rogaland.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1499] [Invalid:565] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in parliament |
737 |
49.2% |
0.4916611 |
| 2 |
in the county council |
762 |
50.8% |
0.5083389 |
| Sysmiss |
|
565 |
|
NA |
p6per12a_ranb
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per12a.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomised for respondents who are not from Nordland, Møre og Romsdal, Oslo, and Rogaland.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1499] [Invalid:565] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in favour |
743 |
49.6% |
0.4956638 |
| 2 |
against |
756 |
50.4% |
0.5043362 |
| Sysmiss |
|
565 |
|
NA |
p6per12a_mask
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Inserts text in p6per12a if respondent is a representative in a municipal authority or in the government.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1499] [Invalid:565] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
[BLANK] |
64 |
4.3% |
0.04269513 |
| 1 |
Imagine that you are a representative in the county council. |
1435 |
95.7% |
0.95730487 |
| Sysmiss |
|
565 |
|
NA |
p6per12a
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Dissolution of the recently merged county authority if discussed anew
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imaginge that a majority [p6per12a_rana] gas voted in favour of your recently merged county authority being dissolved. After a referendum in your countym it turns out that many of the county’s residents are [p6per12a_ranb] the dissolution. [p6per12a_mask]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you have voted if the proposal to dissolve the county authority was discussed again in the county council?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 != 4]
[Not posed to respondents from Nordland, Møre og Romsdal, Oslo, and Rogaland.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I would have voted in favour of dissolution of the county authority. |
744 |
48.7% |
0.48722986 |
| 2 |
I would have voted against the dissolution of the county authority. |
725 |
47.5% |
0.47478716 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
58 |
3.8% |
0.03798297 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
537 |
|
NA |
p6per12b_rana
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per12b.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomised for respondents who are from Nordland, Møre og Romsdal, Oslo, and Rogaland.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:525] [Invalid:1539] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in parliament |
263 |
50.1% |
0.5009524 |
| 2 |
in the county council |
262 |
49.9% |
0.4990476 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1539 |
|
NA |
p6per12b_ranb
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per12b.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomised for respondents who are from Nordland, Møre og Romsdal, Oslo, and Rogaland.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:525] [Invalid:1539] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
in favour |
271 |
51.6% |
0.5161905 |
| 2 |
against |
254 |
48.4% |
0.4838095 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1539 |
|
NA |
p6per12b_mask
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Inserts text in p6per12b if respondent is a representative in a municipal authority or in the government.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:525] [Invalid:1539] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
[BLANK] |
21 |
4% |
0.04 |
| 1 |
Imagine that you are a representative in the county council. |
504 |
96% |
0.96 |
| Sysmiss |
|
1539 |
|
NA |
p6per12b
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Merging counties if discussed anew
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a majority [p6per12b_rana] has voted in favour of your county merging with a neighbouring county. After a referendum in your county, it turns out that a majority of the county’s residents are [p6per12b_ranb] the merging of the county. [p6per12b_mask]
|
|
Literal question:
|
How would you have voted if the proposal to merge the county was discussed again in the city council?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 != 4]
[Posed to respondents from Nordland, Møre og Romsdal, Oslo, and Rogaland.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I would have voted in favour of the merger of the county |
218 |
40.7% |
0.40671642 |
| 2 |
I would have voted against the merger of the county |
302 |
56.3% |
0.56343284 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
16 |
3% |
0.02985075 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
1528 |
|
NA |
p6per13_ran1_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per13.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
[Randomisation of alternatives cannot take same value as [p6per13_ran1_2].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2022] [Invalid:42] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Jeanett Jensen |
507 |
25.1% |
0.2507418 |
| 2 |
Roger Jensen |
503 |
24.9% |
0.2487636 |
| 3 |
Hedvig Friele |
526 |
26% |
0.2601385 |
| 4 |
Leonard Friele |
486 |
24% |
0.2403561 |
| Sysmiss |
|
42 |
|
NA |
p6per13_ran1_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per13.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
[Randomisation of alternatives cannot take same value as [p6per13_ran1_1].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2022] [Invalid:42] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Jeanett Jensen |
494 |
24.4% |
0.2443126 |
| 2 |
Roger Jensen |
504 |
24.9% |
0.2492582 |
| 3 |
Hedvig Friele |
479 |
23.7% |
0.2368942 |
| 4 |
Leonard Friele |
545 |
27% |
0.2695351 |
| Sysmiss |
|
42 |
|
NA |
p6per13_ran2_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per13.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2022] [Invalid:42] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
, I'm 21 years old |
475 |
23.5% |
0.2349159 |
| 2 |
, I'm 41 years old |
570 |
28.2% |
0.2818991 |
| 3 |
, I'm 61 years old |
456 |
22.6% |
0.2255193 |
| 4 |
[BLANK] |
521 |
25.8% |
0.2576657 |
| Sysmiss |
|
42 |
|
NA |
p6per13_ran2_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per13.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2022] [Invalid:42] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
, I'm 21 years old |
476 |
23.5% |
0.2354105 |
| 2 |
, I'm 41 years old |
511 |
25.3% |
0.2527201 |
| 3 |
, I'm 61 years old |
517 |
25.6% |
0.2556874 |
| 4 |
[BLANK] |
518 |
25.6% |
0.2561820 |
| Sysmiss |
|
42 |
|
NA |
p6per13_ran3_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per13.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2022] [Invalid:42] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
and I'm a carpenter |
319 |
15.8% |
0.1577646 |
| 2 |
and I'm self-employed |
357 |
17.7% |
0.1765579 |
| 3 |
and work for NHO |
317 |
15.7% |
0.1567755 |
| 4 |
and work for LO |
353 |
17.5% |
0.1745796 |
| 5 |
and I'm a surgeon |
332 |
16.4% |
0.1641939 |
| 6 |
[BLANK] |
344 |
17% |
0.1701286 |
| Sysmiss |
|
42 |
|
NA |
p6per13_ran3_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per13.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2022] [Invalid:42] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
and I'm a carpenter |
364 |
18% |
0.1800198 |
| 2 |
and I'm self-employed |
319 |
15.8% |
0.1577646 |
| 3 |
and work for NHO |
339 |
16.8% |
0.1676558 |
| 4 |
and work for LO |
335 |
16.6% |
0.1656775 |
| 5 |
and I'm a surgeon |
338 |
16.7% |
0.1671612 |
| 6 |
[BLANK] |
327 |
16.2% |
0.1617211 |
| Sysmiss |
|
42 |
|
NA |
p6per13_ran4_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per13.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2022] [Invalid:42] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I did not vote for your party at the last election. |
505 |
25% |
0.2497527 |
| 2 |
I voted for your party at the last election. |
497 |
24.6% |
0.2457962 |
| 3 |
I've been a member of your party for many years. |
529 |
26.2% |
0.2616222 |
| 4 |
[BLANK] |
491 |
24.3% |
0.2428289 |
| Sysmiss |
|
42 |
|
NA |
p6per13_ran4_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per13.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2022] [Invalid:42] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I did not vote for your party at the last election. |
496 |
24.5% |
0.2453017 |
| 2 |
I voted for your party at the last election. |
511 |
25.3% |
0.2527201 |
| 3 |
I've been a member of your party for many years. |
514 |
25.4% |
0.2542038 |
| 4 |
[BLANK] |
501 |
24.8% |
0.2477745 |
| Sysmiss |
|
42 |
|
NA |
p6per13_ran5_1
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per13.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2022] [Invalid:42] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I want more information on |
638 |
31.6% |
0.3155292 |
| 2 |
I'd like to express my support to |
700 |
34.6% |
0.3461919 |
| 3 |
I'd like to express my criticism towards |
684 |
33.8% |
0.3382789 |
| Sysmiss |
|
42 |
|
NA |
p6per13_ran5_2
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per13.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2022] [Invalid:42] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
I want more information on |
686 |
33.9% |
0.3392681 |
| 2 |
I'd like to express my support to |
662 |
32.7% |
0.3273986 |
| 3 |
I'd like to express criticism towards |
674 |
33.3% |
0.3333333 |
| Sysmiss |
|
42 |
|
NA |
p6per13
|
Variable label:
|
If busy: Which e-mail would you respond to?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
As an elected representative you must sometimes prioritise what to spend time on. Imagine you’re busy and only manage to reply to one of two emails from two voters.
Hi,
My name is [p6per13_ran1_1][p6per13_ran2_1][p6per13_ran3_1].[p6per13_ran4_1]
I’m writing to you because [p6per13_ran5_1] your attitude to property taxes.
Can you explain your position on this matter?
Sincerely,
[p6per13_ran1_1]
Hi,
My name is [p6per13_ran1_2][p6per13_ran2_2][p6per13_ran3_2].[p6per13_ran4_2]
I’m writing to you because [p6per13_ran5_2] your attitude to property taxes.
Can you explain your position on this matter?
Sincerely,
[p6per13_ran1_2]
|
|
Literal question:
|
Which one would you have chosen to reply to?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Two versions of the e-mail is showed to the respondent. E-mail 1 collects values from [p6per13_ran1_1], [p6per13_ran2_1], [p6per13_ran3_1], [p6per13_ran4_1], and [p6per13_ran5_1]. E-mail 2 collects values from [p6per13_ran1_2], [p6per13_ran2_2], [p6per13_ran3_2], [p6per13_ran4_2], and [p6per13_ran5_2].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
E-mail 1 |
1021 |
49.5% |
0.49467054 |
| 2 |
E-mail 2 |
961 |
46.6% |
0.46560078 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
82 |
4% |
0.03972868 |
p6per14_rana
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per14.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2019] [Invalid:45] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
According to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will renewable
sources of energy (such as wind- or hydropower) on their own not be able to
produce sufficent amounts of low-carbon energy to reach the climate targets. |
685 |
33.9% |
0.3392769 |
| 2 |
Nuclear power is, according to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
a reliable and cheap low-carbon source of energy. |
641 |
31.7% |
0.3174839 |
| 3 |
[BLANK] |
693 |
34.3% |
0.3432392 |
| Sysmiss |
|
45 |
|
NA |
p6per14_ranb_mask
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Inputs text in [p6per14_ranb], dependent on assigned value in [p6per14_rana].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2019] [Invalid:45] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
furthermore |
1326 |
65.7% |
0.6567608 |
| 2 |
[BLANK] |
693 |
34.3% |
0.3432392 |
| Sysmiss |
|
45 |
|
NA |
p6per14_ranb
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per14.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2019] [Invalid:45] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
With the current nuclear reactors (generation III+), nuclear power
[p6per14_ranb_mask] is one of the safest sources of energy worldwide. |
641 |
31.7% |
0.3174839 |
| 2 |
The amount of radioactive waste generated from nuclear power is
[p6per14_ranb_mask] is very little, and we have developed methods for safe
disposal of the waste. |
700 |
34.7% |
0.3467063 |
| 3 |
[BLANK] |
678 |
33.6% |
0.3358098 |
| Sysmiss |
|
45 |
|
NA |
p6per14_ranc_maska
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Inputs text in the first alternative in [p6per14_ranc] dependent on assigned values in [p6per14_rana] and [p6per14_ranb].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2019] [Invalid:45] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Power demand will furthermore |
889 |
44% |
0.440317 |
| 2 |
In addition will power demand |
889 |
44% |
0.440317 |
| 3 |
Power demand will |
241 |
11.9% |
0.119366 |
| Sysmiss |
|
45 |
|
NA |
p6per14_ranc_maskb
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Inputs text in the second alternative in [p6per14_ranc] dependent on assigned values in [p6per14_rana] and [p6per14_ranb].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2019] [Invalid:45] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Hydrogen will furthermore |
889 |
44% |
0.440317 |
| 2 |
In addition will hydrogen |
889 |
44% |
0.440317 |
| 3 |
Hydrogen will |
241 |
11.9% |
0.119366 |
| Sysmiss |
|
45 |
|
NA |
p6per14_ranc
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per14.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2019] [Invalid:45] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
[p6per14_ranc_maska] increase dramatically when we will decarbonise heavy
industry. Nuclear power can produce large quantities of low-carbon electricity. |
686 |
34% |
0.3397722 |
| 2 |
[p6per14_ranc_maskb] increasingly regarded as an important part of future
systems of energy. Nuclear power can be used to produce clean hydrogen and meet
increasing demand after it as fuel. |
656 |
32.5% |
0.3249133 |
| 3 |
[BLANK] |
677 |
33.5% |
0.3353145 |
| Sysmiss |
|
45 |
|
NA |
p6per14_mask
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Inputs text in p6per14 dependent on assigned values in [p6per14_rana], [p6per14_ranb], and [p6per14_ranc].]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2019] [Invalid:45] [Range:0-1]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 0 |
Based on this information, how |
1927 |
95.4% |
0.95443289 |
| 1 |
How |
92 |
4.6% |
0.04556711 |
| Sysmiss |
|
45 |
|
NA |
p6per14
|
Variable label:
|
Support/oppose: Norway investing in nuclear power.
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
We’d like to know what you think about nuclear power.
[p6per14_rana] [p6per14_ranb] [p6per14_ranc]
|
|
Literal question:
|
[p6per14_mask] strongly do you support or oppose Norway investing in nuclear power?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Very strongly support |
191 |
9.3% |
0.09253876 |
| 2 |
Strongly support |
305 |
14.8% |
0.14777132 |
| 3 |
Somewhat support |
512 |
24.8% |
0.24806202 |
| 4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
281 |
13.6% |
0.13614341 |
| 5 |
Somewhat oppose |
211 |
10.2% |
0.10222868 |
| 6 |
Strongly oppose |
304 |
14.7% |
0.14728682 |
| 7 |
Very strongly oppose |
203 |
9.8% |
0.09835271 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
57 |
2.8% |
0.02761628 |
p6per15_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per15.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2013] [Invalid:51] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Imagine a random elected representative A is selected to receive a monetary
award of 2000 norwegian kroner. Elected representative A kan redistribute their
money with a random elected representative B. If you are selected to be elected
representative A you will choose whether, and how much, you will give to elected
representative B. |
1035 |
51.4% |
0.514158 |
| 2 |
Imaginge a random elected representative is selected to receive a monatary
award of 2000 norwegian kroner. The elected representative can redistribute
their money to a random norwegian resident. If you are selected to receive 2000
norwegian kroner you will choose whether, and how much, you will give to the
resident. |
978 |
48.6% |
0.485842 |
| Sysmiss |
|
51 |
|
NA |
p6per15
|
Variable label:
|
In a hypothetical scenario, how do you redistribute the outcome of a random allocation of a monetary award?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following question relates to a hypothetical scenario and is slightly different from the previous questions. We nevertheless ask you to put yourself in the situation and answer as well as you can. This question is aimed at finding out how people behave in certain situations and is often used in international research.
[p6per15_ran]
|
|
Literal question:
|
You can choose between giving nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0 norwegian kroner |
272 |
13.2% |
0.13178295 |
| 2 |
500 norwegian kroner |
77 |
3.7% |
0.03730620 |
| 3 |
1000 norwegian kroner |
799 |
38.7% |
0.38711240 |
| 4 |
1500 norwegian kroner |
30 |
1.5% |
0.01453488 |
| 5 |
2000 norwegian kroner |
796 |
38.6% |
0.38565891 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
90 |
4.4% |
0.04360465 |
p6per16_ran
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly selects an alternative for textpiping in p6per16.]
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if p6per21 is answered]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1898] [Invalid:166] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
55 % |
947 |
49.9% |
0.4989463 |
| 2 |
95 % |
951 |
50.1% |
0.5010537 |
| Sysmiss |
|
166 |
|
NA |
p6per21_reverse
|
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Inputs text in p6per16 which takes the opposite value of the respondents answer in p6per21.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1898] [Invalid:166] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
0.7 percent |
940 |
49.5% |
0.4952582 |
| 2 |
0 percent |
958 |
50.5% |
0.5047418 |
| Sysmiss |
|
166 |
|
NA |
p6per16
|
Variable label:
|
Voting on propterty tax, what would you vote for?
|
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine again that a municipality is discussing property taxes, and that the argument and the presumed consequences from the different sides of the discussion are still the same as the last time it was discussed in the municipality.
Let’s say that a number of representative opinion polls have been carried out in the municipality. They clearly show that [p6per16_ran] of the municipality’s residents, as well as [p6per16_ran] of those who voted for your party at the previous election, are in favour and [p6per21_reverse].
|
|
Literal question:
|
If it came to a vote and only stood between these two options, what would you have voted for?
|
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if p6P6 = 1 & p6per21 is answered]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Property tax of 0.7 percent |
1070 |
54.6% |
0.54563998 |
| 2 |
Property tax of 0 percent |
814 |
41.5% |
0.41509434 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
77 |
3.9% |
0.03926568 |
| 98 |
Not asked |
103 |
|
NA |
p6avslutt
|
Variable label:
|
Open: Feedback about the survey
|
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:2064] [Range:-]
|
p6P1
|
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Male |
1291 |
62.5% |
0.6254845 |
| 2 |
Female |
773 |
37.5% |
0.3745155 |
p6P2
|
Variable label:
|
Region where the representative is elected
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Oslo |
16 |
0.8% |
0.0077519380 |
| 2 |
Østlandet |
771 |
37.4% |
0.3735465116 |
| 3 |
Sørlandet |
146 |
7.1% |
0.0707364341 |
| 4 |
Vestlandet |
661 |
32% |
0.3202519380 |
| 5 |
Trøndelag |
175 |
8.5% |
0.0847868217 |
| 6 |
Nord-Norge |
294 |
14.2% |
0.1424418605 |
| 99 |
Not relevant |
1 |
0% |
0.0004844961 |
p6P3
|
Variable label:
|
County where the representative is elected
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:3-99]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 3 |
Oslo |
16 |
0.8% |
0.0077519380 |
| 11 |
Rogaland |
169 |
8.2% |
0.0818798450 |
| 15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
192 |
9.3% |
0.0930232558 |
| 18 |
Nordland |
159 |
7.7% |
0.0770348837 |
| 30 |
Viken |
395 |
19.1% |
0.1913759690 |
| 34 |
Innlandet |
215 |
10.4% |
0.1041666667 |
| 38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
161 |
7.8% |
0.0780038760 |
| 42 |
Agder |
146 |
7.1% |
0.0707364341 |
| 46 |
Vestlandet |
300 |
14.5% |
0.1453488372 |
| 50 |
Trøndelag |
175 |
8.5% |
0.0847868217 |
| 54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
135 |
6.5% |
0.0654069767 |
| 99 |
Not relevant |
1 |
0% |
0.0004844961 |
p6P3_1
|
Variable label:
|
Municipality
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:301-99999]
|
p6P4_1
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education (condensed)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No education/elementary school |
53 |
2.6% |
0.02567829 |
| 2 |
Upper secondary education |
575 |
27.9% |
0.27858527 |
| 3 |
University/University College |
1396 |
67.6% |
0.67635659 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
40 |
1.9% |
0.01937984 |
p6P4_2
|
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education (expanded)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
No completed education |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009689922 |
| 2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
51 |
2.5% |
0.0247093023 |
| 3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
159 |
7.7% |
0.0770348837 |
| 4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
233 |
11.3% |
0.1128875969 |
| 5 |
Craft training (e.g. vocational school, technical school/college, maritime
vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot training, secretary school,
home industry school/handicrafts school, master craftsman certificate training) |
183 |
8.9% |
0.0886627907 |
| 6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
226 |
10.9% |
0.1094961240 |
| 7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
443 |
21.5% |
0.2146317829 |
| 8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
134 |
6.5% |
0.0649224806 |
| 9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
212 |
10.3% |
0.1027131783 |
| 10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
340 |
16.5% |
0.1647286822 |
| 11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
41 |
2% |
0.0198643411 |
| 12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
16 |
0.8% |
0.0077519380 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.2% |
0.0116279070 |
p6P5_1
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (expanded)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2028] [Invalid:36] [Range:1-6]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1949 or earlier |
173 |
8.5% |
0.08530572 |
| 2 |
1950-1959 |
536 |
26.4% |
0.26429980 |
| 3 |
1960-1969 |
628 |
31% |
0.30966469 |
| 4 |
1970-1979 |
426 |
21% |
0.21005917 |
| 5 |
1980-1989 |
176 |
8.7% |
0.08678501 |
| 6 |
1990 or later |
89 |
4.4% |
0.04388560 |
| Sysmiss |
|
36 |
|
NA |
p6P5_2
|
Variable label:
|
Year of birth (condensed)
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2028] [Invalid:36] [Range:1-3]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
1959 or earlier |
709 |
35% |
0.3496055 |
| 2 |
1960-1989 |
1230 |
60.7% |
0.6065089 |
| 3 |
1990 or later |
89 |
4.4% |
0.0438856 |
| Sysmiss |
|
36 |
|
NA |
p6P6
|
Variable label:
|
Administrative level to which the representative is elected
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
Municipality |
1961 |
95% |
0.9500968992 |
| 2 |
County |
86 |
4.2% |
0.0416666667 |
| 3 |
Parliament |
16 |
0.8% |
0.0077519380 |
| 4 |
The Sami Parliament |
1 |
0% |
0.0004844961 |
p6P7
|
Variable label:
|
Party affiliation
|
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2064] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]
|
| Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
| 1 |
The Red Party |
49 |
2.4% |
0.0237403101 |
| 2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
146 |
7.1% |
0.0707364341 |
| 3 |
The Labour Party |
579 |
28.1% |
0.2805232558 |
| 4 |
The Centre Party |
413 |
20% |
0.2000968992 |
| 5 |
The Green Party |
83 |
4% |
0.0402131783 |
| 6 |
The Christian Democrats |
110 |
5.3% |
0.0532945736 |
| 7 |
The Liberal Party |
77 |
3.7% |
0.0373062016 |
| 8 |
The Conservative Party |
339 |
16.4% |
0.1642441860 |
| 9 |
The Progress Party |
133 |
6.4% |
0.0644379845 |
| 10 |
Other |
134 |
6.5% |
0.0649224806 |
| 97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0% |
0.0004844961 |
